Slashdot Mirror


The Evolution of Space Suit Design

William_Lee writes "According to space.com, it looks like we may finally be on the verge of seeing a long overdue, radical redesign of space suits that will result in much lighter, more maneuverable, custom fitted suits. Now if we can actually get around to sending someone to Mars..."

304 comments

  1. Do they come with darth vader sounds? by poographer · · Score: 1, Funny

    I am not your father's space suit.

    --
    Bumming Sigs since 1952
  2. Slice and dice by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

    . It is custom fitted to each astronaut using a laser scanning/electrospinlacing process.

    Do not look into the sun with your remaining eye.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Slice and dice by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Was it just me, or did anyone else read this:

      "Incorporated into that second skin would be electrically actuated artificial muscle fibers to enhance human strength and stamina." ....and find it a bit far fetched (not as in "technically impossible", but more like "budgetarily infeasible"?). I half expected the article to continue "... controlled by a network of mind-reading sensors, and integrated into the comm system of the nanomachines cleansing their bodies of toxins, while being able to merge with their amorphous bio-base that reshapes itself to their every whim ..."

      Seriously, though: just looking at how difficult large-scale human-assisting robotics has been to produce without it underreacting or overreacting, I don't hold out much hope of seing this sort of thing any time soon.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    2. Re:Slice and dice by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As the 'skin' is sprayed on, the fibers could be electrically or magnetically aligned prior to the skin solidifying. Fibers embedded in the skin could be designed to run through them, and a computer could send signals through the skin learning the fiber map. This would then allow the computer to take in signals through the fiber network of stress applied to the skin, and send out signals to those locations as needed, boosting the strength there.

      This leaves a lot of questions open (how to handle cross-talk, for instance), but is how I first thought of things. They're talking about this kind of thing being perhaps decades away, and unlikely to appear in the next few years. One day, we'll look back on astronauts in current spacesuits the way we look at warriors in plate armor: bulky and inefficient suits worn by people dedicated and brave enough to train to face the unknown with primitive technology.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:Slice and dice by Rei · · Score: 1

      > the fibers could be electrically or magnetically aligned

      Yes. It's an additional problem (along with several others) that large-scale systems don't have, and we can't even get the large scale systems to work right and still be lightweight, durable, reasonable-cost, etc.

      I don't think we should give credence to something like this when we can't even manage very well on a system where you can actually physically place and test your actuators.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    4. Re:Slice and dice by shokk · · Score: 1

      Spray on suits?!?! We are just begging for horrible things to happen to these people by pressing clothes to the limits of physics. "How about I stay really really safe and wear the Apollo era suit, and you guys spray that stuff on yourselves and make sure you cover every freakin micrometer of exposed skin."

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
    5. Re:Slice and dice by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      That's where the article started to lose me as well, just more pie in the sky dreaming about what would be cool with little basis in reality or what's in development. I mean I don't really care if stuff like this get's posted as a "news" story, but I do tire of the breathless copy that makes it sound like this stuff will be hitting shelves anytime now.

    6. Re:Slice and dice by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Funny
      Spray on suits?!?! We are just begging for horrible things to happen to these people by pressing clothes to the limits of physics

      If by "horrible", you mean "life threatening", then I don't know about that. But if by "horrible" you mean, "the utter agony upon removal of the suit when every single hair on your body is ripped out one by one", then yes, I agree completely.

    7. Re:Slice and dice by dalyraptor · · Score: 1

      [I]Spray on suits?!?! We are just begging for horrible things to happen to these people by pressing clothes to the limits of physics.[/I] Lol, you is a silly, silly, person.

    8. Re:Slice and dice by dalyraptor · · Score: 1

      Now I am silly for using square brackets and forgetting line breaks, ouch.

    9. Re:Slice and dice by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Large-scale systems have other problems, like interconnects that can leak, suits that must be custom-fit, joints that limit mobility, and gloves that have little to no sense of touch. Just because one technology is difficult doesn't mean that we should scrap ideas for others.

      Besides, the technology is likely decades off.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    10. Re:Slice and dice by Spassvogel · · Score: 1

      actually, with the lighting and colors, all they need is the disco music and it'd be a NASA remake of the MMX tv ads

      (aaagh....with windows running the spaceship...wait, i think a website did a story on gates sending monkeys to mars...another case of life following satire?)

    11. Re:Slice and dice by kieran · · Score: 1

      Would super-tight suits still be any good for waste removal?

      "Always turn away from the camera when evacuating your bowels - the last thing the public wants to see is the turtles head popping out."

  3. Now all we need ... by odaen · · Score: 1

    Is that set of day glow orange moonboots.

    1. Re:Now all we need ... by papercrane · · Score: 1

      And a shiny gold suit

    2. Re:Now all we need ... by Bob+of+Dole · · Score: 2, Funny

      With cufflinks.

    3. Re:Now all we need ... by pelrun · · Score: 1

      Just make sure we don't pass any mirrors - if we do, I'm there for the day.

  4. Evolution of Space Suite design.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just watch the latest Missy Elliot music video.

  5. We aren't going to send humans to Mars any time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    soon, but we shouldn't let that get in the way of fashion. I say we should make a rover catwalk.
    Yeah baby, shake that spectrometer, OWWW!
    I apologize profusely.

  6. Re:Going to Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about, y'know, the Moon? That's, what, 385,000 km away?

  7. Re:Going to Mars? by SunPin · · Score: 1

    And how long ago was that? The space program has severe atrophy.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  8. These pictures get worse and worse. by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I heard tt can be quite difficult to get that stuff off your hands...

    2. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by dakara · · Score: 3, Funny

      Someone should tell space.com that encoding the whole article in the url is not the way to do things :-)

    3. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...

      shudder

      Who the heck the designed that page?

    4. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by wizzardme2000 · · Score: 0

      LOL, CSS as its finest. Now if only space.com had cookies worth stealing...

      --

      Toast lands jelly down. If you jelly both sides of a piece of toast, it will hover in a state of quantum indecision.
    5. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    6. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO Wow, i didn't even see the caption option in the URL. Made me laugh for a while

    7. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Thank you SO much for pointing that out, this is going to be fun!

    8. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      Man! These guys are all going to be wearing TRON costumes, for everyone's "enjoyment".

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    9. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Actually the shudder one had the code for the goatse image.

      It just got cut out by the slashdot lameness filter it seems.

      Put the img tag in there it works...

    10. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Especially with the help of Tinyurl...

    11. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something even worse.

      Whoever designed it should be shot.

    12. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Thats what the shudder link lead to.

      It seems that slashdot killed it in my post.

    13. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      Thank you SO much for pointing that out, this is going to be fun!

      Oh? You've got some of those gloves, do you?

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    14. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      i've had the shivers from tinyurls ever since i came across goatse*. But that, sir, is a fine idea. I was just thinking about trying to feed some hex to img_display.php to obfuscate it a bit. was just thinking about using these scripts to create narratives. tinyurl would be the way to go.

      What's the googlism again? inurl:img_display.php or something. This could be this weeks online security cam finder. [hmm, maybe google' becoming a meme engine...] I was thinking of trying to spot more of these scripts loose on the web and writing some poetry. Haiku maybe, since it's tinyurl.

      btw, your link just timed out.

      * it only happened once. But it sure makes you look at those links twice. i had this idea once to write a moz toolbar to check tinyurls and create a very tiny png representation of any images found therein. Never did anything about it. Though i've just now thought of making a little 16pix goatse. Make a great favico for the right site.

      That image burns itself so bad, i probably wouldn't even need to work from the original.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    15. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by hostyle · · Score: 1
      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    16. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by Mike1024 · · Score: 1

      Or, indeed, one could do this.

      You know, if one wanted to...

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    17. Re:These pictures get worse and worse. by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Also, there could be this

  9. Someone has to say it... by bwcarty · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you like your quasi-futuristic clothes Mr. Powers? I designed them myself.

    1. Re:Someone has to say it... by Erris · · Score: 1
      Do you like your quasi-futuristic clothes Mr. Powers? I designed them myself.

      He would be the designer. He had a ritualistically shaved scrotum which would not be harmed by a spray on second skin. Looks like a TBHW (Total Body Hot Wax) for every one else.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  10. Fix problems first. by Bite-lover · · Score: 2, Funny

    A redesigned suit? How about before they do that they come and fix my toaster. It's been shooting toast at me for years because NASA reprogrammed it for 'defense from hungry aliens' If they can't fix my damn toaster, what makes them think a redesign will help?

    --
    Bite me. Seriously, I enjoy it.
    1. Re:Fix problems first. by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      I've been saying it for years; how come we can send a man to the moon but we can't fix bite-lover's toaster?

    2. Re:Fix problems first. by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      To be fair some crackpots say that Bite-Lover's toaster is a hoax.

  11. Re:Going to Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    How about, y'know, the Moon? That's, what, 385,000 km away?


    The sad part is that we couldn't pull that off again today if we tried. We no longer have the will/ability.

  12. About time.. by jmcmunn · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I was actually just watching an IMAX Nasa special the other day and was shocked to hear that the current space suits weigh in at almost 250lbs!! I know that without gravity, it doesn't matter how much you weigh, but the bulk in those suits seriously made it hard for the astronauts to do their job at times.

    A new "second skin" version of the suit would certainly make it easier on the astronauts, and would free up a ton of space for hauling more cargo up there as well.

    On a side note, Nasa was testing this cool 100ft solar array in the movie, which when folded up fit into a 7 inch tall box! It was pretty cool.

    1. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even without gravity it matters how much you weigh. All that mass has momentum, making it that much harder to slow down or speed up. Also, just imagine what it's like walking around in a microgravity environment - you only weigh 5 pounds, but when you turn a corner your body keeps moving with the momentum you know and love on Earth. You have to lean extremely far in the opposite direction to counter your momentum. Space suits make it that much worse.

    2. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that's not that impressive if the box is also 51 feet long!

    3. Re:About time.. by s0m3body · · Score: 4, Informative

      it DOES matter even in space

      being free of gravity does not mean being free of inertia

    4. Re:About time.. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I was actually just watching an IMAX Nasa special the other day and was shocked to hear that the current space suits weigh in at almost 250lbs!!
      So? I SCUBA dive for fun, and for the dive I like the most, under-ice diving, the drysuit, the underwear, the weights (because the suit floats), the tanks and the rest of the diving gear weight a full 100 pounds. And when you ice dive, you suit-up a long way from the hole, to which you have to walk with the gear on, and when you wear it all around you and on your back, you don't really feel it. So 250 pounds is not going to be that much of a burden, for somebody as fit as an astro-nut...
    5. Re:About time.. by Fruvous · · Score: 1

      Even without gravity you're mass still matters. It takes a force to accelerate any mass, thank you Sir Issac Newton. A less massive suit will be far less cumbersome. I can't say that I know fatiuge is an issue, but it could most deffinatelly help if it is.

      --
      This is one of those witty signatures that you'll remember.
    6. Re:About time.. by Dausha · · Score: 3, Funny

      "And when you ice dive, you suit-up a long way from the hole, to which you have to walk with the gear on, and when you wear it all around you and on your back"

      Or, you could lay on your back and let somebody push you to the hole. After all, it is ice . . . :-)

      --
      What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
    7. Re:About time.. by demachina · · Score: 1

      New space suits would be cool I guess, but I'm kind of left wondering what exactly these will be used for other than the occasional turn around the ISS before the Bush administration mothballs it and the space shuttle.

      I see Boeing and Northrop have teamed for the CEV leading to the inevitable result of every NASA contract competition, a team led by Boeing competeing against one led by Lockheed, assuming they don't either collude or spy on one another as is theire history.

      So, I assume maybe these suits will be used for the CEV and maybe landing on the moon 20 years from now if its not cancelled first, when it becomes obvious the U.S. is so deeply in debt it can't afford it.

      I sure wish there would be a real maverick CEV team lead by Burt Rutan and T/Space but it appears inevitable it will be the same old, same old pork going to Boeing and Lockheed and T/Space will have to partner with and be swallowed by one of them.

      If you read the description in the link of what the Crew Exploration Vehicle is, it sure sounds to me like they are going to spend 10-15 years to basicly redevelop Apollo. Considering it took less than a decade the first time you'd think they would do it in slightly less time, not way more time this time around, especially with better computers, more experience etc.

      Lockheed is a fascinating study in the giant corporations that run the U.S. government ... err ... excuse me work for the U.S. government. By one counting the average tax payer in the U.S. pays $228 dollars just to Lockheed in a year. The F-22 fighter has turned in to the most expensive and delayed fighter aircraft in history, at maybe $300 million a copy.

      All in all the CEV just sounds like yet another avenue for redistributing our tax dollars to Lockheed and Boeing and it will probably never fly anything useful. Maybe the will make it to the moon briefly just so people wont be completely pissed over the billins spent on it and then just like Apollo everyone will be wondering what the point is, and why we are spending so much money on it. Unless we develop fusion power first, which would be a better use for the money, and are mining fuel for it from the Moon I'm really at a loss as to what going to he moon again would be good for except as a stunt.

      Mars is a far more worthwhile place to go, and put a permenent colony, but its pretty much an unattainable goal due to the simple fact that NASA/Boeing/Lockheed budgets are so extravagantly wasteful that we will never be able to afford it.

      --
      @de_machina
    8. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quite true. I made some 'medieval armour' and the first question I always get is about its weight (well, some ask if they can stab me with a knife, but I meant semi-normal people), I usually wear it without any padding because of the heat, and even then it takes a whole day of walking around with the thing for me to get slightly sore. Oh, and it's not even a good design, which would use several resting points instead of just the shoulders like mine.

    9. Re:About time.. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Er, no. Ice on a lake is covered by snow, through which you have to walk...

      And when you walk back, you're wet and dripping (and the water freezes on your suit which becomes rigid) and the water makes the snow stick on you and you end up with huge snowboots that become heavier with each step...

      It's a good thing it's fun, otherwise I wouldn't do it... :)

    10. Re:About time.. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I've been dying to try it, but I cannot find anyone I trust enough to hold the rope...

    11. Re:About time.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that without gravity, it doesn't matter how much you weigh

      Without gravity, you weigh nothing.

      Another gradu^H^H^H^H^Hvictim of America's public school system, I presume?

    12. Re:About time.. by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      I gotta say that sounds scary as hell, but if you find it fun, more power to you. I like seeing movies from under the ice, but I would not want to be there.
      He's right about the weight though. I'm about to start taking up backpacking and hiking. I've got a fair amount of the equipment now, and my pack is amazing. It doesn't way anywhere near 250lbs, but you really feel how heavy it is when you lift it. Once you put it on though, the weight disappears. It's actually loose so I can put my finger under the shoulder straps. The weight is mostly on my hips.

    13. Re:About time.. by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Yeah a good pack well loaded can make a huge difference. Try it with a mere 15-20lbs (8-10kgkg) just tossed into a cheap pack though any distance at all kills you.
      I'm shure did some good research on how to distribute that mass and reduce astronaut wear and tear.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    14. Re:About time.. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Well, if that's the case, you have a very serious problem. Either you're paranoid beyond hope, or you dive with extremely unsavoury people...

    15. Re:About time.. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      The weight **HAS TO BE** on the hips. Otherwise, you're going to break your back. The shoulder straps are only there to prevent the bag from swaying from side to side or backwards; if the shoulder straps are not loose, you have a problem.

    16. Re:About time.. by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I'm primarily a solo diver, or when boat diving, I do a lot of "same day, same ocean" diving. I've trained at it, and have the equipment to do it as safely as possible, but ice diving and cave/wreck diving is quite different... Not paranoid, but I just don't know any dive buddies well enough to trust them with my life...

    17. Re:About time.. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      Dunno what to say, but I've been diving since 1974 and I've never seen such an extreme case as you.

      Maybe you oughta take up cave-diving...

  13. "Suits you well" by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tight-fitting suits may mean that astronauts are more likely to get turned on, resulting in all kinds of mayham and soap operas. Space can get lonely. Maybe the baggy look is better afterall.

    1. Re:"Suits you well" by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      Maybe it'll be like star trek. Not that I've been looking, but has anybody seen an officer get a stiffy?

      --
      I don't get it.
    2. Re:"Suits you well" by MarkMcLeod · · Score: 0

      Well, atleast you won't need to remember to bring contraception. You can spray on some of that second skin, and hump for days. If it can withstand the martian surface, it can withstand my girlfriends...well..yah know.

    3. Re:"Suits you well" by deft · · Score: 1

      Eww.

      Because in space when you scream (in estacy), theres nowhere for it to go.

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    4. Re:"Suits you well" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just hope the second skin suit has some built in elasticity where it counts..would hate to have all the air sucked up because his suit broke when hers turned him on. ;-)

    5. Re:"Suits you well" by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, you've got it all wrong. Skin-tight high-tech suits drastically increase the odds that we'll see preteens enagage in armed combat inside giant robots blasphemously created from heavenly beings, leading to a really cryptic apolcalypse, any day now.

      --
      People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
    6. Re:"Suits you well" by Kryxan · · Score: 1

      so the idea is a suit that is completly custom fitted for one individual, right? well im wondering what would happen is that person put on 10lbs, suddenly their suit wont fit anymore and they cant perform the mission? i really hope that they abandon this idea of a skin tight suit that has to be custom fitted for each person. not to mention the whole idea of a single layer, no matter how strong it is, is just a bad idea as well. although this research could lead to some truely great advances, i dont see its goal as the best result.

    7. Re:"Suits you well" by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a stiffy, but I have seen camel toe on Counsellor Troy in an episode of ST:TNG

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    8. Re:"Suits you well" by swimin · · Score: 1

      Just turn the tempeture down a few degrees and you won't have a problem. I swim - trust me, when's the last time you've ever seen a guy in a speedo with one? Think back, was he in the water.

    9. Re:"Suits you well" by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't believe no one has made the obvious joke: "Spray-on body suits? Quick, send Natalie Portman into space!"

    10. Re:"Suits you well" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tight-fitting suits may mean that astronauts are more likely to get turned on, resulting in all kinds of mayham and soap operas. Space can get lonely. Maybe the baggy look is better afterall.

      Am I the only one who misread that as "mayonnaise and soap hophas" or am I just peverted?

    11. Re:"Suits you well" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      so the idea is a suit that is completly custom fitted for one individual, right? well im wondering what would happen is that person put on 10lbs, suddenly their suit wont fit anymore...

      Most astronauts are highly disciplined that way. Plus, I think Space Command would catch a weight trend early. A bigger problem may be sickness that leaves one too skinney.

    12. Re:"Suits you well" by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, good thing you're here, doin' all the thinking for everybody. I'm sure those guys at NASA have never thought of those issues.

      Whew! That was a close one!

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    13. Re:"Suits you well" by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      If it can withstand the martian surface, it can withstand my girlfriends...well..yah know.

      Oh, I wouldn't assume that. The Martian surface is dry and cold, but your girlfriend's you-know is...

      Wait. Blow-up doll?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    14. Re:"Suits you well" by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      One can only imagine what space exploration will be like if Jerry Ryan models the spray on version of a "second skin" type of space suit. Ooooooooooh-my.

    15. Re:"Suits you well" by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      One can only imagine what space exploration will be like if Jerry Ryan models the spray on version of a "second skin" type of space suit. Ooooooooooh-my.

      Gives a whole new meaning to "space probe"

  14. I can see it now... by rob_squared · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the first medical accident when someone thinks this stuff is aerosol cheese.

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:I can see it now... by game+kid · · Score: 1

      But a sandwich isn't a sandwich without the tangy zip of Spacesuit Whip.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:I can see it now... by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      All hail the first breakfast burrito in space!

      (not that the McDonalds kind needs any protection to withstand vacuum)

      --
      I don't get it.
    3. Re:I can see it now... by game+kid · · Score: 1
      All hail the first breakfast burrito in space!

      Congratulations, you are the proud owner of my brand new signature.

      Enforce your copyright(left?) appropriately.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  15. The reason why its not yet implemented by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MIT says the biggest problem with the suits is bowl movements. As one researcher put it:

    "We spray these guys like shrink wrap and then 5 minutes later he has to take a dump. Now what?"

    1. Re:The reason why its not yet implemented by hey · · Score: 1

      What's the big deal about moving bowls?
      Dishes, bowls and plates should be easy to move in these suits!

  16. Yeah... OK by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1
    Future space explorers may apply a "spray-on" second skin, an organic, biodegradable layer offering protection in extremely dusty planetary environments. Incorporated into the second skin will be electrically actuated artificial muscle fibers to enhance human strength and stamina.

    They may? Right in the spray right? must come out like protein noodles. That or the mussles and the electronic traces are assembled by nanomachine in the spray. I'll get right on that, You can spray that on someone else.

    1. Re:Yeah... OK by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      We have stuff like that now.

      Some primers when painted on a wall will plasticize with little threads running through them to support the paint.

    2. Re:Yeah... OK by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 1

      So spray it on your skin then... My point is, I'd rather take the risk of having dusty hands and not having the grip of ten men then put this stuff on my skin.

  17. Re:Mission To Mars by drivinghighway61 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes, with Lord Bush's leadership, we can finally bring Democracy(c) to Mars!

  18. Warning! by EdwinBoyd · · Score: 5, Funny

    This article contains material on spacesuit evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of spacesuits. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered.

    1. Re:Warning! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Glad that was banned in Georgia. One could guess that since scientists didn't (to our knowledge) exist 65 million years ago, that it's a theory.

      Either that or they'll consider it common sense, which wouldn't be too good.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Warning! by IronicCheese · · Score: 3, Funny

      HEY! I'm a believer in Intelligent Design of Spacesuits, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Warning! by vandoravp · · Score: 1

      The design better be intelligent. Don't want a suit designed by a dummy.

    4. Re:Warning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm. A wetsuit, a fishbowl and some duct tape ought to do the trick.

    5. Re:Warning! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      So they weren't designed in Georgia, I guess.

    6. Re:Warning! by metlin · · Score: 1

      I *am* from Georgia, you insensitive clod x-(

  19. Radiation protection by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A thin layer of biomaterial may be sufficient for protecting you from the vacuum of space if they get around the engineering considerations, but I for one would not want a "second skin" as my only protection from radiation and cosmic rays.

    This is a consideration particularly where there is no atmosphere absorbing any of it before it gets to you (eg the moon and Earth orbit). The Earth also has its magnetic field helping shield us.

    Also consider that the thinnner and lighter a material is the more likely a rip becomes. That one rip will easily end your life. You'd need to incorporate a system self repair of small holes and tears - perhaps a gluey substance that seals under pressure.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Radiation protection by m0rphin3 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From TFA:
      "..an astronaut first donning his or her customized elastic Bio-Suit layer. Then a hard torso shell would be slipped on, sealed via couplings located at the hips. A portable life support system is then attached mechanically to the hard torso shell and provides gas counter pressure. Gas pressure would flow freely into the wearer's helmet and down tubes on the bio-suit layer to the gloves and boots"


      The thin 'second skin' is augmented by a hard torso shell, and the oxygen seems to go in tubes, most likely these will also be reinforced, so ripping or tearing does not seem very likely.

      I get a mental image of something like an Imperial Stormtrooper , IIRC the costume was something like a scuba suit underneath with white plastic 'armor' on top..

      Hmm, possibly George Lucas can get 'prior art' on this..:)

      --
      for great justice
    2. Re:Radiation protection by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Hey, that holds huge potential for the condom industry! Just think -- like Tang, freeze-dried ice cream, and Velcro, condoms can be revolutionised by NASA!

      p

    3. Re:Radiation protection by syousef · · Score: 1

      Two points

      1) Some radiation in space (ie at its normal strength) can only be blocked by a suitable thickness of material. A _thin_ hard shell won't offer much protection. When there's a solar storm for example astronauts cease all EVA activity and go to the most heavily shielded area of the craft/space station.

      2) Space is a difficult environment to work in. Rips and tears are actually quite likely. Take a look at the servicing missions for hubble. Many hours in a single EVA performing complex repairs using lots of tools (power and otherwise). Want to take a leak? Consider your spacesuit your nappy. Astronauts have a long difficult, uncomfortable job in an unfamiliar environment. Want to bet their life that they won't make a mistake that will tear their suit?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Radiation protection by m0rphin3 · · Score: 1

      So make a thick shell. And if they go for shelter in a solar storm anyway, you don't need all that much protection, do you?

      Have you tried ripping or tearing Nomex or Kevlar lately? Neither has to be very thick before tearing it takes a bit of force.

      While surfing I also found this: Tyvek which I'd never heard about, but apparently is quite thin and is used in hazardous biological environments.
      A rip or tear could be just as fatal in such an environment, but thousands of professionals wear this stuff every day, so I guess the danger must be slight..

      --
      for great justice
    5. Re:Radiation protection by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Provided that the material is designed so that small tears do not spread and become large holes, a small hole is not a problem. The astronaut probably has about 5 psi (1/3 atmosphere) around his head, and over the rest of the body that 5 psi is provided by the suit. Skin can hold back 5 psi easily for hours at a time without damage. 5 psi is about what a baby suckles at. At worst, the astronaut with a small hole tight against the skin will get a hickey.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    6. Re:Radiation protection by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Somehow I would just be *SLIGHTLY* nervous about putting a laser down there ;)

    7. Re:Radiation protection by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...for example astronauts cease all EVA activity and go to the most heavily shielded area..."

      With the new dummy plug technology coming along nicely, this should hopefully be a thing of the past.

    8. Re:Radiation protection by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Hey, think of it as spray-on undies. You can wear your fashions over it. Think of it... Too Sexy For the Spacewalk...

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    9. Re:Radiation protection by mattdm · · Score: 1

      While surfing I also found this: Tyvek [dupont.com] which I'd never heard about, but apparently is quite thin and is used in hazardous biological environments.

      Next time you're driving by a new house being built, take another look. It's (at least in the last decade) standard practice to put a barrier layer of Tyvek (or other-branded equivalent) between the siding and insulation.

      Also, those hard-to-tear express-mail envelopes? Tyvek.

    10. Re:Radiation protection by keli · · Score: 1

      Velcro condoms?!!! Ouch!

    11. Re:Radiation protection by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I recall somebody in the know (a nasa employee) posting a story exactly like this to one of the space newsgroups.

      The astronaut in question had been training in a vacuum chamber and a tear opened in a glove. He didn't notice the damage until the end of the exercise, and the tightness of the glove meant that not much oxygen was lost. He wound up with a small injury on his hand which apparently healed ok

    12. Re:Radiation protection by luna69 · · Score: 1

      > While surfing I also found this: Tyvek which I'd
      > never heard about

      You're dating yourself. You must never have used 5.25" (or 8") floppies, as most of the millions of sleeves they came in were made of tyvek, often marked with the name.

      Ok, so maybe I'm dating MYSELF.

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  20. "Hard suits" might be useful for some jobs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -- they can be made equal-volume suits, so bending an arm or a leg won't have the resistance caused by changing the volume of air. Think high-tech plate armor.

    We might see Imperial Storm Troopers yet. :)

  21. One problem... by jemenake · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is it just me... or do the old suits look freakin' cool and the new ones look totally gay?

    The old ones look functional, with color-coded hose hook-ups and all... like a deep-sea diver... a deep-space diver, if you will.

    These new ones... jeez... you can tell if the guy's circumcised or not! Seeing as how an astronaut is probably more likely to encounter an alien being than the rest of us land-lubbers, I'd be very concerned if the first human the martians meet is dressed like a metrosexual.

    1. Re:One problem... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 1
      If Spandex was good enough for Buck Rogers, it's good enough for *my* ass.

      Besides, when I was a boy, we only had vacuum suits made from sabertooth-tiger leather, and we LIKED it.

    2. Re:One problem... by anaradad · · Score: 1

      Is it just me... or do the old suits look freakin' cool and the new ones look totally gay?

      Totally gay is a good thing. Be nicer.

    3. Re:One problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally gay is a good thing. Be nicer.

      No. I, for one, don't welcome gay looking space suit overlords. Thanks.

    4. Re:One problem... by Descartes · · Score: 1

      Here, here. I'm sick of hearing people use the word "gay" to mean "stupid".

      On topic. If these suits are skin tight it seems like you could wear whatever you want over them. I'd like to see an astronaut wearing a three piece suit over their space suite.

    5. Re:One problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea of shooting lawyers into space stems from them *not* wearing a space suit. Get with the program, man!

    6. Re:One problem... by type40 · · Score: 1

      Is it just me... or do the old suits look freakin' cool and the new ones look totally gay?
      Totally gay is a good thing. Be nicer.


      Speaking as member of the gay fetish comunty I'd have to agree with the parent on this one. The new suits look like something you would see the local gym bunnies prancing around in. The old style suits have a certin S&M quality about them.
      Look at this http://gralls.goalie.cx/ff/20002004/jul2304/jul230 4-02.jpg and tell me there's nothing homoerotic about it. (I know, it's not an extravehicular suit but it still makes the point)

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    7. Re:One problem... by luna69 · · Score: 1

      > Look at this and tell me there's nothing
      > homoerotic about it.

      That's it, I'm going to have to find my friends new spacesuits for the burn this year...

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
    8. Re:One problem... by type40 · · Score: 1

      New suits are hard to come by, but used russian suits can be had for a few grand each.
      US suits are hard to get. The only people I've seen with NASA or USAF suits "know someone".

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
  22. man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard slashdot was gay, but I never thought it was this bad.

    An article about space suits makes you think about boners. That's so gay.

    1. Re:man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are homophobic, seriously, get some help. Stop using the term gay as a derrogative

  23. Re:Going to Mars? by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure we do. It's only a couple days away; the technical problems for that sort of mission (which aren't too much greater than those for going to LEO) have already been dealt with. Sure, we no longer have any Saturn Vs, but we could build a rocket better and cheaper since we've done it before. Or, we could try to push the envelope (what NASA has been attempting to do for the past couple decades - unfortunately, without too much luck on complete systems, just lots of individual component successes) to try and advance launch tech to get costs seriously lower.

    Mars, on the other hand, is months away, which poses far bigger problems. We'll solve them eventually, of course, but it is a significantly bigger deal.

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  24. Re:Mission To Mars by burns210 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because he announced a plan doesn't mean anything. NASA isn't getting the funding(it needs massive increasesm not cutbacks) to actually DO any of the things talked about.

  25. Re:Mission To Mars by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2

    Maybe his plan is to send humans to Mars first, then to anger the Gua'uld to give humanity a common enemy....

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  26. Itchy Nose. by emjoi_gently · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There thing that would stop me from going into space in a new or old suit it small, but important (to me).
    What if I get an itchy nose?
    I know it sounds silly, but I'm serious. I can imagine getting a serious, claustrophobic panic attack in one of those things, of something as minor as that. Being trapped in this thing and unable to take it off.

    1. Re:Itchy Nose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorporated into that second skin would be electrically actuated artificial muscle fibers to enhance human strength and stamina just imagine. a skin tight suit and artificial muscles inhancing your strength and stamina. no need for condoms.

    2. Re:Itchy Nose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know you are kidding, but.....
      I attended a lecture given by Jim Lovell several years ago, and he actually addressed this point. He said that after NASA showed the space suits to the astronauts/engineers and some smart-ass asked your question.
      As a result NASA actually placed a small piece of abrasive ceramic inside of the helmet so an astronaut could simply move their head to the side and itch their nose.
      Lovell went on to say that to that day ('95 or so) that no one he knew of actually used it.

    3. Re:Itchy Nose. by bluyonder · · Score: 1

      The helmets have a small sponge mounted to the side so that, by turning your head, you can wipe off sweat (or scratch your nose).

    4. Re:Itchy Nose. by emjoi_gently · · Score: 1

      Actually less kidding than you think.
      The claustrophobia issues involved in being stuck in a suit like that for long periods of time would be quite real. (to me, anyway)

    5. Re:Itchy Nose. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      either learn to cope or don't go into space

      simple as that

      if astronaughts cant cope they will be weeded out long before they get into space.

  27. EVAs by timlee · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I think the most critical element for success will be the early creation of an effective, modular EVA system architecture"

    *Yawn*

    Let me know when they start developing Gundams.

  28. star trek by frankmu · · Score: 1

    again, star trek precedes real life... all we need are female vulcan astronauts.

    --
    Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    1. Re:star trek by FuturePastNow · · Score: 1

      And former Borg drones.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:star trek by luna69 · · Score: 1

      Vulcans and Borg drones are so nineties.

      What we really need are tall, sexy Cylons who look like, umm...Tricia Helfer.

      Oh, wait...

      --
      No gods, no demons, and no masters. Secular Humanism!
  29. Ironic? by notany · · Score: 2, Funny

    When somebody is talking so high on Bush it seems it's ment to be ironic. But I'm not sure on this one.

    --
    Dyslexics have more fnu.
  30. How much disinfo is out there? by thogard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you read official NASA stuff, you will find that the space suits are there to keep the guys warm in the cold of space. That is total BS. Put a self warming thing in a perfect insulator and what happens? It gets hot. It turns out that since the Russians haven't figured out how to make peltier effect space suits, that many of the details of the Apollo era suits are still secret. Even some of the details of early astronaut almost dying from dehydrating in their suits haven't been released

    One of the other things is that your blood will boil or explode in space. Thats not true either. All thats needed to protect the skin is a thin layer of something like a cheap wet suit. There have been studies that show thick rubber gloves would work fine for the pressure if there was a way to get rid of the sweat.

    The real mechanical problem is keeping the head protected along with proper containment of everything the body is trying to get rid of.

    Of course the real problem is all that radiation.

    1. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by Pyromage · · Score: 1

      What the fuck are you talking about? What perfect insulator? The suits aren't a perfect insulator, and no one has a perfect insulator yet. Put a self warming thing in an imperfect insulator and what happens? You probably get cold.

      Your blood won't boil? Bullshit. The temperature things boil at depends quite a bit on pressure. This is one of the reasons that many cake mixes and such have different directions for cooking at high altitude. How the hell do you think that rubber glove works? It works by *maintaining pressure*.

      The only thing you got right was the radiation. Honestly, who taught you that?!

    2. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by qbwiz · · Score: 1

      What perfect insulator? Space doesn't insulate very well at all against radiative heat loss. Why do you think that it gets colder at night than during the day?

      --
      Ewige Blumenkraft.
    3. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by drxray · · Score: 1

      I think the GP was referring to the fact that space is a pretty good insulator. Add sunlight and stuff can get fairly hot up there.

      A thick rubber glove *under tension* would provide an inward force that acts like air pressure and keeps your blood at ~an atmosphere of pressure, keeping your blood from boiling.

      Basically, the GP may be wrong, but not obviously so. No need to flame him.

      --
      Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
    4. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by algae · · Score: 1

      What perfect insulator? The suits aren't a perfect insulator, and no one has a perfect insulator yet.

      Dumbass, the vacuum of space is a damn-near perfect insulator. Ever hear of double-pane windows with a vacuum between the panes being a good insulator? Same idea. You're right about blood boiling in a lack of pressure, though.

      --
      Causation can cause correlation
    5. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Your blood won't boil? Bullshit.

      I recall reading that your skin is able to support the vapor pressure, enough to stop your blood from boiling. The problem is when you have cuts etc.

    6. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1

      The suits aren't a perfect insulator, and no one has a perfect insulator yet.

      Man goes into suit. Suit goes into space.

      A pretty total vacuum's in space. Vacuum's a pretty damned good insulator. The only way to cool things off in that environment is radiative cooling, unless you wanna also cart along a lot of some working fluid to boil off. Radiative cooling's damned inefficient. Take a human being, who's going to be generating more than 100 W if he's going any kind of useful work, and put him in a medium which precludes any cooling except radiative, and watch him overheat and die in pretty short order. The parent is right: the spacesuit's a lot more about cooling the astronaut than it is about heating him.

      Your blood won't boil? Bullshit

      You're a Hollywood-trained idiot. Your blood will not boil. Your body will not explode. There will be outgassing, but not so much as you think, and that's not the same thing as *boiling*, anyway; would you say that a deep-sea diver who ascends too fast ends up with his blood boiling? Of course you wouldn't, because outgassing isn't the same thing as boiling.

      The temperature things boil at depends quite a bit on pressure.

      Why, yes, yes it does.

      How the hell do you think that rubber glove works? It works by *maintaining pressure*.

      And how do you think it does that? Why, because it's elastic, right?

      Gee, what else is elastic? I know! The human body!

      Moron.

    7. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

      Actually, a porous fabric is good enough. All it has to do is hold in the gross pressure that the body will be exerting on it, skin can do the work of holding pressure on the sub-millimeter scale. The advantage to this technique is that sweat can evaporate through the suit, providing natural cooling. (Of course, this is a disadvantage too, since the spacecraft has to bring the extra water to replace the sweat.) A problem is providing a transition area around the helmet so that gasses don't escape in that region.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    8. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A vacuum is a good insulator -- against conduction and convection. It is the *worst possible* insulator against radiation. That's why thermoses are silvered inside. That's also why space, in the shade, feels fiercly cold to anything warm like humans. The warm thing is happily radiating away infrared, but space is too cold to give anything back.

    9. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by brassman · · Score: 1
      All it has to do is hold in the gross pressure that the body will be exerting on it, skin can do the work of holding pressure on the sub-millimeter scale.

      Yep. John W. Campbell described this suit in an editorial in Analog -- in 1969.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    10. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by thogard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your blood won't boil? Bullshit.

      The last I knew, the triple point for blood was close to the triple point of water. That means you have to get a very good vacuum. Fragile lung tissue can hold something in the order of two atmospheres for most people (some its as low as .1 which is why you need to exhale while ascending when diving). Maybe you forgot about membrane pressure.

      The guy who taught me most of this stuff was a life support system division head during the days Gemini and Apollo.

      If your thrown in space, the water in your pores will evaporate and cause frostbite in every pore of your body. The water in your eyes will do the same. As will your nasal cavity and sinuses. So if you can provide a low pressure containment for your head and a way to keep the water in your skin from evaporating quickly, you won't suffer any long term effects.

    11. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by dasunt · · Score: 1

      The problem is when you have cuts etc.

      Frostbite should take care of any cuts.

      Your ears, throat and anus should be able to hold in the pressure as well (no pun intended).

      Even if your eyelids are closed, I'm guessing you are going to suffer some serious damage to your sight which may be permanent. Plus there is that little issue with oxygen and solar radiation.

    12. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by clean_stoner · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If you read official NASA stuff, you will find that the space suits are there to keep the guys warm in the cold of space.

      That's only half correct. The spacesuits are designed to equilize heat distribution. In space any surface exposed to the sun gets very hot very quickly, and any surface in shade gets very cold very quickly. The current space suits have a water heating/cooling system made of many small tubes carrying water that gets heated up on the sun side and carries that warmth to the shade side, where it gets cooled off and flows back to the sun side, repeat ad infinitum.

      --

      Sigs are for the weak.

    13. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      "If you read official NASA stuff, you will find that the space suits are there to keep the guys warm in the cold of space. That is total BS."

      No, they're for temperature _regulation_.

      "One of the other things is that your blood will boil or explode in space. Thats not true either."

      If you put blood in space, it would boil if there was temperature input due to a lack of pressure. If there was no temperature input, it would freeze.

      "All thats needed to protect the skin is a thin layer of something like a cheap wet suit."

      You mean porous, non-protective neoprene which is generally used as an insulator by divers rather than it's ability to keep water away from the skin, which is why it's called a 'wet suit'?

      "There have been studies that show thick rubber gloves would work fine for the pressure"

      Lack of pressure...

      "The real mechanical problem is keeping the head protected along with proper containment of everything the body is trying to get rid of.

      Of course the real problem is all that radiation."


      Nice. But I think they real thing that we need to know is which school system let your parents down this badly?

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    14. Re:How much disinfo is out there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not talking about emptying a bag of blood into space, he's talking about the blood inside the human body ("your blood").

      He's correct about the wet suit. All that's really needed to keep your capilaries from bursting in a vacuum is some counter pressure, like what a wetsuit can provide.

      Again, he's correct with the terminology he was using about the rubber gloves. The pressure they provide would be sufficient.

      Do the basic research yourself before you assume someone else is incorrect.

  31. There's a lot of bits in that 250 pounds by imgunby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    it may be incredibly heavy by earth measure, but the suit also includes a personalized liquid cooling system, thermal protection for the extreme temperature differences between sun and shade, and a pretty serious amount of puncture protection. While it may not fit the bill for hiking across the mars terrain, it does offer some serious advantages over what sounds like an incredibly complex and complicated applied second skin. having worn one (attended space camp far too many years ago), i'd have to say that i much prefer it to a wet suit.

    1. Re:There's a lot of bits in that 250 pounds by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      Hey, you just gave me an idea... Speaking of the extreme difference between sun and shade: Why not make a large-surface-area peltier junction, paint one side matte black, and put an aluminum cooling fin on the other?

    2. Re:There's a lot of bits in that 250 pounds by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They do occasional change thier orientation relative to the sun.
      Also the heat sink would be pure radiative source, no convection, so you'd have to take that into account.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  32. Re:Mission To Mars by PacoTaco · · Score: 4, Funny
    I think the President has done a fantastic job in revitalizing our space program and command him for his decisive leadership and strong character.

    When did George Bush start posting to Slashdot?

  33. Forget New Space Suits by heptapod · · Score: 1

    Solve the problem of bone rot and muscular atrophy then work on creating vehicles to move people to LaGrange points or beyond.

    1. Re:Forget New Space Suits by uberdave · · Score: 1

      Centrifuge. Problem solved.

    2. Re:Forget New Space Suits by Gewis · · Score: 1

      Right, because, uh, we can't work on any other problems at all until we solve that one. Look, that's a serious issue to consider, but to say we should forget about others, like bulky space suits?

      Don't you think it probably makes some sense to work on multiple problems simultaneously if you've got a large number of people to do research? Maybe?

  34. Power Rangers by Ced_Ex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahhh yes... we're one step closer to getting Power Ranger suits. Then we all have to learn to talk and nod our heads at the same time.

    --
    Live forever, or die trying.
  35. Re:Going to Mars? by MagneticMountain · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    We never even went to the moon it was a hoax. Look around there is a lot of evidence.

  36. Re:Mission To Mars by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks to the strong leadership of President Bush, we have a real plan for space, as opposed to mostly circling around Earth currently.

    Unfortunately, because it's been announced by President Bush, many people who oppose his other policies (for good reason) will also tend to oppose his space policy, even if they would support it if it were proposed by somebody else.

  37. The part of the article that caught my eye.. by [cx] · · Score: 0

    "Incorporated into that second skin would be electrically actuated artificial muscle fibers to enhance human strength and stamina."

    When do you think this will be available for the public and how much longer after that will it be banned from all sports?

    [cx]

  38. Seals under pressure? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1
    You'd need to incorporate a system self repair of small holes and tears - perhaps a gluey substance that seals under pressure.
    Doesn't sound like a particularly good solution if you're operating in a vacuum!
    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:Seals under pressure? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Doesn't sound like a particularly good solution if you're operating in a vacuum!

      If a tear occurs the liquid would be drawn out by the vacuum, and then somehow harden. I haven't thought this out in much detail, and you're right there could be problems, but it's an approach that might prove feasible.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Seals under pressure? by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      A rip isn't a problem. since the suits are using mechanical pressure, rather than air pressure, a rip is not threatening (as long as your air supply around your head is safe). You will end up with a horrible bruise from your cappelaries bursting at the point of the rip, but you would survive.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    3. Re:Seals under pressure? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the lack of pressure break the skin and get to the deeper blood vessels?

    4. Re:Seals under pressure? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Apparently not. Elsewhere in this thread, there was talk that the astronaut would be working in a third of an atmosphere with relatively mild effects.

    5. Re:Seals under pressure? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      What about the ears though? I know mine couldn't take 1/3 atmosphere...

      And what I meant was where there was a hole...i mean, there is pressure in the body, at the very least I would have thought that the blood vessels would expand, and possibly break.

    6. Re:Seals under pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The suit still has a helmet, its sprayed on from the neck down.

  39. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Did you read the article the OP linked? Apparently not. And I quote the sub-title:

    President seeks $1 billion more in NASA funding
    Further on:

    Bush proposed spending $12 billion over the next five years on the effort. About $1 billion of that will come from an increase in NASA's budget, while the other $11 billion would come from shifting funds from existing programs within NASA's current $86 billion budget.
  40. Re:Going to Mars? by Rei · · Score: 1

    Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  41. Enhancing Stamina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They claim to integrate artificial muscle fibers to enhance strength and stamina. These suits are allegedly for use on Mars. On Mars? A planet with 0.376 times Earth's gravity? Why bother? If you can stand up on earth on your own legs you should be able to lift yourself and 62.4% of your body mass of additional mass with as little difficulty as you walk on earth today.

    The problem with reduced-gravity environments is losing muscle mass and bone density. If anything a long term martian astronaut will have problems getting an adequate workout on Mars.

  42. Re:Mission To Mars by PocketPick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just pre-election talk. With all the 'crises' our fearless leader keeps talking about, it clear we aren't going anywhere other than perhaps Iran or some other third-world country.

    Strong government investment in space flight won't return unless:

    -Private space flight becomes much larger
    OR
    -China continues to significantly expand its plan for space exploration and manages to put several men on the moon themselves in the coming years.

  43. Yay! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
    Yay! Finally, sexy tight-fitting spacesuits instead of the disgusting bulky hulks of today!

    (More than 30 years ago, Larry Niven proposed such spacesuits in his "Known Space" novels).

  44. Re:Mission To Mars by kitzilla · · Score: 3, Interesting
    > I think the President has done a fantastic job in revitalizing our space program

    Yeah: like cutting Hubble. And racking up record defecits while privately funded firms remind us what the excitement of space exploration used to be all about.

    If Bush really wanted to show some leadership, he'd splash ISS, scrap the Shuttle, and set some realistic short-term goals that his administration would actually have to pay for.

    NASA *is* doing great work with its robotic programs. But most of those programs were green-lighted when President W was still back in Texas making his bones by polluting his state and signing 152 death warrants.

    Feel free to mod me down, Republican bastards. ;-)

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  45. there's no derision there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If I say "space suit" and the first thing this guy thinks is "boner," how is that not gay? Did I say "you're gay, and that sucks"? No, I merely pointed out that if one's immediate reaction to something completely non-boner-related is "boners," that's a good sign that they might be a homosexual.

    Oh, and derogative is not a noun, faggot.

    1. Re:there's no derision there by Tlosk · · Score: 1

      and why would you assume the poster was a male?

    2. Re:there's no derision there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So homophobic and also grammar nazi? At least it's efficient. Space suit... hmm, why can't women use a space suit? A spray-on suit makes me think of the woman that played Mystique in X-Men 2. Is that lesbian or male heterosexual enough for you, idiot?

  46. Agreed there is any number of candidates..... by Guy+G · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see on their way to Mars !

    1. Re:Agreed there is any number of candidates..... by Guy+G · · Score: 1

      George might still be young enough to fit into one of these new fangled space suits......

  47. Re:Mission To Mars by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up.

    I believe the word to describe it is pwned.

  48. Re:Mission To Mars by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    >Just pre-election talk.

    Dude, I don't take recreational drugs but, damn, I want some of what you are smoking.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  49. not a solution for the wrong problem. by Erris · · Score: 1
    A thin layer of biomaterial may be sufficient for protecting you from the vacuum of space if they get around the engineering considerations, but I for one would not want a "second skin" as my only protection from radiation and cosmic rays.

    That's a real problem, but current space ships offer little protection, much less current 250lb+ space suits. No suit is really going to help you, so you need a shelter. Some ideas are lithium shields and crew quarters inside fuel tanks!

    These suits are being designed mostly for places like mars which has a partial pressure. They offer protection against dust, which would foul up current joints.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:not a solution for the wrong problem. by Saeger · · Score: 1
      Some ideas are lithium shields and crew quarters inside fuel tanks!

      And then there's cellular self-repair, which isn't that far off.

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
  50. NASA is anti-Capitalist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its unfair subsidies hurt free market space exploration programs. What ever happened to the Small Government the US was founded on? Adam Smith sheds a tear.

  51. Earth to Space Cadets, Reality for you on line 1 by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Future space explorers may apply a "spray-on" second skin, an organic, biodegradable layer offering protection in extremely dusty planetary environments. Incorporated into the second skin will be electrically actuated artificial muscle fibers to enhance human strength and stamina.

    ooooooKay then. I suppose this has been dreamed up by the same people who envisioned "Nuclear cars", jetpacks, tube-elevators, practically sentient computers, and ray guns?

    Seriously- what qualifies some of these people to talk about the future of space ANYTHING? For 40 years, they've been mostly getting it wrong, and doing not much better than playing the part of scifi authors.

  52. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    come on, this post is flaim bait!

  53. Re:Mission To Mars by Rei · · Score: 5, Funny

    it clear we aren't going anywhere other than perhaps Iran or some other third-world country

    Hmmmm.....

    Iran:
    (image)

    Mars:
    (image)

    I sense a conspiracy in the making...

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  54. Re:Mission To Mars by PocketPick · · Score: 1

    I was refering the promise by Bush for further space exploration funding.

  55. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know why Bush eventually wants to go to Mars?
    He wants to know what it takes to be a man. (women come from venus,....)

    What is he going to do updaire? Wage another war?
    No, he his going to look for fuel.
    Now, where have I seen this before? Ooh yes, in Afganistan and Iraq.

    I don't think god is blessing your country, not as long as presidentscampagnes keeps relying on corporate funds.

    The Anonymous Coward

  56. Years and years and years ago by multiplexo · · Score: 5, Informative
    in that lost and far-away decade of the Jerry Pournelle described in an article in Galaxy that was later reprinted in A Step Farther Out some space suit research that David Clark did in the late 1960s. This was for suits that would provide pressure via a skin tight fit. Unfortunately NASA stopped doing this research and stuck with the suits we have today, which are large, cumbersome, heavy and extremely expensive. Pournelle described how these suits would work in a couple of his novels including Birth of Fire and Exiles to Glory, it's nice to see that NASA is now getting their shit together and restarting this research.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    1. Re:Years and years and years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said the phrase "Jerry Pournelle"!! My head is exploding!!

      (For those of you new to the computer industry, some of us have been bitching and moaning about his "Rob Enderle-like" way of misunderstanding things since before Slashdot existed. Sigh. I had forgotten him and now you've reminded me of him. Damn you! Damn you all to hell!)

  57. Biodegradable? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    In space? Without bacteria or oxygen?

    The only thing I can think of to degarde your suit would be sunlight and I don't think that would be a design feature.

    Fluffy, very fluffy but meaningless.

    1. Re:Biodegradable? by Gewis · · Score: 1

      You know, eventually you DO reenter your habitat. And hopefully there's oxygen in there and, for a long-term habitat, recycling-type processes for biodegradable materials much like you have on earth. Not so fluffy, and far from meaningless. You're not an engineer, are you?

    2. Re:Biodegradable? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      From an engineering perspective, biodegradable suits are a joke.
      Let's assume you consume X space suits for the lifetime of the your habitat. They are so wonderful they only weigh 20[kg] a piece. So now you have to shuttle up W=20X[kg] worth of suit material to your habitat which eventually biodegrades into some goop possibly good as fertilizer.
      X=10, W=200[kg]. Not so bad
      X=100, W=2000[kg]. woa, getting heavy there. You need to lift 2 tons of suit material. Yikes!
      Don't forget shelf life and packaging to keep it intact before use. Don't forget the pressurized, filtered and contained compost heap that ensure it doesn't kill off the crew or generally create insufferable odors.
      Now let's assume you have standard suits, 10 people in your habitat. 100[kg] a suit and you are still shipping up only 1 ton of equipment for something you can you use indefinitely (delta repairs).

      This could possibly make sense only if you were manufacturing the stuff in or around your habitat out of locally available materials. This is a very long way off.

      Like I said, unless you really need all that fertilizer, fluffy.

    3. Re:Biodegradable? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      I forgot one more "engineering" point. In the biodegradable case you will also be lifting up the regular suits for emergencies because the biodegradable one very probably has a limited per use time. So you will be carrying the normal suit load plus 2 tons of fertilizer so that you sound eco-friendly.

  58. Re:Mission To Mars by GoofyBoy · · Score: 1

    burns210 is saying that all he is doing is asking for the money, as your quotes point out ("seeks", "proposed". He/NASA hasn't gotten it yet or done anything written in stone. As far as we know, its something that he plans to sacrifice and then blame it on Congress.

    (He has alot in this budget. To me, it seems like he wants to sell the economic future so he can end up looking better in 4 years.)

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  59. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    152?
    Damn he was slacking!

    Kill the convicts and free up our prisons!

  60. Re:"Suits you well: Includes cup?" by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 1
    From the article: "We need to shrink-wrap the astronaut," Newman said. "It would be like wearing a second skin."

    I hope it includes a cup for sensitive areas. I am uncomfortable with the idea of space rocks impacting my organs.

    On that note, I guess that's why I'm a geek and am not qualified to actually explore space.

    --
    I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
  61. Re:Mission To Mars by ewhac · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks, Mr. Williams. Condi will be by later with your check.

  62. Life imitates art by Rii · · Score: 0

    Notice how the space suit seems to be approaching this?

  63. Re:Mission To Mars by Rei · · Score: 1

    86 billion over the next 5 years. Their budget is an average of around 17 billion per year.

    Oh, and meanwhile, the current cost of the Iraq war, ignoring debt interest, collateral costs (like the cost of society for guardsmen to be called up or the cost to society of having the wounded for the rest of their lives), etc, is 152 billion dollars, and the US just announced we'll be keeping high troop levels for a minimum of two more years (likely many more unless they cut and run). Just showing a budgetary priority comparison here.

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  64. Re:Mission To Mars by damiangerous · · Score: 1

    They received a 6% increase this year.

  65. Who's the target audience of space.com? by darkmeridian · · Score: 1

    I mean, do they tell us that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology is MIT?

    --
    A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
  66. Re:Mission To Mars by Rei · · Score: 1

    Clearly, the parent is a member of the Illuminati conspiracy.

    "You... WILL!!!... Put.. A..Baseball.. Field.. On.. The.. Whitehouse.. Lawn!!!!"

    Everything makes so much more sense now.

    --
    People said I was dumb, but I proved them.
  67. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd mod you down, but I'm only an Anonymous Coward Democrat bastard. ;-)

  68. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we 'scrap the Shuttle', how do we send people up to fix/maintain Hubble?
    A big rubberband?

  69. Re:Going to Mars? by kclittle · · Score: 1

    This is the flag (http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/c/cn.gif/) that will be painted on the side of the next manned mission to the Moon:

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  70. Makes perfect sence. by Quantum+Jim · · Score: 1
    --
    It is impossible to enjoy idling thoroughly unless one has plenty of work to do.
    - Jerome Klapka Jerome
  71. Re:Going to Mars? by kclittle · · Score: 1

    sorry -- here's the right link (cut and paste it...) http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/c/cn.gif

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
  72. Re:Earth to Space Cadets, Reality for you on line by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, and those people who dreamed up a computer smaller than ten feet by ten and weighing less than two tonnes. What were they thinking?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  73. Re:Mission To Mars by burns210 · · Score: 1

    True. He is 'seeking' but has not gotten yet. I do give Bush some credit for that, but it hasn't gotten to the engineers yet.

    And your second quote, Bush is proposing cutting 11 billion dollars from NASA's other projects... NASA is doing many cool things on many fronts. Cutting costs in other departments or projects is harmful. It needs to be a $12 billion increase in the budget, for several consecutive years, not a $1 billion dollar increase(they get something like 15-20 billion annualy as-is) and pulling 1/2 theird budget from other projects to meet Bush's goal.

    What was the phrase: "Faster, Strong, Cheaper: Pick any TWO that you want."

    NASA needs all 3, and it needs the resources (money+time) to get there. It needs the funding to build and design a more modular and reliable/reusable space craft. It needs funding for new space suits, satelites, probes, robotics, infrastructure upgrades, IT upgrades, planning/testing phases, etc.

  74. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    his decisive leadership and strong character.

    To completely understand the mind behind the above sentence, repeat it to yourself in a Colonel Klink accent.

  75. Re:Mission To Mars by Rakishi · · Score: 1

    We weren't going to use the Shuttle in the first place.

  76. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are the master of contradiction, bravo! You would love him not to scrap the hubble. Then you could complain more about defecits. So deficits are bad except for your pet project? I could just hear how happy people would be if he scrapped ISS and the shuttle. In deed, the guy just can't win. Well, all except for elections. HAHA

  77. Re:Mission To Mars by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What Bush has done is decimate the scientific programs of NASA and had the agency over to the aerospace lobby. But with comments like...

    "mostly circling around Earth"

    you have made your impression of science apparent

    Did you know that the "science of the outer planets" scientific research line for 2005
    Was just cut? Yup, wiped off the board. This was a small program, only a few million, and it funded some very interesting work... Well, it's gone now, I guess that makes you feel very patriotic...

    "God Bless America"... indeed

    --
    "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
  78. Re:Going to Mars? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

    You're joking right... please tell me you're joking. I mean any semi-intelligent person could easily find the dozens of sites rebutting that "evidence" ... so you must be joking, right?

  79. KISS by argoff · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure if I agree with their approach. I would think that loose fitting, light, super high strength baggy outfits would be the best way to go. They could be weaved in with netted fibre, like a hot air baloon. As long as they have enough pressure to maintain proper-psi on the skin, it doesn't matter if they're a little loose. or if they puff out a little. Shoes could be regular tennies worn on the outside of the suit, maybe something similar with leather gloves. Humidity, temperature, and varying air pressure would half to be managed (maybe a high humidity zone for breathing, and a low humidity zone for sweating). A portable (roll along?) unit hooked up to a long tube would be eaiser to work with. If a problem happens, the could just disconnect the tube, walk back to the unit, and plug in there, take a spare along too. For radiation, there could be carry along umbrellas, or shelters. Maybe light protection in the suit, but not to weigh it down.

    IMHO, The idea of laser custom fit suits, and spraid on super-skin just seems like problems waiting to happen. It's better to keep it simple to use, simple to change, repair, simple to manage, and inherently uncomplicated.

    1. Re:KISS by cjameshuff · · Score: 1

      They don't just "puff out a little", they puff out with a high internal pressure, making it very difficult to bend your limbs...hence the complicated joints. An elastic, form-fitting suit could be both far simpler mechanically and far less restrictive. Spray-on coatings sound far easier to deal with than rotating, vacuum-tight seals.

    2. Re:KISS by Gewis · · Score: 1

      The problem is that baggy outfits in vacuum environments quickly become very rigid. And when you try to move, you're constantly fighting against the internal pressure which is trying to force your suit to assume a particular shape. Add to that all sorts of problems with non-constant volume designs we currently have, and things become really weird. I've worked with vacuum glove boxes, and it's incredibly obnoxious when I have to pull my left hand back to reach my right hand forward, in order to keep the volume about nearly constant without having to continuously be adding or sucking gas from the chamber.

      Make the whole thing skin tight to begin with, and you're finally grasping the true meaning of KISS.

    3. Re:KISS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they have enough pressure to maintain proper-psi on the skin, it doesn't matter if they're a little loose. or if they puff out a little.

      An ordinary party balloon has a pressure difference of around 1/10 Atmosphere between the inside and outside. A suit designed to be inflated to 10 times that differential would have be very sturdy and would have to have very carefully designed joints to allow you to move at all.

    4. Re:KISS by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 1

      Come on, that doesn't sound *nearly* expensive enough.

      --

      lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  80. Re:Going to Mars? by Rakishi · · Score: 1

    Doubt it, cost is too high with few benefits unless they go for a moon base. And by benefits I don't just mean scientific and economic but also political/social. I doubt China wants to mimic the US space program since that doesn't boost morale, however expanding on it would. However, a moon base is a very costly endeavor and China may simply not be willing to spend that much for the potentially limited gains.

  81. Good luck with the mars things guys by nickgrieve · · Score: 1

    I pity the first crew on a mars mission... radiation sickness is a horrible way to die... in a tin coffin millions of miles away from home with nothing but the coldness of space arounb you no less...

    1. Re:Good luck with the mars things guys by izakage · · Score: 0

      ...This is Major Tom to ground control...

  82. Aw man... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    What a disappointment. I thought it would be something like this.

  83. In related news ... by eck011219 · · Score: 1

    NASA announced today its plan to recruit exclusively from the U.S. bobsled and luge teams.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  84. More Photos by Uplore · · Score: 1

    Here are some more photos of the suit, including sketches, of what the suits look like in cool poses.

    http://www.batkhela.com/msn/power-rangers-display- pictures.shtml

    --
    I couldn't think of a sig.
    1. Re:More Photos by Uplore · · Score: 3, Funny
      --
      I couldn't think of a sig.
  85. Re:Going to Mars? by orangesquid · · Score: 1

    Hahaha. Yeah I know... 'we all know conspiracies are dumb' (-b182).

    Seriously, I'm waiting for my Spa[ce]ndex suit.

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  86. Yea, right by real+gumby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    C'mon guys, this isn't news. It isn't even a press release purporting to be news. It's just a gee-whizz-somebody-is-doing-research-on-an-idea news. It's so far away from being news that when it finally is, years or even decades from now, you won't be able to recogize the connection.

    Let's leave this stuff unread in in Popular Science or Technology Review where it belongs.

    1. Re:Yea, right by Gewis · · Score: 1

      You do know that this is the science section of slashdot, right? And that research-into-new-stuff constitutes news that belongs on a research-oriented news site? Why does it have to be a press release in order to be news?

      If you've got a problem with research being talked about on science.slashdot.org, then perhaps you should just go somewhere else.

    2. Re:Yea, right by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      I understand your point. Where I don't think it applies to this article is that I don't consider the article "News" (much less news for nerds).

      There are a gajillion cool research projects under way. The (someday) coolest ones probably look lame right now to the rest of us not specifically working on them. 99.99% of all research will never amount to anything, and when the few of them that will produce something ultimately get there, it'll be very close to the end, or even after the end, of the research project. That's part of why we call them "research" and why stories about them are almost never news.

      Occasionally a story about some early-stage research project could be newsworthy, or at least fun and ./-worthy. But this article is no more informative than a potato chip is nutritious. That's my complaint.

      (Press releases aren't news either, but from time to time a wave of them makes it through the ./ process. Big deal -- it happens. But in this submission's case I claim that this "article" is even less than a lowly press release).

      Hope this is clear,
      d

  87. Good old NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another intelligent and needed item for space exploration.

    It will be cut in two years.

  88. HALO SUITS by twoes00 · · Score: 1

    Are hot... These just suck...

  89. Advertise Mars by MaGGuN · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think we should start advertising on going to mars. Ads everywhere, "Mars is great", "Lets explore Mars" etc. etc. Maybe Slashdot can have a vote and put up an ad if the audience says yay.

  90. Re:Going to Mars? by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

    Has anybody in power in any of the space-faring nations read "The Moon is a Harsh Mistress"? Limited gains, no: limited imaginations, unfortunately, yes. sigh.

    --
    Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  91. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mission to Mars, eh? Let's see... extravagant plan... inadequate funding... all talk and no action... minor footnote to primary plan of international conquest in the name of freedom...

    Oh! Let's call it the No Planet Left Behind plan!

  92. From the article by Zebra_X · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Incorporated into that second skin would be electrically actuated artificial muscle fibers to enhance human strength and stamina.

    Right - this technology is WAY far away. Synthetic muscle fibers have been under development for the last decade. One of the first innovations were Contractle Polymers. These have since given way to other technologies - but non yet equal the strength of human muscle. In addition to make them more useful, these fibers are going to have to be multiples of the strength of human muscle. Also, the notion of a "spray on" skin that creates a powered exomuscular infrastructure requires a fusing of so many current and future technologies that this is not a particularly realistic goal at this time.

    I think what i'm trying to say - this isn't news it's a dream. Obviously people need to figure it out - but there are not going to be tangible results from such research for sometime.

  93. because this is slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it has the female-repellant capacity of a dozen Radio Shacks.

  94. Ask Joe Kittinger... by delcielo · · Score: 1

    I met Mr. Kittinger in October this last year.

    He's the man who jumped from a weather balloon at 102,000 feet wearing a space suit. On the ascent he had a problem with one of the gloves on his pressure suit. He elected not to tell anybody believing that the silk glove he wore underneath as a liner would keep his hand from rupturing. It did in fact keep his hand from rupturing, though it swelled to 3 times its normal size and was useless until the swelling went down.

    The point I'm making is that it if the spray-on suit is flexible enough to allow you to bend your elbow, thereby stretching the material on the outside of the bend, could it be strong enough to not only contain the pressure of your body; but contain it with enough pressure to maintain its shape? With all of the potential twists and movements of a normal human body, how would it know what stretching to allow, and which to contain?

    --
    Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  95. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Thanks to the strong leadership of President Bush, we have a real plan for space,..."

    There is some evidence that Bush's space initiative is totally unrealistic. Besides, which each shuttle flight at an estimated cost of 760 million, the billion dollars that he requested from congress in your article is not going to get you anywhere near the Moon, let alone Mars... No worries though, the long timeframes of space missions ensure that Bush will have left politics way before there is any backlash from the failure of his space program.

  96. Stillsuits by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1
    "The ultimate goal of this concept is a symbiotic interaction of astronaut and spacesuit like that between humans and terrestrial plants in which the astronaut's waste carbon dioxide and water vapor are converted back into respirable oxygen in the suit walls using environmental energy sources."

    Don't the Fremen use stillsuits that are just like this?

    1. Re:Stillsuits by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Not quite. The fremen stillsuit recycles liquid output into potable water, whereas this is talking about recycling water and CO2 into O2.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    2. Re:Stillsuits by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

      Or John Varley's symbiotic dwellers of tht Oort cloud.

  97. give it to the sex and porn industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spray-on suits will be something the sex toy and porn industry will be best able to take and refine to make better and more cost-effective...

    1. Re:give it to the sex and porn industry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no need to take viagra, just take it out and spray it...

      ---wife just pointed out that if you can spray on polymers that act as muscles then a woman could simply spray this stuff in the appropriate places and do without a man or partner...

  98. My favorite space apparel... by Biomechanical · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is the peacekeeper spacesuits from Farscape.

    They're black - instantly cool but probably a problem to spot your mate when his dark face shield is closed - the helmet is just barely bigger than your head - so you don't go knocking your noggin on stuff cause you forgot - and all the fastenings had that appearance of being sturdy and functional without taking ages to fiddle with.

    They weren't skin tight, more like about how baggy a tracksuit is on a regular sized person, but they weren't overly bulky either. The costume designers even made sure to put small "life support" systems on the backs of the suits too, and although they only looked big enough to scrub CO2 for maybe 30-45 minutes, I imagine something slightly bigger could be made, or have hook-up points on the suit and ship for extended EVA.

    It would have been good to find an interview with Claudia Black or Ben Browder that asked if the general design of the mock-up suits was comfortable.

    Skin tight is functional, but I can see personal aesthetics screwing with the crew - we're only human, and things that shouldn't bother us generally do.

    --
    His name is Robert Paulsen...
    1. Re:My favorite space apparel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if eroticism was a problem (i don't think it will be really any more than seeing pwoplw in swimwear or wetsuits is) then they could always wear something else over the presure suit

      in fact it wouldn't surprise me if they would for other reasons like protecting the skintight layer anyway

      essentially in a vacum the suit has to provide presure so far we have used gas presure but that has big problems regarding restricted movement and leaks mechanical preasure may be a more sensible option.

  99. Re:Mission To Mars by ApostateApostle · · Score: 1

    > Yeah: like cutting Hubble.

    If I'm not mistaken, isn't the reason they're scrapping the Hubble because it'd be more expensive to repair it than to let it deorbit and send up a new telescope? Besides, didn't it preform above and beyond it's original mission profile?

    I say let it go down in dignity and get some new tech up there, instead of letting it languish over the next decade with continual jury-rigged refits.

  100. Bends? by waif69 · · Score: 1

    After travelling recently to 16000 feet with out any pressurization, I would think in my uneducated experience that a space-traveller could get the bends with these new suits. Could someone please explain? I don't have any background that explains this. Do the space-travellers depressurize while in the ship/space-station?

    1. Re:Bends? by thogard · · Score: 1

      You tend to only get the bends when you exceed two atm difference in pressure but there are cases at shallower depths but common dive tables only start about 1.3 atm (40 ft down). Modern space craft are slightly lower than 1 atm and Apollo was like a 1/3 atm but with pure o2. People also have a wide variations of what causes them problems and what doesn't and that is something they will find out early on in astronaut training. 16,000 ft is about 60->70% of a normal atm.

    2. Re:Bends? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      More to the point, you only get decompression sickness when you experience a large, rapid depressurisation. Nitrogen cant dissipate fast enough and you get bubbles in your tissue.
      For SCUBA purposes, this is pretty unlikely if you're less than 2atm (10m depth).

      If you're going from 1atm in the habitat/station to 1 atm in the suit, I wouldnt think the change is severe enough.

  101. You must be a PR from the white house by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • The ISS is now a disaster since we did not finish our parts.
    • GWB stopped the X-33 from being finished and prevented L-M from finishing the rest on their own (frame was finished, the engines were tested, and the tanks were finished about 1 year ago). We would be in space right now, except for GWB.
    • We are now grounded and not flying anybody into even LEO space, but just about everybody else is.
    • He just canceled the hubble repair. I really do not care one one or another about it (we can actually build better ones at either pole), but doing a space repair via robotics is what is needed. Yet he is not even willing to allow another space agency to take over the hubble.
    In good shape???? You have to be kidding. That statement is about as good as GWB now saying that we were invited into Iraq (shades of Communist china and USSR). To really make matters worse, even most people in GWB's staff knows that what is said is full of shit.
  102. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    No, he his going to look for fuel.

    Quit honestly, it would have better had we gone to Mars. It would have cost a fraction of what Iraq has cost. We have already spent about 155B (that is billion, not million) on Iraq and he is asking for 80B more (just for this year). It would have been better for America (but not likely to find oil there, so we do not go).

  103. Ventilated Space Suit by bluyonder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Human skin is actually a surprisingly strong pressure barrier. The conterpressure suit can be an open weave with up to millimeter sized openings. The biggest problem is figuring out how to keep pressure on the concave areas such as under the arms and behind the knees. An advantage of counterpressure suits is that a tear in the suit doesn't result in catastrophic pressure loss. It only causes injury to the area of the tear. Another problem with them is getting them on and off. It would be like putting super tight pantyhose over your whole body. (not that I know anything about that)

    Here are some papers on counterpressure suits:
    http://mvl.mit.edu/EVA/BioSuitDJN_Nov03.pdf
    http://spacecraft.ssl.umd.edu/publications/ICES02- 2311.pdf
    http://mvl.mit.edu/EVA/NIACPhaseIReport.pdf

    1. Re:Ventilated Space Suit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Another problem with them is getting them on and off. It would be like putting super tight pantyhose over your whole body. (not that I know anything about that)

      You should try putting some on. They're really very comfortable.

  104. in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no one can hear you scream

  105. Re:Earth to Space Cadets, Reality for you on line by Gewis · · Score: 1

    ooooooKay then. I suppose you'd prefer that everybody in research positions stop using their imaginations and coming up with new ideas?

    Seriously- what qualifies this person to question some MIT professors' qualifications to talk about the future of space ANYTHING?

    Look, they're doing real research, and if you RTFA (the rest of it), you'd know they're planning on prototyping and making it. Is it guaranteed that they'll use this stuff? No. But none of these people who envisioned nuclear cars, jetpacks, tube elevators, practically sentient computers, and ray guns were promising anything. Except, well, we've got ray guns, practically sentient computers are still possible (the time-frame was just wrong), and cars or planes with quantum nucleonic reactors are feasible.

  106. Your blood would not boil & other interesting by IceFoot · · Score: 1

    Hmmmm... turns out, there actually is data on animals (intentionally) and humans (accidentally) exposed to a vacuum.

    • You'd lose consciousness after about ten seconds
    • Your blood would NOT boil.
    • Your body would swell up to about twice its normal volume, but this could be constrained by an elastic body suit.
    • You'd want to open your mouth: If you tried to hold your breath, your lungs would balloon up and rupture.
    Then there's the interesting case of a balloon ascent to 20 mi (32 km, near vacuum) in which the pilot lost pressurization only in his right glove. His hand swelled and became stiff and painful, but three hours after landing, his hand was back to normal, with no ill effects.

    Details of all this here

  107. 7 inch tall by Novelty+Act · · Score: 1

    and 98ft long :)

    1. Re:7 inch tall by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Well, that is one way! But no, this folded into a little box about 10 ft across (the width of the solar array) and 7 inches high, and maybe 7 inches deep. The pole that the array extended on also collapsed into a little cube about a foot on a side. Very neat and tidy. :-) I see your point though, that wouldn't make for much of a "portable array" now would it!

  108. But by GnarlyNome · · Score: 1

    it's like a cheap hotel....no ballroom

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until you can find a rock. Will Rogers
  109. hmm... by Bolshoy+Pimpovich · · Score: 0

    I wonder if I could get one of those to use when I go biking or surfing...

    --
    Ehta nyeh IBM, ehta Macintosh!
  110. Perfect target for Centennial Challenges prizes by FleaPlus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Things like this are the perfect target for the Centennial Challenges program, a NASA program of prize contests for private endeavours to create or accomplish things related to space exploration. Spacesuit design is an area where a small private company can make appreciable progress with a reasonable amount of investment.

    An even more specific goal is a better astronaut glove. Gloves sound like very simple things, but it's been pretty tricky so far to create a glove which can reliably remain intact in a vacuum while also giving the user a good degree of manual dexterity. A space policy analyst said the following in an article:

    In fact, the glove is the biggest problem in designing the high-pressure space suits necessary to avoid the bends (the same problem a diver has when she surfaces too quickly) when an astronaut goes out into the vacuum of space. Larger joints like shoulders and knees have special designs that are zero-volume change, but no one has yet miniaturized such a design to finger joints.

    Because this is a critical technology, and one that has great leverage in influencing launch system trades, I would propose the following:

    Build a vacuum glove box with a task box inside (perhaps an automobile engine that has to be dissassembled and reassembled). Put up a purse of a million dollars to the first person who can achieve the task working through gloves under a pressure differential of half an atmosphere, without a break.

    Unlike many space activities, it's a project that can be literally done in someone's garage, and it may spur a great amount of innovation for very low cost. Accordingly, it would make an excellent candidate for the Office of Exploration's new prize fund, and I hope they'll strongly consider it. At very low cost to the taxpayers, one or more successful concepts could lay to rest myths about the intrinsic difficulty of working in space, opening up the options for how we will get to the planets beyond redoing Apollo, perhaps saving billions in dollars, and constituting a major step toward becoming a truly spacefaring nation.

  111. It's about time... by TheWormThatFlies · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The spray-on thing may be new, but the idea of a mechanical counter pressure suit isn't.

    Jerry Pournelle mentioned a project like this in A Step Farther Out, a collection of science articles related to space travel and other science fiction ideas written in the seventies. He claims that tests of the suit design in actual vacuum conditions were going very well, and then the project got canned for no apparent reason.

    I'm glad that it's back in development - I don't think we'd get very far in space relying on clunky armoured suits.

    On a side note, it's very amusing how many people have bizarre misconceptions of the effects of vacuum on the human body, thanks to godawful movie "science".

    1. Re:It's about time... by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

      Marshall Savage also proposed this in his book "The Millennial Project: How to Colonize the Galaxy in Eight Easy Steps" Linky

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
  112. Re:Mission To Mars by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    I hate President Bush as much as the next reasonable person, but was this post modded as a Troll just because it acknowledged the fact that Bush proposed a new space plan?

  113. Re:Mission To Mars by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    And he increased NASA funding, while most everything else got funding cuts. Was there something else you were expecting?

    In any case, I'm of the opinion that cutting the Space Shuttle and ISS from the budget will free up more than enough to get us on the road towards permanent, largely self-sustaining lunar habitats.

  114. Re:Your blood would not boil & other interesti by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Then there's the interesting case of a balloon ascent to 20 mi (32 km, near vacuum) in which the pilot lost pressurization only in his right glove. His hand swelled and became stiff and painful, but three hours after landing, his hand was back to normal, with no ill effects.

    You'd really want to make sure your fly was done up!

  115. Queer Eye for the Space man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like in the old days of bbs.isca.uiowa.edu:
    Nuff said

  116. mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is the obsession with this lifeless
    desolate planet.
    To me titan seems to hold more information.
    Yea ok it might have held life at one time.
    It does not now, and sending a human there is going
    to accomplish?

  117. Re:Mission To Mars by eraserewind · · Score: 1
    Thanks to the strong leadership of President Bush, we have a real plan for space, as opposed to mostly circling around Earth currently.
    Unfortunately, because it's been announced by President Bush, many people who oppose his other policies (for good reason) will also tend to oppose his space policy, even if they would support it if it were proposed by somebody else.
    Luckily, thanks to lack of funding by President Bush, all disagreements will become academic anyway.
  118. Re:Mission To Mars by hairykrishna · · Score: 1
    No.

    The problem is with the policy. Not enough money has been made available to NASA to actually do much.

    --
    "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
  119. Another Science Fiction reference... by dpilot · · Score: 1

    "Moving Mars" by Greg Bear

    They had spray-on emergency space suits, used during a student protest on a future Mars. The scene had some elements of /. mentality in it.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  120. Thoughts of "Red Mars" by Mr.+Ghost · · Score: 0
    This suit seems to trigger a reminder in my head of the type worn by the explorers in Kim Stanley Robinson's Red Mars nover from the early 90's.

    I find it interesting how it seems that so many ideas in science today are first appeared in science fiction novels from the past. I wonder if this is because the authors of these novels forsee problems that will occur in the future that must be solved or are these new creations a result of the creators being inspired by the novels they read in the past.

  121. We don't need them by kbw · · Score: 1

    The whole Mars landing can be simulated at Area 51 just like the Apollo landings. They could use Tuxedos instead.

  122. We don't need no stinken space suits! by bradbury · · Score: 1
    At least not for Mars at any rate. Because we can easily send up a few nanorobots to disassemble the planet. If the private space effort continues the way it is going then it is far more likely that Mars will be gone by the time any government effort gets people there to explore.

    Oh yes, and before you cast me as a troll, as someone did last week, read the friggen papers.

  123. I love my spacesuit but... by vudufixit · · Score: 1

    What's that hissing sound???

    1. Re:I love my spacesuit but... by witte · · Score: 1

      Too much burritos ?

  124. Agressive and wrong by vortex2.71 · · Score: 1

    First, why is everyone so damn aggresive in their rhetoric on this issue. Chill out and explain your ideas rather than lashing out.

    "You're a Hollywood-trained idiot. Your blood will not boil. Your body will not explode. There will be outgassing, but not so much as you think, and that's not the same thing as *boiling*, anyway"

    This is not correct. If you went into the vacuum of space you would start to blead out of your nose (vessels very close to the skin surface) first then your eardrumms would pop and you would blead out of your ears. Meanwhile your skin would be hemoraging all over your body, you would swell up like a balloon (ever been on a long airplain ride and taken off your shoes?) and you would pass out from lack of blood supply to your brain. The blood streaming out of your nose and ears would most certainly "boil" as there is no pressure to keep it in liquid form. PV=nRT. With the pressure going to zero the volume must increase, creating a very large diffuse quantity e.g. a gas. Call it outgasing or boiling, but liquid blood will leak out of your body and becomes a gas.

    1. Re:Agressive and wrong by Phanatic1a · · Score: 1
      You are wrong.

      Your blood is at a higher pressure than the outside environment. A typical blood pressure might be 75/120. The "75" part of this means that between heartbeats, the blood is at a pressure of 75 Torr (equal to about 100 mbar) above the external pressure. If the external pressure drops to zero, at a blood pressure of 75 Torr the boiling point of water is 46 degrees Celsius (115 F). This is well above body temperature of 37 C (98.6 F). Blood won't boil, because the elastic pressure of the blood vessels keeps it it a pressure high enough that the body temperature is below the boiling point-- at least, until the heart stops beating (at which point you have other things to worry about!). (To be more pedantic, blood pressure varies depending on where in the body it is measured, so the above statement should be understood as a generalization. However, the effect of small pockets of localized vapor is to increase the pressure. In places where the blood pressure is lowest, the vapor pressure will rise until equilibrium is reached. The net result is the same.)


      Yes, blood that leaves your body will begin to boil. That's not what we were talking about, which was blood *inside* your body.
  125. new idea for vac suits by VAXcat · · Score: 1

    Yahh skin tight vac suits that rely on mechanical pressure to augment your skins pressure holding ability - new and exciting technology. I remember how exciting it was to read about...in 1968, when it was first discussed.

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    1. Re:new idea for vac suits by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      For you, shouldnt that be VAXsuits?

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
  126. Re:Mission To Mars by j_cavera · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, we in the aerospace industry no longer believe a president when they outline such a plan -- as nearly every president has done since Nixon. But (with apologies to Tom Wolfe), no bucks, no Buck Rogers.

    - Jim

    --
    #include "humorous_pop_culture_reference.h"
  127. Still matter by wombatmobile · · Score: 1

    Even without gravity you're mass still matters.

    Spelling and grammar also still matter.

  128. Overlord by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1
    They're black - instantly cool but probably a problem to spot your mate when his dark face shield is closed
    Dude. Rule one!
  129. MCP suit, softsuit, hardsuit, spacesuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An interesting article, but the principle is hardly new. Paul Webb first proposed the MCP suit in the late 1960's. The Wiki entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_activity_suit has links to the original 1968 and 1971 reports and is worth reading.

    The suits are interesting but not perfect. You apparently have to prebreathe and use low air pressure (in the helmet). Then there's the twin items of protecting the crotch and providing sanitary 'facilities' for astronauts stepping out for more than an hour or two.

    Other items that some people have commented on could actually be fixed quite easily. Radiation protection and micrometeorite armor could be provided by a coverall worn over or strapped to the inner pressure suit (imperial storm trooper armor?). Because the coverall doesn't have to be airtight its tolerances (and costs) can be a lot lower. tactically placed holes in the coverall would allow tubes from the PLSS through. The hard torso would, if used at all, only be used to carry the PLSS since the suit appears to do all the pressure support.

    Space.com and the base article appear to have left out the most important link of all of this. http://mvl.mit.edu/EVA/biosuit.html has more pics and more technical data.

    I doubt that suits like this would initially be used for any kind of space tourism. For that the ability to adjust and resize a suit, as can be done with the current EMU suits or with a fully rigid hardsuit design, is probably more important. A modular suit, especially a hardsuit, would bring the price down a lot. A commercial operator might also like a hardsuit's zero-prebreathe capability.

    A non-spacegoing but interested Coward.

  130. Re:Mission To Mars by Lovesquid · · Score: 0

    Time to visit the Domestic Advisor and slide the Science slider to the right and the Luxuries slider to the left, I think.

  131. Re:Mission To Mars by lintocs · · Score: 1

    Why, does mars have vast oil reserves?

    S

  132. The Space Activity Suit, Reinvented... by stonewolf · · Score: 1

    Thank the powers that be that they are *FINALLY* going back to trying to design a reasonable space suit. For those of you have have never heard of the 1968 (to long...) experiments in designing a flexible reasonable suit should look here:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_activity_suit

    Some info on the relationship between the old and the new is given here:

    http://chapters.marssociety.org/winnipeg/sas.htm l

    The basic concept seems to go back to the '50s and maybe even the 40s.

    At least they are looking at it again.

    On a slightly different topic: The pictures are very interesting. But, there is a problem in that *all* the holes in the human body have to be covered. So, the pictures showing a helmet over the head and a nice smooth body everywhere else are a bit misleading. At the very least you need a "helmet" that cover the anus and urogenital region. So, you wind up with a hard helmet around the head and a hard diaper around the pelvis. At the very least you wind up with a kind of back to front cod piece.

    Seriously, the pictures from NASA allways portray the astronauts as being built like Barbie and Ken.

    Stonewolf

  133. your more right than you really want to know. by type40 · · Score: 1

    The space suits being gay comment could be taken as bad taste, but it's not that far off the mark.
    Surf over to http://www.gearfetish.com/ and you will see that space suits can in fact be very gay in a "Who's your daddy asstronaut boy." kind of way.

    Me personally, I'll stick to my flight gear. I prefer my kink to have at least alittle atmosphere.

    --
    "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
  134. Re:Mission To Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Martian, I want to welcome our new American overlords

  135. Re:Mission To Mars by sean5008 · · Score: 1

    Condi Rice says that the Martians have weapons of mass destruction. PLUS they are not even Christians! Bush wants to go there to bring peace, democracy and free elections to Mars. The Martians will be totally shocked and awed by our suborbital nuclear bombardment!

  136. Re:Mission To Mars by slasar · · Score: 1

    Funny! Only I think if it was emperor Bush it would be more konamnd

  137. Re:Mission To Mars by slasar · · Score: 1

    Mars is too far for this administration, Bush only wants military on the moon.