Slashdot Mirror


The Oldest Mouse Contest

Shipud writes "Nature reports a contest that was launched in Britain today, to produce the oldest laboratory mouse. Current record in 5 years -- 150 in human years. From the page : ``Researchers can use any technique to boost longevity, including genetic manipulation and stem-cell therapy''. Winners will receive cash for every day beyond the current record. The Methuselah Mouse contest was created in an effort to boost research into human longevity."

386 comments

  1. Three words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cry Oh Genix. I Am the Immortal Mousie!

    1. Re:Three words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ye all gonna die anyway

    2. Re:Three words... by Illbay · · Score: 1
      "Oldest Mouse"?

      Wouldn't that be "Steamboat Willie"?

      --
      Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
    3. Re:Three words... by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Oh, I was thinking it was the mouse that was nicked from Xerox PARC and placed next to a fruit for a few years, but was lifted from there and now resides in a little town in Washington.

      --

      I'm glad we have mice without balls now, so I don't keep waiting for them to reproduce!

  2. Studies show: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Research increases life expectancy in mice.

  3. New world coming by Matrix2110 · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Watch experiments like this be embraced by the old school of thought, I will bet the funding flows very well to 'selected' genetic experiments such as this but not so good for genetics feeding the world for example.

    I know I am going to get a 'Flamebait' Mod for this post.

    (But hey, It is my one hundredth post And I will Sink my Karma If I Want To.)

    Little Richard Simmons action there.

    Thank you /.

    I have learned so much to get to this point.

    I really want to express my gratitude for the positive opinions out there.

    You know who you are.

  4. I Win! by akadruid · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've had my mouse for nearly 10 years!
    All they need is a little care and attention, and maybe cleaning the ball every now and again.
    Of course, many people just go rushing after new toys, like PS2 and scollwheels and second buttons...

    Well some one was gonna say it anyway I guess

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    1. Re:I Win! by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Yes I have a number of mice here with good lifespan, good rollerballs on them!
      But really, I dont think its good for the karma of the universe to this if it involves pain for the mouse (and it undoubtedly does)

    2. Re:I Win! by rnd() · · Score: 2, Funny

      As I read the headline all I could think was I sure am glad I insisted that my mom not throw out my old Apple //c and peripherals...

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    3. Re:I Win! by dcw3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not even close...look here: http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/Archive/patent /Mouse.html

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:I Win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..and maybe cleaning the ball every now and again

      We're talking about mice with balls here.

    5. Re:I Win! by bursch-X · · Score: 0

      Your mouse has only one ball? Did you cut off the other one?

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  5. Test for side-effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We know where this leads us to:
    Before pushing the longevity drug, please make sure that it does not make the user infertile. Thank you.

    1. Re:Test for side-effects by mrjb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Before pushing the longevity drug, please make sure that it does not make the user infertile.
      Actually, after a certain age, that might be a desireable side effect.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:Test for side-effects by ameoba · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, a much better idea would be to make the user infertile UNTIL a specified age. I'm just turning 25 and I'd love to be sterile for the next 5yr, as long as it was trivially reversible.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    3. Re:Test for side-effects by jx100 · · Score: 1

      And of course, anything that the Aschen give us is right out...

  6. What about Mickey Mouse? by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doesnt he hold the record?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
    1. Re:What about Mickey Mouse? by richie2000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, he probably does. And if he doesn't, it's just a matter of time since congress just keep adding years to his economical life...

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    2. Re:What about Mickey Mouse? by lhpineapple · · Score: 1

      Mickey Mouse should be disqualified, he is not a laboratory mouse.

      Pinky and the Brain on the other hand...

      Brain: Come Pinky! We must prepare for tomorrow night.

      Pinky: Why? What are we going to do tomorrow night?

      Brain: The same thing we do every night....TRY TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD!

    3. Re:What about Mickey Mouse? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And as long as congress keeps extending copyright, there will be no legal way to make a short film of Mickey Mouse dying a gruesome death. So, in this sense Mickey Mouse is indeed practically immortal.

    4. Re:What about Mickey Mouse? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 1

      Not really, While the copyright on "steam boat willy" will at some point lapse. The trademark on Mickey will last forever, as long as Disney keeps using the charecter and defending it legally.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    5. Re:What about Mickey Mouse? by danila · · Score: 1

      If you want to make a short film on Mickey Mouse, come to Russia for a short trip. Bring your notebook with you, stay in some nice resort in the countryside and work on your big horror masterpiece. All movies older than 30 years are in public domain in Russian Federation, so you can also kill Bambi, Snowwhite and a whole host of Disney's cartoon characters. :) You will also be able to distribute your new film online (for free or for a fee) from a server located in Russia and not fear any sort of prosecution, because it would be 100% legal.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  7. Lemonparty! by anonymous+coword · · Score: 0

    If you want to see research about older life, search for lemonparty on $SEARCH_ENGINE, or see the lemonparty page on nero

  8. Why? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see the obvious scientific benefits in research like this. What I don't see is if we really would like to live much longer. I for one feel that imortality would be more of a curse than a blessing. Thoughts?

    Then again, if we get hints on dementia and other comparable illnesses I'm all for it!

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Why? by Eponymous+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny

      The need for immortality is obvious. Given an infinite lifespan--with all of its infinite possibilities--there will finally be a non-zero probability that the average Slashdot reader will be able to lose his virginity.

      --
      It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
    2. Re:Why? by SlashDread · · Score: 1

      Talk to some old people, youngster. /Dread

    3. Re:Why? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Talk to some old people, youngster.

      I have, and many are quite content with what they'we done in life and really feel that it's a good thing that life eventually ends. There are bound to be exceptions though.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    4. Re:Why? by LeoDV · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think we tell ourselves that immortality would be a curse to make ourselves feel better about not having it. Think about it, it takes years, maybe even a lifetime, to know just a big city, or a country. If you were to go backpacking round the world, without paying heed to the time passing (and for good reason), by the time you'd make it back to where you started, everything will have changed so much you could as well go round again.

      And if you get tired of that, it'd take at least a few centuries to read all the great literature, watch all the great movies, listen to all the great music... There is so much humanity produced and is producing, that not only is a lifetime not enough, but probably not even eternity. Entropy would take its toll on you before you'd be done with everything you had wanted to do.

    5. Re:Why? by Freddy+Fantabulous · · Score: 1

      As long as one can grow as old as he wishies without seeing life as "a curse" then why bother dying? If you ever get sick of living, there'll always be a way out.

    6. Re:Why? by CGP314 · · Score: 0

      I for one feel that imortality would be more of a curse than a blessing. Thoughts?

      I think you are out of your mind. As far as I know, this world is all we have, and I'd rather be alive than decomposing.

    7. Re:Why? by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I for one feel that imortality would be more of a curse than a blessing. Thoughts?

      My take on this is that people who fear death are often those that don't make full use of the life they have. People that live full and rich lives don't fear death.

      There is a memorable scene in a classic old movie, The Man Who Would Be King with Michael Caine and Sean Connery. Facing death due to an avalanche in the Himalayas, one turns to the other and says something like "we may have lived half the time of most men, but we've lived twice the life". Thus, they face death with humour and with their heads held high, without regret or worry.

    8. Re:Why? by asb · · Score: 1

      Instead of a long life I'd prefer an average length life without all the problems that come with old age (arithritis and such).

      Also a competition like this will make the mice suffer longer. Whoever developes a morale and stops messing up with life first (human or animal) should get the first price.

      --
      Antti S. Brax - Old school - http://www.iki.fi/asb/
    9. Re:Why? by amateur+bore · · Score: 0

      I know what you mean. I remember going to religious classes when I was about 10 and the local vicar talking about eternal life in heaven. I remember saying that the thought of eternal life was just as frightening as eternal death. His banal reply was something like 'I'm sure God will be able to find something for you to do'. I'm an atheist now. The idea of going on forever is horrifying but so is the idea of not existing at all (I guess it feels the same as I felt before I was born).

      Having said that I wouldn't mind an extra few hundred years and probably after having lived through that, a few hundred more would be cool. Maybe wanting to live forever and not wanting to die are different things?

    10. Re:Why? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, one of my favorite quotes is "Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines."

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    11. Re:Why? by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Interesting
      if we get hints on dementia

      That is the whole problem. My mom works in an elderly home and she told me that most of them have signs of dementia. The problem is not that our bodies cannot live very long, the problem is that the brain usually starts malfunctioning first.
      Sad, but true....

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    12. Re:Why? by SlamMan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Having a grandfather who spent 4 years in a home after a stroke and a heart attack, I know exactly what you mean. I do wonder if thats not a very good representative sample though. There are hoards of elderly people that are just fine out in the world. I wonder if being treated as an invalid as most people in a home are is more a cause of dementia than a symptom.

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    13. Re:Why? by Gyan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that the novelty would wear out.

      After I've completely known 100 cities, the 101st would be a drag, despite it being a new experience. You'll have learnt enough to see the 101st city as just another instance with different specifics. After reading 10001 books, you will start predicting plots and other elements of literature much better. There won't be much excitement of anticipation left. The root behind all this would be that since you've lived for centuries/millenia, your understanding of human behaviour would be sufficiently mature to dull the curiousity related to the fruits of human creativity.

    14. Re:Why? by Monk[Deviant+Form] · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes WHY??
      am i the only one thats wondering WHY we have to torture maim and inprison fellow beings?
      immortality?
      we do enough damage in the short lives we already have. I don't see much point in longer lives untill we have grown enough to do positive things with that time.

    15. Re:Why? by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... unless he is occupied with playing Duke Nukem Forever all the time.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    16. Re:Why? by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why is the idea of not existing a horrifying one (to you)? You are atheist, so you (nor I) have anything to fear in the way of eternal punishment or eternal life.

      Your body just shuts down, you cease to be. Nothing frightening or horrifying in that, just like being in a dreamless sleep, infact, when my time comes I expect I'll be looking forward to it.

      Atheists should not fear death, for we have nothing to fear after it.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    17. Re:Why? by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one feel that imortality would be more of a curse than a blessing. ...You could fly around the galaxy and insult every creature in it, in Alphabetical order.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
    18. Re:Why? by kinnell · · Score: 1
      If you were to go backpacking round the world, without paying heed to the time passing (and for good reason), by the time you'd make it back to where you started, everything will have changed so much you could as well go round again.

      ...just think of the credit card bill you could amount!

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    19. Re:Why? by amateur+bore · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm glad you feel like that but I don't think all atheists do. Humanity created religion to act as a psychological comfort for the absurdity of existence after all. Sometimes I envy the deluded faithful. I'm not happy as an atheist but it's so obviously the truth.

      Yep - off topic.

    20. Re:Why? by nautical9 · · Score: 0

      Ah, crap! And I just rented that! Way to spoil the ending... (you insensitive clod) :P

    21. Re:Why? by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      Yes, however, unless we figure out how to make people stop getting old (instead of just figuring out how to make them stop dying), the limit of SexPossibilityFunction(SlashdotReader) as age approaches infinity is still 0.

      -- Dr. Eldarion --

    22. Re:Why? by Zachary+Kessin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally would like to live a very long time, after all who would not want that. On the other hand I understand that at some point I will need to stand down and let the next generation step up to bat. If my generation were to be able to live forever (or just a lot longer than any before), what chance would my children have?

      Someday I will have children, and I want them to be able to step out of the shadow of my generation at some point. After all every generation before ours has gotten out of the way when the time is right.

      --
      Erlang Developer and podcaster
    23. Re:Why? by Epistax · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely. I assume we're talking about clinical immortality (don't be run over by a truck), not some sort of fancy mythological mortality.

      It'd be interesting as to see around what age the brain gets full. Oh wait that's 14.

    24. Re:Why? by Stiletto · · Score: 1


      If we were to find a way to live forever it would probably not be as 27 year olds. It would be our years of hobbling around, playing bingo, driving slow, shitting our own pants, suffering two kinds of cancer, etc. etc.

      Hardly something to aspire to.

    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you're right about getting tired of the 101st city you visit. However, let's keep in mind that by the time you reach that point, _many_ things will have changed (not just cities .. technology, science, etc). Odds are in 10-20 years we'll be visiting Mars. In another 50 actually exploring it with humans. And in another 50? Perhaps populating other planets? There's a pretty interesting space race starting up (akin to that of the 60s), so this is entirely possible.

      So in short, if you got tired of Earth, wait a little while and go to another planet.

    26. Re:Why? by vvikram · · Score: 2, Insightful

      hi there. very interesting point. didn't occur to me. but i did think about it after your post.

      don't you think that you should also extend exploration three-dimensionally if our age increases? in other words won't we have new planets and stars and asteroids to go around ; just not plain dull cities on the earth.

      personally i think we will always have curiosity. the argument that things become dull is akin to the famous statements that everything that has to be invented has been [by some patent office officiando in the late 1800's]

      human curiosity is infinite. if we don't get something tangible/physical to look we have enough brains to evolve virtual complex worlds [think math formulae, matrix etc] in our tiny little minds

      thanks

    27. Re:Why? by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm not having that. I mean, here I sit with thousands upon thousands of MP3s. A great many of these songs are based on the good old verse-chorus-verse-chorus-twiddlybit-repeatchorust ofade formula, and between them I'm sure just about every chord progression you care to name is represented, but I'm not likely to decide that there's no point listening to any new music just because it's all been done before.

      Having said that, you're not wrong about the city thing. As long as you're travelling around Middle America, anyway. There's only so many ways you can arrange a load of shopping malls, fast-food outlets and car parks in a grid pattern before it starts getting a bit tired.

    28. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At first I agreed, but then with all this gained experience and knowlage what would you write or invent? Now imagine everyone had this ability.

      Of course the planet would be over populated and we would use all our power to kill each other off.

    29. Re:Why? by aastanna · · Score: 1

      To solve that problem we need to figure out how to make slashdot readers more like Hugh Hefner.

    30. Re:Why? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Silliness. Nobody's talking about immortality in terms of keeping old people as such alive longer; it's about slowing down, stopping, or even reversing the aging process itself. I'll take any of those, please, and despited the grumblings one always hears when this subject comes up, I suspect the vast majority of people would do the same.

      I've noticed that those who object most vehemently to the idea are usually the very young, because death isn't really real to them yet anyway, and because they're easily bored; and the very old, because they've pretty much adjusted to the idea that they're going to die soon. But for those of us in the vast middle -- old enough to understand mortality, but young enough that life is in most ways still a pleasure to live -- the idea of an anti-aging pill is incredibly seductive.

      Look, if such a pill came on the market tomorrow, you could always refuse to take it; and if you took it, and later decided that you didn't want to go on forever, you could always kill yourself (which would probably, given the nature of medical treatment, be as simple as "stop taking the pill.") But I've always kind of suspected that most of the neo-Luddites who bleat about how terrible immortality would be will be the first in line at the pharmacy once Ageastatin(tm) goes on sale.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    31. Re:Why? by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      I see it as being about options - if you're tired of it all and just want to decay away into nothingness, good on you. Have a good time. I may do the same next century, or I may not. Right now nobody has a choice - if you're lucky you get 70 or so good years of life followed by inevitable decay.

      I'd just like to be the one in charge of that issue (to the exent that random accidents allow, anyway).

    32. Re:Why? by Hatta · · Score: 0

      But think of all the pot you could smoke.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    33. Re:Why? by Gyan · · Score: 1, Funny

      Forget the pot, think of all the acid you could trip on...

    34. Re:Why? by Brushfireb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and then think of what a waste of immortality that would be.

    35. Re:Why? by sckeener · · Score: 1

      Well, aren't we talking about Longevity not memory?

      Sounds like the key to enjoying eternity is forgetting enough to enjoy it.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    36. Re:Why? by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 1

      I think the gains in fields researching something like senile dementia will be slight. I suspect the brain just isn't built for the long haul. Working in the healthcare industry I've seen that living long is not necessarily the same as living well.

      However, something like Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria definitely would benefit from this research. This syndrome doesn't get a lot of publicity ( I was first exposed to it while watching The X-Files of all things ), but it causes its victims to age at greatly accelerated rates ( ~7x ). Victims will often pass away as children or teens - from old age.

      There are only about 30 to 40 known cases worldwide according to the above link, so I'm not surprised nobody has mentioned it yet in this thread, but I think it would be the real A1 gold-star candidate for this kind of life extension research.

      YLFI

      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
    37. Re:Why? by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if being treated as an invalid as most people in a home

      From what I understand, long term care in places of last resort is not nice. Care is generally minimal, to reduce cost.

      A financial advisor I had once suggested that I go visit some of these homes and then decide how much to save for retirement.

      In his words,

      "I wouldn't keep chickens in the conditions of some of those places."
      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    38. Re:Why? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      I'm not likely to decide that there's no point listening to any new music just because it's all been done before.

      However, I amm afraid to write new music because it has all been done before, and the major music publishers have a larger legal budget than I have.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    39. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who truly has no idea what they are talking about.

    40. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up Tyler.

    41. Re:Why? by portforward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, he didn't spoil the ending. Not even close. Great movie. Enjoy!

    42. Re:Why? by bluFox · · Score: 1

      may be by the time we feel thoroughly bored, we could die by choice,
      that wont be too bad considering the fact that you have seen all you want to see and had utilized the life to the full.

      --
      ~561
    43. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's when you hope the senility will kick in.

    44. Re:Why? by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      I, for one, would like to get old without all that awful growing old stuff; what's the point of hitting 90 if you've got a huge probability of ending up barely able to function?

      Immortality may not be such a hot idea for a human, but I would sure like to have the option of a few more centuries... hell, my first couple of decades were hardly fun, I think I deserve a bit of extra time :P

      We just need to deal with that whole overpopulation thing -- maybe I'll settle for living long enough to be transcribed into a virtual world :)

    45. Re:Why? by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

      i think this was all covered rather nicely in the documentary rondo the highlander.

      as you can see, once you're immortal and undergone training by sean connery, life becomes an endless series of swordfights and explosions.

      so, in conclusion - don't undergo swordfight training, even if it's a zillion AD and you're on some other planet - thank you.

      --
      Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
    46. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be happy to have immortality as long as it was possible for me to self-terminate at some point. True immortality, where you live for an infinite amount of time with no way to die, I wouldn't wish on anybody. Watch all the great movies, yes --- but how are you going to feel a trillion years from now when the entire universe has turned into dark matter and you're floating in nothingness?

    47. Re:Why? by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Are you crazy? Death is a mug's game, I got so much to live for!

    48. Re:Why? by QuidamBrujah · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the 21st would be a drag. If you've done any traveling around the globe you start to see that within each cultural region they all have their own version of mini-malls, starbucks or dirt-trails.

      How many starbucks do you need to visit?

      I was in Singapore recently and I have to agree with Louis Black about the abundance of Starbucks pointing to the 'end of the universe' but I have to disagree with the location--it's in Singapore, not Houston. There are nearly 40 Starbucks in Singapore (which has a little over 4 million people for its' 637.5 sq km of land area) which is about 157 people/sq km/Starbucks. If you stand in the right spot, you can actually see a Starbucks in any field-of-vision/direction you look.

      The other posters have it right about leaving this planet and doing something REALLY different. And being immortal, I wouldn't have to worry about whether I'd live to see it.

      --
      (of course that's just my opinion: I could be wrong)
    49. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probability = number of successfull attempts / total number of attempts... oops. Division by zero...

    50. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thoughts? you are fucking religishitty.

    51. Re:Why? by evilWurst · · Score: 1

      "we do enough damage in the short lives we already have. I don't see much point in longer lives untill we have grown enough to do positive things with that time."

      Turn the question around. Ask yourself if unthinking people who live only in the short term would change if they knew with absolute certainty that they would have to live with all their decisions - forever. Experience the results firsthand by living it yourself and seeing your descendants suffer, and feel them secondhand through the wrath of your peers if you've really botched things. Physical, mental, and social feedback.

      It's been argued before that the ultimate lack of accountability that death grants is part of why people are so irresponsible. Party today, for tomorrow we die.

    52. Re:Why? by da55id · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that Peter Diamandis of XPrize fame is one of the advisors to the mouse prize?

    53. Re:Why? by falzer · · Score: 1

      You could always create something (or many things) of your own.

    54. Re:Why? by Lost+Race · · Score: 1
      hoard = stash
      horde = crowd

      You're welcome.

    55. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's with every comment that has been moderated as "Funny" as also being moderated "Overrated" for this story?

      7032187
      7032292
      7032209
      7032425
      7032170
      7032460
      7032379
      7032190

      It seems that some moderators want to kill people's karma for posting funny comments, since -1 Overrated takes away karma, but +1 Funny doesn't add it.

      If the moderators don't personally like seeing funny comments, isn't this what the "Extra 'Funny' Modifier" option is for?

    56. Re:Why? by Stiletto · · Score: 1


      There are other reasons to resist a life-extending pill. It is likely that these pills, like AIDS drugs and other life-saving devices, will be very expensive, allowing only the very rich to live longer, widening the already huge standard-of-living gap between the rich an the poor.

    57. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well the verse-chorus-verse-chorus-twiddlybit-repeatchorust ofade formula has gotten old and boring to a lot of people. What do you think of experimental music and song structure? The same old song structure has gotten old to a lot of people, but to those not living for music (the masses) they still find it quite charming. In time I can imagine everyone realizing how repetetive it is.

      It's not just that song structure either, at some point every catchy tune you ever hear will be almost exactly like everyone you ever heard. People like certain chords, and other people know this, and can write music that they know will be catchy, however simple it may be.

    58. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would be very hard to waste time with immortality. You have unlimited time, enough to satisfy any need or want. If he just smoked pot for 1 million years, he'd still have infinite years to do something you may consider a good use of time.

      If you literally mean a waste of immortality, then that's philosophical or theological. Whose really to say who is more qualified to live forever? What's the purpose of life? Blah blah. That's for the people tripping acid for their immortal life to think about.

    59. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask that question again on D-1 where D = the day you die.

      Screw death, immortality rocks and its why all those morse and pissy vampire movie tick me off. I'd love to have been alive to see the world from 0 to now. Think of all the things you would have seen. Life changes constantly- technology, art, science, philosophy, literature-- none are static. I'd love to see all those things 200 years from now.

      Only problem would be the overcrowding thing but we're just talking about my immortality, right?

    60. Re:Why? by luckyguesser · · Score: 0, Troll

      I agree. People are accustomed to what they already know.. I suppose that can be restated as "people are afraid of change".
      Since everything that has a beginning has an end, an immortal would forever be watching things end. Now, if you were motivated, you could create things yourself, or keep things from ending (like support efforts toward saving endangered species).

      --


      The power of Christ compiles you.
      A Random Blog
    61. Re:Why? by SlamMan · · Score: 1

      Who says I didn't mean it that way?

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    62. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Differences in sense of humor?

      What one person may see as side-splitting-funny, another may see as banal, not get it, or think it's just plain unfunny.

      Sorry for the OT continuation, but that's why they made AC....

    63. Re:Why? by MacGod · · Score: 1
      I for one feel that imortality would be more of a curse than a blessing. Thoughts?

      I agree that immortality would be a curse. However, a 200 year lifespan? Or 500? Maybe not so much. Might give us more time to relax and get the same amount accomplished, or alternately, to really explore our field of interest.

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    64. Re:Why? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      By that logic, we shouldn't develop any medications, because they're too expensive for poor people to buy. Again, silliness. Medicines, like every other technological product, start out expensive and get cheaper over time. (Yes, even with drug patents; they do expire, you know.) I'm not happy with the gap between the haves and the have-nots, at all; but that gap is not a reason to freeze progress.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    65. Re:Why? by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Well, my music collection's certainly pretty diverse. There's a place for everything, really - some days you want to listen to minimal burbling noises, other days you just can't beat a bit of Motown. No point getting snobbish about it.

    66. Re:Why? by gilmour14 · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, but if the rich never die and the poor do, wouldn't that be similar to survival of the fittest? Eventually everyone would be rich!

    67. Re:Why? by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      That's all very well provided you're immortal and young. However to date improvements to life expectancy haven't really resulted in more time for people at the prime of life, but rather more years of old age. What's the point of living to 150 if you're basically decrepit from the age of 70 or 80?

  9. Builtin cancer genes shortens life? by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    A former girlfriend told me, that all laboratory mice and rats are descendants of mice which develop cancer after some time, cutting the normal life span of that animals to a half. Could that be true? Now this longivity contest would remedy the malice, it introduced beforehand.

    1. Re:Builtin cancer genes shortens life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A former girlfriend told me that she was the Queen of Sheba.

      I guess it just goes to show.

    2. Re:Builtin cancer genes shortens life? by miodekk · · Score: 1

      Average wild mouse lives up to one year.
      Only laboratory mice live longer.

    3. Re:Builtin cancer genes shortens life? by AlecC · · Score: 1

      No. There are, indeed, strains of laboratory mice with "built-in" canacer, to make it easy to do cancer research. But there are plenty of other strains which have not had such things bres into them, and are "normal" - so far as that can apply to lines that are highly inbred for predictability.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    4. Re:Builtin cancer genes shortens life? by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 0

      Assuming what you say is true:

      1) Go out and catch two wild mice
      2) Breed
      3) Sell to labs
      4) Profit!

      As there is no ?? stage, this makes it very likely that the original assumption is false. Sorry.

      --
      wot no sig
  10. article's is wrong! by borgdows · · Score: 1

    The *real* oldest mouse is here !

  11. i predict by bongobongo · · Score: 2, Funny

    some team will back a mouse that never dies. but within 10 years every part of its body will have been replaced at one time or another....

    mousenstein.

    (you can welcome our undead mouse overlords if you want but i won't be held responsible for lost karma)

    1. Re:i predict by bramez · · Score: 1

      if you replace the brain it would not be the same mouse anymore, except if you can transfer the brain pattern which make up the mouse's unique behaviour (identity?). Would you go for a "brain pattern transplant" where your brain structure is rebuild in another brain? It would be a perfect mimic of you, but it wouldn't be you.

    2. Re:i predict by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1
      It would be a perfect mimic of you, but it wouldn't be you.

      But wouldn't it, though? If a piece of counterfeit money is absolutely, utterly indistinguishable from the Real Thing, is it still fake? If nobody, not even you, could tell the difference between yourself and your duplicate, what about the duplicate makes him a forgery?

      --
      Dyolf Knip
  12. Really an Award for Best Ear Transplant Technique by Eponymous+Cowboy · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the Methuselah Mouse FAQ on how they will prove the mice are as old as is claimed:
    Our approach is to use special identification tags. ... attached to the ear in such a way that they cannot be undetectably re-attached after breakage, so it is impossible to attach one to a younger mouse.
    Obviously, therefore, the way to win this contest is to develop a way to successfully transplant mouse ears without leaving a noticeable scar.
    --
    It's hard for thee to kick against the pricks.
  13. Is 150 in human years a surprise? by zebadee · · Score: 1, Funny

    Afterall most mice seem to follow doctors orders with a healthy diet of seed/fruit/veg and plenty of wheel running exersise.

    1. Re:Is 150 in human years a surprise? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      But then are the mice whose doctor's orders are to eat many times their body weight of saccarin, lipstick, etc.

  14. I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse! by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bits List:

    1x Mouse
    1X Space Ship

    Insturctions:

    Insert mouse A into Space Ship B. Launch Space Ship B into orbit around the sun. Speed up space ship B to near the speed of light. Allow relitivity to do it's work. Bring space ship back to earth at desired point, and remove very old mouse A.

  15. Out of the IBM support database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ESD PRODUCT SERVICE SUPPORT SUBJECT:NEW RETAIN TIP

    Record number: H031944
    Device: D/T8550
    Model: M
    Hit count: UHC00000
    Success count: USC00000
    Publication code: PC50
    Tip key: 025
    Date created: O89/02/14
    Date last altered: A89/02/15
    Owning B.U.: USA

    Abstract: MOUSE BALLS NOW AVAILABLE AS FRU (Field Replaceable Unit)

    TEXT:

    Mouse balls are now available as a FRU. If a mouse fails to operate,or should perform erratically, it may be in need of ball replacement. Because of the delicate nature of this procedure, replacement of mouse balls should be attempted by trained personnel only.

    Before ordering,determine type of mouse balls required by examining the underside of each mouse. Domestic balls will be larger and harder than foreign balls. Ball removal procedures differ,depending upon manufacturer of the mouse. Foreign balls can be replaced using the pop-off method, and domestic balls replaced using the twist-off method. Mouse balls are not usually static sensitive, however, excessive handling can result in sudden discharge. Upon completion of ball replacement, the mouse may be used immediately.

    It is recommended that each servicer have a pair of balls for maintaining optimum customer satisfaction,and that any customer missing his balls should suspect local personnel of removing these necessary functional items.

    P/N33F8462--DOMESTIC MOUSE BALLS
    P/N33F8461--FOREIGN MOUSE BALLS

    1. Re:Out of the IBM support database by rjch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...I firmly believe that this (extremely) old joke probably contributed more than anything to the invention of the optical mouse...

    2. Re:Out of the IBM support database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All you need is someone with a political background to hear about the "twist-off" method...

    3. Re:Out of the IBM support database by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're sure its not the mechanical complexity, not-cool factor, and difficulty-of-cleaning of wheel mouse that did it?

    4. Re:Out of the IBM support database by s-orbital · · Score: 1

      Of course Optical Mice, being mice without balls, were made for Unix.

      (If you dont get it, read the joke aloud)

      --
      Patent: from Latin patere, to be open
  16. Don't need genetically altered food by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The world is more than able to feed itself with current crops.

    The problem is political instability; wars, local conflicts, corruption, ethnic genocide etc etc. If there were stable governments everywhere using conventional crops, starvation would be eliminated completely.

    Genetically modified crops will make absolutely no difference to famines because yield is not the problem.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by HarryCallahan · · Score: 2, Funny

      That may be true, but just wait till we get all these geriatric mice living well beyond their normal years, who's gonna feed them?

    2. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      "The world is more than able to feed itself with current crops..."

      You are more than right. I wish the radicals in the world would adopt an attitude like yours so that they can express an issue this succulently.

      Thank you.

    3. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Walkiry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>The problem is political instability

      And one way GM foods can help solve that is by allowing crops to grow in less favourable conditions. All that instability is, at the end of the day, just a hinderance to distribution. If we can make it easier to better grow crops locally, so much the better.

      Also GM food can help in some other ways. You might have heard about the Golden Rice, a variety of rice that contains a high amount of A-vitamin and could be a great help to prevent its deficiency (which is quite a bit of a problem in many areas of Africa and South-East Asia).

      We might not need it per se, but it sure is a nifty and useful tool to more easily solve certain problems.

      --
      ---- Take the Space Quiz!
    4. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by mothrathegreat · · Score: 1
      This is all true but I dont see how a competition involving mice would have so much to do with feeding the world. If they wanted to make a competition for the most resilient crop plants then that would be more sensible and wouldn't take nearly as long.

      Btw. You are more than right. I wish the radicals in the world would adopt an attitude like yours so that they can express an issue this succulently.
      I wish I could express an issue succulently

      --
      Extended Warranty? How can I lose!
    5. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And... eating meat.
      With the resources (land, water, food) needed to make a meat-based meal (with current techniques), you can make more than an order of magnitude more planet-based meals out of those same reqources!

    6. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by robklaus · · Score: 1

      An article from the atlantic on this subject. I'm not sure if it contradicts what you are saying, but is interesting.

    7. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny
      all these geriatric mice living well beyond their normal years
      and wittering on about how the cats in their days were twice as big, three times as fast and had 98 claws.
      And they had to make their own cheese. That's if they were lucky...
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can feed ourselves NOW, with 6 billion people. The more people, the less space to grow crops becaues the more space is taken up by habitation and other non-agricultural facilities needed by the growing population, and the harder it is to distribute food. The strife of food distribution leading to local shortage increases political instability.

    9. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      The world is more than able to feed itself with current crops.

      And Ford was able to make enough cars for the entire world's population by hand... Of course, a lot more people died in those ancient factories due to increased human exposure to the risks involved in moving heavy equipment around, etc. And the practice was very wasteful - requiring huge factories for small outputs by today's standards. But, strictly speaking, we could still do it today.

      GM food isn't about feeding everyone. It is about getting the most food from the smallest amount of land possible with the smallest possible number of humans involved. Which would you rather have - 100,000 acres of farmland, or 10,000 acres of farmland and 90,000 acres of AIDS-research facilities? The latter might feed the same number of people with GM crops, and would also help the fight against AIDS (which most anti-GM advocates claim to be for). The fact is that any land devoted to farming is land not devoted to something else.

      If GM crops didn't reduce farming costs there would be no debate about them - nobody would be using them in the first place.

      GM is a tool just like anything else. It can be used responsibly or otherwise. The issue isn't whether we should be doing it, but rather how.

    10. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by 2names · · Score: 1
      Yum, Purina Human Chow.

      Chow Chow Chow!!!

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    11. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by butane_bob2003 · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, and this should be well known by now. No scientific advancement in farming is going to change the way food distribution works. Agriculture in most of the world has become disconnected from the land in a way that is not sustainable (excluding a few countries and cultures). The food industry can't expect to constantly take nutrients from the soil without putting them back naturally. The US destroyed the Great Plains in the 1930s, but has not learned it's lesson about harnessing the land for agriculture. There will always be famine, plague, etc., as long as there are living beings on this planet. If we were capable of controlling our own population, nature would not have to do it for us. This is also why almost every living thing on earth ages and eventually dies. We have to contribute our nutrients back to the soil for the cycle to continue.

      --


      TallGreen CMS hosting
    12. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by replicant108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is interesting that many slashdotters often warn against the encroachment of IP laws on software development, yet seem to be blind to the same issue with regard to agriculture.

      Isn't the right to grow food as important as the rigth to develop software?

      If a program can be contaminated with foreign IP, does the same problem not also apply to a field of crops?

      How beneficial is it to the third world to have the IP rights to the food they grow owned by multi-nationals?

      "We should commercially introduce GM crops, they say, because we need to feed the poor.

      When this argument was first used aggressively by Monsanto in the late 1990s, the poor had other ideas. African delegates from Ethiopia to Burundi, Senegal and Mozambique, at special negotiations of the UN food and agriculture organisation "strongly" objected that "the image of the poor and hungry from our countries is being used by giant multinational corporations to push a technology that is neither safe, environmentally friendly, nor economically beneficial to us""

    13. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sorry...excuse me, but....

      'succulently'?

      Maybe I'm sheltered, but I don't believe I've ever heard that word used in this context before.

    14. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      I guess you missed the food reference.

      Look up the word.

      I felt it was needed.

    15. Re:Don't need genetically altered food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhhhh...a pun, then. I did miss the food reference.

  17. Except... by Tamor · · Score: 1

    Contest organisers insist that clock C travels with mouse A in Space Ship B. Space Ship B returns and organiser's declare mouse to be only 5 minutes older than when it left.

    1. Re:Except... by am+2k · · Score: 1

      5 minutes to go to the sun and back? That's more than twice the light speed, wow.

    2. Re:Except... by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Of course since the organizers are dead at this point, I don't think it really much matters.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    3. Re:Except... by da55id · · Score: 1

      Our plan is to be around due to the success of the prize. We would then be amused that the relativistic mouse would have no owners due to their being dead - even if the mouse was "old", the prize money would have been awarded already. You can't win the longitude prize anymore...Mr. Harrison and his son already walked away with the money.

  18. Computer mouse or... by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

    Took me a bit to realize they were talking about actual rodents. I was really puzzled until then: are they trying to locate the oldest mouse device? Are they artificially aging a computer mouse?

    Winners will receive cash for every day beyond the current record.

    Are we talking about the mouse again? I think some nice cheese would be more appropriate. Although, whatever prize it gets it won't make much of a difference since I'm assuming the prizes are granted post-mouse-mortem. Better make that a cheese allowance for 5 years for wife and kids.

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
    1. Re:Computer mouse or... by iainl · · Score: 1

      No need to award the prize post-mortem. I propose that the prize be a kind of mouse pension, with the oldest mouse in the world being awarded free cheese every day.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Computer mouse or... by da55id · · Score: 1

      The researchers win cash while the mouse/mice is/are still alive. Cheese is optional

  19. Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by Gyan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When DNA is replicated, the transcription occurs not from the start of a strand, but a few "words" into the sequence. Since, this might cut off valuable/active genes, there are telemores "prefixed" to the start of these sequence. These are useless bits of genes that can be safely cut off during cell copying. But as the instance of DNA gets copied more and more, in each succeeding generation, the telomere gets reduced. Eventually coming to the point where during copying, active genes get clipped. The limit is around 50 cell divisions, IIRC. Someone by the age of 60 has roughly 40% of telomere length as compared to birth. There's a gene called telomerase that synthesizes these telomeres at the ends of chromosones. Mice in which telomerase has been re-activated post-infancy have lived thrice as long!!! But there are ill-effects of activating telomerase post-infancy. Cancer tumors require telomerase to work as well. So, it's a double-edged sword. Hope someone figures out a good alternative.

    1. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by jemfinch · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a gene called telomerase that synthesizes these telomeres at the ends of chromosones.


      Telomerase is an enzyme, not a gene. And it prevents the shortening of the telomeres; it doesn't actually lengthen them after they've been shortened.

      Jeremy
    2. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by nimblebrain · · Score: 1

      I've read a few accounts of how the shortening of the telomeres causes troubles. A lot of them seem to have to do with "unravelling" as though the ends were aglets (plastic bits on the end of a shoelace). I believe it was Ben Bova's Immortality (a decent read, although Ben Bova isn't necessarily the be-all end-all of references) talking about how when the telomere is down to its last few hundred base pairs, it attracts a protein that stops cell death transcription in much the same manner as "too much mutation" does, shutting the cell down.

      There's likely an electrical explanation to it somehow as well - strings of G-C have a unique electrical signature. It's posited that pairs and triplets of G-C attract the electron holes that result from chemical/thermal attacks on DNA. Artifical DNA created solely from G-C can actually wind the other way - a form called z-DNA (from a textbook a fair while back). Since the telomere is a repeated TTAGGG, it's possible that it's not just recognized as a starting point for DNA replication, but may act as a 'sacrificial anode' as well.

      New Scientist has an issue this past while with a good series of articles on electrical activity in DNA.

      ...

      So what are we going to do if they succeed? Francis Fukuyama's Our Post-Human Future has some interesting if not terribly "far out" views on the political and human landscape in a life-extended world.

      Personally, I'd be quite happy to celebrate my 200th birthday party, by hook or by crook! You're all invited... if I can afford it by then ;)

      I sure hope antiagathics arrive soon... and get cheap in a hurry :)

      --
      Binary geeks can count to 1,023 on their fingers :)
    3. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by wren337 · · Score: 1

      per New Scientist (a few months ago); rather than using a retrovirus to insert the telomerase gene (so it would stay switched on as it is in 90% of cancer cells), they are looking at using an adenovirus to deliver the sequence temporarily. Specifically for tissue grafts that are cultered in the lab. When they culture skin grafts in vitro the cells wind up with telomere lengths typical of an 80 year old, not cool if the graft is for a child.

      By delivering the sequence with an adenovirus it doesn't stay switched on, you get a "reset" effect on the telomere lengths.

    4. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by dlamming · · Score: 1

      Extending lifespan has (essentially) very little to do with telomerase. In even the longest-lived humans and mice, there's no evidence that the telomere-based cell division limit has been reached.

      That said, it's something we'll need to conquer one day in order to keep extending life. Many (though not all) tumors do indeed have telomerase turned on, and turning on telomerase would probably greatly increase the chance of cancer. And in response to another comment, telomerase does indeed extend telomere length.

      --
      Not only am I a scientist, I play one on TV
    5. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by salesgeek · · Score: 1

      I am not sure my mouse has any dna. It is mostly solid state electronics encased in an attractive case.

      --
      -- $G
    6. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Telomeres are not the 'secret' of immortality. There are a lot of things that gradually wear down or accumulate in the human body (e.g. heavy metals) that cannot be dealth with by normal metabolic function, even in youthful bodies.

      Real immortatlity is going to require active, artificial repair and maintenance systems.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    7. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by antic · · Score: 1

      In other news, sales of miniature walking frames and tiny bi-focals are booming...

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    8. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1
      it prevents the shortening of the telomeres; it doesn't actually lengthen them after they've been shortened

      Actually, telomerase does extend telomere length.

      Also, here's a nice animation of telomerase's action(long, animated gif, may be slow on slow connections)

    9. Re:Works by maintaining/increasing telomere length by dancingmad · · Score: 1
      Haha, undergrad Bio! Enzymes almost always end in ASE!

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
  20. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by akadruid · · Score: 1

    I suspect, given the prize money on offer, that this may not be viable.
    However, if you could develop such a craft, I'm sure you could find a way to make some cash elsewhere.
    Additionally, surely sending the mouse on a trip round the Earth would be easier and cheaper, without affecting the results.

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
  21. Bwaahhaha by simpleguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fsck that! I have a brand new Logiteh MX .. oh wait, never mind.

  22. New Overlords by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new Methuselah Mouse overlords.

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
    1. Re:New Overlords by Throtex · · Score: 1

      I, too, would like to welcome our new geriatric hyper-intelligent pan-dimensional overlords.

    2. Re:New Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which brings up the question what to do with immortality? And, would one bring a towel along when going though the lengths of the universe insulting every living being.... in alpahbetical order? I guess some are just born with the skill required for being immortal and know the answer ;-) On a more serious note, some mice will die a horrible death during these experiments, or end up looking rather odd...

    3. Re:New Overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, next time I have modpoints I'm using every single one of them to mod down any of these I see. I suggest anyone else feeling the same do so as well. At least the soviet russia jokes were at times clever, the overlord jokes could be produced with a tiny script and are just annoying. Ironically, the hitchikers overlord joke is the first one I've seen that required any actual thought at all...and so of course it's not been rated up while the script-like one is +5.

    4. Re:New Overlords by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

      For what it's worth, next time I have modpoints I'm using every single one of them to mod down any of these I see. I suggest anyone else feeling the same do so as well. At least the soviet russia jokes were at times clever, the overlord jokes could be produced with a tiny script and are just annoying. Ironically, the hitchikers overlord joke is the first one I've seen that required any actual thought at all...and so of course it's not been rated up while the script-like one is +5.

      I, for one, welcome our new Modding-down-without-a-sense-of-humor Overlords!

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
  23. How about NOT experimenting on them for a while by Audent · · Score: 0

    That would seem to help with your average lab rat's life expectancy...

    I'd also vote for: not growing ears on them, not pushing them through mazes to get their food, not testing drugs on them, not electrocuting them to test their reaction time, letting them get enough sleep/sex/food/water...

    that alone would probably give them a few good years. Anyone?

    --
    I am a leaf on the wind
    1. Re:How about NOT experimenting on them for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, lesse now... since the question was a humorous one and was being treated as such, I guess that makes you the biggest weiner here.

      crawl back under your rock, you fourteen year old dork.

    2. Re:How about NOT experimenting on them for a while by Maddog+Batty · · Score: 4, Informative

      That would seem to help with your average lab rat's life expectancy...

      Unfortunately not. Half starving them does seem to improve life expectancy.

      dogs monkeys

      --
      wot no sig
    3. Re:How about NOT experimenting on them for a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh no. That'll mean Anna Wintour is immortal!

  24. This is the kind of research I like to see. by ahfoo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've long been disappointed that biotech is so damn conservative about trying to just go for it and take some chances. We're all dying after all. It's like the absurdity of cancer therapies that can't be tried on terminally patients because they might have side effects. Jesus Christ on a crutch, that's like some kind of absurd joke
    Indeed, I'm testing the waters of bionformatics myself lately so I can stop compaining and do something about it. But that's another story.
    What caught my eye was the thing about being able to use stem cells. The whole stem cell story is so amazing and yet it seems that there's this amazing potential and nobody wants to try anything amazing with it. The attitude is like, yes this is amazing but we can't use it in amazing ways because it's experimental and we don't know what might happen.
    If I had a research budget and I was in this competition, my idea would be to create embryonic stem cells of my mouse and just inject them into the thing like it was a pin cushion. Damn the torpedos.
    So what's the worse things that's going to happen? A dead lab rat? What if the thing stays young forever? Let's pick up the pace people!

    1. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by evrybodygonsurfin · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's like the absurdity of cancer therapies that can't be tried on terminally patients because they might have side effects.


      Insightful point indeed. Presumably you make this from the perspective of someone who has watched a loved one suffering from terminal cancer be pumped full of toxic chemicals to the very limit of their mortal capabilities and then subjected to near-fatal doses of radiation in an attempt to lengthen their existance?



      Given these circumstances, it is baffling that patients aren't queuing up to be guniea-pigs for the less `conservative' experimental therapies.

    2. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by CGP314 · · Score: 1, Funny

      So what's the worse things that's going to happen? A dead lab rat? What if the thing stays young forever? Let's pick up the pace people!

      No kidding!

      If the effectiveness of longevity treatments doesn't outpace my rate of decay, I'm going to be a very unhappy customer of the universe.

    3. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by bundaegi · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Keywords are palliative treatment, quality of life.
      Need to be balanced with patient's choice (or their relatives?) but if the prognosis is bleak then maybe it's more important to spend quality time with your loved ones rather than enduring agressive treatment that's not going to be effective anyway.

      Oh yeah... trials on terminal patients. Maybe people like grandparent (and those who modded him up) don't see the ethical issues involved. Sad it came from somebody involved in bioinformatics. Don't you guys have any philosophy lectures anymore? even basic stuff?
      Simply put, what next? you are given permission to start trials on patients who are going to die after all, then what? trials on prisoners? soldiers? random population sample? Thinking about it, it's not like this hasn't been tried before...

      --
      bundaegi is good for you
    4. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new immortal mouse overlords!

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    5. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by kinnell · · Score: 4, Funny
      So what's the worse things that's going to happen?

      A giant, carniverous, mutant super mouse, bent on world domination and the enslavement of the human race to work in it's underground cheese mines.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    6. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 3, Insightful
      So what's the worse things that's going to happen? A dead lab rat?

      They might take your budget away for showing that you didn't really have a clue about biology? They aren't a magic wand. Take stem cell treatment for hearts for example - you have to have highly specific growth conditions in the laboratory culturure dishes to coax stem cells into developing as vascular cells. They're not just going to have a look round and think 'when in the heart, do as the heart cells do'.

    7. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by ramk13 · · Score: 1

      Hey, I've got the same idea as you, but I can see why a lot of others are so reserved. Some people who are religious equate stem cell research with abortion. (even if a fetus is already dead) It doesn't make a whole lot of sense from our perspective, but that's why it's not our perspective.

    8. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh christ, not you too... This place is deteriorating by the numbers.

    9. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by nautical9 · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome... ah nevermind.

    10. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by ahfoo · · Score: 0

      Hey, just for the record as I sometimes reply to my own posts as an AC, that wasn't me.
      But speaking of personal issues, I would like to clarify that I have an MA in Rhetoric and my thesis chair was the head of the Philosophy Department. So, yeah I have a fairly decent background in philosophy as a matter of fact and I obviously don't see any conflicts between "philosophy" and my position. I think you're confusing philosophy with moralism.

    11. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Presumably you make this from the perspective of someone who has watched a loved one suffering from terminal cancer be pumped full of toxic chemicals to the very limit of their mortal capabilities and then subjected to near-fatal doses of radiation in an attempt to lengthen their existance?

      Well I am, and if I were ever in the unfourtunate position as the theoretical person the parent mentions, I'd say bring it on.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    12. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by frission · · Score: 1

      someone has been watching Pinky & The Brain too much...

    13. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Mr+Fodder · · Score: 1
    14. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If the patient is of sound mind then they should be provided enough information to make an informed decision. Then leave it up to them. If they want to just die in peace that is fine. If they want to pump themselves full of every concoction imaginable by men, that should be fine as well as long as somebody is willing to foot the bill.

      As far as testing prisoner or soldiers, etc, goes, I'm all for testing anyone provided they are given a choice.

      What starts getting interesting is when a prisoner is given a choice like "if you volunteer for this clinical trial we'll knock 10 years off your time". Society is trading the risk of the prisoner killing somebody once they get out 10 years earlier for the reward of potential medical benefits. The prisoner is trading personal health risk for a lighter sentence.

    15. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so ignorant it makes my brain hurt really bad. How old are you?
      What's even worse is that yourpost is modded up. I had hopes for /.

    16. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one welcome our giant, cheese-eating overlords.

    17. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 1

      Hey - how about trials on anyone who agrees to it and can be shown to be of sound mind? Oooh! What a concept!

      Not all slopes are slippery, dammit.

    18. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      Look on the bright side - at least we'd have a properly funded moon program.

      Just my $0.02,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    19. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Shazow · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this contest is one of the evil schemes of that big headed mouse to achieve immortality and take over the world!! Mwhahaha!

      *Chorus* The pinky, the pinky and the brain brain brain brain brain brain brain brain brain.... *Chorus*

      - shazow

    20. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by bundaegi · · Score: 1
      Point taken. Having some limited experience working in hospitals (yeah, this is /. after all, anything is possible) I have this feeling that sometimes doctors aren't totally honest with their patients. So they promise some kind of miraculous cure (even sometimes believing themselves it would work) which more than likely the patient (or as I said their relatives) will want to try out. So there they go, enduring the most aggressive form of therapy... and to what result? well, maybe helping those patients die decently would've better for them. For doctors of course, it's more like... well we tried everything that was humanly (humanely?) possible and here's the bill and gee won't that look great in my CV when I publish my results (whatever they are).

      Yes, I know I am being sarcastic since doctors often don't even have a choice anymore. Whatever treatment they will prescribe, they'll probably get sued anyway by said relatives of the deceased.

      Hey, in my days you had to take philosophy whether you wanted or not. Helps balance that scientist's urge to try things, I guess. That's what I wanted to say ;-)

      --
      bundaegi is good for you
    21. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I took philosophy because I wanted to meet the great ideas. What a laugh. Tbe most rediculous part is that I ended up with an A. I couldn't even read most of the text, and the arguments that they made seemed to be always shallow. Like Berkeley's assertion that since things only existed when they were being observed, and they continued to exist, that proved the existence of god. Excuse me, God. He was certain that it proved the existence of not only a god, but of his God. Whereas he never really proved his original thesis. (OTOH Johnson's "Thus I refute Berkeley!" wasn't much better.)

      Still, those ideas underlie quantuum physics. It's questionable if without them quantuum physics would yet be understood. But they could have done as good a job of arguing their points by presenting them embedded in fiction (science fiction in their case).

      And "Natural Law"! An apalling morass of misguided assertions, where people prove their conclusions by their assumptions. And don't notice it.

      Now I certainly haven't read everything. Perhaps the class specifically selected the silliest philosophers. Like Leibnitz. Kant. Etc. Or perhaps the professor didn't understand them either. But I found Kabbala to be clearer. At least there one knew that the associations were probably arbitrary.

      If one were to attempt to develop a sound ethical philosophy, I would advocate starting from ethology rather than from philosophy. Then add in some game theory and some evolution. But don't expect to like the result. If you do, then your goals will corrupt your conclusions, because so much really is subjective choice, and you've got to notice those places, and except all the logical paths as valid, not just the one you favor.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    22. Re:This is the kind of research I like to see. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One hyphenated word:

      opt-in.

      If I was terminal, I'd sure as hell sign up for crazy experimental treatments that might cause me to grow a third arm.

      Why the hell not? There's a slim chance it'll work. There's a large chance it'd provide more benefit for humanity as a whole than anything else I've ever done.

  25. Narrrf! by spumoni_fettuccini · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Errr... What are we gonna do tonight Brain? The same thing we do every night Pinky... keep up with the Jones rabbits.

    I raised mice for several years and they [small gene pool] got more and more inbred resulting in cancers and other problems. I would think to avoid tumors and short life spans [which I had problems with], one would need a large breeding stock and keep a new influx of genetic material.

    --
    -- Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.
    1. Re:Narrrf! by Illserve · · Score: 1

      Scientists, it turns out, are smart.

      Consequently, there are people who's job is to do just this.

      Check out Charles River Labs.

    2. Re:Narrrf! by jw32767 · · Score: 1

      Nearly all mice used in scientific research are highly imbred mice. Most scientists won't use mice that aren't sister/brother inbred for at least 40 generations.

      Why you ask? After that many imbreedings, the mice are 99.9%+ genetically identical so the research is able to be duplicated with different mice from the same strain.

      --

      Josh Winslow
  26. what about this genius? by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does it count?

    How about this apple mouse?

    --
    "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
    1. Re:what about this genius? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I still have a blocky serial Genius in active use. It has three buttons like any proper mouse does, but otherwise it's similar to the one in the picture. It's not obsolete by any means, though I'd prefer a PS/2 connector to get that serial port free.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:what about this genius? by Unominous+Coward · · Score: 1

      I used to have a mouse similar to the Genius in that picture, but with three buttons. It was an absolute shocker. You had to push so hard to get the buttons to press.

      I'm happy with my Intellimouse Explorer 3 :)

      --
      "Smoking helps you lose weight - one lung at a time" -- A. E. Neumann
  27. Microsoft rocked it by jedrek · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have a white, Microsoft two button mouse that my parents bought to use with our AT&T6300 in '88 (8086 power). It has an adapter which lets you switch between bus and serial mode. The bus cord was used with the bus card - remember when you used an extra card to hook up a mouse?

    Anyway, it still works. One of the buttons is pushed in a bit and I should clean it, but it still works.

  28. Ethyl methane sulfonate as an alkylating agent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name that immortal quote.

    1. Re:Ethyl methane sulfonate as an alkylating agent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. Didn't even have to google it. Useless though - creates a virus IIRC.

  29. Methuselah Joke by akadruid · · Score: 0, Troll

    MOUSE BALLS NOW AVAILABLE AS FRU (Field Replaceable Unit)

    Not only is this one not true, it's so damn old it rates it's own prize for age.
    Could you not have managed it in less than 1000 lines too please?

    --
    "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    1. Re:Methuselah Joke by watzinaneihm · · Score: 4, Funny

      No. Snopes says its true. But even IBM meant it as a joke.

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    2. Re:Methuselah Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi? I,m 46 years old malted balls vatted in JAPAN I,ve got drunk tonite an happened to finfd this site. And found yours. I,m on my way to learn how to write. Plesa keep on going Goooooooooooooood nite

  30. The oldest mouse is... by Ckwop · · Score: 1

    Bo Jangles, out of the green mile.. hehehe..

    1. Re:The oldest mouse is... by donnyspi · · Score: 0

      He's a circus mouse!

  31. any technique ? by selderrr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Researchers can use any technique to boost longevity

    Flash freezing ?

    1. Re:any technique ? by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Freezing the mouse is easy. Getting it to go for a walk after you've defrosted it is a little more problematical. I think they'd want to see it move before they'd give you the money.

    2. Re:any technique ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a better one. My technique is call generational replacement. Lab mice are purebred, so what's the different?

    3. Re:any technique ? by Telcontar · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether I trust cryogenics yet. I have yet to see any positive report on the cryogenics-users mailing list ;-)

    4. Re:any technique ? by Atario · · Score: 1

      Life-support machines (Heart-lung, etc.)?

      Organ transplants?

      Copy it into a computer and wind up with Mouxe Headroom?

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    5. Re:any technique ? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Not only that, they want to see videos of it moving *every day*. Somehow I doubt your mouse would appreciate being frozen every evening and thawed every morning...

  32. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't the age of the mouse be just the same as a normal mouse? It wouldn't experience a longer life, it'd just be like the equivelant of crossing a 20 year time zone. Do mice get jet lag?

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  33. Re:you are is wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    haha fanboy, Apple was just a fruit when this mouse came out

    http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/Archive/patent /Mouse.html

  34. The fools by Bertie · · Score: 1, Funny

    Five years? Pah. They've a long, long way to go before they match John Coffey's mad mouse resurrection skillz in The Green Mile...

  35. ObQuote by Monsieur_F · · Score: 1

    Are you pondering what I'm pondering ?

    --
    McCartney fans pay bus tickets. [...] Lennon fans too, with discretion.
    1. Re:ObQuote by iainl · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think so Brain, but if they called them "sad meals", kids wouldn't buy them.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  36. here it is by ch-chuck · · Score: 2, Informative

    At lease here's Doug Engelbart's patent on the mouse - don't know if a 1964 prototype still exists or not.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  37. You pathetic wimpy pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Spare your sentiment for the hungry and ill people on this planet that die because pussies like you can't see a mouse in a lab.

    1. Re:You pathetic wimpy pussy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hungry and ill people will always die, no matter what we do to mice.

  38. Re:Really an Award for Best Ear Transplant Techniq by billybob2001 · · Score: 1, Funny

    They've done that already

    I predict the solution will involve "The final front-ear", or something.

  39. But the basic assumption is flawed by taaminator · · Score: 1

    Actually, I think the opposite is true.

    "Free" lab rats have a two year life expectancy.

    A researcher [Dr. R. Moss, I think] discovered that when lab rats are studied in the lab, their life expectancy reduces from two years to 1.5 years.

    As a consequence, studies 'based upon tests conducted on laboratory rats' are flawed on face value by 25%. [Apologies to statisticians and mathematicians for that tainted math.]

    Note on the obvious: When you see a report that something causes a rat to die at OVER age 18 months, it is a life extender.

    1. Re:But the basic assumption is flawed by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Funny

      Any "free" rat or mouse in my garden has a life expectancy of about 30 seconds, once the resident feline AWACS detects its presence.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    2. Re:But the basic assumption is flawed by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm gonna go catch a rat and win a prize!

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  40. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard time and gravity have something to do with each other. I doubt anyone can afford relativistic speeds at this point, but maybe an extremely powerful centrifuge?

  41. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by reddish · · Score: 1

    A cunning plan, were it not for the fact that mouse A would actually be younger than you would naively expect.

    I suggest this course of action only when there will be a contest for the highest-mass mouse :-)

  42. Wet the sponge! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 0

    Pff, I can't believe the article neglected to mention Mr. Jingles.

  43. Human Immortality by Famatra · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Human immortality sounds good, but the human population is already exploding and thats *with* people dying off. If a large number of people are going to become immortal then we need population controls in place, or at least teaching how birth control is used in school ;).

    1. Re:Human Immortality by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      It's not exploding in Europe, or Japan. There's even one political party in the UK calling on people to have more babies.

    2. Re:Human Immortality by bedurndurn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not necessarily, we could just start killing off those people peskily reproducing elsewhere. I mean really, would you miss India?

    3. Re:Human Immortality by tid242 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Human immortality sounds good, but the human population is already exploding and thats *with* people dying off. If a large number of people are going to become immortal then we need population controls in place, or at least teaching how birth control is used in school ;).

      this is the kind of rhetoric i hear all of the time, as if people who live to be 1000 years old will still think it's necessary to start having kids when they're 20 and keep having them until they die (actually, in certain religious circles they might, which is pretty damn scary for us apostates).

      the most obvious fallicy in all of this is that immortality will be available for everyone. Compare treatments for HIV with what you can probably (and rightly) assume about any hypothetical immortality-treatments - who has access to antiretroviral therapy? - allow me to name countries: USA, Japan, UK, Germany, Italy, France, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Canada, etc, etc,. Notice anything odd about said selection of countries? Perhaps that they house about 10% of the world's population, have less than 5% of the world's HIV(+) population, and oh, by the way, they also control about 90% of the world's wealth. Now think of a hypothetical anti-aging pill (about the least-likely route of administration of anti-aging therapy, if you ask me), who do you suppose will have it first? - i'd guess the US and Western Europe (who pretty much all have negative population growths as it is (excluding immigration)), guess who'll own the rights to said therapy? - i'd guess US and/or Western European companies, Guess how much it'll cost? - i'd guess probably a whole lot more than most people in the US and Western Europe can afford, let alone people dying of diarrhea in 3rd world countries. Sure the price might eventually come down to levels affordable by "everyone" but that doesn't change the fact that most people world-wide die of nothing that has much at all to do with ageing.

      Even in the US, it is questionable whether many of the biggest killers are really directly caused by ageing, cancer is really the only one that comes to mind that probably is. Heart disease, Diabetes, suicide, accidents, and almost all of the others on the top 10 (for any age group apart from cancer) can't be said to be caused by being old, they may be time-dependent processes, but it doesn't mean that the physiological changes associated with ageing causes them...

      anyway, just a thought (or two).

      -tid242

      --

      With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    4. Re:Human Immortality by loosewing · · Score: 0

      Actually people living longer is already a fact. Our ancestors lived barely half our current lifespan. Diet, medical treatment and enviroment have helped us along for a while.

      But if asked, what would early hominids have thought about longer lifespan?

      Early Hominid 1: Uggggh. Live Longer? Errg. Chase buffalo and reindeer many many seasons. Urrrg. Can get to hear many shaman stories. Then errr, eat many many berries for many spriings... ehhh then chase arounf female many many more years. Dunno.

      Early Hominid 2: Uggghg. After while get bored with buffalo. After while get bored with berries. Err after while can predict ending of shaman stories. After while get sick and tired of same buffalo dung from female...beside urrrg. planet be filled with ten thousand smelly people like you.

      Early Hominid 1: Urrggg- hey them fighting words...

    5. Re:Human Immortality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good side of an over-populated planet would be a great drive toward space exploration. What better excuse to colonize mars than we have too because earth is full?

    6. Re:Human Immortality by da55id · · Score: 1

      Even the religious would be in synch with this if they read about Methuselah etc. They would find that folks had children much later than now. Just what you'd expect...funny eh? And, I think it's true that the longer the lifespan in the west, the later the average date for the first birth...hmmm

    7. Re:Human Immortality by register_ax · · Score: 1
      Guess how much it'll cost? - i'd guess probably a whole lot more than most people in the US and Western Europe can afford, let alone people dying of diarrhea in 3rd world countries.

      I'm not sure how many people followed this, but really, diarrhea is a leading cause of death for children worldwide. It is the result of dehydration and contaminated water supplies and results in over 2 million deaths annually.

      http://www.who.int/health-topics/diarrhoeal.htm

      I'll rationalize my obsessive desire at making sure the AC is on just the right centrigrade, will lead to a breakthrough discovery that will allow every country to be as it wants to be immediately. ;)

  44. The Oldest Mouse Contest by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    "On your mark... Get set.... age!"

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:The Oldest Mouse Contest by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "On your mark... Get set.... age!"

      And thousands of mice are patiently waiting for the Slashdotting to subscribe...

    2. Re:The Oldest Mouse Contest by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Subside I mean.

      Blah.

      I just lost my funny mods. :(

  45. Because by varjag · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What I don't see is if we really would like to live much longer. I for one feel that imortality would be more of a curse than a blessing.

    One nice thing of immortality is that you always can opt-out.

    Seriously, I don't mind living a spare century or two. YMMV, of course.

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  46. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 1, Funny

    " mouse A would actually be younger than you would naively expect."

    I was expecting to have Mouse A circle the Sun for at least 5000 years.

    My Back-up plan involves Mouse D, Klingon Ship E and Star Trek crew F...

    Ok, I'll stop now.

    (No Whales were harmed in the typing of this post)

  47. The next question on the FAQ: by Compact+Dick · · Score: 0

    Q: Does straight anal sex cause pregnancy?

    A: Yes, straight anal sex is known to cause pregnancy for the female participant(s).

    --

    That explains how I knocked up your mother then.

    1. Re:The next question on the FAQ: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daddy!

  48. Potentially cruel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My gut feeling indicates that a competition where you can use "any technique" to achieve a goal with animals (including genetic manipulation, etc) could easily turn into something sick and cruel.. or maybe I'm just being too concerned.

  49. 150 human years? by plumby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is something that's often puzzled me. Who decided how many 'human years' there are in one mouse year (or cat/dog year for that matter)?

    1. Re:150 human years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just comparing averages i guess. so lets say average human life expectancy is 100 years (lets say) and mice have 1 year (again, lets say). then a 1 year old mouse would be 100 years old in human years.

    2. Re:150 human years? by Kjella · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Take average human lifespan and divide by average cat/dog/mouse lifespan. That is the factor, nothing more, nothing less. Ok maybe somebody made that guesstimate into an "official" factor, but I couldn't really care who did that.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:150 human years? by fred+ugly · · Score: 1

      >>> then a 1 year old mouse would be 100 years old in human years.

      shouldn't that be, a 1 year old mouse would be 100 years old in mouse years? people always seem to get that backwards. if you take the correct ratio, then since a mouse's life expectancy is 1/100th that of a human, then there should be 100 mouse years in one human year. not the other way around.

    4. Re:150 human years? by plumby · · Score: 1

      But at what point? The average human life is getting longer, and I'd guess that average dog/cat/mouse lives aren't keeping pace (not as much money spent on keeping elderly mice alive normally), so is the 'mouse year' getting longer? And are they shorter in third world countries where people tend to die younger?

  50. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by RogerWilco · · Score: 2, Informative

    having something orbiting the sun at near light speed will squish
    mouse A as the angular velocity will induce a centrifugal force
    high enough to.
    Maybe if you'd send it to some distant galaxy at near light speed, and then back again? You'll also have to keep de acceleration limited, like 2G otherwise your mouse will also get squished.
    Oh, and don't mind the near infinite energy needed to approach even 0.9 c.

    --
    RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  51. C64... by userloser · · Score: 0

    I've got one of those C64 mice that's pretty old, bit squeaky and slow to respond but generally still 'alive'.

    Can I enter it in the competition?

  52. Just What We Need by Goo.cc · · Score: 1

    "The Methuselah Mouse contest was created in an effort to boost research into human longevity"

    Yeah, that's what we need, longer living humans who already overpopulate the Earth due to a lack of natural preditors. If you ask me, what we really need is a good plague. (Captain Trips, anyone?)

    1. Re:Just What We Need by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe we could make leaving the planet a requirement for treatment. Anyone for a Mars colony?

    2. Re:Just What We Need by more · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that's what we need, longer living humans who already overpopulate the Earth due to a lack of natural preditors.

      Remember that an increase in longevity produces a significant drop in the density of teenagers.

      --

      -- Imperial units must die --

    3. Re:Just What We Need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess since you feel that way you are an ideal candidate to do your part and join The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement.

  53. Disney wins!! by MarsBar · · Score: 1, Funny

    Mickey's been around for 75 years.

  54. But of course... by taliver · · Score: 1, Redundant

    "The Methuselah Mouse contest was created in an effort to boost research into human longevity."

    Wow! What a concept! Surely there would be no other reason for scientists to look to extend life than a per-day monetary prize! And of course, no scientist would get recognition otherwise! Ponce de Leon may have looked a lot harder if he was just trying to find an old mouse...

    Give me a break.

    How about having a contest for reasonable solutions to a problem of overpopulation, or, more importantly, a contest to see if there is a politician with enough backbone to raise the retirement age to 100.

    (In all seriousness, I'm of the opinion that the retirement age should be set to a value dependant upon the expected lifetime in the society, as well as some level of job availability. Now this formula would be a good thing to reward.)

    --

    I demand a million helicopters and a DOLLAR!

  55. Mouse Howard Foundation? by island_earth · · Score: 3, Funny

    The hidden party behind the experiment was clearly a wealthy mouse who found himself dying young, and started this contest as a way to extend mouse lives. Now, members of the experiment just need a way to get in touch with each other...

    "Ears are short."

    "But tails are long..."

    "Not 'while the evil D-Con comes not'"

    1. Re:Mouse Howard Foundation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best in-joke chuckle I've had for a while :D

  56. The key to long living mice... by MrFreshly · · Score: 0

    clean their balls.

  57. Simpsons moment by nfk · · Score: 0

    (Different townspeople try to figure out how to get Timmy O'Toole out of the well)
    Falcon Man: Grasping the child firmly in his talons, Socrates here will fly him to safety. Just watch. (falcon flies away) I don't think he's coming back.
    Fisherman: With this hook, and this hunk of chocolate, I'll land your boy. And I'll clean him for free.
    Professor Frink: Although we can't reach the boy, we can freeze him with liquid nitrogen so that future generations can rescue him.

  58. Do Rats Count? by c1ay · · Score: 1, Funny

    If so, I call dibs on Darl McBride...

    --

    1. Re:Do Rats Count? by o'reor · · Score: 0

      Well, this particular rat may not have as long a lifespan as expected... Besides, ending up in a penguin's stomach is probably not a pleasant experience.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:Do Rats Count? by Unregistered · · Score: 1

      That's not nice to rats. And anyway, he's a little big to be a rat. Isn't he a ROUS?

  59. I upgraded to an optical mouse... by hughk · · Score: 1
    and it died on me.

    Well if has two eyes, then I call it an "optical mouse".

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  60. No! I Win! by El_Ge_Ex · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Found it!

    -B

  61. Is that 150 years or 150 mouse years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always hated putting things in to X dogs years. Its confusing as heck. Now mouse years?
    What's wrong with plain, average, everyday old years, i.e. clock time?

  62. All it will take... by iCharles · · Score: 1

    ...is one determined kitten to throw another team off-track!

  63. What defines a mouse? by noims · · Score: 1

    I (obviously) know nothing about this, but do you define a mouse as something that emerged from a mouse's womb? Surely by applying this recursively you could slowly genetically alter a mouse into, say, a tortoise that lives 100+ years... in theory, at least.

    Noims the ignorant

    --
    This is not the greatest sig in the world. This is just a tribute.
  64. Rats! by Infernon · · Score: 1

    I've also heard that rats have a life span of around two to three years. When I heard that they were affectionate as well as intelligent, I wanted one as a pet, but their short life span deterred me as it would kinda suck to get attached to an animal and not have that much time with it. That, and the fact that the cat keeps laughing at me every time that I bring it up...

    1. Re:Rats! by more · · Score: 1

      Many (if not most) scientists, who work with rats for several years, get allergic to rodents. Do not get casual with them if you have any dreams of working in a mice-lab later on in your life.

      --

      -- Imperial units must die --

  65. Mouse Life by glh · · Score: 1

    The article is slashdotted, so forgive me if this is mentioned... Do they define what "life" is for a mouse? I mean, you could probably keep all of its systems going, but it might be in a comatose state for example. Ie, maybe the drugs they pumped into it completley frag it's brain functions. I think the mouse should have a decent quality of life in addition to having a long one. :) What good would having a long life be if you were immobilized, could only eat chease and crap your cage for the rest of your days? (OK, thinking about it, this might not be so bad...)

    1. Re:Mouse Life by da55id · · Score: 1

      The winning mice must be healthy and vibrant - as specified on standardized scientific tests. That's one of the reasons to use this particular species of mouse. You can score their relative health, vigor and even intelligence relative to young mice. aMAZEing eh? Dave Gobel - Chairman The Methuselah Foundation

  66. This is the kind of by jcsehak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what's the worse things that's going to happen?

    The worst thing is that you shouldn't be fucking around with life unless you're very serious about doing it for the express purpose of helping other, better (arguably), kinds of life. I can't stand PETA as much as the next guy, but shooting a mouse full of cells just to see what happens is irresponsible, and downright mean.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:This is the kind of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously your parents should have followed your advice. I'm sure your Dad was thinking about the future good will of humanity when he popped one off in the ol lady.
      Don't fuck with life. That's good advice, you ought to take it.

    2. Re:This is the kind of by Tactical+Skyrider · · Score: 0

      I dont think cruelty to animals is a noble practice, in itself.. or that we should just experiment on the masses without their knowledge..

      but how can you compare the existances of a few hundred mice to the betterment of life for all mankind? And why not give people with terminal diseases at least the option to try experimental therapies? If i'm gonna die, i think i'd want to at least be offered the opportunity to try out something new that might just be the next great medical breakthrough.

      On a related note, I have a friend who was in a car accident and had his back broken. He's paralyzed from the waist down. He was only 16 when it happened back in 2000. I really wonder how many stem cell protestors could face my friend and say "I'm protesting the research that may give you back your legs."

      --
      In Soviet Redmond, software programs you!
    3. Re:This is the kind of by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You're right, we should use baby seals & spotted owls instead.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    4. Re:This is the kind of by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I believe the general compliant about stem cell research isn't the research or its implications, but rather where the cells come from. The main group opposed to stem-cell research is the pro-live movement, on the basis that an embryonic human is entitled to all the rights of a child, and should not be killed to harvest its cells.

      This being the case, these protesters would probably say they are sorry about your friend's leg, but the stem cells in question already belong to somebody else. To them, you are asking for doctors to sacrifice lives to cure paralysis.

      The real debate isn't over stem-cell research - it is over when human life starts. I doubt you'd advocate killing 3-year-olds and harvesting their tissues to save your friend. The issue is where the line gets drawn. Some feel the line is drawn at childbirth, and others feel the line should be drawn at conception.

      My intention is not to start yet-another debate on when human life starts. However, I did want to point out that, regardless of whether they are right or not, the position of the pro-life movement on stem-cell research is consistent with their position on abortion.

      I'm sure that if another source of stem cells could be identified then the debate would go away - most Americans are not opposed to researching cures to diseases, but there is a great deal of controversy over abortion.

    5. Re:This is the kind of by jcsehak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what I'm saying -- fucking around with lab mice is a Good Thing, because it lets us better all mankind. But we need to keep in mind that at the end of the day, we're still (sometimes, at least) killing things, and it should be done with reverence and maybe a little regret. Making messing-around-with-rodent-lives a contest with prize money seems a little in bad taste, to me.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    6. Re:This is the kind of by da55id · · Score: 1

      We are looking to incent the extension of the healthy and vigorous lifespan of mice. We are sensitive to the issue of animal treatment. We have great reverence for life - that is a key motivation for the prize series. dave

  67. This is a hard problem by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to this article, scientists are going to have a hard time getting their mice to live longer. Because cancer tends to "take over" as an animal's age increases, scientists have tried using cancer-preventing proteins to prevent this. The problem they found, however, was that it accelerated the aging process for mice. That's not to say that some other method may find a way around this, but scientists do still seem to be grappling with the issue.

    Besides, didn't anyone read Brave New World Revisited? Overpopulation is not the answer. :^)

    1. Re:This is a hard problem by pavon · · Score: 1

      I have a question. I know that cancer is caused my a mistake when duplicating DNA strands. (some mistakes caught and corrected, others effectless, others fatal, and a tiny percentage cancerous) I was of the impression that most of these mistakes were due to cosmic rays. Is this the case? How much life could one add by keeping the mouse in a radiation sheilded lead box and carfully monitoring the food it eats?

      Oh, and I for one welcome our new somec-sleeping mouse overlords.

    2. Re:This is a hard problem by dharmawan · · Score: 1

      the atmosphere blocks most of the ionizing cosmic rays before they reach us. there are many causes for DNA mutations- infections, radon, oxidative damage from our own metabolism etc
      over time, the chance of some of these mutations hitting an area of DNA which controls cell death/replication increases, and thus the chances of getting cancer

  68. Too late! by Dizzo · · Score: 1

    They're already starting to take over:
    http://www.interfax.ru/e/B/0/28.html?menu=1&id_iss ue=5659510

  69. World peace, and environmental responsibility by mericet · · Score: 1

    When you are immortal - the stakes are just too high to take a gamble on the rest of your life.

  70. Golden Rice. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The third world needs patents on its food supply like a moose needs a hatrack.

    Are there conceivable benefits? Sure. Is it worth having a single multinational owning---in what sense, exactly, is the rice grown owned by Monsanto? I'm not exactly clear on this---the food stock of an impoverished nation, capable of threatening famine to beat another few bucks out of the country.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Golden Rice. by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So is your complaint about GM food, or intellectual property law?

      In theory some foundation could come up with a GM food product which is free of IP baggage. Such a food could be freely grown by anyone. Since we aren't talking about experiments on humans the costs of research are much lower than in, say, drug design.

      Usually the IP issues are a red herring - most GM protesters oppose GM food, and they're looking for any argument they can get. I don't think that the IP issues are at the heart of the matter for most people.

  71. I thought low cal diet increased life by 3 times? by clusterix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My pet mouse lived for 2.5 years (before getting the deadly neurological/arthritis problem most mice get at that age) and I have seen others live that long easily. I thought mice were the animals that were tested with the low cal diet that made them live 3 times longer. I remember the news film having mice.

    Shouldn't it be at least 7 years if mice were in that test? Something is strange here.

  72. Mousey the 853rd? by Atheraal · · Score: 1

    Pardon my asking, but couldn't you just keep cloning your mouse every couple years? It would then have the same DNA as the original mouse and would therefore be indistinguishable by the contest enforcers.

  73. And the winning team is... by titzandkunt · · Score: 1


    [FX: drum roll, nervous coughing as the MC rips the envelope]

    Mr Paul Edgecombe, Mr John coffey, M. Edouard Delacroix and Mr Jingles!

    T&K.

    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  74. Not good... by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1

    "Squeak Squeak Squeak." Translation: "You will be assimilated. Resistance is futile."

    --

    Eat at Joe's.

  75. Contests can have unintended effects. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    For example, this could spawn the development of cryogenic storage. (Don't try this... it'd be cruel to the mouse.)

    Yeah, it's alive, and it's 50 years old. It just breathes very, very slowly.

    However, for my dollar, I think I prefer quality of life to quantity, which is why I take my Christianity seriously.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  76. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by pe1rxq · · Score: 1

    That would work, but you would en up scrapping your mouse from the centrifuge walls.....

    Jeroen

    --
    Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
  77. The mice in my apartment win.... by telstar · · Score: 0

    We keep killing them...
    They keep coming back...

  78. I've got a mouse that's 10 years old. by JRHelgeson · · Score: 0, Redundant
    I've been using this old serial bus PS/2 mouse for well over 10 years. It's connected to my 486dx2 66. All I need to do is clean out the ball every so often.

    Oh wait, nevermind. They want lab mice. My basement is nowhere near lab conditions.. Oh well.

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
  79. Are mice a good subject? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mice have very short life spans. They die of old age within a few years. So I question how much can be learned about increasing human longevity by trying to create a Methuselah mouse. Bats, on the other hand, are about the same size as mice and naturally live for three decades or more. It would be more useful to know why a bat can live to age 30 "out of the box" than how we can manufacture a mouse that lives to the ripe old age of 6.

    1. Re:Are mice a good subject? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apologies if it seems rude, but the phrase "out of the box" to describe a baby seems absolutely hilarious to me.

    2. Re:Are mice a good subject? by Have+Blue · · Score: 1

      One obvious advantage I can think of is that you only have to wait 6 years to see if you got it right, not 30.

    3. Re:Are mice a good subject? by evilWurst · · Score: 1

      The short lifespan of the mouse is exactly the reason why we try things on them first. We get useful results in a useful time span! Getting mice to live to 6 years might take a decade (but at least 6 years), but getting bats to live to 35 could take a century (or at least 35 years).

      Not surprisingly, the people seeking immortality today want it soon enough to be able to use it on themselves :) Spending decades watching to see if a bat has died yet won't help those the bat outlives.

    4. Re:Are mice a good subject? by da55id · · Score: 1

      Good point, and we're aware of this. We are perfectly happy with the idea that the bat genes would be compared with the mouse genes to identify which genes "make the difference", and if the bat genes could make the mouse live longer. No problem (unless of course the mice get loose and take over the world because they live too long now :-)

  80. Oh, please. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Except that the novelty would wear out.

    Tell you what. After I've stood on an airless planetoid in the Lesser Magellanic Cloud, and watched the Milky Way rise over its horizon, then you can ask me if I've seen everything worth seeing.

    The root behind all this would be that since you've lived for centuries/millenia, your understanding of human behaviour would be sufficiently mature to dull the curiousity related to the fruits of human creativity.

    So, a citizen of the Roman Empire circa 0 A.D. wouldn't be a bit surprised at the world of 2003? In any sphere; not just science, but art, politics, culture, etc.?

    Just because you can't imagine that genuinely new things will come up...

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Oh, please. by Kombat · · Score: 1

      So, a citizen of the Roman Empire circa 0 A.D. wouldn't be a bit surprised at the world of 2003? In any sphere; not just science, but art, politics, culture, etc.?

      I'm sure he would be, if you just instantaneously picked him up and plopped him down somewhere in the here and now. But if he'd lived through 2003 years of very slow advancement of civilization (handicapped a great deal by the Church and its Inquisitions), he'd probably just be a lonely (you'd stop wasting time on friends and wives after the 5th or 6th set of them died) old guy wandering around, muttering "Please kill me" in ancient Greek.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    2. Re:Oh, please. by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 1

      you'd stop wasting time on friends and wives after the 5th or 6th set of them died

      How so? I didn't give up on girls after I split up with my 5th or 6th girlfriend.

    3. Re:Oh, please. by Kombat · · Score: 1


      Did you live with each of those girlfriends for 40 years, spawn several children with each, then go through a 3-month long bout of depression after each one died of old age while you remained relatively spry?

      I think you underestimate just how long 2000 years is. That's a lot of lifetimes to live through.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    4. Re:Oh, please. by fenix+down · · Score: 1

      Which is why we do it this way, what with the radioactive mice and all, instead of just selling our souls to Satan. We get to bring the other cool people along this way.

    5. Re:Oh, please. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1
      you'd stop wasting time on friends and wives after the 5th or 6th set of them died

      Why would they have to die, too? Why would a hypothetical imortality treatment only apply to one person? Oh, sure, if it's based on some magic fountain deep in the Florida swamps there might not be enough water to go around, but something based on science is, by definition, reproducible...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    6. Re:Oh, please. by gilmour14 · · Score: 1

      what about pets? do you not get emotionally attached to your pet dog when you're 5 years old, then it dies. Then you get another one when your 12, that one eventually dies. Why don't people stop getting new pets after the old ones die? I think relationships with people would be the same thing, but on a larger scale.

    7. Re:Oh, please. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why don't people stop getting new pets after the old ones die? I think relationships with people would be the same thing, but on a larger scale."

      Wull, that'd be the reason that most Slashdotters don't have girlfriends.

      Relationships the same thing as pets, 'but on a larger scale'?

      Give me a fucking break.

  81. Old Mouse by ShpellCzech · · Score: 1

    I'd say the mouse next to my Next cube workstation here in the lab would be right up there...

  82. From the evolution point of view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That require more resource to maintain the same level of evolution of human. Do you really want that?

  83. Motivation? by lurwas · · Score: 0

    "The Methuselah Mouse contest was created in an effort to boost research into human longevity."

    Wouldn't the prospect of living longer yourself be motivation enough?

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Rich Immortals by JuiceBySarah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tha chance of you or I becoming immortal superhumans with the help of this mouse-tested science seems less likely than just a handful of rich guys becoming immortal superhumans. The bumper sticker "Cure AIDS: Infect the Rich" makes me laugh. Then it makes me think, then it makes me frown a bit.

    1. Re:Rich Immortals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If simple immortality treatments become available, expect all copyright/patent protections around it to collapse instantly. In socialists countries, citizens would already be entitled to it no matter what the cost. In others, citizens will demand it for all (for withholding it is to sentence them all to death). In nations that continued to deny it, there would be revolutions.

    2. Re:Rich Immortals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>Cure AIDS: Infect the Rich

      The rich are usually educated. And educated folks know well enough that you don't go slumming for sex. One stays away from making phsyical contact with the poor uneducated masses.

      You stand a better chance if not getting sick if you stay away from them.

      wbs.

  86. Heinlein would be proud by TilJ · · Score: 1

    Of course, once the long-lived mice are widely known they'll have to hijack a space ship and head for the stars to escape our envious wrath.

    --
    "The purpose of argument is to change the nature of truth." -- Bene Gesserit Precept
  87. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by boinger · · Score: 1

    Have you ever read any "distilled" summaries of the theory of relativity?

    The classic example is the spaceman who is rocketed out somewhere far away (many lightyears) at barely < speed-o-light. When he gets to his destination and "calls home" he'll find all of his immediate family and friends to be dead and his children to be old folks.

    (In the "happier" version, it's something like the spaceman is a twin, and his twin is an old man and he is not. Something like that. The Happy Guy wasn't going as far, I guess.)

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  88. OT: Movie Quote, "The Man Who Would Be King" by MCZapf · · Score: 1

    My favorite quote from that movie is when Sean Connery is training the natives in the military art, and he tells them something to the effect of, "now you can slaughter your enemies like civilized men!"

  89. Mickey is PD. Bite me, Mr. Eisner. by yerricde · · Score: 1

    While the copyright on "steam boat willy" will at some point lapse

    It has already.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  90. otnemeM by yerricde · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Have I told you about my condition?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  91. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Mr spaceman isn't any older. He hasn't had a longer life. It's just time has passed in a different way for him.

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  92. Obligitory Alpha Centauri Quote by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    I plan to live forever, of course, but barring that I'd settle for a couple thousand years. Even five hundred would be pretty nice.

    CEO Nwabudike Morgan :P

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  93. well, by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our elderly mice overlords!

  94. world domination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're close, sorry i think i'll have to kill you now.

    reference to Pinky and the Brain

  95. You cheater... by twoslice · · Score: 0
    cleaning the ball every now and again..

    Only one ball??? Everyone knows that when you cut off the balls you extend the life...ask a Unic

    --

    From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
    1. Re:You cheater... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why make us ask? just tell us, jackass!

  96. oh mr jingles... by erwinkarim · · Score: 0

    where r u mr jingles.....

  97. Well ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your mice are belong to us.

  98. It's analogous to a TTL field in a packet. by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If a packet gets routed too many times, it's probably a loop. The TTL field gets decremented on each hop and the packet dies when it reaches 0.

    If a cell divides too many times, it's probably cancerous (if it's not a reproductive cell), the telemores get shortened on each division, and the cell goes senescent when they're gone.

    This is the mechanism behind the "Hayflick Limit" (q.v.). Last I read, nobody including Dr. Hayflick was sure how much this phenomenon had to do with real-life aging.

  99. Playing God with mice and men. by fishnuts · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most people would call me an atheist, because I don't believe in a supreme entity whom has complete power over us and our world, but I just realized something.
    We are God.
    We've already stopped our own evolution. Before we developed the ability to heal ourselves, kill off or obsolete our only natural predators and shield ourselves from any natural threat, we were HAPPY to live to a ripe age of 30-40 years. It was plenty of time to raise a family and pass on our general knowledge of our simple little world.

    200 years ago, we didn't know what cancer was. Not because we had no way to SEE it or diagnose it, but because it simply didn't happen (short of the very low rates of actual cancer manifestations.) When someone got sick from a terminal disease, it was just accepted as a fact of life, and those people became a statistic of Darwin's laws.

    Now, people with congenital diseases (or diseases inherited from parents, or combinations of parents' genes which give the child a high predisposition for a disease) are surviving longer AND reproducing, causing such diseases and predispositions to prosper. On the other side of the same coin, we're weakening our species' immunities to congestive diseases by artificially suppressing and preventing them with medicine.

    Biomedical engineering is also causing as much harm as good. Sure, we've eliminated many Really Bad Diseases. But now there are mutated versions of the same diseases (viral and bacterial) that survived our initial campaigns to eliminate them, which have proven to be much more resistant to our medicines and techniques. Virii and bacteria are still evolving, and there's nothing WE can do to stop that. It's only going to get worse.

    Don't get me wrong here. I'm happy and extremely grateful to live a longer, healthier, and safer life than my predecessors. But we're taking this whole "Live Longer!" thing to an extreme that will only be detrimental in the long run. In fact, overpopulation is one of the immediately obvious effects of this. Why are we spending billions and billions of dollars and as many man hours every year, intentionally extending the lifespan of our individuals, instead of the collective species?

    God (the one that most people in the world pray to) NEVER intended us to live this long. If God exists, I believe cancer, AIDS, SARS, and Osama bin Laden (sorry, couldn't resist :) are simply His latest attempts to curb the population problem that we've initiated.

    Creating 'super mice' might be a great novelty at first, and a boon to science, but what we learn from them certainly wont benefit our species. Just ourselves. Seems a bit selfish, ignoring the decline in quality of life many generations in the future will be faced with.

    (Yes, I'm playing the devil's advocate here, but it's a point I REALLY wish more people would consider)

    1. Re:Playing God with mice and men. by multi+io · · Score: 2, Interesting
      God (the one that most people in the world pray to) NEVER intended us to live this long.

      If you look at the statistics more closely, you'll probably notice that improved hygienic conditions have increased the average life expectancy more than all medical advantages ever made combined. Life expectancy 200yrs ago was 45 or so, today it's 80, but the standard deviation was much higher then than it is now (that is, there were *many* more 90-year-olds 200yrs ago than there are 160-year-olds today).

      This means that "god" probably never intended us to die at 40, it's just that these days more people reach their "pre-defined" life expectancy instead of being wiped out by some minor unpleasantness long before their time has run out.

    2. Re:Playing God with mice and men. by register_ax · · Score: 3, Insightful
      We are God.

      Sorry, but I don't think you can tell people this. People progress through states of mind that allow more "intense" realizations to occur. A primitive tribe is extremely hesitant to outsiders because of the overwhelming amount of change they introduce. It takes an extremely open mind to allow such a transition. That needs to be broken down first, so, how?

      Questions. People need to be able to construct internal dialog or at least intelligent dialog between others. The important thing is being able to answer your own questions. This creates double the amount of work. Not only are you doubting "stuff", but you are trying to figure out that same "stuff" you're doubting.

      Hence, introduce only things you believe your intended audience is ready to hear. Posting on /. more than likely fulfills that, but keep in mind when discussing such things in the real life(tm). ;)

      Why are we spending billions and billions of dollars and as many man hours every year, intentionally extending the lifespan of our individuals, instead of the collective species?

      Creating 'super mice' might be a great novelty at first, and a boon to science, but what we learn from them certainly wont benefit our species. Just ourselves. Seems a bit selfish, ignoring the decline in quality of life many generations in the future will be faced with.

      These questions are extremely short-sighted. We extend lifespans indefinitely everyday; heart, liver, and kidney transplants, immunizations (preventive measure), vaccinations, CPR, blood transfusions, diabetic shots, or even those daily vitamins you take. All are either directly, or indirectly extending your life. It's easier to see the benefit of swapping organs when your's fails to operate properly, but all those other things are more of thinking in advance. You know of another life extension tip? Eat balanced diets and exercise. Holy shit! That may as well just save your life from tragic organ failures and cause you victim of brain disease. You see my point? If you are just going to die anyway why take the further preventive measure?

      By spending money on life extension, we are really understanding just more about the body. What is cancer? An abnormal cell. Why does that cell become abnormal? Well, what happens is we get a broader understanding of what is really going on. That is what I wish more people understood, knowledge is interconnected in ways we can't even imagine. If it were any other way, it would be just one person coming up with all the solutions to life.

      This is getting involved, but try and think of Leonardo da Vinci. This man is a pivotal subject in my theory. His quest was for knowledge. What may come of interest is he was just as wary of the whole "blood thing" as anyone else. He insisted that it is paramount to disregard this discomfort if you ever truly wanted to understand anatomy. For the obvious few who are aware of his works, one might want to pickup Leonardo: The Artist and the Man by Dover books. Note that Dover books are excellent books, but typically only to get you thinking about a subject, not so much a reference volume.

      Back on topic, and why do we extend these lives everyday. To improve the collective well-being of all involved with that person. Just think of the web of relationships that individuals are usually enroped (is that a word) to. Continuing that one life is adding value to easily a hundred lives. That value may even be small keeping in mind I am thinking of second-order persons as well. You can't limit the effect of one person's death on just those directly affected by it. It should be easy to see that the creation of "good" is a worthwhile cause. Keep in mind the int

    3. Re:Playing God with mice and men. by Ompaloskeptic · · Score: 1

      Humans have not stopped evolution. This is impossible. We've simply drastically altered the forces at work. and remember: Evolution works both ways. It's still evolution if humans gradully turn back into apes. That's why darwin didn't like the term evolution for his theory. Because people think that means it only creates "higher" forms from "lower."

      --
      Good health is merely the slowest possible rate at which one can die.
  100. I still hve the mouse from my Amiga 500 by Limburgher · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And that was 1986, so that's . . . 17? Right?

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:I still hve the mouse from my Amiga 500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my $poster="Limburgher";
      printf "%s lax printf sk1llz\n", $poster;

  101. Insert by 2names · · Score: 1

    Soilant Green reference [here].

    --
    "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
  102. Accept Christ as your saviour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you will have eternal life. Science is an eternal yoke of darkness.

  103. You're making this stuff up ... by cookie_cutter · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... or at least remembering it incorrectly.

    I know of no mouse which has been engineered with "re-activated" telomerase, tripling it's life span, nor did a google search find mention of one. I challenge you to provide a link or reference to such a mouse if it exists.

    Also, the limit of 50 cell replications you speak of is only for cells in culture, and it is still unknown whether there is such a limit exists for cells still in the body.

    Here is a telomerase faq

    1. Re:You're making this stuff up ... by Gyan · · Score: 1

      I don't have a cite, but check out Matt Ridley's Genome and in the index, follow up the entries for telomerase.

  104. Los Angelas???? by red+floyd · · Score: 1

    If they can't even spell "Los Angeles" correctly, then how will they count the LA vote correctly?

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  105. what I thought too by jcsehak · · Score: 1

    This is what I thought abortion was about too, but it turns out I was wrong. Abortion is legal not because the line is drawn at birth -- apparently everyone concerned agrees that the fetus is a living human being, but because it was decided that a woman can't be forced to incubate against her will.

    AFAIK, your description of the issues in stem cell research was spot-on though.

    --

    c-hack.com |
  106. Happy Fun Nitpick Time by Sabu+mark · · Score: 1

    So, a citizen of the Roman Empire circa 0 A.D. wouldn't be a bit surprised at the world of 2003? In any sphere; not just science, but art, politics, culture, etc.?

    There was no such year as AD 0. Jeez, you're as bad as the Itchy and Scratchy animators who had Itchy strike the same one of Scrathy's ribs twice in succession while producing two distinctly different tones.

    --

    What Would Jesus Do
    (for a Klondike bar)?
    1. Re:Happy Fun Nitpick Time by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      There was no such year as AD 0.

      Yes there is. AD 0 = 1 BC. AD -15 = 16 BC. 0 BC = AD 1. -15 BC = AD 16. Honestly, it is a trivial extension of the definition.

  107. Worse! by cookie_cutter · · Score: 1

    You spend a almost a billion dollars to bring a new drug to market, and it fails in phase three clinical trials, so the FDA doesn't allow you to sell it.

  108. Can I ... by gustgr · · Score: 0

    participate with my elvish lab mouse ?

  109. Re:Really an Award for Best Ear Transplant Techniq by Telastyn · · Score: 1

    No, the way to totally win the contest is to cryogenically freeze the mouse. Technically the thing will still be alive for years and years...

  110. Obvious problems by Omestes · · Score: 1

    There are too many of us now. If we lived a mear 30 years longer, the resource drain would cripple our children. We die when we do to avoid competition with our children.

    Also semi-immortality would stagnate the power structure, new ideas come from new (i.e. young) people, but when we have a generation that refuses to die or leave power our children will never have power. The young will be second class citizens.

    The stubornly old will also gather great amounts of wealth, forcing those who are young, or those who refuse to be immortal to be slaves/paupers/underclass.

    If I had a choice, I'd live to 2070 as an aware being, then die. I don't get what immortality would do that is good for SOCIETY. I'm sick of advancments in technology that are good for the individual.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  111. one of the organizers by da55id · · Score: 1

    Hi folks, As one of the organizers, here's an answer to the question about transplanting mouse ears to game the system. We are looking at providing custom engineered mus musculus mice that contain a special secret recipe that guarantees authenticity. FYI, around 70% of mus musculus die of Cancer...you might think of this competition as a "two-fer". To make a mouse that's two years old already survive for 4 or 5 years, you MUST prevent the cancer in the already aged rat. Re:Immortality - We're seeking to provide lots more healthy tomorrows - I hate leaving movies in the middle :-) ...and...I LOVE Pinky and the Brain! Dave Gobel

  112. From the lips of the world's oldest mouse... by The+Scooter+King · · Score: 1

    "(squeek) kill me (squeek) kill me...."

    --
    Everything's been downhill since the TRS-80
  113. Scientists, it turns out, are smart. by spumoni_fettuccini · · Score: 1

    And more power to them. I raised mice when I was 11-15 and this was a long time before a veterinarian did anything other than perform euthanasia on animals and they were _mice_. I'm not sure what the growth/cancers were or the specific cause, I did know it was a common problem with severely inbred rodents. The inbreeding did result in some interesting mice though, I had a strain of gold furred, red eyed for a while.

    --
    -- Some days you're the dog; some days you're the hydrant.
  114. No fscking way... by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 1

    Mickey Mouse wins all the fscking way... :P

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  115. Is this worn out already? by chadjg · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new rodent overlords, and would like to remind them that as a ....

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  116. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by boinger · · Score: 1

    Right, but the people who are judging the age of the subject (spaceman or mouse) have aged, as compared to the subject, at an accelerated rate.

    So, if the mouse subject was born in year 1 and the space flight took 2 years, but the judges aged 100 years, the judges would say "god DAMN that's one old mouse! I remember when he was born! He's 100 years old!"

    Of course, to the mouse, he's just middle-aged.

    --
    Send your friends messages of love at fuck-you.org
  117. Right on. by Kaki+Nix+Sain · · Score: 1
    Personally, I would make a pact with myself. If I ever felt like giving up the immortality and offing myself, I would give it another 500 years. If in that time I never found anything to make me think living longer was worth it, then I might give up.

    Immortality may give you a lot of time to get bored, but it would also give you a lot of time to develop patience in the search for cool things.

    --

    (C) Kaki Sain, 2011. By reading this, you have illegally copied my property to your brain.

  118. Re:Really an Award for Best Ear Transplant Techniq by Dyolf+Knip · · Score: 1

    Ahh, but you forfeit the winnings if you can't revive him.

    --
    Dyolf Knip
  119. Re:I know how to win, with no changes to the mouse by DChristensen · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no, no! This will result in a very young mouse! What you need to do is speed the universe up to the speed of light while leaving the mouse stationary.

    Voila! Old mouse!

    --

    --
    Mac OS X--Unix without the assholes^Whassles.

  120. Would you really want these guys around forever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.carrottop.com/

    Benifer? Bush (the whole family)? Clintons (both of them)?

    It's the wealthy like them that could afford longevity treatments.

    And they'll only get wealthier since their patents and copyrights could last forever. If you think creativity is stifled now, just wait till it's the same people creating stuff (what with the lower people turnover at longer longevities).

  121. Freeze many mice, thaw them in turn. by Dog135 · · Score: 1

    I thought of that too. They only want video for each day it's alive AFTER it beats the current record. So here's what you do:

    Take mouse #1, submit it, have it tagged, freeze it.
    One month later, do the same with mouse #2
    And so on.

    1 week before beating the current record, thaw mouse #1 and let it live the rest of it's life out, videotaping it each day.

    Once mouse #1 dies, thaw out mouse #2. Since mouse #2 is a month younger then mouse #1, it hasn't beat the record yet.

    rinse, lather, repeat.

    Eventually, you'll have 10+ year old mice with just a touch of frostbit on it's toes.

    --
    "That's so plausible, I can't believe it!" - Leela
  122. Wowbagger The Infinitely Prolonged by damiena · · Score: 1

    I know, you could spend your eternally lasting life travelling around the Universe insulting people! Just to make it more interesting, why not give it a go in alphabetic order! That's what I would do.

  123. Mouse contest by xmda · · Score: 1

    When I first read the title I expected to see an article about scientists finding signs that as early as 3000 years ago, people was holding "mouse contests", i.e. let two mouses into a little arena and let them to some crazy buddha kick-boxing.

  124. wrongheaded by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's nice and all, but the world would be a much better place if science concentrated on finding ways to reduce the world population rather than increasing it. Our planetary resources, natural, human, economic, and otherwise, are limited, and the more people that share this world, the harder it will be to reduce suffering and improve our lot.

    What's more, it seems to me that if we're going to work on extending life expectancy, we should focus on populations which have significantly shorter life expectancies than our own: developing nations, inner city minorities, rural poor, people who do very dangerous jobs, etc. We already have all the science and technology we need to solve many of the problems these people face; what's needed now is better policy.

    Beyond that, we should think about improving quality of life, rather than quantity of life, for everyone. Here again, we already have plenty of science to help, and we need to instead focus on reforms in the health care and pharmaceutical industries that will reduce suffering and increase happiness.

    There may be some merit to building a Methusala Mouse. It may give us insight into the aging process which will help us help people to live better. Helping people to live longer just because we haven't yet come to terms with death seems like a waste of time.

  125. Microsoft InPort Bus mouse by rfmobile · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is that old enough? I think I've still got one sitting in a very used 286-12 or 386SX-16. -rick

  126. Calorie Restriction by DietHacker · · Score: 1

    If not already mentioned, calorie restriction aka CR is the best route for long-lived mice. Visit The CR Society where they are all about calorie restriction all the time.

  127. Everyone knows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone knows they mice are just waiting until we get a permanent manned base on the moon. THAT'S when the enslavement / mining will really start.

  128. Only Five Years? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had a pet wild mouse that lasted seven.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  129. IP Issues. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    Red herring? GM food is terribly expensive to develop. No one's going to release it out of the goodness of their hearts. Ergo, IP issues are inextricably tied to the use of GM food, as the multinational corps that created them have to make a profit on all their hard work.

    My complaint, of course, is about IP laws and what looks to be a scummy gambit by Monsanto to make a large portion of the Third World entirely dependent on them, if not for the air they breathe, then at least for the staple foods they eat.

    GM foods in general are another issue, one which I'm in no way qualified to discuss.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  130. Douglas Adams had it right by MichaelDelving · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The puppet strings are showing. The mice are behind everything after all.

    1. Re:Douglas Adams had it right by MichaelDelving · · Score: 1

      And I, for one, welcome our mouse overlords.

  131. Incredibly OT, but... by forkboy · · Score: 1

    Your post reminds me of a drunken redneck game that friends of mine used to play. They'd buy various small caged pets (mice, rats, tarantulas, scorpions) and make them fight each other, taking bets on which one would win each bout.

    It later became known as Animal Kingdom Kumite, after a series of strips from the late, great Space Moose comic.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  132. Here's my entry by Caractacus+Potts · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I've got a pretty old mouse to enter in this contest. It's a MS Mouse, serial number 0002224, circa 1983. Five years old ain't nothing! Any challengers?