Slashdot Mirror


Spring Cleaning For Your Hard Drive

Shutup Now writes "Spring cleaning for your hardrive. This article talks about some extremes for keeping your computer running well. You decide whether this stuff is necessary." More than once a year is a good idea, too.

337 comments

  1. format c:\ by poison_reverse · · Score: 5, Funny

    spring cleaning the right way- time for a clean install! It was time for a new porn archive anyway...

    --
    _+_+__+_+_+_+_+_+_+++
    when i moo u moo - just like that
    1. Re:format c:\ by czion3 · · Score: 1

      I wish, my whole entire family screams at me every time I do that. I'm running linux of a live cd.

    2. Re:format c:\ by BenV666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but get your commands right:
      format c: /autotest
      Confirmation? What confirmation?

  2. It's time to clean when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... The power supply fan halts on the 6 oz. of dust blocking the blades.

    1. Re:It's time to clean when... by bigwayne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      its real spring cleaning:
      when that 6 oz. of dust blocks the blades, and your PSU pops all over the back wall...
      true story

      --
      400 Person LAN for Charity: Zion LAN 2005
    2. Re:It's time to clean when... by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      My PSU shot smoke out of the back and then set on fire, guess I should have done that.

    3. Re:It's time to clean when... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know a safe way to force an ATX ps outside the case? I found this. Is there a simpler way like a faux ATX MB connector with a switch for various voltages? I really just need 12 volt atm. Thanks in advance.

  3. Life is too short by flend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Your hdd is filling up? Buy another one :) In my opinion spring cleaning is forced by hard drive failure, just make sure you've backed up any original data (savegames, work, probably 600 mb worth :)).

    1. Re:Life is too short by markov_chain · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One step further: buy a new hard drive every spring. Their capacity doubles every year, so you don't even need to back anything up, just copy to the new hard drive and stash the old one somewhere.

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    2. Re:Life is too short by los+furtive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That has been my philosophy since about 1996, and it has served me well. Having a notebook also helps to making sure that important data is duplicated.

      I buy a new HD about every 18 months, it usually gives me enough room to dump my (full) previous HD, and still have an equivalent amount of free space. It takes me about 18 months anyways to fill up what's left on the new hard drive.

      My friend's trick is to buy small sized hard drives from a big retailer that gives the 'premium' warranty, which is usually good for 2-3 years. When the warranty is almost out, he backs up his data, takes the drive out of the case and drops it from waist height onto the floor. He brings it in, and thanks to Moore's law, gets a new drive that is usually about twice as big as what he originaly had, since HD manufacturers stop making the small sized drives with time.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    3. Re:Life is too short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So your friend is the reason why hard drive warranties have gone into the toilet. Thanks for abusing the system and spoiling it for the rest of us, asswipe.

    4. Re:Life is too short by drewbradford · · Score: 1

      Extreme? This is /.!

      Where are the nanobots that crawl over your platters, looking for bits that look a little worn out?

      I WANT NANOBOTS!

    5. Re:Life is too short by los+furtive · · Score: 0, Troll

      I know you're trolling but it was him, not me. And yes, it is entirely my friend's fault that HD warranties now suck.

      He's also been known to download MP3s off the net and even the odd DivX. Oooooh. People bitch about the rules being too strict all the time and then never do anything about it, well at least he's doing something, even if it's bending/breaking them.

      Bite me, bite him, bite yo'self, fool.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    6. Re:Life is too short by Elbereth · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Now I see why you're an enemy of a friend.

      What a dumbass.

    7. Re:Life is too short by los+furtive · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Now I see why you're an enemy of a friend.

      Whatever. Enemies of your friends also include CmdrTaco, CowboyNeal, JohnKatz (whatever happened to him, or did I just start filtering his posts?), CleverNickName, Hemos and ChrisD amongst others.

      Looks like I'm in good company.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    8. Re:Life is too short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Thanks for cutting warranties from 3 years to 1 year for the rest of us.

    9. Re:Life is too short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this friend of yours a spammer by any chance?

  4. No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't take tech tips from the newspaper.

    1. Re:No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... especialy articles with lines like "...which will be pretty similar to what Windows ME and 98 and even Red Hat Linux folks do, too."

    2. Re:No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right. Newspaper writers are just that, not techies. The editor has them write computer tips columns anyway. Hire a real techie to write your column? "Those that can do, do. Those that can't, teach."

    3. Re:No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      what an irresponsible article.

      "3. I make sure I have the original CDs or downloaded software files (including all the drivers for printers, modems and so on) for all programs I use, plus any passwords or keys necessary to reinstall those programs. (I don't bother to back up the programs on my hard drive because I have the originals.)"

      well, bully for you. I try to keep the original source tree on hand. thats why I need more HD space I guess.

      hey I never use this /sbin stuff .... (click click)

    4. Re:No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I try to keep the original source tree on hand. thats why I need more HD space I guess

      Understandable. I collect Magic: The Gathering cards even though I never play the game.

    5. Re:No offense, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story:

      On my very first Linux installation, I removed a bunch of "unnecessary" files to save space. The files removed included glibc.so.

  5. you know what they say about windows by facts · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a new install every six months is the best way to make sure every thing keeps running well

    1. Re:you know what they say about windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's FUNNY because it makes fun of Microsoft!

    2. Re:you know what they say about windows by Crashmarik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sad but true. Everytime I have a new piece of windows software I ask is this the one thats going to irretrievably break my OS.

    3. Re:you know what they say about windows by NineNine · · Score: 0, Troll

      If you're re-installing your OS every 6 months, you're doing something terribly, terribly wrong. Hell, it's easy to have 6 months of uptime with any modern Windows OS.

    4. Re:you know what they say about windows by zank · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well maybe if you turn the computer on and never use it. Better not even look at it.

    5. Re:you know what they say about windows by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody still teach kids these days GIGO?

    6. Re:you know what they say about windows by n9hmg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      6 months of uptime with any modern Windows... means you're not installing the weekly critical security update patches, all of which require reboot.
      What's your IP address again?

    7. Re:you know what they say about windows by villain170 · · Score: 1


      Well, it depends on if you consider those "crashes" or just routine maintenance. In either case, you've got a solid point.

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    8. Re:you know what they say about windows by wo1verin3 · · Score: 0

      >> If you're re-installing your OS every 6 months, you're doing something terribly, terribly wrong.

      Obligatory Response 1: How Long Have You Been Brainwashed..er.. Working For MS?

      Obligatory Response 2: Something terribly terribly wrong like installing software or checking e-mail?

    9. Re:you know what they say about windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I simply restart needed processes. that is all.

    10. Re:you know what they say about windows by thechink · · Score: 1, Interesting

      a new install every six months is the best way to make sure every thing keeps running well

      Uh oh, I'd better find my Windows 2K CD and reinstall Windows, according to you I'm two years overdue!

      Oh wait that was a gratuitous MS bash, I get it.

      Been running Windows 2000 on a P3/800MHz very well now for 2.5 years.

    11. Re:you know what they say about windows by EvanED · · Score: 1

      Obligory response:

      I've run Windows XP since last August. I reinstalled over Thanksgiving break because installing PGP make something go horribly wrong, and my computer ceased to boot completely.

      I also ran Mandrake Linux 9 from August to the reinstall of XP. (At which point I could no longer boot to linux as XP overwrote LiLo, and I couldn't figure out how to get it to work and didn't feel like a reinstall, so I just reformatted wit partition magic to a NTFS partition.)

      I had more system crashes under the 2 1/2-3 months I had Linux than I have had under 9 months of XP (not including the bajillion times I tried to boot after installing PGP).

    12. Re:you know what they say about windows by EverDense · · Score: 1

      Doesn't anybody still teach kids these days GIGO?

      Yep, your local McDonalds "family" restaurant.

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    13. Re:you know what they say about windows by Gheesh · · Score: 1

      Yes, like Schrödinger's cat, Windows won't be dead until you get near your computer and check by yourself :-)

    14. Re:you know what they say about windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I patch my system regularly, but I still reinstall Windows once every six months. Windows just gets pretty bloated when you install more programs. To keep an optimized system really does require that you start from scratch at least once a year.

    15. Re:you know what they say about windows by natefanaro · · Score: 1

      True, true. That was my philosophy till windows XP. I haven't done a reinstall since it came out. It's very close though.

    16. Re:you know what they say about windows by jcenters · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the quotation marks be around restaurant instead?

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

    17. Re:you know what they say about windows by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      And that is different from linux how?

      Oh, yeah...I don't have to download, recompile and then reboot.

      Anyway, screw linux until they get a decent CAD/CAM package and the games (and no, a couple of games years late doesn't count).

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    18. Re:you know what they say about windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah, they said that about Windows 95. And when was that released? 8 years ago?

      Try Windows 2000 or Windows XP. I've run the hell out of this XP system and it still works and performs as well as the first day I installed it (September of 2001).

    19. Re:you know what they say about windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it just me or does the mention of "your system will run faster if you clean up your data files" make you cringe.
      I ran my AmigaOS 3.1 for 5 years without having to reinstall... it didn't slow down no matter how many files... and when it broke I could always step back and work out why.
      Am I the only one who still believes that the next release of 'your favourite' OS should run faster with less overhead?
      Anyway... for data storage, I don't think you can beat a decent hardware RAID with tape backup... call me old fashioned, but at least you can rebuild it from DOS.

    20. Re:you know what they say about windows by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      If I were running Windows XP and needed to do a little house cleaning, the first thing I'd do is blow away Windows XP. I might load a version of 98 or 2000, but they can keep that damned spyware in their house... I don't want it in mine.

    21. Re:you know what they say about windows by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      CAD? Perhaps Synopsys will do?
      They've got that, and their timing extraction tools, and others (I'm out of the semiconductor business now, so I've lost track), and last I knew, Cadence was porting their stuff too.

    22. Re:you know what they say about windows by CentrX · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? The only thing you have to recompile and reboot if you want to upgrade is the kernel, and you there is so rarely a security hole in the kernel that you almost never need to do it.

      --

      "The price of freedom is eternal vigilance." - Thomas Jefferson
  6. Every day is springtime by SYFer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The need for a "spring cleaning," IMO, is analogous to letting your sink pile up with dirty dishes. The messier things get, the more daunting (and unlikely to be completed) the cleaning task becomes. After years of gradually creating messes on my hard drive, I finally learned, through effort and discipline, to put my time and energy into "up-front cleaning." That is, I try to bring closure to everything I do before it fades into HD oblivion.

    If I decide an app sucks, I eliminate it on the spot. I put everything related to a project into a single folder whenever possible and when the job is over, I take the time to archive it out to DVD or whatever. I delete all the "test files" ASAP (how many "finalfinal02_B.*'s do you have stashed away?). Delete all those old pr0n files regularly! Dump those log files!

    It takes tremendous discipline to avoid it, but I've found all too often, that "spring cleanings" actually tend to be needed on an emergency basis when a new paying project needs space or when performance slows to a crawl.

    Similarly, how many bachelor geeks have spent two hours doing dishes on an emergency basis before an important client or, god forbid, a member of the opposite sex is due to arrive.

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    1. Re:Every day is springtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      letting your sink pile up with dirty dishes. The messier things get, the more daunting (and unlikely to be completed) the cleaning task becomes.


      Hmm. But just after you've eaten, you want to relax and enjoy the food. How do you get around that?

    2. Re:Every day is springtime by NineNine · · Score: 4, Funny

      Similarly, how many bachelor geeks have spent two hours doing dishes on an emergency basis before an important client or, god forbid, a member of the opposite sex is due to arrive.


      Now come on... how many bachelor geeks have members of the opposite sex that aren't related by blood come over to their apartment/house? That's not a very realistic sitation. Besides, who uses "dishes" any more? All of the food I eat comes in disposable packaging.

    3. Re:Every day is springtime by SYFer · · Score: 1

      Exactly the problem.

      After I've created a cool graphic or video, I want to sit around and enjoy that too without going and deleting all the temp files I piled up on my desktop to create it.

      It isn't easy in either case, but I try hard to do it.

      --
      "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    4. Re:Every day is springtime by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      one word.. DISHWASHER :)

      slap those badboys in the dishwasher, and you can start it anytime.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    5. Re:Every day is springtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dishwasher? What platforms is it available on? Do you have a DL link?

    6. Re:Every day is springtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd agree - the biggest annoyance of not tidying up a drive regularly is that when you do, none of your recently used file lists in applications work any more - so ironically, you can't find anything.

      For easy access while working on a project, I tend to drop stuff onto the desktop. It makes wrapping a project up a lot easier when you've finished.

    7. Re:Every day is springtime by smilingirl · · Score: 4, Funny

      DELETED!!!!!!!!!! DELETED!!!!!!!!!! Ahh, I feel so cleansed! Spring cleaning makes me think of that old Strong bad email.

      --
      The Present is the point at which time touches eternity. - C.S. Lewis
    8. Re:Every day is springtime by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
      That's not a very realistic sitation. Besides, who uses "dishes" any more? All of the food I eat comes in disposable packaging.

      I'll have you know all dishes are made from the only the finest silicon compounds.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:Every day is springtime by Norman+Lorrain · · Score: 2, Funny
      The need for a "spring cleaning," IMO, is analogous to letting your sink pile up with dirty dishes.

      In my university days, I used to wait until I could smell them from the living room.

    10. Re:Every day is springtime by golgotha007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      oh yes, i do agree with the 'cleaning as you go' attitude, but there's something else you fail to mention.
      ever notice that the more apps you install in any version of windows, the slower and clunkier it gets? no problem you say? just uninstall the app, remove leftover files and delete registry entries? sure, defrag the hard drive while you're at it, hmm?

      yes, then how come after doing all that, it still seems slower and clunkier than before?
      i have some friends that reinstall windows, drivers and favorite apps every 3 months (isn't ghost great?)

    11. Re:Every day is springtime by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget: Paper plates are microwave safe!

      You can cook damn near anything in the microwave and have it turn out perfect. Anything else goes into the toaster oven!
      =Smidge=

    12. Re:Every day is springtime by slamb · · Score: 1
      I put everything related to a project into a single folder whenever possible and when the job is over, I take the time to archive it out to DVD or whatever. I delete all the "test files" ASAP (how many "finalfinal02_B.*'s do you have stashed away?).

      My approach to these things is to use a version control system. This is great for several reasons:

      • It makes it really easy to work from different machines, which I do all the time. I've got my main desktop, my laptop, my firewall (which stores its configuration in version control), my dedicated server, plus my desktop and Linux machine at work. Oh and another firewall at my parents' house. Just "svn up" on a given machine and I've got the latest version of everything.
      • I can see all the history of everything without ever wondering if "finalfinal02_B.*" is really final, to use your example. Whenever I make a change, I make a log message. Usually a pretty short one (for text-ish files, the diff is often self-explanatory) but it's enough. I can pull any version easily, see what changed between two, etc.
      • I have lots and lots of data safety without much effort checking it in uploads it to my server, which is backed up every night to tape by my ISP. And I have working copies on many different machines, so at least the latest version of everything gets sent to another machine whenever I type "svn up" from it. It would take an act of God for me to lose my data.
      • It's easy! I tend to use the commandline tools, but there are good GUIs available, too. At work we use TortoiseCVS, which integrates with the Windows shell. There's also TortoiseSVN (based on Subversion), which is more advanced but a little more bleeding edge.

      I actually use Subversion for not only code but also configuration files, school projects, anything really. The only thing I can think of that it probably wouldn't be suitable for is huge media files, where the storage space of the repository history might be prohibitive. You mentioned archiving to DVD, so you might fall into this category, but most people should give this method a try.

    13. Re:Every day is springtime by Solosoft · · Score: 1

      Eh , I personally only do a "apt-get autoclean" and BANG all my "cleaning" is done ... any other crap can be removed (mostly text files on my /home dir)

    14. Re:Every day is springtime by schmink182 · · Score: 2, Funny
      It would take an act of God for me to lose my data.

      You dare mock me.

      *crash* *kaboom* *scream*

      Hahahahaha!!!

    15. Re:Every day is springtime by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Exactly the rant *I* was going to make [g]

      A computer that *needs* "spring cleaning" is a computer that suffers chronic neglect in the first place.

      Yeah, maybe it's time to toss out that old porn you don't look at anymore, and uninstall that useless app you tried out, but that's not what the article focused on -- rather, on the notion that "everything needs reinstalling once a year". What crap! I dunno about other OSs, but if a DOS/Win system slows to a crawl or becomes unstable over time, it's a safe bet you've not defragged, killed tempfiles, or done a registry scrub in living memory.

      Here's what I beat into my clients' heads: 1) Defrag religiously once a week whether you think it needs it or not. 2) Kill tempfiles once a week. 3) Run a registry scrubber (I use EasyCleaner from ToniArts.com) after every uninstall, and once a month on G.P. 4) DON'T INSTALL JUNKWARE!! If you insist on trying every cute halfbaked program that comes down the pipe, invest in a $200 goat box and abuse that, not your everyday box.

      Given even such simple basic maintenance, any WinSetup be well-behaved indefinitely, without ever needing a reinstall.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    16. Re:Every day is springtime by beowulfcluster · · Score: 1

      In my university days I used to wait until I went home to see my parents and bring them with me.

    17. Re:Every day is springtime by E-prospero · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah - What you need is to take a bachelor lesson from PJ O'Rourke.

      You will need:
      - 1 set of dishes, purchased at local thrift store
      - 2 pot lids, also from thrift store.
      - About 20 boxes of jello crystals.

      Method:
      1) Cook dinner. Use a fresh plate for each meal.
      2) When meal is complete, scrape excess off plate into bin, put plate in sink.
      3) Turn on hot tap, add enough water to cover plate.
      4) Add 2 boxes of jello to the water. Allow the jello to set.
      5) Each meal, repeat steps 1-4.
      6) When the sink is almost full, put the two pot lids in the sink, handles upwards, fill the sink with hot water (leaving the handles on the pot lids exposed), and add the last of your jello.
      7) When the jello sets, you should have a sink full of jello and dishes, with two pot handles exposed at the top of the jello.
      8) Use the two exposed handles to pull the entire jello block out of the sink, take the sink-sized jello cube to the thrift store, and put it in the donations bin. Then go into the thrift store, and buy a new set of dishes, and two more pot lids.

      The thrift store will then clean your dishes of leftover food and jello, before putting them back on sale. Next week, when you deliver another jello cube, you can buy the same cleaned dishes again. The money you pay buying the same dishes over and over is a donation to the thrift store, so they keep someone needy employed, and you get nice clean dishes for every meal.

      Russ %-)

      --
      ... and never, ever play leapfrog with a unicorn.
  7. Windows Home Users tips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now appearing on Slashdot! Coming soon, how to set the time on your VCR!

    1. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by jkeyes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wait you mean my VCR isn't supposed to be blinking 12:00?

    2. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by MyHair · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wait you mean my VCR isn't supposed to be blinking 12:00?

      No, you should buy a newer one like mine that displays --:-- without flashing.


      (Yes, I know how to program it. I just haven't done it since last power outage. And yes, some newer ones set the time themselves.)

    3. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by shmokey · · Score: 1

      i was just hinking that same thing. If you are reading slashdot you ALREADY KNOW how to do a clean install/defrag of any modern OS.

      --
      http://samtron.cjb.net
    4. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by pod · · Score: 1

      And no, I don't adjust the time on it every 2 weeks. An appliance that has a clock should:
      - keep time well, not let it drift an hour a week
      - know what time zone I'm in so I don't have change the time on EVERYTHING with a clock every 6 months.

      Just look at your average living area:
      - clock in microwave
      - clock in stove
      - clock in fridge (soon to be common-place?)
      - clock in VCR
      - clock in TV
      - clock in bedroom TV
      - clock in ... clock (duh, you gotta wake up for work on time :)
      - clock in computer (bios and os)
      - clock in computer 2
      - clock in switch
      - clock in router
      - clock in wrist watch (nice sector for every day)
      - clock in wrist watch (timex ironman for hiking/camping)
      - probably clock in several other devices

      Do I need to be able to tell time from half dozen clocks at any given time? Probably not. Are they all accurate? Definitely not. Do they all need clocks? Most assuredly not.

      --
      "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    5. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by Blkdeath · · Score: 1
      - clock in microwave
      - clock in stove
      - clock in fridge (soon to be common-place?)

      My stove timers operate independant of the actual date/time, and my stove doesn't have or need a clock. Appliance clocks are a nice vanity, but far from critical. After a power outage, they get set when someone is staring at it and bored for ten seconds.

      - clock in VCR
      - clock in TV
      - clock in bedroom TV
      - clock in ... clock (duh, you gotta wake up for work on time :)

      The former three mostly set themselves, but I don't require television clocks since I've already got one on the VCR, cable box, etc. The latter has a 9V backup battery that'll hold the time, alarm time, and keep the alarm functional (read: "Going off") for several hours; days if I don't use the alarm.

      - clock in computer (bios and os)
      - clock in computer 2
      - clock in switch
      - clock in router

      NTP.

      - clock in wrist watch (nice sector for every day)
      - clock in wrist watch (timex ironman for hiking/camping)

      I set my watches exactly twice/year. Once when entering Daylight Savings and once when leaving. Modern watches even have knowledge of DST so that's no longer an issue.

      BTW - you forgot clocks in car stereos.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    6. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by webhead74 · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm.... power outage? Doesn't everyone run their VCR through a UPS??

    7. Re:Windows Home Users tips... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Doesn't everyone run their VCR through a UPS??

      As a geek I'm ashamed to admit my computer isn't even on a UPS. (I want a good one but can't part with the money.)

      However, every piece of electronics more expensive than a clock radio is on a surge protector.

      When I was a field tech a power transformer exploded (yes, chunks of metal everywhere) outside a client's warehouse in my territory. Every last surge protector was blown, but the electronic/computer equipment survived with no problems. The few pieces of equipment that weren't on surge protectors were fried. (I tried pressing the reset switch one of the better surge protectors, but it just buzzed when I turned it on so I shut it off quickly and replaced it.)

      That very evening I bought surge protectors for my TVs, VCRs, radios and such.

      By the way, not all power strips are surge protectors. Read the label. And replace them when the protection light is no longer steady.

  8. What? by SharpFang · · Score: 1, Funny

    "How to make some room on your hard drive"? Is that what Slashdot writes about nowadays? - The editors must be on crack!

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:What? by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      It's Sunday. That's why :)

    2. Re:What? by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      They're just trying to increase their potential market to include all the kids that are just getting their first computer. That's nothing to be worried about right now. It'll be at least 6 months till they launch needlepoint.slashdot.org, that's when I'm jumping ship.

    3. Re:What? by villain170 · · Score: 1


      We could see some grandma's doing some nasty clothing mods!

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    4. Re:What? by RLiegh · · Score: 1

      ascii goatse...in needlepoint? Ugh, I think I can wait for that one!

  9. What backup? by nottestuser · · Score: 4, Funny

    eMule is my backup.

    1. Re:What backup? by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 1

      Especially for all those important, unique, or sensitive documents of yours...?

  10. Stop! Don't Do it. by aoteoroa · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From the article:
    Then you turn your computer off, put the operating system CD into the drive and turn the computer back on. Following the on-screen instructions, you wipe the hard drive clean and let the operating system reinstall itself from scratch
    I find it hard to believe that people are still advising full reinstalls of an operating system as part of regular maintenance. This just isn't necessary (sp?) any more. You can probably get the same performance increase by reorganizing your files, and defragging the harddrive.

    A full reinstall risks loss of data. One example is your email. Outlook express buries its data somewhere in c:\windows\application data\ . Most people don't back up the windows directory and risk losing their email when performing a complete reinstall. Windows 2000, and XP are stable enough that rebuilding the system every 6 months is no longer a best practice. The only good time to reinstall the OS is if there is something wrong with it. For example if you have downloaded some strange porn-viewer.exe that has fsked everything up a reinstall should be your last resort option.

  11. Reinstall your software? by Master+Bait · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Surely the author jests! Look at your Windows Applications with the date showing and you'll see that they don't write to themselves. But don't those Win apps all have some sort of 'ini' file which DOES get written to, and then left open when the app crashes?. Don't those Win people have apps that will permit them to edit ini files?

    And the author's techniques do not apply to Macs or Linux. Obviously the author is merely a journalist, and not a computer expert.

    --
    "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
    --Tom Schulman
    1. Re:Reinstall your software? by NineNine · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Obviously you're not an author. I didn't understand a single sentence of your post.

    2. Re:Reinstall your software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you're a retarded pornographer.

    3. Re:Reinstall your software? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what you just said.

  12. Not quite time yet... by eet23 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I very rarely delete things. I always worry that I'll want the file again soon, and backing it up to CD is too much bother right now.

    I have 14GB in ~/, and I've still got another 20GB to go before I need to delete some useless files or get a new HD. But at the rate of increase, I may well have a new computer by then anyway.

    Incidentally, of that 14GB, about 10MB is actually important, and that is backed up.

    1. Re:Not quite time yet... by villain170 · · Score: 1


      What happens if your HD goes kaput???

      Having all the "extra" space won't really bring back all your old stuff. :(

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    2. Re:Not quite time yet... by eet23 · · Score: 1

      If things go pop, I restore the things I did back up, reinstall the operating system and applications from CD, download things from the internet as I need them and forget about the junk. (Part of the bloat comes from not deleting foo.tar and foo.tar.gz when I download and unarchive something.

    3. Re:Not quite time yet... by villain170 · · Score: 1


      Wow. I thought I was the only one that kept the archives just in case. After I install something, I hang on to the install package so that if I accidentally zap the application I can re-install from the package.

      --

      I am over here... now I am back over here!
    4. Re:Not quite time yet... by Glytch · · Score: 1

      I also keep the original archives, though I've gotten lazy recently and have about 1800 files in ~/programs/linux/unsorted. CDRs are cheap enough nowadays, so I archive everything I ever download.

      One of my dreams in life is to build a personal multi-terabyte fileserver, so that I don't have to go hunting through hundreds of CDRs for an obscure file when I need it. Once I get the funds, of course. :)

    5. Re:Not quite time yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Heh, you have "unsorted"-directories as well? :)

      When I start spending too much time in the unsorted-directories instead of where data should be, it's time for some spring cleaning.

    6. Re:Not quite time yet... by croddy · · Score: 1
      usually when I want to reinstall something all I have to run is "make install". ~/download/tarballs has all the .tar.gz's and the complete trees they unpack!

      yeah I've got so much HD space I dont even know what to do with it. that will change, I fear, with the big dump of WAVs that ardour's going to put down this summer.

  13. I'm blind by Fireshadow · · Score: 1

    Quote: "When there's too much on your hard drive, you'll have a harder time finding things when you need them..." Was anyone else blinded by this flash of the obvious?

    --
    "It's one thing to talk about the poetry of machines. Quite another to listen to it for yourself."
  14. spring cleaning by grantsellis · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine cleaning a beowulf cluster of these ;)

    1. Re:Spring Cleaning by Poofat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Russian drives are "purged."

    2. Re:Spring Cleaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russian drives have 5 year plans

  15. LFS by gspr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As Linux From Scratch is rather hard to maintain anyway (rebuilding a library at the bottom often causes problems for stuff linked against it), it is common to "reLFS", that is build an entirely new LFS on another partition on your harddrive. One builds the very latest of everything, and then moves all config files and stuff over from the old system. When I move over my personal stuff, I tend to be veeeery strict with myself, and "leave behind" a lot of things (to die under the hand of mke2fs). That way, my system gets a total spring cleaning rather often, and the system is updated.

    1. Re:LFS by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      I used to use LFS, and "reLFSing" is the main problem I had with it. It was a great learning experience, but now I'm using Gentoo for day to day use.

    2. Re:LFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For webhosting, this is ideal. Check out Plesk Server Administrator.

  16. How do people manage this? by Poofat · · Score: 1

    From the article - "Now start that word processor, try that Web browser: I bet you'll see that they start sooner and run faster, with fewer crashes. If only a carwash had as much effect on car performance." How do people manage to fill their computers with so much junk that their web browser crashes? It really boggles the mind.

    1. Re:How do people manage this? by Soulfarmer · · Score: 1

      And what kind of hardware is the author talking about, if he really thinks that less files on hard drive is going to make noticeable difference on how fast word processor or web browser works. I mean, the marginals seem to be bit too thin for my thinking.

      If I "cleanup" my system, I would be disappointed if the Word would go any faster. Since it would mean that my machine is dependent on how much free space it got. And with my RAID 0+1, no need for manual backups...

      --
      -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    2. Re:How do people manage this? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Virii and Spyware my friend...
      That, along with so many plugins and no defragmentation does that.

      Sad really.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    3. Re:How do people manage this? by Tyrdium · · Score: 1

      Thanks... You just inspired me to install Ad-aware, Spybot, and Proximitron... What firewall and virus programs would you suggest?

    4. Re:How do people manage this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virii and Spyware my friend...

      Plural if "virus" is "viruses." Virii is completely incorrect.

    5. Re:How do people manage this? by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      How do people manage to fill their computers with so much junk that their web browser crashes? It really boggles the mind.

      Are you using windows? With the exception of NT, it doesn't take much to crash any prog... I have computers that don't even connect to the net that can crash ie (local browsing and such).

      Windows not crashing, now that boggles the mind...

    6. Re:How do people manage this? by numark · · Score: 1

      ZoneAlarm (the free version, not the Pro) and TrendMicro's PC-Cillin (AVG and Norton AV are also good if you want something that's a little easier to find in stores or, in AVG's case, that you can download online).

      --
      Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
    7. Re:How do people manage this? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I KNEW someone was going to pull out their dick and wave it about!

      You are the lucky winner! Anyway, English language dictates that two sounds together that sound remarkably alike should be changed to 'i' sound.

      No, I'm not going to argue with you, you'll just have to accept that some of us don't say it the way you do.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    8. Re:How do people manage this? by croddy · · Score: 1

      I think you mean that english has inherited a lot of latin plurals. the rule of "two sounds together that sound remarkably alike should be changed to 'i' sound" is what's called a false backformation. viruses is perfectly acceptable. virii is also acceptable, but rarer.

    9. Re:How do people manage this? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, exactly what you said.

      Thanks for adding more depth to what I said.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  17. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by gregmac · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, I think that anyone that uses windows as a general-purpose PC (ie, many different purposes, always installing apps and changing hardware) over a long period of time will eventually need to do a fresh install to get rid of everything. Between spyware, old drivers, utility apps (QuickFinder, Screen Resolution Changer, etc) and flakey uninstall programs, it just gets to the point where it is physically impossible to maintain a nice working system.

    The windows registry is one cause of this.. it's a huge unmanagable beast, with many ways to have things load and hook in to various operations.

    On the other hand, using it as a business system or for a specialized task where you aren't constantly changing configurations, then you probably have more chance of a long-term install working properly. But I wold imagine most /.ers would fit in the former, here. I sure do.

    --
    Speak before you think
  18. Balancing acts with cheap new drives by nick_davison · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For me it comes down to a balance...

    A pile of CDs ($2), several hours of an IT professional's time (mine) spent backing stuff up (3x$30-50/hr), the pain in the ass when you managed to miss something vs. that shiny new hard drive ($80).

    On a straight time and cost equation, it's reached the point where it's now cheaper to buy a new drive and have a complete backup whenever I want one (plus a fully booting system I know at least semi-worked whenever I break my main one). Six months, or however much, later, if I'm sure I don't need that backup version, instead of a bunch of full CDRs, I've got an extra drive for a toy Linux box.

    Then again, the geek factor of getting to fiddle with the minutae kicks in. (Although the extra drives for toy Linux boxes appeal)

    If I'm short of time, buying a new drive ultimately works out cheaper. If I've not met my geekiness quota recently, fiddling's more fun.

    1. Re:Balancing acts with cheap new drives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing wrong with a box or cdr's. Do your fiddling while Nero burns....

  19. Spring Cleaning the Debian way by mcgroarty · · Score: 4, Informative
    Debian users could make good use of "deborphan" and "cruft" for a little hard drive spring cleaning.

    deborphan will show which library packages are installed but not referenced by any apt-managed package. If you're reasonably sure you aren't building any unmanaged packages, you can just "dpkg -r `deborphan`" a couple times to remove any spurious libraries.

    cruft will show all files not recognized by Debian. Capture to a file and filter it through a chain of a few grep -v statements for areas you know you want left alone. You'll get a list of files you can toss in pretty short order.

    1. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by mackstann · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cool, didn't know about cruft. Try "debfoster" too, helps you get rid of all of that crap you installed on a whim and don't use anymore.

    2. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      #dpkg -r `deborphan`
      bash: /usr/sbin/dpkg: Argument list too long

      Uhh, what now?

    3. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by amoe · · Score: 4, Informative
      Uhh, what now?

      This:

      $ deborphan | xargs dpkg -r
      --
      You look beautiful! Incidentally, my favourite artist is Picasso.
    4. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Dude, you just made my Friends list. :)

      Thanks for the tip.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    5. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

      Yes, thanks for the tips. I've been using Debian for years and probably don't even know but 1% of these nice features.

      --
      The ratio of people to cake is too big
    6. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      Well, hot damn. :)

      I just spent an hour with debfoster and knocked nearly 20% off my /usr size!

    7. Re:Spring Cleaning the Debian way by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

      yep, or...

      orphaner --purge

      i usually try to delete all the development packages possible... (i just did that after a hdd-install of knoppix)

      dpkg -l | grep '\-dev'

      and remove all the ones on that list...

  20. Spring Cleaning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Russia you do not clean the drive, Russian drives never need cleaning, only American drives are corrupt.

  21. In the case of Windows ME and XP... by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...More often than not, it's all those System Restore points that are using up gigabytes of space (unless you're uber and have that service disabled). Just about every time you update a driver, XP will make a restore point for you, even if you don't ask for one. Thankfully, you can make XP get rid of all but the most recent:

    Go to My Computer, right-click on your XP drive/partition, click Properties, click the Disk Cleanup button to the bottom right of the pie chart, click the More Options tab, click the bottom "Clean up" button and click OK. I do that about once a week and free up at least 100MB each time.

    The disk cleanup applet will take care of the majority of system cruft. I don't know why people wipe and reinstall so often, it's really not necessary. When people talk to me about "random .DLLs and junk files" they sound like someone extolling the virtue of the Intel chip because it's more "compatible and stable" than an AMD chip. I.e., locked into stale notions of a computer's capabilities. I would recommend Norton's system cleaning utilites before I recommend a full wipe.

    Mostly, the gradual system slowdown people experience as they add programs over time is due to excess baggage like startup programs and unneccesary services. Check your system tray, hit CTRL+ALT+DEL and check your services list. You don't need WinAmp Agent, Mozilla QuickStart, or anything that automatically starts up anyway when you click on a multimedia file.

    And check out This excellent page for getting rid of half of the services you never use anyway.

    And use BootVis. It will clean up your boot time. Maybe a lot.

    1. Re:In the case of Windows ME and XP... by Captain+Beefheart · · Score: 2, Informative

      I should clarify that BootVis doesn't work with Windows ME (as far as I know). Only works with XP.

    2. Re:In the case of Windows ME and XP... by swankypimp · · Score: 1

      System Restore sucks! My sister had me look at her Win ME machine, which was crashing and rebooting randomly. An antivirus scan revealed a virus in the System Restore directory. Files in this directory cannot be deleted normally; you have to disable System Restore and reboot, then re-enable it to automatically delete the saved Restore files-- not something a normal computer user would figure out. Heck, it took me a good twenty minutes to diagnose and fix. One would think that Windows would restrict what apps can write to the special, undeleteable restore directory, though I guess that would be expecting a bit much. I guess that's why they call them Viruses, rather than Happy Fun Programs That Give You Sexual Pleasure and Sugary Easter Candy. (I like candy.)

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
  22. Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by rob-fu · · Score: 1

    rm $PORTAGE_TMPDIR/*
    emerge -u world

    hmm. did I forget anything?

    1. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      hmm. did I forget anything?
      rm -r /usr/portage/distfiles

    2. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you forgot to mention that Gentoo users don't get finished cleaning until the Summer.

    3. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      emerge depclean -p

    4. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, but you still have all those pesky personal config files lying around. And emerge -u world doesn't rebuild existing packages, so you might have a stale dependency here and there and inconsistant USE flags here and there. emerge -e world might do a better job or if not then emerge --deep -u world. Also a backup of $HOME and rm -rf ~/.[a-zA-Z]* then restore of needed configs might be a good idea once in a while.

    5. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA that's funny because Gentoo sucks and it is a "poser" distro that all the l33t script-kiddiez use because, hey, "Linux is neat-o!"

      But with a REAL and MATURE distribution, like Debian GNU/Linux, all I need to do is

      apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade && apt-get autoclean

      W00T!

    6. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehm, How about 'emerge rsync' before doing a useless 'emerge -u world'?

    7. Re:Spring Cleaning the Gentoo Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      last night I did up2date && ifdown ppp0. remarkably, when I woke up, ppp0 was down, and all was well.

  23. More free space != faster, stabler performance by lkaos · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This is something that serious ergs me as so many people believe it. The amount of available free space does not affect system performance or stability in anyway shape or form. Your system will run just as well with 10MB of free space verses 10GB of free space(*). The only time you should ever be affected is when trying to write more data than you have. Even writes are not faster with more disk space except in usual circumstances since writes are buffered by the operating system.

    (*) These numbers are true on Unix but less true on Windows. Depending on your type of file system, you should have either 2*RAM free or 2*RAM rounded up to the nearest power of two available (for fat or ntfs respectively). For some stupid reason, swap space is stored in a regular file system by Windows (instead of in it's own partition on Unix) so it is possible to run out of memory more frequently if you have less disk space available in Windows (although keep in mind that running out of memory is not that same as slow performance).

    --
    int func(int a);
    func((b += 3, b));
    1. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      (*) These numbers are true on Unix but less true on Windows.

      This is an important distinction, but Linux/Unix will still have problems when running out of space. Using pipes or applications that use temporary files will be adversely affected on either system if space is low. In any case, 10MB on a modern system is not enough for trouble-free operation. In the case of Unix/Linux, having not enough free space will cause problems with running X, logging, user logins, etc..

    2. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by frohike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your system will run just as well with 10MB of free space verses 10GB of free space.

      This isn't true on Unix either, but for a different reason. See the BSD manpage for tunefs for a hint:

      -m minfree
      Specify the percentage of space held back from normal users; the minimum free space threshold. The default value used is 8%. This value can be set to zero, however up to a factor of three in throughput will be lost over the performance obtained at a 10% threshold. Settings of 5% and less force space optimization to always be used which will greatly increase the overhead for file writes. Note that if the value is raised above the current usage level, users will be unable to allocate files until enough files have been deleted to get under the higher threshold.

      This is one of the reasons why Unix has always had a "reserve space for root", besides making sure things like logfiles can get written even if a user screws up.

      Newer FSes like reiserfs don't have this option anymore (last I checked anyway), so maybe they are more efficient about it. I've never seen any Linux docs make a similar claim, but I'd imagine that however it's implemented having a small amount of free space is also going to force higher block fragmentation.

    3. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by GiMP · · Score: 1

      This popular myth has been borne of several real problems, especially for users of DOS and Windows which use the FAT filesystems.

      FAT is prone to defragmentation. The longer since you've 'defragged' or reformatted, the slower your disk accesses will be. Many newbies are unfamiliar with defragging their drives and for them they only notice that removing programs helps gain speed.

      FAT is simply not a good filesystem for large amounts of data. Checkout the following document for a nice intro:
      http://people.msoe.edu/~taylor/cs384/steph anb.pdf

    4. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Newer FSes like reiserfs don't have this option anymore (last I checked anyway), so maybe they are more efficient about it. I've never seen any Linux docs make a similar claim, but I'd imagine that however it's implemented having a small amount of free space is also going to force higher block fragmentation.

      ReiserFS performance will suffer when disk usage is greater than 85%.

    5. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      This is something that serious ergs me as so many people believe it.

      C'mon, man! This is the 21st Century -- you should be using SI units, a la: This is something that serious Joules me as so many people believe it.

      Sheesh!

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    6. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Reziac · · Score: 1

      "The amount of available free space does not affect system performance or stability in anyway shape or form. Your system will run just as well with 10MB of free space verses 10GB of free space(*)."

      Sorry, but that's not true. If you'd said "100 mb or 1 gig" that would be more realistic. Many programs write temporary files, or use cache space that's not part of the swapfile, and if your free space is extremely cramped, you'll have problems, which may produce an entirely irrelevant error message, or at worst a crash. Since the user does not normally SEE these tempfiles being written, they won't think of the space needed to write them (as apparently you don't).

      Second, when defragging, less than 50mb or so of free space will drastically slow down the process, or cause chronic restarts. And fragmentation is the #1 reason why DOS/Win boxes slow down over time. Why discourage the user from this basic maintenance by making it take longer than it needs to??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by lkaos · · Score: 1

      And fragmentation is the #1 reason why DOS/Win boxes slow down over time.

      This is just not true! Please, give one reason why fragmentation could ever slow down a computer.

      This is probably computer myth number one as far as I'm concerned.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    8. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Reziac · · Score: 1

      On a fragmented disk, the read head has to run all over to collect all of a file's scattered body parts. It takes significant time compared to reading the entire file at a single crack. It's more noticeable on slower systems with slower HDs (to the point that you can actually time the effects, hence become aware that gross fragmentation can reduce performance by as much as ~70%). But just because you don't notice it so much on your 3GHz box with super-fast new HDs doesn't mean you shouldn't defrag newer systems too.

      Another thing -- a lot of random crashes are the result of too much fragmentation. It can actually get to the point where a browser will not run stable for more than a few minutes.

      I managed to demo that to a friend who hates Windows so refused to do any maintenance. Had got to where neither IE nor NS would run reliably, and the whole system slogged along like it was wearing lead overshoes, and crashed at the least excuse. Poor thing hadn't been defragged in three years. So I defragged it, and everything that ailed it was instantly fixed.

      Refusing to defrag is right up there with refusing the change the oil and filter in your car... sure, you can keep topping it off forever and it will still run, but that does nothing for the accumulated dirt that's wearing out the engine before its time.

      Many a time I've had a client complain that their relatively computer has "gotten so SLOW, and now it crashes all the time" -- where the ONLY thing needed to return it to crisp and stable performance was -- you guessed it, defragging.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by lkaos · · Score: 1

      On a fragmented disk, the read head has to run all over to collect all of a file's scattered body parts. It takes significant time compared to reading the entire file at a single crack. It's more noticeable on slower systems with slower HDs (to the point that you can actually time the effects, hence become aware that gross fragmentation can reduce performance by as much as ~70%). But just because you don't notice it so much on your 3GHz box with super-fast new HDs doesn't mean you shouldn't defrag newer systems too.

      Fragmentation shouldn't be noticable 90% of the time. Let's take a look at common usages of the filesystems:

      1) exe, dll loading
      In windows, executables are mmap'd and therefore loaded on demand. With a generous amount of read-ahead, it would be rare to be reading much more than a couple pages at a time. Given this, as long as the fragmentation isn't so bad that you're blocks are 40k could not be found. As for reducing stability, well, unless IE has some secret access path to the filesystem, that just makes absolutely no sense.

      Are you familar with the placebo effect? Perhaps you only _think_ that things are more stable because you mistaken believe defragging is useful.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    10. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Reziac · · Score: 1

      This is no placebo effect. The difference was literally "Netscape can't run for 5 minutes without crashing" and "Netscape never crashed again" -- on viewing the exact same pages. I think this boils down to the cache being fragmented to the point that the system runs out of virtual file handles. (Hence why the old "clear your cache" recommendation to fix anything that ailed a browser was always only a *temporary* fix; the *real* issue was a badly fragmented cache.)

      Anyone who thinks defragging does performance no benefit really, REALLY needs to suffer for a few months with an old hard disk with a 20ms or longer access time, and I think you'll change your tune. The improvement becomes flamingly obvious.

      Just because it's not so evident on new fast systems doesn't mean it's become a total non-issue.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:More free space != faster, stabler performance by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh, and read this:

      http://eletters.wnn.ziffdavis.com/zd/cts?d=75-17 -1 -1-612574-448-1 (beware the slashdot space)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  24. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by jeeves99 · · Score: 0

    You are right for novice users, but what about the typical slashdotter who fiddles with their settings and is constantly dragging around huge divx movies or iso's?

    "You can probably get the same performance increase by reorganizing your files, and defragging the harddrive." What are you basing this HUGE assumption on?

    My iBook running OS X had taken such a pounding for nearly a year and was lagging despite defrags and uninstalls. I reformatted and reinstalled and now my system is MUCH more responsive. The same goes for a couple of my office linux boxes and my home winXP computer. I agree that typical maintenance should be limited to defrag and uninstall, but yearly maintenance should definitely include a reformat.

  25. "Real men don't use backups, by akedia · · Score: 4, Funny

    they post their stuff on a public ftp server and let the rest of the world make copies."

    (A quote from your hero and mine, Linus Torvalds.)

    1. Re:"Real men don't use backups, by The+J+Kid · · Score: 1

      Very funny Linus, now ftp up my clothes.

      ^_^

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  26. Accept nothing less than... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... a zeroing. Zeroing is the best way to clean up a HDD. And it's crazy fun ;o)

  27. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Chronowerx · · Score: 1

    You can't beat a fresh install every year - and now winows XP has the files & settings transfer wizard, you can simply run this to a few cd's, or another HDD without the root directory on and after you have wiped & reinstalled the OS, it will set up all your e-mail accounts, files, prOn etc... Very little hassle really - except the fact that windows will tie up your modem for the next week downloading updates again...

  28. The Mac by weston · · Score: 1

    The Mac is still easier to use, a distinction it has kept for almost 20 years now.

    To use? Maybe. It still does seem to keep some slight edges of being more well-thought out, in my opinion.

    But I think it's not so much day-to-day use that's easier, it's administration. And that's what I think that many people forget... the kind of thing this article is talking about is, essentially, system administration, something that your average user sucks at. Make that easier, make it transparent, and you've made the easier to use machine.

    1. Re:The Mac by zogger · · Score: 1

      Both. My old mac classic is still easier to use than linux or any windows I ever tried, for me anyway. Never had to reinstall the OS. Once in awhile I ran norton disk doctor, that was it, like every few months. The only problems I ever had with it-that's just ME, I'm sure other people experienced other bad things happening- were netscape freezes. Then I switched to iCab and stopped getting freezes. I'd still be using it but it won't hold enough ram anymore for modern multimedia and a lot of web pages apparently, locked at 64 megs max, which it has. It's just slow to use now, but stability wise it's the same as ever, it just works. If I wanted to I could get the daughter card G3 cpu upgrade, but I won't pay 3 or 400$ for that, that's just nuts. 99$, maybe, I'd think about it. If they ever drop the prices down I'll get a card, until then, oh well. PB 1400, BTW.

    2. Re:The Mac by truenoir · · Score: 1

      For things that the article was talking about, yes, it's *far* easier. The author mentioned installing/uninstalling programs. In OSX, many apps are abstracted to a single icon (which is really a package containing however many files). You can use it from whatever location, move it, use it again, put in the trash, pull it back out to a different location...still works. No .dlls, no libraries you haven't installed yet. Just works. Even Office v.X installs by dragging and dropping the application folder. Sure, some apps use installers...but they still work fine after wiping the system. You can't say that about many apps under Windows, since .dlls get wiped out. I haven't tried it in OSX, but in OS9, some apps you could move while they were running with no ill effects. Other apps could have the executable moved (say to the desktop) and work fine. There are other things still that are simpler. Network access in OSX is a simple Go->Connect to Server... command. One click. Windows XP (default setup) is what, Start Button->My Computer->My Network Place (on the sidebar)->Entire Network->Microsoft Windows Network (or something like that, I won't put XP on my machine). You're correct abuot basically, the MacOS tends to be better though out. Windows got *more* complicated from 2k. Their UI people should be shot for stuff like that. Or the start bar vs. the dock. Now, I like certain aspects of the start bar better myself, however, the dock is simpler and "easier". On the start bar, I can potentially have an app in 4 "unique" places. In the quicklaunch, in the system tray (for some apps anyway), in the start menu itself, and if it's running, on the start bar. In the dock, it's one icon, running or not. Either OS can have desktop shortcuts or whatever. Anyway, point is that I see plenty of things where the MacOS is easier to use than Windows for the end user. Honestly, there are things in Windows that I find more convenient because I'm used to them working that way or because there are more options, but still, that's because of experience, not the OS.

  29. Yes! Do it, darnit! by TrekkieGod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you know what you're doing (as in, not the type of thing that should be posted in an article for novices, although he did include a warning) doing a clean install can have a *much* greater performance advantage in windows--including windows xp. Heck, from what I observed with my computer, I'd do it every 3 months...although every 6 months is good enough for most heavy users and every year should be good enough for the rest of the population.

    The trick is knowing what you want to backup, and making absolutely sure that you have it in places that you'd normally back up anyway. If possible, keep all data files in a separate partition so you can just format the one where windows and the installed programs are. I'd never back up the windows directory (that's where most of the trash that I want to get rid of is), but I changed the outlook directory to "E:\My Documents\mail" (yes, I changed the my documents directory to the "data" partition as well). If you don't have a separate partition, keep a checklist of every directory that you need to backup, and save everything that you would want to backup to those directories.

    The only good time to reinstall the OS is if there is something wrong with it.

    Not really, sometimes there's something wrong with your system and the best way to truly fix it is by doing the clean install thing. Try running adaware and see how much spyware is installed. Then there are viruses...I've never had problems with them, but a friend of mine recently ran a scan and found 9 viruses in his computer, and his only detectable symptom was the computer would lock up often.

    Basically, what I'm trying to say with all this is that, if you're careful, you can safely do clean installs without risking the loss of any data at all, and the benefits are much greater than "reorganizing and defragging". And to those who will undoubtly respond...yes, I know, I've never had the need to do frequent clean installs with my linux partition either.

    One final advice for all you novices who are going to take the risk and do this for the first time. Don't follow these instructions:

    Then you turn your computer off, put the operating system CD into the drive and turn the computer back on.

    For god's sake...don't force your cdrom open when the computer is off. Just turn it on and plop the cd in there first thing, while in the bios screen :)

    --

    Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    1. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by skt · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, seeing as how this article is targeted at the average user, doing a clean install should be left out. As someone else has mentioned, a clean install has no place in any kind of regular computer maintenance schedule for the average user. Now for the rest of us, we won't be reading the newspaper to figure out the best ways to do maintenance.

      As you mention, separation of OS and data using partitions gives you quite a bit of flexibility when doing repairs (OS mysteriously implodes, scanner software kills machine, etc). But, there is an important difference between repairs and maintenance. Maintenance means you are cleaning/tuning a functioning computer, perhaps backing up files, removing stale desktop shortcuts, reorganizing files, etc. This means that your computer is NOT crashing and slow.. like the article says. Repairs are when something bad is happening, maybe your computer's performance is slow or the machine blue screens twice a day.. then you need to restore the machine's state to one in which it was functioning properly.. possibly using a clean install.

      I think they have good ideas for general system maintenance, cleaning the desktop, programs listing, and re-arranging data into one root data folder (after a full data backup). But, they seem to mix two different problems into one story, and giving some irresponsible advice in the process. The article implies that it will be some kind of "spring cleaning" for your computer, to the average reader this means that computer at home they use to check email and surf the web with. Then they go onto mention that the reader should consider a clean install as part of their "spring cleaning" (yes, I know there is a warning, but why even mention it?).

      Through my own experience as a user and computer tech, it is my conclusion that Windows NT-based systems do not need to be rebuilt annually like 9x used to under average use. People who simply use their computers as a means to an end (who are actually a good target for the article), do not install a lot of third-party software. They simply sit in front of their pre-configured machines at home and use the thing. The other types of users are the ones that usually end up doing clean installs of their operating system, those are the ones that like to tinker with their systems. If you know enough to be dangerous, you will be doing this on a regular basis. If you know what kind of software poses a risk to your computer, then you will be able to tinker with your computer for many years without the need for a re-install, providing you are using a modern operating system.

    2. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If possible, keep all data files in a separate partition so you can just format the one where windows and the installed programs are.

      Yes! Very good idea. Put your data/movies/mp3/porn on a fat drive, and win on ntfs, and then your linux dist on another drive, and share the fat. If one OS craps out, you have a backup.

    3. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The only good time to reinstall the OS is if there is something wrong with it.

      Not really, sometimes there's something wrong with your system and the best way to truly fix it is by doing the clean install thing.

      Uh, that's exactly what he said. There's something wrong with your system, and you fix it be reinstalling.

    4. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but that's not how I interpreted this at the time.

      The only good time to reinstall the OS is if there is something wrong with it. For example if you have downloaded some strange porn-viewer.exe that has fsked everything up a reinstall should be your last resort option.

      In my interpretation, that "fsked everything up" scenario is the scenario where your computer is unusable...you get blue screen of deaths when you're booting up, only way you get access to your stuff is by going to safe mode, etc. I figured that with things such as spyware and viruses, he'd let adaware and his favorite virus scan handle the problem, since the clean install is the last resort option. I, on the other hand, prefer to be more thorough once the accumulated trash in my computer reaches a certain level. Thus I made the distinction between "something wrong with your OS", ie, you can't boot up or do anything useful to your computer with "something wrong with your system", which could be a severe lack of performance, and you don't know the reasons exactly.

      No disrepect intended to the original poster and his intentions. I saw a distinction, posted according to my interpretation, and unfortunately wasn't clear enough to avoid a misunderstanding in my own post. Sorry about that, hope I was able to clear it up this time.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    5. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      They simply sit in front of their pre-configured machines at home and use the thing. The other types of users are the ones that usually end up doing clean installs of their operating system, those are the ones that like to tinker with their systems. If you know enough to be dangerous, you will be doing this on a regular basis. If you know what kind of software poses a risk to your computer, then you will be able to tinker with your computer for many years without the need for a re-install, providing you are using a modern operating system.

      I'm going to have to say you're wrong. I've got a couple of cousins, who among normal users, browse and MSN chat. But they also download game demos, and download stuff off kazaa(like movies, games, etc).

      My 'lil cousins don't 'tinker' with their system, but the fact they use Kazaa opens their computer to a whole can of viruses, as it's not one central public server that hosts files but assholes who share viruses that look like Grandtheftauto3.exe and what not.

    6. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by h4ro1d · · Score: 1

      well i'm not a geek, pretty clueless actually. i do know, however, that running .exe files is just slightly less perilous than drinking the bottle that sez "drink me". You don't need to be a carpenter to know you need safety goggles when operating a nail gun.

    7. Re:Yes! Do it, darnit! by Alphtoo · · Score: 1

      Running Windows 98, and the only times I've had to do a clean reinstall were due to hardware failure or viruses. I have some good safeguards against both now... not foolproof, of course, but good. I'm thinking of upgrading to 2000 because I've used it at school and I like it pretty well, but I can't really fault Win98 for anything; it has served me very well. As for XP, it will NEVER run on any box I own. I don't like spyware. All the best, -Alph

  30. Defrag? by idfrsr · · Score: 1

    Why isn't defragging recommended? Admittedly, most of us 'in the know' are aware frequent defragging helps keep the HD organized... But its not mentioned in the article (unless I missed it in my quick glance). But even so I would think that it is much more important than a full re-install. Is it just because we have so much HD space these days that defragging is not necessary?

    --
    "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away" -Tom Waits
    1. Re:Defrag? by markogogo · · Score: 1

      But its not mentioned in the article (unless I missed it in my quick glance).

      Don't you have a find feature in your browser that searches a page for term(s)?

      And you're right - it wasn't mentioned. I regularly maintain less than 1GB of free space on my 20GB HD, even with all the removing and adding of files. If I notice sluggishness, I defrag and my computer is back to its normal self.

      I guess defrag isn't classified as "spring cleaning". Maybe it's just a "utility".

    2. Re:Defrag? by repetty · · Score: 1

      "Why isn't defragging recommended?"

      I guess a lot of people here are using Windows :)

      --Richard

    3. Re:Defrag? by Azureflare · · Score: 1
      Er, slight problem with defrags...It's not very healthy for the hard drive. You really shouldn't defrag more than once or twice a month (Depending on how heavily you use your computer) and even then, the fragmentation itself often isn't the cause of slow downs; it's usually those invisible files windows uses to keep track of your sessions (Yes, you can search on the internet, I don't know where the information on it is; I think files like NTUSER.dat and stuff do it; not sure. All I remember is when I followed instructions to delete my sessions, windows was like it had been right when I installed it! Of course I don't think I did it right, it made a new folder in the documents and settings directory for me).

      Also, I really haven't noticed that much of a speed difference when defragmenting drives. Maybe it's just because I don't use my windows computer much anymore.

      Now that I use ReiserFS, I'll find myself getting that urge to defrag, and for about half a minute I'll have this unconscious nagging; then I'll remember "OH it's not necessary!"

      It's funny, but I think I got addicted to defragmenting hard drives when I used windows as my main OS.

    4. Re:Defrag? by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      Defrag does NOT "organize" the hard drive, and per Microsoft, you don't need to defragment NTFS - it doesn't suffer the same penalties as FAT with fragmented files - you AREN'T still using FAT, are you? Defragging also does not save you a single byte of space.

      Back under your 1993 rock, Windows Troll!

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    5. Re:Defrag? by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Defrag does NOT "organize" the hard drive, and per Microsoft, you don't need to defragment NTFS - it doesn't suffer the same penalties as FAT with fragmented files - you AREN'T still using FAT, are you? Defragging also does not save you a single byte of space.

      Actually, defrag does save some space. If you have a small file fragmented that takes up 4k in say, 5 pieces, it will take up at least 5 clusters. As you know, clusters are groups of sectors that are the smallest size a file can take up.

      In FAT32, the cluster size for partitions under 8 gb is 4k. That means our tiny 4 k file in 5 pieces will take up 20k. (Of course, in real life, it's not that dramatic.)

      So, defragging defragments your files, putting them in neat areas of the HD. This can save quite a bit of space with little small files, although it doesn't make much of a difference with large files.

      Of course, NTFS doesn't need defragging very often. Because it is a journaling FS, it doesn't fragment files so much, and it has smaller cluster sizes.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    6. Re:Defrag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, slight problem with defrags...It's not very healthy for the hard drive...

      Riiiiight. Because reading and writing data is bad for your hard drive.

      People who defrag once a week or more run a smaller risk of killing the hard drive than do people who do things like FMV capture and 3d animation.

      Although, unless you're doing FMV or 3d animation, you probably won't need to defrag more than once a month.

      My head hurts.

    7. Re:Defrag? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Back when we carved our own computers out of wood, my 286 had a whopping 20mb HD (that's MEGS, not GIGS, for you young'uns) and at $40/mb or so, every byte was valuable. Defragging typically reclaimed 100k or more of free space (it had 8k clusters due to disk compression). As a percentage of total disk space basis, 100k was darned dramatic. (In fact, it could be a third of the total free space.)

      Now, multiply that by the size of current HDs... And consider the increasing trend toward ridiculously wasteful filesets, like the ton of tiny files installed by Mozilla (why can't those all be referenced from one ZIP or read from a single concatenated file? We commonly did this in the DOS era, to save on slack space.)

      As to why defragging has fallen out of fashion, partly ignorance, but partly that most people don't realise that Win9*'s "How fragmented are we?" reporting tool is broken, hence don't think the system needs it. AFAICT it reports FAT fragmentation, not FILE fragmentation; by the time it reports 3% fragmented, the disk is in fact around 80% fragmented. So users should ignore the report and defrag religiously once a week regardless.

      As to the notion that defragging is "hard" on your drive, I haven't heard THAT one in a while... but I suspect comes from the fact that if a drive is *already* failing, defrag is often when the first drastic symptom is seen (like the dreaded "not ready reading drive C" or "sector not found" errors).

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  31. poor advice by g4dget · · Score: 1

    CDs are no good for backup anymore--way too small. Get yourself an external USB2 drive for backup and just copy over everything, then put it away in a safe and secure place, far away from the computer.

    Don't reinstall "just because". Yes, Windows XP installs still have problems with falling apart after a while, but less so than it used to be. Yes, applications on Windows still sometimes uninstall poorly (or not at all), but less so than it used to be. Generally, you are OK and disk drives are big enough that you can accumulate dead Windows bits with no ill effects much longer than you used to be able to.

    Of course, with something like Debian Linux, there is no need to reinstall ever because both applications and the operating system are managed by the package manager and even broken things tend to correct themselves with the next update (or can be corrected manually without a full reinstall).

    And whatever maintenance you perform, a little done frequently is better than a lot done all at once. Just like for dieting, exercise, and cleaning up the house.

    1. Re:poor advice by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      CDs are no good for backup anymore--way too small. Get yourself an external USB2 drive for backup and just copy over everything, then put it away in a safe and secure place, far away from the computer.

      How fast is USB2? I would have thought that an external firewire drive is faster, and firewire seems to be more and more common on PCs today (even my crappy little laptop has a port). Of course, if speed is not important (i.e., you are using the drive for occasional backup rather than day-to-day use), then USB2 may be cheaper.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:poor advice by g4dget · · Score: 1

      FireWire is, of course, fine, too. USB2 and FireWire are nominally roughly the same speed, and both are so much faster than the disk drive that any differences don't matter.

      For backup, even USB1 actually is fast enough: you just set it down and let it do its job in the background.

  32. Bachelorettes have the exact same problem by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Similarly, how many bachelor geeks have spent two hours doing dishes on an emergency basis before an important client or, god forbid, a member of the opposite sex is due to arrive.

    Ah, sexism at its best. Believe it or not, a number of my lady friends(ie, bachelorettes), have -exactly- the same problem. Folks, it ain't just guys who procrastinate cleaning up- women are just better at the last minute frenzied pickup :-)

    1. Re:Bachelorettes have the exact same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wanting your apartment to look nice so you don't scare off a woman is not sexism.

    2. Re:Bachelorettes have the exact same problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although you can easily chalk up the politically correct, knee-jerk sexism karma response here, I believe you are wrong about this (unless the original poster was lying to protect women and you knew it). I can honestly state that I have observed far more bachelors with sinks full of dirty dishes than bachelorettes. This may be bad data, but it is a valid personal observation, none the less. Women do not, in fact, behave exactly like men and it is not automatically an insult to women to say otherwise. Sexism at its best! In Soviet Russia dishes do you!

  33. Data Mirroring by torklugnutz · · Score: 1

    I'm just setting this up now, but what I've got in store for my mom's computer is this. a 120gb internal HD which uses some software (Ghost, Drive Image or something. I don't know exactly what to use yet and I'm open to suggestion. Solution has to be software though. No hardware RAID) to mirror her data to a 120GB external drive (USB 2.0). This way, in the event of a drive failure, she won't have to go through data recovery. Also, if she is planning on being away, she can store the external drive elsewhere or take it with her (in case of burglary or whatever).
    All of this facilitates rebuilding Windows. Full re-installs do still count. The Registry still gets out of hand after numberous installs and upgrades, IMHO.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
    1. Re:Data Mirroring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not hardware RAID? It would be the easiest solution. A PCI card providing mirroring is not too expensive, and it's transparent. Install the secondary drive in a swappable drive bay, and it could be removed and locked up when the computer wasn't in use.

    2. Re:Data Mirroring by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 1

      I setup my parents' PC into two partitions of equal size. I believe it was a 60 GB drive (which is about 50 GB more than they'll ever use). I bought them a copy of Drive Image and once in awhile when I am over they I run it. I backup the main partition to the other partition and chunk the backup into CD size chunks. I copy the backups to 5 CD-Rs and bring the backups home with me. In case of HD meltdown I'd be able to install a new one and restore Windows and everything else to exactly how it was when I made the backup.

      For day to day I setup a batch file to copy all their important data (i.e. email and some work documents) to a CD-RW using Nero's packet writing software.

      So far it works well. I've successfully restored a similar setup on my old machine when my HD died.

  34. My Method by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Funny

    All I really need for my spring cleaning is some Windex and an extra strong magnet. That should clean out my hard drive pretty quickly, no?

    1. Re:My Method by mackstann · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you'd have to find an insane magnet to do any harm. You do know that there are super-strong magnets right *inside* of the drive, don't you?

    2. Re:My Method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you do know the phrase "To literal minded to get the joke", don't you?
      Sheesh, lighten up...

    3. Re:My Method by mackstann · · Score: 1
      And you do know the phrase "To literal minded to get the joke", don't you? Sheesh, lighten up...

      I'm well aware it was a joke, I was just pointing out a little bit of info that alot of people have misconceptions about. Maybe you should lighten up : )

    4. Re:My Method by Seq · · Score: 1

      Ah, a fellow defraggler i see! My mother discs were very heavy this spring. much easier to carry after it was defraggled. http://www.datadocktorn.nu/us_frag1.php

      --
      -- Seq
  35. Isn't this stuff common sense to /.'ers ? by Rooked_One · · Score: 4, Funny
    I mean really... whats next - picking your nose for dummies?

    "Ah yes, the picking of the nose - a long practiced art started by arabs for digging sand out of their nasal cavities after those long caravans. The main trick to picking the nose is one simple rule: if it bleeds, you are picking it too much... or not enough."

  36. w00t by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    Somebody should write a howto! This article is most intruiging!

    Actually, no, it's teh sucks. Don't bother with it.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  37. oops by zumbojo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I opened up my hard drive casing and scoured the discs with a Brillo pad. Turns out that wasn't the best way to clean a HD. Next time I will read the article first.

    1. Re:oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's the twenty-first cetury. Just run it thru the dishwasher.

    2. Re:oops by andfarm · · Score: 1
      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

    3. Re:oops by andfarm · · Score: 1

      Whoops, screwed up the link. (Wrong TLD.) Try this one instead.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  38. A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by deragon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now, how many of you clean your keyboard the hard way, i.e. with a q-tip, trying to go between all the keys?

    Cmon, unscrew your keyboard's upper molding and wash your keyboard under water, no soap. This is what I do and it works well. I have done it last week with my two Logitech iTouch keyboards. They look like new. Yeah, so water spills over the electronics. So what? As long as the keyboard is not plugged while washing it, and that you let it dry properly on a hot dry day (I let them dry 24 hours to be sure), they will continue to work.

    Do not forget, water + electronics is not the problem, its water + electricity (off course, leaving your electronics for months under water, well, it might rust... Don't over do it. :) ) So go on, and clean your keyboards under the sink.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  39. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Arandir · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and defragging the harddrive.

    I use UFS2 you insensitive clod, I don't need to defrag my harddrive!

    --
    A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
  40. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is an option to have OE store email in a saner location of your choosing, incase anyone is interested.

  41. Do it right the first time... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I recieved the new laptop from work, I tore Windows 2000 apart into seperate bits and gave each their own partition (4 in total). (and I mean tear it apart at the "core", not just install programs to a different drive/partition) The system part, ie WINNT directory, stays defragged and clean, just like the Program Files directory. And it has proven itself seeing this thing runs 21 hours a day and I've messed with software a lot.

    --
    home
    1. Re:Do it right the first time... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Curious as to how you did this and organized it?

      I used to do that to office suites in the Win3.1 era, but with increasing in-suite integration, it's no longer practical. I never let anything put its main install under Program Files, tho.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Do it right the first time... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Typically
      ~1gb for swap
      ~5gb for install
      ~5gb for apps, etc
      ~10gb for temp downloads, the like
      ~rest = storage

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    3. Re:Do it right the first time... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      I added the howto here.

      --
      home
    4. Re:Do it right the first time... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was thinking you meant you'd dismangled W2K entirely and put its body parts on different partitions. But in fact you're doing more or less what I do. Tho since mine are all FAT32 (in the interest of interoperability) I make my partition sizes right up to the max without hitting the next cluster size up; with current HD sizes, typically some each of 8g, 16g, and whatever's left over. And I make the swap partition of similar size, since I archive a copy of the clean OS install(s) there too, and sometimes other stuff that needs to be archived but will never be moved or touched.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Do it right the first time... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Ah, nifty. Rather like the Win3.1 era, when I thought it was normal to root thru the registry and replace things to suit myself [g] And I've moved it to a new partition several times by the simple expedient of S&R drive letters.

      As of Win95 I've stopped separating OS and WinApps because I find it easier to organise them all on one partition, and I use "My Documents" as a sort of temporary dumping ground so don't really care where it is. But I still put swap and real data wherever I please. Myself, I start CDR* drives at R: I vaguely recall an old prohibition against using W/X/Y/Z as drive letters, maybe from Netware??

      BTW, if you alter W2K's swapfile location via the Admin tool, you may have to do registry delving to kill the old setting, since it has a bug that leaves the old setting intact, and then you find yourself with two or more swapfiles!!

      I'm not sure how well your method would work on XP either -- I suspect it has stuff hardcoded in strange places, that would persistently rewrite the registry settings (WinME suffers from that wrt boot config files, and XP apparently has a good deal of halfbaked WinME code pasted on top). I have XP installed rather than W2K by chance of what test machine was available when each came to hand, but if I had to choose one or the other as my everyday OS, it would surely be W2K.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    6. Re:Do it right the first time... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... I never had any trouble moving swapfiles, only on NT it could still demand a 2MB swapfile on the systemdrive. I moved it once by altering the registry, and even that was no problem. There is one prohibition against using Z: for a driveletter, and that is that Z: is the standard homeshare in an NT network. But since we use another letter for that, and even better, I am one of the admins I removed that drive altogether, it doesn't affect me. *grin*

      --
      home
    7. Re:Do it right the first time... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I didn't have any trouble moving W2K's swapfile, that particular setup just insisted on keeping the old one TOO, until I found where in the registry the extra was referenced (simple search for "pagefile" and kill any keys that pointed at wrong drives cured the issue). Other installs did no such thing. Makes you wonder!!

      I've seen both W2K and XP drop multiple swapfiles of various sizes on several partitions with a clean install, too. It doesn't happen every time, but often enough that it's evident there's a bug.

      XP can behave very differently on two supposedly-identical clean installs, too, for no visible reason. Frex, first install, 700mb, one pagefile on same partition as XP; 2nd install on same system, 1.3g and 600 more files in \System, *plus* two extra pagefiles on other partitions. Both setups worked normally, but WTF??!

      I'm not really a networking type, but I do know that being the admin is cheating [g]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  42. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by mackstann · · Score: 1

    I've heard lots of people mention this, but it seems some keyboards don't survive. Washer beware.

  43. Re:Heres an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One word sums up CowboiKneel's hygienic challenge: dingleberries

  44. Every spring I by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    Reinstall my Microsoft based OS. Does that count?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  45. Tech Support by EtherBoo · · Score: 1, Funny
    From the article:
    For a total rebuild, you make sure again you're fully backed up and know the tech-support numbers and Internet dial-up numbers you might need in a worst-case incident. Then you turn your computer off, put the operating system CD into the drive and turn the computer back on. Following the on-screen instructions, you wipe the hard drive clean and let the operating system reinstall itself from scratch. Choose not to automatically install all the "applications" software if you are given a choice, because you don't want extra programs that you won't ever use. Be picky.

    Having worked for Gateway tech support in the past, if someone called telling us that they cant find their Norton, or don't know how to reinstall Word after formatting the drive because they read somewhere that it's a good idea, we were always supposed to tell them to reinstall and automatically install all the applications (why is that in quotes in the article?). Most people who do that and have trouble afterwards are just going to be reformatted anyway if calling tech support.

  46. Slashdot Relevent News by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    "How to make some room on your hard drive"? Is that what Slashdot writes about nowadays? - The editors must be on crack!

    I see comments like these and wonder, generally, what is supposedly definitively Slashdot-worthy news. I mean, there's been about 25 Matrix articles in the last month, but not one article about Alan Ralsky being strung up by his testicles (all five of them to go along with his mutant penis after taking too many blue peckerpills, the fool.) Seriously, if it wasn't Slashdot worthy, it wouldn't get any replies, except those worded, "oops, wrong topic, i'm looking for matrix sequels threads."

    As for spring cleaning of the hard drive, I'll probably plunk a few quid for a DVD burner and shuffle archival stuff (two copies of everything, y'know) off the drive. Nothing encourages cleaning more than upgrading your computer. Nothing makes it harder to clean than the stupid way Microsoft organizes your disk for you (i.e. why the fsck is my programming code default filing under My Documents?) I generally create directories at the root level and divided things accordingly. So much simpler, but a pain everytime some stupid app askes me which name I'd like to save something as under My Documents.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Slashdot Relevent News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, my Documents with a space in its name, preventing using e.g. xmms -e `find /win/My\ Documents/Music -name *.ogg` (Yes I still have a windows partition, and stupidly enough put all my music files in the "My Documents" folder. Why haven't I changed that yet ?).

    2. Re:Slashdot Relevent News by F452 · · Score: 1

      So much simpler, but a pain everytime some stupid app askes me which name I'd like to save something as under My Documents.

      I agree that it's annoying how Microsoft wants to organize things. You can use TweakUI to set a different folder to use for "My Documents." Often you can use the "start in" field in the shortcut that starts an application to get it started in the right place. This works great with Visual Basic so that it actually goes to where I store my vb code when I open or save.

  47. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by bustacap · · Score: 1

    If you do not make any changes to your computer, then there is no need to do a complete reinstall of your OS. However for some people, reinstalling from scratch is the only and sure fire way to get stability and performance back from the machine.
    This is the case with OS X as well. The speed increase after reinstalling OS X on my iBook 700 was absolutely amazing.
    Oh and one more thing - if you plan to wipe out your HD and reinstall, might as well partition your harddrive so that you can put user files (docs, pics, etc) on a separate drive, making future reinstalls less painfull and easier to backup.

  48. I Worry About Cleaning My Disk by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

    I mean, supposing Neo is on there somewhere!

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  49. Wait until september? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I need to wait until september, or I can do this clean now, in autumn season?

  50. And vacuum out the power supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    Your power supply is probably filled with dust which must be removed.
    1. Unplug the power supply from the mains.
    2. Open the cover to the computer case.
    3. Unscrew the 3 or 4 screws which mount the power supply to the case.
    4. Remove the screws securing the power supply lid
    5. Open power supply lid.
    6. Vacuum out the dust (don't forget the fan blades).
    7. Blow out the remaining dust with compressed air.
    8. Reverse steps 1 through 5.
    Safety note: do not touch anything inside the power supply because the capacitors
    on the input side can hold a considerable charge at a couple hundred volts.

    By the way, there is usually no need to disconnect the wires running to the motherboard and disk drives. The point of unmounting the supply from the case is so to make access easier. You can leave the wires connected. In fact if you can remove the power supply lid and access the supply without umounting it, all the better.

    1. Re:And vacuum out the power supply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's good advice--it's safe to vacuum the fan if you keep the blades from spinning. I usually clean the fan blades with some alcohol and a cleaning swab. For some reason, dust really sticks to the blades; I suppose it is electrostatic charge which causes the dust to bind so tenaciously.

  51. New York Times by czion3 · · Score: 1

    Circuts in the New York Times is allright. Most of everyting they talk about I have allready heard about but once in a while they will have an intresting webpage that I will like.

    1. Re:New York Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you've heard about it because they copied it from elsewhere. It is the NY Times, remember?

    2. Re:New York Times by zo219 · · Score: 1

      Spelling, people! Spelling spelling spelling! What is this, some kinda Unix thing? Linnux? B&D?

  52. husband says to wife by glitch23 · · Score: 1

    I'm not deleting the porn and you can't make me.

    --
    this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  53. Springtime for Hitler by poptones · · Score: 1
    This article has no basis in logic - unless this person is still using windows98 or something, in which case publishing his article (let alone linking it from /.) has no logical merit.

    Even Gateway teaches its phone techs "FFR" is the last resort. Thius guy seems to think it's nothing more than a walk down the street. Don't use compression because "it's not worth the trouble?" So apparently it's just dandy to risk losing all your data because you're too lazy to make proper backups and because you're an idiot who FFR's a machine because a newspaper reporter told you to, but it's "too much trouble" to click a damn button in a dialog window? Yeah, that makes sense. Stick it on a CD instead? Uh huh - I want to dig out a CD every time I need to access the docs on the windows or java sdk. And your data will be ever so much safer stored on a CDR that gets shuffled around by your greasy mitts every day than it would be tucked away on that once-state-of-the-art hard drive.

    If you're running out of space because your drive is full of shit you don't need regular "spring cleanings" - you need to learn proper data management. Install pgpdisk and learn to use 699MB "partitions:" you can make all the backups you want whenever you need, nothing will unexpectedly outgrow its allocated space, and those "projects" will be safe from prying eyes when your imaginary girlfriend drops by to use your PC.

    If your computer is slow and you can't fix it with the more logical approach of defragging the damn thing then you may need an FFR - or you may just need to learn to stop surfing thumbnail galleries for porn and opening every moronic little gadget and "postcard" your AOL/MSN loser friends deliver to your inbox when your security settings are still at "allow any scriptkid to fuck up my PC at will."

    The article is way beneath Slashdot. I feel like I just opened an issue of Broadcasting and found this month's cover article is a reprint of a "Hirsch-Houck Labs Report" from Stereo Review.

    The guy is an idiot, and the article is full of bad advice.

    Is this what they mean by "Journalist File system?"

  54. Request for Microsoft innovation by vadim_t · · Score: 1

    Please "innovate" and "invent" the package manager! An incredible amount of trouble would be saved by it.

    Yeah, I know that the "Windows installer" with the .msi files exists, and "works", but it's still very far from dpkg or rpm. Just the attempts of Office at configuring itself every time you start it from a new account show it.

  55. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by skillet-thief · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have a box running Win95. I haven't done a reinstall for at least 4 years and it still "feels" fast. This might be due to having Norton system monintoring software that is constantly cleaning up the register.

    My wife's laptop running Win98 (and no Norton) could really use a reinstall, on the other hand. So go figure.

    --

    Congratulations! Now we are the Evil Empire

  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Oops, forgot to include the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...link.

  59. FAT or NTFS, 10MB ain't enough by poptones · · Score: 1
    That just ain't so. By the time even a 4GB drive is down to a couple hundred MB it's starting to slow noticeably. If you're doing anything at all that swaps data to the drive even less than a half gig will noticeably slow a windows system. My 30GB MP3 drive usually has about 500MB free and adding even a CD worth of MP3s may result in a files made up of hundreds (yeah, literally) of fragments.

    Try doing full rez video captures to a fresh 20GB drive filled to 80% capacity; you'll be lucky to even grab a minute or two before dropping frames.

    1. Re:FAT or NTFS, 10MB ain't enough by lkaos · · Score: 1

      Try doing full rez video captures to a fresh 20GB drive filled to 80% capacity; you'll be lucky to even grab a minute or two before dropping frames.

      This is not what a normal is doing though when they claim their system is slow though. Having 20% disk space on a 20GB drive (i.e. 4GB) is _far_ more than enough for 99.9999% of desktop users out there.

      The fact of the matter is, the reason most users think their computer is getting slower is because of the tons of crap they've installed on it (most of which decides to start up whenever a logs in).

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
  60. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  61. I Agree by repetty · · Score: 1

    "I always worry that I'll want the file again soon, and backing it up to CD is too much bother right now."

    I agree. Compact Discs: the modern floppy.

    Backup across a network.

    --Richard

  62. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by gidds · · Score: 1
    wash your keyboard under water

    If your water is soft (or you're using distilled or deionised water) then maybe. But I've seen the thin layer of minerals that hard tap water can leave on electronics. I wouldn't try it myself...

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  63. Try this... by ewhenn · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a ghost image of my OS with all of the applications I like setup installed and my system configured the way I like it (made after a clean install and all apps reinstalled). I have two partitions, one for data, games, etc., and th other for my OS. Ghost file is stored on the data drive. When things get cluttered, I simply restore the ghost image. I get my system back to "like new" state, the way I like it, and the whole process takes at most 7 mins.

  64. ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay poeple what about hidden IE5 content files?

    On a typical win2kpro install they can take up 8 gigs of a 26 gig hd over 2 years of use..

    to delete tranverse your douemnt and settings folder to your users folder..

    look for local settings folder and enter it..

    the temporay internet files folder then needs opened..

    warning Content.IE5 folder is hidden in here..add the folder to your path url and hit enter

    do not delete foledrs you see..

    enter in each folder and do selct all and move to recycle bin

    repeat until all those pesky folders in Content.IE5 are empty..

    open recycle bin and do select all

    right click on itmes and selct delte..

    choose ok on confirm screen..

    Now your done finally!

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
    1. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1

      That wont do it I had 4 gigs of stuff and it seems 300 megs were left, after many attempts at cleaning it properly The only way I could get rid of all the files was by mounting the windows partition under linux and removing all the files from there...

      --
      We've always been at war with Eurasia.
    2. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That wont do it I had 4 gigs of stuff and it seems 300 megs were left, after many attempts at cleaning it properly The only way I could get rid of all the files was by mounting the windows partition under linux and removing all the files from there...

      Just log in as a different user or as the administrator. If you are using a Win98 system then drop to a command prompt at boot and remove the folders. Why in the hell would you ever need to mount the volume under Linux to Remove the folders? Having trouble figuring how people could arrive at this.

      If you are using WinNT,2K,XP, just log in as a different user and rmdir /s "temporary internet files" in your profile or local settings folder.

      BTW, Reinstalling an OS every year is just about the stupid thing I have heard in years.

      The last time I did a 'clean' install was after the completion of a beta where it WAS necessary to remove the beta files for sure. And even this didn't entail wiping the hard drive, just doing a clean install of the OS.

      Apparently some people think that their computer is still running Windows 3.1. Geesh

      Basically cleaning out the startup items or removing crap software is all that anyone should have to do whether their OS is Win95,WinXP/NT or Linux.

      Even on my main testing system, I have NEVER reinstalled the OS, and I do tons of beta testing on it with some really crappy software sometimes (Corel Betas are my favorite for crap installs). But reinstall the OS, I don't think so.

      This article is more than ridiculous. Especially considering the market that it is directed at - basic users. They will lose their settings, and tons of files the have forgotten to back up.

      Silly Silly...

    3. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by monique · · Score: 1

      Just tried this ...

      I didn't see Content.IE5 in the "files" section of the explorer, but I did see it when I expanded the directory tree.

      What does this directory actually do, though?

      --
      -monique
    4. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I just kill IE content folders too. Nothing complains.

      I have a WinME box that tests all sorts of crap, most of which stays installed forever. Even that poor abused box has no reinstalls, and over two years without a crash.

      Win3.1 didn't need routine reinstalling either -- mine went 7 years (over two machines, three different HDs, and a change of partition) without a single reinstall. I have clients with Win3.1 systems that are now even older (9 to 10 years in continuous use). Now, if you run any species of Windows on a compressed disk, that's asking for it, but Desqview plus compression was even worse.

      In my observation, most reinstalls are the result of user-panic response when Windows won't start, and in fact are not due to serious system faults but rather some setting that got out of joint or some single file that went walkabout. A little twiddling and all is well again.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by deathcow · · Score: 1

      For me, one of the first steps of a Windows install is to turn the IE cache down to about 40 megs. The default setting is insane, who needs it? I never notice any problems or slow behavior with a 40 megabyte cache.

    6. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

      In my observation, most reinstalls are the result of user-panic response

      Exactly, and the reinstall/format plan is the only way novice techs can get a system fixed or back to the original level of performance.

      A skilled tech can find the problems, even piece by piece on older OSes and remove the problems without having to reinstall anything.

      In the mid 90s my company's tech center dealt directly with independent consumer level support and repairs that repaired and support several thousands of systems. - Formatting/reinstalling was what the hardware vendors would recommend to users or tell them the standard line, "you probably have a virus."

      In all that time it was a policy that our techs NEVER reinstalled or reformatted anyone's system, and they always were able to find the problem and fix the system without having to format or reinstall.

      They were well trained and it was our policy to not ever do the format or reinstall, but to actually just find the problems and fix them. If a tech ever violated this policy, I would have fired them.

      I'm glad to see that there are other users that do know how to maintain their systems (even at the techie level).

      I still stick with my original argument, telling users to reinstall their OS every year is just asking for trouble. If there is a problem or performance issues, that they cannot find or fix, they should opt to take the system to a tech center that knows that they are doing and just fix the conflict and the problem. Period.

      And with newer OSes like WindowsXP, this is also becoming an irrelevant concept due to its nature of self preservation mechanisms. Anymore the easiest repair for a 'truly' garbled system is just to upgrade them to XP, it is a quick fix that is making the Windows tech business all but obsolete.

      Take Care,
      The Net Avenger

    7. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by superyooser · · Score: 1

      Try this little freeware program. It has some nifty tools, including a Temp file tool, which is basically a GUI frontend for making a batch file to delete particular files. It's very customizable. I use it get rid of temp files in both profile temp folders and IE temp files. Just one click and you get to watch a console show you all the cruft being whizzed away.

    8. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I also consider a reformat or reinstall a last resort, to be done only if the disk structure is wonked beyond recovery. It is my JOB to *preserve* the client's setup and data. What the article suggests doing is the equivalent of never changing your oil, then when your car quits working, rebuild the engine. Isn't it easier just to change the oil regularly in the first place??!

      And frankly, Windows isn't all that fragile in any era. Most systems can survive 2 to 3 years of everyday neglect and abuse and still be recovered to good working order, with only ordinary effort. Sometimes a user-created mess becomes a puzzle to work out how to fix, but that's part of the job.

      I don't find XP is all that great at self-preservation -- if nothing else, the many flipped-flag bugs (where you set it one way and it does the opposite) will come to the repair tech industry's rescue :) Also, XP is *designed* for new-system and "recover only" installs, such as OEMs typically do when a user has a problem. If you reinstall it atop an existing setup, it will nuke everything that was previously installed except the My Documents hierarchy (not necessarily preserved as it was, either, but at least archived).

      BTW, any idea about this oddity? Box was running WinME; WinXP was added as a dual boot (on C: and F: respectively). Other than setting up the dual boot, XP ignored ME entirely. Original HD took a dump and mangled XP in the process. Replaced HD, restored WinME and what was left of XP, then resinstalled XP atop itself, which is how I learned that a resinstall does away with any previously-installed apps. And THIS time, it grabbed all the DOS settings from WinME's config.sys and autoexec.bat -- the items are NOT in the *.nt files (in fact, included are some settings I couldn't get to stick in *.nt), but are definitely being used in the console window!! WTF??!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    9. Re:ahem what about hidden IE5 files? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 98 SE, it's simpler to restart in DOS and run a batch file (pain to write the paths) to [deltree]
      the IE files. Maybe include extra [dir] commands to be sure you've cleaned out everything.
      Btw, don't try redefining paths for IE to use (I tried, with Xteq); 5.5, at least, won't do what you ask, only part of it, and might decide not to keep history, at all.

  65. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by rugger · · Score: 1

    no, this is not a good way to clean keyboards ... at least not properly.

    To properly clean a modernish keyboard, you:

    1) unscrew the screws on the bottom and remove the insides from the case. You can clean the case.
    2) remove all the keys from the keyboard, and clean them.
    3) remove and clean the silicone key mat. (this has the springy buttons on it.
    4) remove the circutry and the clear plastic keyboard terminal layouts, but do not clean them unless you need to. If you clean them, dry them immediately with a hair drier to avoid corrosion.
    5) clean anything that is left over and not electrical.
    6) reassemble. Use silicon oil around the keys if desired.

    It is time consuming, and may not be worth it for many, but it really cleans the keyboard well.

  66. Cleanin? We don need no steenkin cleanin' by methangel · · Score: 1

    I seriously have upgraded to a new hard drive each time I ran low on space. I have 280 gigs now. I have so much shi--stuff! Alas, I am too lazy to burn CDs so I am in a never-ending cycle of data collection.

    Laziness is the bane of all that is good and pure!

    To infinity and beyoonnnnnnnd!

  67. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by eMartin · · Score: 1

    Many recent keyboards can actually be taken apart pretty easily, and allow you to completely separate the electronics from the dirty bits.

    I have an MS Natural Keyboard, and the top face comes off nicely with the keycaps attached (all just plastic). I just throw it into the bathtub with some soap, and then let it dry by a window. Then if necessary, even the insides (clear plastic sheets with circuits printed on them and some rubber "springs") and bottom cover (if the tiny PCB is unscrewed and removed) can be cleaned without too much trouble.

  68. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by eidechse · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think that anyone that uses windows as a general-purpose PC...over a long period of time will eventually need to do a fresh install to get rid of everything.

    Or you could just learn how to properly maintain the system.

    The windows registry is one cause of this.. it's a huge unmanagable beast, with many ways to have things load and hook in to various operations

    It is hardly unmanageable. There's about 4 or 5 keys that have values to load processes on machine/session startup, and the "hook" mechanism (shell operations defined in HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT) isn't exactly rocket science. Are these operations that less skilled users will feel comfortable performing? Probably not, but they don't get warm and fuzzies reinstalling the OS and drivers either. As for more advanced users, these skills are not only easily acquired but necessary. Or I suppose one could just not bother learning about their tools and nuke and pave on a regular basis.

  69. This article is lame.. by INeedWeed · · Score: 0

    wtf happened to slashdot?

    I AM BORED!

  70. hang on now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hardly consider myself an ubergeek. what's the point of running a windows 101 article here?

    yeah, it's sunday and /. relaxes and that's fine [maybe someone would care to submit a mouse terrarium; get a mold farm running in your clear mouse] but geez timothy, what's the hook for /. here? did you mean to add: "What mad skilz techniques do /.'ers have to getting clean and staying clean?"

    sorry man, but this is like a cnet hint. i'm missing your point.

  71. How I clean it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just take the old 'puter down to the local carwash and blast it inside and out.

  72. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by TC+(WC) · · Score: 1

    I'm really not sure why people always say this... Up until a month and a half ago I was running my main computer on a Windows 9x install that hadn't been reformatted or reinstalled from scratch since sometime in 1997... It lasted through an upgrade from Windows 95 to 98SE and a switch in the computer the drive was in before finally dying just recently from a hard drive failure. It just takes a little bit of registry trimming every once and a while and it'll be happy.

  73. Feh... by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1

    When it comes to Windows, I do a clean re-install once a year, whether it needs it or not.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Feh... by polygl0t · · Score: 1

      I has me a bath once a week, whether I need it or not!

  74. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    If you going to partly take the keyboard apart, you might aswell go the whole way, and remove the electronics and membrane sheet. Most keyboards don't completely fall apart (IE, all the keys probably won't fall off). Then you can even use soap.

  75. Hmm, this is strange. by foolip · · Score: 1
    When there's too much on your hard drive ... your computer will run slower, your computer will crash more often ...

    Wow, I wonder what sort of system this guy could be running. Crash more often -- am I the only one who expects my software to not crash, no matter what (although admittedly it has on two occasions the last year :P ) ?

    Oh. Windows XP it says in the next paragraph...

  76. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by IanBevan · · Score: 1

    Actually on XP, and probably Windows 2000, I believe outlook express puts its data in the "my documents" directory.

  77. Carwash? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only a carwash had as much effect on car performance.

    Carwash? If you put your computer through a shower, I bet that you'll have a lot worse performance than before you started. What you really should be comparing is a tuneup.

    And if you're suggesting a reinstall of the OS, then you'll be comparing with a garage guy who's trying to rip you off with a sudden oil change, * fluid change, new set of tires, and, oh what the heck, a brand new engine.

    1. Re:Carwash? by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this fellow was at one time a crooked garage guy who suddendly graduated to writing lame brained articles for a newspaper.

      What's scary though is you will see countless n00bies advocating this article like it was the Holy Grail or something...

      --
      You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  78. n00b article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why is this on slashdot? the article is for clueless newbie users.

    1. Re:n00b article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question. We dont need no n00b articles here, and this one certainly qualifies in that regard.

  79. Similar experience by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    I had a pc purchased in 1999 running with its original Win98SE install up until two months ago. It was working fine and the only reason I wiped it was because I gave it to someone and they wanted another OS on it. Whenever someone tells me that they do a fresh install every year or whatever I keep quiet to avoid getting into another boring lecture on why this is necessary.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

  80. You've got to be kidding by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    Isn't your time worth something? Just buy a new keyboard.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

    1. Re:You've got to be kidding by NotoriousQ · · Score: 1

      You have to be kidding, right.

      I have 2 keyboards. One is a fairly old IBM keyboard, that has the nicest feel to it you will ever see. They do not make keyboards like that anymore.

      The other one is a Microsoft natural pro. Yes it is replacable, but I do not wish to spend $30+ to do so.

      All it takes is a half an hour to pop keys drop them in a solution of detergent and water, and use alcohol dipped qtips on the actual surface.

      And you only need to do it once per year.

      --
      badness 10000
    2. Re:You've got to be kidding by deragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you kidding? You have to leave your home, pay a new keyboard ($75+taxes for the Logitech which is equivalent of more than two hours of work), wait in line at the cashier, come back home and open the box. Also, you spend money for the gas, which again you had to work for, thus consuming more time.

      Or, spend 15 minutes washing your keyboard in the confort of your home, listening to music. Also, my way of doing it is much more environmentaly friendly.

      --
      Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
    3. Re:You've got to be kidding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      $75+taxes for the Logitech which is equivalent of more than two hours of work


      If you spent less time washing your keyboard and more working on your l337 skills, maybe you'd earn more.

    4. Re:You've got to be kidding by r3jjs · · Score: 1

      Of course my time is worth something, but its not enough to just go out and buy a new keyboard.

      Not to mention that my preferred keyboard is no longer made..

      (A NUFORM keyboard by Adesso. A Natural shaped keyboard with a mouse pointer in the middle. I can't find anything else to replace it with.)

    5. Re:You've got to be kidding by anubi · · Score: 1
      Weeel, I'll give him the benefit that the $75 + tax + gasoline is the money he has to spend after he deducts all the taxes and expenses he had to spend to get the spendable cash in the first place. It seems I have to "earn" about $500 to get around $75 that I can spend in a store. The rest gets siphoned off to an enormous assortment of taxes and overhead expenses.

      I found I worked much cheaper than a gardener if I worked for myself, as I had a choice as to try to earn $500 to get $75 spendable cash for the gardener, or just do it myself. Ok, a couple of hours.. $250 hour equivalent to mow the lawn. But I am not taxed on the money I did not have to spend if I mowed the lawn myself, I am only taxed on the money I earn doing something for someone else.

      The trick is in working for businesses, they need a write off too, so there is high incentive for them to report all transactions to get credit for their expenses, placing the tax burden onto me, yet the gardener, taking advantage that tax law gives me no incentive for deductions for employing a gardener, gets 100% pure spendable unaccounted for cash, not some block of numbers in a box on a chit of paper that look impressive, but when the spendable cash is extracted, not much. And much accounting to the government even over that. You may end up below the so called poverty line, and still pay more tax than Microsoft Corporation is rumored to pay.

      As for solvents, watch it. Some melt plastic. Others will also remove the lubricants which made the plastic parts slide smoothly. My favorite technique is to use a solution of distilled water and dishwashing detergent and apply the solution with a paintbrush to the keyboard, scrubbing with the brush, so as to remove the surface contaminants while using a shop-vac type vacuum cleaner to remove any excess solution so it doesn't get in and gum the works. If the keyboard is already that gummed up, I'll take it apart and clean it in the sink, as many keyboards are made so that this is actually possible. Some are made with an assortment of springs in such a manner that once you discover how it was assembled, you will never get it back together again. It is obvious they used some sort of jig to get it together in the first place. But then, a lot of capacitive keyboards use some sort of molded elastomeric spring sheet, and are quite easy to clean. But the problem with these is that they are rubberlike, and like darned all rubberlike materials I have encountered, sans some in the space program, they lose elasticity with age. Cleaning them won't restore their former properties. Might as well get a new keyboard if thats the case.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    6. Re:You've got to be kidding by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? You have to leave your home, pay a new keyboard ($75+taxes for the Logitech which is equivalent of more than two hours of work)

      Man, some people are so insular it's scary.

      You know, most of the world actually leaves home from time to time. Work, school, social activities, grocery shopping, you name it. Popping into Best Buy for 5 minutes when it's 10 feet from the Safeway isn't exactly a time killer.

      As for $75 being more than 2 hours of work.. I'd say it's more than 10 hours of work, after taxes, for most people on /.

      And if nothing else, if you think driving to a store once a year or 2 to buy a new keyboard is really that much of a damper on your wanting-to-live-indoors-24-7 lifestyle... maybe the keyboard is trying to tell you something :)

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  81. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by AhPookTheDestroyer · · Score: 1

    I do regular maintenance on my Windows XP machine, spyware removal (Which is minimal - anyone that is still accumulating spyware in this day and age is either clueless or lazy. There are plenty of preventative measures available for this problem, Mozilla and common sense for starters), limiting background programs, disk defragging, archiving, etc...I definitely like to keep things organized.

    Even with this maintenance, after 75 or so application installs (this is on a 80GB drive, not even filling half of it), things tend to get sluggish. Why this happens is for many reasons, but it's clear, even with good maintenance habits, the OS will eventually slow to a crawl. As far I can remember (at least since 3.1) Windows has always been like this. Performance wise, there's a huge difference between a fresh system maintenance session and a fresh reinstall.

    Eventually I got tired of reinstalling Windows every 6 months, so here's what I've been doing for past five years or so:

    1) I found a good disk imaging software package (I like Power Quest's Drive Image) and perform a fresh install.

    2) Apply all critical updates and service packs. Configure the (minimum) system services, system policies and so forth. Install any games, browsers or frequently used programs (I usually don't include this stuff. Updates happen so often, I usually end up upgrading or reinstalling the app anyway). Tweak it all out, do a disk defrag, clean up and defrag registry, then image it.

    3) For speed and convenience, I use a second hard drive for imaging (note: A CDRW or second hard drive is needed for imaging. You can't write the image to your boot drive). With a CDRW, you might have to span disks if you want to include a lot of data on you image. With a DVDR/RW, you probably won't have to worry about spanning, but the imaging software must support DVD writing.

    Using this method I can do a complete Windows reinstall and have all my main apps ready to go in about ten minutes. I use a second hard drive (80GB) for the image as well as for storing apps and backup data. Any critical data (as well as the OS image itself) is written to CDRW. I also installed a third hard drive on a separate IDE controller from the boot drive, and put the pagefile there. If you have a spare drive lying around, and you don't have a gig of ram installed, this is a nice speed tweak.

    Yes, RAID could accomplish much of what I'm doing here, but still I prefer this method.

    PS

    Don't forget to visit MS and grab all the critical updates after you restore an image. If your image is more than a month or two old, there'll be a boatload of 'em.

  82. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by Aardpig · · Score: 1

    I find the following technique works well for me:

    1. Invert keyboard
    2. Bang underside of keyboard very hard for 5 seconds over desk
    3. Sweep up little pile of paper clips, food droppings and cigarette ash which has collected on desk
    4. If keyboard still malfunctions, buy new one, and repeat the following mantra 5 times: 'When playing Team Fortress Classic on-line, neither smoking or drinking make me faster or cooler'.
    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  83. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by spike+hay · · Score: 1

    Do not forget, water + electronics is not the problem, its water + electricity (off course, leaving your electronics for months under water, well, it might rust... Don't over do it. :) ) So go on, and clean your keyboards under the sink.

    As another poster said, watch out for hard water. My favorite way is to wash it with ethanol. Excellent solvent. And it dries quickly with no residue.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  84. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by AhPookTheDestroyer · · Score: 1

    "A CDRW or second hard drive is needed for imaging." Mistakenly omitted - usually a second partition on the boot drive can be used as well.

  85. Ah, the good ol' days by noda132 · · Score: 1

    I remember the good ol' days of reinstalls every 6 months to keep my computer running...

    Now I use Linux, and since I don't have the privs to install stuff to / (except when I su), I can't put junk in /, and so no cruft builds up in /. As a worst-case scenario (which I haven't had any motivation to resort to), I can just rename my home directory and make a new one with permissions 700 belonging to me, and presto! All cruft gone. Bring in files (i.e., .gaimrc, gconf data) as needed.

    Speaking of which, here's where the real advantages of gconf over the Windows registry come in....

    The author is completely wrong about the Red Hat Linux folks, his steps are not at all necessary.

  86. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by sean23007 · · Score: 1

    You go 24 hours without your keyboards? Yeah. A lot of Slashdot will be following your advice...

    --

    Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  87. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by parkanoid · · Score: 1

    I use an IBM series M, and dipping it in paint thinnner every three years is all the cleaning it needs ;)

  88. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by deragon · · Score: 1

    Well duh, I use my spare keyboard off course. You do have a spare keyboard, don't you?

    BTW, its not though going 24 hours without a keyboard. Lets say 21 hours is enough to dry. You clean your keyboard at 21h00 monday evening, after finishing off any work on your computer. Then, you clean the dishes, watch tv and go to bed. Next morning you go to work. It will be 18h00 when you come back home. Assemble your keyboard and voilà. You didn't miss it much.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  89. Re:Every�day�is�springtime by sydb · · Score: 1

    You've¦never¦eaten¦properly¦cooked¦food,¦by¦the¦so unds¦of¦it.

    Contrast¦the¦subtle¦textural¦nuances¦of¦the¦micr ow ave¦and¦the¦oven.¦I'm¦a¦vegeterian,¦but¦I'm¦thinki ng¦of¦a¦lovely¦piece¦of¦brisket,¦crispy¦at¦the¦edg es¦where¦the¦oven¦has¦gently¦seared¦the¦surface¦of ¦the¦cut¦of¦meat¦without¦turning¦it¦to¦carbon.

    You¦can't¦do¦that¦with¦a¦microwave,¦everything¦t ur ns¦into¦a¦bland,¦limp,¦wet¦pizza-like¦substance¦wi th¦flavouring.

    Nor¦can¦you¦stir-fry¦in¦either¦a¦microwave¦or¦a¦ to aster¦oven.¦Stir-fries¦should¦be¦cooked¦quickly¦-¦ briefly¦seared¦to¦heat¦and¦trap¦in¦the¦moisture.

    --
    Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  90. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although XP is definitely more stable than Win9x, when it crashes, it *crashes*. My experience so far is that Win98 usually crashes fatally within 6 months (on top of the near daily crashes of course) and that XP generally runs alright (with the rare exceptions of rogue applications eating up huge amounts of memory and requiring a reboot or Windows doing that itself) for about a year, at which point you will most likely experience an irreversible BSOD of some kind. Up until now, I have never been able to recover an NT machine from a BSOD on startup and that's generally the point where I get out my boot disk, emergency backup hard drive and XP CD for my own little "spring cleaning". I know how to use the command line tools and the like, but none of it works. The fact is that NT degrades over time. They can build in all the "stability" they want, but in the end, it is still a huge vacuum cleaner sucking in all sorts of weird shit and slowly deteriorating over time, predistined to crash at some point in the future.

    This is why I love Mac OS X. :-)

  91. thanks for this absolutely newsworthy information by n3k5 · · Score: 1
    Spring cleaning for your hard drive.
    I didn't even know my hard drive has springs that need to be cleaned regularly!
    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  92. Zero all data on Macs... by berniecase · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Every now and then I'll back up my home directory, and any apps I really need, and then boot off of a CD or another hard drive so that I can run disk utility and zero all data on my boot drive. Afterwards, I either restore my backed up OS (I used to do this mostly on OS9; haven't tried it on OS X), or just reinstall the OS from scratch (I just did this last night with an iMac I'm selling).

    The nice thing about zeroing all data, is that it's the poor man's defrag on a Mac - your data will be written close together when you reinstall it. It's especially good if you use your boot drive for A/V work - you'll end up with large chunks of contiguous space for huge files, instead of those huge files being fragmented.

  93. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by adamfranco · · Score: 1

    A full reinstall risks loss of data. One example is your email.

    This is one of my favorite parts about *nix. Just back up your home directory and you can have all of you user data/settings in place and ready to use.

    Hell, it even works when changing operating systems. Last summer I went from Debian to Red Hat, and just pointed the new OS to my home directory (on another drive). All of my KDE settings, wallpapers, mozilla & evolution mail and settins were all right there in the clean OS install. Nothing to "customize" except for system settings/software.

    --
    "When ideology and theology couple, their offspring are not always bad but they are always blind." -- Bill Moyers
  94. This is the stupiest thing I have heard in years.. by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 1

    The last time I heard this advice was from a Jr. Tech at one of my companies, and it took only five minutes to show him why this was never necessary. (And I am talking about Win 3.0/Win 3.1 days even.)

    With modern OSes, simply cleaning out startup items and removing crap software is basically all that ever needs to be done.

    Even if someone thinks they need to do a 'refresh' of their OS, just doing an upgrade over their existing installation (Win2k and WinXP are especially good at this) will clean out 99.9% of any crap that has been added to the system. And this doesn't lose any settings or files.

    It would have been smarter if the article would have told users where to find the startup items, how to do an upgrade over their current OS, how to remove crap software, or even a techie article that explains where to look for extraneous services and remove/disable them. Even giving them tools to clean their system would be a better article than this. And I am not an advocate for most system 'cleaning tools'.

    Who gets these journalistic jobs and why are editors stupid enough to print them?

    TheNetAvenger

  95. I guess you don't really understand, huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    File space on a hard drive is allocated on a per-cluster basis. If you have a 4K file on a hard drive with 4 K sized clusters, it will be fill up one single cluster. The OS will not - WILL NOT - split a 4 K file into 5 different pieces unless YOU physically split the file into 5 files.

    Fragmentation is caused when a large file is split up and is stored non-contiguously on the hard drive.

    Thus, maybe if you had a 20K file, and it was split into 5 clusters, and these 5 clusters were physically stored all over the hard drive, then you would get fragmentation.

    But the situation that you described above simply does not occur.

    Also, what does journaling have anything to do with fragmentation?

    You are an idiot.

  96. Re:Every�day�is�springtime by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    Microwave crisping bags actually DO work. You can brown meat and toast bread with them just fine.

    Steam rice and vegitables in pyrex or ceramic containers (nothing with a tight seal obviously).

    Scrambled eggs cook completely and evenly, with no grease or fat, and come out amazingly fluffy. (cook one at a time, 1min 20sec each. I like to whip in a tablespoon of whole milk with mine)

    Even bacon cooks OK if you can hang it, though admittedly it's not as good as a traditional frying pan. Extra fat drains off very well though.

    Granted, you can't stir fry... or at least I've yet to figure out how... there must be a way! You can't bake stuff properly either. A toaster oven can handle most baking requirements for your average bachelor though.

    BTW what's with all the pipes? Are you a plumber by day? ;)
    =Smidge=

  97. No, this is poor advice as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard drives are not meant to be spun up occasionally, copied onto, and then stored for long periods of time. The physical motor will fail, and then you're up shit's creek.

    Hard drives are not meant to be used for long term storage, this is the domain of tapes, ie. DLT tapes. They have a life of around 3 years, especially the "disposable"-type drives that the hard drive companies have been manufacturing over the past 5 years. They are deliberately building hard drives that are supposed to fail in a few years.

    If you're going to be doing backups, you should backup onto a hard drive that is always on, so that you can monitor the health of your backup drive. If the backup drive starts going bad before your actual drive, then you can replace the drive with no-harm-no-foul.

    The last thing you want is to suffer a hard drive crash, and then go to your backup hard drive in storage, and find out that it doesn't spin up.

    1. Re:No, this is poor advice as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Hard drives are not meant to be used for long term storage,"

      Who said anything about "long term storage"? In order for a backup to be useful, you have to do it regularly. Obviously, that drive won't be sitting in your closet unused for a long time, and you will know when it fails.

      "If you're going to be doing backups, you should backup onto a hard drive that is always on, so that you can monitor the health of your backup drive."

      There is no difference in that regard to tapes: tapes also deteriorate "on the shelf" and you can't rely on them working after storage. The solution is the same in both cases: rotate your media.

      "long term storage, this is the domain of tapes, ie. DLT tapes."

      Magnetic tapes are intrinsically flawed for long-term storage, in particular high-density tapes.

    2. Re:No, this is poor advice as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The shelf life for magnetic tapes are in the decades. This is their sole purpose in life. Hard drives are much, much more fragiles than a tape backup system.

      I guess you've never really used tape drives in a production environment, otherwise you would know this.

  98. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh? Water + electronics/metal + air = rust == bad conductivity.

    It's best to use rubbing alcohol since it won't cause rusting.

    Also, you do realize you can pop off the keys instead of taking apart your entire keyboard.

    It's way easier, lets you get inbetween where all the food, hair and nastiess get into, and allows you to clean off your sticky keys from too much one-handed pr0n gazing.

  99. Simple by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Learn to use Linux. Try a book.

    To reinstall lilo/grub when you've reinstalled windows you simply need a boot disk (you made one right?), mount your linux partition, and reinstall lilo/grub (I think it's in /usr/sbin, I haven't had to do this in a while and don't feel like looking it up).

    Then you're good to go. Very simple. If you don't have a boot disk you could download 2 Disk X Windows distribution and run it from there. It's easy to find.

    1. Re:Simple by Mac+Degger · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah...read a book, spend a lot of time, and hope linux does what it should do...or spend some money and have a system which is consistent, crashes as rarely as linux and is userfriendly and GUI'd all across the board.

      I guess it just goes to show you get what you pay for.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Simple by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I made a boot disk, I lost the boot disk. Running the Mandrake reinstaller didn't help. I didn't find any useful links with Google. Oh, and I have a book. I tried Red Hat before Mandrake (but couldn't get my soundcard--onboard unfortunately--to work which was unacceptable so I tried Mandrake which did work), and got the Red Hat Linux 7.3 Bible. Not the best book out there, but it helped for most things.

  100. Forget ethanol, try methane by VampireByte · · Score: 1

    (With accent of french soldiers in Monty Python's Holy Grail) I fart on your keyboard.

    --

    Run and catch, run and catch, the lamb is caught in the blackberry patch.

  101. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People clean keyboards? What, do you munch on greasy chips right over it or something?

    fwiw, I'd just pop off the keys and clean under 'em that way.

    btw, "of course" one f.

  102. This has to be the most STUPIDEST thing ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off I don't take advice from some newspaper flunky. Second it never ceases to amaze me just how freaking stupid a lot of people are when it comes to computers.

    They get spyware because they don't read freaking license agreements or EULA's, or get it because they are too dumb to tighten up browser security so your browser (often Internet Explorer) WONT auto download and install it for you like a good little bitch. If people would actually use software like Proxomitron and JD5000 (Add-in for Proxomitron), then you would not have problems with drive by spyware or other HTML/Java/Javascript/Exploits/Nasties while browsing the web. It's called UNIVERSEL WEB FILTER for a reason!!!.

    Not to mention of course the biggest things like ACTUALLY VIRUS SCANNING everything that comes into your computer and doing system maintenance by de-fragmenting your hard drive or even getting something like Norton Utils 2002 or later to keep the system, registry, and hard drive(s) maintained properly.

    Just this week I talked to two people I see online often in IRC. One was stupid enough to have 330 ITEMS OF SPYWARE detected in Ad-Aware and another is too dumb to actually tighten up his mIRC settings to avoid automatically downloading IRC viruses/worms.

    I'm sorry but I have no sympathy for morons who can't keep virus scanners updated and virus scan everything that comes into the computer, cant keep up to date with software like AD-Aware 6 and Spybot: Search and Destroy, or actually uses Internet Explorer or other browsers with default settings on a windows box and wonders why the hell crap like Xupiter and viruses get through the holes in their browser(s).

    And if you follow the "steps" laid out by that lame assed newspaper article, it's a big mess of crap for nothing when if you actually have a freaking clue how everything works on your computer (both software and hardware) then you will VERY RARELY if EVER need to re-install. I laugh at thee who re-installs a OS every 3 months or every year because of their stupidity. Sell your computer if you are too dumb to do the most basic of steps. *Rolls eyes*

  103. Re:This is the stupiest thing I have heard in year by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

    Well you and me know that most journalists are dumber then your average rock anyway, including the one who wrote that article. :D

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  104. Re:thanks for this absolutely newsworthy informati by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

    Yeah you must remember to oil those springs regularly or they may get rusty and creak and groan :D

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  105. I don't know ANY linux users who need to do this. by k12linux · · Score: 1
    From the article: The precise steps of a good scrub depend on your operating system. I'll walk through what I do with Windows XP -- which will be pretty similar to what Windows ME and 98 and even Red Hat Linux folks do, too.

    Um... no.

    I know several Linux/UNIX sys admin types (self included) who use Linux on their home PC and work PC as the primary OS. To the best of my knowledge, none of us would do this. Kruft (left over programs and parts of programs) really isn't a big issue on Linux.

    Before I replaced it with a new one, my home PC had Red Hat v6.1 then v6.2, v7.1, v7.2 and finally v7.3 installed as upgrades. All of these versions were installed with the upgrade option NOT as clean installs. At all times, everything kept working and nearly all settings migrated to the new version without extra work on my part. Through all of this there was never a need for "spring cleaning" to fix things or speed them up.

    Request to author: Please at least check with some experienced Linux users before claiming to know how Linux should be maintained.

  106. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

    Wow...will you be surprised at the increase in performance when you do a clean install.

    Had you used win2k/xp, I wouldn't have said that, but as an 'expert amateur' using dos/win95/98/2k and xp, (regcleaning, spy-ware busting, occaisonal virusscanning et all) I can say with confidence that win9x sucks the big one compared to the newer kernels.

    Do yourself a favour...get win2k/xp...hell, even linux is better than a win9x OS :)

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  107. Gentoo, OCD by xtrucial · · Score: 1

    "emerge --clean world" is your friend. :-)

    Also, for what it's worth, keeping organized and clean is second nature to me, since I'm obsessive-compulsive. Hell, I even act as a "consultant" for my friends and neighbors in cleaning and organizing their rooms. If any of you out there would care for such assistance, email me! :-)

  108. I don't have to - I own a compaq by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    I have to ship my Compaq laptop in for repair about every six months for the same problem every time... they always blitz and reimage the hard drive for me, so I never have to spring clean.

    It does suck; however, to have to re-install everything twice every year...

  109. To which OS are you referring? by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    OS X, Solaris, Windows (insert version here), DOS...

    I wonder.

    Linux and *BSD are extremely stable. Try getting 2-3 years of up time out of a Windows server.

    You do get what you pay for when the person administering a machine has no experience. Either learn or don't, I don't care.

    I use Windows, OS X/9, Solaris, Linux, BSD and DOS (this OS won't die). I'll rank them for you.

    Best for stability: Linux / BSD / Solaris
    Better than average: OS X (10.2, improved a lot)
    Average: DOS / OS X (10.1) / OS 9.x
    Below Average: OS X (10.0)
    Poor: Windows

    My guess is that there is a direct correlation between the experience of the user and the stability of the system they use.

    Calling it an End User Error would probably be taken as a typical elitist computer attitude. However, I expect people to put forth effort in things they try to do. This is why most people don't succeed in our society, they won't RTFM and try to better themselves.

    Oh well, no wonder it's so easy to succeed. When your competing against people who refuse to learn to use the tool they are bitching about "not working", you cannot help but succeed. Taking up for those too lazy to learn. How sweet of you.

    1. Re:To which OS are you referring? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Linux and *BSD are extremely stable. Try getting 2-3 years of up time out of a Windows server.

      Good troll kid. I've got that already. And, FWIW, your lumping all "Windows" in the same category shows that you have no idea what you're talking about.

  110. IN SOVIET RUSSIA... by PetWolverine · · Score: 1

    HARD DRIVE cleans YOU!

    --
    I found the meaning of life the other day, but I had write-only access.
  111. It's not an overnight thing. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The thing I've seen most people forget is they tend to gloss over how long it took them to learn the first computer OS they worked with.

    Once people know how to use a computer a certain way, they don't want to relearn. I had no choice since my first computer was an Apple //e (as was my second since the first was stolen!). I then learned to use DOS, then Windows 3.1, then Windows 95, then Windows NT, then Linux (Slackware), then Solaris, you get the picture.

    The linux documentation project is the best. Plus just do google searches for your problems. Linux is more difficult to install than windows (newer versions, 95 is a nightmare). However, it becomes quickly easier to use (kind of like OS X).

    1. Re:It's not an overnight thing. by citog · · Score: 1

      While I agree with you to a certain extent, I do have a lot of sympathy for those who try to get into Linux but get overwhelmed. Linux is a lot more difficult to get up and running with. It's also more difficult to get some peripherals working under Linux, peripherals that people take for granted under Windows. Most of the time you can sit down and read the documentation but some of that is pretty overwhelming too. Personally, I have Mandrake on my firewall box, Redhat 9 on my P4 (really coming of age as a desktop OS) but do most things on my PowerBook (OS X). Getting my Palm PDA to work with RH 8 was incredibly painful. There are a lot of things that people take as a given when it comes to their OS. Not being able to do that with a new OS is frustrating and feels like a step backwards.

      Also, at the moment the Linux world, IMHO, seems to be undecided as to whether it wants switchers or wants to maintain a user base of dedicated techies

  112. Hard drive visualization tools help out a lot by LPetrazickis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Steffen Gerlach's Scanner (see also his excellent Borland Delphi-based Civilization clone) and SequoiaView were invaluable back when my hard-drive was a puny 20 giger. I highly recommend you all get them and try them out.

    P.S. Be sure to turn on the colour mode in SequoiaView.;)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
    1. Re:Hard drive visualization tools help out a lot by CvD · · Score: 1
      For unix users, this will give you somewhat the same functionality to SequoiaView. It'll show you the 50 largest directories on your filesystem:
      du -S / | sort -nr | head -n50
      Cheers,

      Costyn.
  113. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by bluehand · · Score: 1

    I Cant Understand why people that call themselves geek can give this kind of advice
    my windows machine (which now is a PIII 550) runs a copy of windows that was originaly dos 4 with windows 3.0
    and was upgraded from this to 3.1 , 3.11, windows 95 beta, 95 , 95 OSR2 , 98 ,98 SE , 2000
    always upgrade never a clean install
    and it works like a charm
    never goes down and has a decent uptime (comparable to any windows machine)
    i really dont get why people profess that it cant be done
    it shure can you just have to undestand your system and know how to maintain it
    like all geeks are suposed to know (or at least like to brag about knowing it)
    so please stop giving this kind of advice
    it has never been true if you know what you're doing

  114. DEFRAG! by Omestes · · Score: 1

    He forgot the defrag! How can anyone call there computer clean without:

    1. Spybot (and/or ad-aware)
    2. reboot
    3. Uninstall all unused crap/windows stuff
    4. reboot
    5. Check for new drivers/uninstall old drivers
    6. reboot
    7. Run windows silly "clean-disk" util
    8. manually delete windows/temp directory
    9. clear Mozilla or Firebird cache
    10. delete all old useless penis enlarger spam
    11. reboot
    12. run a DLL scanner/remover
    13. reboot
    14. run regcleaner, followed by MS's regclean
    15. reboot
    16. full scandisk (w/ surface scan)
    17. clear reboot (disable win swap, and all startups, and SCREEN SAVER!)
    18. defrag
    19. Goto taco bell, see a movie.
    20. done.

    Or the simple route, "shutdown to DOS prompt"
    "format c:", "Y"

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  115. It's not for Linux to decide. by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    It's for a distribution to decide.

    If one company could make an install and OS that was anywhere near as easy to use as OS X for x86 hardware, they would rule.

    Simply put it's not an easy thing to accomplish. Look at all the things you'd need to do. Drivers, GUI, Apps, etc...

    Maybe if the company that did this also had a select HCL that was reasonable. The best thing about OS X is the standard OS 9 user couldn't tell you where the hell the / is. Apple mounts all drives under /Volumes which makes life a hell of a lot easier. I mean grandma doesn't need to go look in /var/logs to see if someone has accessed her system.

    Plus linux isn't one thing. It's many. Think of all the different ways to do the same thing. Hell I love linux because I can ssh to my servers and do everything without rebooting and no GUI necessary (terminal services, yuck). The OS X Server tools are really nice but the nitty gritty is still in the text files.

    I guess it's a pipe dream but it's doubtful that linux will ever become the OS of switchers. If this SCO suit has one positive maybe IBM will drop AIX development and create their own solid Linux distro. That I would buy.

  116. Keep dreaming by freeweed · · Score: 1

    Man, Slashdot readers sure show their ignorance when it comes to maintaing Windows systems.

    This is at least the 20th post that I've seen which states "all you need to do is clean out your 'startup items' and remove excess software you don't use".

    Ok, so: who can list all of the places an application/service can start from within Windows? (hint: it's more than programs\startup, win.ini, and the 3 or 4 registry keys you may have heard about - and I bet most people don't even realize this much). Ok, so you've nailed all of that. Now, it's time to remove the excess applications - what's that? All uninstallers don't behave nicely? You're finding DLLs from applications you removed that are still in \system32? How can it be??? I asked Windows to uninstall it!!!!

    Yes, it's not as bad as Windows 95 these days. However, the registry just keeps getting worse. Extra and conflicing libraries are still a huge hassle on Windows-based systems. And unless you're intending on auditing, line for line, every registry entry you have (mine's a few megs of binary data, have fun), and checking every single file you have, making sure it's the appropriate version (did I mention you can't check source for most applications, so you really never know what DLL should be there?)....

    "It runs ok for me" and "as long as your system runs, it's fine" is NOT sufficient, and anyone who tries these lines should be ashamed of themselves.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Keep dreaming by TheNetAvenger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Man, Slashdot readers sure show their ignorance when it comes to maintaing Windows systems.

      This is at least the 20th post that I've seen which states "all you need to do is clean out your 'startup items' and remove excess software you don't use".

      Ok, so: who can list all of the places an application/service can start from within Windows? (hint: it's more than programs\startup, win.ini, and the 3 or 4 registry keys you may have heard about - and I bet most people don't even realize this much). Ok, so you've nailed all of that. Now, it's time to remove the excess applications - what's that? All uninstallers don't behave nicely? You're finding DLLs from applications you removed that are still in \system32? How can it be??? I asked Windows to uninstall it!!!!

      Yes, it's not as bad as Windows 95 these days. However, the registry just keeps getting worse. Extra and conflicing libraries are still a huge hassle on Windows-based systems. And unless you're intending on auditing, line for line, every registry entry you have (mine's a few megs of binary data, have fun), and checking every single file you have, making sure it's the appropriate version (did I mention you can't check source for most applications, so you really never know what DLL should be there?)....


      Um, certified Windows professional here that has been in the NT beta program since its beginning. Putting me in the 'slashdot ignorance group' is not going to work, especially when you know very little about what you are talking about. (PS your spelling sucks as well) :)

      You have very limited knowledge if you think that an 'uninstalled' DLL that still exists in the system32 folder is going to affect your system. Other than taking up the 32kb of space, it will have NO affect on ANYTHING under Windows.

      In 'modern' Windows there are three basic areas of startup locations. The Startup Folder (including the All Users Startup Folder), The HKEY_CURRENT_USER Run area, and the HKEY_Local_Machine Run area.

      However there are a few extra places that you probably don't even know about that legacy applications can place startup applications, like a win.ini file (although the win.ini files tend to be unique to the software application in Win2k and especially WindowsXP - hence the Windows folder in your user profile that maintains this).

      There is also the load and run areas of the registry under HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE WindowsNT - Current Version, etc. (This one tricks most self appointed Windows Know it Alls.)

      But for the MOST part ONLY the three main areas I mentioned above are used unless someone has written an app that is a worm and hides itself in the other Run areas. Software that has been written in the last eight years does not use these other areas anymore.

      And again, with the conflicting DLL problems and where the DLLs should or shouldn't be are NO LONGER a problem whatsoever under Windows2k, and especially WindowsXP.

      You see these 'modern Windows' OSes can put conflicting DLLs with the applications and not even let the application know that they really are not still sitting in the System or System32 folder.

      It is a part of the protection mechanism in WindowsXP. And with WindowsXP, different DLL versions are isolated and can even run concurrently supporting the application that needs whichever version of the DLL it needs. This is all maintained by the WindowsXP OS. A quite nice and impressive feature of the OS that ensures stability and keeps crappy programmers from compromising other applications.

      Geesh...

      If you were a 'real' expert when it comes to maintaing Windows, you would not only have known this, but would only know how to clean out a system (even Win3.1 or 95) without formatting and starting over.

      You know, I am also tired of the ignorance on maintaining Windows from Slashdot readers as well. Your name has just been added to the list. :)

  117. how about removing redundant sw from linux distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn if each and every one of the major linux distros comes loaded with at least 50% more software on it than I'll ever need.

    How about just a clean linux base easy to install which needs 200mb of disk?

  118. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by mniskin · · Score: 0

    mon aéroglisseur est plein des anguilles

  119. Thanks for the info! by Mafiew · · Score: 1

    Woah, I had no idea. I will miss those siren sounds though every time i clean my computer.

  120. Pretty much crap for Linux user by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For Linux user this article is a crap.

    Why TF should I remove all the stuff from my harddrive ?

    I just review the list of packages and
    search for large files.

    When the time comes for new OS version
    I usually just use standard tools to upgrade.

    Clean reinstall is Windows-wolrd thing..

  121. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Use a registry scrubber (once again I point folk to toniarts.com and EasyCleaner), and with rare exceptions (which can usually be rooted out by hand) the problem goes away.

    And yes, a system set in stone helps, but even one that's used for checking out the program of the week can be stable indefinitely, given basic maintenance. Hell, my "test everything that comes along" box runs WinME of all things, and with just ordinary care, after all that abuse is still 100% stable (ZERO crashes in over two years now).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  122. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    My own records -- original installations, ZERO reinstalls, still fast and stable:

    WFWG 3.11: 7 years*+ (retired at age 7, at the time with over 2 years 100% crash-free)
    Win95: 4.5 yrs*+, 7 yrs, 7.5 yrs (3 machines in use)
    Win98: 2.5 yrs*+
    WinME: 2.5 yrs+ (over 2 yrs 100% crash-free)
    WinXP: 1 yr

    * These three work(ed) their asses off and run 24/7 for weeks at a time.
    + and these are loaded to the gills with all sorts of software.

    As to your wife's Win98, does it get defragged and tempfiles cleaned *weekly*?? Have you used a registry cleaner on it? Checked it for spyware? Even a neglected system can be brought back to life with such easy steps. About the only things that can't be cured are random deletia (such as killing directories rather than using the proper uninstaller) and the mess made by installing IE5.5 or later (5.0 is the last performance-safe version).

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  123. Re:A bit offtopic: Cleaning the keyboard. by Reziac · · Score: 1

    Ya know the old biblical story about having to make bricks without straw?? Our water here is so hard, we can make bricks without mud!!

    Think I'm exaggerating?? You didn't see the two pounds of calcium-salt crystals I just dredged out of the bottom of the swamp cooler. And that's just one year's worth.

    As to cleaning my keyboard, I find plastic twisty ties work well.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  124. He has only 700MB of data??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I keep all my data files in one folder, with lots of subfolders for different types of information. Which means backup is simply a matter of slipping a blank CD into the CD-writing drive and copying that one folder to the CD."
    Wow, he has only 700MB worth of data... Even if I exclude all my Programms and Free-/Share-/Etc.-ware-installers I still have around 50GB of "pure" data... I guess it's no wonder I didn't back-up in a long time...

  125. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 1

    The only good time to reinstall the OS is if there is something wrong with it.

    If there is something wrong with it, why reinstall it when you could just install something that works?

    --
    Beep beep.
  126. Spring cleaning Gentoo by PimpNinjaWannaBee · · Score: 0

    I try to reinstall my Gentoo box every week. That way
    I know my programs are always up to date, optimized for
    my particular arch, and my cpu-utilization tops out at a
    perfect 100%.

  127. SuperCleaner by supz · · Score: 2, Informative

    I feel I should plug this program, since it's relevant to the topic. It's called SuperCleaner, and can be found here: http://www.southbaypc.com/SuperCleaner/. It does a rather nice job cleaning up random garbage files on your system, however you have to pay to register it, for anybody that might be turned off by that sort of thing. It only cost me a few dollars to register it back in the day, however the price tag has gone up a lot to $32.99.

    Are there any OpenSource/Freeware alternatives to this program, that anybody can suggest?

  128. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by skillet-thief · · Score: 1
    Had you used win2k/xp, I wouldn't have said that, but as an 'expert amateur' using dos/win95/98/2k and xp, (regcleaning, spy-ware busting, occaisonal virusscanning et all) I can say with confidence that win9x sucks the big one compared to the newer kernels.

    Except that I would have to buy a lot of new RAM in that case.

    Do yourself a favour...get win2k/xp...hell, even linux is better than a win9x OS :)

    My other boxes are running Debian... Win9x crashes once a day, avg., Debian when the power goes out.

    Cheers

    --

    Congratulations! Now we are the Evil Empire

  129. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by babbage · · Score: 1
    Overkill. This is just overkill. If you want to learn how to non-drastically keep a Windows box alive & well, you could do a lot worse than to poke through O'Reilly's Annoyances books & web site -- you can find the Win95 edition in a lot of remainders bins these days, and the advice really hasn't changed drastically with later versions of Windows.

    Essentially, if you just get passingly familiar with browsing the registry, you can save yourself a lot of headaches in the long run. If anything is a problem, it's not that the registry is unmanagable, but that that regedit.exe is such a crude tool for browsing the database: really you ought to be able to use something with global find & replace, etc, but regedit doesn't provide anything like that. A better alternative is Lavasoft's RegHance, which makes working with the registry a bit easier -- and while you're at it, Lavasoft's AdAware for cleaning out spyware regularly.

    In any case though, if you just get a rough feel for how things are organized, then you realize that there are only a handful of places where broken software can pull the system performance down. Just keeping the registry key for launching software on boot time well pruned gets you 80% of the way there, and pruning IE's reg tree of parasites (as AdAware can do for you automagically) gets you to 95% there most of the time.

    Hearing people say that a regular reinstall is a better idea than registry maintainence is like hearing people advocate regular engine rebuilds on your car when a periodic oil change would have been much cheaper & much less painful -- it's a weird combination of naivete, ignorance, and cargo cultism that has never really made sense, and is only worse now that Win2k & WinXP are really pretty mature operating systems that don't need to be handled in such a hamfisted way anymore. Please join the 21st century & quit reinstalling your OS -- you'll be glad you did :-)

  130. Don't disassemble the demi-boards on a FlexPro! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Key Tronic FlexPro demi-boards (the two sections that rise) have to be assembled with jigs at the factory. A factory tech warned me about that. (This refers to the ones made by FlexPro; some other company is making them, now.)

    Enby in Waltham

  131. Re:how about removing redundant sw from linux dist by buck_wild · · Score: 1

    DOS came on a single floppy. Good luck with that.

    --
    If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  132. ...that last paragraph shoulda read... by Reziac · · Score: 1

    "...their relatively *new* computer..."

    Well, maybe we are related to our computers by this time of night :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  133. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I've got to call bs on this one. Please explain the timeframes of these installs, your hard drive space can't possibly be sufficient to hold win2k if it was from the era of win3.1!

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  134. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by bluehand · · Score: 1

    Sorry
    if i havent made this clear
    the HD have been upgraded a number of times
    as the partition simply copied over to the new hd and expanded
    the New HD is a 36GB Cheetah that didnt exist in the time of win3.1

  135. Re:Stop! Don't Do it. by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    Makes perfect sense, sorry!

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name