Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Phishing Tools

mikeage writes "PCWorld has an article about an anti-phishing tool available that tries to detect fake websites." This is about Web Caller-ID already in use by eBay's custom user toolbar. The article also talks a bit about the incredible increase in phishing scams.

233 comments

  1. Huh by Lord+Grey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Unless I missed something, neither the article nor the summary provides a link to the product. Here is what I found: Web Caller-ID. That link contains this paragraph:
    Web Caller-ID's detection engine includes hundreds of routines that examine the elements of a web site, ranging from the site's content and links to its page history, and then determine if they are indicative of a spoof. For example, the URL of a particular site might be analyzed for phishing characteristics, such as the inclusion of an IP address at the beginning of the URL, or the source code might be analyzed for calls to a different web site. In production environments, Web Caller-ID consistently detects more than 98% of previously unknown spoof sites using behavioral technology.
    This product sounds interesting at first blush, but don't most phishing scams begin with an email? Web sites that support phishing aren't going to have as many of these charactistics as the email that lured the victims there to begin with. I have to wonder just how well this really works, despite the, "consistently detects more than 98% of previously unknown spoof sites" quote.
    --
    // Beyond Here Lie Dragons
    1. Re:Huh by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      I thought this at first as well... but considering that those phishing emails usually end up sending you to a website, I think it might help.

      I'm skeptical about the 98% thing as well.

    2. Re:Huh by beh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There is, of course, another issue as well - if you eliminate 98% of the phish scams - that'll probably also mean that people will start paying less attention to the problem at hand and might hence become less careful about those phish scams that DO make it into their inbox.

      This might be in a way comparable to the rates of HIV/AIDS spread during the late 80s/early 90s when there was LOTS of media attention to the issue, and people would actually think about what they were doing. Now, a couple of years after the height of media attention to it, the problems are rising again (simply because people no longer think about the issue).

      In the same way, I would guess people might fall more easily for phish scams, once the become more rare again.

    3. Re:Huh by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually there have been a large number of cases where an ISP's DNS server has been poisoned so users type in the legimate www.somehugebank.com and it brings them to a proxy mirror image of the site where you gleefully login in and they scarf your information.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    4. Re:Huh by garcia · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      (simply because people no longer think about the issue).

      Or simply because instead of teaching proper sex protection methods we are teaching the public to just not have sex until they have a religous union under God.

    5. Re:Huh by operagost · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What you have just said has absolutely no basis in fact. They have been teaching the use of contraception in American schools for at least 20 years now. Not having sex at all is always mentioned as obviously being the only 100% effective method, but what part of that is NOT true? Are we all too pessimistic to think that any human being anywhere has self control or the capacity to think for himself?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Huh by Glog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which moon do you live on? Think about spam for a second - it's been around for years and it almost doubles every year. It's become like the most-reviled thing on the internet. And there are STILL people who buy things through spammed ads.

      I don't believe the general populace will get the danger of phishing even if you aired 2 minute warnings every hour on the hour for a month during prime time TV.

      There's always going to be some sucker who falls for a phishing scam. They've become too sophisticated for the average user to detect anyway.

    7. Re:Huh by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      i'm surprised i havent heard of a worm that modifies the host file on the machine in a similar manner.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    8. Re:Huh by sglane81 · · Score: 1

      Lots of viruses and worms modify the hosts file on Windows (yes there actually is one just like on Unix). They usually point domains/subdomains like symantec.com liveupdate.symantec.com, norton.com, etc to non routeable addresses or somewhere they control. The point of doing that is so when people click "update virus definitions" or whatever, they don't actually get the updates and continue to be suceptible to viruses/worms. You don't hear much about it because you probably don't read into too much detail about the virueses.

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    9. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen a few that actually insert a whole bunch of linebreaks between the valid hosts stuff and the bad stuff so when you open it in notepad and aren't paying close attention, it looks normal.

    10. Re:Huh by beh · · Score: 1

      Take a look back at the beginning of the HIV/AIDS crisis - numbers of infected people were rising faster and faster, despite rising media coverage - until about the point the "educational" aspect of using condoms set in... Once that disappeared from the screens (and hence from everyday presence) that "educational" aspect has been forgotten - which explains the new rise.

      Spam is a measure that has to be attacked on a global legislative scale. I think that spam is actually one of the largest political challenges nowadays, simply because it will require (basically) all governments to agree on an issue without giving in to economic pressures by those who actually make money off it. ...hence - it won't be solved... :-(

      Unless - we can keep the educational aspects alive and hence make spams, phish scams, 419ers, ... more and more cost ineffective.

    11. Re:Huh by jesser · · Score: 1

      How does an ISP's DNS server become poisoned? Is it a weakness in a particular DNS server or in the DNS protocol?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    12. Re:Huh by perlchild · · Score: 1

      A dns server itself does not, but with a mix of ip spoofing and lack of ingress/egress filtering at the isp, a dns cache can be polluted with bad data, that is commonly known as dns cache poisoning, or simply, dns poisoning for short.

  2. Educate by Klar · · Score: 4, Insightful
    However, better user education and stronger security from online retailers, banks, and financial institutions is also needed to protect technically unsophisticated consumers from complex online cons like phishing attacks, Schmidt says.
    I have to say that I agree. These tools are great for newbie computer users. But I really think educating people on how to read a URL and not have to rely on a tool like this. If they don't understand the URL, using a 'caller id' program may not always be affective at preventing scams.

    Also, I would like to see a program that would pre-scan a URL and if it appears to be a fake Paypal or Visa site to put the actual domain, and display a warning to alert newbie users.
    1. Re:Educate by Klar · · Score: 1

      Ignore my last paragraph, and read Lord Grey's post above :$

    2. Re:Educate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've seen some intense scam sites where a graphic covers the address bar, and it looks like you are really at citibank. I was actually taken back for a few seconds. I KNEW I was on a phishing site, but the URL was clearly citibank's (I have accounts there). Played with the address bar, and noticed... hmmm.

      This would fool 98% of semi-experienced users.

    3. Re:Educate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone have a link to a site similar to this?

    4. Re:Educate by psin+psycle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Education will only help so long. What happens when someone writes a worm/virus that replaces the /etc/hosts file with one hacked up to send people to phishing sites instead of banking sites? Not only could the phishing websites capture account data, they could also forward the user on to the correct site so they don't even notice a problem. Who's going to check their /etc/hosts file to make sure this isn't happening!

      --
      Need a website host? Try out http://WebQualityHost.net
    5. Re:Educate by Mouse42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      98%, eh? heh.

      One other problem companies have is changing their website's appearance. For example, CapitalOne recently changed their homepage and I was actually too nervous to log in for a few days.

      Also, a poor quality website can make people suspicious. A friend of mine asked me to inspect his cable company's website to see if it were real or not because it was so poorly designed. I told him since it was so poorly designed to not trust it's security, either, and not bother doing the online bill pay.

    6. Re:Educate by donnyspi · · Score: 3, Informative

      This Citibank one's even more sophisticated than having an image cover the address bar: http://www.antiphishing.org/phishing_archive/07-05 -04_Citibank_(Citisafe_by_Citibank).html

    7. Re:Educate by moeymo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're right. Additionally...

      The type of user that knows enough to install such a tool will be the same user that wouldn't be fooled in the first place.

      Vice versa: a user that doesn't know about phishing and would get fooled is also the user that doesn't understand why such a toolbar would be useful!

    8. Re:Educate by sglane81 · · Score: 1

      CapitalOne recently changed their homepage and I was actually too nervous to log in for a few days.

      If you're too nervous to login, do some verification. I've got some frontends on one of my server that does dns, reverse dns, whois, netblock info, etc that let's me know that if I'm getting the right domain name resolutions on my local machines. There are many services like this, but this one is mine (http://www.scriptsharks.com/tools/host-info.php). SamSpade.org is another good one that has been around a while. Checking the what other nameservers resolve to compared against yours is a good way of verifying the machine you are connecting to is the actual machine the site is on.

      If the root nameservers are compromised, it's another story.
      If the box the actual site is on is compromised, it's another story.
      If your ISP is compromised, it's another story.

      Basically, all you can do is unplug your ethernet or take some chances. Welcome to the internet. Have a nice day. (this is in no way an attack on the parent)

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
  3. Glasses by jobeus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Glasses would be a good anti-phishing tool... Seems almost 95% of the sites I come across just replace a . with a - somewhere. If people could see it more clearly......... :D

    1. Re:Glasses by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Glasses would be a good anti-phishing tool... Seems almost 95% of the sites I come across just replace a . with a - somewhere

      A normal-sized brain behind the glasses would work very well too. I mean, for example, the Microsoft-looking emails that require you to give a password, or a CC number or something: who the hell with a normal intelligence would fall for that one?

      Most scams look exactly like that: scams. They're so easy to spot with a vaguely critical eye that it's not funny. The problem is, who will educate a public that doesn't understand much about computers in the first place?

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Glasses by wan-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I agree that helping people understand computers is partly the issue here, there's an even bigger issue and that's educating the public in general to be more aware of scams. Remember, though the internet is a haven for scammers, there are plenty of them out there sending direct mailings or using infomercials. People still fall for those and not just the tricks on the net.

      I think a big part of it is people are simply more lazy these days. As a result, they are more willing to believe in a get-rich quick scheme or an identification check for a bank or sweepstakes or whatever (especially the old who are more trusting). But who knows, maybe it's not that, it could very well be that people are just stupid and gullible by nature (which many /.'ers seem to think given the number of times I've seen references to "sheeple" and the like).

  4. Already sluggish... by La_Boca · · Score: 5, Informative

    Does That Web Site Look Phishy?

    WholeSecurity's new software claims to identify fraudulent sites.

    Paul Roberts, IDG News Service
    Monday, August 16, 2004

    A new software tool from WholeSecurity can spot fraudulent Web sites used in online cons known as "phishing" scams, according to a statement from the company.

    Advertisement

    The new product, called Web Caller-ID, can detect Web pages dressed up to look like legitimate e-commerce sites. WholeSecurity is marketing the technology to banks, credit card companies, and online retailers as a way to prevent unwitting customers from accessing false sites, to reduce fraud, and increase confidence in online commerce, the company says.

    Phishing scams are online crimes that use unsolicited commercial, or "spam," e-mail to direct Internet users to Web sites controlled by thieves, but are designed to look like legitimate e-commerce sites. Users are asked to provide sensitive information such as a password, Social Security number, bank account, or credit card number, often under the guise of updating account information.

    Already in Use

    A version of Web Caller-ID is already being used by EBay in a feature called Account Guard, part of an EBay Web browser toolbar that users of the online auction site can download for free. The feature detects suspicious behavior, such as Web URLs that disguise the true Internet address of the site the user is visiting.

    Companies can license a Web browser plug-in from WholeSecurity, which can then be distributed to customers directly or as part of a Web browser toolbar. Alternatively, companies can sign up for an e-mail processing service from WholeSecurity that harvests information on phishing scams from spam e-mail or customer complaint e-mail sent to the company, WholeSecurity says.

    A Web browser-based management console lets administrators view suspected phisher sites, file complaints against spoof Web sites, or fine-tune the Web Caller-ID technology to adapt to their company's Web site.

    On the Rise

    Reports of phishing attacks have skyrocketed in recent months, according to the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG), a joint industry-law enforcement group.

    There were 1422 new, unique attacks reported to the APWG in June, a 19 percent increase over the previous month. Since the beginning of 2004, reports of the attacks have grown by 52 percent a month on average, the group says.

    A survey of 5000 adult Internet users by research firm Gartner released in April found that the number of phishing attacks spiked in the last year and that around 3 percent of those surveyed reported giving up personal financial or personal information after being drawn into a phishing scam. The results suggest that as many as 30 million adults have experienced a phishing attack and that 1.78 million adults could have fallen victim to the scams, Gartner says.

    Taking the First Step

    Web Caller-ID is not a cure-all for the phishing problem, but is a good first step to provide comprehensive protection from the scams, says Howard Schmidt, former White House cybersecurity advisor and the current chief information security officer at EBay.

    "These are some of the things we need to do moving forward--getting technology built into the Web browsers themselves to do these things," he says.

    However, better user education and stronger security from online retailers, banks, and financial institutions is also needed to protect technically unsophisticated consumers from complex online cons like phishing attacks, Schmidt says.

    "You can't put somebody in a car and tell them to drive, but not tell them what the brake and gas pedal are for," he says.

    1. Re:Already sluggish... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 2, Funny
      Look if you are going to post the text of an article here, at least include the relevant URLs. The ad has been replaced by
      Advertisement
      Now how I'm I supposed to click through to the exciting, not to be missed, opportunity that the advertiser paid for!

      John.

    2. Re:Already sluggish... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry!

      Here you go, just go here http://www.advertysement.com/ and enter your credit card details, we will gladly show you the missing content. ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    3. Re:Already sluggish... by cuzality · · Score: 1
      Sounds like you would really enjoy a brand-new extension for Mozilla Firefox!

      Tired of missing those great opportunities because of those annoying printer-friendly links? Try Ad-Bar from Squarefree!

      Ad-Bar's special features:
      • adbar displays Google ads related to pages you view
      • because the ads are relevant, they are occasionally useful (THAT'S A PROMISE!)
      When adbar isn't displaying ads from Google, it displays
      • Firefox-related things such as silly Firefox slogans
      • ads for other Mozilla software
      • and requests for donations to the Mozilla Foundation
      Plus, Ad-Bar is tri-licensed (MPL, GPL, LGPL)! Mmmmm, taste that FOSS-goodness!
    4. Re:Already sluggish... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Jeez, if you're going to post the text of an article at least have the decency to edit out the advertizement!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  5. Technological solution to a social problem by wheany · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought the general consensus was that technological solutions to a social problems don't work.

    1. Re:Technological solution to a social problem by MindStalker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hu? No, the general consensus was you can't legislate these problems away, ie spam, phishing etc.
      User education is the most important, but technical solutions have to be used. Thats like saying you shouldn't bother with having a virus scanner, because people should all be taught to avoid viruses.

    2. Re:Technological solution to a social problem by sadcox · · Score: 1

      agreed...some people are going to have to learn the hard way not to give out sensitive information about themselves.

      I say let's evolve, and let the chips fall where they may. But that's just me--I could be wrong.

      --
      "He hated Mexicans, and he was half Mexican. AND he hated irony!"
    3. Re:Technological solution to a social problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the general consensus was that technological solutions to a social problems don't work.

      Not so. Many social problems could be solved by technology. For example, a large electrified fence around Harlem, or vitrifying Israel and Palestine with a nuke, would go a long way to improve the lives of many...

    4. Re:Technological solution to a social problem by Yewbert · · Score: 2, Funny
      My anti-Phishing tool-kit:

      Deodorant

      A razor

      A comb

      Air-freshener

      A sign that says, "No camping allowed."

      Oh, wait - that's my anti-Phish-FAN tool-kit.

      (Before ya get your mellow all harshed, I AM a Phish fan, to a degree. ;-) )

    5. Re:Technological solution to a social problem by ooby · · Score: 1

      Heh, I actually don't have a virus scanner, but I do get very worried whenever I'm about to download something that even smells like might execute.

  6. Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by NewbieV · · Score: 4, Informative

    Spoofstick is a plugin for FireFox or Internet Explorer that can help identify 'phishy' sites while surfing.

    It does take a little more real estate out of the browser's window, but it's a pretty useful tool when teaching people about the dangers of clicking links blindly.

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
    1. Re:Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem arises with this when a website has multiple domains to cover their content. That can confuse users. Multiple domains shouldn't be used just to serve media from another server, but I've seen it done. Also, what happens when you are drawing content from other domains? Will Spoofstick list all the domains?

    2. Re:Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, wrong link, here is the correct one.

    3. Re:Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sites like apple use other domains for their images. It looks like apple has recently changed a bit though. Instead of all images coming from akamai directly, they come from images.apple.com.

      But...

      ping images.apple.com
      PING a932.g.akamai.net (38.115.177.150) 56(84) bytes of data.
      64 bytes from 38.115.177.150: icmp_seq=1 ttl=57 time=30.6 ms

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
    4. Re:Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Still, you're relying on the DNS of apple.com being correct. The root domain.
      The problem comes when apple.com loads images from images-apple.com or something that's a separate domain, rather than simply a sub-domain.

    5. Re:Anti-phishing toolbar for FireFox by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 1

      In the past, they were using akamai's domain directly in the images. I had junkbuster filtering out all the images from akamai, and it used to make a big mess of apple's site. I'm not sure when that changed, since I don't got to apple.com very often.

      As you say, having DNS resolve a sub-domain solves the probelm, and I would hope that any site that is really worried about security would be able to set up an extra DNS entry to handle this.

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
  7. You mean... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...I wasn't supposed to give s1ashdot my credit card number to read this story?

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:You mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s1ashdot

      I find it amusing that a vendor's site from which our company places orders (inductors and such) actually redirects you to a similar-looking site, by replacing the "L" with a "1".

      And yes, we've been ordering from them for years now.

      Coilcraft

    2. Re:You mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the honor system. Now that you've read the story, you should post your credit card number. Here's mine

  8. Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The proper solution to phishing scams is
    1) Educate everyone not to give out confidential information to anyone.
    2) Track the phishing sites and publically hang the owner. These things are not difficult to track by the very nature of the scam.

    1. Re:Wrong Solution by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In the US or UK maybe, but many of these sites are located in parts of the world where you can get anonymous internet access.

    2. Re:Wrong Solution by celeritas_2 · · Score: 0

      Anyone even moderatly computer-literate can recognise a phishing scam, but there is no way anyone can educate the army of grandmas on the internet about phishing. The solution is closer to #2, there has to be a way to either kill the sites or put a giant 'fake site' sign on [sigh] MSIE becuase you know that firefox users know better :)

      --
      -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    3. Re:Wrong Solution by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Also important: educate companies who do business on the web to never send out legitimate requests for account updates via email. Most large companies would not do this, but some of the smaller players do not think about how this could cause major confusion and problems for users.

    4. Re:Wrong Solution by Wizzo1138 · · Score: 2

      Can you get a anonymous access with enough bandwidth to run a server? Or maybe they don't expect to have enough hits at any one time to actually care.

      --
      Always go to other people's funerals, otherwise they won't come to yours.
    5. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just get on the site. You enter a credit card number that is being tracked by citibank. You follow the transaction. You find out who is getting the illegal stuff. Then, you arrange a blanket party. Video tape. Distribute.

      Phishing attempts drop 99% in three months.

    6. Re:Wrong Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An addendum to my first two posts: 21st century technology combined with old school justice. Can't beat it with a stick (but you can beat con artists with a stick).

    7. Re:Wrong Solution by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or

      b. Send out a massive phishing e-mail and scold anyone who falls for it.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    8. Re:Wrong Solution by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Well, if they are expert phishers, then they probably have a few spare identities they can use to set up the server. And even if they aren't annonymous, you stll have the problem of the host country actually being able to/wanting to prosecute them. that isn't always a given....

  9. My rule is usually fairly simple by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just don't click on any links via email to anything unless you solicited it (such as an email verification to a mailing list you're subscribing to). When I'm in doubt, all I do is type in the URL to the bank/brokerage/etc. web site myself (fire up browser and type in homepage URL), log in and find out if there is anything going on. Most such websites have a way to look at everything and take any needed action right away after you type in a user/pass.

    *sigh* and on that note there is a sucker born every minute I suppose.

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:My rule is usually fairly simple by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No kidding, Email should go back to being a text only messaging system. Strip out all the html, urls, and binary attachments and watch the world become a better place.

      Then again, I work in the security sector so all these flaws bring home the bacon. It is still frustrating to watch such broken systems dominate the world.

    2. Re:My rule is usually fairly simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does anyone else find this statement funny:

      *sigh* and on that note there is a sucker born every minute I suppose.
      ...in bed.


      Seems like the "...in bed" ending is reasonable. Whereas, it was supposed to be funny. :)

      I am easily amuzed today...

    3. Re:My rule is usually fairly simple by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      LOL, that "...in bed" sig adds a new dimension to some of my posts, I get a lot more "funny" mods these days.

      --
      ...in bed
  10. phishing automated reply by djtech · · Score: 4, Funny

    What we need is a way to automatically reply to these phishing scams with bogus information. I'd like to be able to order everything sent in a spam message too with bogus information. Beat them at their own game!

    1. Re:phishing automated reply by introverted · · Score: 2, Funny
      What we need is a way to automatically reply to these phishing scams with bogus information.

      The next time a banking official from Nigeria requests your assistance in getting some money out of the country, explain that you need to verify that he's "on the up and up" and ask him for whatever information the phishing site wants....

    2. Re:phishing automated reply by bmwm3nut · · Score: 1

      i would like to have a central list that we can send the links to phishing websites. then someone smarter than me could write a script that just goes through the sites and enters bogus info (that looks real). if we reduce their signal to noise, it'll become much less profitable for them.

    3. Re:phishing automated reply by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's for mortgage spammers and not phishers, but I'm a fan of the Unsolicited Commando project. It's a little Java app that spends its day filling out mortgage applications on spamvertised sites with completely believable - but totally bogus - personal data. The source is available so perhaps a clever person could randomly generate credit card numbers and adapt the program to attack phish sites.

    4. Re:phishing automated reply by Electrum · · Score: 1

      I'd like to be able to order everything sent in a spam message too with bogus information.

      That's called fraud and is illegal.

    5. Re:phishing automated reply by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      it's not fraud if you do not get anything and do not intend to get anything, fraud is when you lie to obtain something, not when you lie to trick some fucker to an address which does not exist.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    6. Re:phishing automated reply by Electrum · · Score: 1

      it's not fraud if you do not get anything and do not intend to get anything

      The OP said "order", which implies making a purchase. Fraud is "intentional deception", not "intending to get something".

  11. Will this reach the intended users? by broothal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People who are likely to fall for the usual phishing techniques are, unfortunately, not likely to install any tools to prevent phising. Odds are, that they never knew it existed before they fell for it.

  12. Anti-Phishing Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Visine?

    1. Re:Anti-Phishing Tool by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 1

      For real. I spent 24 hours on I-91 only to get told to go home. :(

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    2. Re:Anti-Phishing Tool by Huring · · Score: 0

      Cyanide?

      --
      There is never, ever, any need for MS Comic Sans
  13. phishers of men by celeritas_2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've tried to actually reply to some of the money-caught-in-forign-bank phish attempts and the only thing i get back is more and more phishing. I've failed to reach the point where they ask for your SSN credit card or my first born child. Either they're stupid and don't want my information, or they're smart and realize i know what they're up to.

    --
    -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    1. Re:phishers of men by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tried to actually reply to some of the money-caught-in-forign-bank phish attempts and the only thing i get back is more and more phishing.

      Nigerian scams are not the same thing as phishing. The only one that comes close is the 419 scammer that claims he's with Barclays, but he's not even close to convincing, and he's not pretending that they have business with your account there, only a (fictional) account he "discovered" at the bank.

    2. Re:phishers of men by berkowow · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is a major misconception that the Nigerian e-mail scammers are after your bank account information. What they are actually running is an "advance-fee fraud." After you give them your account info and all the rest of that stuff, they will tell you that they were just about the send you the money, but that the bank needs you to pay a $500 fee to get the money out of escrow. If you wire them the $500 over Western Union, they'll come up with something else which needs to be done, e.g. a sick relative, a bribe to a state official, etc. They'll string you along with these advance fees for as long as possible. In some cases, they'll try to get you to go down to Nigeria yourself where you'll be kidnapped and held for ransom. The whole scam is remarkably low-tech, and not at all what most people expect.

    3. Re:phishers of men by celeritas_2 · · Score: 0

      It would make an interesting weekend going to Nigeria and beating up some scammers :) just remember to bring with you a few friends of the bouncer or kung fu variety.

      --
      -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    4. Re:phishers of men by Sarastrobert · · Score: 2, Informative

      It might be worth mentioning (not that I think you are serious or anything) that people have gone down to Nigeria to get their money back, and have been murdered by the scammers.

      I wouldn't go there even with 10 bouncer friends, but then again, I wouldn't fall for a Nigeria letter either.

    5. Re:phishers of men by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      how about send an "advance fee" paid in full with antrhax, though i suppose you'd be labeled a terrorist for doing it, or a letter bomb with razors.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  14. Email Phishing by TheOtherAgentM · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From what you and I probably see, yes. Phishing begins with an email, because we probably don't browse shady sites regularly. I don't know what the average user sees in their regular browsing. I can't even figure out where people get all the spyware from in the first place. As far as phishing emails, I know I get one email regularly that looks like a CitiBank email, but it is a .jpg file embedded. The URL has citi in it, but if you look closer, it's obviously not the right sight. I'd report it, but Citi Bank's online reporting sucks.

    1. Re:Email Phishing by Theatetus · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got it too, though thunderbird marked it as spam and my anti-phishing tool in firefox told me "you are at 31337.h4x0rz.cn" or wherever. I'm not sure what good it would do to report it to citi since there's nothing they can do about it except maybe send out emails to everyone in the world telling them not to believe emails claiming to be from them.

      --
      All's true that is mistrusted
    2. Re:Email Phishing by james_marsh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm not sure what good it would do to report it to citi since there's nothing they can do about it except maybe send out emails to everyone in the world telling them not to believe emails claiming to be from them.
      There's just a slight flaw in that logic...

    3. Re:Email Phishing by realdpk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, as someone who's working at a web host, I can tell you Citibank does take this sort of thing seriously, and they are interested to know where the sites are being hosted.

      Who knows what they do with that information. Maybe nothing. Still, it's worth reporting, if only to show that the community is against these frauds.

    4. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > There's just a slight flaw in that logic...

      No there isn't.

      You receive an email supposedly from Citibank, telling you not to trust emails from Citibank.

      If it's a fake email, it means you can't trust emails claiming to be from Citibank anymore, because someone's faking them.

      If it's legit, it's telling you not to trust emails from Citibank, so you'd better not.

      So, for this particular message, it doesn't matter whether it's fake or for real - you still know not to trust any more emails.

      So how do the real Citibank communicate with you? By waiting till you next log into your internet bankning account (for minor stuff), or sending you a physical letter, or phoning you (for important stuff - which shouldn't be going by email anyway).

    5. Re:Email Phishing by aussersterne · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Citibank can't do anything about it anyway; they're not law enforcement, and even if they were, what exactly do you see law enforcement doing about SPAM or phish emails? Nada.

      I used to work at eBay and the phishing problem was terrible (though I didn't deal with it directly, that wasn't my department). When users would find out, they'd demand to know why eBay didn't do something about it. The people who worked on that floor would stand around in the smoking shed and bitch, "What do they want us to do, buy some guns and go to Romania and raid the guy's house wearing little eBay uniforms?"

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    6. Re:Email Phishing by Andrewkov · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I reported one of these scams to Citibank through their website (I'm not even a customer, just a nice guy). They didn't even ackknowledge my report, let alone fix it.

    7. Re:Email Phishing by the+unbeliever · · Score: 1

      It would be fucking awesome if they did, in a very frightening way.

      It leads me to think of the dystopia that is Shadowrun's game world, where corporations have their own standing armies.

    8. Re:Email Phishing by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They can't do much about it upfront. However, as soon as it involves withdrawals from customer's accounts it moves over into fraud ... which they can do something about (via usual legal means). Neither Citibank, nor any of the others (I've seen BofA, Wells Fargo, and others) are going to acknowledge all the emails they get reporting these scams. Instead, the data is accumulated and those that report they lost money this way will be prioritized because these can be used for prosecution.

      Personally, I'm waiting for the point where we can have a Darwin's Award for the idiots who answer those emails ... y'know the point when one of them loses every last dime in a scam and commits suicide, dies from a badly produced batch of V@l1um or V1agr@, or tries to gain or lose inches and has an accident with the means thereto. When this garbage produces 0 results, no matter how many millions are sent out, it will self-destruct.

      --
      I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    9. Re:Email Phishing by Volmarias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know? That would be absolutely delightful. Hell, I'm sure there would be legions of geeks willing to ensure that the information entered into their systems wasn't "Murder", but "Tickling with fluffy bunnies" instead.

      I've always wondered just what law enforcement would do if someone started to serially hunt spammers, and I keep coming to the conclusion that all you need to keep the trail cold is leave a note saying "This man sent your daughter emails about zoo porn"

    10. Re:Email Phishing by Traa · · Score: 1

      I got several of those. The first one was an eye opener to the world of phishing for me. I did actually report it to Citi Bank through their online reporting mechanism. I'm hoping they are working with law enforcement to go after the purpetrators....ok, just kidding. At least I'm hoping that if enough people complain they might just have to come up with something that helps their real customers. I dunno, send out an 'awareness email', I know that my parents don't have a clue when it comes to phishing, they still think they are safe because they installed a virus checker.

    11. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "What do they want us to do, buy some guns and go to Romania and raid the guy's house wearing little eBay uniforms?"

      How about persuading the government to put pressure on the foreign country's government until they sort the problem out? If the MPAA can get "DVD Jon" arrested all the way over in Norway, surely eBay can get some spammers arrested?

    12. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instead of Shiawase and Seretech, we'll have the eBay and Citibank decisions.

    13. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll know it's really from Citibank if it's written in italics!

    14. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The people who worked on that floor would stand around in the smoking shed and bitch, "What do they want us to do, buy some guns and go to Romania and raid the guy's house wearing little eBay uniforms?"


      Well, yes, if it's not tooooooo much trouble...

    15. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Like Halliburton's army of private security in Iraq? Just a fancy-pants way of saying mercenaries.

    16. Re:Email Phishing by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "What do they want us to do, buy some guns and go to Romania and raid the guy's house wearing little eBay uniforms?"

      That's not all that far from the real world. Goverment is corporations; corporations is government.

    17. Re:Email Phishing by wmaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My dad recently showed me that e-mail, that exact one, and the link says http://www.citibank.com/blah.aspx but if you were to actually click the link it goes to citibank.ru or something similar.

    18. Re:Email Phishing by SequelGuy · · Score: 1

      I very recently received a CitiBank phishing email. I reported it to abuse at my domain, citibank, abuse at their email domain, and abuse at the domain of the fake CitiBank site. I haven't heard from CitiBank, but I received word from an admin at the ISP for the fake CitiBank site, saying their account was suspended.

      Perhaps the email and website weren't the phisher's to begin with, but I'd like to think I've caused some amount of irritation.

      Its easy to tell its a phishing scheme when a bank with which I don't have an account asks for my account information.

    19. Re:Email Phishing by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It'd be like Boondock Saint's with T-1's.

      "Television is the explanation for this. You see this in bad television. Little assault guys creeping through the vents, coming in through the ceiling - that James Bond shit never happens in real life, professionals don't do that."

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    20. Re:Email Phishing by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      I recently got a phishing email claiming to be from *my* bank (which is not citibank or another large bank). The mouseover URL (in IE/Outlook Express) was to a URL that represented my bank, but the actual URL to which it would have directed was an IP. I actually called the bank (the email looked like a phishing scam other than the URL) before I figured out how they did it. At first, I thought that a corrupt sysadmin was involved (who set up the phishing site in the bank's web space).

      This finally pushed me over to Thunderbird, even though it's not ready for my needs (for the love of Linus, people, make the SMTP server definable per email account, just like the POP server). Thunderbird displays the same URL on mouseover as it will use when one clicks on it (I actually filed a bug report with Microsoft that OE/IE do not).

    21. Re:Email Phishing by flonker · · Score: 1
      I am a Citbank customer, and this is the response they sent me for a recent report.

      To: "??? ???"
      Subject: RE: the e-mail spoof you reported
      From: "emailspoof"
      Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 23:17:27 -0400

      Thank you for reporting this incident.

      If you've replied to a suspicious e-mail, and provided personal or sensitive information about your account - please call 1-800-374-9700 immediately.

      ABOUT THIS MESSAGE
      Please do not reply to this Customer Service e-mail. For account-specific inquiries, kindly call 1-800-374-9700 or visit www.citibankonline.com.
    22. Re:Email Phishing by pnutjam · · Score: 2, Informative

      I saw a similar one, if you look closely they are using frames. The one I had was a 3 frame page, top and bottom frames were the actual website, so it showed that in the address bar, only the middle frame was haxor.ru or some such crap.

    23. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hey man, I trust you'll love Pohl & Kornbluth's old sci-fi classic "Merchants Of Space".

      Corporations have private armies (and strict rules for "business war" which is quite literally just that), US Senators represent corporations instead of geographical and political factions (states and parties), advertising agencies don't just advertise or create products but re-organise entire industries and the consumptions of entire continents...

      And nobody talks about "commies" any more, the "consies" (conservatives) are the enemy of progress and free capitalism ;-)

      And it's just a plain good story regardless of the dizzying visionaryism in it.

    24. Re:Email Phishing by sglane81 · · Score: 1

      ...as soon as it involves withdrawals from customer's accounts it moves over into fraud ... which they can do something about (via usual legal means).

      Not all countries have extradition treaties with your country. It is fraud, but people in other countries don't give a shit if a few random americans get screwed out of a couple thousand dollars. The person who got screwed for being a dumbass won't have any legal recourse.

      --
      This is the Internet. You can say "fuck" here. - AC
    25. Re:Email Phishing by pyros · · Score: 2, Informative
      This finally pushed me over to Thunderbird, even though it's not ready for my needs (for the love of Linus, people, make the SMTP server definable per email account, just like the POP server). Thunderbird displays the same URL on mouseover as it will use when one clicks on it (I actually filed a bug report with Microsoft that OE/IE do not).

      While the interface probably isn't what you're expecting, that is already possible. In the Account Settings dialog, select SMTP in the pane on the left. Then click the Advanced button on the right, and you can add multiple SMTP servers. Then for each account select Server Settings in the left pane, and click the Advanced button on the right. You can specify any of the configured SMTP servers there. You can also select from any of the configured SMTP servers during email composition, the from line should have a pull-down arrow next to it.

    26. Re:Email Phishing by nanojath · · Score: 1

      Oh, I don't know. The perpetrators are involved in electronic fund transfer at some point, meaning at some point a wired bank possesses their money. An outfit like Citibank has long arms and it can swing a lot of influence. They're probably just trying to get a handle on the scope and source of a fraudulent activity carried out in their name right now, but I think they could motivate some enforcement if they could identify a target.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    27. Re:Email Phishing by s4m7 · · Score: 1

      Phishing begins with an email, because we probably don't browse shady sites regularly.

      ...said the Slashdot reader.

      --
      This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    28. Re:Email Phishing by jlechem · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I too used to work for eBay and in that very department and know this smoke shack you speak of. The phishing problem there was terrible but they were getting better. And not only was there phishing but a big problem was assholes that would embed torjan viruses in their auction listings that would install keystroke loggers, etc on peoples machines. But that is another post and whole other thread.

      I know how the toolbar program worked. It worked on scanning the HTML source and based on various factors would tell the user via the toolbar if it thought the site was a spoof site. It wouldn't work in outlook email but I caught a lot of sites that users would see in their web email. If it thought the site was a spoof the user could report it to whole security , visit the site, or just leave. If they reported the site it would get put into a black list. This black list contained a huge list of reported sites. This black list was reviewed by reps on a daily basis. Sites that were spoof/phishing were permanently added to the black list of bad sites. Non spoof sites were added to a white list of good sites.

      As far as prosecuting eBay did work with the FBI and secret service but they can only do things if the host country gives a shit. Since most of this stuff happens in Romania, Russia, India and is being run by pro mafia dudes there's nothing they can do. Just be smart and don't fall for the scam. Never give out personal info via email.

      --
      Hold up, wait a minute, let me put some pimpin in it
    29. Re:Email Phishing by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "You can also select from any of the configured SMTP servers during email composition, the from line should have a pull-down arrow next to it."

      That just selects from the from addresses. It still uses the default SMTP server unless one makes the other changes you describe. I had to install an extension to get the ability to select SMTP servers.

      It's not just the interface that is the issue, but the documentation. I can follow how that interface works (although it is clunky), but I couldn't find anything in the help explaining how to do it. Further, when I went Googling, I found an extension that allowed me to choose the SMTP server on a per message basis (which works but was not what I wanted).

      I ran through the setup you recommended and will see if it works for me.

      Thanks for your help,
      Matt

    30. Re:Email Phishing by qengho · · Score: 1


      I can tell you Citibank does take this sort of thing seriously, and they are interested to know where the sites are being hosted.

      Then why does mail to fraud@citibank bounce? If they actually cared (and had half a brain) they'd enable fraud, abuse, spam, scam, etc. and actually pay attention to people who try to report these things.

      Perhaps you could mention this to them, since you seem to have a relationship...

    31. Re:Email Phishing by jonwil · · Score: 1

      I have seen on my banks website and in my online banking "messages" section warnings about these fraudulant emails.

    32. Re:Email Phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can do something, most of the phish website are illegally using their trademarks and a verbatim copy of their HTML, so the DMCA can be used.

    33. Re:Email Phishing by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

      i read this from the article:

      "...Users are asked to provide sensitive information such as a password, Social Security number, bank account, or credit card number, often under the guise of updating account information..."

      i find a verbal, on the phone, does just as good.

      but there's another issue here; that business doesn't know its own customers. its not a bad thing to politely ask someone your doing business with, "Why?"

  15. I have a fairly good anti-phishing tool by JosKarith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's called a healthy dose of cynicism.
    If somebody I have financial dealings with contacts me out of the blue to check my password/account number/mother's maiden name etc. I contact them back - not using the linkback on that e-mail but using the contact details from the documentation I got when I signed up. And I ask them if it's a scam or not.
    And I don't reply until the bank/whatever has got back to me.

    --
    'Don't worry' said the trees when they saw the axe coming, 'The handle is one of us.'
    1. Re:I have a fairly good anti-phishing tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't just stop there, whenever the gasman, the waterman, the lectric man, the phoneman, even members of your own family, ring on the front door and ask to come in to check something, call their company up.

      On some occasions, a healthy dose of paranoia may be useful.

      Fear Everything.

    2. Re:I have a fairly good anti-phishing tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh? Don't you think that your bank will get tired of answering "no we didn't contact you" "no we didn't contact you"...? Doesn't seem like the perfect solution to me.

  16. Here's my Anti-Phishing tool by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My Anti Phishing tool is my brain. I mean sometimes these phishing e-mails are nto even spoof so that they appear to come from the company that they are spoofing. Sometimes the website has graphics for the company they are trying to appear as and the URL is in CHINA! First off, No company shuld EVER ask you to click on a link and enter personal information for things. No mortgage company I know of will actually advertise in a spam and if they do, then your alert flag should go up. If you just use common sense, you should be more then able to determine if a web page or e-mail is a phishing attempt. Unfortunately, your grandma or your mom may not. I think that companies liek AOL need to add more training wheels to their service so to speak and help them with determining if something is legit or not. Would I ever load such software? No I would not because I don't need it....but my mom might.

    --

    Gorkman

    1. Re:Here's my Anti-Phishing tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that companies liek AOL need to add more training wheels to their service so to speak and help them with determining if something is legit or not.

      That goes against AOL's mushroom policy. The only way AOL got to be so big is to firstly apeal to the truely clueless, and secondly to keep them clueless by creating propriety systems which are "pretty" and "easy" and "fun" to the clueless and prevent them from ever gaining even half a clue about how to use non-aol systems.

  17. AntiPhishiing.org by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is more information, the SANS Internet Storm Center has seen much activity (and growing) of this shit.



    --------

  18. so the cure to prevent phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting


    is to install a spyware toolbar ?

    i have enough trouble persuading users NOT to install crappy toolbars and plugins as it is without people reccomending that they do,
    MS ActiveX and to a lesser extent Mozilla's XPInstall xpi features coupled with uninformed users are the main reason spyware/malware exists and is so easy to exploit, can you explain the difference to a (l)user between a good plugin/toolbar and a bad one ?

    security should be built into the browser

  19. Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by gtrubetskoy · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Phishers need a place to host their fake sites, and hosting companies like ours are prime targets for phishers to set up their "collection points", and we see a lot of those.

    My theory is that unlike the script-kiddies of the old days, 99% of all phishing is work of organized crime. I believe that they recruit users at ISP's in places where internet (or any for that matter) law is not enforced (like Kosovo), they provide people simple step-by-step instructions on what to do, give them lists of fake card numbers and pay them based on the number of accounts hacked (e.g. $1 for every 50 good passwords). The actual cleaning out of the accounts probably happens elsewhere and at a much higher level because you need a much more elaborate system for it (off-shore bank accounts, etc). At least if I was doing it, this is how I would set it up. The users appear to be not very smart - we often see weird typos, names spelled in all caps and other dead giveaways - why would ANNE FISHER from Ohio signup for a year of virtual hosting and register a domain XABCDFERNG.COM for 10 years?

    We see that they are getting more elaborate in their attempts to sign up for an account. They try to use proxies or zombies now (because most same companies will flat out refuse any attempts to sign up from Indonesia, Romania, etc.).

    A funny side note - we got a copy of a credit card statement from one of the unfortunate cardmembers whose card's been stolen as part of the "chargeback" report, and among various hosting accounts they signed up for, there was an $20 contribution to moveon.org - go figure!

    Right now the best way to fight off phishers is to attempt to speak to the customer in person, it has worked 100% for us so far. But since this phishing thing is probably big money for some mafia boss, I think the motivation is there for them to get more technologically advanced, and I wouldn't be surprised if we start seeing fake VoIP phone numbers provided where the criminals would answer the phone in English and pretend to be cardmembers.

    Another very unfortunate side-ffect of this is that it's the merchants who east the cost of it. For every instance of fraud, we get the funds withheld and transferred back to the cardmember (don't be fooled by those reports of "poor" cc companies bearing the cost of fraud!) AND we get slapped with an $25-$50 penalty by the CC processing company AND our rates go up. So it's almost in their interest that cards get stolen, it simply means more revenue for them. Now our services are "virtual", but for those who actually ship something physical (like a shirt), they get to eat the cost of that as well.

    1. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by Kenja · · Score: 1
      "My theory is that unlike the script-kiddies of the old days, 99% of all phishing is work of organized crime."

      This is very true, not only of Phishing but also of eBay scams and the like. Most of the "Work At Home for $$$$" style of adds are buying and selling items for the Russian mafia.

      --

      "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    2. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've always found the credit card companies and banks ability to shift the financial responsibility onto merchants and users for their insecure system to be one of the greatest ripoffs in history. Merchants in particular take it up the dirt road -- chargebacks, penalties AND rate increases! And zero incentive for the people who created and control the system to do anything about it.

      I hate to say "they should pass a law", but they SHOULD pass a law that pushes the cost of CC fraud back onto banks and the CC companies themselves. This would provide a much bigger incentive.

      What's even better is that once the new bankruptcy bill goes into force, not only will banks not have to bear the burden of fraud, they won't have to bear the burden of irresponsible lending, either.

    3. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by JoeBuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Every phishing scam I've seen get through my spam filters gave itself away, because the e-mails are all written by people who are either not fluent in English or who are too illiterate to get a job as a junior secretary in any English-speaking country.

      The biggest threat would be if any of these guys ever hires a native English speaker who can write, and thinks a bit about what a real e-mail from a big corporation might look like.

    4. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather than creating a new law, why not just refuse to accept credit cards which do that. Instead you could use something like Paypal or E-Gold.

    5. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Rather than creating a new law, why not just refuse to accept credit cards which do that. Instead you could use something like Paypal or E-Gold.

      PayPal has its own problems, do some googling.

      The actual service that the credit card companies provide is a network of trust. As a cardmember you have been verified to be credible, and as a merchant you have also been verified to be credible and to provide good product. When a merchant accepts a credit card payment, it counts on the fact that this customer has been deemed credible by the credit card company. Same is true vice-versa - as a customer buying something from a merchant, you have more assurance of trust and some protection, such as ability to contest charges.

      By being negligent in not strengthening anti-fraud and by pushing all liabilities to merchants the credit card companies (who are also near-monopolies now) are plainly deceiving their own customers (who are merchants and cardholders), and that is something that Ashcroft should pay attention to (instead of all this patriot act and dmca crap).

    6. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by swb · · Score: 1

      [...]and that is something that Ashcroft should pay attention to (instead of all this patriot act and dmca crap).

      Absolutely. It's sad that the government is so unwilling to do put any meaingful resources towards keeping markets free from fraud and corruption; allowing markets to be dominated by fraud and corruption will do more to undermine America than all the terrorists put together.

    7. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by benzapp · · Score: 1

      A great post, but the raping of the people by banks has been going on now for a century. We fought two world wars over it.

      In reality, credit card fraud is a tiny way banks fuck the people. It is absolute peanuts compared to what the federal reserve does every single day.

      Fraud sucks, surely, but the real root problem here is usury itself.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    8. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by swb · · Score: 1

      What wars did we fight over banking specifically or usury generally?

      IIRC, there's some Lyndon LaRouche-esque conspiracy linking the Windsors and the "global financial system", which might imply that US involvement in WWI/WWII could have been attributed to some fight over banking.

    9. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by Electrum · · Score: 1

      Rather than creating a new law, why not just refuse to accept credit cards which do that.

      Because merchants who do that will lose business.

    10. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by benzapp · · Score: 1

      So, you really believe WWI was started to further Serbian national interests? Or that WWII was started to preserve Polish independence?

      Read up on a little further. Google is your friend.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    11. Re:Phishing is a big problem for hosting companies by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      The biggest threat would be if any of these guys ever hires a native English speaker who can write, and thinks a bit about what a real e-mail from a big corporation might look like.

      Or, even better, just copy-n-paste a legitimate e-mail from said corporation, and insert a "fishy" (I refuse to use the "ph" in this case, dammit, because this has NOTHING to do with the band and it just looks stupid) URL in place of the "click here" in the original e-mail.

      On a related note, dontcha just love when you get these e-mails from companies you've never done business with? I keep getting them from Citi and US Bank. How dumb do they think I am?

      p

  20. Backwards by RU_Areo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can't put somebody in a car and tell them to drive, but not tell them what the brake and gas pedal are for

    I think this statement is completely backwards. You can give someone the tools; ie. tell them what the gas and brake are for, but under no circumstances can you make them use them (properly) or understand the full consequences of not using them this is especially true for users who are not technically inclined.

  21. Kaput? by BigBadBus · · Score: 2, Informative
    Is this the "eBay custom user toolbar" thats been broken by XP SP2?

  22. List of IPs used by phishers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Phish Net

    Some folks here may find it usefull.

  23. Cool phishing detection quiz by frozenray · · Score: 5, Informative


    This nifty quiz can help you assess your phishing detection abilities. Recommended.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
    1. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      I did pretty good on that quiz, but the only one I got wrong was #4 (the U.S. Bank one). Interestingly enough, I don't really know why, unless it's because U.S. bank doesn't exist. The URL looks valid (it's of the form https://*.usbank.com/*), and the format of the quiz means you can't see where that URL is actually pointing to.

      Is there something I can be doing better?

    2. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      100% .. was not that hard. Of course I stop phishing for a living. I only got the hotmail one because it was professionally written and mentioned only losing messages and addresses, something I know to be a fact of life about account expiration on hotmail and yahoo mail both. That it didn't say "your account will be suspended" or some other stern warning made it look less like a phish. All the others were just dead giveaways.

      No one who wants your business is going to waggle their finger and scold you about taking action NOW or you will lose your account, the way most of the phishers do. Even if you haven't payed them -- they just suspend it and tell you to call them on the phone.

    3. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      one thing that quiz showed me was basic javascript needed to make checking the url shown in the status bar at bottom of the browser useless.

    4. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by switcha · · Score: 1
      look again at the URL. www4?

      I got suckered by the earthlink one. The address looked valid, although, if I got this, I would never use the link.

      My rule is to navigate to my providers website myself, log on, and see if there was anything that needed updating.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
    5. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by akintayo · · Score: 1

      If you check the status bar the url is for a Brazilian site. Of course the Earthlink one fakes the status bar url, so it seems you need to look at the source also.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    6. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by bucuo · · Score: 1

      http://www4.blah

    7. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by julesh · · Score: 1

      If you check the status bar the url is for a Brazilian site.

      Hmmm...? I didn't get any status bar text on any of the links in that test, and when I used right click/properties to get the address, it linked back to the test page.

    8. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by jorupp · · Score: 1

      The basic rule I follow is:

      Never trust that a link in an email is going where it says it is. Never.

      That was what made me think #4 was a phish.

      My thoughts on the list:
      #1: sounds reasonable, so I guessed it wasn't a phish, though I still wouldn't follow that link if I wanted 'Extra Storage' -- log into the hotmail website and find the link there.
      #2: Wants me to 'update my information', and supplies URL to follow to do it? That's a phish.
      #3: Looks pretty convincing, but the threat to suspend my account if I don't do it makes it sound like a phish. It might cause me to log into my account and look for a 'verify now' link -- if it was major enought to send to all users, it's on the website.
      #4: See above: link in email to 'verify information' -- yeah right.
      #5: The steps they give to update my information involve going directly to the paypal website -- looks legit. Definately worth logging into paypal and checking.
      #6: Earthlink won't contact you exclusively via email to tell you there's a problem with billing -- they'd call.
      #7: Yet another 'verify your information' with a link in the email -- phish.
      #8: a pretty badly worded fraud -- eBay would write their email in better English. That and the link in the email....
      #9: This looks pretty legit, though warning bells would go off if the USPS link requested my PayPal info. I wouldn't follow the lower link though -- log into Paypal and view the transaction history if you really want to see it.
      #10: Looks pretty slick, but again, it's your standard 'I'm Visa, follow me' trick.

      Remember: Never assume a link goes where it says it goes. If it's something you value, navigate there yourself.

    9. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by lpangelrob2 · · Score: 1
      The www4 only shows that it's a subdomain of usbank.com, though. That shouldn't prove anything unless usbank.com leases its subdomains to irresponsible phishers.

      Examples:

    10. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by akintayo · · Score: 1

      Status bar works for me, and I am using IE. The actual links are dead but the status bar does show 'the url'

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    11. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by gblues · · Score: 1
      All the others were just dead giveaways.

      If you say so. I incorrectly flagged two of the paypal e-mails as fraudulent because they both read like Engrish (AKA poorly translated Japanese text).

      Nathan

    12. Re:Cool phishing detection quiz by switcha · · Score: 1
      True, for sure, but can you find an example of an institution that handles secure things like banking and investments communicating with it's customers via a leased subdomain?

      Not saying it doesn't happen, but just saying that's what would raise a red flag for me. If it's so dang important that my account status (or whatever) is in jeopardy, it better be coming from the top dog link.

      --
      You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  24. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My Anti Phishing tool is my brain. I mean sometimes these phishing e-mails are nto even spoof so that they appear to come from the company that they are spoofing. Sometimes the website has graphics for the company they are trying to appear as and the URL is in CHINA! First off, No company shuld EVER ask you to click on a link and enter personal information for things. No mortgage company I know of will actually advertise in a spam and if they do, then your alert flag should go up. If you just use common sense, you should be more then able to determine if a web page or e-mail is a phishing attempt. Unfortunately, your grandma or your mom may not. I think that companies liek AOL need to add more training wheels to their service so to speak and help them with determining if something is legit or not. Would I ever load such software? No I would not because I don't need it....but my mom might.

    I don't know... I was told that phishing scams often played on misspellings, so my "red alert" flag is going up on your message.

  25. should be a firefox plugin by jdkane · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone should create a phishing-detection extension for Mozilla. Does anybody have any ideas about how that would work efficiently/effectively? Same as EBay technology?

    1. Re:should be a firefox plugin by jdkane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I should have added "free" extension, not restricted by licensing and/or money in general.

    2. Re:should be a firefox plugin by Cheerio+Boy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Firefox plugin you're looking for is Spoofstick.

      A little simple but it tells you exactly what site you're on.

      They also have one for IE.

      --

      "Bah!" - Dogbert
    3. Re:should be a firefox plugin by mikeage · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my original submission, that's what I'd asked. Taco decided not to post my entire submission...

      --
      -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  26. Nice try by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an anti-phishing tool available that tries to detect fake websites.

    I may be relatively new to the internet, but after my son cleaned my PC last month of a bunch of maluair, he told me to never install any tools for my internet, no matter how good it sounds. So you can hawk your "useful" tool as much as you want, I ain't biting.

  27. Firefox/IE by mrseigen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed that neither Firefox nor new versions of IE let you do the www.cnn.com@http://myattackersite.com phishing vulnerability; Firefox warns you (as long as myattackersite.com doesn't request authentication), IE just doesn't let you do it as far as I've seen (but this is hearsay; I haven't used IE in years).

    1. Re:Firefox/IE by julesh · · Score: 1

      Just tested on IE 6.0 on Windows 2000. It allows you to click on such a link without any warnings, but the '...@' section disappears from the URL when it is displayed in the address bar, which ought to give you at least some feedback.

    2. Re:Firefox/IE by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "the '...@' section disappears from the URL when it is displayed in the address bar, which ought to give you at least some feedback."

      And it takes you to the site *before* the @, rather than the site after the @, right? The way the exploit worked was that stuff before an @ is username/password info, so that www.cnn.com@http://fake.example.com would send you to fake.example.com rather than www.cnn.com (which of course was where you thought that you were going).

      IIRC, this vulnerability existed as late as IE6, but has since been fixed with patches (i.e. unpatched IE6 still has this vulnerability).

    3. Re:Firefox/IE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just tried www.cnn.com@yahoo.com and Mozilla 1.6 went to yahoo.com, not pretty. IE5 does the same.

      Funny thing is, I've never seen a phishing scam that actually took advantage of this, especially the kind where you convert the IP of the site you're pointing to to DWORD format so it isn't even visible. You could create one of those really long paypal.com URLs, then append the @fake.com in it and no one would know. (Unless they say that it now says yahoo.com in the URL bar, but can't you fix that with an invisible frame?)

      There are forums out there where this type of fraud is discussed, but I'd rather not post about it here. All sorts of passwords and CCs are bought and sold. Even the sale of manufactured credit cards with whatever name and numbers you want on it, as well as genuine-looking IDs.

    4. Re:Firefox/IE by s0meguy · · Score: 1

      IE with XP SP2 now shows you the real domain at the top left of a pop-up window, a little detail that will make it quite a bit harder to effectively show a bogus (phishing) popup form in front of a genuine banking site.

  28. SPF for Websites by jeffy210 · · Score: 1

    What about using something similar to the Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for web sites. Create a list of known good websites for your company, and if the browser attempts to access something say eBay related, it will look at eBay's SPF list and see wether it's an authorized server or not.

    --
    ------
    "And may your days be long upon the earth."
  29. I just looked at the list by G27+Radio · · Score: 2, Informative

    There are not many unique addresses in the list; most are repeated many times throughout the it. And there are a couple that just aren't valid IP addresses at all. Not much of a list yet, but good luck with it anyway.

    1. Re:I just looked at the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks - its an early work in progress.

  30. needs to happen by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 1

    this needs to happen, but it's like a spam Blacklist, it's pretty much out of date once it's created! better would be to have ISPs build a lists and flag certain sites as possible phishing grounds, but there again, how up to date would they be?

    Bottom line is, all of our parents/kids/friends need to know; don't give info out online unless YOU initiated the contact.

    CB#__8&*(#@

    1. Re:needs to happen by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      Bottom line is, all of our parents/kids/friends need to know; don't give info out online unless YOU initiated the contact.

      Agreed, but then you get morons like Barclays Bank (in the UK, at least) who call up their customers on the phone and ask them to give personal details "for security"...

      I kid you not!

      I cringe every time I hear this (no, I don't bank with them myself... so don't call ;)

  31. Re:Nice try, indeed. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    If your son is the one 'fixing' your PC, what are you doing here?

    Methinks you took a wrong turn by the AOL boards.

  32. A better start by portwojc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Web Caller-ID is not a cure-all for the phishing problem

    How about actually going after the people doing the scams as a solution. Also the providers who don't shut them down.

    I must have missed that part in the article. This is going to be just like the spam problem. It's a problem that the end user needs to deal with and not something to be corrected at the source. Well not until at least it gets to epidemic proportions.

    1. Re:A better start by Cutter · · Score: 1
      How about actually going after the people doing the scams as a solution.

      I just reported one of these bank phishing emails to a Brazilian provider and Comcast. I want to see how long it takes them to kill the accounts. I'll not be holding my breath though.
      --
      ---- If only I could be respected without having to be respectable.
    2. Re:A better start by Cutter · · Score: 1

      I just reported one of these bank phishing emails to a Brazilian provider and Comcast. I want to see how long it takes them to kill the accounts. I'll not be holding my breath though.

      Well Comcast seems to be on the ball today. That site seems to be gone. Under 2 hours for action to be taken. Either that or the phisher moved on but I prefer to be optimistic :)

      --
      ---- If only I could be respected without having to be respectable.
  33. Anti-Phishing Tool by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny
    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  34. Come on, we can't possibly... by cnelzie · · Score: 1

    ...want to see the general populace actually become smart enough to see everyday scams.

    What will I do for fun if I am not able to see those extremely hilarious informercials about how you can do *nothing* and the fat will just dissolved off your body!

    --
    If you ignore the other uses of a tool, does that make the tool less useful, or you less useful?
    1. Re:Come on, we can't possibly... by Mouse42 · · Score: 1

      ...want to see the general populace actually become smart enough to see everyday scams.

      If the general populace is smart enough to catch on to these crafty scams, they might also be smart enough to turn on their monitor and spare you the easy tech support call when their computer "wouldn't turn on."

      As much as you gripe about the stupidity and "waste of time," you gotta appreciate being paid for that "waste of time," no?

    2. Re:Come on, we can't possibly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That works. If you do nothing, where nothing includes not eating, the fat will just dissolve off of your body (not literally dissolve, but colloquially close enough)

  35. Re:Nice try, indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    % perl -e 'print teamhasnoi.hasSenseOfHumor()'
    0
    %

  36. Had a bit of a scare, recently by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got an email from Earthlink that looks SO MUCH like a textbook Phishing scam ( your credit card number's going to expire... ) that I deleted it the first couple times it came my way.

    It kept on coming, however, and I decided to go to earthlink myself ( e.g., not clicking the link ) and see what the deal was.

    Turned out, it was legit. Amazing.

    The trouble here, really, is how do we handle legitimate email from banks, ISPs, etc?

    --

    lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
    1. Re:Had a bit of a scare, recently by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      The trouble here, really, is how do we handle legitimate email from banks, ISPs, etc?

      As someone asserted earlier, Web Caller-ID is probably not the solution for email validation. Don't email header analysis, WHOIS (where applicable), and traceroute provide enough leads? Perhaps a software tool that automates and abstracts this process would be more appropriate. (Or perhaps Web Caller-ID provides this functionality?)

      Web Caller-ID would seem to be particularly useful when used to deconstruct sites that don't attempt to emulate a brand-name website, since the benchmark in such cases isn't as obvious. Although the article emphasizes spoofs of established sites such as Citibank, eBay, etc., anyone adept enough to use Web Caller-ID effectively should be able to spot spoofs of such sites without the aid of ad hoc software.

  37. The link's dead! by cuzality · · Score: 1

    Damn!

    http://www.advertysement.com/ is slashdotted already!

  38. spf by nexus987 · · Score: 1

    Too bad e-bay won't take the time to publish SPF records (spf.pobox.com) or microsoft "caller ID" records. It would probabaly take them less than a minute...

  39. What banks *should* do! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What banks (and eBay) should do is NEVER, EVER send an email to customers. Period.

    And on their websites they should say on top: "REMEMBER: WE *NEVER* SEND YOU EMAIL ABOUT ANYTHING."

    If you want to know something, you just visit eBay or your bank account.

    1. Re:What banks *should* do! by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 1

      What banks (and eBay) should do is NEVER, EVER send an email to customers.

      What a shame that it's come to this. Once upon a time, we were all clamoring for all correspondence to be moved to email--and for good reason, too.

      sigh

      b&

      --
      All but God can prove this sentence true.
    2. Re:What banks *should* do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right. Better yet, they should stop offering online services.

    3. Re:What banks *should* do! by DrJonesAC2 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunatly (For eBay anyway) email is an integral part of thier system. They communicate solely with thier members via email for everything from support issues to general announcements. Yes you can get the information from the ebay page but many (And I mean MANY) users would find that too difficult and stop using eBay altogether.
      The only option is to do as much education as possible.

    4. Re:What banks *should* do! by Scorchio · · Score: 1

      A bit extreme. What they should do is make sure they never include any links in emails, instead telling the customer to log on to the main bank site. They'll also need to force the fact down the customer's neck that no legitimate email will contain links.

      I had one from the Bank of America a few weeks ago reminding me of how quick and easy it is for me to pay bills online through their bill paying service. There were links to the online banking pages, including the login, on the server "bankofamerica1.com". I'm sat there scratching my head and resorting to whois enquiries to make sure bankofamerica1.com belongs to the Bank of America. I'd suddenly got very worried because I'd previously clicked a link in a similar BofA email and logged in. The fact that it was just advertising a feature rather than the more obvious "log in here to verify your account details" caught me off guard. It could have so easily been a subtle phishing tactic.

    5. Re:What banks *should* do! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1
      I had one from the Bank of America a few weeks ago reminding me of how quick and easy it is for me to pay bills online through their bill paying service.

      This type of Phishing is especially bad! I've been seeing a similar thing: I get a question about an ebay auction. Just a simple question, no "we need to verify your account" or anything. While I wasn't stooopid enough to click on the link accidentally, I followed one of them to see where I go. Sure enough, the link is to a very convincing looking ebay login page; as if I needed to login to see sellers history or something.

      While I can train a canonical "Mom" not to answer emails that say "Your bank needs to verifyt your mother's maiden name and social", I'm not so sure I can protect her against these other than to say "NEVER, EVER LOOK AT ANY EMAIL FROM A BANK OR EBAY". If you're running an auction, just keep going back to eBay for the info.

    6. Re:What banks *should* do! by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      If you want to know something, you just visit eBay or your bank account.

      Why? Because your stolen information is likely to be available on eBay?

    7. Re:What banks *should* do! by jesser · · Score: 1

      While I can train a canonical "Mom" not to answer emails that say "Your bank needs to verifyt your mother's maiden name and social", I'm not so sure I can protect her against these other than to say "NEVER, EVER LOOK AT ANY EMAIL FROM A BANK OR EBAY". If you're running an auction, just keep going back to eBay for the info.

      What's so hard about "Always check that you're actually on ebay.com after following a link from an e-mail"?

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    8. Re:What banks *should* do! by callipygian-showsyst · · Score: 1

      I'll give you my mom's phone number and you can see for yourself!

  40. Re:Wrong Solution (need PK crypto) by j1m+5n0w · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The proper solution to phishing scams is 1) Educate everyone not to give out confidential information to anyone. 2) Track the phishing sites and publically hang the owner. These things are not difficult to track by the very nature of the scam.

    Don't forget

    3) Use public key cryptography to verify the authenticity of sites you do business with.

    -jim

  41. Better Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most of these phishing sites are set to get passwords and CC numbers. Solution: use one-time passwords as in Scandinavian banks, for all things involving CC and money. The phishers can grab your passwords all they want, they'll be useless.

  42. Simple idea. by JessLeah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When you get an email, at the top, 'caller ID' shows up (e.g. "This email was sent from: SOMEWHERE IN CHINA", vs. "This email was sent from: CITIBANK'S servers")

    When you mouseover a link, a LARGE JavaScript thingy pops up saying "This link is to: SOMEWHERE IN NIGERIA" or "This link is to: CITIBANK'S site"

  43. Here's a good way... by veritron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Phishing scams have no way to determine whether the password you enter is correct or incorrect.

    If you enter in an incorrect password/username combo and the site redirects you to the real site's password and login prompt or does something other than telling you your username/password combo is incorrect, then you're definitely dealing with a phishing scam.

    Of course, you can be clever and have the scam always return "wrong username/password." If the scam's set up to do that, the only way to tell that it's a scam is to enter... your correct password and username. Clever, eh?

    So if your password "doesn't work" for an indefinite period, and then suddenly starts working again when you actually go to the site that requires your name/password via google, do yourself a favor and change your damn password.

    1. Re:Here's a good way... by dozer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Phishing scams have no way to determine whether the password you enter is correct or incorrect.

      You're wrong. The phisher's site can immediately attempt logging into the legit site with the stolen credentials, then return an appropriate response to your browser. To you, at worst, it would look like typical net lag. This is so trivial to do that some phishers must already be doing this.

      In fact, they could just proxy your connection to the original site. This way, you would actually be using the legimate site -- you could not tell any difference. It's just that all traffic would be passing through the phisher's computers too, and they could grab whatever information they wanted.

  44. How is this better than SSL? by BilSabab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Let's make a couple of risky assumptions

    1) That as an educated user I only submit sensitive information over an SSL encrypted connection using an SSL certificate signed by a third party.

    2) That I check that the certificate corresponds to the site I'm visiting.

    This should prevent me from submitting any information to a phishing scam provided that I'm using a browser which correctly implements the SSL/TLS exchange.

    So why would a hosting company or a user bother with Web caller ID? A properly configured browser and SSL should prevent phishing attacks. Correct?

    --- Friends don't let friends sig

    1. Re:How is this better than SSL? by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would a certificate authority refuse to issue a certificate to a website called "services-paypal.com"? If not, then just checking for an SSL icon wouldn't do much. If people are fooled by "services-paypal.com" in the address bar, they'll probably be fooled by it again in the SSL information dialog box.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    2. Re:How is this better than SSL? by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      SSL doesn't help against lookalike domain names. Of course, anyone with eyes and abrain ought to be able to spot that, but most people need something a little more blatant.

    3. Re:How is this better than SSL? by taustin · · Score: 1

      You have to put a little thought in to how to get an SSL certificate without the issuer knowing how to find you. Not a lot of thought, but it at least takes some effort.

  45. Not enough info to determine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consider the hotmail example. I need to be able to see the full headers to determine which IP address it arrived from. I would also need to be able to see where the "purchase upgrade" link points, to see whether it's a phishified URL. Without those, I'd lean towards non-scam just from the generally correct spelling and non-suspicious nature of the request, but really that's not enough to be sure.

    1. Re:Not enough info to determine by bdigit · · Score: 1

      yea this quiz is not accurate at all. If i could see where some of these links actually led then I could determine what is a fraud. Its not hard to make a links text a look like this http://www.slashdot.org. except slashdot helps you cheat

    2. Re:Not enough info to determine by julesh · · Score: 1

      I would also need to be able to see where the "purchase upgrade" link points, to see whether it's a phishified URL.

      After taking the test and getting 8/10, I realised that that information was available... but only if you use Internet Explorer. It has some broken javascript to set the link target url into the status bar, only it doesn't work right in Mozilla, probably because of the 'return document.MM_ReturnValue' (or something utterly meaningless like that) on the end of the onMouseOver action.

    3. Re:Not enough info to determine by Speed+Racer · · Score: 1

      I used Firefox and still got 10/10 without seeing the links. I just figured they wanted to make the quiz especially hard.

      Then again, I'm a skeptical bastard. . .

      --
      Free Mac Mini. Yes, I'm
  46. fake anti-phish by DumbSwede · · Score: 1
    Worse yet, Malware makers will switch to disguising their downloads as anti-phish tools.

    Novice users hear about phishing, will think any old anti-phish tool will do.

  47. Education is not enough by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Scams I have seen recently seen involve setting up an infringing domain name, say "online-citi.us" instead of "citi-online.com". One cannot expect the users to remember the host name of all their finaince and shopping site. Even when the infringing domain yet yanked after a few hours, it can remain cached in DNS for a long time.

    Web-caller ID seems sensible - just get browsers to implement the web equivalent of SPF. Sounds pretty easy to me.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  48. Re:Nice try, indeed. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny
    % perl -e 'print teamhasnoi.hasSenseOfHumor()'
    0
    %

    Stop trying to infect me with your spyware! I'm wise to your tricks!

  49. phishing by ajs318 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Most of the scam e-mails don't render properly in KMail -- which is what I mostly use -- anyway. But if they did, I'd probably go ahead and fill in a whole bunch of bogus details anyway. Can't be too hard to write a script that does a HTTP GET on the site URL, then submits random data. Preferably plausible data ..... maybe we could borrow the spammers' trick of picking words that seem to go together? And, of course, credit card numbers that pass The Test ..... not difficult, you just generate a 15 digit random string, and calculate the check digit.

    IMHO the only thing missing from KMail is the ability to turn on and off off HTML rendering and image loading on a folder-by-folder basis (so I can view known "ham" e-mail in the format it was sent; but my brain already renders HTML so well that <em>this looks a bit slanty</em>).

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  50. Almost to comment #10000000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are only about 7000 away from the ten million comment mark. Lets just hope the lucky poster is not the GNAA guy.

  51. First step by bigberk · · Score: 5, Informative

    The first step is obviously to check the headers of an email you receive. Just see who sent you the damn thing (from Received headers). Was it actually an IP belonging to .paypal.com? This is easy to check using 'whois'. If the whois lookup shows the IP delivering you the email is from the company you expect (VISA, Paypal, Ebay) then it's fine.

    OK, how about an example. Take this US Bank phishing scam, here are the Received headers:

    Received: by mail.pc9.org (Postfix, from userid 82)
    id 2E7E6AC1B; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: from usbank.com (unknown [211.209.208.87])
    by mail.pc9.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCF24AC03
    for <bigberk@users.pc9.org>; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 07:13:47 -0700 (PDT)
    Received: from 0.212.252.18 by 211.209.208.87; Tue, 17 Aug 2004 09:08:18 -0600

    The first Received hop is my ISP. The second Received hop is the only important one; it describes the connecting host. Note that the host here pretended to be usbank.com but that name is a sender-supplied ID; it's worthless. What you're looking for is the IP address between square brackets, which can not be forged. Now just check 211.209.208.87 using whois

    $ whois 211.209.208.87
    ...
    [ Organization Information ]
    Organization ID : ORG3930
    Org Name : Hanaro Telecom Inc.
    State : SEOUL
    Address : Shindongah Bldg., 43 Taepyeongno2-Ga Jung-Gu
    Zip Code : 100-733
    ...

    See, easy. This email came from Korea, not US Bank. It's a scam!

  52. Another poor metaphor.... by phamlen · · Score: 1
    However, better user education and stronger security from online retailers, banks, and financial institutions is also needed to protect technically unsophisticated consumers from complex online cons like phishing attacks, Schmidt says. "You can't put somebody in a car and tell them to drive, but not tell them what the brake and gas pedal are for," he says.


    Let's hear it for poor metaphors! Let's see... in this context, the gas pedal is entering your credit card onto a fake website? No, wait - maybe using your brain is the gas pedal, and entering your credit card numbers is the brake? Oh, I know - he's referring to the difference between dialup and DSL! No...maybe he's suggesting everyone has to get a license before browsing the web! Or...

    I'm stumped!
    1. Re:Another poor metaphor.... by thebatlab · · Score: 2, Funny

      Metaphors and analogies don't always have to have a one-to-one relationship. He was simply saying to get people out of the get-on-the-net-and-go mindset and make them more aware of when to slow down and think. Geez. Someone had some Kellog's Frosted Bitchy Flakes for breakfast.

  53. Re:Nice try, indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    % perl -e 'teamhasnoi.attemptHumor() or die "abort: $!"'
    abort: Miserable failure.
    %

  54. Unfortunatly... by Phil+John · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...a large proportion of people using the internet don't even know what SSL means (or is), let alone what to check for. They just look for a padlock and think they're safe (many don't even do this).

    Users normally glaze over when they hear about certificate signing and how to check site authenticity and it's not like it's particularly hard (or expensive) to get an SSL cert these days, the last one I purchased only performed the bare minimum of checks (that I had an invoice for the server I was using to "prove" my identity, hardly what I call a method of high integrity).

    This kind of tech is just what the hordes of clueless AOL/internet users need, something to stop them hurting themselves on the internet, they are just like children that need looking after around the knife drawer.

    --
    I am NaN
  55. I think Phish appreciates this effort! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's only one true Phish website. I'm sure they're grateful to this new technology that helps keep people from being tricked into visiting websites belonging to boy bands, bleached blonde airheads, rappers or other so-called musicians. :)

    [Hint to mods: The band Phish has been around about 20 years longer than the word 'phishing'. ]

  56. Eh? by TheGax · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I thought Phish broke up....

  57. earthlink anti-phishing tool by valmont · · Score: 1

    earthlink has a free toolbar that has their "scamblocker" thing and their pop-up blocker. I reviewed their scamblocker in one of my blog entries.

  58. We need certificates with teeth by Animats · · Score: 1
    We need a scheme where you can't enter a credit card number into a site unless the page is signed by somebody who stands behind the site's identity.

    It would be useful to have a feature in browsers which looked for forms into which you were entering something that looked like a credit card number. This is tough, because it has to work with hostile websites. Web sites might put text in images, or even set up a form in Flash. That has to be detected.

    When the browser detects a credit card number going in, it checks the page. It must be a secure page, it must be signed, and the certificate must be one with a Relying Party Agreement that financially guarantees the identity of the site owner. (This means something like a Verisign SecureSite certificate. Those "certifies nothing" $29.95 certificates aren't good enough.)

    Yes, some low-end e-commerce sites will be locked out. Did you really want to buy from them anyway?

    1. Re:We need certificates with teeth by Animats · · Score: 1
      Some relying party agreements, with notes:
      • GeoTrust. No warranty. Certificate worthless. Reject.
      • Entrust Disclaims all warranties. Certificate worthless. Reject.
      • Pttrust This one is very funny. There are some notes at the bottom about links that need to be fixed up. But generally follows Verisign's approach, with warranties. Probably OK.
      • DigiSign. Certificate quality varies. Some are validated, some aren't. Probably best to reject.
      • Thawte Certificate quality varies. Only High Assurance certificates should be accepted.
      This sort of thing needs to be automated, with some organization like the EFF, EPIC, or Consumer's Union rating the certificate issuers.
  59. Now make it useable by soroka · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Very well done, bigberk! It is a realistic example. But still it is an example. Actually banks almost never send such emails, so when you get a message from a bank asking to spread your guts on their site it is almost surely a phishing exercise.

    However I recently found myself in the middle of a transaction in cold sweat realising that it could have been phishing! ( I did my first SSL related project in 2000, and I still believe there is smth behind the glasses :)

    Ok, imagine receiving a message from MIT press advertising a discount on a book you wanted to buy. Should I tell that I did not whois the senders IP but when credit card authorisation failed I freaked out. Fortunatly, this was a genuine email and a genuine error this time, but what if it were not!

    Another scenario: You google for a thing and in the second page of results you find a very good price. Will you check the certificates of the http over SSL site and whois the IPs?

    Actually in all email programs from the very early years to the latest Outlook there is a facility to see the whole header of the message. It should not be too difficult to incorporate the whois requests in a similar way. So that when the user receives an email with a link that she wants to follow, she can get a report similar to the one that bigberk found manualy.

    It is not a bit more difficult to do the same thing with google: Just add a link to a script that generates a whois report.

    One problem I see is that if this feature will become popular, the present whois service capacity may not be sufficient: as far as I know there is a single server to cover the whole of Asia-Pacific domains.

  60. Most effective anti-phishing tool known to man. by immanis · · Score: 1

    It's called a bookmark.

  61. I remember when phishing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was an AOL thing. You know, back in the mid-late 90's people would im you saying they were the AOL Billing department and either ask you to "verify" your password or sometimes they would ask for billing information but usually just the password.

    My how things have changed.

  62. "Phishing"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Am I the only one who doesn't understand this term? I probably am, since nobody bothers to briefly explain it in their posts, which probably happened for some time when I missed the whole thing altogether...

    I feel sorry for Phish the band. Then again, I still eat Spam, so maybe it's quite all right after all.

    1. Re:"Phishing"? by shrewmy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      From what I understand, basically you collect a big list of emails (or chat names, I don't know how much that goes on anymore) and e-mail them with an e-mail that you're from such and such company, and that they lost this or that information or you need to update it. Then they click a link in the email to go to the authentic looking but fake page, put their information in, and it gets sent to a file or email account the phisher set up.

      I remember back when I used to go on Prodigy chat (I know AOL had these programs too, probably Compuserve also) there were all sorts of stupid chat room disrupting programs. One of the features a lot of them had was a "Phisher" which would collect peoples names off of the "Whos Chatting" list things in the rooms, and once you get a big enough collection you type in your scam line (ex "Greetings! I'm from the Prodigy(R) Billing Support Department. We've been having some issues with your account, and need you to certify your billing information. To accomplish this we will need your current billing address and the type, number, and expiration date of the credit card you have signed up for our services with." and click a button.

      It'd automatically instant message everyone on the list with the message, and 5 minutes later or so you'll have a crapload of replies ranging from their info, to very colorful takes on the phrase "no i will not give it to you, idiot", to the CHAT Host telling you you're now suspended from chat. Usually you're doing it from accounts you've already phished, so it doesn't matter that you got suspended, because you probably just picked up 10 or more accounts anyways.

      The worst part of Prodigy as opposed to AOL was that on Prodigy you could have more than one user signed on at a time. If you phished a master account, you set yourself up your own account and no one's the wiser. Unlike AOL which AFAIK only allows one screen name on at a time, and tells you when someone's already signed on. That might've changed now, who knows? On Prodigy though, you could IM people by account numbers OR chat names (account numbers and chat names were separate, accounts were ABCD12(A-F), and A was the master. There used to be some good chat logs floating around from people who set up a "user account" (letters B-F) and IMed the master account that they phished earlier.

      It was amazing the amount of people that would bite, especially on Prodigy where most people had their user ID shown in their Chat Info (like an AOL profile but more basic) so you could pick out the master accounts and not deal with the regular users.

      Basically you've got your "pond", which is the email addresses or chat names, your "fishing pole and bait" which would be the email or instant message, and you "cast it out" and wait around to see what you can catch. No idea where the PH- came from, but I have a good idea judging from how the super leet hackers typed back then.

      Sorry for the livejournaling, but thinking back to the days of Prodigy chat made me a little nostalgic. :)

  63. At Least inform the public about this by charliekowalchuk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've bought some large items on ebay, but the best place to find scammers is when your buying expensive laptops. I've seen a lot of phishing for ebay. I saw a recent report, in which perdicted that for every legit technology buisness, there are two scam ones.

    The most important thing, Citibank and Ebay and the others is to inform their current and future customers about problems such as this. The worst thing they can do is not talk about it, pretend the problem will go away, or it is an isolated inncedent. (I'm telling ya, if Firefighters took the same approach at doing their job...)

    I like to think that some of my attention I brought to ebay, has paved some of the way, as they seem to be taking a stand to this kind of scam. For instance, now you can forward phishy looking emails to spoof@ebay.com.

    Now if you surf the web, hundreds of hits come up when discussing phish and spoof emails regarding Ebay and the like, but just 8 months ago, I found only one hit (and it was actually claiming this to be a real email, not a fake), regarding a fake authentic ebay email, encoraging me that it was alright to pay Western Union with this one particular seller, because he has special circumstances, and ebay will give buyer protection, up to 80% of the sell price. And Ebay themselves gave NO reference to any kind of knowledge or other cases that this kind of stuff was going on and one should be catious.

    I hate to mention it, but it is rumored that alot of this stuff, being so well organized with their i's dotted and T's crossed is because some/most of these scams is being ran by various mafia.

  64. Proud to provide hosting to the ies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Makes me proud to be an employee of AboveNet everytime I read a ticket about child pornography and phishing scams which the majority point back to about.com one of our highest paying customers :)

    Oh yeah and we also provide optical transport for a good 2/3 of all the internet's spam. s00t w00t g0 AboveNet/MFN!!!11eleventy

  65. What have they got against jam bands? by jmiles · · Score: 1

    Any word on whether Trey Anastacio & Co. have planned a lawsuit similar to that of a certain processed meat company for this eggregious misuse of their product name? :)

    (I think it's representative of the proclivities of the slashdot readership that it hasn't posted a dumb joke like this in the three hours that this story's been up. Or maybe it's just not funny...)

    --
    Anecdotal evidence! I'm sold!
  66. Need this technology for the jukebox by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    If only the jukebox at the local bar had this anti-phish technology, then I wouldn't have to put up with some putz playing "Bounce around the Room" three times back to back all the time.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  67. Spoofstick Evaded by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I found a Citi phish in my spam-magnet email box and it evaded spoofstick: It went to move.kir.jp and very quickly redirected to web.da-us.citibank.com, which is the real Citi site. However, it left a menu-bar-less (and thus Spoof-stick-less) little window open which asked for Debit Card No, PIN, and Checking Accunt No, and then connected to move.kir.jp:

    www.citibank.com/?wBaObw7wXXYFv1PH9iuP8e8p8y4491 7d 2lhBJFkSUwjnw0C3PIGwmjY8r

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  68. Only... by drphuck · · Score: 1

    Only script kiddies use "ph" as a replacement for "f"...
    Oh wait...

    --
    "Software is like sex... it's better when it's free"
  69. Easy Anti-Phish Rules by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Here are my easy anti-phish rules that should allow almost any user to avoid all phishing scams:

    - NEVER enter personal information into anything other than your web browser
    - NEVER enter information unless the lock icon is displayed in the browser status bar, not just on a page
    - NEVER enter information without first double-clicking the lock and verifying that the address is correct and correctly spelled.

    What browser manufacturers can do is this:
    - Make it more clear when you are on an SSL page. This needs to be non-forgable by websites. Make a big notification in the status bar, and make it impossible to turn the status bar off.

  70. BAN SCAMMER COUNTRIES FROM THE INTERNET by spyware+scams_suck · · Score: 1
    Education will only help so long. What happens when someone writes a worm/virus that replaces the /etc/hosts file with one hacked up to send people to phishing sites instead of banking sites?

    I'm beginning to think ICANN or whoever is responsible for internet access should just BAN anyone from these scammer countries or whatever other country they're using to scam on unless they have genuine official business on the internet. This would really reduce the scammers' abilities to scam. And Law enforcement has to be a lot better with heavier penalties.

    Education only goes so far. Technology(like ebay's toolbar) only go so far before the scammer evolves.......

    when buyers were getting scammed on ebay to wire money for expensive stuff like laptops, ebay people recommended buyers use escrow. Guess what the scammers did? They made fake escrow websites and buyers got scammed again.

    when buyers wouldn't trust the escrow sites and wouldn't trust dealing with foreign countries, guess what the scammers did? They now use people who are desperate for jobs in the US as "foils" or "agents" by pretending they're an overseas company that hires the "foils" so they can use their Paypal accounts and have them send $$$ overseas to these scammers. Sometimes they'll just say they'll give them a reward of some kind in items or money if they can use their Paypal accounts. Then, the scammers use their stolen Credit Card numbers to "buy" items off of sellers and send these to the buyers. Guess what happens then? That's right, Police come knocking on the buyers' doors and the foil's door.

    Govt officials won't help you out unless the $$$ amount is over the thousands. The scammers' country government are most times just scam accomplices or don't care.

    What's all this forcing ME to do? Ditch IE browser for another browser. Firewall & AV on all the time. I no longer store financial/personal info on my computer. I do less business on the anonymous web and especially less on evilbay and would rather do business locally in person. I've pretty much ditched my email. If my banks or anyone need to contact me, they can do so the old fashioned way----->U.S. mail.

    --
    * weedshare.com 50% to artists, webjay.org iuma.com CDBaby.com Epitonic.com ampcast.com
  71. Re:Wrong Solution (need PK crypto) by Alsee · · Score: 1

    Don't forget

    4) Use pencil and peper to hand verify the public key cryptogracy signature.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.