Slashdot Mirror


2.4GHz Wi-Fi Detector Ring Project

mohrt writes "The Wi-Fi detection ring was developed to give mobile computer users the ability to detect 802.11b/g signals, while providing a unique, fashionable and ultra-portable product package. The prototype circuit collects and rectifies an RF signal in the 2.4GHz range, whereafter an Atmel Tiny microprocessor, detecting the presence of a DC voltage, thusly engages a flashing LED. For those of you who have no excuse to wear a ring, well here it is."

248 comments

  1. The One Ring! by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
    That is just SO damn cool! It is clearly the One Ring and easily shows the bearer as ubergeek.

    The last time a ring was this cool was with a decoder and a whistle and came in a cereal box.

    i see you, too, have the schwartz

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The One Ring! by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why don't they invent one even more useful to:
      • Detect when women are horny
      • Detect when a woman has had enough to drink and will sleep with almost anyone
      • Detect when a woman has just broken up with a boy friend, and wants to 'show him' by sleeping with another man..
      • Warn you when YOU are drunk and hitting on the boss's wife at a party
      • One that shows she's gonna sleep with you, and not just leeching drinks off you at the bar
      Just a few suggestions...
      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    2. Re:The One Ring! by Zutfen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I gotta say, the practical usefulness of this is lacking, at best.

      I mean, I guess it's a neat little project, but are people gonna buy( or bother to make one of their own)? The only people I can see this being useful for would likely already own a PDA with 802.11....

      Wouldn't it make more sense to make it into a pen shape or something, so it could have a better antenna and a sensitive tunnel diode? Plus, it'd look a lot less stupid than even the 3D concept pictures, let alone the prototype if you could just have it in your pocket. (Pocket protector optional.)

      --
      I'm too lazy to enter a sig. Hey wait a second! You tricked me!
    3. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, get out much?

    4. Re:The One Ring! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
      > Why don't they invent one even more useful to: * Detect when women are horny * Detect when a woman has had enough to drink and will sleep with almost anyone * Detect when a woman has just broken up with a boy friend, and wants to 'show him' by sleeping with another man.. * Warn you when YOU are drunk and hitting on the boss's wife at a party

      Because of convergence.

      You see, if you buy the WiFi detector ring that shows you when you have ready access to pr0n, you have one device that eliminates the need for all four of these separate devices.

      > * One that shows she's gonna sleep with you, and not just leeching drinks off you at the bar

      Speaking of convergence, I built one of those last week. All it took was about 3 inches of wire, a 3V battery, a current-limiting resistor, and an LED.

    5. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tri Ringoj por la elfoj sub la hela cxiel'
      Sep por la gnomoj en salonoj el sxton'.
      Naux por la homoj sub la morto-sigel',
      Unu por la Nigra Regxo sur la nigra tron'
      Kie kusxas Ombroj en Mordora Land'.
      Unu Ringo ilin regas, Unu ilin prenas,
      Unu Ringo en mallumon ilin gvidas kaj katenas
      Kie kusxas Ombroj en Mordora Land.'

    6. Re:The One Ring! by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Just the thing to rul3 them all... just the thing to f1nd them...

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    7. Re:The One Ring! by xargs · · Score: 5, Funny

      And using the One Ring Lord Sauron ventured into the hotel lobby in search of a hot spot. There shall be no WiFi outside his reach.

    8. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about something simple as telling you how close you are to having beer goggles on.

      I SWEAR she was unbelieveably beautiful last night after 18-22 beers.

    9. Re:The One Ring! by museumpeace · · Score: 1

      You never heard of Mood Rings?

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    10. Re:The One Ring! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 3, Funny

      Speaking of convergence, I built one of those last week. All it took was about 3 inches of wire, a 3V battery, a current-limiting resistor, and an LED.

      Please excuse my ignorance. But would that just be a lit LED, thus indicating that the subject is always just leeching drinks with no intention of sleeping with the bearer of said device?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    11. Re:The One Ring! by Phil246 · · Score: 1

      in order to make such a ring, developers require the conclusive guide to women ( aka a manual ) , and unfortunately there isnt a reliable one out there yet :)

    12. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      this clearly runs rings around those keychain detectors...

      sorry :(

    13. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW youre a sharp one eh?

    14. Re:The One Ring! by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      from TFA: ...the prototype unit does not discriminate between other sources of 2.4GHz RF, eg. "leaky" microwave ovens,...
      So it will keep me from cooking my cohones along with my microwave popcorn...that sounds useful to me. If the Atmel could be programmed to drive a little active antenna tuning, maybe it would also double as a bug sweeper?
      Disclosure: I do wear a pocket protector.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    15. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When would anyone who reads /. have a chance to use these features? :)

    16. Re:The One Ring! by Zutfen · · Score: 1

      I suppose I hadn't thought of using it as a device for protecting one's nuts from a leaky microwave.

      Silly me, I thought it was a WiFi detector, even after reading TFA. Just not thinking about my nuts enough, apparently, thank God I read slashdot!

      My nuts thank you too!

      --
      I'm too lazy to enter a sig. Hey wait a second! You tricked me!
    17. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      in order to make such a ring, developers require the conclusive guide to women ( aka a manual ) , and unfortunately there isnt a reliable one out there yet :)


      a reliable guide or a reliable woman?

    18. Re:The One Ring! by FSWKU · · Score: 1
      Why don't they invent one even more useful to:
      * Detect when women are horny
      * Detect when a woman has had enough to drink and will sleep with almost anyone
      * Detect when a woman has just broken up with a boy friend, and wants to 'show him' by sleeping with another man..
      * Warn you when YOU are drunk and hitting on the boss's wife at a party
      * One that shows she's gonna sleep with you, and not just leeching drinks off you at the bar
      The problem with that comes in that they would need to add a small, high resolution CCD, and some advanced AI. Otherwise, instead of picking up the attractive women that meet any of the above criteria, you run the risk of it picking up some chain-smoking bargoyle. Not a good thing...
      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    19. Re:The One Ring! by The+Tyro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Too funny... though I think you're aiming too low. Desperation is rarely attractive to a woman, and trolling for drunks and barflies is likely to be unfulfilling.

      I'd suggest holding out for some quality women instead of going for the low-hanging fruit... the fruit can be sweet, but the aftertaste can be permanent. Despite the commercials you see on TV, herpes still isn't curable, and taking valtrex every day for suppressive therapy is a drag, and expensive (not to mention what happens when your next hot date goes snooping in your medicine cabinet)

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    20. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My problem...by the time she's leeched enough drinks off of me to be drunk enough to sleep with me, sleep is about all she's capable of anymore.

    21. Re:The One Ring! by proverbialcow · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why don't they invent one even more useful to: ... Detect when a woman has had enough to drink and will sleep with almost anyone

      Liability, probably. Sex with someone who is not able to give consent is rape. Legally (though IANAL), a woman who's had enough to drink so she'll sleep with anyone is not sober enough to give consent.

      --
      The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    22. Re:The One Ring! by stinkyfingers · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Women go near you?

    23. Re:The One Ring! by ilikecaffeine · · Score: 5, Funny
      Please excuse my ignorance. But would that just be a lit LED, thus indicating that the subject is always just leeching drinks with no intention of sleeping with the bearer of said device?

      Yeah, but eventually the battery dies. And *that's* when you make your move.

    24. Re:The One Ring! by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      Oh yea! Awesome! This way we can each have The One Ring.

      Er...

    25. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because those of us who can already have women in our lives.

    26. Re:The One Ring! by TrickyRaven · · Score: 1

      ... and in the airwaves bind them...

    27. Re:The One Ring! by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Trust me, wearing that ring, you will NEVER detect a woman ready to have sex with you.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    28. Re:The One Ring! by SpongeBobLinuxPants · · Score: 1

      Jugding from the pictures, this ring already has the ability to repel women faster than a calculator watch.

    29. Re:The One Ring! by suckmysav · · Score: 4, Funny

      "So it will keep me from cooking my cohones along with my microwave popcorn [...]
      Disclosure: I do wear a pocket protector.'


      You wear a pocket protector AND worry about your fertility?

      Love your optimism dude!

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    30. Re:The One Ring! by Steffan · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Why don't they invent one even more useful to:
      * Detect when women are horny
      * Detect when a woman has had enough to drink and will sleep with almost anyone
      * Detect when a woman has just broken up with a boy friend, and wants to 'show him' by sleeping with another man..
      * Warn you when YOU are drunk and hitting on the boss's wife at a party
      * One that shows she's gonna sleep with you, and not just leeching drinks off you at the bar"
      Answers:
      • 1. If you have to ask, she isn't
      • 2. If you need a ring for this, it won't be with you, anyway.
      • 3. See #2
      • 4. If you don't know if you're hitting on a woman or not, the answers to 1-3,5 shouldn't surprise you.
      • 5. She's not going to sleep with you, and yes, she is just leeching drinks off of you.
    31. Re:The One Ring! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      This ring does practically all of those, too. When the LED is on, it indicates all of those conditions (with the exception of drunken hitting on the boss' wife) are FALSE.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    32. Re:The One Ring! by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You are using the wrong techniques. When I go to clubs, I never buy girls drinks. Try dancing with them instead of wasting your money. You can tell if they are in to you if they dance closer/grind harder.. and that doesn't cost anything : )

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    33. Re:The One Ring! by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      %42%45%20%53%55%52%45%20%54%4f%20%44%52%49%4e%4b%2 0%59%4f%55%52%20%4f%56%41%4c%54%49%4e%45%2e

    34. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but eventually the battery dies. And *that's* when you make your move.

      By the time that happens you're going to need a haircut, manicure, pedicure, a shower and shave, and probably a change of underwear.

    35. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really know how to ruin a party, don't you?

    36. Re:The One Ring! by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      By the time that happens you're going to need a haircut, manicure, pedicure, a shower and shave, and probably a change of underwear.

      From my understanding, the standard population of slashdot probably needs at least 2 or 3 of these things anyway, eh?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    37. Re:The One Ring! by poningru · · Score: 1

      man woman no manual entry for woman

      --
      Calm down people, its a religion not an operating system.
    38. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The idea is that she won't charge for rape because then she'd have to admit to having sex with me.

    39. Re:The One Ring! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Detect when women are horny

      Just as often as men. Probably more often, because it's taboo.

      Detect when a woman has had enough to drink and will sleep with almost anyone

      Or did you mean, when you can take advantage of them and hopefuly they won't remember it?

      Detect when a woman has just broken up with a boy friend, and wants to 'show him' by sleeping with another man..

      Try the "conversation method."

      Warn you when YOU are drunk and hitting on the boss's wife at a party

      Now that's actually a good idea.

      One that shows she's gonna sleep with you, and not just leeching drinks off you at the bar

      If you need to ask...

      Women don't accept drinks because they find you attractive, they accept drinks because you're foolish enough to buy them, and in most cases they think you're just another loser trying to buy their attention. Develop a personality -- it's got a much higher success rate and you'll save loads of cash.

    40. Re:The One Ring! by TrickyRaven · · Score: 1

      we all know there is only one lord M$auron! and from the highest point in redmond his eye scours the land...

    41. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *rimshot*

    42. Re:The One Ring! by ModOut · · Score: 1

      no... no... NO! stop poisoning my head with your advertisements i like yoohoo!

    43. Re:The One Ring! by labeey · · Score: 0

      40 ft detection sucks ... if im 40ft close to a hotspot i will see it with my eyes i wont need a wifi ring

    44. Re:The One Ring! by DavidBAlford · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I interested in how you built one of the rings. Can you point me in the direction of where I could find the details to build one?

    45. Re:The One Ring! by qute · · Score: 1

      You must NEVER give a woman a drink just because she asks you. If you do it, she will see that you are weak and just rolls over.

      Say you will give her the drink for a kiss.
      Or something like that.

      --
      -- Make software not war
    46. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are a virgin aren't you....

    47. Re:The One Ring! by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      The Comment Heard Round the World as for the first time ever someone on Slashdot posts from experience.

    48. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have low hanging fruit, and I attract quality women.

    49. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to kill the funny dude.

    50. Re:The One Ring! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest holding out for some quality women instead of going for the low-hanging fruit...

      I guess he came to the latter because the first tactique didn't work for him. And if you are unable to reach the goal you've set, it is really idiotic to hang it even higher instead of somewhere inside your capabilities.

    51. Re:The One Ring! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      man woman
      no manual entry for woman

      Yeah, sure, because this is immoral. It has to be

      man wife

    52. Re:The One Ring! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      If you have to ask, she isn't

      You always have to, unless you want to risk being jailed for sexual harassment, like it happened before to men being that arrogant.

    53. Re:The One Ring! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Just as often as men.

      If that was true, it would be easier to get laid for a man than for a woman, because there are more women than men. But a simple reality check reveals that it is in fact much easier for a woman, although the number of possible mates is less.

    54. Re:The One Ring! by MegaHyster · · Score: 1

      They have one of these already, but it only compatible with OS XIX.

      --
      All good things...
    55. Re:The One Ring! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Too funny... though I think you're aiming too low. Desperation is rarely attractive to a woman, and trolling for drunks and barflies is likely to be unfulfilling."

      No not desperation...but, all the time, I hear "you won't meet nice women in bars". Where the hell else do you meet them? The few chicks that work in computer centers...are far from good looking. And besides..I know nice people go to bars...I'm nice and I go there...and it does help to get them a bit 'lubricated' with alcohol...and less inhibited.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    56. Re:The One Ring! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Disclosure: I do wear a pocket protector...

      You admitted that?

    57. Re:The One Ring! by Steffan · · Score: 1
      If you have to ask, she isn't
      You always have to, unless you want to risk being jailed for sexual harassment, like it happened before to men being that arrogant.

      1. You're taking the comment *way* too seriously

      2. It has nothing to do with arrogance, but perhaps *ignorance*. I reiterate...If you can't tell...She's not.

      3. Sexual harassment is something entirely different. I don't think it's a good idea to just approach anyone out of the blue and suggest the commencement of sexual relations. Again...If you have to ask...The answer is no. This does not imply the converse, a point perhaps lost on you.

    58. Re:The One Ring! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with arrogance

      What else is it when you think you can ? There are enough cases where men thought they "knew" and did not ask therefore.

      If you can't tell...She's not.

      I doesn't matter if you think you can or not, as you must know that what you think can be wrong.

      Sexual harassment is something entirely different.

      No. It may be only accidentally, but if you are wrong in a case you think you don't have to ask, it is just that.

      out of the blue

      Nobody said something about "out of the blue"[*], and it doesn't have to be a plain "do you want to ...?".

      If you have to ask...The answer is no. This does not imply the converse

      I once heard a woman say something like "the answer is always no until I tell the guy otherwise". So, you 'll have an always-no-problem if you think you don't have to ask.

      [*] A friend of mine once, after some pubs on a friday night, approached a woman on the street with the words "Hi! Your place or mine?" She examined him a little, said "your place!" and they left me standing rather astonished. So, the idea is not always bad. :-)

    59. Re:The One Ring! by Steffan · · Score: 1

      Okay...You're *totally* missing the point. In fact, you're arguing my point. What part of this don't you understand?
      If you have to ask...The answer is no. This does not imply the converse

    60. Re:The One Ring! by Kosi · · Score: 1

      Okay...You're *totally* missing the point. In fact, you're arguing my point. What part of this don't you understand?

      What part of "thinking you needn't ask is arrogant and can get you to jail" and "the answer is always no until stated otherwise, which means you always have to ask" don't you understand?

    61. Re:The One Ring! by Steffan · · Score: 1

      It's become clear to me that I cannot overcome your lack of comprehension of the original post. Don't both replying.

  2. Lack of range by fembots · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The maximum detection range appeared to be roughly 40 feet (line of sight), which is not exactly great, but this can likely be blamed on the antenna...

    He doesn't mind

    However, who would want to detect a Wi-Fi if he's not going to use it? If you're already a mobile user, it might be easier to just use your device's auto-detection software.

    I agree that there are times when I wish I could have detected the signal before I take out my laptop, but I usually solve that problem by starting up my PDA first.

    1. Re:Lack of range by chris09876 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are other ways to detect a WiFi signal. ...but how many of them are as cool and uber nerd like as this? :)

    2. Re:Lack of range by PMJ2kx · · Score: 1

      Aw, don't be such a stick-in-the-mud. We all know how to detect Wi-Fi networks. This just makes it fun.

    3. Re:Lack of range by LadyVirharper · · Score: 1

      I personally would use it on daily out-and-about walking or whatever--going to pick something up from the store or mall? Bring it with, look at it periodically. I probably wouldn't have anything I could connect on me, but in the future I would know if so-and-so cafe or whatever was a "hotspot".

    4. Re:Lack of range by Cecil · · Score: 1

      There are those of us who only have a laptop, y'know.

      A PDA is a mighty expensive 802.11 detector.

  3. The ring's oath by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In brightest day, in darkest night
    No Wi-Fi shall escape my sight
    Let those who worship broadband's might
    Beware my power, my ring's LED light!

    1. Re:The ring's oath by wiresquire · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the fair maiden
      it did not save.
      the LED lit up
      passing a microwave

      And a wireless phone
      in the 2.4GHz band
      again did cause
      light on my hand.

      --

      So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

    2. Re:The ring's oath by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't the ring have a green LED for that oath?

      --
      -- Alastair
    3. Re:The ring's oath by sunjin · · Score: 1

      This ring finds Hot Spots All say it is for the geek Now I want one too

  4. But that's not all! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Funny

    It also can tell you if your microwave oven is working! (and how much leakage you're absorbing by standing in front of it)

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:But that's not all! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      ...and indeed, if it IS a microwave oven and not just some overpowered candle. I'm sold on this.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  5. But can it detect my boss coming near me? by stephenisu · · Score: 1

    Just plant a 2.4ghz bug on him?

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:But can it detect my boss coming near me? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Just plant a 2.4ghz bug on him?

      Or in him, a la Fat Bastard...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  6. One Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One ring to detect them all...

  7. Ironically... by Sheetrock · · Score: 0
    The ring will probably be illegal in anti-wardriving jurisdictions.

    Although one wonders if 802.11g should be illegal as well -- if it can light up an LED with the juice it's pouring into the air, what else might it be doing that we're not aware of yet?

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Ironically... by Xshare · · Score: 1

      There's a battery or something inside the thing that powers it. What they meant by the voltage was the voltage that the circuit sends as a result of having picked up an RF frequency. *Radio frequency frequency?

    2. Re:Ironically... by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 1

      RTFA - The picture on the page clearly shows the battery that the ring contains to light the LED...

    3. Re:Ironically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the LED is probably powered by the battery.

    4. Re:Ironically... by merlin_jim · · Score: 4, Funny


      if it can light up an LED with the juice it's pouring into the air, what else might it be doing that we're not aware of yet?

      Did you even bother to look at the prototype? It's mostly battery. I mean come on, you click the link, and there is ONE, count them ONE image on that page.

      Let's not make fear inciting "radiation is bad" posts without AT LEAST reading the story first? Just a suggestion...

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    5. Re:Ironically... by maddh · · Score: 1

      Its not lighting up with the juice that is in the air. it just detects the "juice" in the air while the watch battery both powers the detection IC and lights up the LED.

    6. Re:Ironically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit - it can power the battery and the LED light. Cool.

    7. Re:Ironically... by mattspammail · · Score: 1
      Re: your sig

      That was Yoda, not Spock.

      Proof

      Please forgive me if you were trying for humor. It was lost on me. (I had a long day.)

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
  8. Wedding ring? by Jason_D_Berg · · Score: 5, Funny

    The perfect nerd wedding ring!!! Now all I gotta do is find a girl that'll be ok with that.

    1. Re:Wedding ring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or a sheep.

    2. Re:Wedding ring? by kernelfoobar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah! Sheep don't have fingers...
      Monkeys do though...

      --
      Here we go again!
    3. Re:Wedding ring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dam, you stole my thoughts... it'd be cool - and yeah, my wife might like it too. Gotta love girl geeks with physics degrees and high IQ!

    4. Re:Wedding ring? by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

      I think he was aluding to the sheeps ring

      --
      My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  9. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Not shown on the underside: a crystal and tiny on/off switch.)

    That is completely functional.... hopefully you do not have to ever close your hand.

  10. My fiancee thinks she wants a diamond... by mfender9 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...but I'm sure she'll prefer one of these!

    1. Re:My fiancee thinks she wants a diamond... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      LIAR! No slashdot poster who thinks this ring is cool could possibly have a fiancee!

    2. Re:My fiancee thinks she wants a diamond... by aminorex · · Score: 1

      10 years from now, CVD diamonds will be worth about as much as a CZ, but the WiFi ring will still work.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  11. Cute but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Its not going to tell you if there's an available hotspot. Just because there's a signal doesn't mean it isn't WEP or 802.1x secured (yes WEP and Secure is an oxymoron, but still...). If its not then it's probably not free or is not one from a provider you may be subscribed to.

    Use a hotspot search engine instead like Dowza or WiFi 411. You'll have much better luck finding a usable hotspot with those kinds of things... Yeah I'm missing the point about geek factor...

    1. Re:Cute but... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      It's got a microprocessor in it... how much harder would it be to actually receive packets and determine if the source is running WEP or not? When I can use it for wardriving, THEN I'll buy a ring like this!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Cute but... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      And have it fit in a ring? Alot harder.
      That microprocessor is part of the AVR tiny family it really is tiny in size an power. I do not think it is currently possible to do what you want hand have it fit in a ring.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Cute but... by mattcoz · · Score: 1

      Future production units would feature surface-mounted components to decrease the detector profile and microcontrollers that discriminate between other RF sources, as well as indicate whether the Wi-Fi nodes are open/closed/encrypted, etc.

      See, if you would just read the article you would've known this.

    4. Re:Cute but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it necessairly have to decode packets? Why not just have it light up upon detection of some pattern? Like the 802.11 beacon. I'm sure there's a tiny DSP out there more than capable of this, with power consumption to enable a good runtime..

    5. Re:Cute but... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have to run at 802.11a/b/g speed or decode every packet... all it has to do is look at the header of an occaisonal packet, so ANY microprocessor should be able to do this, given an adequate buffer. If they can put a bluetooth receiver in an earphone, they should be able to put an 802.11 receiver in a ring! They can already fit both the receiver, transmitter, and an ARM processor on a single chip. Receive-only would be much lower power and smaller! Yes, it WOULD be very expensive to spin the silicon for a single chip solution for this... but it is well within the reach of current technology!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    6. Re:Cute but... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Notice I did not say impossibe. Just very very hard. I will stang by the not currently possible. Until you get that custom chip made.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  12. Better than a secret decoder ring! by dilvie · · Score: 1

    I think it's great. My laptop is not very portable, and my PDA is from the stone ages. It'd be cool to see where the hotspots are, whether I've got a device with me or not -- just for future reference. =) What would be really neat is if hotspots were visible on a map that I could access from anywhere. Does anything like that exist yet?

    1. Re:Better than a secret decoder ring! by hungarian_sausage · · Score: 1

      http://wigle.net/ Has just what you need.

  13. Cordless Phones by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't cordless phones set this thing off constantly?

    1. Re:Cordless Phones by mzwaterski · · Score: 1

      Yup, and he even says the same in TFA.

    2. Re:Cordless Phones by LadyVirharper · · Score: 1

      How many people use cordless phones in public? Chances are if you're inside, you or the owner of the house already knows if they have a cordless phone and/or wireless, and if you're outside downtown, you'll probably won't be around homes. Or would cellphones interfere too? I'm a bit of a phone-phobe...I dislike using a phone.

    3. Re:Cordless Phones by SlayerofGods · · Score: 5, Funny
      How many people use cordless phones in public?
      You may not have heard about this, but radio waves go through walls now.
      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    4. Re:Cordless Phones by stinkyfingers · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't cordless phones set this thing off constantly?

      Or would cordless phones keep it from working correctly?

    5. Re:Cordless Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may not have heard about this, but radio waves fall of at with the square of the distance. Now only that, but 2.4 GHz doesn't do walls very well. Hell, it doesn't go through my window screens at all. It just bounce off!

  14. Perfect gift.. by Folmer · · Score: 1

    Im gonna make one for my girlfriend.. I'm sure she will love it :)

    1. Re:Perfect gift.. by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 5, Funny

      Propose to her. Get down on one knee and ask, "will you...tell me when we near a 2.4GHz signal?"

    2. Re:Perfect gift.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going to pop the big question? You know, whether she'll network with you?

    3. Re:Perfect gift.. by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if she doesn't dump you, THEN propose for real! It can't fail.

  15. there can be only one by dealdetectives · · Score: 0

    wow that ring is sweet! let me guess, forged in the fires of mount doom?

    1. Re:there can be only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close.. Mount Doom3, actually.

  16. How we do this in Crankerville... by Thud457 · · Score: 1
    "Hello, is your access point running?

    Well you better go catch it!"

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  17. The ring can only be destroyed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...in the heart of Mount Doom by microwaving it with a bag of popcorn.

  18. Concept Pictures by CypherXero · · Score: 1

    Wow, the concept pictures look nothing like the prototype. Hopefully they can work on making it aesthetically pleasing. Maybe they should call up Apple?

    1. Re:Concept Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then it would cost $400 and be called the iRing

    2. Re:Concept Pictures by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      As they said, in the production model everything will be surface mounted, so the bulk of the small PCB board will not be there, and everything can be curved to fit into a largish ring, although not as large as it is now. With some tasteful decoration, it could almost pass for a high school ring. Sadly, geeks who design electronics AND their cases never have any sense of style, so I am sure this thing will end up being neon green and flashing with 18 blue LEDs.

    3. Re:Concept Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uRang?

  19. The perfect jewelry for wardriving! by Thijs+van+As · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ear-, nose- and belly button- rings will be available soon!

    1. Re:The perfect jewelry for wardriving! by new+death+barbie · · Score: 1

      Ummm, what good is an ear- or nose-ring that lights up when wardriving? How would you know?

      Belly-button ring, maybe. But only if you're not the one driving...

      --

      It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

    2. Re:The perfect jewelry for wardriving! by zackeller · · Score: 1

      New from BMW - Dashboard light shows when near an unsecured access point!

  20. Don't forget microwaves... by PMJ2kx · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article: "Due to the simplicity of the circuit design, the prototype unit does not discriminate between other sources of 2.4GHz RF, eg. "leaky" microwave ovens, cordless phones, etc. Future production units would feature surface-mounted components to decrease the detector profile and microcontrollers that discriminate between other RF sources, as well as indicate whether the Wi-Fi nodes are open/closed/encrypted, etc."

    Yes, but they're going to fix that.

  21. RTFA by SlayerofGods · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Due to the simplicity of the circuit design, the prototype unit does not discriminate between other sources of 2.4GHz RF, eg. "leaky" microwave ovens, cordless phones, etc.

    --

    Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
  22. Why use a CPU? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

    Pardon me for pointing out that this is overly complicated. You've got a tuned-circuit detector looking for a particular frequency. That's rectified into a DC voltage. Why didn't they use an analog comparator chip to light the LED? You can't tell me that the A/D plus CPU-and-software is a simpler solution.

    They mention a future revision doing interpretation of the open/closed/encrypted state of the WiFi node, but that's going to need a real front-end, not just a diode power detector. If they decoded the packets, I'd be impressed. So far, I'm not.

    1. Re:Why use a CPU? by winavr · · Score: 1, Informative

      You just answered your own question (why they need a cpu).

      "They mention a future revision doing interpretation of the open/closed/encrypted state of the WiFi node".

      Sounds like they'll need a cpu to do that, unless you think they can do that just with an analog comparator chip.

    2. Re:Why use a CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mods, bring parent up, he hit the spot, the guy wasted a micro-controler and crystal (for the clock) when a simple comparator and multi-vibrator (if you really need the led to flash instead of just being ON) would do the job at a fraction of the cost/size

    3. Re:Why use a CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Not to mention the absence of a flux capacitor.

    4. Re:Why use a CPU? by sam_da_mann · · Score: 1

      Well, you detector will also light up for most cordless phones, microwaves, ect

    5. Re:Why use a CPU? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Well, they won't be able to do that with just the detected signal, the way things are at the moment. All the "RF" side of the ring does is produce a small DC voltage around 2.4GHz signals. You can't even work out if it *is* a wifi signal from that...

    6. Re:Why use a CPU? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      RTFA. Right now they are only using a basic signal detector, but at the bottom of the page it states that they are hoping to add other features such as encryption detection and signal filtering that would require a CPU.

    7. Re:Why use a CPU? by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      It'll require some additional logic and (i suspect) a more powerful CPU. It's not like you'll be able to flash this design and make it more capable.

    8. Re:Why use a CPU? by Migraineman · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, the RF section of this device takes in RF energy and puts out DC. There's no information content in DC. Just an indication of the RF input level that's proportional to the DC level. Once the signal is converted to DC, there's no way to extract any information about the modulated data signal. The current design is a blinky-light, and is a completely wasteful use of a microprocessor.

      Any future device that intends to interpret the information modulated onto the carrier will need a form of downconverter. I don't care what kind is implemented, but it's going to need to be a honest-to-ghod receiver. That's much more complicated than a simple peak detector. I'll be impressed when they put the receiver in there. Until then ... meh.

    9. Re:Why use a CPU? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      I did RTFA. Great, a future application may need a microprocessor. Why is one in there *now*? It's not like a software upgade will magically transform the diode dettector into a superheterodyne receiver.

      If you're trying to cram functionality into a restricted space, like a ring, you don't go adding extra cruft willy-nilly. If they intend to get anywhere near to what the pretty concept drawings look like, they're going to need to shave a metric crapload of cruft off the existing design. And that's before they put a real receiver in it. The battery they have is large compared to the concept packaging. The crytal package (on the not-visible bottom of the board) is probably not available in a package conducive to ring-encapsulation. They've got some serious mechanical hurdles to deal with before they get *anywhere* near the pretty marketing-concept drawings.

    10. Re:Why use a CPU? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, why do they need a crystal for ?
      AFAIK, ATtiny's have their own built-in oscillator.
      Plus the fact that they don't really need a CPU. My guess is that they don't know shit about analogue electronics, that's why.

    11. Re:Why use a CPU? by Migraineman · · Score: 1

      If the crystal isn't being used to run the CPU, it's gotta be part of the carrier detection filter. Or maybe they just soldered-on a bunch of random components because the marketing dweeb said it needed to look more "high tech."

    12. Re:Why use a CPU? by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      It is more of a proof of concept. After all, they want to make sure they can fit and power a CPU in the form factor they want before they spend years writing its OS in assembler and binary to fit in its teeny memory. Once they know the hardware works, they start working on the software. Oh, and firmware upgrades would be easy. Simply put it next to your microwave and punch in the exact right defrost program, and volla!, version 2.0.

  23. No excuse to wear a ring? by jm91509 · · Score: 1

    What about marriage?

    Never mind...

    1. Re:No excuse to wear a ring? by BigDawgES · · Score: 1

      For those of you who have no excuse to wear a ring,

      I choose not to wear a ring, you insensitive clod!

  24. Married by MonkeyCookie · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perfect for the geek who wants to be married to technology rather than another person.

    Nothing says commitment to your true love technology like one of these rings.

    1. Re:Married by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at least when the ring flash you know a good time is about to begin.

    2. Re:Married by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      'Wifi is forever'

    3. Re:Married by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We met in a chatroom, now our love can really bloom
      Sure the world wide web is great, but you, you make me salivate
      Yes I love technology, but not as much as you, you see
      But I still love technology

  25. And... by jfroot · · Score: 4, Funny

    it looks great too!

  26. It's a Reverse Wedding Ring by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rather than signalling to women around you that you've already got someone willing to spend the rest of her life with you, this ring indicates (and guarantees) that pretty much that no woman will ever want to be with you.

    1. Re:It's a Reverse Wedding Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you and I had the same exact idea, with the same title, within minutes of each other. I mean, look two comments down. If this keeps up, I may have to propose with one of these things.

    2. Re:It's a Reverse Wedding Ring by kanweg · · Score: 1

      You'll attract uptown women with cool PowerBooks having mediocre 802.g reception, and in need of a white knight to send out the e-mail. You're of many to regret Apple's market share.

      Bert

    3. Re:It's a Reverse Wedding Ring by shadow303 · · Score: 1

      Funny, they always seem to figure that out even though I don't have one of these rings.

      --
      I've got a mind like a steel trap - it's got an animal's foot stuck in it.
    4. Re:It's a Reverse Wedding Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... I'm only interested in women that would wear a ring like this...
      Have you really never met a really good looking woman who was :
      ...SysAdm on a Tru64 UNIX
      ...Oracle developer
      ...Domino Admin
      ...Oracle DBA
      ...SysAdm on NetBSD

  27. should make a watch instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The designers should consider making this a watch instead of a ring. That way they can also design a UI for the watch's display, and you would have more room for bulk on your wrist than on your finger.

    1. Re:should make a watch instead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but than what would I do with my usb memory watch

  28. Reverse Wedding Ring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    This can be the reverse-wedding ring. As a wedding ring indicates that you're taken, this ring can indicate that you are most definitely single. After all, no sane girlfriend/fiance/wife would allow you to step out the door with your "WiFi detecting ring" no matter how cool you thought your witty references to the Lord of the Ring were.

    1. Re:Reverse Wedding Ring by Luke-Jr · · Score: 1

      My wife has given me permission (conditional on that she can use it sometimes)! Now if only I knew how to build one...

      --
      Luke-Jr
  29. Atmel's AVR Tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Atmel's AVR Tiny is a microcontroller, not (just) a microprocessor. Small but important difference!

    1. Re:Atmel's AVR Tiny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually Atmel's AVR Tiny is a subfamily of the AVR family of 8-bit RISC microcontrollers, smartass.

  30. Finally by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally, a resolution to all those wedding ring & diamond related discussions on slashdot.

    --

    There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  31. Dowza Dowaz Dowza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man just use Dowza www.dowza.com It doesn't make you look like a borg and you'll find more hotspots.

  32. I want a vibrating pocket version by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1

    This is TRES KEWL!

    geezze just might give one to my girl!

    1. Re:I want a vibrating pocket version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. You have a girl. Sure. We believe you.

  33. PCB on the ring? by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Now I don't know what sort of PCB the maker means in the layout, but the ring better not use this kind--it's known for pollution.

    Is it a printed circuit board as I think and hope it is? Looks like it...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    1. Re:PCB on the ring? by bigtangringo · · Score: 1

      ... the latter.

      --
      Yes, I am a smart ass; it's better than the alternative.
    2. Re:PCB on the ring? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh?

  34. hihihi.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh my god, that one is soooo gay. *smile*

  35. The Downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...is that the Eye will find you and send out the ringwraiths when you wear it. Bummer.

    1. Re:The Downside... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus, it was clearly not working. He was wearing it but we could still see him.

  36. Three rings by rlp · · Score: 3, Informative

    That'll look real nice right next to my Java ring. :-)

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Three rings by game+kid · · Score: 1

      I love any ring that draws the Mandelbrot Set.

      Now if something can do that and let you make cool pictures, I'd be really impres--oh wait...

      (Of course if your ring can run that I am quite jealous.)

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:Three rings by KennyP · · Score: 1

      I have java rings all over my desk.

      Damn housekeeping... Why won't they clean up my coffee spills?

      Visualize Whirled P.'s

    3. Re:Three rings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huhuh.

  37. Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkill! by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why use a microprocessor when you can have the DC voltage from the rectified 2.4Ghz signal turn on a transistor which activates a flashing LED (or an analog flasher circuit). Surely that kind of arrangement would use much less power than running a processor (even a "tiny" one) all of the time.

    -b.

  38. Valentine's day is coming up... by racazip · · Score: 1

    A perfect gift! First, I give my girlfriend the ring... then I finally have an excuse to sing the famous song from Napoleon Dynomite. Why do you love me? Why do you need me? Always and forever... We met in a chatroom, now our love can fully bloom... Sure the world wide web is great, but you, you make my salivate... I love technology, but not as much as you, you see... But I STILL love technology... Always and forever. Our love is like a flock of doves, flying up to heaven above... always and forever, always and forever... Why do you need me? Why do you love me? Always and forever...

    1. Re:Valentine's day is coming up... by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      you realize of course she will take this as an (geeky) engagement ring. then you're down the chute and into the meat grinder, brother

  39. Re:The One Ring! Interesting by Mr.+Falco · · Score: 1

    Nice idea but is it really practical. What about the security risks? Is this also going to be involved with the 802.11i protocol? If these concerns are addressed then it is truly the master ring. Which will find them all and in the darkness bind them.

  40. Well... by grasshoppa · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it's better than this secret decoder ring I've been using since I was 8.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  41. Re:Jenny JEnny by Deagol · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Offtopic, perhaps. But that chick's got the nicest ass I've seen all week. Thanks for the link. :)

  42. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Scenario: A man and a woman are getting married, they've picked out the wedding rings.

    During the ceremony she puts on his ring... he looks down and sees Wifi is available!

    "Sweet! I can get wireless here"

    Man proceeds to dig out his laptop and posts online to the world that he just got married while chatting with a few of his buddies on AIM and announcing to his guild members in World of Warcraft.

    This marriage will last shorter than Britney Spears' Vegas get-a-away.

  43. A whistle? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Funny
    The last time a ring was this cool was with a decoder and a whistle and came in a cereal box.

    Let me guess what frequency it blew, Cap'n...

    1. Re:A whistle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2600Hz.

    2. Re:A whistle? by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1
      2600Hz.

      Thank you, Captain Fucking Obvious - er, Crunch.

  44. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen, my thoughts exactly. Have they ever heard of a 555 timer, I wonder?

  45. new by my_haz · · Score: 0, Troll

    More visible then the cook ring. The wifi ring gives your average joe six pack the ability to pick out teh ghey with little or no effort.

    1. Re:new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B- for effort. F for implementation.

  46. Why does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does some mildy usefull device cause the masses of geeks to post bad comments on slashdot. (including this one). Why do we think we're funny, and wanna post something funny, not know what it is we think is so funny about it, and then make something stupid up. Now I realize how geeks could be used as a derogitory term (that usage of the term was never apparent to me until now) In any case, If I had to have on ring that infomed me of anything in my area, it would be a pencil sharpener indicater. I can't seem to find these anywhere!

  47. Wrong solution to wrong problem by Locke2005 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm married. I need a reason NOT to wear a ring!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Wrong solution to wrong problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Say it will attract rotating machinery and high voltages. My job hardly involves any of this - but who's to know?

    2. Re:Wrong solution to wrong problem by IPFreely · · Score: 1
      Bah.

      My wife found my ring once when I wasn't wearing it, and hid it from me for six months to teach me a lesson.

      The lesson I learned was that I don't need to wear a ring, and I haven't for the last two years.

      --
      There is nothing so silly as other peoples traditions, and nothing so sacred as our own.
    3. Re:Wrong solution to wrong problem by Kosi · · Score: 1

      man divorce

    4. Re:Wrong solution to wrong problem by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Tighten the ring a bit so that it constricts the blood circulation so that the finger eventually falls off. If your wife is reasonable she won't force you to wear it after that.

      This technique also works well with neck ties if your boss demands that you wear one.

  48. Precious by Petronius · · Score: 3, Funny

    ubergeek is when you go around calling it "my precious".

    --
    there's no place like ~
    1. Re:Precious by moby · · Score: 1

      LOL LOL LOL !

  49. Uh oh... by Cytlid · · Score: 1

    Due to the simplicity of the circuit design, the prototype unit does not discriminate between other sources of 2.4GHz RF, eg. "leaky" microwave ovens, cordless phones, etc.

    It's the one ring to detect them all?

    --
    FLR
  50. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can get attiny11s microcontrollers at a lower cost than most (not all, admittedly) 555s. They'll run on an internal RC oscillator and don't require external components to set timing intervals. For many applications it wouldn't surprise me if people used that as an alternative to a 555.

  51. Where's the cicuit diagram? by danimrich · · Score: 1

    I might not be the only one who'd like to build someting similar.

    --
    where's all that Karma?
  52. Ob. LOTR by xRelisH · · Score: 3, Funny

    One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them (Wi-Fi networks)
    One Ring to bring them all, and in the darkness bind them. ( Download porn! )

  53. Pretty much useless by Etyenne · · Score: 1
    Due to the simplicity of the circuit design, the prototype unit does not discriminate between other sources of 2.4GHz RF, eg. "leaky" microwave ovens, cordless phones, etc.

    Considering WiFi networks are just one type of device running on 2.4 Ghz, expect many false positive. In a urban setting, the ISM band is pretty much saturated so your LED will most probably stay a solid green.

    Also, I have doubts about the sensitivity of their antenna design.

    --
    :wq
  54. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by shawb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be able to add the future ability to differentiate between a hotspot and a microwave?

    --
    I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  55. PATENT... by Efialtis · · Score: 1

    I sure hope this guy got a patent on this thing... or, in the true spirit of Open Source, he should publish the parts list and build instructions... Neat idea...I can see it now...a Detector Ring for the UNSECURED wi-fi network...Detector Ring to identify A/B/G networks, or networks on 900mhz, 2.4, or 5.8 ghz... Endless possibilities...

    --
    --E--
  56. And we frown upon that... by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    Normally using an excessive amount of technology to achieve something pointless is something we love to see here..

  57. Birth Control Ring For Males by angedinoir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally another form of birth control for males.

  58. Re:Jenny JEnny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There shouldn't be any limits to immigration for hot brazillian chicks. I mean, we need more maids that look like that.

  59. you don't get it, do you? by amyhughes · · Score: 0, Troll
    You and at least five moderators just don't get it. Probabbly predicted the ipod would fail, didn't you?

    :-)

    Amy

  60. Finally! by KennyP · · Score: 1

    Jewelry worth wearing! Forget form - it's all FUNCTION!

    And all it really needs is to be encased in tinted epoxy (yes - it means dead battery = dead ring)

    Time to order some parts online!

    Visualize Whirled P.'s

  61. Of course a l337 ring would.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    ... blink the uc(SSID) in Morse code..

    1. Re:Of course a l337 ring would.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... blink the uc(SSID) in Morse code..

      Nah, the ultimate 1337 ring would blink the SSID out in binary! Morse code is for pussies!

    2. Re:Of course a l337 ring would.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Morse is more efficient than ASCII or any other standard char-based encoding... Morse uses between 1 and 4 bits for letters, 4 bits for numbers and 6 bits for punctuation.. Not only that, but it's optimized for common text (in order to save operators' fingers, talk about 19th century compression!) in that the shortest sequences go to the most common letters. For example, 'E' is a single bit (dot), 'A' is two bits (dot dash), etc...

      An interesting project IMHO would be to try and build, say, a gutenberg text as a binary file encoded in Morse, to see what kind of compressability that would offer.. Hmm........

    3. Re:Of course a l337 ring would.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      oops, 5 bits for numbers, typo :p

  62. How about a vibrating clit ring model!! by dos4who · · Score: 1
    Now there's one way to get my wife to walk into Best Buy!


    On second thought... She'd never leave...


    --
    "Yes, I have a Disaster Recovery Plan. It's called my Resume"
  63. surface mount? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have thought the proto type would have been surface mount to reduce size. And 2 prototype been on flex board ie glued on. Note I would have never stuck a brick like that on my finger just for a prototype. Hmm someone the steath wifi network detector. Yep looks like a standard watch just with a wifi detect option.

  64. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    802.11 was designed for LAN's. Hot spots will be obsolete in a couple of years when 802.16 hits the market.

  65. Keychain by ehiris · · Score: 1

    Why not just use a keychain that does that?

    1. Re:Keychain by XyborX · · Score: 1

      I wonder if all of these WiFi-detectors tell me that the probes from my laptop means there is a network nearby. I currently have just one of those gadgets (not the thinkgeek keychain, though), and I'm disappointed. Whenever I flip the WiFi switch on my laptop to On, it tells me "Oh, there's a network nearby, with very strong signal". And it even has a microcontroller for analyzing the signals..

      Not buying any more of those crappy things, unless the box explicitly tells me that it only shows accesspoint beacons, preferably without encryption.

      --
      // Just my few cents
  66. Dangerous, but cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    if it can light up an LED with the juice it's pouring into the air, what else might it be doing that we're not aware of yet?


    The prototype shown in TFA can also recharge a tiny battery. Well, that must be the reason why there's a battery in the ring...

  67. and another... by amyhughes · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Another moderator that doesn't get it. Let me explain it to you humorless wankers...

    A watch that detects wifi is curious, maybe even useful to some dorks, but it's not cool. A keychain that detects wifi is curious but not cool. A PDA that detects wireless isn't even curious.

    This ring is cool because it's a ring. Ever hear of a secret decoder ring? Why do you think it keeps coming up here? Were you never a kid? Are you not even a nerd?

    :-)

    Amy

    1. Re:and another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHUT UP.

    2. Re:and another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      women can't drive

    3. Re:and another... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just use that as an excuse for not coming over.

  68. In brightest day, in darkest night, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no wi-fi signal shall escape my sight. Let those who worship IE's might, beware my power...

    Dammit, I need to stop drinking.

    1. Re:In brightest day, in darkest night, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, especially since this was already joked about near the start of the comments.

  69. Hmm... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    ..is that the Eye will find you and send out the ringwraiths when you wear it. Bummer.

    I was not aware we were calling network security folk Ringwraiths now.

    However, I have to admit that it does not seem totally out of line... :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  70. What's the point? by real+gumby · · Score: 1

    I really like this from the cool factor point of view, but it raises a practical question for me.

    I have never understood the keychain access point finders. Since they can't tell me if the net is open (much less if it's a protected one I have a key for) it isn't much more than, well, a radiation detector.

    Worse, because of (3-space) registration issues, interference, etc. it can find access points that are from a practical standpoint electrically inaccessible to my laptop.


    But this ring, that's something different, and very cool.

    1. Re:What's the point? by maxwells_deamon · · Score: 1

      I have a Hawking one. Looks very much like a cell phone. I have used it mostly as a toy but it is directional and is very useful when doing a security audit. I can quickly find transmitters without having to play games every time I loose a connection.

      I wish it had LCD which would display SSID/channel info.

    2. Re:What's the point? by real+gumby · · Score: 1

      Security audits are a good application I hadn't thought of.

  71. Finally, there is an excuse! by mynickwastaken · · Score: 0

    q: are you maried?!
    a: no, it's just my "2.4GHz Wi-Fi Detector Ring"

  72. Nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone notice how in the comments there's like 10,000 references to the One Ring from LotR and maybe one or two references to engagement rings or wedding rings?

    Looks like there's a difference between what most people think about and what the Slashdot crowd thinks about...

  73. Don't understand the lifestyle by iamacat · · Score: 1

    If I need network access, I either want to have it right at the moment or at least know where to go to get online for sure. I can not imagine lugging a notebook all over the place just in case I get lucky. Better to get bluetooth interface to a GPRS phone in addition to WiFi. But then the ring will only be marginally useful. Of course maybe it's intended just as a curiosity anyway.

  74. Imagine when its not a prototype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that fuckers gonna be a big ass bitch slapping pimp ring... http://images.google.com/images?q=pimp+ring&hl=en& btnG=Google+Search

  75. Bring on the mood rings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Mood Rings"
    by Reliant K

    we all know the girls that i am talking about
    well they are time bombs and they are ticking
    and the only question's when they'll blow up
    and they'll blow up; we know that without a doubt
    cause they're those girls, yeah you know those girls that let their emotions get the best of them

    and i've contrived some sort of a plan to help my fellow man
    let's get emotional girls to all wear mood rings
    so we'll be tipped off to when they're ticked off
    cause we'll know just what they're thinking
    cause what they're thinking...

    she's so pretty but she but doesn't always act that way
    her mood's out swinging on the swing set almost every day
    she said to me that she's so happy it's depressing
    and all i said was "someone get that girl a mood ring"

    if it's drama you want then look no further
    they're like the real world meets boy meets world meets days of our lives
    and it just kills me how they get away with murder
    they'll anger you then bat their eyes; those pretty eyes that watch you sympathize

    and i've contrived some sort of a plan to help my fellow man
    let's get emotional girls to all wear mood rings
    so we'll be tipped off to when they're ticked off
    cause we'll know just what they're thinking
    cause what they're thinking...

    she's so pretty but she but doesn't always act that way
    her mood's out swinging on the swing set almost every day
    she said to me that she's so stressed out that it's soothing
    and all i said was "someone get that girl a mood ring"

    cause when it's black (it) means watch your back because you're probably
    the last person in the world right now she wants to see
    and when it's blue it means that you should call her up immediately
    and ask her out because she'll most likely agree
    and when it's green it simply means that she is really stressed
    and when it's clear it means she's completely emotionless (and that's all right i must confess)

    we all know the girls that i am talking about
    she liked you wednesday but now it's friday and she has to wash her hair
    and it just figures that we'll never figure them out
    first she's jekyll and then she's hyde....at least she makes a lovely pair

    mood ring oh mood ring
    oh tell me will you bring
    the key to unlock this mystery
    of girls and their emotions
    play it back in slow motion
    so i may understand the complex infrastructure known as the female mind

    [speaking:]
    heh...that's terrible

  76. perfect for bullies by moe613 · · Score: 1

    This is great for bullies, now if someone is looking to beat up a nerd all they have to do is set up a wireless network and wait for a nerd to home in on it. Almost like a fish finder.

  77. Should I propose with this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me: Will you marry me? It is a 802.11b/g wifi single finder!
    Her: You bastard, I use 802.11a

    Oh well, I guess it was never meant to be, we are totally incompatible

  78. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by bob+beta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, you might discover (through experimentation, or whatever) that inserting a processor in-line with an 'LED flasher' circuit can actually save significant power over just blinking the LED itself.

    This is due to some esoteric details of how an LED is most efficiently driven. I learned when I was developing firmware for some small hand-held medical devices that used a Microcontroller (an NEC 4-bit controller) that you can actually get greater efficiency (more light output per power consumed) by driving LEDs with a VERY high current for a very short duty. Drive them to 100 mA or so at a 1% duty cycle, for starters, and experiment with high drive current and duty cycle. There is a dramatic current savings over driving an LED with a DC level to get equivalent brightness.

    The power saving achived by this means will likely be more than enough to power the processor, if it's one of the tiny micro-power processors. Use one of the little 8 pin PIC parts or what-not.

    There- interesting (hopefully) topic drift.

  79. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of you have any idea how little power you get from the 2.4 GHz carrier. Unless you're talking about sticking your hand in a microwave.

  80. Note by olvr · · Score: 1

    Do not eat Wi-Fi Detector Ring

  81. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by JasontheMason · · Score: 1
    Actually, you probably want to amplify the signal before rectifying it - first, the few millivolts the antenna picks up won't be enough to turn on the diode, and second, the LED is a diode. Just amplify the AC signal, trust me, it's a lot easier. (I've just completed two weeks on diodes/transistor theory, FWIW.)

    Doing it this way you might be able to get the circuit down to a couple transistors, necessary resistors for biasing, and a battery.

    Now, the problem with doing things this way is that it will pick up any RF - I think the microchip is used to tune to 2.4GHz and only trigger on that frequency band. The chip and supporting components are probably a bit smaller size than what you'd get if you tried to construct a simple RLC bandpass filter with discreet components, too.

    --
    "Ad infinitem et ultra!" - Buzz Lightyear
  82. Cuff links? by Delita · · Score: 1

    That thing makes an awfully ugly ring, but would be a perfect set of cuff links to go with my circuitboard business card case.

  83. i know it might be a stretch but... by Nomadic_Z · · Score: 1

    i can see something like this being useful to hikers, or campers or anyone like that who would get lost. I know wi-fi is way to limited for this type of thing, but maybe someday when they figure out how to get a better signal. The ring could show people the way if they get lost. Meh, just a thought.

    1. Re:i know it might be a stretch but... by shawngiese · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at the current 30 feet they'd have to blind not to see the house where the microwave oven/ access point is beaming from.

      Spinning around trying to find the signal strength might not help after a few days without food.

      Maybe with a built in GPS sytem and use the LED to beam the map out of the ring would be better. Or with one of those super LEDs you could make a beacon and just shine it up (of course trying to avoid any airplanes).

  84. Re:Jenny JEnny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could also say "all month", especially today ;)
    OK, this was a spam I received and I thought it'd add value to my FP (seems that I just clicked a 1 sec too late).
    I just forgot to check the post anonymously box but "heck" :
    This got me 3 /.ers on my fan list :-D

  85. Yeah, Right by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    I thought I saw Angelina Jolie wearing one of these at the awards shows...

    This has to be the height of Geek Moron...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  86. Wearable USB Earrings by MudDude · · Score: 1
    Sounds like fun, a wearable ring detecting wireless networks.

    Actually, what I am looking for is USB memorysticks (or similar) that can be worn as earrings.

    Any suggestions? They can make that stuff really small, right?

    --
    You don't need to see my .sig. This isn't the .sig you're looking for...
  87. Best use of a microprocessor by po8 · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness there's a processor in that thing. How else could it sense a DC voltage and light up an LED?

    Ubergeeks are so cool...

  88. Re:The One Ring! Interesting by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    jesus people. "security risks"? it's an RF detector. end of (very poor) story.

  89. Overengineering by badfish99 · · Score: 1

    It needs a microprocessor to "detect the presence of a DC voltage" ???

  90. a bold man will still make his move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (sick i know)

  91. Re:The ring's haiku by dmneoblade · · Score: 1

    I wore a new ring It is green with a signal Found a cordless phone

    --
    Warning, knife is sharp. Please keep out of children.
  92. Re:Silliness. Using a processor is massive overkil by PDAllen · · Score: 1

    So you would use a microchip to go from RF noise to detecting that close to 2.4Ghz there is a signal. Using a standard chip not designed specially for that purpose. Maybe think about how you would design the circuit to do that?

    What in fact is used to tune to 2.4GHz is the crystal it mentions being hidden round the back of the ring, as per standard.