Slashdot Mirror


Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas Launch

The first of this year's AAA titles has launched, and the first reviews are in. Gamespot, IGN, and OPM all have looks at the game, and it sounds great. If you want to keep track of the pool-shooting race track driving everything-under-one-roof extravaganza, the GameRankings page is available as well. When you play the game this week make sure and tune in to WCTR News to catch Anchorman Richard Burns, TV's Wil Wheaton. More seriously, reviews aren't the only thing the developers are looking for. Commentary regarding Take Two Interactive's slipping stock is available on CNN Money's Game Over.

419 comments

  1. Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm planning to run out to the store and steal it as soon as soon as I can, even if I don't own a Playstation 2.

    And TV's Wil Wheaton? Excuse me! I think you mean Slashdot's Wil Wheaton! Is he the first Slashdotter to do voicework for GTA?

    1. Re:Awesome! by Orgazmus · · Score: 0, Troll

      Why dont you just download it?
      It has been online for a while :)

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    2. Re:Awesome! by jr87 · · Score: 2, Funny

      no he meant fark's Wil Wheaton :-P

    3. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > > No! Piracy is bad and wrong and sends you to hell. Stealing, however, is just fine.

      > But, but... Piracy IS stealing!!

      Technically yes, but only at sea, and even then only without a commission from a recognized sovereign nation.

    4. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, but... Piracy IS stealing!!

      Yes. But do it like Robin Hood. Steal and give it to the poor (i.e. me) :)

    5. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where is the ASCII Goatse? I was told I would see an ASCII Goatse if I came to this Internet Page.

    6. Re:Awesome! by Krypto420 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'm planning to run out to the store and steal it as soon as soon as I can, even if I don't own a Playstation 2.

      Why don't you just steal one of those while your at it? Sheesh!

    7. Re:Awesome! by B1-66ER · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Heheh

    8. Re:Awesome! by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      When you play the game this week make sure and tune in to WCTR News to catch Anchorman Richard Burns, TV's Wil Wheaton.

      Dick Burns? Maybe Wil's spent too much time, uh, recovering health.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dick Burns? Maybe Wil's spent too much time, uh, recovering health.

      You mean recovering from his penile burns?

    10. Re:Awesome! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1
      And TV's Wil Wheaton? Excuse me! I think you mean Slashdot's Wil Wheaton!

      Oh noes! He escaped!

      Quickly, someone tazer him and bring him back in here!

    11. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, it's Nick Burns, your company computer guy!

      Moooove!

    12. Re:Awesome! by okayplayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or how about the other nerd related voice actors, such as Kevin Mitnick or Emmanual Goldstein? Good looks to Lazlo (who is actually still running around the office) for getting them in. The first time I heard those voice, I almost doubted they were real.

      --
      What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
    13. Re:Awesome! by 3terrabyte · · Score: 1

      And you could steal a copy, and give it to me. P2P stealing! I like it.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    14. Re:Awesome! by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Informative

      For those of you not planning on stealing a copy, head over to your local ToysRUs. They're having a buy 2 get 1 free sale on console games right now.

      This has been a public service announcement.

    15. Re:Awesome! by phiz187 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bernie S. and Emmanuel Goldstein

      Were both voice actors in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City.
      -PHiZ

      --
      Pretend I said something meaningful or insightful here.
    16. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The link you are looking for is included in this comment.

    17. Re:Awesome! by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how stating a fact and suggesting that downloading is a less brutal way of stealing a copy is trolling?

      --
      The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
    18. Re:Awesome! by Bz3rk · · Score: 0, Troll

      Eh, I liked the GTA series back when it was called "Driver"

    19. Re:Awesome! by chrismcdirty · · Score: 1

      You actually liked Driver? Ewww.. I liked Driver better when it was called GTA. Perspective makes no a difference in the gameplay department. Driver was basically Pacman in cars, since it told you specific streets you needed to use to get to the destination.

      GTA (02/28/98)
      Driver (06/30/99)

      --
      It's like sex, except I'm having it!
    20. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful
      It was a joke, you moron.

      But I wouldn't expect someone like you to know that. Afterall, you're pimping one of those fucking ipod pyramid schemes in your sig. Fuck off and die.

    21. Re:Awesome! by black+mariah · · Score: 0

      The first couple of Driver games were nothing but Destruction Derby set in a city. In case you haven't noticed, it's Driver that is playing catchup (and failing, I might add).

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    22. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New rule! Anyone who uses the wrong 'your' loses their insightful mod.

      Also, this guy was not presenting any insight. If you don't know what 'insightful' means, kindly refrain from using it when you have mod points. Thanks.

    23. Re:Awesome! by acz · · Score: 1

      The last Iraq war was pure piracy. United Pirates of America.

    24. Re:Awesome! by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I went to school with a guy named "Rich Burns", I never even thought about calling him Dick. Well not until now.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    25. Re:Awesome! by rubberbando · · Score: 1

      Dick Burns? Maybe Wil's spent too much time, uh, recovering health.

      Yeah, he never did recover from leech he got on his peepee during the filming of Stand By Me.

      --
      DEAD DEAD DEAD DELETE ME
    26. Re:Awesome! by djtrialprice · · Score: 1

      Dick Burns? Maybe Wil's spent too much time, uh, recovering health.

      Remember GTA III? Those of you that get my Fernando Martinez sig will. And the name of Head Radio's DJ? Ah yes, Mike "Wheels of Steel" Hunt.

      Mike Hunt. I'll give you minute.

    27. Re:Awesome! by cluke · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, GTA3 was definitely influenced by Driver, but it was what Driver *could* have been, had the dev team had some balls.
      I could just see their focus group "you can't have a game where you commit crimes and run over civilians! Let's have the paper thin excuse of him being an undercover cop, and commit the crimes anyway! And oh yeah, make the civvies leap dramatically out of the way unharmed no matter how fast you come at them!" That cop thing was ludicrous. Like when you're 'protecting' the president in the final mission but all the FBI guys are trying to kill you 'cos no-one has clued them in to the fact you're really a cop. Er, guys? That car you just kamikazied into a wall? You do know the president was in there? (If it had've been Bush I suppose...)

      And then GTA3 comes along, and says "Fuck it" and it's a million times the game Driver was, and is so damn successful it destroys the Driver series forever and makes them look like the fence-sitting milque-toasts they are.
      I think GTA3 itself best summed it up, in the mission where you had to kill the rat in your organisation, an undercover cop who was a good 'driver' but 'hopeless out of the car'.

      Driver, you were utterly, utterly owned by GTA3. Time to give up and think of what could have been.

  2. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  3. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  4. Which month is it? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's the end of October, and you think that 'GTA 3.2' is the first of the year's AAA titles?

    Meh.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:Which month is it? by SetupWeasel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank god someone else feels this way. If I had mod points, I'd help out your karma. Your post is a valid criticism, and the only troll around is the PS2 Fanboy that modded you down.

      I'm almost as excited about GTA 3.2 as I was about another of those supposed AAA games this year, Wolfenstein 3D 8.

    2. Re:Which month is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thank god someone else feels this way. If I had mod points, I'd help out your karma. Your post is a valid criticism, and the only troll around is the PS2 Fanboy that modded you down.

      Agreed! I hope the metamodders will make some sweet justice here.

    3. Re:Which month is it? by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I don't understand this at all.

      Doom3?
      The Sims2?

      These weren't AAA titles???...please...

    4. Re:Which month is it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, they were actually AA9 titles. Also, those are computer games, not console games. They don't mean a damn thing to me until the Mac version comes out, and even then they're not games I would buy. Perhaps Tales of Symphonia or Phantom Brave would be a better choice... Star Ocean: Til the End of Time also.

    5. Re:Which month is it? by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      I accept that this is little more than gta3 expansion pack 2, and i still think i'll have more fun with this than any other game this year, except maybe ut2004. It's a solid engine with a hell of a lot of new content... What's to whine about?

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    6. Re:Which month is it? by 13Echo · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know. The first things that caught my mind... What about Doom 3? What about Tales of Symphonia? What about Paper Mario? What about Pikmin 2? What about MGS: Twin Snakes? Maybe someone should notice that there are some kickass games beyond those on the PS2.

    7. Re:Which month is it? by silentbobdp · · Score: 1

      Both Half-Life 2 and Halo 2 are slated to come out in the next month, and will be the next step in FPS narrative - something the genre is sorely missing. You probably didn't even notice that there is no HL2 multiplayer - that all falls on Counterstrike: Source.

      That stated, while VC was definitely GTA 3.1, San Andreas is far far more than GTA 3.2. There are so many new factors, so many new vehicles and abilities that it's definitely a viable sequel to GTA 3.

      "OMG IT'S POPULAR IT CAN'T BE GOOD." This is not a valid argument.

      --
      --Moo.
    8. Re:Which month is it? by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      I listen to "OMG ITS RATED "E" SO IT CAN'T BE GOOD." all the freaking time. "I CAN'T KILL PROSTITUTES SO IT CAN'T BE GOOD"

      "There are so many new factors, so many new vehicles and abilities that it's definitely a viable sequel to GTA 3."

      Wow, new CARS! You can fly a helicopter too! Wait! You can ENTER HOUSES?!?! ORIGINALITY!

      " Both Half-Life 2 and Halo 2 are slated to come out in the next month, and will be the next step in FPS narrative"

      Narrative in video games? There are no Tolstoys or Douglas Adamses in the video game industry (since Adams died), so the best narratives keep it simple and focus on GAMEPLAY which is sorely lacking these days.

      Want narrative? Read Anna Karenina. Want a video game? I hear this Galaga game has quite a following with the kids these days.

    9. Re:Which month is it? by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone should notice that there are some kickass games beyond those on the PS2.
      Likewise, there are some kickass games beyond those on the GC (and the obligatory PC game DOOM3). :D

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    10. Re:Which month is it? by Zeromous · · Score: 1

      How did such a troll get modded as interesting? You obviously do not understand the industry product cycle. Let me guess you only play PeeCee.

      Pre-christmas Q3/Q4 for the console industry is the focus of the majority of a publishers marketing efforts and product releases. And yes this is one of the first AAA releases of the season unless of course you count Doom3, also released in Q3

      --
      ---Up Up Down Down Left Right Left Right B A START
  5. Re:Good indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah and Amazon reviews are always a great measure of how good something is. Nobody has ever abused that rating system.

  6. Re:New Features by eln · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eating food to survive? Did they get a bunch of ex-DIKU mud coders for this one or something?

    At any rate, I've never played a GTA game. Is this one different enough to pay full price for, or would I get substantially the same gaming experience buying GTA3 or Vice City for less money?

  7. Rally Driving? by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    catch Anchorman Richard Burns

    So we can finally drive world rally championship cars in GTA?

    1. Re:Rally Driving? by SavoWood · · Score: 1

      And I just spent my last mod points yesterday on a "Funny" posting when I could have created a whole new "Clever" moderation for this post. ;-)

      Chances are I won't see mod points again for a few days, and by then, someone will realize who Richard Burns is and mod this "Insightful".

      Damnitman...cursing the day...

      --
      Plant a tree in a developing country.
    2. Re:Rally Driving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      done. the joys of having one machine to mod from and another to post from ;-)

    3. Re:Rally Driving? by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Methinks the reference is not to a rally driver, but to the short form of the name Richard. Dick Burns, get it? Haha. Ha.

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
  8. Anchorman Dick Burns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm... that's a urinary tract infection or worse, Wil. As a smart banker once said: do you trust your wife?

  9. Study? by Grayden · · Score: 5, Funny

    GTA: San Andreas, Halo 2, and Half-Life 2 all coming out within a short span?

    Man my GPA is screwed.

    1. Re:Study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Halo 2"

      Huh? Why is that in your list?

    2. Re:Study? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Forget your GPA. Most people's job are going to be screwed. Time to get those welfare paperwork ready.

    3. Re:Study? by mbonig · · Score: 0

      and people laughed at me for saving my "sick days" and "vacation time"... who's laughing NOW! hl2 - pre-loaded halo 2 - pre-purchased knowing that your going to be playing video games while your boss cries that you aren't there: priceless (and a little bit of an ego boost)

    4. Re:Study? by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

      Other sweet games coming out in Nov. include Metroid Prime 2 Echoes (Nov 15th), Metal Gear Solid 3 (Nov 17th). I'm also interested in Medal of Honor: Pacific Assault (Nov 9th) since Allied Assault was so good, IMHO. GPA, shme-PA! I'm done school, so these games are going to screw over my stats!

    5. Re:Study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget World of Warcraft (In North America *grumble*)

    6. Re:Study? by dstyle5 · · Score: 1

      Oops, the bfstats link above is wrong. I meant this bfstats!

    7. Re:Study? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      Man my GPA is screwed.

      That's probrably the ONLY thing of yours getting screwed.

  10. Re:New Features by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    San Andreas introduces a host of new features that including eating food to survive...

    They don't mean new to gaming right? I can think of plenty of old RPG's that made you do this (the Early ultima's come to mind). What also comes to mind, is how annoying this was. No matter with GTA, all the fun in GTA is in putting in cheatcodes and randomly playing in the virtual crime sandbox. :)

  11. Australia? by Pan+T.+Hose · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is it legal to release Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas with its crime and violence apotheosis in Australia? I hope so, but does anyone know any formal decisions and rationale?

    --
    Sincerely,
    Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
    "Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
    1. Re:Australia? by drgath159 · · Score: 0

      Couldn't figure out why the radio in SA is ripping on Australia so much, but that's probably the reason why. Interesting, and funny.

  12. Re:Old news by d_jedi · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Thanks for the link!
    piracy@rockstar.com you go..

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  13. Not to mention... by Johnny+Fusion · · Score: 1
    Today G4/Tech Tv is having a "GTA: San Adreas Day"

    This is the one day I am glad Leo is gone... if he weren't I'd be praying he takes a sick-day.

    Where did I put that Bring Back Leo Petition...

    --
    There are two kinds of fool. One says, This is old, and therefore good. And one says, This is new, and therefore better.
  14. Hmm... by Sheetrock · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Although I'm probably going to be right out there with the rest of you picking this up, am I the only one that's a bit concerned about seeing all the parents buying the game for their kids?

    Supposedly the ESRB stuff is supposed to stop retailers from selling the game to people under 18, but I know that many parents don't have the time or the willpower to look into what media their children consume. And I know this series gets pretty bad, with things like picking up prostitutes, car theft, and massacre being rewarded in what some have termed a "pornography of violence".

    As fun as the game is, maybe this is something that should be hidden behind the counter or maybe only sold in adult venues/online. We all know where to find it, and we're old enough not to be profoundly affected by murder simulations, but apparently there are still a bunch of chuckleheads out there that are completely unable to determine what's appropriate for their kids. And society pays the price.

    I sure can't wait to play it, though.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If parents are buying it for their kids, what difference is putting it in adult-only venues going to make exactly?

    2. Re:Hmm... by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful
      • Although I'm probably going to be right out there with the rest of you picking this up, am I the only one that's a bit concerned about seeing all the parents buying the game for their kids?
      No you're not, I've seen the game and even as an adult find the level of language in this one to be disturbing. I'm not easily offended either, but the constant amount of cussing gets old fast. Even a lot of the NPC comments you hear going about the game world are more cuss-filled than in the last two GTA games. Perhaps it's authentic, but this is a case where I'd have liked a less-cussing option myself. I only saw it for a few hours and was already thinking that the mute button looked like a great idea.
      • Supposedly the ESRB stuff is supposed to stop retailers from selling the game to people under 18, but I know that many parents don't have the time or the willpower to look into what media their children consume. And I know this series gets pretty bad, with things like picking up prostitutes, car theft, and massacre being rewarded in what some have termed a "pornography of violence".
      Well the ESRB is working as it should in that case. If parents aren't willing to check into the game before they buy it for the kid, it's certainly not the ESRB or Rockstar's fault. You have to blame the parent there, it doesn't take much time to look at the package and see M (Mature) on it, then flip it over to see the sub warnings (which I'm sure include violence, adult language, adult situations, etc.) I worked at a Wal-mart for a few years in Electronics and I'd always point out that a game was Mature to parents in case they didn't realize it. Some parents didn't know about the ratings system (which is amazing as it's posted on every freaking game case at Wal-mart) and when they asked what it meant and found out they'd put it back and tell the kids they had to pick something else. Some would say "I know, I don't care" and buy the game for their 6yo. (Quite literally I saw someone buy Vice City for their 6yo.)

      But in any case there's a recent article that was in Computer Gaming World or Electronic Gaming Monthly one where they sent a young-looking 15yo kid into several stores to try to buy M rated games to see what happened. (They showed a picture of him, he looked about 12.) Some stores sold him M rated games without even blinking, others refused from the start. Unfortunately a lot of stores and/or employees don't even try to enforce the ESRB, providing fuel to the anti-gaming camp. :(

    3. Re:Hmm... by TykeClone · · Score: 1
      At some point people have to be responsible for their actions and realize that a game is just a game. A better question is if those who are buying and playing the game are more predisposed to violence than those who are not?

      But it's damn tempting to squeeze in between those lanes of traffic just ahead, and to strafe those slackers in the minivan...

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Hmm... by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is exactly how the system should work. This way, parents make the choice about what their kids watch/read/play, and it's up to them to decide how informed a choice this should be. I think plenty of "parenting" is already done by the government and industry in stopping sales to minors, there shouldn't be any regulation on a parent purchasing a game for their child.

    5. Re:Hmm... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, I'm sure all kinds of conservatives are way overworked about parents letting their kids have this game. But they're also overworked about them telling their kids the truth about drugs, sex, etc., and yet wouldn't have any problem with them allowing their children to see The Godfather or the like.

      If parents do their job passing their values in context and without sugar coating, then they can trust their children to make them, if not 'proud' then at least not ashamed. If parents simply say don't do this or that without addressing why they might want to in the first place, they're just asking for trouble.

      "Behind the Counter" is definitely not the solution - games get the MA rating merely for language in today's world. How is that worse then, say, American Pie's PG-13 completely irresponsible attitude towards teenage sex? At least Fast Times at Ridgemont High showed some negatives. Of course, it had to cut out a frontal shot of a penis to not get an XXX rating. Heaven forbid girls see one before their wedding night!

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    6. Re:Hmm... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Show me proof by someone that isn't biased towards banning any video game that is more adult than barny and that shows a trend of people who play video games are more violent. People being idiots and doing stupid stuff does not count. I and many people I know have been playing First Person Shooters since before we were 10 and have turned out better adjusted than many "normal" people I know. When you get that proof let me know and in the mean time quite trying to take away something that I like to do.

      Sure I know the difference betweent a frag and killing someone in real life. People who are fraged come back. You won't.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    7. Re:Hmm... by Osty · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I know that many parents don't have the time or the willpower to look into what media their children consume.
      As fun as the game is, maybe this is something that should be hidden behind the counter or maybe only sold in adult venues/online.

      Because some parents can't be bothered to take an active role in their childrens' lives, we should increase the nanny state and "hide" items like GTA? I'm sorry, but no. Besides, you said it yourself that parents are buying this, so what would hiding it serve? All the parents know is that little Billy wants "Grand Theft Auto: Something Or Other", and they're just going to ask the store clerk for "that Grand Theft thing". Hidden behind the counter or not, the parent is still going to buy it.

      If you really want to "think of the children," consider mandatory parenting classes for expecting families, free or low-cost birth control and abortions and sterilizations available to all, and incentives for sterilization ("You want an increase on your welfare check/a free country club membership/a large tax cut/a new car? Go get a vasectomy or tubaligation."). It's not my responsibility to parent the children of folks who should never have had kids in the first place, and I should not be punished for their inteptitude either (okay, hiding GTA behind a counter isn't much "punishment", but where do we stop?). That whole crap about taking a village to raise a child is bullshit. It takes two parents that care what their children are doing, and are not afraid to punish them as necessary. Anything less, and those people should never have had children in the first place.

    8. Re:Hmm... by Kazrath · · Score: 0

      Thanks, well said.

    9. Re:Hmm... by petsounds · · Score: 1

      When I walked by a local EB last night they were selling San Andreas early. Two ~12 year-old kids were standing in the line the EB employees had set up, waiting to buy it. Really made me angry because the EB employees had obviously done nothing to prevent their purchase.

    10. Re:Hmm... by celeritas_2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you have to understand that nearly everyone can tell the difference between playing a game and living their life. Games are also different than tv which appears to be equivalant to real life, when I'm playing I don't have to think about the suffering of my 'enemy' if i shoot him, because he's just a few ones and zeroes jumping around in my console. I'm still waiting for a repeatable _scientific_ study proving any significant change in behavior caused by game playing. Unless of course you think faster reactions and strong thumbs are a detrement to society :)

      --
      -- Checking emails and kicking cheats `till the day I die.
    11. Re:Hmm... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Normally I enjoy reading Slashdot, and your post seemed very insightful at first, but your constant use of "the" disturbed me to no end and I was completely unable to finish reading this thoroughly well thought-out post.

      Sorry, but I just cannot understand how people can be offended by words without considering context at all. Would a rose smell any less sweet if it were called a dingleberry*? Is the value of a thought to be judged by the words that express it?

      Further more, is deploring one's speech for its 'colorful idioms' any better than believing everyone should speak English, or French, or whatever? Both views hold the implication that one doesn't want to hear what one wouldn't say, so is there any distinction whatsoever?

      I would be willing to grant you that it is easier to evoke an emotional response with strong language then with strong arguments, and that with fights over ratings and money it's almost self-propagating between popular culture reflecting and shaping reality. But I prefer to judge a statement for itself and not by the words used to make it. Maybe it's the logical part of my mind asserting itself, but I have hopes that I'm not unique in this respect.

      In regards to GTA:SA, changing the language would be akin to air brushing out George Burns' cigars. The player is essentially role playing a character in an historical environment, and the language is part of it. Editing out specific words from a game with drive-by's, corrupt cops, drugs, etc. seems a little selective to me.

      * - I had a much better word to make my point the 'dingleberrys', but in the interest of a civil discourse I have edited myself.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    12. Re:Hmm... by danila · · Score: 1

      Let's look at this from the eyes of the kid. There are plenty of children who are smart, grown-up and developed enough at 6 years already to be able to play GTA without suffering permanent brain damage. Why shouldn't these kids be able to buy and play it?

      There is nothing wrong with picking up prostitutes (sex industry workers), it certainly isn't much worse than flirting and making out with a maid in Sims 2, not to mention adultery and other stuff, there is nothing wrong with sex, car theft is on par with carjacking in Halo, and massacre is only marginally worse than nuking a city in Civilization.

      I really don't understand why it should be sold under the counter, it's nothing special, really. If anything, I'd rather have NFS: Undeground banned, as gangstas listening to cool radio stations are infinitely better than retarded street racers.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    13. Re:Hmm... by Ill_Omen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not trying to flame, I think this is a valid discussion. I'm going to play Devil's Advocate here.

      Why should the EB employees try to prevent their purchase? Is there a law that regulates video game sales?

      A 12-year-old cannot hold a job. Any money that kid gets to purchase video games comes from parents (or friends and relatives on gift-giving occasions). If the parents of these kids don't care where the kids spend their money, why should the clerk at the game store?

      On the other hand, if EB decided to post a policy of not selling M rated games to people under 18, and not selling games rated T to kids under 13, I wouldn't have a problem with it. And if they did have that posted policy, then they should enforce it. I'm guessing there are two reasons they don't do this. First, they make money on kids with lazy parents, and two, they don't want to open themselves up to liability from litigious parents.

    14. Re:Hmm... by renderhead · · Score: 1

      When people use offensive language for impact or to add "meaning" to what they are saying, they would do well to remember that those words would have no effect at all if they offended nobody. It's pretty pretentious to say "it's all about the meaning of what I'm saying, people need to look past the words" when the meaning is affected by the words themselves and depends upon the fact that at least some people are offended by them.

      As for the "accuracy" argument, none of these characters actually existed or said any of the things that they say in the game. Unless you're quoting someone, you can make them say anything you want, so Rockstar was in no way obligated to include any particular language.

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    15. Re:Hmm... by IronChef · · Score: 1

      True story:

      My wife's best friend has a 9 year old kid. Kid and mom were over at mom's new boyfriend's place. While the adults were doing adult things, the Playstation 2 was babysitting the 9 year old. He was playing the boyfriend's copy of GTA Vice City. Until 5 in the morning. Unsupervised.

      Mom was mortified when she learned what was in the game, but I can just imagine how damn happy that kid must have been with that forbidden fruit.

    16. Re:Hmm... by phorm · · Score: 1

      What they really need is a label that states: "HEY MORON: if you're buying this game for your 12-year-old, that big shiney M in the corner means that it's adults only. When you buy it for him anyways and he pulls a shotgun on his classmate, don't blame us."

      ...not that I believe a game can be solely to blame for some screwed up kids, it's more likely that screwed up kids migrate to the game because it contains screwed-up behavior than otherwise. However, somebody will inevitably blame the next act of kidiocy on it, so be prepared...

    17. Re:Hmm... by ajservo · · Score: 1

      >I would be willing to grant you that it is easier to evoke an emotional response with strong language then with strong arguments

      You never read "To Kill a Mockingbird" then I suppose.

    18. Re:Hmm... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right! They should have had them speak French! I mean, it's not like they were going for a certain time (mid-90's) or place (Southern California)! And why are they mostly black males and not green, triple breasted alien women? They really cut out the sci-fi fans with that choice!

      Back to my main topic. It's pretty pretentious to judge one solely by their word choice, whether it's if they cuss, if the use mostly monosyllabic vs. polysyllabic words, or if the speak native American English vs. the broken English of a visiting foreigner. It's all elitist and self centered. If you translate, say, Dante's Inferno from his era's Italian to current American English it's one thing to say you captured the story line, and another entirely to believe nothing could have been lost in the process. (Many examples could be made for this, even the Bible's many translations. This just came to mind because it involved his writing in a three sentence rhyming structure that is impossible to do in English in an exact translation, so some of the overall effect is invariably lost. Think, Poe's The Raven into German. It may be good, but I don't think German could possibly pull off the feel of the original.)

      I'm not debating that some (or many) use whatever they think will get them attention and shock value; I'm debating that all words have meaning and they are sometimes part of the statement, not just an addition to it.

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    19. Re:Hmm... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Although I'm probably going to be right out there with the rest of you picking this up, am I the only one that's a bit concerned about seeing all the parents buying the game for their kids?

      I'm not. Should I be? It's fiction, and fiction doesn't hurt people. Just because Kip Kinkle loved Doom doesn't mean Doom made him kill his parents. It's more complicated than that. Supportive and involved parents are much more important than any video game, movie, book, or TV show. The world is a complex place, and the sooner someone is introduced to complexities the better they'll learn to handle them. I can't think of any reason any public information should be off limits to anyone of any age, race, gender, religion, or anything else.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Hmm... by GothChip · · Score: 1
      American Pie's PG-13 completely irresponsible attitude towards teenage sex?

      Were you watching the same movie I was? I thought not only was American Pie a lot more intelligent than I was expecting, it was also quite responsible. It's message is that having sex is not important and abstinance and waiting until you are ready is a lot more important than impressing your friends. If only more teenage films were like that.

    21. Re:Hmm... by Bedouin+X · · Score: 1

      Actually, to frag is a real-life term for killing. I think that the term is somehow derived from fragmentation grenade.

      --
      Dissolve... Resolve... Evolve...
    22. Re:Hmm... by Dizzle · · Score: 1

      Why is that book, amongst all others, considered so powerful? Was I missing something when I read it or is there just no meaning?

      --
      -Dizzle
      "I most likely AM so interested in myself."
    23. Re:Hmm... by ajservo · · Score: 1

      Okay, lord of the Flies then...
      Raise the Red Lantern.
      Great Expectations?

      My point's that there's people who have said a great many powerful things to inspire or convince people of a greater good. And not many of the ones that stand the test of time involved dropping racial slurs or having a Eazy-E knockoff constantly puff a joint like it's an oxygen tank, while making their point.

      That said, it's still a good game, but for different reasons for me I suppose.

    24. Re:Hmm... by Maestro4k · · Score: 2, Interesting
      • In regards to GTA:SA, changing the language would be akin to air brushing out George Burns' cigars. The player is essentially role playing a character in an historical environment, and the language is part of it. Editing out specific words from a game with drive-by's, corrupt cops, drugs, etc. seems a little selective to me.
      You certainly didn't read my post terribly well, I said I wasn't one to be easily offended, in fact I tend to offend sensitive people, I cuss like a sailor. Yet still, parts of San Andreas's language offended me.

      The more I think of it, the more I realize it wasn't the story/mission parts that bothered me. What was getting on my nerves was the constant random shit that you'd hear when walking/running/riding/driving/etc. A lot of it was beyond pointless, and it didn't help to establish a feel for the era/area. I'm quite sure that not all 1990s residents of Los Angelas cussed everytime they opened their mouth. Keep in mind not all the background chatter is caused by you, you'll hear NPCs yelling at each other as well. If it was only triggered by your rude/criminal actions it'd be understandable.

      Basically it feels more like Rockstar went overboard and the cussing has ended up being there for shock value, not authenticity. That alone is pretty offensive. In any case for someone like me who cusses as much, or more, than the game characters do to end up being sick of the constant cussing and want to mute it says a lot about how they've used it in-game. I simply don't get offended easily, and this is the first GTA game to manage to offend me. (Actually it's the first game or movie to offend me.) At this point I'll probably rent it to spend some more time with it and see if the gameplay overcomes what I've felt watching it (admittedly for only a few hours). Maybe I'll get used to it, but I don't know. I came away from that session not terribly interested in the game and I'd been looking forward to it for months and was excited as hell to get to see it the other night.

      And as far as having a less-cussing option, it's not the same. In this case you still get to present the work in its full glory, but for those less inclined to hear the language (or those sick of hearing it constantly) you can give them a break. After all would you rather stay true to your 'vision' or sell more games? Personally I think a game company would want to sell more games, if it tanks they'll lose money on it. (Granted that's not very likely with this series.) Air-brushing out George Burn's cigars would also be acceptable in the right context, say on a DVD that used multiple angles (or just came as a set with two versions) so that those that wanted to see it in its original format could, but those offended by smoking could also enjoy it. It's not censorship when the consumer is left with both options. After all nearly every movie release presents you with a choice of a modified movie (full screen) or one in its full original form (wide screen). Very few releases offer both versions in one package and I don't see many people saying that's a problem.

    25. Re:Hmm... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • What they really need is a label that states: "HEY MORON: if you're buying this game for your 12-year-old, that big shiney M in the corner means that it's adults only. When you buy it for him anyways and he pulls a shotgun on his classmate, don't blame us."
      Sadly it wouldn't work on all people. My experience as a Sysamdmin at a major university convinced me of that once and for all. Here I was running computer labs in the Electrical & Computer Engineering dept. You wouldn't expect stupid students there, but.... Routinely students wouldn't read posted rules (posted in every lab in multiple places, around a minimum of 10 copies in each lab as well as a copy on the doors), wouldn't read the account user agreement they signed (which had the same info on it), and would come to complain about something that had never been allowed and was clearly explained as unallowed and why on these forms. In fact it was the vast majority of them that did this. I came out of it realizing that most people just won't read the rules/can't be bothered to learn them on their own/etc. I have no clue why this is, but it's really disheartening, you can count on people never reading obvious things in front of them, even if it's in 12 foot tall red flashing letters.

      That also probably explains why some parents don't even know what the ESRB ratings are despite being posted all over the place in every game store/electronics dept. I've ever seen.

    26. Re:Hmm... by demi · · Score: 1

      Well, the general argument is that the video game industry doesn't need to be regulated by law because they do a good enough job themselves (by "industry" we're pretty much referring to publishers, distributors and retailers, I would think).

      I don't understand your statement, "If the parents of these kids don't care where the kids spend their money, why should the clerk at the game store?" Are you saying that a parent needs to follow their teenager around to check on where they spend their money, and if they don't they "don't care?" That's just silly.

      The fact is that there are things that are generally accepted to be for adults only, and it's reasonable to expect the purveyors of it to check with a child's parents before letting them have it. If the industry isn't responsible enough to do this itself, then yes, they do need to be required by a law to do so.

      Two subpoints (am I tiresome yet?): Is the issue really one of selling the game or playing it? That is, the child needs to play it somewhere, right? I have no problem with the expectation that I keep tabs on what my kid's playing in my home. If I didn't think there was enough supervision in a friend's home and it was becoming a problem, I might not let them visit, either. So that, actually, I think is a more effective argument against whether an ESRB-style rating and enforcement should be required by law. Then again, game boys and so forth--but the technology isn't there to put something that offensive on a GBA. Maybe not so far off, though.

      Secondly: I had quite a bit of money I earned myself when I was 12. I was a little unusual but not that much. But I certainly had enough to buy many toys and videogames.

      --
      demi
    27. Re:Hmm... by demi · · Score: 2, Insightful
      hiding GTA behind a counter isn't much "punishment", but where do we stop?

      Slippery slope arguments don't hold water. Where do we stop? We make sure we check with the parents of a child when we're planning on giving them things that are generally accepted to be adults-only. That's it. The idea that this is somehow onerous or restrictive is absurd.

      The fact is, parents aren't perfect. They make mistakes. Time and mental energy are at a premium when you are a parent. I know roughly what' s in the GTA games--and recently explained to a fellow parent, whose child had asked for it as a gift.

      They were going to buy it until I cautioned them otherwise. Guess what? That doesn't mean they "should never have had kids in the first place" or couldn't "be bothered to take an active role in their childrens' lives," it just means there was something they didn't know. Guess what? There's lots of things I don't know about being a parent. And my guess is that there are a lot of things you don't know about being a parent--all of it.

      --
      demi
    28. Re:Hmm... by qopax · · Score: 1

      thank you! it's so frustrating having people decide what is good for you or not. How will it be possible to play any great games when they're banned from you. Gaming industry is going to fail if all that the children below 18 are allowed to play are Sims 2 and Barney's ABC 123 learning superduper game, cause by the time they grow up, they'll be sick of games.

      Most awesome games have real life situations which teenagers are affected by as well. They don't grow up in a fantastical world with fairies, chu chu trains, and "what is sex?".

      by the time children are 10 or older, most likely games with real life content, wont permanently disturb them. It's impossible to judge though, and not all parents go and buy video games for their children, or even want to, especially 15 and 16 year olds which have their own money for those kinds of things. My parents never bought me a computer game as far as I can remember.

      im 15, and i'm not yet affected by that ESR rating system, mostly thanks to piracy, but I'd pity the future generations if they were so simply generalized.

      hehe, I love playing NFS:U by the way. Amazing driving game, without exotic cars you would probably never acquire.

      --
      I pwn this comment. "The Fine Print" says so.
    29. Re:Hmm... by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, the term originated in Vietnam, when shell-shocked soldiers would toss fragmentation grenades into their officer's tents or quarters.

    30. Re:Hmm... by Osty · · Score: 1

      Slippery slope arguments don't hold water. Where do we stop? We make sure we check with the parents of a child when we're planning on giving them things that are generally accepted to be adults-only. That's it. The idea that this is somehow onerous or restrictive is absurd.

      Should the clerk quiz the parent on the content of the game? The original poster implied, and you confirmed, that parents buy these games without any thought, and the way many games stores work it wouldn't really be a red flag that the game was behind the counter (most places lock up their games, or keep the actual game boxes behind the counter anyway so you have to ask them for what you want). It is a slippery slope, and we're already well down the slope with other nanny-state policies.

      The fact is, parents aren't perfect. They make mistakes. Time and mental energy are at a premium when you are a parent. I know roughly what' s in the GTA games--and recently explained to a fellow parent, whose child had asked for it as a gift.

      And I shouldn't be required to jump through hoops because your friend didn't care enough about his or her child to know what kinds of video games the kid likes. Besides, why did your friend need you to tell him what GTA contains? Can he not read the ESRB rating on the game box? Would this same friend allow his child to see an R-rated movie unattended because he didn't know it was an R-rated movie? (I'll laugh if you say theaters check for ages at admission, but to humor that possibility change this to "rent an R-rated movie" instead.)

      That doesn't mean they "should never have had kids in the first place" or couldn't "be bothered to take an active role in their childrens' lives," it just means there was something they didn't know. Guess what? There's lots of things I don't know about being a parent. And my guess is that there are a lot of things you don't know about being a parent--all of it.

      Not knowing "about being a parent" and not knowing what your child likes are two completely different things. That's the kind of attitude that leads to teen pregnancy ("I didn't know little Bobby was screwing Nancy down the block! I thought he was up in his room with the door closed, studying."), drug use ("Jimmy's friends were so nice, I never would've expected they'd be smoking the pot!"), street racing ("Johnny said he was going to the Dairy Queen for an ice cream. I didn't know that's where the rice bangers hang out, challenging each other to to street drag races!"), and so on. If you're going to be a parent, get involved!

      However, you're right about one thing -- I don't know about "being a parent", because I'm not one. I do know enough that I do not want to be one anytime soon, either, because I know I'm incapable of being involved in a child's life (I have a hard enough time being involved in my own life, at times!). Maybe that makes me "immature", but I prefer to think of it as "smart". I know my limitations, and there's no damned way I would bring a child into this world if I had to raise him. If more people considered that, this world would be better off.

      I have a couple of friends that recently got pregnant, and are getting married shortly. Why did they get pregnant before getting married? (she's actually showing, so it's not like she can hide it) Her mom was pregnant when she got married, and his mom was pregnant when she got married as well. Thus, they wanted to carry on the "grand tradition". To me, that screams, "SELFISH!" and I fear for the welfare of their child, but there's nothing I can do about it, nor will I (if they don't screw up, they won't learn -- sadly, it will involve the life of an innocent for them to learn).

      I have another couple of friends who recently got married. She's young (married before she was 21, even!), and he's not (moving into late-20s). She's not even fin

    31. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      * - I had a much better word to make my point the 'dingleberrys', but in the interest of a civil discourse I have edited myself.

      'Stench-blossoms'?

    32. Re:Hmm... by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Uh... then this obviously isn't the game for you.

      A game CENTERED around gangs and violence and you're saying that the level of language is too disturbing? Hahaha... ok then.

      You thinkg gangsters sit around a table and discuss things like, "Oh, that gosh darn Samuel. He's such a pill, that guy!" No, they'll say, "That muthafucka Sammy is a busta, he's gonna get beat the fuck down."

      Watch The Sopranos, Goodfellas, Menace II Society, Boyz N The Hood... were you disturbed by their profanity?

      Grow up... get real...

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    33. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess I'm a chucklehead because I let my 11 year old play it (and he has been playing GTA since he was 10). He plays it when I'm around, and it spurs conversations about violence, bad language and drugs. He has a great time, but he isn't so much into all the violence as he is the exploration, accomplishing missions, doing bike and car stunts, buying buildings, etc. Given a choice, he would pick Kingdom Hearts over GTA if he had to pick just one, so I think he has his head on straight. However, he has a friend I absolutely won't let play. He seemed to get waaaaaaay too much fun out of wielding the chain saw so I pulled the plug rather quickly. That kid enjoyed the violence in a very unhealthy way. I figure we can hide bad stuff from our kids, or we can educate them on how to deal with it. I chose the latter with my kid.

    34. Re:Hmm... by IOOOOOI · · Score: 1
      • Sheetrock (152993) said: "...am I the only one that's a bit concerned about seeing all the parents buying the game for their kids?"

      Could you elaborate on what you find concerning?

      • Maestro4k (707634) said: "You have to blame the parent there, it doesn't take much time to look at the package and see M (Mature) on it, then flip it over to see the sub warnings (which I'm sure include violence, adult language, adult situations, etc.) I worked at a Wal-mart..."

      I almost completely agree with you. Where we differ is in the setting. Your comment, and the quote above it, seem to come from the standpoint that the parents who are buying the games are either ignorant, or don't give a shit. There are more viewpoints than that.

      For example: a parent who heard the nightly news, read the game's label, perhaps researched the ESRB ratings and what they mean, and concluded that their 16 year old was mature enough to deal with it.

      Herin lies the beast within arbitrary ratings systems such as this and the movie ratings. They become easy fodder for the FUD mills.

    35. Re:Hmm... by IOOOOOI · · Score: 1
      • Sheetrock said:
      • "...am I the only one that's a bit concerned about seeing all the parents buying the game for their kids?"

      Could you elaborate on what you find concerning?

      • Maestro4k said:
      • "You have to blame the parent there, it doesn't take much time to look at the package and see M (Mature) on it, then flip it over to see the sub warnings (which I'm sure include violence, adult language, adult situations, etc.) I worked at a Wal-mart..."

      I almost completely agree with you. Where we differ is in the setting. Your comment, and the quote above it, seem to come from the standpoint that the parents who are buying the games are either ignorant, or don't give a shit. There are more viewpoints than that.

      For example: a parent who heard the nightly news, read the game's label, perhaps researched the ESRB ratings and what they mean, and concluded that their 16 year old was mature enough to deal with it.

      Herin lies the beast within arbitrary ratings systems such as this and the movie ratings. They become easy fodder for the FUD mills.

    36. Re:Hmm... by Jeff+Kelly · · Score: 1

      "(...) and incentives for sterilization ("You want an increase on your welfare check/a free country club membership/a large tax cut/a new car? Go get a vasectomy or tubaligation."). It's not my responsibility to parent the children of folks who should never have had kids in the first place, and I should not be punished for their inteptitude either"

      If you'd have posted this comment in a german forum or a forum where there are human rights activists or african americans you would be flamed for your comment 'till kingdom come.

      You do realise that the idea to provide such "incentives" for abortion and sterilisation isn't new and that such incentives were often provided by racist or fascist governments all over the world to keep "unworthy life" from reproducing itself?

      I'd not trust a country which heeds violence more than nudity to make these incentives anything more than a way to keep poor people from having kids. Hell I'd not even trust my own country.

      Where would you draw the line? Not so long ago governments actually paid to have drug addicts, handicapped persons, poor people, aborigines, people with african heritage and all other kinds of "unworthy life", who were deemed unsuitable for raising children, sterilized. More often than not against their will.

      I wouldn't trust your judgement as to who is a good parent and who isn't and I wouldn't even trust my own judgement on this matter. But at least I know my history and every country which had such policies abused them to eliminate certain unwanted elements from the gene-pool. Either by using money or force.

      All in all every parent should have access to parenting classes, child care facilities should be everywhere and be affordable (because when you need three jobs to survive you simply cannot care enough for your child), contraceptives should be provided at low or no cost, hell even legalize abortion if you have to (we Europeans did at least). Everything else should be the free choice of the people concerned and this choice shouldn't be influenced by some kind of "incentive" because as history has shown many times over, this sooner or later leads to blackmailing people into doing things they otherwise wouldn't have done.

      See the Apartheid regime (colored people), Nazi germany ("unworthy life"), The United states prior to 1950 (african americans), Australia (handicapped people and aborigines), Holland (handicapped people and mentally ill people) etc. etc.

      Jeff

    37. Re:Hmm... by Mojojojo+Monkey+Inc. · · Score: 1

      I had a paper route when I was 12, and I used the earnings mostly to buy comic books and baseball cards, but also some Nintendo games. Had M-rated Nintendo games been available, I probably would have been fascinated enough to try to purchase one and try to play it when my parents weren't home from work yet, specifically *because* "I'm not supposed to have it" -- the same logic that applies to wanting Playboys and scrambled cable channels.

      So, you say "The parents gave their kid some money to buy *something*, so they must not care what he acually buys". You could apply this logic to booze and cigarettes too, if the parent gave the kid money, they must not care if he goes out and gets ripped, but this isn't true of course.

      Then again, alcohol & tobacco are federally regulated whereas movies, music, and videogames are not, they're self-regulated by the industry that creates them. I'm curious, is pornography mostly self-regulated, or is it covered by federal laws as well?

    38. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simple buddy. They're NOT your kids. Don't use the claim of "good for society" to back it up either.

      Playing a game is not a crime. Committing a crime against you (for whatever motivation) is (gasp!) the real offense.

    39. Re:Hmm... by renderhead · · Score: 1

      Maybe it is more "accurate" to use more cussing (and maybe it's not-- I didn't live in Southern California in the mid-90s), but accuracy is not the end goal of entertainment. If it were, most movie dialogue would be in overlapping sentence fragments and Romeo and Juliet would be Shakespeare's greatest play in Italian. The idea is to communicate with your audience in a way that helps them better understand the story or mood that you're trying to convey. If you're going to use foul language in a game (or book or movie or song) for American audiences, you have to acknowledge from the start that it's offensive to at least some of your audience. It's whining to say "but it's essential to the meaning!" You'll have actually compromised your meaning by putting off your audience, and that's a failing of you as an entertainer, not of the audience.

      My original point still stands: four-letter words are intended to offend, so you shouldn't get all high-and-mighty when people are offended by them.

      --
      I wish that my inferiority complex were as good as yours.

      -RenderHead

    40. Re:Hmm... by pogle · · Score: 1

      I saw a 12yr old asking his mom to buy a copy of the game at Best Buy last night. She told him firmly he's not getting Grand Theft Auto. I wish more parents would do that kind of thing, as she seemed knowledgeable of the appropriate age level for the game.

      And, since that was the last copy in the store, her making him put it down let me get it instead. Score!

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    41. Re:Hmm... by pogle · · Score: 1

      I guess I should quantify my statement that she knew appropriate age levels: I was within earshot of them for a while and she rebuffed every attempt of his to get an adult oriented game, while not minding the PG-13s so much.

      Responsible parenting, go figure.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    42. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'It's whining to say "but it's essential to the meaning!"'

      I don't know if I'm arguing with you here, but immersion is the priority, not "meaning".

    43. Re:Hmm... by kdmstanton · · Score: 1

      A rose by any other name would still smell like the sex organ of a thorny weed. I agree whole-heartedly, people need to be less shocked that this type of material is being marketed (when so many people lived (and still live) their lives in just such an enviroment, and take responsibility for keeping the game out of their own (and their children's) consoles, and let those of us who want to play the game play the game.

    44. Re:Hmm... by lazyl · · Score: 1

      Is the value of a thought to be judged by the words that express it?

      First of all, don't confuse the issue. Nobody is judging the 'thought' itself. Just the words. You yourself argue that thoughts and words aren't the same ('a rose by any other name...') but then you flip 180 and assume that someone who is offended by the words is somehow judging the 'thought'. I think your entire opinion was biased by this confusion.

      Sorry, but I just cannot understand how people can be offended by words without considering context at all.

      It's simple. People are different. The speaker and the listener have different meanings for those words.

      The meaning a person assigns to words comes not only from the dictionary but also from his own personality and culture. You're of the belief that the listener should abondon his own interpretation of the word and use the speaker's. People can do that to a degree, but there is often a limit. A person is who he is; and that defines the meaning of those words for him. You can't change that.

      Criticizing someone for being offended by those words is not so very different from criticizing someone for folowing a religion that you think is stupid. It's a attack on who they are and what they believe in beacuse it's different from you.

      Cultures are not always compatible. Some cultures offend other cultures. Neither is wrong. Get used to it.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    45. Re:Hmm... by mzipay · · Score: 1

      > am I the only one that's a bit concerned about
      > seeing all the parents buying the game for
      > their kids?

      not at all. but you can't count on parents to even be *aware* of the esrb rating. unfortunately, you can't even count on them appreciating its existence, or your willingness to explain it. here's a true story:

      when i was standing in line a couple years ago to purchase VC, i noticed a mother and her son in line behind me, the mother with VC in hand. her son looked to be no more than 7 years old. i hesitated for moment, but then turned to the woman and said, "excuse me, would you by chance be purchasing that game for your son?" she confirmed that she was. i then said, "i'm not sure if you're aware, but this game has very adult content - sex, guns, violence, cursing, drugs, pornography..." she looked horrified. she thanked me profusely for having informed her. i also gave her a quick description of the esrb system. she got out of line and began looking for a different game for her son.

      feeling i had done a good deed, i turned to resume my wait in line, only to be tapped on the shoulder by another mother in line with her son (who looked to be around 10 years old). i was treated to a tongue lashing about how arrogant i was to have presumed that i could lecture the first mother and "force" my opinion on her, and how i have no right to speak in the manner i did unless i have children myself AND am directly solicited for my opinion.

      can't win 'em all, i guess.

    46. Re:Hmm... by solipsiae · · Score: 1
      What was getting on my nerves was the constant random shit that you'd hear when walking/running/riding/driving/etc. A lot of it was beyond pointless, and it didn't help to establish a feel for the era/area. I'm quite sure that not all 1990s residents of Los Angelas cussed everytime they opened their mouth.

      While I doubt your ability to ascertain that "not all 1990s residents of Los Angelas [sic] cussed everytime they opened their mouth," I'll state that I didn't live in LA in the '90s either, so I can't really say one way or the other. Keep in mind, though, that it's not just LA that's being represented here -- it's different ("fictionalized") suburbs or subsections of a time and a place. Sure, some things'll be exaggerated. But if you listen to enough gangsta rap from the 90s (when "G-funk" was in its infancy, getting bigger) a lot of the NPC interaction as well as what CJ says while/after shooting people seem to be consistent with how the "gangsta" life was portrayed in popular media back in the 90s.

      I think it's pretty authentic. And that is what comes off as frightening and/or offensive to me -- the aggressive taunting, the constant threats. It's not gratuitious word-choice that's at fault here, but gratuitously violent/hateful phraseology.

      I hope I made that last word up!

    47. Re:Hmm... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      I've seen the game and even as an adult find the level of language in this one to be disturbing. I'm not easily offended either, but the constant amount of cussing gets old fast.

      In my mind, that's a good thing. With all the cussing in the game, parents might actually overhear it, be shocked, then actually take an interest in their childs growth. If it wasn't for the cussing, 90%+ of parents wouldn't have even noticed what their children were doing.

      Oh, and if you think that the cussing was more offensive than all the killing, then I'd say you have a pretty messed up moral system. You can pop a cap, but as long as you don't pop it in someones ass no one compains!

    48. Re:Hmm... by thegrue76 · · Score: 1

      http://m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary& va=phraseology&x=20&y=17

      Sorry. :)

    49. Re:Hmm... by thegrue76 · · Score: 1

      And then there's me and my lack of URL-fu. Right.

    50. Re:Hmm... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      And your original point is still elitist. If I say my tooth hurts like hell, it's to convey that I am in a great deal of pain but in a concise manner. If you choose to get offended it's your hang-up.

      To be more broad (and possibly more constructive), in a country as large as America anyone could be offended by anything. I find the phrase "God bless America" offensive on numerous levels. Conjugate the verb - bless in this phrase is an order. Is it right to order God? Which God? Why just America? What if you believe God doesn't get involved in the life of mortals? It's an amazingly elitist phrase that's impossible to avoid these days.

      Is your offense at essentially random words more important than people that are offended by this? Or would you rather nothing that could possibly offend anyone should be uttered, so we should all live in dark caves by ourselves to avoid accidently offending someone?

      Or do you think I'm being petty, because who could possibly be offended by such an uplifting message?

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    51. Re:Hmm... by smcavoy · · Score: 1

      I thought not only was American Pie a lot more intelligent than I was expecting,
      ok first off you were expecting some intelligence, second you saw some redemeing social values in it?
      Fuck.

    52. Re:Hmm... by burns210 · · Score: 1

      I am undecided if I would bappy or horrified if your were my parent.

      But I do agree, raing the false levels of censorship wouldn't do anything, the parents are the ones that need to take care of their kids, not the government's rules imposed on businesses.

  15. Best holiday season in gaming history by SilentChris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is shaping up to be the best holiday season in gaming history, from a breadth of titles standpoint. Tons of great games for all kinds of systems (some which have been in development forever).

    Halo 2
    Metroid Prime 2
    GTA: San Andreas
    Half-Life 2
    World of Warcraft

    I've been playing for years, and this is the first holiday season I can truely say "Where am I going to find the time/money for all the good games?" Other years we've had one or two blockbusters, but this years there's a ton.

    1. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by hollismb · · Score: 1

      Ghost Recon 2 comes out November 30th-ish too. Definitely on my must-have list.

    2. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have to agree. Never have I been anticipating this many good games...

      Some games I plan on buying for sure:

      GTA: San Andreas
      Half-Life 2
      World of Warcraft
      Sid Meier's Pirates (Remake of the classic pirates!)

    3. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by bludstone · · Score: 1

      You forgot to list the new Prince of Persia game.

      Probably the 2nd most underrated game of 2003, after Beyond Good and Evil, which if you havnt played I suggest picking it up ASAP. I think its only 20$ new and a very _very_ brilliant game. (both titles made by the same folks, btw)

      --

      no .sig
    4. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by holzp · · Score: 1

      Dude, I like Halloween too, but I dont give out games for it, just candy.

    5. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

      BG&E was a great game. They had it completely set up for a sequel. However, due to poor sales, I doubt we will ever see one.

    6. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by mollace · · Score: 3, Informative

      With the exception of World of Warcraft, these are all sequels. They may all be great games, but where are the original ideas?

    7. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      They're out there, but these are games that are practically guaranteed to be heavy hitters.

    8. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by psetzer · · Score: 1
      People here seem to think that innovation is good for its own sake. It can be, but when dealing with a product, sometimes taking the original and tweaking it can provide a better gaming experience. Fred Brooks mentioned in The MMM that you should consider building one to throw away. Now, some companies, like Blizzard, can afford to toss something that doesn't work out perfectly, but now, we get it in an earlier game in some series.

      Games evolve over time, and new features have to debut in some game or another. If I recall correctly, true locational sound debuted in Hexen. If we stopped development of artillery type games at Gorillas, then we would never have gotten Scorched Earth. It wasn't really innovative, but it was still fun as hell. Many concepts and genres began with some obscure game that few people played.

      Sequels allow a company to take some system to its logical conclusions. San Andreas is the culmination of a line of evolution to make the ultimate thug game. You can see how interior areas became more important in each of the sequels, as the game tries to make more and more of a real city. The innovations come in small leaps, like food, exercise, motorcycles, and the ability to jump out of moving cars. That's where the innovation is, not making some whole new genre every three months.

      --
      "Anyone who attempts to generate random numbers by deterministic means is living in a state of sin." -- John von Neumann
    9. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by dcam · · Score: 1

      Don't forget S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

      --
      meh
    10. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cry*

      Dont say that. A part of me still hopes.

      Thorax and a bog?
      Two sacks and a log? ...susan? /wishes The Tick was on DVD

    11. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is not one, but TWO BG&E sequels rumoured to be in the works. Some EGM article I read said that. Or maybe someone else.

      The Tick is already out on DVD.

    12. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by cgenman · · Score: 1

      With the exception of World of Warcraft, these are all sequels. They may all be great games, but where are the original ideas?

      How do you know an original idea game is going to be great until after it has launched? How about adding to that list

      Katamari Damachi
      Eyetoy: Antigrav
      Donkey Konga

      Admittedly, if you look at the latest Game Developer magazine most of the major publishers spend less than 30% of their budgets on original IP, but they exist. This might not be such a bad idea, when great original titles like Black and White sell terribly. Of course Prince of Persia sold terribly as well, despite being A: a sequel B: an awesome game C: heavily advertised. On the other hand Prince of Persia is full of original ideas, it just happened to be a sequal, in the same way that Super Mario Brothers 2 was a sequel to Super Mario Brothers 1.

      Look for originality. Buy originality. Promote originality. Stop complaining about a lack of originality. We make all that we can. The rest is in the hands of the consumers who bother to look for the good stuff, and tell other people about it.

    13. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Lord of the Rings: Battle for Middle-earth, you insensitive clod!

    14. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the animated show, not the live action.

    15. Re:Best holiday season in gaming history by bludstone · · Score: 1

      News: Beyond Good & Evil Trilogy
      By Ash - Jul 29th 2004 16:40

      Despite unexpectedly low sales Ubisoft do not plan on letting Beyond Good and Evil fade away and have announced there will be another two games.

      In a recent interview Ubisoft confirmed that there will be another two Beyond Good & Evil games, making the series into a trilogy.

      Apparently the ending for the first game was left rather ambiguous because they had planned on carrying on the story, good news for all Beyond Good & Evil fans.

      Update

      Further websites seemed determined to prove us wrong and according to "sources" there are no games in development and Ubisoft were simply saying they planned to release three games but it seems less likely now. Sorry for any confusion.

      --

      no .sig
  16. First AAA title? by chamblah · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I don't think that GTA:SA is the first AAA title of the year(it is October).

    A few titles immediately come to mind are Doom 3, Unreal Tournament 2004 and even Sims 2.

    If you are meaning fist AAA title to come out for the console, you might be right. I don't follow console releases very closely. But I think that Fable probably fits into that area.

    Please keep in mind that there are games that are released on the PC & Mac as well. Consoles are not the only gaming market out there.

    1. Re:First AAA title? by Maul · · Score: 1

      What constitutes AAA titles?

      I think FF:CC, Four Swords Adventures, and Tales of Symphonia for the Cube are awesome. Doom 3 and Farcry for the PC both kick ass too.

      --

      "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

    2. Re:First AAA title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consoles are not the only gaming market out there.

      If you go by sales, they might as well be.

    3. Re:First AAA title? by Bluejay42 · · Score: 1

      Doom 3 was definitely a AAA title for PC.

      Madden 2005 and ESPN NFL 2K5 are considered some of the best console games ever (definitely AAA).

      Burnout 3, a console game released last month, received incredible reviews.

      GameRankings.com

      Halo 2 and Gran Turismo 4 are the next 2 anticipated killer console games for 2005.

    4. Re:First AAA title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are these consoles that you speak of?

    5. Re:First AAA title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Doom 3 was definitely a AAA title for PC."

      By default.

    6. Re:First AAA title? by iabervon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see what GTA:SA has to do with AAA, and maybe Sims 2, but Doom 3 and Unreal Tournament 2004?

    7. Re:First AAA title? by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      You don't have a Gamecube do you?. From Pikmin 2 to Tales of Symphonia, it has been a pretty good year. The latest Paper Mario just came out last week, and Metroid Prime:Echoes comes out this November. On PS2 you are also missing Metal Gear Solid 3, which will come earlier than GT4 IIRC.

    8. Re:First AAA title? by chamblah · · Score: 1
      Well Unreal Tournament 2004 does have vehicles in it.

      And Doom3 had drivable trams in it. Do those qualify?

    9. Re:First AAA title? by glwtta · · Score: 1
      Doom 3 was definitely a AAA title for PC.

      How does being a "AAA title" comport with sucking? Doom3 was very pretty, but it was just about the most generic game ever made.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    10. Re:First AAA title? by coolmadsi · · Score: 0

      don't think that GTA:SA is the first AAA title of the year(it is October).

      They probably mean first of 2005. Things like this always happen, by december or january they will have 'Guninnis Book of Records - 2005' before anyone gets a chance to break a record that year. Same with compliation CD's, well, in the UK anyway.

      People are stupid nowadays

    11. Re:First AAA title? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      by december or january they will have ' Guninnis Book of Records - 2005'
      People are stupid nowadays
    12. Re:First AAA title? by coolmadsi · · Score: 0

      You must be pretty sad to insult somebody by pointing out the most miniscule spelling mistakes. Whats next, correcting my grammer? Damn Anonymous Cowards.

      Anyway, come to think of it, I cant remember there being almost any games for the PS2 this year that have been good, well, they must have relesaed some pretty crap ones if I cant remember any of them anyway.

  17. Los Angeles - Compton (LAC) Add-on on its way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you think this is great, you should see the LAC Add-on, it offers simultaneous multiple weapons firing (two handed gang bang drive by style) and many other goodies! Due out in April (a buddy of mine is a designer at Rockstar Games).

    1. Re:Los Angeles - Compton (LAC) Add-on on its way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Izzat you Gupta? Where ya been budday? Now FOAD. TY HAND.

    2. Re:Los Angeles - Compton (LAC) Add-on on its way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a sim where we can just drop a bomb on that shithole and make this country a better place?

      I can see the headlines now: "Compton wiped out. National average IQ raised by 5 points"

  18. Re:New Features by spoonyfork · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Anti-social behavior aside, GTA3 is one of the best console games I've ever played. Stike that. I think the anti-social content in GTA3 makes it one of the best console games in recent history. It is truly a classic. You owe it to yourself to barrow a copy and drive around for a bit.

    Vice City, while enjoyable, is just a variation on the theme. GTA is the rilla.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
  19. Re:New Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What next? Have to run around the corner to pee? What does eating matter to a game like this? Pointless.

  20. yay by ColonBlow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I got tired boning and killing the same old hookers.

    --
    free online diet tracking.
    1. Re:yay by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 1

      Did you try killing them in different ways perhaps?

  21. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks for the link!
    piracy@rockstar.com you go..

    You're not the police and not here to help As5croft and Bush go after those "evil pirates". Mind your own business, facist.

  22. Not just more of the same by thesandtiger · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've played it, and at first expected it to be just more beating the crap out of random passerby and screaming "Git' out tha car, byotch!" at the screen.

    Fortunately, it isn't - I found the main game much more interesting than the previous two, so it'll probably have a longer play-life for me.

    I have to admit being surprised that they've managed to keep it mostly fresh - it seems like people can't make a sequel without fucking up the mojo these days.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    1. Re:Not just more of the same by Jagasian · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I have played the GTA series since the original was released for DOS in 1998. Most people don't realize this, but the game has been basically the same thing since the original GTA. The basic formula has not changed at all with one exception (multiplayer), only the presentation has improved.

      The graphics and sound have dramatically improved, multiplayer has been dropped, and the game has been split and sold in separate chunks... yes the first GTA had Liberty City, Vice City, and San Andreas all in one!

      Most people probably never got past Liberty City in the original game, so it was wise to split them up... oh and creating content for the GTA3 series is allot harder than doing so for the GTA1 series.

      It really bothers me how much gamers and critics ignored the first GTA. Critics bagged it as a gimmic and gamers ignored it. Hell, the Gamespot reviewer of GTA3: San Andreas even goes as far as to say


      the concept of a multiplayer mode in GTA is pretty mind-blowing


      when multiplayer has been in GTA since 1998. Just imagine if movie critics were this ignorant of history. "The concept of a non-linear storyline in a movie is pretty mind-blowing"! Yup, they would be laughed at. I guess the game industry still has allot of growing up to do.
  23. Cool! by d_jedi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad it'll be several months till I'll be able to play it.. damn PS2 only releases!

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
    1. Re:Cool! by Sefert · · Score: 1

      I can't find the release date for the PC. Do you know it?

    2. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      probably may, like gta3&vc

  24. Re:Good indeed by RonnyJ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    And it's already getting rave reviews from customers over here.

    On Amazon, it almost certainly got numerous rave 'reviews' months before the code was actually completed.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. GTA Source by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love the GTA series, and I keep thinking that it could be the next 'doom' if rockstar would open up the .exe source code for modders. Even if it was something older like GTA3, there is no end to what could be done with a game like this by the mod community.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:GTA Source by NightWulf · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well they might, but not for a while. San Andreas is technically GTA 3.2. They use the same GTA 3 engine. Think of Vice City and San Andreas as large expansion packs. Possibly when GTA 4 comes out on the new consoles with a new engine, they might open up the old code, since by then it won't be a big issue.

    2. Re:GTA Source by TykeClone · · Score: 2, Funny

      You could have GTA3:Grand Forks! And you replace the fast cars with tractors and cows! Think about it - you could be a "cattle rustler".

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    3. Re:GTA Source by okayplayer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those crazy modder don't need our help...

      Multi-Theft Auto http://www.mtavc.com/

      So go play your online GTA and stop bugging us to change the opus that has been created.

      Actually I've spent a couple of good hours on MTAVC and have enjoyed it... Personally I think the GTA series is what it is because of the stories. They work well with 1 "hero/villan" not with 40,000 of them running around causing chaos.

      --
      What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
    4. Re:GTA Source by okayplayer · · Score: 5, Informative

      And while many are saying that the engine in SA is the same as the one in VC and III, this isn't quite true. The engine has been modified greatly to allow for the much larger, fully streamed (no loading no matter where you travel) huge map.

      For example now a "tree" like system is used for drawing in the various levels of details rather than the linear system that was used in the previous games. Yes, the look of the game is similar, but it is certainly a greatly improved engine to handle the new game's massive size. I mean you wouldn't say that an AMG V8 is the same engine as that honda 4 cyl would you?

      --
      What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
    5. Re:GTA Source by Dunarie · · Score: 1

      To my understanding, it's not that huge of a mod. From what I hear, all the multiplayer code was already in the game, it's just that Sony told Rockstar to not go ahead with the multiplayer mode (for various reasons), so instead of taking out all the code, they just disabled it. All MTA does is re-enable the multi-player mode, along with a few other small things.

      Or so I've been told.

    6. Re:GTA Source by okayplayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At the risk of taking the credit away from us and putting it where it belongs... Those guys did the work. And good work they did.

      Sony had nothing to do with it. And even if they tried to give direction to a GTA, do you think Rockstar would listen?

      --
      What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
    7. Re:GTA Source by bleckywelcky · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have been told wrong. The multiplayer capability is completely original to the creators of MTA. The bad thing about MTA is the rampant cheating. I cracked one program back around 1999 just to learn how to do it and haven't really done much since. After an hour or so of research and loading up some utilities, I was able to crack the MTA executable in about 1 hour. From here, you can basically use the normal GTA config files (that you would modify to change how the game works in single player) and modify them for use in MTA. It's really very easy, and too many people have either done it themselves or provided a crack for others to use that can't figure it out - so every other person in MTA is probably cheating with some speed modifications or something.

    8. Re:GTA Source by lost_it · · Score: 1
      Buy GTA:SA - Pay My Salary

      Gladly... unfortunately I can't stand playing games on consoles. I tried playing GTA:VC on a friend's PS2 (I own GTA3 for the PC), and I just couldn't do it. I'm too used to aiming with the mouse, and the crappy resolution of a TV just doesn't cut it.

      That said, I look forward to contributing to your paycheck when GTA:SA comes out for the PC. I'll probably have to buy a new computer (or at least a new video card), but I'm sure it'll be worth it.

    9. Re:GTA Source by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      As someone who lived in Grand Forks for 20 years, I can assure you we have nothing so exciting as cattle here. The tractors, sure.. but thats just for wheat and sugar beets.

      On the plus side it would be fun to play GTA on an Icy street.

    10. Re:GTA Source by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GTA3 and up all use the Renderware engine, licensed by Criterion (who is now owned by EA). So Rockstar would need EA's position to release the source...which kind of seems unlikely to me.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    11. Re:GTA Source by Kent+Simon · · Score: 1

      thats a common rumor which is entirely untrue. we've had to write the entire netcode backbone for MTA.. as well as spend a lot of time disassembling and reversing code to get to the point we are at now.

      --
      Kent Simon Multitheft Auto
    12. Re:GTA Source by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Your right on the ice. I used to have the "Indy Racing" game on the Atari 2600 and the best game on it was the ice race.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    13. Re:GTA Source by Nf1nk · · Score: 1

      Too late... I jacked a tractor IN GTA:SA last night. No really

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
    14. Re:GTA Source by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      Damn - knew I should have patented it!

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
  27. don't forget... by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2, Informative

    Knights of the Old Republic 2 (which, together with San Andreas and Halo 2) is one of the games I've been looking forward the most to.

    I have to say that this year there are way better games coming out for consoles than for PCs, at least from a single player perspective.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  28. Re:New Features by oni · · Score: 1

    What does eating matter to a game like this?

    I guess it's just something else to do to pass the time. You know, depth.

  29. Started playing last night...best GTA ever! by Flagellan · · Score: 3, Informative

    My local Game Stop started handing out pre-ordered copies last night. Well, I haven't had much sleep but I can lucidly say this game rocks! Huge environment, many many sub-games, really too much to take in overnight...maybe even over a week. Now if Bungie could just hurry up with Halo 2 and Valve with Half-Life 2...my year would be complete. Job...what job?

    --
    Stop pummeling me, it's really painful...
    1. Re:Started playing last night...best GTA ever! by burns210 · · Score: 1

      Are the graphics and game feel improved much, or is really just the GTA3 engine with some new features and a touch up?

      I have played GTA3, loved it. Missed almost entirely Vice City, but am planning on buying a PStwo(the mini one) shortly with San Andreas.

  30. Wake me when the PC version ships... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    ZZZzzzz...

    1. Re:Wake me when the PC version ships... by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this bullshit of screwing over the PC customers who made the original GTA and GTA2 a big thing is starting to piss me off. I think TakeTwo is driving the decision though. Because they know that they can release the PS2 version now, and the PC version in a year, and both releases will experience record-breaking sales. So they span the releases out so that they have at least 1 big title for next year to report on their earnings statement. Bunch of bull plop if you ask me ...

    2. Re:Wake me when the PC version ships... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or they don't want to use the resources required to port a game to a platform which might sell 10% of what the PS2 will.

  31. Re:But...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many PS2 games are you running on your Linux box?

  32. Re:But...? by gral · · Score: 1

    It's possible...

    http://www.pcsx2.net/index.php

    --
    Scott Carr
  33. Re:New Features by qlippoth · · Score: 2, Informative

    Taken from gamefaqs.com:

    if you eat too much, you get fat. Eat too little, you go gaunt and lose stamina. Work out a lot early in the game to build up some nice guns and just go back every once in a while. Treadmills and the Stationary Bike remove fat and impove stamina, while a bench and dumbells just increase muscle. More muscle, more stamina, and less fat are all very good things. Work out in gyms and in dojos to improve your fighting,running,and biking abilities.

    --
    Mmmm, -funroll-loops
  34. Re:New Features by SilentChris · · Score: 1

    "What next? Have to run around the corner to pee?"

    Yes, but in this game if you pee on another guy's territory, "gangstas" will be on your ass so fast... it's a strategy game, you see?

  35. Re:New Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess it's just something else to do to pass the time. You know, depth.

    So you are saying that they couldn't program enough depth in the game (as in missions, story line, etc) itself? Maybe they need to add an arcade in the game which the character can play on when the player is bored of the story line. I heard Dance Dance Revolution is good.

  36. The mall was insane last night... by NightWulf · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Happened to be in the local mall last night to find out GameStop and EBX were going to start selling at 8pm that night. There were roughly 3000 people waiting online between the two stores. I love GTA but yeesh, you think people would have better things to do, considering I walked right in this morning and picked up a copy.

    Wait time for line losers= 5 hours

    Wait time for me=5 minutes

    1. Re:The mall was insane last night... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 1

      Huh; must not be too many options where you live. I only waited 15 minutes, and there maybe 100 people tops. But this is at one store in one mall in Pittsburgh; I have no idea how the other store in the mall did or any of the other hundreds of stores around here.

      Play time before you played = 5 hours; and that's only because I have a job and couldn't stay up all night. Of course, I work from home and snuck some in at lunch, but don't tell anyone!

      --
      R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
    2. Re:The mall was insane last night... by micromoog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps some of the "line losers" remember events like when Super Mario Bros. 2 came out for NES. The wait time for that, after the first run sold out, was more like 5 weeks.

    3. Re:The mall was insane last night... by Psychotext · · Score: 1

      Thankfully it's slightly easier to mass duplicate DVDs than it is hard plastic cases filled with circuitry!

      --
      People that believe in their opinions don't post AC.
  37. Eating? by KenwoodTrueX · · Score: 1, Funny
    LOL, you have to eat? Whats next, having to go the bathroom?=) AH MY BLADDER METER IS FULL!

    Free Flat Screen HERE!

    1. Re:Eating? by Kane-Sama · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of 'How to be a Complete Bastard'

    2. Re:Eating? by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      Provide link please... for research... yeah... that lie will work...

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    3. Re:Eating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, here's a walkthrough for it..

    4. Re:Eating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, you spamming piece of shit.

      MOD SPAMMER DOWN

    5. Re:Eating? by Kane-Sama · · Score: 1

      http://www.ysrnry.co.uk/articles/howtobeacompleteb astard.htm

    6. Re:Eating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never heard of The Sims??

    7. Re:Eating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you haven't played the Sims!

    8. Re:Eating? by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

      That'd be funny as hell. Plus if it gets full you'd piss your pants then none of the hookers would even have anything to do with you.

      Maybe people would mistake you for a bum to and start throwing money at you. Good way to make a buck if you ask me.

  38. Re:New Features by smclean · · Score: 5, Funny
    In diku muds you don't really die if you don't eat, you just lose the ability to regenerate your hit, movement, and mana points. Same with thirst.

    God, did I really just bother pointing that out?

    --

    "'Yrch!' said Legolas, falling into his own tongue."

  39. Re:Old news by hollismb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You're the dumbass that posted a link to a pirated game torrent on slashdot. You asked for it.

  40. Re:New Features by mekkab · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just wait 6 months. They'll release the $20 version. I can wait to get that one! (besides, despite getting to the end of GTA3, I've barely gotten ANYWHERE in GTA:VC...)

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  41. PC version release date? by TheFrood · · Score: 1

    Can someone throw a bone to us non-console folks and tell us when the PC version is due out?

    TheFrood

    --
    If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
    1. Re:PC version release date? by NightWulf · · Score: 1

      Probably around the same time Rockstar has released the other two titles. Usually May of the year after. All things staying the same, I would venture a safe guess GTA:SA for PC will be released May 2005. Cheer up! It's only seven months away.

    2. Re:PC version release date? by bryhhh · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's expected sometime around May, June or July 2005.

    3. Re:PC version release date? by TheFrood · · Score: 1

      Arrrgh!

      But thank you for the info, sir.

      TheFrood

      --
      If you say "I'll probably get modded down for this..." then I will mod you down.
  42. Re:New Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, I didnt realise it was gay porn.

  43. Goddamn Job! by glowimperial · · Score: 2, Funny

    My roommate is playing this right now. And I am working what may be a 16 hour day. By the time I get home the controller is gonna be stuck to her hand and I won't get to play until she passes out from exhaustion.

    1. Re:Goddamn Job! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...I won't get to play until she passes out from exhaustion.

      Well that all depends on what you want to play, doesn't it :D

    2. Re:Goddamn Job! by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      "...stuck to her hand..." "...until she passes out from exhaustion..."

      Well, we all know where this is going.

    3. Re:Goddamn Job! by Dracoirs · · Score: 1

      "controller is gonna be stuck to her hand" God damnit, this is so fucking hot. i have no life

    4. Re:Goddamn Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only on slashdot would a man sit down next to a passed-out (female) roommate and play a video game..

    5. Re:Goddamn Job! by glowimperial · · Score: 1

      Maybe I should take the steam out of this issue by mentioning that my female roommate is married to my male roommate.

    6. Re:Goddamn Job! by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
      > Maybe I should take the steam out of this issue by mentioning that my female roommate is married to my male roommate.

      Great. Now the horny slashdotters are thinking "Threesome!!"

      --
      Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
    7. Re:Goddamn Job! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in places where rape is considered illegal and immoral.

  44. +5 Funny! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A pirate is one who robs or plunders at sea without a commission from a recognized sovereign nation. Pirates usually target other ships, but have also attacked targets on shore. These acts are known as piracy."

    - from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/piracy

    Mod parent up: +5 Funny!

  45. Re:Old news by Holi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why shouldn't he report blatant piracy to the copyright owner.

    I believe it's called "civic duty", something that has been long forgotten.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  46. PC and Linux versions? by Muda69 · · Score: 0

    I see that GTA:SA is initially only being release on the PS2 platform. Anyone know the ETA on a PC and/or Linux version?

    1. Re:PC and Linux versions? by vranash · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Judging by VC I'd say 9 months to a year for a Windows release, and a cold day in hell to a linux release ;-p

      Rockstar is not a linux friendly gaming company.. nor open source, I mean they released GTA *1* as freeware, not open source, that kinda says something, no?

      -- vranash

    2. Re:PC and Linux versions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to say it will be released in May for the PC. Both GTA3 and GTA:VC were PS2 releases in October and May relseases on PC.

  47. Re:New Features by oni · · Score: 1

    So you are saying that they couldn't program enough depth in the game (as in missions, story line, etc) itself?

    yeah, but lots of games have "just missions" I guess Rock Star is trying something new. I've never played any of the GTA games, I'm just saying that I'm not going to knock it until I try it.

    Anyway, don't worry. I'm sure there is a cheat code in there that will let you turn it off.

  48. Come someone explain something to me? by tsangc · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    When did Wil Wheaton become cool? Back when TNG ran, everyone I knew thought of him as some loser. Maybe it was the character, but Wil Wheaton was never anyone special.


    Now whenever I see his name on Slashdot, I see everyone praising his hipness. Is it because he posts on Slashdot? Has a blog? Is a role model to countless nerd teenagers? I don't get it. Seriously.

    1. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of us... one of us...

    2. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, we all know that when Wesley Crusher tries to seem cool and pick up chicks, he goes by Wes. Not Wil. It worked on Ashley Judd.

    3. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He is a good writer and what I can understand a good speaker too. His character might been lame for TNG but shouldn't we blame the script writers for that? What your own opinion of him as an actor is something else. But at least he is being hired for good shows (i.e. Teen Titans) for voicing so he must have some talent.

    4. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by Mononoke · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Now whenever I see his name on Slashdot, I see everyone praising his hipness. Is it because he posts on Slashdot? Has a blog? Is a role model to countless nerd teenagers? I don't get it. Seriously.
      Maybe it's because he's had a blog since long before it was fashionable. Maybe it's because he's a linux user like most slashdotters. Maybe it's because, along the way, he got paid to kiss Ashley Judd.

      Wesley may have been a loser to some, but Wil never was.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    5. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And who the fuck are you, buddy? When do you become cool? Make sure to look me up so I'll know when to give a shit what you have to say.

      Back when TNG ran, everyone I knew thought of him as some loser.

      So all your TNG-watching nerd friends thought someone with a starring role in one of the biggest franchise series of all time was a loser. Now there's some irony.

    6. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you're out of touch. It's a disturbing trend among older males. You should quit reading Slashdot now and sell your computer.

    7. Re:Come someone explain something to me? by lxs · · Score: 1

      everyone I knew thought of him as some loser.

      Wil isn't a loser, but he played one on TV.

  49. Re:Good indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and like ebgames.com they would never allow reviews before the game is even released.

  50. hard to get excited by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I played GTA3 on the PC and Vice City on the PS2 and loved them (Vice City in particular) but I'm getting a real "been there done that" vibe from this San Andreas. It sounds like they've just added more stuff to do on top of the same old shit and thrown new skins and voices onto the same old graphics engine.

    There's such a thing as too much realism. I mean, who wants to eat and work out and ride a bicycle in a video game? I play games to feel like I'm doing something that I can't do in the real world, and between GTA3 and Vice City I've already done all the crazy shit that I wanted to do.

    Finally, the early 90s L.A. setting isn't what I'd personally call fun. If GTA3 is comparable to The Sopranos and Vice City is like Miami Vice or Scarface, then San Andreas is like the LA gangsta scene and that wasn't fictional. Lots of young people really died in the places that movies like "Boyz in The Hood" were about. Yeah, eventually that gangsta rap stuff got to be cliche and Snoop Dogg is funny and all that but it all comes from a place where innocent people died. You can't say anything about Tony Montana is real other than there were Cuban cokeheads in Miami in the early 1980s.

    The geek part of me says "ooh, shiny new game" but the rational side says "don't believe the hype."

    1. Re:hard to get excited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe its the politically correct side of you. But me as a spending most of my life in what you might call "inner city" we still call it the hood. Most of the music videos and movies we watch are just extensions of what we see on a daily basis. AND NOW WE HAVE A GAME TOO! I have seen alot if not all of "the great hood movies". And this game dosen't offend me as much as some of them might have. I think the scenario just makes it better for those like me and alot of my fellow black students here at college who have been playing this game with me since i got 6:00 pm yesterday. As far as the profanity I would say its pretty realistic. And the npc profanity thats just the old rock star flare. Also on you saying its the same old game it really isnt it just took a few missions to realise that. I dont know maybe I can relate to some of the carachters netter than you.(I swear ryder was made afetr a friend of mine)

      and as for anonymous coward posting I think this is the first reply i ever made to this site so it wasn't worth registering i usually just come to read.

    2. Re:hard to get excited by okayplayer · · Score: 1

      For a first reply... Well done... And as for your writing about the game... I think you nailed exactly what we were trying to do. We're glad someone gets it.

      --
      What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
    3. Re:hard to get excited by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      "There's such a thing as too much realism. I mean, who wants to eat and work out and ride a bicycle in a video game?"

      I guess that explains why The Sims series is doing so poorly, eh?

    4. Re:hard to get excited by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I can totally respect that. I hadn't thought of it from that angle.

    5. Re:hard to get excited by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I'd like for someone to explain the appeal of The Sims to me. It seems like it's just playing 'house' like a little kid, but onscreen.

    6. Re:hard to get excited by bleckywelcky · · Score: 1

      I have no clue. I never claimed that The Sims series appealed to me, I was just stating the facts :) I played the original Sims when it came out and found it a bit intriguing, but extremely monotonous; and, after a while, excruciatingly painful to continue. Therefore, I dropped it then and never looked back.

    7. Re:hard to get excited by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      GTA3 is comparable to The Sopranos and Vice City is like Miami Vice or Scarface, then San Andreas is like the LA gangsta scene and that wasn't fictional.

      Woah, and you think that the Sopranos was based on some totally fictional Itallian crime family? The Mafia was very real. The only reason you probably identify with south central, is I am guessing that you grew up sometime around the 90s. During the 1960 and 1970s, the FBI mounted a massive effort to break up organized crime in the US. During the 1980s, Regan's 'Drug War' tried to stem the flow of drugs from central and south america. You don't think that these were nice people, do you? I'd be willing to bet that the the Mafia and the south American drug cartells have killed a LOT more people than the LA gangs.

      --

      HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    8. Re:hard to get excited by netsavior · · Score: 1

      the "has played it" part of me says, thank god it filled in the gaps Vice City left, such as swimming instead of instant death when you touch water, Police motorcycles, etc. Also, I hopped on the highway drove like 100s of miles into the boonies and never hit an invisible wall, this has to be 100 times the size as vice city's world.

      There are plenty of games where the WHOLE GAME is riding a bicycle, so I don't quite understand that comment...

      Do you think coke barrons like the fictionalized "scarface" didn't kill innocent people?

      Maybe it is because the nineties were so close to you, or maybe because you went through the D.A.R.E. program and have "Gangs are bad m'kay" engrained into your head.

    9. Re:hard to get excited by Mant · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense. The Mafia and the drug/gang scene in Miami were just as real as 90s LA. Lots of people died in all three. All three are equally 'real', all three have games have a fictional protagonist , and fictional location and time modeled on a real one.

    10. Re:hard to get excited by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I didn't go through DARE, and I graduated from high school in 1993. I know that the mafia and coke barons are real and I know that they're not good people. Look at that mob graveyard they're digging up in NYC right now, John Gotti had a guy killed because he accidentally hit his son, for joe's sake.

      The difference between GTA3/GTA:VC and GTA:SA is that the first two are based on the romanticized versions of their subject matter. GTA3 is clearly based on the Hollywood/Puzo mafia mythology. Any one of the characters in Vice City would have been at home on your average episode of Miami Vice, which, was as cheesy as it gets even in its day. SA seems to be based on the way things actually were with the LA gangs.

      Or maybe you guys are right and it's just because the gang thing was closer to me in the 90's than the other stuff was. In 1990 I was 14 so it's not like I spent a lot of time knowing what was really going on in the 80's.

    11. Re:hard to get excited by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      I loved the original idea where it was more like a society simulation rather than controlling one person. If it had been more like that I would have probably played it myself. When I heard that you had to do things like tell your guy who to date I was turned off immediately..

  51. Re:New Features by Tenareth · · Score: 1

    Before one of my kids stepped on my Vice City CD, I actually had finished all but one event (The top level race), and had 3 tanks in different garages. It was a blast to be able to just run in, grab a tank and kill everything in your path.

    Once you get the first tank, it's painfully easy to get more :)

    --
    This sig is the express property of someone.
  52. Reaching out to Rockstar by DrXym · · Score: 4, Interesting
    When you get around to porting this to the PC, please, please with a cherry on top sort out the frigging pedestrian / car behaviour.


    In the previous two games you could stand still, do a 360 turn and pedestrians / cars who were visible a moment ago have been replaced with other pedestrians / cars. Such behaviour might be unavoidable in the PS2 version, but it's seriously annoying in the PC version.


    There were some very dumb pathing issues too. A common thing in previous games was to stand under a bridge and watch as police etc., jumped straight off it to their deaths to get you. Or they would drive straight into the water etc.


    It's amusing but it screws up some missions too. One mission had you rescuing your buddy from a scrap yard. I did that part and he followed me out. I ran across a bridge and turned around to see him fall straight into the water and drown. The pathing had him make a beeline straight for my character without checking whether he would drown in the process.


    Still, GTA games are excellent, but that AI needs work.

    1. Re:Reaching out to Rockstar by MustardMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I never noticed any of these issues in the xbox version. I know there was a bug in the ps2 version, where if you completed certain quests to get items to appear at your savepoints, those items wouldn't appear at savepoints you bought after completing the quest. This bug was fixed on the xbox version also. Perhaps it's worth waiting the extra year for the xbox version to be released.

      Note to people who are about to attack me for using an xbox: i software modded it to run linux and play mp3s illegally downloaded off the internet, so im not an MS fanboy. Get off my nuts.

    2. Re:Reaching out to Rockstar by secolactico · · Score: 1

      In the previous two games you could stand still, do a 360 turn and pedestrians / cars who were visible a moment ago have been replaced with other pedestrians / cars. Such behaviour might be unavoidable in the PS2 version, but it's seriously annoying in the PC version.

      Odd, I don't remember this behaviour on the Xbox version. In fact, I remember pressing the "look back" button (right thumbstick) and seeing what I expected to see behind me. I might have to check, tho, my memory has been known to fail before.

      --
      No sig
    3. Re:Reaching out to Rockstar by Xshare · · Score: 1

      AFAIK, that was fixed in this game... so your entire post is moot.

    4. Re:Reaching out to Rockstar by teklob · · Score: 1

      I had lots of fun on that rescue mission.
      I escaped from the junkyard with lance and got all the way to the hospital with him.
      I parked in the pink marker but didnt quite hit the right spot, so I figured you need to walk into it so i got out of the car, and lance did likewise, at which point the cars that i had escaped caught up with us, pulled alongside me and ran over lance.

    5. Re:Reaching out to Rockstar by pilkul · · Score: 1
      There were some very dumb pathing issues too. A common thing in previous games was to stand under a bridge and watch as police etc., jumped straight off it to their deaths to get you. Or they would drive straight into the water etc.

      Uh, dude, that's not a bug, that's a feature :).

  53. weeeeeee by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    I purchased the game last evening and played till wee hours of the morning. I love the game even though the graphics department fell short. I love that you can swim. I hate that i have to feed my character now and then lest he should lose his stamina.

    I love the country-side and the fact you can outrace a car on your little BMX bicycle. I love the farm tractors and getting on the freeway (highway) with a lawnmower - that's what i just did for a good two hours - get on vehicles and drive around. There was this one place where my buddy was playing and CJ was on a hilly area and he rode the motobike straight into a advertising board and came out the other way with a "big hole" in the board - that was AWESOME!!!!

    This game is pretty sweet :). Get yours today

  54. The game is way beyond my expectations. by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

    The game is great. I find it amazing that all the naysayers on this board, as usual, haven't tried it and are complaining about it without having done so. Typical and pitiful.

    1. Re:The game is way beyond my expectations. by Mant · · Score: 1

      If you think it is usual that the naysayers don't try something, why do you find it amazing? Do things you expect usually amaze you? You must find life... amazing.

    2. Re:The game is way beyond my expectations. by Warlock7 · · Score: 1

      Good point. I don't so much find life amazing, as I do the continued depth of the ignorance of people. I usually expect more and then I am amazed that people fall far short of my expectations. I suppose that I should just take it for granted that many of those here are generally just idiots that like to speak about things that they have no personal experience with.

      It is an interesting behavior that comes from this wonderful global community experiment. Those that feel that they have something to say and perceive that what they say is of value, regardless of their inexperience and lack of knowledge on any given number of various subjects.

      The thing that I find most disturbing about it is that this type of behavior in day to day life is becoming more and more rampant. I just don't know if it is intensifying due to the internet and communities like this one, or if it was always there and it is a natural progression towards a society of know-it-alls.

      It would seem that we're just sliding down the sharp edge of the razor blade together, either way.

  55. What was removed from the leaked copy? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I heard the retail version of this game is a dual-layer DVD.

    However, the one that was "leaked" last week fits nicely on a plain ol' DVD-R. Odd thing, I've put a ton of hours into it and nothing seems missing. Textures are fine, music sounds great, and all the movies/cutscenes are there.

    Does anyone happen to know exactly what the differences are?

    (oh wait, I admitted to downloading a game, does that mean the moral crusaders are coming after me to mod me down?!)

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:What was removed from the leaked copy? by fr0dicus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not dual layer. It was mentioned in the runup but didn't happen.

  56. Re:Good indeed by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just read one from "Evil Jesus" which makes me want to buy it:

    "I was a young neoconservative Christian and general admirer of George bush.....until I played this game!"

    COUNT ME IN!

  57. GTA:SA by pawnIII · · Score: 1

    Got the game at 10am this morning, was about 25 other people there standing with me waiting to get there hands on it. All I got to say, its pretty sweet, don't know about the eating thing. Haven't played that much of it so far, but its pretty good, though for some reason I don't feel like jacking everybody. At least the Soundtrack is on point. Listening to Ice Cube, NWA, & Dr. Dre while cruizing the streets, is pure greatness.

    1. Re:GTA:SA by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1

      though for some reason I don't feel like jacking everybody.

      I noticed that as well. I attribute it to the fact that you start the game in your own neighborhood. I kinda would feel bad about stealing cars from my next door neighbors.

    2. Re:GTA:SA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So from what I'm reading, this game represents almost everything shitty about the 90's:

      1) Little wanna-be 'gangstas' who all deserve a shotgun up the ass.

      2) cRap 'music' that tries to promote more of #1.

      3) Some of the most ridiculous clothing I've seen yet, and I lived during the 70's!

      The only thing it's missing on my 90's hate list is the whiney-as-fuck, pretentious, poor-me "grunge music scene".

    3. Re:GTA:SA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the wanna be gangstas. Hell, I still see them. As far as rap, it's noise and nothing more, yo. As for as grunge, it was a bit whiney yet it had a message for Generation X. So keep quiet old man and steal my future with your Social Security checks.

  58. Law Enforcement by TykeClone · · Score: 1

    If you run a red light next to a cop, will he start chasing you?

    --
    A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    1. Re:Law Enforcement by Ill_Omen · · Score: 1

      as in the previous games, it looks like the entire police department is made up of the homicide division... no traffic rules enforcement at all.

    2. Re:Law Enforcement by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      With all the homicides in Vice City and Liberty City, can you blame them?

    3. Re:Law Enforcement by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      If they pulled over one or two of the cars running stoplights, maybe they'd solve some of those homicides :)

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    4. Re:Law Enforcement by jmke · · Score: 1

      Mafia had this feature, running lights, or passing the speed limit would "enable" the cops to come chase you. not always fun. :)

    5. Re:Law Enforcement by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      I've been playing Vice City lately, trying to bide my time until I can get a new PS2 and San Andreas, and one thing I noticed is that in VC, there are actually other criminals! And you're right, the carjackers are the guys running lights and doing the reckless driving that knocks me off my PCJ.

      You make a really good point.

    6. Re:Law Enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although if you should brush into one of their cars by accident... you're fucked.

  59. Hey! Don't worry! by Chordonblue · · Score: 1

    " Too bad it'll be several months till I'll be able to play it.. damn PS2 only releases!"

    I'm certain you'll be able to play it on the PC in all it's low res texture 'glory' sometime next year.

    I don't mind it if these guys to console-only releases, but it REALLY pisses me off when my nice, 10-times-faster-than-the-PS/2 computer's capability is wasted.

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
    1. Re:Hey! Don't worry! by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 2, Funny

      if your computer is only 10x as fast as a PS/2, I doubt you'll be able to run it anyway.

    2. Re:Hey! Don't worry! by endx7 · · Score: 1

      I tried Vice City for PC, and I didn't like it. It may be because I've always been playing it on the PS2, but it just feels more natural there.

      On the other hand, I feel just the opposite about Halo. When playing first person shooters a mouse just feels more natural to me. I'm pretty bad at aiming with just my thumb (tying back to GTA...this is probably why I don't like shooting as much in Vice City...fortunately Vice City was more into the whole driving thing)

    3. Re:Hey! Don't worry! by G-funk · · Score: 1

      The PC release of GTA3 had much gigher resolution textures than the PS2 version. It was much touted when the game was released.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  60. Love to see GTA: WorldWide by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'd love to see GTA as an MMO - a game where the whole point is to be as much of an asshole as possible. Kind of like usenet, but you get to run people over.

    It would be a fun change from the FPS's and deathmatches, at the least.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    1. Re:Love to see GTA: WorldWide by DanthemaninVA1 · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be fun. It would be thousands of people trying to be the biggest jackasses they could; you'd never get anywhere without being run off the road or shot. It'd be dying every 30 seconds and waiting 5 for to respawn. That sounds the opposite of awesome.

    2. Re:Love to see GTA: WorldWide by thesandtiger · · Score: 1
      Wait - are you talking about usenet or the game?

      More seriously, what's fun for some is not fun for all. Me, I'd rather a GTA-style kill-fest than Yet Another Goddamn Fantasy MMOG.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  61. Innovative! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Just what I want, all the drudgery of real life!

    Oh well, at least I can still beat up and rob hookers, right?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:Innovative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better yet: beat up, rob, kill, cook, and eat the hookers. Covers excercise, money, and food all in one clean series of button presses.

    2. Re:Innovative! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Just what I want, all the drudgery of real life!

      Oh well, at least I can still beat up and rob hookers, right?

      Like you said, drudgery of real life...

  62. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blow me. I hope you get a$$ raped when you spend some time in jail for pirating.. scumbag.

  63. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Stoopid beeeeotch!

    I hope you downloaded it first!

  64. Got it last night in 5 minutes, too... by Joseph+Vigneau · · Score: 1

    My experience was pretty much the same. I was going to Target to get an umbrella, and I noticed there is a game store next to it.. I walked in, asked if GTA:SA was out or not (I knew it was due out this week some time). There were only about 5 people in the whole store. I asked if they carried GTA, and they asked if I preordered. I said no, and was just about to walk out (I'm not desperate, I could have held out a few weeks), when they pulled a copy off the shelf for me. The clerk then proceeded to try to sell me the Strategy Guide (20% off!), scratch insurance ($3), and if I put in a $5 deposit for Halo 2, I could win an X-box. Needless to say, I went home with just my game and an umbrella.

    Oh, and the BMX bike rocks.

    1. Re:Got it last night in 5 minutes, too... by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 1

      Scratch insurance? Oh great. They're trying to do anything these days to increase their profit margin.

      Let's see. You can't do anything you want with the software because it's just licensed to you, so the companies can dictate what you do with it.

      Bud suddenly when you break it, the company won't let you replace the CD without buying another copy despite the fact you still own a license! Then they try to keep you from copying it? I would like to have a backup I play off so I can go back to the original if it get scratched!

      Scratch insurance. Ridiculous!

    2. Re:Got it last night in 5 minutes, too... by kisrael · · Score: 1

      At my EB, the guy said they were really pushing the preorders, so ANY game for the modern 3 consoles would be worth $10 credit. Given their usual policies, that's a pretty good deal. I brought 5 crapola games, some I got for less than $10, and got Halo 2 "for free".

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  65. Not an idiot. by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    How many other 'stars' do you see that have an IQ above 79? Most people in Hollywood come off to me as shallow, self absorbed idiots. Do you really think that Paris Hilton could keep up with even 10% of the conversations on /.?

    I think that Wil is respected here, because he is an intelligent person who is famous, and hasn't let it go to his head. He is a 'home town nerd, that made good'.

    Of course, Hitler himself could post to /., and if he admitted to using *NIX, he would probably get modded up....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Not an idiot. by tsangc · · Score: 1

      I think that Wil is respected here, because he is an intelligent person who is famous, and hasn't let it go to his head. He is a 'home town nerd, that made good'.

      Of course, Hitler himself could post to /., and if he admitted to using *NIX, he would probably get modded up....


      Well, that's the part I don't get.


      I never claimed the guy was an idiot, just someone who I personally never considered to be particularly worthy of praise.


      Now, admittedly, I'm just a member of the average television viewing public with a worthless opinion, but I wouldn't really think of Wil Wheaton as being that famous or interesting. Nor would I consider him a particularly good writer. There are more interesting people, whether they be better actors, are more famous/infamous, or have intelligent things to say.


      Is it the combination of the all of the above? He's seems like a "normal" guy, who also happened to be on a big scifi show? These attributes appeal to the Slashdot audience because they fit really well with the demographic here?


      As for being ignorant, well, if ignorance of Wil Wheaton fandom is such a bad thing, then I guess I'll have to stay unenlightened. I suppose I just don't see the big deal of having a celebrity that has something to say. It's like the hoopla with Natalie Maines and her anti-George Bush commentary: There are people with better, more insightful things to say about that topic, so why should I care what she says?

    2. Re:Not an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you saying that CleverNickName has an IQ of 80? If so, he'd be the third-smartest actor on the set.

    3. Re:Not an idiot. by Master+Ben · · Score: 1

      How many other 'stars' do you see that have an IQ above 79? Most people in Hollywood come off to me as shallow, self absorbed idiots. Do you really think that Paris Hilton could keep up with even 10% of the conversations on /.?

      Completely agree with the Paris Hilton reference. I only know of one person in hollywood(kind of) that could hold her own with 90% of the shit on /. That would be Asia Carrere. Some of you may know her from such films as .... (I don't think I need to post the films). Anyway she's smart as hell, a major gamer, and she does some app. programming for fun. Now that's someone that /. needs to invite to the boards.

  66. Re:New Features by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Funny

    See this game is actually promoting good health. Almost balances out all the wanton death and destruction...

    --
    500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
  67. Re:New Features by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Insightful

    VC is somewhat more of the same. It's an update built on the same game engine. But aside from the new city and new missions, the big new thing in VC was all the new drivable/flyable vehicles, the helicopter, seaplane, motorcycles. It's no simulation, but all the vehicles have unique handling, and the basic controls on the plane and helicopter are correct.

  68. Ignorance + Intranets = Fun*2 by contagious_d · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They had Gran Turismo 4 linked from that page too, according to Mothers Against Video Game Violence, "they dont go too fast in this game like...the ranchy Street Racing Syndicate." Mmmm, ranchy! She (they, he?) goes on to say that "Online play was what worried me though because playing with total strangers is bad but no there is none so which is good so buy it today!". I know, its kinda OT, but this needed to be pointed out.

    --
    - /home is where the food is.
  69. Re:New Features by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

    Hey. MGS3 had this feature in planning since the first demo was released back in '03's E3

    --
    Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  70. Re:New Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So they're excited to be emulating The Sims?

  71. everyone you knew? by phriedom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So everyone you knew thought of Wheaton as a loser? Has anyone you know ever met Wil Wheaton? Read his books? Have you ever read his weblog?

    I can tell you why I like Wil, but if you really want to know why people like Wil, you should just go read his writing.

    Now seriously, why is "I don't get it." modded up? Since when was ignorance insightfull?

    --
    Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
    1. Re:everyone you knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now seriously, why is "I don't get it." modded up? Since when was ignorance insightfull?

      Amen to that.

    2. Re:everyone you knew? by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Since when was ignorance insightfull?

      Ahmm...you're new here, right?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    3. Re:everyone you knew? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Shutup Wesley-lover!" -- Racist Picard

  72. Although by igzat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm probably going to be right out there with the rest of you picking this up, am I the only one that's a bit concerned about seeing all the parents buying the game for their kids? Supposedly the ESRB stuff is supposed to stop retailers from selling the game to people under 18, but I know that many parents don't have the time or the willpower to look into what media their children consume. And I know this series gets pretty bad, with things like picking up prostitutes, car theft, and massacre being rewarded in what some have termed a "pornography of violence".

    1. Re:Although by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your comment looks strangely familiar.

  73. Re:New Features by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Funny

    heheh. I'll give you 10 xp for that, and a quest point.

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  74. Re:New Features by Khasmo · · Score: 1

    Couldn't I just play Sims if I wanted this kind of drudgery.

  75. Re:New Features by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I heard there will be an expansion pack were you not only have to feed your GTA character, you also have to purchase various household items with various stats such as "Hygiene", "Environment", etc. and your GTA character will have several meters showing what his mood is related to each of these values. If your GTA character's mood falls too far, he will simply refuse to pop a cap in someone and instead make a puddle on the floor and/or set himself on fire.

    --
    "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  76. Empowering by prell · · Score: 4, Interesting

    GTA:SA does not fall into the thoughtless exploitation of "the hood," which many people may have expected from a series that sports almost comical violence and detachment from reality. This lack of exploitation is in stark relief when played against the lyrics sung by Snoop about killing cops. Rather than experiencing a bunch of empty-headed black charicatures in a consequence-free environment spurting "ebonix," drinking 40s and shooting each other, there's a definite desperation in this game that you sympathize with immediately, to the point that you almost feel you know how Laurence Fishburne's character felt when he proclaimed that rich white men are infecting the hood with drugs in order to destroy its inhabitants. And the characters are complex, wallowing in the self-destruction that they're so desperate to destroy. And it's obvious the effects that their environment has on them. While GTA had you initially sickened with, and eventually lavishing violence, this game bound my emotions to every kill, every chase, and just about every action. When my mission was to kill a crack dealer in broad daylight, I really felt it; I really wanted him dead.

    1. Re:Empowering by paganizer · · Score: 1, Funny

      I guess I'll just have to wait for the "not a wigger" mod before I play it.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:Empowering by black+mariah · · Score: 0

      Ummm.... you are aware the main character is black, right?

      --
      'Standards' in computing only impress those who are impressed by things like 'standards'.
    3. Re:Empowering by loopback_127001 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In a similar vein, I've barely begun the game (done perhaps 7 or 8 missions thus far), and I've amassed a total of ... almost $1k.

      Compare that to Vice City, where you were making 1k-5k PER MISSION right from go. Going to the clothing store and buying a new outfit is a hard choice. You go in and the shit costs what feels like 'real' money.

      I'm sure as the game continues, money becomes less of an issue. But I'm very pleased that they did successfully map the relative poverty level of "the hood" so that the player didn't have thousands of dollars to begin with.

      I do have one problem with the game however, and it's a problem that I'm surprised slipped through QA & product evaluation.

      In a very early mission, you take a baseball bat, and you have to fight multiple enemies. The manual does _not_ tell you how to switch targets when in 'lock on' mode. In a mission that happens several missions _after_ that one, you are walked through shooting a gun, locking on targets, and cycling through all available targets.

      -1 : failing to document the target cycle controls in the manual

      -1 : ordering the 'tutorial' missions such that the useful knowledge comes after the mission when you would first need it.

      Still, total score: 98/100.

    4. Re:Empowering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to the point that you almost feel you know how Laurence Fishburne's character felt when he proclaimed that rich white men are infecting the hood with drugs in order to destroy its inhabitants.

      Not that I'm into conspiracy theories, but wouldn't it be "rich hispanic men"?
    5. Re:Empowering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe refering to all the "wiggers" who are going to rush out and get it?

  77. Re:Old news by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

    Well, you can tell Rockstar, but you're going to have a hard time proving he actually got anything from it unless you got a hold of his computer.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  78. Confused... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm a little fuzzy on this. If I commit copyright infringment on the high seas, with a comission from a sovern nation, am I cool or what?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Confused... by Snowmit · · Score: 1

      I think that it means that you're HavenCo.

      --
      I have a lot of opinions about Cyborgs and Architects
    2. Re:Confused... by vettemph · · Score: 4, Funny

      am I cool or what
      No, you're not cool, just legit. :)
      What he was trying to say is "If you're employed by George W. Bush, you can relieve entire countries of their arms and oil without repercussion.

      --
      The government which is strong enough to protect you from everything is strong enough to take everything from you.
    3. Re:Confused... by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'm a little fuzzy on this. If I commit copyright infringment on the high seas, with a comission from a sovern nation, am I cool or what?

      No.

      You're not cool.

      At all.

      Nor are you likely to ever be.

      Sorry man, I didn't mean it, but you made it too easy.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    4. Re:Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What he was trying to say is "If you're employed by George W. Bush, you can relieve entire countries of their arms and oil without repercussion.

      Ah, well good to see that Iraq doesn't have any oil or weapons left. Nope, all gone.
  79. Some interesting game behavior... by Thedalek · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've been playing around with it for a few hours. You can swim now, which makes for an intersting addition. If you try to leave the SA (Yeah, we all know it's really Los Angeles: Check out the Vinewood sign) area, you encounter road construction. So I decided to try to swim under the closed-off bridges. Bad Idea. When you arrive on the opposite shore, you are instantly a super-wanted criminal, four stars.

    Another intersting change is the geography-relevant vehicles. You're not likely to encounter a fancy import car in CJ's home neighborhood, nor will you find any two-tone beaters in the glitzy parts of town. If you drive out into the countryside, you'll encounter 10mph tractors, and on the highways, you might even see some 18-wheelers (although I have yet to see any carrying a trailor: If they are present, it might be another optional mission type, like the vigilante, rescue, and fire missions in other GTAs).

    Also, car surfing is alive and well. You can ride on someone's hood clear around town, and this is a good way to quickly explore the city. It is a bit confusing, however, to see the particular pathways some drivers take. Also, it's interesting to note that since the clock goes at 1 game-minute per real second, several traffic lights take 15-20 minutes. Man, that's awful.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by SlashdotOgre · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, it's interesting to note that since the clock goes at 1 game-minute per real second, several traffic lights take 15-20 minutes. Man, that's awful. Yep, it's definitely LA.

      --
      Sadly, PS/2 was yet another victim of USB, which doesn't care what you plug into it, the electrical slut.
    2. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      4 stars is all? Easy...

      I am proud to have stolen and garaged a tank from a full-stars military attack in VC. I used it to beat the game... last mission, I fought my way outside and fired the main cannon directly into vercetti manor :)

      Yes, it takes a long damned time to steal a tank.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once you get the gattling gun etc, getting up to maximum stars is pretty easy. (At least on PC, where aiming is trivial.)

    4. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      I've never played VC on PC... even on PS2 (where aiming is harder) max stars is easy. Somehow getting in there and stealing a tank w/o getting killed is a bitch.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    5. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by wheany · · Score: 1

      Getting multiple tanks in VC is really easy. There is this one mission where you have to steal a tank. Before you go on it, buy the big apartment building with big garages in the north-west part of Vice City.

      Steal the tank as you would in the mission, drive it to the garage and let it explode. When you open the garage doors, it will be good as new. Repeat until you have enough tanks/the garages are full.

    6. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I just shot at the tank door, and the guy jumped out. No problem.

    7. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by el-spectre · · Score: 1

      Sure, but I stole mine w/max stars, not on a mission. And no magic garage tricks :)

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    8. Re:Some interesting game behavior... by nuggetboy · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly, you can also quickly dispose of the tank drivers (however many stars you may have) with a carefully-placed sniper shot.

      First, hole up somewhere where you have fire cover, then choose whichever tank you think you can back out easily without the cops yanking you out of the door. Kill the driver with the sniper (the passenger leaves automatically, I think), choose your moment and run for the tank.

  80. McTubby by xilmaril · · Score: 1

    I heard about the eating feature a few months ago, and if what I've heard is true, it's not just some Ultima-style message saying you're hungry every few minutes. Your character actually changes based on what you eat. If you eat hamburgers all the time, you'll turn fat and slow, for example. Sounds like good stuff.

  81. Run? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Pardon me, but if you aren't headed there in a jacked cadilac with spinners then you really should have one.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  82. Slashdot = intelligent... no really... by ajservo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading some of the posts on here regarding the game's launch, it's readily evident that the people who post here, have at least mastered not using 4aX0R 5p33k in a post. If you don't believe me, go look at the forum for this game on Gamefaqs... You'd never guess that mods sit on that thing.

    There's a variety of posts, including users who don't believe that people get review copies of games, others that believe the game destroys PS2's, and polls asking how late someone will stay up tonight playing it. Really engaging conversations.

    All I was wanting last night was some help on the game, and all I got was a lousy flame.

    1. Re:Slashdot = intelligent... no really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled h4x0r.

    2. Re:Slashdot = intelligent... no really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want to see how bad people can get on GameFAQs, then just check out this site I've happened to come across:

      http://gbsm.freewebpage.org

  83. The Dark Horse by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Don't forget Rachet & Clank: Up You Arsenal is out pretty soon as well!

    For me that looks about like the ultimate multiplayer expereince. I think it's a dark horse that will do pretty well.

    I know what you mean about the sudden flood of good games. The Bards Tale also looks to be another worth having.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  84. Re:Hmm... (Drifting OT) by arcmay · · Score: 1

    American Pie did have an R rating. And I didn't think it had a "completely irresponsible attitude towards teenage sex". The whole pretext of the movie (four guys tryig to get laid and dealing with their insecurities about it) is a fairly accurate portrayal of real high school.

  85. Re:Old news by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    There's always conspiracy to commit piracy, I guess? :->

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  86. Mitnick and Goldstein by okayplayer · · Score: 1

    Mentioned it above, and was sad to see that nobody had notice or mentioned it... Good looks to Lazlo for bringing in the good talent.

    --
    What a horrible thing the ESRB just did to the game industry.
  87. They may be hardcore, doing GTA voices and all... by Lethyos · · Score: 1

    ...but I've never seen them drive the cork-screw of a Swiss Army Knife through their nose piercing.

    --
    Why bother.
  88. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How ironic, somebody taking the moral high-ground on protecting a game that encourages all kinds of heinious crimes from somebody making a copy of it.

  89. Radio Nitpicking by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

    ...tune in to WCTR News...

    Uh, yeah, great job on the game, but since it's set on the West Coast, tuning in to WCTR News is going to be goddamned difficult. Probably should be KCTR.

    Of course, WCTR (Chestertown, MD) and KCTR (Billings, MT) both exist, so...

    --
    "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    1. Re:Radio Nitpicking by RotJ · · Score: 1

      Parent's point is that radio stations west of the Mississippi River have call signs beginning with K and stations east of the river start with W. Since this is not exactly common knowledge for most Americans, and since the British made this game, and since the game doesn't revolve around the life of a radio personality, I suppose it's forgivable. For example, if Frasier Crane worked for WACL in Seattle instead of KACL, then that would be a big gaffe. Also, as long as we're nitpicking, Asuka's name in GTA3 was pronounced wrong, because it should be "AH-skah" with the "u" nearly silent and not "a-SOO-kah".

      But maybe the game is right all along. Because in GTA's parallel Earth, there are major cities in the US called Liberty City, Vice City, and Los Santos, and only black people can swim. So maybe the radio stations are named differently and the Japanese pronounce all their words the way the you think the Romanized spelling of those words would sound. And there's an island in the Atlantic called Rand McNally where they wear hats on their feet and hamburgers eat people.

  90. Shellshocked... by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    I'm eluding to Eidos' new game ShellShock: Nam '67 for the pc and consoles. It depicts cutscenes with brutal violence and dismemberment, like when "a member of your squad ties a prostitute to an upright mattress, beats her mercilessly with his fists, and then takes a giant Rambo knife to her breasts before finally slitting her throat" (quote lifted from Gamespot review). No doubt there will be children out there inflicted by the horror of this game, either by directly watching it or by watching an adult play it.

    Reportedly, there's also interactive prostitution, as well as the bad language, torture and ultra-violent gameplay. GTA: San Andreas may not be the bad kid on the block anymore.

    1. Re:Shellshocked... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • Reportedly, there's also interactive prostitution, as well as the bad language, torture and ultra-violent gameplay. GTA: San Andreas may not be the bad kid on the block anymore.
      Well I never thought of GTA as the real bad boy of video games, at least not up till now (I haven't seen all of the game and played none of it so far, just saw a friend play some of it). Sure it had lots of violence and revolved around criminal activities but it didn't take itself very seriously. It was very much tounge-in-cheek all the way through. I just loved the name of the designer drug in GTA3, 'spank'. Most definitely they weren't trying to be very serious and were enjoying themselves.

      From what I saw San Andreas continues at least some of this. I loved when they jumped off a cliff into the water and CJ yelled out "I hate gravity!" as he fell. It was also amusing to see you could attack people with the spray paint by spraying it in their faces. I'm guessing there's more stuff like that in there, at least I hope there is, I enjoyed the funny stuff a lot!

      As to the stuff from "Shellshock" you mentioned. Damn, that's bad. I'm not generally interested in games like that (FPS games in general make me sick from vertigo) but I'm glad to learn about it so I can make sure not to ever play it. I certainly wouldn't want to see that scene ever, much less in a GAME. I know something that brutal and violent would probably give me nightmares, I can't imagine how it would affect a kid.

      On that note, it's kinda sad that a game so horribly brutal (and yes I do realize that it's realistic) only gets an M, but a game just showing nudity (The Guy Game) gets an AO (Adult Only). Personally I'd think that the violence would be far worse for a kid to see than some breasts, but apparently I'm wrong.

    2. Re:Shellshocked... by Brian_Confucius · · Score: 1

      ...but apparently I'm wrong.

      I realize you're probably being facetious, but please don't think, even for a second, that just because something refers to itself as an authority, that means you should believe it unquestioningly.

  91. Is it just me or is Everyone a racist by netsavior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ok not really, but I have heard record amounts of people say "I dunno, I am gonna buy it but I dont wanna be a gangsta, I wanna be tommy vercetti" I get the distinct impression that people (fellow geeks) are having a hard time adjusting to having a black main character.

    1. Re:Is it just me or is Everyone a racist by deesine · · Score: 1


      It's just you.

      --
      damaged by dogma
    2. Re:Is it just me or is Everyone a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i know that i don't want to play as a black gangsta. why? because i'm not black! in a game i want the environment around me to be fake, not really what i(the character) look like.

    3. Re:Is it just me or is Everyone a racist by Bulldozer2003 · · Score: 1, Funny

      I also doubt you look like the marine in Doom3 or are an MIT professor like Gordon Freeman

    4. Re:Is it just me or is Everyone a racist by drgath159 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is rediculous. After playing 3 hours of this game, it's definately the best storyline, most in depth character-wise, most realistic emotional-wise GTA thus far. This is coming from a cracka from Kansas who has only drivin past Compton on the highway twice before. Props to Rockstar for once again going against the grain. Sure, a Gangsta (not Gangster) theme has been a couple times before, but for a game that has so much riding on it, they took a chance and it definately paid off. They've done the mob/gangster before, time for something new. Favorite features so far... - Driving really fast and the screen becomes blurry (I'll call it Fast and the Furious effect), - Being able to swim - How insanely big the map is - Rolling hills Game is amazing so far, probably anticipated Vice City more than SA (actually forgot it came out today until I bought it at about 8PM), but having more fun in the first few hours with this than VC.

    5. Re:Is it just me or is Everyone a racist by rnb · · Score: 1

      I haven't played SA yet, but I preferred the silent guy to Tommy Vercetti. I don't know if it was Ray Liotta or the written lines for the character or what, but Vercetti got on my nerves pretty quickly.

  92. Hi!!!!\1111!!11one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my name is mbonig (Matthew Tanner Bonig)

    I believe in free speech except when extending to statements I disagree with or to people I hate (African Americans).

    I also call people who express valid opinions names and then claim I am better than them!

    1. Re:Hi!!!!\1111!!11one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm all for negroes having free speech. They just have to evolve to the Homo sapiens sapiensis level and get the ability to speak.

  93. Re:New Features by PygmySurfer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe they need to add an arcade in the game which the character can play on when the player is bored of the story line. I heard Dance Dance Revolution is good.

    you laugh, but apparently there IS a DDR-like minigame.

  94. Hey kids.... by ebbomega · · Score: 1

    Time for another game of FANTASY VS. REALITY.

    Ready...?

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  95. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there is something disturbing to me about the use of the phrase "Get off my nuts" by someone named "MustardMan".

  96. Re:Australia - no censorship by Corty · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to this page at the Australian Goverment Office of Film & Literature Classification GTA:SA will NOT be censored like GTA3 was and we Australians should get the original version like the rest of the world.

    --
    mv /home/corty/sig.file /dev/null
  97. WHERE ARE YOU WIL? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And TV's Wil Wheaton? Excuse me! I think you mean Slashdot's Wil Wheaton!"

    Captain's log, stardate 3.14159265

    Ensign Crusher has been missing for nearly 6 months, which has been confirmed by the lack of entries in his personal log.

    Tomorrow, I will instruct Commander Data to assemble an away team to look for our wayward ensign. He's probably hanging out with that Traveller nut again.

    Still not Admiral. Riker may be sexier than me.

    End log.
    _________

    Seriously though, he's probably staying away from Slashdot because of all the lame Star Trek references.

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  98. Re:New Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but thats different. Its hunting and killing the animal for survival and sustinence in the jungle. People always loved some cool realism and general awesomeness in MGS anyways, so they gave it to them.

    It looks cool in MGS, and actually probably will be kinda fun, but i'd rather not have it either way.

  99. Re:Good indeed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now he's a sobbing wreck.

    Or were you trying to say that violent games make people vote Democrat? :)

  100. Re:New Features by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

    Before one of my kids stepped on my Vice City CD...

    Did they step on your memory card, too?

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  101. Re:New Features by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

    So you are saying that they couldn't program enough depth in the game

    Maybe they came up with a novel idea to put depth into the story and not just stop there.

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
  102. M for Mature by Hrodvitnir · · Score: 1

    the sub warnings (which I'm sure include violence, adult language, adult situations, etc.)

    They are, in fact:

    Blood and Gore
    Intense Violence
    Strong Language
    Strong Sexual Content
    Use of Drugs

    --
    "There are more important things than stopping terrorism. Upholding the Constitution is one of them." - Ars Forumer.
    1. Re:M for Mature by cluke · · Score: 1

      I guess this must be some sort of ESRB "Royal Flush"?

  103. Re:Good indeed by Zangief · · Score: 1

    Oh my god, you are right! The first review is dated 10 April 2004, and gives the game 4 stars out of 5 (based on what!). Here is one "gem"

    I LOVE GTA'S I LOVED GTA 3 AND VICE CITY BUT I CAN NOT WAIT UNTIL SAN ANDREAS CUZ ITS GOING TO BE THE BEST I ALSO HEARD THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE A STRIP CLUB AND THE GIRLS REALLY STRIP SO THATS GOING TO BE AWSOME BUT ANYWAY GRAND THEFT AUTOS IS THE BEST CRIME GAME EVER TO BE MADE!

    I don't know if these people who created time machines, and use them to review the games from the future, or if they are industry insiders, or if they are just idiots.

  104. Re:Australia - no censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would a country populated by British criminals censor violent content in the first place?

  105. Re:New Features by qopax · · Score: 1

    i dunno why, but that made me laugh so hard... too bad no mod points to justify this treachery

    --
    I pwn this comment. "The Fine Print" says so.
  106. MODS, WAKE UP by DroopyStonx · · Score: 0, Troll

    hahaha how in the fuck is this a troll?

    "what are the differences between the retail and leaked version?"

    It's real fucking question you idiots!

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    1. Re:MODS, WAKE UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, fuck you dude. I'll tell you why it's a troll by answering you with an equally trollish question:

      Why do fuckers like you have to tack on some kind of commentary about slashdot in all of your comments? In the future, maybe you'll see just how common it is to throw this type of ending to a comment: "does that mean the moral crusaders are coming after me to mod me down"

      Yes, so we've modded you down. Now shut the fuck up.

    2. Re:MODS, WAKE UP by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

      Nah, just proving your stupidity.

      So blow me, AC.

      --
      We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
    3. Re:MODS, WAKE UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do fuckers like you have to tack on some kind of commentary about slashdot in all of your comments? In the future, maybe you'll see just how common it is to throw this type of ending to a comment: "does that mean the moral crusaders are coming after me to mod me down"

      like, totally, dude! killer, dude! dude!

      modders like you are shitty and don't deserve their points.

      you're bent out of shape because someone added a commentary (an accurate one at that) about slashdot's mods being asses and wrongfully modding a post down when you did exactly that? hypocrite.

      original post gets my positive mod points.

      so, why don't ya shut the fuck up, DUDE!

    4. Re:MODS, WAKE UP by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      I've meta-moderated it as "Unfair" if it'd make you feel better... These stupid meta-moderators should get what they deserve.

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
  107. Storyline-wise... by MMaestro · · Score: 1

    World of Warcraft is a sequel to Warcraft 3. As for original, from what I've gather from friends playing in the beta and previews, it looks like World of Warcraft will be another MMORPG with tons of polish.

    1. Re:Storyline-wise... by Cosmik · · Score: 1

      What other MMORPG has tons of polish?

    2. Re:Storyline-wise... by servognome · · Score: 1

      City of Heroes

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  108. Re:New Features by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

    I didn't own a PS2 when GTAIII came out and I never played it for the PC. I played VC for the first time well after the PC version was out, but on the PS2 when I was watching my little brother for the summer.

    I fell in love with VC and when my brother took his PS2 away I went out and got the PC version. I beat it like 10 times and then decided to go get GTAIII.

    I played GTAIII through once, but really didn't like it anywhere near VC. I could understand the appeal .. VC had everything that made GTAIII cool .. but VC added a lot more than just vehicles IMO.

    The story line was way better, you could relate to Tommy Vercetti a lot more than the character from GTAIII (what was his name anyway?). The radio stations in VC created a far more immersive atmosphere and having recognizable songs from the era it was based in helped tremendously to add to the game's appeal. It also had a lot of comic relief that made the story line more interesting and there were other features like being able to buy property that I really missed going to GTAIII.

    I just purchased a PS2 almost specifically for San Andreas (there were other less-selfish reaons - my wife and kids wanted one for xmas) and it looks like going from SA to VC is going to be just as hard as going from VC to GTAIII .. even though VC is probably my all time favourite game (until now).

  109. First day sales by ananegg · · Score: 1

    My Friend works at a gamestop and i was talking to him today about GTA, he said they started selling it (at 7 pm last night) they sold at least 100 copys. amazing. oh and Earth and Beyond was 1337.

    --
    Insert Pithy Quote here.
  110. Re:Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Piracy@rockstar.com? Well I suppose that http://rockstar.com/ would like to hear from you, but perhaps http://rockstargames.com/ is what you were looking for.

  111. MOD DOWN, PLAGIARIZED by Fourier · · Score: 1
  112. Guest Voices by Taulin · · Score: 1

    Tim Sweeney did a voice on the news radio in the game. So far the game is good, and it draws me back, which says something. However, the game is too dark. Not just figuratively speaking, but I am looking for a gamma adjustment on my TV. Games that simulate day and night seem to always be night, which I don't understand since naturally we stay in doors at night, and day does not go by as fast as it does in games. Why not slow down time during the day, and make it fast at night?

    1. Re:Guest Voices by nuggetboy · · Score: 1

      Have you played with the "Brightness" in the display options?

  113. Re: Wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Er... That page doesn't actually say anything, apart from distribution details. From what I've read elsewhere, it has indeed been dumbed down for Australian gamers.

  114. Re:Australia - no censorship by urbaer · · Score: 1

    According to this page at the Australian Goverment Office of Film & Literature Classification GTA:SA will NOT be censored like GTA3 was and we Australians should get the original version like the rest of the world.

    Possibly not true. Or rather possibly half true. OFLC gave the version of GTA:SA they recieved from Rockstar an MA rating. BUT the version they recieved may be a cut version. I assume that because Rockstar have been knocked back on the previous GTA3's and Manhunt, they know what will pass and won't pass.

    OFLC states that the original version of Vice City was given an MA rating according to this page. The OFLC can't cut a game (or a movie), they can only ban them or approve them.

    But certainly NZ e-tailers seem to be making a big deal of it, trying to get sales over in Australia.

  115. Have you even played these games? by Brakz0rz · · Score: 1

    Sorry setup, you are talking out your ass. Perhaps excepting the sentence regarding lack of game play and even that was close.

    --
    "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot
    1. Re:Have you even played these games? by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      I have more intelligence in my ass than most people do in their entire pelvic region.

  116. Re:Hmm... - I agree 100% by phreakmonkey · · Score: 1
    I agree, but we have to conceded at some point that the culture in the US just doesn't get it.

    For example- in the 1990's Nine Inch Nails came out with a song called "Closer". This song was released as a radio single.

    The song's first stanza and chorus is:

    You let me violate you
    You let me desecrate you
    You let me penetrate you
    You let me complicate you

    [...]

    I want to fuck you like an animal
    I want to feel you from the inside
    [...]

    Oddly, the radio stations and FCC figured that removing the word fuck from the above lyrics made them less offensive.

    To me it's a completely neglegable change. And I'm a fucking Nince Inch Nails fan!

    So in short- while I totally agree with your points, the world just doesn't get it. We have to blame something, and the words are a lot easier to target than the ideas! Think of the children, man!

    Plus- If the opponents did acknowledge that it was the ideas they had a problem with instead of the words then we could accuse them of Orwellian-like behavior and do away with this issue once and for all under the 1st Ammendment! And that would just be way too tidy.

    -PM

  117. Re:New Features by faaaz · · Score: 1

    And you shall receive. There are arcade games in the 24/7 stores around San Andreas...

    --
    we come in peace / shoot to kill
  118. *cough* by Wolfhart · · Score: 1

    And how, pray tell, did you reach this scenario with the crack addict before the game was launched? Years ago, no one gave a crap if someone bragged about their pirated copies and how uncool it was to pay money to the developers. Since then many of us have gotten jobs and now understand the impact of piracy from a completely different angle. Fortunately, there's sites such as www.ztorm.com that hope to change all that and allow anyone the right to publish their software at whatever profit margins. But the reality is that piracy is a huge problem, and even if it's still as widespread as copying eight-tracks 20 years ago, that doesn't make it cool. It's not cool to be a pirate. It's about as sexy as getting caught masturbating; and from there you can decide for yourself which defensive statement would work. I doubt 'but everyone else is doing it' makes you any less embarassed. Or perhaps I'm the only one who's changed my mind regarding piracy.

    1. Re:*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh... The game was released yesterday. That mission is very early in the game. Calm down already.

      Or perhaps I'm the only one who's changed my mind regarding piracy.

      Or perhaps your're the only one who likes to act holier-than-thou whenever you get the chance. Even when you're wrong.

    2. Re:*cough* by potus98 · · Score: 1

      Ummmm, assuming you replied to the right parent, the post Empowering by prell was dated Tuesday October 26, @05:37PM. Even the original thread wasn't posted by Zonk until Tuesday October 26, @04:22PM. Both are well after the official R* U.S. launch time.

      The game was officially, publicly launched in the U.S. on 10/26. R* had approved arrangements with certain retailers (like EB) to begin selling the game on 10/25 at 7:00pm. Progressing to the crack addict mission occurs VERY early in the game.

      --
      This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  119. Re:New Features by potus98 · · Score: 1

    Finally? Have you never played Pac-Man?

    --
    This one gang kept wanting me to join cause I'm pretty good with a bo staff.
  120. Constant language abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a huge fan of GTA 3 and VC, but the first few hours I played SA, I was annoyed. Fuck this and shit that and Nigger Nigger Nigger all the time. There is very little that can offend me, and this doesn't. But it is annoying. I suppose those kids that do talk like that daily will find this entertaining. Personally, I miss they style of GTA 3 and VC with Tommy V. It is like someone else took over the project that didn't care about the game at all. They just looked at the "big points" and amplified them a 100 fold.

  121. This may or may not be it, but... by solipsiae · · Score: 1

    There's a mini-game where you get a guy to trick out the car of your choice and he hooks it up with wicked hydraulics. You "hop" the car using the right analog stick when directional arrows match up to a point on the screen, and they hit to beats to a song. It's like that donkey konga game, no lie.

  122. Re:Old news by d_jedi · · Score: 1

    I realized that after I made the post. Rest assured, the message got to Rockstar Games :->

    --
    I am the maverick of Slashdot
  123. Re:Australia - no censorship by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
    Why would a country populated by British criminals censor violent content in the first place?

    I know, it sounds stupid. Especially when the smart folk out there know that that myth is incorrect and that most of our convicts were sent to the US. And you guys don't seem to have any issues with violence!!

    Mind you, then theres the "wardrobe malfunction" that shocked the country. The US attitude to sex is similar to many other countries attitude to sex. Better to make life than end it, if you ask me!

  124. Re:New Features by kisrael · · Score: 1

    Yeah...actually GTA:VC had a great "pick up and play and cause mayhem" aspect that I wonder if this new game with its more expansive levels and #)#$)#$ levelling up will match...

    --
    SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
  125. PC is to console as... by PhoenixOne · · Score: 1
    Parent is on target. I *never* have mod points when I need them! ;)

    Here is a simple SAT answer for you, "When it comes to game sales, PC is to console as Mac is to PC".

    --
    Spell cheek you've failed me four the last thyme!
  126. URL-fu!!!! by solipsiae · · Score: 1

    Man, I thought I'd gotten rid of all them fancy words when I went on that post-college bender... Guess I'll just have to play more GTA:SA until I can replace things like "epistemic phraseology" with "bitch-ass busta."

  127. Interesting... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link.

    The GTA series is great because of the stories, which a game simply *must* have if it isn't going to go follow the multiplayer/online model.

    However, the non-linear nature of the game lends itself beautifully to a multi-player environment. Unlike many game designs, I think that GTA would scale nicely without changing much of anything. Pleayers could form competing gangs, fight over properlties, and create havok as much as they wanted. Simply drop the NPC gang AI's and let the player fill the space. The missions and story elements are nicely modular, so they would fit well into an online world.

    If the idea hasn't already been considered there, pass it on. (Personally, I would kill for a chance to code on a project like that...)

    BTW, Great work! Now hurry up and port that @#$$#%er to PC, I have $50 burning a hole in my pocket...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  128. Re:New Features by MendicantMonkey · · Score: 1

    Yes, there's at least one club where you can dance, and the dancing is a rhythm game, like Pa Rappa or DDR.

  129. dig it by terraambient · · Score: 1

    Although it took me s little longer to get into this one than "Vice City", this IS the greatest video game ever conceived.