Slashdot Mirror


Current Crop Of HDTV Recorders Compared

rbrander links to this "nice review of all the HDTV Recorders from the Washington Post: DirecTV's based on the TiVo wins for best interface, but Dish Network's gets a few nods. There's also a nice swipe ('...spectacularly stupid decision') at JVC's for allowing only (copy-protected) Firewire input to the one HDTV tape recorder on the market."

177 comments

  1. What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by Frac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've recently built myself a nice HTPC with two tuners (Hauppauge PVR-250), and I'm quite happy with it. I intend to move onto HDTV capture cards once the most popular PVR software packages (SageTV, Beyond TV) supports it.

    Does anyone know what the state of the HDTV capture cards for PC looks like right now? Obviously, hardware encoding and picture quality is key...

    1. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      HDTV capture cards have a slight advantage over typical TV capture cards because they don't have to digitize anything from analog, they just have to remember the bitstream they were fed from the channel.

      Their disadvantage is that HDTV can be quite the high-bandwidth application, and that means the limitations of the PCI bus, and even the AGP connection can sometimes cause quality loss. PCI Express seems to be the solution to that in the pipeline, and that's most likely what the mainstream vendors are waiting for. An HD card on the market today has to be labeled as an "early adopter" model.

      On the other hand, maybe this is a technology that you want to be an early adopter of to avoid cards that end up getting crippled by "broadcast flag" laws.

    2. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a handful of HDTV cards out there, I saw ATI's HDTV-Wonder in action and it looked alright. I'm not recommending ATi, they make complete dogshit these days - so if their product seems to perform acceptably, the competition must really kick ass.

      The problem with trying to build an HTPC with HDTV powers, as I see it, is getting component output to the TV, or finding a TV with RGBS input (VGA plugs like your monitor). Scan converters from VGAHDTV are expensive and the picutre looks like ass.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      Obviously, hardware encoding and picture quality is key...

      Um, No.

      HDTV is a digital signal, all you need to do is record that signal to the hard drive.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    4. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got two such cards, one is Linux only and the other is Windows only. But since they both save the raw bitstream coming from over the air, files can be played back from both cards without modification.

      They're in separate systems and have access via NFS and SMB to a RAID array to save/playback all programming.

    5. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can you give us your thoughts on both of the cards and how well they work?

    6. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by SlashMaster · · Score: 1
      My home theatre research webpage might be of value here (sorry, temporarily down today yet due to ISP changing IP :(

      http://timschoenfelder.com/htpc.htmltimschoenfelde r.com/htpc.html

      Its a collection of links to howtos, forums, and software(windows/linux/xbox/etc OSs) for anyone interested in building a home theatre PC.

    7. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by GoRK · · Score: 2, Informative

      HDTV output to a PC is really quite easy if you simply make it a requirement when you are shopping for your TV. Tons of tv's have DVI-D inputs or RGBS on them, and they really arent more expensive than the tv's that don't. Just get one of these, and then, with some tweaking, pretty much any modern video card can be made to drive them. Apps such as powerstrip, et. al. make this pretty simple.

    8. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Informative

      Both cards work admirably at tuning ATSC signals, capturing the bitstream, and saving them to disk.

      For playback, the MyHD card includes an MPEG decoder and component, VGA, and DVI output (as an option), so your PC can plug right into your HDTV. It can playback to a PC monitor, too. The driver and application are pretty well polished and easy to use. It comes with an I/R remote and a remote sensor that plugs into a serial port so you can keep your PC and keyboard hidden away and control card functions from the remote. It will also playback DVDs as well as DVD content ripped to hard disk.

      The The pcHDTV card relies on software applications (Xine) to decode and playback. The driver is enormously stable in my experience. Playing back content relies on correct configuration of Xine, the mpeg decoder, the program stream demultiplexor, and so forth. Not too hard for more experienced users.

      In my setup there's a Linux box that's responsible for recording only and a Windows box for playback only.

    9. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      What about 64 bit and/or 66MHz PCI? That's available on many machines today. In fact I have two machines with 64 bit PCI in my house, and they're both PCs. My Yosemite Rev 1 G3 had both 64 bit and 66MHz, but not in the same slot.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by cft_128 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Their disadvantage is that HDTV can be quite the high-bandwidth application, and that means the limitations of the PCI bus, and even the AGP connection can sometimes cause quality loss.

      Uncompressed HDTV could cause those problems sure, but compressed streams (what you would be recording) are about 19.2Mb/s, a far cry from the theoretical cap of PCI. The AGP slot should be able to handle the uncompressed stream fine for display, after all it is only 1280x720 @ 60hz or 1920x1080 @ 30hz (or rather 1920x540@60hz) and most graphics card can exceed that by quite a bit (right now I'm at 1600x1200 @ 85hz on an old laptop).

      --

      Underloved Movies and Pub Quiz: donotquestionme.org

    11. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by Chris+Carollo · · Score: 3, Informative
      Their disadvantage is that HDTV can be quite the high-bandwidth application, and that means the limitations of the PCI bus, and even the AGP connection can sometimes cause quality loss.
      Not that I've ever experienced and I've been using a HiPix for years. HD isn't that high-bandwidth...it's only 19.2Mb/s, or 2.4MB/s. The standard 33Mhz PCI bus spec is for 133MB/s so there's plenty of headroom there.

      Far more of a concern is how fast you can write those bits to disk, though even there I've never had a problem.
    12. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by Frac · · Score: 1

      *smacks my forehead*

      You're right.

    13. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by bobwoodard · · Score: 1

      The ATIWonder HDTV is ok. I love watching it (after the pain of installation & configuration), but the software you use to control it (ATI MMC) is absolutely horrible.

    14. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by afidel · · Score: 1

      The potential problem is an AGP all in one card. Some (most) AGP implementations have horrific bandwidth from the card to the host so getting a reliable moderate speed connection over AGP might be a problem. Of course even 32bit-33MHz PCI is orders of magnitude faster than compressed HDTV as are modern HDD's.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    15. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      The state of HDTV capture cards for the PC looks, cloudy and buggy =)

      There's a few models out there (ATI HDTV wonder for example) but most of them just do OTA DTV ATSC stuff ( just when you thought I couldn't add in another acronym...) There's Fusion III card that was recently featured on /. that does unencrypted QAM for getting the HDTV off of *some* cable company's...

      So you're stuck with either broadcast OTA DTV, a card that may or may not work depending on whether or not your cable company scrambles/encrypts their QAM, or cobbling together some sort of firewire type connection between your HDTV digital cable box and your PC (and as you read in the article their crippling those connections now, and next July all boxes will be hosed with broadcast flag )

      I think our only hope is a CableCard compatible PCI tuner card. You could legally/legitimately "tune" HDTV digital cable right into your PC (hypothetically).

      *shrug* that's my take anyways... I could be full malarcky =)

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    16. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      bah i dorked the EFF link

      broadcastflag not flat

      also toms hardware review of ATI HDTV wonder might be of interest...

      e.

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    17. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by BillyBlaze · · Score: 1

      Can the pcHDTV capture non-HDTV (broadcast or cable NTSC) signals also?

    18. Re:What about PC-based HDTV recorders? by connorbd · · Score: 1

      To put it in perspective, consider that a FireWire connection is capable of 400Mbps, and MiniDV data streams operate a hair under 30Mbps (25Mbps for the video stream with standard 5:1 compression, the rest a PCM audio stream). Most computers less than six or seven years old can handle that on the PCI bus, and a broadcast HDTV signal (or, if you're doing production on a JVC GR-HD1, HDV data stream) is only 2/3 as wide. And you get better color sampling to boot.

  2. DirecTV really needs to get with it. by ARRRLovin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The current crop of Standalone Tivo's blow the DirecTiVo away performance wise. The features of the DirecTiVo's can't be beat, but those that are used to the standard Series2 TiVo (or even the Series1) are growing tired of the dismal menu performance of the DirecTivo. All of this can be solved quite easily.......in software. Update those TiVo's DirecTV!

    --
    -Randy
    1. Re:DirecTV really needs to get with it. by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Informative

      A codebase split seems to have happened when the DirecTiVo units officially took on the name of "DirecTV DVR with TiVo service" and the monthly subscription price got halved from $9.95 to $4.95. Near that time, the fees for standalone TiVos moved upwards from $9.95 to $12.95...

      And at that point the DirecTV code froze, while development for the standalone TiVos continued. Apparently, DirecTV now must pay for any new features they want added to the DirecTV DVRs, meanwhile TiVo continued to push its latest stuff out for free to their direct subscribers. All of the things that a standard Series 2 TiVo can do that a Series 2 DirecTV DVR cannot were added after that point in time.

    2. Re:DirecTV really needs to get with it. by arazor · · Score: 1, Informative

      FYI the series 2 DirecTivo's maybe even the HD ones Im not sure about that part can be "hacked" to run the newer Tivo software and other coolness. Just google to find the relavent instructions. of course doing all that voids warrantee etc...

    3. Re:DirecTV really needs to get with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting theory. Makes a certain amount of sense and could be why DirecTV is going to be rolling their own Tivo-like device in the future...

    4. Re:DirecTV really needs to get with it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not all the new features work, HMO in particular. It is worth doing just for folders though.

    5. Re:DirecTV really needs to get with it. by RedX · · Score: 1

      HMO functionality can be added to the DirecTiVo with 4.0 via the HMO superpatch, check the TiVo forums over at www.dealdatabase.com for details

  3. What about the SA8000HD by Blahzay · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Didn't the title say the review was of ALL the HD recorders available? The Scientific Atlanta 8000HD may not be the best, but it certainly works.

    1. Re:What about the SA8000HD by Matrix_X · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just got the SA8000HD box about a week ago. It's better than I thought but still has many glitches. 32megs of ram/16 video ram doesn't seem like enough, especially when it has a hard time keeping up with the HD streams that come in from Time Warner Cable.

      But, I have to say, it's nice to be able to record HD shows and the technology is only going to get better.

      Oh, and 5 bucks a month for the box isn't too bad either...... considering DirectTivo is around 1000.

    2. Re:What about the SA8000HD by Mondoz · · Score: 3, Informative

      After having a Tivo for the past year, using this box feels like being stabbed in the face...

      You can't search for shows very easily, if at all...
      The series subscription interface is horribly featureless...
      It doesn't give a darn about what you like, and certainly won't offer any suggestions of what you might like.

      Configuration menus are strewn about several different sections, accessable from lots of specalized buttons. TiVo's interface and menus are like a massage by comparison.

      If only the Tivo would record HD from cable.

      I do like having the cable box, HD convertor, and DVR in one single box, though.

      But for the time being, I'm going to let TiVo record to its heart's content.
      IMO, nothing will ever surpass TiVo in perfection of interface...
      TiVo 4 evar!!!

      --
      /sig
    3. Re:What about the SA8000HD by Gondola · · Score: 1

      I've got a TiVo sitting unused and gathering dust since my conversion to HDTV. I just can't bear to watch SD programming on my 65" HDTV.

      Now with that said, the SA8000HD isn't too bad on its own, but as the poster said, after using a TiVo, it's not quite stabbing yourself in the face; more like a little blunt trauma every time you try to search for a show, or wonder what your TiVo would have recorded based on your previous recordings.

      I'd buy a $500 TiVo with support for HDTV.
      $600 if it included wireless network access so it would hook up to my LAN.
      $700 if it included a DVD burner.
      $800 if it had a digital cable tuner compatible with my provider.

      I hate wading through programming, and I don't want to run wires all over. I'll pay to avoid that hassle.

      My time is worth a lot to me, and considering I only watch maybe 30-60 minutes of television a day (Jeopardy, or an installment of some serial like Alias on DVD), wading through a programming list for an HOUR every week because the interface sucks is very irritating to me.

      But, in two years, these things will exist. I won't pay that much then. I'll just be missing out on some potentially good television programming until then.

  4. is anyone really surprised at this format war? by CheechBG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have never seen D-VHS, but I can only imagine that since it is tape, that it has the same fundamental flaws as VHS, the magnetic tape. I don't care if it is digital, if I put my copy of Fear and Loathing in there and play it over and over I can only surmise that it's going to degrade as the heads go over and over the tape. IMHO, Blu-ray is a much more reliable (in comparison, I know) format.

    1. Re:is anyone really surprised at this format war? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      It may have the same flaws, but it also has the same benefits. That is, magnetic heads are cheaper than laser optics.

      The main unit itself should be cheaper than a TiVo or BluRay recorder. Just like a VCR is worth about half what a DVD player is today.

      Some people don't worry about degradation of the tapes, like me. I don't put in a copy of Fear and Loathing to play over and over. I watch a movie once, and then I've seen it.

      BTW, this is different than VHS. It's stored digitally (well so is VHS) but with ECC style error correction, just like a DVD. So the tape can degrade quite a bit before it affects the contents.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:is anyone really surprised at this format war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen D-VHS in person, on a Samsung DLP screen. It was AMAZING. Far beyond anything I've seen with DVDs. Amazing to the point that there are some people who you don't want to see in that fine of detail. :)

      It really is too bad it's still a magnetic tape, though.

    3. Re:is anyone really surprised at this format war? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      DVHS is an awesome archival format. Any DVHS player you buy has an extremely high quality ADC so you can record hours of old VHS tapes onto DVHS-about 9 hours per DVHS at virtually indistinguishable from source copy.

      Also, you can go to 169time to get an STB with HD-firewire out. Expensive, but not copyright-crippled at all...not too shabby!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    4. Re:is anyone really surprised at this format war? by unitron · · Score: 1
      "It's stored digitally (well so is VHS)..."

      VHS tape is analog.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  5. You can record HDTV content on a current Tivo by SensitiveMale · · Score: 3, Informative

    I do it all the time.

    Now you do lose the enhanced resolution BUT it does record in widescreen format which is nice for movies over cable.

    1. Re:You can record HDTV content on a current Tivo by AGTiny · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, and you can record normal TV in black and white, but why would you want to? :)

    2. Re:You can record HDTV content on a current Tivo by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      Right, and you can record normal TV in black and white, but why would you want to? :)

      How can I record my TV shows in black & white?

      I know you are kidding, but my point is that current Tivos will record HDTV in widescreen format. Sure not at the native resolution, but still it is nice until I can drop a grand for an HDTV tivo.

    3. Re:You can record HDTV content on a current Tivo by connorbd · · Score: 1

      Of course you do. You also lose tons of resolution when you record SDTV onto VHS -- it's nothing new. Even the best MiniDV or Betacam signal is going to look like crap on VHS compared to the original.

  6. FireWire by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

    FireWire wasn't a stupid decision...it was 5C-protected (copy-protected) FireWire that was a stupid decision.

    FireWire was probably the best promise of device interconnectivity to ever exist in recent years. But it has been crippled by several things:

    1. Content providers/TV/movie/Hollywood's deathly fear of being able to easily interconnect all devices, including computing equipment, via one perfect, digital connection.

    2. A bit due to Apple's early ridiculous licensing and logo requirements to use the "FireWire" name. FireWire is the name that would have taken IEEE-1394 the furthest, but thanks to the early bungling, we're now stuck with "FireWire", "DV", "i.Link", "IEEE-1394", "1394"...what's that sir? Oh, yes, they're all really the same thing.

    Imagine having ALL of your entertainment equipment, including your computer, connected digitally via one, simple FireWire cable each, all daisy-chained off one another. All able to control one another when necessary, sending meta-data and device control commands, as well as audio, video, and other data over the wire. No ridiculous bundles of cabling. Everything plug and play. Everything "just works". Even Wireless FireWire (yes, there's a spec). (And yes, FireWire has the bandwidth necessary to handle all this and more.)

    That was the promise of FireWire. Instead, we're stuck with final output formats like DVI, and HDCP-protected HDMI, 5C FireWire that virtually nothing supports, and the coming Broadcast Flag.

    Oh well. :-(

    1. Re:FireWire by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      For some reason my cable company runs everything unencrypted. I can pull anything off firewire, including HBO-HD, etc. I wish my cable box supported playback of external TS files, but I know that will never happen. :)

    2. Re:FireWire by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
      Imagine having ALL of your entertainment equipment, including your computer, connected digitally via one, simple FireWire cable each, all daisy-chained off one another.

      Now imagine buying a $40 repeater for every 15 feet of cable...

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
    3. Re:FireWire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make sure your devices are chained 14.99 feet apart.

    4. Re:FireWire by operagost · · Score: 1

      I like to put my DVD player 20 feet away from my TV, don't you?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:FireWire by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

      No, but I do like having my computer more than 15 feet away from my TV.

      --
      I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  7. Only copy protected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The DTheater has encrypyted tapes that can only be played on DTheater (the copy protection) compatible VCRs.

    I can record lots of open signals over the Firewire. The lower end one can be found for around $300, but the newer and more expensive ones are made a lot better.

  8. Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by AGTiny · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have a Motorola DCT-6208, the model I think they are referring to in this article that Comcast offers.

    Even though the hard drive is only 80GB, and the interface sucks, the thing is virtually free and I don't have to worry about it breaking, hard drive failing, or the eventual obsolescence in less than a year. Anyone shelling out $1000 for the satellite models is a sucker IMO.

    I used to be a DirecTV customer and bought a RCA DTC-100 HD tuner on Ebay for $400. I was able to turn around and resell it on Ebay for $350 2 years later, but only because I sold it before the crop of DVRs came out, and because it was a high-demand model. Now, if you are stuck with an obsolete HD Tivo in a year or two, you are pretty much screwed because the new models will be so much better no one will want an older model. Maybe you can sell it to your grandmother though for $100. :)

    With cable though, I can keep getting a better box for virtually nothing. The new Motorola DCT-6412 with two tuners and 120GB hard drive is right around the corner, and I will just have to call and setup an appointment to have the tech come in and swap it out.

    1. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      Another thing, the interface problems on the Motorola boxes are all because most cable companies are stuck using the TV Guide/Gemstar software, which is the horrible boxy ad-ridden mess you are used to. My cable company, Armstrong, is stuck contractually with TV Guide for the near future, but would love to move to something else.

      However, the DCT cable boxes are generic platforms and can run any software. Some markets are now using the much nicer Pioneer Passport Echo software, which I think is much closer to Tivo-land, since you can record entire series with one click, it shows the buffer status, etc. Microsoft also has software for the box in some markets.

    2. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by digerata · · Score: 1
      anyone shelling out $1000 for the satellite models is a sucker IMO.

      As stated in the article, if you go with Dish Network, you can do the same as cable and rent the device.

      --

      1;
    3. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      The current round of standard DirecTV TiVos are the same box that a year ago were selling at $299 now selling for $99. The $200 price drop is being funded entirely by DirecTV who assumes that they'll make the money back over the long term out of service subscriptions, and that's why the retailers require that some service be on the box for twelve months or otherwise you owe the retailer the subsidy money they don't get.

    4. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by syates21 · · Score: 1

      Riiiiiight, the HD Tivo owners will be out of luck, except they will have had the best HD recording product available for a couple of years, which will still be working fine (what the HD standard is going to change soon, I think not).

      On the other hand, cable owners will get whatever the low-bid hardware vendor was at the time.

      To each his own.

    5. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      Yeah but consider the market for the current HDTivos: the early adopter/HD nut/AVS Forum/type person. These people are not content with old technology and are always looking to upgrade. What will they do with their obsolete boxes?

    6. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      No it's not, they corrected the article:


      A review of high-definition television recording options in the Aug. 29 Business section incorrectly said that Dish Network's Dish Player-DVR 921 digital video recorder is available for rental. It is available for purchase, and the price is $999.

    7. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by Trepidati0n · · Score: 1

      In my area (Rockford, IL), if you call the "cable company" and say you will come and pick it up (the new box that is)...they will usually give you a month for free for saving them the tech time. It never hurts to ask.

    8. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by vondo · · Score: 1
      Couldn't agree more. I have the 6208 too. Sure, it's not so great compared to my friends (non-HD) DirectTivo. But if I move in a year and don't get a house/apartment with the correct south facing area, etc., I'm out nothing.

      Actually, the $10 they quote is somewhat inaccurate. The price to get HD and DVR is just $10 more than regular cable, probably just $5 above Digital Cable and $5 above regular HD service (which is what I had before).

      $5 extra/month vs. $1000 up front is a no brainer.

      Will have to look at Dish when I move, though.

    9. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      there's some merit to that, however...

      You don't sound like someone who has gone through the pain of re-entering in all there preferences, season passes, etc... on the new box. Speak nothing of shows that you "archived" on the old box, or haven't had a chance to view before the changeover... which is the sucky part.

      Another angle is that if I buy a box, i can, within reason (and the DMCA, blah blah blah) modify/hack it... I'm pretty sure the cable company will frown upon the same behavior with their box, and will be curious as to why the box has been opened =)

      eh...

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    10. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by AGTiny · · Score: 1

      Hehe, on this box you basically have to re-enter all your recordings every season anyway, or when things get screwed up, so it's not a big deal. I'm glad I have never used a Tivo... my opinion might be different in that case.

      When switchover time comes, if there is something I haven't watched yet, I can always archive it over firewire to PC and watch it later (on the PC). My HTPC isn't fast enough to play HD, and it's only hooked up to the TV at 848x480p anyway. What would be cool is a way to hook up 2 DVR boxes with firewire and copy all the programs from the old box to the new box!

    11. Re:Don't buy a DVR, rent it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can keep getting a better box for virtually nothing.

      Ummm, there are no free lunches. You are paying for the turners through your normal monthly charges. You are actually renting it even if you don't think so. The rent vs. buy choice is yours, but don't think hardware is magically free.

  9. In other TiVo news by spudchucker · · Score: 0

    Looks like NetFlix, TiVo, and Time Warner are working on video on demand. http://news.zdnet.com/2100-3513_22-5376581.html -S

  10. Bad Moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when is a link to another article a troll?

  11. DirecTivo by natron+2.0 · · Score: 1

    I have been happy with my DirecTV Tivo (series 2) since I purchased it a year ago. I am still waiting for the price drop on the DirecTV HD models though, but I cannot wait to put my HDTV to the test!

  12. Re:some more gmail invites for you all by frisbeeforfido · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look at the actual URL, not the one displayed.

    --
    "If it wasn't for my horse, I wouldn't have spent that year in college."
    -Lewis Black
  13. TROLL! NFSW BROWSER POPUPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do not click this link at any costs! It contains some kind of browser hijacking script that pops up like hundreds of goatse/tubgirl/etc popups and basically keeps you from closing it.

    We need to find out who keeps posting this crap and turn him in to the feds.. this has to be illegal..

  14. Soon to be illegal ... by YetAnotherName · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh and don't forget that current HDTV capture cards will be illegal on 2005.7.1. Buy 'em now while you can. Future models will have to support DRM via a broadcast flag. :-(

    1. Re:Soon to be illegal ... by yeremein · · Score: 2, Funny

      Future models will have to support DRM via a broadcast flag. :-(

      Hopefully the broadcast flag will prove every bit as effective as CSS.

    2. Re:Soon to be illegal ... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I hope I'm not the only one who sees the irony in digital rights erosion kicking in for americans on their independence day.

    3. Re:Soon to be illegal ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be the only one who sees our independence day on the 1st instead of the 4th.

  15. FireWire products by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I forgot to mention...there ARE quite a few products that do contain FireWire: HDTVs, set top boxes, DVD players, digital VCRs, A/V receivers, etc:

    http://www.1394ta.org/About/products/consumer_prod ucts.html

    Additionally, the FCC is mandating that as of July 1, 2005, all digital cable set top boxes MUST include a functional FireWire port, and as of April 1, 2004, must provide a set top box with a working FireWire port on customer request. Of course, this doesn't help if content providers choose to encrypt the content.

    Here's hoping we can fight the Broadcast Flag. Unfortunately, I can see a future where our kids think that the only way they can watch what they want to watch, when they want to watch it, and on the device they wish to watch it on, is by illegally downloading it from a P2P network, instead of being able to legally record it and move it around THEMSELVES with equipment THEY BOUGHT from a service THEY PAY FOR in their OWN HOMES.

    1. Re:FireWire products by mark0 · · Score: 1

      I looked in the PDF to which you linked. Where does it mention FireWire or 1394? A search turned up nothing...

    2. Re:FireWire products by daveschroeder · · Score: 1
      From page 50:

      (4) Cable operators shall:

      (i) Effective April 1, 2004, upon request of a customer, replace any leased high definition set-top box, which does not include a functional IEEE 1394 interface, with one that includes a functional IEEE 1394 interface or upgrade the customer's set-top box by download or other means to ensure that the IEEE 1394 interface is functional.

      (ii) Effective July 1, 2005, include both a DVI or HDMI interface and an IEEE 1394 interface on all high definition set-top boxes acquired by a cable operator for distribution to customers.

      The actual "law" is Section 304 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, but the above FCC rule action 03-225 is the actual practical interpretation of that section.

    3. Re:FireWire products by mark0 · · Score: 1

      Interesting... now Acrobat finds 25 instances. Geesh. Thanks

  16. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by smackjer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get the lifetime subscription. It's worth it, and you can think of it as part of the hardware cost. Plus, if you decide to sell your box you can expect to recoup the lifetime subscription cost as it transfers with the box.

    As far as "phoning home", how else could it get the program listings and software upgrades? Tivo Series 2 supports broadband, if access to a landline is an issue.

    I have yet to meet a Tivo user who isn't happy they bought a Tivo.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  17. DirecTV HD Tivo HR10-250 by arazor · · Score: 3, Informative

    I agree that the Tivo has the best interface and general coolness. But be aware that there is a very good chance that the HDMI port will not work at all or has to be messed with and even thats not 100%. If you dont believe just check the tivo community forums about this unit http://www.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.ph p?s=f81a3d87b7dcd78fda0257b6df286bc6&threadid=1832 03

    That said if you do not plan to use the HDMI port by all means get one immediately DirecTV has several HD promotions going on right now and has plans to add a lot of HD programming in 2005 and 2006.

  18. I have the HD Tivo by mp3zero · · Score: 5, Informative

    I know some (read most) people will think I am crazy but I recently purchased the DirecTV HD Tivo. I have had the unit for just over a week now and absolutely love it.

    The price: 999.00 (ouch, don't tell my wife)

    I have had DirecTV HDTV for about 6 months and really hated not being able to record the shows I like to watch. I found myself using my hacked/upgraded tivo (series 1 non-hd) to watch shows that also are aired in HD simply because I like skipping commercials.

    The quality of recorded shows are simply amazing. Especially Disovery HD and movies on HBO-HD. Very nice sound as it keeps the DD 5.1 soundtrack.

    Was it worth the 1000.00 I paid for it? Well, I priced out building a similar HTPC (Home theater PC) with 2 HD tuners and 2 OTA tuners and it was more expensive to roll my own. Also, mythTV does not worth well with direct (from what I have read). So I do believe it was worth the 1000.00 considering it does come with a 250gb hard drive (150.00). :) I know I know I know.. justify myself all the way to hell.

    1. Re:I have the HD Tivo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry my friend, you'll read something about your tivo in 3 months that allows you to access a bash prompt and all the sudden you can justify your leet purchase. I'm in the same boat but I dont want to admit that buying a piece of over the shelf hardware could be better than rolling my own.

    2. Re:I have the HD Tivo by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      I had a borrowed 57" HD TV for about 6 months while a friend was out of town. I upgraded my cable box to HD (It was no additional cost) and kept my series 1 tivo.

      I never watched HD, the Tivo was the only way to watch things. I later got the HD DVR my cable company offered for $10/mo (same as SD, just had to tell them you had an HD TV), but it sucked in comparison. I was willing to make the trade (HD Tivo wasn't out yet), but the wife wasn't.

      I have since moved back to SD, but I got an DirecTivo for $79 and dumped cable.

      If I had the money, I would by the HD TiVo in a heartbeat.

  19. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1, Troll
    Congratulations. You have just convinced me to roll my own PVR instead of buying a TiVo. I had forgotten that it contacts the mothership for listings and may upload my viewing choices. While I don't think they're selling that information yet, I have no reason to trust that they won't ever sell that information.

    Could somebody point me to a homebrew PVR tutorial?

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  20. Re:Over The Air vs Cable/Satellite by chill · · Score: 1

    Most, if not ALL HDTV recorders for PCs support only over-the-air broadcasts, and not QAM encoded. Cable and Satellite use QAM encoding, meaning you aren't going to record unless you have an antenna.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  21. Not a stupid decision - an economic decision by GoRK · · Score: 4, Informative

    What the article does not tell you is that the decision to include anything OTHER than a firewire input to the D-VHS VCR would have also required a REALTIME HDTV MPEG2 encoder in the VCR. By "the most popular 3 hdtv interconnects" they are probably talking about Component YUV, Component RGB, and DVI-D -- while these are indeed the most popular interconnects, they transport the already uncompressed video stream. To record them in DVHS format you'd have to recompress the video back to MPEG2, and remux the audio (and ensure sync). This alone would have sent the price of the unit skyrocketing. In addition the decision was not stupid, because as of April 1, 2004, cable companies are required to have the firewire transports on their devices, meaning that the decision for a firewire-only vcr would be fairly standards compliant as well as inexpensive.

    The nice thing about firewire transporting this is that the video arrives preencoded in a nice transport stream in full quality. The not-nice thing about it is that the FCC is also allowing the firewire to be C5 encrypted. I really really hope someone is working on breaking this one.

    1. Re:Not a stupid decision - an economic decision by TheSync · · Score: 2, Informative

      The real-time HD encoders used in the broadcast world cost around $50,000. It is a tough job to squish 1.2 Gbps down to under 20 Mbps and make it look good.

      Even the lamest quality HD MPEG-2 encoders on the HDV prosumer camcorders are at least several hundred dollars.

    2. Re:Not a stupid decision - an economic decision by CityZen · · Score: 1

      The other "most popular" HDTV interconnect is a coaxial cable carrying ATSC encoded & modulated HDTV.

      How soon until ATSC modulators become cheap? We need a box with firewire in, coax out (with an additional coax in to let you combine multiple channels onto the same cable).

    3. Re:Not a stupid decision - an economic decision by jmac880n · · Score: 1

      We need a box with firewire in, coax out

      Not quite what you are asking for, but have you seen the Canopus ADVC-100? This handy device will convert (DVD-quality) video (not RF) to/from DV-encoded firewire.

      Great stuff...

  22. Re:DirecTV HD Tivo HR10-250 by arazor · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention that I am on my 5th DirecTV HD tivo replacment so I am also speaking from personal experience. Im going to keep getting them to send replacements until I get a working one. For a $1000 piece of equipment you would think they would of done more testing oh well...
    This is the TV I am using these units with in case anyone is wondering
    Toshiba 46H84

  23. Imagine having ALL of your entertainment equipment by way2trivial · · Score: 1
    Passing virus originated instructions from one another

    your computer telling your tivo to erase it's entire harddrive, then record anime manga 3 at two am, because that's what the virus writer thinks you should watch, your vcr ejecting tapes, and your cd jukebox player snapping cd's in half by partilly loading them and then rotating..

    yes, the joys of a massively inter-connected motorized hardware would be ever so much more fun than a purely electronic non-motorized one..

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  24. HDTV - PVR / DVR under $200 by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have HDTV and I am with Dishnetwork. There is a cheaper option to record programs and to receive HD tv. It would cost you under $200 to view HD and to record with the ability to record SD signals (There are only like 6 channels in HD anyways). The HD recievers are now on promotion (DirectTv and Dishnetwork). If you can get a 1 year contract, you can get the receiver around $80. Then you buy a modified Tivo box (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ite m=5721787901&fromMakeTrack=true) which will run you around $100. The Tivo box you can send the recorded stuff onto a computer for later viewing. Best of all, no monthly fees ever once you buy this unit. Let me know what others think. No this is not my auction.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  25. Grid-view program schedule pauses nothing new by mark0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I get the same thing with my Series 2 TiVo right now. The simply listing is pretty fast, but the grid view fills in like Tetris on level 1...

  26. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, I don't need program listings, and why the hell should it require software upgrades? It's linux based, right?

    I just want a box I can hit record on. I don't watch that much TV, I don't need it to recommmend shows to me.

    Hell, I hardly need that. Everything on cable is repeated on a 4 hour loop. Miss tonights South Park? Don't worry, it'll be on again in another hour or so.

    They're trying to sell me more than I need, and I'm not buying.

    I just want a box that records video digitally, and allows me to archive it somehow, whether it's an ethernet port or DVD-R. And, I want to buy it for under 100 bucks with NO STRINGS ATTACHED.

    I have yet to meet a Tivo user who isn't happy they bought a Tivo.

    And I haven't met an iPod owner who doesn't think the scroll wheel is anything less than mankinds greatest technological achievement.

    But I don't want or need an iPod either since a 20 dollar MP3 CD player does all I require.

    I've never met a Harley Davidson owner who thinks that his bike is anything less than the greatest vehicle ever built. Fact is, from a purely technical/mechanical viewpoint, Harleys are tempermental piles of shit that are broken most of the time. But it's a status symbol.

    iPod, TiVo, Harleys, Abercrombie and Fitch shirts. I don't need any of 'em.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  27. Re:Over The Air vs Cable/Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Satellite, at least DirecTV, does not use QAM.

  28. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by evilmousse · · Score: 1


    um, i'll volunteer my viewing habits
    if it helps keep shows like futurama...

    -g

    doncha wanna be a neilson family anyway?

  29. Except... by daveschroeder · · Score: 1
    ...that in most cases, all of the equipment you'll be connecting will be in one place - presumably, your entertainment center.

    And EACH cable can be up to 4.5m (15 ft) long. Most of your cables needn't be longer than 15 inches, much less 15 feet.

    Also, IEEE-1394b supports up to 3.2Gbps up to 100m (328 ft) over fiber.

    To say nothing of Wireless FireWire...

    1. Re:Except... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      This comment isn't to knock you down or anything, but you REALLY do like Firewire don't you? I do as well btw and agree with what you say.

  30. HD Tivo by apoplectic · · Score: 1

    Despite the rash of problems reported with the HDMI port and the occasionally slow guide rendering, this machine is well worth the price. After recording Ice Age as my first HD show and watching it later at my own leisure...the experience is so fantastic that I feel as though I've practically stolen something. Great stuff!

  31. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by telstar · · Score: 1
    "While I don't think they're selling that information yet, I have no reason to trust that they won't ever sell that information.
    • TiVo has never hidden the fact that they collect and sell aggregated information. Guess what? The shows you watch and like may stay on the air 'cause TiVo reported that people watched it!

  32. SA8000HD by NetJunkie · · Score: 1

    I have the Scientific Atlanta 8000HD from Time Warner. I believe that is the Comcast box they review, but ours doesn't have any ads nor any of the issues they mention. It doesn't have as good of an interface as Tivo, but it does the job. Two tuners, HD, PIP, nice.

  33. Dish Network Mistakes by futuresheep · · Score: 1
    The only leaseable HD reciever from Dish is the 811, which is NOT a DVR. It's cost is $5.00/month. If that's just changed, then oops.

    Firewire will never be enabled on the Dish 921 HD DVR.

  34. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by Helios1182 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out http://www.mythtv.org/. They have some links to how to setup a MythTv.

  35. Re:Where is this wording? by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1
    RTFA. It's on the second page.


    The D-VHS's biggest failing, though, was that it couldn't record in HD from most digital video recorders, thanks to JVC's spectacularly stupid decision to leave out the three most common high-def video inputs in favor of a digital FireWire connector with built-in copy-control circuitry; only a handful of other devices support this. (Comcast's recorder is one; see Jim Hawk's article on Page F1 for details.)


  36. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

    BUt is my name attached to that? I don't want that, and I can't trust TiVo *not* to sell my name. What's next, spam trying to sell me DVD box sets?

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  37. Making your own HD-PVR using firewire by mmmbeer · · Score: 3, Informative

    I recently had quite a struggle getting a cable box with a 1394 port on it from my local cable co (BrightHouse Tampa). I had dreams of a pure digital connection from the tuner to the computer, right to file or to my XvMC X session. After finally getting it and connecting it to my computer, and writing a a good chunk of code to get it to talk through the firewire card in my linux box... every channel is either analog or 5C.

    Most the channels here in Tampa are analog and there is no MPEG encoder chip on the Scientific Atlanta 3250HD box, so that means nothing comes out of the firewire port for those channels. The rest of the channels are encrypted and flagged as CCI "once", meaning that only hardware that supports 5C can read it and that hardware must respect the "copy only once" intent of the flag. As far as I know, there is no way to decrypt 5C content in software, which leaves the user with unusable transport streams.

    I'd still love to work on a pure digital PVR (one that doesn't make several analog->digital->analog->etc convertsions once the signal gets to the box), but firewire definately doesn't further that cause.

  38. neat.. but whats the point :/ by bmajik · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been a long time DirecTV customer but i just cancelled last week.

    I have a Hughes HDVR2 Series2 DirecTivo. It was cool and all, but what I really wanted was a way to get content off of it and watch it on a computer. No home media option for DirecTivo users though. Nice.

    The real reason we axed DirecTV (and have not replaced it, nor do we plan to) is that the content just isn't there compared with the price you pay for it.

    My big interests are F1 racing and World Rally. Speedchannel's coverage of same amounts to under 10 hours a month, tops. Sure, there is other stuff i _can_ watch (cartoon network, for instance) but i could take or leave it. One issue i find with a tivo is that i have all this stuff in there that i feel obligated to watch because its there and i enjoy watching it...

    My wife on the other hand is a minnesota twins fanatic. Yet there wer eless than 5 games available to us, even though we live within 3 hrs of minneapolis and have the local tv pack. The MLB extra innings deal is like $70 or $80 or something silly, and you cant ever get a straight answer on what will or wont be shown because of the ridiculous blackout and regional rights issues related to TV.

    So I was basically paying for a few races a month and then some time sucking.

    My wife was getting no twins games, but a whole boatload of junk off of TLC that managed to suck her day away. It would start innocently enough - "oh, i'll just watch an episode of blah while i do this chore" and then shes managed to waste the whole afternoon watching crap that isn't even all that interesting.

    So $45/mo for a bit of racing and a whole bunch of time wasting didn't seem like a good deal to us anymore.

    HD seems like an even worse deal. Where's the HD content ? The devices for doing HD PVR are "cool" (although i think any directivo solution will still have the lack of home-media i cited above) but you're talking like $60+ /mo for television and it seems like there's honestly nothing that enriching to watch. Seems like a better way to spend $60 a month is to use half of it to take your significant other out to some cheap resturant, and then donate the rest to a local organization.

    IMO, alot of whats coming right now is technology for technologies sake. I admit that i am captivated by the appeal of a distributed mythTV setup with FEs all over the house, but really, i shouldn't be watching enough tv to justify that.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by futuresheep · · Score: 1
      HD seems like an even worse deal. Where's the HD content ? The devices for doing HD PVR are "cool" (although i think any directivo solution will still have the lack of home-media i cited above) but you're talking like $60+ /mo for television and it seems like there's honestly nothing that enriching to watch

      There's plenty of HD content, most of it OTA, and especially sports, I watch Sunday NFL in HD now, Monday Night Football is stunning, as was the US Open. Most of my local news programs are in HD. Tonight I get to choose between Lost, Hawaii, and Law and Order. PBS has amazing stuff on their HD broadcast as well. Tomorrow I get CSI and ER if I want. Saturday, ABC will be showing an HD fees of Castaway. Fun! Tom Hanks gets skinnier in 1080i! This is all over the air. I don't pay the cable company, or a satellite provider extra for any of these channels. As long as you have a good antennae, an HDTV, and an HD tuner, you're set.

    2. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the HD coverage of the US Open was really great. I especially like how it switched to SD for the entire second set of the men's final. Thanks a lot, CBS.

      I agree with the upthread, and I'm about ready to cancel my Comcast service. All I watch is 1 hour of TV on HBO every Sunday, maybe one college football game, if a good team is on and in HD (otherwise I prefer the radio broadcasts), and if I'm feeling particularly unambitious, reruns of Law & Order. Hardly worth the $80/month it's costing me.

      Also the CompressCast image quality tends to be terrible. HBO usually looks good, and the other HD channels look okay, but the Olympics coverage was compressed to an unrecognizable tile mosaic, and the remainder of the 700+ standard-def channels are all squeezed into what appears to be about 100kHz of bandwidth. They just look horrible.

    3. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by ckelly5 · · Score: 1

      Frankly, i don't understand. You get no twins games, but you're in the local market, correct? Where are the twins games being broadcast then? As you are in that local market (supposedly), you should get the local channels, which should have some games, and you should also get the Regional Sports Network for that area. Again, if it's not on the local channels, and not on the regional sports network (or blacked out), odds are no one else in the local area, sat or not, are getting these games. can't fault DTV for that.

      in regards to the home media option, yes this is a sore spot. I will admit that i would love to have this feature, but then again, no other sat/ cable providers offer this, with the exception of a few small beta tests (mostly in California) for Digeo's Moxi platform.

      As for the HD content, sorry to hear you jumped off the dtv wagon. Bravo HD was added about a week ago, and word on the street is that TNT-HD, and inHD1 and 2 (HD PPV) will follow soon, not to mention ESPN2 HD in January. Not counting the Voom-only/ exclusive HD channels, DTV carries or will carry soon, just about every available HD channel out there (plus 100 NFL games this season via Sunday Ticket), so you can't really blame them for a lack of HD content. The big stuff comes next summer - HD locals to the top 50 or so markets (Minneapolis-St. Paul is #14 on the DMA list, so you'd be almost guaranteed to see HD locals next summer) with the rest of the locals being added in 2007.

      And on the TiVo side, you find that you feel oblgated to watch stuff that tivo records and that you enjoy? Isn't that the point/ benefit of the TiVo, rather than an issue?

    4. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by futuresheep · · Score: 1
      Yeah, the HD coverage of the US Open was really great. I especially like how it switched to SD for the entire second set of the men's final. Thanks a lot, CBS.

      I agree with the upthread, and I'm about ready to cancel my Comcast service. All I watch is 1 hour of TV on HBO every Sunday, maybe one college football game, if a good team is on and in HD (otherwise I prefer the radio broadcasts), and if I'm feeling particularly unambitious, reruns of Law & Order. Hardly worth the $80/month it's costing me.

      Also the CompressCast image quality tends to be terrible. HBO usually looks good, and the other HD channels look okay, but the Olympics coverage was compressed to an unrecognizable tile mosaic, and the remainder of the 700+ standard-def channels are all squeezed into what appears to be about 100kHz of bandwidth. They just look horrible.

      Didn't watch the Men's final, but then again, Comcast in Seattle doesn't have the CBS HD feed. This is why we watch the OTA broadcast. We tried Comcast's HD service, but had the same issues you did.

    5. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by amigabill · · Score: 1

      >IMO, alot of whats coming right now is technology
      >for technologies sake. I admit that i am captivated
      >by the appeal of a distributed mythTV setup with
      >FEs all over the house, but really, i shouldn't be
      >watching enough tv to justify that.

      I'm building (or trying to more accurately) a MythTV box. I get Comcast analog-only basic+extended (mostly only watch Scifi for Stargate and Cartoon Network for Futurama reruns) and don't watch much else than those two shows. The MythTV box fills up plenty of time in itself. I'm not good with Linux, but I've learned a great deal through this project. I screw the thing up enough that I have to keep working on it, and haven't really got to use it for much recording TV yet after a year and a half. Haven't got Lirc or Samba or Svideo TV-output working yet, things seem to fall apart and I start again from scratch before I get those things working.

      I don't know if I'll ever get to use it normally as a TV recording thing, but it's certainly been a way to learn about Linux. That's really become my reason to mess with the thing, I'm not sure I'll ever reach my goal of actually using it as a fully usable Myth box...

      People tell me I could have long ago just bought a Tivo for less than the computer cost me, but that's not really the point now is it? :)

    6. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1

      Wait... ESPN2-HD? 95% of what's on ESPN-HD is upconverted SD with sidebars. Why do they need a second HD channel when they're barely using their first?

      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    7. Re:neat.. but whats the point :/ by The+Wicked+Priest · · Score: 1
      I have a Hughes HDVR2 Series2 DirecTivo. It was cool and all, but what I really wanted was a way to get content off of it and watch it on a computer. No home media option for DirecTivo users though. Nice.
      The Home Media Option wouldn't have got you that anyway. It only allows sharing video with other Tivos, and only MP3s and pictures with your desktop computer. (There's another service coming soon, "TivoToGo", that may allow it.) But you can get the content off an HDVR2 (and even run HMO on it, for that matter), by hacking it. I have scads of DVDs with DirecTV content extracted from my HDVR2. (It's nonstandard for DVD -- 480x480 -- but plays in all my DVD players.) Check out http://dealdatabase.com/forum for details.
      --
      Share and Enjoy: 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  39. Re:Where is this wording? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you take a look at PAGE 2 of the article?

  40. Re:Over The Air vs Cable/Satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently bought an HD tuner card made by DVico. I am fairly happy with it. The new version of the software is much easier to use. They now also have a QAM version available.

  41. Myth TV by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Myth TV (http://www.mythtv.org/)is the best software out there to use under BSD. Wendey Seltzer actually used the program and make it fully functional. on here website you have full directions, drivers and programs to do it. http://wendy.seltzer.org/mythtv/ I myself am looking this for an option to build my own with a DVD recorder. IF serveral people are interested in this kind of project let me know, maybe we can share insight and idea.

    --



    NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  42. Sasem USB 2.0 onAir HDTV by Jackson_Ash · · Score: 0

    http://www.usbhdtv.com/

    You can buy one in the US at:

    http://www.copperbox.com/lite/sasem.php/

    Avsforum thread:

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?s=&t hreadid=373490&highlight=sasem/

    For those that don't have a free PCI slot, this is the way to go. Once the highest of powers grants me permission, I'll be grabbing one myself.

    JA

  43. 3dinfo@maficstudios goto hell ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your email is 3dinfo@maficstudios.com so it seems. Goto hell MF.

    1. Re:3dinfo@maficstudios goto hell ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is that my email address?

  44. Re:Where is this wording? by CdBee · · Score: 1

    No. it's just on the second page of the two-page article... PS :-p

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  45. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by jmb295 · · Score: 1

    With the DirecTivo's it is not necessary to connect the phone line. I have 3 at home, and 2 have not been connected to a phone line in over a year. They download the program data from the satellite, but you will not receive any software updates.

  46. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by danielobvt · · Score: 1

    Though one may note that for anyone with more than one machine the economics of the choice changed with the new multiple account discount they are offering. If you aleady have one machine, then the logic of buying another machine and getting a Lifetime pass are very questionable ($5 a month vs $300 lifetime cost calls it into doubt)

  47. Re:Where is this wording? by SpecBear · · Score: 1
    It's in there, on page 2:
    The D-VHS's biggest failing, though, was that it couldn't record in HD from most digital video recorders, thanks to JVC's spectacularly stupid decision to leave out the three most common high-def video inputs in favor of a digital FireWire connector with built-in copy-control circuitry; only a handful of other devices support this.
    Are you trying to access the site from China? I hear they have some censorship issues over there.
  48. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    he did say aggregated information

  49. D-VHS does accept unencrypted input by captaineo · · Score: 1

    I have a JVC D-VHS recorder. It will happily record unencrypted MPEG-2 on the FireWire input.

    (However, this is sort of a moot point, since it is almost impossible to find a cable/satellite service that will deliver unencrypted video via FireWire. The only one I know of is a certain hardware-modded satellite receiver)

    I wouldn't single out JVC though. D-VHS has been available for at least a year; back when it came out, none of the other interfaces like DVI were standardized yet. You will never see a consumer unit that records via analog HD YPbPr anyway. It will either be encrypted FireWire or (more likely) encrypted DVI.

    1. Re:D-VHS does accept unencrypted input by InsaneGeek · · Score: 1

      My comcast Moto 6208 gives me unencrypted video out firewire, which I then record to my linux box that emulates a D-VHS recorder. No hardware modding, a bit of software (but not too much) mucking but it works like a champ... until you run out of disk space.

  50. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    BUt is my name attached to that?

    No, and it never has been.

    I don't want that, and I can't trust TiVo *not* to sell my name.

    I'm surprised by that - especially because, IIRC, TiVo is opt-in.

    Why don't you trust them? What reason have they given you not to trust them?

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  51. FireWire products-Chicken or the egg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Here's hoping we can fight the Broadcast Flag. Unfortunately, I can see a future where our kids think that the only way they can watch what they want to watch, when they want to watch it, and on the device they wish to watch it on, is by illegally downloading it from a P2P network, instead of being able to legally record it and move it around THEMSELVES with equipment THEY BOUGHT from a service THEY PAY FOR in their OWN HOMES."

    So why aren't you yelling at all the pirates who brought about this mess? Nope, Slashdot would rather encourage the kind of behaviour that only makes the situation worse, rather than the behaviour that would make it better (self-discipline for starters).

  52. Tivo Interview questions by kallistiblue · · Score: 3, Informative

    I spoke to one of the media contacts at Tivo and they said they would be happy to do an interview on my LCD tv site. The media contact said that she would be happy to connect me with any of their engineers.
    I would love to collect good questions for this Tivo Interview. Please feel free to visit the site and post your questions and I will do my best to get answers.

    --
    Laugh at my ignorance while I learn Rails - a Real ne
  53. Content vs. price? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    Bitch about DirecTV all you want.

    You'll go right back as soon as you see your cable company's prices.

    DirecTV's basic Total Choice package? $40/mo, includes SciFi.

    Want SciFi if you're a Cablevision subscriber? Please cough up $80-90/month, oh yeah and you still get fewer channels than DTV's Total Choice package.

    Damn trees in the front lawn blocking my house's view of the DTV sat. Between CV's price insanity and those trees, my TV comes through a classic V/U antenna in the attic and I just get Stargate: Atlantis and SG-1 episodes via BitTorrent.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  54. Copy-right is copy-wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I really really hope someone is working on breaking this one."

    Why? Encryption at best might interfere with going to a lower format, but it doesn't have to (analog jacks). Encryption doesn't interfere with storage or transportation (which fair use allows). The only thing that people are mad about is that they can't share their copy with a thousand of their friends. Big loss there, invite everyone over to your house to watch. You guys need the social contact anyway.

    1. Re:Copy-right is copy-wrong. by GoRK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So that I can record some TV to watch later... So that I can watch a DVD... So that I can continue to use my TV to watch TV without having to worry that the next time I rent a movie it will completely disable my television. Contrary to what you may believe, people like me are not all P2P crazed file swapping junkies. I purchase DVD's. I buy my digital music, and I pay my cable bill. I don't have time to rip and share every movie under the sun.

      Have you actually read anything about how the C5 copy control is implemented? The 'analog hole' argument does not hold a lot of ground when re-digitizing the content or othewise storing it is prohibitively expensive, and as far as encryption not interefering with storage -- well I guess it shouldn't but it does, unfortunately. Have you tried to play a Divx (Circuit-city's version, not the codec) recently? You can be content storing an encrypted version all you want, but unless there is a 100% effective way to recover the original data, you are lost. The problem is not the crypto itself, but the copy control and how licenses are granted. The industry will happily grant a cable box manufacturer a device key after they can demonstrate their unit capable of respecting the copy control rules; however, they will never grant MythTV such a key even if the software becomes capable of respecting their copy control provisions. The reasoning, I guess, is that it would be easier to circumvent copy control in some open source software than it would be on a cable box.

  55. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
    I don't trust people unless they have proven themselves to be trustworthy. And since TiVo's primary responsibility is to make a profit, they don't have my best interests at heart unless it's profitable.

    So their choice is to sell my information behind my back (but legally, since it's in the contract) and increase profits, or not make a profit and keep my information secure. I would prefer a company *not* have that kind of power over me.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  56. Motorola 6208 by Fraser+Cain · · Score: 1

    I've got a Motorola 6208, which has the single HD tuner and 80 GB hard drive. I'm really happy with the box, and it only cost me $650 CDN. We can't get HD over the air here in Canada, and none of our satellite companies offer a HD PVR yet, so this is the only feasible option. The hard drive is small, but I don't really care. I've got a computer with a tuner connected to my HDTV as well, and it's busy archiving stuff that I want to hang onto. I generally delete stuff off the PVR once I've watched it. The only shows I want to archive are shows for my kids - every episode of Dora the Explorer, Bob the Builder, Spongebob, etc.

    --
    Publisher, Universe Today - http://www.universetoday.com
  57. Parent was posted by: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bluewee!!!!

  58. I am... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am yelling at the pirates. But that's not the point: no matter what the industry does, the pirates will still pirate. They'll break every encryption, work around every roadblock, and will still do everything they do now, and have always done.

    The only people really affected by things like the Broadcast Flag and encryption of content are the ordinary, paying, law-abiding consumers. The pirates still pirate, and we can do less and less with the things that we OWN - or rather, we can only do what the media moguls' whims let us do.

    1. Re:I am... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "The only people really affected by things like the Broadcast Flag and encryption of content are the ordinary, paying, law-abiding consumers. The pirates still pirate, and we can do less and less with the things that we OWN - or rather, we can only do what the media moguls' whims let us do."

      Quiz question: the purpose of the broadcast flag is:
      [ ] to prevent "piracy"
      [ ] to control ordinary consumers
      [ ] to sell the same thing multiple times

      List them in order of importance

  59. HDCAM or D5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just buy an HDCAM deck from Sony or a D5 deck from Panasonic. Sure, they cost upwards of $50k each, but the picture sure does look good....

  60. What format war? by Atario · · Score: 1

    TAPE?? Please. The war is over. Disks (optical and magnetic) won.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:What format war? by fredistheking · · Score: 1

      Have you ever backed-up a network?

    2. Re:What format war? by connorbd · · Score: 1

      Try doing video production from DVD-R. The tools out there for low-to-midrange video production tend to like DV-25 signals, which are largely tape-based (MiniDV primarily, as well as DVCPRO and Digital8). I'm sure hard-drive based DV-25 units can be built trivially, but I have yet to hear of one, and given the flexibility gained from using removable media ($6 for 11GB/1hr SDTV on a MiniDV tape) I don't think I'd switch over any time soon.

      Check out www.coolatoola.com -- they provide a tool for doing data backups using MacOS X and a DV camcorder. I'd be very surprised if their product was the only one doing that trick, too -- with the right tools, MiniDV is one of the best bargains going for data backup capacity.

  61. Re:Over The Air vs Cable/Satellite by CityZen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Satellite uses QPSK or ("turbo") 8PSK, not QAM.

    The QPSK is pretty standardized, whereas the 8PSK is still being tweaked by various parties for maximum bandwidth. Of course, most HDTV broadcasts use 8PSK.

    Once you get above the encoding layer, there's the encyption. The cable industry appears to have settled on cablecard as a means for standardizing the encryption setup (I think this may have been forced on them by the FCC).

    However, unlike in Europe, where satellite receivers have been standardized, US satellite systems are very proprietary, and even where they use international standards (Dish uses DVB and Nagra encryption), they will not let you subscribe using anything but their own proprietary hardware.

  62. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

    Actually, you do receive software updates over the satellite connection. How do I know? Because my hacked DirecTivo which isn't plugged into a phone line at all (and has a hack running to prevent the 'call home' to give statistics and report what OS its using) just downloaded the latest update this weekend. It hasn't installed it - another hack, since that would wipe out all my extra software - but its there.

    --
    "Stumble before you crawl"
  63. HDTivo in the guest bathroom by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They'll have HDTivos in all those secondary rooms (guest bedroom, kitchen, etc) of their house.

    I agree with your larger point, though -- the cable company provided box is a huge defense against obsolence, repair, and overpriced periodic subscription fees (or "lifetime" gambles).

    It's one of the reasons that Tivo is in a tough spot; people who need a cable box will find the cable provided box to be an automatic "yes", given that it's little or no extra cost and zero integration effort as is required with a Tivo.

    Tivo's salvation *may* be the new cable-card standard, which would give a standalone Tivo access to the same digital bitstream as the cable company provided boxes, enabling stuff like multi-channel recording and HD recording far simpler (since you just store the bitsream off the line, not re-encoding the actual picture).

    I've been told that the cable companies really don't like being in the hardware business. While it seems like easy money, in many urban areas the losses and repairs have to make it a break-even deal at best.

  64. Re:Imagine having ALL of your entertainment equipm by CityZen · · Score: 1

    Wow. You know, I used to think the "problem" with the internet was that it was created in an environment of implicit trust, and thus email and usenet news etc. have problems with spam and spoofing and viruses.

    But now you've made me realize that this same problem extends to any gadget that talks to another one over any cable.

    Once paranoia becomes implicit instead of trust, you can imagine that the standard response of any gadget to any command is "why should I listen to you?" You can also imagine all the additional configuration that will be necessary to answer that challenge.

  65. Re:DirecTV HD Tivo HR10-250 by tgibbs · · Score: 1

    It looks like occasionally the card with the HDMI on it gets jarred loose in shipping. Some people have simply taken off the lid and pushed it back into place. Others, less willing to mess around with a unit under warranty, have simply returned it for replacement.

  66. Article Error by natelr · · Score: 1

    The DirecTV and Dish recorders both retail for $1,000, but Dish's can also be rented free as part of an ongoing promotion (Dish customers pay a $5-a-month service charge either way).

    This is not true as far as I can find it. You can lease a regular DVR for $5 a month, but if you want Dish's version of the HD DVR you still have to shell out around $1,000. If I am wrong, please correct me but I have been researching this a lot lately since I am debating which service I want.

    1. Re:Article Error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please pay attention when you read. There's a disclaimer at the top of the article pointing out that the article is mistaken with regard to renting the HD DVR.

  67. they left out some others by dreadlocks · · Score: 2, Informative

    LG-3410A (there is an older Zenith version also). This can record OTA HD, but apparently cannot playback while recording. It has active firewire ports for archiving to DVHS. I hear folks have put 300GB drives in them without fuss. Was $800, but now are $600ish.

    RCA-DVR10: this is a firewire only solution. two plugs: power and firewire. I hear it is unreliable, plus you can't buy them in a local shop. You should be able to daisy chain to DVHS.

    Firewire ain't that bad. To record HD, I go onto my integrated set, then tell the timer to record a show, it turns on the vcr, sends the show to the DVHS deck (mine was $90 at Best Buy) and turns it off. Again I have 2 cables: firewire and power. Yea, it's tape, but I'll spend $90 plus a few tapes (which can be found for much cheaper online than their "retail" prices) before I spend $600+ on a HD unit.

    I'm not that much on the bleeding edge. I'll wait for prices to come down and more features to be crammed in. PLUS, other units are coming that support cablecard. I can afford to be patient, as long as I can record the occasional HD show that I absolutely cannot miss.

    DVHS seems to be a stopgap technology ... ultimately the best thing would be to have a unit that records to a HDD and can archive to HD-DVD (or Blu-ray), that has integrated firewire for other units that may come along.

    Last thing: the article implied that the JVC deck should have been able to record over component video. Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but recording an analog HD signal over component wires would require the signal to be (re)encoded in realtime to be recorded. This is $$$ for the chip, compared to just recording a straight digital signal.

  68. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by smackjer · · Score: 1

    You don't "need" program listings, but they are an excellent feature, and open up a lot of possibilities that traditional VCR-style recording by channel/date/time can't provide. For example, you can record anything from a favorite actor, director, writer, genre, etc., and Tivo will automatically detect that a show you like has changed timeslots. Most shows are NOT repeated every four hours. You don't "need" a TV at all, yet I assume you have one, and probably a monthly cable or satellite bill to go along with it. And yes, it's Linux-based, but what does that have to do with software upgrades? Tivo's software is a lot different today than it was 3 or 4 years ago, and without downloadable updates, you'd have to jump through hoops to get new features and bug fixes. I want a car that can drive 200 MPH, never breaks down, has a 30 speaker stereo system, built-in DVD player, and I want it for under $10,000 with no strings attached. Not going to happen any time soon.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  69. Some info should have been better researched.. by tji · · Score: 1

    I love my HD-Tivo. He had some good points on the limitations, but he seemed to misunderstand some of the reasons behind them, or existing ways to solve them.

    Some wrong or misleading info:

    - "JVC's decision to use firewire was a mistake". He obviously doesn't anderstand what is involved in recording HD video. Firewire is used to xfer the compressed digital data stream -- the raw, unmodified MPEG2 stream that is sent from the broadcaster. Recording by any other means (RGB/VGA, YPrPb, DVI) requires the recorder to re-compress the video with MPEG2 or some other format (think of trying to record the VGA output from your computer.. this is the same as recording HDTV.. You don't record the analog output, you record the original digital data). HD MPEG encoders are extremely expensive pieces of hardware (currently just used in professional video production).

    The issue is not JVC's choice of connections, firewire is definitely the best choice for this function, the issue is the MPAA's pressure on satellite companies to not allow external archiving of HD material. So, despite customer outcry, DirecTV has refused to include a firewire port. Dish does include a firewire port, but it is currently disabled - and they are calling it "dishwire", presumably to limit its functionality if needed.

    But, cable companies are beginning to include firewire ports on their HD boxes. There is some FCC directive saying that the new cable boxes must include a firewire port for recording. But, I think this is still not a done deal.

    Several DVD recorders also include firewire input ports. It is definitely the right port for the job..

    - Sluggish Tivo operation. Yes, I would like the HD Tivo to operate faster.. But, this can be minimized by using the other still Tivo guide. The other guide shows the current playing programs in one column, then a longer list of upcoming programs for the selected channel in the second column. This updates faster because it only needs to update one channel. And, it's better for selecting programs to record, because you can quickly see all the programs on the channel you want for the next two weeks.

    - Dish forward skip button. This is a nice feature. Tivo can also do this if you enter a short series of keypresses on the remote to change the functionality of the jump-to-end and instant-replay keys. The jump-to-end changes to 30 second skip, and the replay becomes a 7 second rewind in case you go too far.

    1. Re:Some info should have been better researched.. by dreadlocks · · Score: 1

      The firewire plug is the same, but the protocol to transfer over firewire to DVD is not the same as the protocol to transfer to DVHS. I understand they are not compatible, otherwise you'd be able to record downrezzed HD programming to DVD over that interface.

      firewire to DVD is for camcorders.

    2. Re:Some info should have been better researched.. by tji · · Score: 1

      In either case, it's just transferring compressed multimedia data (either MPEG2 in HDTV or DVD, and DV for your camcorder). The recording device either dumps the data to disk, or transcodes it to a format for playback (DV -> MPEG2 for DVD playback).

      But, my point was that the firewire port is the best choice, and pretty much the standard way, to transfer compressed multimedia data.

      He was way off base in the article by saying they should record the analog (RGB, YPrPB) or DVI/HDMI ports, since recording those is either prohibitively expensive or impossible (DVI-HDCP/HDMI is encrypted, to prohibit any attempt at recording).

  70. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by smackjer · · Score: 1

    This is a good point, but someone looking at purchasing their first (and probably only, at least for a while) Tivo would be well-advised to purchase the lifetime sub. A second or third unit would probably be cheaper in the long run at $5/month.

    --

    This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  71. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    "Could somebody point me to a homebrew PVR tutorial?"

    boy do I have the place for you

    Build your Own PVR Community (shameless plug, I know)

    =)

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  72. What about encryption? by JustNiz · · Score: 1

    Do any of these units have a standard DVI output and ignore the dreaded broadcast flag?

    (I want to still use my non HDCP/HDMI-compliant projector to watch all HD programming at best resolution after mid-2005 ).

  73. Re:Imagine having ALL of your entertainment equipm by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

    The problem of viruses occurrs because companies produced programmable products without considering the security consequences.

    Viruses for environments that have decent security models, like Linux, FreeBSD, and MacOS X are rare-to-nonexistant, unless one is running Microsoft Office in that environment.

    Most of what people call "computer viruses" are only "MicroSoft viruses".

  74. oh.. by bmajik · · Score: 1

    i am not saying there's anything better..

    we have no TV service _at all_ now..

    Of the stuff out there, i think DTV or Dish is the best stuff, with the nod going to DTV because of DirecTivo (replayTV might be more featureful, but its historically been just awful compared to tivo), and i dont give any cable companies any money at all, and haven't since i left my parents home. (DSL and DTV, all the way)

    I have just gotten to the point where even DTV doesn't seem worthwhile anymore.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  75. Fargo by bmajik · · Score: 1

    we're in fargo. so we have to get the fargo local stations, (which were just enabled in summer of 04), which generally do not carry the games.

    the regional fox sports net channel doesn't show up until you upgrade packages.

    its frankly not my problem why direcTV cant give us a reliable feed of twins games. For a while, everyone was upset with Victory Sports Network (which bought the tv rights to most twins games and wouldn't deal with anybody except on their terms).. i can tell you that we got less than 5 the whole season.. heck we WENT to more games than we saw on TV :/

    ReplayTV offers something like home media, iirc.

    Re: HD content - no, i'm not blaming dtv for lack of HD content. Lack of HD content is a pervasive issue, but the ltitle shred thats out there is an additional premium package from DTV... once upon a time it was like 3 HD channels for like $15 extra a month, in addition to buying a new receiver that was also quite expensive.

    It's gotten better, and will continue to get better, but that still doesn't really fix the content issue i mentioned earlier, and i still feel like anyone doing HD is an early adopter at this stage..

    finally, no matter how many HD channels they add, uninteresting time-sucking crap is still uninteresting time-sucking crap, even at high resolution with 5.1 audio.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  76. OTA HDTV? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

    I want a Tivo that will record and playback over-the-air hdtv.

    Apart from making my own out of an old computer and some baling wire, what are my options?

    1. Re:OTA HDTV? by stevel · · Score: 1

      The DirecTV-TiVo recorder mentioned in the article also records OTA digital TV (including HDTV). But a DirecTV subscription is required - you can't use it JUST to record OTA. It actually has a fourth tuner for unencrypted QAM cable digital, for what that's worth (not much).

  77. Or record the stream directly off DirecTV/Dish... by paul_friedman · · Score: 1

    These guys: http://169time.com/ will add FireWire to your DirecTV, Dish STBs so that you can do this. They also provide a How-To guide for recording in High-Def. You can just FireWire pipe this into your HTPC and rock and roll!

  78. Looking for an OS X solution to view via FireWire by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have one of the new Motorola HD-DVR boxes that Comcast puts out, and a handy-dandy new Dual 2.5ghz G5 with 30" cinema (don't hate me, I just sold my primary residence and took a little profit, is all...). I'm able to connect the two boxes via FireWire and record (through a couple of clunky apps out there) the packetized MPEG2 stream to a disk file, and play it back with VLC... but all I want to be able to do is VIEW the cablebox signal via the FireWire connection and use the 30" cinema display as an HD screen, avoiding the cost of a separate (redundant hardware!) HDTV... It already has a PVR so I don't need to record.

    Does ANYONE know of anything out there (or that will be out there) that will accomplish this?

  79. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    So their choice is to sell my information behind my back (but legally, since it's in the contract) and increase profits, or not make a profit and keep my information secure. I would prefer a company *not* have that kind of power over me.

    Which part of "Opt In" don't you understand?

    You have more to worry about if you own a credit card. Much much more.

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  80. Re:Where is this wording? by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    Isn't a -1 Flamebait a bit extreme for an honest mistake?

  81. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1

    Which part of "don't want to be dealing with someone who doesn't have my best interests at heart" don't *you* understand?

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  82. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    Which part of "don't want to be dealing with someone who doesn't have my best interests at heart" don't *you* understand?

    Yet you promote Apple. Who don't have your best interests at heart.

    Who do you deal with?

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  83. Re:Looking for an OS X solution to view via FireWi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check this link .

  84. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by Paulrothrock · · Score: 1
    Apple doesn't have access to my viewing choices that they can sell to people.

    And, no, I don't download from their music store. I use it to sample music before pirating it.

    Let's just say I don't like giving out information to people who don't need it and who will use it without permission. Radio Shack still thinks I live at 1234 fake street.

    --
    I'm in the hole of the broadband donut.
  85. Re:Washington Post likes TiVo? by spectecjr · · Score: 1

    And, no, I don't download from their music store. I use it to sample music before pirating it

    Ah, so you're not just paranoid. You're thieving scum as well. Ok.

    --
    Coming soon - pyrogyra
  86. Re:you want to be an early adopter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the other hand, maybe this is a technology that you want to be an early adopter of to avoid cards that end up getting crippled by "broadcast flag" laws.

    July 1, 2005 is the cutoff date.

    gewg_