Slashdot Mirror


When Lightning Strikes

ctwxman writes "For most of the United States (sorry West Coast), this is the season for lightning. It is as powerful as it is spectacular to look at. It is destructive too - by itelf or through the hail, straight line winds and tornadoes that often accompany it. As someone who forecasts the weather, I'm often asked about lightning. As you might imagine, there's plenty to see about lightning on the Internet. The conditions necessary and a little bit of the physics behind lightning are explained by Jeff Haby, a meteorologist (one of my professors actually) at Mississippi State University. Once forecasters get a handle on what's going on, they put the word out through the Storm Prediction Center. Regular outlooks are issued by SPC for severe storms. Once those storms rear their ugly heads, they're followed with mesoscale discussions looking at the active areas. The Storm Prediction Center is also the place where Severe Thunderstorm and Tornado Watches are issued and storm related damage reports are compiled. Lots of hobbyists like to track lightning strikes on their own, and there's equipment available to do just that. Getting hit by lightning is never fun, though not always fatal. National Geographic chronicled an amazing story of a lightning strike, and rescue, on Grand Teton."

285 comments

  1. NLDN by David+M.+Andersen · · Score: 5, Informative

    For a bit of fun, you can check out the National Lightning Detection Network, which shows recent lightning strikes in the USA over the last few hours.

    1. Re:NLDN by j_presper_eckert · · Score: 1

      1.21 gigawatts...it's not just a good idea - it's the law.

      --
      Can't stop the Beta? Time to evacuate to ##altslashdot at webchat.freenode.net - Slashcott in effect.
    2. Re:NLDN by chimpo13 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      For even more fun, don't forget about the Jesus actor in the Passion of Christ being struck by lightning during the filming. The assistant director was hit twice. Probably a pissed off God -- mad that it's supposed to be realistic, what with the Aramaic and all, but Mel Gibson used a white Jesus.

      And then there's Roy Sullivan. A quick google turned this up:

      Roy Cleveland Sullivan was a Forest Ranger in Virginia who had an incredible attraction to lightning... or rather it had an attraction to him. Over his 36-year career as a ranger, Sullivan was struck by lightning seven times - and survived each jolt, but not unscathed. When struck for the first time in 1942, he suffered the loss of a nail on his big toe. Twenty-seven years passed before he was struck again, this time by a bolt that singed his eyebrows off. The next year, in 1970, another strike burned Sullivan's left shoulder. Now it looked as though lightning had it out for poor Roy, and people were starting to call him The Human Lightning Rod. He didn't disappoint them. Lightning zapped him again in 1972, setting his hair on fire and convincing him to keep a container of water in his car, just in case. The water came in handy in 1973 when, seemly just to taunt Sullivan, a low-hanging cloud shot a bolt of lightning at his head, blasting him out of his car, setting his hair on fire and knocking off a shoe. The sixth strike in 1976 injured his ankle, and the seventh strike in 1977, got him when he was fishing, and put him in the hospital for treatment of chest and stomach burns. Lightning may not have been able to kill Roy Sullivan, but perhaps the threat of it did. He took his own life in 1983. Two of his lightning-singed ranger hats are on display at Guinness World Exhibit Halls.

    3. Re:NLDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Re Mr. Cleveland. Damn, he must have done it on purpose. You know, hung out in the wrong spots on purpose. Either that, or the whole thing is urban legend.

      The thing about it blasting him out of his car doesn't make any sense. A vehicle is a wonderful faraday cage. I've known of many people that have had their cars or airplanes struck by lightning. Not one of them was injured in any way.

    4. Re:NLDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you say "publicity stunt"? God hates them movie makers *rolls eyes*

    5. Re:NLDN by seinman · · Score: 1

      If you're touching something conductive inside the car when the strike occurs, then there's a chance you'll get fried. If you're just sittin' there driving along with both hands on the wheel, you should be fine. Or so i've been told.

    6. Re:NLDN by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      Why would that make a difference? The whole car is insulated from the ground by the rubber tires. If the lightning will go through the tires it will just as easily go through the vinyl steering wheel and anything else you're in contact with.

    7. Re:NLDN by pklinken · · Score: 1

      Yes.. i saw a picture of him showing a bolted had..
      He sach mad antenna-man, it an balanse see ?

    8. Re:NLDN by Exitthree · · Score: 4, Informative

      Rubber tires do not protect you from lightning. It's the metal frame of the car which protects you.

    9. Re:NLDN by BackwardEngineer · · Score: 1

      It's not an Urban Legend. The guy used to live in the town I'm in now. (Waynesboro, VA) I've talked to people who had known him quite well and saw the injuries. Funny thing is, the way he was "died", couldn't have been a self-inflicting gunshot.

    10. Re:NLDN by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Think about it, it jumps from the SKY to the GROUND frequently. It's impossible it would jump to a car, remember..from the SKY... and then make that much much harder jump from the bottom of the car to the ground?

      Quite apart from the fact that I saw Richard "Hamster" Hammond sitting in the new Golf while it was struck with lightning on Top Gear last Sunday.

      Any protection you get from sitting in a car is more likely due it acting as a Faraday cage.

    11. Re:NLDN by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of that John Candy movie (Canadian Bacon? I forget).

      "So, how many times were you struck by lightening?"
      "s-six... s-s-six... ss-six..."
      "Wow, six times, eh? That's impressive!"
      "... s-sixty-six t-times..."

    12. Re:NLDN by TastyWords · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "Two wrongs don't make a right but three lefts do."

      -Gallagher

    13. Re:NLDN by xybe · · Score: 1

      It could be argued that it jumps FROM the GROUND to THE SKY although it is too fast to actually see the bolt traveling.

    14. Re:NLDN by CyberBill · · Score: 1

      "The Great Outdoors" http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0095253/ -Bill

      --
      -Bill
    15. Re:NLDN by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Bingo.

    16. Re:NLDN by Feztaa · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I know; my .sig is a parody of that.

    17. Re:NLDN by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      Now if only he had seen the movie Twister
      Rafe: "In a severe lightening storm, you want to grab your ankles and stick your butt in the air."
      Megan: "He's right, if you're gonna get hit, it's the safest orifice."

    18. Re:NLDN by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      but Mel Gibson used a white Jesus.

      Really? Caviezel sounds so much like a Jewish name to me. He's probably slightly on the tall side but the facial features don't seem inconsistent. I haven't found anything that mentions his race.

      Or were you thinking that he was supposed to be black?

    19. Re:NLDN by chimpo13 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From imdb

      His surname is Romansch (Rhaeto-Romanic), from Switzerland. Grew up in a tight-knit Catholic family.

    20. Re:NLDN by hostyle · · Score: 0

      "Avoid standing near tall objects."

      If you avoid standing near tall objects, don't you become the tallest object? And thus more likely to get struck?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    21. Re:NLDN by jeremy9 · · Score: 1

      That is indeed a cool link, but don't forget that it only shows cloud-to-ground lightning, which is only about 10% of all lightning. Vaisala sells that lightning data to power companies so they have a vested interest in filtering out all intracloud lightning. This also means that the data is great at telling you that an established storm is coming, but new storms usually only produce intra-cloud lightning before they get strong enough to produce cloud-to-ground.

      For cool non-realtime stuff, check out these satellite-derived summaries.

      They give an interesting perspective on lightning distributions. There's more lightning over the North Pacific in the winter than the summer, for example (probably because there are more storms).

    22. Re:NLDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      actually, the carbon in the tires helps provide enough of a path to the earth's surface that helps dissipate the lightning's energy to the ground.

      Sure, since lightning really is static electricity, as long as one doesn't touch part of the frame of the car, they'll probably be protected, w/o the tires, the electricity would stay on the outside of the car until it disappated through the air.

      This explains why some cars with tires that replace enough of the carbon in the rubber with silica build up a good static charge on the outside of the vehicle, so one gets the shit shocked out of them when they close the door when exiting the car, for example. The tires are much less conductive, so the static charge on the outside of the car does not dissipate fast enough.

      Airplanes and helicopters generate quite a large static field on them when flying through the air. Airplanes have little metal fingers that hang off the trailing edges of the wings, etc., that help the air "pull" off some of that energy so it does not build up too high as it is flying (remembering from basic electrodynamics class, E fields are concentrated at points, so the points of these protrubances can help dissipate the energy back into the air because the E field is high enough at the point).

    23. Re:NLDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being Catholic is sufficient reason to be struck by lightning.

    24. Re:NLDN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, both variants are possible, from the ground to the sky, and from the sky to the ground.

  2. lightning wit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Q: Why did the blonde keep stopping then smile during a
    lightning storm?

    A: She thought she was getting her picture taken.

  3. Lightning/Tornados or Earthquakes by jimmy+page · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sorry West Coast ....

    Umm.. the constant threat of earthquakes is nothing to sneeze at... while not as loud as thunder/lightning it's sure can be a wild ride.

    http://quake.usgs.gov/recenteqs/latest.htm

    1. Re:Lightning/Tornados or Earthquakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then again, only the most sensitive machines can detect anything less than a mag. 4.5 Anyone who lives in an earthquake-prone region will let you know that a big earthquake hits about once a decade, and the shaking seldom lasts more than fourty seconds.

      When i travel to a lightning prone area, and am lucky to get an electric storm, I love to just sit by the window and watch it for hours. The only enviromental contion that we can see in California are those red-days-from-hell when entire ridglines are on fire.

    2. Re:Lightning/Tornados or Earthquakes by TastyWords · · Score: 1

      Tornados are not fun here in the Midwest (Indiana) but neither will the next earthquake - the New Madrid Fault. California can claim to have all of the earthquakes it wants, but the last time the New Madrid Fault let loose at full strength, the Mississippi River reversed direction for two days and the ground flowed in swells of four-to-five feet high. When California can match those things, we'll talk about whose earthquakes are bigger.

    3. Re:Lightning/Tornados or Earthquakes by whovian · · Score: 1

      I think you are referring to the composition of the ground. Near the fault lines in California the ground is liquidlike, so shock waves do their damage locally for the most part. Having lived in L.A., I gauged that there needed to be at least a magnitude 3 quake or better to even be sensed.

      The reason why the New Madrid quake was particularly bad (thanks for the examples) was the fact that there is a layer of bedrock underlying much of the area. So shock waves tend to travel much farther with greater intensity, able to cause damage relatively far from the epicenter.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
  4. Side effects by NIK282000 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My physiscs teacher discribed an intresting side effect of a lighting storms.

    he was in his pool ans could hear thunder in the distance so he throught he should probably get out, but as the cloud got closer the surface of the pool started to "boil". The huge negative chage in the cloud induced an equal positive charge in the ground underneath it. As this positive charge was attracted to the cloud it made ions in the water making it boil. After pondering that for a minute he jumped ou tof the pool so as not to be killed.

    --
    Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    1. Re:Side effects by scrod98 · · Score: 2
      "...made ions in the water making it boil. "

      Oh yeah, community collej must have been great fun.

      Did you do cold fusion experiments, too?

      --
      LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    2. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, community collej must have been great fun.

      Jeez man, don't be so hard on him. Remember, there are physics teachers in high school, too, and not all Slashdotters are 26.

    3. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Urban myth

    4. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That moderation is +5, it's informative to know just how ignorant some people can be.

    5. Re:Side effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he learned to spell

  5. Re:Sorry west coast? by WhiteBandit · · Score: 1

    Evidentially the submitter has never been to the West Coast. We have thunderstorms during this time of the year too (well, usually they occur later in July and August). Of course they probably aren't as bad as what you find over the midwest, but clearly this dude has no clue what he's talking about. :P

  6. better read by Orodreth · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first link is a little scant on details...if you're really interested in lightning I'd recommend this.

    1. Re:better read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what about ball lightning? How does ball lightning work? I'm begining to think there is no such thing...

    2. Re:better read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly alien flying saucers... or swamp gas! ;)

    3. Re:better read by TastyWords · · Score: 1

      Be more thorough in your research - it's been known to happen, but fairly rare. Tesla's biographies state he could create ball lightning at will (in demonstrations to others). So far (he lived 1854-1943, so there's been sixty-one years since), no one else has repeated this ability. Considering the gov't confiscated all of his belongings when he died, you'd think that type of knowledge would have slipped out.

    4. Re:better read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, japanese researchers have made ball lightning - or something that looks like ball lightning, anyway, with microwaves. Personally, I think ball lightning was probably easily enough made by Tesla, given all the other stuff he made..

  7. i'm here all night... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did the lightning bolt say to the other lightning bolt?

    You're shocking.

  8. Re:Sorry west coast? by enosys · · Score: 1

    California had some pretty serious problems with power a few years ago.

  9. Great Headline by goldmeer · · Score: 4, Funny

    The headline is great!
    Not really on it's own merits, but I instantly imagined the remarks from when the "story" is posted again in 2 weeks: "When Lightning Strikes Twice"

    1. Re:Great Headline by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, you know that the forecasts aren't that accurate. Give it a couple days.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
  10. Watching lightening...up close by RLiegh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know Im going to get modded down for this; but Ive lived in Wa, Tx, Ak and Az; and out of all of them, its (ironically) been in Az where Ive seen lightening the most intensely (longer duration, and more clearly visible) and also the most closely (within blocks of where I live).

    Absolutely breathtaking.

    1. Re:Watching lightening...up close by WhiteBandit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know Im going to get modded down for this; but Ive lived in Wa, Tx, Ak and Az; and out of all of them, its (ironically) been in Az where Ive seen lightening the most intensely (longer duration, and more clearly visible) and also the most closely (within blocks of where I live).

      Absolutely breathtaking.


      I completely agree. We used to spend a lot of time along the Colorado River (Mead and Havasu). You wake up and start with a beautiful, blue clear sky. As the day goes on you can see the clouds forming and growing. By 4 o'clock in the afternoon, the high winds pick up and continue until early in the morning, along with the constant lightening. Definitely an impressive sight.

    2. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I know Im going to get modded down for this; but...

      Well, if you do get modded down, it was only because of those words. Don't. Bait. Them.

    3. Re:Watching lightening...up close by TribeDoktor · · Score: 1

      I'm moving to Tucson in a few weeks to start gradschool at U of A. I've been there during monsoon season and the afternoon thunderstorms are flat out amazing. The lightning was gorgeous as well as scary. I'm coming from Alabama where tornados often rip up the place and was totally impressed by the power of the storms out there. The desert can be as beautiful as it is deadly... I love it out there.

    4. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Orodreth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Incidentally, University of Arizona is where E. Philip Krider works in the Department of Atmospheric Sciences - he basically spearheaded the development of lightning detection systems. Coincidence? Probably not.

    5. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Lightning.

      Lightening would be used as such:

      "I plan on lightening my backpack by throwing away all the books in it that I could potentially use to learn how to spell."

      Lightning.

    6. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Lightning in New Mexico was absolutely spectacular. New Mexico Tech has the Langmuir Lightning Lab, at the top of South Baldy (10,783 foot peak). Charlie Moore and Bernard Vonnegut (brother of author Kurt, now deceased) used to study lightning discharge there.

      Until they tore it down in '98 or '99, New Mexico Tech used to have a lightning observatory right in the middle of campus, part of the legacy of E.J. Workman; it was actually an air traffic control tower, with a full 360-degree view. (Workman was an interesting character himself, having been sent down to Socorro from University of New Mexico to work on the "second most important" technological achievement of WWII, the proximity fuze, at what later became the explosives research and test facility at New Mexico Tech).

      But, anyway- New Mexico has a very high density of lightning, second only to parts of FL (which has its own lightning research center). From firsthand experience, I can state that the size and duration of the strokes can be extremely powerful; one night I was woken up by a particularly powerful one that set off a number of car alarms. There was no storm with no rain before or after- it was as if one of the explosives bunkers had detonated up on the Hill at EMRTC.

      Parts of eastern New Mexico get it even harder. There has to be something about the magnitude of the storms, and maybe the flatness of the land, that forms a particularly large discharge. A good New Mexican frog-strangler is something to behold.

    7. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come to tampa florida

    8. Re:Watching lightening...up close by crasher35 · · Score: 1

      I live in Orlando, the lightning capital of the world (they say), and I'm think I'm going to agree with them on this. Just the other day, I was working at Sea World and lightning struck a few yards away from where I was working, then it struck again on the lake in front of the Nautilus Theater, and then it struck the Sky Tower, and then I ran inside... Lightning is teh scary, but very pretty ^_^! Not so later on, I had to do the trash around the area, so I had to go outside again, and I hear an ambulence siren and my co-worker (Paul, who has been working there much longer than I have) instinctively knew that someone was struck... I proceeded to freak out. Again, lightning is teh scary!

      --

      I don't like to sit. Sitting is for people who like to sit.

    9. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      One summer I interned with the Sheriff's Departement (computer stuff). Once however I got to go out on a call with a deputy after a lightning strike had killed an illegal mexican. I'd never seen anything like it. The dead guy's shoes had been blown off, and he was missing his eyes. His eyes were literally blown out of his head by the force of the strike. I think what happens is that some of the moisture in the body is turned to steam, and that is what exerts the force, not the electricity directly.

    10. Re:Watching lightening...up close by TheTrueGStu · · Score: 1

      Ah, gotta love monsoon season. Alot of times since rain and storms in general are so rare (and so warm during that time of the year) I often will sit out in my driveway and just look around whenever there's any sort of storming going on. I'd say we've had more rain than usual this year, so that's always nice. hmm... last time there was a thunderstorm a decnt distance away that knocked out power and now an old Emachines of mine won't seem to start up... probably going to have to replace the power supply, and buy a surge protector

    11. Re:Watching lightening...up close by CGP314 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I know Im going to get modded down for this; but Ive lived in Wa, Tx, Ak and Az; and out of all of them, its (ironically) been in Az where Ive seen lightening the most intensely (longer duration, and more clearly visible) and also the most closely (within blocks of where I live).

      Please tell me why you think you will be modded down for this? No pro-ms or pro-sco comment here. Oh that's right, people just say it as a way to get modded up through reverse physiology.

      I wish there was a way in the preferences to set all comments either the words "I know I'm going to get modded down for this" or "I've got karma to burn" at -1

    12. Re:Watching lightening...up close by number6x · · Score: 1

      I always used to love spending time with Charlie at Workman center each year. He was my undergraduate advisor.

      Turns out he was pretty good at making UFO's as well. At least there sure are a lot of people who believe the weather balloons he used to make during project mogul were UFO's!

      I miss those afternoon summer thunderstorms in Socorro.

    13. Re:Watching lightening...up close by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living close to the Front Range of the Rocky Mts is a good place to (Arvada, CO). T-Storms often roll off of the Rockies to the west, and Arvada is close enough to them that they experience a bit of a rain shadow effect. So you have lightning popping off on the mountain tops 5000 feet or so above you, as well as the areas around you (the cloud deck is high enough above you also). Then, later in the afternoon, the storm has passed off to the east, and the tornado warnings and threats in Limon, Aurora, etc. are coming in on the radio...

      Arizona gets warm humid air flowing up from the Sea of Cortez (or Gulf of California), and it hits the dry air above the mts... It is very cool if you are up in the hills above Phoenix...

      Living in the Chicago area, the only bummer about the T-storms is that by they time they usually seem to get close to Chicago they've spent out most of their energy. The over-arching cloud tops blot out the sun a couple of hours before the storm comes through.

      It was fun a few times at the in-laws house in Morris, IL watching big storms go by the north and south on a hot, humid Sept evening, and seeing the lightning from both storms...

      T-Storms, at least in western Washington, are completely underwhelming (as well as infrequent).

      Of course, when we were in Florida (Ft Lauderdale/Miama), driving around under the edge of T-storm clouds popping up to over 60,000 feet up before they even started to hit the stratosphere was pretty cool. LOTS of rain from those!

    14. Re:Watching lightening...up close by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      I have lived in Tucson all my life.

      True story. A few months ago, a friend was hiking with his two sons and some other 12-14yr old Boy Scouts. A good little zapper nailed a tree about 60 feet in front of them on the trail. The boys were spread out, and the ones with my friend did the right thing and immediately hit the ground. There were two boys walking further ahead (and closer to the blast) who did not. They saw the flash and heard the earsplitting boom and turned tail and ran backwards for about 300 yards screaming their heads off like little girls.

      For pre-early teenage boys, this was mortifying. Their compadres got a good hoot out of that.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    15. Re:Watching lightening...up close by jplanet · · Score: 1

      There's a well-done book written about the lab [Storms Above the Desert] by Joe Chew with an intro by Bernard Vonnegut.

  11. FffiiiiiZZZAP! by scrod98 · · Score: 4, Funny

    As someone who has lost his share of equipment to lightning hits over the years (telephones, one PC, even a CB radio) I love being able to unplug my wireless laptop and feel safe to keep surfing. God bless 802.11b.

    --
    LETS DECOMPOSE & ENJOY ASSEMBLING
    1. Re:FffiiiiiZZZAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So then, what happens to your router?

    2. Re:FffiiiiiZZZAP! by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You may feel safe, but any strong "local" (100m radius) strike will likely induce enough current in the front end of your wi-fi card to fry it regardless.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:FffiiiiiZZZAP! by tcgroat · · Score: 2, Informative
      Lightning-induced current in the antenna is unlikely to damage a laptop WiFi card. Lightning has decreasing energy density at higher frequencies, being limited by the pulse width and rise time (both > 1usec). A quarter wavelength strip-line stub will effectively protect the equipment, and is inexpensive to fabricate (a PC board trace).

      Microwave equipment has little trouble from the antenna itself. The culprits are mostly power cables and antenna feed lines, neither of which is a concern for a laptop running on batteries and using a built-in WiFi antenna. Anything close enough to hurt the laptop poses serious risks to you.

  12. umm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    boom


    That would be thunder you idiot!

  13. No lightning for CA? by Faust7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    For most of the United States (sorry West Coast), this is the season for lightning.

    Damn. And I had my cable hanging down from the Hill Valley Clock Tower all ready too.

    1. Re:No lightning for CA? by jeffkjo1 · · Score: 1

      Great Scott!

      Thanks for a great laugh!

    2. Re:No lightning for CA? by IronChef · · Score: 1

      Lightning is VERY cool. I saw it on TV once.

      - California Boy

    3. Re:No lightning for CA? by dacarr · · Score: 1
      It's rare here in Orange County, but not uncommon. Two lightning storms I recall were in October 1982 and Labor Day weekend 1997. The first one was a precursor to a two minute hail storm; the latter one was somehow coincidental to the opening of phase two of a nearby shopping center, and touched off a small blaze in Tonner Canyon (just north of Brea).

      Both were quite spectacular, and while I can't speak for the former light storm, the latter one was of no general danger - see, it was primarily focused on some hills surround the Brea Canyon area (in which Tonner is located), atop which is a transmitter station for a not to distant from here radio station. Of course, this means very tall metal towers that are protected against this sort of thing.

      You do the math.

      --
      This sig no verb.
  14. Re:Sorry west coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Eh? I'm sure if the power goes it in Yuma on the hottest day of the a few people will die. We lose a few hundred border crossers a year here. An the occasional tourists.

    For those of you visiting Arizona and planning on going on a hike. 1 liter of water is good for about... oh 20-30 minutes?

  15. lightning.. by sinner0423 · · Score: 3, Interesting



    I've never been directly struck by lightning, but I have been "zapped" i guess you can say, by some sort of mild electric shock when a big bolt hit right near my apartment complex.

    I ran upstairs to the 3rd floor, to shut a window because it had been raining.. I go to close the window, i'm standing on wet carpet (the whole room is practically soaked) and suddenly BLAM. Big lightning strike, and I got shocked. It almost felt like my whole body was doing a tongue test on those square 9v batteries. Probably the closest i've ever come to being struck.

    Has this happened to anyone else? I had previously believed that one could only get struck or zapped by lightning outside of a house.

    1. Re:lightning.. by dotslashconfig · · Score: 4, Informative

      What you probably experienced was the resulting radio waves that are emitted when the charge from a bolt of lightning enters the ground (though you probably only got a mild version of this).

      This is why people are discouraged from "seeking shelter" under large trees during a lightning storm. Not only is the taller object more likely to be struck by lightning, but also the radio waves emitted within a 10-15 ft radius can cause you to go into cardiac arrest. Dangerous stuffs if you're too close to the strike point.

    2. Re:lightning.. by kc8jhs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although I don't have a link or reference to the article (other than I believe I read it in Reader's Digest), there have been several cases of individuals struck by lightning indoors. One instance that stands out in my mind, was a story of a woman, in a basement who was struck by lightning while washing clothes, and reaching towards a glass block window, where her detergent was sitting.

      "Can I get struck by lightning when I'm indoors?"

      NWS Lightning Safety: Indoors

      -Mikey P

    3. Re:lightning.. by rmcd · · Score: 1

      I was in a room level with the back yard when lightning struck a tree perhaps 75 feet away. Several of us in bare feet felt an electric shock. So yes, it has happened to others!

    4. Re:lightning.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radio waves?! WTF is this Mr. Rogers lightning tutorial?

      More likely eletricity traveled through the ground, into the wet carpet (most likely via water pipes or other conductor), and into the victim. I've had it happen dozens of times. It came into the house via wires from outside. I can hear when lightning hits trees in the backyard because the wires arc to the water pipes (I see the burn marks as well). High voltage travels across wet ground very easily.

    5. Re:lightning.. by rco3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Err... no.

      There is a great big electric field associated with a nearby channel, and field gradients can result in some really interestingly large voltages to appear across things like the ground.

      However, to call these fields radio waves implies that they are oscillatory in nature, which is simply not accurate. I'm a lightning researcher, and in the course of my work I've studied lightning electric fields recorded during close lightning strikes. It's not my personal favorite area of interest, but I know enough to say that "radio waves" is a poor description.

      The reason that you don't stand near trees during an electrical storm is because 1) the flash is likely to initiate a side channel which passes from the tree-trunk (radio tower, light pole, bus stop, etc) through you, making you very unhappy; and 2) because the HUGE injection of current into the ground causes the ground itself to "rise" from a nominal 0 volts to several kilo- or even mega-volts, and that voltage falls off as the square of the distance... so that if your two legs are 10 feet and 12 feet respectively from the channel termination point, you might experience a voltage of several kV (or more) between them. This causes a current to flow up one leg and down the other, and makes you (and your goodies, don't ya know) very unhappy. This is worse if you happen to have four legs which CAN'T be placed together, like if you're a cow or horse. Zap!

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    6. Re:lightning.. by Frogbert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have been hit by lightning and it is a surreal experiance, essentialy it goes like this:

      A split second before your hit you know something is up, your hair starts to stand on end and you get goosebumps.

      Then it hits. You feel torn towards the lightning stream almost as if it attracts you to it. All your bodies muscles and tendons constrict, your fingers tighten so hard your nails cut into the palms of your hands. Its like licking one hell of a 12volt battery.

      Then you collapse and pass out for a bit. When you wake up your "exit point" in this case my foot is burning beyond belief, due to the fact that it is quite seriously burnt. Your mouth tastes of copper and you can smell electricity everywhere.

      Afterwards your hair stands on end for HOURS and doesn't go down.

      At least that is my experiance.

    7. Re:lightning.. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Further to the other explanation below, standing near trees may also be hazardous in that they tend to explode and throw bits of themselves outwards. Something to do with the sap being heated up and expanding? I forget..

    8. Re:lightning.. by 68K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another reason for not hiding under a tree when there's lightning going on is that the tree can bloody well explode. I've seen it happen. I imagine a chunk of rapidly moving tree can do a lot of damage to a relatively soft and squidgy human.

    9. Re:lightning.. by santiag0 · · Score: 1
      I wasn't struck, but it was very close. I was at a park, and a bad thunderstorm hit. I started to run for my truck, which was about 75 yards away across the park, on the other side of a row of trees. When I was about 10 yards from the trees, I felt the hair on the back of my neck stand up and stopped - the bolt hit the tree right in front of me. Very loud. The flash was very bright too, I remember seeing the image on my retina for a long time afterwards - 15 minutes or so. I can also agree with Frogbert about the "electrical" smell.

      It blew the tree apart, splitting it down the middle. Pieces of the tree exploded in a semi-circle out about 30 yards all around it. One nice chunk got blown right past me, missing me by a foot or two. I picked it up and later carved a walking stick out of it. Sitting in my bedroom now. This was in about 1982. "The Natural" came out a couple of years later. I got a good chuckle out of his bat - carving a bat didn't even occur to me.

    10. Re:lightning.. by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      That "electrical" smell is ozone. When your hair wants to stand up from the charge, and you smell that ozone building up, that's your last minute warning that lightning is striking real close, real soon!

    11. Re:lightning.. by RailRide · · Score: 1
      2) because the HUGE injection of current into the ground causes the ground itself to "rise" from a nominal 0 volts to several kilo- or even mega-volts, and that voltage falls off as the square of the distance... so that if your two legs are 10 feet and 12 feet respectively from the channel termination point, you might experience a voltage of several kV (or more) between them. This causes a current to flow up one leg and down the other, and makes you (and your goodies, don't ya know) very unhappy. This is worse if you happen to have four legs which CAN'T be placed together, like if you're a cow or horse. Zap!

      In one of the lightning documentaries, (you've probably seen this one) there is a clip of a soccer game taking place on a rain-soaked field. Lightning strikes the ground off to the side of the field, and roughly a third of the players immediatley fall, knocked senseless by the jolt.

      Knowing point (2) above about electrical flow across a body with two points of ground contact during a nearby strike leads me to believe that the players who remained on their feet and uninjured were the ones who had only one foot in contact with the ground at the moment of the strike. However, nothing of the sort was ever mentioned or discussed in repeated showings of this footage, leaving me to wonder if I guessed right.

      ---PCJ

    12. Re:lightning.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, how can the field not be oscillatory when the average lightning event is made up of a strike and numerous secondary strikes?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:lightning.. by rco3 · · Score: 1

      You can think of the strokes as being a series of irregularly-spaced delta functions. They aren't perfect delta functions, of course, because there isn't any such thing. Now, a perfect delta function has power at all frequencies (i'm simplifying), but for a very short period of time. The lightning flash (collection of leaders and strokes) often has several strokes, but since the temporal spacing is uneven there is no fundamental frequency you can measure.

      It goes up and down, but it's not oscillating - at least not harmonically.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    14. Re:lightning.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes very interesting.

      I was chating to a individual that was hit by lighting. I was standing on his front step of his house and he opened the door. I was trying to convince my friend to let me inside so I would not be hit by lighting.

      I never felt any effect but I knew something was up when his hair stood all up. The best part was the loud clap of thunder and the effect it had on him.

      Part of me feels he desired it for not letting me in sooner and it was God way of telling to stop being such an ass.

      This was the second time my poor had been hit by lighting. I think he had a bit too much iron in in system and he acted like a lighting rod. As soon as it starts to rain he rushs indoors.

  16. As someone who forecasts the weather... by cabra771 · · Score: 5, Funny

    As someone who forecasts the weather

    Sorry, you've lost all credibility right there.

    --

    -my other sig is your mom
    1. Re:As someone who forecasts the weather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You need to distinguish between the lusers who do weather on TV and the real weather forcasters who (in the US, anyway) work at the National Weather Service (part of the NOAA). These folks really do know what they are doing, and if you take some time to look at the "forcast discussions" that accompany some of the real NWS forcast products, you'd gain a an appreciation for how hard weather forcasting is for those who do it for real.

      Have a look at this, for example.

    2. Re:As someone who forecasts the weather... by BeesTea · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're spot on. In fact some of the biggest iron in the top 500 are simulating weather.

      --
      2b2b2b415448300d
  17. Show me the exit please by loid_void · · Score: 1

    I understand that when lightening enters your body and then abruptly leaves, that you are left with a nasty exit wound.

    --
    Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
    1. Re:Show me the exit please by krray · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure of the relationship :), but my fathers cousin was hit and the exit wound was at the knee. It blew/burned the rest of the leg off...

    2. Re:Show me the exit please by krray · · Score: 1

      And then there is my brother. It was more of a glancing blow. He still hides during storms at 40. No exit wound to speak of, but I always say it obviously got stuck in and bounced around his brain.

    3. Re:Show me the exit please by loid_void · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you mention one more relative, this will be an observable pattern worth formal inspection. We know lightning strikes trees, but family trees?

      --
      Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
  18. Harnessing the power by kmccoy · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there's anything that could be done to capture the power in lightning. Has anyone seen anything about this? Perhaps some sort of equipment attached to a lightning rod on a tall building?

    1. Re:Harnessing the power by Bombcar · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some sort of equipment attached to a lightning rod on a tall building?

      Maybe a Delorean.......

    2. Re:Harnessing the power by rco3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's a nice thought, harnessing the power of lightning. And it's true that there's a really high power output. However, the duration is so short that the total energy, in terms of kilowatt-hours, is typically on the order of US$0.20 - US$0.30 per lightning flash.

      When we in the University of Florida lightning research group trigger a lightning flash, we use a $500 rocket to get that US$0.30 worth of electricity. This alone makes the whole process very cost-ineffective. Add to this the fact that there is not a good way to store that much energy that quickly, and you quickly realize that it's simply not practical to try to store lightning energy.

      I'll be glad to share more information, if anyone's interested.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    3. Re:Harnessing the power by fbjon · · Score: 2

      "When the Phantom moves, lightning stands still."
      -Old jungle saying-


      So all that is needed is:

      1. Hire Phantom
      2. Wait for lightning to strike charging equipment
      3. Make Phantom move indefinitely
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    4. Re:Harnessing the power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya, not a whole lot of power in a lightning strike. Lots of voltage, not much current (relatively speaking).

    5. Re:Harnessing the power by rco3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We typically see a peak current of about 10 - 30 kA per stroke, with an average of 2 or 3 subsequent strokes per flash. That's the successful triggers, of course. We only get current at ALL about 50% of the time, and about 25% of the time we get actual return strokes.

      We often strike a section of de-energized power line, with a (nominal) impedance of 400 ohms. That translates into peak voltage of 10 megavolts as a first approximation, and about 250 gigawatts. But, since the peak duration is no more than a couple of microseconds, that's about 500 kilowatt-seconds, and 138 watt-hours - less than a single kilowatt-hour.

      Er - what do you do, to consider 25 kA "not much current"? Just wondering...

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    6. Re:Harnessing the power by smokin_juan · · Score: 1

      You're right if you're talking about a lighting rod on someones house or one of your fancy rockets, but these days there are fools talking about putting up elevators that run clear out to space. Then you may recall an experiment from the shuttle with a tether being dragged through space to collect energy - so much in fact that it cooked the tether. now, you may say that the tether was in motion, acting as an armature and that a space elevator (modified to conduct) is stationary, but what of the difference in potential between space and earth's surface?
      please don't try this though because just like the space elevator, it's bound to wick the earths atmosphere out into space. and we wouldn't like that now would we?
      but seriously, there's bound to be some really fat potential between here and there and if you could string a conductor all the way to space as they're implying with the elevator...
      1. blah
      2. blah
      3. blah
      4. profit!
      I'm also wondering why your rockets are so expensive? how high do you need to go to grab a bolt? can't you just ionize the air with a big laser? why don't you just e-mail all your class notes to me while you're at it ;)

    7. Re:Harnessing the power by rco3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The use of a large, really large fixed object such as a really tall tower or a skyhook would allow for the capture of a significantly increased amount of lightning, true. That is a very good point. That doesn't solve the storage problem, though.

      Our rockets themselves aren't that expensive, truthfully. And we can usually reuse the rocket proper, we just load a new motor in it. Those are cheap. What's expensive is the spool of wire attached to the rocket. You'd think that getting 700 m of 32 ga wire wrapped on a spool would be cheap, but to get a spool wrapped with 32 ga Kevlar-reinforced wire which will spool off cleanly every time is, in fact, a non-trivial task. That's where most of the $500 figure comes from. That DOESN'T include the costs of site maintenance, personnel, range safety, etc.

      The typical successful trigger occurs at something between 300 m and 700 m here in Florida. It may be different elsewhere, where the clouds are higher.

      Lightning flashes HAVE been triggered with large lasers. But we don't have one. We could probably get one, if we could find someone to fund the purchase, but then the amortized cost per flash would probably (yeah, I'm just guessing) exceed the cost of the rockets we use now.

      Most of my class notes are pretty well encapsulated in the book my profs wrote, Lightning: Physics and Effects by Rakov and Uman. I imagine Amazon has it, but it's real spendy - I don't even own a copy. However, it's pretty much a definitive and comprehensive treatment of the subject. The bibliography alone is worth the price.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
    8. Re:Harnessing the power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      correct, "relatively speaking" is what I said.

      25 kA is not much compared to 10 megavolts.

      Compare that to 120 volts at 20 amps like what you might get in your house (64 times more current than lightning!)

    9. Re:Harnessing the power by rco3 · · Score: 1

      Err... what?

      20 amps is 64 times more than 25 kiloamps?

      I'm sorry, I obviously wasn't prepared to debate you in your own forum.

      --

      Ce n'est pas un vrai mouvement de robot!
  19. Can't we save the energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't we capture lightning and store the energy in giant capacitors or something?

    Yes, I have no idea what I'm talking about.

    1. Re:Can't we save the energy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Static electricity travels on surfaces.

  20. NMT LMS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Don't forget the New Mexico Tech Lightning Mapping System. Here's the link http://ibis.nmt.edu/nmt_lms/

    It has some pretty neat images of their lightning mappings. You can see the lightning in 3D, and the precursors to lightning, etc.

    Not much info, but there's been some really neat research going on out there. Maybe someone else knows more.

  21. Something smells like aluminum... by AcidPhish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this will be the season for antennae and wireless shops around the US. With the growing WAN's around the place, and the endless similarity between a lightning rod and those antennae... Ouch!

    Fun to watch but expensive to reproduce...

    --
    Beta Sucks
    1. Re:Something smells like aluminum... by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, i'll vouch for the concern about wLAN and their gear being protected. I did installs for a wireless operation down here in south Texas where the storms REALLY get intense. SO what we do is ground the mast itself and isolate the computer and electronics by using isolation tranformers and UPCs to isolate the systems from strikes so that if a strike does occurr, it will damage the protection gear and not the acutal systems.

      YDI had built a all-in-one antenna that had the Ethernet gear and transcever all built into the antenna that gave me such concern that i had to make direct contact with the manufacture to see what sort of lightning suppression was available. So to my surprise and distress, he admitted that they had managed to get just into production a suppressor for the antenna unit. And this was for a unit that had been in production for over 2 years!
      Well, with that said, i simply nodded and used the time-tested method of instructing the clients to unplug whenever mum nature got ugly, or was planning to.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  22. Info on thunder and lightning by ikluft · · Score: 1

    I posted some links and info at http://lightning.thunder.net/ after getting pestered by enough kids trying to do research for school work who kept writing to the webmaster address for this domain.

  23. Unpredictable by digital_milo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife's best friend was killed by lightning in Houston in 2001. A storm had passed though about a half hour before and it appeard to be clearing. She went into the front yard to do some weeding in a flower bed beside the driveway. Her house was in the middle of a bunch of very large pines. They probably had 2 dozen 75-100' pine trees throughout the yard and the entire lot was under the canopy. Not to mention that there were 2 aluminum light poles within 25 yards of where she was struck. Examining the damage afterwards, a tree was struck. The lightning travelled along the tree for about 15 feet and then must have travelled through the air, through her body and into the rebar in the driveway (or reverse that since lightning supposedly travels up). A neighbor began cpr within 2 minutes and they had her to a hospital within 15-20 minutes. They got her heart working again eventually, but never any brain activity. I kinda like to think that she died immediatly. From what I was told, there wasn't any visible damage to her body except for some blood from her nose and mouth (that was third hand since the neighbor wouldn't talk about it).

    1. Re:Unpredictable by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "My wife's best friend was killed by lightning in Houston in 2001."

      Ugh. You know how they talk about how games desensitize people? I've been playing Unreal Tournament 04 way too much over the last week. One of the weapons that I've grown to love is the Lightning gun. It fires a bolt of lightning and *zaap*. I love sniping with it.

      Despite really enjoying zapping people with this game, reading that somebody you know (or your wife knows...) died with it really made my heart sink.

      I hope I'm not being disrespectful. That's not the intent... I just noticed... Ya know?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Unpredictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or reverse that since lightning supposedly travels up

      IIRC, the lightning channel opens from both sides (cloud and ground), the current can flow upward or downward. So, I guess that both answers are correct. But in unfortunate events like these accidents, this detail doesn't matter.

    3. Re:Unpredictable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps someone can speak to the old wives tale that says pine trees are particularly likely to get struck by lighting.

    4. Re:Unpredictable by h2odragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      dunno about pines, particularly, but i can speak to hickory trees being favored targets over oaks, polars, etc. Hickory trees have long, straight taproots, and a dense wet wood: they get blasted even when there's taller, non-hickory trees nearby.

  24. i think you're all the same idiot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you're trying to get a buzz going around your idiotic FP attempt that didn't even work!

  25. the replier inherits the idiocy of the parent..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and adds his own idiocy. The idiocy grows across deep levels of inheritance.

  26. Best job in the world... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is being a weather guesser. Thursday night the weather weenies were saying how sunny and warm and nice it would be today. The high was 62, and we got 2 inches of rain. No weather forecasters were fired. They're never fired, no matter how often they're wrong. Hell, they never get so much as a day off without pay for screwing up royally. So kids - study meteorology and broadcasting in college if you want to make the big bucks and have job security.

  27. Misc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I spent a lot of time in the Rockies during Summers of my youth. We were taught that if the hair stood up on any part of our body, ditch the backpack and dive flat. I saw a guy who had three quarters and a pocketknife end up with an entry point of some metal slag who was caught by surprise.

    Also, there are different types of lightning & static activity - Tesla seemed to be the master during his lifetime. One of the most baffling types of static|lightning activity is ball lighting. There have been stories for a long, long time beyond FOAF|UL describing a small globe of what appears to be lightning in an orb, having appeared out of nowhere, moving about without a pattern, then disappearing as mysteriously. IIRC, most of the reports involve aircraft. Tesla demonstrated great prowess in creating them, controlling them, and destroying them, to the bewilderment of all. And for all who thought he was a crackpot while he was alive (including the gov't), why did they pack up all of his belongings when he died and send them off to parts unknown?

  28. Do Detectors Work? by buckhead_buddy · · Score: 3, Funny

    I live next to a golf course with a lightning detector to warn golfers of electrical activity in the vicinity. I'm not trying to paint all such products with the same brush, but the detector only seems to trigger the warning sirens just after a thunderclap so I've been somewhat skeptical of the utility of these devices.

    Still the noise from the detector is better than golf balls hitting my roof so anything that gets people off the course and give me peace is welcome.

    1. Re:Do Detectors Work? by loid_void · · Score: 1

      The best detector for golfers is that when they here the rumble, the crack is not far away. We use this for kids baseball all the time. It's called the thunderstorm rule. Works great. Game is always called.

      --
      Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
    2. Re:Do Detectors Work? by Jardine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We use this for kids baseball all the time. It's called the thunderstorm rule. Works great. Game is always called.

      There's a very good reason to call a baseball game when there's lightning around. Most of the fields around here have a metal backstop usually around 15 feet tall. The umpire (the one who gets to decide to call the game) stands under this giant lightning rod.

      If the umpire doesn't call a game with lightning nearby, he's probably as dumb and blind as the losing team's fan's think he is.

  29. Weather by Axel2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am a weather spotter for the national weather service and I have seen some interesting storms here in VA... We once had a storm so intense that the sky was dark enough around 2:00pm that you could see stars in the breaks of the clouds and the moon was "shining." That was freaky - apparently, that storm spawned a "small" tornado that threw individual blades of grass through a telephone pole. In 1985, the southern part of the state, where I am originally from, experienced the "Flood of 85." The Roanoke river crested at a record 23 feet... tons of damage was done, but some amazing stories, like that of an aging Labrador retriever in Eagle Rock that pulled its master to safety out of the rolling waters of Craig Creek, came out of it... Here is a photo of the Roanoke stadium.

    1. Re:Weather by Axel2001 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, um, wtf? I'm glad to see the quality readers we have on this site.

    2. Re:Weather by SkiifGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was going to mod this, but I thought I should reply instead. I call BS on the claim you could see the stars through the cloud breaks. I don't know what you were looking at, but it wouldn't have been the stars unless the storm clouds were dense enough and thick enough to extend all the way through the atmosphere to mitigate the effect of the atmosphere in distributing light. This is the same reason why you can't see stars when looking up through a long chimney / mine shaft / whatever during the day.

    3. Re:Weather by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

      I live in NC. I know people from VA. He probably really believes he saw stars.

      --

      --
      What would Bill Clinton do?
    4. Re:Weather by back_pages · · Score: 1
      Interesting. I've been living in Blacksburg for about a year now and must admit that the weather here is quite volatile.

      When I lived in Tennessee I once saw a summer thunderstorm where the clouds doubled back on themselves. I was working construction at the time and we got to go home if it rained, so I spent a lot of time watching the clouds that day. Thick black clouds rushed in from the NE, but 20 minutes later they were all heading back toward the NE as the weather patterns typically did in that region.

      I don't know if this storm created any tornadoes over the hilly terrain, but it was impressive to see clouds rolling over and change direction. The rain was so thick that it was really impossible to drive and there was no ambient sunlight - almost pitch black at 4:30pm. This is probably usual weather for some places but it was quite a sight in Tennessee.

    5. Re:Weather by Axel2001 · · Score: 1

      Actually, blades of grass being thrown through objects during storms is well-documented. Just one site I found that explains this is Here.

      As far as the stars are concerned, I understand what you are saying. I also know that I did see stars as impossible as that may seem... the sky was completely black.

    6. Re:Weather by Axel2001 · · Score: 1

      BTW, this is in response to the "you fucking cunt" remark. Intelligent and thought-provoking, I have to admit.

    7. Re:Weather by Ticklemonster · · Score: 1

      A weather spotter? I am a weather spotter for Skywarn, probably the same thing. KF4SMU is my call sign. Ham operators are the ones who usually make up the majority (if not all) of the spotters for the weather service. Trained to observe the weather and report facts, they (spotters) are the only reliable source the weather service has (other than wanton destruction, but by then, it's too late). If a cell is determined to have the makings of a tornado, the weather service puts out the alert, and the hams head out to certain doom. Using 2 meter or 440s to contact net control, these spotters give confirmation to the net controller that either a funnel cloud is whisping about, or that indeed it touched down and is in search of the nearest trailer park. The net controller then contacts the weather service with this confirmation. Ham operators many times are organized to give communications support to local emergency management agencies (unless they are headed by an total moron, ahem) to help with keeping traffic through the 911 centers at a minimum. The weather spotters and ham operators are the unsung heros of ... well, something, we just can't figure that out yet. lol

      --
      Karma: Bad is the liberal way of saying this guy won't drink the kool aid here on slash dot. I wear my Karma with pride
  30. Grand Teton huh? Really... by Eddy+Da+KillaBee · · Score: 0
    National Geographic chronicled an amazing story of a lightning strike, and rescue, on Grand Teton.
    In Spanish, Teton (or Tetona) is slang for tit. Does this mean Nation Geographic covered someone's rescue on a boob? Did a geek pass out after touching one? ;)
  31. oh let me count the lightning stories... by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A guy I know put an antenna up in a pine tree, about 70 feet, without a ground wire. Needless to say it got nailed, about 2am while he slept. Detonated the antenna, peeling it into 2ft long, thin strips of fiberglass. Boiled his coax, all the way into his house. Electrofried his radio, and set its power cord on fire. (under his bed, where he was sleeping, setting the carpet on fire) Blew the outlet off the wall. Got into the breaker box and destroyed several breakers, two microwaves, and three color TVs. Finally found ground via the phone entrance box on the outside of the house, which was blown off the house. This was the SECOND time he had been hit, the previous time was the same exact scenario, just not as damaging.

    A guy down the block got his ham radio antenna hit, blowing the base of the antenna to pieces. (severing the ground connection in the process, unfortunately) The lightning then took out his coax like det cord, which was laid down under one layer of shingles. This shot the shingles that were laid over the coax right off the house. It then took out his radio, followed the power cord into the electrical system in his house, took out all the appliances in his kitchen, and then went underground to his garage and took out three marine radios that were on charge at the time.

    A friend and former co-worker had an employee of his arrive late to work. When asked of the excuse, he said he got his truck struck by lightning on the way in. And boy did he. They never found any of the whip antenna. The base of it, solid brass, was melted like ice cream. Blew out the back sliding windows where the coax came into the cab. Blew the radio to pieces. Finally found ground via front left quarterpanel, which was permanently bowed inward from the sudden heating.

    I worked on someone's computer recently, they had pictures on their desktop of a relative's car that was struck while going down the highway. It hit the rear mounted stereo antenna, arced into the body of the car, (creating a 1/2" hole in the metal near the antenna mount) and found ground via ALL FOUR TIRES, arcing across the wheel wells and apparently through the steel belts, flattening all four tires in the process. It also blew out the rear window from the concussion.

    My car was struck by lightning while on the road too. Took out the headlights and the windshield wipers, which then started working normally a few hours later. (probably tripped the breakers that those items usually are on instead of fuses)

    I have a large ham radio antenna at my house as well, which has been struck at least three times so far, you can count the char marks on it. Thanks goes to a 1/4" solid aluminum ground wire and a 10ft copper water pipe for a ground rod, the lightning has never even scratched my radio, which remains plugged in and cabled up 24/7.

    Lastly, if you're ever on a beach and run into a patch of what appears like a cross between pavement and sand, that's where lightning has struck the beach and melted the sand into glass. Really weird effect...

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a dangerous person to know!

    2. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by jwcorder · · Score: 1
      Wow that's amazing. Did you know that if you eat pop rocks and drink Coke, you could die? What about if you go in the bathroom and chant Candyman, Candyman, Candyman without turning on the light? OR what about....JESUS! Get real dude, I allowed the first two. But my bullshit meter starting going off real loud somewhere around ALL FOUR TIRES, arcing across the wheel wells and apparently through the steel belts, flattening all four tires in the process. It also blew out the rear window from the concussion.

      There is a flag on the play....-5 mod points for bullshiting the /. community. Next time, space it out a little.

      --
      http://jayceecorder.blogspot.com
    3. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by cheese_wallet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "But my bullsh*t meter starting going off real loud somewhere around ALL FOUR TIRES"

      why does that bother you?

      If you had a single voltage source, and 4 resistors in parallel, would you not get current flow through all 4?

      What if one was a million times as resistive as the others?

    4. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by ColaMan · · Score: 1

      It's not that far-fetched - I've a photo (a real, chemical photo, offline,sorry) of a set of treads burnt into the bitumen around the rails on a railway crossing.

      I got it from a safety course I went to from the rail company about working around electric locomotives. It was from some sort of army vehicle that tried to cross under a set of overhead traction wires that oops! had an antenna a little bit too tall. That was just 25kV.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    5. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a floridian, I have been zapped via a lightening ground strike while holding a sattelite multiswitch, it actually got an arc going between my hands and the multiswitch, thought I was dead......

      As far as the car thing goes, well I actually know someone firsthand who lost all four tires on the sawgrass expressway at speed when struck by lightening, car was totaled......so I'd have to say no it's not bullshit...

      If you live in Florida and it's your time to go it will get you, one of my childhood friends lost his father to a lightening strike, a maint worker at my mothers work had all the clothing blown from his body and his head ruptured due to the strike, it's frequently on the news down here how someone died due to a strike, the details of what happens to people when struck are usually far to gory to put on tv, dead on strikes turn people inside out.

    6. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *COUGH* *COUGH* [1] *COUGH* *COUGH*





      [1] bullshit.

    7. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I've seen household wiring from a house that has been hit by lightning. Over here in the UK, we use flattish oval cable with a thick grey PVC jacket, which covers two thick copper wires with red and black insulation for phase and neutral, and a thinner bare copper wire for earth.


      Lightning had struck the outside light at the corner of this house, and had blown the insulation off the wire. It had smashed like toffee, almost like it had been frozen in liquid nitrogen and hit with a hammer.


      An office I used to do IT stuff for got hit by lightning, and it vapourised the copper inside a 5-foot length of network cable. There was just this length of thin ethernet cable that looked... just *wrong*. The braid had been "sputtered" onto the inside of the PVC jacket!

    8. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Perhaps you are saying this because you have heard from someone that electricity takes the path of least resistance. That is, quite simply, not true. Electricity takes all paths it can readily find to ground. If the resistance between the car and the road was similar through each tire, it is entirely possible that it will do this.

      The majority of current takes the path of least resistance. But, lightning is extremely powerful. It has an amazing amount of voltage so it can make very long jumps - you knew this already. It also has an equally amazing amount of current which lets it do interesting things like burn holes in stuff, and readily ionize air. Ionized air carries electricity more readily which is why your average lightning strike is made up of not just one big strike, but one big strike followed by multiple secondary strikes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by v1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, all four tires. I saw the pictures of the car sitting parked in the driveway with four flats. Then closeup shots of one of the wheels where you could see how it arced from the wheelwell into the tire where the bead seal is. I wish I had made copies, but it wasn't my computer...

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    10. Re:oh let me count the lightning stories... by thogard · · Score: 1

      The computer science building at Okie State got hit sometime in the late 80's and it took out everything inside it except the IBM big iron that was on a motor generator pair.

      Florida gets lots of lighting strikes but the ones that Oklahoma tend to have far more energy and a direct strike from one of the big thunderstorms is going to take out lots of other stuff. I've seen sheet lightning that hit two different towers that were at least 60 miles apart.

      I've seen one bit of gear damanged that was connected over fiber optic cable. It plastic jacket just happened to conduct enough that the millions of volts over the few hundred yards still zapped the mux on the other end.

      Lightning is interesting stuff. The typical claims are a 100 million volts and up to 10,000 amps but there have been measured strikes at 100k amps and 1gv. One day someones going to get rich by solving how to store that energy.

  32. Watching thuderstorms in the midwest... by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

    My wife likes to go outside on the porch and watch lightening storms. I live in Texas - so the storms can get pretty intense.

    I prefer to stay inside, and not present a path to ground (or more accurately a path from ground) for the random bolts.

    --

    Lodragan Draoidh
    The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
  33. Numerical Weather Prediction and others by thedogcow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As someone who is finishing his BS in Meteorology from a reputable university that teaches meteorology (Univ of Oklahoma), I am really sick and tired of people not giving credit to meteorologists. First, I want to set some facts out:

    1) People on TV usually do not have a BS in meteorology. They are usually journalists, hence, they have not taken the required math and physics that one needs in order to understand that air behaves like a fluid in a nonlinear fashion. Please take the time to distinguish between people that have science degrees and people who do not.

    2) Weather Prediction. For anyone that complains about how meteorologists cannot predict the weather, I would like to see you apply your skills of solving Partial Differential Equations that are extremely complicated in a Lagrangian reference frame. Numerical weather models have to approximate solutions to the complicated PDEs and even have to reduce important terms (Scale Analysis) that, of course, play a significant role in the long term.

    3) The Storm Prediction Center is located in Norman, OK. As an undergraduate... I love to learn about the vertical tilting and stretching of a baroclinically induced horizontal vorticity zone... i.e.. Tornadogenesis. SPC saves lives and employees people that have masters in meteorology. They are highly qualified and are not the usual crapfest that you see on The Weather Channel or local news stations.

    Moof!

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Zebbers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ahem
      your BS in meteorology
      back to you Susan!

    2. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by thedogcow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Bachelors in Science. That was fairly implicit.

      --
      Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    3. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he meant was making a joke and referring to BS of another sense. BullShit, More Shit, Pile it higher and Deeper. ;)

    4. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Fess_Longhair · · Score: 1
      as you can tell from the other posts, \. ers are more impressed by sensational anecdots than our ability to solve coupled nonlinear PDEs.

      if you really want to wow them, mention your skills in FORTRAN, or GEMPAK.

    5. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by louden+obscure · · Score: 2, Funny

      People on TV usually do not have a BS in meteorology.

      i beg to differ. tv weather people have substantial BS when it comes to weather.

      --
      Serenity now, insanity later.
    6. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by thedogcow · · Score: 0, Troll

      Look you pedantic idiot. BS = Bachelors in Science. Geez.

      --
      Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    7. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "For anyone that complains about how meteorologists cannot predict the weather, I would like to see you apply your skills of solving Partial Differential Equations that are extremely complicated in a Lagrangian reference frame."

      You're new here. This is Slashdot. Don't you know you're
      supposed to use a Beowulf Cluster for stuff like that.

    8. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by IdntUnknwn · · Score: 1

      Calm down, calm down. This is Slashdot, how can you expect no one to crack a joke when you mention any form of BS.

    9. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by m1a1 · · Score: 1

      If you are a BS right now then you may not really remember, but there was a time when meteorology was MUCH different than it is right now. I remember watching the weather when I was a kid and it seems to met that it was far, far less accurate than it is now. Detection technology and understand of what to do with the measurements that come from that technology have grown quite a bit. If you pay attention you'll notice that older people make fun of meteorologists quite a bit more than young people. Of course, if you don't notice that then you probably aren't qualified to look for your own ass, let alone a storm.

    10. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Jardine · · Score: 1

      1) People on TV usually do not have a BS in meteorology. They are usually journalists, hence, they have not taken the required math and physics that one needs in order to understand that air behaves like a fluid in a nonlinear fashion. Please take the time to distinguish between people that have science degrees and people who do not.

      You're right, my local forecaster doesn't list a BS in Meteorology. Though he does have a Masters of Science in it. Still manages to get the weather wrong a lot of the time. As you said, it's damned near impossible to predict the weather accurately all the time.

    11. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, look at me! I'm a meterologist! I'm the magical man from weatherland, in a gumdrop house on Lollipop Lane!

    12. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by NineteenSixtyNine · · Score: 0

      But don't mention LISP. They'll just make fun of you and make you cry.

      --

      --
      What would Bill Clinton do?
    13. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The local tv weather guys mainly present whatever info comes from the national weather service you seem to be implying is so much better.

      No matter where the reports come from though, they are still only somewhat reliable, and only in the near future.

    14. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by NewtonTwo · · Score: 1

      1) People on TV usually do not have a BS in meteorology. They are usually journalists ...

      It's a tough sell to convince people (especially slashdotters) that meteorology is a difficult 'science'. A big reason for this is, as you mention, the inability to distinguish an atmospheric scientist from an 'on-air' meteorologist.

      Some 'on-air' do have sufficient education, however, the level of science able to be presented to the general viewing public is virtually nil. This is one reason I pursue research and numerical modeling, making colorful maps and blurting out some temperatures is not my idea of satisfying my ambition. I do however have many colleagues in the science who do take their 'on-air' jobs passionately. Which brings me to another hidden aspect of TV meteorology.

      It has been suggested that most people choose their news channel heavily biased on the weather segment and/or meteorologists. Quite an effort is made to often make the meteorologist the most charming likeable news anchor with all sorts of gimmicks: pets, vacations, trivia, etc.
      This is no secret to producers and station directors and it can often be seen that an over dramatization of certain weather events is created to ensure YOU, the viewer, are tuning into station X instead of station Y. Producers don't care if the forecast is right or wrong, the station wants viewers, which brings advertisers, who pay money...end of story.

      I prefer to tell people to take most weather segments on the news according to how much time they are presented in. Usually a 1 minute intro (teaser) and a 3-5 minute forecast later, sometimes a small 1 minute wrapup at the end...all in all, there's about as much weather on the news as there is commercials and advertising. Quite often both are used to sell you something too. If you're REALLY looking for a detailed forecast, as another poster suggested, go to the NWS page and read the discussions (WARNING: pretty animated icons not included)

    15. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by back_pages · · Score: 1

      If I had a mod point I'd toss you one. For what it's worth, I use predicting the weather as an example of what distributed computing can accomplish that a single processor cannot. (I'm a computer science graduate.) In my experience, this example seems to "click" better than most others and gives people a good intuition about the advantages of large distributed computers.

    16. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by BGJayR · · Score: 1

      Isn't a bachelor in science a BSc. ?

    17. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The main weather guy for WGN (Tom Skilling, or his brother Jeff? Odd how one is a weather forecaster and the other embezzled millions from a corporation...) is a good meteorologist. He seems to do more than just spewing back the NWS regional forecast, which is what most media "forecasters" do.

      At least at wxunderground.com and a few other websites, it is possible to get the information that goes into the NWS forecasts, such as the different computer model predictions, commentary about observations and trends, etc., so one can make up their own mind about what is going to happen in the near future, weather-wise.

    18. Re:Numerical Weather Prediction and others by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      1) People on TV usually do not have a BS in meteorology. They are usually journalists, hence, they have not taken the required math and physics that one needs in order to understand that air behaves like a fluid in a nonlinear fashion.
      They don't need a degree, or the math, or the physics. People on TV aren't 'predicting' the weather they are reporting the information given to them by... meteorologists. Blaming the TV weather folks for poor weather predictions is like blaming a traffic jam on the folks reporting traffic.
      Weather Prediction. For anyone that complains about how meteorologists cannot predict the weather, I would like to see you apply your skills of solving Partial Differential Equations that are extremely complicated in a Lagrangian reference frame. Numerical weather models have to approximate solutions to the complicated PDEs and even have to reduce important terms (Scale Analysis) that, of course, play a significant role in the long term.
      Somehow, they managed to predict the weather semi-accurately without all that back in the 'olden days, and we haven't gotten much better. (Or to put it more simply, your buzzwords don't impress me. We are discussing forecasting whether or not it will rain tommorow, not working out the Earth's climate.)
      The Storm Prediction Center is located in Norman, OK. As an undergraduate... I love to learn about the vertical tilting and stretching of a baroclinically induced horizontal vorticity zone... i.e.. Tornadogenesis. SPC saves lives and employees people that have masters in meteorology. They are highly qualified and are not the usual crapfest that you see on The Weather Channel or local news stations.
      More buzzwords, nonsense and blame shifting.
      As someone who is finishing his BS in Meteorology from a reputable university that teaches meteorology (Univ of Oklahoma), I am really sick and tired of people not giving credit to meteorologists.
      You sir have just abundantly demonstrated why meteorologists don't get credit. Someone asks a simple question, or makes a simple statement, and they get a crapfest in response. You claim to want to get 'facts' out, and what we get is evasion.
  34. Re:Sorry west coast? by Squeamish+Ossifrage · · Score: 1

    Hmmm.... The west coast is a big place, and maybe some it has a lot of lightning. My part sure doesn't. I live in Oregon now, and I've seen less lightning here than anywhere else I've ever lived. So maybe the guy's not totally off-base.

  35. Re:Sorry west coast? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Boo hoo, they don't have power outages in the heat of the day."

    Yes we do, actually. I was in LA a couple of months ago and the heat caused people to run their ACs. Result? Power reserves went really low. When that happens, rolling blackouts have to occur. The only reason the death toll isn't so high is that they are well prepared for it.

    Can't say I blame you for being this misinformed, though. After living here for the last 3 months, I'm findnig some of the Californian stereotypes quite amusing. For example, did you know that LA isn't covered in a dark brown haze that looks like the surface in the Matrix?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  36. just a few weeks ago by jjeffries · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I was at work when a huge thunderstorm rolled in. The wind kicked up and the building my office is in started creaking, the wind whistling over it. The rain started next, coming down almost horizontally.

    There was a flash very big boom, during which a piece of electrical equipment up the street turned into sparks. A moment later, the sky lit up again, this time not white, but blue.

    My office is on the forth floor in a not very big town, so I have pretty good view of a lot of it, and it was lit up as bright as the brightest of sunny days. But blue.

    I believe I saw a flashover, which occurs when lightning hits something electrical, and the electricty within, which had previously been happy doing its thing, jumps out and follows the lightning bolt's path. This can continue for several seconds after the lightning has stopped.

    My girlfriend was there to see this too--in fact, she dropped to her knees and said "that's the scariest thing I've ever seen." And I agree. Lightning is fascinating stuff, and terrifying.

    1. Re:just a few weeks ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >> she dropped to her knees and said "that's the scariest thing I've ever seen."

      Heh, heh, heh.

  37. But... but... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    Getting hit by lightning is never fun ... what if you're flying a kite when it happens?

    Seriously, though... slow news day? This is the type of stuff they run in the papers when noone's found an interesting way to bleed in the past week, or a bad reason to sue some wealthy corporation.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  38. Weather spotting by Chaos Theory by michaeldot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm in Sydney, Australia and I just saw a butterfly flapping its wings. Someone on the other side of the world is about to get a tornado on their doorstep.

  39. Anyone know of a homebrew lightning detector? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    Anything that costs more than $20 tends to get crossed out on the list of cool toys. I've been thinking of building some other weather/geo sensors (even a seismograph) and logging stuff just for the heck of it.

    Speaking of which, is there any way to detect cosmic rays without a university dept backing me up? The things are so rare, that I'd never know it wasn't working....

    1. Re:Anyone know of a homebrew lightning detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A cheap AM "transistor" pocket radio is a good lightning detector. RadioShack used to sell these as "Flavoradios" for about $4.95. You can hear the cracks of lighning pretty good, and the built in ferrite rod antenna can peak and null the signal for a crude fix on the heading.

      The spacing of the cracks, and their amplitude can give you an idea of the storm's strength. It works best during daylight hours because the noise is going to be more local in nature, and not skywave propogation. It's best to get a AM only pocket radio, not the AM/FM jobs.

      And obviously, websites like Weather Underground have regional doppler radar maps which give you a visual of approaching storms.

    2. Re:Anyone know of a homebrew lightning detector? by kingstalemuffins · · Score: 1

      Cosmic rays are rare? I remember seeing a cosmic ray detector at CERN (a large particle collider in Switzerland/France) and that thing went off very rapidily. My point, we are constanly be bombarded by cosmic rays, that is why neutrino detectors are only built deep underground or inside of mountains.

    3. Re:Anyone know of a homebrew lightning detector? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

      I thought a given acre of land might have a 1% chance of a single cosmic ray in any given year. This varies with New Orleans. It'specific to the acre, because the cosmic ray tends to rain it's decay particles straight down, not easy to detect at a significant angle. Warning: This is as I remember it, there is certainly some fraction of bullshit in all this, and I'm not sure which is which.

    4. Re:Anyone know of a homebrew lightning detector? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, after a bit of googling I came up with the following:


      The flux of cosmic rays falls off rapidly as the cosmic ray energy increases. For 1 GeV particles, the rate is about 10,000 per square meter per second. At 1000 GeV (or 1012 eV), the rate is only 1 particle per square meter per second. The rate starts to decrease even more rapidly around 1016 eV (this is the so-called "knee" of the cosmic ray spectrum). At these energies, there are only a few particles per square meter per year. The highest energy particles, above 1019 eV, arrive only at a rate of about one particle per square kilometer per year. The "knee" is itself quite interesting, because we don't yet understand why the spectrum experiences an abrupt change in slope at that point. There is also an "ankle" in the spectrum around 1019 eV, where the rate is found to be somewhat higher than expected.


      So, I guess it depends on what engery ray you are talking about what the flux is. Check out the rest of the site: http://www.auger.org/questions.html
  40. Walter De Maria: Lightning Field by TribeDoktor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you ever get a chance to travel around in the southwest, try to stay at the Lightning Field in New Mexico. It is a rustic stay at the cabins there but it is worth staying there overnight. Even without the lightning strikeing the sculpture it is an awesome site. The field is most active during the summer months past July. http://www.lightningfield.org/ Support the arts!

    1. Re:Walter De Maria: Lightning Field by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      Support the arts!
      It does look like a clever installation, and certainly would be fun to visit during a storm. As far as supporting the arts goes, I was with you until I came across this:
      The Lightning Field is protected by copyright. Photography of the sculpture and the cabin is not permitted. Commissioned, copyrighted slides are available for $30.00 per set of 8, plus $2.00 shipping and handling.
      So I've got to pay $135 to spend the night during storm season (and they not-so-subtly request that I pay more than double this amount as a donation), but I'm not allowed to take a picture while I'm there? If I want a memento, I have to fork over more cash for slides which are conveniently pre-prepared but have nothing to do with my own experience there?

      Sorry, that isn't supporting the arts, that's extortion. Wonder if I can find a good sat photo from TerraServer...
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  41. I'm curious about ball lightning... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    ... but the article doesn't mention anything about it. Does anyone know if there have been serious, repeatable scientific conclusions drawn about it (i.e., effects upon contact, genesis, etc.)? Google is somewhat less than helpful.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:I'm curious about ball lightning... by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1, Troll

      It costs 3 red mana to play and is a 6/1 trampler that can attack the turn on which you summon it. Pretty good card overall.

      . . .

      moderation total: -1 Incredibly lame

  42. Lightning kills cows by scaryfish · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Apparently if lightning strikes near a cow (or any other large quadruped) they can die, simply because the lightning creates enough of a voltage potential in the ground that the difference between their front and hind legs is enough to be lethal.

    Humans, on the other hand, don't have as much of a problem, because their feet are so close together.

    1. Re:Lightning kills cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not sure if this story lends credibility to your assertion, but I know a man who raises cattle and will tell you about the effects of lightning on cattle. A good while ago a group of his cattle were killed when lightning struck the ground near them. Cattle can somewhat sense changes in the weather and act accordingly, so when they felt the storm coming they crowded together in a spot in the pasture. However, this spot happened to located over an iron-ore deposit which the lightning struck and thus killing several of them.

    2. Re:Lightning kills cows by CA_Jim · · Score: 1

      Farside had a strip where some cows all stood on their hind legs unless a car drove by. Apply lightning here, and smart cows stand upright on their hind legs, reducing the voltage potential. Then the lightning is more likely to kill off the stupid, quadruped cows. Evolution in action!

    3. Re:Lightning kills cows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It *doesn't* prevent people from being electrocuted. You can't presume that because jolt goes in one appendage that it's going to exit the same, opposed (on the other side of the body) appendage - it could go from left leg to right arm, etc. But if it does go from one side to the other, it can be dangerous because of the heart.
      Also, there's a term in emergency medicine known as "hamburger breath" - someone whose innerds may have been toasted a bit - and it's obvious when you do smell it - and it's not a good sign of good health. but if it does go from one side of the body to the other, The electricity can leave in any number of places.
      In emergency medicine, there's a term known as "hamburger breath" - someone's gotten some of their insides cooked a little bit.

    4. Re:Lightning kills cows by Junta · · Score: 1

      I would assume it would be more because current sent through one leg to another would take a less lethal path (though a very scary sounding proposition) than from arms to feet... Of course, same applies to standing on your hands. If you were standing on your hands when such a high voltage difference occured and it went through your arms, it would likely go through the heart, or so I have heard.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  43. Re:Sorry west coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shutup with the dispelling of the sterotypes, we made those up so more people wouldn't show up.

    don't listen to NanoGator people, California sterotypes are all true so stay away; San Francisco is all homosexuals, LA air is toxic, californians are all veggie eating smelly hippies, there's no meat in the whole state so stay in nebraska or texas or whatever god forsaken *cough* I mean lovely place that you live in and don't move to California.

  44. 1rst hand experience by jvl001 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My own experience with lightning, for the lack of a better word, was simply awesome and I'm glad it wasn't a closer hit. A thunderstorm developed over the neighbouring fields of my parent's farm and slowly made it's way over our fields. It was an extremely hot and humid day, the sudden down pour settled the dust quickly while the temperature dropped several degrees in a few seconds. I watched a lightning bolt strike the ground in the middle of a flat empty field leaving the ground smoking even though it was raining cats & dogs.

    I happened to be standing at the patio door: bare foot on a forced-air furnace register (vent) which was effectively well-grounded. The next lightning bolt struck a nearby tree or the house. It didn't really matter where it struck. I could literally feel the charge race through my body and make my hair stand on end. The flash and boom were simultaneous.

    A few minutes later we were sitting at the kitchen table. Another close-by strike caused a 6-inch long blue arc that leapt from the electric stove's fuse panel through a stainless pot and grounded out through the stove's element. It also blew out all the lights on that side of the house.

    That was by far the scariest storm I have ever experienced.

    --
    /. is to journalism as graffiti is to a bathroom wall
  45. California by ElliotLee · · Score: 1

    Clear skies and 90 degrees Fahrenheit. Darn, wish I was on the East Coast.

  46. when it strikes sensitive equipment by n0mad6 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm in the control room of one of the detectors at Fermilab where there's a fairly intense storm going on. About 20 minutes ago, a particularly large lightning strike caused the protons and the antiprotons circling the accelerator to alter their orbits enough that we had to shut down parts of the detector while we waited for the beam to settle.

    by pure coincidence I opened my browser to /. while waiting for the voltages to come back up and I see this story up at the top.

    1. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by sinner0423 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, i live a few miles away from where you're currently at. KNOCK IT OFF WITH THE TOMFOOLERY AND THE PROTONS N SUCH. Thanks.

    2. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now *that* is cool!

    3. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by louden+obscure · · Score: 1

      there's nothing like a good 'ole midwestern thunderstorm to put your head on straight. uh, those weather BS guys were predicticting this since five o'clock this afternoon.

      --
      Serenity now, insanity later.
    4. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antiprotons? Are you making antimatter over there? I'd better alert the Swiss Guard before you accumulate enough antimatter to blow up the Vatican.

    5. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Cap'n, the ion storm is causing the antimatter containment to fail!"

    6. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Illuminati are already on the scene.

    7. Re:when it strikes sensitive equipment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just be careful you're not transported to "Another World".

  47. Im guess I am lucky. by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lightening happens around here (west coast) and the coax goes out the window the radios get disconnected from the AC. 10 foot ground rods last about 3 months in this soil. My tower has 4 #10 copper leads anout 10 inches long going to "ground." I am knocking on wood I haven't lost anything to EMF but hams just 2 blocks away have lost rigs and computers to Lightening EMF and leaving stuff connected. Oh and I don't leave the tower cranked up when I am not home or during storms. I hope the path of least ressistance is through the palm tree in my Neighbors yard or the Jupiner in the other ones both which are taller than any antenna usually have up.

    --
    If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
    Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  48. Personal experience by grainofsand · · Score: 1

    I was hit by lightning about 20 years ago in Australia. I was out playing golf when hit in the left arm. Horrendous burns and lots of scars left to this day. No fun at all.

    --
    A dream is good. A plan is better.
  49. Immortal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell this guy is a phony. He left out one of the most important conditions on the web site - the decapitation of an Immortal!

  50. Chlorine pulled toward surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Chlorine in a pool exists as some sort of ion,
    so it carries a charge. Prior to a lightening strike
    or near-strike, you get weird effects on the target
    from charges building up. If one half of the
    chlorine compound (the + or - ion) got pulled to
    the surface by this, you might well see some effects.

    1. Re:Chlorine pulled toward surface? by DarkMantle · · Score: 4, Informative

      I concure with this possability, it may not have been boiling (as per reaching an approx. temp. of 100 degrees C (220 F) but may have appeared to be boiling due to the movement described above.

      This is similar to how microwaves work. Also Ionization is not just used for nuclear fusion, quick question for you...

      Q: If nothing sticks to teflon, how do they get teflon to stick to the pan?
      A: They ionize the pan with a positive (+) charge, and ionize the teflon with a negitive (-) charge and it will stick like the opposing ends of two magnets

      "Physics class is now over, please read pages 121-320 by next class"

      --
      DarkMantle I been bored, so I started a blog.
    2. Re:Chlorine pulled toward surface? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Q: If nothing sticks to teflon, how do they get teflon to stick to the pan?"

      it dosen't just wait a month.

  51. Lightning Season in Alaska by core+plexus · · Score: 1
    The heading states "sorry west coast", but Alaska is the farthest west state in the U.S. (also the farthest north, and east), and it most certainly is lightning season here. You can view the ground strikes on a map online.

    In my area, (Alaska Range) as well as the Interior and the Brooks Range of Arctic Alaska all have very severe storms; I have witnessed them, and the resulting forest fires, firsthand. I have recorded some fierce storms, with lightning, marble-size hail, strong winds, and once I swear was a tornado (I'm from the midwest originally, and know what a funnel cloud looks like).

    -cp-

    Bigfoot Sighted in Yukon

  52. Clearwave by ottergoose · · Score: 1

    I'll soon be getting a Clearwave wireless internet connection... which will result in an antenna mounted on the roof plugged directly into my network.

    I'm guessing it'll be about a year before I have to replace 3 fried computers.

  53. lightning kills trucks dead by n00b_101 · · Score: 2

    I drove semi trucks for several years. In a thunderstorm near Decatur Illinois I saw a bright flash and heard a loud pop the realized my engine was dead. I was able to coast to an off-ramp and park. When I inspected my truck I realized I had no electrical power at all. Finally I took look at my cb antenna which was made of fiberglass and it was melted. Lightning had struck the cb antenna and fried $12,000 dollars worth of electrical components in the semi. The brain box and every sensor on the engine had to be replaced. Funny thing is I was listening to the radio which just happened to be playing REO Speedwagon Riding the Storm Out. AN experience I will never forget.

  54. Clarification - from original poster by ctwxman · · Score: 3, Informative

    When I said West Coast, I meant just that - the coast. Please check this map to see how you rate with thunderstorms

    1. Re:Clarification - from original poster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's surprising to see purple (1-2) regions contiguous with white (70+) regions. All of Antarctica is in the 70+ region (why not refine the scale above 70 then?)

    2. Re:Clarification - from original poster by jeremy9 · · Score: 1

      The areas which are white next to the areas which are purple in fact have no measured lightning. Those two satellites don't even see antarctica. The only part which is 70+ is central africa. It is a confusing scale.

  55. "Vaisala Lightning Explorer" by Atario · · Score: 1

    I was momentarily stunned (Shocked? Har har) when I thought I saw "Visalia Lightning Explorer", being that I'm originally from there and all.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  56. Obligatory Back to The Future Referance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.21 gigawatts? 1.21 gigawatts? Great Scott!

  57. America Is not the only place in the world by pingurslapp · · Score: 2

    Ok America is not the only place in the world that gets lightning, actually NSW Australia gets some of the best action Check out this link http://www.countryenergy.com.au/stormtrk.htm And click the movie button. Thats what i call a pefect lightning storm

    1. Re:America Is not the only place in the world by tricops · · Score: 1

      That looks like one insane storm.... of course Darwin got some pretty insane ones too. My mother used to tell me it was the lightning capital of the world. I'm not sure where she got that from, it doesn't look like it from the different lightning maps linked through all these comments. Ah well.

      --
      (\(\
      (^v^)
      (")")
      This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  58. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, awesome!

  59. Mmm... weather... by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
    I'm also a weather spotter in Chicagoland... it's raining quite a bit right now. I found it kinda funny that two of those links in the story I'd bookmarked...

    Anywho... no interesting stories here, but there's a neat lightning map here. It shows all of the lightning strikes in the nation for the last three hours. Also, if anyone has a "weatherspeak" dictionary, that'd be great. I do a decent job of interpreting NWS forecasts, but crazy stuff like:

    A PLETHORA OF SFC AND UPPER LEVEL FEATURES BEGINNING TO SPAWN
    DEEP MOIST CONVECTION IN NRN IA, WILL EVOLVE INTO A MCS LATER
    TONIGHT AND LIKELY MOVE INTO THE NRN PORTIONS OF THE CWA.
    CONCURRENTLY...
    ...wtf is MCS? CWA? Sometimes they shorten "should" into "shud"... I swear, there's more acronyms there than... developers!
    1. Re:Mmm... weather... by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1
      A PLETHORA OF SFC AND UPPER LEVEL FEATURES BEGINNING TO SPAWN
      DEEP MOIST CONVECTION IN NRN IA, WILL EVOLVE INTO A MCS LATER
      TONIGHT AND LIKELY MOVE INTO THE NRN PORTIONS OF THE CWA.
      CONCURRENTLY... wtf is MCS? CWA?
      Translation (as I can't find this text in Google, I'm assuming IA is Iowa, and that this was a recent advance bulletin regarding weather moving towards Illinois):
      A lot of surface and upper level features beginning to spawn deep moist heat transfer in northern Iowa will evolve into a group of thunderstorms later tonight, and likely move into the northern portions of the area concerned by this bulletin.
      See "A Comprehensive Glossary of Weather Terms for Storm Spotters," by Michael Branick, located here. Further resources are here and here though this list - and the terms they cover - are by no means comprehensive.

      Take pretty much everything with a grain of salt, and try to cross-reference, as all terms aren't defined at all of the references, and some of them aren't what you're looking for. For example, Branick doesn't list "CWA," and AVWX lists it as "Central Weather Authority." In context of the bulletin you posted, "CWA" means "County Warning Area," something none of these references mention. A County Warning Area encompasses multiple counties, often across several states. Go here and find the color-coded region on the map that represents your closest big city; that's your approximate CWA.

      Chicago would be LOT (Lockport, airport code) in Central Region HQ, or http://www.CRH.noaa.gov/LOT . Bookmark that, if you haven't already, and watch the county map the next time there's severe weather in the area. Reload every couple of minutes, and you'll know about any watches, warnings, or statements affecting local counties. Fascinate your friends and family - and who knows, possibly save their lives - by IM'ing "Tornado Warning!" 2 minutes before the sirens go off and 3 minutes before the TV jockey passes the warning along. Fuck the TV weather, noaa.gov is the shit.

      I will admit to sharing your perplexity as to why NOAA doesn't issue more "English" warnings. The only thing I can come up with is that in some cases, time is of the essence, and keeping the transmission as small as possible makes it faster to type and transmit. I'm not sure that quite explains it, though; as when EAS activation is requested for a tornado warning here, all of the cooperating radio stations broadcast a robotic text-to-speech voice reading a quite English version of the warning.

      The bulletins are translated into understandable English at some point before they're broadcast to the public, so why they can't be written that way to begin with, I'm not sure. Maybe it's because NOAA/NWS has outsourced to India? >:)
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  60. With all due respect... by dlelash · · Score: 1

    ... as soon as you tell me where you live, I'm moving somewhere 8,000 miles from there.

  61. Nasty Lightning Strike With Photo Gallery by cap-n+k · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About two weeks ago, during an after-school rehearsal of Macbeth, we heard a sharp clap of thunder as the three witches were reciting "Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn, and caldron bubble....". We were startled at first yet were quickly amused at its timing. One of the actors emerged from the dressing room quite pale and said he saw a flash of light streak along one of the walls.

    After the rehearsal, I returned to the computer lab, sat down at my PC, and noticed that it was powered down... and it wouldn't power up. I wandered into our LAN/Server/Broom/Tool/Ex-Bathroom closet and discovered that 2 servers, 4 PCs, our SDSL router, our 24-port Switch, and the Ethernet port on the motherboard of 10 new PCs were all dead. The PCI NIC in my PC had a crater in it. Our PBX was toast and the 25 and 50-pair phone cables between buildings were severely damaged as well..

    If you'd like to see a short Flash-enabled gallery of the destruction, go here As usual, click on a thumbnail to see a larger image.

    A company that is no longer in business installed our punch-down blocks, and they grounded the blocks to a faucet attached to a copper pipe. The person who did the plumbing on the building said that the copper pipe does not travel far before it continues its run as a PVC pipe. The cable and punch-down block installer did not use a true power ground with a 6-ft spike in the ground. We did have lightning arresters on the blocks, but I found the one connected to our SDSL line charred on the floor. It got blown off the wall (one million volts, 200,000 Amps coming through!) The surge traveled over our data network, not through the AC power supplies.

    I've also been looking at web sites that indicate that there's no conclusive proof that lighting rods are effective deterrents even though they're recommended in many building codes.

    Having fun in Austin,
    A Chief Technical Agonizer

    p.s. We discovered today that the light board in our auditorium also got nailed. It's like "Close Encounters" in there without the tones, but then again, we haven't fully tested the sound board yet. Who knows what we'll find tomorrow !!!

    1. Re:Nasty Lightning Strike With Photo Gallery by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry to hear about the loss.

      I don't have the photo gallery to prove it, but just about 2 weeks ago, I lost a 30GB HD to lightning. It was the first drive I've lost in, oh, 10 years of serious computing (to any problem), and the first serious loss I've ever suffered to lightning.

      Worse, I lost an outlet on the APC surge protector into which my month-old computer is plugged. After the storm had passed (we suffered a brief brownout) I went to power the computers back on, only to find that one wouldn't finish booting and the new one wouldn't do squat when the power button was hit. Thankfully, the latter turned out to be part of the surge protector, the PC is fine.

      I've had plenty of NICs fry over the years, but never a drive or a computer. Losing a drive, and thinking I'd lost an entire machine, that was a wake-up call. Not that it'll stop me from using the computers during thunderstorms...

      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    2. Re:Nasty Lightning Strike With Photo Gallery by Hatta · · Score: 1

      If you'd like to see a short Flash-enabled gallery of the destruction

      Don't you mean Flash-disabled?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Nasty Lightning Strike With Photo Gallery by dlelash · · Score: 1

      That'll teach you to be careful when you put on the Scottish play...

    4. Re:Nasty Lightning Strike With Photo Gallery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Godmother did her dissertation on the stage directions in MacBeth. The oldest existing version doesn't call them "witches" - seems that's a modern interpretation of the original description. (Just an obscure fact I've been waiting to share for decades. Thanks!)

  62. It is obvious... by Barkmullz · · Score: 1


    that this was their first mistake:

    The climbers, high on Exum Ridge, were mainly work buddies from the IT department...

    --
    Ronald said nothing. He flung himself from the room, flung himself upon his horse, and rode madly off in all directions.
  63. Minnesota Soccer by Captain+McCrank · · Score: 1
    When I was a teenager, I refereed D2 and D3 soccer games for the u-17 crowd. I ended up in a rather heated debate with one of the parents after I cancelled a late august afternoon game.

    It was overcast, the temperature was in the low 90's with high humidity and no wind. We were about 35 minutes into the first half when suddenly everyone's hair, both on and off the field began to stick straight up- almost as if they'd been vigorously rubbing balloons across their heads.

    I pretty quickly made up my mind that the last place I wanted to be was on this field with nothing high except for the 8 60 foot tall light poles surrounding the field. My departure was delayed, however, by the home team coach. He was insisting that because there was no smell of Ozone, that we were perfectly safe.

    I didn't see any reason to try and argue with the guy, so I got in my car and left.

  64. We on the west coast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have weather with a small w... Back east (any east of the coast) they have Weather... (big W)

    The humidity is so bad it is like having a wet dog hump your leg all day long.

  65. Thank you, by leobaby · · Score: 0, Redundant

    What an excellent article.

  66. God is speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When lightning strikes, God is speaking. Lightning strikes so often in the United States because God is mad. He hates Southerners, born-again Christians, bible-belt Christians, WASP Christians, all Christians. He hates them. He strikes out because he's lost his temper with these stupid people.

    When that lady in Tennessee decided to sue Janet Jackson over a black nipple, God got very angry. Tennessee will be very hard hit. God is pissed.

    When the Republicans went after Clinton and made a mockery out of the United States, God was wrathful. He will punish the Republicans yet. Maybe with a swarm of locusts.

    God doesn't like George W Bush either, or John Ashcroft, but you already figured that out on your own.

    Boom boom.

  67. Sprites by choas · · Score: 1

    I'm quite surprised nobody has mentioned sprites yet...

    --
    I will work to elevate you, just enough to bring you down
    1. Re:Sprites by barakn · · Score: 1

      i'm surprised you'd mention sprites but not elves, blue jets, blue starters, gnomes, pixies, sprite haloes, and trolls. The ephemeral nature of these events provokes some rather whimsical names.

      --
      "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
  68. Hey, dickhead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The textwraps around on its own. You don't have to put a return in there. Here is how the joke should appear:

    Q: Why did the blonde keep stopping then smile during a lightning storm?

    A: She thought she was getting her picture taken.

    Doesn't that look better than your version? You would have also saved a keystroke because you would have hit the ENTER key one less time.

    Also, your joke is hair-colorist, because it misrepresents dumb blondes.

    1. Re:Hey, dickhead! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well your statement is anti-non-americanist because of the spelling of colour.

  69. Re: Ball Lightning by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    How does ball lightning work? I'm begining to think there is no such thing.
    You've obviously never been to a disco.
    They usually have one of those ball lighting thingees on the ceiling.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  70. Trees by Detritus · · Score: 1

    I just happened to be looking at a tree when it was struck by lightning. I saw a side of the tree trunk glow red for a fraction of a second when the lightning hit the top of the tree. That sort of energy can cause the water/sap to flash to steam, blowing off the outside of the tree.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  71. Pffft! You want lightning? by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 3, Funny

    Come to Jupiter.
    There are lightning discharages here that are larger than your entire planet.
    Discharges around what you call "the Great Red Spot" are particularly beautiful.

    Wait.
    I meant go to Jupiter, not come to Jupiter.
    I, of course, have never been there myself, any more than any of you humans have.

    Wait.
    I meant us humans, not you humans.
    Yeah, that's it.
    Us humans.
    Us humans have never been to Juptier.

    Damn, this vocal entry thing isn't working.
    Computer, don't hit the submit but

    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  72. Five Times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been struck by lightning 5 times, four of thouse times it hurt. All exsept the 4th time when I took my brother to the hospital for his broken leg. I went out side to smoke a sigret when it started to rain I diceded to go in side when I suddenly found my self staring up at the sky with out any feeling in my body. I tried to get up but was unable to move or even breath. I had been struck with so much voltage my heart stoped. You know how freaky it is to be lieing on the ground with out your heart beating. Next thing I rember was staring at a bright white light as I came to. Apprently the defibed me and brought me back. They said I was lucky most people don't survie more then 10 minutes in cartac arreste, I was gone for ~19 minutes. I later found out I was commatosed from lack of O2 and nural truma for about a mounth. I'm just glad to be alive :)

  73. Wow... by unixbugs · · Score: 0

    what a story... can't WAIT for the movie...

    i was almost hit by lighting on a couple of occasions climbing telephone poles. Every other pole in residential areas is supposed to have thick guage ground wire bonded to the strand, but in most cases that wire is severed at the pole by residents or the bond is corroded enough to be innefective. We had a man die just a few years ago on the pole because of a lighting strike.

    As cable and telephone installers we are required to work in the rain and have to wait for the go ahead to wait it out, regardless of how bad it seems out there. We do not get hazard pay, but we do stick together with our radios.

    "Screw Them HaHaa, I ain't getting up there right now..."

    Some customers are unreasonable about this, doing things like demanding cable TV during a hail storm. Take it easy on the cable/telephone guy, unless he REALLY deservers a hard time.

    --
    You are about to give someone a piece of your mind, something which you can ill afford...
  74. Re:Sorry west coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    For example, did you know that LA isn't covered in a dark brown haze that looks like the surface in the Matrix?

    Um, unless something is radically different from the last time I was there, it actually sometimes is covered with a nasty brown haze. I was there for a weekend once. On the first day, you could sit in a particular spot and see the hill maybe 1 mile away. On the following day, you could sit in the same spot and look, and as far as you eyes could tell, the hill no longer existed. That was kinda scary.

    On the subject of stereotypes, when I moved to (northern) California, I did sort of think lots of people would have surfboards. I finally got over this after a while and totally gave up on the concept that anyone I knew would actually be a real surfer dude, admitting to myself that it was just a silly stereotype. Then we hired someone new at work named Mike, and I shared an office with him, and guess what -- before he got into IT, he was a pro surfer. He came to work early most days so if the surf was good he could skip out at 3 or 4pm and head down to the general area of Santa Cruz to catch some waves. (He always knew whether the surf was good because there was some web site with a webcam, and this was about 7 or 8 years ago when webcams were still mostly a neat new idea.)

  75. Sick violations of human rights by the US by t_allardyce · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Ah so when a severl centimeter thick bolt of lightning hits you you have a good chance of surviving (in pain). But when a couple thousend volts hits you in an electric chair you obviously get knocked unconcious instantly every time, which is of course why it needs to stay on for several minutes...

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  76. Arushna O'chenga! by Animaether · · Score: 1

    Just remember to swing the cage when you get caught, should things go wrong in such a situation.

    1. Re:Arushna O'chenga! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking incredible game if I ever saw one. Thanks for reminding me of it, I'll pull my A1200 out of the closet once I get back from weekend vacation. No, I'm not selling.

    2. Re:Arushna O'chenga! by Animaether · · Score: 1

      I can't believe somebody got the reference :D

      And yes, that game was friggin' awesome! I only recently learned there was a follow-up besides the 3D one (which sucked), and I can't wait to find a place/person that has it :)

      Flashback was quite enjoyabe as well.

      end rant.

    3. Re:Arushna O'chenga! by Jonathan_S · · Score: 1
      I can't believe somebody got the reference :D
      That's ok. I couldn't believe it took so long for someone to make the reference. :)
  77. Sprites by Trailwalker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The part of lightening study that fasinates me is the discovery of sprites,a part of a lightening strike that moves spaceward.

    Here is a pic of a sprite.

    This is linked to in a longish article. See under Recent Developments.

  78. Close? Like right outside your window? by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

    http://home.earthlink.net/~leon.gandalf

  79. Aircraft lightning certification by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

    I read a report about a lightning strike that found earth via a glider - IIRC, it travelled from one wingtip to the other via the aileron control linkages. Blew the glider to bits, but both occupants parachuted to safety.

    Most worrying part for me (as a pilot or passenger): The test rigs couldn't crank out enough power to replicate the kind of damage seen. And Recommendation No 99-49 It is recommended that the CAA should request serious consideration, during its participation in the current international review of aircraft lightning certification standards, of the fact that energy levels from positive polarity discharges have been shown to greatly exceed those specified in Advisory Circular AC 20-53A, with the associated implications for the certificated lightning protection assurance of existing and future aircraft designs, particularly those which utilise significant amounts of composite material in their primary and control structures. That's worrying!

    Read the official AAIB report here. Lots of interesting background info on aircraft certification against lightning strikes.

  80. E field by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, the E field across the ground is bad - I knew a caver who was deep inside a cave, and was shocked by the cave wall when a strike hit the ground above.

    That's also why you should NOT lie down on the ground to avoid a strike - instead, you should "become a basketball with feet" - curl up into a ball and balance on the balls of your feet, with your feet as close together as possible (if your balance isn't good enough, then put your feet flat). That way, if a strike hits close to your, the potential across the parts of you in contact with the ground will be at a minimum.

    That's also why equipment connected to radio towers should, ideally, be in a Faraday cage (a closed conductive container) - an E field will not penetrate a (perfect) Faraday cage, and will remain on the outside. (Of course, that "perfect" bit is the hard bit, so some field will leak inside, but nowhere near as much as without.)

    And as a previous poster pointed out, it is the fact that most cars are pretty good Faraday cages that protects you from lightning in a car, not the rubber tires - the lightning jumped an air gap of several hundred metere, what makes you think a few centimeters of rubber are going to stop it?

    Of course, if you are in a modern plastic car....

    Even worse, imagine taking a strike in a Prius or other electric/hybrid electric car with a significant amount of battery....

    1. Re:E field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but without the carbon in the tires, it would probably take a long enough time for the stored energy on the surface of the car (think: leyden jar) to dissipate through the air that when the car stopped and a passenger stepped out of the car, they'd be pretty seriously zapped when they went to close the door, for example.

      Sure, the black rubber is not the most conductive material, especially when compared to metal, but it is enough to allow the stored charge to dissipate back to the ground instead of leaking slowly through the air.

  81. Personal lightning detector by sphealey · · Score: 1
    If you would like to try your own lightning detector, Boltek have a reasonably priced unit. You can use the Boltek software, or there is also a community of third-party add-ons, software, and web sites for the Boltek unit.

    sPh

  82. LIghtning means money by lee+n.+field · · Score: 2, Funny

    I smile as I hear thunder, as it usually means one or more customers on dialup, with no surge protection on their phone line, coming in with toasted modem, dead computer, etc. Ka-ching!

  83. Chinks in your armor by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

    I thought I had done a good job of protecting my station but took a hit last fall. I had my tower and masts tied together and grounded with a total of 6 8 foot ground rods, attached to the tower with #4 bare copper, being careful not to have any sharp bends in the wire. I ran the coaxes into a patch panel which was grounded by 1 inch heavy flat braided copper to my ground rod system. My equipment was plugged into a heavy duty UPS, which was off and disconnected from the wall, and all my antennas were disconnected. When I took the hit, I heard a loud snap in my radio room, lost my VCR and TV reception, but the lights stayed on.

    After the storm I tallied the damage:

    1 motherboard fried
    1 modem fried
    1 VCR Main fuse blown - (was repaired)
    1 Yaesu G5400B rotor box - (repaired blown regulator)
    1 Ham-M Rotor box - blown fuses (repaired)
    1 Astron 50 Amp supply Blown regulator circuit (awaiting repair)
    1 Kenwood TS-440 Major damage-may be totalled
    1 Fax machine (toast)

    Phone Line- Connection was charred at Network Interface. I was switched to a spare pair, but my phone became unusable afterwards when it rained. Verizon has been unwilling/unable to correct the problem. I have since moved into a brand new home next door, and the problem seems to have followed me here as well.

    I suspect that lightning found its way in via the rotor control cable or phone line, I am not sure which (perhaps it was both). In any case, it caused a spike which caused my power supply to apply lethal voltage to my TS-440, and other equipment. I will add bulkhead fittings for my rotor controllers when I rebuild my radio room in the coming months.

    Bruce N3LSY

  84. Takeing pictures of lightning.... by leon.gandalf · · Score: 1

    I had my camcorder setup so I could grab the still frames. I got this shot right outside my window. http://home.earthlink.net/~leon.gandalf

  85. Getting hit by lightning is never fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Getting hit by lightning is never fun..."

    Even if it was SCO?

  86. sorry, that only works for china by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    if a butterfly flaps its wings in sydney, someone is london is going to get pregnant

    i'm just saying

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  87. good stories, but by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    isn't there something about cars being the safest place to be in a lightning storm? due to that effect (sorry physicists for forgetting the term) that the electrical charge on a metal shell is limited to the outside of the shell... no matter how big the charge?

    i've always driven blissfully reassurred through lightning storms because of that effect, but your stories of lightning in cars is causing me to doubt my reassurance, for better or worse!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:good stories, but by v1 · · Score: 1

      Sure, YOU'RE safe. But not the CAR. And yes for those crying "BS", yes, all of those are true, most of them witnessed first-hand.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  88. Re:Weather MythBusters by d474 · · Score: 1

    It's stories like this that give the MYTHBUSTERS their jobs. The stars thing at 2:00pm is a joke. And the blades of grass being shot through a telephone pole...LOL.

    Read my Sig. And if your sources are you, well then.....

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  89. New Mexico? No. by barakn · · Score: 1
    But, anyway- New Mexico has a very high density of lightning, second only to parts of FL

    According to this flash density map, New Mexico has to get in line behind Louisiana, Alabama, Mississippi, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and a handful of other states.

    --
    "I'm so moist I'm sticking to the leather." -Kermit the Frog on The Late Late Show
    1. Re:New Mexico? No. by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 1
      Perhaps things have changed in the past years because of the drought (now in its 7th year). But one of the reasons that Workman et al. built the lightning observatory there was because of the very high lightning density. I understand the location drove his wife nuts.

      As the other /.er noted, they eventually tore down Workman and put up NEW Workman, which is one of the most sterile and ugly buildings I've ever seen. Tech campus has a lot of structural oddities that remain- including a vast solar thermal array on the theater building that cannot be used because all of the valves were installed backwards, and they never had the funds to repair it.

  90. Planes Hit By Lightning by snowbike · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was chasing storms in a plane as part of a research project to study sprites, jets, and other middle-atmosphere lightning. Our plane got into the upper region of a small storm, and we were hit by lightning. We had video cameras going and they didn't even hiccup. Check out a frame grab (the next frame was completely saturated). That pod in the image is the end of our wing (I think this was the Westwind II, but it may have been the Jet Commander).

    Another amazing video is of a plane getting hit by lightning at a Japanese airport--check it here.

    Bottom line: planes can be just like a big hydrometeor from lightning's perspective.

  91. Re: the real explanation by Dr.RealGood · · Score: 1

    Blades of grass thrown through a telephone pole... Unlikely, if not impossible. What probably actually happened is that the pole was bent by the wind, causing the grain in the wood to momentarily expand, opening a crevasse into which the grass blade found its way. Wind lets up, crevasse snaps shut, and viola: grass 'blown through' apparently hard wood. This is the real explanation for the blades of grass and straw that have been found embedded in trees and poles after tornadic storms. You need a good amount of wind to get this phenomenon, but nowhere near as much as it might initially seem to require.

  92. non-lightning-related nitpick by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Cars don't have front quarter panels. They have fenders.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  93. I think for some entertaining lightning demos... by Julz · · Score: 1

    try Doctor Megavolt as seen at Burning Man

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE
  94. Interesting link... about the "space elevator"? by geoswan · · Score: 1
    Interesting link... so what about the space elevator? This link touches on the effects of thunderclouds extending high into the upper atmosphere.

    How would this effect the famous plans for a space elevator?

  95. Lightning Strikes on aircraft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my thirty something years of flying, I had only one direct hit by lightning striking the aircraft. It was on an approach to IND in a B-707, which was frightening all right, but not serious. We were quite few miles from the center of the cell, and the ceiling and visibility were still VFR conditions when it hit. Knocked out our electrical power (Circuit Breakers on the Buss's) but was quickly restored by the FE, landed routinely, cabin all shook up. Another time was in Lockheed Constellation I was flying for Aer Lingus during a 1 year contract. We where picking up static while flying through ice crystals in cloud. Some arcing on the windshield, radios were useless. This was in the prop days when there was no way to fly above the stuff, you had to go through it. All of a sudden, the arcing built up to the point that a huge spark hit us in the nose. A green ball of what I can only call static electricity formed behind the FE's seat, and passed through the closed cockpit door. WEIRD! I could actually feel the charge in my scalp. That was the end of of the cloud, and we broke out into clear WX. Circuit breakers popped all over, essential power was restored, and we kept flying. The FE opened the cockpit door to see how the PAX were doing. What a sight! Most were Priests and Nuns, and the aisle was jammed with them on their knees blessing themselves, and murmuring prayers.

    1. Re:Lightning Strikes on aircraft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The above was by me, Captain Ed. I don't know why my screen name did not appear. I was logged in.

      http://moregleny.com/captainedcartoon.gif

  96. Off-topic musing by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    National Geographic chronicled an amazing story of a lightning strike, and rescue, on Grand Teton."

    I wonder how long it's going to be before the GOP discovers the meaning of Grand Teton and puts a curtain over it, or renames it after the most recent late president.

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  97. One interesting effect by EaterOfDog · · Score: 1

    A couple of years ago, I was reading up on lightning due to a personal interest. In particular, I was wondering why victims (common here in Florida) were often described as having their "shoes blown off." This seems like an oddly comic turn to a rather tragic event. The fact is, it does happen and often. The high voltage passing through the skin instantly turns the surface moisture to steam, with explosive results.

    --

    Crushing my karma one post at a time.
  98. Sailboats lightning, fresh and salt water by lent · · Score: 1
    Sailboats are lightning targets.

    Damage from lightning can be reduced through careful grounding, but not eliminated. 30,000 Amps is a non-trivial current to play with.

    One interesting point is lightning damage while sailing on fresh water the damage is worse than when sailing on salt water!

    A long Video with really neat post-lighting photos at: http://www.thomson.ece.ufl.edu/lightning/video.htm l

    Some good scientific works at:
    http://www.thomson.ece.ufl.edu/lightning/SGEB17.ht ml
    http://www.cdc.gov/nasd/docs/d000001-d000100/d0000 07/d000007.html


  99. Ben Franklin's Lightning Bells Harnessing thepower by lent · · Score: 1

    Ben Franklin, that great lightning pioneer, had
    a cool device that directly used lightning to
    ring bells...