Slashdot Mirror


Comcast Signs Deal To Acquire TechTV

FPCat writes "Comcast has purchased TechTV. They plan to merge the station with G4. Maybe they'll stop showing Robot Wars and put some decent shows on instead. In either case, with Leo Laporte no longer hosting The Screen Savers, I expect big changes on the station..." (Of course, at this point they've only agreed to buy.)

86 of 396 comments (clear)

  1. Heh. by outZider · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, because as we all know, Comcast means Quality.

    --
    - oZ
    // i am here.
    1. Re:Heh. by t0qer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, because as we all know, Comcast means Quality.

      I know you're trying to kid around about comcast, but despite all the horror stories i've heard about their cable modem offerings, i've had nothing but "good service" from them.

      I used to have pacbell DSL. Routinely I would come home to find that stupid green light blinking while the damn thing tried to keep a connection. Sometimes it would go out for 3 or 4 days, any you would think pacbell would have prorated my bill due to service disruptions, never happened. Everytime I would call them I could never get a human without going through some hellish voicemail maze that some sado masochist set up.

      Comcast on the other hand, i've only experienced maybe 1 or 2 short outages that would last no longer than a few seconds at the most. On top of that they bumped everyone up to 3mbps now.

      Also, pacbell techs LIE. I was setting up a mandrake MNF vpn to one of my customers remote offices. Supposidly they had been set up on static IP's, and the pacbell tech that set it up charged them for that type of setup. After a few hours of trying to replace their linksys with the MNF and pings timing out, I discovered the truth by peeking inside the linksys... The tech had lied, there was no static IP's allocated to that line. Yet he charged them for it anyways.

      So even though you got a funny on that comment, it's the truth. Compared to pacbell (which may not really be "quality" to begin with) comcast is quality.

  2. TechTV should be on regular cable. by emo+boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There. I've said my piece.

  3. Well this brings about a few good changes by chadamir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) I will finally have techtv again on comcast 2) Techtv will have more funding which will provide for better programming. I guess when you can't buy disney the only thing left to do is buy techtv. It's a sad world we live in when megaconglomerates can't get everything theey want

    1. Re:Well this brings about a few good changes by DonGar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better programming.....

      That may mean that they pull Anime Unleashed for something with a more global appear. That would kill of 90% of the content I find interesting on all of DirecTV.

      Of course, maybe they will fix the guide information so that individual shows are listed based on the series they belong to, not just 'Anime Unleashed'. My TiVo will be much happier then.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
  4. Re:he hosted today? by SphericalCrusher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When they stop people from hosting, they let them finish everything they have planned first -- they just don't yank them off air. His time will probably be up in a few days to a week.

    --
    "Instant gratification takes too long." - Carrie Fisher
  5. Another [probable] blow to objective journalism... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...since Microsoft owns quite a chunk of Comcast, once this deal goes through you will have heard the last of any criticism of Microsoft or their products on TechTV.

  6. Show of the year by Hekatchu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps well soon see Super-X-killerBOT agaist Mickey Mouse Show.

  7. Re:Curious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody else have a weird feeling that Comcast is trying to buy out the entire world....

    Why yes... we are....

    Anyways... how much for your house and family??

  8. lineup by millahtime · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have some lineup show ideas.... 1) On Macs 2) Chicks of teck world 3) On open source 4) Hot chicks of the tech world in bathing suits 5) Cool new toys 6) Hot chicks of the tech world in bathing suits showing off cool new tech toys 7) A show of extreme dating meets tech folks (with hot chicks only) .....

    1. Re:lineup by BMonger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Paige Davis needs to host the new case mod show called...

      "Trading Cases".

    2. Re:lineup by willtsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, that was funny.

      But that would be interesting to see geeks swap their machines and individually upgrade them.

      Does GUI customization count as an upgrade. What about a new art of home case painting???? Workspaces and desks should be included.

      Perhaps it should be called "Trading (work) Stations".

      --
      -------- -------- Support Wesley Clark for president!!!
    3. Re:lineup by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...and she should be in a bikini

      (aww, frig! Now I'm showing my age!)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  9. It is to bad. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It is to bad that both of these stations just seem to stay very light on the true tech stuff. It would be nice if it were more like a discovery channel for tech stuff. Heck I would love a station that shows different algorithms, or different ways to do things in different languages. But Tech TV and G4 (Especially G4) just seemed like the Commercial Channel that advertises all that is l33t. Tech TV has a couple of good show but they were still laking. I guess that is why I watch Nasa TV.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:It is to bad. by David+Hume · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heck I would love a station that shows different algorithms, or different ways to do things in different languages.


      Now there is a recipe for high ratings.

    2. Re:It is to bad. by TCaptain · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd love this too, problem is that only maybe 10 people would watch it. :/

      The rest wouldn't even change to THAT channel..it would just hurt their brains too much.

      The lowest common denominator is just too damn low.

      --
      "I'm not a procrastinator, I'm temporally challenged"
    3. Re:It is to bad. by jonfelder · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck I would love a station that shows different algorithms, or different ways to do things in different languages.

      The problem is no one else would.

    4. Re:It is to bad. by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would be nice if it were more like a discovery channel for tech stuff.

      Er... TechTV is.

      What, you think Discovery Channel (and its progeny) are hardcore science/history/etc.? Please. I enjoy a lot of programs on those channels, but I also know they're about as well respected by "serious" historians and in-field scientists as The Screen Savers is respected by real techies.

    5. Re:It is to bad. by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean like Discovery used to be, before it turned into "all Monster Garage, all the time"? I don't dislike that show, or other new Discovery fare like Mythbusters, but what happened to the science? Discovery has gone downhill, though not as badly as TLC. *shudder*

      I can just see it: "Today, on GTechTV4...Trading Cases, where two sets of neighbors trade computers for the weekend and do a killer new mod on one box in each others' homes!"

      -Carolyn

      --
      Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
    6. Re:It is to bad. by FPCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd watch a show showing a shark killing an interior decorator

  10. "I'm into murders and executions." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Even though I only have basic cable, I have seen countless hours of TechTV and G4 when I had the chance. TechTV showed in 1 hour what G4 bloated into 8.

    G4 never had potential. Games are an interactive media. Why in God's name would you want to read news and view clips of other people playing games when you could be playing them yourself? Why wait 25 minutes see a review on a game you're curious about when you can go online and find it in 25 seconds?

    Hopefully this merger will in effect kill G4 completely and simply give TechTV a little more programming devoted to video games instead.

    But then again, you'll probably have to pay a premium channel fee to get this new 2-in-1 channel anyway.

    1. Re:"I'm into murders and executions." by daveo0331 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      G4 never had potential. Games are an interactive media. Why in God's name would you want to read news and view clips of other people playing games when you could be playing them yourself? Why wait 25 minutes see a review on a game you're curious about when you can go online and find it in 25 seconds?

      I agree, but wouldn't this criticism apply to a lot of other (successful) TV shows too? Why should I sit through 25 minutes of "news" stories I don't care about to see the one story I could have found in 25 seconds on an internet news site? Why sit through the Oscars when I can just look up the winners the next day on the web? Why watch an NBA game instead of going outside and actually playing basketball?

      TV doesn't have to be all that good, it just has to be good enough to grab your attention while channel surfing.

      --
      Remember the days when Republicans were the party of fiscal responsibility?
    2. Re:"I'm into murders and executions." by brkello · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why in God's name would you want to read news and view clips of other people playing games when you could be playing them yourself?

      Good point! Let's extend this further! Why would you want to read news and view clip of other people playing football/basketball/baseball when you could be playing them yourselves? That's why shows like ESPN will never catch on.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    3. Re:"I'm into murders and executions." by smcn · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why in God's name would you want to read news and view clips of other people playing games when you could be playing them yourself?

      I've never watched G4, but I did once have a subscription to IGN.com and the video previews were my favorite part. Sometimes screenshots just aren't enough.

      Why wait 25 minutes see a review on a game you're curious about when you can go online and find it in 25 seconds?

      That's an easy one: Not everyone who plays video games has internet access, the same way not everyone who goes to see movies has internet access. Why do you think Roger Ebert has been on TV for so many years?
  11. Please, please! by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let Adam Sessler be next to go!

    1. Re:Please, please! by Ayaress · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, Adam, yes. He acts like he's stoned, drunk, and/or dizzy all the time. But Martin? Come on, you can't get rid of him. What would a channel about the internet be without a show that mostly just talks about porno?

    2. Re:Please, please! by homerules · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need a better TV.

    3. Re:Please, please! by jgoemat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You have got to be kidding... Back when X-Play was Extended Play and before Morgan started annoying me with her voice it was a much better show. The comments were much more funny and you didn't have to put up with Morgan and Adam's annoying forced banter. Sure she has great honkers, but they could just review more games like DOA Volleyball to make up for it.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Re:Another [probable] blow to objective journalism by Knightmare · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You mean just like msnbc which covers all the anti microsoft stories just like the rest of the media?

  14. Finally! by Xoder · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some explanation to the Disney bid! I couldn't figure out why Comcast wanted a somewhat-struggling content provider in their portfolio, but now I see that They (as in MS) were looking for that key 3-12 year-old demographic.

    "Daddy, Mickey said that all Linux users are terrorists, and that I should kick you in the shins until you buy Windows 2600"

    --
    The previous sig has been removed due to /. protecting your best interests
  15. RobotWars by FrostedWheat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe they'll stop showing Robot Wars and put some decent shows on instead

    I dunno what Robot Wars your watching, but the UK one is a really good show. The only thing spoiling it now are the adverts! (It changed channels here, never used to have adverts before.)

  16. Merger FAQ from G4 by Blackwulf · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Merger FAQ from G4 by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      However, this G4 FAQ needs to be taken with a grain of salt because it appears to be written by G4 employees whose jobs are just as uncertain as TechTV employee jobs at this point. At a business level, G4 is not buying TechTV... Comcast is buying most TechTV from Vulcan Ventures, with Echostar being fussy and refusing to sell their shares in TechTV, Inc.

      That, and the FAQ really doesn't ammount to anything newsworthy. The listings of shows aren't exactly promises that any of the shows listed will continue or those left out will not, and the fact that the network's "headquarters" will be in L.A. just means that the PHBs will be located there. For example, CNN presently houses their executives and master control operations, but most of their weekday lineup is originating from New York City and Washington D.C. moreso than Altanta at this point. The content people don't always have to be at "headquarters".

      Another thing that the FAQ nicely dodges is whether the new network will be called "TechTV", "G4", or some other name.

  17. What concerns me most by JSDopefish · · Score: 5, Informative

    is that Comcast HATES HATES HATES DirecTV. G4 has never been on DirecTV because of that. Philadelphia Phillies games are never shown on DirecTV (at least not ones with Phillies coverage) because of their hatred of satellite.

    I really hope that it doesn't cause TechTV to disappear off DirecTV. I have about 6 shows with Season passes on my TiVo from TechTV. I'll be seriously pissed.

    In fact, I'm already pissed. I like TechTV just the way it is.

    --
    Joe Siegler
    Webmaster - 3D Realms & Black Sabbath Online
    1. Re:What concerns me most by Itsik · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Notice what the G4's CEO said "... This merger is a win for G4; a win for TechTV; and a win for our advertising and affiliate partners," I didn't see anything about viewers. In other words I suspect that your worries will turn out to be founded.

  18. This scares me by damniel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Does this mean I might lose tech tv on my Directv satellite? This just allows Comcast to come out, and charge enough for the programming that other providers(small cable companies,directv,dish network) cannot afford the programming. As these large companies such as Time Warner, Comcast etc., start buying up more interesting programming such as tech tv, I think we will start to see a homogenizing affect. Worst case, they may find that these channels don't generate enough ratings, to make big ad dollars, so they drop them, after they have been assimilated.

    1. Re:This scares me by leviramsey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Comcast Sports Net (the Baltimore-Washington-NoVa version, not the Philly version) is available on DirecTV. The crappy excuse for a channel called CN8 is not available on DirecTV, though.

      Small cable cos are in no danger, as they generally don't share markets with Comcast.

      Dish is in the dangerous position. DirecTV is harder to cut off, because if Comcast tries to cut DirecTV out, News Corp. will cut Comcast out of Fox News, Fox Sports Net, and network-owned affiliates. If Comcast in northern New Jersey, Connecticut, and Eastern Massachusetts loses Fox coverage of the Red Sox and Yankees in the ALCS while DirecTV buys ads in the various local newspapers saying, "You can't see the Red Sox square off against the Yankees on Comcast. Here are bars that subscribe to DirecTV that can show the games. Subscribers to Charter Cable, RCN, Cablevision, Time Warner Cable, DirecTV and other television providers are not affected." Comcast would lose a million homes easily from this. Playing hardball with Rupert Murdoch has not, historically, been a winning proposition.

      Dish, however, has no content portfolio to use against its competition as a bargaining chip. Conversely, there are content providers who have no distribution portfolio. This is why I'd expect to see, assuming the Disney deal goes through, GE (NBC) and Viacom (CBS) to buy Cox and Dish.

    2. Re:This scares me by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. TechTV has long-term deals with DirecTV, Dish Network, and nearly every cable operator (other than Comccast, interestingly) that would be mighty expensive to break. Any serious changes to TechTV will have to be signed-off by these players or there'd be the risk of a breach of contract lawsuit forming.

      That, and to buy TechTV, and then take it away from its existing distribution structure would be like buying a $300 million dollar toy, playing with it for a day, and then throwing it in the trash. There's not much value in taking TechTV and then making it as weak as G4 is today...

  19. Re:he hosted today? by forand · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did you read the link in the blurb? Oh yeah this is /. The link says that Leo wanted to leave, not that he was getting dumped.

    However his blog doesn't say anything about this as far as I saw in my short viewing so I don't even know if the link in the blurb has it right.

  20. Re:Keep Morgan Webb, and we're all set... by cabra771 · · Score: 2, Funny

    *crickets chirping*

    --

    -my other sig is your mom
  21. TechTV + G4... should have happened years ago... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I remember TechTV in its heyday (when I was laid-off in the summer of 2001). Fairly strong programming, very little repetition... and then I went back to work.

    By time I got to watch a decent stretch of TechTV again, it was December of 2001 and the channel was shot. TSS was repeating upwards of four times a day, that Lockergnome freak was destroying Call for Help and the news department seemed to ship everyone off to CNN.

    Fast forward a little bit to 2002/2003 and Comcast now has G4 and Anime Network. TechTV is trying to get into anime (never figured that one out) to reach a "hipper audience." G4, even in its initial prime, was akin to watching a post-2001 TechTV (how many of you have watched our very own Wil Wheaton hosting the same handful of "Arena" episodes for close to a year?!?).

    Now, I'm no fan of Comcast, but this does one thing: solidifies geekdom in one channel.

    Comcast should:

    1) Bring Wil back; 2) Give Leo a big, fat payraise; 3) Create a proper news department; 4) Send all of the anime over to Anime Network;

    And, most importanly:

    5) Get G4/TechTV (GeekTV?) and Anime Network on DirecTV so I CAN WATCH/TiVO THEM, DAMMIT! :D

    In all, this is probably a good thing...

  22. Re:he hosted today? by dubdays · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It will really be a shame when he's no longer hosting TSS. I remember when he and Kate were the hosts, and seriously, it was absolutly the best show on the air. It's sad, but a lot of on-air geeks really lack any real personality whatsoever. Not Leo. He is funny, interesting, insightful (you know, all the +1 words). He's the reason I began watching the show almost 6 years ago, and his leaving is the reason I'll watch it no longer. Besides, everyone else on that show is annoying as hell!

    He is, in reality, why I'm an IT manager today

    We love ya Leo!!!

  23. That's okay by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 4, Funny

    >(Of course, at this point they've only

    >agreed to buy.)


    At this point, I've onlya agreed to watch.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  24. My twisted hate-hate relationship w/ Comcast by dnaboy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I really don't know what to make of this one. In my old place, I had DirecTV, and LOVED it, for several reasons, not the least of which being TechTV. True, it's not the most amazingly technical network in the world, but I really enjoyed shows like FreshGear (where a lot of new toys are previewed, and reviewed), and even the Screen Savers (which delivers computer tips and tricks along with even more web sites to visit in order to make sure my employer gets the least value possible for his employee dollar). Anyway, a year or so ago I moved to a new apartment, facing the wrong direction for my dish. No big deal. I'll just get cable...

    My Bill went from basic programming for about 30something dollars to 70something dollars. Who's my cable company? You guessed it. Comcast.

    I still pay out the cash, though the thing that really irks me is that I don't get the stations I had come to take for granted. TechTV, CNBC world (OK, I'm a dork), and a bunch of other, slightly less important channels.

    I guess I'm glad, as I'll apparently now likely get TechTV back, but I seriously hope this doesn't mean another rate hike (above the 8% from last fall, out of which we got zero new channels, and a new arrangement of channels so that I had to relearn every channel again.

    My Rant is done...I'm going to go watch Dawson's Creek.

  25. Time for the Slashdot Hour by Darth+Cider · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not kissing up here, but TechTV is boring and dumbed down (often infuriatingly so).

  26. Re:Another [probable] blow to objective journalism by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, but TechTV's outgoing owner is Vulcan Ventures, which is a VC firm that's mainly owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen. So, one link to MS out, another in. I don't think this is much of a net change at all from that perspective.

  27. Re:he hosted today? by maxbang · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm with ya, bud. Leo 'n' Kate, then Kate's emigre to that game show (jeez - I can't even remember what it was called before X-play). The current host set is odd, at best. I haven't watched it in over a year because they're just not the same. It was funny as hell when Woz and Mitnick hosted - stuttering, stammering, hamfisting their way through 90 minutes of fun TV time. The most annoying to me is that Kevin Rose dude. While I admire his enthusiasm for, and advocacy of, Linux and open source, he seems to be trying a little hard to be geeky (man, I wish that was true in high school ;) I think he thinks he's 1337 h@x0r or something. One of his "Dark Tips": Kazaa Lite. WTF? I wish I could stick it to the man like that.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  28. Re:Are either any good? by bhtooefr · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't even have cable, and I've seen TechTV a lot (by watching other people's DirectTV).

    It's pretty good. The Screen Savers is a general technology talk show, and Yoshi makes a bunch of sweet cases (especially Mini-ITX). Call for Help is a good guide if you use something other than Windows and you get bombarded by requests to fix computers because "you're smart with computers". X-Play is a decent game review show. Robot Wars can be very fun (robot carnage is awesome - just watch an episode or two). Future Fighting Machines is good if you're a military nut. They've got all sorts of shows on the making of or the meaning of movies and shows - they recently had a big one on LOTR to coincide with the release of ROTK. They also have some other good shows, but most (including Robot Wars and FFM) are simply rebroadcasts of BBC shows.

  29. Eh, I wouldn't watch by qortra · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fact is, computer-based news/facts are so much more easily obtained on the web (with a computer, of all devices). What you're suggesting is like making a radio station dedicated to innovations-in and methods-of television broadcasting.

    I can understand what you're looking for, but television is the wrong medium. Stations like G4/TechTV will always be targeted towards those who plan to make the jump into computers, or who have only been recently indoctrinated into the WWW.

  30. Re:who has TechTV? by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Tech TV covers some interesting things, however, if you are an experienced 'net user you have probably seen everything they cover well in advance of when it actually airs. They even covered gray area things like , DVD copying ,password "recovery", etc., sometimes I just scan it to get a reminder about new gadgets and such . .To summarize sometimes it will bring info to you that you probably would have otherwise thought of, but forget to check on etc. Albeit not the extremely technical stuff.

    It can also be used as a quick reminder of the current HOT tech topics, personally, I forget alot of stuff that I am interested in because there is so much.

  31. TechTV.... by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I remember watching this show in college. Back then they previewed new video cards, talked about software, and played will all sorts of gadgets. They also let people know about new products comming out. So I am suprised the show never took off. I never once was offered Tech TV with my cable deal after leaving the dorms (it has been many years, and I now get 60 channels, twice as many as in college). I know when I was in college, if Tech TV gave a good review for some cool product, someone in the dorm would purhcase it. So they had a great audiance for selling products. I wonder why they failed?

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  32. Re:Are either any good? by pragma_x · · Score: 3, Informative

    My $0.02. TechTV is pretty decent, with "screensavers" possibly being the closest Slashdot will ever get to being on television. You can grab most of the highlights and show abstracts of the website and save yourself some cash. G4 ("the gamer's network" i guess) on the other hand is tolerable in doses, and are obviously still in the progress of building the brand up. They only run during the core hours of the day (infomercials latenights and early mornings), and re-run content in short intervals (less than a week in some cases) with no remorse. To their credit, they're pioneering a tv genre, so I have hopes that it'll get better in a few years. Merging the two seems unlikely, but combined they may wind up with enough quality programming to fill a whole day of scheduling.

  33. Patrick Norton by jrwillis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I hate to see Leo no longer hosting TSS, so long as Patrick Norton is still there we're ok. I think he's one of the only true geeks on TV right now. Rock on Patrick.

    --
    Keep Austin Weird!
  34. Re:Xplay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Adam Sessler is good at what he does. The way Morgan talks it seems like she's not a gamer at heart. Morgan is cute but NOT hot. How she won the PLayboy contest is beyond me.

    Adam is eccentric which fits the part of game reviewer nicely. I prefer watching this much more than watching someone like Kevin Rose acting like he's 1337.

  35. Re:he hosted today? by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While Leo might be interesting for the color he adds to the show, I have to admit that I cringe when he tries to offer help on any really technical problem. Usually he bumbles around a little bit while Patrick looks something up on the web, then Patrick can give the caller some ideas.

    Contrast that with Patrick/Kevin. In this case, Kevin starts out by immediately giving some useful advice, then Patrick chimes in with advice of his own and the websites he just found. All in all, it's better advice to the callers.

    My wife has stopped watching TSS due to Leo. With luck she'll start again. I just hope that they don't bump the 11:00 CST rerun of the show; that is the time slot I always catch.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  36. Now I understand... by Cboyd0319 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Two nights ago, I came home from work to find that my TechTV was no longer included in my programming. I called Comcast to see what was going on and they informed me that the 'Buisness Network' channels were now $5 more a month. This included TechTV, Bloomberg, and a few others. Of course, I told them to go ahead and charge me the $5. I was curious about the sudden billing change, but now I understand. A lot of money was probably spent on this, and I'm sure they wanted to see how many users jumped at the chance to have TechTV back before they annouced the buy.

  37. Re:Leo Laporte by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In general I like Leo (especially as compared to many other TechTV-ers), but you are sooo right about his interrupting. It's like he's so enthusiastic to show off how much he knows that he

    Leo jumps in

    "finishes their sentences for them and follows up with another couple of points that leave the guest just to sit there and give an awkward, 'uh, yeah' while Leo continues on? Yeah, I hate that, too..."

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  38. Re:Leo Laporte by freeze128 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been watching TechTV for about 3 years now, and I can tell you that Leo didn't always interrupt his co-hosts or guests. Only within the last 9-12 months has this started to happen. He used to work VERY well with Patrick Norton.

    There is a local public access technology show in my area, and the host on that show NEVER lets his guests finish their sentences. It must just be something about the business.

  39. Re:he hosted today? by markhb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Shatner, your agent called, something about a margarine commercial.

    --
    Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
  40. Re:Morgan Webb and Laura Swisher need by maxbang · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, yes, and yes! It will be called: Whipped Cream Panties, Linux, and You.

    --
    I also reply below your current threshold.
  41. Re:Another [probable] blow to objective journalism by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Right. With their 7.4% of the company, they control the entire direction of the company.

    Maybe Comcast simply wanted to branch out into more fields, like movie-making and distribution? Getting a piece of the action that the stations themselves pay for the rights to air a given movie or show would be rather nice for the bottom line.

    Or maybe... just maybe... the head of Comcast (whose name eludes me right now and who reportedly runs things pretty much on his own) wants to turn Disney back to what it was. Some people -- even CEOs -- do have fond memories of what Disney was at one time.

    Oh, wait... This is Slashdot. Let me adjust my words for the benefit of the community.

    COMCAST IS IN IT TO RULE THE WORLD! THE HEAD OF COMCAST HAS A COLD LUMP OF LEAD FOR A HEART AND IS INTERESTED ONLY IN THE BOTTOM LINE! HE IS EVIL AND MUST BE STOPPED!!!

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  42. Re:Another [probable] blow to objective journalism by cens0r · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wrong. It was started by Ziff Davis. I actually had DirecTV and watched the launch. It was called ZDTV at the time. It was sold to Paul Allen and renamed TechTV

    --
    Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  43. As long as I can watch "Thunderbirds" by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 2, Funny

    I't "FAB" with me

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  44. DirecTV going to keep it? by EvilStein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Or will Comcast pull it from DirecTV in another lame ploy to get us all to subscribe to lame ass "digital cable?"

    We all know how wonderful Comcast's "customer service" has been...

  45. Re:who has TechTV? by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Informative

    The shows I catch are:

    The Screen Savers - some call in help, but mostly coverage of new computer technologies, product reviews, tips and advice on photoshop, cool tricks (liquid nitrogen ice cream). I have bits of a few of these recorded on the DVR, like the advice on which color printers produce works that don't fade after two years, or the bits on the fastest gaming laptops on the market.

    X Play - Game reviews, done in a pretty good way. If you can catch it, watch the episode (on earlier this week) where they review some of the worst games they've played. (The episode called: "'LifeLine,' Shaquille O'Neal, and Games You Should Never Buy", which will reair this weekend.) I had to watch it twice, because their review of Big Rigs was SOOO funny. I hope they don't touch this show when they merge with the other gaming network.

    Unscrewed - This one is a little stranger. They talk about the dark side of internet culture - discussion of porn sites, hacking tips, guys who speak Klingon, etc. Plus they show random video clips they find on the web. (This is where I first saw the badgerbadgerbadger clip before it was overused.) This content is NOT child safe.

    Anime Unleashed - After midnight central, for an hour, they show dubbed japanese anime. Boogie Pop Phantom, the series they've shown for the last two weeks, is absolutely horrible. The one they showed before that was pretty good, though. It's been a good way to sample anime when I can't get to sleep.

    Unfortunately, X Play is on at the same time as The Daily Show. Usually when John Stewart finishes his monologue and moves to the interview, I switch to TechTV and watch it until 1:00 when I go to bed.

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  46. Re:Leo Laporte by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The better somebody is at being a geek, the worse said person is at appearing on TV. Leo's interruptions are mostly of the nature of keeping the guest on topic and on pace, which is the responsiblity of any TV host. Sometimes, you've just got to cut the guest off because letting them ramble is even worse TV.

  47. Personally... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...I can't stand TechTV. It's the biggest example of "armchair techie" pandering around. You can't watch TechTV and expect to learn anything from it that's of any use unless you're a typical home user or hobbyist. When I first got DirecTV, I was hoping that TechTV would be less consumer oriented and more technology oriented. But most of what they feature on their programming is very boring and old news. Then their non-technology programming blows pretty hard too. I mean, Thunderbirds? Come on! Why not feature good SciFi that is truly "geek worthy". Doctor Who comes to mind. Anyway.. I imagine TechTV will go from worse to hellish. Fortunately I don't watch much TV these days and I NEVER watch TechTV.

  48. Just like "The Site"... by kherr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From the Yahoo article (emphasis added):
    Charles Hirschhorn, founder and CEO of G4, will be the CEO of the combined network. "This merger is a win for G4; a win for TechTV; and a win for our advertising and affiliate partners," said Hirschhorn.
    Seems to have left out mention of the viewers. Guess it's not a win for us. Will it be like MSNBC and "The Site" all over again? Screw the intelligent programming, let's pander to product placement and marketing!
  49. Re:he hosted today? by esswedl · · Score: 3, Funny

    jeez - I can't even remember what it was called before X-play

    Extended Play. I really enjoyed the promo that had Adam Sessler punching and dodging in a side-scroller, the camera pulling back to reveal Kate at the joystick of a cabinet.

  50. Here's a source for hard tech info by Isao · · Score: 3, Informative
    There is such a station. It's called the Research Channel.

    It's available free in the U.S. on Dish Network (channel 9400), many cable networks or direct from Ku-band satellite on Galaxy 10R (11.805GHz, Horizontal, 4580ksym/sec).

    Straight from the lab to your living room.

  51. So that is why my cable bill went up! by krgallagher · · Score: 2, Funny

    You know I don't get it. Here is a company that cann afford to pay cash for Disney, but they cannot get my billing account and my ISP login synchonized so that I do not have to use two different login names and passwords.

    --

    Insert Generic Sig Here:

  52. Re:TechTV is for neophytes (-5 troll) by SydShamino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TechTV has recently covered several issues the night before they are posted to slashdot. (Including the "tech news" part of TSS.)

    If TechTV needs to go, then Slashdot should go too...

    (Besides, we all know that people who follow the advice peddled on Slashdot are equally heading for trouble.)

    --
    It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  53. Re:he hosted today? by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, I guess I forgot to try googling with quotation marks.. archive.org has every episode, in case any other fans of the show are reading this. I have splooged myself.

  54. Re:he hosted today? by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

    Leo is still hosting, he hosted today

    This is his farewell tour as host of TSS. He'll host tonight, and four episodes next week. (Friday has been a scheduded rerun day for a while now.)

    This actually is of Leo's own doing. He actually doesn't want to host TSS anymore, he'd rather be hosting Call For Help. His new work schedule, which starts the week after next, calls for him to only be at the studio two days a week, during which he'll record five episodes of Call For Help and contribute some segments to TSS. On the remaining three weekdays, he'll work from home preparing research for both his TechTV duties and also for his KFI radio show which he does live based out of a barn-turned-radio-studio on his own property.

    So, this really is the end of a overbooked 7-day-workweek schedule he's been on for about the last six months. He's basically going into a semi-retirement, while also assuring that he'll still be employed even if he's no longer with TechTV.

  55. John Dvorak, Silicon Spin by Durandel1020 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to love this show and then it disappeared from the TechTV lineup a few years ago. John would moderate discussion between industry experts on a particular topic. And then he would grill them with his own questions. It was always interesting.

    Id rather see more programming like this on the channel but I think those days are long gone.

    I think TechTV needs more veterens like Dvorak. We know Leo isnt necessarily leaving the lineup, but who knows what in store for us.

    Maybe they will bring some talent on board and make some interesting shows.

  56. Re:he hosted today? by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

    Leo most certainly wanted a reduced broadcast schedule from TechTV. Presently, the man is hosting 10 hours a week of live TV, and then doing 6 hours a week of live radio on his weekends, in addition to his book-writing projects. He needed a break...

  57. Re:THUNDERBIRDS ARE GO! by WTFmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thunder, thunder, thunder THUNDERCA -- oh, sorry.

  58. Re:who has TechTV? by proj_2501 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think ALL of slashdot is the 'short bus' version.

  59. TechTV - one of a kind by mabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As much bashing as TechTV has received here, and I agree that some of their programming, like robot wars, was lame, it still was IMO, the best network of its kind. If Comcast takes it over, it will go downhill fast.

    One thing I really respected was their desire to not edit out their own computer problems. Someone would call in with a Windows question, and their computer would crash on-air -- and they felt it important to let others see that they too, had problems with blue screens of death and things not working properly. You can bet that Paul Allen's crew will edit out these segments so that everyone who watches will see a flawless computer presentation and therefore think the problems they're having are their fault, and not the result of crappy software.

    The TechTV crew are very honest folks that don't bow to the current corporate flavor. I saw them test three brands of wireless push-to-talk devices and they had no reservations about saying which ones sucked and which ones worked. That's refreshing. I guess now we'll see a big string of washed up celebrities going on the show to hawk their latest flop, peppered with more over-hyped software and hardward so that it will be a Tech-ized version of Entertainment Tonite. Oh well. Buh bye TechTV.

  60. techTV should be renamed to abreasTechTV by nxs212 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I haven't watched TechTV for the last two years and was shocked when I saw their new "lineup"!
    Every single show had girls with big breasts that were prominently displayed. Girls with smaller breasts looked like they were stuffing and wearing push-up bras.
    I guess they misunderstood new management's directive to "keep abreast of science and technology"

  61. Re:I liked the "Lockergnome freak"-whatever that i by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2
    No, he wouldn't call another person a Lockergnome - he calls himself Lockergnome.

    Leo started Call for Help years ago, and was the original host, and Chris Pirillo was Leo's hand-picked choice for the show. But Pirillo, the freak of Lockergnomishness I speak of, was utterly annoying on the show. I have only turned off the TV faster for Dubya when Pirillo would come on.

    I'm not asking for a pretty boy, but I am asking for someone who stays within the bounds of the conversation and off of tangents, which Pirillo had problems with.

  62. Re:Leo Laporte by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    YES!!!! Seriously, the guy NEVER let the person he was interviewing finish a thought. Leo always interrupts and gives, usually wrong, commentary on the subject.

    Like this:

    Leo: So John... how did you come up with the idea?

    John: Well, I was going to school at

    Leo: You went to University of hogwash right? What was that like in those days?

    John: I started at UoH for a semester, but graduated from Noplace Technical. Shortly after that I was working for a startup

    Leo: a startup, wow.... you must have been making the big bucks then, what were they doing?

    And it would just go on and on like that.

    It's SOOOOO nice when Patrick gets to do the interviews when Leo is away, the guest actually gets to speak.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  63. Re:Leo Laporte by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Frankly I find all the "hosts" annoying to some degree

    Leo is by far the worst, ignorant, loud and he continually interrupts people smarter than he is.

    Patrick needs to stop saying "well, ya know what...." before or in the middle of every sentence

    Kevin needs to either learn more than on hand gesture, or stop doing it every 15 seconds

    Sarah needs to go away, or at least not be on screen. She's not very knowledgable and she's not very good eye candy, unlike Morgan, Jessica and Erica (or formerly Sumi and Sumi) who are both and then some.

    Yoshi should have his own segment at least a few times a week. The guy has some really neat ideas, but hearing them has always been impossible because he's always on screen with Leo the interruptor. But somebody does need to explain to Yoshi the difference between "mod" and "built from scratch".

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  64. Re:he hosted today? by scupper · · Score: 3, Informative
    Leo's statements in his blog about "prudent to diversify" and this below from the G4 FAQ seem to imply Leo is bracing for the boot. Notice the absence of "Call For Help" from among the shows G4 has listed will be programmed from TechTV, the only show which Leo will be hosting full time w/ TechTV pending the approval of the Comcast Deal.

    G4 FAQ: Programming http://g4tv.com/techtvmerger/
    Q: What will a typical programming day look like?
    A: The merged network will be the nation's premier 24/7 television network all about video games, technology and the gamer lifestyle. The G4 programming day will showcase many existing G4 and TechTV series such as G4's ICONS; PULSE; JUDGMENT DAY; PLAYERS, and CHEAT! as well as TechTV's ANIME UNLEASHED; X-PLAY; SCREEN SAVERS; FRESH GEAR; and ROBOT WARS.G4 will also premiere new original programming which will be announced at a later date.
  65. Business As Usual by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't see anything about viewers. In other words I suspect that your worries will turn out to be founded

    When I was at G4, The Viewers were the last thing on management's mind. There were some executives who actually had a great deal of contempt for "those stupid gamers."

    It's like that in most of television, though. The Viewer is just a potential sale for the advertiser. What The Viewer thinks just isn't important to The Company.

    In this age of mega-mergers and vertically integrated companies who control distribution and content, they don't have to give a flying fuck about The Viewer, so they don't.