Slashdot Mirror


Do You Really Want to Meet People on the Web?

Wolfspelz writes "Do you want to meet people on Web pages? The Jabber Virtual Presence project makes people aware of each other on the Web. Just like you are aware of other people in the real world anywhere you go, the virtual presence makes you aware of others on the same virtual locations. The project uses Jabber/XMPP as the transport protocol for virtual presence. Jabber conference components serve as presence servers. The code is GPL/LGPL. The Virtual Presence Protocol extensions are open and documented. The virtual presence system including the LLuna2 client is designed to protect the privacy and prohibit any indecent use, be it commercial use, advertising, or profiling. But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?"

256 comments

  1. I don't think so by ralf1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't want to meet people who need the web to meet people.

    --
    "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
    1. Re:I don't think so by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

      You obviously have not seen many webpages of those lonely 18 year old cheerleaders desperately looking to meet someone.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:I don't think so by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not? It is just another medium to meet people. In fact it can sometimes be better. You might get to know the person, and like the person so that you would want to meet the person. This does not have to be for romance, but could be for friends. Back in the day when local BBS' were big - we would have get-to-gethers. I never did it to try and go out with a girl, but it was nice to meet the people I would play MUD's with. I have met a number of people from the web. Some nice, some not so nice. Some extremely hot, some extremely not :) I think it is a new medium - nothing wrong with it. People use newspaper ads, bars, clubs, parks, restaurants. Others may not have the time (i have been in this position) to go and hang out at these places all the time.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    3. Re:I don't think so by xmas2003 · · Score: 4, Funny

      HEY ... better to meet people on the web that say, on the road - how would you like to meet this guy who got caught Nose Picken' on Photo Radar ;-)

      --
      Hulk SMASH Celiac Disease
    4. Re:I don't think so by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      On the other hand:

      But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?"

      could easily be rendered as:

      But: do you want to meet people at all?"

      For a lot of people, this involves some sort of a negative answer, one way or another. Some folks have a low tolerance of human beings, depending on circumstances.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    5. Re:I don't think so by sosegumu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't want to meet people who need the web to meet people.

      What!!! Just think of all those hot girlz waiting to be invited back to our mothers' basements to see our newest modded gaming pc!

      --
      It's easier to wear the spandex than to do the crunches. --David Lee Roth
    6. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      People use newspaper ads, bars, clubs, parks, restaurants.

      Don't forget toilet walls. I prefer toilet walls.

    7. Re:I don't think so by naden · · Score: 1

      Well maybe I want to meet the people who want to meet people who need the web to meet people.

      Those sound like some good people.

      --
      Funtage Factor: Purple
    8. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? It is just another medium to meet people. In fact it can sometimes be better. You might get to know the person, and like the person so that you would want to meet the person.

      Yeah - but they always run away screaming when they find out I'm 40-something and male. Man, kids these days...

    9. Re:I don't think so by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 0

      Meeting people on the internet instead of meeting people for real is like driving a Trabant instead of a Mercedes.

      Both do exactly the same thing, get you where you want. Yet, those who cant afford a Mercedes will buy the Trabant and then bitch at the Mercedes people, claiming their Trabants are just as good, if not better. Much to the annoyance to Mercedes people. Seriously, I hang around on IRC and on here because it's interesting at times, not because I crave social interaction with anyone on the internet. That's what a life is for.

    10. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody ought to tell Boulder that their PhotoRadar is illegal...

    11. Re:I don't think so by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats kind of a blanket statement that seems to be purely biased, and lacking some heavy proof. To imply that people who utilize the Internet for social interaction as lacking a life is also a very blanket statement - that is again, purely unfounded and lacking proof. I hang on the Internet for social interaction (as well as informational purposes). Some of the social interaction comes from playing online games which I prefer to non-online games; I also go to clubs, bars, park, movies, coffee shops, beach, vacations, etc. So do I lack a life or do I have a life? Your statements, unfortunately, are totally ignorant. I do not claim to be an "expert" on many topics - but this one I can claim a lot of knowledge on, especially since I have spent many qualified research hours (including studies) with regards to Internet social interactions (Communications major). Then again, you do have valid - reliable evidence stating that most people on the internet social groups are the equivelant of Trabant owners and complain incessantly about not having a Mercedes?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    12. Re:I don't think so by Geek_in_Marketing · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personal experience here. . .I'm getting married in ten days. And I met my partner on the internet.

      If you're busy with work and so on, and you don't necessarily find fighting your way through alco-pop fuelled teenage cretins at the local theme bar to meet the opposite sex, the internet can be a great way of meeting and getting to know people.

      I found it really useful - I was able to talk to people without masses of background noise, and get to know a bit about them _before_ I made the decision to actually meet up with them.

      Three months of regular dates and I ended up meeting the woman of my dreams - she even administers a Web portal!

      So I guess, from my experience, I'd say - go for it.

      --

      "This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
    13. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK rather than make a statement, I propose it be modified to state that 90% of those utilizing the Internet as a means to meet people lack a social life. This is in stark contrast to the, say 35% of people who use bars, pubs, billiards halls, etc. to meet people.

    14. Re:I don't think so by joeldg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hahaha..

      I am working with a team of people to extend FOAF and social networks to help you "keep-track" of your current friends and what it going on with them. I.e. current GPS coordinates, utilizing the MeNowDocument at http://schema.peoplesdns.com/menow/ (which I co-authored) and auto-updating FOAF data through the web for everything from current pictures to current locations (you can even go as far as scripting in which mp3 you are listening to or what webpage you are browsing and this all is updated automatically)

      Anyway, it is not just about "meeting" people (I could care less about meeting new friends, I have enough friends and can barely keep up with them) it is really about organizing them.

      See my .sig for more details

    15. Re:I don't think so by Piobaire · · Score: 1

      I belong to several special interest email lists (music, linux, etc.) and have met quite a few people. I've developed a number of friendships over the years. I think these kinds of lists are different than people in search of other people lists. With common interests, I think people tend to present themselves as they really are (or close to it). With meat-market media, you don't know who or what you're talking to. My 2 cents.

    16. Re:I don't think so by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Funny

      > You might get to know the person, and like the person so that you would want to meet the person.

      Exactly. In fact, I met my wife on a local BBS--we started dating after meeting in person at several get-togethers. We've been married for over seven years now.

      (Of course, we still get on IRC on separate computers in separate rooms, but we prefer to think of that as a charming quirk.)

    17. Re:I don't think so by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      You could always find out what chat room she is in, come on in, and bluntly hit on her and watch the other IRC members oogle at your bravado :) good for you on meeting your wife this way - things like that (open-mindedness) make me feel that there is hope for our world :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    18. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaaak! A 40 year old male. I'm outta here.

    19. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. In fact, I met my wife on a local BBS

      I guess there's a good reason they call you "Mr. Bad Example", then?

    20. Re:I don't think so by ThomK · · Score: 1

      I think what you will find is that someone who has a low tolerance for other people, usually dislikes something about himself, and sees it in a lot of people.

      --

      TK

    21. Re:I don't think so by nounderscores · · Score: 2

      I think we've found Ms Jane Example who does all those credit card ads.

    22. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bars are much better

    23. Re:I don't think so by lowvato · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I don't want to meet people that need the web to meet people. I like boozing with people who need boozing to meet people. But...you know what?...I most like meating people who like to be meated.

    24. Re:I don't think so by bernini · · Score: 1

      I don't agree. I meet people on the web for many years know. I use the Jabber lluna for month now. The point is: you do not talk like you do in (teenagers) chatrooms. You talk about the content, you met on. Once I met a guy on ebay. He told me his sad story about a hardware-shop. I found, that even the shop-website was offline. I think he saved me from spending money on the wrong shop. This is the reason why meeting people is useful (for me).

    25. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are these pages? I want to know.

    26. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming they're not dogs. :)

    27. Re:I don't think so by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      Pretty much my situation also. Most congregations of available people are lound and/or have activities going on so that no-one gets bored. The thing is, that usually doesn't leave room for actually getting to know somebody.

    28. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... i get an email from a girl like that at least once a month. In every email she had just moved to san diego and wants to meet new people, and the next weekend is always her birthday (without fail). She always wants to meet up for some "fun" because she is lonely (and really hot with big umm..yeah), and she just happens to have a webcam she likes to get nasty on just for you, BUT of course, you have to pay for it.
      Like that is gonna happen....

      I was actually able to use WHOIS to look up who this girl really was because she had her own domain registerd to herself. duh! As it turns out, i used to live just a few blocks away from her registerd address. I think it even had her phone number too. I bet she would drop a load if a guy called up and said, "hey, yeah, you emailed me and said you wanted to get freaky this weekend...." :)

    29. Re:I don't think so by Newton+IV · · Score: 1

      yeah, I want an anonymous avatar that looks nothing like me. I kinda like the anonymous chat that this new thing some bloggers are using Chatango seems to have.

    30. Re:I don't think so by Lobsang · · Score: 1

      The virtual presence system including the LLuna2 client is designed to protect the privacy and prohibit any indecent use(...)

      And what's the point of meeting people on the web if indecent use is prohibited? Oh my, the boredom of it all...

    31. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She also emailed me to say she wanted me to get a bigger penis.

  2. We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...for an internal project with the Jabber4R wrapper.

    Jabber ended up being too slow, though, so we built a more specialized message router in C++ - and open sourced it - to replace it.

    1. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Earlybird · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • Jabber ended up being too slow, though, so we built a more specialized message router ...
      While I understand the intended meaning -- that Jabber was not suitable for your application -- I dislike (1) the implication that Jabber is somehow inherently slow (what was slow? The Jabber4R client library? The Jabber server? Which server? Or the architecture?), and (2) the fact that you are providing no new information, but merely throwing out some vague, critical remark about Jabber of no use to anyone, leading up to a shameless plug for your own unrelated product. What was your point, man?

      How about doing a design comparison between Cougaar and Jabber?

    2. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I understand the intended meaning -- that Jabber was not suitable for your application -- I dislike (1) the implication that Jabber is somehow inherently slow (what was slow? The Jabber4R client library? The Jabber server? Which server? Or the architecture?), and (2) the fact that you are providing no new information, but merely throwing out some vague, critical remark about Jabber of no use to anyone, leading up to a shameless plug for your own unrelated product. What was your point, man?

      Whine, whine, whine. Another slobbering Jabber zealot can't understand why everyone doesn't use it for everything.

      How about doing a design comparison between Cougaar and Jabber?

      Cougaar is the Cognitive Agent Architecture, and doesn't have anything to do with Jabber. But if you actually went to the web site, you'd know that. But if you actually did your research, you'd know that Jabber is unsuitable for little more than simple text messages between clients using operating systems (Linux, FreeBSD) which are unsupported by better, commercial-grade IM systems (AIM, MSN, Yahoo)

    3. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by thammoud · · Score: 1

      With a project that has no bugs, no patches, no docs and no messages in a forum, you really have the audacity to even compare this with Jabber. I couldn't care less about Jabber, but you are nothing but a troll.

    4. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 4, Informative

      > the implication that Jabber is
      > somehow inherently slow

      Hm. It was too slow for our purposes - i.e., passing large numbers of large messages around to track a distributed agent system. I'm sure it's fast enough for most uses.

      > The Jabber4R client library?

      Nope, that's fine.

      > The Jabber server?

      Yup.

      > Which server?

      The Java one, I think.

      > Or the architecture?

      Dunno about that.

      > critical remark

      Hm, didn't mean to be critical... just sharing experience.

      > a shameless plug for
      > your own unrelated product.

      It's not really a product, per se... I mean, it's open source and free.

      > What was your point, man?

      To share an experience with the Jabber server and offer a note on our workaround.

      > doing a design comparison between
      > Cougaar and Jabber?

      They're two different things - COUGAAR is a distributed agent architecture, Jabber is a messaging protocol. I'm not sure a comparison is really in order...

    5. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > you really have the audacity to
      > even compare this with Jabber

      It wasn't intended to be a comparison with Jabber; instead, it was meant to be a note on our experiences with Jabber and how we ended up rolling a custom message router for our purposes.

      > you are nothing but a troll

      Hm. I wasn't trying to be one...

    6. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Earlybird · · Score: 1
      • To share an experience with the Jabber server and offer a note on our workaround.
      With a Jabber server. I suspect you would have had greater success with the C server, btw. One nice aspect of the server architecture, incidentally, is that it can easily be clustered, meaning it is extremely scalable.

      • It's not really a product, per se... I mean, it's open source and free.
      While I dislike having to go into a discussion about language, I'd like to point that product implies neither "non-open-source" or "non-free".

      • They're two different things - COUGAAR is a distributed agent architecture, Jabber is a messaging protocol. I'm not sure a comparison is really in order...
      You were able to exchange one for the other, so I do think a comparison is in order; you brought it up. Both include a message routing system.

      Jabber is more than a messaging protocol, though. It's not a single protocol, but a set of protocols. It encompasses presence, discovery (through directory services), gatewaying, routing, conferencing, remote procedure calls, authentication -- additionally, the XMPP protocol is extensible, so there are no limits, really.

      Anyway, as you pointed out, your problem was implementation-related, not necessarily architecture-related; so instead of blatantly generalizing about "Jabber ... being too slow", what you really meant is that one particular Jabber implementation was too slow for your needs.

      Sorry if I'm being harsh, but I dislike people throwing out careless, vague comments that give a bad name to other people's work.

    7. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > You were able to exchange one for the other

      Hm. We didn't exchange COUGAAR for Jabber... instead, we exchanged Jabber for our custom message router.

      > instead of blatantly
      > generalizing about "Jabber ... being too slow"

      I didn't feel it was a blatant generalization. I felt it was a reflection of our experiences.

      > what you really meant is that one
      > particular Jabber implementation
      > was too slow for your needs.

      Correct.

    8. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Neologic · · Score: 1

      You know, it was good to follow this exchange- while the content was critical, it was handled in a flame-free manner. Personally I am shocked to see such a restrained discussion on Slashdot as the one you both had. :)

      --

      "I hate quotations. Tell me what you know." -Ralph Waldo Emerson

    9. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by tcopeland · · Score: 1

      > while the content was critical, it
      > was handled in a flame-free manner.

      Yessir. Earlybird seems to be a savvy guy, so I wanted to kind of try to meet him in the middle on this one.

      > I am shocked to see such a restrained discussion

      Now back to Emacs vs vi, Windows vs Linux, etc :-)

    10. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

      (1) The server got slashdotted for 4 hours. We are sorry. Jabber is fine. Jabber was chosen as a transport for virtual presence because of its features and architecture. If there is a better messaging system, then tell me and we try a Cougaar transport.

      (2) There is plenty of information on the web site, plus a direct link to the spec with introduction, motivation, examples. If you already read that and it is not enough send an email. Product? Since ad-based B2C is almost dead there is no point for the JVP project other than doing work for free and support users for fun.

    11. Re:We used some of the Jabber presence features... by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

      He might have a point. Jabber is "only" the transport protocol. The virtual presence stuff could be done over any flexible messaging infrastructure. Actually the VP project abandoned it sown server and protocol to move to Jabber and become JVP. The transport protocol needs
      1. features and extensibility
      2. specs and a formal process
      3. support and code
      4. trust by operators
      Any platform can qualify. Speed is a matter of course. Speed is simple. The other criteria rule.

  3. Of course not! by jazzmanjac · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's why I'm on the internet to begin with... so I DON'T have to interact with other people. (Well, except for slashdot.)

    --
    Some cats swing, and others don't. Don't you be the kind that won't.
    1. Re:Of course not! by stokkie · · Score: 1

      So you're one of those ppl who chats with bots? :P

    2. Re:Of course not! by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

      You consider slashdot posters 'people'?

      --
      1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  4. no, I don't by kwoff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Being aware of other people in real life is what makes me nervous and bashful. It's a Sartrean thing.

  5. Natural Consequences by Judebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    And of course, their #1 "topsite" is porn. Like we didn't know what it would be used for.

    No, I don't think I'm interested in listening to a bunch of space-hogging attention-whoring avatars while I surf, thanks.

    --

    For geek dads: Contraction Timer

    1. Re:Natural Consequences by no+longer+myself · · Score: 4, Funny
      I don't think I'm interested in listening to a bunch of space-hogging attention-whoring...

      But you're reading Sla--

      Oh nevermind... :-/

    2. Re:Natural Consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The avatars DO look pretty large and obnoxious.
      Large web-sites would be pretty crowded, and I'd hope it waited until AFTER the site was loaded before loading the avatars/chat
      I think it's a cool idea but I'd want to have a fairly configurable interface,
      text only mode,
      resizable,
      fully skinnable,

      and of course the ability to toggle my visibility for covert browsing.

  6. Its vital by Timesprout · · Score: 5, Funny

    that the tens of thousands of geeks out there can compete to meet with the one of the 2 geek girls in the world so the possibility of the uber geek child can become a reality.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Its vital by millahtime · · Score: 1

      If these 2 geek girls had tens of thousands of guys hitting on them and had to spend of bunch of their time dealing with these guys whould they still be considered geeks?

    2. Re:Its vital by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 2, Funny

      so who's the other geek girl?

      --
      99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    3. Re:Its vital by cyborch · · Score: 5, Funny

      If these 2 geek girls had tens of thousands of guys hitting on them and had to spend of bunch of their time dealing with these guys whould they still be considered geeks?

      Well, if they solved the problem by automating the process of dealing with all the guys hitting on them, then yes - they would still be considered geeks :)

    4. Re:Its vital by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 1

      hey I should try that... hmmm automation of rejections, or should I call it an "automated rejections system" and put it on sourceforge?

      --
      99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    5. Re:Its vital by Paulrothrock · · Score: 4, Funny

      Automated Rejection System:

      You have made a/an :
      () stupid
      () hormonal
      () rediculous
      () unconvincing
      () overused
      () evolutionary
      proposal to get into my pants this evening. This will fail because:
      () I have to wash my hair
      () I have a boyfriend
      () I have to download and compile a new distro
      () You are laid off
      () You smell bad
      () I am a lesbian
      Thank you for trying. I am:
      () flattered
      () disgusted
      () demoralized
      () now a lesbian

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    6. Re:Its vital by Claire-plus-plus · · Score: 1

      (*) I am a lesbian

      --
      99 bottles of beer in 175 characte
    7. Re:Its vital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      25/F/See the silhouette in the neighbor's window?

      LOL

    8. Re:Its vital by justkarl · · Score: 1

      that the tens of thousands of geeks out there can compete to meet with the one of the 2 geek girls in the world so the possibility of the uber geek child can become a reality.

      So, we're counting Morgan Webb, right?

    9. Re:Its vital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      considering my experience with girls, those are better made checkboxes instead of radio buttons.

    10. Re:Its vital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      omg j00 r a gurl.

      feel special, yet?

    11. Re:Its vital by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that would be me, actually. Sorry for the other xx,999 guys, but I've already found myself a sweet electrical engineering grad student who's working on network protocol research. Interestingly, I didn't need the internet to find him. We got to know each other when he gave me some advice on a program I was working on, which was soon followed by watching anime together. Our first date was an outing to see Lord of the Rings (Fellowship specifically).

      Sadly, while this seems like a joke post, this is in fact the truth.

    12. Re:Its vital by chialea · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I think one of you must be lying, or the count is somewhat off, as I certainly reside in this category as well.

      Of course, like the good sterotypical geek woman some of you will imagine to be, I've been spoken for.

      Lea

  7. You like /.? I Like /.? Funny we should meet here. by malakai · · Score: 4, Funny

    You like Woman being fisted by donkeys? I like women being fisted by donkeys! Funny we should meet here. ... yeah i can see where this will lead ...

    Mom?!? Dad?!?! Little Timmy!?! What are you doing on donkeypunch.com!?!?

  8. I'm all for it. by bcore · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd say that the more opportunity to meet interesting people in this world, the better, and this just improves the odds of randomly meeting people your probably wouldn't otherwise have to opportunity to meet.

    As long as it doesn't supplant actual real world interaction with people as a primary social outlet, that is..

    1. Re:I'm all for it. by mwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm always puzzled by this sort of reaction. In what way is meeting on a Web page any less "real" than meeting at a bus stop or over the phone? The other person is just as real.

    2. Re:I'm all for it. by bcore · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't disagree, I've met many awesome people through various online things.. I've just found that there have been periods in my own life where I have become so involved with online communities that I didn't put the time into real-world interactions. I find that for me at least, this trap just leads to me not being happy in the real world, so I try to balance online and offline life. To each his/her own, of course..

    3. Re:I'm all for it. by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      In what way is your communications online, not real-world interactions?

      What difference is there between chatting online and talking on the phone, except a stupid snobbish attitude towards online communications?

    4. Re:I'm all for it. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Definition of real.

      If you look at the above link, you will find many definitions of the word, several of which refer to actual, physical things. There is even one specific to physics which refers to an image formed by light rays in space. Another refers to real as the specific antonym to virtual.

      Anyway, you seem to want the original poster to broaden his definition of the word real. He would probably want you to narrow yours. If you are truly puzzled by this, it is probably because you are choosing to be puzzled, not because it is a particularly complex an issue.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    5. Re:I'm all for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So which pages will be the fun to hang out at?

      Dating sites?
      Porn sites?
      goat.cx?
      www.sco.org?
      slashdot?

      What would you do if your homepage became a lluna meetingplace?

    6. Re:I'm all for it. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I'm communicating with someone that I know in the real world I consider online communications to be real-world communications.

      If I'm communicating with someone that I have never met, I consider that to not be real-world and for the communications themselves to be nothing more than a network game.

      When I was a kid I was in the online = real world camp. To put it shortly, it was not good for me. I trusted the wrong people and believed the wrong things and fortunately I came out of it without being killed.

    7. Re:I'm all for it. by bcore · · Score: 1

      I guess the difference is that while friends you meet online are fun to chat with, you generally can't call them up on a friday night (or hell, a monday morning) to go out drinking, or whatever your definition of a fun time out is. :)

    8. Re:I'm all for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As long as it doesn't supplant actual [interaction with real] people as a primary social outlet, that is.."

      Now, good luck finding real ppl, instead of posers.

    9. Re:I'm all for it. by Poeir · · Score: 1

      On a related note, look at my nick. I deliberately chose something nearly impossible to pronounce in order to keep my online and offline lives separate.

      Long story short, most of my real-life friends now call me Poeir. Go figure.

      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
  9. Virtual selling points by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All of these services are just an excuse to gather a huge number of e-mail addresses and connections between people, and then to use that network to market stuff. If there were a service that banned marketing and advertising messages, maybe it would be worth doing. As it is, it almost acts like the "in-crowd", where if you buy what they want, magically you're the most popular. However, so what if people want to meet people online? How is that worse than in an establishment serving alcohol, where everyone's not themselves anyhow?

    --
    stuff |
    1. Re:Virtual selling points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to tie your tin hat on a bit tighter, you havn't cut off circulation to the brain yet.

    2. Re:Virtual selling points by STrinity · · Score: 1

      All of these services are just an excuse to gather a huge number of e-mail addresses

      And how exactly are they going to do that? Jabber servers don't require an email address to create an account.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    3. Re:Virtual selling points by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

      Now that you say it, I remember we forgot to put the email field into the profile. Could have been a big business.

  10. if it by millahtime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it was on the same level as Yahoo Messenger and AIM. There are a lot of different types of people that would be on there then. It would be a little different.

    My guess is that it is mostly nerds using it now. I work with thousands of nerds. Do I really need to meet any more near me?

    1. Re:if it by umrguy76 · · Score: 1

      Yahoo messenger rules. I met my wife on Yahoo messenger. There is hope for geeks everywhere, for I found an intelligent, beautiful woman that wanted to marry me. :)

    2. Re:if it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      She is a very beautiful woman. You should consider yourselves fortunate.

  11. Re:You like /.? I Like /.? Funny we should meet he by ComaVN · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, because your real name is Malakai, and mine is ComaVN

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  12. i can't wait to see the crowds at... by boardumb · · Score: 1, Funny

    goatse, tubgirl and the like "fuck, you got duped into going here too?" "nah, i get off on this shit man"

  13. Could be interesting... by slusich · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While definately not the most obvious use of this software, it could prove interesting on sites such as /., cnn, salon etc. to talk live to others about an article. Posting comments is fine, but it's not live, and it could be days before anyone responds. It's certainly not something you'd leave running all the time.

    1. Re:Could be interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Browse the comments at -1 and ask yourself if you really want to read all of this live.

  14. Re:You like /.? I Like /.? Funny we should meet he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Donkey's have fists? I need to see some of the porn you're watching!

  15. Another nice social networking concept... by fugas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although I haven't downloaded this yet, it sounds like a fun social networking concept to me. Kind of a hybrid of the late Third Voice and the newer StumbleUpon (which I really love)

  16. Re:You like /.? I Like /.? Funny we should meet he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what sort of sick world do you live in where donkeys have fists!

    big d!cked donkeys shagging women - thats what you want....

  17. I for one.. by hookedup · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would much rather ask someone looking at the same website as me if they have seen what I'm looking for, instead of a site map.

    And no.. I dont go walking around the grocery store asking strangers where the broccoli is..

    1. Re:I for one.. by garcia · · Score: 1

      And no.. I dont go walking around the grocery store asking strangers where the broccoli is..

      Why not? Are you one of those assholes that stares blankly at me when I do? Yes ma'am, I am trying to kill you by asking where the broccoli is...

      What is wrong w/our communities when we want to study social networks via the web and we can't even have social networks IRL?

      Everyone is afraid of real life because the truth sucks. The bullshit personas people create for themselves on any of these Internet networks are just what people want. More situational drama to escape reality.

      Dial 411 for assistance.

    2. Re:I for one.. by torpor · · Score: 1

      What is wrong w/our communities when we want to study social networks via the web and we can't even have social networks IRL?

      Easy. Television has made it 'uncomfortable' to be social.

      I, also, hate it when I can't be a perfect, friendly stranger, asking where the broccoli is, without triggering some "Nazi Flight"-like response from Grandma.

      Of course, the flipside to this is, some Grandma's are so burning for love that any chance they get to talk to ... well ... you know where I'm going with this.

      In short: KILL YOUR TELEVISION!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:I for one.. by azuretek · · Score: 1

      I was about to say what's wrong with asking people for help even if you dont know them. I ask people for directions, the time, and countless other things all the time.

      What is wrong with people now... it seems like everyone is afraid of eachother, and I think sometimes they are...

  18. Linux version by serverleader · · Score: 1

    What so geeky about it?.. if you can't get a linux version on their website so we can meet geeky chicks!

    --
    - - - - - . .. . - Get Counted!
  19. the reason i don't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason I do not want to meet people on the web is that they are all stupid people who think the internet is the most rad thing. The problem with that is that all they want to do is talk about the internet and stuff. They do not have the intelligence to join a good conversation.

  20. Sounds like Odigo by linuxtelephony · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sounds like what Odigo started out as about 5 or 6 years ago. They provided you with a display so you could see who else was at the web site you were visiting, then you could IM them if you wanted. There was more, like the ability to search for people, etc.

    However, the lluna interface looks more interesting.

    --
    . 62,400 repetitions make one truth -- Brave New World, Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:Sounds like Odigo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IQC was doing that with ICQSurf years ago too. Whatever happened to that?

    2. Re:Sounds like Odigo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a dumb idea.

      Most people would likely be terrified to think that anyone on their contact list (friends, family, coworkers) could see what web site they were surfing at any given time.

      Most sites have discussion boards where people can create throw-away pseudonyms for that purpose anyway. So where's the benefit for a user to use a service that lets other people and sites easily connect the dots between slashdot, goatse, donkeypunch and them?

      (Posted AC to flaunt the irony :)

    3. Re:Sounds like Odigo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had actually gotten involved in a relationship back in 1999/2000 by meeting though Odigo via Slashdot...

    4. Re:Sounds like Odigo by bernini · · Score: 1

      you are right. like odigo, gooey, cahoots and even ICQ-surf. Where are they now? Maybe the interfaces could not transport the idea. The Jabber lluna tool does very well. You can use your own real appearence (photo) and webcam. I like the feeling, BEEING online.

    5. Re:Sounds like Odigo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too, but I met mine at goat.cx

  21. More face to face interaction by jcostantino · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Even though "online" has such a stigma attached to it, lots of people meet other people just fine. What if someone is severely handicapped and can't otherwise easily leave the house?

    I've met people socially who I met online, some were freaks and some were decent well adjusted people. It's the same as meeting people in the real world.

    I'll admit that I have a bit of social anxiety in person and it's easier for me to start a conversation with a total stranger online and to subsequently dip out on the conversation if I don't like the tone or direction :).

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    1. Re:More face to face interaction by wongaboo · · Score: 1

      A person I know with Crone's diseases must be within 60' of a bathroom at all times. This makes commuting to work basically impossible for him. I met this person through an online college I work for. He now is gainfully employed as a graphic designer working from home using the degree he got at that college. What would this man's life be like if he couldn't meet people online?

      --
      cogito ergo oro
  22. Long bombastic response to follow by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    NO

  23. Neat Idea by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's a pretty neat idea. I've been on a bunch of websites with a pretty active forum *ahem* but that's a little different than just chatting with passers-by.

    I really like the idea, and I'd use it on my own website.

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
  24. Virtual Presence makes you aware of others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never thought I'd see smellovision before flying cars!

  25. Marketing by Stormcrow309 · · Score: 1

    Ten gets you twenty that marketing departments would love this. 'Hey, this is a list of people chating while visiting your website.'

    Honestly, I have enough pain in my life listening to winny 15 year olds on xbox talking about what they did with my mother. I have to see my mother daily, man you guys are sick.

    --

    In God we trust, all others require data.

    1. Re:Marketing by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Ten gets you twenty that marketing departments would love this. 'Hey, this is a list of people chating while visiting your website.'

      That was my first thought but your post makes it sound negative. It aint bad, it's good. People provide marketing feedback on something, now marketing can use this information in the future to make their site more appealing. Oh how terrible.

  26. If i wanted to meet people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative


    i would go down the pub/club/bar/gym/golf/beach/pool

    i have no desire to speak to hotSexyGal14 who is really a fat pasty guy from texas with a hygiene problem and reads comics thanks

    1. Re:If i wanted to meet people by fuzzix · · Score: 5, Funny
      i would go down the pub/club/bar/gym/golf/beach/pool
      I think there's something wrong with me - I saw this post and thought "Wow, that guy's really messed up his filesystem hierarchy..."
    2. Re:If i wanted to meet people by justkarl · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with you...You read slashdot, that's all. By the way, I think all of those are either in /dev or /etc.

  27. So bitter! by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 1

    The virtual presence system including the LLuna2 client is designed to protect the privacy and prohibit any indecent use, be it commercial use, advertising, or profiling. But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?

    Wow, very negative. I don't understand such a knee-jerk bitter reaction. That should be right up there with "Do we really want to be on the Web anyway?" and "I don't know about these newfangled digital cameras; was anything really wrong with film?"

  28. sad! by Theresa1 · · Score: 1

    Will you look at the comments so far!

    I'm going to buck the trend. Yes meeting people with the same interests as myself (presumably) would be great.

    Of couse if the people are all a bunch of sad geeks who hate the thought of ever talking to another person, then it might not be so much fun :-(
    ----

    --
    This is a manual signature virus. Copy to your signiture file and help me spread.
  29. Looks like... by drewhearle · · Score: 1, Funny
    BonziBuddy!

    (that's what the little character looks like, anyway.) Serisouly, it looks like a neat concept though.

    --
    -- If you can read this, you are too close to my signature.
  30. In the good ol' 90s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fell in love with a hot sexy lady on IRC.
    It turned out to be an old man.
    No thanks.
    IRL meetings are foolish.

  31. Virtual Places by zifferent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A program called virtual places allowed you to surf the web and meet people 9 years ago.

    And then AOL bought it and killed it.

    --
    cat sig > /dev/null
  32. Now all I need... by JaJ_D · · Score: 5, Funny

    You can now make friends and be aware of people on the web!

    So I now can order food, beer, Geek toys, clothes, make friends, work and interact - all without leaving my home.

    Now if I could just be able to order sex, I can brickup my front door....

    ....checks google....

    Just found out that all my needs are now catered for.....

    Bricks are being delivered monday!

    :^]

    Jaj

  33. Not really. by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    I don't really think that this is something that most people want. It seems like it might be slightly interesting, for about two minutes, and then you'd turn it off permanently.

    But, while we are mentioning Jabber, I have to say that I am a bit disappointed with Jabber. Overall development of the Jabber messaging platform has been slow since the ratification of the protocol and it seems like this is the type of open source project that should really be making advancements. Messaging in the open source community is second only to mp3 listening. I would have expected a project like Jabber to be leading the way in feature development but, compared to the commercial services, Jabber lags far behind.

    While commercial services are refining their relatively mature products, Jabber has yet to show any sign of features like voice or video conferencing. Features the commercial competitors have had for some time. Indeed, the existing Jabber components are themselves not yet mature. The newer 2.0 reference server lacks 80% of the features of the original Jabber reference server and configuration is a tangled mess.

    This new presence feature is something that no one else has and therefore is a leading innovation. But, at the same time it is a little needed and likely unwanted feature so why not concentrate on other advancements?

    1. Re:Not really. by BinLadenMyHero · · Score: 1

      Maybe that is exactly what they want: a reason for one to use Jabber. Or better: an argument for you to convince the next guy to use Jabber. In fact, the worst of Jabber is that my buddy list is just empty. :P

    2. Re:Not really. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have so many clients that it must be difficult to add a new feature everywhere. Furthermore it must take a lot of work
      to keep the transports running. If this work had been invested better then Jabber would have been more succesful.

      If you want to see Jabber with features, have a look at Cococinella, a Jabber based whiteboard. Sadly Coccinella is a standalone client, so you can only use it's features if your friends are also using coccinella. It is fun to use such a client once or twice, but in the end you give up on starting the client each morning.

  34. At least you can trully say...... by Sv1ad · · Score: 1

    .......I only want you for your intellect.
    Virtual meeting: no make-up, no acne cure, no washing necessary. :P

  35. After the experience... by GypC · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... of reading Slashdot for the last 6 years, I would have to say, "Absolutely not."

  36. lotus Sametime had this by dominux · · Score: 1

    Lotus Sametime is a corporate internal IM/web conferencing tool. Templates for dicussion databases with place based awareness were included in previous versions however in the latest version these have been dropped, presumably because nobody ever used them. You can still use the templates from the old version or roll your own from the API should you wish.

  37. In Real Life by DrugCheese · · Score: 3, Insightful

    IRL I'm sitting here at my keyboard typing this. The internet is no magical Alter Ego machine. I've met people from the internet, it's no different from meeting people in 'real life'. Sometimes it's good, sometimes it's bad.

    Why not ask the question: Do you want to see anyone in REAL LIFE at all?

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:In Real Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought the internet was a figment of my imagination! You mean to tell me it is in fact part of Real Life!?

    2. Re:In Real Life by The+Lone+Badger · · Score: 1

      >Why not ask the question: Do you want to see anyone in REAL LIFE at all?

      The answer to that, in my case, being no.

  38. Spam by DaveKAO · · Score: 1

    Hopefully someone can figure out a way to prevent the system from being abused by spammers before this becomes main stream.

    -"So you're into gotse.cx? How about a nice bottle of KY? 50% Discount!"

  39. The decline of real social skills? by tuomasr · · Score: 1

    I am a geek. I admit it fairly. And I'm young enough to have been involved with computers since 8. Luckily enough my parents forced me to go outside every now and then and miracolously I developed actual social skills. What bothers me is not the development of new social networking technologies, bu the notion that it seems that a lot of teenagers (and even children) are using them and making friends from around the world, sure that's great for developing an international and open view of the world but waht about real social skills? With IRC, MSN, AIM, Yahoo! and countless other real-time systems I fear that soon well have a generation of people that have no actual real social skills and cannot accomplish anything away from the computer. With ever-improving social networking systems, it's easier to find people that share your interests online than it would be in the real world, so why bother with the "real world"?

    If for nothing else, creating new geeks still requires (at least some form of) social/physical contact (although it propably wont take too long before there's a RFC for that, that circumvents this "problem").

    1. Re:The decline of real social skills? by mccalli · · Score: 1
      ...a lot of teenagers (and even children) are using them and making friends from around the world, sure that's great for developing an international and open view of the world but waht about real social skills?

      What's a 'real' social skill? Or more specifically, surely a social skill is a skill that's accepted by society. If society is moving on, and the teenagers' activity does rather suggest that, than all that seems to be happening is that a new group of social skills are being created. It's perfectly possible for those to exist in parallel with the old.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:The decline of real social skills? by mwood · · Score: 1

      Please explain how skilful interaction with people of diverse views, backgrounds, and languages is any more real in personal presence than it is by other means.

      Sure, it's hard to play a game of 1-on-1 basketball over the phone. But running around a court bouncing a ball is not social activity. "Playing a game together" is the social activity, and there are many games which work just fine when the players cannot or do not wish to come to the same place.

  40. Um...huh? by superdan2k · · Score: 3, Informative

    "But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?"

    Well, given that I met someone on match.com more than two years ago and that we're getting married in August, I'd say there's nothing wrong with meeting people on the web.

    If it weren't for the web, I wouldn't have met my font-design mentor, Chank, despite the fact that we live in the same city. Some of my best friends on the planet, I've met through IRC and Livejournal

    That said, I still don't want to have a sitatuation as describe in the article of being aware of people that are surfing the same sites I am. Especially when I'm surfing the pr0n. I mean, yeesh...talk about TMI.

    --
    blog |
    1. Re:Um...huh? by British · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wait a minute, don't you and I moderate the twin_cities lj community?

    2. Re:Um...huh? by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why, yes, I believe we do! Small Internet. :-D

      --
      blog |
    3. Re:Um...huh? by wintermute740 · · Score: 1

      "Well, given that I met someone on match.com more than two years ago and that we're getting married in August, I'd say there's nothing wrong with meeting people on the web."

      Congrats! I met my wife, back in the day, on the BBS scene. We've been marrried over 5 1/2 years now, and were best friends for about 4 years before we started dating. I had also met my best friend on the BBS scene. I've met a few people from the web as well, but normally meet up with meat-space friends online nowadays instead of making new friends online. Not sure exactly why that is (shrug)

  41. I've met lots of great people on the Internet.. by the_rajah · · Score: 2, Interesting

    but not through some random chat-roomish sort of way. I operate some discussion boards and have met some really nice people with whom I have something in common.

    I was introduced to my wife through an e-mail from a mutual friend who I would not have know without the Internet. The Internet is a perfectly valid way to meet people, but not in a singles bar sort of way.

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:I've met lots of great people on the Internet.. by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      The Internet is a perfectly valid way to meet people, but not in a singles bar sort of way./blockquote>
      ??? Oddly enough, that's how I met my wife!
  42. Getting away from people... by ClubStew · · Score: 1

    I like to help others on a development community I haunt, but I really hate it when they request to add me to their lists / see my online presence. I use IM mostly for business, and I actively participate in the development forum because I like to help - not carry on dialog. Besides, in such a situation people stop thinking for themselves when it comes to development problems (typically simple things they can't figure out because they didn't read the API documentation).

    I like not carrying on dialog with people, one of my attractions to the Internet before the web got commercialized.

  43. This can't turn out well. by Flyskippy1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see how this will work: Jabber: You are visiting goatse.cx, there are 1 other visitors. Visitor: Don't you just love looking at this guy. You: Wait... is that you, Mom?

  44. who was that masked...? by papyr · · Score: 1

    is it meeting people or personas and avatars and online handles? i am untrusting enough to always wonder at least a little how much of what comes through is pure fiction. no...i think i like quiet surfing...

    1. Re:who was that masked...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In real life, are you meeting people, or are you meeting personas, masks, and liars? Online really isn't any different than the real world. Other than the absence of a physical form, the people are still the same. Liars online are still liars in real life. People who are honest and friendly online are honest and friendly in real life. Anonymity can change how people act, but it doesn't change who they are.

    2. Re:who was that masked...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not true. I am a troll on slashdot and in the real world I am not. I come here to lie and bully.

  45. Horrible by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I went to this site and was greeted by a hundred thousand avatars who had just come from Slashdot.

    It was horrible

    --

    What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
  46. What do you really want to do? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

    I have always found that it is much more enjoyable to use IM for talking with people I already know.

    Some are nerds, some are normal people, and some have their own CD, but it always gives me a chance to talk, and lets me let out what i want to say because I am a fairly quiet person. And there isn't anything I hate more than being dragged into a coversation with ten complete strangers, which ends up as a flame war within seconds.

    And it beats screaming at the monitor when I get shot down in UT2K4.

  47. Genepool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is cool :) It's also good for the Gene Pool. No more sixth finger for my children!

  48. ICQ had made it by Madarco · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some years ago ICQ (mirabilis) tried to launch something similar: a chat integrated with browser where you meet the people on the same page, but without the avatars. I don't know where it has gone.

  49. No thank you by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    Already I have those women with their webcams going after me in email, IM, etc. I do not need another way to get spammed. I do not want to meet those kind of people. Not to mention another method for viruses to use to try and infect my machine.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  50. Cross-platform? by doktorstop · · Score: 1

    A really nice idea. Not very suitable for people who want their web surfing to be unnoticed (want information, goto web, want to chat - talk to your wife, for god's sake!). But for crazyfied teenagers desperately looking for someone to talk to, get attention and scorepoints (think Lunastorm, Funplanet etc) it's just another toy to replace IM. And all that instead of just goin out and playing football with REAL girls.
    Too bad, though, that it's a windows-oly technology. Think about how linux interest wouyld increase if smth like that was ONLY available for Linux? Yep, huge. But it looks like days when technology was developed on unix/linux and THEN ported to Windows (web, irc, ftp etc.) is over... too bad.

    --
    http://www.automatiq.se
  51. Not even in real life!! by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    I want my communication to be asynchronous and broadcast based like on Usenet or slashdot.

    Like hell I'll be wasting my time looking for cyberbuddies. Now please excuse me, I need to barf.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  52. my last realworld encounter with a chatter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny thing it was. We were online friends for sometime in a linux programming related forum and shared simple interests in ham radio/electronics etc. Couldn't have been a bigger surprise when I picked him up on our way to the Linux symposium in Ottawa.

    His legged was all bandaged up and large abrasions on his right arm. We started talking about it and it turns out he was involved in a Corner Store B&E, shot by the owner during the incident.... None of this I heard while we were online. We had a few beers and he opened up that he had been in prison 3 times already for B&E's and Assault with a deadly weapon. He couldn't make it because of the terms & conditions of his bail....

    Never know what you'll find out there, good luck if you try.

  53. Film by AngstAndGuitar · · Score: 1

    Film is much better than 648x480 or even a much larger resolution image taken with a bad digicam.

    --
    Less look fast, more go fast.
  54. The Dynamics of Anonymity by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having met several people in person that I first met through e-mail or chat (fellow programmers and co-workers from remote locations), I've noticed several interesting dynamics from virtual communications relative to those of "real life." Some of these are obvious, such as judging people by how well they express their ideas and opinions in words (instead of by their appearance or personal hygiene).

    Others are more subtle, and are apparent only over time, such as the speed with which someone responds. Do they think quickly, but type slowly? Do they fly off the handle and just post the first thing that comes to mind, or do they carefully consider every response?

    In most cases, I have found that getting to know someone online, over time, gives you a better perspective on how that person sees themselves. If they have low self-esteem, that will come across (eventually). If they're confident and authoritative, that will show (again, over time). If they're egotistical and full of themselves, they'll have microsoft.com in their e-mail address.

    However, you *can* get to know someone really well on one level (or in a given context), and completely miss another. For instance, I used to manage several mailing lists about Borland Delphi. One of the moderators for the list, named Jo, was moving from one part of South Africa to another, and was offline for a couple of weeks. I had known Jo for years as a serious gearhead when it came to Delphi Database programming. After I asked one of the other moderators about Jo by saying, "Where is he moving?", I discovered that Jo was, in fact, a woman.

    At that point, Jo's signature line took on new meaning (and I got a much-needed lesson in gender stereotyping): "I am a programmer - I don't do relationships."

    Tim

    1. Re:The Dynamics of Anonymity by tribulation2004 · · Score: 1

      Having met my current girlfriend (of a year now) on-line (via lavalife, and then about a billion e-mails before meeting), I definitely agree with your assessment of some of the strengths of the medium. But I think you missed the aspects that were most important to me: spelling, grammar, organization of thoughts, etc. By "screening" e-mail, I was able to save a lot of time, and find someone who pays attention to details, literate, and well organized.

      The real advantage of meeting someone on-line is that you are forced to assess intelligence before looks (whereas I have a definite tendency to do the inverse in real-life). I think the written word is highly underrated in the digital age.

    2. Re:The Dynamics of Anonymity by RubberChainsaw · · Score: 1

      "If they're egotistical and full of themselves, they'll have microsoft.com in their e-mail address."

      This is funny, because I don't work at microsoft, but I use webmaster@microsoft.com as my fake email address on IRC. Doh!

      --
      I welcome our new 99% overlords.
  55. Like "The Palace" by tritone · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How is this any better than The Palace? The Palace is chat software with avatars, sound, interactive environments, and its own nifty RPN scripting language, ipscrae. It was so sucessful that it even made it to the cover of Time, but it faded after it was bought by a company that tried to push its use in the corporate work space.

  56. Uber-geeks! by scottennis · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would fall into the "News for Nerds" as opposed to the "Stuff that matters" category.

    1. Re:Uber-geeks! by justkarl · · Score: 1

      This would fall into the "News for Nerds" as opposed to the "Stuff that matters" category.
      You know, you're on to something.

      Q. What's nerdier than a bunch of nerds talking about talking with a bunch of nerds?
      A. Nothing.

  57. Uhhh no... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a neat little gimmick, but that's about it.
    If you want to socialize while surfing, I suggest getting real friends and adding them to your ICQ/MSN/AIM contact list...

  58. Before the Internet..... by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    ...there were Bulletin Boards which people had to dial up (at 1200 BAUD!) to log in and enter (no "surfing" in those days). Eventually, after much chatter and posting, people arrange to meet for lunch/dinner at a public gathering.

    Oh, what fun to put a face to the name (this was before you could see what the person looked like, due to dial-up speed and technology)! Sometimes, you met a certain someone and you continued a relationship "offline" using a phone (there were no "cell phones" back then), since there was a limited amount of space to send private messages (unless you were lucky with a connected BBS, you had no "E-mail" per se).

    So, yes, you would want to meet people you see online....

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  59. I don't want to meet people online by hqm · · Score: 1

    unless there is some more definite shared interest than visiting a particular web site.
    I think finding common interests and discovering like-minded individuals is what forums and web logs are better at doing.

    I recently installed Yahoo Messenger, because my daughter wanted to chat online. I looked at a couple of the chat rooms, even the purportedly technical ones were total cesspools. Slashdot would be a cesspool if not for the meta-moderation system, I always browse at level 4 or 5, and even then the discussion is marginally civilized.

  60. Can anyone see the instant drawback of this? by Young+Master+Ploppy · · Score: 1

    Boss:Wow, all my employees seem really glued to their screens, they must be hard at work...

    .....clickety click....boss goes to slashdot.org....

    Hey! employee #3433, what are you doing here?
    ..and all of my developers are on here thinking up lame Natalie Portman jokes....grrr.... now where did I put all those P45's....

    --
    http://instantbadger.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Can anyone see the instant drawback of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would only happen if my boss was browsing pr0n.

  61. Re:Nooooo!! by mwood · · Score: 1

    I'm meeting them right here and now. And in some cases it *is* a horrible experience, but other cases make up for the occasional unspeakable encounter.

    Clue: community, society, etc. are all mental constructs having no real physicality in themselves. It's *all* the "real world", folks, or anyway it's all equally as "real" as it gets. Every relationship is intangible -- it's all in your head.

  62. What we really need... by awhelan · · Score: 1

    We don't need another one of these. There are just too many ways to meet people online and not enough people to populate them. I predict about 100 guys and 8 girls from my area will join this, and I will never be on the same website as any of the girls. I will realize this after two weeks and stop using the program.

    What we *do* need is people who are serious about meeting other people to carry active RFID tags linked to a database listing their interests. The receiving device could have a function that makes it beep when it finds a girl who is looking for an overweight coder who lives in his parents basement. Also, ex-boyfriends could add warnings to the database like "She's nuts, run for your life" that could trigger an alarm. I just got bored with wardriving and need a new hobby. I don't see this ever getting old.

  63. ID10T ALERT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RTFS:

    The virtual presence system including the LLuna2 client is designed to protect the privacy and prohibit any indecent use, be it commercial use, advertising, or profiling.

  64. Hell NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a week ago I meet this girl online.. we talk thru im for about a week and she asks for my number... We talk 2 or 3 times on the phone.. I get a weird feeling about this one so I pull the old dont pick up phone for a week.. Girl proceeds to call my cell 15x in 1 week.. fast foward late friday night 1am.. i am drunk at the bar.. phone rings number i have never seen before i pick up and it is her... i quickly hand the phone to a girl i was with and she proceeded to scream at this girl saying stop calling my phone.. now a week later this girl non stop calls my phone at least 3 times a day... i cant change the number because It is too important.. lesson learned

  65. Re:You like /.? I Like /.? Funny we should meet he by October_30th · · Score: 1
    what sort of sick world do you live in where donkeys have fists!

    Well, he/she could be a furry.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  66. nothing wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just a good chance to know more people, that doesnot have to be the only one, but there's nothing wrong to be one way.
    I met my wife on the internet.

    1. Re:nothing wrong by Cnik70 · · Score: 1

      we've all met your wife on the internet :)

      --
      -Cnik
  67. How can you design away messages? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people can send messages, there will be advertising. And believe me, a few months of no earnings compared with the ones that DO have commercial use will have them thinking about that vitamuscle or what have you as a sponsored "special friend".

    --
    stuff |
  68. Do you want to meet people on the Web? by mwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Despite my rants elsewhere about the unreality of the "real world" concept, I'd have to say no. I do not have any unfulfilled desire to meet people on the 'net (or anywhere else). I meet people all the time, netwise and otherwise, and I find this sufficient.

  69. Jabber needs features that the competitors lack. by gnalle · · Score: 1
    This project is a brilliant example of what jabber needs. Instead of just being able to mimick everybody else, Jabber needs to have a few features that the competitors do not have. Otherwise they will never be main stream. (Here I may falsely assume that their goal is to be main stream).


    Personally I have been trying to convince my friends to use Jabber for a long time. But I am using gaim, and they all know that I have accounts on icq, msn and yahoo. Therefore I haven't been able to convince anyone :(

  70. Urgent message from lluna by binkzz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Urgent message

    Slashdot just put up the news. People are downloading and starting LLuna. Our operational server is hoplessly overloaded, because most users use our internal backup server as their primary jabber server.

    If you try out LLuna then please do NOT use the quick start wizard. Please use other jabber servers to log in to LLuna to distribute the load.

    --
    'For we walk by faith, not by sight.' II Corinthians 5:7
  71. more like deadly by wild_berry · · Score: 1

    I think that'd be a human slashdotting.

  72. meeting people online by bad-badtz-maru · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always see the jokes about the futility of meeting girls online. Maybe this misperception that girls are not online is part of the problem! I know quite a few "hot" girls and they all use IM, email, and mobile phone text messaging EXTENSIVELY. Like way more than any geek I know.

  73. Offtopic, but may be of interest to some by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Informative

    But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?

    I didn't think I would, but yes. When I moved to London, I didn't know anyone in the city and had to bootstrap myself a new social network. Graduate school helped, but after a while I wanted more than one group of friends so I turned to Orkut. I've been to a bunch of meetings and generally my experiences have been positive.

    For those interested, I wrote about my first orkut meetup on my blog here.

  74. robbIE's gnu online dating 'service' not: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gnu?

    popular?

    real?

    any longer in existence?

    where the meat hits the street?

  75. Not if they are all Windopes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?

    Maybe I'd be interested if you could set preferences to eliminate Windopes. These will be 90% of the people out there. Maybe add a browser filter, so you never see people who are using MSIE.

  76. Re:Jabber needs features that the competitors lack by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
    That's right.

    Could you/is there any game support in Jabber? It seems to me that an open protocol gives people the opportunity for turn-based games such as chess or backgammon.

  77. On-line presence chat-up lines for /. by GlynDavies · · Score: 1

    Q) Do you come here often?
    A) Oh yes - every 5 mins or so while the boss isn't looking.

    Q) Haven't I seen you here before?
    A) No, but you might have read my blog.

    Q) What's a nice girl like you doing at a nerdy place like this?
    A) I'm not.

    No, it's clear, they don't work in the real world, and they ain't gonna work in the on-line world. ;-)

  78. Shallow by gt25500 · · Score: 1

    90% of the people I've met on the net are ugly, disgusting, low lifes. Now to wait for Google to pick this up... then for the low lifes to find this and hunt me down by WHOISing my domains :/

    --
    _________ Help me get a PSP!
  79. Not really by essreenim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you meet someone face to face, there is much more polite and civil (hopefully) openings.

    It is more genuine.
    The person in an internet chatroom could be
    a paedophile for all I know. I can't use my intuition to determine this because there IS no presence. This is just another fad that would waist my time.
    I don't believe in on-line presence.
    If its not someone I already know in person, I would rather talk to AI online - honestly!

    1. Re:Not really by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really, and the person you meet at a bar, park, restaurant, club, etc.. cannot be a paedophile? The fact that there is no presence makes the interaction safer. You can chat with the person for months, and then chat with the person on the phone, and if you continue to proceed to meet the person face to face, you are better off (much better) then if you just randomly met the person on the "street." At least, utilizing the Internet method, you have some time you can attempt to get to know the person - on the street, if the person is psychotic, you may have very little warning. To assume psychopaths only proliferate on the internet is naive and wrong. Your example is sorely lacking. And your statement about being "genuine" lacks evidence. In fact, people are more blunt on the Internet because they have a certain sense of protection - hence people are more willing to speak their mind. While some people cannot control their emotions and decide to lash out, many people utilize this form of communication as a way to voice their, legitimate opinions, without feeling pressured due to society rules. That is VERY genuine.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:Not really by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Your example is sorely lacking.
      All I'm saying is when I meet someone, in my heart, I believe I can tell there nature - nature doesn't lie!
      Of course chat is useful - thats what we're doing now and although you sound like a really nice person, Avilazar, how can I be sure. I like old fashioned traditional ways of meeting allot.
      I use we chat usualy for work related activity.

      That just me! I hope you are a spiritual person.
      If so, I believe you should try and meet people face to face more often. I live in Ireland so if you ever com over here, you can meet up if you want!

      Its the same for women I "fancy"!. I believe in simplicity if its the matter of attraction. I believe love needs this foundation of early attraction to blossom fully. Maybe thats why I tend to like innocent people allot .. I don't know, its a crazy world and I'm rambling...score 0 - offtopic!!

      Best of luck to you!

      Someday if there's a nuclear hollocaust and I'm lonely we may meet again (online)!!

    3. Re:Not really by AviLazar · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There are obvious advantages to meeting in person - body interactions, voice inflections, etc. I agree that it is easier to read people in person (and sometimes damn near impossible to read people online). Thank you for saying I may be a nice person...I like to think that I am. (my name is Avi). I do meet many people face - face, I utilize a blend of both online and offline. Everyone needs to find the niche that works for them. My problem comes around when people assume that online engagements are sub-par. Good luck to you, and enjoy a good room temperature beer for me :)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    4. Re:Not really by essreenim · · Score: 1

      Have a pint of elvin draught, on the house!!
      : )

    5. Re:Not really by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "I can't use my intuition to determine this because there IS no presence."

      Not true. You'd be surprised how hard it is to be convincing about anything on-line. I'll never forget when this guy was bugging me for ops. He tried to lure a favor from me by pretending to be female. "I have big hooters!" Yeah, that's exactly how women talk.

      "I don't believe in on-line presence."

      Again, I think you'd be surprised. Heck, look at Slashdot. We've got some real characters here. Go check out the forums. People very much settle on identity.

      Maybe I'm just a titch biased. I owe my having a girlfriend and a job to having an on-line presence. I met my gf of the last 3 years via an IRC get-together. My prescence on the CGTalk.com forums got me noticed. A new studio went up and they needed another artist. Noboody's disappointed yet.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Not really by gfody · · Score: 2, Funny

      also.. the people you meet on the internet tend to be sober. people you meet at bars/parties/wherever tend to be drunk (at least tipsy enough to make an otherwise inverted character talk to strangers).

      my problem with meeting people on the internet is that they tend to be overweight and ugly :\

      --

      bite my glorious golden ass.
    7. Re:Not really by justMichael · · Score: 1
      also.. the people you meet on the internet tend to be sober. people you meet at bars/parties/wherever tend to be drunk (at least tipsy enough to make an otherwise inverted character talk to strangers).
      Obviously we haven't met ;)

      I'm not sure why you think that people you meet online tend to be sober... Hell I find it harder to tell if they are drunk or sober and normally don't care. They are either pleasant to interact with or they aren't.

      Online you don't know if they are just a cheerful person or have a pleasent buz, on the other end are they just an obnoxious person or they have exceded pleasent buz and become a bitter drunk having a bad day.

      At least when you walk up to a person and they have a drink in their hand it's a decent indicator that they either have been or are about to be drinking.

      Maybe if you had to use a Breathalyzer before interaction so your computer could automatically append a disclaimer...

      WARNING: Person at keyboard is drunk.
    8. Re:Not really by ACPosterChild · · Score: 1

      I agree. Heck, there are even studies that show the people are less inhibited on-line (as if that's not obvious by anyone who's used it as a communications medium in any substantial way). It lets you see inside people quicker. It lets introverts converse more freely.

      I met my current gf online 5 years ago. We sent emails for a few weeks, then talked on the phone for a few months, then met in person. It sure as hell was a better experience than yelling over loud music in a bar trying to get the attention of a girl who's been hit on 50 times already that night. That especially goes for guys like me who've had plenty of girls find their dorkiness attractive, but mainly after a number of conversations have taken place; i.e. not exactly the tall, dark, and I-don't-care-if-you-don't-speak-my-language-just-t ake-me-to-bed evoking type.

    9. Re:Not really by cgenman · · Score: 1

      People very much settle on identity.

      I haven't settled on identity.

    10. Re:Not really by cgenman · · Score: 1

      I haven't settled on identity.

      Yes you have. Shut up.

    11. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually form a very practical point of view is better to ask at someone at your site aboute references, opinions, etc. I'am talkin here about news sites, shoping, anything, it's like ask somone opinion at a library whitour making noise...

    12. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can tell there nature - nature doesn't lie!

      "their".
      And nature lies all of the time.
      For example, in person, I rarely correct a person's spelling, so there is no way you'd know that I'm an anal spelling Nazi.

    13. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      otherwise inverted character

      "introverted".

  80. Thats because.. by essreenim · · Score: 1

    ..you are only one person, who can only meet a finite amount of people PROPERLY in this world at any given time... ..and also because some people you want to meet and some you don't!

  81. Meeting local friends on the net? by sacrilicious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone have success using the net to meet people who are geographically local? I moved recently to the remote outskirts of a metro area, and have been trying to use the net as one of the ways to meet people who might have friendship potential. I've looked at IRC, but had no luck finding channels that aggregate people by locale. I don't want to post on a match-making service, as I'm not after a relationship. Any stories of success out there?

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  82. This has been around for a while. by rebe01 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Too bad Odigo has had this feature for a few years now. They call it "radar" or something like that, and it actually got annoying when people messaged you that were on the same website.

  83. Re:FP for mercatur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What the fuck is up with this mercatur shit? People keep infering there's some hot woman or something there, but whenever I click on it, I get some "Page Not Found" crap. Then today, I get some shit about a broken power cable.

    Sort it out. Even the GNAA have a working website.

  84. oh to have my mod points back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't worry, i'm sure they're not interested in meeting people who think only in cliches either.

  85. Yes... by antdude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because I have speech and hearing impediments so it is hard for me to socialize in person. I used to socialize on chat BBS' before Internet was hot. Now, I use IMs, e-mails, etc. to socialize. Also, it keeps my physical appearance invisible to new people that don't know me.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  86. The Rejection Form by Landaras · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, as a guy, I automated part of the process of being rejected by women.

    - Neil Wehneman

    1. Re:The Rejection Form by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      That was inspired. I hope that it never gets used.

    2. Re:The Rejection Form by jacksonyee · · Score: 1

      Wow... I created a dating application as a joke for one of my girlfriends in the past, but this by all means exceeded my attempt. I'm currently in the process of sending this around to all of my female officemates, and I'm sure that they'll appreciate your efforts. A good woman will love you and appreciate you for who you are rather than what you need to change; they're hard to find, but if you have the patience to wait for one, you won't regret it.

      P.S. Tell whoever created the OSU CCC website to avoid that splash screen or at least create a HTML link off of it. I'm not saying that ours at Virginia Tech is much better, but for those of us who deletes the flash plugin on sight, it'll make our web browsing lives a bit easier.

  87. Like asking a fellow shopper for their advice? by amichalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As I understand it, this is like being able to turn to a shopper on the same isle as you in a retail store and ask what they think of product XYZ, or turning to the person behind you at a rock concert and saying "Man can Neal Peart play those drums!"

    I can see this being helpful, but at the same time, I would think the desired web default would be to ignore the person who doesn't know what it is they are looking for (isn't Google for that?) or wants to talk about the video stream I am trying to enjoy (isn't IRC for that?).

    Basically I think it is a cool application of technology, but if people want to talkabout a website, they already can (isn't /. for that?).

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  88. Re:Jabber needs features that the competitors lack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm... I don't think that a Jabber protocol for turn based games would not be able to compete with java sites like games.yahoo.com. A Jabber client would end up being clumsy in comparison with the java sites and the number of available games would be smaller.

    But how about a Jabber metaserver? These days Linux gaming face the problem that the problem that the number of games is larger than the number of players. Actually the number of tetris clones is larger thatn the number of players. This means that whenever I log into a metaserver I don't meet any people. I would like to have some common meeting place where I can meet likeminded gamers and start a game of choice.

  89. The question is.... by east+coast · · Score: 1

    Does anyone on line want to mean you?

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  90. No way!!! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't want to meet people on the web. No way! If I wanted to meet people, I'd go outside. (For those who haven't been there before, that's the area located beyond the perimeter of your home.) But I don't want to meet people. I want to sit on my ass and read the web. So, no, I don't want to meet people on the web.

  91. Assholes are mutually incompatible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and most people are assholes. In fact, the vast majority of people are assholes, and don't realize it.

    People like to think well of themselves. Therefore, they don't go out of their way to find out ways in which they are being assholes, and correct them. Instead, they block their own assholishness from their field of view, make a few rationalizations, and basically dislike everyone else for doing the same thing.

    Of course, there are SOME people who are not assholes...but they are hard to find.

  92. More useful with cel phones by phlack · · Score: 1

    Or PDA's. Then you could go Toothing. At least then you're already out and about.

    1. Re:More useful with cel phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Psst.. There is no toothing. It was a joke :)

  93. Sure I want to meet people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a geek I have a hard enough time finding friends who share my interests. Its not because I am unfriendly or antisocial either there just are not that many people in the general population that enjoy programing or get excited about Linux kernel developments. I have lots of friends but not lots of geek friends. It would be wonderful to meet people who frequent the same websites, as chances are pretty good we would have something in common. What a great idea.

  94. Re:FP for mercatur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The woman is a shameless cam-ho and isn't even all that hot, to boot.

    You must have low self esteem to lust so pathetically after a woman who would only plant her boot in your croch even if she let you get near her.

  95. Not meeting people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't understand the people who are saying that they don't want to meet people online. What are you doing talking to people on slashdot then.
    It sounds like a reasonable method of meeting people of similar interests.

    1. Re:Not meeting people? by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      just talking
      would you like to mingle with greasy geeks?
      no its ok - don't answer.

  96. I met my wife online. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've been together for just over eight years, married for almost 6, and we have a 4-month-old daughter.

    So, can you and should you meet people online? Hell yes!

    Um, if they want your credit card right away, they're not just being inquisitive. ;)

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  97. Third Voice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't AOL sue Third Voice for doing this? I thought that they argued that customers could post anti-AOL sentiment on "their" website.

  98. Metaverse by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    The Metaverse will not happen due to people creating monolithic apps or projects, but will happen by the integration of small protocols such as this... from VPP its easy to add a "model" of the presence, and thus create space.

    --
    meh
  99. -1 bad link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The link doesn't work

  100. i used to want to meet people... by Gribflex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I was in high school, used IRC. A lot.
    The people I met were great. we formed close friendships, and met occasionally in real life. Also, it was fun being able to tell people that of my friends, more than half of them were a complete mystery to me in all of the normal ways that people identify with others. I didn't know their names, their gender, their skin colour, where they lived, what they did for a living, how old they were, what they looked like, etc. I just knew what we talked about. And it was good.

    Then some of my friends started using ICQ. I could handle that, it was fun having quick text messages outside of IRC, or with the people that couldn't handle the concept of online chat (it really is a skill). It wasn't bad.

    Then people switched to MSN. I don't know why. I still contend that there is no advantage over icq, and that people should still be using that. But ah well. Anyhow, the point is that because of the way that msn works, I can't handle online chat anymore. The interaction process with other people is overwhelming. Everything flashes, and beeps, and dings, and jumps up out of the bottom of my screen. It's like I'm being attacked from 7 different directions everytime I log on. Not to mention, most people think I'm a dick and lose interest if I haven't responded to them wihtin 2 seconds.

    Now, I use my computer to browse blogs (and slashdot and fark, whish loosely fit into that description) and do my homework.

    It used to be a tool for interaction, now interacting sucks balls.

    ah well, what are you going to do?

  101. Hyperverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The hyperverse will happen before the metaverse, and then comes the superverse.

    1. Re:Hyperverse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the transverse will come first

  102. Meeting people is easy by billyradcliffe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For people like me who are socially retarded, the internet is a wonderful place to meet people. I've been meeting people from the net for the past 5 or 6 years, and I haven't had a single bad experience. It was exciting to finally meet and hang out with people who shared the same interests as me. Face it, when you're a total computer nerd with elitest tastes in music, people who share those interests are pretty few and far between. What better way to meet people with those interests than, say, a forum for one of your favorite bands?

    So far, thanks to the internet, I've met a number of amazing people. I met my first somewhat girlfriend over the net, I met a band who I ended up joining and moving out to PA to be a part of (then stole the drummer's girlfriend and had my first true love for 2 1/2 years). As recent as this week, I met a girl who I'll be travelling from my home state of MI to IN to go to a concert with.

    You do get a good sense of what people are like by chatting online. You say things without inhibition. There aren't any social hangups. You don't have to worry about ackward silence. You can bail out at any time. You can say how you really feel without stuttering or blushing.

  103. Well, now that I think about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Of all of the important (non-family) people in my life, only one or two were *NOT* met on-line. This goes for all of my lasting friends from computer group gatherings (as a result of the BBS days), to my beautiful, intelligent wife.

    That's right. My wife. I knew what I wanted and reasoned that a database search was far more likely to locate what that was than random chance. It took me a week of research, and cost me $1.25. As I've told her many times, she is definately the best value I've ever received for $1.25.

    Funny that there would be a geek chick on-line like that... (Albeit a language geek). Do I want to meet people on-line? For intj's like my wife and me, that's probably the very best way.

  104. MS Comic Chat from like 95 by Animekiksazz · · Score: 1

    This reminds me a lot of that MS Comic chat I used to use when I was 11-12 in Windows 95. Nothing new about this IMO. But then again I didn't really RTFA much.

    1. Re:MS Comic Chat from like 95 by The+MESMERIC · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah Comic Chat was great fun.
      Specially the ATH+++0 exploit and then the /con/con :)

  105. What about a site getting slashdotted? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    How will you be able to read a webpage filled with thousands of avators ?
    (like.. while a decent slashdotting?)

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  106. Re:FP for mercatur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She is indeed very pretty, but her sister is even more beautiful.

  107. Bestial midget porn by Charcharodon · · Score: 1
    Actually this could be a very usefull tool when trying to find information and meeting people. Most of my favorite websites I found through others, not a search enginee.

    At the same time I'd see a need to have the "not connected" option, for when you want a little alone time while perusing your favorite beastial midget porn site.

  108. Let's be honest by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 1

    But: do you want to meet people on the Web at all?

    Yeah, but only if they are super-hot chicks looking for sex!

    --
    Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
  109. Re:sorry, but i couldnt help but grab the first po by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job!
    Cheers mate :-)

  110. Smell 'O Net by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    Want to know what kind of risks you take meeting someone online?

    1. Go the a moderate to large MtG tournament.
    2. Inhale deeply and smell the air.
    3. Rember many of these people are hanging out online wanting to meet somebody.
    4. Is it worth the risk?
    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  111. This could be disappointing by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

    I think some guys will be disappointed when they use this and find that not as many girls like porn as previously thought. That might make for an awkward virtual room...

  112. i met my wife online... by claus68 · · Score: 1

    we are married for almost five years now.

  113. I could see uses for this by dethb0y · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It could be interseting to meet people who are all, say, hanging out at a site for a given game or something along those lines. Or who are hanging out at a specific message board.

    But i also don't see any real serious potential for this to "change" anything. Take for example users of a given product like a printer. How many people "hang out" at the printer's website? How many people just browse around for hours at adobe's site, for example?

    The biggest advantage this brings is that it can tighten community based web sites a little bit, but that's about it, i would think, save in relatively rare cases like when a product's site has a very active forumn.

    --
    "Nothing excites jaded grandmasters like a Theoretical Novelty" - Dominic Lawson
  114. Re: most people are assholes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not an asshole, you asshole. I basically dislike you.

  115. Re: Those sound like some good people. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People, people who meet people, are the luckiest people, in the world.

  116. Do you want to meet people on the internet? by cfuse · · Score: 1

    No.

    I don't even want to meet people in real life. In fact, don't speak to me or make eye contact.

  117. Re:FP for mercatur by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who would only plant her boot in your croch even if she let you get near her

    good point

  118. Why not? by KlausBreuer · · Score: 1

    Hey, it's just another medium, another way of meeting people. And for us computer geeks, it sounds like a typical way.

    So here's my advice: simply try it. Don't think about fat, pasty, pimply nerds sitting in the dark before glowing screens pretending to be pretty girls, just try it.

    People like us tend to spend a lot of time in front of a screen, and a lot less running about the beach or parties. We simply don't have the *time*, as well.

    So: use the computer to find people.

    I did. Found my current girl-friend. Am seriously happy about it ;)
    And you know what? Didn't even take long.

    --
    Free PC version of ChipWits at http://www.breueronline.de/klaus/chipwits/
  119. Best part of meeting over the web by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You get to see naked pictures of them before meeting in person!

  120. The solution to your problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should combine the drinking with the meeting in person, that way the fat, ugly person in front of you will look a lot better.

  121. Speaking of MUDs by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

    The next step is to walk around on the Web with your in game avatar. It's time to break the barriers between virtual worlds. To go from a virtual/gaming world to the web with the same avatar, and maybe even between different virtual world.

  122. Professional meeting support by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

    That's definitely the trend. Maybe our children will regard our old ways of meeting and getting to know people as backward amateurism: "Any sane person would use a professional service to meet the significant other for the rest of the life. Would you relay on chance and luck for a thing that important. You even pay for cutting your hair"

  123. Re:Jabber needs features that the competitors lack by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

    Right, one important goal of the JVP project is to win users for Jabber. Virtual Presence is messaging and closely related to (IM)Presence. If Jabber doesn't catch the VP users then other IM platforms will.

  124. I don't think so by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

    There is a diffence between meeting real and virtually. There are so many people who socialize on the net, but not in the real world. They are great warriors and mighty mages, starship captains and Jedi. They communicate thru avatars. I wonder if they would like to take their avatar to the Web.

  125. Correction: bugs, patches, docs by Wolfspelz · · Score: 1

    Are we really talking about this project. No bugs?. No patches?. No docs?. No specs?.