Slashdot Mirror


Space Station Leak Found, Fixed

Rommel writes "NewScientist.com is reporting that the cause of the leak in the International Space Station has been found and fixed. The leak was found in a hose in the Destiny lab module. The hose was used to equalize pressure and eliminate fog between two panes of a window. While the leak was so slow it was unlikely to pose a direct threat to the crew for months to come, some equipment on the ISS is only certified to operate above a certain air pressure. The leak was originally mentioned on Slashdot a few days back."

225 comments

  1. Hack comics all over the country rejoice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as they now get to make "first leak in space" jokes.

  2. I would like to think... by Orion442 · · Score: 0, Interesting

    If I was on the space station and there was a leak, that fucker would be found a lot sooner than a week.

    1. Re:I would like to think... by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, but just think of all the tubing, wall panels, airlocks, windows, and god knows what else that had to be check. And especially since it was a leak in a piece of tubing, I'm surprised they found it so fast.

    2. Re:I would like to think... by TobiasSodergren · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the foam from the weekly foam-party was all-of-a-sudden visible from the outside

    3. Re:I would like to think... by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Funny

      "If I was on the space station and there was a leak, that fucker would be found a lot sooner than a week."

      If you were on the space station, the leak wouldn't have been accidental.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:I would like to think... by Orion442 · · Score: 0

      After a few zero-g Bud Lights, yeah, you're probably right. "Hey dude! What's this button for?" ;) Although my ass would be the first in the life boat...

    5. Re:I would like to think... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "If you were on the space station, the leak wouldn't have been accidental."

      Hehe that was kinda funny. The mods took it a bit too seriously, though.

  3. Didn't read the article... by Michael+Crutcher · · Score: 3, Funny

    .. but they used Bart's diamond earing, right?

    1. Re:Didn't read the article... by MysticGlyph · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is actually a bit frightening when you think about it. If it took them nearly a month to find this problem imagine if it were a much more serious threat. You would hope that the station would have sensitive enough monitering equipment to detect where problems are occurring. I would probably think twice about spending my powerball winnings on a vacation to the ISS and wait till the Hilton is on the moon, ...no not Paris you dirty minded /.er, although 0-Gravity sex... ...nevermind.

      --
      Try my new smokable Sig, ...Sig-erette.
    2. Re:Didn't read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paris Hilton in a low-g environment... now that does sound like a good way to spend my powerball payout.

    3. Re:Didn't read the article... by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

      RTFA. It was reported to have a leak on Janurary 5th. They found it on the 12th. Thats pretty good considerign how much they had to check.

      --

      Gorkman

    4. Re:Didn't read the article... by 0123456 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it was a bigger problem it would probably be easier to find. If you were losing 1 psi an hour from a significant leak, it wouldn't be hard to track down even without any special instruments.

    5. Re:Didn't read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They'd also be dead in 4 hours.

    6. Re:Didn't read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod up fools, that was funny

    7. Re:Didn't read the article... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      10 psi isn't fatal! Maybe a bit uncomfortable, but you're not gonna croak outright.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    8. Re:Didn't read the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Paris Hilton in a low-g environment... now that does sound like a good way to spend my powerball payout.

      Something tells me that Paris Hilton charges much, much more than $10 for an evening of sex with her.

    9. Re:Didn't read the article... by zelphior · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not even all that uncomfortable. IIRC, NASA originally planned on only pressurizing space capsules to around 5psi or pure oxygen. This is the same as the partial pressure of oxygen in our atmosphere, so the astronots didn't get high on O2 or anything. That's why the Apollo 1 fire was so bad.

      Of course, I think the ISS uses normal 14.7psi of normal earth air, so they'd have to make the air a lot more Oxygen rich if there was a leak. Anyways, just my 2 cents.

      Can't remember any sources exactly, so feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

      --
      If you can read this then I forgot to check "Post Anonymously"
    10. Re:Didn't read the article... by isomeme · · Score: 1

      A bigger leak would definitely be easier to find. For a medium-sized leak (the kind that would drain the station over the course of a day or two), the sound would be loud and easy to find; most likely a whistling, rushing sound.

      For a very large leak, just look for the impact damage where equipment and bodies slammed hardest against the surrounding hull sections.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
    11. Re:Didn't read the article... by HeghmoH · · Score: 4, Informative

      A small correction on the Apollo 1 fire. The fire hazard from low-pressure pure oxygen is comparable to the fire hazard from a full-pressure atmospheric mix. I believe there are physiological effects to low-pressure oxygen that make it less desirable.

      What happened with Apollo 1 is that it was supposed to use low-pressure pure oxygen in flight. However, on the ground, they couldn't do that because the capsule was only meant to take pressure pushing out. If they had used low-pressure oxygen on the ground, it would have been crushed by the outside air. So they just increased the pressure. Oxygen at 3psi is ok, but oxygen at 16psi is an incredible fire hazard. Fire starts, everybody dies.

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    12. Re:Didn't read the article... by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Other space news sources (like Spaceflight Now) mention the fact that the leakage was already known late last year, dec 29 IIRC. Maybe your parent knew that. Then again, that still makes it less than half a month.

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    13. Re:Didn't read the article... by Eraser_ · · Score: 1

      ...explosive bolts dont go off... O2 doesn't get vented to the atmosphere where the fire would be pushed out the door along with its intense heat. Water poured in, astronauts out.

    14. Re:Didn't read the article... by MerlynEmrys67 · · Score: 1
      From an article - 14.0 PSI is the approximate atmospheric pressure in Oklahoma City. You can go way below that in cities such as Denver.

      The problem that they run into is that the atmospheric contaminant monitor was only rated down to 13.9 PSI... And trust me - you don't want to push engineering limits in an environment like space

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them
    15. Re:Didn't read the article... by gerardlt · · Score: 1

      ...on the moon... ...0-Gravity sex...

      Erm, last time I was at the beach, it looked like the moon still had a gravitational pull!

      --
      /* This sig is disabled. Press CTRL-W to enable. Thankyou */
    16. Re:Didn't read the article... by tiger99 · · Score: 1
      That is absolutely correct. Even human flesh will burn in pure oxygen, despite the water content, as will many metals and most plastics.

      It is interesting that the fire hazard rises rapidly just above the normal atmospheric partial pressure, which is the optimum for organic life as we know it. But, as you imply, you can take away the nitrogen and the odd bit of Argon and CO2 without tangible effect.

      I never did understand how the crew were supposed to cope with breathing a full atmosphere of oxygen anyway, it affects the brain amongst other things, and would surely impair the crew's ability to function very seriously, as they would be grossly hyper-ventilated. There is a word for that, but I can't remember it right now, anyway it is not a nice sensation at all, a bit like being drunk. I sniffed nominally pure oxygen once to see what would happen, not an experience worth repeating. I suspect that most people who have used welding equipment have had a sniff out of curiosity, a trick not to be tried with the acetylene!

  4. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by BaronAaron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Destiny was designed and made in the US.

  5. Damn... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was looking forward to watching the ISS sputter around the sky like a deflating balloon with a couple astronaughts hanging on for dear life and screaming bloody murder.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    1. Re:Damn... by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny
      I was looking forward to watching the ISS sputter around the sky like a deflating balloon

      Not me. I'm just hoping they don't drop a sturgeon on my car.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Damn... by PhilippeT · · Score: 1

      O Tom you find everythink sick... although i for once aggree.

      --
      A psychopath can't tell the difference between right and wrong. A sociopath knows the difference - he just doesn't care.
    3. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And in other news, President Bush's head is reported to not be leaking air, but continuing to expand at an alarming rate.

    4. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's sick, Tom, is your unrepentant MANHAM CANNING.

    5. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush is going to kill off the ISS in his Mars speech anyway.

    6. Re:Damn... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      Ok, please explain the joke. I've seen a couple refences and google just returns lots and lots of hits on russian caviar

  6. To paraphrase... by technomom · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's one small step for duct tape, one giant leap for mankind.

    1. Re:To paraphrase... by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Best. Tech. Joke. EVAR!

      --
      C|N>K
    2. Re:To paraphrase... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

      In the future, maybe all spacecraft will first be pre-filled with this stuff

    3. Re:To paraphrase... by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Actually, they removed the hose. They didn't duct tape it.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    4. Re:To paraphrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only all men were as brilliant as you must be

    5. Re:To paraphrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice reply TECHNOMOM, you aids infected whore

    6. Re:To paraphrase... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone is paranoid :-P

    7. Re:To paraphrase... by shachart · · Score: 1

      "ISS, this is Houston, you can stop farting now. We have fixed the leak"
      "Roger that Houston, the smell started to get horrible. Especially with the red bean vacuum-packs...."

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, consult.
    8. Re:To paraphrase... by technomom · · Score: 1

      Anonymous. Coward.

  7. pressure by marshall_j · · Score: 5, Funny

    some equipment on the ISS is only certified to operate above a certain air pressure.

    such as the crew maybe?

    1. Re:pressure by maharg · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, nothing that critical - just the air monitor - Doh !

      --

      $ strings FTP.EXE | grep Copyright
      @(#) Copyright (c) 1983 The Regents of the University of California.
    2. Re:pressure by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 5, Informative
      Actually the crew could work normally until about 1/2 of an atmosphere. If the change is gradual enough, your body build up extra red-blood cells to compensate. Mountain climber in the Himalayas actually park at camp for about six weeks to 'acclimatize' to the reduced atmosphere.

      Most people would still need some bottled Oxygen to get up to the top of Everest though, at around 1/3 of an atmosphere. When the pressure gets that low, your body has trouble metabolizing fast enough to maintain temperature.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:pressure by camusflage · · Score: 4, Funny

      such as the crew maybe?

      I was told, second-hand, the story of a NASA contractor who was in a meeting with some NASA engineers. As all geeks should know, hard drives require air pressure to work (floating heads and all that). When the subject of a loss of air pressure on the ISS came up, one of the NASA engineers started talking about how all the experimental data would be lost because the HD's would fail. It wasn't until the contractor said "Uhhh, what about the crew?" that they had even entered folks' minds about being similarly sensitive to a loss of air pressure.

      --
      The truth about Scientology, Xenu, and you: Operation Clambake
    4. Re:pressure by Xandu · · Score: 1

      One thing that requires very close to atmospheric pressure is hard drives. The heads float above the platter utilizing the bernouli principle. If the pressure too high, the heads get pulled down onto the platter (bad). If the pressure is too low, the heads don't get sucked down close enough, and data can't be read or written with any reliability.

      For reference, look at the environmental specifications of any hard drive to see what pressures (often expressed in altitude above sea level) can operate under.

      I work on a balloon based scientific experiment (specifically BLAST ) where the atmosphere is about 1/100th the pressure down here (altitude about 125,000 feet above sea level). We fly several computers onboard, and many are in pressure vessels soley to keep the hard drives happy. (We use some flash drives, but when our flights can easily be 2 weeks long and we produce about 11.5 Gbytes/day of binary data, we need a decent amount of storage).

      --


      --Xandu
    5. Re:pressure by tmortn · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, just the fact the crew is 'rated' to lower pressures for operation. There is a flight reg for a repress to 14.4 psia if the pressure drops to 13.9. The 13.9 is not the crew danger redline. There are several pieces of equipment on board that have the lower pressure operational limit set at 13.9... ie thats as low as they are certified to work with no problem. at 13.95 or so they start to be powered down in case the pressure continues to drop.

      The reason is due to thermal buildup. Without gravity you have no coreolis effect, most commonly recognised as the idea that hot air rises. In ziggy hot air does not rise it just gets hot, thus you have to have thermal transfer by contact of some sort, IE air blowing or contact with a heatsink ( water loop ) etc... which is the reason for those huge radiators on the station.

      At lower pressure there is less thermal transfer with the air which means greater heat buildup in the electronics could cause a problem or possibly an unrecoverable malfunction.

      Genrenally speaking these limits are VERY CAUTIOUS. Much of the equipment has no redundancy and could only be replaced by flying it up from the ground... something very difficult to manage payload scheduling wise even if shuttle were making flights and next to impossible with Soyuz/Progress launches. Thus you don't risk even the possibility of an equipment failure even though much of the equipment would likely operate just fine in near vacume conditions.

      To have an idea regarding crew limits consider the fact suit pressure for EVA's is 4.3-5 psia, the new hard suit concept allows for 8.3 ( no pre-breathing ). Either consisting of an environment which could be created in very short order on the station. Of course this requires shifting the concentration of oxygen... close to 100% in the case of the 4.3 I belive, which is dangerous. The 8psia range requires ~32psia which is only a few percentage points above nominal environment on the station.

      Thus the pressure drop at that slow of a rate presented a far more immediate danger to the equipment than it did to the crew. The crew was not worried nor were the flight control teams worried about the crew for the simple reason the crew was as yet not in any immidiate danger as it would have taken weeks at the recorded rate of loss to place the crew in danger just had they not undertaken to replace what was lost... they also have plenty of spare oxygen to add and thus it would have taken months for this leak to depleat stores to the point where the crew would have been at risk.

      The engineers didn't have the head in the clouds or no concern for the Crew. Crew safety on the station takes precedent over EVERYTHING else.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    6. Re:pressure by tmortn · · Score: 1

      dought... 8psia requires 32% oxygen, not 32psia oxygen.. and I used preview, silly me.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    7. Re:pressure by delcielo · · Score: 5, Informative

      The truth is that above around 26,000 feet there is no amount of acclimatization that will compensate for the diminished oxygen/pressure. That's why they call it the "Dead Zone;" because essentially, you're dying. What happens is your cells start to deteriorate, becoming unable to contain fluids. Your brain starts to swell from the uncontrolled fluid buildup (High Altitude Cerebral Edema). Your lungs begin to do the same (High Altitude Pulmonary Edema). The only fix is oxygen and pressure.

      When you get above around 30,000 feet, you start running into funny little things like needing the air/oxygen forced into you with positive pressure, rather than the kind of "on-demand" oxygen setups that are commonly used. If I remember correctly, this is related to pressure; but is not the same issue that you get with pressure higher up, where you're worried about the blood's ability to contain its nitrogen, and thus, about the blood boiling.

      Scary stuff.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    8. Re:pressure by Flingles · · Score: 1

      50 atmospheres of pressure?! Professor, how many atmospheres was the ship made to withstand!
      Well, considering it's a spaceship.........ZERO!

      --
      Karma: -2^0.5 . Mainly due to the imbibing of dihydrogen monoxide
    9. Re:pressure by tho+1234 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just to nitpick, the coriolis effect has absolutely nothing to do with gravity or rising gases. Its a "fictious force" that occurs as a result of observations taken in a rotating (ie not an inertial system) reference frame, such as the rotating earth. In everyday life, you do not experience any coriolis effect; if you did you would be aware that the earth is rotating under you- Instead, you're probably confusing the coriolis effect on global mases of air, which results in circulation cells that span vast distances... What you're describing, the fact that hot air rises, is simply due to the difference in density of the heated gas, ie basic fluid mechanics.

    10. Re:pressure by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "that they had even entered folks' minds about being similarly sensitive to a loss of air pressure."

      The crew knows how to get into the Soyuz capsule all by themselves.

    11. Re:pressure by Urkki · · Score: 1
      • where you're worried about the blood's ability to contain its nitrogen, and thus, about the blood boiling.

      I think that's only issue when pressure goes lower rapidly. As long as pressure goes low slowly enough, the nitrogen can get out of the blood slowly, and you avoid those potentially lethal nitrogen bubbles in the blood.

      It's same thing with diving, professional divers sometimes stay in high pressure for days (either at the bottom of a sea, or resting in a pressure chamber), then when the work is done they're slowly (over many days) returned to normal pressure so the extra nitrogen in their blood goes out with normal breathing, instead of forming bubbles.
    12. Re:pressure by tmortn · · Score: 1

      Damned public school science !!!! Yes of course your right..

      http://zebu.uoregon.edu/~js/glossary/coriolis_ef fe ct.html

      Hot air rising affected by the coriolis effect creates weather. Our teacher used a demonstration with a pot of water and stated the forces at work with the water boiling was the coriolis effect.... DOUGHT !!! Or perhaps I wasn't paying very close attention, actually I rather hope that was the case.

      Thanks for the clarification.

      --
      I don't ask you to be me. I only ask you not expect me to be you.
    13. Re:pressure by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I would like to point out that divers staying under the water for days aren't using the regular compressed air like a sport diver would use. Breathing too high a partial pressure of Oxygen for too long is poisonous. They generally breath a Helium/O2 mixture. Helium doesn't dissolve as readily into the blood stream, and thus doesn't bubble like Nitrogen while at the same time it does a dandy job of displacing Oxygen.

      If you have heard of Nitrox, it is simply (HAH!) an artificial re-combination of N2 and O2, sometimes with an inert gases. Don't know enough about it myself, I'm an air-breather. Hell, I still dive with a wet-suit.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    14. Re:pressure by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Convection, no?

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  8. right in the nick of time...i guess. by therealcaf · · Score: 2, Informative

    according to the article
    The station's air pressure had dropped from the normal 14.7 psi to 14.0 psi. NASA have emphasised that the crew's health was not in danger, but some onboard equipment, including an air monitor, is only certified for use above 13.9 psi
    it would seem that things were pretty close. but keeping in mind that it was only losing .03 psi per day it doesnt seem that serious. they would have had 33 more days to find it atleast.

    --

    -caf
    1. Re:right in the nick of time...i guess. by CrazyTalk · · Score: 3, Informative

      better check your math - in 33 days they would be down to 13.0 psi.

    2. Re:right in the nick of time...i guess. by therealcaf · · Score: 0

      good call. hey, i never claimed to be good at math.

      --

      -caf
    3. Re:right in the nick of time...i guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you using an old Pentium for your calcuations, or do you just work for NASA? They'd be down to 13.01 psi thank you very much! :)

    4. Re:right in the nick of time...i guess. by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      ... says the Comic Book Guy.

  9. No better time? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "The news couldn't have come at a better time," mission control told the crew.
    This is the kind of thing that makes no sense and must just be there to meet the word count requirements. Here are some "better times" that this could have come: Yesterday, two days ago, the day the leak was discovered.
    --
    I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
    1. Re:No better time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another victory for the ISS, where science is barely practiced, and maintenance is the top job! Huzzah!

    2. Re:No better time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a phrase used in the English language that means "just in the nick of time," or "at the last possible second." It isn't meant to be interpereted literally, kind of like peanut-better isn't butter with peanuts in it.

      Whats insightful here?

    3. Re:No better time? by WebMasterJoe · · Score: 1
      this is a phrase used in the English language that means "just in the nick of time," or "at the last possible second." It isn't meant to be interpereted literally, kind of like peanut-better isn't butter with peanuts in it.
      What? I think that people who write articles are only supposed to use words that have meaning. I'm going to make a guess that you don't write professionally, as anybody who had the gall to charge for their writing would not say something like that. "Oh, those are just words..."
      Homer: [singing off-key] Ee-van eht niojh -- you gotta love that crazy chorus.
      Lisa: What does it mean?
      Homer: Ah, it doesn't mean anything. It's like, "rama-lama-ding-dong," or, "Give peace a chance."
      --
      I really hate signatures, but go to my website.
  10. Be honset now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    the leak was really Carl Rove, right?

    1. Re:Be honset now... by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      the leak was really Carl Rove, right?

      You mean Karl Rove. There's a K instead of the usual C.

    2. Re:Be honset now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's more insulting if you can't be bothered to spell their name right.

      Egad, I didn't realize he was a Texan, too. You folks have a lot to answer for.

  11. Leak found, fixed by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Booo-ring.

    Now, had the leak been in a non-American-made part of the space station, I could have made a funny!

    Remember, kids: it's not about being the best, it's about making fun of everybody else.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  12. Re:To the Moon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    <blockquote>where can you go after you've been to the moon? </blockquote>

    Well, you can always try to get into the... Paris Hilton!!

    But seriously folks, I'll be here all week.

    Try the veal.

  13. Vaguely apropos by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm reminded of a recent "Freefall" (web comic).

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  14. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow almost everything they produce either has or makes holes.

  15. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    > Destiny was designed and made in the US.

    Fine. We'll fire all the foreigners who helped, and we'll make a new one.

    We'll call it... Destiny's Child!

    I'll be here all week.

    Tip your waitress.

  16. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but the hose was made in China.

  17. Special thanks to McGyver.... by eggoeater · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...for telling the crew how to fix the leak using a roofing nail, some hair spray, and a roll of toilet paper.
    The crew said they'd get right on it as soon as those supplies were delivered.

    --
    Generic Sig: End communication.

    1. Re:Special thanks to McGyver.... by marktoml · · Score: 0, Redundant

      No, no...a Swiss Army knife and duct tape.

    2. Re:Special thanks to McGyver.... by Wakkow · · Score: 1

      What will they do now that they've used up all the toilet paper?

    3. Re:Special thanks to McGyver.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that's what the three shells were for.

  18. Water Test by Wun+Hung+Lo · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess it wouldn't have been practical to dip the whole station in a tub of water.

    1. Re:Water Test by *weasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hollywood told me that even Tim Robbins could locate this kind of problem in under a minute with 1 Dr Pepper-in-a-bag.

      I'm frankly shocked that the reality isn't how it was presented.

      --
      // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    2. Re:Water Test by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Funny
      I suppose they keep a case of Dr. Pepper on hand for the occasion.

      What's the going rate to get a Kilogram in orbit?

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    3. Re:Water Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its paid for by the Dr. Pepper product placement licence.

    4. Re:Water Test by theslashdude · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You joke, but they do have a full mock-up of the space station in a tub of water. It's called the EVA Pool and is used for training astronauts for space walks.

    5. Re:Water Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I guess it wouldn't have been practical to dip the whole station in a tub of water."

      Which direction would the bubbles go?

    6. Re:Water Test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still better than my idea of using a pressure-test. That'll find the station's weak spot!

      Of course, don't come to me if the test blows a hole in the side of the space station.

  19. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, but it was fereners WITHING the US
    You know...like people who's ancestors were from feren countries like England, Ireland, Germany, etc.
    Yeah... If Destiny was only made by Native American Indians it wouldn't have leaked.
    yeah whatever.

  20. Re:To the Moon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG! I was only 9 years old at the time, and while I remember the show, I had forgotten what it was called. Wasn't there an episode where they salvaged "Sputnik"? Wow! Thanks for helping me re-live a fond memory.

  21. Kent Brockman reports on the incident... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The spacecraft has apparently been taken over - "conqured" if you will - by a master race of giant space ants. It's difficult to tell from this vantage point whether they will consume the captive earth men or merely enslave them. One thing is for certain: there is no stopping them; the ants will soon be here. And I for one welcome our new insect overlords. I'd like to remind them that as a trusted TV personality I could be helpful in rounding up others to toil in their underground sugar caves." - Kent Brockman

    1. Re:Kent Brockman reports on the incident... by antdude · · Score: 1

      Muahaha, I am the overlord of ants. Bow to me!

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  22. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > If Destiny was only made by Native American Indians it wouldn't have leaked.

    You ever tried to breathe through buffalo skin?

    That shiat's air-tight!

    Crazy Horse on teh spoke!!!

  23. Sturgeon by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I thought it was because those Russians left the door open after they argued over the sturgeon and tossed it out.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Sturgeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theodore Sturgeon?

    2. Re:Sturgeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of the ISS is crap.

    3. Re:Sturgeon by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Don't you mean carp?

      GTRacer
      - SSSSSSSSsSsSsssss...*gasp*

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
  24. If you smell gas... by alexatrit · · Score: 1

    Childhood advice gone awry on Destiny: if you smell gas or hear a hissing noise, get out of the house.

    --

    Nothing but the finest in meaningless drivel
    1. Re:If you smell gas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell gas, but that's probably because I had enchiladas for lunch.

  25. Equalizing? by Tebriel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sounds more like it was trying to equalize pressure between the space station and the vaccuum outside...

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  26. The real hero? by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's hear it for the inanimate carbon rod!

    CB

    1. Re:The real hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      in Rod we trust!

  27. American Equipment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See... they should have outsourced the QA work. Cost cutting on QA would mean death.

  28. Re:weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, that depends....do you have a girlfriend? If you do, watch out!

  29. Windows? by skinfitz · · Score: 3, Funny

    The hose was used to equalize pressure and eliminate fog between two panes of a window.

    So.. someone left a window open?

    1. Re:Windows? by ElGuapoGolf · · Score: 2, Funny


      Not quite, but as someone with some experience in the matter, I can guarantee you that somehow, someway, GM (General Motors) had a hand in this.

      Don't believe me? Drive an older GM car thru a carwash, and watch that window sealant leak.

    2. Re:Windows? by SmurfButcher+Bob · · Score: 1

      I wanna know if they had to reboot after applying this patch...

      --

      help me i've cloned myself and can't remember which one I am

    3. Re:Windows? by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Well, no... but it's certainly not the first time that windows leak resources... ...space intentionally left blank for groans...

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    4. Re:Windows? by addaon · · Score: 3, Funny

      I sympathize. I used to have a '68 volvo with a built-in shower.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    5. Re:Windows? by twentycavities · · Score: 2

      My 1990 Pontiac Sunbird has a leaky sunroof. I can't decide what my favorite thing about that is:
      * That is dumps water on the top of my head while I'm trying to drive.
      * Dumps water on my lap so it looks like I peed my pants.
      * When the resulting moisture inside the car ends up on the inside of the windshield. Then freezes. Then when I scrape it off it's like it snowed in my car.

      Umm...thanks for listening.

      --
      Monstromart: Where shopping is a baffling ordeal
    6. Re:Windows? by lostchicken · · Score: 1

      We really need a (+1 Uphill both ways) pity moderation.

      --
      -twb
  30. Cracking the hatch ;) by Cat_Byte · · Score: 4, Funny
    From the original story of the launch:

    CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. - The $1.4 billion U.S. Destiny lab opened for business at the International Space Station Sunday, cracking the hatch on a new era of scientific discovery that one day could lead to human expeditions beyond Earth orbit.

    Heh...cracking the hatch....leak...funny.

    --
    Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
  31. another link with more details by mzs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is another good article from The Austrailian with more details. The pressure rose from 13.92 psi to 14.11 psi when the leak was sealed.

  32. Taking a leak.. by lionchild · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The only thing on a space station that should leak, are its crew!

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  33. What everyone really wants to know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, did they plug the hole with an inanimate carbon rod?

  34. How they fixed the leak? by b0lt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Did they jettison half of the space station, or use bubble gum instead?

    --
    got sig?
    1. Re:How they fixed the leak? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They used gum: http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/01/07/space.sta tion.ap/

  35. Repressurize by phorm · · Score: 1

    I'm just wondering when they can repressurize the station? After all, even with the leak fixed it wouldn't be a great idea to leave it with the lower pressure.

  36. Another day- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 4, Funny

    another IIS leaked fixed... ...oh wait...

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:Another day- by Igloodude · · Score: 1

      So will duct tape work as a patch for IIS memory leaks, too?

      --
      We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
    2. Re:Another day- by Wog · · Score: 1

      Duct tape covering over the power supply fan could.

  37. They fixed it using... by damien_kane · · Score: 0, Redundant

    an inanimate carbon rod!!!

    I can see it now... crowds of people parading down the streets chanting 'In Rod We Trust' and 'Long Live the Rod!!'

    err... wait... didn't I see that before?

    Maybe 'All your rod are belong to us'?

  38. Other leaks by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Did they find the money leak that put this thing way over budget?

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  39. Ho's? by Aardpig · · Score: 0

    The hose was used to equalize pressure and eliminate fog between two panes of a window.

    That's a pretty inhumane way to treat ladies of the oldest profession!

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  40. The lesson here? by ZipR · · Score: 5, Funny

    When aboard the space station, use Scotch brand magic transparent tape to affix photos of loved ones to the wall. NEVER EVER EVER use push pins, even Scotch brand magic push pins.

  41. Could be a software issue... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 3, Funny

    • Dave Open the pod bay doors, HAL.
      HAL I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that.
      Dave What's the problem?


    CB
  42. Speaking of duct tape... by hcg50a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I saw a Cops rerun over the weekend. They were dealing with an alligator on the loose. They called in a couple of alligator trappers, and guess what they used to clamp the alligator's jaw?

    Duct tape.

    When my wife saw that, she laughed and remarked that duct tape can fix anything.

    --
    HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
    11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
    1. Re:Speaking of duct tape... by beebware · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can hold an alligator's jaw shut with an elastic/rubber band. Their "opening" jaw muscles are quite weak - but their closing ones ouch!

    2. Re:Speaking of duct tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can keep anything shut with an elastic/rubber band. It just depends on the size of the elastic/rubber band.

  43. Re:bad comms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nobody laughed

  44. Re:weird by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Yeah. I met her last night. Her name's Lorena. I forget her last name, though.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  45. Attention astronauts! by S.I.O. · · Score: 4, Funny

    *Don't* forget to reapply the patch after the next ISS service pack!

  46. Another Patch by Linus+Sixpack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just another memorable leak, found and patched. Good thing it wasn't in one of the windows, they'd have to relaunch the space station. :) ls

  47. 14.0 PSI? by kscguru · · Score: 4, Informative
    Normal pressure is 14.7 PSI. They are concerned at 14.0 PSI. Their equipment is not rated to work at 13.9 PSI.

    Guesstimating from some info here, Denver, CO is ~12 PSI. A tall mountain in the US is ~10 PSI at the top.

    Lousy, cheap NASA equipment! It wouldn't work down here on Earth anyways.

    --

    A witty [sig] proves nothing. --Voltaire

    1. Re:14.0 PSI? by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 1
      Normal pressure is 14.7 PSI. They are concerned at 14.0 PSI. Their equipment is not rated to work at 13.9 PSI.

      There's a difference between "not rated to work at..." and "won't work at...". Think lawyers and ass-covering...

      --

      - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

    2. Re:14.0 PSI? by sexylicious · · Score: 1

      ALL Russian made space components are specified to be sealed and have 1 atmosphere of pressure inside them. Don't ask me why. It's how the Russians do things.

    3. Re:14.0 PSI? by User8201 · · Score: 1

      Really? I seem to remember you're right, that some probe Russia sent (and crashed) onto the Moon had 1atm in it despite it being unmanned, but why do they do that? And for sattelites too?

      Strange...

    4. Re:14.0 PSI? by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Easy. Just shut the door on the sat on the ground. Launch. Instant 1 atm pressurisation. (as long as there is no leak...)No intent there, just good seals. (urk, urk...fish!) *sorry*

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    5. Re:14.0 PSI? by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      ....not how, but why?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    6. Re:14.0 PSI? by hplasm · · Score: 1

      Since the cold war, everyone in the USSR got used to everything being airtight. Alibies, reputations, satellite doors, etc. Just in case the KGB was checking... :0)

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  48. No spare hoses on the station?! by Cthefuture · · Score: 1

    A replacement hose may be flown up to the station later in January on a Progress vehicle.

    Egads, not even a spare hose. I guess it's a non-critical part but it still seems kinda lame.

    It would be common sense that many of the hoses on various equipment would be the same. Then you'd have a bunch of spare hoses to repair all sorts of things. Or maybe I'm not thinking enough like an engineer.

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
    1. Re:No spare hoses on the station?! by shotfeel · · Score: 1

      No spare hoses until they finish building the garage.

    2. Re:No spare hoses on the station?! by tommck · · Score: 1
      Yeah... after being in the space station for a few months, I'm sure they could all use a couple spare ho's... oh wait... never mind...

      --
      ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  49. So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think it's interesting that initially the Americans tried to point the finger of possibility at just about anything capable of leaking built by the Russians, who of course have a zillion more years of experience building these things than we do...

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Components. American components, Russian Components, ALL MADE IN TAIWAN!!!

    2. Re:So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by Igloodude · · Score: 1

      And also interesting that the Russians claimed the leak had 'stabilized' while NASA stated that the pressure was still dropping - the Russians also have a few zillion years of public denials/minimalizations of disasters, right?

      --
      We now return you to your regularly scheduled thread.
    3. Re:So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by FreeUser · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's interesting that initially the Americans tried to point the finger of possibility at just about anything capable of leaking built by the Russians, who of course have a zillion more years of experience building these things than we do...

      References?

      I recall both sides saying they had no idea where the problem was and that they were looking for it. I don't recall anyone placing any blame ahead of time, except perhaps for some slashdot trolls.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    4. Re:So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by n-baxley · · Score: 1

      Considering the number of "minor" problems they've had during those "zillion" years, I would point the finger at them as well.

    5. Re:So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Actually several Russian components where mentioned including some type of air scrubber that the Russians fortunately had a spare on-board, as well as seals between several of the Russian modules...

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    6. Re:So... It wasn't Russian equipment after all! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They actually checked the American module first, before the Russian one.

      The valves on the U.S. side of the space station checked out fine, Foale said. The men then turned their attention to the valves inside the Russian compartments and also the Russian cargo ship docked to the complex. Reference

  50. Would it be feasable.. by MasterSLATE · · Score: 1

    to pump some harmless/oderless colored gas through the station to just see where it was spewing out of? Their hightech tools, although they did work, are still not 100% fool proof.

    Neither is my idea, but hey, how long would it take to run a colored gas through and then clear it out? A few hours maybe? I don't know. What do you think?

    --

    [sig]www.masterslate.org[/sig]
    1. Re:Would it be feasable.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, fill the station up with a stinky smell then go outside and sniff about until they find where it is leaking out.

  51. Feed the crew beans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All that farting will soon bring the air pressure back up!

  52. Life fails to imitate art by McD · · Score: 1
    Fixed it, huh?

    Guess they won't be Sucking Vacuum after all.

    Peace,
    -McD

    --
    "Given the pace of technology, I propose we leave math to the machines and go play outside." -- Calvin
  53. "originally mentioned" by zontroll · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The leak was originally mentioned on Slashdot a few days back."


    I'm sure NASA is thanking the slashdot community for being the "original" source of the leak information.

  54. Uh.. by Remlik · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else find the last paragraph of that article a bit scary?

    "The leak was made more worrisome because the main oxygen generator, which has been working only sporadically, failed again last week. Russian flight managers are designing a way to fix it this week with spare parts already on the station."

    Shouldn't the OXYGEN generators be...oh I dunno...WORKING most of the time? Failed again last week reminds me of the infamous furnace fighting scene from a Christmas Story.

    I can just see a Russian cosmonaut banging on it with a wrench cursing...

    --
    Apple free since 1990!
    1. Re:Uh.. by PhuCknuT · · Score: 1

      He said the MAIN one was broken. They have backups.

  55. If only Harry Potter was there... by TopShelf · · Score: 1

    So where are the animated carbon rods, then?

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  56. At least nasa got the units right... by bucky0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Otherwise:
    Engineer 1: We're leaking .03psi of air per day.

    Engineer 2: (thinking in head: hmmm, there's 1,418,550.14 pascals of air) What's the big deal? we have 129,000 years untill the air's all gone. Tell the astronauts to not worry about it.

    Engineer 1: Makes sense to me. Let's get coffee.

    --

    -Bucky
  57. Oh dear... by locutus_borg · · Score: 0

    The leak was made more worrisome because the main oxygen generator, which has been working only sporadically, failed again last week. Russian flight managers are designing a way to fix it this week with spare parts already on the station.

    That... is just great.

    --
    - It is easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them. - Alfred Adler -
  58. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by dave420 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nazi.

  59. Mothball it by Apostata · · Score: 1

    You know you have a white elephant when the only news you hear are technical problems.

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
  60. Re:Damn... OSR by outcast36 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is in reference to Simpsons episode CABF03 The Great Money Caper.

    Mir cosmonauts throw the sturgeon from the station in a fit of rage.... Read more here.

    insert russian profanities

  61. O2 on Everest is sort of a Catch-22 (OT) by caveat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was reading a good page on low-pressure physiology (had to do witk HALO skydiving) where they did the calculations and figured out you're about equally screwed with or without O2 on Everest - if you don't bring O2, you're naturally sluggish and slow, but if you do, you have a hard time getting enough extra energy to make up for the extra weight you have to carry. There is a "sweet spot", but go very far outside of it and you might as well just breathe the thin air.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:O2 on Everest is sort of a Catch-22 (OT) by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      I thought that was what Sherpas were for. The "sweet spot" you mention is to load up Tonga with 100 lbs of O2 and suck that stuff down until you hyper-ventailate.

  62. It's comforting to know that... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

    ...even 133t coders at NASA forget to delete[]!

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  63. Thomas Crapper's Law by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    99% of everything is sturgeon.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  64. For those of you unable to receive the audio by Anonymous+Cowabunga · · Score: 2, Funny

    transmission, here it is: "pssssssssssss..."

  65. rofl by TheOv3rminD · · Score: 0

    well they were probably too busy patching M$ windows to notice they had a leak. (in case you dont know they run microsoft windows on ISS) probably ist the first time windows almost killed someone.......lol

  66. Could have been much worse by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1
    The first crew of the Salyut 1 space station were returning on Soyuz 11 when a pressure equalization failed - possibly because of the shock of the explosive bolts that separated them from the station. That one must have been a much faster leak, since they only had a chance to get it closed half way before they died. Yeah, the leak in this case wasn't anything drastic, but how much air was that valve capable of releasing? How much time would the crew have had to either fix it or abandon the station if it had opened all the way? Why did it leak in the first place? The $1 valves in my car's tires don't leak - you'd think space station valves would be of somewhat higher quality.

  67. Re: How much time to escape . . . by shubert1966 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe I'm wrong, but I seem to remember that when the last shuttle disaster occured, there was no contingency for docking with the Space Station in case of trouble. That itself seems like a HUGE design flaw. I hope this is wrong, because it would mean that the shuttle could not rescue people trapped on the Space Station either.

    Is it true that only spacewalks and cargo transfers occur between these two specific orbitals?
    Yeah, a manned-mission to Mars is looking more feasible every day . . .

    "HAL . . ."
    "Yes Dave."
    "We're screwed - Set the controls for the heart of the sun."

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  68. Re:Uh..Oxygen generator?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a problem with the idea of Oxygen 'generators'. How do they work? Adding a few neutrons and electrons to some Nitrogen atoms?
    Or maybe they just synthesise material Oxygen atoms from pure energy?

    Imho the article should have said "Oxygen supplies", or perhaps meant CO2 scrubbers (lithium-hydride? filters). Afaik there's no such thing as an Oxygen generator that doesn't involve biotech (plant photosynthesis) in some way.

  69. Built by Americans, Fixed by Foreigners by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Interesting
    US mission commander Michael Foale and flight engineer Alexander Kaleri repaired the crack soon after it was discovered in the US module early on Monday, the officials told news agencies.
    Michael Foale: considers Cambridge, England to be his hometown & came to the U.S. in '83
    Alexander Yurievich Kaleri: Special Honors: Hero of the Russian Federation
    [Insert Soviet Russia Jokes Below]
    --
    [Fuck Beta]
    o0t!
    1. Re:Built by Americans, Fixed by Foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Built by Americans" HINT: ISS is an acronym for International Space Station.

    2. Re:Built by Americans, Fixed by Foreigners by TubeSteak · · Score: 1
      The broken part AKA the "Destiny Module" was built by Boeing. Not
      that the Russians wouldn't use a name like destiny, but its in fitting with
      the general NASA theme. Discovery, Challenger, Endevour, Destiny, etc...
      Oh, and if it wasn't US made... why is its name in English? The Brits made it?

      http://space.about.com/cs/iss/a/iss.htm:
      "U.S.-ow ned, Russian-built Zarya control module"
      "U.S.-built Unity connecting module"
      "The Russian-provided crew living quarters, Zvevda (Russian for Star)"
      "The first mission of the twenty-first century, in February, 2001, had
      Atlantis and her crew deliver the US Destiny Laboratory Module"
      "Additional modules installed include 2 Multi-Purpose Logistics Modules:
      Leonardo and Raffaello, the station's robot arm, called the Space Station
      Remote Manipulator, the station's joint airlock, and finally, the Russian
      Docking Compartment, known as Pirs (Russian for pier)."

      Part of the funding boondoggle known as the ISS was that most of the
      International contributors were having a bit of trouble putting up the money
      needed to get things built.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  70. Some Equipment... by ari_j · · Score: 2, Funny

    some equipment on the ISS is only certified to operate above a certain air pressure

    Yeah. For example, my lungs are only certified to operate above a certain air pressure.

  71. Putting some thought behind this by becker · · Score: 5, Informative

    With reduced pressure, the thermal capacity of the cooling air is proportionally reduced. Combined with changes in forced air flow and microgravity not creating convectional cooling, you can have long-term overheating issues with equipment that consumes very little power.

    This is solved on satellites with conductive cold/hot plates, but that results in much heavier equipment.

    Regarding leakage rates, it's very difficult to estimate leak flow rates. The flow might be proportional to pressure squared, or cubed. If it's in an elastic seal, it may completely re-seal when the pressure drops to a specific level.

    Humans can function at elevations of about 5psi (see the other posts about mountain climbers), and survive on a little less. Since O2 is less than 20% of the atmosphere, you can theoretically live on 1psi of pure O2. But secondary effects are killers at that low pressure, such as keeping enough moisture in the lung tissue. When near-pure O2 is used, it is usually at about 3psi or nearly the partial pressure of O2 at sea level.

  72. NASA wins again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    And I guess those rocket scientists didn't think of that before endangering lives and billions of dollars of equiptment?

    Maybe they should have used nitrogen or helium to up the partial pressure as needed?!!

    SILLY ASSES.

  73. Space Station changelog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    changelog

    2004012 08:37
    * [patch] leak found in a hose in the Destiny lab module
    * [bug fix] Jeannie has recovered from the flu
    * [driver update] Marty is the new pilot

  74. Leak Finding Performance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The score is now:

    ISS 1
    White House 0

  75. Re:Uh..Oxygen generator?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a problem with the idea of carbon dioxide 'scrubbers'. How do they work? Do they have a little brush that actually scrubs eact CO2 molocule?

  76. Whoops by delcielo · · Score: 1

    I meant to post that under the "Everest catch-22" post.

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  77. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you failed to read the article, this product wasn't sucking...

  78. Gratuitous Family Guy Reference by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear MacGyver,

    Enclosed are a paper clip, a drinking straw, and a rubber band. Please save my dog.

    Peter Griffin

  79. Move along troll... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 0

    I find it funny that xenophobes like you used the original Slashdot story to engage in bashing Russia, Japan and the other international partners involved in the ISS.

    Isn't it amazing how, now that the leak has been shown to have come from a US-built module, none of those other morons have much to say about how "inferior" US standards have caused this problem whereas they were all so quick to jump on the foreigner-bashing bandwagon and condemn the "inferior" of Russia, etc as being the cause even before the leak was traced to its origin?

    Please, this shit isn't even funny. So can we cut the "inept Russians" jokes now?

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  80. Warning: Furry web comic! by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    I refer all readers to the Geek Heirarchy.

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
  81. D'oh by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    You probably missed the Simpsons episode where the sturgeon incident took place. Flame away!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  82. Re: How much time to escape . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all of the shuttles are/were unable to dock with the ISS, it was specifically the Columbia that couldn't because it was too large(heavy?).
    The rest of the fleet is fully capable of docking with the ISS.

  83. Re:Warning: Furry web comic! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, whatever dude. Anthropomorphs have been in sci-fi forever. Hello Chewbacca? Ewoks? Kzinti? The geek hierarchy is getting stale. ;pppp

  84. Re: How much time to escape . . . by lostchicken · · Score: 1

    Getting around in space isn't like getting around a subway system. You can't just jump orbits. You have to know where you're going, and go there at launch, when you're pouring the enormous impulse into the vehicle. The ISS is at a very high inclination orbit in order to be reached by both Russian and American launch facilities. This orbit is a very "expensive" one in terms of energy at launch. Which means less payload.

    Space is a very, very big place, and the shuttle (like any space vehicle that isn't mostly fuel) is just a big projectile. You shoot it very fast, very high, and just let it fall around the earth. It can't just pull up and meet with the station without a lot of fuel. You have to aim for it from the start.

    --
    -twb
  85. Dialogue after problem was fixed.... by Prince+Cyph0r · · Score: 0

    cosmonaut 1: You did it!
    cosmonaut 2: I did it? YES! YES! I did it! I am true Russain hero!!!

  86. Who owns space? Does nationality matter? by NKJensen · · Score: 1

    The whole nationalist issue is a sick idea which has caused many silly conflicts.

    Many of us have been working in more than one country, and that percentage is sure to increase with better transportation etc. Nationality is less and less important.

    E.g: Does it make me 1/39'th french that I've lived and worked a year in France?

    My brother worked a year in Hungary and his family lived there too, does this make his kids 1/6'th and 1/3'rd Hungarian?

    --
    -- From Denmark
  87. Re: How much time to escape . . . by shubert1966 · · Score: 1

    Thanks for that reply. I was told once that it was about $10,000 a pound to put stuff in orbit. What you relate as a need for much more fuel issues, in addition to precision issues, certainly drives the point home that these people ARE risking their lives a GREAT DEAL MORE than people such as myself realize.

    --
    Stuff that matters.
  88. Re:To the Moon! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1
    Then you'll like this:

    Link

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  89. Re:bet it was made by foreigners by dave420 · · Score: 1
    troll? Nazis.

    :-P

  90. Foale said on Mir his ears popped by hpulley · · Score: 1

    When the cargo ship crashed into Mir while testing automated docking routines, Michael Foale's ears popped from the falling air pressure. Leaks are much easier to find with rushing air and popping ears.

    It's like tires. When you have a blow-out, it is easy to see but a slow leak may go undetected for weeks until it overheats on that long trim to the relatives place for the holidays.

    --
    $#!^ happens, but why does it always have to happen to me???