Slashdot Mirror


Tax Tips For Small Folks?

An anonymous "The tax deadline is fast approaching (here in the USofA). Like some of you, I have a small business on the side. Since I haven't figured out the 'step 2' yet (the one before 'step 3: profit!!!'), my revenues were zero for all of last year, and the expenses were just about zero too. What is the quickest and least painful way for a person in my situation to do his taxes? I don't want to spend 100s of dollars going to a paid professional, just to have him put all zeroes in the form. If you have done your taxes and are a small business (C-corp, don't ask why...), do you have any tips?" This is also your chance to offer all the heretofore unsolicited tax advice you've been bottling up all year.

345 comments

  1. Why it's easy... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    my revenues were zero for all of last year, and the expenses were just about zero too.
    Forgive me for saying so but if your expenses and revenues were zero, then how do you have a business?
    I don't want to spend 100s of dollars going to a paid professional, just to have him put all zeroes in the form.
    Then put zeros in yourself.
    Advice? Get an actual business first, then come back and ask this question.

    Now if you're wanting tips on how to scam the IRS........

    1. Re:Why it's easy... by rayvd · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is this marked troll? It's a good point... if you have zero income, you don't really have to pay any taxes now do you? :)

      Zero expenses is besides the point, but at least we know you can't write anything off from your zero income.

      Weird!

    2. Re:Why it's easy... by sheemwaza · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's a good point... if you have zero income, you don't really have to pay any taxes now do you? :)

      Ummm.... Even if you make near zero dollars, you may want to file anyway. If you work and support children, it means you may be eligible for the earned income credit...I emphasize credit meaning the government gives you money! I worked in a a volunteer tax office for a while and a lady came in who hadn't filed for two years because she hadn't had a job. Turns out her husband's disability income counted for the EIC and she was able to claim >3K in tax credits for the two years (again, having children is a credit multiplier)... even though her income was negligible.

    3. Re:Why it's easy... by villain170 · · Score: 3, Funny

      government gives you money

      Whoa.. what a novel concept? How come you didn't include a link where I can sign up for this "free" money ????

      I don't know much about the tax system, but I do know many things in life aren't free. What's the catch here?

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    4. Re:Why it's easy... by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your income has to be low (extremely low if you don't have children), but you must have income from working. That really is about it. The Earned Income Tax Credit is really more of a welfare program than a part of the tax system; it just happens to be claimed on the same forms as other people use to pay taxes.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    5. Re:Why it's easy... by yasth · · Score: 1

      It is not really a welfare program in itself, but is supposed to further annother welfare program Social security. I.E. it is supposed to be a deferment on the payroll tax. It isn't that bad of an idea. The payroll tax can eat you alive if you are not earning a lot. EIC just softens the blow, and makes the *very* regresive payroll tax slightly less so.

      More info:
      http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p596.pdf

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    6. Re:Why it's easy... by k-0s · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      My advice is a bit different then the advice above. First open a tax haven in Bermuda, second profit away. I realize you are probably listing no profits specifically for tax reasons. Hell if Bush's friends in big business can do it you should be able to also. Although you may wind up being targeted by these folks.

    7. Re:Why it's easy... by AssFace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As deleriously easy and fantastic as that sounds, and also while that idea is semi-valid depending on what taxes you are looking to avoid or what your business is - it should be noted that Bermuda isn't the place to do that.

      I am moving to Bermuda next month, have family (in-law) there, I know people that own a variety of small and large corporations there, and I will be president of a company there upon moving.

      I assure you that unless your corporation is an insurance company or a reinsurance company, there isn't much tax haven to be had my "moving it there."
      (for starters, unless you are either of those types of companies, at this point for the most part, they won't let you move there)

      Bermuda has gotten a bad rap these days because of misinterpretation of Enron and Global Crossing going under and them having offices in Bermuda.
      There are close to 2000 companies that have offices in Bermuda and there are well over 100 entirely based there - but the only ones that would see it as a "tax haven" in any signifncant part are the insurance companies. If you are a multinational company, then having some offices in Bermuda that take in foreing revenues will save you some taxes - but unless you have a large amount of foreign revenue, it isn't going to help much incroprating there (not to mention that they very likely will not let you).

      When you say "tax haven" - what you really mean are the Camen Islands. There are *many* companies (esp hedge funds) that are based in Bermuda, but that is just for where they have employees - even they incorporate in the Camen Islands.

      So if you really want to avoid the taxes, you would want to incorporate in the Camens, have your employees based in Bermuda, and then somehow get citizenship outside of the states and lose your US citizenship... noting that with that you will lose all of the positive civil liberties and open doors that having US citizenship nearly automatically allows you when travelling in friendly countries.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    8. Re:Why it's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, for starters you can't even begin to answer this question until you know what kind of legal entity his business his. If it is just a sole proprietorship with no income and no expenses (I assume what the poster really means is that he has an idea, not a busines and just doesn't realize it) you can fill out a 1040 IRS form and if you did have expenses you would need to complete a "profit or loss from business form" and attach that to your return. In that case you would get the earned income credit. However if the business is of another type, say a S-Corporation, then you would still fill out a 1040 and get the earned income credit for your PERSONAL return. If you had an S-Corporation, then you would have the security of any liability being limited to the corporation but retain the benefit of being able use tax deductions from the business on your personal tax return.

    9. Re:Why it's easy... by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      One reason Bermuda is "nice" is that their laws on corporate governance favor management over shareholders much more strongly than American laws do. It's virtually impossible for a shareholder lawsuit to succeed against a Bermuda corporation.

      On the other hand, IANA corporate lawyer or tax attorney. BTW, it's the Cayman Islands.

    10. Re:Why it's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for like $20, turbotax on the web will let you take care of stuff. if this is all just "self-employed" you can do schedule C which turbotax does for you. you need to turn a profit w/in 3 yrs. an advantage here is you can deduct/amortize your assets (a portion of your computer, etc.), which amts to deductible costs. I've found accountants singularly unhelpful UNLESS you have an actual business. if you're just "pay me, I can do something for you" that's probably just schedule C self-employment, and turbotax is totally adequate. if you've made a corporation, you're pretty screwed and need an accountant. disclaimer: this is not my field. i just do my own Sch C via turbotax and have for years, but i can't verify that i'm doing it right and my advice is take-it-or-leave-it level.

    11. Re:Why it's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The catch is it used to be your money; mostly from taxes you pay at other times (e.g. sales tax)

    12. Re:Why it's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you read the topic, it says it's a C Corp.

    13. Re:Why it's easy... by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      As an expat moving to Berumda, I do hope you have a work permit lined up. Solicitation for work is illegal without a "right to seek employement" letter from Immigration, or in resonse to a published ad in the back of the Royal Gazette or Sun.

      As for taxes, I agree. Bermuda is mostly based on a use-tax, but there are some personal taxes too. Income tax in BDA is 12%, of which the company pays 8% and the employee 4%. There is also a mandatory pension plan all employees (bermudian and expats) must contribute too. Good news is when you leave the isles, you get it back.

      Also remember that Bermuda has tax treaties signed with Canada, the US, and UK. They also are very concerned about any action that the OECD considers "tax haven" status.

      Word of advice, don't use the word haven in Bermuda. That, and say "good morning/day/night" to everyone you run into. Else, you'll be considered rude.

      Enjoy Bermy, I spent 6+ years there, and due to the foreign income exemptions, your US tax burden should be close to zero (considering that housing will cost upwards of $1,800-$3,000/month for a decent 2 bedroom house).

    14. Re:Why it's easy... by AssFace · · Score: 1

      yes, I already have a job heading over there - head of a tech company.

      I won't be taxed by the US for anything up to $80K - anything over that I will then be taxed on.

      I'm aware of the cultural side of it - my fiancee is from Bermuda and I've been there a lot - her dad owns a few companies there and her mother is high up at one of (if not the) largest insurance companies based there.

      and yeah, our apartment is going to be $2050 - but that is actually not too bad - I live in Boston/Cambridge now and the prices are too different between the two.

      I'm looking forward to training year round there for triathlons.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    15. Re:Why it's easy... by AssFace · · Score: 1

      lol - thanks.
      I obviously can't spell :)

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    16. Re:Why it's easy... by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      Good luck on the job. What company are you joining? Having worked the IT and cosulting idustry in Bermy, I might be able to provide some info. Same holds true for the reinsurance biz. Glad to say you aren't going to work for the telephone company!

      If you want, drop a message at bermuda@cruxsecurity.com.....

    17. Re:Why it's easy... by AssFace · · Score: 1

      actually I originally was trying to get a job at the two top reinsurance companies, but then this other (better) opportunity came up (vaguely hedge fund related). In the process I got to learn a lot about the reinsurance industry.

      I'll send you an email about it - always good to hear about it from another angle.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    18. Re:Why it's easy... by AssFace · · Score: 1

      err, maybe I won't send you an email - "no such user"

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    19. Re:Why it's easy... by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      One must remember to run postmap after editing the virtual files.....

      updated....

    20. Re:Why it's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      probably an open sores company -- no revenue. And no expenses because he lives in his parents basement.


      I'm sure VA Linux can tell you how to lose money.


      your best bet is to register the company in an offshore country, like bermuda or the bahamas. You don't need to file any USA paperwork.

  2. Get an Accountant by inbox · · Score: 5, Informative

    My advice (and I, too, am the President of a very small C-Corp not quite yet generating a great deal of revenue) would have to be to get an accountant. There isn't just one form to put zeros on. There are a lot. And all kinds of other things. And penalties for messing it up.

    Skip the lawyers if you have to, but don't skip the accountant.

    1. Re:Get an Accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like another reason to simplify this tax mess. Personally, I would rather have easy taxes and give the money that would go to the accountant to the IRS. I do my own taxes each year and end up living in fear that I made an honest mistake and will end up with a bunch of big fines for it.

    2. Re:Get an Accountant by dr_dank · · Score: 3, Informative

      I work as an accountant for a large payroll firm and most of my job is to weed out clients that are not running payrolls and are getting free nil filing on our tax filing service, generating cost with no return. If you're using a payroll service, don't expect them to file for you if you are not active.

      The parent comments advice is probably the most important advice you'll get on this thread.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    3. Re:Get an Accountant by kerskine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Great idea - especially since you've missed the deadline for filing corporate taxes - March 31. You're going to need some professional advise at this point.

      --
      ****

      "I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
    4. Re:Get an Accountant by Spanky+Lovesalot · · Score: 1

      There are even more benefits to having an accountant than that. Do you sit around and learn about tax law regularly? I know I don't, but my account sure does. It's their job to learn all the nuances of keeping Uncle Sam from screwing you out of your money.

      Think of it like this: they're paid to sit around and think shit up to save you money. They can also provide you advice on how to arrange your business and finances to get even less screwed next year.

    5. Re:Get an Accountant by scrotch · · Score: 3, Informative

      I worked as an S-Corp for two years, and I whole-heartedly agree: get an accountant.

      The IRS will give you incorrect information. Their forms, and booklets, and other books (and tax software) on the market all assume that you know what you must declare and what you can write off. Can you write off paper clips? Can you write off your phone bill? Gasoline? Last year's taxes? They won't tell you. If you're not absolutely-bet-your-business-on-it positive, get an accountant. Mine charged about $200.00 to do my business and personal taxes. Some of the best money I've ever spent.

      I don't know why taxes have to be so freaking difficult, but they are. It's very hard to get correct, complete information, especially if your situation is at all unusual - like you made $0.00.

    6. Re:Get an Accountant by jhunsake · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They don't care for small incomes. I've filed for friends and a couple corporations with relatively small incomes many times late. They will send you a statement with penalties on it (which aren't that much given the small income), but if you send in what you would have owed had you filed on time, they will drop the rest off your account.

      Tip: Learn how to play the system. Don't let the big IRS beuracracy hurt you, make it help you.

    7. Re:Get an Accountant by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That, of course, would depend on what taxable year the corporation elected to have.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    8. Re:Get an Accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, there is just one form - 1020 for a C-Corp. If your revenues are almost zero and you don't have any assets to depreciate, that's about all you have to fill out. And it's really pretty simple. You might want to get your accountant to do it the first year just to show you how it's done, but no reason why you can't do it yourself after that

    9. Re:Get an Accountant by SpotBug · · Score: 0, Redundant

      March 15th

      --
      cygnuhchur
    10. Re:Get an Accountant by deanj · · Score: 1

      Ok....what's a good way to find an accountant? Just opening the phonebook at taking a random guess gives me the heebie jeebies....

    11. Re:Get an Accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, of course, are responding to the wrong message.

    12. Re:Get an Accountant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      depends on who the 'owners' are of the Small business are. if it's just him it isn't due till the 15th. It's a schedual C attached to a 1040 long.

    13. Re:Get an Accountant by polyiguana · · Score: 1

      OK...what's a good way to find an accountant? Just opening the phonebook at taking a random guess gives me the heebie jeebies....

      Ask people that you know who have complicated tax issues. For professional services, word of mouth is generally the best thing going. There are also accountant recommendation services at the chamber of commerce and other areas, which usually recommend their own members.

    14. Re:Get an Accountant by humblecoder · · Score: 2, Informative

      Schedule X is for SOLE PROPRIETORS (if you don't know what that is, then you really DO need professional tax advice). They are talking about filing taxes for a C Corporation.

    15. Re:Get an Accountant by T5 · · Score: 1

      As the president of a small C corp that is turning a small, under-the-tax-radar profit, the accountant's advice is worth much more than the cost. When it comes to getting the federal tax stuff right, with depreciation and all that jazz, plus getting the state return figured out properly, it's worth it to me for the several hundred dollars/year to not have to worry with the financial minutae.

    16. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      How about this interesting fellow who's researched
      the tax code for what its worth.

      A HREF="//http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/index. htm">cracking the irs tax code

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    17. Re:Get an Accountant by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone's assuming that he's incorporated. Running a small business on the side does not instantly mean that you've gone out and filed the paperwork to be a corporation, nor is it necessarily a given that you should. It just depends on how you want the tax laws applied to your business.

      If you havent't filed with your city or state to be a business, then they don't consider you a business; what you do is then considered a hobby. If you're making in excess of $600 from any single client, then you'd better think about registering to become a business, as you still have to declare the income and the IRS might raise an eyebrow at a hobby that earns several thousand dollars a year.

      Some of the benefits include being able to declare part of your home as an office, which gives you breaks on things like your utilities. Business trips taken with the car can also be included (but you have to know when you went and exactly what the mileage was, etc.) If you keep decent books on what you do and where you go, then you can really cancel out most of the effects of a "side business." As a computer animator, I get to declare all of my computer upgrades up to $18,000 a year as a business cost; now how sweet is that? :)

      Also, if you earn less than $600 on a business for more than a couple of years, the IRS literally considers it a hobby, not a business.

      Definitely give TurboTax for the Web a shot. It's not that expensive and can usually be completed in an hour or so, no matter how complicated your taxes (mine were six different forms last year, and everything went fine. Cost me $20 - it was that low because Oklahoma pays for the basic service for residents, and then I upgraded for "expert" advice.)

      Finally, check to see if your state tax commission cooperates with an accounting service to help pay for your tax advice. They want you to do it right as much as you do; any mistakes you make means more headaches and work for them.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    18. Re:Get an Accountant by jaoswald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In case you are in danger of believing in this nut case, consider this link from the IRS also.

    19. Re:Get an Accountant by bishmasterb · · Score: 1

      He did say he was a C-Corp, which is indeed a corporation. Deadline for filing was March 15th. BTW, if you do indeed have $0 revenue, close the corp and start a sole proprietorship or partnership which don't pay any corp taxes (taxes are paid by the partners on their personal tax returns); in California all corps have to pay $800 per year regardless of revenue (another reason not to be supporting a corp that no longer, or hasn't yet had, revenue).

    20. Re:Get an Accountant by will592 · · Score: 1

      Many years ago when my dad was first starting his business that is exactly what he did. Called a random accountant and paid him to generate his tax return. He then took the paperwork and went to another accountant and asked him to do the same. He also told him that he (the accountant) could keep any extra money he saved him over the other fellows tax return. He did this several times that first year, until finally one accountant told him that there was no way he could do any better than the previous fellow. The previous accountant has been my dad's tax man for about 35 years. May not work these days...but it might be worth a shot for a newb. Costs some extra money the first year, but I know my dad has saved plenty over the years to make up for it.

      Chris

    21. Re:Get an Accountant by testpoint · · Score: 1

      Call them (after April 15th) and interview them just as you would any other employee. Find someone with small business experience who you will enjoy working with. Expect them to ask questions too and if your business is really a hobby, it will only take a good CPA a few minutes to make that determination.

    22. Re:Get an Accountant by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

      He may be using the corporate structure to help shield his personal assets from business liability.

    23. Re:Get an Accountant by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

      Also, if you earn less than $600 on a business for more than a couple of years, the IRS literally considers it a hobby, not a business.

      It's not that simple (of course...). If you make a profit (not necessarily more than $600) in three out of five consecutive years, then the IRS presumes you have a profit motive, i.e., you are running a legitimate business, and not just trying to use your hobby expenses to reduce taxable income.

    24. Re:Get an Accountant by testpoint · · Score: 1

      Taxes are just one of your many responsibilities as a business owner.

      Most (all?) states have annual incorporation filing fees and other mandatory annual supplications you must perform.

      Penalties for screwing these up are stiff because politicians get votes for dumping on "evil" corporations. If you think you're under the radar because you haven't gotten any notifications, remember that bureaucratic wheels turn very slowly but when the start to turn they have nearly unlimited resources to grind you into dust.

      Get professional help fast.

    25. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      gosh,which nuts to believe?
      the ones uncovering the horseshit or the ones manufacturing it.
      guess it pays to check it all out yourself instead
      of just going on eithers word.
      I know many old men who are living tax free,social security free and have been doing so for more than a decade now.
      guess the old guys without familys are braver and more likely to try tax free living.
      dangerous,yes. but then most things worth doing carry some risk.I dont advocate anything,but,I also figure that if it was worth it to give our lives to overthrow tyranny 200+ yrs ago,then it follows that its worth it to protest,bugger the courts up with,and eventually free ourselves from the LIE of income taxes.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    26. Re:Get an Accountant by JJahn · · Score: 1

      And if he is, he should be an LLC (if available in your state, I think they are everywhere but I am no tax pro) not a corporation. Its considerably less hassle and you still get your liability protection.

    27. Re:Get an Accountant by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      In case you missed it, the link I pointed to also mentioned judges levying multi-thousand dollar fines on people "buggering the courts up" with frivolous arguments wasting everybody's time.

      Face reality: the U.S. government has the power to levy taxes on your income and require you to fill out the 1040 form accurately. Not doing so opens you up to all sorts of legal penalties. I suppose if you also knew a bunch of old bank robbers, you'd tell us we should all take our pistols into bank offices and make money the brave way and tax free, too. Didn't you hear? The laws against bank robbery weren't written in the right color ink....

      Why don't you go off somewhere and square the circle with a compass and straightedge?

    28. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      I guess you dont get that these "old guys" do go
      to court,and come out again unscathed.Amazing to me.
      Like I said I dont advocate action to anyone,but in your case I suppose it would be best for you to
      just march down to the IRS and wrap your lips around the directors rod.Your such a good boy!
      Why without sheep like you,we could never feed all those welfare babies let alone gas their caddies or fund research into how swallowing bubblegum affects the colons of rhesus monkeys.
      I may not participate,but I am glad for
      people who stand up to tyranny and "think for
      themselves" without fools like you dissuading them.Theyve been successful so far.If enough
      of it finally happens,people begin to notice.
      When enough see the emperor has no clothes,then
      things will change.
      I see you affecting no change,only trying
      to drag others down,but then youre probably just
      an irs lackey or a sore loser who got spanked in
      tax court.
      Me,yeah I still pay taxes,when I get older and
      my kids are on their own.... well,we'll just see about that when the time comes.
      Good thing that the great men in history never listened to the everpresent knuckleheads like you or their accomplishments would never've happened.Get a clue!Get some imagination!Then get a life! I wonder how many people you hold down around you.Bet you try to convince 'em how clever
      you are with psuedo-intellectual pessimism.
      Ive found people like that tend to hang with more
      mentally challenged people in order to appear genius.
      Get some slack,jack,geez!

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    29. Re:Get an Accountant by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I guess you dont get that these "old guys" do go to court,and come out again unscathed.Amazing to me.

      Shouldn't be that amazing. It's pretty simple: The people who get hit with $100000 fines are not placed on the list of "old guys who come out unscathed."

      I can come up with a short list of people who have committed murder and not been prosecuted; does that mean that you should feel free to go out committing murders without fear of punishment?

      Some people get lucky. There are a lot of people. You will probably not be the lucky one. The lucky ones become famous.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    30. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      raju wrote"Shouldn't be that amazing. It's pretty simple: The people who get hit with $100000 fines are not placed on the list of "old guys who come out unscathed."

      sorry,contradiction still isn't a valid argument

      raju wrote" I can come up with a short list of people who have committed murder and not been prosecuted; does that mean that you should feel free to go out committing murders without fear of punishment?

      I can come up with a list also of immoral people who do wrong to their fellow man.however instead I chose to speak of my list of patriotic citizens
      who,recognising tyrrany and injustice fight it so that other citizens of the several states can enjoy the freedom our forefathers intended.Even dupes like you will benefit.So if you cant lead or follow,shutup and get back in the kitchen sister-boy.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    31. Re:Get an Accountant by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Shouldn't be that amazing. It's pretty simple: The people who get hit with $100000 fines are not placed on the list of "old guys who come out unscathed."
      sorry,contradiction still isn't a valid argument

      If you want to participate in a debate, you're required to do a little thinking, and maybe even exercise your logic bone now and then. I hate to spell everything out from A to B to C because then it sounds like I'm talking to morons. But here goes.

      You (or someone; I'm too lazy to check) claim that not paying taxes works perfectly well, and to prove it, you have a list of people who have not paid their taxes and have managed to evade adverse judgments in court.

      The logical response to that is to question the comprehensiveness of the list and its stability over time. If your list contains everyone who didn't pay taxes and fought it in court, and they all remain unscathed from year to year, then congratulations, you have made a point.

      If, on the other hand (which seems much more likely), your list just contains "some people who didn't pay their taxes and managed to make it past a judge" then it doesn't prove anything, because that list may only be 2% of the people who tried. It may be that all the people on the list get busted the next year. Without further proof, the contention that you introduced (namely, that it's feasible not to pay taxes) remains unsubstantiated and and is of no more use to readers here than any random piece of fiction.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    32. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      actually,yes these are people who consistently evade taxation by using the law,the tax code and much study of the subject.In fact,they network and support each other.tricky,but it seems to work.
      Yes,I see youre too lazy to follow the link at the start of this sub-thread.perhaps you wouldve been more challenging and entertaining.
      But,without an understanding of the reasons and advantages of living without an income tax,I agree must make it hard for you to imagine it as anything but fiction.
      Your reward is no greater than your effort.
      Many places on the net to find info and even contact these people.If you and the other sheeple could possibly learn to use a search engine and research the subject,then we'd have something to debate.untill then just keep bleating,"freedom baaaaaad,taxes good."
      I cant think of anyone except socialist democrats who like taxes.in fact from republicans to libertarians to freemen,everyone has a BIG problem with the mistake of income taxation.
      oddly,you dont.
      Therefore I am the one left dealing with morons.
      raju,i'll tell you something valuable."if you've been playing pocker for an hour and dont know who the chump is......youre it!ticket for the cluetrain.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    33. Re:Get an Accountant by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      If you read the link you originally posted (or at least, tried to post), you discover the same tired and false arguments that tax "protesters" use to claim that the federal income tax does not apply to them, or to just about anyone.

      The argument that the federal government only has the power to levy taxes in the zone of its "exclusive jurisdiction", meaning only D.C. and some American possessions, for instance, is completely ludicrous. It is taken as "proof" that almost everyone born in the 50 states is not a citizen for tax purposes.

      If you think for just a moment about how much effort goes into developing the tax code by Congress, do you really think that they are doing all this work, sending out all these forms, for something that only applies to maybe one or two million people? Every single member of Congress, who *write* these laws, believes they apply to everyone born in the 50 states. If they made some technical error (given that the 16th amendment actually was ratified, disagreeing with another quite spurious argument from your source), they would have repaired it.

      If you don't want to pay taxes, then don't. But don't claim that some tortured reading of the tax code or Constitution or Bible justifies it.

    34. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      actually when you think about it...if you dont take the constitution in the language it was written and compared to the legal dictionary of its day,then I suppose you would'nt think that
      the Congress hadn't gotten one over on us.
      So,your points are still full of "power and fury,signifying nothing."
      I've been following the work of these people,from the nuts like the freemen to even movie stars like "John Quaid".While a final clear answer of the legality of taxes remains masked beneath judicial obscurity and a lack of in depth press on the subject.It still appears to the trained and untrained eye that we're being screwed.
      I think you'll find it interesting the far reaching that the fed had to do in order to make it appear legal.But then you are probably just as
      satisfied to holler "ludicrous" and pretend to know what youre talking about without and extra study or effort.
      Who cares how much congress writes?We'd all be better off if their pay was deducted by a standard amount for each word written.Oh,and anyone who believes congress would even think of
      repairing or deleting the tax code were it proven folly,well,just go stand on your heads in the corner till we get a count.We pay for all the forms being sent out,why would congress take it as a problem?doesn't hurt them in the least.
      Damn,if youre going to investigate something,include motive.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    35. Re:Get an Accountant by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Your mistake is where you assume that a layperson with a law dictionary and a copy of the Constitution is qualified to answer questions of constitutional law. That has never been the case. That's why there have been lawyers and judges since the dawn of written law.

      You are right up there with all the nut cases who believe that any old guy with a compass and straightedge is qualified to determine whether the circle can be squared. Even though mathematically-trained people can understand that it has been proven impossible, and it is no longer up for debate.

      "Study" and "effort" in this field include going to law school, not reading the radical rantings of some unschooled kook.

    36. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      your mistake is assuming that a layperson is not responsible for protecting their freedoms.
      your flaw in logic is that judges and lawyers are automatically correct.
      (note: aforementioned old guys seem to be qualified to answer questions of constitutional law with a law dictionary and a copy of the Constitution concidering their successes.) you also discount research as rantings without anything solid to substantiate it.
      I could see than anyone not speaking legalese would appear to rant at this wrong.i also concider
      their audience.people like you or i.
      so far you are all opinion and no substance.
      you are right up there with all the crusty old math teachers who still use the adage of the hand squared circle.
      you seem satisfied with regurgitating someones opinion you learned.
      thanks,i'll gladly continue to think for myself.I'll also continue to collect facts till i'm scientifically satisfied of the truth.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    37. Re:Get an Accountant by jaoswald · · Score: 1

      Law is not a science. There is no scientific proof that determines whether or not the IRS can collect taxes from you. That is a legal question, decided by the legal system. The law has no other meaning.

    38. Re:Get an Accountant by flyneye · · Score: 1

      forensics however is a science.
      when you collect enough facts to fill in the spaces of the unknown you can theorize,when you can prove these facts to be the cohesive makeup of the whole you have truth.
      Of course law hasn't much to do with truth.
      Therefore its up to the layman to defend themselves and their freedoms by fighting bad laws.
      when law is defeated enough times its modified or removed.remember law is made by dishonest men of ambition and little forethought,upheld by men of little thought and judged by lawyers who weren't smart enough or well connected enough to be employed by a firm(where the money is).
      legal questions are arbitrated and law is interpreted leaving us vulnerable to the ambitions of those who benefit from taxes.
      get a clue,youre a very silly little boy and
      you talk nonsense.
      obviously you are satisfied with your rote learning and have never questioned anything presented to you as fact.good sheep.make sure you
      never question authority.just do everything the nice officer says and everything will be alright.
      suckup will make you a good pliable subject but
      contradiction and regurgitation will never make you a lawyer or much of anything.youre a slave and have no slack.come back when youve some background kid.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  3. A tip... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 0

    Apply for an extension, turn your taxes in late. Ya see, the IRS has a quota to fill for audits, and by the time the late taxes come in, they have already filled it. The chances of getting audited are very slim if you turn in late as opposed to turning in on time.

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:A tip... by wcdw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, studies have long shown that the best time to submit your taxes to avoid audits is right on the cusp of the deadline. Your return has a larger chance of getting 'lost in the shuffle' this way.

      On the other hand, there *is* a ~2% random audit process which can still result in your return being looked at in more detail - sometimes months or years after it is filed.

      As for best tax filing tips -- and despite the piss poor attempts at DRM in this year's version -- skip the accountant and use TurboTax.

      The other tax programs may be on a par with TT - I started using TT with its first release and have never looked back - but TT *is* a first-rate accountant - and one that never gets sleepy, overworked or makes mistakes.

      Unless you're completely clueless about taxes, and can not understand the govt instructions (which are no worse than, say, the average dot-matrix printer user's manual from 1983 ;), the accountant is unlikely to have enough time to know your business well enough to 'find' more deductions, other than the 'obvious' ones.

      If you have a corporate accountant on-staff / on-call, then absolutely let them handle the taxes. You DO trust them, right?

      Finally, a comment regarding filing in general: If you are owed a refund, you do NOT have to file by the deadline. If you consistently refuse to file, after a few years the IRS will file on your behalf, using stock #s from your employer-submitted W2s. At that time you can file 1040-X forms showing the real numbers and claim your refund. (Refunds expire after 5 years!)

      I don't recommend this practice, but I have used and have known others who have used it.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
  4. Hmm by rzbx · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sell drugs. Its risky, but supposedly the profits are great. The best thing is you don't have to worry about taxes, just skip them altogether. You'll be out of luck if they decide to legalize and tax it though. Jail time, risk of getting shot, etc. are all bad things as well. Then again, stick to whatever your doing. Sorry I can't help with your taxes.

    --
    Question everything.
    1. Re:Hmm by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      Sell drugs. Its risky, but supposedly the profits are great. The best thing is you don't have to worry about taxes, just skip them altogether.

      Taxes. It's my anti-drug.
    2. Re:Hmm by bloo9298 · · Score: 1

      Of course you have to pay taxes on the drugs you sell!

    3. Re:Hmm by ShadowFlyP · · Score: 1

      Actually, even if you make your money from illegal activities you still need to claim taxes on it. That's what they caught Mr. Capone at, tax evasion.

    4. Re:Hmm by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 3, Funny

      Interestingly enough, drug dealers are the only people in the world who the U.S. tax system does not give a deduction for ordinary business expenses. (There is legislative history, though, that this is not meant to disallow the subtraction of cost of goods sold.) If you're in the murder-for-hire business, make sure you don't also deal drugs, or you run the risk the IRS will think your bullets are for defense of your drug territory and disallow your deduction for them.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    5. Re:Hmm by Fubar · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Personally, I don't get taxes. I sure as hell never agreed to be under the rule of the Gov't. (so what, you were born here, you have to pay the taxes). So f*ing what. Nothing gives them the right to take my money to spend on things that I disagree with and then rape me by passing legislation that makes it illegal for me to do anything.

      The good news is "they" (the Gov't) can't make you stay in this apparently repressive country. Vote with your feet.

    6. Re:Hmm by stevejsmith · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I don't get taxes. I sure as hell never agreed to be under the rule of the Gov't. (so what, you were born here, you have to pay the taxes). So f*ing what. Nothing gives them the right to take my money to spend on things that I disagree with and then rape me by passing legislation that makes it illegal for me to do anything.

      You're a fucking moron. As much as I feel that doesn't even need to be backed up, I will for the sake of my already-floundering karma.

      See, the thing is, you are paying the government for services and products. Sure, they disguise the costs by calling them taxes, but they are really just charges for the following services:

      1. Roads, sidewalks, public works projects, etc.
      2. Domestic protection (the police)
      3. Foreign protection (the military)
      4. Assistance in certain situations (hospitals)
      5. A fucking education (schools, free libraries)

      As nice as I've been about this, you're still a fucking moron. Oh, and as a previous poster said: move, you dumbass. To where? Antarctica. What gives the government the right to be on your land? Simple: they can be and they will be. Who ever gave you the notion that you are born into this world with possesions and that you have inaliable rights? Maybe you do under the Constitution, but a government's first and foremost responsibility is to watch its back, or else it won't be there to watch yours.

      MORON.

    7. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you're in the murder-for-hire business...
      Murder for hire business? Isn't that more commonly known as 'the military'?
    8. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dumbass mods. How is that a troll??? How is explaining to some uninformed dipshit trolling???

    9. Re:Hmm by bluprint · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Assistance in certain situations (hospitals)

      And the government pays for this why? I tell you what, I'll be responsible for my own medical coverage, if you start paying half my tax bill. I doubt you'll jump at that opportunity...

      A fucking education (schools, free libraries)

      The only thing you have to pay on for your entire lifetime. What a deal!! Thanks :)

      I like how you convieniently leave out the myriad of other things our tax dollars are waisted on..red tape, "social programs", etc.

      ever gave you the notion that you are born into this world with possesions and that you have inaliable rights? Maybe you do under the Constitution, but...

      Yeah, that silly constitution thing...what were those people smoking back then? Oh, yeah, I forgot, they didn't have all this taxation to influence peoples' behavior...so there's no telling what they were smoking.

      What gives the government the right to be on your land? Simple: they can be and they will be.

      Somehow, I think if I were in your house, and had you at gun point, "because I can", you would be singing a different tune. It's strage that people have no problems letting "the governement" (as if it's some sort of unidentifiable entity) do things that those same people would not be at all happy about if someone else were doing it.... Sheep.

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    10. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and some guy in Texas actually paid his. Needless to say, it didn't take long to be busted.

    11. Re:Hmm by stevejsmith · · Score: 3

      And the government pays for this why? I tell you what, I'll be responsible for my own medical coverage, if you start paying half my tax bill. I doubt you'll jump at that opportunity...

      Well of course not, dumbass, you're not paying 50% of your taxes to our healthcare system.

      The only thing you have to pay on for your entire lifetime. What a deal!! Thanks :)

      You're paying for libraries, your children's education, and if not your children's, then other people's children's education.

      Yeah, that silly constitution thing...what were those people smoking back then? Oh, yeah, I forgot, they didn't have all this taxation to influence peoples' behavior...so there's no telling what they were smoking.

      What gives you the idea that you are entitled to land? Just because the Constitution says so? The Constitution is only good when there is a government. What government is there if you're not paying taxes?

      Nobody is born into this world with rights. Just because you were the winning sperm doesn't give you any rights. What in our genetic code gives you rights? Nothing. This is an artifical idea of ours of rights. You're lucky that you get to keep anything, for that matter, because the government could easily take it all away from you. Nowhere did I say that this was fair or that I'm happy with it, I'm just saying that they could and nobody would care if you, being a lazy fuck who doesn't even understand the principles of an organized government, died because they killed you, took your land, and gave it to somebody who could use it. You fucking pathetic waste of life.

    12. Re:Hmm by bloo9298 · · Score: 1
      ...and some guy in Texas actually paid his. Needless to say, it didn't take long to be busted.

      But, but, but, ..., they promised not to report anyone! That's not fair.

    13. Re:Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you helped hire them, so blood's on your hands as well.

    14. Re:Hmm by sambira · · Score: 1

      If you are in this country, you are under the rule of this government. If this is not to your liking, you can try to change it by going through the provided channels or move somewhere else in the world. THIS is your right. If you choose the later, I hear Iraq is a wonderful place at this time. There is no government and you would not have to pay any taxes. In addition, you could pretty much do as you wish.

    15. Re:Hmm by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Are you referring to the actual case where a bank robber deducted the cost of his gun and bullets as a tax deduction, and it was judged to be a valid expense in court?

      On an semi-unrelated note, there was actually a drug dealer who went to jail, etc., and on release put "Interstate Drug Dealer" on his resume. Apparently, he had a lot more than a small-time operation, and was hiring truck drivers, coordinating shipments, etc. I dont know if he actually got a legit job with this tactic, however.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    16. Re:Hmm by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      There is absolutely no question that expenses incurred in a criminal business are deductible (to the same extent as in a legitimate business) except where a specific rule provides otherwise. (Guns should presumably be depreciated rather than deducted immediately.) Remember that the deduction for business expenses is not some kind of subsidy for businesses we want to encourage, it is fundamental to the tax system's goal of taxing income (i.e., profit) rather than revenue (i.e., sales with no deductions for expenses).

      The best known exception is for bribes and kickbacks, which are not deductible and subject to other unfavorable treatment (e.g., they automatically constitute "Subpart F Income," which means that if a foreign corporation owned by Americans pays bribes, the bribes are actually taxable to the American stockholders immediately). The drug-dealers' exception is in I.R.C. section 280E. As you can see, it is very clearly limited to (illegal) drug dealers, which clearly implies that other criminals are not subject to this treatment.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    17. Re:Hmm by t0ny · · Score: 1
      I guess this leads me to another question, which would be why, if they are going to make a law, why didnt they exclude all expenses related to illegal activities, instead of limiting it to illegal activities involved in drug trafficing?

      Not that there is probably a good answer to this (or any other "why?" question), but it just seems silly.

      Thanks for the info, btw. Its very amusing, and actually illustrates proper use of tax deductions.

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    18. Re:Hmm by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      Well, there are a couple of reasons. For one thing, disallowing the deduction of expenses would hit some crimes much harder than others in ways not really related to how bad the crime is. The cost of bullets is (I would imagine) small compared to the cost of ordering a hit, which means hitmen would not be much affected by losing their deduction. On the other hand, if an investment bank violated some technical regulation in the course of buying a bunch of stock for $1 billion and reselling it for $1,001,000,000, it might be forced out of business.

      The real answer is that there are "whys" behind the tax code, but not a single set of consistent explanations. There are two separate themes running throughout: one, economically correct taxation, which should seek to tax all income equally so as to minimize distortions; and two, arbitrary-looking rules to achieve all sorts of goals, great and petty. Congress wants to encourage efficient business arrangement, so it gives us detailed rules on consolidated returns and foreign passive investment companies; it wants to encourage Christmas tree growing, fraternal societies organized on the lodge system, and mobile machinery equipment, so it provides subsidies for all of them. If the Code should discourage crime, then it should have lots of special penalties for it; if it should promote economic efficiency and leave social policy to the criminal justice system, then it should treat crime the same as everything else. Either approach makes sense; it only doesn't make sense to do what Congress does, and take each approach in some cases, with no coherent pattern.

      The interaction between the tax system and crime has been studied extensively, and there are more puzzling aspects to it: fines are generally not deductible; on the other hand, being sent to prison hurts partially because of lost income opportunities, but we don't try to tax you on the income you forgo. This is an area of active economic research.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
  5. Tax Tips For Small Folks? by TC+(WC) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Looking at the headline, my first though was "Wow, what special tax needs do midgets have?"

    1. Re:Tax Tips For Small Folks? by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 4, Funny

      They can only fill out the short form.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    2. Re:Tax Tips For Small Folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax Tips for Small Folks?

      Yes, tips and gratuities are generally included in your income, regardless of your physical stature.

    3. Re:Tax Tips For Small Folks? by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

      1040 XS

    4. Re:Tax Tips For Small Folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Wow, what special tax needs do midgets have?

      That's "LITTLE PEOPLE," you insensitive clod!!!

  6. Simple tip: Don't pay em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are what, 300 million Americans? They'll probably never even notice you didn't pay them! And, if they do, just apologize and say you didn't know you had to. They'll understand. The government (the IRS in particular) is very understanding.

    1. Re:Simple tip: Don't pay em! by Elbereth · · Score: 1

      Works for me. I didn't pay taxes until I was over 25. 'Course, I didn't have a job, either. The tricky part is finding a girlfriend with an apartment, car, and job. Jobs are for people who aren't very good at sex.

    2. Re:Simple tip: Don't pay em! by Zelxyb · · Score: 1

      Works for me. I didn't pay taxes until I was over 25. 'Course, I didn't have a job, either. The tricky part is finding a girlfriend with an apartment, car, and job. Jobs are for people who aren't very good at sex.

      Dude, last I checked, your girlfriend wasn't that bad.

    3. Re:Simple tip: Don't pay em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean that she wasn't? I mean, if she could really suck your dick like a vaccuum, then wouldn't you think that she'd be able to find someone to bring home the bacon for her?

  7. Re:Handly list of links I've used since 99 by subzerohen · · Score: 1

    Waring!!! Parent URL contains goatse link...

  8. Jeopardy by Future+Linux-Guru · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have no revenue

    The question, Alex Trebek, is:

    "Who is RedHat?"

    1. Re:Jeopardy by Apreche · · Score: 1

      incorrect

      the correct question was

      "Who is Mandrake?"

      --
      The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
    2. Re:Jeopardy by los+furtive · · Score: 1

      They have revenue, and it has been increasing in a period where most companies revenue is shrinking. Mandrake's problem is that it's expenses, while shrinking, are still greater than its revenue.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

  9. Small? by jay-be-em · · Score: 1

    Use a very small pen.

    --
    "Orthodoxy means not thinking--not needing to think. Orthodoxy is unconsciousness." --Eric Blair
  10. You don't have to pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'v heard (rumor and from tax professionals) that if you haven't ever paid taxes before in the past, you dont ever have to pay them. The first time you fill out the tax forms, your commiting to pay in the future. However, if when you came of legal age and knew this, and didnt start paying taxes.. youd never have to pay them. Granted, you'd probably get money back on your first few jobs digging ditches and what nought, but its good forsight for the future..

    1. Re:You don't have to pay by wcdw · · Score: 1

      And if you believe that, you deserve what you get.

      Consider: Anyone who is withholding taxes on your behalf (which is *mandantory* and has been since WWII) is required to report that information to the IRS.

      Voila! They have just 'filed' on your behalf, whether you do anything or not.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    2. Re:You don't have to pay by monkeydo · · Score: 1

      Minor correction. You can probably get away with never filing a tax return, but you won't get away with never paying taxes. File a zero return all day long. Don't file any return. As long as your employer keeps witholding taxes from your paycheck you are paying taxes. Witholding is structured such that if you don't have a bunch of other income you should get a refund every year, in which case the only purpose of filing is to get your money back. Even if the IRS did eventually come knocking they'd proabably wind up owing you money after the audit.

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
  11. Tips for midgets and dwarves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (That's what the headline means by small folks right?)

    All of the height tools you need, and things of that sort, can be deducted as medical expenses. This includes shoes with lifts, and even clothes that make you look taller.

  12. Re:Handly list of links I've used since 99 by subzerohen · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why doesn't slashcode just dissallow posting url's that contain the string "goatse" or the IP number for "goatse"?

  13. Do like.. by ewhenn · · Score: 1

    .. the pros at Enron.. negative earnings!

    1. Re:Do like.. by deanj · · Score: 1

      They only screwed up because some goofball accidently had an abs() in the wrong place...doh!

  14. complexity in US taxes by Submarine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I must say I've never been able to understand how the American public can put up with the convoluted US tax system. I'm not talking of people with small businesses on the side, but of ordinary folks who have a salary, some investments, maybe rent a room from their house, and have to pay a professional tax account to fill in their tax return!

    Also, doesn't the IRS provide information on how to fill the forms? (For instance, the French tax services have email addresses you can send tax queries to, and they do answer.)

    1. Re:complexity in US taxes by villain170 · · Score: 1

      Also, doesn't the IRS provide information on how to fill the forms? (For instance, the French tax services have email addresses you can send tax queries to, and they do answer.)

      ha ha ha. Sure they provide information, but it's as confusing as the system. Also, I doubt you'd get an answer unless it was some automated response. :)

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    2. Re:complexity in US taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not so hard. if you could do your algebra homework, you can do your US income taxes.

      the problem is 1) nobody pays attention to taxes until the night before they are due, and 2) americans are generally afraid of numbers and anything that involves combining them.

      the IRS in my experience has been very helpful, and there are several private organizations that give tax assistance.

      the tax forms and publications are long but they are accurate and concise (again, my opinion), and are designed to cover a WIDE variety of cases (are you a farmer? a member of the clergy? single? married? etc etc).

    3. Re:complexity in US taxes by revitup.org · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but out of curiousity, what's the average tax % rate in France?

    4. Re:complexity in US taxes by JCholewa · · Score: 1

      > Yeah, but out of curiousity, what's
      > the average tax % rate in France?

      I'd be willing to pay more taxes for both more government services AND less complexity in the tax system.

      -JC

    5. Re:complexity in US taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then please move to france.

    6. Re:complexity in US taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the average tax % rate in France?

      Don't know about average, but tax rates range from -10% up to +65%. (Yes, you can get negative tax, although it's not called that, if you have very low income yet work a significant number of hours.)

    7. Re:complexity in US taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that bad. If you want it to be easy and don't mind potentially missing out on some deductions or something, fill out form 1040EZ. It has like 6 or 8 blanks on it and takes about 10 minutes. Or if that's too hard, you can do the whole thing over the phone and fill out no forms whatsoever.

      You also have the option in some cases, IIRC, to ask the IRS to compute your taxes for you and just tell you how much you owe.

      If you want to take a more sophisticated approach and potentially pay less tax, walk in to H&R Block or something and pay them whatever they charge ($50 or $75) to do it all for you. Last time I did that, it took only about an hour.

      Granted, if you have a bunch of investments and random stuff that complicates your finances, your taxes will be harder. But so will everything else, so why is this surprising?

    8. Re:complexity in US taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So pay more. Just don't force me to. I paid $45,000 in taxes last year. That's plenty.

    9. Re:complexity in US taxes by jn42 · · Score: 1

      Here in the US that's the Earned Income Credit. It's possible for a parent of a child to work for roughly minimum wage, total about $16,000 a year income, pay $600 in federal taxes through withholding, then get back $3000. j

    10. Re:complexity in US taxes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not a complicated as people makeit seem.
      And all the information you can possible need is available from the IRS.
      Plus you can buy software that will tell you what you need. If I was the original poster, I'd probably get the software.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:complexity in US taxes by mapmaker · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Clearly you are unaware just how stupid much of the American public is. I mean, who do you think voted for Bush anyway? There aren't *that* many Enron execs in the US!

    12. Re:complexity in US taxes by Submarine · · Score: 1

      I don't think that an "average tax % rate" makes much sense. What is often advertised in the US newspapers as a horrible tax rate is the marginal rate, which almost nobody pays (you have to have a really enormous income, and there are rebates and such that make it unlikely).

      I personally pay about 10%. Of course there's also VAT (the sales tax), which is between 0% and 18.6% depending on the product bought.

      Yet, I don't quite see your point. Whether you tax people a lot or not doesn't change the fact that filing taxes shouldn't require a professional unless the situation is really complex.

    13. Re:complexity in US taxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an American living in the UK for the last four years, I have had the chance to see both systems. While both systems are overly complex, the US system is better than the UK system. If you dig into the documentation in the US, you can usually find a clear definition of the rules you should apply. With the UK, the wording of the tax laws are more ambiguous, and I am less sure that I have interpreted things correctly.

      To address the complexity that IS there, I have three tips:
      1) Buy a tax program. My favorite is TurboTax.
      2) Don't move to another country. Then you end up doing two sets of taxes--and trying to figure out which set of rules applies this year. (Have I been in the UK 180 days in this tax year? Do those US stocks I sold count as capital gains in the US, or in the UK? ....)
      3) If you didn't listen to #2, consider a professional accountant to get you over the transition.

    14. Re:complexity in US taxes by testpoint · · Score: 1

      "And all the information you can possible (sic) need is available from the IRS."
      True enough. All 54846 pages of it. With its continuous growth and morphing, it's too hideous to behold.

    15. Re:complexity in US taxes by jjo · · Score: 1

      The complexity in US taxes is solely due to political considerations in Congress. The Internal Revenue Code (the US federal tax law) is HUGE, taking up many large tomes of closely-printed text.

      The reason for this (and why it will always be so) is that every one of the unnecessary provisions in the tax code benefits someone, usually quite a bit. It's true that each of those provisions also hurts all the other tax-paying Americans by requiring them to pay more tax, but each provision makes only a tiny difference to the tax-paying public in general, while making a big difference to those who benefit from their special tax advantage.

      An easy example is the mortgage tax deduction. In the US, homeowners who carry a mortgage loan on their home can deduct the loan interest from their taxable income. This really runs counter to the whole idea of income taxation, which is to tax people according to their ability to pay. Those who rent their homes have no more (and probably less) ability to pay than those who own, but they must pay more tax. Despite this, since the mortgage deduction is in the tax code now, it is utterly impossible to remove it due to opposition from the people who benefit from it.

      Another example is the municipal bond exemption. All interest income is subject to income tax, unless the interest is on a bond issued by a state or local government. Again, this runs against the fundamental rationale for an income tax, and is probably even worse than the mortgage deduction, since the municipal bond exemption has no maximum limit. Yet this too is impossible to eliminate, due to support from both investors and local governments, since this means that such governments can borrow money for significantly less than the normal rate of interest.

      Take these examples and multiply them many thousandfold, and you get an idea of the magnitude of the problem. The tax forms are impossibly complex because the tax code is impossibly complex.

    16. Re:complexity in US taxes by stickyc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The reason we're forced to put up with our insane tax laws is because the people who write them are allowed to pay outside firms to do their taxes for them.
      I'm convinced that if members of our congress were required to prepare their own taxes, the tax forms would consist of "In 2002, you made $X from all sources of income. Please send a check for $Y to:...."

      And we'd still have audits...

    17. Re:complexity in US taxes by sheldon · · Score: 1

      The Tax Accountants lobby is a pretty powerful force. If taxes were that simple thousands of people would be out of jobs, and they know that.

    18. Re:complexity in US taxes by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Without our complex Amerian taxation system, companies like Microsoft would actually have to give money to the government every year.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  15. As usual by djupedal · · Score: 0, Troll

    "The small folks will drown in their own blood on the walls of Baghdad...as usual. We will be killing all of the infidal small folks and their so very, very small taxes very soon, and I can take you to them in, oh...say....twenty minutes, God willing, Allah be blessed." ~ M.S.S.

    1. Re:As usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Allah has abondoned you because you are an ignorant barbarian who supports murder. My advice: You should seriously consider suicide, you really have nothing to live for.

  16. RTFTM by sheemwaza · · Score: 4, Informative

    When the IRS sends you the forms, they come inside a large book which explains line by line how to do your taxes. I suggest reading the pages explaining the Schedule C, which covers a personally owned business. If you made zero dollars, that could be good news because any business expenses become tax deductible. Unfortunately, if you don't turn a profit in three years, the IRS considers your business a hobby and will make you pay back taxes on your deductions... Also, the Publication 17 is a great tax reference. All available online or at your local library...

    1. Re:RTFTM by joshtimmons · · Score: 4, Informative

      You obviously don't have a C corporation. The Schedule C is for sole proprietorships. A corp C is much different and as far as I know, there is no fine manual (FM). Every year, our accountant generates a stack of forms about an inch thick for our corporation C taxes, then gives us about 10 more pages to go with our 1040. We don't use schedule C at all.

      That said, this person (with no sales or revenue to speak of) should not have incorporated yet. He should have been a sole prop or LLC. Then he could use the schedule C and he would reasonably have been able to do it himself. IMHO, there's no need to own a corporation unless you are making enough for it to be worth the bother.

      Gotta love the tax system! No, really, you gotta!

    2. Re:RTFTM by jdonnici · · Score: 1

      If you made zero dollars, that could be good news because any business expenses become tax deductible. Unfortunately, if you don't turn a profit in three years, the IRS considers your business a hobby and will make you pay back taxes on your deductions...

      While the latter part is true (3 years without profit is a hobby), the former part is a potential red flag. If you itemize and deduct business expenses on a Schedule C and don't claim any income at all, alarms go off somewhere within the IRS and they get the pencil sharpeners warmed up. To avoid hassles, you really want to show something on the income side of the equation, no matter how small.

      That said, the original poster is talking about a C-Corp and I believe that's a very different beast than a personal business (schedule C).

      Unless a generous CPA happens to be surfing /. and chooses to post some advice, the first response above to go see an accountant is the best advice on this thread. Even just hitting an H&R Block (or similar) and paying a couple hundred is a worthwhile exercise (most of them are moonlighting accountants). They typically charge by the number of forms required in your return... and I'd bet that you could call a local office and get an estimate over the phone of what your costs will be.

      Paying a little bit now could save a lot of headache and expense down the road.

    3. Re:RTFTM by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 5, Informative

      How does this post deceive us? Let me count the ways.

      1. Schedule C, and the rest of Form 1040, are for individuals only. A C corporation will be filing Form 1120. The Service does provide publications "explaining" this form, but we are talking about a lot more complexity.

      2. The individual cannot deduct the corporation's business expenses. The corporation just wouldn't owe any taxes, and could (potentially) carry the net operating loss forward to future years, but the losses of a C corporation cannot reduce its shareholders' taxes.

      3. It's not 3 consecutive years, it's 3 years out of 5 (except that it's 2 out of 7 in the case of certain horse-related businesses).

      4. It's not up to the IRS. The Code uses this as a presumption only. It is always a question of fact: if an individual has an honest subjective intent to make a profit at an activity, the expenses are deductible; if not, they are not (with many exceptions, as usual).

      5. None of that matters, since it's the corporation's taxes. You can't possibly reduce your taxes by forming a corporation to pay the costs of your hobby. Deductions would be disallowed if, hypothetically, the corporation did not have a profit motive, but a bigger worry would be the almost certain constructive dividend treatment of payment of the shareholder's expenses. But the deduction is worthless to a corporation with no income anyway.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    4. Re:RTFTM by sjoplin · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately, if you don't turn a profit in three years, the IRS considers your business a hobby and will make you pay back taxes on your deductions.
      So does that mean that dot-com-ers (Jeff Bezos et. al.) are hobbyists?
    5. Re:RTFTM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd go even further than that. It's probably asinine to set up a small business as a C corp rather than an LLC or one of the other tax favored entitites. I can see some benefits to being an S corp. However once you form a corporation it's generally difficult tax wise to convert it to something else.

      The tax treatment for one of the liability protected partnerships is far more favorable than a C corp.

    6. Re:RTFTM by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Just 1 answer to all 5 points: The original poster never said it was a coporation, just a small business. This is likely a single owner or a small partnership- NOT a corporation.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:RTFTM by operagost · · Score: 1

      Yes, if they Amazon was a sole proprietorship.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  17. Re:Handly list of links I've used since 99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why doesn't slashcode just dissallow posting url's that contain the string "goatse" or the IP number for "goatse"?


    I agree. It's hard as hell to explain to normal people the fascination that supposedly "straight" people have for showing each other some guy's ass. :(
  18. Dump the corp by RealBeanDip · · Score: 1

    You don't need to incorporate. I know, I did it, once. You can easily get a checking account as a DBA (doing business as) to keep things seperate from your "regular" account. If you have a corporation, then you have to start dealing with things like paying unemployment insurance, and filling out forms saying you're an equal oppurtunity employer, etc... it's a pain the ass, and not worth it.

    So again, dump the corporation and use a Sched C. Put 0's on it, it's pretty easy to do.

    If you CAN'T close the corp, then you're either going to have to learn a lot, or hire an accountant.

    --

    You know you're a geek if you've ever replied to a tagline.

    1. Re:Dump the corp by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are benefits to having a small business where you can demonstrate that you're making the effort to behave like a business. You can deduct certain business expenses, and depreciate equipment like computers. You exchange pain-in-the-ass time for a refund. You need to decide for yourself if it's worth it.

      My question is - why a C-corp? I created an LLC to simplify my paperwork and to only get taxed once. Without knowing the details of your situation, your general description makes me think that an LLC would be more appropriate. At a minimum, the paperwork is much simpler.

    2. Re:Dump the corp by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      Ah, more (probably) bad tax advice from Out There.

      Yes, forming a corporation is (in many cases) a bad idea. But that's not where our hero is: he already has one, and it is already doing something (if not much). Liquidating the corporation will mean that the corporation will owe taxes on the difference between the fair market value of its assets and their basis, and the shareholder will owe taxes on the difference between that amount and his basis in his stock. Even if nothing has increased in value since the corporation was formed, the combined tax due could be large if he had built-in gain on assets he contributed to the corporation, including intangibles, thanks to the "gain duplication" inherent in Section 351.

      Moral of the story: Don't try this at home, kids. Corporations are strictly for tax professionals and other masochists.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    3. Re:Dump the corp by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
      This advice is not precisely true. There are plenty of good reasons to use an LLC, S-Corp or C-Corp. You should either talk to an accountant about it, or read some books yourself before you make that decision.


      For example, with a C corp, you can deduct 100% of your health insurance expenses. Depending on where you live, this can be huge (here in Massachusetts, as a single 23 year old male, mine are about $420 a month for BCBS PPO plan - just imagine with a family... ugh). And an S Corp can be useful because S Corp dividends aren't subject to FICA and FUTA taxes (the 15% "self-employment tax"). This can also be a big hit on the bottom line for a small consulting business (no, you can't dodge all of it, but using S Corp dividends, you can reduce your effective self-employment tax rate substantially below 15%).


      Also, you can take advantage of more complex corporate structures and deductions to avoid taxes - you know, the games that people play in big companies can work for your small business too, if you know what you're doing. I am willing to give advice on the specifics, on a consulting basis. From my experience, you have to have a consulting business bringing in at least 100k-150k gross per year for these hoops to be worth jumping through. If you're bringing in substantially less than that, it's probably not worth the overhead of setting up a corporation.

    4. Re:Dump the corp by mediahacker · · Score: 1
      Bad news: Being a corporation sets you up for a lot more paperwork and hassles

      Good news: If you have a client who thinks you screwed up or somehow cost them $$$, they can sue the corporation but they cannot touch your assets... They can take all of your business stuff but none of your personal stuff (cars, toys, house, etc... ) All it takes is one litigious a-hole to ruin your whole life. Go with the corporation.

    5. Re:Dump the corp by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      If you want to avoid employment taxes, don't bother with an S corporation, where you risk having dividends recharacterized as salary. You want a limited partnership, in which you, as limited partner, receive 100% of profits after a fixed amount to the general partner (which could be a corporation you own). The Code specifies that, in the case of limited partners, payments other than guaranteed payments are not subject to employment tax. (It doesn't define "limited partners," but being one under substantive state law should be reasonably safe.)

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    6. Re:Dump the corp by wcdw · · Score: 1

      One thing I did not see mentioned in this thread -- if you are a single-member LLC, you enjoy the protections inherent in being a corporation, yet you still have the option to file as an S-corp.

      (I recently converted an S-Corp to an LLC, so I'm fairly current on LLC facts and figures. ;)

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're just taking up space!
    7. Re:Dump the corp by timeOday · · Score: 1

      He already said his expenses were "just about 0," so I don't see how there could be any corporation assets to begin with.

    8. Re:Dump the corp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You pay unemployment insurance when you have employees. No law says a corporation has to have employees.

      An LLC would have been better though.

    9. Re:Dump the corp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then when something happens and someone decides to sue "the company", you have no protection. And then you have no house, no car, no retirement, no savings, no kids college fund, nothing.

      Or if you have a business partner, and they end up going crooked, and your business goes under (the classic "No, Fred, I'll take care of the books--you don't worry about that side of the business") then guess who's screwed? YOU!

      Incorporating is a very good idea.

      JD

    10. Re:Dump the corp by humblecoder · · Score: 1

      Actually, this is somewhat of a misnomer. There are certain situations where somebody can go after your personal assets, even if you incorporate:

      1. It's possible to be held personally liable in cases of fraud, malpractice, or negligence, even if you are acting as an agent of the corporation. Even if you are incorporated, you should still carry personal liability insurance that is appropriate to your profession.

      2. If you don't follow all of the proper procedures, it's possible that somebody can "pierce the corporate veil" and go after you personally for business debt.

      3. If you are starting out in business, you may have to guarantee your business loan with a personal guarantee (i.e, your personal assets). In this case your personal stuff could be fair game if your corporation goes under.

  19. You don't have to pay taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone brought this up before:

    I'v heard (rumor and from tax professionals) that if you haven't ever paid taxes before in the past, you dont ever have to pay them. The first time you fill out the tax forms, your commiting to pay in the future. However, if when you came of legal age and knew this, and didnt start paying taxes.. youd never have to pay them. Granted, you'd probably get money back on your first few jobs digging ditches and what nought, but its good forsight for the future..

    1. Re:You don't have to pay taxes? by patmoore · · Score: 1

      Every year there are people who try this... or variations of this. They are the first people that the IRS goes after because the case law is so clearly on the IRS's side.

    2. Re:You don't have to pay taxes? by SoftCoreHonesty · · Score: 1

      I have never worked a job in my life (all the way back to 14 yrs old) that I didn't have at least some income tax deducted from my paycheck. My first filings were to get that money back. Unless you work off the books your whole life then this would never work.

    3. Re:You don't have to pay taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The urban legand is sort of true -- if you live entirely cash-based, the IRS doesn't know about you and will never come after you, unless you are Al Capone or someone notorious. (I know people who lived this way for years, working for tips or driving a cab or whatever and never paying a dime to the govt.) The moment you get a W2 job a or a bank account, however, it's game over.

    4. Re:You don't have to pay taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      bad idea. If you file a tax return, the IRS has 5 (and only 5) years to audit you for that year.


      If you don't file a tax return, the IRS can audit without any statute of limitations.

  20. Are you even on the IRS's Radar? Is it a hobby? by shoppa · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Are you even on the IRS's Radar? i.e. did any businesses send you 1099's at the end of the year? Did you send out any 1099's?


    There is a level of activity below which the IRS will classify your attempt at a business as a "hobby". Having negative income is a prerequisite for this classification. See the IRS publication 535 for details.

  21. Tax tips for small folks by rat7307 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Once this has been answered, howsabout some tax tips for us taller folks????

    --
    Burma?
  22. Learn to read ... by Omicron32 · · Score: 0

    It's getting late and I'm tired... which is why I read the subject as "Sex Tips for Small Folks."

    I thought you were talking about Midget porn... Hell, that stuff ain't funny.

  23. HR Block? by smoondog · · Score: 1

    I know that many don't like HR Block, because it is expensive, the people are ill-informed, etc. I went there one year out of desparation and was pleasently surprised. ~120 bucks for all of my taxes, completely prepared by the accountant, took about 45 minutes, and they dealt with things that, frankly, I can't like consulting income, deducting home business expenses, student loan interest, etc. Might be a nice middle of the road solution for those who don't need to overpay an accountant, but even the online tools seem daunting.

    Be careful, though. They try to get you to sign off on giving away your data to companies that try to sell you things. They don't tell you those forms aren't required, but they really aren't, I didn't sign and they didn't have a problem with it.

    -Sean

    1. Re:HR Block? by fgb · · Score: 1

      I always did my own taxes. After I graduated and my income suddenly increased I found one year that I owed $650 in taxes. It was a shock to me since I was used to getting a refund every year. So I went to H&R Block. After they looked over my taxes they said: you owe the government $650 and you owe us $50. So now I still do my own taxes. I have a small business on the side. TurboTax really helps. I did my taxes in less than three hours this year and spent my refund in February. Between automatic import of W2s and mortgage records it's getting easier every year. And thanks to electronic filing and direct deposit I get my refund pretty quickly. Obviously you still need a tax professional if your situation is more complicated but the niche that was H&R Block's bread and butter no longer exists.

    2. Re:HR Block? by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1

      Since I have some international stock and taxes get somewhat tricky on those (plus I hate doing taxes), I end up going to H+R Block Premium every spring. At the premium office here, everyone I've ran across is a CPA.

      I've been pointed out some great things to know like you can carry capital gains losses over $3k to next year. $3000 is the limit you can claim per year. I had no clue about that 'feature' of the tax code.

      The first year I went to H+R Block, I went to the 'normal' office and the guy had no clue what to do with freaking dividends! He asked me what form I needed for them. So, my experience has been hunt down one of the 'premium' offices in your vincinity. It ended up costing me about $200 this year, but I only had to spend 45 minutes one Saturday morning on it, and I would have ended up dropping $50 on TaxCut and being paranoid about screwing up all year.

  24. Tax Tips for Small Forks? by _PimpDaddy7_ · · Score: 0

    I just woke up from a nap, and upon first reading,
    I thought it read Tax Tips for Small FORKS?
    That's it, no more late night heavy drinking...

    1. Re:Tax Tips for Small Forks? by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

      Nothing better than reading with a Japanese accent!

  25. Tips by namespan · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Call the IRS help line. The first two years that I did contracting work, calling them and asking questions probably added $500 to my return. They were friendly and helpful -- more so than in many interactions I've had with private corps who you'd think would have a greater incentive to keep the customer satisfied. This year I haven't had such great luck talking to them, though. Wonder if that congressional inquiry is wearing off. But you might try calling and asking them for advice.
    2. Tax software. Two years ago I used Turbo Tax for the first time, and it was worthwhile. While I'm glad I slugged through the paper forms and publications for a while so I could understand some things, the software takes a fair bit of the tedium out of things. Some preparers I'm aware of out there seem to simply use tax software to do the lions share of the work.
    3. If you find yourself tangled up even with these helps, it's time to talk to a pro. Use and consider retaining the services of an accountant and/or tax lawyer.
    4. File for an Extension. You're already close to the wire... give yourself more time. If you're sure you own money, make a payment. You can get a refund on it later, and won't have to pay interest and fees on the outstanding balance.

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    1. Re:Tips by bogie · · Score: 1

      "Tax software. Two years ago I used Turbo Tax for the first time, and it was worthwhile."

      Two tips since my future father-in-law is a CPA.

      1) Don't bother with Turbo Tax.

      2) Get an accoutant.

      If you just want to "get your taxes over with" use a tax program. Or if you really really have it all figured out and just want and easy way to enter the numbers, use a tax program. If your like most normal people and just want to save money, hire an expert.

      Most people especially the younger ones who are just starting out as contractors or consultants have no clue as to what is deductable. Good accoutants will minimize your taxable income much better than the average person can.

      They will also do all the hard work for you and worst case you just have to round up the paperwork and answer a few questions.

      You will most likely save enough money to pay for your accoutant and as a bonus not have to deal with hours of figuring it out yourself.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    2. Re:Tips by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

      Call the IRS help line... try calling and asking them for advice.

      Legally they cannot give tax advice, and they will probably tell you that right away. They are only allowed to answer specific questions about the tax code. This is probably due to the fact that they did not create the (nonsensical) U.S. tax code. You can thank Congress for that.

      To get an idea of the quality of those answers, ask the same question of several different IRS representatives (assuming you can get anyone on the phone) in separate calls, and you will probably get different answers. I've never received the same answer twice, and thus gave up trying to get help from them.

    3. Re:Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call the IRS help line. The first two years that I did contracting work, calling them and asking questions probably added $500 to my return. They were friendly and helpful -- more so than in many interactions I've had with private corps who you'd think would have a greater incentive to keep the customer satisfied. This year I haven't had such great luck talking to them, though. Wonder if that congressional inquiry is wearing off. But you might try calling and asking them for advice.

      I one upped this and actually went to the field office and had the IRS do my taxes one year in the middle 90's when I was running a small business. No charge, very helpful, and I not only got everything I should of, they helped me refile for the year before and get an EIC. I'm not sure if they still do this, but they were very helpful then. Of course, I came very early in the tax season, by this point it's probably past the friendly and helpful stage.

  26. Dillemas by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Tax Tips For Small Folks?

    Arrrg, what a dillema. Make a wisecrack about Mini Me filing a Mini "Return"(can he deduct the very non-mini 17" Powerbook?), or make a wisecrack along the lines of 'leave the size of my banana out of it'?

    Oh wait, problem solved :-)

  27. Who gives a fuxx0r by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fricking USA crap. Get global!

  28. No matter how you fill out the form its wrong. by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    IM not kidding. REporters have called up the irs with the exact same question and gotten completely opposite answers. THis way, if the governemt want to get you nailed for taxes, they can always do it. YEah, im paranoid, but im also not making this up.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
    1. Re:No matter how you fill out the form its wrong. by SpotBug · · Score: 1

      REporters have called up the irs with the exact same question and gotten completely opposite answers.

      I'd be willing to bet that the US tax code isn't self-consistent.

      --
      cygnuhchur
    2. Re:No matter how you fill out the form its wrong. by trg83 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even more disturbing is the fact that some of the IRS resources have a disclaimer that if they give you bad advice, you will still be liable for the penalties and consequences involved. I am not making this up.

  29. don't bother to file by infonography · · Score: 1
    I am asuming you got yourself a tax ID number and are getting notices about filing taxes. I too have a corp, I was planning to do great things. Opps, someone stupid got put in charge of the US economy. Just like with his father the economy when to #%@(!

    I don't bother to file even though they send out notices. They used to send them out every three months now they send it out once a year. If your business isn't doing any economic activity it's not going to owe anything. Think of if just like when you where in school. You didn't have an income large enough to tax. If no employer used your social security number to pay you wages they have no record. That Tax ID is the same thing.

    So don't sweat it. If you do however what to start using it to better effect, ask you boss if you can switch to 1099 and have your company (the one you own) pay you much less so you can keep more. That's what you where intending wasn't it?

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    1. Re:don't bother to file by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 1

      I'm with you... As simple as it sounds, the law says you do not have to file if you do not owe a tax.

      Take that advice and run with it.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    2. Re:don't bother to file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think the current President and his administration have anything to do with the success of your business... then it's no wonder you didn't succeed. The fact you seem to have a hard time writing a simple english sentence may have been another factor. Point - to the original poster, beware this individual's advice.

    3. Re:don't bother to file by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shutup you communist asshole

    4. Re:don't bother to file by infonography · · Score: 1
      Ha Ha, I am looking at your IP address on the Anonymous Coward IP database, this allows companies to sue retards like you who think they are posting without revealing their info.

      Oh look, it's an AOL account. Should have know.

      --
      Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
    5. Re:don't bother to file by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Right, you don't have to file, if you don't owe anything. However if the IRS owes you, then you have to file to get your money back.

      I'ave always felt that taxes should be due, in cash on election day. (Not a poll tax, even if you decide not to vote you still have to pay, to avoid crooks I suppose a check will have to do, but with substantial penilties for bounded checks) But few people actually save money, so this is seen as unworkable. (I personall belive that after a couple times of going to jail for not paying taxes on time people will learn to save)

    6. Re:don't bother to file by dvk · · Score: 1

      >>> Opps, someone stupid got put in charge of the US economy.
      >>> Just like with his father the economy when to #%@(!

      Oh, i didn't know Clinton's father had anything to do with economy... you WERE talking about Clinton, werent you? The president that was in office when the current economic downturn started
      (not to mention the president who turned down Sudanese offer to capture Bin Laden, which theoreticlaly could have prevented 9/11 which could have stopped the major recession).

      See, what marxists don't seem to get is that economy takes a while to change due to certain policies. So, the cycle we get is:
      - Respublican inherits shitty economy
      - Respublican does things to fix it
      - Economy looks bad because fixes haven't worked yet
      - Population elects a democrat
      - Democrat benefits from the good economy - caused by policies of the previous Republican and/or simply the economic cycle
      - Democrat doesn't help (or hurts) the economy by increasing spending and taxes
      - Economy doesn't have enough time to tank yet, when Republican gets elected because the population wants someone who doesn't think with his dick
      - Economy tanks thanks to cycle and previous policies
      - Respublican gets blamed by economically clueless liberals like you.

      As for on-topic advice:
      1) Don't ask professional advice on /. unless it's conputer related. You have no way to evaluate which responses are from dumbasses and which from those who know
      2) File. Don't fuck with IRS - they can do things to you. Very, very bad things.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  30. And I thought... by the-banker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And I thought the people that sought legal advice on Slashdot were nuts...

    Asking for tax advice on here is taking it to another level...

    1. Re:And I thought... by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

      And I thought the people that sought legal advice on Slashdot were nuts...
      Asking for tax advice on here is taking it to another level...


      I have this little lump on my leg, under the skin. It doesn't really hurt or anything, but it feels sort of wierd. It's been there for a few months now. It's bigger than a pea, maybe the size of 2 or 3 peas. It isn't really hard, but it's not really soft either, I guess it's sort of firm-ish.

      I was wondering if I should have surgery to have it removed? Is it some sort of tumor? Could it be cancer? Or is it just a harmless bump that will go away? I'd post a photo of it, but my server can't take a slashdotting.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:And I thought... by mattsucks · · Score: 1
  31. I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm self-employed (not corp, just your basic sole proprietor that reports profits on schedule C). I keep an eye on my taxes all year long (since like many self-employed have no withholdings, so I pay quarterly payments to avoid underpayment penalties).

    I fill out the forms myself, by hand, and I usually have my taxes finished in early march. I wait until the last minute to mail em though, seems like a good idea not to stick out of the crowd. Recently I switched to the fill-in PDF forms but I still like the satisfaction of filling out taxes by hand (yes I'm a sick man). Never been audited.

    I'm a little confused how you could just NOW be thinking about taxes. Don't you have books that you keep all year? It should just be a matter of loading up your finance software and putting numbers in the right spots. If you're a corp, you'll need to report your losses as well since you will carry them to the next year, etc.

    If you have NO income and NO expenses, then, well, what the heck are you doing anyway... the IRS might call it a "hobby" and save you some trouble. :-)

    My advice? If you're so tiny you can't afford an accountant, keep an eye on your taxes throughout the year. Learn about the various forms you need, and what's required of you. Hit some message boards that accountants hang out on (like Motley Fool, etc) and ask lots of questions. Don't believe anything you don't hear 3 different times 3 different ways and can verify in the tax code. Example I learned recently: if you make donations of saleable inventory, you can only usually deduct the cost basis, not the fair market value, no matter what your pals at Microsoft tell you. :-)

    I'd also suggest ditching the corp status. Why bother? If you want legal protections, consider forming a limited liability corporation. I've thought it about occasionally but never bothered.

    THIS year however, it's too late to do any of that, GO GET AN ACCOUNTANT. Really. You can't do it yourself over the weekend if you're as clueless as you sound... no offense.

    1. Re:I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you're as clueless as you sound... no offense.

      Man, are you that much of an arse in person?

  32. Get volunteer help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just got back from volunteering here in Chicago We're instructed not to work on "real" business returns, but they do help with Form C-EZ for the 1099-MISC, and if we're not busy, we can plug in numbers in if we have the info in front of us.

    Most of the volunteers are accountants and it's funded in part by the IRS. Unfortunately, the last day was today.. The IRS may be able to refer you to other organizations in your area.. Good Luck!

    If you have spare time, volunteer! You don't have to be a "people person" to crunch numbers. Even a slashdot addict can do it.

  33. Don't get an accountant by jhunsake · · Score: 1

    Just follow one simple rule this year: don't take more money as distributions than as salary.

    It sounds like you didn't have much revenue, and you had net income of around zero, so don't worry about it. They won't spend half a second on your return. And in the highly unlikely chance they do, any penalties are a percent of what you should have paid. n% of ~$0 = ~$0.

  34. Re:Best tax tip of all by miyako · · Score: 1

    I'm sure this was intended as funny, but I really think it deserves a +1 insightful

    --
    Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  35. zero expenses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You definitely need an accountant! I guarantee a good accountant will pay for him/herself with and then some at tax time.

  36. Good Preparer = Invaluable by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Find a good tax preparer -- someone you trust who knows what they are doing. Such a person is worth the money.

    I work with a guy who loves to prepare taxes, he's saved me lots of $$$ and has been an excellent source of financial advice. I get my hundred dollars worth, that's for sure.

    --
    -kgj
  37. You must have SOME deductibles. by SlashChick · · Score: 4, Informative
    I run a small business as well, and though it didn't make an incredible amount last year, I had a lot of startup expenses. If you say you don't have any business expenses, you aren't looking hard enough.

    • Did you perform upgrades to your computer? Is your computer used by you for business purposes? Write the upgrades off! Last year, I wrote off a bunch of stuff, including an Adobe Photoshop 7.0 upgrade, a RAM upgrade, and several other things. I already have a hard drive upgrade to write off for this year.
    • Did you purchase books to better your business knowledge? Deduct them! O'Reilly books count too!
    • Did you travel to a client site? That's 36 cents per mile in your pocket, bud. I travel to client sites 4-5 times a week, so I deduct several thousand miles a year.
    • Did you purchase servers? A router or switch? How about a printer or a scanner? Those are all business expenses.
    • How about your phone bill? DSL or cable modem? Cell phone? If you use them for business, these are all deductible.
    • Did you take a client out to eat or send a client a gift? That's tax-deductible too.
    • Did you donate to the EFF or even to Goodwill? Deduct it!


    This is why you go to an accountant -- because it's never jut a bunch of zeroes. If your business didn't make much money and you didn't either, you're entitled to a refund. Spend the $50 or so to talk to a real person about your business, and take the time to document gas mileage, computer purchases, and monthly bills you can write off. In fact, if you have a room in your house that serves as an office (and only as an office), you can write off a percentage of your rent or mortgage every single month.

    If you didn't know this stuff, it's certainly time to take your money and go straight to a tax preparer. My dad's assistant does tax returns for a living, so I always get her to do mine... but if you don't have a relative who can do them, go find someone who can! A good accountant is invaluable and will teach you the tricks of tax deductions (some of which I have outlined above.) Never underestimate how much money a professional can save you in the long run.
    1. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      How about your phone bill?

      Only your SECOND line, remember...

      Did you donate to the EFF or even to Goodwill? Deduct it!

      If you're a sole proprietor you can't deduct donations as business expenses. You can only report them as itemized deductions.

    2. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by TheSunborn · · Score: 1

      But with zero revenue deductions are not that usefull.

    3. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by patmoore · · Score: 1

      Not true. The deductions can be used against capital gains, or ordinary income from the 9-5 W-2 wages.

    4. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      ...unless of course you actually plan on making money in the coming years. Those deductions can be rolled forward (not sure how many years) and applied in years when you actually do have a net income. I have deductions from two years ago that will benefit me on last year's taxes; I finally managed to make a non-negligible amount of money last year, and it's nice to carry forward those startup expenses to offset it.

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    5. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      But with zero revenue deductions are not that usefull.

      Not so. As a Schedule C business, even if all he has are startup costs, they're still deductible from his personal income, but they must be amortized over 3 (5?) years.
      But realistically, if you have no revenues at all, you'd better have excellent records if you want to prove you're a business.
    6. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      He isn't a sole proprietor that would file on Schedule C, he said he was a C corp. You know, Somecompany Inc, etc... Totally different ball game.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    7. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Not from a C-Corp. C-corps are seperate legal entities.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    8. Re:You must have SOME deductibles. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      you can only right off the percentage that is used for your business.
      If you are an accountant, you can't write off the space on your hard drive used for games.
      If you are using thing that arn't part of your business, you are in for a hewap of trouble. he IRS doesn't audit for one year, it goes way back.

      Of course, if you are a computer consultant, whop is to dsay you won't need to know the gaming industry?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. Go Pro by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is a reason why accountants are highly paid professionals. Find one that is trustworthy (family/friends are helpful here) and then use them.

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
  39. 1040EZ by sstory · · Score: 1

    Get the 1040, and if you have capital gains a Schedule D, from the IRS web site, print it out, follow the easy-to-use directions, and mail it off. Should take less than an hour to do the whole thing.

  40. What an insane statement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about an urban legend. Do you honestly think the government is stupid enough to make paying taxes volentary? Particularly after they went to all the trouble to change the Constitution so that they could have an income tax (Amendment 16).

  41. Switch from normal to ritual murder by sam_handelman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Firstly, if you gruesomely eviscerate your victims for religious purposes (instead of just on a whim) you can be a religion. You need at least three accomplices, if I recall correctly, to serve as treasurer and suchnot. If they complain on "principled" grounds about your savage murders of children, point out the tax benefits this accrues for them. This tactic works best on MBAs.

    Secondly, remember to keep the children alive in cages for months in your basement. This way, you can claim them as dependents. ALSO, your house becomes a business expense.

    Finally, you'll want to sell a few "insurance policies" to small farmers*. I recommend collaborating with your local Mafia Don in this, since farmers generally don't want to buy insurance from serial killers, and since the Mafia can help with the fundamentally cash-poor nature of ritually murdering children lured over the internet, which is of course a fine and laudible goal but still lacks an effective "business model."

    * This is an actual tax loophole. If your primary business is selling insurance policies to farmers, and you meet some other requirements, you don't have to pay federal taxes. Recently this loophole has been heavily abused, but I can't find the reference. Anyone?

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:Switch from normal to ritual murder by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      * This is an actual tax loophole. If your primary business is selling insurance policies to farmers, and you meet some other requirements, you don't have to pay federal taxes. Recently this loophole has been heavily abused, but I can't find the reference. Anyone?

      I assume you are talking about section 501(c)(17). But it's not only for insurance sold to farmers, it's for all very small (<$350,000 premiums/year) nonlife insurance companies.

      There are many other farm-specific tax breaks, of course.

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
  42. How inconsiderate by MoonBuggy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Tax Tips For Small Folks?

    The term they prefer is vertically challenged. ;-)

  43. Tax software by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A friend of mine is a lawyer who also attended post-law school tax school (grad school for lawyers?).

    He swears by tax programs for ordinary people's taxes and says they generally do a good job, although there are places where hand-tuning can help.

    The analogy he made was programming -- tax software is like a high level language. It's great for most stuff, although there are places where hand-tuned assembly can help, and some places where its necessary.

    1. Re:Tax software by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree. I used the Turbo Tax online software this year and it was a breeze. My situation isn't complicated(1 job, student loans, some interest income/stocks) and having TT fill out all the forms and then electronically file was simple.

      For most people some software will do everything they need.

  44. Resources by randLews_Therin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I would suggest visiting the National Society of Enrolled Agents which has references to local society's in all fifty states and tax professionals there in. Alot of these society's have professionals who almost strictly deal with small business returns and would probably be willing to give you a free consultation. The Colorado society of Enrolled Agents site may also be useful, which on the left hand bar has a couple of other useful tax site links.

  45. Use Tax Software by I-R-Baboon · · Score: 1

    If you are even slightly serious about your business invest in some cost management and tracking software and tax software such as QuickBooks and TurboTax.

    Or you could try filing online with TurboTax.

    --
    -1 Overrated (Too many big words for me to comprehend)
  46. Advice by tdemark · · Score: 1

    First, Federal Corporate taxes are due on March 15th, not April 15th. I can't vouch for other states, but PA Corporate Taxes are due 30 days thereafter.

    Regardless, do the following:

    Go get form 1120-A from the IRS. Fill out the block with your corporate name and address. Fill out Box B and C. Assuming your started out with nothing last year and had a net loss, put "0" on D.

    Put your revenue in 1c and 11. Put your expenses in 22. Subtract 22 from 11 and put in 24. If you had a net loss, 25c will be 0 and 26 will be the same as 24. 28, 29, 30 should be 0.

    Fill out Part II.

    On a separate sheet, type the following:
    -----------------
    Your_Corporate_Name
    EIN: Your_EIN_Number

    Form 1120A, Part II, Question 2

    Your_Name Your_SSN
    -----------------

    On another separate sheet:
    -------------
    Your_Corporate_Name
    EIN
    F YE 12/31/2002

    Internet Service 5,000
    Equipment Lease 4,000
    Travel and Entertain 500
    .
    .
    .
    Total Other Deductions 14,500
    (THIS IS AN EXAMPLE IS MADE UP NUMBERS, PUT YOUR OWN STUFF IN)

    Other Information:

    Your_Name 100% Ownership of Voting Stock

    ----------

    Sign, copy, and submit these forms. Given that you don't owe anything, they'll probably leave you alone.

    Next year, get these forms done in time and get an accountant.

    - Tony

  47. Remember: by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 0

    THe KYjelly is deductable as a medical expense.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  48. Little People? by blakespot · · Score: 1
    Tax Tips For Small Folks?

    "Little people" (let's be politically correct, why don't we we) are subject to the same tax trails and tribulations as the rest of us. No more -- no less. Let's not act as though they are any less human.


    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
    1. Re:Little People? by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      The current 'politically correct' phrase of "little people" is so completely asinine that I can't believe no has been shot over it yet. Let's be medically acurate, adult humans that are under a certain height are midgets or dwarfs. The distinction between the two has to do with body proportions, because the genetic anamoly that cause either condition affect parts of the body differently.

      "Little people" as a group would include all children, up to about the age of 10, and many teenagers as well. It's not like the term "little children" is referring to midgets and dwarfs who are under the age of 10.

      OK, that's my rant for the day. Thanks.

  49. File A Zero Return by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's possible to file a 'zero return' with both the state and feds (check with your state tax laws). Depending on your state it's possible to file both online. You can file a zero return when there is no profit made, or when your expenses exceed your income. It should be fairly inexpensive to have a CPA prepare a zero return. It's still possible to do it on your own though. It usully requires filling out only one or two forms, sticking zeros in just about every line. My state's web site has a great section for small businesses that describe federal and state tax requirements. You might want to start looking on your state's web site.

  50. You're too late... by gregm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The deadline for C-Corps was March 31. IANAA but I am the IT guy at a CPA firm and I must say they do know their stuff and are worth every penny. You should get an accountant for at least the first few years... later on when you understand what has to be filed and how they should look you might be ok doing it yourself. Same with sales tax payroll etc... none of it is all that difficult unless you've got bookoo bucks and need to find the loopholes.

    There aren't many loopholes (probably none) that will be able to be used for the common person or small business. H&R Block, your bank etc. are not the way to go, BTW. Go to a CPA firm, heck you'd have a better chance getting decent work done at Fred's Accounting than at any of the fly-by we do taxes only places. Your bank and regular tax places have one lowly person sitting in the office for 9 months out of the year... when tax season hits they get temps, college kids studying accounting and anyone else they can find to crank out taxes. Most accounting firms are fully staffed all year with competent people and they might hire a temp or two to help out with the phones or do filing etc.

    Not filing and not filing on time will get you massive penalties so don't screw around, call a CPA right after April 15. Ask the CPA if any penalties you might have already incurred will outweigh the value of your corp. You may be able to abandon the corp and just start over.

    While I'm on the subject.... the urban myth says if you have an inc., you're personal stuff is protected, Incorporating doesn't do squat for your personal risk until it is able to establish it's own credit rating, many years down the road. No bank will lend a newly formed, poor corp. any money without a personal guarantee the loan will be paid off.... i.e. your house as collateral. There are other disadvantages like paying tax on your inventory etc that make a C-corp less attractive, especially at the start.

    Of course I could be wrong about everything.

    G

    1. Re:You're too late... by certsoft · · Score: 1
      The deadline for C-Corps was March 31

      Depends on what his fiscal year is, C-Corps aren't required to use a calender year.

    2. Re:You're too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm on the subject.... the urban myth says if you have an inc., you're personal stuff is protected, Incorporating doesn't do squat for your personal risk until it is able to establish it's own credit rating, many years down the road. No bank will lend a newly formed, poor corp. any money without a personal guarantee the loan will be paid off.... i.e. your house as collateral. There are other disadvantages like paying tax on your inventory etc that make a C-corp less attractive, especially at the start.

      For loans and credit, you are correct. For lawsuits becoming incorporated makes sense. Being in the tech sector in this age of the contemptably inept USPTO, becoming incorporated - or forming a LLC (my choice) - makes a hell of a lot of sense. Of course if it can be proven that you planned to break the law, even that won't help you.

    3. Re:You're too late... by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      I thought it was April 31st until I realized, "Wait a second, April doesn't have 31 days!" Then I remembered that 2003 is a leap year, so I am all good.

      --Joey

    4. Re:You're too late... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      loopholes? Sheesh, y'all have C type corps and double taxation problems. Why not look into modifying to s type, keeping the liability protection but gaining flow through taxation and saving yourself at a minimum the social security tax type stuff. But then, that's a solution for next year. For this year, get an accountant, pay for the accountant, and the accountant will pay for himself, especially since you're late.

      As far as your personal stuff being protected and liability, the idea is not about credit, it's about what's on the block when your corp. gets sued (i.e. a client slips on a banana peel, or you back into his new BMW as you leave the building). If you're a sole proprietorship, when your business gets sued, the verdict can go after not just the assets of your business, but your personal assets. When you're a corp. and you keep your accounts separate, people who sue can only go after the assets in the corp, not your personal comic book collection. This is another good reason to have an accountant - to help you establish a good bookkeeping method that will bolster your claim that the corporation is a separate entity.

    5. Re:You're too late... by GiMP · · Score: 1

      2003 cannot be a leap year, it is an odd numbered year. One rule about leap years is that they must be an even numbered year.

      Besides, April isn't any longer in a leap year.

    6. Re:You're too late... by sambira · · Score: 1

      Hey, my uncle is Fred and he does accounting. What you talkin bout, WIllis?

    7. Re:You're too late... by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      I know, um it was supposed to be a joke.

      Oh well, I failed miserably....

      --Joey

  51. Re:Are you even on the IRS's Radar? Is it a hobby? by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    There is a level of activity below which the IRS will classify your attempt at a business as a "hobby".

    Sorry but I thought that it doesn't matter on the profit, but it does matter on how much money you turn.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  52. h&r block advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've used H&R Block for the last few years. Nothing major has changed in my life this last year, so I just refer to the past years' returns to see how the expert filled it in, and just replace with my current year's numbers. I still read the instructions, but knowing what applies and what I can skip is a great time-saving tip.
    Also saves on going to H&R Block every year. If a lot changes in your tax situation, go back to H&R Block, let them sweat it, and then use their return as a template for the year after. Lather, rinse, and repeat.

  53. Re:Are you even on the IRS's Radar? Is it a hobby? by inbox · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unless I'm missing some huge loophole, it's not a hobby if he told the IRS (and countless other local and state agencies) that he wanted to create a C-Corp, regardless of revenue, which is what should have happened when he created the corporation (all kinds of paper work needs to be filed like articles of incorporation, etc...).

    There are all kinds of fees, dues and taxes that get paid out to multiple groups (IRS, state department of labor, city government, etc....) at various times during the year just by having a corporation, regardless of revenue. Having employees, etc... obviously complicates this, and often the officers of the company are also employees and there are legal guidelines for this as well.

    It's actually a pretty good reason not to start a corporation when another business entity would have been far more appropriate. The IRS is not the only agency one has to deal with and there are very specific rules, guidelines and laws surrounding the operation of a corporation.

    Unfortunately, having a corporation that makes no money is not free.

  54. TurboTax Web by cmeans · · Score: 1
    Well, OK...you've waited this late to ask a question like this, so, no answer is going to be a panacea, but take a look at TurboTax Web. My wife and I used them this year, and in years past. (Though not last year...) There are a number of options as to how much help you want (which translates into how much money you're willing to spend), but I think it's worth it for someone in a small business (my wife teaches Jazzercise, so she's a Schedule C).

    Plus, you don't spend a penny unless you print or file.

    TurboTax isn't a good substitute for a real tax person, but it's probably way better than you trying to fillout the paper forms yourself.

    1. Re:TurboTax Web by cybin · · Score: 1

      i definetly agree -- we had an accountant do our partnership taxes, but since we are a partnership we are responsible for the tax burden of the business income. turbotax on the web will let you enter in a Schedule K-1 for yourself, which if you are the only owner of the small business, you can use to list additional income (even if it's zero).

      so, if you are the company, and just you, you put your small biz stuff on your 1040. if they're zeroes, you don't have much to worry about.

    2. Re:TurboTax Web by AssFace · · Score: 1

      I have used the web version of Turbo Tax in the past and used it this year as well.
      I filled it out as soon as I had all of my forms - at least a month early and perhaps more.
      I owed over $600 and decided that I would then wait it out until closer to the deadline, might as well gain some more interest off of my money.
      My information was already in TurboTax, so I just left it there and it would still be there when I came back.
      I then went back to it a few days ago and flipped through the info, double checking that I had entered it all correctly.
      Then I went ahead and followed through with it and oops, TurboTax raises the prices the closer it gets to the deadline.
      If you file early, the fees are X price, if you wait until a week before, they are 2X - and perhaps even more the closer you get.

      part of me wanted to be angry about that, and part of me wanted to pat someone on the back for the good idea.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  55. do your employees know by jd142 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That you are asking for tax advice on Slashdot because you are too cheap to get a decent accountant? If I found out the business I was working for or doing business with was getting its advice from the chowderheads here, I would be out the door so fast Einstein would spin in his grave.

    The only good advice you'll see on this board is to fork over the money and do it right: get an accountant.

    Yeah, I know this is a snarky comment, but please, this question begged for it.

  56. My $0.02. by astro · · Score: 1

    1. Don't say "don't ask" re: the c-corp decision - it has a big impact. Filing as an LLC (in some states) pushes all the tax burden to your normal personal taxes.

    2. Dude, go to the accountant. Spend the $200 or whatever - you'll breathe easier. It's not worth the stress in the low-dollar situation you describe.

    3. As others have pointed out, if you really took in less than say 5k and spent the same, the IRS doesn't care, explicitly and literally.

  57. how doy you know your expenses are at $0? by patmoore · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have a legimate business (i.e. you are intending to make a profit at some point and you put in a significant amount of hours (>100) a year) there is a whole raft of stuff you can take off the tax bill. Phone calls, internet usage, depreciation on your computer, mileage, etc. Spend the money and find an accountant who will take the time to educate you on the basics of what you need to know. Don't skimp but you should get be able to get the information you need for about $500. (which by the way can be deducted.) My wife is an accountant and she is really the one to answer this -but you should get the idea.

  58. Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IRS goes over the late returns with a fine-tooth comb. I got nailed for 2 grand.

  59. Just follow this code... by dotgod · · Score: 1
    if(!overhead && !profit)
    you_have_a_business==FALSE;
    1. Re:Just follow this code... by deanj · · Score: 1

      syntax error in line 2

    2. Re:Just follow this code... by deanj · · Score: 1

      Er, make that a logic error. doh! :-)

    3. Re:Just follow this code... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it didn't work, here's my code:

      [user@host user]$ cat bus.c
      #include

      int main(int argc, char **argv)
      {
      if(!overhead && !profit)
      you_have_a_business==FALSE;
      }
      [user@host user]$ gcc -Wall bus.c
      bus.c: In fuction `main':
      bus.c:6: warning: statement with no effect

  60. LKF by geekoid · · Score: 1

    actualkly, you are obligated, by law, to pay taxes on all income.
    The IRS does not report how you got that money.
    According to a former top official of the IRS, it would be both against reulations, and quite frankly, not practical to turn that info over to the Feds.
    The IRS want to collect your money, they do not care how you get it.
    If they can't [rove you got 1,000,000 dollars through an illegal axctivity,even if they know it, the feds will report that info to the IRS. Then you go to jail for tax evasion.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:LKF by ultraexactzz · · Score: 1

      Interestingly enough, this is a true story. Former Rep. James Traficant (D-Ohio, late of Federal Prison) was acquitted in 1982 of taking bribes as a county sherrif. The IRS then charged him with evading taxes on the bribes he legally didn't take. They don't care where the funds come from - they just want their cut.

      --
      Never underestimate the potential of Human stupidity. -Heinlein
  61. Tax Tip: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Expatriate to somewhere else with a lower tax rate so you don't have to pay tax in your country of citizenship.

    Unless you are American, in which case you government expects you to pay taxes regardless of where you actually live in the universe. You do get a reasonable exemption if you are non resident.. but if yo make a few million, you owe uncle Sam.

    Other countries have this practice as well... China, N. Korea, and Iraq being some main examples.

    The EU countries, Mexico, Canada, Russia, Japan, Australia, and pretty much everyone else aside form a few dictatorships don't tax their citizens unless they are resident.

  62. if you make no money, pay none by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Just write a note on the side, I made no money.
    I did that for 5 years and it was cool.

  63. Information on tax laws and regulations by bahadur · · Score: 1

    This may be of interest to those of you who have an open mind and are willing to come to an informed opinion based on a clear understanding of the IRS's own regulations and tax codes.

    http://www.taxableincome.net/

    If you are unwilling to read through the information there and instead would like to dismiss it offhand, please don't even bother to respond.

  64. Second step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    2. Get rid of open source business model

    and of course...

    3. Profit!!!

  65. Re:TurboTax Web - beware Intuit's access mgmnt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Ever since Intuit screwed customers with their software-disabling ininstallable access management silliness, I won't go anywhere near them. If they're willing to put clandestine software onto the computers of paying customers and try to lie about it, I'm not full of warm fuzzies about their attitude towards my privacy and security if I connect to their web site.

    You can read about Intuit being sued here

  66. In the UK by aking137 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You said you were in the USA, so this is of no help to you, but could be for others in the UK.

    Over here, as just about everybody knows, the official tax-collecting body are the Inland Revenue. As it happens, they have an official web site: http://www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk.

    If you go to the site, click on 'Individuals' (left panel), scroll down and click 'Self Assessment' (under features), and then scroll down again and click 'Self Employed'.

    A few key points (No warranty - I'm an amateur - check these for yourself rather than relying on a random slashdotter if you're going to use any of this):

    - You need to fill in the form which can be accessed at http://www.inlandrevenue.gov.uk/startingup/selfemp l.htm within around three months of starting being self employed.

    - You'll have to keep records of all your income and expenses, including all receipts of expenses wherever possible.

    - Anything you declare as expenses isn't taxable. So if you bring in £20,000 and justify £5,000 on expenses, you'll be taxed on the remaining £15,000.

    - You'll probably have to pay two lots of National Insurance: one currently at £2/week, and the other at 7% of everything you earn between around £5,000pa and £29,000pa.

    - Tax rates are roughly:

    10% of your first £2,000pa. ("Starting Rate")
    22% of your next £27,000pa. ("Basic Rate")
    40% of anything above that ("Higher Rate")

    - You'll have to fill in a self assessment form for every tax year, after the year is complete. Tax years run from April to April. For the tax year ending in April 2003, you can expect to receive your tax return for that year in April 2003, and you'll have until 30th September 2003 or 31st January 2004 to return it, filled in. If you send it in for the first deadline, the IR will calculate your tax for you.

    - Once the tax return is processed, you'll be sent a bill for the amount of tax to pay.

    - Tax returns can be filled in online at the Inland Revenue site.

  67. Tax Tip.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you use turbo tax for the web, it will ask you for small biz tax info. You shouldn't have any issue unless you incorporated. If you registered as a sole prop just answer the correct questions on your individual tax form in TT. If you didn't register at all, then just answer the same questions. If you reged as a corporation or LLC, then I don't have any answers.

    The real issue comes with state sales tax. In Ohio, if you made over x amount of money, you have to be regged and licensed. You must fill in a sales tax form at least every 6 months after you are licensed and report what you made, then fork over 5%.

    (insert standard non tax whiz disclaimer here)

  68. Taxes by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1

    Well, you're already late. For Corps the due date is March 15th, not April 15th. For the Feds, go to the IRS website and get the fill-in PDF for the taxes. It's fairly simple and only takes a couple of hours to do. Basically you enter zeroes for most stuff. If you're in CA, you have to pay the Alternative Minimum Tax, which is an $800.00 kickback you pay to the state for having a corp. You pay AMT if you have less than $800.00 in taxes, otherwise you just pay your tax amount.
    The federal form is 1120, the state form in 940 IIRC.

    I too have a corp (S-corp) that made 0 income last year. You also had to file a tax return with the State board of equalization by 1/31 if you had a reseller's permit. If you have inventory in stock, it defers to the year you sell those goods.

    You'll also get a query from the IRS on wages that were paid, and how much taxes you paid on that. You'll also get a query about principal stock interest in the company, if it changed from the prior filing year.

  69. I agree - get an accountant. by Deal-a-Neil · · Score: 1

    There's no good way around it. Get all of your stuff done right now, because surely, you don't plan on being a zero-revenue company forever. And when the time comes for employees, you might as well have a good working relationship with an accountant so he/she can be sure to get your things in line... payroll taxes, estimated taxes, etc.

    For a simple company having your books and taxes done should be around a few hundred bucks.

    And as for skipping the lawyers.. here here.

  70. Correction by dotgod · · Score: 1
    Line 2 should read
    you_have_a_business=FALSE;
    Geez...calm down guys.
    1. Re:Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny thing is my friend just spent about 20 hours debugging his code because of the same error. guess open source work on his school project code would have saved lots of time?

  71. Ask for an experienced preparer by alispguru · · Score: 2

    My wife has done taxes for H&R Block seasonally for the past eight years, so I know something of what I say here. If your tax situation is at all funky, when you go to H&R Block, ask to see an experienced preparer.

    The vast majority of Block workers only work for them during tax season (January 1 - April 15), and the vast majority of them have been with the company two years or less. The tax code isn't like programming - it's internally inconsistent, because of the patch-it-and-try-again way it gets built. The only way to know what the IRS will accept is to have seen it before, and that takes experience.

    BTW, this is also a reason to go to a tax wizard rather than an accountant. Accountants know a lot about designing systems that reflect financial reality - unfortunately this knowledge is a liability when doing taxes because you try to make the regulations make sense, and they don't

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Ask for an experienced preparer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want someone like my mother to do them.

      She has only worked for them from January 1st to April 15th for the past two years. Before that most of her professional life was spent doing books for large corporations. Taxes and such.

      Now at H&R Block she has people who want only her to do their taxes. People who will drive clear across town just so that she will do them instead of some other person.

    2. Re:Ask for an experienced preparer by Eneff · · Score: 1

      She probably works in an H&R Block Premium office.

      All corporate stuff is handled through there.

      (BTW, I was a former H&R Blockhead. However, I was a Blockhead techie, not a preparer...)

  72. Biggest tip of all by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Send it certified mail.
    I mailed in my forms in late February and haven't gotten my Federal refund back yet. I'm biting my nails wondering if my forms even got there at all.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Biggest tip of all by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Hey, I just found that the IRS website has a "check the status of my refund" page. Yes, it's on the way. (WHEW!)

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  73. Filing the 1040 is an adhesion contract! Don't! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1040 grants the I.R.S a fiduciary relationship with your TRUST.

    I suggest don't file, at all. If you already did, send IRS form 56 to terminate the fiduciary relationship with yout trust.

    EOF

  74. Explain "Form 56" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explain Form 56.
    Yes, please explain this post also.

  75. It's very simple by brundlefly · · Score: 2, Informative

    1. File an extension, so you can legally postpone your tax return filing beyond April 15th. You can download one in PDF form from the IRS and you can even telephone it in. The extension form takes less than 2 minutes to complete.

    2. Talk to a tax accountant. It will cost you anywhere from $100-$500 and it can save you upwards of $1000. The first year I used one I saved myself $1400 over what I had computed for myself. The next year, benefitting from the free advice he had given me the first year, I saved over $5k. After that $11k, and so on.

    3. They are not just there to fill in the form for you. They will also tell you what to do to save money, both on your current return and your future ones. In my experience, and the experience of people I know in our situation, it is very rare that the accountant costs you more than they save you. Think of them as a free money, that should be incentive enough to get you moving.

    4. Don't use the corporate chain accountants. Talk with the old greybeard who has been an independant his whole life. This is very important. Get a referral, use the yellow pages, but do not go to H&R Block. Granted, the solo tax guy is swamped at this time of year, and you are too late to see him now before April 15th, but that is what step #1 is all about. He has plenty of time to help you out between 4/15 and 7/15.

    1. Re:It's very simple by testpoint · · Score: 1

      File an extension, so you can legally postpone your tax return filing beyond April 15th
      You can legally postpone filing but you can't postpone paying the tax.

      You can't pay the tax (accurately) unless you do the work necessary to file. Either way you're screwed.

  76. accountant by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    yes, get an accountant. You have a c-corp, and you really, REALLY need to use an accountant. Your c-corp, and probably (IANAA) write off the cost on the next tax cycle.

  77. Zero expenses and zero revenues: DON'T FILE! by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Informative

    Look, if you had practically zero revenues offset by practically zero expenses, don't even file schedule C and schedule SE.

    I make my living completely by estimated tax payments through the year along with schedule C, forms 4562 and 8829, and schedule SE. But if all you did was on the side and resulted in no profit, the IRS won't give a flying fuck.

    Unless a client of yours sends you a 1099.

    And I hate to sound like a character from Gilliam's Brazil, but a 1099 establishes a paper trail, and then the IRS will want to know why you didn't make an estimated tax payment on that income.

    That leads to all sorts of ugly things like the annualized installement method on form 2210 which is complex but approachable with a spreadsheet program.

    The upshot is, don't bother if you're not on even IRS's radar (which is like under $600 for most contractor/client relatioships). If you are on the radar, then do all the section 179 deductions you can for your tangible property (computers, etc.) on form 4562, do business expense of your home on form 8829, and, of course, do schedule C for profit/loss and schedule SE for self-employment tax.

    And this year, start doing esitmated tax payments using form 1040-ES . Remember they're due four times a year (4.15, 6.15, 9.15, and 1.15 of the next year). The IRS likes to see the amount of each payment be the same and if they're not (because your income through self-employement throughout the year is not the same) then file form 2210 (underpayment) even if you didn't underpay. It's basically where you get to explain why your payments aren't the same throughout the year.

    Finally, don't give H&R Block the time-of-day. If you can follow instructions, add, subtract, multiply, and divide, and, most importantly, be patient, you can file your own taxes. I used to pay a professional to fill out mime. Problem was, I filled them out ahead of time to see if we got the same answers. We did. After that, I said "Fuck you H, fuck you R, and most certainly fuck your Block!" It really is not that hard to file income tax.

    And never forget: IRS sucks.

    1. Re:Zero expenses and zero revenues: DON'T FILE! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Um, no. Just get TaxCut (not Turbo Tax, this year :-( )

      Fill in the Sched C forms. no problem

      I have done this for years with no problems, and no quarterly filing hassle. Just make sure you are close to the correct withholding (See your HR person if you have a "real" job to do extra withholding if you need it.)

      My wife has make 15-20K/yr Sched C, and I am 0-20K sched C side jobs. I never file quarterly and always come out OK, tax-wise. I was out of work (real-job-wise) for much of last year. No problems.

      It took me less than 2 hrs to do 4 tax returns with TaxCut (I got my pre-paid $$ back from Intuit on TurboTax, didn't want to potentially ice my complex multiboot system.)

      The 4 returns were 2 kids, 1 father-in-law, plus my joint return including 2 sched C biz (me an my wife).

      chill, peace-out.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    2. Re:Zero expenses and zero revenues: DON'T FILE! by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

      YMMV, apparently.

    3. Re:Zero expenses and zero revenues: DON'T FILE! by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      He needs to file because he is a C-corp. For his individual taxes, he can do them himself with little fear of liability (so long as he doesn't try any iffy deductions). However, with the C-corp, he needs to file (and is late unless he can use a different calendar year, yet another reason to hire an accountant). The accountant fees are another cost that he can carryover as a loss against revenue in future years.

  78. Certified Mail? No! by Loundry · · Score: 1

    If you're concerned about it getting there, send it UPS or FedEx. Both offer guaranteed service. There is no service offered by the USPS which carries the same guarantee on all of UPS's services (both air and ground) and all of FedEx's air services.

    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  79. Don't wait til the last minute by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Don't wait til now to do taxes. If you run your own business you should have everything you need to do your taxes without having to wait for anything to be mailed to you.

    I've been using TaxCut for the last few years for my personal taxes and this year was the first time I used it for my business. It made it real easy. I just needed to know how much I made (zero) and how much my expenses were (~400). Next year I'll have earnings and expenses to put in.

    The rest was handled by the program. Just keep good records of what's comming in and what's going out and you should be fine. I tend to have all my taxes done the day the last W2 comes in.

    Ben

  80. I must agree by lost+sheep · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a small business owner, and son of accountants, I must agree that you need an accountant. In fact, I was discussing this the other with a few local businessmen the other day. Accounts are vital not only because they know where to put the zero's on your forms, but they also know things like the filing date (not April 15) for businesses. They also know how to approach write-offs and tax credits so that you can not only avoid paying excess taxes now, but in the future (you knew you could write off past tax losses right?). And if you find a good one, they won't charge you too much, especially if your form is as easy as you claim. Some tips (at least from my experience): 1.) don't get an accountant that has television or radio ads, they charge too much. 2.) Don't use H and R Block (they don't help you with write offs so that when you get your refund it looks bigger). 3.) If your taxes aren't a lot of work, find a small one or two person shop, make sure they've been licensed and around for a while. There are several good, cheap accountants in any city. Go to the Chamber of Commerce, look some up, ask them about their rates. If they quote an hourly figure for "consultation" they're probably too expensive. Finally, if you provide a valuable product or service, some small accountants are willing to barter. I know this sounds crazy, but I know several, good and experienced accountants that trade their services for things like computer repair and help, construction work, dental care, etc. So if you can help them, they can certainly help you.

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Lost Sheep to Shepard, you got your ears on?
  81. It's about liability you dork by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    don't dump the incorporation, just get the right kind. an LLC would likely be better. you can choose to be taxed as a C corp or taxed pass through to yourself.

    The corp or llc protects you from the liability, which in the most litigious country in the world is no small thing. You automatically have certain liablities just by having a business. Premises liablity for one.

    by the way, i both give tax advice and am a licensed property and casualty agent.

  82. $24,278,000 != $0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://biz.yahoo.com/fin/l/r/rhat.html is not a bad financial for a new millenial tech firm. In fact, looking at the bottom line, I see a profit.

    1. Re:$24,278,000 != $0 by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 1


      http://biz.yahoo.com/fin/l/r/rhat.html [yahoo.com] is not a bad financial for a new millenial tech firm. In fact, looking at the bottom line, I see a profit.

      Sure they made a profit. They have cut costs dramatically and they still have several hundred million dollars sitting in the bank accruing interest.

      The dirty little secret is that Red Hat is still losing money on an operating basis. That $200 thou they made last quarter is peanuts compared to the $3 million in investment income.

      So yes, Red Hat is a (barely) successful financial services company, but they still aren't making money selling software and support.

      -a

  83. HR Block Tax Software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TaxCut Platinum Home & Business 2002 Federal Filing Edition: All the forms you need! Including 1040, 1120, 1120S, 1065, 941, 1041 and 990

    http://store.taxcut.com/dr/sat/ec_MAIN.Entry17c? CI D=68759&SID=33195&SP=10007&PN=5&PID=473108&DSP=&CU R=840&PGRP=0&CACHE_ID=68759

    Then get the TaxCut State Business for your particular state.

  84. C corps don't get 1099's by TaraByte · · Score: 0

    AFAIK (I'm not an accountant), when someone pays a C corp, they just cut the company a check. it is then up to the corp to take care of it's own taxes.

    As for the original post, I wish I had more answers for you, I am actually in the same boat, myself.

    --
    Security is inversely proportional to the commitment of one desiring to circumvent it.
  85. OMFG by t0ny · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Ask Slashdot with yet another stupid, inane question.

    Ok, Assnozzle, here is the answer to your question- Do your taxes yourself! Wow, since you state they are pretty much all zeroes, lots of people tend to pick up a pen and write them zeroes in -all on their own-!!!!

    Doing something for yourself, what an amazing concept. And also, if you are all into using computer assistance, there are all kinds of Tax Software!!! Wow, what an amazing world we live in!!

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  86. Tax Software by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    My only peice of advise on taxes:

    1) Pay them.
    2) Use tax software

    Doing #1 avoids lots of expensive and time consuming issues like jail and fines. Using #2 saves lots of time.

    $G

    --
    -- $G
  87. Better solution by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Post twice
    hope both get modded to +5 funny
    Karma Profit!!!

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. Re:Advice by geekoid · · Score: 1

    actually, it depends on how the companies year is set up. first of the year for a company does not have to be Jan 1st.
    Second, taxes should be done quarterly. If you are self employed, it makes sense to satart on a quarter that coiniside on april 15th. that way you only pay taxes 4 time instead of 5. it works out the same, its just easier.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  89. what I do by squarefish · · Score: 1

    I happen to have a friend that's an accountant and also a complete idiot about computers, so I offer him tech support, which he rarely needs/uses, and in exchange he does my taxes for me every year. their very complicated, but I don't have to worry about them any more.

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.
  90. Re:Fix the flag! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it is offtopic, but who am I supposed to tell?

    My emails have been ignored and it's such a simple thing to fix I'd hoped that posting it here would raise some awareness.

    Sheesh.

  91. Local IRS office by Grrreat · · Score: 1

    The local office will assist you through the forms, why pay for it, especially if you have the time. My local office wasn't terribly busy when I went by there last. ;-)

  92. You might be late. by tangsc · · Score: 1


    Actually it was March 17th (15th fell on a saturday). This assumes your fiscal year is a calendar year. If it isn't, you need to file 45 days after the end of your fiscal year.
    This a link to the IRS Calendar for March, 2003.
    http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article /0,,id= 104738,00.html

    Plus, you if you owe money, you need to submit payment to a certified depositary bank. You usually need to be a customer of the bank for them to accept.

  93. One more thing by tangsc · · Score: 1

    Even you didn't have any revenue for the year, you still might have to pay mininum taxes. For example in NYC, you need to pay like 300 dollars for NYC, MTA(beiing in or around NYC) - 55 and another 100 to the state.

  94. Profit 3 out of 5 years is BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can lose your shirt every year for as many years as your money holds out.
    You must just meet several requirements to be considered an ongoing concern:
    1. Keep the business funds separate from personal funds. (Separate bank accounts)
    2. Advertise

    Can't rememer the rest cause I'm not a CPA.
    Get an accountant!!!! Consult with them regularily!!!!!

  95. If you own a C or S corp... by dentar · · Score: 2, Informative

    always hire a professional.. not one of these H&R block creeps either.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
  96. the fourty billion dollar question. by twitter · · Score: 1
    I am one of the richest corporations in the USA, have excellent proffits but pay no dividens.

    What's the question?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  97. That's really bad advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IRS can seize your assets and throw your ass in jail. You can try to fight them legally, but without any assets, good luck hiring a leech, er, lawyer. And if you think for a moment that a Federal judge is going to rule in your favor, you're profoundly deluded. David Koresh was a tax protestor, that's what Waco was really about. Never, ever fuck with the IRS. Just send them the money. They're too scary, and they always win.

    1. Re:That's really bad advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      re: David Koresh


      My understanding is that the BATF discovered Koresh/Branch Davidians were in possession of 2 (handmade) machine guns. They are not illegal per se, but do require a $50/yearly tax, which wasn't being paid.


      Clinton/Reno/BATF royally fucked up, and had to claim child abuse, drug dealing, etc.


      It's sad that people would protest a war in Iraq, but say nothing when some "religious nuts" got burnt alive (and the survivors arrested).

  98. Tax tip? Don't use Turbotax. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between onerous eulas, questionable tracking practices, and an installer that keeps dying with the amazingly descriptive error of "product installation not complete" I'm tearing my frickin' hair out.

    Next year I'm using somethign else. It may well be a slide rule, but fuck 'em. Those bastards at Intuit have recieved the last dollar they'll ever get from me.

  99. IRS Free File Alliance by vocaro · · Score: 1
    A couple of years ago, the IRS was going to create its own online tax program allowing anyone to file their taxes electronically at irs.gov for free. That caused a panic among companies like Intuit and H&R Block who were already trying to make a profit from their online tax preparation software. These companies quickly offered a compromise: In exchange for the IRS dropping its plan, the companies would provide their online software for free to 60% of American taxpayers -- about 78 million people.

    The result came to be known as the IRS Free File Alliance and went live just this year. It lets you choose from about a dozen different online tax preparation products that normally cost about $20-$30 each.

    Note that not everyone qualifies for the Free File Alliance because each company sets its own eligibility requirements. H&R Block's program, for instance, is free only if you earned less than $28,000 last year. Also, beware of hidden charges: Many of these companies offer the federal return preparation for free, but the state return costs extra.

    1. Re:IRS Free File Alliance by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      These companies quickly offered a compromise: In exchange for the IRS dropping its plan, the companies would provide their online software for free to 60% of American taxpayers -- about 78 million people. ... Note that not everyone qualifies for the Free File Alliance because each company sets its own eligibility requirements. H&R Block's program, for instance, is free only if you earned less than $28,000 last year.

      Very clever. So each tax software company looks over its data to determine the 60% of people who are least likely to use their services and then offers it to them, thereby fulfilling their obligation at minimum cost.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:IRS Free File Alliance by vocaro · · Score: 1
      So each tax software company looks over its data to determine the 60% of people who are least likely to use their services and then offers it to them, thereby fulfilling their obligation at minimum cost.

      I'm not sure what you mean by "least likely". Everybody has to pay taxes, and I don't think somebody who's making $100,000 a year should get tax preparation for free. It makes sense that they provide free services only to those on the lower end of the economic scale. After all, these companies aren't charities, so people who can afford to pay should pay.

      The bottom line is, They're providing their services for free to 60% of taxpayers. That's 78 million people who would otherwise have to pay. Would you rather they go back to where everyone has to pay?

      I mean, how many companies give their services away for free to 60% of their customers? Can you imagine Microsoft giving away free copies of Windows to 60% of computer users? I'm surprised that you can still be so cynical about the idea.

    3. Re:IRS Free File Alliance by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      I mean, how many companies give their services away for free to 60% of their customers? Can you imagine Microsoft giving away free copies of Windows to 60% of computer users? I'm surprised that you can still be so cynical about the idea.

      Processing an electronically-filed return is cheaper for the IRS than a paper return. So it makes more sense for them to offer electronic filing for free and charge for paper filing. They're not doing that because of pressure from the tax software industry. This amounts to a subsidy to the software vendors at the expense of taxpayers. You're damn right I'm cynical.

      The bottom line is, They're providing their services for free to 60% of taxpayers. That's 78 million people who would otherwise have to pay.

      No, they're OFFERING the service for free to 60% of taxpapers. They are not providing it to them. This is very important. They are obligated under their agreement to offer it. Each person they offer it to is one fewer person that will pay them a fee. So they want to minimize the number of people who will take them up on their offer. They do that by figuring out who isn't likely to use online computerized tax prep (i.e., people who aren't likely to have computers or be computer-literate) and offer it to them.

      To put it into the framework of your Windows example, it's like if a judge told Microsoft to offer Windows for free to 60% of the population, so they went and offered it to all the people who didn't own computers or who owned Macintoshes or who preferred Linux.

      Basically, the IRS got had - they didn't negotiate sufficiently strict requirements.

      Would you rather they go back to where everyone has to pay?

      You seem to be stuck in the fallacy of false alternatives. Are you still beating your wife?

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    4. Re:IRS Free File Alliance by vocaro · · Score: 1
      Processing an electronically-filed return is cheaper for the IRS than a paper return. So it makes more sense for them to offer electronic filing for free and charge for paper filing.

      Both are free. The IRS does not charge for paper filing.

      They're not doing that because of pressure from the tax software industry.

      No, of course not, and I think I made that clear in my original message.

      This amounts to a subsidy to the software vendors at the expense of taxpayers.

      There are two options: Without the free file alliance, the IRS would have created its own e-file software and taken business away from the tax preparation companies. That's not their concern, of course, but I think this would actually be worse for us taxpayers. That's because with the free file program, the IRS can save money by not developing and maintaining its own e-file software; it can let private companies do that and compete against each other for customers. That drives down prices and increases the quality of the software. In order to be fair to taxpayers, the IRS has made sure that nobody gets left behind by having companies offer their services for free to low-income taxpayers. I do not see a subsidy here.

      So they want to minimize the number of people who will take them up on their offer. They do that by figuring out who isn't likely to use online computerized tax prep (i.e., people who aren't likely to have computers or be computer-literate) and offer it to them.

      These people who have no computers and are not computer-literate would not be e-filing at all, not with the IRS or anyone else. So I don't think this point is logical.

      You seem to be stuck in the fallacy of false alternatives. Are you still beating your wife?

      There's no need to be insulting. I'm just trying to figure out you are suggesting as an alternative. You seem to be saying that the companies should have made the top 40%, rather than the bottom 60%, pay for e-filing. I don't agree with that at all.

    5. Re:IRS Free File Alliance by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Processing an electronically-filed return is cheaper for the IRS than a paper return. So it makes more sense for them to offer electronic filing for free and charge for paper filing.

      Both are free. The IRS does not charge for paper filing.

      You misunderstand me. When I say "cheaper for the IRS" I mean "costs the IRS less money." As in "costs less taxpayer money."

      This amounts to a subsidy to the software vendors at the expense of taxpayers.

      There are two options: Without the free file alliance, the IRS would have created its own e-file software and taken business away from the tax preparation companies. That's not their concern, of course, but I think this would actually be worse for us taxpayers. That's because with the free file program, the IRS can save money by not developing and maintaining its own e-file software; it can let private companies do that and compete against each other for customers. That drives down prices and increases the quality of the software. In order to be fair to taxpayers, the IRS has made sure that nobody gets left behind by having companies offer their services for free to low-income taxpayers. I do not see a subsidy here.

      No. Without the Free File Alliance, the IRS would have gone ahead and offered free online filing, which it wanted to do because it would save the IRS a lot of money.

      As it's played out, the people most likely to take advantage to file electronically are the ones who have to pay to do it. So a smaller number of them will do so (for instance, despite being a Great Big Geek, I filed on paper because it's almost the same amount of work for me, and filing on paper is free). So the IRS loses money (handling the extra paper returns, which is expensive) and private companies make money. This is a subsidy, whether or not you understand why.

      So they want to minimize the number of people who will take them up on their offer. They do that by figuring out who isn't likely to use online computerized tax prep (i.e., people who aren't likely to have computers or be computer-literate) and offer it to them.

      These people who have no computers and are not computer-literate would not be e-filing at all, not with the IRS or anyone else. So I don't think this point is logical.

      It's logical if you follow the reasoning from the beginning. The people without computers are completely irrelevant, except as a smokescreen for the subsidy. They would not be e-filing under any circumstance, so offering them free e-filing is a meaningless act. The only thing that matters is offering free e-filing to people who would actually use it.

      1. The IRS wants e-filing, so the IRS can save money.
      2. The IRS starts building a free e-filing system, which is a win-win proposition: taxpayers win, and the IRS wins.
      3. Tax software companies go apeshit, because they want to make money by imposing a transaction cost on e-filing.
      4. The IRS receives nastygrams from Congress and sits down to negotiate with the tax software companies.
      5. Hoping to preserve some of the win-win aspect, the IRS agrees to a deal where large number of taxpayers can still file electronically for free. The number is set at a point where IRS costs due to increased paper filing will offset the development costs for their e-filing system.
      6. Tax software companies structure the offering in order to minimize participation in the free e-filing program.
      7. IRS costs go up, private profits go up, the public loses.

      Basically this program, as structured, moves money out of the taxpayers' pockets and into the coffers of the tax software people. It is bad policy and a typical case of corporate welfare. Worse still, it uses cynical misdirection - an empty lie about helping the poor with free e-filing - to cover up what's happeni

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    6. Re:IRS Free File Alliance by vocaro · · Score: 1
      When I say "cheaper for the IRS" I mean "costs the IRS less money." As in "costs less taxpayer money."

      I'm not too sure about that. As I understand it, the IRS loses a fair amount of money through e-filing because of the higher incidence of fraud. They're actually pretty strict about who can e-file -- only if you have a simple return, don't have any foreign income, don't live abroad, etc. And I doubt processing paper returns is that expensive. It all ends up on a computer anyway, so they just hire minimum-wage data entry people to key in the forms.

      Without the Free File Alliance, the IRS would have gone ahead and offered free online filing, which it wanted to do because it would save the IRS a lot of money.

      I'd be surprised if cost was the main reason why the IRS was interested in online filing. I think the idea was simply to provide more convenience for taxpayers and more accuracy in each return. (Most government agencies aren't too concerned with their bottom line or with being "in the black".)

      So the IRS loses money (handling the extra paper returns, which is expensive) and private companies make money. This is a subsidy, whether or not you understand why.

      You keep coming back to the premise that the IRS e-file program, whatever it would have been, would save the IRS money. I do not believe this is necessarily true. For example, I am one of about a hundred tech support agents at a tax preparation company that offers online tax-preparation software. We take hundreds of calls and emails each day from users who need help using our software -- how to print, where to enter certain data, what to do if a password is forgotten, etc. And we are just one company. Imagine what would happen if the IRS had put our program, and others like it, out to pasture. They'd probably have to hire just as many agents to assist customers with their own online software. So, instead of saving the IRS money by getting rid of their paper handlers, their software probably would have raised their operating costs because of all those extra people they'd need to support it. So I just don't think your basic assumption is correct.

      Basically this program, as structured, moves money out of the taxpayers' pockets and into the coffers of the tax software people. It is bad policy and a typical case of corporate welfare.

      I think we're getting into the thorny area of deciding where public services should end and private services should begin. The issue kind of reminds me of the government's possible role in the Internet. For instance, one could argue that the government should start its own national ISP for the benefit of its citizens. You might say the government should do this because otherwise private companies would be making a profit on Internet service, thus moving money away from the government and into the private sector. But private companies can be so much more efficient than the government in providing ISP service and, through competition, they can provide lower prices and better service than the government could ever provide with a single national ISP. For the same reasons, I don't think the IRS should be in the tax preparation software business. They should let private companies duke it out and provide the best software for the lowest price that the market will bear. A one-size-fits-all, government-funded online filing program would hurt taxpayers in the long run, IMO.

      "Are you still beating your wife?" is not an insult, it's the classical example of false alternatives.

      Ah, yes, I realize what you were trying to say now. I've actually heard that expression before, but it just didn't click. Probably because I was reading your message at the end of a long, tiring workday doing tech support, and I had been getting quite a lot of calls from frustrated, desperate customers. The approaching April 15 deadline makes them even more obnoxious than usual as you might expect, so I was on the defensive and took your statement the wrong way. If you ever try to make the same point again, you might want to phrase it a little differently for people like me who sometimes have a brain fart. Anyway, my comment wasn't a false alternative; I was just asking a rhetorical question to get you to explain what you meant.

  100. Find a good accountant who needs computer help by phillymjs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every year, my accountant does my taxes, and he gets one free maintenance visit from me for his computer in exchange.

    I prefer to let him handle my taxes, because he knows all the tips and tricks to minimize my payment/maximize my refund, and I don't have to dick around with forms and receipts other than throwing them all in a folder to give to him. He prefers to let me service his computer, because I know all the tips and tricks to keep it humming along, and he doesn't have to dick around with Windows/driver/application/virus definition updates and whatnot other than to make a short list of any problems he's having.

    ~Philly

  101. Why it's easy...when you're a stupid troll by Charcharodon · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well stupidity rears it's ugly head again. That's the only major problem with Slashdot. Even the biggest of jackasses has an opinion and is able to express it on topic he knows absolutely nothing about. The original poster has a legitiment question and isn't looking for the wellfare hand out like the one most of your family is using.

    Personally I am in the same boat. It is possible to have no revenue hence no profit when you are first starting a business. The one thing I do have is debt and capital expenses. I have dropped nearly $3000 into my photography business, buying equipment, getting a website, and extra training. Before the year is up I'll most likely drop another $2000 on software and computer hardware upgrades. Can't keep using the stuff I "borrowed" from a friend.

    Most of the work I've been doing has been for nothing more than the experience which is typically how small businesses go for the first year or two. If you break even in the first year you are doing really good. Someone who shows a big profit in the first year most likely doesn't have a long term viable concept. Usually they're riding a trend or a fad and will be out of buisness by year number two. Which brings us back to what the original guy wanted to know about and what the troll showed his ignorance of.

    You can claim your start up expenses against your taxes. Office supplies, hardware, software, utilities, rent, and transportation costs. The catch is you cannot claim 100% on the first year's taxes. It must be divided up over the number of years of use. This is usually spread out over the first four years, but it depends on the equipment. A digital camera may be spread over just a couple of years, but a bulldozer may have to be claimed over ten years. After the initial start up, all the yearly costs can be deducted and only the higher dollar durable items having to be spread out over several years.

    The flip side to this is you have to show a profit, I believe, by the third year or the IRS will consider you business a hobby and will no longer be able claim anymore deductions. Goto www.irs.gov. They have good information on the do's and don'ts of small business, but it'll take some digging to find. Hit Amazon.com and hunt around for small business books that have alot of good reviews from previous customers if you want something that is more geared to the layman.

  102. Re:RTFP by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

    RTFP: "(C-corp, don't ask why...)"

    That says that he is incorporated as a C-corporation, and everything your parent said was relevant. Unlike your post, which should be modded down for failure to RTFP.

  103. So, umm.... by errxn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...what, exactly, are you trying to say? And I quote:

    The Constitution is only good when there is a government.

    OK, fair enough, I guess. There has to be something there to enforce the provisions of the Constitution. Ostensibly, anyway. It seems to me that you don't believe that the government has anything to do with the Constitution, however, to wit:

    This is an artifical [sic] idea of ours of rights.

    Well, there was that whole "Bill of Rights" thing, which was basically a codification of the stance taken in the Declaration of Independence. Of course, none of this would matter in the government that you claim exists.

    But maybe I am just mistaken. Since you claim to be so well versed on the principles of an organized government, perhaps you can enlighten us with a principled discourse on how a government which is enabled by the Constitution can so (allegedly) freely disregard it. Or, if I have misunderstood your argument, perhaps you can clarify it for me. I truly am curious.

    Oh, and if you don't mind, spare us the angry "you're a fucking moron" rhetoric and get straight to the point, mmkay?

    Thanks.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    1. Re:So, umm.... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1
      Alright, let's start over with one question: what makes you think that you are entitled to the land that you live on? Forget the Constitution, because in your ideal world, you wouldn't be paying taxes and therefore are not given the rights you are given under the Constitution or Bill of Rights. Nothing gives you the right to be on your land. Not one thing. How can you even bring up the Constitution if you're not going to pay taxes? You don't think that those things come easy, do you? You need to have somebody protecting your rights (literally, a court-appointed attorney, not to mention for enforcing and many other things).

      I guess what I'm trying to say is that you are not entitled to any of the rights granted to you under the Constitution or Bill of Rights if you're not willing to pay for them in the form of keeping our government alive to actually enforce this wonderful document that you keep on referring to. If we went by your logic, we would be covering the Ethiopians under our law documents! But we don't, because they don't pay taxes...of any kind.

    2. Re:So, umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, the rights you are talking about (or at least touched upon) are ones that come from the CREATOR. That's why they are called "inalienable rights".

      I don't know who said anything about rights to land, I think you brought that up. But the rights in the Bill of Rights are NOT GRANTED BY THE GOVERNMENT. The current tax system certainly does nothing to prop up those rights in any case.

      Geez. Pick up a book, or something.

    3. Re:So, umm.... by errxn · · Score: 1

      You must have me confused with the original parent poster; I never mentioned anything about taxes. That having been said, yes, taxes are a necessary evil so that the government can stay solvent. Who gets taxed, how much they get taxed, and by what means is another issue altogether. I don't know what "logic" of mine you are referring to; again, I assume that you are talking about the parent poster.

      About the land-rights issue: this seems to be a basic point of yours, so I'll bite. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that you are correct, if I don't have a right to the land I live on, who does?

      Awaiting your answer....

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    4. Re:So, umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no god.

    5. Re:So, umm.... by stevejsmith · · Score: 1
      About the land-rights issue: this seems to be a basic point of yours, so I'll bite. Assuming, for the sake of argument, that you are correct, if I don't have a right to the land I live on, who does?

      In terms of "rights," rights are an abstract concept which are being given by governments. In terms of our Constitution you have a right to be on the land, but if somebody takes a gun and forces you out of your home, it doesn't matter what "right" is granted to you under the Constitution, because you don't have the house and no piece of paper is going to bring that back.

    6. Re:So, umm.... by errxn · · Score: 1

      According to the Declaration of Independence, rights are not given by government, but by the "Creator", however you choose to define it. So, your argument is pretty much at odds with the tenets of that document. Fair enough.

      Now, in your scenario, who is doing the forcing at gunpoint?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    7. Re:So, umm.... by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1
      if I don't have a right to the land I live on, who does?

      The guy bigger than you, holding a bigger club. (Think caveman times). Sure cavemen paid no taxes, but you never know when someone comes and bashes your brains in because they liked your cave better, or wanted to get at your store of food.

  104. Not hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It really isn't all that hard. If all you have is standard W-2s and statements from your banks/loan agencies then it's really simple. A 1040 is all you need. If you are like me and do consulting on the side, enough to generate a 1099, then it's still really easy. It's another page. Input the total paid to you. Input expenses. Subtract. Find a figure in a table. Input that figure. blah blah blah. Put a certain figure back on your 1040 in a designated place and you're done. If you made a lot via your consulting then you'll also have to take care of estimated taxes. One way of avoiding that is to increase your W-2 withholdings at your day job. Toss in an extra $50 from each paycheck and you should be good to go. Accountants ARE NOT EXPENSIVE. Mine only costed me $100 this year. That's with 4 visits for advice, an extension, a 1040, a C, and estimated tax paperwork. That's it. Just look in the phone book for CPAs. They aren't that expensive. I do not recommend using software to do it. Do it yourself or pay someone a few bucks to do it. Oh, and one other thing, KEEP REALLY GOOD RECORDS. If you are going to declare expenses, keep records of it as the year progresses. If you buy a computer book, enter it into an organized spreadsheet as soon as it comes in. Seperate shipping and handling from actual cost/tax. If you keep this up-to-date as you go along, it won't be a mad dash come April to get it done.

  105. Hey! by Patik · · Score: 1
    I don't have any income, you insensitive clod!

  106. You do realize...??? by Skim123 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    That prior to the 20th century, there was no such thing as income tax, right? Meaning it wasn't until the 1930s or whenever income tax was added that April 15th had any sort of significance.

    Our nation has existed longer without income tax than with it. Why can't we revert back to just use-tax (i.e., sales taxes, tolls, etc.)? Wouldn't that be the most fair -- you pay for what you use and don't pay for what you don't?

    Granted, this would significantly shrink our Federal Gov'ts budget, which would drastically reduce the military complex, social programs, things like government watchdog groups, etc., and would move us back closer to laissez-faire capitalism. This has both its advantages and disadvantages, as I'm sure you know.

    Perhaps the best solution would be to have a small flat income tax rate (say 8% for everyone making over a minimum), and then just using use taxes. The income tax could pay for what military presence is needed and watchdog groups (FDA, FCC, EPA, etc.). Granted, we would have fewer bombers, and we'd be less likely to "shock and awe" folks, but maybe that'd be for the better.

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:You do realize...??? by stevejsmith · · Score: 1
      That prior to the 20th century, there was no such thing as income tax, right? Meaning it wasn't until the 1930s or whenever income tax was added that April 15th had any sort of significance.

      Back in the 19th century there wasn't such a need. You were not given nearly the amount of things that you are now given (scholarships, etc.) and there wasn't such a demand for roads and infrastructure. Not to mention that the law was virtually non-existant in some parts, and healthcare was non-existant, as well. I dare you to go back at line in 1870. Then you'll be begging to have Uncle Sam take back your money.

    2. Re:You do realize...??? by apchar · · Score: 1

      Steve, you have a peculiar definition of need (scholarships??). Tell you what.. Lets take uncle sam back to his original role (police, defense, civil courts) for a decade or so. Pay for it all with a very small flat tax or better yet, a sales tax on durable goods. If you find me 'begging uncle same to take back my money' I promise to shut up about taxes forever.
      You fucking moron.

      --
      ---Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.
    3. Re:You do realize...??? by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      Cool. Tomorrow at my place? You bring the tea, I'll bring the crumpets. We'll invite Uncle Sam (on your mom's side, right?) over and we'll talk to him about it.

  107. A couple general tips... by Pettifogger · · Score: 1
    Just remember that your tax return is your first offer to the IRS. Go ahead and deduct any and everything you think you're entitled to. If they're willing to buy it, great. If not, you get to negotiate whether it was deductible or not. Even if you're found liable for something, you can often settle for a percentage of what you owe. Just don't make stuff up or file blatant lies- that can get you in some serious trouble.

    Also, if you don't want to pay a professional, just browse through the lists of forms (it's all online at irs.gov) and see if any of them ring some bells for you. If they do, download the form and instructions and throw it in there. And once you've done this, you'll know what to do next year.

    --

    IAAL

  108. Information on IRS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are correct when you say the IRS agents have a disclaimer.

    For those of you not willing to do the research, the IRS is a division of the IMF (Internation Monetary Fund). The IRS is a corporation that incorporated out of Maryland. And another thing, the "UNITED STATES", not to be confused with the "united States of America" aka "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA", incorporated in Costa Rica.

    Back to the IRS, some cool independant lawyer, yeah I know nobody likes lawyers-but this guy rocks, Chris Hansen is a "lawyer" with his wires crossed and receives heavently pleasure at torturing the IRS with his investigations and factoids. Browser here for just a small part of his site, albeit just one small part of his IRS investigation, that provides some verry scarry affirmed facts of the IRS.

    As always, you did not receive this as legal advice from me or Mr. Chris Hansen, and neither is the information you receive by him to be construed as you receiving legal advice from Mr. Chris Hansen or any unidentified agent posting through a web forum.

    Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207
    Anonymous Coward

  109. Mistake, URL is provided here! I should preview.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Browse here for a small part of the IRS investigation by Mr. Chris Hansen.

  110. Have some faith, and be certain, brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all in this together.

    David Koresh wasn't a tax protestor and according to the IRS handbook, if you do not submit to them by filing as a 503(c), then you are labeled as a Tax Protester with extreme prejudice. According to the IRS handbook, the IRS is at liberty to classify any as a Tax Protester and as such does not provide any such information on why.

    According to the Constitution of the united States of America, 1st Ammendment, nobody can make any law respecting or prohibiting an establishment of religion. So far, 17 states and the IRS, have infringed upon the 1st Ammendment to the Constitution of the united States of America by making laws recognizing and trying to classify a religion.

    What you and countless others don't recognize is the fact that according to Common Law, a State is a person providing a service. The IRS doesn't have a State, it incorporated out of Maryland. Am I the only Corporate Sole that recognizes the IRS is a Church (body of persons) perpetuating an unlawfully implied state of war? I'm not a tax protester because I recognize and point out the laws that prove I am exempt from taxes. If they try to slander and libel me as a Tax Protester, may God save them from my legal wrath. If they try to confiscate my Linux box with MySQL of accounting information, you better believe with or without the 2nd Ammendment I will rain fire down on the IRS building.

    It is written in my Bible, "The meek will inherit the Earth". Yeah, it isn't good to war against others, but where is it written that Corporations (such as IRS) may break apart families and turn people against eachother in disagreement of the LAWS OF THE LAND; all by taxation without representation, not invested back into those that were taxed, and against the people's will and not providing any service for such tax.

    I have charities for many people and I live only once. The IRS knows not to steal from me. They would be abusing an institution (me) of my heavenly father; to help others.

    Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207
    Anonymous Coward

  111. this was damn useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never heard of this org but it turns out this is great information. Thanks for posting it.

  112. this is..... by doublehelix_nz · · Score: 0

    slashdot. the HQ of the worlds g33ks.

    Go code a program to do your taxes.

    Give it some Decent AI and it will screw up the IRS on your behalf.

    really, why isnt there a simple program, enter in your data, and it spits out exacly what they want. rather than a 3cm thick stack of paper, a measly bytes of info would suffice........

    but hey, i dont live in the US......
    THANK GOD

  113. Like most small business startups. by blanks · · Score: 1

    Have your mom do them. Seriously, they can do everything!

    --
    I deleted my sig years ago.
  114. I just finished filing in the same situation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I am also the President of a Delwware C-corp with no revenues for teh tax year 2002. Here's what you need to do:
    1. File and pay your state franchise tax. In my case, it's Deleware and $50. Easy to do, but if you haven't already you will have to pay a $50 fine plus 1.5% interest per month. See ecorp.state.de.us for details.
    2. For U.S taxes, file form 1120-A. With zarro revenue, you skip filling out Parts III and IV. See www.irs.gov for details and accompanying instructions.
    2a. You may need to fill out some accompanying schedules (4797 for sale of business property, Other Deductions schedule, etc).
    2b. YOU WILL NOT HAVE TO PAY A PENALTY. Yes you are late; however, because you have zarro revenue you will have zarro US tax to pay. Hence, you will not be penalized or fined. See the instructions for Form 1120 and look in the payment submission fine print to get the exact quote.
    2c. You can deduct business startup expenses.
    2d. Amortizing depreciable assets is a pain - get an accountant if you want/need to do this (have a lot of business computers?)
    2e. If you paid yourself anything that does not constitute business expense reimbursement, get an accountant to sort out the details. My rule of thumb is to self-file and do all the accounting UNTIL I begin paying wages to myself. Then it is time to bring in a professional CPA (especially if you hire anyone other than yourself to work for the corp).
    3. Send EVERYTHING to the state and federal authorities via CERTIFIED, RETURN-RECEIPT REQUIRED, mail. Trust me - they've lost mine before and you will want proof that the IRS received the package.

  115. I have some faith, and I'm certain, brother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Koresh was a tax protestor, he founded his "church" as a way around the tax laws. There was some dispute as to whether it was really a church; the other charges were bullshit, but they would play in the media.

    And the IRS can and will do bad things with court protection. The Constitution is irrelevant - go read the "Patriot" Acts if you doubt me. The only way there will be tax reform is if the people arm themselves and take to the streets. That won't ever happen, there's just too many feeders at the public trough, and way too many suckers of the government tit, for a revolution to happen. I'm too old to keep fighting and losing to the bastards, so I pay an accountant to figure out how much tribute the Feds require from me each year. I pay, and they don't fuck me up so bad any more.

  116. Section 179 expenses by Michael+Ross · · Score: 0

    ...you cannot claim 100% [of your start up expenses] on the first year's taxes.

    You can if they all can be considered Section 179 expenses, which is often the case for most small businesses.

  117. Advantages to Incorporating with no Income by drgreening · · Score: 1

    Startups presently making no money still have a number of advantages in filing as a C Corporation. If you're serious about an eventual multi-million dollar company, you should spend a few hundred and talk to a wise corporate lawyer soon.

    First and foremost: If you obtain stock (not options) in a C corp (NOT an S corp or LLC) that is worth less than something like $30M when you get the stock (mine was worth near-zero), and if you hold it for at least 5 years, you can take advantage of a 50% discount on your capital gains taxes.

    Remember: a 50% discount can be worth millions of dollars. Even if it's worth only $100,000, it would be worth it. It cut my capital gains from 28% to 14%. This is a reward from the US Govt for having the insight and fortitude to create a company from next-to-nothing. It is called an "83(b) Election", and it requires your shareholders (aka employees, maybe just you) to file an "83(b) Election form" when they file their personal tax forms.

    Second: If you have employees, you can deduct taxes on health insurance from the company's expenses. You didn't used to be able to do this with an S corp, but maybe things have changed. This isn't a huge advantage. The big one is the first.

    When I formed our C corporation, it really did seem silly to file these 83(b) Election forms, but we did what our lawyers told us to do. I can tell you that the 5 founders of our company are incredibly grateful.

    I think we probably spewed $15,000 on legal fees in our first year of no-revenue operation. It took about 3 years before we made anything reasonable in revenue (like more than $100,000). We never made a profit. But we were acquired for a respectable amount of money. And our software is still in wide use.

    It took about 5 years for our company to reach liquidity, through 3 mergers. Even after all that rigamarole, that 83(b) Election came through.

    It's disappointing to see so many people talking about stuff here that they don't understand, and worse putting you down for not making any money yet. As you can see, the road to success is lined with naysayers. That's always the case with innovators, so don't let it get you down.

    I do think that advice to get an accountant is probably reasonable (although I only use accountants for advice, not to do the actual filings).

    However, if you are serious about creating a self-sustaining company with lots of revenue, I highly recommend a corporate lawyer. Because I am cheap, I use our corporate lawyers sparingly, asking for contract reviews only on the first contracts of a particular type, asking for patent reviews but writing patents myself (do follow suggestions about Nolo's Patent It Yourself and other Nolo books--very good resources).

    Good luck.

  118. how to lower the complexity of taxes by Submarine · · Score: 1

    I am not surprised. The same kind of phenomenon goes here (France), and I suspect everywhere in the developed world.

    Yet there seems to be an urge to keep things manageable here:

    * Some saving accounts with moderate interest rates, under a fixed ceiling, are tax-free.

    * You can choose between declaring real professional expenses or say nothing, in which case you get a flat 10% rebate. For most people, this is more than their professional expenses, so few people declare real expenses.

    * Sometimes, cruft is cleaned out of the tax code. For instance, there used to be deductions from income tax if you had some work done on your main domicile; they are now gone.

    Generally speaking, the system is designed so that most people just have to copy a single number.

    My case was more complex (several employers with salaries; consulting fees; deductible pension plans), but it just amounted to downloading another form and filling two numbers, following the instruction the tax people gave me by email.

  119. can you file online, free of charge? by Submarine · · Score: 1

    Is it possible to file taxes online in the US, free of charge? I saw some sites doing e-filing, but apparently they charge for it.

    (I didn't use it, but the French state income taxes can now be filed online.)

  120. Funny. by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1


    You know what's funny? Retards who think that the president makes the economy turn on a dime. You know what causes the economy to dive-bomb? THINGS THAT WERE PUT IN PLACE OVER THE PAST SEVERAL YEARS. Ya dumbass, sheesh. The economy was dive-bombing JUST AS Bush was getting into the office. You think he can get into office, make a few phone calls, and then cause the economy to change? Well, he can't. And anyone who thinks otherwise needs to pull their head of their ass. The reason the economy dive-bombed was because of the Tech bubble and fiscal policy put into place during Clinton's presidency. Now, Clinton may have not made enough changes to cause the dive-bomb alone, but along with whatever changes all the other offices wanted and the bursting Tech bubble, the economy would have dive-bombed whether Gore or Bush became president.

  121. "M.S.S." is Muhammed Saeed al-Sahhaf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod the grandparent up as funny!!

    You obviously missed the joke-- it's a parody of the Iraqi Minister of Information, Muhammed Saeed al-Sahhaf. You know, the guy who says things like "The Americans have started to commit suicide under the walls of Baghdad." He told reporters, "We have retaken the airport. There are NO Americans there. I will take you there and show you. IN ONE HOUR!"

    Check out this page for a good laugh!

    Just for the record, I've seen an awful lot of Americans on TV lately who come across as "ignorant barbarians who support murder."

  122. I am content and you have doubt, respectivly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand your doubt. You've seen many innocent and not-so-innoncent (Koresh) people get taken down by the IRS. You are looking at the situation as I look at people jumping off cliffs with hanggliders. To jump or not to jump?

    The only way there will be tax reform is if the people arm themselves and take to the streets.

    I am one of those people! I have systematically challenged every peice of legislation and defeated it in court! Look at your Constitution, brother! If you adhere to it, then you will recognize its compromise by unlawful agents! As I said earlier, the 1st Ammendment to my Constitution says that no law shall be made respecting or prohibiting an establishment of religion. Do you not recognize its premise? I don't mean any disrespect, but your doubt in this situation is costing many others their freedom by not acting on your Constitution. As well, the Patriot Act is not lawful, why are you not taking to the streets with the knowledge to defeat the unlawful? I read the Patriot Act and it was such child-constructed garbage of Orin Hatch; he kept jumping back and forth between "American", "citizen", and "person" that the law is inconsistent of anything but what the unlawful Corporations pull out act upon without any affirmation. The Patriot Act is NULL AND VOID,

    It is We, the People that correct those that govern us. According to the Constitution of the united States of America, a government is contractual and if they operate otherwise then you and I are to correct them. Honestly, the Revolutionary War didn't accomplish anything; read the Declaration of Independance in full and recognize that all treaties and contracts with Britain and others are still valid; it's just that a Declaration of Independance and Constitution/Corporation Aggregate was created for the ex-Britain (colonists) to fall upon away from the King/Britain.

    Can you say, Common Law is under attack?

    I must go, no time left. Contact revokethetrust [at] yahoo [dot] com for information from one cool dude.

  123. Tax Tips For Small Folks by newHercules · · Score: 1

    Has no one mentioned Intuit Tax Freedom Project?

    Anyone with adjusted gross income of under $27,000 qualifies for free on-line state and federal tax self-preparation using state of the art software. I have used it for the three years since starting my profitless business. It allows you most of the schedules, including C, and you can get the refund due you for your business losses.

    The best part is you can actually earn $30,500 adjusted gross. Put $3500 into a 401k by Tuesday Apr 15th (your max per year), and it gets deducted, and taken off AGI. These income levels change every year.

    Go to http://www.taxfreedom.com

    --
    newHercules
  124. Smells like IIS by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The tax code isn't like programming - it's internally inconsistent, because of the patch-it-and-try-again way it gets built.

    So in other words, the tax code is Microsoft Windows, right?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  125. Do you have the $$$? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The Patriot Act is NULL AND VOID

    Not until revokethetrust_yahoo_com foots the bill to pay lawyers to have it overturned.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  126. Easiest Solution of All by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything you ever wanted or needed to know about the taxes you "owe": www.givemeliberty.com Read the facts. Check the sources. Proceed accordingly. Naysayers are also encouraged to read the facts and check sources before barfing up knee-jerk responses to this post.

  127. Nolo Press - Tax Savvy for Small Business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I highly recommend
    Tax Savvy For Small Business for small-business newbies.

  128. New Acronym by Webmoth · · Score: 1

    IANATA, or I am not a tax accountant.

    --
    Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  129. taxes? we don't need no stinkin' taxes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought nerds were smart people. How can you take taxes seriously? It's all in your mind, you know. Stop saying things like "my taxes", "pay your taxes", "citizenship", "our representatives", "our boys in Iraq", etc. Then you will be free. Free your mind, your wallet will follow :-)

  130. Will the doubt end? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes you think the bill is not quenchable?
    All that is required is time and you are required to be your own lawyer: Pro Se or Pro Per; Sui Juris. You are thinkin *inside* the box. You imply your relevance to a lawyer, a credited member of the BAR (British Accredited Regency) to have it overturned and this in NOT acceptable to us Americans. We do not practice law, we participate. You need to have it overturned Pro Per, and with so much doubt how will you accomplish similar victories?

    Many things caused all the problems of today, and the IRS is just a spike of _someone_else's_creation_ that is taking advantage of the confusion. Do you not understand the fraudulent use of Federal Reserve Notes and the forgotten existance of the Spanish Milled "Dollar"? Of'course, you'll say somthing around the tree as "I heard of somthin...", and you kept using them without further investigation. You are a potentional aire of nonspeakable wealth endowed to you by God... If you are held to repay the Public Debt, how do you pay it back with Federal Reserve Notes when they are not "lawful money" to be redeemed for Gold or Silver coin? And who says you are liable for the Public Debt? It's a nexus, using promisory notes to be exchanged for promisory notes, ad infinitum. The Public Debt grows, only a few of us know about it's true meaning and some have constructed methods to pay it back to abolish the "UNITED STATES." As of 1871, the "Act of 1871" called for a creation of the "UNITED STATES". They'll still hold you for ransom to pay the Public Debt, until you send those affidavits to secure your sovereignty of which they can't dishonor. But then, you'ld already gone over your head because you have no law under your feet with which to prosecute. You must be outside of the UNITED STATES, looking in. Your Person is not secure and your Transmitting Utility is owned by the UNITED STATES.

    READ THE URL(s) I PROVIDED! THEY ASSIST YOU TO SHAKE AWAY FROM THE MENTAL CHAINS, BUT IT IS UPTO YOU TO REMOVE THE PHYSICAL CHAINS.

  131. Re:Handly list of links I've used since 99 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe because goatse.cx is a part of OSDN?

  132. Beware H&R block... by phamlen · · Score: 1

    As an H&R horror story, I went to H&R Block when I was an independent software consultant. I specifically asked them to calculate my estimated quarterly tax forms for the next year.

    The preparer created federal estimated forms but not the State ones, telling me that it wasn't necessary to file estimated quarterlies for the state. Cost me several thousands of dollars in penalties, and HR Block claimed they weren't responsible because they hadn't filled out those forms (which was the whole reason I had to pay penalties.)

    So I got an accountant, and I'm much happier.

  133. FILE, GOD DAMMIT! by dacarr · · Score: 1
    I am not a lawyer, accountant, or anything like that, but I work as a case manager for a tax help firm that, for the purpose, shall remain anonymous. We handle clients who need defense against tax levies and garnishments, and prepare offers in compromise for them. (See IRS form 656 if you don't know what this is.)

    In short, that you don't have to file if you made no money is technically correct, but complete bullsh*t at the same time.

    In long, if you do not file, the IRS and (where applicable) your local tax agencies will make gratuitous assumptions and file for you. Filing a zero return (you send a 1040/940/941/1120/insert form here that says to all intents "I made nothing"), while it is technically not required, is the Right Thing if you want to keep out of trouble with the IRS and company. That, and if you're in the midst of an offer in compromise orr a payment arrangement with them, if you don't file even a zero return, you will find your offer or PA rejected or defaulted.

    To wit, though, if you had ANY REVENUE FLOW WHATSOEVER, whether or not it balances out to zero in the end, file. No, do it. Fill out the bloody forms and send them in. Not filing is spectacularly stupid and will get you into serious trouble, and anyone who tells you otherwise is probably not an accountant.

    --
    This sig no verb.
  134. Do a 1040 and schedule C by dacarr · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's not *totally* necessary per my other post, but not filing is a Very Bad Idea. If you really made absolutely nothing doing business or paid nothing doing business, you're left with nothing naturally. It's like that song that Eric Idle sang at the end of Life Of Brian. Nonetheless, send in that Sched C, and do the long form. It's just a good idea.

    --
    This sig no verb.