Slashdot Mirror


Rebuilding Iraq's Internet

Anselm writes "According to this article at Wired.com, "The war has left Iraq's Internet infrastructure in shambles. Now, a British ISP hopes to fund the reconstruction through sales of domain names ending in .iq." While I have no use for an IQ domain, the article does make me wonder: Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?"

284 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Why don't we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Try and feed them first.

    1. Re:Why don't we... by missing000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Here's an idea:
      How about we give them food, PC's, cars, etc. in exchange for oil.
      This could be facilitated through an intermediate form of exchange we could call "money".

    2. Re:Why don't we... by broter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We already tried that. It resulted in an attempted invasion of Kuwait, and the eventual (supposed) death of their president/dictator.

      Hmmmm.... Yes, I see the bug right here. If we just pass in the food PCs and cars with out the associated weapons, dual purpose items, and CIA intel, then it should run much better.

      Kinda like upgrading your server from Windows 3.1 to Windows NT 1.0 SP1

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
    3. Re:Why don't we... by Cloud+9 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Let me give you a scenario. Your village has been bombed, your house is destroyed, you've lost 2 sons and a leg from the war, and your fields have been razed.

      Which would you rather have RIGHT NOW, food or kazaa?

      I don't argue that rebuilding their communications infrastructure is a fantastic idea, LATER. Right now, it's probably more important that people don't starve waiting for it.

      --
      Karma: Dyn-o-mite!(mostly affected by Jimmy Walker reading your comments)
    4. Re:Why don't we... by broter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which would you rather have RIGHT NOW, food or kazaa?

      Ummm...That wasn't my point.

      1) I was joking.

      2) The people who can rebuild the communication infrastructure probably have not experience in food and water distribution (a nont trivial problem).

      3) Neither are going on now dispite the need for both, so your point is moot.

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
    5. Re:Why don't we... by Beatbyte · · Score: 2, Funny

      so you're saying we have roughly 3.5 million dead iraqi's, and the rest only have 1 leg?

    6. Re:Why don't we... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Let me give you a scenerio. Your sons have been murdered, you have been tortured and you're missing a leg for speaking against your dictator, your wive's life has been threatened, your country's food, medicine, economy and everything else has been ransacked and obliterated by a violent dictator. You have no freedom. You have no savings. You have no future. You're forced to vote for someone under penalty of death. You're a hostage in your own country.

      Which would you rather have right now. That under Hussein? Or a shot at freedom and self-rule with a little assistance from America, Australia, Spain and Britain?

      As far as the internet infrastructure... I think that's a little premature. That's like kicking the mob-rule out of Afghanistan and then debating what fashion designers to bring in to help the women with their new look (ie, they don't need it - they still wear burkas).

    7. Re:Why don't we... by gauche · · Score: 1

      Get over yourself. The previous poster was in no way insinuating that every single Iraqi is in the condition described. Many Iraqis have, no doubt, survived the past month with their families and persons largely unscathed. Some of them may even be financially well-off.
      But those aren't the people who need the help.

    8. Re:Why don't we... by pkunzipper · · Score: 1

      Oops. Look I think you're forgetting how important communications infrastructure wll be in flooding their country with western ideas. Sure they're happy they got rid of a dictator, but they are used to a way of life none of us can relate to, and will provbably start to move in "the wrong direction" unless we can quickly influence them. btw. That article on the post beneth or above meine from arabnews.com about America controoling the world is bs. Think broad man, that is a very temporary situation.

    9. Re:Why don't we... by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As far as the internet infrastructure... I think that's a little premature. That's like kicking the mob-rule out of Afghanistan and then debating what fashion designers to bring in to help the women with their new look

      Even the Afghani's have stopped hoping for U.S. assistance in rebuilding. Read the entire article and tell me how many references to the U.S. reconstruction efforts there are. Not like the promises weren't made. It may be different in Iraq though. They have oil.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    10. Re:Why don't we... by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let me give you a scenario:

      You wake up in hospital with no arms, your entire family is dead and the guys who did it are playing Pinochle at an air base in Britain.

      You think you might be a wee bit pissed off?

      Or a shot at freedom and self-rule with a little assistance from America, Australia, Spain and Britain?

      Why would you care. You have no arms and everyone you loved is dead. I guess you could thank your lucky stars that they didn't use a GBU-31 to do it. Then you'd just be pink mist. Or maybe that would have been a blessing.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    11. Re:Why don't we... by broter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But those aren't the people who need the help.

      I disagree. From what I've heard (not much different from what many others have), every Iraqi will need aid. The restructuring of the government will likely disrupt much of the basic services that are required to live. In the short term, water and food delivery, medical supplies (that were taxed before hostilities broke out), and electricity. In the long term, local food production, a reliable law enforcement and judiciary, and (yes) a communication system.

      But it's rather silly to ignore work on the long term necessities while securing the short term goals. Many of the short term goals need the long term goals to work. Without law enforcement, distribution to the needy of food and water is difficult. And, yes, a communication infrastructure (not what the article is talking about at all) to coordinate local departments is essential.

      Some of these can be bandaided by the USUK forces in the region, but movement to a permanent system in important.

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
    12. Re:Why don't we... by broter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ...but they are used to a way of life none of us can relate to, and will provbably start to move in "the wrong direction" unless we can quickly influence them.

      Indeed, some of the open questions are: If the Iraqi people do get a true democracy, will it be pro-US? If not, will America stand for it, or will we declare it illigitimate?

      That article on the post beneth or above meine from arabnews.com about America controoling the world is bs.

      I agree that it's lame, but what does that arab world think about it? An important factor in this action was the middle east's reaction to a new Iraqi state. Will they see it as an opportunity, or as a slight? Right now, much of the arab press seems to see it as an insult and a humiliating defeat for arabs. Will this view win out, or will we be exhonorated in time?

      It's too early to tell from where I'm sitting. But rumour has it that recruits to terrorist camps is up.

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
    13. Re:Why don't we... by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

      You act like those attrocities never happened.

      No, I don't. I just refuse to justify evil actions with feel good rationalizations.

      There is a difference between objecting to war as the solution to the worlds ills and agreeing or supporting the enemy. Just like their is a difference between nationalism and patriotism. If you cannot see that difference, I cannot help you.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    14. Re:Why don't we... by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      wait.

      who said iraq wants a democracy? did anybody ask them if that's what they want? I'm just wondering.. did anybody ask them? how? who? who are we to decide what their government should be like?

      not ranting, I just can't find answers to this.

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    15. Re:Why don't we... by daviddennis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, we really don't know what they want. Democracy enables us to ask them.

      Democracy is a way to enable them to select what they want through their evaluation of competing proposals. It is theoretically compatible with anything from libertarian capitalism to an Islamist freakshow or the worst forms of ossified socialism.

      I suspect they will choose capitalism, since Islamism has been tried unsuccessfully in both Afghanistan and Iran, both times with very poor results, and ossified socialism is remarkably similar to what the Baath party advocates. But that's not saying that we will force them to make that decision; they will make up their own minds.

      And that's the beauty of Democracy. We aren't imposing anything on them; we are giving them the tools to select what pleases them.

      D

    16. Re:Why don't we... by facelessnumber · · Score: 1

      who said iraq wants a democracy? did anybody ask them if that's what they want? I'm just wondering.. did anybody ask them? how? who? who are we to decide what their government should be like?

      You have a very good point there. How is anyone to know whether or not they want a democratic government? Oh, wait! I have an idea! Let's have them VOTE on it!

    17. Re:Why don't we... by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      I recently read "Apres l'Empire" by Emmanuel Todd. In French, armed with a dictionary. Slowly. Chances are the book I read isn't what he wrote. I bought it and read it because I wanted to get a feel for what the French are really thinking (the book is on the best seller list in the hypermarket) when I'm being told they're cheese eating surrender monkeys (an example of democracy in practice I don't think).

      He made the point that societies in transition, he gave Iran as an example, adopt political systems that look strange from a Western viewpoint, but are shaped by anthropological factors like family structures, and eventually sort themselves out. It just doesn't happen overnight, or how we might want it to.

      So, you can't just expect democracy to work if, for example, the tribal elders get together, decide what the party line is, and dictate what everyone else should vote, in societies where folks are conditioned to do what they're told not just by dictators but by custom and family ties. I'm not saying this represents Iraq, just that it is naive to expect that democracy is just about giving people the tools.

      Which, in a roundabout way, comes to Todd's point, and the point of this article. He says that two things combine to make society change for the better, falling birthrates and better education, which re-inforce each other. Democracy will wither away without education, education encourages democracy, and also helps prevents abuses of same.

    18. Re:Why don't we... by Dylan+Zimmerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, if Iraq is anything like the Democratic Republic of Congo, then we'll have their democraticaly elected leader assasinated and we will put someone we like in charge by rigging the next election. Then he'll screw things up worse than Sadam ever could. He'll sell all of Iraq's oil to pay for his personal army of mercenaries. He will use all of the foreign aid money we give him to fund that same army. Eventually, his own people will rise up in revolt and kill him.

    19. Re:Why don't we... by spun · · Score: 1

      Let us not forget cleaning up the hundreds of thousands of depleted uranium penetrator darts we have fired into Bahgdad and other major Iraqi cities. And the medical bills for all the cancer caused by inhaling aerosolized uranium. And all the mutant children.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    20. Re:Why don't we... by mr100percent · · Score: 1
      Not as bad as I think?

      Look at the Birth defects in Basra from the last time we used depleted Uranium.

      It sickens me that the US and UN didn't outlaw the stuff.

  2. Come one by Joshuah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Boo freakady who. Iraq has so many other problems right now. Why dont geeks send MONEY, FOOD to local companies like CARE that help the people of Iraq. By providing food, 100% of the people can use it. how many iraq's have a computer much less have ever been online? Yeah, in a year or two from now, when people are feed and they are dying for disesases, then worry abou rebuilding the internet systems...

    1. Re:Come one by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Boo freakady who. Iraq has so many other problems right now. Why dont geeks send MONEY, FOOD to local companies like CARE that help the people of Iraq. By providing food, 100% of the people can use it. how many iraq's have a computer much less have ever been online? Yeah, in a year or two from now, when people are feed and they are dying for disesases, then worry abou rebuilding the internet systems...

      I'm sorry, but an ISP is not geared towards providing humanitarian aid. They are geared towards providing internet access. Is it a priority? Not really. Is it something for them to expand their market capital? Yup. Is it still a good thing? Yup.

      They are a business, that is doing business things, in a business world, to enhance their business. This is like getting upset that Microsoft is not going to send all of their resources and money for food and aid.

      Businesses make money. That's what they do. In fact, it's almost the very definition of "business." All the threads saying that it's not a priority, you are right. This isn't about a priority. This is about a business venture.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    2. Re:Come one by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      how many iraq's have a computer

      Well, from the pictures of the looting, a lot more than a couple days ago.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Come one by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      Let's see... Juse send them food, and forget about rebuilding their economy. That way, they will be completely dependent on the USA and UK for assistance without any hope of becoming an independent nation again. It worked so well for all those countries in Africa, let's do it in Iraq.

    4. Re:Come one by juuri · · Score: 1

      Uh du0d this is a site for geeks and nerds. What do we do? We fuck around with computers and technology.

      Obviously some of us want to help rebuild Iraq and why not do that in the way we are best suited, by aiding with improving the tech infrastructure.

      Would you suggest slashdot readers talk about farming?

      --
      --- I do not moderate.
    5. Re:Come one by wandernotlost · · Score: 1
      Businesses make money. That's what they do. In fact, it's almost the very definition of "business." All the threads saying that it's not a priority, you are right. This isn't about a priority. This is about a business venture.

      Well, it's just a business venture from the ISP's perspective. They're proposing to use Iraq's national assets to fund it, though, which is at least cause for some concern. If I was an Iraqi, I might be kind of pissed a few years down the road, when my country was gaining some stability again, to hear that a foreign company sold off all the lucrative names in my country's domain in order to fund its own contract, during the time in which its country's military was running my government.

      Whether or not it's a priority certainly comes into play when you're talking about a foreign occupying force deciding to dole out a country's assets and resources to fund business ventures in which the profit is reaped by companies in the occupying countries.

    6. Re:Come one by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      If I was an Iraqi, I might be kind of pissed a few years down the road, when my country was gaining some stability again, to hear that a foreign company sold off all the lucrative names in my country's domain in order to fund its own contract, during the time in which its country's military was running my government.

      Go read the Citri release, they explicitely address this point.

      Whether or not it's a priority certainly comes into play when you're talking about a foreign occupying force deciding to dole out a country's assets and resources to fund business ventures in which the profit is reaped by companies in the occupying countries.

      Well, they could go ahead and try to do it themselves. You know.. with all their infastructure in place. They have to build it with something. Wouldn't you rather have decent internet access in 2 years, instead of still building the resources to build it?

      Citri is a non-profit organization, backed by the ISPs that are going to actually provide the net access to start with. After Iraq gets self-sufficient, they are going to hand the reigns over to Iraq. If Iraq wants the .iq domain for only Iraqi citizens, they just wait for the expiration time on the domains and refuse to renew unless your Iraqi.

      Easy enough solution, and by the time Iraq becomes self-sufficient, most of the domains will be up for expiration.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    7. Re:Come one by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

      >Yeah, in a year or two from now, when people are feed and they are dying for disesases

      Now, now, there's no need to be that gloomy.

    8. Re:Come one by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      By providing food, 100% of the people can use it. how many iraq's have a computer much less have ever been online?

      Probably a couple of dozen people in Saddam City have brand new computers right now courtesy of the U.N.

    9. Re:Come one by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      the EULA doesn't allow for a license to be transferred that way

      Hmm - does anybody really think that the Iraqi government would pass a license audit? I'm sure they weren't worried about getting sued.

      Then again, maybe those conspiracy buffs shouldn't be looking only at oil for a reason the US sent in the Marines...

    10. Re:Come one by Phartx2 · · Score: 1

      how many iraq's have a computer

      Given that there is one Iraq, at least of any fame, and that there is most certainly at least one computer in Iraq, then to answer your question : One. One Iraq has a computer.

      I'm like the Owl on Tootsie-Roll Pop commericals!

    11. Re:Come one by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Well, when you think about this, it's really a very bad thing.

      Where do you think the records are of who the secret police are? Who the torturers are? Where the mass graves are? Where the nerve gas cannisters are buried, and where the foreign bank accounts are? Police states document stuff like that meticulously.

      They need to put a bounty on those PCs, ASAP.

    12. Re:Come one by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Read those Microsoft EULAs carefully. Many of them have a clause that "prevents" rogue states with WMDs from installing. (Seriously.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    13. Re:Come one by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      If you listen to some of the happy crowd during the looting, the happiest are shouting "eBay!" :^)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    14. Re:Come one by lakeland · · Score: 1
      Police states document stuff like that meticulously.

      Which movie was that in again? I forget.

    15. Re:Come one by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Read "Dark Sun" (sequel to "Making Of The Atomic Bomb"). We found out a hell of a lot after the fall of the Soviet Union; for instance we know now that the Rosenbergs actually were spies.

      I'm sure you've also heard of the detailed records the Nazis kept regarding the Holocaust (whoa, dangerously close to invoking Godwin).

      There were media reports in the last few weeks of Iraqi soldiers and Baath party officials loading up convoys of vehicles with files and documentation. Don't think it was their 401K records.

    16. Re:Come one by suss · · Score: 1

      how many iraq's have a computer

      Well, from the pictures of the looting, a lot more than a couple days ago.


      And ofcourse there's always Saddam's stash of PS2's. ..

      How hard would it be to make those net-ready?

  3. Why do I feel like... by FatSean · · Score: 1

    ...Iraq is going to become a world power in open-relays and general SPAMishness?

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:Why do I feel like... by TheMidget · · Score: 1
      ...Iraq is going to become a world power in open-relays and general SPAMishness?

      Yeah, so Bush's son too will have an excuse to invade Iraq: stop spam!

    2. Re:Why do I feel like... by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      Yeah, so Bush's son too will have an excuse to invade Iraq: stop spam!

      Why worry. It's not as if GWB needed a reason to invade Iraq.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  4. GeekCorps by AbdullahHaydar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geeks should definitely get involved and they should do it through GeekCorps since that works through the PeaceCorps and international organizations.

    --


    Suicide Booth: You are now dead! Thank you for using Stop and Drop, America's favorite since 2008.
    1. Re:GeekCorps by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 3, Informative
      I had dinner with Ethan Zuckerman, GeekCorps' founder, a couple weeks ago. He explained to me during a discussion of another underdeveloped region that GeekCorps was aimed primarily at places with almost nothing - places like Ghana and Mongolia that for-profit companies would not touch.

      Iraq has an internet infrastructure, a modern economy... There's money to be made there, and they are hardly backwater. They're not really GeekCorps territory at all, so don't expect to see them there.

    2. Re:GeekCorps by eMilkshake · · Score: 1
      Modern economy? You must not have seen yesterday's WSJ.

      Essentially, Iraq has not released any economic data, including population, since about 1973. Inflation has seemed to average 70% the last few years. Even super-secret Syria has published more economic data.

      In short, Iraq does not have an economy.

    3. Re:GeekCorps by charlesbakerharris · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you misread my message. I was comparing them to countries like Ghana and Mongolia. Iraq is not Europe or China or Japan or us, but they are far more modern than where Geekcorps goes.

      By your reasoning, since Enron didn't report their debt, they were one of the best companies in the world. Do you think that? How's your portfolio?

      Inflation's bad, but you have to have an economy to have inflation. Look at the pictures of Iraq. It's not mud huts, it's oil fields, houses made with actual architecture and construction, it's got large buildings and stores on the corner and cars everywhere.

      Going from what you said to "Iraq does not have an economy" is a Gallic leap of idiocy.

  5. What do you mean ? by Geekonomical · · Score: 1

    Does it mean that geeks are the group of people running around with a lotta cash in hands to do this sort of thing?

    Also it makes me wonder what kind of an internet infrastructure Iraq had in the first place! The article is sketchy on that!

  6. First things first by igaborf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?

    Yes, because, God knows, getting on the 'Net is every Iraqi's first priority at the moment.

    1. Re:First things first by outsider007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      no, first priority is hitting the saddam statue's head with a shoe. then breakfast. then getting on the net

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    2. Re:First things first by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      What's with the shoe thing anyway? Is that some sort of cultural difference? 'round here people hit with sticks, spit and generally destroy.

      Anyone with local cultural knowledge care to elaborate?

    3. Re:First things first by Alsee · · Score: 1

      What's with the shoe thing anyway? Is that some sort of cultural difference?

      Right. One of the news stations reported that it is considered an extreme insult. I guess it's similar to spitting on Sadam.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:First things first by KingRamsis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes :-) getting hit by shoe is in the arabic culture is an insult.
      it was not meant to destroy but to insult.
      Here in the arabic world it is an expression "I'm going to hit you with my shoe".

    5. Re:First things first by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      Well, they wanted the trout for breakfast.

      */me runs*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    6. Re:First things first by maelstrom · · Score: 2, Informative

      The shoe is considered dirty, so beating someone with a shoe is a grave insult reserved for servants. You would beat your family with a stick or your hand, enver your shoe. At least so says my online sources. I found this article enlightening.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
  7. IQ domains? How does it help? by cmburns69 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How does this help the Iraqi people? All this does is give the rest of the world more domain space, while not giving Iraq the full value of their "property".

    Why couldn't it be an Iraqi company that sells the domains? This would allow the country to keep all of the proceeds, instead of only getting some of the value.

    I'm not against the UK, the US, France or anybody, but I think this might be one area where this company is being opportunistic.

    An online Starcraft RPG? Only at
    In soviet Russia, all your us are belong to base!

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  8. Huh? by Evil+Adrian · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought Halliburton had a lucrative contract to do this too?

    --
    evil adrian
    1. Re:Huh? by workindev · · Score: 1

      Check your facts. Halliburton is not getting any contracts in Iraq.

      Kellogg Brown and Root, a Halliburton Subsidary, did win a contract to put out oil fires. However, considering that they are widely considered the best in the world at putting out oil well fires, and the fact that there are only a half dozen fires burning now, this shouldn't be big news to anybody.

  9. Dont expect a huge jump. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    I am sure Internet access for non government use is pritty low on the list. things like Food, Rebuiling infrastructure, maintaining political stability. Is more of a priority. But after that getting a good Internet connection is important if they want to compeet in todays buisness market. Who know if you do it right they will have a better country network layout then the rest of the world. I am just more aftraid of getting spam from mighty.iq or something.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Dont expect a huge jump. by Joey7F · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Let's not forget that Iraq is not Afghanistan. It is a "modern" country that had a scumbag for a leader.

      --Joey

      I am using modern in the context of the Middle East, it is not modern by Western European or American standards.

    2. Re:Dont expect a huge jump. by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Not bigoted, truthful. Truuuuthful! If someone tells you they are poor and their definition of poor is not being able to get the latest and greatest video card, wouldn't you say "You are poor by an upper middle class standards"

      A wealthy man in Ghana, Africa makes 3 dollars a week, but he is wealthy by Ghana standards not German standards for example.

      It's not like I said it was somehow impossible to modernize a bunch of towel wrapping sandmonkeys, I simply said, Iraq is modern compared to its neighbors.

      What's bigoted about that?

      --Joey

    3. Re:Dont expect a huge jump. by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      The Middle East is backwater. Where have you been? Iraq is one of the more moderate (religiously) countries along with having a precious natural resource.

      Great things can, and probably will, come to Iraq.

      Not only that, (here is where I step out on to a limb) after several years of Iraqi democratic rule it will inspire other Middle Eastern countries to attempt coups(probably with the help of covert US operations). The Israel peace proccess gets a bump from Palestinians who realize they have been led by murderers and thugs. They rise up, implement democracy and a palestinian state is formed.

      Soon, dictatorships start falling left and right.

      Sure, this might be extremely optimistic, and the more cynical among us will be quick to trash this as some idealistic rant, but truly believe this will happen (maybe not quite the way I layed it out) in 50-60 years.

      I believe our grandchildren will think of Iraq the way we ("we" if you are a babyboomlet) think of Japan.

      --Joey

  10. wonder what happed too... by Jupiter9 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know what happened to this Iraqi's web blog. It was an interesting read at the beginning of the war.

    --

    --
    Does anyone remember /\/\/\?
    1. Re:wonder what happed too... by lysium · · Score: 1

      Raed is hopefully just offline for the near to medium future. I am really hoping he didn't, say, get a HARM missile locked onto his satelite uplink....

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    2. Re:wonder what happed too... by privacyt · · Score: 2, Informative
      I'd like to know what happened to this Iraqi's web blog [blogspot.com]. It was an interesting read at the beginning of the war.

      The Baghdad telecommunications got wiped out on the 25th, according to news reports. And as of last night, Baghdad still didn't have electicity. (Also keep in mind that as of today, the US only controls half the city, according to the latest from CNN.)

      So it could be awhile. I sure hope Salam is surviving the looting and anarchy. (He lives in a wealthy part of Baghdad.) It will be fascinating to see what he says when he is able to post again.

  11. Blog by an Iraqi by privacyt · · Score: 1

    Here's a weblog by an Iraqi citizen living in Baghdad: "Where is Raed?" I think all of you will find it to be of great interest. (BTW, I hope he survived the war. His last post was Mrch 24.)

  12. Yah, this is SUPER IMPORTANT for Iraq. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

    The Iraqi people have been living without adequate food and water under an oppressive regime for the past 20 years.

    Apparently, they've also been living without adequate access to online pornography, too.

    We'll wait for someone else to fix those first two things.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Yah, this is SUPER IMPORTANT for Iraq. by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      that is soooo tasteless...

    2. Re:Yah, this is SUPER IMPORTANT for Iraq. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      You've completely missed the point.

      Why on earth should we be worried about Iraq's networking capabilities when we're still fucking bombing them? Can we worry about that for a little while first? Shouldn't their ability to buy DVDs from Amazon be slightly lower on our list of things to do?

      I guess I score some points for offending you, though.

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  13. Salem Pax by limekiller4 · · Score: 1

    Speaking of which, anyone have any info on the whereabouts of Salem Pax?

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
    1. Re:Salem Pax by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      If he's still alive, he's probably in Baghdad waiting for the war to end. It will be interesting to see if he ever posts in his blog again.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  14. Sure, but what are we going to put down? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

    I see Iraq as a great oppurtunity to experiment. You've got this large area of land that isn't infected with shitty phone lines, yet full of people that could use the internet. I'd say lay plans for an extensive cable network, or perhaps try out a wireless mesh / hive method.

    After that, at least one country is not going to be held back by crappy monopolies, technology-wise at least. It'd be great to point at Iraq and say, "See, this works. We should do this." At the same time, the Iraqi people are gonna have a piping fast internet connection, or at least one that can handle a load of 20 million people hitting the porn sites all at once.

    --
    You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    1. Re:Sure, but what are we going to put down? by Draveed · · Score: 1

      Well Iraq is gonna be "infected" with phone lines sooner than any sort of cable network because Iraqis are gonna want to make phone calls long before they feel like getting online to check the weather or swap mp3s.
      Once the phones come in, dialup will follow. Then AOL can create a new subsidiary, Iraq Online, and bombard that country with CDs promising 1000 free hours.

      --
      Oh, Edmund, can it be true? that I hold here, in my mortal hand, a nugget of purest green?
    2. Re:Sure, but what are we going to put down? by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Funny, but most broadband services offer digital telephone over the cable line. Now isn't that something? It's only a signal carried at a certain frequency, much like your cable modems and your cable television. Three different techs, but you can fit them all harmoniously into one big fat cable pipe.

      Phone lines should die some time. They're really only good as bird perches.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    3. Re:Sure, but what are we going to put down? by Draveed · · Score: 1

      That won't happen because the entire country hasn't been leveled. The US spent a lot of money on bombs designed only to destroy a very particular spot. So a lot of the old buildings are still standing with their old-time phone lines. I'd bet its cheaper to repair the damaged phone infrastructure than to wire every Iraqi house with cable.

      A place like Afghanistan would be better suited to this "cable the country" plan. It will of course come down to cost. What's cheaper to do - run cable or telephone wires?

      --
      Oh, Edmund, can it be true? that I hold here, in my mortal hand, a nugget of purest green?
  15. big oppurtunity by abhisarda · · Score: 1

    The oppurtunity after the situation stabilizes is great. In Afghanisthan a man with a 10,000 $ investment made 500,000 $ in a matter of 6-8 months buying property and selling it.
    Trying to fund the reconstruction through this effort is fine but one has to be aware that there are also chances that domain name squatters will take over.

  16. give them dignity? by dAzED1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    as someone mentioned, they have lots of oil. Its very easy to get from the ground there (as compared to oil in texas, alaska, etc) and Iraqi oil is even very low in sulphites as compared to its neighboring countries, making it very cheap to refine.

    They don't need our money to build an isp or some such thing. There really are, you know, more important things than the internet. They need food, medicine, and a little help rebuilding a government. Once that's done, they need to be left alone, and they need us as far away from them as possible. And I say that, having been in support of our actions from even before we started ;)

    1. Re:give them dignity? by Sloppy · · Score: 1
      as someone mentioned, they have lots of oil.
      And the easiest way for me to get some of that black gold, is to sell them porn. Keeping in the true spirit of America, I say the government owes me an Iraqi information infrastructure. My porn-for-oil business requires it, therefore I'm entitled. BTW, I also need a law that prohibits others from competing with me.

      It's just common sense, that anyone who doesn't support me on this, is an anti-business longhair hippy communist, probably with terrorist ties. It would be just like an anti-American religous fundamentalist, to get in the way of my porn-for-oil business.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    2. Re:give them dignity? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

      wouldn't a "anti-business longhair hippy communist" and a "anti-American religous fundamentalist" be members of two very different groups? ;)

    3. Re:give them dignity? by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      ARE YOU QUESTIONING ME!???!?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  17. Won't work by LowneWulf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't rebuilding the Internet in Iraq require other critical resources first?

    You know.... like ELECTRICITY?

    Seriously, this is pathetic! Basically some company trying to profit off selling country code domain names to sites not in the country, while there's still too much chaos for anyone inside the country to take notice!

    1. Re:Won't work by r00zky · · Score: 1

      yea, just what we need, another company trying to profit... just like the UK and US gov's

      --
      I'm a chainsmokin' alcoholic sociopath, so-ci-o-path
    2. Re:Won't work by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Informative
      I think it's a mistake to take a short-term view when talking about rebuilding a country.

      There are obvious short-term needs which must be met, such as food and water. This is a no-brainer. The difficult part to rebuilding a country is taking advantage of the fact that you're essentially creating from whole cloth, and thus have the opportunity to either do things very right or completely cock it up.

      Therefore, this is the time to talk about rebuilding Iraq's internet, especially given that the sort of freedom allowed by the internet could conceivably be an effective force for continued liberty in that country.

      Iraq is a potentially wealthy country; I'd like to see that used for good things (net) rather than bad (weapons, oppression of its people, enriching Dick Cheney's friends, etc).

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:Won't work by wolf- · · Score: 1

      Exactly!
      Additionally, the header implies an infrastructure project, and it ends up being domain name sales? Please.

      When the basic needs are supplied, there are plenty of us in the open source world willing to donate time to help native Iraqis rebuild their network infrastructure.

      --
      ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
    4. Re:Won't work by Platypii · · Score: 1

      I realize it's easier to just stereotype iraq as a desolate third world nation, but as a matter of fact in baghdad, as of yesterday IIRC, the city still had power, water, and even mass media. So, although you may be right about there being too much chaos for this to be noticed, the infrastructure and resources are in fact there.

    5. Re:Won't work by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      I think it's a mistake to take a short-term view when talking about rebuilding a country.

      We always overestimate change in the short term and underestimate it in the long term.

      and thus have the opportunity to either do things very right or completely cock it up.

      I think there's a lot of latitude in between.

  18. OK, whatever... by Otter · · Score: 3, Funny
    the article does make me wonder: Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?

    You're asking one of two questions:

    Q) "I'm planning to do something to help rebuild Iraq's communications. Is that a good idea?"

    A)That's great! Bless you!

    Q) "Should "we" / "the community" / hackers / geeks do something to help rebuild Iraq's communications?"

    A) Uhhh, sure. Go open a Sourceforge project.

    Re: .iq domains -- I can see high.iq and low.iq going, and probably sex.iq. I suspect oil is going to continue to drive their economy, though.

    1. Re:OK, whatever... by igaborf · · Score: 1
      I can see high.iq and low.iq going, and probably sex.iq.

      That's just pathet.iq.

  19. The Extension... by CyborgWarrior · · Score: 1

    .IQ... No, not for Iraq. Maybe like a .NEWB

    --
    If you can't say something nice, make sure you have something heavy to throw.
  20. Is low.iq taken? by Demon-Xanth · · Score: 1

    Because I could make it the next Darwin Awards and Computer Stupidities site. And bash.org, LOOK OUT!

    --
    If you think education is expensive, you should try ignorance -- Derek Bok, president of Harvard
  21. Right by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The war has left Iraq's Internet infrastructure in shambles

    Because it was so absolutely fantastic even before the first cruise missile was launched at Baghdad.

    Typical leftie FUD.

    Just like Afghanistan, except that over there at least they managed to dig out their C64's and connect over a 2400 baud modem and email Katz with alacrity.

    In any case, I'm sure Iraq has bigger problems right now, like, oh, food and water.

  22. G dub says ... by didjit · · Score: 1

    why don't we give the contract to Halliburton.

  23. This is more about $$$ for a Bitish company by lysium · · Score: 1

    1. Sell .iq domains (incidentally making fistfuls of money) 2. ??? 3. Rebuild the Iraq infastructure

    --
    Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    1. Re:This is more about $$$ for a Bitish company by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      4. Learn how to use HTML.

    2. Re:This is more about $$$ for a Bitish company by da2 · · Score: 1

      surely it should be £££ for a bRitish company

    3. Re:This is more about $$$ for a Bitish company by lysium · · Score: 1

      No, a throwaway comment isn't worth the effort.

      --
      Together, we will drive the rats from the tundra.
    4. Re:This is more about $$$ for a Bitish company by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

      I totally agree.

  24. Should yiou take the lead by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online

    Before Gulf war 1 Iraq wasn't that badly off. 2 episodes of having the stuffing knocked out of them by the USA, with a decade of brutal sanctions in-between have reduced them to poverty. I'd say that the USA owes the ordinary people of Iraq big time.

    Is food, water, electricity, abcense of falling bombs and no armed bandits or looters more important? Well duh. But if and when you get past rebuilding those, the Internet is a marvelous communications mechanism. Communications aid free speech and democracy, or so I'm told.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

    1. Re:Should yiou take the lead by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Before Gulf war 1 Iraq wasn't that badly off. 2 episodes of having the stuffing knocked out of them by the USA, with a decade of brutal sanctions in-between have reduced them to poverty. I'd say that the USA owes the ordinary people of Iraq big time.

      Nice troll.

      I don't suppose that ridding them of the dictator that caused the armed conflicts in the first place, along with the "brutal sanctions" counts for anything.

      No, it's not that simple, but your statement ignored even more of reality.

      I certainly agree that helping setup Internet services (once the far, far more critical needs are restored) would certainly help create a more democratic atmosphere. And while I don't think this should be done pro bono, I also take a dim view of what this company is doing - as another poster suggested, let an Iraqi company handle it when the time comes.

    2. Re:Should yiou take the lead by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Bullshit.

      Last time I checked it was the Iraqis fault for letting a butcher take control of their country, invade another country, and subsequently get beaten back to Baghdad. The sanctions were put in place through a UN vote, including the UK, not by the US alone. It also shows the world that sanctions against despots don't work.

      We giving them freedom, what else do we owe them?

      But you're right, Iraq had the highest per-capita income in the middle-east before the first war. All of this started because of Saddam's greed in invading Kuwait.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:Should yiou take the lead by Tolleman · · Score: 1

      Saddam's greed? Wasnt the Kuwaitians drilling oil in his country? and then the kuwaitians launched a massive pr campain to make saddam look like the bad guy (that time).

    4. Re:Should yiou take the lead by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't say the US owes them anything for the first war (after all Iraq had it coming) however they most certainly do for the second. It was an outright act of agression against a shattered country.


      The US have a responsibilty to rebuild it, though I suspect they'll just screw the Iraqis out of their oil before any substantial aid will be forthcoming.

    5. Re:Should yiou take the lead by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      What the fuck have you been smoking? Links please.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    6. Re:Should yiou take the lead by pi+radians · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't suppose that ridding them of the dictator that caused the armed conflicts in the first place, along with the "brutal sanctions" counts for anything

      From BigEye:

      In the 1980s the United States supported Saddam's totalitarian regime and showed little concern for its victims. American exports helped launch Iraq's biological weapons program. Saddam's horrific violations of international law, such as his use of poison gas on the battlefield, had minimal effect on US-Iraqi cooperation. And while the tilt toward Saddam began with Jimmy Carter ("We see no fundamental incompatibility of interests between the US and Iraq" -- National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, April 1980), it was the Reagan and Bush I administrations that brought it to full flower.

      All of this has long been a matter of public record. US shipments of deadly biological agents to Iraq, for example, were detailed in a 1994 Senate Banking Committee report and a follow-up letter from the Centers for Disease Control in 1995. They showed that Iraq was allowed to purchase batch after batch of lethal pathogens -- anthrax, botulism, E. coli, West Nile fever, gas gangrene, dengue fever. At a time when Washington knew that Iraq was using chemical weapons to kill thousands of Iranian troops, the CDC was shipping germ cultures directly to the Iraqi unconventional weapons facility in al-Muthanna.

      Ignoring reality is something American's do best. Toppling Saddam's reign wasn't an act of kindness to the Iraqi people, it was making up for a 25 year old mistake.

      USA owes everyone in Iraq more than you could ever imagine. Unfortunately, this is only the beginning. On to Iran, Saudi Arabia, Palestine, etc...

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    7. Re:Should yiou take the lead by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The US of A hasn't got any responsibility to rebuild this country


      Sure it does. It is one of those that pummelled it into dust whilst 'liberating' it. Or did the US free the Iraqi people so they can die in droves from disease, malnutrition and civil war whilst living in the squalor of a devastated country? Some freedom.


      Saddam flaunted international law and brought about this action.


      And the US flaunted international law by unilaterally attacking Iraq without a UN mandate and while there were peaceful solutions, not least of which continued weapons inspections.


      Look at Castro, he's been living under sanctions for god knows how long and the people of Cuba have sufferred for this long because the USA has been unwilling to take action.


      I see. So Cuba should have been put out of its misery because evil old Fidel wouldn't kow tow to US foreign policy.


      A country known to have possessed deadly WMDs and provide training and support for terrorist groups such as Hamas.


      And I suppose you have the proof to hand for all this, not the wild speculation that some people mistake for facts these days? Certainly they had WMD and perhaps even possess some yet, but until proof arrives you are not in a position to emphatically claim anything. The evidence so far amounts to smoke and mirrors (and downright lies and forgery too). Let's hope something turns up soon eh?

    8. Re:Should yiou take the lead by DrXym · · Score: 1
      The rest of the world, especially the US wasn't going to stand idly by while Saddam took over all of those oil fields. The invasion, brutality, tortures etc. gave a golden reason for those looking to take Kuwait back.


      That is why Saddam had it coming. The reaction to his aggression was so predictable that he may as well have asked to be attacked.


      As for the current incursion, I believe it is completely unjustified. At the end of the day it boils down to oil - not just the selling of it but the control of it too.

    9. Re:Should yiou take the lead by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      You sound as if the USA bears ultimate responsibility for the sufferring of the Iraqi people.

      Countries are generally considered responisible for the bombs that they drop, yes. Also consider this: when Madeleine Albright was asked in 1996 about sanction againt Iraq, whether the "death of a half million children was worth the price", Albright's response was, 'That's a tough question, but yes we think the price is worth it.' By now that figure has risen to 1 million.

      Legally the USA has responsibility to the citizens of the USA and no one, i repeat, no one else.

      You have made that only too clear, the way you behave.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    10. Re:Should yiou take the lead by DrXym · · Score: 1
      How about the US training and arming Kurds to attack Iraq? Or destabilizing democratic elections in Chile and supporting right wing dictators such as Pinochet? Or attempting to asassinate Fidel Castro? Or selling weapons to oppresive regimes like Iraq & Iran? etc.


      The US has no moral high ground here. Their foreign policy is completely ammoral and attempts to justify it in terms of good and evil is just pure bullshit. Stop thinking in such simplistic terms and consider what they have to gain by removing Saddam, not the lies they use to appeal for public support.

    11. Re:Should yiou take the lead by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      it's called the ratqa oil field. where the hell have you been? did you pay attention to the news at all?

      please, learn about the issue at hand before accusing people of having drug addictions.

    12. Re:Should yiou take the lead by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Show me evidence it was based on freeing the Iraqi people, or WMD. Oh that's right you're an anonymous coward without even the balls to stand up for your opinion.

    13. Re:Should yiou take the lead by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Which is why I said it wasn't so simple... neither was our support of Hussein (who was already in power btw, we didn't put him there), or pretty much anything in the Real World.

      And frankly, I do consider the toppling of him to be fixing a problem we helped cause. But if we hadn't supported him in the late 70s and 80s then it's entirely possible that Iran would've taken over Iraq... which would've been disasterous for the entire Middle East (and thus the world).

    14. Re:Should yiou take the lead by DrXym · · Score: 1
      Pummelled? You mean the hospitals, sewage facilities, food storages, etc. were "pummelled.


      Yes pummelled. The whole infrastructure has been blasted to bits. There is no food, no money, no produce, no law and order. The coalition makes a big deal about not hitting hospitals and other facilities but they stand by while the looters raid them instead. Another flagrant violation of international law.


      Do you honestly believe that there was a peaceful solution to stopping Saddam from torturing, raping, and murdering Iraqis? If so, how?


      What the sovereign nation of Iraq did to its own people is none of the United State's business. It's not like the US gives a damn about the torture, rape and murder that happens in Turkey, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Indonesia, Georgia, Colombia or anywhere else for that matter, so why Iraq?


      The answer is it doesn't. US foreign policy is ammoral. It doesn't care about such things but they make convenient excuses to rouse public opinion when necessary.


      Oh, and you should grab a dictionary and look up the word "unilateral," because it's hard to describe 46 allied countries as "unilateral."


      LOL. I bet the coalition of the willing was grateful to have Micronesia on board. Most countries on that list gave no support at all or restrict it to a humanitarian / medical / chemical roles.


      You mean a regime that welcomed Soviet nuclear missles into his backyard so that the Soviets could strike us within minutes?


      You mean the regime that had just fought off a CIA funded and equipped attack at the Bay of Pigs? You mean that regime? I wonder why they didn't think kindly of the US after that. Of course, what about the Turkish regime that first allowed US missiles into their country so they could strike the USSR within minutes? And are those missiles still there?

  25. knowledge is power by e2d2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one said they should spend the money they receive for food and health instead on Internet access. They simply want to build the Internet infrastructure in Iraq into something that can be used by the masses. I would say freedom of information coincides quite nicely with the coalitions effort to build Iraq into a land free people. Pulling these people out of the knowldege embargo imposed by Saddam Hussein and his regime will help freedom survive in an area of the world that is known for it's denial of free information to citizens. Knowledge _IS_ power. When Iraqi citizens can get equal acess to information they can see other side of the coin, instead of the state controlled side only. Why do you think so many totalitarian governments want to control the Internet access to their countries (CHINA)? So it does coincide with the freedom initiative quite well.

    Besides you have to start the plans now to rebuild if you want to get it done later. This type of rebuilding is going to last a lifetime and take a tremendous amount of planning and effort.

    1. Re:knowledge is power by jefu · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Clearly things like food, water, medical support, electricity need to be the top priority.

      But I'd say that access to information and freedom of speech/press are also essential parts of a healthy democratic society - and I'd even suggest that the lack of such is usually a major factor in the survival of totalitarian regimes. It is not coincidence that early symptoms of a government in the process of becoming fascist include restrictions on what people can say and to whom, the construction of an information monitoring infrastructure to spy on what people are thinking, and increasing numbers of things (rules, groups and the like) which are maintained as secrets.

      Selling ".iq" domain names though is just a transparent way for some company with no other products worth selling to make a quick buck or three.

      Somehow though, seeing things like the Patriot Act and Patriot II, I doubt that the current administration has any more interest in supporting free speech in Iraq than they do in the US.

      <personal-odd-note>
      I suggested rather a while back that it might be an interesting alternative to war to find an effective way to increase free speech in Iraq (and Afghanistan) by building and distributing simple/cheap internet access devices along with a robust network and sufficient encryption to foil attempts by the totalitarian governments to block/intercept communications. Undoubtedly a completely crazy notion. But I look at what must be done to produce and maintain a stable democratic government and believe that education and freedom of speech are surely essentials. So I wonder if its probably not more effective to try to make a totalitarian regime difficult to maintain (or to build) than to need to destroy it afterwards. (Isn't it generally cheaper to provide vaccinations than to have to cure a disease?)
      </personal-odd-note>

    2. Re:knowledge is power by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      "with the coalitions effort to build Iraq into a land free people."

      hehehe, it's true, it's true.


      I knew someone would comment on that and I almost put a disclaimer in stating that the US administration has emphasized this goal and I and everyone else has skepticism about it's ability to do so given it's history of destroying countries in the name of "fighting communism" and a million other hobgoblins. BUT that being said I do think that these things can have a mind of their own and the people of Iraq and the rest of the world have stated clearly that the Iraqi people WILL be in charge of this democracy regardless of the current US administration's agenda.

      So yes, continue to be skeptical of those in power, I know I am. But don't give up on the idea of freedom for everyone, Iraq included.

    3. Re:knowledge is power by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      stated clearly that the Iraqi people WILL be in charge of this democracy regardless of the current US administration's agenda.

      Proof positive of a democratic Iraqi government acting autonomously will be when it finally does act contrary to the current US administrations agenda.

      When that happens, the new Iraqi government will acquire greater legitimacy in the eyes of the world at large (not being just a puppet government), while at the same time being viewed as ungrateful by many in the United States.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    4. Re:knowledge is power by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would say freedom of information coincides quite nicely with the coalitions effort to build Iraq into a land free people.

      I would remind everyone that freedom of information existed long before the Internet.

    5. Re:knowledge is power by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      Do you mean in those "approved books" on library shelves you read or the newpapers that are afraid to say anything outside of the status quo? What about the slanted News programs we see every night on TV sets waving the flag? Wouldn't you like another source of information? Don't you think the Iraqi people would like the same thing?

      Would you go so far as to argue that the Internet does not help the spread of information? I would argue that it has had an affect similiar to the Gutenberg press by assisting the spread of information. Anyone can post a website on the Internet if he/she has access. Can you do the same with other forms of media? The barriers are much lower and hence the world has changed because of it.

    6. Re:knowledge is power by demonlapin · · Score: 1
      He was laughing at your typo, dude. "a land free people" instead of "a land of free people". I must say, though I think he's dead wrong, it is pretty funny.

      (Kinda like Tom Tomorrow or Boondocks, that way; can't stand the politics, but they're funny as hell.)

    7. Re:knowledge is power by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      lol, oh shit I totally missed that and got caught up in my own rhetoric. Too funny :-)

  26. We need to stop the profiteering by JoeBuck · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If people in the US and the UK value their lives, they will resist the impulse to try to turn Iraq into a colony that is run for corporate profit. (And yes, that's what this is, even though these guys are masquerading as a charity: they intend to take a cut from selling the "high.iq" domain). Iraq's domain namespace belongs to the Iraqi people, not to a clever British IT consultancy. Similarly, the decision as to whether to deploy GSM or CDMA belongs to the future Iraqi government, not to a congressman in the pocket of Qualcomm. Next, we'll see a bunch of Midwestern farmers clamor to get the government to buy up their grain and dump it on Iraq, thereby setting back efforts to rebuild Iraqi agriculture (which employs far more Iraqis than the oil industry does).

    We're now at a tipping point: we can either insist that Iraq be run in the interest of Iraqis, or we can allow it to be taken over by a bunch of cronies and lobbyists. If the latter happens, we'll generate so much hate that it will be unsafe for Americans and Brits to travel abroad.

    1. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by GeorgeTheGiraffe · · Score: 1

      Next, we'll see a bunch of Midwestern farmers clamor to get the government to buy up their grain and dump it on Iraq...

      Uhhh, I think Australia is gonna beat us to it.

      The donations include $60 million from the United States, $565,000 from New Zealand, $1.6 million from Spain, $12.7 million from Britain and $6.46 million from Germany. Australia has donated 100 tons of wheat.

    2. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by wandernotlost · · Score: 1
      I'm sick of liberals like you making us seem to be the bad guys. We have said all along that we will not try to rule Iraq. This is not Victorian English or the brief period of American Imperialism. We are not colonists anymore. Wake up. You may not like Bush or Blair, but their plan all along has NOT been to take over Iraq. People like you are always looking to start trouble.

      Umm...I think someone else needs to wake up here. Perhaps you didn't notice that nearly the entirety of the Arab world bears animosity directed at us? It's not exactly going to help our campaign against terrorism if we wantonly disregard our recurring appearance of self-interest in this conflict.

      While we're onto the name calling... (Why is it that one always hears people labelling "liberals" as such as if it were a dirty word? What part of "free", and "not narrow or contracted in mind" do you find to be so sinister?) Are you conservatives really so feeble-minded that you can't imagine any subtlety in a situation? Time and time again I hear arguments such as yours, that essentially state, "we are not making Iraq a formal province of the United States, therefore everything is fine and good, and our plans clearly have no imperialist or sinister consequence."

      Guess what? This war is about oil. The US and Britain are displaying characteristics of imperialism. No, we're not going to simply take over the Iraqi oil fields and run them by American corporations, but you'd have to be a fool to suggest that this war won't have an impact on the availability and pricing of oil in the future. American and British companies are getting enormous contracts for rebuilding the Iraqi infrastructure that our forces destroyed. We are taking Iraqi assets by force and injecting them into the American and British economies.

      Of course, a portion of this is just a simple consequence of war, but there are some huge conflicts of interest involved, and in many cases they are being handled with an extraordinary lack of grace. The fact is, this war primarily serves American interests. It is not an altruistic liberation of the Iraqi people. In the end, we will most likely leave the majority of the Iraqi people better off than they were before the war, but no matter how many times you try to say otherwise, this war still is primarily about using American military might to secure American interests. Again, that's not the only factor, but it's unavoidably the primary driving influence.

    3. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by pubjames · · Score: 1

      If people in the US and the UK value their lives, they will resist the impulse to try to turn Iraq into a colony that is run for corporate profit.

      Ahh, call me an old cynic, but isn't that what this war is all about? Or should I take the popular view, that we are doing this to give the Iraqi people "Freedom" because we're such nice people?

      You see, rebuilding Iraq is going to be tremendous business. Marvellous. And most of it is going to go to the USA. You see, Iraqi's have the means to pay for rebuilding their country. They've got oil. Not like Africa, or Afghanistan. We don't want to be building them up, giving them democracy, do we? No profit in it.

      I wonder if those silly Brits would be so pro war if they knew that they are still repaying the USA for the Second World War. Oh yes, they still owe $346 million dollars - they should have paid off their debt by 2006. And they've been paying since 1945.

      Those Iraqi's, they're going to pay. Oh yes. And for a couple or three more generations. And we are going to say "Look at us! We are so moral and good!"

    4. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      I'm more worried about Arab carpet-baggers decending on Iraq and turning it into a second rate Afghanastan.

      $G

      --
      -- $G
    5. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by thopkins · · Score: 1

      We are securing safety for America by elimating a threat to our security. If you consider that to be "securing American interests" that's fine with me. I'd rather get rid of the terrorist supporters in the world than die in a terrorist attack. If oil is the big key, why did the United States go into Afghanistan? There's no oil there. It was for security, as this war is. Yes, it isn't really about freeing the Iraqi people, but there's nothing wrong with positive consequences.

    6. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by mfrank · · Score: 1

      We'll do a hell of a lot more business with an Iraq that has a large middle class and high standards of living.

      Who's our biggest trading partners now? Who can we have better business with, North or South Korea?

      We've made more money selling Starcraft games to South Korea than selling anything to North Korea.

      And as far as debt from WWII, I'd be willing to bet that the US govt still owes a hell of a lot more than 345 million dollars, especially if you add in the money spent on the Marshall Plan.

      We're not doing it because of greed, and we're not doing it because we're nice guys. A free and democratic Iraq is in the US's best interest now.

    7. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by BeBoxer · · Score: 1

      I'd rather get rid of the terrorist supporters in the world than die in a terrorist attack.

      Damn right! It's about time we dealt with Saudi Arabia! Oh wait, never mind.

    8. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by cpeterso · · Score: 1


      If oil is the big key, why did the United States go into Afghanistan? There's no oil there.

      Afghanistan might not have a lot of oil, but for years the US has been trying to install oil pipelines through Afghanistan to carry oil from the Caspian Sea (sitting on 200 billion barrels of oil).

      Afghanistan + Oil = "Crusade against terrorism"

      "The pipeline was to run from Turkmenistan via Afghanistan to the Port of Karachi. However the Taleban refused. Until now America has not been successful in persuading the Taleban to change its mind."

    9. Re:We need to stop the profiteering by spun · · Score: 1

      We are in no way securing our safety, nor are we eliminating a threat to our security. That is plain ludicrous. Saddam, bottled up in Iraq, was never a threat to the US. Iraq was in no way responsible for 9/11. No legitimate connection between Iraq and terrorism has ever been proven. Did anyone really think Saddam crazed or stupid enough to attack the US?

      Now that we are waging war against Iraq, what is to stop Saddam and some of his generals from slipping out of the country with all the WMD? How much do you want to bet that we find neither Saddam nor his much vaunted weapons? I would also be willing to bet that this is used as an excuse to invade Syria.

      We are inflaming hatred for the US worldwide by our actions. How does this make us more safe?

      US citizens believe the propaganda because to believe otherwise would mean rising up against real evil right here at home. It would mean changing our way of life, and we are not willing to do that. Instead we believe the lies that we are fed, and feel good about ourselves as heroes and liberators.

      I think this is also why believers of the propaganda are so vitriolic in their attacks against those of us who don't believe the lies.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  27. AOL by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    This is the perfect opportunity to allow AOL to try and get a monopoly in a new market!
    ...Of course it can't be called AOL... because the A stands for America, and we don't want to give the impression that we're colonizing the place
    and well.. IOL (Iraq Online),,, might offend others who have connote the word Iraq with Saddam...
    Well perhaps we could just tear something down and put it on ebay!

    1. Re:AOL by Surreal_Streaker · · Score: 1

      How about LOL (Liberation On Line)?

  28. The Geek Cross by Zapateria · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why can't we set up kind of a geeky Red Cross to deliver free or heavily subsidised computer equipment and internet connections to war torn countries?

    Surely it would go a long way to helping such countries as Iraq get back on their feet.

  29. Why not by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    Sure. Lets take my tax dollars, or maybe even create a new Internet tax, so we can use the money to get high speed Internet to the mud huts in the nation with the world's second largest oil reserves. After all, there are plenty of looters there that want to be able to sell the stuff they snatched on e-bay.

    Of course, we have yet to see how things will turn out there, and with the power vacuum it might well turn out that the people put in place a lunatic like they did in Iran, but that's certainly no reason for us to be cautious before we give them plenty of things that many U.S. communities don't even have yet. Lets take from our own people and give to the people that hate us, just look at how well that has served us throughout the world.

    But don't just go by my opinion, ask our good friends the French.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  30. Where is Salam Pax? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

    Anybody heard of the Iraqi blogger since the end of March?

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  31. The .iq TLD.. by molo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The .iq TLD should belong to the people of Iraq. They should have the final say as to who gets access to it. Selling it off like .tv and .cx today would basicly mean that this ISP is taking advantage of these people because their government is in shambles. Shame on them.

    -molo

    --
    Using your sig line to advertise for friends is lame.
    1. Re:The .iq TLD.. by KingRamsis · · Score: 1

      well I guess if you extended this concept, the same apply for the Iraqi oil, and other resources..
      And Dubya and his girlfriend-blair do not have the moral authority to decide who will rebuilt Iraq after war.

    2. Re:The .iq TLD.. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I demand .us should belong to the people of the United States!

  32. Let them do it by gclef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why should "geeks around the world" take the lead on this? Why shouldn't we let the Iraqis do this? Granted, the present owner is having issues...one of the technical contacts for .iq is presently being held by the feds for contact with Hamas, but I really think that this would be better handled by the Iraqis themselves.
    If they want help, we should absolutely offer it, but I don't like the implied statement of "Let's take this thing of the Iraqis, make something that we think is cool out of it, and then claim we're helping them with it."

  33. I've got a few .iq names to auction off... by lhbtubajon · · Score: 2

    mcdonalds.iq, yahoo.iq, and amazon.iq

    Shall we start the bidding at $1 million each?

  34. my donation by y2dt · · Score: 1

    "Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?"

    i'll donate a few copies of RedHat

  35. Spam from iraq by digitalgimpus · · Score: 1

    Is it important for your child to succed in life?
    Want to raise your childs IQ?

    Visit http://raiseyourchilds.iq/?2lj0398lkj4f2nhni2o3f23 hf02

  36. 180.iq by IronTek · · Score: 1

    ...The one way for Slashdot Trolls to up their IQ past 20.

  37. Perhaps by reelbk · · Score: 1

    If American, British, and Aussie geeks formed a coalition and ...

    --
    - A real programmer uses $ cat > a.out
  38. Datacenter capital of the world? by peterdaly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Would make for great datacenters. Does any other place in the world have a higher density of nuclear resistant underground bunkers?

    I am sure the US bunker buster bombs didn't get them all.

    -Pete

  39. Keep them alive! by Beetjebrak · · Score: 1

    I'd say there would be enough problems keeping the general population alive after a destructive war. Focus on that first! I don't think you'll find a single Iraqi who gives a shit about the internet at present..

    --
    Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
  40. I wonder if... by 3ryon · · Score: 1

    genius.iq is already taken?

  41. No. We should leave them alone. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    The reconstruction of Iraq has already been handed off to politically-connected construction and contracting companies, and thus is inherently completely corrupt. If you get involved with it, you are contributing to a corrupt situation and are, by extension, tainted by it.

    The correct thing to do here is to let international aid groups move in and give the Iraqis what they actually need: dependable sources of drinking and bathing water, rebuilt housing and infrastructure (IE roads and electric power), food they're accustomed to, and a little dignity. THIS means, fire Halliburton and let the U.N. handle the reconstruction (with generous funding from us). We shouldn't have started this war in the first place; now that it's over we should pull out and fund a U.N. driven recovery.

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    1. Re:No. We should leave them alone. by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      we should pull out and fund a U.N. driven recovery

      I completely disagree with you, but I must admit that I'd love to see this. The UN would end up in quagmire of tribal funds and factional conflicts as UN troops do their best not to offend anyone by actually defending themselves or imposing any order. Turkey would step all over Northern Iraq. Can you imagine the environmentally sensitive UN in charge of Iraqi oil reserves, exporting oil to the US? LOL. That would be fun to watch. You can bet the UN wouldn't hesitate to build it's a bunch of shiny new UN buildings though!

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    2. Re:No. We should leave them alone. by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      food they're accustomed to,

      That's code-speak for 'whatever vegetarian hippies in Berkeley say is right' isn't it?

      We shouldn't have started this war in the first place

      'Not in your name' dude. Why don't you go tell the newly freed Iraqi people you were backing Saddam all the way.

    3. Re:No. We should leave them alone. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      SN74S181 spat, "That's code-speak for 'whatever vegetarian hippies in Berkeley say is right' isn't it?"

      No, dipshit. What this means is, don't send them fucking hamburgers, give them what the people in the region eat. This shouldn't be too hard to research; the UN shouldn't have any trouble with it at all.

      Then, he said "'Not in your name' dude. Why don't you go tell the newly freed Iraqi people you were backing Saddam all the way"

      Sigh; why do these gung-ho types always stoop straight to the cheap shots? I'm so sick of you armchair warriors shooting your mouths off. Why don't you prove how tough you are and enlist? We'll throw you a going-away party.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    4. Re:No. We should leave them alone. by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying the UN would do that great a job. I'm just saying it's a really crummy idea to turn this war into a profiteering opportunity-grab. We shouldn't be over there; we shouldn't stick around now that it's effectively over with. The longer we're there, the more they're going to hate our guts, the more American soldiers are going to get wasted, and the worse our international reputation is going to get. We should get out, pronto, before the folks over there forget that we got rid of Saddam for them and start thinking "damn yankee invaders". Let someone else lose troops to suicide bombers. Let France send a few over. Let Germany pick up the slack. Bring our guys home, and show some integrity -- don't let corporate America make a profit over this thing. That's all I'm saying.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  42. Prepare for onslaught of by aengblom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FOOD/ELECTRICITY FIRST!

    Well, duh. But Iraq is no third or fourth world country. This is a fairly rich country with a pretty educated work force. Do they need Internet first? No, but will internet infastructure improve life? YES.

    Internet access is very much like phone lines. It's not just for leisure anymore-it moves information REALLY efficiently.

    Anyone who suggests otherwise should get their heads out of the 90s.

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  43. Think they've seen Shock and Awe? by stratjakt · · Score: 1


    Just wait until the first time they click on a goatse link.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  44. Remember Saddam's site? by JohnwheeleR · · Score: 1

    Here is a link to view sites under the (former) Iraqi government controlled ISP.

  45. Failures by Richy_T · · Score: 1
    I thought the internet was designed to route around failures. Perhaps Iraq should sue ARPA.

    :)

    Rich

  46. Food, Water, Power and the 'net by Phoenix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm quite sure that people are aware of the fact that damn near all of the Iraqi infrastructure is pretty well hosed.

    We're not that dumb.

    Instead of pissing and moaning about a company that seems to be acting like vultures circling over roadkill, perhaps consider the possibility that they might be looking into the long term?

    Yes the Iraqi people need food and water, that's a given. Yes they need stable power before the 'net can be rebuilt (that qualifies as a "no shit Sherlock"). But these are short term goals. If you want stability in the area you need to build (or in this case help build) a stable government and you need an economic foundation.

    It's a wonderful thing that SoDamn Insane is either dead or so far in hiding that they have to import sunlight. It's the greatest thing in the Iraqi world since sliced bread that the regime is falling down under the "Rolling Victory" of the US/UK troops. It's a blessed thing that food, water and other humanitarian aid is starting to trickle in as areas get cleared out.

    But without some way to build an economy, then it's all for naught. The Iraqi love us now. If we left them as a bombed out huck of a country then the attitude would change, they would hate us and we would probally end up once again with another warlord like Saddam and more terrorist acts against us.

    Frankly I'd like to think that by helping them re-build and to become a player in the global economy (for which the internet is a damn handy tool), then the goodwill for the US/UK will grow and we'll have another ally in the middle east.

    Or did you think that we'd just go over there, blow a whole lot of shit up for fun and oil profits then bugger back home in time for the summer trips to Disney World?

    Phoenix

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    1. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by jasontromm · · Score: 1

      Why should the average American taxpayer have to pay a penny to rebuild Iraq? These folks are sitting on the second largest oil reserve in the entire world. There's enough wealth under the ground to rebuild the entire country. Let them pay for their own rebuilding.

      --
      "Politicians always tell the truth, when they're calling each other liars."
    2. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by Phoenix · · Score: 1

      And how would you propose they get the oil out of the ground without a working infrastructure? Picks, shovels to dig the holes and then suck-siphon it out of the ground with garden hoses?

      Don't get me wrong by what I am about to say here...I'm all for what we're doing over there to help the Iraqi people but...

      Consider the following:
      In order to protect ourselves and out allies *we* decided to take out Saddam. In order to carry out that mission *we* crossed Iraqi borders. To protect our troops *we* crippled the Iraqi infrastructure to impair Saddam's ability to wage war. *We* killed the power. *We* bombed buildings. *We* destroyed TV Transmitter towers. *We* decided that those actions were reasonable and justified.

      Like I said, I'm all for what was done, watching the Iraqi people dancing in the streets thanking the US and UK troops proves it to me at least that this was needed and the (rather well hidden) wish of the Iraqi people to see the end of Saddam. However deep down we have to admit that *we* as a nation are responsible for every crater caused my us that used to be a transfomer sub-station and every burned out hulk that used to be a power generating station.

      Yes *we* as a nation. For we are all responsible for what happens in there. Either we are in the government, we voted in the government or we sat at home bitching how voting doesn't do a goddamn bit of good and thus decided that you weren't going to miss Survivor over it. Even those of us who took responsibility and voted against the current government has some responsibility as a caring human being seeing a people in trouble and lending a helping hand.

      Phoenix

      --
      -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
    3. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by mfrank · · Score: 1

      Why? Well, hopefully, it'll reduce the possibility that an American city gets nerve gassed or nuked. That a good enough reason?

      And price of oil will drop enough that you'll more than make up for it at the gas pump (and pretty much everything else you pay for has energy costs, too).

      I suppose you think the Marshall Plan was a real bad idea, too.

    4. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by phorm · · Score: 1

      We all do what we can. As nerds, this is what we do - and thus perhaps we should both applaud and assist an effort to rebuild the technological infastructure in Iraq.
      However, the optimistic hope that the ISP might be acting purely in the interests of Iraq. Well... you do read slashdot, right? You want to count the cases where seemingly "good intentioned" actions by large businesses go astray?

      People can have good intentions. Big businesses, in my experience, most often do not - unless it improves their bottom-line in the process.

    5. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by jasontromm · · Score: 1

      The Marshall Plan was a great idea. Europe does not have the vast natural resources that Iraq does. The Iraqis should be able to secure enough private loans based on the vast wealth beneath the sand to rebuild their own country.

      --
      "Politicians always tell the truth, when they're calling each other liars."
    6. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by jasontromm · · Score: 1

      Based on the fabulous wealth beneath their sands, the Iraqis should be able to secure enough commercial loans to buy all the equipment they need. Besides, most of the oil drilling equipment is already there. Sodamn Insane didn't get to burn the oil fields like he'd planned.

      --
      "Politicians always tell the truth, when they're calling each other liars."
    7. Re:Food, Water, Power and the 'net by mfrank · · Score: 1

      But it's also a PR campaign for the Arab world. It's worth it in the long run to be generous. It's vital that the Iraqi people don't feel like they're getting screwed over. You can say that we'll get bad press no matter what we do, but remember that, hopefully, in a year or two Iraq will have a free press that makes Al-Jazeera look like a bunch of fools, and it's pretty likely they'll be the most trusted source of news in the region. Unless, of course, we do something incredibly stupid like try to control what they say. Having the Iraqis not hate us would be a really good idea, and getting their country into good shape ASAP would be great way of doing it.

  47. i'll contribute! by kraksmoka · · Score: 1

    just let me know when i can buy www.high.iq

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  48. Extensive fiber optics by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    There is extensive fiber oprtics networks all through baghdad- of course they were used for military purposes.
    The best thing to do would be to repair the damaged sections and use that as a starting point after they have a government.

  49. Slashdot's new domain name! by Idou · · Score: 1

    low.iq

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  50. B-16.......BINGO!!!!! by Archfeld · · Score: 1

    Next Archer Daniels Midland will 'volunteer' several Tonnes (tons ?) of gene mod grain that will displace the native grown stuff, AND not reproduce, thereby completing the dependency cycle set up by the WMF, and WTO.

    Everyone knows when it is done for your own good everything always comes out in the end, right ?

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  51. saddam.iq by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
    I hope saddam.iq isn't taken so I can set up subdomains such as:

    SonOfTheSnake.saddam.iq
    MrBush.saddam.iq
    ChemicalAli.saddam.iq

    Damn, that'd make some cool naming for a warez se--- errr, linux distribution site.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  52. AOL - CDs by ralico · · Score: 1

    Well, there IS a stockpile of unused AOL CDs in the US, many of them in stylish metal jewel cases. (Which by the way if you spray paint to remove the offending logo, become useful and are quite durable).

    --

    SCO to Hell
  53. geek@high.iq by vierja · · Score: 1

    telnet smtp.mail.iq 25 mail from: geek@high.iq rcpt to: ... data hehe . quit

  54. Good ideas for the first domains: by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    www.potablewater.iq
    www.wheretogetfood.iq
    www.fi rstaid.iq
    www.stopthelooting.iq

    Which will not matter one bit until all the electricity is on and some sort of infrastructure is set up. From what I understand, very few Iraqis had access to the Internet.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  55. Re:Mensa.IQ ... et al. by jot445 · · Score: 1

    Excellent. Someone actually got that joke.

    --
    The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  56. What a dumb question. by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, really.

    First of all, the war is not over. Yet.

    Second, what the hell kind of question is Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online? "Take the lead"? Yeah, let's all go to Home Depot and pick up spools of cat5e cable and get on one of those "human shield" buses that aren't needed any longer and get to stringing. Not only are there many other priorities as others have pointed out but more likely than not you're calling on people that don't do volunteer work in their own communities to do some unspecified good deeds far far away.

    You don't need to ask slashdot if there are things to be done. If you want to help, then help, but you're asking the wrong people. You need to ask the Iraqis what they want and need (see above link on human shields). Perhaps you can contact the Iraqi Forum for Democracy or take a look at iraqipages.com for other contacts. If you are of a mind to do good works, help in your local community, which probably needs it since international attention is not focused on it and there are no lucrative contracts to be had.

    I'm not knocking your willingness to help. I think it's great. I think posting here is barking up the wrong tree though. Perhaps you can find out what really needs to be done and make a page for others to visit and contribute what they can.

  57. ihave@180.iq by Kenny+Austin · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see some of the new domain names.
    And of course a 90.iq pointing to goatsex

  58. Obviously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The true needs of the Iraqi people, like food and water, are what's most important right now. But things like Internet cafes seems like something we should be pushing for. The more that anybody knows about how the rest of the world works, the less likely it is that they will want to destroy it.

    If Iraqi's knew, for example, how peaceful life is in America, even for people like them, perhaps the few who hate us would be more likely to want to bring the same peace to Iraq, rather than deprive us of it.

    1. Re:Obviously... by bmf033069 · · Score: 1

      "If Iraqi's knew, for example, how peaceful life is in America, even for people like them, perhaps the few who hate us would be more likely to want to bring the same peace to Iraq, rather than deprive us of it."

      Actually, the world might be much better off it the situation turns out to be the other way around...

  59. Yeah... by scovetta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, look how well .tv did.

    --
    Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird. --Nietzsche
  60. do what you can the best you can by forgetmenot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand the sentiment of posters who complain that this is a dumb idea because they need help with food/water first, etc... blah.

    The best way to help the Iraqi's is to contribute whatever you can the best you can. If you're a skilled IT professional who can donate time to help rebuild their IT infrastructure.. GREAT! Why should anybody be complaining about that?

    Sure they need food. But there are PLENTY of agencies that can help with that and if you can donate some money to that cause, wonderful. It shouldn't stop you from contributing your niche knowledge too.

    When it comes to hands on skill I'll bet the vast majority of the /. readers wouldn't be able to physically help deliver meal packets or dig wells (ay least not as ably as the Red Cross or United Way could), so why not do something else that you CAN do?

    As a community the readership does have a skill in a particular industry and to suggest that the Iraqis won't need that kind of help because of other problems is nonsense. The sooner everyone does what they can according to their abilities the sooner we'll all be better off.

    1. Re:do what you can the best you can by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The best way to help the Iraqi's is to contribute whatever you can the best you can.

      It's not only WHAT you can contribute, but WHEN is the right time to contribute it.

      Everyone and their mother went out and gave blood right after 9/11... the lines to donate wrapped around the block. In the end, the Red Cross had to throw a huge amount of that blood out because there was no demand for it during the time when it was usable. Now we have shortages again.

  61. I know who to call... by tigertigr · · Score: 1

    We should get Junis over from Afghanistan to help them out. I hear he's a pro at getting the internet up and running on the crudest of devices.

  62. damn people! by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why is it that every other post is some self-righteous tirade about how Iraq has so many other problems right now that people shouldn't be concerned about things like this.

    Sure, they need food and safe water first, but there is a future in Iraq that people can think and talk about. There's already huge aid packages being put together.

    Iraq needs an economy in order to become self-sufficient. Things like this ARE going to be important. Let's try to make Iraq into a prosperous country.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:damn people! by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Why is it that every other post is some self-righteous tirade about how Iraq has so many other problems right now that people shouldn't be concerned about things like this.

      This is because humanitarian aid is the only thing that the self-righteous folks know. Strangely, no one these folks have ever helped has moved beyond the stage of requiring humanitarian aid, so there is no need for them to see beyond the perpetual cycle of dependency.

    2. Re:damn people! by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, they need food and safe water first, but there is a future in Iraq that people can think and talk about. There's already huge aid packages being put together.

      Sort of like driving your SUV to the WalMart to buy cheap shit made by sweated labor while talking on a cell phone to your therapist about the American Dream? Don't impose your cultural values on them. That is the worst kind of imperialism. But wait, we kicked their ass so they better buy in to the plan....

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    3. Re:damn people! by JoeBuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So how does turning over their national domain to a British IT consulting firm contribute to the rebuilding of Iraq?

  63. If you want to be a carpet bagger by litewoheat · · Score: 1

    I'm not too sure that Arabs, Persians, Kurds and Turkmens would like lots of western carpet baggers running around making barrels of money and taking it all out of thier country. That is what a bunch of geeks going to Iraq would basically be. There's pleantly of locals in the area that attended western schools that can do the job.

  64. Would love to by StarTux · · Score: 1

    As long as we can do a special DNS trick or proxy trick to Al-Jazeera :P

    StarTux

  65. Re:Presumptions by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Let the UN try to build out Iraqi Internet. Frankly I have no hope for the place and I'd rather we just get out.

    Excellent plan. That's what you did in Afghanistan (the first time, and probably this time too as they seem to have dropped off the media). Then you created a breeding ground for the Taleban and a home for bin Laden.

    They'll still have the 2nd (?) largest reserves of oil in the world, unless you steal it, and so be able to rearm in no time.

    Try to keep a longer attention span. You've destroyed two countries so far (Iran, Syria, North Korea in the queue). Now rebuild them, or be watching your backs forever after. Life is not a video game, it isn't "GAME OVER" when you take the presidential palace, it's just beginning.

  66. The US should rebuild Iraq by ErikJson · · Score: 1

    And hand them a big fat pile of money to start off from scratch again. No strings attached. Ok? That is the only thing that would be fair.

    1. Re:The US should rebuild Iraq by minaguib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure if you were being sarcastic or not. But, YES. The US acted on the will of its people through their represented officials. It is the people who drilled themselves into this dillema; they financed an unneeded war out of their own pockets causing an astounding debt to accumulate. Surely they would have anticipated that Iraq will need money once the war is over and have taken that into account! The responsibility for re-building Iraq to a state equal to, or better than it's previous state is the sole responsibility of the United States and it's allies that joined the war. Everyone who had nothing-to-do-with it has already absolved themselves of both the guilt associated with the unneeded deaths, the financial requirements of war, and responsibility of the betterment of that country's future. It's simple common sense and fairness.

    2. Re:The US should rebuild Iraq by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1
      The responsibility for re-building Iraq to a state equal to, or better than it's previous state is the sole responsibility of the United States and it's allies that joined the war.

      As somewho supported the war I agree. The US and its allies should have to rebuild, no one else should be allowed to do anything but humanaterian effort. No big oil contracts for the french or russians, No UN installed governments. This is the US's mess it should be their job to clean it up. If the iraqis want to do business with the french or russians they can, AFTER the rebuilding process is over, and only if the iraqis want back them in.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
    3. Re:The US should rebuild Iraq by cranos · · Score: 1

      And we've seen how well American Nation Building has been lately haven't we, how's Afghanistan doing at the moment, gotten rid of those pesky war lords yet?

      I agree with the premise of "You broke it you pay for it" however I don't agree with the idea that America should run Iraq. Let the UN do the job funded by the people who insisted on invading. Oh and the oil contracts? They should go to the highest bidder, not discriminated on the basis of who's pissed off at who.

    4. Re:The US should rebuild Iraq by I_am_God_Here · · Score: 1

      Afgan is doing quite well they just got a $40 million Regency-Hyatt.

      Also if you want to stop the warlords ask the god damn pakis to help out instead of giving the Al-Queerda an easy way out.

      Lastly the UN really helped out in Rowanda when the genocides were going on in '94 and the UN said they would take care of it, they didn't.

      Also France and Russia did huge amounts of business with Saddam(not just oil but weapons, russian tanks, french air fighters... being sold as late as 2002!), thats why they should be locked out, and if the UN gets in there they would be the main two benefactors.

      Finally I never said the US should RUN Iraq just REBUILD it.

      --

      Capitalism: unequal distribution of wealth
      Socialism: equal distribution of poverty
  67. With the US domestic IT market... by lamber45 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking of taking my soon-to-be-printed CS diploma to Iraq and start an ISP or something. In fact, I even wrote e-mail to the Iraqi embassy a few weeks ago and asked how to get a Visa. Funny thing: they never answered me.

  68. I'm on the way! by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    I'm seriously looking into GOING THERE to work with setting them up on Linux before someone else goes in and f*cks them all up on winblows!
    There's a fortune to be made there and NOW is the time to get in on it!!

  69. Interested.. by wolf- · · Score: 1

    I would be interested in buying some *.iq address's from an Iraqi owned/based registrar.

    I am NOT interested in an auction.
    Nor in sending my money to a 3rd party.

    Ensure that the profits and control are in the hands of Iraqis, and I'm in.

    --
    ----- LoboSoft specializes in Digital Language Lab
  70. I agree.. Food First... by caldroun · · Score: 1

    However I would like to register high.iq

    --
    "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
  71. Before commenting on Iraq read this.... by Joey7F · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have seen too many people making references to Iraq by appending other country's values to it. So read this from the CIA

    http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ iz.html

    It has information like literacy rates, religions, etc. I was surprised by a few things, for example, I thought all Iraqis were Arabs, but it turns out there are a fair amount of Turks, Assyrians etc.

    I hope they can become a shining example of democracy in a region that is dominated by dictators.

    After all, Italy, Germany and Japan have it pretty well now!

    --Joey

    1. Re:Before commenting on Iraq read this.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      I have seen too many people making references to Iraq by appending other country's values to it. ...

      After all, Italy, Germany and Japan have it pretty well now!


      Since they are all ethnically homogeneous nations they are similar to Iraq? Huh? I don't understand what you are saying. You are comparing mutually exclusive situations. You should be MORE worried that Iraq will dissolve into a factional mess, than whether or not the US can force "democracy" onto its people. The Kurds WILL NOT enter into some sort of half-assed ethnic federation with people who traditionally treat them as chattel. The Turks haven't had their say yet and who knows what Iran will do to stir up the Shias in the south. Notice the choice of the Brits to occupy that area. They are in for a jackpot, but luckily they are used to occupying land and playing religious sentinments of one group off another.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    2. Re:Before commenting on Iraq read this.... by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      After all, Italy, Germany and Japan have it pretty well now!

      Why, I bet if you were to ask anyone in Japan, they would say that having had nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nakasaki were the best things that could have happened to them!

      And Dresden? It is much nicer since the fire-bombing.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    3. Re:Before commenting on Iraq read this.... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Informative
      If they don't have Net access, they will continue to get their news from the likes of al-jazeera and Baghdad Bob.

      You do know that Al-Jazeera are not an Iraqi news service? And that Saddam had their reporters expelled from the country shortly after the war began, because of what they were reporting about the Iraqi regime?

      You see, they were only showing the truth, what war looks like from the ground. Very different to the sanitized news we receive, but if you believe in freedom and democracy, then you have to agree that having all sides of the story available is essential.

  72. Re:Presumptions by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    ...and probably this time too as they seem to have dropped off the media...

    Bzzzt. Wrong. The fact that whatever media you are paying attention to is too inadequate to prevent this misunderstanding on your part tells me a great deal right off the bat.

    Try to keep a longer attention span

    I am. Here's my long term plan; every now and then we invade, wipe out whatever troublemaker regime has managed to evolve and then leave. Again. Has this not been the normal state of affairs throughout Iraqi history? Who are we to presume to change this?

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  73. Geeks take charge! by Gannoc · · Score: 1
    While I have no use for an IQ domain, the article does make me wonder: Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?"

    Maybe you might want to send them the actual cash rather than buy an extra domain name.

    C'mon. Next you'll be suggesting that we buy big cars that get 15 mi/gallon so stimulate Iraq's economy

  74. Geeks Without Borders? I'd go. by Gray · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just last night I was listening to the shopping list of problems at Baghdad hospitals right now and thought to myself "well, I'm no help with that, but if they've got IT problems, I'd go help."

    I realize there are far bigger issues in the conflict, and the world; but as another poster said, I'm a lot better at fixing technology then at fixing people or giving away food.

    I'm not sure if there really is a requirement for an IT Peace Corp, but it's a nice idea. Post-war nerd squad to setup communications infrastructure. Internet, TV, radio, cell phones, we can do all that stuff.

    Geeks Without Borders. Attractive idea.

    1. Re:Geeks Without Borders? I'd go. by Ben+Fitzgerald · · Score: 1



      If you're seriously up for going over, please do get in touch, as we could use some feet on the ground.

      We should be able to equip you with a with a satelite phone and GPS, and arrange military transport, but you'd have to by willing to accept the risk of what is still an extremely volatile and damagerous environment.

      Many thanks for your support.

      Ben

    2. Re:Geeks Without Borders? I'd go. by Gray · · Score: 1

      True. Why is it that the bad guys always get the best uniforms?

    3. Re:Geeks Without Borders? I'd go. by Gray · · Score: 1

      Ben, pleaes e-mail me. gray at lowpass dot net.
      I would very much like to explore your proposal.

  75. We should respect their ancient heritage by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Democracy? Internet? These are not the traditional ways of the Iraqi people. Let's restore Baghdad to the grandeur it has as capital of the Arab Empire, and visit it as a theme park. Best of both worlds: they get their traditions restored, and we get another Disneyland.

    But seriously, we won the war largely because of strategies enabled by our information systems. The advantage of good information systems also applies to economic opportunities, not just military. And to rebuild a simple oil economy is a recipe for disaster just as soon as oil runs short or new technologies greatly lessen the use of it.

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  76. No! by Malc · · Score: 1

    This really is a social issue. That makes it the last thing you want geeks involved with. They'll almost be as bad as one of those military types.

  77. mensans rejoice by crowdozer · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good idea. Mensa would be all over www.high.iq

  78. I can think of two by AssFace · · Score: 1

    "EyeL.iq" (I like you... seriously, I do)

    and "retarded.iq"

    I might actually want the second one.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  79. Re:Best URL for this idea by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... in an area where children die from drinking water from the local river. Get the "life support" infrastructure back to "up and running" state, then think about getting the internet up.

    Because, you know, the most efficient way for water engineers, doctors, and all the other people who make "life support" infrastructure work involves communication via messengers in jeeps. Get real! There are massive challenges facing the people trying to rebuild that infrastructure, and they're going to need access to information and expertise from outside of their local area. Setting up an improved telecommunications infrastructure could help get those water treatment plants, hospitals, etc up and running again faster than would otherwise be possible.

    --
    0 1 - just my two bits
  80. Maybe...but by greymond · · Score: 1

    That would be the LAST thing on my list of what needs to be done/rebuilt in Iraq. Lets start by 1) Start taking care of the refugees and rebuilding new housing 2) Organizing the new government and placing leaders in areas 3) Creating a defense system for the new government so a new dictator doesn't just come back 4) Figure out who runs the Oil - Once all these are done then we can worry about luxuries like the internet, television, etc...

  81. This just in... by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the office of Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf (aka Baghdad Bob):

    "Republican guards have secured in Iraqi Internet services!"

    More at 11.

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

  82. stumbling blocks ... by Combuchan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think before CITRI plants their flag in Baghdad, they might want to consider the fact that somebody already owns the .iq root server.

    From linked page:

    Sponsoring Organization:

    Alani Corp.
    c/o InfoCom
    630 International Parkway
    Richardson, Texas 75081
    United States

    I'll pass up expected comment about Texans owning a chunk of Iraq... </troll>

    --
    "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
  83. Re:Presumptions by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    Bzzzt. Wrong. The fact that whatever media you are paying attention to is too inadequate to prevent this misunderstanding on your part tells me a great deal right off the bat.

    Perhaps I should have specified the popular media. But even on the BBC, you're lucky to hear one Afghan story a day.

    I am. Here's my long term plan; every now and then we invade, wipe out whatever troublemaker regime has managed to evolve and then leave.

    Go for it. Every twelve years elect a sockpuppet, invade, bankrupt your economy, knock a few points off global GDP, and create another million potential suicide bombers. Much more fun than the tedious work of building up a real democracy, as worked tolerably well in Germany and Japan after WWII.

    In any case, the backroom boys' plan is to have a long term base in Iraq where you can base troops and bombers to project power throughout the Middle East. They know that Saudi Arabia is the real problem, (that's where Osama and his buddies come from, after all), and that would be an excellent way to keep them in line. Maybe you should just gas all the Iraqis and blame Saddam for that to prevent any interference.

  84. Yeah.. by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    The fall of Sadam-net?

  85. Re:HAHAHA 0WN3D, B3330000TCH35!! by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That has been the case since the fall of the Soviet Union and will be true for at least another decade, when China gets its legs.

    The point being, now everyone knows it. The gloves are off and the neo-cons will strike while the iron is hot. On the one hand, the U.S. denies that it intends to hit Syria and Iran next and on the other hand they're already setting up to do exactly that.

    --
    Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
  86. Re:Send Money?? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1

    Actually I agree, but I dont think the UN should set foot in Iraq if we are footing the bill both in dollars and blood to free Iraq

    --
  87. I don't see a correlation by mdielmann · · Score: 1

    How does having an internet infrastructure improve the odds of freedom of information? China has quite the infastructure, judging by all the spammers, yet they don't have freedom of information. Also, the US had freedom of information (to one degree or other) before computers, although they didn't have as much knowledge.

    --
    Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    1. Re:I don't see a correlation by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How does having an internet infrastructure improve the odds of freedom of information?
      Well with truly unhindered access to the Internet one can see many points of view outside of one argument. For instance, an Iraqi citizen can read foreign newspapers and Al Jazeera and decide for themself what is "true" about the US occupation and decide for themself where they stand.

      The Gutenberg press had the same affect by allowing anyone to print media for a low cost, helping the spread of information. Gutenberg's process, which permitted the inexpensive dissemination of ideas and knowledge, paved the way for dramatic cultural and social change in Europe, including the Protestant Reformation.

      Although information one gathers might be _garbage_ I don't think one could argue that MORE information on a particular subject is a bad thing and I would argue that it does help citizens become more informed on what is going on in the world around them.

      Also, the US had freedom of information (to one degree or other) before computers, although they didn't have as much knowledge.
      And the US is considered a free country. What is your point? Wouldn't you agree that the Internet has helped US citizens stay aware of it's government's actions and also aware of the world around them? People can spread their words over the Internet with very little cost. Anyone in the US can walk into an Internet cafe and post a free web page spouting "truth" until they can no longer type. And that has changed the world. US citizens are more aware of it's government and the world at large because of the Internet. They are no longer restricted to the traditional media as a source of information.

      When information is truly free governments and others in power will no longer be able to hide behind lies and deceit. Why do you think those in power try so hard to stop the free flow of information? Because again, knowledge is power.

    2. Re:I don't see a correlation by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      The point is, the internet is a tool, nothing more, nothing less. It is not a guarantor of free information, nor does it's existence in a country equate to unfettered access. Hence, it has no correlation with freedom of information. OTOH, it does have the potential to provide more data and allow it's users to make their own informed opinions, but only if it is free and unfettered, in which case you already have freedom...

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  88. hmmm by Sho0tyz · · Score: 1

    I can almost picture the meeting between Bush and Blair. "We get the oil, you can have the domain names!"

  89. Highest Iraqi internet priority: by infolib · · Score: 1

    - find the guy behind Dear Raed and get him back online. (And find out if the story's true)
    After that we can talk email access for Baghdadis trying to contact relatives abroad.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  90. W's domain? by feed_those_kitties · · Score: 1, Funny
    Mabye President Bush wants to get www.zero.iq...

    !Sig

  91. Priorities by 90XDoubleSide · · Score: 5, Informative
    Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?

    Absolutely, but not before giving at least a small contribution to the World Food Programme, which is in desperate need of funds to combat starvation in both Iraq and sub-Saharan Africa at the same time. Then there will be enough people alive to use the internet!

    --
    "Reality is just a convenient measure of complexity" -Alvy Ray Smith
  92. They ARE self-sufficient by melted · · Score: 1

    Just stick a pipe into the ground and pump the oil. They'd live like kings if it wasn't for embargo imposed on them by the rest of the world. I'm not saying the embargo wasn't necessary, it was, but it would be stupid to think that they're poor. Second largest oil reserves in the world - that's a lot of dough sitting under them.

    1. Re:They ARE self-sufficient by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Funny
      Just stick a pipe into the ground and pump the oil. They'd live like kings if it wasn't for embargo imposed on them by the rest of the world. I'm not saying the embargo wasn't necessary, it was, but it would be stupid to think that they're poor. Second largest oil reserves in the world - that's a lot of dough sitting under them.

      Correction: They'd have lived like kings if it wasn't for the asshat who stole the money and built 12 palaces while his people starved. Now that he is gone the PEOPLE of Iraq can reap the rewards of that beautiful black gold by selling it to their liberators (at a modest profit and less than the OPEC per-barrel price of course.. we DID risk our asses of there remember).

    2. Re:They ARE self-sufficient by spun · · Score: 1

      The original justification for this was to protect our own asses from Saddam's nasty weapons of mass destruction. Now you are claiming that because we liberated them, the Iraqis should pay us? That's certainly ironic.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:They ARE self-sufficient by vjzuylen · · Score: 1

      Good point. And if the new, democratically-elected Iraqi government votes to raise the per-barrel prices to OPEC levels, the CIA can simply overthrow it and put another dictator in charge, just like they did with Iran!

      (Of course, the US will probably build safeguards into the Iraqi voting system to ensure that it will never come that far. The last thing they want is another Turkey, voting against US troop placement even in the face of losing substantial financial aid.)

      Long live the free people of the new, democratic Iraq!

      --

      Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
  93. Do WHATEVER we can to help by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    Iraq's people have just emerged from a 25+ year unjust prison sentence.

    We were willing to inflict upon them the horrors of war, in an effort to win them a better life. Anyone who hesitates to give whatever they can to help them win through to happiness is either a hypocrite, a coward, or simply a scoundrel.

    No disrespect to the soldiers risking their lives, but the hard work for everyone ELSE begins NOW.

    --
    -Styopa
    1. Re:Do WHATEVER we can to help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Iraq's people have just emerged from a 25+ year unjust prison sentence.

      actually many people where released from years of unjust prison sentences back in October of 2002. Saddam granted amnesty to all Iraqi prisoners including political prisoners. Read the full story.

      Iraq amnesty scorned by US

  94. Happy to help by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    I will help them by giving them a free domain: www.i-have-no.iq I wonder if someone whould want it...

  95. in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    the bush administration secretly bought a few .iq domain names:

    weaponsofmassdestruction.iq
    chemicalweapons.iq
    nuclearweapons.iq

    official cited the domain names as clear evidence of banned Iraqi weapons program. Mr Bush was overheard saying "I told you so." It was unclear as to whether Mr. Bush was commenting on the Iraqi weapons domain names or a domain name registered by Mr. Bush: my.iq

  96. What Iraqi internet infrastructure? by eglamkowski · · Score: 1

    From the CIA World Factbook:

    Population:
    24,001,816 (July 2002 est.)

    Internet users:
    12,500 (2001)

    Internet Service Providers (ISPs):
    1 (2000)

    --
    Government IS the problem.
    1. Re:What Iraqi internet infrastructure? by algebraist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In his weekly spiel, Bob Cringely commented on the Compaq computers that were being removed from government buildings, wondering in comment where they came from since apparently Iraq had none in 1991 and they were supposed to be under an embargo.

      I don't know if those facts are right, but Cringely usually checks things out.

      --
      Jan Theodore Galkowski, (Oo) http://www.smalltalkidiom.net/ MySQL,PHP,ETL,SQL,MinGW C, and plucking the Web
  97. Yes... by ryanvm · · Score: 1

    Yes - let's squat on all the .iq domains. That should help them immensely.

  98. The war is to blame? by Hygelac · · Score: 1

    The war has not left the Iraqi internet infrastructure in shambles. It was in shambles before we got there.

    --
    -- Grow up and use mutt.
  99. doomed by ralphclark · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This embarrassing project is doomed to fail for two very obvious reasons:

    1) Very few (non-Iraqi) people or organizations will want a domain name visibly associated with an ignoble war, death and destruction, and a long-term dictatorship.

    2) Very few people (and I include the members of Mensa which are mentioned as an example in CITRI's web page) will want a domain name that broadcasts how proud they are of their ability to pass standard intelligence tests. You see it's just not cool to be clever. Not that way, anyway.

    I suspect the only takers - at a knock-down price - will be the tasteless owners of shoddy porn, gambling and con-merchant websites. And spammers great and small.

  100. Duck Dodgers by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1


    I guess we could register drhi.iq for the Secretary of the Stratosphere!

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  101. This is morally reprehensible. by Dagmar+d'Surreal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is absolutely disgusting. These people are clearly taking advantage of someone else's (Iraq's) misfortune to try and make a buck. This group does not already control the .iq domain, but they know that if they can steal it, it'll be like having a licence to print money. Absolutely nothing is being said on their website about how much of this money they're collecting would actually be going to Iraq, and frankly, I suspect that "paying big salaries at Citri" will somehow also be considered to be an important part of the general welfare of Iraq's IT infrastructure.

    Let's see, there's also the small matter of it's not necessarily the desire of the Iraqi people that their domain space be sold off to people outside Iraq. For all we know, they could want a more conservative approach to be taken with it, and have it only be allowed for use by companies and organizations that reside within Iraq.

    From their web page:

    "The auction is set to continue over an intense two month period, after which funds will be called upon from the winners of each bid, and registrations formalised."

    Translation:
    s/auction/looting/;

    "In the case that a registration is not successful, no funds will be charged, unless the individual wishes to make a donation to the fund."

    Translation:
    "If the piles of money offered for domains doesn't change the minds of the people in the IANA and get us Iraq's domain, then you won't be out a penny."

  102. How convenient! by xutopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this some company owned and operated by some of Blair's "close" friends?

    This just goes to show that the politicians just wanted to profit in as many ways as possible from this supposed war of liberation.

  103. Rebuild their internet infrastructure and.. by subzero_ice · · Score: 1

    Help them rebuild their infrastructure that is also part of a strategy because that way it will be easier to spy on their networks and if they try blocking something then cry about freedom of speech. That is one thing people in US are specially concerned about and when it comes to accepting the hardly realities of life they are the first to back out and they don't know what the fuck freedom of speech is.

  104. As long as they don't give out... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

    bush.iq

    Such a paradox could destroy the fabric of cyberspace as we know it...

    1. Re:As long as they don't give out... by presearch · · Score: 1

      ..cuz it would be 0.0.0.0?

  105. People should always help folks by OldHawk777 · · Score: 1

    All people should help folks. All good people will help humanity.

    To punish others for the evil done by another individual shows a lack of intelligence, ethics, and humanity. Expressing humanity by helping other people proves we are mentally and emotionally healthy, and civilized.

    Also, for france, germany, russia, vatican, and china and US when you know that humans are suffering under extreme oppression/depravation and you do nothing then evil is being expressed.

    HAVE FUN

    OldHawk777

    Reality is a self-induced hallucination.

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  106. First thing that comes to mind... by xaoslaad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that the Iraqi people need a lot of other things before they need the internet. Why don't we start from the ground up. CLEAN WATER, FOOD, WORKING HOSPITALS, HOMES, FUNCTIONAL GOVERNMENT, AN ECONOMY, POWER, EDUCATION.... and then when we get everything they need to live and take care of themselves, let the Iraqi's, with the help of the rest of the world if they want, build THEIR corner of the internet.

    1. Re:First thing that comes to mind... by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      Funny... they had all that. We could have just left them alone and saved a lot of money.

      Other than that. do the original story's comment: why don't we let Iraqi companies make money by selling domain names ending with .iq?
      I mean, seriously, haven't the British made enough money from Iraq in the previous three invasions they (the Brits) staged? They even made the Iraqis PAY for two of them via taxes.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    2. Re:First thing that comes to mind... by billstewart · · Score: 1
      While that's true, communications is a critical part of building an economy, making hospitals work, and making governments function. The Internet is fairly appropriate technology for parts of this job, though other things like cell phones are also important. International trade is another important activity where the Internet will help, such as facilitiating selling oil, which will be their main revenue source until more of the economy evolves again.

      Some of these problems weren't just caused by the recent bombing - the 1990-1991 bombing destroyed Iraq's water system, and the US/UK trade embargo against Iraq specifically kept out repair parts for water purification equipment over the next decade, which was a major contributor to the estimated 1.5 million war-related deaths in that period.

      --

      Bill Stewart
      New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  107. I've noticed that a lot of internet servers are... by Peterus7 · · Score: 1

    down, all over the place, from small individual sites to big mega sites (especially hotmail and things like that), and even medium sized gaming sites. Does this have something to do with Iraq, or at least a hacker attack against the US from some peeved hackers? Does anyone else have this problem?

  108. By all means fix internet by praedor · · Score: 1

    Afterall, it is so much more important than giving the innocent civilians hurt in the multitude of crossfires (regardless of whether or not it is because Saddam and buddies planted their weapons in civil neighborhoods or not). The internet clearly should sit at the top of the list of things to fix. The best way to make the Iraqi's friends is to give them DSL, etc. Then, that teenager who got both his legs blown off while he and his father sat down for breakfast (due to an errant bomb) can forget that his Dad is dead and he no longer has legs can browse ebay and download mp3s. There, all better.

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  109. What confuses me by phorm · · Score: 1

    Is how anyone can sell off a country's domain to a non-entity in that country. In Canada, at least, I believe that you must have a legitimate business presence in this country in order to have a .ca domain? I could be wrong, but this is what I remember being said about localized domains.

  110. speaking of Iraqi internet, where's "dearraed?" by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    What happened to Salam Pax of http://dearraed.blogspot.com?

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  111. asshole by Ender+Ryan · · Score: 1
    You are implying a lot of things about me that are false. Fuck you.

    --
    Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken - Tyler Durden
    1. Re:asshole by metulj · · Score: 1

      Fuck you.
      Be careful what you ask for. He's a big old fag.

  112. Re:Should you take the lead by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    Dictatorships must be destroyed. (TM) (R) GWB et al.

    Really? Well that certainly is a refreshing change, given the USA's long history of propping up dictators such as Noreiga when it is in their interest to do so, or even removing a democratically elected government in Chile and installing the dictator Pinoche. Oh didn't you know that? Wake up and stop parroting. I look forward to the USA removing Robert Mugabe from power in Zimbabwe, and then I look forward to the nuclear war you will have with North Korea and Mainland China, during which you will hopefully be obliterated.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  113. Iraq public to get access the internet? by Richy_T · · Score: 1
    Methinks we're sure gonna be learning the Iraqi words for "me too".


    Will September never end?


    Rich

  114. Excellent point by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    Good questions! No one seems to consider the possibility that entire population of human beings could be into a form of national BDSM or D/s where they enjoy the brutal, criminal oppression from a power hungry tyrant vs. a democraticly based government that allows the people a peaceful form of self-determining government.

    Clearly it is the outdated old fuddy duddy hyperconservative morals of the west that assumes people around the world want to be free. Next time instead of being so arrogant we Westerners should REALLY take the time out to listen to the state sponsored media that conveys to us the will of the totalitarian governements...uh....I mean the "people" of the countries we're trying to reform.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Excellent point by broter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No one seems to consider the possibility that entire population of human beings could be into a form of national BDSM or D/s where they enjoy the brutal, criminal oppression from a power hungry tyrant...

      Sarcasm aside, there supposedly is a rather significant portion of the Shia population (either in Iraq or Saudi or both) that wants a Caliphant and not a democracy. So, yes, some people don't want a democracy as we have it.

      I think a more valid, but difficult, question is do we believe in the UN charter that says people have a right to self governance implies only democracy in the world or does it suggest that a population can choose to support a different kind of government?

      This is an actual question. We in the US have been brought up to be part of a democratic republic. It was certainly better than what we had before, and it's certainly better than most of the post colonial governments on earth. I certain don't want another. But is it the only valid form of government?

      --
      "One man can change the world with a bullet in the right place."
      - Mick Travis, "If..."
  115. Let the raping begin! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Seriously though, why on earth should .iq get to be handled by a British ISP. I'm sure there are plenty of people in Iraq capable of running a name service. This British firm taking a resource from Iraq (it's TLD) in order to 'help' it (and skim a little off the top) is terrible, especially that money from Iraqis wanting a domain in their own country will have their money leave and then only have a part of it come back, and for what? Running a few name servers?

    I'm sure this is only a small part of what's going to happen to Iraq's resources (namely, oil), and it's very disappointing.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  116. Information Minister quotes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This site may be overloaded, but is has good quotes:
    http://www.welovetheiraqiinformationminis ter.com/

    Like:

    "Iraq will not be defeated. Iraq has now already achieved victory - apart from some technicalities."

    "There are no American infidels in Baghdad. Never!"

    "My feelings - as usual - we will slaughter them all"

    "Our initial assessment is that they will all die"

    "I blame Al-Jazeera - they are marketing for the Americans!"

    "God will roast their stomachs in hell at the hands of Iraqis."

    "surrender or be burned in their tanks."

    "No I am not scared and neither should you be!"

    "They're not even [within] 100 miles [of Baghdad]. They are not in any
    place. They hold no place in Iraq. This is an illusion ... they are
    trying to sell to the others an illusion."

  117. power != knowledge by why-is-it · · Score: 1

    the people of Iraq and the rest of the world have stated clearly that the Iraqi people WILL be in charge of this democracy regardless of the current US administration's agenda.

    Well, GWB has said that he wants there to be stability and democracy in Iraq. The government of Saddam Hussein was extremely stable. There were no riots in the streets, crime was not running rampant, and the few public services (electricty, water) worked as well as could be expected, given Iraq's status as a third-world nation.

    Democracy is another matter altogether. How do you suppose the US would respond if the people of Iraq gave GWB the middle finger and freely re-elected the Baath party lead by a relative of Saddam? Or what if they freely elected a militant Islamic government. Would the democratic will of the Iraqi people be respected?

    Not a chance...

    --
    *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
    1. Re:power != knowledge by e2d2 · · Score: 1

      There is no guarantee against disagreement or even war between two countries just because they are both democratic. But I doubt the US could forcefully remove a truly elected leader of another country without the world stepping in to stop them. I fear a world without those kinds of checks and balances. Just because one is elected doesn't mean they are not prone to error or just plain out deciet. Hell even Hitler was elected into office.

    2. Re:power != knowledge by why-is-it · · Score: 1

      But I doubt the US could forcefully remove a truly elected leader of another country without the world stepping in to stop them.

      I would like to agree with you, unfortunately I don't see that happening. The US is our Rome, and we have Pax Americana for the forseeable future. There will always be at least a couple of nations looking to join the next "coalition of the willing" out of economic self-interest. (c.f John Howard in Australia) rather than any higher moral principles.

      It would be preferable if GWB would just plainly state that he is going to organize the world as he sees fit, and the only guiding principle will be to do what is in the US' best interests. Then other nations could have a serious discussion about what the appropriate response is. Do you sacrifice sovereignty and independance for better access to US markets? What is in the best interests of your citizens in such cases? Can the combined moral arguments of other nations make a difference? Can multilateralism be resurrected?

      Unfortunately, I think the war on terror will be a convenient disguise to mask and pre-empt any serious discussion and rhetoric will prevail.

      I fear a world without those kinds of checks and balances. Just because one is elected doesn't mean they are not prone to error or just plain out deciet.

      A lesson GWB and his hawks would be wise to learn. The US administration seems to have lost all interest in Afghanistan and the Taliban are starting to exert their influence again (aided by Pakistan.) I hope the US administration's attention span with respect to Iraq is not so short.

      --
      *** Where are we going? And what's with this handbasket?
  118. Re:HAHAHA 0WN3D, B3330000TCH35!! by spun · · Score: 1

    Yes, you see, trusting populace, the reason that no weapons of mass destruction have been found is clear: they have all been moved to Syria.

    Can you say "Lather, Rinse, Repeat?"

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  119. Where is Raed? by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if this guy is ok? - I think he's got a bit of a following since running that site....... but no updates in a while :(

    Hope he's not got a bomb in his ass.....

    http://dear_raed.blogspot.com/

  120. On behalf of CITRI - some facts etc. by Ben+Fitzgerald · · Score: 1

    Thanks to everyone for there support for the CITRI project.

    Given the massive number of postings of comments and replies, I feel I should set a few things straight.

    1) CITRI is a non profit organisation - and by that we mean charitable - there will be no 'skimming' or 'fat salaries' taken out of raised funds. We intend that as much of the money raised as possible should go towards the implementation of information infrastructure in Iraq. We are asking people and companies to support us with their own resources, as has been done by Onega & others so far. If there is any payback, it is in the knowledge that we are working for the good of humanity. If and when we need to hire full time staff on the ground (In Iraq), they will be paid a reasonable local salary. Onega has stated publically that they will not take a penny / dime from the project, and accounting will be completely open book.

    2) Some people have questioned our calculations and projections of revenue. They are based upon financial models, but one key thing to bear in mind is that traditionally registrars have charged a flat fee for each domain. So that when initially registered, sports.com is charged the same as asdrgneofrnvg.com, although the former is considered more desirable. Vast sums of money have passed hands on domains after initial registration - we believe that by conducting an open auction at the point of initial registration, this premium goes where it should - into CITRI projects. Whether the amount raised is higher or lower than target, it would all make a difference.

    3) We completely agree with all the comments about food coming first. This is what the Red Cross / US / UK / UN are doing right now, and will continue to do. CITRI is a longer term plan to help the development of the country through the use of IT.

    4) Registrations & the auction process are not open yet (and are not guaranteed ever at this early point)- we are currently talking to IANA / the current controller of the dead .IQ domain about redelegation. This process can take a number of months, and may not be to ourselves (Uncle Sam may already have a plan - if it is better than ours, then we would back this). We have so far received a great deal of goodwill, and thank everyone for it, but we can not take pre registrations / bids at this time.

    5) CITRI is all about partners. We have big partners, from IT firms and others, who will help with the hosting, infrastructure, the domain auction etc. If you have any time or resources to offer, and are willing to do it for the PR alone / absolute cost (remember funds to the projects), please do send us an email, or get in touch. We are particularly keen in making contact with technically literate Iraqi's who intend to head back soon.

    Our sincere thanks to everyone for their support and comments.

    Ben

  121. Re:Should you take the lead by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    Please stop your selective use of history to back up your ignorance. The FACT is that the USA has supported dictatorships in the past but it has also oppossed them. Ever hear of Castro, Mussolini?

    Yeah. The point is, assuming you are the same coward as the other coward, that this "dictatorships must be destroyed, period" rhetoric is bilgewater. The USA attacked and invaded a particular dictaorship for particular ends that didn't have that much to do with the fact of dictatorship. It's a smokescreen.

    As far as looking forward towards nuclear war

    The point I was making, in between the dubious pleasure of flaming the uncomprehending, is that if you are now suddenly in the business of being global cop and removing dictatorships (tm), go right ahead. After fixing those nasty problems in Africa that you'ver never given a shit about (wrong colour, no oil or something), you will run into serious nuclear trouble in Asia. It's not a teneable worldview.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  122. Iraqi internet will help us too. by Vegan+Pagan · · Score: 1

    Read Salam Pax's Weblog. It's apparently a weblog from a man living in Baghdad, who wrote, in English, about his life in the months leading up to this war. It's full of details that makes Baghdad feel much more human than the prison city our media portrays it as. However it still is not biased, and is equally skeptical of Saddam and Bush. Since few Americans can get Al Jazeera, which is still biased in its own way, this weblog may be the closest Americans can get to a true insider's view of Iraq. One insider, anyway. His last post was on March 24, hopefully because his ISP went out, rather than because of anything happening to him. The sooner Baghdad gets back its internet access, the sooner we'll hear more first person accounts unfitered by any media interest.

  123. Carpet Bagging by ttimes · · Score: 1

    We should have never been there in the first place. Any corporate intrusion from UK or USA will reek of carpet bagging. Help the Iraquis decide what they want- don't force more upon them.

  124. Re:Mensa.IQ ... et al. by jot445 · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, beautiful irony! I complain about the moderation of my post, then my complaint is marked as TROLL-1. Sweet. Meanwhile, the post that called me a "cock gobbler" remains unmoderated. Nice work, there, moderators! Soon another Slashdot fan and active reader will be moderated down into oblivion.

    --
    The preceding comment has been reviewed and declared to be compliant with HIPPA Phase II regulations.
  125. Re:Presumptions by vjzuylen · · Score: 1
    Maybe you should just gas all the Iraqis and blame Saddam for that to prevent any interference.

    That would certainly help Mr. Bush in convincing the rest of the world of the legitimacy of this war.

    --

    Hee-hee. Dying tickles!
  126. Re:Presumptions by Tailhook · · Score: 1

    "Much more fun than the tedious work of building up a real democracy, as worked tolerably well in Germany and Japan after WWII."

    While you deserve credit for acknowledging allied successes in Japan and Germany, your analogy has fundamental holes. In the case of Japan we attacked not only the Japanese military, but also their population and religious icon, the Emperor. We pulled their heads out of the theocratic sand and watched as the light slowly dawned. In the case of Germany, their living god killed himself, after we bombed the crap out of the population.

    In Iraq, we chose to spare both the population and the theocracy. There is no hope for these people.

    --
    Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  127. Keep this in mind by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

    When you go to iraq to repair the infastructure, remember this flyer:
    You've got a tough job ahead of you

    Before I saw this, I never considered Iraq's fiber infastructure. This really could account for all those bombing missions.

    --
    Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
    Jack: "Who doesn't??"
  128. Formmail Scans from the War Zone by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 1
    Offtopic, but...

    Until this whole thing started, Kuwait was one of many small countries that I'd never seen a formmail scan from. (Most come from .cn, .ca, New York, and Texas ISPs.) But soon after the beginning of the war, scans started coming in from Kuwait of all places.

    I haven't heard of hactivists using formmail.pl to spread their message - so I doubt if they're behind these recent attacks. But scans coming from the Hard Rock Cafe in Kuwait City suggest that it might be allied forces or the press who are getting some extra money by spamming from the War Zone.

  129. Infrastructure will be put in first by serutan · · Score: 1

    Probably along the lines of this and this .

    Thank you, please pull forward to the second window.

  130. MENSA first in line by Jayman2 · · Score: 1

    Well MENSA should be some of the first to buy domains in iraq with the .IQ they have :-)

    --
    -.sig sauer-
  131. Re:Should you take the lead by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

    So the moral of this story is, don't invade the country next door if you don't want to wind up getting the stuffing knocked out of you.

    When elephants fight, it is the grass that suffers.

    I could blame ordinary American's for the actions of GWB, but I won't.

    You are conflating the Iraqi people with the Saddam Regime. The USA owes Saddam nothing except a bullet to the back of the head to finally finish what they started 1991. The USA owes the ordinary Iraqis a lot for all the bombs that have fallen on them, for the lack of hospital care etc that they, not Saddam and his cronies, suffered during the 1990s.

    You could at this stage start saying that the USA legally owes the USA citizens only and no one else. Well fine, but if you act as if your military might is the only important thing, don't be surprised if it's the only thing about your country that is respected.

    --

    My Karma: ran over your Dogma
    StrawberryFrog

  132. About that Al-Jazeera thingy... by danro · · Score: 1

    If they don't have Net access, they will continue to get their news from the likes of al-jazeera and Baghdad Bob.

    Both the Pentagon and the Baath party hated Al-Jazeera.
    They must have been doing something right.

    Never trust a news source that one of the partys in a conflict actually likes (CNN, Iraqi national TV etc.) that's a friggin' guarantee of severe bias.
    Not saying that you can trust Al-Jazeera, but them pissing off both sides is definitly a good sign.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  133. One Caveat by drpickett · · Score: 1

    Their new Internet infrastructure cannot have any equipment from Alcatel or Siemens - Nya nya nya

  134. The war is over.... by Moggie68 · · Score: 1

    ...and now the winners will loot the country for everything it's got. First a UK firm steals the domain. Next will be US oil companies snatching the oil fields. Iraqi people will never see more than 1 cent for ever dollar earned from selling Iraqi oil. Before the war Iraqis were poor, sick, hungry and oppressed. After the war they are poor, sick and hungry.

  135. HoaxNews.com by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    Freedom of information? You mean, freedom to watch FoxNews.com? How is it better than the Ba'ath Ministry of information, I'm still wondering ...

  136. Maybe the geeks of the world... by ronfar · · Score: 1
    Could go to Iraq and help clean up the civilian dead still rotting on the highways thanks to the US's glorious war of liberation?

    Something terrible happened on Highway 8

    --
    All the creatures will die, And all the things will be broken. That's the law of samurai. (Jubai, 1605)
  137. .iq domains by Foehg · · Score: 1

    I'm inclined to like aisle.iq. :-)

  138. Yes, geeks can help! by Damon+Campagna · · Score: 1
    Well, of course "we" should feed them first - and rebuild medical facilities, sanitation, police force, financial system, and everything else either disrupted by the war or perverted during the Ba'ath reign.

    But Anselm asks, "Should geeks around the world take the lead in getting Iraq back online?" Of course! That's the thing you and I, as programmers, administrators, designers, tech writers, etc., have to offer the situation.

    People in every profession have a particular skill or trait to bring to the table in situations like this. Rebuilding Iraq's information infrastructure is what /.'s can do. A simple, snappy answer like "we should feed them first," a) completely ingnores the poster's question and b) ignores what geeks really can do to make the world a better place - besides port "Doom" to microwave oven control panels and digital watches.

  139. Wouldn't it do a bunch more good... by anonymoushalibut · · Score: 1

    ...to be working to build out the information infrastructure in places like Syria, Lybia, North Korea et. al.? It seems we may be able to save a bunch of cash (well, and lives) sending over laptops and WAPs instead of bunkerbusters and MOABs... I'm not so naive as to think that fostering communication is a panacea for totalitarian rule, but it is certainly a powerful tool for bringing democratization. Iran, despite our current administration's rhetoric, has been a powerful example of this... While our threats have in effect bolstered the hardline mullahs' regressive tactics, there's a strong argument to be made for the student population's use of the net as informational and organizational tool in bringing about concessions over the past decade... Not to mention the fact that it serves as a pipeline for bringing western information and culture into these otherwise (to varying degrees) closed societies, the power of which, while certainly not as rapid, is easily as mighty as that of the 'coalition' forces...