Slashdot Mirror


Brine on Mars?

Bagels writes "A new article on MSNBC (coming originally from Space.com) reports that the both Rovers may have struck water in the form of brine. The Opportunity rover found hints of salty water in the trench that it dug, and scientists note that the Spirit rover is currently digging a trench of its own to investigate the soil that clings to its treads, suggesting the possibility of moisture. The brine would only be small amounts of water mixed with salt, which can exist in liquid form at very low temperatures. More images are available over at NASA's rover site." Reader frovingslosh would like to add: "I'm just hoping that when you get around to posting one of the many stories that the rover has found mud on Mars that you might include a link to the slashdot article where I predicted this but got moderated as 'funny'." Done!

333 comments

  1. This Just In: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    There is water on Mars. The ICE CAPS were first noticed about FOUR HUNDRED YEARS AGO.

    More breaking news as it becomes available. Thank you.

    1. Re:This Just In: by Tmack · · Score: 0, Informative
      Those ICE CAPS were thought to be CO2 Ice, not water ice. There is a big difference, mainly that CO2 is not H2O.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
    2. Re:This Just In: by CuriHP · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the ice caps have been known to be largely water ice for a while now. There was another story confirming it a few weeks ago. The real news here is liquid water.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
  2. Did someone say "brine?" by SYFer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Scientists now believe that advanced colonies of Sea Monkeys once inhabited Mars.

    --
    "...all the labours of the ages, all the devotion, all the inspiration, all the noonday brightness..." yada yada
    1. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by torpor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I for one welcome our new martian sea monkey overlords, and would like to remind them that, as a talented /. poster, i'm quite qualified to act as an intelligence resource in the Triops Wars which are inevitably on the horizon ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    2. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by Ragnarok21 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Brine? Who cares...now if they had discovered beer...

    3. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by first.last · · Score: 1, Funny

      Reminds me of the South Park episode where Cartman mixes sea men with semen and advance civilisations develop and nuke each other.

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    4. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by jmpnz · · Score: 1

      Damn, Beat me to the punch line! I should wake up earlier. You know how many years I have been waiting to make a sea-monkies joke!? Many, sigh.

    5. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We must now go to mars to liberate the sea monkeys from their Martian overlords and destroy their briney WMD, that can cause massive corrosion on American infrastructures.

    6. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by flewp · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you've been waiting years to make a sea-monkey joke, you should probably go back to sleep... for a very, very, very long time.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    7. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by guinsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Banjo!

    8. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by WeeLad · · Score: 1

      Simpsons did it.

      --
      Seriously, Don't take anything I say seriously.
    9. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If those rovers had an odour sensor we could
      clearly tell what it is - brine or martian piss.

    10. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by madpierre · · Score: 1

      Weird city. I've just bought a Triops World kit. Added H2O only this morning. I'll have to name the critters that hatch after features on the Martian surface.

      --
      siggy played guitar
    11. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Scientists now believe that advanced colonies of Sea Monkeys [sea-monkeys.com] once inhabited Mars.

      We should collect some and toss them in Eric Cartman's fishtank along with some semen.

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    12. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by torpor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, uh ... just a word on those critters and naming them ...

      Don't get too attached. In Triops world, if its organic you eat it. They are savage little fuckers.

      In my last batch from one of those kits, I got a -lot- of other shrimp (fairy, brine, etc.) going. Must've been the water, but it was a totally clear little swamp of crustacea for a while...

      Once those fuckers get big though, watch out. In the end, there will be only one living organism in that tank, and he will be fat.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    13. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      Colin Powell has pictures of what could ONLY be a mobile-brine laboratory. Cause enough for me....

    14. Re:Did someone say "brine?" by dchamp · · Score: 1

      ...which is a ripoff of Sandkings by George RR Martin. Also made into an Outer Limits episode.

  3. And where there's brine... by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...there's shrimp!

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    1. Re:And where there's brine... by TheLinuxSRC · · Score: 1

      Shrimp... Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.

    2. Re:And where there's brine... by Carthag · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyway, like I was sayin', shrimp is the fruit of the sea. You can barbecue it, boil it, broil it, bake it, saute it. Dey's uh, shrimp-kabobs, shrimp creole, shrimp gumbo. Pan fried, deep fried, stir-fried. There's pineapple shrimp, lemon shrimp, coconut shrimp, pepper shrimp, shrimp soup, shrimp stew, shrimp salad, shrimp and potatoes, shrimp burger, shrimp sandwich.

      That- that's about it.

    3. Re:And where there's brine... by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 1

      So it's like Spam, the meat product in a tin, not the unwanted email.

    4. Re:And where there's brine... by Gil2796 · · Score: 1

      ... there's tuna in brine! Mmmm...

      What? What do you mean there's no tuna on Mars? All these millions wasted and NOT A SINGLE TUNA TO SPEAK OF??

    5. Re:And where there's brine... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Sure there is. It just has to be grown first. Hope it's worth the wait. :)

    6. Re:And where there's brine... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      What? What do you mean there's no tuna on Mars? All these millions wasted and NOT A SINGLE TUNA TO SPEAK OF??

      Just watch out for the sand sharks. (It was a really old but very good episode of The Outer Limits.)

  4. Next thing... by TK2216UKG · · Score: 1, Funny

    Natural progression of this would tell me that there must be some tuna up there too.

    --

    - Jonathan :)

    No tuna is safe.

  5. I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by clifgriffin · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe this is obvious proof that Mars used to have oceans. Yes, oceans. And because they had oceans, they had life. And because they had life, they had Elephants. Only they weren't called Elephants. They were called Marlaphants.

    Yeah, Marlaphants.

    Anyone taking bets?

    1. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by TK2216UKG · · Score: 1

      I'm betting there aren't any Marlaphants on Mars. However, I do know a Marla and she is a bit uhm, 'portly'.

      --

      - Jonathan :)

      No tuna is safe.

    2. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by torpor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Marlaphants rock. I want some on my pyjama's!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by MyHair · · Score: 1

      Yes, but are there any Cave Marlaphants?

    4. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Bish.dk · · Score: 4, Funny

      Other people have made similar extrapolations.

      Burn, karma! burn!!

    5. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 5, Funny
      Frovingslosh was modded "+5 Funny" for his comment about water...and then it came true.

      The parent to this comment? Also "+5 Funny" (right now). How long before they discover the Marlaphants?

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    6. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by rynix · · Score: 1

      I googled for Marlaphants and I'm sorry to say the outlook isn't that good

      Your search - Marlaphants - did not match any documents.
      No pages were found containing "marlaphants".

      If its not on google it dosn't exist !

      --
      http://logd.programgeeks.net/referral.php?r=lordva der
    7. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you do if a Marlaphant comes in your window? Swim!

    8. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by gryphokk · · Score: 1

      Cartesian Logic in the 21 century:

      I google, therefore I am.

      Cartesian Search:

      I'm not on google, therefore I am not!

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
    9. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Unfortunatly, you only got modded +4 funny, so we can't trust a word you say.

    10. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Ateryx · · Score: 1

      Lucky enough to be getting moderator points, I'll soon be taking care of that.

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    11. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Ateryx · · Score: 1
      Lucky enough to be getting moderator points, I'll soon be taking care of that.

      nevermind...

      --
      "The truth suffers from too much analysis"
    12. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I modded you '+1 insightful' just to be safe...

      Have to post anonymously now though :-)

    13. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Why are they naked?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i once shot a marlaphant in my pajamas...

    15. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by ceejayoz · · Score: 1

      Ah, the predictive power of Slashdot.

    16. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Bish.dk · · Score: 1

      It's not part of that exact joke, it is the way that the comic is drawn in all strips. I find the comic to be very recommendable. Check out the rest of archive at http://www.wulffmorgenthaler.com/. The strips range from ok to hilarious.

    17. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the marlphant doing in your pyjamas?

    18. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      No... but I can just envision the rover digging itself a Very Deep Hole as part of its Very Clever Trap in order to catch a heffalump^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H marlaphant. :)

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    19. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by maduro55 · · Score: 1

      I believe all they've found evidence of is the Wooly Marlaphant and perhaps a large flying Marlaphant.

    20. Re:I'm going to go out on a limb here.... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      When asked to comment, Marla Gibbs said "Shut up, chile!"

  6. sigh by Tirel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Not this old argument again

    The permanent Martian ice caps are just that, water ice. They expand and shrink seasonally, with much of the winter increase being CO2 ("dry") ice. In the Martian summers the poles are too warm for CO2 ice, in the Martian winters, too cold for some of the atmospheric CO2 not to freeze out. (So yes, at any given time, one pole is mostly water ice, the other mostly (covered with) dry ice -- except in spring and fall when the CO2 is changing poles -- which is also when you tend to get planetary dust storms. Imagine that.)

    This has been more or less known since some astronomer first pointed a spectrometer at Mars, and largely confirmed by subsequent observation and exploration.

    The only real discussion is the percentages of same, and how much (if any) water or water ice is in the soil further from the poles.

    1. Re:sigh by Haeleth · · Score: 2, Informative
  7. Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd be interested to see what kind of hardware/bandwidth NASA have cos they serve up images and movies 24/7 and never seem to get slahdotted...

    1. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well access to every satellite probably helps (as long as they aren't using it for games - that lag is killer).

    2. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      what kind of hardware/bandwidth NASA have cos they serve up images and movies 24/7 and never seem to get slahdotted...

      While they handle the traffic well now, it definitely hasn't always been the case. I was working at Space Telescope Science Institute during the first servicing mission, and when they first put out the pictures from the repair, network access there slowed to a crawl. Of course, this was back in the infancy of the web (Dec. 93). The same thing happened when the comet crashed into Jupiter. And, of course, it wasn't truly "Slashdotted" since Slashdot wasn't around yet... just overwhelmed with traffic.

    3. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by Mr2cents · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      NASA doesn't host the sites themselves. They used to do that but because of the load peaks when something interesting happens, they now let a company (forgot the name) take care of it. They have multiple servers serving NASA pages.
      Another advantage is that scientists now still can log in when a probe lands or makes a discovery.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    4. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by digidave · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Interestingly, NASA uses Open Source Plone to run some of their sites, including the Mars rover site.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    5. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by McLoud · · Score: 1

      They use clusters, the hover included.

      --
      sign(c14n(envelop(this)), x509)
    6. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can't help you with hardware, but I can attempt to do a little karma whoring with nmap (for fun and profit!)

      Slightly edited (for brevity) transcript follows:
      <root@fennec> nmap -P0 -O marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov
      Starting nmap 3.48 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2004-02-20 14:34 EST
      Interesting ports on 198.5.148.7:
      (The 1640 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)
      PORT STATE SERVICE
      22/tcp open ssh
      80/tcp open http
      443/tcp open https
      Device type: general purpose
      Running: Linux 2.4.X|2.5.X
      OS details: Linux Kernel 2.4.0 - 2.5.20
      Uptime 307.509 days (since Sat Apr 19 03:21:22 2003)
      TCP Sequence Prediction: Class=random positive increments
      Difficulty=5171621 (Good luck!)
      TCP ISN Seq. Numbers: 3223BDE5 331C8EB8 32C3FA5D 32C9082B 3251ECD7 32DC6A8B
      IPID Sequence Generation: All zeros

      Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 11.963 seconds

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    7. Re:Has NASA ever been Slashdotted? by maduro55 · · Score: 1

      Clusters of hovering elephants.....

  8. Let's not forget by W32.Klez.A · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jokes, aside, let's not forget that this could house some microbial life, at the very least. Just look at our ocean's seabed around the vents.

    1. Re:Let's not forget by Cosmonut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's doubtful that there'd be microbes in existing near-surface brine simply because the surface has been extensively 'gardened', exposing underlying layers of soil to the unrestricted UV environment on the surface. On the other hand, I wouldn't rule it completely out either. If the duracrust is relatively firm 'gardening' might not have caused as much damage (and it's even possible that a lot of the landscape effects that are attributed to meteor impacts might actually be due to weather) so the potential for a near-surface biozone is certainly there. There's just no way to tell what's really going on up there without some hands-on work. The rovers are nice machines, but give me a guy with an education, a rock hammer and a microscope and I'll have Meridiani characterized in about a week.

    2. Re:Let's not forget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is KNOWN TROLL!

      MOD DOWN!

      Look at his posting history.

      MOD PARENT DOWN!

  9. Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hey George, Mars called, and they're running out of shrimp!

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Politburo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh yeah? Well the Jerk Store called.. They're running all out of YOU!

    2. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Well *you're* their best seller!

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    3. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I had sex with your wife!

    4. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, you run out of Jerk Store.

    5. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by SageMadHatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the difference? You are their all time best seller!

    6. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MCADAM: His wife is in a coma.

    7. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > In Soviet Russia, you run out of Jerk Store.

      And get shot for looking suspicious.

    8. Re:Obligatory Seinfeld Misquote by Bob+Vila's+Hammer · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Well I had sex with your wife!

      --


      --"The perfect example of the man of action is the suicide." - William Carlos Williams
  10. The first step to empire by SparafucileMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    And so begins the great Martian Salt Trade.

    1. Re:The first step to empire by glenrm · · Score: 2, Funny

      If only they had found Spice instead...

    2. Re:The first step to empire by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0

      He who controls the spice controls the universe!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:The first step to empire by damiena · · Score: 1

      The salt must flow!

    4. Re:The first step to empire by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      And so begins the great Martian Salt Trade.

      Actually brine is an important component in chemical manufacturing. Its discovery beneath Midland, Michigan led to the founding of the Dow Chemical Company. see
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dow_Chemical_Com pany

  11. If there is water on mars by Ubi_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..why did it not evaporate?

    The atmospheric pressure on mars is pretty low, which means that any liquid water (which this apparently is) will be vacuum dried to gas and move into outer space.

    --

    If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    1. Re:If there is water on mars by Tango42 · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's why they're not looking for water on the surface. Water mixed with rock, sand, or salt, or even just underground, would not evaporate.

    2. Re:If there is water on mars by kinnell · · Score: 5, Informative
      ..why did it not evaporate?

      The same reason they are speculating that it can exist in liquid form at such low temperatures: the phase diagram of a solution can be radically different from the pure substance. In hand-waving terms, the attracion between the salt molecules and the water molecules increases the energy required to evaporate the liquid. This is why they are theorising that it is highly concentrated brine - because if it were not highly concentrated, it could not exist under the temperatures and pressures on Mars. I'm probably not being unrealistic in suggesting that the scientists have thought this all through before publishing the press release.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    3. Re:If there is water on mars by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if the water DID evaporate, it would not, "move into outer space." There's this thing called gravity, which works on the molecules of gas-phase matter just as much as it works on liquids. The air doesn't "move into outer space," does it? The vapor would rise until it found equilibrium with other atmospheric gases. If there was a lot of water, you'd see it in the form of clouds.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    4. Re:If there is water on mars by noselasd · · Score: 1

      According to some articles I've read, there are many places on Mars where liquid water can exist between 0 and 8-10 degrees celcius.
      That window gets larger if the water is salty ofcourse.

    5. Re:If there is water on mars by Detritus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Gases do move into outer space. Gravity slows down the process, but it doesn't stop it. When you get to the outer atmosphere, the velocity of gas atoms and molecules follow a predictable statistical distribution, dependent on their atomic mass and average temperature. Many atoms and molecules will reach escape velocity, and diffuse away from the planet. What do you think happened to the atmospheric helium on Earth?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    6. Re:If there is water on mars by mikerich · · Score: 4, Informative
      ..why did it not evaporate?

      Most of it probably has. One process could be groundwater carrying dissolved mineral salts being drawn to the surface by capillary action. The water evaporates into the very low pressure Martian atmosphere, leaving the salt as a deposit.

      Similar processes take place on Earth where they deposit salt and iron oxides in deserts.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    7. Re:If there is water on mars by cball2k · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I thought the helium migrated to the vacume between Bush's ears...

      --
      karma, hah...
    8. Re:If there is water on mars by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "What do you think happened to the atmospheric helium on Earth?"

      It got into the lungs of a massive clown with a sqeaky voice I'd wager.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    9. Re:If there is water on mars by Psmylie · · Score: 1

      And that clown shall one day DESTROY THE UNIVERSE!

      (this is why i fear clowns...)

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    10. Re:If there is water on mars by painandgreed · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gases do move into outer space. Gravity slows down the process, but it doesn't stop it. When you get to the outer atmosphere, the velocity of gas atoms and molecules follow a predictable statistical distribution, dependent on their atomic mass and average temperature. Many atoms and molecules will reach escape velocity, and diffuse away from the planet. What do you think happened to the atmospheric helium on Earth?

      Yes, Mars most likely used to have a thicker atmosphere but has dwindled to a lack of volcanic activity, evaporation of water, and leeching of atmosphere off into space. The gravity of Mars is not great enough to hold an earlth like atmosphere. One astrophysisit friend of mine did the calculations once. If you gave Mars an earthlike atmosphere, say by dumping comets on to the surface, it would last for about 10,000 years before bleeding off into space. Not long at all in geological time, but good enough to figure it into terraforming studies.

      To take this one step further, things other than gases could also leave the atmostphere and enter space. Small spores enter the upper atmostphere and could be leaving the Earth's gravity. Some spores are highly durable and could survive in space indefinatly despite vacuum and radiation. Thus, we could have already colonated mars as spores leave our atmosphere, float across space, get caught by the other planet's gravity and fall to the surface. Or it could have happened the other way around and Mars populated the Earth with the first life. Similarly, one planet could be populating the region of space around them in such a way, so that life only needs to develop once on one world and could send out colonizing spores to bring life to suitable planets. At least, that was put forth in an article i read once. I keep meaning to do the calculations but never get around to it.

    11. Re:If there is water on mars by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      If gas molecules have enough energy so that their speed exceeds the escape velocity of a planet, they will leave the planet and will go into the outer space. There is an equilibrium of escape velocity of a specific planet vs kinetic energy of gas molecules, all molecules above certain energy level will escape the gravitational pull of a planet, that is why there is no free hydrogen or free helium in our atmosphere. Basically the 'lighter' the gas is, the more possibility of escape it has.

      BTW., I remember that if even some of the molecules of a specific gas escape a specific planet at any time, it means that all molecules of that gas will escape this planet eventually.

    12. Re:If there is water on mars by deglr6328 · · Score: 1

      Though, if this were true, all the groundwater should have all evaporated long long ago since there is no rain on Mars there is no way to replenish the water in the soil (except for the soil directly adjacent to the polar ice caps perhaps).

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    13. Re:If there is water on mars by HybridJeff · · Score: 1

      The clowns already came and left. [IMDB.com] They just killed a few people though, not the entire universe.

    14. Re:If there is water on mars by mikerich · · Score: 3, Informative
      Good point, but we simply have no idea if the process is continuous (in which case we have to come up with a damn good theory for replenishment), or if it is intermittant and relies on slight changes in temperature to release water from the permafrost.

      NASA already has some tangential evidence of permafrost on Mars, where it looks like molten rock has encountered subterranean ice and places where it looks like something is is seeping to the surface.

      NASA did choose these landing sites for evidence of water in the recent past, so perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised that something is going on.

      But I guess our best hope is to wait for Mars Express to point its instruments at the landing site. So fingers crossed until then!

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    15. Re:If there is water on mars by bluyonder · · Score: 1

      The median surface pressure on Mars is (coincidently or not) very close to the triple point of water. Which means that liquid water could exist on the surface for short periods. This also means that very small changes in temperature or pressure would cause very large differences in chemical dynamics.

  12. Brine predicted before by SpinyManiac · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a New Scientist article from January which argues for the presence of brine.

    --
    It's never too late to have a happy childhood.
    1. Re:Brine predicted before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about time they had a real scientist (David Chandler, UC Berkeley, Chemistry) comment, as opposed to the sensationalistic crap this magazine is known to publish.

  13. My god... it's full of hot-dogs! by Channard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Coming soon - Bonanza 2012, starring the head of Lorne Greene: Mars - the new frontier, thousands of fortune seekers stake their claim on the red planet, hoping to make their fortune panning for frankfurters.

    1. Re:My god... it's full of hot-dogs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Pickles.

    2. Re:My god... it's full of hot-dogs! by MR.Gates · · Score: 1

      Wrangling up some Bugalo I suppose

      --

      A few hours grace before the madness begins again.
  14. Great! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now there will be salt mines for the riff-raff when I take over Mars.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:Great! by johnmig · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Riff-Raff from Transexual not Mars?

    2. Re:Great! by twoslice · · Score: 1
      Now there will be salt mines for the riff-raff when I take over Mars.

      When did we stop trying for Earth Brain? (said in Pinky's voice)

      --

      From excellent karma to terible karma with a single +5 funny post...
  15. Salt? by Pirogoeth · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe it's leftover salt from Martian civilizations de-icing their driveways...

    --
    Happiness is like peeing yourself. Everybody can see it but only you can feel its warmth.
    1. Re:Salt? by Walterk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't be silly. Everybody knows Martians use hovering vehicles.

    2. Re:Salt? by thelasttemptation · · Score: 1

      but how can they hover on ice? Wouldn't the hover field slip? hrm? That's right, thought so!

    3. Re:Salt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe all the negative environmental effects from the salt is what killed the planet. That drove the evil creatures (picture animal from the muppets) deep underground.

  16. This just in by SparafucileMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rover is picking up hints of Martian Cities made entirely of Gold off in the distance. Spanish mercenaries, get ready!

    1. Re:This just in by bludstone · · Score: 1

      Better call Zia, Esteban and Tao.

      YAY for obscure references.

      http://www.whimsy.demon.co.uk/gold/

      --

      no .sig
    2. Re:This just in by rmezzari · · Score: 0

      Nobody expect the Spanish Mercenaries!

      --
      "Emancipate yourself from mental slavery, none but ourselves can free our minds !"
  17. What else would you get by evaporation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Great findings, but it seems somewhat obvious that there can't be clean fresh, salt-free water on mars if the hypthesis that most of it evaporated away is true.

    Else, all the rocks would only contain non water-soluble materials - hard to imagine.

    Speculation: The salt content of the water is probably be linked to the water content in atmosphere. The average evaporation rate for the brine into the atmosphere should match the rate of hygroscopic attraction of water from the atmosphere.

    1. Re:What else would you get by evaporation? by friendscallmelenny · · Score: 1

      Quote: "that there can't be clean fresh, salt-free water on mars if the hypthesis that most of it evaporated away is true." Unless of course it is in solid form. It will slowly sublimate but would remain for a long time. IF melted it would be as "clean and fresh" as when it froze.

  18. My theory... by dnaboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    My guess, one of these days one of the Mars rovers will stumble on upon Bikini Bottom, and be treated to the whimsical antics of SpongeBob, Patrick, Plankton, and Squidward. Come on, there's no space helmet wearing sassy squirrels like Sandy on earth. If there were, would I be sitting here typing?

    1. Re:My theory... by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      sounds like you have too much free times on your hand, too much free time...

  19. I see... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    Point is, first impressions may be incorrect and additional data and study leads to more accurate conclusions.

    So what you are predicting is Martian rats with salty urine. :-)

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  20. Don't they mean they found spice? by Cesaro · · Score: 5, Funny

    This would be much much more exciting if they found spice.

    Other rover was actually taken by a sand worm.

    In other news, new rovers will roll without rhythm. :)

    1. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by AndroidCat · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's really brine. The other rover was taken by a giant kosher dill pickle.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by BBPing · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news, new rovers will roll without rhythm.

      So they are sending Brittany Spears music with the new rovers?

    3. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Let's hope they don't find any peculiar rock formations.

    4. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 0

      This would be much much more exciting if they found spice. Other rover was actually taken by a sand worm. In other news, new rovers will roll without rhythm. :)

      Little do we know that these "rovers" are actually harvesters....

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    5. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Little do we know that these "rovers" are actually harvesters....

      So what are you saying, the spice must flow?

    6. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by Lane.exe · · Score: 1
      And in other news, pseudo-Muslim fanatic soldiers are seen attacking President Bush, yelling "Kill the Imperial scum!"

      Well, it's not that big of a stretch!

      --
      IAALS.
    7. Re:Don't they mean they found spice? by maduro55 · · Score: 1

      I can't wait until they find pepper to go with the salt. If they don't, I'm not going.

  21. MOD PARENT UP by wurp · · Score: 4, Informative

    The parent is right; the "+5 informative" grandparent is just wrong. We have known for some time that at least the north polar cap was composed mostly of water ice.

    References:
    http://www.nature.com/nsu/030210/030210-9.html
    http://www.space.com/missionlaunches/express_water _040123.html

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by CuriHP · · Score: 1

      Thanks for adding the references.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    2. Re:MOD PARENT UP by wurp · · Score: 1

      No problem. Wow, a tiny bit of knowledge (listed multiple times already in the comments) + 15 seconds of work with google = +5 informative.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bobby Martin
      Magicosm Development Team
      http://www.magicosm.net


      You don't trick us Bobby. You think dropping one 'a' from your last name would fool us? We earthlings are immune to your Martian mind bending, Bobby Martian.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT UP by wurp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Drat! I thought I was radiating a type 4 fermionic mental confusion field.

      You must be wearing your tin-foil hat ;-)

      BTW, DNS is down on magicosm.net right now. If you were thinking of checking it out, it should be back up in a couple of days. Blame Verizon :)

  22. Re:Too early to tell by torpor · · Score: 1

    so ... what ... you're telling me that these million dollar tinkertoys are really just up there sniffing rat piss?

    damnit. i want my money back! i already -know- enough about rat piss and i don't care if there's any on mars!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  23. Be careful by amightywind · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The Opportunity rover found hints of salty water in the trench that it dug, and scientists note that the Spirit rover is currently digging a trench of its own to investigate the soil that clings to its treads, suggesting the possibility of moisture.

    The very small particle size of Martian dust makes it likely that it sticks due to static charge. If the soil were moisture laden you would expect it to rapidly dry out and crust over (change appearance) on the wheels of the rover.

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Be careful by mbrod · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The very small particle size of Martian dust makes it likely that it sticks due to static charge. If the soil were moisture laden you would expect it to rapidly dry out and crust over (change appearance) on the wheels of the rover."

      No. The amount they are talking about causing this is much much smaller than the amount it would require to saturate it to the point of an observable change in appearance after exposure.

      It may even be the result of no water in it now but the result of residual salts left behind by existance of water at some point. Theoretically this could display these properties as well.

    2. Re:Be careful by amightywind · · Score: 2, Informative
      No. The amount they are talking about causing this is much much smaller than the amount it would require to saturate it to the point of an observable change in appearance after exposure.

      Then it is not likely to be enough moisture to bind the soil either. I still think it is lame speculation. You would think the thermal emission spectrometer could detect small amounts of water easily if it were there.

      It may even be the result of no water in it now but the result of residual salts left behind by existance of water at some point. Theoretically this could display these properties as well.

      Residual salts would be expected to bind the soil (duracrust), but not bind the soil to the rover wheels.

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    3. Re:Be careful by hcg50a · · Score: 4, Informative

      Right.

      The brine speculation is coming from people not involved on the project, which space.com is reporting uncritically. The news conference where the project scientists are presenting their information mention nothing about brine.

      See the entry for Thursday, February 19, 2004 at http://www.spaceflightnow.com/mars/mera/status.htm l.

      --
      HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
      11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
    4. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But one does wonder why the scientist use such colorful names to describe the locations. Sleepy Hollow, Laguna Hollow, El Captian, these are all names of beaches(or street names) near salt water beaches. Now if the scientist were to give them less colorful names like Death Valley, Yuma Valley, or Sahara Desert the press wouldn't be so enthralled with it all.

    5. Re:Be careful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops /s/"El Captian"/"El Capitan"

    6. Re:Be careful by mbrod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then it is not likely to be enough moisture to bind the soil either. I still think it is lame speculation. You would think the thermal emission spectrometer could detect small amounts of water easily if it were there.

      I agree with that, with the spectrometer's I thought they would be able to just scan and say exactly what the compositions are.

  24. Especially by maroberts · · Score: 1

    If you're playing against the LGM on their server!

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  25. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by jstave · · Score: 3, Informative

    why the heck havent they toddled over to the face? :( ...cause they've already determined that the face (ready for a shock?) isn't actually a face.

  26. Fe2O3 by martinX · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they rust-proofed the Rovers.

    --
    When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    1. Re:Fe2O3 by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 1

      Yes, they're both +5 rustproof blessed probes of exploration.

    2. Re:Fe2O3 by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 0

      I hope they rust-proofed the Rovers.

      No, but they paid extra at the dealership for the special undercoating.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    3. Re:Fe2O3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, there's not a lot of O2 around on Mars, so I bet they last a while longer than my Ford Fiesta.

    4. Re:Fe2O3 by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, there's not a lot of O2 around on Mars, so I bet they last a while longer than my Ford Fiesta.

      ANYTHING would last longer than a Ford. American cars are garbage.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  27. Not Morocco after all by KamuSan · · Score: 3, Funny

    So the Rovers are not in Morocco/Sahara after all...

  28. REPOST WHORE by teamhasnoi · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:REPOST WHORE by PhxBlue · · Score: 0

      Good call. Alas, if only Slashdot had a "-1, Plagiarism" moderation. . .

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  29. Re:Insensitive clod! by torpor · · Score: 1

    Get some Triops for that swank pad, you'll be so happy you upgraded!

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  30. Normally by maroberts · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you dig a trench in the sand and find salty water, you should start running because the tide is gonna come in any minute!

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Normally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could be going out.

  31. H2O IS ON TEH SPOKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stop the importation of Martian Dihydrogen Monoxide now! It's threatening the Earth's Dihydrogen Monoxide industry!

  32. Halophiles vs. Viking Landers by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This raises the possiblities of halophiles living on Mars. On Earth, halophiles can live in up to 35% salt solutions. Pure water would kill these creatures --causing them to aborb water until they burst.

    Its no wonder that Viking found no clear evidence of life on Mars, the low-salt water in Viking's nutirent broth probably killed any halophiles.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Halophiles vs. Viking Landers by ThisIsFred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I didn't know that the organisms necessarily had to be alive to show their presence.

      ??

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    2. Re:Halophiles vs. Viking Landers by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1
      I didn't know that the organisms necessarily had to be alive to show their presence.
      Well, duuuh! They have to wave at us!
      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  33. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by CuriHP · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why people get all worked up by a rock formation that looks like a face when viewed from the right angle. We have those here on Earth too. Anyone who has seen the "Old Man of the Mountain" in New Hampshire (before it collapsed anyway) can attest to this. It really looked like a face too. (Lincoln's face in my opinion.)

    --
    If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
  34. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by Dogers · · Score: 1

    pft, im with the conspiracy camp on that one ;)
    (simply for the idea!)

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  35. Tirel = Copy and paste troll. Congrats on +5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Where did you steal that text from? I'm guessing a google on some key sentence fragments will turn up something.

  36. Flamebait? by Anubis333 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Who would have ever thought, that one of mankind's thus far highest achievements would be building a robot to dig a trench somewhere far away, hoping to discover salt water.

    Maybe if it digs deep enough it'll find an aids vaccine.

    1. Re:Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually there are several HIV vaccines currently being tested. I'm a volunteer in a phase 1 study for one of them. (Before people ask, no I do not have HIV, this is designed to prevent me from ever getting it, hence, the vaccine terminology instead of the cure term.)

      Compared to discovering the cause and solution to diseases, sending a rover to mars isn't that complex. You can overbuild the rover to make sure it works, but if you overbuild a drug, it kills the recipient. And of course you can't point hubble at a virus and see how it works.

    2. Re:Flamebait? by Richy_T · · Score: 1
      Dude, go here, donate all your worldly goods and go live in a cave or shut the fuck up.

      Rich

    3. Re:Flamebait? by devilsadvoc8 · · Score: 0

      Why would it matter if you had AIDS or not?

      --
      B O R I N G
    4. Re:Flamebait? by Anubis333 · · Score: 1

      Wow, interesting how a comment can go from "+3, funny" to "-1, troll" in a matter of seconds. I was merely pointing out that there are a lot of issues here at home as well. Often people think there is nothing left to explore here. I love Nasa and am very into the rovers/Mars exploration. I just wish some science back here at home was as well funded or glamorous.

    5. Re:Flamebait? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because every time I mention the study to someone they assume I have HIV. It seems the usage of the term "vaccine" has been confused with "cure" or "treatment" in many people's minds.

    6. Re:Flamebait? by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      Wow, interesting how a comment can go from "+3, funny" to "-1, troll" in a matter of seconds.

      That's because slashdot doesn't have a "Kind of Funny, But Maybe You're Not Joking, In Which Case Your Post Sucks" moderation option.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  37. Re:Insensitive clod! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Cool. Thanks for the hint. Are they also common in eurpoe where I live?

  38. Gee... by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean there might actually be water on Mars, meaning that there's oxygen, that we could extract and breathe?

    If only someone had mentioned this possibility before.

    1. Re:Gee... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      there's also oxygen in CO2, which, as the main constituent of the Mars atmosphere, you dont have do dig out of the soil to get at.

      Water in the topsoil means you can bring a drill, a pump and a desalination device, and then you can drink it.

  39. Re:Too early to tell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what you're saying is... that we shouldn't just piss on Mars? ;)

  40. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by Dogers · · Score: 1

    just to really look like a wierdo, im replying to my own message :)

    I wonder if they thought about finding water, and getting stuck in it - is this why they sent TWO to be there at the same time? Can anyone make out a winch on the rovers??

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  41. Wait a minute.... by bob670 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Brine? Brine means pickles? Pickles means Mars was (or still is) inhabited by a highly evolved race of cucumbers? Earthlings eat huge quantities of pickles on burgers? Meaning McDonald's could be considered a weapon of mass destruction? So now Mars will declare war, great, this is just what the economy needs...

    1. Re:Wait a minute.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! Somebdy beat me to the pickles comment!

    2. Re:Wait a minute.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wouldn't mind figthing pickles, though.
      maybe they'll up the defence budget of
      McD then ...

    3. Re:Wait a minute.... by Anneb · · Score: 1

      Nah, it just means that the fourth planet is really a giant, pickled beet.

      --
      "Hey, Rocky! Watch me pull some intelligence out of the internet!" "Awwww, that trick never works!"
    4. Re:Wait a minute.... by Skatters · · Score: 0

      Mars can't declare war if Bush declares it first! Our space weapons will soon be operational! Darth Ronald beware!

  42. Re:Insensitive clod! by whovian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, I believe Europe does offer a wide selection of women from which to choose.

    --
    To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  43. Well, duh... by Channard · · Score: 1

    It's because on Earth, rocks are just rocks. Whereas on Mars, they're a sign of an ancient civilation who were peaceful, wise, who will one day return from the outer reaches of space to bring us the benefits of their great knowledge. And certainly not fry us with their flying saucers and death rays. Honest.

    Ultimately, it's for the same reason that any wisdom from the 'east' is automatically assumed to be of value, no matter how shoddy it may be. Rather like Lobsang Rama, whose philosophies were embraced but who turned out to be a plumber for Plympton.

  44. Mmmmm, pickels... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 4, Funny

    So now we know where all those pickled odities you find in redneck bars come from. I knew those things floating in brine must have come from another planet.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  45. Salt Water Disposal by stuffduff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When drilling for oil, there are often pockets of salt-water which need to be disposed of. This is done by drilling a new hole to another formation porus enough to accept the salt-water and pumping it down there. Wouldn't it be interesting if the rovers discover an old drill site and we find out (in Hoganesque fashion) that Mars really is the remains of a single catastrophic ecological disaster.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  46. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by Lispy · · Score: 1

    Hey if the martian face looks like a face then this piece of dirt does too. Wow! There MUST have been a civilisation...

  47. Dammit, Dammit, Dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The cost of Bush's Mars mission just went up 200%... to pay for a space hardened desalinization plant.

  48. Anybody else want to see a night time picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think they should take a picture at night so we can see what Mars' moons look like.

    1. Re:Anybody else want to see a night time picture? by Tsali · · Score: 2, Informative

      Someone here went over this already... the moons are so low and so small and orbit so quickly (and its so dark), that you probably wouldn't see them from the rover sites.

      I could be wrong, and I'm too lazy to look up the article.

      --
      This space for rent.
    2. Re:Anybody else want to see a night time picture? by mmcdouga · · Score: 1

      Pathfinder did it. Here's Phobos and Deimos.

    3. Re:Anybody else want to see a night time picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      They usually shut down the rovers at night because it's not generating electricity. They want to be on the safe side and have it wake up the next day.

    4. Re:Anybody else want to see a night time picture? by ravepunk · · Score: 1

      Strange how the martian moons are so pixellated.

  49. Better way to dig by dellis78741 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Rather than having the rovers scratch the surface or look at billion year old craters what they should do is send a large lump of heavy metal (say, 500 lbs) to Mars and, with it protected by a heat shield, slam it into the surface like an meteorite. Not having to account for parachute wind drift they could be pretty accurate with such a targeted blow and the result would be a small -fresh- crater. The crater could be observed by sensors in orbit and a rover landed in the vicinity shortly thereafter. Both the man-made meteorite and the rover could be sent together and initially orbited so as to allow time for a precise hit and accurate rover reentry.

    --
    ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
    1. Re:Better way to dig by vierja · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Keep in mind that making the rover land close to the meteorite's impact spot is extremely difficult. And given the low speed the rover moves at, I guess this wouldn't be feasible...

    2. Re:Better way to dig by first.last · · Score: 1, Funny

      Are you crazy? The Martians may consider it a pre-emptive strike and come fuck us the hell up.

      --
      Wishing I was a millionaire since 1969.
    3. Re:Better way to dig by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

      Interesting idea. Perhaps a better way than the experimental probes on the failed Mars Polar Lander mission. There where two probes designed to smash into the surface at high speed and take a sample a few meters down.

      Your idea would probably be easier :)

    4. Re:Better way to dig by forged · · Score: 4, Funny
      I think the words you're looking for are Beagle 2.

      We saw (or rather not) what happened when the lander crashed on Mars. Seriously, what did they expect ;)

    5. Re:Better way to dig by BlueEyes_Austin · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Deep Impact comet mission is quite similar to this notion.

    6. Re:Better way to dig by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      I thought the Brits already did this with a chunk of metal called Beagle?

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    7. Re:Better way to dig by dellis78741 · · Score: 1

      1) Putting the lander in orbit 1st allows us time to more precisely target a landing site. Fuel expended, yeah, but we do it with the orbiters there now. 2) I would expect the next round of rovers to be able to roam farter and faster. I think it will be feasible to put a rover down within a couple of miles of the earth-initiated crated and then drive to it. =====

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
    8. Re:Better way to dig by dellis78741 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, we've crashed a few things there but I seriously doubt any of them made much of an impact. Look at the scarring from Spirits' heat shield. Probably didn't penetrate even 1/2 a meter at best. Plus, crashed probes (ones that weren't intended to crash) scatter all sorts of elements on the spot and nearby, contaminating the site - the airbags from the current rovers are a good example. A pure heavy ore with perhaps a heat shield of something more resistant to friction would be easier to factor out of any site examinations.

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
    9. Re:Better way to dig by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Rather than having the rovers scratch the surface or look at billion year old craters what they should do is send a large lump of heavy metal (say, 500 lbs) to Mars and

      There are already relatively recent craters to study:
      http://www.martiansoil.com/archives/001276.php

    10. Re:Better way to dig by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "slam it into the surface like an meteorite."

      Bad BAD idea. If there were a hidden Martian civilisation, such an act really *would* mean war. ;)

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    11. Re:Better way to dig by ski2die · · Score: 0
      ...large lump of heavy metal

      You mean like Ozzy Osbourne?

    12. Re:Better way to dig by alfredw · · Score: 1

      ... or we could just drive the current rovers to where their backshells impacted. They're close by (440m for Opportunity) and have been imaged by Mars Global Surveyor. I also believe that Opportunity imaged some of its own jetissoned landing equipment as well.

      See MGS Images of Parachute and Backshell and Opportunity's image of its own parachutes and backshell.

      While this surely isn't a 500-pound high-speed impact, it certainly did kick up some dirt and has the HUGE advantage of already having been launched.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, sig types you!
    13. Re:Better way to dig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, in that case why not use a small nuclear weapon? What were the launch rockets originally designed to do? If you used a small tactical nuke that detached from the main telemetry orbitor/rover lander, would'nt that negate the problem of a small crater, and penetrate further. Sure, it'd probably dry stuff out, irradiate and life, and EMP anything going in with flash memory soon after, but it would look cool. (Yes, I do watch the videos of nuclear tests)

    14. Re:Better way to dig by dellis78741 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure examining heatshield or backshell impact sites will be much more useful that digging with the rovers. They didn't penetrate any bedrock and added a variety of foreign matter to the location (the backshell/parachute especially). What NASA needs is a crater the size of the one that Opportunity is now in, but freshly made so that the interior bedrock can be examined without trying to factor out what 1,000's or millions of years of UV exposure has done to it. RATing helps now but that is a poor 2nd to haing a fresh crater carved out.

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
  50. Re:Insensitive clod! by torpor · · Score: 1

    dunno ... i last had some when i lived in LA, but now i've moved to germany i have no clue where they are to be found, though i -think- i saw a triops kit in a toy store once, so i imagine they're available.

    it seems to me, if there is life to be found on mars, it'll be Triops-like in nature ... just a wild guess, you know, nothing educated about it at all. the fact that triops are so hardy and old and shit ...

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  51. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

    What about the pyramid then? Or are they afraid of disrupting the martian mind-control equipment inside it?

    *Ajusts tinfoil hat and looks about shiftily*

  52. Free Shrimp! w00t! by brainthought · · Score: 1

    So, does this mean, here in the US we all get free jumbo shrimp now? I mean, paragraph five specifically says, "ocean water", not an ocean.

  53. Ah, but... by abb3w · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Deimos and Phobos, while closer (23459 and 9378 km) to Mars than Luna is to Earth (about 384400 km), also have much smaller masses (1.8e15 and1.08e16 kg) than Luna (7.35e22 kg). [source]

    Tidal forces (being a function of gravitational differential) are an inverse-cube function on distance, and linear with mass, so that would be a tidal force about 1/99th that of which we're used to. (Disclaimer: I am not a Physicist, but I share a house with one.)

    While this is Mars, the concern isn't completely insane. If the rover's in position to get a 1% response from the Martian equivalent of the Bay of Fundy, we'll be needing yet another Mars probe, and someone at NASA should be needing a new job for putting it there.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
    1. Re:Ah, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we'll be needing yet another Mars probe, and someone at NASA should be needing a new job for putting it there

      Something more fitting for a nobel laureate you mean?

      Ok, I'm exaggerating. But the purpose of the mission if to find water. Having the rover being swept by the tide would be a spectacular success. Someone will get fired fo not noticing that lake from orbit, but the mars rover teams will be celebrating with champagne.

    2. Re:Ah, but... by jfdawes · · Score: 1

      I'm sure the rovers would be completely devastated by an onrushing deluge of a little under six inches of water.

      Oh, except it's not a wave ... it's a tide, so "an onrushing deluge" is pushing it a little, huh? Maybe "a piddly trickle". But then, we'd need to think about rewording the "completely devastated" bit.

      But you're right, if someone forgot the waterproofing, they need to be fired!

  54. Resolving Power? by mattr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I keep seeing references in the rover news about the microscopic imager, but is this really a microscope, or is it just magnifying as much as say a desktop macroscope for opaque objects (they let you see things around the size of a hair okay..? If there were things the size of microorganisms in the briny reaches, could we see them? It is impossible for the layman to look at the closeups we've been seeing and understand how big the field is.

    1. Re:Resolving Power? by zardor · · Score: 3, Informative

      The published images from the microscopic imager are about 3cm accross.
      (or about an inch and a quarter for the metrically challanged)

      --
      -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
    2. Re:Resolving Power? by mikerich · · Score: 4, Informative
      I keep seeing references in the rover news about the microscopic imager, but is this really a microscope, or is it just magnifying as much as say a desktop macroscope for opaque objects (they let you see things around the size of a hair okay..?

      It is definitely a microscope - going down to 30 microns per pixel. A hair is around about 100 microns in diameter.

      Sorry I don't have a precise magnification.

      If there were things the size of microorganisms in the briny reaches, could we see them?

      The objects seen in the ALH84001 meteorite were only between 20 and 100 nanometres (0.02 to 0.1 micrometres) and needed a scanning electron microscope to be seen. So MER can't hope to see them. Terrestrial bacteria are 2 to 10 microns (generally) in size - so the majority of them would also be invisible. There are some much larger bacteria; the largest known Epulopiscium fishelsoni is a whopping 250 microns in diameter.

      But it should be remembered that this is not a biological microscope - it was designed for petrological work which rarely requires such extreme magnification.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    3. Re:Resolving Power? by register_ax · · Score: 2, Informative
      http://astrogeology.usgs.gov/Projects/MER-AthenaMI /microscopic_imager.html

      There is also information about the rover, and science instruments on NASA's site, but these are extremely topical, but also good to look at first. So there you go.

  55. a more important existential question is by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    why is Slashdot never slashdotted? :rolls eyes:

    1. Re:a more important existential question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot has buckled under pressure tons of times. At least once a year it's offline for half a day or longer. Ofcourse, with mysql gradually evolving from a toy to a real database, this happens less and less. The extra hardware helps too, but slashdot was always db-limited.

  56. Oh no, not again! by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hasn't anyone else noticed this?

    The mars face has returned!

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Oh no, not again! by Halthar · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I just got off the phone with Richard C. Hoagland, and he said he was already investigating it.

      He started muttering something about 19.5 and then hung up on me.

    2. Re:Oh no, not again! by pankajsethi · · Score: 0

      Indeed my friend, Martian face has returned.

    3. Re:Oh no, not again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly the Inca have been too Mars!

    4. Re:Oh no, not again! by LuckyPhil · · Score: 1

      What ever happened to the 'face of mars'.

      Surely the latest images of mars have cleared up this conspiracy.

      Or is the face of mars still there, and NASA refuses to comment.

      Hang on, there's a knock on the door.......

  57. Venutian Beach Front Condos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe... just maybe, Mars was similar to Earth some-umpteen-billion years ago. And Earth will be like Mars in some-umpteen-billion years.

    I'm willing to take an entreprenurial risk and say we're overlooking the real moneymaker here... and that's Venus... once Earth moves out of this cushy orbit, Venus is going to move in. A couple billions years after that... Hot Venutian Chicks on my beaches.

    awwwYEAH.

  58. I'D MOD YOU UP by Progman3K · · Score: 1

    If I had points.

    That sounds like an interesting idea.

    Never even mind "how do we get the lump of material up there", aren't there meteorites or other space-junk that we could snag on the way?

    I suppose a solid block of metal has a better chance of reaching the surface, but since mars has a really tenous atmosphere, just how likely is a meteor to reach the surface, I wonder...

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  59. Fabric from another planet discovered on Mars! by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    (The other planet being Earth.) 'Torn fabric' puzzle on Mars

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  60. Partial pressure of salt solutions by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Informative
  61. bet ya! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i bet-ya, next their going to find
    insects on mars. it's prolly gona
    be some kindda scarbaeus thing.

    all very exciting. really to bad
    beagle didn't make it. it would have
    had a drill ...

  62. Re:This is great news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some moderators are clueless.

    The parent was marked redundant, when in fact it was second post (and was posted at the same time as the first post).

    Apparently the moderator saw the reponse to the first post which also mentioned sea-monkeys.

    But, if you look at the times of the postings, you will see that the response to the parent was actually about 20 minutes after the 2nd post.

    Please moderators... Use the redundant mod appropriately.

    (And, no. I'm not the poster of either comment.)

  63. Re: cratering Mars by dellis78741 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I suspect that snagging a suitable astroid and lugging it to Mars is much more complicated and expensive then sending something from here. The rovers themselves weigh over 400 lbs (on Earth) so sending a 500lb chunk of metal is no big deal. I'm sure some scientist could quickly calculate how big and what shape such a thing would need to be to maximize results in such an experiment.

    --
    ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
  64. Wrong Vehicle by aclaudet · · Score: 1


    Mud huh? Next time they'll have to send a Hummer instead of those wimpy electric vehicles.

  65. Gotta love science... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    You stick a couple of 100 million dollars worth of water detecting apparatus aboard a rover, and how do you eventually find the wet stuff? Right, it sticks to the tires...

    Doh!

  66. Based on Scientific Research by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1
    It will be 1 month and 8 days

    based upon the reference time periods in rational and unbiased, totally informed discussions found between HERE

    and HERE

  67. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by tuffy · · Score: 1
    What about the pyramid then? Or are they afraid of disrupting the martian mind-control equipment inside it?

    Nah. They just don't want to bother Sutekh.

    --

    Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  68. Dealerships... by grgyle · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone always warns you to always refuse the underbody-coating option, I'm sure NASA was trying to keep costs down when they went to the rover lot. Maybe those salesman really are correct after all...

    --
    ----- And all that the Lorax left here in this mess was a small pile of rocks, with one word...UNLESS.
  69. Since the scientists are looking for... by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    signs of life on Mars, and since it's likely that (being scientists) some of them are Monty Python fans, I humbly submit that the project should be called...

    "The Life of Brine".

    /ducks, runs away

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Since the scientists are looking for... by hwoolery · · Score: 2, Funny

      Animal rights activists outraged at the capture of brine microbacteria, demand that the NASA scientists "Weewease brine!"

  70. Re:hurrah, we found dirt! by mikerich · · Score: 1
    What about the pyramid then?

    No, no, no don't go to the Pyramids of Mars - otherwise you will disturb Sutekh - last of the Osirans!

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  71. Marlaphants found! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

    NASA scientists have just reported receiving a shocking image of a Marlaphant!

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    1. Re:Marlaphants found! by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Funny

      And this related species of Marlaphant. Clearly this species could not survive on Earth!

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  72. Re:Free Shrimp! w00t! - read the fine print by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For purposes of Long John Silver's offer, an ocean is defined as a single body of water, the surface area of which equals or exceeds five million square kilometers."

    No free shrimp yet...

  73. Sprit has dug a trench,,, by zardor · · Score: 1

    The sprit rover has now also dug a trench in "Laguna Hollow"

    --
    -- We don't understand software, and sometimes we don't understand hardware, but we can *see* the blinking lights
  74. Apologies to Top Secret by Matey-O · · Score: 1

    This means our astronauts will have an unlimited supply of table salt!

    Apologies to Most Extreme Elimination Challenge:
    AAAAAAAsssstronaut!

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
  75. Re:Is this a bizarro universe? by SmackCrackandPot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because if they were sent to the polar ice caps, they'd probably get stuck in an ice-crevice or snowdrift upon landing. And you don't want to land on mountains or rough terrain either.

    Even if there were lakes or oceans on Mars, you wouldn't want to land on them because the probe would be constantly bobbing about, making satellite communications extremely difficult.

    So that leaves flat, soft sandy deserts as your only choice.

  76. With apologies to Nickelodeon.... by General_Corto · · Score: 3, Funny

    Administrator O'Neill: Are ya ready engineers?

    Engineers: Aye Aye, Administrator!

    AON: I can't hear you!

    ENG: AYE AYE, ADMINISTRATOR!

    AON: Ohhhh.... who's driving around on a planet briney?

    ENG: Spirit Squarepants!

    AON: Along with his good friend Opportunity!

    ENG: Spirit Squarepants!

    AON: He's grinding at rocks with his robotic arm...

    ENG: Spirit Squarepants!

    AON: Hoping his file system does him no harm!

    ENG: Spirit Squarepants!

    All Together: SPIRIT SQUAREPANTS, SPIRIT SQUAREPANTS, SPIRIT SQUAREPANTS

    AON: Spirit.... Squarepants!

  77. May have? May have?!?! by fleener · · Score: 1
    'may have struck water'

    Is this what passes for NASA news now? Everything is "may have," or "could be," or "might be." Will we get follow-up reports when they do the testing to confirm the news is, "is not," "could not," and "no bloody chance?"

    1. Re:May have? May have?!?! by TwistedGreen · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It's called science. I suggest you familiarize yourself with how it works.

    2. Re:May have? May have?!?! by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... Everything is "may have," or "could be," or "might be."

      Well, if you'd like to walk over and verify it personally, be my guest.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    3. Re:May have? May have?!?! by eggstasy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Look, it's just the way science works. People form a hypothesis, do a lot of testing to confirm it, submit it to peer-reviewed journals where other scientists attempt to reproduce their results.
      It takes more than a 5-minute experiment to get any degree of certainty in science.
      Would you rather that they announced fantastically overhyped results before doing any testing?
      Frankly I don't know what the big deal is about liquid water and mars. We know that there's plenty of frozen water, and also that the martian atmosphere contains trace amounts of moisture. Is it 0.3% or 0.03%? It's been a while.
      If we know that there's solid and gaseous water, liquid water just seems like something obvious and not a major discovery.
      The really big deal would be quantifying that liquid water, which is almost impossible. We have no idea if there are gigantic oceans hidden underground, or even a few smaller pools, or anything at all.
      Inside our planet there are literally tons of water, and in many cities that's what you drink, purified underground water.
      I'm not an expert, but why aren't they doing more seismographic tests, or even looking at sending a ground penetrating radar to mars?
      I dont know about the radar but seismographs are small and cheap...

    4. Re:May have? May have?!?! by abradsn · · Score: 1

      Maybe next time. It seems that we are just snooping around on the surface for now.

    5. Re:May have? May have?!?! by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > why aren't they doing more seismographic tests, or even looking at sending a ground penetrating radar to mars

      I thought that the orbiter was doing those kinds of tests? I can't find any links quickly, but somewhere I read or heard that after the orbiter was "finished" with its seismographic scans, we would have a better internal picture of Mars than of Earth. Or did I dream that...?

    6. Re:May have? May have?!?! by fleener · · Score: 1

      Science is not about announcing suspicions and hopes. Science is not public relations. You're trumpeting a bastardization of science.

    7. Re:May have? May have?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm, no. That's not how science works. This is public relations working. Scientists don't look at photos and announce "maybe" discoveries. They wait and do their analysis of the data (you know, using all those instruments they put on the rover) before saying anything. Oooh, "discoveries" based on digital photos. Yeah, umm, I'll wait until they have collected more data besides the photos. The photos are only a first step. This is PR because you won't see front page stories when their "discoveries" turn out to be wrong. They're spending too much time justifying their budget and not enough time on hard science.

    8. Re:May have? May have?!?! by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware that I was 'trumpeting' anything.

      *sigh*
      The things Slashdot can do to a person... terrible.

  78. brine!? by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

    Not only did the rover find a liquid brine on Mars, but evidence of fossilized "pickled egg" like objects and old discarded kegger cups were found.

    --

    "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
  79. If there is salt water... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does that mean there are electric eels and Kraken too?

  80. With apologies to Sean O'Keefe by General_Corto · · Score: 1

    Who I seemed to think was Sean O'Neill.
    Where the hell did I get that from?

  81. Why is it taking them so long? by netglen · · Score: 1

    So why is it taking them so long to determine if the sticky ground is briny? The same goes for those strange round pebbles that they found. Have they even begun to drill/scoop samples for testing? What's with the delay?

  82. Cool! Mud... by praedor · · Score: 4, Funny

    That means that NASA can start putting cool mudflaps on future rovers. You know, those flaps with the naked ladies on 'em? R-r-r-r-r baby!

    --
    In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  83. No Life On Mars by PrintError · · Score: 3, Funny

    There can't possibly be any life on mars.

    The club scene is a barren landscape, and the whole place is just one big red light district.

    1. Re:No Life On Mars by Tripster · · Score: 1

      Why not?

      We have many examples of life on Earth existing in extreme locations we never thought life could survive.

      If life in the universe is the norm rather than the exception then I'd fully expect to see at the very least signs of microbial life on Mars, keep in mind that there are daytime surface temps of 15c on Mars which is quite cozy considering.

      Now, whether life exists on Mars today is unknown right now, but I really do feel the chances are quite high just judging by the sheer pervasive nature and diversity of life on Earth, I get a feeling life is the norm in the universe myself.

      No we aren't going to find complex life beyond fungus, basteria and microbes I think, but that is still life and it would mean we are likely not alone in the universe after all.

  84. what about Brine Shrimp ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://sea-monkeys.com/

  85. Opportunity costs too high by Jerf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The opportunity costs are too high for this to be feasible. If we're throwing 500 pounds of anything at Mars, it's going to be a little more sophisticated then a hunk of inert metal.

    This would be a feasible experiment if slinging 500 pounds of material around the Solar System were something we could do causually, so it's not like it's a bad idea, but at our present stage of development, we'd want that 500 pounds to be probes and satellites and sensors and such that are more useful for making things other then holes.

    1. Re:Opportunity costs too high by barzok · · Score: 1

      What if we sent an orbiter, it did its job, and its last task was to drop itself onto Mars? Then a second orbiter or rover could come along and check it out.

    2. Re:Opportunity costs too high by dellis78741 · · Score: 1

      Whether we throw 500 lbs of lead or electronics at Mars is irrelevant. The object is scientific discovery and if thumping Mars with a 500 lb steel rock creates a greater opportunity for scientific research and discovery then sending a rover to scratch on the surface then that's what we should do.

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
    3. Re:Opportunity costs too high by samcentral2000 · · Score: 1

      But couldn't we just use something that's already up there? I mean, there's gotta be lots of crap floating around in orbit around mars, so why not equip a small lightweight probe-thingy with some sort of "push"-device. That way, we wouldn't have to drag the 500 pound would-be meteorite all the way from home.

    4. Re:Opportunity costs too high by watzinaneihm · · Score: 1

      What the original poster said is partially correct. To dig a hole the easiest way is to get Mars gravity to do it for you. But you don't need to lug a 500lb mass from earth for that. What you probably need is a half pound missile and a robot which can attach it to a small meteorite you find in general space. Then use the small missile to move it into an impact path with mars (and aim it) and you should be clear. Moving a 500 lb mass in space should cost almost no energy at all. On the other hand digging a hole in the mud probably is very energy intensive (they use solar panels so irrelevant) and requires a robot capable of digging. I think the missile would be simpler.

      But then the point is that when the probe left earth we probably dint know if we needed to dig or crawl or whatever. In this case a general pusrpose robot is better

      --
      .ACMD setaloiv siht gnidaeR
    5. Re:Opportunity costs too high by retinaburn · · Score: 1

      What if it could send email too ?

    6. Re:Opportunity costs too high by jfdawes · · Score: 1

      A couple of problems:

      You may not be able to tell which is Mars and which is meteor after it hits.

      Meteors have a tendency to break up/burn up in the atmosphere. (Yeah, Mars doesn't have much of that, but it's still there)

    7. Re:Opportunity costs too high by dellis78741 · · Score: 1

      "You may not be able to tell which is Mars and which is meteor after it hits." Especially if it is an 'Armageddon' size rock...heh Seriously, though, I suspect that the cost of sending a 'tug' to the asteroid belt and retrieving an asteroid and putting it on a collision course with Mars would be both more expensive and more difficult than launching a heavy load from earth.

      --
      ======= ~\_/~\_O Burmese
  86. water? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Funny

    What happens if the rover DOES find water? Would it sink or would it float? Logic dictates that if it floats, it is therfore a witch and must be burned.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  87. Ok,it's not a game anymore... by thrill12 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want whoever had hidden my shiny roundmarbles on Mars to come and tell me the truth.
    I lost these things since the first grade, sniff, how am I supposed to get them back from there?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
  88. The truth of Mars Life by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    Brine on Mars?

    Of course! And you can find Martian Life here.

  89. Webcam by Frans+Faase · · Score: 1

    I get the impression it is about the same you can do with a cheap webcam at the same focus distance. I took some interesting pictures of bugs with a Philips webcam that can focus at about an inch.

  90. Why do we hurt the ones we love? by JasonUCF · · Score: 1

    Banjo?? Banjo!?!? BAAAANNNNNNJJJOOOOOO!!!!

    One sea monkey... one super (hero) vitamin....

  91. Beer & Brine by SirTreveyan · · Score: 1

    Beer has been proven conclusively to be a brine pre-cursor.

    --

    SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0

    0 rows returned

  92. Will the earth viruses/bacteria survive? by PaneerParantha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Question: If you take viruses or bacteria from Earth's extreme regions and leave them on Mars, will they survive?

  93. Leaky rovers by hazem · · Score: 4, Funny

    They BOTH found it? Maybe the rovers are just leaking some of their antifreeze?

  94. Space Elevator already! Forget this stuff.... by blankoboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really wish that the majority of global space efforts would go towards designing and constructing a space elevator already. This is really what they need in order to get things rolling in outer space. The major hurdle is getting anything we construct here on earth off the surface, past the atmosphere and out past orbit....If a successful implementation of space elevator were to exist we could simply raise our payloads out past the atmoshere and snap together prebuilt space cruisers in space. Then we could really have some serious space travelling. Unt il then we will just piddle around with the Xprize and trying to get chunks of metal off the earth's surface....we're still stuck in our sandbox with our pale and shovel...how depressing. If only more effort and funing were to go toward space instead of missiles and chem weapons, etc...sigh.

  95. Static? by carldot67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Dry stuff. Wiggle. Rub. Static. Clumping?
    Also, someone asked "if you took an earth extremeophile and plonked it mars, what would happen".
    It might burst and die. It might dry out and die. It might use its energy reserve and die. Its innards might freeze and die. Its DNA and proteins might get fried by the radiation and die. (Notice how many of these involve the word "die"?).
    There are one or two genera that might just have time to kick their sporolation apparatus into action and retreat their important bits (mostly tightly packed DNA) into a dry, tough husk. But thats as good as its going to get I would think.

    --
    I wish at was Friday, but I dont want to wish my life away. So I wish it was last Friday.
  96. Re:Cool! Mud... by jsahol · · Score: 1

    No mudflaps, but I want to be the 1st to go 4-wheeling on Mars...tho I think the moon would be better for rock crawling...lower gravity, more interesting rock formations (at least so far as I've seen).

  97. I'm Still Doubtful About Life On Mars by EXTomar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why am I doubtful that life is there now? Because life is agressively pervasive. Once a life form can eek out a foothold in an environment it will exploit it to the maximum effect. The only example we have so far is our planet but the effect of life on Earth profound and blantanly obvious! There is hardly a spot any place where some life form of one type or another has exploited the environment around it and thrived leaving evidence something was once living there. Life doesn't hide. It spread like wildfire.

    So if life on Mars exists now it should be easy to find. So if there is brine type life on Mars it should be easy to find because natural selection would kick in leaving the heartiest lifeforms left to spread as far and as wide as possible. You should be able to find large clusters of the stuff all over. So why haven't we yet? Maybe we aren't looking in the right spots. Maybe we don't have the right scientific tools out there yet. The point is that if life has a foothold anywhere on Mars is should be obvious when we stumble across it.

    1. Re:I'm Still Doubtful About Life On Mars by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1

      It would be difficult for anything to survive of the *surface* of Mars because of solar radiation.

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:I'm Still Doubtful About Life On Mars by nicophonica · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Why am I doubtful that life is there now? Because life is agressively pervasive.

      There are a couple faults in your analysis about the possibility of life on Mars.

      The first is your statement about life being aggressively pervasive. This is only true in one sample that that we know about, Earth. We have no idea whether there are other types of life that are either not aggressively pervasive or pervasive but not not easily detected.

      Second, there are areas, even on Earth, where life is existent but not aggressively pervasive. Ocean floor thermal ducts and the interior of Antarctica being notable examples. So, from even our limited sample, one could draw the conclusion that the aggressiveness and pervasiveness of life is proportional to the hospitableness of the environment. From that one would expect any life that exists on Mars to be very difficult to find.

    3. Re:I'm Still Doubtful About Life On Mars by bluyonder · · Score: 1

      Unless it can only survive underground. Another reason to dig more holes.

  98. We make craters on Mars all the time! by koa · · Score: 1

    Actually, its too bad the rovers have a limited range.. and too bad we dont know where Beagle 2 crashed. If Beagle 2 crashed anywhere near Opportunity we would probably see the man-made crater that was mentioned in the parent post.

    --
    ....move along....nothing to see here....
  99. how did the water get there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    makes you wonder how the water got there
    in the first place and mean if it's prone
    to "evaporate" ...

    considering the formation of a planet being
    quit a "hot" excercise ...

  100. Re:Free Shrimp! w00t! - read the fine print by nucal · · Score: 1
    Fine print - you aren't kidding:

    Long John Silver's has purchased an insurance policy to cover the anticipated cost of the free Giant Shrimp redemption, should NASA announce the discovery of conclusive evidence of an ocean on Mars between now and February 29, 2004. In the event NASA makes an official announcement that conclusive evidence of an ocean has been discovered on Mars prior to that date, every person in the U.S. will have an opportunity to obtain one free Giant Shrimp at participating Long John Silver's restaurants in the United States. Redemption will take place on Monday, March 15, 2004, from 2 p.m. until 5 p.m. Additional information and offer details will be made available to consumers on the Long John Silver's web site and in press materials, should this event occur.

  101. Motive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who else thinks frovingslosh has some deeply incriminating pictures of Michael?

  102. Water staying in atmospheres. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Gases do move into outer space. Gravity slows down the process, but it doesn't stop it. When you get to the outer atmosphere, the velocity of gas atoms and molecules follow a predictable statistical distribution, dependent on their atomic mass and average temperature. Many atoms and molecules will reach escape velocity, and diffuse away from the planet. What do you think happened to the atmospheric helium on Earth?

    Molecular weight of helium: 4
    Molecular weight of water: 18

    Gases escape over geologic time if the mean particle velocity is more than about a tenth escape velocity (if I recall correctly). Light particles at a given temperature (defined by average particle kinetic energy) move faster and so are lost more readily. Heavier particles are moving more slowly, and so are lost at a _much_ slower rate (the tail of the Boltzman distribution is exponential).

    The real reason Mars has relatively little water is that water is broken up in the upper atmosphere by interaction with solar UV. While water may not be light enough to escape, hydrogen definitely is (molecular weight 2, and weight of an atomic hydrogen radical formed by a UV event is 1). This mechanism works on all of the planets (especially the inner ones) to strip their atmospheres of hydrogen.

    Mars has a less active geology than Earth. We get hydrogen compounds (including water) replenished from volcanic sources. Earth also has a much higher escape velocity, which means that hydrogen is lost less quickly when formed (and has longer to recombine to form chemicals with higher molecular weight).

    Both of these help explain why Earth is wet and Mars isn't. On the short term, however, water stays bound in Mars's atmosphere just fine. Those ice caps that migrate seasonally via atmospheric gas transport aren't all CO2, you know.

    You can find a number of documents online discussing why Venus did get stripped of most of its water, despite being heavy and having a fairly active geology.

    1. Re:Water staying in atmospheres. by The12thRonin · · Score: 3, Funny
      You can find a number of documents online discussing why Venus did get stripped of most of its water, despite being heavy and having a fairly active geology.
      Would that have to do with all the women's spas on Venus? John Grey world seem too agree with me on that one.
    2. Re:Water staying in atmospheres. by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      "The real reason Mars has relatively little water is that water is broken up in the upper atmosphere by interaction with solar UV."

      No.

      The *real* reason is that sandtrout are locking the water up in underground cysts. *Sigh* havn't you read Dune?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    3. Re:Water staying in atmospheres. by bwcbwc · · Score: 1

      The molecular weight factor goes beyond H2 and H2O. Consider:
      MW Oxygen=32
      MW Carbon Dioxide=44

      Mars atmosphere is heavy on the CO2 for a reason: it's gravity is weak enough to allow anything lighter (except maybe oxygen) to escape, given the right collisions in the upper atmosphere. If a CO2 molecule whacks a water molecule from behind, it could go into orbit.

      The water in the soil also makes sense from my freshman chemistry. Solutions of water with soluble solids undergo "freezing point depression" and "boiling point elevation". I'm not sure what the underlying cause of these effects is, it seems to result in brine reaching a concentration in the soil where it is too old to rock'n'roll (boil/evaporate) and too young to die (freeze).

      --
      We are the 198 proof..
  103. Great...now all we need are... by Frennzy · · Score: 1

    ...some shot glasses, limes, and Tequila!

    If true, I can guarantee that Fraternities the world over would spend every nickel they have in order to host the first ever "Mars Shooter Bash!"

  104. Re:Cool! Mud... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    No mudflaps, but I want to be the 1st to go 4-wheeling on Mars...tho I think the moon would be better for rock crawling...lower gravity, more interesting rock formations (at least so far as I've seen).

    Most of the places where probes and landers land are flat to reduce the risk of landing problems. I am sure there are some pretty interesting features on Mars. Orbiter photos even suggest some spikey Arizona-like rock formations. Of course all the hyper vacationers will probably ruin them all one of these days.

  105. 500 Pounds?..No Prob!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just have the U.K. send another Beagle, and wait for the crater! :-D..sorry, couldn't resist.

  106. Even this is a repost by rueba · · Score: 1
    original

    It seems that this is an increasingly popular form of karma-whoring.

    Perhaps an entry should be added here: slashdot culture

    --
    The only reason all cover-ups appear to fail is that you never hear about the ones that succeed.
  107. OT (sig comment) by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
    For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/rand (may need to try more than once)

    No. You don't need to do it more than once, but you may need to wait a while.

    Once, after 8 months of constant generation, I got almost the entire 3rd act of Hamlet, but it was missing a scene, so I had to throw it out.
    I used the pattern of incomming spam to a friend's mail server to seed the random number generator. Now that spammers are using random words as filter fowls, I can even use the spams themselves.

    If you want to help the project, send all of your spam to input@shapespearegenerator.com

    --
    Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
  108. Mars Worms? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I have read that some soil photos showed worm-like "threads" that some speculated came off from the airbags. I know that some say there are tube-like hollow areas in the soil, but this was actual threads, not holes, they were talking about. Does anybody have a photo link? Or, is it just a rumor?

    1. Re:Mars Worms? by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 3, Informative

      The threads info and photo can be found here.

      Could these be the worm tubes you are refering to? More on them here and here. The worm tubes are a heck of a lot larger than the microscopic images from the rovers. As mentioned in the linked articles, Arthur C. Clark, proposed the glass worm tubes idea.

  109. Pirates by Plumpkin · · Score: 1

    I'll bet the brine contains whole fleets of tiny pirate ships, full of little microbial pirates with the power to grow upwards of ten feet tall at will. Make your amends with god. Say your final goodbyes. We are all doomed when the giant martian pirates find out we've been sending robots after them. "INUKTCHUK!"

    1. Re:Pirates by MacDaffy · · Score: 1

      Cartman already discovered the Sea People! Too late!

  110. FREE SHRIMP!!!! by ndogg · · Score: 1
    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
  111. Solar Wind by Detritus · · Score: 1

    My Astronomy professor also mentioned the solar wind as a contributing factor. Mars is geologically dead, so there is no significant magnetic field to shield the planet from the solar wind. This has accelerated the loss of the Martian atmosphere.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  112. Brine? Salt? Water? Send monkeys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It seems pretty clear to me we need to send some monkeys up there. Then we wait about 1 million years for them to evolve into an intelligent species so we can send astronauts to visit and do yet another painful "Planet of the Apes" movies.

  113. New job by abb3w · · Score: 1


    True: exactly what the new job will be will depend to a great extent on how convincing the person is when they say "I meant to do that!" when their boss's boss comes round to ask about it.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  114. In other news by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

    Food Geek Alton Brown has done a show on space based cooking. He's planning on somehow working on shooting poultry faster than light at Mars, so that it technically brines on the planet's surface BEFORE cooking by burning up on hitting the atmosphere.

    --

    --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  115. Hrm. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

    You are required to maneouver straight down this trench....

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  116. Frovingslosh? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    as in Free Roving Slosh?

    Not only did he make this precipitous prediction, but it seems his nickname has meaning attached to his prediction?

    adjust YOUR tin foil hat accordingly!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  117. More evidence of Life on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice the face in this picture?? Bears a strong resmblance to the original 'face on mars'

    Coincidence? I think not.

  118. Google on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, it's "brine," not "brin."

  119. With apologies to Tetsche... by Hanno · · Score: 1

    "Sag ich doch, es gibt Lehm auf'm Mars!"

    (Tetsche is a German cartoonist. I always liked that joke, but I cannot find the old cartoon online now...)

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
  120. Brine== water, probability of life approaches 1 by waferhead · · Score: 1

    Considering things live in the highly concentrated brines here on earth and nearly boiling temps, not to mention antartica and the seabed trenches in volcanic ducts it's jut a matter of time.

    To my untrained eye, any prescence of liquid water (damp dirt counts) means we will very likely eventually turn up some form of life on mars, alive, not as a fossil.

  121. OB Goats link... by Cyno01 · · Score: 1
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  122. Thank you. by Kris_J · · Score: 1

    Somwhere else this was described as "liquid salt water brine". It's nice to see people at /. actually know what these words mean.

  123. brine seems implausible by grikdog · · Score: 1

    The predominant fluid on Mars today is the thin electrodynamic particle storm that kicks up and covers the planet from pole to pole at intervals, not water. With the kind of electrical hoohah you'd get in those storms, you'd expect to melt sand in midair and precipate silicate sleet as ... mysterious spherules. Martian dust in suspension probably behaves more like a plasma, in other words a "fourth state of matter."

    --
    ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  124. Damaged wheel? by oldbeamer · · Score: 1

    At the NASA rover site you can see the trench and both the front wheels.

    Does the left front wheel look like it has been damaged?

  125. Martian hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    space.com just mention that Nasa found "thread" like on Mars. Could it be from Martians?

  126. Examples on Earth - Brine Shrimp & Soil Crust by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 1
    Sphere Analogs On Earth???
    Might the subsurface "sparkling" spheres be a form of Martian brine shrimp eggs
    ... These eggs are remarkably resistant to adverse environmental conditions...

    similar to the Great Salt Lake brine shrimp eggs???

    photo 1

    photo 2

    More on the Great Salt Lake Brine Shrimp ecology can be found here:

    Link 1

    Link 2

    Soil Crust Analogs on Earth???
    Likewise a USA Today article Imprint shows Mars craft landed in 'weird stuff' describes "The soil was stripped up and folded in an interesting way," said Jim Bell, who designed the panoramic camera that Spirit used to photograph the "mud-like" patch. "It has quite alien textures."

    Might this soil crust on Mars be same/similar to the biological soil crust found at Arches National Park (Moab, Utah)?

    Additional details regarding biological soil crusts maybe are to found here:

    intermediate details

    advanced details

    --

    I believe Juanita

  127. Re:Examples on Earth - Brine Shrimp & Soil Cru by rm3friskerFTN · · Score: 1
    An earlier Slashdot post pointed me to a New Scientist article

    It shows mostly sand-sized particles, but with a large number of apparently hollow spheres or tubes. The image resolution is about 30 microns per pixel - about the width of a human hair.

    Such grains were completely unexpected. But John Grotzinger, a geologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says they closely resemble formations he has seen in soils in the southwestern deserts of the US [rm3friskerFTN - perhaps lending some weight to my earlier analogy to Arches National Park @ Moab, Utah, USA]. "There are little tubes that build up by capillary action," he told New Scientist, as salty water evaporates from the nearly-dry soil.

    --

    I believe Juanita

  128. Re:Better way to dig -- Dyn-o-mite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Equip the rover with a gun that can shoot an explosive projectile into the ground.

  129. Apple surely have this one sewn up by MooKore+2004 · · Score: 1
    • They're running at a low cost (at least in their terms :-)
    • they've got a reputation for 'cool' design
    • It's easy for them to match the h/w and s/w
    • They were there first, at least with a viable legal business model
    Everyone else is an also-ran for the forseeable future, IMHO. It'd take a pretty big hitter (and Napster aren't big enough) to break it, with a significant investment. Frankly Apple are doing what the RIAA etc. should have paid someone to do a long time ago...