Lucas Also Plans
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 5, Funny
To receive the Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition in 2005, and the Super Extended Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition Platinum in 2014.
Re:Lucas Also Plans
by
feidaykin
·
· Score: 5, Funny
Yeah, in a recent interview, Lucas said:
"I was only about 40% happy with the original award. There were things we just couldn't do when I first got it. The new award, I am 95% happy with. The fans of the awards may take some issue with it, but the award is for me, not them."
Spoiling the joke by explaining it here: The 40% figure is what Lucas said about how happy he was with the original Star Wars when it was finished in 1977. He then went on to say he was 95% happy with Episode I. Which proves that the less happy he is with a film, the more happy everyone else is...;)
--
"To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking
Well yes. But it also indicates that he's probably like Rain Man since he can whip out figures like that from his head and actually quantify his gut feelings. Must be something ALL "comic book guys" can relate to.;P
If Lucas is only 40% happy with the original Star Wars, then I want 60% of my money back!
Re:Lucas Also Plans
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The truly sad thing about the hundreds of posters who post here with derogatory remarks about Lucas is that most of you own the DVD's and have seen all the movies. If he's such a screw-up why did you buy the DVD's? So stop whinging about him being a talentless money-grabber already!
And you'd be doing well in life if you had even a hundredth of his talent, drive, and vision.
I notice Harrison Ford won it in 2000. So Han (sorry Ford) won it first.
Give it a few years, and they'll release a special edition of the award, where Lucas wins first.
Remastered trilogy
by
Nova1313
·
· Score: 3, Funny
I didn't know trashing the trilogy was an achievement... go figure... fp?
-- There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
Re:Remastered trilogy
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Hey, let's see you build a legacy so great it's protected by an act of congress, and then so thoroughly destroy it that no one gives a crap about it any more.
In other news, AFI is changing it's name to the American Federation of Irrelevant Attention Whores, and will endevour to add more noise to the signal on a quarterly basis. That is all.
-- There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
Re:Remastered trilogy
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Actually George Lucas did not trash the trilogy, he simply changed it to the way he originally wanted it done, and now that he has the technology he can do that, as opposed to when he made them in 1979 1980 and 1983. Pick up a biography some time you might learn something.
Considering Yoda was Frank Oz, I don't know what good it would do to have Jim Henson around. Of course, it would be interesting to hear his take on the crapitude of the Muppet movies since he died...
-- "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
Re:Yoda Speak
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Who voted that mind-numbing, banally predictably stupid post as "Funny"?
Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?
That's just the sad thing of this award. If the film industry had realized the long ranging impact of the 3 originals, they probably would have handed Lucas the award in the 80s. By now recieving an award doesn't make any sense because of low quality prequals, etc... but how can you know something is a classic in less than 10 years?
--
"And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
Re:I will.
by
mankey+wanker
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Hey, I practically hate most of the guy's movies - but let's not forget what Lucas has done for special effects, cinema sound, etc. Somehow he was also partly responsible for the film "Mishima" which I think is quite brilliant. "American Graffiti" wasn't bad either.
But anyway, the next time the special effects appear to be seemless and the sound quality vibrates your theater seat - remember Lucas for caring about that stuff. He's certainly moved some things along which is more than most people do.
Then again, you should thank Lucas for that as well as he and Skywalker Ranch are very involved with old film preservation and restoration (though not into preserving his own films...but that's beside the point here...but perhaps after he's gone, Skywalker Ranch will "restore" the original 1977 Star Wars...hey, stranger things have happened.)
--
"Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Informative
but let's not forget what Lucas has done for special effects, cinema sound, etc.
He deserves a special award because he looked at the current state of audio and video and turned his nose up at it and demanded more money be spent on more technology? Sounds like he simply demanded a higher level of medium in which to do his work, he had a team of guys do their homework then slap his company name on the project and declare "if you don't have THX then you are nothing, btw, it costs $90,000 to for a license to use THX, thanks in advance".
Just because the first invented a stop sign doesn't mean they would never have been invented.
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Easy now. Howard the Duck was an unforgettable epic tale of a duck trying to find his place in the world and as far as movies about ducks go is second to none.
Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?
I liked his movies a lot, especially as a kid.:-) Ahh, those were the days...!
Only as I've grown older I'm seeing the flaws in his movies, but who's to say a prize should only be given because adults don't like something. I doubt these movies were intended for adults after all, because of the clearly defined "good and evil" so even very young people understand what's going on.
I can't speak for him being worthy this award or not, but given the right audiences (and I don't think it's particularly small), it's a masterpiece.
-- Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Just because the first invented a stop sign doesn't mean they would never have been invented.
So being first deserves no credit in your mind? Somebody else probably would have applied the concepts of calculus to phyics, but Newton gets quite a bit of respect for having done it first
I didn't mean to inadvertantly compare Lucas to Newton though, oops...
Don't forget he contributed to the Indiana Jones movies as well. He also invented through his studios some technical achievments for movies. Probably the rationale here.
I take good movies in black and white with mono sound over bad movies with excelent visual and sound effects.
It's not just stupid blockbusters. ILM type effects, as they trickle down to cheaper and cheaper production companies, have a huge influence on movies high and low, probably the largest change in the look of films since French New-Wave techniques. "Amelie" used CGI effects in nearly every scene (if just to increase contrast), low-budget "Eurotrip" inserted the Tower of London to a scene of Prague, to avoid the budget hit of a trip to London. Cannes award winner "Oldboy" used computer effects to visualize memories. I don't have to mention "Lord of the Rings."
-- Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
Yeah, do three good movies constitute grounds for a lifetime achievement award? (Yes, only three.) Aren't there a lot of other directors who made three movies and didn't dig up their franchises when their careers were going sour?
"Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?"
Like or hate Star Wars, it's hard to ignore the whole bit about ILM's advances in visual FX.
" "He has advanced the art of the moving image like few others, and in the process has inspired a new generation of filmmakers around the world."
Star Wars may suck, but that has little bearing on the above comment.
"I take good movies in black and white with mono sound over bad movies with excelent visual and sound effects."
George gave moviemakers better tools. He can't make other moviemakers make better movies.
-- "Derp de derp."
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
> I don't have to mention "Lord of the Rings."
And you shouldn't have, as you've missed his point the same way a television executive misses witty and clever shows.
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
What what the point, except to be snooty, "art films don't need special effects?"
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Did he do the tools himself, or just demanded better tools and let his superiors do the actual work?
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The point is that GL wasn't the first to do special effects. The award should go to the ILM special effects guys, because they are the ones who do the actual effects. Speaking of audio I'm waiting for a movie with a binaural soundtrack, but it seems that milking home users with surround equipment is a higher priority than effective sound...
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Yawn?! Who cares?! Are you an f-ing nut? Do you even know the shit George Lucas has had to put up with in making his films? Those bunch of "low-quality plot-recipe movies" that you are talking about (episodes 1 and 2 I presume) were thought up by Lucas around the time of the originals, but now that he has the technology (made by his own companies) he can finally do them the he wanted, and the originals would probably be the way that he really intended. And yes we should give him the award, because of the way he has revolutionized the film industry. Pick up a book sometime and read about facts before you spit out some stupid comment.
Re:I will.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
oh, and by the way i'm not an anonymous coward i just don't have a computer or email, and that's why i'm doing this from my school computer. submitted by k4m!k4z3 age 18.
It's an immense achievement. Jar-Jar was so bad that it made the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft.
-- Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
Re:Hmmmm...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
>I was unaware that giving birth to Jar-Jar Binks >was considered as a "life achievement"... > >Then again, everything depends on what you mean >by "achievement".
yes, squirting out such an interesting piece of excrement...a talking one at that...is most definately a "life achievement".
I think the real achievment here is that, while Jar Jar was completetely OUT OF FREAKING CONTROL in the first prequel, he was actually able to seemlessly STFU and all but go away in the second one.
I don't think that was the least bit conspicuous:-)
> > "Jar-Jar was so bad that it made the Ewoks look like fucking Shaft"
> >I hope you're happy. I'll never be able to watch Shaft again without imagining an Ewok playing the role:).
Who's the furry private dick
That's a sex machine to all the chicks?
WICKET!
Yub dammmn nub!
Coatee cha tu goo (Shaft!)
coatee cha tu doo (Shaft!)
coatee cha tu too (Shaft!)
Allay loo ta nuv!
I hope you're happy. I'll never be able to watch Shaft again without imagining an Ewok playing the role:).
Try thinking of it the other way. The Ewoks all played by Shaft. Now that would give the stormtroopers something to worry about. Han would probably have to be worried too. Once Leia's had Shaft, she'll never go back.
Re:Wait a sec...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 3, Funny
Mesah won no award!?!? Yousah kidding! Jar Jar given award by Naboo Princess! Kiss on cheek! Jar Jar no need lifetime achievement award. Mesah still archieve only half lifetime greatness. Yousah gonna see lotsa more of Jar Jar nows!
They won't redo the Indiana Jones films because Spielberg and others would have to be involved. Lucas doesn't have 100% control of that series so he needs get approval and signed contracts from too many folks to make changes.
-- "We make our world significant
by the courage of our questions
and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
I can't wait until 20 years down the road, when he releases the DVD of the AFI program, replacing a 60 year old Lucas with a virile 20 year old version of himself.
There will be space battles, too.
that that award was for someone who continues to innovate and pursue new things, not someone who does something great and spends the next 20 years tinkering with minute details of said work.
that that award was for someone who continues to innovate and pursue new things, not someone who does something great and spends the next 20 years tinkering with minute details of said work.
He has - you just weren't paying attention. He has caused a shit load of inventions to take place behind the camera. Because of him a ton of people got the money they needed to invent new effects, better sound systems, etc etc.
-- If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
Re:This one's got a bad motivator!
by
uberdave
·
· Score: 1
More appropriately:
George Lucas: I won the lifetime achievement award.
Luke Skywalker: No! That's not true. That's impossible!
George Lucas : Search your feelings. You know it to be true.
Luke Skywalker: Nooooo! Nooooo.
Re:and maybe next year...
by
sgant
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
Yeah, actually I think he fits in well on "Boston Legal"...even though it's "LA Law" meet's "The Practice" meet's "Ally McBeal" (which is no shocker since they were all David E. Kelly productions (Kelly took over "LA Law" at the end btw)).
--
"Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
Re:and maybe next year...
by
NMEismyNME
·
· Score: 1
and how could we forget his services to the music industry?
picture yourself... on a boat... on a river...
Re:and maybe next year...
by
kilgortrout
·
· Score: 1
To me his most memorable role will always be The Big Giant Head on Third Rock From The Sun.
Re:and maybe next year...
by
hookedup
·
· Score: 1
now there's an acceptance speech i'd like to see..
You should give his newest album, Has been, a listen. It's really good, it just came out. Look for it on suprnova.
Lifetime Achievement Award Requirements
by
modifried
·
· Score: 5, Informative
"The Life Achievement Award honors an individual whose career in motion pictures or television has greatly contributed to the enrichment of American culture.
The criteria stated that "the recipient should be one whose talent has in a fundamental way advanced the film art; whose accomplishment has been acknowledged by scholars, critics, professional peers and the general public; and whose work has stood the test of time." In 1993, AFI trustees extended the criteria to encompass individuals with active careers and work of significance yet to be accomplished. "
Re:Lifetime Achievement Award Requirements
by
AndrewStephens
·
· Score: 2, Funny
In 1993, AFI trustees extended the criteria to encompass individuals with active careers and
work of significance yet to be accomplished.
Sweet, my genius is yet to be recognised but it looks like I am elligable anyway.
Where do I submit my nomination?
-- sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
Re:Lifetime Achievement Award Requirements
by
tuxedobob
·
· Score: 1
Also in the article, dumbass.
I'm not scrolling back to see if you're also the person who posted the list of past winners, also in the article.
Lucas was a visionary
by
Goodl
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Despite the debacles that are the 'new' trilogy, no fan could watch the extras DVD that came with Star Wars and deny that it brought a lump to the throat to see how the film that defined space adventure for a generation was literally dragged kicking and screaming to the screen, all despite incredible odds, horrendous bad luck and dumbass studio execs through the sheer force of will and unshakable self belief that the story he was telling had to be told. Much as I really dont like how he conducts himself these days, no-one could say the man hasn't earned his place in history and in the hearts and minds of thirtysomethings globally. I can't hear the opening bars of the John Williams theme without getting chills down my spine and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
-- I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls
You'll recognise the view..
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
Dancin_Santa
·
· Score: 0, Troll
I can't hear the opening bars of the John Williams theme without getting chills down my spine and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
Good god, do you really have some sort of emotional bond with the original trilogy to such an extent that it affects you physically just being reminded of it? That's not insightful, that's sad.
The sage wisdom of William Shatner and Chris Elliott comes to mind when reading your drooling fanboyism, "Get a life!"
Star Wars was a good bunch of movies. But they certainly aren't anyhing to spend more than a few seconds reminiscing about.
Lucas did some extraordinary things in his career, and he definitely deserves this award for those achievements. However, crossing the line from excited interest in his work to Pavlovian drooling at the sound of his name is just, as I said earlier, sad.
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
Jugalator
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Good god, do you really have some sort of emotional bond with the original trilogy to such an extent that it affects you physically just being reminded of it? That's not insightful, that's sad.
This "emotional bond" you speak of is common among people who like a movie, or any art form for that sake, a lot. I feel sad for you if you've never found a good enough movie to experience it. I can listen to great pieces of music and it gives me chills, and I can watch movies that brings me to tears. A whole lot of us can. I hope you can feel some kind of emotions when watching movies, since it's great things to experience.:-)
I can't imagine how boring going to the cinemas would be if you couldn't create an emotional bond to some of the characters, for example by humor, anger, love, sadness, or something else.
Star Wars was a good bunch of movies. But they certainly aren't anyhing to spend more than a few seconds reminiscing about.
What can I say... That's just your opinion, and if you have a hard time accepting others, feeling the need to look down on others, you're just narrow-minded.
-- Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
Jugalator
·
· Score: 1
You need a psychologist or possibly a general physical examination if that seriously happens to you.
No, I'd rather keep my emotions and stay away from a lobotomy, thank you very much...
-- Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Good god, do you really have some sort of emotional bond with the original trilogy to such an extent that it affects you physically just being reminded of it? That's not insightful, that's sad.
Nothing has intrinsic value. Anything that has value has value because a human gave it value. That you only care about putting other people down is what is really sad.
-- If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
I can't imagine how boring going to the cinemas would be if you couldn't create an emotional bond to some of the characters, for example by humor, anger, love, sadness, or something else.
I can, though i wouldn't reccomend it.
-- If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I know what you mean, I can't hear the hum of a light saber being swiped without simultaneously ejaculating and defecating in my pants, it gets messy.
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Well said.
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
fucksl4shd0t
·
· Score: 1
I had a lobotomy once. Nobody told me about it, so I did a scan of my brain. I found a big letter "F" carved into the side of one of my frontal lobes.
Re:Lucas was a visionary
by
cyber1kenobi
·
· Score: 1
I got goose bumps just readin' your mention of the opening theme. Anybody else associate the Fox thing at the begging of movies with every Fox movie they've seen since?:)
Does your lack of acceptance of someone else's opinion not make you equally narrow-minded?
Can one pass judgement on someone being narrow-minded without becoming narrow-minded themselves?
Hmmm, I need sleep
The man deserves it
by
Dancin_Santa
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
Having the dumb luck to stumble into the greatest movie franchise in history, Lucas has taken that little bit of luck and transformed it into his vision of a complete alternate universe. Had he been any other short-sighted director (Spielberg, I'm looking right at you and your last half of A.I.) the Star Wars trilogy would have simply ended with the dance of the Ewoks. However, Lucas was able to transform that complete story into a more complete story by going back and fixing and editing and putting in scenes that were originally not his vision in the first place. I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.
The problem is that most people cannot understand the mind of a visionary and it isn't until long after they fade into irrelevance that they truly become appreciated. So too it is with Lucas, I believe. Many people are so worried about their childhood memories that they cry wolf every time Lucas decides to change a scene. Nevermind the fact that the whole Star Wars universe makes more sense when the updated (Director's Cut, if you will) scenes are added to the films.
Lucas truly does deserve this award not only for what rich memories he brought to us when we were still kids, but also for the memories he gives kids of the future. When we look back in 20 years and reminisce about the Star Wars Nonology we will finally see why Greedo had to shoot first and why Jar Jar was crucial to the story of Anakin Skywalker.
Re:The man deserves it
by
Dunkelzahn
·
· Score: 4, Interesting
I think Revenge of the Sith is going to change alot of people's views of the Prequels and the Original Trilogy, in a good way. Judging from various leaks, spoilers, and Hyperspace tidbits, I think Revenge of the Sith will be the best of the prequels, and will be more than worthwhile.
As for Jar-Jar - we're supposed to hate him. He's the dumb bitch who hands the Republic over to Palpatine on a silver platter, so...
-- .
Re:The man deserves it
by
op51n
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
When we look back in 20 years and reminisce about the Star Wars Nonology we will finally see why Greedo had to shoot first and why Jar Jar was crucial to the story of Anakin Skywalker.
I totally disagree. I have tried not to care about the changes he continues to make, as I have copies of the original release that will keep me happy, but I just can't fathom his decisions. Well... No, that's not quite true.
I took a look at the comparison of the three releases, and the apparently dodgy censorship (the red flashes in the prison scene) and Greedo's shooting first, only appear to be ways of making the film more kid friendly. As of course Jar Jar and the awful slapstick he added in the Mos Eisley approach and other inserts also go to show.
I just can't understand why he is doing this. It removes about thirteen layers from Han's character, making him fairly uninteresting for a start.
It's not that I'm worried about my childhood memories. Like I say, I have the originals, my memories are intact. The problem is, now anyone who hasn't seen the originals will see the new DVD release, and it's not the same movie. I can fully appreciate a director's wish to go back and fix special effects, and even insert some new scenes to expand the scale - like with Mos Eisley. But I'd do it seriously. Adding laughs into those bits is lame and wrong pacewise.
Basically, he's taken his movies, and turned them into a cleaner, more child-friendly franchise. I almost wouldn't be surprised if he does release the unaltered remastered editions to get the rest of the available cash, but that depends on if he's willing to allow such violence to be seen! I've lost pretty much all my respect for the guy, aside from, as someone mentioned, what he did for sound and effects in the industry.
Re:The man deserves it
by
bob+beta
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Nevermind the fact that the whole Star Wars universe makes more sense when the updated (Director's Cut, if you will) scenes are added to the films.
You see, there's the problem. Great stories, and good movies, don't have to 'make sense' in that way. There's a trick in drama called the 'aesthetic distance' where the audience is supposed to 'buy into' the fact that the performance is an approximation, and expand the spectacle themselves, internally in their own mind.
Loose ends, paradoxes, etc. are supposed to be overwhelmed and become irrelevant because the dramatic effect smooths it all over.
Instead, in Lucas, and in filmmakers like him (sadly a dominant force these days in filmmaking) everything has to be 'real' or as 'real-seeming' as can be made possible.
It's like the difference between a fabulous Doctor Who episode, with cheese props but a wonderfully crafted story and brilliant acting, and the massively engineered psuedo-reality of the modern flicks. One works well within limits and succeeds in going beyond said limits. The other is just 'as good as it could be in the era it was produced' and people ten years later will obsess over the then-obsolete rough edges.
For a technician like Lucas, the second production makes him a ton of money. It also sells a lot more home theatre hardware and drives a need to continually upgrade the playback hardware in the theatres. I guess that stuff is important to some people.
Re:The man deserves it
by
WaterBreath
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I've got to wholeheartedly agree with the general sense of this article, that Lucas does deserve this award. I think people are overlooking some things when they consider this.
First of all, Lucas has made more than 5 movies. Second, Lucas has made more than 5 blockbuster movies. (He had to be doing something right.) Third, not only has he made blockbuster movies, but he's made meaningful movies, such as American Grafitti and THX-1138.
Regarding people's newfound hate of Lucas for his remastering/editing of the Star Wars Trilogy... I'll admit that I'm young enough that I saw the first three movies on VHS when I was very young. When the remastered versions came out I didn't remember the originals very well. It was like seeing them for the first time. And from that viewpoint I can tell you that the remakes are still good movies. I also think the prequels are good. As good as the originals. The problem is that the overall quality of movies in general has improved so much. There are many movies that flop today, but would have been blockbusters in the 1970s. The prequels are just not as far above the average today as the originals were when they came out.
Lucas essentially created the film epic. It may have been tried before, but Lucas was the first to do it successfully in both the eyes of his peers and the eyes of the public. And I'll go so far as to say that he has had no rival. The Matrix started out great, but most of the people that went to the third one did it only out of half-hearted hope and a desire for some sort of closure. The LOTR trilogy is awesome, but it's an adaptation, not an original work like Star Wars. (And don't talk about theft of concepts, because Tolkein was just as "bad", stealing from all sorts of mythologies.)
Lucas deserves this award, if solely for what he did with the original Star Wars movies. Even if you can't get over his recent changes, that doesn't changes how he affected the movie industry.
Re:The man deserves it
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
There's nothing sadder to see than a die-hard fan clinging to a shred of hope that this final movie is going to be the one that puts everything in perspective and makes two sucky movies good.
People said the same thing about the second Star Wars before it was released. People said the same thing about the third Matrix before it was released. And now, it would appear, that there are still some desperate souls saying it about the third Star Wars.
Listen, here's the reality: *Nothing* is going to change the fact that the first two prequels sucked. Even if the final installment brings back the magic of the original series, the first two prequels are *still* going to be virtually unwatchable. People's views on that are *not* going to change. A good movie that is associated with a sucky movie cannot make the sucky movie good.
I was a big fan of the original series too. I went into the TPM expecting the same magic. I left thinking "WTF was that!?!". I couldn't belive it was really the movie that sucked, so I went back for seconds because I thought maybe my mind wasn't open enough the first time. But that wasn't the case, and I walked out halfway through. My mind was plenty open, but in the immortal words of Carl Sagan, not so open that my brains had fallen out. The movie just sucked.
But then, I'm not one to live in a world of delusion. I may have strong emotional feelings, feelings of awe and excitment when it comes to the original series, but I don't let that cloud my judgement of reality. To see someone so far gone as to actually be suggesting that the ROTS is going to bring it all together, and apologizing for Jar-Jar of all things... it's just sad. It makes me fear for how much control advertising and the media can have over the lives of the people I share this planet with.
Re:The man deserves it
by
ScrewMaster
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
No, don't give Lucas a free pass on this one. Keep the pressure on.
The fact remains that it is perfectly possible to create a character that everyone is supposed to hate (say, Governor Tarkin, Darth Vader, Boba Fett, Jabba the Hutt, The Emperor himself, and of course all the lesser Empire underlings who were killed along the way) but Jar Jar was simply stupid, and Lucasfilms' mastery of digital effects didn't extend to making him a believable alien. Maybe they could now, renderfarms are bigger nowadays, but he just looked like a cartoon character stuck in the middle of an otherwise spectacular collection of special effects. I'm sorry, but I look at Jar Jar as a transparent effort to create more action-figure sales rather than a serious effort to develop a character that would advance the plot of the movie. You're supposed to hate a bad character for what he does. I hate Jar Jar because of what he is. If Lucas had had a clue as to how many die-hard Star Wars fans (like me) he would alienate with that bit of cinematic crap known as Jar Jar he might have rethought the whole thing. And that includes Jar Jar's entire clan: "Shield be going up!" and all that. Viewers were legitimately disappointed in Lucas for that.
-- The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
I almost wouldn't be surprised if he does release the unaltered remastered editions to get the rest of the available cash
He's been quoted as saying something to the effect of, (massively paraphrased) "I don't like those movies, the special edition versions are the ones I wanted. If you want the originals I'm sure you can dig them up on VHS somewhere, but it won't be coming from me."
I really like A.I. - I think it has a very special atmosphere, and the more I watch it the more it mesmerises me. Interestingly enough, even my wife liked it more the second time, and said "hmm.. yeah, there is something in it". For me, A.I. is a very powerful artistic event. It leaves me half-sad, but totally immersed.
"If Lucas had had a clue as to how many die-hard Star Wars fans (like me) he would alienate with that bit of cinematic crap known as Jar Jar he might have rethought the whole thing."
yes, becasue hundreds of millions dollars is a horrible thing to get when you've pissed off someone who is more obsessed with the films then the creator of said films.
Jar-Jar os a pawn of the Empire, nothing more. Clearly Palpatine set things in motion so that Jar-Jar would end up in the position Palpatine needed him to be.
My respect for ther Jar-Jar character would have gone up tremendiously if he had intentionally released the globes on the advancing army. That would be a great reedit. To bad Lucas doesn't re-edit his films..rimshot.
Beside all Jar-Jar wants is a freakin bowl of Trix. . .
-- The Kruger Dunning explains most post on/. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
Re:The man deserves it
by
ElectricPoppy
·
· Score: 1
I liked it too. I don't generally like Spielberg as a director, but I did like that movie. Though, I wish Kubrick had been able to do it - it would have been really awesome in that case...
Re:The man deserves it
by
fucksl4shd0t
·
· Score: 2, Insightful
Look, I don't really like Jar-Jar either, but there's a little more going on in the Phantom Menace than the introduction of Anakin Skywalker.
First and foremost, the story in the Phantom Menace is about Naboo, the Queen, and some cultural changes that need to take place for them to keep their independence. Sure, we watch the movie and know that it's only a small episode in the grand scheme of things, and that what's really important in this movie is the introduction of Darth Vader, the beginning of his relationship with Obi-Wan, and the return of the Sith to the Republic.
Hate Jar-Jar all you want, but hate the game, not the player. Jar-Jar's purpose in the flick was to bring the Naboo and the Gungans together to beat a mutual enemy, and the cultural changes that happen on Naboo as a result are fundamental and important.
I actually like the Phantom Menace, but in order to watch it I have to hypnotize myself into thinking I'm 8 years old. But other than that, I find it's a decent flick. But a "flick" is exactly what it is. How good or bad either of the first two episodes are will be determined by the third episode.
It's a tremendous achievement
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
to not only give birth to Jar-Jar Binks (ok folks, I don't really want to imagine it either), but to also make a shitload of money with it.
Kudos to Lucas for that achievement.
Re:It's a tremendous achievement
by
koh
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Okay, okay, so why isn't it called the "shitload of money achievement" ? Would be more to the point, don't you think ?:)
-- Karma cannot be described by words alone.
Re:It's a tremendous achievement
by
ScrewMaster
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
In that case Bill Gates would have been winning it every year, hands down. But since Bill Gates' lifetime achievement can be summed up in one word: "Windows", the statue or whatever goes to Lucas instead.
-- The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
-- By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
Re:OK
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I don't know much about the awards, but if it's based on on movies alone he doesn't deserve it. But if it considers his contribution to cinema as a whole, then that's another matter. Consider all the work ILM has done in other movies, the framework he laid out for merchandising, the role of THX certification, etc. IMO the guy had two good movies in him (Star Wars and Empire), but the effects of those film across the industry may warrant an award like this.
Oh, I don't know, maybe because he CREATED FRIGGIN' STAR WARS!
I don't mean to sound like a troll, but people, come on! Whether or not you like what he's done with Star Wars recently, you can't deny that he created one of the greatest series of movies of all time. If it wasn't, we wouldn't constantly have people whining about every tiny change Lucas makes to his movies, would we?
Re:OK
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Loved your MSN rant, and I can only agree.
Yeah but...
by
mstefanus
·
· Score: 1, Interesting
I will make no other comment
No comment is also a comment...
Re:Yeah but...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Oooh, deep!
If a comment is posted in the woods and no-one is there to witness it - does someone still shout "First Post!"?
past winners
by
Pompatus
·
· Score: 5, Informative
According to MSN Encarta (hey, it was the first one I found on a google search) these are the past winners of the AFI Lifetime achievement award.
1973 John Ford
1974 James Cagney
1975 Orson Welles
1976 William Wyler
1977 Bette Davis
1978 Henry Fonda
1979 Alfred Hitchcock
1980 James Stewart
1981 Fred Astaire
1982 Frank Capra
1983 John Huston
1984 Lillian Gish
1985 Gene Kelly
1986 Billy Wilder
1987 Barbara Stanwyck
1988 Jack Lemmon
1989 Gregory Peck
1990 Sir David Lean
1991 Kirk Douglas
1992 Sidney Poitier
1993 Elizabeth Taylor
1994 Jack Nicholson
1995 Steven Spielberg
1996 Clint Eastwood
1997 Martin Scorsese
1998 Robert Wise
1999 Dustin Hoffman
2000 Harrison Ford
2001 Barbra Streisand
2002 Tom Hanks
2003 Robert De Niro
2004 Meryl Streep
There are some pretty serious names on that list. My point is, why now? The nostalgia for the first trilogy of films is good and all, but really, they were only 3 movies.
--
---- Squirrel... It's not just for breakfast anymore
Re:past winners
by
TheKidWho
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
I am not angry because he fucked with the trilogy. I am pissed because he just doesn't belong on that list.
Re:past winners
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Wrt your signature, you've got a superfluous apostrophe there.
it's = it is, i.e. "There's a village in Texas missing it is idiot."
Re:past winners
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Because Jews run Hollywood. I don't mean that as a troll, it is human nature to take care of your own. You'll notice a startling lack of blacks on the list, or in Hollywood in general. Film simply isn't the media they chose to operate in, or are unable to penetrate to a representative degree.
Because Jews run Hollywood. I don't mean that as a troll,
I'm sorry, but how could that possibly be anything other than a troll?
If you'd said that there was a good number of Jewish actors and other film professionals in Hollywood, then that would be a reasoned argument. A slightly inflammatory one, and one whose truth I've no information on, but reasonable nonetheless. But a ludicrous, sweeping overgeneralisation and naive oversimplification like that? Do me a favour.
A more rational point might be that if a good proportion of actors and directors were Jewish, then you might expect a similar proportion of the very talented ones, and hence of the award-winning ones. And a similar argument might apply to the low proportion of African-Americans (or whatever the current politically-correct term is -- I'm from a different continent, so I don't know). But since I've no real (i.e. not just anecdoral) information about the ethnic and/or religious demographic of film professionals -- and neither, I suspect, have you -- then this is all academic.
Sadly, that's been pretty much crapped on by the fact that the last movie to bear his name was truly abysmal (and yes, I'm well aware of the fact that wasn't his fault but sadly that will be forgotten)
-- Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
There are some pretty serious names on that list. My point is, why now? The nostalgia for the first trilogy of films is good and all, but really, they were only 3 movies.
It isn't just the films, it's everything else. ILM, Skywalker Sound - hell, even Pixar was at one point a Lucas deal.
Forget Star Wars - he's done a lot to the industry as a tool-maker. Oh, and a merchandiser:p
-- Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
Are you referring to A.I. or Eyes Wide Shut? In either case, why? I've only seen the latter, and while it wasn't... umm... eye-opening, it wasn't the worst movie I've ever seen either. (Mediocre, yeah.)
Eyes Wide Shut. A truly terrible movie. It's sole redeeming feature was Nicole Kidman taking her clothes off. I expect far better things from anything carrying Kubrick's name, and it's sad to say that this is the last movie that he is credited as having directed.
By contrast, I rather enjoyed A.I. - more surprising since Spielberg never really "did it" for me as a director.
-- Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
If you look closely it actually appears that Han and Greedy (err, Lucas) win the award almost simultaneously.
-- Use Ctrl-C instead of ESC in Vim!
Well deserved
by
AndrewStephens
·
· Score: 5, Informative
Much as we all enjoy reading about how Lucus raped your childhood, his movies are probably only a small part of why he is getting this award. The man is directly responsible for much of the technology behind modern film making - nonlinear editing, sound post-production and reproduction, digital effects, virtual sets, virtual extras, and now he is a leading force in digital film. Not to mention the great strides he made in marketing and licensing:) All these techniques were developed for his projects, and there is not a film made today that does not use them in some way. He is certainly more deserving than 2001's winner - Barbra Streisand!
-- sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
Okay, so we've established that Lucas has 'raised the bar' and made it much, much, more expensive for someone with a great dramatic idea to get his/her vision onto the screen and before the public. Kinda the equivalent of what's happened in popular music, where you've gotta make a twelve million dollar 'video' before your music can become a hit.
There is a significant part of the film community that doesn't see a causal link between technical and artist achievement. Many actually see the relative surge in the use of SFX as determintal to cinema. After all blue screen, CGI and digital worlds are just tools. Tools that can be used to create a masterpiece (Citizen Kane has a similar amount of effect shots as Star Wars, yet you wouldn't know) or create a Michael Bay film. I would also like you to consider a timeline of special effects, in many cases Lucas wasn't the conceiver, but the populariser.
I respect and appreciate the technical strides that Lucas took. Hell, I am enough of a geek to be here. However the AFI doesn't give technical awards, but artist awards. Cultural impact aside, I firmly believe Lucas isn't worthy of such an award.
Just an opinion of a film nerd. I am the guy who writes essays on the link between R2D2 and characters in Akira Kurosawa films. Disagree if you must, and many will.
Okay, so we've established that Lucas has 'raised the bar' and made it much, much, more expensive for someone with a great dramatic idea to get his/her vision onto the screen and before the public.
Tell me how you get The Lord of the Rings on film without using the techniques pioneered by Lucas.
I rendered The Lord of the Rings from actual source code, in my head, by reading the original novels in a hammock in the back yard in the summer of 1974.
No animated, CGI, or acted out product I've seen or heard of can do justice for that.
As to why I would want it on film? Hmmm. . . The printed book would be less easy to read on microfiche. ..
Wrong, now he has confirmation he needs to pursue episodes VII, VIII, and IX. No, as a lifetime achievement award winner, no one will question his decision to rework the triology so that Han Solo's name is actually Beau, and in episode VII we learn that Beau and Luke are cousins, and Han's long lost father returns, Uncle Jessie. The empire is defeated, but pockets of control remain throughout the galaxy, especially on the planet of Hazzard. Here Beau and Luke, the newly named Dukes of Hazzard, are sent to eliminate the remaining emperial forces. Lando, will of course have taken the Millenium Falcon, but that's ok because Beau will reveal that he has been working on a supped up ship, named after one of the great hearo's of the rebel resistance, the General Lee. Finally the Star Wars vision, the Lucas vision, can be realized.
Oh... and I've heard in episode VIII Beau and Luke will run into a group of wrongly accused ex-rebel fighters, named Murdoch, Hannibal, Face, and B.A. Barachus. I pity the fool who misses this movie!
And finally, we might see N-Sync do a cameo in the movie (that would be awesome d00d).
Re:Good
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
You BASTARD! All of my childhood memories are being devoured by this foul man and his evil vision. He must be stopped!
[Returning from commercial break to see Imperial Star Destroyer chasing Millennium Falcon with large number painted on the side]
Right, now where were we? Well, when we left off, Beau and Luke had got theirself into a whole heap o' trouble!
Re:Yeah, Lucas is a hack...
by
Dancin_Santa
·
· Score: 2, Funny
Why not? All you need is a pen. Don't let the condensation hold you back!
Re:Yeah, Lucas is a hack...
by
Dirtside
·
· Score: 1
Are you implying that because we haven't directed billions of dollars' worth of movies, we don't have a right to criticize the AFI's choice? Or Lucas's actions or motivations?
-- "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
Re:Yeah, Lucas is a hack...
by
Perdition
·
· Score: 1
Kinda. It's not an Actions and Motivations award, it's a Film-Making award. He's made films, several in fact. Did it most of his life. Lifetime acheivement of making films. Here's an award. Besides, when I apparently called people's creativity into question, I didn't mean YOU, I meant THEM. YOU, however, are exempt from the comment. Don't ever confuse THEM with YOU.
-- Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
Re:Yeah, Lucas is a hack...
by
Tackhead
·
· Score: 3, Funny
> but what have YOU done?
Throughout my entire life, I was able not to create Jar Jar Binks.
Unless, of course, YOU are one of THEM. In which case, feel free to confuse yourself. That will give the rest of US time to finalise our plots to remove THEM from the positions of power which they hold.
-- Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
Re:Yeah, Lucas is a hack...
by
Perdition
·
· Score: 1
Heyyyy...
Is that YOU?
-- Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
Re:Yeah, Lucas is a hack...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
And I thank god every day of my life. One is one too many.
It's all about special effects...
by
pedantic+bore
·
· Score: 4, Informative
If you RTFA, you'll see that what is being recognized is primarily Lucas's pioneering work in special effects: ILM, Pixar, Lucas Sound, etc. The man might not know how to direct his way out of a paper bag, and his ear for dialog went deaf about twenty years ago, but he has created some wonderful tools for other directors/writers to use. He deserves something for that.
-- Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
Re:It's all about special effects...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I beg to differ. Have you seen THX-1138? American Graffiti? He knows how to direct... I don't know what his problem is recently. Maybe the computer stuff has made it too easy for him?
...as the story rolled off the bottom of the slashdot front page.
wait a sec, does this mean hes bout to die now?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
i am longing for even more star wars movies?
when will the sequels (read: episode 7,8,9) finally apprear. he once even thought about a quadruple trilogy, so there is even room for episodes 10,11 and 12....
damn, the star wars universe is so great, only there are all these books and novels for the post-episode-6 era now, and i doubt it, that lucas gonna make movies out of the books of his "competitors" or fellow authors who got accepted into the vast star wars universe and expanded it even further...
although the timothy zahn books (also a trilogy) which take place after episode-6 in the star wars universe timeline and many other authors have added valuable material, stories and character so the star wars universe.
i could really make up my mind, if i would be in favor of lucas making completely new films (his ideas from the past, as he has originally planned 3time 3episodes) or if lucas (or somebody else) should take all these fine books and make some more and never-ending films and adaptations....
star wars would be the place/universe to live in.
afterall there is a famous saying: -- "Reality is truly stranger than fiction; Probably why fiction is so popular"
Thank God...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
for Trey Parker and Matt Stone! They've managed to save at least one part of my childhood from senseless defilement. Where the fuck is their award?
American Graffiti
by
httpamphibio.us
·
· Score: 4, Informative
I'm constantly surprised that George Lucas was lucid and creative enough to create American Graffiti... it's a film that has not only withstood the test of time, quite an achievement for what could have easily been just a nostalgia piece, but has the perfect balance of comedy and drama, and manages to develop many different storylines (most multi-threaded films tend to skimp on any sort of real character and story development and the crossover between storylines is often very poor).
-- sig.
Maybe "lifetime" is the wrong word...
by
Daniel+Ellard
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I liked THX1138 a lot. American Graffiti was great. Star Wars 4-6: when they came out, people were amazed. The Indiana Jones still looks good (well, except for maybe the last one).
That's quite a successful run. Maybe not a "lifetime" of achievement, but a bunch of great and/or insanely popular movies in a short period of time.
It's unfortunate that the recent stuff sucks, but he's still got a pretty amazing record.
-- Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
Re:Maybe "lifetime" is the wrong word...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
When Peter Jackson hits 60 years old, he's going to have an even better record than Lucas.
Plus, he's not a anal revisionist bitch like Lucas.
"George Lucas is receiving the AFI Lifetime Achievement award. I will make no other comment."
Oh, c'mon, don't like that. You'll get yours too, eventually!
Re:Who needs a hug?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
"Are you here to give me my Lifetime Achievement Award" ?
"SORT OF".
Give credit where credit is due!
by
Archimonde
·
· Score: 1, Flamebait
1)He created original trilogy. Those movies are one of the best movies ever.
2)He destroyed it with Special Edition.
3)Then he created three crappy prequels*. (worst movies ever).
And now the conclusion:
Thats helluva lot of determinination and hard work. He deserves it.
* I never saw episode iii, but judging from i and ii, I'm almost certanly right;)
-- Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
Re:Give credit where credit is due!
by
Moderatbastard
·
· Score: 0
Those movies are one of the best movies ever.
And you are the stupidest bunch of 'tards on slashdot.
-- 1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
Re:Give credit where credit is due!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Mods, parent's post isn't flamebait.
Parent forgot <sarcasm> tag.
Yes it is
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 1, Funny
Getting millions of people to pay bucks to watch Jar-Jar _IS_ an achievement.
Luck?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It's LotR in space. His luck is that he got there first, and managed to work out some of the important parts, lightsabers for instance. It was something from his youth or college (LotR), combined with something topical (our future in space), and told in a storytelling style familiar too him (serials).
I'm not dismissing his contribution, or insight, but Star Wars was as much a product of it's time as it was of Lucas's vision.
It really was his one great idea, and he managed to, with the help of Speilberg, recreate some of it in Indiana Jones, but Lucas has always been chasing another Star Wars, and it's pretty clear there is nothing genuine left in him.
episode 3 aint there yet
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
... thats why you havent seen it yet.
it will be really sad to see the star wars universe grind to a halt when ep3 will be finally screening, cos unless lucas decides to change his mind, it seems that there wont be any more episodes (in contrast to his promis in the past decades, that his idea of starwars was a three or even four time trilogy).
but i want to have episodes 7-9 at least, best would be episodes 7-12 and even more....
please georgie-boy, will ya? thanks.
Short sighted posters
by
damieng
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
As always a story brings out the most short sighted posters, upset over the treatment of Star Wars.
Lets not forget that the award is not for Star Wars but for his achievements to the industry.
Lucas helped found ILM which helped get special effects to the what they are today. Skywalker Sound has contributed to hundreds of films. THX certification got cinemas, film and DVD production quality up.
True. The man completely fucked StarWars, but still has a number of remarkable films on his resume. I personally *love* the Indiana Jones series.
Re:Short sighted posters
by
MtViewGuy
·
· Score: 1
Surprisingly, I actually liked Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade as the best of the Indiana Jones movies. I think it's because of the superb interaction between Harrison Ford and Sean Connery.
He's done more for the business of movies
by
hargettp
·
· Score: 4, Insightful
Yet perhaps not so much for the art of movies. Alas, because I enjoyed the original trilogy so much in my childhood.
He created one of the greatest (and first, I believe) movie merchandizing businesses in history. I would question whether there would be so many "Power Ranger Toys" or "Barney" tie-ins if the Star Wars franchise hadn't done been so successful.
He has continually expanded the frontier of digital effects in film-making, and although in recent years his studio's work has been eclipsed by other films (e.g., The Matrix, Shrek, Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, etc.), I do believe that nevertheless he deserves credit for the push towards effective uses of digital imagery in cinema.
He has enhanced the audio experience in most large cinemas in operation today (at least in the US). I can't say how many times I've seen "THX-1138" digital surround sound by Dolby--that sound system was developed in conjunction with Lucas' team.
He was first to expand the idea of film sequels (and series) in modern cinema. Would we have had Die Hard, Die Harder were it not for Lucas? Would we have The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, The Matrix Revolutions were it not for Lucas? What about Star Trek the Movie I-IV? Back to the Future I-II? If the original trilogy had not been so popular with audiences, would subsequent sequels & series concepts have been developed other major film studios?
There may be other such achievements as well, but with the above I think there is a strong case that Lucas reshaped how the business of movies does it's business.
Re:He's done more for the business of movies
by
rdean400
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
although in recent years his studio's work has been eclipsed by other films (e.g., The Matrix, Shrek, Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow).
I would dispute that.
Pixar really plays to different market segments than Lucas's films, so they haven't really eclipsed Lucas's work. (And to be fair, Pixar itself started out as a division of Lucasfilm, Ltd. It was purchased by Steve Jobs for $10mil in 1986 and rechristened "Pixar".). No Pixar = no Toy Story, and no Toy Story means we probably wouldn't have seen a good wholly computer animated picture yet.
ILM was the special effects studio for Sky Captain and the World fo Tomorrow, so Lucas's company was part of that one.
That leaves the Matrix. Although bullet time generated more buzz than massively digitally created armies of Phantom Menace, it's about equivalent on the revolutionary scale. Matrix got perceived as better by having a more well-executed story.
The fact is engraved into Pixar's HQ: "No amount of technology can turn a bad story into a good one" (Although TPM and AOTC were good stories, poorly told).
Re:He's done more for the business of movies
by
Snaller
·
· Score: 1
Would we have The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, The Matrix Revolutions were it not for Lucas?
He has a lot to answer for!
-- If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
Re:He's done more for the business of movies
by
donglekey
·
· Score: 1
ILM was the special effects studio for Sky Captain and the World fo Tomorrow, so Lucas's company was part of that one.
No they were not. They may have done a handful of shots but half the movie was completed by a studio set up for this movie called WOT and half were completed by many other studios included Ring of Fire, Orphanage, Stan Winston Digital, Pacific Title, and probably others.
Re:He's done more for the business of movies
by
rdean400
·
· Score: 1
True, but the supervisor of the whole thing is Scott Anderson, an ILM alumnus.
We'll Ignore...
by
a_peckover
·
· Score: 5, Insightful
...the parts where he revolutionised film making (THX, Skywalker Sound, ILM, non-linear editing) and where he became the most successful independent film-maker of all time.
Important Stuff
# Please try to keep posts on topic.
# Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
# Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
# Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
# Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
I absolutely agree.
by
MtViewGuy
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
I mean think about it:
1. Industrial Light and Magic essentially pioneered the modern age of cinematic special effects. They took "traditional" special effects to new levels of excellence and helped pioneer CGI effects for movies.
2. Pixar pioneered much of what computer animation can do, and under subsequent leadership of Steve Jobs the company has produced several blockbuster hit movies.
3. Lucas Sound helped develop the THX certification for high quality movie presentation in the theaters, and it has extended that certification to DVD mastering, too. A THX-certified DVD tends to have high-quality picture and sound on average.
A THX-certified DVD tends to have high-quality picture and sound on average.
Right. Snow White in Ultra-Hiss Mono got a THX certification. It's something that's more easily bought than earned these days. Likewise, non-THX certified equipment can and often does perform better than their certified counterparts.
The best thing to come out of THX is that THX sound at the beginning of the movie;)
Actually, THX certification for DVD's is more than just better quality sound. It's also better quality picture during the mastering process, too. That's the reason why THX-certified DVD's tend to look quite good on average.
the subtitle
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0, Insightful
Lifetime achievement for most money made while ignoring the fans who keep forking over more money no matter how much he insults them.
This is embarassing
by
HarveyBirdman
·
· Score: 0, Flamebait
Not the award going to Lucas, but the ignorant asshole brigade here who seem to think the beginning and end of Lucas' contribution to the film industry is Star Wars.You might want to venture out of the house today and purchase a sack of clues somewhere.
And enough about the special edition whining. Yes, he altered your ppreeeeciousssssss, and this somehow ruined your childhood. If your childhood memories were that fragile and inordinately foccused on a fluffy sci-fi flick, well, maybe they deserved a solid kick in the balls.
-- ---
Ban humanity.
Re:This is embarassing
by
inkswamp
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
Give it up. I've tried modding some of the outright flamebaitery where posters call Lucas every filthy word in the book and every time I do it, I get meta-modded as "unfair." There is a massive amount of anti-Star Wars venom on Slashdot (hell, this post will likely get modded as "troll" at some point too.)
Some folks around here have taken to hating Lucas with a sort of religious zeal and nothing you can say will change that. I grew up with Star Wars as a massive component of my life, and I think the new versions of the films kick the old versions' asses up and down the street a half-dozen times. But some people around here disagree and won't tolerate opposing points of view. Frankly, I think it's a little unhealthy to get so wrapped up in this stuff that you allow it to affect your emotions and judgment to that extent.
HarveyBirddman, if you want to engage in more mature and meaningful discourse about the films, go to The Force.net and try out their fan forums. Much more respectful and knowledgeable and level-headed group there and it's not as Lucas-worshipping as you might at first assume (plenty of valid critiques of Lucas there without the emotional outpouring and the wailing about ruined childhoods.)
Honestly, I don't know why Slashdot insists that this stuff should be posted here anymore. Clearly, the Slashdot crowd and the Star Wars fan do not overlap much nowadays.
-- --Rick
"If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
Re:This is embarassing
by
HarveyBirdman
·
· Score: 1
They should look at the new version of THX-1138. If there ever was an argument FOR making updates to older films, that one is it. Very nice "upgrades" in that one. Just enough to give a better sense of scale in a few scenes.
-- ---
Ban humanity.
good?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Populair movies. POPULAIR.
he didnt make no freakkin schindlers list.
I will make no other comment
by
smchris
·
· Score: 1
THX1138 was an excellent movie.
The distributors spat on it at the time.
Considering his subsequent work, I've always figured you want the definition of "embittered cynic" you look up George Lucas.
Retiring is Easy.
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
That's what the State Farm advertisement said when I checked the article. Christ, I couldn't have said it better, myself. it's time for Georgiepoo to retire. Sooner is better than later.
Halt the pathogen at it's source; don't just treat the symptoms.
Chills and shakes when I hear it.
by
tallbill
·
· Score: 1
That kind of monumental and over-composed style of music also gives me shakes.
I guess that the music is OK, but I am very sick of it.
"PI" is the example you are looking for!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
If you've not seen "PI", get it. B&W, deals with mathematics (naturally, but not on a level that will leave you scratchin' your head...well, you are reading/., so it shouldn't), and a great flick. The soundtrack, while not necessary is quite nice.
I felt a great disturbance in the force...
by
TheOnlyJuztyn
·
· Score: 1, Insightful
... as if millions of _real_, skilled directors cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced...
It's like telling him, until now, you've done everything worthy in your life, please, leave StarWars alone. Don't touch it anymore!
-- DON'T PANIC
And don't forget..
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
.. he invented the Internet!
Lifetime Achievement?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
What lifetime achievement? Achievement of brainwashing the masses with his despotic agenda? Sorry for a rant... I have already written about it. It will probably be modded down in no time, just because it is not a trendy thing to say here, but what the hell...
Isn't "Star Wars" good old fashioned sci-fi? Harmless fun? Some people call it "eye candy" -- a chance to drop back into childhood and punt your adult cares away for two hours, dwelling in a lavish universe where good and evil are vividly drawn, without all the inconvenient counterpoint distinctions that clutter daily life.
Got a problem? Cleave it with a light saber! Wouldn't you love -- just once in your life -- to dive a fast little ship into your worst enemy's stronghold and set off a chain reaction, blowing up the whole megillah from within its rotten core while you streak away to safety at the speed of light? (It's such a nifty notion that it happens in three out of four "Star Wars" flicks.)
One of the problems with so-called light entertainment today is that somehow, amid all the gaudy special effects, people tend to lose track of simple things, like story and meaning. They stop noticing the moral lessons the director is trying to push. Yet these things matter.
By now it's grown clear that George Lucas has an agenda, one that he takes very seriously. After four "Star Wars" films, alarm bells should have gone off, even among those who don't look for morals in movies. When the chief feature distinguishing "good" from "evil" is how pretty the characters are, it's a clue that maybe the whole saga deserves a second look.
Just what bill of goods are we being sold, between the frames?
- Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow. - "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability. - Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough. - True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited. - Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.
That is just the beginning of a long list of "moral" lessons relentlessly pushed by "Star Wars." Lessons that starkly differentiate this saga from others that seem superficially similar, like "Star Trek." (We'll take a much closer look at some stark divergences between these two sci-fi universes below.)
Above all, I never cared for the whole Nietzschian Übermensch thing: the notion -- pervading a great many myths and legends -- that a good yarn has to be about demigods who are bigger, badder and better than normal folk by several orders of magnitude. It's an ancient storytelling tradition based on abiding contempt for the masses -- one that I find odious in the works of A.E. Van Vogt, E.E. Smith, L. Ron Hubbard and wherever you witness slanlike super-beings deciding the fate of billions without ever pausing to consider their wishes.
Wow, you say. If I feel that strongly about this, why just a week-long boycott? Why see the latest "Star Wars" film at all?
Because I am forced to admit that demigod tales resonate deeply in the human heart.
In "The Hero With a Thousand Faces," Joseph Campbell showed how a particular, rhythmic storytelling technique was used in almost every ancient and pre-modern culture, depicting protagonists and antagonists with certain consistent motives and character traits, a pattern that transcended boundaries of language and culture. In these classic tales, the hero begins reluctant, yet signs and portents foretell his pre-ordained greatness. He receives dire warnings and sage wisdom from a mentor, acquires quirky-but-faithful companions, faces a series of steepening crises, explores the pit of his own fears and emerges triumphant to bring some boon/talisman/victory home to his admiring tribe/people/nation.
By offering valuable insights into this revered storytelling tradition, Joseph Campbell did indeed shed light on common spiritua
Re:Lifetime Achievement?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Not trendy to bash Star Wars on Slashdot? Who are you kidding? but i think you need to take a deep breath and start focusing on getting a girlfriend.
AFI?
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Association of Fucking Idiots?
Maybe I was too harsh...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
First a clarification. While I do think that plenty of evidence shows that George Lucas hates a civilization that's been very good to him... and that his storytelling faults are innumerable... this does not mean that I'm saying everything in the Star Wars universe is evil and perverse! (See below where I praise Luke Skywalker and especially Han Solo.) So many people would not flock to the films if there weren't many positive traits. The Campbellian and Enlightenment traditions can have considerable overlap -- despite their struggle at deeper levels. Among the better (though simpleminded) lessons that you do see in even the worst Star Wars films are -- "Mean people suck," "Be brave," "Be steadfast to your friends," "Try to stay calm," and "Keep on trying."
Indeed, I have never said we should eliminate Joseph Campbell-type myths from our storytelling heritage! When they are good, they rock. Anyway, they are deeply rooted inside us, for well or ill. I just think we ought to TRY to grow up a bit and appreciate other modes of fiction that are less cliched, formulaic, predictable, and obeissant to elites.
For the Campbellian myth can VERY easily go wrong, and turn into a nightmare. That's what has happened to George Lucas's particular vision, in which a "rebellion" is used to symbolize the legitimization of divine rule by demigods. And it's gotten worse the more seriously Lucas takes himself, from the idealism and simple hopefulness of Movie #1 (A New Hope) to the dismal futility of the recent Phantom Menace. (See point #1 below.) Over the long run, we're going to have to face these matters, so why not get down to it now?
For those of you just starting out, I do seriously recommend you go first to the two web sites posted at the top of this page. You'll be much better equipped to see why the points that follow (below) are relevant.
The most common email I received from Lucas defenders was to attack a single perceived flaw in the part of my article dealing with The Phantom Menace itself -- zeroing in on my complaint regarding the nature of the master scheme by Senator Palpatine... to use the crisis on his homeworld to manipulate his own rise to power. The people who raised this point avoided commenting on any of the major issues I raised -- e.g., Lucas's elitism, the "demigod mythos," or GL's openly expressed antipathy toward democratic western civilization. Instead, they cried "gotcha!" -- as if my failure to grasp Palpatine's scheme invalidates every other point I tried to raise.
My answer is simple. Of COURSE I saw that Palpatine was using the invasion of Naboo to engineer his accession as Chancellor, by getting his cousin, the Queen, to denouce the old (good) Chancellor. I just couldn't credit that the whole thing could be so stupid.
Consider these questions:
* If the queen's so influential, able to topple the head of a galaxy, why was she earlier unable to get any help from all these political allies she's calling upon?
* Um, so what's to keep the shamed-defeated Trade Federation guys from later on screaming "It was Palpatine! He MADE us doo eet!" The fact that the Sith Lord's eyes were in shadow? They really know nothing about a guy they've sworn fealty to and staked everything on? Some savvy traders!
* Palpatine is clearly concerned about being hunted down by the Jedi, right? Yet he draws their newly-roused attention right to his own home planet? He couldn't have used another?
* Oh, and why does he send Maul to kill Amidala and her escorts on Tatooine, when they are bringing her to the Senate to do exactly what he wants her to do? Does that make even marginal sense? (In fact, he'd send a space yacht to pick her up and escort her to the Senate in style, while keeping Darth Maul secret a while longer.) Now that we get right down to it, Palpatine WANTS Amidala to escape from Naboo. Or he should. If Lucas bothered to plot at all.
* Oh, the scheme is dumb about forty other ways. But above all, the "success" of Palpatine's plan makes t
AFI Sucks
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
AFI is just about the shittiest band out there.
And what is lucas getting a "lifetime achievement award" for? All he's really done is 50 versions of the same Star Wars movie (original, digitally enhanced, audio enhanced, remade, etc etc) plus ET. He really hasn't done much and what he has done has been half-assed crap like Star Wars (which I still feel is boring and ridiculous - it's not THAT great, guys - grow up).
... to get a lifetime achievement award if your constantly allowed to go back, digitially edit, and resubmit your life's work for approval until you get it write (or wrong i guess).
Re:Its not so hard...
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I delivered a much justified smackdown. Blow my thick, hard chubby before going back to masturbating over your fanboy altars.
-- ---
Ban humanity.
Re:Fuck you, negative mods
by
inkswamp
·
· Score: 1
LOL! Damn, that's great! You have a great attitude. I just wish the people around here with moderation points would actually look at the context of what you wrote before modding it as flamebait.
Anyway, we're right behind you. Lead us onward, HarveyBirdman, into the depths of Incorrectly Modded Flamebait Hell! BWAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!
-- --Rick
"If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
In my version:
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
The award presenter shoots first.
Awful Films
by
BlackHawk-666
·
· Score: 1, Flamebait
I've just finished watching his lifetime achivement for the first time as an adult, and I can honestly say it sucks and blows arse. Sure, he deserves credit for the fantastic THX quality of the films, that sound and imagery really was top drawer. It's a pity the films themselves stank so badly. Let me qualify my main gripes with them.
In Star Wars, Luke comes off as some petualant child who went to the sooky child school of acting. If was hard to get involved with his badly written character, and Han Solo come off as some sort of space hick. The only redeeming feature was a bra-less princess Laia.
Whilst watching the truly awful Return of the Jedi, I noticed that the characters seem to say all their actions and speak in pure exposition e.g. I'm going to go *there* and do *that*. This film is worse than pantomime.
Give George credit where credit is due, THX is great, the special effects are fab, but the acting, plot, and characters all stink.
-- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Re:Awful Films
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
i can't believe you actually took time to type all that. why do you care? go outside.
I don't know. I really liked his segment in The Four Rooms.
-- Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
Achievements in sound, editing, effects work....
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
For f*cks sake grow up and stop moaning about the 'raping of your childhood'.
Beyond Star Wars, Lucas and his team have pioneered the fields of non-linear editing, optical and digital visual effects, computer generated imagery, sound editing/mixing/recording and many other fields that have contributed *directly* to the cinema.
THX sound systems for cinema and home. Skywalker Sound. Industrial Light + Magic. The Pixar computer.
Heck even Photoshop started there as 'Display', before becoming 'ImagePro' and then 'Photoshop' c/o Thomas Knoll.
I could go on, but I know I'll be buried under people doing their so called 'funny' and 'insightful' comments about Jar Jar and childhood-raping...
Achievement
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
Sure, making three separate releases of the same movie, in three different ways, is an achievement. Sort of like the 'great victory' King Pyrrhus achieved.
Not considering his role in the second movie
by
SuperKendall
·
· Score: 1
Look, I hated Jar Jar's pratfals in the first movie as much as the next guy.
But in the second movie the stupidity had a point - he was an easy to use pawn, one of the weak minded people that is so easily manipulted by force powers. I was actually quite happy with how Jar Jar was used in teh second, even though I thought they went way overboard with the physical comedy in the first.
The whole *point* is that he's stupid, not that he's hated. He'll end up being hated (or pitied) because he's so stupid.
-- "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Many of the editing techniques, and special effects done today are possible because of his drive and commentment.
you can say what you want about ther Star Wars series, but they did influence the industry. The way movie companies viewed sci-fi films after Star-Wars was a lot more seriously then before Star-Wars. WOuld Alien as been as good if George hadn't proved there is a market for 'grity' sci-fi?
-- The Kruger Dunning explains most post on/. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
Only three movies
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
THX1138 American Graffiti Star Wars Trilogy Indiana Jones Trilogy
Not bad. American Graffiti in particular seems to be overlooked. It really captured a certain feeling of a time and place; was funny and engaging.
After Star Wars, he moved from directing to producing. That was the change. But everyone gets older. He deserves the achievement award.
He'd stop making movies on par with the Cabage Patch Kids. I'm not worried about my childhood memories, I'd really like to see him make a movie with the imagination of an adult. These dumbed down Star Wars movies have been thinner then a childrens cartoon and all the while the real world has continued grow more complex. Give me a Star Wars with characters with flaws. Something to sink my teeth into.
-- Quack, quack.
you would think
by
geekoid
·
· Score: 2, Interesting
that a place that alledgedly devoted to 'News for Nerds' would appriacte this a lot more.
1) Made Sci-fi movies Mainstream 2) Set ground work for technology to make better sci-fi movies 3) Created the most Kick ass Sci-fi movie of it's time. 4) Independant film maker
What's with the haters? Quite frankly this 'it's big and worth a lot of money so lets hate it attitude has gotten old.' Except for Google. Speak bad about Google and you'll be moderated down to hell.
-- The Kruger Dunning explains most post on/. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
1) Made Sci-fi movies Mainstream 2) Set ground work for technology to make better sci-fi movies 3) Created the most Kick ass Sci-fi movie of it's time. 4) Independant film maker
You forgot:
5) PROFIT!
(disclaimer: I've loved Lucas' work since THX1138, and think he deserves the award. But this is Slashdot, and the rules clearly state that All Lists Must End With Profit)
-- Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
I can't believe how two or three little changes can "destroy" a movie. I enjoyed the original saga, and even if Greedo shoots a split-second earlier, I think the restoration and improvements that have been made to image quality (e.g. lightsabres) are worth it.
Lifetime Achievement Award for Sodomizing Our Memories?
Star Wars *used* to be good.
star wars == young childhood memories distrorted
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
this award is going to a person who made some cheesy movies that made some serious money.
We judge him by how much money he made.
slashdot geeks, is star wars really worth talking about anymore? Obviously todays news is pretty sad, otherwsie i would skip this post.
I would rather watch a black and white charlie chaplin film and see revolutinary special effects.
Not this guy 80 years later.
The "Harry Knowles" syndrome
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
I feel so sorry for fanboys that grew up watching Episodes 4, 5, and 6 and thinking how "kewl" it was "A long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away", but then grew up and think Episodes 1, 2, and 3 suck. I'm a fan of the 4, 5, and 6 (especially "Empire"), but you know, 1, 2, and 3 really are the same quality as 4 and 6... all 6 movies were made for 12 year old males, not the 30-year old geeks we are now.
What can I say... That's just your opinion, and if you have a hard time accepting others, feeling the need to look down on others, you're just narrow-minded.
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
-- Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
Re:quote
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
Re:quote
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
Enough with all the SW bashing
by
magicRob
·
· Score: 0
It's getting old... just like Lucas' beard... I wonder if he was born with it...
But seriously, he did a couple of good things.
- Gave us Indy and Young Indy and palmed it off to Spielberg to do something good with. - Gave us Pixar and sold that off, which eventually ended up with Mr Jobs and a fantastic little animation movie studio.
Notice how everything he gets rid of turns to Gold
-- Join the Digital TV discussion @ http://forums.dvbowners.com
Come out of the tinfoil hats...
by
Machitis
·
· Score: 1
If you take a moment to remove the tinfoil hat and take a look at what Lucas has done... I'd say he deserves it. His methods as far as hollywood politics alone revolutionized the industry of movie-making.
Beside that, he's led development of some of the best industry departments and standards out there. He was largely responsible for Pixar!
So before you're too quick to bash him for the obvious blunders he's had, at least have the fairness to recognize what he has really done well.
Actually, I'm also up for that award!
by
Anonymous Coward
·
· Score: 0
It's really quite an honour.
I've been deficating in books, on works of art,sculptures, scores of music, etc... for years! I didn't think anyone would actually appreciate my efforts.
Thank goodness there are awards for everything now'a'days... although, all of my mischief pales in comparison to Lucas (that f*#ker s*!ts on everything he can); he'll probably win it in a walk.
Oh well, there's always next year. I hear Bush will be nominated.
No, that's entirely my point - that I don't want him to be judged on Eyes Wide Sh*t - far from it. BUT I live in the real world, and sadly a lot of people WILL judge him on EWS - it's very, very wrong, but that's the way it is.
There's an old adage - "When you get something right, nobody remembers. When you get something wrong, nobody forgets.". In this case, somebody else got it wrong, but it's Kubrick's name that's on there.
I consider Kubrick to be one of the greatest film-makers who has ever lived - we're talking about the man that gave us what I consider to be the finest film ever made (2001 : A Space Odyssey). I've seen it a zillion times (I'm saw it in the cinema the week it was released), and there are moments where it still takes my breath away. Not to mention Dr Strangelove, Full Metal Jacket, Clockwork Orange, The Shining, etc. etc.
No, the last thing I want is for him to be judged on EWS - I'd much rather it was forgotten completely and we remember his many triumphs.
-- Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
What an asinine question.
by
jotaeleemeese
·
· Score: 1
You do what you can in your context and circumstances.
There are people for which waking up every morning and managing to lead an almost normal life is an achievment that easily overshadows anything Lucas has ever done, but that naturally is not highligted since achieving this does not touch as many people as a film maker.
So stop the patronizing, we may be doing more things that you are obviously denying people credit for.
-- IANAL but write like a drunk one.
Re:What an asinine question.
by
Perdition
·
· Score: 1
So, let me get this straight... We should ALL get AFI lifetime achievement awards for leading almost normal lives? It sort of takes the shine off the apple, so you can have mine. George Lucas gets awarded for his film work, and everyone crawls out to say what a hack he is. I ask what films they have made to displace his achievement, and you say I have devalued humanity in general. One word: decaf.
-- Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
To receive the Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition in 2005, and the Super Extended Lifetime Achievement Award Special Edition Platinum in 2014.
I didn't know trashing the trilogy was an achievement... go figure... fp?
There exists some positive integer N that you are the Nth person to read this signature.
Award win you shall!
Yawn. Who cares? A lifetime achievement award for making a bunch of low-quality plot-recipe movies and becoming stinking rich as a result; and we have to give him an award?
I was unaware that giving birth to Jar-Jar Binks was considered as a "life achievement"...
Then again, everything depends on what you mean by "achievement".
Karma cannot be described by words alone.
Where is Jar Jar's award!?!?!?!
All we need, now he'll think he's good and remaster Indian jones... and Indie wont shoot first.
I like muppets.
I can't wait until 20 years down the road, when he releases the DVD of the AFI program, replacing a 60 year old Lucas with a virile 20 year old version of himself. There will be space battles, too.
400 Person LAN for Charity: Zion LAN 2005
that that award was for someone who continues to innovate and pursue new things, not someone who does something great and spends the next 20 years tinkering with minute details of said work.
For remastering dvd to show a puppet, now with more wrinkles!?
[ I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance ] -- Isaac Asimov
<Wilhelm-Scream>AHHHHHHHHH! AHHHHHHHH!</Wilhelm-Scream>
... he didn't really get this award for creating the character known as Jar Jar Binks.
Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || http://AdTerrasPerAspera.com
Although I will say they have finally found a good character for his over-acting on Boston Legal.
This way to the egress...
The criteria stated that "the recipient should be one whose talent has in a fundamental way advanced the film art; whose accomplishment has been acknowledged by scholars, critics, professional peers and the general public; and whose work has stood the test of time." In 1993, AFI trustees extended the criteria to encompass individuals with active careers and work of significance yet to be accomplished. "
(From http://www.afi.com/tvevents/laa/laasite/)
Despite the debacles that are the 'new' trilogy, no fan could watch the extras DVD that came with Star Wars and deny that it brought a lump to the throat to see how the film that defined space adventure for a generation was literally dragged kicking and screaming to the screen, all despite incredible odds, horrendous bad luck and dumbass studio execs through the sheer force of will and unshakable self belief that the story he was telling had to be told. Much as I really dont like how he conducts himself these days, no-one could say the man hasn't earned his place in history and in the hearts and minds of thirtysomethings globally. I can't hear the opening bars of the John Williams theme without getting chills down my spine and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
I've got some photographs, I'd like to show them to you. Though you don't know the girls You'll recognise the view..
Having the dumb luck to stumble into the greatest movie franchise in history, Lucas has taken that little bit of luck and transformed it into his vision of a complete alternate universe. Had he been any other short-sighted director (Spielberg, I'm looking right at you and your last half of A.I.) the Star Wars trilogy would have simply ended with the dance of the Ewoks. However, Lucas was able to transform that complete story into a more complete story by going back and fixing and editing and putting in scenes that were originally not his vision in the first place. I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.
The problem is that most people cannot understand the mind of a visionary and it isn't until long after they fade into irrelevance that they truly become appreciated. So too it is with Lucas, I believe. Many people are so worried about their childhood memories that they cry wolf every time Lucas decides to change a scene. Nevermind the fact that the whole Star Wars universe makes more sense when the updated (Director's Cut, if you will) scenes are added to the films.
Lucas truly does deserve this award not only for what rich memories he brought to us when we were still kids, but also for the memories he gives kids of the future. When we look back in 20 years and reminisce about the Star Wars Nonology we will finally see why Greedo had to shoot first and why Jar Jar was crucial to the story of Anakin Skywalker.
to not only give birth to Jar-Jar Binks (ok folks, I don't really want to imagine it either), but to also make a shitload of money with it.
Kudos to Lucas for that achievement.
If he won't make a comment, I will.
WHY!?!
By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
I will make no other comment
No comment is also a comment...
According to MSN Encarta (hey, it was the first one I found on a google search) these are the past winners of the AFI Lifetime achievement award.
1973 John Ford
1974 James Cagney
1975 Orson Welles
1976 William Wyler
1977 Bette Davis
1978 Henry Fonda
1979 Alfred Hitchcock
1980 James Stewart
1981 Fred Astaire
1982 Frank Capra
1983 John Huston
1984 Lillian Gish
1985 Gene Kelly
1986 Billy Wilder
1987 Barbara Stanwyck
1988 Jack Lemmon
1989 Gregory Peck
1990 Sir David Lean
1991 Kirk Douglas
1992 Sidney Poitier
1993 Elizabeth Taylor
1994 Jack Nicholson
1995 Steven Spielberg
1996 Clint Eastwood
1997 Martin Scorsese
1998 Robert Wise
1999 Dustin Hoffman
2000 Harrison Ford
2001 Barbra Streisand
2002 Tom Hanks
2003 Robert De Niro
2004 Meryl Streep
There are some pretty serious names on that list. My point is, why now? The nostalgia for the first trilogy of films is good and all, but really, they were only 3 movies.
----
Squirrel
Much as we all enjoy reading about how Lucus raped your childhood, his movies are probably only a small part of why he is getting this award. The man is directly responsible for much of the technology behind modern film making - nonlinear editing, sound post-production and reproduction, digital effects, virtual sets, virtual extras, and now he is a leading force in digital film. Not to mention the great strides he made in marketing and licensing :)
All these techniques were developed for his projects, and there is not a film made today that does not use them in some way.
He is certainly more deserving than 2001's winner - Barbra Streisand!
sheep.horse - does not contain information on sheep or horses.
Now he can quit.
I will make no other comment.
Now, isn't that a pretty clear comment?
...for besting luke skywalker in the whiny punk category
Beware the fury of a patient man
- John Dryden
but what have YOU done?
Windows XP SP2 told me to install third-party software that prevents viruses and protects stability... I chose Ubuntu
Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
I sense a disturbance in the force... as if millions of voices cried out in terror, and then were suddenly silenced.
Love the Third Amendment?
i am longing for even more star wars movies?
when will the sequels (read: episode 7,8,9) finally apprear. he once even thought about a quadruple trilogy, so there is even room for episodes 10,11 and 12....
damn, the star wars universe is so great, only there are all these books and novels for the post-episode-6 era now, and i doubt it, that lucas gonna make movies out of the books of his "competitors" or fellow authors who got accepted into the vast star wars universe and expanded it even further...
although the timothy zahn books (also a trilogy) which take place after episode-6 in the star wars universe timeline and many other authors have added valuable material, stories and character so the star wars universe.
i could really make up my mind, if i would be in favor of lucas making completely new films (his ideas from the past, as he has originally planned 3time 3episodes) or if lucas (or somebody else) should take all these fine books and make some more and never-ending films and adaptations....
star wars would be the place/universe to live in.
afterall there is a famous saying:
--
"Reality is truly stranger than fiction; Probably why fiction is so popular"
for Trey Parker and Matt Stone! They've managed to save at least one part of my childhood from senseless defilement. Where the fuck is their award?
I'm constantly surprised that George Lucas was lucid and creative enough to create American Graffiti... it's a film that has not only withstood the test of time, quite an achievement for what could have easily been just a nostalgia piece, but has the perfect balance of comedy and drama, and manages to develop many different storylines (most multi-threaded films tend to skimp on any sort of real character and story development and the crossover between storylines is often very poor).
sig.
That's quite a successful run. Maybe not a "lifetime" of achievement, but a bunch of great and/or insanely popular movies in a short period of time.
It's unfortunate that the recent stuff sucks, but he's still got a pretty amazing record.
Disclaimer: I work for a company, but I don't speak for them.
"George Lucas is receiving the AFI Lifetime Achievement award. I will make no other comment."
Oh, c'mon, don't like that. You'll get yours too, eventually!
1)He created original trilogy. Those movies are one of the best movies ever.
;)
2)He destroyed it with Special Edition.
3)Then he created three crappy prequels*. (worst movies ever).
And now the conclusion:
Thats helluva lot of determinination and hard work. He deserves it.
* I never saw episode iii, but judging from i and ii, I'm almost certanly right
Trolls are like broken clocks. They show the truth two times a day. The rest of the day they talk nonsense.
Getting millions of people to pay bucks to watch Jar-Jar _IS_ an achievement.
It's LotR in space. His luck is that he got there first, and managed to work out some of the important parts, lightsabers for instance. It was something from his youth or college (LotR), combined with something topical (our future in space), and told in a storytelling style familiar too him (serials).
I'm not dismissing his contribution, or insight, but Star Wars was as much a product of it's time as it was of Lucas's vision.
It really was his one great idea, and he managed to, with the help of Speilberg, recreate some of it in Indiana Jones, but Lucas has always been chasing another Star Wars, and it's pretty clear there is nothing genuine left in him.
... thats why you havent seen it yet.
it will be really sad to see the star wars universe grind to a halt when ep3 will be finally screening, cos unless lucas decides to change his mind, it seems that there wont be any more episodes (in contrast to his promis in the past decades, that his idea of starwars was a three or even four time trilogy).
but i want to have episodes 7-9 at least, best would be episodes 7-12 and even more....
please georgie-boy, will ya? thanks.
As always a story brings out the most short sighted posters, upset over the treatment of Star Wars.
Lets not forget that the award is not for Star Wars but for his achievements to the industry.
Lucas helped found ILM which helped get special effects to the what they are today. Skywalker Sound has contributed to hundreds of films. THX certification got cinemas, film and DVD production quality up.
And personally, I loved Howard the Duck...
[)amien
Yet perhaps not so much for the art of movies. Alas, because I enjoyed the original trilogy so much in my childhood.
He created one of the greatest (and first, I believe) movie merchandizing businesses in history. I would question whether there would be so many "Power Ranger Toys" or "Barney" tie-ins if the Star Wars franchise hadn't done been so successful.
He has continually expanded the frontier of digital effects in film-making, and although in recent years his studio's work has been eclipsed by other films (e.g., The Matrix, Shrek, Toy Story, Finding Nemo, Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow, etc.), I do believe that nevertheless he deserves credit for the push towards effective uses of digital imagery in cinema.
He has enhanced the audio experience in most large cinemas in operation today (at least in the US). I can't say how many times I've seen "THX-1138" digital surround sound by Dolby--that sound system was developed in conjunction with Lucas' team.
He was first to expand the idea of film sequels (and series) in modern cinema. Would we have had Die Hard, Die Harder were it not for Lucas? Would we have The Matrix, The Matrix Reloaded, The Matrix Revolutions were it not for Lucas? What about Star Trek the Movie I-IV? Back to the Future I-II? If the original trilogy had not been so popular with audiences, would subsequent sequels & series concepts have been developed other major film studios?
There may be other such achievements as well, but with the above I think there is a strong case that Lucas reshaped how the business of movies does it's business.
...the parts where he revolutionised film making (THX, Skywalker Sound, ILM, non-linear editing) and where he became the most successful independent film-maker of all time.
Important Stuff # Please try to keep posts on topic. # Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads. # Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said. # Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about. # Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
I mean think about it:
1. Industrial Light and Magic essentially pioneered the modern age of cinematic special effects. They took "traditional" special effects to new levels of excellence and helped pioneer CGI effects for movies.
2. Pixar pioneered much of what computer animation can do, and under subsequent leadership of Steve Jobs the company has produced several blockbuster hit movies.
3. Lucas Sound helped develop the THX certification for high quality movie presentation in the theaters, and it has extended that certification to DVD mastering, too. A THX-certified DVD tends to have high-quality picture and sound on average.
Lifetime achievement for most money made while ignoring the fans who keep forking over more money no matter how much he insults them.
Sounds like an achievement to me.
"George Lucas To Receive Liftime In Prison"
:P
I own a pump action golf ball cannon. I made it myself.
Any comments?
I wonder how much he dislikes American Graffity. I bet he totally hates it.
But I think he should win for giving us the beloved Lucasarts company... :)
Well, up until the screwed up, and then canceled Sam and Max 2 and Full Throttle.
was a good movie.
And enough about the special edition whining. Yes, he altered your ppreeeeciousssssss, and this somehow ruined your childhood. If your childhood memories were that fragile and inordinately foccused on a fluffy sci-fi flick, well, maybe they deserved a solid kick in the balls.
--- Ban humanity.
Populair movies. POPULAIR.
he didnt make no freakkin schindlers list.
THX1138 was an excellent movie.
The distributors spat on it at the time.
Considering his subsequent work, I've always figured you want the definition of "embittered cynic" you look up George Lucas.
That's what the State Farm advertisement said when I checked the article. Christ, I couldn't have said it better, myself. it's time for Georgiepoo to retire. Sooner is better than later.
Halt the pathogen at it's source; don't just treat the symptoms.
That kind of monumental and over-composed style of music also gives me shakes. I guess that the music is OK, but I am very sick of it.
Boooooooooooo!
If you've not seen "PI", get it. B&W, deals with mathematics (naturally, but not on a level that will leave you scratchin' your head...well, you are reading /., so it shouldn't), and a great flick. The soundtrack, while not necessary is quite nice.
... as if millions of _real_, skilled directors cried out in terror, and were suddenly silenced...
It's like telling him, until now, you've done everything worthy in your life, please, leave StarWars alone. Don't touch it anymore!
DON'T PANIC
.. he invented the Internet!
What lifetime achievement? Achievement of brainwashing the masses with his despotic agenda? Sorry for a rant... I have already written about it. It will probably be modded down in no time, just because it is not a trendy thing to say here, but what the hell...
Isn't "Star Wars" good old fashioned sci-fi? Harmless fun? Some people call it "eye candy" -- a chance to drop back into childhood and punt your adult cares away for two hours, dwelling in a lavish universe where good and evil are vividly drawn, without all the inconvenient counterpoint distinctions that clutter daily life.
Got a problem? Cleave it with a light saber! Wouldn't you love -- just once in your life -- to dive a fast little ship into your worst enemy's stronghold and set off a chain reaction, blowing up the whole megillah from within its rotten core while you streak away to safety at the speed of light? (It's such a nifty notion that it happens in three out of four "Star Wars" flicks.)
One of the problems with so-called light entertainment today is that somehow, amid all the gaudy special effects, people tend to lose track of simple things, like story and meaning. They stop noticing the moral lessons the director is trying to push. Yet these things matter.
By now it's grown clear that George Lucas has an agenda, one that he takes very seriously. After four "Star Wars" films, alarm bells should have gone off, even among those who don't look for morals in movies. When the chief feature distinguishing "good" from "evil" is how pretty the characters are, it's a clue that maybe the whole saga deserves a second look.
Just what bill of goods are we being sold, between the frames?
- Elites have an inherent right to arbitrary rule; common citizens needn't be consulted. They may only choose which elite to follow.
- "Good" elites should act on their subjective whims, without evidence, argument or accountability.
- Any amount of sin can be forgiven if you are important enough.
- True leaders are born. It's genetic. The right to rule is inherited.
- Justified human emotions can turn a good person evil.
That is just the beginning of a long list of "moral" lessons relentlessly pushed by "Star Wars." Lessons that starkly differentiate this saga from others that seem superficially similar, like "Star Trek." (We'll take a much closer look at some stark divergences between these two sci-fi universes below.)
Above all, I never cared for the whole Nietzschian Übermensch thing: the notion -- pervading a great many myths and legends -- that a good yarn has to be about demigods who are bigger, badder and better than normal folk by several orders of magnitude. It's an ancient storytelling tradition based on abiding contempt for the masses -- one that I find odious in the works of A.E. Van Vogt, E.E. Smith, L. Ron Hubbard and wherever you witness slanlike super-beings deciding the fate of billions without ever pausing to consider their wishes.
Wow, you say. If I feel that strongly about this, why just a week-long boycott? Why see the latest "Star Wars" film at all?
Because I am forced to admit that demigod tales resonate deeply in the human heart.
In "The Hero With a Thousand Faces," Joseph Campbell showed how a particular, rhythmic storytelling technique was used in almost every ancient and pre-modern culture, depicting protagonists and antagonists with certain consistent motives and character traits, a pattern that transcended boundaries of language and culture. In these classic tales, the hero begins reluctant, yet signs and portents foretell his pre-ordained greatness. He receives dire warnings and sage wisdom from a mentor, acquires quirky-but-faithful companions, faces a series of steepening crises, explores the pit of his own fears and emerges triumphant to bring some boon/talisman/victory home to his admiring tribe/people/nation.
By offering valuable insights into this revered storytelling tradition, Joseph Campbell did indeed shed light on common spiritua
Association of Fucking Idiots?
First a clarification. While I do think that plenty of evidence shows that George Lucas hates a civilization that's been very good to him... and that his storytelling faults are innumerable... this does not mean that I'm saying everything in the Star Wars universe is evil and perverse! (See below where I praise Luke Skywalker and especially Han Solo.) So many people would not flock to the films if there weren't many positive traits. The Campbellian and Enlightenment traditions can have considerable overlap -- despite their struggle at deeper levels. Among the better (though simpleminded) lessons that you do see in even the worst Star Wars films are -- "Mean people suck," "Be brave," "Be steadfast to your friends," "Try to stay calm," and "Keep on trying."
Indeed, I have never said we should eliminate Joseph Campbell-type myths from our storytelling heritage! When they are good, they rock. Anyway, they are deeply rooted inside us, for well or ill. I just think we ought to TRY to grow up a bit and appreciate other modes of fiction that are less cliched, formulaic, predictable, and obeissant to elites.
For the Campbellian myth can VERY easily go wrong, and turn into a nightmare. That's what has happened to George Lucas's particular vision, in which a "rebellion" is used to symbolize the legitimization of divine rule by demigods. And it's gotten worse the more seriously Lucas takes himself, from the idealism and simple hopefulness of Movie #1 (A New Hope) to the dismal futility of the recent Phantom Menace. (See point #1 below.) Over the long run, we're going to have to face these matters, so why not get down to it now?
For those of you just starting out, I do seriously recommend you go first to the two web sites posted at the top of this page. You'll be much better equipped to see why the points that follow (below) are relevant.
The most common email I received from Lucas defenders was to attack a single perceived flaw in the part of my article dealing with The Phantom Menace itself -- zeroing in on my complaint regarding the nature of the master scheme by Senator Palpatine... to use the crisis on his homeworld to manipulate his own rise to power. The people who raised this point avoided commenting on any of the major issues I raised -- e.g., Lucas's elitism, the "demigod mythos," or GL's openly expressed antipathy toward democratic western civilization. Instead, they cried "gotcha!" -- as if my failure to grasp Palpatine's scheme invalidates every other point I tried to raise.
My answer is simple. Of COURSE I saw that Palpatine was using the invasion of Naboo to engineer his accession as Chancellor, by getting his cousin, the Queen, to denouce the old (good) Chancellor. I just couldn't credit that the whole thing could be so stupid.
Consider these questions:
* If the queen's so influential, able to topple the head of a galaxy, why was she earlier unable to get any help from all these political allies she's calling upon?
* Um, so what's to keep the shamed-defeated Trade Federation guys from later on screaming "It was Palpatine! He MADE us doo eet!" The fact that the Sith Lord's eyes were in shadow? They really know nothing about a guy they've sworn fealty to and staked everything on? Some savvy traders!
* Palpatine is clearly concerned about being hunted down by the Jedi, right? Yet he draws their newly-roused attention right to his own home planet? He couldn't have used another?
* Oh, and why does he send Maul to kill Amidala and her escorts on Tatooine, when they are bringing her to the Senate to do exactly what he wants her to do? Does that make even marginal sense? (In fact, he'd send a space yacht to pick her up and escort her to the Senate in style, while keeping Darth Maul secret a while longer.) Now that we get right down to it, Palpatine WANTS Amidala to escape from Naboo. Or he should. If Lucas bothered to plot at all.
* Oh, the scheme is dumb about forty other ways. But above all, the "success" of Palpatine's plan makes t
AFI is just about the shittiest band out there.
And what is lucas getting a "lifetime achievement award" for? All he's really done is 50 versions of the same Star Wars movie (original, digitally enhanced, audio enhanced, remade, etc etc) plus ET. He really hasn't done much and what he has done has been half-assed crap like Star Wars (which I still feel is boring and ridiculous - it's not THAT great, guys - grow up).
... to get a lifetime achievement award if your constantly allowed to go back, digitially edit, and resubmit your life's work for approval until you get it write (or wrong i guess).
Do, or do not!
I delivered a much justified smackdown. Blow my thick, hard chubby before going back to masturbating over your fanboy altars.
--- Ban humanity.
The award presenter shoots first.
In Star Wars, Luke comes off as some petualant child who went to the sooky child school of acting. If was hard to get involved with his badly written character, and Han Solo come off as some sort of space hick. The only redeeming feature was a bra-less princess Laia.
Whilst watching the truly awful Return of the Jedi, I noticed that the characters seem to say all their actions and speak in pure exposition e.g. I'm going to go *there* and do *that*. This film is worse than pantomime.
Give George credit where credit is due, THX is great, the special effects are fab, but the acting, plot, and characters all stink.
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
Night of the Living Dead?
The rest are rehashing the same idiotic themes repeatedly.
---
Book(n): Utensil used to pass time while waiting for the TV repairman
For f*cks sake grow up and stop moaning about the 'raping of your childhood'.
Beyond Star Wars, Lucas and his team have pioneered the fields of non-linear editing, optical and digital visual effects, computer generated imagery, sound editing/mixing/recording and many other fields that have contributed *directly* to the cinema.
THX sound systems for cinema and home. Skywalker Sound. Industrial Light + Magic. The Pixar computer.
Heck even Photoshop started there as 'Display', before becoming 'ImagePro' and then 'Photoshop' c/o Thomas Knoll.
I could go on, but I know I'll be buried under people doing their so called 'funny' and 'insightful' comments about Jar Jar and childhood-raping...
Sure, making three separate releases of the same movie, in three different ways, is an achievement. Sort of like the 'great victory' King Pyrrhus achieved.
Look, I hated Jar Jar's pratfals in the first movie as much as the next guy.
But in the second movie the stupidity had a point - he was an easy to use pawn, one of the weak minded people that is so easily manipulted by force powers. I was actually quite happy with how Jar Jar was used in teh second, even though I thought they went way overboard with the physical comedy in the first.
The whole *point* is that he's stupid, not that he's hated. He'll end up being hated (or pitied) because he's so stupid.
"There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
Many of the editing techniques, and special effects done today are possible because of his drive and commentment.
you can say what you want about ther Star Wars series, but they did influence the industry. The way movie companies viewed sci-fi films after Star-Wars was a lot more seriously then before Star-Wars.
WOuld Alien as been as good if George hadn't proved there is a market for 'grity' sci-fi?
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
THX1138
American Graffiti
Star Wars Trilogy
Indiana Jones Trilogy
Not bad.
American Graffiti in particular seems to be overlooked. It really captured a certain feeling of a time and place; was funny and engaging.
After Star Wars, he moved from directing to producing. That was the change. But everyone gets older. He deserves the achievement award.
I hate to use the word visionary, but Lucas truly has a vision.
So do people with malaria.
I think this achievement is more about its wallet than about its talent. The juges are Unitedstaters.
He'd stop making movies on par with the Cabage Patch Kids. I'm not worried about my childhood memories, I'd really like to see him make a movie with the imagination of an adult. These dumbed down Star Wars movies have been thinner then a childrens cartoon and all the while the real world has continued grow more complex. Give me a Star Wars with characters with flaws. Something to sink my teeth into.
Quack, quack.
that a place that alledgedly devoted to 'News for Nerds' would appriacte this a lot more.
1) Made Sci-fi movies Mainstream
2) Set ground work for technology to make better sci-fi movies
3) Created the most Kick ass Sci-fi movie of it's time.
4) Independant film maker
What's with the haters?
Quite frankly this 'it's big and worth a lot of money so lets hate it attitude has gotten old.' Except for Google. Speak bad about Google and you'll be moderated down to hell.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
I can't believe how two or three little changes can "destroy" a movie. I enjoyed the original saga, and even if Greedo shoots a split-second earlier, I think the restoration and improvements that have been made to image quality (e.g. lightsabres) are worth it.
I think George Lucas deserves an award!
Some kind of one way ticket to hell seems like a most deserving reward for his... efforts.
Does this mean that he can go fucking die already?
Lifetime Achievement Award for Sodomizing Our Memories? Star Wars *used* to be good.
this award is going to a person who made some
cheesy movies that made some serious money.
We judge him by how much money he made.
slashdot geeks, is star wars really worth
talking about anymore? Obviously todays news is
pretty sad, otherwsie i would skip this post.
I would rather watch a black and white charlie
chaplin film and see revolutinary special effects.
Not this guy 80 years later.
I feel so sorry for fanboys that grew up watching Episodes 4, 5, and 6 and thinking how "kewl" it was "A long, long time ago in a galaxy far, far away", but then grew up and think Episodes 1, 2, and 3 suck. I'm a fan of the 4, 5, and 6 (especially "Empire"), but you know, 1, 2, and 3 really are the same quality as 4 and 6... all 6 movies were made for 12 year old males, not the 30-year old geeks we are now.
What can I say... That's just your opinion, and if you have a hard time accepting others, feeling the need to look down on others, you're just narrow-minded.
That is by far the coolest quote I've found on slashdot. I think it really speaks for itself. Someday, I dream of cobbling together such an utterance into such a form.
Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
It's getting old... just like Lucas' beard... I wonder if he was born with it...
But seriously, he did a couple of good things.
- Gave us Indy and Young Indy and palmed it off to Spielberg to do something good with.
- Gave us Pixar and sold that off, which eventually ended up with Mr Jobs and a fantastic little animation movie studio.
Notice how everything he gets rid of turns to Gold
Join the Digital TV discussion @ http://forums.dvbowners.com
If you take a moment to remove the tinfoil hat and take a look at what Lucas has done... I'd say he deserves it. His methods as far as hollywood politics alone revolutionized the industry of movie-making.
Beside that, he's led development of some of the best industry departments and standards out there. He was largely responsible for Pixar!
So before you're too quick to bash him for the obvious blunders he's had, at least have the fairness to recognize what he has really done well.
It's really quite an honour.
I've been deficating in books, on works of art,sculptures, scores of music, etc... for years! I didn't think anyone would actually appreciate my efforts.
Thank goodness there are awards for everything now'a'days... although, all of my mischief pales in comparison to Lucas (that f*#ker s*!ts on everything he can); he'll probably win it in a walk.
Oh well, there's always next year. I hear Bush will be nominated.
"No! No, freakin' kids. I do not need this, I've got a masters degree in folklore mythology."
There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
...some of the events in his life will be altered so they more closely match the life George originally intended.
"We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
Years and years of producing films, not movies, and you want him judged for the last one that by all accounts was an honourable failure?
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
You do what you can in your context and circumstances.
There are people for which waking up every morning and managing to lead an almost normal life is an achievment that easily overshadows anything Lucas has ever done, but that naturally is not highligted since achieving this does not touch as many people as a film maker.
So stop the patronizing, we may be doing more things that you are obviously denying people credit for.
IANAL but write like a drunk one.
I pity the moderator who worships George Lucas. Geez, you act like I killed your father or something.