Slashdot Mirror


Linux PVRs Highlighted

foolinator writes "Yahoo News is featuring an article highlighting TiVO alternatives. This includes MythTV (my favorite), Freevo, and even sites on how to start as a newbie. All of us who subscribe to the mailing lists be prepared to help out the newbies as Linux PVRs become more mainstream."

264 comments

  1. TiVo uses Linux too! by mdrejhon · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is great -- more PVR software to help innovate PVR along.

    But remember, TiVo uses Linux too! There's a TiVo hacker forum here.

    1. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by stanbrown · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But they have done a pretty good job of locking you out, satrting with the Series 2 units. I personaly think this is a serious abuse of the GPL.

      --
      nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
    2. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by bogie · · Score: 1

      I just absolutely love pointing that out to people when they say Linux is always hard to use and can't possibly be made into a usable PVR.

      --
      If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    3. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      They provide source code, under the GPL, for all GPL licensed software that they use. You can get this from their website. Doesn't that meet all the GPL's requirements?

    4. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      They provide source code, under the GPL, for all GPL licensed software that they use. You can get this from their website. Doesn't that meet all the GPL's requirements?

      No. They lock you out of modifying your machine in any way, or at least they attempt to. That's not in the spirit of open source software. If TiVo actually cared about the community instead of just using them for cheap labor to build a royalty free base OS they'd put a serial console port and an ethernet NIC on it and provide instructions on how you can ssh into the TiVo and start hacking away at it to do other things like MP3 playing or streaming movies from a PC ala ReplayTV's DVarchive project. I will never, ever understand supposedly open source advocates using and promoting TiVos, possibly the most closed PVR system available.

      And before the TiVo fanboy moderators mod me down as a troll, I'd like to point out that I run a *real* open source Linux PVR system using MythTV on the backend w/Debian GNU/Linux as the base OS and an Via Epia M10000 as a frontend system using Minimyth (www.linpvr.org). Both these projects have made making a Linux PVR a snap.

    5. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by Moofie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What does the GPL software have to do with the totally proprietary hardware system they have developed?

      Want a better hardware implementation of TiVo? Take the software and port it to your toaster. Quit whining that they're not doing what YOU want them to do. DIY.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by sublimespot · · Score: 1

      I compiled and run GKrellM-server on my TiVo. It rocks

    7. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by Yer+Mom · · Score: 2, Informative
      TiVos, possibly the most closed PVR system available.

      I think Sky+ probably has it beaten... I certainly don't think there's anything like the range of hacks available for that one...

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
    8. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by cthrall · · Score: 4, Informative

      > things like MP3 playing

      That's one of the things I use my Tivo for...playing MP3 files off my desktop over 802.11b.

      > I will never, ever understand supposedly open
      > source advocates using and promoting TiVos,
      > possibly the most closed PVR system available.

      I wanted an appliance that just worked, that I didn't need to build from scratch or support.

      Oh, and here are some links for hacking a Series 2:

      http://tivoutils.sourceforge.net/
      http://www.de aldatabase.com/forum/forumdisplay.php ?f=51
      http://www.dealdatabase.com/forum/forumdisp lay.php ?f=47

      In hindsight, you are a troll.

    9. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Want a better hardware implementation of TiVo? Take the software and port it to your toaster. Quit whining that they're not doing what YOU want them to do. DIY.

      I swear to Christ some of you people must be getting free TiVos or something. I've never advocated ANYTHING as rabidly as TiVo fanboys do. They rival Mac and Amiga fanboys in the blind faith they have in their devices. I've used a TiVo and find it absolutely crippled compared to my MythTV box.

    10. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by Raptor+CK · · Score: 1

      Why don't you ask them for the source code to their GPL'ed components, then, and prove it?

      "GPL" != "Immediately hackable"

      They can lock the box itself down however they want, even using closed source tools if they'd like, so long as they provide the source for any GPL'ed components on request. Not that I like the Series 2 lockouts, but let's not muddle the issue.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    11. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      I wanted an appliance that just worked, that I didn't need to build from scratch or support.

      That's what is really nice about the TiVo.

      It "just works" very intuitively out of the box, but if you want to get a little bit more out of it then you can gradually learn to do more and more.

      Eg, I felt comfortable upgrading to 2 * 100 GB hard drives, but haven't yet attempted to do Ethernet.

      You don't have to get out a soldering iron to upgrade your TiVo, just have some time to read and take things at your own pace.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    12. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by Moofie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't own a TiVo. I don't like TiVo. I won't pay TiVo for the privilege of looking at their guide data.

      See, I DO want a better hardware implementation than TiVo. So I'm going to do it myself. The difference is, I don't whine about TiVo not doing it for me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:TiVo uses Linux too! by zonker · · Score: 0

      care to point to where in the gpl they are violating?

      perhaps i overlooked something tivo is doing against the gpl, but just because you don't agree with how they operate doesn't mean they are breaking the law...

      btw, 'open source advocates' and 'linux advocates' aren't mutually exclusive...

  2. Does this really apply? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Tivo is a service. The service is tied to a hardware platform, but it's still a service.

    It occurs to me that trying to use one of these alternatives will work great until the automated TV listing parser stops working due to a moved web page or some other problem.

    I would be willing to update a system every couple of months if necessary, but my Mother sure wouldn't...
    more importantly, Dave Letterman wouldn't.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Does this really apply? by dg41 · · Score: 1

      It is a problem, it seems like there are new builds of XMLTV (used by MythTV) out frequently because of a minute change in the source. However, it still beats the TiVo monthly fee.

    2. Re:Does this really apply? by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Tivo is a service. It occurs to me that trying to use one of these alternatives will work great until the automated TV listing parser stops working due to a moved web page or some other problem.

      I am more trusting of a freely available software package rather than a service. What happens if Tivo goes bankrupt or ups the price or whatever?

      If a website changes and code needs to be fixed the people running the software will do so and get the changes down to the endusers quickly.

      Even if it doesn't work anymore at least I wouldn't be losing money like I would if Tivo died.

    3. Re:Does this really apply? by Snad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It occurs to me that trying to use one of these alternatives will work great until the automated TV listing parser stops working due to a moved web page or some other problem.

      Indeed. I was very interested in MythTV, but given that there are currently no active, reliable ways to obtain the program listings for New Zealand television (such as it is...) the whole thing became rather moot.

      One of the great advantages I saw was being able to present my gf with a list of TV program names on screen that she wanted to record (or had recorded and therefore could play back), rather than dick around with the video tapes and the (let's face it) pathetic UI that exists on most video recorders.

      Without that program listing things like MythTV lose some of their gloss.

      The obvious solution being that I should create my own mechanism for scraping NZ TV websites for program listings but I spend far too much time on /. to have time to create, and more importantly maintain, such a method. My gf, and my mother, and their work colleagues would be even less inclined to do so.

      Of course, being in such a small country we're SOL with regard to any kind of TiVo-like service anyway.

    4. Re:Does this really apply? by elykyllek · · Score: 5, Informative

      The latest version of MythTV uses Zap2It's datadirect service which does not scrape webpages. They have also said in their forums that it will remain free, your only obligation is to fill out a survey every three months to continue the subscription.

    5. Re:Does this really apply? by Gaewyn+L+Knight · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ahhh yes young grasshopper....

      But zap2it.com is catching on and just added XML data downloads to their labs. They call it datadirect or some such nonsense. No more parsing hundreds of webpages for the listings. You just get a nice XML download. Mythtv already supports it great.

      Check it out yourself at http://labs.zap2it.com.

      MythTV has a code to use for signup in their setup documents and with that and a short survey you are in business.

      --
      Telcos have alot of dark fibre in the States. Most people assume that's optical fibre...but it's actually moral fibre.
    6. Re:Does this really apply? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 3, Informative
      That's where TCO analysis comes into play. How much is it worth to you to have someone send you the updated stuff, automatically, over the life of the hardware as compared to the do-it-yourself DVR?

      I doubt that I could build a computer to do what TiVo does for less than twice what a TiVo costs (just the hardware), add monthly fees - and I'm thinking that it would take two or three years to break even.

      This stuff is really cool - and I like the fact that a single system can stream video across my home, but I wouldn't realistically use this.

      Finally, with David Letterman (Late night talk-show host, for those whom don't know) plugging TiVo continuously on his show... I doubt that TiVo is going away anytime soon.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    7. Re:Does this really apply? by forevermore · · Score: 1
      until the automated TV listing parser stops working

      Yeah, except that zap2it now provides users with a direct xml feed for free (well, at the cost of a small survey every 3 months). It's integrated into mythtv, and there is a grabber for xmltv.

      --
      Do you really need reason for beer? Wingman Brewers
    8. Re:Does this really apply? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Uh, again - me, sure. My mother, no way in hell would she do that. Hell, my wife is really computer savvy, but that's far to much of a pain in the ass for her as well.

      Also, I remember the last company to say they would keep a product free, just fill out this form.

      It's a subscription at a different price. Time vs. Money.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    9. Re:Does this really apply? by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

      "it occurs to me that trying to use one of these alternatives will work great until the automated TV listing parser stops working due to a moved web page or some other problem.
      "

      Fair point... except most of the major homebrew PVR software applications no longer use screenscraping. IIRC the latest XMLTV uses a direct connection to get the guide data (from zaptoit i *think*)... the guide data is starting to find ways to partner with the diff software out there...

      Also although it's not free (either as in beer or speech) software like SageTV (which i'm in love with for it's pvr 350 support) and snapstream's beyondTV include the listing service, if i'm not mistaken...

      *shrug*

      e.
      --> hey /. crowd take it easy on my site please it's had a rough day =)

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    10. Re:Does this really apply? by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Same thing happens with a local "independent" station in our area where one of the jockeys plugs the iPod every 3 songs and plays a song from his while doing it. Whenever that guy gets on I just change the station.. it's damned annoying.

      But I just "built" myself a MythTV PVR using KnoppMyth. TCO = almost zero. Honestly all I did was use the old Gateway computer my girlfriend used to use before I built her a new system (which we were planning to do anyways) with a bit of extra money and a lot of the parts I still had hanging around. The only thing I really added to the old system was the video cap card I had in my system anyways.

      I figured if I wasn't using the cap card or the old machine, why not do something handy with it that would keep me from spending a couple hundred on a PVR and service charges.

    11. Re:Does this really apply? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So, why turn my back on cheaper hardware (TiVo), for a slightly lower subscription service (Any of the alternatives) just to use a fully Open product (TiVo runs on Linux, too).

      To me, if TiVo's the best, and still cheaper (at least for the first couple of years of use), why use homebrew except for bragging rights?

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    12. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      there are currently no active, reliable ways to obtain the program listings for New Zealand television

      I have been to NZ. You have no television.

    13. Re:Does this really apply? by stanbrown · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a high level of concern over this issue, also. I would be happy to pay a reasonable cost (say 50% of the TIVO fee?) for a reliable long term non changing source of listings. I'm suspicous of this whole "Direct" Zap2It thing. They want to issue you a "certificate", and then require you to fill out a survey. And for all this you get about 3 months of service. I suspect that their bussiness model will not work any better (if they have one) than so many of the dotcom models. Someone pleas convince me I'm wrong.

      --
      nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
    14. Re:Does this really apply? by nathanh · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Indeed. I was very interested in MythTV, but given that there are currently no active, reliable ways to obtain the program listings for New Zealand television (such as it is...) the whole thing became rather moot.

      Yeah, good point. The live-tv stuff I must admit isn't very useful to me. What I use MythTV for is saying "I want all episodes of BLAH and you figure it out". Then I come back a few weeks later and watch them all back to back.

      Without a functional tv_grab script I simply wouldn't bother. Thankfully the tv_grab_au script does seem to work pretty well. I see tv_grab_nz in the xmltv install. Does it not work for you?

    15. Re:Does this really apply? by stanbrown · · Score: 1

      And it's a locked in peice of hardware. At least starting with the Series 2 units. They have a PROM checksum that checks all teh critical bits on boot up, and will not allow any mods :-( I think this is a serious abuse of teh GPL, myself!

      --
      nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
    16. Re:Does this really apply? by enrico_suave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "To me, if TiVo's the best, and still cheaper (at least for the first couple of years of use), why use homebrew except for bragging rights?"

      well, as I've stated on many occasions... building your own PVR isn't for everybody. It helps if you like to tinker with PCs/software/etc... not everyone likes to DIY but I do =)

      that said, I love my Tivo.. but it isn't everything. I kinda wish I got a replayTV as Tivo's home media options (which you pay more to network your Tivo to your PC, sorta) is a joke.

      A tivo with lifetime subscription is 110 (after rebate 40 hours) + 300... 410

      I'd much rather pay that in hardware/toys to play with (you do know you are on slashdot, right? =)) and then some to have MORE functionality (like weather modules, RSS feeds, MAME, mp3's, divx, and so on....)...

      *shrug* again DIY PVr is not for everyone, but it's not a meritless endeavor. And yes, you may end up spending more, especially if you want it small/sexy looking, than you'd ever pay for a Tivo+subscription...

      I must say in the short time I've been running the site, the advancements in the software has been really amazing... SageTV (not free beer/speech... cue boo's and hisses) works awesome with my pvr350 and approaches tivo-esque look/feel/usability...

      YMMV,

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    17. Re:Does this really apply? by ehintz · · Score: 4, Informative
      I am more trusting of a freely available software package rather than a service. What happens if Tivo goes bankrupt or ups the price or whatever?

      If a website changes and code needs to be fixed the people running the software will do so and get the changes down to the endusers quickly.

      Even if it doesn't work anymore at least I wouldn't be losing money like I would if Tivo died.

      If Tivo goes belly up, just roll your own data (or more likely join a community of people who do). The Tivo guide data format is hardly a secret these days. The service actually exists in the UK and US, but there are thriving widly active Tivo communities in AU and Canada. I've been running a service emulator for New Zealand since April, and before that we (NZ) were all manually loading guide data. So if Tivo Inc. goes belly up, those of you in the US will surely band together quickly and no doubt have a solid system running in no time flat... The Aussies have a really nice setup, with seemingly very reliable guide data and the like, and the numbers in the states eclipse AU by several orders of magnitude.
      --
      ehintz
    18. Re:Does this really apply? by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      I agree. If I wanted a seperate unit, I'd go Tivo. It's just more convenient.

      However, I bought a TV Tuner card, and Snapstream for my main Windows box.I split the coax and ran it to my desktop. It's great if I need to record something, and I can archive stuff to DVD if I really like it.

      I've started to ween myself off Windows, and start using my Powerbook for most things. So I figured I might as well put my Windows PC to good use. I rarely play games anymore (other than Thief III), so it just seemed like to best solution.

      All-in-all, it works great. And since my powerbook has a DVD burner, I can burn DVD's of the stuff I really like.

      But there's no way in hell I'd spend the time or money on a seperate PC to just sit there and act like a Tivo.

    19. Re:Does this really apply? by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

      mechanism for scraping NZ TV websites for program listings...time to create, and more importantly maintain, such a method.

      Do you have any way of contacting other Kiwis who want to use MythTV? Even if it is 10 guys, or 5, the task may be easily parallelizable, and you are looking at a small faction of the work. Hell, the back room technician at the TV station may be able to help some if NZ has the hometown flavor it appears to have--to outsiders, at least (by posting a database-friendly text file of listings on the TV website, for example).

      If nothing else you could put up a simple webpage or sourceforge project, and see if anyone googles in.

      If Tivo or other PVR suppliers don't cater to the NZ market & you are ambitious, make a business of it and sell hardware/software/service combinations, through the local satellite TV shops, perhaps.

    20. Re:Does this really apply? by pleb1024 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm a mythtv user in NZ. Have been using for the last 4 months as a PVR, no problems (after six months of getting everything working correctly)

      I have a working tv_grab_nz which scrapes off the TV1,TV2 + Sky Web sites. Works about 95% of the time at the moment.

      I planning a rewrite of it to make it a lot more reliable, and fix up some of the quirks that trip up mythtv a little.

      Once working to my liking, I plan on submiting up to the tv_grab people, so us NZ's are left behind in the stone age.

    21. Re:Does this really apply? by batzo · · Score: 1

      Actually, tv_grab_nz works just fine here in NZ (well, at least for the last 3 months or so) (although you sometimes don't get more than a day ahead on C4)

      I'm using freevo, but I believe that MythTV uses xmltv also.

    22. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thief fan! Thief fan! YAY!!

    23. Re:Does this really apply? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Someone pleas convince me I'm wrong."

      Let's say I sell brooms by running commercials on soap operas. Scratch that, I'm selling soap. And let's say that I learn that 20% of the viewers watch tv on a PVR. I realize that PVRs allow consumers to skip commercials, so that sucks for me. But I'd still rather that they be skipping *my* commercials than my competitors. I know that once in a while, they'll see my product for a second. And by making the ad entertaining, I can still improve my odds.

      The name of the game is broadcasting. The broader the better. They need to make the program listings accessible. IMO, they should consider sending it out in XML over usenet.

    24. Re:Does this really apply? by kevinbarsby · · Score: 1

      I'm in NZ, and I've just pieced together my myth box.

      I'm looking at getting Sky, does the tv_grab_nz "just work" for the Sky listings?

      I've been looking at some posts here that seem to have had trouble in NZ.

    25. Re:Does this really apply? by Snad · · Score: 1

      I have a working tv_grab_nz which scrapes off the TV1,TV2 + Sky Web sites. Works about 95% of the time at the moment.

      Last time I tried it only worked (sometimes) for TV2 and not anything else - hence my frustration.

      Don't suppose there's any chance of getting PrimeTV added to the list? ;)

      I might give it another three or four months and revisit the whole MythTV option then.

      Cheers.

    26. Re:Does this really apply? by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Aside from the Zap2it stuff posted here, there's at least one company that will sell you a subscription for the listings. $4 a month or something like that.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    27. Re:Does this really apply? by airjrdn · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of 4.99 per month regardless of how many DirecTivo units I have?

      Money must be tighter for you than than it is for me. I'll gladly keep paying the five bucks a month.

    28. Re:Does this really apply? by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      MythTV doesn't tell a third party what you've been watching, for one thing.

    29. Re:Does this really apply? by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Uh, again - me, sure. My mother, no way in hell would she do that.

      So why don't you (for example) charge your mother 1/5 of what the TiVo subscription fees to maintain her xmltv software via ssh.

      That sort of business model worked for CodeWeavers.

    30. Re:Does this really apply? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Informative
      I'm using freevo, but I believe that MythTV uses xmltv also.

      I wish more companies would follow Zap2It's lead here in the U.S. and provide listings as direct downloads. You can go into labs.zap2it.com and prepare your North American listings and when you go to connect you just download the channels you setup. It's 100 times better than screen scraping the old web site and all you have to do is fill out a 2 or 3 question survey every 3 months to maintain your free membership. All my problems with MythTV in the past were not really mythtv, but xmltv breaking. All zap2it had to do was change a single character in their website display and xmltv would break requiring a new release which usually meant a new release of MythTV was needed. It was fscking ridiculous. As a North American user I'm glad I won't have to worry about that anymore.

    31. Re:Does this really apply? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      So why don't you (for example) charge your mother 1/5 of what the TiVo subscription fees to maintain her xmltv software via ssh.

      I'd charge his mother 1/10th of what the TiVo subscription is and just fill out the silly survey for her every 3 months. It's 3 friggin questions the last time I took it. It literally took me 5 seconds and I was set until September. Why would they charge for the data? Cheapass people would just go back to screen scraping which uses 100 times more bandwidth than this does. It's in their best interest to provide it free as long as they provide the listings via the web free at all.

    32. Re:Does this really apply? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      MythTV doesn't tell a third party what you've been watching, for one thing.

      TiVo doesn't, either. Next troll, please...

      (FWIW, I use both.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    33. Re:Does this really apply? by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "I think this is a serious abuse of teh GPL, myself!"

      Tivo is in compliance with the GPL. You can download the source code at tivo.com/linux. They'll even send you a CD with the source (for the nominal cost of shipping). *And* they refer to Linux as Gnu/Linux on their site!

    34. Re:Does this really apply? by ovoskeuiks · · Score: 1

      I'm using tv_grab_nz xmltv grabber with freevo and it seems to get 1,2,3 C4 and prime without too many hicups

    35. Re:Does this really apply? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at pytvgrab?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    36. Re:Does this really apply? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Well, Tivo could provide the data services and get income from users of various hardware platforms, including free ones. Selling everything in one package is convenient, but getting money while someone else pays for the hardware also can help with the cash flow.

    37. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I find that I watch some commercials more than others, even with a PVR, just because they're funny/cool/etc.

      I actually think that being able to weed out the crap is cool, but sometimes, you catch one bit of a commercial and you skip back, usually saying 'What the-'

      Being able to watch the *commercials* I want to watch roxors, too. Maybe I want to analyze the Spiderman 2 commercial somewhat, but don't want to get on the 'net.

      Consumer choice kicks ass.

    38. Re:Does this really apply? by rasjani · · Score: 1

      But you know, there's few countries out there that does not have service like tivo. And guess what, we *have* to use these DIY things just because of that! Aint that amazing!

      --
      yush
    39. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone seen the DVR's on the cable boxes?? SA makes a VERY nice "Explorer 8000 DVR" that is awesome, I have been playing with it for the last few days. I wonder if the BIG players will squeeze out these Linux "do it yourself" dvr's. any thoughts??

    40. Re:Does this really apply? by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK, and have been using the TV listings provided by bleb.org for a while now.

      They (he) too provides XML files for download, which results in much faster transfers since there's no extraneous stuff to download, and you don't have to do complicated parsing on it either.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    41. Re:Does this really apply? by Ath · · Score: 1
      It occurs to me that trying to use one of these alternatives will work great until the automated TV listing parser stops working due to a moved web page or some other problem.

      I can only speak to this point for MythTV, which I use. Starting in the 0.14 development tree and now integrated in the current 0.15 release, MythTV now supports the DataDirect capability where you can register with Zap2It and get an official download of the tv lists.

      So MythTV no longer relies on the screen-scraper method of reformatting the tv listings from Zap2It into XMLTV format. Even in the past, I always kept the tv listing grabber updated. It was maintained pretty well and fixed quickly after being broken.

      Zap2It only requires you to periodically fill out questionnaires to keep your account active. Of course, they could always change this but I consider this a minor risk.

      As to your point about your mother, I never heard anyone recommend certain PVR solutions to common end users. But a couple of entries in the crontab would allow me to put such a box at my mother's fingertips and she would do just fine with it.

    42. Re:Does this really apply? by Ath · · Score: 4, Interesting
      To me, if TiVo's the best, and still cheaper (at least for the first couple of years of use), why use homebrew except for bragging rights?

      Here's one reason: I live in Europe but have a remote MythTV box setup in the USA. I remotely control it and download whatever I record. I cannot do that with a TiVo.

      A second reason is that some PVRs have additional functions built in. MythTV has add-ons for DVDs, music, weather, web browsing, videogame emulation, photos, etc.

      TiVo is great. I love it. But for some, it may not do everything they want. For that, there is MythTV! Of course, it's not for the technically phobic people...

    43. Re:Does this really apply? by pleb1024 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry, should have been clearer in my original post. It has the ability to scrape any channel which has it's listing on http://www.skytv.co.nz/index.cfm?pageid=449 So can pick up practically anything shown on Sky Digital. Of course TVNZ doesn't allow it's listings to be shown on Sky's web page, so it goes to the TVNZ website for those.

      Side note: Appears there is some issue with the TV3/C4 listings on Sky at the moment, as the website isn't showing anything one the guide 8-(. I might have to look at scaping either Tv3's website or TelstraClear's to get reliable listings for those 2.

    44. Re:Does this really apply? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They have also said in their forums that it will remain free, your only obligation is to fill out a survey every three months to continue the subscription.

      I highly doubt it. and is one of the major reasons I gave up and abandoned my MythTV box for a replayTV box. It took me 3 days to find a working "subscription code" for the zap2it.com page and finally found one not with mythtv's forums but in the XMLTV user mailing list. the whole thing leaves a really bad taste in my mouth coupled with the fact that it becomes a maintaince fight getting everything working well. Besides XMLTV's US data scraper has also changed to that data source...

      My three requirements for a PVR, that drove me to mythtv was Ability to extract the mpeg's, upload my mpegs, and no subscription fees.

      I can see enough into the future to know that zap2it will certianly start charging fees by the end of this year. It's not worth the fight. I had spend at least 1 weekend a month updating xmltv every time the guide data breaks as well as other "updates" to the myth platform.

      I'm switching to a replayTV and the assorted software that make it really stinking easy to do what I want sans the free guide data..

      so yes, $13.00 a month is worth me not having to screw with it, and $100.00 for the replayTV new cant be even touched by any of the linux PVR's.

      I look at my $13.00 monthy bill as a "dont have to screw with it" payment.

      Dont get me wrong, MythTV is the best linux PVR out there... 3 times faster than freevo (I tried for months to get freevo to work smoothly and fast.) and really easy to get going if you follow the docs...

      but the guide data is going to be the death of them all, zap2it is not going to keep giving out free data forever.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    45. Re:Does this really apply? by Conaz · · Score: 1

      No longer an issue for US listings. Zap2It now delivers that content directly as an XML file. Of course you have to sign up for it (free currently) so there is speculation that eventually they may charge for the listing.

    46. Re:Does this really apply? by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      if somebody completely wrote and gpl'd a tivo like service, they could have an autoupdate feature - that way the outages would be short.

      maybe also use multiple websites to get the TV listings - that way if one goes down, there are backups. redundancy is your friend (unless your job is going to india)

    47. Re:Does this really apply? by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      XMLTV basically snags listings from internet websites. As long as TitanTV, TVGuide, et al show you TV listings on the internet, XMLTV will be able to grab them. Web pages do change and new XMLTV versions are released to change with them. It's one line to upgrade XMLTV and about a 35 second download.

      Actually, MythTV just changed their default listing backend. Now, they default to a datadirect service that requires a free (renewable) subscription. Of course, you can still use XMLTV if you want to do the leg work but this new service seems faster and appears to be more robust.

      I understand your concerns about TV listing capabilities going away as that's one of the main draws of TiVo but I think your concerns are unfounded... and listing services are actually expanding.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    48. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFP! Duh you moron he said he tried that code and it does not work... I know this, I got the "code expired" message last night when I tried to "register".

      I also had to use a code from xmltv to get the registration to work, but mine was from xmltv's docs.

      Why dont you farking read the damned post first before you go ranting you complete and total braindead moron.

      the registration code on MYTHTV's website and in the docs (and in the wiki) DOES NOT WORK....

      unless someone updated it in the middle of last night it is a fricking DEAD CODE.

      sheesh, I am sick of these know nothing assholes like you that dont read the whole fricking post before you go off ranting.... cripes I met small stumps smarter than you.

      Although, I need to investigate if what he is talking about works under linux too...

      I also may drop myth for a replaytv if I can pull the video to my linux box.

    49. Re:Does this really apply? by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      Doesn't it?

      Here's a quote:

      So what information does TiVo collect about its viewers? The company can indeed tell what has been watched on a particular TiVo box, down to the second, including the number of times a moment was rewound and played again, or a commercial was skipped.
    50. Re:Does this really apply? by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm running MythTV 0.15 with the new Zap2It code - *much* better than the old tv_grab_na way of doing things. I really wouldn't have too much of a problem if Zap2It decided to charge a *reasonable* monthly fee, on the order of $5.00 or so per month. It still beats having a unit that phones home with all your viewing habits - I find it ludicrous that TiVo expects people to pay a monthly fee for listings while the company gets free viewing data back which is substantially more valuable.

      I also find it incredibly handy to run a Myth front-end on other machines so as to be able to watch TV/recordings where I don't have cable drops or another TV.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    51. Re:Does this really apply? by clnelson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think you just proved his point ... that losing the the listings is not a big deal for a roll your own PVR system. And in fact might be easier for the Linux PVR community that is already doing so than the TiVo crowd if they lose their service. In either case, though, the solution is fairly straightforward.

    52. Re:Does this really apply? by Jonathan_S · · Score: 2, Informative
      I kinda wish I got a replayTV as Tivo's home media options (which you pay more to network your Tivo to your PC, sorta) is a joke.
      Actually, as of today TiVo now includes their home media option free with your normal TiVo subscription.

      Also, they now provide a multiunit discount, after the first TiVo additional units are half price for monthly subscriptions.
    53. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that Zip2it won't be free for ever, but what difference does that make to you? You're already paying $13/month for replay. Why wouldn't you consider just paying $13/month to zap2it.

      The advantage of MythTV over Replay is that you can save programs for long term (ie Rip all your DVDs to MythTV for a video on Demand, or record PayPerview movies). MythTV also supports multiple tuners, so its possible to record more that one program at a time.

    54. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have thalisemia, a rare blood disease. I have to pay for blood tests that draw 5000x more blood then is needed. The rest of the blood is sold at a tidy profit to research companies. I know how you feel about paying for a company to sell your data.

    55. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude,

      A weekend per month? I would've punted, too.

      I'm in marketing (sorta, but certainly not in hardware software development), and I got my myth box up and running. I'm not even using one of the distros, just the apt-rpm packages. I went months w/o fiddling w/ xmltv (until they changed to the data direct service here in the US) or anything else on the software side. I brought the machine down once in about 3 months to install another 200GB drive (hey, it was $70--worth a little downtime, if you ask me).

      I'm not saying it's cheaper than TiVo/Replay or that it requires less care and feeding, but it isn't too bad. Plus, the wife and kids like it. If my wife were on her own, would she set it up? No. But, she probably could.

      Am I worried about Zap2It charging for Data Direct? Yes. Would I pay $13/month for it? No. That's enough to buy an HDTV card and then some every year!

      In short, it ain't bad. My lessons learned: 1. RTFM or use a distro. 2. Use well-supported hardware. 3. Think about which crap you can avoid by finding a simpler solution (e.g. IR keyboard and learning remote instead of LIRC).

    56. Re:Does this really apply? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Dave Letterman has enough money to hire a kid to build him 10 Linux-based PVR's, buy all the best hardware, set up all the $500 remote controls correctly on every unit, network them all via high-speed wireless or wired, or even fiber, communicate with each other over any open 802.11b access point they might find (that's for the one in the limo) and to put in enough receivers and capture cards to record every TV show in multiple countries while sharing his 2000* DVD's that have been ripped to the hard disk(s) to every unit for his viewing pleasure and still not care how much it costs.

      Why would he care? ;-)

      * made up number

      --
      +++OK ATH
    57. Re:Does this really apply? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      The funny part is I used all "well supported hardware" but I went through 3 PVR-250 cards all of which worked perfectly in a windows box and all exibited wierd behaivoir under myth/linux. vertical lines at random times in the video, etc... most of which other also had problems with on the mythtv-users mailing list and the ivtv-users mailing lists. I started aith a PVR350 for the tv out and bailed on that for a scan converter as it was much less painful and the reccomended video card is so hard to find in my parts that it was not an option.

      XMLTV had to change their tv_grab_na several times in the past year because of zap2it.com changes most of the time was in the beginning of this year (Oh and last fall also.. I forgot about those..)

      my upgrade from 0.13 to 0.14 hosed the whole system to the point that I rebuilt from scratch back to 0.13 and stayed there until I was hoping that 0.15 would be a clean upgrade/install....

      RTFM is not enough, following the install guide in order and exactly will get a mythbox up and running great.... it's at least 500 times easier than freevo.

      I still tell everyone I know that if they really want to build their own PVR then linux + mythtv is the only real option.

      but it is not an appliance that you just use and forget about... it does require some maintaince but that is mostly because it is still really late alpha/early beta software.

      I bailed because I finally got to the point of that $13.00 a month is cheap compared to my annoyances and the simple fact that I can export to a SVCD at least 300 times faster with my replaytv+dvarchive+rtvtools than with mythtv+nuvexport.

      I export at least 3 shows in the afternoon and get them burned to DVD when I get home to check my email. my mythbox I was limited to exporting 1 a night as the transcode+filtering took a minimum of 5 hours compared to the 3 in a 1 hour timeframe including the burning to DVD.... the myth export does not include burning to dvd.

      I hope that in a year someone finds a different guide source than zap2it, or better yet multiple guide data sources.

      Or hopefully a company will get a clue and sell a xml gude stream for $3.00 a month and make a killing off of all the PVR projects.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    58. Re:Does this really apply? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The advantage of MythTV over Replay is that you can save programs for long term (ie Rip all your DVDs to MythTV for a video on Demand, or record PayPerview movies). MythTV also supports multiple tuners, so its possible to record more that one program at a time.

      I do this with my replayTV...

      search google for dvarchive..
      adn multiple replaytv boxes communicate on the network so you can watch recording on box 3 from box 1

    59. Re:Does this really apply? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
      My point about David Letterman - - he owns and uses a TiVo and talks about it on air often. That makes him a self-appointed spokesman.

      I can't find any information on the web where Letterman has a marketing deal directly with TiVo, bet even so... by speaking about it as much as he does, that's a lot of good press. If he had a quarter-million dollar custom job as you describe, it would probably get talked about.

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  3. Schedules by andyrut · · Score: 3, Funny

    One of the things that makes TiVO so great is that it knows what television programs are on by downloading a schedule. With a free alternative, will some free service offer updated schedules so the devices know what's on, or will "homebrew" PVR users have to program it manually like a VCR?

    Also, given past incidents involving competing products with similar names, the makers of Freevo might be "linspired" to avoid a name so similar to TiVO.

    1. Re:Schedules by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could parse up tvguide.com or something along those lines. Of course the system would probably break every time TV Guide changed its layout.

    2. Re:Schedules by elbarsal · · Score: 2, Informative

      will "homebrew" PVR users have to program it manually like a VCR?


      For those who haven't looked more closely, MythTV uses a web listing service (I believe Zap2it) to get its listings. It really wouldn't be very useful if it had to be manually programmed, would it?

    3. Re:Schedules by eeg3 · · Score: 1

      "will some free service offer updated schedules so the devices know what's on"

      TVGuide.com offers free listings. Seems like a script to parse that web page and put it into something the PVR can use wouldn't be rocket science. Of course, there is the aspect that TVGuide.com requires a registration, but that could be worked out fairly easily.

    4. Re:Schedules by Nyder · · Score: 1
      I have a Hauppauge WinTV PVR (unfortuntely it's not the mass produced 250 that works with more 3rd party software, though I found some other drivers that worked with 3rd party software), and it has free tv listings that I just click on and it records it automatticly. TitanTV was the name of the service, which is free.

      TitanTV

      --
      Be seeing you...
  4. Just you wait... by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the front page of www.byopvr.com: "I'm very sorry that our modest hosting buckled under the strain."

    As a result of the CNN/Yahoo article(s), no less. Just wait until they see what Slashdot can do!

    BTW, this is the exact site for me. I've been talking about doing this for a while, and every time I see an article on Slashdot I get a little closer to actually building one. I'm really excited now.

    1. Re:Just you wait... by Mantorp · · Score: 1
      he continues: "I'm a little afraid this article will end up on slashdot then the site will really be toast."

      seems OK though

    2. Re:Just you wait... by garvon · · Score: 1

      I gave in about a month ago and built a mythtv box. I almost never use the tv part but I listen to internet radio stations all of the time now.

  5. Don't forget pcHDTV by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Informative

    Recall that all of these efforts are standard definition television. Despite the nay-sayers, high definition television is indeed a reality, and has Linux support thanks to the HD-2000 card, which I'm happy to report has no support for Windows.

    What a breath of fresh air. Now, back to watching hard-disk recordings of Alias featuring the supremely-cute Jennifer Gartner, who, in high-def, has many supremely-cute freckles.

    1. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

      Ugh. Why must I type her last name as "Gartner" over and over again? I know it's Garner. Sheesh. (Must have something to do with some ancient genetic muscle memory ... or something.)

    2. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Thumbs up to Alias.

      Thumbs down to not having high definition. Comcast doesn't offer it in my area yet - and the few HD broadcasts don't justify buying an HD tuner at this point. So frustrating... and with a 57" HD monitor, too.

      When HD is a reality for me, then I'll care. Not to belittle your complaints, but I'm still bitter that I don't have it. Argh.

    3. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by palutke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      . . . and has Linux support thanks to the HD-2000 [pchdtv.com] card, which I'm happy to report has no support for Windows.

      Why would you be happy to report that? It just hurts their chances of staying in business.

      --
      'I ain't a liar, baby, and I ain't proud I just want what I'm not allowed.' -- Violent Femmes, 36-24-36
    4. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by MayonakaHa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the more companies that focus more on Linux and OSS systems than they do on Windows systems, the more people will be attracted.

      I know you'll probably say that the market for Linux devices is tiny.. and I'll agree with you on that, however, it's growing incrementally every day as more and more people are introduced to it in a friendly way. Working in electronics retail I've come upon many people who want to try Linux but are afraid of it because of horror stories, or someone closeby tries to scare them away by saying "oh it can't do that, I tried it and it was crap". I always get a smile from the look on their face when I say "it can do it now and it's been able to for a few years now. When was the last time you looked at Linux?"

    5. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by WiKKeSH · · Score: 1

      there have been windows solutions long before that card was available.

    6. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      Right but that's not the point. The point was now there are Linux solutions that the developers are dedicated to. Rather than a hacked together driver that loses half it's function because the vendor is Windows only.

    7. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
      I love the picture on the front! THAT makes you appreciate the penguin logo.

      On the down side, I was hoping it was the first video capture card for digital cable. Unforunately, there's still no hint we'll ever see one.

      It doesn't support satellite broadcasts either, the website says. I think this proprietary communication is really starting to hit us. Are you ready to tell your grandchildren about the days when we could capture video in our computers, and didn't have to pay by the minute to use PVR?

    8. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "...which I'm happy to report has no support for Windows."

      And then you're one of the clowns that gets pissed off when you can't use your digital camera in Linux because someone didn't provide you drivers for it. Or maybe you like to bitch about how the Nvidia drivers are shit, but at least they exist.

      Put up or shutup. Personally, I'm really tired of browsing around here and seeing a bunch of Linux zealots going on and on about how X and Y is "sooooo much better" than whatever else (and in turn, it ends up sucking).

      I've got no problem with OSS/etc, but you're the kind of people that are going to keep Linux from ever going anywhere. Oh, and if you actually think Linux has gone somehwere at this point, you might be right -- about 3% right. Nobody cares about how much server market you have, or that your stupid PDA runs Linux -- congratulations. Desktop market is where it's at. Anyways, sorry for deviating away from the topic at hand, but please, take your head out of your ass once in a while.

      People with double standards piss me off.

    9. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid ass. The best way for a product to exist is to find a happy medium. If Microsoft only catered to people running some crappy startup companies hardware, do you think they would have gotten as far as they have? No. Prime example of why Apple hasn't gone anywhere. Ever thought to yourself that if Apple had released OSX (and not just darwin) for x86 and whatnot that they might be back in the game? I sure as hell think so. But they constantly have the arrogance to only support their own hardware, then bitch about how they have such low sales. Well well well, you might be onto something there, captain obvious...

    10. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by JumboMessiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, here's some tuners that will work on Linux.

      First of all, check out this site to get the dvb drivers. For ease of use, they also have a patched kernel tree in CVS you can pull down and compile.

      Second, if you're a non DirectTV satellite customer, you can get HDTV sat streams if your provider conforms to the DVB-S standard (ie not DirectTV). Or, if you're in Europe and your standard cable provider conforms to the DVB-C standard, you're in luck as well. Snap up one of the TechnoTrend cards from here. These have been reported to work with MythTV.

      Now, for us in America and some other select countries, we're out of luck in the cable market.
      We've seemed to create another standard called OpenCable that the big boys like Time Warner are using.

      As of right now there are no OpenCable cards available for Windows or Linux. The best we can do is OTA ATSC...

    11. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It just hurts their chances of staying in business.

      Maybe, maybe not. I think Linux market penetration is approaching the point where vendors can maintain a viable Linux-only business. The advantage to supporting *only* Linux and not Windows is that they have a chance to gain Linux market mindshare and recognition as *the* Linux solution. Basically, they're betting that it's better to be the default option of a small market, rather than just another also-ran in a much larger market.

      Is their strategy a good one? Only time will tell. I do think, however, that they've picked a very good technology to try it with. Using your PC as a PVR is a fairly geeky thing to do, given the existence of dedicated, relatively inexpensive devices like TiVo, and running Linux on your PC is also a fairly geeky thing to do. It seems likely that a much higher percentage of Linux users than Windows users would be interested in such technology. The absolute number of Windows PVR on PC users is larger, I'm sure, but the competition for those users is tougher. It's entirely possible that nearly 100% of the Linux market is actually more cards than 10% or whatever of the Windows market.

      Time will tell, of course.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    12. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by tlianza · · Score: 1
      Thumbs down to not having high definition. Comcast doesn't offer it in my area yet - and the few HD broadcasts don't justify buying an HD tuner at this point.

      Incidentally, even if Comcast did offer it, that wouldn't buy you anything unless you used their PVR (which may come long after HDTV to your area).

      They are only now coming out with tuner cards that will work with the type of encoding used by HD streams over cable (QAM). As far as I know there is *no* PVR software available for those cards yet.

      As a matter of fact, I can't think of *any* PVR software that supports cards which use even OTA HD signals (including Media Center) *except* MythTV and the pchdtv card on Linux.

      The HD cards that Windows supports may have some rudimentary software, but by no means a complete PVR/HTPC system. So, Linux has the advantage here for now (which is one of the primary reasons I chose MythTV over the windows counterparts).

    13. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Sorry, if it doesn't support Windows, I won't buy it. I would have bought it in a jiffy if it supported both Linux AND Windows.

      I'm not getting locked into EITHER platform here. I'd prefer a compromise. Nearly every other piece of hardware I own I specifically buy such that it is cross-platform, I am not about to change that.

      If the pcHDTV folks are too smug to bother supporting Windows, I'll continue being to smug to support their Linux-only product.

    14. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Vengeful+weenie · · Score: 1
      According to their FAQ: no cable support, only NTSC support (ok for me), RH9.0 support is broken and all of the PVR application support is "under development."

      For $300.00 USD? -- I think I'll wait a tad.

    15. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you like to bitch about how the Nvidia drivers are shit, but at least they exist.

      Given that I can't use an Nforce2 mobo with the Linux 2.6 kernel and the Nvidia video drivers because it spams the syslog with 1GB of PCI errors a day -- an error that kernel developers "are surprised that NVidia haven't fixed yet", and that has been around since the 2.5 days -- I feel pretty justified in claiming that NVidia give shitty support for their own hardware.

    16. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      The HD cards that Windows supports may have some rudimentary software, but by no means a complete PVR/HTPC system. So, Linux has the advantage here for now (which is one of the primary reasons I chose MythTV over the windows counterparts).

      Do you have one of these cards yet? It appears that there is no support for cable -- it's terrestrial-only. I wonder though -- can it accept an output from your cable box? If so, I'll bet you can set up MythTV to change channels on the cable box with a remote emulator, similar to how ReplayTV works. If you have one, what are your experiences?

      --

      -Turkey

    17. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Care to place a bet on if "all of these efforts" are SD?

      From MythTV's website, under features:
      Preliminary support for DVB cards and the new pcHDTV tuner card.

      I'd go out on a limb and say the pcHDTV card might, just might mind you, be the hd-2000 card you're talking about. Of course this is only a guess based on it being the same farging company.

    18. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...being the same farging company.

      What's a 'farging company'...?

    19. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the movie "Johnny Dangerous" you farging icehole

    20. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You made that up you flying imbecile.

    21. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by bitrot42 · · Score: 1


      >Basically, they're betting that it's better to be the default option of a small market, rather than just another also-ran in a much larger market.

      It also happens to be a market that is much more accustomed to DIY installation and configuration. The support costs for retail Windows TV cards must be pretty steep. Linux folken are much more likely to seek answers in various newsgroups, forums, etc., and never even bother the manufacturer.

      --
      FIXME: Add a sig here
    22. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "Johnny Dangerously" you fargtard!

    23. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 1

      OTA = over the air. And reading up it says Cable uses a different encoding.

      --
      I do security
    24. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Notice that it ships with Xine. If they went the Windows route could integrate with WMP for free? Would you get the PVR functionality that way? Or would they have to pay to use somebody's Windows only software?

      By using Linux they can leverage the free software that is out there to create a complete product (with software) while focusing on what they do best, which is build hardware.

    25. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by swillden · · Score: 1

      Notice that it ships with Xine. If they went the Windows route could integrate with WMP for free?

      Good point, but I learned something interesting the other day: VLC now runs on Windows, so they could integrate with that at no cost.

      The way I found out that VLC runs on Windows is interesting as well: I overheard one of my brothers telling the other one that he should download it, because it's the best DVD player for Windows he's found yet, including the two he's purchased and the three or four that he's pirated.

      That said there are certainly more options, and better supported options, on Linux. And another poster's point that Linux users are easier to support because they tend to rely on one another rather than the manufacturer is a good one as well. And if the manufacturer has an engineer or two keep an eye on the forum, odds are good that they'll almost never need to handle any direct support requests.

      The effect of low software costs, low support costs and low marketing costs (due to community word of mouth) should mean that pcHDTV can be a very lean company. I notice the "About Us" page lists two founders, one a CS and hardware guy, the other a businessman and salesman. What do you want to bet that the two of them are the entire company? I'll bet Jack did the technical work, all the hardware construction is outsourced, and Bert runs the business. They might have one or two employees to handle orders (unless Bert does that), and may occasionally hire a contractor to help with the software -- or not. I notice on the forums that there are many users who appear to be actively involved in enhancing and porting the software, both drivers and xine plugins. For example, there's a long and very technical thread on the port of the driver to Linux 2.6, and it's pretty clear that the users are doing it, not the company. That's the kind of thing you just don't see with Windows products.

      Let's all hope that these factors come together and spell success for this company. Enabling this kind of low-profile entrepreneurship can be nothing but great for the computer industry.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    26. Re:Don't forget pcHDTV by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Beyound that, what a great way to get your users to create your 2.0 product for you, which might be a full-featured, hackable PVR? What does a HDTiVo go for? $999? They could take their product and eventually make a consumer box thanks to the efforts of their users. A two-man outfit competing with the big boys. :)

  6. The saw us comming ... by mmarlett · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... and could do nothing.

    From one of the links that you probably can't get to by now:

    I'm happy to welcome the influx of new visitors who found the site via the "Step aside TiVo, here comes Freevo " Reuters story CNN Money | Yahoo News | etc.

    I'm very sorry that our modest hosting buckled under the strain. Ironically I was in the middle of moving the site to a new dedicated server to better cope with the growing interest in the site, when this hit the fan. We are now on that dedicated server, and it seems to be holding up fine (*knocks on wood*) I'm a little afraid this article will end up on slashdot then the site will really be toast.

    1. Re:The saw us comming ... by enrico_suave · · Score: 5, Informative

      lol... you got me there =)

      I meant to spend the day readying a nice new dedicated server for byopvr. I spent the day hot potato getting the site migrated off the VPS (after the first crushing courtesy of reuters/yahoo news)... then pvrblog graciously linked to the site and that influx of new visitors crushed the new server, before I could even get to optimize it... now this... now this... =)

      The site you see now is slightly pared down to help it limp through the crisis. I didn't really think anyone would post it to /. or if they did it would be to the original news story and somehow that would slow down the effect. *shrug* man was I wrong...

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    2. Re:The saw us comming ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hell, it's good to see the sources posting on directly on ./.

    3. Re:The saw us comming ... by enrico_suave · · Score: 3, Funny

      AC said...>>Hell, it's good to see the sources posting on directly on ./.
      >>>

      Well I'm afraid to go to my site while it's under siege, so I'll just hang out here, me thinks =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  7. HDTV will kill Homebrew PVRs... by HoxBox · · Score: 0, Insightful

    These projects are nice but it looks like homebrew PVRs won't be able to do encoded HDTV signals for a long while. It is really doubtful that DirectTV or Time Warner will release their secret encoding. They will most likely want you to buy HDTV Tivo or the TW equivalent (which is out for selected markets already).

    1. Re:HDTV will kill Homebrew PVRs... by Zapdos · · Score: 4, Informative

      How about today.
      http://www.pchdtv.com/

  8. The next Xbox will be my Beevo by brxndxn · · Score: 0

    I can't wait until Microsoft comes out with the next Xbox.. so I can have a media center pc running linux, recording all my shows, and playing bootleg games for $200 - all while pissing off Microsoft.

    --
    --- We need more Ron Paul!
    1. Re:The next Xbox will be my Beevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and playing bootleg games

      That's real fucking cool asswipe. Thanks for probably stealing one of my games, and no, I don't work for Microsoft.

    2. Re:The next Xbox will be my Beevo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This does not piss off Microsoft.

      In their battle for game consoles they would give them away to make their market share bigger.

      Buying an X-box for any purpose makes their market share look bigger and gives game developers more incentive for programing exclusively for X-box

  9. But I don't watch TV... by howman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is all fine and dandy as a recording medium goes, but I would like to see the technology put to some other uses, like recording my incomming e-mail messages direct to memory stick while skipping the spam.
    For my mom, who works a couple days a week, the ability to record her soap programs, sans interuptions, while she is at work is great. I just find that if you record a 1 hr show without commercials, you get about 40 min of video on average. You spend 40 min watching this and recording another 30 min program, aprox. 22 min of real show. You record another show shile watching your 22 min show and so on... It is like constantly halving a distance... you seem to get somewhere in the beginning but you never reach the end.

    --
    flinging poop since 1969
    1. Re:But I don't watch TV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      This is all fine and dandy as a recording medium goes, but I would like to see the technology put to some other uses, like recording my incomming e-mail messages direct to memory stick while skipping the spam.

      What the hell does this have to do with PVR? You're talking vastly different, entirely unrelated technology.

  10. Advert skipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting


    do any of the the nix PVR's have advert skipping ?
    as in advert skipping where it doesnt record the adverts (as apposed to fast forwarding)

    i know its difficult but usually there are cues in the TV signal itself (bars etc) (like the film companies used to use markers to tell the projectionist when to change reels)

    be a nice challenge, or even for the future using bayes filters to train what is an advert and what isnt

    thoughts ?

    1. Re:Advert skipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      If nothing else, you can probably tell by checking audio levels. During commercials, it will almost always be at the maximum with little variation.

      But it seems MythTV does record the adverts, though it can automatically delete them afterwards.

    2. Re:Advert skipping by whmac33 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't want it to not record the adverts because what if it got it wrong and now your missing part of the program and have no chance to get it back. I don't know if the commercial ones Tivo,Replay are perfect in this regard or not.

    3. Re:Advert skipping by stanbrown · · Score: 4, Informative

      MythTV has post processing ad skiping that works fairly well. Doing it on the fly requires a lot of confideence in your mehcanisim, or you risk skiping parts of the program.

      --
      nix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity. (Dennis Ritchie) ~
    4. Re:Advert skipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, doing it on the fly just flags sections not to play back, it still records it all.

    5. Re:Advert skipping by MrNemesis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Myth's method of doing this seems fairly reliable once you fiddle with it a bit. By default, it looks for blank frames, but I told mine to look for blank frames coinciding with scene changes, which is much more reliable.

      As also mentioned, you canm tell Myth to automatically skip the commercials once you've finished recording.

      It's very cute, and works very well 90% of the time. Ad splash comes up, skip, program restarts.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  11. Actually have by DrWho520 · · Score: 5, Informative

    My roommate and I actually built one of these. Its a great project that provided much anit-Wintel fun. It also provided a great reason to add wirless to the condo.

    Gentoo Linux and an Athlon XP 2400 mate up very nicely. Only thing missing is that WinTV-PVR-350, deffinately the most expensive piece of hardware but well worth the $165+ price tag. We started with FreeVo, but decided on MythTV. It was much more mature a year ago.

    --
    The cancel button is your friend. Do not hesitate to use it.
    1. Re:Actually have by bigbaddumbdog · · Score: 2, Informative

      Screw the PVR350. I have 2 WinTV tuners with an Athlon XP 2400+. They encode 2 channels of MPEG4 at 640x480 and supply upto 3 MythTV frontends all simultaneously and only use 85% of the CPU.

    2. Re:Actually have by bn557 · · Score: 2, Funny

      and I just got both screens and LIRC working :P

      (thus comes the karma burning)

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    3. Re:Actually have by The+Vulture · · Score: 2, Informative

      I wouldn't say screw the PVR-350 quite yet. If you don't have any plans to use the TV-Out part of it (which is somewhat limited right now), the PVR-250 is an excellent card.

      The picture quality on the PVR-250 is much better than a WinTV (bttv card), and it's hardware encoding does take a lot of strain off of the CPU (if you want to use a slower CPU).

      But, for me, the best part is the native MPEG-2 encoding. If I decide to save something that I recorded, I can load it into any MPEG-2 editor, cut out the commercials, and then I have a perfect MPEG-2 file, ready for putting on a DVD.

      -- Joe

    4. Re:Actually have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentoo Linux and an Athlon XP 2400 mate up very nicely. Only thing missing is that WinTV-PVR-350

      Talk about overkill. I'm running Myth with a PVR-350 on a 366 Mhz Celeron. What's the CPU usage? Well, when recording and playing back at the same time CPU usage is 2%. Yes, two percent while watching and recording at the same time.

    5. Re:Actually have by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind tweaking the settings and videofilters a bit the el-cheapo bt8x8 cards can look just as good (some even claim better) than the expensive PVR-2/3xx line.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
    6. Re:Actually have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in Oz, running two VisionTV cards (DVB-T). A PVR-350 costs $499 here, and the VisionTV cards are $175 each. Baring interference, the quality is perfect, since the cards just transfer the Digital TV MPEG2 stream to the disk. Even handles HDTV and AC3 audio fine.

  12. myhtpc by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Though not Linux-based, myHTPC totally rocks.

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  13. Adding a Newbie to Linux and MythTV by bigbaddumbdog · · Score: 1

    Out of the blue my brother who is a pharmacist, with no prior interest in computers, told me he wanted to learn Linux. After a visit to my house and seeing MythTV in action he was even more sold. So, he'll be staying at my house for a couple days in the coming week and we'll build him a new computer with Linux and MythTV. This more than anything gives me faith that Windows may be on the downslide.

    1. Re:Adding a Newbie to Linux and MythTV by MayonakaHa · · Score: 1

      I sincerely wish you good luck. Always makes me happy to see someone spark an interest in Linux. I've been living with my girlfriend for over a year now and slowly she's beginning to get more and more annoyed with Windows and thinking of Linux as an alternative thanks to me. Once I can get all the programs she wants to use running in Linux, or find suitable replacements for, I'm going to try to get her to make the switch.

    2. Re:Adding a Newbie to Linux and MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow! Today's winner of the Useless Post That Serves No Purpose Other Than To Use The Term Linux Award.

      Now that you've attained this dizying height, won't you kill yourself?

    3. Re:Adding a Newbie to Linux and MythTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you considered documenting the experience for grokdoc?

  14. No HD Solution! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
    Too bad there's no HD solution! I went back to TiVo for HD!

    Also, I'd love to see a (legit) DirecTV tuner card for PCs. I wonder if this will ever happen? I presume everyone's too concerned about their content getting ripped off, but it would be awfully handy. DirecTV is the best way to get TV now (with the addition of terrestrial digital--the best bargain in entertainment today!)

    1. Re:No HD Solution! by MayonakaHa · · Score: 2, Informative
      As another poster above provided the link for, here you go.

      My old coworker and friend uses this card and loves it, he just wishes he had better reception to get the HD channels in his area.

    2. Re:No HD Solution! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      Well, I guess there is a solution for OTA HD---now I have to see how well Linux supports it! (Too bad I'm a FreeBSD guy--I really HATE to run Linux.)

      I'm also surprised that the folks here on /. still watch Standard Def! I thought they were ahead of the curve.

    3. Re:No HD Solution! by petsounds · · Score: 1

      Does "ahead of the curve" mean "watching mind-numbing crap on network TV, oh but in glorious high-def?" The only HD worth watching is cable, which is pretty much limited to Showtime and HBO. And that equals a ridiculous monthly cable or satellite bill since they are both premium channels. I've had a HDTV for several years now, but I don't watch any HD content. Believe me, I'd like to, but there's no compelling content that is reasonably priced. The HDTV revolution hasn't happened, and I put that blame squarely on the shoulders of Congress. At least my TV has a very nice built-in line doubler, so it's not a total wash.

  15. I just use Mencoder and tvtime by dancedance · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have tried both freevo and mythtv and found that neither are exactly to my liking. Right now I use mencoder and cron to record any tv shows that I might want to watch later, and tvtime to watch tv live. I know its not a total solution, but thats not what I'm looking for: I don't have the luxury of having an extra pc to be a dedicated pvr(or for that matter a tv), thus I find mencoder does exactly what I want it to do. Are there any others out there that use alternatives to freevo and mythtv to record / watch tv? More specifically, what formats do people record to? I record to divx, does anyone record to mpeg2 and not use either freevo or myth? For anyone that is interested, here is the script I use to record with mencoder.

    1. Re:I just use Mencoder and tvtime by Wicksta · · Score: 1

      Well Freevo uses mencoder out of the box for recording (although you can of course change this) and you can also use tvtime as a plugin to watch tv so I don't understand what you don't like about it. The menus are fast, it has a web server which I use to record stuff when I am at work and you can pretty much use any media recorder/player you like as a plugin. I'm running Freevo on an Athlon 2400+, using a dxr3 card for the tv out and wow, is it so much better than a normal graphics card. The dxr3 support is why I chose Freevo over MythTV. I record with mencoder, playback video files with mplayer and play DVD's with fbxine. I'm very happy with it!

  16. Article is not broad enough by tjasond · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is just not broad enough for people to actually see the differences between the various htpc alternatives. Many of us htpc fans started over a year ago here or here or here . This review, frankly, is inadequate. There are far more issues than meets the eye when making your own htpc, whether myth or xp mce. I'm not advocating either one, I'd just like to remark, after building my own htpc from scratch, that this article tells little to nothing about the pain and suffering of completing this complex task on your own.

    1. Re:Article is not broad enough by PolyDwarf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Amen.
      I figured that Memorial Day weekend was a good weekend to try and get this working.. I had found a handy-dandy step-by-step guide on how to install MythTV on Fedora Core here.. I figured, how hard can it be?

      I was wrong, by far... I never could get LIRC to run under Fedora Core 1, let alone the two instances I need (One for my remote, and the other to control my homemade IR Transmitter to control my digital cable box).

      So, I tried another alternative, that being KnoppMyth, a Knoppix disc customized for MythTV. By far, I've gotten much better results with this. I was able to get the second LIRC instance going too. I don't get the pretty gewgaws out of the box (KDE or Gnome, etc), but it does have the virtue of working.

      For those considering building their own, and aren't Linux gurus, I would suggest going with the "standard" hardware in use (Nvidia video cards for TV Out+Hauppauge PVR250, or a Hauppauge PVR350).. You'll find much more help that way.

    2. Re:Article is not broad enough by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      That's why you buy one from TiVo.

      I've considered buying an Xbox and turning into one of these, but it seems that all this stuff is still pretty flakey to get it working together harmoniously. Then again, it's linux and when does linux ever work harmoniously? The cost also seems high for something that just records television. Then again, people who buy TiVo's apparently swear by them.

      (I use and prefer linux so it'd be like modding down a windows user for bitching about windows)

  17. Mythtv Setup Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you want to learn how to set up mythtv, this is about as complete a guide as I have ever seen:

    www.wilsonet.com/mythtv

    Mad props to Jarod Wilson

    I originally had a fedora core box, but I recently switched it over to gentoo.

    1. Re:Mythtv Setup Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same for me. Jarod's guide is a perfect example of how documentation can really make a difference for a software project. I didn't want to run Fedora, but because of his guide, I did and got a fully functional box with zero fuss. I recently switched over to Gentoo, but I would recommend Fedora and Jarod's guide for anyone getting started with MythTV.

      So much so I made a donation to Jarod a few months back. Money well spent.

    2. Re:Mythtv Setup Guide by truffle · · Score: 1

      this is regarded as the best guide (Jarod's). If you're setting up a new box, first time mythtv user, consider following this guide even if Fedora isn't your favorite system. You can always reinstall later.

      --

      ---
      I support spreading santorum
  18. PVR with digital cable by Openstandards.net · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I thought Myth TV looked awesome. However, I discovered that it can't support digital cable. But, it's not the project's fault, or even a Linux issue. I read that there are currently no PC video capture cards on the consumer market that can support digital TV.

    Is this true? Can we ever expect a card to come out? Are cable and other companies using proprietary protocals? Encryption? Does this fall under the DMCA?

    I just can't see using a PVR that doesn't support digital cable, as most of the channels I watch or would want to record are only available on digital. This includes most of the movie channels.

    1. Re:PVR with digital cable by tjasond · · Score: 4, Informative

      No that's not true. Any tv capture card can support digital cable, as long as its outputs are compatible with the tuner's inputs. The only issue I've seen in relation to a cable box is that you need to have a way to control the IR signal (usually via an IR Imitter) with one remote control. Every digital cable box that I've ever come across has had at least a coax out, if not RCA outs, which should be able to plug directly into most tuner cards. Beyond that, there should be no compatibility issues.

    2. Re:PVR with digital cable by maelstrom · · Score: 1

      It is my understanding that you can connect a remote control device to your MythBox which then knows how to change the channels on your digital cable box. Your digital cable box of course outputs regular coax, otherwise how would your tv be able to display it?

      Not the ideal solution, but it is possible.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    3. Re:PVR with digital cable by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      I dunno about the digital cable card... hypothetically maybe one will come out after they standardized the digital cable boxes (supposedly this summer you'll be able to buy a digital cable box at circuit city and bring it home and your cable company will "support" it's use -- unless i'm confused, which happens)

      The way you deal with this on the homebrew PVR side, is the same way my tivo deals with it. You get your tivo/pc PVR to control the digital cable box and feed the output (svideo/rf coax) to your PVR's/encoders input.

      You can control your digital cable box via IR blasters (which emulate/simulate the remote control you currently use to change your digital cable boxes channels) OR in some cases (notable motorolla boxes) you can use a serial/usb cable to have your PVR control your cable box (which leaves the tuning/unencrypting in the digital cable box)

      *shrug* not a perfect solution, but a plausible/workable one...

      e

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    4. Re:PVR with digital cable by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      Doesn't mythtv support an IR blaster so you can use an external tuner?

      Shoot they're easy to build - I made one with just a 555 chip running at 39KHz (1/3 duty cycle) off one pin of the parallel port.

    5. Re:PVR with digital cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need a cable box to convert digital cable to RF (on coax) or video (composite/svideo). Myth can use either the serial port on the back of many cable boxes or an IR blaster to tune the cable box.

      Program in your cable provider on zap2it's XML datadirect feed, and you can do everything (pause Live, Season Pass, etc., etc.)

    6. Re:PVR with digital cable by Viadd · · Score: 2, Informative

      All cable companies in the US are now required to provide HDTV customers with a firewire-equipped cable box, on request. You can use this to make an HDTV PVR system from a Mac.

    7. Re:PVR with digital cable by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
      This is good news. I didn't read it correctly.

      The bad news is it appears to be true for HDTV output, but that could, and hopefully will change.

      Even this the site for this video card says it doesn't support HDTV through cable or satellite on the FAQ. Terrestial signals don't appeal to me because I haven't watched more than 10 hours of "regular" TV a year in years. What's the point of paying $90/month for digital cable if you still have to watch commercials?

      If the MPAA companies get their way, and put the decryption in the TVs, we may one day not be able to use a video capture card to receive HDTV signals via cable or satellite, even if it becomes available in the near-term. Combine this with the FCC's vision to phase out analog in favor of HD, and video capture cards may only become useful for home made videos.

      But, this is years away. We can still enjoy RCA and coaxial, and HDTV when and if it becomes completely accessible via cable and satellite to video cards, for at least a couple of years. Thanks for the info. I'll definately try MythTV soon.

    8. Re:PVR with digital cable by Openstandards.net · · Score: 1
      correction (runtime error 45 in anchor tag):

      ... Even this the site for this video card says it ...

    9. Re:PVR with digital cable by Riskable · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's currently two ways to use MythTV with digital cable... The first (and most obvious) way is to use an IRBlaster. It's a device that hooks up to your MythTV box that changes the channel on your cable box when you change the channel on MythTV. It slows things down a bit, so it isn't ideal.

      The other way is to get a cable box with a serial port (that works with MythTV). The only one I know off the top of my head is the Motorola DC2000 series. If you ask your cable company for a firewire-equipped box, they're most likely going to give you a DC2000. Also, if you get an HDTV cable box, you're most likely going to get a DC2000.

      If you have the serial port setup, digital cable changes channels fast and works like a charm. A superior solution to the IRBlaster.

      Side note: In this setup you don't even need a TV tuner card. Just some sort of video input to your PC. However, if you do want to get a TV tuner card, make sure you buy a WinTV PVR-250 or a PVR-350. They have built-in MPEG2 encoders which look absolutely beautiful and take quite a load off your CPU.

      --
      -Riskable
      "Those who choose proprietary software will pay for their decision!"
    10. Re:PVR with digital cable by jelle · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, digital cable uses standard MPEG2 transport streams (just like DVB), but uses a proprietary data encryption on top of the transport streams.

      There are no digital cable tuners for PCs, but...

      It does support digital cable, by connecting the s-video and audio out of your digital cable box to your PVR-250, and connecting an infrared transmitter (lirc.org) to your PC that you place in front of the cable box, and then some software configuration.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    11. Re:PVR with digital cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I made one with just a 555 chip running at 39KHz (1/3 duty cycle) off one pin of the parallel port.
      you over-designed it then.

      you just need an IR LED and LIRC, the linux IR driver...

      e.g. here's one way to do it:

      http://losdos.dyndns.org:8080/public/mythtv-info/M ythTV_DISH_IR_LED_TX_via_Modified_LIRC.html

      AC and proud of it

    12. Re:PVR with digital cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly none of the solutions you list work with my Digital cable box (NTL in the UK). The serial port doesn't allow you to change channels, and the remote control / box use IRDA (I believe) to communicate and a normal ir-blaster won't work. Fortunately Tivo sell a special adaptor so I can get that to work, but not found a solution for a MythTV setup ... yet!

    13. Re:PVR with digital cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we ever expect a card to come out?
      no chance in hell.

      I suggest figureing out how to record from VIDEO in and how to send an IR signal to tell your cable box to change channels.

      it's actually very easy and many people using mythtv do this al the time and have been for a year now.

    14. Re:PVR with digital cable by LazyBoy · · Score: 1

      I wish someone would hurry up and do this for linux.
      I want my HD MythTV.

      -troy

      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  19. CNBC predicted the end of Tivo by alen · · Score: 1

    I was watching my daily dose of CNBC after work and they talked about Tivo and the huge drop in their stock price today. Basically it's an easily replicated idea that they big boys are into and they mentioned freevo as a free alternative. They only positive thing going for tivo is the satellite tv deals.

    1. Re:CNBC predicted the end of Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      if CNBC mentioned freevo in the same breath as the end of Tivo it must be true then!

      while it is true that Tivo is under serious new pressure from the big cable companies since they are jumping on the bandwagon with cheaper (in both terms of the word) DVR offerings don't kid yourself into thinking that freevo/mythtv etc are penetrating the potential DVR market enough to even register on TiVo's competitor radar. The VCR will remain as more competition than any linux (or any other OS) freeware DVR for quite some time. It's a hack and would be a part time management job for most people. If you like it as a hobby that's one thing - but it's not the type of hobby that's going to put any companies out of business. That will occur due to a better business model, as the cable companies have (no HW charge, low monthly charges).

      DVR is a really cool idea - and most people who enjoy TV would like one. Also, most people won't pay what TiVo asks for the monthly service let alone $200 or so for the hardware, like I have. Also, most people won't hack their own 'free' box together. Guess who wins here??? The cable co's who commoditize this and just slip a $5 or $10 monthly charge on your bill like they do for remote controls and cable boxes that we take for granted nowadays...

  20. I've looked into this, but... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 2, Informative

    once you buy all of the equipment and get everything installed, it's way more than Tivo would be. still, I don't do Tivo cause I don't want to pay for the service, so a Linux box running as a PVR will be what I do, eventually.

    any news on this front? are the Linux PVR apps more mature featurewise than the monthy pay options?

    I *want* to build one, but time (and money) are my current obstacles.

    CBV

    1. Re:I've looked into this, but... by tukkayoot · · Score: 1
      Looking at MythTV's feature list, it certainly seems to me that a Linux PVR can be more feature-rich than a commercial PVR.

      MythTV seems to have all of the standard PVR bases covered, and have a few nice little cherries on top, like a skinnable interface, and a front end for Atari, NES and SNES emulators.

      Plus there's the fact that your HTPC is an actual PC and can do, even if you aren't inclined to use it much that way. So in terms of software it's a lot more flexible. Also in terms of hardware... one of the things I like about having a HTPC is that you can put a DVD burner in it, or connect a wireless adapter, ect., stuff that I doubt is as easy to do on a TiVo, or if you can do it on a TiVo, I bet you have to pay a premium for it.

      I'm pondering building one of them myself, haven't yet taken the plunge though. My shopping list consists of:

      VIA Epia MII-10000 motherboard
      Morex Venus 669 (or 668) case + power supply
      256 mb DDR266 RAM
      Hauppauge WinTV-PVR-250
      120 GB hard drive
      NEC 8X DVD+RW/-RW drive
      PCMCIA 802.11g adapter
      A serial interface cable for my DirecTV receiver
      and a Radio Shack universal remote

      Last time I checked prices and did the tallying, the total price came to $740-$800, including shipping. Quite a bit more expensive than a TiVo, but also more powerful, and without subscription fees. Seems like a nice deal to me.

    2. Re:I've looked into this, but... by tukkayoot · · Score: 1

      ... but I should add that I was on the MythTV discussion mailing list for a while, and as others have pointed out, setting up one of these things is not a walk in the park. A lot of people seem to have various problems, some of them fairly serious. This is probably inevitable when you think about all the different hardware and software configurations people are using for their HTPC. A lot of people get their HTPCs to work just dandy though. So MythTV would seem less mature if you're going to take possible snafus into consideration.

    3. Re:I've looked into this, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but the guide data will become a pay for service by the end of the year.

      zap2it the american guide data source is trying to say it's free for now but it will certianly become a pay service by the end of this year.

    4. Re:I've looked into this, but... by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

      I guess that's the key, but why doesn't some arise that's akin to CDDB? That way there'd be servers mirrored all over that would be able to share that data freely. Yes, it'd have to change and not just constantly be added to like CDDB, but you'd think someone could figure out how to do this reliably.

      CVB

    5. Re:I've looked into this, but... by LilMikey · · Score: 1

      The reason this hasn't been done yet is probably because it's not needed yet. We have Zap2It, TitanTV, TV Guide, hell even Yahoo has TV listings now. As long as websites and online services are providing listings, XMLTV (at least) will be able to grab them and it doesn't look like things are going to change for the worse any time soon.

      Think about it from the content provider's point of view. They want you to watch therefore they want you to know when what you watch is on. I'd venture to guess most people aren't just sitting in front of the TV watching 'whatever's on' for hours on end anymore.

      --
      LilMikey.com... I'll stop doing it when you sto
  21. Pretty Amazing by bstone · · Score: 1

    The how to start as a newbie page is still up. Whatever server they're using, it seems to have survived the test pretty well. Their comment:

    UPDATE 9:48 --- from the kicking me while I'm down department We're being Slashdot'ed on top of the yahoo/CNN and matt pvrblogs traffic. No mas! No Mas! =) Glad to see the site get so much attention (but in one day?!) so that we can grow our home brew tivo community.

    1. Re:Pretty Amazing by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Funny

      linux/plesk root server II from 1and1.com

      About now wishing I got the tier III =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  22. Linux makes great media box, for lazy bastards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't do much PVR'ing. But I am using a Hauppage PVR-250.

    It's a tuner that encodes it output into MPEG stream. Note that I am using experimental IVTV drivers, so the quality/stability is not garrenteed. But it works for me. The device file that gets used is /dev/video1 The output is mpeg2 streams, bitrates and the tuner I control by ptune-iu.pl perl gui script.

    All in all it's pretty primtive. I am to lazy to setup a real PVR program. Basicly to make a recording you can go like this:
    cat /dev/video1 > show.mpeg

    To play directly from the card:
    mplayer -vo xv -vf pp=lb -framedrop /dev/video1

    I wrote a script called "recorder"
    (script)
    #!/bin/bash
    # Usage: recorder name channel length quality
    # length is in minutes
    echo "16000000 is great 8000000 is good 4000000 is normal for quality."
    echo "name channel length quality"
    ~/bin/ptune.pl --input /dev/video1 --freqtable ntsc-cable-hrc $2 /usr/local/bin/test_ioctl -d /dev/video1 -c bitrate=$4,bitrate_peak=$4

    echo "recorded $1 on channel $2 for $3 minutes at $4 quality at `date`" >> ~/media/recorded/recorded.log

    if lsof |grep /dev/video1
    then
    killall mplayer
    fi

    cat /dev/video1 >> ~/media/recorded/$1 &

    POO=$!

    sleep $3m

    kill $POO
    (end script)

    So I use it to scedual recordings of shows I want to watch. I use tv.yahoo.com for the listings.

    So to record a show I use the at command. It goes like this:
    at 11:25
    recorder randumbshow 32 40 8000000
    ^d

    And that sets the job to run at 11:25 for 40 minutes on channel 32 at medium-high quality.

    That will take like 4gigs of space. To scedual recordings to go everyday at the same time I use "crontab -e" command. Syntax goes like this:

    55 0 * * * $HOME/bin/recorder futurama 51 40 6000000

    That sets it to record everynight at 00:55 (military time) for 40 minutes on channel 51 at medium quality. Simple stuff.

  23. MythTV setup not for the faint of heart by ptelligence · · Score: 3, Informative

    But it's well worth it. I've got one running at home, and it is an amazing device with all free software. You'll want to drop $120 to $150 on a Hauppauge WinTV PVR card with remote and your HD will eventually top 100 gigs if it hasn't already. You're looking at about a gig per half hour that you record. What's cool about my box is that in addition to acting as a PVR, it's also an ssh and samba server and its constantly grabbing 3 or 4 bittorrents. Also it can pause and rewind live tv. I must admit though that I have spent on the order of 30 hours setting it up and just fooling around with it in general. You'll want to be familiar with Linux before you even attempt to set up one of these. If you're looking for an easier way, you may want to try KnoppMyth. It's bootable live CD that installs myth TV. It may require a little tweaking at the end, but it could save you a heck of a lot of time. Of course then you'll realize that there's nothing good on TV anyway but your geeky pride will be stroked.

    1. Re:MythTV setup not for the faint of heart by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also note that you can use MythTV to transcode the programs recorded by the PVR-250 to remove commercial breaks from the file and to use a more efficient encoding, which reduces file size to well under a GB per half hour.

    2. Re:MythTV setup not for the faint of heart by lorcha · · Score: 1
      MythTV setup not for the faint of heart
      apt-get install kde x-window-system mythtv discover
      Don't forget to take your heart medication.
      --
      "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  24. Be Prepared to help the newbies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Big Deal? Why is this constantly brought up? I'm not trolling, but honestly, that's a little snide comment.

    Listen, i'm all for open source, free as in beer, yadda yadda, but please, for the love of god, realize that EVERYONE IS A NEWBIE ONCE. I'm sure Joe SysAdmin Linux user would be more than happy to flex their geek muscle and help people. But doing it in a condescending way is absolutely NOT going to help spread any sort of information, besides what monumental jerks people can be.

    What a better way to piss off your user base by calling them newbies and basically insulting their intelligence from the get go. I can already tell the general tone of these mailing lists, even before I join.

    1. Re:Be Prepared to help the newbies... by ovoskeuiks · · Score: 1

      The Freevo mailing list has been excellent to me and many others. Often helping us with problems that don't really fall under the lists scope The only time I see anyone get called a newbie is when people do it to themselves in that sorry i'm a newb sorta way

  25. Linux PVRs can be a pain! by truffle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some points which pundits may not mention (I'm a MythTV user):
    - Dedicated PVR systems are always cheaper than building your own from parts
    - PVR systems based on old hardware will be slow. It doesn't matter if you throw a hardware encoder/decoder in your Duron 850, it will be slow. You want all the CPU and disk speed you can get. Trust me.
    - Be prepared to spend 40+ hours over the next three months setting up, configuring, debugging your system. Less if you don't care about customizing and tweaking. More if you're less experienced, and want to compile from source, or don't have popular hardware.
    - If you use your Linux box for other things, be aware the system resources mythtv demands may make it slow and chunky.
    - Setting up a MythTV box requires installing lots of stuff. The mythtv software works with LIRC (remote control drivers), iVTV (tuner drivers), and a bunch of stuff I don't remember. This isn't an install one thing and you're done project.

    I enjoy tweaking systems, but I wasn't aware of the amount of time I'd have to put into MythTV. This in no way detracts from the project - it's a great project. Just know you're getting into something that's fairly technical, and requires troubleshooting.

    For the record, PVR 350 + Athlon 1800 + 512 megs/ram on my mythtv box. Debian.

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
    1. Re:Linux PVRs can be a pain! by Spoke · · Score: 3, Interesting
      PVR systems based on old hardware will be slow. It doesn't matter if you throw a hardware encoder/decoder in your Duron 850, it will be slow. You want all the CPU and disk speed you can get. Trust me.
      You must be doing something wrong if you can't get a Duron 850 running well, especially when using a hardware encoder. I'm even tempted to replace it with a Via Eden system so that it uses less power and runs quieter (no more CPU fan!)

      I've got MythTV running great on a Duron 800, 512MB of memory and a 80GB 7200RPM drive with 2MB of cache and 2 PVR250s. Not exactly state of the hard hardware, but it works very well.

      Now, if you were using software encoders, you would then need a lot of CPU power if you wanted to record multiple shows at the same time, especially if you want to record directly to MPEG4 format.

      IMO the following is most important when building a MythTV system (not sure how much applies to other Open Source PVRs):

      A decent amount of memory. 256MB is bare minimum for a combination frontend/backend system. 512MB is good.

      Lots of hard-drive space. I thought that 80GB would be plenty, but every now and then I get a number of shows queued up and fill up the drive. 160GB would be better. The drive doesn't need to be fast, even the slowest drives are fast enough to stream multiple live video streams off of them. 5400 RPM drives suffice if they are big enough. More important is to put the right filesystem where you are storing your recordings. EXT3 is a lot slower than JFS or XFS when it comes to deleting large files, it takes 3-5 seconds on my system to delete multi-gigabyte files. JFS or XFS can delete large files almost instantly.
    2. Re:Linux PVRs can be a pain! by n8twj · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have MythTV running on a VIA EPIA M10000. I only have a 40 gig HD in the mini-itx..... i've even done DVD playback via NFS without much trouble.

      Most certianly took all off 40 hours just to get functional, then another few hours every few days tweakin :)

      73 de n8twj

  26. PVR Distro by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


    I went looking for a "linux PVR distribution" this weekend and couldn't find it. Basically, I was looking for a linux distribution which could be easily installed, work out of the box with standard TV tuner/video out (and ideally, maybe even some sort of IR device) and give me the ability to watch DVDs, stream divx, listen to mp3s, etc.

    Does this exist? It should. It could really work as a sneaky way to get people interested in linux in the home.

    ~jeff

    1. Re:PVR Distro by omega9 · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
    2. Re:PVR Distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you're interested in MythTv and want a distro I would try Knoppmyth http://mysettopbox.tv/knoppmyth.html

    3. Re:PVR Distro by jeffehobbs · · Score: 1


      Thanks!

      ~jeff

    4. Re:PVR Distro by Baseclass · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I've been using Knoppmyth for several months and am extremely happy with the results.

      Although I've dabbled in Linux off and on for several years, I'm hardly proficient. MythTV has renewed my love of Linux in a big way. The Knoppmyth distro proved to be a perfect catalyst. The install is simple and straight forward (do your research on supported hardware first!) Check out the forums at My Settop Box. It's based off Debian (all hail apt-get!). The developers did an outstanding job of setting up the bare essentials and they keep pace with stable MythTV builds. This has everything the commercial PVRs have and much much more. My dad has been a devout ReplayTV user for sometime and was blown away by the freedom MythTV provides. Since it's Linux you are free to do anything your heart desires. My 7 year old has become very proficient at pulling up his favorite Futurama episodes (yes I've taught him well), music, pictures...you name it. He's actually a better navigator than the mrs. :)

      Please note however, it's still under heavy development and shouldn't be attempted if you aren't a geek who enjoys hacking config files or aspiring to learn Linux.

      The only major problem I've experienced is that everyone who sees mine wants me to build them one.

      --
      ^^vv<><>BA
  27. Linux PVR "support" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    All of us who subscribe to the mailing lists be prepared to help out the newbies as Linux PVRs become more mainstream

    Yes, get ready with helpful phrases like "This was just discussed last week! Didn't you search the mailing list?" and "A simple Google search would have turned up..." and "Just recompile your kernel with..."

    1. Re:Linux PVR "support" by john_anderson_ii · · Score: 1

      If you find the Linux community lacking in eagerness to support one too lazy to help themselves, I appologize. I think we all tire of answering the same questions over and over again no matter what the material subject is.

      --
      Be Safe! Sleep with a Marine. Semper Fi!
    2. Re:Linux PVR "support" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, instead of flaming the next newb that asks THAT question for the 100th time why not just ignore them?

  28. not cost effective yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get ReplayTV with lifetime subscription for $300:

    http://www.digitalnetworksna.com/shop/_templates/c at_listRTV.asp?cat=51

    So unless you already have a TV Tuner card with your ready to dedicate to PVR-ing computer and both combined cost less than $300 does it make sense?

    Oh yeah, plus you get a remote with ReplayTV.

    I'm not sure what other competitor's deals are but they must be in the same ballpark, also. Until the cost of the computer+tv tuner card go down, this is not a cost effective solution.

    1. Re:not cost effective yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liar, it's over $400.00 and for refurbed equipment.

      if you are gonna troll at least dont boldly lie.

  29. **sigh** Wake up! by OpenSourceOfAllEvil · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having watched coworkers dodge TiVo monthly fees with their PVR alternatives. I see two things:

    2. Most of them suck, and are just lame me-toos. Who cares if it's free or cheaper, it sucks.

    1. TiVo is hardly a giant. They've already defended their market from Microsoft's PVR entry, once. Why endorse lame alternatives that weaken the viability of company that is on the side of the consumer until a giant can DRM you blind.

    Yeah, yeah. So you got a free alternative you claim is just as awesome. And my Commodore 64 running Geos is still better than a Mac with OS X. Yeah, sure whatever.

    Believe what you want. Go ahead, shoot TiVo in the foot and your consumer rights in the face.

    1. Re:**sigh** Wake up! by john_anderson_ii · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I certaintly can't answer for the rest of the Linux PVR community, but I for one think my Linux PVR works great! I don't watch nearly enough TV to purchase a TiVo, and since my PVR was frankensteined from dead machines I had laying about, it cost me nothing but time. Of course I enjoy configuring and tweaking systems in spare time. :) The sum and substance is: If you like playing around with this kind of stuff, go for it, and enjoy the fringe benifits of having some level of use. If you don't like spending the time, then buy a TiVo and support an emerging company. It's all about choice, and having a choice is just awesome in my opinion.

      --
      Be Safe! Sleep with a Marine. Semper Fi!
    2. Re:**sigh** Wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      WTF are you talking about, and why did the mods mod you up?

      This article is about a do-it-yourself PVR setup, using Linux, free software, and commodity hardware.

      It's fun, and fairly easy, and very usefull.

      TiVo is a good product, but it's not the alpha and the omega of multimedia devices.

    3. Re:**sigh** Wake up! by OpenSourceOfAllEvil · · Score: 1

      I certainly didn't mean to bash any individual's homebrew. Homebrews are as much reward in the baking as in the eating. But when it comes to what horse to back in the PVR race. TiVo is the only contender I'm willing to back.

      Once upon a time there was Replay. Although Replay had some good ideas (many of which are now licensed by TiVo)it did not survive. TiVo may not survive. But if not, what will the alternative be and who will control it?

    4. Re:**sigh** Wake up! by spronk · · Score: 1

      Based on you consumer rights comment I wonder if you wrok for Tivo... Tivo is a lame "me too" compared to MythTV. Myth can do almost everything (wishlists and fristrun only are missing in 15.1) Tivo does in terms of PVR functionality far better then Tivo itself does. PLUS you get a lot more functionality that Tivo doesn't offer. Oh and, "wishlists" are in the current cvs builds of MythTV and will be present in the .16 release. "first run only" recording will be in by .17 (probably by .16).

  30. Windows Media Center Edition? by altek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes, this article is about Linux PVR's, but how do people feel that the popular ones mentioned (Freevo, MythTV) compare to Windows Media Center Edition's PVR functions?

    Don't treat this as a troll (I still expect usual M$ backlash from /.), but I'm really curious. A few things I know already about Media Center:

    1) records in proprietary format (dvr-ms?)
    2) no skipping of commercials (except of course fast-forward)
    3) doesn't require a TV-tuner, can use any vid card with video capture (S-Video, RCA, coax, etc)
    4) generally comes with a remote for all PVR functions and a IR transmitter to actually change your cable box channel
    5) supports other media-ish functions like music, pictures, etc
    6) It's Windows for chrissake

    Please add/subtract/multiply/divide from this list. Just trying to get an idea of how MS's (cruddy) product stacks up to the free competition.

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
  31. Dumb Question by Omega1045 · · Score: 1

    Do any of these projects / products work with digital cable and/or sat? I love the DVR built into my sat (100 hours), but I have already had to delete shows I would like to have kept around a little longer. Since we have gotten into the habit of recording much of the content we watch, so we can watch it when we want to do so, I find myself running into the 100 hour limit.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    1. Re:Dumb Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Do any of these projects / products work with digital cable and/or sat?


      Yeah. I had MythTV working really well with DirecTV. You can control many DirecTV receivers via a serial-to-RJ11 cable (easy to hack in 5 minutes).


      It worked well, and it had many nice features, but in the end my TiVo is still more solid and dependable.

  32. Re:Windows Media Center Edition? by Riskable · · Score: 5, Informative

    All I can answer is in regards to MythTV:

    1) If you use a Tuner card with an MPEG encoder, it records in MPEG2. If you use a Tuner without an MPEG2 encoder, MythTV uses your CPU to record in either RTJPEG or MPEG4 (user configurable). MythTV can transcode these formats to pretty much whatever you want after the recording is done.

    2) MythTV can automatically flag commercials during recording. When it later transcodes the recording, it auto-skips these flagged areas. Works quite well, but can occasionally mess up (mostly it doesn't miss parts of your show, but might record an extraneous commercial or two). It has some newer experimental commercial skip features which I haven't tried yet. It's all user-configurable.

    3) MythTV doesn't require a tuner. You could hook your cable box up to a video input of some sort on your PC and use it with an IRBlaster or serial cable (assuming your cable box can be controlled by a serial port).

    4) If you buy a WinTV PVR card, it comes with a remote and IR interface... These work flawlessly with MythTV. However, I should note that MythTV works with LIRC... So if you get any old IR reciever working with LIRC, it'll work with MythTV. Essentially this means you can use MythTV with just about any remote you can get your hands on.

    5) MythTV supports TV, Videos (auto-metadata lookups which is sweet, checkout the screenshots page), games (MAME, SNES, NES, Linux games, very cool), weather (My favorite module), RSS Newsfeeds, DVDs (which includes a nice ripper), and some others I can't think of off the top of my head right now. There's also a MythPhone module in development that works like Netmeeting/Gnomemeeting (http://www.zen13655.zen.co.uk/mythphone.html).

    6) It's Linux, however, there's hooks and things in the code so that it might run on Windows some day. We'll see.

    MythTV RIGHT NOW is an amazing piece of software, but because it's open-source, it's rapidly developing into something much, much more. Right now it's the PVR leader and I suspect it's going to remain that way for quite some time... A very promising future.

    --
    -Riskable
    "Those who choose proprietary software will pay for their decision!"
  33. You mean like these... by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 1
    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
    1. Re:You mean like these... by mrAgreeable · · Score: 1

      No, the parent is referring to digital cable. These cards decode digital broadcast TV. They all say they require an antenna to receive digital TV. They also have a input for cable TV, but not digital cable. They're careful to say "watch digital TV or cable TV." (But not "watch digital cable TV.")

  34. NOT Re:You mean like these... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't do digital cable. Only digital broadcast over antena, and analog cable tv.

  35. Tivo shares drop 14%... by acm · · Score: 3, Informative
    SAN JOSE, Calif., Jun 08, 2004 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- Shares of TiVo Inc. dropped more than 14 percent Tuesday after DirecTV sold its entire stake in the digital video recorder pioneer, heightening concerns that the satellite TV company would end their relationship.

    The bulk of TiVo's new subscribers last quarter came through its partnership with DirecTV, which offers TiVo service built into some of its television set-top boxes so that users can pause live TV, easily set up recordings and skip past commercials...

    AP Online

  36. GB-PVR free as in beer windows software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    For those using Windows, you may want to check out http://www.gbpvr.com which is a free windows PVR much like MythTV.

    It supports multiple tuners. Hardware decoders like the PVR350, Hauppauge MediaMVP and SigmaDesigns XCard. Its a work in progress, but seems to be making great progress.

    1. Re:GB-PVR free as in beer windows software by another_mr_lizard · · Score: 1

      GB-PVR is great - I use it in conjunction with myHTPC (which is also freeware) and it works like a charm.

      --
      "My parents were strict, but they never pitted me against livestock" - Doug Stanhope
  37. Re:Windows Media Center Edition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are free Windows alternatives. Windows users may want to check out http://www.gbpvr.com which is a free windows PVR much like MythTV.

    It supports multiple tuners and specialist hardware decoders like the PVR350, Hauppauge MediaMVP and SigmaDesigns XCard.

    Its a work in progress, but seems to be making good headway. The guy developing it seems to be very responsive to requests.

  38. Re:Windows Media Center Edition? by xsecrets · · Score: 1

    actually mce does require a tv-tuner and not only that it requires a hardware encoding tv-tuner.

  39. PVR in Australia by technomanceraus · · Score: 0

    I was looking into setting myself up a PVR system but Australian PVR is still in its infancy and there aren't any "officially" syndicated XML program guide feeds. The Australian broadcasters have been holding off from doing this as they want some sort of copy protection scheme setup before they will allow program guides to be syndicated. I'm sure this will mean people living in Australia will probably have to resort to using Windows Media Center instead of Linux based solutions, which i think is a real shame...

    --
    -= Technomancer =-
  40. Torrent is my TIVO alternative. by guidryp · · Score: 1

    My plan this fall for the few shows worth watching is to pick them up on Torrent. I caught the last episodes of Angel and Enterprise this way and decided this was the way to go. I don't even have to remember to record anything. I just pick the episode up when I want to watch.

    Eventually I realize there will be a big witch hunt against evil TV downloaders, but I hope by the time the corporations shut it down, that this model will be available from the networks legitimately.

    Thought I wonder if the weekly fiction series is doomed. The combination of reality crap, TV downloads and DVD boxed TV seasons all contribute to me watching very much less actual broadcast TV.

    I would rather re-watch boxed sets of Farscape, Buffy and B5 than 99.9% of the new content coming out now. What does this mean for the future of fiction TV???

    1. Re:Torrent is my TIVO alternative. by EnglishDude · · Score: 1

      Prob with that idea - subtitles are never included with downloaded programs/movies - the only torrents I can download and enjoy are japanese anime's which already has subtitles. As I'm deaf, I require subtitles to watch TV/films, and the only platform that gurnatees at least some subtitles are TV and DVD's.

  41. Re:Screwing TiVo Screws Linux by TiVoFan · · Score: 1, Informative

    The main argument I hear is that people are afraid that Tivo will go bankrupt. My belief is if they bought a Tivo then Tivo would be less likely to go bankrupt. But this kind of logic is often hard to explain to your average "I deserve to have everything handed to me for free" idiot on Slashdot.

  42. Re:Screwing TiVo Screws Linux by Baseclass · · Score: 3, Insightful
    For one thing Tivo is extremely successful despite the slew of new Linux PVRs on the market. Tivo is but one success story, what's wrong with a little healthy competition.

    The big thing for me is that Tivo is locked down. I wan't my PVR to be 100% customizable and upgradeable at my discretion. I also have a HUGE problem with big brother monitoring what I watch and what I pause (i.e. The Janet Jackson Super bowl halftime show). Tivo may run on Linux, but it's just another greedy corporation. Fuck Tivo and fuck you.

    --
    ^^vv<><>BA
  43. The TiVo double standard by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I've always found it odd at how the hacker community treats TiVo. There is little information or recent work on how to extract the video out of a TiVo box (except for extractstream), and don't even think about bringing it up on TiVo fan forums. In fact, those forums won't allow talk about removing the ads TiVo downloads into itself. I'm surprised at this. I'd think the "it's my hardware, how dare they download ads into it" mentality would win out.

    Apple releases a new DRM scheme for iTunes and people are all over it trying to break it. And Apple is pretty liberal with what you can do with purchased music.

    I just don't get what's so special about TiVo that there isn't more work being done to open the system.

    1. Re:The TiVo double standard by spectecjr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've always found it odd at how the hacker community treats TiVo. There is little information or recent work on how to extract the video out of a TiVo box (except for extractstream), and don't even think about bringing it up on TiVo fan forums. In fact, those forums won't allow talk about removing the ads TiVo downloads into itself. I'm surprised at this. I'd think the "it's my hardware, how dare they download ads into it" mentality would win out.

      The ads that TiVo downloads help support TiVo and keep them up and running.

      They're one of a very small number of companies who are extremely customer focused, and who try to do right by the people who buy their stuff all the time. This needs to be respected and rewarded.

      That, and they unofficially support hacking of their system to add capacity and features.

      The reason the boards don't allow certain topics is so as not to sour that relationship.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:The TiVo double standard by LazyBoy · · Score: 3, Informative
      There is little information or recent work on how to extract the video out of a TiVo box (except for extractstream), and don't even think about bringing it up on TiVo fan forums.
      Some forums are anti-extraction, others aren't. Check out the forums at www.dealdatabase.com
      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

  44. Re:Screwing TiVo Screws Linux by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

    You can opt out of having your TV surfing habits anonymously aggregated with other users.

  45. Re:Windows Media Center Edition? by pimpin+apollo · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've been using Windows Media center edition for about 4 months now and I've got a whole list of complaints.
    1) records in proprietary format (dvr-ms?)

    First, proprietary format. You're right on. I have to install Media Center 9 to even watch something and then the quality is less than stellar in light of its compression ratio. I have noticed the differences between their codec and some others too, but that's not a criticism as much as an observation.

    2) no skipping of commercials (except of course fast-forward)

    Fast forward is fine. The 30 second skip feature's invaluable but auto commercial skipping I think is a legal landmine and it's a bad perception thing. I have no problem hitting that button 4 times in a row fast.

    3) doesn't require a TV-tuner, can use any vid card with video capture (S-Video, RCA, coax, etc)

    I have a tuner card so I don't know about other options. There was some kungfu going on with getting drivers working but once it worked I didn't touch it.

    4) generally comes with a remote for all PVR functions and a IR transmitter to actually change your cable box channel

    Remote works great. It's got a much wider angle than even the tivo remotes. You could get one for myth too though

    5) supports other media-ish functions like music, pictures, etc

    This is really incidental. I guess those are almost order qualifiers at this point. They're so easy there's no excuse to not, but I don't use them.

    6) It's Windows for chrissake

    Yeah, and here's some more complaints that you wouldn't probably ever envision without the joy of testing one.

    There's a database corruption issue about once every 4 days. I'd imagine it follows a poisson distribution, but the corruption will randomly occur. When that happens it will record scheduled shows, but it won't add any new ones or accept changes to any existing ones. Also it can't / won't update guide data or do anything other than record and watch what's there.

    The sound will sometimes be overcome with static. I suppose this could be a video card issue but a restart always fixes the problem. It also seems to retroactively affect shows although I haven't really figured this one out yet.

    Guide data is notoriously unreliable. This may be a function of the ever occuring database corruption which prevents any new data from being added, but either way it's annoying.

    The machine it's running on is a beast compared to the processor that powers a tivo. That and I imagine the drive in it will last another year if I'm lucky.

    Menu ergonomics are awful. Once you're used to it it's not bad, but the 'back' button is relative and it's nearly impossible to switch between 3 different menus without having to return to the root menu to get back to it. The animations are pretty, but that's the best part. They get on your nerves too when they pause for 10 seconds and load the data you're trying to get at. There are a bunch of other menu issues that I've managed to adapt to, but it's not intuitive.

    The menus, when they're not crashing/pausing, are faster than tivo series one, but about on par with the series twos.

    I like it because it gives me a dvr that's working and free (for the moment), however windows is certainly not the 'innovator' in this field. A 2.4+ machine that you have to restart at least every week is hardly competition to a tivo that runs solid for over 2 years.

  46. Free schedule listings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not sure how they do it, but the InteractTV Telly box (Linux-based with open source entertainment OS, EOS) allows schedule parsing without paying for a Tivo service. It even works in Canada where Tivo does not!

    I've also heard that scheduling info is embedded in the cable feeds themselves. Is that true?

    It seems rediculous that Tivo would charge just for the ability to get some schedule info.

  47. Showshifter anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I once started building a MythTV-based PVR, based on a VIA EPIA board and using a WinTV PVR 350. I'm by no means a Linux newbie, but oh my god did this suck. From non-accelerated X drivers for the integrated video to randomly crashing mythtv backends, I've seen it all. After trying with no success for 2 weeks, I formatted the machine, installed Windows and bought a copy of ShowShifter.. I was up and running in ten minutes and it's been working ever since. I'd rather just spend $60 for a working solution then keep on fiddling with MythTV for weeks and missing all my shows in the meantime.

  48. MythTV for Mandrake 10 users... by msimm · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just figured I'd add my reminder for Mandrake users out there, MythTV is part of the Thac's RPM archive. Urpmi setup instructions can be found here rpm.nyvalls.se. Basically, to include the archive in your urpmi database run the following command as root:
    urpmi.addmedia thacs.rpms http://rpm.nyvalls.se/10.0/RPMS with hdlist.cz
    This should make the installation part a snap. Thats for all the nay-sayers out there complaining about the install process. But its still not for the faint of heart. :)
    --
    Quack, quack.
  49. recorded Alias in HiDef once by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On my Hi-Definition Direct TiVo.

    The HDTivo is pretty nice, but ridiculously expensive. $1000, but it has two tuners. I still think you can undercut it with your own hardware by a little bit though, even more as HD tuner cards come down.

    What I can do though is record HD content directly off DirectTV satellite without decompression/recompression, which you cannot do with any home-built PVR.

    Thumbs down to Alias in HD though. It looks like crap next to CSI, it even looks like crap next to Law & Order. And the show isn't as good as either of those two either (which is saying a lot, I'm not a fan of CSI). The good news is I get Alias in 5.1, unlike either of the other shows. Hopefully, as my local programs get their acts together I'll get more stuff in 5.1 over the air.

    Week in, week out, there's no HiDef content that shows off HiDef as well as CBS' golf coverage. Yeah, you may find a better individual program once in a while, but no weekly show can touch it. Yes, it looks so good that I even will watch golf on TV. Unbelievable.

  50. LeadTek Winfast TV2000XP Expert by Borg453b · · Score: 1

    My TV-Tunercard just arrived yesterday, and despite the fact that its slightly offtopic (me using windows and all), I thought I'd take the chance to ask about your thoughts about that card.

    I havent had a TV since moved back to Århus in February, and I live in a small student collective. Focussing a fair bit on design, I've got a huge 21" sony triniton CRT that now doubles as a flat-heater as well as a TV.

    I found the TV-Image to be a bit grainy when run in full screen and I wonder whether a different cable would influence the "reception" quality on a whole.. (I'm on cable though)

    The card does seem to have a lot of nifty features, and it was pretty cheap.

    My main gripes are with the happy-happy-joy-joy software interface. Are there any alternative softwares to those that get delivered with the given TV-Tuner cards?

    --

    - Mad, ingenous - they've both left you puzzled -
  51. freevo best for small boxes? by broeman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought me a VIA EPIA M6000, because it was cheap, and only available M-series at that moment in my country (I wanted a fast delivery for the Easter holiday ;)

    Because it is not the biggest machine in town, I believe its why MythTv failed for me. Everything is fine and all, but when I bought a Hauppage PVR 250 (MPEG-capture) it was extremely choppy in MythTV. When I used mplayer or cat /dev/video0 > file, it went great, so I looked for other alternatives.

    Freevo uses mplayer for LiveTV-playback (I don't use it much, it will freeze my machine eventually, probably because of the ivtv-drivers), and with and "choppyness". Also the capture is done exactly as a good as cat, so I am happy, that I can program to record a show, but of course I would be interested in some of the nice features in MythTV on recording. The other plugins and even more are available on Freevo, and as a typical /etc user, I find the config-file much more intuitive than pressing every channel and feature in MythTVs GUI (also I don't have to install QT for once).

    You might ask, why I didn't tell that to the MythTV dev/user-community (#mythtv and #mythtv-users), but I have never seen a more unfriendly one (eventhough there are good people among them). Its double as many users there, but barely anybody talks/helps eachother. Freevo helped me through some of my stupid actions and questions pretty nicely on #freevo.

    --

    (yes this can be compared with sex)
    1. Re:freevo best for small boxes? by iso · · Score: 1

      Try tvtime for Linux TV viewing. It's got lots of optimizations, and is much more efficient than both MythTV and mplayer for TV playback on my machine.

    2. Re:freevo best for small boxes? by broeman · · Score: 1

      TVTime is great, but it doesn't work with ivtv-drivers (because the cards outputs MPEG). Anyways TVTime can also be used in freevo ;)

      --

      (yes this can be compared with sex)
  52. TiVo *is* a Linux PVR by NekoXP · · Score: 1

    .. making Linux PVR's mainstream already happened. Whacking a PVR package on a
    bog standard PC doesn't make it somehow more accessible to the general public.

  53. Re:Windows Media Center Edition? by anglete · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just wanted to plug my software:

    6) There are not only hooks to windows, but WinMyth exists. That is, there is a windows myth front end written nativly for windows.

    you can also compile mythtv via cygwin in windows, but in my opinion that's not quite as clean.

  54. On Slackware.... by rongage · · Score: 1

    OK - What I want to know is if anyone out there has been successful in getting MythTV (or FreeVo) working successfully under Slackware.

    I've tried (and I am certainly no Linux newbie) and could not get all the dependancies to work/compile/install. I spent the better part of 3 days working on it when I gave up.

    Heck, getting Gnome recompiled is worlds easier than getting either Myth of Freevo to work under Slackware 9.1.

    --
    Ron Gage - Westland, MI
    1. Re:On Slackware.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      All three of the mythvboxes I built are based on slackware 9.1. dep's are easy, follow the doc's and install the SUGESTED versions of the packages from source... do not go looking for a slack package.

      in fact it's easier and more stable under slackware than under redhat. many of the problems that bother many users on the mailing lists do not bother me.

      the problem is trying to get guide data... I dont trust zap2it and their changes to require a login/license.

      I am hoping that xmltv finds out how to scrape other websites for US data...

      that is going to be the death of a linux based pvr... the ability to get guide data...

      we can get guide daya right now.... but I feel that it won't be that way this time next year.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:On Slackware.... by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

      >>
      OK - What I want to know is if anyone out there has been successful in getting MythTV (or FreeVo) working successfully under Slackware.

      I've tried (and I am certainly no Linux newbie) and could not get all the dependancies to work/compile/install. I spent the better part of 3 days working on it when I gave up.
      >>
      well a great user on byopvr site put together a guide for just that.

      Homebrew's guide to installing mythtv on slackware (w/pvr350 support)

      also see this forum post on the subject

      Good luck...

      E.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  55. For those of you wanting to get started... by Demon+of+the+fall · · Score: 2, Informative
    MythTV is really mature nowadays, and thanks to Jarod Wilsons HOWTO (where he goes through the MythTV install and the entire hardware configuring process step-by-step), even a relative Linux newbie (are there any of those around here? :) can get MythTV working in a matter of hours. Highly recommended.

    There are also IRC channels (#mythtv and #mythtv-users on Freenode) and very active and helpful mailing lists to ask for help if you get stuck (at some point or another, you will!).

    --
    Be an elitist - read Slashdot at +4.
    1. Re:For those of you wanting to get started... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " (are there any of those around here? :) "

      Yes, believe it or not, there are still a few of us that just browse and never actually touch. Linux is scary... I fear it'll suck my time away... just like /.!!

  56. have you used both?? by caffeinex36 · · Score: 1

    which one do you like better?!!!??

    TiVo's hardware is far more superior to a MythTV box. anyone who says they can get a MythTV box up and running up to the same capacity of TiVO WITHOUT spending over 1000.00 is crazy. Granted, people already have computers, but the hardware requirements for MythTV compared to the price of a 250$ tivo and EVEN a 300$ lifetime membership (which I know..only covers for the life of the unit) still outweigh the costs of building a MthTV box.

    granted there is the whole "trust" issue as its not "free" software

    1. Re:have you used both?? by WwonderLlama · · Score: 1

      As a point of order, I'm not crazy and I built a MythTV box for under $700. (And quite a box at that!)

      Specs:
      AMD 2200+ ($65)
      512M PC2700 DDR RAM ($70)
      Motherboard ($55)
      -- onboard 6channel sound
      -- onboard Video
      -- onboard LAN
      2x 250GB HDs (.5TB Baby!) ($340 ish)
      Tuner 1 - PVR 250 ($88)
      Tuner 2 - Leadtek WinTV2000xp Deluxe ($45)
      Case w/ Power Supply ($25)

      I can easily store over 280 hours of standard-encoded video. I can edit out commercials, re-encode the video to standard MPEG (2/4) or other formats, or even re-encode to DVD and burn to a disc that's watchable from a standard DVD player. Can TiVo do that?

      I can add more hard drive space and instantly have tons more storage (I still have an open IDE connection as well as 2 SATA channels). I can stream video through the web interface to any PC on my network.

      I've set up xboxen as frontends on my primary TVs; I could easily add diskless PCs instead. I can watch my saved videos or Live TV from any of these places.. Not just one TV.

      I can view and schedule programs via a web interface regardless of where I am. I could be on vacation, visiting my parents, or going to sleep with someone's sister and as long as that sister (parents/vacation spot) has internet access, I can check the MythBox's status, view channel listings, schedule new shows, _everything_.

      Oh, and if the $700 (no subscriptions!) price tag is too high, you can easily scale it back. My machine is actually overpowered for MythTV's needs. A person could _easily_ get by on half the processing power and RAM. Heck, you could probably manage w/ 128Meg of RAM if you really had to. You could drop one of the tuners (I have 2, TiVo has one, right?) And the hard drives.... Well, if you decided to go with an 80Gig (like TiVo?), that wouldn't be a problem.

      So, you could pretty easily cut your investment by at least $350. Go ahead and check my math, but I'm pretty sure that's still not crazy.

      Why not check out http://www.mythtv.org and look at the system requirements and software features before claiming that TiVo is a better value. There are tradeoffs, but for my $$$, I'd rather go with something configurable that doesn't report my viewing habits to someone else.

  57. WARNING: WINDOWS ONLY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what does this have to do with Linux PVR's?

    I prefer to not run the trojan horse known as Windows.

  58. My MythTV setup.... by JeffVolc · · Score: 1

    I've had MythTV running for the last year and just LOVE it. 90%+ of my TV watching is from it. I have it setup as follows:

    Backend (down in the basement) is an AMD 1700/512M ram, a 120G HD for root and misc data, and a 160G HD for MythTV recording. I can record about 120 hours of video (1.3G per hour with current settings). I run dual monitors on this machine so I can watch TV on one screen and do something else on the other.

    The frontend is an AMD 2200/512M ram, a 120G HD. and an old packard bell IR reciever. I have an svideo cable and audio cables connected to the TV in the other room. I can watch recorded shows from either this room or the main TV in the other room.

    With this setup I can watch recordings from three locations (basement, main computer, or main TV).

    The best part is automatic recording of favorite shows. It keeps track of which shows I've seen so it doesn't record ones I've watched unless I tell it to. It's great to sit down and watch four one hour series shows, in order, in three hours after skipping commercials. Commercial skip is either perfect or not worth using depending on the channel. Some shows like Enterprise it's awfull on (dark show) and some shows like Deep Sea Detecives it's perfect.

    Mythweb is a web interface to MythTV. With it I can see whats getting recorded from anywhere I can get a browser. I can add shows to record if someone mentions a special coming or something. Very cool.

    It does take some tinkering to get it running, but that was half the fun for me. Very much worth the effort.

    Jeff

    1. Re:My MythTV setup.... by JeffVolc · · Score: 1

      Oh, one other point...

      I use a PVR250 card so that it does hardware encoding. Picture quality is excellent. I record at 720x480 so that if I want I can copy some shows onto DVD to watch while I'm traveling or whatever.

      Ocassionally I will also re-encode some shows into Divx and watch them on my Dell Axim PocketPC with PocketMVP (great PPC player). I can compress the show down to 70M for a one hour show minus commercials. I can fit four shows on my pocketpc (3 on the 256M CF and one on the 128M SD). It takes about 15 minutes to convert a show using virtualdub. Picture qaulity on the pocketpc is very good. Very fun to take along camping.

      Jeff

  59. Tip from someone that has done it... by evilviper · · Score: 1

    The best advice I can give someone, is not to bother with MythTV at all. The interface is horrific, the guide is poor, the conflict handling is awful, the file-format it uses wastes about 100Xs as much space as it should, you can't play other files without plug-ins that have a completely different interface, etc. My solution is much simpler, and easier than even setting up MythTV...

    Install webvcr+. It will run provide a web-based interface, displaying a TV-guide that you just have to click-on a few times to schedule recordings.

    It would be more LIRC-friendly if there was a GUI browser out there that could be navigated like text-mode LINKS (even GUI links doesn't have the same keyboard nav as it's text-based fore-father). Now, you have to use Mozilla, or some such, and mouseless nav is practically impossible, so make sure you get LIRC's virtual XF86 mouse-control working. Not a problem with the ATI Remote Wonder, since it has a (rather poor, but usable) mouse built-in.

    Then you can tell vebvcr+ to use good old MPlayer to do the recording from your TV-Tuner card (unless you have a hardware encoder, then "dd" works just fine, "cat" doesn't have large-file support sadly). Configure whatever arbitrary parameters you want MPlayer to use.

    Then, the last step is to install a good file-manager... I use "emelfm" myself, and it does the job quite well, but it's not perfect, so you might want to try another simple filemanager. Just use the arrow-keys to go up/down through the list of all your files, and hit OK/Enter to launch one. MPlayer navigation works FAR faster and better than MythTV's, which is a big issue when you are skipping 10 minutes of commercials for every 15 minutes of a TV program.

    Also, I just hit a button to bring-up the context menu, where I can open the file with avidemux2, and edit out the commercials. I found the keyboard bindings to be quite lowsy, so I made a little patch to change them to something more remote-friendly.

    In addition, you just need to whip-up some very basic shell-scripts for anything else you want to do. I have simple scripts that convert my recorded MPEG-2 files to Divx. I have scripts that automatically record a DVD into a CD-sized Divx file, so you only have to type in the name and length. I have scripts that automatically takes the selected files, converts them into an ISO, then transfers them with 'scp' over the network to another machine with a CD-Burner, then records as many copies of the ISO as you want...

    It may sound complex, but it's all quite simple, and doing all this setup work is still FAR easier than getting MythTV setup, and installing the necessary plug-ins. Plus, you have a mutimedia system that can do infinitely more, is easy to add more, new functions to, and is far quicker and simpler to USE than MythTV.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Tip from someone that has done it... by JeffVolc · · Score: 1

      Have you seen MythTV lately? I hope you are not basing your opinion on older releases of MythTV. I think MythTV looks excellent. Especially the new GANT theme. Even in the last year I have seen it get more and more polished.

      Also, they now have priorities for handling conflicts so I can tell it that Trek always wins unless I choose otherwise. I can't think of the last time I couldn't record a show since most shows have repeat times to pick from.

      Jeff

    2. Re:Tip from someone that has done it... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Have you seen MythTV lately? I hope you are not basing your opinion on older releases of MythTV.

      Well, it's been about 2 months, and nothing in the changelog leads me to believe that anything significant has improved. Even if they did solve 50% of the problems (which would probably take years) that still leaves them with dozens of other serious problems, and they are issues I don't even have to think about with my setup.

      Also, they now have priorities for handling conflicts
      Yes, that IS the conflict management system I was refering to when I said how terrible it was.

      I can't think of the last time I couldn't record a show since most shows have repeat times to pick from.

      I know the feeling. However, that only really works with Cable channels. With the big 7 or so broadcast channels, nothing ever repeats, so they can get good at causing conflicts. For instance, Law and Order was running against Kingdom Hospital. Law and Order SVU has been put up against NYPD Blue. You could schedule to record Law and Order repeat episodes on TNT, but then you have to put up with on-screen logos, sounds broadcast over the show, commercials that over-lap the shows, and flatened credits for the previous show that are displayed at the start of the next episodes. Watching anything on TNT is so incredibly painful to the point that I have removed all reference to that channel from my TV Guides, channel line-ups, etc.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Tip from someone that has done it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you're joking. You're comparing slapping a couple mismatched applications and shell scripts together to a complete product like mythtv? And you say easier? In time it takes to write one of the scripts WELL, you could have installed mythtv a couple times over.
      For the linux challenged or just convience, try the KnoppMyth distribution: http://mysettopbox.tv/ .

  60. I'd like to buy one by SWroclawski · · Score: 1

    I love all this do-it-yourself PVR stuff and I tried to build my own two years ago. The hardware just wasn't available in the price and formfactor I wanted.

    Now I'd be interested in buying a pre-made Free PVR that I could just plug in and start hacking on myself. Basically I want a box that comes in a small form factor, low noise, low heat and already has MythTV or Freevo pre-loaded and configured for the hardware.

    Does anyone know if such a thing exists?

  61. Tuner costs the same as a TiVo unit...... by burbs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One thing the author didn't do was list the price of a base-model TiVo machine. For those with a limited income, forking out $199 for a graphics card may not seem as beneficial as paying $199 for an entire unit. They may even be able to scrimp with the monthly fees.

    I have a ReplayTV myself, the base $149 model. I liked the built-in network card and available 3rd party programs that allow me to stream media from my PC to the ReplayTV box, or vice-versa.

    I think it's good that this article showed up to list the alternatives. I really don't understand why TiVo is so popular, especially when you compare the features of it to ReplayTV. But I guess that they've got on hell of a marketing team.

  62. RCA Guide+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I played around with a freevo for a while, but gave up. It was noisy, and ultimately, more expensive, and required lots of work to keep working. Look like that will be better now that xmltv doesn't screen scrape.
    I wonder if anyone has worked out methods of hacking the Guide+ broadcasts. That would be a fun little project if I didn't have already.
    anyway--
    I just bought an RCA Scenium DVR. It's a no subscription DVR, DVD player, mp3 player, jpeg slide show device.
    It uses the free Guide+ screen guides that are broadcast over the PBS stations overnight. It's nice-- though not quite as functional in some regards to Tivo or replay. But very nice, and free for life. RCA has been doing the Guide+ broadcasts for almost ten years, so it should be around a bit more. The other plus- digital audio and Dolby DTS, etc.
    Now, I just need to figure out how I can extract the shows that I've recorded... some folks have already figured out HD upgrades. But extraction is the important piece in the puzzle.

  63. TV tuner cards suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until I can find a tuner card for my PC that doesn't have a noisy tuner, I'm not going to use a PC for a PVR. Every single one of the tuner cards that I've tried now the picture quality from the tuner sucks compared to the output from a cheap VCR tuner. The video quality from my ReplayTV is 1000 times better than my Hauppauge WinTV-D card. Is it really so hard for them to get clean video from one of these tuner cards? Sheesh.

  64. labs.zap2it.com by Otto · · Score: 1

    Hah, I didn't even know they offered this sort of a service now. Very, very cool. I signed up to take a quick look at it, and I'll be setting up something to use this sort of thing, I feel sure.

    For those not in the know, basically this allows you to create an account with Tribune Media Services (the same place where Tivo gets its guide data from) and be able to download TV Guide data in XML format using SOAP and such. Very nice indeed.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  65. No, it doesn't. by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a difference between being able to tell that a box in the 12345 zipcode rewound to watch an ad again, and that Joe User's box rewound to watch an ad again. However, as so many things in life are, it's all about who you trust.

    Tivo has three data collection modes: Opt in, Opt Neutral, Opt Out.

    You can Opt-out by calling up Tivo and asking to Opt-out. They send a command down to the box that sets a flag not to send the data anymore. You can verify this flag has been set on your box by turning on backdoors and looking at the system information screen. Or you can believe me or other people who have opted out and seen this happen for themselves. Your call, who do you trust?

    Opt-Neutral is the default data sending mode, and it sends data that has been scrubbed of any identifying information other than the zipcode. Actually, it hasn't been "scrubbed", it's simply that that data doesn't get put into the log file in the first place in this mode. This has been verified by Tivo hackers, including myself. Again, who do you trust?

    Opt-In sends the tivo serial number in the data file itself, along with adding a whole host of extra info. You can do this by joining http://www.hotline2hollywood.com . This means that all the stuff you watch will be trackable to your box. Not to you personally, mind you. Despite the rumor, there's no camera built into the box behind that "eye" looking thing on the front.

    I'm opted-in. Why? Because I don't give a damn if they know what I watch. Hell, I don't care who knows it. It's not critical to me. Maybe they'll realize that I thumbs down all the reality shows and tend to skip crappy commercials. With any luck, this info will filter its way up to the suits and they'll improve the crap currently on TV. Forlorn hope? Probably. Still, it's nice to think that maybe I can make some kind of difference in the shit that's on TV now.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  66. No, it doesn't by Merk · · Score: 2, Informative

    They've been really open about this since the beginning, i.e. 4 years or more. They collect data on viewing habits, and provide aggregate stats on those viewing habits, but they don't tie them to individual viewers. If you don't even want them to do that, then you can ask them not to, and they won't. Simple, no?

  67. COPY AND PASTE, YOU IDIOT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I GUARANTEE YOU that you made a mistake in typing it in. I switched to 15.1 yesterday, and as such, used that code. I got no such message.

  68. zap2it code by lorcha · · Score: 2, Insightful
    one of the major reasons I gave up and abandoned my MythTV box for a replayTV box. It took me 3 days to find a working "subscription code" for the zap2it.com page and finally found one not with mythtv's forums but in the XMLTV user mailing list.
    Did you ever consider just looking at the Mythtv installation docs? FYI, the code is "ZIYN-DQZO-SBUT". It was all over the mythtv forums and lists, but the easiest place to get it is in the install docs where it belongs.
    I can see enough into the future to know that zap2it will certianly start charging fees by the end of this year.
    Think it'll be less than $13/mo? I would wager that they will not be charging by the end of the year or in the forseeable future. They don't want people to write screen scrapers again 'cuz it's murder on their servers.

    Even if they did charge, can we not just file it away as a "don't have to screw with it" payment?

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  69. Not necessarily cheaper by lorcha · · Score: 1
    If you have to buy all the parts for your homebrew, then tivo is gonna be cheaper. But if you, like many geeks, have a bunch of spare parts lying around, building a myth box is gonna be cheaper.

    My myth box cost me $20 for a video capture card off ebay and $80 for a 160GB drive. The rest I built from crap I had lying around my house.

    Tell me you can get a TiVo+subscription for $100. But to build a myth box out of store-bought parts would prolly run you around... $450-$700 depending on your configuration. Try $120 for a VIA M10000, $40 for a case, $180 for a Hauppage PVR-350, and $80 for your hard disk and you're in business for $420, and that's a machine that has good quality TV-out, 5.1 sound, yet will be quiet, small, and not look out of place in your entertainment center for $420. Add a slimline DVD drive for like $50. If you're going to use multiple tuners and stuff, you're getting in to the more expensive range that I quoted.

    What's tivo cost these days? Like $120 for the box and $300 for the subscription?

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent
  70. PVR-350 not necessary by lorcha · · Score: 1
    Grab yourself a Hauppage 401 on ebay for $20. Works out of the box for both audio and video with bttv drivers.

    Best of luck!

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent