Slashdot Mirror


Cingular-AT&T Wireless Merger Complete

bigmase521 writes "PRNNewsWire, Phonescoop.com, and this thread on Howardforums.com, are reporting that the Cingular/AT&T Wireless Merger is now complete. Cingular bought out AT&T Wireless for ~$41B to become the nations largest cellular provider. Details of the merger, and full press coverage, including the audio of this afternoon's conference call can be found here, and Cingular and AT&T customers can see what is/isn't changing for them at newcingular.com."

331 comments

  1. Should have happened sooner by BWJones · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its too bad this could not have taken place sooner. I dumped AT&T a few months ago due to very poor customer service and because AT&T had absurdly high rates for international calling when I travel (calls from New Zealand to the US were something like $8.00/minute with AT&T) I went with T-Mobile at the time and have been for the most part satisfied, although coverage in remote areas of the American West is weak due to a less well developed GSM network. After reading an article in the Wall St. Journal (not linked because its a subscription article) this morning, it turns out however, even if I had remained with AT&T nee Cingular I would have had to deal with the same coverage issues because Cingular will move their customers from TDMA phones to GSM phones.

    So, just like when the TDMA markets were rolling out some years ago, it took a couple years to expand them to remote areas. I suspect fairly uniform GSM coverage throughout remote areas in the near future. Perhaps if Cingular provides better service and lower rates, they might win myself and many others back.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The subscriber base for TDMA vs GSM at AT&T was about 10:1 when I worked there until this past Spring. That's roughly 20 mil to 2 mil on their respective networks. I would not be surprised if Cingular had a similar split since TDMA has been deployed for about a decade while GSM in the U.S. has only been around for 3-4 years.

    2. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do mergers make for better customer service and lower rates anyway?

    3. Re:Should have happened sooner by bluprint · · Score: 1

      I've had Cingular for 3-4 years now, and been very happy with it.

      Before that, years before, I had an Alltel phone.

      One thing I'm curious about, in the fairly limited time I've had a cell (about 4-5 years total) I've only really had 1 problem. Sometime this summer, it seems my phone was somehow dropped from the network...semi-permanently. Anyhow, I went to the Cingular store and they fixed it quickly, but what I'm curious about is, how many problems (or other experiences...) have you had over the years that led to any meaningful conclusion about customer service?

      --
      A modern day witchhunt.
    4. Re:Should have happened sooner by cswiii · · Score: 1

      I dumped AT&T a few months ago due to very poor customer service and because AT&T had absurdly high rates for international calling when I travel (calls from New Zealand to the US were something like $8.00/minute with AT&T)

      Best thing to do is to obtain an unlocked phone.

      I bought an unlocked phone on ebay recently; While on layover in MIA, en route to Curaçao a few weeks ago, I was told by ATTWS that calls to the US from Curaçao would be $1.69/minute.

      It wasn't long before I found a phone shop down there, bought a prepaid SIM and was able to make calls to the US at a much more reasonable rate of 35c/min.

    5. Re:Should have happened sooner by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had Voicestream/T-Mobile in a densly populated area in the East (Bergen County, NJ -- I live 10 or 15 miles from NYC, Paramus is here [I have been told it has the largest shopper to citizen ratio of any town/city in the US, and most of the stores are closed Sundays due to blue laws], and T-Mobile gave me the crappiest coverage I've seen. I stood in the middle of a major area highway (Route 4, it leads directly to the George Washington Bridge) and got nothing. Cingular used to use T-Mobile for east coast coverage, but they may be moving to AT&Ts towers. Also, AT&T Wireless was planning to move the whole system to GSM even before the announcement of the Cingular merger.

    6. Re:Should have happened sooner by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Informative

      aah, phone unlocking.

      Greatest thing ever, IMHO. I'm both a Cingular and ATT customer at the moment. (long story short)
      I have 3 differnt phones (and rotate like girls rotate through shoes). All my phones are unlocked so it doesn't matter if I pop my cingular SIM into the ATT phone.

      Going international? Not a problem with calls (prepaid sim as the parent said).

      So, how to unlock?

      Firstly, IS IT ILLEGAL? I don't think so. Technically, even if "free", you paid for the phone when you signed the contract. I'm locked in for the 12-24+ months with ATT/Cingular. The phone locking scheme is to prevent me from using my Cingular branded Motorola V400 with ATT- and ATT hopes I'll buy a V600 instead (but no, i'm paying 7 bucks tax for the "free" phone.
      This article from oreillynet.com says its not too

      I've only unlocked Nokia phones so far. So, if its nokia, download from cnet here.

      insatall, find imei by punching in #*06#. Put that IMEI into the code generator. Turn off phone, take out sim card. Turn on phone again. Now, you need to punch in the unlock code generated from the program. DO NOT SCREW UP THE UNLOCK CODE! I WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE IF YOU PERMANENTLY LOCK YOUR PHONE. IF YOUR AFRAID YOU MIGHT SCREW IT UP, THEN DON'T EVEN TRY.

      moving on. Once your phone is unlocked, it can be used with ANY carrier. That's right. ANY carrier. To prove my point, I have ATT on my Cingular branded V400 and a Cingular Sim on my ATT branded Nokia.

      Happy unlocking!
      Grump

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    7. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Here's one (very long) experience.

      I just signed up for a new phone with my carrier, AT&T. I chose a refurbished Nokia phone (a 6820, if it matters). When it arrived, two of the buttons were completely broken and one more was hard to push. This made using the menus (and thus the phone) pretty much impossible. I called in and after a brief discussion, they told me they were going to ship me a replacement phone of the same model (still refurbished).

      It arrived the next day. This time, all the buttons worked, but when I tried to access the phone's IM (instant messaging) feature, it popped up a Java error. Now this is when I got a real taste of customer service.

      I called them and explained the whole situation (how I just signed up and how the first phone I got was broken so I needed a replacement, and how the replacement was broken too). The guy then put me on hold (the first of many, many holds) while he looked into the situation. When he got back, he started to walk me through the AIM-via-text-message setup procedure, which is something completely different. I explained to him that I don't think he and I were talking about the same thing, and that the first phone I got did not have this Java error. But apparently, that info was all he could find. Apparently, their databases didn't even have an entry for the IM menu on my phone, so he had no idea what I was talking about.

      I suggested to him that it seemed to be a software/firmware problem with the phone since the first one didn't have the problem, and I asked him if they could simply ship me another replacement like they did the first time. But he said no, they were all out of stock on that phone (but I just ordered it three days ago...?). After putting me on hold some more, he told me to go to a local AT&T Wireless retail store to "get the phone re-flashed".

      So I did. I found an AT&T Wireless retailer, but the lady there had apparently never seen the problem before. When I explained that customer service told me to go and get it re-flashed at her store, she just gave me a blank stare and asked "Reflashed? What's that?". Then we spoke to another guy at the same store, possibly a manager, and he said "Oh, wow... you need some high-tech stuff to do that. USB cables and such. We don't do that here." The lady chimed in, "In fact... none of the AT&T Wireless stores do." Then I asked why Customer Service sent me to them, and they didn't know either.

      So when I got home, I called customer service again and explained the whole situation all over again. This time, the technician on the line didn't know what re-flashing was either. He said it was a very strange suggestion for the original tech to have made. Then I asked him whether he could just ship me a replacement. He said no, they were out of stock. Then I told him that they were still available at the webpage, so they did have some phones left, and I asked if he could please check to make sure. He put me on hold for a while to talk to his manager, and when he got back, he told me that they didn't ship replacements out like that. I asked him how I got the first replacement, then, but he couldn't explain it. He did suggest, however, that I can go online and order another phone and they would pricematch it after I was billed. I told him my credit card's limit wasn't that high and so that wasn't an option. Then he just told me to call Warranty Exchange. I just thanked him and gave up for the night.

      Annoyed at the entire situation, I ignored it for few more days. I finally called back a few days later. This time, I was sick of explaining everything so I just asked the tech to look at my account notes. She did, and thought about it some. Then, to my surprise, she actually sympathized with the situation and offered to ship me a free replacement phone -- a new one this time, since the past two refurbished ones were both broken. I didn't ask for it; she just offered. I was glad, of course, but then she looked up the phone and foun

    8. Re:Should have happened sooner by ti.payn · · Score: 0

      No fooling. I've never heard anyone wish they could be part of the mess known as a modern-day corporate merger. It is almost like a S&M fetish.

    9. Re:Should have happened sooner by rosewood · · Score: 1

      GSM in the USA has been around for a lot longer then that - I had a GSM phone with Voicestream in 1998.

    10. Re:Should have happened sooner by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      That's AT&T for you...

      On a (somewhat) related note, my purchased (OK, free after instant rebates) NEW Nokia 3588i (Sprint) is losing Menu, 1 and 6 (especially 6 - I have to take the faceplate off to get 6 to work).

    11. Re:Should have happened sooner by rwoodford · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kits are available on eBay to do this to most any phone. I unlocked/unbranded my Ericsson T616 and T68i this way ... all for a grand total of $15. The best part is that I was able to update the firmware in each phone to it's latest revision. This drastically improved the signal reception of my T616.

    12. Re:Should have happened sooner by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1

      On a (somewhat) related note, my purchased (OK, free after instant rebates) NEW Nokia 3588i (Sprint) is losing Menu, 1 and 6 (especially 6 - I have to take the faceplate off to get 6 to work).


      My Sanyo 8200 from Sprint that I purchased new ($120 after $150 rebate) works great. I guess you get what you pay for. Welcome to the world of disposable consumer electronics.

    13. Re:Should have happened sooner by browngb · · Score: 1

      I have had similar experiences with Verizon Wireless (and the other Verizon too). Verizon Wireless boasts that they will solve your problem the first time. What they don't say is that's just one phone call. You may have to talk to 6 different people first. They've always been able to fix the situation, but I have to explain the whole thing to each new person, and no one knows what the other said or did. God help you if one of them says they can't do something, but this other person can. I spent 45 minutes getting bounced back and forth once, because neither could do it and didn't know what to do with me.

      --
      Generally, I get bored with my replies and give up on making sense halfway through.
    14. Re:Should have happened sooner by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      I'll be replacing this with a Samsung SPH-A660 (AKA Vi660) as soon as I can get the rebates on it...

      I don't think I can get away with warranty, seeing as there's physical damage to the faceplate and the antenna (the cap on the end is missing).

    15. Re:Should have happened sooner by Firehawke · · Score: 2, Informative

      I actually used to work for the AT&T wireless division. Sadly, the stores are an entirely seperate division of the company from the rest of the wireless-- it was, as of the time I was there, fairly standard routine to have a phone taken to an AT&T store for a basic reprogramming if required. Unfortunately, that doesn't mean that the stores knew how to do it. Some did, some didn't.

      Personally, if I'd determined that the call was going to take longer than the three minute limit (AT&T talk time policies are a complete and utter bitch.. I routinely got chewed out for taking a little more time on my calls and making sure the job got done right) then I would have immediately looked into the new phone angle. I'm really surprised they didn't get it done sooner, though. How long ago did all of this happen? When I left (four years ago), they still had a very lenient credit policy when it came to crediting someone's account.

      However.. you are right about the lottery thing. Some of my most vivid memories of that job was hearing some of the stuff the guy in the cube in front of me got away with. He had numerous reprimands in his file, but when I left they still hadn't fired him. Not to say they all were that bad-- many of my teammates were really good, but there were just that few that made things worse across the board.

    16. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did customer care for AT&T Wireless... worked for Convergys... in Halifax. Yes, I was one of the ones who can't say where my centre is.
      Anyway, I would have been like the last person you talked too. I hated giving the customer the run around. There were too many reps who used hold too much, and too many reps that just didn't give a damn. Lack of knowledge, lack of desire, lack of care. Not a lack of training, 6 weeks should have been enough!

      I gave a large number of phones away, and probably a few too many credits for usage charges. I would rather give away $20 of AT&T Wireless' money than lose the customer for them. I think my higher ups agreed, because I did get good raises, and always scored 100% on quality monitoring.

      Treat the customer how you want to be treated. Respect is key. That was my thought on the topic.

      I agree it is all who your call is routed to, sometimes even the call centre you are routed to. Some people are idiots, some are nice.

    17. Re:Should have happened sooner by RESPAWN · · Score: 1

      So, just like when the TDMA markets were rolling out some years ago, it took a couple years to expand them to remote areas. I suspect fairly uniform GSM coverage throughout remote areas in the near future. Perhaps if Cingular provides better service and lower rates, they might win myself and many others back.

      This is exactly why I switched from Cingular to, of all people, Sprint. I had been a Cingular customer for over 2 years and contractless for well over a year. I was constantly over my minutes, so I needed a new plan, and my phone was starting to flake out, so I needed one of those too. I was surprised at their lack of netogiating to keep me as a customer, considering I always paid my bills on time (except for the one I never got), including a couple of $150+ bills. They of couse wanted to sell me a GSM phone, as well as try to force me to sign a new contract since I had to switch my billing plan. When I expressed my concern over the lack of GSM in rural areas they tried to sell me a GAIT plan for even more money. I then told them that they were out of their mind if they thought that 1) I was going to pay even more money to have the same level of service I already had 2) I was going to sign a new contract to do this and 3) their GAIT phones sucked. I was already mad about the month where I didn't get my bill and they were unwilling to drop the service charge, but it was only $1.50 so I didn't argue it too much.

      So, I switched to Sprint where I get a discount through work. For less than twice my monthly Cingular bill I now get twice as many minutes, 7:00 PM nights and weekends, no roaming anywhere in the nation (as long as less than half my minutes are roaming minutes), and PCS Vision. Oh, and I have the added ability to actually make and receive calls in my office or in the server room now. That's right. I'm getting better service with Sprint. That's not to say that Sprint doesn't have their issues. Sometimes the handoffs in rural areas don't occur correclty causing dropped calls. Doubly so when I'm on roam, but that's to be expected. Also, the service at my parents' house is marginal, but that's not a huge issue since I can always just force roam and get a great signal, probably from the Cingular tower less than a mile from the house. The only real beef I have is that sometimes the signal in my apartment is sketchy, mostly in the hallway next to the washer, dryer, and AC unit, so it can probably be attributed to too much RF interference. Oh, and I have had some people tell me that sometimes when they call me the phone just rings and rings and rings and then goes to voicemail, when my phone never got the call at all. But, all the providers have their issues. It's just that, now I feel like I'm actually getting what I pay for.

      --

      If Murphy's Law can go wrong, it will.

    18. Re:Should have happened sooner by chickygrrl · · Score: 1

      It is almost like a S&M fetish.

      Then I must be one of those hard-core fetishists then, because I have a blast working during these times. About 7 years ago I worked tech support with about 4-5 other folks for a small local ISP that had a habit of buying out other smaller ISPs across the country, expanding our customer base by 20k in the course of an afternoon. Nothing would amuse us more than coming into work at 8am, getting an email at 11am saying we just aquired a mess of new customers from Arkansas, and spending the next 2 days fielding "my internet is broken!" calls from people who would believe us when we told them rebooting their computer would literally reboot the entire internet.

      Soon after that I started working tech support for Fleet Bank, and got plunged headfirst into their merger with Bank Boston - fun times. Hold times typically lasted 2-3 hours, and at least one or two techs each night would take a call from someone who had been on hold so long they'd fallen asleep and was snoring. Those who didn't wait on hold emailed us; the backlog of emails lasted 8 months after the merge. Within a week after the merge, half of the reps I'd trained with had quit. Of course, to help us poor reps keep up our spirits, we were given cookies and sodas and goodie bags featuring things like Silly Putty (in blue and green eggs), Lego blocks emblazoned with the Fleet logo, and stress balls, which we threw at each other.

      Three years of the quiet life must have bored me, since I'm currently working for Cingular and actually looking forward to getting some life in this place. Not that I'll get all that much since I'm in a kiosk, but it'll keep me on my toes.

    19. Re:Should have happened sooner by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      I worked there from Nov 2002 to Jan of this year, and they have cracked down on the discretionary credit. IT sucked to be us when we felt the credit was necessary but we had to run around trying to find a supervisor to ok it or get through to resolution to explain to them and defend your decision to issue the credit. Good times.

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
    20. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time BUY a phone, cheapskate.

    21. Re:Should have happened sooner by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1
      The problem is that we aren't allowed to give away things for free to existing customers. Equipment given away once (at a loss) is fine, as it at least gets someone on contract.. equipment sold at a loss twice makes the customer essentially worthless from a business standpoint.

      You have to think that the more you get credited, or the more you get for free, the less you're worth to the company. Getting a second, expensive phone for free makes me suspect that unless you're on a $199 per month or more plan, you're actually costing the company money. You've gone way past the ZERO PROFIT point.

      As lousy as your service may have been, I guess you can take the consolation prize that ATT Wireless is providing you service at a LOSS to themselves.

    22. Re:Should have happened sooner by charleste · · Score: 1

      I've been happy with AT&T - because I tend to be traveling in the vast-towerless-expanse known as West of the Mississippi/East of the Sierra Nevadas in western USA. I always wonder *why* people have to deal with customer service (I've heard repeatedly people saying AT&T has horrid customer service). I have only had to call them once in 5 years: because we left a phone in the truck at the airport, suspended service until we got back, reinstated it just fine when we found the phone wasn't taken. What kinds of reasons do people need to call customer service for? Just curious...

    23. Re:Should have happened sooner by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the tip! I successfully unlocked my Nokia 3395 because of you. Oh, and you don't even need to download the program. Their web site, http://unlock.nokiafree.org/, lets you unlock it online. (I tried running the program on my computer, but every time I hit 'Calculate', the program would mysteriously disappear.)

    24. Re:Should have happened sooner by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      Look I understand the thought about not giving away free new phones. But if his is broken from the time he recieved it... it's a totally separate issue.

    25. Re:Should have happened sooner by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      I don't see why you had to do anything to the V-400. It's unlocked out of the box, as confirmed by cingular, and by the fact that I popped a virgin mobile SIM in it while travelling to the UK with no modifications. Worked just fine. From what I understand cingular doesn't lock most of their phones.

    26. Re:Should have happened sooner by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      your very welcome. I tried the onlnie ulnock once, but they wanted a registration or something...so i downloaded the prog instead. =P

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    27. Re:Should have happened sooner by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      really? All my cingular phones have been locked...i think(ericson POS, nok 8290, nok 5190)

      V400 not being locked is actually new to me. I thought it was some special thing because I got it through Mot employee purchase program. Oh well, I was interested in getting a phone with no contract. and the v400 was 200 bucks, unlocked, no contract when i got it.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    28. Re:Should have happened sooner by haroldK · · Score: 1

      That's kind of how customer service call centers work. I've been in 2 of them. The people that care the most about actually helping the customer usually end up getting shit on because of the way things are set up. Call centers have high turnover rates, so they'll hire just about anybody and the ones that are there the longest are usually the ones who keep their talk times low and call volumes high at the expense of the customer experience. I'm sure you can find an article or two about this.

    29. Re:Should have happened sooner by OzzyRulez · · Score: 1

      Check out compaqsucks.com. You can pretty much replace "Compaq" with any major brand name or service provider, and all the stories will be the same.

    30. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, along with the phone, I did sign up for a new one-year contract. I don't understand why being an existing customer would matter? They're still getting the same amount of money from me every year.

      And if AT&T really is losing money, that doesn't make me happy or anything. I have nothing against them. All I wanted was a new phone and a new year of service... it's not my fault that the first two phones they sent me were broken. It's not unreasonable to expect a phone in working condition, is it?

    31. Re:Should have happened sooner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In response to both the parent and grandparent:

      This all happened about a week or two ago. And the lottery thing... I really think that's it. It's not just AT&T, but most companies that I've had to talk to for support.

      And about the credit, the lady did seem to be concerned. I believe I told her I wouldn't mind another refurbished phone, as long as everything worked. She had to talk to herself and consider it for a bit, but ultimately decided that she could justify a new one because I shouldn't have to deal with a broken one a third time. It was a nice gesture and I really hope she doesn't get in trouble for it.

    32. Re:Should have happened sooner by Zoshnell · · Score: 1

      I feel the same way, but at least from when I was fired any credit over 24.99 had to be accompanied by a one year extension, and alot of reps and supervisors toed that line because they feared for their jobs. Luckily I didn't. Sucked to be me in January tho!

      --
      "Do you suppose that's why God lives in the Heavens? Because he lives in fear of His creations?" - Steve Buscemi
  2. Network wierdness by CptChipJew · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have AT&T, and the area I live in (Los Angeles County) has lots of Cingular zones. Whenever my phone in on a Cingular network, I have to dial the area code of people I am trying to reach who are in the same area code as me. If you try to just dial the number without the area code, Cingular says it cant connect.

    This just happened to me again today, so this merger may be complete business-wise, but there are still bugs to work out of the network.

    --
    Vonal Declosion
    1. Re:Network wierdness by chrispyman · · Score: 1

      I've also had that oddity happen a few times with Cingular, but only when I've roamed out of my home area code. I suspect that since LA has many area codes in such close proximity you're probably roaming outside your area code more often than you would in, say, a larger (geographically speaking) sized area code.

    2. Re:Network wierdness by JerkBoB · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have to dial the area code of people I am trying to reach who are in the same area code as me.

      Get used to it. Lots of carriers in metro areas are moving to 10-digit dialing. Boston's been that way for years, and I know other big(ish) cities are doing the same thing. Now it's weird for me to see a 7-digit number, because I've gotten so used to the extra three digits.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    3. Re:Network wierdness by CptChipJew · · Score: 1

      I don't think thats it. I'm in the 818 area, which is pretty large. Pretty much the whole of San Fernando Valley is on the same area code.

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    4. Re:Network wierdness by tonsofpcs · · Score: 1

      All of the area code I live in [Bergen County, NJ] and surrounding area codes always have to dial 10 digits, 11 digits for out of the region.
      That being said, any cellphone I used here (even old analog ones before digital networks were popular) requires/-ed the area code to be dialed.

    5. Re:Network wierdness by lothar97 · · Score: 1
      I have AT&T, and the area I live in (Los Angeles County) has lots of Cingular zones.

      I'm in San Diego. Over the summer, when getting a new phone in the AT&T Wireless Store, the salesperson said they were in the process of integrating the networks. Towers were being converted over, and sometimes I would get Cingular, but usually AT&T. I'm in an area with just 1 area code.

      Today, my phone was solid Cingular (first time ever) until early afternoon. Now it's AT&T (I've tried turning it off a few times), so I wonder if today was just a test. I did get better reception in my apt. when under Cingular.

      --

    6. Re:Network wierdness by Phule77 · · Score: 1

      About a year back, Verizon declared cell phones (at least, so far as I know, cell phones that aren't them) long distance.

      So all of our Boston customers, at least, suddenly had to start dialing the area code. Caused no end of fluff.

      Generally, if you pick up a GSM phone with Cingular, you will need to expect to dial the area code. Due to WLNP issues and landline conflicts (especially as the Landlines separate from Cell with VOIP/WIMAX) you're going to see more and more issues like that, since cell phones almost always are, except in cases where they are directly owned by the local landline company, competition that the landlines can't afford.

      --
      Listen to me Peter, I want this bench. You go sit on that bench over there, and if you're good I'll tell you the rest of
    7. Re:Network wierdness by rwoodford · · Score: 1

      Cingular should allow you to dial 7 digits to numbers in your area code in LA ... the dial plans for the area allow it. AT&T Wireless follows the dial plans as specified at the NANPA http://nanpa.com/area_codes/index.html ... do a search for your area code to see the allowed dial patterns.

      A lot of other areas are moving to a forced 10 digit pattern because they are doing area code overlays of a physical area. LA has been doing splits of areas when introducing a new NPA. The 7 digit dialing is almost always retained when this happens.

      I'm an employee on the AT&T side of this merger and this is something that will have to be fixed relatively soon. Our customers scream bloody murder if their 7 digit dialing breaks for any reason ... so I doubt that it's going away. My hopes are that it'll come to a Cingular network near you.

      I'll get back to you on whether I welcome my new Cingular overloards ...

    8. Re:Network wierdness by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      How hard would it be to just have the phone do this? Regardless of the network, dialing a 7 digit number could just automatically cause it to be prefixed with your number's area code. That would be an even easier solution.

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    9. Re:Network wierdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The problem arises when you leave your area code, and your phonebook is full of 7-digit numbers. Let's say you live in north MS, which has area code 662, and you travel to central MS (601). When you were in your home area, you saved all your local numbers as 7-digit numbers in your phonebook, so, when you'd dial them, the phone would dial 662-xxx-xxxx. Now, when you're in central MS, you dial the same number. Since you didn't specify an area code, the network assumes you're dialing 601-xxx-xxxx, and you get the wrong number.

      That's the problem with 7-digit dialing on a mobile device. I realize that many people here would be aware of this situation and not make a bonehead mistake like this, but, believe me, many people do. I get quite a few calls on my work phone from people trying to reach a doctor's office that happens to share my number, but with an area code south of me. These are people doing exactly what I described above.

    10. Re:Network wierdness by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Your telephone number on the Public Switched Telephone Network is not unique without the country code and area code. The North American country code is '1' and your area code is whatever it is; but your area code could just as easily look like a local exchange prefix, so how would the switch know how to interpret the number you are dialing (the address of your call) without 10 digit dialing?

      Think of my buddy's auto parts store whose number is 213-8778...should the switch think you are calling downtown L.A. or what? There's the rub!

      This is why it is misleading for people to write phone numbers with the area code as some sort of red-headed stepchild (apologies to you redheads out there); what is the point of writing (213) 456-1234?? I can count how many digits are there if I really only need 7 of them, but it leads us into bad habits that will bite us in the ass sooner or later. Why not write your i.p. address as (10) 1.1.11 or something? Makes no sense.

      So 10 digit dialing is just a lazy man's cheat that will be forced to go away as more and more addresses (phone numbers) are added to the network. It is inevitable.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    11. Re:Network wierdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an employee of ATTWS, I can assure you that nothing has been done to the network as of yet. The only new difference I know of, is that our website now has a Cingular Logo on it. Welcome to a better wireless world. www.attws.com

    12. Re:Network wierdness by Bobman1235 · · Score: 1

      Whenever my phone in on a Cingular network, I have to dial the area code of people I am trying to reach who are in the same area code as me. If you try to just dial the number without the area code, Cingular says it cant connect.

      I am utterly amazed that in Los Angeles county this is not commonplace. I live in Massachusetts, and always have to dial an area code, even if I'm calling next door, or the other line in my own house (same area code, obv). Have had to do so for like, 8 years or something. So, this most likely is not a passing inconvenience or bug, but instead something you're going to have to get used to. Phone numbers are 10 digits long, not seven anymore.

    13. Re:Network wierdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, what with 10 digits not going to last long enough.

      That's the one reason that I hope IPv6 rolls out soon. Wouldn't it be sweet if our wireless phones had IPs, just as everything else, and our phone service was basically VoIP, and our addresses were like omghi2u@wireless.phone, or even our own vanity domain name? All you would have to do is redirect the DNS! Forward your home phone to your wireless when you walked away (bluetooth)!

      Really cool possibilities--too bad they'll never let it work.

  3. Hopefully.. by keeleysam · · Score: 1

    they can compromise networks FAST so we cal all get better coverage.

    --
    Nothing for you to see here, Please move along.
    1. Re:Hopefully.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compromise? Is that a Freudian slip?

  4. Can you say.... by metlin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ....Deja Vu?

    Funny thing, back then Ma-Bell was broken down for anti-trust reasons, now all these giants are bigger than what Bell Labs ever was.

    And they are all merging. That's a very scary thought.

    I think a few years from now, almost all the business will be controlled by just a few corporations.

    I personally am not sure if that would be a good idea, that would certainly put smaller companies and businesses out, and these would not stand a chance against the big corporations.

    Not too sure how I feel about this.

    1. Re:Can you say.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I agree. But unfortunately, it doesn't seem like the USA government is moving to break up these big guys.

      Oil (and we see crazy prices), desktop OS (and we see crazy prices), cell phones now (really they are crazy prices), etc etc... ok I can't think of other examples, but you guys will help me out here.

      When the number of companies providing service dwindles, the customer always will pay more, despite the company PR saying "oh this merger will improve service blah blah for our customers" OK, we know customer service sucks, so why not just make it cheaper for us?

      Anyawy, I agree, monopoly = bad for us consumers.

      Come on USA government, slow them down!!!

    2. Re:Can you say.... by alienw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, if you think a couple of cellphone companies merging constitutes anything like the ma bell monopoly, you must be smoking something good. It's not like Cingular has anything except cellphone service, and even then it's doesn't have even 80% of the market. There are currently about 4 other companies I can think of that are in the cellphone business. That's way too many as it is.

    3. Re:Can you say.... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think a few years from now, almost all the business will be controlled by just a few corporations.
      You're right. It WILL be controlled by 'just a few corporations' because it already IS controlled by 'just a few corporations.

      There are economic reasons for this. Mainly that being a telecom company is expensive. You must have lines, switching systems, employees, et cetera. Competition is often a good thing, and it's often a bad thing. Some things, like telecos, power/water/propane supply on a local scale, cable companies on a local scale... why? Because every competitor requires a duplication of effort to achieve the same goal, and split the profit. After a certain point, boom. NOBODY is profitable and they ALL go tits-up.

      Ma-bell wasn't broken up because it was big, it was broken up because there was no way others could get into the market otherwise. It's not always compitition which keeps the market efficient, it's the THREAT of competition or elimination which does it. Utility companies generally try to keep rates low despite their monopolies because the state/county/city can kick them out if they don't. Cable companies try to keep rates competitive with satellite, and offer benefits over broadcast TV. Telecom companies, so long as there is at least a threat of being broken up to restore competition, will do the same (in theory).

      As long as there are at least two companies (preferably three), the only thing we have to fear is collusion. As it is now, they're playing "Who can undercut the others on the wireless service"... POTS is more expensive still, but that's to be expected since wires costs money... Blah, I'm turning into an economics professor. You can make up the rest, turn your homework into my inbox.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    4. Re:Can you say.... by Zinoc · · Score: 1

      Just what the world needs! More fledging transnational corporate powerhouses buying out any potential competition! YaY for us.

    5. Re:Can you say.... by metlin · · Score: 1

      You misunderstand me.

      Ma-Bell had a monopoly because they were the effectively the first people to establish such a huge network.

      No, I'm not talking merely in terms of coverage and areas. I'm in talking in terms of financial power and effectively arm-twisting capabilities.

      Look at them - Microsoft, AOL-Time Warner, Cingular-AT&T, etc. They effectively control a large chunk of the media. You must be smoking something if you think that these guys can't squash a small player if they didn't like them.

      It's not like AOL had anything other than Internet service, and it's not like Warner has anything other than entertainment. But they are effectively a single company, and that's what is scary.

      I was talking of the phenomenon of large-mergers, which could be stiffling to smaller companies simply because all it would take is a bunch of lawsuits to kill innovation. We already see it happening.

      Btw, more choices is not a bad thing, it's a good thing.

    6. Re:Can you say.... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

      Anyawy, I agree, monopoly = bad for us consumers.

      Come on USA government, slow them down!!!


      USA government? you mean the same guys whose pockets are chock full of these corporations' money?

      Let me introduce you to the word "naive"...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    7. Re:Can you say.... by alienw · · Score: 1

      Well, a major problem with the free market is that it tends to become monopolized rather quickly. The only thing that can prevent it is government anti-trust controls. So far, they have been functioning, but of course that won't be for long if Republicans have their way with their corporate welfare agenda.

      By "too many", I didn't mean that it's a bad thing for the consumer -- on the contrary, competition is very good. It's just that it's not a sustainable market situation -- eventually, some of those companies will merge.

    8. Re:Can you say.... by cubicledrone · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's not like Cingular has anything except cellphone service, and even then it's doesn't have even 80% of the market.

      Whew, not even 80%? That's a relief.

      There are currently about 4 other companies I can think of that are in the cellphone business.

      That many, huh?

      That's way too many as it is.

      Run 'em all outta business. That'll be great for consumers.

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    9. Re:Can you say.... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      And then, eventually customers will get pissed, and the company will collapse (unless the Republicans get corporate welfare in). The only time where that won't work is if the monopoly on essential products (food, clothing, etc., etc.)

    10. Re:Can you say.... by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Cingular+AT&T
      Sprint
      Verizon
      Alltel (they DO have national coverage, anyway)
      T-Mobile
      US Cellular (I know they exist, but I think there are large areas where you can't buy their phones (where I live, for one). They still work, though - we looked at US Cellular when trying to find a good actual plan (we were on prepaid))
      Nextel
      Tracfone (does that count, though?)

      Virgin Mobile and Boost aren't listed - they are really Sprint and Nextel's prepaid services, and Boost is most definitely not nationwide.

    11. Re:Can you say.... by oilisgood · · Score: 1

      Back in the 80s there was an article in Fortune about how there would not be a Fortune 500 in a few years because of all of the mergers.

      Well, it never happened.

      There was another article just a couple years ago revisting that article showing how with every major merger there are groups of individuals that come out of the mergers to form their own startup and some of those grow into Fortune 500 companies.

      So, I doubt that the merger of two cellphone companies will lead to a giant mega corporation running the whole industry. There is too much competition.

    12. Re:Can you say.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      The only time where that won't work is if the monopoly on essential products (food, clothing, etc., etc.)
      ...I'd probably add "telecommunications" to that list.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    13. Re:Can you say.... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Telephone systems are an area in which haveing a large network in coverage and areas is a huge factor in monopoly (if phone systems don't interoperate everyone would prefer to be on the one with the most customers). AOL-TimeWarner shouldn't be concerning as management has pissed away any advantages that could have accrued from the merger. That merger was mostly .comers buying something real (50% or was it 60% of TimeWarner) for their paper assets before the great musical chair game ended. I doubt the FCC/Justice department will allow another merger in cellular in which the acquired company has more than 10 million subs.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    14. Re:Can you say.... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      People can SURVIVE without communications. They NEED food, they NEED clothing in some climates.

      Of course, it's almost impossible to have a monopoly on food without government involvement (wait a second...), but if it happened, we'd be slaves to it.

    15. Re:Can you say.... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      This is the 21st Century. Our population centers, the sizes of population in certain areas, the types of food we buy and use, the jobs we used to purchase food, are all dependent on a particular type of infrastructure.

      If the price of local calls went up to $1 a minute tomorrow, with long distance and mobile phone air time costing double that, do you think people could easily just throw their phones away, and still perform the same amount of business, ensuring the food is still delivered and paid for?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    16. Re:Can you say.... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      Boost Mobile, otherwise known as Ghettophone. Have you seen their commercials?

    17. Re:Can you say.... by alienw · · Score: 1

      A monopoly can never collapse by itself. Think about it. If they are the only ones providing a necessary product, they will do very well. Customers can get as pissed as they want, but it's not like they can just stop using cellphones. It doesn't have to be an essential product, it just needs to be a somewhat useful one.

    18. Re:Can you say.... by DA-MAN · · Score: 1

      Boost Mobile, otherwise known as Ghettophone. Have you seen their commercials?

      Where ya at?

      --
      Can I get an eye poke?
      Dog House Forum
    19. Re:Can you say.... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Then how can consumers say that they won't get x because of the company that makes it, and that company is the only one that makes x?

    20. Re:Can you say.... by DarkAdonis · · Score: 1

      It's not like Cingular has anything except cellphone service Cingular is actually a joint-venture between BellSouth Corp and SBC Communications, Inc. If you have both Cingular mobile phone service and SBC telephone service, you can combine the Cingular and SBC bills into one statement.

  5. EDGE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What does this mean for the AT&T edge network? I still dream of having high speed wireless everywhere...someday. Oh, and not too expensive.

    1. Re:EDGE by vm · · Score: 1

      That old thing? They gave it to me because they were bored with it. I'm giving out free phones and shares of the Brooklyn Bridge if you sign up now!

  6. Biggest in the... by Jameth · · Score: 0, Troll

    Okay, so it's the biggest in the nation.

    Being a huge fan of bigger-dick contests, I'm just wondering what the biggest cellular company in the world is. Is this one it? Anyone know?

    1. Re:Biggest in the... by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      I believe T-Mobile is. They were originally a European company before they bought a wireless co or 2 in the US. And I also believe before they got into the US they were the biggest in the world (maybe minus the US). But I'm also just talking from memory, and I'll be the first to say my human memory is nowhere near as exact as computer memory.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    2. Re:Biggest in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why?

      Are you gay?

    3. Re:Biggest in the... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope.

      Vodafone.

      They're not in the US. About 6 billion people aren't either.

      (Note: I *AM* in the US. I use Sprint. Commence mocking!)

      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    4. Re:Biggest in the... by Zero98aTm · · Score: 2, Informative

      Vodafone owns 44% of Verizon Wireless, so they are in the US. Sort of. In that half-assed sort of way.

    5. Re:Biggest in the... by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I did ask for a correction if I was wrong. I was just going by what I had known.

      Oh, and I know that the US isn't even close to a large part of the world.... I was just saying they are a pretty large force. I don't think I've really heard of any place but the US having people with multiple phones/pagers, etc (I've seen people who are businessmen or sysadmins with 2-4 cell phones and 1-4 pagers). Seems like a bit of overkill to me, but I could be wrong again.

      I also have heard of Vodafone and yes, they are in the US. Though they mostly work through domestic wireless providers.

      There are very few companies without a hand in the US. Vodafone is one that is wildly successful outside the US (from what I've found on them) but only a small force in the US.

      Blah, blah, blah. I should stop posting after midnight. I tend to ramble like a man 4 times my age....

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    6. Re:Biggest in the... by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 1

      According to CNet "With 46.6 million subscribers, Japan-based DoCoMo is both the world's largest cell phone provider and a breeding ground for new services that find their way into markets worldwide."

      --

      Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    7. Re:Biggest in the... by rsidd · · Score: 1
      There is a very good reason the big international cellphone companies (Vodafone, Orange, etc) find it hard going in the US. The rest of the world mostly uses GSM; the US uses CDMA. A GSM company can't just acquire a US company and get going: the infrastructure is all wrong. (Actually, T-Mobile and, I think, Cingular use GSM even in the US, so this may eventually change.)

      Also, in the rest of the world, SMS and other value-added services are big (and big money-spinners). For some reason the US market seems resistant to that: people use their mobile phones for talking and for nothing else; even SMS is almost unheard of. That may give international companies some pause if they're thinking of making a push into the US...

    8. Re:Biggest in the... by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

      This is off the top of my head, so don't hold me to it, but I thought I read in Wired like 2 years ago that DoCoMo was an AT&T partner. I wonder how that plays into this merger.

    9. Re:Biggest in the... by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1
      Eh, Denny Striegel of Verizon Wireless has a HUGE proverbial dick and he's out to fuck the planet along with anyone gullible enough to work for VZW and that eventually trancends to the customers. Credit where it's due though. His network is an extention of his penis. Someday, VZW will be the largest in the world - perhaps the solar system. Oh, and I also predict that at that time "candy bar" phones will become stylish again and strangely phalic. "Can you feel, er, hear me now? Good!"

      -A VZW vet.

    10. Re:Biggest in the... by FrYGuY101 · · Score: 0
      The rest of the world mostly uses GSM; the US uses CDMA.
      Vodafone uses W-CDMA.

      That said, ALLTEL, Sprint PCS, and Verizon Wireless use CDMA, AT&T Wireless, Cingular, and T-Mobile use GSM, and Nextel uses some proprietary TDMA-based system.
      --
      "If we let things terrify us, life will not be worth living."

      - Seneca
    11. Re:Biggest in the... by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      W-CDMA is 3rd Gen STANDARD GSM technology that is comming in in europe and throughout the world, allowing video calling, and high speed net access.

      To say Vodafone uses W-CDMA is misleading as you are implying they are not a GSM (based on TDMA) company. Vodafone IS a GSM company, based in the UK, and also exisiting in, amongst others, Australia, New Zealand, etc, use GSM (specifically GSM 900) and are slowly introducing 3rd Gen GSM using the WCDMA in UK and other countries.

      I think in general, people in the US dont understand that GSM is a STANDARD, and not a specific Technology. GSM defines certain rules and services (SMS, MMS, GPRS, WAP, SMIL, Voicemail, ROaming), that is required to support, and a base Technology to support those services.

      Currently, GSM 2nd Gen (including 2.5 Gen) uses a form of TDMA on frequencies 900/1800 (everywhere except north america) and 1900 (North America).

      We are now moving onto 3rd Gen which uses a form of CDMA (W-CDMA) to provide the same GSM services, plus more, buth with increased bandwidth thanks to the technology change.

      So to summarise, we can say that Vodafone IS a GSM company as it follows the standards set by the GSM consortium.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    12. Re:Biggest in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on how you define 'biggest'. Vodafone is the most international provider, but the largest by the number of subscribers I think is a Chinese operator (with more than 160 million subscribers, adding 2.5 million users per month).

    13. Re:Biggest in the... by Phule77 · · Score: 1

      While text messaging has been up and running for nearly a decade or so in Europe, they didn't pick it up for a long time in the U.S. because the industry as a whole didn't care for how it was implemented.

      It's turned out to be something of a mixed blessing. Text messaging, which was originally created so that cell companies could update their phones over the air, all travels through third party carriers, which is why you can send a text to most anybody (at least intranationally, international tends to be a bit of a hassle in many cases, though T-Mobile seems to mostly have that beat), unlike MMS, which is mostly intracarrier protocol driven, and thus conflicts badly with other carriers.

      The issue the U.S. has run into with text, besides the fact that it's relatively new (though believe me, the kids at school where cell phones are allowed love it) is that the companies have a lot of issues deciding how they're going to bill it.

      You're generally more likely to find plans with unlimited internet than unlimited sms, because the general business model dictates that you're going to get your money off of per use 10 cent charges, or what have you.

      But then, most of the US data models are a little strange.

      --
      Listen to me Peter, I want this bench. You go sit on that bench over there, and if you're good I'll tell you the rest of
    14. Re:Biggest in the... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Out of the US we don't need more than one phone - all phones made in the last few years function perfectly well as both a phone and an alphanumeric pager (via SMS). Most phones sold now above the basic level include GPRS for internet access.

      Pagers are almost redundant outside the US - there's only specialised places (such as hospitals, where mobile phones are prohibited) that still use them.

    15. Re:Biggest in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoa whoa whoa!

      AT&T Wireless has both a strong TDMA network(NOT CDMA - CDMA = CANADA) and a large GSM network that was expanding rapidly before the merger. Most of the world, including the USA, uses mostly GSM networks now. Only about 10 countries internationally that have cellular service are still TDMA based.

      As I said in the "Insider Scoop" thread, I work at an outsourced AT&T call center(Canada), so I know what I am talking about, I don't mean to sound like a dick, but its the truth lol.

    16. Re:Biggest in the... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Vodafone uses GSM. W-CDMA is actually a UMTS system, and UMTS is best described as GSM version 2. Cingular implements both IS-136 and GSM, and is slowly moving up to some varient of UMTS.

      As you say, Sprint PCS, Verizon Wireless, and ALLTEL use the IS-95 standard; Nextel uses "iDEN", a Motorola-designed technology which currently uses a time division, multiple access, air interface technology, but it's not related to IS-136 in any way (which is what people are normally refering to when they say "TDMA". I'm not sure if you meant that, but even if you didn't, I suspect others read that into your comment so I want to clarify)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re:Biggest in the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China Mobile

      North of 150M subs

    18. Re:Biggest in the... by Seanasy · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, China Mobile is the biggest in number of subscribers.

    19. Re:Biggest in the... by nbvb · · Score: 1

      No, you don't.

      CDMA is NOT a Canadian thing. It's a standard developed by Qualcomm (A US company) which has been adopted all over the place by various carriers.

      Sprint, Verizon Wireless, Alltel in the US ...
      It's huge in Japan and Korea;
      and yes, it is used in Canada, but it's not a "Canadian thing" as your message would imply.

    20. Re:Biggest in the... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      FWIW, industry gossip has them trying to pull out of Verizon Wireless, but waiting for the right opportunity. At one point it looked like they may buy AT&T, other rumours have them hitting on T-Mobile.

      The reason is that the partnership with Verizon has always been somewhat torturous. Originally, Vodafone bought a west coast mobile company that had partnered with Verizon (then Bell Atlantic) in a wireless venture called PrimeCo. Verizon threw a fit because they had wanted to run said mobile company. Worse, Verizon had decided they wanted CDMA for Bell Atlantic Mobile, as they'd done with PrimeCo, and Vodafone was very likely to want to convert the west coast operation to GSM. BAM immediately announced they wanted to close PrimeCo. PrimeCo was wound down, and at the last minute, Vodafone capitulated and offered to merge their US operations with Verizons into what then became Verizon Wireless.

      If that sounds a little obnoxious, well, it was, and Vodafone has really played second fiddle to Verizon throughout the "partnership". They have a share in a mobile company that doesn't do GSM, and uses the half-arsed US version of the IS-95 standard, which doesn't even support SIM cards (if it did, you might see dual standard GSM/CDMA phones.)

      So Vodafone wants out. They're waiting really for the opportunity. If T-Mobile sells the old Voicestream company (currently T-Mobile USA) they may take a bite at that, if the price is right.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    21. Re:Biggest in the... by Methuseus · · Score: 1

      The multiple phones I was talking about are a person has a cell phone for their own use, then the company gives them one so they can contact the employee but the employee can't use it for anything else, they maybe have a second phone for same company from a different department or diferent location, and then a pager that gets set off by remote admin software on a server.

      Keep in mind this is from a sysadmin standpoint. Also, this isn't the most common arrangement, but isn't exactly rare, either.

      And, yes, I know this is horribly redundant, but that's how a lot of US companies work, even today. It's stupid, but the US has always seemed to lag behind when it comes to new telecom advancements.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
  7. Re:1 + 1 = 0 by metlin · · Score: 1

    I use T-mobile, but I hate it just as much when I'm in the West Coast.

    Where I'm (Atlanta), T-mobile provides quite decent coverage. However, I've observed that when I'm in California T-mobile simply acts up. Horrible, horrible service.

    Wonder how Verizon is, though.

  8. I for one welcome by RealProgrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..oh, I just can't do it. My wife and I use Verizon. It costs too much. We can call each other for "free" -- as long as we pay $100/month, combined. The coverage is ok.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:I for one welcome by BobaFett · · Score: 1

      I pay $55 (with all taxes and fees) to AT&T for 450min shared between 2 lines (long-distance included) and unlimited mobile-to-mobile. T-mobile has even beter deal now, but didn't have it when I was shopping for plans. Plus I got two NEC-515's for a penny each. If with this merger I can get rollover of unused minutes on top of my plan, that'll be great.

    2. Re:I for one welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With this merger, your Mobile-To-Mobile minutes will let you call anyone on the old AT&T network, plus the new network.

      Rollover minutes require special software on the phones, so you may need to get new phones, or change to a similar rate plan that includes rollover.

      --Your friendly ATTWS Customer Care Specialist.

    3. Re:I for one welcome by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      rollover? To get that they'll probably make you sign a new contract. Hey, anything to keep you locked in right?

      For example, I know of a car dealership who would, after about 3-5 years (depending how their used car sales was doing) ask you to trade in your "old" car for a new one at "little or no out of pocket expense". The catch? So they could get you in a new lease/finance and keep you for another 3-5 years.

      PAY CASH if you can. It saves alot in finance charges.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    4. Re:I for one welcome by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      as long as we pay $100/month

      Plain local phone service used to be less than $20 a month, with the added bonus of being able to hear the other person during a call.

      It's a 400% price increase, but that's OK!! BRING ON THE MEGACORP!!

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    5. Re:I for one welcome by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      It still is about that price in some areas, if you don't get any special calling options. That means that unless you use prepaid calling cards you get to pay old fashioned long distance rates, like $.50 a minute. Consider what most people spent on local and long distance service years ago, it's probably about the same as they now pay for a cell phone with free long distance. That is called progress. In inflation adjusted dollars, telecom costs are lower than they've ever been. One difference is that people communicate a lot more than they used to, with friends, family and work obligations spread all across the country which is why some people's costs may have increased.

      Sorry to spoil a good anti-corporate rant here, but some things really do work out in favor of the consumer.

  9. Gains by FiReaNGeL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The rationale of this move, according to an analysis of the merger done by Businessweek at
    http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/oct200 4/nf20041026_3765_db016.htm

    "The Atlanta-based carrier has landed exclusive rights to the new Motorola Razr V3 and the Sony Ericsson se710a. Both are high-end multimedia phones expected to lure sophisticated buyers. The Motorola Razr is a design triumph. It's just a half-inch thick when closed. Open, it's as thin as a Q-Tip. Yet it manages to pack in a VGA camera with 4x zoom, 3D graphics capability, and 22 kilohertz polyphonic speaker technology."

    Its merger with AT&T Wireless will give Cingular 47.6 million subscribers, catapulting it past the 41 million customers that current market leader Verizon Wireless has. But that status might not last long unless Cingular can keep subscribers from bolting to Verizon and others. Cingular is plagued by above-average customer defections. [...] its churn rate edged up from 2.7% in the second quarter to 2.8% in the third, while Verizon's is hovering around a more wholesome 1.5%.

    Mergers are dangerous : you gain benefits (in this case, exclusive handhelds and a big subscriber base), but can go wrong. Only time will tell if the benefits outweighted the disadvantages in this case.

    1. Re:Gains by dala24 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thin as A Q-Tip?? How is that a good thing, i for one have come close to snapping my LG 5350 and that's a hefty little beast... Maybe from an engineering standpoint that Razr is a good thing, but for public useability, i'll go for utility and longevity over pure "cool factor"

      --
      There is no .sig
    2. Re:Gains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both are high-end multimedia phones expected to lure sophisticated buyers.

      Awww, come on. They couldn't get one asscrack to add a hype-hyphen? Something like "media-savvy buyers" or "power-hungry multimedia phones?"

      Journalism is really going downhill. Next thing you know, they'll learn to spell.

    3. Re:Gains by Media+Girl · · Score: 1
      I haven't seen any figures, but I have seen a lot of newfound rage against Verizon here and there of late. Their disabling of advertised features in a big-selling phone or two really ticked off a lot of customers. I considered switching to them, but their website is about as confusing as any cellular company's I've seen.

      Customer service can improve or worsten with a simple and quick change in management priorities. But if you're getting dropped calls, that's harder to fix ... unless a whole lotta people defect, thereby unburdening the overburdened, oversold cellular networks.

      AT&T's GSM service is appalling. How is Cingular's?

    4. Re:Gains by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Its merger with AT&T Wireless will give Cingular 47.6 million subscribers

      for which they only paid about $3500 PER SUBSCRIBER in the bidding war!! Yes, the decimal point is after the last zero.

      Cheap at half the price. I hope their orange "Jack" logo doesn't soon turn into red, bleeding from their bank accounts.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    5. Re:Gains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1.) 800/850MHz spectrum CANNOT BE BOUGHT thus is priceless...and cingular just got a big chunk in alot of places.

      2.) 1900MHz spectrum = 2 billion for 10 MHz in NYC alone.

      3.) Pre existing Network at 100K per cell site

      4.) 20 million plus customers.

      for 41 billion.....thats actualy not that bad.

  10. AT&T's idea of a network by Faustust · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I live in a regular brick house (NOT in the basement or with my mom). I get zero-to-no service at all here. I have to walk two blocks down the street to get 1 bar, 4 blocks for two bars, and 5 blocks for full service.

    My phone works fine everywhere else, but I swear AT&T hates me or my house. I've had them out to my house three times to check the signal and they always say it's fine. Maybe Cingular has a better network/customer service policy.

    1. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by vm · · Score: 1

      Two thoughts: 1) move out of your brick house or 2) upgrade to an 850MHz capable GSM phone or switch to a TDMA phone. You probably have an older GSM 1900MHz only device that has notoriously poor reception. 1.9GHz is in the microwave band and, like WiFi, Bluetooth, etc., does not travel as far as the PCS bands.

    2. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      3) when at home put your mobile phone in a wok or umbrella and use a headset.

      Images from here

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have to walk two blocks to the bar, that's not so bad.

    4. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by Poppa · · Score: 1

      Hopefully the suggestion to move to GSM will help. FWIW, Cingular and ATTWS have had an agreement to share cell towers for the last 6 months or so. I couldn't get ATTWS reception at my house; when the agreement went into force, my phone would switch to Cingular. (It was wierd seeing Cingular on my phone, especially as an ATTWS employee!)

    5. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by Ann+Elk · · Score: 1

      AT&T coverage sucks:

      • I'm now living in a small brick house in Fort Worth, TX, less than 100 yards from South Loop-820 -- poor coverage (the signal strength meter shows 1 or 2 bars out of 5).
      • At my friend's parent's house a couple of miles further south -- almost zero coverage (0 bars inside the house, 1 bar if I stand in the driveway).
      • At a favorite shopping center on University Drive north of TCU -- zero coverage (0 bars inside the shops, 0 or 1 outside).
      • At my previous house in Woodinville, WA (near Seattle) -- zero coverage (0 bars).
      • At my brother's house in Aledo, TX -- zero coverage (0 bars inside and outside).

      WTF?

    6. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by SenseiLeNoir · · Score: 1

      This is the one thing i NEVER understood about the US FCC, and its "protection" of American invented phone technologies.

      the problems you are having is somewhat due to this.

      When GSM was envisioned, there were two operating frequencies, 900Mhz, and 1800Mhz. 900Mhz had greater penetration and covered longer distances, whereas 1800Mhz provided slightly higher capacity in built up places (at the expense of range). Many countries use both bands effectively to minimise the requirements on transmitters and yet provide a good balence of range/capacity.

      ALL countries, except for the US and canada use a combination of those two frequencies, and a single Dual Band phoen will effectively provide a good service worldwide.

      When GSM was introduced in USA, the frequency given was 1900Mhz, which suffered from less distance, in a LARGE country, requiring far tooo many transmitters for the companies introducing the technology to introduce.

      Your problems seems to be caused by the choice of a 1900Mhz phone, which is why you are getting the errant signal strngth.

      I know that recently the FCC decided to allieviate the problem somewhat by introducing a Lower Frequency band (850Mhz). But again, WHY choose a FOURTH frequency, we already have a 900Mhz that works well throughout the world!

      Dont worry, the USA is not the only country with braindead policy in Cellphones, you can add the UK into the mix. Instead of adopting a policy of "900Mhz" in the countryside, and "1800" in built up areas, they allocated the frequencies based on the provider. So you have Vodaphone and O2 using 900Mhz, and T-Mobile and Orange using 1800Mhz.

      the problem with this policy is that in the countryside, where 900Mhz is more optimal, you have the 1800Mhz Operators putting up more transmitters to offset their shorter range and provide a good service. On the other hand, in built up areas, where 1800Mhz rules, you have the 900Mhz operators having to add more transmitters to increase their capacity.

      add to the mix that nobody "shares" transmitters, and you get a country that has far more transmitters than is needed, and wastage is high.

      --
      Have a nice day!
    7. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by Algan · · Score: 1

      But again, WHY choose a FOURTH frequency, we already have a 900Mhz that works well throughout the world!

      I think it's because in the US the 900Mhz band was allocated to cordless phones well before GSM came into play.

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    8. Re:AT&T's idea of a network by chris_morgan47 · · Score: 1

      i bought a brick house--near detroit--last year and had the same problem with at&t. ever since this merger began, whenever my phone is piciking up cingular, i get 2-3 bars in the basement.

  11. Re:1 + 1 = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate T-Mobile worst of all because of their insane prices on WiFi hotspots. Don't they know crap like that will drive people away from all their service, not just the one they rip people off of?

  12. Cingular indeed by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    I must cay, as an AT&T cuctomer, I feel ctrange today...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:Cingular indeed by lessthanjakejohn · · Score: 1

      Yeah ... Yesterday my phone switched over to "Cingular" from ATT and today it was "Cingular Wireless" I knew something was up, although I had thought they had already merged.

    2. Re:Cingular indeed by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      *runs over to check phone*
      Cinuglar! Darts! oh wait, i'm a cingular customer.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    3. Re:Cingular indeed by cgenman · · Score: 1

      A few months ago thanks to shoddy service and an annoying propensity to charge for everything possible under the sun (Including roaming in my home area, line setup fees when they shut off my phone due to their website frequently dropping payments, etc), I swore I would switch carriers.

      Well, that was convienient.

    4. Re:Cingular indeed by d-ude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My phone did that too for a few hours on 10/26. It eventually went back to it's normal AT&T Wireless though. Oh and my Ogo said it also when I checked it. I wonder why the switch, and then the switch back. I did call 611 for shits and it was the same IVR voice and menu stuff but it didn't pick up my phone number automatically...it asked me to key it in. I didn't go any farther than that.

  13. Pictures of the RZR by AIX-Hood · · Score: 1

    I came back from the recent digitallife show with pictures of said RZR: http://www.aixgaming.com/gallery/digital_life_2004 /aaz and I really loved it. I was saddened by the 30+ great looking Motorola phones however as they were all GSM and TDMA and none worked with my current Verizon service. Seeing as my co-worker's new Cingular phone is the only one out of the group's (Sprint/Verizon) phones to work in our basement datacenter, I may have to give them a try and pick up one of these snazzy models while I'm at it.

  14. If Bell and Telus merged would you call it Belus?

    --
    Call me and my voicemail! 914-713-6795. (wow, I have the balls to post my voip number on /.)
    1. Re:Hmm by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny

      If Bell and Telus merged would you call it Belus?

      who can Tell...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Hmm by Oylpann · · Score: 1

      I kind of liked the idea or AT&Tingular..

  15. I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is Cingular regarding bluetooth? AT&T? Do they pull a Sprint-Bitch(TM) or Verizon-Bitch(TM) and purposely cripple bluetooth? As a GSM network, I'm hoping they leave their phones' bluetooth virgin and pure so I can sync, use in new bluetooth enabled car, etc.

    The merger could mean I will, in New York City, be saturated with reception goodness. Each company on it's own was "ok to good" but overlap the two and Verizon IMO is shaking like the bluetooth criplin' bitch it is.

    *hopes and prays*

    1. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by atarione · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to be a dick... I actually **work** for the momment for verizon.... well until they read this.

      but verizon wireless assures you the bluetooth was "limited" for you saftey and convience =)

      you can go to our exciting pay portal to get your ring tones and transfer you photos.

      your shit out of luck with you car, and computer sync'ing however.

      Personally I was pretty appalled by their choice to cripple the V710 but hey they didn't ask me.

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    2. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by vm · · Score: 1

      Nobody says you have to buy your phone from the carrier. You're always welcome to purchase equipment from the manufacturer -- always have been, always will. FYI, Bluetooth is unmodified on AT&T, Cingular, and T-Mobile. Non-GSM carriers probably disable some functionality for a reason. Sprint has only disabled the laptop tethering feature on some of their devices. They must have technical or policy reasons for doing so. I advise you ask them for an explanation instead of merely whining about it.

    3. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Suffering+Bastard · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm a Cingular subscriber and I recently bought a Sony Ericsson T637, which is bluetooth enabled. I can sync it with my Mac and my bluetooth headset with no problem, as well as connect to other bluetooth phones. I'm not sure how Verizon cripples bluetooth, but from all outward appearances, Cingular does not cripple it all.

      --
      "Molest me not with this pocket calculator stuff."
      - Deep Thought
    4. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 1

      why on God's green earth would you need a bluetooth enabled car?

      --
      vodka, straight up, thank you!
    5. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by lessthanjakejohn · · Score: 1

      Hands free calling?

    6. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by js7a · · Score: 1

      Can you please file a trouble ticket with corporate or something saying that the crippled bluetooth is just plain stupid and whoever decided on it should be demoted?

    7. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually **work** for the momment for verizon.... well until they read this.

      Isn't it funny how everyone who works for a bloated office-politics-choked bureaucracy automatically predicts they will be fired if they speak?

      It's incredible the rights that are given away at the time clock.

    8. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      so I can drive the car with my phone! Whee! video games!

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    9. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that grand-parent has already applied for and gotten another job...right?
      Verizon: All your bluetooth base-station are belong to us! For great justice!

      Oh btw, BUSH SUX! Vote Kerry!

    10. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Because it is just the coolest use of Bluetooth ever.

      You get in the car, and now your Bluetooth-enabled phone is using your car's stereo speakers for audio out, and a dashboard mic for audio in. It mutes the stereo when an incoming call comes in, then sounds the ringer. You can configure it to autoanswer or answer when you press the dashboard "phone" button.

      If you press the phone button the stereo mutes itself and the phone goes into voice command dialing mode.

      The phone never leaves your pocket, and everything just "works" the way you would want it to. No fooling around with a headset that needs to be charged every night, and clipped to your ear like some cheapo Locutus-of-Borg wannabee.

      --
      John
    11. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Shag · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm now on my second Bluetooth phone from AT&T, and both have synced just fine with my Macs. I haven't tried using them in a Bluetooth-enabled car, but they're by no means limited to use with headsets, for example.

      This one's a Sony-Ericsson T616; its predecessor was a Nokia 3650, "world phone" but unfortunately AT&T "built out" their network in the rural areas around me using a different GSM frequency band than any of the ones supported by that tri-band phone. (It was 900/1800/1900MHz; they had 900MHz in town, but out of town deployed somewhere around 800-850Mhz. Wankers.)

      Here, Cingular is inheriting a pretty good network; FCC databases show that AT&T's tower count in this county is about double anyone else's. I think some of the others are trying to build out and catch up, so maybe in a few years I'll have other feasible options.

      --
      Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    12. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by mikrorechner · · Score: 1

      Someone, please educate me:

      Can't you in the US buy your cellphones anywhere else than your mobile service provider? Because here in Germany, I can get my phone together with a new contract from my provider, but if I don't like the phones they offer, I can also get a few bucks from them and buy my phone elsewhere.

      So tell me, why not buy your uncrippled bluetooth phone somewhere else and give a shit about Verizon's bluetooth policy?

      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    13. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is possible to buy your cellphones in the US from a place other than a mobile service provider, but the costs are very high and almost no Americans know it's possible. We have to pay full price for the phone, which is $200-300 usually for any phone that's not a toy. Mobile service providers give us the phones for free if we sign a 1 year contract, so most people do that. I did some research and I concluded that it made more sense for me to get my phone with a 1 year contract from T-Mobile than to buy the phone and then get mobile service.

    14. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by skreuzer · · Score: 1

      I have Cingular and a Sony Ericson T616 with full bluetooth support. I have used my phone to dial out on my palm, and I sync my contacts on my phone with my computer, and copy files to and from it (including games, ringtones and pictures)

    15. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by gmacek · · Score: 1

      At least with Cingular, they've never crippled any BT phones that I've purchased. Everything works as advertised here. Headsets, file transfer to/from a computer, you name it. You should have no problems here...

    16. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by RedX · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that in some cars (BMW for example), a Bluetooth phone can actually integrate with your car's on-screen phone book. For example, a user with a Bluetooth phone can hop in their BMW with iDrive, and their phone is now usable with steering wheel controls, audio over the sound system, and phone book entries accessible by the dash-mounted iDrive display.

    17. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      but hey they didn't ask me

      lol thanks for the laugh and the inside scopp. I appreciate it :)

    18. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1
      I just bought a 2005 Lexus RX 330 :)

      The 7 inch screen has DVD Nav and telephone functions, and the telephone uses bluetooth.

      So, all I do is get in the car, phone in pocket with no need to do anything else... and all calls can now be answered with the car's tough screen, and played over the cars speakerphone and use the VERY high quality noise cancelling mic. When a call comes in, both the music playing and GPS NAV announcments gently fade away to let me hear the ring. If I talk, it loweres the radio to a whisper and the NAV uses larger, non-sounding turn indicators. When the call ends the Radio and NAV sounds gently go back to the previous volume setting. When I leave the car, I need to do nothing and the calls go back to my phone as normal. All automatic.

      While I really like sthe car, I was still undecided util I saw this in the store demoed to me, and I then sat down to sign papers within 5 minutes and bought the car. Completely awesome. Since I am self employed and live and die by my phone to sell my own tech services, using 3000 minutes a month and over 30 phone calls a day just for biz, this bluetooth phone thing made me drool.

    19. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 1

      Gutentag!

      [ That's all the German I know, and you can thank the game Castle Wolfenstein for that one word :) ]

      Problem is the cost is $100's USD more, and a lot of the networks use their own frequencies etc. Verizon is not even GSM, but something called CDMA I think. One provider called Sprint is "PCS" and a few others are GSM but don't all use the same frequesncies. The market here is a mess, much like the rest of this country, where in Yurope :) you all have good GSM everywhere.

    20. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by FrankHaynes · · Score: 1

      Verizon is not stupid. They want you to run up your airtime minutes to talk.

      They do not want you to point your Bluetooth phone with its EV-DO service to your laptop, run a VoIP softphone, and talk using their unlimited Internet access, thereby bypassing their rate plan.

      So they lock you in to a few functions with Bluetooth.

      This kind of blew my whole business plan that I was thinking about right out of the water.

      --
      slashdot: A failed experiment.
    21. Re:I WANT IN.. but the bluetooth!?! by ohahmisua · · Score: 1

      because it's so convenient! once your car and cellphone are paired up, the car would recognize your phone even if it's all hte way in the trunk! when calls come in and show up on the screen, you can pick them up by simply pressing a button on the steering wheel~ then you just start talking like your phone's right next to you=) pretty awesome.

  16. Cingular already out to make $$$ by vlad_grigorescu · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "Q: Why do I need to get a new wireless phone when I want to get Cingular's current rate plans or services? A: Cingular's rate plans and services require unique software in your wireless phone to function properly. Unfortunately, AT&T Wireless phones are not equipped to support many of the benefits of Cingular's voice and data services. Therefore, to take advantage of the latest services Cingular offers, a new handset is required." Hmm... So Cingular has it's own OS running on the phone? Right... I would be more inclined to think that ATT has disabled several features of the phone (like #646#, which works on almost all other GSM networkds). I'm sure there's a way (probably easier than a ROM flash) to re-enable these. But Cingular refuses to do this... wonder why ($$$ ATT was kinda pricey). I wonder how long until there are sites up "Change your ATT F0ne to Cingular... Get Rollover Minutes!!" Hopefully this merger will clear up some issues I have been having while they were getting ready to merge. When I got my ATT phone, this July, I was told that if I saw Cingular on the screen, it was exactly the same as seeing ATT Wireless on the screen (after a $430 bill, I found out that this wasn't exactly the case) and that Cingular and ATT had started sharing towers. Only problem is that my ATT phone was programmed in a such a way not to choose the strongest signal, but to choose ATT first, and then if there was no signal on that, go to Cingular.

    1. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by Media+Girl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's double-talk. The problem is that AT&T phones have been locked into AT&T, so that you cannot take your phone to another carrier. That adds a barrier to switching and enforces loyalty. At least that's the theory. All the carriers do it.

      If I go GSM, I'm definitely going unlocked.

    2. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1

      Exactly the reason why you can't bring your phones over. They're locked for ATT. Though im told you can eBay up a device that will 'unlock' your phone (allowing you to use it anywhere), I've never gone out looking for one.

    3. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by txag98 · · Score: 1

      That's the reason I laugh at people who buy those PDA/phone combos. If they get tired of their current provider, they can not use their phone at a different provider. Thus their PDA/phone is useless. Number portability was great, but now we need phone portability. Though I doubt that will happen anytime soon.

    4. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by Scott · · Score: 1

      I thought about going the unlocked route, mostly to get a Z200 (hooray clamshell without stubby antenna) and dump my shitty 8265. However the burning hate caused by carrying a cell really won't let me justify spending a few hundred bucks on such a thing. There is such a big price difference between unlocked and carrier-discounted phones that it just ends up being cheaper to let the new carrier basically buy your new phone for you if you need to switch.

      Maybe the only US-bound phone I'd consider buying unlocked to keep long term would be the Razr. At $700 though that isn't too likely to happen.

    5. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's several services out there on the web, and ebay, that for a small fee and some info from your phone, tell you how to unlock it. Someone posted a link to slashdot once to site that would do it for free. So it's not impossible to get an unlocking code and take your hardware to another network.

    6. Re:Cingular already out to make $$$ by txag98 · · Score: 1

      But will said provider support a phone which has been "unlocked" By support I mean give the phone access to their network if I sign up for one of their plans. I understand some phone may not be compatible, technology wise, but if they are then there should be no excuse. For example, when I went from Brand X telephone carrier to SWB (yea I know bad idea) I did not have to buy new phones for my house.

  17. the same by timothy · · Score: 1

    In Seattle, 1 bar sometimes, occasionally as many as three bars (celebration time!) in the house I share there, then ... zero. Even in the same spot in the house; conversations longer than 5 minutes there are pretty rare without at least one dropped connection.

    In primary residence of El Paso, much better. Now, El Paso may be flatter and therefore easier to cover, but I'd hate to be a national cell carrier with awful coverage in Seattle! Sure, there are hills and rain and trees -- BUILD MORE TOWERS, because there are also lots of young urbanites with cell phones.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  18. Clarification Please by Coocha · · Score: 1

    I don't have the time or energy to RTFA (8am class tomorrow) but I assume that only AT&T's wireless subsidiary was purchased.

    That said, I must admit my interest is speculative only. I don't own a mobile phone, nor do I plan to until I need it as a matter of profession. You wouldn't believe how many people walk mindlessly around campus, oblivious to the Real World(tm) because they're so engaged in the cellphone conversations. Makes me sick, especially since as a bicyclist, these normally sober and aware individuals turn into slalom cones.

    Sleepy rant complete. 'Night all.

    --
    May the threads progress competently.
    1. Re:Clarification Please by vm · · Score: 2, Informative

      AT&T Wireless split from AT&T Corp back in the summer of 2001.

  19. Re:moderators are the real cowards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    4,3,2...1 ...until you get modded offtopic.

    ~m

  20. Does this mean I'm no longer roaming on AT&T? by Osty · · Score: 1

    I'm on Cingular, and I have good signal strength everywhere but at work. At work, I can pick up AT&T Wireless just fine (must have a repeater in the building or something, because it's very strong, and no other cell network shows up). Does this mean that I can now use the AT&T network without worrying about roaming charges? Maybe I can finally answer my cell at work, rather than waiting for it to ring through to my work phone! (it takes 5+ rings before it forwards, after which most people will hang up.)

  21. AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by cswiii · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife (boy, it feels strange to say that) is from Canada, and before we got married, I used to call up there all the time. I recently renewed my contract w/ ATTWS, because as recently as Sept., ATTWS was the only mobile provider I could find that offered a plan allowing the user toll-free calling to .ca and no roaming while there, either. I didn't want to renew after the merger, and risk not having that option available to me.

    It used to be an extra $20 a month, then when I switched to GSM, they'd lowered it to $10. Now I think it's only like $7/mo, which is a real bargain. I think it's called their "North America" plan or something, now.

    Just a heads up for those who might find such a service useful. I've been asking for a few months now at both ATTWS and Cingular stores whether the new company would offer a similar plan, but no one knew for sure.

    1. Re:AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1

      I have the misfortune of actually working for ATT Wireless customer service. You are correct, the North American package is 6.99. I wish I didn't know that by heart.

    2. Re:AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by plover · · Score: 1
      Dude, I really pity you. (Unless you had anything to do with designing, developing or maintaining their customer service application, at which point I utterly loathe you...)

      Having to work for a company that incredibly short-sighted, stupid and ignorant of their customers must truly make you hate your job. I hope Cingular treats you better, or at least insults your intelligence less. Good luck with the merger.

      --
      John
    3. Re:AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by Skadet · · Score: 1

      toll-free calling to .ca and no roaming

      Only a geek would refer to the physical location of Canada as ".ca". Well done.

    4. Re:AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1
      I don't mind working customer service. What I DO mind is having to fix errors that someone else in the company spawned. As well, the staggering lack of information they give to us representatives about "How things work" would surprise you.

      My pet peeve is having a customer call me up and know more than me about what promotions are currently going on, or quoting me a price for a phone from someplace, and have MY system read differently. I guess, as reps, we're supposed to 'wing it'.

      The lack of information we have as far as what's "going on" is indeed the single reason why hold times are so high. What do you think we're doing when we put you on hold? Frantically pulling up the attwireless website to find out exactly what you saw or searching through our policies to see if what you're telling us is actually allowed. And should we fail to find that information, we have to pull over a supervisor to be sure we CAN match the price you saw.

      Also, while on the topic of hold times, if you ever have to call up to troubleshoot your phone from now on, our new "tool" (not disclosed due to NDA) takes about 3 times as long to load, and 5 times as long to get the required information out of.

    5. Re:AT&T Wireless and Canada calling by ratsnapple+tea · · Score: 1

      This is offtopic, but if you have the time, I'm hoping you can answer a nagging question I've had...

      I live in Manhattan, and someone I know moved here earlier this year and got a 212 area code on her new cell phone. Apparently, there were a number of prefixes freed up recently for cell phone use. My question is, is there some way I can change my number to a 212 area code? I've called to ask before, but there haven't been any numbers free for the taking. Do I just have to wait?

      Posting anonymously because I'm embarrassed to admit I care about my area code. 212 is cool.

  22. Ma Bell on the comeback by JeffTL · · Score: 1

    Cingular confirms it, competition is dying :)

    Bear in mind that this is an SBC (i.e. Southwestern Bell) and BellSouth joint venture buying a former subsidiary of AT&T.

    Also bear in mind that the RBOCs have been whittled down by merger to those two, Verizon, and Qwest. How much longer until this becoimes three, or two, or even one, if the feds think that the cell phone companies are the "competition"?

    1. Re:Ma Bell on the comeback by vm · · Score: 1

      General Telephone was never a Regional Bell Operating Company. Check your telephone history.

    2. Re:Ma Bell on the comeback by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you were never an AT&T customer. We use them at work and their customer service is awful. Read the post about the guy with the phone problem to see what I mean. AT&T also has done nasty tricks like selling crippled tri-band GSM phones that are actually only dual-band phones. I bought a refurbished Nokia 3650 through Amazon.com's reseller option (people can sell used stuff this way) and I was appalled to discover that the 1800 band was missing from what was supposed to be a tri-band phone. The phone I bought was AT&T branded. I got a refund, but I was not impressed that a tri-band phone was deliberately crippled so that one of the international bands didn't work. I travel internationally from time to time and it's important to me to have a phone that works when I'm not in the USA.

      Frankly, I think there are too many cell phone providers in the US. AT&T was, hands down, the worst of them all and nothing but good can come of this for the consumer. As a GSM phone customer of T-Mobile, anything that strengthens GSM in the USA is good for me (T-Mobile and Cingular roam on each other's networks, which gives their customers coast to coast service).

    3. Re:Ma Bell on the comeback by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      Actually, I am an AT&T Wireless customer (got in because I always liked AT&T long distance), and I have some coverage issues, but their antenna is on my college campus so I never have a problem at school...though my handset is no good so I am as likely as not to just use a land line for anything of value.

  23. as Lando would say by Emugamer · · Score: 1

    That blast came from the Death Star! That thing's operational!

  24. Nothing's changin by Southpaw018 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Cingular and AT&T customers can see what is/isn't changing for them at newcingular.com" It looks like for both services, nothing at all will change except a new name on the AT&T bills (the AT&T customers will get a change if they switch their calling plans). As an ardent cell phone geek, I've spent time with both companies - two years with AT&T, and now going on one with Cingular. Both companies were pretty much the same. Same service (great), same wonderfully geek-satisfying equipment (as opposed to Verizon with some really cheap crappy stuff, wholly absent of Nokia and Sony Ericsson), and almost same plans and prices. Very minor differences even there. The newcingular site claims that the end user will literally sense no change. If that's true, I'm staying with Cingular for a long, long, looooooong time. They already rock.

    --
    ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    1. Re:Nothing's changin by Mr.+Fusion · · Score: 2, Informative
      It also mentions that Rollover minutes will be made available to current AT&T customers:
      • Plans are already underway to make Rollover Minutes available to you. Please check back on November 10, 2004 for an update. Our goal is to have this feature available to you by this holiday season.
    2. Re:Nothing's changin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the desk of an AWS employee:

      Well, I am working at AWS right now, and from what I have been told, the changeover should be entirely smooth. I have also heard the same thing that the website says, that the promotions and features from each company will be available to customers of each company come mid november. This is a huge plus to both sides of the faction.

  25. What's Frustrating for Me by johnnyb · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's frustrating for me is that a few weeks before they first announced this, I, having been COMPLETELY FED UP with Cingular and their terrible, possibly unethical billing practices, I decided to drop them mid-contract and signed up w/ AT&T.

    I just can't win.

    1. Re:What's Frustrating for Me by hatefulmofo · · Score: 2, Informative

      ATT Wireless was never much better a company anyway. They're both morally bankrupt companies. I work customer service for ATT Wireless, and for the last 6 months, ATTWS management have been saying nothing but 'renew every single contract you possibly can', customer service be damned.

    2. Re:What's Frustrating for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would you mind elaborating on your billing experience?

    3. Re:What's Frustrating for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      amen brother - another AWS employee.

    4. Re:What's Frustrating for Me by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      What's frustrating for *me* is that I ditched Cingular over outrageous billing issues, and moved to SunComm/AT&T. So now I guess I move over to Alltel, as I have a very strict policy: if a company screws me, I will give them a second chance; if they screw me again, I will go to my grave without ever giving them another penny, no matter what it costs me in the long run.

      At least I won't have to deal with the anguish of number portability taking effect two months after I finally ditched Cingular.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    5. Re:What's Frustrating for Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sympathize. I experienced the same thing with AT&T a few years ago. I opted not to locate their call-center and start sniping employees. Instead, I signed up with Worldcom, based on a flyer in the USMail change of address packet. A few months later, they announced their cellular service was being sold off to... AT&T Wireless... Oh joy. But besides one seriously aggrevating situation, for the past 4+ years that I've been on AT&T I've been pretty happy, althought I have experienced quite a few dropped calls in the last few months.

  26. What does AT&T do anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny


    They sold off their long distance service, then their cable and local phone service, now their wireless. Do they still do anything?

    1. Re:What does AT&T do anymore? by vm · · Score: 1

      Local loop and long distance, voice over IP (currently in a price war with Vonage), and some silly thing called the Internet.

    2. Re:What does AT&T do anymore? by cubicledrone · · Score: 1

      Nothing. They're exactly like Disney, which claimed it couldn't make money on Monday Night Football but still spent millions to make "Lion King 1 1/2"

      --
      Business isn't willing to pay for products, innovation and careers, so we get brands, mortgage commercials and layoffs.
    3. Re:What does AT&T do anymore? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Yeah, its called selling and leasing lines. Since they OWN the whole network almost, they just sit back and collect the money.

      If you rent an apartment, just think of your landlord owning the internet.

      --
      I don't get it.
  27. Doh! by igzat · · Score: 1

    I switched over from AT&T to Verizon about 6 months ago, just before the merger was announced. Back then AT&T service was horrible here in NJ, I constantly had low signal and dropped calles. This merger should make Cingular the largerst cellular phone provider, but I'll have to wait and see if the service gets any better. I have Verizon now and love the service, but the prices are highway robbery. If Cingular can offer the same service as AT&T at a lower price, I see a lot of people switching over.

  28. Great! by jedaustin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the largest and crappiest network ever!

    I'd be rich if I had a nickel every time someone asked me to call them on a real phone when I was using my ATTWS cell phone.. 'You sound like you're in a tin can!'.

    Lets hope Cingular can bring something better to their service.

    1. Re:Great! by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1

      That's not really the fault of ATTWS, so much as it is the way cellular technology is going. GSM crams even more bandwidth saving techniques into the line than the digital service did. Between compression, the 'time slicing', and the cheap ass phones (Primarily the low end LG phones) ATTWS sells, you'd get better sound tying two tin cans together with string.

    2. Re:Great! by WiseWeasel · · Score: 1

      FYI, I just switched from AT&T's TDMA network and a crappy Nokia phone to their GSM network with a Sony-Ericsson T637. With the old phone and service, I had the same problem, and quality was terrible. With the new one, the quality is DRAMATICALLY improved, almost to the level of a landline phone. Reception and service is also wonderful now. I tried AT&T's GSM service about a year and a half ago, and it was totally useless, with incredibly poor service; but it seems that since then, they have greatly improved their coverage. I have nothing but good things to say about this phone and service, and their GSM plans are even cheaper than the TDMA one I was on, so I'm a happy camper. If you're still stuck on the TDMA network, or with a crappy phone, I'd suggest upgrading, as it will really make a difference.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
    3. Re:Great! by jedaustin · · Score: 1

      They played the 'you need to switch phones game' with me too.. had absolutely NO EFFECT other than I was now stuck in a new 2 year contract and LESS features (I lost 'pocketnet' since I was on a different 'network'.. but I could pay $10 a month to get the same thing of course).

      I called customer support to drop my minutes and complain about their crappy service.. they didn't even appologize; instead they tried to force me into a new contract because I wanted to drop to a plan with less minutes.

      Two months later I was still fighting with them to fix my bill. They applied the plan retroactively instead of at the beginning of the next month (I called them on the 20th) and since I didn't start a new contract long distance was now NOT INCLUDED (even though the plan I switched to included it; they said it was a perk for the contract). Canceling their service was almost as difficult as cancelling AOL, they wouldn't take 'DISCONNECT ME' for an answer! At that point all the free minutes in the world couldn't convince me to stay.

      I ended up dropping their service and going to Alltel. WHAT A DIFFERENCE! Simular model phone (looks the same but the model number is different) but the audio quality is perfect.

      My only beef with Alltel (and I doubt I could escape this with any provider) is all the bullshit charges that are tacked on that weren't disclosed when I signed up. All the taxes, fees, and extra charges end up costing an extra $20 between the two phones on the plan.
      I asked when I signed up.. they couldn't tell me ahead of time what these charges would be (I live in AZ btw):

      911 SERVICE $ 0.37
      FEDERAL USF $ 1.27
      REG COST RCVRY FEE $ 0.56
      TELCOM CNCTVTY FEE $ 0.59
      911 SERVICE $ 0.37
      FEDERAL USF $ 0.70
      REG COST RCVRY FEE $ 0.56
      TELCOM CNCTVTY FEE $ 0.59
      Subtotal: $ 5.01
      I understand the 911 fee.. but what are the other charges?

      Taxes (I added the %'s):

      Federal Taxes $ 1.44 (2.2%)
      State Taxes $ 2.65 (4.02%)
      County Taxes $ 0.48 (0.74%)
      Local Taxes $ 1.52 (2.34%)
      Total Taxes, Fees
      and Surcharges $ 6.09 (extra 9.3%)

      Then theres the $4 per phone per month for 'equipment insurance' (another $8).
      $20 to have the extra phone on the account (same minutes) which seems reasonable.

      So after taxes, fees, and insurance my $45.00 plan actually costs me $65.

      JD

  29. *-!!%%$#@ Bastards! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... and Cingular and AT&T customers can see what is/isn't changing for them at newcingular.com."

    The ONLY thing I'm concerned about here is getting the unlock codes to my Nokia 3360. I asked of course, and their answer was no. I've already had my year of service, and now I have a paperweight I can't use, even on those "pay as you go" plans.

    I have more freedom with a regular phone.

  30. Re:1 + 1 = 0 by over_exposed · · Score: 1

    I live in chicago and I despise me Cingular service. When I'm driving home at 6:30pm on Lake Shore Drive and calling someone (don't lecture me about driving while talking, traffic was crawling), and I havea FULL signal bar, I still drop calls. When I called support they said this:
    "Well sir, the network is increidbly busy so you're gong to lose calls like that. Try you call later."
    My signal fades from full to nothing at different parts of my apartment. I'm on the 18th (top) floor of an apartment complet just north of down town and I still have to walk around in my place hoping to find a decent signal.

    --
    "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
  31. Predictable by ICECommander · · Score: 0, Troll

    I for one welcome our new cellular overlords.

    --
    All your Sybase are belong to us.
  32. Can you say....Countersue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I was talking of the phenomenon of large-mergers, which could be stiffling to smaller companies simply because all it would take is a bunch of lawsuits to kill innovation. We already see it happening."

    And what lawsuits could a big company institute that wouldn't come back and bite them?

    1. Re:Can you say....Countersue. by metlin · · Score: 1

      Lawsuits where a small company would rather give in than fight.

      When IBM sues you and sends in a bunch of their very best lawyers, you seldom fight. You or your investors would seldom dare risk open confrontation - they next move would be to move into the boardroom and negotiate.

      What did the anti-trust things do to Microsoft? Effectively NOTHING. It killed off Netscape.

      Lawyers are expensive, and so are court-room fees. Do you really think that small companies could stand a chance against companies whose policies are defeatist by nature, with a few billion dollars in the bank?

    2. Re:Can you say....Countersue. by Slack3r78 · · Score: 1

      How about the case where Creative sued Aureal into oblivion? Even if they're wrong, it still costs money to fight these things in court.

  33. Singular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How much longer until Cingular is Singular?

  34. Explains the Worried Looks... by trogdor8667 · · Score: 1

    I had been wondering why all the AT&T Wireless employees in my mall were looking scared. This probably means a lot of AT&T stores will be closing.

  35. .ca? wtf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ATTWS was the only mobile provider I could find that offered a plan allowing the user toll-free calling to .ca and no roaming while there, either

    Hahaha, how fucking geeky are we when we refer to other countries by their domain?!? .ca? HAHA, fucking dork! Nice :)

  36. The biggest change so far by fluxrad · · Score: 1

    for about half of you...unlock your phone. look at it. notice anything different?

    /that was quick.

    --
    "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -David Hume
  37. I know reading the article is bad form... by philovivero · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but I couldn't help it. I went to the website and clicked the "I'm an AT&T customer" (I recently left Cingular for AT&T).

    They had a list of bullet points and then a whole page devoted to how much better my life is going to be after this merger. I swear, there were about 64 kilobytes of text devoted to listing all the positives of this merger.

    That's when it struck me that companies really need to read the Cluetrain Manifesto. I really would be interested in the six worst things that are going to happen to me, so that I can be prepared for it.

    Take, for example, when I first signed up with AT&T. Plan: $65/month all told. First bill comes. $300. WTF? Everything that could go wrong, did. They put me on the wrong plans. They didn't count my mobile-to-mobile minutes. They signed me up for about 17 extra plans I didn't need or ask for. Not to mention that "Federal fund recovery fee" which is essentially AT&T's way of saying "How come restaurants get to charge you 15% extra for tips, and we don't??? Oh, wait. We do. We'll just charge a tip on every bill. Nice."

    Now Cingular is going to take this bumblefuck of a corporation and incorporate it into its everyday operations.

    And things are going to go smoothly? I don't think so.

    This is Tweedle-dee meets Tweedle-dum, and they're in charge of your critical wireless communications. Be prepared to be pissed off.

    1. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wait a second here. I know that there have been "phantoms" in the system that screw up the orders and what not for customers, but if it is an AT&T error, we will credit you back and fix it up. As for that "Federal fund recovery fee" you mean the "Regulatory Programs fee". IT IS NOT AT&TS WAY OF SAYING THAT THEY JUST WANT FREE MONEY!

      The Regulatory Programs Fee(RPF) is a fee that AT&T places upon its customers to zero out a government compliance. The government charges wireless companies a fee to use government run programs, essentially a governmental tax. AT&T would lose billions per year if they did not levy this fee to the customers at the cost of 1.75$ per month. And it isnt just AT&T wireless. Its part of every wireless company. Check your friends verizion, t-mobile, or sprint bill. there will be a similar charge on it.

      -AWS employee

    2. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fee is actually called the "Regulatory Programs Fee". It's listed plainly on your Terms of Service, which -- if you had read -- you would know about. It's there to cover the various public-service programs the federal government requires AT&T to provide.

      -- An anonymous AT&T Customer Care agent, who is sick of dealing with retards like yourself. Read your fucking Terms of Service, THEN come bitch to us.

    3. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real scam is the "number portability fee". The FCC gave carriers the green light to charge a fee to pay for number portability -- but they aren't required to do so.

      Verizon, for example, claimed that it cost approx. 15 cents a month to implement portability. But, they charge 45 cents...

    4. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by Gailin · · Score: 1

      I rue the day I switched to ATTW. I was a very happy T-mobile customer for years, but unfortunately their service is not up to par in my new neighborhood. So I switched to ATTW wireless in Feb of last year.

      I am one of those people that really likes auto-pay, and in the years I was with T-Mobile, I never once had a problem with a late bill. Unfortunately it seems that ATTW is incapable of processing my forms for auto-bill properly. I have sent in the forms 4 times, literally, the last time certified, yet they still havent managed to extricate their head from their ass. When my bill was late, because I incorrectly assumed they had processed my form (my mistake I know), they called me on my cell with an automated recording, indicating that someone would be on the line soon. Well as it turns out, they CALLED ME and PUT ME ON HOLD for 10 minutes. What kind of crap is that.

      Needless to say a month ago I paid the 175(0) for each of my lines so that I could stop doing business with that horrid company.

      Its kind of sad when people will actually pay money just to NOT do business with you.

      Gailin

      --
      I wish there was a fscking blue pill
    5. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1
      Google up REGULATORY PROGRAMS FEE and you'll see every wireless carrier charges it AS REQUIRED BY FEDERAL LAW.

      Though looking at how much T Mobile charges for it, I wont discount your 'taking a tip' theory. ATTWS charges 1.75 for the Programs Fee, Tmobile charges 86 cents.

    6. Re:I know reading the article is bad form... by AK+Marc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IT IS NOT AT&TS WAY OF SAYING THAT THEY JUST WANT FREE MONEY!

      It most certainly is. Sure the costs are real. WalMart doesn't have $6.65 on the box, only to charge you storage fees, parking fees, retail overhead, "government regulation fees" (they pay money directly to Social Security and other fees directly to governemnts). They figure out the cost, advertise $9.88, charge $9.88 (plus tax, if you are in a taxed location) and pay all the fees without bugging you.

      If I were in charge of the FCC (too bad I'm not a general's son), I'd order that all telecom companies include all static (either in $ or %) fees in the advertised price. They shouldn't be allowed to tell you service is $20, then charge you $40 because of all the fees they add in that they blame on the government. It is their cost of business, and the only reason they are separating them out is to be able to advertise or quote lower rates that they are not able to deliver.

  38. Dodging bullets by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    Some time back, I was with Cingular, but I decided their service sucked hardcore and wanted to go with someone else. I decided that AT&T had the best rates and the right coverage area, plus my downstairs neighbor got great reception with his phone. After they screwed up my online order three - count 'em - three times, I decided to cancel my order(s) and go with Sprint. About two days later, the first news reports hit the wire about Cingular buying out AT&T Wireless. Glad I dodged that bullet.

    What's even funnier is that now, months later, I still get bills in the mail for $0.00 from AT&T Wireless.

    1. Re:Dodging bullets by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      "Why do they call him the Bullet Dodger?"
      "'Cause he dodges bullets, Avi!"

  39. SIM only, voice + data, GSM, no contract? by sandgroper · · Score: 1

    I'll be visiting the U.S. soon for 6 weeks or so, and want a cheap(?) connection with national roaming (no phone needed) along the lines listed above.

    Both Cingular's and ATT's (old) websites are un-navigable when looking for something this specialized, in my book.

    Any recomendations of deals from /.-ers?

    1. Re:SIM only, voice + data, GSM, no contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strap on a bomb and blow yourself up at the nearest cellphone company headquarters? Seriously though, U.S. cellphone companies are the worst.. terrible service, horrible ethics. They make budding Osama Bin Ladens want to crash planes into buildings.

    2. Re:SIM only, voice + data, GSM, no contract? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      T-mobile has a pretty good deal for $20/mo unlimited GPRS data service. I pay $60/mo total for 500 minutes inside the US, national roaming, and unlimited GPRS. If you ask specifically, you should be able to get it without a contract (ask for a manager if they give you hell).

      If they still don't budge, call the customer service number and ask for it. Sometimes the store people are a bit clueless.

    3. Re:SIM only, voice + data, GSM, no contract? by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

      I'll be visiting the U.S. soon for 6 weeks or so, and want a cheap(?) connection with national roaming (no phone needed) along the lines listed above.

      From what I've read up at most US wireless websites , you don't have an option - you HAVE to buy a phone with the plan. They don't allow you to just pop in a pre-paid SIM card, like they do in the uncivilised, savage and barbaric Rest-Of-The-GSM-World. But then this could just be my lack of R & D. Does anybody else know of any service plan in which you can use a mobile bought outside America (but Tri-Band equipped, of course)..?

    4. Re:SIM only, voice + data, GSM, no contract? by vm · · Score: 1

      Try prepaid, data rates are 1c/kb on top of other charges. Click on rate options here: http://attwireless.com/gophone

  40. AT&T Wireless will re-emerge in the next 6-12 by ApheX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its worth mentioning that AT&T still owns the rights to the AT&T Wireless name and will re-emerge in the near future as AT&T Wireless but basically reselling Sprint's service.

    Ah! The confusion!

    --

    -
    aphex
    I Steal Music!
  41. VOTE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much longer until this becoimes three, or two, or even one, if the feds think that the cell phone companies are the "competition"?

    If you are a voter in the USA and can slip, Mario-like, though the Jim Crow upgrade surrounding your poll then next Tuesday is your big chance to do something about it. Let no (R) remain! Sinclair felt it here, the monopobrands are feeling it abroad, now let's bring it to the representatives.

  42. Pull over to talk on the phone by tepples · · Score: 1

    Hands free calling?

    They make headsets for that. Besides, shouldn't you just pull over anyway, for your safety and that of those around you?

    1. Re:Pull over to talk on the phone by David_W · · Score: 1
      Hands free calling?
      They make headsets for that. Besides, shouldn't you just pull over anyway, for your safety and that of those around you?

      That's assuming you want to use a headset... I find the handsfree adapter in my car much more convenient since I don't have to fumble with putting on a headset when the phone rings, or leave the darn thing on during my entire trip.

      As for pulling over, I've never understood the logic behind this idea. If (and only if) you have a handsfree setup (bonus points if it is coupled with voice dialing), how is talking on your cell any different than talking to a passenger in the car? You don't pull over in the latter instance, so why would you in the former?

    2. Re:Pull over to talk on the phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small difference: Passengers in the car can see what you're driving through -- if it's tight, dangerous, etc they can stop talking for a minute. Somebody on the phone is oblivious and will just keep talking.

  43. Ported by Ranger · · Score: 1

    I had no problems with AT&T Wireless. I did, however, have a big problem with Crapular, er ah Cingular, and refused to become one of their customers. I ported my number to SprintPCS. I know they have the 2nd worst customer service, but they had what I needed, and I know how to work their call center system. Alas, Verizon doesn't service my state so I couldn't pick them. It's interesting that Verizon used to be GTE, perhaps the worst telephone company to have ever existed. But they merged with Nynex and apparently have a good reputation now. Well, US Worst, er US West, er no now Qwest had the most horror stories that I heard for a landline phone company and Cingular the worst for a cell phone company.

    To paraphrase George Orwell's Animal Farm: "All phone companies are evil. Some are more evil than others."

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  44. Please finish changeover by Oct 31! by lothar97 · · Score: 1
    I've had the same wireless number since 1998 (GTE, bought by AT&T, now Cingular). I've been in the same San Diego neighborhood for the past 2 years. Each time the time changes (spring and fall), while in my apartment, I get stuck between battling cell phone towers- one with the incorrect time. My phone will autoupdate the time every 5 minutes or so. This goes on for around a month. I have to check the phone's time before making a call, because it's possible to make a call at 7:30 (night minutes) and the phone thinkgs it's 6:30 (day minutes) Let's just say that calling this problem into tech support does not get me anywhere (they're always amazed that someone notices this problem.)

    I really hope this changeover occurs before Oct 31, because I don't want the battling towers again.

    --

    1. Re:Please finish changeover by Oct 31! by Robocrap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Turn off autoupdate and set it manually to the correct time.

    2. Re:Please finish changeover by Oct 31! by jormurgandr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're not billed by what time the phone thinks it is, but buy by what time the telco computer says it is.

  45. Re:Excellent! by igrp · · Score: 1
    There will be a catered presentation on the new management bonuses, buyouts, reserved parking, options and 300% salary increases by a blow-dried, phone flipping asshole in the conference room.

    *Lumbergh voice* What's haaaaaaaaappening, Peter?

  46. Couldn't happen soon enough! by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I, for one, welcome our new Cingular overlords.

    My advice to Cingular on this buyout (if they'd have it?) Completely stomp all AT&T customer-facing EVERYTHING into irretrievable dust, and replace it with Cingular everything. Every drop of software, to the point of formatting any hard drive infested with any AT&T software or marketing. Drop every stupid, confusing plan, and replace it with an equivalent Cingular plan. Burn every marketing brochure, and hang on to the resumes of any former AT&T marketing executive just to ensure they're prominently featured front and center on your blacklist. "Unwanted" posters might not be going too far.

    I have had the CRAPPIEST CUSTOMER SERVICE EVER from AT&T Wireless. Bar none. I have gotten more useful, helpful, timely and factual information from a WalMart greeter. I can't blame the poor salescreature who I bought my phones from. It's their process that is the most horrendous piece of crap application ever devised by a bunch of marketing VPs. I tell you if any coworker of mine were to emit an application as unfriendly as that they'd be gone in a heartbeat, maybe less. This poor lady had to spend 25 minutes PER PHONE to enter a half page of customer information. Tough stuff, like name, address AND ZIP code. To do that, she had to click through literally dozens of pages of options she couldn't explain to me; she misunderstood (and misguided me) about their confusing plethora of plans, and to top it all off, she was one of two people in the store.

    As it was, I waited over an hour just to get to her, then other people had to wait over 90 minutes before my transaction was completed. The reason I don't blame her is when she called the 1-800-DUH number to answer my questions, they couldn't help her either! And she's worked in the store for well over a year. How hard can it be to sell a goddamn phone??? "Push these buttons, pay this amount." God, I'm still burning over that waste of my life.

    As far as customer service on their help lines? I don't think so -- I waited over three hours on hold one night to try to get them to fix the plan the saleslady eventually misclicked. If I wasn't locked in an old contract, I'd have dropped them for T-Mobile in a heartbeat. As it was, after all the headaches were added up it seriously would have been worth my time to pay the $174 they would have charged me for an early switch.

    Technically, I've had very good luck with AT&T. I'd had steadily improving coverage with my PCS phone for the last three years, so I've no complaints with their network. That is, until I got sucked into their GSM plan ("mMode"). My coverage is now a tiny, tiny area immediately surrounding Minneapolis/St. Paul, although even that's been improving over the last four months. Now, if Cingular just has a decent GPRS plan ... well, a fellow can dream, can't he?

    Anyway, when this AT&T contract is up it's "Hello T-Mobile!" and "good riddance to bad rubbish, AT&T Wireless." That is, if Cingular doesn't improve the situation considerably.

    --
    John
    1. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Haha, yeah. I used to work customer service for AT&T Wireless, it really was awful. I thought the billing system we used for TDMA was terrible, then I got switched over to the GSM department and it was just the worst abomination ever. Once in GSM I longed for the relative simplicity of the TDMA billing system. Ugh, don't remind me.

    2. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by kcb93x · · Score: 1

      I've got an AT&T GSM phone as well, in the MSP/St. Paul area - coverage is decent, in the cities. don't go north though, up here around Anoka it drops off. Hwy 65 is HORRIBLE. Oh, and go look at Cingular's service area - they don't even service ANYONE in Minnesota. Yeah. That's why I didn't look at them when I ended up picking AT&T. YET - Cingular has been advertising in our state for the last few years. AND THEY DON'T EVEN FREAKING OFFER ANY SERVICE IN THE STATE!

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      A fellow sufferer, huh? I worked over in ICC/PNet back in 2000 while they were shutting the program down. If you think TDMA/GSM was bad, bundled billing was a complete and utter nightmare since if something got 'stuck', you couldn't touch it at all on either the wireless or regular phone sides.

      I'm guessing the level of service went WAY down after I left, though-- I and many of the other people on my team didn't run into a whole lot of really angry customers over wireless issues (but we sure did on the regular long distance...)

    4. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by jcostantino · · Score: 1
      I won't even get into details with my experience but ATTWS sold me an Ericsson T68i and it WOULD NOT get signal. I had to pay out of pocket for a different GSM phone off of ebay because AT&T's service down here (South Florida) sucked. After three replacements, I sold the 3rd as new on Ebay to recover some of my loss and struggled through my 1 year contract.

      I really liked the form factor of the T68i but ATTWS's network was such shit that I would average 5 tries to get connected and i might not be able to stay connected. It improved hugely when I bought a used Motorola T720 but I had my fill of ATTWS and made an early switch to Cingular - who offers excellent service, good prices and I NEVEr have a dropped call

      I ended up changing to cingular and haven't looked back since... I left 3 months early and was paying the minimum $25 service so they wouldn't bill me the $200 termination penalty - which they did anyway but I sorted THAT out.

      ATTWS has a good selection of phones but their coverage down here was HORRIBLE, their customer service was terrible and their equipment was extremely unreliable.

      --
      Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
    5. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Westech · · Score: 1

      I've been a longtime Cingular customer using a TDMA plan. I've always been able to get a signal anywhere I go (throughout the cities and backwoods of Oklahoma.) A few months ago, I upgraded to a GSM phone and plan, as they are slowly requiring all customers to do, and my service is now terrible. I can barely get a signal in my house in midtown Tulsa. I never had problems with TDMA, but GSM is a nightmare. I don't think Cingular's GSM network is quite ready for primetime. Oh, how I wish I could re-activate my old phone!

    6. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      My impression of AT&T Wireless is that they are always advertising plans with low rates, like $19.95 a month and a free phone, but then if you look at what is included, it's not much. If you want to get a phone with decent features (nothing fancy, just the ability to store numbers and keep a log of recent calls) and a plan with a reasonable amount of features and minutes, all of a sudden AT&T is the most expensive option. That is why I have never even considered their service. Although I know AT&T Wireless was spun off from AT&T corporate, they still carry with them many aspects of AT&T culture, like the complete inability to compete in any truly competitive marketplace and the always-poor customer service. It's no surprise they have been losing customers in record numbers in recent years.

    7. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by plover · · Score: 1
      Well, I'm sincerely hoping that since analog service is slated to end on 1 Jan 2007 that AT&T is using this time to refit their analog towers with GSM equipment. As I said, I've noticed coverage improvements even over the four months I've owned the GSM phone, so I'm pretty sure they're on track to deliver coverage similar to their old analog service in the next two years.

      At least that's my hope. If not, that's about the time my contracts end and I will be shoveling my money to T-Mobile instead.

      --
      John
    8. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by mranchovy · · Score: 1

      Sounds like your "Salescreature" was dealing with AWEs awful old GSM customer service system, which was supposed to be fixed by the Odyssey II project that was completely botched (http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/04/17/17142 27&tid=187&tid=100&tid=193). Now you know why they got bought out.

      (I used to work at AT&T Wireless until earlier this year and wound up porting my number to Verizon a week before I left--I couldn't use my phone at home even though I lived right next to two interstate freeways outside of Seattle).

      --
      I am so smart!
      I am so smart!
      S-M-R-T!
      I mean S-M-A-R-T!
    9. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by smaug195 · · Score: 1

      Cingular actually has a great GPRS plan that I use https://www.cingular.com/media/media_purchase 8$ for a meg+250 texts + 50 MMS or 20$ for unlimited GPRS

    10. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by haroldK · · Score: 1

      It's interesting how different our experiences have been.

      I switched to AT&T from Sprint a few years ago. I went to the store in Roseville (not the kiosk in Rosedale, but the store just north of County Road C) and got great service. They were quick, knew what they were doing and got me on the right plan.

      I switched to GSM a year later. I had to replace my Nokia 3360 twice under warranty (which was a pleasant experience itself), so I figured I'd get a new phone since the warranty was running out on the 3360. I liked their service so much I went back to the store even though I usually prefer shopping online.

      I haven't had any billing issues or problems with the coverage area. I had 1 out of about 7 calls to customer support that was bad, but that's understandable. I've worked in call centers and I know what kind of crap happens.

      I'm not even going to get started on Sprint because I'd never stop.

    11. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Oylpann · · Score: 1

      I work for AT&T Wireless customer care. I answer your questions and bitching and whining when you call that "1-800-DUH" number on your bill. What's sad is, the GSM billing system we use is "powered by Siebel eBusiness" [www.siebel.com] This has got to be the biggest pos system I've ever used. Basically its a web based application and Plover is not exaggerating when he said that getting an address/name, etc put into the system takes about 5 different screens loading (about 5-10 mins based on latency issues). Its a web based system. You click or check one checkbox (to add a feature like text messaging for example) and you have to wait for the page to reload before clicking anything else. That's bad enough but I'm sure part of the problem also is that we lack server "throughput"(?) here. Constant latency issues. At one time they had intended (at the call center where I work anyway) to move all CSR's to be dual skilled reps which basically means they would take both TDMA calls and GSM calls. That would of course, reduce our call times since most of the TDMA only reps sit on their asses all day and take about 1/8 of the calls that GSM reps take. Siebel cannot support any more reps so now they have a department here called SST or Siebel Support Team. Their job is to go over a bill or rate plan or troubleshoot a customers phone but they cant actually make any changes on accounts. They have a stripped down version of our billing system. View only is all they have. Pretty much pointless since most people wouldn't be calling in if they didn't have something that needed changed eh? And to most of the SST's, troubleshooting means powering the phone off and then back on. If its something more difficult then that we get the call also. Perhaps you should bitch at the dealers and not the reps that you call into. Its true that you get alot of retards up here that don't know what the hell they are doing, and then there's some that have been here more than 3 years who do know. I completely understand that its a crap shoot every time you call in and I cant speak for all the fucktard reps that misinform our customers, but I have quite a few nasty things to say about the dealers. Dealers get commission for all those extra features they add on when you activate your service. They say "oh its free for the first month" if they tell you at all what they have added. What they don't tell you is that the following month your going to be billed for X amount of dollars for having them whether you asked for them or not. Not only that, but when you call in to get the features taken off, its going to bill your for a prorated amount up to the day in the bill cycle when you call in to have it removed. That means you have to call in twice (and wait on hold) for the same issue. Dealers add them in the hopes that you keep them for 60 to 90 days (whatever term gets them the commission). I had one customer today tell me that the dealer told him it was mandatory for him to have them for the first 30 days. I had another dealer refuse to sell a customer a phone because they customer had just upgraded her plan the previous day over the phone and renewed her contract and he wouldn't get commission for the contract selling her a new phone. She was calling me from the store she traveled to another city to purchase because a rep here on the phone told her she could do that and then was pretty much told she was SOL by the dealer, just because he wouldn't make that extra $10.00 or whatever they make for a contract renewal. Customers CAN AND DO THIS all the time. CSRs here (once again, in my call center at least) don't make commission off sales or contracts at all. They just pay better then most other call centers that I've worked at and have good benefits. It just pisses me off when a customer calls in upset because they are being billed for mmode, voicedial, enhanced international dialing, mobile assist, and text messaging on their 4 phone lines (how many of you have kids that are not old enough to drive? Or a child that doesn't

    12. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Oylpann · · Score: 1

      You can reactivate your old phone. Just tell them you want to reverse-migrate back to TDMA. AT&T Wireless can do that. I've used AT&T in the Broken Arrow, Oklahoma area and it seems to work fine there.

    13. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      A fellow sufferer, huh? I worked over in ICC/PNet back in 2000 while they were shutting the program down.

      Heh, old school ;)

      I worked there earlier this year, and it was just AT&T Wireless... there was no "regular phone" department.

      If you think TDMA/GSM was bad, bundled billing was a complete and utter nightmare since if something got 'stuck', you couldn't touch it at all on either the wireless or regular phone sides.

      Wanna know how they fixed that? No more bundled billing. If we had a customer with both a TDMA phone and a GSM phone, they got two bills.

      I'm guessing the level of service went WAY down after I left

      And it continues to spiral downward.

      my team didn't run into a whole lot of really angry customers over wireless issues

      There are happy wireless customers?

    14. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by plover · · Score: 1
      Well, thanks for the insight. I didn't feel "shafted" by the salesperson, but she signed us up for the wrong version of the plan. It was the same cost to me either way, so I think it was an honest mistake on her part after dealing with those stupid screens for an hour.

      And I didn't have a problem with the customer service rep on the phone -- once I got to him. The trick was getting to him. I had the phone on hold on the speakerphone for three hours (probably the prime-time hours of 8:00 PM to 11:00 PM CDT) without hearing from anyone other than a recording. It's probably just as well that you didn't answer that night, although I think I had already moved through the stages of anger and denial and had already transcended into acceptance. But I still will take my business to T-Mobile as soon as the opportunity presents itself. I don't want to be in the position of giving money to companies that go out of their way to be stupid about important things like customer service.

      Again, I hope the merger treats you well and that you get a system where you're actually able to assist the customers who call in, rather than have to live with the current fecal-smeared-screens for the rest of your days there. If Cingular has any brains at all, they'll bring their customer service application back in-house instead of outsourcing it to someone useless like Siebel who obviously doesn't give a shit. (Any Siebel employees out there want to defend this crap application? Thought not, just checking.) Nothing lights the fires of change like having your ass over the coals, and by being remote Siebel obviously isn't feeling that fire.

      --
      John
    15. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Oylpann · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the best wishes on a new systems. I hope so as well. From what I'm hearing, the call center where I'm at is going to be one out of five call centers that will be trained on transitioning customers from AT&T Wireless Service to Cingular. God lets just hope it goes better then the LNP kicked off over here.

      Oh and BTW, best times to call into Care is around 10pm CST and later. I know thats kind of late for some people but you wont have any hold times (usually). :)

    16. Re:Couldn't happen soon enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, yeah. Same with Colorado. No singular. It's a shame too, because back when I was interested in a phone, they had the best deal; cheaper rates, better family deal, and a more expensive phone for free. I was going for GSM only, and the other choice was AT&T, whose service seems to be relatively good here. But I decided I didn't need wireless, so no biggie.

      Those ads must be national ads, nevertheless I was pretty bummed out when I called and learned that they didn't service Colorado. Once the dust settles, perhaps I'll look 'em up again, though.

  47. T-Mobile Pay-as-you-go by slashing1 · · Score: 1

    I used to be a T-Mobile subscriber; excellent customer service. I'm unsure, however, if they have data with their "Pay as you go" program. Otherwise it fits your requirements.

  48. Suncom!? What'll happen to them in Virginia! by Pavan_Gupta · · Score: 1

    Well my friend, unlike you I've stuck with the att system, and I've been working with the retarded child of that system: Suncom. I live in Virginia, so this merger is supposed to directly affect me since Suncom itself is going to dissapear in the State of Virgina. I'm not quite sure what's going to happen to me .. or my plan .. or my SUPER SHITTY service, but even if they were to take my phone and slam it into a wall I'd probably be better off. Anyway, I'm posing the question you, slashdotters, what's next for the Suncom? Aiiee?

  49. Re:.ca? wtf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well it's second only to referring to cities by their Airport codes (SFO, LAX, DEL, MUM, HKG)...

  50. Re:Excellent! by tarunthegreat2 · · Score: 1

    You also forgot the outsourcing of any remaining call-centre services, billing and payroll....

  51. Guarded optimism by trudyscousin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rollover minutes are a fair, humane feature. The equipment both Cingular and AT&T offered has always had that certain geek factor not provided by most other providers (though T-Mobile looks pretty good in that respect).

    The thing is, I've been at Verizon for over two years as a refugee from some truly horrible Cingular service. Specifically, I had terrible luck trying to find an optimal place to use my phone, a problem I haven't had at all with Verizon.

    I'd love to get a Sony/Ericsson Bluetooth phone, something that Verizon just doesn't offer (their Motorola phones' Bluetooth implementation seems to be gimpy). But without decent reception, well, it wouldn't be much of a user experience. I'm going to be watching what develops here closely. If Cingular gets its act back together with regards to reception, sure, I'll go back.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, write technology blogs.
    1. Re:Guarded optimism by WiseWeasel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Note that GSM networks (at least as far as AT&T Wireless is concerned, and now Cingular too apparently) have been dramatically improved this past year. I tried AT&T's GSM service a year and a half ago, and it was so unusable, I had to switch back to their TDMA service for halfway decent reception (and having to give up my sweet Sony-Ericsson phone). As my 1-year contract ended, I switched to AT&T's GSM service a month ago, with a sweet Sony-Ericsson T637 bluetooth phone, and the service now rocks, with excellent reception everywhere, and this phone kicks ass. I will definitely be staying with this GSM service for a long time. The service I get now is worlds better than the TDMA service I had, and the sound quality is unbelievably better. You might do yourself a favor and check out the GSM service again now, as they've really done a huge amount of work on improving their new networks over the past year.

      --
      "I like systems, their application excepted", George Sand (French)
  52. Re:moderators are the real cowards by Dahan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's because the other schmuck submitted the article before you did. You know /. holds articles and releases them on a schedule, right? They're not posted the minute they're accepted.

  53. A breakout event. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its worth mentioning that AT&T still owns the rights to the AT&T Wireless name and will re-emerge in the near future as AT&T Wireless but basically reselling Sprint's service."

    Does this involve cocoons and an alien queen?

  54. At last! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
    Now I can get poor service AND poor service!

    Thanks Borg-like telecommunications conglomerations!

  55. I love it when a plan comes together! by vm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Whatever happened to the reasonable sounding conspiracy theory that AT&T Wireless bungled their CRM upgrade last year in order to sell the company? Upper management overrode their IT dept's plan for a gradual, piecemeal upgrade that would allow fallback and concurrent use of the older rev of Siebel. Instead, they were ordered to whack it in across the board and grab the oh shit handles.

  56. Rural area coverage by mwooldri · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I hope that Cingular/AT&T accelerate the roll out of GSM 800 ... otherwise it'll end up being just a city network. One of the main reasons that attracted me to AT&T in the first place is the "old fashioned" TDMA digital network with analog roaming for one single reason: it's more likely to get a signal 'out in the sticks'.

    Now what would be classified as 'out in the sticks'? Try Cherokee, NC. It's nestled in the Grreat Smoky Mountains, is home to a casino, what I would consider a major tourist center. GSM service stops (at least for Cingular) a little west of Asheville. At least I got a single analog dot on the AT&T in analog mode (though most of the time it did say no service). I think things were better with my wife's SprintPCS phone (analog & CDMA) last time she went over.

    Another "Rural" area? Eastern NC and the Outer Banks. There's a whole stretch east of Rocky Mount and west of Manteo that have no GSM service from either Cingular, or AT&T. And Suncom haven't even built their licensed network yet! Down from Nags Head, NC to Ocracoke is another GSM blank spot.

    So the strategy for Cingular/ATTWS IMO for these rural areas needs to be:

    a) roll out GSM800 where possible.
    b) Get a GSM 800/1900 phone with analog out there, and maybe even with CDMA 800/1900 also.

    Mark.

    1. Re:Rural area coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go to ebay and get a Nokia 6340i. It does GSM/TDMA/Analog. US analog and GSM are incompatible. Also, Network buildout for 800 is VERY fast as in in 3 months things can change dramaticaly.

  57. interesting but inconsequential on personal level by xeno · · Score: 1

    I used to work for AWS/McCaw, and have been a customer of theirs for about 10 years. But I dumped them two weeks ago for T-mobile. Why? Rates, service, general disregard for customers. The billing systems were a disaster when I was there some years ago, and the errors are still pretty regular. But the final straw was data services. Late to the GSM game, AWS still has relatively high voice rates to defray the change in infrastructure from TDMA to GSM, and charges $85/mo for GPRS service. As I sit here in the not-a-hotspot park and type this on my zaurus (bluetooth->T610->GPRS->tmobile), I'm paying less than 1/4 of the AWS data rates for constant connectivity. Sorry guys, too little, too late.

    Jon

    --
    I think not...(*poof*)
  58. This has been a source of great amusement by Rebel_Princess · · Score: 1
    I work at Cingular and I have to say as late as yesterday, _after_ the announcement, there were still people threatening to leave for AT&T. I actually was able to explain the man's bill, explain the merger with AT&T and 'save' him.
    That being said, if someone called in, freaked out and was a dick and didn't want to hear anything but "Here's free service for a year, your colon tastes mighty fine, sir!", then threatened to go to AT&T, I just kept my orange trap shut and winked at the tiny Nelson Muntz on my shoulder

    Not knowing your circumstances, we'll refrain (as with any large company, some people do get squashed).

    I wonder if there's a mercenary market for reps... "I read you bill, ten dollar.... eet's beeling correctly, senior... haahahaaahahaaaaa..."

    1. Re:This has been a source of great amusement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah i would like to know where the bad customer service comes from. This whole contract renewal stuff drives both reps and customers up the wall.

      billing issues = the worst calls

      In the thousands of calls ive taken, ive only had one call escalate to a supervisor, and only had about 4 of them hang up on me because i wouldnt credit them for valid charges and theyve only been a customer for two months. Plus i havent had one unresolved monitored call yet. So where is the bad customer service coming from?!?!?!

    2. Re:This has been a source of great amusement by johnnyb · · Score: 1

      Every month I had to call and get charges reversed for "roaming" even though I neve left the city. They were willing to do it, although, if they can tell that you were in-town when you made the call, WHY CAN'T THEIR BILLING SYSTEM?!?!?!!?

      In addition, I've been charged for a very interesting call. I was in the middle of a call to a number, say 555-5555. In the middle of the call, it says that I received a call from the number I was in the middle of talking to. That made me completely not believe any billing information they gave me, especially since our usage was 3x what we expected.

    3. Re:This has been a source of great amusement by Rebel_Princess · · Score: 1
      I don't know your rate plan, if you were on a Prefered Nation, it's possible to roam in your city. Or if your alpha tags/irdb are out of date (as is wont to happen when people don't power cycle their phone often or don't get those downloads), you can roam.
      It doesn't bill incorrectly for roaming. Roaming charges are billed from another carrier and sent to Cingular, that's how we know you were roaming.

      The other thing is called call delivery, don't ask me to explain it but it's on most bills, a call from the same number will appear twice, at either the same time or while in the time of that call, one with the billing code(with the code P = Peak, O = Offpeak, N or W = Weekends )... the other with a 4 next to it or no denotation, it denotes call delivery and if you add it up on your detailed billing, it's not charging you extra for it, it's not counted at all.

  59. Insider scoop. by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I run the SGSNs, GGSN's, DHCP and DNS, so I have a nice viewpoint of the merger.

    AWS built out EDGE before Cingular.
    AWS has the larger data network with more coverage.
    AWS has more RAN hardware than cingular.
    AWS launched UMTS, Cingular said they would continue it.
    AWS launched global roaming before everyone else.
    AWS has the largest wap/mmode content around.
    AWS has location based services, wifi, and many other services.
    AWS has many of the fortune 500 companies as customers.

    AWS Hired an outsourcing VP 2 years ago, they ran IT into the ground, crippled customer support. Customer support use to be live, you could get people to fix your issues, it was going the way of automation and lower paid support centers. Then they started forcing contracts and fucked up billing for customers, no wonder usnet has tons of complaints.

    The thing that pissed me off, they ran the company into the ground. Then the CEO's take almost 90 million each, while every employee that bought stock lost money. (Buy at 29, Cingular pays 15)

    Our CEO's hired the worst marketing firm in history, fluffy sheep anyone? I wanted to see a damn van fully loaded with RF gear, pull over and leave the "Can you hear me now" guy in dust. We do drive tests all over. Cant hire enough people quick enough to expand the network. (BTS Vendors, thats a post in itself...)

    Sad, it was a great company they ran into the ground to make CEO money and split. I started there 6 years ago after the mccaw buyout, been in operations ever since.

    Top if off, Cingular has been calling our network substandard to theirs. Who are they joking? I talk to the same freaking vendors...

    I'm not even going to post anonymous.

    1. Re:Insider scoop. by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      BTW, everything I said can be found in the news releases, and my state has a SLAPP law....

    2. Re:Insider scoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also part of the "Insider" group. I work at one of those outsourced call centers. However, it is not located in India, rather it is located in Canada. See, the deal with customer service has been a big issue with everyone.

      I've gone through the customer service training. It isn't easy, there are four weeks to cram 5 thick textbooks, 5 tests, and about 10 hours of online training. That doesn't even include the hours that we spend learning the programs that we use. To top it off, we have to maintain an 80%+ average to actually WORK in the call center.

      And after all that, we know the policies pretty much inside and out, along with the systems, plans, phones, and how to deal with customers. Now, the real thing that hurts customer service is policy. Customer care representatives are bound by policy, and that may be why we seem to be so horrible with customer service. People call in disputing valid charges, and the policies do not allow us to do anything about it, we have to make those charges stick. This makes us seem like real big a**holes, but honestly, we were not the ones who forced you to use for phone for as much as you did, and force you to rack up 300$ in overage charges.

      Plus, you try working in a call center and not getting short and abrupt with customers after twenty minutes of trying to explain the same thing to them over and over. Now, do not put words in my mouth and insinuate that I am calling Americans stupid. I am in no way shape or form doing that. I am merely stating that sometimes they can not figure out their bills, and even after we explain it to them three or four times, they still do not understand the charges. Finally, after twenty minutes of us repeating the same thing, you understand, and we can end the call, hopefully on a good note. Take that and repeat it 30 or 40 times a day, and you get a representative who is sick of explaining charges on someones invoice. I would love to help everyone who called in and had overage charges, but they were told that they would be charged if they went over their alotted minutes, so I have to make those charges stick.

      Now, onto the coverage issues that people have. NO COMPANY CAN EVER GUARANTEE SERVICE. EVER. We are truly sorry if you are having coverage issues, but sometimes theres certain areas that have coverage issues. Hopefully with the Cingular buyout, that will not really be a significant problem anymore, as AT&Ts TDMA and GSM coverage are quite extensive, and so is Cingulars. So instead of using just one network, you now get to use two networks.

      I think the funniest calls I have taken in the last month or so are the ones where people are calling to cancel service with AT&T, to go to Cingular. As soon as I hang the phone up, I say to myself "Talk to you again in a couple months".

    3. Re:Insider scoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would love to help everyone who called in and had overage charges, but they were told that they would be charged if they went over their alotted minutes, so I have to make those charges stick.

      No sympathy, brotha. You think our biggest beef is when we go over our monthly minutes and then try to weazle out of it, but aren't allowed to? Think again. I have a bigger problem with being overcharged, double billed, not billed for weeks and then all at once, not being allowed to transfer area codes without signing another contract (now THAT's a way to reward loyal customers), and customer "service" representatives that are all too happy to sell you a phone but avoid you like the plague when you walk into the store carrying one of their phones looking for help (ok, maybe that one's not your fault, but it contributes to customer animosity towards the company).

    4. Re:Insider scoop. by jedaustin · · Score: 1

      AWS Hired an outsourcing VP 2 years ago, they ran IT into the ground, crippled customer support. Customer support use to be live, you could get people to fix your issues, it was going the way of automation and lower paid support centers. Then they started forcing contracts and fucked up billing for customers, no wonder usnet has tons of complaints.

      Wow, that exactly describes my experience with them. Customer service was non-existent, they screwed up my bill and pissed me off, and didn't even say sorry! The $175 early termination fee PER PHONE was all that was keeping me with them the last 8 months of my 2 year contract.

      People couldn't understand me when I called them and actually asked me to call them from a real phone. I complained to ATTWS and their solution was to switch to a new phone on a different network. It sounded reasonable, except for one thing.. IT DIDN'T WORK. The new phone sounded just as bad as the old one and now I didn't have 'pocketnet' any more.

      Customer service was flat out rude, screwed up my bill, and it took me FOUR calls to get them to fix it (each time they SAID they fixed it.. but low and behold when the bill came, they didn't). I ended up dropping to the lowest plan they offered (Still $40/month for both phones) for the last 3 months and threw the phones in a drawer. Then I signed up with a different provider, Alltel, and my problems went away.

      JD

    5. Re:Insider scoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sadly, similar things seem to be happening at other companies...Universal Studios was bought by GE after Vivendi's mismanagement. GE is the largest outsourcer in the U.S. GE hands management of Universal to NBC (guppy managing a whale), IT outsourcing starts. First with the helpdesk having to train their Indian replacements who were flown in (and will fly out after training). The desktop support will soon be temped out to third-party agencies, and now networking and server administrators are on the verge of being forced to switch to hourly at less than 40 hours/week (no benefits after a certain drop of hours, so cheaper).

      Sad, but no longer my problem. I was laid off

    6. Re:Insider scoop. by ap0 · · Score: 1

      My mom is in charge of one of AWS's billing systems, so whenever I see her I always ask about it/the company, since I find that stuff really interesting. She told me that one of the biggest problems is some guy named "r0ml", who actually uses his geek-speak name when talking to people in person. AWS hired some bumblefuck VP a couple years ago (as BrookHarty said), who hired r0ml and a bunch of other cronies, and started screwing everything up. r0ml also apparently is constantly having the company fly him (first class, no less) across the country from Redmond, WA (AWS's HQ) to New York. I'm sure AWS's systems could be much better operated by Cingular.

  60. The legality of the service message... by adzoox · · Score: 1

    I have Cingular.

    I love the service.

    I especially love the SIM card type phones.

    Cingular/AT&T offer the best technology for phones as far as I can see.

    I also like the fact that Apple is in close partnership with Cingular.

    I do have one problem though.

    I recently had to pay an $850 phone bill due to a Cingular mistake. I kept getting billed for a 000 000 0000 number. They admitted it. I had told them this has been going on for quite a while, but since I have had below plan minute useage (until August) my bill was just being paid.

    They claimed that they could only do 3 months worth of removing calls (that's great accept I realized it had stolen almost 400 rollover minutes)

    I put the bill into dispute.

    They ended the dispute without telling me - turned off my phone service, charged me $30 to turn my phone back on.

    For the week that my phone was down (had to get the money up to pay the bill) this message greeted customers:

    "The number you are trying to reach is not a working number, please check the number and try your call again"

    This most likely cost me a $1000 in business (proveable) as I have only a cellphone - and I have had the same number for over 8 years 905 APPL (i'm an Apple Consultant)

    Does anyone know who I can reach high up to complain and possibly get my situation worked out more favorably?

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:The legality of the service message... by David_W · · Score: 1
      Does anyone know who I can reach high up to complain and possibly get my situation worked out more favorably?

      Consult with your local Better Business Bureau. They will contact the company on your behalf. It can take several months, but they can get people to come out the woodwork that will practically beg to fix the problem.

    2. Re:The legality of the service message... by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 1

      The BBB has no legal standing, and companies no longer care about their BBB reputation, since most customers don't bother to check it. In the case of blatant fraud, call your state attorney general. Most AGs now are all too eager to take on some big corporation, especially if other people can be found who are experiencing the same problems.

    3. Re:The legality of the service message... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.howardforums.com

      Go to the cingular forum. Do some searching, post your story.

    4. Re:The legality of the service message... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Cingular Wireless Office Of the President Stanley T. Sigman 5565 Glenridge Connector Atlanta GA 30349 404-236-6000 THIS WAS SOME HARD INFO FOR ME TO COME BY

    5. Re:The legality of the service message... by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1
      You can't do a damn thing , unfortunately. Your service agreement fully states that they have no liability for lost money due to service loss.

      This is doubly true IF the phone you have was created for personal use and not business use, but you've been using it for business purposes anyway.

    6. Re:The legality of the service message... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Write a letter, write a letter, write a letter. Phone calls do not work.

      I had a problem with a broken phone from Cingular. (It acted as if a hands-free thingy was plugged in but it wasn't; I couldn't hear anyone talking because it was trying to send the sound through a non-existant ear bud).

      My local store took my phone, gave me a piece-of-shit loaner, and said the repair and shipping would take 6-8 weeks.

      After 11 weeks and no word from them, I started calling the store. Every time I called, they were too busy to take my call so I would leave a message. (They were a very busy store - lines would go out the door during lunch, which is why I couldn't take my lunch hour to see them in person). They never once returned my messages.

      Eventually I wrote a letter to the Cingular headquarters. I also sent a copy to the manager of the local store. In it, I explained what happened and the crappy service I was getting. Then I listed exactly what they were going to do to make it better - 1. Send me a new phone (not refurbished) immediately. 2. Find the old phone and send that to me too, cause I needed the address book. 3. Credit my account for 3 months because the loaner phone was a piece of shit and I basically couldn't use the service I was paying for. I didn't ask them, I told them these were the things they needed to do, otherwise I would cancel my contract and not pay any of their cancellation fees.

      Not only did they give me every thing I listed, I got calls from the local manager, some regional VP, and the customer service VP apologizing for the problems.

      (As an aside, I've always loved Sony Ericsson phones, but lately have decided I wanted a clamshell and I've never seen an SE clamshell... Luckily it appears Cingular will be offering an exclusive Sony Ericsson clamshell soon. Yay!)

  61. I use TMobile and... by marktaw.com · · Score: 1

    I use T-Mobile (long story), and on my phone, even before the merger, I could go in to the phone and manually select the network I was on. I got two options - T-Mobile and AT&T. I called customer service to check that I wouldn't be charged roaming for this, and since I'm on a national plan, I'm not.

    So I had to ask myself - is T-Mobile any worse than AT&T/Cingular because it seems to be able to piggyback off of it's network, or at least the AT&T part.

    A magazine article I read several months back that mentioned the merger said that the increased coverage (Cingular + AT&T) would benefit some rural customers, but Verizon would still likely be king of the urban sprawl. I also found it odd that AT&T promotes it's "New GSM America" that "Added umpteen new towers" for the "bets network ever" and "how many bars do you have?" but Cingular, who has the worst reputation (everyone knows Verizon = Good, Cingular = Bad) said nothing about it.

    1. Re:I use TMobile and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only problem is T-Mobile is only a 1900 MHz network whereas Cingular/AT&T are 850 and 1900 MHz. T-Mobile does not offer phones that are 850 MHz based, or have in roaming agreements set up with Cingular/AT&T for this frequency. You can roam on the 1900 MHz areas of the Cingular/AT&T network, but all new infastructure is being built out as 850 MHz, basically a TDMA overlay. What this basically means is you do not have the same coverage as a Cingular/AT&T customer.

  62. Heh by purduephotog · · Score: 1

    Just goes to show you, all those high school dropouts that thought employment was easy have a long way in front of them.

    Sis works at an AT&T store with her husband. Both college degrees. I get to hear about some of their more colorful customers now and then... and they make more money than I do ;)

  63. Re:Suncom!? What'll happen to them in Virginia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll field this one. Suncom would become a third tier of Cingular, so it no longer will actually have that name. Instead you will be moved to a Cingular Transitional plan(which should offer you some pretty decent promotions), and your service area should improve.

    -- An AWS employee

  64. Re:Does this mean I'm no longer roaming on AT& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes that will be the case, but do not hold me to my word yet, i am not a 100% sure of when this is going to be in effect. watch the news and cingulars website to be sure.

    AWS employee

  65. Re:Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah, the outsourced call centers in canada are about to get the great big shaft. theyd better have some sort of severance package for this thing if they are going to dump us. my call center is the largest remaining TDMA center for all of AWS, and we consistently put out top level statistics. Funny thing is, its in Canada.

  66. Check out the FUD version of this article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 96576 Someone should educate this woman.

  67. Remember CellularOne? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CellularOne managed to rid itself through an aggressive marketing campaign paid for by many unhappy customers. Their slick advertisements made everyone forget that Cingular is just a new front for the CellularOne company.

  68. For you new ATT customers... by gelfling · · Score: 1

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    You have now fallen into the black hole of horrible service. You might as well stop using the phone.

    ATT wireless is bar none the absolute worst in terms of customer service.

    -They flat out lie to you most of the time regarding the contract in the basic T&C and how or if the contract can be changed.
    -They give you different answers to the same questions, no one who works there can really give a coherent answer to anything.
    -They hide critical details from you like if you make even the slightest change to your contract, even if that change is a correction to a mistake THEY made it will add at least another year to your contract.
    -They NEVER NEVER honor insurance on a lost/damaged phone - never. It's straight up theft for them to charge for insurance because there are zero instances where they honor it.
    -There is no phone number to call for help first - your only 'option' is email and then a phone number to call. Once you do call, expect to spend at least 2 hours on the phone.
    -The bill is utterly impenetrable - no one, not even them can explain what the individual items are. It's entirely possible that there are all sorts of fraudulent charges in the bill.
    -The service itself is spotty and horrible - if you like noise and dropouts and an inability to even get a dialtone more than 4 out of 5 attempts then please use ATT.
    -Voicemail has NEVER worked correctly - I had to eventually have voicemail turned off because messages could not be retrieved, ever.

    ATT should rot in hell and the people who work there need to drown to death in the blood of their own children.

    1. Re:For you new ATT customers... by hatefulmofo · · Score: 1
      Some of the points you brought up are flat out wrong.

      Contracts - legally binding documents in the same way a rental lease is a legally binding agreement between 2 individuals. Do not fault ATT because you don't read the fine print.

      Different answers to same question - I wont contest that, you're absolutely right. The problem goes right up the ladder from the front-line reps to the middle-top management. You ask about a policy/procedure and you'll get one answer from your supervisor. You'll make a change, then a week later get negative feedback from the QUALITY team for making a change you were never allowed to do. It creates an atmosphere on the customer service end where we, the underpaid undertrained reps will tell you whatever "SAFE" answer we can come up with that will result in the lease repercussions.

      Insurance - I'm not sure what crack you're smoking, but if your phone is lost or stolen or damaged, lock\line, the insurance company will cover it. The only exceptions are thus: You have to have insurance on your acct for at least 15 days before you can make a claim. Once you make a claim they charge a 35 dollar deductable.

      Getting customer service - DIAL 611 on your wireless phone, or the 1-800 number written all over your bill and on the ATT Wireless website. Just because there isn't a button on the phone to call directly doesn't mean the number isn't given to you.

      Bills - Again, no argument. I can certainly read the bills just fine. However, I've had public auditors and certified accountants call in who can't make heads or tails of the cryptic billing layout. The trouble is doubled if you've recieved a credit in the last month.

      Changing your rate plan - If you do make a change to add a promotion to the line, in most instances you need to accept a new 2 year contract. As far as fixing mistakes in your rate plan from the time of activation, you have until your FIRST FULL INVOICE to make that correction. If you let it go 6 months then call in because of 'our' mistake, that is entirely YOUR FAULT. If you do make that correction in the first month, your contract is not extended.

    2. Re:For you new ATT customers... by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Are you me? Do you have my experience? No?

      Then Shut the Fuck Up, seriously Shut the fuck up.

    3. Re:For you new ATT customers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And are you everybody else who gets perfectly acceptable service from them? Shut up.

    4. Re:For you new ATT customers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do not lie about the TC or the contracts. People sign contracts, they have a copy of the TC. We see the same TC that you do. I am sorry if you cant understand legal verbiage.

      Unfortunately, you do receive different answers from different representatives. Sometimes it may be due to one reps misinformation, and another one correcting it, or a change in policy. Also see the other comment for another reason.

      If it is an honest AT&T mistake, we will credit you back and fix the mistake without extending the contract. See other comments on this too

      AT&T is not an insurance company, they are a wireless company. There is an external company who handles the insurance for us. Lock/Line insurance to be exact. So when we are charging you for insurance, that is actually Lock/Line's charge.

      #611 on your cellphone or 1-800-888-7600. It has never been a secret. It's pasted everywhere. And no, do not expect to take two hours on the phone, unless of course you have some really odd complex problem that involves several different internal calls to get it solved. Average call time is between 7 minutes and 15 minutes. The only time I have taken calls that take longer then that is due to billing disputes or other things like that. Hell, I can get a customer to program a motorola v60(quite possibly one of the nastiest phones to program) in under 10 minutes. So it is not the two hour calls you claim.

      There are no fradulent charges on the bill. They list out the monthly service charge, including all your features. Then they have seperate amounts for night and weekend, mobile-to-mobile, promotional minutes, and included in-plan minutes.
      Hell, they even list out the taxes seperately. Then for those of you who have detailed billing, you see every single call/text message you made.

      We can not guarantee service everywhere, all the time. If your phone was working that little, and happened all the time, then it was most likely a problem with the phone itself, not with our service.

      Maybe you just had no clue how to access your voicemail. I mean I've had senior citizens program phones to be able to automatically retrieve messages. I've also been able to instruct a first time cellular user to access the voicemail. We can't help your problem if your just too frigging stupid to use a cell phone. People like you should not have a cell phone.

    5. Re:For you new ATT customers... by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      "-Voicemail has NEVER worked correctly - I had to eventually have voicemail turned off because messages could not be retrieved, ever."

      Had the same problem with my phone initially. It was a configuration problem that a at&t wireless tech solved. It took a full day to find it but they eventually did.

      "-The service itself is spotty and horrible - if you like noise and dropouts and an inability to even get a dialtone more than 4 out of 5 attempts then please use ATT."

      Last time I checked you don't get dial tones with cell phones. You dial the number and press send. No such thing as a dial tone so I'm placing bets that you are now trolling but just in case you aren't...Where are you located? If at&t isn't the primary provider in your area then yeah, you will have problems. In my area almost everyone has sprint, but I'm the only one that can get reception in my office building, and I have at&t. I have great reception in my area.

      "-There is no phone number to call for help first - your only 'option' is email and then a phone number to call. Once you do call, expect to spend at least 2 hours on the phone."

      As someone else said, the 800 number is on the bill and online. Not their fault you can't read.

      "-They NEVER NEVER honor insurance on a lost/damaged phone - never. It's straight up theft for them to charge for insurance because there are zero instances where they honor it."

      I never get phone insurance, but I bet there is fine print just like every carrier.

  69. Re:Does this mean I'm no longer roaming on AT& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn';t you get the memo? Months ago AT&T sent out letters explaining that you can roam onto Cingular, and I believe T-Mobile now because they all have a GSM roaming agreement with each other.

    I know for a fact i can use the Cingular network and I have on a few occasions, nothing extra on my bill. Long time AT&T customer because I have no T-Mobile reception at my house.

  70. Mobile to Mobile by kantellopo · · Score: 1

    Any ideas on how this will affect mobile to mobile minutes? I have cingular, will I be able to talk to AT&T Wireless subscribers with my mobile to mobile minutes now?

  71. The real question by kmmatthews · · Score: 1

    is: can I use this as terms to cancel my contract? I recently upgraded my plan - which comes with a renewed two year contract.

    Gee, I'm glad they told me about that little detail. sheesh.

    --
    feh. stuff.
    1. Re:The real question by slcdb · · Score: 1

      Probably not. According to the newcingular.com website, the terms of AT&T customers' service contracts are not changing. If they don't change, you don't have an "out" unless Cingular decides to be nice and just give you the option (doubtful).

      Of course, if they DO try to change the terms of service in the near future, you'd clearly have a way out.

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
  72. Can anybody translate this for me? by Se7enLC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ok, here are two snippits from the article. Can somebody make sense of them for me?

    #1

    Plans are already underway to make Rollover Minutes available to you. Please check back on November 10, 2004 for an update. Our goal is to have this feature available to you by this holiday season. To get a plan with Rollover, you will need to change to a Cingular Nation® Plan $39.99 or higher. You will also need to get a new Cingular GSM phone.

    #2

    Q: What happens to my existing rate plan?

    A: Rest assured, you will continue to enjoy the benefits of your current rate plan and features.


    Ok, my question is - is it possible to KEEP my at&t plan and get rollover minutes? I don't see how they say I can keep my current rate plan and features when I would have to change plans to get the features they advertise (I would normally have no problem with switching to Cingular...but my att plan has 650 anytime minutes....and I don't think Cingular even offers that).

    ALSO - why on earth do I need a new phone to change how they bill me? the PHONE doesn't bill me (and I'm sure if it did, people would have hacked/phreaked them by now to make free calls)

    1. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wondered that too, especially for the rollover minutes. I already have an at&t nationwide plan that includes everything the cingular plan does. Why would one need a new Cingular GSM phone to take advantage of rollover minutes. In theory they should just issue new sim cards.

    2. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Zed2K · · Score: 1

      Hate replying to myself.

      I looked further on the web site:

      Q: Why do I need to get a new wireless phone when I want to get Cingular's current rate plans or services?

      A: Cingular's rate plans and services require unique software in your wireless phone to function properly. Unfortunately, AT&T Wireless phones are not equipped to support many of the benefits of Cingular's voice and data services. Therefore, to take advantage of the latest services Cingular offers, a new handset is required.

      Making the transition to a Cingular phone is easy. Plus, we offer a wide selection of innovative wireless phones. From basic voice and text messaging capable wireless phones to state-of-the art models with integrated cameras, multimedia messaging and wireless Internet features, we're confident we have a Cingular phone to meet your needs.

      Which is BS if you already have a GSM phone. The cingular networks and at&t networks are basically the same as far as network types. I have a motorola v600 phone and cingular sells the v400 which is basically the same just not as many features as my v600. Why should I be forced to step down in phone types in order to get rollover minutes added on to my phone when the only thing that needs to be changed would be the sim card.

      There's gonna be a lot of pissed off at&t wireless folks if they make people buy new phones just so the phone says cingular instea of at&t at boot up.

    3. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      >why on earth do I need a new phone to change how they bill me?

      Because the billing is done now with four different billing systems, two of which they outsource completely.

      I happen to work at the company that currently does AT&T Wireless. We have an older legacy mainframe system where most of their billing is done, and a newer unix client/server system that they were in the middle of migrating to when this happened.

      The phones are on completely different networks now, and the billing system your service uses is solely determined by that. Until they consolidate their billing by either merging to one system (which takes years) or by enhancing each system to have identical billing features (which could take as long), the only way to get billed by a different system, and get the billing features you want, is to change networks. Some phones can be switched, some can't (you can't take a TDMA phone and switch it to GSM unless you want to be stuck with analog-only service). You may have to get an new phone to move from a AWS network to a Cingular one.

      >the PHONE doesn't bill me

      *sigh*

    4. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Se7enLC · · Score: 1

      looks like they have the same phone I do, the samsung x426/7.

      What I'm worried about is that if I trade up to Cingular, I have to get a new contract, and a new plan. It doesn't look like any of Cingular's plans match my current plan (650 anytime, unlimited night/weekend/mobile-to-mobile, $39/mo). Will they let me just keep my current plan? And for how long?

    5. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot Password won't work, so I can't get credit for this.



      Anyways, Cingular has 1000 anytime minutes for 39.99 if you switch plans by the end of the month. I need to call them to find out why this wasn't offered to me when I signed up for my phone just over a month ago.

    6. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also with Cingular when you roam regardless of the time it uses your anytime minutes. This is NOT the case with AT&T.

    7. Re:Can anybody translate this for me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah... the catch to that one is, no free Nights & Weekends.

  73. Re:Suncom!? What'll happen to them in Virginia! by SgtXaos · · Score: 1

    Virginia (Hampton Roads) Suncom as well. I am hoping for good things, though. See, I recently switched to GSM and a cool tiny nokia 3100. Love the phone and battery life, but my signal strength went from decent to almost nil when I am inside my house. I can get better signal upstairs, or if I walk into the kitchen or a few other specific "hot zones". It is maddening. And Suncom customer service is something only Dante could identify with. Clueless and arbitrary, and highly random (based on who you chance to deal with), it is unbelievable.

    I hope Cingular is a drastic improvement for us.

    --
    -- Don't call me "Sir," I increase entropy for a living!
  74. Re:1 + 1 = 0 by haydenth · · Score: 1

    She's probably right. Each of the mini-cells they use only has so much bandwidth and when all the voice channels are used, the cell dropps any calls that are transferred to it. However, I'm not saying the cellular company shouldn't PLAN for that, they should.

    It has nothing to do with your signal and everything to do with how many voice channels they have installed in the cell.

    --
    - tom -
  75. Re:Does this mean I'm no longer roaming on AT& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also you may want to try jsut simply turning your wireless phone off while you are at work. That was the phone call will be forwarded to your desk phone on the first or second ring. (since the phone goes right to voicemail when it is turned off)

    AWS Employee

  76. Perfect Timing...I've been waiting... by da3dAlus · · Score: 1

    I'll read the comments for sure, so my apologies if I'm asking something already asked. But as a current Cingular customer who's about to finish his local state plan, I'm thinking of going to a nationwide plan. Is anyone currently an AT&T or Cingular customer with such a plan? What do you like/don't like about your plan? If you could sign up for a different nationwide plan, which would you choose--and are they really that different?

    --

    Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    1. Re:Perfect Timing...I've been waiting... by bla · · Score: 1

      i have a cingular nation plan, or whatever they call it. it's a GSM plan.

      i pay ~$85/mo for "taxes and fees", 850 minutes, rollover, 5000 "night and weekend minutes", mobile-to-mobile, and a second line for my husband.

      the plan is expensive, but i was paying $45/mo for 350/3500, no mobile-to-mobile, and no rollover on my old TDMA plan with one line, so a comparison from one cingular plan to another makes it look comparatively cheap, for what i'm getting. the reason i got the national plan was because at the time, it was the only plan that they claimed wouldn't charge you roaming if your phone picked up another carrier's network. and indeed, i've never been charged roaming.

      i have no real complaints about cingular's reception or customer service. however...it might be the phone. i have a nokia 3590 and i get partial to full reception anywhere i go. i haven't had a reception problem since i switched to their GSM network (the TDMA phone used to drop during a call to voicemail, for some weird reason). my husband has a sony ericsson T616, and he can't get reception a lot of places i can. YMMV, as they say.

      oh, and for comparison, as other people have stated, the T616 has full bluetooth capabilities.

    2. Re:Perfect Timing...I've been waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was the only plan that they claimed wouldn't charge you roaming if your phone picked up another carrier's network. and indeed, i've never been charged roaming.

      But they use your anytime minutes even if it's during nights & weekends. Currently AT&T DOES NOT do this.

    3. Re:Perfect Timing...I've been waiting... by bla · · Score: 1
      But they use your anytime minutes even if it's during nights & weekends. Currently AT&T DOES NOT do this.

      not according to my last bill. it clearly has regular minutes and N+W minutes delimited.

  77. Hope Cingular realizes not to fuck over IT by gatesh8r · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Remember kids! Never try to move your IT department to India while you're in the middle of a required upgrade forced by the FCC. AT&T Wireless Self-Destructs.

    ...and I'm glad that some AT&T Wireless execs are out of jobs. Maybe they can become a contractor. :P

    --
    Karma whorin' since 1999
  78. Destiny of TDMA "Free2Go" phones? by MsGeek · · Score: 1
    I happily switched to T-Mobile, but my husband is still with AT&T and a TDMA "Free2Go" phone. He rarely uses the blasted thing...it's basically in the glove compartment for emergency purposes.

    How long before Cingular cuts off all its TDMA customers, including prepaid customers? I need to know that because I need to know when I'm going to have to dig deep and buy him a new phone.

    BTW: if and when I have to do this, he's moving to T-Mobile too. (on the Prepaid side) After being abused by AT&T when I tried to move from my prepaid TDMA account to a GSM account last year, once bitten, twice shy.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  79. Long Live GSM by akajerry · · Score: 1

    I love this merger if only because finally the single largest wireless carrier in the US is a GSM carrier. After years of GSM being a second citizen in the US wireless market finally it has a real chance at the mainstream.

    Say what you want about the technical advatages/diasadvantages of GSM vs CDMA. I know CDMA is technically superior in quality and bandwidth utilization, which is why 3rd generation GSM will be based on CDMA instead of TDMA. But, GSM has two huge advatages:

    1) The idea of putting all the customer information, including phonebook, on a smart card was just brilliant. I've shopped for GSM phones in Europe and India and the selection of phones is mind boggling. And to try out a phone you just slip your SIM into the phone and give it a try. Of course, they don't play these locking games outside the US, hopefully Cingular will continue its unlocked policy.

    2) GSM phone support real international roaming. My wife once asked a cell phone saleperson about international roaming and was told how her phone would work in Canada. Now international roaming charges are outrageous everywhere in the world, although the US carriers are by far the worse, but still it's nice to be able to use your phone while transiting through one country on the way to the other. When you get to your final destination just pop a pre-paid SIM card into your phone.

  80. Not entirely correct by 10Brett-T · · Score: 1

    T-mobile offers the Nokia 6010, a GSM phone that supports both 850 and 1900 MHz bands.

    --
    10Brett-T
    Oh, bother.
    1. Re:Not entirely correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Tmobile has LOCKED that phone along with the moto v600, nokia 6800, and Nokia 3595 to only use 1900 mhz

  81. Cingular...pretty sweet, but they have dead zones by MsGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Los Angeles, Santa Barbara and San Diego (the only places I've used my T-Mobile GSM phone) connectivity is pretty sweet.

    If I have a T-Mobile GSM phone, why do I know about Cingular's network? Because T-Mobile has had colocation rights on Cingular infrastructure on the West Coast since forever, and because I have an unlocked Euro-Phone (Ericsson r520m) the display identifies the actual network I'm on, not the service provider.

    The only annoyances are that my apartment is under a dead zone, and at the current place that SFVLUG meets, it's also under a dead zone. I have to take a short walk to get to the next tower to place a call.

    You should see some improvement if AT&T starts taking advantage of Cingular's infrastructure. Verizon has a crappy "home" zone for its users (If you call in Santa Barbara and you are an LA user, you get hit with roaming fees) and cuts no deals if you are a Verizon landline customer.

    If you want to switch, go T-Mobile. Easily the geekiest mobile company on the planet, with all-you-can-eat GPRS (mobile internet) or all-you-can-eat "Hot Spot" 802.11b service for $20/month ($40/month for both) if you have a mobile phone with them.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  82. Re:1 + 1 = 0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree 100% - and you're right that they should have planend for it or at least have upgrades planned. When I asked, they said there are no upgrades planned for my area. I wish cell phone companies were like cable providers in the respect that they don't require any contracts. Simply month-month billing.

  83. DWI is more than a DDR simulator by tepples · · Score: 1

    how is talking on your cell any different than talking to a passenger in the car? You don't pull over in the latter instance, so why would you in the former?

    Studies show that passengers subconsciously shut up when they see that you're getting into a tricky driving situation. But unlike a passenger, a caller doesn't unless you ask her to, and unless and until you so ask, the impairment compares to driving at .08% blood alcohol concentration.

  84. Why is the US mobile market so rubbish? by seraphina · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a genuine question...

    In the UK, calls have been getting cheaper and competition between networks is pretty intense. I think it's like this in most of Europe. So where has the US gone wrong?

  85. So should I buy a cheap ATTW Treo 600 now??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw all the sweet deals on amazon.com on Treo 600's for ATTWireless....I was hesistant b/c I am currently with Cingular and didn't know if this merger would happen, but if I can save $300 through rebates on a Treo 600 and switch to ATTW, then eventually I'd be back on Cingular right???

    Seems like a decent way to get a cheap GSM Treo 600, and eventually be back on Cingular.

  86. Customer Care? by txag98 · · Score: 1

    "An anonymous AT&T Customer Care agent, who is sick of dealing with retards like yourself. Read your fucking Terms of Service, THEN come bitch to us." Makes me want to call AT&T for Customer Care.

  87. AT&T Customer Service NIGHTMARE by lfm_the_couch · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I originally switched to AT&T from Cingular because
    • Cingular's coverage was spotty even in Los Angeles;
    • Outgoing phone calls got dropped about 40% of the time without so much as an error message;
    • Cingular's coverage did not extend north of about San Francisco;
    • The last straw was when I went to a wedding in Arcata and everyone else has AT&T phones, which worked perfectly.
    Technically, as someone else mentioned, AT&T is relatively problem-free. However, I recently got married, so I added my wife's line to my plan and got new GSM phones. WHAT A FREAKIN' NIGHTMARE! AT&T has separate "departments" for individual administrative operations. That is, they have:
    • a "Customer Information Department" which could change her name and address but couldn't move her account under mine and forwarded me to the...
    • ... "Change of Financial Responsibility Department" which could move her account under mine but couldn't sell me a phone so they sent me to the...
    • ... "Sales Department" which couldn't sell me a GSM phone because I hadn't upgraded my account to GSM and forwarded me to the...
    • ... "3G Upgrade Department" which upgraded me to "3G" (sales talk for GSM) and sent me back to the ...
    • ... "Sales Department" which couldn't sell me a GSM phone because they were the "Wireless Sales Department", not the...
    • ... "GSM Sales Department", which DID sell me a phone and to complete the process I was handed to the...
    • ... "Customer Service Department", which could do NOTHING for me because they were actually the "Wireless Customer Service Department" and not the...
    • ... "GSM Customer Service Department", where I at LONG FREAKIN' LAST completed what should have been ONE TRANSACTION WITH ONE CUSTOMER SERVICE REP.
    I therefore heartily agree with the poster who urges Cingular to burn everything associated with AT&T Customer DisService.
  88. freedom's just another word 4 nothin' left to lose by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    AT&T has the most agressive developer programs, for data apps and smartphones, of any of the American mobile telcos. When they've divested from their aging network, though they've extended its life with broad(er)band like EDGE, what platform will those apps run on? Or are they going to a network-agnostic development platform, leveraging Java across the various radio systems to offer apps and data services to anyone, regardless of their carrier pigeonhole?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  89. Re:Does this mean I'm no longer roaming on AT& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be careful about roaming with Cingular. They bill your anytime minutes even if it's night or on the weekend. Right now AT&T doesn't do this, I hope this doesn't change after the merger.

  90. Charged coming and going by Media+Girl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Maybe I'm just too cheap, but $40 to be able to use the phone's full internet capability per month seems pretty outrageous to me, considering that's more than either my cable or DSL bill. Maybe I'm biased because I first saw T-Mobile's WiFi "deal" at a Starbucks in SF; $20/month in a city where WiFi is practically ubiquitous and free struck me as ridiculous.

    If I were to open a coffee shop, the first thing I would do is install WiFi and offer it for free, just to help draw customers. I think Starbucks blew it on this one. All any competitor would have to do is offer free WiFi and Starbucks would lose a signficant part of their coffee-on-the-couch crowd.

  91. Competition is out there by Media+Girl · · Score: 1

    A T-Mobile dealer in a shopping mall was offering me the Treo 600 unlocked for $300. When the phones get pricier, or also serve as PDAs, the value of having one unlocked becomes more apparent and many cellular dealers use an unlocked phone to draw you into their service. It's no loss to them, since you still have to sign a contract, which is where they make their money.

  92. Cingular address by adzoox · · Score: 1

    thank you.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
  93. About the Better Business Bureau by adzoox · · Score: 1

    I agree ... the BBB is a joke now.

    They take too long to respond. They are often out of the office and usually don't understand or care to understand technical/technological issues.

    I had someone from eBay file a false BBB report on me. It took over a year to resolve the issue.

    I vowed that when i opened my brick and mortar business that I would not be bullied into membership (which is $495).

    It does help to file a report online and at least have a record of complaint.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny