Slashdot Mirror


Tai Chi Robots

dknight writes "It seems that Chinese scientists are currently developing a robot which is capable of doing tai chi. The robot is being developed by the Beijing University of Science and Engineering, and is touted to be a great breakthrough in worker safety, as these robots could be used to perform dangerous work. They are supposedly able to sense changes in the slope of the earth around them (hills, etc.) and balance themselves out."

222 comments

  1. Ummm... by peacefinder · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder how they're gonna get 'em to breathe right?

    --
    With reasonable men I will reason; with humane men I will plead; but to tyrants I will give no quarter. -- William Lloyd
    1. Re:Ummm... by Ravagin · · Score: 2

      Yeah, really. I can see them making a robot that can execute the forms, but that's not really what doing tai'chi is all about. Ah well, i guess it sounds good for PR purposes.

      --

      Karma: T-rexcellent.

    2. Re:Ummm... by Threni · · Score: 1

      And are the commies gonna persecute them too? or is that just falun gong?!

    3. Re:Ummm... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      I think the point is about the thing's ability to balance itself in a natural manner.

      If it can handle easily being progrmamed to do tai'chi, something even many humans can't do easily, it has great usefulness.

    4. Re:Ummm... by vtweb · · Score: 1

      The article says:

      "Chinese scientists have built a 1.58-metre and 76 kilogram robot which can play tai chi, the traditional Chinese form of shadow boxing"

      Shadow boxing is another name for "push hands", which is the engaging of contact with a partner.

      While the sentence seems to equate all of Tai Chi with shadow boxing, it also impies that the robot can interact via push hands style.

      However, what would this be like? With no psyche, and no consciousness, it might be like working with a piece of hanging rope.

    5. Re:Ummm... by deadsaijinx* · · Score: 1

      ...it has great usefulness. you mean like making a horde of tai'chi loving super assassins designed to take out Richard Simmons - Father of Workout Tape Evil. on second thought... no

      --
      YOU SUCK BALLS!
    6. Re:Ummm... by Turbyne · · Score: 1
      I wonder how they're gonna get 'em to breathe right?
      120mm Fans
      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
    7. Re:Ummm... by mutatron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's exactly how push hands is supposed to be. Working with and empty mind, devoid of self, this robot would be the perfect tai chi master!

    8. Re:Ummm... by vtweb · · Score: 1

      But only for one half of the process- it may perfect the 'Yin' role, but what of the 'Yang'? Would it initiate in a way that would generate true interaction? The moment it relied on programming, it is not in the moment, and not Tai Chi. It would not only have to balance itself, but it would need to be able to detect imbalance in the opponent, and respond appropriately. A hanging rope is great Yin, but will never initiate. Can this robot do so?

  2. So...slow... by Stillman · · Score: 5, Funny

    So if you gave them a faster processor, could they do other martial arts? ;)

    >

    --
    Prisoner #655321
    1. Re:So...slow... by Kierthos · · Score: 5, Funny

      *insert 2.5 Ghz processor*
      Robot: Whoa. I know Kung Fu.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    2. Re:So...slow... by Enonu · · Score: 2

      With the new Intel Pentium XP, your Tai Chi robot will be able to beat the b'Jesus out of you and your grandma in the comfort of your own home!

    3. Re:So...slow... by metlin · · Score: 2

      Show me :-P

  3. Uh.. by pilot1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    whats the point of a robot that does martial arts? I doubt one would ever be able to defeat anyone, since the robots can't "think".

    1. Re:Uh.. by Stillman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Balance. Coordination. Grace.
      Things that are pretty damn impressive for a robot.

      --
      Prisoner #655321
    2. Re:Uh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try reading at least the entire blurb on Slashdot if you aren't going to read the article. Such robots can be used to do dangerous work that would otherwise be done by humans.

    3. Re:Uh.. by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is not a cartoon battling robot we are talking about.

      The point is to have a human-shaped robot that is able to balance itself on uneven terran, while in various positions.

      I am guessng that they picked tai chi becuase it's collection of forms with emphsis on balance, besides using it as a gimmick.

    4. Re:Uh.. by Beebos · · Score: 1

      Uh...

      I don't believe Tai Chi is a Martial Art.

    5. Re:Uh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never seen BattleBots, have you?

    6. Re:Uh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you believe has no particular relevance, and its about time you figured that out.

    7. Re:Uh.. by Zzootnik · · Score: 2

      I can't believe I'm actually going to mention this one...BUT...

      Haven't you ever seen the movie "the Ice Pirates"?
      Kung-foo fightin robot Action!

      And then there's the whole thing about spectator sports...That'll really introduce programming back into the mix...I can see the best programmed robots fighting each other autonomously (not like battlebots...). This could be big...

      --
      Sig currently under construction. Mind the gap....
    8. Re:Uh.. by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      The purpose for the robot to learn Tai Chi is to test its balance capabilities. Tai Chi is just chalk full of complex body movements, and intense balance is needed (I mean really, Tai Chi is hard enough for humans to do at a master level!) There's no mention that this robot would ever try to defeat anyone or enter any tournaments....

      However, I have no qualms with saying that a martial arts robot would pose quite a challenge.. I don't know why you don't think they could defeat you! One could program every martial arts move from Jujitsu, Aikido, Kung Fu, Karate, etc and it would perform those moves perfectly and know how to apply them to a fight in progress. Yes, Matrix references are necessary here, except the robot would be at a much higher level of precision than Keanu Reeves, or even Jet Li.

      Don't forget also that the robot can be made of metal; this puts a new twist on the Iron Head technique.

    9. Re:Uh.. by buttahead · · Score: 1

      dude, watch the Terminator movies!

    10. Re:Uh.. by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. I won't hand you the URLs on a plate, though

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  4. Sense of Balance by FocaJonathan · · Score: 5, Funny
    They are supposedly able to sense changes in the slope of the earth around them (hills, etc.) and balance themselves out.

    Why not just put the chinese robot on a Segway?

    1. Re:Sense of Balance by geekoid · · Score: 2

      this has been marked as funny, and it is, but I was wondering this exact same thing eralier in the week. I think ti would work fine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Sense of Balance by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the french maid's outfit so you can make the world's first "Rosie".

      http://www.jeffbots.com/rosie.html

      TW

  5. Standards by zabieru · · Score: 1

    Hmm... That's actually a pretty good measurement of the ability to act like a human, physically. Sounded aweful silly when I read the headline, but any robot that could meet the standards of flexibility and balance I'd want if it was gonna be doing something I cared about could probably do tai chi as well...

  6. Tai Chi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Four years ago I was buying fireworks at a local place. The guy working there wanted $1.99 for a bottle rocket. I told him that some day I would be able to buy a wintel computer for my kids for $599. He laughed and said, "LOL, Tai Chi Robots".

  7. Now all they need... by Julian+Morrison · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...is Kung Fu robots!! and then they'll be able to take over the wooorld!!!! bwahahahah

  8. Worker safety ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Imagine a Beowulf ... err, union of these

  9. I need one of these... by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 5, Funny
    I'm too lazy to do Tai Chi myself. What a perfect example of robots doing repetitive tasks for us. We really do live like the Jetsons. =)

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

  10. heh by grub · · Score: 1, Troll


    It's good to see that when they aren't busy making draconian filters and firewalls that they are doing something useful with their time.. Tai Chi robots. Sweet...

    [/sarcasm]

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, the caps use you!

      i am such an ass. i did the stupidest thing yesterday. live and learn.

      Stephen King, author, dead at 55

      I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Horror/Sci Fi writer Stephen King was found dead in his Maine home this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.

      but i did find $30 wrapped up in a grocery store receipt that i forgot about. cool.

      BCWOTD(TM) : "pelican." sample usage: "I wonder if pelicans taste like chicken. If so, shouldn't pelicans be called 'Chicken of the Sea'? I mean, tuna fish don't have feathers."

      If you feel like it, mail the url, and where ya came from to pater@slashdot.org.

      bleh. i have a headache.

      i have this nagging feeling that Jared from the Subway commercials is an Elvis fan. what do you think?

  11. So when the robot gets to old for by nlinecomputers · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...martial arts is it going to become a bad actor and do martial art/cop shows.

    I can see it now:

    Robbie the Robot
    Texas Ranger


    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:So when the robot gets to old for by Herz · · Score: 1

      Or move to USA and be president

      --
      In vino vici
    2. Re:So when the robot gets to old for by slantyyz · · Score: 2

      Those don't sound like exciting shows.

      How about the The Mighty Falun Gong Fighting Cyber-Force? I'd almost watch that. Can you imagine the geek following the Pink Robot would have?

  12. Hmm by cethiesus · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now if they could only build a robot that could do some mean Chai-Tea...

    *ba-dum-chee*

    --


    "Ford," he said, "you're turning into a penguin. Stop it."
    1. Re:Hmm by BitHive · · Score: 1, Troll

      "Chai" means "Tea", so you are, in effect, asking for a robot that makes Tea Tea. It's like talking about DSL lines and PIN numbers.

    2. Re:Hmm by cpthowdy · · Score: 0

      At least he's not asking for a robot that makes Pee Pee.

    3. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod this up. Funniest Comment that is in this whole discussion.

    4. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chai-tea is a spiced milk-tea from India.

    5. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Da, Chai s'limonum, pozhalsta!

  13. Tai Chi Balance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's the point?

    A walking robot that can perform VERY complex motion sequences, balance itself, and respond in real-time to dangerous situations. These robots (or a later generation) could be used to perform rescue tasks in damaged buildings after an earthquake, when the danger of aftershock is still very high-so if the building did collapse, a robot would die, not an extra human being.

    1. Re:Tai Chi Balance? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      Unh... think this through a bit. "a robot would die"? Just because the body was damaged? High voltage electric shock, yes, that's what backups are for. But simple crumpling of the body would generally leave the brains intact. And training a robot will be expensive, so you want to save the memories.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Tai Chi Balance? by Total_Wimp · · Score: 1

      By the time you get a robot good enough to go into a post-earthquake building and rescue someone you almost have to ask yourself whether the robot is more valuable than the person being saved.

      As in: "Thank god we saved the 7-11 clerk and only lost three firefighters in the process!"

      Yeah, I know, humans are always more important, but navigating the complexities of a half-colapsed building is almost a Turing test in itself.

      TW

    3. Re:Tai Chi Balance? by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Er, I'd hope we aren't going to be living the the Star Trek future were nobody is allowed to make backups. I'd imagine the possible (probable?) loss of the (no doubt very expensive) robot would limit the amount it is used. It's probably not good economic sense to loose five 100 million dollar robots trying to pull some homeless drunk out of burning building.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Tai Chi Balance? by psyclo · · Score: 1

      Actually, given the progression of technology involved, it wouldn't take much for a robot of this type to actually be more able to survive, making the absolutely correct motions as the right time to avoid falling debris and move out of the area faster than a human possibly could.

      Furthermore, considering the wireless technologies coming out, envision a single robot with multiple "bodies" instead of multiple independent robots. A robot with smart limbs which operate on their own could literally disassemble itself to fit through a small opening, reassemble on the other side. And that could happen extremely fast, as well.

      --
      =======================
      Psyclo, the dark night.
      Mike, the computer geek.
  14. Dumbest idea ever by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, of all the things you can get a robot to do.. tai chi? Geez, Loueez that's lame! What are they thinking? "Let's make a robot that moves reeeeaaaaal slow."

    Lift one foot.

    Raise an arm.

    Even when I was a kid I had a toy robot that had machine guns shoot from its chest. Now that's a robot! At least make it a girl robot and have it do yoga or backbends or something.

    1. Re:Dumbest idea ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuckwad. Tai Chi, when wielded by a master of that method, is one of the more deadlier forms of martial arts.

      Think before you speak, dimwit.

    2. Re:Dumbest idea ever by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2

      Ah, grasshopper, you have much to learn of the art of English grammar.

      --

      --sdem
    3. Re:Dumbest idea ever by cpthowdy · · Score: 0

      And after you master the English grammer, you can begin learning the Engrish grammer.

  15. Credible? by Grip3n · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've looked on Google, Yahoo!, and even tried to find the information from other sites containing news from the source AFP (which the site credits the information from) and there is literally no other even mention of this robot on the web. I can't help but wonder about the credibility of this article.

    --
    To make a pun demonstrates the highest understanding of a language
    1. Re:Credible? by theCat · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had a doubt too. I searched on the name of the professor, Kejie Li, and not only is that a real professor in China (at one time Professor at Beijing Institute of Technology, China) Kejie Li even gave a talk to the 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligent for Robotics and Automation, in Banff National Park, Canada, titled "Humanoid Walk Control with Feedforward Dynamic". OK, so they didn't advertise a robot doing Tai Chi at the symposium but they've clearly been up to something. Pretty cool if you ask me.

      --
      =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
    2. Re:Credible? by bheerssen · · Score: 3, Informative

      This looks like it could be the original source.

      I'm don't know what you searched under, but Google returns these results.

      Some others have picked up on it, there are some loose translations, but no real original articles. No pictures either.

      Yeah, this looks a little vaporous. I hope not,the technology is certainly feasible, but I'm a little skeptical of uncorroborated articles in national chinese news sites. The japanese, however, have a robot that looks promising.

      --
      (Score: -1, Stupid)
    3. Re:Credible? by nilius · · Score: 1

      "The robot named BHR-1 passed appraisal on Saturday as a major project for the Beijing University of Science and Engineering under China's High and New Technology Research and Development Program, the official Xinhua news agency said."

      I think this is the original story that was cut and pasted. I Haven't been able to find anything else on it. I can't even find a home page for the school in question, only obscure references in other not very informative articles. such as... this

      I'd love to see a more technical description of how it balances itself without an equilibrium and thousands of years of evolution.

      -niles

    4. Re:Credible? by Turbyne · · Score: 1

      Did you look up -kz S÷SílH?

      --
      ~A'Ëq'i4d)^'$ÊSÈòB
  16. Anyone have more by snitty · · Score: 1

    The article was a bit lacking. I have to assume it was a bip-ped, but given that top animatronics engineers can't figure out how to make a free standing movable bi-ped, I'm kind of surprised that someone else can, even if it only moves at a thrilling 33cm a step.

    And it has to be able to make 50 step a minute to do 1 km/hour. That's a fairly impressive statistic for a self balancing bi-ped.

    Does anyone have more info, or story from a reputable news site?

    --
    Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
  17. Forget that by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't want a robot that co do Tai Chi. What we need is a robot that can do Karma Sutra.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Forget that by cpthowdy · · Score: 0

      We're halfway there: www.realdoll.com

    2. Re:Forget that by geekoid · · Score: 2

      here you go:
      bad sci-fi

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. Keanu by limekiller4 · · Score: 2

    Imagine being the scientist working on this when Mister Roboto looks you square in the eyes and says, "Whoa... I know Tai chi."

    I mean, do you suppose the robot will be able to kill him before he reaches the plug?

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  19. Quatrain by bobtheprophet · · Score: 1

    They say the robot does dangerous jobs
    And they say the robot can do tai chi
    Maybe I'm just missing something, but
    Tai chi doesn't seem dangerous to me.
    ---
    It's a joke, laugh.

    --
    Don't give me none of this "nature theme" business.
  20. They may have a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    With all the fast processors around, will they be able to find one slow enough to do Tai Chi? Big problem.

    I have a 286 chip lying around somewhere that I can donate.

  21. My Obligations... by bahwi · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The Chi is strong in this one..." ...NEXT!

    They are supposedly able to sense changes in the slope of the earth around them (hills, etc.) and balance themselves out.

    They also can sense the emotions and ambitions of the humans around them, slowly feeding off of their pain and misery, and always plotting against us.

    Something different:

    They can sense the coming of the Singularity by using their advanced meditation techniques. Slowly watching us they are, gathing information, to make the elimination of the humans that much more quick. ..NEXT!

    Tai Chi Tamagochi Robots! If you feed them they'll grow into Tai Chi Masters, able to masterfully perform even the most difficult moves of Tai Chi.

    COLLECT ALL 6 TODAY!!

    (Only at Participating McHughs Restaraunts. While Supplies Last.) .NEXT!

    It'd be cooler if they were powered by Chi.

    NEXT!

    "Li added that this type of robot would be able to take over some dangerous jobs from humans."

    --As soon as I get my gun, I guess they'll have robotic telemarketers*. Now I need an EMP.

    END!

    New Movies Titles:
    "Kung Fu Tai Chi Fighting Robots from Outer Space!"

    "Tai Chi Robots from HELL!"

    * I do not condone the shooting of telemarketers in this economy. But as soon as things improve and a better job opens up, say, anything, it'll be ok again.

    1. Re:My Obligations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, dear.

      Does your mother know you're going to be alone tonight ?

  22. Another Use by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Program them to do all those insipid line dances such as the Macarena, Boot Scoot, Electric Slide, etc. Then have a group of them do the dances on international television so the wole world can watch and see how truely stupid they are.

    Conversely, they could be programed to do traditional dances from many cultures and preserve these art forms in an extremely interesting way.

    Some kid in 2140 wants to know how to do the Latin Hustle? Out comes the Tai-Bot and shows them how. Even play an OGG recording of K.C. And the Shunshine Band at the same time.

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:Another Use by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1
      Even play an OGG recording of K.C. And the Shunshine Band at the same time.

      Some things *should* be forgotten.

    2. Re:Another Use by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

      So, that means you'ld rather do the Latin Hustle to... which Backstreat Boys song did you say? And with the Tai Chi robot? Interesting choice of music and partners...

      --
      Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  23. the most important thing by pummer · · Score: 5, Funny

    are they going to get the robot's mouth to move totally independently of the sounds coming out of the speakers?

    1. Re:the most important thing by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      are they going to get the robot's mouth to move totally independently of the sounds coming out of the speakers?

      Hey, if they do that live, and then you film it and re-dub it, it might cancel out and be normal. No?

  24. I'd only point out that. . . by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Tai Chi is not "shadow boxing" as the basically uninformative blurb the story links to states. It's a legitimate martial art perfectly useful for beating the crap out of people.

    Yes, it has it's solo forms, typically practiced in slow motion, just as other martial arts have *their* practice kata, and just as these other martial arts have kata with partners so does Tai Chi, as well as full out sparing.

    Don't be fooled by the new age types teaching it badly to Granny in the park, and don't take lessons in it from any instructor not competent to teach it *as* a martial art. They don't know what they're doing.

    That said, any robot that can go through a Yang Long Form with me is a *major* step forward in humanoid robotics. Hell, it takes a great deal of practice and training for a *human* to do it vaguely properly and I want to see this puppy in action.

    I wonder how it would do in "pushing hands"? That would be the ultimate test.

    KFG

    1. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Yeah right. Pit a boxer against a guy doing "flying phoenix pushing sky butt monkey hand" at four miles an hour to be in harmony with the universe is going to be panelled into next year.

      Why in GODS NAME are they making a robot that can do Tai Chi? That's what old people are for.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    2. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by netsharc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Heh, you have never seen Tai Chi in fast forward. Move your hands forwards and upwards, that blocks the punch and forces the arm of the opponent upwards. One hand stays in front, the other pulls back towards the body. That hand just grabbed the attackers hand, and pulling him down as the other hand smacks him in the face.

      It's all about taking the bad guy's force and using it against himself.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    3. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Kdr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you knew anything about Tai Chi you would know that it is practiced much slower than when you would use it as a martial art. If you ever have the chance to see a true Tai Chi Master in combat you will see that they are more than a challenge for your boxer. What can your boxer do but throw punches? A Tai Chi expert would not need to throw a single punch.

      --
      53 Wood Elf Champion ~Fennin Ro~
    4. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude...

      change your sig!

    5. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tai chi is colloquially known as "shadow boxing" amoung many asiatic countries. Kata is a japanese word, the yang form was developed for exercise. I would like to do push hands with you, it would be amusing.

    6. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      First off you don't want to pit a boxer against a Kung Fu-like martial arts.. the boxer has the severe disadvantage that he can't kick or hit below the belt.. he'll lose almost by default at this point since the martial artist can pin him, grapple him, kick him in the legs, apply pressure points.. and you know, all that good stuff. Also, what you see at "4 mph" isn't how its really done, the quickness of Tai Chi masters will suprise you when applied (and can be almost deadly).

      A more fitting match would be a to throw in a grappler (like a wrestler or brazillian jujitsu guy), then you just get the Ultimate Fighting Championships.. which turn out rather bland since both fighters just spend the entire time on the ground and in the bitch position..

    7. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I have. It looks like two spastics flailing at each other.

      Ever notice that "blocks the punch and forces the arm of the opponent upwards" isn't ever used in boxing? Because it doesn't work, except when some decrepit Chinese guy is showing you in slow motion, and the other guy is making NO attempt to connect with the punch.

      I'd like to see one of these "exalted Grandmaster of Flowers" types take on Mike Tyson. It'd be a real quick fight. "Ok, now to execute har flung kip in quick motioTyson lunges inPUNCH PUNCH PUNCH PUNCH SMACK 1....2....3....4....5....6....7....8....9...10!!!! ! KO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    8. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 1, Troll

      RE: First off you don't want to pit a boxer against a Kung Fu-like martial arts..

      Correct, because the boxer would kick his ass.

      RE: the boxer has the severe disadvantage that he can't kick or hit below the belt..

      Most idiots who try those fancy kicks in biker bars end up smack face down in a pile of cigarette butts and broken glass on the wrong end of a beatdown.

      RE: he'll lose almost by default at this point since the martial artist can pin him, grapple him, kick him in the legs, apply pressure points.. and you know, all that good stuff.

      And the boxer can chew his ears off.

      RE: Also, what you see at "4 mph" isn't how its really done, the quickness of Tai Chi masters will suprise you when applied (and can be almost deadly).

      So deadly in fact, that they NEVER do so. Or could it possibly be that they don't want to ruin the illusion that Tai Chi is for nothing more than geeks in silk pyjamas and women on the Oxygen network?

      RE: A more fitting match would be a to throw in a grappler (like a wrestler or brazillian jujitsu guy), then you just get the Ultimate Fighting Championships.. which turn out rather bland since both fighters just spend the entire time on the ground and in the bitch position..

      Because the Gracies ensure that the fight's rigged. The floor is padded, so punchers and kickers lose a lot of their power. Add to that no biting is allowed, no fishhooking, no tearing, no eyeball gouging, you know, the kind of thing that'd happen in a real fight and make Mr. Gracie's "bitch position" look VERY VERY VERY stupid and suicidal like it is. It's one thing to be in a padded floor with rules and a referee and fifty of your brothers standing around, and another to be in a real fight.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    9. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      No, the tai chi master would stand there, while wood flute music started playing out of nowhere, and then he'd do some mystical thing with his hand and the other guy would just go flying for no reason. Dude, I'm talking about reality, not "Wu Tang Theater present Chop Sockey Fighty flying people movie OK!"

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    10. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... either you're a boxer that's (pardon the pun) defensive about the art you've put a lot of effort into, or you don't know much about martial arts beyond what you've seen in movies.

    11. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having seen something similar in action, I'd bet on the exalted Grandmaster. Katas are practiced in slow motion to build technique and strength. Yes, strength. Try doing a head-high front kick at 1/20 the speed and see if you can keep your leg extended at head-height for more than a fraction of a second.

      And if you believe that technique is unimportant compared to strength, might I invite you to visit the Skip Barber racing school and take the Econoline Van tour, where the instructor races one of the beginner students. The instructor gets an Econoline van, and the student is in a Corvette. I'll give you three guesses as to who wins, and the first two don't count.

      It's the same thing in combat. Proper technique and speed will slaughter brute force any day of the week.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    12. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm neither. But I've seen a lot of beatings go down, and I've personally thrown a couple of TKD guys on their backs in my time.

      Anyone who thinks their flying pyjama dance lesson will help them against someone larger and scarier is living in a fantasy world. EVERY pugilistic event has weight classes. Wonder why? Wouldn't the bantamweight with superior technique outclass the 300lb behemoth? No, the behemoth would pound the bantamweight into a red smear.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    13. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: Having seen something similar in action, I'd bet on the exalted Grandmaster. Katas are practiced in slow motion to build technique and strength. Yes, strength. Try doing a head-high front kick at 1/20 the speed and see if you can keep your leg extended at head-height for more than a fraction of a second.

      Yes, and Jean Claude Van Damne is a ballet dancer and their routines include not only that but doing situps one vertebra at a time. However, up against Chuck Zito, he was rapidly pounded into bleeding oblivion.

      RE: And if you believe that technique is unimportant compared to strength, might I invite you to visit the Skip Barber racing school and take the Econoline Van tour, where the instructor races one of the beginner students. The instructor gets an Econoline van, and the student is in a Corvette. I'll give you three guesses as to who wins, and the first two don't count.

      And I would invite you to see a bantamweight take on a superheavyweight, in any pugilistic sport. Technique wins if the people are equal - but the world's greatest karate kid is one punch away from being oblivionated by a large adult.

      RE: It's the same thing in combat. Proper technique and speed will slaughter brute force any day of the week.

      Yeah, yeah. Keep believing that. Only, one of these days you're going to try your flowery dragon rainbow monkey scissor kick against a no-necked behemoth, and you're going to end up in traction.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    14. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by netsharc · · Score: 2

      I see you're not convinced. Oh well, I'll believe what I believe in, you can believe in what you believe in, maybe someday we'll see something that will prove or disprove our beliefs, but in the mean time, I won't try to convince you otherwise.

      Happy new year!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    15. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Nope!

      I've seen a lot of black belts rendered VERY un-cocky by larger, untrained fighters. Problem is, you see, they didn't throw the punch exactly the way they did it in class, you know, at about three miles an hour, in a huge arc, with no intent for it to land. Instead, the guy jabbed, or feinted. And then proceeded to hand the guy his own ass.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    16. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2

      Three things. First:

      Van Damme isn't a boxer, he's a very competent martial artist (kickboxing and jeet kun do) with fantastic technique (unlike, say, Steven Segal, but that's another story). He has much more in common with our aforementioned Grandmaster than he does with Mike "Lend me your Ear" Tyson.

      Your second analogy about the superheavyweight vs. the bantamweight is also flawed; it's assuming that both have had the same training and are competing in the same style; a Tai Chi or Gung Fu master has had vastly different training than Mike Tyson; It's like putting a Nascar driver (in his Nascar vehicle) on a Formula-1 circuit; sure, in his element, he may be fantastic; but he'll be seeing exhaust fumes in F1.

      Second:

      I think your only experience with martial arts is what you've seen in the movies (most of which isn't real), and some of the *worthless* "self defense" and Tae-Kwon-Doe classes taught in suburbs and at junior colleges[1]. If you think that a Tai-Chi master is just some git who earned his black belt by attending thrice weekly for a few years, you've got another thing coming.

      Third, and final:

      I think you need to lighten up, maybe seek therapy.

      [1] On a funny note, I once took one of those "self defense" classes for shits-and-giggles; hey, P.E. units are required, and it looked like fun. Sad thing is, the "master" couldn't joint-lock or throw me, and his student assistants (the "high level" students) were slow as hell -- too many Twinkies from what I could see; I accidentally injured one of the student assistants because I was expecting him to move his leg before I could kick his shin, and he didn't. I'm just glad I wasn't kicking full-force, or I would have shattered his leg!

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    17. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cocky black belts are people who train a sport, not a martial art.

    18. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call TKD a martial art, so much as a gymnastic exercise. One problem with TKD is that they study kicking nearly to the exlusion of anything else. Not overly useful.

      As for weight classes, no, the behemoth won't always pound the bantamweight with better technique into a red smear. My former instructor, a little tiny Japanese runt, took his big, 250+ lb, heavy-hitting now brother-in-law to the hospital after brother-in-law decided he'd show instructor that "flying pyjama dance lessons" is a load of crap, quite similar to what you're saying now. Brother-in-law is now an instructor of said "flying pyjama dance lessons".

      So... before you go dismissing "flying pyjama dance lessons" as bollocks, perhaps you ought to actually go study martial arts for a few years.

    19. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by iabervon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Have you even seen a two-legged robot try to move? All the ones I've seen have fallen, and they can't get up. Makes sense to teach them something old people do to improve their balance...

    20. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by vjzuylen · · Score: 2

      You're comparing apples to oranges. Of course someone who only practices martial arts movements will lose to a boxer or an untrained fighter who's actually been in a few scraps. The reverse also applies; a boxer who's only practiced on a punching bag will lose to a martial artist who's actually been in a ring or an actual fight.

      *That's* where you get to prove what you've learned, and that's where - theoretically at least, but I've seen it in practice, regardless of whether you believe me or not - an experienced martial artist will always have an advantage over an experienced boxer of the same weight class.

      You don't even need fancy flying or spinning kicks; a good sweep or a kick to the knees is easy enough, and something that the boxer doesn't train for.

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
    21. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Ytrew+Q.+Uiop · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks their flying pyjama dance lesson will help them against someone larger and scarier is living in a fantasy world.

      I disagree. It doesn't matter if someone is stronger than you, if you can hurt them, and they can't hurt you.

      EVERY pugilistic event has weight classes. Wonder why?

      To make it sporting, and to keep it safe, of course. Weight classes keep the event friendly: so that the competitors can apply roughly equal brute force, and skill can be applied safely. It prevents a well skilled, but smaller person from having to apply a dangerous amount of force to win against someone bigger, and prevents a big person from harming a less skilled, smaller person as well.

      When I did ground fighting with people smaller and weaker than me[1], the ones who were experts did kick my ass, because they could move faster, and use my motion against me. But I beat the other novices and intermediate fighters, because I had a thirty to fifty pound mass advantage. Mass and strength are important. So are skill and conditioning.

      Wouldn't the bantamweight with superior technique outclass the 300lb behemoth? No, the behemoth would pound the bantamweight into a red smear.

      If he ever got his hands on him, maybe. In a real fight for his life, the lightweight guy might just break the big guy's foot with a snap kick, then take advantage of the pain and loss of balance to break the knee on the other leg. Elapsed time: a few miliseconds, for someone skilled in the art, with reason to use it. Once the big guy can't stand, he's lost. The little guy can walk away, or run behind him, and kick him in the back of the head, or wait for him to pass out from shock.

      If the big guy never gets the chance to apply his strength, it can't help him. The "art" in martial arts can be described as: "how not to get pounded in a red smear by someone bigger". It's not hard to beat up a small person of equal skill; martial arts assumes you're fighting someone your size or bigger.

      Martial arts of any sort is not a silver bullet, but it's foolish to assume that brute force will always prevail. What good is brute force if your opponent isn't there when you punch at them? I'd rather have Mike Tyson punch at my head, and miss[1], than have a teenage girl punch me in the groin, and hit.
      --
      Ytrew

      [1] Unfortunately, Mike Tyson probably wouldn't miss. But then, he's put years of training in boxing, a sport with strong martial applications.

    22. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by josh+crawley · · Score: 1

      If we're talking about Tyson here, get it right.
      It's PUNCH PUNCH PUNCH SMACK 1.... MUNCH 2.... MUNCH MUNCH 3.... 4..... YUM 5..... Cauliflower Ear 6.....

    23. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by chenzhen · · Score: 1

      I practice Chen and Yang styles of taiji. I weigh 155 lbs and hold my own against untrained fighters in the ~190lbs range and trained tkd fighters of over 200lbs. This is not because my style is better. It is because I have studied the form as a fluid instead of a discrete set of responses to specific attacks. Laoshr teaches a holistic approach to combat that generates a combination of balance and reflex; when sparring, I do not respond in a set way, but a way that "feels" right. While this is painfully unscientific, it works because one's opponent is either wasting time thinking frantically about "moves" (tkd), or fighting by a feeling (untrained) which is less developed than my own.

      By the way, taiji does not traditionally employ a belt system.

    24. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by NateKid · · Score: 1

      As a wrestler/bjj guy myself let me say that both UFC and Pride (its Japanese counterpart) are no longer about the "lay-and-pray" style of fighters. With guys like Sakuraba, Baroni, Ortiz and Silva fighting they are turning into exciting bloodfests. I hope the guard (that aforemention bitch position) is completely eradicated since it has no place on the street (you're vulnerable to being stomped out, etc.) and therefore doesn't belong in reality combat.
      My $.02
      Nate

    25. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recomend you to go and practice with a capable teacher such as . Maybe then you will get a clue.

    26. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by archivis · · Score: 1

      The skills taught by the martial arts are useful - but in the modern age somewhat dated. Given the roots of many disciplines in providing weapons for those required to go "unarmed" (peasants, rebels, etc) a bare-hand master is a bit outclassed by technology.

      What we need are the martial arts equivalents of napalm, cluster munitions, nukes, and asteroid drops... Not to mention tanks, gunships, carriers, and subs.

      --
      In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
    27. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

      Yes, I actually have noticed this recent trend as well, and am really excited about the prospect of more exciting matches.. it'll be really interesting to see where UFC is really headed, because it sure isn't the same animal as it used to be..

    28. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Don't make stupid assumptions, I actually did study martial arts for a few years.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    29. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Possibly because the large 250+lb brother in law didn't start out intending on killing the little Japanese runt. If they'd met in a bar with the brother in law seeing red, it'd have been a different story.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    30. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: Van Damme isn't a boxer, he's a very competent martial artist (kickboxing and jeet kun do) with fantastic technique (unlike, say, Steven Segal, but that's another story). He has much more in common with our aforementioned Grandmaster than he does with Mike "Lend me your Ear" Tyson.

      Yeah, and Van Damne got his ass kicked by Chuck Zito. I mean pounded up real good, by Chuck Zito. Chuck Zito did not get the gold belt and blue silk pajamas of Rainbow Flying Fish Monkey fist, he's a biker who's seen fights. When Van Damne said Chuck was lucky he slipped on some water, Zito called into the show Van Damne made this stupid statement on and offered a televised rematch. Van Damne couldn't backpedal fast enough. Gifted martial artist, sure. Fight worth a damn? No way.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    31. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      You'd start the kick but never connect it, because the real fighter would have his fist out the back of your skull in the same time you try your magic technique that wins all fights.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    32. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      The evolution of a "martial arts master"

      1) Gets ass kicked in the schoolyard.

      2) Decides he needs "karate" or god help him, the most esoteric Chinese martial art out there.

      3) Goes to tournaments, gets a honorary mention for his kata form

      4) Makes mistake of thinking his secret fighting ultimate style will help him in a bar. Gets kicked around very bad.

      5) Decides to take it out on students: Develops subtle psychosis where he psychs out his unwitting victims er students who pay for the privilege of being demonstration victims of a vicious throw into a wall or smacked hard in the xiphoid process with a punch (note that the student doesn't fight back for the purpose of the demonstration). Also, arranges for "drills" where he is pitted against a student in a very specific test of speed and skill which he's practiced far more, so he caroms his knuckles off the student's skull time after time, eventually intimidating and flinching the student and underlining his own bad-assness with his student population

      6) Believes in his own godlike status. Takes on guy in bar who does NOT fight in the specific way drilled in class, and gets his ass kicked by SUPERIOR STRENGTH AND SPEED. Tries joint lock on guy whose arm WILL NOT BEND. Tries kick the guy sidesteps. Connects with "devastating fight ending super move" and guy strangely does not fall but instead grabs master's head and drives it very very hard into nearest bar obstacle (counter, post, etc)

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    33. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Tai Chi is not "shadow boxing" as the basically > uninformative blurb the story links to states.
      > It's a legitimate martial art perfectly useful
      > for beating the crap out of people.

      The Ultimate Fighting Championships (UFC) and numerous other Mixed Martial Arts (MMA) events have demonstrated incontravertably the Tai Chi is
      not a legitimate martial art and is not useful
      for beating the crap out of people. Tai Chi is
      dancing.

      > Yes, it has it's solo forms, typically practiced
      > in slow motion, just as other martial arts have > *their* practice kata, and just as these other
      > martial arts have kata with partners so does
      > Tai Chi, as well as full out sparing.

      If your martial art has kata, it is bullshit. Only
      martial arts that are mostly randori/sparing with
      grappling allowed are any use in reality. UFC &
      MMA have shown this thousands of times.

      > Don't be fooled by the new age types teaching it > badly to Granny in the park, and don't take
      > lessons in it from any instructor not competent > to teach it *as* a martial art. They don't know > what they're doing.

      Fundamentally, Tai Chi is dancing. Chi is a useful
      tool for extracting money from idiots.

      > That said, any robot that can go through a Yang > Long Form with me is a *major* step forward in
      > humanoid robotics. Hell, it takes a great deal
      > of practice and training for a *human* to do it > vaguely properly and I want to see this puppy
      > in action.

      Any similarity to dancing is purely coincidental
      LOL

      > I wonder how it would do in "pushing hands"?
      > That would be the ultimate test.

      Yes. We all know that the ability to do "pushing
      hands" is an excellent indicator of fighting
      ability AND chi development. How can supposedly
      intelligent people believe in this shit after the
      last 15 years of martial arts history?

      > KFG

    34. Re:I'd only point out that. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must compliment you on your excellent trolling technique! Much style and grace. Much better than heavy-handed "judo sucks!" troll style!!!

  25. My Asimo style kung fu is unbeatable by gelfling · · Score: 5, Funny

    Crouching diode hidden step motor.

    1. Re:My Asimo style kung fu is unbeatable by lhbtubajon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure you mean:
      Crouching diode hidden servo.

      Cause, I mean, no way an advanced robot uses stepper motors.

  26. Robots replacing humans? by reynolds_john · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "as these robots could be used to perform dangerous work."

    Just think, eventually they will be able to perform all kinds of work, not related to dangerous occupations.
    Certainly they will end up being cheaper than the human worker over time.
    I look forward to the day when robots are able to do nearly everything we pay manual labor for now. Then what the hell will we do? What will spurn our economy? Will the average blue collar worker work for the robots instead?

    Animation replaces actors/actresses, robots replace blue collar workers, etc. etc. It certainly will be interesting to know what an ever-growing population will do with themselves, and how our economy will change in the next 100 years.

    Every company (and even our President) wants us to run purchase more and more, but the jobs are decreasing as we're replaced by efficiencies through technology. I guess in the end we'll just ask one another, "Would you like fries with that?"

    1. Re:Robots replacing humans? by Ace905 · · Score: 1

      "I guess in the end we'll just ask one another, "Would you like fries with that?"

      You don't think a robot can do that?

      --

      Ace
    2. Re:Robots replacing humans? by feepness · · Score: 1

      Every company (and even our President) wants us to run purchase more and more, but the jobs are decreasing as we're replaced by efficiencies through technology. I guess in the end we'll just ask one another, "Would you like fries with that?"

      No, in the end we'll just be asking each other "Would your Robot Master like fries with that?"

    3. Re:Robots replacing humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess he's never seen Back to the Future 2... :P

    4. Re:Robots replacing humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll design robots. Or be robot mechanics. Or get other jobs.
      As for CGI replacing human actors, unless text-to-speech software improves by several orders of magnitude soon, we'll still need competent voice actors for a long, long time. And we'll need animators to animate the stuff. And artists to make the models/textures/skins to use. And writers. And of course, the creative talent to put it all together into a film. And ad writers/artists to advertise and sell it. If anything, those jobs will grow as the tech becomes cheap/commonplace and becomes easier for the average joe to make and sell pro-quality movies and special effects.
      Luddites went nuts over the same thing back when the automatic loom was invented. Guess what? They got other jobs. New jobs were created. Existing jobs increased in demand. Life (and the economy) went on. The exact same thing happened when every other major technology came into common use (trains, cars, planes, computers, the internet, computer-generated special effects, plastics, records, movies, electric lights, the printing press, television, etc.). I can't think of a single major invention that destroyed one type of job while not creating new ones and/or increasing demand for existing jobs.

    5. Re:Robots replacing humans? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      we will have to grow out of an economy.
      No money.
      It seems sureal, but if everything need to run a country is automateed, what do we need money for?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Robots replacing humans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm more concerned about the political implications.

      Once a country can accomplish its goals using robots, what use has it for citizens? Why not kill them off and replace them with robots?

      I expect this experiment will be tried by a dictatorship sometime in the next 150 years.

  27. Now that it has mastered tai chi... by malloci · · Score: 1

    it should be able to learn how to do the laundry, clean the dishes, fix dinner, and clean the house relatively easy.
    Excellent...

  28. tai chi by phantomwolph · · Score: 1, Funny

    the best line of defence if you are ever attacked in slooow motion

  29. Ok, I know you're going for the joke, but. . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    if it's so easy to lift one foot, raise one arm, reeeeaaaaaaal slow, why does it seem so hard for me to get a human student to do it without falling right over?

    This is a *major* advancment in humanoid robotics if they've actually pulled this off.

    KFG

    1. Re:Ok, I know you're going for the joke, but. . . by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

      if it's so easy to lift one foot, raise one arm, reeeeaaaaaaal slow, why does it seem so hard for me to get a human student to do it without falling right over?

      Is this a riddle? I know! Because you only teach one-legged students.

  30. Segway? by peterdaly · · Score: 2

    Too bad they are blocking useful research tools like Google. Otherwise they would know the Segway "scooter" beat them to some of these technological feats.

    Can a human ride on the robot's back and still have it sense and adapt to changing surface angle...like the segway.

    On the other hand, the segway doesn't do tai chi.

    -Pete

    1. Re:Segway? by Xtraneous · · Score: 2

      True, the segway does not do tai chi, but you are forgetting the fact that this new 'tai-chi' robot is a biped.

      --
      .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  31. I wonder.... by brandonY · · Score: 2, Funny

    if performing tai chi is one of the dangerous jobs that the workers could have.

    1. Re:I wonder.... by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

      Have you every tried some of those advanced moves? I always said that kind of stuff shouldnt be done by humans.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  32. They better not ad any AI... by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 2

    or else this robot may learn Falun Gong and they would have to kick its ass.

  33. Who ya gonna call? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    GhostBustersRobots!

    Let's see the Tai Chi robots take on Slimer!

  34. Why not merge technologies? by jafiwam · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now if I could get one of the tai chi robots to clean my toilet and do other household tasks, oh, and a better exterior would be nice....

  35. DEAR SIR, WE REGRET TO INFORM YOU THAT YOU SUCK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0




    This post intentionally left blank.

  36. With 2 billion ppl... by SunPin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They couild take over the world without robots.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  37. Reputible? by Chris+Canfield · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A less than one page press release, uncorroborated on the Net, that says that Tai Chi is a form of shadow boxing and that this thing will "Play" Tai Chi? All I can assume that means is that it is capable of moving a second limb in order to balance a first limb, without any sort of major locomotion, but the author's grasp of the subtlety of Tai Chi seems a little tenuous. With the broad scope of this posting, it could be the next revolution in computing or a new program for the Sony Aiboman.

    Can anyone find another source for this story?

    -C

    --
    This Sig is a mnemonic device designed to allow you to recognize this author in the future.
    1. Re:Reputible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible that the press report was translated (poorly) from the original chinese

  38. You kiddin' me? by minitrue · · Score: 3, Funny

    You wanna go around rescuing people from earthquake rubble on a frikkin' scooter?

  39. why not? by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    That's what I did last year.

    and the year before...

    and the year before...

    and the year before...

    Ok, maybe you've got a point.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With metachris as my role model, 2003 is looking bright already.

  40. Yup. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And she needs to look like this. Anatomically correct? Well, that kinda just goes without saying. . .

  41. Shadow Boxing...FROM MATEL! by Zapaanese.Whore · · Score: 1

    So not to sound crass or disrespectful to the 'shadow boxing' arts (sorry, sorry, I couldn't resist, I mean good lord, SHADOW BOXING?!), but if you had two of these things going at it and one of them hit the other in the head, does it's head go "SPROING!", extend another foot and suddenly stop moving? :D

    - Z

    --
    There's a fine line between genius and stupidity. Genius has limits.
    1. Re:Shadow Boxing...FROM MATEL! by Herz · · Score: 1

      Eh..It's

      --
      In vino vici
  42. Jeff Goldblum... by snilloc · · Score: 2
    ... appears to be doing Tai Chi...

    (Courtesy of the SNL Celebrity Jeopardy skits - No, I couldn't resist.)

  43. play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly do you "play tai chi" as the article puts it?

    1. Re:play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be the translation, in certain contexts the word for 'do' in chinese, literally means (in english) 'play'.

  44. Thank god I've been rescued... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... AAAHHHH, SPACE ROBOT!

  45. Sister Roboto by SunPin · · Score: 1

    An old friend from U Florida built Sister Roboto which can beat the crap out of anything small. MP>> This was years ago. The Chinese have some catching up to do.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  46. It's not the first time for Tai Chi & robotics by AnMai · · Score: 1

    Tai Chi's pushing hands (not sticking hands as this article says) has been used before [news.bbc.co.uk], and someone seems to think the Sony SDR-4X can already do it [www.tokyodv.com].

    Even though the SDR-4X doesn't look like it's doing an awful lot (apart from walking and vaguely "holding the ball"), it's at least got better structure than half the people hawking videos ;-)

  47. I Will by KillerKane · · Score: 1

    Defeat your Tai Chi with my Ctl-Alt-....oh, nevermind....

    --
    There is a thin line between genius and insanity. I have erased that line. -- Oscar Levant
  48. Uh oh.... by cpthowdy · · Score: 0

    I think we had better get that Robot Insurance (http://snltranscripts.jt.org/95/95foldglory.html) now before they start learning Tae Kwon Do.

  49. Foundation for modelling body movement by NewAccount · · Score: 0

    Tai Chi is an excellent foundation for reproducing basic human movement! Although there are walking robots around, they tend to imitate specific legwork, as opposed to (humanoid?) total body movement. I imagine any martial art would do, but the rapid movements of most martial arts would add unnecessary complexity. For practical usage, I imagine using an insect model would be better than an odd upright primate, though. The question is will Disney sue over infringement on Animatronics copyrights?

  50. OK... by Mac+Degger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I see lots of disparaging comments on this one. But I remember seeing Asimo (the Honda robot...please, no SFII jokes) in action and thinking "Jesus, look at that!". Imagine Moore's law applied to that.

    Asimo already looked pretty much like a granny in slightly slo-mo. Now add taichi into the mix...that's a complex balancing act most humans can't even do (try it once, before you joke about it...stand on one leg, have the other in the air to the front, put both arms to the side of your body that has the leg in the air...what, you fell down? That's why it's hard. Now add movements to it, all the while balanced and controlled. And sloooow. Get it now?).

    I tell you, the Japanese and the Chinese have a big thing here...hardly anyone in the west is taking this seriously (excluding some at for example MIT who are considered slightly strange), and consequently the west will have a HUGE disadvantage when housekeeping robots come out in ten, fifteen years time.
    And this time, they're not kidding; look what's been done in 5 years time...from barely crawling (infant) to selfsufficient, internal powersource, full balance, near full range of motion (granny). The processing power is there, now it's just a matter of application and cost. And products like Aibo (which I hate, too) will cover dev costs.

    This is a bit of a ramble, I know (champange has that effect on me :P ) but hear this: robots (Asimov's, to be precise) are coming, and the Aseans have a lead on the rest of the world because they took the long view. They have the patents because they took the time and money to develop something not deemed feasable...but looky here, it's slowly but surely turning out to be not only feasible, but thanks to Aibo (and production robots like the ones FIAT makes &uses thanks to the Asians) profittable too.

    Thank god someone had the foresight...my IIIc made me feel I was living Star Trek, the next Asimo might make me think I'm living in Asimov's world. I love technology :)

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    1. Re:OK... by videodriverguy · · Score: 1

      Seconded - you make some very valid points.

      As I'm in China working for an online entertainment company, I see every day the sort of long term thinking and planning that they use here (e.g. look at the latest maglev trial run - 8 minutes for 18 miles from city centre to airport). It might be connected to their respect for older and wiser people.

      China has one of (if not the) highest growth rates in the world. And it's doing this against a background of a poor global economy - imagine what it could do with a good one. For a good analysis, read this .

      Given the West's incredibly short term view (IMHO badly wrong), I expect their growth rate to continue. Their internal market is so large they can afford to look at the long term.

  51. Karl Marx was actually prescient . . . by kfg · · Score: 2

    in several regards. He fully foresaw the time when the "problem of production" was fully solved. He actually forsaw the problem this would present for a capitalist industrial economy and pretty much asked all the right questions. Unfortunately he came up with pretty much all the wrong answers. Went a bit loopy at the end too.

    The point of the matter is though that it's been quite a while since virtually all rote labor has been able to be performed by robots better than humans. It's been the humans that have been insisting on continuing to do this mindless, and pointless, labor in order that they may have "a job."

    This last is just one of the symptoms of a social atmosphere based on humans as machines and their output as "the economy." Me, if a machine can do the job, I *don't want it.* Really, just kill me now if you have to. I'd just curl up in a ball and die of ennui anyway if forced to perform such laborious, yet mindless, tasks.

    So what the hell do we do when the machines are doing all such tasks, as I believe they *should*?

    How about what humans do better than machines? Think.

    Maybe then we'll start to realize that the value and the purpose of a human being isn't to be a robot.

    There's going to be a shitload of "shakeout" before that comes to pass though. Batten down the hatches.

    KFG

    1. Re:Karl Marx was actually prescient . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      1/ People don't line up for mindless labor just so that they can have a "job" - they do it so that theyv'e got enough cash to eat and afford a place to sleep.

      2/ Humans think better than machines ? Depends on your definitions. Computers don't think, but they can do calculations really quickly. And the average joe in the street barely thinks at all.

  52. Excellent... by qat · · Score: 1

    Yea wow this robot would be pretty excellent. Great, However I have a question :). How could this be applied to a real life scenario? I mean, can this robot crawl? What stops magnets from messing it up? Or maybe an EMP attack? (Yes, I was watching Oceans 11 last nite, sorry :-\). I suppose it could aid in a bomb threat situation, but why would it need to know Tai-Chi? Oh well, ignore my pesismisticism (is that really even a word? :-P), I just think that too much money is being wasted on stupid shit.

    --
    Pls No Negative Modding!
  53. this is not news by ScubaS · · Score: 1

    this is all talk without proof of concept. they aren't the first ones to create a robot, and I have yet to actually see this in action. if they are simply trying to stifle competition, maybe they aren't really paying attention to what the competition has already done. im sure a robot that can walk on its own and keep its balance is the last thing on the list of things to do. I'm surprised they havn't tackled AI first, which would save alot of time on the movements and such. Much less, if it could even have a good eye sight, then it would be ok; but as far as it looks right now, they appear to be static pre-programmed robots that have to know the environment before it can actually work. it would remind me of a little toy that jumps around, when it gets tipped over, would look all retarded trying to jump on it's side, only spinning around in circles.

  54. Even cooler bots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These bots are gonna be a lot cooler than any Tai Chi bot could ever hope to be. DARPA intends to conduct a race of autonomous ground vehicles from the vicinity of Los Angeles to Las Vegas in 2004. A cash prize will be awarded to the winner. The purpose of the race is to encourage the accelerated development of autonomous vehicle technologies that could be applied to military requirements. Many of the details of the race are being developed. New details will be posted to this web site as soon as possible.

  55. Robots will never do Tai Chi (Tajiquan) - Why? by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some facts:

    Robots can't do Tai Chi, they can only *mimic* Tai Chi movement...why?

    Tai Chi (also called 'Taijiquan' - meaning "body as fist") is a legitimate martial art that has been bastardized in China and the West; it has also become something of a New Age phenonenon.

    Why can't a robot do leigitimate Tai Chi? Because training in authentic Tai Chi involves exercises that essentially, over time, 1) dramatically retrain muscle fascia; 2) develop enormous leg strength in the practitioner (necessary; 3) teach the practitioner that *all* movement is controlled from the center (this is where the New Age people get it wrong, as we're talking about *literal* control from the area - front to back - just below the belly button (dantien). This latter quality is what's hard to imagine until one meets a practitioner who has it right. There simply aren't many of these people left, and those who are left tend to be very restrained about teaching everything openly.

    Here are some good, authentic places to start - everything below is the 'real deal':
    http://www.sixharmonies.org/

    http://www.neijia.com/

    Others to look for:
    Chen Xiao Wang
    Chu Tian Cai
    Chen Zheng Lei
    Wang Xian
    Chen Qingzhou

    Anything done by any of the above is the 'real deal'. There are also other good practitioners in other 'styles' of taiji. The above group is form Chen Style, the first Taiji style.
    Zhu Tian Cai
    The reason that Tai Chi exercises are performed slowly is to train the body to move, resting on very strong legs, and allowing the "center" to "leverage" the ground for striking and other martial moves. It's virtually impossibelto describe what this quality 'feel's like. There's no mystery to it however, as it can be trained to various levels depending on the physical ability and dedication of the practitioner.

    Unfortunately, there are too few authentic Tai Chi practitioners out there who are teaching the "real deal".

    Good Tai Chi practice doesn't have to be martial, **but the quality and basics of correct movement HAVE to be present** for it to be called legitimate Tai Chi.

    Simply doing Tai Chi 'forms' fluidly is not doing Tai Chi.

    In sum, the real physical dynamics and requirements of Tai Chi cannot be simulated by a robot. A robot may *mimic* moves that look like Tai Chi, but that's all.

    1. Re:Robots will never do Tai Chi (Tajiquan) - Why? by ralphus · · Score: 1
      I wish i had a couple mod points, to me, you appear right on about what Tai Chi really is. Most people seem to mistake what Tai Chi is and it has been bastardized. I myself had fallen under the illusion that Tai Chi was nothing more than Asian stretching, but my eyes were opened wide several years ago when my wife began studying under a real Chinese master. It is rather amazing, the master is a small ancient woman with such power and focus that 3 strong guys can't move her from a stance!

      show me that you stupid robot!

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    2. Re:Robots will never do Tai Chi (Tajiquan) - Why? by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons it's laughable to hear about a 'Tai Chi Robot' - what a joke!

      The real irony is that the Chinese - starting with the Communist Chinese - have done more to discredit the real thing than anyone else.

      What your wife is experiencing is working with someone who has mastered 'rooting', or 'grounding'.

      It's a very small part of what Taijiquan is, at base.

      I've had some exposure to the best people (not much, but enough to know the difference), and believe me, they are amazing!

      I know one Chinese martial arts practitioner who is tops in his art. He sparred (full contact)with Chen Xiao Wang several years ago, and came away saying that Chen was the best martial artist he had ever encountered.

      The real pity is that there are many people who know just enough to impress someone with partial skill, and that's OK, as far as it goes.

      However, if your wife ever gets a chance to see one of the people I listed (or go to the web sites I listed and check out other top people in different Taiji styles), she will be pleasantly surprised.

      Again, there's no New Age magic in what the best practitioners do; rather it's mastering an astounding series of very intuitive and counter intuitive exercises that develop exceptional movement or - if one wants to take the pain (the Chinese call it 'eating bitter') and spend the time - fighting skills.

    3. Re:Robots will never do Tai Chi (Tajiquan) - Why? by ralphus · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I do not practice Tai Chi or claim to know as much about it as anyone who has studied for some time. I do know, however, that it is much, much , more than simple movements or basic forms, and I just gave one example of how my wife's master astonished me. The entire art is pretty amazing. I will be sure to show this thread to my wife to hopefully help in her studies.

      --
      Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
  56. What they need to concentrate on... by mtec · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...is a robot that practices and reproduces the sacred movements of the ancient art of get beer

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  57. I dunno about modding the robot... by Akardam · · Score: 2

    It may know Kung Fu, but will it remember Feng Shui? I mean, what is a balancing robot without Feng Shui?

    1. Re:I dunno about modding the robot... by edbarrett · · Score: 1

      You must defeat Sheng Long to stand a chance.

  58. Does it Follow Asimov's Rules? by rigga · · Score: 1

    Just curious if this robot is programmed to follow the rules layed out by Asimov. Or if anyone even thinks that they apply to this type of robot. It is after all programed to perform Martial Arts.

    --
    RiGgA
    1. Re:Does it Follow Asimov's Rules? by axxackall · · Score: 2
      Asimov rules are correct but very incomplete subset of buddhist rules. It is possible to prove that the following to Asimov rules will drive to a catastrophe or at least to comic situations (read Stanislav Lem). First of all, Asimov rules do not have higher order rules, controling how to improve Asimov rules.

      That's why I suggest to program robots to study buddhism before teaching them any social activity (especially before Martial Arts).

      --

      Less is more !
  59. Try it bub by jacobjyu · · Score: 1

    If you think Tai Chi is simple to do, go out and find a class and try it yourself, you will be blown away by how hard it really is. It's not just "Life one foot. Raise an arm." It's more like

    Get down into a low stance with one foot nearly off the ground and balancing all your weight on one leg, get up using only one leg while keeping the lifted leg straight, jump and do a kick over your lifted leg and land on your kicking leg without falling over... etc etc

    Basically, the movements in Tai Chi are superiorly difficult to probably any robot test ever created; the movements require a lot of balance and strength (well, i guess strength isn't an issue with the robot, but balance surely is). It all comes down to this, if the robot can do Tai Chi at a master level, it can probably do anything else that requires balance, from other martial arts (yes, Kung Fu, Aikido, Ninjitsu even) to walking and saving people while an earthquake is going on.

    A robot doing tai chi will prove its balance, not unlike if a human trained in tai chi, he will also have an acute sense of balance.. now to train a robot to actually feel its inner chi, that's a different story..

  60. i like yoga better by somniac · · Score: 1

    get in touch with your spirtuality and meditation and inner peace

    --
    somniac
    "They that would sacrifice a little liberty for temporary security, deserve neither." - Ben Franklin
  61. Here's some videos by PowermonkeySquared · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's some videos...

    http://www.tokyodv.com/news/RoboDex2002SDR-3XSon yb ot.html

    --
    Eating is for wimps.
  62. A bit ironic by vudufixit · · Score: 2

    It's interesting how Westerners have been adopting bits of Eastern philosophy and spiritual practice (Tai Chi, Feng Shui to name a couple), without their cultural context, often mindlessly aping the movements and ideas found in Dummies books or some television guru's show. Now the Chinese themselves are taking this to an extreme with their robots, in effect completely decontextualizing the significance of Tai Chi movement.

    1. Re:A bit ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the Chinese themselves are taking this to an extreme with their robots, in effect completely decontextualizing the significance of Tai Chi movement.

      The Chinese are actually the worst offenders in this regard. Once they figured out that they really goofed by ejecting all the real Buddhist martial artists (read: the only ones worth mentioning), they've tried to backpedal by sponsoring "wu shu" and other assorted crap that's supposed to be real martial arts. Now these people bandy about their various forms of the arts without the values context that Buddhism originally provided the martial arts. The arts as they teach them are really more of a state sponsored tourist trap now. It's pretty sad.

      I suppose that won't hurt anything. Let them continue to believe that all those confusing moves in the forms are actually some sort of secret attack instead of a prayer or symbolic truth. That way, they'll waste all their time practicing some idiotic theoretical moves that will leave them completely defenseless in real situations. Until they get their collective heads screwed on straight when it comes to allowing personal freedom of religion, that's exactly what they deserve.

  63. Finally... by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 2, Funny
    After decades of useless industrial work, each doing the work of a score of human workers, robots are finally doing something worthwhile: Tai Chi.
    My Goals For Robots:

    [ ] Jump rope
    [ ] Play tag
    [ ] Play Frisbee
    [x] Do Tai Chi
    Almost brings a tear to your eye... I can finally check this one off on my list.
    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  64. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus - its 00:54 here in the UK, the start of a new year, and I'm here posting an anonymous non-troll on Slashdot.

    Good start to the year, things can only go downhill from here....

    ...BANG......

  65. next breakthrough: buddhism by axxackall · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Balanced robots? Too mechanical, nothing unusual. I expect a better breakthrough in this area: computer OS studiing (zen?) buddhism.

    Seriously. People without buddism kill other people or other living beings or bring other forms of suffering to other people or to other living beings. Such people live their lives without high-order goals (what's the goal to get many money if you loose them after your death). Even most of religious people (especially ones of religions based on dogmatic principals) are not usually tolerant to people of other reliogion confessions.

    But once computers becomes actors in our eco-systems (computers now can decide on our behalf) then I would prefer to see such actors being peacuful, tolerant, non-violent, living their "lives" for good, loving and respecting other living beings.

    We don't want to have computers with "ego" - living their "lives" for themselves (and killing us as their competitors or using us as slaves). But also, we don't want computers as stupid slaves, living their lives for "ego" of particular group of people (they would become solders-killers).

    Of course, forcing computers to study buddhism should not free us (people) from the same job. We also must be peaceful, tolerant, respectful, loving and non-violent. Unfortunately many of us are not. And that't the real problem.

    --

    Less is more !
    1. Re:next breakthrough: buddhism by A+coward+on+a+mouse · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're comparing the Buddhist ideal to the realities of other religions. *Professing* Buddhism doesn't preclude making war on others any more than *professing* any other religion does. There are pacifists within all or nearly all religious groups, and typically those pacifists claim that they are following the true teachings of that religion.

      *Maybe* the pacifist element of Buddhism is currently more influential than the pacifist elements of Judaism, Christianity, Islam, and Hinduism. Even so, Buddhist countries have made war on each other and others at many times in history, for example the two wars fought between Siam and Burma in the late 16th century.

      I can't see how Jesus', Rabbi Akiba's, or Ibn Hallaj's (any pacifist Hindus out there pitch in) teachings are any less anti-war than the Buddha's. Frankly, you have already taken the first few steps onto the slippery slope by implying that Buddhism is the only way to peace. It's only a few short steps from there to the statement that all non-Buddhists should be destroyed as threats to peace.

      In short, the virtuous in each religious group have more in common with each other than the wicked within each group have in common the virtuous. None of the world's major religions is inherently more or less virtuous than another and they have all been used as excuses for atrocities.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine.
    2. Re:next breakthrough: buddhism by axxackall · · Score: 2
      Frankly, you have already taken the first few steps onto the slippery slope by implying that Buddhism is the only way to peace. It's only a few short steps from there to the statement that all non-Buddhists should be destroyed as threats to peace.

      Not at all. Buddhism let you to run any number of "virtual machines", each with another religion. You should practice it each time when it brings a peace, instead of continous arguing with other religion curriers.The other situation when the other will ask you questions about buddhism - you are happy to answer them as it will improve the knowledge of other people. But don't force them. That's the main difference of buddhism from other religions. As for wars, they are the subject of goverments, which are places for people who want a power, which is the goal of the material world and thus has nothing to do with buddhism (or with many other religions). When you are called for a peace - it should be, first of all, the peace in you soul, your thought and your actions.

      That wasn't argueing for buddhism, but more an explanation. Speaking about other religions for robots, I think that there are three serious objective problems:

      • Robots can study Cristianity or Islam, but will cristian or muslims like it?As far as I understand, buddhists have more chances to understand such movement and to avoid of calling it evelish or anything like that.
      • Robots study cristianity or islam, but what branch? There are ongoing conflicts between Catolicism and Ortdox Church, between sunits and shiits.
      • This specific robots are supposed to be the product of China Republic, the country where you can go to jail for other religions. Buddhism is ok.
      Again, no ofense to other religions, especially that robots can "natively" (more natively than humans) run different religions in different "virtual machines" simultaniously at the same time - right by buddhism rules.
      --

      Less is more !
  66. no one said anything about martial arts... by djupedal · · Score: 2

    Tai Chi (there are many forms)...loosely referred to as a physical exercise regimen that involves paced breathing and body movements with the goal of self energized mental and physical well being. For many practicioners the focus in doing them is not, first and foremost, martial, but as a meditative exercise for the body.

    In the case of a robot, it is simply a scripted set of basic, slow movements meant to mimic a human, and thus allow an audience to be able to identify with a machine on something more than a level that only requires an on switch. Sony's 'bots play soccer, and shake hands, as an example. Tagging that message as insightful is a joke, and clearly indicates the need for mods that allow for sarcasm :)

  67. Umm, a robot has NO chi! by ralphus · · Score: 1

    nuff said...

    --
    Revolutions are never about freedom or justice. They're about who's going to be top dog. -- Kilgore Trout
    1. Re:Umm, a robot has NO chi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word - Chobits!

    2. Re:Umm, a robot has NO chi! by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      You've never heard of Chia Pets then =)

  68. Then Aerobic and Karate robots? by giaguara · · Score: 1

    Tai Chi is something you do to get energy and stay in shape. First most human physical work was substituted with robots, but now also the sports can be done by robots? Great. I think i still want to do Tai Chi by myself.. so can i find Aerobic or Karate robots somewhere? I don't enjoy those sports so the robots could do those sports for me..

  69. Will the Chinese eat them? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like they eat their young?

  70. But not as amusing as. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    your post, little one. Feel free to come back and play again, my son, but maybe you should wait until you've advanced to a stage somewhat beyond zygote.

    At least learn to read first.

    KFG

  71. Re:OK... [OT] by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

    This is off-topic, but I completely agree. I remember one time walking past the Tai Chi class at my local school (they were doing chi-gung on one of the grassy commons), and I overheard a couple of football-jock-wannabe types commenting on how they could easily kick the shit out of anyone who studied such a pansy-ass martial art.

    I asked them to stand on the ball of one foot (not flat-footed, but on the ball of the foot) and extend their other foot out while keeping their hands at their sides. They couldn't even stand on one foot, and I think they realized that it takes a bit more talent and strength to perform Tai Chi.

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  72. Hong Kong Working On Its Own Robots by sunspot42 · · Score: 2

    In response to China's development of Tai Chi robots, Hong Kong announced today it's busy developing Feng Shui robots.

  73. More Info (direct translation from CCTV) by AtomicBomb · · Score: 3, Informative
    CCTV is the major state TV station in China. They have just run a
    Taichi Robot story last night. It has a nice photo. The text is in chinese. I don't want to spend too much time for translation. So I just add a few extra points. The university names are my direct translation. They are unlikely to be the correct spelling... I am not a native Mandarin speaker.
    • BHR-01 is a 158cm tall humanoid robot, developed in the 863 national technology advancement programe .
    • BHR-01 weighs 76kg. It has 32 degree of freedom with extra dexterity around the hand and foot joints.
    • Main contributions: improved system integration and gait control.
    • The second country developed advanced non-tethered humanoid robot.
    • Recent advancement in robotics:
      • Security robot (demostrated on Dec 2002), capable of walking up/down stairs/uneven terrain, very flexible hand, can be remote controlled/ in autonomous mode. Targeted application: explosive disposal and handling of armed offender.
      • 12 joint biped robot developed by CheungXua Defense University, capable of moving like a ordinary human (eg move sizeward and other acrobat like movements).
      • Beijing Aerospace University: robot hand capable to handle objects with vastly different texture and hardness.


    I am not sure when/how did you do the search. I find
    many links related to the posted story, although the content is more or less the same in everyone. It is not at all surprising. The reporters duplicated the official press release from englishdaily.com.cn. In a sense, Chinese is similar to Japanese. Many of these news are not for "export". They just publish the stories in their own language. You really cannot say it does not exist until you search in their own language (if you can...)

  74. Chi-Sau by MoogMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I do Wing Chun (Ving Tsung) which is a little like Tai Chi. It'd be cool if someone created a machine that was a little like a Mook Yan Yong (Wooden Dummy) with moving arms and AI encorporated, so it could do basic Chi-Sau. I find that most of the time I have no partner to train with. Of course, it'd take a lot of work to recreate the pressure sensitivity etc, but im sure some bored person could do it...

    1. Re:Chi-Sau by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do know what you're talking about, but I don't think a robot will be able to help you with chi sau in the very near future. Remember that sensitivity involves using all the senses, including the ones we may not acknowledge that we possess. A human, though unaware of his or her potential, at least has that potential. A robot is a very simple thing compared to a human being and has very little potential. It therefore also has very little that we can "listen" to in learning sensitivity. I believe this is especially important at higher levels of training.

  75. nice article. by buttahead · · Score: 1

    It almost has some real details. I can't wait for them to get some pictures and links to the real info.

  76. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's what they're telling the press. In truth, they're teaching the internal forms of Tai Chi to a monster robot in the hopes that it will eventually become the greatest kung fu warrior ever and will destroy that traitor Jet Li who abandoned his country for Hollywood. After that, China will create an army of kung-fu androids so that they can destroy arrogant America's military dominance in the Pacific region. Oh yes.

  77. maybe this is all part of the chinese plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey lets build minion robots. program them to kill. we can have the robots attack Americans and
    hack government computer systems. it seems to me
    that it is in the United states best interest to build there own minion robot before they get their
    butts kicked by Honda's "osimo" and "china bot".

  78. (fa!)Re:maybe this is all part of the chinese plan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See what I mean?

  79. Ohhh next can we have seizure robots =) by kitsch · · Score: 1

    Ohhh next can we have seizure robots =)

    YAY!!

  80. Falun Gong Hackers, anyone? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

    I wonder how the Chinese Government will feel if it gets hacked by Falun Gong, and reprogrammed to do their exercises? >:o)

    --
    Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  81. The important part... by tech_m0nkey · · Score: 1

    I think the important part of this whole entire Tai Chi thing is that this will make the average home robot of the future much more nimble. It won't take a whole minute to climb 5 steps of stairs, and even uneven ones won't need too much extra programming. All this even when our ChiBot is delivering our breakfast in bed for a wonderful new years day. :)

  82. Re:ATTENTION: by meta.chris · · Score: 1

    Ok,

    i just got in. it's 3:24am EST.

    It wasn't the greatest new years eve, but i had a good time - got to see a bunch of good bands, drink my share of Yuengling Lager, and hang out with good folks.

    Nonetheless, I wish you all a good 2003. Please follow your heart, and do that which needs to be done.

    Peace and Love

    metachris

  83. It has to be shown . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what would Mike Sigman think? (laugh, dammit!)

    Taiji really is a kick-ass martial art. It was one of the primary arts practiced by Chinese bodyguards, among others who needed serious fighting skills. You practice moving slow to learn and develop control. In the street you move fast, and the other guy goes down. kfg is right---what that New Age lamer reaching gramma in the park is *not* taiji. That's just a dance.

    Happy New Year,
    Thump

  84. I only part agree with the rigged comment... by NateKid · · Score: 1
    The bitch position sucks dick :), but the Gracies are very capable fighters. I train at Renzo Gracie's School and he's a cool guy as well as a bad motherfucker. In Japan his arm was broken in a fight against Sakuraba (my hero), you could totally see it, but he didn't tap out. In fact at least 4 Gracies (Helio, Royler, Renzo, and Royce) have broken major bones during fights (3 of them to Sakuraba) and didn't tap out. The whole clan's got some major balls.

    Now I personally don't like Royce Gracie's overuse of the Guard (the bitch position) and I find it hypocritical that his self-defence book doesn't contain even one instance of it. But the idea of the guard is that it's the best position to be in when things go wrong and you're on bottom. None of the Gracies has any problem with taking guys down, GETTING ON TOP and then punching OR arm barring them into submission. It's just that fights don't always work that perfectly...

    In summary, Gracie Jiu-Jitsu is about doing what works...get positional dominance first and then have your way with your opponents (sounds gay I know). It doesn't even discount groin stuff and eye-gouging, it just argues that you're better off doing them from a position of dominance. The thing about having mats and no nasty stuff is that it prevents the fighters from being brutalized more then they have to be (and having known many winners and losers trust me they get brutalized aplenty). But yeah, it does have the nasty side-effect of popularizing that bitch position :(...

    1. Re:I only part agree with the rigged comment... by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: None of the Gracies has any problem with taking guys down, GETTING ON TOP and then punching OR arm barring them into submission.

      That's funny, I've never seen a Gracie do anything remotely like that. They either 1) stand next to the person in a big hug until the other guy tires and the clock runs out or 2) go into the "bitch" position and wait for the other guy to make some kind of move, hoping he'll make a mistake.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    2. Re:I only part agree with the rigged comment... by NateKid · · Score: 1
      I never saw Rickson Gracie do that. The Gracie you're probably thinking of is Royce Gracie, who did pull guard (aka go into the bitch position) a lot of times. But if you look at the size of the guys he was fighting (he was only ~170 lbs at the time) it's understandable. And the fact is that he did take most of his opponents down and pound the fuck out of them.

      Also, the bitch position, though I'd never pull it on concrete or in jail is a position of decent power. When used aggressively (a great example is in Frank (not Ken) Shamrock's destruction of Tito Ortiz several years back) it definitely has its merits. You can use your hips to weaken the top man's punching ability as well as gain incredible leverage for submission holds.

      You have to keep watching the family. There are a lot of Gracies, with many distinctive styles. Some of them are cruel bastards who enjoy knocking people the fuck out...Now my favorite fighters aren't Gracies (except Renzo Gracie who's school I go to :)) but I give most of them much respect. After all even though Royce abused the bitch position he still won... Nate

  85. In related news... by oren · · Score: 2

    The pet rock company has announced the availability of a robot capable of performing zen meditation. This is an upgrade of the intelligent pet rock (capable of obeying commands such as "kill" and "play dead"). Owners of pet rocks can install the upgrade at a special price of 0.00$ (limited time offer).

    The company is working on adding a third function (ornament in a rock garden), to be released at an unspecified time in the future.

  86. Re:Credible? - You didn't look very hard... by SailorBob · · Score: 2
    I've looked on Google, Yahoo!, and even tried to find the information from other sites containing news from the source AFP [afp.com] (which the site credits the information from) and there is literally no other even mention of this robot on the web. I can't help but wonder about the credibility of this article.

    You must not have looked very hard:

    China builds tai chi-playing robot (same article, different site)

    Un robot imitant la boxe chinoise (from google cache)

    Article in Chinese with PICTURE

    Another Picture

    China construye un robot que practica el taichi (Spanish, I think)

    Chinese invent martial arts ready robot It can also surf the Internet, maybe

    New Robot Developed in China (with Picture)

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

  87. Sounds like you might need some.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's KAMA, not Karma.

  88. Robots will benefit from Tai Chi and surpass it by Morgaine · · Score: 2

    In sum, the real physical dynamics and requirements of Tai Chi cannot be simulated by a robot. A robot may *mimic* moves that look like Tai Chi, but that's all.

    It's possible to interpret your words as meaning that an authentic Tai Chi practitioner can harness some magical force or hidden power of the universe which is not available to the world of physics and technology. If so, we have no point of contact for a reasoned argument, since I don't subscribe to the concept of souls or mystical essenses.

    If on the other hand what you mean is that Tai Chi is so exquisitely tuned to the needs of the human body and mind that a robot could not really duplicate it, simply because it is not made of flesh and blood, then I agree completely. However, notice that a robot would not need to do so anyway. A Tai Chi master at his or her peak is ultimately just a near-perfectly balanced machine, and such a state of power, readiness and competence can be the baseline specification for the robot at design time. Furthermore, once the robot is up and running then it can fine-tune its behaviour beyond that design baseline. Such robots will appear in time, as it's really just an engineering problem to be solved.

    So, assuming that we're talking about the physical world and not something mystical, robots will indeed not really do Tai Chi as you say, that is true, but they will benefit from humans practicing the art, and then surpass them inevitably.

    Having said that, the future is rosy not bleak, since mankind is on a path of self-transformation in which he integrates fully with his technology. Ultimately we'll all benefit from the work of Tai Chi masters, and to some extent carry their accomplishments within ourselves.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  89. Tai Chi Robot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the reason they chose Tai Chi is because Tai Chi is a martial arts that emphasizes balance and complex movement. I think its a fine start before you start doing all sorts of fast robotics..

  90. Free-standing autonomous biped by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Honda is already on the second generation; iirc, ASIMO is their name for it.

    Enby in Waltham
    So glad to see "breathe" spelled correctly in an earlier post.

  91. Oops, I left out something! by archivis · · Score: 1

    The point of my post was supposed to be that we need to give robots martial arts forms suitable for high-tech weapononry. This will greatly improve their world-dominating potential.

    Man, I've been up all a couple nights and a day - it shows...

    --
    In July O7, I got a mac pro. There's no punchline. Just endless joy and wonder.
  92. We have a martial arts equivalent. . . by kfg · · Score: 1

    of napalm. It's called, are you ready for it? Napalm. Using napalm is a martial art.

    You seem to have missed a key concept somewhere along the way.

    KFG

  93. The rest of the morning routine? by jbrownc1 · · Score: 1

    Now if they can just make them do my situps and take a dump for me, they'll have my entire morning routine!

  94. Attack is inevitable by nhavar · · Score: 2

    The Chinese have picked the perfect plan.
    1) Develop a weapon out in the open.
    2) Desguise the weapon as something people will like or might find useful and that's trendy(robot).
    3) Program the robot to fight in a style that most people think is very slow, thoughtful, and for old people.
    4) Mass produce and SELL SELL SELL.
    5) Send millions to a wearhouses all over the United States for "storage".
    6) Send the signal for FULL SPEED MODE.
    7) Mass destruction and KILL KILL KILL.

    I say we nuke them before they get their "weapons of mass destruction" plan under full steam.

    --
    "Do not be swept up in the momentum of mediocrity." - anon
  95. A haiku by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dear slashdot posters
    your ignorance amusing?
    your trousers are down.

  96. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    It looked like something resembling white marble, which was
    probably what it was: something resembling white marble.
    -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...