Slashdot Mirror


Red Orchestra, UT2003 Mod, Released

Neophytus writes "The first public edition of the long awaited Red Orchestra mod for Unreal Tournament 2003 has been released. 'Red Orchestra brings you in-depth infantry combat on the Eastern Front of WWII. With the emphasis on realism and authenticity, the Soviet Red Army meets the German Army on the ground across battlefields from Kiev through Stalingrad and on to the Reichstag in Berlin. Real weapons. Real battles. Real soldiers.' Download from FilePlanet (free reg. req.), FasterFiles, more."

191 comments

  1. what is this, number 12? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yay, another ww2 shooter...

    1. Re:what is this, number 12? by cosmo7 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this has real battles and real soldiers. Not that stupid computer-generated stuff. They're real. You actually get real soldiers. Of course the downside is that you probably have to arrange their funerals, as the battles are also real.

  2. In... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Red Army Russia we don't need video games to kill!

  3. Uhmm right.. by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I can respect a free Unreal Tourney mod set in the WW2 universe, I must ask this:

    Doesnt this add to an already overblown selection of World War 2 based FPS's?

    Heck the best thing about the Desert Combat mod for 1942 is that its NOT about WW2!

    --
    | - | - |
    1. Re:Uhmm right.. by Locmar · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are quite a few WWII FPSs out there, true, but most of them are pretty Quakey and unrealistic, and none that I know of have treated the Eastern Front with due respect.

    2. Re:Uhmm right.. by fleafan · · Score: 1
      ..and none that I know of have treated the Eastern Front with due respect

      Then allow me to recommend Battlefield 1942. As realistic as these things come without losing gameplay. And lots of Yak's, Katyushas and whatnot from the eastern campaign.

    3. Re:Uhmm right.. by randyest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Doesnt this add to an already overblown selection of World War 2 based FPS's?

      No, not at all. In order to add, it would first have to meet, then somehow exceed the current offerings. Or at least bring something significantly different to the table.

      Note that this mod include no vehicles. It says it will include vehicles for ut2k4, but that's not out yet, so with this, you get no vehicles. So what we have here is a WWII mod for an FPS, without vehicles, introduced into genre ruled by Battlefield 1942, which has planes, tanks, jeeps, ships, and every other kind of vehicle you'd expect. That you can really drive (and ride in while someone else drives).

      So, this doesn't even meet the current standard (bf1942). Maybe before bf1942 this would have been interesting competition for MOHAA or RtCW, but now it's just one more of the same old. And how is this News for Nerds or Stuff That Matters?

      Is /. now going to turn into planetslashdot.com? I can't wait for the ourly announcements such as "]00l dude wants you all to know that they just managed to get a new model to compile for their upcoming uber-l337 killemall mod. Here's a screenshot of the new model with a plain grey skin. Kewl, eh? Oh, and they need coders and artists, so check 'em out!!!!!!"

      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:Uhmm right.. by heli0 · · Score: 1
      announcements such as "]00l dude wants you all to know that they just managed to get a new model to compile for their upcoming uber-l337 killemall mod. Here's a screenshot of the new model with a plain grey skin. Kewl, eh? Oh, and they need coders and artists, so check 'em out!!!!!!"
      That is hilarious because it is so true.
      --
      Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    5. Re:Uhmm right.. by Locmar · · Score: 1

      Though in all fairness I've never actually played it, doesn't BF 1942 just give the Russians American weapons? I know on the back of the box, there's a prominent picture of Russian holding a BAR. That's not what I call 'due respect' or 'realism' :p

    6. Re:Uhmm right.. by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Heck the best thing about the Desert Combat mod for 1942 is that its NOT about WW2!

      Desert Combat is unbalanced, too fast, and attracts a large number of idiots and smaktards.

      Vanilla BF1942 for me thank you.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    7. Re:Uhmm right.. by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In order to add, it would first have to meet, then somehow exceed the current offerings.

      That sentence makes no sense at all. I guess it's just a weird reach for some clever rhetorical hook. If I join a football squad, but can't beat the current striker, I'm still an addition to the team.

      Maybe if the squad was already at full capacity, adding me doesn't supply anything new, but that's exactly what the poster was suggesting.

      And when there's a question of if a new contender is good enough to be considered, it should be held up not against the best of the others, but the worst- for that's the one who'd be displaced first.

      introduced into genre ruled by Battlefield 1942

      BF1942 currently has 9000 players online, a huge chunk of them in the non-WWII Desert Combat scenario*. Meanwhile, the Activision's Quake-engine games (forked throughout several variants) have 16000 players total.

      *It's really funny how the success of Desert Combat has undercut EA's future plans for the "Battlefield" franchise. They were plainly intending to step through 20th century wars in a commercial series, starting with Vietnam, and now a free mod to their own game is becoming suffocating competition to their new releases.

    8. Re:Uhmm right.. by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Realistic ? Mmm hmmm. It's all about the gameplay, but it is rpetty cool.

      If you want it real, try IL-2 Sturmovik: Forgotten Battles. It's a Russian-developed flight-sim, very realistic, absolutely gorgeous, and it covers pretty much the entire Eastern Front.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    9. Re:Uhmm right.. by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      I'm not exactly sure how comparing a WWII mod for UT2k3 and a full-blown WWII game, designed from the beginning to be such, is considered insightful...

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    10. Re:Uhmm right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok i'm logged into my redhat box.

      point me to the glut of ww1 or ww2 fps games i can play on my redhat box.

      THIS IS SLASHDOT YOU FUCKING MICROSOFT FAG.

      DIE.

      oops. sorry lost my mind there for a second. i didn't mean to do that. i just lapsed into zealot mod

      HEY YOU INSENSITIVE ASS MUNCHING CLOWN, WTF, THIS IS SLASHDOT, AND I'M USING A @!#$%^&*( LINUX BOX....SHOW ME THE #$%^&*%$@ WW2 GAMES THAT ARE SO PLENTIFUL!!!

      die.

      oops. i really must apologize. part of me things you are a complete f'n idiot.

      who needs a lead pipe bounced off your head.

    11. Re:Uhmm right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no need for ww2 fps' to simulate ww2, just load up a civ2 scenario ^_^

    12. Re:Uhmm right.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were a lot of weapons exported to Soviet Union during WWII.

  4. I'll be downloading this one! by MysticGlyph · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The single biggest complaint I hear about Unreal II is the unbelievable weapons and non-traditional sci-fi style maps. Now with this mod maybe people will give the Unreal engine another chance. .

    --
    Try my new smokable Sig, ...Sig-erette.
    1. Re:I'll be downloading this one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a bunch of dick-biters would complain about that. I think all that sci-fi shit is awesome. The full potential of sci-fi style maps hasn't even been covered yet.

    2. Re:I'll be downloading this one! by higle · · Score: 1

      Wait... wasn't that 2 complaints?

    3. Re:I'll be downloading this one! by randyest · · Score: 1

      That's odd, the single biggest complaint I've heard (and mine is really only one) is that it sucks.

      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:I'll be downloading this one! by kidgenius · · Score: 1

      I believe that Americas Army: Operations was built on the UT2k3 engine before the actual game was out. And that seemed like a fairly realistic/non-scifi game.

    5. Re:I'll be downloading this one! by eliza_effect · · Score: 1

      No, America's Army was built on the Unreal Warfare engine, which is somewhere inbetween UT, and UT2K3. Regardless, if it's fun, who cares what engine, period or theme is utilizes?

  5. Link by evilmuffins · · Score: 2, Funny

    That Faster Files link, won't have faster files anymore...

  6. UT2k3 or UT2k4 by AdamBLang · · Score: 1

    The /. article says 2k3, the site says 2k4. You got my hopes up.

    1. Re:UT2k3 or UT2k4 by Vaevictis666 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Mods for UT2k3 will be binary compatable with 2k4. Mods for UT2k4 that don't involve any of the fun new stuff (like vehicles) will likely be compatable with 2k3.

      UT2k4 is the same old engine, same old content, _plus_ some fun new stuff like more than double the maps, more character models, a few new (and some almost-old) gametypes, and more than cursory vehicle support. Oh yeah, and further graphics/networking optimizations.

    2. Re:UT2k3 or UT2k4 by randyest · · Score: 1
      Mods for UT2k3 will be binary compatable with 2k4.

      Mods for UT2k4 that don't involve any of the fun new stuff (like vehicles) will likely be compatable with 2k3

      But according to the Red Orchestra "features" page:

      • All new high detail environments in World War 2 Eastern Front settings.
      • Experience famous battles from 1941 to 1945.
      • The Wehrmacht and the Red Armies are the two core fighting forces.
      • Complete arsenal of intricatly detailed uniforms, equipment and weapons used in battle
      • Branch System
      • Limited Reinforcement System
      • 3d Voice Communication (UT2004)
      • Multiple weapon functions.
      • Realistic damage system
      • New multiplayer gametype that brings Area Control to the next generation.
      • New scoring system, putting objectives and squadplay at highest priority.
      • New Machinegun and Sniper Rifle systems.
      • Vehicles used for transportation and combat purposes (UT2004)


      So, I'm confused. Does this mod work with ut2k3 or not? I mean, it has vehicles, but we all know ut2k3 doesn't support vehicles (you don't have vehicle support until you can drive them yourself, preferably with friends riding along, as you can in bf1942 -- note that "vehicles" stuck to pre-set tracks have been around for a long time, and no one cares anymore). But it also says "(ut2k4)", so maybe the vehicles magically work with ut2k4 (which isn't out yet), but disappear from the maps (or don't work?) in ut2k3.

      In any case, this mod includes no vehicles, yet wants to be a good WWII FPS. It failed before it even began -- bad engine choice. Vehicles are integral to WWII FPS action, and if the Red Symphony maps are playable without them (as they must be to work with ut2k3), then the vehicles aren't very integral to the gameplay, which means it sucks. If it does include vehicles (and therefore doesn't work with ut2k3), then this news is premature, since no one can play the mod until ut2k4 is released. (That would make it rather amazing pre-cognitive coding, though.) In that case, let's wait for real vehicle support to get into UT (2k4 -- we promise!), then wait for the furor over the lag they add to die down some, thena few dozen patches later we can talk again about it. So, I'll meet you here in mid-2005 to discuss this further :)
      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:UT2k3 or UT2k4 by Anonymous+Coed · · Score: 1

      I think the vehicles won't be available in the Red Orchestra mod until UT2004 is released.

    4. Re:UT2k3 or UT2k4 by Maserati · · Score: 1

      As others have pointed out, vehicles are coming next year. But they aren't essential at all. DoD and RtCW have been very successful without vehicles. The infantry always was the final arbiter and many infantry-only actions were fought during the way.

      But, ok. You like vehicles. Fine. I've been trying to promote the use multiple crews in my WW2OL squad, the 105th Panzer Brigade. We're a combined arms unit with, of course, an excellent armor unit. I think you'd fit in, as several other members are also a bit nuts :-) Tell 'em Maserati sent you.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  7. Commies by Grahhh · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you kill enough commies does it say Fuhrer Kill!?

    1. Re:Commies by Kenja · · Score: 1

      Doppelte Totung

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Commies by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 1

      we should really create a new genre for these games :

      YAWN = Yet Another WWW2 moficatioN

  8. Where's the .torrent, smiley? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

    Don't you dare post another damned fileplanet link ever again.

    Sheesh. I'll go to kazaa before I go to fileplanet.

    Not that I find another WWII game all that enticing in the first place.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Where's the .torrent, smiley? by Broodje · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I see fileplanet, I pass and wait for it to show up on usenet.

    2. Re:Where's the .torrent, smiley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, why? Is it the fact that you have to make an account? I didn't think it was a big deal, and it's just plain convenient to be able to d/l everything in the way of patches, demos etc. all in one place. I mean, it's free and the d/l's are super fast, what's not to like? Yeah, sometimes on the very day that releases show up you have to wait in line, but when you factor in the speed of the d/l it's better than pulling it from some overloaded server in Taiwan or something.

    3. Re:Where's the .torrent, smiley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's a pain in the ass, the queueing is lame, and it's frankly not that fast. Last time I used it for anything, I ended up in queue for 45 minutes to eventually get a download at a whopping 20KiB/s when I would have gotten 150 from the local warez pub.

    4. Re:Where's the .torrent, smiley? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I hate getting a 200KB/sec download while paying $6.95 a month for all the patches, maps and other bullshit in one place. Try and get a mod off Kazaa, what fun! While you are still waiting to reconnect with uber_dood for your download I'll be playing and probably deleting whatever new mod is out there even before your first 20 megs has been downloaded off Kazaa.

      Happy leeching!

  9. War games by Elektroschock · · Score: 1, Funny

    I personally don't like war games. This one is special. Stalin or Hitler? Whom do you prefer? ;->

    1. Re:War games by r · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      there's a joke along those lines. if you ask a pole whom to shoot at first, germans or russians, what will he say?

      germans first. business before pleasure.

      for example the warsaw uprising, which i bet the mod doesn't even consider. when poles started an uprising against nazi occupants in warsaw, the red army was right outside the city - but instead of helping they sat on their hands and waited for germans to massacre half of warsaw.

      and then my friends wonder why we have such a massive chip on our collective shoulder. :)

      --

      My other car is a cons.

    2. Re:War games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my favorite war game is global thermonuclear war

    3. Re:War games by caluml · · Score: 1
      and then my friends wonder why we have such a massive chip on our collective shoulder. :)

      Were you around then? Has this affected you personally?
      I mean, using the same logic as you, I should in that case be angry with the French, Spanish, Germans, Romans, Vikings, etc, etc. But none of them have ever done anything to me in my lifetime, so why should I have any problem with them?

      People are just people. We all like the same things.

    4. Re: War games by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > I personally don't like war games. This one is special. Stalin or Hitler? Whom do you prefer? ;->

      OTOH, you don't have to worry about the good guy loosing...

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    5. Re:War games by ice-monk · · Score: 1
      I personally don't like war games. This one is special. Stalin or Hitler? Whom do you prefer? ;->

      Stalin
      Hitler

      --
      --- You know it's bad when
      bash-2.05a$ fortune
      bash: fortune: command not found
  10. My opinion... by TypoNAM · · Score: 0, Troll

    is that Quake 3 engine does a better job of being used in a WWII game such as Return To Castle Wolfenstein and Wolf: E.T.

    Becides I've played America's Army Operations v1.90 and it just sucked horribly. I prefer engines that use OpenGL anyway. :p

    --
    This space is not for rent.
    1. Re:My opinion... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My opinion is that Quake 3 engine does a better job of being used in a WWII game such as Return To Castle Wolfenstein and Wolf: E.T.
      May I ask why?

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    2. Re:My opinion... by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      I always vastly preferred the bot AI in UT, but I suppose that doesn't matter for multiplayer.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    3. Re:My opinion... by sproketboy · · Score: 1

      I don't know about TypoNAM, but ET is great. It's fast for lan/internet games, has very team-oriented ruls and it run on Linux too!

    4. Re:My opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> >>My opinion is that Quake 3 engine does a better job of being used in a WWII game such as Return To Castle Wolfenstein and Wolf: E.T.

      >>May I ask why?

      Because I have a 200MHZ PII you insensitive clod!

    5. Re:My opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this have to do with the WWII genre in particular?

    6. Re:My opinion... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      ET is the bomb, without a doubt one of the greatest time sinks I've ever run across.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    7. Re:My opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does this have to do with the WWII genre in particular?

    8. Re:My opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, because the Quake 3 physics engine was modelled after the real Normandy beach graviton waves, er, because it, um, its textures can do grayscale WWII, um, it has some Wolfenstein code in its genetic background which um... Look, we just wanted control of that oil, okay??!? Quit going on about all that no WMD and no links to al-quaieahda and no uranium deals from south africa and Halliburton corruption crap and just believe that you're safer from terr-rists now, alright?!?

    9. Re:My opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, I do believe that the world is safer from terrorists now.

    10. Re:My opinion... by antiMStroll · · Score: 1

      America's Army uses OpenGL, otherwise there couldn't be a Linux client.

    11. Re:My opinion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong ... it was ported to OpenGL from DX. That's why there's a Linux client.

  11. ./ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank god I was aware of this before it got slashdotted. Also that I decided to risk a warning from the network admin and d/l it at work. All the mirrors are going to be swamped now.

  12. What's the matter with this site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is slashdot running like molasses or is my ISP sabotaging slashdot?

    Only 5% of my http requests work. The timeouts drive me crazy!

    1. Re:What's the matter with this site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BSD trolls are to blame? We should set the evil bit for TCP packets that contain trolls for more selective traffic shaping!

      Man, I hate this situation. Maybe I even have to talk to somebody using my mouth to get some entertainment. But it's saturday, and there's nobody there at work. I wonder where all the other people are. I think I start with following my network cable. Somewhere on the way I will find some humans, or I even find the network problem that is disrupting my normal life!

    2. Re:What's the matter with this site? by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 1

      Well, according to internetrafficreport, everything is fine. However, Europe has been relocated to Africa.

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  13. Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by ewhac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just checked the filesize on this mod: 277 mebibytes. WTF?? I have a fairly fat pipe going to my house, but since when did it become a good idea to create demos and/or mods regularly exceeding 100 megs?

    I recently downloaded the demo for Tron 2.0, weighing in at about 200 megs. Now, I might almost think this reasonable if it weren't for a few crucial facts:

    • The demo only included three maps,
    • There were only three or four enemy models,
    • Tron, if you'll recall, is a flat shaded universe. The textures, such as they are, are dead simple, and should compress down to nothing.

    Yet, despite this, the download was 200 megs. It should have been no more than half that.

    There has to be more efficient ways to handle this stuff.

    Schwab

  14. UT2k3? more like UT2.003k! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  15. I Just Have To Say... by mongoks · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Soviet Russia...FilePlanet still sucks!

    1. Re:I Just Have To Say... by QuantumSpritz · · Score: 2, Funny

      For once, the 'Soviet Russia' comment is almost funny.

      Almost

      No - wait. It's not.

    2. Re:I Just Have To Say... by EugeneK · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the Wehrmacht invades YOU!

    3. Re:I Just Have To Say... by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      I dunno why but seriously, I laugh my ass off almost every time that joke comes up.

      There was this one: In Soviet Russia, the form submits you. I still kind of chuckle everytime I think about someone being submitted by a form.

      Half the reason I read the comments on a post is to see how that joke will be incorporated. That and the whole overlords bit.

      Perhaps I'm too much of a sucker for repetative, semi-inside jokes. I even love those combinations like:

      In Soviet Russia All Your Base are belong to YOU!

      Do I have a problem?

      Ask Slashdot: Am I addicted to stupid inside jokes on Slashdot?

      Step 1: Read stupid, repetative jokes on Slashdot.
      Step 2: ???
      Step 3: Profit!!

  16. Offtopic (Net problems) by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

    Huh.. same thing's been happening here all day (Calgary, AB).. and it's more than just Slashdot. I thought it just just me, but perhaps it's a big DDOS or new virus spreading or something?

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  17. Do you get to play as camp survivors? by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

    Can you be a camp survivor? Maybe working for the German team or running from them?

  18. Realistic? by Mithrandur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can't call it realistic until you spend the majority of your time waiting in the cold, hoping not to die.

    You can't call it realistic if you can play after you've died once.

    You can't call it realistic until the credit for every action you take is given to your superior officer.

    WWII was a terrible event. I have no problem with FPS, but to make a mockery of WWII while the survivors are still alive seems disrespectful to me. Play all you want in a Sci-fi setting. Make mods "simulating" the america civil war. But I think it would be nice to show some respect for the still-living vets of WWII.

    --
    vi is my shepard, I shall not font.
    1. Re:Realistic? by randyest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How, exactly, is it disrespectful to WWII vets to make a mod based on WWII battles?

      I've heard a lot of complaints from vets that people forget about their sacrifice, which I think is somewhat true, but I've never heard any complaints about wargames set in WWII (remember the old SSI games? I know vets that loved playing those themselves).

      Are you a WWII vet and are offended by this? If so, please tell me about how it makes you feel. Or, do you just know some vets and assume they'd be offended? Or are you just trolling? (DING DING DING - we have a winner!)

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Realistic? by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0
      Make mods "simulating" the American Civil War?

      But that era's weapons sucked. There would be a line of 30,000 enemy straight ahead, you'd have maybe 10 lead balls and a bag of gun powder for some crap musket, and if you actually got to fire them off before a cannon ball took off one of your limbs, you'd have to fight the rest with the bayonet on the end of musket. Could you imagine having to swing that 30,000 + times? If it's anything like swinging a weapon in hand to hand in MOH, no thanks. Plus the only weapon upgrade you could possibly get would be some officer's engraved sabre, or maybe get to fire a cannon. Lame. If it was a military strategy like C&C, maybe that would work. But only if you could play Sherman and destroy everything in your path, while lining up souther plantation belles for Union soldier gang bangs.

    3. Re:Realistic? by MalachiConstant · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly the same thing that my uncle said when I told him about some of these games (he served during Viet Nam, but never in combat).

      I can certainly understand that sentiment, but I think it's understood that any kind of game like this doesn't "make you feel like you were there". Take the Half-Life mod "Day of Defeat". The weapon characterisics are realistic, the sounds the guns make, the environment, etc, but I don't think anyone says, "No, I didn't fight in WWII, but I played DoD, so I know what it was like for those guys.".

      Is it disrespectful? Perhaps. Making a game out of a tragedy seems rather crass, but for the people making and playing it it was so long ago that it seems like the ancient past, even though there are still vets living today. But I don't think anyone playing it believes it simulates what the vets went through.

    4. Re:Realistic? by Mithrandur · · Score: 1

      I'm not a vet, I'm not a troll. I honestly feel that it's disrespectful of the sacrifice those soldiers made to reduce WWII to a first-person shooter.

      I like FPS games. I enjoy a good game of CTF or DM. It's not the violence that bothers me. The very act of making the real traumatic experience of an actual human being into a game (with all the unpleasent bits cut out, of course) demonstrates a profound lack of compassion.

      Both of my grandfathers fought in WWII. My wife's grandfather fought in WWII. I would be ashamed to have one of them see me taking part in reducing the most horific experience of their life to an evening's entertainment.

      There are plenty of other settings for an FPS. We don't *need* to set them in WWII. I don't think we should; not until everyone who knew that war personally is dead.

      --
      vi is my shepard, I shall not font.
    5. Re:Realistic? by randyest · · Score: 1

      [it's disrespectful] to reduce WWII to a first-person shooter

      Hmm, OK, so you're not trolling, but it may be even worse that you actually believe what you said. That is, I think it's far more disrespectful to actually think that WWII can be reduced by anything. It was what it was and is what it is no matter how many videogames, movies, books, or whatever are created using WWII as a setting.

      Is it disrespectful to WWII vets to make a movie about, or set in, WWII?

      Is it disrespectful to WWII vets to write a book about, or set in, WWII?

      Is it disrespectful to WWII vets to sing a song about, or set in, WWII?

      Is it disrespectful to WWII vets to make a board game about, or set in, WWII?

      Is it disrespectful to WWII vets to make a videogame about, or set in, WWII?

      I think the answer to all of the questions above is "no."

      If you answered "yes" to any of those, I believe you're either confusing the map with the territory yourself, or grossly underestimating the average person's ability to distinguish symbol from reality. And I'll go out on a limb and assume that even most UT players can probably do that :)

      --
      everything in moderation
    6. Re:Realistic? by Mithrandur · · Score: 1

      Ah, but what if you, as a player-character, had a futuristic (by civil war standards) pair of revolvers or something. You take on special-ops missions trying to take out strategic targets, and such.

      Or you could do Napoleon-era stuff. Mostly hand weapons and archers, but there are some early musketts. I'd really like to see a good, hand-weapon based FPS. Something with the command flexability you see in fighing games like Tekken, but with a first-person view and movement style.

      --
      vi is my shepard, I shall not font.
    7. Re:Realistic? by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      Was your uncle the son of a US Senator or some other silver spoon? How exactly does one serve in Vietnam, but never in combat?!? I don't think being a chef 'serving' in the war counts. Even logistically assisting a war effort shouldn't count as serving in a war. Now my old man, he actually did serve in Nam. He doesn't like to talk about it, but I got the chance to speak to one of his unit mates when they had a reunion a few years back. My old man clipped his share of Charley, apparently. And there's man a thing he saw that was the reason he went there with all brown hair, and came back with a head full of white.

    8. Re:Realistic? by Delron+Da+Thugg · · Score: 0

      Okay that last sentence really makes no sense. No more crack for me. What I meant to say was, there's many a reason he went to Nam with a full head of brown hair, but came back with a full head of white hair. War is hell, truly.

    9. Re:Realistic? by Drakin · · Score: 1

      I think you're looking at it wrong.

      While FPS tend to lean toward giving unrealistic impressions of things, it can also do something important.

      They can put a thought into someone's mind that the setting could be worth learning a bit more, thus increasing the awareness of the true horrors of it.

      If you want to bitch and moan, how about bitching about the FPS set in Veitnam, or the most reent ar in Iraq? Or are those alright?

    10. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well see we can make game basid of vietnam becaue it was a "conflict" and not a full war.

    11. Re:Realistic? by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1

      One of the things that's never ceased to amaze me is that the Civil War probably could have been won in a week with 15 guys and $500,000's worth of today's weapons technology.

    12. Re:Realistic? by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      i wouldn't really.

      it's not disrespectful to read an entertaining book about the events either, so long as you don't start getting funny ideas. or watch a very entertainment focused movie with clint eastwood about it either(heck, it's from a perioid that a bunch of people affected by ww2 were probably in the production team itself). many of post-war(ww1 and ww2) books published sortly after the wars were big hits among the men who served, for they helped many of the men channel their feelings about it as well provide some insider view to the conflict.

      but the main reason i don't feel such entertainment to be disrespectful is because i personally know few vets who don't have a problem with people reading light comics about the confrontment either, nor do they have a problem with document films&books that try to be accurate even if it shows that their side wasn't always valiant and noble(during such times a lot of things happen, some bad some not so bad and some very horrible). life and especially war isn't black and white and they if somebody know it!

      however i imagine they would have a problem with people trying to push the whole events into some history limbo while they're living and then extract them totally twisted from the archives for used on 2 penny entertainment. ww2 has been used on entertainment ever since the war ended, while partly a taboo subject in some countries it still is an subject that should be explored and used. in western countries there are people who don't know how many world wars there were during last century and that is much more scarier than some people playing a game in which it is very easy to die(and hopefully they understand that in real life they'd die even easier). even better if such games can be used to spark intrest in history for finding out what happened in the war portrayed in the given game, who fought, where they fought, and why they fought(which isn't because 'the other side was evil', and it is necessary to understand such motives to see them in action). it is possible to write books(and make games) about ww2 even without mentioning ww2 by labeling it as scifi and renaming characters and set the scene elsewhere. yet, what would that change except it would get past censorship more easily, when the censors hopefully let it pass because it doesn't directly point to the given taboo subjects? (some good scifi came out of eastern europe because of this btw.)

      what would it really change the game if it wasn't mentioned that it is an ww2 but the scenery was similar anyways, the uniforms were similar, or if just the textures were all neon colored? what would veterans feel about it then? probably very little unless they had already severe problems with their mental health(many of them do, and no i'm not referring to them as retarded, just snapped).

      they could add a portion to the game that included 20years of training before getting on the first mission and getting shot, though i seriously doubt that it would make it any more popular.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    13. Re:Realistic? by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      It may not be realistic (i've not played it, so i don't know) but is it a mockery simply because it is a game or is there soemthing else? I mean, Hogan's Heroes was set in a WWII prisoner of war camp. It first aired in 65. Certianly it had a lot more of a potential to be offensive than a game that comes out now, so much later.

      How about board games? There are hundreds of those. I'm just concerned that you consider the videogame form inately more disrespectful than other forms, which I cannot agree with.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    14. Re:Realistic? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      I can't see it being that black-n-white.

      A few months ago, I picked up Medal of Honor: Allied Assault because I was in the market for a FPS and had heard decent things about it.

      Loading up the Normandy Beach assult scenario... I'm not sure that I would've been able to face something like that in real life. While merely a game... perhaps not that realistic... it still enables me to mentally step into the boots of a grunt for a little bit and reflect on just how nasty a business it was.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    15. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let's also stop publishing war fiction and non-documentary war movies until they're all dead. After all, they're profting from an admittedly terrible event. Come to think about it, so are factual histories and documentaries. Repeal Saving Private Ryan and Ken Burn's Civil War now. Don't even ask about MASH.

      Or we can wait and see what war vets think. I'd wager they don't mind.

    16. Re: Realistic? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > It may not be realistic (i've not played it, so i don't know) but is it a mockery simply because it is a game or is there soemthing else? I mean, Hogan's Heroes was set in a WWII prisoner of war camp. It first aired in 65. Certianly it had a lot more of a potential to be offensive than a game that comes out now, so much later.

      There's a surprising diversity of opinion on that kind of stuff. One of my friend's father was a US bomber crewman during that war, and he was outraged by Hogan's Heroes. OTOH, the guy who played LeBeau in the show had been a member of the French Resistance and may have actually spent time in a POW camp, and apparently didn't have any strong objection to the show.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    17. Re:Realistic? by eidolons · · Score: 1

      No, it's not realistic. It's a game, that is fun. Keep in mind that kids wouldn't be subjected to this part of our history much at all if it wasn't for these games, though. How else are you going to reach out and tap a kid on the shoulder and get him interested in WW2? I don't know about anybody else, but involving games actually get me interested in the subject material. I remember Fallout got me interested in 50's counterculture. The same is true for "realistic" WW2 games. They tell a story, and might just get some kids interested in something they couldn't otherwise relate to. Putting yourself in the "shoes" of a soldier, regardless of how unrealistic, can still be a learning experience. The Army at least must've thought so, as $7 million of our tax dollars went to fund America's Army game.

    18. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=info&id=18002 63541&intl=us

      This German-Russian version of the movie "Stalingrad" really had an effect on me. I saw it in Pusan, S.Korea in 1994. The promoters had hired two Russian sailors to stand outside the movie theater in vintage WWII clothes and mock guns while in the background Russian patriotic songs played.

      Like the movie "The Seventh Seal", this movie should have been shown on Fox News before the start of the Iraqi debacle. It's simply Incredible. Unforgettable. Idiocy upclose - like in planning outsourcing to India.

    19. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be too hard to have your frags credited to a superior officer, not sure if the kids will appreciate the sacrifice though.

    20. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&cf=info&id=18002 63541&intl=us
      is dead. What is the name of the movie?

    21. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wah wah wah.

    22. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, since when do WWII games, or any war games in general, make a mockery of WWII veterans? Everyone knows the great cost of human life a war spends on the world, and actually, I have become more aware of the fact after playing realistic WWII games.

    23. Re:Realistic? by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      On a certain level, I think you might be right. But on the other hand, war itself is so twisted as to almost be black comedy.

      Disrepectful? Perhaps. But I don't really understand how it becomes any less disrepsectful to wait until after the people are dead. Is there a "statute of limitations" on respect? (or disrespect?)

      I would be ashamed to have one of them see me taking part in reducing the most horific experience of their life to an evening's entertainment.

      Well I guess we shouldn't go watch Saving Private Ryan anymore then. Yes, I know the movie is "traumatic" but most all movies still classify as "entertainment" one way or another.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    24. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      not until everyone who knew that war personally is dead"


      Why start playing that kind of FPS only when they are all dead ? Why not keep respecting the elder memory ? Wouldn't that be hypocrisy to wait until they can't see it ?
      Either you think we can play WWII games but we could just hurt the vets feelings (in that case, maybe speak with them could put everything back in order), or you believe there are moral reasons to not play these kind of game, but then why would these reasons stop to exist with vets death ?
    25. Re:Realistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they did a pretty good job on MOHAA. Watch Saving Private Ryan after playing through it. Pick up Spearhead too. The opening air-drop into France is worth it.

    26. Re:Realistic? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I disagree on two fronts (ha ha):

      First, it's best to do these things while the vets are still alive, because they can provide useful information to keep the simulations more accurate. I don't think they want their experiences to be unrepresented, either, and all of history is done a great disservice by "respectful" silence, omission and distortion. Almost as dangerous as ignoring history is cleaning it up into untroubling narratives of virtuous heroes and defeated evil. Even WW2's western front and pacific theater weren't nearly that simple: it can be also seen as a war between existing colonial empires (UK, France, USA) and upstart colonial wanna-bes (Germany, Japan.)

      Also, a simulation is just that: it's a model of a dynamic process, not necessarily a recreation of every aspect of the conflict. The more elements that are modelled in ways that resemble the behaviour of the simulation targets, the more "realistic" we can say it is.

      I might agree with the idea that we have too many military simulations, which tends to reinforce the fiction that history is primarilly about military conflicts. More political, social, and economic simulations games - and at a far higher granularity and realism than the Civ games - might be helpful. But, the biggest market for games is still boys who like guns.

  19. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Anyone who says "mebibytes" and includes a link is so cool that they should be moderated up to Score 5 Insightful posthaste. Even though their post was basically just a bunch of whiny bitching.

  20. Good History Book for background by davejenkins · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stalingrad
    Enemy At the Gates came close, maybe in it's first 10 minutes. After that, Hollywood falls far short of the horror and what really happened (as much as I can tell from reading this fascinating retelling of the battle for Stalingrad)...

    There's been an ongoing debate among us about which is the better history. On the one side Dave, Rick, and others favor the dry academic 'cause and effect' of macroeconomics and political philosophy that lead to the World War 1914-1945. Others among us push for the 'real story', the oral tradition of the grunt soldier's pains and trials from the trench in the actual battle-- it doesn't matter how the forces got there, the drama of the day comes from a baker holding a rifle.

    Stalingrad mixes both, but in an acceptable fashion: Beevor rightly frames his story around the causes and impetus behind Hitler's folly and Stalin's incompetence, but then follows those mishaps all the way down to how they drew 500,000 men in the German 6th army to starvation and death in the steppes of the Volga.

    This is not an easy read. Do not try it if you have a fear of lice, rot, cold, or desparate hopelessness-- you will feel them as you read.

    Beevor's foreshadowing was sometimes distracting, but then, as the reader, I had to tell myself that it was only foreshadowing because I didn't know the details of the battle-- this is history, not fiction. The author draws us to seminal mistakes in judgement, crucial firefights that end up dooming thousands later on, the chaos of war that brings entropy-- and death-- to millions.

    I highly recommend this book.

    (review originally appeared here

    1. Re:Good History Book for background by Lobo93 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Read it. Loved it. And to be honest, some of those stories made me horrified and saddened. At one point I had to put down the book and just shake my head in utter disbelief; I'm referring to the part where the maimed german soldier was left behind in the gutter next to the airfield. That was extremely painful to read, especially since the author swayed from his ordinary, clinical penning to a more personalized composition.

      As a former professional soldier myself, I can vividly picture the scenarios described in relation to military stratagems and political decisions, but I'm at a loss when it comes to the soldiers and their experiences and suffering. But "Stalingrad" excel at portraying both sides of the story, albeit a bit academic, as aforementioned by parent post.

      As davejenkins states: "This is not an easy read." - I most defenitely agree. But on the other hand, if you want to know anything about WWII and it's implications and horrors, pick up a copy and behold the black, writhing chaos that is war...

      --
      "The only clear view is from atop the mountain of our dead selves." - Peter Carroll
    2. Re:Good History Book for background by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent reading!

      Some of the more macabre parts seem like something out of a Kurt Vonnegut novel. What the people were living is so far from my personal experince that it seems like that the entire thing must be taking place on some alien planet.

      Soldiers from both sides were surrendering to the opposing forces, thinking that at least as prisoners they would get some food. They didn't realize that the other side was in the same situation, if not worse -- or if they did, hunger and cold drove them to desperation anyways.

      One anecdote that stayed with me in particular: a Russian soldier reported that the rest of his squad had defected to the German lines, and threatened to kill him if he interfered. After receiving his report, an NKVD officer shot the soldier for not acting to stop the defection immediately.

    3. Re:Good History Book for background by C_nemo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Enemy At the Gates came close, maybe in it's first 10 minutes."



      If you want a decent film about stalingrad you should try this one: Stalingrad, it's a german film about german soilders. Germans never have to put in some happy ending or try to cover up that they where bastards. To put is short: its cold and hopeless.

    4. Re:Good History Book for background by voodoo1man · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think a much better one on the subject is Valentin Pikul's Barbarossa. (ISBN 5-7838-0230-1 for the new printing, but I have not seen it translated to any language from Russian yet). It has a much deeper account of the political and military machinations leading up to the actual battle, recounting them mostly from the perspective of (as well as dealing with him as a man), Friedrich Paulus, and his contrast with Rommel. Despite being written in a rather informal style, it is very meticulously researched (I think Pikul claims close to 3,000 sources total, some of them first-hand), and some of his statistics really put the Russian front in perspective (something that seems to have been totally ignored by the current wave of rah-rah USA jingoism) - once he cites that just over 1% of the Wermacht forces were involved on the North African "front" in the years 1941-1942; the rest being almost entirely used in the Russian advance, underscoring Rommel's genius. The contrast he brings up in Rommel's inventiveness despite critical lack of reinforcements vs. the difficulties of the Eastern front (and the two conflict's political and strategic dependence on each other) is pretty unique.

      What really sets his book apart is his meticulous reading into declassified Russian archives.* The blunders by Stalin and his henchmen turn out to be monumentally stupid at almost every strategic decision, and even worse the deliberate repressions they bring about, justified by party doctrine. Stalin's "incompetence" as described in Stalingrad pales in comparison to the actual events.

      * Pikul's motivation for writing Barbarossa came after a series of Soviet documents were released that finally revealed the details of the fate of his father, who died defending Stalingrad.

      --

      In the great CONS chain of life, you can either be the CAR or be in the CDR.

  21. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you have to download the entire Unreal Warfare engine to play the demo. That is 127MiB by itself.

  22. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    640k ought to be enough for anybody.

  23. OT: good use for BitTorrent by EvilStein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FilePlanet absolutely sucks. It's one of the most cluttered websites I've ever seen. More banner ads & crap than most porn sites.

    BitTorrent/p2p is an *excellent* way (and legitimate way) to get game demos out.
    Why don't more companies announce "Hey, we've thrown this up on Kazaa too! Go get it!" instead?

    INstead, we get ad-laden crap like FilePlanet/etc.

    1. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by Saeger · · Score: 1
      p2p distribution would mean that FilePlanet couldn't charge for access to "premium" centralized FTP servers, so it won't happen.

      Sites like FileFront and GameTab are the fuuuuuture, Marty. These sites are really only useful as an initial index source you can trust (like ShareReactor, but legal), and for aggregating eyeballs to increase the availability of the files.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by randyest · · Score: 1

      ... FileFront and GameTab ... are really only useful as an initial index source you can trust

      You trustfileplanet?

      I'll save you a click and the approximately 45 ad impressions you'd suffer as you try to scroll down to read the relevant entry at that link:

      From planetannihilation.com:

      Virus Warning, Thursday, June 19, 2003

      If you've downloaded the Cavedog maps from Fileplanet (all except Tropical Islands) I suggest that you scan them for viruses. We apologise for any inconvenience caused by this, I can't remember which virus it was, something to do with Kazah however and was not very harmful to you rmachine. I recommend downloading something like Norton Antivirus Trial Version if you are not sure or don't have one. The maps have all been removed to prevent similar accidental infections from happening, until we can reupload them, only Tropical Islands is available since it was originally in .UFO format rather then the .EXE setup file which was infected.

      I'll be enforcing the mandatory scanning of all files being uploaded to Fileplanet and the TADC ftp due to this.

      Posted by: Zxythe

      Emphasis mine. Note the future tense in reference to the scanning of uploading files. Then note the date. Gametab is no better (and neither are most everyone else, really). You need trusted checksums/MD5 hashes for the source file, then it doesn't matter where you get it. (Except you may have to download it again if you get a bad, broken, or infected copy, but that's still better than not knowing and having to double-click that .exe, scanned or not -- there are new viruses, after all, so scanners will fail at some point . . . )

      Who do you trust, again? :)

      --
      everything in moderation
    3. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by Saeger · · Score: 1
      You trustfileplanet?

      Eh? How do you figure that from my post? I wasn't badmouthing p2p index sites when I said that they're "really only useful as sources you can trust", because that's the truth: you get the secure file hashes FROM these sites that you trust. the md4 hash is in the ed2k URL with eDonkey, and the sha1 hash is in the .torrent file with BitTorrent.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by crt · · Score: 1

      Note that the files in qusetion here are not official FilePlanet files - they are hosted site files which are posted by the hosted site and do not go through the normal FilePlanet upload/scanning/review process. They are not available on the FilePlanet site itself, only through the hosted site.

    5. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by brocheck · · Score: 1

      Because if they said 'We threw it up on Kazaa' imagine how many fake versions would pop up with viruses in them. BitTorrent is different though.

      --

      suddenly I feel very tired

    6. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      Few people in this thread seem to understand why it's different.

      It's different because it's somewhat centralized - somebody runs a server which tells the peers about each other, and hosts a torrent file which includes hashes of the file. So if you trust the source of the .torrent file, you don't have to worry. Of course, you can do this (with more effort) on any P2P by comparing checksums with a trusted source.

      BTW, does anyone have checksums and sizes for the files? The Linux version from the Norway mirror was truncated.

    7. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      BitTorrent/p2p is an *excellent* way (and legitimate way) to get game demos out.

      Oh yeah, I just saw this when the Urban Terror Beta 3.0 was out. The closest FTP mirror was slooooowwww. Noted Slashdot had a bittorrent link. Scchhhlurp! Over 300 megs and it was here in no time at all!

      I'm still waiting to buy additional half a gig of RAM to actually play that game, though... =)

    8. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by randyest · · Score: 1

      I would have noted it were it true. Read the note again, then ask anyone that downloaded (such as myself), the files were available from fileplanet.com, though you would have to search for them if you didn't link in from planetannihilation.com

      --
      everything in moderation
    9. Re:OT: good use for BitTorrent by randyest · · Score: 1

      You, or someone using your account, wrote "Sites like FileFront [slashdot.org] and GameTab [gametab.com] are the fuuuuuture, Marty. These sites are really only useful as an initial index source you can trust".

      That's how.

      --
      everything in moderation
  24. Fileshack.com mirror by Boone^ · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Fileshack.com mirror by Xenolith · · Score: 1

      Fileshack is just as bad as FilePlanet, sorry.

      --

      Journal
  25. A minor quibble or two by echucker · · Score: 1

    The stick grenades aren't stuck in the Wehrmacht soldiers' belts. (Disclaimer: clips on grenade heads were pretty uncommon). Other than that, they have done an incredible job modelling the gear. I did WWII re-enacting during my high school and college years, and have most of the gear seen in the screenshots sitting in my closet. The Kar98k, Moisin Nagant, P-38, PPSh-41, and MP-38 all get high marks, with the possible except of the G43, which looks like they modelled it with a bayonet lug it never had.

  26. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is why I invented the Internet.

  27. Is it real? Or is it unreal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in-depth infantry combat on the Eastern Front of WWII. With the emphasis on realism and authenticity, the Soviet Red Army meets the German Army on the ground across battlefields from Kiev through Stalingrad and on to the Reichstag in Berlin. Real weapons. Real battles. Real soldiers.'

    With all this emphasis on "reality" and taking from real battles, I wonder what percentage of kids get their knowlege of historical events from video games? Is that a bad thing?

  28. Getting UT2003 working with kernel 2.6.0 by Saeger · · Score: 1
    FYI: If you're running a 2.6.0-* kernel with the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5 fix for RPM installs, you may be getting a UT2003 startup error like:

    Could not load OpenGL library
    History:
    Exiting due to error

    The nonobvious but simple fix is to modify your 'ut2003-demo' or 'ut2003' startup script by adding "unset LD_ASSUME_KERNEL" at the beginning, and adding it "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" back at the end (so RPM will work again).

    Google couldn't help me out with this problem, so I wasted an hour messing around with libraries and linker crap before stumbling upon the fix (and google will eventually index this post for someone else... looking for candle trucks to rent.)

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Getting UT2003 working with kernel 2.6.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more evidence that linux will never be ready for the desktop. esp games.

    2. Re:Getting UT2003 working with kernel 2.6.0 by ThreeFarthingStone · · Score: 2, Informative

      The nonobvious but simple fix is to modify your 'ut2003-demo' or 'ut2003' startup script by adding "unset LD_ASSUME_KERNEL" at the beginning, and adding it "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" back at the end (so RPM will work again).

      You probably don't need to set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL at the end of the script. Each program has a separate environment, initially inherited from the program that launched it. So "export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5" (in sh and bash scripts) only applies to programs launched by the ut2003 startup script after that line. Since its at the end of the script, it does nothing. In fact, the script would not need that line at all unless it wanted to run RPM.

      To demonstrate (on OpenBSD, where LD_ASSUME_KERNEL probably has no meaning):

      $ export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.2.5
      $ printenv LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
      2.2.5
      $ cat > sampletfsh
      #!/bin/sh
      # a script

      checkcondition() {
      if [ -z "$LD_ASSUME_KERNEL" ]; then
      echo ut2003 works, rpm does not
      else
      echo rpm works, ut2003 does not
      fi
      }

      echo starting...
      checkcondition
      echo unsetting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL...
      unset LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
      echo pretending to run ut2003...
      checkcondition
      $ chmod 700 sampletfsh
      $ ./sampletfsh
      starting...
      rpm works, ut2003 does not
      unsetting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL...
      pretending to run ut2003...
      ut2003 works, rpm does not
      $ printenv LD_ASSUME_KERNEL
      2.2.5
      $

      First I set LD_ASSUME_KERNEL pretending I had RPM on a Linux 2.6 system. Then I wrote and executed a script. The script unset LD_ASSUME_KERNEL so that ut2003 would start working (but rpm would not). However, even though I did not redefine LD_ASSUME_KERNEL at the bottom of the script, the shell from which I called the script still kept the old 2.2.5 value. The script could have been a ut2003 startup script.

      One only needs to add the first "unset LD_ASSUME_KERNEL" line.

      --
      ==========
      There are two types of people: those who are in the world, and those who aren't.
    3. Re:Getting UT2003 working with kernel 2.6.0 by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Ah, yes, the forked shell is a new process and doesn't affect the parent, so only unset is needed for the new instance ... thanks for the verbosity. :)

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Getting UT2003 working with kernel 2.6.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey asswipe, why don't you fuck off or something?

  29. Poor use for Kazaa by Syncdata · · Score: 1

    Why don't more companies announce "Hey, we've thrown this up on Kazaa too!
    Because whenever you download an executable from Kazaa, it contains at least one, possibly two trojans. With file planet, you can at least insure that the files are not being tampered with.
    BitTorrent is an exception, because it hasn't taken off yet (lil billy teh h4xxor isn't using it)

    --
    "Inattention makes clowns of us all" -Bean
    1. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by randyest · · Score: 1

      Because whenever you download an executable from Kazaa, it contains at least one, possibly two trojans.

      Heavy exaggeration at best, complete lying FUD at worst. C'mon. Every one? Not in my experience.

      With file planet, you can at least insure that the files are not being tampered with.

      How's that? They don't give you any sort of MD5 or cksum. And they let 15-year-old sub-site admins upload files directly to their fileserver. And, of course, there have been many cases of viruses and trojans found in files on Fileplanet, just as with every other shareware/mirror/filedump site. [Hopefully funny grammar-pun: you can insure it all you want if you can get an agent to give you a quote for a no-virus-fileplanet-download policy, but you can't ensure or even be sure that a file you get from fileplanet is any safer than a file from anywhere else.]

      BitTorrent is an exception, because it hasn't taken off yet (lil billy teh h4xxor isn't using it)

      An exception to what? It's nothing like fileplanet, and very little like Kazaa. Do you mean an exception to having viruses or trojans in executables you might download using it? You do realize that bittorent doesn't check for viruses or trojans, right? See, whether or not a file you download (from anywhere) includes a trojan or virus depends on whether or not the source file was tainted to begin with. AFAIK, there is no "download stream interceptor" virus that adds a virus or trojan to an otherwise clean file as you download. I guess it's possible though, and I've just let that meme out into the wild, sigh . .

      So, in terms of virus protection, bittorent, kazaa, and fileplanet are equally useless -- you need a secure source file, without viruses. Note that you're more likely to find viruses when looking for illegal or fringe-legal files (the **AA like it that way) such as those you often find via Kazaa. You are less likely to find viruses when looking for legal files seeded by a known source, such as those you often find via bittorent.

      With fileplanet, you never really know. They do try to scan incoming files, but the definitions are a little dated. In any case, if I must use fileplanet, I always wait a while and check the file comments first. More often than viruses, I see incomplete/broken files (and again, no cksum available to check), or files followed by a replacement (updated/fixed) patch versions. You can download twice, or read about it in the comments first and download the final.

      Better, download it the fastest and easier way, but be sure to get a good checksum (MD5 or whatever) from the trusted original provider or one of the many "secure file" lists available on the internet, and compare it to the file you download. If it differs, the file is either trojaned or broken, thus deletable/redownloadable.

      --
      everything in moderation
    2. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      BitTorrent is an exception, because it hasn't taken off yet (lil billy teh h4xxor isn't using it)

      And if it ever does, it will be its death. It's already blocked where I go to school. BitTorrent has this nasty tendancy to completely and totally flood networks. And because of this, as it becomes more popular, more sites are going to block it to try and keep bandwidth available for other users.

      Try it on your home broadband link. As you hit higher and higher upload/download links, try and do anything else and notice that it appears ungodly slow. This is because BitTorrent is already saturating your network, and everything else has to fight with it to get an openning. On larger networks, the solution becomes simple: outright block it.

      Read my much longer rant about it in my journal. Basically, something needs to be done to prevent sites from just blocking it as a bandwidth hog. As it stands, using BitTorrent as the only distribution means will block a fair number of users.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    3. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by damiam · · Score: 1

      Most of the nonstandard bittorrent clients include support for bandwidth throttling. Hopefully, the official client will too in the near future.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    4. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      No idea what you're talking about. Months ago, I used the standard python release of BT and played with throttling it down to 1 k/s. Seems to work fine. Since then, BT has gotten even better at handling bandwidth.

      I honestly have no idea what you're complaining about, let alone even talking about.

      I noticed the replies to journal entry even point this out. You're not doing anything but spreading misinformation.

      --max_uploads
      the maximum number of uploads to allow at once.
      --upload_rate_fudge
      --max_upload_rate
      maximum kB/s to upload at, 0 means no limit (defaults
      --min_uploads
      the number of uploads to fill out to with extra

      So on and so on....

      All I know is that when I played with these options at 1k/s, I was watching sub-1k/s uploads and downloads.

      Nothing to see here...move along...

    5. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      The official client does and has for a long time already.

    6. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by Nucleon500 · · Score: 1
      Well, it isn't part of the GUI. Is there an rc file I can change to make this be the default? If not, I could always make a script.

      BTW, you can increase response times under heavy up- and downstream bandwidth load by playing around with QoS packet scheduling.

    7. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      Well, that's good for you. You can throttle your own bandwidth, so you don't flood your own connection. When I'm at school, there are some 2000 or so student computers connected to the network at any given time. (I think.) The reason BitTorrent was blocked is that no one was throttling their connection, either due to ignorance or greed.

      So, for a site that has a signfigant number of people using BitTorrent at once, something must be done to ensure every user gets Internet access: an increase in infrastructure to allow them to operate at full speed (not feasible in the least), some method of allowing the network infrastructure to enforce QoS so that BitTorrent connections have the lowest priority (my ultimate suggestion with a transparent proxy as the implementation), or to flat out block it (easiest).

      If BitTorrent gets used by more and more users, guess what the solution will be. I'll give you a hint: it'll be the cheapest, easiest solution that satisfies the most customers. In other words, block it.

      So while you can throttle your BitTorrent usage locally, something needs to be done to make sure that everybody throttles their connection so that every user gets network service.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    8. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by shird · · Score: 1

      Another problem with BT is it doesn't work through egress firewalls which allow outgoing for the proxy only, and the proxy is configured for port 80 only. This is a very common setup because it is good practice security wise where all that is meant to be allowed is web browsing. For this reason, BT should never be used as the only distribution method when you want people who can only 'browse the net' to be allowed to download.

      --
      I.O.U One Sig.
    9. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by MegaFur · · Score: 1

      You are aware that the KaZaA download could be initiated from a link on a (relatively) secure website right? When you do it this way, KaZaA will be searching for a specific file ID, thus lessening the chance of getting an illegitimate file with all the nasty wormy, buggy, trojany, virusy things.

      --
      Furry cows moo and decompress.
    10. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by Uerige · · Score: 1

      I really don't know why, but I've got the impression that you have never ever used a filesharing program. Except for kazaa, probably. The publisher would put an ed2k: or torrent link on a website, and the file on the network. There is no way that the file downloaded by this method gets corrupted, because it is checked with the checksum when the download is finshed.
      You're a troll.

    11. Re:Poor use for Kazaa by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I certainly can't ignore such comments. They certainly seem valid to me. Just the same, does your school plan on blocking http and ftp protocols too? What about scp? Do they throttle them? They are all open to abuse. A possible double standand because they have a caching http/ftp proxy?

      My point being, ya, it would be nice to have something on the front end to address your plea, but at the same time, people need to be responsible for their impact on a network. A network abuser is a network abuser. Do keep in mind that the standard python client is a reference implemenation, so I wouldn't expect such features to make it there. Just the same, have you contact the author to see how he feels about it? Perhaps he could be talked into asking a couple of questions during installation, like, size of pipe and is it shared? That way, he could automatically create some defaults which are more sane for a shared network. Granted, that still leaves the door open for abuse, just the same, at least you would know it was more than likely abuse rather than someone being ignorant.

      One last comment, I do think you have a valid comment which the author may want to hear about. That is, I think you should mention locality preference. If you have multiple files available from the local network, they should float to the top rather than having everything pull from remote networks. Seems logical and valid! If peers are available on the same class a, b, or c network, seems more than logical that those peers should be tapped first.

  30. Stalin vs Hitler by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    as seen here: Stalin vs. Hitler The Authorized Annotated Translation, a Russian comic, but annotations in English. Done in something approaching a Marvel Comics style.

    Artful, actually. But strange to someone with a usa viewpoint.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  31. But WW2 is big! (Re:Uhmm right..) by ThreeFarthingStone · · Score: 1

    Not only did my country, the USA, invade France and get bombed at Hawaii, but as part of a coalition they entered North Africa and Italy and attacked Japanese-held islands. But there are plenty of games about the USA fighting WW2, even though there was no fighting on the US mainland and much fighting did not involve US forces.

    I've never tried "Red Orchestra", but if it really is a game about the eastern European front, then it is a game about one of the most important but overlooked parts of WW2. The "Great Patriotic War" was fought between Germany and the USSR. Germany had captured many states, several entire Soviet Socialist Republics, and had its front line deep to the east in the Russian SSR. But Russia was too big, allowing the Soviets to gain strength with aid from certain other countries. The city of Stalingrad saw urban war. The German army could not hold that Russian town and also defend Tunisia (in Northern Africa near Italy), and lost both. Then the Soviets advanced west and some other troops went north into Italy.

    Of the southern and eastern fronts, the eastern saw more action, if action is measured by the amount of land taken. It was the Red Army that took Berlin, the German capital. The Soviets won the Great Patriotic War, though they would also see action in eastern Asia.

    In Asia was another of the great overlooked fronts, the War of Resistance Against Japan, fought by the Chinese Guomintang/Kuomintang (depending on which desktop environment you prefer) and the Chinese Communists against Japan. Could this be the sequel to "Red Orchestra"? Or what if someone plays "Red Orchestra" as Germany and captures all Siberia (eastern Russia)?

    --
    ==========
    There are two types of people: those who are in the world, and those who aren't.
  32. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by ThreeFarthingStone · · Score: 1

    Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads

    Make sure you check your filesystems so you don't lose that huge file you just downloaded! (I know it is a bad joke because fsck starts with a lowercase f. If "mebi" was not hyperlinked I would be very confused now.)

    --
    ==========
    There are two types of people: those who are in the world, and those who aren't.
  33. Right by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1
    Real weapons. Real battles. Real soldiers.'
    Oooh ooh, does this mean we get real sieges, real starvation, real civilian casualties, and real soldiersicles too?

    The soviet front was horifically bloody in not-your-typical-war ways... the fighting was not the part you learn about in history class :-/
    1. Re:Right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, just real moral posturing.

    2. Re:Right by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      I think "acceptable losses" and "collateral damage" would be a cool addition to a WWII game.

      Like... Atomic USA: A fantasic game in which you lay nuclear waste to cities populated by women, children, and the elderly then spend the next few decades justifying this crime against humanity by saying, "More would have died during an invasion," while failing to mention that Japan had already surrendered.

      SS: The Final Solution: A political strategy game in which you make deals with other high ranking German officers about how to best "evacuate" Jews from German culture.

      In Soviet Russia your allies shoot YOU! Every once an a while you spawn as the guy who sits in the back with the machine gun and mows down his own men when the retreat because they're scared to death charging the German army because... There's not enough guns for everyone! Pick up your friend's!

      Kamakazi: The Adventure. A flight simulator in which you fly your plane for a few hours and once the action starts up you fly head first into the nearest ship. The game will only load one time, so make it count!

      I can't think of one for Britain except like: Jolly Good German Fodder! Cheers and thanks for all the Panzers or something.

      I like the comments about simulated sitting around and freezing too.

      I love WWII games, particularlly Blitzkreig (?) and Day of Defeat. However, don't try and sell these things as "real." They're not even close. They're fun! Real war is not "fun." None of the above game titles would really be... fun. I mean, if you're sick maybe...

      Real war is fucking horrific. However, something a lot of people that get all worked up here and say, "Oh it's making a joke out of war, whah, whah, whah..." forget is that this is how humans deal with horror.

  34. Symbols of the enemy. by Moose-Alini · · Score: 1

    Something that has really been bothering me lately. I don't know about this mod, but in games and movies lately, there seems to be an obvious lack of Nazis. In games like Battlefield 1942, movies like Enemies at the Gate, and the Pianist, just to name a few, the Nazi foe has been reduced to nothing but German. You won't find them referred to as Nazis, or see a single swastika. In the Wolfenstein games, and older movies, you cant go two feet without seeing that broken cross, but now they opt for the Teutonic knights symbols, and the Falcon, avoiding labeling the German menace as Nazi's at all. In Battlefield 1942, they do the same with the symbol of the rising sun. Come to think of it, in my high-school history classes, when learning about world war two, I cant recall Nazi ever being said, and the death/labor camps only being mentioned in passing. No matter how offensive it is, it did happen, and we can't just forget it and act like Nazis never existed.

    1. Re:Symbols of the enemy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame German law. Distribution of games containing symbols of illegal organisations is a crime in Germany. That's why many publishers opt not to include swastikas in the first place.

    2. Re:Symbols of the enemy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's happening there is that whenever overt Nazi symbolism is used in a commercial product, the question of profiteering comes into play.

      This is certainly true of games. Doom, for example, contained a swastika in one of its floorplans, and id wound up releasing a patch to remove it in response to an outcry by some very emotional people about it.

      You may argue that that's silly and overreacting, but consider what position you would take if it were your product and you were fielding a complaint from an actual Auschwitz survivor, or a whole group representing them and their interests. I don't know about you, but I'd remove the damned symbolism long before I dug myself into some sort of philosophical artistic freedom position, which isn't always tenable with a commercial product.

      Now if it were a work of art containing the symbolism, and removing it would fundamentally alter its primary essence, then the situation would be quite different. Games don't qualify. Yes, they have artistic merit, but their purpose is to make money and entertain.

      I agree with you about the history. U.S. history in public schools doesn't do a very good job of revealing the historical reasons for and repercussions of war to new generations, with consequences that should currently be fairly obvious to all.

    3. Re:Symbols of the enemy. by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because they depict the Wehrmacht, who were simply the German army, not Nazi troops like the S.S. Fact is, the Wehrmacht spent most of its time out doing what armies do, fighting. The lion share of the Nazi atrocities were commited by the S.S. Also, another reason not to have swastikas all over the German textures is that the infantry didn't have swastikas plastered all over them. Sure a small one here or there, but the Iron Cross, for example was a far more common symbol.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  35. LAUGH MY FUCKIN ASS OFF!!! by TyrranzzX · · Score: 1

    The first public edition of the long awaited Red Orchestra mod for Unreal Tournament 2003 has been released. 'Red Orchestra brings you in-depth infantry combat on the Eastern Front of WWII. With the emphasis on realism and authenticity; Germains being the well equiped nazi's they are, and the soviets being equiped to fight with sticks and dig trenches with their bare hands. The Soviet Red Army meets the German Army on the ground across battlefields from Kiev through Stalingrad and on to the Reichstag in Berlin. Real battles. Real soldiers. Real Sticks

  36. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can think of a few demos that are over a gig in size. Anarchy Online: Shadowlands, Sims Online. 200 megs is pretty small for a game demo these days...

  37. Bit Torrent download link by AIX-Hood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a bit torrent download link for this at Filerush.com: Red Orchestra Beta 1 BT link

    1. Re:Bit Torrent download link by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

      Hooray! Please mod this up! Thanx!

    2. Re:Bit Torrent download link by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

      Uh, oh. This is the .zip version - anyone have the .tar.gz Linux installer torrent-ed?

    3. Re:Bit Torrent download link by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      I've downloaded it from FilePlant and ModPortal (XtremeGN is down) and both those gzips are corrupted. If somebody finds an uncorrupted gzip of it please post.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
  38. Here's a bit torrent for it: by AIX-Hood · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a bit torrent download link for this at Filerush.com: Red Orchestra Beta 1 BT link

  39. MOD UP by aSiTiC · · Score: 1

    finally a torrent link mod up....

  40. Will this work on the ut2003 demo? by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 1

    So, will it? I'm already downloading the torrent, but I figured the answer might help others decide if it's worth the bandwidth...

  41. Thanks, but no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll stick to Call of Duty demos.

  42. Bravo, Mithrandur by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    You took the words right out of my mouth.

    It's a pity to see war celebrated in this manner. Let those who exalt such stuff pray war never sweeps away their homes and/or loved ones.

  43. WWII genre games overblown? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    Personally, yes, I tend to agree with you. But I also realize I'm one of those people who got sick and tired of all the wargame strategy simulations in the late 80's and early 90's. (Remember when it seems like TSR and others released one of these things every month or so?)

    There's obviously a BIG market for re-enacting/simulating real wars, and WWII in particular. (Probably because it had the most interesting variety of weapons used in it?)

    FPS games have also divided themselves into 2 different factions: those demanding realism, and those demanding fast action and "if it moves, shoot it!" gameplay.

    I find the whole FPS genre to be best for "mindless killing", myself. Any FPS that makes me use a lot of strategy quickly gets more "tedious" than fun to me, and I quit playing it. (EG. Theif and Theif 2, where stealth was more important than shooting.) Therefore, I like futuristic weapons with gratifying special effects, and lots of fast action.

    I can understand the interest in the other type (EG. Counterstrike fanatics, who love the "once you're dead, you're out of the game" realism and realistic weapons with very limited ammo.) too. Different people want different things is all.

  44. FRIST POST!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, Slashdot Anals or Orals YOU!

  45. There are no good guys anymore... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    I guess they're trying to change up the ol' Allies vs. Axis standard by not including an American European force, but really.... Now you can play for one mass murder or the other mass murderer! Whoo hoo! I guess this sorta falls in line with promoting those Anakin Skywalker coloring books... You know, the kid that grows up to be the mass murdering second in command? I just love what we're teaching our kids ^__^

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:There are no good guys anymore... by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      You seem to be implying that the US didn't have camps of it's own in WW II.

      Honestly though, growing up in the US as I have, and trying to find out what really happened in the past is becoming harder and harder. I'm beginning to think that a 1984-esque situation is happening. "Oh sure, those Nazi death camps happened, but what we're really concerned with was the fact that the US pulled together in a time of trouble, like we should be now...the Nazi's were Terrorists too..." bah.

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    2. Re:There are no good guys anymore... by binary+paladin · · Score: 1

      And playing as America isn't playing as a country run by a mass murderer?

      I mean... we nuked Japan but hey... they don't count. They're just, you know... Japs.

      It's actually really disturbing. I was in a veteran's museum not too long ago and I was reading some of the archived newspapers. The Germans were always the Germans. The newspapers didn't use the term "kraut" or anything like that.

      But the Japanese? Nope. They were "The Japs."

      About the only war that's anything more than a bunch of tyrants using pawns to butcher one another is a revolution and that's limitted in and of itself. There was no "good guy" in WWII.

    3. Re:There are no good guys anymore... by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

      "...trying to find out what really happened in the past is becoming harder and harder."

      Well when you DO get a CLUE come back and then we'll talk, because during World War 2 the United States didn't mass murder a several million of it's own people (Stalin). The United States didn't sentance a few million people to death in concentration camps (Hitler). Yes, the japanese camps were shitty, I'll be the first to agree, but they were TEMPORARY. Nor was their goal to exterminate large portions of the populace or political disidents. If you think otherwise with your "clouded history", you must have missed the last 50 years and the LARGE ASIAN POPULACE thriving in the US.

      You are an absolute DUMBASS if you can honestly even attempt to compare the camps of Hitler and Stalin to those of WWII US, or even today.

      Cripes that was so damn predictable it was scary...

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    4. Re:There are no good guys anymore... by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      You know, you're right. I mean, the us would never detain people without trial under "suspision" of doing something would they? We wouldn't just toss the Geneva Conventions out the window like some common dictator would we? Oh, wait... those conventions don't apply to people designated "enemy combatants", and we do have this ongoing "WAR ON TERRORISIM", what was I thinking? You're right, guess I just don't have a clue, sorry.
      Mod me flamebait, I'm sick of people mouthing off that this country is the best in the world. I will admit that this country is great, but it could be SO much better. Things are being set into motion that I feel are going to make the US more a police state than a "Land of Opportunity". Another /.'er said it best : "The cure for 1984 is 1776"

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
  46. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    No, there isn't more efficient ways.

    Games are getting larger: Textures, maps, skins, models, animations, physics, everything. They are growing bigger and bigger, and expect them to only accelerate in size. If you want a game to look better and have more feature, you can expect it to take more room on your hard disk.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  47. Why bother? We know who *WON* this fight.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >With the emphasis on realism and authenticity, the Soviet Red
    >Army meets the German Army on the ground across battlefields from
    >Kiev through Stalingrad and on to the Reichstag in Berlin. Real
    >weapons. Real battles. Real soldiers.' Download from FilePlanet (free
    >reg. req.), FasterFiles, more."
    >
    >
    The Red Army. They kicked German Butt Real Good with a little help from Mother Nature. Quit playing these *LAME-ASSED FPS SHOOTERS* and read a fucking *HISTORY BOOK*

  48. *add* an Alterted State of Consciousness by MegaFur · · Score: 1
    In order to add, it would first have to meet, then somehow exceed the current offerings.
    That sentence makes no sense at all. I guess it's just a weird reach for some clever rhetorical hook.

    Yeah it is. It does sort of make sense, but first you have to stand on your head for a while so all the blood rushes to it... then turn over really fast and exhale as rapidly as possible. If you do it right, then just before you pass out, it will begin to make sense. When you later regain consciousness, it won't anymore. Ben Kenobi would understand.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  49. Re:Too many "realistic" fps games? by PjotrP · · Score: 1
    Today it's really amazing how the whole FPS world has gone for this whole "realism" thing. As a quake3 player i find the realism thing very overrated and i find it amazing that after quake3 no solid follow up has been made.

    What I, and many quake3 players with me, need is a solid new game engine that is geared towards a serious multiplayer environment. I find all the recent realism games lacking any real DM skills. With fear of sounding like a total q3 fanboy some points of the q3 engine makes it more suited for brute skill (as opposed to the skill of strategy and communication which are to be found in the faster moving game of q3 as well).

    1- strafejumping makes the actual movement something which takes skill. even after playing quake3 for years with a clan my strafejumping skills still dont come near the movement skills of some of the top players. it just adds another element of skill to the game.

    2- aim. realism ruins this element of the game by actually adding code to introduce an element of luck to actually hitting people. Also the slow speed of the game makes hitting people much easier. And finally the gamecode which in turn makes people stop, crouch down and then hit fire might be more "realistic" but it also makes for even less moving targets and of course aiming at somebody when you're not moving yourself is much easier.

    3. i miss the hitsound :)

    with doom3, half life 2 and quake4 (according to an interview at quakecon done by gamespy) all being focused on the single player game, there really is no game out on the horizon which i can consider an heir to the quake3 throne.

    will some game company please just step up and make a worthy follow up to osp q3?

    --
    PjotrP
  50. Maybe this is News for Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because you can play this on Linux?

  51. how about the Iliad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always thought it would be cool to have a really well done game based on Homer's Iliad. There is certainly enough violence in that epic to make it fit right in with the deathmatch crowd. As for weapons, there would need to be swords, spears, archery, and throwing of boulders, as well as the ability to ride in chariots.

  52. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1


    With folks like you who bitch about everything, game developers are damned if they do, damned if they don't.

    I'm sorry to say, but 3 levels of a game, plus engine, plus textures, plus audio is a few hundred megs. Check your disk usage after installing, I am sure those textures were compressed really well, it's probably around 700MB, right?

    Should they have made the download 500MB and included 4 maps?

    I think the 100MB limit is hogwash. I would rather wait 45 minutes to play a true technical demonstration of a game than an incomplete, unrealistic demo that took 10 minutes to download.

    Perhaps you should just give up your broadband since you whine when you actually need to use it. Nancy boy.

  53. Realism??? by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

    With the emphasis on realism and authenticity, the Soviet Red Army meets the German Army on the ground across battlefields from Kiev through Stalingrad and on to the Reichstag in Berlin. Real weapons. Real battles. Real soldiers

    Realistic? How is this realistic at all? That is, unless our grandfathers fought WW2 with a mouse and keyboard.

    The use of 'realism' and 'real' is bothersome. I remember hearing countless times during a counter-strike match about how 'realistic' the game was. This was usually a comment made by a 14 year old who had never fired an AK47, or been shot at in real life. Not to mention get shot 4 times and still remain focused enough to run around, bunny hop a corner, take down 4 people with an MP5, then save the hostages.

    These games may be exciting, battles of avatars dressed up in WW2 or modern military skins, but they are far from a simulation of anything real.

    These are the words spoken by an avid FPS gamer since wolf3d. Just so you know I'm not bashing. Though, this mod deserves some bashing for getting posted on /. while Desert Combat for BF1942 was ignored. No vehicles? Even Counter-Strike had those on some maps. BF1942, by far, is the best combat game engine out now, IMO. That EA vehicle code really makes a difference.

  54. Re:Is it real? Or is it unreal? by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1
    i would say it could be a very good thing!

    I can't think of a better way to learn about how something happened than to actually live through it (well, play through it..) Put a bit more emphasis on the tactical and planning side and it's a good teaching aid.

    Of course these materials would have to be specifically designed for schools/kids etc. and be accurate, but it would make me interested in history.

    For example, the BBC is currently running a program where a team commands a battle (usually romans vs. someone) within a computer game. I think their opponent is controlled by a human, but even using game engines as a way of re-enacting battles in a non-interactive (or semi-interactive) way might be useful, certainly better that film (view from any angle, zoom in/out, follow one cohort etc)

    i don't know how much "battle history" there is in school at the moment, but it would have certainly made history more interesting for me. (maybe it would sway me to choose to study it at 16 rather than map colouring, which was the other option)

  55. WOW by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Realism and Unreal Tournament - those are words you rarely hear in the same sentence!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  56. Modding required... by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 0


    Why aren't both the parent and the grandparent modded up already? They deserve it.

  57. Obligatory NP, hot grits, and... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    Imagine a beowolf cluster of Gay Hot Natlie Portman Grits poured down your pants.....

    Mmmmmm, Slashdot....

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  58. Sounds like where I USED to work.... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    ... especially the part about waiting in the cold, hoping to die.

    Nobody wants a game where we use 'realistic' muskets; we want autoloading RPGs and instant-shot railguns, and fuck anyone who gets in there with us.

    WWII was a bitch, yeah, but I don't feel guilty about it, because, I didn't kill any jews, russians, or anybody else, for that matter. And I don't owe them any guilt, either.

    Want people to respect jews? Don't be an asshole. It's that easy.

    These are games. Get over it. If I want to spend my time off chasing my friends across some terrain with an RPG, saying "Stand still! This will only hurt for a minute!!!" , then, by god, I will.

    All your bitching makes me want to do is puke, because you represent the part of humanity that would be fixed by evolution, IF we would stop protecting it.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  59. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Kyouryuu · · Score: 1
    200 megs is nothing when you think about all that has to go into a demo and the points you highlight fail to appreciate this.

    As any level builder can attest to, some of the largest components of a level pack are the textures and sounds. The Unreal Tournament engine can handle extremely detailed textures, most 1024x1024 in size, in a fairly uncompressed format. Moreover, all of the sounds are also generally uncompressed wave files. You couple those two things together and you end up with a lot of "bloat." However, performance is improved since the game doesn't have to work at uncompressing a dozen files at runtime. I'd hate to waltz through a world of overcompressed JPEGs, know what I mean?

  60. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by naztafari · · Score: 1

    I'm on dial-up, you insensitive clod!

  61. *thwap!* by sbeast702 · · Score: 0

    *slaps forehead* this is probably the worst thing they could have done with the game... i'm a fan of the 2k3 engine and all, but i'm getting just about sick and tired of WW type shooters

  62. LINUX installer file .gz file corrupted by Danathar · · Score: 1

    For those of you wondering about using it with the LINUX version of UT2003. Of the three mirrors that the site page has listed, fileplanet and the other one have a corrupted .gz file that that dies when decompressing with an unexpected EOF error. The offical site has taken the LINUX client off of their ftp server. So it looks for now that there is'nt a version ready for the LINUX version of UT2003.

  63. Graphics, but so what? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    So this mod has pretty graphics thanks to the UT engine. BF1942 isn't that bad at all in terms of graphics. However, the big deal here is that right now I think the majority of gamers aren't AS concerned about graphics as they used to be. Everything looks really damn pretty. What they WANT however is some new and exciting gameplay, cuz everything seems to be clones. Thats why its important to make a mod thats DIFFERENT than other things. For example, the Pirates mod for bf1942. Jesus, if that's not one of the most creative things I've ever seen I don't know what is.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  64. Why an executable to run? by sixb0nes · · Score: 1

    This is the first full mod I've downloaded for UT2K3 (due to the lack of high-quality attemps). I'm a little curious why they use an .exe to front the game? Is this a normal UScript/Package concept when the menuing structure changes? If so, must they use UCC to compile this .exe or are they simply using it like a batch file to throw cmdline options on? Thanks.

  65. Re:Off-Topic Rant: Fscking Huge Downloads by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 1

    You'll be Okay. I'll sell you a DVD+R with all the latest demos and popular shareware applications for $19.99 + 6.95 s&h. That'll save you weeks of downloading!