Slashdot Mirror


New Hitchhiker's Guide Radio Series Announced

AllieA writes "The BBC has announced that they will be adapting the final three Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy books for radio, with this 'tertiary phase' including Life, the Universe, and Everything; So Long and Thanks for All the Fish; and Mostly Harmless. Members of the original radio series cast, including Simon Jones, Geoffrey McGivern, Mark Wing-Davey, Susan Sheridan, Stephen Moore and announcer John Marsh, will all take part in the new series, set to start next spring and be completed before the end of 2004."

182 comments

  1. Finally.... by Ratface · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A reason to listen to "normal" radio again!

    I tend to listen only to Internet radio stations where I can steer the type of programming I listen to. There is all too little original programming on broadcast radio that makes it worthwhile - and waaay too much commercialised pop rubbish.

    Think about it - when was the last time you actually *looked forward* to something on the radio? And when was the lst time on TV?

    Right!

    --

    A little planning goes a long way...
    1. Re:Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work for the BBC and am therefore posting anonymously. While this was not done on purpose, it was by a sole television executive, and not a decision by the BBC. That television executive has since been let go.

    2. Re:Finally.... by ronaldyang · · Score: 0

      This sounds worse than Dr. Who after Tom Baker!!!

    3. Re:Finally.... by rf0 · · Score: 1

      Well last time I desperatly wanted to listen to the raido was in about 2000 when there was a live concert by my favourite band of the time. The only time recently on tv where there were repeats of Gamesmaster but that was just for the retro kick. Oh and last night when my favourite Simpsons episode was on, The Last Temptation of Homer

      But generally it takes something special to peak my intrest

      Rus

    4. Re:Finally.... by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      You leave Davidson and McCoy alone!

      You can, however, kick the shit out of Baker (Colin) and that McGann boy all you want.:)

      Best Dr. was Pertwee anyway:)

    5. Re:Finally.... by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 3, Informative

      I listen to radio everyday. In the morning I listen to the Today programme whilst driving in to work. In the evening on the way home from work I'll listen to PM or the world at six. I look forward to the The Now Show or Just a minute. Then quite often I listen to BBC 7 which is a sort of Radio 4 Gold.

      As for TV, I must get my dose of Dr Who, CSI and SG-1.

    6. Re:Finally.... by KDan · · Score: 2, Funny

      With the complete H2G2 read by Douglas Adams himself available, why bother listening to a BBC version? He reads it very well indeed, has a good voice, and for obvious reasons cares about the story enough to render it in a good and entertaining way.

      mod -1, redundant - for the bbc version!

      Daniel

      --
      Carpe Diem
    7. Re:Finally.... by Kanon · · Score: 1

      The first 2 books as done by BBC radio were funny, very well acted and very well put together. Much , much better than just listening to someone read the book (And the radio shows are different anyway)

      Have you ever listened to the radio show?

    8. Re:Finally.... by ayjay29 · · Score: 1


      The BBC have all their radio stations available with Real Audio feeds here.

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    9. Re:Finally.... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a Radio 4 head too, but you forgot:

      a) The News Quiz
      b) I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue
      c) In Business
      d) Material World
      d) From Our Own Correspondent
      e) Et al!

      Radio 4 is the best radio station yet conceived, it's really only Woman's Hour, You and Yours and The Archers that are holding it back!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:Finally.... by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      Think about it - when was the last time you actually *looked forward* to something on the radio? And when was the lst time on TV?

      That's why I run an icecast station - if I want to hear it, it goes on the 'radio'.

      More seriously, though, there is the odd radio program worth hearing. I try to catch Ideas on a regular basis. There's also stuff like Public Radio that'll often air interesting stuff.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    11. Re:Finally.... by holy+zarquon's+singi · · Score: 1

      Don't diss the Archers. An every day tale of farming folk. Dead Ringers is great too, I just loved Dr Who (Tom Baker undergoing transformation into Ozzy Osbourne).

      --
      "...we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that." B.Spears 2003
    12. Re:Finally.... by Bill_Mische · · Score: 1

      Remember the first two books were novelisations of the radio series even though they were different in many places. For example the first book ends at the point that Douglas Adams had got to when the courier arrived for the manuscript.

      --
      Boring Old Fart (40, married, 3 kids...er no...make that 49, married, 3 grown up kids...it's been a long time)
    13. Re:Finally.... by OP_Boot · · Score: 1

      when was the last time you actually *looked forward* to something on the radio? When the interview/requiem for DNA was on... so about 2 years ago

    14. Re:Finally.... by DataCannibal · · Score: 1

      Most evenings of the week I look forward to listening to Radio3 , expecially Late Junction and Andy Kershaw's world music show.

      On TV I look forward to live football especially when the toon (Newcastle United) are playing, "Taggart" and "Have I got News for You"

      --
      No but, yeah but, no but...
    15. Re:Finally.... by angusr · · Score: 1
      Although, of course, you could listen to non-normal radio and get a tremendous fix of HitchHiker's Guide, The Goon Show, I'm Sorry I Haven't a Clue, Just a Minute, Earthsearch, Sherlock Holmes and a whole host of other comedy and drama radio shows on BBC7 (DAB, Freeview, Cable, Satellite and Internet)

      Radio 4, where the new series will be transmitted, is also streamed and quite a lot of recent stuff is also available for a while after transmission (depending on rights). I have a TiVo connected to an old Freeview box dedicated to picking up stuff from BBC7 and Radio 4...

    16. Re:Finally.... by Tanaka · · Score: 1

      Shame thay quit the Ogg Vorbis trials. Thay sounded far far better.

    17. Re:Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dead Ringers is the ultimate reason to own a radio. The TV series isn't bad either.

    18. Re:Finally.... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      "The Archers" is as much an 'everyday tale of farming folk' as "Eastenders" is an everyday tale of East End folk.

      It simply isn't entertaining - I actually LOOK FORWARD to "Front Row"!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    19. Re:Finally.... by sydb · · Score: 1

      In general I agree, but I find the News Quiz a little lame. Quote Unquote is another disaster area.

      Has anyone mentioned Home Truths? Used to be fantastic before John Peel left.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    20. Re:Finally.... by Greyhand · · Score: 1

      1. Adapt Hitchhikers for radio 2. Broadcast it 3. ???? 4. FISH!!!!!

    21. Re:Finally.... by Dave+Clifton · · Score: 1

      Home Truths is great but I thought John Peel was only on holiday.

    22. Re:Finally.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      when was the last time you actually *looked forward* to something on the radio?

      CBC Radio's As It Happens weeknights at 6:30PM EST.

    23. Re:Finally.... by Phillip2 · · Score: 1

      John Peel is only on holiday. Besides I think
      David Stafford has his moments.

    24. Re:Finally.... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Also don't forget the long-running Alistair Cook's "Letter From America". Or "Dead Ringers" (although not everyone finds it funny, several episodes of Dead Ringers have had me in uncontrollable fits of laughter).

      I don't have a TV right now (because I've got a major money crisis on at the moment). With decent radio stations, I don't miss it a bit.

      As for the Archers? Well, there was a fight scene on it last week. Hearing the fight on the radio painted a far more vivid picture than watching one on TV!

    25. Re:Finally.... by sydb · · Score: 2, Funny

      As no-one else has asked, may I have your hand in marriage?

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    26. Re:Finally.... by TomV · · Score: 1

      ...and the continuity knots between the end of the second radio series and the start of the third book will be a nightmare unless the beeb decides to simply ignore them (probably for the best). Let's see - are Arthur and Ford stuck on prehistoric Earth with the Golgafrinchans (book) or is Arthur on the Heart of Gold and Ford, with Zaphod, walking away from a largely unsatisfactory visit to the Ruler of The Galaxy and what it pleases him to think of as his cat (radio)? Will there ever be a supply of small, lemon-soaked paper napkins, for your comfort and convenience?

    27. Re:Finally.... by InOverMyFeet · · Score: 0
      "Think about it - when was the last time you actually *looked forward* to something on the radio?"

      Car Talk.....every Saturday morning!

      --

      -- Probability does not dismiss possibility --

    28. Re:Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget "Any Questions" which is fantastic due to "Any Answers", you listen to AQ trying to imagine the type of person who is going to ring in about the subjects discussed, then imagine how annoyed you're going to get when they do.

      You know the sort of thing... "I'd just like to say that I disagree with everyone on the pannel and all should be banned/sent home etc"

      It's really annoying but in a good way, because you can feel superior.

    29. Re:Finally.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I regularly look forward to Saturday's "Home Truths" on BBC Radio 4, and come to think of it life without the "Today" program on the same station would much less interesting. It may be an aquired taste.

    30. Re:Finally.... by sydb · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! I am not alone!

      Remember Tony Martin, the farmer who sat at the bottom of his staircase, in the dark with a rifle, and shot two innocent young lads who broke into his house? This is the kind of issue that divides a country in two, and is rocket fuel for Any Answers. I love Any Answers.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    31. Re:Finally.... by plugger · · Score: 1

      Here is a little titbit from last year about the department who provided those streams:

      http://www.ntk.net/index.cgi?b=02002-06-14&l=5 0#l

    32. Re:Finally.... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Grrrr...

      Peel is great, but there's to little David Stafford on radio. And as others have pointed out, he'll be back off holiday soon, so don't worry.

      Don't forget that Radio 4 also gave us Goodness Gracious Me, The League of Gentlemen (filmed just next door to me in Hayfield) and myriad other little gems.

      And Quote Unquote has its moments - it's just a bit posh for most of us.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    33. Re:Finally.... by babbage · · Score: 1
      Think about it - when was the last time you actually *looked forward* to something on the radio?

      Every. Damn. Week. So many of This American Life's shows have just been completely superb, it's by far my favorite running show of any genre or any medium. Funny. Sad. Uplifting. Depressing. Unforgettable.

      Car Talk is great too, but the main emotional appeal there is "side-splittingly funny". Not that there's anything wrong with that, but TAL can do that when they feel like it, and they branch off in lots of other directions too. (They do get points for the very useful website though -- need to find a reputable mechanic in your area?). (Wait Wait Don't Tell Me is also very funny, but smug -- sometimes charmingly, sometimes smarmily -- and with humor that will mostly go stale in well under a week. Still worth listening to though.)

      So there's good stuff on the radio -- just not on the commercial stations. And I don't know of any show anywhere that's even half as impressive as TAL has more or less consistently been for the past seven years or so.

      And when was the lst time on TV?

      ...okay, you've got me there. Is anything on PBS as good as the stuff NPR/PRI has been doing? There's NOVA, and "Masterpiece Theatre", and lots of kids shows, but beyond that I'm not aware of what they're offering, and none of it wins me over the way TAL has.

  2. Peter Jones... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Without Peter Jones as "The Book" I'm not sure how I feel about this.

    Also, it's important to point out that there were many differences between the books, the scripts, and the television production.

    Adoption of the remaining three books to Radio by anyone other than DNA himself is something I don't believe will work.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    1. Re:Peter Jones... by p.gogarty · · Score: 1

      I would be happy with Norman Lovett instead.

      --
      Paul Gogarty
    2. Re:Peter Jones... by ItWorkedLastTime · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here are the 25th anniversary radio scripts. Very good. Very funny.

    3. Re:Peter Jones... by floydigus · · Score: 1

      Lame nay-saying whinging.

      Peter Jones was brilliiant, granted, but there was nothing about his style or voice that made him inherently better for the role than dozens of other actors.

      [as a nerdy aside, the guide would probably be written in XML, so could be rendered using XSLT in any medium, written or spoken and in any font or voice]

      On the topic of DNA being the best man for the job to do the adaptation - well of course he would be. Tolkein would have been my choice to do the screenplay for the LOTR trilogy (and I would've chosen an English director >:| ), but the films are brilliant even without the great man's involvement.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    4. Re:Peter Jones... by TenPin22 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, without Peter Jones its just not hhgttg.

    5. Re:Peter Jones... by TomV · · Score: 1

      Peter Jones was brilliiant, granted, but there was nothing about his style or voice that made him inherently better for the role than dozens of other actors.

      <cheeky>except for the long auditioning process which eventually failed to find someone with a sufficiently 'Peter Jones-y' voice, as DNa put it, so Adams and Lloyd hired Peter Jones, of course ;-) </cheeky>

    6. Re:Peter Jones... by angusr · · Score: 5, Informative
      Sorry, can't agree. Remember that all the way through casting the original series Douglas Adams and the other people involved always said that they were looking for a "you know, a Peter Jones-y sort of voice." Eventually someone pointed out that they could achieve that by casting Peter Jones.

      What DNA was after was a slight air of befuddled incomprehension but total authority, a sort of "I have no idea why this might be the case - but it most certainly is the case" state of mind. If you've heard Peter Jones on "Just a Minute" you'll know why he was perfect for the role.

      I still reckon that the best replacement would have been Oliver Postgate... not only does he have that same befuddled air when narrating the Clangers (et al) but for at least two generations he's a voice you'd instinctively trust. If he said "Don't Panic", you wouldn't...

    7. Re:Peter Jones... by floydigus · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Again.

      I still think it can be done well with a new voice, though. I second Oliver Postgate.

      --

      All things in moderation; including moderation

    8. Re:Peter Jones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll tell you exactly who they need: Former CBC radio host Lister Sinclair. Listen to this old radio show and tell me I'm wrong.
      http://cbc.ca/ideas/real/01-11-21-ideas.ra m

    9. Re:Peter Jones... by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with Oliver Postgate (by name, at least). How about Peter Sallis, best known for being Wallace in Wallace and Grommit?

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
    10. Re:Peter Jones... by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      Please - not Oliver Postgate!

      I'm from the Noggin the Nog generation, and can't think of anything else when I hear Postgate's voice.

      BBC's 'Correspondent' had a report from Africa by a reporter that had a Postgate-ish voice, and I couldn't listen to the report for laughing.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  3. Will it do the books justice? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm fully aware that the guide started as a radio series in the first place... But I'm still not sure that radio, nor film, can do the books justice. The surreal whimsical quality is just very hard to convey.

    For those who have seen the utterly horrible adaptation of Michael Ende's A Neverending Story, read the book. Really, you should.

    I guess I'm just getting old and cynical or something, but I'm still quite sceptical they'll pull it off.

    --
    .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    1. Re:Will it do the books justice? by WegianWarrior · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they take the cue from how the first radioseries turned into books, they probaly chop things up, rewrite the plot, rewrite dialoge, have people act the same way for different reasons (which saves rewriting the dialog) and genraly simply tell the same story ina different way.



      Will it do the books justice? Maybe not, but I think it still might be good. The movies don't do much justice to The Lord of the Rings (I found LotR:TT to do more injustice than justice to the book) but they are still worth seeing, ain't they?

      --
      Everything in the world is controlled by a small, evil group to which, unfortunately, no one you know belongs.
    2. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Will it do the books justice? Maybe not, but I think it still might be good. The movies don't do much justice to The Lord of the Rings (I found LotR:TT to do more injustice than justice to the book) but they are still worth seeing, ain't they?

      You make a good point, although I would argue that the LotR movies do the books justice to a much greater degree than most movie-to-book renditions I've seen.

      I guess the fundamental difference is that LotR is a farly simple linear story, whereas the HHGTTG is largely non-linear, surreal, and sometimes comletely off the track ;)

      But as you say, it still might (and probably will) be good.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    3. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Kevan_moran · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There was also a play that was on in London in the late 70's. After the radio show but before the TV show.

      Some of my friends went to see a 'final' dress rehearsal and it overran by a couple of hours. They were serious hardcore fans and even they hated it.

      So yes, you can the the material and deliver it badly. I hope they do well this time.

      And yeh, Peter Jones - you don't want to be late, as in the late Arthur Dent, it's a threat you know, I'm told they can be quite effective.

      Completely deadpan delivery.

    4. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alas, you have the question the wrong way around.
      The books *never* captured the essence of the radio series (and neither did the records or TV show)

    5. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Goth+Biker+Babe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure about this. The thing about the radio plays comming first was that the strange sound affects, tunes and dialogue forced you to imaging just how unbelievably weird everything was with not much description by the characters. The early books were an extrapolation of this. Now with the later books we've all read the books first and so the 'scenery' has been described to us and our imaginations no longer need to work.

      As they say the pictures are *always* better on radio.

    6. Re:Will it do the books justice? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      Michael Ende's A Neverending Story, read the book. Really, you should.

      I did, and it's one of the very, very rare times I think that the movie is better than the book. The first half is alright, but in the end when Bastian becomes all powerful, it's just awful. The book is so boring and so tedious, and Bastian lost all my sympathy. He became a self centered jerk. The only thing I liked about the book was the different colored text to let you know what world things were happening in.

    7. Re:Will it do the books justice? by nagora · · Score: 1
      But I'm still not sure that radio, nor film, can do the books justice. The surreal whimsical quality is just very hard to convey.

      Quite the opposite: the books never quite captured the atmosphere of the original versions. A lot of effort was put into the sound effects and background music and it paid off.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    8. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      Michael Ende's A Neverending Story, read the book. Really, you should.

      I did, and it's one of the very, very rare times I think that the movie is better than the book. The first half is alright, but in the end when Bastian becomes all powerful, it's just awful. The book is so boring and so tedious, and Bastian lost all my sympathy. He became a self centered jerk. The only thing I liked about the book was the different colored text to let you know what world things were happening in.


      The whole point of the book lies within the transformation of Bastian. The story is just an abstraction of how you must never let go of your imagination, nor lose the ability to play. That's my interpretation anyway.

      Bastian does become a jerk, but he pays a price: He gradually loses the memories of his childhood, and therein he loses his inner child.

      Unfortunately there are people who does just this as they get older. They are usually unhappy, self centered jerks.

      Just my 2 cents, anyway.

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    9. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is offtopic, but I must defend us previously-sensitive-nice-guys-who-learnt-to-be-je rks here.

      Today's world and workplaces are such that if your "inner child" (ugh, I hate that term) doesn't grow up, you'll just end up abused. This applies to romantic relationships, work and life in general. You'll just get pushed around if you don't learn how to be a jerk when required (terminating a failing relationship or "correcting" employee's/subordinate's bad attitude at work by chewing him/her down, for instance).

      I made my "inner child" grow up and I feel much more balanced a person as a result. I can still be that nice sensitive guy, but I can also play the Machiavellian office politics with the best of them.

    10. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      I made my "inner child" grow up and I feel much more balanced a person as a result. I can still be that nice sensitive guy, but I can also play the Machiavellian office politics with the best of them.

      I'm not saying you shouldn't grow up, but my point is that you should never ever forget how to play. The two aren't mutually exclusive :)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    11. Re:Will it do the books justice? by glawrie · · Score: 1

      I was lucky enough to hear the first series when it was first broadcast (and went to see the play - but the less said about that the better).

      I agree that it is going to be hard for any new incarnations of the story to do it justice. But the real difficulty faced is going to be familiarity with the plot: surely it is one of the most well known about stories of the recent modern age. Part of the captivating thrill of listening to the first series was simply that you had no idea what was going to happen next - both in terms of plot line and plot devices. We were amused and intrigued by the originality of the story / format: I think that is something hard to recapture. I suppose the TV show might have got away with it because many who watched possibly hadn't heard (or heard of) the radio play. But, as with the recent Lord of the Rings film, any new audiences will go looking to see 'how their favourite bit was... visualised / dramatised / messed up etc.

      It is a pity that Douglas Adams is not around. But I don't think there is much evidence that his being around protected against bad translations (i.e. play, TV show). A much greater pity is the absence of Peter Jones.

    12. Re:Will it do the books justice? by ader · · Score: 1

      In the case of the final book, Mostly Harmless, it is to be sincerely hoped not. They can only make the radio version better.

      Ade_
      /

      --
      Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
    13. Re:Will it do the books justice? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      And yeh, Peter Jones - you don't want to be late, as in the late Arthur Dent, it's a threat you know, I'm told they can be quite effective.

      iirc, it was mroe along the lines of (and I've made mistakes here too)

      come quickly, or you'll be late
      late? late for what?
      what is your name earth creature?
      dent. arthur dent
      late as in the late dentartherdent, it's a threat you know, I'm told they can be quite effective :)

      still an excellent bit though, I wonder if they'll have any music by pink floyd that the bbc lawyers can remove when it goes to cd?

      dave

    14. Re:Will it do the books justice? by kill-9-0 · · Score: 1

      This is my fear as well. However if someone with a passion for it is acting as producer, hopefully it will work well.

      --
      Liberalism...the next best thing to thinking.
    15. Re:Will it do the books justice? by TomV · · Score: 1

      and went to see the play - but the less said about that the better

      Oh I don't know, it was pretty fab night out for 12-year-old-me. I saw the Theatr Clwyd production, and they used a classic yellow Tonka toy bulldozer, adding a very special note to "Mr Dent, do you have any idea how much damage this bulldozer would suffer if I let it run you over?"

      But I don't think there is much evidence that his being around protected against bad translations (i.e. play, TV show). A much greater pity is the absence of Peter Jones.

      Hopefully John Lloyd will have a say, and HHGTTG was his baby too, so I trust him. But yes, for me it always was:
      "The Hitch Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy, by Douglas Adams, starring Peter Jones as The Book". Everyone else was credited at the end, denoting their apparent lesser importance.

      Towels can be harmful if swallowed in large quantities.

    16. Re:Will it do the books justice? by glawrie · · Score: 1

      I saw the Theatr Clwyd production

      I got to go to the original version (at Rainbow Theatre in Finsbury Park, London) and it was not good. But I'm sure that there have been better productions since...

      I am hopeful though - I am sure that the collective TV memory of HHG suffers partly because whenever it comes up they show clips from the BBC TV series... Work on new radio material might in turn inspire new visual material and this might be used to update the clips.

    17. Re:Will it do the books justice? by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      For those who have seen the utterly horrible adaptation...

      Or Alan Smithee's extended TV version of Dune..

    18. Re:Will it do the books justice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Richard Vernon (as Slartibartfast), not Peter Jones.

    19. Re:Will it do the books justice? by jmb-d · · Score: 1

      I'm fully aware that the guide started as a radio series in the first place... But I'm still not sure that radio, nor film, can do the books justice. The surreal whimsical quality is just very hard to convey.

      So, you haven't actually heard any of the radio series, yet you're criticzing it?

      *Harumph*

      --
      In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
      -- Yun-Men
  4. Mixed-up order? by KFury · · Score: 2, Funny

    I assume that, in order to pay proper homage to the nature of the migration from radio to books for the original series, they'll rip the three new books apart and rearrange them in seemingly random order?

    (I'm still pissed that the SOBs reordered the Narnia books in current collections. How can you possibly appreciate The Magician's Nephew without having read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Stupidheads.)

    1. Re:Mixed-up order? by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 1
      (I'm still pissed that the SOBs reordered the Narnia books in current collections. How can you possibly appreciate The Magician's Nephew without having read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Stupidheads.)
      Now that's just friggin stupid, CSL had a progression of both world and philosophy throughout the Narnia series that only works with Magician's Nephew late in the series. This progression can be seen to a much greater extent in his Cosmic Trilogy (or Ransom Trilogy) which contains Out of the Silent Planet, Perelandra, and That Hideous Strength. Although some say the third book in that series is so different in both styling and story that it might be a better series without it, it does add greatly to the overall storyline and mythos. I guess some folks just want to screw with other's Art.

      Jonah Hex
    2. Re:Mixed-up order? by agentforsythe · · Score: 0

      you jest, surely? The magician's nephew quite clearly goes before the lion the witch and the wardrobe.

    3. Re:Mixed-up order? by fyonn · · Score: 1

      (I'm still pissed that the SOBs reordered the Narnia books in current collections. How can you possibly appreciate The Magician's Nephew without having read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Stupidheads.)

      well, I don't think they re-ordered as such, the books are in timeline order, but not in order of being written, the magicians nephew is, of course, a prequel.

      I think that nephew and last battle were the worst of the seven, were they written at roughly the same time? I think my favourite was "a horse and his boy" but I've not read them in a long time. I wonder where my copies of those books are, at my mum's somewhere I think. I really ought to dig them out and read them again.

      dave

    4. Re:Mixed-up order? by Xolotl · · Score: 1

      The story is set earlier, but the book was written later when the world CSL created was more complete. It's like Star Wars - the new films are chronologically set earlier than the originals, but seeing them in chronological order would(I think) make less sense.

    5. Re:Mixed-up order? by darkest_light · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that really bothers me, especially since the canon *changed* by the end of the series and it's impossible to get a sense of that if you read it in chronological order. Plus, who would read a series where you don't get an uninterrupted version of the *real* main characters until books four and on? Moving Magician's Nephew to the first book was wrong (I don't know that I would have read any more of the series if it started out like that instead of with The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe... it's a terrible "let's draw people into this fantasy world" book), but sticking A Horse and His Boy *between* The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe and Prince Caspian? Sacrilege....

      I'm young enough that I'm fortunate I read the books early, because they changed the order only a year or two later. Most people my age, and almost everyone just a bit younger, thinks of the series as going in the other order, and that makes me very, very sad.

      I don't think that the radio show will be as horrible as that, though. TV and radio always screw up the order of things--that's just a fact of life. I think anyone who is inspired to read the books by the radio show (new converts... muahahaha!) will be able to handle it. Other people are just stupid anyway

      *realizes that is off-topic. Drinks Earl Gray tea and thinks hard about the number 42 to bring self back*

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina.
    6. Re:Mixed-up order? by tolan's+my+name · · Score: 1

      As someone who read them in the 'NEW' order (well I read LWW first then reread it in order) could you post up the new order?

      And voyages was lawsy my favorite.

      Thanks

    7. Re:Mixed-up order? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm still pissed that the SOBs reordered the Narnia books in current collections. How can you possibly appreciate The Magician's Nephew without having read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Stupidheads."

      Hear Hear!!! I definitely agree with you!

    8. Re:Mixed-up order? by darkest_light · · Score: 1
      The original order was:
      Lion, Witch, Wardrobe, Prince Caspian, Voyage of the Dawn Treader, Silver Chair, Horse and His Boy, Magician's Nephew, Last Battle

      (I think) the new order is:
      MN, LWW, HHB, PC, VDT, SC, LB

      --
      Orationem pulchram non habens, scribo ista linea in lingua Latina.
    9. Re:Mixed-up order? by Jokkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      (I'm still pissed that the SOBs reordered the Narnia books in current collections. How can you possibly appreciate The Magician's Nephew without having read The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe? Stupidheads.)

      The reordering was done in an attempt to honor C.S. Lewis's wishes. A couple of quotes, for more information:

      HarperCollins and the C.S. Lewis companiy "renumbered the entire Chronicles of Narnia on the basis of a letter Lewis wrote to a child suggesting that he preferred to read them in Narnian chronology rather than the order in which they were written." (source)

      "It must be conceded that in a letter written in 1957 (published in 'Letters to Children'), Lewis did appear to state a mild preference for the chronological order. But in that same letter Lewis concluded: 'So perhaps it does not matter very much in which order anyone read them.'" (source)

      With that said, I prefer the original ordering. Oh well.

    10. Re:Mixed-up order? by tolan's+my+name · · Score: 1

      Thank you, you sir are a scholar and a gentleman.

    11. Re:Mixed-up order? by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      I'm more upset that when the BBC had The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe as part of the 'Big Read' season, I could still remember 'Turkish Delight', some 31 years after reading the damn book.

      Made my girlfriend laugh, though. ;(

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  5. United States release? by lisany · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Wonder how long it'll be before the radioplay makes its way to American radio...

    1. Re:United States release? by Gherald · · Score: 1

      sounds like a job for suprnova.org

    2. Re:United States release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you shoud be able to /.-effect the bbc website to hear it live....

    3. Re:United States release? by Mwongozi · · Score: 4, Informative

      You don't have to wait. When broadcast, you will be able to listen directly. All BBC Radio stations are streamed live on the net.

    4. Re:United States release? by peginald · · Score: 0, Redundant

      They are streamed live AND usually archived for at least a week. Have a look at BBC Radio 4 ListenAgain"

    5. Re:United States release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the Beeb is planning on archiving all it's content - starting with the newest stuff first. And, I suspect, this would be their ideal 1st item!

    6. Re:United States release? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After that, I'd give it approx 10 minues encoding time before you'll start finding it on Bittorrent/Kazaa/etc.

  6. Remarkable!! by lina_inverse · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just started reading the third book in the trilogy, too! The probability of this happening must be pretty low..

    1. Re:Remarkable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have too! Then again, what's the probability of meeting a life form in the universe, if on average there are none :)

    2. Re:Remarkable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because you're the only person in the world, aren't you?

    3. Re:Remarkable!! by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      The probability of this happening must be pretty low..

      Well, something this improbable is bound to be the first thing to happen as soon as you consider the improbability drive... :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    4. Re:Remarkable!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      How do you know that's not the case?

      I mean I know that I am real, but I don't know about the rest of you.

    5. Re:Remarkable!! by fyonn · · Score: 1

      I just started reading the third book in the trilogy, too! The probability of this happening must be pretty low..

      "is this sort of thing going to happen everytime we use the improbability drive?"
      "very probably"
      "oh god, zaphod beeblebrox, this is a very large drink. hi!"

    6. Re:Remarkable!! by chmod000 · · Score: 1

      Since they are all products of a deranged imagination anyway, this would depend on how long it's been since your last Pan-Galactic Gargle Blaster.

      --
      Aptal soru yoktur; sadece merakli aptallar vardir.
  7. radiophonics workshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I hope the BBC radiophonics workshop is involved once again, since there is no mention of them in the article.

    1. Re:radiophonics workshop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC Radiophonics Workshop was closed down in the late 90s, unfortunately.

    2. Re:radiophonics workshop by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BBC Radiophonic Workshop was closed YEARS ago, more's the pity.

      Still, there are LOADS of CDs of their work available now, so it's not all bad...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:radiophonics workshop by ader · · Score: 1

      The what?? It was shut down years ago in the name of outsourcing and private enterprise.

      Ade_
      /

      --
      Big Bubbles (no troubles) - what sucks, who sucks and you suck
    4. Re:radiophonics workshop by angusr · · Score: 1
      Long since closed. There was a recent documentary on the history of the Radiophonic Workshop on BBC4 called Alchemists of Sound.

      However, as far as music went they were only involved in the second radio series; in the first radio series the music was all taken from commercially available sources (which explains the continuing lack of the "Do you realise that this robot can hum like Pink Floyd?" joke on the CDs and tapes - not because of the Pink Floyd music, but because of the Beatles music Marvin hums next. They never got recording rights, and so only have broadcast rights)

  8. Stateside indeed by ActionPlant · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see this syndicated on public radio, though internet radio will have to do for now. Anyone know of any BBC stations listed on iTunes?

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
    1. Re:Stateside indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging by the book's popularity in America, NPR may run a BBC feed of the radio show.

    2. Re:Stateside indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can listen to BBC radio output online - see http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/

  9. The Book by EngMedic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm going to miss Peter Jones as The Book, though...

    --
    filter: +3. Hey, look! all the trolls went away!
  10. originals by tabby · · Score: 1

    I used to have tapes of the original series when the ABC replayed it years ago (about 1987 or 88 I think), I was about 12 and it blew my mind. They did it in 2x6 hour blocks over two weeks. The first one ended with Ford and Arthur on pre-historic earth. The second one was completely different to the books although there where elements of them in it. Where these two series? And are they available on disc or anything?

    --
    I've experiments to run, there is research to be done on the people who are still alive.
    1. Re:originals by ColmanReilly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure, the BBC sell them off their web-site, as do Amazon I expect. CD or cassette sets.

    2. Re:originals by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 1

      I used to have tapes of the original series when the ABC replayed it years ago (about 1987 or 88 I think), I was about 12 and it blew my mind. They did it in 2x6 hour blocks over two weeks. The first one ended with Ford and Arthur on pre-historic earth. The second one was completely different to the books although there where elements of them in it. Where these two series? And are they available on disc or anything?

      Not only did I get mp3's of the radio series off WinMX, I *also* got all 6 television episodes!

      Copyright or not, you can't get this shit many other places. (Although they do tend to release the original radio series from time to time, last time I recall seeing it in stores was over 10 years ago, though)

      --
      Like what I said? You might like my music
    3. Re:originals by ColmanReilly · · Score: 1

      To be more precise, try www.bbcshop.com and search for hitchhikers.

      Includes an MP3 CD with all the episodes from the radio series.

    4. Re:originals by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1
      Quoth fucksl4shd0t:
      Not only did I get mp3's of the radio series off WinMX, I *also* got all 6 television episodes!

      Copyright or not, you can't get this shit many other places. (Although they do tend to release the original radio series from time to time, last time I recall seeing it in stores was over 10 years ago, though)
      Oddly enough, I've been able to buy cassettes of the original radio series and the television series on dvd in the past year. I guess it just depends on where you look.

      ZzzzSleep
  11. Sorry, nothing to hear here move along by LardBrattish · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I listened to the HGTTG in the '70s when I was still at school. It was a revelation.

    I bought the books when they came out but was rather disappointed.

    The less said about the TV show the better.

    I expect the movie to be awful but I hope I'm wrong.

    I cannot see how this new radio series; so distant from the original in every respect can be anything other than a sad attempt to cash in - This time the BBC will be selling the records, towels and plush Vogon toys.

    Hopefully a sizable abount of money will go to a bunch of deserving people who did so much to bring the series to life in the first place - otherwise I can't see any upside. The later books were shite anyway ;)

    --
    What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    1. Re:Sorry, nothing to hear here move along by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot see how this new radio series; so distant from the original in every respect can be anything other than a sad attempt to cash in - This time the BBC will be selling the records, towels and plush Vogon toys.

      I'd buy my nieces and nephews a fucking vogon plush toy, esp if it spewed vogan poetry. HGTTG is a laugh and has a dry british charm to it, rather then the current typical craze of Pokieman which is best described by south park as being, "it's not so much violent but stupid".

      I would also buy them a british police telephone box shaped telephone, but I've only seen on on "murder most horrid".

      But could the parent troll be correct and this is a shameless marketing plan? Could be, so why the hell shouldn't the BBC make a buck on the global comercial market?

    2. Re:Sorry, nothing to hear here move along by LardBrattish · · Score: 1

      Ok, Who modded this down & why? Am I not allowed to criticise the later Hitchhiker books? Please explain. Is there really anyone who can give me a reasonable argument to convince me that "So long and thanks for all the fish" is even half as good as the original book?

      Now to the shameless marketing ploy comment. That wasn't entirely what I meant but seing as the dear old Beeb is really short of cash it makes sense.

      Doctor Who is being revived... Anyone else see a pattern here? It's something I've been thinking for some time. Dr Who does make more sense to me than Hitchhikers mainly for the reasons given in my original post.

      What I was referring to was the fact that the BBC didn't have control of the original Hitchhiker spinoffs. This resulted in the series being re-recorded for the LP records which had script revisions included. (As Geoffrey Perkins put it DNA was one of the few writers who would have less script on the day of recording than he had two days earlier) The BBC were limited to the Original radio series on cassette (and later CD) and the TV show spinoffs which for some reason weren't as lucrative...

      DNA got all the royalties for the official towel ;)

      --
      What are you listening to? (http://megamanic.blogetery.com/)
    3. Re:Sorry, nothing to hear here move along by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      I, too, listened to the series on radio while at school.

      I definitely enjoyed the books, thought the TV series was fun, and hate to think what the Americans will do to the film.

      I'm looking forward to the new radio treatment - it won't be as good as the original, but it'll be a hell of a lot better than a lot of stuff we hear.

      And "I expect the movie to be awful but I hope I'm wrong." is a terribly Marvinesque thing to say.

      Marvin - the finest leterary creation since Eeyore.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  12. Re:The lesson to be learned here by arkhan_jg · · Score: 4, Informative
    Alas, BBC radio only broadcasts realplayer streams.

    The most likely station they'll broadcast on will be radio 4, as that is the talk radio station that gets dramas, series, comedy etc.

    If they do, there's a good chance it'll end up archived on listen again, or possibly BBCi H2G2

    --
    Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
  13. Fun BBC tech stats: by rf0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    http://support.bbc.co.uk/support/

    Rus

    1. Re:Fun BBC tech stats: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we know. Shame about the Vorbis feeds though.

  14. Eagles by Doomrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they'll still use The Eagles - Journey of the Sorceror for the theme.

    I had a nightmare about the upcoming movie. I dreamed that Linkin Park covered this song for the soundtrack. I hadn't woken up screaming like that for years. My sheets were wet, and I don't mean with passion.

    1. Re:Eagles by Robmonster · · Score: 1

      Oh dear God... Dont give them any ideas!!!

      --
      I have no sig yet I must scream.
    2. Re:Eagles by benjymous · · Score: 1

      Or just do what they did with the TV series and make a badly-remade cheapo version of the music which isn't quite the same (probably to save having to pay music royalties)

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    3. Re:Eagles by Robmonster · · Score: 1

      Radio Hitchhikers wont be Radio Hitchhikers without the proper theme tune.

      --
      I have no sig yet I must scream.
  15. Better Radio than Movie by tmk · · Score: 1

    I cannot tell you exactly why - but I'm afraid of the movie, but I am glad to hear about the BBC plans.

    And I know exactly where my towel is...

    1. Re:Better Radio than Movie by benjymous · · Score: 1

      Well, with disney money, I get the gut feeling that it'll be utterly sanitised and americanised
      *sigh*

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    2. Re:Better Radio than Movie by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I know why. Because HHTTG already has a wonderful radio adaptation, and it already has a not-so-wonderful video adaptation. So it's reasonable to expect more of the same.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    3. Re:Better Radio than Movie by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      No matter how big the movie budget, the graphics are always better on radio.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  16. About Time! But... by Kyrthira · · Score: 1

    ... if I have to listen to any more 'poetry' I'll gouge out my ears with a spoon...

    --
    ~Kyrthira Phelan~
  17. MICHAEL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is he really fired? Is the long, dark nightmare finally over or is he going to return and punish those who rejoiced at the (false) news?

  18. Shameless fanboy by Arbo · · Score: 1

    Yes, I admit to being a shameless fanboy of DNA's work. I would read starwars/neon genesis evangelion slash/erotica if someone told me he wrote it. That they're making a radio progamme out of it? Excellent. The movie? I know it's going to suck, but I hope against hope that the story is given at least half of the justice that its due. After reading the books, I tried to write a screenplay to it. I got as far as choosing who to play which parts: Hugh Grant as Dent. The "prodigal roommate" of A Beautiful Mind as Ford Prefect. Alan Rickman as Slartibartfast.. and I forget the rest. :)

    1. Re:Shameless fanboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. A successful TV-show or a movie must have lots of hot babes in bikinis. You can justify it by artistic license. Not some male actors who're probably gay anyway.

    2. Re:Shameless fanboy by Joel+Rowbottom · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ISTR that Douglas himself had a 'dream cast' for the movie, which (from memory) included:
      • Simon Jones as Arthur (naturally)
      • Jeff Goldblum as Ford
      • Eddie Murphy as Zaphod
      I can't remember who the preferred choices for Marvin and Trillian were, but I'm sure you can dig for it somewhere.

      And before someone volunteers Danny John-Jules as Zaphod, no no no no no - he's great as Cat but if he played Zaphod, it'd just be the cat with two heads.

      Hmm, cat with two heads. Let me get my hacksaw...

      --
      Smegma.
    3. Re:Shameless fanboy by The+Night+Watchman · · Score: 1

      I can't remember who the preferred choices for Marvin and Trillian were, but I'm sure you can dig for it somewhere.

      Well, I don't know what DNA's preferences for these characters were, but here are my own choices...
      Marvin: Steve Wright
      Trillian: Famke Janssen

      --
      "Every jumbled pile of person has a thinking part that wonders what the part that isn't thinking isn't thinking of"-TMBG
    4. Re:Shameless fanboy by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Stephen Moore is the only choice for Marvin

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  19. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clean the jizz off the remote control before you go to bed. Last time you forgot. Mom thought it was dad's jizz and she smacked him upside the head.

  20. s/Adoption/Adaptation/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bla bla lameness filter filler bla bla bla

  21. because it RULED by RMH101 · · Score: 1
    ...it was live action: ie a radio drama, not just reading out of the book. big (but cheap!) production, full stereo effects, the book was BASED UPON THE RADIO SERIES that DNA wrote, for god's sake. even the radio scripts book is brilliant.

    if you have to ask, you've not heard it. i've got it all on mp3 and it still sounds great.

  22. New challenges for BBC Radiophonic Workshop by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 1

    Apparently, the original series had the sound effects workshop up in arms -- Douglas Adams had given them all the instructions they needed, with the wit and clarity well matching the radio series as a whole.

    If you were a sound engineer charged with producing fx, how would YOU react to the sound description of a typical office building flying through space, to pick one example? :-)

    1. Re:New challenges for BBC Radiophonic Workshop by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      If you were a sound engineer charged with producing fx, how would YOU react to the sound description of a typical office building flying through space, to pick one example? :-)

      That's easy. First you take the sound of a freight traing passing at moderate speed. You play that back at 2/3 speed, filtering out some highs, and adding hall reverb and flange.

      Then you combine that with the sound of typing and paper shredding.

      Finally add a standard-issue-starship-enterprise-warp-core-hum and we're all done!

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
  23. Re:The lesson to be learned here by holy+zarquon's+singi · · Score: 1

    and with vsound you can turn the RA stream into something a little more convenient. I've spent a few weeks totally rediscovering the excellent commedy output on bbc radio 4.

    --
    "...we should just trust our president in every decision that he makes and we should just support that." B.Spears 2003
  24. How to record streamed radio by Bushcat · · Score: 1
    All 10 national BBC radio stations are streamed on the internet, plus the World Service, plus BBC local radio. See here for the stations. BBC7 streams old comedy, plays and books exclusively. Some of the material on all stations remains available for up to 7 days, depending on copyright.

    If you're listening live, you can choose RealPlayer or Media Player. I think audio on demand is limited to RealPlayer.

    With Total Recorder, you can capture the stream (and any other digital or analog audio stream in your computer) and save the resulting file(s) in any format you want. It has powerful automatic file naming, editing and scheduling tools, so since BBC7 repeats its output twice or more in a 24-hour cycle, I capture one stream to disk automatically divided into 15-minute chunks at 48kbps/22500kHz stereo, then schedule on-demand audio for other BBC programmes I want. The software gets the URL, starts RealAudio, does the capturing and shuts everything down nicely afterwards. It's an outstanding product.

  25. Link to HHGTTG mp3's by jintxo · · Score: 1

    Check out the link to the radio series mp3's :-) http://www.neurotoxin.net/~jsbehr/hhgttg/

    1. Re:Link to HHGTTG mp3's by Gubbe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Check out the link to the radio series mp3's
      or in other words: "Oh look, a rampaging stampede of mad elephants! Let's steer them this way!"
    2. Re:Link to HHGTTG mp3's by jintxo · · Score: 1

      better yet: "Let's steer them THAT way!"

    3. Re:Link to HHGTTG mp3's by phr4gmonk3y · · Score: 1

      It appears that your link is forbidden. Possibly a /. effect?

      Also,

      To anyone who hasn't listened to the broadcast, and enjoyed the book, (I too, am a DNA fanboy) LISTEN TO THEM. The series acuratley represents the book, which is logical, seeing as how the book came from the radio. The film version will never get close to this.

  26. I think I speak on behalf of everyone here ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when I say fapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfapfap
    fapfapfap fapfapfap

  27. what was sceond? by misterpies · · Score: 1


    Why is this the "tertiary" phase, given only one radio series has been made so far? (Was the secondary phase the TV adaptation?)

    Given that the original radio series anticipated a lot of what happened in the first 3 books, it will be interesting to see if the new show takes account of that or if it tries to be a faithful adaptation of the books.

    (BTW, any HHGTTG fan who has not heard the series should definitely do so -- OK so the characters' voices were nothing like what I had imagined, but it's brilliant and IMO superior to the book).

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    1. Re:what was sceond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There were two series of HHGTTG broadcast on the radio, with the second series being waaaaaay different to the storyline in the books.

      See amazon.co.uk

    2. Re:what was sceond? by RayAlmostAnonymous · · Score: 1

      Also there was a 'Christmas special' between the two series that has never been released on CD or anything. I can not remember much of the plot but it did explain what had become of Trillian.

    3. Re:what was sceond? by mph · · Score: 1
      Also there was a 'Christmas special' between the two series that has never been released on CD or anything. I can not remember much of the plot but it did explain what had become of Trillian.
      Didn't she go to the planet of the Wookies with Bea Arthur?
    4. Re:what was sceond? by jorenko · · Score: 1

      There are 12 episodes of HHG radio so far:
      1-6 - Series 1 - includes destruction of earth through return to prehistoric earth with the Golgafrinchans.
      7 - Christmas special - Sort of a "Hey, we're back" epsiode transitioning into the second series.
      8-12 - Series 2 - Frogstar to the real leader of the Galaxy, and a lot of places in between that never made it to print.

      Oh, and Trillian was carried off and forcibly married to someone-or-other.

  28. Who's William Franklyn? by benjymous · · Score: 1
    Those joining them will include William Franklyn as the voice of the Book...


    I looked him up on IMDb and I'm none the wiser.

    I wonder if he'll be doing a Peter Jones impression, or if they'll just explain it away as an upgrade to the book's firmware, or something

    --
    Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    1. Re:Who's William Franklyn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Lots more info here

    2. Re:Who's William Franklyn? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, I wonder if they'll bother explaining it at all. I wonder because I also can't help but wonder how close of an adaptation this is going to be. If they hedge closely to the books, they'll need to either go to some length to explain the very different place that the second radio series ended up when compared to the Restaurant at the End of the Universe novel, or disregard much of the second radio series entirely. Specifically, they'll need to explain what happens to Ford and Zaphod, reintroduce Trillian, and write-out one or two characters who existed only in the radio play, and never appeared in any of the books.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  29. The First Hitchikers Radio in the US by rdominelli · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of a commercial source for the first hitchikers radio series? I tried ordering it through the BBC and they wont ship to the states.

    Thanks

    Rich in NY

    --
    There is no spoon
    1. Re:The First Hitchikers Radio in the US by Rob+Seace · · Score: 1

      Yep, http://www.zbs.org/ has CDs of lots of radio series, including the Guide... It's not exactly cheap, but it's available, anyway...

  30. This has already been done in Finland by AnarchyBurger · · Score: 1

    YLE, the finnish equivalent of BBC did a radio version of all HHGTTG books in the 80's (25 x 30-40 minutes). I didn't actually know that BBC series wasn't as long, because I thought that YLE version vas just translated version of it. (Only weird thing was that I couldn't find BBC episodes 13-25 from any P2P network..)

    I've heard both BBC and YLE versions, and I think YLE has better actors. Especially the voices for the Book and Marvin are better than their english counterparts. Too bad that most of you can't understand finnish..

    1. Re:This has already been done in Finland by TomV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the BBC radio series consisted of 12 half-hour episodes (and a Christmas special), titled from "fit the first" to "fit the twelfth" in homage to "The Hunting of the Snark".

      If the plot of the YLE version matched the plot of the books then it wasn't a translation of the Radio Series, rather a fresh adaptation from the books. Basically, if it mentioned Hig Hurtenflurst, the Dolmansaxlil Shoe Corporation, the Shoe Event Horizon, the Bird People Of Brontitall, hundreds of cloned archaeologists named Lintilla, a thirteen mile high statue of Arthur Dent Throwing the Nutrimatic Cup and the Ruler Of The Univers and his cat, and small lemon-soaked paper napkins it was adapted from the Radio Series. If not, it was from the books.

    2. Re:This has already been done in Finland by BigBadBri · · Score: 1
      No, but you've probably got better fjords.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
  31. Belgian by rodney+dill · · Score: 1




    ...He said, gratuitously

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:Belgian by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      First of all, it's "Belgium", not "Belgian".

      Second of all, you didn't use it in a Serious Screenplay.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    2. Re:Belgian by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, correct. What do you expect of one with somewhat less intelligence than Arthur Dent.

      (We're never quite so dumb as when we are trying to be smart -- Linus Van Pelt)

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
  32. Differences between the books, the scripts, etc... by jayayeem · · Score: 1

    The differences between the versions of the Hitchhikers Guide in its various formats were one of the great strengths of the franchise. There's no other contemporary story that I would read the book, read the scripts, listen to the recording, watch the movie, and watch the TV show. The little twists that DNA added or deleted made each new telling worthwhile.

    I worry that whoever is tasked to write this new version will try to be "true to DNA's legacy", and not add anything to the new telling to distinguish it from the old.

    --
    I metamoderate, therefore I am
  33. Radio shows before they were books. by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 1
    ...they will be adapting the final three Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy books for radio

    But they were radio shows before they were books. So this is really from radio to books to radio. Or from radio to radio.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    1. Re:Radio shows before they were books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      the last 3 books were never on the radio. The first radio series formed the basis of the first two books, and the second radio series is pretty much an entity unto itself. Bits of it appear in the books, but not the whole thing.
      The Krikkit Wars of book 3 will be a joy to hear on radio.

      The second series ended "Will there ever be another series?"
      HURRAH !! YES!!

      Lets hope they are a success, and that the company goes on to acquire the rights to the Dirk Gently books too!!!!

  34. Re:Differences between the books, the scripts, etc by li99sh79 · · Score: 1
    I worry that whoever is tasked to write this new version will try to be "true to DNA's legacy", and not add anything to the new telling to distinguish it from the old.

    of course if they do add something to distinguish it from the old they'll get reamed by the fanboys for "mucking up a perfectly good thing."

    -sam

    --
    I was just here, where did I go?
  35. Re:only virgins care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so I guess 99.9% of slasdot cares.

    I can state honestly and unequivocally that *NOT* only virgins care. Honest truth, I had sex this morning before I came to work. I felt a dopamine spike in my brain as I entered her, and when I got to work this morning and saw this story I felt another (not as strong) dopamine spike. So, your theory is flawed. Just because you've never gotten laid, please don't assume for the rest of us!

  36. An as to why it took so long.... by red+floyd · · Score: 3, Funny

    W-E... A-P-O-L-O-G-I-Z-E... F-O-R... T-H-E... I-N-C-O-N-V-E-N-I-E-N-C-E

    [this text is inserted to defeat the lameness filter, because nobody would ever be *quoting* something in all caps, so it's obviously lame]

    --
    The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
  37. Russia Hump by RussiaHump · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, radio humps YOU!

    --
    I am the Russian Humper !!
  38. Re:wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, i hope it's worse than the last one.

  39. I Prefer the TV Show by meehawl · · Score: 1

    Is it okay to admit that I prefer the BBC TV Series? Killer music, funky pseudo "advanced" fake computer graphics, and some excellent spaceship models. It's a pity about Zaphod's lame extra head though.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:I Prefer the TV Show by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall that the extra head was at the time touted as being cutting edge SFX technology! I'm *sure* it was on Tomorrows World.

  40. And it looks like the movie's on it's way too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.douglasadams.com/news/

    Been given the green light it seems.

  41. he First Hitchikers Radio in the US on Amazon by Psykopat · · Score: 1

    The Radio Series (and the complete audio books) are on sell on Amazon.com. 7*8=42

  42. NO! by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

    You goddamn fuckers! Don't do it! Adams was a genius. You guys are nothing...NOTHING!

    Go make cinderella 3, you fucking Disney media whores. Douglas Adams is DEAD, and nothing will bring him back. DO NOT URINATE ON HIS GRAVE!

  43. URL Disappeared by hackel · · Score: 0

    The above URL has disappeared from BBC's website! Was this a mistake? Anyone know any more about this? I know it was working yesterday, since we all read it!

    1. Re:URL Disappeared by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1
      Yes, and no sign of it on the Douglas Adams link quoted a couple of posts ago, either.

      How strange.

  44. ISO: A current version of the referenced article by lvirden · · Score: 1

    I just tried the link above and it is no longer
    valid (well, it's been nearly a week - can't still call it news, now can we...)

    Anyone have a pointer to an archive version of the article? Their search engine left much to be desired (32 pages of links referencing hitchhiker guide galaxy)

    --
    URL: http://xanga.com/lvirden > Quote: Saving the world before bedtime. Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, n