Slashdot Mirror


Time Lapse of Lunar Eclipse

MufasaZX writes "Start with a relatively rare occurrence, the complete lunar eclipse from last Wednesday. Next add the amazingly rare, a perfectly clear fog free night in San Francisco, as viewed from the cliffs overlooking the Golden Gate Bridge. Then I set up my trusty Sony MiniDV camcorder and wide angle lens on a tripod and proceeded to freeze my butt off for 2 hours. Dump the video into Premier, accelerate it 200x to just 37 seconds, and the resulting video is IMHO simply stunning. Until my web server gets crushed you can download it here, but after that please use your Gnutella client of choice and search for LunarEclipse-10-2004.wmv."

286 comments

  1. Need more speed scotty!! by MrEcho.net · · Score: 1

    Someone needs to host this file.
    Im getting 2.0kB/sec

    1. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Krilomir · · Score: 1

      A torrent would be even better.

    2. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      I'm only getting 0.3.....but then again I'm on dialup.

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    3. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 0

      Well, mine did finish downloading, so here you go -

      http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~metlin/LunarEclipse-10-2 004.wmv

      I would appreciate it if you'd be easy on the server, though =)

      And btw, it's quite a cool video, but it would have been cooler still if it were more of a close-up. At that distance, it looks a little obscure.

    4. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by andrewjhall · · Score: 1

      That link looks dead to me... If you've got it throw it up on torrent or gnutella.

    5. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by ZenJabba1 · · Score: 1

      file not found - 404... we killed that one too!

      --
      `find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;`
    6. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Saven+Marek · · Score: 1

      I, have put it up too. mine worked.

      download from here in the first, gallery.

    7. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by ewithrow · · Score: 1

      Your link is 404. I'm glad I'm not the only tech student up at 5 am on a weekend.

    8. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 0

      Posted it and foobarred.

      Hold on, here's another one -

      metlin.org/temp_dir/LunarEclipse-10-2004.wmv

      This one *works* :-)

      Yeah, I'm glad that am not the only tech student up at 5 AM on a weekend too ;)

    9. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already dead.

    10. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks, it works. But you forgot an http:// in the link...

    11. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 4, Informative

      ARGHHHHHHHH!

      Not my fucking day.

      http://www.metlin.org/temp_dir/LunarEclipse-10-200 4.wmv

      *YES I PREVIEWED IT*

      I think my servers have some sense of the future, they don't want to BURNNNN.

      And man, I wish Slashdot didn't have the bloody two minute posting limit.

      Bzzt!

    12. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by andrewjhall · · Score: 1

      Bad news, your server has been reduced to a pool of smoking silicon.

      DSL hosted sites don't last long on slashdot...

    13. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 1


      It's up on Gnutella, search for the filename "LunarEclipse-10-2004.wmv" and "LunarEclipse-10-2004-2.wmv" - have put up two copies on two systems.

    14. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by ewithrow · · Score: 1

      Thank you much, now I have an excuse to take a break from my 2340 homework.

    15. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by mrokkam · · Score: 5, Informative

      On my univ bandwidth:) The Link Enjoy Mohan Yeah...I am up too:p

    16. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 1

      And yeah, I think GT servers have some kinda referral barring -- it works internally but gives a 404 otherwise.

      Surprising, but maybe the sysadmins were smart enough to forsee this kinda 'abuse' ;)

    17. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the torrent:
      http://tornado.ktu.lt:51121/torrents/Lun arEclipse- 10-2004.wmv.torrent?2755E9F5E661AD80FFDBE873B7346C BC55875B38
      hope this works well

    18. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 1

      Hahaha!

      You think tech's bad for undergrad? Wait until you get to gradschool ;)

      You're older, wiser and have more work. And less life ofcourse =)

      (ps - don't do gradschool here, there're no women)

    19. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by invisik · · Score: 1

      Your mirror rocks--I'm getting a full 28.6k/s down my cable. Oh. What? Seriously, thanks for mirroring.... Probably would have needed to wait until the next eclipse to have a chance at it again.

      -m

      --
      http://www.invisik.com
    20. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by metlin · · Score: 1

      Thanks :)

      I host my stuff at WebSytz - they used to be kinda mediocre a while ago, until they got bought over.

      Ever since, their service simply rocks :-)

      Kudos to them!!!

    21. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check out some of the other galleries... there's a lot of "interesting" photos in there. Ok, it's just pr0n, but it's still interesting

    22. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by phrostie · · Score: 1

      that one works.

      thank you

    23. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks!

    24. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

      Well the Gnutilla seems to be working great, excellent Idea.

      --
      I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    25. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      Man, you need a faster link! I only got 400kb/s, poor bastard =|

      (ps. thanks!)

    26. Re:Need more speed scotty!! by No+Panic · · Score: 1


      That one worked. Thanks !!

  2. cross-platform, please? by kanweg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    an mpeg version is appreciated.

    Bert

    1. Re:cross-platform, please? by mqRakkis · · Score: 1

      MPlayer plays it just fine.

    2. Re:cross-platform, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yeah? Well try playing it on non-x86 then. I don't know of any non-microsoft, or for that matter, non-binary, decoder that supports WMV3.

    3. Re:cross-platform, please? by big_groo · · Score: 1
      You run *nix and don't have mplayer ?!?

      PS. Don't forget the codecs, or you'll be recompiling again.

    4. Re:cross-platform, please? by fred911 · · Score: 1

      How 'bout it! Why would someone expend so much energy and time and release a .wmv? Explain please.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    5. Re:cross-platform, please? by ajs · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      mplayer fails to play it for me. Dunno what codec he used, but it's not one that my mplayer supports.

    6. Re:cross-platform, please? by big_groo · · Score: 1, Informative

      I have mplayer installed along with the firefox plugin for it - I can play the clip in either the browser, or on its own. You probably need to go get the full codec bundle, and recompile.

    7. Re:cross-platform, please? by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm running the pre-release 5 for 1.0 with all of the codecs that were provided. I don't think I want to go CVS just to view this one file. Perhaps the guy who made it in the first place could just save it in a different format.

      It's amazing how similar trying to view videos from a Windows system is to trying to view Word documents... you'd think it was the same monopoly trying to break standards in yet another field... oh wait...

    8. Re:cross-platform, please? by antdude · · Score: 1

      Bert, get MPlayer and the codecs.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    9. Re:cross-platform, please? by big_groo · · Score: 1, Informative
      I don't think I want to go CVS just to view this one file.

      You don't have to. You *do* have to download this package, extract to /usr/local/lib/codecs/ and then rebuild mplayer as usual. Read this.

    10. Re:cross-platform, please? by ajs · · Score: 1
      This is what I already have installed:
      mplayer-1.0pre5-2
      mplayer-codecs-essential-200407 04-1
      mplayer-codecs-win32-20040704-1
      mplayer-cod ecs-win32-qt-extras-20040704-1
      mplayer-common-1.0 pre5-2
      mplayer-gui-1.0pre5-2
      mplayer-skin-defaul t-1.4-1
      mplayer-skins-1.4-1.fr
      as downloaded from http://sunsite.icm.edu.pl/pub/linux/greysector/mpl ayer/downloads-optional.html. The codecs are installed under /usr/lib/codecs are you saying that if I install new codecs, the whole application has to be rebuilt?!
    11. Re:cross-platform, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm playing it on non-x86 just fine. g4 proc, windows media player for osx.
      -e

    12. Re:cross-platform, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And while recompiling it, remember to repeat the Linux mantra:

      "Linux is ready for prime time!"

    13. Re:cross-platform, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Debian user eh? You get to recompile anyway.

    14. Re:cross-platform, please? by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Or add "deb ftp://ftp.nerim.net/debian-marillat/ unstable main" to /etc/apt/sources.list and install mplayer from there. That repository also has DeCSS and all that fun stuff. Debian and Mandrake are extremely convenient for that sort of stuff, with the above repository for Debian and the PLF for Mandrake.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    15. Re:cross-platform, please? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'm running it on non-x86 you insensitive clod!

    16. Re:cross-platform, please? by Skapare · · Score: 1

      If the codecs are separate .so files, then there should be no need to rebuild mplayer. It should simply know where to find the codecs if the original application is designed properly (to the principle of modularity). The whole idea of modules is to be able to add or delete them as needed without rebuilding or reinstalling the whole thing.

      Of course, if the codecs are not too large and not too numerous, they could be statically linked into the executable and make it easier on everyone.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  3. BitTorrent? by pclinger · · Score: 3

    Someone please post up a torrent of this if you get it downloaded.

    --
    /. editors made it impossible to link to file:///c:/con/con in my sig. Please just type it in
    1. Re:BitTorrent? by mdecarle · · Score: 2, Funny
      /. editors made it impossible to link to file:///c:/con/con in my sig. Please just type it in your browser
      And right they are, your website is broken!

      Well, it didn't work on W2K + IE6, and file:///c:/CON gave me an 'Open With' dialog box. What program should I use?
    2. Re:BitTorrent? by paganizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've not only put up a torrent, i've posted it in non-evil formats.
      tracker at (until it starts smoking) http://66.38.8.41:6969
      ED2K:
      ed2k://|file|LunarE clipse-10-2004_DivX.avi|2077802 |8605d30fc200576a8dde819ee6d936c0|/
      ed2k://|file| LunarEclipse-10-2004.mpg|5391332|533d 94a75a2e807dccd56a91d40b26cc|/
      ed2k://|file|Lunar Eclipse-10-2004.mov|6930342|c712 88ac9c70e7e02b9bb7dc8bc08b44|/
      ed2k://|file|Lunar Eclipse-10-2004.wmv|4731422|1840 7e7807f0f841ff0e6be84a397416|/

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    3. Re:BitTorrent? by Azchar111 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the BitTorrent. I like your disclaimer. Watching my client, I don't see much upload activity at this time. (9:14 am EST) Bill

      --
      Caveat Lector.
    4. Re:BitTorrent? by fimbulvetr · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you already knew, but doing this on win9x (and me) causes a bsod. Same thing with c:\nul\nul

    5. Re:BitTorrent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ed2k://|file|LunarEclipse-10-2004.mov|6930342|c712 88ac9c70e7e02b9bb7dc8bc08b44|/

      Excellent! Lets trade one crappy, proprietary format for another!

  4. Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dead at 3 posts not even time to mirror

    1. Re:Dead by metlin · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm a subscriber and the server was dead even when it was for subscribers-only - I was hardly getting 1 KBPS.

      It would be nice if some of the others who've gotten it would provide a mirror :-/

  5. .torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would be neat if you would have thrown a .torrent instead. Your server was bound to die within seconds of confirmation anyhow.

    1. Re:.torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

      Except for the problem with only offering torrents is for people that are eitehr stuck on a university network where they watch(and I don't want to have to talk to IT and attend a copyright/bandwidth seminar, doesn't mater if I was using a P2P app (and yes their tracking software does identify that it is BitTorrent, and if it is another P2P (IE Kazaa or whatever) the BW is 3KB/s for the entire campus), I worked last semester answering phones and having to explain to about 50% of the callers why their internet was shutoff and what they would have to do to get it back on(of which about 50% of that were copyright violations, the other 50% were virus/worm/spam related) or if you are stuck behind a firewall on an ISP which is blocking torrents or other P2P apps. (I have a friend whose problem is that with the internet into their apartment, it is a wireless link by an ISP to the complex, and then the ISP has ethernet jacks in their rooms(connected to a managed switch so they can turn them on and off). They are all masq'd and he says nothing is working).

    2. Re:.torrent by gomiam · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is, when you are NATed or have incoming connections filtered, you are _still_ able to make outgoing connections. If I can get 100KB/s down and up with only outgoing Bittorrent connections, perhaps there is something else if you can't.

    3. Re:.torrent by ceedee99uk · · Score: 3, Informative

      The BitTorrent protocol was specifically *designed* for the rapid, near-simultaneous distribution of popular files to a large number of users -- who are then able to share them via other methods successfully avoiding the usual /. effect.
      Surely that makes sense regardless of the efforts of some university networks and ISPs to prevent the use of torrents?

  6. Slow by cuteseal · · Score: 3, Funny

    By the time this gets downloaded, it will be time for the next lunar eclipse...

  7. bah by invisik · · Score: 1

    I got nothin'. Who is watching it right now that is tossing this guys server already? Mirror that puppy!

    -m

    --
    http://www.invisik.com
  8. For my next clip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Using my Ultra HighSpeed Cameras, you'll be able to see *in slow motion!* a server go up in flames as it gets /.ed...

  9. People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nothing works better & faster.

    Coral p2p cached version here

    1. Re:People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah.. a whole 1.7kb/s. :P

    2. Re:People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by baryon351 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to be negative, but I'm going to be negative anyway. Wtf is with these coral cache links? has ANYONE managed to get them working quicker than the original site? I'm getting 2.5kb/sec from the original article poster's server while this cache crap is lucky to spike to 500bytes/second.

      Is it meant to be a serious caching service? Or are we just slashdotting some poor moron's dsl line here?

    3. Re:People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by jesser · · Score: 1

      The parent's link is completely fucked. Slashdot stripped the slashes from the link and added a space to the link text. To follow the link, copy the text (not the link) and remove the space before giving it to a P2P client.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    4. Re:People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by Sinner · · Score: 1

      Never bloody works for me at all.

      --
      fish and pipes
    5. Re:People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by excaliber19 · · Score: 1

      Its not about the speed, but the fact that they can handle the load. Coral Cache isn't going to get slashdotted. It might be slow, but the site is still up. Dont use it to download movies. Doh.

    6. Re:People People... Coral Cache to the rescue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, it doesn't work!

  10. In the dead of night... by LaserBeams · · Score: 1

    Zero comments, and it's already dead. Well, not completely dead. I'm getting about 1KB/minute. Thanks for at least warning us that your server wouldn't last long.

    You're a brave poster, poster. *salutes*

    We definitely need some more pre-emptive slashdotting features. *votes for automatic torrents*

    --
    Karma: \Kar"ma\, n. [Skr.] (Buddhism) One's acts considered as fixing one's lot in the future existence.
    1. Re:In the dead of night... by argent · · Score: 1

      votes for automatic torrents

      Can someone point me to a decent torrent proxy?

    2. Re:In the dead of night... by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Its already on Gnutella

    3. Re:In the dead of night... by argent · · Score: 1

      Its already on Gnutella

      Someone want to point me to a decent gnutella proxy then? :)

  11. wmv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    hmm...aren't you supposed to post movies in a non-evil format?

    1. Re:wmv by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      video lan client has a great codec for wmv - no problemo. it's what the free MS video editing software saves as for a file anyways. either way, an mp4 format would have been nice.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:wmv by argent · · Score: 2, Informative

      video lan client has a great codec for wmv

      Yeh? Care to tell my copy of VLC where the -ing hell it is?

      main: no suitable decoder module for fourcc `WMV3'.
      VLC probably does not support this sound or video format.


      (and WM Player on my Mac dropped all but about 12 random frames... yeh, it's only a G4/466 but sheesh, it plays DVDs full screen without complaining...)

    3. Re:wmv by zecg · · Score: 1

      But this one plays for sure!!!11!!

      --
      .i lu doi ringos.star. xu do puku'aroroi dunli dopecaku leni virnu li'u
    4. Re:wmv by v1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      WMV3 codec is M$ proprietary, and is ONLY found in the Windows Media Player FOR WINDOWS. Not even the Macintosh release of WMP has this codec. You can also forget VLC, Mplayer, QuickTime, and any other player for that matter. WMP for Windows ONLY.

      It never ceases to amaze me how many ppl post videos encoded with this codec, because there are so many ppl out there that have absolutely NO way to view it.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:wmv by Spetiam · · Score: 1

      My VLC has trouble with it because it wants it to have an "ASF" extension.

    6. Re:wmv by wdd1040 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Worked fine in Mplayer with the codec pack on SUSE 9.1.

      --
      wdd
    7. Re:wmv by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      WMP for osx does in fact play the file. It runs choppy on my computer (i have a slow 550mhz g4), but it does play.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    8. Re:wmv by amokk · · Score: 1

      Install windows, it'll work great.

      --
      I think, therefore I am an Atheist.
  12. To all those complaining about speed by Smerity · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Really, 1 Kbps is not that bad considering it's only a 4 meg file, pretend you're on 56k, or hell, just go outside!

    You've got other things to do than read Slashdot... Right? *cough cough*

    1. Re:To all those complaining about speed by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      1KB/s is slow even for 56k.

    2. Re:To all those complaining about speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except I could usually maintain about 4-5KB/sec on a 56K(assuming my brother wasn't downloading game demos/patches/maps/mods or otherwise sucking up the link). 1KB/sec is more like 9600.

    3. Re:To all those complaining about speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1KB/sec is more like 9600.

      Or a 56K on less than optimal conditions.

    4. Re:To all those complaining about speed by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      or hell, just go outside!

      We're dowloading crappy video of a lunar eclipse. Clearly, "going outside" is not something we're even considering.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  13. The moon is a myth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't let them fool you. The moon is actually a giant man-made light spot to help spy satellites watch your every moves. Lunar eclipses are just a pretext made up to change the batteries.

    1. Re:The moon is a myth! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      But if it's such a powerful spotlight, won't all the cheese melt?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:The moon is a myth! by metlin · · Score: 1, Insightful


      No, because it's cold in outer space.

      Tsk, tsk.

    3. Re:The moon is a myth! by Asprin · · Score: 2, Funny


      Whoever modded this "interesting" I want you in my office NOW!

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    4. Re:The moon is a myth! by balster+neb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Incredible! You got modded Informative, Insightful, and Interesting for that.

      Here is what happened to the Mods who modded you:

      Informative: actually beleived you, and now think the moon is really a giant man-made light spot to help spy satellites watch their every move.

      Interseting: will raise this as a conversation topic in the next party they go to.

      Insightful: suddenly got new perspective on a lot of things in the world. Rethought their life after understanding this profound point of view.

      I really pity these guys :)

      And also, to demonstrate the how common bad moderating is, see this:

      Moderators! You must mod this informative!

      There, now let me sit back and laugh. :)

    5. Re:The moon is a myth! by Draknek · · Score: 1, Informative

      The joke's on you; you got modded offtopic.

      (Go on, mod me informative. You know you want to.)

      --
      Self-referential sigs do not a humourous poster make.
    6. Re:The moon is a myth! by sat1308 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yup, this is insightful in the sense that Slashdot's moderators though that this was insighful...instead of funny

      Really gives me an insight into Slashdot's moderating system!!!

      Now if only I get to meta-moderate this...

    7. Re:The moon is a myth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      insightfull?!

    8. Re:The moon is a myth! by Zardus · · Score: 1

      That's not a giant moon spotlight, its a space station!

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
  14. Death of a server... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The download rates will plummet due to hoardes of Slashdotters eagerly, *altruistically* downloading the movie so they can be the first to seed a Torrent so the server will stay up.

    Really.

  15. Coral isn't even working, nor mirrordot! by notthepainter · · Score: 3, Informative
    You know, this is getting really annoying. We have the technology available to prevent slashdotting sites yet the editors insist on not using it.

    Then again, neither coral nor mirrordot has the movie, so maybe the editors know what they are doing!

    1. Re:Coral isn't even working, nor mirrordot! by imemyself · · Score: 1

      Awww, but that would take the fun outta reading slashdot.

      --
      Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
    2. Re:Coral isn't even working, nor mirrordot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand how coral works.

      It doesn't *magically* have a copy of web content on its own. For it to mirror something, you need to actively add it to the system by linking to it through the coral proxy first. This will allow the coral system to obtain a copy from the original and then store its internal copy for mirroring.

      If the original gets slashdotted BEFORE requesting it through coral, then coral is just like anybody else. It can't retrieve its copy, as the original no longer is responding ... therefore it never is able to obtain a copy to mirror.

      To use it effectively, you need to link using coral BEFORE the slashdot effect. That way it gets its copy before getting slashdotted. Even if you don't actively use the coral link in the submission, slashdot should request links from each story from the coral system just prior to making the story live. That would make it so that if the site gets slashdotted there would have been a request submitted to coral before the slashdotting and would help others get the content later on.

    3. Re:Coral isn't even working, nor mirrordot! by ajs · · Score: 1

      The article specifically tells you how to get it via Gnutella. My download is working just fine. Gnutella is at least as powerful as BT these days, and the GUIs are, IMHO, far better (I use gtk-gnutella out of CVS).

      Give it a shot.

  16. i hate to be redundant by the_unknown_soldier · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but this desperately needs a torrent! common people, someone who has it make a torrent file!

    1. Re:i hate to be redundant by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I am unable to agree more.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  17. Torrent here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://220.113.166.98:5959/torrents/LunarEclipse-1 0-2004.wmv.torrent?786012098E6142BC3D88EBCBD26CEEE 924142BBC

  18. gnutella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already found 5 hosts serving it in Gnutella

  19. Try Gnutella! by Atomic+Fro · · Score: 1

    I got the 4 meg file pretty easily off of gnutella using Limewire Pro. Downloaded at 40k/sex.

    I am sure there is a lot of potential here, but at least the file on gnutella has way too much compression. Couldn't really make the moon out except as it came out of eclipse as maybe 10-12 very white pixels.

    I was using Windows Media Player for mac, so maybe that has something to do with it.

    --

    ==================
    Hippie Logger Jock
    ==================
    1. Re:Try Gnutella! by SharpFang · · Score: 4, Funny

      Downloaded at 40k/sex.

      They call it "Freudian typo".

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Try Gnutella! by metlin · · Score: 1

      They call it "Freudian typo".

      But... I don't see your mother anywhere? :-(

      *rimshot*

    3. Re:Try Gnutella! by b374 · · Score: 1
      40k/sex

      if that's USD then this is way too expensive for the average /.er ...
    4. Re:Try Gnutella! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      40,000 bytes per sex? Might I suggest getting your significant other a chew toy?

    5. Re:Try Gnutella! by bcmm · · Score: 1

      No, not that video.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    6. Re:Try Gnutella! by TyrranzzX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Downloaded at 40k/sex.

      They call it "Freudian typo".


      I'd call it a very expensive hooker myself...

    7. Re:Try Gnutella! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard such a thing described as: "A Freudian slip is when you say one thing but mean your mother."

    8. Re:Try Gnutella! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the fact that these days I am not getting any sex I am downloading at Nan K/sex

  20. Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by indie1982 · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://lenore.newmeja.com/LunarEclipse-10-2004.wmv

    I'll be taking the file down at the end of the day becuase it's a server at work and i'll need the bandwidth back tomorrow ;o)

    Good luck!

    Rich

    1. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by VGh0st · · Score: 2, Funny

      After catching a cold because of falling asleep while waiting for the eclipse on the roof of my apartment, I'd really appreciate a fast mirror to watch the whole thing.

    2. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks, that video is downloadin at 60kb much better than .2

    3. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by indie1982 · · Score: 1
      NP, the server seems to be (insert kiss of death here) holding out OK

      Currently averaging 3 MB/sec!

      Rich

    4. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by morbider · · Score: 3, Informative

      LunarEclipse.mp4 can now be downloaded (2.5Mb). Original WMV converted to Apple Quicktime MP4 format via AVI. Academic hosted server, so bandwidth should be okay. Will have to remove tomorrow (Monday 1st Nov, 1600GMT).

    5. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by herko_cl · · Score: 1

      Cool! Thank you very much. A non-slashdotted mirror... what is the world coming to?

      --
      No .sig for you! ONE YEAR!
    6. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by nigham · · Score: 1

      Also mirrored on: www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~anshulni/LunarEclipse-10-2004 .zip

      --
      I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    7. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      danka :)

    8. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks

    9. Re:Dare I say it... there's a mirror here... by Kagenin · · Score: 1

      Hey, thanks for mirroring this, looks like the dude's server is crushed already.

      --
      "All warfare is based on deception."
      Sun Tzu, "The Art of War"
  21. Torrent by alwsn · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here it is, hopefully my connection will survie handing out the torrent. here

    1. Re:Torrent by SelFix · · Score: 3, Informative

      another one too
      LunarEclipse-10-2004.wmv

    2. Re:Torrent by boringgit · · Score: 1

      Well Done that man!

      Only trouble is, after spending 20 minutes trying to download the darn thing I am now expecting nothing short of 2001: A Space Odyssey!

      Cheers for going to the trouble anyhow!

  22. Hmm not that impressive. by nekrecart · · Score: 5, Informative

    Downloaded it from gnutella and sharing. Video is pretty lame. A small dot is just fading in and that's about it.

    1. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Small dot?

      Thats onea them government UFOs!

      Really, they're planning to strike against a Taliban base on Saturn!

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      I agree. This is some weak-ass shit. The pics I took with my sorry-ass camera w/o a tripod looked better. This guy just wanted to see if his server could withstand a slashdotting.

    3. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by miknight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's just a small white dot moving along the sky. It isn't really worth watching.

    4. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Lusa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Should give him some credit. He did the work, froze his butt off (probably in a car though) and it was baseball night! I think he was trying for more of a moon rising over the bridge artistic shot than showing off the eclipse properly but it turned out too dark which is probably due to inexperience.

      I'd have tried that with a digital camera using interval shots and a graduated filter to allow better exposure of the ground and maybe keep some of the moons featues visible rather than making it look like a torch pen on the end of a fishing rod.

      Still, some credit is due for trying.

    5. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > Still, some credit is due for trying.

      OK, I briefly stopped farting in his general direction.

    6. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No points for trying.. the real world doesn't reward "effort" or "attempts".. It rewards results.. and this video stinks.

    7. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      I think the neat part of this video is what looks like an airport in the background... Lots of little dots move toward the ground to one spot, with lots of other little dots moving back up into the sky... It looks pretty neat in time lapse!

      For those who want to see some really awesome time lapse, I highly recommend the film Koyaanisqatsi.

    8. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by anethema · · Score: 1

      Jesus its not that bad, kind of neet to see the moon come out of eclipse like that. He did all this work just to show you guys something he thought was neet and you cut him down.

      I wouldnt say simply stunning but I wouldnt say its 'pretty lame' either.

      Try constructive criticism or none at all.

      That beeing said, my constructive criticism is..dont shoot something as small as the moon with a wide angle lense. It would have been okay to see less of the city to see more of the moon apear. Keep it up, not all of us are assholes.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    9. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by mr_snarf · · Score: 1

      I agree. I actually thought it was kind of neat.

      --
      printf("Goodbye cruel world!\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b\b");
    10. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      While it might not be that great, I took this picture(s) on my balcony in Ottawa. You might like it more.

      http://www.deviantart.com/view/11794545/

      Set the camera up on a tripod and let it do all the work. :)

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    11. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now this is what I was expecting from the slashdot post. But then with some motion going on... Nice work ;-)

    12. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's 100 times better than the stupid video. Great job!

    13. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very nice

    14. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by l810c · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Infinately cooler than the video. And it doesn't even move. How many gigs of bandwidth were wasted on the video?

    15. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by pomakis · · Score: 1
      Awesome photo!

      Here's a photo I took of the eclipse (coincidently also in Ottawa, and also with a Canon PowerShot G3). It's not a timelapse composite, but I think it's still pretty neat:

      http://www.pomakis.com/tmpPhotos/img2004102700.jpg

    16. Re:Hmm not that impressive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that. At least this guy had the idea and put some effort into it. How about some constructive criticism:

      First the obvious: the way you can see the moon move in context (i.e. city lights, etc) is nice, but a narrower field of view would have been nice. Since video cameras with fancy lenses are really expensive, I'd suggest using a still camere with a telephoto lense. Still, you need a serious lense to get the moon to be a decent sive in your picture; give the guy some credit.

      The less obvious: The full moon is an object in direct sunlight and needs the same sort of exposure as pictures outdoors on a sunny day. The fully eclipsed moon, on the other hand, is less well lit than the nighttime city. (The more I think about this, the more difficult I realize it would have been to get it right.) So... You need to slowly adjust you exposure from way more exposure that you camera's auto more suggests, to way, way, way less exposure than the auto-exposure suggests, but you need to keep the transition smooth and consistant so that the moon still looks right (i.e. smoothly goes from dark-but-visible to bright but not overexposed). Of course this will cause the city lights to transition from overexposed to completely invisible, so I'd suggest taking the city lights from one picture and compositing them into all the rest.

      I still enjoyed your video; better luck next time.

  23. Eclipse of the server by noidentity · · Score: 2

    I'd like to see a video of the eclipse of the server hosting the video of the eclipse. It happened so fast I doubt it would need to be sped up either. Only problem is finding a server to host it, once the server sees the video and cringes.

  24. here is the torrent by SelFix · · Score: 1

    hope it works:

    http://tornado.ktu.lt:51121/torrents/LunarEclips e- 10-2004.wmv.torrent?2755E9F5E661AD80FFDBE873B7346C BC55875B38

  25. Here's a torrent by jerde · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a torrent of the movie.

    I hope it gets seeded soon, I'm not sure how long I can keep my copy open.

    --
    INsigNIFICANT
    1. Re:Here's a torrent by ftyczka · · Score: 1

      Enjoy.

      http://149.156.146.70/~jps/LunarEclipse-10-2004. wm v

    2. Re:Here's a torrent by ftyczka · · Score: 1

      Sorry 'bout that, here's the link again:

      http://149.156.146.70/~jps/LunarEclipse-10-2004.wm v

    3. Re:Here's a torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working great! Downloaded it in less than 2 minutes.

    4. Re:Here's a torrent by jerde · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Simply amazing. 100 seconds after posting, the first people started grabbing the torrent. Now 20 minutes later it's fully seeded by dozens of people. Gosh, I love bittorrent.

      --
      INsigNIFICANT
    5. Re:Here's a torrent by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Tracker refresh is set to a half hour on the torrent I'm on. Pathetic for a small torrent like this.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    6. Re:Here's a torrent by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      50 seeds and two peers.... come on guys... how the heck am I gonna get to 1:1 ration??? I hate leeching... but sometimes, you don't get a chance to give it back...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  26. I founds something more impressive on the video by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    ...like the planes taking off from the airport. Watching them all zipping off into the sky on a virtual highway is quite amazing I think.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  27. Captured in a single image... by Animaether · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those not willing to wait for the movie download, or don't care for a movie, or are waiting for an MPG format version or whatever...

    Lunar Eclipse caught in a single image
    ( Thanks to cozzy for the URL )

    1. Re:Captured in a single image... by metlin · · Score: 0

      W O W

      That was simply fabulous! Quite breathtaking.

      Mods, please mod parent up - brilliant image, thank you.

    2. Re:Captured in a single image... by jeff+munkyfaces · · Score: 1

      that's great - thanks!

    3. Re:Captured in a single image... by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That is truly awesome!!

      This http://www.deviantart.com/view/11794545/ (As I've pimped in another post) is what I was able to take from my balcony in Ottawa.

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    4. Re:Captured in a single image... by DarkBlackFox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here's a few I took through my 8" reflector scope. Not as good as I'd have liked, but for a little crappy point n' shoot 1.3mp camera, it wasn't bad. Funny thin was a real nice 5mp camera I had ordered the previous week came in the day after the eclipse. If I had that, they'd have been much more impressive. (Apologies for the Earthlink'ed space, but my main server has very limited bandwith.. if anyone feels like mirroring please do.)

      Moon 1
      Moon 2
      Moon 3 (my personal favorite)
      Moon 4
      Moon 5
      Moon 6
      Moon 7

    5. Re:Captured in a single image... by twistedcubic · · Score: 1

      AWESOME!

    6. Re:Captured in a single image... by Chris+Huelsbeck · · Score: 1

      ...maybe a bit late for this thread, but here's a picture I took: http://www.huelsbeck.com/pics/lunar_eclipse.jpg

  28. This one has seeds, parent's tracker is down by EMIce · · Score: 1

    This one has seeds. Parent had 0 seeds

  29. What a POS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was no Lunar Eclipse.

  30. Re:shut your cake hole, poopsniffer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your rage is actually self-directed, and stems from your experience of a poor quality, propriatary codec in a closed encapsulation format.

    Come to the light, little one.

  31. Wide Angle Lens - DOH! by tcpaulh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Totally Lame. What's the point of shoting a lunar eclipse at wide angle?

    1. Re:Wide Angle Lens - DOH! by metlin · · Score: 1

      Dump the video into Premier, accelerate it 200x to just 37 seconds, and the resulting video is IMHO simply stunning.

      Awww come on all you guys, don't break the poor guy's heart.

      Who am I kidding?! That video is quite lame :-/

    2. Re:Wide Angle Lens - DOH! by the_quark · · Score: 1

      I believe it's so he didn't have to move the camera to keep the moon tracked.

    3. Re:Wide Angle Lens - DOH! by tcpaulh · · Score: 1

      erm, what moon?

  32. Anyone else pissed off... by SharpFang · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...about promoting DRM in WMV format? Come on, there's so many open-source or open-source-friendly formats and you must pick the one Microsoft has introduced especially so they could support DRM?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Anyone else pissed off... by argent · · Score: 1

      Hey, they didn't encrypt the movie.

      My gripe with WMV is that Microsoft's media player for OS X sucks the eclipsed moon through quantum wormholes. Real, too... hey guys, there's no blkoody reason a media player can't use native widgets. Yeh, yeh, I know Apple started it with Quicktime 4, but there's no reason to copy a bad idea even if Apple does implicitly say it's OK this time.

      [metal delenda est]

    2. Re:Anyone else pissed off... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes.
      Where is wmvdmod.dll source?

    3. Re:Anyone else pissed off... by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      Does Windows Media Player for OSX really suck, or did he forget to take the lens cap off?

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
  33. Re:Worst movie EVAR! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, looking at what people here have to say about this movie, I think there are two problems. One, some people have no tolerance for pure entertainment. Not every movie has to explore the depths of humanity, and teach us new things about ourselves. Some of the greatest movies aver hardly do that. It promises no plot, no characters, little reason to care, etc. It does promise all the visceral pleasures you can get your fill of, if you're up to it. And on that level, it aims, and hits the target with style. I wouldn't see it more than a couple times, I wouldn't buy it except to test my DVD surround setup, but I do find much of it to be decent escapist fun. And then some of it is also extremely boring.

  34. Is it just me, or... by UberDork · · Score: 1

    Does this look like a police helicopter?

  35. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you! Sadly I missed the eclipse by one hour >:(

  36. lame! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What a waste of bandwidth. Huge video file and it looks like someone pulled a tarp off a streetlight ten blocks away. This is best the Slashdot editors could find in the slush pile?

  37. Ideal use of Coral and FreeCache... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 1

    ...for those unable to setup a Torrent, but they're still not being used. :/

    1. Re:Ideal use of Coral and FreeCache... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The banner ads that run at the top of these Slashdot pages are more interesting than that video. Fire tonight's Slashdot editor; he's obviously drinking on the job. :-/

  38. openssl base64 -e LunarEclipse-10-2004.torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here is the torrent, base64-encoded. Paste it into a file, and do: sed -e 's/ //g' < file > other_file && openssl base64 -d < other_file > LunarEclipse-10-2004.torrent

    ZDg6YW5ub3VuY2U0MD podHRwOi8vdHJhY2tlci55b3VjZWZmLmNvbTo2OTY5L2Fu
    bm 91bmNlNDppbmZvZDY6bGVuZ3RoaTQ3MzE0MjJlNDpuYW1lMjQ6 THVuYXJFY2xp
    cHNlLTEwLTIwMDQud212MTI6cGllY2UgbGVu Z3RoaTI2MjE0NGU2OnBpZWNlczM4
    MDpJv+V7R50e/Q5hT95C wjwhnckAcqinbIgbCqlCjYR4wwMUuuB4RYq7AWWFwfD4
    0PC3 SQY5kISxd27sQd6OblUBgIbNcDd8qUCZ3rIu1LFkORhQ2PGXB2 gHnLRyrho4
    CkCJ1HyliS7r4SZIrLz4302TIIP5Ncg3Rjb/bw lbNgAMRO5+DM8+rDMcpwTIfU1f
    NQLBYgGFdSgp/9p22CJla2 duORmBISnRjVFzK4uDXSTdxubJpA4exksAEK2v7bUd
    QHoNc4 iCa++z+/UIKBYjum5slP2Vjc481IWR34ujJvc2lEI+uBDbXdBN tp7KK9/w
    VySv8NeF3nW9kfc9cJxxP7zAPr58dOoM+bkQRCG/ tK5QY1HomNZeBTw3IJD/CJG8
    D069mZtDh68RzCXYn3dosvll Hlz7CA9Zw0vHCtWiFb2DqyopcYIb4NgzYwBbxoOw
    h58M4A6E qoXqbsIqBba9npv83avdcbDiAcPMP1YCZyy7DQsZu9lxS8J3uE zyTWVl

  39. Waste of time by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Downloaded and watched it. Blurry, indistinct and uninteresting. A complete waste of time. Which of course makes it perfectly appropriate for Slashdot :)

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    1. Re:Waste of time by janwedekind · · Score: 1
      Does anyone know about a Hall of Shame for the worst astronomical pictures :-D ?

      No honestly: A quick motion video of the city would've been much more interesting (with this kind of optical equipment).

    2. Re:Waste of time by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the video is total crap. This, on the other hand, is cool.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  40. in case you can't get the vid by LiquidMind · · Score: 5, Funny

    here's a summary

    ......oooooo0000000OOOOOOO

    --
    This sig contains repetition and redundancy.
  41. RTFM... there's a time-lapse feature for TRV17 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Care to read the manual next time, instead of having to accelerate it in Premiere?

  42. Server is down already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So heres a summary ......oooooo0000000OOOOOOO0000000Ooooooo......

    1. Re:Server is down already by kamukwam · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you are doing it all wrong... Of course it should be: ...OOOOOOOOO00000000oooooooo00000000OOOOOOOO...

  43. Good concept! by Shag · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Kinda need more zoom (500mm is good for most kinds of eclipses, I think), though. A nice telescope with a guider on it would work wonders for this sort of thing.

    Another timelapse of the same eclipse, from 2400 miles WSW of San Francisco, is at http://www.astroday.net/LunarEclipse.html in QuickTime format... I hope my friend doesn't mind the slashdotting. Still not much in the way of telephoto or zoom, but nifty cloud patterns and stuff.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
    1. Re:Good concept! by scottfl · · Score: 1
      500mm was definitely the way to go. I just wish their wasn't so much cloud cover in South Florida that night. I took this series of pictures with a Sigma 500mm lens on my Canon 10d.

      http://www.powercycle.net/home/gallery/pompano/200 4eclipse_001

  44. Correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I meant: sed -e 's/ //g' < file | openssl base64 -d > LunarEclipse-10-2004.torrent

  45. Even rarer... by rirugrat · · Score: 3, Funny
    Start with a relatively rare occurrence, the complete lunar eclipse from last Wednesday.

    Even rarer...the Boston Red Sox won the World Series!

    (Does anyone have a BitTorrent of THAT?!?)

    1. Re:Even rarer... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even call total lunar eclipses rare. We had 2 last year, and 2 this year. For a metereological event to be rare, it should be something more like once in a lifetime.

      --
      What?
  46. And here's the ed2k link by Mika_Lindman · · Score: 1
  47. Another HTTP Mirror by tidewaterblues · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is another mirror, for those who care to use it.

    --


    ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
    1. Re:Another HTTP Mirror by tidewaterblues · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, and one of that QT movie too.

      --


      ...En að Besta Sem Guð Hefur Skapað Er Nýr Dagur
    2. Re:Another HTTP Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now THAT'S more like it!

  48. Trippy! by argent · · Score: 1

    Nice video, it'd be cooler without the eclipse and eclipse watchers distracting you from the clouds. All it needs is some Phillip Glass music (or maybe early Floyd) and a nice long loop...

    Yeh...

    Trippy...

  49. Not worth it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The video is just a point of light moving across the sky. You can't even tell it's an eclipse, it just starts out dark and gets brighter. Seems they didn't even capture the whole eclipse. And I don't see those planes someone said they could see taking off. Video doesn't even have it's levels set properly. Skip it.

    1. Re:Not worth it. by teh*fink · · Score: 1

      you're totally right. i downloaded the mp4 and mov versions that people posted and couldn't see ANY MOON AT ALL...

      --
      "I DARE you to make less sense!"
  50. vlc and WMV3 by hweimer · · Score: 1

    video lan client has a great codec for wmv - no problemo.

    [00000226] main decoder error: no suitable decoder module for fourcc `WMV3'.
    VLC probably does not support this sound or video format.

    --
    OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  51. The moon, eh? :-) by Compact+Dick · · Score: 5, Funny

    The "Moon": A Ridiculous Liberal Myth -- by 70%

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

    1. Re:The moon, eh? :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick google shows:

      http://www.4w8w.com/bookcashford1.html

      The earliest record of the Moon and her cycles is attributed to humans in the Paleolithic age, when it was used to measure lengths of time greater than 24 hours.

      Cashford brings her readers into a discussion of modern day associations with the moon via the past, including the moon's control over the ocean's tides: the Hindu moon god Soma was called "lord of the waters;" in Ancient Rome the moon's phases were linked to the weather; and 1500 years later Markham in The English Husbandman linked the moon to rain.

      Apparently people did make note of it before 1950.

    2. Re:The moon, eh? :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts are for those liberal ealite east coast intellectuals. All you really need to do is listen to God!

    3. Re:The moon, eh? :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      I simply refuse to put up with limp, Satanic, fellow-travelling shit like this piece of sub-human garbage in your pewling, idiotic post[?]:

      "Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) "

      Let's count the errors, shall we?
      • The Earth does not "rotate". If it did, we would all be blown around ten ways to Tuesday by the winds created.
      • If the Earth did rotate, then one would expect to see tornadoes in the area at the centre of rotation. This would imply that Kansas is the centre of the Earth, a thought pleasing to my personal sympathies, but contradicted by scripture. There has never been a tornado in Jerusalem
      • Joshua asked Our Lord to stop the Sun, you ignorant asshole, not the Earth. What possible good would it have done to stop the Earth from moving?
      • Your blasphemous statement that the Moon "reflects" light from the Sun directly contradicts Genesis 3:16, in which it is made perfectly clear that "he created the moon, that the slimy crawling things by night might see". Which part of "he created", don't you understand? Your pathetic advocacy of the fraudulent theory (and it IS a THEORY, not some bourgeois, East-Coast elitist idea of a "fact") is sickening.

      Your evil whinings are, quite frankly, tantamount to liberalism.
    4. Re:The moon, eh? :-) by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Oh, you're Patrick Draper?

    5. Re:The moon, eh? :-) by naoursla · · Score: 1

      Those 'liberals' aren't too far off mark about the guns bit:

      http://www.shotspotter.com/index.shtml

  52. Red Dot by gunpowda · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else find the flickering red dot more interesting than the tiny view of the moon?

    1. Re:Red Dot by imbaczek · · Score: 1

      Um, yeah, kind of.

  53. Interesting, but not great. *Here* is great. by wherley · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This shot really makes you appreciate the lunar surface and appearance during eclipse.

    And this timelapse video shows what can be done in that arena.

  54. Wide angle lens? by Underholdning · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why use a 30mm wide angle lens when a 300mm zoom would've been more appropriate?
    I've seen the movie, and the other comments are correct - it's just a dot that appears and fades away.
    It would have been much better if he'd used a zoom lens, unless I'm missing something?

    1. Re:Wide angle lens? by elgatozorbas · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It would have been much better if he'd used a zoom lens, unless I'm missing something?

      While I agree that the movie could have been better, there is a simple explanation for the lens used (apart from the fact that it may have been the only one available): using a zoom lens would require you to move the camera. While this is a burden to do at night (instead of just letting the camera run on its own), it would also be far from trivial to follow a smooth curve, especially when you don't know exactly where the moon is going. In other words, a zoom lens would have resulted in a very sharp, but very shaky movie. The guy gave it a good shot, next time may be better...

      Z

    2. Re:Wide angle lens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he has years to practice.

      The next total eclipse of the moon will not be until March 2007.

      http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/national/index.ss f? /base/national-2/1099013651273602.xml&storylist=na tional

    3. Re:Wide angle lens? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      Not as difficult as you might think. This is what an equatorial mount on a telescope does, in conjunction with a worm drive. It will keep the same spot in the sky in the same place.

      Here's a link.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  55. sage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shit sucks, saged

  56. Update the lameness filter by boffy_b · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why does this exact post get put up every time anything involving a torrent is mentioned? If the poser wasn't AC I'd presume t'was karma whoring, is it in fact some kind of subtle troll joke? Shouldn't stuff like this be blocked along with "frist p0st"

    --
    Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.
  57. Lame by gerardrj · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This video is lame. It's not worthy of an effort by a geek.
    My impression is that the person who shot the video accidentally recorded the eclipse and was really just wanting to make a time-lapse of the SF skyline and bridge.

    For the first half of the clip I couldn't even tell where the moon was, I kept focusing on the red blinky light on the bridge.

    Lame, Lame, Lame.

    Full marks for the attempt though. Next time skip the wide-angle, or better yet use a long lens or a low power (20x) scope with motor drive. -- I would have done this, but I had prior plans that excluded my tending to the security of the rig.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  58. WOAH! by Sinner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That is WAY BETTER than the lameass vid that prompted this article. The editors should add it to the blurb.

    --
    fish and pipes
  59. Not the best by bobthemuse · · Score: 1

    While this is kind of neat, I wish he'd used a better lens to focus solely on the moon (obviously adds the requirement that he track it through the sky). During parts of the eclipse, the moon was dim enough to make out different features with a 20x lens, no special filters or anything. You could see the line of light move across the face. Really pretty neat. Wish I'd recorded this, anybody do something similar?

  60. How cold was it?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Freeze your butt off? In San Francisco???

    Drop by the Midwest or Northeast about January 10th to see what "freeze your butt off" really means.

  61. Someone else's movie by scattol · · Score: 1

    Here is a zoomed in movie . That's probably more what people were expecting. It doesn't have the wide angle scenic view, just the moon Pretty nice.

    1. Re:Someone else's movie by tektrix · · Score: 1

      Somehow, that looks like a Photoshop eclipse. Where's the cool red color? At least the vid *looked* authentic.

  62. Don't download this! by nimid · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's a waste of 4MB of bandwidth!

    The video is so poor, the first time you watch it you stare at a blinking light to the centre right of the screen thinking it's the moon (blinking as an artifact of the timelapse).

    Check out the pic someone posted above. It's far more interesting. Link from poster above for convenience: http://www.digitalastro.net/20041027_Lunar_Eclipse _time-lapse.jpg

    --
    A hundred and twenty characters ought to be enough for anyone...
  63. Photography 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously...a wide angle lens is exactly the opposite of the lens you should use to record a tiny distant object, especially considering the relatively poor resolution of a miniDV video camera.

  64. WTF by mkop · · Score: 1

    How did this even make on here. The video was horrible to look at, and just an all around waste of time

  65. Anybody else find it amusing by xf · · Score: 1

    That 80% of the posts here are on mirroring the movie, how slow the downloads are, et al, instead of the actual content?

  66. *yawn* by rjshields · · Score: 0, Troll

    How uninteresting and mediocre.

    Hold on a minute, this is slashdot!

    --
    In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  67. <homer>Stupid cloud cover!</homer> by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

    I went outside, found a good spot where it was framed *just so* with trees, set up my tripod, and started shooting every thirty seconds with my Nikon 4300.

    Got about two dozen beautiful shots of the moon. Then it went away. And I was left standing in front of my apartment building next to five feet of tripod, taking pictures of urban light pollution's glow on the underside of a squillion gallons of water vapor. Yeah, real fucking impressive.

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
  68. Some "GOOD" Eclipse pictures ... by Hulkster · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I give the submitter an A for effort, although I prefer the the collection of pictures from space.com and the Astronomy Picture of the Day had a red moon triple and a pumpkin moon that were pretty cool.

    And the Hulkster's personal favorite is when he takes a "bite outa the moon" in these lunar eclipse pictures

    1. Re:Some "GOOD" Eclipse pictures ... by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      space.com may have nice pictures, but it's a shame they can't get their facts right.

      From page 9 of the article on it:

      Totality -- when the Moon is completely immersed in shadow -- cannot run more than 1 hour and 40 minutes.

      I saw one that lasted 7 minutes longer.

  69. Re:shut your cake hole, poopsniffer by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, I saw Poltergeist and I thought that you weren't supposed to go into the light.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  70. My contribution to the movies by LaserBeams · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last lunar eclipse I took some zoom photos with a makeshift camera/binocular setup, and this time decided to do a sky track, like the original poster. Using thoroughly unimpressive equipment (a 1.3 MP Canon A10 digital camera and tripod) I took 60-some exposures once a minute over the transition from partial to total eclipse.

    Here's a short video of my result - it's not as smooth as the original poster's, but it shows the moon a bit better - however please don't expect miracles:

    90KB, 572x600, DivX, a few seconds long.

    --
    Karma: \Kar"ma\, n. [Skr.] (Buddhism) One's acts considered as fixing one's lot in the future existence.
    1. Re:My contribution to the movies by joesoundbyte · · Score: 0

      this one is much better.. at least you can see that it actually is a moon

    2. Re:My contribution to the movies by darkjohnson · · Score: 1

      Way better LaserBeams - I'm surprise the other one got the green light. I thought maybe he was tight on the moon and hand tracked it as it rose. That would have been way mo betta.

  71. Review of Movie by Thakandar2 · · Score: 1

    Basically it looks like old Gulf War pictures of tracers and bombs on the lighted city below. The red blinking light on the tower in the right hand portion of the frame distracts you until...

    This homing beacon of light making a gentle arc across the screen brightens and becomes larger until it looks like a beautiful oversized bar that twinkles like a star.

    A long time ago in a galaxy far, far, away....

  72. WMV alternative? by MobyDisk · · Score: 2, Informative
    The problem is that non-evil formats are either limited or not supported:
    • .MOV - Evil: Proprietary and not editable by free software;
    • .AVI - Bad; Not-evil, but the format is getting old and limiting. (Support for VBR audio is a bad hack and causes problems)
    • .WMV - Evil; A patent-encumbered replacement for AVI
    • .MPG - Bad; MPEG-1 is old and inefficient
    • .MP2 - Evil; MPEG-2 is patent encumbered
    • .MP4 - Good; Standard, less patent encumbered; Limited to MP4+AAC audio (but that isn't too bad); But nobody seems to use this format!
    We either need to:
    1. Adopt .MP4 and use it
    2. Create a non-patent-encumbered .WMV-like format.
    1. Re:WMV alternative? by JacobO · · Score: 1

      What is so bad with the AVI format? The content streams (and their patents) are irrelevant.

    2. Re:WMV alternative? by lintux · · Score: 1

      What about OGM? That's Ogg Theora, IIRC. Don't know how good it is though.

    3. Re:WMV alternative? by lucason · · Score: 1

      What the hell is wrong with avi?

      Xvid work fine, so does Div-X

      The last thing we need is wmv like format. It's total crap. It takes hours to encode, there is no easy wat to clip or trim it.

      And mpg, well it may not be the best compression, but at least it decompresses and plays full screen on a P1 90Mhz in good quality. So what if you need 1 gig for a movie?

    4. Re:WMV alternative? by Zardus · · Score: 1

      Quality-wise, its great. Very easy to do seperate audio streams, bundle subtitles in several languages, etc. A lot of Anime uses OGM nowadays, and the quality is damn-near perfect. I think the video streams are encoded in xvid, so it should be good for all sorts of stuff.

      --
      You can mod your friends, you can mod your nose, but you can't mod your friend's nose.
    5. Re:WMV alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AVI's don't have timestamps on the audio and the video, explaining why AVI's so often loose AV sync...

    6. Re:WMV alternative? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      Why did two people reply and ask the same question, which I answered in my message. Google for AVI VBR audio or something like that.

      The AVI format does not support VBR audio. Audio blocks MUST be the same size. There is a hack that allows you to multiplex VBR audio into AVI files, but it requires hacking the format and causes a number of sync issues. The whole point of AVI is Audio-Video-Interleave as shown in high-quality ASCII art:

      [--VBR video--][CBR audio] [VBR video][CBR audio] [----VBR video--][CBR audio] [VBR video-][CBR audio] etc.

      The only way to handle VBR audio in this format is to do this:

      [--VBR video--][VBR au] [VBR video][ioVBR a] [----VBR video--][udio VBR audio VB] [VBR video-][R audi] etc.

      This means that the audio data is ahead or behind the video data, and requires extra seeking, and extra player logic. It also impossible to stream if the audio data is sufficiently out-of-sync with the video.

  73. ed2k works; remove space by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

    Thanks, the .wmv on ed2k works great (fast!) once you remove the space from the hash.

    1. Re:ed2k works; remove space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot automatically adds space when there's a long series of characters without space in it. This is to prevent trolls from widening pages. And it seems like slashcode doesn't support anchor tags with ed2k addresses yet.

  74. bittorrent or edonkey? by mspice · · Score: 1

    Where is the .torrent file? I don't get it? I understand that the ed2k is 'edonkey200' but what is this strange mix of mentioning .torrent with an edonkey link? I thought that edonkey was a kazaa-like P2P app that was completely separate from bittorrent.

    Just looking for an answer,
    Michael

    1. Re:bittorrent or edonkey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can find the torrent files at the tracker website: http://66.38.8.41:6969

  75. Very lame by swb · · Score: 1

    It's very lame. There's no pre-eclipse moon (although perhaps there wasn't?), and the moon itself is very tiny relative to the screen size, and not much larger than many of the blinking background lights of the city, which are in and of themselves distracting.

    A tighter framing, no background lights, and a starting reference point (non-eclipsed moon) would have made it much more interesting.

  76. Re:Hmm not that impressive. - mod parent up by kilonad · · Score: 1

    That's a pretty nice picture you got there. I'm assuming you had to line them all up in photoshop afterwards?

  77. Re:Hmm not that impressive. - mod parent up by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

    Didn't really have to do much in the lineing up, I just kept adding the next photo on top (and the moon would already be in the right place) and then use a "difference blend".

    I don't really know what I'm doing so it took a while to figure out how to do that in photoshop. :)

    --
    Wiwi
    "I trust in my abilities,
    but I want more then they offer"
  78. Another Mirror by Laebshade · · Score: 1

    For those who just want a link (will probably keep it up for the entire day): http://technicallyincorrect.org/mirrors/LunarEclip se-10-2004-2.wmv

    Roughly 50 gigs of bandwidth to burn. Use it up!

  79. eclipse through a telescope by SKPhoton · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I took pictures of the eclipse through a pretty big telescope and they came out quite nicely.
    I've put them up here.

    1. Re:eclipse through a telescope by darkjohnson · · Score: 1

      About the only good thing the orginal video did was to bring out better links like this one and LaserBeam's. Good snaps, dude. (otherwise folks don't waste your time on the original video)

  80. movie format by Lord+Floppy · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if the movie was available in quicktime format. That poor server is trying hard isnt it.

    --
    Abandon all hope ye who enter here...
  81. Smog! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I think we have been ripped off. That is just ordinary Calif. smog blotting out a regular moon-rise :-)

    Seriously, I once visited an industrial area of China in which the smog was so bad the moon had the copper glow and dimming of an eclipse.

  82. Waste of time - it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody who hasn't downloaded this, don't bother. it's a complete waste of time and bandwith. I am starting to thin the /. editors want to test our limits by continually posting the shit they do. They're probably laughing their fat asses off. "Look at them go!"

    Bah, shitty article, shitty movie, shitty website.

    1. Re:Waste of time - it sucks by Tuna_Shooter · · Score: 1

      yeah !!! kinda like having Lemmings under your remote control. ! Jeesh lets drive em all over the cliff just for kicks.... but on another note i for one was amazed last nite watching my new Roomba clean the dust bunnies out from under my bed .. :-)

      --
      *--- Sometimes a majority only means that all the fools are on the same side. ---*
    2. Re:Waste of time - it sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roomba + dustrbunnies -> more exciting than this crummy video. The story submitter should be ashamed of himself.

  83. This site might be happy to mirror... by happyEverGeek · · Score: 1
    I believe Astronomy Picture Of the Day (APOD) would love to serve up your movie. The paragraph below was found here:
    http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/lib/about_apod.ht ml

    • Do you enjoy APOD?
    • Do you have a picture that would make a good APOD? If so, we would enjoy hearing from you. Images are most often submitted by email or by posting to a web site. Please write to Robert Nemiroff at nemiroff@mtu.edu or Jerry Bonnell at bonnell@grossc.gsfc.nasa.gov regarding image submissions.


    And thanks for freezing your @ss off for all us nerds.
    --
    To a politician, one email equals one voter.
  84. How far does it move during an eclipse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To shoot this with a static camera, as tight as possible, you need to know how many degrees the moon travels during the eclipse (Less, or More than the typical solar eclipse?)
    We have seen multiple exposure shots of eclipses I assume were made with static cameras, taking another shot as the round sky thingy moves out of its own way.

    Even the common 7x view as through binoculars might have looked disappointing as a movie, but that would have been nice magnification for a movie of the moon moving into or out of the earths shadow.

  85. Mirror by astram · · Score: 1

    One last mirror if still needed: http://silenceisdefeat.org/~alex/videos/LunarEclip se-10-2004.wmv

  86. For all of you who wanted a zoomed in shot... by MufasaZX · · Score: 1

    I didn't do that because it's old hat, I did it last year: LunarEclipse-5-2003.avi
    Or of course search Gnutella for the file, it's there, in fact looke like quite a few people have downloaded it too...

  87. Use a telescope by node159 · · Score: 1

    Seen though a telescope (low power one :), a full lunar eclips looks awsome, I'd recommend the experience to anybody.

    Having the moon hang there as this big redish sphere, you really get to see it under a different light [bad pun alert!], you realy get to apriciate its size, its an awsome experience.

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  88. Astrolabe & other references by node159 · · Score: 1

    Ohh you forgot to mention the doctoring of historical records to include the moon as well as the complete fabrication of the astrolable to highlught mans early understanding of the moons 'orbit'.

    Don't forget the early warnings of this spy station on the use of werewulf stories. :P

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  89. Tripod? by node159 · · Score: 1

    Ummm, not to be a dick or anything but if you planning on photographing the nigh sky generaly you use a tripod that adjusts for earths rotation, and for the poor students, they are not to hard to build either...

    The vid is pretty lame. I mean it misses the best part, the full eclips, with the moon glowing all red.

    --
    GPLv2: I want my rights, I want my phone call! DRM: What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
  90. WTF is ed2k?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this some proprietary protocol in Windows 2000? Seriously, I have never seen such a protocol, and none of my browsers recognize it. Anyone care to clue me in on what it is?

    1. Re:WTF is ed2k?? by paganizer · · Score: 1

      WHile I'm certain you are kidding, ed2k is a eDonkey/eMule/Overnet shareaza compatible link format. you know, that whole P2P thing everybody has been talking about?

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:WTF is ed2k?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for clarifying. And I wasn't kidding. I typically find everything I need through google. On the extremely rare occasion that I don't find it through google, I use AIM for file sharing, but only with a select few buddies that I trust.

  91. bittorrent is better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you guys provide links to a BT tracker hosting the file instead of trying to host it directly. These links go down so quickly because of the slashdot effect. But, in the case of bittorrent, the slashdot effect would actually become beneficial.

  92. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bittorrent files may be more available, but they download way too slowly.

    So STFU and HAND.

  93. fake? Re:eclipse through a telescope by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    The photos you've listed has the eclipse in REVERSE.

    The moon passed in the shadow from the left to the right, and you are showing from right to left.

    1. Re:fake? Re:eclipse through a telescope by SKPhoton · · Score: 1

      the photos are in the right order. they just weren't rotated properly. when looking through the telescope, you see a mirror image of the moon in the eyepiece.

      i held the camera parallel to the ground. as the eclipse progressed, the moon rose higher into the sky. the telescope had to be raised more and more vertically. thus, the eclipsed portion of the moon would appear to go from the side (correct), to near the top (incorrect).
      the image was right in the eyepiece but would change relative to the camera. i could have corrected this but didn't think about it. you're welcome to change it yourself in photoshop but i really don't care =)

  94. not fake but mirror reversed! by NuShrike · · Score: 1

    Here's my take of the eclipse as seen by people with refractor eyes.

    Taken with a Sony DSC-V1 at 4x optical zoom @ 5 megapixels, and then cropped; so you're seeing exact pixels. A nice big telescope would've been nice though, sorry for the wrong take.

    Pictures range from 1/60 second exposure to 10 seconds at f4.0.

    Up until it's entirely Slashdot'd eclipse mosiac

    1. Re:not fake but mirror reversed! by NuShrike · · Score: 1

      green is moon in ~infrared during totality

  95. Pimping my own version by Dubane · · Score: 1

    I posted some compilations of the shots I got here in Ottawa. I made a couple dual-screen wallpapers, a couple triple-monitor wallpapers, and one single screen wallpaper from the images.

    I have a 5x zoom on a 5 mega-pixel camera so the moon isn't too small. All the images and video shows the full-res moon. I'm hoping that next time around I'll have a telescope setup so I can get some much better closeups :)

    I also dumped the pics into Director to line everything up and export a movie which is available on the site too.

    http://www.dubane.com/lunareclipse2004/

    Enjoy.

  96. Plagiarist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As everyone knows, this is Right Wing Maniac's and he did it much better (good try, though):

    It amazes me that so many allegedly "educated" people have fallen so quickly and so hard for a fraudulent fabrication of such laughable proportions. The very idea that a gigantic ball of rock happens to orbit our planet, showing itself in neat, four-week cycles -- with the same side facing us all the time -- is ludicrous. Furthermore, it is an insult to common sense and a damnable affront to intellectual honesty and integrity. That people actually believe it is evidence that the liberals have wrested the last vestiges of control of our public school system from decent, God-fearing Americans (as if any further evidence was needed! Daddy's Roommate? God Almighty!)

    Documentaries such as Enemy of the State have accurately portrayed the elaborate, byzantine network of surveillance satellites that the liberals have sent into space to spy on law-abiding Americans. Equipped with technology developed by Handgun Control, Inc., these satellites have the ability to detect firearms from hundreds of kilometers up. That's right, neighbors .. the next time you're out in the backyard exercising your Second Amendment rights, the liberals will see it! These satellites are sensitive enough to tell the difference between a Colt .45 and a .38 Special! And when they detect you with a firearm, their computers cross-reference the address to figure out your name, and then an enormous database housed at Berkeley is updated with information about you.

    Of course, this all works fine during the day, but what about at night? Even the liberals can't control the rotation of the Earth to prevent nightfall from setting in (only Joshua was able to ask for that particular favor!) That's where the "moon" comes in. Powered by nuclear reactors, the "moon" is nothing more than an enormous balloon, emitting trillions of candlepower of gun-revealing light. Piloted by key members of the liberal community, the "moon" is strategically moved across the country, pointing out those who dare to make use of their God-given rights at night!

    Yes, I know this probably sounds paranoid and preposterous, but consider this. Despite what the revisionist historians tell you, there is no mention of the "moon" anywhere in literature or historical documents -- anywhere -- before 1950. That is when it was initially launched. When President Josef Kennedy, at the State of the Union address, proclaimed "We choose to go to the moon", he may as well have said "We choose to go to the weather balloon." The subsequent faking of a "moon" landing on national TV was the first step in a long history of the erosion of our constitutional rights by leftists in this country. No longer can we hide from our government when the sun goes down.

  97. Fast mirror by coaxial00 · · Score: 1

    Aw c'mon, its less than five megs :) http://coaxial.ca/temp/LunarEclipse-10-2004.wmv Hosted in a for-real datacenter.

  98. Great by billybob · · Score: 1

    Thats really simple. Thanks for making it so easy for everyone to grab a copy.

    --
    Joseph?
  99. Down. by ThomasKregaard · · Score: 1

    I've taken down the tracker.. Please use other mirrors.

  100. 2001 by xlcus · · Score: 1

    Here's a clip I took of the 2001 lunar eclipse...

    http://xlcus.com/photos/2001-01-09-totallunar/anim .html

  101. Time of the eclipse and sunsets are changing ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some people notice me that the eclipse
    was delayed some time ?
    And it was not showed exactly at the time expected.

    They told me also that there are reports
    saying that the sunsets have some minutes of difference with the exact time that must appear everyday.

    And that is happening because some invisible
    body in the solar sistem is affecting the paths
    and position of the planet.
    All the planets in the solar system
    are in the same plane, but this body is on another
    plane and just can be see it from the south pole.

    Somebody else have some information about it ???

  102. Motion tracking by heroine · · Score: 1

    You could have motion tracked a zoom image of the moon. Just cut out the 15 frames where you're realigning the tripod and motion track to get a rock solid picture.