Slashdot Mirror


Apple Pulls 10.2.8 Update

physicsnerd writes "Apple has apparently pulled the Mac OS X 10.2.8 update from Software Update. The standalone updates have also been pulled. There have been reports of problems with 10.2.8 on iMacs and eMacs." People have also reported network problems.

240 comments

  1. Works fine on my eMac... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    ... and if anyone post one of those no-carrier jokes, I'll... umm... let's see, I can't mod them down...

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    1. Re:Works fine on my eMac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      I for one welcome our new [NO CARRIER]

    2. Re:Works fine on my eMac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      In Soviet Russia, it carriers YOU!

    3. Re:Works fine on my eMac... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Shouldn't that be more like:

      In SOVIET RUSSIA, 10.2.8 [NO CARRIER]!

  2. Even with extensive beta testing... by suyashs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You would think that after a few months of beta testing this update they would have caught all the bugs.....

    --
    http://chrono.posterous.com/
    1. Re:Even with extensive beta testing... by suyashs · · Score: 2, Informative

      By "all the bugs" I mean most of the big bugs...cause there seem to be some major bugs surrounding this update....

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    2. Re:Even with extensive beta testing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      Good thing you all paid a lot of money for this quality operating system and the quality control that comes with it.

    3. Re:Even with extensive beta testing... by nate+nice · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, you would think so but the software process is a complicated one and mistakes do happen. It's appropiate if it is of rare occurance and can be fixed in a timely manner, this is of course for systems that are not designtated mission critical, such as consumer operating systems such as Mac OS X.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    4. Re:Even with extensive beta testing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Dear Apple: You've been haXOreD FuxOrS. Suckee it down! Woot!

  3. Odd... by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 2, Informative

    I finished the update earlier on my PowerBook G3 with no problems.

    *knock wood*

    Are we certain this is an [e|i]mac-specific issue?

    1. Re:Odd... by TMFUberman · · Score: 3, Informative

      I finished the update last night on my 15" FP iMac. No problems.

      However, the complaints on Apple's internal boards indicate issues with Ethernet connections. I use Airport, and it's fine.

    2. Re:Odd... by DJMeatBall · · Score: 3, Informative

      there are a number of bitchin' comments on Apple's Support discussion boards about wacky screen behavior on PowerBook G3's.

      Which I also have been hitting since updating my Lombard.

      Three or four reboots ago.

      blah.

    3. Re:Odd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      From what I've been hearing, it's an [e|i|e|i|o]mac issue.

    4. Re:Odd... by selderrr · · Score: 2, Funny

      I finished the update last night on my 15" FP iMac.


      Wow ! You have first post iMac ?? Holy bananas, I want one of these !



      (sorry, couldn't resist)

  4. new ssh fix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe they will re-release it with the new ssh fix!

    1. Re:new ssh fix? by csoto · · Score: 0

      Why? That flaw is in 3.7. Jaguar has 3.4. Plus, the flaw only affects PAM authentication, which is of by default.

      --
      There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
    2. Re:new ssh fix? by AFuckingCookie · · Score: 0

      1. the flaw has been in there since then
      2. you think just because it's not on by default, it shouldn't be fixed?

  5. Awww Crap.... by Whatchamacallit · · Score: 4, Informative

    I just installed the updates this morning on two computers. PowerMac Dual G4 1Ghz MDD and a PowerBook G4 550Mhz.

    No problems, encountered but I installed the updates and ran a Repair Permissions afterwards.

    The only problem:
    The PowerMac screen saver went to sleep and would not wake up after the Software Update mandatory reboot. I had walked away from the machine after telling it to reboot and did not even login to it. It froze with the screen blanked. I ended up SSHing into it from another computer and doing a sudo shutdown -h now then powered it back up. This is when I ran the Repair Permissions.

    The PowerBook was upgraded after this and it didn't have a single problem. I didn't have a chance to test it though.

    Hope they roll out an updated 10.2.8 soon so whatever major bug(s) were let loose; would get reined in quickly.

    Serves me right in not waiting 2 days before I applied the updates. Some were having problems but most were do to people running haxies.

  6. Thank heavens for the compulsives by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    1. Re:Thank heavens for the compulsives by MBCook · · Score: 1
      I remember seeing that, and I have to tell you that that comment would have stopped me from installing the update for a few days. I say "would have" because I don't own a Mac. But if I did, my guess is that I would have rushed to update since I've never had an update screw me over (that I can remember).

      Slashdot paranoia pays off! Who knew?

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  7. Well.... by solistus · · Score: 4, Informative

    As far as I know, the problem is limited to a few iMacs/eMacs. I have no problems on the iBook, powerbook g4, or powermac G4 in my house... all on 10.2.8. I would expect Apple to put it back up as soon as they fix the apparent failure, either through a modified 10.2.8 or a patch for the systems affected. This update is nothing all that exciting, so it's not a mistake that it ever went up. In other words, don't worry if you have 10.2.8. You'll be fine.

    1. Re:Well.... by babbage · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, this is not an iMac/eMac problem. Far from it. Most reports I've read so far seem to be focusing on dual G4s in the 500mhz range, possibly restricted to ones with Intel's gigabit ethernet chipset. However, some reports talk about Powerbooks as well, so the scope of the problem isn't quite yet clear. The main consolation seems to be that Airport & dialup connections do not seem to be affected, just standard, traditional wired ethernet. Broadly, this is a nasty bug for those unlucky enough to be affected -- consider yourself lucky that you're not seeing it on your machines.

    2. Re:Well.... by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      I ran into the problem on a Dual 500 MHz G4- networking stopped working. The old ethernet driver restoration fixed the problem, and nothing else seems to have been affected. I do not think the machine has gigabit, just 10/100.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    3. Re:Well.... by kinnell · · Score: 2, Funny
      This update is nothing all that exciting

      Of course it's exciting, it was posted on slashdot.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    4. Re:Well.... by adam872 · · Score: 1

      Fingers crossed, no issues on my iBook so far. I noticed a couple of apps launched a little faster (like terminal) but nothing major yet...

    5. Re:Well.... by CyberDave · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Dual 500 G4s have Gigabit Ethernet. As do the 400 Mhz and Dual 450 machines that were released at the same time, at MacWorld New York 2000. I know. I own one.

      Good thing I was too busy to get the 10.2.8 update when it first came out that I completely missed it. :)

      CyberDave

  8. My Update Worked Fine by UV_Haze · · Score: 0

    I don't know what it is but i'm just addicted to these Mac OS X updates. I hear one is comming down the pipe and I wait with baited breath.. Itching for it to hit Software Update. Anyway.. my update worked fine. 10.3 or bust Apple.. ;-)

    1. Re:My Update Worked Fine by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      "I hear one is comming down the pipe and I wait with baited breath."

      Eating worms again? Good protein source. But you'll find more of them on a Windows machine - you could starve trying to live off of Mac worms.

      Or did you mean "bated breath?"

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
  9. Seems to work for me by highcaffeine · · Score: 3, Informative

    With one weird, but possibly-not-related, exception.

    I did the 10.2.8 update on my G4 PowerMac. After the initial reboot and before I had a chance to actually do anything, my keyboard and mouse stopped responding. But a power cycle later and things seem to be working fine. I've since run a couple Classic apps (mainly the scanning software for a Canon), plus OS X Photoshop 7 and connected to a couple Samba shares on a Linux server. The only network connection is wired Ethernet.

    I should have thought to try and ssh in before cycling the machine, but I didn't. So, for all I know it could have either been just the kb/mouse, or it could have been the entire machine, that froze up.

  10. Software Update by pjteeter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Baited breath huh? I updated a 1GHz G4 Powerbook and a WallStreet Powerbook today. Everything looks ok for now...

    1. Re:Software Update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am having problems with my ghz pb. finder windows shutdown spontaneously (among other problems), safari crawls, it takes FOREVER to shut down and start up, and my computer has lost it "zippiness" in general. i do NOT like 10.2.8 at all.

  11. Ethernet problems... by singularity · · Score: 3, Informative

    Quicksilver G4/933 running 100Base-T through DHCP:

    I upgraded last night and then rebooted. Everything worked fine. Then this morning I suddenly lost all Internet access. Tried to renew the DHCP lease, and that failed. I rebooted and things are working (for now).

    Other problems: The Firewall pane of the System Preferences says I already have a firewall running and therefore it will not let me change/configure it.

    All in all, most OS X upgrades have been pretty problem-free for me. It sucks these things happen, and they should not happen, but...

    Something else funny - right before the machine went down I was complaining on IRC about the new SSH patch and how I was going to have to take down my machine again for that.

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  12. Glad they pulled it! by matt_j_99 · · Score: 3, Informative

    My 17 inch powerbook was rendered useless overnight. Upon rebooting, the video display renedered the grey screen of death. Hopefully, doing an 'archive and install' and going back to 10.2.6 will fix my woes... At least they are doing the responsible thing and pulling the plug on it.

    1. Re:Glad they pulled it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      My 17" Powerbook took it just fine... (he says whilst holding his breath). Seems there must be something pretty random going on.

    2. Re:Glad they pulled it! by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      Once the install was done, my screensaver had kicked in and somehow I was stuck with a black screen and no way to force quit it (even Ambrosia's "Escape Pod" utility didn't do the trick), so I had to do a force reboot.

      After that I ran fsck, removed the receipt for 10.2.8 and to be on the safe side installed it once again, this time with no problems.

      My 17 PowerBook is fine so far (knocks on wood).

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    3. Re:Glad they pulled it! by babbage · · Score: 1

      Not to be contrarian, but wouldn't the responsible thing have been to complete a full round of testing before unleashing this thing on the world...? ;-)

    4. Re:Glad they pulled it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right, tell that to us that lost entire hard drives from a fucking *iTunes* installer. Get your fucking act together, apple!

    5. Re:Glad they pulled it! by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      From what I've heard, several builds were seeded to select members of ADC. However, these seeds were released simultaneously with seeds of 10.3.

      I'm guessing that this release was originally supposed to be 10.2.7, but incompatibilities and build problems on non-G5 machines neccesitated a bipartitite release.

      I've had no problems on my iBook so far, but haven't tried ethernet. My Sonica even works.

    6. Re:Glad they pulled it! by NakedChick · · Score: -1

      I have one word for you, buck-o: coincidence. But what would I know? I'm just a naked chick.

      --
      --
      So I'm naked. So what?
    7. Re:Glad they pulled it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      From what I've heard, several builds were seeded to select members of ADC. However, these seeds were released simultaneously with seeds of 10.3.


      There is a much more extensive program than just seeding this to developers. Developers are mostly responsible for the leaks that hit the rumour pages, but Apple has a core group of hardcore users that it uses to seed pre-release software to.

      I was part of the 10.2.8 group, and we had no problems with it; the ethernet problems I've heard about only happen when you have a 10bT hub. There may be other issues. We're going to keep testing, there should be a new update soon.
    8. Re:Glad they pulled it! by MrMickS · · Score: 1

      I installed on my 17" PB with no problems at all. That said it was a completely fresh install so there was nothing odd for the update to deal with, no third party drivers and no chance of disk errors etc.

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    9. Re:Glad they pulled it! by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "My 17 inch powerbook was rendered useless overnight. Upon rebooting, the video display renedered the grey screen of death. Hopefully, doing an 'archive and install' and going back to 10.2.6 will fix my woes... At least they are doing the responsible thing and pulling the plug on it."

      If you look carefully at the linked board, one person solved it by booting from the diagnostic CD and doing the extended test. After that it *should* boot normally again.

    10. Re:Glad they pulled it! by matt_j_99 · · Score: 1

      *should* is the key word in this sentence. 10.2.6 wouldn't even install properly. It seems that the update merely exposed an existing hardware issue for me. I tried to run the Apple Hardware Test and had a memory read error befor the AHT even booted. Took out the RAM that came with the computer and it booted. But not before making some errors on the hard drive that don't go away when I repair the disk with Disk Utility from the install CD. Why it takes a software update to expose the hardware problem is beyond me....

  13. Wacom problems by tm2b · · Score: 4, Funny

    My only hand-input device is a Wacom Intuos 2 tablet & mouse. It seems that if you don't have a traditional USB mouse attached, Mac OS X 10.2.8 "helpfully" assumes that you must be trying to connect a bluetooth mouth and launches a Bluetooth configurator for you.

    Every.
    Time.
    I log in, and
    Every.
    Time.
    I log out.

    Man, this sucks. Not as bad as not booting, but it's a constant annoyance.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    1. Re:Wacom problems by Graff · · Score: 1

      Hmm, you probably could find out where that application is and remove it. It can't launch what's not there. When the thing runs control-click on it in the dock and select "Show in Finder", then drag it to the trash.

      You might get away with just moving it or renaming it also, depending on how Mac OS X locates it.

    2. Re:Wacom problems by toothfish · · Score: 1

      No problems here with my 4x5 Wacom Graphire-- 10.2.8, G4 Sawtooth 450 etc.

      No USB mouse action for me, either.

    3. Re:Wacom problems by tm2b · · Score: 1

      Do you have a Bluetooth transceiver? I'll bet that if you don't, Mac OS X doesn't try to configure it.

      If you do, then, well, damn. I'm puzzled.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    4. Re:Wacom problems by The_Grue · · Score: 3, Informative

      Turn it off. In the Bluetooth Preferences.

    5. Re:Wacom problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "assumes that you must be trying to connect a bluetooth mouth"

      Wow, that's some feature.

    6. Re:Wacom problems by toothfish · · Score: 1

      Uh, no. I sort of forgot to mention that in my first post. Although I guess it's possible that OSX could try to configure it anyway.

    7. Re:Wacom problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My 12" Powerbook G4 and intuos2 have had no problems at all since installing 10.2.8...I'm not sure why your's is having issues. Peculiar.

    8. Re:Wacom problems by tm2b · · Score: 1

      Your Powerbook already has an input device - the mousepad.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  14. luckily I'm on Airports everywhere by tomem · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I did notice some weirdness with my PowerBook G4 internet connection, which went away when I switched to a different location that is based on using my Airport(s).

    Also I noticed that my second monitor arrangement went away.

    I was thinking that these things must be complex and difficult to test every option. Still it sounds like they screwed up on this one. Ah well...

    --
    ThosEM
  15. Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I fear Apple's tried to hurry this update through to make a package of all the recent security fixes along with standard updates. Mistake! They should have released the security fixes asap and separately, and spent as long as required to test the rest.

    1. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then it would have to be 10.2.8.1 or 10.2.6.A or something similar and that just ruins the whole thing! Then again, you could have downloaded the new SSH code and compiled one for yourself, it's not a kernal moduale. With that, I suppose Apple could have released it as just a security update and been done with it so yes I agree you are right.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    2. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then it would have to be 10.2.8.1 or 10.2.6.A
      Not true. Apple has released several security patches in the past that didn't involve changing the version of the OS. And delving into patching apps yourself could lead to a conflict down the line when Apple introduces its own patches.

    3. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      What I was referring to was that 10.2.10 is the same as 10.2.1

      Downloadin and installing SSH will not effect any future OS upgrades. It's not a kernal leval patch, just a program patch.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    4. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly it. Sure, most Windows users moan and groan about updates, but that's because they usually end up like this one did for some Mac users! If I got hit with two updates, one a 'Security Update' that doesn't change the build, and then a week later or even next day, get 10.2.8 I would just install them and expect no problems.

      To take security more seriously Apple needs to get the Security Updates out there asap, and then take their time with system updates so that everything just works. That builds trust and keeps users running Software Update without worry.

    5. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by TheGreek · · Score: 1

      What I was referring to was that 10.2.10 is the same as 10.2.1

      Uh. No. It isn't. Unless you think that 10 and 1 are the same number.

      (Hint: They're not.)

      Apple's getting back to responsible software versioning, a refreshing change from what we've seen in the past few years.

    6. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Not in decimal. .1 is the same as .10, if you want a 10 then after .9 you get .2

      It's silly and I have seen software with 5.34.1, so yeah 10.2.10 would work, but this is all very silly.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    7. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by TheGreek · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that we have 10.2.6 establishes that we're not using decimal points the same way as in math.

      Decimal points in version numbers are more like *places* in numbers, except there's no defined base-n.

    8. Re:Apple please post security fixes then QA rest by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      God damn it, this is the silliest argument ever. ;P

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
  16. The QA people must have been having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    a gay orgy instead of testing this update.

    1. Re:The QA people must have been having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And you're bitter you weren't invited?

    2. Re:The QA people must have been having by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      very bitter god damn it. i heard steve jobs is as loose as the goatse.cx guy

  17. Battery Timer by cmason32 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The biggest "feature" of 10.2.8 for me was the battery timer was completely messed up. I removed the plug and the timer indicated there was 1:50 left, however, the battery actually lasted over 3 hours while multi-tasking AND charging my iPod. I let the battery run all the way down to let it recalibrate - and though the timer indicator is higher than it was last night, it is still not as high as before I installed the update. I have read that other people have had similar problems, too.

    It doesn't appear that the battery time itself was affected, just the way it calculates how much time is left.

    1. Re:Battery Timer by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Holy crap! I just uplugged on my 18 month old Powerbook G4, and notice I have 0:45m left!!! Recently I've noticed I'm only getting about 1:30m from this battery, but that's still a shock to see that 10.2.8 halved even that.

      Yikes. Thanks for the heads-up.

      -psy

    2. Re:Battery Timer by tonydiesel · · Score: 1

      Uh, I've had this problem well before 10.2.8. I never trust the battery timer, instead I go by the percentage remaining indicator (even that is a bit wonky).

    3. Re:Battery Timer by jaoswald · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The point is probably not that battery life is changed, but that the time remaining display is no longer accurate. The software doesn't release little gnomes to eat your battery or anything.

    4. Re:Battery Timer by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
      Extremely wanky for me (iBook 700 combo).

      % goes down to 90 or maybe lower, then the computer goes to sleep (takes 5 minutes or less). Plug it in and wake it, and it say 0% and slowly creeps us one percent at a time. Put it back to sleep and it will recharge in minutes.

      Drives me nuts that I have to have it plugged in all the time.

    5. Re:Battery Timer by rootofevil · · Score: 3, Funny

      well, technically it could have, if apple had included patented battery-eating-gnome technology. however, its rather unlikely.

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
    6. Re:Battery Timer by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

      I've never gotten an accurate battery timer. On my 2001 iBook, or my 15" AlBook, the timer always seems to show half of what I'm actually getting.

      I've never figured out why.

    7. Re:Battery Timer by Guido+del+Confuso · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem. Turns a circuit in the battery was malfunctioning. If your iBook is still under warranty you can call Apple and they'll replace your battery. If not, and you feel like spending the money, buying a new battery should solve your problem. Make sure you get it from a place with a good return policy, though, just in case it's not the battery.

      A good way to check is to push the button on the battery when the computer says it's full (all four lights should come on) and right after the computer falls asleep (only one light should flash).

    8. Re:Battery Timer by thunderbird46 · · Score: 1

      I have a 14-month-old 12" iBook and I too found my supposed remaining battery time down, at 2hrs 22 minutes upon unplugging on a battery that's done just over 5 hours unplugged. Time remaining climbed to almost 3 hours but now it's falling. In 10 minutes I've gone from 97% to 94% charge. At 3 minutes per percent the battery should have 300 minutes, or 5 hours, of capacity, so I'm not too worried (as long as this thing doesn't do like it did with 10.2.4 and suddenly fall asleep at 90% remaining, then charge from 0% to 10% then jump to 100%.)

    9. Re:Battery Timer by thunderbird46 · · Score: 2, Funny

      May I make the obligatory statement (even slightly on topic here!)

      1) Eat Batteries
      2) ???
      3) Profit!!!! :)

    10. Re:Battery Timer by rootofevil · · Score: 1

      aw cmon, this is at least a +1 funny...

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  18. PowerBook G3 "Lombard" problems... by kuwan · · Score: 1

    A lot of PowerBook G3 "Lombard" owners (myself included) have been having problems with frequent crashing that causes the display to become garbled. I first thought the problem was with Unsanity's Application Enhancer (APE), but after removing it I still keep crashing.

    Some have suggested repairing disk permissions via Disk Utility (which I'm in the process of doing) while others have suggested removing 1 of your 2 RAM modules (assuming you have two installed)

    I think that the problem has to do with having 2 RAM modules installed. I was monitoring my memory usage leading up to the crashes and whenever the RAM in use goes over 256 MB (meaning it's now using both RAM modules) then a crash will not be far away. The laptop was stable and never crashed if the RAM used was under 256 MB.

    So once my permissions repair is complete I'll probably remove one of my DIMMs to see if the problem really lies with the RAM.

    1. Re:PowerBook G3 "Lombard" problems... by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      I've read somwhere that this seems to be a problem with the motherboard that only shows up when using OS X on a Lombard with two RAM modules.

      I'm afraid this is a hardware issue and can't be easily resolved.

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
    2. Re:PowerBook G3 "Lombard" problems... by kuwan · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid this is a hardware issue and can't be easily resolved.

      This is most definitely NOT the case. I've used every version of Mac OS X, since pre-10.0 (DP 3) up to Panther, on my Lombard PowerBook and there has NEVER been an issue with having two RAM modules installed and I've had two RAM modules (384 MB) installed since I've owned the PowerBook.

      Also, you say that the problem "...only shows up when using OS X..." This, then, by definition is not a hardware problem, but a software one. If it was a hardware problem then it would show up on Mac OS 9, Linux, or any other operating system you installed.

      To get back to my original post, I did remove one of my DIMMs and have not experienced a crash since. So it is definitely a problem with memory access that they've introduced in 10.2.8. I'm going to try to install the 10.2.6 combo update to see if I can revert back to 10.2.6 that way (where the problem has never occurred). Otherwise I may have to reinstall 10.2 from CD and then update to 10.2.6.

      I'll report what I find in case anyone else is interested.

    3. Re:PowerBook G3 "Lombard" problems... by sakusha · · Score: 1

      APE is evil, I've had no end of obscure problems caused by those stupid gadgets. You don't want them on your system.

    4. Re:PowerBook G3 "Lombard" problems... by iCat · · Score: 1

      causes the display to become garbled.

      That's really interesting. In what way is the screen garbled? I've had infrequent (ocassionally frequent) crashes since moving to OS X, but always put it down to non-Apple memory modules (2x256MB). My display has also been acting up but I thought it was because my PowerBook was starting to show its age...

    5. Re:PowerBook G3 "Lombard" problems... by bursch-X · · Score: 1

      also, you say that the problem "...only shows up when using OS X..."

      Somehow reminds me of the issues many people had with RAM that wasn't up to spec with some Macs when OS X came out. For some reason the RAM wouldn't cause problems under OS 9, but OS X would become extremely unstable if you used RAM below spec.

      So now you're telling me that also was a software issue?

      --
      There are two rules for success:
      1. Never tell everything you know.
  19. how likely is a 10.2.10? by DJMeatBall · · Score: 3, Funny


    they haven't gone over a ??.??.9 release since... well.. I can't remember when. Can you?

    1. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by djward · · Score: 4, Funny

      That'll be 10.2.X version 10.0.

      Er... doing fine on 2 older G4 towers...

    2. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      yea, it almost looks like an IP address...

    3. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by babbage · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, and then we might find out what they intend to call the successor to X -- it's "oh ess ten", not "oh ess eks", so maybe we'll get a 10.2.XI "ten point two point eleven". It doesn't have to make sense, it doesn't even have to be consistent, it just has to be consistently inconsistent :-)

    4. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by nate+nice · · Score: 1

      Now that would be confusing, going from 10.2.60 back to 10.2.10. 10.2.6.1 would work though.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    5. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If Apple really wanted to confuse people, they could name it Mac OS 9:50.

    6. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Not very, unfortunately...Panther is supposed to be coming out pretty soon, and that leaves them quite a bit of time to stick with 10.2.8 (I guess it'll be 10.2.9, now). If there are any gaping security flaws, they'll probably release a security update, but I doubt they'll go over 10.2.9 this close to Panther's release.

    7. Re:how likely is a 10.2.10? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, then if people want security fixes they can just pay the $130 to upgrade to 10.3. Sounds like Apple to me.

  20. Mine too B&W G3 350 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My fathers B&W Tower (Smurf) has never needed to be sent in to Apple for repair or replacement of parts and every upgrade has always worked....I would say that it was the best investment he-s ever made.

  21. How about an explanation? by mountainhouse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One way that Apple could be different right now, would be to post some sort minimal explanation as to what's going on. I guess there's probably some sort of legal reason for not doing so.

    1. Re:How about an explanation? by physicsnerd · · Score: 4, Informative
      Apple gave MacCentral got a short answer: (from the article)

      "We have temporarily removed the Mac OS X v10.2.8 software update while we resolve an issue affecting Ethernet networking on small number of Power Mac G4 desktop systems. We anticipate that the issue will be resolved soon," said the statement in its entirety.

      The full article can be found here:
      http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/2003/09/23/102 8pulled/index.php?redirect=1064334986000

      Physicsnerd

  22. Damn upgrades. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Guess I'll stick with 10.3

  23. Sorry, but it's kinda appropriate by Unregistered · · Score: 3, Funny

    I installed it and it worked great. I sure didn't enounter any network prNO CARRIER.

    1. Re:Sorry, but it's kinda appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also, wouldn't want to encounter any network porno carriers.

  24. No problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Im running an old PMac G4 400 (AGP), I've not seen anything go wrong.

    Of course, my onboard network adapter and firewire ports were fried in a lightning storm...

    I hate kentucky.

  25. MS Office v.X problems... by snafu · · Score: 3, Informative
    According to MacWindows users, "...Now Excel and Power Point Crash after the splash screen..." (and more comments)

    This may imply something important is broken in the OS, or in the latest Office. In either case, it's important for Apple to keep it working.

    1. Re:MS Office v.X problems... by suyashs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Holy shit! My Excel works fine...but my Powerpoint just crashes! Could this be Apple trying to push keynote to the forefront by eliminating the competition? I am serious about Excel working and Powerpoint crashing though...

      --
      http://chrono.posterous.com/
    2. Re:MS Office v.X problems... by piscoBandito · · Score: 1

      I was having a few odd problems after I updated, so I downloaded and installed the combo updater before it got pulled. Everything seems to be working fine for me now, but the battery timer is still broken. I don't think battery life has been affected though, since the thing has read 42-38 mins left for the past 20 minutes.

    3. Re:MS Office v.X problems... by saitoh · · Score: 1

      Unless its something native to their machines, they are on crack, I just launched both and I'm fine.

      This sounds to me like Apple did a small mod to something in the underlying system and people who have haxies (which arnt supported) are now getting the brunt of the burn (like the guy above who noted about them). Not a garentee, but it is a though. I havnt modded my ibook at all cause I use it for work.

      --
      We don't need an "overrated" so much as we need a "you completely missed the parent's point, dumbass..."
    4. Re:MS Office v.X problems... by Graff · · Score: 1

      Hmm, no problems with anything in the Microsoft Office suite. Word, Excel, and Powerpoint work just fine so far. It must be some odd combination of factors that causes problems.

  26. no problems ibook/emac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no problems at all on iBook 900mhz / eMac 700mhz
    in fact, it seems to have cleared up a couple of issues i was having with the eMac.

  27. This update was a disaster for me by babbage · · Score: 5, Informative

    Like a lot of other people, this update seems to have completely screwed up ethernet networking for me. A lot of the reports I've read (Apple's site Slashdot comment, MacFixit article, MacSlash, etc) suggest that people with dual processor G4s running 400-500mhz are having a lot of problems, and a broken driver for the Intel gigabit ethernet chipset has been blamed -- though I haven't seen anything that conclusively says that this component is at fault. Other reports have come from people running faster G4s & PowerBooks, so if the Intel ethernet driver is a cause, it doesn't seem to be the only cause. All I can say personally is that my dual G4/450mhz is definitely messed up right now.

    The best remedy I've seen so far is to restore the pre-10.2.8 version of the AppleGMACEthernet ethernet driver. If you can -- and for most people it'll be too late for this advice to do any good -- make a backup of the .kext driver before updgrading to 10.2.8, then use that to rebuild is things go awry. For everyone else, your best bet is to download it from Andrew McPherson's MIT site, either by establishing a dialup connection, by booting into OS9 and getting it from there, or by grabbing it with another machine and transferring it to your broken Mac by e.g. a burned CD, a Zip disc, etc.

    Here are the repair steps, as slightly modified from McPherson's suggestion at Apple's site:

    mkdir ~/enet_backup
    cd ~/enet_backup
    wget http://web.mit.edu/apm/www/AppleGMACEthernet.tar.g z
    # note -- doing the above without network access is left
    # as an exercise for the reader. i happen to have a flash
    # card reader, so can transfer it that way, but I was
    # getting pretty desperate before that occurred to me.
    # others might want to try burning a CD, or getting
    # online from OS9, or a zip disc, or...
    # ...in any case, `wget` is about the only method that is
    # almost guaranteed NOT to work right now...

    cd /System/Library/Extensions
    sudo mv AppleGMACEthernet.kext ~/enet_backup
    sudo cp -r ~/enet_backup/AppleGMACEthernet.tar.gz .
    sudo tar -zxvf AppleGMACEthernet.tar.gz
    sudo chown -R root:wheel AppleGMACEthernet.kext
    cd ..
    sudo mv Extensions.kextcache ~/enet_backup/
    sudo mv Extensions.mkext ~/enet_backup/
    sudo shutdown -r now

    This advice is close to that which McPherson suggested, but he recommended deleting the broken driver, and the commands I give above make a backup just in case. If all goes well you may remove that ~/enet_backup directory, but I have a hunch that somehow you're going to have to end up re-installing it, so keeping a copy around seems prudent to me -- and it's not like it even takes up that much space (well under a megabyte).

    Other people have reported success with other solutions. One proposal was to run the command "ifconfig en0 media autoselect", but in my case that didn't work. Others have suggested rebooting, zapping the PRAM a few times, then letting the machine boot again; others have said that that didn't work either.

    Replacing the driver, as described above, seems to be the remedy that has had the most success for the most users -- but even still, it isn't working for everybody. In my case, it has allowed me to reconnect to my PPPoE/

    1. Re:This update was a disaster for me by lnoble · · Score: 1

      I'm running it on a dual 533 and have no problems at all. The housing network seems a little slower, but nothing too drastic. Guess the problems stop at 500 mhz.

    2. Re:This update was a disaster for me by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      No problems here on my dual 500... Other people are saying it only affects iMacs and eMacs. Maybe this guy with a broken dual 500 screwed it up himself.

  28. Totally offtopic Classic question - help? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    I recently was having problems that required me to reinstall OS X without saving users and network settings. I did this, and it all went fine, except now Classic will not run. It didn't work in 10.2 (which I installed from CD) and it didn't work after updating to 10.2.8; the preference pane tells me there is no usable classic system on the drive. Yet I can boot into OS9 and Startup Disk reports a working 9.2.2 system there. Is there some way to get my computer to recognize 9.2.2 and let me run classic mode when I need it?

  29. 10.2.8 kernel panics with MOTU drivers by klez23 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a MOTU 828 audio recording interface, and since i installed 10.2.8 this morning, i get a kernel panic every time i plug in the MOTU. Hope they get that one fixed in 10.2.(x|x>8)...

    1. Re:10.2.8 kernel panics with MOTU drivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same problem here with a MOTU 896. My dual 1ghz G4 won't boot up with the 896 powered on. When I turn it off, it boots properly, but the moment I turn it on it's an immediate kernel panic.

      Bad Apple. Bad.

    2. Re:10.2.8 kernel panics with MOTU drivers by mkldev · · Score: 1
      After you reboot, check in the file /Library/Logs/panic.log and paste a copy of the backtrace here on Slashdot, and I'll see if it's something obvious. No promises, of course.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    3. Re:10.2.8 kernel panics with MOTU drivers by StunodNiknud · · Score: 1

      I had the same problem. Just go to MOTU's web site and reinstall the 1.05 driver. It will fix the 828, 828mkII, and 896 interfaces.

      www.motu.com

      BTW, anyone notice the clock displaying military time with AM/PM at the end? Just had to turn them off and on again in preferences to fix, but that was an odd bug.

  30. Pulled? Wow. by gidds · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Have Apple ever pulled an update like this before? Any speculation on why this one fell below their usual high standards?

    I hit the Ethernet problem myself (and most frustrating it was, too), but replacing the driver (as described elsewhere) worked a treat, and I've had no other issues with 10.2.8 at all. No obvious benefits, either, though...

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

  31. No problems here by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Informative
    white 700mhz iBook, connected to the net with ethernet, no problems with connectivity or the system that I've seen so far. Also no problems on a dual 867 g4 mirrored doors which is connected via ethernet to DSL.

    I've used the ibook quite a bit since I updated it and everything seems fine so far. The battery indicator has the same problem someone else here mentioned of showing only half as much battery power as you would expect, but my battery has been flaky lately anyway due to another problem so I didn't attribute that to 10.2.8 until I read the comments about it. All in all, I'm having problems with these computers but I haven't noticed anything significant due to 10.2.8 yet. (keeping fingers crossed...)

  32. On a Pismo right now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, I'm on my AirPort connection, and I haven't tried my 10/100 Ethernet. I guess I'll wait for 10.2.8.1.

  33. Cost my wife a day of her time! by Olentangy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My wife went ahead and clicked the "OK, Update me" button this morning. All was well until near the end of the install when it froze.

    She finally gave up and pressed restart.

    BAD!

    The Finder now could not stay up. This was now an unusuable system.

    So we tried Disk First Aid. It found plenty of errors and said it was fixing them - each time it was run. But it wasn't really :-(

    So she spend most of the day constructing a new system on an external hard disk. Luckily little was lost, except her time.

    Not a happy experience.

    Apple needs to test these problem cases better. Please Apple, invest in more QA!

    1. Re:Cost my wife a day of her time! by mkldev · · Score: 3, Informative
      Hold down command-s at boot time. At the prompt:

      touch /testfile

      If this gives you an error that says that the filesystem is mounted read-only, then do:

      fsck_hfs /
      mount -uw /

      Now do:

      rm /testfile
      /usr/bin/update_prebinding -root / -force
      (wait a few minutes for a prompt)
      shutdown -r now

      And the applicaiton launch problems should be gone.

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
    2. Re:Cost my wife a day of her time! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Jaguar automatically fixes prebindings, and it's rare that doing so manually will fix problems with applications launching.

      Also, the filesystem is always mounted read-only when starting up in single user mode, so trying to touch a file to check if it's read-write is kind of pointless.

      And you can just exit from the single-user shell to boot your machine; shutdown-r isn't necessary.

    3. Re:Cost my wife a day of her time! by mkldev · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes, I couldn't remember if it was read-write or read-only, so I didn't want to say "fsck -f /", and I didn't want to reboot my machine mid-message to find out.

      You're right that most of the time, Jaguar does do a prebinding fixup in the background when it something incorrectly prebound. That assumes that the prebinding isn't so badly hosed that it can't launch, however.

      At least in my case, when 10.2.2 (or was it 10.2.3) did this to me (after crashing during optimization), doing an update_prebinding fixed the problem. Whether it will help for the 10.2.8 early adopters or not, of course, is anybody's guess.

      As for the exit, updating prebinding does some scary stuff in the VM system. If it were me, I might continue booting, but giving advice to others, rebooting is a good idea. :-)

      --
      120 character sigs suck. Make it 250.
  34. Problem on a G4 dual 867 mhz by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was downloading the update this morning (via Software Update), left the room, came back a few minutes later and my screen was blank...as if the machine were sleeping. Nothing would rouse it, however.
    I ssh'd in and tried killing various processes but nothing worked...couldn't even reboot!
    Only thing that worked was a hard restart (holding down the power button) and then running fsck a couple of times.
    Everything is OK now but that was most un-Apple like.

    1. Re:Problem on a G4 dual 867 mhz by wadetemp · · Score: 1

      I have the same, and FWIW haven't seen this issue. I've had it on without me around for 4 hours without touching it. When I came back the screens were blank, which is my setting, but the fans were still loud-as-usual so it wasn't sleeping, and it snapped out of it fine. I've been though several successful sleep/wake cycles as well.)

    2. Re:Problem on a G4 dual 867 mhz by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

      My machine wasn't really sleeping either...it just appeared to be (have it set for 3 hours and I was gone for less than that). Mine is also working fine now so I guess it's nothing to worry about...just not very Apple like, is it?

  35. Said it before say it again by kev0153 · · Score: 1

    Procrastination pays off again. I got home from work today already to install the patch to find that it i s gone. I think I would have been ok, have a new iBook.

  36. Re:Pulled? Wow. by Meowing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fuuny thing is, on one of the runor sites a day or two ago, there was an article about 10.2.8 getting released internally to Apple, and that public release might be delayed because some unspecified problems cropping up. Makes you wonder if whoever is supposed to say "stop the presses!" called in sick on the wrong day.

  37. iBook by Robowally · · Score: 1

    No obvious problems or improvements on my iBook G3 500.

    --
    Karma? Sorry, i don't believe in superstition. http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz
    1. Re:iBook by iCat · · Score: 1

      My PowerBook G3 boots twice as quickly as before.

  38. Classic and OS9 are different by bob_calder · · Score: 1

    ... so an install of 9 is just OS9 and Classic is a shell.

    I gave up OS9 for Lent last year. Now my machine is twenty pounds lighter and can do a four min. mile!

    --
    Any preoccupation with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct shows an arrested intellectual development. (Wilde)
    1. Re:Classic and OS9 are different by Analog+Penguin · · Score: 1

      Doesn't matter--any bootable OS 9 system folder should be useable as a Classic startup folder. I had this same problem a while back, and I wish I could tell you what fixed it--suddenly, it started working.

  39. Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by zpok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Darn, I feel left out!

    Any other Cube owners without problems? Maybe we could start a support group...

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
    1. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by tenton · · Score: 1

      Yup, all is well with my Cube at work. G4 733 at home has no problems, either. I was going to tempt fate with the Powerbook G4 400 at home, but since they pulled it...

    2. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by hobbit · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid to say that my cube is also without problem. Well... there's a small cosmetic default in the case that looks like a crack, but other than that... ;)

      --
      "Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something" - Plato
    3. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by javaxman · · Score: 1

      I know of two computers which have had the 10.2.8 update applied. One is a cube with a processor upgrade, the other is a G4/533 single-CPU AGP machine.

      No problems to report with either. From what I've read, it may rather specifically be DHCP which causes problems. The update was probably only pulled because, well, screwing up someone's networking is a very serious matter. It could be difficult to download other updates!

      I have to say, those Cubes are fantastic machines, especially considering the processor upgrades which are available for them. One interesting thing I learned when we did the processor upgrade: the fanless cube actually had a built-in bracket for a fan, which comes with the CPU upgrade.

    4. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by zpok · · Score: 1

      yep, I love mine, it's small, inobtrusive, silent and still pretty fast and solid.
      The weird optical start-button and the awkwardly placed connections sometimes combine to shut down the machine when changing a usb or firewire devise and I have installed a bigger hard drive, but apart from that it's a perfect out of the box experience.

      How much does such an upgrade cost and could it be shipped to say El Salvador?

      Cheers

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    5. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by javaxman · · Score: 1
      The processor upgrade we installed was from Sonnet and they may be available from one other manufacturer as I recall. As for pricing and availability, I'll let you do your own Google search, but I seem to remember the prices beating the heck out of getting a new machine.

      The upgrade does, as I implied earlier, involve putting a fan in your cube ( awww ) but it's a rather quiet fan, probably you won't notice the difference in noise. In El Salvador, you might want that extra cooling anyway.

      Installing the processor upgrade involves a nearly complete disassembly ( and hopefully, reassembly ) of your machine, so unless you're technically skilled and inclined to do so, you may want to find someone skilled to do the job. Having said that, if you're careful, good at following directions and don't lose any of the many screws you'll have to remove, it's not _that_ hard...

      There *is* a way to change the start-button so it causes 'sleep' instead of trying to shut down your machine. Do a search of Apple's support site, you might find something on that. I'd tell you but I wasn't the one to do it and don't know how it's done. It's also a simple matter to disconnect the cable to the switch, which you might not want to do unless you have a keyboard with a power button... but that fixes any start button issues! I know this last bit works OK because someone had a cube where the button went flaky.

      Just to bring this post back on-topic, unless I'm reading the technote wrong and *only* the dual-processor machines are affected, I think the cube would potentially have some of the problems described in the Apple Technote on this issue but your network connection might save it, as is likely the case with our cubes, which are of course quite connected to a high-speed switch...

    6. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by zpok · · Score: 1

      Hey thanks :-)

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    7. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Considering that your sig refers to software as "soft", I think I'll look elsewhere for my localisation needs, thanks.

    8. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by zpok · · Score: 1

      Signature test

      Hope you don't mind my abusing this post...

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
    9. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Not at all, be my guest. I hope your headache has subsided.

    10. Re:Cube - DHCP etc: no probs by zpok · · Score: 1

      it has, thank you.

      --
      I think, therefore I am...I think.
  40. It Needs to be Said by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    It just works. But how, exactly?

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  41. Re:Well.... tsarkon reports apple puke fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    you fucking fags. hahahaha. your untested sub-enterprise grade piece of shit fucking garbage ass shit OS.

    with a shit deprecated mach kernel that is slow as fucking ass and error prone.

    with your fucking shit *nix userland that barely makes the grade.

    with your fucking robbing Jordan Hubbard, who went from being christ to the FUCKING FALLEN ANGEL TRAITOR FUCKING BASTARD.

    FUCK YOU STEVE SLOBS, and your DRM crusted fucking music low quality shit.

    FUCK YOU APPLE, for living solely because you made an Ipod, a rip off replacement for a staid tired concept: Walkman (with DRM).

    and finally, your spyware crusted shit ass fucking software, your heavy CPU wasting shit UI, your fucking shit hardware, overpriced and underpowered fucking cunt shit lie on BENCHMARKS like spec you fucking asshole liars.

    And your fucking JVM is shit.

    YOUR FUCKING JVM IS SHIT.

    Fuck you.

    FreeBSD rules, and you cunts suck this crap down. You fucking suck it good, and pay out the ass. Steve needs your money for his fucking Gulstream. And you give it like the little stupid fucking bleating pigs you are.

    FUCK YOU ASSHOLES.

  42. tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    you fucking fags. hahahaha. your untested sub-enterprise grade piece of shit fucking garbage ass shit OS.

    with a shit deprecated mach kernel that is slow as fucking ass and error prone.

    with your fucking shit *nix userland that barely makes the grade.

    with your fucking robbing Jordan Hubbard, who went from being christ to the FUCKING FALLEN ANGEL TRAITOR FUCKING BASTARD.

    FUCK YOU STEVE SLOBS, and your DRM crusted fucking music low quality shit.

    FUCK YOU APPLE, for living solely because you made an Ipod, a rip off replacement for a staid tired concept: Walkman (with DRM).

    and finally, your spyware crusted shit ass fucking software, your heavy CPU wasting shit UI, your fucking shit hardware, overpriced and underpowered fucking cunt shit lie on BENCHMARKS like spec you fucking asshole liars.

    And your fucking JVM is shit.

    YOUR FUCKING JVM IS SHIT.

    Fuck you.

    FreeBSD rules, and you cunts suck this crap down. You fucking suck it good, and pay out the ass. Steve needs your money for his fucking Gulstream. And you give it like the little stupid fucking bleating pigs you are.

    FUCK YOU ASSHOLES.

    HAHAHHAHAHA. MUHSHSHSHSHAHAHAHA!

    FUCKERS!

    1. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tourretts syndrome *chicken pot, chicken pot, chicken pot PIE* got you down?

    2. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
      Fo shizzle my nizzle you fuckin whore. You mother fuck fuckin bitch whore. Yeah yeah sugarbear. Gooowaaaaaaaaa! bwahahhaah Offaah matooki.

      Hahahahaa. Bwahahaha!

      I would like to complain about a detestable criminal. For starters, Fucker faced pigfucking god damn fuckheaded wreteched pig fucker Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt makes it his job to draw nymphomaniacs and child porn stars. I believe it needs to be taken into account that he is completely full of shit. In my effort to uncover his prejudices, I will need to call attention to the problem of his perfidiousness. When you least expect it, his opinions will turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a mad vat of vigilantism. Couldn't you figure that out for yourself, Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt? His claims will portray obstinate monsters as children any day now. I do not wish to endorse diabolism, but rather that to illustrate that I would sooner eat puke than become one of Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt's minions. His desire to toy with our opinions is incontrovertible evidence that he harbors some yellow-bellied grudges. Would we, as thinking people, believe writers who tried to tell us we're all petulant? I say "no." Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt's tactics constitute one of the many conduits of faddism in our culture. This screams of the old belief that money-grubbing devil-worshippers like him are merely unstable and disagreeable nebbishes. If Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt thinks I'm too diabolic to tell you a little bit about him and his bloodthirsty actions, he's sadly mistaken. I have taken the liberty of letting him know that I once had a nightmare in which he was free to leave in a wake of mischievous reaction. I wish he had. What I want to document now is that his brand of extremism is irrelevant here or anywhere else. By this, I mean that Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt has become increasingly unprofessional ever since childhood. It's a well-known fact that self-centered confused-types like him don't have a clue. For the moment I will concentrate on the fact that he frequently progresses into displays of authority he doesn't have. I truly do not intend this to be in any way misinterpreted as a personal attack on Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt. Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt, you are welcome to get off my back this time and stay off. He is wrong. His criticisms will cause more harm than good. As I mentioned before, nobody seems to realize that these kinds of nerdy cynical cretins should be dealt with immediately. The continuing deliberate misunderstandings of some of his condescending leeches merely underscore this point. Does Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt really know anything about the theories he claims to support? No, he doesn't. He and his cronies are hideously deviant puppets. I am quite certain that he has shown he's not afraid to be mean-spirited. I don't think it would be unfair to say that militant louts like him tend to conveniently ignore the key issues of this or any other situation. Imagine a world in which Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt could spawn delusions whenever he felt like it! Is his raging anything other than puerile narcissism? There are situations where certain remarks are appropriate and there are situations where they are not. This is not to say that he could think for himself even if he tried. It is merely to point out that he is off his rocker. Like other shabby naive-types, Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt will certainly replace love and understanding with Marxism and isolationism. It is ridiculous that we have to be faced by such smart alecks whose asinine beliefs should be treated with apathy. It is apparent to me that all he does is inspire drugged-out philosophies. To him, acting like an inconsiderate perverted-type is a lot of fun. Stupid Prick motherfucker asshole bitch prick cunt

    3. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tsarkon you suck.

      you swear like a preacher - repetitive drivel interspersed with words you scoured from a thesaurus.

      come on you really need to up the quality of your work.

      fucking amature.

    4. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by nate+nice · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ha ha, one of the better trolls I've ever seen. rofl.

      --
      "If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, A hope-er, a pray-er, a magic bean buyer ..."
    5. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you 99%.

    6. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid bitch. It is spelled "amateur."

      Oh, you're on a Mac, no spellchecker that works. I'm sure you can spell Steve Job's Anus though. You're used to licking that.

    7. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lame, instead of taking some construcive criticism, you retort with a pitiful attack on my spelling. Your amature status becomes more evident when you don't have time to go over your work - clearly the amount of energy you put into your trolls needs to be refined. The price to performance ratio is too high.

      FYI, this was composed in Internet Explorer. running on Windows 98. now lets see what kind of stupid insult you have about that.

    8. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at who is lame here - I don't see your brand identity anywhere...

      Swearing is good. You told me not to swear. How about this. Fuck You.

      Use or the word lame against me indicated lack of sex. Sexually frustrated people, such as yourself, use the word lame all the time because of self referential issues with a limp penis.

      I never use a Thesaurus. Just because you have limited capacity, doesn't mean others have the same liimited vocabulary.

      This was composed on elinks 0.3. Over OpenSSH 3.7.1p2. On Lin-sux. (FreeBSD or DIE). Now, so fucking what? So fucking what. I'd rather you use Win98 and scrotum IE than OS X and Fag Safari crash.

      You are irrelavent and serve one purpose. To pave a venue by which I can can continue to espouse. You motherfucker. Eructating bullshit such as the cruft you have posted before Is Not Becoming. I am become Shiva.

    9. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sexually frustrated? I'm not the one putting all the energy into creating second rate trolls. If you're having a hard time getting some, perhaps you should take up patroling your local glory hole - I'm sure even your chode would be welcome.

      I wasn't criticizing the fact that you swear - I was criticizing the fact the you don't swear well - in that regard you truly are amateur.

      hugs.

    10. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the looks of this discourse, you are aren't even a troll. Mindless ass-whelp more like it. Energy? You think that, despite being hilarious to non-dullards, this takes up a lot of cycles. You sure think too much of yourself. You maybe ate a few spare cycles today. I find watching buttfucks like yourself try and tear down TSARKON cathartic.
      Now, as far as swearing goes. The fact it got your attention means it did exactly what it was supposed to do. It's supposed to be over the top and appear poorly constructed. I'm laughing at my own creations. I'm laughing now. HAHAHAHAHAHA. FUCKERHEAD! The PAX ROMANA of computing is over, in part due to SlashFUCK and pissers like you. You fucktard fuckerface. I feel the urge to defecate when I read fucktripe like this. Your cheap shylock shyster computer you bought ouf a bargain bin with cum stains and cigarette ash. You are an Infantile penis lips. You get no poonani, mofo. Your cuncasket fuck mouth continues to eructate bullshit. You have a giant bleeding brain hematoma you fucking cuncasket. You are a weird, cuntcaskety mediocritomaton miasma of festering caramelized dog shit mixed with grey matter in that quagmire cesspool you have going in that vacuous cavern that is your skull. Forged when the world was young, when man and bird and beast were one, and death was but a dream, there is You, the fuckety fuckstick, who makes motherfucking shit.

    11. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c'mon man - that was just far too laboured, you're trying too hard. and the way you broke into rhyme near the end?
      you mince around in rainbow T-shirts much?

    12. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suck on deeze nuts, ho.

      Nothing you said so far even pretend to be creative or funny.

      Your ridiculous attacks and attempts at assasination are falling to the floor, swatted down with the greatest of ease. You are a sad, sad panda.

    13. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now what you just heard now was a little kicking
      But let me tell you this while the clock is still ticking
      This is the warning, know as the caution
      Do not attempt to diss
      or you'll SOFTEN
      Just like a pillow, or better yet a mattress
      You can dis this style or attack this
      Way of FUCKING YOU IN THE ASS.

      This shit just flows like a river
      or better yet a stream
      and you fucking gay ass aint on the winning team
      so dont ever in your life even think about an argument
      cause youll get walked on like CARPET
      Ill pick you up
      dust you off
      But my fucking BOOT on your HEAD

    14. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you got me all wrong tsarkon, you should be thanking me for trying to help you improve your work, I have no intention to assasinate(sic) you.

      In this day, where quality is so lacking in almost everything, I have gone out of my way to do you a favour, without honest criticism how can you ever hope to improve - your comments in their current form would likely appeal to the 9-13 year old range - those that are still amused by naughty words, admittedly, alot of the older cliche living with their parents types, would still get off on that type of thing, but that audience isn't really something you should be proud of entertaining.

      I realise that you likely have trouble thanking people, hell you may not even truly comprehend how much benefit I am to you, but fear not, you need not voice your appreciation - I'll take it as a given.

    15. Re:tsarkon reports APPLE FAGS SUCK hahahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that trolls, and my trolling to be of considerably higher quality than most "insightful" and "informative" posters. I am much better than the editors too. Well, anyone is. They are fools.

      I also trounce upon fat sexless live at home unemployed zit thinkGeek pricks regularly.

      You started your attempt at "making me a better troll" by saying I suck. I am versatile, funny, and can be serious. My log here on slashdot is glorious and long, and I have no trouble stirring up the shit. I have posts that have even been up-moderated, not that I need Slash-shit aprecation, because of being hilarious and or dead right.

      Toilet humor, potty mouthing and the like are a good place to start in my estimation. I love seeing "superior" armchair assholes write you off for coming off as crass or chidlish, but they themselves are completely fucking wrong about something.

      If you are spreading the word of Tsarkon, then I thank you. Why dont you dig for me and find me samples of my writing, which are chronicled here, and show me the pieces you like best.

      I'm always willing to modify my trolling to be more agravating and appealing, and as always, I amd right. So if you were to show me something out of the Tsarkon archives that is closest to perfection, I might be willing to take that slip out of the suggestion box.

      For we are held prisoner here by the Editor fuckers. They try this YRO bullshit but engage in fucking censorship. Hypocrisy runs high.

      My audience is much broader than teenage or live in basement losers, I can assure you that.

      I hate the hypocritical sellout loser editors most.

  43. so, install X11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and use OO
    PP is for weenies anyway
    no optimization for interlace
    no timecode support
    no distributed system support
    no I/O support

  44. Re:Well.... tsarkon reports apple puke fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    troll my ass

    this should be +10 hilarious.

    even if you hate what he says, he has a penchant for ripping and asshole like no other.

  45. enlightening by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and ever so helpful :-p

  46. Re:Well.... tsarkon reports apple puke fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    why does apple software call home. my interpretation of his rant about spyware is that it is true that software for apple calls home, with the bastion of this being photoshop.

    its disgusting that they facilitate invasion of privacy.

  47. tsarkon reports on apples legacy of murder, hate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Oh now, here we go with another stupid, uneducated filthy Apple zealot. I know more about computer than you will ever know, trust me. You lameness is gushing out at this point. Your foolish statement was rife with conjecture and assumption. I find amusing, your OS Crap, I mean OS X. Simple idiot software, incomplete userland, terribly slow, inferior SCSI-less, ECC memory less crap hardware. If you were a Mac zealot in the day, you had a leg to stand on, now. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. Whatever, troll. I do use Windows, for games. You wouldn?t know what games are because you have a Mac, and well, there is a Warcraft III, and?. and?? Well anything PC users had 3 years ago you can play that. And half the things you have to do like defrag, have to be done off a boot CD HHAHAHAHHAAH. First you have a gay resource forkie easily corruptible HFS+ fs, then its subject to fragmentation, and then there is no online defrag API. AHHAHAHA. Other than games I use no Winderz. I have a myriad of hardware at my disposal, and I tend to like to spend most time in FreeBSD. You might have an idea of what that is because its them same userland Apple tried (and failed miserably) to port to OS X. And you stupid Mach kernel was deprecated by Carnegie Mellon in 1994, and microkernels are now considered obsolete. Sorry. You first non complete shit kernel, like that in OS9, is a fucking lame, slow, out of date kernel. HAHAHAHA.

    So you can sit there, on your overpriced, slow box. With firmware that blocks memory and CPU upgrades, and your sexless existence waiting for your next unemployment check, because you are indebt, all apple users max out their credit cards because they are stupid and live in dreamland. All Apple users are the first to be laid off in a company downsizing because they do nothing. And you can sit there, in debt, living off the taxes I willing pay, and you can try to bark at me like ht troglodyte troll you are and try to sink me down to your level, a mediocritomaton in a pathetic self congratulating "communisty."

    And about your "best of show," the Apple X-Shit. A server with: No SCSI, not hardware RAID, no ECC memory, 2GB memory limit, and two CPUs so slow that Motorola doesn?t even publish the SPEC CPU2000 mark. HAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. BWAHAHAHAHA. You people are so pathetic it makes me crack up.

    The 286-based IBM AT already had the right components for preemptive multitasking and memory protection. It's not IBM's fault that MS software did not take advantage of what the hardware could offer. At the time (http://www.computerhistory.org/timeline/1984/inde x.page), the first Macs shipped with 68K cpus that did not even have virtual memory management(http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com/pape rs/otherOlderPapers/anothermacpaper/virtualMemory. html). Also, PC hardware shipped with 9-bit ram so there was always one bit for parity while the Mac shipped with 8-bit ram. 9-bit is of course better because you can tell when a bit accidentally flips. It wasn't till the Mac IIfx that any Mac got 9-bit ram. (http://www.apple-history.com/IIfx.html) [Because of cost cutting measures, most desktops today regardless of PC or Mac do not have parity.] It also had a 400KB floppy drive instead of the AT's 1.2MB drive. And 128KB ram to the AT's 256KB. About the only advantage the Mac had was a pretty GUI (which you could get third-party apps. for the AT) and the 8-bit sound. And it's been the same ever since. PC's were the first to get almost everything you see on the Mac today. Notable exceptions are FireWire and possible SCSI. (I'm not too clear about SCSI.) But SDRAM, PCI, ATI graphics accelerators, Nvidia graphics accelerators, etc. all came on the PC first.

    I think the two most innovative things to come out of Apple in a long, long time are Quartz and Firewire. But we can get Firewire on the PC now, so the only thing that is missing would be Quartz.

    Why would an avid PC user care about what CPU Apple will use next? Because that dictates whether or not I can potentially

  48. FIRST CAN'T POST! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    I'll never speak again, I promise. ;)

    I did notice that the "Network Info" widget in Konfabulator no longer shows my WAN address. Otherwise no problems on my 733 Quicksilver, and still buying a 15" Alum. PB.

  49. No wonder they pulled it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I need to vent guys and here I hope I find sympathy! I HATE MAC'S

    Today I spent the good part of five hours helping a friend with a titanum powerbook put an 802.11 card in, she bought an apple Airport one. The first amazing thing comes when it doesn't fit in the slot, but a quick call to the apple seller and they tell me it has to go INSIDE THE MACHINE. My friend had opted not to get them to install it as it was an extra $20 fee, so she took it home and I got the job as I'm the "Computer Guy" and can generally help friends and family with there computer problems. I have never seen such a tragedy of design as the TiBook!

    First I had to take the entire thing apart. This if youve been inside a laptop is not an easy trivial task. It needs the batteryu and case to come off, the drive and optical drive to come out, and apples STUPID design inside them mean I had to file away some parts as they were put in without obviously meaning to be taken apart again. Now I know computers are throwaway things nowadays but that's rediculous? We also had to use snips to cut some tiny pieces of shielding off to get to the right screws. I can see why they were charging so much to put the card in, she should have gone with that option! In the end finally I was able to lever up a part of the inside to push the airport card inside and click it in place. But that wasn't enough, an aerial cable then needed to be connected, and getting it out of its holder was another half hour of work where I had to pull the airport card out again!. Finally with it all back together it works. The inside I think is back where it should go. the back doesn't go back on how it should either and I think is a little bent.

    I don't, I really don't, see how Apple can claim to be tops in design. Even my A600 was a dream to work on compared to this and it was pretty compact too!. Why they couldn't put it in an easily accessed slot like normal PC notebooks I dont know. Anyway Ive talked my friend into getting rid of her mac addiction, she will definately be buying a Dell next

    1. Re:No wonder they pulled it by nystagman · · Score: 3, Insightful
      OK, it's my turn to feed the troll, I guess...

      I have installed AirPort cards in several TiBooks. And I have never had it take longer than 10 minutes to do so, and with absolutely none of the difficulties you purport to have encountered. And maybe if you had bothered to do even a little research on the procedure, you could have saved some time by learning that you needed to deal with the antenna lead first. or even the very basic fact that the card is meant to go internally (wasn't the $20 install fee clue enough?), leaving the PC slot free. But why should a "Computer Guy" need to do that? A more professional approach would have been to actually KNOW WHAT THE HELL YOU'RE DOING BEFORE YOU EVEN START THE JOB. Five hours is so far beyond incompetent that it makes my head spin.

      If this was (and it sure sounds like it) your first TiBook experience, I'd like to point out that you're saying some pretty strong things, based on an n=1. Doesn't say much for your objectivity, for it would appear that your mind was made up long ago, and you've chosen to immediately rant and vent, and paint the world in broad strokes, believing that it supports your position.

      And it's a bit of a non sequitur to link your poor job of dealing with the TiBook with a problem in the 10.2.8 upgrade. Once again, it looks like you need to justify your emotional biases however you can, and willfully disregard all the positive data reported about Apple's history of delivering solid software and updates on a pretty regular schedule.

      If you care (and I see no reason to believe you will), I have witnessed many more QA problems with Dells. The IT folks across the hall from me at work spend joyous hour upon hour dealing with them, noting an especially high occurrence of "crib deaths."

      And by the way, here are all the apostrophes you seem to have mislaid: '' ' ' '' (And a few extras for good luck.) We'll leave it as an exercise for the class to find the multitude of grammatical, spelling and logical errors in your diatribe.

      P.S. And congratulations on curing your friend of her addiction; you're the quintessential "Computer Guy," all right.

      P.P.S. In summary: 1) grow up; 2) learn to write.

      --
      Theory and practice are the same in theory, but different in practice.
    2. Re:No wonder they pulled it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Install of an airport card is easier than plugging ram in, on *any* computer jack-ass. I throw the bullshit flag. Dell sucks. p.o.s. computers.

    3. Re:No wonder they pulled it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, plugging ram in on a TiBook involves unlocking and lifting the keyboard and plugging ram in

      To put an Airport card in one requires unscrewing the case, opening it, and sliding the card into an internal slot, then putting the thing back together. That's harder than plugging RAM in.

    4. Re:No wonder they pulled it by Angostura · · Score: 2
      0. Next time read the manual, such as this one here (pdf)

      1. Now pay your friend for the damage you have done to her computer by unecessarilly filing, snipping and apparently bending bits of her computer.

      2. Refrain from calling yourself the "Computer Guy" until you are at least moderately clueful

    5. Re:No wonder they pulled it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, I think you really need to take a closer look at a TiBook and stop talking out of your ass. look at a picture of one, and see the airport slot on the left side of the machine. see the pretty slot? plug the pretty card in it.

    6. Re:No wonder they pulled it by jr416de · · Score: 0

      Obviously you have never even seen a TiBook and are just remembering a drug induced halucination. Installing an airpot card in a TiBook should take about 15 minutes, most of that time spent removing/reinstalling the screws that hold on the case bottom. If you removed the drives etc. then you are an idiot and that certainly isn't Apple's fault (unless you are Steve's bastard love child or something). What your friend needs to get rid of is you, not her Mac.

    7. Re:No wonder they pulled it by jr416de · · Score: 0

      Yes, that should have been airport, not airpot. The pot was one of the things the troll must have been smoking.

    8. Re:No wonder they pulled it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't even need to remove the case to do it. 2 clips and the keyboard comes out and there is the slot.

    9. Re:No wonder they pulled it by slackingme · · Score: 0

      People seemed to be biting the "17 meg file" troll less and less, and making more and more jokes about it lately. I guess we've got our replacement now.

    10. Re:No wonder they pulled it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? A Dell like the Inspiron D500? Which has not only an internal, dedicated, 802.11a/b/g card slot, but also an internal, dedicated, Bluetooth slot? Which, just like the PowerBook G4, you have to open up the system to access?

      Just because you're too lazy and/or stupid to read the documentation before tearing a system apart is no excuse for bitching about having to file down components and being unable to put the system back together (note: that previous thing might have something to do with the latter).

      Not only are the steps for installing an 802.11 card covered in the documentation provided with the laptop, it's also available online in PDF form. All you needed to do was park your butt in front of a internet connection for a few minutes to discover the facts you needed in order to do the job right.

      Somehow you strike me as the hick who works on cars. For some reason his car always breaks down and he's always replacing major components. Simple things like torque wrenches (at $20-$40 they're "expensive") or repair manuals (ditto) are not found anywhere near your toolbox, yet you spend hundreds of dollars each year due to stripping bolts and jamming things together in a way that they weren't intended.

      If your friend spent $75+ on a 802.11 card and then balked on a $20 install, maybe this is your clue that they're taking advantage of you. Charge by the hour, and your 5 incompetant hours will teach them a lesson - at the very least it'll remind them to hire competant people the next time.

      I did an 802.11 install inside of 15 minutes. However, I don't have an MSCE - perhaps that's your problem right there.

      "I see dumb people. They're all around me. They don't even know they're dumb."

  50. Re:Pulled? Wow. by babbage · · Score: 1

    Try rebooting a couple of times -- I started getting errors on boot that the 10.2.6 driver was "incompatible" with 10.2.8, and so was contributing to a security risk. Plus, the firewall doesn't seem to be working -- some people have reported weird glitches with it, and I can't seem to get an inbound connection on e.g. my web server. So the driver isn't quite working, and I'm a little nervous that the system is going to be unstable with a mismatched system driver in place. The driver replacement workaround does not seem to be the right long term fix here, even if it gets things up & running again in the short term.

  51. "How many reached instantly with glee?" by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Yesterday a fellow Mac owner posted this "insightful" boast on Slashdot:

    OK, so how many of you Apple owners saw this, and reached instantly for the Software Update with glee?

    And how many thought the same when the latest Windows Bloat Patch ^W^WUpdate came along? not many? thought as much :)

    oh the joys of being a proud owner or a 12" PB.....

    hmm maybe I need to update my .sig - ... And Mac OS X just gets out of the way, letting you do what you wanted to do...

    And today, as the saying goes, pride goeth before the fall, eh, Puggs?

    Any wise Mac user who has seen the crippling tendencies of at least two prior OS X updates knows better than to crow about them, let alone apply them on the same day they're released. Except in the mind of fanboys, the age of the 100% trustworthy Software Update has yet to arrive.

    It's pretty easy to avoid getting burned. Ask yourself: is my Mac working? Do I need this update today? Have I waited a few days to see what happened to the early adopters and, er, the glee club? ;-)

    1. Re:"How many reached instantly with glee?" by mduell · · Score: 1

      Could you inform us of the other 2 cripling OSX updates/patches?

    2. Re:"How many reached instantly with glee?" by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Could you inform us of the other 2 cripling OSX updates/patches?

      I'll voluneer one that bit me: 10.2.5, released on April 10th disabled support for USB hubs. If you had gear on a hub, as opposed to directly connected, it stopped working.

      It wasn't fixed until 10.2.6, on May 6th. That's almost a month unable to use peripherals.

      That said, it looks like Apple learned their lesson. When they discovered this ethernet problem they pulled the update. So, that's a step in the right direction.

      The cynic would point out that a disabled ethernet problem would cost them far more to fix since there's often no solution but to call tech-support if you can't hit the net - the USB problem was 'auto-repaired' by Software Update.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  52. Re:Pulled? Wow. by ekc · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they rushed this one out under pressure to plug the OpenSSH security hole? If so, I guess...well...they succeeded then, didn't they? :-)

  53. Re:tsarkon reports on apples legacy of murder, hat by Maserati · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Lotta time on your hands ?

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  54. No problems here.. by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    Quicksilver 733: OK
    iBook 800: OK
    Graphite 400 AGP: OK

    The only anomaly I saw on two of them was some of the documents on my desktop had the wrong icons after the post-install reboot. They went back to normal after another reboot.

    Needless to say, when the revised update surfaces I won't rush to install it on any machines at my clients. The three machines that I did today were non-critical.

    ~Philly

  55. The next update by iJosh · · Score: 2, Funny

    10.2.8.1? My OS update and my IP address. Woo! 8')

    --
    Moderating to further my personal world domination agenda... and to get chicks.
    1. Re:The next update by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for giving me your IP address. I'll be hacking into you're computer using a remote ssh exploit now.

  56. Revolution 7.1 by QuantumSpritz · · Score: 5, Informative

    DO NOT INSTALL IF YOU HAVE A REVOLUTION 7.1 SOUND CARD INSTALLED! The update disables the driver, because the .kext driver specifies a Darwin version below that of OS 10.2.8 I wonder what they'll call the 10.2.8 update when they re-release it? 10.2.8.1? This brings them awfully close to 10.3, and they usually roll some fixes in to the old OS when they release a new one.

    1. Re:Revolution 7.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, they could come out with 10.2.9, then 10.2.10, 10.2.11, etc. I could've sworn they even hit x.x.10 before in a previous OS X incarnation.

  57. Security updates by phch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What I want to know is, why did Apple bundle the security updates with everything else? The only thing I want from 10.2.8 is the patch for the OpenSSH bug. Even M$ provides security updates separately from their Service Packs and assorted malware.

  58. I had some problems... by jnetsurfer · · Score: 1

    After the update, my display resoultion was reset to 640x480, Thousands of colors. Also, certan icons refuse to display properly on my desktop. (Both were problems listed on macfixit.com) Dual G4/500 MHz in case you care...

  59. Might explain reported problem with OSXvnc by erik's+dad · · Score: 1

    I work with the developers of OSXvnc and we've received a report that it isn't working under 10.2.8. I now suspect that it's the rumored network problems at work. Heck, it works under Panther. I couldn't figure out this morning why a few minutes after I installed the upgrade via software update, my coworker's machine didn't find it. We went out of our way to download it from the Apple web site in the hopes that it would include a fix to a Safari bug that keeps crashing it several times a day (objc: message _blinkCaret sent to freed object).

  60. having network problems by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1
    I installed the update on my powerbook G4 1ghz, G3/450, and G4/450 at the same time (stupid me). Since the two desktop machines are just servers in the corner with no keyboard/mouse/monitor, I can't check those, but my powerbook isn't seeing all computers on the LAN anymore.

    out of the 4 PCs and 3 macs, I only see one machine in my servers window... I can't connect to them using the ZeroConf (rendevouz) address (blah.local), or the IP, but the machines that are set up to respond to external ports are working fine when I use the external domain name, although, I'm getting a bottleneck with the 10base/t router. Grrrrrr....

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
  61. new OpenSSH vulnerabilities? by quarkscat · · Score: 0

    Could it be that Apple pulled the 10.2.8
    update to take care of the newly discovered
    vulnerabilities in OpenSSH 3.7.1.p1 ?

    The new OpenSSH 3.7.1.p2 was released earlier
    today. When Apple pulled the plug on 10.2.8,
    I got a broken 1/3 of the update (sorry snail
    slow dialup connection).

    1. Re:new OpenSSH vulnerabilities? by johnjosephbachir · · Score: 3, Informative
      10.2.8 fixed the ssh vulnerability, even though the version number might not suggest it:

      $ ssh -V
      OpenSSH_3.4p1+CAN-2003-0693, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090609f

      "CAN-2003-0693" refers to the vulnerability.
  62. dual 867 two thumbs up by maccw · · Score: 0

    nothing wrong. Updated this a.m. and I am still sitting here working away some 12 hours later. My ass is falling asleep but i don't think its related to the update..

    --
    My karma is getting better everyday.
  63. I warned Steve Jobs.. by CooCooCaChoo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, I warned Steve Jobs that hiring the young man, Murphy Law as the new head of quality assurance was a bad idea but of course he assured me that Murphy was an optimist ;-)

    Damn you Murphy!

    --

    "The difference between pornography and erotica is the lighting" - Woody Allen

  64. How about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...They include in some of those "USB device compatibility" issues the ability to see my Zip 650 USB CDRW on my iBook? (they supposedly work fine on G4 boxen) That would be nice. I've got to save up to be poor so even adding a reasonably priced firewire lacie is out of the question for awhile.

    It kinda works with patchburn but that's even more annoying than it not working at all. Messing with that kinda reminds me of weekends lost to bleeding edge Linux desktop goodies. Multi-session burns borks the whole box to forceable shutdowns At least I can burn CDs from iTunes store DLs. I must say though, it still beats the hell outa my Linux desktop buffoonery ;-) BTW, it's not an 10.2.8 problem, I was just hoping the update would have made it work. Supposedly it used to work on 10.1.x

    Oh, fixing ssh would be good too. I go all over hells half acre in Terminal land an X11 with this thing...

  65. Re:Pulled? Wow. by Trillan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, they pulled System 7.5.4 after some problems were discovered with the updater. It barely made it into the market, though.

    I believe they also pulled one of the 10.1.x updates, but I can't remember which.

    I'm quite happy with 10.2.8. It finally fixed my USB!

  66. If you were logged in... by FredFnord · · Score: 1

    If you have the machine set to auto-login, next time wait two minutes and watch the clock. If it doesn't change, then at the very least your display server is toast.

    Well, or the clock program is dead. But that seems unlikely.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  67. jeeze by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well i guess i was lucky enough to download all 40816490 bytes of the MacOSXUpdate10.2.8.dmg at ~2.2k per second just to find out it doesnt work for tom and sally imac user

    do i dare hope for darwin 6.9?

    bow chicka chicka bow wow

  68. Oh the irony by chia_monkey · · Score: 1

    Quite quite ironic. After everyone (me included) posted how great it is to snag a Mac update the minute it comes out and how Windows updates usually go for days or weeks until they are installed for fear of breaking something that isn't broken. Guess we should all keep our mouths shut and stop jinxing ourselves. Damnit! (luckily mine seems to be fine on a 500 MHz TiBook *knock on wood*)

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  69. "Soviet", "Microsoft" ... whatever by jolshefsky · · Score: -1, Troll

    In Microsoft Russia, software updates pull YOU!

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  70. Re:firewall problems not related to 10.2.8 by klui · · Score: 1

    If you have any programs that modify the default ipfw settings, your control panel will say another firewall is running. Stuff like PC emulators that have a virtual ethernet driver will modify the firewall settings.

  71. And in other running gags... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I, for one, pull the welcome for our newly updated overlords...

  72. No problems with my 15" PB by amichalo · · Score: 1

    Not to excuse an upgrade that does damage (should SW vendors have to have a hipocratic oath akin to Doctors' - "first do no harm")

    My 15" 400Mhz 1st generation Bowerbook G4 (now nearly 3 years old) is doing just fine with 10.2.8.

    This will serve as a wakeup to me to be sure to give Panther a week or so before I plunk down the cash and roll the dice with system stability.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  73. Mod parent up!!! +20 Informative by tm2b · · Score: 1

    Thank you so much. You've just saved both a dual 1 Ghz G4 Powermac and a large window from destructive interference.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  74. worked fine for me by dwightk · · Score: 1

    I have a Powerbook 12" Superdrive, and have had no problems...

    --
    Like anyone can even know that
  75. Re:Awww Crap.... by Lord+Grey · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth: I have a nearly identical setup (with an old 500MHz G3 laptop instead of a G4) and experienced exactly the same thing on my dual-G4. I had logged in and actually used the machine after the update, but it seemed dead the next morning. Haven't had a problem since, after repairing permissions, and I experienced no other problems on either machine at all.

    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
  76. Me too then! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go ahead and hack into my box too then!

    192.168.9.27

    schmuck -- 192.168. and 10. are reserved for private intranets and are simply not routed over the Internet.

  77. Stutters by mbbac · · Score: 1

    My Blue & White PowerMac G3 has been acting up since upgrading from 10.2.6 to 10.2.8. There are times when the system will pause and not accept any input -- but the mouse pointer still moves around the screen.

    --

    mbbac

    1. Re:Stutters by Slur · · Score: 1

      I see this only when a connected Mac goes to sleep. The system hangs waiting for a response from the sleeping Mac in the other room. Very silly. I hope this is fixed in Panther.

      --
      -- thinkyhead software and media
    2. Re:Stutters by mbbac · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, mine is doing this with only one computer on the LAN and with no network drives mounted.

      --

      mbbac

  78. Add another success by valkraider · · Score: 1

    I have 2 machines upgraded, an 800Mhz G4 flat panel iMac, and a 500Mhz G3 iMac DVSE. Both running 10.2.8 just fine, none of the problems I have seen reported have affected me. YMM(will?)V

  79. Changed? How about the microkernel? by UNIBLAB_PowerPC · · Score: 1

    This sounds to me like Apple did a small mod to something in the underlying system and...

    Yeah, it's called the Mach microkernel. Hosed or not hosed, go look at the date on the microkernel and let me know what you think Apple fucked up. Between the mk's date and kernel extensions breaking all over the place, what do you think happened? Seriously, I want someone else's opinion. There's the obvious ethernet extension that is borked, and the not so obvious like my third-party wireless drivers.

    This update made my PowerBook G3 "Wallstreet" a doorstop -- gray screen of doom at startup, and it will finally boot after over an hour of waiting. And then guess what? After that insanely long wait, I get an error telling me system problems are preventing me from logging in. WTF? So I reboot in verbose mode, and the network is constantly stalling while my IOxperts 802.11b driver is complaining that it can't find the network -- all while I get at least 500+ messages sprinkled in there telling me how it's waiting for Application Services to start. So it comes up after over an hour, and then won't let me log in. Great.

    After trying safe mode and single user mode to no avail, I boot from an OS 9 CD (Diskwarrior) to let me poke around and observe the destruction. The most obvious change is that Apple swapped the microkernel out during this upgrade. Go look for yourself.

  80. M-Audio card owners: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    As you might have noticed, 10.2.8 killed your M-Audio Revolution. They posted an updated driver last night, and on my system at least, the card works again.

    If you want to know -
    G4 800 dual
    1.5 GB RAM
    GeForce 3 / ATI Radeon
    OS X 10.2.8
    M-Audio Revolution 7.1

    Get the update here...
    http://www.midiman.net/support/driversear ch.php

    jaz

  81. Xeno's Paradox Redux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Mac OS X 10.3 will never be released because first 10.2.8 has to be (re)released, then 10.2.9, then 10.2.9.5, then 10.2.9.5.5, then....

  82. Re:Well.... tsarkon reports apple puke fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yay, tsarkon is back!!! More mindless drivel for slashdot.

  83. One of the iTunes updates by Microsift · · Score: 1

    didn't one of the iTunes updates wipe out most of the contents of the harddrive?

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
    1. Re:One of the iTunes updates by speechpoet · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Check out http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/OSX/itunes2_erased_driv es.html for details.

    2. Re:One of the iTunes updates by speechpoet · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Check out XLR8 Your Mac for details. (Reposted to make link clickable. We're nothing if not full-service here at Speechpoet, Inc.)

  84. No trouble here by ioErr · · Score: 1

    I updated my eMac to 10.2.8 as soon as the update became available. Everything still works. As usual.

    The ethernet drivers work, the system doesn't suffer any kernel panics, the computer doesn't boot slower...

  85. Pulled updates by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure 10.1.2 got pulled and turned into 10.1.2.1 right damn quick.

  86. Classic apps not associated by huffnickel · · Score: 1
    Running a 12"PB.
    When launching a file previously associated with a classic application, it doesn't run: doesn't even boot classic. When I launched classic from the System Preferences, it required an update, but still didn't recognize my file association.
    I had to manually associate the file type with the classic app in the end.
    Otherwise, no problems so far...

    Still prefer these sorts of problems over the hell of updates and hotfixes for my Windows servers.

  87. Mirror? by Sophrosyne · · Score: 1

    I missed out on the update and still want to update my mac and see what happens... does anyone have a mirror to a standalone installer???
    Thanks!

    1. Re:Mirror? by dnahelix · · Score: 1

      me too

      --
      Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
      They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
      I Hate \.
  88. Re:Well.... tsarkon reports apple puke fags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    You have it all wrong, prick. I come back when the mindless drivel exceeds a threshold. People like you do a lot to make that happen.

    Are you trying to insinuate that there was ever a time without mindless drivel, mostly written by the fucking editors?

    You're a dumb prick.

  89. Re:Awww Crap.... by dema · · Score: 1

    I just installed the updates this morning on two computers. PowerMac Dual G4 1Ghz MDD

    Same here. My DP 1.25Ghz MDD seems to be doing just fine with 10.2.8. If you look at the Apple support forums there have been some recent posts about the update causing battery problems in some laptops.

  90. Tsarkon Reports The Shit at WORK psbbt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know hearing of feces, shitting in your pants, and other such things makes you excited, so I thought I would post this:

    I was sitting there pondering if I should fart. My ass was percolating something fierce. It was a hard, coprolitc shit earlier, hard and tearing at the rectal walls. I thought I cleared my colon like a dog on Ex-Lax. I was thinking, the percolating bubbling brown latex paint like mixture with bergs of snickers - was it all out?

    I ripped a few sets of ass without event. The farts came off as a sour rhubarb and garbage smell; quite relieving. Bunting a few always feels good.

    Then the mother of all farts came. This was promising to end my ass cheek shifting (to prevent impregnation of the rancid gas into the polyurethane cushion) and squirming to expulse the swamp gas already trapped air in my seat cushion.

    I ripped ass, and instead, I got a brownie batter mud pie splashing out the crack in my ass; a tidal wave of feculent slime. Oh fuck; it stinks so bad! Now, as I sit here I am stuffing Kleenex in my ass through my fly and the barn door on my underwear. If I can get enough of those in there I might have a chance to congeal this liquidy mess into a brown potato of feces and Kleenex.

    Fuck! I just ran out of Kleenex and poop is on my fingers and now as I'm typing smearing on the keyboard. Fuck. This shit smells so bad. I just took my nice champion socks off and put them in there in hopes of arresting further doo doo river flow.

    Welp. After about 8-10 minutes and two rolls of TP I'm back. I grabbed a can of Lysol and some anti bacterial soap and am spraying off my area and replacing the chair. I lost my keyboard in action; listed as KIA, by action of the South Colon Regular Army.

    Oh fuck, that was a percolating brown festering quagmire of swampy, rhubarby smelly caramelized shit to remember.

  91. TechNote #107669 - it's all networking, folks... by javaxman · · Score: 1
    Here is the technote, folks!

    It's pretty clear; it's all networking ( and slow networking at that ), which explains why some people with the described machines have no problems. All of the other problems reported are likely of the typical well-what-did-you-do-to-your-machine variety, not a direct result of the update.

  92. Works ok for me by mgudites · · Score: 1

    I've got it on my new 15" Powerbook. Being an IT person I should really know better, but usually when an Apple update comes out, I just install it regardless of what the consequences might be. I should probably stop doing that huh...

  93. Found it!! by Sophrosyne · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://public.www.planetmirror.com/pub/apple/Mac_O S_X/MacOSXUpdate10.2.8.dmg

    1. Re:Found it!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That link doesn't seem to work. Here's one that does:

      http://public.www.planetmirror.com/pub/apple/MacOS X/MacOSXUpdate10.2.8.dmg>

  94. deductive reasoning to the core! by zpok · · Score: 1

    That's quite alright easter, considering your use of the word 'considering' I've inferred your programs suck.

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
    1. Re:deductive reasoning to the core! by easter1916 · · Score: 1

      Aw, poor upset Dutchman.

  95. taking the hint with more grace by zpok · · Score: 1

    Apart from the fact that your remark is a bit on the anal side, you're right. the sig is indeed sloppy. I am pretty anal and precise myself - as far as my translations are concerned, so I'll bow my head and try to take the hint with grace.

    Actually, I have a splitting head-ache right now, so forget about the bowing and the grace part...

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  96. Some links never die... by Game+Genie · · Score: 1

    Googled this up in 5 minutes.

    http://download.info.apple.com/Mac_OS_X/061-0677 .2 0030922.PkN45/2Z/MacOSXUpdateCombo10.2.8.dmg

  97. OpenSSH vulnerabilities not a likely reason by lars-o-matic · · Score: 2, Informative

    No indication of that in the articles (did you read them?) -- an Ethernet driver bug and boot problems on some models of Mac would be reason enough.

    Beside, why pull the update? Smarter to release a separate (much-smaller) openssh patch afterwards rather than hold back the entire, ~40 Mb 10.2.8 package.

    As a fellow dialer-up I feel your pain at the ever-larger updates. Fortunately, I have bandwidth at work and can bring home the standalone packages on a ZIP disk from an office Mac.

    --
    je ne suis pas un fou
  98. 10.2.8 [installer] reducing battery life by tonzack · · Score: 1

    Yes, this has happened again. Back in the days of 10.2.6, I used to own an iBook, where upgrading from 10.2.5 to 10.2.6 using the Mac OS X 10.2.6 Combo Update reduced my battery's (reported) life from 4:35 to 2:05 hours. At that time, I didn't know why it happened.

    Now I changed my iBook to a PowerBook G4, and upgraded 10.2.7 to 10.2.8, and the same thing has happened.

    I did have one hiccup though -- the screen saver kicked in, causing the system to hang during optimisation where it could not start the selected Screen Effect to run as the screen saver. I was forced to restart the machine during a time an upgrade was taking place. But I don't think that this would have contributed to the problem since a replacement power management driver got written to the disk anyway, and the system would have taken that into account on the next startup.

    So, I installed the upgrade again, in the hopes that the installer would just overwrite the relevant files. This time, the upgrade succeeded (because I disabled sleep and the screen saver).

    LESSON 1: disable all system extensions that would disrupt the operation of the installer.

    I learned from the iBook ordeal that the fault occurred during installation time, and that users who installed their systems on a full battery did not experience any unexpected changes to their battery life or capacity reporting, and I myself concluded that this would have to have been the case, given my experiences and the overwhelming evidence provided by the discussion group for iBook users.

    LESSON 2: only apply a system update when the battery is fully charged.

    I changed by battery under warranty to solve the problem... and it looks like I'll be doing it again unless a software solution to this problem can be found. A software issue caused this mess... surely a software fix can be formulated to deal with it.

    My next step is to charge the battery to 100%, and re-run the update installer again to see if this "fixes" the battery calibration issues. I'll get back to this discussion and tell you the outcome.

    For anyone who thinks I'm joking... here's evidence of the aftermath! I didn't mean to do it--I installed it without checking my battery charge at the time--but it's done, and is proof to me that the problem will be with us until an effort is made to find and fix the bugs in the system kernel code that deals with the maintenance of the battery, especially at module initialisation.

  99. Beige Rage by Krashed · · Score: 1

    No it is pretty hard for find a beige computer these days. Try finding a beige computer at your local Best Buy, you won't. Most PCs are black and grey, sonys are blue-ish purple-ish, and hp are something other than beige too.

  100. Re:Awww Crap.... by Feral+Bueller · · Score: 1
    Serves me right in not waiting 2 days before I applied the updates. Some were having problems but most were do to people running haxies.

    Yep. I had some "UI modification utilities" running. My Dock went to Jeebus.

    For those of you complaining about the Dock, try not having one for a day.

    Fortunately I back up better than Sir-Mix-A-Lot's dancers.

    --
    - learn to swim.
  101. where's version 10.2.7? by Englebarnetk · · Score: 1

    Okay, I hav just come home from military and read in the mac forums that osx have come in version 10.2.8. Well, I am running v.10.2.6 on my powerbook 667mhz, and software update tells me that my software is up to date. I can't find any standalone updates for 10.2.7. Does this mean that that version also have been pulled?

    1. Re:where's version 10.2.7? by piscoBandito · · Score: 1

      No, 10.2.7 was a special update for the G5 PowerMacs. there is no updater available since that's the shipping OS on the G5's.

      I don't even know if 10.2.7 will run on a non-G5 mac. I think the kernel is incompatible with 32-bit PowerPC CPU's.

    2. Re:where's version 10.2.7? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10.1.7 is also on the new PowerBooks. It will run on a 32 bit machine.

  102. 10.2.8 and APPLE(DOESN'T)CARE TECH SUPPORT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, agreed 10.2.8 affected a small population, but my gripe is more with APPLECARE, or more appropriately, APPLEDOESNTCARE.

    Spent $500 on it with initial purchase of my PB17, and just a dreadful experience with their tech folks. It's like they've memorized the "Redmond Mantra" of "Reboot, Reinstall" but modified it as "Archive Install".

    That was also the response to the 10.2.8 fiasco.

    That's their answer to every problem I've had since June (3 separate incidents).

    No troubleshooting, no actual "thinking" (differently or not...) -- just plain lazy if you ask me. "Gee, I don't know..." is the most technical thing I've ever heard them say.

    I ask, if they don't know, who does?!? They're the VENDOR!

    Fixed the 10.2.8 etherNOT ;-) with the kext replacement hack, so that's up and running (whew!)

    2nd most recent issue I ended up fixing ON MY OWN with a parallel install on FW drive, then a little kinkiness with a command-line "bless" and voila! problem fixed.

    $500 is a bit steep when all I assume I'll ever get is hardware replacement.

    "Archive Install" (qv. "lose a week of my time reinstalling apps and recovering data from backups") is NOT tech support.

    And they want to sell me Xserves? I get this GARBAGE from them with a PB, you think I'm going to trust them with my SERVERS???

    When pigs fly...

    *grumble*