Slashdot Mirror


Highway Shooters Claim To Emulate GTA

Thanks to Yahoo! for their story regarding teenage stepbrothers who randomly fired at cars on a Tennessee freeway, killing one person and wounding another, and told police they were inspired by Grand Theft Auto's sniper mode. According to the piece: "From a wooded area near their home at the Smoky Mountain Country Club, the boys fired a .22-caliber rifle up to 25 times through a break in the trees at cars driving along Interstate 40 about two miles east of Newport. They said they were bored and decided to shoot at tractor-trailer rigs, just like in the video game, 'Grand Theft Auto.'" According to this IOL/Reuters article, "Prosecutor Al Schmutzer told Judge Ben Strand that the boys told authorities they were mimicking the video game by trying to hit the sides of passing trucks."

313 comments

  1. Sounds familiar by BoomerSooner · · Score: 4, Funny

    I did this as a kid (with a BB Gun) and that was before GTA. I guess I can blame it on the Duke Boys.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar by RexRuther · · Score: 1, Informative

      The Duke boys never used guns, as they were on probation. In fact I don't think guns were ever fired by anyone on the show. There were alot of car crashes though and at least one sick a$$ jump per episode.

      --
      -"The early bird catches the worm, but the late bird sleeps the most"
    2. Re:Sounds familiar by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what I said when my parents found my moonshine still.

      --
      Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
    3. Re:Sounds familiar by freebfrost · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, this is true.

      However, they did have a stock of dynamite-enhanced arrows...

    4. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There you go again with those damn facts! Go ahead, knock the wind out of an allready fragile joke.

    5. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1. Do something illegal.
      2. Claim it was a violent computer game or Marilyn Manson who "inspired me to do it".
      3. Get the sympathy of white America.
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

    6. Re:Sounds familiar by Keebler71 · · Score: 3, Funny

      you mean "them Duke boys" right?

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    7. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      4. Write a book about it
      5. Profit!

    8. Re:Sounds familiar by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

      We had to drive to the next county to get away from trouble.

    9. Re:Sounds familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone that does such an act - you with your BB gun, or these hill-billies in TN, should be executed. It's obvious that you . . . as well as tweedle dumb and tweedle stupid . . . are not fit for human society . . . and shouldn't be allowed to procreate.

    10. Re:Sounds familiar by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
      3. Get the sympathy of white America.

      I doubt these guys will be getting much sympathy from anyone, actually.

    11. Re:Sounds familiar by asit+ler · · Score: 0

      It's a game. Anyone as tight-assed as you are should remove themselves from the gene pool as rapidly as possible, preferably taking children as well. And hey, have your wife write up a Darwin award about it!

      --
      This is not the sig you're looking for.
    12. Re:Sounds familiar by richie2000 · · Score: 1

      1. Invade the house of some shifty-looking arab down the block because you "suspect he has a really, really big gun somewhere".
      2. Claim "George W. Bush inspired me to do it".
      3. Do some serious time in a federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    13. Re:Sounds familiar by rifter · · Score: 1

      1. Invade the house of some shifty-looking arab down the block because you "suspect he has a really, really big gun somewhere".
      2. Claim "George W. Bush inspired me to do it".
      3. Do some serious time in a federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison.
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

      These days I would not be surprised if they put the arab in jail instead.

  2. ohhhh... by cabra771 · · Score: 5, Funny

    so that's what you're suppose to do in the game...
    no wonder I suck playing GTA3.

    --

    -my other sig is your mom
    1. Re:ohhhh... by bamurphy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, its a good thing they didnt take a bunch of hookers out to the park and beat them with baseball bats!

    2. Re:ohhhh... by trompete · · Score: 1

      There's no better way to get stamina!! Don't forget to kill her too or she gets to keep your money.
      Sound asinine? That's how the game works.

    3. Re:ohhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't "get your money back," you just get money for killing the hooker as you do when killing other people.

    4. Re:ohhhh... by einTier · · Score: 1

      Stealing an ambulance seems to work better and quicker. Or, finding a heart icon.

      Honestly, I've gotten 100% on both GTA3 and GTA: Vice City, and I've never used the hooker trick in the course of the game. I used it once or twice in GTA3, just to see how it worked, and probably a half dozen times to show friends who wanted to know what all the hoopla was about. It's far from an intergal part of the game.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- $665.95 -- retail price of the beast.
    5. Re:ohhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the 150 health pizza delivery bit.. kinda weird.. but cool.

    6. Re:ohhhh... by balthan · · Score: 1

      The heart icon doesn't get your health up to 125, though, which comes in handy for difficult missions.

    7. Re:ohhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Body armor is *MUCH* more effective, combined with an M16 or in GTA:VC an M60. Sniper rifles only tend to bed useful on special missions since getting the range to not have some SOB blow your ass off tends to put you outside pedestrian spawn zones.

      -- vranash

  3. Funny by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's not any tractor-trailers in GTA.

    Sorry Mr. Prosecutor, got to come up with something better than that.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:Funny by Zardoz44 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, there's this: LineRunner Which is close enough. Plus some large vans and firetrucks.

    2. Re:Funny by Syncdata · · Score: 1

      Sorry Mr. Prosecutor, got to come up with something better than that
      Hackwork defenses are the job of the defense attorney. The prosecutor would be the one dopesmacking the GTA argument.

      --
      "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    3. Re:Funny by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      That's the normal way things work, but here in bizarro world, the prosecutors have agendas, and relay such stupid statements from the accused to the press.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:Funny by Noren · · Score: 1

      Except that it never occurs with a trailer attached, and you can't hitch a trailer to one. The original poster was correct, no tractor/trailer rigs occur in GTA. I suspect the game engine can't display flexible vehicles as a trailer would require.

    5. Re:Funny by delstar+dotstar · · Score: 1
      I suspect the game engine can't display flexible vehicles as a trailer would require.
      You're forgetting that GTA3 had an elevated train w/ articulated cars.
    6. Re:Funny by Noren · · Score: 1
      Good point... but the range of motion of them was very limited, I think. (I didn't experiment with them all that much.) They did have to convert from straight train to curved train... but they didn't have to interact with the environment like a drivable vehicle would. (They only needed one turning radius, no jumps, limited effect of collisions, no backing up....)

      I think that drivable flexible vehicles would be a separate challenge. Not that it'd be impossible, but I suspect they didn't code the engine for it, or else they'd've used it somewhere...

  4. So what are you saying? by wbav · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We need to make a game where people jump off a cliff and kill them selves to finally clean out the shallow end of the gene pool? Sheesh. People will say anything these days to shift blame from themselves.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    1. Re:So what are you saying? by reynaert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We need to make a game where people jump off a cliff and kill them selves to finally clean out the shallow end of the gene pool? Yep. See Stair Dismount and Truck Dismount.

    2. Re:So what are you saying? by ciupman · · Score: 1

      I see you never heard about cliffhanger, have you?

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    3. Re:So what are you saying? by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Lemmings would be more appropriate. For the truly evil, just send them off a cliff without turning one into a blocker.....

      --
      Karnal
    4. Re:So what are you saying? by Cecil · · Score: 1

      I always appreciated the "Lemming Nuke-Drilling Co." approach. Two blockers on either sides of the lemming dropper, wait until they're all out, then nuke away and see how deep you can go.

      Those poor little Lemmings. Oh well.

    5. Re:So what are you saying? by PK_ERTW · · Score: 1
      Just for those of you who still don't know, lemmings don't go around jumping off cliffs and committing suicide. You can read all the details at snopes. Basically, the footage was staged.

      That aside, what's done is done, I want to see the White Wilderness episode with the lemming herding. I wonder if filming it was something like heding cats?

      pk

      --
      Engineers arn't boring people, we just get excited about boring things.
    6. Re:So what are you saying? by coryboehne · · Score: 1

      We need to make a game where people jump off a cliff and kill them selves to finally clean out the shallow end of the gene pool? Sheesh. People will say anything these days to shift blame from themselves.



      Well, the story line isn't perfect.. But I think it's close enough... Try using Stair Dismount it should fit the bill well enough...

    7. Re:So what are you saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you've never played the game "Lemmings"...

      Dur.

    8. Re:So what are you saying? by johnkoer · · Score: 1

      We need to make a game where people jump off a cliff and kill them selves
      Have you ever heard of the game Lemmings??

    9. Re:So what are you saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Psygnosis version didn't really have them running for a cliff, they just ambled blindly. Arguably this is pretty accurate for a lemming.

      However, the Sirius Software game Lemmings for the Apple ][ (first game I ever bought) did have an eventuality where the lemmings got overpopulated (from breeding - which it was your responsibility to prevent them from doing by first locking them up in same-sex pairs (all the hanky-panky, none of the pregnancy) and then delivering them one at a time to the SPCA truck for neutering. If you were unable to keep up with population growth, they'd sound a little charge and run en masse off the cliff into the ocean, ending the game.

      I believe this game-borne misinformation is what prevented me from becoming a zoologist. So don't tell me games don't affect people's lives.

    10. Re:So what are you saying? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't there a game called Lemmings.

    11. Re:So what are you saying? by jrockway · · Score: 1

      This is slashdot, you know. So don't recommend Lemmings, recommend Pingus! It's hard, though, to kill the little pingus. They're too cute!

      --
      My other car is first.
    12. Re:So what are you saying? by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      If you were unable to keep up with population growth, they'd sound a little charge and run en masse off the cliff into the ocean, ending the game.

      I believe this game-borne misinformation is what prevented me from becoming a zoologist. So don't tell me games don't affect people's lives.


      Prevented you from becoming a zoologist? Sounds like you're passing the buck just a little. You have to make the decisions that guide your life's direction. If you really were serious about becoming a Zoologist, this non-fact would have peaked your curiosity and you would have did some research. At least, that's what I think I would have done.

  5. I was like this once by one9nine · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I was nine, I wound up in the hospital with three broken fingers becuase I tried to imitate Super Mario by punching bricks that were floating in the sky. Those were the days.

    1. Re:I was like this once by ciupman · · Score: 1

      Sorry mister .. but that's just baloney .. there aren't floating bricks in real world ... >;) Who are you trying to fool here? >;D

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    2. Re:I was like this once by zsazsa · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry mister .. but that's just baloney .. there aren't floating bricks in real world ...

      Sure there are.

    3. Re:I was like this once by ciupman · · Score: 1

      OH MY GOD ;D AHAHAHA!!!

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    4. Re:I was like this once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ, I wish there was a moderation option for "-1 Stupid".

    5. Re:I was like this once by ciupman · · Score: 1

      That was ment to be sarcastic ..

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    6. Re:I was like this once by trompete · · Score: 1

      I almost fell out of my chair laughing. Thank you for this hilarious link. You've made my Friday!!

    7. Re:I was like this once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, apparently you didn't have any difficulties finding and eating the magic mushroom first.

    8. Re:I was like this once by ciupman · · Score: 1

      One question though.. wasn't mario supposed to grow bigger only after eating the mushroom? .. ehehe nice try, you almost caught me, floating blocks .. bahh >;)..

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    9. Re:I was like this once by isorox · · Score: 1

      I ended up with tennis elbow because I tried emulating pong - it hsould be banned! Think of the children!

    10. Re:I was like this once by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I setup a gun turret so I could shoot down the incoming Soviet missles just like in Missle Command, but I got bored because they weren't coming down as fast as they did in the game. So I went over and stomped on some centipedes, but that wasn't nearly as interesting as that particular game, either. So, I went back inside to play more games.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    11. Re:I was like this once by xenocytekron · · Score: 1

      If he's already big, and he smashes a brick, if another mushroom comes, it won't make him even bigger.

      --
      This is my .sig, if you don't like it, it will eat you.
    12. Re:I was like this once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it didn't work. I'd also mod it "-1, Stupid", and if I had another mod point, the post I'm replying to now would also get it.

    13. Re:I was like this once by binarie · · Score: 0

      then it shouldn't have been a shroom, but a flower instead :P

  6. It's rated mature... by Basje · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ESRB rating for GTA3 and VC is 17+. What were these kids doing with a game that they shouldn't be playing? They should sue the parents for negligence.

    --
    the pun is mightier than the sword
    1. Re:It's rated mature... by ciupman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Have you ever heard about, P2P??? Do you think those kids actually buy those games?

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    2. Re:It's rated mature... by djiin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More to the point, what were these kids doing with access to a rifle?
      Don't get me wrong, I am not about to launch an anti-gun tirade, but like any tool it should be used responsibly and until you can show good judgement in your actions you shouldn't be using them unsupervised

    3. Re:It's rated mature... by Andy+Smith · · Score: 1
      The ESRB rating for GTA3 and VC is 17+. What were these kids doing with a game that they shouldn't be playing? They should sue the parents for negligence.
      Or maybe they should sue games publishers and developers for actively fighting any attempts to make retailers obey the rating "recommendations". Industry representatives and trade associations claim the ratings system works but then they go to court to make sure the ratings aren't legally enforced. Hmm, why is that?
    4. Re:It's rated mature... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Ratings of movies and parental advisory stickers on music are not legally enforced, why should the ratings on games be?

      Theaters, rental outlets, and retail stores all choose for themselves whether or not to enforce the ratings, and many do. Rental outlets include the option for parents to decide whether or not their children can rent movies and games of any rating without the parents having to be there. Some stores further choose not to stock certain games, movies, and music based on content and/or ratings. None of this, however, is backed by any legal enforcement of any sort in most states.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:It's rated mature... by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, so because their children _stole_ a game they shouldn't have been playing, it's ok and the parents are absolved of any responsibility?

      That's one view I guess...not the one I'd take though.

      --
      No Comment.
    6. Re:It's rated mature... by trompete · · Score: 1

      "Guns don't kill people. I KILL PEOPLE"

      - Happy Gilmore

    7. Re:It's rated mature... by ciupman · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying that parents should be absolved .. it's easier to hide that game existence from the parents (when downloaded) than if it was actually bought .. Another example .. for a porn addict it's more convenient to download the stuff than to rent of buy it .. it's more hidden. Many parents with 17 year kids don't even know how to handle a computer, now imagine ..P2P

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    8. Re:It's rated mature... by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A parent doesn't have to understand computers to teach their children what are acceptable and allowed uses of that computer.

      If parents can keep an eye on what television their children watch, as they should, why can't they keep an eye on what is on their computer screen? There is absolutely no difference at all. Downloading a game off P2P is akin to hiding a porno mag in the attic. Still got to open it to use it so watch your damned children!

      (No, I don't expect anyone to watch every single thing your children ever do, but I guarantee that regular spot checking will keep these unwanted behaviors in line.)

      (And no, porn isn't necessarily bad, I've just used it as an example. All young boys end up viewing porn at some point, but do you really want them absorbing a constant stream of anal love and beastiality? Keep it in check people!)

      --
      No Comment.
    9. Re:It's rated mature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the part where they had a gun ?

    10. Re:It's rated mature... by digeratus · · Score: 0, Troll

      I am not about to launch an anti-gun tirade

      Bah. Personally, I think that no guns would definitely mean no gun crime.

    11. Re:It's rated mature... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Bah. Personally, I think that no guns would definitely mean no gun crime.

      Hahahaha.. just like no drugs would definitely mean no drug crimes?

    12. Re:It's rated mature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Exactly. Then we could get back to good old fashioned knife crimes.

    13. Re:It's rated mature... by Basje · · Score: 1

      I'm dutch, so the fact that they had a gun didn't even register with me. Still, getting access to a gun can be an incident. As a parent, you can be sure there are lapses in your attention. Children are bound to escape your attention from time to time.

      On the other hand, playing a game isn't an incident, it's structural. That suggests that the parents were not paying attention to their children, over a prolonged period of time.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    14. Re:It's rated mature... by digeratus · · Score: 0

      Hmm. Apparently I'm now a troll. Well excuse me if trolls wish to lower gun crime. Also, how do these ratings systems work? I dont see any flashy buttons anywhere to vote for different posts. And if it's controlled by some database, how can it tell what type of post it is? I havn't met many servers with a sense of humour. (humor?)

      And while we're on the subject of my views on law, I would also outlaw drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, meat; broadband would be a human right and clothes would NOT be required in public (why do we condemn countries for not allowing women to show their faces, when we're not allowed to show our genitals? Shame on America).

    15. Re:It's rated mature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a troll because there's no '-1 stupid' mod.

    16. Re:It's rated mature... by JackDeth · · Score: 1

      Bah. Personally, I think that no guns would definitely mean no gun crime.

      You're right, but if you can come up with a "no guns" solution that would actually work, I'll nominate you for a Nobel prize.
      Then we can focus on other killers like spears, knives, cars, etc...

      My personal opinion is that better education would mean fewer stupid people.

    17. Re:It's rated mature... by Fex303 · · Score: 1
      All young boys end up viewing porn at some point, but do you really want them absorbing a constant stream of anal love?

      Am I the only one who finds the line "absorbing a constant stream of anal love" conjuring up images that I never wanted to think of?

      On the other hand, it's brilliant opportunity for some sort of joke about priests...

    18. Re:It's rated mature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never been to Tennessee...

    19. Re:It's rated mature... by detritus. · · Score: 1

      From the ESRB:

      ESRB Helps Parents Choose the Right Games for Their Families

      The ESRB rating system is designed to give parents the information they need to evaluate a computer or video game before making a purchasing decision. The ratings are not meant to recommend which games consumers should buy or rent or to serve as the only basis for choosing a product. Rather, parents should use the ESRB ratings in conjunction with their own tastes and standards and their individual knowledge about what's best for their kids.

      And here:

      ESRB is responsible for enforcement of its rating system. We monitor compliance and investigate violations of ESRB's Rules and Regulations. Where appropriate, we impose penalties against companies that violate ESRB labeling, marketing, or product submission rules.

      Although the ESRB does not have the authority to enforce the ratings at the retail level, we do work closely with retailers and game centers to encourage them to display ratings information and not sell or rent certain product to minors. In fact, many retailers have signed up for ESRB's Commitment to Parents program in which they pledge to use their best efforts not to rent or sell M-rated games to children under 17 without parental consent. For a list of retailers that participate in the Commitment to Parents program click here.

    20. Re:It's rated mature... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

      how about "-5 idiot"? That seem more appropriate, somehow...

      You'ld definately have to outlaw guns first, because when you got down to outlawing meat, you REALLY wouldn't like us to still have guns.

      But that's just me and everyone else I know....

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  7. So what are you saying? (read more) by wbav · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real question is, who was dumb enough to give these kids a gun.

    They should receive the same punishment, because through their action/inaction they helped kill this driver.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    1. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by lafiel · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The real question is, who was dumb enough to give these kids a gun.

      Probably the parents were pathetic and irresponsible people as well. All this blame on games is pretty stupid, why don't you blame on the people that couldn't teach the kids that a game is a game, and shouldn't be tried in the real world?

      You'd think these kids had some sort of teachings that taught them "shooting a truck with a gun is bad". It seems glaringly obvious the parents are at fault here, and people are once again looking for the scapegoat to blame.

      Get some responsible parents, stop blaming games/tv/(insert someone else here).

    2. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by GigsVT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is such bullshit. For years, kids had .22 rifles for recreation and sport, and no one thought that it was a crime to give their son a gun after he was 11 or 12 and old enough to know how to use it responsibly.

      It's all about teaching the child proper respect for the firearm, and supervising them until you know they have it.

      If you wonder why so many people are growing up to be irresponsible people, you might look at how people like you seek to protect them for having any real responsibility for anything until they are 18. They killed someone, and they should be held fully responsible for that, not their parents.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Who's looking for the scapegoat here? You seek to blame their parents, which is just another scapegoat.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by emilng · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The parents are always responsible for their children's actions. The media is not going to report on this because irresponisble parents are not going to want to watch or read anything that tells them that they are bad parents. You don't want to potentially alienate your audience. It's much easier to blame it on movies and videogames.

    5. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why shouldn't the parents be punished along with the kids. Is it not their responsibility to teach the kid the proper respect for a firearm, and to supervise them?

      Shit man, if we followed your idea, then just because a teacher wanted to watch tv, rather than actually teach kids and the kids would have rather watch tv rather than learn, it would be the kids fault they didn't learn anything. It is the adult's responisbility to teach kids, otherwise how are they going to learn? And when someone does not fulfill their responsibilities, shouldn't they be punished?

    6. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Reapy · · Score: 1

      How about we blame the people that pointed the gun at human beings and pulled the trigger?

    7. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by pmz · · Score: 1

      It seems glaringly obvious the parents are at fault here, and people are once again looking for the scapegoat to blame.

      Actually, the parents and the community that family lives in are at fault. Cliques in school can reinforce bizarre and counter-intuitive ideas about morality, teachers often don't keep the kids stimulated while managing their "day care", and other adults in the community may simply be bad role models. For example, if a neighbor resorts to baiting a deer to his back yard and shooting it from his deck, what kind of lesson is that? If kids see movies like "Fast and Furious" and there is no local cultural restraints towards complete irresponsibility and the parents buy each kid a 200HP compact sports car for their 16th birthday, what should we expect?

      One thing I've noticed, is that if a kid is a complete asshole, the people around him or her are very likely complete assholes, too. Either that, or the parents are so weak-willed that the kids walk all over them daily with no retribution.

    8. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      How about we blame the people that pointed the gun at human beings and pulled the trigger?

      This is America. Nothing is anybody's fault, it's always someone else's fault.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    9. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by digeratus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK. So it's the kid's fault. No wait, it was the game's fault. No wait, it was the parents fault. Oh no, wait! It was actually the community that the parents lived in!

      How long can we keep passing the buck?

      When people shoot cars, it's thir fault, full stop.

    10. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by pmz · · Score: 1

      How long can we keep passing the buck?

      I wasn't passing the buck at all. A community raises everyone within it. The parents ultimately have the most influence and bear the brunt of the responsibility, but every member of a community influences everyone else in it. This cannot be ignored.

      Basically, it can be argued that humans are going through an adolescence of civilization right now. We still have prisons, personal freedom is still in question, there is still corruption in the government, etc. It will be a long time before any idealistic utopia of humanity comes about. A very long time. Quite honestly, I think we are just a very small notch above the apes, as they often exhibit better social structure than we do!

    11. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parents are a scapegoat? Not hardly. They are supposed to be responsible for their own children. Period. They brought them into this world, they had damn well better keep them from endangering other people.

    12. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by LudditeMind · · Score: 1

      That is such bullshit.

      How is that bullshit? These kids killed someone. Whoever gave them the guns obviously did something wrong with regards to their firearm education. We're talking about a specific situation here, and in retrospect how could it be anything but stupid to let these children have access to guns.

    13. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Whoever gave them the guns obviously did something wrong with regards to their firearm education.

      Correct. It was obviously a mistake to give them a gun, especially if they didn't give them the requsite education and training to learn how to use it for recreation properly and respect it, which is highly likely.

      But when you go as far to say that someone else is responsible for their actions, I think that's taking it way too far.

      Psychologists already trace most mental defects that lead to murder to the killer's childhood, so how far should this vicarious liability be taken?

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    14. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Is it not their responsibility to teach the kid the proper respect for a firearm, and to supervise them?

      It is, and I'm not saying they are totally separate from the matter. However, it's a jump to say they are responsible for the actions of someone else.

      It's that kind of logic that gets us multi-billion dollar tobacco lawsuits, people suing over fatty foods, idiotic warning labels on products, criminals suing when they are hurt in the process of a crime, etc.

      The foundation of our country is responsibility for one's actions.

      shouldn't they be punished?

      Maybe. I think the proper channel would be civil lawsuits, which there is already a framework for suing parents of children who commit a tort. There's no need for new criminal laws in regard to this. Any such law would set a dangerous precedent. No current criminal law punishes a person for the actions of someone else, with a few slim exceptions.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    15. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Xerxes+of+Zealot · · Score: 1
      "No current criminal law punishes a person for the actions of someone else, with a few slim "

      Actually there are such laws in some parts of America. If a student is found criminally truant some places will punish the parent as well as the student. There are other such laws (I believe vandalism also) but this one comes to mind because this almost happened to a friend of mine when she wanted to drop out of school last year: The city threatened her dad because she missed two weeks of school with no excuse.

    16. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      The truancy laws were actually what I had in mind when I wrote the "few slim exceptions" part.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    17. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by jadavis · · Score: 1

      The parents ultimately have the most influence and bear the brunt of the responsibility...

      No, the kids bear the most responsibility. They should be in prison like any other murderers. A 14 year old and a 16 year old both know what a gun is, and that it hurts people in front of it when fired (I knew that a long time before I was 14!).

      The whole blaming parents thing doesn't do a thing for me. What if the parents blame their parents, or their community, or their parents' parents? You keep up witht that and nobody gets punished.

      You are passing the buck. These kids are murderers and committed random acts of violence with no justification whatsoever. They should be punished severely.

      What is an example of a person you would like to see in prison? Who can't blame their parents?

      --
      Social scientists are inspired by theories; scientists are humbled by facts.
    18. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Shardis · · Score: 1

      But that would make too much sense!

      Sheesh...

    19. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 1
      the parents buy each kid a 200HP compact sports car

      They could just buy them a 100 HP Honda with a big metal spoiler, and the kid wouldn't know the difference.

    20. Re:So what are you saying? (read more) by Merk · · Score: 1

      The other real question is, what country was dumb enough to make getting guns easy, either for the kids or the ones who the kids got them from.

  8. idiot box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Prosecutor Al Schmutzer told Judge Ben Strand that the boys told authorities they were mimicking the video game by trying to hit the sides of passing trucks."

    Yeah, and he probably forget to mention to the judge that due to the lack of parental attention and involvement in these boys lives, they grew up to be anti-social and depressed kids who deep-down really just wanted somebody to pay attention to them while their parents sat on the couch, drank beer, and worshipped the idiot box.

    1. Re:idiot box by bamurphy · · Score: 1

      Stories like this, and the everquest-baby-death and all others are so old at this point it really is hardly worth anyone even getting upset on either side.

      Nobody will ever actually successfully scapegoat a videogame company or rock band, all it serves to do is create more press and probably sales. Any real censorship isn't going to come from cases like this, but rather from PATRIOT-style laws.

      Conversely, no amount of sensible talk will convince any loser criminal/flunkie that they control their own lives. If all else fails they will blame satan or their parents.

      Fact of the matter is it's a mixture of all things, but most importantly: nobody cares. Random violence and stupidity has always been with man, and it will continue to be! At least as long as it makes for good ratings.

    2. Re:idiot box by michael_lacy · · Score: 1
      but most importantly: nobody cares.

      bullshit...i do

      i have 2 kids that are growing up in this world of random violence and stupidity.

      I am going to change the system...

      --

      ======

      Belief is beyond reason. I believe because it is absurd.

    3. Re:idiot box by ciupman · · Score: 1

      I've heard that those teletubby games mess even worse with kids minds..avoid at all costs!

      --
      I fuse with Mercer every single day...
    4. Re:idiot box by Niobium-41 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.. I mean.. look at the teletubbies.. then look at the child obeisity problem... I think there may be a connection.. Sue the Teletubbies.. they are working with McDonalds to make us all fatties!!

    5. Re:idiot box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly...look at what actually happened (real people died) and your stupid-ass response...

      therein lies the problem...so many goddamn Americans thinking that they are funny when in fact they sound exactly like a bunch of idiots working at MTV ...but that's just my opinion

    6. Re:idiot box by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Exactly...look at what actually happened (real people died) and your stupid-ass response...

      Well, boo-fucking-hoo. Cry me a goddamn river. Life is a ZERO SUM GAME. You're NOT guaranteed to win. In fact, you're not even guaranteed to survive long enough to push your way out of your mother's wretched womb. Now that I think about it, you're not guaranteed anything, ever, from anybody. Stop your stupid whining and bitching, and wake up to the reality of LIFE. Every single man, woman, and child that is alive today WILL DIE... it's just a question of when. Don't like it? Sue god. The stupid kids who pulled the trigger are responsible, and should be killed... both of them. They're old enough to know better than shooting people on a highway. Screw them... it's obvious they're not going to amount to much in society. It's time to wipe their slate clean and make room for someone who actually wants to produce something of value and contribute something to the world. Put those kids to death, and let their parents greive for the next few years. Maybe then, when they have another kid, they'll pay attention to the little fucker and he won't grow up to shoot someone.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
  9. Hit the trailer? by Jayjr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now if they were imitating a game by shooting at tractor trailers and trying to hit the trailer (those of which ther are none of in GTA3/GTA:VC) how the hell did they hit people. They must not play many FPS's either if they cant hit the broad side of a truck without hitting a person in another car ... This is just what the Games=Violence activists need, more ammunition (no pun intended)

    1. Re:Hit the trailer? by wynterwynd · · Score: 1

      This is just what the Games=Violence activists need, more ammunition (no pun intended)

      Oh come on now, surely you know that opening a crate of ammo for them was the whole point behind introducing the videogame element into the case. I'll wager it was a briefly mentioned fact in the boys' questioning and the DA seized on that detail, magnifying it into fuel for his political career. If not that then it was a desperate attempt by the boys to divert some of the blame from their shoulders. Or perhaps a bit of both, as most truths usually are.

      --
      "Not all who wander are lost" -- JRR Tolkien
    2. Re:Hit the trailer? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Now if they were imitating a game by shooting at tractor trailers and trying to hit the trailer (those of which ther are none of in GTA3/GTA:VC) how the hell did they hit people."

      I think we can chalk this up to playing on a fear that the media has created. Thanks to the media's irresponsible reporting of GTA (and EverQuest), uninformed parents start worrying that their kids, their little angels, their precious babies will be warped. So when these kids decided to do something stupid, they played on that fear by blaming GTA. Mommy will want to believe this because it doesn't reflect badly on her. It also makes her believe that her baby is a good boy, just had a bad influence.

      It's hard to read stories like these without being cynical.

  10. Yeah... by EABird · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe they should outlaw tractor-trailer rigs. That will fix this little problem.

  11. If I had only had the chance... by Perseid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kids these days are awfully lucky. When I was a kid, we actually got blamed for what we did. If I'd had excuses like this childhood would have been a hell of a lot more fun.

    1. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before you knee-jerk at this one, remember that it is the prosecutor who is explaining their actions here. They are being prosecuted for their crime. So yes, they are being blamed. However, it is in society's interests to look at their influences as well as sending them to jail. Media has influence. You cannot make a game that will be played by children, and hope that children will not be affected. That is not how children work.

    2. Re:If I had only had the chance... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      The game was not meant to be played by children.

      Furthermore, although I made some bad choices when I was a teenager, I never blamed those choices on the music I listened to, the games I played, or the movies I watched. They were mine to make, and even in the case of GTA life imitates art, in that at the end of their shooting spree they did get busted and they are going to spend some time behind bars (well, juvenile detention, but then they are under age).

      Children have minds, they can make decisions for themselves, especially in their teenage years. I swear I missed the mission in GTA that told me to go out and snipe the sides of tractor-trailer rigs, though, and I think that mission would've been pretty easy since the only rigs I remember seeing were stationary.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:If I had only had the chance... by fireduck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Valid point. Children are influenced by their surroundings. Media, friends, teachers, parents. In the case of a child with a gun shooting at a vehicle, it's obvious the parent's did not do enough to either a) keep the gun out of the child's hands, or b) teach the child how to use the gun responsibly.

      You cannot make a game that will be played by children, and hope that children will not be affected. That is not how children work.
      And, you cannot have a child and hope that child will not be influenced by you. That is not how children work. I think that's a more important point.
    4. Re:If I had only had the chance... by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Informative

      First, these 'children' shouldn't have been playing GTA3. It was designed for a mature audience.

      Second, which should make point 1 moot: Did you watch Bowling For Columbine? If you haven't, I strongly suggest you do before you start deciding what actually influences children to do these things.

      Kids are smart, way smarter than they are given credit for. Kids read every day how 'Violent Video Games Cause Children To Do Horrible Things'.
      Gee, I wonder why when called on their actions they spout out: 'Hey, the video game influenced me'.

      Here's some more food for thought: How many people watched full coverage of the event, guns, blood, wreakage, bullets and all on TV? How many children did too? How many events like this are children exposed to every day through various media outlets? (I'm talking real news events here people, not imaginary television shows and the like, but blood and guts live at 6:00!)

      Mull it over if you will...

      --
      No Comment.
    5. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      The designers knew exactly who would be playing this game: children.

      Children have minds, yes, and that is why these teenagers are responsible for this incident. That does not mean that the manner in which they were raised is meaningless. Influences matter.

    6. Re:If I had only had the chance... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      The designers knew exactly who would be playing this game: children.

      Bullshit. The majority of the people playing games today are over 18. The primary target audience for the console on which the GTA games were first released is the 18-25 market, and this is where it's had it's most success. Most of the multi-million selling games in the US have been targeted and sold to this market primarily, or an extremely broad market (ie The Sims).

      Never mind, I must be a psycho, after all, I played Doom and Wolfenstein 3D when I was 12, and watched Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm St. movies when I was the same age. Then again, my parents knew I wasn't going to do something stupid and blame it on the movies and games, too, or they wouldn't have rented those movies for me or bought those games in the first place.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, they would have had to be in denial to think that GTA wouldn't be played by a large number of kids -- even if it is 'targeted' at the 18-25 market. 'Targeting' doesn't matter nearly so much as the fact of who is actually playing it.

    8. Re:If I had only had the chance... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      How is watching a 'documentary' that has as much credibility as an Ann Coulter hardback or an hour of Rush Limbaugh going to help us understand what influences children??

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    9. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      So, are you saying we should stop producing any violent games "because a kid might play it"? Isn't that going overboard? It's really the parents' responsibility to teach kids right and wrong.

    10. Re:If I had only had the chance... by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ah, so nothing should ever be made if there is any chance that it is not suitable for children, because they _might_ show interest, and they _might_ get their hands on it.

      Hm, no adult games, no mature television and movies, no mature music or books, including porn.
      Ah, no more cars either, some kid might try to drive one. And no guns, or alcohol.

      I've got it, lets let Fisher Price have sole controle over every single available consumable on this planet!

      Oh, well, I guess we could take responsibility for our own children and actions if you think that might work too.

      Slippery slope my friend, slippery slope.

      --
      No Comment.
    11. Re:If I had only had the chance... by pompousjerk · · Score: 1

      You need to unbold parents. It has been shown that the only *positive* *direct* contribution parents make to behavior is genetic--although it is possible for parents to fuck up their kids via neglect and abuse. (My parents are conservative fundamentalist Christians. Despite their efforts, I'm a moderate humanist/atheist. Go from there.)

      The other big contribution to behavior is the child's peers, so maybe we should look at who they were hanging out with.

      I would suggest you read this little blurb (or better yet, get the book): The blank slate.

    12. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      I believe that it is an immoral thing to create such a violent video game for exactly that reason. The designers should certainly be censured as immoral. I am not calling for government action, rather I am saying that we as a society should express clear standards of right and wrong. It should be clear to everyone what is and is not socially acceptable. Parental standards are where it starts, of course, but parents should be buttressed by the society they live in, not attacked by it. I would even go so far as to say that the real problems with are society today are linked to the fact that it is no longer completely organized around the task of raising children.

    13. Re:If I had only had the chance... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Say what?

      You either didn't watch it, or you ARE the point being made.

      --
      No Comment.
    14. Re:If I had only had the chance... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, they would have had to be in denial to think that GTA wouldn't be played by a large number of kids -- even if it is 'targeted' at the 18-25 market.

      If GTA is being played by a large number of kids, then someone has to ask why they're being allowed to play it. My parents would've been perfectly fine with me playing GTA, but that's because they knew I was raised to know right from wrong, and a game from real life. If I had had problems discerning the two selections, they would've done whatever they could to help me before letting an M-rated game or an R-rated movie anywhere near me.

      The key is that the ages are suggested, and people are supposed to be able to make choices for themselves as to whether or not they or their children should be exposed to the material. If a 10 year old kid has enough money to buy GTA in the first place without his parents around, then you have to wonder why he has that much money in the first place, and how he got to the place he bought it. My parents certainly didn't let me go far enough away from the house when I was a kid to get to any place where I could buy something even if I had enough money to do so.

      Now if a 16 year old with a regular part-time job doesn't know right from wrong and reality from a video game, how are they holding a job in the first place? and how did they manage not to kill anyone before they were 16?

      Let's go back to blaming Ozzy, Metallica, and Marilyn Manson for our kids killing themselves. Never mind, I've got some Soul Calibur 2 to play, and I think my girlfriend's mother wants her to take her 9 year old brother to see Freddy vs Jason again.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    15. Re:If I had only had the chance... by recursiv · · Score: 1
      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    16. Re:If I had only had the chance... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Obviously, there's a very large part (a few million people) that don't agree with you, whether it's because they're immoral people, or because they believe there's a difference between killing people in a console/PC game and killing real people.

      I'm not raising children of my own, so any society organized around raising children has no place for me anyway. If I choose to raise children, I don't need society's 'help' to do so. Society's choice to allow or not allow entertainment for adults only affects my raising children in that I need to make sure they understand the real world before they have to partake in it. GTA's existance is not an attack on parents, it is entertainment for adults, some of whom may be parents.

      If I own a gun, I lock it up. If I own porn, I generally try to keep it where my kids will not find it (or lock it up with the gun). If I own R-rated movies and M-rated games and feel my children are not ready for them, then I lock them up, and only view/play them when my children are not around or when they're in bed.

      I couldn't touch my family's computer without asking first, and most of the time it was in a very visible part of the house. I grew up with very large stretches of my childhood marred by being restricted from watching television, and my parents were perfectly capable of preventing me from even watching it, let alone watching specific things, without having to resort to locking me in my bedroom (and come to think of it, when I was a teenager sending me to my room would've been a pretty sad joke, although I did only have a 15" TV until I was in my 20s).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    17. Re:If I had only had the chance... by digeratus · · Score: 1

      OK. But all of your statements there are based on the first one:

      I believe that it is an immoral thing to create such a violent video game

      You give no reason for your belief of this. Do you really think that kids are that stupid that they will actually kill because of a video game? Do you think that the act of killing never once went through their mind before playing the game?

      I personally feel that these kids are doing this because of boredom. Sure, it might not start with killing people, or shooting cars. In this sense, games like this will keep kids off the streets killing people.

      From personal experience, these games are entirely seperate to these crimes. I play GTA. I play the original Doom. I play Quake III. etc. I don't ever recall killing someone, or even considering it.

      If these kids are stupid enough to kill because of a video game, then stupidity is the problem.

      That's my view, take it or leave it :|

    18. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      Videogames influence people. And some videogames are made to make kids kill. Okay -- that was a little bit of a joke -- but the point is that entertainment influences people. And that influence is especially felt by the young. Socrates' discussion of music in the Republic was not a silly argument.

    19. Re:If I had only had the chance... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      That is true, never said it was.
      However, can only documentaries make valid points?

      The article you point to is interesting...mostly in that someone went to a LOT of work to try to discredit the entire piece of work. And why? If it was obviously total BS, nobody would care and there would be no point in discrediting it. In other words, the movie obviously hit too close to home for somebody.

      Now, try to discredit the final scene, the interview with Charleston Heston. Is somebody going to tell me that that was edited together fraudulently? Good job if it was. The fact is that when he was pressed with the facts presented to him, he couldn't handle it. What that means? Well, Moore left you to make your own conclusions didn't he?

      Something that the discrediters of Bowling For Columbine fail to see as well is that Moore never drew any direct conclusions for the viewer, he left that up to the viewer entirely. How many gun-lovers start spewing crap about how it's not the fault of guns and that gun control isn't the solution as soon as this movie is brought up? Yeah, and the part where Moore says just that is conveniently ignored. THAT WASN'T THE CONCLUSION TO BE DRAWN FROM THIS MOVIE!

      I'm Canadian. He compared gun numbers, gun legislation, gun control laws, ammo and firearm accessability etc etc etc between the US and Canada as well as other countries. He called Canadians a bunch of gun lovers, at least as bad as our american counterparts. But, he then went on to state that per capita, there are WAY more gun deaths in the US every year than in ANY other country in the world. He then goes on to present other possibilities...like say the media perchance?

      Anyways, the point I'm trying to make is that the people that get the most up in arms about things like this are usually the ones it hits closest to home with.

      --
      No Comment.
    20. Re:If I had only had the chance... by IM6100 · · Score: 1

      If it was obviously total BS, nobody would care and there would be no point in discrediting it.

      No. 'Bowling' is a highly effective piece of propadanda. In many regards a vicious pack of lies. Why is it not obvious why people would work vigorously to discredit it?

      --
      A Good Intro to NetBS
    21. Re:If I had only had the chance... by GeckoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OK then, and what agenda is this propaganda attempting to promote?

      What is the point of the 'vicious pack of lies'?

      Look, if I called you an asshole (I'm not, just an example...bear with...), who would care? Well, there are 2 answers:

      1: If you aren't actually an asshole, nobody would care. You wouldn't give a damned because I'm absolutely nobody and you're sound in the fact that you aren't actually an asshole so you would just ignore it.

      2: If you are actually an asshole, well then nobody except for you would care. Nobody else would care because you and I are both nobody. But, chances are very good that a statement that hits so close to home would result in a fairly animated response at a minimum wouldn't it?

      Now you have to apply this example to Bowling For Columbine, and then answer the following questions in order: (You cannot legitimately answer b without first answering a):
      a) What are people getting pissed off about?
      b) Why are people getting pissed off about it?

      Can you do that?
      If so, please do and then we can continue this conversation.

      If not, please, don't bother responding.

      --
      No Comment.
    22. Re:If I had only had the chance... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Now, try to discredit the final scene, the interview with Charleston Heston. Is somebody going to tell me that that was edited together fraudulently? Good job if it was. The fact is that when he was pressed with the facts presented to him, he couldn't handle it. What that means? Well, Moore left you to make your own conclusions didn't he?

      The site did make some statements regarding that last interview, maybe you should re-read it. Personally, I'm thinking of going back and taking another look at the movie to see if I can see it for myself (ie the clock showing ~20 minutes pass in an interview that takes 5 minutes on film). Not to mention the point of the movie starting out making points in one direction and then turning around in the end to make a completely different point.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    23. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      I've got it, lets let Fisher Price have sole controle over every single available consumable on this planet!

      Technically, you can kill someone with a Fisher Price playset... just bludgeon them over the head 8 or 9 thousand times, and they'll drop like a rock. We should also do away with pencils, pens, and anything that weighs over 4 ounces. Water is too hazardous to keep around, since you could theoretically drown in 2 inches of water in the bottom of a bucket. Paper isn't safe either, since you could bleed to death if you get 50,000 paper cuts. In fact, you could jab yourself in the eye repeatedly with your favorite finger (any finger will do) and eventually hit your brain, and probably kill yourself... so we better lop off our fingers too. Our feet pose a significant hazard, since we could walk into something we can't protect ourselves from, like the ocean, or off a cliff, or maybe even INTO REAL LIFE.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    24. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      I am saying that we as a society should express clear standards of right and wrong.

      Fine. Go ahead. Don't buy or play their games. The rest of the real world will, if they want to.

      I would even go so far as to say that the real problems with are society today are linked to the fact that it is no longer completely organized around the task of raising children.

      Since when has this planet revolved around children? The last I knew, to get a job, you couldn't be a child. When you're a child, you can't vote, drink, drive, or do anything worth while in life. The world has NEVER revolved around children, and shouldn't start now. If we create little whiney children who expect the world to revolve around them, in 20 years we get little whiney adults who expect the world to revolve around them.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    25. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Videogames influence people.

      Are you sure that people don't influence videogames? I seem to remember a time not so long ago when video games weren't around, yet people were everywhere. In fact, even 100 years ago, there weren't any video games, television shows, or movies to blame when children went bad. What video game did Lizzie Borden play to make her split open her parents' heads with an ax? I don't seem to remember hearing how she played Half-Life, or saw Scarface and that made her do it...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    26. Re:If I had only had the chance... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Then the first thing will be to establish a censorship of the writers of fiction, and let the censors receive any tale of fiction which is good, and reject the bad; and we will desire mothers and nurses to tell their children the authorised ones only. Let them fashion the mind with such tales, even more fondly than they mould the body with their hands; but most of those which are now in use must be discarded.

      Of what tales are you speaking? he said.

      You may find a model of the lesser in the greater, I said; for they are necessarily of the same type, and there is the same spirit in both of them.

      Very likely, he replied; but I do not as yet know what you would term the greater.

      Those, I said, which are narrated by Homer and Hesiod, and the rest of the poets, who have ever been the great story-tellers of mankind.

      But which stories do you mean, he said; and what fault do you find with them?

      A fault which is most serious, I said; the fault of telling a lie, and, what is more, a bad lie.

      But when is this fault committed?

      Whenever an erroneous representation is made of the nature of gods and heroes,--as when a painter paints a portrait not having the shadow of a likeness to the original.


      (this is one of the earliest points on music in The Republic, after the discussion lumps music together with literature and most other parts of what we consider art today)

      But we all must remember two things:
      1) Plato was describing in the Republic his view of a perfect society, one which was built from the very beginning to be self-sufficient and was meant to raise it's children (every one, women included) to be warriors for the defense of the society. Every other job was put in place only to provide for that function, and every law as well. Furthermore, the entire construction of the Republic was simply for the purpose of finding the truth of Justice in an example of the perfect Republic.

      2) At the time of Plato the basic idea of logic and the methods of logical discussion were unknown, as were many other things that we take for granted (such as fractions and the idea of the number 0). Many of Plato's dialogues (The Republic included) contain a great deal of logical fallacy because of this.

      Beyond those points, Socrates himself was executed for corrupting the youth, probably before Plato wrote the Republic.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    27. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

      And they were perfectly right to do it, too. He was corrupting the youth.

      Your point 2 will have to be buttressed by something quite a bit stronger than "frations and the idea of the number 0" before I will admit it though. Point 1 misses the point of why the Republic has so much to teach us today.

    28. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      You need to unbold parents. It has been shown that the only *positive* *direct* contribution parents make to behavior is genetic--although it is possible for parents to fuck up their kids via neglect and abuse. (My parents are conservative fundamentalist Christians. Despite their efforts, I'm a moderate humanist/atheist. Go from there.)

      And how many people have you murdered? Go from there...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    29. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      The article you point to is interesting...mostly in that someone went to a LOT of work to try to discredit the entire piece of work. And why? If it was obviously total BS, nobody would care and there would be no point in discrediting it. In other words, the movie obviously hit too close to home for somebody.

      You're a stupid, ignorant, idealist piece of crap that believes anything anti-American as long as it agrees with whatever inane babble you're spewing at the moment. What? You're arguing? I must be right, otherwise you wouldn't be arguing. I must have hit too close to home.

      Something that the discrediters of Bowling For Columbine fail to see as well is that Moore never drew any direct conclusions for the viewer, he left that up to the viewer entirely.

      So if I told you that out of 100,000 people that own guns, only 1 or 2 of them ever commit a crime with those guns, and I interview the other 90,000 or so to give evidence, what conclusion would you come up with?

      Yeah, and the part where Moore says just that is conveniently ignored.

      Then why are YOU bringing it up? Is there a point somewhere in the future, or are you just babbling about some stupid movie from some no-name director who is only known in the world because he HATES AMERICA and everything we stand for?

      Anyways, the point I'm trying to make is that the people that get the most up in arms about things like this are usually the ones it hits closest to home with.

      Ah, the point. I was starting to doubt it existed...

      Disclaimer: I do not own a gun. I have never owned a gun. I will purchase a gun very shortly, while it's still legal. And, if my home is ever burglarized, I will shoot the entire clip into the mother fucker, and one in the head, just to make sure he's not coming back.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    30. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      a) What are people getting pissed off about?
      b) Why are people getting pissed off about it?


      People are getting pissed off because Michael Moore hates everything in America, and does everything he can to paint the United States in a bad light. Then, he markets a "documentary" full of anti-capitalist notions to a generation full of people that don't know any better. People are pissed because he's trying to brainwash a lot of people into believing that the United States is the source of everything evil. It doesn't matter how comfortable I am with the fact that this is incorrect. It doesn't matter how comfortable Michael Moore is with it either. Hitler said that the Jews were the source of all Germany's problems. Was he right? Was he wrong? Before he took action to exterminate them, who would have cared, right? I mean, by your logic, the Jews knew it wasn't true, so they wouldn't have cared. The Nazis didn't know it wasn't true... and there's where the problem started. Moore is creating propaganda designed to overthrow the United States government (maybe not today or tomorrow, but if he had his way .......) and you're asking why people are getting pissed off? Man, you're deluded....

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    31. Re:If I had only had the chance... by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I see you got my point, congradulations, here's a cookie.

      --
      No Comment.
    32. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People are pissed because he's trying to brainwash a lot of people into believing that the United States is the source of everything evil. "

      If we are not, then we are doing a damn good job looking like we are.

    33. Re:If I had only had the chance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I believe that it is an immoral thing to create such a violent video game for exactly that reason.

      And I believe it is immoral to make guns since they obviously can fall into the hands of children. All guns should be banned because of this.

    34. Re:If I had only had the chance... by commander+salamander · · Score: 1


      I've got it, lets let Fisher Price have sole controle over every single available consumable on this planet!


      Too late, they've already gotten hold of the Windows XP UI!

      --
      Is this rock and roll, or a form of state control?
  12. Shooting at the sides of trucks huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone on the prosecution side even played the game, or know anyone that has played the game? There are no tractor/trailers in either GTA3 or GTA:Vice City. There are tractors, but they don't have trailers attached to them.

    There are PARKED trailers in places in vice city, but they are static objects and can't be moved.

    1. Re:Shooting at the sides of trucks huh? by Jayjr · · Score: 1

      that also makes you wonder what other mental problems these kisd have if they are imagining tractor trailors in a game that obviously doesnt have them.

    2. Re:Shooting at the sides of trucks huh? by Alkaiser · · Score: 1

      Yeah...I don't even remember seeing tractor trailers in GTA, GTA 2, and GTA: London...

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    3. Re:Shooting at the sides of trucks huh? by xSauronx · · Score: 1
      theres the problem

      they practice in a game at hitting sitting targets

      and then miss in the real world because the truck is moving

      solution? make the gta tractor trailors move...

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  13. even more important thing about this article... by boomerny · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was unaware that Tennessee was even a state still. Damn NY public schools.

    1. Re:even more important thing about this article... by Thedalek · · Score: 1

      Strangely, I almost wonder if you're joking. Californians and New Yorkers almost seem to forget that there -are- 48 other states.

      --
      Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    2. Re:even more important thing about this article... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      That's because California doesn't really need 49 other states to exist, and people in New York City just aren't aware that there's even a state called New York, let alone other states.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:even more important thing about this article... by pmz · · Score: 1

      I was unaware that Tennessee was even a state still.

      Yes, Tennesee, Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina are still states. And, living there is loads of fun! Have you ever seen Deliverance? Ahh, those were the days...

    4. Re:even more important thing about this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas could easily go it alone too. It happens to be the second most populous state. Oh, and it has its own energy grid, unlike those poor misguided New Yorkers. And hasn't been fucked over by energy companies like California.

    5. Re:even more important thing about this article... by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      I agree. California doesn't need the other states... It's grown into its own skin. I say we cut it off into a separate nation, and see how things go. It could be the Grand Democratic Experiment! Just let the Democrats and Liberals of San Francisco have their way with the state, and see how things work out for them... As long as the federal government doesn't raise MY taxes to pay for THEIR fuck-ups when THEY need a bail-out.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    6. Re:even more important thing about this article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it was doing the fucking, Texas should be executed for that.

  14. yeah and i decided to emulate three musketeers.. by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Funny

    and went on a fencing spree into the city and also had sex with anything i saw..

    seriously, geez...

    i don't remember shooting tractor rigs in gta though..

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  15. So? by jarran · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the sad facts are, idiots and psychos will always find something bad to emulate. If there were no games, they would been inspired to shoot at people by a movie. If there were no movies, they would have been inspired by the Washington sniper, or the US government.

    If someone doesn't know the difference between fantasy and reality then obviously playing computer games and watching TV could cause them to do something bad. But the problem is with them, not with the game or film.

    1. Re:So? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      You have a good point, but you infer that people are inherently idiots or psychos which isn't always the case.

      You hit on the point that these people don't know the difference between fantasy and reality, which is close.

      In my opinion though, the problem is that reality, especially the one that the media stuffs down our throat whether we like it or not, is quite often way more brutal and horrific than fantasy. So then how do you teach someone the difference between a TV show where someone is murdered, and a news blip of someone who was murdered? Is our fantasy really fantasy, or does it just emulate reality? And if so, how do you distinguish the difference?

      Thus, I believe very strongly that the solution is not better understanding of fantasy vs reality, but rather right vs wrong. Once a proper understanding of right vs wrong is achieved, then and only then can fantasy vs reality be understood.

      If these kids truly understood that using guns in such a way could lead to the death of a human being, and that they understood this to be a bad thing...they wouldn't likely have done it.

      --
      No Comment.
    2. Re:So? by isorox · · Score: 0

      They should have said they were "showing our patriotic spirit by our brave troops in Iraq. God Bless America!" - they'd get off, and probably get a medal or something

    3. Re:So? by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Is our fantasy really fantasy, or does it just emulate reality? And if so, how do you distinguish the difference?

      Well, my reality isn't fantasy. If it were, I'd be having sex with Britney Spears right about now.

      I distinguish reality and fantasy by looking at it. If there's a box around it, and that box has buttons, and knobs, and looks kinda flat when you step to one side or the other, I know it's a television, and it's not MY reality. MY reality doesn't have a box, or buttons or knobs, and when I step to the side, I see a different angle on the same thing. So, if I was holding a gun, and I was pointing it at someone, if there isn't a box cutting off my view of my arm, then I know it's reality, and I know better than to pull the trigger. Apparently, some people just aren't that intelligent.

      If these kids truly understood that using guns in such a way could lead to the death of a human being, and that they understood this to be a bad thing...they wouldn't likely have done it.

      When I was a kid, I caught this bird one time... he was a little baby, and he was pretty cute. Know what I did? Being the evil little bastard that I am, I gouged his eye out, then killed him. I knew it wasn't a good thing to do. I didn't care. Would I have done it to a person? No. Why? Not because I knew it was bad... I wouldn't do it because I know it's wrong, AND I know I'll probably get caught. If I knew I wouldn't get caught, there's a good number of people I'd off.

      Besides that, my view is that stupid people exist, and should be punished for whatever stupid actions they make. Your view is that people are inherently good and will make the proper choice when they have a choice. In my view, anarchy is bad because people need rules and regulations (and punishments). In your view, anarchy would, logically, be perfectly acceptable, since people automatically are good and peace-loving.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    4. Re:So? by GeckoX · · Score: 1
      Nice that you know my view on life so well, even better than I do apparently. We're talking about children here, not grown adults. We're talking about what it takes for children to grow up to be good and peace-loving. It would be quite easy to raise all our children to be murderers and thieves and the like...they are impressionable...they are blank slates. Yes, stupid people exist. But, intelligence doesn't mean much if it's not applied appropriately. Many of the most vicious killers of all time have been some of the most intelligent people of all time...something went wrong. Lets maybe try working on that.
      If I knew I wouldn't get caught, there's a good number of people I'd off.
      Gee, that's real warm and comforting. You do realize that you have just thrown yourself in the group of 'stupid people that should be punished for whatever stupid actions they make' that you denounce so well. You have just stated that you can't make decisions based on good morals, but rather that your decisions are dictated by the punishments that society would invoke upon you were you to act out in ways such as this. How's about some self control. You're deffinately an example to live by. And yes, that was meant to be facetious and sarcastic, deservedly so.
      --
      No Comment.
    5. Re:So? by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      The main difference between your views and my views is that I want people to have a choice on what they can do. They can either emulate whatever game they play and shoot someone, or they can not emulate the game... or they can not play the game at all. You want to deny people that choice, and thus, defeat the purpose of freedom. If there are never any choices, then people obviously aren't free to make their own choices. You want to deny people that freedom by denying developers the freedom to explore their creativity. If you deny the general public the freedom of choice, you are, in essence, defeating capitalism entirely. So with one statement, that "developers shouldn't be allowed to make games that children might emulate", you have defeated the purpose of capitalism. People that think like that will one day destroy the United States... not that you care, because you live in the vast wasteland of Canada where nobody ever accomplishes anything of note.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    6. Re:So? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Where the fuck do you get your ideas about my point of view from?

      You continuously ignore my actual comments and insist on put words in my mouth, numerous times contradicting yourself just to continue the argument.

      Fuck you troll.

      --
      No Comment.
    7. Re:So? by Matrix272 · · Score: 1

      Well what the fuck is the matter with you? You're the one sitting there saying that you don't want developers making games that little kids MIGHT, BY CHANCE, AT SOME POINT, try to recreate in real life, spouting all kinds of bullshit about reality and fantasy. The fact is that you can't make up your own damn mind. You wanna whine and complain that someone died because a little idiotic shithead decided to pull the trigger, then blame some game he played. So sorry, but MILLIONS of people have played Grand Theft Auto, and only ONE death causes headlines. Cry me a fucking river. No shit I've been contradicting myself... because I'm fucking with your mind, dipshit. You want facts that don't contradict anything? OK, here we go:

      Fact 1: You're obviously an idiot who thinks that anything that offends someone, or has the slightest hint of danger should be regulated by some all-knowing, all-powerful father-figure. You've admitted as much.

      Fact 2: Grand Theft Auto has sold millions of copies, and to my knowledge, not even 10 people have died from people emulating it. The problem isn't the game, or the developers, or the people in the country. It's the pathetic 0.00001% of people that can't / don't / won't take responsibility for their own actions. They just want to blame someone else... just like you.

      Fact 3: No amount of babbling about blame, regulations, or morality can change the fact that one person is dead, and the kids that killed that guy are seriously fucked up in the head. Kill the children (eye for an eye and all that) and get on with life.

      Dipshit.

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    8. Re:So? by GeckoX · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Look Fuckwit, if you can quote me as to where I ever even hinted that developers shouldn't make games like GTA Vice City, then you win. (BTW, wanna put money on this? I could stand some free cash if you're up for it)

      I never ever said that at all you fucktard, why don't you fucking wake up and READ.

      Sorry but you loose.
      Fuck, you tool.

      --
      No Comment.
  16. I remember by jimius · · Score: 1

    I remember that they said GTA had nothing to do with it. But then their lawyer probly fixed that, plea for insanity, blame the game.

    The game is not to blame, these @#holes are and their parents for not looking after them.
    The answer is so simple, why doesn't anyone with power see it?

  17. rediculous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i swear..the judge should drag these kids parents out and sacrifice them to demon gods..
    Reasons?:

    1) Letting you kids play a game they shouldnt
    2) Letting you kids play with a gun
    3) Not watching what teh f*** your kids are doing
    4) Being retarted.

    For god sakes..parents out there..take some bloody responsibility and watch your kids.

  18. - BLAME THE PARENTS - by sniser2 · · Score: 1

    It's not so important that they blamed it on GTA - there are other games, and then there are gpong to be Half-Life 2 mods.. what is important is that kids get BORED and shoot at moving vehicles..

  19. Re: game physics != real world physics by ip_vjl · · Score: 1
    They must not play many FPS's either if they cant hit the broad side of a truck without hitting a person in another car ...


    Yes. Because we all know that game physics and real life physics are identical.

    If there's anything that our office sessions of Quake II taught me, it's that the best way to move about in any situation is to constantly run while incessantly jumping like a rabbit 6 feet in the air.

    I don't wan't to blame the motivation on the game either, I think it's just a cheap excuse ... but to claim that game players should be better with a *real* gun doesn't really hold up.
  20. Do we really believe in personal responsibility? by pudge_lightyear · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok... let's be frank. I believe in Personal responsibility. If I do something dumb, I'm supposed to pay. I believe that if I smoke, I get cancer, I died, I asked for it... but let's assume for a minute that the companies should live under the same rule.

    For smoking, this means the following. The fabric industry is the cause of a very small amount of publicly spent medical costs per year. The smoking industry is (indirectly) the cause of the majority of medical expenses per year. However, both the fabric and smoking industries pay the same amount of taxes (at least before the suits). Is this responsible? I'm not sure where I fall on this because I'm still trying to figure out my stance.

    On an individual level. Say, I never work out, so I'm fat. I get so fat that I can't work, so I live on welfare. And I completely live off of the guy who takes care of himself and works hard. Is this responsible?

    I think I've decided that the smoking industry is the fat guy who doesn't work. I think the same thing about the piece of the porn industry that the justice dept is sueing right now. And truthfully, I think the same thing about Rockstar.

    Nintendo and Super Mario cause very little aggression. The one guy's post about mario inspiring violence was marked funny because you never hear about someone killing someone else with a hammer they can't keep from bouncing and playing a tune. However, this is not the first violent act performed because of (at least) some relationship to video games. It's very difficult to argue that these things have absolutely no effect on you. If you see violence all of the time, it's difficult to argue that it has no effect. If you take part in violence all of the time (real or unreal), it's difficult to argue that it has little effect.

    All that being said, Rockstar and Nintendo pay the same amount and are recognized as equals. Is that responsible?

  21. countdown by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

    And anti-videogame attourny Jack Thompson rears his ugly head in 5...4...3...2...

    --
    http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
  22. excuses suck by britrock · · Score: 1

    "they were mimicking the video game by trying to hit the sides of passing trucks"

    Lets think about this quote... The trucks in GTA don't have trailers! Dumb shits.

    1. Re:excuses suck by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that this point has brought up about ten previous times, it's also worth nothing that the anti-videogame nuts don't care whether there are trailers or not. You are capable of shooting vehicles in GTA3 and that is what the kids were emulating. Bringing up the point that there weren't rigs with trailers attached (because actually there were both rigs and trailers, they just weren't attached) only gives creedance to the argument that the videogame is to blame. Basically, they're saying this game has caused Action Y and you respond, "Action Y isn't in that game!" instead of saying, "Bad parenting and sheer willfull malice causes Action Y, not some video game!"

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:excuses suck by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      In logic
      if Z causes Y
      !Z = !Y
      therefore if Y but !Z, then Z did not cause Y

      Therefore, since there are no tractor-trailer rigs driving down the streets of GTA and the kids claimed that they were shooting at tractor-trailer rigs 'like they did in GTA', then the kids are full of shit (or whoever claims it), and the action they claimed caused it did not cause it.

      Whether or not the game caused it can not be determined by a logic test, but whether or not what they said was the cause can be, because they made a statement that is provably false.

      Y causes Z
      !Y = !Z
      X causes Z
      is not logical, because X was not introduced before hand.

      Of course, when X = bad parenting, W = sheer willfull malice, and Z is the shooting
      X & W = Z
      is also false because it's perfectly possible for
      !X & W = Z

      The malice is what caused the crime. Bad parenting enabled it at some point by giving them access to the gun without 'thou shalt not kill' morality (or any morality that says 'dont shoot at passing cars').

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:excuses suck by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1

      my point was that shooting at cars isn't that different from shooting at tractor trailers.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    4. Re:excuses suck by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with you there, but if the kids (or their lawyers) say they 'were just shooting at tractor-trailers like they did in GTA', then the kids were clearly misinformed about what could be done in GTA in the first place. They obviously did not shoot at tractor-trailers in GTA, and therefore were either not emulating what they did in GTA or lied (by saying they were shooting at tractor-trailers either in real life or in the game).

      My guess is that someone thought it would look better to say they were shooting at the sides of tractor-trailers instead of shooting at cars, because you've got to admit that there's a much smaller likelihood of hurting anyone directly by shooting at the sides of tractor-trailers. Neither of the people that were shot appear to have actually been in tractor-trailers, either, from the accounts given in the two articles. Then again, they did manage to only hit two people while firing 'up to 25 shots', which means either their aim is atrocious or they weren't trying to shoot people (then again, with the average freeway speed in most areas being ~70-80 mph, it's not that amazing that they missed so many times even if they were trying to shoot people).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    5. Re:excuses suck by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0

      and which is more likely of the two: that the kids didn't actually know what gta was like or that somewhere between the incident and slashdot, someone misspoke? my guess is that it was the latter. now, (and getting back to what i was originally going for), responding to the prosecutor's statement that his version of what takes place in the game is factually wrong is a case of getting wrapped up in the details when the real issue is that video games don't cause kids to do fucked-up shit. if people respond by saying that the video game obviously didn't cause it because that's not what took place in the game, the bigger fact that video games, like movies and television, play very minor roles in inspiring crime. an individual with the inclination to commit crime, is going to do so.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    6. Re:excuses suck by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I agree on the latter point (that entertainment plays a very minor role), and that the prosecutor most likely had no clue wtf he was talking about (or misspoke).

      However, it still remains that the excuse is bs simply by the fact that what was said about the game was incorrect.

      Then again, blaming Columbine on Doom seemed rather stupid when most people hadn't played Doom in several years, and much more 'realistic' games had come out since.

      People believe whatever they want to believe for the most part, and the people that spend more time lobbying against games than actually putting the responsibility on the people that commit the crimes, and those that raise their children unsupervised, are still going to believe that they were 'shooting at tractor-trailers like they did in GTA', even though they didn't shoot anyone that was in a tractor-trailer either in real life or in the game. Never mind that if you did shoot someone in a car in real life, the car would either just get closer to exploding or would stop and spill out the dead body of the headshot driver. Oh, or the driver would stop the car and get out and run away, giving you the chance to shoot them outside their vehicle.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  23. This is absurd... by HaloZero · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Point 1) There are No Tractor-Trailers on the roads, for shooting in either Grand Theft Auto III or Grand Theft Auto Vice City. Looking into previous revisions of the game, which don't have the aforementioned 'Sniper Mode', the closest you can get to a Tractor Trailer is a snub-nosed fuel tanker truck.

    Point 2) Where did they get the gun? Notice how everyone is 100% ready to jump on the video game... my question... WHERE THE FUCK DID THEY GET THE GUN? I mean, of course the gun isn't dangerous. No way. Guns never kill people. That's why cops and 'sportsmen' carry around RAZOR SHARP DVDs.

    It's fucking obscene. I can't wait to see what happens to such good titles (and yes, you have to admit, even if you hate the content with a passion, the games are done really well..)

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:This is absurd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In "those" areas, guns around the house are as common as furniture (often they double as furniture). It's not unusual for Junior to have a .22 slung in the corner for plinking cans or shooting cats.

    2. Re:This is absurd... by bitrott · · Score: 1

      There are large eight-wheel semis. Also known as tractor trailers.

    3. Re:This is absurd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tractor

      trailer.

      In case you're confused, this is called a "truck" or "lorry" or "arctic" (as in "articulated vehicle").

    4. Re:This is absurd... by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      That's the tractor half. That's why it's called a 'Semi'.

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    5. Re:This is absurd... by GypC · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, where did they get the gun? There are literally millions of kids in the US with .22 rifles. And millions of them do nothing illegal with them every single day, and never will. Blaming a gun is just as bad as blaming a videogame.

    6. Re:This is absurd... by jemfinch · · Score: 1

      Point 2) Where did they get the gun? Notice how everyone is 100% ready to jump on the video game... my question... WHERE THE FUCK DID THEY GET THE GUN? I mean, of course the gun isn't dangerous. No way. Guns never kill people.


      Blaming the gun is as bad as blaming the video game.

      Lack or morals and/or intelligence is the real issue here.

      Jeremy
    7. Re:This is absurd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah 'cos guns weren't originally designed for KILLING PEOPLE or anything.

      If guns are so benign and not used for the purpose of harming people, why not make them shoot NERF BALLS.

      As far as I'm concerned, guns have their uses, for example, for farmers to put down animals. But they should be locked up in a safe place, and tightly regulated. Leaving them somewhere where kids can get at them should be a serious offence indeed.

    8. Re:This is absurd... by danila · · Score: 1
      Point 2) Where did they get the gun?


      My best guess is they found it somewhere on the roof or in the bushes near the undeground parking lot...
      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    9. Re:This is absurd... by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Point 2) Where did they get the gun? Notice how everyone is 100% ready to jump on the video game... my question... WHERE THE FUCK DID THEY GET THE GUN?

      Why, it was packaged with the video game, of course.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    10. Re:This is absurd... by Dog+and+Pony · · Score: 1

      Blaming the gun is as bad as blaming the video game.

      Yeah, because both were built and designed to entertain, right?

      God damn, that is so stupid. Guns have one single purpose, to kill something. Not that this is always a bad thing, it is useful for hunting, for instance.

      That doesn't mean that kids should run around with them just like that, nor should adults. Guns should only be used by people that can fucking prove they are sane and has a responsible attitude towards them.

      Giving a kid access to a gun, besides outside a shooting range under supervision, is fucking insane. Then again, "fucking insane" pretty much sums up most things in that country. Ya ever think they are gonna realize it isn't 1890 anymore and the saloon is closed?

    11. Re:This is absurd... by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Point 2) Where did they get the gun?

      Exactly. It seems like nobody is paying attention to the possibility that it might just be illegal for the kids to get hold of the gun in the first place, let alone fire it in a public place. It couldn't possibly be anyone's fault that the gun and ammunition were easily available. It couldn't possibly be anyone's fault that the kids were too stupid to realize that real people might be riding in the vehicles they were shooting at. No, blame the games makers for promoting violence...

      Oh, wait, here's another idea - maybe the kids could sue the people they shot at for being living human beings instead of animated drawings!

    12. Re:This is absurd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In the truck picture you post, the front bit with the engine where a driver can sit is a tractor. The back boxlike bit (which is designed to be separated from the front bit) is a trailer. Trailers with wheels on only one end are called semi-trailers.

      There exist what appear to be semi-trailers in GTA, but they're like buildings- shooting at them or running a vehicle into them doesn't do anything. Whatever vehicle it is just bounces off and the semi-trailer doesn't move. You can't attach one to a tractor (by tractor I mean the sort which appears suited for the purpose, like the Linerunner in game someone posted a picture of earlier or the tractor portion of the truck picture above.)

      There are no trailers in GTA, the engine can't handle the articulation.

    13. Re:This is absurd... by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Point 2) Where did they get the gun?

      It was hovering 2 feet above the ground, spinning around in a yellow sphere of course.

    14. Re:This is absurd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes, as in dog and pony show... and about with as much of a point...

    15. Re:This is absurd... by Merk · · Score: 1

      Except that games have never been known to kill anybody. Except for that, you're right. But then again, there's that minor bit about guns killing and games entertaining.

  24. can't wait till the judge hears this by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    oh - well let them go then. sorry, big misunderstanding.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
    1. Re:can't wait till the judge hears this by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      Actually it'll probably end up being that people once again start flailing their arms around and going on about how violent video games are bad for anybody. Nevermind that these kids somehow attained a freaking rifle and nobody seemed to notice until they started shooting at cars on the interstate.

      The closest thing to a tractor-trailer in GTA3 was one of the 18-wheeler cabs that drove around. IIRC there's nothing like that in Vice City.

      For about a 3 month period I did nothing but play GTA:VC after work until about 2 in the morning. Yet you don't see me going around shooting people in the face through their car windshield (which I did in the game if they rammed me on my motorcycle or something) or randomly punching people on the sidewalk as I ran from the fuzz.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  25. Get Bored - Shoot People ? by FileNotFound · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best line by far is :"I didn't want to hurt anyone"

    You got to be shitting me. You take a .22 rifle and shoot at cars...wtf are you trying to do?

    If you're shooting a rifle anywhere but at the shooting range, you're shooting to kill as far as I know.

    Even in GTA, you only ever shot to either blow up the truck or kill the driver.

    It's absurd that anyone believes their bullshit.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, the television watches YOU!
    1. Re:Get Bored - Shoot People ? by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

      "This will stick with me the rest of my life."

      Nope. Being shot in the head will stick with you for the rest of your life, which will be about a few seconds. Being shot in the hip will stick with you for the rest of your life. I hope your limp makes people laugh at you, and that in the winter months your arthritis is crippling.

      Let the punishment fit the crime.

      YAW.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    2. Re:Get Bored - Shoot People ? by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey sometimes I like to shoot cans in my backyard!

      Everybody wants to blame something else for their poor behavior. Their parents, their video games, their DNA. Who the fuck cares why you did it? Does it even matter? You try to kill people, you go directly to jail, do not pass go. Learn from your (stupid-ass dumb-shit tard-fuck) mistake, and when you get out, try not to make the same mistake again.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    3. Re:Get Bored - Shoot People ? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Ah, so you're the asshole I have to listen to blasting away in his backyard all weekend, oh how I love listening to that.

      I sure do hope your backyard is big enough that there is no possible chance of a stray bullet hitting anything not on your property, in all directions.

      I also really hope nothing ever ricochets and accidentaly hits a family member, maybe a child hiding just off to the side of your targets behind a bush out of curiosity or something.

      If not, you're at LEAST as bad as these kids, except for the fact that you're supposedly an adult.

      All because you can't be bothered to go to an actual shooting range...oh, your firearm is illegal? They don't allow automatic weapons at the one near you? No? Then what's you're fucking excuse?

      --
      No Comment.
    4. Re:Get Bored - Shoot People ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people's "backyards" are farms, you idiot. Do you know of one town or city where it's actually lawful to discharge a firearm in a real "backyard" - as in where there's other houses nearby/next door?

      Get a clue and call the cops if you don't like it you overreacting goof ball. :P

    5. Re:Get Bored - Shoot People ? by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I live on a farm you idiot.

      I fucking hate my closest neighbor, whom lives a half click away and insists on blasting away in his 'back-yard' for the better part of most weekends.

      You don't think I can hear that?
      You don't think my kids can hear that?
      You don't think my dog freaks out every single time?
      You don't think a stray bullet could possibly travel that far?

      If you want to target practice, go to a fucking range. There is absolutely NO excuse for blasting away in your 'back-yard'.

      And I don't give a DAMNED about statistics. If even a single person has ever been killed by a stray bullet by someone shooting in their backyard, which has happened alot more than once, that's too many. Or is there a number of innocent people killed by guns that is acceptable?

      Don't you dare pull fucking cancer and heart-attack rates in that, that is so fucking cowardly. Got a real excuse? Didn't think so.

      --
      No Comment.
  26. What if.. by rylin · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if I start a bunch of really sick and twisted lawsuits against major companies, and loose in court,
    can I say I was inspired by SCO and blame it on insanity and get away with it?

  27. I can't wait... by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

    I can't wait for someone to commit a war crime, and claim they were inspired by America's Army...

  28. A nudge in the right direction? by Andy+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the linked article:
    The boys wrote letters to apologize to the victims' families that were read in court Thursday.

    "I didn't want to hurt anyone," Joshua wrote. "This will stick with me the rest of my life."
    I don't think a 13-year-old would write that without prompting.

    Sure it's conceivable for a 13-year-old to have a concept of "the rest of my life", and for him to imagine the guilt he will feel over that length of time, but could that maturity and self-awareness really exist in the sort of kid who shoots at cars because he did it in a computer game?

    Methinks an adult had a hand in writing that letter.
    1. Re:A nudge in the right direction? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      A lot of kids (even as old as 13) have a much harder time conceiving that guilt and other such feelings will fade, rather than the idea of 'the rest of my life' (which, for me at 13, was about 5 years, because I didn't believe I would live past 18 at the rate I was going).

      Teenagers are quite often better writers than adults, because they have to do it on a daily basis. The most interesting writing your average adult does in a given week is a grocery list or some sort of report for work.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:A nudge in the right direction? by Recoil_42 · · Score: 1

      yeah, but no kid would ever write something like that on their own, because its full of cheese. cheesey, i say. like a giant pot o' mac and cheese. anyways... as i was saying, no kid would write that. They would say they were sorry, and they never meant to hurt anyone, blah blah; but they would never say something like "this will stay with me for the rest of my life, ive done a terrible thing." thats the last thing they want to admit, they're already in denial by simply claiming its the game's fault. Fact is, they were shooting *guns* at *people*, and they're fucking stupid not to realize what that means.

      --


      Newsie, Moderator, www.tauniverse.com
    3. Re:A nudge in the right direction? by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      I, and everyone I knew, wrote crap like that every time we sat down to write an essay for English class. It's called 'snowballing'. You add a bunch of bs that sounds good to make it look bigger than it really is.

      They're probably not in denial at all, they're just saying what people want them to say. They more than likely had to write an apology of some sort anyway, so they snowballed it because people would see 'Im sorry I shot you and that other guy' as insincere.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    4. Re:A nudge in the right direction? by heXXXen · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's what snowballing is?

      I guess I've watched Clerks too many times.

  29. where are the weapons ??? by SpiritC · · Score: 1

    im trying to immitate America's Army(or any FPS for that matter) but i can't select the weapons!!!! im tired of having to punch everyone :/
    it would be nice to at least be able to select a knife :/

    --
    Smile... tomorrow will be worse.
  30. Gys dnt kill me plz i need a wpn wtf!!! by Ayanami+Rei · · Score: 1

    Stop it f4gz!1 arghj

    --
    THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
  31. Salem by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Long ago several girls claimed their behavior was inspired by an old slave "Witch." Behold the past is present, let the "witch-hunts" begin anew.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  32. Re:Do we really believe in personal responsibility by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    games don't kill people(people have seen violence 'all the time', or heard in fireplace stories, for the past x thousand years).

    however.. guns do kill people.

    or more correctly, irresponsible behauvior with a gun kills people(where the f did they get the gun??).

    or more simple, shooting someone with a gun can/will result in death.

    where did they get the gun, why weren't they educated enough to NOT SHOOT SOMEWHERE WHERE PEOPLE ARE? the gta excuse is just an excuse(there's no trailer-tractors in it) they decided to use, stupid excuse in that too. it's like i started throwing stuff out of the window(11th floor) on people and saying donkey kong made me do it..

    videogames are in the mainstream culture, nearly everyone under 30y has played a videogame at some point in their lives, so it really doesn't surprise me that videogame players do something awful since (almost) everyone is a videogame player. you don't see romeo and juliet blamed for suicides though.. strange that.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  33. Hmm... been playing Soul Calibur 2 lately... by rufo · · Score: 1

    I now have a sudden urge to fight any green-suited Hyrulians, scantily-clad purple-sknned woman with chain swords and Elvis impersonators with a nunchuck.

    Seriously though, this is just sick. Not only that, but personally the whole "GTA made me do it!" just feels like a lame excuse. I've played through and beat GTA3, and I have absolutely no urge to run out with a sniper rifle. Nor do any of my friends who have played it.

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Hmm... been playing Soul Calibur 2 lately... by Jayjr · · Score: 1

      "I've played through and beat GTA3, and I have absolutely no urge to run out with a sniper rifle." I play GTA3 and i have the urge to play with a sniper rifle every time i hear about morons who do this stupid shit. Yet another couple people added to my "When murder becomes legal" list

  34. Yeah I had the same excuse.. by Hell+O'World · · Score: 1, Funny

    I read 'Oedipus the King' for school, and I killed dad and had sex with mom. Next semester we are reading Hamlet.

    1. Re:Yeah I had the same excuse.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well at least you'll get to talk to your dad again. To bad though about the mom thing though, I heard she's got a thing for your uncle.

  35. Speaking as a Tennesseean... by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    I find this news particularly annoying. This merely strengthens the public perception that the state is a haven for stupidity and a complete wasteland of intelligence.

    I think it should be restated that Schmutzer is not making a baseless accusation: He is merely repeating what the boys already told police.

    However, it should also be pointed out that young boys have been shooting at trucks in Tennessee for about as long as there have been trucks. I doubt this is the first instance of death, or the defendants blaming video games.

    When are we going to realize that stupidity is a disease, and get around to treating it medically?

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Speaking as a Tennesseean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hitler came up with a medical treatment for stupidity.

      Dumb ass.

      Without stupid people, who would take menial jobs?Who would form the bottom 75% that allows us to be the top 25%?

      Most importantly, without stupid people, there would never (and will never be), desktop support tech jobs.

  36. Re:Do we really believe in personal responsibility by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

    The smoking industry is (indirectly) the cause of the majority of medical expenses per year. However, both the fabric and smoking industries pay the same amount of taxes (at least before the suits). Is this responsible? I'm not sure where I fall on this because I'm still trying to figure out my stance.

    Smokers pay a great deal in taxes to be smokers. The cost of a pack of cigarettes in New York or California is anywhere from 2-3 times the cost of a pack of cigarettes in Virginia, due almost entirely to state taxes on each pack (California makes far more money off the sale of a pack of cigarettes than the tobacco company that produces that pack of cigarettes).

    I had sword fights with my friends when I was a kid because we all watched He-Man and Conan the Barbarian, but none of us went out and got a real sword or a kitchen knife to do it, we used plastic swords and cardboard tubes. We played with toy guns, not real guns. As we got older, we played multiplayer online games instead of running around the streets scaring the neighbors when we played laser tag at nite (in other news, a local kid got shot by a cop when he was playing laser tag, but that was years ago, someone decided we had to have bright colours on our guns because cops are too stupid to see the difference between a laser tag gun and a real gun).

    --
    -PainKilleR-[CE]
  37. A culture of no accountability? by pmz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Personal responsibility and accountability is perhaps the most important thing that people can teach their kids. However, it seems that popular culture is increasing making it appear that people are rewarded for lying, cheating, killing, bribery, getting something for no effort, etc. Take Enron, WorldCom, the current Republican administration, reality television, nationalized health care proposals, Grand Theft Auto (to be on topic, of course), public schools, the Earned Income Credit, short-term cash loans, pre-approved credit, six-year car loans, no-money-down mortgages, rent subsidies, many organized religions and labor unions, student loans, professional sports, soft drink commercials, and so forth.

    People need to be much more cynical than they are. They need to realize that both large government (whether Republican or Democrat flavored) and large corporations do not act in the interests of individual people. They are much too wealthy, powerful, and corrupt to care. They are their own means and their own ends. People need to stand up for themselves in the midst of this, vote their conscience with both their wallets and their ballots, and be prepared to sacrifice materialistic prestige and social popularity in favor of knowing they made the right decision and did the best they could. Corporations and government need to become more modest and come back to realizing that they exist because of and for the People, not the other way around. It seems that every day the opposite of this is actually happening, and, ultimately, people will exist miserably in a rusty machine of regulation and consumption and live in complete fear of their creditors and their own government.

    1. Re:A culture of no accountability? by evianhat · · Score: 1


      "Personal responsibility and accountability is perhaps the most important thing that people can teach their kids. However, it seems that popular culture is increasing making it appear that people are rewarded for lying, cheating, killing, bribery, getting something for no effort, etc. Take Enron, WorldCom, the current Republican administration, reality television, nationalized health care proposals, Grand Theft Auto (to be on topic, of course), public schools, the Earned Income Credit, short-term cash loans, pre-approved credit, six-year car loans, no-money-down mortgages, rent subsidies, many organized religions and labor unions, student loans, professional sports, soft drink commercials, and so forth."

      Didn't you forget to add: getting free music and movies from the internet? It's not just the big entities that are corrupting the individual...the individual is more than happy to ingest the corruption as long as it suits his/her appetite.
      In fact, it doesn't take a Big Evil Faceless Entity(TM) to provide the corrupting device. Individuals now have the power to put that corruption into the hands of millions of people worldwide ( e.g. Shawn Fanning and Napster ).


      "Corporations and government need to become more modest and come back to realizing that they exist because of and for the People, not the other way around."

      I have to disagree. Corporations do not "exist because of and for the People". They exist to make as much money as they possibly can...especially public companies ( I belive that the executives and board members of a public company can actually go to jail if they do something that interferes with the maximization of their shareholders investments ).
      The only way to influence the corporations is through their pocketbooks, not by appealing to their sense of human decency and morality.
      And the two best ways to hit them in the pocketbook ( that I can think of offhand ) are to (a) stop buying their product, or (b) sue them. And that's exaclty why the victim's families (in this case) are right in suing the game maker. Hooray for them! Hopefully, this will make the game makers think about their gameplot and whether someone might really die as a result of some bit of the gameplay.

      Just my opinion. :)

      (btw, I've been programming for 21 years...10 years of game development...so I'm not a game-basher...just someone who would like to see the creators of games think a little bit more about what they're offering to the public).

    2. Re:A culture of no accountability? by cherokee158 · · Score: 1

      That was just barely on topic, but I applaud your penmanship. Very well written!

  38. The question is... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Now, let's assume the kids aren't lying through their teeth (I don't remember taking potshots at cars in GTA while standing...maybe if I had a large weapon...but to each his own) about the game influencing them to do this: Who let the kids get access to a gun, but who let the kids get access to GTA?!?

    From the article: William Buckner, 16, and Joshua Buckner, who turns 14 Sunday, pleaded guilty to reckless homicide, reckless endangerment and aggravated assault.

    A 13-year-old and a 16-year-old. Now, I think the argument could be made that a 16-year-old MIGHT be mature enough to play GTA (obviously not Billy-boy, though), but WTF was a 13-year-old doing playing that game?!? To add on to that, why have I seen kids - young kids - in game stores getting M-rated games? My wife and I watched a 9- or 10-year-old kid and his mother buy Vice City earlier this year, and the mother asked him if he wanted the strategy guide! Obviously that's one smart little kid...

    Now, don't get me wrong: I love the GTA series, but I'm 30. I wouldn't have let me at 13 play GTA, and I sure as hell know my mother wouldn't have, either. At 13, I couldn't handle that game, I know that.

    Where the hell are these kids' parents? Is Tennessee going to prosecute those idiots (I hope!)?

    1. Re:The question is... by Grey+Fox+LSU · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...and the sicken thing is that the parents either dont care, dont know, or dont care to know.

      Last Christmas I worked at Best Buy, selling consoles and console games. 9/10 parents didnt know about the ESPR rating system. 5/10 were shockedthat there was one, and that the game their kid wanted was rated "M" because of sex, drugs, violence, murder, life-like gore. 8/10 partents would putthe game down and not let their kid buy it. But 2/10 parents were like really....I'll get it anyway.

    2. Re:The question is... by cybermage · · Score: 1

      Last Christmas I worked at Best Buy, selling consoles and console games. 9/10 parents didnt know about the ESPR rating system. 5/10 were shocked that there was one, and that the game their kid wanted was rated "M" because of sex, drugs, violence, murder, life-like gore. 8/10 partents would putthe game down and not let their kid buy it. But 2/10 parents were like really....I'll get it anyway.

      You took the time to tell parents about this stuff and Best Buy let you keep your job? I'm impressed. Most of these large companies strike me as too immoral to care about anything but the absurd $50 a pop to push the games.

      I take the time to educate parents, when we've got rated material, where I work, but I'm management: so, no one can tell me to do otherwise.

  39. So then they should get.. by Inoshiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    25 charges of public mischief.
    24 charges of attempted murder.
    1 charge of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill.
    1 charge of murder one (since they clearly planned it).

    The statement that they were inspired by GTA is irrelevant. In the 16th century, some Catholic nuns started to walk around with heavy pelvic thrusting all the time. They claimed it was because Satan had visited their convent and ravaged them in both holes with his evil, barbed, bifurcated penis. Did Satan really do that? No, not any more than GTA is responsible for this.

    An action is not the same as an idea -- it takes a diseased mind to put an idea like, "it's fun to kill people" into practice.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:So then they should get.. by Jerf · · Score: 1

      In the 16th century, some Catholic nuns started to walk around with heavy pelvic thrusting all the time. They claimed it was because Satan had visited their convent and ravaged them in both holes with his evil, barbed, bifurcated penis.

      Reference? (Seriously.)

  40. Been playing Max Payne lately, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    title says it all...

  41. Movies, Games and Guns by erroneous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I tried the same excuse when I bit a guy's finger off and jumped to my fiery death in a pit of magma. I'd read about it in a book and it seemed cool.

    But seriously folks gun control is this issue here, not video games, or movies, or the sulky, moody, violent, careless, callous and fundamentally stupid nature of teenage boys.

    America has a lot of such boys and a lot of guns. Together they'll cause deaths. They'll never be rid of the boys so they'll have to do something about the guns.

    If they have to be pried from Charlton Heston's cold dead fingers I say "your proposal is acceptable".

    --
    erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
    1. Re:Movies, Games and Guns by xTEMPLARx · · Score: 1

      As has been stated before, where were the kids parents, and why didn't they have a healthy respect for the firearms they had obvious access to. As a child, I grew up knowing I had better NEVER touch a firearm in our household without the express permission and assistance of my parents. The consequences were dire.

      To blame video games or the firearms is ludicrous, when the fact remains that the parents were grossly negligent on several areas...

      T

    2. Re:Movies, Games and Guns by satterth · · Score: 1
      But seriously folks gun control is this issue here, not video games, or movies, or the sulky, moody, violent, careless, callous and fundamentally stupid nature of teenage boys.

      America has a lot of such boys and a lot of guns. Together they'll cause deaths. They'll never be rid of the boys so they'll have to do something about the guns.

      Well, if they did it like Canada is trying to do, then the kids could have been flagged before this could happen. Get and address for every gun in the country, then link it against everyone who has GTA. Send out the mob and take away the guns.

      Personally, i would like to see the owner of the weapon brought up on some sort of charges too. Trigger locks? Why are kids shooting with out supervision?

      --
      Being called a dork on Slashdot must be like being called the retard in special ed.
  42. I hope... by ivanmarsh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope when I finally do something stupid and evil that there is something popular that I can blame it on.

    Ehh...
    Doom made me do it...
    GTA made me do it...
    Satan speaking through my dog made me do it...

    Further proof that there should only be one punishment for violent crime; an industrial meat grinder.

  43. Re:yeah and i decided to emulate three musketeers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and went on a fencing spree into the city and also had sex with anything i saw..

    So that's why my Grandmother was walking funny

  44. Idiots. by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can't blame video games for sheer stupidity.

    1. Re:Idiots. by g-san · · Score: 1

      yep, they didn't even do it right. y'all are supposed to shoot out the tires, then go stand on top of the truck until the helicopter comes and then y'all shoot it down with yer rocket launcher.

      whoooooo doggie!!

    2. Re:Idiots. by Narphorium · · Score: 1

      Why not? Don't you think that maybe if these losers hadn't been spending all their time in a fake reality that they might have developed some sort of intelligence and responsibility?
      I don't think that violence in video games is the issue here. I think the fault lies with the parents who let video games raise their kids.

  45. Having the gun wasn't the reason by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can tell a lot of readers have lived in/near big cities most of their lives. A .22 is a small caliber rifle, and lots of people have them. To give them the (marginal) benefit of the doubt, it was the probably older kid's and meant for hunting. These were a couple of bored kids tired of shooting squirrels or stop signs and decided to shoot at moving targets, and are now (hopefully) horrified by what happened. (That's giving them the benefit of the doubt obviously - they may only care that they got caught, not that they hurt anyone.) The mere fact that they had a rifle doesn't mean anything; the fact that they seemed to think shooting at vehicles with people in them was ok does mean something.

    GTA is a smoke screen, and probably came from leading questions from the prosecutor hoping to get a name for himself or to shift blame - there is no point in GTA where you randomly shoot at trucks. You shoot at people, so if they were emulating the game then they knew full well that people could die.

    The sad part is that the 'juvy' distinction should be lifted for homicides. These murdering kids will be out at 19 each, and aren't going to be able to do anything besides turn to crime.

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    1. Re:Having the gun wasn't the reason by pi_rules · · Score: 1
      I'll elaborate on this one given that I agree with the original poster but would further like to drive the point home:
      I can tell a lot of readers have lived in/near big cities most of their lives. A .22 is a small caliber rifle, and lots of people have them. To give them the (marginal) benefit of the doubt, it was the probably older kid's and meant for hunting.


      A .22 is barely meant for hunting. Rabbits, squirrels, little things like that and you're okay. Something like a woodchuck though and a .22 really doesn't have proper stopping power. You'll kill it, yeah, but I've seen my own father get frustrated with shooting woodchucks with a .22 rifle and having the suckers run off and hide in areas where he couldn't dispose of him. I offered my .223 AR-15 for such purposes but he hasn't taken me up on it.

      Will a .22 kill a human? Yes, eventually. With a well placed shot you might achieve an immediate stop too. This doesn't excuse the juveniles actions in the least bit though. The first time I shot a .22 I was 8 years old and warned very very often that that bullet will carry for some distance. Anybody who's shot one should know that it -can- kill a human being. Using one to do so is foolish unless it's your only means of self defense.

      I guess where I'm going with this is that a .22 shell isn't really that dangerous overall. Throwing fist sized rocks at cars could have killed somebody with as much efficiency. Neither are acceptable practices however.

      As the original poster said, many who grew up in urban or non-gun environments might not understand just how pithy this weapon actually is. For the uninformed the .22 means it's .22 inches across in diamater. The actual charge behind it is also .22 inches around and is, oh, maybe a half or three quarters inch long. That isn't much powder and that bullet tip isn't very heavy. Maybe something like 20-25 grains? A common 9mm round is 115 grains in weight if that puts it into perspective with probably 8-10 times the powder behind it. That -still- is a small round.

      I don't own a 22 nor do I find them that much fun to shoot. Perhaps somebody more in the know can clean up my facts on the round size. My weapons are in 9mm, .45 ACP, .223, 7.62x39, 7.62x54, and 12ga. Adding a .22 would be mostly pointless I think :)
    2. Re:Having the gun wasn't the reason by Jonner · · Score: 1

      According to this page, the .22 Long Rifle round has about 1/8th the muzzle energy of the 9x19 parabellum. I have very little experience with firearms, but if I bought one, it would probably be a .22 rifle, since the ammo is cheap and relatively quiet. I have no interest in hunting, so I'd just be doing target practice. I've shot at cans with a friend's 7.62x39 rifles and his .22. The difference in noise and recoil is huge.

      As proven by these morons, the .22 can kill, even in the hands of an amateur. A powerful air rifle can kill if it hits the right spot. I've read that air rifles were once used in Russia for hunting wolves because they are so quiet.

  46. Did the kids mymic GTA... by Reapy · · Score: 1

    ...or does GTA mymic real life and idiots like these two kids?

  47. In other news: by AzraelKans · · Score: 5, Funny

    A 40 year old man was arrested in Chicago this morning:

    "He started acting weird" mentioned his coworkers, Timothy Arcade 40 year old, went and bought a bunch of aspirins and throw them in the floor across all the cubicles, then he proceeded to eat them while making a "snacka" "snacka" sound effect, several coworkers and security officers tried to stop him, but he elluded them succesfully, in his way he also grabbed some cherries that were in the middle of the office for no apparent reason.
    When the police finally arrived and arrested the man, he stated he was just trying to emulate pacman after hearing this the policeman let the poor man go and went to burn down namco's office on chicago.

    Later that afternoon , the police had to arrest Timothy again, after eating a large Pill in one of the corner cubicles he actually attemped to eat the coworkers that were chasing him.

    In other news some other 40 year old, was arrested yesterday for soliciting but he was let go when he confessed he was just emulating Leisure suit larry. The police is looking for sierra's offices to burn them down.

    VideoGames: the best way get you off the hook... always!

    --
    Go ahead MOD my day!
    More opinions here
    1. Re:In other news: by Rellik66 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of this quote:

      If PacMan had affected us as kids we'd be running around in dark rooms, munching pills and listening to electronic music. -- Arjuna Theban (possibly quoting someone else)

      ----
      --

      Too many zeros, not enough ones

    2. Re:In other news: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:In other news: by sahala · · Score: 1

      LOL. No, really. That's pretty funny.

    4. Re:In other news: by egriebel · · Score: 1

      Time to burn some Karma, but this is the funniest God-damn post I've read on /. in months! Time to add a new friend.

      --
      ACHTUNG! Das computermachine ist nicht fuer gefingerpoken und mittengrabben. Ist nicht fuer gewerken bei das dumpkopfen.
  48. romeo and juliet by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 1

    you don't see romeo and juliet blamed for suicides though.. strange that.

    Are you kidding? Or just a moron? Suicide is the third leading cause of death among 15 to 25 year olds. Each year, 500,000 from this same age group attempt suicide. Source: American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

    For ages 15-19, homicide is the #2 cause of death, suicide is #3. #1 is "accidental death". Source: Child Trends Databank.

    Romeo and Juliet are definitely "blamed" for some suicides. Some teens actually recreate the scene in high detail -- others are just "influenced" into believing that their 15-year-old "love" is so important, so desparately true, that they kill themselves when it doesn't work out.

    Am I saying that we should ban showings of "Romeo and Juliet"? Naturally not. We should be teaching our kids, or in general, quit having kids if we don't want to take responsbility for teaching them. Although by age 15, I would argue that kids should have responsibility for themselves, but they don't know it because their parents, teachers, and a zillion other people are busy taking responsibility from/for them.

    You get to drive at 16 (most states). At 18, you can vote, be called for jury duty, and in the case of boys, be drafted by the Army and forced to kill or be killed. At 21, you can buy a drink.

    So when do kids become adults? I am very very sure that they have no idea. The same people which tell them to "act responsibly" and to "be an adult" also tell them exactly what choices to make: "don't have sex", "don't drink", "don't smoke".

    Meanwhile the circle of blame keeps going around and around and around. The real change which needs to happen is not in the video game industry, or the gun industry, or the media. It is entirely in the upbringing of children to become responsible adults. Something is very fundamentally broken with respect to that right now.

    Anyway, no matter who is "to blame" some innocent people were shot and killed, by a pair of human beings with the ability to load and fire a deadly weapon. If you as a parent are not willing to invest the time and resources into educating your child, they will grow up and develop anyway, developing physical and mental powers which exceed their ability to decide when and what to do with it.

    So please, please, stop breeding if you are a moron. There's a good chance you will raise a mindless killer.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:romeo and juliet by delus10n0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think they missed the part where Romeo+Juliet is a TRAGEDY.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
    2. Re:romeo and juliet by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      well i haven't heard/seen/read about any case where romeo and juliet or any other classic tragedy had been blamed to be a source of inspiration for something that caused such intentional death, even though i'm pretty sure such things have happened(pretty damn sure), yet i see videogames blamed every so often for it. kind of like you would have seen rock'n'roll blamed for all things couple of decades back. it's not like i had any chance of getting a gun(well, maybe if i had been real determined and joined some club) into my hands before army(mandatory here) and even then i knew that it was a dangerous toy as anything so lethal is and i certainly haven't had the desire to go on a shooting spree even though i know how to operate an assault rifle and have played gta and gta:vc till the endings.

      **So please, please, stop breeding if you are a moron. There's a good chance you will raise a mindless killer.**
      and that is exactly my point too, there's a reason why you shouldn't leave your kids so that they have the access to a weapon(fully assembled, there's also a reason why you shouldn't leave guns around fully assembled) while the kids can't be responsible enough to not shoot at something that just moves.

      .

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  49. No no no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What they are *supposed* to get is, "Busted" and the cops then take all their ammo, guns and a "fine", then they get released the next day!

    Common man don't you know the legal system by now?

    E.

  50. hey, don't knock it till you try it by wanderers_id · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm currently a free man! And I owe it to this kind of defense! I was one of the first to download that Postal 2 demo... and stabing people in the face with a shovel, covering them in gas, then lighting them on fire was the most fun I've had in years! I had been doing that for like an hour a day... every day. Well, when there was a power outage and I couldn't get my daily dose of stabity death, I took my shovel and gas and headed into the next subdivision.

    Long story short, I'm free because I was "insane" and needed "help". And blaming the game helped me stay out of prison for 3 counts of murder.

    For anyone who is still pending litigation and wants to go full-on for the insanity plead, fire your lawyer and defend yourself... go for the chewbacca defense. It adds a special bit of believeability.

  51. It was lag... by wtom · · Score: 1

    no text

    --

    Styrofoam IS biodegradable, you're just impatient!
  52. Yep by Synn · · Score: 1

    I had a 22 rifle when I was 14 or 15, my best friend had one when he was 16. We sure as shit never shot at anyone or even towards where anyone might be.

    It's kind of funny but before we had our 22's we had pellet and BB guns. Now those we sort of abused, shot out lights, stop signs, whatever. But our 22's were "real" guns and we treated them with respect.

  53. Re:Do we really believe in personal responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's conumer tax. I don't think it costs the company anymore tax dollars than any other company though. May be wrong.

  54. The Cost of Liberty by jazman_777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once in a great while, a couple of nuts raised by twats go off and kill somebody. Obviously it's a very rare case. Or should we try to make it impossible? Oh, this is America, we're working for a zero-risk world. See you in Utopia!

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  55. apologies by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    sorry about the "moron" barb in my other comment. a bit out of line.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  56. Only in America... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...can a pair of stupid kids play a game, get a gun, and start shooting people... ...and have people immediately jump on the fact that they played a game instead of HAVING A FUCKING GUN!

    1. Re:Only in America... by Jonner · · Score: 1

      The gun doesn't come with instructions on what to shoot at. It doesn't have any preference for hitting a target, an animal, a person, or the dirt. The user has to have an idea of what he wants to hit.

      On the other hand, the game rewards the player for shooting unarmed citizens. The police do come after the player, but they can be killed too. The game encourages and rewards theft, murder, destruction, and general lawlessness in its simulated world.

      Rational, responsible people understand the difference between the real world and a simulated one. Young, impressionable kids with too little supervision and too much free time often aren't as able to make the distinction. The game didn't cause them to murder people on the highway, but the kids may have simply shot at cans if they hadn't played the game.

  57. Um, wrong. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    It's:

    "Guns don't kill people. I KILL PEOPLE"

    - Dude on UHF (Movie starring Weird Al Yankovic)

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Um, wrong. by karnal · · Score: 1

      Actually, wasn't it

      "Guns don't kill people. I DO...."

      --
      Karnal
    2. Re:Um, wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was in Happy Gilmore too, you dumb prick.

    3. Re:Um, wrong. by mt2mb4me · · Score: 1

      Well If we are on this subject, I always enjoyed the bumper sticker "If guns kill people then spoons make Rosie O'donell fat.

  58. LOL by Theaetetus · · Score: 1

    One of the first times I've laughed out loud from a /. post

  59. Same with my cousin's kids by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    My cousin's oldest kid is (I believe) 16, or turning 16 soon.

    He has full access to all of the guns (whether shotgun or rifle) on my aunt's farm, and goes hunting on his own often.

    That said, he's extremely responsible with the guns. Nerf weapons... YIKES. But real firearms, he's *damned careful* with.

    Yes, they live out in the country. Kids with guns are a normal thing in many parts of this country, and it's normally not considered a problem.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  60. Where'd they get the gun? by mmdurrant · · Score: 3, Funny

    Detective: Now tell me sonny, where'd you get the gun
    Kid: I already told you 3 f'in times. There was this floating skull thing behind a bush, I picked it up. A voice in the sky said, "Kill Frenzy!" like that announcer guy on "The Price is Right". All of the sudden I had this sniper rifle and the urge to kill 20 people in less than a minute. Was that wrong?

    --
    I see my shadow changing, stretching up and over me...
  61. Yeah. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    I think you're right.

    I'll have to watch it again sometime this weekend to confirm.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      although it was on that Jaws-lookin-guy's shirt in Happy Gilmore. UHF rocks

  62. GTA is emulated?!?! by Neillparatzo · · Score: 1

    Damn, everything's emulated nowadays! Did they add a MAME driver for it, or what?

    1. Re:GTA is emulated?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK, YOU

  63. They didn't emulate anything by M3wThr33 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everybody knows in GTA3 you can only fire uzi's out your car window, and unless you are doing a job, you can't pick up anyone else.

    Amateurs.(Vice City was in the past, doesn't count)

  64. Bunny hopping! by Radix37 · · Score: 1
    If there's anything that our office sessions of Quake II taught me, it's that the best way to move about in any situation is to constantly run while incessantly jumping like a rabbit 6 feet in the air.

    Of course bunny hopping is the way to get around in real life too ;-)

    --
    Speed Demos Archive - Lots of speed runs!
  65. Great recipe by DaveJay · · Score: 1

    Rich*, bored teenage kids with access to guns.

    I'd love to see what the parents are like.

    Perhaps if some other teenagers (who never played the game) go out and do this, they will claim to be emulating those boys in tenessee that they heard about on the news.

    Do you suppose if they did, people would take it seriously like they do the influence of games, or would they just shout "copycat killing, personal responsibility"?

    Interesting to think what would happen if they DID view it in the same way. Perhaps the original teenage boys would face additional charges for influencing the actions of the other teenagers.

    Or maybe we'd just stick a warning label on their foreheads. ;)

    - - -

    *They live near a country club, and presumably they walked or biked a short distance to get there, and we know they own the latest video games, so I think it's a safe assumption.

  66. Love your country like you love your dog by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some people love their country as a child loves a dog. As far as the child is concerned, the dog can pee on the carpet, chew up the shoes, and bite the neighbors all it wants -- the child does not see these flaws, and continues to love the dog unconditionally.

    Some people love their country as an adult loves a dog. The dog shouldn't pee on the carpet, chew up the shoes, or bite the neighbors, and the adult gets mad at the dog and does what they can to stop the inappropriate behavior -- but at the end of the day, the adult loves the dog, too, as much as the child does.

    - - -

    I am not calling anyone a child here, but simply making an analogy. I believe that Michael Moore, myself, and many others love this country as adults love a dog, while a whole lot of other people love this country as children love a dog.

    Here's the good news: at the end of the day, the dog is still loved, and neither type of love is a threat to the well-being of the dog.

    Here's the unsurprising part: those that love this country unconditionally believe that pointing out the flaws of this country == not loving this country. That is simply not true, and while you can shout us down all you want, we're going to keep on pointing out the flaws, for one reason:

    We want to fix the flaws so that the country, like our dogs, can live a long and healthy life. I think we can all agree on that.

    -Dave

    1. Re:Love your country like you love your dog by Matrix272 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We want to fix the flaws so that the country, like our dogs, can live a long and healthy life.

      I agree, for the most part. Except that all the "fixes" for the "flaws" of this counry that I've heard from certain people, including Tom Daschle, Bill & Hillary Clinton, etc., and eventually down to Michael Moore, generally include comparisons to other countries, specifically in Europe. That's one part I disagree with. With children in education, the Left (speaking generally here) thinks that each child is special, and shouldn't be held accountable to the achievements of other, more "lucky" children.

      We're always hearing about children that pass a grade, even when they get straight F's and can't speak basic English. (Now we're hearing about TEACHERS who can't pass a basic English test.) My point is this: If children must be judged by their own accomplishments, with no referencing of others, why must this country be judged passed only on the failures? There are a few things in Europe that work better than in the United States, although I can't think of any right off the top of my head.

      One example that springs to mind is health care. The government now wants to set up a giant medicare system to make hospital visits and doctor appointments "free"... except that it's not free. The taxpayers will have to pay for it. The problem with that is that the taxpayers are an increasingly decreasing group. Half the people pay almost all the taxes. The people that don't pay any taxes generally don't have jobs, and collect unemployment and/or welfare (which isn't counted in the unemployment rate). Since they don't have jobs, they'll go to the hospital for any reason, since it's "free". I, and you, and others like us end up paying for it. We got this wonderful idea from places like the USSR (where it didn't work, never has worked, and never will work).

      When I hear a solution to a problem that makes sense, I'll consider it... no matter where the idea comes from. One idea I definitely agree with to help with the tax situation is the FairTax. It abolishes the IRS, eliminates paperwork on April 15 (for individuals and a lot of businesses), and makes all necessary items non-taxable. Food, rent, etc. wouldn't be taxable. To replace those prices, a nation-wide sales tax would be enacted at around 22%. Corporations would save more than 25% because of the lack of taxes they'd have to pay, and prices would come down because of it. In the end, a $.99 2-liter of soda would still cost $.99... after taxes (if soda were taxable, which it wouldn't be). It would also make credit card payments non-taxable... so I could pay several hundred dollars more per month towards my debt... and that makes me happy.

      If any of this post is slightly unintelligable, I apologize. It's 1:15am, and I'm quite tired...

      --
      "It's better to have a gun and not need it than need a gun and not have it." ~ Christian Slater, True Romance
    2. Re:Love your country like you love your dog by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      I meant to reply to this at the time I read it, ah well.

      Just wanted to say good job, that's a wonderful analogy, hits the nail on the head. Nice to see some americans can love their country as adults ;)

      BTW, I'm Canadian, and I also love america as an adult should.

      --
      No Comment.
  67. emulation by ianmorris · · Score: 1

    if he was emulation the game, it would have to be the game boy version (or the japanese gba version because those roms can be abtained easily.

    --
    i am the self-proclaimed king of free stuff

  68. So... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

    Did you just finish reading the Crucible? =P

    --
    -insert a witty something-
    1. Re:So... by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

      Crucible? Never heard of it. What is it about? I just remember the Salem events from my American Studies class.

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  69. When will it end by carcosa30 · · Score: 1

    I suppose now Laughing Boy, or Smiling Worm Boy, the blaster worm idiot, is going to blame his despicable, heinous crime on Core War.

    When I say heinous crime, I mean it. Did he cause billions of dollars worth of damage, aggregate worldwide? That money could have been spent feeding poor people.

    --
    Intolerance for ambiguity is the mark of the authoritarian personality.
    1. Re:When will it end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it wouldn't, because that's communism.

  70. Parents by AllenChristopher · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Indeed, even a moderately good parent is perfectly capable of turning a potential sociopathic maniac into a fully productive member of society. It's a simple matter of mental hygiene, really, neglected for the same sorts of reasons that people get herpes and don't floss. A few good lessons from the Bible, not too heavy on the "eye for an eye bit," good schooling in an upper-class neigbourhood, plenty of involvment in team sports, and by the time your young white male is 33 he'll be...

    Wait a second, this is sounding like the FBI profile they always turn out five minutes after they find out there's a serial killer of any kind.

  71. Me and my frisbee... by Necromancyr · · Score: 1

    So, who wants to place a bet on how long it takes for reports of kids running around flinging frisbees or saw blades at people and emulating Tron?

    'But...I thought they could be reloaded...'

  72. Allan Sherman's Rape of the A*P*E. by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    The chapter listing is on this website.

    I lost my copy of the book years ago, though, so I can't look up the source of that reference.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Allan Sherman's Rape of the A*P*E. by Jerf · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that'll do. Interesting looking.

  73. Even blaming the parents is stupid. by fishexe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, I agree that the parents probably weren't doing their job. But at some point you have to blame kids for what kids do. These weren't little 6-year-olds with no conception of the permanence of death, or the lethality of bullets. They were teenagers. They knew what they were doing, and they did it.
    You say "people are once again looking for the scapegoat to blame" yet yourself blame the parents. Sounds like scapegoating to me. The blame for this rests on the shoulders of the perpetrators.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    1. Re:Even blaming the parents is stupid. by Jonner · · Score: 1

      The blame doesn't belong in exactly one place. I think some blame belongs with the game designers and marketers, but far more lies with the kids and their parents. The parents should have realized that they weren't responsible enough to use deadly weapons unsupervised. They probably should have realized that the kids weren't responsible enough to play the game. Hopefully, the kids are being punished harshly enough that they'll consider potential consequences of their actions in the future.

      People, especially impressionable kids, emulate what they see. The company should care about the effects their product has on their customers, but that doesn't mean the victims should be able to get tens of thousands of dollars out of them. I'm not even sure if the concept of punitive damages even makes sense. Why should a plaintiff receive money taken from the defendant for the purpose of punishment? Shouldn't it go to a disinterested third party?

    2. Re:Even blaming the parents is stupid. by Bander · · Score: 1

      My five year old knows that death is forever, and bullets kill people. Of course, my five year old also understands that if he hits someone because he was playing a real-life game of Jak and Daxter, he's going to be in deep trouble.

      Prosecute the kids, not the parents, but I hope the parents have years of sleepless nights because (1) their little darlings are in prison and are routinely rented out for a pack of cigarettes, and (2) they raised a couple of morons that murdered someone, and had no better excuse than they saw it in a videogame.

      Bander

  74. Good point... by fishexe · · Score: 1

    This is rated funny, but it does raise a valid issue, namely, it's only because parents' groups raise a big stink about the newest violent game that comes out that kids think they can get away with blaming their actions on the game(/tv show/rapper/whatever). If people would just stop claiming that games are going to make kids violent, kids would stop using it as an excuse and probably not pull this shit half as often.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  75. I've got it! All 4 steps! by garyok · · Score: 1

    1. Completely ignore your children, get drunk doing the stuff you like to do, and let them entertain themselves;
    2. Let them have guns;
    3. When they kill folks, sue the games/movies/TV/rock bands for turning their little angels (as if the parents knew what their progeny were actually like...) into callous murdering bastards;
    4. PROFIT!!!

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
  76. Is there any way... by phorm · · Score: 1

    That perhaps somebody could blame serial killers on Microsoft, or perhaps SCO? I mean, it seems that everyone out there has a scapegoat for their own actions, so perhaps at least we can find somebody we don't like to blame too.

    I'm sorry mommy, I didn't steal that chocolate bar, since name is "Henry" it is obviously my intellectual property and I had a right to it!

  77. Guns don't kill people.... by glassesmonkey · · Score: 1

    *I* do.. (From Weird Al's UHF)

  78. Oh for f*ck's sake by Wylfing · · Score: 1
    From the ABC article:

    They told police they were emulating Grand Theft Auto on the night of June 25 when they took shotguns to Interstate 40, near their Newport, Tenn., home, and opened fire on vehicles.

    ABC news burns me up. I hate their spin^H^H^H^Hreporting. If these kids were using shotguns then they must have been leaping onto passing autos and shooting point-blank into the windshields. ABC's anti-gun editors are using RIAA math, where .22 caliber is the "equivalent" of a shotgun.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
  79. Re:Do we really believe in personal responsibility by Spittoon · · Score: 1

    Super Smash Bros.

    Also, you have no idea what the tax burdens of Rockstar and Nintendo are, respectively.

    Also, would you include Teletubbies on your list of "things that cause no harm"? I'd argue with you on that one.

    In America, we tend to believe that adults are responsible for their own behavior. And this is a good thing. As a poster said above, if everything is driven by what is safe for children, then there will only be things appropriate for children in the world. No cars, no television drama, no mystery novels, no CNN, no police, no firefighters, no electricians (electricity is dangerous), no exploration, no shark research, no humor aimed for the minds of adults-- no jerry seinfeld, because he grows out of an adult world, not a child's.

    There are problems in the world, sure, but infantilizing everything on the planet isn't the cure. Teaching people to be responsible for their own behavior is a step. Teaching our children to recognize duplicity, to THINK CRITICALLY, and to make wise decisions, is the cure.

    What the heck is this post modded Informative for?

  80. Mindless trolls and fanbois by urbanbrian · · Score: 1

    I can't believe the words i'm hearing out of my fellow slashdotters. I'll grant that the videogame industry has been taking some unjust slander over the course of the last few years, but this is an instance where I think there may be a little something to the issue at hand. Grand Theft Auto 3/Vice City is one of those ultra-rare titles which blends a ruthless, cold, criminal element with unrestricted action/motivation in the game, allowing for someone to be as sadistic as they see fit to. For a responsible adult who has clear definitions for right and wrong, and a healthy respect for the law, this isn't such a problem. However, we're not talking about adults here. We're talking about children playing a morally reprehensible game - children who clearly lacked adequate and proper supervision/rolemodels.

    This game should not have come into the hands of kids. The videogaming industry has a ratings system for it's titles, just as the movie industry does. Is this to be taken any less seriously just because they're videogames? No. The problem is not always irresponsible parents who aren't keeping tabs on their heathens. I gurentee 84.6% (being -conservative-) of the people who have made that statement commenting on this story do NOT have children, or any experience with which to comment from related to delinquent children.

    Is the problem that the videogame industry is producing "too violent" titles, causing ethical and moral dillemas for today's videogame afficinados? Partially. Don't dispute that, otherwise I would be tickled pink and obliged to hand your 9-year-old encouragable son a copy of GTA: Vice City and show him how to pick up hookers and get some action. Oh, you don't want that? Why's that? Because the game is -morally reprehensible-, it advocates murder, larsony, and other thug-like behaviors typical to an aspiring mafia syndicate lord.

    So, where does the real problem lay? Somewhere between the industry and the public perception of the industry. Videogames have long been thought of as devices for children. The audience has changed, however. The kids who played Excitebike, Mario 2, and Marble Madness into the wee hours of the night are now adults. This, combined with the natural evolution of technology (read Moore's Law), creates a scenario where more sophisticated/adult targetted titles are coming to pass. The problem is that the naive public still perceive videogames as a child's sport, and those who've been playing videogames all along are so threatened by the notion that videogames can cause detriment to a person's logical synapses that they'll blame anyone/anything but the game itself.

    Now recently, there's been some amount of headway into truly 'adult' (X rated) console titles. Maybe when you irresponsible videogame addicts see your offspring commanding Tommy Vercetti to bang a hooker in full, graphic detail in GTA: 5, you'll stop being so selfish with the content of your opinion.

    Until the public starts taking videogame ratings a little more seriously, expect these trends to continue.

    Until the legions of videogame-going adults see that children aren't growing up on Mario anymore, but more thought-provoking titles, expect these trends to continue.

    Until someone perfects a method (or device?) for controlling delinquent children who do as they see fit to, expect these trends to continue.

    Oh, and who am I to speak about all this?..

    Just someone in the 'biz.

    --
    They came, they saw, they left, disguisted.
    1. Re:Mindless trolls and fanbois by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree with your statement that children can be influenced by violent videogames, you seem to have missed a major point here. These "children" were not 9-year-olds... they were 14 and 16. At that point, they should know what's right and wrong. This makes their defense a little hard to swallow...

  81. Rednecks+Guns+Grand Theft Auto = ??? by d0n+quix0te · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there is a joke in there somewhere ... or the next video game title from Sierra, oh wait that was Redneck Rampage...

    but seriously whatwere the kids doing with a Game rated NC17 and with guns? My suggestion-- castrate the hillbilly parent by kicking his sister on her chin ;-)

  82. I remember... by SaintElmo · · Score: 1

    ...growing up playing Madden '93. Now I'm a professional football player!

    --
    these boxen have no names
  83. We're going nowhere by Jonner · · Score: 1

    If apes "exhibit better social structure" than humans, what makes you think we are a notch above them at all? Can you honestly say that human society is more advanced overall (not just in technology) than it was five hundred or a thousand years ago? Sure, some advances have been made. People are freer in some ways, but less free in others. We have better control over nature, but we damage it more. Power concentration has shifted from kingdoms, empires and corrupt religious institutions to superpowers, global corporations, and global diplomatic bodies. Instead of arbitrary prosecution by land owners, we now fear arbitrary prosecution by "intellectual property" owners.

    Human civilization is not advancing. At best, it's staying at the same level. The basic problem is human nature: it's corrupt. That's why, 'Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men' (Lord Acton, in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton, 1887.)

  84. Spears? by borkus · · Score: 1

    Where do you live? Kenya?

    Besides, everyone knows spears are primarily a hunting weapon.

  85. I'm worried and scared... by JamesTRexx · · Score: 1

    that this sort of thing will spread around the world. People, not just kids, doing horrible things like that and entertainment, in whatever form, getting blamed for it. It's the parents who are responsible for the right upbringing of kids. Teach them morals and values, make them understand the results of the actions they do. A simple letter of apology, obviously dictated by an adult as someone metioned before, won't help the victims and the victims family in any way. Not only should the kids get a decent punishment, but the parents as well. They are the ones responsible for the behaviour of their children. It's about time people start taking responsibilty for the things they do. Don't know how to raise a kid, don't start on one. And of course the gun. Where the hell did they get the gun!? The days of revolution in the US are over. Everybody wielding a gun is dangerous as shown here. No wonder there's a lot of crime because any two-bit criminal can get his hands on one and start a massacre if he wants to. Now I'm not so much afraid of Europe allowing everyone a gun, as the people slowly starting to act in the same way and putting the blame for their faults on tv/games/movies/whatever... I hope this gets a lot more coverage than the average soapseries and it'll teach some people to think about what they do. But then I read more often how the educational system isn't teaching the youth to think, but to do as they are told like good droids, so it'll be forgotten soon.

    --
    home
  86. Hmmm, lets build off Heinlein here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    take the kids and the parents (I will also throw in the lawyers for no extra charge), put them in a large city square and whip them a bit each day. They remain in stocks facing the passing by citizens. (i.e. the ones who chose responsibility) You of course monitor them by medical personnel and feed them, but their lives will consist of public whippings and display for a couple of weeks. Then hold them directly financially responsible for what happened.

    Then issue a public statement reminding all of the importance of thought, the importance of responsibility, and the importance of making good choices. You can even admonish the game makers for being slime. GTA is a slime piece of trash... don't you just love it when music and games focus on killing cops! Yay! Lets make games where you rape little girls next! YAHOO!

    However, the slime of the GTA dev's is irellevant to the issue of blame in this crime.

  87. Ban the Declaration of Indepence! by tjstork · · Score: 1


    It makes me want to shoot the king and overthrow the government...

    "When in the course of human events it becomes necessary...

    Play that sweet home alabama and start blasting away!

    --
    This is my sig.
  88. Accounting for stupidity by veshman · · Score: 1

    There is no way Take Two should be responsible for the idiocy of these kids (and their parents). Violence in video games has been around forever, and they have been blamed forever, so this is nothing new. Having said that, stupidity can almost be predicted.
    We have seen how many people copy Jackass. It may be time to put warnings on video games like, "Do not attempt to fly, become invisible, shoot things, shoot people, become a robot, jump on floating lillies, or anything else you see in this not-based-in-reality video game"
    Yes, it is stupid that such a warning is even necessary, and it will suck to see a screen like that everytime you play a game, but unfortunately one person is dead and another seriously injured. If it can be prevented, it's worth it.
    BTW - I have never played GTA...is this warning already on there?

  89. 22 long rifle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Standard equipment for boys as young as 8 years old throughout much of the U.S., Canada, and other parts of the 1st world where guns haven't been banned.

    Many, many summer camps and high schools still teach the use of the gun, and students often compete in intramural sharpshooting contests.

    The bullets are quite small, and the most popular kind is the soft "target" variety for use on paper; however, HV and hollow points are suitable for things like squirrels and skunks, and can severly injure a person.

  90. Carmageddon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have to agree, where are the parents. But I will say this....don't drive a car shortly after playing a game like Carmageddon....I found myself speeding and looking for other cars to smash into. Creeped me out. I now wait at least 30 minutes before driving.

  91. WOW, DOES THIS MEAN AUTOS WILL BE BANNED? by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like the car's what did them in.

    =)

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  92. This couldn't happen in the UK by ralphclark · · Score: 1

    ...because in the UK, although we do have violent video games like Grand Theft Auto, we don't hand out guns like choc-chip cookies and we especially don't let them anywhere near children. Especially children with IQ's somewhere in the imbecile range.

    On the other hand it should come as no surprise that this sort of thing would happen in the US where guns are objects of worship and virtually anyone with a few dollars to spend can have one for the asking. Even if they are the sort of cretin who would leave a gun lying around for kids to play with unsupervised.

    Those of you who are about to jump in here with the usual empty hypocrisy about nonexistent militias and duty to defend against government tyranny, you're all in denial about this gun thing. Get over it. You've been living under a tyranny since GWB stole the election and I still don't see any militias forming up to defend the people's freedom. I do see plenty of ordinary people getting shot though.

    People with guns shoot people. If you let people have guns, people will get shot. Yes, it is as simple as that.

    For those of you still living in 1890: don't you dare mod this down as a troll. It's fair comment and you know it. It's time you lot started thinking about what kind of society you really want to live in rather than clinging onto some outmoded romantic ideal of the brave homesteader defending his land. You're supposed to be a civilized people, for heaven's sake. Get this: civilization means not having to rely on the threat of armed force in the course of your daily life.

  93. are these kids sane? by orpx · · Score: 1

    You shoot someone in GTA, what happens? they disappear, u think nothing of it, get caught by the police, reset the game. You shoot someone in REAL LIFE? they die, people cry, funeral is arranged, you goto jail. Does it actually take that much logic to know this? This is not only a fault of video game makers. Its a fault of the way our society is. Even then, video game makers should not be blamed for their art, even if it is sensless.

  94. What about reading the bible. by justhacking · · Score: 1

    That's right..I read that David put a rock in a slingshot and killed a guy seven feet tall. So I went out and started shooting rocks at tall people.

  95. Games are not a strong enough influence by Thangodin · · Score: 1

    Kids, and everyone else, for that matter, are most heavily influenced by those around them. There is nothing nearly so strong as the contagion of ideas created by physical proximity and interaction with others. Video games and media simply do not generate the type of bond required to exert a strong influence on behaviour--unless they are the only influence--in other words, unless the kids are socially isolated, with little or no family or corrective influence. This can only happen if the parents either can't be bothered to pay attention to their kids, or simply don't have the time due to other commitments, usually job related. And classrooms with fifty pupils in them, where the teacher can't even remember half of the kids names, don't help the situation either.

    So if a kid is shooting at other people or property, it is either because this is what he was taught by his parents, or because his parents exert so little influence over him that even the weakest prevailing breeze can bend him this way or that. So maybe the parents are at fault, or maybe the parents are just never there because their economic situation requires them to commute five hours a day to work for another twelve hours. And usually they do it to provide for their children.

    And yet the very people who so often cry in outrage against the media for it's effects on children will not speak a word on behalf of the working poor, and have little or no concern for education. If they want family values, maybe they should serve Mammon a little less and the God they claim to serve a little more.

  96. for god sake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am really sad to see most people making fun about this story. For god sake, someone has died, please show a bit more sympathy.

  97. Thank you moderator! by GeckoX · · Score: 1

    Glad to see you read the whole thread so as you'd understand the context of my rant.

    Off-topic would have been appropriate, but modding this to Flamebait just proves what is wrong with this system.

    (Yes, I know, another Flamebait or Troll mod coming down the pipe!)

    --
    No Comment.
  98. Rob the bank by pix0 · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... mayb we should create a game that rob the banks then we can have some cash from the bank.