Slashdot Mirror


Technology Spontaneously Combusts In Sicily

Zacronos writes "According to MSNBC, ever since mid-January, various electronic devices have been spontaneously combusting in the now evacuated town of Canneto di Caronia, Sicily; at this point, the fires are almost daily. The town has been disconnected from the larger electrical grid and was hooked to a generator, but that, too, caught fire. Even unplugged items have succumbed. Nothing seems to have burst into flame except where there is someone present to witness it, but the police no longer suspect a prankster -- after witnessing wires catch fire without cause. Scientists have yet to explain the phenomenon (although unproven theories abound), leading many people to look to supernatural causes."

192 of 1,010 comments (clear)

  1. Hmm. by messiuh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm thinking, can any kind of EMP cause this?

    1. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You mean if any kind of EMP is the cause of you thinking?

    2. Re:Hmm. by Vihai · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm italian and i followed the story with much interest. Unfortunately news lacked important details about phenomenons, when and how they happened and expecially which of them were true.

      If it was an EMP so strong to burn power lines, why didn't it fry all the small electronics (including scientist's instruments) which are more susceptible to EM fields?

    3. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The common thread in the fires is objects connected to wires, whether powered wires or not. Wires are after all antennas though the matching frequency depends on length. It's well known in RF engineering that under the right circumstances, RF energy can cause high temperatures at impedance boundaries. Quite possibly some high power RF source is causing the phenomena. One of my guesses is energy bouncing off the ionosphere and coming from far away, maybe the US military's HAARP, or something the Russians have. The fact that all the occurrences are in one tiny village midway between some railroad lines and the ocean is odd since nothing industrial or military is nearby. I'd say it's accidental and the result of military testing elsewhere.

    4. Re:Hmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Doesn't need to be EMP. A continous Tesla-style resonant earth antenna can create "hot zones" where ground... isn't...

    5. Re:Hmm. by fshalor · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think they were testing BPL in this region....Natural resonances of power systems are a phenomena which is very little known in this sort of region.

      Another big hint: they said the'd disconnected the town from the power system. If they still had a connection somewhere to the grid that they didn't know about, that would set them up for more problems. (Mixing grounds from different phases is a NONO... I've experienced really bad RF just trying to use a radio that was running on gen power and a computer on shore at the same time.)

      --
      -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
    6. Re:Hmm. by sploxx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      According to the article:
      > [...] while a van with a large, rotating antennas on top measures the radio waves.

      It seems that they look for that particular cause.

    7. Re:Hmm. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would suggest they start with several teams with fied strength meters looking for the guy doing Tesla tests...

      my EE professor back in college demonstrated Nicolai Tesla's theories and designs by powering a electronic device from across the room and with no wires. he also warned all of us to NOT bring any electronic equipment and everyone in the Engineering building was also warned as well were PC's removed from the building.

      he was generating a field strength that pegged a standard meter 500 feet from the building.

      Tesla was going to generate much HIGHER atmosphereic voltages with his tower...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:Hmm. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ultra low frequency EM radiation can have effects on objects that are normally insulators. This phenomina can be abserved during meteor storms. Most notably, with some shooting stars, you can "hear" them despite them being several miles above you effectively instantainiously. It is hypothisized that as the meteor disintigrates during entry, the resulting plasma stores the magnetic field lines of the planted. The plasma moves somewhat before it cools. As it cools the field lines snap back into place creating a low frequency EM-pulse that causes leaves and assorted other things on the ground to oscilate breifly.

      However, I have never heard of it producing current high enough to set anything on fire. Oh, and anyway, furnature usually has metal nails, screws, and staples in it.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    9. Re:Hmm. by paganizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought this was a nerd site!
      It's obvious what this is; the barrier between the normal world and faerie is coming down; look for reports of weird creatures in the nearby hills, similar things happening in various spots around the world as the local rules of physics change.
      It's FULLY detailed in the Shadowrun or Dark Conspiracy sourcebooks.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    10. Re:Hmm. by Klatma · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought the same thing, "Damn, a week late."

      Until I went to CNN.com and did a search on the village and found similar articles from February and March. Plus articles from many different sources.

    11. Re:Hmm. by DonGar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps the Seti project should start listening in the area. I'm not 100% joking, because they have a LOT of experience at identifying (and discounting) man made radio sources.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    12. Re:Hmm. by CrazyDuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was wondering the same thing. There is actually a story on this on CNN today. I'd submit it if the editors didn't seem hell bent on rejecting everything I try to submit.

      Story here.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    13. Re:Hmm. by hoyty · · Score: 2, Informative

      There actually is US military close by. There is a navy base in Sigonella which is an airfield as well as stopping point in the Italian docks nearby for some ships.

      --
      Hoyty
    14. Re:Hmm. by elliotCarte · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, I thought it was a nerd site too. Too bad the people investigating this aren't nerds or they would've figured it out by now. Consider this quote from the article: "We're working in the dark. We don't have a single lead so far," You dumn shit. If you're working in the dark you need a LED not a LEAD. Sheesh.

      --
      If you can't just be yourself, then be more like me, ok?
    15. Re:Hmm. by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If this was the military testing something, even if it was accidental, if they could target this it could be one hell of an effective weapon if developed further. Imagine targeting another country somewhere in the world, and making it so their electrical devices randomly combust. Powerful indeed.

      Now where can I buy this device?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    16. Re:Hmm. by TheIzzy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's obvious the town has been slashdoted.

    17. Re:Hmm. by mdinowitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm rather interested in this as well. I've had simular experiences in homes that I lived in. Radios would go on and off, clocks (battery, plug, etc.) would go back and forward. No fires, but some strange effects. While I personally believe in magick (goes along with being an orthodox Jew), I'd like to see a technical reason for it if one exists. I'll be watching this story closely and contacting fellow programmers in Italy.

      --
      Michael Dinowitz House of Fusion http://www.houseoffusion.com
  2. Virgin Mary by UID1000000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many many people will soon flock to Sicily to see the virgin Mary.

    Sadly, in the news, a number of faithful Catholics have suddenly burst into flames today.

    --
    UID 1000000 is just around the corner.

    1. Re:Virgin Mary by xSauronx · · Score: 4, Funny

      sudden my ass, it took 3 hours to set that up!

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    2. Re:Virgin Mary by gerddie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sadly, in the news, a number of faithful Catholics have suddenly burst into flames today.
      Obviously, they where heretics ...

  3. Crazy theory? by dncsky1530 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I knew Windows Longhorne wasn't ready to be released

  4. Bah... by odano · · Score: 2, Funny

    It looks to me like the whole thing was just invented. I'll bet if I visited, I could find the problem in two minutes... tops.

  5. Confirmation? by CdBee · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can any Sicilian slashdotter confirm this seemingly unlikely story?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    1. Re:Confirmation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bah - I'm from Sicily and this story is a complete load of **BZZZZZZZZTT*

      NO CARRIER

    2. Re:Confirmation? by mirko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope : They won't switch their computer on to discuss about this since it might catch fire :)

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    3. Re:Confirmation? by CdBee · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    4. Re:Confirmation? by chendo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a Sicilian slashdotter and I haven't seen it ye- (#*@$#)@(&)DF%N CARRIER LOST

      --
      Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
    5. Re:Confirmation? by CdBee · · Score: 5, Funny

      OK, Can any sicilian slashdotter with a carrier pigeon or a battery powered CB radio confirm this?

      --
      I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
    6. Re:Confirmation? by DavidNWelton · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has been in the news here in Italy on and off for a couple of months. I'd still want to see it with my own eyes though...

    7. Re:Confirmation? by Malc · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have an unladen European Swallow...

    8. Re:Confirmation? by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 4, Funny

      Finally a practical use for IP over avian carriers! :)

    9. Re:Confirmation? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not bad, Packet data, AND a decent meal.

      Flame grilled pigeon tastes quite nice :D

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    10. Re:Confirmation? by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      ::Smiles at the idea of a carrier pigeon bursting into flame as soon as a message is attatched to its leg because it now falls under the 'technology' category::


      -Colin

    11. Re:Confirmation? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's similar to power over Ethernet, isn't it? Your energy comes with your data?

    12. Re:Confirmation? by Goedel74 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a Sicilian (I live in Catania) and I can confirm that the news is real. At first the police thought of fraudulent actions from unknown people but after some weeks 3-4 policemans saw some electric cables (old cables, unconnected and resting on floor) that started spontaneously to combust. After that many scientists and technicians have done many tests without results. Those events are happening only in a very little town near the city of Messina.

    13. Re:Confirmation? by dogdaze · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wondered why I had this firewire jack on my puter.

    14. Re:Confirmation? by ErroneousBee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really, how fast does it go?

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    15. Re:Confirmation? by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's what you get for participating in flame-wars...

      --
      This comment does not exist.
    16. Re:Confirmation? by ckaminski · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, great. Thanks. Leave my sockets in a TIME-WAIT state, thanks... You do know you're supposed to *ACK* that packet, right?

    17. Re:Confirmation? by happyfrogcow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Watch our for their dropped packets!

      splat.

    18. Re:Confirmation? by autocracy · · Score: 5, Funny
      (#*@$#)@(&)DF%N
      I just wanted to note that your code doesn't seem to execute in my version of perl. Which version did you write that in? *smirk*
      --
      SIG: HUP
    19. Re:Confirmation? by Carl+Sable · · Score: 5, Funny

      Knight 1: Maybe he spontaneously combusted before he could finish?

      Knight 2: He wouldn't say **BZZZZZZZZTT*, he'd just say it!

      Knight 1: Maybe he was dictating.

  6. well... by snub · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously, if they were running Linux this wouldn't be happening now would it?

    --
    "Shredded cabbage and mayo go good together." Cole's Law
    1. Re:well... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 5, Funny

      See what happens when you don't pay your $699?

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:well... by phaxkolumbo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well mine said a while ago:

      kernel: lp0 on fire

      Are you sure that Linux is really safe? I'm scared.

  7. Best quote: "We're working in the dark..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article: "We're working in the dark. We don't have a single lead so far," said Pedro Spinnato, mayor of the trio of Caronia towns.

  8. I don't meant to be blasphemous, but... by Vandil+X · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Jesus!"

    I feel sorry for any IT professionals walking around with a pager, NEXtel, and a PDA in their pockets/belts. Ouch!

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:I don't meant to be blasphemous, but... by 3dr · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you mean the eJesus?

  9. The Slashdot Effect by richie2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In unrelated news, media reports that many websites carrying "news for nerds, stuff that matters" spontaneously combust, especially when lots of people are witnessing it. Apparently, a Sicilian hosting company has been hit particularly hard.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. Heh. .. by messiuh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like siciliy finally got the boot!

    *badum ching!*

  12. No way! by Walkiry · · Score: 4, Funny

    It was posted today! The fact that this news piece appears backdated in other websites proves there is something supernatural involved!!

    *Jumps into Holy Water pool*

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  13. Volcano Experts? by imag0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Colored markings on the street indicate the presence of volcano experts...

    Sweet jumpin' Jesus! The volcano 'experts' must have burned up and left little *poof* marks where they stood.

    1. Re:Volcano Experts? by seanmeister · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best. Volcano expert joke. Ever. :)

    2. Re:Volcano Experts? by sunbeam60 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only. Volcano expert joke. Ever.

  14. The Score by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Scientists have yet to explain the phenomenon ... leading many people to look to supernatural causes

    It really makes me sad when, if people don't understand something they assume it's magic. Why is it that so many people refuse to take 'we don't know yet' as an acceptable answer?

    Science: 0
    Magic: 1

    :/


    -Colin

    1. Re:The Score by slackerboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."--Arthur C. Clarke

      --
      Things to do today: See list of things to do yesterday
    2. Re:The Score by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What is magic, if not simply something we do not (yet) understand?

      Finkployd

    3. Re:The Score by madprof · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Magic is a trick. This is the point. Magicians call themselves 'illusionists' - they can (very cleverly) fool you into believing all sorts of things.
      David Copperfield did not make the Statue of Liberty disappear but created the illusion that it had done so.

    4. Re:The Score by Hast · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It may be "magical" but it isn't "supernatural" or "paranormal". That is, just because you don't understand something should your first assumption be that "this can only be explained by rejecting all previous knowledge and making something up".

      And I find the lack of citations from any of the alleged scientist disturbing. The press is in a sad state indeed.

    5. Re:The Score by fishbot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo."--Anon.

    6. Re:The Score by TMB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Corollary: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is not sufficiently advanced." ;-)

      [TMB]

    7. Re:The Score by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Magic is, by definition, what we don't understand.

      That is such crap. I don't understand how international currency exchange rates work, but I don't say 'must be magic!'. Scientists don't know why the magnetic poles of the Earth reverse, but I doubt that any of them would suggest the reason is Magic until they learn something new.


      -Colin

    8. Re:The Score by jamesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can do that.
      Fires are appearing randomly, what are the possible causes:
      1. fire bugs
      2. higher than normal voltage
      3. emp devices being tested nearby
      4. act of God 1 (natural causes)
      5. act of God 2 (God's pissed - it is Easter, afterall)
      6. aliens

      we can rule out #1 due to witnesses. Ditto for #2 as fires have been happening in unplugged equipment.

      We can also rule out #3 as the slashdot crowd says that can't be it.

      There is nothing in nature that we know of that would cause #4. God promised after Noah's flood he wouldn't do this sort of thing again so we can rule out #5.

      That just leaves #6. :p

    9. Re:The Score by cabraverde · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."--Arthur C. Clarke

      It really makes me sad when, if people don't understand something they assume it's advanced technology.

    10. Re:The Score by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Who wants to be cited as the scientist who couldn't solve the mystery?

      It reminds me of a biblical story where the king killed all his advisors who couldn't tell him what his dream meant.

    11. Re:The Score by Hell+O'World · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from terrorism."--Not Arthur C. Clarke

    12. Re:The Score by theLOUDroom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is magic, if not simply something we do not (yet) understand?

      An excuse for not understanding something.

      Rather than being bothered to actually try and understand something you just shrug your shoulders and say "magic".

      It all reminds me of one of my favorite Calvin and Hobbes strips:
      Calvin: Dad, what makes the wind? Dad: Trees sneezing. Calvin: Really? Dad: No, but the real answer is a lot more complex.

      Magic/Myth/Religion are all ways to explain the world to those who can't bother to be interested in the actual truth.

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    13. Re:The Score by aliens · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sure, blame me!

      For the last time, it's the Illuminati!

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    14. Re:The Score by sjames · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a few reasons. Firstly, there people are sitting in a hotel and tired of it, hoping daily that this isn't the day their family home (or entire town) burns to the ground. They're desperate for an answer and not in the mood to spend a few years investigating this interesting phenomenon.

      Next there's the fact that to most people, technology itself IS a sort of magic. Just press that button and invisible forces spring into being to make the cup of water boil. Even if they take the nuker apart it still looks like magic. Just one moving part, and even that doesn't have to be there (but the heating will be less even without it).

      If you look at the way many people without technical knowledge interact with technology, it's just a bunch of 'invocations' that they have learned will do something useful (usually they learned it from a book of a techie). For all the meaning it has to them, they might as well be burning incense and shouting arcane latin phrases. They know that when the incantations don't work, there's this 'reboot' that can restore order. That's why you see business DSL customers rebooting the router when the email doesn't work (but the web does) and rebooting their PC didn't fix it.

      Sometimes, when there's no harm in it, I find it better to let people do those things while I figure out what the problem is. It lets them feel less helpless and occasionally, they stumble over the solution.

      You'll also note that the local priest along with the residents did decide to let the scientists have the first crack at the problem.

      'We don't know yet' is a perfectly valid answer right now, but it doesn't get them back into their homes. It doesn't help that things bursting into flames for no discernable reason is a recurring theme in movies about the supernatural.

      It doesn't help that scientists aren't always all that scientific when presented with observations thay cannot explain. Too often, important phrases like "this is just a guess, but" get replaced with "I'm absolutely certain that" whenever coincidence is about to be invoked. The correct pronouncement would be "I have no idea whatsoever", but scientists don't like to say that either.

      Add on top of that all of the 'scientific' pronouncements like 'eggs are bad for you', 'any wine is bad for you', 'oops, no, some wine is good for you, and so are eggs, but avoid fat at all costs', 'oops, people are getting fatter on low fat diets', etc, etc, and people start to think that the 'scientists' are just making things up too. They make the mistake of confusing various pseudoscientific nonsense from the FDA, NIH, and the AMA (or their own regional equivilants) for science. I call it pseudoscience because collectively they have a habit of stating working theory (complete with conflicting evidence) as if it were fact and flatly denying the existance of plainly observable phenomena when the correct answer is clearly "We don't know".

      If we can't get scientists to abandon dogma and various forms of mysticism, how can we expect it from laymen?

    15. Re:The Score by macdaddy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Really though it was nothing to do with "magic" but instead it has everthing to do with that person's religious beliefs and whatever supreme deity that person happens to subscribe. Anything that challenges that person's beliefs must be the devil. Think about the Salem Massacre. They thought that women were witches not because they concocted evil brews in big pots in their kitchens. They took the smallest unusual point about each of those women and used it to say they were witches simply because they felt their religion was being challenged. Those women, those "witches" were probably prostitutes. Or perhaps they simply didn't attend church. Maybe they were of another belief and were waiting for a church of that belief to be built in the area. Who knows. It didn't fit in with the views of the bigots in Salem though so those women were tortured and burden at the stakes as witches. Calling them heretics or infidels would be confessing that really you just don't agree with their religious views, hence the use of witches. Intolerance is mans' oldest flaw.

      "Oh it must be a sign from Allah, Sedna, or the Great Spirit! They put it there for me to see. It must be a sign. They are commanding me to Kill Bill!"

    16. Re:The Score by deglr6328 · · Score: 2, Informative

      "It doesn't help that scientists aren't always all that scientific when presented with observations thay cannot explain. Too often, important phrases like "this is just a guess, but" get replaced with "I'm absolutely certain that" whenever coincidence is about to be invoked. The correct pronouncement would be "I have no idea whatsoever", but scientists don't like to say that either."

      This is absolutely not true and it seems like you've just made it up to suit your argument that scientists are 'mystical' and dogmatic.
      I work around scientists all the time and I hear the phrase "I don't know" ALL THE TIME. Scientists as a whole have no problem admitting they do not fully understand a phenomenon, partly because the activity of scientufic inquiry is itself a humbling one.

      "Add on top of that all of the 'scientific' pronouncements like 'eggs are bad for you', 'any wine is bad for you', 'oops, no, some wine is good for you, and so are eggs, but avoid fat at all costs', 'oops, people are getting fatter on low fat diets',....."

      One caveat, dieticians are NOT scientists!

      "I call it pseudoscience because collectively they have a habit of stating working theory (complete with conflicting evidence) as if it were fact and flatly denying the existance of plainly observable phenomena when the correct answer is clearly "We don't know"."

      This is total strawman cunstructing nonsense. Please cite one instance where this has occured among experts in the hard sciences.

      Scientists are the most non-superstitious and non-dogmatic group of people in society.

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    17. Re:The Score by Illuminati+Legal+Tea · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is the last time you slander us Mr. aliens. We will now take you to court.

      We will also take Slashdot to court for chopping off the m at the end of our name.

    18. Re:The Score by GileadGreene · · Score: 4, Insightful
      There's lots of stuff science can't explain.

      It would perhaps be more correct to say that "There's lots of stuff that science hasn't yet explained". The term science doesn't refer to some fixed body of knowledge. It refers to a methodology for finding and refining explanations.

    19. Re:The Score by The-Dalai-LLama · · Score: 5, Funny

      At this point in the discussion I doubt this will be read by anyone, but I'm going to tell the story anyway.

      At the tail end of a stint in the Marines (too short to deploy) I got shipped to a headquarters unit personnel office that had a bunch of computers networked to a couple of shared printers. Since I knew the most about computers (which isn't saying much) people often asked me to help them with small problems.

      One of the corporals came to me once and said that her computer wouldn't print. I walked over, fiddled with everything I knew to fiddle with, and when that didn't help I turned to religion.

      "Corporal," I said, "Papa Legba is the voodoo god of the crossroads; all communication falls into his domain and he is displeased. We must make a sacrifice. Do you have a floppy disk that you are not using?" She gave me a 3.5" disk, which I held in the air and then tore open. I used a ballpoint pen to mark some arcane-looking but utterly meaningless symbols on the disk's medium, then had her tape it to the side of her monitor. I told her to try it again.

      Of course, when she tried again it printed with no problem. I have no idea what changed, but as I walked back to my desk she told me that I was the weirdest man she had ever met.

      The "sacrifice" was still taped to the monitor when I rotated out three months later.

      The Dalai Llama
      ...probably reading "Count Zero" at the time...

    20. Re:The Score by sjames · · Score: 2, Funny

      :-)

      I sometimes think that digital devices are a lot less deterministic than we think they are.

      I once had a machine come back to me for repairs several times a week. I could never find a problem with it. I had the user go through whatever caused the problem while I watched quietly, and it would never fail.

      In desperation and attempting to put some humor in the situation, I dropped a single hair on the MB and closed it back up.

      No more problems. :-)

      I'll have to remember your solution. Great potential there to start some really funny office gossip!

    21. Re:The Score by cwg_at_opc · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'll vote for the aliens too; i was thinking that was why people keep up and disappearing, then finding themselves away from home, dehydrated and disoriented. the aliens are trying out some new tests on us that aren't working so well. in this case, one of the aliens left something on that wasn't supposed to be on:

      alien 1: did you remember to shut off the gamma regulator on the...
      alien 2: uhh...well, i uhh...
      alien 1: now we have to go back and turn it off! that'll put about another 30,000 light years on this boat. when they check the odometer at the rental place, we'll have to pay an over light-year-mileage charge!

      a co-worker used to say that LAX was a giant battery that took the energy generated by all the people going in and out of the airport and stored it underneath in what looked like a huge capacitor( i was shown a map of LAX.) he also said the earthquakes around here were caused by the aliens blasting a deep underground tunnel from LAX to someplace in nevada(like area 51). they could just buy the chunnel borer now that it's on sale.

      i love how this thread went from scientific hypothesis to linux lp0 on fire, to god, to magic, to tesla, to volcanic activity. the only thing i haven't seen yet is the de rigeur, "...in soviet russia..." joke!

      --
      "...that's as white as it gets; all the bits are on..."
    22. Re:The Score by GileadGreene · · Score: 3, Informative
      Do you actually believe that this "methodology" is capable of producing an all-encompassing theory of everything?

      Sure. Why not? The basic algorithm is:

      1. Observe something no previously predicted or explained
      2. Develop a hypothesis to explain the observations
      3. Make predictions based on the hypothesis
      4. Develop tests to determine whether the hypothesis is correct or incorrect
      5. If the hypothesis is incorrect revise it based on the new observations
      6. Rinse and repeat
      Please tell me how this algorithm, given enough time, will not succeed in explaining "everything"?

      Forgive me if that sounds a little arrogant.

      You are forgiven.

      Also, what is it that is being explained? Reality, or our perception of reality?

      What is reality but what you perceive? If something is completely imperceptible (i.e. makes no observable change in the universe whatsoever) then whether it exists or not is irrelevant - it makes no difference to my life or yours. If it can be perceived, it can be observed. If it can be observed it is amenable to study via the scientific method.

    23. Re:The Score by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please tell me how this algorithm, given enough time, will not succeed in explaining "everything"?

      There's a Frederik Pohl novella called "Iron," written in the Known Space universe during the Man-Kzin wars (it's in the series - maybe 4 or 5?) which does exactly this. There's a chunk of the novella during which the protagonist stumbles on the remnants of an unfortunate civilization, born on a planet without surface metals of any sort. Pohl makes the case that as a result they were hard-limited; there was simply a point beyond which they didn't have the tools to progress.

      Whereas I'm not sure a simple lack of metals is enough to do this, consider a more extreme case if you will. Posit a human civilization on the inside of an artificial glass sphere, provided food through a mysterious (technological) doorway. Presume that they have some material which is electrostatically rigid, and that they're careful enough not to let any human vermin up the feeding tube, and wham, there's your example. If you inject a bunch of savages - say, they're five when you put them in there, and they lose language skills over a few generations, or maybe they're seventeen and already lost them - and give them nothing more complex than a whole bunch of peat moss and some trees and whatever, then they're not going to get a whole lot further than the ancient world. Sure, maybe they'll cook up an Archimedes and get down to calculus. They're not getting electrifaction, they're not getting heavy computing machines, they're not really beating the abacus.

      This isn't as mentally masterbatory as it sounds. Who are we to say that we've got all the tools we need to progress? If we had no metals, wouldn't it seem absurd that lightning could move *through* materials, not just be insulated by them, like pretty much all biological materials in the human common experience do?

      Science Fiction provides dozens of examples for this, so of course, I'm falling back on Star Trek. Consider that a number of its technologies weren't "possible" until the discovery of new materials, probably the easiest example of which is the second (and later) phase of the periodic table, on which you find dilithium, trilithium, and so on. Finding another such example is really just a question of knowing sci-fi well.

      Thing is, there are lots of good real world examples, too. We're not even really sure how many dimensions there are right now, or what their natures are, how many of them we exist in (time, spin, charge potential, etc,) and so on. There are good arguments for the numbers 10 and 14, judging by the way they simplify certain deep equations, but that might just reflect that because we have no access to dimension 15 we're missing a situation that makes those laws oversimple. I mean, hell, we didn't realize there might be more than four until the 1950s; who's to say we haven't missed others?

      What is reality but what you perceive? If something is completely imperceptible (i.e. makes no observable change in the universe whatsoever) then whether it exists or not is irrelevant - it makes no difference to my life or yours. If it can be perceived, it can be observed. If it can be observed it is amenable to study via the scientific method.

      Nah. Just because something cannot be percieved doesn't mean it's outside our existence entirely. All that means is that we don't yet have the tools or wisdom to identify it. The Sahara aquifer made no observable change in the medeival universem but whether it existed was quite relevant; it caused one of the earth's largest deserts (shut up, antarctica is a desert and it's bigger,) it made an impassable military terrain, it prevented a particular direction of human expansion, et cetera.

      "But clearly it was percieved in that the desert was known to be growing!" you cry, or maybe "but that's just because we were primitive, I'm talking about people with future science" or perhaps "the faulty beliefs of the day hindered correct observations." Yes, those are thr

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  15. Human nature by DrXym · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It will be fun watching people make asses out of themselves over this.


    You only have to look at all the loony beliefs in the world to know that people will leap to the most ridiculous conclusions at the drop of a hat.


    "We can identify that flying object so therefore it must be an advanced alien scout ship!" etc.


    It's sad really. No doubt when the mundane reason for this story becomes clear (e.g. hoax, sensational reporting or whatever), there will be another bunch of loons accusing the Italian government of a 'coverup'.

  16. Re:Article one week old by Mostly+a+lurker · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, it is not an April Fools joke. For details, see http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/canneto.htm that has been covering events for 5 weeks already.

  17. Radar Installation Nearby by N8F8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do there happen to be any radar installations nearby?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  18. THE ALIENS ARE COMING :D by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who is to say that they aren't?

    I mean, aliens don't have to be our size, they could be tiny little critters that can't be seen with the naked eye.
    This could just be a series of tiny little BBQ's gone wrong?

    If I was an alien, Sicily would seem like a nice place to go :)

    --
    This is the sig that says NI (again)
  19. This will happen in the US soon too... by syntap · · Score: 4, Funny

    if the RIAA and Microsoft get all of their DRM technology in order.

    Wow, the new Janet Jackson single... gimmee gimmee gimmee playing WOOOOOOOOOF! FLAMES!

  20. There's something weird in the neighborhood, by Stu+Catz · · Score: 2, Funny

    who you gonna call? GHOSTBUSTERS! heh, i had to do it.

  21. Limits of Science by Fortress · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find this a good example of those phenomena that science can't yet explain. I'm often amused by science types that say something is impossible because it doesn't fit any current theory.

    Seems to me any true scientist should always be watching for observations that don't fit the known theory, as they are indicators of a nedd for further refinement.

    Sadly, scientists, like most people, are more interested in being right, and tend to look for confirming evidence, sometimes to the detriment of their conclusions.

    Before you flame me as an anti-science zealot, let me confess that I'm a science guy as much as your average geek, and I think science is responsible for most of the good changes of the last few centuries. I just think that when we hold too tight to our theories, we leave the realm of skeptical science and enter the world of blind faith.

    BTW, I have no plausible explanation for the spontaneous fires. But I am confident that someone will come up wih one that doesn't invole a tinfoil hat.

    1. Re:Limits of Science by Oligonicella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "science types that say something is impossible because it doesn't fit any current theory"

      They don't. Not the *real* ones anyway, only the quacks with books to sell. Science is all about finding evidence to *refute*, not support, a hypothesis.

      You need to read more.

    2. Re:Limits of Science by papik · · Score: 2, Informative
      Seems to me any true scientist should always be watching for observations that don't fit the known theory, as they are indicators of a nedd for further refinement.

      Sadly, scientists, like most people, are more interested in being right, and tend to look for confirming evidence, sometimes to the detriment of their conclusions.

      It seems to me that you are confused about science. It works exactly like you say. Some scientist looks for observation that don't fit the theory, refine it or make up another, then try an experiment to confirm the new theory.

      It can happen that some scientist is so convinced of his theory to reject evidence, but that it's how the world works. I could say that IT people should make life easier, not create some obscure software that crashes, get virus, delete data at random, etc. and then they blame the user.

    3. Re:Limits of Science by Hast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually I would say that it's a good example of media presenting it as something science can't explain. If you read the article you may note that they have no citations from any of the billion of scientist who are apparently there. They do provide a lot of quotes from people who think it's related to electrical appliances possessed by the devil.

      For a more scientific approach to the problem you should check the site The Fires of Canneto di Caronia which at least attempt to provide an explaination.

      And furthermore, you may complain that scientist are sceptical to new ideas. This is natural because in science there is a clear distintion between an idea (hypothesis) and something which is "tried and true" (theory, law). What these enthusiasts are doing is to invent meaningless stuff about the "causes" and claiming that it's as good as a scientific idea. Now naturally if you can't use the hypothesis to actually predict anything then it's at best cute. Most likely it's a big fat waste of time.

      The scientific method is a systematic way of getting more and better knowledge. What these people do is a good way to sell more papers. I just feel that it's so extremely sad when I read about "science" or statistics in a paper that I want to go to that journal and smack him on the nose with a rolled up paper (perhaps a scientific journal would help) and say "Bad irresponsible crackpot journalist! Bad irresponsible crackpot journalist! Look at what you did!"

      BTW I recommend that you read eg "The deamon haunted world" by Carl Sagan. It's a pretty good introduction to critical thinking in a world of disinformation.

    4. Re:Limits of Science by Chainsaw+Messiah · · Score: 2, Funny
      But I am confident that someone will come up wih one that doesn't invole a tinfoil hat.

      Swamp Gas?

    5. Re:Limits of Science by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Science is all about finding evidence to *refute*, not support, a hypothesis.

      On the contrary, Popper's ideas about the nature of scientific inquiry have been proven incorrect for the simple reason that hypotheses are not tested in vacuums. If you disprove a conjunction, you only know that one of the components is false, but you don't know which one. In reality, science works both ways: finding evidence both for and against certain hypotheses and most importantly, independently validating them.

      You need to read more.

      I'd suggest you (re-)read Kuhn.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    6. Re:Limits of Science by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm often amused by science types that say something is impossible because it doesn't fit any current theory

      They don't. Not the *real* ones anyway, only the quacks with books to sell.

      I think the parent poster was referring to people who could safely be called "science fanboys". If something doesn't fit their brand of scientific dogma, then it's obviously nonsense. They start from the conclusion they want (which was told to them by someone else - i.e., not original) and dismiss or ridicule what doesn't support it.

      Of course, these people aren't "scientists", they're "science types". (Well, some real scientists might be like that - who am I to say that all scientists are good scientists.

  22. Perhaps volcanic activity is the cause? by Phoenix-kun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is an interesting and recent article that has some further details on the subject.

    --
    Phoenix
  23. Aurora Borealis? by re-Verse · · Score: 4, Funny

    And strangely fitting:

    " "....My God! Is that your kitchen on fire?"
    "Err, no. It's Aurora Borealus."
    "An Aurora Borealus?"
    "Yes."
    "At this time of the day, at this time of year, in this part of the country, localized entirely in your kitchen?!"
    ".....Yes."
    "....Can I see it?"
    ".....No."

  24. You need protection in Sicily... by aapold · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or sometimes things just.... catch fire..... we wouldn't want that now would we?

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  25. Yay! by Zebedeu · · Score: 4, Funny
    Spinnato, the mayor, sounds just as desperate.

    "Someone wrote to us saying the solution was to sacrifice a black goat and collect its blood. At some point, that's going to start looking like a good idea."

    Wohoo! They took my advice!

  26. Not Unique by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Believe or not, similar incidents have occurred before.

    o 1945 - A village a short distance from Almera in Spain (New York Time 5th July 1945).

    o 1983 - A small coal town in West Virginia, Wharncliffe (Housten Post 16th June 1983 and Columbus Dispatch 24th July 1983)

    o 1990 - San Gottardo in the Berici Hills of Italy
    (UK Sunday Express 11th March 1990 and The Guardian 22nd March 1990)

    I've given you references so you can check them out for yourself.

    (posted anonymously to avoid Slashdotters you refuse to think about things which don't fit inside their predefined universe).

    1. Re:Not Unique by madprof · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please do provide references! Scepticism is a natural and healthy thing.

    2. Re:Not Unique by TwistedGreen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      posted anonymously to avoid Slashdotters you refuse to think about things which don't fit inside their predefined universe

      Don't be ridiculous. Do you seriously think there are Slashdotters who don't enjoy a tantalizing problem like this one?

    3. Re:Not Unique by scrytch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > (posted anonymously to avoid Slashdotters you refuse to think about things which don't fit inside their predefined universe).

      My predefined universe requires things like proof. Shall I post a list of recent Elvis sightings?

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
  27. Mod Parent Up by Fortress · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is possibly the funniest exchange ever between Principal Skinner and Superintendant Chalmers.

    re-Verse, you steam a fine ham.

  28. all this is measureable by VTdude · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. The anchient art of measuring EMI is not exactly lost. Italy is covered with individuals from test labs to HAM radio operators who can take a few spectrum analyzers with antennas and powerline couplers and measure EMI an conducted emissions and look for these surges.

    2. America is one of the few nations in the world where the power going out or setting firest makes the news, in most of the world it happens daily.

    3. About a decade ago Italy ruled their version of the FCC incompetent and disbanded them. Though there are EU rules to deal with, it is a wild west of wireless where you can send photon-torpedo strength EMI around with no-one to slap you until the mobs find you.

  29. Obviously by eclectro · · Score: 2, Funny


    It's the result of scientists ignoring Zero Point Energy for so long. Now it is rearing it's ugly head.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  30. Or blame the military, CIA, Illuminati... by October_30th · · Score: 4, Insightful
    if people don't understand something they assume it's magic.

    Or some evil, sinister military/CIA project. Do a quick Google seach on HAARP and/or weather control and you'll see.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Or blame the military, CIA, Illuminati... by Prowl · · Score: 3, Interesting

      methinks someone's playing with tesla coils. what happens when the earth voltage goes sky high?? stuff catches fire presumably...

      (at least thats what happened at tunguska...)

      --
      That man tried to kill mah Daddy
  31. Revenge by ChronoWiz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Witness the vengance of the Amish for their many years of ridicule at our hands!

    My electronics burning up may as well be the apocalypse...

  32. I'd mod you insightful... by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But I spent all my mod points. Of course, it could easily have a natural cause instead of a military one - stranger things have happened, and we have such a complex system here that even staggeringly high amounts of sporadic interference can almost disappear in the noise.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    1. Re:I'd mod you insightful... by kgarcia · · Score: 5, Funny

      Bah

      It's that giant subwoofer the one guy built...

  33. Re:Slash and burn by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Don't laugh. I've seen it done.

    A company (I don't remember what) was trying to sell some of a wetting agent to a fire department I was part of. They demonstrated that it got soot stains out of concrete, got oil off your hands, etc.

    They mixed the stuff about at about a 1:5 ration with gasoline, and used a bucket to splash the resulting mixture onto a pile of burning tires. It darned near put it out. It did reduce the temperature of the fire by 2500 degrees Farenhuit.

  34. It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It really makes me sad when, if people don't understand something they assume it's magic.

    They don't. They usually assume it's god. Especially in Italy, I guarantee you the first "expert" called in was the local priest, not the local college professor. I guarantee you people have spent more time praying to god than going about finding a scientific explanation or identifying what's unique. Furthermore, the assumption of "no foul play because it happened right in front of us" is absurd- there are numerous chemicals, for example, that can be applied wet, and when they dry and crystalize, become super-sensitive to contact. Of course, they're a bitch to handle, so it's a little far-fetched...

    Religion has always given the weak-minded something to pacify their consciences. Why do you think some of the most religious people are often absolute morons, and many intelligent, well-educated people often aren't highly religious? Idiots need an explanation for everything, intelligent people seek answers and do not believe in what they cannot prove to themselves.

    Religion:

    • Provides a handy universal explanation for just about anything. Which cannot be proved.
    • Controls the population by threatening them with eternal consequences. Which cannot be proved. Ie, you're going to hell. Or you'll be reincarnated as a rock.
    • Pacifies the population by giving them the hope that, no matter what shithole they're living in now, all they have to do is Be Good and they'll end up in a better place. The existence of which cannot be proved.
    • Is specifically structured to ensure its survival, the rest of the world be damned. Overpopulation is a HUGE crisis, but you're goin' to hell if you use birth control, says the Pope.
    • Is used to exploit the rich and poor alike. Everyone screams blue bloody murder about the church of scientology, but conveniently forgets that the Catholic church used to offer get-out-of-hell-free services for cold hard cash(interesting how god forgives all for $ when the church coffers are low), and is currently the wealthiest organization in the world. Not that the wealth is accessible though- when people finally started suing the church for ignoring the fact that priests were raping their kids, do you think Pope John Paul 3rd gave up his gold cup, or traded in the Popemobile for something a little less fancy? Phhbt. No, they cut back welfare programs and sold off some property in Massachusetts.

    I think religion is probably the greatest scam ever invented.

    1. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by helix_r · · Score: 3, Insightful


      What do you mean "...especially in Italy..."?

      Please drop the stereotype, man, you clearly don't have a clue about Italians.

      If it happened in small town in rural America, people would be acting the same.

    2. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by laetus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude, you've got a seriously skewed view of religion.

      I'm a network geek. I've completed my B.S. and M.S., both in technical fields. And I believe in God and Jesus. And:

      • I don't turn to God for explanations of everything. That's why He gave us brains and free will. And yes, I'm comfortable with leaving things undefined and not using God to fill the gap.
      • I'm more controlled by an increasingly regulatory US government than I am by religion. My faith teaches me to treat others with the kindness and respect that I would have others show me. It doesn't, however, regulate me for the profits of the music industry.
      • Not all faiths believe that birth control is evil.
      • And finally RELIGION != FAITH IN GOD. If you've got a problem with organized religion, that's not God's problem, but man's. God never told anyone not to think for themselves. If you're dumb enough to turn over your thinking to a religious Pope/Evangelist/whatever, that's your idiocy, not God's.

      You need to get out of that Middle Age's thinking about God. There's alot of us out here proclaiming the Good News and living our lives believing in God, educating ourselves, and working intelligently.

      --

      "We're sorry, but the website you're trying to reach has been disconnected."
    3. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by firewrought · · Score: 3, Interesting
      They don't. They usually assume it's god.

      Humans are kinda in a rush to assign blame, or rather... attribute intention for events with socially relevant consequences. If it impacts us socially, our brains insist that somebody must have intended it, even if we also have a readily available mechanical explanation.

      Or at least, that's the premise of Religion Explained. It's a fascinating read.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    4. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by t14m4t · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do you think some of the most religious people are often absolute morons, and many intelligent, well-educated people often aren't highly religious? Idiots need an explanation for everything, intelligent people seek answers and do not believe in what they cannot prove to themselves.

      You know, I used to think that, too. Then I realized that there are an awful lot of really smart people that are extremely religious, too. Albert Einstein, if I recall correctly, was a devout believer. Isaac Newton, when he was developing calculus and his theory of gravity, was trying to understand God.

      It is the desire to understand God that has driven virtually all of scientific history, from Galileo to Planck, and only recently has science been transformed into only the desire to undersand our world. And even then, anyone with half a brain would see that we're really juyst trying to understand what God has given us, if you believe in God (see below). Of the viewpoint that I'm trying to expouse in this paragraph, I can't think of anything that can articulate it better the the end of the movie Contact.

      I have come to the belief that religion is not about whether you can explain it or not, or even if it makes sense. If it had to make sense, there wouldn't be any Mormons or Scientologists. But all it really requires for belief in God is exactly that -- belief.

      I for one do not actually believe. But I can see the draws to belief, and they are so strong that I sometimes have think twice about my reactions. Am I particularly bright? I don't think so. But neither do I think I'm really dumb.

      So what's my point? Well, I guess it's that the part of your post I'm quoting was idiotic and immature, born of a sense of moral superiority for your beliefs and contempt for the viewpoints of others. I used to be the same way; only recently, I saw the errors of that way of thinking, and have become more tolerant and open-minded towards people who beilve in God, Allah, Krishna, Zeus, Ra, or whatever faith you believe in. The rest of your post, on it's own merits, I belive to be accurate; however, in light of the point you were trying to make, is wholly inaccurate and inadequate as to what religion actually provides a society.

      After all, after everything is said and done, you can't DISPROVE God; absence of proof is not proof of absence. Since you can't disprove it, you have to take into account that God is possible. Belief in God is just as credible -- not more than, and not less than (and that's the key point) -- as my belief that God does not actually exist, and is in fact a creation of our own minds.

      Although maybe one of these days I'll be proven wrong. I look forward to that day.

      Responses are welcome; this is the biggest area that I spend idle moments thinking.

      weylin

      --
      67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
    5. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by torpor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think religion is probably the greatest scam ever invented.

      Behind Health Insurance, you mean ...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    6. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by FictionPimp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think its Cuthulu. Only the dead but sleeping god would have the power to do this. Quickly look for the burning sword in the sky that annouces the end of the world and pray that Marduk comes with the secret word shape and number to save us. I have spoken with the 50 incarnations of Marduk and they tell me we have nothing to fear if we pray to Iniaana to save us.

      what makes you think my religion, the religion of the oldest know civilized people is not right?

    7. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...I believe in God and Jesus...There's alot of us out here proclaiming the Good News

      Your point would have been so much better if you'd just been able to avoid the "Jesus" and "Good News" bits. If you'd left out those two little peculiar bits of irrelevant, religion-specific trivia, you'd have made a satisfactory argument in defense of faith in general. Instead, you sound like one of those Christian nut-jobs who think it's OK to go around asking strangers if they've "taken Jesus Christ as their savior".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by juhaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Albert Einstein, if I recall correctly, was a devout believer.

      If you mean devout believer as in Christian or Jewish belief, no, you do not recall correctly at all.

      Einstein did not believe on the stupid "man-on-steroids" god of most religions, Einsteins belief was pantheistic, that universe itself is God, he believed in a "God who reveals himself in the harmony of all that exists, not in a God who concerns himself with the fate and actions of men".

      After all, after everything is said and done, you can't DISPROVE God

      I can't disprove the tooth fairy either. Is it just as likely to exist then, than not?

    9. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by t14m4t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's basically what I was saying, you're just taking the words, changing the modifier, and stating it differently. I'll demonstrate.

      Let's define three states: you believe in the existence of God to some degree, you disbelieve the existence of God to some degree, and you have no idea. Then, either belief is as credible as disbelief, or belief is as incredible as disbelief.

      The only difference between the two is whether you believe that belief is credible. In the fiorst form of the statement, you are saying "I don't know, but either could be right." The second form says something along the lines of "I don't know, but both are wrong."

      Both cases lead to agnosticism, albeit different forms thereof. I happen to be of the former viewpoint, and your statemtnt lends itself to the latter. I yield that your viewpoint is as good as mine.

      weylin

      heh. after writing all this, I think I see what you were actually getting at. I apologize for the confusion; I was not trying to state that my entire viewpoint is that I believe God is a figment; rather, I consider myself to be an agnostic. I believe that one of two possibilities is true, and I don't have the necessary tools to determine which: either (a) God is a figment, and so should be derided for it's ability to cede humanities triumphs to some non-existent farce, or (b) God (or some supereme/supernatural being living outside the bounds of our own existence) is real, and I couldn't even begin to expound on the consequences that would have on existence. However, I also believe that people that take any of these as TRUTH have as much right as I do to believe what they believe, and are capable of being equally as clear-headed as I consider myself to be (though the argument thereto is for another time).

      --
      67.5% Slashdot Pure I guess I need to work on that.... :)
    10. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by Godeke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can attest to the fact many people turn to God to explain technology when they don't understand it. I was sitting in church when the question was asked of a small group of members: "How does TV work." The expected answer was that the TV station transmitted a signal the TV received... not looking for a technical answer here (and they were heading for an analogy, but that is beside the point). From the group, who had been so indoctrinated that they couldn't think for themselves anymore, the answer rose: "God's will".

      It was the last time I attended church. Yes, some of those people were intelligent (the one asking the question had far higher hopes than that - he never got to apply his obvious analogy he was working towards), but it felt *wrong* to sit in a room knowing that these people didn't just have faith where faith was potentially appropriate: they had faith indiscriminately. To them, the light switch was powered by God, the microwave worked because God did not see it as evil, and TV was beamed from heaven direct (must not have *watched* too much TV recently, eh?).

      After some years of thinking about this situation, I have come to a realization that you don't need a higher power to explain the organization of the universe. (Previously, I had my doubts about the complexity arising spontaniously, a common doubt of even scientifically minded people). Quantum mechanics says that until an event is observed, the outcome is a probability wave. Upon observation, that wave collapses. Taking this to the logical conclusion, after the creation of the universe (big bang or string colision or whatever) there was a huge, unobserved probability wave. Upon one part of that wave stumbling across the unlikely (but part of the probabilty wave) creation of an "observer", that observer would cause the wave to collapse locally, influencing the rest of the wave from that point forward. In other words, every outcome was equally likely until an observer becomes an outcome of the probability wave. Once that happens, the observer is no longer just a probability, but a fact. More simply: a quantum mechanical universe favors the creation of observers. Of course, this conclusion is simply the creation of my own brain: perhaps someone has a refutation?

      --
      Sig under construction since 1998.
    11. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by forand · · Score: 2, Insightful
      God never told anyone not to think for themselves.

      Determinists. You CANNOT think for yourself if your god already planned everything for you to do.

      Also while I agree that people should move out of "Middle Age's thinking about God" there are some who are just moving into that sort of thinking. You appear to be englighted, so to speak, while many other people who are part of organized religions tend to believe much the opposite to your stance, ignoring that and nothing will change.
    12. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by ponxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Dude, you've got a seriously skewed view of religion.

      One might argue that it's atheists who have a less skewed view of religion as they're not part of it.

      > And finally RELIGION != FAITH IN GOD

      Religion = "the belief in and worship of a god or gods, or any such system of belief and worship:" (from http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define.asp?key=667 31&dict=CALD )

      Anyway, to many people who are not religious, the belief in a god, and particularly the common varieties that send their children to earth, seemingly arbitrarily bless or smite people etc. are as real as Father Christmas or Zaphod Beeblebrox.

      The mere fact that a lot of people believe it is no convincing argument, especially when those people proclaim their belief being due to faith rather than any evidence. For 1000s of years everyone believed the earth was flat.

      Even today, a lot of people believe summer is warmer than winter because the earth is closer to the sun then, or that the entire world is only 6000 years old because some religous nut tells them so, or any other number of demonstrably wrong things. The number of people believing something is not sufficient reason to assume it is true.

      This is precisely the reason i trust science more than tradition or religion: Scientific dogma is subject to revision in the face of new evidence, religious dogma usually isn't. It's 2000 years out of date.

      > If you're dumb enough to turn over your thinking to a religious
      > Pope/Evangelist/whatever, that's your idiocy, not God's.

      So who did you turn your thinking over to? What made you a "believer"? A charismatic person? An old book? Indoctrination from your community? Peer pressure? Anyway, i completely agree with your statement bar the last two words...

    13. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by centauri · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't adopt or reject a belief just because someone you admire did. That's what leads to everything that's wrong with religion. I don't believe in calculus just because Newton did. I believe in it because I can prove it to myself that it is true. I don't believe in gods because I can't prove to myself that they are real, not because Dr. So-and-So doesn't believe in gods.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Durga.
    14. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Funny, the thread was started by an athiest (or at least religon hostile individual) who was trying to "cram" his ideas "down our throats". This fellow you're replying to just presented a different view, and said it was his and shared by others.

      You're the one stating your idea is "correct". He's just saying that his ideas are his. Since I'm not going to share either of your ideas perfectly, I'd say he makes for a better neighbor than you.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    15. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by QuantumFTL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, that's one of the best slashdot posts I've ever read! I'm tired of religion bashing on /. (I mean, obviously it's their right to do so, it's the moderators I'm more upset with). Atheistic humanism is as much of a religion as anything else, and to be honest I think the most logical (although boring) choice is to be agnostic.

      I'm a Christian and I study physics, and people so often ask me how I can be a Christian and believe so much in Science... I think for some people science has become the new religion - it gives us all the answers, except to the most important questions (why are we here? what is right/wrong?). I work on the Mars Exploration Rovers mission and I was upset to see so many posts on slashdot saying that finding life on another planet would mean the end of religion... I don't get this! Many people working on the mission are Christians (or also some other faiths) and they are all very excited by the prospect, as am I! People assume too much about things they do not understand.

      Thanks again for a great post!

      Cheers,
      Justin

    16. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by ryanwright · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You need to get out of that Middle Age's thinking about God. There's alot of us out here proclaiming the Good News and living our lives believing in God, educating ourselves, and working intelligently.

      Damn straight. I've added you to my friends list. There's nothing more satisfying than running across a fellow geek who lives his life for Jesus Christ.

      Don't sweat the other replies. They'll understand the truth some day. Unfortunately, it will be too late for most of them.

      Romans 14:11: For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    17. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by ratamacue · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think religion is probably the greatest scam ever invented.

      Your points apply to government (organized coercion) more so than religion (organized persuasion).

      Throughout history, governments have killed millions of times more, and plundered millions of times more than religious institutions. (Where religious institutions have killed and plundered, it is usually because they are associated somehow with government.) I think it is quite obvious that government, not religion, deserves the crowning of "greatest scam ever invented".

    18. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If he substituted "Buddha" and "Tao", would it make a difference?

      You are condemning him as a "nut-job" just because he used two key-words specific to his religion. You sound Jesusphobic.

    19. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by Sharkeys-Day · · Score: 2, Insightful

      perhaps someone has a refutation?

      Define "observer".

    20. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by Jim+Starx · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It is still stupid to believe in wrong things

      But you can't proove his beliefs are wrong. He can't proove yours are either. So I don't see how either of your views are more or less stupid then the others.

      --
      The darkness... controls the music. The music... controls the soul.
    21. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now, if you'd said anecdotal evidence rather than empirical, I might agree with you...

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    22. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by mph · · Score: 2, Informative
      What, it's not? I mean, at least "their half" of the Earth is, isn't it? The other half would be further away, thus the total movement (towards/away from the sun, at least -- not around it) of the Earth would be roughly zero, but in a local sense, they are right.
      You appear to understand, correctly, that the seasons arise from the tilt of the earth's axis, and that when it's summer in your hemisphere, your hemisphere is tilted toward the sun.

      But that's not an important effect as far as the distance to the sun goes. The earth's orbit is slightly elliptical, with the sun at one focus of the ellipse. So there's a time of year when the earth is closest to the sun, and a time six months later when it's more distant. The difference in these distances, due to the shape of the orbit, is much larger than the difference in distance that arises from the earth's tilt. The earth is closest to the sun in January, and farthest in July. The difference is about 3 million miles, which is obviously a lot larger than the earth's diameter, and so clearly much larger than the effect of the tilt. Since the whole earth is closest to the sun in January, but the northern and southern hemispheres are in opposite seasons, clearly it is not the distance that's determining the season.

      The tilt determines the season by making the sunlight fall more directly (more nearly vertically) and for a longer time each day during the summer.

    23. Re:It's Not Magic, It's God(TM) by Troy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      So who did you turn your thinking over to? What made you a "believer"? A charismatic person? An old book? Indoctrination from your community? Peer pressure?


      Yes, because the only reason someone would hold religious faith is because of indoctrination, peer pressure, or a cult of personality. It also goes without saying that such people have stopped thinking for themselves.

      WOW

      You've hauled out so many tired charicatures of religious faith in so short a time that when I see you accuse someone else of not thinking, the words "plank" and "eye" come to mind.

      Of course, that's a Biblical reference, which outs me as being a religious person as well. Accordingly, you're free to put my comments in whatever pigeonhole makes you most comfortable and continue a happy life of ignorance.

      XOXO,
      Some mindless religious guy
  35. Suspicious timing by cgenman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Anyone else find it suspicious that Slashdot picks this up from MSNBC on the 8th of April, who ran this from Reuters on Monday the 5th. Reuters Italy then must have had it sometime around Friday the 2nd, which would put the first printing of the story on... Which day is that again?

    1. Re:Suspicious timing by platipusrc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, The Register's article is dated February 11, 2004.

      --
      And the muscular cyborg German dudes dance with sexy French Canadians
  36. Typical Sicilian by mirr0red · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not Sicilian, but I live in ITaly nonetheless. The media covered this issue for quite some time, although at the end, they seemed to blame natural electrical discharges given the zone is a very active sismic area in Sicily, but also it could have been due to the high-powere train lines which run only a few meters from the houses affected by the problems. There is also who blames the widespread illegal electrical connections setup by the local crooks...

    --
    // mirr0red
  37. Science, not superstition by BigBadBus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If anyone's interested, I've written a write-up of a scientists view of the supernatural, plus a discussion of the meagre evidence and theories here

    Best wishes

    Paul

  38. Zeus! by PTBNL · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Zeus, I apologize for sleeping with one of your many women. I'd appreciate it if you would stop with the lightning bolts, and just get on with turning me into some sort of half-turtle, half-game show host monstrosity to teach me the error of my ways. Cheers.

  39. Article more than a few weeks old by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It's more than a few weeks old. There's been a Wiki entry for some time and The Register had an article in early Feb.

    I realize that many wish to pump MS sites and their content partners, but could the editors filter out these and stick with less dangerous secondary sources?

    Ignore it and it will go away. Reuters, AP , UPI, BBC, etc. usually provide the content reported anyway. Other sources, e.g. The Reg., often do their own reporting as well.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  40. They're not THAT powerful.. by Benm78 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Although radar installations can pack quite a punch as far as radio-frequency energy output is concerned, the power levels are usually not sufficient to set something ablaze at any significant distances.

    A high-power military radar installation does put out enough power to kill an unfortunate bird (or incompetent engineer) at short distance, but still wouldn't do much more than disrupt electronic equipment at greater distances.

    However, it is not unthinkable that a relatively small disruption in an eletronic device can lead to a bigger problem later on - a disrupted control circuit causing an overload that leads to a fire is well possible. This scenario is not very feasible after main power is cut though.

  41. Most likely cause by Vreejack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is little need to invoke God or strange physics. A more likely explanation is at hand.

    The common thread to all of these are power sources, wires and people. The missing, unmentioned ingredient is the pocket knife or screwdriver concealed in the hand of the disturbed fellow who is causing the shorts.

    John Vreeland

    --
    "Will future ages believe that such stupid bigotry ever existed!" -- Ivanhoe
  42. Old News, Vatican Response by Luminous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has been reported on since February at which time, Father Gabriel Amorth, the Vatican's chief expert on exorcism said demonic forces cannot be ruled out. Now, of course, he has a vested interest in maintaining job security, so his opinion needs to be taken with a half-a-grain of salt.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  43. Re:There's nothing wrong with the word "supernatur by Mant · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Supernatural does not mean "things we don't yet understand", there is a term for those, and it is "things we don't yet understand". Any scientist worth anything will readily admit there is plenty of things we don't understand.

    To describe something as supernatural instantly carries very strong connotations of magic, miracle, or some paranormal force that is not just unknown science, but something other than it and beyond it

    As for quacks, they are just that. By sheer chance a few will be end up being partially right about something becuase so many people have so many crazy ideas. Thing is, you can't tell the ones who are right by chance from the rest without working through it. It is as important to know why you are right as being right, those scientists "scaling the rocky face" are doing the important work.

  44. CICAP's take on this by pamar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First of all, this is pretty old news in Italy.

    Here is CICAP entry on this phenomenon (in Italian sorry).

    CICAP is a group of scientists who routinely investigate (and debunk) any so-called supernatural phenomenon in Italy (they cover anything: ESP, religious miracles, even omeopathy). Sort of a James Randi fan club.

    I suppose most of Slashdot's reader cannot read Italian: the gist of it is that they suspect a prank. According to similar phenomena they investigated in the past, the first accidents are caused by natural causes (short-circuits, overload).

    But then people start talking, and making hypotesis, and someone starts causing this as a prank or a way to get attention, media coverage etc. Then CICAP arrives, and start looking aroud, and everything goes back to normal.

    CICAP sums this as follows: 100% of phenomena happen when controls are at 0% 0% of phenomena happen when controls are at 100%

  45. Sure it's weird, but an UNPLUGGED device? by Nuclear+Elephant · · Score: 2, Funny

    The fires have even consumed unplugged lamps and an entire apartment. Black scorch marks still scar the apartment walls.

    Did this community do a lot of eBay shopping?

  46. Re:There's nothing wrong with the word "supernatur by Himring · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To describe something as supernatural instantly carries very strong connotations of magic, miracle, or some paranormal force that is not just unknown science, but something other than it and beyond it

    Ancient peoples called things they didn't understand, "magic." They did not say this of things they did understand. They were not lunatics calling the crops they raised, "magic." To do so would have made them nuts to their ancient brethren.

    those scientists "scaling the rocky face" are doing the important work.

    Of course they are doing important work. And so is the child psychologist and the policeman and every other profession not a scientist, but, of course, you didn't say a policeman isn't doing important work, yet, see, look how these things go.

    We love to dis those who may be religious -- who think there's more to life than what appears to be or than what is contained in a science book, yet everyone here loves the xfiles....

    --
    "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
  47. Re:Neg by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Incorrect. Small enough wires/paths on chips will actually burst into flames if enough current passes through them such as during an EMP. Remember, the passage of current causes heat to be built up from resistance, and when the traces are as thin as they are on a lot of electronics, they can easily pass the explosive heat point of that metal. Example: put some metal in a microwave.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  48. Re:You need to read the Bible a little closer... by arkanes · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Somehow it doesn't suprise me that God is a pedant.

  49. Sounds like by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    They need to call Scooby-Doo and the gang.
    I can see it now...

    Old man Aldo was setting the fires whilst dressed in a demon costume.

    On the lighter side, marshmallow sales in the small village went up.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  50. Re:because... by misterpies · · Score: 4, Insightful


    One of the alarming things about slashdot is the way it really brings out the bigots in the community.

    Story about a sicilian village? Sure, they must be a bunch of superstitious peasants with a mental age of 11. Story about women? Cue for side-splitting 'jokes' about how dumb they are with computers and or crude sexual innuendo. (and then the authors wonder why they can't get a girlfriend). Story about India? Racial stereotypes alive and well.

    I'm not worried so much about the existence of these posts. The attraction of /. is that anybody can write anything. What worries me is the number of them that get modded up, which suggests that there's a strong undercurrent of slashdot opinion who sympathise with them. I don't think it's ideological, but there seem to be an awful lot of people out there who have never really looked outside their geek ghettos to try and understand the wider world.

    --
    The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
  51. Daemon-haunted world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, you mean Carl Sagan's "The Demon-Haunted World." "The Daemon-Haunted World" is Sagan's book about how your computer may be infested with programs that don't run until they're invoked by another application.

  52. Re:Highest Stress Job: Advisor to Tyrant by martyros · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Uum, I think he's probably talking about Nebuchadnazzer (sp?), who demanded that his advisors tell him not only what the dream meant, but what he had dreamed in the first place.

    My guess is that he thought his "advisors" were full of bull, and were trying to manipulate him. So he said, "If you guys are so in tune with the supernatural, you should be able to tell me my dream." (Sort of like, "Why doesn't the Psychic Hotline lady call me?")

    His advisors, understandably, said, "You're on crack -- no king in history has asked something like that", to which he replied, "I'll show you who's on crack..."

    --

    TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

  53. Apple sales are going to take a hit now... by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    Advertising with the name "firewire," this seems to give a whole new meaning to that.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  54. Mafia by BoomerSooner · · Score: 3, Funny

    They invent everything. It's just another protection scheme.

    There is a reason my grandparents left Sicily, it was a corrupt shithole.

    That being said I'm proud to be Italian (and English).

    1. Re:Mafia by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's just another protection scheme.

      Me thinks the RIAA DRM tactics are getting a bit out of hand.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  55. You've all been duped! A week late! by VoidPoint · · Score: 2, Informative

    A simple search on everyone's favorite search engine would have lead them to this CNN article dated April First. Of course, one need merely think about it really really hard to realize that spontaneous combustion and April Fools go together like baseball and apple pie. That would be cricket and guiness for our UK friends.

    1. Re:You've all been duped! A week late! by wolverine1999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story is not a joke - it was out months ago
      on italian tv and other news sites including www.worldnetdaily.com.

  56. Agreed by Marc2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Especially when the story mentions the head exorcist of the Catholic Church definitively calling this the work of the devil, when the local priest decided to sit this one out and let science have a go at it first. These people obviously aren't *that* removed from the outside world, even if they are filthy, filthy Italians.

    --
    --- What
  57. Does certain things stand out for anybody else? by KW802 · · Score: 2, Funny
    HHhhmmm.......

    ... weeks of sleeping in a nearby hotel and houses rented for them by the government... the phenomenon occurs only when there are people present... The evacuated families... gather almost every night in the three-star hotel perched above their abandoned village...

    You know, if I lived in some rural village and my government was willing to pay my rent to live in a 3-star hotel on a hillside, I think my appliances just might magically catch fire also.
    --
    Here am I sitting in a tin can, far above the world. Planet earth is blue & there's nothing I can do.
  58. Dude, you are seriously weak-minded. by IPFreely · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When I was young, ignorant and closed minded, I used to believe the same as you. Then I grew up and learned how people really work.

    So what is Weak Minded? It's this:
    1. The inability to accept that other people have valid motivations, ideals or valuable knowledge that that are different from your own.
    2. The inability to differentiate between what one person or one group do in the name of a cause, and the core purpose of that cause.

    There are a lot of people who wrap themselves in religion who are weak minded. There are a lot more that are not. There are a lot of people who wrap themselves in science who are weak minded. There are a lot more who are not. There are a lot of people who live in many different countries, societies, cultures who are weak minded. There are a lot more who are not. And out of all of these, many among the weak minded also tend to be the most vocal, so that is a lot of what you hear from them.

    Different people accept religion for different reasons. And different people abuse the name of religion for different reasons. David Koresh claimed to be Jesus. Few Christians believe or supported him. Osama claims to work in the name of Islam. Few Muslims believe or support him. Some Catholic priests have sexually assaulted children. Few Catholics support them. There have certainly been bad things done in the name of religion, but that does not mean the religion was the cause. Most often the cause was dangerious people doing bad things, and claiming religion as their cover.

    As for why people believe what religion teaches them rather than "modern science". That is probably because modern science is not taught as widely as you would like. It takes money, knowledge, political support, lots of people power, and strong social support to spread new knowledge. Churches have been around for centuries. They already have the structures in place to teach their docterine. Church schools exist in almost every town and country around the world teaching religion. Modern educational institutes in remote places are few and far between. This is not the fault of the people who live there. They learn what is available to them. And for many centuries, that was from the local church.

    Knowledge is relative. With all your great scientific knowledge, If you were dropped naked into the middle of the Amazon rain forest, you'd probably die of poison or starvation inside a week. All the while those stupid savages who worship their sun gods have been surviving there for generations just fine.

    We all learn and accept what our society and parents teach us. If your parents and society teach you science, great for you. If you are too ignorant or weak minded to accept that other people have different educational backgrounds, different social and physical needs, or different ideas about the unknown, AND THAT THESE DIFFERENCES ARE NOT EVIL, STUPID OR WRONG, then that's too bad for you.

    --
    There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    1. Re:Dude, you are seriously weak-minded. by Wintergrey · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While I agree that being open-minded is certainly one of the best attributes that one can have, I do not believe that we can assume everything is automatically acceptable or correct because it is different from one's own point of view. There comes a time when one must simply say, "This is incorrect." If something does not make sense, then it does not make sense. If something contains an error in logic, then it contains an error in logic. It is a mistake. It is wrong (and not in the evil sense, but in the incorrect sense). Provided the evidence has been examined and given a rational analysis, then this is proper thing to do. Of course, we should be willing to question any knowledge that we've learned, and that includes anything put forth by religion AND science, because as we've seen many times in history, both can be wrong. As long as we do so and use our brains to remain open-minded, critical thinkers, then we will be better off.

      I do not see the rejection of an institution of religion as absolvement for irrationality. Just because you reject certain dogma and do not approve of past abuses/atrocities does not mean that you are free and clear of irrational thought. You still accept the core beliefs and make the same basic assumptions as the church has regarding the existence of a god and its basic morality. Have you ever questioned those? Have you ever questioned the base axioms of religion, personal, institutional or otherwise? Have you ever considered that perhaps religion's problems and past abuses are not the result of a corruption of the system, but the result of the values and beliefs that comprise the system's core? Have you ever questioned the core values behind religion? I use the term loosely to include all types of religion, including just a simple belief in the values of God/Allah/whatever outside of the institutional belief structure. Just because you don't buy into institutionalized dogma does not mean that you are not just selectively creating your own.

      You have to be careful with your beliefs and assumptions so that you do not blind yourself to life and reality. You have to question yourself and your beliefs when presented with an argument that runs counter to your own thoughts on a subject. If by doing so, you find your beliefs are still valid, then good. Question them again the next time the chance presents itself. With time comes experience and with experience comes insight for those open-minded enough to pay attention to it. If you question them once and then never question them again, then I hope that you are absolutely certain in their veracity.

      You cannot just slush off another's belief by calling them young and foolish. With age comes experience, true, but an 80-year old is every bit as capable of holding irrational beliefs as a 20-year old, a 10-year old or a 40-year old. In many cases, age works as a deterrent to open-mindedness when people become set in their ways and refuse to acknowledge that they may be wrong, which often happens with spiritual beliefs. The opening line: "When I was young, ignorant and closed minded, I used to believe the same as you. Then I grew up and learned how people really work." implies the same type of vague promise of future knowledge/enlightenment that was one of the grandparent's main complaints. What is more likely is that as you get older and have this argument time and time again, is that you get tired and stop fighting. You give in. This is not the knowledge of experienced wisdom; that is the cover-up of a quitter. Of course, maybe you have found a good reason why the logic of atheism is flawed. If so, I'd like to hear it. I'd be most interested.

      As far as relative knowledge goes, being naked in the Amazon rain forest does not immediately invalidate your prior knowledge of anything. The knowledge that you had is not suddenly useless or wrong just because you're deep in the jungle. It just is not applicable in that particular situation. A person that is able to think critically and accept the reali

  59. It's a hotspot by seanmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

    Richard: We've been coming here for years -- suddenly, everybody has an exploding laptop... what gives?

    Ricardo: It's a hot spot.

    Richard: A hot spot?

    Ricardo: A hot spot, broadband, wireless, a tipping point. One hot spot... a blip. Ten... a novelty. Then shit starts exploding... billions of dollars fly through the air and spontaneously combusting.

    Richard: Billions?

    Ricardo: Billions. (faces Richard) Watch your head.

    Sean: (asking Richard) How's our securAAAAAAARGH MY CELL PHONE JUST EXPLODED IN MY FRONT POCKET!!!!!!

    Title: IBM SECURITY FOR THE ON DEMAND, SPONTANEOUSLY-COMBUSTING WORLD

  60. Re:You need to read the Bible a little closer... by Kent+Simon · · Score: 4, Funny

    For some reason, I would think God's wrath is much more impressive than lighting up a few telephone wires in a city who's population is 39.

    --
    Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
  61. satan took over my keyboard by bl8n8r · · Score: 2, Funny

    > "I've seen things like this before," he told the
    >daily Il Messaggero. "Demons occupy a house and
    >appear in electrical goods."
    I have seen this too. It is usually manifested in the form of a great deal of pr0n downloaded onto my harddisk. I have no idea how it gets there.

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  62. Re:hmmm,.. where's the video? by VoidPoint · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A simple search on everyone's favorite search engine would have lead them to this CNN article dated April First. Of course, one need merely think about it really really hard to realize that spontaneous combustion and April Fools go together like baseball and apple pie. That would be cricket and guiness for our UK friends.

  63. Appliance Demons by LabRat007 · · Score: 2, Funny

    'I've seen things like this before. Demons occupy a house and appear in electrical goods.'- -- Gabriele Amorth Exorcist

    Generally you don't see that kind of behavior in a major appliance. - "Ghostbusters"

    --
    "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  64. Re:hmmm,.. where's the video? by hellmarch · · Score: 2, Interesting
  65. A Mysterious Unbalanced power factor? by asbestos_tophat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A Mysterious Unbalanced power factor?

    Most likely one of the following:

    1.) Old fabric-insulated wire systems and new power hungry appliances
    2.) Old aluminium based wire (the Ausies had fun with that technology)
    3.) Temperature coefficients of conductor increased resistance under load causing thermo run-away by overloading power systems.
    4.) Step-down transformer has become unbalanced
    5.) Transient suppression condensers are not inline between the town's sub-stations
    6.) Magic-8-Ball says the "air conditioners" did it, surly a power plot.

  66. USB Printer Status by prat393 · · Score: 4, Funny
    In linux kernels, drivers/usb/class/usblp.c declares an array of strings with the status of USB printers as:
    static char *usblp_messages[] = { "ok", "out of paper", "off-line", "on fire" };
    1. Re:USB Printer Status by mrphish697 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Looks like they've taken the "on fire" string out. It's still present in 2.4.18-3 in printer.c, but in 2.4.20-8 it's been replaced with "unknown error". Sad to see the lighter hearted stuff go as development continues, but I guess it's part of the "maturing" process.

      --
      You can't ride two horses with one ass
    2. Re:USB Printer Status by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC, it was a message logged when a parallel port device raised the error line but didn't send an error code. The "On fire" was not a statement but a question, as in "lp0: Reports error but not out-of-paper, not paper jammed, not offline. On fire?"

    3. Re:USB Printer Status by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      on 2.4.18 in arch/i386/kernel/bluesmoke.c there is a kernel error message in the machine check handler for Pentium class Intel chips that reads:

      if(lotype&(15)) printk(KERN_EMERG "CPU#%d: Possible thermal failure (CPU on fire ?).\n", smp_processor_id());

    4. Re:USB Printer Status by DonGar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I remember correctly, there was a specific model that prompted that because it had a problem with the print head getting stuck. There were no safeties on the positioning motor which (if not stopped) would keep trying to move the head until it overheated and, well, caught fire.

      I beleive that smoke from the drive belt was more common than actual fires.

      --
      plus-good, double-plus-good
    5. Re:USB Printer Status by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was possible with the old thermal printers. I remember hearing about the early days of fax spam, when they used actual fax machines to send. People would send back the black loop and it would cause the recipients machine to actually catch fire.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  67. Natural Tesla by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Natural atmospheric conditions in the sky can cause lightning, could an unusual atmospheric charge cause something tesla-like naturally at ground level?

    How about underground, if there were enough minerals capable of transporting electrical impulses?

  68. Not A Huge Surprise by Smilodon · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you have ever owned an old Fiat, the concept of Italian electronics spontaneously combusting is not that far fetched. ;)

  69. Re:Highest Stress Job: Advisor to Tyrant by DCowern · · Score: 4, Funny

    (Sort of like, "Why doesn't the Psychic Hotline lady call me?")

    That's how it works in Soviet Russia...

  70. It *could* be... by mengel · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The article says:
    Police ruled out a possible prankster or pyromaniac after they saw wires burst into flames.
    You know, I bet that if you soaked plastic-insulated wires in liquid oxygen for a few minutes, then left the room, the next person to turn on the item in question would get an effect very much like that...

    If you read This reference under "Combustibility", it says:

    In the presence of an appreciable oxygen concentration, a spark on certain materials may cause them to burst into flame, whereas in air, fire would not result. (For this reason, liquid oxygen should never be stored or used in small closed compartments, rooms or excavations without added ventilation. Well ventilated storage and working space should be provided.) Materials that should be of special concern in this respect are wood, plastic, powdered metals, combustible rags and clothing.
    Now when you consider that dunking a wire and plastic in liquid oxygen is also likely to cause lots of heat-stress fractures in both the now-brittle plastic and the metal...

    Whoosh!

    --
    - "History shows again and again how nature points out the folly of men" -- Blue Oyster Cult, 'Godzilla'
  71. This is what happens when you.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...don't pay your SCO license.

  72. Piezo Electrics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't know if anyone posted this but could there be a relationship to Piezo Eletrical activity.

    I wonder if they have done any kind of surveying or tests for minerals (assaying). Is there any sign of tectonic movement? I have no idea what I am talking about.

  73. Re:X Files Movie Plot? by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry he's been replaced by Faux Smoulder.

    --
  74. Living Pranks by Raven_Stark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is interesting how a prank can take on a life of its own. When I worked for a summer camp for kids, I made up a story about a boy getting killed at camp and him returning to haunt it. I presented it as fact. (I'm a bastard, I know.)

    Over the following few days I elaborated on the story as it took on a life of its own. Soon frightened teens came to me because a vending machine stalked then attacked them. Even adults were decieved. A group of three men insisted that one night the dead boy tried to climb into their canoe and tipped it over. Probably much more happened that I don't even know about since I heard people saying all sorts of strange things to eachother. They didn't say it to me, because I'd been forgotten as the originator of the story.

    Anyway, I can see how a simple short circuit and some story telling could cause people to burn a city...or a city to burn people (Salem). I bet I could even start a new religion and have a million followers before I died, if I were that type. I'm sure I'm not the only one who knows this, probably explains a lot about religion and government.

    It is interesting to note that some even became leaders in bringing my story to life, much like preachers...

    I confessed to my lies when I deemed the situation out of control. Some thought it was funny. One guy hit me, hard. Some decided I was lying about it being a lie. These were all ordinary people--no nuts.

    --
    http://www.marxist.com/
  75. Lawnmower Man... by ticklemeozmo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Always applying religion when there is a simple more rational solution.

    Jobe obviously wasn't killed by the mangetic core reactor as we thought he was... *looks around*

    --
    When modding "Informative", please make sure it both has a source and IS actually informative.
  76. It's dark matter baby! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, but extraordinary claims demand extraordinary proof.

    I'm a scientist myself, and I'm taking devil's advocate here, but don't take that to mean that I'm not being sincere in what I say.

    First of all, extraordinary claims DO NOT demand extraordinary proof, and it annoys me every time I read that. Extraordinary claims demand ordinary proof, just like everything else. Many claims which we now consider proven (leaving aside the epistemological claim that nothing can ever be proven) were once considered extraordinary. According to the scientific method of empirical research, after enough tests come out positive, a hypothesis becomes a working theory. Period. It doesn't matter how extraordinary the claim is, there is no scientific "raising of the bar" for one claim versus another claim. If there was, we probably couldn't get any science done because we would have to examine every hypothesis for its "extraordinaryness" and set the bar accordingly.

    Secondly, science tends to be dismissive of "faith" in favor of "science", but sometimes the things which are believed in "science" are uncomfortably close to "faith". For instance, let's take Einstein's General Theory of Relativity.

    The GTOR works remarkably well on the scale of the solar system, so well, in fact, that we can predict the position of a planet 100 years from now within spitting distance of where it will actually be.

    However, it's long been (what I would characterize as) an article of *faith* among physicists that the GTOR applied equally well throughout the universe, and indeed for a long time it was believed despite evidence to the contrary. Nowadays, we know that there's not near enough visible matter in the universe to make Einstein's equations work in our own galaxy, much less the universe. So what's the answer? Dark matter baby!

    Well, to make matters (no pun intended) worse, we now know that the galaxies are moving away from each other at an *accelerating* rate. Now this cannot be accounted for at all, even with dark matter! Even if we're right about dark matter, the galaxies should not accelerate away from each other. So what is the answer? Dark energy baby!

    Now, to an outside observer such as myself (I am not a physicist), it might seem that scientists were clinging to their old beliefs and trying to shape the universe to fit them, rather than admitting that they're wrong. In other words, they're taking the GTOR on faith, in spite of evidence to the contrary.

    A physicist can say that the GTOR is evidence for "dark matter", and "dark energy", despite having absolutely no direct evidence for either one, only the indirect evidence that GTOR won't work without it. In the same way, someone who believes in God can do so because, well, we exist, and we had to come from somewhere. Science doesn't even attempt to answer the question of how the universe came about (if you reply with the big bang, please explain where the infinitely dense infinitely small point came from), so really, it's comical when a scientist ridicules a believer in God.

    Do you see what I'm saying? Most scientists would admit that the question of the origin of the universe is one that science could never answer. Why then do they try so hard to discredit the belief in God? Science has no business even getting into the argument, at least until they come up with a reasonable explanation themselves.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  77. is there any holy ground nearby? by Trygve · · Score: 2, Funny

    Perhaps an immortal was killed on holy ground? Seems much less severe than the last time this happened, though (Pompeii).

    TV teaches me so much. I'm glad I gave up that bad habit. ;-p

  78. The Core by stinkydog · · Score: 2, Funny

    You all laughed at The Core , but now the effects of the government expierements are rising to the surface. Stock up now on unobtanium now, the market will go through the roof soon. Forget your foil hats (they attract electrical discharges anyway) crack out the asbestos underpants and the SPF 1000. And don't forget to send those Apocolypse Day Cards.

    SD


    IMDB link for the clueless.

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
  79. Determinism vs. God by booch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't really believe in God per se, but I do believe in Determinism.

    I grew up Catholic, but now I'm pretty much an agnostic: God may exist, but I don't think I can make such a determination, and I'm not sure what God is like if he does exist. I suspect that if there is a God, it's more of an "energy of the Universe" thing than a conscious being. (I just read up on Pantheism on Wikipedia from a link in this thread.) I definitely don't think God is going to change the laws of physics to help me win a baseball game.

    But as an amateur physicist, I believe in Determinism. Time-space is a single entity. The Universe encompasses all space, so it must encompass all space-time as well. If we anthropomorphize the Universe (or suppose that there is any omniscient being) we can imagine Him sitting at the end of time (as we view it). He can look back from the end of time to our current time and know what we will do next.

    However, I also believe in Free Will. I guess that makes it Soft Determinism. (Found on Wikipedia that it's also called Compatibilism.) While my actions may be pre-determined from the perspective of all time-space, my conscious mind does not exist in that reality. From my perspective, I am free to choose. Think of a book you're reading for the second time -- you know what's going to happen at any point in time, but you can't change it. But when you read it the first time (when you were a part of the moment) you didn't know what was going to happen.

    It's an interesting characteristic of the human mind that it can simultaneously hold seemingly opposing ideas.

    I'd also like to point out that Science doesn't prove things to be true either. It can prove things to be false, and provide strong evidence that theories are correct. But it can never provide the truth. So we're basically putting our faith in Science, just as many put their faith in religion.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  80. Stranger things have happened... by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 2, Funny

    favorite quote: "Demons occupy a house and appear in electrical goods."

    I knew it was a demon that shocked the crap out of me last week when I was soldering a live wire!!!

  81. Already diagnosed by Hollywood... by Cervantes · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This sounds suspiciously like the opening few minutes of "The Core". Is it possible something similar is happening?

    And, if so, does anyone know how to fix it? I fell asleep about 20 minutes into that bomb... I sure hope they key to our salvation wasn't in there somewhere.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  82. Determinism by ingenuus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's an excellent brief summary of Chaos Theory. It is certainly a useful model type in many cases, but I wonder if it is truly defining of our reality.

    As you imply, the illusion of non-determinism can exist in a deterministic system, which makes me curious as to whether non-determinism actually exists in our Universe?

    If it does exist, then the grandparent could be right and non-determinism could exist throughout all of reality, which, when analyzing, we could simply write off as variations in measurement.

    On a grander scale, many people are content to believe that a kernel of non-determinism lies at the heart of human "free will". Modern society does not blame fate for human actions, but rather the humans themselves. In keeping with this ideology, the paradox of "free will" versus a deterministic universe arises.

    It seems that non-determinism vs determinism is a dilemma which cannot be objectively solved because absolute prediction about the future is impossible since we cannot effectively gather sufficient information (Heisenberg).

    Some may say that this paradox is irrelevant since there is effectively no objective difference between non-determinism and uncertainty, but belief in non-determinism ("free will") has certainly influenced our society, and very arguably for the better... though, obviously, such an argument is recursive since it assumes the "free will" to choose. :)

    Maybe I'm missing something. Any insight for me? In any case, thanks for prompting my muse.

  83. Re:Historical records? by FlyingOrca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see any convincing evidence in any of the Wikipedia sources; if you follow the links, they lead either to (1) religious writings, with an obvious reason for bias, or (2) sources that are questioned by non-Christian historians because of the possibility of tampering during transcription.

    Also, I have no particular "faith" that the Christian bible is not accurate. What I said was that I don't consider it an accurate source of historical information. And by the way, it's far from "the only written account of history that goes back that far".

    If this sort of thing interests you, though, may I draw your attention to an interesting book I read about today? Tom Harpur, long-time religion columnist for the Toronto Star and former Anglican priest, has written a book called _The Pagan Christ_. In it he discusses the idea that the Christ figure is a synthesis of other religious traditions. There's a Globe and Mail article on it here:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNe ws /TPStory/LAC/20040408/HARPUR08/Entertainment/Idx

    The article makes the book sound worth reading. Cheers!

    --
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.