Slashdot Mirror


Satellite Celebrates 20 Years Working in Orbit

lloydwood writes "The UoSAT-2/UO-11 small satellite was launched into low Earth orbit on 1 March 1984 from Vandenberg Air Force Base. Twenty years later, it's still in orbit and operational -- and we recently found launch footage. To celebrate the twentieth anniversary of starting in orbit, the original video celebrating the UoSAT-2 launch is available (in windows media and mpeg). Thrill to the computers, the clothes, and the haircuts of 1984. SSTL has launched more than twenty satellites since."

199 comments

  1. Not for a few more minutes... by suso · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait, I'm calibrating the targeting device on my low orbit space modulator.

    Hold it... Hold it........ Fire!

    1. Re:Not for a few more minutes... by herrvinny · · Score: 4, Funny
    2. Re:Not for a few more minutes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BarbNeal? Is she the Cowboy's wife?

    3. Re:Not for a few more minutes... by MrTangent · · Score: 1
      Thrill to the computers, the clothes, and the haircuts of 1984.
      Thrill to the servers melting under the weight of /.'s hoards of virginal geeks.
  2. I bet... by Cytlid · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it runs Unix.

    --
    FLR
    1. Re:I bet... by loserbert · · Score: 3, Funny

      But have they paid for their license?

    2. Re:I bet... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You bet it runs Unix?

      BRILLIANT!!!

      Please help me

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    3. Re:I bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, NASA had it's own operating system called PLEK-SLC for satelites back then.

  3. Umm... by leifm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since when do we celebrate various equipment still working? Guess I better ready for my PS2's upcoming 2 year still working anniversary!

    --

    "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
    1. Re:Umm... by bob+dobalina · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Since we only ever talk about satellites when they break, it seems only fair.

      --

      B

      "I'm payin' taxes, but what am I buyin'?" -- James Brown

    2. Re:Umm... by pcraven · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, I'm so old every time I hear PS2 I still think of IBM's old PS/2. Anyone else remember those?

    3. Re:Umm... by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny

      Since when do we celebrate various equipment still working?

      Wait until you're fifty years old. If your equipment is still working, you'll be celebrating too.

    4. Re:Umm... by savagedome · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember? Take a guess where this post is coming from ;)

    5. Re:Umm... by orkysoft · · Score: 3, Funny

      A keyboard with a PS/2 style plug?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    6. Re:Umm... by sjaskow · · Score: 1

      Yep, the first PC's I got paid maintain post college were 2 IBM PS/2 Model 30's and 1 PS/2 Model 60. IIRC they were 286/10's with 512K of memory and 20MB hard drives. And we paid almost $3,000 1989 dollars to upgrade them to 8MB each.

    7. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a model 30 and a until recently... idiot brother started playing around with the voltage switch on the back and "let the smoke out" of one of the chips on the motherboard... I made a nice clipboard out of it. Of course I've been using the keyboard on my shiny new athlon 2400...

    8. Re:Umm... by shadowj · · Score: 4, Funny
      Old?? The PS/2 series was introduced in 1987! That's not old! That's only... um....

      Damn, I'm old.

      --

      --Larry

      Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence

    9. Re:Umm... by tverbeek · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Remember the PS/2's? I remember looking forward to them!

      Perhaps the kid with his 2-year-old PS2 will have a greater appreciation for a functioning 20-year-old satellite when he has some gear of that age himself.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    10. Re:Umm... by grub · · Score: 1

      Oh bah, I'm only 12 years from that and can get hard looking at pictures of Rosanne Barr..

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    11. Re:Umm... by Grayputer · · Score: 1

      Since we started using Microsoft software (sorry couldn't resist).

    12. Re:Umm... by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Damn! That was going to be my guess. Now I'll have to go with a mouse with a PS/2 style plug, assuming the last thing you did to the post was click "post". *hopes he doesn't use keyboard shortcuts...*

    13. Re:Umm... by red+floyd · · Score: 0

      Now that's just sick...

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    14. Re:Umm... by rvw14 · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I also remember the wonderful PS/1. Anyone else every suffer fixing one of these? (I "fixed" it with a sledge hammer)

    15. Re:Umm... by DR+SoB · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude anyone who says "dude" isn't that old...

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    16. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, really sick would have links to pictures of my Rosanne Barr RealDoll.

    17. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always think of the Evans and Sutherland "Picture System 2"

    18. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately I do. So I guess that means I'm an old fart too, but I'm not too old, since I can still remember them. Sounds almost like one of those, you know your old when... 'cept I can't quite remember how it goes.

    19. Re:Umm... by duanedv · · Score: 1

      OK, how many of you remember the Bally video game machine forhome users? It came with a 'cartridge' that let you 'program your own games' using a language called 'Palo Alto Tiny Basic'? The machine had a grand total of 1,800 bytes! And you could save this by dumping it to a voice tape recorder! (yes, you could reload from the tape also...at the amazing speed of 300 Bits per second). Ah, the REALLY old days! I believe this might have preceed the TRS 80. Unfortunately, Bally never understood the home market and the game machine died a slow death from neglect (at least that is how I perceived it) Duane

    20. Re:Umm... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      If your PS/2 is still working after 2 years that is something to celegrate. The damn drive allignment problem is horrid on those things.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    21. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only remember - still have one that works.

    22. Re:Umm... by Zakabog · · Score: 1

      PLEASE! Help me! I'm trying to figure out the time around when I got my first computer. It was a PS/2 486DX2 66MHz with 4 megs of ram (well 3300 K or something like that, not enough to run anything till I upgraded to a whopping 16 megs of ram.) And it has a 256MB hard drive, does anyone know around what year this could have come out? Every year I tell myself, I must have been using computers for 10 years...

    23. Re:Umm... by PiratePTG · · Score: 1
      I still think of IBM's old PS/2. Anyone else remember those?

      REMEMBER those??! I still HAVE two of 'em... I kept them from my father's pharmacy after he died and we sold the store. They each had a Lantastic networking card, a 13" amber monitor, and an Okidata printer. I think they each had a 5 meg drive and 640K of RAM in them.

      Yes, they both still work and are "displayed" in the bottom of my coffee table.

      --
      The number 1 problem of working in a cubicle - 23 power cords, 1 outlet...
    24. Re:Umm... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      Since when do we celebrate various equipment still working? Guess I better ready for my PS2's upcoming 2 year still working anniversary!

      Didn't IBM quit building those much longer than two years ago?

      The oldest PS/2, though, still isn't as old as my first Apple II (a IIe that got converted to a IIGS), which turns 20 next year...

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    25. Re:Umm... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      People brag about their BSD boxes uptime of months or a couple years. The satellite has not been pysically maintained for 20 years and still works. It's pretty impressive.

      -B

    26. Re:Umm... by snero3 · · Score: 1

      so that is what that thing is propping up my desk

      --
      It said "windows 98 or better" so I installed Linux
    27. Re:Umm... by Oopsz · · Score: 1

      1991-1992 ish. I had a 486DX2 @ 50mhz with 8 megs of ram and a 405 meg hard drive in early 1993, and it was pro-star. (That didn't stop me from overclocking it to a whopping 66mhz though)..

    28. Re:Umm... by WhiteDeath · · Score: 1

      we still seem to celebrate the continued operation of human beings after 21 years - and they are proven to be quite reliable at that point (well at least most of them).

    29. Re:Umm... by MaggieL · · Score: 1

      I used an IBM Model 30 once too. It was an IBM System/360 model 30, and had 64k. In an external chassis sold by a third party. About the size of a refrigerator.

      We're hoping the same aliens who fixed Oscar 7 pay a visit to Oscar 40 soon.

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    30. Re:Umm... by 3dfxoldtimer · · Score: 2, Funny

      So your "Equipment" still works but your eye sight is shot?

    31. Re:Umm... by richie2000 · · Score: 1
      I remember the wait for them, half a computer with half an operating system. This was back when Mordor was in Armonk, not Redmond or Lindon.

      How did that slogan go... Something like:

      Yesterday's computer today, today's operating system tomorrow.

      Yeah, that sounds about right. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    32. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of your arse?

    33. Re:Umm... by DR+SoB · · Score: 1

      Hard to believe but people are actually still running those things.. s/370 is even more common.. I debated buying one for my disco show, but realized you still had to license MVS for the stupid thing.. Who's going to pay $100,000 for an operating system for a DISCO?!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
    34. Re:Umm... by bob+dobalina · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't work in my office.

      --

      B

      "I'm payin' taxes, but what am I buyin'?" -- James Brown

    35. Re:Umm... by leifm · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm old enough to know that once you live with your girlfriend your gear doesn't get much use even if it is still working properly.

      --

      "Windows Me offers tremendous reliability and stability improvements..." -- Paul Thurott
  4. After it is /.ed (~60 meg video!) by mobby_6kl · · Score: 4, Funny

    [Insert obligatory "1982 web servsr" joke]

  5. Slashdotting imminent by capz+loc · · Score: 5, Funny

    With posting a 64-meg MPEG, I think we can be sure that their server won't have nearly the uptime of the satellite.

    1. Re:Slashdotting imminent by budhaboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's sort of funny watching my download speed (via cable modem) slowly drop... T-250KB/s... 249... 248.. Kind of reinforces the whole moment of a lift off...

    2. Re:Slashdotting imminent by slipgun · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a university site and they still couldn't survive a slashdotting!

      Posting an MPEG link direct to slashdot is the very definition of cruel :-)

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    3. Re:Slashdotting imminent by Gossy · · Score: 1

      Hmm, well I'm getting 900KB/s from my connection, so I don't think they're having too many problems.

    4. Re:Slashdotting imminent by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should put it up for bittorrent at BitTorrent Files for Slashdot Effect Victims

      --
      Phillip
  6. If it was... by SisyphusShrugged · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it was made twenty years ago, wouldnt it have to be 10,000 times larger than a modern computer and so expensive that only the five richest kings of Europe would own them.

    1. Re:If it was... by kfg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, it's, like, built around a Sinclair ZX80.

      KFG

    2. Re:If it was... by BTWR · · Score: 1

      yes... but could it be used for finding dates?

    3. Re:If it was... by SEE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well theoretically yes, but, the matches would be so perfect as to eliminate the thrill of romantic conquest.

    4. Re:If it was... by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Well theoretically yes, but the matches would be _so_ perfect, as to eliminate the thrill of romantic conquest! Nyer-Hey!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:If it was... by zero_offset · · Score: 1
      From the article:

      "And in the end of the year 1982, King Hesaphasaramubani, Plenipotent High Soverign Monarch of the Kingdom of Germany, did decree that the satellite would measure 5,000 cubits on a side, and would enjoy construction utilizing the finest woods from the oldest forests in the kingdom. Laborers slaved for six and twenty days, felling and milling the tallest trees, while craftsmen produced a fine "satellite" cabinet, with loving care. And so it came to be that this chugging steam-powered contraption was lofted into orbit by means of an enormous sling, jointly twirled overhead by the five strongest men, one each from the most powerful nations of Europe in that distant day."

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  7. Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by Rorschach1 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The Oscar 7 satellite was launched from the same place in 1974. It spent about 20 years dead in space after its batteries shorted, before it started working again out of the blue.

    Incidentally, that launch pad is about 3 miles from where I'm sitting. I can see it if I climb up on the antenna tower on the roof, but management got mad last time I did that to watch a launch.

    1. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by PPGMD · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oscar 7 was fixed by aliens. Sort of like the Spirit Rover. http://klydemorris.com/strips.cfm?strip_ID=1240

    2. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      Hey, are you at the ILSC on North Base?

      I used to climb the towers on the roof to watch the MMIII launches from the LFs near Minuteman beach.


      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    3. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      12000 (30SCS HQ), off Airfield.

    4. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by ThomK · · Score: 1

      Very cool post, how do I become a satellite hobbyist?

      --

      TK

    5. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by Rorschach1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      See http://www.amsat.org/. Some of the satellites are very easy to work - I've talked to NO-44 with a handheld before.

    6. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by boomgopher · · Score: 1

      Cool, I used to work down the street at the 576th. Have fun out there.

      --
      Your hybrid is not saving the environment. Its purpose is to make you feel good about buying something.
    7. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by jelle · · Score: 1

      "I've talked to NO-44 with a handheld before."

      Um interesting, but: what did it say back? "beep"?

      Or do these satellites collect interesting data, or is it used enough to talk with others that are using it at the same time?

      In other words: What is fun about it? I hope it's not just 'hey look, I just made a relay in space say click'.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    8. Re:Not quite as amazing as Oscar 7 by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Yes, the majority of Amateur satellites are communications satellites and thus, made for communication. Go read the website.

      --
      +++OK ATH
  8. 1984 by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey, some of us remember 1984, you insensitive clod!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:1984 by trick-knee · · Score: 3, Funny

      > Hey, some of us remember 1984,

      yeah, and what was that crack about hairstyles supposed to mean? I still look like that.

    2. Re:1984 by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I still look like that.

      I bet most of those rocket scientists do, too. :)

    3. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I still look like that.

      Let me guess.. you're an engineer or a computer geek..

    4. Re:1984 by mhayenga · · Score: 1

      Of course we do...

      the year after I was born... :)

    5. Re:1984 by red+floyd · · Score: 1

      Loved the ADM-5 terminal. Used to use those and ADM-3A terminals in the Crown Stat Lab up at UC Santa Cruz.

      --
      The only reason we have the rights we have is that people just like us died to gain those rights. -- Cheerio Boy
    6. Re:1984 by joebok · · Score: 1

      I just wish I looked like that - back in the day I still had hair to style!

    7. Re:1984 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were born in the 1980s and already know how to write?

      Damn, time flies and apparently I'm entirely too fucking old. :P

    8. Re:1984 by digital+bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      I must say, 1984 sure was a double-plus-good year.

      --
      find / -name "*.sig" | xargs rm
    9. Re:1984 by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      Loved the ADM-5's. I think the very first PC I every saw was an IMSAI 8080 with an ADM-5. At that point it was like a little piece of the future plopped into the middle (okay, late part) of the 70's.

    10. Re:1984 by Sethus · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't I remember some apple ad that was super popular back in 1984? Something about the book :O Commercial

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
  9. Bad press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Things like this should be publicized much more than the stupid mistakes NASA makes. It's hard to keep a car running 20 years even with a constant supply of oil and maintanence work. This is much cooler, and deserves more media attention than a mixing up of metric and Imperial measurements (all though the mixups are STILL important). Eh, just a quick rant.

    1. Re:Bad press by jsebrech · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, this would be more akin to keeping a computer running for 20 years non-stop, without ever having to manually powercycle it, and without replacing a single piece of hardware, in the middle of antarctica. Much more impressive that just doing good car maintenance.

      Still, I think it's pretty sad that computers are even more frail than we humans are. For ages most of what we built outlasted us; now the tables have turned.

  10. So... by TWX · · Score: 1

    ... what did they do right that Skylab did wrong? Except not be a part of NASA, of course...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:So... by ixplodestuff8 · · Score: 0, Insightful

      That was a satellite, skylab was a station, you're comparing apples and oranges

  11. Lame song..... by ThomasFlip · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That has to be the absolute most lamest song I have ever heard in all my time on the Internet. It's a cross between New Order and a rocket science textbook.

    --
    If the dollar is an "I owe you nothing", then the Euro is a "Who owes you nothing." - Doug Casey
    1. Re:Lame song..... by donnyfire · · Score: 1

      And yet it was a smash hit in the mid-'80s, recieving quite a bit of airtime on MTV and the radio.

    2. Re:Lame song..... by satanami69 · · Score: 1
      --
      I really hate Dan Patrick.
  12. 20 years uptime by vpscolo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now if we had hardware/software that could do that you could truely run a business with 100% SLA. Of course if you had a bewoulf of these... ...I'll get me coat

    Rus

    1. Re:20 years uptime by protohiro1 · · Score: 1

      I think that's the first Fast Show reference I've seen on slashdot. Very amusing that show. Not a bad place for a reference. (I'd mod it +1 funny) But I think, in the interest of all we ought to make that the LAST Fast Show reference on slashdot. You know how these things get out of hand here.

      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
    2. Re:20 years uptime by real_smiff · · Score: 1

      A. just what i was thinking, Fast Show. such a refreshing change for /. I wish this *would* catch on.. lots of things from that show get funnier with repeated use... like "this week, i have been mostly eating...".. or "...which was nice". but then, even if we could be funny, 99% of /. wouldn't get it :/. i'll get me coat. haha.

      --

      This is my Sig, this is my Gun. One is for Slashdot and one is for Fun.

    3. Re:20 years uptime by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Oh heck, who cares. Fast Show jokes are perfect for /., I myself don't care for unwashed masses. This week I have been mostly eating yogurt.

    4. Re:20 years uptime by troc · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago my slashdot sig was

      This week I have been mostl reading slashdot

      so I feel I's have to say

      Oi! M1FCJ! No! I can put up with your stupid inane comments on Slashdot but what's with that banal and idiotic name?

      (the unrighteous brothers before I start a flame war :)

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    5. Re:20 years uptime by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      Ham radio call sign. Makes quite sense to me. :-) Are you familiar with amateur radio service? It's quite fun. :P

  13. What exactly does it do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I'm 'working' from home as we speak, but I'm not doing one damn thing useful.

  14. hair? by Matey-O · · Score: 4, Funny

    "and the haircuts of 1984"

    Those are not 1984 haircuts....Flock of Seagulls had 1984 haircuts....these are the haircuts of people that don't give a lot of wattage to personal apperance.

    If they were closer to New York, we could give the Fab 5 a call! (http://bravotv.com/Queer_Eye_for_the_Straight_Guy /)

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were closer to New York, we could give the Fab 5 a call! (http://bravotv.com/Queer_Eye_for_the_Straight_Guy /)

      I thought the Fab 5 were Michigan U basketball players fron the early '90s. Chris Webber, Juann Howard, et al.

    2. Re:hair? by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      >Those are not 1984 haircuts....Flock of Seagulls had 1984 haircuts....these are the haircuts of people that don't give a lot of wattage to personal apperance.

      I'll probably pay dearly for this, but some of our network guys look just like that... and not the old ones. 'Course they do have Ipods to go with the hair and glasses.

      I'm not old, but I do remember lists of stuff you could do while your C64 booted
      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    3. Re:hair? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      I thought the Fab 5 were Michigan U basketball players fron the early '90s. Chris Webber, Juann Howard, et al.

      Nah, those guys were fags.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:hair? by grozzie2 · · Score: 1
      these are the haircuts of people that don't give a lot of wattage to personal apperance.

      The video is actual footage of folks that built and launched a satellite 20 years ago, one that's still in orbit, and still functional. That's a _serious_ technical achievement. And you are more concerned about the haircuts?

      I thought /. was a place to get away from clueless managers...

    5. Re:hair? by Fizzl · · Score: 1

      I'm not old, but I do remember lists of stuff you could do while your C64 booted

      Like what?
      1. Blink an eye
      2. ... (?)

      Now, lets talk about the lists what to do while switching town in ultima IV. ;)

    6. Re:hair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you should go out and buy a sence of humor, the original post mentioned 1984 haircuts.

  15. Landsat 5's birthday, too ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.spaceimagingme.com/content/Constellatio n/Landsat/index.asp

    Launch Date March 1, 1984
    Launch Vehicle Delta 3920
    Launch Location Vandenberg Air Force Base, California
    Weight 1938 kg

    Pheakin' bird was inctruckingcredibly sturdy.

    1. Re:Landsat 5's birthday, too ... by cje · · Score: 1

      Pheakin' bird was inctruckingcredibly sturdy.

      Was? It's still sending down data to us every day.

      --
      We're going down, in a spiral to the ground
    2. Re:Landsat 5's birthday, too ... by JeremyALogan · · Score: 0

      and in related news: hyperlinks were invented about 20 years ago too... and they STILL WORK

      for the lazy

  16. Watching a slashdot happen... by Dracolytch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Kinda cool, actually...

    Downloading at: 45 KBps

    30 seconds later...

    Downloading at: 40 KBps

    20 seconds later...

    Downloading at: 35 KBps

    The race is on! Will I get the file before the server dies?!?

    ~D

    --
    This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    1. Re:Watching a slashdot happen... by PPGMD · · Score: 1

      Holding steady at 93KBps. While watching the WMV.

    2. Re:Watching a slashdot happen... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1
      The race is on! Will I get the file before the server dies?!?

      Old joke:

      A statistician and his friend are flying aboard a 747 from London to New York. An hour or so out of La Guardia, the captain comes on to the loudspeakers.
      "Folks, I'm just letting you know that we've lost an engine. There's nothing to worry about; we've got three more. However, we've lost a bit of airspeed, so our revised ETA is in two hours."

      The pair shrugged off the announcement and settled back in their seats. A few minutes later they heard a loud bang, and the captain once again addressed the passengers.
      "Hello folks, this is your Captain speaking. That little noise was our number three engine. No worries, we still have two more. But we're down a bit more speed, so we'll be at La Guardia in four hours."

      The statistician grew contemplative, while his friend started to get a bit nervous. Wouldn't you know it, but there was a thump, and the captain once again came on the air. He started to sound a bit anxious this time around...
      "Uh, folks...we seem to have lost the number one engine. I'm afraid it's going to take us another six and a half hours to make New York."

      With that, the statistician's companion started fidgeting obsessively. The statistician turned to him and said,
      "Yeah, I know how you feel. If we lose that last engine, we'll never land." "

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  17. Life expectancy by milgr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what is the life expectancy for this satelite?

    --
    Where law ends, tyranny begins -- William Pitt
    1. Re:Life expectancy by MMaestro · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think the question should be, "what was the life expectancy for this satellite?"

    2. Re:Life expectancy by dannycarroll · · Score: 1

      Probably a whole lot more than the server...

    3. Re:Life expectancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an emailed response from one of the Landsat 5 scientists today (1 March 2004). I reminded him that L5 was launched 20 years ago today. (Landsat 5 was launched on the same rocket as UOSAT-2). "L5" is still working twenty years later.

      Ha! I forgot it! Thanks. Even tho it has shutter sync problem, it is still working after 20 years!! Amazing! I remember that one of the big discussions at the critical design review was the calculation for the reliability and lifetime requirement of three whole years! GE had it at 0.95 (or so) probability to last 3 years. Reliability calculations are certainly not very reliable.

  18. TORRENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Torren of the WMV file HERE.

    This service brought to your courtesy of Soup, Bread, Linux.

    1. Re:TORRENT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on, this is slashdot. a torrent of the MPEG... or NOTHING! yeah take that MS! (i'll fight ya on my own) :p

  19. Mirror by patdabiker · · Score: 5, Informative

    I posted a mirror of the video here.

  20. Re:FIRST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I must post this anonymously.

    I was a junior engineer on the UoSAT-2/UO-11 project. Early into the project a group of military people visited us. We were asked various odd questions. This exchange in particular remains strong in my memory:
    Military Man: Can we mount a laser into this satellite?
    My Boss: No way, that'd require a lot of reenforcement of the tube chamber (back then we didn't have solid state).
    Military Man: You could compensate with more fuel for launch. I'll approve it myself.
    My Boss: But.. a laser? What size are you talking about and for what?
    Military Man: [leans to assistant, whispers back and forth] We can tell you but your juniors [myself and 2 co-workers] will have to leave. [we did]

    my boss left the project immediately and worked on a secret payload project overseen by the military. Whatever that bird has in it, it's looking down at us.

  21. Not only do I remember the PS/2, ... by burgburgburg · · Score: 4, Funny
    and not only do I remember the commercials featuring Jamie Farr (of MASH fame), but I even have a PS/2 t-shirt (in great condition).

    I had to explain to my wife that wearing it didn't mean I was old: it meant I was being post-ironic.

    1. Re:Not only do I remember the PS/2, ... by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, post-ironic is telivision's TJ Hooker trying to sell Vic-20's to the group that he just recently admonished to " GET A LIFE! "!!!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    2. Re:Not only do I remember the PS/2, ... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Actually it was most of the MASH crew advertising them. It was a pretty slick ad campaign for the time, too, the magazine layouts, the television commercials, everything was just beautifully done.

  22. Fashion statement by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 5, Funny
    Thrill to the computers, the clothes, and the haircuts of 1984.

    Although we can be reasonably well-assured that the computers were state-of-the-art at the time, the clothes and haircuts are another matter. Please remember that these are professional geeks we're talking about, and are therefore not exactly cutting edge when it comes to fashion. To all appearances it was closer to 1978 than 1984.

    I know this because I was in college in 1984, and we all looked great, but these guys look like dorks.

    --
    And the brethren went away edified.
    1. Re:Fashion statement by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

      I am not convinced you should be self assured that the computers were state of the art either. When you have an expensive project like that, you generally want to keep unknowns to a minumum, so you tend to reuse computers that have proven reliable in the past and they are generally speced out years before launch regardless. Either way they are still gauranteed to be a few years old minimum.
      From the looks of it, the same formula was applied to the haircuts.

      --
      I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
    2. Re:Fashion statement by jazman_777 · · Score: 1
      Although we can be reasonably well-assured that the computers were state-of-the-art at the time, the clothes and haircuts are another matter. Please remember that these are professional geeks we're talking about, and are therefore not exactly cutting edge when it comes to fashion....I know this because I was in college in 1984, and we all looked great, but these guys look like dorks.

      In five years, this will be the style for everyone, the way fashions go, so they _are_ cutting edge.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    3. Re:Fashion statement by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 1

      To be fair, we didn't actually see any computers. The kind of machine you'd use back then for launch ops, or even for satellite q/a, did not fit on a desktop.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    4. Re:Fashion statement by bbc22405 · · Score: 1
      Although we can be reasonably well-assured that the computers were state-of-the-art at the time

      Actually, the one computer that I thought I recognized in the video was an Apple II. That would have hardly been "state-of-the-art" by 1984, though probably it was appropriate technology (i.e. rugged, cheap, well-understood).

    5. Re:Fashion statement by iocat · · Score: 1

      The Apple II was still fairly state of the art in '84, if not cutting edge (it was used a lot in home and small office/lab scenarios, while CPM dominated larger offices, although it was rapidly losing share to that IBM with its fancy PC-DOS, which was a clone of CPM made by some company in Seattle). It wasn't cheap then, either, costing well more than a C64, TRS-80, Vic, or other hobbiest computer. '84 was the year the //c came out, and well before the GS came out. Apple even still sold the IIe until around 2000.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    6. Re:Fashion statement by andygrace · · Score: 1

      You definitely can see a BBC Micro - probably a model B. White computer with black keyboard and red function keys.

      A very popular computer in the UK and also Australia at the time. Designed by Acorn, the people who later made RISC chips and the team behind ARM/Acorn Risc Machines - as in StrongARM. Oh and BBC as in THE British Broadcasting Corporation. Designed to accompany a great TV show on the BBC called simply, The Computer Programme.

  23. Pretty amazing.. by brain1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Considering that batteries die with age, solar panels degrade with exposure, and radiation of all sorts bombard the spacecraft. Also you have to have fuel to station keep, and it is only recently that ion thrusters have become available that dont require a lot of reaction mass to operate.

    20 years of operation in the harsh environment of space gets my applause.

    1. Re:Pretty amazing.. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From a linked page: Jan King, W3GEY reports AO-7 is almost certainly running only off the solar panels. It is very likely to be on only when in the sun and off in eclipse. Therefore, AO-7 will reset each orbit and may not turn on each time.

      The batteries have probably gone, but the fact that the rest of it is still operating is amazing.

      I notice it has a CCD camera but I've been unable to find any pictures. Does anyone know if it is operational?

    2. Re:Pretty amazing.. by brain1 · · Score: 1

      Made a few CW contacts through AO-6 way long ago, but havent put together a setup for the newer birds. Hmmm gotta do something about that...

  24. 1984 was so long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Duke Nukem: Forever was only 3 years into development.

    1. Re:1984 was so long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :)

      And AmigaOS 4.0 was "on schedule and rocking".

      (Please ignore that the Amiga and AmigaOS 1.0 was just about to be invented in 1984, not that uninteresting trivia like physical impossibilities ever bothered the latest trademark mismanagers).

    2. Re:1984 was so long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh ignor 1.0 that was just the pre-alpha leak...

  25. 20 years alright by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Funny

    and we recently found launch footage

    Unfortunately they forgot to update the server it was originally hosted on way back in the day.

  26. I send this to you for your approval... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HALP! I've been kidnapped by the NAZI Bush regime!!!! -- Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Lawful President of the Soverign nation of Hati

  27. Magnet links? by WeblionX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why do most sites that host large images/movies not supply magnet links? It'd save them loads on bandwidth and people could stop making jokes about the server.

    (Not that I'm complaining about downloading at 215KB/s from the server..)

    --
    (\(\
    (=_=) Bani!
    (")")
  28. Re:FIRST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, really, we believe you!

    err..

  29. Re:FIRST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I, too, must post this anonymously.

    I was that Military Man. The project to which you refer was the 'Alan Parsons Project'. We were going to put a jumbo 'laser' on the moon as part of a world domination plan. Didn't work out for some reason, I think a British agent foiled the plan or something.

  30. 20 years is nothing. by Gavin+Scott · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What about the amazing story of the Amateur Radio satallite Ostcar 7 that was launched in 1974, operated for six years, then died due to a shorted battery, only to re-awaken from the dead in 2002 after 21 years of silence.

    So we have satellites that work after having been dead longer than your satellites have been alive.

    Nyeah.

    G.

  31. I can do better than that! by nhaines · · Score: 1

    Wow, that server went down in flames in record time! I hope they weren't serving that video off the satellite. ;)

  32. Re:I bet.....and you lose by Captain+Sensible · · Score: 5, Informative

    UoSat is not a NASA satellite. It was built and is controlled by the University of Surrey (england to the geographically challenged). It carries ham radio gear and a store-and-forward repeater for NGOs in third world nations.

  33. Speech Synthesiser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From here:
    "Payloads [...] Speech Synthesiser"

    What good will that do a satellite in orbit?

  34. Satellite goes up... by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 1

    ... webserver goes crashing down. She hasn't impacted yet, but she's burnin' up in the atmosphere as I type!

    I just hope the satellite's not being controlled from that poor box....

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  35. They don't make things like they used to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen anything built in the past 10 years that had an uptime of 20 years like this satellite.

  36. Just to clarify... by Rico_za · · Score: 5, Informative

    UoSAT-2 was not a Nasa mission. It was built by Surrey Satellite Technology Ltd in Guildford, a University town just west of London. We've grown quite a bit since then. We specialize in building small satellites (think 100 kgs, not 1000's of kgs). It's a different way of doing things to the way NASA and ESA usually does, but it's catching on.

    1. Re:Just to clarify... by bobbis.u · · Score: 1

      Wasn't the monitoring done from a little room in the university electronics department? If so, is it still there? I think I went to see that when I was about 12 and I was a bit unimpressed to be honest (I guess I was expecing a NASA control room).

    2. Re:Just to clarify... by Rico_za · · Score: 1

      It was, but now we have a "proper" mission control with a nice big plasma screen showing the orbits of all the satellites. Come and have a look again, you'll be impressed (I think).

  37. Soundtrack? by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    Anyone happen to know which song plays on the video? It's actually quite good ...

    1. Re:Soundtrack? by wodelltech · · Score: 2, Informative

      David Bowie - Major Tom
      http://www.maxlyrics.com/songView/9757

      --
      Your monitor is staring at you.
    2. Re:Soundtrack? by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      thanks!

    3. Re:Soundtrack? by grumling · · Score: 1

      Nope. Not David Bowie. This guy.

      --
      "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  38. Congrats! But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    ...doesn't it just beep?! WooHoo!!

    Ground Control: Can you here me now?

    UoSAT-2/UO-11: BEEP!!

    Ground Control: Gooood!

  39. Mr Moderator... by gomel · · Score: 0

    You are the troll here!
    now i will have to meta-moderate for the next couple of hours to find and bring this parent-post back to the surface.

    --
    Fight Frist Psoting!
    Browse Slashdot with 'Newest First'!
  40. An Acorn BBC computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That's an Acorn BBC computer! (see 1st and 3rd picture from the top) Who'da thought I'd ever see one of those beauties again. 32 whopping KB of RAM and a Basic interpreter. Some of my best coding memories was on the 'beeb'!

    1. Re:An Acorn BBC computer by Catmeat · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if it's the case with this satellite, but the early UoSats formatted the data for the downlink in a way similar to the casette tape format for the BBC computer. The result was that if you had a receiver that could tune into the right frequency, you could plug it into the approproate oriface on a BBC, load up the right software (from tape, nach) and bingo!You're getting the satellite's telemetry.

      I wonder if it's still worth trying... probably need to find a BBC on eBay first.

  41. Re:FIRST POST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFL. that's the 3rd best reply ever on /. well done. (why the AC? afraid of getting marked flame?)

  42. How much has changed? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "Thrill to the computers, the clothes, and the haircuts of 1984."

    I wonder if those same clothes, computers and haircuts are still in use at NASA...

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  43. song title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Major Tom (Coming Home) - Peter Schilling

  44. Tremendous achievement... by Cerberus9 · · Score: 1

    Imagine that, someone put up a satellite a whole 2 years before Mir went operational, and it's still there three and a half years after Mir was decommissioned.

    Let me know if the ISS is still in one peice in 2017; then I'll be impressed.

  45. Re:FIRST POST! by slipgun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now listen to me, sonny. I work for the SIS, and I don't want you to ever repeat this story again. What happened was secret then, and is now. You may find your life getting a little more difficult if you tell anyone else, you see what I mean? Keep quiet.

    I've ordered Taco to pull your post immediately. Remember, if you tell anyone else, we'll find you. I hear Belmarsh isn't too pleasant at this time of year.

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
  46. Re:FIRST POST! by slipgun · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now listen to me, sonny. I work for the SIS, and I don't want you to ever repeat this story again. What happened was secret then, and is now. You may find your life getting a little more difficult if you tell anyone else, you see what I mean? Keep quiet.

    I've ordered Taco to pull your post immediately. Remember, if you tell anyone else, we'll find you. I hear Belmarsh isn't too pleasant at this time of year.


    DAMN, I meant to post that anonymously. Now identity as a top-level agent trying to infilitrate Slashdot has been revealed.

    --
    SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
  47. Is this a big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a big deal? I ask, because,I don't know. In 1984, there were many satalites in orbit. Are they all gone? Is this significant or is the footage just cool?

  48. Funky terminals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, that's a Lear Sielger ADM5 in some of those pictures. Cool! I have some of those here at my place. I think I'll go rub up against them right now.

  49. Oh sure.... by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

    Oh sure, a satellite that is hundreds of miles away from us gets a big listing just for turning 20. But my TI-35 calculator that's been working since 1983 gets no respect at all :)

    --
    -Cnik
  50. What about Iridium? by Aumaden · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the UoSAT-2/UO-11 is still functioning after 20 years, why was there such a rush to deorbit the Iridium satellite constellation?

    1. Re:What about Iridium? by WayneConrad · · Score: 2, Informative

      why was there such a rush to deorbit the Iridium satellite constellation?

      They are fairly large birds, large enough that pieces of them may reach the surface, so they much prefer to deorbit them under control than wait for them to fail and reenter wherever they will.

      Also, I recall hearing (but cannot confirm) that there is now an international treaty that puts some requirements on satellite operators to try to reduce the amount of space debris. One of the Motorolla guys on the Irridium project told me that each bird has a command-loss timer that, eventually, causes it to deorbit autonomously if nobody has talked to it for a long time. This is all hearsay; it'd be nice to hear from someone who actually knows something.

    2. Re:What about Iridium? by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative

      One reason was that they were a big pain in the butt for optical and radio astronomers. The sooner they were gone, the better. The satellites are still up there, and I assume the astronomers still wish they would go away.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:What about Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The u.s. military uses Iridium, I make calls to iridium phones on a daily basis.

    4. Re:What about Iridium? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is all hearsay; it'd be nice to hear from someone who actually knows something.
      You're new here, aren't you?

  51. Landsat 5 by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, as long as we're celebrating, today is the 20th anniversary of the launch of Landsat 5. If you want to talk about a work horse, it has been returning Earth observation data used by scientists everywhere for two decades as well. It just might outlive its successor.

    Landsat 5

    1. Re:Landsat 5 by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 1

      UO-11 and Landsat-5 were launched together on a Delta rocket from the Western Test Range at Vandenberg Air Force Base, Lompoc, California. (info from AMSAT)

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  52. Oldest working Satellite is 30 years by Stalke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This satellite is barely past middle age. A quick google search finds that AO-7 is the oldest working satellite and it will turn 30 this year. Mark your calendars boys and girls. November 15 is the day when the _real_ excitement starts. I'm starting an iCal shared calendar right now so I don't forget it!

    --
    -?-
    1. Re:Oldest working Satellite is 30 years by masterofsw · · Score: 1

      Actually, there are many older Military Payloads on orbit. Here is one article.

    2. Re:Oldest working Satellite is 30 years by NateTech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He said *working satellite*.

      Pay attention, there's going to be a test.

      --
      +++OK ATH
    3. Re:Oldest working Satellite is 30 years by sharkman67 · · Score: 1

      Actually he should have said amateur radio satellite. Just remember these sats were built by ham radio operators not governments or big corporations. They are built by donations from other hams on shoe string budgets. Check out http://www.amsat.org . There are two new birds being built now that we are trying to pay for and get up in the air.

    4. Re:Oldest working Satellite is 30 years by sharkman67 · · Score: 1

      Where are you going to post your iCal?

  53. RIAA sued your pants off yet? by mscalora · · Score: 1

    Hasn't the UK arm of the RIAA sued your pants off yet? The music on the video sounds familiar.

  54. Pioneer 6 is 38 years old now! by enosys · · Score: 2, Informative

    NASA's Pioneer 6 was launched on December 16, 1965. It was contacted in December 2000, when it was 35 years old. NASA doesn maintain regular contact with it but it's quite possible it's still functional. It was designed for a six-month mission to study the solar wind, magnetic field and cosmic rays. It is in solar orbit at about 0.8 AU.

    1. Re:Pioneer 6 is 38 years old now! by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Is this is a satellite though? Just curious.

    2. Re:Pioneer 6 is 38 years old now! by cavac · · Score: 1

      Well, it's a space probe in a solar orbit, so you could say it's a satellite of the sun...

      Anyway, AFAIK they didn't contact it per se, they only listened for and recieved its telemetry.

      --
      Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  55. well by Dr.Knackerator · · Score: 1

    thats a BBC model B home computer on the left in the first shot, whats on the right? IIRC it looks like a Prime terminal if anybody here is old enough to remember them!

    1. Re:well by sapbasisnerd · · Score: 1

      It looks very much like a Lear Siegler ADM 5 terminal, could have been hooked to just about anything.

  56. Re:I bet.....and you lose by amembleton · · Score: 1

    I was going to say, in that video I saw one of the guys wearing a badge with the outline of Britian on it, and a Union Jack.

    Also, did anyone notice the BBC Micro at the beginning of the video? They bring back memories, its what I learnt to program on, back in the day when you could get kids books on how to program from the library. Mind you, I also learnt about GOTOs and used them far too much.

  57. AMSAT-UK is issuing special QSL cards by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 4, Interesting

    AMSAT-UK is issuing 1000 special edition QSL cards to radio amateurs world-wide that submit signal/reception reports from the satellite during the month of March. Super-special edition QSL cards are given to radio amateurs who submit signal reports on March 1 (today), the satellite's anniversay.

    For the non-ham-operators among us, a QSL card (not SQL) is basically a post-card that hams send each other after making contact.

    So earlier today, remembering that I had read about the March 1st QSL cards, I pulled up my handy sat prediction software (PREDICT) along with the equally handy gsat client, updated keplerian elements, synced my pc's time so I could achieve the most accurate predictions possible.

    Had a good pass of UO-11 with about 50 degrees at elevation at 3:45 this afternoon (20:45 UTC) ... went out to the jeep and hooked my quad-band Yaesu VX-7R into a 5/8th wave magmount antenna (2-meter band) hoping to get the best possible reception I could with my gear. Adjusted for frequency doppler, and BAM! There it was... I had UO-11's telemetry on 145.825 ... got nice and loud during mid-pass ... record a WAV file of the telemetry when the signal was at it's best. When the sat was exiting my half of north america, I was still faintly hearing the telemetry on 145.820, adjusted down for doppler.

    So, of course, I submitted my signal report to AMSAT-UK this afternoon. They're going to verify my data, and I get a gold star when they're done. Today, I reached a new pinnacle of geekdom. Long live the hams!

    de N1ZPP

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    1. Re:AMSAT-UK is issuing special QSL cards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations from another ham -- in another special (if randomly-selected) subset of the community you happen to occupy. ;) I would've loved to have given it a shot, but no rig!

      de N1KZZ

  58. Microsoft Platform by amembleton · · Score: 1

    According to this page from Surrey Satellite Systems, UoSAT-2 runs on a Microsoft platform. Doesn't that make it an evil entity on slashdot?

    1. Re:Microsoft Platform by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      No, it just means we need to find out how many times it's been rebooted.

  59. +1 Funny (Re:Microsoft Platform) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 Funny

  60. Absolutely magnificent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just downloaded the 56MB mpeg, and had to watch it twice. As they say in Britain: "BRILLIANT!"

    I don't know what people are complaining about re bandwidth, I had a steady 130+kb, and the whole thing came down in just under 7 minutes.

    The guys who put this together did an absolutely marvelous job. Who says engineers dont have a sense of humor (except maybe volkswagon owners).

    I'd rather see this get an MTV award that JJ's titties anyday.

    BTW: Most of that equipment brought back many nostalgic memories of sweating over dumb terminals, rewiring tty and serial links, fuming over line printer repair and maintance (remember those things, weighed as much as a 747, and about as loud).

  61. 1984? by marinebane · · Score: 1

    It would be too Ironic if this was a spy sattelite, being launched in 1984 and all...

  62. Re:FIRST POST! by TheSync · · Score: 1

    Yes, the laser was capable of vaporizing a man-sized object from space. The perfect "peacetime weapon." And let me tell you, there hasn't been a new working weapon since Korea.

    Unfortunately, on its first test shot, the laser went off target and accidently destroyed a house by setting off a large charge of popcorn, then it melted down. Everybody wants to the rule the world!

  63. Re:I bet.....and you lose by vyzar · · Score: 1

    I certainly noticed! Those Beebs were great machinea for their time. You could do so much with them, and interface with practically anything!

    I've still got my Beeb up in the loft. Last time I tried it (last year) it still worked too! Can't say that about many 20+ year old computers!

    I must dig it out again, and fire up Elite!

  64. What?? No reboots for patches?? by Raindeer · · Score: 1

    If it runs for twenty years, think of all the service packs and bug fixes they had to install. If I understand you correctly, then you mean that there is a computer system that can be patched without being rebooted. Well, that would be the greatest thing since sliced bread!

  65. UoSAT-2 video by nk6k · · Score: 1

    I made this video, way back when. Very tediously, as I recall, the jvc editing system I was using (rented at $20/hr, I think) wasn't meant for music videos. The music is skewed from the images a bit on this mpeg version of a 3rd generation copy, so you don't get the crisp cuts that the original had, but the quality is quite good, considering. Anyway, the back story of the video was that UoSAT-2 was "lost" shortly after launch - the transmitter was off and it we couldn't make contact, making the words of the song relevant to those of us who had worked 24 hours a day to get it ready. I worked on the UoSat-2 DCE (digital communications experiment) one of the first non-military store and forward communications systems. After about 10 weeks, communications was established through sheer tenaciousness by the command crew (Neville Bean). A three instruction program was written in the DCE to bypass a failed command data path, and UoSAT-2 has been in business ever since. The whole thing made for great stories, damaging a big radio telescope trying to track fast enough to hear the local oscillator on the receiver (it did), talking the British truck driver into letting me drive the spacecraft from LAX to Vandenberg because he kept trying to shift the rented truck with the break instead of the clutch (I had to let him drive my new Firebird), etc. There is an in-joke every 10 seconds, though I haven't written them down in 20 years. Maybe next anniversary. To answer the usual question, the main processor is an 1802, the DCE has an NEC800 Z80/like processor. No Unix. - Harold

  66. MOD PARENT DOWN by richi · · Score: 1

    Utter tripe. For one, we don't say "tube" in the UK (UoSAT-2 is British).