Slashdot Mirror


Real-World Hyperlinks

RunAmuk writes "Wired is reporting about being able to "Point and click your mobile phone at a poster in London movie theaters this July and you'll be able to directly access the movie's Web page." While there are many practical uses for this technology, like in museums as the article suggests." I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

322 comments

  1. Oooooh! by aborchers · · Score: 5, Funny

    A long-range Cue Cat!

    --
    Trouble making decisions? Just flip for it.
    1. Re:Oooooh! by thud2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Exactly what I thought too. Whatever these marketers are on, I want some. "If you look at this ad, you may be rewarded with ... ANOTHER ad for the same thing! Act now!"

    2. Re:Oooooh! by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's say it all together now...."conVERGence". Bah.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    3. Re:Oooooh! by K8Fan · · Score: 1
      A long-range Cue Cat!

      Funny, but true. This application makes so much more sense than the actual CueCat business model - people reading magazines while seated at a computer. If they had thought this one up first, they might still exist. But then, the people in charge thought up their original business model, so probably not.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    4. Re:Oooooh! by gordon_schumway · · Score: 2, Funny

      Goddamnit people! It's ':Cue:Cat'!

      Eri:c :Chavez
      :CEO, Digital :Convergen:ce

      --

      Ha! I kill me!

    5. Re:Oooooh! by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 1

      You forgot one thing, it should say:

      "If you look at this ad, you may be rewarded with ... ANOTHER ad for the same thing [that you get to pay the bandwidth bill for!]"

      --
      A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
    6. Re:Oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be Stimutax!

      Whoah! It's like a koala bear crapped a rainbow in my brain!

    7. Re:Oooooh! by afidel · · Score: 1

      Hey I never looked at an ad and I was rewarded with a free barcode scanner that allowed me to build a little database to track the ~500 tapes in our autochanger and the storage bins. This way when I have to go look for old tapes that Veritas tells me can now be reused I don't have to look through every tape, I just put the label numbers into the DB and it tells me which bin and tray they are in.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    8. Re:Oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I point it at the cute secretary in the front office and be directed to her secret Web Cam?

    9. Re:Oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you pointed at some hot chick would you get the pr0n she's done?

    10. Re:Oooooh! by spazoid12 · · Score: 1

      Exactly... and exactly why CmdrTaco's comment was dumb:

      I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

      What video store is he visiting that requires you to stand 100 yards away from the shelves and not handle the movie?

      In the case of hundreds of items stored closely together that you are expected to pick up in your hands... wouldn't you just have a regular barcode reader or something on your phone?

      You wouldn't use a megaphone to talk to your honey in bed...

    11. Re:Oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also will be inconvenient for the video store to change the battery powering the transmitter on each package.

    12. Re:Oooooh! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Hey, I read magazines at my :Computer!

      Of :Course, that's after I've thumbed through them many, many, many times on the :Cou:ch. Yahoo! Internet Life had (I say had because they disappeared be:cause, what was it, oh yeah, ZDNet didn't like the image they were proje:cting by :catering to home users...) a tear-out web-guide with a downloadable version at their site (integrated into your bookmarks). Of :course, my :Cue:Cat needs a little repair to it's PS/2 cable so I can actually plug it in (CLK appears to be screwed to hell, so anything fast loses characters :-()

    13. Re:Oooooh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goddamnit. This guy gets 5, Funny. I post the same thing, under 60 seconds later, and get 0, Redundant. Fuck. I LOSE karma for something semi-useful, while he GETS it. Why the difference? Because we were thinking the same bloody thing! Bastards.

  2. Still no cure for cancer... by hendridm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Send pictures, check your e-mail, surf the Internet, and instantly pull up movie reviews!*

    ...

    *Note: Requires $10 activation fee, you must upgrade to the $59.99/month package, and you will be charged $0.39/minute for every minute you go over your already worthless amount of daytime minutes.

  3. RFID by frieked · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is it me or does this seem like nothing more than making a movie poster an RFID and a cellphone a portable reader?

    --

    I have often regretted my speech, never my silence.
    -Xenocrates
    1. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's just you.

    2. Re:RFID by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Sounds more like a cellphone with a built-in CueCat or whatever. WILL IT EVER DIE?!

    3. Re:RFID by BKDotCom · · Score: 1

      No, it's me too.

      Some say conspiracy. I say nifty and close to worthless.

    4. Re:RFID by pVoid · · Score: 4, Funny
      I find it funny that all the replies to this post somehow are tinted with the idea that the original post was being paranoid about RFID.

      Pavlov would have a field day on this site... you guys hear the bell "RFID" and you can't help but start salivating.

      I think the parent post was just pointing out the simplicity in such a gadget - not its invasion of your so precious privacy.

    5. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Condom"? What is this "condom" you speak of?

      Dammit, my weiner's itching again. I'll be back.

    6. Re:RFID by Mike+Markley · · Score: 1

      > you guys hear the bell "RFID" and you can't help but start salivating.

      It's funny... as near as I can tell, RFID is just fancier barcodes. Despite being the kind of geek who refuses to buy Microsoft products, builds computers just to install free OSes on them, abhors the one-click patent, and in general finds himself responding to most of the causes that are espoused on Slashdot, I've never seen what the big friggin' deal is.

      I'm sure someone will attempt to enlighten me now, though. :)

    7. Re:RFID by mcc · · Score: 1

      Actually, my original thought upon seeing Taco's "it would be cool to point my cell phone at a CD in a store and get a review" was "yeah, it's too bad that RFID has been so universally condemned it's more or less been scrapped, or that might have been possible sometime soon".

      (Of course, I am naively assuming that the RFID-lookup-get-review thing would be controlled somehow by the consumer and not Erricson Mobile (a subsidiary of Sony). In my dream, though, phones eventually begin to resemble PDAs more and more, and when I point my phone at a CD in a store it checks to see if there's some kind of wireless product-information server in the store, talks to it, and gives whatever information about that CD the store wants me to see.. but then I press some other button I've configured to do something special, and the phone blips off and talks to some kind of perl script i have off on a website somewhere, which takes the information from the RFID and queries the Web Services of various online stores and tells me what the prices for that cd are online, and what the amazon listener reviews are, so I know if i'm getting ripped off...

      Of course, hoping I'd have that much control over my phone isn't unrealistic.. I'm *told* that with my Sprint/Samsung phone, there's some way I can write programs for it and install them on the phone.. I, um, just haven't figured out what that actually *is*..)

      But, of course, step one of that isn't going to happen unless RFIDs, or something like them, are actually installed in all those CD cases. And we all know how well the adoption for that is going.

      Either way, I think europe's really onto something with the way that cell phones there are turning from phones into little personal digital.. gadgets. I don't know what the utility is of paying for a coke machine with my phone or looking at LXG's webpage when i pass by the movie theater, but I like where they seem to be going with this :)

    8. Re:RFID by maxume · · Score: 1
      don't know what the utility is of paying for a coke machine with my phone

      I don't usually carry change, and I like to get big gobs of money from the atm, and then spend it till it's gone. If all I have are 5 and better, I can't work the damn pop machine. But I carry my phone everywhere. Oooooh, can I order pop with my phone? I wish I could...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oooooh, can I order pop with my phone? I wish I could...

      You can, if you move to Finland.

    10. Re:RFID by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I'm sure someone will attempt to enlighten me now, though. :) That's my :Cue...

      Early barcodes were viewed with great suspicion. People did not understand that they were just printing in computer-only font. Add the "mysteries of lasers" to people whose only experiences with computers to date had been a punch-card phone bill that they heard charged their neighbor $9999.99 for long distance, and movies such as Colossus or James Bond where lasers were used only to cut good guys in half and yeah, people were paranoid.

      And somehow, we'd like to think more of ourselves at this point, that we're more technologically enlightened.

      Truth is, more of us are more enlightened. We have seen large databases, and we have seen them misused. We have seen technology used to provide us with new and better advertising (via browser cookies, credit card purchases, etc.); terrorist tracking in airports where the wrong bits in a database cause a code at the bottom of your ticket to mean "body cavity search"; streetlight mounted cameras issuing red-light tickets; U.S. Government announcements regarding systems such as TIA, etc, etc, etc. We have all seen the abuses, and have no reason to think the situation will get better instead of worse.

      The reason RFID is viewed differently from barcodes is twofold.

      • RFID is permanent, and
      • RFID can be read without your permission.
      Barcodes are typically printed on tags ripped off at the point of sale, or printed on the packaging that is thrown away when the consumer gets home. A barcode in your pocket means nothing. It stays your business because nobody and nothing can see it unless you choose to show it to them. But current RFID proposals use durable tags manufactured into the goods and meant to stay permanently in the merchandise. And they can be read from eight feet away via a hidden antenna in the ceiling (or in the ubiquitous security antennas flanking every nearly every store entrance these days.)

      So, got RFID in your jacket, your jeans, your wallet, your credit cards? Let's just have a look as you pass through our fancy store entrance. "$400 shoes, $59.99 khaki Dockers, $89.99 shirt, $19.99 naughty underwear; and three Gold and two Platinum cards with a total current open credit line of $69,252. Send two scantily-clad female salespeople immediately, and change the video posters to 'Dominatrix Theme #3'." [All you geeks wish, anyway.]

      Contrast that image with "Mismatched tennis shoes, $7.99 Wal*Mart jeans that we tracked through a Goodwill store last December, and an army surplus greatcoat. No credit cards and one Illinois food stamp card detected. Food stamp card cross referenced to CrimNet: holder Joe Smith is African-American, has two counts of drunken brawls in taverns, and marijuana charges dropped since successful completion of rehab. Lives in Cabrini Green. Change the video posters to flashing red 'Security Alert Theme #1', start the tracking cameras following this guy immediately, and send two burly security officers to encourage him to complete his shopping experience at Wal*Mart."

      Now, take the same guy and dress him up in nice clothes, but leave the food stamp card in his wallet. Same guy, different look. He's still going to get escorted out of the store for the dual crimes of being poor and shopping while black. And now that process can be automated.

      Has the second guy committed a crime? Some people might say, "not yet, but he sure fits the profile." Others would say that he won't because with a tracking system like this, he would never get the chance to steal. But the honest answer is still, "no, he has done nothing wrong." And now does he get the same opportunity as Mr. Khakis above? Not any more.

      --
      John
    11. Re:RFID by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      does this seem like nothing more than making a movie poster an RFID and a cellphone a portable reader?

      Depends how it's done. A simple version could involve a bar code reader in the phone, and a bar code on the relevant poster. RFID could do it as well, but the scanners are probably expensive.

      Shit, if the bar code was basically the IMDB ID for the movie, then I'd buy it. However, if it points you to "pre-approved" reviews, then it's pointless. You could watch the trailer with a 3G phone as well though.

    12. Re:RFID by paganizer · · Score: 1

      That has got to be the Very Best explanation of why RFID is evil that I have ever seen.
      Can we get a "+15, scarily on target" mod here please?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    13. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like, I walk into the CD store with my 3G cell phone and use it to look for ads rather than just downloading the content of the CD off the net. Uhm duh.

    14. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post! For more horror...

      AutoID Overview
      The Internet of Things
    15. Re:RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. But your comment offers a simple solution: Put RFID where the barcodes normally are. Then all the bad annoying things are gone, but all the good inventory tracking things are still there. Why don't they propose this instead? I can't see the putting it on a tag and not in the product thing as removing any features usefull to retailers, but it certainly would be a lot easier to convince consumers to adopt.

    16. Re:RFID by SEWilco · · Score: 1
      You mean "put RFID on a tag or packaging which is removed by the consumer". But an advantage of RFID is that the devices can be installed during manufacture, such as by being sewn into a seam, and then used during the rest of manufacturing and throughout the distribution system. Putting in labels or packaging is too late.

      Many items are manufactured in one country, labeled in one language in another country, and packaged in a third country where it will be sold. Such as a shirt made someplace in the world, labeled in English in a former British colony for sale to English-speaking areas, and packaged in the USA in a way which meets current laws (nutritional value of the shirt, pollution released when decomposed or incinerated, washing instructions for this year's 3 largest washing machine manufacturers, energy requirements to keep you warm or cool when wearing this shirt, and warnings that this shirt does not fasten itself, should not be used to save a drowning person, can not safely tow a car, may rip at an inconvenient time, should not be worn near machinery including an automobile, and is not suitable for mailing without proper packaging).

    17. Re:RFID by plover · · Score: 1
      As the previous respondent said, more than just the retailer is interested in where this merchandise has been and where it is going.

      Something you may not realize is that retailers do not want to hang tags on their merchandise themselves. It costs way too much in labor and handling to uncrate the merchandise, stick tags on it, put it back in a bin, and hang it on the sales floor. The cost of handling and the cost of the label of store-level tagging far exceeds even the current price of RFID chips. Major retail chains have enough purchasing power to demand all merchandise be tagged for them by the manufacturers. So if the vendor is going to be coerced by the retailer into tagging the merchandise anyway, they too will benefit by inserting the tags earlier in the chain so they can use the automated ID in handling their own products. This also produces the side benefit to the retailer of having the tag embedded deeply in the product, discouraging or even preventing dressing-room tampering. How can you remove the tag if it was cast right into the sole of those $150 Nikes? Being 0.3mm^2 means being hard to find.

      Another potential RFID benefit to both customers and merchants is that of returns. When a customer walks into a store and says "I want to return this stuff" the merchant can pull up the sale history of the merchandise, and immediately credit the customer's charge card or return the cash. No checks need to be mailed, no receipts needed; there's no quibble about whether or not the merchandise was purchased at the store in question or how it was paid for.

      Merchants today see only good in RFID (except for the unit cost.) It eliminates the extra step required to place security tags on merchandise, it eliminates the expensive and clunky magnetic removers bolted to the checkout stands, it speeds checkout by eliminating the time spent scanning, and it prevents sweethearting at the register (ringing the item at a cheap price for your buddies.)

      Merchants are probably not yet looking at tracking merchandise reentering their stores, wandering the aisles; or in interpreting other retailers' merchandise tags. The tags themselves will probably emit simple serial numbers that will not bear any evidence to say "this chip and merchandise was manufactured for sale by Target," but only because Target wouldn't want Wal*Mart to benefit from tracking Target customers around their stores.

      Merchants are not overly concerned with customer privacy issues any more than is legally or politically required (HIPAA-Privacy, for example.) They will of course take steps to protect their data because it is prudent for them to do so, but they would not question or argue a court order to turn over RFID tracking data on a product. But they will also bow to popular pressure. Talking heads on the evening news saying "Wal*Mart is tracking your every move, film at 11" does get attention, and not the good kind.

      Finally, the Holy Grail hope among merchants is that micro-detailed merchandise tracking will lead to detailed descriptions of willing buyers of more merchandise. I don't know if it's fair to call this behavior "insidous" simply because it's so overtly obvious. Merchandising is what retailers DO. It's just they think with RFID that they can do it better.

      --
      John
  4. Is it just me... by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 0, Redundant

    or does this resemble cuecat quite a lot?

  5. Hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    While there are many practical uses for this technology, like in museums as the article suggests.

    The submitter's phone must have rang while he was typing and hit the submit button prior to sentence completetion. That, or he has ADD.

    1. Re:Hmmm.. by s88 · · Score: 1

      While I too noticed that fragment in the post.

    2. Re:Hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      like in museums

      Lickin museums? I be barely knowin museums!

  6. P2P networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

    You must be new to the Internet.

    1. Re:P2P networks by DogFog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Using the internet AT the CD/rental place is the problem though... sure you could have your wireless LAN and PocketPC and whatever but just pointing your cellphone is so much easier.

  7. Taco Says...... by phunhippy · · Score: 1

    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

    But would you be willing to pay for that kind of data? I know I would not...

    1. Re:Taco Says...... by Purificator · · Score: 1

      Right. Someone's going to have a patent on this, so anyone who wants to use it will have to pay (either at the provider or user end --and maybe both).

      I agree it's a cool idea; unfortunately it's too cool not to have someone grab it for cash and come out suing.

      --
      "Mister Potato-head --MISTER POTATO-HEAD! Backdoors are not secrets!" (War Games, 1983)
    2. Re:Taco Says...... by 56 · · Score: 1

      offtopic, but I liked your pictures, especially the black and white infared ones.

    3. Re:Taco Says...... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      .. and why not use the browsers(there are better options than the inbuilt for 7650/3650) for browsing imdb?

      sure it takes a bit of a work to press some buttons for 10-20 secs.. but it's HERE RIGHT NOW. and doesn't cost besides the data and for data there are very affordable and usable rates now.

      hmm.. but i would have to stop constant irc'ing for few minutes while at the rental... that's no good- i need my fix!-

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  8. this better not replace what's already at museums! by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For example, it could be used in museums and galleries, where visitors could download high-quality audio and visual content about exhibits.

    Will this hinder museums from adding both visual and audio cues to their exhibits? I personally think that cell phones should be banned in public places such as museums and this will just encourage Joe to hop on his cell phone and chat with Mary while I am trying to enjoy some peace and quiet.

    I saw some really interesting usages of computers in museums (like here, I realise this is more of a piece of art, but you get the idea).

    Keep the cell phones out and enjoy getting away from things that you see and use everyday.

    Just my worthless .02

  9. Love the hackability.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Oh this would be such fun to hack..

    Child: Daddy, what's that "Finding Nemo 2" about?
    Father: Let's look on our phone, son.
    >clicky click click
    Father: Hmm.. it appears to be about a man stretching his bottom wide open.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Love the hackability.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahaha goatse is so funny lolololololololol wow that is the greatest joke ever that I have yet to read wow goatse I never heard that before haha

    2. Re:Love the hackability.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ain't seen nothing yet! Before I got laid off at my last job with a major printer manufacturer, I managed to insert THE GOAT as the test page data. The new models should be out in a couple months!

  10. Could we do it with people too? by Jerk+City+Troll · · Score: 0, Interesting

    It'd be kind of interesting (particularly at conventions like H2Kx or Defcon) to pull up a person's chosen public information or web site.

    "I can't remember that info right now. Click on me to see my blog." You could also figure out who in the room has an interesting role or get public encryption keys, etc.

    You could have all kinds of fun with this.

  11. Are you kidding? by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.
    Are you kidding? Consumers with the power to make instant informed decisions? The (music/movie/software/etc) industry would sh*t a brick!
    1. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you're still going to Blockbuster and buying music data from brick and mortar stores? Get with the program, it's 2003 for crissakes! There's amazon and netflix. Make your purchases and rentals from the comfort of your own home with all the information you need.

      Or you could just download it all...

    2. Re:Are you kidding? by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, they aren't kidding. The industry is not going to be afraid of that if the review site is owned by the same company making the movie, which I guarantee will be the case. Every movie distributor will want a piece of the action to make sure the information you see and hear about THEIR movie is exactly what you should be hearing (in their minds). They will *pay* for that priviledge. And if your cell minutes are used to do this, so will you.

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
    3. Re:Are you kidding? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Informed opinions?

      Yeah I'm sure the publishers are going to link their products to objective reviews - even if they are bad.

      So why not use your www enabled phone to google your own reviews? Well, that type of thing has been out for months now - we need something hot and new!

      It'll just be all the same hype on the back of the box - for pinheads who want to read it on something electronic for a couple bucks a pop. Or perhaps are too lazy to turn the box over.

      This isn't an article or news of course. Just an advertisement for a service that shows you advertisements. Paying for commercials. Sheesh.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Are you kidding? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

      I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

      Are you kidding? Consumers with the power to make instant informed decisions?

      The only way I'd consider these movie reviews to help me making informed decisions would be if those hyperlinks are pointing towards the relevant entry at this site!

      GMD

    5. Re:Are you kidding? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Awesome post, I couldn't have put it better myself. Just two things I'd like to add though. This WOULD be a cool thing if perhaps you could set it to get reviews off of a site you choose. Perhaps some kind of XML tag or something could be used. This would require it to be open source technology....which would never happen, but the benefit would be if you didn't like all of the reviews that were um.....'biased' you could get them off of a site you trusted instead.

      The other thing I'd like to point out is with the new Do Not Call registry....I wonder if using your cellphone for something like this would be considered 'establishing a business relationship' and thus entitle them to spam you. Granted, at that point its not spam.....so I don't know if the law about spamming cellphones would apply. But just a thought.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  12. Pop-Ups? by retto · · Score: 5, Funny

    Point and click your mobile phone at a poster in London movie theaters this July and you'll be able to directly access the movie's Web page.

    Is some guy wearing a sign going to jump in front of me and start blathering on about casinos or cheap travel discounts?

    1. Re:Pop-Ups? by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmmm, or how about maybe a guy in a goofy butterfly outfit putting you in a headlock if you try to show the info on an 'R' rated film to some kid?

      Ahhh, parental controls....

    2. Re:Pop-Ups? by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

      Or how about a guy in a monkey suit running around with a sign reading "Zap the monkey!"

      If anything, that would cause a spike in the sales of cattle prods and tazers

    3. Re:Pop-Ups? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > a guy in a goofy butterfly outfit putting you in a headlock if you try to show the info on an 'R' rated film

      I saw one of those MSN commercials and it kinda' scared me what they block out as "harmful." Like rap music?

    4. Re:Pop-Ups? by leonardop · · Score: 1
      Is some guy wearing a sign going to jump in front of me and start blathering on about casinos or cheap travel discounts?
      For that exact reason it is recommended that you carry some kind of pop-up blocker device with you... You know, like a stun-gun or a pepper spray.
    5. Re:Pop-Ups? by yintercept · · Score: 1

      I suspect that this will lead to eBates paradise (or is that purgatory?). When you walk through the grocery store, your cell phone will be ringing up with ads for the competitor's store.

      To protect themselves from the ads, stores will start adding jamming devices for cell phones, and all sorts of cool technologies will evolve as advertisers find ways to become even more intrusive.

      When ad companies get their grubby little hands on this technology, they will be able to quickly decrease the quality of life on this planet.

    6. Re:Pop-Ups? by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

      What' really ironic is that anything the butterfly would really block, they probably can't show on TV, so you never really see what you're missing...

    7. Re:Pop-Ups? by been42 · · Score: 1


      Is some guy wearing a sign going to jump in front of me and start blathering on about casinos or cheap travel discounts?

      I'd love to be there the first time someone gets the "punch the monkey" ad.

    8. Re:Pop-Ups? by Diotallevi · · Score: 1

      could get dangerous in crowded theaters...public linchings??

      --
      Never underestimate the logical power of sarcasm
    9. Re:Pop-Ups? by Diotallevi · · Score: 1

      sad thing is some advertising weenie is thinking that...and how much the customers would love the interactive movie experience.

      --
      Never underestimate the logical power of sarcasm
    10. Re:Pop-Ups? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > anything the butterfly would really block, they probably can't show on TV

      Good point. :) Damn Censorship! They should show me what I'm trying not to see, to make sure I know that I really don't want to see it! hehe.

    11. Re:Pop-Ups? by notque · · Score: 1

      Is some guy wearing a sign going to jump in front of me and start blathering on about casinos or cheap travel discounts?

      "Buy my book, Buy my book, Buy my book" - Jay Sherman

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    12. Re:Pop-Ups? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget the advertisers will make more powerful transmitters so you can pick up their billboard by pointing in the direction of the city, and also will be jamming the competing ads.

  13. Yep, there's the rub by w.p.richardson · · Score: 1
    Nice idea, but I ain't gonna pay for it. These things are nickel and diming me to death as it is. $X/month for broadband, $Y/month for cell phone, $Z/month for slashdot subscription...

    There reaches a point (for everyone) eventually where enough is enough! My tolerance ends well before something like this.

    --

    Curb CO2 emissions: Kill yourself today!

  14. How about BILLING PRICE CUTS ???? by zymano · · Score: 0
    How about also the Government getting out of extorting money from our Radio Spectrum and just be a caretaker instead of an Owner. The SPECTRUM belongs to the people and not to them and the highest Corporate bidder.

    You would see phone bills of 10 bucks monthly then.

  15. Wearable bar-codes by darth_MALL · · Score: 1

    Put a readable tag on yer clothes Women will zap it. Instant romance! ZING! I picked the wrong day to quit sniffing glue.

    1. Re:Wearable bar-codes by faxafloi · · Score: 1
      Put a readable tag on yer clothes Women will zap it. Instant romance! ZING!

      Or they'll zap it, /.'ll come up, and... well, that'll be the end of that...
      --
      Exit, pursued by a bear.
  16. Wait until this technology matures by Trigun · · Score: 1

    And you can point your phone at women in the bar
    and get her bio, likes and dislikes, and the statistical probability of her going home with you...

    I'll commit suicide before then...

    1. Re:Wait until this technology matures by flying_triguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if you are seriously reading this article,
      and thinking about the consequences I can tell you
      the statistical probability right now... Zeroooooo

      D

    2. Re:Wait until this technology matures by Trigun · · Score: 1

      That's it, goodbye creul world!

    3. Re:Wait until this technology matures by Trigun · · Score: 1

      Man, I can't spell.
      cruel.

      Although the correct spelling is pretty ugly as well.

    4. Re:Wait until this technology matures by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      And you can point your phone at women in the bar
      and get her bio, likes and dislikes, and the statistical probability of her going home with you...


      I think we can safely hardcode probability of her going home with some geek pointing his cell phone at her, at 0.01%.

      Oh, wait, if it's a slashdotter with the cell phone, I suppose we'll have to allow for negative percentages.

    5. Re:Wait until this technology matures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Percentages can't be negative, you silly dumbtard.

  17. Something Similar Already Here by wbav · · Score: 1

    If you've been to Borders lately, you may have noticed a device that you can scan a movie or cd and get a sample of the media. How is this very different? (Other than getting to the web)

    Perhaps if there were reviews, but what keeps a company from only showing you the positive reviews?

    The flip side is also true, if you open it up to everyone to comment on, the media or movie, then there's a greater chance that someone will post a spoiler and ruin it for you.

    However, not to write the whole thing off, if there was a system of reviews like Amazon, and the reviews were handeled by a third party, this could be quite nice to have as a general consumer.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
  18. Are you sure that is a good idea? by Prince_Ali · · Score: 1
    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

    *points cellphone at The Animal*
    Cellphone: That is excellent. May I also suggest you buy the movies on either side of it. They are also wonderful. In fact, I think you would enjoy every movie on the shelf. You should buy them all.

    1. Re:Are you sure that is a good idea? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 1

      Well put. I can't see why a video or CD store would provide hyperlinks to completly unbiased reviews of the products they are trying to sell or rent. Most likely, large stores like Blockbuster could have the resources to write reviews of most of the products they sell and set the hyperlinks to point to those glowing reviews. So I don't see this as much of a benefit to the consumer.

      Of course, it might be quite useful to the stores themselves. By recording how many people click for reviews on what products, they might be able to determine things like how effective their display shelves are, what types of people are potentially interested in what products and so on. Hell, what's to stop the store from placing a cookie on your cell-phone and tracking which movies you are asking reviews for?

      Then there's the whole issue of whether you want the store to be tracking your interests. Can you imagine the warning lights that would go off if you are under 18 and asking for a review of "Cum Buttered Cornholes Vol. 6"? Or if you have an Arabic-sounding last name and have been asking for reviews on action shoot-em-up movies? Might as well turn yourself in to Asscroft right now.

      GMD

    2. Re:Are you sure that is a good idea? by WeeLad · · Score: 1
      I'm trying to remember....was this one of the movies that they got in trouble for making up review taglines? I remember the midevievil (sp?) one with the Aussie was one of them and I thought there were one or two more.

      I think those reviews are great. They take a sentence "This movie gave me explosive diarrhea!!!" and turn it into "... explosive ..."

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    3. Re:Are you sure that is a good idea? by GT_Alias · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Good point, I'm sure every review will be "two thumbs up! WAYYYYY up!"

      It would be a lot better if the product simply advertised what it is (instead of sending you somewhere). Then you could customize your cellphone/PDA with how to handle the incoming information. So assume they have a protocol where it reports what type of product it is (album, movie, whatever) along w/ info to specifically identify it, then you could set up your PDA to automatically visit your preferred movie review site(s), handing in the movie ID as a parameter.

      But that might put way too much power in the hands of the consumer, and we want to avoid that if at all possible.

    4. Re:Are you sure that is a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      midevievil (sp?)

      Umm...yeah, something like that.

  19. CmdrTaco screwed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone else notice how that last sentence is half italicized, half normal?

  20. Practical Applications by ThePolemarch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I saw the *applications* described in the articles, but reallistically, how much time does that save? Yes, you are taken directly to the web page, thus providing a measure of convenience of not navigating to the page yourself, but I can't see widespread use of this technology for the applications mentioned. To me, any review of a movie, which you are sent to by those advertising the movie, has to be at least a bit biased.

    Besides. . .who wants more ads?

    --

    A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong, gives it a superficial appearance of being right.
    -Thomas Paine
  21. Old hat by deuist · · Score: 1

    This idea has been around for quite a while. I remember several years ago a mobile phone company had a system in which users could buy a song online upon hearing it on the radio.

  22. It seems like more tech than needed. by mikeophile · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Many newer cell phones have GPS and web capability.

    Wouldn't it be easier to visit a website set up for this purpose and send the locational data to get a lookup of everything posted for those coordinates?

    That way, we wouldn't be limited to the information that was paid for in the case of a movie theater being linked to the "official" site.

    Actual reviews could be posted, dare I say, moderated upon as well?

    1. Re:It seems like more tech than needed. by mechaZardoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, but consider that most civilian GPS receivers only have an accuracy of about 100 feet ( marine GPS transceiver accuracy); which means that standing on any given street corner you'd catch a lot of potential businesses. This one upside of this technology is that it great reduces the ranges and increases the specificity of the source of the info.

    2. Re:It seems like more tech than needed. by Gurami · · Score: 1

      Actually, civilian GPS units' accuracy hasn't been that bad for a few years.

      Unaugmented GPS receivers have an accuracy of about 10m. What the poster was referring to was back in the day when SA or "Selective Availability" was still in effect. Clinton terminated SA in 2000, and it hasn't been put back into effect since the military can enforce theatre-based SA.

      Augmented GPS (via coast gaurd DGPS or FAA WAAS) often has an accuracy of 3m.

    3. Re:It seems like more tech than needed. by afidel · · Score: 1

      Differential GPS with augmentation is capable or 1cm accuracy. MIT has an autonomous helicopter that pilots based on such a system. It is able to navigate a 3D course, pick up cargo and drop it in a small target zone based just on the GPS information.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  23. Cute chicks by rhfrommn · · Score: 2

    Could you point it at a cute chick and get her phone number?

    Would make a trip to the bar way more efficient. No need for all that drink buying and small talk.

    --
    My motto is: Never give up - unless it's harder than you want it to be.
  24. I don't know about you. by headbulb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But when I leave the computer I don't really wanna take it with me. I don't wanna phone that can get internet. I want a phone that is simple... I have a dad that has a pda, digital camera, gps. Its beyond annoying when you have to stop because someone in your group has to check the gps corodanites for the place you are at. Technology is great, But so is this world. Lets enjoy the world and technology, But make sure that we have a balance. If your balance is take your pda everywhere with you then thats your choise.

    1. Re:I don't know about you. by valkraider · · Score: 1

      I agree - unless the technology is used to help enjoy the world. For example - working on code via VPN while sitting in a park along the river is a *lot* nicer than in the office. But taking your laptop and GPS device so you can see exactly where in the middle of nowhere on I40 you are at all times is annoying. Having the phone to plan to meet up so you can catch a movie starting in 12 minutes is great. Sitting on the train discussing your family reuinion with your parents is annoying. There is a time and place for everything... ;)

    2. Re:I don't know about you. by Zebbers · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ummm
      if my fone has a pda and gps in it already
      and is no extra burden to have
      and i already need to carry my fone
      then it is good

    3. Re:I don't know about you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always find it a complete bitch when my woman insists on carrying her umbrella with her if theres a slight chance of rain - so it rains - so what - we never have THAT for to go to the car for dry refuge.

      And then when it does rain she insists on stopping to expand the thing into a big mobile tent that keeps us dry.

      Fucking technology!

    4. Re:I don't know about you. by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      But when I leave the computer I don't really wanna take it with me. I don't wanna phone that can get internet. I want a phone that is simple... I have a dad that has a pda, digital camera, gps. Its beyond annoying when you have to stop because someone in your group has to check the gps corodanites for the place you are at. Technology is great, But so is this world.

      Personally, I'd rather have the ability to hop onto the web, search online for the place I'm trying to reach, plunk in my current address from the GPS, and be able to get real turn-by-turn directions to where I'm trying to go. (This doesn't necessarily need an online connection, but you get more up-to-date information that way.)

      Finding one's way around without electronic access to information is much clumsier. Anything that expedites my enjoyment of the physical world is a good thing.

      Lets enjoy the world and technology, But make sure that we have a balance. If your balance is take your pda everywhere with you then thats your choise.

      Apparently not if they decide to go with you.

  25. CueCat writ large by samoore · · Score: 1

    Is this the return of the CueCat, but for the physical world outside of magazines? We'll not be restricted to pointing at magazine articles and ads this time. Wow! Remember how successful that was?!?

    Will its use be expanded to the singles scene, building security, etc.?

  26. The future is now ... by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

    ... soon, you will be able in pointing and clicking on your mobile phone towards any item (movie poster, game, application ad, ...) to get a XDCC/ed2k/torrent/FTP link/address to download that item before that the item is available.

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
  27. Sounds familiar by Quixote · · Score: 1, Redundant
    Hmm... I wonder if it will fare better than that feline, :::Cue::Cat::: ?

    I wonder if there is a market out there for such 'convergence' devices?

  28. The Matrix Has You! by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna have a transmitter on me so that whenever someone points their mobile phone at me, it'll say "Take the red pill". :)

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
  29. Possible uses by JoeCotellese · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to use it to point at a CD and get it queued in Kazaa.

  30. Minority Report advertising by GoVegan · · Score: 1

    I'll be happier when they come up with uses for technology like this that don't involve trying to make advertising more efficient. Minority Report, here we come!

    Maybe in a few more years it'll be nice, when you can point your phone at a movie poster and watch the trailer for the film, but for now it's just going to be another gimmick used to sell phones.

    1. Re:Minority Report advertising by GoVegan · · Score: 1

      And yes, I know that they mention watching trailers in the article, but I don't think watching trailers on today's mobile phones is going to be very effective or impressive.

    2. Re:Minority Report advertising by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      I just wish they'd be honest about the whole thing and own up to the fact that just about all of this crap is really just designed to make life easier for the marketing department. I cannot, for the life of me, imagine that, somewhere, somehow, some customer made a comment along the lines of, "You know what's really missing in my life is a more convenient way for [insert corporate brand here] to reach me directly."

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    3. Re:Minority Report advertising by notque · · Score: 1

      I'll be happier when they come up with uses for technology like this that don't involve trying to make advertising more efficient. Minority Report, here we come!

      Maybe in a few more years it'll be nice, when you can point your phone at a movie poster and watch the trailer for the film.


      Isn't the trailer for a film advertising?

      Those movie trailers start making me want to see films I normally wouldn't. I saw a trailer for some new Crocodile Dundee film, and everyone I was with had the same reaction.

      There is no way this movie will be any good, but damn if they didn't make it look like it might.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
  31. Why does my phone keep beeping? by curtisk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How are the phones choosing what to "receive", point and "click"? thats a little vague. And what happens if someone slams a bunch (of different ones) up on a wall, which tag, or do you get them all? Who will administer all these tags? Can coke go around and plop them on pepsi billboards? Can a prankster (heheh) make some to well, in essense spam users with their messages? It sounds like a cool idea, but the implementation issues sound potentially horrible.

    --

    Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    1. Re:Why does my phone keep beeping? by mechaZardoz · · Score: 1
      re-read the article:

      "Furthermore, you can place tags close together, so a user can select between several different pieces of content in one location," said Jonathan Morgan, CEO of Hypertag. Multiple tags located close to each other can provide a variety of information on the same subject.

      The Hypertag server manages the content linked to each tag, allowing tag owners to monitor and easily update what Web page consumers get on their phone when they click at the tag. New exhibits or more information would simply involve changing the content linked to a tag or adding more tags.

    2. Re:Why does my phone keep beeping? by Wrexen · · Score: 1

      You mean like you what can currently do with paper and glue? Advertisers don't seem to be vandalizing each others' billboards right now, I don't see how this is going to change anything. Nor do I see spammers putting stickers over movie theater ads in my city.

    3. Re:Why does my phone keep beeping? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paper is easy to rectify.
      "Hey look, someone put a poster over my billboard, ill go tear it down."

      IR/RFID isn't. Even if you walk around checking your ads w/ the appropraite equipment, these things are tiny and easy to hide.
      It's a totally different situation than w/ paper.

    4. Re:Why does my phone keep beeping? by aziraphale · · Score: 1

      > Advertisers don't seem to be vandalizing each others' billboards right now

      Must be nice to live in a city without fly posting. Maybe it's not a problem where you are.

      Most posters that are left up on bus stops or pavement signs in the city I live in (I'm in the UK) don't last long before some club flyer or get rich quick scheme is posted over the front of it. And it seems to be going legit - because 'the kids' are out looking for posted flyers advertising club nights ('DJ Spoonboy - Miss Missile - MC Donald - Spank @ The Love Zone - Every Thursday' etc.), 'proper' advertisers are starting to play their game - Charlie's Angels 2 was presaged by a huge fly posting campaign. Most new singles and albums are advertised on fly posters. I guess it reaches the audience they're after.

      But it does amount to a physical kind of pop-up spam, and it's worse because it has no close button. Still, for the most part they're only covering up other ads. And phone boxes. And telephone junction boxes. And walls. And windows.

      Ah well.

  32. Better use by Lt+Razak · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to point and click on a girl walking buy, and having www.XXXgirlnextdoor.com or www.milf.com pop up, showing the nekkid details.

    1. Re:Better use by angrytuna · · Score: 1

      Your honor, I swear I was just looking for the Gap Jeans home page...

      --

      It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork.

  33. phones on ... great by Ian+0x57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just what I need, people turning their phones ON in the theater. The last thing we need is encouragement to bring more phones.

  34. Make it better?! by geekmetal · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Looking even further ahead, Hypertag will use visual recognition, so phone users can point their phone at a magazine or newspaper article and be linked to a Web page, and even sound," said Morgan. "Using sound would allow TV viewers to access related Web pages by pointing and clicking their phone at the television.

    So that we can read painfully from our cell phone screens instead of reading the printed material? Hmm.. Wonder how further they think they will go..

    --
    There are two kinds of egotists: 1) Those who admit it 2) The rest of us
  35. What it'll be used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll be able to point your cell phone at a woman and call up all the online pr0n she appears in.

  36. a shopping aid.... by scottymonkeypants · · Score: 1

    This sounds like an interesting technology, especially in the cd/video store settings.

    Beyond product reviews, it would be nice to have access to sample clips and/or movie trailers. I can just imagine, back when I worked in a record store, the help that this would have been every time some random customer came in looking for the ubiquitous "that one song by that one guy with that line that goes like..." :-)

    Seriously, though, with the widespread adoption of PDAs and cell phones nowadays, this could be a very powerful selling tool in the hands of a retailer savvy enough to make proper use of it.

  37. Not a new concept by Mwongozi · · Score: 2, Informative

    AT&T UK's research division (the same people who took over the VNC project) have been exploring similar ideas within buildings in the Sentient Computing Project.

    1. Re:Not a new concept by jrumney · · Score: 1

      AT&T don't have a UK research division, they closed it last year. I don't know if the employees were allowed to take this project with them (as they were with VNC due to its being released under the GPL), or if AT&T canned it.

  38. I bet retailers will fight tooth and nail... by FatSean · · Score: 5, Funny

    No longer would consumers be fooled by packaging and out-of-context reviews! All the crap merchandise would have to be reduced to their actual value. "Top Gun" will sell for $3 on DVD.

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:I bet retailers will fight tooth and nail... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell is wrong with "Top Gun"?

    2. Re:I bet retailers will fight tooth and nail... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Nothing, except the DVD is expensive, considering it has no commentary, bonus stuff, etc.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:I bet retailers will fight tooth and nail... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      What the hell is wrong with "Top Gun"?</quote>

      Well, for one thing, it won't play in fancy voice-activated dvd players - every time the plane's about to crash, they shout "eject, eject, eject",and the dvd shoots out of the player at 214 mph :-)

      Seriously, a voice-activated dvd player would be about as useless as a point-and-click cell phone. Orsound-activated toilets, so when someone lets go a big wet one, they don't have to be reminded to reach behind to "courtesy flush".

    4. Re:I bet retailers will fight tooth and nail... by ShadowDrake · · Score: 1

      >Orsound-activated toilets, so when someone lets go >a big wet one, they don't have to be reminded to >reach behind to "courtesy flush".

      There are self-flushing toilets. I think they're based on detection of a person arriving or leaving. For some reason, they're installed in a lot of casinos locally.

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  39. More better use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like to be able to point it at CDs and DVDs in stores and with a click have my home computer download them as warez.

    [humor]

  40. Brilliant! by WTFmonkey · · Score: 1

    That's the sequel:

    Finding Nemo 2: Elbow Deep
    or is it
    Fondling Nemo

    1. Re:Brilliant! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goatse Nemo perhaps?

  41. Google The Movie Poster by Zardoz44 · · Score: 1
    Why not make a cell phone with a screen good enough to view a webpage, and then make a half-decent input device. Once you do that, you can actually use google to find information about products. Do you think you're going to get unbiased product reviews from the store trying to sell it?

    Or better yet, a wireless internet connection directly to your brain. Why not just go all the way?

  42. IRID's : Basically smarter RFIDs by GillBates0 · · Score: 1
    These look like smart RFID devices, except that they are IRID devices.

    Yesterday's article on RFIDs talked about how RFID tags would be used to keep track of inventory, etc. People were concerned that they would hurt privacy, as locations of RFID tags could be traced. What the article never talked about yesterday was the infrastructure that would be needed to actually keep track of the individual tags.

    The IRID guys have taken this a step further, by moving out of the Walmart-warehouse like location, and developing servers to track the tags, and beam information to and from the cellphones. With all the emphasis on locating the devices, the same sort of privacy issues that apply to RFIDs would apply here too.

    But the positive point is, that users would actually be able to opt-in for these devices, if they find them desirable, rather than the RFID idea which was more opt-out (subtle reference earlier spam article :).

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
  43. How about a simple upc scanner on a cellphone? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

    Then when you go shopping, you can get Consumer Reports info, or in the grocery store, you can get specific dietary information.

    --
    That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    1. Re:How about a simple upc scanner on a cellphone? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      What kind of an idiot would sit and research every single item hes buying at the supermarket?

      Gawd.. I'd probably kill that asshole who's blocking the aisle while he researches the nutritional differences between Cocoa Puffs and Cocoa Pebbles.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:How about a simple upc scanner on a cellphone? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      Ahh! to be young again!

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
  44. [snide] Fair and Balanced [ /snide] on your phone. by switcha · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

    I'm sure that the rollout of that would never involve the media companies signing on (or walking across the hall) with the phone companies to control that content.

    "This 'Cell-O-Matic' review of this fine MGM movie, brought to you by...MGM"

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  45. hmmm - a better use by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Howzabout I point the thing at a pretty girl, and it reads her RFID tags and tells me what her blog URL is...now *that's* an 'enabling technology'! :)

    1. Re:hmmm - a better use by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      one major flaw with this concept.... Pretty girls don't have blogs.

      Now if you point it at an ugly girl, yeah, you'll probably be linked to her blog.

    2. Re:hmmm - a better use by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just be sure to not accidently point it at the goatse guy.

    3. Re:hmmm - a better use by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      Love them or hate them, any compassionate person would not make fun of ugly girls (or anyone for that matter) for suffering from uglyness. Anyone with an ounce of civility would realize that its just crude. Its not funny whatsoever. Its odd that so many conservatives?, so eager to tell everyone how holier-than-thou they are, are so quick to make jokes about such topics.

      Strangely, I agree with many of your views on your blog. Sadly, I wonder if you really are as undie-bunched as you seem. It must suck to be so uptight.

      You should foe me, quick, so you don't learn.

      That's a good boy.

    4. Re:hmmm - a better use by mtrupe · · Score: 1

      You read my blog and agree? Hmm... Maybe I should un-foe you.

      Yes, I am pretty undie-bunched, on that presumption your are correct.

  46. The real usage by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's hard enough
    to read the current
    text on my cell phone
    that has a screen no
    wider than this mess
    age. I can't imagine
    reading lengthy discuss
    ions of art works and
    paintings on a cell
    phone. I think my thumb
    would break from hitting
    the scroll button const
    antly.

    1. Re:The real usage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You
      have a v
      ery impr
      essive c
      ellphone
      compared
      to mine
      which ca
      n handle
      only eig
      ht chara
      cters on
      a line.

  47. Logistics & Supply Chain Management Apps by HighOrbit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Put one of these on a shipping container, a box, or a pallet and then tie the returned webpage to a back-end database and you could have a killer app for transportation manifests and shipping invoices.

    1. Re:Logistics & Supply Chain Management Apps by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      err...thats what they have now for inventory. Point the scanner at the barcode (doesn't have to be right on top of it), wireless beam to the backroom inventory server.

      ooo...because it's in a cellphone, it has to be new, cool, and never been done before.

    2. Re:Logistics & Supply Chain Management Apps by afidel · · Score: 1

      I think he's talking about instant updates for remote locations like UPS drivers, delivery drivers, etc. Of course there are already solutions for this with things like embeded palms or blackberries, but bringing the costs down to that of a simple cellphone doesn't seem like such a bad idea.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Logistics & Supply Chain Management Apps by nacturation · · Score: 1
      Put one of these on a shipping container, a box, or a pallet and then tie the returned webpage to a back-end database and you could have a killer app for transportation manifests and shipping invoices.

      I'm glad you came up with this idea. You should contact a patent lawyer -- after all, it has never been done before.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Logistics & Supply Chain Management Apps by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

      The difference is a common reader (web-based on cell phone)) as opposed to a proprietery reader (i.e. your scanner might not work with my database backend).

    5. Re:Logistics & Supply Chain Management Apps by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

      Yes, but I don't think you can read FedEx's database with UPS's or DHL's scanner. But with a common reader (web-on-cellphone), you could connect to anybody's backend database anywhere with a single reader.

  48. Real World Hyperlink for Goatse.cx? by jinglecat · · Score: 0

    What would that be?

  49. well, maybe it is not so great by kipsate · · Score: 1

    First of all, near movie theaters you can most often watch trailers playing on the television screens around the theater. But let's pretend I manage to look over that. Then:

    Point & shoot with my mobile to a movie poster near my favourite theater, and pray to be lucky enough that it is one that responds with sending a URL back to my phone? A one-in-a-thousand chance. And I am already getting annoyed when a url in my browser does not work. This will not encourage its use.

    But suppose I get lucky. Download a movie trailer on my 28k8 bps mobile phone which may take 30 minutes even for a low resolution one? I think not.

    Ok, suppose we go this far. But, watch a movie trailer on a 220 x 160 (at most) pixel display? No thank you.

    Now let's say am a person with no life, that got lucky enough to be able to download a trailer. What's that you say? I have to pay $$$ for the mb's I've downloaded? Oh I see, I guess that made me a loser now as well in front of my buddies.

    I am somewhat sceptic. Also for its other uses ($$$).

    (And why use expensive, unreliable infrared transmission? I'd say put RFID-tags into posters etc. instead, no power required and much cheaper. If this is such a good idea, mobile phone makers will be sure to make their phones able to read . But I'm not holding my breath.)

    --
    My karma ran over your dogma
  50. One thing left to do. by aeinome · · Score: 2, Funny

    Get pr0n via strip club adverts.

    --
    When you don't have a leg to stand on, don't even get up.
  51. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by kill-hup · · Score: 1
    this will just encourage Joe to hop on his cell phone and chat with Mary

    Yeah, I hate that Joe. He's really an inconsiderate bastard!

    --
    Sinepaw.org: Grape Winos
  52. Spam escapes from the computer by yintercept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why would they have to charge for this? With this new technology, Spam and popup ads will finally be able to escape from the computers into the community at large where they can really wreak havoc.

    People think billboards are sight pollution, well, we ain't seen nothing yet. Ten years from now, you won't be able to walk down a city street without a bombardment of media messages.

    Just like the Internet, all these media messages will be free!!!!

    1. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by $exyNerdie · · Score: 1


      People think billboards are sight pollution, well, we ain't seen nothing yet. Ten years from now, you won't be able to walk down a city street without a bombardment of media messages.

      I am gonna learn some farming and move to the boonies !!

    2. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Ten years from now, you won't be able to walk down a city street without a bombardment of media messages.

      Hey, I saw that movie! It was pretty good. Tom Cruise is always good, but he was particularly good in that flick. Unfortunately, I found a couple of the scenes to be just slightly unrealistic. And Colin Farrell didn't have enough on-screen time.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    3. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am gonna learn some farming and move to the boonies !!

      Just remember, pop-ups suck worse over dial-up!

    4. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Why would they have to charge for this?

      Because they can.

      And they will.

    5. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      It's already happened. In NYC, where I used to work, they were painting whole buildings with ads. You could see through them from the inside, sort of, although you could tell there was paint on the window. But from the outside, you couldn't really see the building itself so much as a huge billboard. It looked kind of cool when someone opened a window and stuck his/her head out -- there'd be this black square in the ad, with the person in it. Weird.

      But, this is already in progress. Check out 42nd street sometime. It's all lights, neon, and come-ons. Times Square is even worse, but at least there you don't have rabid hookers chasing you yelling "So you think you're too good for me?". Man... No means NO, lady!!!

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    6. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by yintercept · · Score: 1

      In Salt Lake (and other cities I suspect) they paint the entire bus (windows and all) with ads. It makes riding on a bus a really dark, depressing gloomy experience. I would rather walk than ride an ad painted bus. But, there is no inch of human dignity that isn't up for sale.

      But on a positive not, the shear distaste and mass rejection people have for spam, popup ads and telemarketers might spawn a whole sale rejection of the intrusive ad culture. People are ticked and are fighting back.

    7. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      What's really ironic is, I read somewhere that no one who's studied the situation from a sociology or psychology standpoint has ever been able to demonstrate that ads work at all. The article basically said that people who study the situation generally find that the people viewing the ads learn to ignore them fairly quickly. I think the example used was people flipping channels or muting the TV whenever ads come on. Another article (sorry, it was a long time ago and I don't remember where I saw it) said that people don't even SEE print and web ads. They manage to actually not even notice them, it's like background noise the brain filters out.

      About the only ads I've ever really paid attention to were highly targeted, technology-oriented ads placed in an ad section where you could look IF you were looking for a specific thing (think ComputerShopper). Those were what I consider "honorable" ads, because they basically just said, "Ok, so you're looking for a laptop. Here are the models we have, here are our prices." No weirdo bullshit, and hidden in the back of the magazine where they belong, you know?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    8. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by WeblionX · · Score: 0

      Can I use a different viewer for reality, that's not only up to standards but also blocks the popups? Or is reality still a closed format?

      --
      (\(\
      (=_=) Bani!
      (")")
    9. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by yintercept · · Score: 1

      I admit, I've had the false hope that I could use internet ads to pay for content. The truth of the matter is that ads on content sites do not work well. People tune them out. Ads in places where people are looking for information about products do wonders.

      To make ads on content sites work, you either have to gear the ads to selling...or you have to make them extraordinarily annoying.

      So, the idea of ads paying for content is a failure, people no longer pay for content...that leaves the industry with a big question: How do you pay for content?

    10. Re:Spam escapes from the computer by yintercept · · Score: 1

      There is a ton of different viewers for reality and each provide a completely different view of the world and have different: For example, there is the fundamentalists Christian view, the atheist viewer, the pseudo philosophical viewer, the Islamic viewer, the Valley Girl Viewer, the Hindu Viewer, the Urban Youth Viewer, the Buddhist viewer.

      Each viewer has its own blockers and filters. You should try a couple and find what works best.

  53. Your sig (OT) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Regarding your sig "I tried to patent barratry as a business model, but there was too much prior art".

    You have to remember that Amazon couldn't patent the one-stop checkout [too much prior art], but they could patent the one-click checkout on a computer. So... you need to try to think outside the box.

    Like, patenting the one-stop-checkout using the US Mail and Fax, or using a digital cellular phone, or the one-stop-checkout using computers to find victims I mean to umm find customers), or some combination of any of the above.

    Then you'll be able to get your patent, and sue other prior I mean infringing one-click-operations into the dirt.

    I say go for it, if you can ever find something to patent.

  54. Good idea by stud9920 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...because everyone should leave his GSM online when in the cinema.

  55. Nifty idea, but suffers from fatal flaws by ebuck · · Score: 1

    Assuming the technology can be implemented without problems (which it should), I still see tons of launch problems.

    Unless this can be launched in a big way, it won't be very useful. Users with enhanced cell phones / other viewers, will be frustrated with a lack of content to browse, and much content will go unviewd by people lacking compatible browsers. Even if the people have usable browsers, and the content is available, most of the population won't bother to learn how to use it. I mean, how many people are just getting around to setting their VCR/DVD clocks? (Not the slashdot crowd, of course! But they are more than us)

    Plus, how many people are willing to look like a geek in public pointing their cell phone at a poster, while mashing on some "browse" button, because the bottom of the poster states "Hypertag Enabled, Point Here for More Information!"? If this is to succeed, that's what many, many people need to do.

    1. Re:Nifty idea, but suffers from fatal flaws by PSaltyDS · · Score: 1

      Same fatal flaw as every free product info model - business-based info (ads) vice the info wanted by the user. Every form of this idea has the same problem.

      My local newspaper web site has a business pages link, but only pulls up those who are paying to be there, so it is not usefull at all. The local yellow pages are only usefull in this way because almost EVERYBODY is listed. When shopping for anything, I don't wish for access to the vacuuous drivel on the products web site, I wish for instant lookup in Consumer Reports or other independant review. Ask your OnStar system for the nearest Mexican restraunt and it will drive you right passed three of them to take you to the one that paid to be listed in OnStar's system.

      Stupid question of the day: How do you get Slashcode to not put the web site name in square brackets next to a link?

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. - Geek's corollary to Clarke's law
    2. Re:Nifty idea, but suffers from fatal flaws by ebuck · · Score: 1

      I wish I have a vew mod points to throw your way. The comments about your local newspaper's site are quite apt. However...

      I believe the onstar to be a "viable" product, because it produces important information (street directions) which is guranteed to be accessable by someone owning the system. The advertising aware "restruant" feature may not be even-handed, but it is guranteed to be available.

      But if I buy a "enhanced browsing" cell phone, I have no gurantee that it will work with any given poster. I have to first find a "enhanced browsing enabled" poster. So I have a feature which is not guranteed to be available. After pointing this thing to a dozen posters and getting nothing, I will stop trying the feature until I see a poster indicating that it contains this "enhanced feature". Meanwhile many people will see this "enhanced" poster, but not have the cell phone / whatever to access the goods.

      If I buy a new cell phone before I encounter this poster, or even after I encounter only a few of these posters, I will probably decide to get a cheaper model which doesn't provide this "feature" my experience tells me is "almost useless". If others lacking the "enhanced" cell phone fail to get a sense of "missing out" on the experience, they will probably not buy in either. Of course, how do you "miss out" on an experience you have no awareness of? Advertising!

      Products like this need excellent planning at roll-out, or the budgets dry up well before the revenue rolls in.

  56. A use for product reviews??? by HydeMan · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? Why on earth would they provide anything but a glowing review? Do you think the reviews would be independent? Of course not! Besides, only the /. crowd is geek enough to carry a device around to read product reviews, when simply looking at the box could provide the same content. Again, to provide enough content for it to be useful, the manufacturers themselves would have to provide the content.

  57. Reviews by Mikey-San · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As a few funny posts have pointed out, you'll never see reviews for products in the stores, and if you /do/ see them, you aren't going to see the really terrible reviews--accurate, perhaps, but still bad, so their accuracy is irrelevant--in the store next to the aisle where you'll find said reviewed product.

    Not to take the opportunity to take a shot at Microsoft (seriously), but IE does something in the same mindset. Rather, it doesn't do something:

    It doesn't block pop-up windows. Why? Advertising is what would be blocked, and Microsoft wants more people to advocate its browser. If company A has a product that company B is going to hide or recommend you don't touch, company A won't care about company B's method of delivery.

    Capitalism(tm): Pro-consumer all the way!*

    *void in the real world

    --
    Mikey-San
    Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
    1. Re:Reviews by MyHair · · Score: 1
      Capitalism(tm): Pro-consumer all the way!*

      *void in the real world
      I don't think capitalism is the problem here. The problem is that big and/or unscrupulous companies are ganging up on consumers, and consumers aren't pissed off enough yet to hurt them financially. (Then again, maybe we are hurting them and that's why we're in a recession...I know I've drastically cut my spending in the past three years.) In some cases the big companies lobby government for protection, too, but that is also controllable once enough people want to do something about it.
  58. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like a dead chicken

  59. Music recognition service in the UK by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is an interesting system just launched in the UK where you dial a number on your phone, then hold your phone up to the source of the music for thirty seconds. It hangs up, and then messages you back with the name of the song, if it can work it out. This return message then costs you 25p for the trouble.

    It's automated, but gawd knows how it does it. That has to be some seriously clever software doing music detection. Either way, I figured it's yet another 'real world' hyperlink example.

    Unfortunately the name of the service escapes me, although it's advertised regularly on London's KISS FM. Does anyone else here know about this? I believe you can access the service by 'using the numbers down the middle of your phone..' 2580, perhaps? Just goes to show how good radio advertising really is! Ha! :-)

    1. Re:Music recognition service in the UK by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      It's automated...

      How do you know it's automated? For all you know, there's some room of people huddled around a bank of phones each with a computer. You know, the guys who work at the music stores who serve the same function? What do they call those guys?

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    2. Re:Music recognition service in the UK by CoolCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clever?

      No, don't think so, we have the same service here in norway (actually had it for quite some time now), all it does is to compare against playlists in radio stations to get which tracks that are on air when you call them and then compare the recorded 30 seconds from your mobile with one of the songs and send you an quick sms back.. voila!

    3. Re:Music recognition service in the UK by C+A+S+S+I+E+L · · Score: 1
      The service is called Shazam. The dial-up number is indeed 2580 (i.e. the centre column of buttons on the phone). It is automated - CD's are automatically ripped and the audio signatures are put into a humungous database, and some very smart DSP technology matches what the phone hears to what's on the database.

      It does not follow radio playlists - to prove this, just try it against a CD - and it'll sometimes even pick out original recordings that have been sampled in more recent tracks. Shazam has a huge number of CD's on file - I tested it against a track playing in a North African cuisine restaurant here in London. ("Warda" by "Harramt Ahebbak", it says here.)

      Coolest of all, of course, Shazam even has my CD on the database, even though isn't on a major label. (I know they have my CD, because I nagged a friend there to rip it.)

  60. But Will It Work On People? by tds67 · · Score: 0

    This technology will be useful after all people get chip implants.

    Imagine being able to point and click at a woman and get information about her on your mobile device, like age, sexual preferences, medical history, likes/dislikes, etc. Ah, the future looks bright indeed!

  61. The big difference by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 1

    is that this doesn't require a separate piece of equipment.

    I'm sure people saw CueCat as a kind of specialty market, so there was reluctance to invest time or money in it.

    1. Re:The big difference by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

      is that this doesn't require a separate piece of equipment.

      The cue:cat provided the additional piece of equipment free of charge, I don't see how that is any less of a problem than requiring purchase of a specific brand of phone. You maight an argument that the cue:cat wasn't good for use outside the home, but the new cell phone system doesn't sound particularly handy inside the home (though I know use of the sell phone as your home phone is much more common in Europe than in the US.)

      The main problem with both systems is the threat to your privacy, will activating the link be traceable to your cell phone number? The main complaint about Cue:cat wasn't availabity of the scanner (in fact most people considered that its best feature since once they disabled it they had a free scanning wand) the problem was that they wanted you to register it so every use could be tracked back to you (though they claimed it would only be tracked to your demographic data - not your actual personal name & address.)

  62. Why would they? by SiMac · · Score: 1

    You're in Blockbuster, right? Odds are you're going to be renting a video. It doesn't matter to them which video you rent, just that you rent a video, so they'll let the customer rent the good video.

    Anyway, sites like Amazon.com do give you customer reviews, which are relatively unbiased.

    1. Re:Why would they? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Inventory control. If more people click on "MadMax 7", they can devote more space to it. Or get more copies.

      They want to know as much about your buying/renting habits as they can. preferably before you plunk down the money, so they can have whatever it is you want appear before your eyes.

      This, as with most recent things of this type (RFID, cellphone web access, SPAM, popups, etc, etc), is good for them. Not necessarily good for us.

  63. Easier ways to have similar fun by TrollBridge · · Score: 0
    That reminds me of my last trip to Borders, where I found a large and rather graphic pictoral sex guide in a very public area. As a good citizen, I felt a better place for such explicit material would be in the children's section, next to the Harry Potter display.

    I'm going to hell, aren't I...

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
    1. Re:Easier ways to have similar fun by afidel · · Score: 1

      Yes you are, and I'll be right beside you laughing hysterically =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Easier ways to have similar fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, then you must be a large and rather graphic sex guide.

  64. Patent by WiggyWack · · Score: 1

    Quick, somebody patent it!

    --
    Macintosh humor! MacComedy.com
  65. Incitment for cell-spam by TheVampire · · Score: 1

    I can see it now. As soon as you point and select something, your cell # is saved to a database, and you start getting deluged with cell-spam for various items, i.e. " If you liked *movie name here* we're sure you'd like to rent these other fine movies at Blockbuster(tm)!" ad naseum... ( no pun intended )

  66. Sort of repeat... by netsharc · · Score: 1

    of this article.

    They change the words and no one catches it..

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Sort of repeat... by Adam+Schumacher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that it is a different product with different technologies made by a different company with different functions.

      The system in the article you reference is based on the location of the phone, whereas the system in this article is based on the location of the tag.

      Amazing what you can learn from reading the article, eh?

    2. Re:Sort of repeat... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of the differences, that's why I said "sort of".

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  67. If there was a /. poster... by yelohbird · · Score: 1

    would everyone rush to point-and-zap at it?
    And would subscribers get to zap it before the rest of us do?

    --
    h-t-t-p-colon-slash-slash-slash-dot-dot-org
  68. Sounds like Digimarc's mediabridge by mchinand · · Score: 1

    In addition to Cuecats, this also seems similar to Digimarc's Mediabridge
    in which you point a webcam at an ad in a magazine (they put a special symbol on the ads that work) and the software redirects your browser to the company's website.

  69. Troll links by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    (insert reference to ascii goatse image on phone screen here)

    [rimshot]

  70. Screw product reviews.. Easy-Remote-TiVo'ing! by jkeegan · · Score: 1

    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.
    Bah! Here's an application for it.. You point it at the movie poster, it calls home, and has your TiVo schedule a Wishlist for the movie for when it finally comes out on HBO/Cinemax/Showtime/etc.

    (Or using the video store example, you point it at a cassette and it does the same thing.. That way you schedule a whole bunch of movies you [I]also[/I] want to see, but you still rent the one you're in the store to get that night.)

    Then again, what TiVo owner is in a video rental store?

    p.s. This is all easy to do already, except the real-world hyperlink devices part.
    --

    ..Jeff Keegan
    seven syllables explain TiVo: kee gan dot org slash ti vo
  71. Yes indeed.. by Beautyon · · Score: 1

    get product reviews

    Forget product reviews, comparing prices are the application.

    [shopkeeper]
    So, I am going to let you into my store with your mobile, so that you can check to see if my prices are lower two doors away...

    Riiiiiiight.
    [/shopkeeper]

    --
    ATH0 Bitcoin: 1DnwFLXczVZV8kLJbMYoheUrpqHesjxrSi
  72. Wouldn't this be a single geeks dream come true? by linuxrunner · · Score: 3, Funny

    Walk down the street and point and click at every attractive woman you meet...

    click > Married
    click > Single but attached
    click > Looking for an orgy with the next man that asks

    Now we know what was on the mind of the guy who created this....

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
  73. Just imagine- by Mu*puppy · · Score: 1
    something like this in your own home. I mean, you could have something hooked up to your computer, where all you would need to do is swipe a reader over a product bar-code, and pull up a webpage for more information about that product. Wouldn't that be neat?? After all, everyone wants even more marketing hype than they're already exposed to, right?

    Hell, you could shape it like some animal so it'd look cute next to your mouse; say... a cat.

    Hey, wait a minute......

    --
    There's no wrong way, to eat a Rhesus...
  74. RIAA response: by psxndc · · Score: 1
    I'm sorry. Putting shit on a CD amongst other decent singles you hear on the radio is a copyright protection device. Using your cellphone to find out about it before you buy is a violation of the DMCA and it will destroy the music industry. We'll be lobbying congress to punish all consume^H^H^H^H^H^H thieves and we'll see you in court

    Sincerely,
    Hillary Rosen

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

  75. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by Rai · · Score: 1

    Wasn't cancer cured years ago, but the treatment is more profitable so nobody knows about it?

    No wait, Medicine Man flashback...nevermind.

  76. Automated Google Stalking! by MongooseCN · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Can you point it at a cute girl on the street and have her name automatically searched for in Google? Instant digital stalking!

  77. Encouraging cellphones in movie theaters? by kaltkalt · · Score: 1

    Damn them all to hell.

    "Hey let's go to the movies!"
    "Good idea, don't forget your cellphone!"

    Remember, only 5% of the population is capable of turning their cellphone sounds/ringers off. Encouraging people to bring cellphones into movie theaters, museums, etc., is about the dumbest idea I've ever heard. But it might sell a product, so there's no stopping it.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.
    1. Re:Encouraging cellphones in movie theaters? by Diotallevi · · Score: 1

      I love my cell phone...i get to talk to my job 24 hours a day...oh goody why not ruin everone elses good time while i am suffering

      --
      Never underestimate the logical power of sarcasm
  78. ::Real ::World ::Hyperlinks by Speare · · Score: 1
    This sounds familiar . Where have I heard these claims before ?

    (Pardon if any of these links are going stale.)

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  79. Punch the Monkey by HopeUnknown · · Score: 1

    No, but at the zoo you'll now be able to punch the monkeys and win a prize!

  80. But can it do this? by Lane.exe · · Score: 0, Troll
    Can I point it at random women and have it bring up their amateur webcam pages? And if so, do I still have to use paypal?

    --
    IAALS.
  81. Pop ups by JeepingNET · · Score: 1

    I see the future now... Walking down the street and people beaming popups at me.. This is interesting technology but just think about it.. if not isn't controlled well it could get quite dirty.. Everytime you walk past a store you cell would be going to that companies website. That being said I'm sure you'd have the ability to allow and disallow this feature.. right..

  82. CD Stores? by nycsubway · · Score: 1

    They're record stores, Taco....

    Records....

  83. Sounds like HP's CoolTown to Me. by jakesher · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Sounds like HP's CoolTown to Me. by Shirotae · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does look rather like one of the things you get with HP's CoolTown. Anyone who wants to play with it can download some of the CoolTown stuff. If you just want to speculate about what you could do with it, then HP has lots of papers to give you some ideas too.

  84. Hmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I point the phone at CmdrTaco, will it link me directly to his website (www.goatse.cx) ?

  85. Hyperlinks blah by hackstraw · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when there are realworld symbolic links!

  86. Ah, the pr0n potential is endless by Fux+the+Pengiun · · Score: 1

    I'd only be interested if you could point the thing at a hot chick, and it would show you the nudie pics her last boyfriend took of her and then posted on the internet when they broke up.

    --
    Consensual sex is boring.
  87. An actually useful location-based service by higgins · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you're using a computer at CMU (or one of Telerama's wireless hotspots in Pittsburgh), you can find out when the next bus comes near you at bus.maya.com. Perhaps it's not as glamorous as streaming Quicktime movies to your phone, but it's probably more useful ;-) That said, I hope someone solves the location-based services infrastructure problem. The bus hack depends on mapping IP addresses to lat/lons, which is incredibly brittle and evil.

  88. CD's and videos by rodentia · · Score: 1

    I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews.

    You mean to say yer buying movies and music these days, Taco? Shame on you!

    --
    illegitimii non ingravare
  89. Commercials on my Cell Phone. by LoneStarGeek · · Score: 1

    Great now I can get commercials for movies on my cell phone. Isn't TV commercials and previews of other movies taking up 10 minutes of you time when you pay to see another movie enough. The day I can point and Click my cell phone at a Ferrari, BMW, Corvette or any Hot Blonde Woman and receive an instant test drive then I will be impressed. For know I guess I'll use it for it's intended purpose as a phone.

  90. For the humor impaired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See, what made it funny (note the moderation) is that you don't GO to the rental place anymore, you just use P2P to download it! Ha! Get it?

    1. Re:For the humor impaired... by notque · · Score: 1

      See, what made it funny (note the moderation) is that you don't GO to the rental place anymore, you just use P2P to download it! Ha! Get it?

      Oh! Cause we are all software pirates! Pirates are funny cause they say, "Arrrgggg!"

      Hahaha, I like pirates. Thank you.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    2. Re:For the humor impaired... by Seek_1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, pirates say "AARRRR!!!".

      Garfield and Charlie Brown say "Arrgggg!"

      (yeah, slow day at work...)

    3. Re:For the humor impaired... by hatrisc · · Score: 1

      hear about that new pirate movie coming out???


      I hear it's rated Aaaarrrrrrr.

      That's it for me, good night!

      --
      I write code.
    4. Re:For the humor impaired... by notque · · Score: 1

      Garfield and Charlie Brown say "Arrgggg!"

      Garfield sleeps, so I will discount your post as an obvious attempt to troll, and discredit me.

      ARRRRRRRRRRRRHHHHHHHHHHH

      (real slow day at work...)

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    5. Re:For the humor impaired... by cvas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Another...

      A pirate walked into a bar with a steering wheel in his crotch.
      The bartender said "Do you know you have a steering wheel in your crotch?"
      The pirate responded,"Arr, it's drivin me nuts!"

      Don't forget to tip your waitress.

    6. Re:For the humor impaired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hear about the new pirate movie, "Coming"?

      I hear it's rated Aaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrr!

    7. Re:For the humor impaired... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, it's the way it was stated first. also, which star wars character is also a pirate? AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRR 2-d2

  91. Great. On a 1.5" screen. by weston · · Score: 1

    The real world hyperlink is great, but they still have to work on presentation for the web. I've yet to find more than a handful of sites usable on my phone, and even fewer that have worthwhile content in that category.

    Meanwhile, we still have creative directors and PHBs who insist on designing non-liquid websites for IE6 at at least 800px width.

  92. You believe reviews? by BelugaParty · · Score: 2, Informative

    "I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews"

    I don't understand. Most reviews on any website attached to such a service would be biased. Places like Amazon, its hard to get credible reviews since you don't know the history of the reviewer or have any idea what their motivation is for writing there. The reviewer could be a corporate shmo who's writing the review from an internal memo, never having seen/heard the movie/CD. They could be an incredibly articulate and pursuasive 9 year old with 9 year old taste. Or it could be HAL9000 (though some people here might like its taste).

    I think music/movie reviews are worthless. Thumbs up or thumbs down are just as useless. The best way to discover a new movie or CD is to meet a person, get to know them, and find out what they like; try watching the movies they like, and try listening to the music they like. Why don't you go to shows?
    You'll be happier. Have a friend. And a reference point for what you are going to fill your ears/eyes with.

  93. we need to stepback for a second by Alric · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For a bunch geeks, a bunch of people hear such do seem to be hating a potentially cool new technology.

    Sure, maybe these things would hijack your cell-phone, and then the world would end. Somehow I doubt it.

    I think the power would be more in the hands of the consumers. The article talks about infrared communication, not radio frequencies. This means that you would have to establish a direct line of sight link. If I have to point the IR port on my phone at something, I have a great amount of control over that.

    I think a potential area of trouble is who gets to control what links get displayed. But I could see myself walking into a Barnes&Noble and browsing some books. One looks interesting; so I scan the "WebCode" or whatever with my phone. A couple links pop up on my screen, one to the reviews section of B&N.com for the book and one to the publisher.

    Maybe I'm being too trusting, but this idea sounds pretty cool to me.

    1. Re:we need to stepback for a second by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 1
      For a bunch geeks, a bunch of people hear such do seem to be hating a potentially cool new technology.
      Come on, can you blame them? The way business is run these days, people are leery of anything to do with advertising. You should take warning when the technically sophisticated are concerned about a technology.

      It's almost axiomatic now: if someone develops a new somethingorother "to make peoples' lives easier," some company (or more likely, scads and scads of them) will find a way to abuse it. Spam and pop-ups plague our email and browsing experiences. The new technology will come, and shortly after that will come the matching exploit (because hacks are supposed to be illegal).

      The technology is intended to provide information, yes, but there are two possible methods of abuse:
      1. Undesired information could be given to the user (nuisance), or
      2. Unintended information could be obtained from the user (violation of privacy).

      In the case of 1, there's always pop-up, incessant, or just plain annoying ads. And depending on how standardized the phone system is, much worse. Imagine pointing your phone at a link and discovering that you've just downloaded a virus. Oopsie! Admittedly, it depends on how secure your phone is, but if it involves getting information to your phone, someone will come up with what they think is a way to make money by sending you information that they don't care that you don't want.

      In the case of 2, the information has to get to you somehow. What if someone comes up with an exploit which downloads your phone book? Uses your phone number to look up all sorts of personal information on you? Tracks your movements?

      Continuing in that binary vein, remember that there are two conditions under which people fear technology:
      1. They don't understand it, or
      2. They understand it, and are worried that there are a lot of people who will misuse it.

      Most of those /.ers who fear this newish technology understand hyperlinks, wireless communications, and so forth. They fear it solely for that second reason. And it doesn't have to be about the world ending. It just has to do with getting really annoyed with someone who's using your cell phone in unexpected ways.

      --
      You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
    2. Re:we need to stepback for a second by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "One looks interesting; so I scan the "WebCode" or whatever with my phone. A couple links pop up on my screen, one to the reviews section of B&N.com for the book and one to the publisher."

      You are being too trusting. What would happen is that the only reviews you would see are the favorable ones because that would be more likely to make you buy the book right then and there. This would be much cooler if you could point it to whatever review site you chose and it got its reviews from there.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  94. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

    Will this hinder museums from adding both visual and audio cues to their exhibits?

    Unfortunately, most people never go to a museum anyway, so I can't imagine anyone wanting to spend an extraordinary amount of money updating a museum that only a very few enlightened souls will see.

    I personally think that cell phones should be banned in public places such as museums and this will just encourage Joe to hop on his cell phone and chat with Mary while I am trying to enjoy some peace and quiet.

    Who said you had a right to peace and quiet? Are you trying to take away Joe's right to talk to Mary? Are you trying to take away Mary's right to hear Joe's description of the sculptures and paintings, since Mary's at home taking care of the kids?

    Generally, public places are pretty big. If Joe is bothering you that much, you can most likely go somewhere you can't hear him, and enjoy the peace and quiet... or, if you're the kind that thinks everyone else should respect your rights, and not the other way around, you could ask (or tell) Joe to go somewhere else while he talks to Mary. Either way, in the end both parties get what they want, and everyone is generally happy.

    I saw some really interesting usages of computers in museums...

    Ironically, I think computers are the primary reason museums aren't popular (if they ever were) anymore. With computers comes The Internet. People can look at their favorite works of art on the internet (as you have ironically demonstrated) rather than expend the time and energy it takes to visit them in person (especially since you can't touch a lot of the higher-end pieces). Of course, I wouldn't mind seeing some cutting-edge 3-D holographic pictures in a museum either...

    --
    "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
  95. Not today, but tomorrow? by nicodemus05 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Not so useful on a cellphone, maybe. But what about the cell phones of tomorrow, the cell phones that double as PDAs and house keys and credit cards? The technology might not be practical now, but it will be. Just as flat screen monitors and laptops are outselling CRTs and desktops, someday PDA/cell combos will rule the market.

    How about pointing your cell phone at a gallon of milk in a grocery store and having it check against the items in your refrigerator to see whether you need more? Better yet, instead of cell phones, what about a device integrated into your clothing? It's very sci-fi, I realize, but isn't that where we're going?

    I guess what I'm saying is that even though this seems silly to us now that doesn't mean it won't become very practical with the advent of more technologies. Sci-fi isn't all impractical, it's a view of a future that may be achievable. Don't knock it.

    --
    while (!sleep){

    sheep++;

    }

  96. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by notque · · Score: 1

    I agree entirely. I think cell phone conversations should be banned in public places such as museums. I don't care much for the cell phone being there or not, I just don't want to have to listen to someone talk.

    Regardless, I wouldn't want this for a museum anyway. I don't want to have any insight, aside from maybe a bit of conversation from friends, regarding art.

    I gain my own opinions, connotations, and feeling regarding art without anyone force feeding how I should feel. I honestly don't quite get an explination next to a piece either, I'd rather just explore what I think/feel about it myself, although understand others may be different.

    Pointing your cellphone to a picture, and getting an idea of what you should have gotten from it kind of defeats the purpose in my opinion.

    --
    http://use.perl.org
  97. Isn't this similar to an 'evil' plan by the MPAA? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Wasn't there an idea that would embed tech like this in video cameras and the like to prevent people from illictly taping movies at the theater? Although the application as it stands, sounds pritty nifty, it seems that it will be used to enforce IP and copyright laws.

    "Video taping/photographing of this image is unauthorized. Please point your camera away from the image. Shutdown begins in 15 seconds."

    I posted something about this a long time ago, but I can't find it, even though...
    OT: I subscribed today and there is a mystical, magical world in here! I just watched a dupe disappear! It's almost like somebody *read the article*!! ;)

  98. /. grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While there are many practical uses for this technology, like in museums as the article suggests.

    Yes.....? I'm still waiting for the rest of that sentence.

  99. Re:Wouldn't this be a single geeks dream come true by MyHair · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on. Like women are going to advertise this. They'll all say "looking for a platonic life partner who also has Herpes" just to keep guys like us away.

  100. smartly transferring your economic power by watchthewatchers · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'll get to how this ties into the thread shortly... but: We vote on elections that have very little choice. But every day, we vote with our dollars, transferring our economic power to the company that makes/sells the product/service. Boycotts are a way to vote with your $, but here's a much more effective way to do it subtley and daily: Every store (grocery, clothes, car), can have a bar-code (or RFID, or infrared) tag on each item, (or MUCH better for our privacy, can have this tag on the SHELF that contains the item so we don't take it home). And it'd be great if we can point a cell/pda/hand-held device at the shelf, and pull up info on the product. We could each put this product ID into the lookup field on whatever info-providers' websites/db's that are in-line with our values. I.e...Some may choose to find out what the Sierra Club thinks about the product, others may care if the product uses child labor, gives money for or against political causes, etc... This is kind of like a hugely expanded product label explaining contents, etc, but is not limited to what the company wants you to know, but what other data is really out there that you care about. You wouldn't read the label every time you purchase something, but as you are constantly tweaking your purchasing habits, you switch to spending money on feeding businesses in line with your values just like you would tweak your habits to shift towards low-fat or other choices. It's been years that I've been thinking this would be a good idea, and since I don't have the money to patent it and lock out others, I'm putting this idea "open source" on slashdot so any greedy co-opter doesn't lock people out from doing this right. your thoughts?

  101. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by gz718 · · Score: 1

    Most museums I've been to prohibit the use of cell phones and if you get a call a guard will immediately walk up to you and tell you to hang up. So this really wouldn't be a problem.

  102. Meta-comment re: I don't know about you. by DeadVulcan · · Score: 1

    But when I leave the computer I don't really wanna take it with me. etc.

    This bugs me. If this technology doesn't interest you, why post in a discussion about it?

    I mean, leading a balanced life is good, obviously. Of course, it's insightful. Maybe it's even "news for nerds," at least those nerds who have no life outside their nerd-life.

    But I propose we avoid this kind of comment - it could be posted on almost every news story that comes up on Slashdot. It amounts to little more than "I hate this because I'm more than just a nerd!" Which only invites someone else to retort, "just because you hate it shouldn't mean I can't use it!" And that's a very, very, tired discussion.

    Yes, it's "Insightful," but I almost feel that "Redundant" is more appropriate.

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  103. Targeted Spam by jbottero · · Score: 0

    Of course this is just targeted advertising all wrapped up with a bow, disguised as a new consumer tool, a technological jump! Next up: targeted phone spam, you walk by Burger King and your cell rings and offers a coupon...

  104. cell phones in Korea??? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    My memory may be fuzzy, but I thought I heard of cellphone app that vibrates a pager if you have matching search profiles with cell phone holders within a certain distance. I also heard of a pager toy in Japan that does this too. (What happen to "good old" flirting?)

    1. Re:cell phones in Korea??? by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
      I thought I heard of cellphone app that vibrates a pager if you have matching search profiles with cell phone holders within a certain distance

      While as an examiner, I reviewed a patent application on a similar idea. As I recall, there was a fair amount of prior art on the subject. It probably never issued as a patent.

      Another examiner I knew issued this: Shapira - Introduction system for locating compatible persons. In trying to find that patent, I just ran across this which is kindof funny: Wertheim - Method for requesting a date with a driver of a vehicle spotted, via the license plate number of the vehicle.

    2. Re:cell phones in Korea??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      While as an examiner, I reviewed a patent application on a similar idea. As I recall, there was a fair amount of prior art on the subject.

      News Flash! Patent Examiner Finds Prior Art!
      This should have been on /. the next day.

  105. Teleporting by Leffe · · Score: 1

    This will be more interesting in the future when we all have mobile teleporters:
    Just click an image of [insert name of somewhere here] in your travel agency and you are there!
    Warning: Do not click something that might contain a hidden goatse link! I would not even want to think of where you would end up. Stops thinking... there that's better, what did I just say?

    Considering that we do not have teleporting just yet, this technology is still impressive. The police could use something like this, just point it at someone and it will bring up all his/her info.(Well... it would have to identify the person first... more non-existant technology... why am I not in the future yet? Can't I just go into a 19-year coma?)
    Or maybe this: Point at computer and click! Power up! :D

  106. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

    *Note: Requires $10 activation fee, you must upgrade to the $59.99/month package, and you will be charged $0.39/minute for every minute you go over your already worthless amount of daytime minutes.

    Spoken very quickly, so that no human can understand it, even the salesperson. And especially not you, the customer.

  107. One step further.. by Cassanova · · Score: 1

    Id like to be able point-click at the poster and instantly buy tickets to the show at the nearest theatre to where I am, or give me the option of choosing which theatre I would like to view it at if I choose to do so.

  108. I remember something Similar to this by Ugot2BkidNme · · Score: 1

    There Was a Company that was sending out free webcams so that users could hold up magazines advertisements to the camera and it woudl navigate the user to the website of that paticular product.

  109. Dup by GiMP · · Score: 1

    This article has been brought to you by duplicate

    1. Re:Dup by localghost · · Score: 1

      The old article is about a similar technology, but developed by a different company, and being used in Japan. You'll notice the one developed in the UK is inferior to the one developed in New Zealand, as the UK one does not have real world Doom. After all, that's the only thing anyone really cares about.

    2. Re:Dup by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Actually, the on in the UK too has 'laser tag' working with it.

  110. hm. by sekzscripting · · Score: 1

    I think it would be a lot more appealing to actually touch these 'real world hyperlinks' with my finger and have them appear on my pda/phone. It's almost like clicking (wink). I guess I/we have to wait til radio chips get small enough (and batteries too) to fit in your pointer. Or, well, I guess you could wear some kind of special glove - but that kills the whole "point".

  111. Potential Use: Bookmark Reality by ruhk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't want to read webpages or anything on my celphone. I don't even CARRY a cell phone. I do carry a PDA though. If I could point my PDA at one of these little tags, and have it capture the URL to a Mozilla bookmarked-tabs list that I could then pull up in mozilla when I get home, I'd be plenty chuffed. If something caught my eye through the day, I could just bookmark it and check it out later when its more convenient.

    --



    404 Error: .sig not found.
  112. recap of Minority report by peter303 · · Score: 1

    For those who didnt see or forgot, Minority report exploited two inventions: (1) "e-ink" or "paper-ink", i.e. video on just about any surface- walls , cereal boxes, newspapers, etc. (2) biometric ID, mainly IRIS, to detect who was walking by and tailor a message for them. These have great potential for 24/7 spam just about everywhere.

  113. Cue JACK by dbombarc · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of the Cue JACK scanner. You can scan barcodes of food products with this, but instead of returning price info to you, it looks up who he manufacturer is and tells you about their shadey side. Shadey side being environmental problems they caused, if they use sweat shops, how they treat animals, etc, etc. Corporate crime stuff.

    --
    we're just marketing. marketing our bad attitudes.
  114. CueCat still kicking.....sort of..... by Creedo · · Score: 1

    The funny thing is, they still think that their idea is going to fly. To quote their site(here):
    The dream was to connect items in the physical world to the Internet, automatically. In January that dream hit a bump in the road and the servers were taken offline. They will scan again...
    I can't wait...

    --
    All that is necessary for the triumph of good is that evil men do nothing.
  115. now, now... by ed.han · · Score: 1

    hey, this is slashdot: shouldn't that be "yeah, i ahte that joe. he's really an insensitive clod!"?

    ed

  116. "Headmap" project by malex23 · · Score: 1
    There's a pretty intesting set of essays about location aware devices and the possibility of publically "tagging" realworld spaces.

    Perhaps it's a little starry-eyed for the Slashdot set, but check it out: www.headmap.com

  117. expandable/collapsable screens are coming by peter303 · · Score: 1

    There are lab prototypes of "flexible" computer screens, e.g. e-ink, organic LCDs, etc., that could rolled up into a pencil-size tube or folded into a pocket. "Mission to Mars" movie and "Earth Final Conflict" TV show used these.

  118. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  119. retina video by peter303 · · Score: 1

    There are prototypes of eyeglasses with a lightpen laser scanner that draws images directly on your retina. This could display large images with a tiny device.

    1. Re:retina video by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      Enough of this and you'll be saying such Gems as:
      'Fuck you, asshole'
      and
      'All be baack'

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    2. Re:retina video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, if you really want to be a f***ing gargoyle.

  120. What I'm looking for .... by DogIsMyCoprocessor · · Score: 1

    is a device that will allow me to point and click at mobile phone users and make them disappear.

    --

    "And this is my boy, Sherman. Speak, Sherman." "Hello." "Good boy."

  121. Pride by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't let the pride and stubbornness of man separate you from God's love for eternity. You are just a small mind trying to understand the universe.

  122. pop up videos by August_zero · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for Phone Pop-ups!

    You walk close to a poster, and your phone suddenly starts ringing, you check it and you see that it has accesed a website with lots of animated GIFs, an annoying MIDI song, and an add for Orbitz promising low airfare anywhere!

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  123. They WILL charge for it by zapp · · Score: 1

    For the same reason they charge you to talk on the local phone network, or to check your free hotmail account on your web-enabled phone, or .

    The content will remain free (and probably even bring revenue, you're right), but the service used to access that content will still cost an arm and a leg.

    --
    no comment
  124. product reviews by Animaether · · Score: 1

    How quickly we forget - this is already easily done through Amazon's programs :

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/06/26/0017 25 7&mode=nested&tid=185

    Not quite point and (one-)click yet, but with a little OCR recognizing the ISBN (so you don't have to tap it in), it could be done that way.

    1. Re:Product Reviews by aflat362 · · Score: 1
      Good call. At first I thought it might be cool to get product reviews in the store - but after reading your post it is obvious that this technology is not the best way to get product reviews.

      Regular old wireless internet would be the way to go here so you could just google your product. No need for Best Buy to hand pick reviews for me - it would be like the waitress at the greasy spoon:

      What's good here?

      "Everything. What'll it be?"

      --

      Conserve Oil, Recycle, Boycott Walmart

  125. Nostalgia by Asprin · · Score: 1


    Dumb-ass pointless crap like this makes me long for the early days of the Internet, when sites like The Hampsterdance were still worth visiting.



    (sigh)

    Oh, well... at least we still have StrongBad.

    --
    "Lawyers are for sucks."
    - Doug McKenzie
  126. It'd be cool if it uses google by dfay · · Score: 1

    I think this idea could work, but only if the back end was a Google search, or something equally arbitrary and unbiased. After all, no one wants to trust the person trying to sell you something to give you unbiased information. Why would you trust them just because "ooh, it's on my cell phone!"?

    Anyway, as is quite often the case these days, the difference between something truly cool and something we all mock and disparage comes down to the words "tied in", "proprietary", and "content control". How long until the corporations making these decisions realize that, with just a little less greed, they can reap fantastic financial rewards. (Greed meaning $$, but also tight control and lock out.)

  127. Is it just me... by Xformer · · Score: 1

    ...or does this sound a lot like WideRay? Hypertag is aimed (no pun intended) at a broader range of devices, though, which is very nice.

    --
    All I want is a kind word, a warm bed and unlimited power.
  128. Experience Music Project by utahjazz · · Score: 1

    They have this at the EMP in Seattle. When you go in, they give you a handheld gizmo with headphones. You point the gizmo at special 'link' icons that are all over the museum, near exhibit items. When you 'click' on a link you get info about the item, or hear the associated band/instrument playing.

    Mine went nuts and got stuck in perma-click mode. Everything I walked by started talking to me or playing something for me, until I went back to the base and got a new one. There's several links within range at any given moment, it was 'changing channel' every time I turned or moved at all.

  129. Googling by phone by indros13 · · Score: 1
    While I doubt the implementation will be quite as open as the WWW, I have to admit that this sounds really cool. The advantage of the internet (particularly, Google) is the ability to instantly gather more information or context about a given thing.

    I can think of plenty of times while shopping for things like stereo equipment or household cleaners where I wanted more context and had to make a return trip to the store after I learned more (i.e. what's the best quality receiver for the price point or does this toilet bowl cleaner have the bonus of deforming frogs and small children once it gets flushed into the watershed.)

    If could have Googled the item while at the store by just pointing my cell phone, I could have saved a lot of time and made a more informed purchase.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  130. Smacks of desperation for any use of camera phone by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have been struck by recent commercials at how incredibly lame the examples phone companies give for using a camera/picture phone. This effort just continues in that tradition with another use for camera phones that possibly three people on earth might use.

    The funny thing is, right next to those movie posters are probably papers offering a much cheaper way to get at reviews!!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  131. Old News, Ever been to Finland? by bobjohnson · · Score: 1

    Nokia is so embedded there, that they pay for everything with their phone, subway, etc. They can even pay their rent with their phone. The US is so far behind with cell phone technology it isn't even funny. I mean really, we're still paying for incoming calls? What kind of crap is that?!?!?!?!

  132. signature by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    The Google translation of your sig into English is: "The scents of the breathing of my cat have taste of the food for cats."

    I guess you're saying, "My cat's breath smells like cat food." Should this really come as a surprise?

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
    1. Re:signature by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > My cat's breath smells like cat food." Should this really come as a surprise?

      No, but if you're confused, it's a Simpsons quote.

  133. Experience Music Project... by zeno_2 · · Score: 1

    They have something like this new at the EMP in seattle. When you go get a ticket, they give you a PDA with a wand of some sort. You point it at one of the exhibits and it gives you info about it on the pda. Just dont go there on the weekends you'll be sitting in line all day long..

  134. cutting edge or not? by LuxFX · · Score: 1

    well the wireless part is pretty good, but the actual process has been in use for a while. for many years now at Walmart, you could take a video tape (then DVD) or a CD to a barcode scanner and get a sample of the video/music. This is the same thing....

    .

    --
    Punctanym: alternate spelling of words using punctuation or numerals in place of some or all of its letters; see 'leet'
  135. Uh... by El · · Score: 1

    ...what percentage of the mobile phones out there have InfraRed ports? None of mine have ever had this feature! Yes, there's a chance that some of them might have bluetooth, but I don't think that has significant market penetration yet either.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  136. Re: I'd like to use it ... to get product reviews by pardonne · · Score: 1

    The only thing you will get is pushy marketing, advertisements, and critical reviews by Joel Siegel (spelling ?).

    Pardonne

  137. Make it worth my while by Go+Aptran · · Score: 1
    I think we should force advertisers to compensate us for our time.

    If clicking on a link to an advert added another 10 minutes of talk time to my phone, it might be worth it.

    --

    "Under the spreading chestnut tree, I sold you and you sold me."

  138. point and shoot by sewagemaster · · Score: 1


    can i point my antenna at any chick on the street and see naked pictures of her?

  139. So don't stop. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Its beyond annoying when you have to stop because someone in your group has to check the gps corodanites for the place you are at.

    So don't stop. They can get 'em on the fly - and they'll be good enough to get back within eyeshot.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  140. Well we know who will exploit this first by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Funny
    Adult stores.

    Simply passing by a pr0n shop on the street will set off your cell phone and flood it with text message ads.

    Walk by a topless dance club and you get instant animated ads.

    Browse in the local magazine shop and a text message ad directs you to the "back room".

    Man am I glad I do not carry a cell phone...

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  141. Better yet - movie rental AVAILABILITY by simetra · · Score: 1

    It would be very nice to see if the local video place had Battlefield Earth or whatever available on DVD or VHS from your car. So, if whatever you want isn't there, you don't have to park, walk in, search for it, and walk out again.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
  142. you're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For pete's sake, go look at some porn or something. Some geeks can meet women the old-fashioned way. We talk to them.

  143. Experience Music Project has this by Montag2k · · Score: 1

    I went to the Expenience Music Project in Seattle about 3 years ago, and they had a similar system.

    They rigged you up with a little PocketPC-type computer and a set of headphones. As you walked through the music exhibits (there was some pretty cool stuff), you could point the PocketPC thing at "icons" that were next to the exhibits. A short write-up would come on the screen you were carrying, and you could listen to audio commentary or music that was based on the exhibit. It was some pretty cool stuff for 2000.

    Of course, it wasn't networked at the time. They had you carry around a little case that the PocketPC was attached to. I think the case had a PC with a DVD drive in it or something like that, but it was still a cool demonstration of this type of tech.

    Disclaimer: the EMP is very Microsoft-oriented, since it was founded by one of the MS guys (can't remember who it was). It was still a pretty cool place to visit in Seattle.

  144. Interesting.... by myusername · · Score: 1
    Could you then go put a tag on a person's home that you don't like, and have it point to a website that is all about how big of a jerk he is?

    Not that I would want to do that, but I have heard of people getting their hands on those stickers that sets the alarms off in retail stores, and sticking them to the back of people browsing around so that when they walk out the exit it looks like they stole something.

    --
    Here a Sig There a Sig Everywhere a Sig Sig...
  145. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, museums and galleries are NEVER the first users of some new tech. It's sex, sex, sex.

    Aim your phone at a sexy ad and see that hot model move on your screen, holding the product strategically between her... Um...

    It'll take 6 hours to read a Victoria's Secret catalog. A full day for Playboy.

  146. Already something like that. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    I understand that there's already a dating service (in Japan?) that is somewhat similar:

    - The subscribers fill out typical dating-service questionaires, and supply their cellphone numbers.
    - The service tracks their cellphone locations.
    - When two people with a sufficiently high compatability score are within a short distance of each other, BOTH their cellphones ring.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  147. Digital Convergence's other IP... by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Whatever happened with their "audio ::Cue::Cat" that you connected your TV to your soundcard? Too much like popup ads?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  148. I won't be impressed by CausticWindow · · Score: 1

    till they come up with some real life instant meta redirect tags.

    Or maybe real life div's.. drool.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  149. Re:CueCat with cell phones by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but this time it is with Cell Phones!!!!!!

    Some of the biggest bashing on CueCat was that it was connected to your computer, take away that and it could be a good idea.

    I think this has some promise.

  150. Product Reviews by trp0 · · Score: 1


    "I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews."

    Great, now I can point my phone at a CD and get the same craptacular industry reviews that we get in newspapers, magazines, and tv already for cds, movies, and books that cover up how shitty the cd, movie, or book actually is. You know the ones I'm talkin' about: "This is the best [cd/movie/book] of the year!" or "A tour de force! Simply a great [cd/movie/book]!" or "This summer's hottest [cd/movie/book]!".

    Except that now, there will be some additional options after the quote-whore's quote: "Press one to [listen to/read] a sample of this [cd/movie/book]." or "If you do not feel like buying this [cd/movie/book] press two to administer a small electric shock to stimulate your consumer chip implant, then press three to purchase this item."

    It'll be like portable Madlibs for citizen-consumers.
  151. A cheaper way of doing it already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Malta recently, and their Vodafone - owned mobile operator has simply put stickers with four digit codes on important landmarks. Send an SMS to the code, and it'll ring you back with an audio recording of a description of the place - why it's important, that sort of thing. The infrastructure is already there, and there's no need for tags that could break / get stolen / cost a bomb. Simple and effective, and no need to rely on BT or IR. This seem to be an overly complex solution to the problem.

  152. embed them in former girlfriends by Orthogonal+Jones · · Score: 1


    (or boyfriends)..while they're sleeping or during sex.

    Then whenever some guy scans her, a webpage comes up describing his/her likes and dislikes, family photos, favorite head games, etc.

  153. geocaching/easter eggs by fishmonkey · · Score: 1

    A very cool underground movement could start with this tech, like geocaching - individuals scattering access points around the city, like software easter eggs in real life

    --
    generic
  154. looks like a Wideray ripoff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who cares about Hypertag? Wideray has been doing this sort of stuff since early 2001. Their device transfers content to the end user using IR, bluetooth, or 802.11b and talks to the backend using GPRS or FLEX (broadcast pager network).

  155. Bar codes are easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't it be easier if cell phones simply had bar code scanners and a server or proxy entry where the user could enter their database of choice?

    Seems a heck of a lot easier. Pick up a book. Scan the UPC. The phone sends the UPC to the server of your selection, which then returns information based on settings (either set in the phone or when you got an account with the server). The information could be reviews, local showings, an internet comparison price check, Amazon sales ranking, etc.

    Posters could have bar codes on them. GPS info could also be sent, to get more localized information (e.g. zip codes where the movie is being shown).

  156. Local company by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

    I work a company in the same building as this (it's an office block for startups). They have a demo outside the building in the form of an advertising poster. Unfortunately, the poster is for Attack of the Clones and is now well over a year old. The battery on the tag has run out and it's just a waste of space now.

  157. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by TheRealJFM · · Score: 1

    Being named Joe, i take great offence at that.

    --
    Joseph Farthing
    http://josephfarthing.com
  158. Digimarc MediaBridge by Techie2000 · · Score: 1

    I beta tested software that does something like that called Digimarc Mediabridge where you could hold up a watermarked magazine article to your webcam and the software would send you to a URL with more information on it. Wired and Popular Mechanics both used the technology for a while. It now is pretty much dead as far as I can see.

    --
    "And I'm right. I'm always right, but in this case I'm just a bit more right than I usually am." - Linus Torvalds
  159. SemaCodes: WiFi + CueCat = UbiComp by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    May I suggest my own ideas on this subject? They are summarized over at SemaCodes: WiFi + CueCat = UbiComp ... Tag the real world with semacode URLs

    I kind of threw in UbiComp (ubiquitous computing) instead of location based computer (LBS) because they're basically the same thing, but the UbiComp people are cool, whereas the LBS people are all just chasing megabucks dreams.

    IMO

    simon

  160. Bluetooth? Use Camera Phones?!!! by sbwoodside · · Score: 1

    Whoa, I just had this crazy idea. Why bother with Bluetooth or barcode scanners when you can use Camera Phones!! There's already a ton of standard two-dimensional 2d barcode standards. All the camera phones are running Symbian with Java, or maybe Linux with Java. Write a little open source image processing application and then ...

    encode a URL into the barcode and take a photo of it ...there's your global namespace, your application platform is HTML or WAP or whatever. The whole network is already bootstrapped.

    It would be like semacodes but without any nasty dangly scanners to carry around.

    simon

  161. Reception in museums? by dimension6 · · Score: 1

    While this seems like a fine proposition, I have found that there is very little reception in many/most museums, especially those that delve underground with basement levels or have thick stone walls. Because of this, I think a lot of work would have to happen in order to make this work...

  162. Neat idea, please RTFA/W. by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    I think they're just beaming links for PalmOS machines. Check out their instructions for PDA users (basically 'Turn your damned beam-recieve on!')

    Apparently they've found a way to implement BeamPro EXPO on a cheap PIC, and maybe threw in a few non-Palm OS beam standards into the repeat loop. I've been wondering how long it was going to take somebody to develop this.... The possible applications really are great:

    Go to a restaurant, wave PDA at symbol, pick up an address book entry with their number, address, hours, and a concise version of their takeout menu.

    See a movie you like, but it's not playing yet? [Wave] it offers to put the opening date in your calandar, then offers a ToDo link with the website address.

    (For those of you who haven't used a PalmOS PDA, beamed events are cached with a 'Would you like to accept [...] into your datebook?', so you can turn down things you don't want.)

  163. goats... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, okay, so! I didn't read the article. Forum trolls will be creating hidden links to goatse in real life, too?!

  164. Remember Anti-Trust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That sounds exacly like Synapse to me.

  165. Use in video rental places and CD stores. by VPN3000 · · Score: 1

    " I'd like to use it at video rental places and CD stores to get product reviews. "

    You browse aimlessly around video and CD stores? That's so 80's. Your best bet would be to read reviews at home, in the comfort of your desk and without distraction. Then, go to the store and pick the items up. Sometimes you can even check inventory before leaving your house. You could even take the low-tek approach and call them to see if the items are in stock.. If you ask nicely, they may have your merchandise waiting at the counter for you.

    Plus, who wants to stand around in a store digging through a bunch of user reviews? Sounds like a waste of time. The retail establishment wouldn't do much to participate, as they prefer to control your shopping experience while on their premises.

    Technology like this is just about getting the "whoa!" out of people. Then it fades away with the excuse "the market wasn't ready yet".

    My point is, shopping is already easy enough of an experience. In the era of being able to get a car, Russian submarine, or house online, I just don't see it happening.

  166. How about dating ramifications by serutan · · Score: 1

    Say you point your cell phone at a person you see in public, and you get a readout of their social status and a rating of the match between your stored profiles. If you make the cut then you get the chance to place a call and have a brief conversation before waving like an idiot and meeting face to face.

    Or, I guess, you could just walk up and say Hi.

    1. Re:How about dating ramifications by NoahsMyBro · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of the bit in Amazon Women On The Moon called 'Two I.D.s', with Steve Guttenberg & Rosanna Arquette. In a nutshell, he tries to pick her up for a date, and she first must run a background check on him to certify his status, record of integrity or lack thereof, etc...

      On a side note, I thought the movie was hysterical, and far better than the 5.4/10 average vote suggests.

  167. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So carry a beam transmitter that will bounce off various objects with a URL to "TURN OFF YOUR DAMN PHONE!".

  168. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    It'll take 6 hours to read a Victoria's Secret catalog. A full day for Playboy.

    Read?

  169. phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will truly be useful when you can point your cellphone at a chick's bottom and get her contact information entered into your cell phone :)

    I'll take two!

    ---
    "too lazy to look manage my passwords"

  170. Read the webpage. by DivideByZero · · Score: 1

    If your PDA is on the list, chances are good it's supported. You point your IR window at the gadget, it beams you a ToDo, or maybe a calandar appointment.

  171. I already hear the question ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    Hey you look attractive, can I bookmark you

    or

    can I link you ?

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  172. Re:this better not replace what's already at museu by Thuktun · · Score: 1

    I personally think that cell phones should be banned in public places such as museums and this will just encourage Joe to hop on his cell phone and chat with Mary while I am trying to enjoy some peace and quiet.

    I really hate annoying cell phone users as well, but it's not really the phone that's at fault: it's the person using it who (1) doesn't have a vibrate-only ring and (2) insists on TALKING LOUDLY WHILE ON THE CELLPHONE. If you can't talk at a reasonable level given your environment, and you aren't in private, move elsewhere.

    I know people who TALK LOUDLY IN NORMAL SITUATIONS that become annoyances in the same way, and they're talking to someone right in front of them.

    People need to exercise volume control.

  173. Re:Wouldn't this be a single geeks dream come true by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1
    Or more likely:

    click > I like you like a brother.
    click > If you have to ask, you can't get it.
    click > You pervert! I'm calling the cops!
    click > [no response]

    Great, rejection by proxy.

    --
    I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.