Slashdot Mirror


Toshiba To Show Laptop Fuel Cells at CeBit

war3rd writes "According to The Register, Toshiba has finally been able to build a fuel cell for laptops that they will unveil at CeBit next week. The fuel cells are expected to last approximately 5 hours and are compatible with existing lithium-ion batteries. Form factor remains the only issue. The trick is that they use the water by-product from the cell to dilute the methanol source as it enters the reformer, and are therefore able to store higher concentrations of methanol in the cell. My only concern is how quickly can they get this to market?"

292 comments

  1. Performance by jaavaaguru · · Score: 0, Funny

    Finally we'll have a PC that can last as long as an iBook without needing mains power :-)

    1. Re:Performance by asv108 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      My fujitsu lifebook p-2000 gets 5 hours of real battery life with the extended battery and up to 12 with two batteries. Let me know when your iBook can do that!

    2. Re:Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is your processor stepped down? Yeah, I thought so.

    3. Re:Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When Apple notebooks reach 2 GHz speeds (a couple years from now) then we'll see how they do with power. Most of the thin, light PC's using Celerons clocked at 1.2GHz or slower are comparable to Apple battery lifetimes.

    4. Re:Performance by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      In that case, how long will the iBook run on it?

    5. Re:Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had one and there was very little change in processing power. It uses the transmeta crusoe processor which is awesome. Uses very little power, quiet, and small.

    6. Re:Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really? I gotta get me one. My processor makes WAY too much noise.

    7. Re:Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How much is your processor stepped down? Yeah, I thought so.
      I thought we were comparing to iBooks.
  2. Hehehehe ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... I can see it now ... some poor geek on the side of the road with a sign ... laptop out of gas, help please ...

    hehehehe that makes me smile

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  3. SHOULD be ethanol by nweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you want a fuel cell to be practically usable, you should make it run on 40% Ethanol, 60% water. That way, there is a commonly available fuel (Vodka) which can be easily purchased most everywhere in the US (outside Mormonstan at least).

    If you can make the fuel cell deal with more impurities, you could also use Whiskey or Tequila or similar distilled spirits.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by SlightlyMadman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh god, I'd never manage to refuel the thing to capacity!

      "... And one fur the doktuuur ..."

      On second thought, a laptop battery would be much more covert than a flask, for sneaking liquor into a club.

      --

      Money I owe, money-iy-ay
    2. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know you are a drunkard when you start feeding booze to your laptop.

    3. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Cruciform · · Score: 4, Funny

      In Canada, 80% to 90% of the cost of a bottle of hooch is taxes. Vodka power would be bloody expensive. Then again, if you power the user with vodka as well, they're less likely to complain :)

    4. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sorry sir, you must be 21 with 3 IDs to purchase fuel for your laptop.

    5. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by hping · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I can call this misusage of said fluids, but in case of emergency I can accept this usage.

      But think of this line: Well, officer, off course I have a drink with me, because I use it for my computer!

    6. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Can anybody say Bender? "If you won't drink for yourself, won't you at least drink for your friends?"

    7. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny

      A two liter bottle of cheap vodka, some porno and three AOL cds. I don't know what you had in mind for tonight, but leave me out of it.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    8. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by dextr0us · · Score: 1

      LOL never heard mormonstan before

      --
      "Martha Stewart can lick my Scrotum......do i have a scrotum?" -- Sharon Osbourne
    9. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > A two liter bottle of cheap vodka, some porno and three AOL cds. I don't know what you had in mind for tonight, but leave me out of it.

      Hey, a fella could have a pretty good weekend in Germany with that.

    10. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by DarklordJonnyDigital · · Score: 4, Funny

      Warning: Do NOT drink your laptop.

      I guess this is what they mean when they say alcohol is a Gateway drug...

    11. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Yes it should.

      Then the farmers in the midwest can grow more corn and get that powering the laptops.

    12. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess Futurama (with its lovable alchohol fueled robot "Bender") wasn't wrong... :-)

    13. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by FireAtWill · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh great. Here in Indiana we can't buy alchohol on Sundays. I'll have to take my laptop to a bar ("Barkeep! I'll have a Jolt on the rocks and a vodka martini for my little friend...").

    14. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      I'm sorry sir, you must be 21 with 3 IDs to purchase fuel for your laptop

      That's still easier to get than an Indiana driver's license.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    15. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Uart · · Score: 1

      Yet another reason to bring your TiBook to Mardi Gras!

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    16. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Orthanc_duo · · Score: 1

      I understand methanole is quite corrosive.. ie. youre not alowed it in plane cabins, has to be transported specially like other corrosive materials. Think this would add considerablbly to the cost of methanole. though prob not 80%

    17. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by BigMajor08 · · Score: 1

      I don't know what kind of club you go to, but I certainly hope any bouncers of the clubs I go to would beat up people and then throw them out of line for trying to carry a laptop battery inside with them.

    18. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by brakk · · Score: 1

      I was in Montreal last October and I remember the price of alcohol being about the same as it is here in Oklahoma (adjusted for the exchange rate of course).

    19. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by voot · · Score: 1

      coulnt you use denatured achocl? that should be tax free and therefor alot cheeper, and if you try to drink it you will throw up and other bad stuff

    20. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by Skevin · · Score: 1

      > coulnt you use denatured AcHOCl?

      I don't know whether Actinium Hydroxylchloride is even affordable.

      Solomon

      --
      "Twice half-assed makes an ass whole." --Solomon K. Chang
    21. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by gordguide · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in Canada you can legally make, purchase, or use Ethanol for Fuel use, free of all taxes. You don't even need a permit (as in the US) or any form of regulatory permission.
      Just do it, and don't drink it.

    22. Re:SHOULD be ethanol by voot · · Score: 1

      it should be because here in the united states they do not tax on that sort of stuff, i was talking about it in science a few days ago

  4. This is all nice but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it plays DVD?

  5. All we need now... by swordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It'd be nice if the component makers would establish an "open laptop" form factor. We've alreadt got mini-ITX. We just need a chassis/monitor and DC power specification.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:All we need now... by Junta · · Score: 3, Informative

      The answer is that there is nothing in it for them. Manufacturing for OEMs means they have more control over the market and can get more cash per unit. The hard drives, optical drives, memory, CardBus, and mini-PCI all all standardized ways of manufacturers getting cash off the commodity laptop market. Meanwhile, the motherboards, case, power supply, battery, and display manufacturers make a killing by charging so much. Same reason Apple doesn't want clones, letting the market get too open and the prices start running down and eliminating profit margins very quickly. That is why PC laptops are almost as pricy as Apple laptops, and manufacturers recognize a good thing when they see it.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    2. Re:All we need now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you can tell your girlfriend, "do you want to play with my open laptop"....

    3. Re:All we need now... by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I would rather have smaller laptops than standardised ones. The size of a desktop gives to the flexibility to use standard components. To pack things in the smallest size possible, you are going to have to use custom components.

    4. Re:All we need now... by swordboy · · Score: 1

      The answer is that there is nothing in it for them.

      Then why is the desktop still open? Desktop parts are dirt cheap compared to laptops. WTF? I nearly paid $900 in order to have my Thinkpad LCD replaced before I realized that I could just go out and buy an IBM desktop LCD and disassemble it and use the SAME PART to fix my laptop.

      If there is a need, then some enterprising company will make money from that. If a fledgling desktop LCD maker comes along and realizes that they could partner with some mobo-maker and create the open-laptop form factor in order to boost their sales 20 fold, then they will do it.

      And their margins won't change, since they'll essentially be selling their desktop panels into the laptop market at desktop prices. They win and the consumers win.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    5. Re:All we need now... by Junta · · Score: 1

      The reason the desktop market is so open in the x86 world is because there is no way to go back once the path is taken. True, overcoming barrier to entry into the market might be a temptation for a fledgling company to try for a standard.However, market inertia in this case means the standard is useless. If only a small handful of no-name manufacturers stand behind a 'standard', the market used to big names would be too dubious of inexperienced newcomers. The fledgling company also knows that if by luck beyond luck the standard catches on and is widely adopted, the traditional manufacturers can start following the standards and drive the newcomer into the ground with their more efficient processes. Fledgling companies can see this and would rather play it safe and hope for big-name contracts rather than mass-market acceptance. That is my hypothesis, but IANABP.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  6. one for me one for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hehe, so now when i'm running low i can take some of my batteries 'energy'. ok but seriously how long until we hear a story of some one smoking thier laptop for it's menthol? lord knows i would

    1. Re:one for me one for you... by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      >> smoking thier laptop for it's menthol? lord knows i would

      Go for it! I'll start preparing your Darwin Award nomination now.

      (Methanol will kill you dead, AFAIK)

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:one for me one for you... by DuBois · · Score: 1

      Some people forget that ethanol (drinkable) ~= methanol (poison).

      --
      The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
    3. Re:one for me one for you... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) you misread this - it's methanol, not menthol.

      2) methanol is a poison. Low levels of methanol will permanently blind you. At higher levels, you'd be dead. "Denatured" alcohol is ethanol ("normal" drinkable, get drunk on alcohol) with very low levels of methanol. It's used in industrial processes. There's not enough methanol to screw up most reactions that require ethanol, but enough methanol to make it poisonous to drink so people wont use it as a way of avoiding government taxation.

    4. Re:one for me one for you... by Hrshgn · · Score: 0

      ... yes, and ethanol can even serve as medication, in case of methanol intoxication.

    5. Re:one for me one for you... by stickyc · · Score: 1

      What's with the alarmist "It's got unhealthy stuff in it!" rants about fuel cells? It's not like NiCad or LiIon batteries are a good nutritional supplement and all that wildlife friendly either, folks.

    6. Re:one for me one for you... by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Some people forget that there are drunks all over the world who don't care. Methanol poisoning is a real medical problem that crops up in inner city hospitals all the time.

    7. Re:one for me one for you... by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it's toxic, but so is ethanol. Methanol is mostly only toxic due to secondary effects. You can get drunk on methanol and feel fine... for a while. The problem is what happens in your body once it starts breaking it down.

      Methanol breaks down via alcohol dehydrogenase into formaldehyde and formate, which of course are pretty toxic. Ethanol breaks down into these things also, but the body does a much better job of breaking ethanol down more completely.

      The antidote for methanol ingestion is ethanol ingestion. Really. :) The ethanol has a much higher affinity for the dehydrogenase so it prevents the body from breaking the methanol down into toxic things.

      For this reason, if you drink something like ethanol denatured with methanol, you will probably not die, but only get very sick.

      Also, some commercial drinking alcohols contain small amounts of methanol, which is likely why you get more of a hangover when you drink cheap liquor vs. the good stuff, you actually slightly poisoned yourself.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:one for me one for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at that one as evolution in action. Exactly the kind of people we don't really need in society anyway.

    9. Re:one for me one for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other people forget that ethanol is still a poison, but just a mild one with enjoyable effects :-)

    10. Re:one for me one for you... by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Alarmist? Huh. Seemed perfectly non-alarming post to me. He just stated a fact: methanol is a poison. Nothing more, nothing less.

      Besides, methanol is probably extremely wildlife friendly compared to those batteries, poison to humans it may be, but it's still organic compound, and is created all the time in small amounts by natural processes, and will break down as well.

    11. Re:one for me one for you... by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      ethonal is also the treatment for antifreeze, you more or less put a person/animal into liver failure by injecting vodka right into the veins, the liver shuts down and the antifreeze just ends up getting pissed out or whatever instead of processed by the liver.

    12. Re:one for me one for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Drink up boys, it's getting dark..."

  7. Well, there goes the neighborhood by drblunt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Does this mean you won't be able to take your laptop on the airplane with the fuel-cell battery? Nothing like having a lap full of methanol to freak people out.

    Doc

    --
    We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
    1. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by jkusar · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing the battery itself doesn't have enough fuel to really cause any need for concern. What will cause the airlines to worry is the refill bottle that you'll need to carry (assuming the batteries are refillable. They'd be kinda useless otherwise.) A Few ounces in a battery isn't gonna do much damage even if it did leak. On the other hand, a full bottle of it exploding could cause some seriuos problems.

    2. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by mysterious_mark · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Why not, is not alcohol present on airplanes, on long flights you could order a vodka to re-fuel you cell, its almost enough to make me want to fly again. MM

    3. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Sitnaltax · · Score: 5, Informative

      Methanol on an airplane is hardly anything to worry about. It's no more dangerous than ethanol, which of course the airline will happily let you drink as much of as you want as long as you keep paying. It burns, but so does ethanol and paper.

      Explosion? Nah. It would be a very difficult task to get so much methanol vapor that an explosion would be much more than alarming pop--the same pop you could get by inflating a barf bag with your breath, twisting off the opening, and POPping it with your fist.

    4. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by TinheadNed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although I don't know about this particular fuel cell as it mentions more concentrated meths, one made by PolyFuel received air clearance and I think was mentioned on /. itself.

    5. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by br0ck · · Score: 1

      Why don't we have ubiquitous, easy power for laptops on jets yet? I saw what looked like a power socket on a United flight last summer, but didn't have an adapter. Actually, an article by David Strom from two years ago said that airlines were making progress but still had a long way to go. The article points to a list of laptop services (old?) provided by each airline.

    6. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by IAR80 · · Score: 1

      Thinking that they managed to hijack 4 airplanes with cardbord cutters that POP might be very intimidating mate.

      --
      http://ebgp.net/ccc/
    7. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Sgs-Cruz · · Score: 3, Funny
      I've said it before, I'll say it again. No American (I don't mean the company, I mean the nation) airliner will ever be hijacked again (well, not EVER, but as long as living memories of 9/11 exist.) If a terrorist with a freaking AK-47 opened up on a plane, half the plane would still rush at him. And they'd probably win - it's hard to take down that many people with any kind of weapon, when those people have nothing to lose.

      Let's get this back on topic. Realistically, can you really hijack a plane using a laptop fuel cell? "Everybody down, or I'm gonna bust this cell open, let the methanol evaporate for 20 minutes, and then light it, making a 'pop' noise that may be quite loud!". I think not. Of course, that's not to say that overzealous security standards won't let them on anyway, but I don't think they're a realistic threat to airline safety.

      --

      Karma: pi (Mostly due to circular reasoning in posts).

    8. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by kakos · · Score: 1

      Methanol is a low explosive, which means it just burns rather than explodes. In order for it to explode, it has to be in an enclosed space. In your fuel-cell battery, the concentration is too low to cause enough of an explosion to damage the airplane. I'd probably be more worried about the hair spray on the woman that is sitting in front of you.

    9. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, you see, that now you'll have morons willing to replace the (m)ethanol with something a tad more volitile, and it'll be easy to sneak on board.

      You have to think not just about the storage system in its INTENDED state, but also in its POTENTIAL states.

    10. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by addaon · · Score: 1

      Nerve gas and a gas mask? It wouldn't be that hard to disable a plane full of people. Never say never, even approximately.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    11. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever you can do with such a laptop, feeding the consumer fear of anything seemingly dangerous will help to mainstream the "secured" hardware stuff industry majors are preparing now : Hello DRM, Palladium and all the crap that comes along - Goodbye home assembled PC, and freedom of knowing what you're actually using to send mail.

    12. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely they will be using Regenerative fuel cells!

    13. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Even so, they then have so little to loose they may as well try and rush the hijacker anyway. I mean, they have more to gain by killing him fighting than dieing slowly in their seats.
      I also beleive that all cabin crews should be armed, and trained to use them.
      Still, I love that seminar idea...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    14. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by JPriest · · Score: 1

      RTFA. The technology is currently banned from air travel.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    15. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The United States does not base any of its air travel security measures on realistic threats. If you carefully observe the way airport security actually works, you will see that none of the measures do any real good. It is just as possible to get contraband aboard an airliner today as it was 5 years ago, or 20. The draconian "security" measures in place do nothing to provide real security; like locks, they only serve to keep honest people honest. If you're having trouble seeing this, think about it in terms of computer security - what does security really mean, and what are the principles?

      The simple fact is that US airport security measures are meant to be a security blanket for the traveling masses and nothing more. The mechanisms used to provide this blanket do indeed stop a great deal of harmless devices and substances from being brought aboard aircraft, and they do indeed subject travelers to extra scrutiny, delay, and humiliation. Realistic threats, however, are not a part of the planning process, mostly because meaningful action to reduce those threats would be extremely expensive.

      So, rest assured, you won't be allowed to take fuel cells aboard an aircraft. You will, however, still be able to forge identification, obtain a credit card to pay for your flight to avoid arousing suspicion, bribe a maintenance worker or disassemble and disguise your diabolical device to get it aboard, and die in some sort of blaze of glory, if that's what gets you off. Just don't try to talk on a cell phone after the door is closed, or they'll throw you right off the plane. The powers that be have their priorities, after all.

  8. but how long will they last? by Pompatus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My question is, how long will the battery hold up? I don't mean a single charge, I mean how long will the battery be usuable. Also, it states at the end of the article it will take 2-3 years to get to market. It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:but how long will they last? by cribb · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article

      you're new here, aren't you?

      --
      Hostes alienigieni me abduxerunt. Qui annus est?
    2. Re:but how long will they last? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Also, it states at the end of the article it will take 2-3 years to get to market.

      For Intel's version, yes. If you'd read the article instead of skimming, you'd see that Toshiba expects to start commercializing this next year.

    3. Re:but how long will they last? by Cached+Hit · · Score: 0

      why don't these posts get marked as redundant yet? just wondering.

      --
      "look ma! no hands!!!" - random amputee
    4. Re:but how long will they last? by jaxle · · Score: 1

      because that part of the article is refering to intels longer lasting fuel cell

    5. Re:but how long will they last? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Informative
      by Pompatus (642396): It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article
      by cribb (632424): you're new here, aren't you
      ,
      Actually, from your user IDs, it's obvious that you're both new here. :^)
    6. Re:but how long will they last? by easyfrag · · Score: 1
      It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article


      Don't worry, he'll get another chance to read it in a few days when its reposted

  9. This could have other applications by mozumder · · Score: 1

    Why stop at just laptops? Why not go straight to powering houses and cars?

    1. Re:This could have other applications by 0biJon · · Score: 1
      --
      ?Who controls the past now, controls the future.
      Who controls the present now controls the past.?
  10. Cool.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but will it run Linux?

    1. Re:Cool.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares what OS the battery uses. Though any would be overkill imo.

    2. Re:Cool.. by Cached+Hit · · Score: 0

      you just got trolled. repeat after me "I will not reply to six syllable posts containing the word Linux"

      --
      "look ma! no hands!!!" - random amputee
  11. Good luck... by szcx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure airlines or the TSA will be thrilled about people using fuel-cell-powered devices on those long-haul flights.

    1. Re:Good luck... by afidel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not, they already sell 40% alchohol solutions in greater quantities to anyone who wants to pay the couple bucks and allow liquid butane in larger quantities, both have at least as many BTU potential and in the case of the liqued Butane the conainer is activly designed to ignite the contents.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Good luck... by mscalora · · Score: 1

      What? At $5 per 1.5 oz of Vodka (http://www.skyguide.net/articles/200210/20021021_ ealert.html), I think the airlines will be happy to rent (empty) fuel cells!

      -Mike

    3. Re:Good luck... by linefeed0 · · Score: 1

      Well, in that case I'd be surprised that they allow Li-Ion batteries around, given that they have a tendency to spontaneously explode.

  12. Dumb question... by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I RTFA, but still have a basic question - how does one recharge the battery? Will you purchase methanol packs, or just pitch the battery and get a new one? Either way, that cuts into the "environmentally friendly" bit...

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Dumb question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mebbe instead of just RTFA, you should try to UTFA also.

    2. Re:Dumb question... by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

      The choice is, do you use a rechargable "hard battery" that has all sorts of nasty stuff in it that stays nasty even after the battery is dead or do you use a DMFC where what's left inside is water and maybe a little bit of unreacted methanol? My guess is that you wouldn't so much recharge them as maybe get them refilled. If they are refillable, that would mean they are much more environmentally friendly than traditional batteries (rechargable or not). If they aren't refillable, hopefully there is nothing too nasty left when they go flat and at worst you have a little extra junk at the landfill.

      --
      They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
      Ben
    3. Re:Dumb question... by endoboy · · Score: 1

      they're refillable.... Catalyst is about the most expensive stuff on on the planet; you wouldn't want to be tossing it out everytime you need a new shot of fuel...

  13. Better concept by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Make it run on atmospheric methane, and install a pay-per-use WAP in every Taco Bell.

    It'll like be like printing your own money!

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Better concept by grondu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Make it run on atmospheric methane, and install a pay-per-use WAP in every Taco Bell.

      Widely Available Phart

      --

      I'm the urban spaceman babe, but here comes the twist... I don't exist

  14. Re:But can you... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

    I'll bet a dollar the answer is ... NO.

    --

    Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  15. Problem with Security ... by airrage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ah yes, this will definitely get your through airport security?

    Rent-a-Cop: "Sir, you wouldn't happen to have a explosive gas in that laptop would you?"
    Slashdot-Geek: "Uh, no, duh -- it's a fuel cell laptop."
    Rent-a-Cop: "Riiiiiigggghhhhhtttttttttttt. Please come with me."

    Why do the chemists and chemical engineers keep coming up with such volitile compounds -- why can't we start fueling devices out of garbage like that dude on back to the future?

    I could be wrong --

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Problem with Security ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congress wouldn't allow devices that get power from discarded stuff that nobody wants - they'd be afraid of getting recycled.

    2. Re:Problem with Security ... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 0, Funny

      So pour the fuel cell alchohol out into the guard's little plastic bowl, and he'll let you pass. When you get on the plane, buy one of those tiny bottles of vodka, refill your laptop, and fire it up.

    3. Re:Problem with Security ... by dr2chase · · Score: 2, Informative

      Methanol != Ethanol
      Ethanol's what's in vodka, methanol is poisonous.

    4. Re:Problem with Security ... by BFaucet · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Marty, we just need to go to the year 2015 and bring back a Mr. Fusion power unit.

      --
      -Derick
    5. Re:Problem with Security ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      newsflash: ethanol is poisonous

    6. Re:Problem with Security ... by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Ethanol is also much more expensive as it is much more heavily taxed and regulated. You can get a little ethanol in your methanol bottle and nobody really cares but reverse it and it's a very big deal. That having been said, there's no reason why ethanol wouldn't work fine. The beauty of fuel cells is that they are multi-fuel beasties. They don't care where the hydrogen comes from. The reformer might care but the two molecules are so close that the same reformer might work for both.

      I bet you it voids the warranty though.

    7. Re:Problem with Security ... by chemmathguy · · Score: 1

      "Why do the chemists and chemical engineers keep coming up with such volitile compounds -- why can't we start fueling devices out of garbage like that dude on back to the future?" One of the major things about fuels is that they have to be volatile to react. Otherwise, no power.

    8. Re:Problem with Security ... by Lazyhound · · Score: 1

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/10/10/121721 2&mode=flat

    9. Re:Problem with Security ... by Gunnery+Sgt.+Hartman · · Score: 1

      Half the fun of designing something like this is seeing if it will explode. The shit needs to be highly volitile for an explosion to occur. Garbage is not volitile enough to make an explosion worthy enough.

      --
      [ ]
    10. Re:Problem with Security ... by 0x1337 · · Score: 0

      Garbage? You mean Uranium? Isn't that why the proff got shot-up in the first film?

  16. First Legitimate Post by ShadowDrake · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Runs for 5 hours" under what circumstances and configuration? I'll be downright impressed if they can get five hours out of a desktop PIV running full-blast, and running those drives full-time and the 802.11 won't help. I'd be impressed if the 'smart' battery/fuel cell realy was. My "10% low battery alarm" means anywhere from 5 to 30 minutes on a 2:30 or so charge life.

    --
    It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  17. Oh, and obviously denatured as well by nweaver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Making it run on 40% ethanol, 60% water, denatured with methanol (nondrinkable) also is good, for the "lower cost (no booze taxes), lower availablity" fuel.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:Oh, and obviously denatured as well by SUB7IME · · Score: 2, Funny

      Good call! We'd finally have a good reason to steal the ethanol out of chem lab ;-)

    2. Re:Oh, and obviously denatured as well by haystor · · Score: 1

      Will hack for booze.

      --
      t
    3. Re:Oh, and obviously denatured as well by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      Making it run on 40% ethanol, 60% water

      Bah!
      Won't a Mr. Fusion run that just fine?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  18. But Why?? by mgmatrix · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to carry METHANOL around with them?

    --
    Looking for something to do? http://www.grinion.com
  19. Usefulness? by mr_zorg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see. Now I can have a batter with a moderately longer runtime, but refilling it is much more difficult than simply plugging it in. Who's going to go for that? OK, it's cool. OK, it's environmentally friendly, but is that enough to overcome the convenience factor?

    1. Re:Usefulness? by reidbold · · Score: 1

      In short, yes. I don't see where the big inconvenience lies. My laptop is useless te me now because the battereis hold very little charge after a year of use, with the fuel cell this wouldn't be an issue.

      --
      -Reid
    2. Re:Usefulness? by dbrutus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You can carry around a bunch of $2 refill packs and not need to be attached to a generator out in the middle of nowhere. Now there's convenience. You can also recharge your power source in a minute or two.

      This is important for other uses like a prospective Segway using these things. Right now you run out of juice, it's time to get tethered to a wall socket but with this you just fill it up and go further.

    3. Re:Usefulness? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      Two reasons I can think of:

      1) You can refill in places where you can't get to traditional power, like an airplane or in your car.

      2) You can refill in just a couple of minutes. How long does it take to recharge the batteries on your typical laptop?

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    4. Re:Usefulness? by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      although this does sound very convenient, it results in an additional recurring cost of using your laptop. I would be interested to see a cost comparison between the amount of electricity required to recharge a laptop battery, and the cost of the methane refil.

      i'd be hesitant to tack on another frequent recurring cost on top of all the other ones (food, cigarettes, etc).

      Maybe if there were methanol fountains in public places? that would be cool.

    5. Re:Usefulness? by Garin · · Score: 1

      Nah. How long do you think it would be before there would be coin-op small-device refill stations everywhere, to serve the laptop and cell-phone geeks? Methanol would be cheeeaaaap stuff, like twenty cents or less per litre retail. So maybe you go to the refilling station, dial in a 250 ml fill, drop in a quarter (and curse those ridiculously high vending-machine prices), fill up your laptop, and off you go, good for another five or ten hours.

      Heck, even if it was the same price as gasoline it would still be cheap, considering how much you use. At home, you'll probably buy it by the gallon to fill up your own filling station. Offices will get it delivered just like jugs for the water coolers.

      Sure, the early adopters will have some annoyances, but I don't think it'd be too long before you'll see them at airports first... Shopping malls... Office buildings... Street corners... Remember, it's not just laptops, it's also cellphones and other gadgets that use the methanol.

      And no, this stuff isn't dangerous or volatile -- certainly no more so than vodka. I imagine the real-world implementation might have the methanol at a 75% (or lower) concentration, or something like that, to limit its flammability. Perhaps at home, you can fill with 100%, but in a public places they'll only serve up 75% to limit the danger. Whatever.

      I dunno, people will probably find all kinds of potential problems with my scenario here, but I have very little doubt that some enterprising entrepreneurs will find a way of addressing all the problems and getting it all to work.

      --
      In any field, find the strangest thing and then explore it. -John Archibald Wheeler
    6. Re:Usefulness? by FrostBYTEz · · Score: 1

      Just like all those AA and AAA vending machines and pay-per-charge electric outlets?

    7. Re:Usefulness? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Laptop batteries have their own costs. A quick check of Dells website shows them selling a battery for $130, which is advertised as being good for 500 charges. That works out to about 25 cents a charge, assuming that the cost of electricity is negligible. If a fuel cell can approach that cost per charge ratio and not wear out, I'd rather go that route.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    8. Re:Usefulness? by Garin · · Score: 1

      Um.. Are you serious? Where in the world are you that you can't find AA/AAA batteries practically everywhere?

      AA/AAA batteries are DEAD easy to buy at almost any kind of retail store I can think of! Now I'm saying that they'll just add in a methanol source as well. Maybe along side the rows of Duracells and Energizers in displays, there'll be pods full of methane like the butane cans for filling up lighters and stuff. Since it's just a liquid, I'm guessing that a coin-op will be the simplest delivery mechanism.

      If you're at home, you can plug into the power line to recharge your devices over night quite cheaply and easily if you have the time. In my part of the world (Canada), there's absolutely zero market for pay-per-charge electrical outlet, as electricity is so cheap that most places don't even bother covering them up (libraries, universities, etc). I can plug in anywhere. But, of course, the drawback is that it's a slow charge thing, so it's only useful if you're sitting in that one spot for an extended period of time.

      --
      In any field, find the strangest thing and then explore it. -John Archibald Wheeler
    9. Re:Usefulness? by Drakin · · Score: 1

      Isn't dangerious... unless of course, you ingest it... then it can be rather harmful...

      Oh well, stuff makes damn good gas line anti freeze in the mean time, without the water.

    10. Re:Usefulness? by skillet-thief · · Score: 1

      They have this new stuff out, called gasoline. It isn't really like a fuel cell, it takes a special kind of converter that involves explosions and a lot of turning. The advantage over plugging in is that it is easy to carry a lot of the stuff. When you run out, you just pour some more in and keep going.

      Two other great advantages:

      • The only by-product is some smoke (CO, I think, but I'll have to check).
      • It is derived from some stuff in the ground, mostly in the Middle East, so it's cheap and easy to get!

      Somebody should check this out! Do a google on it...

      --

      Congratulations! Now we are the Evil Empire

    11. Re:Usefulness? by Garin · · Score: 1

      Sure, but gasoline, lighter fluid, antifreeze, motor oil, drain cleaner, and all kinds of other liquids are poisonous too, and most people don't have a problem with them.

      With well-designed containers and filling system, the consumer need never be directly exposed to methanol in any form. It simply goes from filling station into receptacle (possible your own small personal storage flask, holding maybe 500 ml), and then from receptacle to device (a cell phone, a laptop, whatever). A good design can ensure that those transfers are clean.

      Not only does this keep Joe Moron from drinking it, it also goes a long way towards preventing spills, vapours, and other bad things.

      Yeah, it's not perfect. I guess pretty much all I'm trying to say with my posts here is that this is definitely possible to do well, if we're motivated to solve the problems.

      --
      In any field, find the strangest thing and then explore it. -John Archibald Wheeler
    12. Re:Usefulness? by xombo · · Score: 1

      Hey, they should make cars that run on ethanol gas!

    13. Re:Usefulness? by Nihilanth · · Score: 1

      good point, i forgot how limited the rechargeability of those things were. I suppose its more of a psychological difference than a material one.

      now that i think of it, walking down the street with a pouch full of methanol cylinders attached to one's belt -would- be pretty "leet"

    14. Re:Usefulness? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Actually you can run fuel cells on gasoline and the byproducts are much less noxious than when you burn it. It also might end up being more efficient since you don't have to lubricate a lot of moving parts along the way (no drive shaft, universal, pistons, etc).

      The entire point of President Bush's push on fuel cells is that the Middle East isn't cheap or easy. We end up having to compromise our principles and let ourselves overlook a lot of bloody repression to secure that oil and the money we pay for seems to fund more than sheikhs playing with toys.

      The more fuel cell uses there are, the quicker we'll get to that happy day when we can tell all the Al Queda funders to go pound sand.

    15. Re:Usefulness? by cowtamer · · Score: 1

      This may not be useful in the office, but when I'm flying, I almost never get to recharge my laptop. I would definitely buy & keep this around for those types of situations...now if I could only buy stock in the company ...

    16. Re:Usefulness? by anon*127.0.0.1 · · Score: 1

      I'm gonna wear them over each shoulder, bandolier-style.

      --
      I am NOT a man!
      I am a free number!
    17. Re:Usefulness? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically Bush wants to put the oil companies out of business?

    18. Re:Usefulness? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Nah, the world isn't that simple. The oil companies are all heavily invested into hydrogen. I just saw the CEO of Shell Hydrogen on the Nightly Business Report last night. The oil boys don't like bowing and scraping to despots any more than the next guy. With the technology maturing, they're all getting ready to make the transition and ensuring that they'll continue to be players in the next age.

  20. fuel cells run hot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Even with a good catalyst like a fuel cell has, the reaction that takes place has a temperature of several hundred degrees Centigrade.

    Sounds good for a little hot action on your laptop!

    1. Re:fuel cells run hot by IAR80 · · Score: 1

      I will certainly not keep this thing in my lap.

      --
      http://ebgp.net/ccc/
  21. Interesting... by md81544 · · Score: 1
    So now I'm going to be choking on the (admittedly quite small) CO emissions from my laptop as well as all the traffic.

    How do these things work? Do you really have to fill 'em up or are they sealed, disposable units?

    1. Re:Interesting... by dextr0us · · Score: 1

      dude its a fuel cell. its like .0000001 ppm

      --
      "Martha Stewart can lick my Scrotum......do i have a scrotum?" -- Sharon Osbourne
    2. Re:Interesting... by dbrutus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, that's CO2 emissions, not CO. At worst, you might feel a little light headed but in no way poisoned.

    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we need to clear up the perception that fuel cells are clean ways of producing energy. Sure, hydrogen and oxygen produce water, but how do you get the hydrogen? That's where the methanol comes into play. With a catalyst (and high temperatures), hydrogen is produced, as well as carbon byproducts. Hydrogen needs to be separated from the products with a membrane or sieve. If most of the carbon byproducts are elemental carbon, its gonna clog up whatever is used to 'purify' the hydrogen, shortening the life of the catalyst and separation unit -- which probably means most (if not all) of your fuel cell battery will be thrown away. If most of the carbon forms gases, you're only marginally better than using 'traditional' fuels (gasoline, diesal). Any process that produces CO2 produces CO as well. The process conditions and kinetics determine the ratio.

      So with the 'cleaner' fuel cell technology, we still get the 'greenhouse' gases. Only benefit I see is that there are less sulfur compounds in the emission, point source emissions can be cut if the hydrogen is produced somewhere else, and fuel cells don't have the stigma the internal combustion engine has. But hey, this technology is the hottest thing in R&D!

  22. Great... by gpinzone · · Score: 1, Funny

    A technology that lasts about the same time as a battery and will label you a terrorist when you board an airplane. Can't wait until these are out either.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Heat??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already, a big problem with laptops is heat. How much waste heat does this fuel cell produce. Looks like 40% is typical for large fuel cells, I wouldn't want to deal with that much more heat in a laptop.

  25. Refuelling is easier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cause it only takes a minute to throw some more fuel in (which you can carry with you) while recharging requires being tied to a wall power outlet for a few hours.


    besides, why not just use a Transmeta chip with fuel cell power? Then maybe you'll get 10 hours before refuelling.

    1. Re:Refuelling is easier... by briancnorton · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but where do you get fuel from? I get power from a socket.

      --

      People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    2. Re:Refuelling is easier... by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      It mentions "fuel cartridges," which raises a whole new set of questions.

  26. Ah, me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My only concern is how quickly can they get this to market?"

    Yes, dear slashdot editors, we're all aware of your growing concerns that you show in the last line at the end of each article.

    1. Re:Ah, me by BFaucet · · Score: 1

      It'll probably be in the "Best vaporware of 2003!" poll.

      --
      -Derick
  27. 5 hours work time by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

    5 hours of juice is about what my tibook gets now. After getting the mac I have never wanted for more battery time anymore. Now I want for CounterStrike though !!

    I would like my laptop fuel cell to run on jet fuel. That way I could just pick it up at the airport on the tarmak.

    1. Re:5 hours work time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how all the Apple owners tell us all about their 5 hour battery life. Of course, if you take a modern PC laptop clocked as fast as an Apple, then it will last that long too. Look at the ultrathins by Dell and others that use Celerons @ 1.2GHz.

      Of course, PC notebooks running at 2GHz and above won't last 5 hours. But neither would an Apple, if they could actually get it up 2GHz, which won't happen anytime soon.

      I'd rather have a fast PC notebook that gets 3 hours of battery as opposed to a slow POS Apple. Hell, what takes 3 hours on a PC takes 5 hours on an Apple anyway!!

    2. Re:5 hours work time by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      Jet fuel is also known by another name, kerosene. You could do it with a different reformer but the question remains, why?

  28. Not that great by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fuel cells would be great replacements for non-rechargable batterys, but not rechargables. Think about it. You hate to recharge your laptop, but you'll hate it more if you have to pay for fuel. You pay for electricity, but you don't usually think about it. You also don't pay for it if you charge your laptop at work. Yes, one way or the other we all pay for it - I'm talking about noticing it.

    1. Re:Not that great by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      This is going to find applications in rural or out in the field settings. A jug of methanol good for 10 charges is a lot cheaper than the equivalent in lithium/ion battery spares. Both will get you through a week in the woods but why spend the extra money?

    2. Re:Not that great by horza · · Score: 1

      Think about it. You hate to recharge your laptop, but you'll hate it more if you have to pay for fuel.

      I hate even more being stuck on a 6hr train journey and the battery dying after 2hrs.

      Phillip.

    3. Re:Not that great by Big_Breaker · · Score: 1

      Methanol is very cheap. You could probably buy a liter for ~ $5 and have a thousand hours of computer time.

      The real issue isn't the fuel but the lifespan of the fuel container and DMCA style restrictions on refilling it.

  29. Re:I haven't posted here in ages by jaavaaguru · · Score: 1

    I guess you've never heard of a cross compiler o QT then. I can write software using a Mac running OSX that will run on your PC and look like any other windows GUI.

    That's what open standards and file formats are all about.

  30. More details? by Animats · · Score: 1

    OK, how good is this as a fuel cell? Can you hook up a fuel tank and run it as long as the tank is kept full? That would be great for emergency power applications.

    1. Re:More details? by DuckDuckBOOM! · · Score: 3, Funny
      Can you hook up a fuel tank and run it as long as the tank is kept full?
      [snort] I just got a visual of some ubergeek with one of those stupid hats made to hold dual beer cans, two bottles of methanol in place, tubes running down to his laptop...

      ..actually, one can of methanol and one of beer wouldn't be bad. As long as you remember which tube is which.

      --
      Life is like surrealism: if you have to have it explained to you, you can't afford it.
    2. Re:More details? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      GM is angling to sell its fuel cell cars to the 3rd world on the explicit promise that it'll give them electricity too. Ride around in it during the day and power up your home lights with it at night.

    3. Re:More details? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      So why arent they angling to sell them here in europe. London- I am sure that the government could be talked into giving 100% discount(if they dont already) on congestion charges, and other tax breaks for small form factor fuel cell based cars.
      It would make London that much more bearable...

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    4. Re:More details? by dbrutus · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that they'll be marketing them all over the planet. It's a major car platform. It's not ready yet though. I doubt that they'll be pointing out the generating ability of the cars in the UK though because the whole country is already wired, isn't it?

      The point is that this stuff is actually getting close to being practical for transport without further subsidy. They're openly talking about deployment in 5-7 years with mass changeover starting the middle of the next decade.

      It's neat stuff because depending on the reformer used, the cars are highly adaptable as to what fuel they use. They can get hydrogen from gasoline, methanol, ethanol, natural gas (methane), or straight hydrogen among other fuel sources (one car show recently featured a hydrogen fuel cell car powered by borax, no kidding). All this means that not only will the ME potentates get knocked off as the kings of energy, but nobody else is going to be able to climb into their vacated chairs as the newfound ease of switching to other fuels kills energy suppliers ability to threaten destructive price spikes.

    5. Re:More details? by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Its funny you say that. Although in the cities everyone is wired, I know people who live out in the moors on Bodmin. All their power is from two windmills and a genny. They actually have two power lines through the house (I love this) - one is for 240vAC, the other 12vDC. Its a very old house mind - and there is not another house for about a mile.

      Equally I know one guy, a robot builder,hobbyist engineer and just generally geeky who lives in an adapted fitted out double decker bus on his own land (acres of it) in Cornwall. He also runs of Gennys, a small windfarm, solar panels. He already ended up in the local paper after extracting a binliner full of hydrogen and igniting it - the local villages all heard it. The guy also happens to live around the corner from the Eden Project.

      Anyway - living in built up London- I still must have backup power - as it does have its bad periods. And I dunno about a car - but I will be investing in fuel cell based UPS for my servers.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  31. Re:5 hours? by BFaucet · · Score: 1

    I could be wrong, but you should be able to use the fuel cell to power your laptop making it 9+ hours (I don't know what system toshiba's estimates are with.)

    --
    -Derick
  32. Mmmmm Methanol..... by smoondog · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the methanol safety card. I don't see these on airplanes anytime soon. Anyway, remember those old photocopies from the 70's/early 80's that made pages with blue text? They always smelled a bit and came out a little wet. Yup, methonal was the fluid used in them....

    -Sean

    1. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Ah yes, the heady aroma of the mimeograph.

    2. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by sliph · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely unlike the alternative right? I doubt it would be too hard to package methanol into safe, disposable, self-sealing packages.
      At least methanol doesn't ignite when it comes in contact with air.

    3. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by frostman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those old photocopies were actually mimeographs, generally referred to as "dittos" (though I think there was some difference between a "ditto machine" and other mimeographs).

      Even though we had a photocopier, large runs went on the ditto machine, and it was always a mysterious and magical thing to operate. I miss them.

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

    4. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your point. Surely you're not talking about Lithium Ion battery cells right? Do you have any knowlege of chemicals or battery cells?

    5. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Here is the safety card for ethanol. Guess we won't be seeing that stuff on airplanes either, will we?

    6. Re:Mmmmm Methanol..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf, you stupid shitlicking moderator, that's what it was called.. sheesh, can't even be helpful anymore, some moderator might crawl up your ass.

      fuck you.

  33. If I recall correctly... by edashofy · · Score: 5, Informative
    The DOT has already approved Methanol in small quantities for uses such as powering fuel-cell powered laptops, see here.

    You "recharge" by popping in a new cartridge of methanol, which should be cheap ($3-5 initial starting price, probably down to $0.30 eventually. You don't actually have to plug the laptop in for a few hours to recharge it either, so on that long airline flight you can run the laptop indefinitely with enough little cartridges. I saw a pic of a prototype cartridge once somewhere, it looked about the size of a AA battery.

    1. Re:If I recall correctly... by JPelorat · · Score: 0

      Gimme a break.. airlines don't even let you have nail clippers these days, they're sure as hell not going to let you bring little packets of flammable liquid onboard.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    2. Re:If I recall correctly... by briancnorton · · Score: 1

      Are these cartridges refilled or disposable? If so, do they need toxic handling like Alkaline batteries?

      --

      People who think they know everything really piss off those of us that actually do.

    3. Re:If I recall correctly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gimme a break. You're too lazy to do a Google search before you start shooting your mouth off.

    4. Re:If I recall correctly... by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Oh come on now, .30 a cartridge? You don't think they will start making propriatary fuel cartridge design ala inkjet printers and charge us at least a buck a pop?

    5. Re:If I recall correctly... by John+Paul+Jones · · Score: 1

      Gee, like the butane lighters that I've carried with my on every flight for the past 8 years?

      The horror!

      --
      Feh.
    6. Re:If I recall correctly... by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      actually the last time I flew they took my lighter away ... bastards how am I supposed to smoke on the plane ?

    7. Re:If I recall correctly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matches?

    8. Re:If I recall correctly... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Actually you can carry nail clippers on a plane in your carry-on bag. The TSA web site has a PDF listing all the items that you can pack in your carry-on bags and your checked bags:

      http://www.tsa.dot.gov/interweb/assetlibrary/tsa _p pitems.pdf

      Many of them surprised me because of all the press about certain basic items that were "supposedly" illegal.

  34. Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by w42w42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't Hydrogen the desired fuel for a fuel cell? I may be wrong, but I thought that anything besides pure hydrogen would have additional exhausts besides just warm or hot water.

    If that is the case, I am not sure why I would opt for this, being that it 'only' gives me five/six hours run time between refills.

    That's another point - buying refills for every six hours use is a little bit more cumbersome than just plugging your laptop into the wall and charging the battery, even though the battery will not last as long.

    1. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by limproach · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hydrogen is the preferred fuel, but it is unstable and difficult to work with. Methanol (which is easier to handle) can be used in conjunction with a reformer, which basically extracts the hydrogen from the methanol.

      At that point, it is the same thing as a normal fuel cell, just a bit less efficient

      HowStuffWorks has a good explanation about it http://science.howstuffworks.com/fuel-cell.htm

    2. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct in that Hydrogen is the only fuel that lets out water vapor as its only by-product. Any other fuel has carbon dioxide (and possibly carbon monoxide) as byproducts. Insert Global Warming debate here. I don't think at these levels you'd have to worry much about the ice caps.

      The main problem is that hydrogen has a very low energy/mass ratio. The only way to get anything even close to a decent range is to have massively compressed hydrogen. This in itself is a hazard. If you see a fuel cell in a car, look at how much cladding they have on that hydrogen tank. You're not going to have that kind of hydrogen tank shielding on something meant to be portable. Methanol is the simplest chemical that is liquid (and therefore relatively dense) at room temperature that they can use in a fuel cell.

      The other big problem is hydrogen is very reactive - read explosive. Probably not a good idea to have explosives on your laptop.

      Also, its easier for you to refuel methanol than to refuel hydrogen. There's no hydrogen infrastructure. Not much of a methanol one either, but you probably could get methanol if you looked for it.

    3. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Water vapour is also a greenhouse gas. More importantly, by burning hydrogen we lose oxygen from the air rather permanently. Unless of course we generate the hydrogen from water by electricity, in which case the hydrogen only acts as a cumbersome and expensive battery.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by dhovis · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Methinks you may be missing the point.

      A fuel cell IS a battery. It is a refillable battery. One of the biggest anoyances of rechargable batteries is how long they take to recharge. That is the reason (well, one of them) that electric cars have never become popular. If you run out of juice, they take HOURS to recharge.

      With laptops, this problem is not so bad. You can use a laptop while it is recharging, and most places you would want to use a laptop, you will be within range of a plug anyway. Still, there are times when I would like to be able to run unteathered for long periods of time. So whenever the fuel cell gets low, you just add some more methanol and in seconds, you're good to go for another 5 hours.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    5. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one side note: Hydrogen gets lost into space because of the high speed h_2-molecules have at room temperature and below. More than earth's escape velocity. Not wanting to be the big environmentalist here, But.... shouldn't we think about that problem BEFORE we start using hydrogen as a fuel for laptops, cars and other things?

    6. Re:Methanol vs. Hydrogen ?? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I agree a fuel cell (with fuel) is effectively a battery. Just wanted to point out that it's not as perfect environmentally as it's sometimes portrayed, albeit it's probably better than petrol-based fuel engines. With a battery you also need some source of energy to recharge/refill it.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  35. Recharging by ralico · · Score: 1

    If you are flying, at least you would be able to recharge your laptop. Might even be healtier, tomato juice for you, vodka for your computer.

    --

    SCO to Hell
  36. New LAW the CUI by nlinecomputers · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coding under the influence.

    Honest officer I was just fueling my laptop.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
    1. Re:New LAW the CUI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One for you... One for me... One for you...

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. Fuel Cells ehh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my day we had to use crank generators... We cranked for 5 hours to get 20 minutes of DOS prompt... sweeeeet DOS prompt

    1. Re:Fuel Cells ehh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool! you just had to hook it up to a treadmill and let your horse do the work! What! You didn't have a horse? What did you use to pull your buggy?

    2. Re:Fuel Cells ehh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hooked it up to your butt plug, what else?

  39. Um, what's the point? by Visigothe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As others have pointed out, 5 hours on a laptop is *nothing* The batteries on my iBook do that just fine. Sure it takes me a couple of hours to fully recharge, but that's what a second battery is for, should I need one. Also, I don't have to refill, nor throw away spent fuel cells. It sounds like manually refueling would be a pain in the arse [for a laptop]. Vehicles using fuel cells sound much more interesting

    What would be interesting would be a fuel cell laptop that got maybe 24 hours on a "charge".

    This just seems like gadgetry for its own sake

    .

    1. Re:Um, what's the point? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Run a mobile celeron at 1.2 gig, you get 5 hours of battery life there, too. Or maybe 10 with fuel cells.

      Being able to change batteries in your laptop the same way you would a gameboy is a vast improvement over the norm, no matter what hardware you run.

      Enough with the elitist apple crap, already. Or go sit somewhere all alone with your Mac and tell yourself you have all the innovation you'll ever need.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Um, what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love how all the Apple owners tell us all about their 5 hour battery life. Of course, if you take a modern PC laptop clocked as fast as an Apple, then it will last that long too. Look at the ultrathins by Dell and others that use Celerons @ 1.2GHz.

      Of course, PC notebooks running at 2GHz and above won't last 5 hours. But neither would an Apple, if they could actually get it up 2GHz, which won't happen anytime soon.

      I'd rather have a fast PC notebook that gets 3 hours of battery as opposed to a slow POS Apple. Hell, what takes 3 hours on a PC takes 5 hours on an Apple anyway!!

    3. Re:Um, what's the point? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Informative

      Given the battery life of an iBook, adding a fuel cell to an iBook probably means you could extract 8 or 9 hours.

      Don't tell me that wouldn't be convenient, with a recharge being as simple as swapping methanol cartridges.

    4. Re:Um, what's the point? by Lao-Tzu · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, sure, anything that takes 3 hours on a PC takes 5 hours on a Mac. Like watching a DVD.

    5. Re:Um, what's the point? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Being able to change batteries in your laptop the same way you would a gameboy is a vast improvement over the norm, no matter what hardware you run.

      Do you really think carrying a bunch of "batteries" is really more convenient than just recharging things? I took an underwater camera that used AA batteries on a dive trip and I can tell you that carrying along the 24 batteries I thought I might need was far from "convenient".

      The way things are now I can "fill" my laptop just about anywhere for free. I can plug in at an airport or hotel, then get a few hours of use here and there. The thought of paying even $1 a refill pretty much sucks as far as I'm concerned, I never really wanted to have to budget a special amount per month for "laptop charging". I can already see that I'd end up plugging the thing into the wall most of the time to avoid using up the cartridges... so then what is the point of even owning a laptop? That's why i opted for a laptop with good battery life in the first place, so I wouldn't have to plug in all the time.

      I do like the sound of the longer battery life in some cases (like on a plane), but I think overall fuel cell batteries have pretty specialized uses and will never be very widespread. Unless you can make them replace normal batteries by using the same form factor and being just as disposable... then they could replace normal batteries if they offered better performance.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    6. Re:Um, what's the point? by Visigothe · · Score: 3, Informative
      Quoth:

      Given the battery life of an iBook, adding a fuel cell to an iBook probably means you could extract 8 or 9 hours.

      Don't tell me that wouldn't be convenient, with a recharge being as simple as swapping methanol cartridges.

      While ~10 hours is cooler than 5, I don't think it is that much better [yes, technically it is *double*]. For it to make sense, it would need to last 20h at minumum to convince the majority of manufacturers and users to make the switch. It would also be nice to not have to throw away a spent cart.

      It's a value proposition. Can companies make more money by switching to the fuel cell technology? My guess is that it isn't at this time. Maybe in a few years when everything gets smaller/faster, but not now.

      I still think fuel cells in cars is a better idea than laptops.... of course now we're talking about a completely different fuel.

    7. Re:Um, what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, but is your Lithium battery the size of an AA cell and weights only a couple ounces?

      Fuel cells get that amount of power from an extremely small and light cell. LiIon's are very large and heavy.

    8. Re:Um, what's the point? by endoboy · · Score: 1

      the point is:

      First--the status quo:
      say you've got your handy-dandy laptop, and are about to go on a trip. Assume that your battery weighs about a pound. Now, you decide you're willing to carry two pounds, so that you'll have more power. How much power do you gain by doubling your weight in batteries?
      2X power = 2x weight. Suppose you need to run for 10 times as long--you're up to 10 lbs.

      Now, for the fuel cell:
      assume it also weighs a pound, and that it will run for 5 hours on a charge of 30 milli-liters of methanol. If you're willing to carry 2 pounds, that's the battery plus about 250 mL of fuel--by doubling your "power" weight, you've gone to 9 times the running time....

    9. Re:Um, what's the point? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I do not know about apple, but a lot of manufacturers offer double sized or second battery bays. I would love to have the option to use a fuel cell instead of the standard Lion battery. It would be the convience of not having to plug in to recharge for long periods of time.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    10. Re:Um, what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a BayGen-radio-type crank powered laptop for gadgetry? Oh yeah!

    11. Re:Um, what's the point? by theCobolGuy · · Score: 1

      Probably the only reason for replacing batteries with a fuel cell is that fuel cells will probably be cheaper to make. Because it is 'advanced' technology, they can charge more for a fuel cell than for a battery.

      --
      Swedish Meatball
  40. Ultracapacitors? by Cutie+Pi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Why don't we here more about ultracapacitors:

    http://www.maxwell.com/ultracapacitors/ According to the above page, ultracapacitors "deliver up to 10 times the power, last up to 10 times as long, operate more reliably in high- and low-temperature conditions, require far less maintenance and reduce environmental issues associated with battery disposal" compared to batteries. I recently read about a hybrid automobile that will be using ultracaps (don't remember who). It seems like these could be implemented in laptops and cell phones.

    1. Re:Ultracapacitors? by chill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because batteries deliver the charge over a long period of time, whereas capacitors deliver it in a quick burst.

      Yes, "ultracapacitors", too. The company you linked to is trying to market their product as an adjunt to batteries -- to deliver the surge of power needed for certain operations like startup, burst writets, etc. They aren't a replacement for batteries.

      The confusion is the phrase "last up to 10 times as long" -- meaning their total lifetime is longer than the batteries, but not while delivering constant power.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Ultracapacitors? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Capacitors are great for giving a power boost (e.g. starting an electrci motor) but they don't directly replace batteries, they're a different thing altogether. For a capacitor, energy = 1/2 * C * V^2 where C is the capacitance, so as you drain the energy, the voltage V falls. For a battery you need something to keep the voltage roughly constant over the whole operating cycle.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    3. Re:Ultracapacitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nissan recently showed a hybrid truck prototype using a Gore ultracap (not Al, but the company that makes GoreTex). The system doubled the truck's fuel economy.

      In (SOVIET?) Russia, there are hybrid busses currently in service that use ultracaps in conjunction with a diesel engine.

    4. Re:Ultracapacitors? by addaon · · Score: 1

      Using ultracaps with a mini-itx board (EPIA 5000 with six PC-100E caps) to allow about two minutes away from wall. Low energy, outrageous lifetime.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    5. Re:Ultracapacitors? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right, but ultracapacitors have the unfortunate property that if you discharge them into your body, you die.

    6. Re:Ultracapacitors? by peter · · Score: 1

      You'd need a more complicated power supply to efficiently use power from an ultracap, since they really are capacitors. The voltage across the terminals is linearly proportional to the remaining charge (and thus the square root of the remaining energy). To power a fixed-voltage circuit, you'd need a flexible DC-DC converter. OTOH, I don't think it would be much of a problem to build such a supply.

      Other than that, I think you're misinterpreting the message: power is energy/time. 10 times the power means you can charge or discharge fast. The page you linked doesn't say anything about energy storage capacity, but I'd guess it's less than chemical batteries. If you get an electron of charge per molecule of whatever's in your battery, you'd be hard-pressed to match that with a capacitor, no matter how much effective surface area your carbon has. The page doesn't say anything about being good for powering electric vehicles on its own, just for handling the high-current initial acceleration and regenerative braking.

      --
      #define X(x,y) x##y
      Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  41. also... by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 1

    Not to mention that the FAA requires the pilot be notified of all hazardous materials shipped on airplanes. (I'm in charge of hazmat auditing at a UPS hub). Having these methanol cartidges would require the passenger to have to register it or something of that nature, have it inspected, and a report given to the pilot of all of the laptops of this type on the plane. If this wasn't followed by the wonderful employees in baggage...hefty, and i mean HEFTY fines could result. For example, Emery Airlines was nailed for $500,000 for not notifying pilots of hazmats onboard. So...I don't see these on planes anytime soon either.

    1. Re:also... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      The DOT has already approved small quantities of methanol for fuel cells, IIRC. You dont have to register the butane in your cigarette lighter.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:also... by sickmtbnutcase · · Score: 1

      True, there are differences with hauling passengers or a plane full of cardboard and paper. But, I'm also curious as to what would happen if you have to order these fuel cells and get them shipped through UPS. This would cost a lot to ship (since hazmat shipping is outrageous) Even if you ship something like lighters through UPS, they require hazmat papers and special packaging. So just ordering new fuel cells would be a major pain due to the extra shipping costs.

    3. Re:also... by djrogers · · Score: 1

      Hmm, maybe I'm just having a particularly lucid day, but... Why not just ship them EMPTY?

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
  42. Re:EVER SCRATCH YOUR BUNGHOLE THEN SMELL YOUR FING by override11 · · Score: 1

    Give yourself a hitler?

    --
    No I didnt spell check this post...
  43. Maybe by papasui · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Computer manufactures should focus on lower power solutions instead of building better batteries (or combine the two). My 17" Powerbook I ordered is rated at 4.5 hrs already with a standard battery. In general the pc world seems that the solution is always to throw more power at the problem instead of trying to come up with a more elegant method of dealing with it. (This isn't a rip on PC's I use both Macs and Pcs daily, just that there's more than 1 solution to most problems)

    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Supplying a large amount of power has always been a problem. We've nearly solved the effiency issues. Take a look at the various satilite systems. These have power supplies and components that approach 100% efficiency but they still need more power. Even with all the components running at 100% efficiency, they still can't do very much because there's not enough power.

      Power storage is an age old problem and we haven't made much progress. Component efficiency, while always needing improvement, has fairly well known solutions. Power storage no really good solutions. I think we need to spend MORE on developing power storage technology, not less.

    2. Re:Maybe by entrigant · · Score: 1

      So they "Build a Better Battery" and suddenly that's the only thing the ENTIRE industry is focusing on? Welcome to modern times, let me introduce you. We live in a world with billions, that's right, I said BILLIONS of people. Granted not all of them do r&d, but a hefty amount do, and I promise you that not ALL of them are focusing on this fuel cell battery. In fact, if you look hard enough, I'm sure you can find tons and tons of juicy tid bits on new technologies to do the same amount with less power, and the crazy thing is that these aren't the same people who did the r&d for this fuel cell battery!

    3. Re:Maybe by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      So why arent there damn clever people combining the two technology groups outputs, and creating low power devices with high-yield batteries?
      Oh yeah- its that damn pesky IP/Patent business....
      Small advances - Sharp does their Chip On Glass, Kodak Their Oled displays and Toshiba their fuel cell laptops, meanwhile because of IP law and business interests - the technologies are never fully combined.
      I love Open cores. I have my day job, and outside of that I will be happy to contribute what I can for free- be it code, hardware design etc...
      Why? Because I will directly benefit from someone else doing the same.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  44. Re:5 hours? by MBCook · · Score: 1

    Your transmeta would probably get 8 hours. That's 5 hours with a "normal" laptop.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  45. Battery sized? by iankerickson · · Score: 1

    Hopefully they'll be able to squeeze them down to AA size. I have some lithium AA batteries for my PDA, and the battery life is a little longer, but the big plus is that the amperage keeps up even when the batteries are low. With NiMH (or NiCD I suppose) if the battery is low and you turn on the backlight, the PDA shuts off and drops to backup battery power. Maybe with a fuel-cell battery you could actually use the PC-Card slot on the road for more than 30 minutes without draining the batteries dry.

    --
    Democracy. Whiskey. Sexy. Pick any two.
  46. Fuel Cells and Flying by Gallenod · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, since the cells contain methanol, they would probably be banned from airplanes for security reasons. So much for flying with your laptop.

    --

    TLR

    A man no more knows his destiny than a tea leaf knows the history of the East India Company
  47. Re:seriously by dbrutus · · Score: 1

    There will be an increase in risk for those people who use their laptop around large open flames. Hopefully these people will know to stick to regular batteries.

  48. Fuel? No, thanks. by Frobozz0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I really don't want a contained fire on my lap. I know Lithium-ion reactions are probably just as bad, but there's just a big mental difference. Do you really want something that can run your lawnmover on an airplane? Does the airline want it on your lap, either?

    --
    "Politicians find new names for institutions which under old names have become odious to the people."
    1. Re:Fuel? No, thanks. by juhaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's alcohol, not dynamite.

      Having this thing on your lap is no bigger deal than carrying one of those miniature bottles of booze. Horrified about danger of explosion when holding one of those? No? Thought so.

      And yes, you could run your lawnmower on ethanol just as well as on methanol.

      Airline certainly doesn't seem to have anything against selling you ethanol for your lap on flight themselves, either.

    2. Re:Fuel? No, thanks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why not? you already have a "contained fire" inside your lap.

      The overall reaction for carbohydrate metabolism is exactly the same as combusion, only it is carried out slowly with enzymes. Just like fuel cells versus combustion, one is carried out slowly in a controlled manner, the other one is a large explosion.

    3. Re:Fuel? No, thanks. by horza · · Score: 1

      ROTFL

      I really don't want a contained fire on my lap. I know Lithium-ion reactions are probably just as bad, but there's just a big mental difference. Do you really want something that can run your lawnmover on an airplane? Does the airline want it on your lap, either?

      You don't want a contained fire on your lap, but you're willing to get on an aeroplane??? What on earth do you think a plane is these days?

      Phillip.

    4. Re:Fuel? No, thanks. by SailorFrag · · Score: 1

      Fuel cells aren't controlled fire. They work by stripping the hydrogen atom of its electron, sending the electron through a wire, than having it join up with another hydrogen that has done the same thing + an oxygen from the air.

      Fire, which is combustion, works much differently. The reaction going on in fuel cells won't run your lawnmower, unless you're talking about an electric one... in which case, you've got electricity on your lap already when using a battery.

  49. The InfoWorld Link says to Market in 2004 by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Inforworld link (that I was submitting at the same time that this story got posted, BTW), says they will be available in 2004.

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  50. Re:Ultracapacitors? nope-- you missed something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ultracapacitors are not an alternative portable energy source-- check out specs before speaking. Wh/kg is 1/10 that of batteries-- they hold much less energy.

  51. Java and Power the future is bright by davonshire · · Score: 1

    Ok, here's the ultimate use for Fuel Cell units like this. Install a espresso maker in the laptop. The fuel cell provides both water and heat. And Presto it fuels the laptop and the user.

    Today is what tomorrow will be built from.

  52. remember that its for using, it by digitalsushi · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just remember that these battery packs are for fueling your computer, not for drinking them like alcohol and then getting drunk with them...

    guess that's why they say "never drink your laptop battery!" ba dum bum!

    speaking of drinking laptop batteries as a substitute for alcohol, could I get another? ooh.. where do I come up with this stuff, I'm funnier than ALF

    --
    slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
  53. Exactly... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And, you can use any power outlet anywhere for free (except at home of course) whereas the fuel always costs extra - if you can find it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  54. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  55. wet pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The trick is that they use the water by-product


    Use the laptop on your lap and you will get wet pants.

    1. Re:wet pants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeh, that would really make your day...

      Wet your pants and fry your penis .

  56. Re:seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Events like this would be more dangerous!

  57. If The Fuel Cell Would Use Ethyl Alcohol by DoctorMabuse · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would be more suitable for most of the executives I work with. They could top it off from the mini-bar.

  58. Lithium by philip_bailey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "safety card" for lithium.

    It's doesn't seem to me that methanol in a sealed cell is any more dangerous than the lithium you have in your current laptop battery, or for that matter than the ethanol in the spirits sold as "Duty Free" on international flights.

    --
    There is no place like ~!
  59. new excuse for not doing homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my dad drank my fuel.

  60. Ditto machines...Mmmmm Methanol..... by poopie · · Score: 1

    Egads! I remember turning the crank on the ditto machine to make the magical blue copies in school.

    We had our ditto machine in a not so well ventilated room, and you could almost get a contact high.

    I had a hard time reading your link to the hazard.com site due to my impaired vision and persistant headaches.

    Smelly Purple Faxes

  61. The Water Byproduct.... by Fapestniegd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just needs to be re-routed to the single cup USB enabled coffee maker.

  62. virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    now you will really be able to write explode virus.

  63. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DMCA will prevent you from using non-Toshiba brand fuel cells in your laptop. Also, DMCA will prevent usage of non-Toshiba brand fuel. Any attempt to modify using mod-chip is illegal.

  64. Dammit, I hate to post this, BUT by gosand · · Score: 1
    If you want a fuel cell to be practically usable, you should make it run on 40% Ethanol, 60% water. That way, there is a commonly available fuel (Vodka) which can be easily purchased most everywhere in the US (outside Mormonstan at least).

    Mod me down, but I have to say it...

    In Soviet Russia, laptop fuels you.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:Dammit, I hate to post this, BUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst. Joke. Ever.

  65. Re:EVER SCRATCH YOUR BUNGHOLE THEN SMELL YOUR FING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a matter of fact, yes. Smelled quite nice.

  66. Re:EVER SCRATCH YOUR BUNGHOLE THEN SMELL YOUR FING by Cached+Hit · · Score: 0

    that was worth a nice rofl. mod up or be goatse'd

    --
    "look ma! no hands!!!" - random amputee
  67. widescreen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and whats this with a lot of new laptop models having widescreen lcd's ? i just want a normal screen and no widescreen junk...

  68. Tired of the Airline Regulations argument by nonoriginal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, what makes carrying a small AA battery-sized container of methanol any different than carrying a butane lighter onto an airplane? I don't see one. Not to mention all the other flammable products carried in small quantities on airplanes in cosmetics and toiletries.

    As for the waste/disposal issue, the reason fuel cells are considered advantageous is that both production and disposal is cleaner, not containing toxic chemical compounds. The cartridges could easily be recycled into new cartridges...maybe even someday like inkjet printer cartridges.

    As for the runtime on a single charge, that is certain to improve over time. The point is that they get new technology in the marketplace.

    1. Re:Tired of the Airline Regulations argument by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      ..so i should add "fuel cell refill" to my spam-filter already you think ?

    2. Re:Tired of the Airline Regulations argument by flend · · Score: 1

      disposal is cleaner, not containing toxic chemical compounds

      Actually, methanol is considered toxic. However, carrying around compressed hydrogen for an H2 fuel cell is probably not much better :)

    3. Re:Tired of the Airline Regulations argument by nonoriginal · · Score: 1

      Methanol -is- toxic. But when you dispose of the the methanol cartridge, you're not disposing of the methanol except in trace amounts. The real issue with toxic chemicals and batteries is that the toxic chemical compounds are disposed of -with- the battery, because they -are- the battery. As you use the methanol it is chemically converted to relatively safe byproducts, and is then not a disposal issue.

      Gasoline is toxic too, but when you dispose of a car, I'm guessing you don't do it while the car's got a full tank of gas.

      What I would really like to see is more research (and government encouragement) in ways to compress hydrogen without using pressure, such as carbon nanotubes. The tubes work like a sponge in a way, they attract hydrogen molecules to increase the density of the hydrogen in a given space. Releasing the hydrogen is a simple matter of applying heat, which can be obtained by recycling the heat released by the fuel cell.

      Unfortunate, government encouragement for research in the private sector is lacking, because they would prefer to consider the military applications first, and thus hinder commercial development for use by the public.

  69. +1 Interesting... by pythorlh · · Score: 1
    Makes me think... Get rid of all the extra "security" on flights, and just prepend this statement to the safety lecture:

    "Ladies and gentlemen, you are hereby, for the length of this flight, deputized to engage in the use of lethal force in defense of this airplane, and it's passengers. If you are called to exercise this right, and suceed in preventing a hijacking and/or crash, you or your surviving dependents will be eligible for a reward, possibly up to one million dollars."

    --
    Do not confuse duty with what other people expect of you; they are utterly different.Duty is a debt you owe to yourself.
    1. Re:+1 Interesting... by ffsnjb · · Score: 1

      If only I could give you every mod point in the world...

      This is EXACTLY the kind of thinking that people in this world should be pursuing. People need to stop with the "think of the children" bullshit and learn to defend themselves, and those they care about, instead of relying on something else (that can't possibly do the task, like the government) to defend them.

      Back on topic, I want fuel cells too. Now! :)

      --
      "Why do you consent to live in ignorance and fear?" - Bad Religion
    2. Re:+1 Interesting... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Good god - If I only had mod points now... I would give them by the bag...
      This is possibly one of the best things I have heard said in slashdot in a long time.
      However, one drawback is that it might kill the holywood tradition of bystander apathy while the hero does everything. I mean, if the whole cabin rushes the terrorists, and most likely takes them down, then no one person can be hero.
      I think I would certainly be ready to rush a hijacker. At least trip the bugger and stop his head with the lapto... Oops sorry - got a bit violent there... Hehe..

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  70. - Reading with comprehension. . . by soundbyt · · Score: 1

    I believe the article was saying that the Intel funded fuel cell (Not the Toshiba product) would take 2-3 years to get to market.

    "If it gets product out by then, Toshiba will probably be first to market. An Intel-funded start up, PolyFuel is working on direct methanol fuel cells for laptops. This delivers 150 watt hours hour battery capacity, three times greater than the best mobile PC batteries a day, but commercial product will take two-to-three years to get to market."

  71. Fuel Cells Already Approved for Airplanes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the US DOT has already approved one company's fuel cell for use on airplanes. It was mentioned on Slashdot here

  72. No worries by boredman · · Score: 1

    I don't think fires or security will be a major concern. According to the article:

    The technology uses water produced by the fuel cell to dilute the methanol to the 3-6 per cent concentration required for the electricity generating reaction. The upshot: the methanol can be stored at a much higher concentration, requiring a much smaller (ten per cent) fuel tank.

    The wording is a bit confusing, so I'm not sure if the fuel tanks are 10% smaller, or that the concentration of methanol in the fuel tanks is 10%.

    Either way, it's pretty clear that the fuel cell reaction only takes place with very low concentrations of methanol, and my guess is the fuel is going to be a comparitvely dilute mixture of methanol and water.

  73. Too expensive, use H-1Bs!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let the slaves build them !!!!!

  74. Why I can't wait for small fuel cells... by cr0sh · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I am currently in the process of building a recumbent electric vehicle from bicycle frames (I basically have everything done, still need to get the foot rests in place, and the drive system in) - I have designed it to use four 12V gel-cell batteries (ie, the 7AH powercell kind), or possibly even glassmat if I can get them cheap enough. However, the things are heavy. I would love to have a fuel cell that I could easily "fill up" with common fuels (gasoline, methanol, ethenol, butane, propane - I don't care).

    BTW, before anyone questions "why don't I use a go-ped like engine" - noise is the main reason, laws are another (as in legal grey area).

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Why I can't wait for small fuel cells... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Dude- do you have a website? Photos? Would you share your design?
      This sounds like it rules.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    2. Re:Why I can't wait for small fuel cells... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      I am taking photos as I build it. The completed project, along with all photos and commentary, will go up on my website when I am finished.

      I currently have the main frame finished (ie, cut and welded - still needs painting, but asthetics will be left for last), with the motor mount plate and the seat attached to it.

      I am currently working on the steering column extension (had to cut/reweld to lengthen the bit to raise the handlebar piece, but I still need to come up with a longer wedge bolt to hold it in place). I also need to build the foot rests up front (probably going to be a short length of steel tubing with the pedals welded on at the ends, with the tubing welded in a "T" config to another piece of tubing that will slide and be adjustable to leg length). There is also the decision about where to put the batteries - I have given thoughts to a rack above the rear wheel, or in a pannier-style case configuration, or possibly below the keel tube. I like the last two options, though they would be more difficult to construct, because they ensure a low CoG, whereas the first is easier to build, but give a higher CoG, and could be more dangerous in the event of an accident, because they would be behind my head.

      The vehicle is a "short wheelbase, above seat steering recumbent" design, which is the simplest to design and build (I wanted under-seat steering, but designing that and getting it to work safely is a bitch). It is made from two bikes which I took apart and welded back together - a 20" girls BMX bike, and a 26" womens 10-speed road bike. I bought both at yard sales, for $15.00 total. My motor was also cheap (IIRC, $25.00 or so). Extra steel was scrap.

      I have the motor, which is a nice 90VDC continuous-duty ball bearing motor, has a lot of torque for its size. It needs new bearings, though, which I will probably install or have installed after I get into the final build stages. It will be mounted on the motor mount using two large hose clamps. I didn't want to weld it on, because if I needed to service the motor or replace it, it is hard to break a weld. Plus welding could damage the motor (ruin the magnets, or warp the casing). Any other form of mounting, such a using the screw holes on the motor's c-face, require precise machining of mountings, for which I don't have the tools. The clamps will work good, are fairly standard, and strong.

      The motor will drive the rear wheel via the chain to the back wheel. The rear of the vehicle is a 26" 10-speed bike, so I will have a derailleur. If there is enough torque to move my butt and keep it going, then I will have 5 forward speeds. If not, then I will have to weld one of the larger front sprockets in place on the back to reduce the gear ratio front-to-back, and have only one gear (though I could then use a speed controller with the batteries for different speed settings). I am trying to initially avoid a speed controller, due to cost reasons (so far, I am under $100.00 in this thing).

      The sprocket for the motor is actually an ANSI #40 9-tooth chain sprocket, milled down for bicycle chain by a local machine shop (ANSI #40 chain has the same pitch as bike chain, 1/2 inch, but is wider, hence the sprocket was wider for the industrial use, and needed milling). Actually, that sprocket is the most crucial piece to find if you are going to be building any kind of motor or engine powered small vehicle - I had to do a bunch of research to find what I needed, and to speak the talk to a local supplier of sprockets. Once I found my part (I think it cost $10.00), he recommended a close-by machine shop, which amazingly (through the charm of my brother-in-law) did the work for free (even if they hadn't, the time for the milling would have only cost me $60.00 max).

      This has been a very fun project to work on. It has mainly been a way for me to practice and get better at my welding, while building something both practical and alternative. When I am done, I might submit it as an article for /. (not sure if I want to be /.'d or not). At any rate, it has been something way different from coding on my *nix box, most certainly.

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    3. Re:Why I can't wait for small fuel cells... by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      Well I certainly like your VR artical - and will be waiting patiently for your vehical. I wander if you can get the papers to drive it on the roads?

      Anyone ever seen the book which shows you how to build your own car and race it- where you build a car sneakily named the "Lo-Cost" (a parody of lotus methinks)?

      I do not want to buy or invest in a petrol engine car- too big, too expensive, too much proprietory junk, and I really dont want to contribute a incontinent mans feacal matter to the oil industry.

      Until then I will stick with public transport and a bicycle - though note to visiters of London - before you lock your bike to anything - pull it - make sure it does not easily give or move, those theives will take a whole fence just to get the bike here. My worst record is having a bike nicked in under 24 hours.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    4. Re:Why I can't wait for small fuel cells... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
      I wander if you can get the papers to drive it on the roads?

      This is where things get funky, at least over here in the States. Most (not all, I think) states in the the US have certain license restrictions, and vehicle restrictions. These states won't give you a license for a vehicle if the engine is under a certain minimum combustion chamber volume (typically measured in CC's, sometimes CI's). It varies from typically 100-250 CCs. Anything above this restriction can be licensed for road use. The first class of vehicles, which are typically two-wheeled, are classified under the designation of "moped" or sometimes "scooter". The next class are motorcycles, then automobiles, then typically commercial vehicles (these larger vehicles - automobiles and commercial, are typically measured and classed by gross tonnage, I think).

      Anyhow, anything less than a moped cannot typically be licensed for road use - even if they can keep up with traffic flow! Such vehicles are things like gopeds and motorized bicycles (which typically have engines under 100 CCs, or even electric). To make matters worse, the laws also typically state that motorized (sometimes they say engine powered - big difference) vehicles cannot be operated on sidewalks (small thing that helped to kill the Segway, besides cost). Finally, some municipalities require that human-powered bicycles be licensed to operate them.

      What a tangled web is woven! All of this introduces a "grey area" of law, especially when you have an electric vehicle (which isn't engine powered, and has *no* CCs) concerned. I would hate to think what would happen if the vehicle was an electric-assist one (which I was thinking about playing with on mine)!

      Basically, I am just going to build the thing, and make it seem as much like a recumbent bicycle as I can, and just play with it. If it seems like something I can "take out on the road", so to speak - I will probably look into seeing what can be done legally to license it (hey, and maybe I can get a tax break for alternate-energy usage to boot!)...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  75. Re:seriously by juhaz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very safe.

    People aren't yelling about how scary and flammable vodka, or any other strong ethanol containing liquid is, but for some reason when they hear the word "methanol" associated with fuel cells it only takes nanoseconds before someone is screaming about safety...

    If you live somewhere with cold weather you've probably used diluted methanol in your windshield washer for godssake! Did it explode then?

  76. You lovable Germans, can I shit on your Nazi flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  77. General use fuel cells by calm_a_whore · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know the practicallities of replacing normal lead acid batteries charged by a generator (on a boat) with methanol fuel cells. The batteries are used for domestic power and charged by generator/engine/wind/solar (in that order) on a sail boat. If I could use silent efficient fuel calls instead (prolly keap one lead acid for engine starting curent and store the solar/wind that I have anyway) and save the wieght space of the genny I would be a happy hamster. Thanks for help :) one Calm Whore

  78. In principle, yes by Goonie · · Score: 1
    That's exactly what a fuel cell does. You keep on topping up the tank, it keeps on producing power indefinitely. IIRC, you have to flush the fuel cell every so often to get rid of the contaminants that build up, but you can do that with the fuel itself, so that's no great drama.

    However, this particular fuel cell system is probably designed for safety and ease of refilling, and would have a battery or ultracapacitor backup, so the cartridges are probably not refillable on the fly - you have to stop the system, swap the fuel cartridge, and start it up again.

    In the future, though, it's not hard to see people taking fuel-cell "generators" on camping trips.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  79. Storage by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    The problem with hydrogen is storage. Liquid, gas tight pressure canisters? Methanol is a simple and effective solution to that problem.

    You can manufacture methanol from a number of sources, fossil fuels, biological sources, you can even manufacture it from the CO2 in the atmosphere if you have plenty of free energy.

    --
    Deleted
  80. BSOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Blue Schnapps Over Drambuie?

  81. You Pansy. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    I ride a motorcycle.

    Several thousand explosions per minute 6 inches from my bollocks. Add to that a 50kW heater situated directly under 20L of petrol, which happens to be placed 1 inch from my bollocks.

    --
    Deleted
  82. DIY Version? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So is there a way i can make one of these fuel cells myself?

    Yes, ive done a google, but only found books that 'claim' to show you.. but of course, no refunds if the info is garbage.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  83. So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple has had 5 hour battery life for notebooks for years.

  84. new drinking song by cavehobbit · · Score: 1

    100 bateries for my dell on the wall, 100 batteries for my dell take one down, surf it around, 99 batteries for my dell on the wall.. . . . . . yada

  85. 5 hours? by anethema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I sure hope that improves. Thats barely better than my current celeron 633 laptop. If better at all. Certainly not at idle.

    I dont relish paying a lot of money for a battery that doesnt last any longer than my current one.

    Well, then again filling it is a lot quicker than charging a battery.
    Ignore me i guess, i must be in a bitching mood. :|

    --


    It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
  86. this could be dangerous... by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    to the Oil Industry.

    Laptops and cell phones have already driven batteries to the point where they are useful in cars...

    Just think about what the oil industry would do if you could run your electric car on locally made methanol (or ethanol)....

    If they're smart, they'll keep this out of the market for as long as possible (watch for exploding fuel-cell laptop horror stories)

  87. Different strokes by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1
    > The size of a desktop gives to the flexibility to use standard components.

    But some laptop components are either bog-standard now or come in one of a few formats. Here are the ones that are standard:
    1. Hard drives (2.5 inch disk)
    2. CD-ROM/DVD/floppy drives (IIRC these come in either of two form factors)
    3. Add-on RAM (SO-DIMM)
    4. Add-on RAM (SO-DIMM).
    5. CPUs - not in all cases.
    6. LCD panels - they need drivers though


    The components still specialized are:
    1. the "motherboard" - This is a biggie because it has *a lot* of integrated stuff onboard (graphics/ports... sometimes even CPUs). Many "backend" manufacturers (eg: Compal) sell bare-bones laptop chassis However, trying to procure a few is like pulling teeth from a croc - the manufacturers only seem to want to sell in units of hundreds. Hey, how about a bulk Slashdot "Group Purchase" of barebone laptop kits?
    2. the keyboard/touchpad
    3. motherboard power interface - these keyboard/touchpad
    4. LCD driver - LVDS output needed from motherboard
    5. Power and battery interface - standardized in some cases.


    > I would rather have smaller laptops than standardised ones.
    That's you - but its different strokes for different folks really. Many (most?) people would prefer an open-er laptop specification that could be customized by the system integrator or the end-user. (This is already happening with some system integrators by the way - they purchase laptop barebones kits and build laptops to order)
    This would also drive prices down. Of course, the apple's of the laptop world would still have a market share :) But competition would , um, *help* them improve at a faster clip too.

  88. Pot... kettle... black... by horza · · Score: 1

    Also, it states at the end of the article it will take 2-3 years to get to market. It's amazing that the poster of this story can't even read the article

    "Toshiba will unveil a prototype DMFC at CeBit next week, but commercialisation of the technology is unlikely to take place until next year"

    It says the Intel funded version won't be out 2-3 years.

    Sigh. Who can't read the article?

    Phillip.

  89. IBM's problems solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many users of IBM Thinkpads will know how their Li-Ion batteries get fried after about a month of use.

    They contain monitoring hardware not designed to allow for a laptops unique power needs. This results in the monitors not discharging the Li-ion cells properly, reducing the lifetime of the cells and confusing the thinkpad into thinking the batt is dead when there may be a good 45 mins left!

    Buy a new batt for a horrendous price (£45 upwards) and after about a month, it happens again.

    All this has created a market for a third party batt, that is actually designed to work with laptops, is cheaper than IBM's "bricks", and can last a reasonable time!

    If toshiba start shipping these fuel cells with the form factor(s) of IBM's glorified 1 month bricks then they can be garenteed almost all IBM thinkpad users will buy them!

    This also raises the question as to wether IBM have patents on the bricks or if they will use the DMCA to stop toshiba making replacements. Many users probably buy new IBM batts frequently (i don't bother) and because of the 1 month life, this generates quite a revenue for IBM which toshiba could take away.

    These issues with batts are not just limited to IBM. Many laptop batt manufactures make the same mistake of using general purpose materials inside laptop batts causing similar problems. IBM however have not admitted to the problem, put it down to overcharging and tell you to order a new one!

    Besides, the fuel cells last longer. :-)

  90. What are you on? by horza · · Score: 1

    Sure it takes me a couple of hours to fully recharge, but that's what a second battery is for, should I need one.

    And how heavy is this 2nd battery? And if your battery dies then I suppose you can buy a second one easily enough at the newagents at the airport?

    Also, I don't have to refill, nor throw away spent fuel cells. It sounds like manually refueling would be a pain in the arse [for a laptop].

    Eh? It will be just like changing batteries in a walkman. Doesn't sound any great hardship to me.

    Vehicles using fuel cells sound much more interesting

    Do you know how many toxic batteries are disposed of each year? Even rechargable ones have a limited lifespan. I don't think this is any less important than car fuel cells, even if it's less glamerous.

    What would be interesting would be a fuel cell laptop that got maybe 24 hours on a "charge".

    Fuel cells are ultra-efficient but you can only get out the amount of energy stored in the fuel source. If you want it to last longer, either use a larger refill pack, or cut down the energy usage of the device.

    This just seems like gadgetry for its own sake

    You're not that guy that's still kicking himself for turning down The Beatles, are you?

    Phillip.

  91. Re:oh well by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

    Ummm- Arent regular batteries MUCH more dangerous exposed to naked flames than methanol. Methanol burns, and gives of relatively harmless substances. L/Ion, NI-Cad, and non-rechargable Batteries tend to explode, revealing some fairly nasty corrosive substances and toxic fumes.

    --
    OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
  92. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    Every program has at least one bug and can be shortened by at least one
    instruction -- from which, by induction, one can deduce that every
    program can be reduced to one instruction which doesn't work.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...