Slashdot Mirror


Rio Announces Networked Ogg Vorbis Player

Alexander writes "Rio has announced several players, among them the Karma 20GB Ogg Vorbis music player, which also sports Ethernet as the preferred connection method. Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptance?" There's more information on the new Rio line-up via an article at The Register.

356 comments

  1. 40GB, too! by Arthaed · · Score: 5, Informative

    And don't forget that according to this link, there is also going to be a 40GB for around $499!

    --
    Unique signatures are rare.
    1. Re:40GB, too! by garcia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just this weekend I just purchased a Panasonic (SL-SX420) portable CD player that happens to read MP3 CDs too. It was $39.99 at BestBuy. I was shopping around for a portable MP3 player but couldn't see spending $200 on a 20GB Nomad or even more for an iPod.

      For those of you more unfortunate poor people (like myself), perhaps this player would better suit your needs.

    2. Re:40GB, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      too bad it doesn't read ID3 tags. Does it scroll the iso9660 filename across the screen? I'm sure that's informative.

    3. Re:40GB, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. It just tells you what "Album" number and what "Track" number you are currently playing.

    4. Re:40GB, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penny arcade says otherwise

      and for another $20, you can get an mp3-cd player.
      maybe another $20 for a 100-spindle of cd-r's, and you've got 65gb of storage.

    5. Re:40GB, too! by LazyBoy · · Score: 1

      Penny Arcade said it best.


      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

    6. Re:40GB, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be australian

    7. Re:40GB, too! by Fallen_Knight · · Score: 1

      I bet the sound is crap (the diffrence between my 200 CND sony and a 100 CND generic is HUGE)

      and probley is lacking in features

    8. Re:40GB, too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did you guess mate?

    9. Re:40GB, too! by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I've kind of settled in on the CD/MP3 players as my preference around the house/car as well.

      Mostly because I have a CD/MP3 player in the car (a JVC model that's 2yrs old). For auto use, the CD/MP3 style makes sense because it's easier to pull a CD from the visor and insert it, hit the random button and off you go - compared to trying to find a sub-folder on a 40Gb hard-drive based MP3 player.

      I also have a CD/MP3 portable player (actually 2). Plus, the newer DVD drives support MP3 files on CD-R (although my Sony lacks a *random* function! grrr). So now I have yet another device to use my MP3s on.

      The hard-drive based MP3 players are nice in situations where you can spend time concentrating on the screen to find the music that you want. Or when you absolutely have to have that much music on demand.

      I've been tempted by the smaller mini-CD/MP3 players that take the 180Mb CD-Rs, but I think I'm going to hold out for the mini DVD-R instead (those hold around 1Gb). Same size as the mini-CDs, but large enough capacity to be useful.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  2. music length by IFF123 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    finally: a player with 2 weeks of continuous music.....

    --
    Who took my tinfoil hat?
    1. Re:music length by ikkonoishi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Now if only the battery would last longer than 2.5 minutes.

    2. Re:music length by phrenzy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Now if only the battery would last longer than 2.5 minutes

      15 hours in fact - c'mon, it's a very small gadget and hard disks suck current! A certain other well known player only manages 8 hours.

      Rob

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
    3. Re:music length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get between 12-14 hours on my second gen 10GB iPod. Not only that, I can store about 55 hours of non-stop audio on that my iPod. I think that the reason for the battery life is that I mostly listen to either books on tape, or Old Time Radio shows, which tend to be about 3MB - 5MB in size, but have 30 - 50 minutes of audio. Not having to spin up the hard drive every 10 minutes makes a huge difference.

    4. Re:music length by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably get better battery life on iPod because of the much lower bitrate of most audiobooks, resulting in less power drainage.

      Gen2 iPod have mediocre battery life. They wanted to make them smaller, so they cut down the batteries.

      Steve Jobs is all style, no substance, in so many ways.

      They'll pay for it, now that Karma is emerging.

  3. Give to xiph if you use these. by Thinkit3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cynics are numerous and void of ideas. Ignore them. I hope Rio is giving to Xiph for using Ogg (I hear Xiph takes contracts to develop for a particular hardware), but anyone getting one of these should be donating. If Rio says they are giving a portion of the proceeds to Xiph, I'd be even more likely to buy from them.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
    1. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      anyone getting one of these should be donating.
      I can hear those "Flamebait" mods being cocked already, but ... in a word ... why?

      If Xiph wants to make money off Ogg, they should sell it. If I want to donate money, I'll donate it to cancer research or something.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except the free software nazis always forget that "free" software wouldn't be very popular if it weren't available at no cost. Go smoke a spliff RMS, nobody gives a flying fuck.

    3. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      I could just as well argue that Xiph donates to Rio, because this helps encourage adoption of the format! It's hard trying to explain to people in a company why its products should support a format "no-one uses", that requires development effort to integrate and marketing effort to justify/explain. I prefer Ogg Vorbis and I'm very happy I can buy a cute audio gadget now - but I don't agree with your tellng me who I should donate to, especially when I'm helping Ogg Vorbis become a standard by buying the hardware (which, you could say, is an indirect donation to Xiph, so maybe we agree in principle after all).

      PS (plug) The last thing I donated to was www.somafm.com a couple days ago. (/plug)

    4. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      why?
      Theoretically: because you care about the outcome and can make a difference. Because giving to Xiph is a way to make the world become more like what you want it to be.
      If I want to donate money, I'll donate it to cancer research or something.
      Hey, fine, whatever is most important to you, back it.

      In my case, I care more about Xiph than cancer research. The reaper must come for us all, and I don't think I'll escape him in the end. But I think I do see a way for programmers and users to avoid ever having to debase themselves by grovelling at MPEG's (or Microsoft's, or Apple/Sorenson's) feet, begging permission to do something with their own computers.

      Another thing about cancer research, is that I wouldn't have the slightest clue how my money would be used, or whether or not it would really make a difference. OTOH, Xiph is pretty open about its needs, and it's satisfying to realize that I can give them a few percent of their budget. If there were 20 or 30 of us, we could keep Monty employed full time. And the one thing everyone should have noticed by now is that Monty delivers. This isn't some kind of speculative gamble. Vorbis is here now, and it works, and it rocks. And it's going to get even better, and get supported by more and more devices, because people who care about it are going to make it happen.

      Compare that to what you get out of cancer research.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    5. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      I'm so stupid and I'm very sorry about the plug. No one has said anything. but I should have thought first. I'm giving up Slashdot for a while. Stupid stupid stupid.

    6. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope Rio is giving to Xiph for using Ogg (I hear Xiph takes contracts to develop for a particular hardware), but anyone getting one of these should be donating. If Rio says they are giving a portion of the proceeds to Xiph, I'd be even more likely to buy from them.

      Um, no. One of the advantages of open source is that you don't have to pay anyone. Sure, I like it when companies support open source development, but I like it even more when open source development continues without any funding at all.

    7. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by lamp540 · · Score: 1

      I would say that the advantage your speaking of is that you aren't FORCED to pay anyone. There's nothing wrong with helping someone out who helps you, in fact, it's down right neighborly.

    8. Re:Give to xiph if you use these. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get the point of free software, do you?

      I want the freedom to freely use, modify and redistribute the software. This is why I prefer free software over proprietary software, not because of price.

      But if the author retains exclusive rights to the software and only makes it available through selling it, then the software is no longer worth paying for to me, and I'd rather go with a free alternative.

      Do you get the point?

  4. first post! by Chrontius · · Score: 1

    Woohoo!

    Of course, Ogg is good for Sonic|BLUE since they don't have to liscense an MPEG decoder for each player they sell, correct?

    1. Re:first post! by tuffy · · Score: 4, Informative
      Of course, Ogg is good for Sonic|BLUE since they don't have to liscense an MPEG decoder for each player they sell, correct?
      All their players still have mp3 support, so some sort of MPEG decoding license is necessary. But the Vorbis support costs them nothing extra in licensing.
      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:first post! by RadioheadKid · · Score: 1

      Sonic Blue does not exist anymore.

      --
      "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
    3. Re:first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No! It is a frosty pist failure!!

    4. Re:first post! by Chrontius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, you got me there, but it's still going to be a feature that most geeks consider when they look at the Rio players, which makes it a Good Thing(tm) for them to do.

    5. Re:first post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's different ways of licensing mp3 technology. You can do it per piece of hardware or software, or you can just work out a flat fee.

  5. Rio Car by SuperQ · · Score: 4, Informative

    The software that runs on the thing is based on the software used in the Empeg linux player.. the Karma runs linux, and has a usb2 hub, not a client.. lots of hack potential.

    1. Re:Rio Car by ChiefArcher · · Score: 1

      And with the possibility of paying $1399 to SCO...
      I'm still worried (not) about SCO making me pay $1399 for my tivo. (yeah.. i know.. it's not a 2.4 kernel)

    2. Re:Rio Car by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Unlike some previous Empeg/Rio products, the Karma does not run Linux. It runs Ecos, the popular open-source embedded OS. The firmware isn't designed to be modified like the Rio Central or car-player was.

      (It always used to gall me slightly that the Rio Central and car-player were described as "hackable", with the implication that people customising them were outwitting us in some way, whereas in fact we put a good deal of effort into making them geek-customisable...)

      Peter

    3. Re:Rio Car by boopus · · Score: 1

      It doesn't actually run linux, unfortunatly. The sofware is based on the Empeg, wich runs linux, but the karma doesn't.

    4. Re:Rio Car by prator · · Score: 1

      (It always used to gall me slightly that the Rio Central and car-player were described as "hackable", with the implication that people customising them were outwitting us in some way, whereas in fact we put a good deal of effort into making them geek-customisable...)

      You shouldn't feel that way. The label of being "hackable" makes the device more desirable for a lot of us. Let us feel like we're doing something dirty and get more sales in the process. Sounds like a good deal to me.

      -prator

    5. Re:Rio Car by Zaknafein500 · · Score: 1

      OT: Actually, if its a MIPS-based series 2 (or DirecTV DVR) it is running 2.4.

      --

      "The guide is definitive, reality is frequently inaccurate."
    6. Re:Rio Car by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Funny

      geek-customisable

      -This should be a marketing buzzword in a few years.

      However, you will only see it used to cover up a bug:

      Engineer: I still can't get the user interface to work right.
      Marketing person: That's OK, we'll just say it's geek-customisable, for the advanced user.

    7. Re:Rio Car by SuperQ · · Score: 1

      doh.. i should just shut up from now on, and re-read other-forum-not-mentioned posts before I slashdot :)

    8. Re:Rio Car by replicant108 · · Score: 1

      "Karma does not run Linux"

      OTOH Linux does run (at least partly) on karma.

    9. Re:Rio Car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cool. Where can I download their changes to the GPL'd software then? I need to modify the kernel.

    10. Re:Rio Car by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

      Hacking has gotten a bad name (as in breaking security measures), but I still like the meaning of improving/changing something, especially software. Check this out for more info.

      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
  6. Obligatory Slashdot reference.. by magsymp · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'd be happy with 20GB of Karma!!!

    (I think I just soiled myself).

    1. Re:Obligatory Slashdot reference.. by dlosey · · Score: 1

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

    2. Re:Obligatory Slashdot reference.. by artg · · Score: 1

      Would that be a choir ?

  7. Not a dupe! by wfberg · · Score: 1, Funny

    We'll have to wait for a dupe until ThinkGeek starts selling it..

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  8. Re:first post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The proof of the first posting is in the reading. -- Miguel de Cervantes

  9. Lineage 2 uses OGG for its sound. by mesmartyoudumb · · Score: 0

    New MMORPG called Lineage 2 uses OGG for its sound,at least in beta. :-)

    --
    "Comedy's a dead art form. Now tragedy, that's funny."
  10. Finally by ttyp0 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is exactly what I've been waiting for. There are lots of great MP3 players out there, but most depend on USB. I want something that I can use with my stereo system, and running a 30 ft CAT5 is much easier than 30ft of USB cable. Now only if it were 802.11. I think this device will definately have me looking at Ogg.

    Anti SCO T-Shirt. $1 donated to OSI Fund on each shirt.

    1. Re:Finally by Anil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe someone can hack it so that you could use a wireless USB NIC on the USB2 port. I guess it depends on if the device has a usable USB output port or a crazy one that takes a customized USB converter cable (haven't seen enough pictures to tell).

    2. Re:Finally by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Maybe someone can hack it so that you could use a wireless USB NIC on the USB2 port.

      Use an Ethernet-to-wireless bridge (e.g. WET11) on the Ethernet port. No hacking required.

      Peter

    3. Re:Finally by Dungus · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't work unless the devices are USB OTG compliant, which they aren't. You'd need a USB host in there, you can't just hook two USB devices together.

    4. Re:Finally by dlosey · · Score: 1

      Now only if it were 802.11. I think this device will definately have me looking at Ogg.

      I totally agree. If someone were to come out with a 802.11 solution that was in a small portable boombox, it would be a huge hit. Rio had their Rio Reciever(sorry no link) a few years back. You basically could have your computer broadcast a playlist over a LAN. With a wireless reciever, you could have your own radio station in the backyard.

    5. Re:Finally by upplepop · · Score: 2, Informative

      You might be interested in the Linksys Wireless-B Media Adapter. It uses 802.11b to distribute audio and images to your television. It includes a remote control used to control an GUI on your television.

    6. Re:Finally by elmegil · · Score: 1

      See above: get a ethernet to wireless bridge. I have a D-Link model that works like a champ for my HTPC, since in my 80-year-old house running hard wires across the entire house was not an option.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    7. Re:Finally by dlosey · · Score: 1

      Yes, I would agree that this is a good solution for a HTPC or any type of in-house appliance, such as the Rio Reciever.

      However, who wants to lug a whole reciever system, with detached speakers, outside. If I'm in the yard with some friends having a party, I just want to be able to pull out a radio and have instant access to a playlist I created on my machine. A small portable radio with a ethernet or wireless connection would be great. Quick and simple.

    8. Re:Finally by caldroun · · Score: 1

      Why 802.11? Here is a link to FM Transmitters for about I use my zaurus to control my PC playlist using Wifi and hear it using a transmitter talking to my radio.

      --
      "If you have done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways" -- hhgg
    9. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bitch bitch bitch. Will no one be satisfied? All I hear when cool shit comes out is "If only..." Just plug it into one of those mini netgear transcievers. It plays MP3s too, you know? You don't have to "look" at Ogg. It will play your existing collection now.

      You're one of those people that will never buy one of these things, because by the time they come out with one that has all the features you want *now*, there will be some brand spanking new technology that it won't have, thereby preventing you from buying it.

      Sheesh.

    10. Re:Finally by Saganaga · · Score: 1

      This has already been done. Some dude ripped the guts out of an old boombox he had laying around and added a Slimp3 device and a wireless bridge.

      Very cool; if only the Slimp3 wasn't $239...

    11. Re:Finally by zerocool^ · · Score: 1

      Let me just say "thank you" to you for chiming in on this discussion.

      In the same way people are more likely to buy webhosting from my company if they see that we actively read slashdot, I am more likely to buy this product becuase one of the lead developers is a slashdotter.

      I appreciate that.

      I will actually probably buy one of these. I have not had a hand held music device since i bought a portable CD player 5 years ago. It's been collecting dust.

      I've almost made the complete conversion to oggs - i don't download MP3's anymore (on principle - I don't listen to mainstream music, so I don't have problems buying albums, since indy albums are usually $10 (except for the new rancid - wtf?)) - so oggs are my format of choice. I've been waiting for someone to catch on.

      I'm probably looking at christmas, though. Need to save up.

      Does it support higher bitrates? I compress my oggs with "exact audio copy" at the "8 - high quality" setting, so they're much higher than the default somewhere-around-130kbps stuff.

      Does it have problems with VBR Mp3's?

      Again, thank you for your consideration and help here.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    12. Re:Finally by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      And as for OGG support for Codec CD players, iRiver is making (some) progress: ---------- [OGG status report] First of all thank you for your support and showing your interest to iRiver. iRiver would like to make an announcement about the OGG Codec. Plan for supporting OGG files: There are many customers who are wondering if iRiver would ever support OGG file formats. Technically, it is difficult to play an OGG file from a portable audio device. There is currently an OGG Codec available (only for non portable players) on www.xiph.org. According to this site, the Fixed Point version source "Tremor" is required to make an OGG Codec. This version is not optimized for Embedded (or portable) audio devices. To insert this Codec in the iRiver MP3 player, the size of source needs to be reduced by half. It is possible to reduce a source about 10 to 20% without making any major changes. Unfortunately, it is impossible to reduce the size of the source by 50% without changing the algorithm of the source. Since OGG file has been recently developed, there is not enough information or research result available to modify the algorithm of the source. iRiver is currently researching and developing a Codec that would allow OGG files to be played by a portable player with two side companies. Please wait patiently and iRiver will update you the research and development process of the new Codec. ---------- From: /me keeps hoping!

    13. Re:Finally by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      Whoops;
      And as for OGG support for Codec CD players, iRiver is making (some) progress:
      ----------
      [OGG status report]
      First of all thank you for your support and showing your interest to iRiver.
      iRiver would like to make an announcement about the OGG Codec.

      Plan for supporting OGG files:
      There are many customers who are wondering if iRiver would ever support OGG file formats. Technically, it is difficult to play an OGG file from a portable audio device. There is currently an OGG Codec available (only for non portable players) on www.xiph.org. According to this site, the Fixed Point version source "Tremor" is required to make an OGG Codec. This version is not optimized for Embedded (or portable) audio devices. To insert this Codec in the iRiver MP3 player, the size of source needs to be reduced by half. It is possible to reduce a source about 10 to 20% without making any major changes.
      Unfortunately, it is impossible to reduce the size of the source by 50% without changing the algorithm of the source. Since OGG file has been recently developed, there is not enough information or research result available to modify the algorithm of the source. iRiver is currently researching and developing a Codec that would allow OGG files to be played by a portable player with two side companies. Please wait patiently and iRiver will update you the research and development process of the new Codec.
      ----------
      From: http://iriver.com/ -> News /me keeps hoping for OGG support!

    14. Re:Finally by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      "However, who wants to lug a whole reciever system, with detached speakers, outside. If I'm in the yard with some friends having a party, I just want to be able to pull out a radio and have instant access to a playlist I created on my machine."

      LOL! Moron! You miss the point completely.

      You've never even been with a girl, have you. No, you haven't. Here's a useful hint for you: If you'd spend some time with girls, you'd stop coming away looking like this every night.

      Love ya.

  11. I suffer from Linux user mentality by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Funny
    The site doesn't jive with Mozilla (all jumbled up and the menus/DHTML is attrocious), therefore the company must suck.

    Oh, it plays Ogg. Well, if't less then $20 I'll buy it!

    1. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by The+Salamander · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I wouldn't go that far... but if a company's website functions poorly it does reflect negatively on the company and its products.

      I know I am definiately less likely to purchase something if can't easily access information on their products.

    2. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by TedCheshireAcad · · Score: 1

      Doesn't jive with Safari either.

      I was gonna buy one, being a Mac user and all, spending more money than I should on stuff I don't need just because it's cool.

      oh well, they lose.

    3. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by Shadestalker · · Score: 1

      With Ogg Vorbis support, they seem to be saying they recognize and want "geeks" to be part of their core audience. If that's really the case, why the mess of a web site? Seems like the product developers need to take the webheads in hand and educate them.

    4. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by gearheadsmp · · Score: 1

      It jives with my build of Firebird 0.6, so what better excuse to upgrade to Firebird?

    5. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by NNKK · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work with Firebird on my systems. I wouldn't expect it to, either -- gecko is gecko.

    6. Re:I suffer from Linux user mentality by joostje · · Score: 1

      It doesn't jive with Mozilla 1.5a -- so there you have an excuse not to upgrade to 1.5a:)

  12. Competition rocks by squarooticus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even though Digital Innovations got my money for being the first out of the gate with Neuros support for Ogg Vorbis, competition is always a good thing, and having more players that support Vorbis means lower prices and less potential for lock-in or obsolescence.

    Ogg Vorbis destroys MP3 in terms of quality, and is competitive with all of the newer proprietary codecs (e.g., AAC, MP3Pro, WMA) at high bitrates while providing much better performance than those at low bitrates (e.g., sub-64kbps).

    Don't let the intelligentsia decide whether Vorbis is the right codec for you or not: the free market will decide this question, and as a result of this development, that market just got more interesting.

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Competition rocks by grazzy · · Score: 3, Funny

      who cares about low bitrates, i want my cd-quality.

    2. Re:Competition rocks by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Sadly the Vorbis support in Neuros is very much still in beta, and completely unlistenable on any tunes above quality "5". Unfortunately, this covers nearly all my Vorbis collection and so the wait for a finalized firmware update is frustrating. I hope Neuros will get that firmware finished and add some FLAC support in the process (which should be considerably easier than Vorbis, since FLAC is all integer-ops already).

      If this new Karma player can handle all the Vorbis quality rates and FLAC - out of the box - I'll be picking one up.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    3. Re:Competition rocks by tuffy · · Score: 5, Informative
      who cares about low bitrates, i want my cd-quality.

      Then encode to FLAC, which this new player also supports. FLAC is CD quality (completely lossless) at half the space and is a completely open format.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    4. Re:Competition rocks by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      Agreed that the support is less than 100%. This wouldn't be a problem if bitpeeling were available, but no one on the Vorbis team seems willing to take on that project. Nonetheless, I have gotten many, many enjoytable Vorbis-playing hours out of my Neuros after re-encoding some music at -q3; it has already made my long weekend drives much more pleassant.

      --
      [ home ]
    5. Re:Competition rocks by boopus · · Score: 1

      Ogg may destroy the competition in terms of quality, but it wasn't designed with computing power in mind. You don't see ogg in every portable for the same reason that you don't see divx in every DVD player.

    6. Re:Competition rocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the primary reason you don't see Vorbis support in every player is that the market for it is too small to justify the development cost required to integrate the support. Since this is largely a chicken-and-egg problem, once a few players support Vorbis, the advantages of Vorbis will become a selling point for those players, and support will spread.

    7. Re:Competition rocks by tuffy · · Score: 1
      Agreed that the support is less than 100%. This wouldn't be a problem if bitpeeling were available, but no one on the Vorbis team seems willing to take on that project.

      Vorbis bitrate peeling seems to be an April Fools joke that's gotten way out of hand. The idea is apparently interesting, but the Vorbis format just isn't well suited to being "peeled" to lower bitrates, and so nobody is working to make it a reality :(

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    8. Re:Competition rocks by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, the Vorbis format is well-suited to being peeled, but the information resulting from the MDCT need to be ordered in a certain way; thus, current files would need to be partially-decoded and then re-encoded in order to support a fast peeler. I don't think it is an April Fool's gag (although Segher did pull one of those on us earlier this year), but it seems like a sufficiently large project that they will wait until either (a) someone on the team is really bored or (b) demand gets very high.

      --
      [ home ]
    9. Re:Competition rocks by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Moore's law will handle that soon enough.

    10. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      If this new Karma player can handle all the Vorbis quality rates and FLAC - out of the box - I'll be picking one up.

      We tested Karma with Vorbis bitrates up to 256Kbits/s VBR. Anyone using Vorbis at higher bitrates than that should IMO be using Flac.

      Peter

    11. Re:Competition rocks by tuffy · · Score: 1
      We tested Karma with Vorbis bitrates up to 256Kbits/s VBR. Anyone using Vorbis at higher bitrates than that should IMO be using Flac.

      Is the Karma likely to handle anything above 256kbit/s or will that cause it grief? I doubt anything in my collecion is encoded that high, but I'll need to run ogginfo over it to be sure.

      And, as long as I'm pestering a Rio employee, how is the ethernet support going to work? Will it be something simple like FTPing tunes onto the device or will extra software be required? (preferably not Windows-only)

      I'm really starting to want one now...

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    12. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Moore, unfortunately, wasn't in the battery business. CPU power for audio decoding is an extremely solved problem; plain old electrical power is not. Batteries have come on a lot in recent years, but if I were playing Civilisation right now I'd still be having people research batteries, not CPUs.

      Peter

    13. Re:Competition rocks by phrenzy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      With all respect to the cool Xiph guys, porting Tremor to an embedded platform was a complete bitch. Well, a semi bitch at least. It's clear that the format was not designed with small architectures in mind (some of the comments in the source seem to confirm this). A few questionable design choices have definitely set this format back in terms of CE adoption.

      There's no problem that can't be overcome in time though.

      Rob

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
    14. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      And, as long as I'm pestering a Rio employee, how is the ethernet support going to work?

      You plug it in. If there's a DHCP server, it DHCPs, otherwise it autonets (UPnP-styley). Then it announces itself over SSDP multicast. If you're using Windows XP Home (or anything else that talks SSDP -- it's a completely open standard) an icon pops up in Network Neighbourhood. If you're using other sorts of Windows, an icon pops up in our own transfer software. Otherwise, you just point a web browser at it: there's a web server in it which will serve you a completely cross-platform Java applet to do your transfers.

      I don't know whether we'll be actively helping the open-source community to implement the Ethernet protocol this time, but it certainly wouldn't be rocket science to reverse-engineer it.

      Peter

    15. Re:Competition rocks by ubikkibu · · Score: 1

      > Don't let the intelligentsia decide whether
      > Vorbis is the right codec for you or not...

      WTF? I'd rather make an informed decision about anything than just "let the free market decide" for me.

    16. Re:Competition rocks by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      Someone else mentioned the possibility of interference with regards to having a CPU and FM tuner in the same package.

      What has been your experience with the Neuros? I would like to get one, mainly because it has a tuner and can encode mp3s as well. Have you had any problems with tuner reception or using the MyFi FM broadcast?

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    17. Re:Competition rocks by RoLi · · Score: 1

      Because of smaller structures, modern CPUs draw less power. (Well of course if you don't care about power you can also clock it higher and put a huge heatsink on it as well)

    18. Re:Competition rocks by squarooticus · · Score: 1

      I haven't had any trouble receiving FM signals on the Neuros, but I only listen to one station that broadcasts close to where I live. So, YMMV.

      As far as the transmitter goes, I find that depends more on the quality of the receiver: my stereo, for instance, can pick up the Neuros signal clear across the house (about 35' away), while my el-Cheapo $15 boom box can only receive it up to about 3 feet away.

      --
      [ home ]
    19. Re:Competition rocks by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      With Vorbis being tuned to higher bitrates, and with it scaling up bitrate for complex music, I'd be testing up to the 0.5Mbps level; that's still easily half the size of FLAC, and will ensure it's not going to fall over on particularly complex tracks.

      Now, we just need MusePack, ReplayGain, APEv2 tag support on MP3's, foobar2000-alike customisable playlist displays, and we'll be getting somewhere...

    20. Re:Competition rocks by lightcycle · · Score: 1

      I doubt you have anything above 256 Kb/s, since vorbis AFAIK doesn't use higher bitrates. Your parent post is quite right in that anyone who hears quality degradation at 256Kb/s Vorbis (Which would require a very good set of ears and speakers) probably should be using FLAC or other lossless formats

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
    21. Re:Competition rocks by LionMage · · Score: 1
      Otherwise, you just point a web browser at it: there's a web server in it which will serve you a completely cross-platform Java applet to do your transfers.

      So does this mean I could theoretically use the Karma with any ethernet-enabled computer with a compliant web browser and a decent Java implementation? I ask this because the web site for the Karma implies Windows compatibility, but not Mac OS X compatibility.

      What I'd really like to see is iTunes integration on the OS X side. Since many of the other players that were announced by Rio seem to be OS X compatible out of the box, I'm hopeful.
    22. Re:Competition rocks by ddennedy · · Score: 1

      Peter,
      I just wanted to express my thanks to you for hanging around here and providing information.
      This looks like just what I have been waiting for.

    23. Re:Competition rocks by Effugas · · Score: 1

      Peter,

      Does it speak SMB or not?

      I don't really care how we're discovering the thing...do we get to treat it as a hard drive or not?

      I'd be mildly amused if Samba built correctly on eCos :-)

      --Dan

    24. Re:Competition rocks by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 1

      otherwise it autonets (UPnP-styley)

      Ugh, any chance of ZeroConf support in a future version?

      --

      News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

    25. Re:Competition rocks by pdh11 · · Score: 1

      Ugh, any chance of ZeroConf support in a future version?

      Well, ZeroConf is the same as UPnP as far as IP address acquisition goes. As for the upper layers (multicast DNS and what-have-you), it's a possibility, but it's never clear how much those things are going to take off and we thought we'd test the waters with one standard at a time.

      Considering that Rendezvous and UPnP are both being developed in a reasonably open-standards kind of manner, it's a bit crap IMO that there's two of them.

      Peter

  13. Guess what I want for (winter_holiday)! by Limburgher · · Score: 0
    Guess what I want for (winter_holiday)!

    Maybe my (family_member) will get me one! I should make sure to let (him_her_them) know I'm interested.

    Seriously, gotta get me one. Looks awesome.

    --

    You are not the customer.

  14. Sounds good... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1, Funny

    but does it play WMP files?

    1. Re:Sounds good... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, it supports both WMA and MP3. FINALLY, a device that supports both WMA and MP3, in addition to Ogg Vorbis!!! (sarcasm intended)

    2. Re:Sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but does it play WMP files?

      Yes, and it even plays teh latest Winamp files!!!!1

    3. Re:Sounds good... by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does anybody actually have any WMA files? That contain music? That they actually listen to? I don't even know where i would get a program that rips CD's to WMA. Why does everything always include support for WMA when nobody really uses it?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Sounds good... by grennis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Does anybody actually have any WMA files?

      Yes

      That contain music?

      Yes

      That they actually listen to?

      I have my whole 300 CD music collection ripped to WMA. (You can just turn off DRM).

      I don't even know where i would get a program that rips CD's to WMA.

      That is a silly thing to say... its called Windows Media Player (duh)

      Why does everything always include support for WMA when nobody really uses it?

      With WMP 9: Better compression, better audio quality, and, like you said, universal and total support. I guess when you say "nobody" you mean "nobody except the 95% of users out there running Windows"

    5. Re:Sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I have my whole 300 CD music collection ripped to WMA."

      Guess you are stuck with Windows for as long as you want to listen to those.

    6. Re:Sounds good... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "Does anybody actually have any WMA files? That contain music? That they actually listen to? I don't even know where i would get a program that rips CD's to WMA. Why does everything always include support for WMA when nobody really uses it?"

      I always transcode to WMA when transferring files to my 64MB Nomad II MG. Since it only supports MP3, WAV and WMA, the best quality at low bitrate of those three is WMA. Of course my originals are in FLAC or OGG. So basically I'm saying that WMA is generally there because it has better low bitrate performance than MP3. Of course OGG blows all that away so they probably included it 'by tradition' in the karma player.

      As to encoding to WMA, it's very common if you're using windows. Most major rip/encode programs will let you encode to it if you look through the options. I just use WinAMP's WMA output plugin myself.

    7. Re:Sounds good... by steveha · · Score: 1

      Does anybody actually have any WMA files?

      Sure. Lots of people. But why do you even care?

      Big ROMs are cheap these days. How does it hurt you if they add WMA support, in addition to MP3, Vorbis, and maybe AAC, Audible, and XYZ and PDQ?

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    8. Re:Sounds good... by GreyWanderingRogue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Careful with this one. The response to this one is fairly obvious. A program that rips CD's to WMA? It's called Media Player. After updating to MP9 (desire to have everything up-to-date is still too hard to resist, even though I rarely use it; and, yes, I realize I'm using Windows XP), upon my first use it asked if I wanted to convert all of my MP3's to WMA. The first time I put in a CD, it asked if I wanted to always have Media Player rip the CD to WMA files automatically. (Both of which I declined.) Because these are default settings, the average click-yes/ok-to-everything-user is bound to start having a collection of WMA files (or at least those who actually purchase CD's and don't just download all their music). Because MP3's were around first, people recognize what they are. If given a choice by a program (Rip to MP3 or WMA or even OGG for that matter), they recognize MP3 and will select it, which is why it's still the defacto standard. WMA is starting to dent that, though. If my memory is correct, it helps that you can't rip to MP3 directly. If you want MP3's, it links you to a site with plug-ins for purchase that can handle the MP3 format. As you might guess, most people aren't looking to pay for the software to listen to their encoded music.

    9. Re:Sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Guess you are stuck with Windows for as long as you want to listen to those.
      Yes, Windows. And X-Windows.
    10. Re:Sounds good... by grennis · · Score: 1

      Why is that a problem? I'm pretty sure Windows and WMA will be around a lot longer than something called "ogg varbis".

    11. Re:Sounds good... by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      I guess when you say "nobody" you mean "nobody except the 95% of users out there running Windows"

      Well, technically speaking anyone using Windows is a nobody...

    12. Re:Sounds good... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Weapons of Mass Annoyance?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    13. Re:Sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WMA9? Universal and total support?... riiiight. I'm not even getting into that. It's been nothing but a headache.

  15. Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Using ethernet to transfer the data seems like it's a great idea and long overdue in the portable media player market...

    Although with the advent of firewire and usb2.1, it doesn't seem that big anymore

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by tomstdenis · · Score: 4, Informative

      insightful?

      Um, neither usb or firewire are rated for the distances of ethernet [cat5]. I think *that* is the point. E.g. your computer in one room and the home stereo + tv + stuff in another.

      Plus you can get 30ft of cat5 for about as much as 6ft of usb retail [sick!]. :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by josquin00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I probably should RTFA more carefully, but I wonder if you can use this as a networked music server/file share, or if it only synchronizes to one machine? As someone who does freelance tech work, it'd be nice (read: fulfill my geek desires) to carry my toolset and my music all on one device.

    3. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by frodo+from+middle+ea · · Score: 1

      Ever wondered what is the price diff. between a 30 Feet Cat5 and a 30 Feet Firewire/USB 2.0 Cable ?

      --
      for the last time people, I am "frodo from middle eaRTH", not "middle eaST".
    4. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see an ipod sized player with 802.11b. We've already got a small hand-full of DVD players with 802.11b, which is promising.

    5. Re:Ethernet connection method, long overdue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MANHAM

  16. What's with the aesthetics? by ilsie · · Score: 3, Funny

    They all look like they were designed by Mike Brady.

  17. Looking for WiFi by jdray · · Score: 1

    In a pocket-sized box, I'd be looking for Wi-Fi rather than a cabled connection. USB would suffice for music transfers over a cable.

    Of course, if its got Ethernet and runs Linux, it'll be hacked into a server in about ten minutes after it's been released to market.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  18. MP3, too by aridhol · · Score: 1

    Looks like this one does MP3s as well, so you don't have to worry about MP3s you already have. Of course you could convert them, but you lose more quality (lossy-to-lossy conversion loses more than either original encoding).

    --
    I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    1. Re:MP3, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      lossy-to-lossy conversion loses more than either original encoding

      thank you professor geek

  19. Slashdot Review: by mr_luc · · Score: 3, Funny

    Slashdot review...

    Karma: Excellent

    Thank you.

  20. Nice to see Rio joining! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know about the Neuros Player (right? right?!) but it's nice to see Rio join to help us crush those dirty abberations known as mp3 files. *spit* OGG SHALL PREVAIL!!!

  21. The RIO people are really cool. by scorp1us · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have an old empeg. No longer made, but they still find time to make refinemenats toit. They are a bunch of linux geeks like the rest of us. Since Tremor (the fixed-point Ogg decoder) came out, there's not been any reason to not have Ogg. They've got a tight code base too, and if they can find the time, the old empeg people might get the capability to play Ogg, which is something I've been requesting a while. But these discontunued products are last on the priority list. The 3.0 alpha code plays on the player, and when it goes beta, we (empeg owners) might just get Ogg...

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:The RIO people are really cool. by phrenzy · · Score: 4, Informative
      The 3.0 alpha code plays on the player, and when it goes beta, we (empeg owners) might just get Ogg..

      You bet - Karma builds from the same codebase as the car player (although it runs eCos not Linux due to code size and lack of an MMU).

      3.0 already plays Ogg, and will get released when we're done with our seven (count em) new products. It's been a bit hectic around here lately!

      Rob
      (formerly of empeg, now Rio)

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
    2. Re:The RIO people are really cool. by uradu · · Score: 1

      Wish you guys hadn't abandoned the Riot. It had some shortcomings, but a nice UI and some other nice details.

    3. Re:The RIO people are really cool. by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Well no wonder it's not available yet... the entire staff of empeg appear to spend all day Slashdotting instead of doing any work :P

  22. ipod size comparison by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Informative

    RioKarma 20:
    20G 2.7 x 3.0 x 0.90 = 7.29 inch^3 5.5oz

    ipod specs
    10G 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.62 = 6.10 inch^3 5.6oz
    15G 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.62 = 6.10 inch^3 5.6oz
    30G 4.1 x 2.4 x 0.73 = 7.18 inch^3 6.2oz

    So it's pretty comprable size-wise and breaks from the pcmcia 1.8" hard drive mold (0.20" x 2.13" x 3.37") that defines the ipod.

    1. Re:ipod size comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you don't have to send any money to an evil empire like Apple.

    2. Re:ipod size comparison by Lussarn · · Score: 1, Troll

      Good call!

    3. Re:ipod size comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the website neglects to mention that the 20GB Karma is 0.2" skinnier than the 40GB. So, using your format, we have:

      RioKarma:
      20G 2.7 x 3.0 x 0.70 = 5.67 inch^3 5.5oz
      40G 2.7 x 3.0 x 0.90 = 7.29 inch^3 5.9oz

  23. A good MP3 player is more than technical gimmickry by __aamkky7574 · · Score: 3, Informative
    This is great, just as long as Rio improve their build quality and service. I've had two Rio Volts; the first started pausing for no apparent reason. The second works, but is plagued by minor tics, a battery case that never stays shut, huge startup times, jumps in sound and skipping even when playing MP3s.

    After the third remote control broke, and I tried to buy a new one from Rio itself (rather than Amazon, where I bought it) it turned out that not only would they not ship items from their e-store, they would even accept a non-US credit card it (when I tried to buy and have it sent to a US friend to send on to me). Needless to say, I'm not impressed by a company quite happy to take foreigner's money while giving them a shoddy service.

    P.

  24. what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. Size Comparison by devnullkac · · Score: 1

    From the listed specs, it appears that this device is almost exactly the size, shape, and weight of two boxes of paperclips side-by-side.

    --
    What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
    1. Re:Size Comparison by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      Hmm so that's 1/65535th of a volkswagon beetle?
      And it holds how many libraires of congress?
      Give us some useful measurments here!

    2. Re:Size Comparison by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Well, according to my crude calculations, it can hold 0.000769231 libraries of congress, working on the basis that they have 2.6 million recordings, which if (and it's a big if) they encode them like I encode my music (190k oggs), average out at about 5mb each.

      Giving and impressive 13 *terra*bytes of recordings. And according to my rusty maths, 10gb is 0.000769231 of 13tb.

      QED

  26. Drat! by bytesmythe · · Score: 4, Informative
    Trying to find a music player that does what I want is annoying. The closest I've seen so far is the Neuros, actually.

    The problem with the Karma here is it doesn't appear to have a radio tuner, unlike the Neuros. The Neuros also:

    • Broadcasts on a locally unused FM frequency so you can transmit it to a nearby radio.
    • Record and encode MP3s from any source (internal radio tuner or line-in). [I have been told that recording to OGG is a possible future firmware update.]
    • The syncing software is being ported to linux.
    • If they come out with a higher capacity, you just get a new storage "backpack". No need to buy an entirely new unit.

    The main thing the Neuros doesn't have that I would like is a line-out, but oh well. It does nearly everything else I'd want.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:Drat! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio tuners and fast CPUs and buses don't play well together, kinda like microwaves and 802.11.

      Most tuner-enabled MP3 players are plagued with poor reception. Unfortunately, since the average consumer is unable to comprehend why that is, and unable to accept poor reception, tuners are rarely included.

    2. Re:Drat! by Compuser · · Score: 1

      Hmm, so why is it? All you would need is to
      put your CPU and associated PCBs inside a
      well-designed Faraday cage (say, dual line it
      with copper and mu-metal). Put your receiver and
      tuner on a separate PCB elsewhere and it should
      work. It shouldn't even cost that much more,
      and I am sure an extra $100-200 for this would
      be acceptable for the market.

    3. Re:Drat! by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      USB 1.1 only is a pretty major negative, though. Anything with a 20GB HDD HAS to have a higher speed transfer method...

    4. Re:Drat! by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      The next 20 GB backpack has USB2.0, and it's a free upgrade for people who purchase a 20GB model on or before August 31, 2003.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    5. Re:Drat! by comajelly · · Score: 1
      • Record and encode MP3s from any source (internal radio tuner or line-in). [I have been told that recording to OGG is a possible future firmware update.]
      The MP3 encoder for the Neuros' TI chip took at least three expert-engineer-years to write; it may have been six or nine.
      We'd need to clone Monty repeatedly to get a Vorbis encoder working on the device in a timely fashion; there are also other things to do, like producing bugfix releases, some low-bitrate tuning to make sure vorbis is solidly above codecs with SBR (spectral band replication). Then there's Theora, OggFile, and Vorbis II. Not guaranteed in that order.

      Nathan Sharfi
      Webmaster, Xiph.Org
    6. Re:Drat! by ed1park · · Score: 1

      Although I'm sure the Neuros is nice, my vote goes for the NexIIe player. There is a newer version that has a FM Tuner and recording, but i'm not that interested to upgrade at this point.

      - Uses 2 regular AA for 10-15 hours. Convenient when I forget to charge extra NiMH's. Alkalines are everywhere.
      - Uses Compact Flash. I use a nice 1GB card. Bigger sizes and cheaper prices all the time. No need for large backpacks. the player seems smaller than a pack of cards.
      - OGG support maybe possible via firmware, but I'll believe it when I see it. I'll probably upgrade my player by that time anyway...

  27. Geek Priorities by Talia+Starhawke · · Score: 1

    You know you have your priorities straight when you buy a geek toy that's more than your rent!

    --
    +5, Female ;)
    1. Re:Geek Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And where the hell do you live that $399 is more than your rent? Your mother's basement? Before I bought my house I was paying $1100 per month in rent.

    2. Re:Geek Priorities by Talia+Starhawke · · Score: 1

      I live in North Dakota, where the wages suck, but the rent is cheap! My apartment is a 2-bedroom... of course, even here, you get what you pay for...

      --
      +5, Female ;)
    3. Re:Geek Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. That explains it then.

    4. Re:Geek Priorities by lamp540 · · Score: 1

      You probably got ripped off on your house, too.

  28. Powerful tools include cross-fader... by jalano · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Powerful tools include cross-fader..."


    Does this mean we *finally* have a portable mp3 player (non-cd based) that can play back gapless recordings? This is one of the few features that has held me back from buying an iPod.

    1. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by phrenzy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Does this mean we *finally* have a portable mp3 player (non-cd based) that can play back gapless recordings?

      It plays gapless anyway, unless your encoder has inserted masses of blank frames (which you can trim with various utilities).

      The cross fader is for radio style mixes, which works particularly well if you're on random playback from your entire music collection. The last few seconds of the current track will cross fade into the first few seconds of the next track - I leave this switched on most of the time now. You would turn it off for continuous mixes though.

      Rob

      --
      -- Freddie Starr ate my empeg
    2. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by jalano · · Score: 1

      Wow, you have one of these already?

      I encode with lame --nogap and it works great with software players such as xmms, but I have yet to find any hardware-based players which will be able to play it back with no gap.

      I'm not interested in doing random mixes - I'd just like to listen to albums the way they were intended, with tracks that smoothly transition from one to the other. This is common in classical concert performances, and with DJ-ed trance mixes.

    3. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Have one? He is one. We build a Slashdot astroturfing bot into each unit -- that's what the Ethernet is for.

      Peter

    4. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But did you include the "FAQ Master" bot or did you just arrange for Tony to be cloned? (again)

    5. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you have one of these already?

      Yeah, well, he works for Rio.

    6. Re:Powerful tools include cross-fader... by Bj�rn+Stenberg · · Score: 1
      Actually, gapless mp3 playback has worked in Rockbox for a long time if your mp3 data doesn't contain gaps.

      Use the --nogaps option in lame to create gapless mp3 tracks. Of course you also need a player that actually plays the frames back-to-back, and doesn't insert artificial pauses between tracks. I've heard conflicting reports about the Ipod in this regard.

  29. You get to use Ogg too... by Thinkit3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but someone else may donate twice what your share should have been.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  30. Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptance? by willll · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The answer to this question is irrelevant. The real question is "Is Ogg Vorbis gaining consumer acceptance?" It doesn't matter if the music industry thinks Ogg Vorbis is good, as long as consumers aren't using it. And the answer to the question is a definite no. How many people talk about ogg sharing, the same way they talk about mp3 sharing? How many casual music downloaders have heard of Ogg Vorbis, let alone know what it is? As long as these numbers are low, products for playing ogg files will fail, and the industries acceptance of Ogg Vorbis won't matter, until consumers play ogg's instead of mp3's, and know that they are using ogg's.

  31. OpenSource Music by devphaeton · · Score: 0

    Alright! All you need now is OpenSource Music! Start by getting this song here!. Ph33r a day in the life of a geek.

    --


    do() || do_not(); // try();
  32. Neuros extensibility. by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    The nice thing about the Neuros is the "backpack" system used, which will allow users to upgrade to USB2 and/or a bigger hard drive in the future.

  33. Re:Sounds bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Personally, I'm waiting for a portable player that supports open source codecs from the future.

  34. Opera chokes too by teklob · · Score: 1

    I can't view the site in mozilla firebird or opera properly, so I can't see if the price is listed there, but I've been looking for somethign to replace my 4 year old minidisc player and depending on the price, this could be really good. Is there a MSRP anywhere on the page that might have been covered by the menus?

    1. Re:Opera chokes too by Hamster+Of+Death · · Score: 1

      Mozilla worked fine for me, but the price on the page is listed at $399.99, but they have no stock currently so you can't order one if you wanted to.

  35. Ethernet..for? by MrEnigma · · Score: 1

    It sounds like the ethernet port is only attached when the player is docked?

    So this basically means you could dock it in your living room next to the stereo..and update it via the network, and use it as a mp3 server, etc. This in itself would rock.

    --
    GeekWares - Buy and Download Today!
  36. FLAC Support Too by asv108 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the Rio Homepage

    Powerful tools include cross-fader, 5-band parametric equalizer, Ogg Vorbis and FLAC support, and a huge, backlit display capable of visualizations, animated menus, and 16 shades of gray.

    Now this is a reason to celebrate! I can get rid of my audiotron and my portable for one system that supports OGG and FLAC. FLAC support is huge for the thousands of people who download and share legal lossless music.

    1. Re:FLAC Support Too by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Fuck yes! Now if we could only get those etree hippies to stop using SHN.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:FLAC Support Too by asv108 · · Score: 1

      Yes I don't understand why people are still using SHN. I will be converting all my SHN's to FLAC's when I put down the $$$ for this device..

    3. Re:FLAC Support Too by greg_barton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now this is a reason to celebrate!

      I totally agree. I discovered FLAC about a month ago.

      I'm now in the process of re-ripping my entire CD collection.

      Even vs. MP3 at 320bps there's a huge difference.

      I can hear harmonics I couldn't hear before. I can hear the singer breathing. I can hear the clicking of loose piano keys.

      It makes the music come alive.

      I ain't never going back. :)

    4. Re:FLAC Support Too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want some of what you've been smoking...

    5. Re:FLAC Support Too by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      I want some of what you've been smoking...

      Here ya go...

  37. The eternal question by rolocroz · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does it play...oh, never mind.

    --

    I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

  38. Ethernet... by Steev · · Score: 1

    But is it 10 or 100 mbps ethernet? Everything USB device I plug in now seems to require more power than my hub can give it. If I could just copy the files over to it with ethernet the world would be a better place.

    1. Re:Ethernet... by pdh11 · · Score: 1
      But is it 10 or 100 mbps ethernet?

      10/100 auto-sensing. Even 100 is not as fast as USB2, though.

      Peter

    2. Re:Ethernet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been following the design and subsequent release of the Karma, and I'm quite happy to say that it is indeed 100mbit. I have no idea why they don't mention that one their website. That feature alone is a big selling point for me.

      -Johnny

  39. Is Ethernet a good idea? by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Maybe it's just me, and maybe I'm an idiot (there's always a good chance of that), but does using an Ethernet connection make any sense? Most computers used by typical home users only have one Ethernet port, and that's usually already used by their cable/DSL modem. Meanwhile, there are plenty of empty and/or shareable USB & Firewire ports available...

    --
    "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    1. Re:Is Ethernet a good idea? by dazk · · Score: 1

      Well, then simply use the USB2 connector. Where's the problem?

    2. Re:Is Ethernet a good idea? by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      I fear you may be an idiot.

      Most folk who use Ethernet use a hub or router, and have a home LAN. (Those who have cable modems and only 1 PC may very likely skip the hub and use USB.)

      Ethernet has the great big advantage that almost every PC has it at a good enough speed to use to transfer 20 GB of MP3s. Not everyone has Firewire, and most of us who have USB don't have USB2.

    3. Re:Is Ethernet a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of COURSE its a good idea. If you want an mp3 player that hooks up to USB, there's tons to pick from. If you want one that supports ethernet natively, the market is a LOT smaller. I'll proabably be buying two.

    4. Re:Is Ethernet a good idea? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So you just plug it into your hub, what could be easier? Everyone should have a hub, they're cheap and allow you to network your home. What would be nice is if you could switch interfaces by just switching out a card. Maybe have an ethernet card, FM card, USB card, SPDIF card, and line out card so everyone's happy. This way customers wouldn't be locked into a single set of features, and the company gets to sell more accessories.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:Is Ethernet a good idea? by Jack+Comics · · Score: 1

      Heh... "everyone should have one." Maybe in Wonderland, perhaps. But not here and now. Out of over 100 people I know from family, friends, and co-workers that have computers at home, I am the only one that has a hub. None of the rest do, as they only have one computer each. I think this would be the majority of homes with computers, as only a minority even know that hubs even exist.

      --
      "We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." - Oscar Wilde
    6. Re:Is Ethernet a good idea? by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      this is networked
      to be plugged into a hub

      not really unit cat5 pc
      unit cat5 hub cat5 pc
      cat5
      cable modem

      while leaving an alternative method for transfer is a good idea, this is catering to the have it in the other room people

  40. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by dazk · · Score: 1

    I tend to disagree. While many definately never heard of Ogg Vorbis, there probably won't be any ogg only player in the near future. For that reason, ogg products won't fail. But if there are players, buyers of these products might notice ogg and try it out.

  41. Good closed source, proprietary music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First... cool tune, man. I dig it.

    But what is Open Source about that music?! You've given us a link to the binary. Where's the source? Raw tracks? Midi data? Lyrics? Sheet music? Lead sheet? Chords? Anything?! Lame.

    1. Re:Good closed source, proprietary music by devphaeton · · Score: 0

      First off.... glad you liked it. :o)

      Okay, you've got me on a technicality. My bad. What kinda geek do i think i am? heh.

      I guess i should say Free (beer) Music?

      Though, the song is only 5 chords, it should be easy to reverse engineer ;)

      I shoulda posted the HiFi Mix.

      Man, i'm just blowing it all over today. /me hides

      --


      do() || do_not(); // try();
  42. Run, Slashdotters, run! by SandSpider · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quickly! To the Stores! Or to the Online Merchant of Your Choice!

    Since this is exactly what you've been calling for, I expect this thing to outsell the iPod in a week or two. I mean, Ogg Vorbis is the super format that's been the only thing keeping a legion of geeks from buying an MP3 player, right? Go hang a salami...I mean, hang Interface and Availablity, it's all about the Ogg.

    Mind you, if this doesn't sell like hotcakes, well, Vorbis won't have been quite the driving market force that you'd been preaching, will it? So you might want to by 5, just in case. Don't worry, if the market's there, you'll be able to sell them on ebay, sometimes for more than you'd bought them for. If the iPod is any benchmark, that is.

    =Brian

    --
    There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    1. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by Webz · · Score: 1

      I expect this thing to outsell the iPod in a week or two.

      You can't be serious. That's a completely unrealistic goal. Apple's iPod reeks of great design and simplicity. By the looks of it, that device doesn't.

      The mere aura of the iPod which I'm having great difficulty describing is a great marketing challenge to overcome for rival devices.

    2. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by SandSpider · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can't be serious.


      Well, exactly.

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
    3. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by sharkey · · Score: 1

      But can it acquire software from the demo Macs at CompUSA?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    4. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Apple's iPod reeks of great design and simplicity. By the looks of it, that device doesn't."

      Except that it's ligher, cheaper, smaller, plays OGG/FLAC, and has ethernet built in. Oh, and it's compatible with Linux too.

      Now, I agree that outselling the iPod is an unrealistic goal. But that has to do with the fact that the iPod has become a very strong brand, not the design of the device.

      Remember, Rio is a well known brand too.

    5. Re:Run, Slashdotters, run! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm you are arguing with an Apple zombie, you might as well advocate the benefits of not slamming your skull against the wall for all these types care. The iPod is unbeatable, no other possibility can or will be considered, even if that means burying their (admittedly small) heads in the sand.

  43. To gain acceptance it needs a better name. by Quarters · · Score: 1

    Marketing folks must hate putting "Ogg Vorbis" on things. It could easily be confused with onomatopoeia for vomitting.

    1. Re:To gain acceptance it needs a better name. by Anders · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Marketing folks must hate putting "Ogg Vorbis" on things.

      Do we need this one every time?

      Names do not matter. If they did, MP3 and MS-DOS would hardly have caught on. At least you can sort-of pronounce Ogg Vorbis, rather than having to spell it.

    2. Re:To gain acceptance it needs a better name. by Quarters · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? At least MP3 sounds edgey and 2/3rds of it rhyme. Ogg Vorbis could be a caveman, a mechanical part, a hungarian food dish. It's a horrible horrible name. Which, unfortunately, is an endemic problem with a lot of OSS.

    3. Re:To gain acceptance it needs a better name. by Omkar · · Score: 1

      Agreed. When I first saw the word, I thought it was some sort of game.

  44. AAC+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What's the point of using Ogg Vorbis when there is AAC+? AAC+ is better than Vorbis at all bitrates. Vorbis is not even good past 128kbps unless you're using the unofficial GT3b1 tuning. If you're going to spend so much money on a multimedia player, I don't think it would break the bank to buy Nero or Quicktime for AAC encoding. Vorbis doesn't even seem to be in development anymore, while AAC is being developed by many other companies.

    Vorbis can't compete.

    1. Re:AAC+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part of the point of using Vorbis is that it has no licensing/royalties issues.

      Guess what you get when you use AAC :P

  45. iRiver OGG update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In related news, iRiver gave this update on Vorbis support earlier this week: here

  46. Looks great, except for the web site by proxima · · Score: 1

    The player itself looks great, and just might be worthy of my money in the next year or so.

    The site, though, works like crap in mozilla. Can anyone post links to the menu-driven pages that we mozilla users can't access? I'd like to know if they're planning on making it OS-agnostic with the ethernet interface. Maybe a crappy web-based upload thing to be hacked into a little FTP server or something would be terrific.

    --
    "The universe seems neither benign nor hostile, merely indifferent." --Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Looks great, except for the web site by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1

      Those menus work fine with Konqueror 3.1.3.

      --
      This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  47. If only they knew html by icepick · · Score: 1

    Looks like this site does use correct html. Comes out all messed up in Mozilla.

    --
    You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.
  48. Now that we finally have an ogg media player by __aavhli5779 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about we finally get ogg support in digital video players, too?

    More and more video is being encoded as OGM (Ogg Media Stream) which usually involves xvid-encoded video and ogg-encoded audio; I can attest that the quality is superb but there is one clear downfall: at this moment, no DVD player or portable media device can play the format, thus requiring you to watch such encoded video on your computer.

    I look at this development as good progress towards finally getting something that supports both ogg and xvid out of the box.

    1. Re:Now that we finally have an ogg media player by NightEyez · · Score: 0

      one word -> MythTV

  49. Ethernet dock; USB 2.0 actually by steveha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    According to several articles I have read, such as the one on gizmodo.com, the Rio Karma will have USB 2.0 as its native interface; it will also come with a dock that will plug into an Ethernet network.

    If you can just use standard file server protocols (NFS or SMB, I don't care) to put files on the Karma, I will buy one. If you have to run some modified jukebox app to move the files, so it can wrap your files in DRM junk, I won't buy one.

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  50. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by iabervon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The consumer has already come to think of "mp3" as short for compressed digital music. This doesn't mean that Vorbis doesn't have a chance, though. Once the industry has accepted it, consumers will use it, even if they don't realize that their "mp3"s aren't actually mp3 at all. People will download and play Ogg files without knowing the technical details. People already don't know the difference between avi, wmv, and mpg, and really don't know that there are tons of different sorts of mpegs; there's no reason audio won't be the same, with nobody understanding or caring what format they're using, so long as it works, and always calling it "mp3" regardless of what it is.

  51. iRiver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people bought an iRiver device in the hope that it will support ogg soon. They made a statement about the codec a few days ago saying that ogg isn't really ready for emedded devices yet:

    http://www.iriver.com/company/news_view.asp?idx= 34 7

  52. Tradeoffs... by fedaykin42 · · Score: 1

    Ok, I'll admit up front that I don't own a portable lossy audio device. I do, however, use Vorbis on my PC and think it is great. But, does anyone else think that these things are insanly expensive? I mean, $399 for a portable audio player?! I'd be happy with an Ogg Vorbis player that's about the size of a pager that I can take to the gym or wear while cutting the lawn. I'm thinking like 1-4 hours of music, maybe use a CF card or just sync via USB into on-board flash or RAM. I'm also of the belief that as much as vorbis rocks the world, I won't be getting rid of my CDs or non-lossy versions of the recordings.

    Anybody else think this way, or am I in the minority?

    1. Re:Tradeoffs... by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Anybody else think this way, or am I in the minority?

      Well, I see your point but your criticism of this device as overpriced may be undeserved because you're considering using it only in a limited way, and it's capable of much more than playing an hour or two of music. For the applications you've described, a $100 device may be more appropriate, but this item is targeted at a different audience. We're talking about 40 GIGS of storage -- approximately 400 CD's worth of music (12 tracks each), or approx. 250 hours of sound!

      Imagine it as the center of your music listening experience -- a device you take with and plug into a home/office stereo or car audio system, or simply listen to it as a portable device. Plus, of course, it's a portable hard drive for moving data from one system to another.

  53. MP3 license payment? Yes. by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    Since the devices support MP3 (in addition to Ogg Vorbis), the manufacturer must pay a license for the MP3 decoder.

  54. Ogg Vorbis Power Consumption? by jetkust · · Score: 1

    Am i mistaking, or wouldn't playing Ogg Vorbis files instead of MP3 files result in decreased battery time since it may take more processor time to decode these files. Is this an issue to anyone?

    1. Re:Ogg Vorbis Power Consumption? by cbiffle · · Score: 2, Informative

      In a word, no.

      I play both regularly on my iPaq (200mhz ARM). Using the libmad decoder for MP3 and Nicholas Pitre's integerized Ogg library (NOT tremor), I see about 10% utilization for MP3, and 8-10% for Ogg. (I say 8-10 as conservative padding. In practice, believe it or no, Vorbis always hangs lower.)

      Keep in mind that the libvorbis libraries most folks use are a reference implementation. Once Vorbis is properly optimized, it's really quite light on the resources. These guys are probably using tremor, which I personally haven't tried, but I've heard people say it's even lighter than the Pitre decoder.

    2. Re:Ogg Vorbis Power Consumption? by pdh11 · · Score: 4, Informative
      These guys are probably using tremor

      Yup. It works out about the same CPU usage as MP3 for normal (64-128) bitrates, but seems to scale with bitrate a lot more than MP3 does; by the time you get to 256Kbits/s, Vorbis is really hard work.

      Peter

  55. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Steev · · Score: 4, Insightful

    MP3 is just another word in most people's vocabularies now. It's similar to "Kleenex vs. tissue" or "Q-Tip vs. cotton swab". When people say to go download an MP3, they really mean download some music in miscellanious format.

    I would sooner take an ogg than an mp3 anyday though ;)

  56. W3C? by heli0 · · Score: 1

    Does this link: http://www.digitalnetworksna.com/shop/_templates/i tem_main_Rio.asp?model=220&cat=53 display properly for anyone usng Mozilla? I am using 1.5A and the menus(which don't work) are displayed on top of the specs which run off the window.

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:W3C? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. I'm using 1.4

    2. Re:W3C? by MikeCapone · · Score: 1

      Same here with Firebird 0.6 Time to email the webmaster, I suppose.

  57. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Synn · · Score: 1

    Products playing for ogg won't "fail", because they can also play mp3 and any other format the designer wants to add.

    The unwashed masses can download low quality mp3's all they want. I prefer to rip ogg's off my cds and won't buy a player that won't play them.

    Successful devices will be any two of: cheap, flexible, or high quality.

  58. Re:A good MP3 player is more than technical gimmic by uradu · · Score: 1

    I also have two Volts (90 and 150), and while they work quite well with MP3 CDs (esp. after flashing with the iRiver f/w), they're very temperamental with Audio CDs. Which I find strange, I would expect a dinky little gadget like that to choke on a file system sooner than on an established CD format that's been around for twenty years. Still, since you can get the 150 for $35 now, they're still worth the money. Of course, the Riot I got for $130 will also hopefully be worth the money :-)

  59. Ethernet slow? by ryan76 · · Score: 1

    Isn't ethernet going to be substantially slower than firewire or USB?

    --
    http://threetechguys.info Come, discuss Technology. Got a technology question? Come ask!
  60. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How many people talk about ogg sharing, the same way they talk about mp3 sharing?
    How many people talk about CD sharing? Almost none. Therefore, the market for CD players is (and has always been) low. (Same for tapes and vinyl: There were never any markets for players of those media either.)

    Er.. waitaminute. I better go back and check my logic.

  61. Why oh why is base 2 so hard??? by tundog · · Score: 1

    Its 20GB* drive can carry over 5,000 songs ...
    *1 GB equals 1,000,000,000 bytes


    Why do people have such a hard time wraping their heads around the fack that 1GB = 1,073,741,824 bytes?

    Let's review:

    1GB = 1024 MB = 1024 * 1024 KB = 1024 * 1024 *1024 bytes

    OR

    2^30 = 2^10 * 2^20 = 2^10 * 2^10 * 2^10

    This lesson was brought to you today by the letters P H B

    --
    All your base are belong to us!
    1. Re:Why oh why is base 2 so hard??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't blame them. If the hard drive manufacturers got it right in the first place it would all be so much easier. But hard drive manufacturers use the 1GB = 1x10^9 definition to start with.

      Maybe they should re-market the Karmas as 18.62GB and 37.25GB units respectively. Doesn't have quite the same ring to it, does it?

      And that wouldn't exactly make price comparisons with any other manufacturers easy - Apple, Creative and Neuros all use the drive manufacturers definitions too. Why should Rio be expected to get it right at the expense of sales?

      At least they are being honest and letting people know that the definition isn't strictly correct. I bet that Apple etc. don't.

    2. Re:Why oh why is base 2 so hard??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the "G" in front of GB stands for giga, which in every context except for the computer storage means a billion (such as GHz, which is 10^9 Hz - not 2^30 Hz, or GW, or ... )

      It's true that since files tend to be in binary it's appropriate to measure storage in binary, however what i'm trying to point out is that it's not so far off to say that 1 GB since it is us who's changin the definition of a word that predates computers.

    3. Re:Why oh why is base 2 so hard??? by valkraider · · Score: 1

      At least they are being honest and letting people know that the definition isn't strictly correct. I bet that Apple etc. don't.

      Apple is honest, despite what your bias would have you believe. iPod Specs says right there under "Storage":"10GB(2) 15GB(2) 30GB(2)".

      Look to the bottom and you will see: "(2) 1GB = 1 billion bytes; actual formatted capacity less."

      Seems honest enough to me.

    4. Re:Why oh why is base 2 so hard??? by splatbang · · Score: 1
      Because 1GB = 1,000,000,000 bytes, according to SI prefixes. Rather, 1GiB = 1,073,741,824 bytes.

      Check it out here: http://www.cofc.edu/~frysingj/binprefixes.html

      This lesson was brough to you today by the letters S, I and it's metric dammit!

  62. Palm devices play Oggs by Steev · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been listening to ogg vorbis files for months now using my Palm Zire 71 and Aeroplayer. I got myself a 256 Meg SD card and I was off to the races.

  63. Ok, so it has ethernet, but... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

    Okay -- admittedly, ethernet support is a very good thing, but IMO that just means it has a useful interconnect system available.

    The more important question IMO is what protocols does it support over the ethernet connection? NetBIOS/NetBEUI? TCP/IP? Some custom protocol? If TCP/IP, does it support NFS? FTP? NetBIOS over TCP/IP? Something else?

    The poorly designed/formatted website doesn't give much information in this regard. I'm assuming it's TCP/IP based, but even then, you need something that will allow you to transfer files to it.

    Being NFS based would be ideal here. Being able to mount it from any of my OS/2 or Linux boxes as a drive would be perfect. NetBIOS/NetBEUI/etc. would be of secondary usefulness -- I don't run any of these protocols (as I don't need to -- they add overhead and don't do anything NFS and lpr/lpd don't), but have them available on all my systems. If they're FTP based, well at least NetDrive allows me to treat them as filesystem mounts. If they're using some "custom" protocol that only works with their Windows-based client software, then no thanks.

    Anyone know?

    Yaz.

  64. Nobody uses Ogg Vorbis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1 it has a stupid name

    #2 it offers very little benefit over MP3's

    #3 MP3 already has wide-spread support

    #4 Plain and simple, nobody fucking cares.

  65. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by bogado · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This makes me remember, in the early days of the internet when the people with internet access were lucky and most geeks used BBS system. The clueless people here in brasil would call any image of gif. There were BBS with a gif download dir, usualy filled with porn jpegs.

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  66. Run on linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is says that windows is required. Is this true, or can we linux people rig it with dd or something?

  67. OGG support by John+the+Kiwi · · Score: 1

    It's great to see more companies supporting OGG. I use it exclusively for all my CDs and the sound quality is excellent, not to mention the open source (read spyware free) software apps that make for easy audio extraction.

    John the Kiwi

  68. You knew this was coming... by markv242 · · Score: 1

    "It's worthless to me unless it plays MP3."

  69. No WiFi - and why the RIAA will object by JonTurner · · Score: 1

    >>In a pocket-sized box, I'd be looking for Wi-Fi rather than a cabled connection.

    And in short order, you'd be looking for an electrical outlet to recharge it. The power demands of wifi considered with the size limitations of the device makes the idea of a pocket-sized wifi mp3 player impractical for all but short durations.

    The idea is interesting, though allow me to shift into Devil's Advocate role for a moment... wouldn't this device, if it transmits music via Wifi, effectively be a low power radio station? After all, it's broadcasting music, and that requires an FCC license and permission from the "intellectual" property owner, which could give the RIAA an excuse to demand commercial broadcast licenses (e.g. many thousands of $$s) per device.

    1. Re:No WiFi - and why the RIAA will object by swb · · Score: 1

      It's broadcasting on the rf spectrum, but wouldn't it be *unicasting* on the actual data layer? Unless of course you were multicasting on the data layer, but that functionality likely wouldn't be built in.

  70. That's nice, but by AEton · · Score: 1

    if they're going to put OGG Vorbis reading support in some of their products, I really wish they'd consider their older lines too. My RioVolt SP250 is attractive because it plays MP3 and WMA CD's, but it would be totally killer kick-arse if it also played OGG CD's. They already have the code for playing it on a hard drive-based system--how hard could it be to port that and make one last upgrade to the SP250 firmware? Until I see Rio supporting older hardware (and, in the case of my RioVolt, still among the best in terms of CD music file play-ability), I'm not sure I want to be buying any of their new hardware.

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
  71. Umm.... by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    I see it says Ogg/Flac...anyone know if it still has MP3 support or does it just support those formats....and can anyone point to documentation that says it supports Ogg, and MP3....

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    1. Re:Umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. MP3, Ogg and Flac.

  72. roflMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KARMA!!! thats what they call it?? rofl!
    hahahahahahahahahahaha....
    talk about the most abused sanskrit words.

  73. FLAC support by ectospasm · · Score: 1

    Not only does it have Ogg Vorbis support, it has FLAC support too. I'm definitely considering this now...

    --


    We are the music makers. We are the dreamers of the dreams.
  74. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Yort · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The consumer has already come to think of "mp3" as short for compressed digital music.

    Exactly. If the industry supports it, it stands a good chance to get used because people don't really care for the most part. All they care about is that when they click on the link, it plays in their player of choice. Or that if they look up download a Dave Matthews Band song from Kazaa, it plays in their portable player.

    Now that many of the major PC-players and portable players are supporting Ogg, it won't matter if a site/person/whoever is offering something in MP3, WMA, AAC, Ogg - to the end user, if it works, it's great.

    And hey, if this song over here with the .ogg (as if they ever see 3-letter extensions in Windoze) sounds better than the one with .mp3, I'll go with that one. And if I can fit 35 songs from this place that has "Oggs" compared to 30 from this other place onto my 128MB player...

    I picked up a Neuros and am loving it. Still needs some work, but they seem to be pretty connected to their user community, which is nice.

  75. moron the lunatic fringe .conspiracIE theorists.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lament.

    including those of us whoare subjected to va lairIE's whoreabully infactdead, pateNTdead, PostBlock(tm) devise, which is a product of the hedgemonIEd SourceForgerIE(tm). we don't think robbIE had a clue about what he was signing in blood for.

    SAN JOSE, Calif. (AP) -- In an Aug. 7 story about a challenge by the SCO Group to the Linux operating system's royalty-free status, The Associated Press reported erroneously that Microsoft Corp. was among the vendors of Linux-based servers.

    While Microsoft recently purchased a license from SCO for Linux copies it owns (in GLARING 50 pt.), the software giant (fauxking morons) does not sell the operating system.--

    what a hoot

    details @ trustworthycomputing.com(edyroutine)

    back on task.

    we're editing this soon.

    about va lairIE/robbIE et AL touting/shilling for their corepirate nazi life0cide sponsors, whilst avoiding anything/everything that really matters

    this fauxking avoidance of the planet/population rescue project (previously unknown as the oil for babies program), & failing to fess up on the stock markup swindles, is disheartening, to say the leased, robbIE. you sure spouted off A LOT before you became won of those phonIE Godless payper liesense stock markup billyonerrors. same with va lairIE, & his whoreabull patentdead PostBlock(tm)/SourceForgerIE kode stealing/censoring devices. that's ok dough, as it's not yOUR worst problem.

    no matter. back on task.

    as to the free unlimited energy plan, as the lights come up, more&more folks will stop being misled into sucking up more&more of the infant killing barrolls of crudeness, & learn that it's more than ok to use newclear power generated by natural (hydro, solar, etc...). of course more information about not wasting anything/behaving less frivolously is bound to show up, here&there.

    cyphering how many babies it costs for a barroll of crudeness, we've decided to cut back, a lot, on wasteful things like giving monIE to felons, to help them destroy the planet/population.

    no matter. the #1 task is planet/population rescue. the lights are coming up. we're in crisis mode. you can help.

    the unlimited power (such as has never been seen before) is freely available to all, with the possible exception of the aforementioned walking dead.

    consult with/trust in yOUR creator. more breathing. vote with yOUR wallet. seek others of non-aggressive intentions/behaviours. that's the spirit, moving you.

    pay no heed to the greed/fear based walking dead.

    each harmed innocent carries with it a bad toll. it will be repaid by you/us. the Godless felons will not be available to make reparations.

    pay attention. that's definitely affordable, plus you might develop skills which could prevent you from being misled any further by phonIE ?pr? ?firm? generated misinformation.

    good work so far. there's still much to be done. see you there. tell 'em robbIE.

    the europeeons are laughing/crying at/for US in sympathy/disgust, as we fall/jump into the daze of the georgewellian corepirate nazi life0cide, whilst criticizing their ip gangsters, which are also members of the walking dead.

  76. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by quantaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The answer to this question is irrelevant. The real question is "Is Ogg Vorbis gaining consumer acceptance?" It doesn't matter if the music industry thinks Ogg Vorbis is good, as long as consumers aren't using it.

    You would think that is how it should work but (un?)fortunately it doesn't. If a ogg is going to be accepted by the consumer that means the industry has to support it first because they control the vast majority of the infrastructure used to play music. Consumers other than us geeks aren't going to use ogg unless the big media players allow you to play it and rip to it and it becomes available in download services. I can say I never even heard of ACC until the Apple Music Store. Industry leads and the consumers may or may not choose to follow, that's how it works.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  77. Slashdot Comment: by powerlord · · Score: 1
    So, all of us who want them would be ...

    Karma Hogs

    :D

    --
    This space for rent. All reasonable inquiries will be entertained at proprietors discretion.
    1. Re:Slashdot Comment: by mr_luc · · Score: 1

      And the poorer gadget geeks that are willing to trade sexual favors for one of these would be . . .

      Karma Whores

      And if it arrived broken, we would have Bad Karma. And soon people will have witty, ironic sigs saying things like

      "Karma: $399.99" or

      "Karma: a fine product" or

      "Karma: Poor, mostly due to purchasing a Karma" or

      "Karma: 20GB, networkable!" or
      "Karma: Broken (under warranty)".

      ^^ I claim prior art on those.

    2. Re:Slashdot Comment: by jx100 · · Score: 1

      "Karma: chameleon, due mostly to the replacement of casing to color-changing material"

  78. Context Sensitive Meaning by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The label of being "hackable" makes the device more desirable for a lot of us.

    "Hackable"

    A definite good thing in this forum, where the difference between a hacker and a cracker is appreciated. And someone who deliberately makes hardware that is flexible is appreciated, not scorned.

    But in the world at large, hackable is regarded as a negative attribute, something that allows vague unknown bad people to do bad things to MyComputer.

    It's sad that there is such a large gap in understanding what "hackable" means between the inside expert press and the world at large.

    Someone with a loud voice ought to educate the masses with some kind of analogy to cars with locked hoods being unhackable.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
    1. Re:Context Sensitive Meaning by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 1

      Someone with a loud voice ought to educate the masses with some kind of analogy to cars with locked hoods being unhackable.

      That reminds me of the motorcycle industry some years ago. American motorcyclists were all seen as the rough riding biker with a spiked leather jacket that seems stereotypical of bikers. Motorcycle sales were way down across the country, and nothing seemed to be able to lift them. People saw bikers as thugs, and didn't want to associate themselves with that image. That changed when Honda entered the scene and started a massive publicity campaign. You can still spot their slogan if you know what you're looking for: "You Meet the Nicest People on a Honda." It went a very long way towards changing the image of motorcyclists from thug bikers to average joes. Today you see a lot of executives, doctors, and lawyers with nice, expensive motorcycles, and people no longer think of your average motorcyclist as that thug.

      --
      Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
    2. Re:Context Sensitive Meaning by pdh11 · · Score: 1
      "Hackable"

      A definite good thing in this forum

      I guess part of why it grates slightly to hear the car-player described as "hackable" is that it's like a "parkable" car or a "openable" door. It ought not to take extra words to explain that a gadget hasn't been made incapable of doing some of the things it's clearly capable of. It ought to take extra words to explain when it has.

      Peter

    3. Re:Context Sensitive Meaning by ediron2 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm in the midst of cowriting a report today, and one of the other authors tweaked that nerve by misusing 'Hacker'. My first thought (find & give author my 'come-to-jesus' speech) evaporated quickly because I know he knows the proper meaning. Fact is, he used it because it's what lay people perceive as the word's meaning. I almost never follow up on improper use of the term any more.

      But my second thought was that we're in part to blame. No doctor, lawyer, engineer, dentist, vet, activist, politician, soldier, plumber, electrician, or telephone-handset-sanitizer in the world would let lay people corrupt their jargon. My dentist still calls that shit on my teeth calculus, despite my knowing he had to take a couple semesters of that math subject to get into grad school to become a dentist. My lawyer doesn't refer to his peers as sharks and money-grubbin' ambulance chasers. He says "Counsellor". So, I'm officially going to go back to tilting at windmills. A cracker, an intruder, an assailant of networks... but never a Hacker. I'm a Hacker. A damn good one. Don't use the term unless you know what it means!

      Oh, and I'm puttin' my white hat away. Never liked the damn thing...

      ob-sig: yeah yeah yeah, Off-topic, but at least I knew enough to click the 'no bonus' boxes.

  79. But sir by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You keep forgetting to tell us how we can subscribe to your newsletter!

  80. Chicken and egg... by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Industry doesn't produce what the consumers don't want. Consumers don't demand music they can't play (on their MP3-capable devices). Both need to happen to make ogg big.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Chicken and egg... by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      If that were truly the case, there would never be any innovation. But some consumers (me) demand (and rip) to new formats before they're completely useful, and some companies create products before there's a huge demand.

      When I chose Vorbis, the things that mattered to me were that Linux could play it, it had good quality, and it was open. I didn't need portable support. Now, I'd kinda like a portable, but I won't buy one that doesn't support Ogg. A demand was created. When Neuros, Rio, PhatNoise, et al chose to add Vorbis support to their players, it wasn't because of a huge demand. But there was enough demand, and it wasn't being satisfied, and it wasn't that expensive to add support (thanks to Tremor). But having a few portables enables the format to become more widespread, and a more widespread format creates more demand for portables that support it, which enables still more Vorbis users, and so on.

  81. Isn't it ironic... by switcha · · Score: 1
    So, you can get a Loaded player, but you can't Get Loaded.

    ...don't you think?

    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  82. iRiver too by GarfBond · · Score: 2, Informative
    Visiting the site in Mozilla breaks (firebird nightly and moz1.4), but Opera 7.11 on Win seems to work just fine, for those of you refusing to hit up IE.

    For what it's worth, iRiver (the same people who make the original RioVolt line and the current SlimX and flashplayer things you find at Bestbuy) just made a news release detailing their Ogg efforts. http://www.iriver.com/company/news_view.asp?idx=34 7

    Essentially what they're saying is that Tremor is too big for their embedded devices (read: CD players and flash players). I suppose this can be an excusable claim, depending on the device. However, I'm really disappointed their hard drive doesn't include Ogg support, as a hard drive is a bigger and heaver item, and it shouldn't hurt too much for them to include Ogg support on the ROM.

    1. Re:iRiver too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify, the Rio product page doesn't work in Mozilla (as many have already noticed) but does work in Opera. all the iRiver pages work fine in Mozilla.

  83. Re:Xbox = ultimate media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    it r0X0rs even more when I want to take my xbox with me on a long trip in the car, or when I want to go for a run.

    oh wait... no it doesn't.

    TY, now STFU.

  84. ThinkPad by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Informative

    an old Thinkpad makes a great networked Ogg Vorbis player and second hand it costs less than this toy, but it is a wee lil'bit bigger...

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  85. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by bogie · · Score: 1

    "When people say to go download an MP3, they really mean download some music in miscellanious format."

    Actually I'd disagree. If they are in fact going online to download some music chances are its going to be MP3 and not some other format.

    From a consumer perspective(not that most people have even heard of ogg) Ogg is still a solution in short of a problem.

    From an IP point of view I agree and think that Ogg is great. It's also cool to see so many game designers switching to Ogg for their games. At the same time personally I have absolutely no use for Ogg.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  86. Rio Receiver by ttyp0 · · Score: 1
    I was thinking about the Rio Receiver, but I couldn't remember the name. What happened to it? Is it still around, or was it a flop? I saw them for $300 when they came out a couple years ago, and was going to wait until they went down in price.

    Anti SCO T-Shirt. $1 donated to OSI Fund on each shirt.

  87. SCREW Rio by msaulters · · Score: 1

    Two years ago, I bought a Rio 600 new for ~$180.
    The device was crippled, can only write, can't read files, must use their application to transfer files, no external power source, LOW battery life (batteries drain even when powered off). Not only that, but the promised 320MB memory add-on never saw the light of day.

    Now, they not only have stopped selling, but also supporting the things. The application doesn't work under Windows 2K, you must use RealOne (which I despise), and which doesn't allow (who knows why?) you to transfer WMA files to the device. It's firmware-upgradeable, and otherwise a spiffy device, so NO REASON they couldn't provide updates, or at least source code so some project could take it over, provide support for Ogg, etc.

    It will be a cool day in heck before I consider the purchase of any more Rio products. I'd like to be comfortable that products I purchase (especially for a premium price) will be usable more than six months down the road.

    --
    These people looked deep into my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    1. Re:SCREW Rio by altman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Download rio music manager 1.90 from www.rioaudio.com - and delete all your old drivers (ideally, the registry keys too). RMM 1.90 does work with 2k/XP and is rather a lot more stable than the old software, as this stuff was written from scratch for the S-series players - but we also added support for legacy players though it doesn't get shouted about much. It'll do WMA transfers no problem too.

      No reason not to provide source, etc? Licensing agreements and a $5k toolchain are probably enough of a disincentive for source release for the old Rio players.

      The 600 came from the US development office, which is no more. The UK office (ex-empeg) now does all the rio stuff; there was also a lot of turmoil surrounding sonicblue going away, so these two combine into the old stuff being slightly more orphaned than might otherwise be the case - but try getting support for a (say) 2 year old parallel port scanner; same deal...

  88. iPod + Ogg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone tell me why Apple has avoided the Ogg codec on the iPods w/iTunes? It would seem like common sense to deploy this in the next firmware/software update to keep up with the Joneses.

    1. Re:iPod + Ogg by valkraider · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't get along with the Joneses. Actually, that is putting it politely. They flat out hate eachother. Ever since that unfortunate incident back in aught 1... It's been downhill ever since.

  89. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 1

    Right, because those of us that care enough about sound quality to use Ogg just rip the CD.

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
  90. Ethernet interface, but can't play internet radio by casper_bonk · · Score: 1

    What I'd love to see is a device this small that can play internet radio, and output through RCA output. Anyone know a device like this?

    --
    -- Casper Bonk.
  91. Your answer... by tuffy · · Score: 1

    ...here. It features a web server and Java applet for tune addition (along with other methods) - looks extremely cool.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    1. Re:Your answer... by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      It features a web server and Java applet for tune addition (along with other methods) - looks extremely cool.

      If it doesn't act like a hard drive through standard protocols (NFS, NetBIOS/NetBEUI), then IMO it looks quite a bit less cool.

      I want to be able to plug it in and use it as a big old hard drive. In that way it could serve as not only a player, but when connected as the core MP3/Ogg repository on my home network. There would no longer be any need to keep seperate copies of such things on the actual computers themselves -- if I'm ripping CDs, I could use whatever encoding software I want to and let it write directly to the mount point. If I want to playback on my PC, just plug in the player, mount it, and stream the data across the network.

      IMO, that's quite a bit more cool than having to go through a web interface to move files back and forth.

      Yaz.

  92. This is great, now I need Kenwood to catch on! by nvrrobx · · Score: 1

    The majority of my music listening time is spent between work and my commute. Listening to Ogg Vorbis files at work is easy, but once Kenwood (or another equally good car stereo manufacturer) gets on the Ogg bandwagon, I'll be more than happy to re-encode all my CDs to Ogg instead of MP3. Until I have a car CD player, I can't switch.

    And no, an FM modulator, casette adapter or aux input thing is not acceptable in the car... People are dangerous enough using their cell phones in the car, can you picture straining to see the display on your iPod or something?!

    1. Re:This is great, now I need Kenwood to catch on! by Josh+Coalson · · Score: 2, Informative
      The majority of my music listening time is spent between work and my commute. Listening to Ogg Vorbis files at work is easy, but once Kenwood (or another equally good car stereo manufacturer) gets on the Ogg bandwagon, I'll be more than happy to re-encode all my CDs to Ogg instead of MP3. Until I have a car CD player, I can't switch.

      Kenwood makes the MusicKeg, a rebranded Phatbox, which plays FLAC and I believe you can get firmware from PhatNoise to play Vorbis also. They are still working on optimizations to Tremor to play the highest quality levels smoothly.

      Josh

    2. Re:This is great, now I need Kenwood to catch on! by valkraider · · Score: 1

      is spent between work and my commute

      Company has a large parking lot that fills up fast, eh?

  93. source code? by Doppler00 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the least a company who implements the Ogg Vorbis protocol should do is donate some small percentage of profits from each sale to xiph.org to support continued development. Not that they have to (do to it being patent and royalty free) but it would be a nice gesture.

    Is Rio required by the Ogg Vorbis license agreement to release the microcode they used to implement this protocol? It would be interesting to see what kind of optimizations they used such as special DSP instructions.

    1. Re:source code? by pdh11 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Is Rio required by the Ogg Vorbis license agreement to release the microcode they used to implement this protocol?

      No, it's BSD-licensed.

      It would be interesting to see what kind of optimizations they used such as special DSP instructions.

      Actually we use the Tremor (integerised) Vorbis library almost completely stock -- it already came with optimisations for ARM. The only thing we've really had to take a hitting thing to is its memory allocation.

      Peter

  94. Re:A good MP3 player is more than technical gimmic by Trollificus · · Score: 1
    Wow, I've never had experience like that with my Riovolt. I've had mine since it was first released to the market and have had no problems with it whatsoever. Load times are extremely fast, and I've never had an mp3 or wma file skip. It goes pretty easy on batteries as well. A new pair of AA Energizers would last a 7 hour trip on the road when I drove up to PEI a few years ago.

    Maybe you were unfortunate enough to get a few duds, or the firmware needs to be updated(or maybe updating was the problem).
    I'm curious to know which firmware version you're running.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  95. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The answer to this question is irrelevant.

    No it's not. The manufacturers are the ones who (I think) will be mostly responsible for introducing Ogg to the masses. The reason is that the money they don't have to pay to Fraunhofer for the MP3 license goes right in their pockets. If they can sell a $200 music player that does everything in Ogg rather than MP3, they can save themselves $4 a pop (or whatever) on every unit sold. Do you think Diamond would be putting Vorbis playback in this new unit if it wasn't free?

    Of course, this player does MP3 too, so they are paying anyway. But in a year or so I think we may start seeing Vorbis-only players.

  96. Pshhh... by BMonger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Don't even tempt me until there's something that can play WAV.

    1. Re:Pshhh... by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Well, WMA lossless is backwards compatible with standard WMA as far as playing in Windows Media Player goes, so maybe the Karma will be able to handle WMA lossless to make up for a lack of WAV support.

    2. Re:Pshhh... by Josh+Coalson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't even tempt me until there's something that can play WAV.

      Why? It can play FLAC, which is lossless.

      Josh

    3. Re:Pshhh... by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Nevermind, the Karma supports FLAC. No reason to use WAV over FLAC when FLAC is lossless and typically results in compression factors of 1.5-3x.

    4. Re:Pshhh... by altman · · Score: 1

      It can play WAVs, we just don't shout about it as you'd be silly not to use FLACs given they're identical quality but take up less hard disk space.

  97. And you my good man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are exactly the reason why the mainstream still doesn't care about Linux. Who wants to use an OS whose current core userbase consists of drooling mouth-breathers like you?

  98. Time to feed the trolls... by SoSueMe · · Score: 1

    That whole IE arguement is for web babies and marketeers; Flash web designers and PHB's; the ignorant and the uncaring.
    Many people who don't use IE use assistive devices and non-grafics browsers.
    Do you think a potential customer who is visually impaired might be interested in an audio player?
    It's not like their primary interface with the world is through auditory perception, now is it?

    Go get some real life experience and grow up. Then you might have something to say that is worth listening to.

  99. Neuros is huge by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    It's as big as a brick!

  100. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by abdulla · · Score: 1

    Well what you need to do is inform the people... or just be a cheeky bastard like me and set up your friend's computer to rip to ogg, they all have Winamp icons so she doesn't care as long as they play.

  101. Re: ...or the console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Firstly, you don't need X to play audio files. Mplayer is a command line player.

    Secondly, you can even watch movies on the console, using aalib (ascii-art rendering, I kid you not!). Not very useful, except as a last resort, though.

  102. To flog a dead horse.... by meowsqueak · · Score: 1

    So is that actually usb 1.0 or 1.1 renamed as usb 2.0 (usb full speed) or usb high speed incorrectly labelled as usb 2.0?

    I realise this sort of thing has been debated to death, but the Rio Karma is meant to be a new product, so why haven't they adopted the new USB nomenclature (which, in my opinion, is far less confusing than the old system now that it exists. However, in turn, its existence has made the old system more confusing. Can't win 'em all)?

    I guess we just need some way of speaking in symbols:

    "The protocol formerly known as USB 2.0 provides fast transfers while the included docking station also adds drop-in charging..."

    1. Re:To flog a dead horse.... by pdh11 · · Score: 3, Informative
      So is that actually usb 1.0 or 1.1 renamed as usb 2.0 (usb full speed) or usb high speed incorrectly labelled as usb 2.0?

      Without necessarily wishing to express an opinion on the nitwits who thought that that renaming was a good idea, Karma supports the 480Mbits/s variety of USB, or, as I'm tempted to call it, proper USB2. (That is, the wire speed is 480Mbits/s; you don't get the whole 60Mbytes/s in practice as that's more than the head rate of the winchester.)

      Peter

  103. Their Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course their website works with neither Mozilla nor Safari, so tell me again: Why should I buy their stuff?

  104. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Cyno · · Score: 1

    The cool thing about ogg, and most technology today, is you don't need industry acceptance to use it today. I set my dad down with a Linux box, grip, ogg and his CD collection last year and wrote a quick script so he can burn his own mix CDs directly from ogg files. Its not perfect, but he's very happy with it.

    This year I get to show him how to do the same thing with dvdrip, ogm and his DVD collection.

    In a way I feel more secure knowing most people still use mp3s and avis. He won't have any problems using these formats, but he won't have to deal with the typical industry BS.

    Anyone remember DAT? How about Beta-Max? How do you think they are related?

    I don't need anyone who wants to take technology away from me or force DRM, encryption, macrovision, copyrights, patents and royalties down my throat. And neither does my dad.

  105. how long would it take by lostinchicago · · Score: 1

    how long would it take to convert 11,000 mp3's to ogg vorbis?

  106. iPod comparison by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a specification comparison with an equivalently priced (both at $399) iPod... info from dapreview, an excellent respository of specs of hdd audio players which reported on the Karma aka "Pearl" months ago.

    iPod
    Capacity: 15GB
    Weight: 5.6 ounces
    Formats: MP3 AAC AIFF WAV
    Interfaces: Firewire 400
    Battery Life: "Over 8 hours"
    Extras: Games, Contacts, Calendar, Alarm, Sleep Timer, Clock, "20 equalizer settings"
    LCD: 160x128 backlit

    Karma
    Capacity: 20GB
    Weight: 5.5 ounces
    Formats: MP3 WMA OGG FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec making WAV not needed)
    Interfaces: USB 2 and Ethernet
    Battery Life: 15 hours
    Extras: Dynamic playlists, Dual RCA Line-Outs, 5 band equalizer
    LCD: 160x128 backlit

    Seems like if you want purely a music player that is conveniently-sized, supports OGG and has 25% more capacity than the iPod for the same price, the Karma is the way to go. The iPod's perks are tempting though, if you want more than just a music player.

    1. Re:iPod comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The current 15GB iPod is able to use USB 2.0 with an adapter cable and also has a line out in the dock.

      You also forgot the most important aspect of a portable music player... how it sounds. The iPod has been well-regarded by audiophiles and produces very clean signals. In fact, it drives my Sennheiser HD580s extremely well without an external headphone amp.

      Personally, the Karma looks very promising, but I'll wait until the reviews are in and I have an opportunity to hear one before replacing my iPod with one.

    2. Re:iPod comparison by poity · · Score: 1

      That's 33% more, which makes it even sweeter!

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    3. Re:iPod comparison by altman · · Score: 1

      The Karma uses the same DAC/Headphone amp as the iPod (Wolfson Audio) hence has the same 30+30mW output and nice clean sound.

    4. Re:iPod comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, so it has a larger hard drive, equivalent sound quality and supports more and better sound formats. So what? The iPod is made by Apple, and I will just wait for the iPod 2 which will probably kick this peice of shit "Rio" things ass. Anything made by Apple is better. No ifs, ands or butts.

    5. Re:iPod comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      More than just a music player?
      • a paperweight
      • a fashion statement
      • mugger bait
      Looks like the Rio is a match for the Ipod in all those categories. What else is there?
    6. Re:iPod comparison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since we're already on the 3rd-gen iPod, where's your butt been?

  107. A few points... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    They have broadcast adapters. Google Also, i dont notice any major battery life loss on my laptop with my 802.11g card running, it cant suck that much power. With hard drive MP3 players getting 10 hours of battery life and the flash ones even more its not much of an issue. I cant think of any situation where i use my mp3 player for longer than its battery life when i'm not near an outlet.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:A few points... by cens0r · · Score: 1

      big difference between your laptop and a handheld mp3 player. First, look at the difference in battery size. Second, look at all the other stuff your laptop is running (HD, CDROM, Monitor, wifi, CPU, etc). A better example would be to think about a palm or windows CE device and how much power wifi suck on those.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  108. FLAC by Jaegs · · Score: 1

    For those of you who do not know what FLAC (Free Lossless Audio Codec) is, here's the link to the SourceForge page: http://flac.sourceforge.net/

  109. No Line Out?!? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    How does it not have a line out? Your not gonna find a portable player with RCA jacks, but does it not even have a headphone jack? My archos player has a headphone jack and a line out jack thats a standard 1/8" just at a fixed volume. Just use a 1/8" to RCA cable.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:No Line Out?!? by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      Headphone, yes, but not line out. But, since it has the FM transmitter, this isn't a big deal. The main thing I'm going for is to have it play through my car stereo.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    2. Re:No Line Out?!? by NomNet · · Score: 1
      > Headphone, yes, but not line out. But, since it has the FM transmitter, this isn't a big deal. The main thing I'm going for is to have it play through my car stereo.

      You seem to be unaware that the Headphone-out and a Line-out are exactly the same !

      Plug the Headphone socket into the Line-In on your stereo. Set the volume on the player appropriately, and voila.

    3. Re:No Line Out?!? by bytesmythe · · Score: 1

      They aren't quite the same, as the headphone sends the signal through an amp first.

      Although the problem I'm having shouldn't be related to that. I imagine my car stereo just isn't installed correctly. If I try to play things from the aux input jack, I hear a lot of weird extra noise that is apparently being picked up from under the hood.

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    4. Re:No Line Out?!? by NomNet · · Score: 1
      > They aren't quite the same, as the headphone sends the signal through an amp first.

      Lower the volume on the player, so the headphone output level matches a normal line-out level.

      > Although the problem I'm having shouldn't be related to that. I imagine my car stereo just isn't installed correctly. If I try to play things from the aux input jack, I hear a lot of weird extra noise that is apparently being picked up from under the hood.

      You need a "Ground Loop Isolator" - your local Car Audio store will sell you one for $10

  110. Other Vorbis players by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

    The Karma is very cool, and reading about it made my day. It's showing that Vorbis is gaining support. I guess this is another portable Vorbis player to add to the list.

  111. Remote control? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    I'm having trouble accessing the web site... Is this thing capable of being operated via remote control? I'd *love* to hook one of these up to my entertainment center. It'd also be nice to have one in my car with an 802.11g uplink. I'd rather use this unit in both cases instead of something in a home audio component or car stereo form-factor, because this seems to me would be more useful for the future.

  112. Hugof, Karma Developer has spoken. by thadk-- · · Score: 1

    One of the prime developers for this device has been talking about it in depth for a while over on the MP3.com forums.

    The website does poorly reflect linux compatibility. According to Hugo the player sports a Java (and native Windows) interface via the Ethernet. It uses the same codebase as the Rio Reciever. It has a somewhat proprietary filesystem (for "stability" reasons) so it might be hard to pull the trick iPod uses like--using them as a portable hard disk.

    Can't wait for the 40gb version.

    One thing I'm sort of bothered about is the fact that 20gb = 20,000,000,000bytes. rather than 1000x1024x1024 or 1024x1024x1024. I guess DVDs are advertised with a similiarly quirked system and at least they mention the definition. Anyone know about the iPod?

  113. Is this competition leading to freedom? by jbn-o · · Score: 1

    Neuros is also notable for allowing the user to modify the software controlling the device. As I understand it, the software on the device will be free software so end-users can turn it into a device to do things Digital Innovations didn't predict. It's valuable to be able to inspect, enhance, and fix software, even if it's running in an audio player. Does the Rio device run on free software?

    I appreciate the ethernet jack and that it plays Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files, but I want to be able to do other things with it that the designers did not predict. I'm willing to pay for the device, but I want freedom.

  114. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by jsebrech · · Score: 1

    Or, you could encode to ogg and rename your files to an .mp3 extension. Any player worth the bytes it's compiled to will play those files just fine.

  115. Breaks the mold? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...breaks from the pcmcia 1.8" hard drive mold that defines the ipod."

    How? Because it has a bulge? Isn't that (making things bigger extraneously) worse?

    1. Re:Breaks the mold? by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      It's square instead of rectangular. It's too short (3.0" long) to fit a 1.8" drive (3.37" long).

  116. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by zerocool^ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    as long as consumers aren't using it. And the answer to the question is a definite no

    it's being picked up, more so than you'd think.

    Historically, formats like this start out underground (witness mp3 on IRC back in the day, or divx 3 years ago). But, reading places like the Divx forums, people are really starting to take notice of oggs. It's becomming integrated into the current view of compressed music.

    Just give it a little bit. It'll be popular.

    --
    sig?
  117. have to wait a while.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A phone call placed to Rio revealed that they won't be shipping until sometime in September :(

  118. I'll run to the store for freedom, not dependency. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
    Quickly! To the Stores! Or to the Online Merchant of Your Choice!
    Since this is exactly what you've been calling for, I expect this thing to outsell the iPod in a week or two.

    If it runs on free software, I'll do just that. If not, then it's not what I'm asking for. It's close, and I like the other features it offers, but I'm not interested in paying to become dependant on even the most beneficent proprietor. Viva software freedom.

  119. Immovable force vs. Irresistable object by nobodyman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine the conundrum: Slashdotter cannot be satisfied until making obligatory it-doesn't-have Ogg-support-so-I-wont-buy-it rant.... but it does have Ogg support.

    All we need now is for the Microsoft is to file a brief against SCO. Have you ever seen the movie Scanners?

  120. Ya know by SandSpider · · Score: 1

    See, this is what doesn't help. Not your stance, which is all fine and good in the scheme of things. Hooray for standards and all that.

    What doesn't help is that it's, "Oh, I'll buy when it has Ogg Vorbis." "Did I say 'Ogg Vorbis'? I meant Ogg Vorbis when it's not a proprietary implementation."

    Reminds me of, "Oh, I'll buy music when I can buy it online, track by track, and for a low price." "Good lord, $1.00 a track? No no no! I meant $0.50 per track. Yeah. I'll just keep Kazaa running. And besides, it's on a Mac, which is proprietary even if it's, you know, kind of free, but not free the way I like it, so I'll just keep not buying anything."

    I mean, why would anyone want to go for this market? They'll probably complain when they release new models of hardware that do more than the old models, especially if they won't give away the software to do the new stuff on the old models. I mean, what could they be thinking?

    And that is why so few companies support Ogg Vorbis. Not because it's hard to do, not because it's expensive, not even because it's for such a small market. They don't support Ogg Vorbis because it's for a group of people who, by and large, will never be happy when they're buying a product.

    --
    There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
  121. Ethernet preferred? by LionMage · · Score: 1

    I don't know if they're pushing ethernet as the preferred connection method. But the device supports both ethernet and USB 2.0 (presumably HiSpeed). So you have your choice of traditional style syncing (via direct connection to the PC) or docked syncing. What could be better?

    The description of how the ethernet stuff works in another comment is really slick, and makes me want one... especially if that can work for me in Linux and Mac OS X!

  122. HOLY SWEET MOTHER OF GOD by Clockwurk · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    In my case, I care more about Xiph than cancer research.

    Yeah, royalty free audio codecs are much more important than a cure for a horrible painful disease that kills millions. I'd would gladly give up years of my life (spent with friends and family) to keep programmers from having to pay for use of an audio codec. WHEN YOU ARE BURNING IN HELL, REMEMBER TO REQUEST THAT YOUR SOULS SCREAMS ARE RECORDED IN A PATENT FREE FORMAT.

    1. Re:HOLY SWEET MOTHER OF GOD by Trongy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Millions upon millions of dollars have been spent on cancer research over the last few decades and still no broadly useful cures are on the horizon. (Although better treatments have been devised which increase life expectancy of cancer sufferers). Many cancer deaths could be avoided very cost effectivly by lifestyle changes such as not smoking and having a healthy diet. If you really care about pain and suffering of millions, much money allocated to cancer research could probably be better spent on other programs targetting other conditions such as AIDS, malnutrition and whooping cough.

      A small donation to cancer research is unlikely to make much of a difference to one's quality of life, given the millions already spent by governments and private foundations.

      A donation to the Xiph foundation does not look good in comparison to a donation to a more altruistic cause like cancer research. However, a donation to the Xiph foundation is probably more cost effective than buying a product that contains an mp3 or MS codec paying a hidden license fee.

    2. Re:HOLY SWEET MOTHER OF GOD by damiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I give $500 bucks to cancer research, is that going to save the life or reduce the suffering of a single person by a measurable amount? I doubt it. So many billions are already being spent on cancer research that my $500 is not going to make much of a difference. OTOH, $500 to Xiph (or GNU, or the EFF, or to any open source project of your choice) will have a much larger and more immediate effect.

      Ideally, of course, you'd give to both causes, as well as reducing world hunger, curing AIDS, and whatever other good causes you can think of. However, if you don't have that much money, you have to prioritize based on where you think your money would do the most good. Personally, I'd give the money to feeding the poor, or somewhere else where it'd have an immediate tangible effect, and then donate my time to Xiph. However, just because there are potentially nobler causes doesn't mean you have to give every spare cent to them, or that you can't put your money where you see a greater benefit. A dollar for Xiph will do much more good than a dollar for the Boy Scouts, the Republican Party, Slashdot, or any of a number of other causes people give to quite readily.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  123. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to rain on your parade, but I hardly see how one niche mail-order-only product with half-finished Vorbis support and another one that's not even for sale yet count as "many of the major portable players", unless RMS has included "many = none" is his word redefinition list.

  124. Streaming by raventh1 · · Score: 0

    Could I set this up as a network stream server? Ethernet is awesome. Everyone that has a network can access it at 10/100.

  125. music for donations? by Thinkit3 · · Score: 1

    I've actually been looking to get music that is freely available but accepts donations. I'd like .flac or other lossless if possible.

    --
    -Libertarian secular transhumanist
  126. Volt not technically a Rio product by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    It should be pointed out that the Volts are actually re-branded iRiver players. iRiver is a Korean corporation that had been manufacturing cheap CD players under a variety of names until Rio sold their player as the Rio Volt and actually made it successful. Now iRiver is selling the players under its own name and undercutting Rio's prices.

  127. The player software kicks major butt by ikkyikkyikkypikang · · Score: 1

    This product is developed by the folks at empeg. I've been using a car player they built (now discontinued) that was marketed by sonic blue (Incidentally, I got the 60GB version for just over $400 when Sonic Blue was cleaning out their inventory!).

    I haven't played with a whole lot of digital audio players, but the player software in the Rio Car (Player software 2.0) is simply awesome. The Karma will be using the next version (3.0 -- then us Rio Car owners should get it too!). With 2.0, everything is organized how you expect it to be. Playlist management is easy, yet highly customizable. Playlists organization allows nesting (I think this is pretty common) and allows files or playlists to reside in multiple places, so when I rip the new Plumb album, I create a playlist at "Rock\Plumb\Beautiful Lumps of Coal" and also "New Albums\Plumb\Beautiful Lumps of Coal", but of course there is only one copy of the audio on the drive(s).

    There are plenty of "wouldn't it be cool if..." features like: multiple insert modes (Insert, append, enqueue) while queueing up music, multiple (customizable) randomizer algorithms (Least recently played, Least often played, Newest additions, Just plain random), plenty of shortcuts (Navigate 5 playlists down to find some album and queue it up... re-enter playlists and hold the button down; it re-navigates the 5 playlists so you can choose one of its siblings), 10-band parametric EQ, "Wendy" filters (filter all gangsta rap from the playlists when your girlfriend is in the car), Bookmarks (Store your current queue of music/audiobooks to one of three "bookmark" positions, play something else when your friends are in the car on Friday night, then jump back to exactly where you were within your original music/audiobook queue), and a bunch of nifty visuals.

    Then, install Mark Lord's Hijack kernel, install Debian (if you want) and other apps that use Hijack, you get stuff like telnet access, ftp access, khttpd for web-based streaming (over ethernet) of .m3u/.mp3s, text-to-speech audio clocks, pacman, compression (not the space-saving kind... the audio level adjusting kind), and a bunch of other user-developed stuff.

    The designers are regular posters on the bulletin board. You may have noticed a couple of them posting in this thread.

    --
    -- This post (c) 2003, Knights who say Ni, LTD.
    1. Re:The player software kicks major butt by ikkyikkyikkypikang · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I forgot to mention a couple things:

      Another "wouldn't-it-be-cool-if" playlist feature: While playing an extra-large queue (for instance, all your 10,000 tracks in Random mode) there are order-tweak buttons on the remote. Tap the "2/abc/Artist" button to find another track in the queue by the same artist and move it to right after the current track. Hold the button down instead and it removes all tracks by that artist from the queue(Same goes for Genre, Source [album], Year and Title).

      Another geek-factor goodie that plugs into Hijack: a VNC Server. Here's a screenshot of the web interface with the VNC server running (displaying one of the "Informative" visuals: InfoTex Pist)

      While I'm not sure all the features the Car player has will be in the Karma, I know there will be some extra goodies we Car player guys don't have yet. The empeg guys seriously know how to make great player software; if the Karma is any bit as good as the Rio Car, I don't think you will be disappointed.

      --
      -- This post (c) 2003, Knights who say Ni, LTD.
  128. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
    Vorbis's plan for world domination:
    1. Moderate computer player support
    2. Moderate portable player support
    3. Default format for some rippers
    4. Offered by online music store
    5. Complete portable player support
    6. Default format for most rippers
    7. Offered by all non-DRM online music stores
    8. World domination
    Must ... control ... question marks ... profit ... of ... death!
  129. Re:Is Ogg Vorbis finally gaining industry acceptan by H8X55 · · Score: 0

    AND now that Winamp plays ogg's I wonder how many folks actually have them, but don't know it.

  130. Just got a new Sony by monk_e_monk · · Score: 1

    hey i just got a new Sony D-NE710 MP3/ATRAC3/CD Walkman for 99.99 at radioshack and got a free spool of 50 cd-rs with it. if you burn with the atrac you can get a lot more songs on there, but they dont sound as good to me. i just burn my 150 song mix cds at 32x 3 minutes before i leave for work and i deliver pizza and have no repeats all night when i drive. and ive got so many mp3s. it works out really nicely for a hundred bones. only problem is is that it isnt real good at playing very scratched cds. but it only skipped on mine that were super scratched. whats the best cd cleaner? oh yeah this is my first /. post.

  131. Free software should be the default. by jbn-o · · Score: 1
    What doesn't help is that it's, "Oh, I'll buy when it has Ogg Vorbis." "Did I say 'Ogg Vorbis'? I meant Ogg Vorbis when it's not a proprietary implementation."

    I don't owe them business. They have to come up with something I'll like before I'll buy it. I'm doing them a favor by telling them what I want rather than silently rejecting the product. Furthermore, what I'm asking for can be accomplished without altering the hardware they've already built.

    They'll probably complain when they release new models of hardware that do more than the old models, especially if they won't give away the software to do the new stuff on the old models.

    I never asked for anyone to give away software, perhaps you should reread what I am asking for. I want software freedom and I'm willing to pay for it. Free software, the kind I'm asking for, has to do with the freedom to share and modify the software, not price. If someone sells me a copy of the device software under a free software license, and/or distributes the specifications for the hardware (so I can make my own controlling software or hire someone to make it for me), I'm satisfied.

    As I clearly stated before, the Rio device already has attractive hardware features. It would be more attractive with free software so I can study, change, share, and freely use the unit as I wish. I believe this poses no threat to any portable digital device business because they make their money from selling the units, not the software. To the contrary, I think this information is critical to developing a sustainable diverse userbase and a good relationship between the consumer and the businesses that deliver the goods.

    I mean, why would anyone want to go for this market?

    First, your critique has shifted off-topic from talking about digital music player hardware to talking about delivering audio tracks. Second, to answer your question directly: Because they have little choice but to go where the market leads. The alternative--using legalized bribery to buy new laws to protect old business models--is possible but doesn't pay off quickly or thoroughly enough for those businesses and commercial artists who don't innovate. People are discovering the weaknesses in the old distribution model; as more people become distributors, we have a decreasing need for the distribution aspect of recording studios. Studios need to change their business model to become less dependent on distribution. Ultimately, no laws will change the technology that lets people share.

    And that is why so few companies support Ogg Vorbis. Not because it's hard to do, not because it's expensive, not even because it's for such a small market. They don't support Ogg Vorbis because it's for a group of people who, by and large, will never be happy when they're buying a product.

    I doubt it. Do you have any evidence to support this?

    1. Re:Free software should be the default. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't feed the idiot trolls.

    2. Re:Free software should be the default. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just did.

  132. Rio have given development time & resources by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 1

    Right now Ogg/Vorbis really needs to be implemented on the standard chip sets out there.

    I have an I-bead, the development kit for the chipset it uses costs $12k. As an amature, with no prior DSP experience, I am not about to fork out $12k only to find out that for some reason it is not even possible to implement a Vorbis codec on it.

    Any manufacture who is doing this work, at this moment in time, is benefitting Xiph tremendously.

    1. Re:Rio have given development time & resources by mink · · Score: 1

      The NEX II can play OGG via a firmware upgrade (at least it says that on the website).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  133. Unicode? by pronik · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know ANY portable player that is able to show UTF-8 encoded filenames and/or tags? It is just a PITA to latinize many russian songs (yes, my system is Debian Linux Sid with an UTF-8 locale and yes, I have already written a script to automatize latinizing filenames).

    1. Re:Unicode? by pdh11 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Does anybody know ANY portable player that is able to show UTF-8 encoded filenames and/or tags?

      Karma keeps all track information in UTF-8, and the transfer software fully understands UTF-8 and UTF-16 tags. Unfortunately the very first release of the Karma firmware won't have Unicode fonts, but we're currently intending to offer a subsequent free upgrade including glyphs for Cyrillic, Greek and Kanji. The Rio Nitrus (the 1.5Gb micro-hard-disk player which we've also just announced) has UTF-8 support including Cyrillic, Greek and Kanji from the word go.

      Peter

    2. Re:Unicode? by pronik · · Score: 1

      That's great news! I guess I'll start putting money aside :)

  134. Ogg me baby one more time by future+assassin · · Score: 0
    Ogg and Icecast2 is were its at for streaming. At 56K stereo my Icacast/ogg stream rocks on Shoutcast/Mp3 at the same bit rate. Though I must admit Shoutcast is far more stable then Icecast2 (at least on Windowns it is) never tried it on Linus.

    Old school Jungle/Hardcore webcast

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
  135. The *winchester* by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    ...that's more than the head rate of the winchester

    Ahhh - the Winchester... it takes me back to when we first got an RM Nimbus network in school (around 1986, I suppose) - we had a network with a 20 Megabyte Winchester. I thought it was awesome. 20 Megabytes!

  136. "Think of Ogg as MP3 only better." by Quizo69 · · Score: 1

    "Think of Ogg as MP3 only better."

    That is EXACTLY what I tell my friends and anyone who asks what Ogg is after I mention it in passing.

    Everyone knows what MP3 is - compressed audio you can get from the internet that plays on some cool portable players. (Joe Sixpack thinking)

    Ogg needs to elevate itself into the psyche of the general Joe Sixpacks with a catchy, easy to remember phrase anyone will remember. Sure, it's really called Ogg Vorbis. Yeah, it's not exactly like MP3. Forget that it's open source and royalty free. Those are geeky points we know about, but Joe doesn't.

    Joe will remember this if you gently say it enough and burn it into his brain:

    "Think of Ogg as MP3 only better."

    Quizo69

  137. Hack, verb: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To modify a complex device or system so as to exceed its previously known capabilities or limits. Such a change is known as a hack (noun).

    This refers particularly to the skill required of the hacker to perform the modification and the usefulness or interestingness of the result. Whether it is appreciated by the original designer or maker is not relevant to the quality of the hack, except insofar as deliberate attempts to prevent hacking require additional skill of the hacker.

    A hack is sometimes packaged in the form of a tool which performs the change on command. The use of such a tool does not constitute hacking, as the result is not unexpected nor is particular skill required.

    While hackers use tools developed by others, it is the use of those tools to achieve novel ends that is hacking.

    A system that is particularly extensible in interesting ways is "hackable".

  138. But, there is no Music Store ! by moofo · · Score: 1

    Too bad, but with this doohickey you won't be able to play Apple Music Store AAC files... I don't know if iTunes will support this new Rio...

    Although I'm in Canada and I can't use this feature yet, it would be a major annoyance for me...

    Also I want to point out that the iPod dock does include a line out. It is not of RCA type, it's actually a 1/8" plug, but it does sound wonderfully. The volume level of the iPod does not affect this line out.

    Now if only we could get a Super Dock with a Remote...

    The geekness factor is high, but still, the elegance and ease of use of the iPod is neat...

    --
    "I've heard nonsense, compared with which that would be as sensible as a dictionary." Through the looking glass and what
  139. Re:I'll run to the store for freedom, not dependen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>> I'm not interested in paying to become dependant on even the most beneficent proprietor.

    Just out of curiosity, do you rent or own?

  140. Re:Fill Me In by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the FAQ.