Slashdot Mirror


For Sale: Lycos.com

prostoalex writes "Terra Lycos is planning to sell Lycos.com. The price, quoted by News.com.com.com, is in the $200 mln range, while the original acquisition amounted to $12.5 bln. Lycos is currently re-inventing itself as a portal for the new generation with the link to Playboy affiliate placed right on the front page (click on "Adults 18+ only")."

215 comments

  1. Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Terra's aquisition of Lycos was an exercise in stupdity. See, Terra's a pretty big company with plenty of successful Spanish-language sites... but there's absoultely no synergy to be found in merging a group of English-langauge sites with Spanish-language sites. You can't share content accross the langages unless you have a ton of people doing translations.

    One of the original webcrawling search engines ended up getting bought up by somebody who didn't know what to do with it. So, it got shuffled asside into a "network" of poorly defined brand, and faded into obscurity. Lycos as a search engine is now worthless. Maybe there's some value left in the brand name for somebody who wants to do a relaunch, but this dog has been relauched so many times I don't think you can teach it any new tricks anymore.

    The market scorecard shows it exactly... $200 billion going in, $12.5 billion going out. They misplaced 15/16th of the value that they started with.

    1. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ...$200 billion going in, $12.5 billion going out...

      What are you smoking?

    2. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...$200 billion going in, $12.5 billion going out...

      What are you smoking?


      Sorry... 90s era accounting. Can I restate those numbers to be in the millions instead?

    3. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. Only half of them.

    4. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Nerd+With+Nalgene · · Score: 5, Informative

      $200 billion going in, $12.5 billion going out.

      That should be "$12.5 billion going in, $200 million going out" :-).

      --


      "as if nothing were solid...and that would be the end of the world, not fire and brimstone, but goo."--Rand
    5. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by DebianRcksLindowsLie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like Lindows. $63,000 in sales in 2002. $6,700,000 spent in 2002. More than $100 spent for every dollar brought in! At least you know what happened to the money you spent on mp3.com stock.

      This is why you use OGG.

    6. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll pay you $1,000 to cut off your hand. not enough? i'll pay you $100,000 to cut off your hand. not enough? i'll pay you $100,000,000 to cut off your hand. not enough? i'll pay you $1,000,000,000 to cut off your hand. at what point does the use of your own hand become more valuable than any amount of currency?

    7. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Joey7F · · Score: 1

      Which hand?

      --Joey

    8. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because it was still be wrong, unless you plan on only converting one of them AND changing the order.

    9. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean $12.5 billion going in, and $200 million going out. Which is 1.6% of its original value.

    10. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 1

      Ouch! That's a fire sale.

    11. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by rishistar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Who let Dr Evil in????

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    12. Re:Crashing back to Terra, er, Earth... by kfg · · Score: 1

      They misplaced 15/16th of the value that they started with.

      So that's where all that loose change under my sofa cushions came from.

      I know what I'm going to do with it too, start a business that only sells Scotch Tape, but. . .on the internet.

      KFG

  2. Can't fool me... by hamisht · · Score: 5, Funny
    (click on "Adults 18+ only")

    You won't catch me that easily goatse boy

    1. Re:Can't fool me... by moroderzone · · Score: 1

      GOD DAMN! Don't ruin things like that for me!

    2. Re:Can't fool me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! Some people just finished their evening routine looking at that chick!

      You made me feel disturbed.

    3. Re:Can't fool me... by h0tblack · · Score: 5, Funny

      I didn't see the "18+" link, but was intrigued by "The Lycos 50:Most Searched Bush".

    4. Re:Can't fool me... by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Their adult search engine is useless. I am just not satisfied with semi-clothed women showing a nipple at most, so I searched on some of my favorite things:

      -cream pie
      -zoo
      -gagging
      -scat
      -hentai
      -tentacle rape

      All of these gave the following answer:

      We're sorry -- either we did not understand your query or we do not yet have matching results. We have served results for "sex."


      And searching for "bukkake" gave me this:

      You have entered a search term or phrase that may relate to unlawful content or material. Rouze only indexes and lists the best in legal adult content. Results have not been provided for your search term, but are for the search term "sex". Feel free to take advantage of these listings, revise your search, or check out the other features on Rouze. Now go get what you came here for!

      This is useless. It's not a porn search engine. It's more like John Ashcroft.
      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    5. Re:Can't fool me... by carnivore302 · · Score: 1

      It's slashdotted already!

      --
      Please login to access my lawn
    6. Re:Can't fool me... by tomhudson · · Score: 1, Funny
      It says Adults 18+ content, but, if they're doing this ...
      Lycos is currently re-inventing itself as a portal for the new generation with the link to Playboy affiliate placed right on the front page (click on "Adults 18+ only").
      ... they got the numbers reversed, it should be Adults 81+ only - after all, Playboy is SO mid-last-century, and anyone who thinks it's cutting-edge on the sexual front MUST be senile!
    7. Re:Can't fool me... by t7 · · Score: 1

      Hit refresh a few times, and you'll see "The Lycos 50 Muppet Characters". Elmo takes first billing. If I'm not mistaken, doesn't Elmo belong to the Sesame Street Clan?

      Perhaps the Lycos Dog needs to be re-trained.

      "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt." ~ Mark Twain

    8. Re:Can't fool me... by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 1
      If I'm not mistaken, doesn't Elmo belong to the Sesame Street Clan?

      Yes, that's the "clan" to which he belongs. But he is a Muppet, so I don't see what the problem is.
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    9. Re:Can't fool me... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      As if John Ashcroft would even allow you to search for sex.

  3. Why pay for it now by Psykechan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll just wait until they fail to renew the domain and just pay the 35 bucks.

    1. Re:Why pay for it now by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll just wait until they fail to renew the domain and just pay the 35 bucks.

      Who's stupid enough to pay $35 a year to register a domain anymore?

    2. Re:Why pay for it now by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 1, Funny

      And then they'll sue you for trademark infringement and make the whole Lycos brand name worthwhile ;)

    3. Re:Why pay for it now by useosx · · Score: 4, Funny

      No big company would ever forget to re-register their domain names.

    4. Re:Why pay for it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the linked article:

      "Microsoft was busy covering up an almighty cock-up.."

      Are you implying that Microsoft execs have been caught streaking?

    5. Re:Why pay for it now by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Funny


      I'll buy it. Will they take my VALinux stock certificates in trade?

    6. Re:Why pay for it now by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny
    7. Re:Why pay for it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company (soluziona) is about 8000 employees and it is a result of merging several companies. Last year they forgot to renew the domain of one of the "subcompanies". As a result, no mail would fetch the office from the outside world.

      A colleage and me wanted to buy the domain, but made up our minds in the last step of the registration just in case we were discovered... god knows how much I wanted to intercept all this lost mail!

    8. Re:Why pay for it now by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      To bribe or cybersquat. Then...profit!

      Though, in this post Dot-Bomb world it would be deamed illigal. I don't think you can register trademarked names such as Microsoft or Pepsi.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    9. Re:Why pay for it now by iantri · · Score: 1
    10. Re:Why pay for it now by flyboy974 · · Score: 1

      I think I still own 8 real shares from options I exercised many years ago at Lycos. At their current stock price, I could use them to buy the domain. To think they were worth about $720 at one point when I had them. Doh!

  4. GRRRR by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 4, Funny

    That means Tripod might not be around anymore. WTF are the phishers supposed to use now?

    *sigh*

    Oh well, there's always geocities...

    --
    bash: rtfm: command not found
    1. Re:GRRRR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Indeed, tough times.

      Who wants to host my www.paypal.com@josh24.tripod.com and www.wellsfargo.com@josh27.tripod.com?

    2. Re:GRRRR by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That means Tripod might not be around anymore. WTF are the phishers supposed to use now?

      Xoom got shut down when General Electric gave up on their failed NBCi project. Angelfire is also a part of Lycos so they'll likely get the same fate as Tripod.

      And then there was one... GeoCities is the last of the "free web hosting" companies left standing as an offshoot of Yahoo!.

    3. Re:GRRRR by Grakun · · Score: 4, Informative

      Xoom got shut down when General Electric gave up on their failed NBCi project. Angelfire is also a part of Lycos so they'll likely get the same fate as Tripod.

      And then there was one... GeoCities is the last of the "free web hosting" companies left standing as an offshoot of Yahoo!


      There are tons of free web hosting companies.

      When searching google for "free web hosting", notice how Xoom.com shows up on the first page. Although now they're "the smarter way to send money".

    4. Re:GRRRR by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Although now they're "the smarter way to send money".

      People oughtta update their links. Most of us know that Google bases result rankings largely on how people link to that site with the relevant keywords (that is why Google Bombing is possible).

      Apparently many sites still link to xoom.com with 'free web hosting' or similar. Just Google www.xoom.com then click the "Find web pages that link to www.xoom.com/" link.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
    5. Re:GRRRR by Bill_Royle · · Score: 2, Funny

      The sooner the free hosts go out of business, the faster Googlebots will crawl.

    6. Re:GRRRR by Bluetrust25 · · Score: 1

      Oh well, there's always geocities...

      Or AloofHosting free web hosting
      - 200MB disk space / 1GB bandwidth
      - 2-line footer text ad, rather than popups or banners.

      May 27th we're switching to link content ads (so we'll take up even less screen real estate) and upgrading our free hosting offering to 250MB disk space / 3GB bandwidth (metered daily.)

      It's an exciting time for us.
      10,000 websites hosted since Christmas.

    7. Re:GRRRR by tarunthegreat · · Score: 0

      Whoa there buddy. Geocities existed as a separate entity fer ages, it was bought by Yahoo in 2000 I think, so it's no offshoot. It's still owned by Yahoo, me thinks.

    8. Re:GRRRR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still have Tripod.co.uk (it's not the same company - it's Lycos Europe owned by a german company)

  5. Downhill from here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Ok so I go there, great a link for adult content, how convenient...to get your company banned from most schools, libraries, and company networks.

    And on top of that, I can't even hit the back button (just keeps you on the front page) in firefox .8

    Is this really the right direction?

    1. Re:Downhill from here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I were you I'd call the doctor and ask to be incarcerated for the fear of extreme moronity. First of all, there's no adult link.

      The link off Lycos leads to an agreement page, where you click Yes or No, then you're moved to a different site.

      And the Back button works fine on Firefox.

    2. Re:Downhill from here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since we're being anal ... I wasn't aware that you called doctors when you wanted to be incarcerated.

    3. Re:Downhill from here? by mphase · · Score: 1

      Incarerated in a mental institution dude. He's not mistaken, you are.

    4. Re:Downhill from here? by JAJ5818_X · · Score: 0

      Wait... Are you saying pr0n is a bad thing? BAN HIM!

    5. Re:Downhill from here? by krymsin01 · · Score: 1

      Although you can check yourself in to a mental institution, at least some people check their selves into treatment.

      --
      stuff
    6. Re:Downhill from here? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      IS it me, or is there no adult link on www.lycos.com? If there is one (I don't count the 'models' link as really adult), could you point out where it is to me?

  6. Put this on eBay by devilspgd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell, I'll give at least $50. It's a bit high for an opening offer given the current lack of reputation, but I think it's fair.

    --
    Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    1. Re:Put this on eBay by TechnologyX · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll see your wager, and I'll raise you a quarter!

      oh you meant 50 dollars

      --
      Slashdot sucks
  7. Awrigght! by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

    A campy, old-school web portal for sale! I hope they accept COD. It'd look great mounted on the wall above my wet bar with all the vintage neon beer signs. Maybe when I can afford it, I'll get an Altavista to put up next to it. That would rock.

    --

    pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    1. Re:Awrigght! by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 2, Funny

      A campy, old-school web portal for sale! I hope they accept COD.

      How about Beenz?

    2. Re:Awrigght! by great+throwdini · · Score: 1
      How about Beenz?

      Sadly lost ... and now (from the site) "Copyright 2004 (c) Car Rentals, Hotel Reservation, Discount Hotels, Airline Ticket, Airfare, Rental Car, Rent a Car , Cruise, Cruises, Vacation Rental Discounts, Rental Cars Online Shopping Mall."

      I guess you can't be accused of keyword spamming search engines if that's the monicker of your firm... or something.

    3. Re:Awrigght! by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about Beenz?

      What about Flooz? I've got an eCard with Whoopi Goldberg's picture on it... how can that have become worthless?

    4. Re:Awrigght! by generationxyu · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least AltaVista has Babel Fish, which just added something like 20 new translators. Lycos has the "image hosted by tripod" thing, and that's about it.

      --
      I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
    5. Re:Awrigght! by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2, Funny

      It would make a great gift for one of the remaining dotcom billionaires to buy for an out of work friend.

      "Happy birthday, buddy. How would you like to move your blog to Lycos.com?"

      -B

    6. Re:Awrigght! by RobertB-DC · · Score: 1

      I've got an eCard with Whoopi Goldberg's picture on it... how can that have become worthless?

      I'll see your Whoopi eCard and raise you an authentic GroceryWorks.com "Punch-A-Bunch" magnet. It's a business-card sized magnet / punch card. No idea what you got when you accumulated 10 punches, though it has a picture of a $100 bill in the 10-spot. I'm also unsure how they were planning to punch a hole in the thing -- it's at least a half-millimeter thick.

      I'll put it on eBay one of these days. Another artifact of the dot-com bust.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  8. Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by aardwolf204 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Horray! Its been 6 hours of reloading slashdot and finally we get a non-linux story.

    Sure, Sun's Java Desktop System was insightful.
    And Fedora Core 2 Test 3 was um, interesting.
    The Linux Desktop Summit 2004 article was informative (wish I got some maple syrup and a t-shirt)
    And the conspiricy theorys in the Turbolinux Licenses Windows Media 9 article were something to wrap my tinfoil hat around

    But thank god, slashdot has returned to normal. A sexy search engine story to wet my apatite. Wait, is it how great Google is for running on Linux?! (/me reads TFA). Ok, were safe. Hopefully in a few hours a fud-filled gmail article will come up, or even better cmdrtaco will post this one again for double the pleasure, double the fun.

    but seriously, about the maple syrup, hook me up.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Change your viewing preferences and quit bitching about it.

    2. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by Tacylm · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Get a life, GEEK

    3. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by cperciva · · Score: 3, Funny

      But thank god, slashdot has returned to normal. A sexy search engine story to wet my apatite.

      Just what you need... some wet calcium fluoride phosphate.

      Just the thing to whet one's appetite.

    4. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      sounds like a song coming on...

      Sure, Sun's Java Desktop System was insightful.
      And Fedora Core 2 Test 3 was delightful.
      But there's no more Linux to show...
      Google IPO, IPO, IPO!

    5. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke. Laugh.

    6. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot should be 90% about Linux and OSS. Forget all the "me-too" business/MIS kids here.

    7. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by g0rath · · Score: 0

      ...unless you take in to count a very large Linux installation that runs Matchmaker.com and has been running since the Linux conversion in 1999....

    8. Re:Horray: First non-linux story in 6 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As an added bonus, check out the origin of the word "apatite" on your dictionary.com link -- "[From Greek apat, deceit (from its often being mistaken for other minerals).]"

      Guess it sure decieved him.

  9. Playboy by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lycos is currently re-inventing itself as a portal for the new generation with the link to Playboy affiliate placed right on the front page (click on "Adults 18+ only").

    While I'm familiar with many a washed-out pop musician turning to Playboy to boost an aching career, I'd never imagine this trend to extend to websites...

    1. Re:Playboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no washed-out pop musician, but I've turned to Playboy to boost an aching something alright!

    2. Re:Playboy by strike2867 · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking Cowboyneal too?

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  10. Largest domain selling amount? by PurifyTheMind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I read once that business.com got the largest amount of money for being sold at something like eight million US dollars. If lycos.com came anywhere close to the 200,000,000 mark, that would be some kind of crazy record.

    1. Re:Largest domain selling amount? by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This won't exactly count as a pure-domain transaction because there's actually some remnants of a company attached to the domain name.

    2. Re:Largest domain selling amount? by dmehus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No. Terra Networks wants to sell its entire Lycos, Inc. subsidiary for approximately $200 million -- not just the domain name.

      Lycos, Inc. includes: Angelfire, HTML Gear, Lycos Mail, Matchmaker, Quote.com, Raging Bull, Sonique, Tripod, Webmonkey/Hotwired, and Wired News. It also has partnerships to create several co-branded Web sites. So, there are very valuable assets here.

      My prediction: Ask Jeeves is likely thinking very heavily about acquiring Lycos to expand its distribution further. (It recently acquired Interactive Search Holdings for $343 million in cash and stock. ISH assets include Excite, iWon, My Search, and My Way, to name a few.) The more distribution Ask Jeeves has, the more money it can demand from Google -- which accounts for 70% of Ask Jeeves revenue. It currently takes 80 cents on the dollar, with Google taking 20 cents. With the purchase of ISH, Jeeves can probably demand 85. With Lycos too, it could quite easily get 90 cents. So, financially and strategically, Lycos would make sense for Jeeves.

      Other possible candidates who might be interested in Lycos include InfoSpace, Primedia subsidiary About, Inc., or possibly even Google itself.

      Lycos won't die -- it'll just change hands and be restructured. I guarantee it.

      Cheers,
      Doug

    3. Re:Largest domain selling amount? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      What I see Terra doing is lumping all these things together as "Lycos" (when it's nothing of the sort, but a bunch of independent offerings with little in common for the most part). They sell the shitty, unprofitable offerings (Lycos Mail? just guessing, what with all the spam) in with the offerings that actually have some redeemable value, and thus the purchaser ends up paying a lot for the services they want to buy, and then dump 2/3rds of what they purchase because they're worthless.

      Same basic thing that commercial sales folks do with damned near everything. "Free toy with meal!", etc.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  11. What else can you do with a failed site? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Got a failed domain that still has a few hundred thousand people a day typing it in forgetting that you bit the dust long ago? Turn it into a porn site and get some cash out of those otherwise useless hits... I can't even count the number of gone-under sites that have pulled that stunt.

    1. Re:What else can you do with a failed site? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely.

      I can't even recall half of them anymore. There's just too many. It seems that there's more porn online now than anything else, let alone "ever before". Between p2p, broadband, and all the other 'traditional' means for aquiring the stuff, it's everywhere.

      Now, being someone that isn't a terribly big fan of the stuff (it's goofy), and being a fairly big fan of the material that was there beforehand (educational, interesting things, largely), I'm a bit disappointed. All the good stuff is getting crouded out by stuff that is decidedly lower brow. There just doesn't seen to be much of the "free culture" left from what the Internet was originally. Sure, there's a slew of IT-related stuff - slashdot, sf.net, freshmeat, tldp, et al - but what about traditional sciences? They're getting crouded out.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  12. "Adults 18+ only" by next1 · · Score: 1

    anyone else not get that link?

    must be some geographical based stuff going on.

    1. Re:"Adults 18+ only" by badansible · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Go back to school kid. It says clearly 18+ only, won't work for you. ;-)

  13. Lycos was awesome by xintegerx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I only know the company only by their English web site - Lycos.com, having never spoken Spanish ever as far as I can remember.

    Lycos was very important to the world.

    They had:

    1) A web search engine. Who else had a web search engine besides Yahoo and AltaVista?

    2) A web hosting service. Who else had a web hosting service besides GeoCities and AngelFire?

    3) An e-mail service. Who else had an e-mail service besides Yahoo and Hotmail?

    4) Web games. Who else had web games besides Yahoo and MPlayer?

    5) News stories. Wait, no they didn't. I know Yahoo had those.

    All of the above was sarcastic.

    As you can see, in all five important areas, Lycos was not in the top of each one. Sure, you knew they had each of those, but they weren't leaders at all in ANYTHING. Their idea seemed to be to JUST EXIST and the millions of people on the Internet couldn't just all flock to Yahoo or AltaVista, right? There would always be room for Lycos, right? Even without R&D? A portion of the Internet would use Lycos regardless of competition, and as Internet use grows, Lycos would grow in popularity, right?

    Uh, no. They thought, if there are 5 stores in a mall and they are one of them, passerbys, who were in the mall for one of the other stores, many of htem would still visit Lycos, right? Or at least look in. Makes a lot of sense.

    However, the Internet is not like that. You could place a store next door to a competitor and steal his visitors. You can place a phonebook ad and steal your competitors visitors as their clients check the phonebook for your competitor's phone number but see your ad next to it. With the internet, an analogy is links connecting the dots. HOWEVER, the problem is, THERE ARE NO LINKS TO COMPETITORS. In other words, if you visit one guy's site, HE WILL NOT HAVE ANY LINKS POINTING TO HIS COMPETITOR'S SITE. Furthermore, all links will be designed to keep you INSIDE HIS OWN SITE. Therefore, actually LIMITING your awareness of other sites.

    So, Lycos thought (apparently by their lack of R & D) that they would just advertise and exist and as people flock to Yahoo and Google, they would get a share. Uh.. NO?

    The one major remaining portal is Yahoo. They are still leaders in e-mail, games, bought GeoCities, searching, and they had news on their site as long as I can remember. All of Yahoo!'s competitors just 'existed'. Just like hundreds of businesses 'exist' but nobody cares about them. Yahoo made you involved in their life. Yahoo is still kicking, having bought Overture, GeoCities, WebRing, Inktomi, HotJobs: God knows what else.

    Even now, with Google doing what they do, Yahoo! is still the overall winner and success story.

    1. Re:Lycos was awesome by OldMiner · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm going to be short on details because I'm a tad tired right now. But Lycos had a decent media search, back in the day. I clearly recall using it to find MIDIs because it kindly listed the sizes of the media with a link directly to the MIDI file. As such, it was normally pretty easy to pick out all of the different versions of a song there were out there. This was back when the advanced/media search was at lycospro.lycos.com, IIRC.

      Not having had a very impressive machine at the time, I can't state whether it was a decent enough MP3 search engine. Listening to them using whatever version of WinAmp existed at that time pretty much locked the machine to all other uses. But this did predate Napster, and people had to get their MP3s somehow.

      --
      You like splinters in your crotch? -Jon Caldara
    2. Re:Lycos was awesome by AzureLunatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now, they've got "helpful" tools that try to install themselves without asking, and Wired News.

      When their obnoxious little programs ended up on my box for the second time (despite countermeasures) I decided that Wired News wasn't worth dealing with the aftermath of visiting.

    3. Re:Lycos was awesome by necro2607 · · Score: 0

      I was about to ask, "ever used Yahoo?"...

    4. Re:Lycos was awesome by jesterzog · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh, no. They thought, if there are 5 stores in a mall and they are one of them, passerbys, who were in the mall for one of the other stores, many of htem would still visit Lycos, right? Or at least look in. Makes a lot of sense.

      I find this analogy quite interesting. It's similar in a way to one of the interesting things that General Motors apparently does, which I hadn't realised until someone pointed it out to me. Presumably it works for General Motors, though.

      The theory is that if there are five brands of car on the market, then people who are shopping for a new car will pick one of those five, based on which one they prefer out of the available choices. If there are fifteen brands of car on the market, people will do the same. They have more choice, of course.

      On the other hand, if ten of those brands happen to be owned by General Motors, then the chances are much higher that someone will choose a General Motors brand. It might not be completely even -- they might only get half of the custom instead of two thirds of it -- but the illusion of extra choice will prevent people from realising that a lot of those options are actually very similar to each other.

      It's not entirely comparable, but the strategy seems to imply that sometimes just being there may be enough to get a significant amount of attention. As long as you're good enough to be considered. (That said, I agree that it clearly didn't work for Lycos.)

    5. Re:Lycos was awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember in 1994 sitting at the computer lab..
      "Hey, Have you seen, Lycos got 20.000 webpages indexed now!"
      "Really? cool!"

      then it increased to a whopping 50.000 and 100.000....man, those were the days....
      I loved it when every second web page you visited had a link to someone that you knew, the web was so small back then!

    6. Re:Lycos was awesome by rynoski · · Score: 1

      AngelFire. isn't that owned by lycos?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: 1) those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.
    7. Re:Lycos was awesome by g0rath · · Score: 0

      So, Lycos thought (apparently by their lack of R & D) that they would just advertise and exist and as people flock to Yahoo and Google...

      Uh not really. They had a great R&D team, as a former employee, the issue that I saw was that the night school harvard mba's didn't think technology would be important. So many great ideas thought up there took to long to get through the ROI meetings that the competitors beat them to the punch every time.

      I remember being in a design meeting and suggesting that IM would be an extremly good thing. They didn't move on it until three years later, and by then it was too late

    8. Re:Lycos was awesome by upside · · Score: 1

      Back during my first year in Uni ('95-'96) Lycos was _the_ search site and Yahoo was _the_ directory portal.

      I ditched Lycos the following summer when a friend introduced me to Altavista. I used Altavista (altavista.digital.com back then) for searching for three years. I started using Google in '99. That's about when I stopped using Yahoo, too.

      --
      I'm sorry if I haven't offended anyone
    9. Re:Lycos was awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) An e-mail service. Who else had an e-mail service besides Yahoo and Hotmail?

      I would just like to say that before Lycos aquired it, MailCity was much better than Hotmail. Like with so many other things in the dot com era, after the aquisition the once great service rapidly went downhill. Lycos and CNet both permanently earned my hatred by ruining great services, so I can't say I'm sad to see Lycos is suffering.

  14. Where aren't they now... by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a quick field guide to some of the other pre-Google search engines...

    AltaVista: Since it was born as Digital Equipment Corp.'s reasearch project rather than an attempt to make money, Compaq didn't exactly know what they had aquired. AltaVista suffered from an outdated ranking system and stale crawl data as it got passed from investment group to investment group. They ended up as a small fish in the Yahoo food chain at the end.

    Excite: After merging with original cable-modem ISP @home, it all went down hill. An unprofitable website merged with a cable modem ISP who hadn't quite yet figured out that throtling user's bandwidth is a requirement to stay alive. In the end, they ended up selling a service for a price than less than it cost... and into the dot-bomb recycle bin they went. The Excite.com site is still up, but it's really just a less ad-intrusive version of iWon, and shares a lot in common with MyWay.com who is also from the same people. iWon, is of course known as a spreader of semi-spyware.

    Inktomi/"HotBot": Inktomi got bought up by Yahoo!, and now powers the web results once again after being deposed by Google for a time.
    HotBot.com was always just a licensee of Inktomi's data. It started as a spinoff to Wired Magazine, and ended up getting included in the sale of Wired News to Lycos. It's still ticking now as a unified interface for three of the web crawlers left standing... Inktomi, Google, and Ask Jeeves. They most likely will be part of this spinoff of what's left of Lycos.

    Infoseek: Infoseek sold out at the height of the market to the mouse ears. Disney had the bright idea of uniting all of their web content under the Go.com brand, which also would allow all of the Disney-owned sites to share Go.com cookies so that a registered user's cookie from abc.go.com could also be read by espn.go.com. Infoseek would become the search engine portal that'd power the www.go.com portal at the center of the Go Network. A few years later, Disney realized their mistake. Nobody cared about the search engine portal... so they gutted the Go Network brand and turned www.go.com into nothing but a bare-bones portal with a Google-powered search. Inktomi as a search engine is no more. However, they did keep go.com domain in use in order to keep that cookie-sharing going.

    GoTo.com: They were never really a search engine, they just licensed Inktomi's results. However, they invented the pay-per-click-search-placement model years before Google came on the scene. When Disney launched the Go Network, they sued saying that the Disney logo and branding was too close to their own, and won forcing the Go Network to change its logo. Shortly after that, they changed their name to Overture and got out of the direct search portal business. They've since been snapped up by Yahoo. Overture technically owns AltaVista just to show where they are in the pecking order over there.

    1. Re:Where aren't they now... by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      in order to keep that cookie-sharing going

      Is that why CNet is using that *.com.com thing?

    2. Re:Where aren't they now... by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is that why CNet is using that *.com.com thing?

      Yep. Same concept... it's easier to share cookies when all the sites are subdomains of the same actual domain name. CNET's idea of buying up cool-sounding domain names like news.com and radio.com seems to have totally backfired...

    3. Re:Where aren't they now... by prostoalex · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, launching news.com.com and not owning news.com could've landed them in legal trouble.

    4. Re:Where aren't they now... by dmehus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Verity, Inc. bought the enterprise Web search assets of Inktomi and Infoseek and is commonly used as the enterprise search appliance of choice at many large corporations. It renamed the product Verity Ultraseek.

      Excite is now owned by Interactive Search Holdings, along with iWon and My Way. ISH is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Ask Jeeves, which Jeeves paid $343 million for in March.

      Cheers,
      Doug

    5. Re:Where aren't they now... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      That's not even close to a complete list. What about dogpile and mamma?

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    6. Re:Where aren't they now... by NXprime · · Score: 1

      Wait wait wait a sec, hold on here. Are you implying that MyWay is a semi-spyware website?!!!! How?!!!!! They read emails or something? Dammit this is my main homepage & email for the last 2 years. I gotta know what's going on here. :(

    7. Re:Where aren't they now... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      MyWay isn't a semi-spyware site itself, it just since day one shared an ownership connection to iWon who puts out downloadable applications like its IM client and "prize machine" game that generate pop-up ads.

      In short, MyWay, Excite, and iWon all have the same base of content. It's just that...

      - iWon bribes users with all sorts of contest entries. Of course, they get the money to run those contests by being one of the most ad-filled sites on the Internet.
      - Excite cashes in on the memory of the original Excite brand. It has about the typical level of ads on the Internet.
      - MyWay means it when they say "No Popups. No Banners. No Kidding." Their site is refreshingly Google-like with little ad content. This brand makes its money honestly and quietly with things like Google ads.

      So MyWay isn't really pushing spyware onto you... but be careful if you stray into their iWon sister site.

    8. Re:Where aren't they now... by OneFix+at+Work · · Score: 1

      Yea, but what about OpenText... search.opentext.com used to give a stale, but workable search engine. The company has now since begun to sell their search engine to companies.

      I found opentext's search results very relevant at the time...this may have changed with time, but it was still a good search engine...

      Archive.org still has the old front page...

  15. Microsoft by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My bet is that Microsoft will buy it. They have to do something with all that cash, and they want a search engine and more (redirected) traffic for MSN, which they are having trouble growing. If you cannot earn eyeballs, buy 'em.

    1. Re:Microsoft by dmehus · · Score: 1

      My bet is on Ask Jeeves. They're profitable and have sustained positive cash flow. Lycos makes sense for Jeeves.

      If not Jeeves, I'll bet either InfoSpace or Primedia subsidiary About, Inc.

      Cheers,
      Doug

    2. Re:Microsoft by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hrmmmmm I doubt it. not with that "18+ only" on their front page. MS is too conservative and mainstream for that - they'd get a huge "exploitation" hit from feminists, conservatives, and what have you. Granted ,they could change that, but we'll see.

      As a search technology, lycos offers little. As a portal, even less (as MS likely already gets thousands of hits at their home page).

      I imagine that MS's search engine attempts might start off as licensing Google's technology and 'enhancing' it. The enhancement would be, I suspect, something along the lines of the slashdot 'section' boxes that you can add to your site.

      Want an RSS feed? search.microsoft.com would have it... I suspect they'd have an RSS for damned near anything you'd want, with a minimalistic/google-like initial setup.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    3. Re:Microsoft by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. not with that "18+ only" on their front page. MS is too conservative and mainstream...

      But that can be split up and sold off seperately.

  16. Google Cache by brucmack · · Score: 4, Informative

    Google cache of lycos.com.

    The "reinvention" mentioned in the original posting seems to only apply to the US site, and other countries appear to be automatically redirected. So here's the link for anyone who can't see the site.

    The sites are completely different, it isn't just the adults 18+ link.

    1. Re:Google Cache by statusbar · · Score: 1

      How come for me in the top right corner of the 'new' lycos page it lists the top 10 searches as being:

      The Lycos 50Most Searched Bush

      George W. Bush
      Barney Bush
      Sophia Bush
      Jeb Bush
      Laura Bush
      Kate Bush
      Barbara Bush
      Jenna Bush
      George H.W Bush
      Millie Bush

      HUH? How could that be true??? or are peopl just searching for 'Bush' expecting pr0n?

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    2. Re:Google Cache by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      The Lycos 50 Most Searched Bush

      This is the list of the top 10 search strings that include "bush". When I looked at the front page they had a list of the top 10 "muppets" search. Obviously, they are listing random terms.

      -Brent
    3. Re:Google Cache by List+of+FAILURES · · Score: 1

      Slashdot's biggest Bush fanboi comes to the aid of his fair maiden once again.

      Thanks to the fact that Brent has barred me from posting in his JEs, I've taken it upon myself to follow him to public comments and present a link in my SIG to my commentary on his lies and deceit. Yes, this is off-topic and I don't mind getting modded down. Anything to present some truth as an antidote to Brent's lies. You asked for it Brent, and now you've got it.

  17. For Canadians by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For any Canadians out there, the only way I can figure out to view the lycos.com page is through the Google cache. It seems that you get redirected to lycos.ca otherwise.

    --
    www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
  18. Smart Move by Sardak · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Lycos is currently re-inventing itself as a portal for the new generation with the link to Playboy affiliate placed right on the front page (click on "Adults 18+ only").

    They've obviously realized like so many others that porn is the real gold mine of the internet.

  19. http://models.lycos.com by flyingace · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope this is not the end of http://models.lycos.com/

    1. Re:http://models.lycos.com by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's always Page 3 ..

    2. Re:http://models.lycos.com by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      I prefer free6.

    3. Re:http://models.lycos.com by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      I was replacing one "ooh look...a nipple" site with another, rather than trying to wean models.lycos.com users onto hardcore :o)

  20. Caffeninated soap on the front page of Lycos? by rolocroz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Did anyone else get the ad for Shower Shock caffeinated soap on the Lycos front page? It leads to a link to a search for it, which then leads to ThinkGeek. Odd.

    --

    I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

    1. Re:Caffeninated soap on the front page of Lycos? by benna · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

      Huh?

      --
      "It is not how things are in the world that is mystical, but that it exists." -Ludwig Wittgenstein
    2. Re:Caffeninated soap on the front page of Lycos? by sahrss · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I meta-mod all positive moderation Unfair, because it's abuse of the system.

      Ha, I like that! A spin on the sigs that say "I metamod all negative moderation Unfair because I want everyone to have to read 70 comments at a threshold of 5!"

      :P

  21. I wonder how many 5 year olds are browsing porn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks Carnegie Mellon! Near direct links to pr0n from a website that you pretty much claim is yours. What the hell are you people thinking?

    Lycos® is a registered trademark of Carnegie Mellon University.

  22. Darl should snap it up by Magickcat · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe SCO should buy it. Both companies have a similar client base and future.

    None whatsoever.

    --

    Si tacuisses philosophus mansisses. If you had kept quiet, you would have remained a philosopher.

  23. Re:I wonder how many 5 year olds are browsing porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, CMU is a rathole.

    GO STANFORD

    Our boys would never pull shit like that.

  24. Clever Ploy by FrankDrebin · · Score: 4, Funny

    1. Put lame website up for sale.
    2. Place story on Slashdot.
    3. Show buyers the wicked hit counts.
    4. Profit!
    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  25. Check those numbers, please by Baumi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The market scorecard shows it exactly... $200 billion going in, $12.5 billion going out. They misplaced 15/16th of the value that they started with.

    It's $12.5 billion going in, $200 million going out. Which means they've wasted more than 59/60th of the value.

    As an aside: I don' think there ever was a $200 billion Dot-Com-Merger, was there? (How much was AOL-TimeWarner again?)

    Jens

    1. Re:Check those numbers, please by the+sabster · · Score: 4, Informative

      The AOL-TW merger was proposed at $124 Billion.

      It ended up going through at either $106 or $109 Billion.

    2. Re:Check those numbers, please by Phekko · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's $12.5 billion going in, $200 million going out. Which means they've wasted more than 59/60th of the value.

      What value is that, exactly? I just checked, and the price for www.lyyyycos.com would be $200 for 10 years (pricecheck done here, there are lots of others) so the way I see it, they haven't wasted value. They have started with a hugely inflated value which is now gradually nearing the boundaries of the real world (if there, indeed, is such a thing)

      --

      Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
    3. Re:Check those numbers, please by Baumi · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's right - poor wording on my part. They didn't diminsh the value - they just wasted money in the first place by buying Lycos for way too much.

      I remember wondering about that amount even back then: I mean, in 2000, Lycos was on its way down already. Perhaps it was different in the US, but over here, people were using Yahoo or Altavista, nobody I knew used for searching or news. (And yes, there is a German Lycos site.)

      Interesting aside: Some time ago, Lycos launched a huge media campaign to regain popularity - apparently without much success. Google OTOH managed to become the most popular search engine mainly by woord of mouth. (I know Lycos is a portal, but their ad campaign - the one with the dog - focused on the searching part of things.)

  26. Lycos... by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lycos is the eighth largest web portal, with over three hundred subscribers. Their site features time and weather, email, search, an "About Us" page and a Terms of Service page.

    Definitely a bargain at $200 million.

    Maybe someone could turn it into a sort of "living museum" so future generations can experience an actual late 20th century web portal. Little footnotes* indicating areas of historical interest could be added.

    *Like this one. Footnotes are used to convey additional information without interrupting the flow of the text.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Lycos... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an "About Us" page and a Terms of Service page.

      Wow, just those two should fetch at least 50 mil.

    2. Re:Lycos... by lavaface · · Score: 1
      with over three hundred subscribers

      sounds like a real deal ; )

    3. Re:Lycos... by Afty0r · · Score: 1
      Lycos is the eighth largest web portal, with over three hundred subscribers. Their site features time and weather, email, search, an "About Us" page and a Terms of Service page.
      Definitely a bargain at $200 million.

      You know what? Someone said that a few years back - "Y'know, Lycos is definitely a bargain at $12.5 BILLION".
      The truth is, it's not a bargain at $200 unless it's making $14 million a year clear profit bare minimum. AFAIK it's making a rather hefty loss at the moment.
      The only way it's a bargain is if the current management are not properly exploiting its' assets, but the truth is it has almost no assets, as so many earlier posters pointed out, they have had basically no R&D for several years...
  27. Uh, k. by jcuervo · · Score: 5, Funny
    Fun Search:
    The Lycos 50 Muppet Characters

    1. Elmo
    2. Kermit the Frog
    3. Cookie Monster
    4. Big Bird
    5. Grover

    6. Gonzo
    7. Miss Piggy
    8. Ernie
    9. Oscar the Grouch
    10. Bert
    Unless the hardcore pr0n is Bert and Ernie in a three-way with Miss Piggy...
    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    1. Re:Uh, k. by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered about Bert's affinity for pigeons, though...

      Seriously, though, there was a hilarious little joke thrown in a sketch I saw recently (I've got 3 toddlers in the house, so Sesame Street is real big around here), that might be appropriate here.

      Bert walks into the room and sees Ernie talking into a banana like it was a telephone. Bert's like, "what are you doing?", and Ernie explains that he's pretending to talk Gladys the Elephant on the banana. He cajoles Bert into trying a turn ("I'm just not emotionally secure enough for this", complains Bert), whereupon Bert awkwardly starts up a conversation of his own with Gladys. Eventually he gets into it ("hey, this is pretty kinky", he says), and the conversation starts rolling.

      The kicker is that their real phone rings, and Ernie answers, saying that no, Bert can't come to the phone because he's talking to an elephant on a banana. In the background, though, you can hear Bert saying "oh, me? Six foot four, blonde hair... no, I don't think we should meet..."

      My wife and I just about fell off the couch we were laughing so hard!

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  28. Partying like it's 1999 by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess the beancounters over at Lycos are still partying like it's 1999.

    Can someone go over and tell them about the dot-com bust please?

    $200m indeed -- bah!

    1. Re:Partying like it's 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or more like they're partying like it's on
      sale for $19.99

  29. Correction? by jcuervo · · Score: 1
    Inktomi as a search engine is no more. However, they did keep go.com domain in use in order to keep that cookie-sharing going.
    IAMANAL: I believe you meant to say "Infoseek" there.
    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  30. where are they now? by circletimessquare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    anyone know what the story is with northernlight.com?

    looking at their home page now, it looks like they went corporate/ enterprise search

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:where are they now? by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

      Ah, that rings a bell!

      They did indeed stop providing general web search a few years back. I remembered going there once when they announced it.

    2. Re:where are they now? by Retired+Replicant · · Score: 1

      They got out of the consumer "portal" business at the time that Altavista, MSN, Yahoo and Excite were running $100 million ad campaigns to try and capture the "portal" business. They didn't have the ad budget to compete with those guys, and their search function wasn't as clean and easy to use as Google.

  31. Say that again? by Pranjal · · Score: 1

    Google is Ask Jeeves customer? *scratches head*

    1. Re:Say that again? by dmehus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ask Jeeves distributes paid advertising (both in search results and contextually targeted ads on content pages) from the Google AdWords program. Ask Jeeves takes 80 cents per click on a text ad from the AdWords program, with Google taking a 20 cent cut.

      Hope this helps,
      Doug

    2. Re:Say that again? by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

      here, google just uses ask jeeves for that. :p

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Say that again? by bigdavex · · Score: 1

      Ask Jeeves takes 80 cents per click on a text ad from the AdWords program, with Google taking a 20 cent cut.

      If I'm not mistaken, google works on a bidding system so the charge depends on the word.
      --
      -Dave
    4. Re:Say that again? by dmehus · · Score: 1

      Yes, it does and percent should've been the correct word -- not cent. Sorry.

      80% for ads clicked on an Ask Jeeves Web property, with 20% going to Google.

      Cheers,
      Doug

  32. Re:Playboy... and timing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course a lot of washed-out pop musicians appear in Playboy... about the time their careers go, they've just turned 18!

  33. Yeah right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    but there's absoultely no synergy to be found in merging a group of English-langauge sites with Spanish-language sites. You can't share content accross the langages unless you have a ton of people doing translations.

    You must not live anywhere in the southern half of the US where everything is in both English and Spanish.

    Speak English or Die!

  34. 18+ White Noise by DakotaSandstone · · Score: 4, Funny
    Pr0n is the background noise of the Internet. Where there is no signal, there is pr0n. Radio has static, we have pr0n.

    If this is true, what does this mean for lycos.com?

    --
    Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.
  35. Special News Report by NIN1385 · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news this evening, the Lycos dog was killed when someone typed in the words "1986 Chevrolet Caprice Front Bumper" into the search field and hit the "Go Get It" button. Services will be held at the fire hydrant outside of Arlington National Cemetary at noon.

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  36. I'm sold! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    All those smiling people can't be wrong!

  37. Lycos re-invention by Vexware · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I do not know if only I feel this way about the look of the new Lycos website design, but do you not think it looks somewhat cheap and unprofessional, in the style of "search engines" which are in fact just advertisement whores appearing in various pastly infamous domains? The front page looks hideous as the preponderant yellow does not look nice at all. As for the links of 'top searches', it could be "helpful", but at the same time, what that section mostly does is clutter up my screen with links I mostly do not care about. The links to Lycos' other services are existant albeit the general layout and design makes the page look amateurish and cheap.

    The search results page is not too bad, and the news search results page bearing the same design, then that aspect is alright in a sufficient way; but the image search results page definitly loses out to Google 's in my opinion -- the system warned me that the files I was about to view contain adult material, when in fact they didn't, and the search results' layout itself was idiotic. As for the shopping section, I believe Google's Froogle does a good stab at this section, and even more impressively so since it is more recent than Lycos'. I also forget to mention the ridiculous web hosting service, which is just truly unsatisfying in terms of space and service itself.

    All in all, I think Lycos is just relying on its reputation now, just as MSN Search is relying on users utilizing Internet Explorer's search function. The problem is, it is already beaten by far by Yahoo! and probably Google will progressively transform into a web portal itself, albeit a much less cluttered one than the currently existing platforms. If you ask me, Lycos' death will not be anytime soon though, because there are still thousands of people relying on its services for now; still, it is just a matter of time I would say.

    --
    "Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect" -- Linus Torval
  38. Lycos... by Good+Sumerian · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come get some.

  39. Id like to buy Lycos... by kerb · · Score: 1

    for $14, an Xbox and Free voucher for MSCE :)

  40. Why are the FOnts All MEssed up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or are all the fonts all messed up on the Lycos home page?

  41. explains the spam then by martin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    from lycos.com. All I get is junk advertising services etc.

    Sigh what a sad world - the only that's known to make money is pr0n....

  42. December 1994 by danny · · Score: 1
    I can still remember the huge spike in traffic to my web site in December 1994, after Lycos indexed my web site (then hosted at my university). Altavista came along nearly a year later, but Lycos was the first full-text web search engine (that I noticed, anyway).

    Danny.

    --
    I have written over 900 book reviews
  43. Bad CEO speak... by evilviper · · Score: 1
    re-inventing itself as a portal

    That's what all link-farms say...
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  44. 18+ by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm the least prudish of anyone I know, my first graduate paycheck may well be spent on a terabyte SCSI array for my porn collection.

    However, 2 links from the lycos home-page are naked boobs, and 3 links away are 5meg hardcore porn clips. I think this is a bit much. If I want to see "Hot Moms" getting banged I'm quite capable of finding them myself using Google. This involves an active step on my part.

    Is it just me, or is this a bad thing?

    1. Re:18+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lycos.de hosts free porn. Click on "Erotik"

  45. stupid design by Maznafein · · Score: 1

    Wow, I haven't been to lycos in *years* and I do mean *years.* Their new lay out is horribly slow and ugly. Why must people do things like that when it's obvious that Google's way of having a front page (and anything else for that matter) is small, slick and effecient. Remember, less is more.

    --
    <happiness>beer</happiness>
  46. Does lycos change its home page over time by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 1

    or location of the browser, maybe? 'cause I don't see an adult link on the home page.

  47. Is it just me? by NetNinja · · Score: 1

    Or did it seem every time my Windows machine was browser hijacked the default page was pointing to Lycos? Or the Trojans that infected my machine would pop up Lycos adds?

    Lycos is a Trojan.

    1. Re:Is it just me? by nmjon · · Score: 1

      Lycos sidesearch is a nasty little parasite homepage hijacker. I would love to see them go out of business. I can only wish all of them suffer horribly for thier sins.

  48. Reminds me of Infoseek by crimson30 · · Score: 1

    It used to be one of the premier search engines until Disney bought and ruined it.

    Why do these companied do this sort of stuff? What are they thinking?

  49. Remember those old Lycos ads... by abernathy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Imperious nerd: Lycos!

    Big dog: Wwwooof!

    Imperious nerd: Fetch me a business model!

    Big dog: Wwwooof! [Whooshing noise as faithful LYCOS rushes off into the jungles of cyberspace (oooooh!) to fetch his master a business model.]

    [Dead air]

    Imperious nerd: Lycos? LYCOS?

  50. What About Webmonkey? by bgumm · · Score: 1

    I actually used Webmonkey back in the day when I started doing web design. I think they stil have good stuff on their site... Will it disappear as well?

    --
    honnold.org - sometimes-rock band, all the time awesome forum
  51. hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Buy Lycos... party like it's 1999.

  52. I wonder if ... by DikSeaCup · · Score: 1
    Because it identified me as being in Florida, particularly a particular zip code, that it magically removed the 18+ link from it's site.

    Guess I'm not allowed to surf through Lycos for porn. Oh me oh my, whatever will I do?

    Oh yeah, I can type the URL in directly.

  53. What does "bukkake" mean? by benzapp · · Score: 1

    I really have no idea and have not heard the term before. Thanks!

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
    1. Re:What does "bukkake" mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an odd fetish.. well I think a bit odd, where like 100 guys gather around some asian girl and all shoot their loads of hot white fake sperm on her face.

    2. Re:What does "bukkake" mean? by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      It's not fake. That jizz is real. Get on kazaa and download a bukkake clip and see for yourself.

      Bukkake also usually has Japanese actors in it. If the actors are not Japanese, the clip is usually desribed as "American" bukkake.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  54. Re:What else can you do with a failed state? by benzapp · · Score: 1

    This is unfortunately a major problem in the world.

    All things ultimately cater to base forms of humanity when they cater to the majority.

    The majority of humans care only about satisfying their primal appetites and nothing more.

    The only question is, with the spectacular failure of the internet for the reasons you mention, how do we still have people who champion democracy and egalitarianism?

    You would think geeks everywhere would realize the masses should not be allowed on the internet, let alone be allowed to have a say in government and ultimately the future direction of humanity itself.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  55. Re:Portals? by the+MaD+HuNGaRIaN · · Score: 0

    C'mon! -2!!! You guys are killing me. It's funny. Laugh!

    I learned my lesson...no more "Soviet Russia" jokes, I promise. Now quite modding me to death. My karma will never recover. That's what I get for drinking too many Vodka martini's yesterday!

  56. Kinda, but no by BayBlade · · Score: 1
    The marketing model you've described is referred to as "multibranding."

    Let me ramble please. Essentially, the idea is a company releases a number of "competing brands" in order to increase the number of brands in the market, thereby offering consumers alternatives to brands the company already owns. Good examples of this are Soap (Lever Bros vs. Colgate-Palmolive) and, to a lesser extent, Soft drinks (Coca-Cola vs PspsiCo -- there's some similarity between the drinks and automobiles, the drink companies create new brands to compete with themselves and their aquisitions, which the automobile companies generally don't).

    Automobiles are slightly different beast however, because most of the car companies that fall under a parent's umbrella were simply aquired and not created as a new brand to compete with themselves (a notable and unique exception to this rule being Saturn).

    It works better for GM to buy Pontiac, Buick, Chevrolet, Cadillac and Saab because it not only adds a new brand for them (which does does happen, but isn't the the company's true motive), it also removes a market competetor, and moves someone else's innovations into the company. Over time, the aquired companies get integrated as divisions (which is why at first we saw Dodge, Plymoth and Chrysler all their own flavour of Neon, but recently only Dodge makes them).

    Eventually, once whatever the aquisition offers the company aside from the brand, has been absorbed, the aquisition gets renamed and later closed or simply closed.

    --

    The key difference between a Programmer and a Senior Programmer is that one of them is Mexican.