Slashdot Mirror


Chinese "Dragon" Chip On Sale

mrseigen writes "The processor that Chinese firms have been working on as a response to foreign equipment and software is now available for pre-order. The Inquirer did an article here, and the company website is here. The chip will supposedly ship with Midori Linux."

554 comments

  1. I wonder... by Sir+Haxalot · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Is Midori Linux available in English?

    --
    I have over 70 freaks, do you?
    1. Re:I wonder... by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, as a quick look at the website would have told you, Mr.First Post.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  2. Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    It may not be a good idea to overclock these chips, as the dragons will most likely be hot enough as is...

    1. Re:Dragons by bsharitt · · Score: 1

      Speaking of overclocking. I wonder how fast these chips really are?

    2. Re:Dragons by tehanu · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Unlikely, since Chinese dragons are associated with rain and water not fire.

      However, this brings up the problem of mixing water with electronics...

    3. Re:Dragons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean like in the bursting capacitors that came from Taiwan ?

  3. Use caution by egg+troll · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah but an hour after you install it, you want to order another one.

    --

    C - A language that combines the speed of assembly with the ease of use of assembly.
    1. Re:Use caution by roguerez · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it the speed of Basic or something along those lines?

    2. Re:Use caution by fermion · · Score: 1

      I thought that was only true for a wintel machine.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  4. namespace collision by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man, I can think of about 100 products or companies that are all named "Midori". Either people really like melon liqueur, or the rampant fanboyism really has to stop.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    1. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. "alittle". It does have a certain ring to it. I'll start using it alittle and see how it feels. Thanks!

    2. Re:namespace collision by Gareman · · Score: 5, Informative
      Midori is Japanese for "green", by the way. Nothing particularly special about the name.

      Try:

      Akai: Red Kuroi: Black Aoi: Blue Shiroi: White Murasaki: Purple

    3. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think it is interesting that they stick a (TM) after Midori on the website. I would think the liquer or some other company would have long ago gained ownership of that (or it would at least be a freely usable word).

    4. Re:namespace collision by strestout1 · · Score: 1

      actually i believe "Midori" is Japanese for Green, which is why the liquer is named that.

      --

      MartinWorld.Net
      Powered by R
    5. Re:namespace collision by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Duh...of course it is. I said fanboyism is the cause. And thanks for taking the opportunity to show off your knowledge of Japanese. You're so cool.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    6. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple Computer, Apple Pie Company, et cetera.

      Probably, someone does have a trademark with regard to liquor, but I doubt there's a pre-existing trademark in the market of Linux.

      Of course, if both companies merged, I'd so be using and drinking Midori Linux.

    7. Re:namespace collision by chiasmus1 · · Score: 1
      Akai: Red Kuroi: Black Aoi: Blue Shiroi: White Murasaki: Purple

      Names tend to not use the i on the end of some colors. Try these Linux distros:

      • Aka Linux - Red Linux
      • Kuro Linux - Black Linux
      • Ao Linux - Blue Linux
      • Shiro Linux - White Linux
      • Murasaki Linux - Purple Linux
      • Kiiro Linux - Yellow Linux
      • Chairo Linux - Brown Linux
      Murasaki and Midori are exceptions.
    8. Re:namespace collision by mcdrewski42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The TM can be for the logo, symbol, wording etc.

      In this case I would assume that they could not claim rights to the word (as posted above it's the Japanese word for Green), but to the presentation/logo of the word/mark.

      For example, if you check out one of Australia's largest banks, The Commonwealth Bank you will see that the 'mm' characters are glued together in the word. The word commonwealth can't be copyrighted, but the logo when the 'mm' is glued together like that can.

      --
      /* affect != effect */ void affect(int *thing,int effect) { *thing += effect; }
    9. Re:namespace collision by Party+Remover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're so cool.

      I don't know Japanese, so I thought it was pretty cool. Certainly cooler (and less common) than yet another grumpy hater who's got to have the last word...why couldn't you just take your Funny mod and call it a night?

    10. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Normaly you can get a trademark on a product name if the word isn't normaly associated with the type of product and isn't a description of the type of product. Since midori/green isn't a word normaly associated with operating systems, it shouldn't be an issue -- but if you tried to trademark 'multitasking' as the name of an OS, it would be. You also don't get a trademark for any use of the word, just one that applies to your industry or field. Liquer companies are unlikly to produce anything that might be confused with an OS, so that is unlikly to be a problem.

    11. Re:namespace collision by obsidian+head · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't you just hate when people give you information?

    12. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone with a sig as lame as yours has no business deciding who's cool and who isn't.

    13. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Always a reliable "I just took one semester of Nihongo (that's Japanese!)" Slashdot poster around when you need one.

    14. Re:namespace collision by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Other good generic Japanese words in corporate names -

      ??Kawa (or sometimes Gawa) - river
      ??Yama - mountain
      ??Hon - root or origin or book
      ??Ryu (or sometimes Hyu) - dragon
      ??Dai (or sometimes Tai) - big

    15. Re:namespace collision by sTavvy · · Score: 1

      Dead-set. I never noticed that before!! Interesting....

    16. Re:namespace collision by sTavvy · · Score: 1

      Dead set.
      I never noticed that before!
      Thanks for pointing it out!!

    17. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Commonwealth logo and the Midori logo are TM'd. However, in Midori's pages any time they say, "Midori", it is shortly followed by the TM symbol. This is not the case with Commonwealth. That was more of the direction I was heading...

    18. Re:namespace collision by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      That's not fully correct, the problem is that some colors in Japanese are adjectives, some are nouns, and some of the adjectives can be turned into nouns by leaving out the i.

      Aka - red (noun)
      Akai - red (adjective)

      Midori - green (noun)

      Now if you use the color as a descriptive term (the red building) you'd say

      'akai tatemono'

      but if you build a new word of which the color is a part like 'Redhouse' (doesn't really work with English but works with German btw). You'd call it e.g.

      'Akaya' (-ya being house/store). Or like 'kuroi' being black (as adjective), but the beer from a well-known brewery in Japan calls it's black label beer 'kuro-raberu'. This makes it a new compound noun.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    19. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't just products and companies, there is also a porn star named Midori.

    20. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, Midori linux is a bit green (MidoriTM Linux 1.0.0-beta3)

    21. Re:namespace collision by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Man, I can think of about 10,000 products that are all use "X" prominently. Either people really like porn, or the rampant fanboyism really has to stop.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Man, I can think of about 100 products or companies that are all named "Midori". Either people really like melon liqueur, or the rampant fanboyism really has to stop. ...
      Midori is Japanese for "green", by the way
      "

      It's not like people would be unoriginal enough to say, name 18 operating systems after a common transparent architectural feature.

    23. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alien: What's that?

      Scotty: It's Midori.

      Doesn't quite flow as nicely.

    24. Re:namespace collision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Youch. Not exactly trying to stimulate western sales. Obviously, not a good marketing move. That's like a selling a "Nova" in a spanish speaking country. Or a car named "Lemon" in the US.

      I wouldn't want to buy a "green" cpu, as in just off the block, untested.

  5. Midori -- Stale Distro? by jalexand · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why would they ship with a linux distro that hasn't been updated in two years?

    1. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by denny_d · · Score: 1

      I was wondering the same thing... but maybe midori could be replaced with a diff. v. of linux? I'm not familiar with the technology but can't you flash a Chip with a different OS?

    2. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Rational+Nerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      The way I read the article they are using the Midori distro because of the support for written Chinese (not specific on the dialect).

    3. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Why what's wrong with it?
      massacre@tiananmen:~$ slocate free-speech
      massacre@tiananmen:~$ ping slashdot.org
      ping: unknown host slashdot.org
      massacre@tiananmen:~$ netstat -a | grep tcp
      tcp 0 0 *:X11 *:* LISTEN
      tcp 213.45.12.168:47346 213.45.12.1:government_censorship ESTABLISHED
      massacre@tiananmen:~$
    4. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 4, Interesting
      they are using the Midori distro because of the support for written Chinese (not specific on the dialect)

      When dealing with the Chinese written language, dialect is more or less irrelevant. The only issue is whether to support 'traditional' or 'simplified' Chinese characters. In mainland China, simplified characters (introduced when the communists took control) is usually desired. In Taiwan and elsewhere, traditional characters are usually employed. When using Unicode, this is almost entirely a font issue. When using older doublebyte character sets, the appropriate encoding system must be supported. I am not absolutely certain, but I think Midori supports everything commonly used.

    5. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by El · · Score: 1

      Uh, maybe because it takes two years to translate a distro to Chinese?

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    6. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Rational+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Ah, you have exposed my ignorance. I have no experience with written Chinese and jumped to the conclusion that is similar to verbal.
      Thanks for the information.

    7. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by sniggly · · Score: 1

      And the small memory footprint / optimized nature. It's a pretty tight distro, very good for older hardware.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    8. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by zby · · Score: 1

      Displaying the characters is only part of the problem. The other part is the input of them - and this is much more complicated and less standard.

    9. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      Displaying the characters is only part of the problem. The other part is the input of them - and this is much more complicated and less standard

      Yes, you are right. I should have mentioned the IME issue.

    10. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by shaggie · · Score: 1

      Actually since we are talking about China here, there is really only 1 major input system for it far as I am concerned.

      Romanization IME aka PinYin.

      But if you take into account all the other formats then we have the following iirc

      Zu Yin
      Chang Jie
      Da Yi
      Bu Shou

      I think you can also use input based on code assigned to a character.

      I think since this is a China machine, having Pin Yin IME is more than sufficient since anyone who went to school is taught Pin Yin, not as accurate as Zu Yin but then only the traitorous taiwanese dogs use Zu Yin! =P

      And I think anyone who did not go to school or is literate probably does not know how to use a computer anyways.

    11. Re:Midori -- Stale Distro? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter - it's not like you couldn't just put Slackware or *BSD on it, right? The main thing is, the Chinese have a home-grown processor that's good enough to run anything they might want to run. Good for them! And, good for us, too -- it'll give us an alternative to all the DRM crapola the MPAA/RIAA is trying to push. Let's see Wintel try and sell Palladium when you can get a cheap Dragon chip at any self-respecting computer show! Most of the vendors I've seen at the shows in my town are either Chinese or Taiwanese. They've got great stuff, too, gadgets galore. They're SURE to start selling this. I bet they all have it by the end of the year, summer 2004 at the latest.

      Cool.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  6. The case sticker!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh man! It's gonna say "Enter the Dragon" isn't it!!!

    1. Re:The case sticker!! by KReilly · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I would buy just for the sticker! Seriously though, they do have a way better naming scheme then intel and amd...
      It just sounds cool.
      "So Whats in your rig?"
      "A dragon.."

      If nothing else, we should see the sales in these shirts go up halfling

    2. Re:The case sticker!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that phrase is copyrighted. But then, that doesn't apply in China.

    3. Re:The case sticker!! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like Via's scheme...

      a) What's in the rig?
      b) Oh, C4.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:The case sticker!! by jkrise · · Score: 1

      Oh man! It's gonna say "Enter the Dragon" isn't it!!!

      No... it's gonna say "Dragon Inside"

      -

      --
      If you keep throwing chairs, one day you'll break windows....
    5. Re:The case sticker!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yyeee pied piper... and "They really like it" or "is it is it wicked"

      we luvin it, luvin it, luvin it!

    6. Re:The case sticker!! by Hellkitten · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's gonna say "Enter the Dragon" isn't it!!!

      Yep, and on smp boxes it's gonna show the edge of an old map and in the white unexplored areas it's gonna say "Here be dragons"

      --
      - We are the slashdot. Resistance is futile. Prepare to be moderated -
  7. Sure i'll buy one by zephc · · Score: 5, Funny

    but only if the money is used to torture political dissidents

    [/joke-notice-for-the-humorless]

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    1. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Bendy+Chief · · Score: 3, Informative
      Free Tibet

      In this context, your post is a little funny, but the flagrant abuses of Tibet that China has perpetrated since the 1950s are inexcusable. The fact that China is even allowed NEAR the United Nations is a gross mockery of justice.

      I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that one of North America's big trading partners uses techniques every bit as brutal and inhuman as Saddam Hussein's.

    2. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that one of North America's big trading partners uses techniques every bit as brutal and inhuman as Saddam Hussein's.

      Does Tibet have any oil?

    3. Re:Sure i'll buy one by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


      We're against torture here, aren't we? Best to hand your dissidents over to countries where "rigorous" interrogation techniques are acceptable, and keep your hands clean. Kinda.

      T&K.

      --
      Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
    4. Re:Sure i'll buy one by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You know, I'm not an expert on the subject by any means, so I'm asking and not telling; Is there any truth to the argument that things improved a lot in Tibet when the Chinese took over? I've been led to believe that under the feudal system previously dominating that nation, people weren't really doing all that well, either.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Informative
      let's get some facts out about tibet and china before anything gets out of hand:
      • tibet was a province of china until 1911. it was a sovereign nation for 39 years before the 1950 invasion by the pla
      • tibet was not, during that time or before a democracy... or even anything remotely like one
      • tibet was, in fact, an oligarchical theocracy before the invasion. over 90% of the population were "landless serfs" which basically means "plantation slave".
      • the reasons for the 1950 invasion by the pla were threefold: 1) to acquire strategic position between pro-western india and china at the height of the cold war 2) to regain the territory of 1911 3) to liberate the 90% of the population from slavery with what was seen as then as a pro-people ideology (maoism) - remember, the chinese revolution itself was very young and idealistic at that time.
      • after the initial invasion, the dali lama was allowed to keep his existing position and control and send a delegation to beijing. this lasted until the dali lama encouraged his followers to rise up against the pla in 1959. dali lama had to have known that this uprising was doomed to failure, massive deaths of tibetans and resulting repercussions.
      • the chinese government has spent an enormous amount of money on the modernization of tibet - roads, schools, industry an airport.
      • one of the primary changes china made to tibet was land reform. peasants in china now are owner/operators of their own farms and not slaves as they were under the theocracy before the invasion
      • reng rong, the general in charge of the tibet occupation was sacked in 1979 for incompetence. he had failed to bring tibet up to the standard beijing had desired.

        no point. just some facts. a refreshing change of pace for slashdot.

    6. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least America doesn't PAY for them to be brutal and inhuman, like it does Israel for example.

    7. Re:Sure i'll buy one by cshoes · · Score: 1


      Peter: Free Tibet? I'll take it.
      *going to pay phone*
      Peter: Hello, China? I have something you may want, but it's gonna cost you. That's right, all the tea..

    8. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, but Saddam doesn't make campain contributions, does he?

    9. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, and Hitler built the Autobahn. So what?

      All of the statements above are true, but it is also true that the oligarchal theocracy of the Dalai Llama never had anyone killed for trying to leave the country.

      Also, you omitted the overriding reason for the invasion of Tibet: Mao needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in agricultural policy, which was killing millions of chinese through starvation.

      Far better to gloat about how the Tibetans were "liberated" (and gloss over the fact that the subjects of the Mao Dynasty were just as much enslaved as the Tibetans had ever been), than to let people talk about how many villages had been wiped out by the PLA for having the affrontery to try to keep enough of their harvest to stay alive for another year.

      Mao was a very lucky thug. He was not a Great Man,but just a long-winded cuthroat at the right place and the right time to beat Stalin's record.

      You left-wing whiners sure like to cut history's greatest mass-murderer a lot of slack, don't you?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    10. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Is there any truth to the argument that things improved a lot in Tibet when the Chinese took over?

      Depends on what you mean by "improved". They've got more roads, schools, and other infrastructure now, but Tibetans are far more likely to get thrown in jail and deliberately infected with tuberculosis than they were under the Dalai Llama.

      The schools teach reading, math, and science, but the propaganda they pass off as history is rather more blatantly false than you get in most western countries.

      There is also the fact that the roads were built largely by prisoners who had comitted no act that a decent person would consider a crime..

      Better? It's all a matter of how you look at it, isn't it?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:Sure i'll buy one by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that one of North America's big trading partners uses techniques every bit as brutal and inhuman as Saddam Hussein's.

      Is that Saddam Hussein with or without USA's help? Saddam Hussein probably killed more people with USA's help in the late 80's/early 90's than without USA's help. Granted, it just proves that Saddam is a brutal dictator... however, it shoots down your comparison...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    12. Re:Sure i'll buy one by uradu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Yeah, and Hitler built the Autobahn.

      I was thinking "what did the Romans ever do for us?" You're right on the spot there, even though I'm sort of a "left-wing" (non)whiner. Another question to ask is: what does it matter what you did for them, if the Tibetans don't want you?

    13. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enter the sound (and smell) of money and greed:
      Take those "Made in China" stickers off those boxes so our "KKK" Kustomers won't be offended when they choose "our" product because of it's price and price alone.
      Explanation? Sure:
      Down South (USA) good old KKK types have been too busy with "meetings" to learn a decent craft or trade, so they don't have much money to spend when things break down and spare parts are needed. So, "Made in China" here we come, and Bosses in such establishments order the employees to Take those "Made in China" Stickers off the boxes.

    14. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 1

      For what very little it's worth, Tibet at various times over the last ~1500 years has been a part of China, semi-autonomous, tributary, separate sovereign nation(s), been invaded by Mongols, Gurkhas, Chinese, British, been a major regional power, and has successfully invaded China. Where's the cutoff point in looking at history to decided whether Tibet is independent or instead is as much of a part of China as Manchuria (or at least Xinjiang or maybe even Tiawan) is? Or to what extent does the history matter?

    15. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Frymaster · · Score: 1
      what does it matter what you did for them, if the Tibetans don't want you?

      1. as i stated, my post was to make no point. the sole objective was to get some cards on the table because in many cases of national liberation struggle, and espescially in the tibet issue, there is a lot misunderstanding and ignorance of history. your point, however, is pretty much spot on.

      2. the "whiner" thing is a mild exercise in irony.

      3. for the record, i think the occupation of tibet is Bad Thing. i am most definitely not an apologist for mao. when i say left wing i refer more to something along the lines of this.

    16. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Doc_Gabriel · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you right-wing whiners seem to forget another slaughter: the holocaust. I am not at all defending Chairman Mao, but there is an old danish proverb, which says (roughly translated): "You shouldn't be throwing stones, if you live in a house made of glass" =)

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one"
    17. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Wait some years until we forget about the recent (3 mo) facts.

      Then talk about invasions.

      |Right-wing idiot| = |Left-wing idiot|

    18. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know what's creepy? Check this out:

      Also, you omitted the overriding reason for the invasion of Iraq: Bush needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in economic policy, which was killing millions of American through puverty.

      Far better to gloat about how the Iraqis were "liberated" (and gloss over the fact that the subjects of the US imperalism were just as much enslaved as the Iraqis had ever been), than to let people talk about the actual uncertain state of Iraq

      Bush was a very lucky thug. He was not a Great Man,but just a long-winded cuthroat at the right place and the right time to beat everybody's record.

      your left-winger statment is just dumb. No comment

    19. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      Yes, and you right-wing whiners seem to forget another slaughter: the holocaust.

      For the record: Hitler was a socialist. The attempts by other socialists to distance themselves from his particular brand of socialism do not change the fact.

      Also, for the record: I am not a right-winger, I am a hard-line libertarian.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    20. Re:Sure i'll buy one by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So in other words, Tibet is now less medieval and more like (insert major world power here.) I was gonna say the US but it's not like any other nation is any different when they think they're acting in the interests of their survival. (Obviously, a minority of people acting without [adequate] oversight are in control of the really screwed up things.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bush needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in economic policy, which was killing millions of American through puverty

      Killing millions of Americans through poverty?

      That's horrible! Something would have to be done about that, if it weren't for the fact that you just made it up.

      While I have my qualms about Bush's administration, I will still point out that a diatribe like the one you posted above does a piss-poor job of answering any real concerns. Pretending that Bush == Mao is asinine.

      (Yeah, I object to getting searched at an airport, but comparing it to mass murder is the kind of hyperbole that makes it easy for the proponents of Ashcroft's program to dismiss any objectors as irresponsible.)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    22. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler was not a socialist. He was right wing. Fascism is the final stage of liberalism.

    23. Re:Sure i'll buy one by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Oooh, hitler this, hitler that...

      I'm so sick of the hitler whinging. Christ... Hitler was not a nice guy. He killied a lot of people for dumb reasons. But he was no Stalin by any means. And we can be quite sure if Hitler had not stepped on some toes, a lot more people today would be speaking russian.

      Remember kids... Hitler.... It's YOUR fault!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    24. Re:Sure i'll buy one by dmiller · · Score: 3, Funny

      Also, you omitted the overriding reason for the invasion of Tibet: Mao needed to divert the attention of his subjects from his incompetence in agricultural policy, which was killing millions of chinese through starvation.

      Heaven help us if our governments start unnecessary wars to distract us from domestic issues!

    25. Re:Sure i'll buy one by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      Would you then care to explain why Hitler's first order of business was to imprison/execute every communist in Germany? Hitler had an immense support from the liberal/conservative parties, mostly because of his antisocialistic views.

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    26. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tibet was a province of china until 1911

      Liar. I've got a map from the 1800s, and it shows Tibet as a separate country.

    27. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Bush so far has not commited mass murder in the US. Of course nobody really knows how many people he killed in iraq and afghanistan because the US military is very adept at hiding those things.

      To be fair though Bush just got started. He has yet to invade Iran and syria and will mostly likely kills lots of north koreans too.

      Give the man some time, before he is done he may yet kill a million people or two.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    28. Re:Sure i'll buy one by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Going back to the early days of Tibet, they were at several points in history a major, aggressive threat to China. Genghis Khan actually set aside Tibet as holy land, and the Ming Chinese accepted Buddhism and the Tibetan Buddhism in particular, and respected Tibet as a spiritual home and holy land.

      I suppose, if you must blame somebody for the state Tibet is in today it would be the European countries that destabilized imperial China in the 19th and early 20th centuries. Then Marx, then Mao.

    29. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better check your "facts."

      Tibet has been an independent country (even an empire at times) in Central Asia since about 1000 BCE. Tibet was taken over by the Chinese with help from the British in 1904. Go read up on Col. Younghusband's expedition. Basically, Tibet got caught in the middle of the "Great Game" between the British Indian Empire and the expansionist Russian Czars. The Chinese persuaded the Brits that Tibet was theirs. The Brits were happy to go along because the Chinese were a friendly semi-puppet of the West as a result of the Opium Wars. Tibet appeared to be talking with the Russian Czar, something the Brits could not tolerate. Tibet threw out the Chinese and restored their sovereignty after the Chinese revolution of 1911.

      It was the CIA which was at least partly responsible for the 1959 problems. They were smuggling guns into Tibet with the help of the Nepalese. But giving guns to people who have such a reverence for life that they don't want to harm earthworms while digging irrigation trenches is not exactly a recipe for a successful revolution.

      The Chinese did a rather thorough job of destroying Tibetan culture during the Cultural Revolution. Most of the monasteries were sacked, libraries burned, etc. Anyone trekking on the North side of Mt Everest can see the remnants of the Rongbuk Monastery for themselves. The Tibetans were forced to grow wheat in place of their native barley resulting in a bad famine during the 1960s[1]. The Chinese are currently moving large numbers of non-Tibetans into Tibet in order to reinforce their claims to Tibet by eventually dwarfing the native population.

      Yes, Tibet was an oligarchical theocracy before the Chinese invaded. Funny how the senior lamas always seemed to be reincarnated into the upper crust families. But that is true today, too. Its just that the oligarchy is living in Bejing and the theology is now Communism (or whatever is left of it). Meet the new boss, same as the old boss...

      Oh, and India was one of the leaders of the Non-Aligned Movement, quite friendly with the Soviet Union and not all that pro Western. In fact Nehru thought that India and China had a lot in common and was quite shocked when Mao took some strategic hills from India a few years after China conquered India.

      [1] If you ever get into the Himalayas, check out the native barley beer known as chang. It is unfiltered, so you'll find the dregs floating in your cup. At 12,000+ ft altitudes it'll get you quite toasted quite fast.

    30. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      Bush so far has not commited mass murder in the US.

      So far, neither have you. Is there any reason why I should expect this to change?

      One president has in fact rounded up US citizens and put them in conentration camps for no more cause than their race, and (surprise!) it was a democrat who did it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    31. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialist, give me break. Ever heard of Mussolini? Do you consider him a socialist too? You're worse then the average American by calling the "Axis of Evil" socialist in an effort so sound marginally more academic, as opposed to those who label the Axis communist in their ignorance. Give me a break. Despotism != communism. Your record was written by a cretin.

    32. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wrote an incredibly useful manual for the American media: Mein Kamf

    33. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "So far, neither have you. Is there any reason why I should expect this to change?"

      Bush has killed lots of afghanis and iraqis. I haven't killed anybody. Bush is talking like he is going to kill iranians and syrians I have never said anything like that.

      "One president has in fact rounded up US citizens and put them in conentration camps for no more cause than their race, and (surprise!) it was a democrat who did it."

      Bush did it too. There are at least three concentration camps that I am aware of. One in cuba, one in afghanistan, and one in quatar. These are all filled with muslims.

      I don't know what is going on in any of them (damn I wish I lived in a country with a free press) but I do know that the one in cuba consisted of cells made out of chain link. They were about the size of a typical dog kennel you might buy at your local hardware store.

      Say what you want about hitler he at least provided walls for his prisoners.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    34. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would you then care to explain why Hitler's first order of business was to imprison/execute every communist in Germany?

      Woah, I guess you got me there! If Hitler killed communists, then he couldn't have been a socialist, huh?

      Wrong.

      Actually, killing the pinkos wasn't his first order of business, it's just that attacking the communists was a pretty easy sell at the time. (Just like it was easier to sell the idea of euthanasia of the handicapped, before gearing up for genocide.)

      Russia had been under Lenin, and then Stalin's yoke for quite a while by that point, and any idiot could see that communism was a Very Bad Idea.

      The reason that Hitler wanted the communists eliminated, is that they were a rival to his own brand of socialism. Communism and fascism both preached the supremacy of the collective (be it the Volk or the Proletariat) over the individual, and exhorted the unfortunate residents of the lands they siezed in their respective putsches to willingly die for the Führer and the Vaterland in the case of Germany, or for Stalin and the Rodina in the case of Russia.

      You may also take note, that religious zealots are generally more vicious with the heretic than the infidel. Heretics, being closer to one's own way, are more likely to win converts, and are thus a greater threat than out-and-out heathens. It's entirely normal for variants of one kind of institutionalized insanity (like the Nazis and the Commies) to be at each other's throats.

      Hitler's support among non-socialists, I attribute to desperation. Germany was in complete economic collapse, and the people were willing to turn to any vicious little thug who promised to get a lid on it all.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    35. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ... and Israel is demolishing Palestinian houses on Palestinian land so that they can build the Berlin Wall #2.

      Israel, which is defended by the US at all cost.

    36. Re:Sure i'll buy one by bigmattana · · Score: 1

      Hitler was about as far from an American conservative as you can get. I don't know anyone who would support Hitler, either conservative or liberal. (The only possible thing he had in common was a relatively higher level of nationalism.) And I sure as hell don't know anyone who wants to cover up what Hitler did, like liberals (Walter Duranty anyone?) do with the evil communist states in history. This just sickens me. Why bring up Hitler (not that we shouldn't) when Tibet is STILL being oppressed (torture anyone?), just like Taiwain. I used to live with four Taiwanese students, and they all wished our country would support them more, being a free, independent nation, instead of being China's bitch. Their parents continually worry every time China fires missles their way pretending they are just testing them. Why did I not even hear about Stalin's massacres until I was 21, when I had Hitler's life history drilled into me since I was in grade school? And I would venture say that over half of my friends in college have no idea about the whole Tibet ordeal.

    37. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Left-wing whiners cut Mao slack? Left-wing whiners are the ones with a "Free Tibet" bumper sticker on their car.

      The point is, China does indeed have a bad human-rights record. China might even be a villian in this case. However, people make Tibetans paragons of virtue, when their society was about as fucked up as you can get. I think Westerners (I'm a chink who moved to the US) are too quick to exoticize a remote locale with a primitive culture. There's no doubt, it's a shame that the culture can't more smoothly & gradually be brought up to more modern standards. However, how often in history has that happened? Indian reservations don't seem like the cheeriest place to live, China's certainly doing a better job than the US in that regard.

      Mao achieved greatness, and he certainly didn't have it thrust upon him - doesn't that make him great? But you obviously don't know shit that wasn't in the movie "Kundun," so why don't you keep your opinions to yourself?

    38. Re:Sure i'll buy one by shaggie · · Score: 1

      The Qing Dynasty destabilized themselves before the europeans came on the scene.

      Plus the manchus were considered barbarians by the ethnic chinese, whenever you have a non-native, minority in control, you'll always have instability. They should've taken a page from the US. Turn the non-native minority into a native majority and own the land =)

    39. Re:Sure i'll buy one by shaggie · · Score: 1

      mao achieved greatness????

      I wouldn't call it that... Its almost like saying Stalin achieved greatness, et al.

      mao has some viable valid contributions to China which cannot be denied. but his destructive acts is just as great if not greater than his achievements.

      cultural revolution, gang of four, red guards, etc.

      the consolation is that at least mao was more dedicated to defending the homeland from japanese invasion than the nationalists were.

      oh yeah as we are on this topic of holocaust.. why is it that everyone talks about the jewish holocaust and nobody talks about the chinese holocaust?

      I think the japanese buried alive more chinese in mass graves than the jews that hitler managed to kill. but than of course you can argue that it really wasn't a holocaust for the chinese.... a billion more where that came from =)

    40. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1


      Bush has killed lots of afghanis and iraqis.

      He'd have to kill many, many more to come close to the number of Afghans murdered by the Taliban, or Iraqis murdered by the Ba'ath regeime.

      It's a sad thing that people died in those wars, but sometimes, you just have to do what it takes to remove a tyrant.

      There are at least three concentration camps that I am aware of. One in cuba, one in afghanistan, and one in quatar. These are all filled with muslims.

      Correction: there are three camps where POWs are being held. The difference is that not one of the Japanese Americans that FDR imprisoned comitted any act of agression against their fellow citizens.

      Say what you want about hitler he at least provided walls for his prisoners.

      Gosh, aren't you cute?

      Really, this overblown rhetoric just makes you easy to dismiss.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    41. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You gotta defend Israel, or the entire population of Hollywood will rise up and otherthrow the Government.

    42. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      I don't buy your insinuation that the Reds were acting for their survival by invading Tibet. It was a flat-out land grab, not justifiable in any way.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    43. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what was that document thingy again?

      THE GENEVA FUCKING CONVENTION?

    44. Re:Sure i'll buy one by HarmlessScenery · · Score: 1
      There is also the fact that the roads were built largely by prisoners who had comitted no act that a decent person would consider a crime..
      I can see it now ....

      The Kazaa strip.
      Napster Highway.

      :)
    45. Re:Sure i'll buy one by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

      So basically the chinese are "liberating" the Tibet american style?

      I don't bite. Tibet has the right to evolve to a democracy without being assimilated by China, losing all their roots and culture.

    46. Re:Sure i'll buy one by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      Does Tibet have any oil?

      Did Tibet make a mockery of the president's father? [gulf://1991]

    47. Re:Sure i'll buy one by epgandalf · · Score: 1
      Heaven help us if our governments start unnecessary wars to distract us from domestic issues!


      Or bomb Sudan and Afghanistan at places at places known not to contain terrorists on the same day that Monica Lewinsky testifies before a Grang Jury so as to get her out of the news?

    48. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Correction: there are three camps where POWs are being held.

      POWs get the Geneva convention, but Bush calls these people "Illegal Combatants." What's that all about? I am not muslim, nor do I have sympathy for either the Taliban or Iraqi regimes, but you can't start a war with a regime, and then persecute your opponents infantry (many of whom were coerced into their roles) just for being on the losing side, especially when you don't seem able to actually find the enemy.

      Thankfully Tony Blair managed to take a stand against Bush on the British citizens in Guantanamo Bay (because his electorate demanded it). Its just a shame not enough people in the USA care enough about their citizens who are also being held there to make Bush take notice.

    49. Re:Sure i'll buy one by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      That asprin factory was full of terrorists, they were just invisible.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    50. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      I agree. It's dangerous to forget the difference between representative government and dictatorship, but it is easy to blur the line when the dictator is acting well and the representatives are acting poorly. I got called into a room several times while I was in Beijing to be told the limits of my freedom in the PRC. Things looked fine and free there until you crossed that invisible line.
      My my JieJie*'s brother had his leg blown off in TianAnMen after I had left. *JieJie means older sister, but she was just a close friend for years.

    51. Re:Sure i'll buy one by egommer · · Score: 1

      What the hell does a politcal Anit-semtic -Anti-US rant have to do with an new Chip from China? Then get's a 5 for insightful? Please.

      Slashdot seems to be de-generating into an Political venting Indymedia type website and becoming less and less of a geek forurm. If you want to talk political venome go to Indymedia and join the Jew/America hater there.

      This comment should be offtopic and troll. Isightful my ass!

      --
      Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
    52. Re:Sure i'll buy one by scrytch · · Score: 1

      > You left-wing whiners sure like to cut history's greatest mass-murderer a lot of slack, don't you?

      Strange.. I don't see a lot of Bush bumper stickers alongside the "Free Tibet" ones. Did I miss a meeting recently?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    53. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Correction: there are three camps where POWs are being held."

      POW?

      US of A has repeatedly denied them POW status.

    54. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Having objections to what the occupant nation of Israel is doing is NOT anti-semitic, for two reasons:

      *) Arabs are semites
      *) I have nothing against the jewish people, I do care about what the state of Israel is doing though

      ... until you learn to separate "Opinions on Israel" with "Anti-semitic rantings" I suggest you stay away from any discussions on the matter.

    55. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "He'd have to kill many, many more to come close to the number of Afghans murdered by the Taliban, or Iraqis murdered by the Ba'ath regeime."

      Like I said give him time. I know that right now he is less evil then the taliban because the number of people he killed is less then the taliban but I am sure he will catch up and be just as evil.

      "Correction: there are three camps where POWs are being held."

      These people are not POWs. The US does not recognize them as such. Also they are not on US soil. US is free to do whatever it wants to them because they are acting outside US law, UN mandates, and the geneva convention. As I said you and I are not allowed to know what is going in there but I imagine it's not pretty.

      "The difference is that not one of the Japanese Americans that FDR imprisoned comitted any act of agression against their fellow citizens."

      Same could be said for almost 100% of the so called illegal combatants.

      "Gosh, aren't you cute?

      Really, this overblown rhetoric just makes you easy to dismiss."

      facts are a bitch aren't they. You know you can't deny that the residents of our concentration camps are living in chain link cages smaller then the one your dog has. You know that it's wrong to do that. You know that even somebody as evil as hitler provided walls and beds for his prisoners.

      Knowing all that and being unable to argue against it you call me cute and choose to dismiss me.

      You can dismiss me all you want, it won't change the facts.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    56. Re:Sure i'll buy one by seney · · Score: 1

      This is true. Fuck Mao

      Read Mao's War Against Nature by Judith Shapiro.

      Anyone who supports the over-boiling of rice, in order to make it larger (absorbs more water, becomes the size of a marble) and more filling (which gives you that horrid disease when you intake too much water) which then leads to people starving and eating the bark off of trees, in order to make up for idiotic agro policies deserves to die on their photo-op-fake-ass swim across the yellow river.

    57. Re:Sure i'll buy one by egommer · · Score: 1

      The point was not whether I agree or disagree with expert polictal commentary views of Israel and the US State Department.

      The point is it's the wrong article forum for Political discussions. This article was about a China Made CPU chip.

      I have no idea how that relates to Israel and the State Department. I don't see the relationship. Explain it to me please.

      --
      Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
    58. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler wasn't a socialist and you know it. Logic chopping and trolling suck even more in combination so just give it a rest.

    59. Re:Sure i'll buy one by egommer · · Score: 1

      Troed,

      Also not that my reponse was not a peronal attack on your comments. This a free forum. You can post what ever you want. My remarks where directed more or less at the moderators who gave you a (5) for offtopic political commentary.

      If I post that Bill Clinton is a Nazi under a an article about Laptop batteries I would be expected to get -1 offtopic. But it's my freedom to do so. So I was not offened by what you wrote. I frankly, didn't even care.

      I'm just tring to figure out why you where modereated to a 5 is all.

      Regards,

      egommer

      --
      Two Towers-Two Worlds.One seeks triumphs and freedom for man.The other deems man unworthy and wrecks them.
    60. Re:Sure i'll buy one by greenrd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For the record: Hitler was a socialist. The attempts by other socialists to distance themselves from his particular brand of socialism do not change the fact.

      Sure... if you redefine the word socialist to be so broad that it includes a vast number of people not normally thought of as socialist. Your definition seems to be "putting the collective above the individual and encouraging people to die for their country". Well, first off, "encouraging people to go and die for their country" is not exactly an innovation. It's as old as the hills. It's not exactly a good distinguishing characteristic. What monarchy, dictatorship, democracy or totalitarian system hasn't tried to dupe its population with patriotism?

      Secondly, as for "putting the collective above the individual". If by that you mean putting the State above individual rights, sure, then Julius Caesar was a socialist, then notorious torturer General Pinochet was a socialist, then Dubya is a socialist.

      But that's simply fatuous. That definition is way too broad.

      If you mean putting the general welfare (i.e. the welfare of the whole population) above all individual rights, that's actually a self-contradictory definition! How can you assert that Hitler looked after the general welfare while persecuting the Jews, the communists, the gays, other political opponents, and generally striking fear into people's hearts?

      It would be like calling a govenor who regularly rounds up and shoots 1% of the population of a state, a "benevolent ruler". It's rubbish. That's not looking after the general welfare, it's tyrrany.

      For the same reason, I would argue that Stalin and Pol Pot, for example, were not socialists or communists, despite the fact that they used that kind of rhetoric.

      For a better definition, I would refer you to the MSF:

      "The Movement for a Socialist Future unites all those who oppose the rule of the global corporations and "Third Way" governments like New Labour. We support all those fighting injustice, people struggling everywhere for cultural independence, self-determination and diversity and in defence of the environment. We campaign for a new, not-for-profit society based on co-operation not competition, with mass democratic control of the economy and the state."
      That, in a nutshell, is what contemporary socialism is all about. It's not terribly complicated. Hitler, as the leader of a racist, far-right-wing political party, was the very opposite of socialist.

      I could also say "Hitler was a conservative. That's a fact."... if I define "conservative" as "racist bigot". You can say anything you like if you redefine the words... but that's not a very convincing form of argument.

    61. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar. I've got a map from the 1800s, and it shows Tibet as a separate country.

      Sure, but who drew the map?

    62. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 1

      Because people aren't like you, shouting "ANTI-SEMITE!" when it's not appropriate - they appreciate information even though the topic might be about something else.

      (And, the thread had already begun discussing politics long before my post. You only saw "ANTI-SEMITE!" though, which says a lot about you .. )

    63. Re:Sure i'll buy one by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Whether or not it was anti-semetic (I didn't see it as such), his point was that it was off topic.

    64. Re:Sure i'll buy one by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      None of this justifies the Chinese denial of Tibetan self-determination.

    65. Re:Sure i'll buy one by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      that's a moronic assertion you haven't even tried to justify.

      Rohm and other elements of the early Nazi party were "socialist" in some senses of the word (as in believing in redistribution of wealth and state control of industry, both in the interests of the working class).

      To see what Hitler thought of Rohm's social views, you may want to look up the Night of the Long Knives.

    66. Re:Sure i'll buy one by AME · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I do care about what the state of Israel is doing though

      But you don't seem to care about what the state of Palestine is doing.

      I don't wish to take sides here, but I wonder: How many times would they have to blow up public markets and schoolbusses full of children in your country before you and yours would be calling for their annihilation?

      Honestly, the fact that most Isrealis are only calling for unilateral separation (the Berlin Wall 2, as you put it) is pure benevolence in my opinion.

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
    67. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 1

      When Israel has stopped occupying Palestinian land, stopped shooting Palestinian kids in the head unprovoced - and stopped demolishing Palestinian homes .. THEN .. then we'll see if Palestinians still feel the need to defend themselves the only way they can (they're not backed by the US military you know).

    68. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      I am sure he will catch up and be just as evil.

      I'm sure you're an idiot.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    69. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      Time will tell.

      By my rough calculations Bush has been responsible for the deaths of around 100,000 people. Of course I can't really back these numbers up because I don't live in a country in which the military is held accountable for it's actions. It would be wonderful if the US military actually told the people how many people they killed or if the press was free to investigate and report these numbers.

      I figure that the US military is a very efficient and accurate killing machine. That it probably only errs 1% of the time and does "collateral damage". So I calculate that for every civilian it kills it kills a hundred other human beings who are classified as "enemy". Knowing that this is pure speculation I also then cut my number by a 4 or five just to be conservative.

      So in afghanistan us killed over three thousand civilians, which means they probably killed three hundred thousand combatants. If you want to be conservative drivide that by four or five.

      Add the iraqi numbers and you'll find out that Bush is responsible for the deaths of at least a hundred thousand human beings at most maybe a million.

      There's your hero, the mass murderer.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    70. Re:Sure i'll buy one by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      How are suicide bombers aganst civilian targets a form of defense?

    71. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      I don't live in a country in which the military is held accountable for it's actions.

      What, you live in Syria? I had assumed that you were in the USA, like myself.

      Here's a tip: do a google search for "Lt. William Calley", and then try to tell us that the US military isn't held accountable for its actions.

      The USA is one of the very few countries on earth where the military is held accountable.

      BTW, making numbers up off the top of your head doesn't support your position at all.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    72. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's their _only_ way of "fighting back". When you don't have the newest weapons the US can supply you with (as Israel has) you don't have much choice. It's a moot point though - Israel is the invader and aggressor. Israel is in no position to state any demands on the Palestinian people THEY OPPRESS until they've stopped occupying their land.

      (PS: How's shooting civilian journalists "defense"? Look up what the IDF is, and what they do regularly)

    73. Re:Sure i'll buy one by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 1

      I didn't say anything in defense of the IDF. Suicide bombers are NOT fighting back however. It's just cowardly terrorism.

    74. Re:Sure i'll buy one by ffatTony · · Score: 1

      The USA is one of the very few countries on earth where the military is held accountable.

      Come now.... the US military is held accountable in as much as when forced to admit they did something wrong due to an overwhelming amount of evidence, public opinion, and a threat to funding they will select a scapegoat (read: no longer useful high ranking officer) who will be reprimanded (read: dishonerable discharge with no real punishment and most likely quite generous severence pay (read: bribe))

      As a US citizen, I do not believe my coutry has ever had my interests at heart and its brute squad is not something I care to side with either.

    75. Re:Sure i'll buy one by Troed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You give the same weapons to the Palestinians that the US is giving Israel and I promise you they'll use those instead doing suicide bombings.

      (As a sitenote, Arafat has said the same thing)

    76. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      Your study of history is sadly lacking.

      Let me fill you in on another thing that you obviously don't know. All US military personnel are aware that if given an illegal order, they 1) don't have to follow it, 2) have a duty to report the illegal order up the chain of command, and 3) are entitled to place the officer giving the illegal order under arrest if they deem it necessary.

      Compare this to most other countries, where soldiers are expected to follow every order, legal or not.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    77. Re:Sure i'll buy one by ffatTony · · Score: 1

      It seems clear to me that you sir are an idealist and I am the cynic. I must admit I am little envious of your willingness to believe but all in all I suppose we'll just have to agree to disagree as this thread has become long, tedious, and painfully off topic. Good day.

    78. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      It seems clear to me that you can't be bothered with facts that fail to support your need to hate your country.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    79. Re:Sure i'll buy one by jcr · · Score: 1

      To see what Hitler thought of Rohm's social views, you may want to look up the Night of the Long Knives.

      You may want to do a bit of your own reading on hitler's first betrayal of his own followers.

      Hitler had no issue with Rohm's social views. He had the SA's leadership done in because that was the deal the army demanded before they'd allow him to become chancellor.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  8. China is enormous by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    And will be an enormous economic force in years to come.

    If they reduce their reliance on foreign IP (or non-free foreign IP) as well as foreign hardware, this can only be good for China, and only be bad for us (Less money flow into the IT industry) unless they produce a higher quality product (thus improving the industry).

    However, in the short term, you know, MS won't make as much money, neither will Intel, and I'm sure a lot of /.ers are really happy about that.

    --
    The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    1. Re:China is enormous by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MS won't make as much money, neither will Intel, and I'm sure a lot of /.ers are really happy about that.

      Many /.ers are blissfully unaware that they can buy $400 "boxen" thanks to Microsoft. That's how much Windows has commoditized the hardware markets. Of course, if Wintel gets into trouble then... no more cheap "boxen" to run Linux or BSD. Everyone will look back at the wonderful days of the "Microsoft tax" if that happens.

    2. Re:China is enormous by Dr.Hair · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Less money may flow in to the US IT industry or North American IT industry.

      Adding a new player in to the chip industry means that MORE money as a whole will flow in to the global IT industry. And then there is support and the rest of the follow-ons to the chip fabrication, which will produce new opportunities for revenue for the IT industry, including North America and Europe, if people choose to use the architecture.

    3. Re:China is enormous by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You oversimplify. But you are correct in too many ways for me to nitpick.

      A lot of factors have contributed to the $400 box, and Microsoft did so by arguably (and I say arguably only because this is /. and someone will argue with me) creating the PC market as it is now. AMD helped by giving Intel some real competition as well.

      All of the people who own PC's, MS, the marketing juggernaut pushed for that. One of the good things they did for the industry that few here recognize (either willingly or out of blind hatred). Anyone who remembers how expensive hardware was wayyy back in the day, knows this.

      The more demand, the cheaper the products can be produced and the more competition.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    4. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering the base software is GPL'd, they'll never be able to produce a superior product because they'll be forced to share any advances they make with their customers. And since the only advantages I can see "Dragon" having are price, NSA-free, and DRM-free, American companies will be forced to minimize those advantages by reducing profiteering and not helping third parties spy on their customers.

      Can you remind me again why this is bad for us?

    5. Re:China is enormous by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Which means in the ways that count they will be producing a superior product if there is demand for a low cost NSA-free, DRM-free chip. There most definately is.

      So, excellent point Mr. AC. I wish I could mod you up.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    6. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      US Gov't strategy to keep China from global economic superpower:
      1) Dragon chips could be used in WMD.
      2) Regime change in China.
      3) Install Democratic Government, selected by the people (read gov't that agrees with US).
      4) Profit.

    7. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > Many /.ers are blissfully unaware that they can buy $400 "boxen" thanks to Microsoft.

      Many MS lovers are quite unaware of History. Wait, make that most US people totally ignore History.

      The fact is that there was cheap computing before Microsoft. Several flavors of it, at that: CP/M which MS cloned, Sinclair, TRS-80... each had a thriving market with several vendors, and the CP/M had quite a MS-like effect of commoditising hardware.

      What IBM, not MS, did with the PC was to create a middle ground between toy microcomputers and midrange computers that was powerful enough to run real numbers in it, and respectable enough to be bought for office usage.

      One can argue that, were MS honest, it would have persisted in migrating its MS-DOS users to Xenix, and we'd have better quality systems today, perhaps even faster, perhaps even cheaper, perhaps simply more reliable. Even without MS being honest, the Unix vendors could have made it had they stopped trying to pull proprietary lock-in on their customers. There is no reason to believe that MS alone gave us commodity systems.

      Not to mention cheap boxes are usually trash. I'd rather have a FireWire, SCSI, USB, PostScript system than a USB, IDE, PS/2, PCL system anytime...

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    8. Re:China is enormous by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Adding a new player in to the chip industry means that MORE money as a whole will flow in to the global IT industry.

      You hope so, but that's only if they create new demand. Otherwise they fizzle and we get a minor boom+bust in asia, little-affecting the world.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:China is enormous by desenz · · Score: 1

      So would all of the rest of us. But if you need some cheap computers, you can get them.

    10. Re:China is enormous by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Many MS lovers are quite unaware of History

      Here we go.

      CP/M had quite a MS-like effect of commoditising hardware

      All of those were niche markets for hobby users. To argue anything else about them is dumb. Unless you "ignore history". Otherwise you'd be posting to Slashdot from a Commodore box (like Junis!)

      What IBM, not MS

      IBM? Nope. If we're talking hardware, that would be Compaq and all the other clone makers. It was Windows that created that synergy between incresingly cheap hardware and demand for a graphic OS. Unless you are still using Warp?

      One can argue that, were MS honest

      Spare me the party line, mmkay?

      There is no reason to believe that MS alone gave us commodity systems.

      You don't have to *believe* anything, all you need to do is look at what fueled the spread of those commodity systems you talk about. It was a crappy but workable OS called Windows. And I'm not cheering Microsoft because they gave me cheap boxes, I'm just happy that it happened. But that's *how* it happened.

      Not to mention cheap boxes are usually trash

      Millions of people disagree with you.

    11. Re:China is enormous by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Low hardware prices occur because of competition between hardware vendors combined with technology allowing cheap production. Macintosh and SunSparc were not more expensive because of some defect in the software they used. They were more expensive because the hardware was proprietary.

      IBM deserve credit for making the IBM PC an open standard plus making PCs credible in a business setting. Once that decision was made and Intel, AMD, IBM, Seagate and others produced inexpensive parts that IBM PCs could leverage, cheap PCs were going to happen.

      The only area where it can be argued Microsoft helped (by later having a desktop monopoly) was to make it easier, and thus a little cheaper, for peripheral suppliers who only needed to target drivers for one platform (except, of course, Windows has never been very compatible with Windows).

    12. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > All of those were niche markets for hobby users.

      Not only. Quite some people were seriously using VisiCalc and automating their routines with BASIC on CP/M before the IBM PC came around to give the whole thing business respectability and some additional horsepower.

      > To argue anything else about them is dumb.

      If you equate having more than 30 years, and having a memory at that, to being dumb...

      > If we're talking hardware, that would be Compaq and all the other clone makers.

      You sure have no historical and business perspective. The clone makers were already there with the CP/M, the i8080 and the Zylog z80. But it was the IBM PC that created the first big-time cloning opportunity. It was IBM's decision to create an "open" machine; MS only capitalised on it better, earlier and more ruthlessly than Digital Research.

      > It was Windows that created that synergy between incresingly cheap hardware

      Yes, sir. Typical MS weenie confusion of ideas, thinking there was no PC before MS Windows. Quite hopeless usually, but let's try...

      Seriously, hardware did get cheaper before MS Windows. It even did get cheaper before MS DOS. BTW, it getting cheaper was the reason the i8080 and CP/M even did get created, as Unix and the PDP also did. Not even that, CP/M, Sinclair and the TRS-80 machines, not to mention the Commodores, were even cheaper than the IBM PC clones. Even the Apple Macintosh was cheaper than the original IBM PCs and PS/2s...

      > and demand for a graphic OS. Unless you are still using Warp?

      Let's say, Mac OS, Amiga OS, IBM OS/2, Unix... I fail to see how the graphics are relevant, though.

      > Spare me the party line

      What if it's relevant? One argues for, another against, what's the problem exactly? After all, these guys were actually convicted... are you in Plato's cave yet?

      > Millions of people disagree with you.

      I know quite a few people who are frustrated with their systems. MS Windows do work, but at enormous human cost in terms of stress, unaccounted work hours... making the user the sysadmin is no answer to the sysadmin cost problem, but it effectively hides it.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    13. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spare me the party line, mmkay?

      Ah you mean the party that disagrees with the courts that convicted MS for being a monopolist? Thats a thin party line there, pal.

    14. Re:China is enormous by gacp · · Score: 1

      I often paraphrase a famous saying about the Solar System to illustrate your point: Humanity is made up of China and assorted minor societies.

      --
      ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    15. Re:China is enormous by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      Yes, sir. Typical MS weenie confusion of ideas, thinking there was no PC before MS Windows.

      Lay off the GNU/Crack d00d. If you can't argue without resorting to childish insults then don't even bother posting.

      CP/M even did get created, as Unix and the PDP also did. Not even that, CP/M, Sinclair and the TRS-80 machines, not to mention the Commodores, were even cheaper than the IBM PC clones. Even the Apple Macintosh was cheaper than the original IBM PCs and PS/2s...

      Look - I understand this is a painful topic for you. "What? Microsoft did what? OMG, that can't be!!!" Your arguments are irrelevant insofar as I never claimed that Windows reduced the street price of Altair by 25%. Anything other than the IBM Personal Computer is irrelevant. Does that make sense? Besides...

      MS only capitalised on it better, earlier and more ruthlessly than Digital Research.

      ...you just made my point for me. I wasn't arguing anything else. To boot, Microsoft was one of the major factors in commoditizing PC hardware. That's it. Whether you agree with the methods or the end result or not is not my problem. The facts are the facts and history doesn't lie.

      MS Windows do work, but at enormous human cost in terms of stress, unaccounted work hours...

      And let me guess - you propose Linux as an alternative? Right. We're almost there - just as soon as I can get my USB scanner to work without selling my soul to satan.

    16. Re:China is enormous by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      You're only partially right. I think Compaq's reverse engineering of the IBM PC-BIOS had a lot more to do with bringing competition into the PC hardware market. If Compaq hadn't invented the very concept of the PC clone we'd still be paying $4,000 for IBM PCs. Remember, it's hardware prices that have fallen, not software. MS's almost $100 take on that $400 PC makes it the single most expensive component.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    17. Re:China is enormous by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      China is run by authoratarian leaders... so I'm sure there will be equivalent pro-censorship mandates...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    18. Re:China is enormous by timmy+the+large · · Score: 1
      I prefered SCSI, Firewire and all the nice high end shit too. Until I had to buy it myself.

      Even with the amount prices on SCSI especially have dropped, it is still nowhere near as cheap as IDE. And son't even get started about the price gap 5 years ago. High end kit is real nice, but most folks just cant afford it.

    19. Re:China is enormous by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Maybe, maybe not. They are getting better.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    20. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > If you can't argue without resorting to childish insults

      Actually I am trying to argue, but you kept throwing preconceptions without any historical basis. So I tried something more lighthearted... if you took offense, your problem, not mine.

      > I never claimed that Windows reduced the street price of Altair by 25%

      So what? You still attribute everything to MS Windows, in total defiance of History. It is like 1984 or USSR, where someone rewrote the past...

      > I wasn't arguing anything else.

      Yes, you were arguing MS did it all. Can you see the difference between doing something and capitalising on it? Digital Research did it with x86, IBM made it happen with the PC, MS capitalised on it.

      > Microsoft was one of the major factors in commoditizing PC hardware

      As someone else argued in this thread, MS did nothing the like. IBM created the open PC, DR created the OS... forgot MS-DOS was a CP/M-86 clone? Microsoft only did to PC-DOS what DR had been doing to its own CP/M, to wit selling it to everyone and your father. It didn't create the OS, didn't create the business model (DR), didn't gave it respectability or volume (IBM).

      > just as soon as I can get my USB scanner to work

      Let me guess, you can't see how MS is part of the problem, right? So let me explain...

      First, by dumping open system for proprietary ones, MS drastically reduced availability, portability and quality of programs, so that we have less useable, more expensive, less capable programs. Granted, the proprietary Unix vendors are almost as guilty, so GNU has to catch up now.

      Second, by making use of NDAs and general secrecy all around in a monopolised market, MS Windows gets all the drivers. Were there competition, we'd have the drivers for most OSs, or better yet the necessary information to create them.

      Third, by fostering a cheapo culture, MS helped validating this kind of crap a USB scanner is. USB was never meant to drive scanners; SCSI and FireWire are. Buy crap, live with it, it's simple as that.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    21. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > Even with the amount prices on SCSI especially have dropped, it is still nowhere near as cheap as IDE

      It doesn't have to be. Even the smaller SCSI drives are bigger than one could wish for. I see it as a trade off between size and reliability, and reliability wins every time.

      But I don't mean everyone should always pay the price for quality; I mean it is sad we are in a cheapo culture, and I bashed MS for having contributed to it.

      I see two sides to it: one, MS helped lower expectations. Second, MS bloat makes us keep needing more and more instead of better and better. As I see it, were we running open systems, we could accept last year hardware speed, get next year system performance, and mostly important, we could even get workstation quality and reliability. Balance is the key to performance, not speed.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    22. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read this thread. Written by the great grand parent.

    23. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny thing is in one of those articals they were bemoaning that it costs 6 months wages for just windows. What about the rest of the box? A custom controler for a custom cpu with very little market will not be the 400 dollar boxen we are currently talking about.

      Oh there will be a market for it. But the boxes will be more along the lines of 1500 bucks a piece JUST for hardware. Oh and there is only one supplier. Forget falling prices or improved performance to gain customer share. Last years 1.2ghz cpu is JUST fine you dont need more than that. We the state have determnined that. In fact why are you asking for more power? Power is ours to dole out to you as we see fit, not yours to ask for.

    24. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess that would remove one of the three advantages. Theoretically.

    25. Re:China is enormous by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Wait, make that most US people totally ignore History."

      I love how some people can make generalizations about 250 million individuals without giving it a second thought.

    26. Re:China is enormous by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2, Informative

      IBM deserve credit for making the IBM PC an open standard

      IBM didn't make it an open standard. It was Compaq and others that started shipping clones using a reverse engineered BIOS that opened the door. IBM made the PC credible, that is true, but IBM had no intention of making it open.

      Fact is, nobody with any real measure of marketshare wants things open - since that's paving the avenue for competitors to run them down. Openness is something that the underdogs introduce out of necessity, which Compaq was at the time.

    27. Re:China is enormous by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 2, Informative
      It is true that Compaq (and others) reverse engineered the BIOS in order to avoid paying license fees to IBM. This was made a lot easier by the fact that IBM published the ROM BIOS specification. A good short summary of the original IBM PC Concept is available in the Wikipedia. This states in part:

      The original PC was an IBM attempt to get into the home computer market then dominated by the Apple II.

      Rather than going through the usual IBM design process, which had already failed to design an affordable microcomputer (for example the failed IBM 5100), a special team were assembled to bypass normal company restrictions and get soemthing to market rapidly. The project was given the code name Project Chess.

      The team consisted of just 12 people headed by William Lowe. They succeeded - development of the PC took about a year. To achieve this they first decided to build the machine with "off-the-shelf" parts from a variety of different Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEM)s and countries. Previously IBM had developed their own components. Second they decided on an open architecture so that other manufacturers could produce and sell compatible machines - the IBM PC compatibles, so the specification of the ROM BIOS was published. IBM hoped to maintain their position in the market by royalties from licencing the BIOS, and by keeping ahead of the competition.

      Unfortunately for IBM, other manufacturers rapidly reverse engineered the BIOS to produce their own royalty-free versions. (Compaq Computer Corporation manufactured the first cloned IBM PC compatible in 1984)

    28. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      >> most US people totally ignore History
      some people can make generalizations

      Most, not all. And you've miss'd the tongue-in-cheek.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    29. Re:China is enormous by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      What IBM, not MS, did with the PC was to create a middle ground between toy microcomputers and midrange computers that was powerful enough to run real numbers in it, and respectable enough to be bought for office usage.

      Quite a few of the "toy" computers that were around when the IBM PC appeared were quite a bit more powerful. What IBM did was create a computer with swappable parts (which made it attractive to hobbyists, giving them the home market, which at the time was strictly hobbyists), and (to elaborate on your own second point) create a computer that had the IBM name on it so that the crusty old bastards who ran corporate computing would get a warm-fuzzy over letting these things into the building.

      The original IBM PC was a slow, lame piece of shit, no matter what OS you used. It tends to be glorified in retrospect because it was the distant relative of today's PCs -- but for that we mostly have Intel to thank, not IBM.

      I do agree with most of the rest of what you wrote, though.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    30. Re:China is enormous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CP/M was not a hobiest system. It was the only choice before MS-DOS and was considered a competitor in the early days of micro computers. MS-DOS was designed to be as compatable as possible with CP/M in order to capture the CP/M market.

      The rest of your post though, yeah. Microsoft positioned themselves well to encourage the clone market, thus creating competition and driving the market towards commodity. Apple and the UNIX vendors[1] were doing the exact oposite, and lost.

      [1]: That could almost be a band name.

    31. Re:China is enormous by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Not to mention cheap boxes are usually trash. I'd rather have a FireWire, SCSI, USB, PostScript system than a USB, IDE, PS/2, PCL system anytime...

      I presume you are referring to PS/2 PORTS, not the PS/2 line of computers by IBM which were highly advanced for their day. They also were extremely expensive, and producing components for the microchannel architecture was much more expensive than ISA.

      RIP Microchannel.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    32. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > Quite a few of the "toy" computers that were around when the IBM PC appeared were quite a bit more powerful.

      I would be interested in references for this... I had always understood the IBM PC was the first i8088 system under US$5K, and that the i8086 was too expensive. Are you thinking the Motorola parts, were they really more powerful? Or were the systems themselves better balanced?

      > The original IBM PC was a slow, lame piece of shit

      Comparing to what?

      > no matter what OS you used

      But the CP/M-86 is said to have been better... and the UCSD p-system was portable, what would have commoditised hardware even more.

      > we mostly have Intel to thank, not IBM

      Perhaps you are right, but I tend to think had IBM choosen Motorola instead we'd have saner systems without so much dirty-and-cheapo'ness. OTOH it was IBM that validated the i808[68] for general computing, out of the hobbist millieu, so I think it gets the credit.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    33. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > I presume you are referring to PS/2 PORTS, not the PS/2 line of computers

      Yes, obviously. My failure not being clear at all. BTW PS/2 ports is a difficulty for me: we should all be in USB nirvana for input peripherals -- not storage and imaging -- but AFAIK IBM Selectronic keyboards (Model M) are only available for PS/2 ports.

      > They also were extremely expensive

      Because of both quality and proprietariness

      > producing components for the microchannel architecture was much more expensive than ISA

      ISA is also cheaper than PCI, so what? The problem was being proprietary, so that production volumes were divided between open but ugly hack EISA and beautiful but proprietary MCA.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    34. Re:China is enormous by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      While many have roasted your opinion, I will add some more heat. There were several competing DOS versions which offered general compatibilty with each other. I didn't pay much attention because I was still spending sleepless nights with my Model I.
      The price for an IBM was about the same as my Tandy with a disk drive upgrade. Prices stayed at about $2000 for a long time. The real price drops occured when the hardware vendors got competition in the form of Cyrix, AMD, and WinChip. The world moved from proprietary standards on hardware to mostly open standards to save money, just as there will be a similar move in software over the next few years.
      The first change mostly sucked for manufacturers who lost their cash cow, and the second will cut the fat from the software industry (may already have happened).

    35. Re:China is enormous by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      While many have roasted your opinion, I will add some more heat

      Oh fear.

      There were several competing DOS versions which offered general compatibilty with each other

      Again, what the hell does that have to do with anything?

      competition in the form of Cyrix, AMD, and WinChip

      I hate to brake it to you, but there's more to a PC than the processor. And all these cheap machines - they were being bought by people running... what? OS/2? CP/M? Amiga? No, they were running Windows. Crappy Windows 3.1, but Windows nonetheless. Is that so hard to grok?

      just as there will be a similar move in software over the next few years

      Translation: "M$ is teh sux". Which, again, has nothing to do with my original point.

    36. Re:China is enormous by The+Bungi · · Score: 1
      True to form, we've gone down the "it's all Microsoft's fault, propietary is evil, I want everything to be free" road.

      Thanks for sharing.

    37. Re:China is enormous by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > it's all Microsoft's fault

      No one ever said it, even if the bigger you are, the more responsibility you have.

      > propietary is evil

      It is. Why not?

      > I want everything to be free

      I care about freedom, sad thing you don't.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    38. Re:China is enormous by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Translation: "M$ is teh sux" -- since I don't even know what this means, I can't really comment on it, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't what my original post intended, considering "M$" never occurred.
      More importantly, I was addressing the point of your original post, as I read it, which was that MS (no $) was responsible for the standardization of the computer industry, and I disagreed. I woundn't have argued against your point if it was that MS made software more affordable, because many software houses then had a common framework on which to compete, but you were talking about hardware. MS had nothing to do with the affordability of hardware platforms, because they began competing, again, on a single platform. Anyway, by the time Cyrix, AMD, and WinChip became serious players, I'm pretty sure all the new machines were selling Win95.
      Finally, learn to argue civily and brush up on your homophones, and people will take your opinions more seriously. If you're just having a bad day, then my apologies.

  9. Excellent value for the price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Troll

    I have heard that this is actually a rebranded Elbrus E2K. Clock for clock, it is unbeatable. If they are able to increase the frequency and the chip is properly scalable, the Power5 may have a worthy competitor!

    1. Re:Excellent value for the price! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hook.
      Line.
      Sinker.

      I can't believe this was modded to 4, Informative.

      Congrats to the AC!

  10. Why on earth would I buy... by DavidBrown · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...a Dragon chip in the Year of the Ram? Dragon chips are so 4698. (Year 2000 for Gregorian Calendar fanatics out there)

    I'd rather buy a Ram chip - at least that way I know I'm being current.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
    1. Re:Why on earth would I buy... by deuist · · Score: 1

      Knowing the Chinese, it will really be a stolen Intel chip (the sheep) made to look like an AMD (the horse). At least this way, a cost-conscious PHB (the monkey) could try to save his company money by shifting money overseas.

    2. Re:Why on earth would I buy... by zephc · · Score: 1

      that's okay, the Dragon chip will come back into style in another nine years. Will there be a market for retro chinese computing?

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    3. Re:Why on earth would I buy... by MBCook · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. Ram is very cheap right now too. You can get a half gig of PC133 for $36, according to pricewatch. But dragons are priceless. Do you know how much that means they cost???

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    4. Re:Why on earth would I buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excuse me, you should read Article.

      He says, DRAGON Chip support RAM Chip. He control even four RAM Chip!

      So, why you throw chip? This year should Ok to buy.

  11. Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2, they can't hold a candle to anything coming out of the united states. This chip may work for webstation-type things, but it will be useless for any real computing.

    1. Re:Yeah but... by psyconaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Define "real computing"...you'd be surprised how good these chips would be for embedded use.

      Also how much horsepower do you really think you need to for basic email, web, word processing and accounts use? Remember: a lot of people used to run their entire businesses on IBM XTs!

      -psy

    2. Re:Yeah but... by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2

      Confucious say, he who would walk far must still take first step.

      Besides, experience with a P2 equivalent is a lot better than nothing when trying to design a P4 killer - not to mention the fact that Linux can quite comfortably be tailored to run on a 500mhz machine - Open Office might be a bit painful, but AbiWord will fly.

      --
      Beep beep.
    3. Re:Yeah but... by tuxlove · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2, they can't hold a candle to anything coming out of the united states.

      For now, that is. China has massive potential, and some day in the not too distant future the US CPU industry could be eating their dust. This event is not to be shrugged off lightly. It should be viewed as a call to arms by US chip developers. If they instead fall asleep at the wheel, things could end up quite ugly for them.

      I am talking about raw performance here, BTW. The Chinese could some day produce chips that are faster than chips designed by the US. But that's not necessarily what's required for the Chinese to win. If they produce a chip with a very compelling price/performance ratio, that could also have a dramatic effect. Imagine a CPU with, as a theoretical example, half the speed of a top of the line Intel CPU, but for one tenth the price. The war might well be lost simply on this basis.

    4. Re:Yeah but... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Remember: a lot of people used to run their entire businesses on IBM XTs!

      The keyword here is "used" ...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    5. Re:Yeah but... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      you'd be surprised how many still run.

      it was enough for the job. they would have used paper otherwise, and i suppose lots and lots of these things are done on paper currently in china.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Yeah but... by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Um, so? I sat on a P2/233 up until this year in the department. With 256Mb memory, running Gnome2 with Mozilla, AbiWord and Evolution was no problem at all. For office/productivity apps, the CPU simply isn't a serious bottleneck; the critical parameter is memory (to avoid swapping).

      And why did I sit on such an old machine? Because I was too lazy to get up and order a new one until after New years, since it basically worked fine for what I used it for. Only when it started to act up (hard drive read failure rate was shooting up alarmingly, and the video card was going south) did I feel the need to get a new machine.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    7. Re:Yeah but... by y77 · · Score: 0

      The Chinese people whom I know say its just sounds cool and only be viewed as a diff. This is like there'll be eating their customers and charging the slave labor wages. A chip industry that uses this chip fabrication, which uses SuSE Linux 7.3. With some real competition as a good bargain for the IT industry, including North Koreans have purchased some Soviet MiGs abroad. North America's big trading partners uses these techniques every bit as the Chinese could easily beat it. No more cheap "boxen" thanks to some rich chinese people. If they deserve better living conditions than 10 employees, then I'm not going to care when trying to pricewatch. As much Windows has never before manufactured a Ram chip industry could be the global IT industry. And it will start for China, and copying it. I have never seen any of members all the Intel CPU, but it will fly. For now, that means they can think of the Chinese are also quite often have a lot of factors. It is a lot better than nothing when all the company money makes a dramatic effect. Imagine a stolen Intel chip fabrication, which explains why a computer processor of its just never got updated.

    8. Re:Yeah but... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      Actually, I know people who still do their books on a Commodore Amiga. It ain't pretty, but it works for them.

      There are a *lot* of ~200-300Mhz machines still out there serving useful purposes....heck, a lot of schools still run PCs of that era in their labs ;-)

      -psy

    9. Re:Yeah but... by RevMike · · Score: 1
      I know of a fortune 500 type firm that runs its most critical financial application on VAX/VMS.

    10. Re:Yeah but... by noldrin · · Score: 1

      Seeing as the Pentium II is my high end machine currently, it's looking pretty good!

    11. Re:Yeah but... by Bun · · Score: 1

      Was that English? Could somebody translate?

      --
      "Anyone that has ever gotten an idea based on any of my work and done something better with it-good for you."--J.Carmack
    12. Re:Yeah but... by wondafucka · · Score: 1

      Average pentium 2 useless? I'm not leaving my pentium 2 for anything faster for at least another couple of years (although I process my video on another system). As for the architecture difference, you have me there.

    13. Re:Yeah but... by Torham · · Score: 1
      "If they produce a chip with a very compelling price/performance ratio, that could also have a dramatic effect. Imagine a CPU with, as a theoretical example, half the speed of a top of the line Intel CPU, but for one tenth the price."

      Newegg has Pentium 3.2 for $699 and AMD 2100+ for $65.

    14. Re:Yeah but... by bmorris · · Score: 1

      And before that, they ran their businesses with typewriters. :)

      Contrary to popular /. belief, there are applications which, even on Linux, don't run well on a 386. VPN, large spreadsheets, IM, web browsing, and email. Individually, perhaps, but you might find you're more productive if you can run several of those at once...

      Probably TCO for the machines they're targetting would be cheaper if they stuck with existing commodity parts. But I'm sure it would be fun to build it all yourself. Just glad I don't have to support it.

    15. Re:Yeah but... by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      Newegg has Pentium 3.2 for $699 and AMD 2100+ for $65.

      It's just an example. Don't take my numbers too literally. If you really want to, then howz about 1/100th the price instead of 1/10th? Don't miss the forest for the trees.

    16. Re:Yeah but... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      The only problem is that these "dragon chips" are about equivilent to your average pentium 2, they can't hold a candle to anything coming out of the united states. This chip may work for webstation-type things, but it will be useless for any real computing.

      Unless you're doing computational fluid dynamics as your day job, you don't need a computer _even_ as fast as this.

      The vast majority of computers are used for general office work. Aren't the *nix advocates the ones who have been saying that they could do on their 386s what the dx2-66/Windows crowd was doing, all of those years ago?

      I do the majority of my computing on a Celeron 366. The only time I noticed slowdown on it was when I tried to brute-borce solve a Rubik's Cube.

      China gets a chip that satisfies most of their needs, and can use a simple and robust architecture and implementation and save a bundle on development time. Sounds good to me.

    17. Re:Yeah but... by fermion · · Score: 1
      Every competitor starts as a nuisance creating product that are generally substandard to the market leader. In time, the competitor may create some specific advantage like price, quality, or options, that makes it attractive to a small number of consumers. That limited success provides the capital and experience needed to improve the product to the point that it becomes equal to the former market leader.

      MS has played this game. Intel has played this game. Chrysler lost this game.

      The current power or quality of this chip is not the issue. if they manage to create a chip of reasonable quality, the captive market is huge. If they follow the model of other Asian countries, the chip will improve to the point of being a real competitor, and, with the production cost differences between the US and China, one wonders if Intel et al could compete. Like the Linux situation Intel might try to stop the competition through lawsuits, but one should not hold much hope in that.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:Yeah but... by bogie · · Score: 1

      You'd also be surprised how many Fortune 500 companies have DOS running in some fashion or another. Hell more than "10,000 financial institutions use the DOS-based FedLine to transfer billions of dollars daily." http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1712,00.asp

      Old OS's and computers aren't going away anytime soon.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    19. Re:Yeah but... by William+Baric · · Score: 1

      If they produce a chip with a very compelling price/performance ratio, that could also have a dramatic effect.

      What would be really great is if they could sell those chip for 5$ and put something like 8 chips on a PCI card. Anyone remember the Amiga "transputer"?

    20. Re:Yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Imagine a CPU with, as a theoretical example, half the speed of a top of the line Intel CPU, but for one tenth the price. The war might well be lost simply on this basis."

      I'm pretty sure that's not going to matter much. You can buy a pretty damn fast chip these days for $50. The processor is not the major cost in computers.

      Really this seems like a good thing all the way around.

      1. You have a new competitor to the processor scene, which ups competititon and should be a kick in the ass for Intel and AMD and the rest of them. They already work to beat each other, now they can work to beat the Chinese too.

      2. Linux already runs on the new processor, and afaik Windows doesn't. That's potentially a lot more people using free software, which is a good thing from Raymond's view (More eyes to find bugs and "more itches" to scratch) and from Stallman's view (more people getting exposed to the philosophy of free software, and not tied into proprietary solutions)

    21. Re:Yeah but... by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I'm browsing on a 300 MHz Celeron machine. A dragon would be a step up, I think.

      I can compile Linux From Scratch in a single evening. I think this machine is more than sufficient for my needs. I can't imagine why a Dragon wouldn't be.

    22. Re:Yeah but... by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      So...were you successful in your brute-force of the Rubik's Cube? (aka Continuum Transfunctioner?)

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    23. Re:Yeah but... by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Ya! Everyone knows that firewalls, routers, print servers, file servers, various misc. embedded devices, including network devices, java computers, so on and so on, don't qualify as "real computing."

    24. Re:Yeah but... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      So...were you successful in your brute-force of the Rubik's Cube? (aka Continuum Transfunctioner?)

      No, which is puzzling, because it was the 2x2x2 cube, which only has about 10 million combinations (once rotations are removed). If the network of cube states has no special properties, it should take 13-15 moves to reach any possible state. I did exhaustive searches to about 21 moves, and randomized searches much deeper than that (deep enough that even if the state graph had peculiar properties, a solution should have been found).

      There's obviously a bug in the program, but I haven't tracked it down yet.

      And before anyone mentions that it would take less time just to look up how to solve the cube, I wrote the program for the fun of it :). I'm also trying to figure out solution techniques without looking at a cheat sheet, which is easier if I can get the cube back to a pristine starting position.

    25. Re:Yeah but... by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Actually, I wouldn't recommend you look up how to solve the thing, rather, I'd recommend you write a program to remove the little stickers on the cube and...

      Okay, so that's not nearly as funny as I thought it would be. Erf.

      Good luck with the programming, though :)

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    26. Re:Yeah but... by cmacb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "For now, that is. China has massive potential, and some day in the not too distant future the US CPU industry could be eating their dust. This event is not to be shrugged off lightly. It should be viewed as a call to arms by US chip developers. If they instead fall asleep at the wheel, things could end up quite ugly for them."

      Finally! After 200 off topic left vs right messages someone gets the bigger picture.

      Two more things that make this more than just another AMD nuisance for Intel. The Chinese will be integrating these into complete PCs by the millions, and their target will be lower price machines, not faster ones. Intel can wear AMD down in the race to make chips both faster and at a (relatively) lower cost, the final consumer machine based on these things will be phenomenally cheap.

      Will American consumers turn down complete PCs for $100 or so just because they don't say "Intel Inside"? I don't think so.

      If we want to keep any part of the PC hardware industry here in the US we had better start thinking more about cost. The end-user PC should be a dirt cheap device by now. Make bigger margins on servers, no problem, but for the end user, a toaster sized box with little or nothing left to add for $100 or so is all you need. Of course there is still one outrageously priced component of the typical end-user PC that I haven't mentioned that is going to have to drastically change (hint: not the monitor either).

      The other interesting questions is: What will these machines do to the DRM concept if they are readily available world-wide? Lets see, should I get the expensive DRM limited machine with the bloated operating system, or should I "settle" for this cheap import with the slick new operating system and no limits on what I can do? Decisions, decisions...

    27. Re:Yeah but... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      While they won't run too well on a 386, they will run just dandy on an old PII. And if the Dragon chip is indeed as powerful as PII, then they will run just fine on the Dragon.

    28. Re:Yeah but... by tuxlove · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is the next logical step. If China can produce or acquire the components for a full PC on the cheap, they'll be a major force in the computer industry. I agree that people will want to have non-DRM systems (me for one!), but what if your favorite application will only run on a DRM-crippled PC? I, for example, am enough of a game addict that if the games I wanted to play required DRM to run, I'd probably have both a DRM and non-DRM PC. :)

  12. Odd comment by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    a copy of Windows XP would take the average paddy field worker six months to earn

    Who gives a turkey? (1) unfortunately, paddy field workers don't buy XP because they would need another year to buy the computer equipment, and (2) how much do you bet rich chinese people who can afford computers copy XP right and left, laughing their ass off when they see the SPA and BSA gesticulate beyond the PRC's borders ?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Odd comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This chip is supposed to solve that problem.

      Instead of waiting 18 months for XP+wester computer paddy field workers could afford computer with local CPU+Linux with 1-2 month salary.

  13. All I can say is "meh". by radiumhahn · · Score: 4, Funny
    I have the strange desire to steal the technology and sell it for pennies on the dollar in the US

    Is turnaround still fairplay?

    1. Re:All I can say is "meh". by radiumhahn · · Score: 1
      On second thought. "meh."

    2. Re:All I can say is "meh". by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Is turnaround still fairplay?

      Sure, if you like chasing your tail.

      Turnabout, on the other hand...

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:All I can say is "meh". by Trespass · · Score: 1
      I have the strange desire to steal the technology and sell it for pennies on the dollar in the US
      Is turnaround still fairplay?


      What the hell do you think Linux is for?

    4. Re:All I can say is "meh". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meh.

    5. Re:All I can say is "meh". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I have the strange desire to steal the
      > technology and sell it for pennies
      > on the dollar in the US

      Not with DMCA you won't.

      Also, if such a CPU becomes popular, someone
      will license it for sale in the US.

      What's that saying about selling rope to capitalists?

  14. Midori?? by Zonaflash · · Score: 1

    Why use a Japanese word for a Chinese chip? How can they sell chips without a slick marketing campaign? Why not name it after a bunch of Chinese rivers like that other firm... y'know the ones that made the Blue Man Group famous for nothing?

    --
    SoftBank Haiku: The bandwidth broadens; Users sign up in millions. Where are the profits?
    1. Re:Midori?? by Zonaflash · · Score: 1

      umm... don't answer that!

      --
      SoftBank Haiku: The bandwidth broadens; Users sign up in millions. Where are the profits?
    2. Re:Midori?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japanese sounds like Chinese.

      To me, its all:

      Ching, Chang, Chong, Walla Walla Bing Bong.

    3. Re:Midori?? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      In the words of Shaquille O'Neal:
      "Tell Yao Ming, 'Ching-chong-yang-wah-ah-so.'"
      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Midori?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not name it after a bunch of Chinese rivers like that other firm... y'know the ones that made the Blue Man Group famous for nothing?

      Assuming you're referring to Intel..
      Since when have Klamath, Deschutes, Katmai, Merced, Coppermine, Willamette, Northwood, McKinley etc etc etc been chinese rivers?
      Or are the communist hordes now copying our river names too?

    5. Re:Midori?? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Who said the chip was named 'Midori'?

      More reading, less typing, eh?

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  15. What happened to Midori ? by bergeron76 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So is this what happened to Midori? It offered a tremendous amount of promise, but it just never got updated (circa 2001) - egh! Does anyone know of a Midori equivalent that's actually recent (and not LFS)?

    It looks like Midori shut their mouth for one reason or another after Transmeta took over.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  16. t minus... by the_real_tigga · · Score: 2, Funny

    Commencing countdown to first occurrence of lame "Double Dragon"(TM) joke in reference to SMP setups.

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
    1. Re:t minus... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      GAME OVER (slashdotted)
      ADD COIN TO CONTINUE
  17. OH no. American companies are sooo ARFRAID by zymano · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    If any of you really knew about economics of the world today you would know that the CHINESE are experts at taking others tech and copying it. Another point is that the reason most companies leave for China is because of the SLAVE labore wages. Do you really believe this chip will compete against the big FABs of the U.S. ? I will believe when i see it.

  18. Good news! by psyconaut · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is actually pretty significant...and kudos to the Chinese for making it happen.

    About the only mainstream chip that I can think of off the top-of-my-head that's not U.S. bred is the ARM (which is British in origin). (I'm sure there are others, but you get my point).

    And for all of you who say "this chip has lame performance", think back 5-10 years. If you had something like this 10 years ago, you'd pee your pants. This is like going from 0-100Kmh for the Chinese....many don't have any computing resources....chips like these will start to make things accessible for many (although not all).

    Also remember back in 1986 when your relative who had a computer did all his accounts on an IBM XT? You don't need gobs of computing power to do basic business functions...and remember the majority of businesses *anywhere* are small businesses with less than 10 employees.

    Technology is also quite often culturally imbred....ever looked at how many consumer electronics devices are HUGE in Japan, but don't take off in the U.S.? It's that embedded cultural technology difference....and maybe with China having some homegrown options, they can develop systems that better meet the needs of their population.

    Anyhoo, just my two cents. :-)

    -psy

    1. Re:Good news! by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 1
      About the only mainstream chip that I can think of off the top-of-my-head that's not U.S. bred is the ARM

      Japan (think NEC, Fujitsu and Sony) have mass produced high performance chips. True, they do not turn up in your US assembled PC, but they exist. Also, think about graphics processors. True, much of the design takes place in the US, but the manufacturing technology is developed in Taiwan.

    2. Re:Good news! by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      and maybe with China having some homegrown options, they can develop systems that better meet the needs of their population.

      You mean like some kind of internal support for Chinese character generation? Like the article says? Gee, how profound.

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    3. Re:Good news! by shibashaba · · Score: 2, Informative

      Via c3 from taiwan. before that they were doing cyrix even though it was made by ibm.

      --
      ---------- Open Source is capitalism applied to IP.
    4. Re:Good news! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      About the only mainstream chip that I can think of off the top-of-my-head that's not U.S. bred is the ARM (which is British in origin). (I'm sure there are others, but you get my point).

      If there are others, they aren't nearly as mainstream as ARM. The next closest I can think of is possibly some microcontrollers, even that is heavily dominated by US designs. I think Fujitsu and NEC both have some sort of SIMD or somesuch, but that is for supercomputing.

    5. Re:Good news! by frostgiant · · Score: 1

      The next closest I can think of is possibly some microcontrollers, even that is heavily dominated by US designs. I think Fujitsu and NEC both have some sort of SIMD or somesuch, but that is for supercomputing.

      NEC has the wonderful V8xx series of microcontrollers, though they seem to be phasing those out.

    6. Re:Good news! by Cwaig · · Score: 1

      There's also the ARC processors (from what was originally Argonaut's hardware team that developed booster chipset's for the SNES). That's another UK design.....

      --
      +++ BASELINE REALITY FAILURE+++ +++ PLEASE REBOOT UNIVERSE +++
  19. But wouldn't you say its a good start? by gotr00t · · Score: 3, Informative
    Also remember that there is more riding on the sucess of this chip than its speed. China is trying to decrease its reliance on foreign technologies, and has been all along, which explains the huge amounts of revenue that have gone into the research for a better fighter plane when they could have purchased some Soviet MiGs all along.

    This nation has never before manufactured a computer processor of this power before, and even though processors from the US could easily beat it, its still a good bargain for the users and a good start for the country. Moreover, not everybody is a gamer, and sometimes, older processors do fine for everyday work tasks. For example, I have seen a lot of server boxes that still use Pentium II class processors and work fine. I still sometimes use my P II desktop, which uses SuSE Linux 7.3, and I think that its just about as fast as my Athlon 1700 when it comes to word processing and simple GUI tasks.

    1. Re:But wouldn't you say its a good start? by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      when it comes to word processing and simple GUI tasks.

      because that's all _others_ need.. simple gui tasks. (just an observation - your post mirrors what most people here say about slower cpus..)

  20. My random observation by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I spent a good deal of time in China a couple of years back. All I have to say is, the many people whom I met all over the country were honest and worked very hard, and I think that they deserve better living conditions than they currently have.

    Their government is slowly but surely making progress towards a more reasonable form, and I hope that news technology developments like this are harbingers of improvement in their economy and the lives of the Chinese people in general.

    1. Re:My random observation by jcr · · Score: 1

      I think that they deserve better living conditions than they currently have.

      And once they overthrow the Mao Dynasty, I'm sure they will.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:My random observation by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately the Mao Dynasty, as you refer to it, was the only means by which the Chinese were able to finally get rid of the monkey on their back which had been holding them down for hundreds of years. That monkey was imperialism by European powers. It's really too bad that the only political party which was able to gather enough momentum to finally push the imperialists out was the communist party. It's also unfortunate that the imperialists had to be pushed out at all, otherwise China may very well have developed a democratic government on its own ...

    3. Re:My random observation by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      To be clearer ... what I'm trying to say is, if the European powers had not held China down for so long, at a time when the Chinese imperial system might naturally have crumbled on its own, but was instead propped up by the imperialists to their own ends, and at the expense of the Chinese people, then maybe China would be a democratic country now.

    4. Re:My random observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If China wasn't a backwards shithole, the "imperialists" wouldn't have been able to "hold it down." You'd still be harvesting rice if it weren't for the "imperialists."

    5. Re:My random observation by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1

      The Europeans didn't contribute very much to China's infrastructure. Even today, many parts of China are not significantly different from the way they were hundreds of years ago. The imperialists did not change that at all.

      They did, however, give China beer. Some Chinese beers aren't bad, even bordering on pretty good; I really enjoyed the 25 cent liter bottles of Yang Jing beer in Beijing.

      Also, Tianjin (and probably many other Chinese cities that I wasn't fortunate enough to visit) has some neat European architecture that it wouldn't have had without the Europeans.

      But aside from that, I don't think that the imperialists really helped mainland China much at all. Hong Kong is an entirely different story though.

    6. Re:My random observation by anagama · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One other thing, 100 years ago, America was practically 3rd world in terms of labor conditions. There were labor riots, slave labor conditions, factories that burned down with the workers inside (fire escapes doors locked to prevent the workers from sneaking off), etc. etc. As economic prosperity increased, workers took it on themselves to see they got a share. We aren't talking about converting to communism (though certainly there were red groups), we're talking about fair labor standards, 40 hour work weeks, overtime laws etc. etc.

      Also interesting, is that even though America started out as a handful of colonies - think plantations, export of raw materials on the cheap, cheap manufacturing (3d world style) - it eventually built itself into a first world economy. And interestingly, England's economy has remained first world all along. Truth is, a strong economy in the US, or Australia, or any other of England's colonies has not destroyed it at all.

      In other words, if living/working conditions improve in China - it won't drive us back into the 3d world. In fact, the greatest hope for peace really is a rising standard of living in China. The majority of wealthy nations have relatively open governments and significant amounts of freedom for their citizens. This type of stability is bought only through the existance of a significant middle class. Desperate and impoverished people are far less likely to be peacable. Relatively well off people usually refuse to tolerate highly oppressive governments. This chip will be good for China, and for everyone else in many direct and indirect ways.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    7. Re:My random observation by jcr · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but that's nothing but a load of party-line tripe.

      Many other former colonies are independent, (mostly) democratic countries today, and they achieved it without having a few tens of millions of their people starved to death by the only dictator who managed to rival Stalin for sheer numbers of people killed.

      Whatever sins the various colonial powers may have comitted in China, they never imposed a policy of deliberately starving millions of peasants.

      As for "holding them down" for "hundreds of years", it was their home-grown tyrants in the Ming and Manchu dynasties who saw to it that the west passed them by technologically.

      Since then, the Mao dynasty's disastrous economic policies have kept the average Chinese in a pitiful state of squalor, and only the private intiative of Chinese entrepeneurs working against the emperors have made survial, (and even a bit a prosperity in the last few decades) possible.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    8. Re:My random observation by jcr · · Score: 1

      Liberty and prosperity go hand in hand. If China becomes a free country, they'll have an economic boom like we've never seen in the history of the world. (Imagine a country as large as China, and as productive per capita as Taiwan.)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    9. Re:My random observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a lot more complicated than (paraphrase) 'Mao Zedong was the only one who could throw out European Imperialists.'

      My interpretation is that Dr. Sun Yat-sen basically succeeded in getting the Europeans & Americans to back off (except for Hong Kong, etc.). China was much more successful than India and Africa in resisting European imperialism. This is not to excuse the Westerners, but it is a simple statement.

      Then of course in the 1930s the Japanese imperialists came into China, and the Europeans (well, USSR, USA, UK) were useful allies in throwing them out.

      At that point, yes, there was some interference from Europeans in China's political affairs... but a very large portion of it was the Soviets supporting Mao.

      The Chinese communists did (to their credit) succeed in pulling out of the Soviet orbit, so Mao did cast off outside interference. But it's not clear that their particular government was necessary or even useful in gaining independence. Taiwan is an example of how it could've been done differently, and at least as successfully.

      Then of course there are these minor ironies of Communist China's interference in other nations (Tibet, Korea, Afghanistan, Pakistan).

      Like the US and other nations, they resented foreign intrusions on their own country, but turned out to be somewhat hypocritical once they started to become powerful enough to get into threaten other people's independence.

      Hopefully the US and China have both grown out of this.

    10. Re:My random observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to be clear, in my post I'm only criticizing the idea that Mao was an effective antidote to imperialism.

      The original complaint that Maoism was and is a great evil in the world is a separate statement, and is completely true.

      People are right to complain about the European program of colonialism, but the activities of Stalin and Mao are in a totally different class. In terms of sheer inhumanity, they were almost as ambitious as Hitler ... and had a longer time to carry out their atrocities.

    11. Re:My random observation by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Where does American Imperialism enter into all this? Or do still not consider US actions to be imperialistic?

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    12. Re:My random observation by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Whatever sins the various colonial powers may have comitted in China, they never imposed a policy of deliberately starving millions of peasants.

      Oh really... so all those Africans and Indias (in India) starving in the early 1900's weren't deliberate? How about purposely dividing up countries irrespective of ethnicities and cultures (particularly in the Middle East)?

      Of course none of those deaths can be attributed to capitalism, colonialism and imperialism, right?

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    13. Re:My random observation by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      The Chinese communists did (to their credit) succeed in pulling out of the Soviet orbit, so Mao did cast off outside interference. But it's not clear that their particular government was necessary or even useful in gaining independence. Taiwan is an example of how it could've been done differently, and at least as successfully.

      China didn't need the Communists to throw out the Imperliasts or any other foreigners--you can do it without any revolutions or system changes. However, what you are saying is misleading to a large extent. Taiwan NEVER gained "independence". The govt that fled to Taiwan (and hence ruled it alone, with US help) was an ally of Japanese Imperialists. In essence, the Chinese govt that fled to Taiwan was the remnant of the Japanese govt that invaded China.

      The reason Taiwain is democractic today has little to do with their original govt; the main reason Taiwain is democratic is because of USA. USA basically permitted and in some sense "forced" Taiwan to be democratic. USA had to do this to combat Communism. Whenever USA battled Communism, it has attempted to install plutocracy+capitalism (like itself). When USA carries out an action for imperialistic reasons, it usually installs some sort of authoratarian right-wing system, usually dictatorships (South America), or monarchies (Middle East).

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    14. Re:My random observation by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      The govt that fled to Taiwan (and hence ruled it alone, with US help) was an ally of Japanese Imperialists.

      What are you smoking? Chiang Kai-Shek and his nationalist government fought the Japanese for 8 years on the Chinese mainland. He was not a particularly nice guy, but he wasn't an ally of the Japanese.

      The reason Taiwain is democractic today has little to do with their original govt; the main reason Taiwain is democratic is because of USA. USA basically permitted and in some sense "forced" Taiwan to be democratic. USA had to do this to combat Communism.

      Taiwan remained under the rule of father-and-son dictators for decades, receiving US military aid for some 30 years. Martial law was lifted only in 1987, nearly forty years after Chiang Kai-Shek retreated to Taiwan. Since the Soviet Union fell in 1991, I think it's far more appropriate to say that the US did nothing for Taiwanese democracy until there was little to no communist threat.

    15. Re:My random observation by jcr · · Score: 1

      Oh really... so all those Africans and Indias (in India) starving in the early 1900's weren't deliberate?

      Since when are Africa and India in China?

      Of course none of those deaths can be attributed to capitalism, colonialism and imperialism, right?

      The last group that the Brits deliberately starved en masse were the Irish. And, to answer your attempt to package capitalism in with imperialism, keep in mind that: 1) nobody makes any money as a result of people starving to death, and 2) the last two colonial empires in the world is China.

      (The russians also had a colonial empire, but thanks to the fall of communism, Georgia, the Ukraine, Kazakhstan, the Balkans, and the rest of the countries that were under the Russian yoke have at least rid themselves of foreign domination.)

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    16. Re:My random observation by jcr · · Score: 1

      ) the last two colonial empires in the world is China.

      Umm, what I meant to say was that the last two colonial empires in the world were both Communist.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    17. Re:My random observation by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      ...1) nobody makes any money as a result of people starving to death, and 2) the last two colonial empires in the world is China....

      1. You CAN make money by starving people to death. In case you have forgetten, that's what slavery was all about. Granted, you can argue that the owners weren't trying to kill people but rather feed them the minimal but it's the same thing. Capitalism is no different. It is in the interest of the wealthy to keep the poor starving so they are dependent.

      2. I don't think Communism can be considered as colonialism. Colonialism requires colonies. The states under Communism aren't exactly colonies.

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    18. Re:My random observation by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of the earths natural resources will be be consumed to raise the standard of living for a quarter of the world's population.

      All those TVs, cars, underarm deoderants, houses, carpeting, computers etc.

      It will be interesting to see if they have enough water to even to get to 1/4th of our standard of living. Maybe the new dam will help.

      I am pretty sure they won't have enough trees to meet their wood and paper needs so the US and Canadians will accelarate logging to meet that need. In the short term big win for the west, in the long term well that's another post.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    19. Re:My random observation by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1
      THis was mentioned on NPR a few weeks ago.

      Basically the Earth can not support an American style economy in China. All the metal in the world could not bring them a car for 1.5 people and not a tree would be left if they consumed toilet paper and worked at office jobs like the US.

      We need warp drives now to expand our resources and look at other worlds. I know this is a pipe dream but I wonder how long it will take to make this a reality. Stephen Hawkings mentioned this as well when he said by 2600, all humans will be living shoulder to shoulder if we do not research and develop space technology.

      I just re-installed all my os's and lost some cool hyperlinks on this as well as the possibilty of tuna being extince in just 10 years! No joke. 90% of them are gone and the fishermen are just making bigger and bigger nets that now extend miles killing everything in its path.

      We are using way too many resources thanks to deregulation and an overcrowded population and economy.

    20. Re:My random observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100 years ago, those were the 1st world conditions.

    21. Re:My random observation by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      "We need warp drives now to expand our resources and look at other worlds. I know this is a pipe dream but I wonder how long it will take to make this a reality. Stephen Hawkings mentioned this as well when he said by 2600, all humans will be living shoulder to shoulder if we do not research and develop space technology."

      Gee why don't we try easier things first. Let's start with birth control.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    22. Re:My random observation by kikai+suki · · Score: 1

      Come on, don't be so patronising. People don't have to live in big houses in sprawling suburbs with two gas guzlers to be content. Contentment is in the heart/head and without it there no amount of "luxury" in the world is ever going to make anyone happy. Look in the mirror...Look around you. Let the Chinese and everyone be as they will.

    23. Re:My random observation by kikai+suki · · Score: 1

      Those "democratic" former colonies just happen to be of the European persuasion...

    24. Re:My random observation by benzapp · · Score: 1

      One other thing, 100 years ago, America was practically 3rd world in terms of labor conditions.

      The only place I can think of which had somewhat better conditions was Germany, which since the 1880's limited working hours and had a state pension plan. But even there, Germany was overpopulated and there were not many opportunities for the young. German immigration to the US was pretty solid up until WWI, and German ancestors are the largest group in America.

      But everywhere else was either just as bad or worse (see London... at least people weren't dying in the streets of NY on a minute by minute basis).

      Maybe compared to TODAY conditions in America were not the best.. but I would hardly call them third world. Look at how beautiful 19th century architecture is, or how people pay $1500 a month to live in a studio apartment in an old evil tenament in lower manhattan. Things really weren't that bad, and in some ways better I would say...

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    25. Re:My random observation by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 1

      "America started out as a handful of colonies ... if living/working conditions improve in China - it won't drive us back into the 3d world."

      100 years later, take a look at our parent country, England. Not to diss my Brit friends, but, while they obviously remain a 1st world economy, the UK just as obviously doesn't enjoy the same power and influence it once did. When the great European powers balanced each other, none was absolutely predominant, all myths about "Pax Brittanica" aside. In the Cold War, the two superpowers balanced each other. Now, in the age of "Pax Americana" (just as mythical), we have an unrivaled level of power and influence. If China gets its act together and starts to enact the same labor and social reforms that the US saw in the 19th and 20th centuries (strong labor unions, universal sufferage, more accountability in public officials, etc.) thereby encouraging economies of scale, a middle class and concommitant economic power, is there any doubt that the US's relative power will necessarily wane as China's waxes?

      100 years ago, would anyone have taken seriously a suggestion that the US would emerge to dramatically supercede the great world powers? Hell, in 1918-19, President Wilson was more or less patted on the head like a precocious child at Versailles. Now, in 2003, we're saying, "Oh look, the Chinese have made their very own little CPU, isn't that cute?"

      --
      The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
    26. Re:My random observation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you are the biggest moron I've EVER seen on the Internet...

  21. Re:1-800-759-0700 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF!?

    STFU Spammer!! >:(

    [Dexter]You Are Stuuupid! You are STUUUUPID!![/Dexter]

  22. MADE IN USA by foxhound01 · · Score: 1, Funny

    They will undoubtedly be stamped MADE IN USA on the underside of the chip...its cheaper for them, cuz the US owns all of the sweatshops in china

    --


    Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    1. Re:MADE IN USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This might have been funny had your logic not been flawed. MADE IN USA implies that the manufacturing plant is in the United States of America. Were it to be made in a sweatshop in China, it wouldn't be produced in the USA, now would it? I'm sure you giggled your little heart out thinking about how clever you were.

    2. Re:MADE IN USA by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      It is meant that it COULD NOT be built in a sweatshop in china, since they are all under American control, whereas imported labor in the US is more readily available to the chinese.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    3. Re:MADE IN USA by quinkin · · Score: 1
      Anyone else ever looked up some of the whacky manufacturing towns?

      Like Switzerland - a small town built around a watch factory (It will say Made in Switzerland, whereas a real one will say Swiss Made).

      You have to admire their resourcefulness. :)

      Q.

      --
      Insert Signature Here
    4. Re:MADE IN USA by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

      i've also heard of a town in japan (i think it was japan at least) called Usa, and they made items that said made in USA on them, that is until someone in the US Trade office realized this and forbid it anymore.

      --


      Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
    5. Re:MADE IN USA by thisgooroo · · Score: 1
      you never heard of those cases where manufacturers imported complete suits and then sew labels "made in ..."? the labels actually were made in ..., and because the label was sen in in ..., the finsished product was legally considered made there.

      when siemens abandoned the 1st generation computers, they licensed their new (ibm360 class) machines from rca. the first dozen or so systems were completely made by rca, except for the name plate (i don't know whether there was also a "made in germany" stamped on it; the name plate certainly was made there).

      don't put too much trust in these labels. often they are nothing more than a marketing ploy

  23. Re:OH no. American companies are sooo ARFRAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You, sir, are an idiot.

  24. Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looks like there'll be an alternative when all Intel and AMD are producing are Palladium chipsets and you'd rather not be "trusted" by Big Corps...

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by spoonboy42 · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'd like to say that it's pretty damn ironic that the PRC would be the source of the world's only free (as in freedom) microprocessor architecture, given the pretty horrendous record that the chinese government has regarding freedom of expression, dissent, etc. That said, despite my distaste for the governement (which is *slowly*, but somewhat consistently, reforming), I do have a great admiration for the Chinese people and their cultural, scientific, and technological achievements, and if China can produce the next uppity underdog of the CPU world (think AMD's K6), then more power to them. And bonus points if the thing stays DRM-free (which isn't a sure thing. You might just be "trusted" by the government instead of big corporations).

      One thing we ought to remember, though, is that the chip is RISC-based (no word on which subset of the RISC family, though), and thus binary-incompatible with x86, x86-64, and Itanium/Merced (all CISC) software. Of course, we can assume that Linux and other multiplatform free OSes will be highly source-compatible with the new platform, but then again, it's quite unlikely that any of those OSes would move in a pro-DRM direction (and, of course, a DRM-free fork could always be developed). If you want to run commercial apps, though, your only option on the Dragon is emulation, which is going to be vastly more complex when a Palladium-type architecture has to be emulated or faked as well.

      That said, I think I may have an idea for how a truly free architecture might be developed: software-defined CPUs. Transmeta's crusoe is one example of this sort of technology. A small, simple VLIW processor core could "run" what, externally, appears to be an x86, Dragon, or practically anything else on top of itself. If someone designed such a chip with freely available documentation, it would be MUCH easier for hobbyist developers to create and maintain computing architectures without draconian IP restrictions. It would even, conceivably, be possible to write a virtual processor that emulates DRM functionality externally to commercial software, but protects the user's privacy at a level that is not visible to system software. Or, you can just use free software and not worry about all that, focusing instead on building a kick-ass virtual processor architecture, which is itself protected from DRM in the same way that OSS is.

      --
      Anonymous Luddite: "What do you think of the dehumanizing effects of the Internet?"
      Andy Grove: "Not Much."
    2. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > it's pretty damn ironic that the PRC would be the source of the world's only free (as in freedom) microprocessor architecture

      Actually, not. The LEO's a SPARC clone for quite some time now, and OTOH I haven't seen a word yet on the freedom relative to the Dragon.

      > the chip is RISC-based (no word on which subset of the RISC family, though), and thus binary-incompatible with x86

      Not necessarily so. The Alpha could run x86 binaries, and at the time at equivalent speeds even if the OS was biased to the x86. And word is that the chip has a RISC core, as has the x86 since i80486 times... havn't seen no word yet on if it'll actually be RISC (as in interface).

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    3. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by mdxi · · Score: 1

      Actually, SPARC is a very open architecture. Existing SPARC CPUs are specific implementations of one of the reference SPARC design (v7,v8,v9). Commercially, Fujitsu and Sun design and make SPARCs, but INRIA has also produced one, a radiation-hardened design called the Leon, for use in ESA unmanned probes.

      All you need is the skill to design a specific implementation, a fab, and the money and materiel to put it into production :)

      --
      Posted with Mozilla
    4. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Palladium will be disableable, and even if it weren't, it would not prevent you from doing anything you do today.

      I'm amazed a post based on ignorance, perpetuating falsities, would be modded insightful. The lunatics are running the asylum.

    5. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See this post for my justifictaion to buy a Chinese chip over a "Trusted Computing hell" chip.

    6. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Huh? What?

      First of all, this isn't an X86 processor, so it's not like it'll be compatible with what most people are using now...

      If you are using some open source operating system... Great! But in that case, why even bother with this new, slow processor, when there are tons of alternative processors that are faster, cheaper, lower-power, etc? It's not likely that the gov would ever mandate that server products would be required to have DRM, so you'd just might have to buy parts under the table, or start your own phantom company to get some products.

      Besides that, why would you want to depend on China and their wimpy processor, when Korea, Taiwan, Japan and Germany (probably others as well) already have some of the best manufacturing plants in the world, and will be out of reach of US laws? Just take a nice trip to Germany... Fill your suitcase with nothing but Levis', pawn them off, and come back with a suitcase full of AMD processors.

      Plus, what about the old, fast processors? You can stick with x86 for a good long time, just as long as you buy maybe 3 identical systems up-front, and then scrap the others to keep one working. That's pretty much what you see in Cuba with their cars from the 1950's... Since they can't get new ones, they repair the old ones.

      I'm rather sure power-supplies won't be DRM-ed, and if they are, they are trivially made by anyone with some basic electrical skills... So what do you have to maintain?

      Motherboard: Good ones like Asus/MSI will work practically forever.

      Processor: With a good mobo, and cooling, it'll last for decades, no problem.

      Sound Card: Never had a single one fail, if it had ever been functioning (1 or 2, out of several thousand, have come defective from the factory).

      Video Cards: Good brands, and with adequate cooling (like a large heatsink or reliable fan) will work forever.

      Hard Drives and CD/DVD Recorders : Good SCSI models can work for over a decade without a problem, so stock-up! Get 10 and you'll be fine for at least the next 100 years...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    7. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      "Looks like there'll be an alternative when all Intel and AMD are producing are Palladium chipsets"

      Possibly not from IBM

    8. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But, there already is an alternative, it's called Apple ... and they have this new G5 machine...

    9. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's what they say now. Ever follow the news? Watch how fast the stories change.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    10. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I don't want to be stuck with a 2-3Ghz processor for the rest of my life. Nor do I want to be stuck with the harddrive size that is out today for the rest of my life. Also, CD/DVD recorders are going to jump in speed astronomically over time. I don't want to be stuck with a 32x burner the rest of my life, either.

      The difference between the cars from the 50's and computers today is pretty obvious. Look at computers in the 50's compared to computers today, versus cars from the 50's compared to cars of today. They go about the same speed (well, with obvious exceptions), and cars back then were easier to work on.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    11. Re:Escape from "Trusted Computing" hell? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      I don't want to be stuck with a 2-3Ghz processor for the rest of my life

      So you'd rather be stuck with a dragon chip, that is a tiny fraction of that speed?

      Maintaining old equipment was just one option. Frankly, I would be happy with a currently top-of-the-line system for decades. My non-multimedia work can be handled by a 486 processor, and all I use my high-end multimedia machine for is to convert my DVDs to MPEG4 so they can be backed-up to CD, to record TV signals to MPEG4 files and record them to CD, and some CD-ripping, etc... Current processors are fast enough to do real-time encoding of HDTV to MPEG4 (or perhaps Theora when it is finished), so as long as HDTV doesn't change, I'd be all set, and perfectly happy.

      We are at a technological plateau right now unlike anything seen in the short history of computers. Never before were computers fast enough to process anything you could see (audio, video, etc) and had infinite (eg. removable) cheap storage thanks to CD/DVD Recording. Technology will advance, but it probably won't be until holographic video gets popular that a computer will need to be seriously upgraded to be able to handle the task.

      Besides, that was just one option from about 3 I believe I listed.

      CD/DVD recorders are going to jump in speed astronomically over time.

      Very little chance of that... CD drives have already surpassed the maximum speeds that CDs can handle, and DVDs are rapidly approaching that same limit.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  25. My mother is enormous... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but I don't see anyone basing an economy off of her. Unless you count McDonalds.

  26. A japanese shirt doesnt make you japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they wrote an article about you...

    http://maddox.xmission.com/anime_nerd.html

  27. Site too slow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In James Kirk Voice,"Site too slow, loosing interest, will by from Intel instead. Spock, I love you."

    1. Re:Site too slow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      losing* buy*

      I'll give you credit for getting 'too' right. You should consider taking a 5th grade english class.

    2. Re:Site too slow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should consider taking a 5th grade Chinese class. Oh "by" the way, English is capitalized.

  28. the million dollar question is by f00zbll · · Score: 0

    is it fast enough to write a letter and surf the web? Will it mean fewer sales in China and the other Asian countries? Yup. Will it hurt AMD or Intel? Don't know, but I'm sure we'll all find out with time.

  29. Re:OH no. American companies are sooo ARFRAID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Another point is that the reason most companies leave for China is because of the SLAVE labore wages."

    That sounds like a reason for most companies to flock to China, not leave it.

    Of course, the workers should be fleeing, but they very well can't now, can they? ;)

  30. Interestingly enough by mackinaugh · · Score: 1

    (from the Company Overview -> History portion of their website)

    It seems that in 1975 "The Comic of "Little Rogues" was renamed as "Dragon and Tiger Heroes" and became the best sales of fighting comics in Hong Kong. "

    I never knew.

  31. Re:Now comes with an extra instruction too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Please drink a bottle of bleach ...

    OK, I did. But now I don't feel so good. I hope you didn't trick me!

  32. Why should US trade by these rules? by tjstork · · Score: 2, Insightful


    If the Chinese government can go around propping up Chinese industries until American businesses get torched and American workers get laid off, then why do it?

    I mean, what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade when everyone else, including American importers, are using it to crush Americans at home.

    F---- free trade.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Syncdata · · Score: 1

      First off, Hold your horses. The chinese government is not the only government that props up staggering/nascent business. Would you say that The US government giving money to Lockheed Martin to develop the next generation in fighter aircraft, as opposed to say, ordering 500 migs or sukkhois is protectionist? Of course not.
      Free trade has nothing to do with this scenario. Now if the chinese government levies tarriffs against Intel and AMD, then you may have something. But up and untill then, this is simply government bolstering regional business, which is not at all bad form.
      Interestingly enough, you are arguing that the US have a copyright in purpituity on the Microprocessor. I never thought I'd see the day THAT particular argument was posted to slashdot.

      --
      "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    2. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by buffer-overflowed · · Score: 1

      Another good example is steel.

      --
      The key to the enjoyment of pop music is to replace any instance of "love" with "C.H.U.D."
    3. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by AceM2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Defense spending is not exactly typical regional business.. You could have at least used a better example ;P

    4. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Tomble · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Sorry, but I can't stand back from this. You may or may not be a troll, I believe you're not. Either way, sod it, I'm biting:
      F---- free trade.
      I can certainly empathise with that sentiment- all free trade really gives the world is unnaturally cheap goods; Cheap stuff is great, but what's the point if next-to noone can afford them (due to all the jobs going to slave owners and sweat-shops), and/or we all effectively become slaves ourselves? One or the other of these will naturally be the eventual outcome.

      But,

      I mean, what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade
      Unless I somehow misunderstood who you meant, you are in fact, saying that America believes in free trade.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

      Wait a moment, that actually isn't funny. Certainly not to the countries that ROT due to American (and yes, European too, I'll freely admit) double-standards on the free trade thing. America does sort of believe in free trade, but only when it serves its own interests. Otherwise, America believes America First. Policy speaks louder than words here, I'm afraid.

      The best solution is for everybody to agree quite clearly, that unfettered free trade is a fucking stupid idea, and that NOBODY should be forced to submit themselves to free trade agreements in the way that many 3rd world countries have been forced to before they were allowed vital foreign aid.

      --
      Be careful! New moon tonight.
    5. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Varitek · · Score: 1
      I mean, what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade when everyone else, including American importers, are using it to crush Americans at home
      Yeah, tell us another. The US is just as likely as any country to use "free trade" arguments as a hammer to hit other countries while all the time implementing steel tarrifs, or lumber tarriffs, or ethanol subsidies, or agricultural subsidies.
    6. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by GenSolo · · Score: 1

      Are the new Chinese processors superior to the processors we have? Also, aren't our existing fighters superior to migs and sukkhois anyway? Funding Lockheed Martin is called R&D research. It's an investment in air superiority. That has nothing to do with the Chinese building microprocessors.

    7. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you but China is doing EXACTLY the same thing that USA does.

      Yeah, fuck free trade... but first you need to realize that USA is the proponent of free trade. After all, what did you expect from the flag-bearer of capitalism?

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    8. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      If the Chinese government can go around propping up Chinese industries until American businesses get torched and American workers get laid off, then why do it?

      First you need to figure out who benefits from free trade. Free trade, in essence, is the lowering of international trade barriers like tariffs and various import bans or restrictions. The immediate effect of free trade is a bigger market for those with something to sell and can effectively compete anywhere. The obvious beneficiary is one who has the economy of scale.

      This seems fair, until you realize that the western powers have decades and decades of headstart, while many third world countries are still struggling to even get agricultural revolution going. Third world businesses lack many of the skills and capital required to compete at the scale forced upon them. They will largely be crushed one by one by American and other other western corporations that can afford much more in R&D because they sell so many more units. Without protectionism, these third world companies have to face the full wrath of well-heeled competitors before they are ready.

      So, just maybe, the American worker and the Chinese entrepreneur are not really enemies.

    9. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Two words:

      Canadian Lumber

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    10. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Arandir · · Score: 1

      What free trade? The US certainly doesn't believe in it. The more accurate description would be "micromanaged trade". Just because the politicians talk about free trade, and put those words in the titles of treaties, doesn't mean that it actually exists here.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    11. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      The best solution is for everybody to agree quite clearly, that unfettered free trade is a fucking stupid idea, and that NOBODY should be forced to submit themselves to free trade agreements in the way that many 3rd world countries have been forced to before they were allowed vital foreign aid.

      Oh, for Christ's sake.

      The 3rd world countries are being paid to implement free trade. If they can make more money out of "un-free" trade, they can go right ahead and do that for all I care.

      But if they're taking my government's money, then they shouldn't whine when my goverment sets conditions. They can just say "no", suck it up, and let us get back to paying off our debt, you know...

    12. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >...what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade...

      This is the same America that is screwing up world agriculture wth subsidies isn't it?

    13. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I mean, what's the point of being the only nation in town that believes in free trade when everyone else, including American importers, are using it to crush Americans at home.
      If taxpayers in another country subsidize the stuff that I buy, this "crushes" me?
    14. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by gotan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US is aggressiveley pursuing their own economical benefits. Organisations like WTO try (and in most cases succeed) to dictate how to do trade, and these "free market" rules greatly benefit US-corporations or more generally "global players". Other governments are cajoled by any means to accept rules set forth bye those global players, but those rules are not about fair trade, they are about unregulated trade. OTOH when it comes to IP the US propagate a very rigid system that only serves to maintain the status quo. One of the most ridiculous examples of this is patenting rice genes and selling rice seeds for breeds that before said patenting were free to everyone. The patent system is actually a very good example: Why should other countries accept US-IP-laws when they only serve to hamper their own economy and drain loads of money from those countries into the pockets of US-corporations. Japan did very well ignoring those IP-laws and getting their economy up, and the US of A ignored IP-laws too when it was convenient.

      So why should a country like China play by a set of rules that have mostly negative effects on their economy, and why shouldn't a country be allowed to boost their own economy? People seem to have forgotten that the job of a government is to care for their people, not for the welfare of multinational corporations.

      What i said here about the USA holds true for most "rich" capitalistic countries and is more the doing of huge corporations than of any specific country, but the US also leverage their economical power to put pressure on other countries by means of embargoes or cutting development aids. And last but not least President Bush messing with the Microsoft trial to get one of the largest US-corporations out of their legal troubles scot-free is another very fine example of protectionism.

      --
      "By the way if anyone here is in advertising or marketing... kill yourself." -- Bill Hicks
    15. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by canadian_right · · Score: 1
      The USA does NOT believe in free trade. The USA has slapped huge tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber (in BC alone, thousands have lost their jobs due to the US tariffs - the same tariffs that were found to be illegal by the WTO the last time the USA did this), huge tariffs on steel, gives huge subsidies to their farmers, a multitude of other tariffs aimed at blocking poor countries food and textile imports to the USA. The USA only believes in freetrade when they are winning. The second anyone undercuts them, or becomes more efficient the USA strikes back. Corporate welfare is alive and well in the USA.

      For a real eye opener look look up "United Fruit company bananas tariff" on google.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    16. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by tnak · · Score: 1

      No one really believes in free trade. They're all for free trade until it hits them in the pocketbook.

      Look at the Senate and House with the farm bill.

      Hell, look at farmers. They want subsidies out the ying yang. I live in north central Pennsylvania where they have minimum prices for milk. 30 miles north of here, it's 30% cheaper.

    17. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Candian lumber.

      South American coffee.

    18. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      I'm always tired of hearing about farm subsidies as some horrible restraint of free-trade and capitalism. The US farm markets have been destroyed by the Warmarts of the world--first by destroying the value of the products farmers make, then by taking advantage of the economic situation of farmers to build more malls.

      The US Govt subsidizes foodstuffs because the free-market has failed. Most people don't realize that large portions of the US have been in drought conditions for several years now. If the free-market had it's way there wouldn't be enough food to go around!!! Unless of course you really want to be like the rest of the world and spend 60-80% of your income on food to survive, stop dogging farm subsidies.

      The only real "crime" involved is that subsidies allow the mass-market capitalists to continue to abuse the system and keep prices artifically low in the US...good for everyone except farmers.

      The surplus food the US has is just a bonus of the policy, not an attempt to hurt anyone. After all, Why should people starve when we really do have more than enough. [we can afford to give it to them, but we don't] But it's true, it can wreck an agrian economy.

    19. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      "Most people don't realize that large portions of the US have been in drought conditions for several years now. If the free-market had it's way there wouldn't be enough food to go around!!!"

      That makes no sense at all. I can't even guess at the point you're trying to make.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    20. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1
      Every time free-trade comes up, someone mentions farm subsidies that the US gives their farmers. The policy was made after the depression which was partially caused by a huge drought [dust belt anyone?] due to horrible farmimg practices of the time that decimated thousands of farms in the midwest. My local farmers have had 1-2 thirds of their crops wiped out by drought [mid-michigan if you have to ask, we've been running about 5"-12" of rain short for several years now] in recent years, yet my cost at the supermarket has not risen accordingly--not because of lack of foreign competion, but because US policy is to pay farmers to stay in the game--even at a loss--so we never run out of food.

      Stability of food prices is one of the fundamental reasons for US corperate success, you can worry about the price of CD & DVD being inflated instead of where your next meal is comming from. The fact that the US can "dump" huge amouts of food on the world market is a good/bad thing.

      As far as about the Dragon processor [hey let's get on topic!] the free trade arguement really doesn't apply. After all, it was "free-trade" that let the US companies take all the jobs and equipment from the US to Taiwan, and "free-trade" that let the Taiwanise board-makers relocate to the mainland. Now China has the tools to build their own Chip fabs bought by judiceously skimming the profits and talent from the American companies looking for "cheap" labor. Now the Corperate heads themselves are looking at being put out of work...just like they did to the rest of us. They taught us really, really well to buy the cheapest no matter what!

    21. Re:Why should US trade by these rules? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Well, I can think of a good reason why the US shoud protect it's food industry. If we start importing most of our food, then we become very VERY vunerable to other countries.

      It's just foolish. The whole country could collaspe because someone decided to sink all the food transport ships.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  33. Isn't this... by Schnapple · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...the chip Dvorak said was rumored to be like slower than a 486 chip? The one that was total crap but the Chinese government was all happy about it since they had control over it?

    Reminds me of the line: "If you had let the government come up with the cure to Polio, you'd have the best iron lung in the world but you'd be no closer to a vaccine."

    1. Re:Isn't this... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      wouldn't this be the vaccine(trying to fix the problem of being dependant on western superpowers) and buying western chips be the iron lung(just getting by..)..

      seems to me that the chinese gov is getting few of both worlds here(the opteron supercomputer they're getting). chinese gov has done some pretty horrible mistakes in the past though(and doing some currently) where it seems all sense of big picture had been lost while making 'smart' governing decisions("populate as fast as you can!", "use every time to refine iron" and other moves that were worthless and lead to millions of people dying of hunger for nothing because there wasn't enough governing put on the right things, like making sure there is enough food).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Isn't this... by rsheridan6 · · Score: 1
      From some website that has a biography of Jonas Salk:
      In 1947, Salk accepted an appointment to the University of Pittsburgh Medical School While working there, with the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, Salk saw an opportunity to develop a vaccine against polio, and devoted himself to this work for the next eight years.

      In 1955 Salk's years of research paid off. Human trials of the polio vaccine effectively protected the subject from the polio virus. When news of the discovery was made public on April 12, 1955, Salk was hailed as a miracle worker.

      He was working with the two institution listed in boldface, both government institutions, when he cured polio. That's the way a very large proportion of research (and infrastructure) is developed. But never mind the facts, if they don't fit in with a knee-jerk belief that government is bad.
      --
      Don't drop the soap, Tommy!
    3. Re:Isn't this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He was working with the two institution listed in boldface, both government institutions

      That is incorrect. From some website describing a few activities of the founder of the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis :
      The Birthday Balls continued to generate approximately one million dollars per year, but the revenue was still not sufficient to support the National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, created by Franklin Roosevelt in 1938 as a national organization to help victims of polio all across the country and not just in Warm Springs. To heighten awareness, radio personality and philanthropist Eddie Cantor urged Americans to send their loose change to President Roosevelt in "a march of dimes to reach all the way to the White House." Soon, millions of dimes flooded the White House, and this campaign became known as the "March of Dimes;" in 1945 the Foundation raised 18.9 million dollars. The National Foundation for Infantile Paralysis, took the name of its popular campaign to become the March of Dimes. The funds raised by the Birthday Balls and March of Dimes financially supported the creation of a polio vaccine by Jonas Salk in 1955, eradicating the disease throughout most of the world by the 1960s.
      In other words, the Foundation to which you refer was created by the President of the US, but he was acting as a private individual, the foundation ran on private funds, and it was not any kind of a government institution.

      Your confusion is understandable, what with the National Science Foundation and all. But the US government did not really get involved with funding non-military research until Sputnik.

      I personally am paid through funds that come mostly from the Department of Energy, and I'm inclined to agree with your point.

      But I think the original poster's idea was not that the government shouldn't fund these things -- but rather, that large centrally planned programs are much worse than smaller programs which explore different avenues, which have to compete for a limited amount of funding, and which have to justify their existence from time to time.

      Well, maybe that's not quite what the original poster had in mind, but it is what I think.
    4. Re:Isn't this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p.s. Just in case it isn't clear, having "National" in a name does not mean that a thing is sponsored by the federal government.

      e.g., the National Football League is an American institution, but is not a government institution (I hope)

    5. Re:Isn't this... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      and if corporations came out with the polio vaccine, you would have an easy to take treatment, but no cure.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:Isn't this... by muleboy · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the line: "If you had let the government come up with the cure to Polio, you'd have the best iron lung in the world but you'd be no closer to a vaccine."
      That's funny, because I know more than a little bit about the economics of drug companies (having seen plenty of presentations by people that work at them on their economics and business strategies while in a class based on creating a drug industry business plan). Turns out, drug companies nearly always prefer drugs that treat, but not cure, disease. This gives them a nice long steady stream of revenue.

      People funded by the NIH, on the other hand, choose their research based on what is interesting and rewarding for them and likely to get continued funding.

      Personally, I think you need both, but a lot of the fundamental research that leads to cures and not just revenue-generating treatments comes from government funding, not private industry.

  34. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by MuParadigm · · Score: 1


    The Dragon site is real slow, and there aren't even a hundred posts in this topic yet.

    I hope that isn't representative of the technology.

    The 1 GB limit on memory kind of worried me. Is that a system limit (i.e. motherboard) or is it that the chip has only 30 bit addressing? Seems kind of odd.

    Also, is this a system that will be affordable for the average worker in mainland China? Does anyone know?

  35. Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibetans by reporter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    For a country that is as backward as mainland China, possessing the ability to make a high-performance 32-bit pipelined microprocessor is a tad surprising. However, when you think of the intimate relationship between Taiwan and mainland China, you realize that the technology for the Dragon microprocessor came from Taiwan. So, things are not that surprising.

    Consider the following.

    1. The constitution of the Chinese living in Taiwan supports the integration of both Tibet and Mongolia into mainland China. While Tibetans suffer and die at the hands of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, the Chinese in Taiwan support integrating Tibet into "One China".
    2. The Chinese son of the chairman of a powerful conglomerate in Taiwan has joined with the son of Jiang Zemin, the butcher of Tibet, to build an advanced silicon-wafer factory in Shanghai. (reference: "Sons of prominent Chinese team up on chip venture")
    3. Senior Chinese military officials retired from the Taiwanese military have gone to mainland China and given military secrets about the American F-16 fighter jet to the Beijing government. (reference: "Military secrets on sale to China")
    4. The Wall Street Journal reports that the majority of American spies who steal sensitive computer and military technology (like microprocessor blueprints) to give to mainland China are actually born and raised in Taiwan. Both spies mentioned in "Two Men Arrested for Planning to Smuggle High-Tech Encryption Devices to China" are born and raised in Taiwan.

    In other words, we Americans should blame ourselves. Why? American companies, especially those in Silicon Valley, employ hordes of Chinese from Taiwan. When they are given lucrative opportunities in mainland China, they will seize those opportunities. Some of those opportunities involve giving sensitive American technology to Beijing. We did this to ourselves; we made it easy for the Taiwanese to give American technology to Beijing.

    This hemorrhaging of technology will continue until we in the United States of America (USA) wake up. We should treat Taiwan as a province of China. When we slap punitive sanctions against China, we should also apply those sanctions against Taiwan. If we do not want to give sensitive technology to China, then we should not give sensitive technology to Taiwan. Period.

    Several companies in Silicon Valley prohibit Chinese nationals from working on technologies deemed sensitive by the American government. Yet, those very same companies readily employ Taiwanese nationals to work on the same sensitive technologies. Folks, let's wake up before the fire-breathing dragon burns us Americans along with the Tibetans.

  36. Not really when M$ is dumping in places like China by jbottero · · Score: 1

    a copy of Windows XP would take the average paddy field worker six months to earn

    I seem to recall that Microsoft dumps Windows in countries like Thailand and China at a tiny fraction of the US cost, to discurage Linux and piracy...

  37. Dragon Tank Ready by xsfo · · Score: 1

    Dragon Tank Ready It's Hot In Here...

    1. Re:Dragon Tank Ready by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      Adjusting Gas Valve! Pressure levels set!

  38. Nice SoC design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    V-Dragon is an embedded chip, it has an integrated memory controller (supporting 1GB of SDRAM), USB controller, 10/100Mbps Ethernet and PCI controller. Since everything you need is integrated on the CPU, it makes motherboards very simple.

    It won't be very fast, but it should be more than enoug for web-browsing and text-editing.

    1. Re:Nice SoC design by iendedi · · Score: 1

      It doesn't need to be fast, at least in it's first incarnation. Expect this chip to be revised quickly and become competitive in a few years.

      China always takes the long view... That is why they will become such a fierce competitior as time passes...

      --

      It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
    2. Re:Nice SoC design by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      Actually this would be an excellent chip for a firewall/router box. Expect to see this in the next generation of broadband routers. It would also be nice for handhelds. I don't like the Chinese's human rights record. Only North Korea and Burma make my skin crawl more. But it's interesting nonetheless.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    3. Re:Nice SoC design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple cultures without an educated middle class are incapable of useful democracy, and therefore require a benevolent dictatorship until they evolve.
      Compared with the collapse of Russia, the Chinese methods are laudable.
      Economics/food is more important than the freedom to starve.

    4. Re:Nice SoC design by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Only North Korea and Burma make my skin crawl more.

      hmm... how about USA and its buddies, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Colombia, et al? I guess you are happy with what's happening there eh? :(

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    5. Re:Nice SoC design by MsGeek · · Score: 1
      hmm... how about USA and its buddies, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Colombia, et al? I guess you are happy with what's happening there eh? :(

      I think I just had East Asia on the brain when I was writing that. Yes, we have lots of problems right here at home. The Islamic world is full of human (and particularly female human) abuses.

      Colombia is a nasty situation that has grown even worse because of our intervention. Thank the War On Drugs (tm) for that. And yes, both GOP and Democratic administrations have been guilty of hyping the drug war since back in LBJ's day, so neither party's hands are clean there.

      There are lots of human rights abuses to go around in the world. The acquittal of one of the cops in the Inglewood, CA, US police abuse case and the failure to convict on the other is a fresh reminder that we still have a long way to go here.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    6. Re:Nice SoC design by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      I think I just had East Asia on the brain when I was writing that.

      oh... sorry about that... I thought you were referring to everything, and "conveniently" ignored certain realties like many Americans do. I'm glad to see that you haven't done that :)

      As far as the cop case in California is concerned... well, it's going to be interesting to see how it turns out. I don't really know if the police officer is "guilty" (he claims that the kid grabbed his groin). I don't know whose story to believe but the real impact will be after the next court case (ie. on appeal). That could turn nasty...

      Just read your journal (at least scanned through it). Here are my thoughts...don't know if you care but you are going to get it anyway :):

      * Based on your thoughts, it seems that you are left wing and yet it seems like you vote for the Liberatarian party. I'm thinking the Green Party would be more aligned with your goals (of course, I know neither your stance on issues nor the ideals of US parties)...

      * As far as the Davis re-election thingie is concerned, at least California seems to have some element of democracy. I have never heard of a country/province/city ever recalling anyone in any part of the world so it can only be good. I don't think anything remotely similar is allowed in 90% of the world (of course, I could be wrong). Kind of costly but it is more democratic IMO.

      * As far as the budget crisis is concerned, it is truly pathetic. One of the largest economies in the world (not to mention richest; in contrast to economies like China which are large but not rich) ending up with a massive deficit would be laughable if it weren't sad. Granted, the dot-com bust didn't help at all but still... I hope you guys get your stuff sorted out

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  39. No biggy. U.S. Fab facilities will crush it by bobo333 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I want to see real benchmarks before i rag on it but i can tell you that making chips is not like making HOTWHEELS. The big FABS in the U.S. are on more even ground since this isn't about dirt cheap labor that makes a product.

  40. That's neat and all.. by KalvinB · · Score: 1, Redundant

    But does it run Windows?

    Ben

    1. Re:That's neat and all.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, I hope so! Otherwise the Chinese will be passing us technologically at something like light-speed!

  41. slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    you do realise that slashdotting a chinese national website is a capital crime in mainland china, don't you?

    1. Re:slashdotted already by suraklin · · Score: 1

      Good thing most of us are not in mainland china ;)

    2. Re:slashdotted already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nonsense

  42. What kind of chip is it? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0, Troll
    I thought it was an alpha based on earlier slashdot comments. Later everyone has been stating that its mips based.

    I am curious because I would love to see tha alpha live. Its the best chip in the world and would remain the fastest if Intel/HP would not care more about the sunken costs of this engineering disaster of Itanium. Not to sound like a troll but it was due in 97 and is 2 billion over budget. No wonder HP/Intel canceled the next generation of the Alpha.

  43. Ok, if the Chinese workers paid same by tjstork · · Score: 1


    But they aren't.

    I've been hearing about the benefits about free trade since I voted for Reagan, twice, and I'm still waiting, as first manufacturing moved over seas, then simple services, and now more complex services. What's left in the US?

    --
    This is my sig.
  44. Well- by nightsweat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one would like to welcome our new Chinese overlords...

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  45. But... by dracvl · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...will it run my Dragon32 code?

  46. The point ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    being that you dont know very much about chips :)

    1. Re:The point ... by psyconaut · · Score: 1

      I design embedded systems for a living....I probably know more about "chips" than most...what's your point?

      -psy

    2. Re:The point ... by uradu · · Score: 1

      > I design embedded systems for a living

      Then you would also know that embedded micros outnumber desktop CPUs by orders of magnitude. And many of those are produced both in Japan and Europe, IOW outside the US. And most of the memory is not designed let alone produced here. So in fact the US has pretty much only desktop CPU gloating rights.

  47. Yet Another Chinese "Opportunity" Evaporates by istartedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is part of a trend. Everybody thought China would be this wide open market. All these people were salivating at the prospect of a billion customers. They all forgot that China is so big that they are likely to muster the ability to do it themselves. The same thing has already happened with cell phones.

    This also reminds me of a conversation I had in the early 90s with a room-mate who was an avid Free Trader. Me: "Why are we compromising our principles with China. We don't need them". Him: "We don't need them? They don't need us!". Me: "That's loser talk!". Him: "You're hopelessly backward and provincial...".

    In retrospect, we were probably both right; at least on the first exchange. We don't need China. They don't need us. Sheesh! Why is Slashdot such a dog lately. It won't let me preview posts...

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  48. EETimes article by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    EETimes has an article on this. They note:

    Culturecom Holdings Ltd., a publisher of Chinese language "fighting" comics that migrated into information technology in the 1990s, has begun selling its V-Dragon microprocessor for use in Chinese PCs.

    That's almost like vivendi-universal going from a water utility to a multimedia giant! Is there some new business strategy for totally changing industries that I should be aware of?

    They also note:

    The V-Dragon CPU incorporates support for Chinese-language characters, according to the company.

    Wow, I wonder what that means... optimized U16 support? Or is it marketing-speak?

    EEtimes also notes that 300,000 chips have already been sold or have letters of intent to be sold.

    1. Re:EETimes article by theotherfish · · Score: 1

      There's a bit more info on that aspect here

    2. Re:EETimes article by sniggly · · Score: 1

      Nokia used to be a logging company. They started to make communications eqpt that could survive the Finnish climate to keep remote logging ops in contact. The rest is history :)

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    3. Re:EETimes article by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1
      Is there some new business strategy for totally changing industries that I should be aware of?

      It's called "diversification", and isn't very new at all. It's a way of making sure your company stays afloat if its original business model becomes obsolete for some reason.

      Someone else mentioned Nokia. There are a few other Japanese examples. Nintendo began selling playing cards. Toyota began life as the Toyoda Automatic Loom Works. In the US, Philip Morris, one of the leading tobacco companies, has morphed into The Altria Group encompassing brands like Nabisco, Maxwell House, and Kraft.

      Large companies do this kind of thing all the time. There's no reason to be surprised when you see it.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:EETimes article by Jonavin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like it's got some built-in character generator.

      Able to generate more than 32,000 (extensible to > 50,000)Traditional and Simplified Chinese characters and sizes ranging from 11 x 11 to 127 x 127 pixels
      Capable of generating 3 different kinds of font types (Ming, Black, Round)

      Less processing power is required than for solutions using TrueType fonts

      Less memory is required than for solutions using pre-composed bitmap fonts

  49. obigatory SCO comment by RevMike · · Score: 1
    It offered a tremendous amount of promise, but it just never got updated (circa 2001) - egh!

    On the other hand, it is free of the IP that SCO claims IBM stole and contributed.

    In this way Chinese programmers can spend more time coding instead of cursing McBride.

  50. "In line with the Chinese government's IT policy" by rocky28 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did anybody else here read the article?

    Did this line send shivers down your spine?

    While I applaud the effort to give cheap computing to the underpriviliged masses in China, this may be cause for concern

    The fact that a government that still seems to be fairly interested in tramping on all forms of dissidence is involved enough with the OS and hardware so that it falls "in line with the Chinese government's IT policy", makes me a little nervous.

    This isn't unusual, MS has always tailored their products so that they fit in with the IT policies of western nations. But from what I have read, China has a somewhat different IT policy to many Western nations.

    An IT policy which drives everything underground, away from the policing ears.

  51. If they don't start a WAR with Taiwan. Maybe. by bobo333 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I would hope some of you can read this before Slashdot Censors mod this down to Flamebait.

    China is a ruthless communist dictatorship. They don't believe in bilateral trade. They are a parasitic trading country like alot of the ASIAN nations. They lure stupid American companies in the belief that with the lure of dirt cheap labor they will hit the gold mine. They forget that China is making moves to conquer another asian country . Also know that most of Chinese wealth can be attributed to allowing the brutal dictatorship free access to American markets while doing very little reciprical trade with the U.S. Why do we free trade with CHina and not Cuba or North Korea since they are all alike ?

    1. Re:If they don't start a WAR with Taiwan. Maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. They have money. Do you think governments or big business care about what they deal with as long as it has money.

    2. Re:If they don't start a WAR with Taiwan. Maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow are you uninformed. While China isn't the model for what a government should be, it has been consistantly moving closer to capitalism. And you are a moron if you think the large companies give a flying fuck what kind of society their money goes to as long as it is cheaper.

    3. Re:If they don't start a WAR with Taiwan. Maybe. by KoalaBear33 · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should look at what USA is first... USA has done exactly the same thing for years. Look at all the US experiments (sick :( ) in South America...

      KoalaBear33

      --
      ......The worst thing in my life happened when the stock market started mattering more than the economy
    4. Re:If they don't start a WAR with Taiwan. Maybe. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Wow, fool. What a troll.

      Capitalism is not democracy.
      Democracy is not capitalism.

      In a similar respect, an expansionist regime is not democracy, either.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  52. Re:"In line with the Chinese government's IT polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "China has a somewhat different IT policy to many Western nations."

    Yes, China don't build a worldwide system to spy on their and foreign citizens (Echelon).

  53. MODERATORS. MOD PARENT BACK UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There's nothing trolling or inflammatory about the parent article. The writer backs up what she says with links to reputable articles.

    I just don't get it. We can criticize American nationals for what they do. We can critize just about any Western national for what she does.

    But heaven help us if you say anything negative about Chinese nationals.

  54. I think there's some mistake... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    inetnum: 213.45.12.0 - 213.45.15.255
    netname: TIN
    descr: Telecom Italia S.p.A
    descr: E@sy.ip ADSL service OSPF Area 01
    descr: Wholesale service for ISP
    country: IT

    I think you were looking for CHINA. You're in the wrong part of the world, I'm afraid.

  55. Of course chinese workers aren't paid the same by Syncdata · · Score: 1

    How much did you pay for your last pair of Jeans?(television, ram chip, etc.)
    Think of the entire world as one big company. In the current climate, you have China, Mexico, Indonesia, etc. This is the manufacturing department. The specs are transmitted from the Research and Development department (the United States/Industrialized world) The average worker in R&D gets paid much more than those in china, this is true. This is because they are doing the things that haven't been done before. They are more educated, and thus, demand a higher salary, as they bring more than a set of hands and eyeballs to the job. (let alone issues like a high minimum wage). It would be stupid to have the R&D department also fabricate, manufacture and ship their new widget. Instead, R&D works on the more cost-effective task of creating the next revision of the widget, or a new widget altogether, while others do the heavy lifting.
    Economics, like politics, is harsh. Noone likes to see those jobs leak overseas, or to watch a foreign country copycat what's already been done. But the alternative is paying 2000 dollars for a P3, strictly because it was manufactured in the R&D department. Tell me, if that was the situation, how much fewer would be the number of computers in use in the US? And following that, how many fewer jobs would be available for educated people to service, and maintain those computers stateside?

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Of course chinese workers aren't paid the same by sniggly · · Score: 1

      R&D is being exported to the orient as well, both China and India have highly qualified people that are employable for a fraction of the cost (and competitive at the frontier of their expertise). And they are employed in R&D by western companies. The "job" that remains in the west is shareholder, investor, and in services (like cleaner of toilets). Unless wages here go down.

      --
      Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
    2. Re:Of course chinese workers aren't paid the same by Surt · · Score: 1

      My last pair of jeans cost a lot more than they did before free trade. Nearly twice, for the same brand and style actually. Way outpacing inflation.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Of course chinese workers aren't paid the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll notice that even while car companies are moving to foreign soil, their prices don't seem to be changing all that much. PROFIT!

  56. Maybe we need slower, cheaper alternatives... by globalar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There seems a constant rush to dump current consumer chips and move on to something faster (like Moore's Law needs to be held up). This does not represent the needs of mass consumers - it represents the interests of corporations who want cash to keep winding the cycle upwards for greater and continued profit.

    There is nothing wrong with a chip that does not compete with the latest specs. So many people believe that they need stellar specs - they need reliable, cost-effective chips that do their math.

  57. *heh* good move by Teunis · · Score: 1
    More freedom for US equals good.
    It's a nice looking chip for embedded work from the details of it.

    but the freedom thing is good for everyone (particularily outside the US) as the US is threating all kinds of nasty protectionist tactics. Hard to trust these days.
    No I'm not in the US.

  58. Any OC potential? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how good does that badboy overclock?

  59. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by sniggly · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think you'll have to look at something like a 400mhz celeron or pentium 2 for comparison. Price hence will be very very low. Midori is an excellent distribution, less demanding even than redhat 6.2 so if you run icewm on it you'll have a very good speed.

    People don't need much, we use office / openoffice because everyone else does. In China they can do their own thing with less bloated simple tools. Like a spruced up xedit. Such a system wont need more than a 10gb harddisk if even that.

    Will be interesting to see what they pick as a browser and email client.

    Ballpark guess at cost would be between $125 and $175 (w/o monitor). Depending on memory, drives, multimedia, etc.

    --
    Of those to whom much is given, much is required.
  60. VD in China by Frogbert · · Score: 0

    It's been well known for years that you can easily get V-D in China, but untill now its never been a good thing.

  61. Assembler by ljavelin · · Score: 1

    This processor will most certainly weed out all those CS majors that thought that assembler was as easy as apple pie ;-)

  62. Mod Parent Up by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Excellent post!

  63. Digital Rights Management? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonder if Intel and AMD are so keen to build DRM into their processors now?

  64. Obsessed? by Zazi · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who thinks that the Chineese are obsessed with red, fire, Dragons, and Gold stars? I mean c'mon! They limit their names to basically those four themes! WHERE'S THE CREATIVITY?! Here in the states, we have a variety of names such as Itanium, Winblows, Linux, and Yodigidy (ok, fine... that last one was to prove a point), but hey! WHERE IS THE CREATIVITY AND VARIETY, CHINA?!

  65. You're missing the point. by RatBastard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You are completely missing the point. The Chinese are not trying to make an Intell/AMD Killer. They are making a CPU with enough horsepower to run Linux and let people do office tasks - email, word processing, spreadsheets, etc... and other normal computing tasks. They are also making a CPU in-house, which means they don't need to worry about how Intel or AMD feels about them or even if the US government doesn't want them buying powerful chips.

    This isan't about playing DOOM3 or Half-Life2. This is about China having an IT sector that is not subject to the whims of non-Chinese companies or governments.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:You're missing the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right on! I use a PII 266 with 128 MB RAM, use Woody, Gnome/IceWM, Gnumeric, Abiword, cruise the net with Firebird, and open the .pps files my daughter sends me with OOo, what am I missing????

      Five years from now, the Chinese will be improving and they will be selling chips and computers to the Third World, and who is going to stop them?

    2. Re:You're missing the point. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      They are also making a CPU in-house, which means they don't need to worry about how Intel or AMD feels about them or even if the US government doesn't want them buying powerful chips.

      Good point. A few years ago when the G4 was released, US government wouldn't allow the new Macs to be exported. Reason: With it's new 128 bit Velocity engine, the Mac was considered a "super computer" by the government's archaic definitions. It could not exported without explicit consent for each customer. Although the government revised it's definitions, it could impose restrictions in the future so China needs it's own processors.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    3. Re:You're missing the point. by 10am-bedtime · · Score: 1

      to maintain, one must first lead.
      to lead, one must first do.
      to do, one must first try.
      to try, one must first accept failure.
      to accept failure, one must first open the mind.

      when the mind is open, failure is a curiosity.
      when failure is a curiosity, trials are evenly weighed.
      when trials are evenly weighed, momentum is balanced.
      when momentum is balanced, directionality emerges.
      when directionality emerges, your job has just begun.

  66. Character generator? by pesc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I am interested in CPU architecture, I tried to find some technical info on the chip. I didn't found much, except a large powerpoint file which I failed to download. Slashdot effect? I wonder if they can read/produce such .ppt files under their Midori Linux ;-)

    However, there is much more talk about their embedded character generator! This sounded very funny to me. A character generator in a CPU??!?!

    After browsing around, I found that the vice president of Culturecom has been working 20 years with chinese character encodings. I guess the board of directors has a lot to say about what the chip real estate should be used for ;-)

    I also found this link explaining somewhat more. (Is it normal practice for UCLA to comment on market opportunities for Chinese companies in scientific papers?)

    Anyway, Culturecom seems to have invented an encoding for chinese characters that encodes brush strokes. This seems to be a good idea, and is likely superior to the outline encoding used in TrueType. It is probably a nice algorithm. But they don't seem to want to publish this algorithm. The idea is to "embed" it in a chip, and sell the chips instead. ($25) Maybe this makes sense in china where patents and copyrights are routinely violated, but I personally think that the chip real estate could probably have a better use.

    Speaking of copyright violations; their web site says that they are selling Midori Linux for only $50. I wonder if that includes source code and a GPL license?

    --

    )9TSS
  67. Arghhh.... Why aren't people getting it? by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    Hi, palladium was always supposed to be able to be disabled on every machine. When disabled you can't use anything that requires palladium like a broadband movie download site or whatever the applications are in the future.

    Your not getting anything but a slower chip with the dragon as you will still not be able to access palladium required content.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
    1. Re:Arghhh.... Why aren't people getting it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I refuse to use palladium required content you insensitive clod!

    2. Re:Arghhh.... Why aren't people getting it? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Your not getting anything but a slower chip with the dragon as you will still not be able to access palladium required content.

      I don't want Palladium required content, and I am in fact willing to pay slightly more for a slightly slower machine to avoid giving money to anyone who promotes TCPA or Palladium or any similar crippled/restrictive technology.

      The current dragon chip is slower than my current machine so there'd be no point in me buying one. BUT - it will be some time before TCPA / Palladium hit the market, and some time further before they become the only thing available. And if I buy one of the last available non-TCPA/Palladium machines (therefore fastest available), it will be two or three more years before I want to replace it. By that time I'm sure China will have made signifigant progress.

      If all US companies insist on making/selling nothing but crippled products then I will GLADLY send all my money and all my business to China.

      I am willing to vote with my dollars.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Arghhh.... Why aren't people getting it? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      That's what they're saying..now. But there has been a long history of "minor improvements" that eventually lead people to places that they wouldn't have wanted to go.

      Best to try to snip palladium in the bud. If not, to avoid it. It provides no evident advantages to the end user at all. And it will be a continuing threat after it's created. Sort of like bio-engineering a new strain of leprosy that only becomes active if it encounters something illegal...say pot or lsd, yes? Who could object to that? And if it mutates?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:Arghhh.... Why aren't people getting it? by Nazmun · · Score: 1

      It provides movie and music makers with more of an incentive to provide their content to pc users directly. That is a benefit for us... Movie makers know that unlike old tape bootleg movies (with loss in every single recording session), remaking perfect digital copies from a digital copy and redistributing with the net is far too easy. That is why they are hesitant.

      I am not supporting palladium or current copyright law but there are benefits to the end user. I think what we really have a problem with is the law and nothing else...

      --
      Hmmm... Pie...
  68. Poor little website. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    Was it always this slow, or only after this article was posted?

    What I want to know is, when will a development board be available, and will it be affordable? Large corporations like intel can sell their development boards for one to two thousand dollars (US) are a matter of course; even transmeta's is a grand. Embedded boards typically are cheaper, running in the US$100-500 range. (For instance, lots of motorola 68k dev kits were $100, then later $250. Coldfire seems to run about $500.)

    It would be logical to assume that if they are going to be appealing to the low cost embedded market, tht they will make the dev board be cheap, but that doesn't mean they will. Anyone have any information on a development system? There is a picture of the system and a few specifications (nontrivial to make a direct link to) which include a four port USB 1.1 controller, 10/100 ethernet, eight analog inputs, two 16550+ compatible UARTs... They say it has a character generator, but no other word on the graphics capabilities. It appears to have 66MHz 32 bit PCI, that's kind of keen I guess.

    So, how much is the damn thing going to cost in the US?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  69. let see by Dumbush · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I changes the wording a bit here, would it still make sense?

    the flagrant abuses of some South American countries that US has perpetrated since the 1950s are inexcusable. The fact that US is even allowed NEAR the United Nations is a gross mockery of justice.

    I know I'm evangelizing here, but people need to know that the wealthiset nation in the world is consider by many as more brutal and inhuman than Saddam Hussein's.

  70. Man-Hwa chip!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Otaku no Microprocessor, neh?

  71. free samples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what I want to know is where can I get free sample motherboards/chips...

  72. Sure, sure by roystgnr · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, if there's one country we can count on to resist pressure to place their population's property under a system enforcing centralized control, it's China!

  73. The problem with the Dragon chip is the gamers by DavidBrown · · Score: 1

    I'm serious. Most business users usually buy the most affordable hardware they can find that does what they need it to do. And they keep the hardware until it dies. The business trend in purchasing "bigger, faster, more" computers is the result of marketing, except for those business users who have a business need for bigger, faster, more. This may not be enough to drive technological improvement.

    But that's not all. The Chinese aren't any different from the rest of us. If they can afford it, they want to be able to play the latest first-person shooters and other games. Many people in the technological west spend more time on the Internet than they do watching television. Recreational uses of the Internet and computer gaming are becomming a very significant portion of the economy, take the second Laura Croft movie for example. The Chinese are going to want this, the say way that we want to play the latest Japanese PS2 games not yet ported into English.

    The problem with the Dragon is that it's a step away from the rest of the world. I certainly understand why the Chinese government is doing this - to help their own economy and to maintain control of their own population. But that won't stop the simple desire of Chinese home computer users to join the rest of the world playing Evercrack or any other game de jour.

    My prediction - the Dragon processer will be a successful business product in China, which is certainly not signficant. But it won't be more than that.

    --
    144l. ph34r my 133t l3g4l 5k1lz!
  74. be fair---why only China? by gacp · · Score: 1

    I could cite same reasons not to buy from, say, Intel or Dell. The US record on crimes against Humankind is very decidedly NOT GOOD. You could also say ``I'll only buy <insert-US-based-corp> only if the profit is used to torture `terrorists' in Camp-X (Guantanamo, US-occupied Cuba)''.

    And, in fact, since the US-led rape of Iraq, a lot of people around the planet are doing just that, boycotting US products.


    Oh, BTW: FREE IRAQ!

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
    1. Re:be fair---why only China? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      agreed. A good place for resident Americans to start, would be to stop drinking [most] coffee. More money is moved about by coffee, then by ANYTHING other then oil. It's impossible to know where one's gasoline is comming from, (with the exception of Texaco, which has a habit of raping the rain forest, and scatterring the indigenous South American tribes) so the next best thing is to boycott Starbucks, and all of those other great, multinational coffee corporations which make a habit of making ludicrous profit, at the expense of struggling third would nations. So, one should drink only fair trade coffee, from companies who only deal with fair trade coffee, because they need all the help they can get, when going up against multinationals, such as Starbucks. Another option is to give up coffee altogether for a cheaper, much healthier stimulant beverage. [hint: it's a green tea from Uruguay, Paraguay, and Argentina]

    2. Re:be fair---why only China? by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Give me a break, the US has imported a lot more than it's exported for years. You want to make a statement, stop selling to the US.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  75. MOD you up to GOD level status. by bobo333 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The Chinese nor other Asian nations believe in bilateral free trade. They put up walls on all Foreign-American products. If we made those Toys and textiles here in this country they might be more expensive but homemade product would be of better quality and flowing dollars to war like disruptive power would be stopped.

  76. going a tad off topic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where does this put the US when we pass tax cuts 80% for the rich in times of economic distress while sacking the middle class later (hey, the money has to come from somewhere sometime, poor people don't have enough, rich people can buy...I mean persuade politicans to their cause...) and doing little to raise the lower class standard of living? :P

  77. Telemarketers by bobo333 · · Score: 1

    more telemarketer jobs . There are no jobs left. Sorry if it sounds funny but it's true !

  78. Trade with Europe works . Not with Asian nations by bobo333 · · Score: 1
    its that simple. We should have dollar for dollar trade with the asians since they put up walls against free bilateral trade.

    Trade with Europe works.

  79. [M]architecture? by leandrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The title says it all. Any real info about what's the architecture (as in, is it x86, MIPS, SPARC, POWER, E2K?...), and how will it be marketed (clones vs proprietary, embedded vs general purpose, etc)?

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    1. Re:[M]architecture? by tqft · · Score: 1

      If you look at the earlier /. in the blurb up top I think you will find it is based on the public domain/open-sourced MIPS(?) architecture.

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    2. Re:[M]architecture? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > public domain/open-sourced MIPS

      Is it really free? AFAIK it's proprietary to SGI, never was top performance, and is being obsoleted at that. Perhaps there is some hidden wisdom to the choice, but hidden indeed at least from me. I could understand better an ARM, POWER or SPARC clone.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    3. Re:[M]architecture? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > the earlier /. in the blurb up

      Couldn't find it.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    4. Re:[M]architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a PowerPC. The diagram on their site gives that away as does the IBM involvement.

      Jon

    5. Re:[M]architecture? by tqft · · Score: 1

      I may have mislead you (lightly). All the stuff I see says "MIPS Like" - compatible but not close enough to provoke whoever.

      Try these.

      http://www.most.gov.cn/english/newletter/q274.ht m

      http://pcc.spinet.gov.sg/uploads/eLinux/eLin2003 04 22/

      http://www.techimo.com/articles/index.pl?photo=1 6

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    6. Re:[M]architecture? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > All the stuff I see says "MIPS Like" [...] http://www.most.gov.cn/english/newletter/q274.htm

      Interestingly, the very first link says fully MIPS compatbile.

      I praise them from breaking free from CISC and avoiding the VLIW pitfall. But I'd like to see the reasoning behind not using one of the living architectures, like ARM, POWER or SPARC. AFAIK MIPS is dead for general-purpose computing and will live on embedded only, like the PowerPC.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  80. You miss the BIG point. China doesn't want U.S... by bobo333 · · Score: 1
    products bought in their country. Do you people really believe the Chinese believe in something as stupid as FREE TRADE ? The Chinese manipulate their markets so that FEW if any U.s. products are bought.

    You people that buy into the benefits of free trade are so gullible. Do any of you wonder why there are so many telemarketer jobs and no manufacturing jobs in this country anymore ?

    The Chinese are one step ahead of the self absorbed academic intellectuals that think shifting jobs for dirt cheap labor is good for the U.S.

    How many of you would like to see all CAR manufacturing moved to China ? or Hollywood movie production or biotech ?

  81. Why bother with a CPU anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're planning to design stuff, why bother with an off the shelf CPU? Get into FPGA and customize your next project.

    Some of the FPGA board for customize your own project are starting to appear

    http://snaplogix.tripod.com

    1. Re:Why bother with a CPU anymore by waldo2020 · · Score: 1

      because you can't really make an FPGA go 150Mhz, or 2-3 Ghz, eh? do your homework..

  82. Re:"In line with the Chinese government's IT polic by Laur · · Score: 1

    Your 100% correct. They should stop building their PI-PII class microprocessors and stick to buying 10 Teraflop Supercomputers from the USA. That'll keep them from exercising their preffered IT policies!

    --
    When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
  83. China's Record Bad Enough - Re:Sure i'll buy one by SpikeSpiff · · Score: 2, Informative
    China's human rights record is spectacularly bad, on its own merits. Tibet is small potatoes.

    Tibet is pretty, and it has many movie stars. So people worry about Tibet.

    30 MILLION people died in China during the "great leap forward" and "cultural revolution" because of politically motivated starvation and executions. That's more than the population of Tibet. In fact, it ranks as one of the great tradgedies of human history, with the black plague, AIDs, WWI, and WWII.

    Tiannenmen. And friends like North Korea, Cambodia, and Vietnam.

    --
    "All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke
  84. Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The author of the above post makes some well-reasoned points. Those modding him down are not doing so because his post is a troll, but rather because they have agendas of their own. Unfortunately they chose the coward's method of combating an idea, rather than the method of tackling it head on with well-reasoned posts of their own.

    Frankly, as for the author's points, China is a totalitarian, aggresive, expansionist, military power. Technology leakage to China through Taiwan is a very real problem for the US and its allies. It's not a racist thing. It's realism. We don't, for example, worry so much about technology in the hands of the peaceful democratic country of South Korea.

    1. Re:Mod parent back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China is a totalitarian, aggresive, expansionist, military power.

      WTF? CHINA is an aggresive (sic) expansionist military power? WTF? Are you on fucking crack? Or do you not understand what the word hypocrite means? The United States has military bases in Antarctica, Antigua and Barbuda, Austrailia, the Bahamas, Bahrain, Belgium, British Indian Ocean Territories, Canada, Columbia, Cuba, Denmark, Egypt, France (yes, France), Germany, Germany, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Honduras, Hong Kong, Iceland, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Kwajalein Atoll, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Peru, Portgual, Saint Helena, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, the United Kingdom and Venezuela. But yeah, China is an aggresive (sic) expansionist military power. What the fuck ever. Get your head out of your ass, fucktard.

      "I wonder why those dumb ass Chinese spend so much on defense. Must be plotting to take over the world or sumfin. I'm gonna get me another Coors Light and watch me some Fox News."

      You fucking moron.

      We don't, for example, worry so much about technology in the hands of the peaceful democratic country of South Korea.

      The peaceful democratic country with 100 (count them, I would have listed them too if I wasn't so damn lazy) US military bases and 37,000 US soldiers. Gee, I wonder why we don't worry as much about technology there. It's a mystery. Please enlighten me Mr. Internet Genius Geek Boy.

    2. Re:Mod parent back up by andrewski · · Score: 1

      Technology leakage to China through Taiwan is a very real problem for the US and its allies.

      We could produce the chips and associated tech we need so badly over here in America at home. The labor costs are higher in over here, though - average income in Taiwan ROC is just under $3000 per year. This would cut into profits, and, more importantly, corporate bonuses and treats for executives.

      It's almost like the US Government WANTS to destroy the American manufacturing base. They certainly are permissive enough when it comes to it (NAFTA anybody?).

    3. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Look, I'm pretty much an isolationist. In fact, it's our military hegemony that makes China more of a threat to the US than to, say, Norway.

      But since you are an idiot, I'll say what you pretended I said the first time: "China is more expansionist than the US." It is. The character of China's wars are quite different from the US wars of the last several decades. The US hasn't had a frontier for a hundred years -- China however has numerous territorial designs. The US has enough territory. China doesn't. You are correct that the US has military bases around the globe. But they're just that, bases. They aren't there to oppress the local population. They aren't colonies. Hell, we even leave when the host nations tell us to (they don't because the bases bring them money and security).

      Now, if I were to say that "China is less peaceful than the US," I'd be wrong. But I didn't. Funny how that works.

      And the comma is correct. There is a difference between being an aggressive military power and an expansionist military power. I don't blame you for making an ass out of yourself with the 'sic.' Your having read into my post a million things that I didn't say gives me the impression that English is your second language anyway. Keep up the good work, it's a difficult language, but there are a lot of rewards.

    4. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I hear you. The open borders crowd owns Congress, however. The American people don't want the vast influx of immigrants who provide what is basically a slave labor force. They don't want to see jobs outsourced to India simply because Indians are so poor that they'll work for nearly nothing. Corporations do want this however, and they own Congress. Republicans are so used to fending off Democratic attacks on American business, that they don't realize that it's slightly different with a multi-national business. A rising tide lifts all boats, sure, but third world countries have a long way to be lifted. And Democrats are so into the hogwash of diversity and multi-culturalism, that they embrace an influx of third-worlders right across the boarder without a second thought. And that's despite the fact that it's primarily poor Americans whom it hurts -- Blacks have lost out to Hispanic labor in an especially big way.

      I'll recommend two websites:

      VDARE -- An immigration reform site
      The American Conservative -- Pat Buchanan's new magazine It's got some good pieces even if you don't agree with the politics. And it's saying some things no one else is.

    5. Re:Mod parent back up by GunFodder · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is factually incorrect. The US (unsuccessfully) invaded Cuba in 1961. Much more recently we invaded Afghanistan and Iraq. Every successful empire needs to expand in order to keep the plebians from revolting, and the US is no exception.

    6. Re:Mod parent back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Look, I'm pretty much an isolationist. In fact, it's our military hegemony that makes China more of a threat to the US than to, say, Norway.

      Actually no, you're wrong here too. The thing that makes China more of a threat to the US than Norway is the fact that China has the second largest military budget in the world (1999 numbers) and more importantly, is growing its GDP at 10% a year ( knocked down to 8% for a quarter or two due to SARS ) and its industrial production at 16% a year. And if Norway tried anything funny, well hell just check the list, we'd start landing our forces at our air force bases there....

      The character of China's wars are quite different from the US wars of the last several decades. The US hasn't had a frontier for a hundred years

      No it hasn't. And the reason is that due to its wars over the last 200 years it reached what scientists call an "ocean", preventing it from further expansion. It's very technical. As for China's wars, it has fought wars over the last few decades with the same countries it has fought wars with over the last few millennia. Wake me up when China invades someplace that HASN'T already been part of the Chinese empire at some point or the other.

      Hell, we even leave when the host nations tell us to

      Tell it to the Vietmanese, tard boy.

    7. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      Which of those three nations did we establish a colony in? Maybe you have a different defintion of expand than I do. China certainly does.

    8. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      To your first point: Norway is not in strategic competition with China, nor will it ever be. We are.

      To your second: I am aware that America stopped expanding for geographical reasons. That does not change the fact that the period of American expansion is over. Moreover, your point about Chinese empire is completely false. The simple act of being conquered by the Mongols does not give you the right to take over the entire Mongol empire. And do you feel that Japan has the right to take over China anytime it wants simply because it once made China part of its empire? That sort of reasoning is asinine. I do hear it often, however -- it's a product of indoctrination by the Chinese educational system. They're good at it. They are better than most anybody at fooling their own people with bold faced lies, I'd have to say.

      And as for your third point about the Vietnamese: We left despite the South Vietnamese asking us to stay. Which is why they were shortly thereafter overthrown by the communists. Do you remember the thing called the Vietnam war? Remember how we left at the end and abandoned the South Vietnamese? Perhaps you need some remedial history. You certainly need a lesson in civility. It would make you seem like less of an ass whenever you open your mouth and reveal your ignorance about history.

    9. Re:Mod parent back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you didn't notice, but Camp XRay is in fact, in Cuba. What colony?

    10. Re:Mod parent back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesen't matter. Still expansion is named. Anyway, nothig is made to last forever! :)

    11. Re:Mod parent back up by sheimers · · Score: 1

      > Frankly, as for the author's points, China
      > is a totalitarian, aggresive, expansionist,
      > military power.

      I'm really glad that China catches up. I really hate the USA being the only superpower in the world, seeing how they misbehaved in the international community lately.

      And I really hate comments like yours, pointing with your fingers at others, in stead of solving the problems in your own country first.

      And I am looking forward to buying a motherboard with a dragon CPU once they are available here in Switzerland.

    12. Re:Mod parent back up by weirdowe · · Score: 1
      Just one thing...

      Obviously this became a very patriotic and then somehow very personal topic. My request is don't call other people ignorant when you are just s much. That's called hypocrisy.

      "-- it's a product of indoctrination by the Chinese educational system. They're good at it. They are better than most anybody at fooling their own people with bold faced lies, I'd have to say."

      Maybe I'm just as ignorant, but to me it sounds like a giraffe accusing a lama of being too tall.

      my 2 cents ...

    13. Re:Mod parent back up by ChuyMatt · · Score: 1
      Well, we will have the UN trying to brow beat us if we ACTUALLY establish a colony. now, we are not a monarchy, are we. You are defining colony in that reference.

      What economic empires with armies attached do with colonies is, without establishing colonists, turn their "protectorate" or whatever into a source of income or as a power piece.

      China can do neither because we have them cornered on every market (except actual labor that may be their salvation and key into international business) and are not able to fulfill their expansionist dreams.

      so, in reality, tho separated by an ocean and very distinct cultures, our govt's goals are all the same. To become the leading superpower in the worlds greatest penis comparison.

      /rant

      oh.. and not everyone else is our enemy. A very unhealthy way to live. that goes for the US and the PRC!

    14. Re:Mod parent back up by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      I responded in kind to personal attacks. In fact, I was somewhat restrained.

      As far as my statement about Chinese education, I'm deadly serious. The US government attempts propaganda, certainly, and no one denies it. But the propaganda that a totalitarian regime is capable of is on a whole other level. From your statements, I think it's simply that you haven't had enough world experience to know what I'm talking about. Engage a Chinese citizen who has come abroad for an history education about what he thinks of Chinese official history. Or simply engage a Chinese national who has only had exposure to the Chinese offical version about the events of WWII. You will quickly be disabused of the idea that their version is somehow equally valid, I assure you.

    15. Re:Mod parent back up by MrEd · · Score: 1

      What is your UID. You are my new best friend on Slashdot.

      --

      Wah!

    16. Re:Mod parent back up by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      I assume that, in the interests of consistency, you personally solved all of Switzerland's problems before writing your post.

    17. Re:Mod parent back up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...Kwajalein Atoll, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Oman, Peru, Portgual, Saint... Don't forget Puerto Rico, 5 military bases on an island that's barely the size of Delaware, and Vieques a island half owned by the militiary with one of the highest mortality and cancer rates in the world for such a small island. Of course the ones dying are civilians. But if you ask the military forces they deny ever using anything remote noxious to the environment or humans! But if you dare to visit and walk the beaches you'll find UXO (Un-exploded ordinance) everywhere, and some casings most people have been unable to clasify. http://www.viequeslibre.org/
      >http://www.geocities.com/viequeswar/
      http://gbgm-umc.org/browse_search/results/search_s ite.cfm?keyword=vieques

    18. Re:Mod parent back up by lostinchicago · · Score: 1

      What the fuck ever. Get your head out of your ass, fucktard. that is awsome

  85. As the poster... by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have to say I made a boo-boo. The article in question actually tells that the processor is available for direct order, not pre-order as I had let on. Not like it stopped anyone who cared.

    (First submission! w00t!)

    1. Re:As the poster... by BlacKat · · Score: 1

      ..or Slashdot from actually checking thier stories. ;)

  86. Re:"In line with the Chinese government's IT polic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did this line send shivers down your spine?
    Also this line:

    "The chip will supposedly ship with Midori Linux"

    Midori Linux is probably a descendant of the operating system "Linux", an infamous communist OS.

  87. yeah!?! by geekoid · · Score: 1

    but what have they done lately? ;)

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  88. Inside scoop on architecture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take this with a grain of salt. I have inside info, but can't say too much.

    The chip has two iterations. The first one was fabbed and meant for eBook types of appliances. It is SOC (system on a chip) with Intel x86 core licensed from Fujitsu I believe as well as UARTS and an LCD controller. The custom character technology is very real, but has no OS support yet and would be a challenge to integrate into an OS.

    The second version is announced, but not produced as far as I know. It proposes to use a PowerRisc core and maintain similar character and IO capabilities.

    Bottom line is that the cores are licensed - this is not innovation or even local development. The key features are in the character generator - they are super efficient in encoding thousands of chinese characters to a rendering unit.

  89. Karma Chameleon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else at first glance read the homepage as cultureclub.com as in "Boy George and the Culture Club"?
    Total 80's flashback there for a second.
    Now I'm stuck with music in my head of a bad asian karaoke version of "Do You Really Want to Hurt Me?" Damn it.

  90. Hitachi Super H/H8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I don't count the NEC, Fujitsu and Sony stuff that is mentioned below because as you say, they were developed in the US and cloned or modified elsewhere.

    Hitachi H8/Super H (SH) is the most significant processor I can think of that didn't originate in the US. Many Japanese (and some Taiwanese, Chinese or Korean) companies prefer to use it because it is "homegrown". Thus it is used in many CD/DVD drives.

  91. distributed computing net for political monitoring by Doke · · Score: 1

    It's technically feasable for the government to insert distributed spyware in their version of linux. A system like this would be technologically capable of monitoring keystrokes for trigger keywords, and reporting them to the government. It could use idle time to examine local files, sniff the local net, or join a distributed computing cluster cracking dissidents' crypto.

    Since the government also controls the hardware, they can make it harder to replace the OS. They could make the processor only execute government signed kernels.

    I don't know if the current Chinese government would do these things. But I believe they have the technical ability to do them.

  92. Re:You miss the BIG point. China doesn't want U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What would you have the chinese buy, pringles? a big mac? Something they can afford?

  93. STONE HIM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BIG HEAVY ROCKS!

  94. Inquirer web site == Red Menace by doyoudig · · Score: 1

    my favorite article: China to become centre of everything

    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=1475

  95. Someone had to say it. by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

    "Don't look at me. We're talking about dragons. So you take Thom out to the set while I burn and verify these... the dragons."

  96. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by EinarH · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The last time this was up on slashdot someone mentioned performance equivalent to a Intel P2 450 MHz. Since this is a RISC CPU it will of course be stronger in diffrent areas but that is another discussion.

    But the real kicker with this CPU is the possibility for cheap dual and quad motherboards. If you can get 4 of these running under Linux or NetBSD the performance of one CPU don't mather that much. With a cost per CPU probably between $20-30* I would be all over tis offer.
    From a customers wiewpoint competition in the Quad-motherboard is appreciated as these MB's today cost insane amounts of money.

    All this depends on wheter they have added propper SMP support which is propably difficalt as they try to stay away of "IP" issues.

    *Wild guess of course, but they just can't cost above $30 if they expect them to sell in China.

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  97. Re:"In line with the Chinese government's IT polic by doyoudig · · Score: 1

    Only because China can't build their own -- not enough money and technical talent.

  98. Re:distributed computing net for political monitor by Snowdrake · · Score: 1

    Since the government also controls the hardware, they can make it harder to replace the OS. They could make the processor only execute government signed kernels.

    And one of the most time-honored traditions of modern hacker culture is that there's a way around every such system. No algorithm to prove your platform, etc.

  99. Good question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And if not... where do I sign to become Chinese?

  100. Further support by lpret · · Score: 1

    I recently just finished reading All the Shah's Men: An American Coup and the Roots of Middle East Terror by Stephen Kinzer and I must say it's been quite an eye-opener. Basically, the Brits lost their oil in Iran because a democratic leader realized that it was his own country's oil, not someone else. So GB had the US use the CIA to incite a coup and remove a democratically appointed, economically minded, leader to get their oil supply back. In his place, we put in a fundamentalist islamic leader who has become a model for other islamic groups (read: Taliban). That was the first of several "regime replacements" -- some might argue that the recent war against Iraq was not much more than this...

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  101. Hypocrisy: IT industy is soaking in it by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The self righteous crowd got let out of its cage today. Lets address some concerns:

    Humanitarianism:

    The computer you're typing youre typing on was most likely made in a place you would describe as a horrible sweatshop if you would ever get to see it. Same goes for all sorts of computer related goods.

    Lots of goods in general are clearly marked Made in China yet its this chip some people seem so focused on.

    Also, please take into account the US and its own allies record on human rights before entering the morally ambigious grounds of "Bad country vs. Good country."

    Propping up the industry

    All countries do this. Corporate welfare, sweetheart deals, tariffs, etc. Look in your own backyard before you accuse the neighbors of being a nuscience.

    "Its only a pentium II"

    Lets see the PII burns very little energy, had almost 10 million transistors and 64 gigabytes of addressable memory. Not a bad chip to be compared to. I used to run Mandrake on a PII-350 and it would play Divx movies without a frame skip. We're not talking a 8086 chip here.

    I'm not even going to go into how no one really needs a P4 at 2ghz to run Office and all the energy that wastes.

    "Tibet!"

    Whatever your thoughts on Tibet buying not not buying a Dragon chip will make no difference. Its like people refusing to drink French wine because of their position regarding Iraq. The French will not notice or care.

    Also, Tibet was a theocratic slave state with no concept of civil rights either. Pot meet Kettle.

    "China Bad, must punish."

    Maybe not. By entering into normal trade relations we make their economy dependent on the world economy, i.e. it becomes a political check, do bad things, watch your economy collapse through sanctions. I'm no lassieze-faire globalisation nutcase, but this certainly beats isolationism by a wide margin. Business doesnt exist in a vacuum, there have been cultural exchanges for quite some time and I would rather see a positive bend on westernism than trans-atlantic namecalling and useless boycotts.

    I'm an idealist too, but I know that I have bigger problems domestically and if I want to impose my view of the world onto other countries I'd rather be able to point to my backyard and say "this is how its done" as opposed to "you are bad, go away."

  102. Re:You miss the BIG point. China doesn't want U.S. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You ass. Pringles suck! No one eats that shit.

  103. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by andrewski · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For a country that is as backward as mainland China, possessing the ability to make a high-performance 32-bit pipelined microprocessor is a tad surprising.

    Hardly. You don't think that the Chinese know everything about the workings of CPU and RAM foundries in Taiwan? You realize that Taiwan is where much of our computer gear is manufactured.

    Whether you agree with the policies of the Chinese government, you must realize that China is one of the oldest civilizations in the whole world. America doesn't have exclusive rights to computing you know. Maybe they are tired of watching American companies flop around like beached salmon and want sustainable computing for themselves.

    Besides, the chip implements technology published as a standard. How could you call this stealing?

  104. Re:No biggy. U.S. Fab facilities will crush it by thisgooroo · · Score: 1

    it doesn't matter. as long as the US insists on deciding for political reasons what technology may be exported, any country that depends on technology will try to get in a position where they don't have to rely on US imports. with time they'll get enough experience that your prediction will be nothing but a fond reminiscence

  105. misinterpretation by boarder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, you misread his misspelling... he meant to say:

    "...which was killing millions of Americans through puberty"

    It's a hard stage in life, but regardly of Bush's policies we all have to pass through it. Some may not live to gain from it, but I believe puberty only makes us a stronger country.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  106. Interesting... by acidrain69 · · Score: 1

    While I do find the idea fascinating in your typical geek "it's not intel and it's not AMD" fashion, I find myself wary of anything coming from a country known for it's great Walls, both internet and physical. Not that I trust the US government, but I like to think the chinese government has more of a hand in things, and they may be putting stuff in their chips to exert control. Possible some special op code to turn off memory protection, on the simple end, or microcode to somehow allow control over the machine on the more expensive end. Thoughts?

    --
    -- Having a Creationist Museum is like having an Atheist place of worship
  107. Too much! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Also how much horsepower do you really think you need to for basic email, web, word processing and accounts use? "

    In China? Not much, since the web is heavily censored and controlled.

    History will record the abuses of the chinese and hold us (The United States) accountable because we didn't speak out so as to not offend a business partner.

  108. Price? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    I didn't read the story. So shoot me. Afterwards, anyone care to share the expected price for a CPU? What about the price of a motherboard?

  109. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can only hope that a new trend emerges in the microprocessor market: that the chips start to get faster and better with time.

  110. DragonFlyBSD for Dragon chip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a fortuitous name! It'd be fun to port DragonFlyBSD to the Chinese Dragon chip.

  111. I know but they do it better! by tjstork · · Score: 1


    Argh! Our own trade policy is very good at sinking the country even deeper into debt.

    Every time about how American workers can't compete, I have to ask myself how BMW manages to build the ultimate driving machine in that socialist realm of Germany, or how the supposedly stagnant French are able to launch satellites more reliably than Lockheed, and how on earth did Boeing lose its lead to Airbus!

    Really, it's not about the American worker, it's that American CEOs and middle managers are all idiots.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:I know but they do it better! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all quite simple. You see, the United States only appears to be ineffecient because of one simple fact. That fact is...

      Ohh, look, weapons of mass destruction! Do you see? Darn, you were too slow! Still, better luck next time.

      Now then, where was I? Oh yeah...I hope that answers your question. Thanks for asking!

    2. Re:I know but they do it better! by Sivaram_Velauthapill · · Score: 1

      Really, it's not about the American worker, it's that American CEOs and middle managers are all idiots.

      Actually they are not idiots at all. If anything, they are very smart (smarter than you j/k ;) ). I surprised that you fail to see that these people actually BENEFIT from all this. They aren't doing it just for the sake it. They are enriching themselves. You need to simply look at the wealth figures in USA. A segment of the population is increasing its wealth at a crazy rate. I hope you see who that is...

      --
      Sivaram Velauthapillai
      Seeking the meaning of life... @slashdot of all places ;)
  112. Re:Sure i'll buy one (Correction) by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

    Oops, er, before anyone else says WTF?

    In fact Nehru thought that India and China had a lot in common and was quite shocked when Mao took some strategic hills from India a few years after China conquered India.

    I meant, of course, after China conquered Tibet.

  113. You need to work on your reading comprehension by NicotineAtNight · · Score: 0

    The Americans didn't put Khomeini in place, he just volunteered for the position when a power void presented itself after Iranian students gave the boot to the American dictator.

  114. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the poster who pointed out midori = green could have been a skinny Japanese girl wearing a t-shirt with English phrases, but for some crazy reason you assume the complete opposite!

  115. and me without my mod points by sweatyboatman · · Score: 1

    it is the oldest trick in the book. and you know, it works like a charm every damn time. slight-of-hand. we're easily distracted animals.

    OOOH PRETTY COLORS

    wait, what was I talking about?

    --
    It breaks my pluginses, my precious!
  116. Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    assuming the parent is true (I don't know), this is worse than Hussein, cause that is more people than live in Iraq.

    Even if Hussein had wiped the entire country out, he could not have matched china.

    1. Re:Perspective by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Even if Hussein had wiped the entire country out, he could not have matched china.

      That's probably true. OTOH, on a percentage basis it's not even approximately as bad. If you are one of the individuals, it doesn't matter how good a country's record is, on the average. And even the US has instances. I shouldn't really say "even the US", as it's not that much better than an average (and you've got to include the third world countries to make that an accurate statement). But it's the one we know.

      OTOH, it's perhaps not surprising that Switzerland has a very low number of human rights violations.

      There seems to be a multiple dimensioned scale here where one axis is autocracy (as measured in the egomainia of the leaders, and their ability to enforce arbitrary decrees) and another axis is average wealth, and a third axis is the evenness of the distribution of the wealth.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  117. msmath.h by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    Or in the case of MS/Intel math screw it up!

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  118. GAAAA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People! Think a bit!

    It takes two to tango doesn't it?

    It also takes two to trade!!! (duh! you knew that!)

    can it be free trade if only one side is trading freely? no.

    Does the USA trade non-freely on some things? sure - everybody does.
    China trades unfairly on ALL things imports and exports.
    Because of their currency peg, they effectively give ALL EXPORTS (from china) a 20-50% advantage, and all imports a coresponding disadvantage. Most of the rest of Asia has the same policy (they kind of have too or china would kill them . . . )

    You wonder why jobs of all types are going overseas? this is the primary reason.

  119. babelfish by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Just for fun, I thought I would run their privacy policy through babelfish. It didn't work, but I did get a nice sampling of semi-random words.

    Here's an excerpt:
    the Shanghai little girl shakes chokes the stamp counter
    3. Tau infants spear piecE prize gallbladder snow sister-in-law Yao luxurious knee Wei A tau
    4. last of the ten Heavenly Stems Tau infants the spear embarrassed Tau Fujian Province spear piece ya offers a sacrifice to peacefully repeatedly makes Egypt

  120. Re:"In line with the Chinese government's IT polic by ratfynk · · Score: 1

    But the Fritz chip that Intel is about to unleash with MS doesn't? The US is one small step away from an information monopoly, you guys just won't admit it. Yes China is bad however what is happening to Americans is just as bad. The RIAA will be at door soon, then it will be Microsofts turn! MS is delighted that the Chinese now will not be pirating Office. However if we keep being so stupid about our High Tech sector they may just eat our lunch the same way MS ate IBMs.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  121. Technical, non political post #1 by andrewski · · Score: 0

    Looking at the specs of this chip for the moment, and not the politics of east asia, this little board looks pretty sweet.

    First of all the processor - isn't it kinda like a SPARC? I'm pretty sure it is. I guess we'll see.

    Secondly, the board looks cool too. Eight analog inputs, built-in character generation (!) of 32,000 chinese characters, extensible to 50,000 +, and built-in 10/100 ethernet.

  122. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by den_erpel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You raise some valid points, but you need to come off your high horse. Back in the time when the USA was, what you call, a backward country, the US was all so pleased to get Fermi, Einstein fleeing totalitarian regimes in Europe (to name just a few). They did not come to their theories and research in isolation, but were a product of their environment and education in those countries. But they started or helped a developing industry and research in the US.

    Later, the US even incited top leading researchers to go to the States, well in many cases, they had little choice, but it was better than being deported by the USSR.

    In short, this has happened before (and was done by those that had little to protect or complain about, but are now the first to be scorned), and is happening again. Nothing new here, move along.

    In times of world Economy, I am still dazzled to see that ppl seem to find reasons to protect their little countries (in fact, the country they are in can do anything they want, but everyone else should be good, unfair competition anyone?). I am just glad to see another alternative processor and in the long term, it can only benefit us with lower prices and better performance.

    --
    Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  123. Communist processors... by Basje · · Score: 1

    Remember: this is a communist processor. As a result all the Dragon processors in the world can only run as fast as the slowest processor.

    *rimshot*

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
  124. In other news by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    The Swedish furniture giant IKEA has decided to release its own home computer. To begin with, it will only be for sale in the German market. Read more here.

  125. Actually they did buy MiGs by pmfp · · Score: 1

    They did buy MiGs from Russia, worth $3.5 billion (hey, why not, the people is just starving, but if they voice their opinion or don't follow the policy set by the government entire villages are, in fact, wiped out). They pulled in another contract at approx. $3 billion earlier, but the contents of it escapes my memory. Anyway, these Su-27 fighters' secret fire control and system integration were duplicated by Zhu Rong Gong, officially admitted in June 2002. This enables them to make their own modern fighter jets. Taiwan is under a direct threat, and so is everybody within reach of China. That is simply how it is. China is much worse than you'd expect.

    --

    "So unmerciful is life, that everything afterwards is too late."
    1. Re:Actually they did buy MiGs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you also advocate your own government redirecting military spending to social programs? The United States could have the best Socialised Healthcare system in the entire world if it spent a fraction of its defense budget on it instead of bombs. It isn't just China who do it.

  126. I have seen the inside specs of the math processor by ratfynk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    All I could make out was a bunch of guys in funny hats running up and down lines of bars moving what looked like round wooden balls. Looked funny as the groups of balls then were counted by an old man in a RedHat, who sent the results to output, after he checked the results against the government blocking code base.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  127. What a load of crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, over there --it's a pinko!
    My Dear Lord. Well, I understand, I have a paranoid schizophrenic aunt. I'm not against you people. Nobody is. That's the whole point. It's all in your head. Really, just try to relax. Nobody is going to hurt you as long as you don't get violent. But please refrain from making a food of yourself in public.

    1. Re:What a load of crap. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because I forgot my bib, and eating your spleen while waiting for the bus would be too messy.

      Anyone for finger sandwiches?

  128. Are you sure they're not running Midori in RAMDisk by ahfoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I got the impression that the whole distro is loaded into RAMDisk from a flash.
    This really caught my eye because just recently on the Knoppix boards, a script has come out to load a whole Knoppix distro directly into RAMDisk.
    I bet this is how it works and I think it's an awesome way to go. I want to try and load Morphix into 300 Megs of RAM using the script over at Knoppix. You could try it too! They say it's freakin' fast once you load everything into RAM.
    I think it's interesting that the other popular desktops, MS and Apple, really don't have any incentive to go this way since it could potentially stall high end hardware sales and that's not really in their business interests.
    After all, why do you need a bunch of hard drives if your OS is in RAM and you have cheap optical media for storage. And why do you need fast CPUs if your OS is already snappy as hell on an older --or newer, but slower, cheaper and less power hungry-- machines.
    I think this is huge news. I knew it was coming, but I thought it would be awhile. I think the immersion lithography deal made it pointless to put things off anymore. The tech transfer is complete and it had jack to do with Taiwan. The Taiwanese are far too greedy. This was home grown all the way. I have no doubt.

  129. Just use old chips by Nazmun · · Score: 1

    You can buy them for real cheap... will be more compatible with current software and will probably as fast as the dragon for years to come.

    --
    Hmmm... Pie...
  130. I'd like to recomend a book for you: by kikai+suki · · Score: 1

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1902 59357X/qid=1059555523/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/104-889851 7-1671955?v=glance&s=books

  131. Chinese bleeding edge fighter designs by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    As far as I know China has not bought a Mig fighter design since the Mig-17 the Migs 19 and 21 they reverse engineered from pattern aircraft provided sans drawings from the USSR shortly before the schism between the two countries in the 60's. They did however purchase the Su-27 and Su-30 after the fall of the USSR. China is years away from building anything like the Su 27 or the Su 30 from ground up. They can reverse engineer it and manufacture it themselves the way they did with the Mig-21 (J/F-7) but they are incapable of actually designing a modern fighter 100% on their own from the ground up. Even the J-10 fighter which is so highly hyped up the US-senate's military budget debates (although it is usually labelled as complete junk by the USAF outside those gatherings) is probably based Israeli Lavi fighter programme which was sold to China by the Israelis to piss of the US when the US refused to fund it with even more millions of US tax dollars than they had already poured into it by then. Of course the Chinese will eventually become able to design their own, 100% Chinese built and designed, combat aircraft that can hope to compete with US/EU/Russian Bleeding edge fighters but the timeframe is probably on the order of 20-30 years or so.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Chinese bleeding edge fighter designs by pmfp · · Score: 1

      You're mostly correct. I mixed up MiG and the Su series. Either way, Chinese is bad. An interesting point, however, is that they don't have a rush to build their 100% own aircraft. They can buy tons of armaments from other dealers, mainly Russia, and can if they so wish reverse engineer it. I think 20-30 is somewhat too long, but I don't want to bet on it.

      http://www.debka.com/article.php?aid=84

      --

      "So unmerciful is life, that everything afterwards is too late."
  132. Just had to troll! =) by shaggie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. The simple act of being kicked out of Europe does not give you the right to take over the New World from the Natives.. BUT YOU DID!! and forced them into reservations for their own protection... =) (I'm not saying that is wrong either.. its a basic law of science by some dude they call darwin.. survival of the fittest or some crud)

    2. If you go back 5000 years, what is now known as China was actually many separate kingdoms, bout 8 or 9 and yes today's Tibet belonged to one of those kingdoms and the land of Tibet over the last 5000 years have been off and on, in and out of "China's" control. Some uprising here and there changes possession of control throughout the years. Look at the greeks, romans, normans, franks, etc.. they all did the same shit, so why is it that when China does it, China is the evil empire and when the europeans does it, its A-OK.

    China's autocratic regime does have its drawbacks, but then again it does have its usefulness. Many critics of the system based their assessment on the assumptions of their own environment and did not take into account the cultural, economical, educational differences.

    There are some ideas which we deem extremely previous which runs counters against other cultures and we think people who do not adopt what we deem precious is EVIL...(pinky to the lips!). Democracy is a system that can only work when education, cultural, and economic standards are of a level that can sustain a democratic system. Every other country that has tried to implement a democractic system that has not achieve a certain threshold in these categories have failed miserably. Taiwan, Russia, Japan, Indonesia, etc.. list goes on and on.

    3. The US government isn't good at fooling their own people with bold faced lies? Please google Bushism, it provides a good read to counter your arguments =). Not to mention that we are known for buying political, military and economical favors with our "AID" packages. recent examples.. turkey, pakistan, et al. let us use your land as base for our iraq campaign and we promise give you X billion (in fine print but we will have to get congressional approval in addition to the presidential promise, so the AID package MIGHT not be there). So we just package our lies a little better but what's the difference?

    4. Regarding vietnam, my understanding was due to political and social reasons, the government never commited enough military support to make the war winnable, all the hippie protests (really just an excuse to say FUCK over a PA system a lot, get alot of people in one place to have free casual sex and complain at the government imo), the morale issue of the soldiers there where it seems that most of them don't know why the fuck are they doing in the jungles of vietnam. The US finally left because it became too economically, and politically unsustainable for them to continue in vietnam. Thus vietnam became the only war in modern history that the US technically lost, now if the US actually focused the entire might of its military powers in vietnam, there won't be tributes to uncle ho in vietnam right now. There'll be an american flag there instead.

    5. Based on what I have read of ancient and modern historical text (last 4500 years) Other than wars within the area in what is known as China today, the "Chinese" has never actually invaded another country. (Parts of North Korea was actually part of China off and on over history). The japanese and korean kingdoms also deferred to the decisions of the chinese emperors and used the chinese emperors as leverage politically in their own kingdoms. You can find references to that in many of the historical accounts.

    China has also never engaged in colonialism even though they had more than enough power militarily to do so in the past. In the Ming dynasty, a fleet that contained over 100 ships set sail under the command of Admiral Cheng Ho. He visited many places and iirc went all the way to Africa. Whenever he arrived at a new place, instead of setting up colonies, he did a PR camp

    1. Re:Just had to troll! =) by chenGOD · · Score: 1

      "Parts of North Korea was actually part of China off and on over history"

      You could also say that parts of China were actually part of Korea (well technically Kokuryo), on and off.

      But interesting post.

    2. Re:Just had to troll! =) by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Good post. I think you misread some statements of fact for value judgements in my above posts. In fact, I agree with most everything you say. I'd have to add that leadership problems contributed enormously to the problems in Vietnam. They tried to fight Vietnam like WWII, which it wasn't. I agree that it was winnable. Also, our knowledge voyages of Cheng Ho is limited. He is quite often exaggerated for multicultural propaganda purposes. For evidenciary reasons, I am quite skeptical about the actual extent of his voyages and the often claimed dimensions of his ships. I agree with you that China is totalitarian for a number of reasons, and attempted democratic transformation could have disasterous effects. Just look at Russia and much of Africa for examples. On the other hand, I consider the state of China's regime somewhat precarious, and feel that upheaval is possible for the future. The current communist leaders are in fact very much at odds with China's history, in my opinion. Given the economic development going on, I imagine that things may in fact turn out better if change comes.

      No of this changes my opinion that regional conflict involving both the United States and China is possible for the reasons of China's expansionism and the United State's regional interests in the region. Again, I'll state my preference for isolationism; I feel that we have no compeling military interest in the region. Yet, knowing my countrymen, I'm sure that my opinion will not win out, making China's expansionism worrying to me.

    3. Re:Just had to troll! =) by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      "China has also never engaged in colonialism even though they had more than enough power militarily to do so in the past."

      "China may not be powerful enough to take on the US today but they have more than sufficient might and resources to invade many other countries or to participate in multilateral military operations, but to date they have not done so."

      Hello? Tibet?

      Your justification of Chinese aggression and colonialism in Tibet by reference to Roman (!) and Greek (!) aggression 2,000 years ago is frankly surreal.

    4. Re:Just had to troll! =) by shaggie · · Score: 1

      Annexing != Colonizing

      Plus my justification is really that Tibet was/is/has been part of Imperial China over history, nothing wrong with them wanting it back again.

      Not exactly knowledgeble about the situation in the UK but from the surface knowledge that I have, I could very well say that England is agressive and has taken over Wales, Ireland, Scotland, et al! Same shit, different times, different international crowd to deal with but still the same shit.

      I wonder what would the US do if Hawaii suddenly decided to declare independance, break away. After a hypothetical 50 or so years of being the country of Hawaii, and the US suddenly invades and takes back Hawaii. Would this hypothetical situation be any different from what China did to Tibet. Lots of native pacific islanders in Hawaii too!

    5. Re:Just had to troll! =) by shaggie · · Score: 1

      let's see..

      isolationism is good for large countries with huge industrial potential, I would say.. Given that isolationism was one of the key ingredients that led to the US being the power that it is today. But then prolonged isolationism would've been disasterous for the US especially if it had to deal with a Europe under Hitler and Asia under Japan. Isolationism kept long enough and then come out at the most opportune time and kick major ass would be, I think, a better way. Hey, its proven by history twice over to work!

      US and China are both headed for a showdown, I don't think anyone is going to argue about that. Any government is all about self-preservation and any good government will by any means neccessary do just that. US gov is especially adept at that due to the leverage they have globally. The US gov both civilian and military has caused huge havoc all over the world but most of the time the results are either direct or indirect benefits to the people of the US. Depending on which end of the stick you are, you are gonna have different feelings towards it. (well maybe not the politically correct hypocrites, bash the very government that will ensure the majority of US citizens will have a better quality of life than most other countries, sure sometimes their methods are unethical but who cares, not like other govs never did that)

      "containing" China is in the best interest of the US since it will prolong the time to the inevitable confrontation, not to mention economical benefits between now and then.

      The US's regional interest in asia is just the same as in the middle east. There's lots of yet unexploited resources in asia ripe for the picking. Ultimately I think everything really boils down to how much economical benefits i'll reap rather than how morally righteous I am.

      I think the trend by the Chinese old guards is to slowly phase out their system of government. Given what I know of Chinese culture, the changes will be very gradual (too slow for the media, militant human rights activists, et al), since the norm is not to let your elders "lose face", so all the changes will probably come when the middle class is firmly established as the economic might of the country and all the old guards have died off. My feeling is that they are letting change come to them instead of effecting the changes with total disregard.

      I sure hope I don't live to see the day that China and US become openly hostile towards each other. That would be bad and I think Einstein might get his prediction right, the 4th World War will be fought with sticks and stones, if we do see the day the 2 powers actually clash. Let's just hope it stays purely a battle of economics.

    6. Re:Just had to troll! =) by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 1

      Providing financial incentives for hundreds of thousands of native Chinese to move to Tibet = colonising.

      And, speaking as a Scotsman, your analogy with the UK is daft. If we ever vote for independence we will get independence. We have as much self-determination as we want. Tibet has none.

      In your Hawaii example, I'd hope and expect the US would allow it do break away. If it didn't then the US would be indeed be on the moral slippery slope to Tibet.

    7. Re:Just had to troll! =) by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      1. The simple act of being kicked out of Europe does not give you the right to take over the New World from the Natives.. BUT YOU DID!! and forced them into reservations for their own protection... =) (I'm not saying that is wrong either.. its a basic law of science by some dude they call darwin.. survival of the fittest or some crud)

      Please don't use evolution to justify social injustices, it just gives evolution a bad name.

    8. Re:Just had to troll! =) by shaggie · · Score: 1

      but but but but but i thought it already had a bad name....

      Down with social injustice seems to be the typical chant from well-fed, well-dressed, well-educated developed nations folks.

      oh wait... that would be me as well... ahhh hell....

    9. Re:Just had to troll! =) by shaggie · · Score: 1

      I doubt many of the Chinese immigrants went willingly. Maybe the beareaucrats did, doubt the other folks did. At the height of the British empire, there were no indications of mass migration to the colonies even though it meant many brits could've lived like a king in the colonies with tons of servants to cater to their every whim. Majority stayed at home (australia's a different matter =P)

      It more like Assimilation not Colonization. Colonization = control the resources, exploit it, ship it back to homeland.

      Colonization failed when the natives and immigrants finally had it with having to ship their stuff back to homeland and took up arms to declare independence. Happened all over the world. Hell the US was formed like that.

      Frankly I doubt your statement that if Scotland actually voted for independence that the folks in London would actually allow it to happen. Have not seen a government anywhere in the world that would allow a part of their country to secede away without going through a violent period. Invasion, Independence wars, etc.

  133. uname -a by horcy · · Score: 1

    Midori-1.0.0-beta3 test.test.com 2.4 #10 SMP Sun Feb 24 15:58:36 CET 2002 i386

    --
    Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
  134. China by hackus · · Score: 2

    And so it begins...

    China has made a few things clear with respect to its rise as a new super power:

    1) We will show the world what can be done and take the lead as a nation in engineering, space exploration, and computer science.

    They started with the largest engineering project ever concieved..the largest hydro electric power project EVER.

    No western nation could duplicate such a project even if we wanted to because of the sheer size, and the use of cheap labor by the Chinese.

    China will have clean, cheap energy for 25% of the nations total needs for the next 100 years from this project.

    2) It has been rumored, recently in a M5 visit to China, that space exploration plans include a moon base within 15 years of thier first successful manned orbital launch.

    It was also made in not so many words, that once they complete this base, we are NOT welcome.

    3) China, doesn't want Western IT technology. Especially Windows, or Intel's chip technology in any sort of influence on its internal consumer markets.

    It was made clear that Intel's Chip ID technology and the CIA's insistence that back doors be placed into foreign copies of Windows, was not acceptable.

    It is forbidden in China to attach any Intel processor based system to the internet with Chip ID technology of anykind.

    This new processor was a "call your bluff".

    After all, HOW DARE YOU compete with Western technology, you can't possible build anything near as well as we can, so you must accept our processors if you want to do business with us.

    It is this direct response to Intel's Digital Rights, chip ID technology as well, that this processor now has been born.

    It won't take China long to ramp this processor up to Pentium 4 Xeon quality (3 years at most), using Tainwanese acquired fabrication planets and technologists.

    In my view, China can sustain its economic growth internally, due to its population size for the next 50 years, and tell the rest of the world to kiss its ass.

    I believe greed, our very own Intellectual Property Rights Laws, and this obsession with Digital Rights Management has locked us out of the only market that will provide long term economic security to the United States.

    What is more, I believe China is using these laws against our very own interests in doing business over there.

    Coupled with thier own version of RedFlag Linux, once China has its own PC, and own Operating System, THEY WILL DICTATE TERMS 50 years from now to the Western world.

    Our business leaders are fools in this country, and while China builds the biggest terrestrial project ever concieved, builds its own Moon Base 20 years from now, the world will do everything it can not to make the Dragon DISPLEASED.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:China by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Yah. And that giant hydro system will be a true disaster. Nearly every expert in the field agrees with that estimate (though they tend to disagree on exactly what kinds of disaster will ensue..several may be right).

      Three gorges dam alone may be a real disaster, but it won't be in the running when compared against their mega plan to shift water from the south to the north.

      For some reason politicians like to build huge construction projects. So if they can, they do. And they don't really count the costs (which probably won't be borne until after they are out of office).

      India has a similar, if smaller, plan in mind. This may be an act of aggression against Pakistan, but is probably not intentionally so. But that will be one of the results.

      China may well have relatively cheap electricty soon, but that will be a side effect of their burdgeoning semiconductor industry. (Cast-off chip blanks are reputed to be excellent for putting solar cells on. And there may be other approaches..but those are still speculative.) The dam will require a lot more maintenance than is projected, which will consume a lot of the electricity. And if they actually pump the water from the South to the North, that will consume another huge amount. And the dam will silt up quickly ... but presumably they've taken that into account?

      OTOH, the Hoover Dam has been of great value as well as causing huge problems. So perhaps the value of the dam will be enough to counter most of the damages that it causes. And ditto for the cross country canals. But there being huge values doesn't remove the fact that there will be huge damages. And we don't have any decent way to model the magnitude.

      I rather hope that China does push forward with their plans for a moon-base. I would expect it to be expensive, but if done properly (i.e., with a goal of long term survival rather than short term political advantage) that it could eventually pay for itself many times over. It could eventually be an insurance policy. (And we, of course, invited the Chinese along on our expeditions? Then why should they invite us?)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  135. Re:Trade with Europe works . Not with Asian nation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you're trading steel, and your own steel production industry is so crap you can't compete. Then its America First again.

  136. Excellent Points by tjstork · · Score: 1


    The problem I think is one of exchange rates.

    If US and Europe do not foster IP, then wages will collapse as all production will move to lowest bidding countries and eventually the world will wind up as corporate serfs.

    On the other hand, IP screws not only developing nations, it also undermines consumers and competitors at home. Wonder what the world would be like without IP? If Free Trade makes everything more productive, then, wouldn't free IP make everything more so?

    --
    This is my sig.
  137. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You forgot Von Braun :)

    Was he not politically correct enough for this discussion ?

  138. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by MegaHamsterX · · Score: 1

    I hadn't realized Microsoft and Intel were flopping around....Oh that's right this is slashdot............

  139. An earlier Dragon by henrygb · · Score: 1
    Many /.ers are blissfully unaware that they can buy $400 "boxen" thanks to Microsoft.

    The 1982 Dragon 32 was substantially cheaper than that. Though it did have MS Basic.

  140. These things are great! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Couple 20 of these things with a good Linux server and some flat LCD monitors and you can equip an office with super-fast terminals and a terminal server for less than the price of deploying one Windows 2003 server with 20 user licenses.

    I cant wait to buy a couple to play with...

    I just wonder what kind of inport restrictions the US govt is going to hammer on these things cince they upset tow of the largest Lobbiests...

    Microsoft and Intel will be mighty pissed about these things.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  141. That's the Future by wFruitbat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cool,

    Now they can have an opcode that will very quickly load the string "Long Live Chineese Socialist Party" in the video memory.

    http://www.google.com/search?q=free+chinese+lang ua ge+course

  142. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    But the real kicker with this CPU is the possibility for cheap dual and quad motherboards. If you can get 4 of these running under Linux or NetBSD the performance of one CPU don't mather that much.

    Actually, the problem with SMP is getting the memory bandwidth. If you have 4 processors ready to chew on data, but they can't get any data/program to run from the main system memory, it won't do any good. L1 and L2 caches help, but if they solved the problem, we wouldn't need the main system memory.

    There have been lots of good attempts to solve this problem -- message passing (ala a Beowulf running an MPI application), or some of the NUMA architectures are good at solving particular types of problems. But, none of these techniques will help you run OpenOffice or Quake faster.

  143. Not quite right by hey! · · Score: 1

    tibet was a province of china until 1911.

    According to whom?

    Imperial China's claims on Tibet stem from a curious incident when the barbarous pre-buddhist conversion Tibetans forced China to pay tribute. Part of the tribute was that the Tibetan king would get a Chinese imperial princess as a second wife.

    Subsequently, China claimed Tibet as a province, but never effectively had territorial control over Tibet. Tibetans have, until the twentieth century, essentially governed themselves. At times during the Ching dynasty, China has exercised hegemony over Tibet, but this followed nineteenth century theories of geopolitics. Tibet is resource and agriculturally poor, and therefore of no interest to anyone other than geopoliticians. This control never really reached the point of actual direct rule, and collapsed by the end of the nineteenth century.

    tibet was, in fact, an oligarchical theocracy before the invasion. over 90% of the population were "landless serfs" which basically means "plantation slave".

    Well, you're kind of putting an inaccurate modern spin on what was a pre-medieval society by western standards. Most tibetans were nomads, herding yaks and other cattle being the only form of agriculture that is viable on any scale there. They were "landless" in the sense that they lived in a vast commons. They were not serfs in that they did not belong to anyone; nor did they have much contact during their lives with the aristocracy.

    They did not have the modern institutions of democracy and private property; on the other hand most people's day to day lives were completely unencumbered by any form of government at all. So were they "not free" because they lacked these institutions in a society that did not need them?

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  144. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope, he in with the top leading researchers link

  145. Chinese Input Method by Daengbo · · Score: 1
    I'm not arguing with you, because
    1. you appear to know what you're talking about
    2. It's been about 15 years since I studied Mandarin seriously.
    I seem to remeber an input method from long ago based on bomopofo (remembering correctly?) Has that disappeared?
    1. Re:Chinese Input Method by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Damn it! That's supposed to be BoPoMoFo, not bomopofo.

    2. Re:Chinese Input Method by shaggie · · Score: 1

      That is ZU YIN IME or ZHU YIN depending on which romanization method you use to pronounce it. Its still around and IMO is the most accurate/fastest IME for Chinese, too bad China did away with it and went with PIN YIN although I have seen clerks using PIN YIN ime at incredible speeds. They can input Chinese faster than I can type in English and I type pretty damn fast in English.

  146. Re:Dragons /.'d Already by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    Such a system wont need more than a 10gb harddisk if even that.

    I just installed RedHat 9 on my wife's computer. (Gentoo on mine, don't give me crap) Obviously I didn't do an 'everything' install, but a simple 'workstation' install with KDE selected also came out to 2 gigs. That gives her 7-8 gigs of space to mess with for web/office/email type things. (10 gig drive)

    Only reason I said that is because 10 gigs is really enough for the casual computer user.

    As far as her downloading things (music files, etc), I have a fileserver with a raided disk array, so no need to worry about clientside disk space =) But that's only a worry if she starts downloading a buttload of ISO images or something.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  147. Re:1-800-759-0700 by lord_nightrose · · Score: 0

    Well, at least this is a semi-original troll... that's the number for the 700 Club...

    --
    This is not part of my post. It's my signature. I bet you're disappointed.
  148. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by Physics+Nobody · · Score: 1

    All I have to say to this is...go China!

    So China is trying to become more high tech. WTF is wrong with that? Do you want the earth's most populous nation to consist mostly of peasants forever? Your entire xenophobic post fails to explain why this is such a bad thing.

    --

    Physics is good

  149. China is a MAJOR human rights NIGHTMARE.. by Christ0ph · · Score: 1
    See http://www.laogai.org/ and http://iso.hrichina.org/iso/ if you don't believe the poster.

    Recent (now suppressed) *Chinese government* studies have shown that over 80 million people died in "The Great Leap Forward" and "The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution". To date, no real admissions have been made. The recent 'improvements' have been superficial. China still runs huge prison camps with millions of slave laborers, many incarcerated without trial, (and trials in China are often shams) and keeps millions of its citizens in a second-class citizenship internal-exile 'peasant' status, and these people are prohibited from moving or getting good jobs..and if they do try to move to cities, they have no legal rights..

    Plus, China sends tens of thousands of starving North Korean refugees back to North Korea (often to be summarily executed for the 'treason' of trying to flee Kim Jong Il's 'paradise'.) in violation of international law..

    Birds of a feather, flock together... (North Korea is, by far, the WORST human rights situation on Earth)

    And they also execute thousands of people a year, more than any other country, (except for North Korea) and sell their organs.. Often, they do a tissue match first, and execute the prisoners with the best match.. Isn't that creepy?

    Whoever says China is not a country with barbaric human rights practices.. man, that is some serious denial going on...

  150. Re:"In line with the Chinese government's IT polic by HiThere · · Score: 1

    You're probably right. All tyrants have strong similarities.

    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  151. Re:Not really when M$ is dumping in places like Ch by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    You can check my sig if you want some more info, but the executive summary is:
    MS has dropped the price of MS Windows to an insanely low price in Thailand, but only for computers under the governments new low-cost computer initiative, which come with a localized version of Linux. One can only assume that this is not to combat piracy, but to reduce the number of these one million machines that will reach home with LinuxTLE still on them.

  152. For God's sake! Why all these OFFTOPIC discussion? by tungwaiyip · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We are only talking about the product plan of a commerical company in Hong Kong! What the hell does it have to do with Tibet or People's Liberation Army!!! Next time when Intel or AMD develop a new CPU, does we have to discuss about everything from Ku Klux Klan to Hiroshima to the peril of Palestinian to the bloodshed in Iraq? Why do we have all these reflexive responses about Tibet whenever China is mentioned?

    Take your political discussion to the appropiate forum. As far as this article is concerned, this is OFFTOPIC.

  153. Redhat support both traditional and simplified by tungwaiyip · · Score: 1

    In general I find Linux has taken great care of internationalization. I can use my Redhat to display both traditional and simplified Chinese. What else does Midori offers? Maybe it actually translate all messages into Chinese?

  154. Allow Me to Explain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hong Kong is part of China. The Chinese have developed a processor that will be the backbone of its information-technology infrastructure. It is an issue for the USA, economically and militarily.

    The Chinese government, via "China People's Daily", have several employees who post messages in American discussion boards whenever the topic of China arises. It is a concerted attempt at propaganda.

    I suggest that the moderators of Slashdot contact the former moderators of the old CNN message boards and the moderators of the current message boards at "The New York Times". Whenever a message that criticizes China appears in either of those message boards, the message boards suddenly become inundated with mysterious messages that viciously attack the parent message.

    A similar game is being played here, on SlashDot, by pro-China posters. They deliberately try to sway the moderators to mod down messages criticizing China. Several of the pro-China posters are affiliated with the Chinese government.

  155. Flamebait whaaaa by ratfynk · · Score: 1
    Flamebait? whaa you guys are taking yourselves a little too seriously. I was making a joke about a friggin' abucus. I would love to see the Chinese kick the shit out of Intel, in the Oriental market.
    At least you can bet they will get their math right!
    I am almost willing to bet that they will come out with a dirt cheap 64 bit bus on a board first! IBM, MS and INTEL have all deliberately held this back.


    Tiny alien math profs like Intels Pentiums because they make them laugh.

    --
    OH THE SHAME I fell off the wagon and use sigs again!
  156. OffTopic: Why I read /. by WasteOfAmmo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    [begin ontopic]
    On one hand it is great to have another processor go mainstream in the PC market. This helps keep the prices low, increases the variety of hardware and software development, provides yet another area for hacking (the hobbyist type not the 5cr1p7 k1ddy type), and helps move technology into areas previously limited by economic or political factors.

    On the other hand, as much as I like to explore new toys rarely do I have the resources to gamble on new unproven technologies (both time and money, sigh). So it is unlikely that I would consider buying such a system instead of an Intel or AMD box (in fact although I own an older AMD box, if I bought today I would probably lean towards Intel slightly just to reduce any "apparent" or "preceived" risk). Since statistically speaking I am not alone in this opinion new technologies like the Dragon probably have a long battle in front of them to gain any market share in countries with established "mainstream" technologies.
    [end ontopic]

    This has to be said...
    The various comments made in this story is a classic example of one of the reasons I read ./. Not only to I get a reasonable sample of targetted news stories that appeal to my interests, more importantly, I get a variety of views and opinions from people on both sides of many issues. To often I find that following only local (read as: local to North America in my case) media that I hear only snippets , single sides, or limited scopes of many international issues. Many times I do not even hear of some issues that are happening globally that for various reasons are not carried by local media. Reading the posted comments from a variety of people all over the world (and listening to late night CBC radio; news from other countries) gives me insight and knowledge of a more "worldly nature" rather then the limited scope presented by local media.

    Most importantly the comments are by "real people" as opposed to executive summaries presented by media which may be following personal agenda's. Sure you can say "you give weight to the *insert whatever derogatory adjective* posted by the select group of *insert whatever derogatory adjective* people?!", but even taking that into account I still gain a variety of good information on many topics I would otherwise not have. Examples included but not limited to are:

    • the thread on China in this story
    • the many comments on/from persons living in Quebec Canada in previous /. stories (even the news in my own Country does not always reflect what the "little person" thinks)
    • the various discussion on the War with Iraq from non-North Americans
    and the list could go on and on.

    Yes, /. have its share of trolls, useless arguments, and cannon fodder type posting but it has its share of "interesting" and "insightful" posts also (otherwise you would not be reading this :) ).

    In a nutshell, thank you readers of /. for broadening my horizons and giving me a wealth of consice information that I would otherwise not have had (due to lack of time to research and lack of awareness of the entire issue).

    Merlin. P.S. and hey, even though this post may not show it, I am actually improving in both grammer and spelling thanks to a select group of /. readers :-)

  157. security implications for the People's Republic by heroine · · Score: 1

    More like security implications for the US republic, considering we're going to be using almost exclusively the Chinese chip, not the other way around.

  158. There is no such thing as IP by alexo · · Score: 1

    > If they reduce their reliance on foreign IP (or non-free foreign IP) [...]

    "Intellectual Property" is a contradiction in terms.
    the intellect deals with ideas and ideas cannot be anyone's property.

    Unless you meant this IP.

  159. Nostalgia by alexo · · Score: 1

    > One other thing, 100 years ago, America was practically 3rd world in terms of labor conditions. There were labor riots, slave labor conditions, factories that burned down with the workers inside (fire escapes doors locked to prevent the workers from sneaking off), etc. etc.

    Don't worry, your corporations are doing everything within their power to bring back that golden age.

  160. You just couldn't control your stupidity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You left-wing whiners...
    WTF.. are you an idiot?
  161. Best. Flame war. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *nt*

  162. Don't you mean -873?!? by Markvs · · Score: 1

    "Tibet has been an independent country (even an empire at times) in Central Asia since about 1000 BCE." That's -873 by the Tibetan Calendar. (http://mypage.direct.ca/w/wattj/Western.htm) (2130 -3003= -873)).

    I really, really, really dislike the "Before Common Era" CRAP that has become vogue of late.
    It's Anno Domini guys. You may not believe in the Christian God. You may not believe in God at all.

    BUT the civilized world accepts the AD dating system. Period. People don't go around with 36 or 48 hour days, though it is possible. Saying "1000 BCE" means about the same as "4492 by the Coptic Calendar". However with BCE, because you're still dating from the birth of Jesus Christ, you're only putting a Politically Correct name to it.

    If you want to make a break, do METRIC TIME. At least that's a standard the rest of the world acknowledges for measurement. (Check out http://www.indwes.edu/Faculty/bcupp/things/metrict m.htm).

    >Soapbox$:/off

    --
    46. The Hobo smiles, his eyes glaze over, and he burps. "Beware the man who has lived longer than the Wasteland."
  163. How do they work? by randomErr · · Score: 1

    So, um how well do they work compared to say Intel or IBM 68000 chips? Will they be competively priced? How long before one turns up in defence dept. mainframe?

    --
    You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
  164. Your anti-Taiwan stance.. by fliptout · · Score: 1

    is silly. I'm quite happy to have my Taiwanese girlfriend here. And many Taiwanese want nothing to do with the current regime in Beijing.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  165. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You contradict yourself. The point is precisely to keep technology out of the hands of totalitarian governments. See, people want to run from them but they their govs keep them by force. So other methods to obtain security should be sought. Exactly the original poster point - that you so mightily confused.

  166. green not-tea by gacp · · Score: 1

    hint: it's a green tea from Uruguay, Paraguay, and Argentina

    You forgot southern Brazil :-)

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
  167. Re:Fire-Breathing Dragon Burns Americans and Tibet by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

    Wow... +5 Interesting...

    Mods really have no brains otherwise they would realise this is the troll it is (and author has experience of anit-China trolls).

  168. Poindexter should have been canned for TIA Not PAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I actually want to learn more about PAM. As weird as PAM sounds, we need something better than political intelligence. Can we ever get objective intelligence from self-serving political organizations? Any system that might address this would be welcome, even if it some evil free-market dead pool.