Slashdot Mirror


eXeem Lite Public Beta Released

TheKarateMaster writes "Just days after the release of eXeem Open Beta comes eXeem lite 0.19 Public Beta. Much like with KaZaA, the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor. eXeem lite is spyware free and free of bloat -- and free. Version .20, which should fix a few minor bugs, is expected 'in next coming days.' (read: soon)"

180 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. Good news for the computer savvy by sjrstory · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whilst this is excellent news indeed, I fear only the so called "computer savvy" will reap the benefits of this (ie no spyware). There are a lot of people out there who seemingly click at random through the World Wide Wreckage, completely and utterly naive of the dangers they face. And there are others who just can't be bothered to protect themself from spyware, data loss, scams, identity theft, etc.

    Does this sound familiar:

    Clueless user: Hrm, that looks like a good idea. Click. Install. Now why is my computer slow and always crashing? Better call my tech boy genius neighbor!

    Tech boy genius neighbor: OMFG what did you do!?

    I commend the software venders that do their best to protect those who need protecting the most. Even Microsoft is looking into integrating Spyware search and destroy tools into Windows. It pays to get with the times!

    1. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Uber+Banker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mentioning mindless clicking and downloading - the story takes you to a website where the eXeemLite software just downloads.

      WTF? Computer savvy?

      Download a cracked version of some shadowy software - and trust that its 100% legit??? Why not publish MD5 sum of the package which can be verified by expert users willing to take the plunge?

      Plus, has anyone tried this on WINE?

    2. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Laebshade · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Replace "Better call my tech boy genius neighbor!" with "Better call my ISP! They can fix anything! They will fix anything!"

      Seriously. People call their ISP tech support whenever their PC gets slow, regardless if it's slow when they're actually using the Internet or not.

      Anyways, back on topic. I downloaded the last beta lite version of eXeem, and I couldn't find a damn thing I wanted.

    3. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by sjrstory · · Score: 1

      Yes well YOU know exactly where to go to find the Spyware free program, while other less "computer informed" (if you like that better than savvy) will go to the first site they find to download "that program that lets me download Britney Spears albums".

      Even if you know about the lite version of this p2p app, do you know how hard it was to find Kazzalite in recent times? All links seemingly point to the spyware version.

    4. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by batemanm · · Score: 4, Funny
      ...has anyone tried this on WINE?

      It was terrible. I saw two of them and they were both out of focus, then I was physically sick and in the morning I had a terrible headache. :-)

    5. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      Exactly.

    6. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by secolactico · · Score: 1

      Plus, has anyone tried this on WINE?

      It installs fine, but when I try to run it, it complains about missing activex and wine dies with a windows about "exception raised" or somesuch.

      --
      No sig
    7. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by EvilGrin666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plus, has anyone tried this on WINE?

      Full instructions here.

    8. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by chrishillman · · Score: 1

      I don't know why this is "news for Nerds" in the first place.
      I deal with spyware infections every day, even without people randomly installing crap a simple mistype of a URL and thanks to an ActiveX vulnerability you have spyware (an NT admin infected a server that way).
      All of that is moot thanks to programs like this. Installing the latest crack of photoshop CS is just asking for trouble.
      I advocate people stick with OSS for Win32. GIMP, OpenOffice and countless others. I don't need to steal programs to use my computers.
      One nitpick of the parent post: M$ is integrating GIANT anti-spyware (not Search-and-Destroy)...

    9. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need an emulator called WEED Emulates Executable Directions so we can call Jon Stewart in every time a new Windows program comes out -- "but have you run this software...on WEED?"

    10. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      If you're down with legal stuff, i found some Charlie Chaplin movies on eXeem earlier. I'm seeding with 20% complete, waiting for the original seeder to come back online.

      That's the problem with eXeem -- a lack of sense of community, so the seeders will just leave whenever they feel like it, and you don't know if they'll be back or not...eXeem feels too much like kazaa and not enough like bittorrent for the community atmosphere to support the downloads.

      On the other hand, the "comments" part of eXeem is pretty nice -- read comments on the files before downloading.

    11. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by gid13 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ironically, I'm reading this from my ISP tech support job, and you'd be stunned how bad the calls get. And probably how far we go to fix them sometimes.

      I'd say about 0.1% of calls, if that, could show any hint of being our problem. People don't just call us about the net being slow, they ask us about MSN, printers, screen resolutions, everything. I think my favourite calls have been as follows:

      1. "Close that window, please" "How do I do that?" "Just click the X at the top right corner" "What is an X?"

      2. "Is the text highlighted blue?" "Yes" "Okay, press backspace" "I don't see backspace"... "Okay, press delete" "Okay, it says 'you can delete all offline content'..." "No no, don't CLICK 'delete files', press the delete key on the keyboard" "What's a keyboard?"... Insert about 5 mins of me unsuccessfully trying to explain what a keyboard is.

      3. "What is a modem?" "Well, it's basically a phone for your computer; it lets your computer talk to our computer through the phone lines" "What's a phone?" "Uh, the thing you're talking to me on"

      Sorry, just needed to vent.

    12. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by ect5150 · · Score: 1


      It pays to get with the times!

      Who does it pay for though? My buddy who runs a network of XP machines likes microsoft to the extent of job security. After all, if everything ran the way we wanted it to, where would many of us work?

      --
      I have never let my schooling interfere with my education.
    13. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Talinom · · Score: 1

      Tech boy genius neighbor: OMFG what did you do!?

      Clueless user: Nothing, it just started acting funny.

      Tech boy genius neighbor: Have you installed anything since I fixed your computer last time?

      Clueless user: No.

      Tech boy genius neighbor (BOFH level now 1): So you computer, for no reason whatsoever, started to slow down as if by magic?

      Clueless user: Yeah.

      Tech boy genius neighbor (BOFH level now 2): I guess your screwed, then. Sounds like your computer is dying and may catch fire any minute. I would suggest that you buy a new one and dispose of your current one. It's toast, buddy.

      Clueless user: My last tech guy a few years ago said the same thing then when this happend.

      Tech boy genius neighbor (BOFH level now 4): It happens. Say, have you heard about those draconian computer recycling laws? I have a way you can beat their system...

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    14. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      People need to get a grip. So what if eXeem is bundled with a program that shows ads within it? Do the authors not deserve fair compensation for their work? The eXeem site says that NO spyware is installed. One ad-ware program is, and that is used to show ads INSIDE the eXeem application. You aren't going to be getting bazillions of pop-ups and shizzit because you installed eXeem. This is just a way that the authors are trying to make a few bucks, since most people won't pay to use the program.

      Of course, most people using eXeem are downloading movies/music/software illegally anyway, so using a hacked copy of eXeem to keep the authors of it from getting paid seems fitting.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    15. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Laebshade · · Score: 1

      I've had phone calls similar to what you describe (level 1 tech support grunt here). My favorite has to be where they call in with a game console hooked to their cable modem and expect us to troubleshoot it. A coworker even had someone refuse to hook up their PC to troubleshoot the connection.

    16. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by nyquil · · Score: 1

      has anyone done this completely in linux? when I run the installer I get a few errors towards the end of the install and then the executable doesnt run. those isntructions say to copy over your windows install dir, but I have none.

    17. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

      "Tech boy genius neighbor: OMFG what did you do!?"

      Wrong.

      Tech boy genius neighbor: Ah hah! Now I get to charge him more for his cluelessness! Now I can afford to buy that hot new gamer's case!

      God (Torvalds) bless spyware!

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    18. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by mikiN · · Score: 1

      thanks to an ActiveX vulnerability you have spyware (an NT admin infected a server that way)

      Persuade him to use Mozilla (or Firefox). No ActiveX support (by default), so no vulnerabilities because of it either. You can get ActiveX support if you really need it, but only if you know what you're doing.

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    19. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by dmneoblade · · Score: 1

      What about Alexia... the spyware that COMES WITH XP

      --
      Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
    20. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by EmperorKagato · · Score: 1
      So far Trend Micro likes it.
      Since I am a look-out for viruses. I will gladly test this software and wait for anything malicious to happen. I can afford to be a frog.
      --
      ----- You know you have ego issues when you register a domain in your name.
    21. Re:Good news for the computer savvy by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Neophyte friends, relatives and neighbors have bought me lots of beer/tech goodies over the years.

      I'm thankful for them.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  2. Guess Exeem Lite is the end of Exeem by barcodez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Which is only good news as the poliferation of spyware is just a waste of everyones time and and invasion of privacy.

    --

    ----
    1. Re:Guess Exeem Lite is the end of Exeem by David+Horn · · Score: 1

      Pity really - they had a chance, and screwed it. I couldn't care less if the software I use (assuming it's free) has a banner ad somewhere in it.

      I get extremely pissed off if it includes spyware and then the developers lie about it.

      Long live Exeem Lite! May the creator of Exceem make no profit on it at all.

      --
      PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    2. Re:Guess Exeem Lite is the end of Exeem by Zocalo · · Score: 1
      Long live Exeem Lite! May the creator of Exceem make no profit on it at all.

      Perhaps, but perhaps not. There isn't much information out there about how the Exeem actually network works, but I get the distinct impression that the Exeem servers are necessary for it to function. Do they merely act as a gateway to the network, are purely for the Spyware/Ad serving, or (as I suspect) are integral to providing the Kazaa style "search engine"? More importantly, can Exeem Lite still function if those servers are not there? That's the crux of it really, because those servers are the obvious focal point for any legal efforts to shut the network down, plus if Exeem fails as a P2P app or a money making venture then those servers will go away.

      Personally, my opinion is more aligned with your first sentence; "Pity really - they had a chance, and screwed it." I'm sure that over time it's going to gain some momentum, maybe even a lot of it, but for now at least I'm staying well clear of using it in anger. I might do some packet captures and so on with Exeem Lite to resolve the question of the central servers though...

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:Guess Exeem Lite is the end of Exeem by nuclear305 · · Score: 1

      "I get extremely pissed off if it includes spyware and then the developers lie about it."

      If you read the privacy policy for eXeem it openly states:

      Third Party Advertising
      The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users. If you would like more information about Cydoor, please visit: http://www.cydoor.com/Cydoor/Company/CompanyPrivac y.htm

      Of course, that doesn't make it any better in my view...I don't want that crap installed regardless.

  3. Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Somebody please write an Azureus plugin for Exeem!

    1. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Norgus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Indeed, if that became the case THEN exeem would really be worth using.

      For the few of you you havnt heard of azureus, its an excelent and cross platform java bittorrent client. Very feature full.

      So come on people! write an exeem plugin for azures, pretty please?

    2. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I love Azureus because it is the most complete program ever done for Bittorrent but it's written in Java and with 500 MBytes of RAM, my computer crawls to death (I'm not trolling, it is the reality :(

    3. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Why not use the money you saved by warezing photoshop to buy more RAM?

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    4. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      500 MB Ram, eh? So you've found the ever elusive 244MB Ram stick?

    5. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For the few of you you havnt heard of azureus, its an excelent and cross platform java bittorrent client. Very feature full.

      So Azureus is excellent, cross platform and fature full. Whereas eXeem is Windows only and full of spyware. Why exactly would you want to combine them?

    6. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by aricept · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think his point is that someone should write a plugin that searches and downloads from the Exeem network - much like the irc plugin that comes (or came) with Azureus - thereby avoiding the spyware and adware, and giving cross-platform access to the Exeem network.

    7. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by ZonaldRumzfeld · · Score: 1

      What kind of computer do you have? Azureus takes at the most (That I've seen) 80mb of RAM for me, even with a lot of stuff downloading.

    8. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 1

      You're not trolling, just stupid.

      http://azureus.sourceforge.net/2200/cpu_usage.php

      If your computer still crawls to death after you install Java 1.5, I'll eat my hat.

      --
      ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    9. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Why not use java.exe instead of javaw.exe?

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    10. Re:Azureus Plugin for Exeem by jseale · · Score: 1

      Why bother. Exeem itself does BitTorrent a complete disservice (at least in its beta form). It's slow as heck and many of my searches conducted via Exeem have come up nada. As a matter of fact, I've only been using the new files tab to see what's out there to grab, and most of it is crap IMHO. I like being able to post files sans-tracker though. Can't do that with a conventional BT client.

  4. Re:I thought.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To be fair, they kind of screw themselves over asking for donations, given that their users are exactly the people too cheap to pay for music/tv/games/whatever.

  5. Good News! by codesurfer · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the FAQ There are currently no versions of eXeem(TM) for Linux or Mac. No way to install spyware on my Linux box? Awwww, what a shame!

    1. Re:Good News! by rollx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I tryed it on my freebsd box under wine emulator. Now way. It's just throwing me messages like:
      "where is your IE? I need ActiveX!!!"
      no thanks.
      (and why should /. "advertize" things like eXeem?)

    2. Re:Good News! by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      Just got it (eXeemLite) running on WINE under Linux (BYO).

    3. Re:Good News! by polyp2000 · · Score: 1

      FYI and anyone else for that matter...
      eXeem lite appears to work well under the latest Crossover Wine... Of course that doesnt negate the requirement for a less encumbered open source incarnation.

      --
      Electronic Music Made Using Linux http://soundcloud.com/polyp
    4. Re:Good News! by rollx · · Score: 1

      don't forget:
      %rm -rf ~/.wine/drive_c/Program\ Files/eXeem\ Lite
      if you don't want any *evil* backdoor on your *nix (:

    5. Re:Good News! by clymere · · Score: 1

      A lot of things require some version of IE to run in wine. Visio was smart enough to offer to go download a copy and install it. Not that I'm happy about IE on my box, but if its a dependency, then so be it.

      --
      once you go slack, you never go back
    6. Re:Good News! by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      " From the FAQ There are currently no versions of eXeem(TM) for Linux or Mac. No way to install spyware on my Linux box? Awwww, what a shame!

      I'm pretty sure that if that ever happens, the only info they'll be getting out of browser histories will be faked links to goatse.

      --
      I don't get it.
    7. Re:Good News! by ProdigySim · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'd like to remind everyone to RTFAQ:
      From the FAQ section at ExLite.net:
      10. Can I use eXlite with linux?
      Yes you can, but only when using wine, instructions here.

    8. Re:Good News! by kaustik · · Score: 1

      I hate to play Devil's advocate here, but... you ever try installing just about anything in Linux? When I go to yum or urpmi a package, I am always given a list of 5-10 other items that must be installed first. I generally trust these dependencies in Linux more than I would in Windows, but it boils down to the same thing - the app you want depends on code in an existing program.

  6. New name for Exeem Lite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    eXLax - Exeem without the crap.

  7. Re:In other news... by Demanche · · Score: 1

    Looks like you might want to read the two articles.. this one is the lite version eh...

    --
    Mod me down im a newf (wiki)
  8. Re:In other news... by awolk · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is now known that slashdot editors don't read slashdot.

    That was the official eXeem release, the one with spyware.
    This is eXeem Lite, which is supposed to be spyware free.

  9. So... by slavemowgli · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How long until the eXeem makers either sue or try to ban lite users from the network?

    --
    quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    1. Re:So... by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

      They've already said they'll try to do that.

      But since it's not an option to me to use a Cydoor-infested eXeem, I'll just use other software in replacement of this one, and maybe eXeem Lite for however long I can. For replacements, BT trackers are still around, alive and highly functional, and solve the whole deal with the Kazaaification eXeem might experience too. For more rare stuff than might be found on BT networks, there's always uncentralized networks like Kademlia. Slower downloads, but an amazing selection.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:So... by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      Soon I would expect. Assuming they only want authorised users using the correct eXeem client connecting to their servers they would be well within their rights to do so.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    3. Re:So... by Ours · · Score: 1

      Who needs that? Install eXeem, run anti-spy and off you go. It was my test of Microsoft's anti-spyware and I must say it worked perfectly.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
  10. A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by xDCDx · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If only Bram Cohen would had licensed the original bittorrent under the GPL (rather than the MITL), people would not be able to profit so easily from his work.

    Granted, the trackerless protocol surely took some work, but the base BT protocol (and its implementation) was the revolutionary thing.

    I hate companies providing adware software like Kazaa or Exeem, that promise you heaven on earth, and actually offer subpar programs, that would have much more quality as an opensource project (see eDonkey vs eMule).

    1. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by costas · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even if he had done so, there are tons of BT-compatible codebases out there (Azureus is in Java, BitComet in C++, libtorrent in C AFAIK); the license of the original Python client is not the issue. Unless of course you mean that Mr. Cohen should have either patented or claimed copyright on the BT protocol itself which is (to say the least) very much against the spirit of the GPL.

    2. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by legirons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If only Bram Cohen would had licensed the original bittorrent under the GPL (rather than the MITL), people would not be able to profit so easily from his work."

      Presumably it's not the profit which is the problem, so much as the creation of non-Free software which is competing in an an unfair* way with the original.

      *unfair as in, one project can take freely from the other, but not vice-versa.

      But we all already knew this right? It's not like RMS warned us in 1985 about the problems with non-GPL licenses...

    3. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by stevey · · Score: 1

      Have you tried the official BitTorrent download for Windows?

      It repeatedly causes popup messages boxes to display nagging you to donate money, enough for me to get very annoyed with it - and I did even donate!

    4. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by latroM · · Score: 1

      Unless of course you mean that Mr. Cohen should have either patented or claimed copyright on the BT protocol itself which is (to say the least) very much against the spirit of the GPL.

      Protocols can't be copyrighted.

    5. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by stienman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If only Bram Cohen would had licensed the original bittorrent under the GPL (rather than the MITL), people would not be able to profit so easily from his work.

      And we wouldn't have exeem. Unless, of course, you can point out an open source solution that provides the same (and better, according to you) features compared to exeem?

      Don't you hate it when people complain about the GPL restricting their free use of software? You are complaining about another person's use of a license.

      When you release your software, you get to choose the license. Don't complain about another author's choice of license. I want other people to use my software, even to make money off it. Therefore I use the BSD license. We have philisophical and political differences, but that doesn't make my choice bad and your choice good. In my case, I don't want to force others to give back to the 'community' - I let them choose how they contribute (or if) to society. The GPL preference is to tell people, "Use my software and you have to release all your efforts - if not, I'm taking my toys and going home."

      Sarcasm aside, each has its advantages and disadvantages. I suspect many choose the GPL not because they have an altruistic desire to further society. Many release it for the reasons you imply when you say, "people would not be able to profit so easily from his work." They don't want other people profiting off their work. "If I can't or didn't make money off it, neither can you." Which, I feel, is a very different goal than the claimed altruism of the GPL.

      I don't mean to imply that most people have this in mind when choosing a license, but I've seen this side of the license debate more than I care to.

      -Adam

    6. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by DrSkwid · · Score: 1


      duh, just press "i have donated" and it goes away

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by xDCDx · · Score: 1

      You are right, I didn't realize that.

      Now I would not be completely sure that eXeem did not 'borrow' code from Azureus or libtorrent, both having the GPL (I think BitComent sourcecode is not available).

    8. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by Xemu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now I would not be completely sure that eXeem did not 'borrow' code from Azureus or libtorrent, both having the GPL

      Indeed. The eXeem home page states that the program is based on libtorrent.

      --
      Tell your friends about xenu.net
    9. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by xDCDx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You made a good point.

      Exeem opensource alternative: http://kenosis.sourceforge.net/. Probably needs more work, more recognition and a slightly nicer website (well, and a license, it does not seem to have one).

      If I make some useful piece of software in my spare time, I would not care that some John Doe would profit from it, or even that companies like Google would profit from it; but I wouldn't stand companies like Microsoft, Kazaa or Exeem earning money from it. So it has to be everyone or no one (that is, the GPL).

      Yes, I know I have biased prejuices against (most) corporations, but when I, for example, visit the websites of the three companies I named, a voice in my head tells me: these companies don't do things with good heart, they only do things for the shake of winning money, and don't care about the happyness of the user.

      On the other hands I perceive the Mozilla Foundation (not profiting) or Google (profiting) as two companies that truly try to offer useful things and care about the user.

      I know everybody has to work for a living, but if nobody would do things for the shake of doing useful things, or for the shake of research, open source software would not exist at all.

      My philosophy is, do something because you truly think it is useful for people, profiting from it or not, but not make something just for profit. That is why I lobby for the GPL, against software patents, etc.

      "If I can't or didn't make money off it, neither can you."

      Probably many people think this, but I hope you saw how my view is different from this.

    10. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by timmyf2371 · · Score: 1

      I don't see this as much of a problem - Bram Cohen licensed the original code under a license which allows developers more freedom (including said code in closed-source applications) and as such the creators of eXeem are merely following the terms of the license.

      --

      Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (P)anic
    11. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by Knights+who+say+'INT · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but the GPL allows you to go dual-license. Qt does that; you can use Qt as GPL'ed software and be obligated to release all your efforts, or you can buy a commercial license and keep your code improvements to yourself.

      "You can (1) repay me with money or (2) repay releasing your improvements to the community. Your choice."

      Sometimes people like to eat.

    12. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by Ibag · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure that would have been against the spirit of the GPL. The GPL use copyright to say "Normally, you couldn't do anything to distribute this, but I'm letting you, as long as you keep things free in some specific sense of the word."

      I think that claiming ownership of the protocol and then saying that the protocol was liscensed freely for use in GPL'd programs would be exactly in the spirit of the GPL. The GPL is all about using the power that you have to keep things open.

    13. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Well, Azureus is Java, so I doubt that eXeem borrowed code from them.

    14. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that claiming ownership of the protocol and then saying that the protocol was liscensed freely for use in GPL'd programs would be exactly in the spirit of the GPL.

      Protocols are ideas; they can't be copyrighted, but they can be patented or trade-secreted. If a GPL program is the first to implement an unpatented protocol, then there's nothing prohibiting a reimplementation in a BSD licensed program or a proprietary program.

    15. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      but the base BT protocol (and its implementation) was the revolutionary thing.

      BT doesn't do anything that other P2P protocols like eDonkey/eMule already have been doing for years.

      The revolutionary (social) idea was the centralized trackers, and if you take those away you have Just Another P2P App.

    16. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say the GPL is so much about "I don't want people to profit from my work" as it is "I don't want other people to take away my control over my work." With BSD (or public domain, for that matter) anyone can come along and take your work, advertise their proprietary fork, and then -- here's the issue -- make their fork incompatible in order to destroy the value of you choosing the BSD license to begin with. After all, you gave away your software because you wanted it to be a common base for interoperability, right? Well, if the most popular fork isn't interoperable, you've been screwed over.

      The GPL is nothing more or less than a defense mechanism against that scenario; it forces interoperability while the BSD license merely encourages it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    17. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by Justin205 · · Score: 1

      The unfortunate thing is... By based on, do they mean a modified version of libtorrent which they provide the source code for (but JUST for libtorrent - not the rest)? Or a plain version that they write more code to "wrap around" libtorrent, giving it the trackerless functionality? Or do they mean they simply stole GPL code, rewrote it, didn't provide any sort of source, and should be crushed into oblivion for doing something so wrong?

      --
      "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
    18. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by Sweetshark · · Score: 1

      as has been discussed elsewhere:
      libtorrent is BSD-licensed.

    19. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by mattgreen · · Score: 1

      Since when were corporations founded to be your friend?

      They weren't. They exist to make money for their shareholders. They are *not* people. Stop trying to ascribe personality traits to them! Eventually, when it comes down to the bottom line or being 'cool' in the fickle eyes of geeks, they'll favor the bottom line.

      I don't see why you believe that companies exist for any reason OTHER than to make money.

    20. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by grub · · Score: 1


      But if you didn't really donate that makes you dishonest. You shouldn't be using any P2P stuff if you're dishonest...

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    21. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      I hope that was a joke, but i'll bite.
      bittornado? or any of the plethora of BT clients? Bittornado offers much more config options than the standard BT client. I only remember using the official client for a few weeks, before switching to Bittornado(it was the Shad0w's experimental back then).

    22. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by flosofl · · Score: 1

      Not every OSS project is GPL.

      --
      "This calls for a very special blend of psychology and extreme violence" - Vyvyan "The Young Ones"
    23. Re:A shame original bittorrent didn't use GPL by AME · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure what your point is, nor how your post responds to the parent.

      The parent seems, to me, to be saying that we shouldn't be critisizing authors for their choice of license just because it doesn't square with our sensibilities. And you reply that an author could use the GPL and make money also by dual-licensing?

      --
      "I have a good idea why it's hard to verify programs. They're usually wrong." --Manuel Blum, FOCS 94
  11. Is this true? by unorthod0x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor

    Can this above comment be explained? I downloaded and installed eXeem, it did not appear to include any spyware whatsoever. It certainly did not come packaged with Cydoor. What's the deal here?

    1. Re:Is this true? by Silvrmane · · Score: 2, Funny

      True. Congratulations, you've just installed Cydoor. Lets hope you didn't opt for the Explorer toolbar option as well...

    2. Re:Is this true? by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 1
      They're not exactly hiding the fact... Check the privacy statement:
      Third Party Advertising
      The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users. If you would like more information about Cydoor, please visit: http://www.cydoor.com/Cydoor/Company/CompanyPrivac y.htm

      Ads that might appear outside Exeem.com and eXeem(TM) application are Opt-out ads, that you have a chance to uninstall. Outside Exeem.com and eXeem(TM) application is eXeem's Toolbar LookSmart .

    3. Re:Is this true? by jalefkowit · · Score: 1
      I downloaded and installed eXeem, it did not appear to include any spyware whatsoever. It certainly did not come packaged with Cydoor.

      Oh yes it did:

      The ads appearing on the Exeem.com Web site and within eXeem(TM) application are delivered by our web advertising partner, Cydoor. Information about users of eXeem(TM) and Exeem.com, such as the number of times they have viewed an ad (but not user name, address, or other personal information), is used to serve ads to users.

      Don't think that just because Exeem doesn't tell you at install time that it includes Cydoor, that it doesn't.

    4. Re:Is this true? by imsabbel · · Score: 1

      not true.
      i installed it being aware of the cydor possiblility. After installing, there were no registry entries by cydor, no cydor dlls present nor were any processes running.
      So it wasnt installed.

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    5. Re:Is this true? by mejesster · · Score: 1

      A scan by Ad-Aware SE with current definitions reveals no Cydoor, but a scan with Spybot S&D does.

      --
      MacroHard - Boning you in a big way! (TM)
    6. Re:Is this true? by Barny · · Score: 1

      Correct, the only parts of cydoor used are the ad viewing ones, all they do is dl the ads into a system folder, and then only while exeem is running, watch your router traffic and see ;)

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    7. Re:Is this true? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      I also downloaded this. I had no problems with spyware. Checking the /windows/system32/adcache/ shows no files in there. Running AdAware and SpyBot turns up no spyware found. Searching the registry for "cydoor" turns up no results.

      Maybe an early beta had Cydoor in it?

      Maybe someone is just trying to get traffic by spreading rumors about a really nice tool.

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    8. Re:Is this true? by spoodie · · Score: 1

      I too can find no evidence of Cydoor on my PC after installing Exeem. I've done a full scan with Adaware and even checked for the files and registry entries but there's nothing suspicious that I can see.

      Perhaps it's intergrated into Exeem.

      --
      I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines.
    9. Re:Is this true? by XFilesFMDS1013 · · Score: 1

      No, trust me, every version of eXeem has Cydoor in it. And are you saying that you downloaded the lite version of it? Or the version off of the eXeem website?

    10. Re:Is this true? by DamienThorn · · Score: 1

      when I grabbed a copy of eXeem, cydoor came with it...fortunately I knew it might arrive and removed it. I really hate bundling programs with crap like Cydoor..

    11. Re:Is this true? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I wanna back this up -- I believe those who say Cydoor was installed. However, it most definitely is not doing anything on my computer. Nothing is dialing in, no pop-ups, nothing. Could it be that I installed/run eXeem in a limited user and not admin account? And yes, this came right off exeem.com

    12. Re:Is this true? by TxdoHawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cydoor definitely is installed, however, the reason you're not seeing any activity from it yet is because there's no ads yet. See those ad-sized black boxes in Exeem? Those will only be empty until Exeem finds some companies to advertise with. Then you will see activity. This will likely happen closer to the release of 1.0.

      From what I understand, Cydoor is pretty much harmless, but I suppose we'll see what happens. I'm planning on reformatting my rig very soon, so I took the chance.

    13. Re:Is this true? by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 1

      Exeem's website. No spyware in here...

      --
      I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
    14. Re:Is this true? by 0siris · · Score: 1

      Taken from the eXeem main site:

      "eXeem is a brand new Peer-To-Peer program, which is based on the BitTorrent idea. eXeem eliminates the need for trackers as nodes in the program will be taking their role. eXeem also features easy publication of files to the network as well as a rating and comments system. eXeem contains NO SPYWARE. eXeem is free and is ad-supported eXeem is currently still in its beta testing phase, which means that the network might not be completely stable yet. You are still very welcome to give eXeem a try and see how it is different from other Peer-To-Peer programs."

      So it claims not to use Spyware, and yet admits in the FAQ that it uses Cydoor. I'm confused :-/

    15. Re:Is this true? by bunsonh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm not doubting the fact that eXeem installed Cydoor into their client, but I checked out the details that Symantec offers regarding Cydoor, and neither of the .dll files, nor registry entries occur on my computer. So, either this is a different version of Cydoor, or eXeem has not installed it on my box yet.

      I most certainly installed eXeem from the eXeem website. I don't know what's going on.

    16. Re:Is this true? by Suddenly_Dead · · Score: 1

      Cydoor can and will, unfortunately, run while eXeem is closed. I have no problems with programs using built in ads, but when the ad provider stays running and downloading/monitoring constantly, something is wrong.

  12. eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by Lepaca+Kliffoth · · Score: 1

    eXeem Lite is not developed separately from eXeem. They take eXeem and hack it, they aren't creating anything new. If eXeem lives, eXeem Lite lives. If eXeem Lite lives, it means eXeem is still around. eXeem Lite won't substitute eXeem, so it's not in competition with eXeem and it's not an improvement either. It's just a mod. If someone thinks eXeem is based on a good idea, he should start his own development of an eXeem-like network, he SHOULDN'T hack eXeem. That's pointless.

    1. Re:eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To Lepaca:
      I don't understand your point, Lepaca. I just used the lite version to dl a nice PDF version of the Kama Sutra. How is eXeem or eXeemLite useless? Why is taking a decent program riddled with spyware (eXeem, KaZaA) and hacking out the spyware (lite versions), therefore improving the base program, not a valid endeavor?

      To the anti-p2p crowd:
      You people make me sick. You know in your heart-of-hearts that there's plenty of legitimate uses for this technology, and yet you still try to paint p2p users with the broad brush of illegality. Go bust the kids trading Brittney tracks! Leave us the tools to easily distribute legitimate large files (Linux distros, Project Gutenberg archives, etc), you dark-minded fucks.

    2. Re:eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by ahertz · · Score: 3, Insightful
      To the anti-p2p crowd:
      You people make me sick. You know in your heart-of-hearts that there's plenty of legitimate uses for this technology, and yet you still try to paint p2p users with the broad brush of illegality. Go bust the kids trading Brittney tracks! Leave us the tools to easily distribute legitimate large files (Linux distros, Project Gutenberg archives, etc), you dark-minded fucks.

      I'm sympathetic to your point, but this seems to be the wrong discussion to be making it in. Check out clause 7.b. of the eXeem license agreement. Users of the software agree not to redistribute or modify it. What are the people who made eXeem lite doing? Redistributing a modified version. Even if you use the software only to distribute 100% legitimate, public domain or freely redistributable stuff, you're still commiting copyright infringement by using eXeem Lite!
      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized. -AC
    3. Re:eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by ahertz · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but, historically there has always been a significant legal distinction between reverse-enginnering in a "clean" setting for the purpose of interoperatbility and copyright infringement. See, for example, Phoenix Technology's revese engineering of IBM's BIOS. This principle has been upheld recently; the DMCA even has a specific exemption for reverse engineering for interoperability.

      I'm not familiar with the specifics of what mldonkey is doing, but I suspect that the answer to your question lies in this concept. Certainly it holds for gaim and trillian.

      --
      Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized. -AC
    4. Re:eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by Lepaca+Kliffoth · · Score: 1

      Now, I certainly hope nobody took offense for what I said! I meant that the original eXeem is useless (contains spyware, controlled by a single company, windows-only etc: it goes against what bittorrent is and was meant to achieve) and if someone thinks the actual system behind it is worthy he should work/support an alternative implementation. Hacking proprietary software to make it more appealing is BAD. Maybe I used the wrong word? With useless I mean that if you stand for p2p and the bittorrent philosophy then you shouldn't use eXeem. Besides, eXeem lite is like having a cracked antivirus program. I'm sure most slashdotters are better than that.

    5. Re:eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by ymgve · · Score: 1

      This is the wrong discussion for talking about legal uses with p2p. Remember, the creation of eXeem is a direct consequence of the copyright holders shutting down certain torrent sites.

      For legal purposes, though, the original BitTorrent software is still just as useful as before. People that distribute Linux ISOs or game demos don't need eXeem. For them, the software is a solution to something that never was a problem in the first place.

    6. Re:eXeem Lite is useless as much as eXeem is by DrunkenTerror · · Score: 1

      No, no! No offense taken. That's why I addressed my comments in the way that I did. I see what you mean now, about eXeem being useless. I didn't understand your point before. I just figured some ap2p trolls would be along soon enough and tacked that extra bit on there. Peace!

  13. Re:I thought.... by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Surpnova asked for donations yes, but eXeem is unrelated to suprnova for all but publicity purposes - it was an existing development project which latched on to the recent publicity surrounding SUprnova (with its apparent approval).

  14. If any of you had bothered to read the content by jasonmicron · · Score: 1

    If any of you had bothered to read the content of the two eXeem stories you would realize that one says, "Open Public Beta" while the other says, "Just days after the release of eXeem Open Beta comes eXeem lite 0.19 Public Beta."

    Doh!

  15. Easy fix by Barny · · Score: 5, Informative

    Easy fix, easyer than DLing and maintaining a differant client...

    Delete files in c:\windows\system32\AdCache

    Set all user permissions on folder c:\windows\system32\AdCache to deny (no access)

    block/deny:
    *cydoor.com/*
    *cms.com/*

    It doesn't complain if the ads are not comming in, it just throws them up :)

    --
    ...
    /me sighs
    1. Re:Easy fix by AIX-Hood · · Score: 1

      You sure about the cms.com? Visiting the site, doesn't show anything ad or spyware related.

    2. Re:Easy fix by Barny · · Score: 1

      Your right,

      2004cms.com

      Is what you want to block, very sorry to owners of cms.com ^_^

      as soon as you fire up eXeem it does 2 http POST transactions to this server, server gives a 404 if you try geting anything from it.

      Found the program doesn't install the cydoor dlls and executables, must be useing them internally.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    3. Re:Easy fix by illumin8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Easy fix, easyer than DLing and maintaining a differant client...

      Delete files in c:\windows\system32\AdCache

      Set all user permissions on folder c:\windows\system32\AdCache to deny (no access)

      block/deny:
      *cydoor.com/*
      *cms.com/*

      It doesn't complain if the ads are not comming in, it just throws them up :)


      Although I appreciate the information, I'd just as soon not have the spyware installed on my computer in the first place. Unless you've sat there with a debugger and stepped through Cydoor one instruction at a time, how do you know it doesn't stick copies of itself somewhere else, or trojan another binary along the way? These spyware programs are notorious for nasty tricks like that.

      Also, I remember reading in the previous article that uninstalling Cydoor causes Exeem to stop working, so you're still better off using the Lite client.

      Please don't support spyware or authors that include spyware in their products. There are better ways to make money, and decent programmers can simply use Paypal or some other method of donationware to make a buck, while still delivering value (and most importantly goodwill) to their users.

      My guess is the real reason why they're funding this using Adware is that the original Suprnova was mostly funded by banner ads, and they still need a revenue stream. Of course, now the editors are no longer screening content, so what they bring to the table (besides the application) is not as much.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:Easy fix by Barny · · Score: 1

      Hehe, in effect you are not supporting them if you are not viewing the ads, your machine is not DLing them and so they are not being counted by cydoor as being viewed by a eXeem client.

      As for how to tell its not doing anything else (like piggy backing another dll, etc) i watch the traffic through my router and see whats requesting what, since the task of the software (cydoor) is to DL ads and report back how many times each one has been viewed its easy to tell when it is running.

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    5. Re:Easy fix by ramunas · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or I REALY can't find any of the spyware that is said to acompany eXeem...

      --
      ./R My blog
    6. Re:Easy fix by __int64 · · Score: 1

      Bittorrent, restate my assumptions:
      The success of Bittorrent was primarily attributed to the efficient manor in which large files could be distributed across the network. Its centralized nature, despite hindering anonymity, greatly improved the quality of its content; acting as a mechanism for repelling unwanted (poor quality, miss labeled) files.

      eXeem, although emulating and improving upon these features, fails to target the appropriate market which will ultimately sustain it. Through spyware bundling and platform locking, they instantly repel a core segment of advanced users. These users are primarily responsible for the 'creation' and initial injection of new content onto the network. Denying these users inherently denies the network the ability to directly acquire new content; they're damming themselves into becoming another FastTrack network.

      Unless they open up their standards or allow for breached (hacked) client access, the only thing we're going to have here is an improved way for disseminating gonzo porn and mislabeled 24khz mp3s.

    7. Re:Easy fix by pi314 · · Score: 1

      Did you really get a free mac mini?

    8. Re:Easy fix by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Well, if you help me out I might be able to. The company that is offering this is Gratis Network, which is legit. They are also offering the free iPods and other things. I did my research on them and they are the real deal. You can get one too... Just click on my sig.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    9. Re:Easy fix by Barny · · Score: 1

      And they are not harvesting email adresses for spam purposes? :P

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
    10. Re:Easy fix by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      And they are not harvesting email adresses for spam purposes? :P

      They probably are. Just use a spamhole address like I did.

      Also, you might want to read up on the company like I did before signing up.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  16. Pft by DOS-5 · · Score: 1, Funny
    I have a few problems with this. First, they could have put both versions of the software on ONE web site. I also like how the fact that the light version's web site mentions that it doesn't contain spyware but for the non-lite version, this fact is hidden somewhere in their FAQ. Not only that but the version that DOES have the spyware has a very flashy site, but I guess I can't complain about minimalism. Just seems like they're trying to trick people into downloading the spyware loaded version.

    Another thing, I can't seem to tell what the differences between the two versions are aside from the fact that one has spyware and the other doesn't.

    1. Re:Pft by Lepaca+Kliffoth · · Score: 1

      Huh look, the actual development group is only creating eXeem. eXeem lite is a hack made by god-knows-who.

  17. Re:exeem is cack by phlyingpenguin · · Score: 1

    I'm confused. I have the official Exeem 0.20 installed and Cydoor is NOT on my machine. Does it only install if you select the install ie toolbar option? Do we really need a hacked installer just for that?

  18. hosts file by dnmax · · Score: 1

    i can modify/create a hosts file myself, thank you.

  19. Re:I thought.... by Frightcrawler · · Score: 2, Informative

    Have you not seen what lowkee did at LokiTorrent?
    He raised 30k last month and 10k this month.

  20. If you hate the spyware, why support the network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it's because you want to take advantage of the # of users, have you considered that they are primarily the type of users that install spyware-ridden software on their PCs? Is that the type of user community you want to get files from, and share with?

    What good reason is there to use eXeem? If you want to use a popular program that a lot of people use, what problem does eXeem solve that Kazaa doesn't?

    Is eXeem supposed to be considered the second coming strictly because Suprnova shut down? Anybody who relied strictly on Suprnova for torrents was a fool, anyway, considering the wake of Napster and the obvious fate of any popular centralized source of illicit IP.

    If you like the BitTorrent system... keep using it, eXeem offers no real advantages. If you have no integrity or circumspectness whatsoever, then just use Kazaa. I don't see what niche eXeem fills.

  21. A bit biased? by b00stA · · Score: 2, Informative

    the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor.

    Check your sources.
    eXeem does not come with a bunch of spy/adware. It comes with exactly one: Cydoor. Which is adware, only displaying ads.

    --
    Stop making that big face!
    1. Re:A bit biased? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      For now. A company willing to bundle adware is just a step away from bundling spyware, and I'm just not willing to trust them not to take that step. I'll wait until somebody comes up with a good, fast, anonymous, encrypted, OPEN P2P protocol with an open sourced cross-platform client like Azureus. That'll happen soon or later, if it hasn't already.

      I mean, Bram Cohen is one smart cookie, and had user anonymity been one of his design goals (it wasn't) I have no doubt that the **AAs would be having a much tougher time of it. What is needed is a open protocol that supports decentralized searching ala Gnutella and anonymous, encrypted swarming.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:A bit biased? by b00stA · · Score: 1

      I fully agree with you.
      I only wanted to point out that the article was wrong about the amount of ad/spyware.

      --
      Stop making that big face!
  22. Not FOSS by offerk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    eXeem lite is spyware free and free of bloat -- and free

    This isn't Free (libre) software, so while it is nice that it doesn't cost anything, neither does the official eXeem, so it is not better in that respect.

    As for the claim that the official version comes with spyware and that this "lite" version doesn't - several posters have already said they couldn't find any spyware after installing eXeem.
    As for eXeem-lite, if I can't see the source, why should I believe the site that claims it is spyware-free? Because the say so?

    --
    I learn from all my mistakes, I intend to be a genius at the end of my life.
    1. Re:Not FOSS by Barny · · Score: 1

      It does use an internalized cydoor (upon execution the program behaves as if cydoor was running) that DLs ads and sends some info back to cydoor servers.

      Looks like they just useing cydoor to display the ads and get revinue, now if only they would offer a paid adware free version...

      --
      ...
      /me sighs
  23. Re:exeem is cack by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    the same with me.
    i noticed a little white area in the program windows, and it seems thats were ads are supposed to be shown, but cydor isnt present.

    maybe thats one of the bugs that need fixing...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  24. Uhm... Why do they bother with eXeem at all? by vitalyb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sure, it is much HYPED app. But I've yet to hear about how great it actually is. Who even said it will catch and deliver? Why eXeem lite and not X lite, when X can be any ad-sponsored program on ZeroPaid?

    And while we on it. Why so many Slashdot articles on this? Promote it when eXeem is worth it.

    1. Re:Uhm... Why do they bother with eXeem at all? by Admiral+Burrito · · Score: 1

      It must be great, because the authors are hardcore protocol geeks who know how to create a good network. You can tell because they used to run a web site. </sarcasm>

  25. In my language Exeem mean... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In my language(danish, but it's probably the same n swedish and norwegian) eXeem is pronounced 'eksem' - which means 'Rash'.

    Seems like they chose an appropiate name.

    1. Re:In my language Exeem mean... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      Same with english, if you just throw an 'a' on the end("eczema"). eXeema.

  26. Re:Dupe! by true_majik · · Score: 1

    except. they aren't dupes. one is a lite version and the other isn't. the one that is lite is free from spyware. the one that isn't lite is loaded with it. this new article is about the release of the lite verson. the one you linked to is about the one that is not "lite"...so how is it a dupe?

  27. It's funny by u-238 · · Score: 1

    how the official eXeem tells its users how important it is to have the ads, saying that 'without them we can't afford to exist' or something along those lines.

    Do they honestly not know their audience?

  28. or you can just use this dummy cydoor file by kritikal · · Score: 2, Informative

    you can neuter most cydoor apps using the dummy cd_clint.dll files from here. Using these, the apps will still run but no more ads! My boss had installed a GRE word prep program and it didn't work after I cleaned up with AdAware (kept saying cd_clint.dll not found or something). I replaced it with this and everything was a-okay!

    1. Re:or you can just use this dummy cydoor file by King_TJ · · Score: 1

      Umm.... yes, but IMHO, this is still just a band-aid; not a real solution.

      It might stop the ads, but the app itself is still there, wasting CPU cycles in the background, checking those files to see if there's a new ad to display on your screen.

      If Ad-Aware didn't do a complete clean-up, it's probably best to try a different removal tool. (I suspect the new Microsoft Anti-Spyware beta would fix this for you, in fact.)

  29. No worries by LuSiDe · · Score: 1

    The protocol is already being analyzed and various details are already reverse engineered. If this information is known then a programmer can easily add functionality to Azureus (which is more or less similar to eXeem already, but uses Java hence is actually cross-platform). Only drawback is that it'll take a little while and your favorite client might not have it first. I'd say: no worries on this one.

    --
    WE DON'T NEED NO BLOG CONTROL.
  30. Ban users from the network ? Implications... by Animaether · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wait... if they have the ability to 'ban (lite) users from the network', then they have the ability to 'ban individuals engaging in the act of distributing copyrighted works without prior permission to do so'.

    Which means that they would become a prime target for whichever media copyright maintenance agency applies to them.

    Unless I'm missing something.

    1. Re:Ban users from the network ? Implications... by sabNetwork · · Score: 1

      One word:
      Kazaa

      Did it work for them?
      No.

  31. So the original version did have spy/adware! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    ... the official version of eXeem comes chock full of spy/adware -- specifically, cydoor ...

    This is the reason why I don't use P2P clients. It's very nice of them to release a "lite" (spy/adware free) client. Sheesh...

  32. Re:exeem is cack by duck_oil · · Score: 1

    I've read on here that you can remove cydoor with Spybot S&D and exeem will run as normal albeit with no spyware.

  33. You're not wrong. by clymere · · Score: 1

    I work tech support for a company that provides internet in hotel rooms across the country. You're not wrong. Generally people tend to be very relieved when they get a "computer guy" on the phone, and will bug them about anything and everything because hey...i called you about my computer, right? Meanwhile i've got 3 other people on hold. Ugh.

    --
    once you go slack, you never go back
  34. Re:exeem is cack by phlyingpenguin · · Score: 1

    Are you sure? I've looked around after some folks have said things about the privacy statement and some of the spyware removal tools. There's something very odd because I do not have anything to block it from installing Cydoor and I do not have Cydoor installed after installing it. I've grabbed a few of the mentioned removal apps to check and they do not find it nor do the dlls or registry entries exist. The only possible option to change the installation other than a freak bug (what spyware company would ship with a bug that prevents it from installing, really) is the toolbar option. I would submit that it is indeed that toolbar option as the privacy statement does quote:

    "Ads that might appear outside Exeem.com and eXeem&#153; application are Opt-out ads, that you have a chance to uninstall. Outside Exeem.com and EXeem&#153; application is eXeem's Toolbar LookSmart."

  35. eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way! by Jagasian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way. It does not use the Bittorrent protocol nor an extension of it. It is yet another P2P application/network that is trying to captilize on an already popular application/network/protocol. Considering that it is closed source, Windows only, spyware stricken, and leeching off of Bittorrent's popularity, it would be wise to boycott eXeem.

    If you want to use a P2P application that combines the swarming of Bittorrent with distributed indexing, searching, and tracking, try one of the eDonkey apps such as aMule, eMule, eDonkey2000, etc. Many of them are open source, spyware free, and run on multiple platforms. Since the eDonkey network has been around for a long time, it is filled with a variety of content. However, Bittorrent is still the fastest P2P protocol for raw data transfer, so don't drop it, just find a few good torrent sites.

    1. Re:eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way! by danila · · Score: 1

      It's the flash crowd effect that was described in The Register's review covered on Slashdot earlier. The feature means that each file is shared as if it was the most important thing in the world. :) And, of course, only the select few can publish .torrents and files die relatively soon (between weeks and months).

      eDonkey2000, on the other hand, is tuned for long-term sharing. People are not "encouraged" by the application to stop sharing (implying they start sharing new files), so in addition to people downloading the latest blockbusters you have people downloading 3-year and 30-year old films (or music, books, etc.). There is no "focusing", that's why it is slow. Instead of BitTorrent's "share more of this file with other people in the swarm, get more of it very soon" you have queue-based downloading and credit system that were designed to encourage long-term sharing and downloading of rare files.

      It should be possible to modify the ed2k protocol/clients for better release distribution, adding some sort of swarming, but it doesn't seem to currently be a priority.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    2. Re:eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way! by danila · · Score: 1

      Check out this fascinating thread. Many eMule users "care" about what files they share and so support the "push" market model by determining the supply. You won't find many people who would proudly say "I shared "Spiderman 2" so that it spread better", but many would enjoy sharing rare, old and niche files. Because of this the eDonkey network is a much better library, but a worse content releasing system.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    3. Re:eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way! by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I will add to this and say that Exeem is not Suprnova reincarnated either. The company paid the creator to attach his name and grab the previous Suprnova userbase.

      This is just a new "kazaa", and frankly I won't be using it because what I liked about Suprnova so much was the organization, the moderation the editors did with the files, and the ability to see on the front page what recent things were added to which categories.

      I mean, its like when you walk into a Blockbuster and you don't know what you want. A lot of the time you just go to the New Release wall to see what you haven't seen yet, and then you check through the older stuff. Thats exactly how I used Suprnova, and until software comes along that can provide that, I'll continue using webpage based trackers (that don't have spyware).

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    4. Re:eXeem is NOT related to Bittorrent in any way! by zeromemory · · Score: 1

      It should also be mentioned that one of the more popular eDonkey clients for *nix, mldonkey, also functions as a Bittorrent client. The latest CVS of mldonkey also supports multi-network downloading.

      I'm pretty sure I once saw Win32 binaries of mldonkey out there, but I'm not sure if they are recent or have been updated at all.

  36. No Thanks by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Spyware infested and binary only... Why do i even want to touch it?

    Does it increase my anonymity? Does it increase available downloads?

    Really.. why do i care about such a beast when there are 'safer' alternatives ( for both my computer and my actions )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:No Thanks by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Only if i was on some neighbor's WIFI...

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  37. Re:exeem is cack by phlyingpenguin · · Score: 1

    Yes, the very latest updated and all. I've been trying to prove myself wrong about this issue since this article was posted. It seems that starting Exeem does trigger something internal that creates the adcache directory, but nothing is ever put into that directory. Before trying to detect it, there has been NO blocking of programs or servers on my network or on my local machine to stop it from downloading ads if it did have Cydoor working. As far as it goes, this machine isn't used a lot so it's fairly easy to see what is and isn't going on. It should also be a prime target for spyware since before now it did not have any protection for spyware installed. As far as Exeem goes, I see a white box in Exeem that I assume is for ads, but it doesn't actually display any.

  38. Re:ADWARE? by squall14716 · · Score: 1

    Spybot will find and remove it - only for eXeem to put it back next time you run it.

  39. Re:exeem is cack by jeffcm · · Score: 1

    I think you may be right - I have K-Lite installed, and Cydoor didn't come on my system either. I'm going to reinstlal Exeem WITH the Internet Explorer toolbar, and see if it goes on my system then.

    But if it dosen't, it must be the K-Lite fake DLL that does the trick.

  40. You're wrong. It is. by b00stA · · Score: 1

    eXeem uses libtorrent as the basis for the file downloads itself, which is a library to ease implementation of BitTorrent systems.
    However the tracker behaviour has been changed. It pretty much is a modified closed-source BitTorrent client now.

    --
    Stop making that big face!
    1. Re:You're wrong. It is. by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Just because it uses an API also used by some BitTorrent implementations means nothing. The protocols are incompatible and eXeem's protocol is closed. If two applications use STL, does that make them related? No it does not. The same applies to eXeem: yet another fame leech.

  41. How is it different from Kazaa/eDonkey/etc..? by stickyc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Due to the spyware, I'm not likely to install eXeem anytime soon, some questions to those who have:

    One of BitTorrent's strengths was that it was very difficult to spoof content. IE - If you trusted the tracker, you knew exactly what you were downloading. Given eXeem's new "everyone's a tracker" marketing, is it now vulnerable to spoofing? If a user posts a malicious file under an alternate name, what's to prevent everyone from downloading it? Are there safeguards to protect the network from being flooded with invalid files?

    Functionally, how is eXeem different from other P2P clients? My idea of what goes on is; You do a search across all files shared on the eXeem network, pick a file you like, and start downloading from peers. That's roughly the same thing with Kazaa, etc. What's the advantage of using eXeem?

    1. Re:How is it different from Kazaa/eDonkey/etc..? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

      There are webpages out there will the names of validated content files along with their size and MD5 sums. These websites are not illegal as they contain no content. However, if you trust the website, and assuming that eXeem allows you to get the MD5 sum of the file you want to download, then you can run a decentralized server system.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    2. Re:How is it different from Kazaa/eDonkey/etc..? by Jagasian · · Score: 1

      Sounds just like eDonkey, which has a slew of open source free clients for every OS. Furthermore, eDonkey has been around for years and has tons of content! eXeem is nothing more than a leech on Bittorrent's fame.

    3. Re:How is it different from Kazaa/eDonkey/etc..? by anethema · · Score: 1

      Basically libtorrent. Its just kazaa but you upload/download at the same time like in bittorrent. This SHOULD result in faster downloads since you should be able to saturate your download bandwidth if enough peers/seeds are connected to you.

      --


      It's easier to fight for one's principles than to live up to them.
    4. Re:How is it different from Kazaa/eDonkey/etc..? by mibus · · Score: 1

      Its just kazaa but you upload/download at the same time like in bittorrent

      So it's like Gnutella then? :-)

  42. Tinfoil hat time by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    If I were developing something like exeem, I'd have seen this coming a mile away and taken action from the very beginning of the design phase. Given how likely this neutering was, wouldn't it have made sense to put some obvious spyware in and then write a custom component, less blatant, that'd get shipped along with any 'lite' version once the obvious danger had been removed? In any case, I wouldn't want any program I had to fight with in order to make not attack me on my computer in the first place. Just one more person who's not going to touch this thing.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  43. Re:version 2 is already out by 2MuchC0ffeeMan · · Score: 1

    someone mod this down, it's a pay to view forum (lame/spam)

    --
    Runnin' On Empty .... I'm Still Alive
  44. It's NOT free.. by sudog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..until I can recompile it myself.

    1. Re:It's NOT free.. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      So, hold on a second.. a free sample at a grocery store isn't FREE because you didn't cook it yourself?

      That's.. a rather odd way of thinking.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:It's NOT free.. by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      ..until I can recompile it myself.

      No problem..

      You just gotta decompile it first.

    3. Re:It's NOT free.. by sudog · · Score: 1

      What an idiotic analogy. It's so tremendously idiotic, I'll waste only the time it takes to point that fact out before I move on to more worthwhile pursuits.

  45. re: clusterfuckorgy by Herr_Nightingale · · Score: 1

    nobody wants to see a crowd of sweaty homosexuals in spandex tights and padding prancing about trying to hump each other. That's disgusting. Here, have a pr0n

  46. dns block by praseodym · · Score: 1

    With a simple DNS block in my router (which I made for the KaZaA ads), the ads get replaced by black blocks. Cydoor is in the optional searchbar only.

  47. Re:You fools, Cydoor is not spyware... by issachar · · Score: 1
    He means to make the software revenue producing. If you check a dictionary it seems he's using the word a bit incorrectly, but I would have probably done the same thing.

    --
    . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
  48. Predicitons: by grolschie · · Score: 1

    Soon they will be charging for ExeemLite. You just wait. Earlier copies won't connect probably, you will have to upgrade.

    A slew of exeemlite.tk style sites will replace the old sites, advertizing free legal movie downloads when you *buy* their product. The earlier versions of ExeemLite will get harder and harder to find. And even when you do obtain a copy, all the mp3 files you find shriek distortion though your hi-fi system that you connected to your pc.

    And in the meantime, the original Exeem will release news that there latest edition does not install Spyware without user's *consent*, even though the EULA states the adware nasties are to be installed for delivery of advertizing.

  49. I think it's worth noting... by Low2000 · · Score: 1

    ... The wikipedia definition of Cydoor...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydoor/
    1. Re:I think it's worth noting... by Alphadrant · · Score: 1

      You need to take out the slash. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydoor

  50. Whois by Muttonhead · · Score: 1
    Who is exlite.net? And who is whoisguard.com? I didn't realize domain records could be private.
    $whois exlite.net
    [Querying whois.internic.net]
    [Redirected to whois.enom.com]
    [Querying whois.enom.com]
    [whois.enom.com]

    Registration Service Provided By: NameCheap.com
    Contact: support@NameCheap.com
    Visit: http://www.namecheap.com/

    Domain name: exlite.net

    Registrant Contact:
    WhoisGuard
    WhoisGuard Protected (bi8nam1y96.protect@whoisguard.com)
    +1.6613102107
    Fax: +1.6613102107
    8939 S. Sepulveda Blvd
    8939 S. Sepulveda Blvd
    Westchester, CA 90045
    US

    Name Servers:
    dns1.name-services.com
    dns2.name-services.com
    dns3.name-services.com
    dns4.name-services.com
    dns5.name-services.com

    Creation date: 19 Jan 2005 15:49:51
    Expiration date: 19 Jan 2006 15:49:51
  51. Exeem lite contains cydoor too! by freetolio · · Score: 1

    When running the MS Antispyware tool, I found Cydoor tried to edit my hostfile when eXeem lite was being installed. I'm staying away from this program for good.

  52. The funny thing is by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Often shady versions can be more reliable than legit stuff. How the thing is, for most people, this is in the same category as OSS. It's realeased by a group of people on the net, who knows their motivations? People love to scream about the safety of OSS but 99.0% of the people doing the screaming are doing it with their head in a bag since they either lack the ability to check the source, or just don't take the time. They are taking it on faith that the source is clean of bad shit, and that the binary on the site is a faithful compile of that source.

    Well, of course, you would tell me that you don't have to check it, because others have. Lots of other people have taken the time to check it carefully, so you don't have to worry. If there was something nasty in the source, they'd tell the world, and they've verified that the binaries are faithful productions of that code.

    Same thing applies here. People will install it, check it with virus scanners and anti-spyware utilities. Run an install logger that will tell you every file it installs and where, every registry change, etc. Then they'll look at that to see if there's any spyware. If not, they'll declare it to be ok. As with the OSS, it's a bunch of random strangers you don't know telling you it's ok. At a certian point, you fighure they can't all be lying.

    However you don't know for sure any more with OSS than you do with something like this. In both cases you are relying on experts you'll never meet telling you something you can't personally verify. I mean I trust people when they tell me Linux is safe. I trust that there aren't any backdoors. But how do I really know? Maybe there's a backdoor, along with a note in the source to come join the cabal that rules the Earth, and that's why no one has revealed it. Hell it could be that there's a backdoor in the compiler (http://www.acm.org/classics/sep95/) that exists only in the binary form, never in source. You don't really KNOW.

    So, as with many things in computers and online, you put your faith in the masses. You assume that competent people will check this out and will tell the truth about it. You assume if there is spyware in it, word will spread and you'll know. You assume it to be safe because it hasn't been proved unsafe. Bad method, maybe, but we use it all the time.

  53. "Bram should have used GPL!" etc. by NemosomeN · · Score: 1

    I think many of you fail to realize something. This is just me talking, but I don't think Bram Cohen gives a damn about GPL, or open software, or anything. He made BitTorrent as a resumé. He wanted it as widespread as possible, which includes having it as part of closed source projects as well. I don't imagine Cohen expected it to be this wildly popular, but his intent was to hopefully get a job in a bad job market. Feel free to correct me.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  54. actualy i dont seem to get cydoor when i install by novex · · Score: 1

    its most probably due to the fact that since i use firefox i locked down IE (disabled absolutely every feature etc i could) for both internet and local zones, then put the only sites i had to go to in IE as trusted sites.

    as a result it seems cydoor is no longer able to sneak itself onto my system hiding with other programmes installers, which is a pleasant side effect indeed.

  55. Re:Exeem plugin closed? by grub · · Score: 1


    eDonkey was a closed protocol, the eMule folks reverse engineered it and now we have a slew of wonderful open source clients for that network. In fact I don't know of anyone that uses the "authentic" eDonkey client.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  56. STSN? by KnarfO · · Score: 1

    Just curious...STSN?

    --


    "Creativity is allowing ones self to make mistakes. Art is knowing which ones to keep" - Scott Adams
    1. Re:STSN? by clymere · · Score: 1

      www.broadbandhospitality.com

      --
      once you go slack, you never go back
  57. eXeem banned from Suprnova forums by greylion3 · · Score: 1

    From suprnovaforums.net:

    "Hello everybody,
    It is with great sadness that I have seen this forum degenerate into a place for fighting and flaming between people about exeem and other things, well it stops right now.
    1. Exeem is history as far as this forum is concerned, this forum is about community above all else, that community will not be destroyed by infighting.
    2. Any topics regarding exeem will be locked or deleted, there is to be no more discussion of this app on this forum, period.
    3. As angry as I am about the flaming and insults I have seen normally level headed individuals partake in I will not be mass banning people. You have an amnesty for your words, from now on though you will not be so lucky so consider yourselves warned.
    4. The normal rules still apply, no links to torrents, torrent sites, cracks etc etc.
    This forum is no longer affiliated with exeem in any way shape or form, forget that and move on. Let peacefulness and playfulness reign (sic). Seriously though everybody just step back and think for a minute, the reason you are part of this forum is because we are the best, most informative, fun place to be. We are also the largest Invision board in the world, something you should all be proud of.
    All exeem forums are deleted and the word is filtered, normal service is now resuming."

    --
    Privacy begins with ..