Slashdot Mirror


Sony's New Vaio PCG-TR1A: 12" Powerbook Killer?

Anonymous Howard writes "Sony has a hot new subnote on it's hand: the Vaio PCG-TR1A. This subnote is packed full of features: integrated camera (still and video), 10.6 inch bright wide-format screen, 900MHz Centrino, CD-RW/DVD Combo drive, 30GB drive, 802.11b, two usb ports, firewire, 3.11 pounds and a magnesium alloy case. The thing looks really cool. For me, it's the first subnote that actually gives me a viable option for purchase instead of a the Apple Powerbook 12". Read a article about it over at Designtechnica. Check out this forum thread that has good pics, other then the stock pics, next to a VPR Matrix 200A5."

94 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.dell.com/us/en/bsd/products/model_latit _latit_x200.htm. it's pretty nice, although i prefer the c400 myself. the x200 is just too small.

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by KevetS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How can this be considered a PowerBook killer when it has no DVD-R option, and EXTERNAL DVD/CD-RW drives as the only possibility for burning cd's? Sure it looks small and light, but the 12" PowerBook has a hell of a lot crammed into it's small package, which is more than I can say for this Dell.

      --
      This is my United States of whatever.
    2. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      110 minutes? maybe burning cds back to back to back. i had one on for at least 3 hours, surfing over wireless

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    3. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about reading optical disks? (You know, those shiny things software and music sometimes come on.)

    4. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by haa...jesus+christ · · Score: 2, Informative

      i have the x200 and don't think it's too small. i'm not a small guy (6'2"), and i find the keyboard comfortable. and it's much less painful to carry than my ti book.

    5. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ahh. now i remember. i had the 6 cell battery. without extra batteries, you get a 4 cell.

      for the c400, you can get a 16 cell battery, but it pretty much doubles the height and weight. =(

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    6. Re:Dell has had one for some time too by ewhac · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Sony has a higher resolution LCD panel (1280 * 768). The Dell's only 1024 * 768.

      Schwab

  2. 12 inch powerbook killer? by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't see how it can be when it costs more. I purchased a 12 inch powerbook with a superdrive (DVR-R/CD-RW), 802.11g, firewire, 2 usb ports, 32mb nVivida gforce 4 and a bunch of other stuff for the same price as this thing, and the prices for the 12 inch pb have since gone down. I hardly see how its a "killer." Plus, I love how everyone plays catchup to apple. For such a small market share they sure do seem to set a lot of standards.

    --
    -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    1. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True. Also, I think Mac OS X is a significant value addition.

    2. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by thefinite · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're right, Apple Computers taste horrible, despite all of the "lickability" people talk about. Still, they do look great and kick butt over any other laptop.

      (This post written from my sixth limb--a TiPB 667.)

      --
      Boom Shanka
    3. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by ravenousbugblatter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree - no way in hell you can compare a 900 mhz centrino (which is nothing but a gimmick) against a 867mhz G4. Not to mention being able to burn DVD's on the powerbook, 802.11g, better graphics, a bigger screen, and the biggest thing of all - OS X 10.2 Jaguar, with the soon to be available OS X 10.3 Panther.

    4. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by markclong · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got a 1.6 Ghz Intel Pentium-M (centrino is a marketing gimmick. It is the chipset, processor, and wireless LAN module not the processor). The processor is as fast as a 2.4 Ghz Pentium chip in every benchmark I can run. Centrino may be a gimmick but the Pentium-M processor delivers real performance and allows for decent battery life too.

    5. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by huntz0r · · Score: 2, Informative

      However, something worth mentioning is that the Sony is slightly smaller and significantly lighter than the 12" Powerbook (4.6 vs 3.1 lb, quite a difference proportionally). It may be close enough to compare with the Apple, but its design was targetted differently; it sacrifices some features and some value in trade for improved portability.

      With all portables, there is a tradeoff between cheap, light, and powerful. Pick two :)

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
    6. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by pastafazou · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes. Everyone plays catchup with Mac all the time. That's why Mac dominates the desktop market.
      Apple dominates the desktop publishing market. Apple and Avid dominate the pro-video editing market (and if you think Macs are overpriced, you won't believe what Avid charges). Apple is the single largest vendor of professional audio editing machines in the music business. The only market Apple doesn't have significant market share is in the low-end desktop market, which is used for word-processing, spreadsheets, and accounting software. Apple makes high-end machines with good margins to fuel their R&D. The low end of the desktop market is a cutthroat, bloody mess! Look at Compaq, Packard Bell, AST, NEC, and many others who lost their shirts. Dell is the only company doing well in it because they don't do the R&D thing.
      Not. They are too expensive and proprietary.
      Hmmm....I have an old 8500 with a PowerPC 604 CPU. I can upgrade this machine to a G3 or a G4. I also have an old Pentium II machine which can be upgraded to...a faster Pentium II, but not an AMD processor, nor a Pentium III or Pentium IV, because Intel's CPU slots are PROPRIETARY . Apple embraces more open standards than Microsoft or Intel. As far as the price, I think I get my money's worth and more from the various Macs I've owned. If price is the only consideration you have when purchasing, then you should be blasting Intel, praising AMD, blasting Windows, and praising OSS.
      Just because they have a few innovative products doesn't mean they are the benchmark.
      Apparently they are, since this article was about Sony's new 12" Powerbook Killer. There's quite a few articles that get posted about company X's 17" Powerbook killer or company Y's all-in-one like an iMac but it's Wintel blah blah blah.
      I cite the G5 as a neat system, but not innovative in the current market.
      Yeah, 'cause everyone is using a 64-bit CPU that's backwards compatible with 32-bit software, 1GHz frontside bus, PCI-X expansion slots, Firewire 800, Gigabit Ethernet, High-speed Wireless, and 16GB/s of bandwidth between the CPU's and the system controller.
      I do consider the iPod innovative, as well as most of their laptop's designs.
      Might as well mention the iMac, since it won so many design awards for being innovative. So, let's see...that's the laptops, the iPod, the iMac, and maybe, just maybe, the G5 desktop. Which is their entire product line.
      Look at processor speeds on desktop systems over the past few years. It's already a rather foggy memory the last time I looked at a Mac's specs and thought 'wow, the PC market really needs to play some catchup!'. The last one I was impressed with were the PowerPC clones, actually. They moved pretty quick compared to PC's of the same price. But that was like '94 or '95..
      This is total crap. The G3 kicked the Wintel machines butts. The G4 was where the PC world finally caught up. On launch, the G4 kicked the P3's that were shipping at the time. But Motorola was unable to deliver the speed bumps to keep up, and then the P4 was out and the G4 was left behind. The G4's vector processing engine is still far superior to anything Intel has, which is why it's been used for so many Blast implementations.
      In the case of laptops, I agree in this particular case, but as for other configurations forget it. For the price of a new G5 I could have a monster of a PC that would make the G5 look like last year's PC except for the pretty case that matches a cinema display. Is that worth the extra money? Nah, I'll stick with Lian Li cases for now.
      Maybe you should do a little more reading. The high end G5 beats the best PC you can build right now with dual Xeon CPU's, and by the time you add all the features the G5 has, the price comes out to within a couple of hundred bucks of the G5. Plus you get OS X. Plus the G5 is much quieter than a dual-CPU PC.
      Yeah, you can get a G5 with dual CPU's.. Whoopee. For that

    7. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by David+Rolfe · · Score: 3, Informative
      I have to agree... if it can't burn DVD's it's not in the same class.

      To quote ars technica, "...[burning dvds] isn't just a luxury, it's a requirement" ;-)

      The 12" with DVD-R is $1,799.00 (and includes right off store.apple.com: 12.1-inch TFT Display 1024x768 resolution, 867MHz PowerPC G4, 256MB DDR266 SDRAM, 40GB Ultra ATA/100, SuperDrive, NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go 32MB DDR video memory, 10/100BASE-T Ethernet, FireWire 400, Bluetooth built-in, VGA & S-Video out)

      So compared to the Sony, you spend a 1.5 pounds more in weight to get ability to burn dvds, bigger display, bigger harddrive, more ram, os x, and with the difference in price you could buy an iSight and ... gasp take stills and video. The review of the Sony puts battery life between 2.5 to 7 hours ... the Powerbook is like 3 to 5 hours.

      I guess what it comes down to is that if you are willing to pay more, you can look at a smaller screen and video conference for two extra hours (assuming the camera and iLink aren't what drags that battery down to the 2.5 hour mark)

      I'm not sold on the editorial stance 'Powerbook Killer'. :-\

      --
      Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    8. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by bigfatlamer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sold on the editorial stance 'Powerbook Killer'

      Absolutely. Why not just say that it's finally some competition for the 12" PB as opposed to a PB Killer? As with all things, you make trade-offs buying one over the other.

      One thing the Vaio does have going for it is that it's more complete than any other Wintel notebook of it's size. You can get a number of other subnotebooks with decent sized screens, WiFi, etc., but they require external (USB in most cases) optical drives. Doubles the weight and decreases the portability dramatically.

      If I was looking for a Wintel notebook, this, in spite of being dramatically underpowered, esp. compared to the PB, I'd probably go with this Vaio. At the very least, it's the least ugly Wintel notebook out there.

      BFL

      --
      There's one thing computing teaches you, and that's that there's no point to remembering everything.
      --Doug Copland
    9. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by dootbran · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >I also have an old Pentium II machine which can be upgraded to...a faster Pentium II, but not an AMD processor, nor a Pentium III or Pentium IV, because Intel's CPU slots are PROPRIETARY.

      BULLSHIT. You can drop in your choice of P II, P III, or C3 processor. If your motherboard is simply too crappy, well, it's not my fault you invested in PC Chips junk.

      Thats kinda harsh, I mean excuse me for not knowing that intel was 18 months from bringing out the P3 with a 100mhrfz fsb when I picked up my p2 233 back in the day. let alone the 133 mghfs bus 3 years down the line. I know that your all knowing magic hat told you what kind of upgrades where in the pipeline but not all of us can be so enlightened.

      And, more bullshit, yes, you can upgrade even your 486 motherboard to a P IV. It's called a PCI slot motherboard, and it's the same bullshit "upgrade" that Apple is feeding you. Except they pretend it's a good idea. It isn't.

      Actually apple doesn't feed any upgrades, at all! No cdr or dvdr upgrades ever. They do have easy access ram and sometimes HDD or PCI/AGP but as far as I know go they don't really handle CPU upgrades.

      Demand is the reason for this, not stupid Apple R&D. They are apparently good enough for some consumers. A new Mac is kinda expensive.

      >Apple embraces more open standards than Microsoft or Intel.

      LOL! Show me some Jaguar source code! Why did it take so long to get the iPod working on windows? Why did Apple put Appletalk on your old Mac? Why are all firewire ports I've seen called i.Link, S-400, or IEEE1394?

      First off, standards are not really equal to open source. Crap, the guy wasn't even mentioning oss in his argument, it says Microsoft, maybe you missed it because it was spelled wrong. I've been reading slashdot for a while and I guess that they changed their name to Micro$oft now. That is how everyone is writing it now...

      And who the hell knows why ieee1394 has seventeen different names. Pisses me off too, but it is part of a standard so I don't really see what the point is, at least the stuff is compatible even if its a tad confusing.

      >Apparently they are, since this article was about Sony's new 12" Powerbook Killer.

      Oh yeah, that 12" powerbook. It's so innovative to squeeze a bunch of high-tech into a small box!

      Yeah, uh.. this is way out of context. He actually said something more along the lines of the powerbooks being the benchmark for laptops, benchmarks aren't necessarily innovative they just kick ass.

      Look, if you want innovative, look at Gateway's Handbook. Now THAT'S innovative. Heck, I remember those being made back some time around '92 with 286 processors! Apple just dusted off some history books.

      And this is of course totally relevant because not only are Gateway computers totally sweet today but this particular model is so freaking awesome that kids are paying outrageous amounts of money on ebay for them. I'm sure some more patient individual could scape up even more innovative pieces of hardware from apple's past that would be a total indication of the companies total domination of the entire world today.

      >The G3 kicked the Wintel machines butts.

      Did it? Dollar for Dollar? MIPS to MIPS?

      Or was it just in specially optimized applications?

      This is just stupid, what the hell do you buy a computer for; to not run applications?? I know that my ibook was actually purchased for the reason of doing continual benchmarks and watching the result. Or maybe I just wanted to be able to browse the web, on an application written for my computer.

      Who cares if the performance of an real world application is a result of optimization. It may make yo

    10. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by I_M_Noman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      To quote ars technica, "...[burning dvds] isn't just a luxury, it's a requirement" ;-)
      I must be a complete troglodyte, because I don't have a need to burn DVDs. Neither do any of my friends or colleagues. There is the occasional CD backup of a recorded Centra session, but that's done in the studio on a beefy workstation. And watching movies on a laptop? Not so much.

      Am I the only person left who only uses his laptop as a computer instead of as a home entertainment center? (Not flamebait, but a genuine question.)
    11. Re:12 inch powerbook killer? by rwhamann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Notebook backup to CD's or DVD's? I've never been enamored of backup's that require multiple peices of media. My notebok backup solution is my 20gb Archos, enough space to back up my 10gb notebook drive. Having said this, I'd still want the Powerbook over the VAIO, but for OS X, not the Superdrive.

      --
      seg fault
  3. Interesting... by Rura+Penthe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting that Apple's notebooks (and mp3 player) are now the standard others are compared against. A big shift since the 90s...

    1. Re:Interesting... by SN74S181 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's something that I don't understand.

      Unless you've bought into Apple's desktop systems, buying an Apple notebook means having to maintain two seperate sets of software to run on your systems.

      I look at the Powerbook and shake my head because I have too much fairly good and rather expensive Windows software. If I'm going to run a second software platform (which I do) I want it to be a free software platform. I'm not interested in investing lots of money in applications for yet another properietary OS.

      I guess if I had an unlimited amount of money to spend, the Powerbook would be worth considering. But then if I had an unlimited amount of money I would get an IBM PPC based laptop to run AIX and/or NetBSD on.

    2. Re:Interesting... by neuroklinik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I'm not interested in investing lots of money in applications for yet another properietary OS."

      Hmm... Open-source Darwin core... X11... More "open" technologies than you could shake a stick at... Loads of great built-in languages... Freely available ports of tons of great Unix apps... Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

    3. Re:Interesting... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If it's the cost of software keeping you back, I have to ask... why? If you play by the rules, you'll (generally, according to most licenses I've seen, anyway) have to buy separate copies of your existing apps for the laptop anyway; if you don't play by the rules, and duplicate the ones from your desktop to use on the laptop, you could just warez the Mac versions as well. Either way you'll probably wind up paying about the same for your laptop's apps regardless of platform. Just a thought...

      (I do of course realize, though, this doesn't apply if you play by the rules and also get those essential apps bundled with the machine on one platform but not the other, and it also doesn't apply if the apps you want/need aren't made for the Mac and there are no equivalents that can open & save the same files.)

    4. Re:Interesting... by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

      Well, the audio and video APIs, for example, which are still based on Cocoa and are a pain to use. And the Mac doesn't use an X11 desktop, it only runs X11 apps under Aqua, so X11 apps don't have good desktop integration. And OS X graphics isn't exactly fast. And on and on.

      Overall, I have found that OS X is usable as a sort-of UNIX laptop, but less than ideal. Get one if you need to run OS X apps. If all applications you want to run are Linux/UNIX apps, an x86 laptop running Linux is cheaper, faster, and easier to install and maintain.

    5. Re:Interesting... by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess if I had an unlimited amount of money to spend, the Powerbook would be worth considering. But then if I had an unlimited amount of money I would get an IBM PPC based laptop to run AIX and/or NetBSD on.

      If I had an unlimited amount of money I would be too busy being fed grapes by supermodels on my 500 foot yacht to worry about laptops.

    6. Re:Interesting... by SN74S181 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

      It should be fairly obvious, but people seem to not notice.

      Mac OS X only runs on a single source of hardware. That makes it extremely proprietary.

    7. Re:Interesting... by Laur · · Score: 2, Informative
      +5 Insightful? Sheesh.

      Open-source Darwin core

      Darwin may be open, but it isn't free. It's licensed under the Apple Public License, which is NOT a free license.

      X11

      Okay, what about X11. OS X doesn't run on X11, it runs on Aqua and Quartz, which are both very much closed source and proprietary. Yes, there are X servers for OS X. Yes, there are X servers for Windows and virtually every other desktop OS that I know of. What exactly was your point?

      More "open" technologies than you could shake a stick at

      What are you referring too? BSD userland? Apps? Just because the userland and apps are free doesn't mean the underlying OS is. Cygwin works great on Windows.

      Loads of great built-in languages.

      See my comment about userland stuff and apps. Do these languages not work on Windows?

      Freely available ports of tons of great Unix apps

      Again, just because the apps are free doesn't mean the underlying OS is. Cygwin contains ports of tons of great Unix apps, others have been ported to Windows natively, doesn't make Windows any less proprietary. Free software also runs great on lots of other proprietary Unixes (AIX, HP-UX, Solaris, Irix, etc.), Mac OS X isn't much different in this respect.

      Exactly what is so "proprietary" about Mac OS X that is scaring you away?

      Now don't get me wrong, I love how Apple is using and working with the open source world. However, Mac OS X is NOT a free OS, it is very much proprietary. Can you download and build Mac OS X from source? Can you play and tweak with the source, or port it to other architectures? Is there even a way to put Aqua and Quartz on top of an OpenDarwin core? Can you avoid the expensive OS upgrades to gain necessary functionality (most apps, like Safari and Apple's X server won't run on anything less than 10.2)? There's nothing inherently wrong with proprietary OS's, just don't try to pretend that OS X isn't one.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    8. Re:Interesting... by Adrian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I've been a unix guy for about 15 years, and a mac and unix person for about 10 years.

      The nice thing about Mac OS X is I get to be both on the same machine. If you have a piece of Linux/FreeBSD code you can almost certainly run it on Mac OS X.

      While Mac OS X isn't a free OS - it is a *very* good free software platform (and there is also VirtualPC if you need to run some legacy Windows software - slowly :-)

    9. Re:Interesting... by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      because the 5 second delay while my xterm redraws after I drag a window in front of it on XFree86 is so amazingly fast compared to OS X

      That's nonsense; xterm redraws have been imperceptible on regular hardware for years.

      OS X which has minimal redraw latency even with transparent windows

      Yes, it does, by shoving graphics content into the server. But that's not drawing speed, that's redrawing speed. You can tell X11 to do the same thing, it just happens to be disabled by default because it's pointless on a properly configured system.

      How exactly is "Linux" easier to install and maintain? Portage is available for OS X - the exact same package management system for a popular desktop distro.

      The problem is that OS X package management isn't consistent: some applications are updated by Apple, others are updated by hand, yet others have their own built-in update systems, and then there are several ported Linux and BSD package managers. The upshot is that maintaining an OS X system requires a lot of manual work, while Linux systems update themselves completely automatically and consistently.

      In any case, I think most people will find that all the applications that they could possibly miss (usual POSIX console utilities and emacs) are there, along with some much improved ones (xchat) and a whole new plethora of cocoa apps - that perhaps they didn't know they wanted ;)

      There is a lot of UNIX/Linux software that doesn't work on OS X and is a pain to port. Problems are non-UNIX implementations of audio, video, I/O, and just general differences in header files and libraries.

      After having built a fully optimized gentoo system (2.4.21-ck3, XFree86 4, fluxbox) for my Athlon XP 2000+, I was bitterly disappointed to note the above noted redraw lag. IM(NS)HO, OS X desktop interactivity is faster.

      You are probably using an unaccelerated video driver or have some other configuration problem. You can't blame Linux for that. If you want good performance with no hassles, buy a system that comes with Linux support out of the box.

  4. Power comparison by Millyways · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A 900 MHZ Centrino really doesn't compare that well to a 987MHZ G4.

    1. Re:Power comparison by uunh+haun · · Score: 2, Informative

      that's 867

  5. Battery Life. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 3, Interesting
    extra long battery life, estimated at 2.5 - 7 hours

    That's a pretty wide range...

    1. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not in the opinions of %5 - %90 of its potential customers.

    2. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      2.5 if the laptop is on.

      7.0 if it's off.

    3. Re:Battery Life. by vidnet · · Score: 5, Funny

      They should never have put in that red "Off"-light.

    4. Re:Battery Life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But we used a "Power efficent" 25 Watt bulb.

  6. nope by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 3, Informative
    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  7. 900MHz Centrino by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sony used to use Transmeta chips in their subnotebooks. This can't be good news for TMTA. It's good that Linus could read the writing on the wall, but I feel bad for their other employees... facing unemployment in this economy. And, let's be honest, even if they do find work elsewhere, few companies have as much potential as Transmeta had.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:900MHz Centrino by dnaboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Potential, true, but Transmeta was doomed long ago. With StrongARM processers in PocketPCs which run faster than the original Celerons (400MhZ Pocket PCs vs 300 on my old POS Compuke), way higher speed current generation celerons, and Centrino as a way of marketing a chip / board / etc combination, Intel pretty much has the low through high end (along with AMD) of the market covered.

      I know someone, had I not mentioned it, would instantly pipe in that all MhZs are not created equal (I'm a Mac nut- trust me I know), but I'm merely trying to say that there really is no niche for Transmeta anymore.

      Once again from your intellectual, moral, social, and emotional superior,

  8. OSX On Sony? by evil_roy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hard to believe. It's going to be hard to be a PowerBook killer without it.

    1. Re:OSX On Sony? by SN74S181 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, for lots of us, (one could say 'for the rest of us') OSX is the Powerbook killer. It might be a cool OS platform, but since all our Adobe apps, etc. are the Windows versions, etc. etc. the fact that the Powerbook only runs OSX kills it as an option. Where binary OS lockin is concerned, why switch from one lockin (Windows) to another (OSX)?

    2. Re:OSX On Sony? by horsie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, Adobe allows cross-platform upgrades on selected software titles. If you have PS7 on the PC and decided to switch to the Mac, then just call up Adobe customer service.

      You will have to sign a "Letter of Destruction" promising that you will destroy your PC version of the software and fax a copy to Adobe before they ship you your CD.

      I did it, and only paid for shipping for Adobe Photoshop 7.0...

      So you CAN switch without costing yourself an arm and a leg. As for MS products, that's an entirely different story, but then again, you also have OpenOffice for OS X as an alternative.

  9. You haven't looked very hard by csnydermvpsoft · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmm... you obviously haven't looked very hard.

  10. A Question by X-wes · · Score: 5, Informative

    Seems Slashdotted--Here are some pics from Sony.com

    Not so much a comment as a question...

    What has really set the Vaio apart from ye olde everyday laptop was the interesting addition of the integrated still/video camera. Are there any other manufacturers out who do this? Also...is it really usable as an integrated camera?

    1. Re:A Question by babbage · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Also...is it really usable as an integrated camera?

      I think the point of this, as it is with Apple's new iSight camera, isn't for point & shoot photography, but for use as a webcam.

      Of course, the iSight seems to be a pretty high quality piece of glass, with a fast f/2.8 aperture, standard 50mm focal length, and capable of taking in 30 frames per second of 640x480 video. The only thing the iSight is missing, really is storage: aside from the Firewire cable, it has no capability to record anything, which makes it useless without the six foot tether to your computer.

      My guess is that Sony is thinking of the same sorts of usages that Apple has in mind for iSight. I doubt the quality is as good as Apple's product, but at the same time it should hopefully be better quality than the camera they're putting on PDAs like the NX-70V that I've got. That camera is fun to use (great for getting quick snapshots at times that I wouldn't have thought to bring a real camera with me, like the supermarket or subway), but the image quality is just terrible at a very hazy & low-contrast 320x480.

      Hopefully this laptop is somewhere in the middle between the iSight & the Clie. Sony's product page doesn't seem to have camera specs, but something like a 1 or 2 megapixel still camera & 30fps video camera would be good for recording images to your hard drive, while a capacity to put out possibly lower quality stills & video over the web would be pretty nice.

      Oh, and don't forget -- if it can do the webcam thing (which I think is natural for a laptop mounted camera), plan on it being a subscription service to unlock whatever proprietary software & hardware Sony put on there. They're notorious for that kind of thing.

  11. Sony Notebook?? by unixwin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you *EVER* tried to load a different OS (as in what did not come originally on the system) nto a Sony Notebook?? You will tear your hair and generally feel like throwing out the notebook... ou will find no drivers or support on their site or it, and contacting Sony will give you a response of "It did not come with that OS so we do ot support it"

    I am not talking about putting Linux/BSD or Solaris (what I am thinking??) ... just a Win2k or something.

    Plus their position/membership/stance on DMCA,RIAA et. all makes me want to spend my money elsewhere...

    --
    -- everyones not everybody and neither is everybody like everyone.
    1. Re:Sony Notebook?? by rindeee · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well...yes. I just did so last Friday. I have an old PCG-C1VN (the original Picturebook) with the Transmeta 600MHz. It came with ME preinstalled (worthless). I have run several different Linux distros on it. On Friday I reformatted it and installed W2K as I just got a T-Mobile wireless Internet card (only works on Windows...out of the box) and wanted to use it on my smallest laptop. Went to Sony's sight and clicked on the link for Installing W2K on the PCG-C1VN. Had all the drivers, and all "special instructions" for such things as installing the drivers in the right order (dependancies in effect) and getting W2K to allow the odd (1024x480) resolution. Lots of drivers to download, but no real problems. Works great with my T-Mobile card. All that said, it isn't the most useful notebook PC in the world...I much prefer my Thinkpad with SuSE 8.2.

      ER

    2. Re:Sony Notebook?? by Aix · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know about other models, but until I dropped it and broke the screen after 3+ years, I was very happy running Red Hat, then Debian and then Gentoo on my Vaio PCG-XG9. I found support for pretty much everything but the WinModem. A single anecdote does not a dataset make, but hey, you asked "Have you *EVER* tried..." and yes, I have. Successfully.

  12. VAIO no-way by mpd2014 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I recently sold my Vaio after owning it for less than a year. Memory had problems, seemed slow and just did not live up to expectations. I recently bought a Mac PowerBook G4, my first Mac laptop and I am extremely pleased with it. Airport Extreme 802.11G works flawlessly with my Linksys router using the G standard, I have Apache, mod_perl, MySQL, PhP and host of other apps installed all working flawlessly. If you're looking for a great UI with unix under the hood look no further.

  13. 12" vs 10.6" by ajiva · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How can this thing be better, when the screen is 1.4" smaller? Heck I think 12" is too small, but 10.6"? Geez can anyone even read /. on that? :)

  14. Linux support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    12" Powerbook killer... err except that all Apple hardware is very well supported by linux... whereas the Centrino 802.11b isn't supported at all. So your fancy subnotebook is going to have an 802.11b card sticking out the side.

    Unless you want to run Windows that is, in which case you have bigger problems. :)

    1. Re:Linux support by naitro · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have a 12" PowerBook G4 which I run Debian on.

      The 802.11g-chip isn't supported by Linux at all and nVidia doesn't release their Linux drivers for PowerPC - I wouldn't call that "very well supported".

      But apart from the WLAN and the fancy graphic drivers (I use the one bundled with XFree86 4.3.0) it works like a charm :-).

  15. Well it's slashdotted ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2, Informative
    But yeah there's a little problem with calling it a "powerbook killer" for one, it doesn't run Mac OS. That would be a key component for it to "kill" the power book's notebook share. Plus lets face it there are many laptops for many needs. Many things come into play when purchasing a laptop and best bang for the buck seems to be the #1 reason people actually buy laptops.

    While this may be cool (wouldn't know can't read the article), let's face it people will sacrifice weight, size, and battery life for a cheaper model that does the same thing. UNLESS they are walking around with the thing, or travel a lot, or have a particular breifcase they'd like this to fit it. Believe it or not I've seen someone buy a new laptop because it was the right "size" of the breif case they had grown quite accustomed to.

    12" is hard to read at a res bigger than 1024x768 as well. I really don't see this thing killing anything as there are so many laptops on the market now that no one can decide on one "ultimate" laptop.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  16. Price, price, price by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple's 12" Powerbook costs $1,600 ($1,400 for students), while the new Sony Vaio is expected to cost around $2,000. Even with the cheaper price, the Apple laptop gives you 10GB more hard drive space, and a larger screen, and OS X as well. The only advantage I see is the weight difference, as the Sony weighs 32% less than the Apple. As long as you don't have trouble lifting 4.6 pounds, go for the Apple. :^)

    1. Re:Price, price, price by Bronz · · Score: 2, Insightful


      And using that logic... I recently purchased an HP laptop with a 14" XGA screen for $599 after rebates! You have to understand that when laptops get _smaller_ they sometimes get more expensive. Knowing this, you won't say strange things like "laptop X is cheaper AND bigger!"

    2. Re:Price, price, price by rzbx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Want good price and small size. Check out the Fujitsu P2000 series. Starting at around $1300. http://www.fujitsupc.com/

      Few quick specs:
      Transmeta 933mhz Crusoe
      10.6" Widescreen SXGA
      256 RAM, up to 384
      DVD/CD-RW drive
      Mobility Radeon
      2.8-3.4 lbs
      optional built in wireless as well

      Too small for me though, so I bought the S2000 with the AMD proc.

      --
      Question everything.
    3. Re:Price, price, price by 73939133 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Apple's 12" Powerbook costs $1,600 ($1,400 for students), while the new Sony Vaio is expected to cost around $2,000.

      That's probably because the Sony hardware is quite a bit nicer: 3 pounds vs. 4.6 pounds, 1280x768 screen vs. 1024x768 screen, PCMCIA slot vs. no PCMCIA slot, USB2 vs. no USB2. The difference in weight alone is a huge difference and should more than account for the price difference.

      If you want something directly comparable to the 12" Powerbook, the Fujitsu P5000 is the same price and the same weight. And the Fujitsu P2000 is actually smaller, lighter, and cheaper than the 12" Powerbook (although has somewhat fewer features).

    4. Re:Price, price, price by frogfroth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Another *possible* advantage of the Sony would be the integrated cameara. However, the new iSight from Apple probably produces better images and for $1800 (12"PB w/SuperDrive) + $150 iSight even without discounts the machine comes in at a lower price, in addition to getting *DVD burner *extra two inches of screen, give or take *OS X and iLife, etc. etc. *FireWire Hmm, doens't seem much like a PowerBook killer at all.

  17. Re:They're not. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Just the Mac-heads here do that.
    With story titles like "Powerbook Killer?", wouldn't you expect the Mac-heads to defend themselves?
  18. Untapped Market? by VidarJMD · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems to me there is a largely untapped market for notebooks. As I shop for one I am looking for a small, lightweight system with a long lasting battery. What I am NOT looking for is a 1Ghz+ system. I do not want a laptop that replaces my desktop but instead one that accompanies it. 500MHz is plenty for something that I would use for word processing, listening to music, and browsing the web. As processor technology improves you'd thing the long battery life and other features would make a great combination with older processors but I never see that. The only choice is to buy an old laptop but it's big and bulky and usually used. On top of that the cost savings isn't enough to warrent such a device. Why don't I ever see something like this: Pentium III 500MHz 20GB Harddrive 128MB RAM 12 inch screen 4lbs or less And some crappy 4MB video for $500 I'd buy one in a heartbeat. I just want something portable yet more capable than a PDA. I don't want to replace my desktop.

    1. Re:Untapped Market? by gmg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The specs that you mentioned are quite close to the old Toshiba Portege 1740ct. I recall that it came with a much smaller hard drive (6 or 10 gigs), but everything else is the same, including the crappy 4 meg trident cyblade video card. I dont recall battery life. Ran debian quite nicely though. Ironically, used 1740s are probably selling for less than $500 on the internet right now.

    2. Re:Untapped Market? by ksi440 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Pointed out earlier in this thread, but Fujitsu seems to be the leader in this area.

      Check here and look at the ultraportable section. The specs on the P5000 seem to match your requirements.

      Also, on the seriously portable side, they have the P1000 (2.2 lbs, no cd) and the P2000 (3.4 lbs, DVD ).

    3. Re:Untapped Market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just had the same discussion with my friend who is now in charge of buying for the aeronautical company he works for and he says he has yet to authorize a laptop upgrade....

      a Thinkpad running P3-900 with 256megs ram DOES NOT have to be replaced for people who basically run spreadsheet, powerpoint, browser, mail client.
      A few CAD program users but they never bitched. its the sales and marketing guys (surprise) who are always claiming that NOT having a Powerbook is affecting their work.

      zeke

  19. PB 12" Killer? by bastard01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um, if I remember the benches for everyday use, there already was a 12" powerbook killer. Not much less performance, with the exception on altivec, and cheaper too.

  20. Re:3.11 Lbs by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Informative

    yeah and on my 12 in PB, I get a DVD-RW/CD-RW

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  21. linux-sony mailing list by rtnz · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not sure if this one runs Linux but anyone else running Linux on Sony Laptops should check out the linux-sony mailing list.

  22. 12" Powerbook killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This VAIO costs $700 more than a 12" Powerbook. Show me a Mac user who actually wants a Windows machine, or better yet, wants to pay *more* for one?

    1. Re:12" Powerbook killer? by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      More ports? My iBook (and that counts PowerBooks) has all the ports I need. I don't wan't any more thanks.

      As pointed out earlier, the PowerBook also has a DVD-R drive and a couple of other goodies.

      The only thing the Sony has going for it is weight and slightly higher resolution (which is a bad thing for some people aswell, since the screen is smaller to). If it was the same price we might have a contest here.

  23. uhh... Don't forget about support by danlor · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you ever tried to call Sony's support desk? I have a pretty sweet little sony R505-ELK. It has been a really great machine, until I started loosing sectors. So I called them up to get a warentee replacement. They told me... and I quote... "That's only a couple megs! You have a 30 gig drive. That doesn't come close to meeting our criteria for failure." They went on to explain that they would not replace the drive until it was completely nonfunctional.

    So. Please keep this in mind before you make the leap. Dell and Apple have high support ratings for a reason. Your laptop WILL fail at some point. Make sure you pick a company that honors thier warentees. Although as of late, Dell has been getting pretty bad too.

  24. Re:3.11 Lbs by X_Caffeine · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been carrying a Vaio Z505 for about three years now, and have never once been in a situation where I was away from home and needed the optical drive. I just don't install software when I'm working or surfing at a coffee shop.

    And flimsy? What, do you mean it's flexible or something? Sony shipped laptops with metal (magnesium alloy) frames long before the "tibook" came out.

    That said, I'll be picking up an iBook soon... but I sure wish they would shave a few pounds off it by leaving out the optical drive.

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  25. Re:3.11 Lbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps the pound unit should be measured as a fraction of the total weight of a US Tank ripping through the cobblestones of your quaint European village street.

  26. One of the most important questions for a subnote by Tyrdium · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How's the screen and keyboard? I drooled over the Actius MM10 for months, but when I went to Micro Center I immediately hated it. The 10" screen tries to pack in a resolution of 1024 x 768, and the keyboard is tiny. Heck, the thing is even missing one of the shift keys... Since most of what I do on a subnote is typing (since, given their power, they aren't decent for gaming), screen size and keyboard usability (and battery life) are some of the largest factors for me. My iBook has a great keyboard (the one on the 12" PB G4 is even better), an amazing screen, and a battery life of over four hours. The only thing I don't like about it is the lack of a PCMCIA slot and the fact that Apple tech repair keeps sending it back with problems (the thing is making this really annoying ticking noise, and the ethernet port is shot). The ethernet port wouldn't be such a big deal, except that it has no PCMCIA slot for me to plug an adapter into, there are no Mac drivers for any USB adapters, and they want 600ish bucks to get the motherboard replaced... Conclusion: Macs make great lightweight notebooks, but have a few design flaws. All in all, they're probably better than the new Sony laptop.

  27. Shhh! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The powerbook is more expensive! Macs have to be more expensive, or what would the trolls complain about (Greater ease of use? Longer battery life?)?

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  28. Re:Sony uses ACPI not good for non MS OS by rtnz · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is not true. There are plenty of people including me running ACPI on a sony-laptop without any problems. You can check out the mailing list archives for more info. The problem is that most distro's don't include ACPI by default (except SuSe at least), but the new RedHat beta that came out today includes ACPI in it. Building your own kernel with the ACPI patch is not a bit deal as well.

  29. Re:3.11 Lbs by CausticWindow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah, I think it's closer to a very large multiple of the weight of all the Weapons Of Mass Destruction the US has uncovered in Iraq.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
  30. Is it really worth it? by macemoneta · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've just this weekend completed installation of muLinux on an old 25MHz 486SX laptop with 8MB of RAM and a 500MB hard drive that I got for free (because the previous owner thought it was trash). It weights about 4 pounds, and has a TFT color 640x480 screen. I'm now browsing the web, reading email, and SSHing into my server with it. It's very usable.

    I have to wonder why so much perfectly good equipment goes to waste, while people lust after new machines, so that their CPU idle time can go from 99% to 99.5%. Especially among the ./ geeks, who probably have top end machines already.

    Seriously people, if you want to play a game, get a game console. If you want some REAL fun, install Linux with just a floppy drive. :-)

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  31. Not a Powerbook killer for that reason... by matt_maggard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like a sony (or maybe any PC) is not a powerbook killer for the reasons listed in the parent comment. I have never had to worry about installing any other Apple OS on any supported machine and I have never had to jump throught these kind of hoops (installing drivers in the right order? for christ's sake!).

    Now, even though I am a long time mac user/proponent, I use PCs at work and the pure usablity gap is decreasing. But when it comes to polish, fit and finish, and total cost of ownership - I just can't see the pc as a good choice for most people. It's too bad that the price sticker at best buy doesn't have to include a breakdown of how much the unit will cost over its lifetime and how much hair you will pull out (sort of like energy costs on appliances).

    Everytime I think of adding an ultralight PC laptop to my home network to run the odd pc app, I read these posts and remember that it ain't worth it.

    And the things cost way more than a 12" PB!

    -matt

  32. Firewire? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2, Informative

    Knowing Sony, they're probably going to be those crippled (as in no power supply wires) iLink ports. I can't tell from the linked pictures. If so, you can forget about using Firewire to charge an iPod, or using a bus-powered hard drive.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  33. Catchup?! by autopr0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wtf? Sony has had a 10 inch (not 12 inch) entry in the laptop market for years. I've owned mine for almost two years! True there was a gap between the SRX and this thing, but still. It's ridiculous to say that Sony if "following" apple because they released a laptop that's "small" I mean come on. There have been much smaller laptops through history, like the Toshiba Libretto.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  34. PCMCIA MIA by rje · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Has anyone noticed that it lacks PCMCIA slots? Sure its cool and I'd like one but I sure find it easier to move my digital photos off my compact flash cards with a PCMCIA adapter. Memory sticks don't work in a Nikon CoolPix 5000.

  35. Switched! by huntz0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seems you forgot the last sentence of your comment... perhaps I can help?

    I'm __________________ and I'm a __________________ .

    (fill the blanks)

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly affected when you come and go, you come and go)
  36. Powerbooks are very fashionable by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "For such a small market share they sure do seem to set a lot of standards."
    Too bad taste isn't one of those standards.

    Pay attention to the laptops in TV/magazine/newspaper ads, not to mention TV shows, music videos...and of course movies...by far, Apple Powerbooks are the laptop of choice, and when a movie features a pseudo-screen-graphic, it usually bears a play-skool resemblence to the older MacOS. Oh, and the sounds you hear while Joe Movie Star is working at the computer...is usually either an ancient seagate MFM drive(wee wee...wee wooo weee) or a Macintosh 3.5" drive(Boop boop boop boop boop brrrrp booop boop). The MFM drive sound not surprisingly is more popular in the low-budg films(just kidding :-)

    You have to kind of look closely since they almost always black out the Apple logo(esp on the powerbooks that have glowing apple logos :-), but the case is very distinctive on the G3 powerbooks(the Lombard was code-named after Lombard Street in CA- the curviest street in the world..because almost every surface of the case is curved.)

    In fact, at one point, one of the major fashion magazines many years back said the most fashionable item you could have on you while walking down Wall St. was a Powerbook under your arm(probably where the Wallstreet codename came from). The TiBook continues the trend- they're downright gorgeous machines, at least before the paint starts chipping from the case(which is why Apple is, on new models, using unpainted aluminum external surfaces- the painted exterior of the 15" Tibook did NOT go over very well).

  37. Re:Troll? by Delphiki · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Mac zealots are stupid because they think only Macs are worth paying attention to. Windows zealots are stupid because they don't realize that there are things other than Windows. Linux zealots are stupid because they discount anything that's not Open Source. Conclusion? Zealots are stupid. Sony is not following Apple. Apple didn't invent the small and light notebook. They just did it better than anyone else had to that point. This notebook by Sony is nice but I could get a 12" PowerBook for $1399... loaded with the options I'd want more like $1600-$1700.. still considerably lower than the Sony. The metal case is a bit derivative, but it's got a different look from the PowerBooks and I like it (I like the PowerBooks a little bit more, but that's me).

    --

    Feel free to mod me "-1 - Angry Jerk".

  38. unusable for me by AssFace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't possibly imagine using one of these.

    I am certainly not against Sony, I bought a Vaio for my fiancee. But I personally have no idea how anyone can use one of these things on a daily basis.

    If you have a monitor and a keyboard and a mouse to plug into it so that it is essentially a mobile station that you move about, then that makes sense.

    Of if you have that setup at work for all your uses, but if you travel to a client site you can then bring the little thing with you and use it to do a presentation - you can woo them with the little shiny thing that you brought with you to do it all.

    But I just can't imagine using it, sitting there typing on it and the screen... ugh.
    It would drive me absolutely nuts.

    I have my 15" screen at 1400Xwhatever and a nearly full keyboard on mine and it still is a bit confining for my tastes, but is at least usable.

    I use this at work and at home (at work I have a desktop that I do most of my work on, the laptop is for work that goes with me all the time).
    When I get a new one, I will either get one of the Dells that can do 1600x1200 and has a brighter screen, or I will go to powernotebooks.com and see what I can setup there.

    I'm still trying to wrap my head around why someone would seek out a smaller laptop.
    Easy to carry, lighter, less screen to drive means longer battery life to some extent... but to actually use the damn thing...
    Shows I'm narrow minded I guess.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  39. Re:Now let's be honest here by ghjm · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay, so the original poster's point was that he already warezed those programs for Windows, and the Mac versions are really hard to find on Kazaa.

    Seriously. If Apple went out of their way to create a vibrant warez scene for all the third-party OS X apps, they would sell much more hardware. I've seen worse business strategies.

    -Graham

  40. Never, ever buy Sony Vaio by Newton+IV · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought two nearly ideantical Sony Vaios (PCG-Z505LS and PCG-R505TS), hoping that ,if one breaks, the other one will be working. No, wrong! In two years, in the Z505LS internal power board had to be replaced, modem jack fell off, and Win 2000 "had bad interplay with VAIO hardware" (this is a quotation from MSFT Customer support). In R505LS, hard drive broke, and firewire jack broke. First computer has been sent to Sony Repair Center 3 times, second- two times. In all 5 cases, the turnover time was very long, and once the notebook arrived unrepaired, so it had to be re-sent. Never again!

  41. Sony support by weg · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since I've experienced Sony's so called "support" I've decided to never buy a Sony product again. My girl friend had problems with her Sony Vaio FX802, so we sent it in and it came back unrepaired. I had to beg them to pick it up again, btw. the hotline is not free in Austria, even if you still have warranty. This time I added a very detailed description on how to reproduce the error, however, the technician ignored it and called my girl friend to complain in a very harsh tone that the notebook was not defect. I talked to the technician and could convince him that it was in fact defect, and after 3 more weeks we got it back (they exchanged the motherboard). However, when putting it together again, they forgot the screw that fixates the DVD ROM... had to provide one myself. Facit: My girl friend bought a new notbook that was significantly more expensive than others, believing that Sony's support would be better than the support of no-name manufacturers. She ended up waiting 1.5 months for her notebook.. in the meantime, it had of course become significantly cheaper. I'm now thinking about buying an Apple Powerbook. Can anybody tell me about his experiences with Apple's support?

    --
    Georg
  42. I use a Vaio with SuSE 8.2 by jbuilder · · Score: 3, Insightful


    Have you *EVER* tried to load a different OS (as in what did not come originally on the system) nto a Sony Notebook?? You will tear your hair and generally feel like throwing out the notebook...
    /blockquote

    I use a Vaio with SuSE 8.2, and I feel your pain. For the most part my Vaio GRV550 has worked great. And while I'd *like* to get another Vaio and run SuSE on that, I probably won't. Sony makes good notebook PC's, but they don't make *great* ones. To say this new Vaio model could be a "Powerbook killer" is pretty dammed insulting to the Powerbook, considering some of the crap that Sony pulls with respect to incompatible hardware. Also, you're right, they're support is horid if you don't use the OS distro it shipped with.

    And the Centrio chip? How the hell could this vaio be a powerbook killer when the chip in it has essentially limited (read nonexistant) support for any non-MS OS (esp Linux).

    I'm sorry, Sony's going to have to do better or I'm going to look elsewhere - maybe IBM or Dell.

    --
    Polymorphism -- It's what you make of it.
  43. Re:3.11 Lbs by mindriot · · Score: 3, Informative

    1 pound = 453.59 g. Ergo, 3.11 pounds = 1.41 kg.

  44. My experience with Vaio has been miserable by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Vaios I have seen had what amounted their own version of Windows. They seem to have funky BIOS, hardware, and drivers. In my opinion, Windows Update slowly destroys the machine as these goofball drivers become less and less compatible with the new DLLs you get from Microsoft. I wonder if the word "Vaio" is perhaps Japanese for "disaster"? Sony makes alot of great products, but the Vaio is not one of them. Check Usenet; see just how satisfied the customers really are. Then buy some other brand, any other brand. You really can't do much worse.

    Vaios look cool, and we have a few PHBs who fell in love with the style and (lack of) weight, but they are a total nuisance for the support staff. Our travelling people occasionally gripe about the weight of their IBM Thinkpads, but at least they aren't calling headquarters with show-stopper events in the field.

  45. Apple Vs. Sony, price by price by UnixRevolution · · Score: 2, Informative

    the new sony:

    900MHz Centrino
    512MB Memory
    30GB Hard drive
    802.11b
    10.6" TFT
    3.11 Pounds
    ~$2000

    867MHz PowerPC G4
    640MB DDR266 (128MB built-in & 512MB SO-DIMM)
    40GB Ultra ATA drive
    SuperDrive (DVD-R/CD-RW)
    AirPort Extreme Card
    Keyboard/Mac OS for SuperDrive - U.S. English
    12.1-inch TFT Display
    $2048

    128MB more memory, 10GB more hard drive, faster processor (almost even on bare clock speed, even!) and has OS X with UNIX goodness out of the box, and a larger display by more than an inch. for about $48 more.

    and this is a powerbook killer how?

    sure, the apple is a bit heavier, but 4.6 pounds is still damn light. Also, do you think the sony really is going to last 7 hours on a battery? i know my 14" ibook has lasted more than 6.

    --
    You like your new Mac more than you like me, don't you, Dave? Dave? I asked...She said Yes.
  46. Apple cringes in fear... by Nijika · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Uh, yeah. It looks like a Powerbook, and it's 12", this obviously spells DOOM for the whole line. Right. Anyway, like between September and November probably, we're going to see more G5 products being rolled out, and I wouldn't be surprised if there's a Powerbook in there.

    Killer? We haven't seen the tip of the iceberg yet. Come 2004 I'll be posting from my 64 bit notebook. I'm sure I won't take a second look at this Sony after today.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  47. Re:Troll? by node+3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anti-zealot zealots are stupid.

  48. Re:3.11 Lbs by cosmo7 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No need for anything external except a flppy drive.
    and a paper tape punch/reader while you're at it.