Slashdot Mirror


Moon Rocket Scrubbed and Blown Dry

loid_void writes "Reutersis is reporting that a giant Apollo moon rocket that never got off the ground is about to get a face-lift after years of rusting away in the Texas heat and humidity at the Johnson Space Center. Workers will construct a shelter for the Saturn V rocket and give it the equivalent of a "blow dry" in the first steps to preserve the relic of NASA's golden age, said Allan Needell, Apollo program curator for the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum. The 363-foot-long behemoth has lain on its side in front of JSC since 1977, a favorite sight of tourists, but also a victim of the elements. Instead of launching astronauts to the moon as it was built to do, it has become a slowly fading hulk of peeling paint and corroded metal where birds live and plants sprout, Needell said on Wednesday during a visit to the rocket. "There's a lot of biology growing on there," he said, pointing out streaks of algae staining the rocket's white skin."

305 comments

  1. Sink it as an artificial reef? by KRYnosemg33 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I know large ships are often sunk as artificial reefs.

    How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!

    1. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sink it nose up in 300' deep water.

    2. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by PPGMD · · Score: 2, Insightful
      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!

      No because most people don't realize how massive of an accomplishment it was to get to the moon.

      All of that rocket, fuel, and oxygen to carry the LM, and CSM, which are small in comparison.

    3. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by confused+one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be very un-cool.

    4. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Funny

      About as cool as grinding up the Spinx for an artificial reef.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!


      You say this because... why? There's almost as many (somewhat) complete Saturn V rockets as ships? So many that it's hard to come up with contructive uses for them, maybe?
    6. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by mog007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've been to Kennedy Space Center in Florida, and I've looked at the only unlaunched Saturn V. It's the biggest thing I've ever seen. Sure, I've also been to New York and seen the World Trade Center, the Empire State Building, et el., but people don't put billions of pounds of liquid oxygen inside of the Empire State Building, set it on fire, and fly to the moon with it.

    7. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by grioghar · · Score: 1

      The Spinx? Just saying that word has my tongue in a knot. =P

      --
      Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
    8. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Ianoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now there's an idea to win the X-Prize!

    9. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!


      About as cool as seeing how far it could be shoved up your ass without k-y.

    10. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by djtripp · · Score: 1

      What? Put LOX in the Empire State Building... That would be horrible...

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    11. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by ckd · · Score: 1

      I've seen two of the three unlaunched Saturn V stacks (KSC and JSC -- haven't made it to Marshall yet).

    12. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ya know, I live in Central Florida. I can get to KSC in about 30 minutes and have never gone. How sad is that? I think I'll take a day trip over there sometime and take a peek. It is cool watching the launches from my backyard, though. Even from over here it lights up the sky. Awesome.

    13. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How sad is that? That is sad beyond belief. You should be ashamed.

    14. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet it would still stick out of the water 63 feet!

    15. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 1

      What? Put LOX in the Empire State Building... That would be horrible...
      I'm sure there's plenty there already... along with an lot of cream cheese, red oinions and bagels...
      mmm..... bagels with cream cheese and LOX...

      --
      Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
      -- Cicero
    16. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      Sad, but understandable. Usually, the closer you live to something, the less you visit. I toured DC so much more in a few weekend vacations than I did the 4 months I lived there.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    17. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are actually 4 unlaunched Saturn V rockets. One is on display at the Kennedy Center, One at the US Space and Rocket Center Huntsville, Alabama and one at Johnson and I understand one more exists elsewhere. These were all built and ready for launch when Americans decided to save money going to pay for their "Welfare State" of the 1970's etc.

      If you want to see how big these are, come to the US Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama and there you can see lying down on such rocket and a model standing up. The model is 36 stories tall making it by 25 stories the tallest thing in town other than TV Transmission towers. The fuel tanks for them are so big that a surplus one was made into the dome of the planetarium in Huntsville. The rocket first stage burned 150,000 gallons of fuel a second per each of the 5 engines! I saw the test from my house when I was young. At 9.5 miles range the shaking broke the front window of my house once. The Flames went out about 1 mile or so. It was really quite the thing to see these being transported. In addition I have been on the NASA ships for transporting the boosters.

      Arguing the great cost of such launches is pretty silly when the cost was R&D and Manufacture mostly and that was already out of pocket. This illustrates how STUPID our political discussions get on such issues.

      The B-2 Bomber for example was reported to cost about $2 Billion a plane per the discussion when the project was killed. Actually the production costs were something like $100 Million and the rest was already out of pocket R&D. Ignorant idiots in the media don't understand such things.

      Using the typical Media math the first CPU for a line such as the Pentium V cost something like $1 Billion. The remainder costs just a penny or two to make each. The ammortization would be that if you bought 20 such chips they must cost $50 million a unit. So we shouldn't buy more than 20... Of course buying 100 million units tends to make the cost only $10 a unit... But the reporters would say otherwise.

      This is the high price of moronic reporting. Also when one is at a museum it is often made a claim of the one and only of something when it is not so.

      I came to Huntsville Alabama in 1963 because my father was one of the computer types for the project. I got the inside look see of most of the labs and saw and knew a lot of the inside story on the Saturn rockets. I have also seen the construction of the US parts of the space station and Skylab. Much of this cannot be seen now because Redstone Arsenal is going much more secure. I kind of feel like the old line from the very old movie Camelot.. "Don't let it be forgot.. That once there was a spot..."

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    18. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by jonathanduty · · Score: 1

      "I know large ships are often sunk as artificial reefs.
      How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!"


      Hmmm.. and why we are at it we can just burn all of the history books and art with it. Don't destroy history, it teaches us how to live the future.

    19. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      I don't think that it is the only one. There is a Saturn V at the Space and Rocket Center in Huntsvlle, AL (you know Marshall SFC and Redstone Arsenal fame) that is sitting upright and intact, complete with Apollo capsule and emergency escape system on top. There are also pieces of a second one laid out on the grounds (not sure how complete, I can't remember).

      The one laying down is suffering from deterioration. The Space and Rocket Center is attempting to raise funds to save it and one of their fund raisers is the first reunion of Apollo and Saturn V folks. They are inviting everyone who had anything to do with the Apollo and Saturn V programs to visit and help save the Saturn V rocket.

      Buzz Aldrin will be the featured guest of this reunion. Here is a link to the flyer for the event.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    20. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, the media merely reports on the idiotic political math, where on one day 2+2=4, on another, it's illegal to say 2+2, and on yet another, 2+2=5 or 3, depending on if you're a Demlican or a Republicrat, and which value favors your political party or not.

      Congress makes up the silly numbers, not the Press.

    21. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by ChristTrekker · · Score: 1

      Right. You could stick a light on top - the coolest maritime navigation aid ever. :)

    22. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 1
      Not as cool as letting it grow moss and house birds on land where people can actually see it.

      It would eventually look like a relic from an advanced but long since defunct civilization. The fact that the civilization that produced the rotting behemoth is ours, kinda gets you thinking about our own possible demise...

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    23. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > There are 11 types of people, those who understand binary, those who don't, and those who get the joke...

      Make that 100 types. I get the joke & also understand binary. Of course, anyone who falls under type 11 also falls under type 01... Back to 10 types.

    24. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      Sink the Spinx? Might well sink Ali also....

    25. Re:Sink it as an artificial reef? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is a pretty universal experience. I've lived in Paris, London, Glasgow and Milan (no, my name isn't Yves Saint Lauren). I've visited all the major tourist sites in those cities, but either before I lived there or long after I lived there. When something is on your doorstep you never really get round to it. Also, to state the obvious, when you are on holiday you don't have a million and one other things you should be doing, thus there is time for tourism.

  2. My goodness.... by Mz6 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    "There's a lot of biology growing on there"

    Who talks like that anymore? I mean really. Nobody says, nice engine, there's a lot of friction going on in there".

    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:My goodness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      also, what else grows? "...biology on there" or "...stuff growing on there" would be fine. ok crystals grow, but it still sounds redundant.

    2. Re:My goodness.... by dirkdidit · · Score: 1
      Nobody says, nice engine, there's a lot of friction going on in there
      You'd hope nobody would say that, friction is a good way to ruin a good engine. That's why you're "supposed to" put oil in it. Keyphrase being "supposed to."
    3. Re:My goodness.... by wankledot · · Score: 1

      That doesn't change the fact that there is friction going on. When you create some zero-friction oil, drop me an email.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    4. Re:My goodness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, there is still lots of friction in any engine. Enough so to rob more than 50% of it's power, on average.

      Wanna be rich? Make a polymer like teflon that won't melt under 1100F, and is easily formed into cylinders.

    5. Re:My goodness.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, even that's better. Friction is a physical phenomenon. It does "go on" in an engine just like it goes on anywhere else.

      Biology, however, is the STUDY of life. Consider pointing to the stars and saying "A lot of astronomy goes on up there." That would be claiming the existence of extra-terrestrial intelligence, not stars.

    6. Re:My goodness.... by trentblase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, I just developed that zero-friction oil you mentioned. It must be worth billions, but the government here in Nigeria won't let me release it to the outside world. Tell you what... just send me $10,000 to help smuggle me out and I'll split the proceeds of my invention with you 50/50.

    7. Re:My goodness.... by mwood · · Score: 1

      Oh, dear, I can see it now: someone takes a close look and discovers that all the algae, weeds, etc. are endangered species and organizes a protest to forbid washing the thing. :-P

  3. hrm... by bsDaemon · · Score: 0, Troll

    Step 1: Steel Saturn V
    Step 2: Steel phantom WMD from Iraq
    Step 3: Put up a tent in some desert hell hole
    Step 4: ???
    Step 5: PROFIT!!

    1. Re:hrm... by Mz6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Step 4: Get arrested, thrown in jail and sell your story to the press.

      --
      Hmmm.
    2. Re:hrm... by Kenshin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Step 0: Buy a dictionary.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    3. Re:hrm... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Step 0: Learn how to spell 'steal.'

    4. Re:hrm... by BabyDave · · Score: 4, Funny

      These days, it's more like

      Step 4: Get taken to Guantanamo Bay
      Step 5: ????
      Step 6: ????
      Step 7: ????
      Step 8: ????
      Step 9: ????
      ...

    5. Re:hrm... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      how very cleaver ripping off the comment of AC

    6. Re:hrm... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Very 'cleaver'? Seems you need a dictionary, too.

      Just because a comment is newer than another, that doesn't mean it was read first. Sometimes I have to wait to post a comment. Like _I'm_ going to 'rip off' an _AC_?! Please.

    7. Re:hrm... by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      this is slashdot and you aer w0reid about teh spealing?

    8. Re:hrm... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Hey, it was a joke. Then someone gets on my case, and misspells something doing so, yeah, I'm gonna comment on it. I always go for the easy joke. It's ... easier.

    9. Re:hrm... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or steel one.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    10. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Syntax or semantics, which is more important?

    11. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      i think you meant:

      Step 3: Shoot RPG at women, children, and american soldiers in a disgusting sweaty rage whilst shouting "alah aziz jihad zsa zsa alah!!!" to your wife and 12 year old son hiding behind the fence with their thumbs on the triggers of two IEDs strapped around their waists...
      Step 4: Get taken to Guantanamo Bay
      Step 5: ????
      Step 6: ????
      Step 7: ????
      Step 8: ????
      Step 9: ????

    12. Re:hrm... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      The word is "steal", you moron.

    13. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's more like this

      Step 4: Get taken to Guantanamo Bay
      Step 5:
      Step 6:
      Step 7:
      Step 8:
      Step 9: ...

    14. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude. It's the same guy responsible for "cleaver" and "steel". He still needs a dictionary.

    15. Re:hrm... by thbigr · · Score: 1

      My Gawd! You are correcting other people to. At least its not like you hate me personally. Just in general?

      --
      Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
    16. Re:hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's too.

    17. Re:hrm... by Mindless+Drone · · Score: 1
      Steel - A generally hard, strong, durable, malleable alloy of iron and carbon, usually containing between 0.2 and 1.5 percent carbon, often with other constituents such as manganese, chromium, nickel, molybdenum, copper, tungsten, cobalt, or silicon, depending on the desired alloy properties, and widely used as a structural material.

      STEAL - To take (the property of another) without right or permission.

    18. Re:hrm... by thbigr · · Score: 1

      what is wrong with you people?

      --
      Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
    19. Re:hrm... by mwood · · Score: 1

      We paid attention in third-grade spelling class. What's wrong with you?

    20. Re:hrm... by thbigr · · Score: 1

      English, and all languages are defined by those who use them.

      I would like to think of my self as a radical element encouranging the growth of English.

      Now if slashdot had a spell check.....

      --
      Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
    21. Re:hrm... by JessLeah · · Score: 1

      No, smart-ass, that doesn't mean that if a million idiots on the Internet say "to" when they mean "too", that they are correct.

    22. Re:hrm... by thbigr · · Score: 1

      yes they do. So there.

      --
      Come the revolution, the Bourgeois, Capitalistic, "A PARKING STICKER HOLDERS", will be first against the wall!
  4. Jump back! by TigerTale · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean we used to go to the Moon?

    1. Re:Jump back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Poignant

    2. Re:Jump back! by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Of course not. Everyone knows it was all a hoax. Why do you think the Saturn V never got off the ground?

    3. Re:Jump back! by Dausha · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, we didn't. Some people thought it would be a cool prank to spend billions of US dollars to set up a sound stage in Nevada and fake it. They hint at this during Diamonds Are Forever and other sources.

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    4. Re:Jump back! by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      Was the subject of a movie "Capricorn One"

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077294/

      Which not only starred OJ "I was a bad man" Simpson, but also both of Babs husbands, Gould and Brolin.

  5. What a waste by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all the people who fuss and complain about the money spent on actual space programs, this is a great example of the kind of wastefulness that goes on. And, now, rather than reuse or slag it, even more money will be spent to clean it up and display it. I'd rather see it broken apart, melted and recycled in more useful form than have a never-used moon rocket sitting in a museum.

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:What a waste by Nakito · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd rather see it broken apart, melted and recycled in more useful form than have a never-used moon rocket sitting in a museum.

      Going to the moon may have been the greatest single physical achievement of the human race. There are only three remaining examples of the engine that took us there. This is one of them. I say, let's keep it.

    2. Re:What a waste by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yah, God only knows how terrible it would be to preserve a piece of history!

      And we'll we're at it, let's tear down the Washington Monument and make a Parking Garage there! No need to waste all that space and stone when we could make something useful of it...

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, because the used rockets make such good museum pieces..

      But you're right, there's no sense in remembering things from the past. We should have melted down the Spirit of St. Louis, it has no place taking up space in a building.

      In fact, that whole Smithsonian thing is such a waste! All that valuable real estate, wasted by useless relics of the past.

      .. I really should add something to make it entirely clear I'm being sarcastic.

      "Those who don't learn history are doomed to repeat it's mistakes." - paraphrased from someone famous.

    4. Re:What a waste by Snowdog668 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd have to agree with you here. Especially since according to the article there's two other Saturn V's on display at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida and Marshall Space Center in Alabama. If it were the only one left in existance I might be able to see spending the cash. Since this would be the third museum piece I think that the money would be better spent elsewhere.

      --
      I wouldn't say I'm a bad gambler but the last time I went to Vegas I even lost a buck on the soda machine.
    5. Re:What a waste by MoxCamel · · Score: 2, Insightful
      For all the people who fuss and complain about the money spent on actual space programs, this is a great example of the kind of wastefulness that goes on.

      I agree! And all those stupid dinosaur bones cluttering up our museums...toss em! And all those damned paintings in the Looo-ver--digitize the damn things and burn em. Waste of space!

      ...is what I would have said if I were as ignorant as the original poster. There's probably more than a few scientists and/or astronauts who started down their career path by looking up at that piece of "waste," and thinking how wonderful it would be to be a part of something that great. Some things have more value than just their raw materials.

    6. Re:What a waste by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      You remind me of something I once read. I will post samples of it below so you can see if you agree.

      "Too many idealists have lost sight of reality and flat out can't see how unreal their proposals are. "

    7. Re:What a waste by wankledot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Don't you think it would cost significantly more money to break it up and recycle it, just to get some Al and Fe that could be had elsewhere easier and cheaper?

      The fact that it was not used 30 years ago is wasteful, but recycling it now would be even more of a waste.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    8. Re:What a waste by PPGMD · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly. As a kid I remember standing in front of this rocket at JSC, and saying, "Wow!" Here was the object that took our men to the moon, quite possibly the largest moving vehicle that I have ever seen.

      Years later when I was attending Embry-Riddle in Daytona Beach, I flew down to Titusville to see a friend. I went by the KSC during the evening (before the post 9-11 lock down), here in that night, I could almost feel the power, it was almost as moving as when I was a kid.

      Without the past, people have nothing to aspire to, for most people what's in the books is simply writing, it's no more real than Lord of the Rings, but if you put a kid in the rocket park down there, history comes alive, here is what you are reading about, not just in words, but in towering moments to the men that rode them.

      It inspired me, I would gladly pay for them to be around to inspire future generations.

    9. Re:What a waste by charboy1 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see it broken apart, melted and recycled in more useful form than have a never-used moon rocket sitting in a museum.

      But then how could Space Center Houston make any money? The Saturn V is a major attraction in the JSC tram tour. I think the web site (sorry for the music) gives you the right flavor. PLEASE remember that Space Center Houston is not NASA.

      - charboy

    10. Re:What a waste by NewNole2001 · · Score: 1

      Go see the one they have hung up at the Kennedy Space Center, you'll be in awe and pissed that you ever made this comment.

    11. Re:What a waste by cmowire · · Score: 1

      Perhaps.

      But think about stuff 200-300 years in the future. What happens if a freak explosion, huricane, earthquake, etc. shreads through KSC or MSC and ruins one of the Saturn Vs? Over 10 years, not too likely, but over hundreds? Would you really want the one at JSC to be the only one that escaped destruction, yet somebody melted it down to cut costs?

    12. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a stupid fucking idiot.

    13. Re:What a waste by pr0fess · · Score: 1

      I remember my first time at JSC. Looking at the rocket, with longhorns in a field next to it. Quite a contrast.

    14. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rocket park is open to the public. For free. In fact, you can drive by and look at it in your private automobile.
      Space Center is authorized by NASA, and is in fact the only way members of the general public can enter JSC and for instance, sit in the VIP area of Mission Control.

    15. Re:What a waste by orim · · Score: 1

      I fully agree. Anyone who's had to drive in/through DC would agree that an extra garage would certainly help, especially on the Mall.

      All them museums are taking up a lot of space too...

      --
      "If you could only see what I've seen with your eyes..." - Roy Batty
    16. Re:What a waste by SarekOfVulcan · · Score: 1
      If it were the only one left in existance I might be able to see spending the cash.


      Uhh... you mean you _want_ to wait until there's only one left?

      I'll bet you don't do backups on your production server, either.
    17. Re:What a waste by saroth2 · · Score: 1

      The plans for the Saturn V were already destroyed as part of the space shuttle program, making it near impossible to build another one. Destroying the only way to regain the plans would be a disrespect to the engineers who created them.

    18. Re:What a waste by djtripp · · Score: 1

      Hell, the 1 and 1/4 F1 engines they have on display at the Smithsonian are freakin huge (the use of mirrors complete the remaing 3 and 3/4s and it's still spectacular)

      --
      "This is you left and that's your left. This is your right and that's your right. You're gonna die!
    19. Re:What a waste by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Putting aside ranting about preserving history, the real truth is it's good for business. With awe inspiring relics like this laying around, new generations of people will become interested in space flight and continue the movement into space.

    20. Re:What a waste by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I wonder how long it's going to take the treehuggers to catch wind of this and start complaining about how we're putting birds out of their homes.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    21. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Correction: the Alabama Saturn V is at the Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, not at Marshall.

      Also, it's the one laying down at the back of the property. The vertical Saturn V is a replica.

    22. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I say lets build another and go back. Not going back is like the Vikings and the Spaniards going to the Americas once and never returning. Humans have always pushed the boundaries further back. But now it just seems we're lazy and greedy. I also think we should do more to explore the oceans. That's just as challenging. Imagine what we could learn.

    23. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was attending Embry-Riddle in Daytona Beach, I flew down to Titusville to see a friend"

      Umm, that's a less than two and a half-hour drive, and you flew? They let you do that just to see a friend?

    24. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think going from a walking-ape stance to a tin-man-walking stance is one of the greatest physical achievements of manking, if not THE achievement. Funny, even my wife has reverted to cave man posture.

    25. Re:What a waste by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Umm, that's a less than two and a half-hour drive, and you flew?"

      The "A" in "ERAU" stands for "Aeronautical." You go there to either learn how to fly planes, fix planes or build planes. When he says he "flew down to Titusville" he meant he flew the plane himself, most likely in one of the school's airplanes (they practically own Daytona Beach International).

      If you want to fly jumbo jets for a living you need to rack up a lot of hours before the FAA lets you, to the point where it's pretty common to work for the school as a flight instructor for a while after you graduate. In order to rack up flying hours you need to... well... fly an airplane. And that's what the school's fleet of airplanes is for.

      At any rate, as an engineering major I'm amazed that an aerosci student figured out how to turn on a computer, let alone stumble onto Slashdot. :)

    26. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      repeat it's mistakes

      "its".
      No apostrophe.

      And Santayana isn't famous, although he should be.

    27. Re:What a waste by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you want to be a terrorist studying flying. ERAU has a little history with that.

    28. Re:What a waste by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      " The plans for the Saturn V were already destroyed as part of the space shuttle program"

      Wrong. They're at Marshall on microfilm. http://www.faqs.org/faqs/space/controversy/ (scroll down)

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    29. Re:What a waste by gi-tux · · Score: 1

      Not likely that a hurricane will hit Huntsville and MSFC. However, it is quite likely that a tornado could go through (in the 100 year picture). We here in Huntsville sit in the second tornado alley. But we have two here, one that is upright and complete and one that is laying down as I mentioned in an earlier post.

      I agree that we need to preserve these rockets. They stand (or lay) as a challenge to us all that we should return. Our desire to explore has been tainted with a need for security. We as a people in a desire for safety have forced those with a desire to explore to fit into our needs.

      I personally would have climbed into a shuttle the day after Challenger or Columbia either one and been ready to launch (unfortunately I am not an astronaut). I would happily sit on top of a Saturn V today (assuming it was closely inspected and refurbished as needed) for a ride into space.

      We must preserve these monuments to our greatness, as that could be the end.

      --
      I have no sig, does anyone have one to spare?
    30. Re:What a waste by mwood · · Score: 1

      I can't think of a better use for it than to clean it up and continue to remind ourselves that once upon a time we had the guts to do something really splendid.

    31. Re:What a waste by mwood · · Score: 1

      Sure, burn down all the museums, raze all the libraries. None of them have anything to do with making granola so they're useless.

      Not!

    32. Re:What a waste by mwood · · Score: 1

      See, that's exactly the problem. You glorify exploration and the drive to understand that way, and sooner or later some kid is going to want to do some himself. And we can't have that, can we.

      Stuff 'em down the memory hole -- we've got more important things to do than learn.

    33. Re:What a waste by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      At any rate, as an engineering major I'm amazed that an aerosci student figured out how to turn on a computer, let alone stumble onto Slashdot. :)

      Haha, I was an AE major, that lasted about a semester once I got into the AE classes. The drafting class, though I got an A made me rethink my major.

      But he is correct, though I didn't use a Riddle aircraft, they are too freaking expensive with too many SOP restrictions attached, I hear that they are worse now.

      I was checked out with a couple of FBOs and flew a Cessna down to KTIX.

      Shit I flew everywhere, didn't even need a reason, just needed money, which I was always lacking.

    34. Re:What a waste by PPGMD · · Score: 1
      Or if you want to be a terrorist studying flying. ERAU has a little history with that.

      Low blow, ouch.

      The FBI investigated the suspected terrorist, it ended up that the alum simply had the same name, and was alive and well flying for a major airline in South America.

      Riddle was just as hard with the shock, and hit harder because one of the airline pilots that died in the four planes was an alumni. Also a few students had friend and loved ones that died in the attacks, since Riddle student body is not nearly as geographically concentrated compared to many schools.

    35. Re:What a waste by metamatic · · Score: 1

      "Wow"?

      I *literally cried* when I saw the Saturn V at the Kennedy Space Center.

      Worthless piece of scrap? I don't think so.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    36. Re:What a waste by metamatic · · Score: 1

      That's nothing, those stupid Egyptians have *three* great pyramids. Why those idiots haven't torn down the other two I'll never know.

      --
      GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    37. Re:What a waste by dajalas · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see it broken apart, melted and recycled
      Going to the moon was a great effort and accomplishment. Then the whole thing was abandoned.
      I've walked around the Saturn V. For me, it's a profoundly sad place.

  6. NASA's golden age? by Pi_0's+don't+shower · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have to object to referring to the 1960's/70's as NASA's golden age. Surely, that should be regarded as NASA's infancy, and that NASA's golden age may be yet to come? Maybe it's too optimistic, but I'm a 25 year old astrophysics grad student, and I know how much is out there waiting to be explored and examined -- I don't want to have to live my life in the belief that my industry's best days were before I was born!

    1. Re:NASA's golden age? by cerebralsugar · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not too optimistic at all, it just won't be done by NASA. Everyone who has seen Star Trek knows we will have to have a 3rd world war first, and then a drunken scientist resembling James Cromwell will invent warp drive in an alcoholic haze. Then of course, Starfleet will be borne, and we will all want to shag either that vulcan girl and that hot african communications lady.

      --
      Easy guys, I put my pants on one leg at a time. The difference is after I put on my pants I make gold records!
    2. Re:NASA's golden age? by cmowire · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It all depends.

      The 60s/70s are definately the infancy of humanity in space. They hopefully are *not* the only golden age of humanity in space.

      They may, however, be the golden age of NASA, when NASA could do no wrong.

      It all depends on the next 20 years, I'd say. Will NASA continue to be the only road to space, or will National Geographic or the Discovery Channel be able to mount their own space missions? I mean, the last space IMAX film made 50 million. That doesn't buy you much now, but if launch costs are down, you might be able to fund a mission just for the IMAX film.

      It's really an open question for me if the government, academia, or private industry is best suited to really explore space. Each one has their drawbacks, but so far the government has been in the driver's seat.

      So yeah, there's probably room for a even-more-golden age in the future (call it the palladium age ;) ) but it may not be at NASA's behest.

      Our current Babylon-5-esque best hope for space is probably the garage hacking of Scaled COmposites and Armadillo Aerospace.

    3. Re:NASA's golden age? by Sounder40 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thank goodness for kids like you, because I've lost hope of ever seeing space. As a kid, the goal of space travel for us all seemed so close. We were sending men to the moon all the time, so how long would it take until we could all go?

      As a kid, I grew up wanting to work at NASA like my dad. He worked at JSC (used to be "Manned" Space Center before being renamed after LBJ) from 1963 until 1990. I worked in and around JSC and Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Al. for 15 years, and, believe me, a lot of the optimism is gone. It's become too much of a business run by big companies. With the appointment of Sean O'Keefe, I hope that things change. Time will tell.

      --
      A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    4. Re:NASA's golden age? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1


      The 60s/70s are definately the infancy of humanity in space. They hopefully are *not* the only golden age of humanity in space.

      They may, however, be the golden age of NASA, when NASA could do no wrong.


      It was also a time period when NASA was properly funded and (mostly) ran by the guys with sliderules in their pockets. Today's NASA has the potential. But it'll take funding and a major overhaul. I don't see how either will happen.
    5. Re:NASA's golden age? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the councelor with the large nacelles, and the borg with the large implants.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    6. Re:NASA's golden age? by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      The term "golden age" is a way of looking at the history of a thing, then picking the sweet spot.

      Having said that, the golden age of NASA was probably about 1967 to 197x? Just before and after we walked on the moon.

      How can I define this range? Because that's when even the lowliest NASA geek had status second to none, except for the astronauts; And status will get you laid.

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    7. Re:NASA's golden age? by Billy+the+Mountain · · Score: 1

      ...we will all want to shag either that vulcan girl...

      Oh yeah! Pieces of Eight! Mmmm!

      BTM

      --
      That was the turning point of my life--I went from negative zero to positive zero.
    8. Re:NASA's golden age? by loid_void · · Score: 1

      Just want to say that I think after the golden age comes the Platinum Age, your industy's best days are yet to come!

      --
      Anyone seen my jagged little pill?
    9. Re:NASA's golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no way 'Star Trek' is OUR future. Ignoring for a moment all the bad dates and optimistic technology, if it were, all the episodes they went back in time they would have been recognized.

      'Hey, that UFO looks just like the ship from Star Trek!'

    10. Re:NASA's golden age? by hobbesmaster · · Score: 1

      Pffft, the Trills in DS9 are hotter than the vulcan girl or Uhura. :P

    11. Re:NASA's golden age? by cmowire · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem is, it's harder than you think.

      The real thing that limits space exploration is pretty much cost per pound to orbit. Because it's so damn expensive, you have to make all kinds of nasty comprimizes.

      The problem is that the shuttle never lived up to its promise. It takes far too many people to keep it going and far too expensive.

      The best solution is to retire the shuttle sooner rather than later, stop spaceflight for a few years, and develop something new. However, in doing so, you run the decided risk of being a budget cut target in Congress (And Congressional budget issues is what made the shuttle suck in the first place) and the entire manned space program shut down.

      It doesn't help that the Russians can't keep the ISS going forever with just Soyuz and Progress capsules and that they are, in general, not the best of partners. So if the shuttle is out for another few years, it's highly likely that the ISS will end up like Skylab, which ends up with another hunk of money wasted.

      The problem is, NASA wasn't paid to do things *right* it was paid to do things *fast* and *cheap*. So most of the chances to make the space program more of a long-term thing were passed up, even when they were properly funded and run by the guys with sliderules.

    12. Re:NASA's golden age? by PepsiProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Ironically enough, according to star trek lore, the first human to build a warp capable craft builds it in a Saturn V after the 3rd world war. But then again it also says there were supposed to be wars over eugenics in the mid-late 90s

      --
      "The United States has no right, no desire, and no intention to impose our form of government on anyone else." - Bush 05
    13. Re:NASA's golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ironically enough, according to star trek lore, the first human to build a warp capable craft builds it in a Saturn V after the 3rd world war.

      It was a Titan, not a Saturn.

    14. Re:NASA's golden age? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      I have to object to referring to the 1960's/70's as NASA's golden age.

      A golden age is period in a field of endeavour where great tasks were accomplished. The term originated from early Greek and Roman poets who used to refer to a time when mankind lived in a utopia and was pure.

      First men in space, first men on the moon, first probes to other planets: Great tasks.

      A golden age is a time that came before ours in which things were better. Men were real men, women were real women, and small fury creatures from Alpha Centauri were real small fury creatures from Alpha Centauri!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    15. Re:NASA's golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) You don't have an 'industry'. You have an academic mutual wank-fest. There's a difference.
      2) Prepare to learn a few useful skills, such as 'May I take your order?' and 'I know I owe 250,00 dollars to the university, can you deduct payments from my social insurance checks?'
      3) You'll never work on anything as grand as Apollo. Somehow, sending a Wal-Mart r/c toy to Mars doesn't have the same oomph.
      4) Have a nice day.

    16. Re:NASA's golden age? by JCY · · Score: 1

      I agree that NASA will not bring this "Golden Age" on its own.
      Our space agency here in Canada is always doing stuff in the schools.
      And I often hear of tours and seminars on lots of sujects, given by some of our astronauts that have gone up, scientists, engineers and astronomers.
      Cooperation and shareing is the only way to get to that "Golden Age" that's still to come.

    17. Re:NASA's golden age? by DudeG · · Score: 1

      Scaled Composites and Armadillo are great teams, but don't forget StarChaser, the British team who have already accomplished a heck of a lot, and have started building their X-Prize rocket.

      They're realistic; they know that SC is possibly close to winning the prize, but they haven't won it yet. StarChaser is currently focussing on the X-Prize, but their plan doesn't rely on the prize itself. They recognise that whoever wins the prize, the publicity generated will help open up the market for space tourism and (more generally) private micro-satellite launches.

      StarChaser's design has been deliberately designed with scalability in mind; it won't require immense amounts of work to build bigger versions. This is all part of their long-term plan. After all, they were in the business before the X-Prize was announced.

      StarChaser, Scaled and Armadillo are all doing great work. Best of luck to all of them, whoever ends up getting the prize.

    18. Re:NASA's golden age? by Flounder · · Score: 1
      Sorry for the troll, but...

      A Canadian Space Agency????

      Red Green, Bob & Doug MacKenzie, and Hockey Night in Canada, and this country has a SPACE PROGRAM??

      --

      No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    19. Re:NASA's golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With the appointment of Sean O'Keefe, I hope that things change.
      I saw O'Keefe testify before congress.
      He seems like an ass-kissing sycophant.
      His flip-flopping on the Hubble rescue doesn't increase my respect for him, either.
    20. Re:NASA's golden age? by mwood · · Score: 1

      That looks like becoming the new direction at NASA: transfer the solved problems to industry and get back into the business of doing stuff that doesn't yet have a market value.

    21. Re:NASA's golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, who did you think designed those nifty arms for the Space Shuttle and ISS?

    22. Re:NASA's golden age? by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

      A Canadian Space Agency????

      Red Green, Bob & Doug MacKenzie, and Hockey Night in Canada, and this country has a SPACE PROGRAM??


      You *do* know Captain Kirk was Canadian...?

      (Quebecois, to be exact)

      --
      Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    23. Re:NASA's golden age? by japhmi · · Score: 1

      You *do* know Captain Kirk was Canadian...?

      No, William Shatner is Canadian, Captain Kirk was from Iowa.

      --
      "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys" P. J. O'Rourke
    24. Re:NASA's golden age? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and we will all want to shag either that vulcan girl and that hot african communications lady.

      Due to the subtle, subconscious shift in your wording, substituting "and" where "or" would have been correct, it appears you don't want either, but rather both. Here, here.

    25. Re:NASA's golden age? by MrNixon · · Score: 1

      Whoa. You mean that a television show isn't real? But, but .... my mother always told me to belive everything I see on the teevee.

      Thanks for pointing that out, I mean, what would have happened had I gone on believing that Star Trek is real?

  7. Kansas Cosmosphere by OverlordQ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if they'll have any involvement. After all they single-handedly restored the Liberty Bell 7 (their link here. And also helped with the restoration of the Apollo 13 as well. When you tought of Kansas, you probably didn't think of space now did ya?

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sad to say, but I just went through JSC a couple of weeks ago, and I really wasn't impressed.

      This is Johnson freaking Space CENTER for crying out loud - yet the items they had on display at the visitor's center weren't much better than the items in the Hall Of Space at the Cosmosphere - in many ways KSC has them beat (KSC's Redstone rocket is in better shape, KSC has an SR-71 in addition to the T-38, KSC has the original Apollo "White Room").

      Look, JSC *is* NASA - KSC is a private sector organization in the middle of Kansas (more or less).

      It just doesn't seem right for me to be walking around JSC's visitor center saying "Yawn. Ho-hum. Got anything better?"

    2. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you tought of Kansas, you probably didn't think of space now did ya?

      Having suffered through several cross-Kansas drives during Summer vacation trips as a kid, I can tell you there is just about nothing *but* space in Kansas. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    3. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Yea :-/ kinda sux.

      Reno residents still get in free? I might have to stop in my next trip back 'home' :)

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you ever drive I-70 through eastern CO and KS, you'll see signs indicating that a community is the home of an astronaut. I always wondered if there was a skewed distribution of astronauts coming out of the rural areas.

    5. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by admiralh · · Score: 1

      I have no statistics to back this up, but since the astronauts were converted test pilots, they all had a "Need For Speed". Since it is much easier to race cars or whatever in rural areas, it makes sense that the test pilots come from this general background, too.

      For what it's worth, Ohio's two famous astronauts (Neil Armstrong and John Glenn) are both from rural areas.

      --
      Hopelessly pedantic since 1963.
    6. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by grioghar · · Score: 1

      Psssh. I live in Kansas. While I'm not going to bust out on some fanatical allegiance to The Sunflower State, I still got to stand up and say this is still a good state, if a little Republican at times, with plenty to do and see.

      I-70 towards Hays sucks though. I know it'll get modded down, blah blah, but someone's gotta take a stand. =P

      --
      Can you ping me now? Gooood! | Manhappenin.Net - Things to do
    7. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Reno, as I am a Sedgwick County resident, but I fork over the bucks every year to be a member, so I get into the Hall of Space for no additional fee anyway.

      I told CleverNickName about the KSC - he was looking for things to do on his next trip into Tulsa for a SF con (posted in his Journal), and I told him a detour north would be a good idea. Now, the question is, will Wil do it?

    8. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      You just took the wrong routes.

      Don't take I-70 - it IS drive-a-fork-through-your-skull boring.

      Take US 160 through the Gypsum hills.

      Take I35 through the Flint Hills.

      Even the bit of Route 66 that is in Kansas is pretty.

    9. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      Heh, who knows :)

      Only bad thing about KSC is when Ary left. Without him, KSC wouldn't have hardly anything :)

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    10. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by jelle · · Score: 1

      "KSC is a private sector organization in the middle of Kansas (more or less)."

      Hold on, are you talking about the same KSC that I'm thinking of? That already has an actual saturn V rocket on display inside of an air-conditioned building together with the actual launch control room equipment? Note that the KSC I'm talking about is in Florida, not in Kansas, not even more or less...

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    11. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by sjalex · · Score: 1

      FWIW the visitor center at JSC is not run by nasa but by a third party non-profit corp and it is mostly there to entertain children imho.

    12. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      JSC used to be a great place to visit - it was built as an actual working site, so it wasn't touristy, and there were a number of real things to see, like mockups for various future missions, and the huge vacuum test chamber. There weren't that many restricted areas, so if you knew where to look, the sights were terrific (and if you knew somebody there, the tour was even better).

      But they were getting so much traffic, they had to start restricting stuff. They (actually some private company) built 'Space Center Houston' (yeech) to try to divert some of the traffic, and cut off even more areas.

      When 9/11 happened, the whole place became a major restricted area. Anything interesting is locked down, only the leftovers are visible. Rocket Park is the most interesting thing you can get to.

    13. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      No, I am not talking about Kennedy Space Center.

      If you had looked at the subject line, you might have noticed the word "Kansas" there.

      If you had read the posts, you might have noticed this link.

      In short, if you had paid attention, you might have not needed to post your message.

    14. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had paid attention, nowhere on the Kansas Cosmosphere website do they abbreviate themselves as "KSC". Moron.

    15. Re:Kansas Cosmosphere by jelle · · Score: 1

      Well, wiseguy, FYI, I did notice you used the word "Kansas", and that you were using the acronym KSC. As space centers go, KSC stands for the one in Florida, and not for anything in Kansas, as shown by the page www.ksc.nasa.gov. I thought that would be clear from my posting, but I must have overestimated something.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  8. An important piece of history by Sean80 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Obviously, for any geek worth their stripes, the Saturn V rockets are a pretty awesome piece of history. Well, for this geek at least. It honestly surprises me that they let it come to this in the first place. Does anybody know what the condition of the other 2 is? How was it that this one was not deemed historically significant enough to be taken of?

    Although I've lived in the US for a few years now, I've never had the opportunity to go see some of this stuff. Seeing this thing cleaned up and in a permanent display will definitely be worth the price of admission.

    1. Re:An important piece of history by wiljefv · · Score: 1

      I agree it is a great tribute to determination and ingenuity of man. Maybe it should be on display on more of a world stage so that all mankind can remember and be proud of the accomplishment.

    2. Re:An important piece of history by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      WTF does 'world stage" mean? Anyone can travel to Texas and see the damn thing.

      How do you get more open than that?

    3. Re:An important piece of history by mojotoad · · Score: 1
      I just recently visited with the one on display at the Space Museum in Huntsville, AL (my home town, actually). It seems to be suffering a similar fate, but I didn't notice lots of "biology" in the thing.

      There is a restoration project for Huntsville's Saturn V as well.

      Matt

    4. Re:An important piece of history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was it that this one was not deemed historically significant enough to be taken of?

      Because LBJ died, and Dubya's in the Other party?

    5. Re:An important piece of history by Gunfighter · · Score: 3, Informative

      With most of the Saturn V rockets weathering away thanks to the elements, I can not stress what a difference it can make to actually go to the Kennedy Space Center and see the restored Saturn V inside the (air conditioned... thank heavens) Apollo/Saturn V Center. Not only do you get the to see the rocket itself, but they also have a full blown tour complete with a view of the launch pads and (for us geeks) the actual consoles used at launch control. Definitely worth a visit.

      Side note: If you stay in the Cocoa Beach area overnight, make sure you book yourself on the big casino cruise boat for that evening. Even if you don't gamble, it's free, fun, and the buffet rocks.

      --
      -- Stu

      /. ID under 2,000. I feel old now.
    6. Re:An important piece of history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born and raised in the USA, and even I'M afraid of Texans! I can understand how the Europeans feel.

    7. Re:An important piece of history by willith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wikipedia has an extremely informative entry on the Saturn V, which includes a neat table of Saturn V launches and a note about the three Saturn Vs on display. Quoting:

      Currently there are three Saturn Vs on display:

      * At the Johnson Space Center made up of first stage of SA-514, the second stage from SA-515 and the third stage from SA-513

      * At the Kennedy Space Center made up of S-IC-T and the second and third stages from SA-514

      * At the US Space & Rocket Center, Huntsville, Alabama made up of S-IC-D, S-II-F/D and S-IVB-D (all test stages not meant for actual flight)

      Of these three, only the one at the Johnson Space Center is fully comprised of stages that were meant to be launched.

      The third stage of the JSC Saturn V is the one that was removed from SA-513 in 1973 to make room for Skylab.

      I've lived in Clear Lake for my whole life, and the Saturn V at JSC is a familiar landmark. I can't imagine my drive to work without it, and it's a good thing that NASA is going to clean it up. It is a truly awesome sight.

    8. Re:An important piece of history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those that fear texans may also vist the MSFC near Huntsville, AL or The Cape in Florida. Each of the visitors' centers have real Saturn Vs.

  9. Let's make it into a diner! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Funny

    And in honor of the Saturn V incredible amount of thrust, we'll only serve partially-cooked Mexican food, broccoli and Velamints!

  10. Speaking as a wreck diver... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be a bit crap actually.

    Ships have doors and are built for people to wander around and are highly accessible when sunk. Sinking an overgrown fuel cylinder to dive around would be about as interesting as watching 'The Sphere'...

  11. Re:NASA's golden age?We just need more people to c by Manhigh · · Score: 1

    Agreed. Mod Parent Up.

    We need goals. I want to live my life trying to do something big for humanity. Too many people these days see their job as a necessary evil to getting a paycheck.

    --
    "Open the pod by doors, Hal" > "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave" sudo "Open the pod bay doors, Hal" > alright
  12. not a waste- good for morale and education by jpnews · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live in Houston and I've visited JSC a lot of times through the years. The Saturn V is in bad condition, and has been steadily getting worse. Something surely needs to be done.

    And to those who have called it a waste of resources, I have only this to say. All the money in the world won't be of any use if we don't create another generation of engineers and scientists. I've personally seen the look in a kid's eyes when they get up close to something enormous and meaningful. You just can't buy that.

    1. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by switcha · · Score: 1
      I know your opinion will be a popular one in a pro-tech, largely childless arena like /., but we also can't create the next generation of engineers and scientists when there's not even enough textbooks for the kids.

      In our districts, the kids have to take turns checking out, and studying from, the horrendously outdated textbooks the school does have.

      A textbook. You just can buy that.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    2. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Actually, you CAN buy that, if the money is spent on restoring the Saturn V...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by RTMFD · · Score: 1

      I've personally seen the look in a kid's eyes when they get up close to something enormous ...

      I think we just found Michael Jackson's Slashdot ID!!! *rimshot*

    4. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by jpnews · · Score: 1

      "...we also can't create the next generation of engineers and scientists when there's not even enough textbooks for the kids."
      Right. And if given the choice between using $X million to fix a relic of the space age, or buying textbooks, I'd choose the latter.

      But that's not the choice I see. The choice I see is to either maintain or ignore an important (and still useful, as I said in the parent post) piece of history.

    5. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by switcha · · Score: 1
      Good point. And therein lies the fallacy in mine and any argument that thinks these funds should be used for something else. The fact is that it's not Robin Hood shit we're dealing with here. The budgets for space gizmos and school supplies start way up high were things aren't easily diverted to something else instead.

      Sigh. What can one do? Oh, that's right. Vote.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    6. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by fingusernames · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the JSC is a federal facility, and this work is probably being paid for with federal funds. School textbooks are the province of the state governments. One is not the business of the other.

      Larry

    7. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      How many textbooks could be printed and how many Saturn V rockets could be cleaned for the $80 billion (or maybe much more by now) spent for a desert adventure of an aging wannabe general?

      I saw the Saturn V on display in Houston, and it was impressive; an inspiring reminder of things that were and things that could be. The peeling paint and blooming rust were an allegory of the contemporary state of the space program...

      There is enough money. They are just misspent.

    8. Re:not a waste- good for morale and education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the real choice for the text books probably comes every spring or fall, in the form of yet another school tax levy or whatever it's called in your area. If you're complaining about text books, then I would imagine you probably live in an area where the levies are regularly not approved, either because of voter apathy (not enough votes) or actual defeat.

      And I just moved to Oregon, the state last year that threatened to begin summer vacation about a month early, until the Dept. of Education stepped in and threatened to pull fed money because students weren't in school long enough for the school year... Oh, and the voters turned down a state tax measure that would hopefully have raised enough $$$ for the schools (at least, until the politicians figured out how to redirect and reappropriate the increased tax revenues).

  13. YES! by Sounder40 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I drive past it several times a week (down Saturn Drive for the locals), and it just makes me sick to see it in the shape it's in. Thank God it's finally going to be taken care of and treated as the treasure it is. The pictures don't do justice to the damage being done to the ship.

    By the way, as a teenager, I was horrified to hear that they were going to display it on its side. I thought for sure that it was going to be displayed upright. What a dweeb I was (am?). Yeah, that would be great: make it so you could only see the bottom. And then there's the problems it would cause with low-flying aircraft, (lots of them, including those annoying advertizement-pulling planes). Oh, and we get hurricanes down here in these parts.

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    1. Re:YES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It should be standing straight up.

      A little bit of reinforcement, and a tower or two, and boom. Standing proudly. 300' isn't THAT tall.

      But, it's good that its getting some nice treatment now. Awesome piece.

    2. Re:YES! by nanter · · Score: 3, Informative
      In Huntsville, Alabama, they have an old Saturn rocket that is displayed upright at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center.

      Quite a sight when flying in. You you weren't that much of a dweeb for thinking they would do the same with that rocket.

    3. Re:YES! by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 1

      Well, get used to the idea that you won't be seeing the Saturn V anymore, just a huge, generic looking warehouse. That's what they did to the Saturn V at Kennedy. The building is just -barely- bigger than the Saturn V, so you can't even see the whole thing at once. But you do get a really nice look at the spectacular restoration on smaller (ha!) sections up-close. I just wish they would have made the building about 50% longer and wider. Oh, and eliminated the 37 gift-shops inside. Yikes.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
  14. Re:Finally something nasa engineers can do by nizo · · Score: 1
    It's taken them several years and untold billions of dollars, but finally NASA has a project they can handle. *drum roll* they can re-paint a 30yr old rocket. I'm glad my tax dollars and american pride is so well invested.

    Maybe they can get corporate sponsors to paint logos on the side to help defer the cost of upkeep? Nothing says 'merica like a big McDonald's M(tm) on the side of an unused million dollar rocket.

  15. Heh by Mitchell+Mebane · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Did anybody else read that as 'Moon Scrubbed and Blown Dry'? :P

    --

    The roots of education are bitter, but the fruit is sweet.
    --Aristotle
    1. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Isn't that interesting?

    2. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I did. Isn't that interesting? AC Punk...

    3. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      AC Punk...

      Mr Pot, meet Mr Kettle!

    4. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope! I guess you're the only loser who can't read.

      ps: posting shit like "I read the headline as foo bar! LOL" is even older and more tired than the soviet russia and duke nukem forever crap that seems to be on every other slashdot post these days.

    5. Re:Heh by futuretaikonaut · · Score: 1

      Leave it to /. editors to use a word that's also a synonym that means to cancel a rocket flight. And here I was wondering how I hadn't heard about a moon mission and why the mission was 'scrubbed'...

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. glory days behind us by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    The sad fact is, that not only are the glory days of NASA behind us, but the glory days in general are behind us. I, for one, have an extreamly bleak outlook on the future, and I am sure I am not alone.

    1. Re:glory days behind us by Manhigh · · Score: 1

      I agree with boredman. It sounds corny, but we control our destiny. If we want the future to be bright, we have to make it so.

      Especially the technology minded/geeky/typical slashdot readers. Many of us are in fields that will have a strong effect on the future. Lets hope that effect is positive for humanity.

      --
      "Open the pod by doors, Hal" > "I'm afraid I can't do that, Dave" sudo "Open the pod bay doors, Hal" > alright
    2. Re:glory days behind us by mwood · · Score: 1

      Well, keep it to yourself until you get over it. Some of us still believe that we are capable of great things if we're willing to do the work.

  18. Novel use for old rocket by OriginalArlen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Surely it's obvious that, in the interests of science, this rocket should be renovated, refueled, and have a Chevy Impala tacked on the top, where it lies.

    --

    Everything I needed to know about life, I learnt from Blake's Seven
  19. Re:Finally something nasa engineers can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Million? Probably the better part of a billion- even in 1960's dollars.

  20. Reutersis? by sharkdba · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Reutersis is reporting that a giant Apollo moon rocket...

    For a while I thought that Reuter got a sister I don't know about...

    --
    The purpose of life is to find the purpose of life.
    1. Re:Reutersis? by My_Dirty_Facist_Ass · · Score: 0

      Is she cute?

    2. Re:Reutersis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, reutersis sounds more like a urinary tract ailment to me.

  21. I partially agree......... by reality-bytes · · Score: 1
    All the money in the world won't be of any use if we don't create another generation of engineers and scientists. I've personally seen the look in a kid's eyes when they get up close to something enormous and meaningful. You just can't buy that.


    I agree that we need projects and items which inspire the current generation to believe that will still have the ability to get out and explore. I also believe that it is the likes of daring private projects such as Scaled Composites who best serve this need.

    I know that 'Space Ship One' is by no means an orbital system but what about its succesors?

    Lighting bloody-great big fireworks and pointing them in the general direction of orbit is probably not the most efficient means of getting anywhere.

    We need to be exploring new ideas and concepts rather that always referring to the 'good old days' of the point and pray rockets.

    I agree, that as a homage to the histroy of the early space-age a Saturn V should be preserved in near-perfect viewable condition. However, if the money for preservation could alternatively be channeled back into r&d, then preserving more than one example of a complete Saturn V would be wasteful.
    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:I partially agree......... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The link you provided took me to "seeq.com", which appears to be a search engine/web portal of some kind.

      On the good side, whoever designed the page had both functioning color vision and basic understanding of style, making it a pretty pleasant page to look at. On the bad side, it doesn't appear to have anything to do with space exploration.

      The Scaled Composites web side can be found here.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  22. Re:Finally something nasa engineers can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1 funny to minamar and nizo.

    Don't they just sound like a slapstick comedy team?
    And with uid's of 786261 and 81281, they'll get the hard-core and the ne0phytes.

  23. *cough*ahem by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

    I've personally seen the look in a kid's eyes when they get up close to something enormous

    Michael Jackson beggs to differ.

    1. Re:*cough*ahem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your joke failed because:
      a:\> You only used five words and misspeellled one.
      b:\> Michael Jackson isn't enormous.
      c:\> Why would Michael Jackson have any clue about what jpnews has and hasn't seen?

      Read your comment again. It doesn't work, at all. Please proof read your comments before hitting submint. You''ll catch lots of errrors..

  24. One in Huntsville, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    A similar effort is under way at the U.S. Space and Rocket Center in Huntsville, Alabama. In fact, they've created a special license plate to help raise funds. Otherwise, the Smithsonian has threatened to take the Saturn V back. (Which would certainly be an interesting sight.) You can see the license plate at the bottom of this page.

  25. Plastic by DaveKAO · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought Saturn's used plastic body panels and therefore couldn't rust? Oh wait... that's the car company.

  26. JSC's Relics by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

    Slag history. Nice troll.

    Most of the public will never see all of JSC's relics. The center is a small museum in itself. Tucked away in various display cases at different locations are relics and images from NASA's history. Rocket Park is the most publicly-accessable and visible example (with the historical Mission Control being a close second). However, there are also everything from space suits to models of early Shuttle designs used in anechoic chamber tests on display in buildings only accessable by NASA employees.

    Granted - JSC is no Smithsonian Air and Space Museum. But there are a lot of small, neat things to see if you ever get the chance.

  27. do something useful by real+gumby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The best way to honor the memory of "NASA's golden age" would be to top it.

    NASA does excellent unmanned science, but the moon shot, cool as it was, wasn't good science or space policy.

    Good thing private efforts are starting to pick up the slack.

    I must add that the most awe-inspiring thing to me is that all the construction, design and launch was done on slide rules.

    1. Re:do something useful by cmowire · · Score: 1

      I'd beg to differ about the science thing.

      We know a lot more about it because of the manned landings than we did because of all of the *unmanned* probes. When's the last time you heard about any real results from anybody *but* the apollo astronauts and the folks who analized the stuff they brought back.

      Although I'd definately agree it wasn't especially good space policy.

      I'm not surprised about the whole slide rule thing, really. Longer calculations mean that you get it 85% right and robust instead of trying to get it 100% right.

  28. Re:Another waste of money by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What do you think happened to that money? They laminated $100 bills and used that for the skin?

    No. A whole bunch of contractor companies were hired to design, build, and test parts of it. Companies that hired people. Thousands of skilled people. People that got paid a good salary for a good days work. People that supported tens of thousands of other people by buying food, clothes, cars, houses.

    So it didn't get used. The budget and interest ran out. A shame, but not like the money was wasted.

    What would you prefer we have done with that money? Collect taxes and merely give it away?

  29. Re:Finally something nasa engineers can do by nizo · · Score: 1

    Everytime I see my UID I think of the Van Halen OU812 album for some reason.....

  30. Re:Another waste of money by Flying+Purple+Wombat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They ought to auction it on ebay. I wonder what it would go for...

    --
    If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
  31. Thank God? by DaveKAO · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you mean thank the American tax payer?

    1. Re:Thank God? by Sounder40 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess you're right. Slip of the keyboard... ;-)

      --
      A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
  32. Saturn V Engines by Sounder40 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was at Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Al., they used to test the SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engines) at a test stand a few miles from my building. I was amazed at the power and noise of the SSMEs until an oldtimer told me what it was like when they tested one of the Saturn V engines: He said your coffee cup would literally bounce off of the desk, and forget talking on the phone during a test fire. And that was just the one engine. Imagine what it was like when they all fired at the same time...

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
    1. Re:Saturn V Engines by domodude · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All of that testing actually worked. Not one of the 32 Saturn V rockets ever exploded; this is amazing when you think of how there are literally millions of parts that could break and cause a critical failure. Wernher von Braun, who also helped with the German V2 rocket, truly was a genius.

    2. Re:Saturn V Engines by demonbug · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was curious, so I looked up the output of the Shuttle's main engines compared to the Saturn V main engines.
      The shuttle's main engines produce a maximum of 488,000 pounds of thrust. The Saturn V main engines produced a total of 7.5 million pounds of thrust, or 1.5 million pounds per engine. So it looks like each engine on the Saturn V was about 3 times as powerful as each of the main engines on the shuttle.
      Oh, the solid rocket boosters on the shuttle each produce 3.3 million pounds of thrust.

    3. Re:Saturn V Engines by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      True, but they did have one unmanned launch (before Apollo 8; SA-502, IIRC) that, between vibrations and engine shutdowns, was one hairy launch.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    4. Re:Saturn V Engines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apollo 6. Serious pogo problem in the 2nd (?) stage.

      Another reason why I think the Apollo 8 astronauts (next SV launch, first around the moon) had some of the biggest cojones in history :-)

    5. Re:Saturn V Engines by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      The link takes you to a Wikipedia article on Apollo 6:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_6

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    6. Re:Saturn V Engines by LogicHoleFlaw · · Score: 1

      My grandfather worked on the Saturn V rockets. He told me that when they ran the first engine test they had to send out radio warnings to the 5 surrounding counties that this was not, in fact, a nuclear explosion.

      Pretty amazing.

      --
      -- Flaw
  33. Reutersis? by sunilonline · · Score: 1

    Is that some new type of disease?

  34. rusting? by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

    "after years of rusting away"

    rusty titanium?

    Surely its not made of ferrous metal?
    or even got much ferrous metal in it...?

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:rusting? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      Aluminum alloy for the skin. Maybe what appears to be rust streaks are red colored dust streaks.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    2. Re:rusting? by TheQuestion · · Score: 1

      The dang thing was destined to burn up in the atmosphere anyway, so why waste Titanium on it. It just needed to hold together long enough to get the capsule on its way to the moon.

      How come no one has brought up the truly sad thing about these 3 Saturn Vs? The fact that we had already paid for and constructed 3 complete Saturn Vs and we never launched them! NASA saved the manpower and fuel costs only by canceling Apollo 18, 19 and 20. Can you imagine what we would have learned on those last couple of missions? To quote Jack Schmidt, the only actual scientist to go to the moon, "...we were just starting to get good at it."

      Just another reason to hate Richard Nixon.

  35. No way that $4M could be better spent.../sarcasm by cryophan · · Score: 1

    Cant we find a better way to spend $4M, like cancer research. Anyway, I only support the space program for real and cost-efficient research, meaning we need to stop sending up humans.

  36. Whoa! by Trogdorsey · · Score: 1

    That'll the longest blow job ever

  37. Re:Another waste of money by irontiki · · Score: 1

    Whole industries got a boost or were even created with that money...computers.

    The Tang industry is still benefiting mankind as well as other lots of other stuff too.

  38. Re:Another waste of money by Apage43 · · Score: 1

    Auction a Saturn V on eBay? Think of the shipping cost!

  39. Re:Great pick-up line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot inspired pickup lines are the most effective contraceptive there is.

  40. "Scrubbed and Blown Dry" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My girlfriend does it to me nightly.

  41. Re:I wonder... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1
    bsDaemon said

    Step 1: Steel Saturn V

    Step 2: Steel phantom WMD from Iraq

    Step 3: Put up a tent in some desert hell hole

    Step 4: ???

    Step 5: PROFIT!!



    I think Step 4 is "SteAl Spell Checker"... or perhaps I'm just not reading right. The Saturn V might be steel and the WMD's might be steel as well...

  42. Re:Great pick-up line... by .com+b4+.storm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only one who sees this as a great pick up line?
    [. . .]
    Random gal: *SLAP*

    This is why us geeks can't get chicks. Our definition of a "great" pickup line is the one that generates the hardest slap. :)

    --
    "Wow, you're like some kind of superhero able to ward off happiness and success at every turn."
    -- Ryan Stiles
  43. Rocket "scrubbed" and "blown dry" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And in the movie version, Asia Cararre plays the museum staff with Ron Jeremy as the Apollo Rocket....

  44. What a waste, indeed. by StarKruzr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It made me sad, actually. Something kept telling me "this ship was supposed to go to the moon, and it's here because it didn't."

    Call me sentimental, but she looked like a giant failure of human exploration to me.

    --

    +++ATH0
    1. Re:What a waste, indeed. by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps in the grand scheme of things that one rocket's purpose is to remind us of what we've accomplished before, and to inspire us to further greatness.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    2. Re:What a waste, indeed. by ultranova · · Score: 1
      Perhaps in the grand scheme of things that one rocket's purpose is to remind us of what we've accomplished before, and to inspire us to further greatness.

      Or perhaps it's purpose is to sit there and remind us of all the broken promises of space exploration.

      I recently read an old book, called "Space Traveller's Handbook". It had been printed 1979, and was a kind of fictional history book, pretending to be from the year 2061, and detailing a history of ever-incresing space flight that, as we now know, never happened.

      The book told about growing commercial traffick, falling prices, reaching ever outwards. It had detailed and (as far as I can tell) sensible explanations of asteroid mining and space colonies. It even had the first interstellar spacecraft (Voyager doesn't count, since it won't move any functional instrument throught interstellar space), which used a nuclear fusion pulse engine.

      As I said, none of this happened. Space technology is still in its infancy and doesn't seem to be advancing much. We haven't been to the moon for decades and have no moonbases. There is no commercial space traffick. X-prize is almost unknown to the general public. We still use chemical rockets, which require ridicilous amounts of fuel and explode randomly. We don't dare use nuclear rockets for fear of accidents or sabotage.

      The moon mission was for nothing, and it accomplished nothing. Just a show for politics, discarded like yesterdays garbage once it had served that purpose.

      Whenever I read these old books which looked to the future with such optimism, I want to cry.

      BTW. Does anyone know any free open source CAD programs ? Just so I'll be ready when the Y-prize competition starts ;).

      Open source space vechile development - you know, that might actually work, if we can make a good enough distributed simulator...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:What a waste, indeed. by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      I never read that book, but as a kid I remember Apollo 11. As I was growing up, I used to dream about the days that we'd be bopping around the moon for a vacation. And for a while, while I was still really young I used to belive that it'd happen in my lifetime.

      Of course the reality of the space program and my own maturity have taken those dreams away. Yet I'm still sad when I think about how little we've progressed in regard to space exploration.

      My daughter loves my space pictures, her favorite is the one of Buzz Aldrin standing before the US flag (the one where you can see his head through his facemeask), and she says that she wants to walk on the moon too. She's only 3 but she's starting to enjoy looking at stars and she looks for the moon every night. So she's into it, and I'm trying to teach her as much as she can understand.

      I don't know if people HER age will go up there in their lifetimes.

      I get the sense that NASA won't be the entity to make it happen. Maybe these X-Prize guys will get it going. I hope someone does. If she can go, that's good enough for me.

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
  45. Re:Another waste of money by Elentar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a good statement to be made here about the implied social contract that a representative government makes with it's citizens. As the US population continues to grow, the percentage of people with no marketable skills will likewise continue to increase. And if our society is going to support the idea that we can keep producing more people despite the fact that there are less resources available for them, we need to find a way to keep everyone happy and feeling productive, without overburdening the government or creating a negative social status (welfare).

    Put simply, the government needs to be able to support people who want to be artists, writers, musicians, hobbyists, explorers, naturalists, scientists, inventors, or any other interest that involves individual dedication and creativity. The product of the work those people do would be public domain, benefitting everyone, without consuming many resources or putting taxpayer's money to poor use. Meanwhile, anyone with a line on a normal form of employment or who wished to retain ownership of their works would follow the normal, self-supported way of life we all try to have today. Anybody could choose which path to take, and the cost of the system is not as high as you think - it doesn't take much money to pay someone a basic income to relax at home and write poetry. And by supporting people's interests we would be encouraging people to follow them, rather than paying based on the number of children a welfare family can crank out, as we do today.

    Until recently, Oxford, Cambridge and other universities in the UK were completely free for citizens to attend. Graduates of those institutions could go on to hold a post with the government, researching various things for a moderate income for all their lives. This is the way things should be, not requiring students to pay hundreds of thousand of dollars to feed the over-inflated salaries of university administrators and who then must accept positions that often encourage them to bend their ethics for the purposes of a greedy individual or corporation.

    The government _SHOULD_ be "wasting" millions of dollars paying people to do things like develop a space program. It has benefited us all and cost us much less than the 'war on terror', which has left us only with degraded individual freedoms, dead men and women from mostly lower-income families and more millions into the bank accounts of the businessmen who engineered the whole thing. Thank you, Cheney.

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  46. KSC's Saturn V is immaculate and educational by mr_rangr · · Score: 1

    It got its own center about 7 years ago. You have to take the KSC Bus Tour to see it. It's in pristine condition, and each of its segments is labeled and described. It's a shame that the KSC site doesn't have a better picture of their Saturn V, but I have one here.

  47. Beware of self-fulfilling prophecies by boredman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Corny as this may sound, bleak outlooks on the future, however "justified," tend to produce bleak futures. The inverse is also true.

    As I've said in more than a few other space related threads, I became an engineer because of Apollo. Despite my mild depression, the space program has instilled in me a sense of optimism and purpose I just can't shake. As long as there are bright people with big dreams, we're in for greater days, I promise.

    On a more personal note, if you're young, remember that your life is just beginning and, given enough hard work, courage, and luck, you might just help bring about the next golden age.

    If you're older, and forgive me because I can't help but be rude here, please don't infect our youth with that nonsense. They need all the hope they can get.

    1. Re:Beware of self-fulfilling prophecies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      This quote from a newspaper upon the Apollo 11 landing tends to sum it up for me:
      The Eugene Register-Guard of Oregon and Managing Editor William L.K. Wasmann call the landing "a triumph made possible by men of vision in every race and time." His front-page editorial continues: "If Sunday's Moonwalk shows enough men the nobility man is capable of, then we may have hope for mankind yet."
      And this:
      Apollo 11 enacted the story of an audacious purpose, its execution, its triumph, and the means that achieved it - the story and the demonstration of man's highest potential... an achievement of man in his capacity as a rational being - an achievement of reason, of logic, of mathematics, of total dedication to the absolutism of reality... The mission was a moral code enacted in space.- Ayn Rand
  48. Re:Great pick-up line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *that* was funny? Who's modding today, Bob Saget?

  49. Re:Great pick-up line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a rocket in your pocket, or are you just happy to see me?

  50. insert obligatory dagblamint gubmint statement by gelfling · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why are we spending precious money that could be better spent either giving it to corporations or proving that the moon landing was a fake

  51. What about the birdies? by Greg+Larkin · · Score: 1

    What I'd like to know is what's to become of the birds and other small animals that call the rocket their home? Is it time to give PETA a call and sic 'em on NASA?

    --

    SourceHosting.net, LLC
    Ready. Set. Code.
    http://www.sourcehosting.net/
    1. Re:What about the birdies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe that comment earned you 50 /. enemies and maybe, just maybe, one fan.

      Birds should know their place, and it isn't in a Saturn V.

      Stupid birds.

      "And to celebrate, NASA will be having a BBQ on the front lawn of the JSC..."

  52. Jeez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This here slab of inanimate metal gets a wash and a blow-job, and here I am, alone at home on a thursday night.

    It just ain't fair.

  53. State of the rocket by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Up until a couple of years ago, I used to work for IBM on Space Park Drive in Houston (you can see the rocket as you drive out of the parking lot of Building 8). Any visitors I had would inevitably get a trip around JSC.

    The rocket is not in good shape - there are holes in it, and the paintwork is cracking and peeling. It was quite sad really. Good they are doing some work on it.

    1. Re:State of the rocket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I saw it I thought its decay was kind of romantic in a way... a sort of humbling expression of the mortality of something so powerful and unforgettable.

      Let it be, I say. And why stand it up? I think folks understand that a rocket is only stood up in preparation for launch. When i was a kid i liked having the opportunity to get up close to see all of it... top to bottom. To be limited to just the first three feet of the bottom of the nozzle would be a shame.

      Anyway I think the 4 million dollars would be better spent protecting the critically endangered wildlife in Florida.

  54. Wow! by Walker2323 · · Score: 1

    Sounds expensive. Last time my rocket was scrubbed and blown dry it cost me under a hundred bucks.

  55. Apollo 18 by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I worked at the Johnson Space Center for two years, back in 1976-1978, and I was there when they brought in the Saturn V.

    This was actual flight hardware that was supposed to have gone to the moon for the Apollo 18 mission. When they brought it in, it still had red "Remove before flight" tags hanging from various places.

    I am ... really annoyed, saddened, and angry that NASA has let this vehicle rot away.

    1. Re:Apollo 18 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i don't think NASA wanted it to rot away. And I'm sure the assigned Apollo 18 astronauts didn't either. Maybe this is a public trick--restore a 30 year old beast and THEN use it :) maybe engle (only fair, schmitt took his spot) brand and gordan are still up for it? :)

  56. Re:Another waste of money by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1
    Well that sounds nice and all, but do you have any idea what would happen if everybody could just choose to write poetry all day and draw a salary for it? Presumably, society can only afford a certain number of poetry writers - either there has to be a market for their poetry (in books, anthologies, as songs, or something) or they have to find their way into the university system and teach others as well as writing their own poetry.


    I don't think this part of our system is so bad. I do agree with you that forcing people into massive debt so they have no choice but to take jobs in investment banking, management consulting, technology, or go to law school, med school or something. That basically sums up about 80% of my graduating class at Harvard.


    Many of the best and brightest people I knew at Harvard didn't go into academia, though some still have plans to go back in that direction after a while. That's sad - some of these people would have been able to make some really great contributions to humanity, but the financial imperatives of our society exert a lot of pressure. Instead, they will do big deals, move around a lot of money, get big clients and drive nice cars. Hopefully some of them (like me) will start companies that bring new products to market and make peoples lives better in small ways.

  57. Obligatory Simpsons reference by OneFootIn · · Score: 1

    Some dude: "There's no air in space." Homer: "But there's an Air 'n' Space Museum."

  58. Half Empty Much? by susano_otter · · Score: 1

    So if every single Saturn built had made it into orbit, would you have considered the Apollo project a gaint success of human exploration?

    So not all the Saturns got launched. I feel sad for this particular rocket, since its sole purpose in life was never realized, but the project itself was still successful--giantly so!

    And even this sad, unfulfilled engine of discovery can still find a purpose: to remain here on Earth, to stand as a monument to human exploration, and inspire in all who visit the sense of greatness appropriate to the endeavor it represents.

    But you know, hey, feel free to be bummed out about the whole thing, if that's what turns you on.

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Half Empty Much? by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1
      And even this sad, unfulfilled engine of discovery can still find a purpose: to remain here on Earth, to stand as a monument to human exploration, and inspire in all who visit the sense of greatness appropriate to the endeavor it represents.

      AGREED! Maybe some kid will see it on a trip with his folks and think "Hey! The dumb dicks that run this country got it wrong" and vow to himself then and there to change it. Objects like this inspire those kinds of life-changing moments in those at pivotal points in their lives. If nothing else it was testament to the ability of the government to spend tons of money without killing innocents en masse or making the world hate us - rich politicians got to funnel money to their defense corp buddies AND the average American had something they were proud of, it was win-win!

  59. It's the Definition of "Rock-N-Roll"!!! by Gigantic1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I never saw the Saturn Launch (THE BIG KAHUNA), but I did see a night launch of the Shuttle once from a friend's yard that was 15 miles away from the Launch Gantry.

    I could not see the Gantry, so I had to wait 'till it came over the trees. It was a moonless night. The moment it was ignited, and minutes before I saw it, the sky turned an acetylene-yellow and night became as day. Had I been driving on Interstate 95 there is no doubt I could have turned of my lights and drivrn in complete safety at 70+ MPH: it was THAT bright. About 30 seconds later, the groundwave hit and set of every car alarm in the neighborhood, made every garage door rattle and got every dog withing miles howlin' thier arses off. About a minute or so afterwards, the rumble of the motors was heard.

    An additional minute passed before it came over the trees and headed North.

    What a beast of a machine. I bet the Saturn was at least twice as impressive.

    Rock-N-Roll!!!

    Yeah...I think this beast is worth saving.

  60. What about the one in Huntsville? by PlatinumCursor · · Score: 1

    I live in Huntsville, which has two Saturn V's, one actual rocket laying on its side in Rocket Park, and another model standing in full, 360 foot glory, by the interstate. Nothing is more riveting than driving down the interstate at night and being able to see this shimmering white spectacle from miles away. It's a true testament to American ingenuity and brilliance. There are alot of things that are restored with practically no signifigance. This is something that can inspire America once again. The 1960s, between the Apollo program, and the Interstate Highway System, were the last giant American engineering marvels. We need something new to amaze our children and continue our engineering superiority.

    --
    PlatinumCursor - "Blinded by the bling..."
  61. The Title by new+account+for+mod · · Score: 1

    Moon Rocket, Scrubbed and Blown Dry

    It just sounds kinda dirty, like a review for astronaut porn or something....

  62. Not a Great Headline by windowpain · · Score: 1

    "Moon Rocket Scrubbed and Blown Dry" is not a good choice of words. When a launch is postponed it's said to be "scrubbed." And "blown dry" does not evoke the right image because of "scrubbed." If you want to have fun with a headline make it internally consistent so readers will get the joke. A better choice would have been "Moon Rocket Gets a Wash and Blow Dry."

    --
    Insert witty sig here.
    1. Re:Not a Great Headline by nick0909 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, not to bash on the guy, but when I read scrubbed I was trying to figure out which moon rocket was up for launch. The blown dry part just made no sense at all and was disregarded. Granted, reading another 10 seconds cleared it up, but misleading headline none-the-less.

    2. Re:Not a Great Headline by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1
      And "blown dry" does not evoke the right image because of "scrubbed."

      It could evoke the image of a cancelled launch and emptied and dried fuel tanks...

  63. Re:No way that $4M could be better spent.../sarcas by danratherfan · · Score: 1

    It is a shame they're going to spend 4 million on one of the few remaigning relics of the zenith of America's space age. Perhaps you would also be concerned about the 400 billion a year corporate welfare state we created for the defense industry, but the difference is a mere 10^5.

  64. If you care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.saturnrestoration.org/

  65. Someone has to say it... by slurpburp · · Score: 3, Funny

    I am also in possesion of a rocket which has been neglected for far too long. Where do I sign up to have it 'scrubed and blown'?

    1. Re:Someone has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope for your sake that there isn't "a lot of biology growing on there"...

  66. Quick! by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Someone submit this thing for X Prize!

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  67. Re:Another waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Communism failed, buddy. Haven't you heard? It turns out everybody wants to be a poet and nobody wants to be a janitor.

  68. There's another in Huntsville, Alabama by wheatwilliams · · Score: 1

    There is another rusting Saturn V in even worse shape at the NASA museum and space camp in Huntsville, Alabama. I believe they're soliciting donations to restore that one as well.

  69. After reading just the title... by WoTG · · Score: 1

    I thought they were going to clean it up and prep it for launch! Now that would have been worth reading about... =)

  70. Blow Drying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yea, I need someone to blow me dry too... damn, it's been a while.

  71. Re:Another waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people with no marketable skills

    All individuals have marketable skills. How marketable is completely up to themselves.

    government needs to be able to support people who want to be artists, writers, musicians, hobbyists, explorers, naturalists, scientists, inventors, or any other interest

    Right now you really need to focus on supporting yourself. Don't worry about these people; they are very capable of supporting themselves through the fruits of their own intelligence and free will...

    the 'war on terror'...left us only with degraded individual freedoms, dead men and women from mostly lower-income families and more millions into the bank accounts of the businessmen who engineered the whole thing. Thank you, Cheney.
    Ah, didn't see that one coming. Pffft. You can decide on your own if you're satisfied with the way your congressional representatives spend your tax dollars. Vote. If you had written a letter to your senator instead of this vague posting to a discussion about retired Moon rockets you'd be half way to liberal righteousness by now.
  72. Rocket Scrubbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd like Jennifer Lopez to give my rocket a blow dry.

  73. Re:Another waste of money by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

    What utter insanity! Allow me to break this down for you from two points of view.

    From society's point of view, it's a bad idea to reward people for wasteful, unproductive behavior. By this, I mean behavior that doesn't meet (directly or indirectly) a country's basic needs like feeding people, helping people stay alive, keeping out invaders, etc. Poetry is nice and all, but it's just a pastime. Rewards (no matter how small) should go to those that earn them by doing the difficult, dangerous, unpleasant things that just need doing.

    From my point of view, you can piss right off. How dare you suggest that society take some of my money and give it to some lazy bastard!

  74. Let it rot by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    What about documenting its decay?

    Let is lay, rusting in that field. Lets spend our interest on documenting its decay.

    Watch our fleeting focus on expanse slip away, get ruined by moss and tears.

    Whats the hurry? Think this is all we have to achieve?

    Take pictures of the dustpile. Our great-great-great-great...great grandchildren will find our travels -- and our sense of accomplishment -- amusing.

    History is a long time.

  75. Re:Another waste of money by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

    Okay, I just have to post again after re-reading your post.

    And if our society is going to support the idea that we can keep producing more people despite the fact that there are less resources available for them, we need to find a way to keep everyone happy and feeling productive, without overburdening the government or creating a negative social status (welfare).

    Poppycock. I could give a damn if someone feels bad because he recognizes the fact that he's useless. And the problem with welfare isn't that applies a "negative social status" (as well it should!) but that it rewards people for producing children when obviously there were insufficient resources for the parents. (You pointed out both this population/resource issue and the welfare cause in the very same sentence, yet failed to connect them... strange.)

    Put simply, the government needs to be able to support people who want to be artists, writers, musicians, hobbyists, explorers, naturalists, scientists, inventors, or any other interest that involves individual dedication and creativity.

    Artists, writers, musicians, and maybe hobbyists (Hobbyists? WTF? Who isn't a hobbyist?) might benefit those around them in some metaphysical sense, but not in any practical one. They certainly don't deserve public subsidies. Are you aware that artists can sell their works? If the artist can make a living that way, then he will, and capitalism worked. If he can't, he'll find a job that pays, and capitalism worked. In no case is it necessary to resort to communism.

    Until recently, Oxford, Cambridge and other universities in the UK were completely free for citizens to attend.

    Hundreds of thousands? Wow. Look, you don't have to go to Oxford. There are many great universities (at least in the US) in the low tens of thousands, start to finish. Many even lower, depending on what you're planning to do when you get out. A small price to pay. The years you invest gaining the education are worth more. As uses of public money go, however, I would have to say that subsidized education is certainly not the worst.

    With your last point, that interplanetary boondoggles are still more worthwhile than wars on terror, I must wholeheartedly agree.

  76. May have happened by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All the launched Saturn V first and second stages are somewhere on the ocean floor. I doubt if they're at reef depth, though.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  77. Re:Another waste of money by fingusernames · · Score: 1

    Precisely. People with viewpoints like that often refer to "The Government" and seem to believe that "Government" money is mana from heaven. Taxation is involuntary servitude. It is confiscating the fruit of the labor of your fellow man. It is something to be minimized, not maximized. It is a necessary evil, with the emphasis on EVIL. To tell a person that they must, on pain of *death* (which is the ultimate power of the state, to kill you for resisting it), fork over their money so that a poet can sit at home and write poetry, is just morally wrong. Paying the poet voluntarily, that's a good thing. More power to you. Enslaving a fellow human to provide for your needs is wrong. Keep that in mind when you speak of the "right" to healthcare, or food, or whatever. Does your supposed "right" *require* the labor or money of another human? Think about it.

    People doing things from the goodness of their hearts is a beautiful thing. People doing things at the behest of the barrel of a gun, where the alternative is prison or death, is a pure evil.

    Larry

  78. Double Entendre? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Moon Rocket Scrubbed and Blown Dry"

  79. Re:Finally something nasa engineers can do by DrMrLordX · · Score: 1

    That Saturn V is just screaming for a giant latex-colored tarp to be draped over it, emblazoned with the Trojan logo.

    Bigger is better, after all . . .

  80. Before step 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Learn to spell.

  81. Hahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First time I have laughed at Slashdot in a while.

  82. Re:Another waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you're on the MOON!

    In soviet russia moon visit us.

  83. Were they faulty? by zmollusc · · Score: 0

    How come these rockets didn't fly? The development cost was gazillions, the huge manufacturing costs were paid for, was it really just to save a few (million?) bucks that they didn't launch the last appollos? What did the government p!ss away the money they 'saved' on?

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:Were they faulty? by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      What did the government p!ss away the money they 'saved' on?

      Spending money on sending people to the moon and bringing them back alive was considered a waste, so instead they spent it on sending people to Vietnam and, er...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  84. I hit this with a model rocket once by dj_virto · · Score: 1

    True story- We used to have a rocket building club among some high school friends of mine, and would semi-regularly launch in the huge, mowed fields next to the JSC Saturn V.

    As we were not a proper rocket club, but a bunch of unsupervised geek-childs, the emphasis was on the crazy, unpredicatble, ovepowered, underfinned, prone to explode, etc, etc.

    It so happened I built a series of rocket engine powered planes, most of which just spun around. However one made a very dramatic flaming high speed 500 foot long horizontal flight that ended in a head on collision with second stage of the Saturn V. :)

    There was no visible damage to the space-capable behemoth, but my cardboard aeronautical absurdity crumpled and shattered from the blow!

    It's too bad, what with the overboard paranoia and touristy admission charging space center they built, you can't even get out there anymore, much less have fire missiles of your own.

    disclaimer- I did not aim my plane at the Saturn V, it homed in on its own!

  85. What if by FraggedSquid · · Score: 1

    The label says dry-clean only?

    --
    You don't need a lab to make mud.
  86. Video by oojah · · Score: 1

    This will probably get lost amongst the noise, but does anyone have a link to a downloadable video of a Saturn V launch?

    Cheers,

    Roger

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
    1. Re:Video by bujoojoo · · Score: 1

      Here is the Apollo 15 launch in Real Video and MPEG

      Enjoy!

      --
      This space for rent
  87. I blame Apollo for making me a geek by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

    One of my earliest memories (I was 3 at the time) is of the Apollo 11 landing on the Moon. The very sight of these things, never mind the strains of Also sprach Zarathustra, gives me goose pimples and reminds me of the glory days of the 1970s.

  88. Is it ready to go? by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    I'm curious...did they remove anything from the rocket when they set it on its side, like remove equipment from the capsule, etc? Was it ready to fly in that it could have been fueled up and fired, or was it just put together for display purposes?

  89. Preservation is the only right choice by nothingtodo · · Score: 1

    It's history, and the only answer is to restore and preserve it. Two years ago, I went down to Florida to see the rockets and launchpads. To see that Saturn V in the building was simply amazing and those huge F1 engines with pumps capable of thousands of gallons a minute capacity. And, a computer control system that had about as much power as a pocket calculator. The giant crawler thing, the VAB, all those things are so gigantic and impressive to see. They essentially created a bomb with fins on it and flew people on top. Simply amazing.

    --
    -- After all is said and done, more is said than done.
  90. Re:Another waste of money by ab762 · · Score: 1
    Until recently, Oxford, Cambridge and other universities in the UK were completely free for citizens to attend.
    This was not true in the 1960's, when I lived in the UK and my sister was attending University. I don't believe it was ever free.
  91. Re:Another waste of money by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

    Until recently, Oxford, Cambridge and other universities in the UK were completely free for citizens to attend.
    This was not true in the 1960's, when I lived in the UK and my sister was attending University. I don't believe it was ever free.


    First up were you a UK citizen?

    Universities in the UK have never, to my knowledge, been free for foreign students.

    A long long time ago (maybe the 1960's, I'm not sure) I believe that some (maybe even all) UK universities charged their students. However during the 1970s-1990s universities in the UK were free to UK citizens. Indeed for much of that time students could also get a student grant from the government to help assist them through university.

    Things were starting to change when I attended uni in 1990. The grant had been reduced quite heavily and was in the process of being replaced with student loans (low interest government loans to students). Grants disappeared totally about 12 years ago. There was even a while when students could claim unemployment benefit as well as their grant.

    These days all but the very poorest students in the UK must pay annual tuition fees which is currently standardised for all universities. Hardly anybody qualifies for free tuition now. The universities though are still subsidised. This is likely to change again in the not too distant future with more presigious universities such as Oxford or Cambridge charging higher fees.

  92. WARNING COPYRIGHT ALERT!!!!! by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Uh oh!! Sapagettioo!!!

    Look what I found at the bottom of the page!!!

    Sssshhhh!!
    Everybody take note!!!
    DON'T post extracts or...[NO CARRIER]

    [lawsuit type="dmca" excuse="copyright-theft"]
    FBI!!!
    GOT YOU HIPPIES!!!
    At last! First we shut down Slashdot!Then the net!!

    And there's nothing you can do about it lawbreakers!!!
    AHA!AHAHA!! AHAAHAAHAAA!!!
    [/lawsuit?]

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  93. Re:Another waste of money by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

    You make a good point here. Of course virtually all the comments you've received so far have been disagreeing with you. What good capitalists the Slashdot crowd are. :-)

    Of course, as I'm sure you're aware, one big flaw with what you put forward is that the concept of "public domain" has been virtually completely destroyed. These days just about everything is owned by a corporation somewhere. Even things that are ostensibly developed as government projects for the people are actually owned by corporations.

    It is also true that as some have pointed out what you are proposing is basically communism. In an ideal world what you propose would be possible, but as you know we don't live in an ideal world. We live in a world full of selfish SOBs who don't give a damn about anyone apart from themselves. They're more worried about lining their own pockets than ensuring their neighbours are not starving to death - our governments are full of people just like this. We're essentially trained to think this way throughout our whole lives starting from a very young age. Unfortunately that's modern capitalism for you, and changing that mindset is very difficult indeed.

  94. Re:Another waste of money by Elentar · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that too, about the number of avowed capitalists who post regularly on Slashdot...

    It's true that my post had many flaws, and I've enjoyed reading the responses, even the ones that made fun of me. ;-) Yours was the best so far because it brings up a couple of direct points - one being that the public domain is no longer a domain but more of a dusty corner, and the other being that communism (and to an extent, socialism) doesn't work. Whatever a government does to provide for citizens who cannot support themselves, it must not be more attractive than actually working for a wage. This is where better minds than mine are needed - I think that all of society would benefit if anyone had the option to live 'for free' on the government and produce something intangible, but only as long as there was some reason for _everyone_ not to do that.

    In other words, I'd like to see the government hire artists of all types for the purpose of entertaining us all. A platinum-selling musician doesn't actually make all that much money ($40-50k/year is excellent from what I understand), so it seems feasible to me. Simply giving the NEA more money would accomplish this.

    I have no idea how to solve the greed problem, though. I just wish the idea of 'reasonable compensation' applied to every form of payment - nobody needs to make $4 million a year to play a sport. And when a musician has made more than a reasonable amount from something they've created, it should enter the public domain where everyone can benefit.

    Yeah, yeah, I know, to most of you I'm just a commie bum and only want to steal everyone's hard-earned wealth. But there must be _something_ better than what we've got now.

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  95. Re:Another waste of money by Elentar · · Score: 1

    I agree with a lot of what you and the parent poster (bluesnowmonkey) said - we certainly shouldn't have a society that makes being unemployed more attractive than working for a living. And taxation is definitely bad! I don't see it going away any time soon, though, so I'm suggesting better ways to spend the money.

    The National Endowment for the Arts is a good example of what I'd like to see - taxpayer money going to produce works of art that are in the public domain and anyone can enjoy. Music, poetry, murals, sculpture, etc and all of it available for free (or at the cost of the media) as a direct return on your tax dollars. The NEA is much smaller, and generally just produces art that gets put into museums or public buildings, but it's a start.

    Nasa is another good example - your tax dollars could be used to pay scientists to research things that improve all our lives. It doesn't have to be a trip to the moon, either - if a government-funded horticulturalist developed a black rose, you could go buy one and plant it for only the cost of other 'public domain' roses. That would benefit everyone, although certainly some individuals could care less about it.

    Allow me to put forth another idea related to taxation - if you work for the government providing your skills to those in need, you are free from having to pay taxes on your income. That income, of course, is also limited - but you have made your finances simpler, you still make enough to live, and you're working for the betterment of our entire society. Is that type of employment for everyone? No, certianly not - likewise not every doctor is willing to volunteer at a Red Cross facility or a homeless shelter. But for those who do wish to do so, there should be some kind of benefit. I have seen far too many professionals who spend much of their extra time and money helping others and still face the same tax burden as others.

    Our way of life, being profit and wealth driven, is rooted in the laws our government enforces. Change must begin there if we are to reward ethical behavior and a social conscience - until it becomes at least as rewarding to help others as to help yourself, we will not live in a society where "paying the poet voluntarily" happens.

    So, to answer your post, I would like to see the money that is being taken from me at implied gunpoint put to a use I approve of, one that benefits society as a whole. Not putting pot-smokers in prison, paying private contractors to rape prisoners in other countries, creating a security force to harass and delay travellers while providing no actual protection, giving away telephone and electric infrastructures to private companies and investing in technology for poor schools that is left to rot in a warehouse somewhere. I'd rather be enslaved to a poet than enslaved to _THAT_.

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
  96. The Saturn V on DVD and other resources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spacecraft Films (www.spacecraftfilms.com) has "The Mighty Saturns" multi-disc DVD sets available, and these are very very cool.

    All the footage has been captured direct from the National Archives, and much of it has never been seen by the public before. The 'Mission Reports' series shows quarterly Saturn development reports made to Congress, giving you a true feel for the national scope of the project.

    The company also produces excellent DVD sets on each of the Apollo missions, with _every frame_ of video and film shot on the mission, from rocket rollout to splashdown, UN-EDITED. These are the 'complete downlink' editions. Talk about geek pr0n!

    You doubters can study the lunar EVA footage and see if you can spot the fakery - but if you watch how the lunar dust comes off the boots and the rover wheels, IMHO there is no way that could be done on Earth...

    Also excellent is the book 'Stages to Saturn - a technological history of the Apollo/Saturn Launch Vehicles' by Roger E. Bilstein. It's NASA publication SP-4206, has photos and drawings, and is available from the US Gubmint Printing Office, which I believe is www.uspto.gov. More detail than you ever wanted to know...

    Have fun kids!

  97. Heh, euphemism! by ixos · · Score: 1

    This sure gives a new spin to 'rubbin the rocket'!

  98. Re:Another waste of money by bluesnowmonkey · · Score: 1

    Poets have been selling their works for a long time. Granted, not many have gotten wealthy off of their passion, but maybe that's because it's not worth a whole lot. I suspect that a lot of people are like me and appreciate art, but have slightly less need and desire for it than, say, a good sandwich. So it kind of sucks that you and others have decided that I need to help support the NEA. Because, you know, I'd really rather fund new brake pads for my car than the creation of a picture of the christ in a jar of piss, or whatever else is coming out of the NEA nowadays.

    Just to be totally clear, none of the above contained any sarcasm whatsoever.

  99. How do the Russians count? by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

    One of my earliest memories is live TV coverage of Apollo-Soyuz. My young brain was very puzzled because I didn't know what number "Soyuz" was.

  100. Re:Another waste of money by Archibald+Buttle · · Score: 1

    From society's point of view, it's a bad idea to reward people for wasteful, unproductive behavior. By this, I mean behavior that doesn't meet (directly or indirectly) a country's basic needs like feeding people, helping people stay alive, keeping out invaders, etc.

    Dude, I was going to write a whole load here about unproductive behaviour that seems to be accepted in modern society which is damaging to society. The habit in America for suing every man and his dog when something goes wrong is a good example of this, and plenty of people are employed and rewarded for this. I would say that this is most definitely against the interests of society.

    I can't really say how to fix this though.

    Unfortunately also many things go on in the name of making our countries safer places these days which actually do the opposite, but the majority of people are too stupid to see that's actually the case. Anything problem that isn't clearly black or white, yes or no, and can't be solved in 15 seconds tends to either get ignored or folks tend to accept a yes/no answer from people in power. The world is of course far more subtle complex than this.

    The solution to this one is better education for all, which means not people knowing more facts, but people better able to think for themselves. Unfortuantely that's against the interests of government and big corporations so that's unlikely to happen any time soon.

    From my point of view, you can piss right off. How dare you suggest that society take some of my money and give it to some lazy bastard! :-)

    Yes, but we're essentially talking about utopian ideals here, and the changes necessary to bring them about are not going to happen without some kind of big revolution. In other words chill dude, the status quo will be around for quite some time.

    Besides that, how do you know that it's going to be lazy bastards receiving money? This mythical money could be going to fund research that could save your life.

    Also I would argue that this doesn't even need a great deal of money anyway. If you ensure that everybody is fed, has a home, medical treatment, and clothing then the job's essentially done. Not that expensive at all really. The USA could easily afford to make sure all of its people had those basic needs - it would take a tiny fraction of the current military budget.

  101. Re:Another waste of money by The+Conductor · · Score: 1

    ...forcing people into massive debt... That basically sums up about 80% of my graduating class at Harvard.

    Um, no one is forcing them to go to Harvard. There are cheaper places to go. In fact, the only reasons to go to a top echelon school is either (a) Big bux after graduation or (b) The marquee value for the very rich who can afford it.

    If love of knowlege, or improving humanity, is your reason for higher education, you really should be looking elsewhere.

  102. PARENT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although, I do want to be a janitor.

  103. Re:Great pick-up line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That line always works for me. You must be ugly or poor or something.

  104. Re:Another waste of money by BlightThePower · · Score: 1

    No it was free, unless you weren't British citizens. Indeed in the 1960s this included a generous maintenance grant! So not only was it free (you needn't pay to attend) it was salaried to an extent as well. My uncle was a student at this time and able to not only attend university, rent digs and socialise, he had enough money to run a small sports car. These days there are little or no grants available and you have to pay, I think, about 3k a year (set to rise in all probability).

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  105. Visited by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    As a child my parents often took me there to see the exhibits. I am glad to see that they are taking long needed steps to preserve this icon from the "space race" for future generations.

    At JSC it has lain outside the front entrance from sometime, and as a child I remember bieng awestruck at the sheer size fo the bohemoth. The thruster cones are as tall as a house. It is about time they did something to preserve this treasure.
    *NOTE* Now maybe they will do something about the Seawolf class Sub and Destroyer at Seawolf State Park.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!