Slashdot Mirror


Mac mini Maximized With 3.5" Drives

Demolition writes "You just knew that someone would get around to this, didn't you? In this how-to article from AppleTalk Australia, a step-by-step guide describes how to transplant a Mac mini into a micro-ATX case and a method to connect standard 3.5" hard drives to it (using do-it-yourself 2.5"-to-3.5" IDE adapters). Only some minor case modifications and some added cooling are needed to complete the project."

439 comments

  1. But what is the point? by Primotech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Part of the mac's allure is it's stylish looks. This is just as dumb as putting a PC in a mac mini case.

    1. Re:But what is the point? by fnj · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Part of the mac's allure is it's stylish looks. This is just as dumb as putting a PC in a mac mini case.

      I'm not following the logic. Agree completely on the Mac Mini looks, and even more, the unmatched form factor. Actually, it would be very cool indeed to put a PC in a Mac Mini "case". One is not going to have any luck doing this, though, because there is no PC with a small enough form factor. Not a Mini ITX, not even a Nano ITX.

    2. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:But what is the point? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Part of the mac's allure is it's stylish looks. This is just as dumb as putting a PC in a mac mini case.


      Well, maybe he wanted a more upgradeable Mac, and that was the best he could come up with.

      Waste of a good case if you ask me. ;-P

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:But what is the point? by metalhed77 · · Score: 1

      For me it would price. Which is where this makes sense.

      --
      Photos.
    5. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nano ITX is roughly 3/2 of an inch smaller than the Mac Mini. The height of a computer made with Nano ITX would be roughly 1/2 inch taller than the current Mac Mini, owing to our inability to use custom parts.

    6. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    7. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you have geeks. they'll install netbsd for the helluva it on a 10 year old sparc. they'll solder celeron cpus to make them dual capable. they'll break apart a decstation and install it in a atx case...

      all because "they can"

      then you have fucktards like the parent, though not representative of your average apple elitist, he represents a non-trivial portion of them.

      even while the mini attracts droves of people who will use it for various uses, him and his kind will complain loudly because the expanding mac base isn't putting the new mac mini on a corian counter top and worshipping it over a $7 cappucino.

    8. Re:But what is the point? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      One is not going to have any luck doing this, though, because there is no PC with a small enough form factor. Not a Mini ITX, not even a Nano ITX.

      You could put a cluster of these in a Mac Mini. Not exactly a PC, but it's an Intel board.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:But what is the point? by SoulMaster · · Score: 1

      Wrong! It is just as dumb as putting a floppy on a PC!

      Ahh HA!

    10. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know what. I agree. This is dumb.

      I want to buy a Mac Mini because it is small and even though it is not the fastest computer on the face of the earth, it is fine for word processing and emailing (heck, I've done word processing on a 25 Mhz Amiga, how bad can it actually be).

      But if you want to have a server on an ATX box, you're better off purchasing a 200 bucks Wal*Mart Linux Box and use the rest of the money for drives and/or memory. Heck you can buy a barebones Athlon for about 300 bucks and put Linux/BSD and do the same thing.

      If the only purpose is to be a server, you do not need fancy graphics, you do not need fancy sound (or any sound) and as a matter of fact, you do not need that much CPU anyway. (My home file server is on a 100 mhz pentium).

      Now... in his defense, it does provides an insight on the things you may be able to do with a Mac Mini, and being that this has been one of the very few mod's to come, God Knows that'll lurk on the horizon.

      This might not be the "creme de la creme" of mod's, but at least it demonstrate how hackable these computers can be.

      Me

    11. Re:But what is the point? by Sabathius · · Score: 0


      One reviewer of the PC-within-a-Mac-Mini-case said that it was like the PC was wearing the Mac Mini skin like Leatherface from Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
      I think this mod is like taking the queen of England and dressing her up like a two dollar whore.

    12. Re:But what is the point? by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "This is just as dumb as putting a PC in a mac mini case."

      or a fat chick in a ferreri....

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    13. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've ever done both - adminstered a personal server on Linux and on a Mac - then you'd know how easy it is on the Mac and how much command line bullshit you have to go through with Linux even with KDE/Gnome installed.

      I have far better things to remember than all the arguments to rpm or where everything lives in the Linux file structure. I don't want to mess with the server I just want it to work. When it requires attention that should be as little attention as possible.

    14. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then why does the macmini look like a toaster?

    15. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing like transfering 500Gigs of data through 100BT. lots of waiting fun.

    16. Re:But what is the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what. I agree. This is dumb.

      No way man! This guy is a pioneer! I plan to replace my 4.4kWatt CPU and 4.9kWatt I/O in my Vax9000 with one of these bad boys! Hell the Mac mini can take double the RAM that my beloved 9000 can take! And what's more, the electricity that I will save in one week, will pay for the top spec Mac mini outright!

      Vax9000

  2. Yeah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [Using a Kip voice from Napoleon Dynamite]

    That's what I'm talkin' about.

  3. Why? by Neil+Blender · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why would you do this?

    1. Re:Why? by jumpingfred · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is a cool slashot article because they are extending it beyond what is was intended to be. If it was intended to be expandable then expanding it is not so interesting.

    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because 2.5" drives are slooowww..., more costly, and provide less storage size.

    3. Re:Why? by Flavio · · Score: 1

      Maybe from a technical standpoint, but to me it looks like yet another worthless mod done by a fool with no sense of aesthetics.

    4. Re:Why? by useosx · · Score: 1

      I believe this is the second article. Unless you count the one about putting a PC inside a Mac mini case (sans optical drive), then it's the 3rd. Massive.

      The first one was just how to open the case and install RAM on your own. Something a large number of skilled cost-conscious Mac mini buyers probably want to know.

    5. Re:Why? by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've lost count of the number of "mod your Mac Mini like this" stories that have been posted here in the last month. Most of them deal with increasing the power or expandibility. I find this kind of ironic, considering that the Mac Mini's market seems to be mostly people to which power and expandibility are definitely not primary considerations in a computer buying decision.

      The simple fact of the matter is that the Mac mini is the first incarnation of hardware that will run OS X at a decent speed with quartz accelerated graphics at this price level, and many geeks like myself have been waiting for something like this to be within our price range. Now that it is affordable, and being the geeks that we are, we won't be satisfied until we are able to buy a $499 Mac mini, overclock it until it's running as fast as a dual PowerMac G5, and turn an entry-level system into the god-box we all would like to have... heheh....

      Does that explain it for ya?

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    6. Re:Why? by danpritts · · Score: 1

      The mac mini's market is *mostly* people to which power & expandability don't matter.

      However, it's also cheapskates like me who wouldn't buy a $1300 iMac, but don't want a slow-ass 4200rpm disk drive or to pay $200 for a 40M 7200rpm laptop drive.

      that said i haven't seen the mod, and a firewire disk would fix my primary problem.

    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      basically he fixed the mac mini with the lid off and the optical drive and hdd removed (but with the base still intact) into a micro-atx PC case using tiewraps then built an adaptor which plugged into the HDD port and allowed him to connect a standard IDE cable to normal desktop drives

      yes its big compared to a standard minimac but it also has a huge HDD and a proper desktop optical drive and its a lot cheaper than most macs that ship with that stuff

      also afaict restoring the minimac would be a matter of clipping the cable ties disconnecting the adaptor and rebuilding it nothing major.

      last i tried the coral cache of it worked not sure if it still does.

    8. Re:Why? by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      How can you say that? Perhaps he's a person of great taste. Perhaps he filled the original iMac case full of plaster of paris to make it heavy and lobbed it through the display window of the Apple Store.

      That's the kind of thing a true artist would do. Asthetic as all get-out.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    9. Re:Why? by groomed · · Score: 1

      It's just a computer. I don't see what's so interesting about connecting a hard drive to a computer. Open box, connect hard drive, close box. You can't even get the connectors wrong nowadays. Even a monkey could do it. Well, I suppose if a monkey actually did it that would be kind of cool.

    10. Re:Why? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      Too many qualifiers.

      This is the first $499 Mac ever.

    11. Re:Why? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      So apparently that means that Ravenspear, the grandparent poster, can't count higher than two. From that we can deduce that he has no legs and no fingers. I guess when he wants to count to three he has someone unzip his pants.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    12. Re:Why? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      also afaict restoring the minimac would be a matter of clipping the cable ties disconnecting the adaptor and rebuilding it nothing major.

      This is a good point. The modder did nothing irreversible. If he needs warranty service, he can easily reassemble the mini and send it back.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  4. All together now: by __aailob1448 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Worst. Idea. Ever.

    The whole point of the mac mini is it's small form factor, transplanting it into another case to upgrade the HD is simply absurd.

    1. Re:All together now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not true.

      The other "whole point" of the Mac mini is that it's low cost. This adds a much faster hard drive which is probably the slowest component in the Mini, and Hard Drives are cheap.

      I'm seriously thinking about updating the HD of my mini...

    2. Re:All together now: by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      I thought the idea was also a cheap mac?
      Or are macs really all about looks over functionality?

    3. Re:All together now: by GlassHeart · · Score: 1

      Form factor is a function. A 5 kg "portable MP3 player" the size of a briefcase, for example, wouldn't really hit the target market.

    4. Re:All together now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then upgrade it with a 5400 rpm 2.5" drive. 5400 rpm is already very close to the saturation bandwidth of the ATA66 bus. A large 7200 drive won't be any faster.

    5. Re:All together now: by mejesster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't you dare tell me what the "whole point" of any computer is. I'll tell the computer what to do, thank you very much. I don't care what apple thinks it should do.

      --
      MacroHard - Boning you in a big way! (TM)
    6. Re:All together now: by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      Yes, form factor is a function. Not the only function.

      So it doesn't completely ruin a mac mini to put it in a different case with a different hard drive. You give up one feature for another while keeping the remaind of the features.

    7. Re:All together now: by nbert · · Score: 1

      Well, the point actually is, that you get a ppc (running OSX) for a relatively low price. But compared to similar (x86) solutions it's rather expensive. So you either like the architecure or you like OSX or you simply love its design (there is nothing wrong about that), but don't tell me that the mini is low cost. It's just a niche Aplle hasn't covered before.

    8. Re:All together now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm like the other poster that replied... the whole point of a computer is to do what I want it to do. I don't live by the "Handbook of How to Live" written by Apple.

      That's why I've always thought Apple's "think outside the box" was always kind of hilarious... because Mac users rarely think differently from each other.

    9. Re:All together now: by nbert · · Score: 1

      In your example it makes a difference because it is a portable device. But does it make a difference if your desktop computer is 5 kg or e.g. 15? Since you don't move it too often it doesn't really matter at all.

      The Mini beats them all in terms of size however, which might make it interesting for people having not much of it to spare.

    10. Re:All together now: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except you forgot 5400 RPM 2.5" drives are more expensive than 5400 RPM 3.5" drives of the same size.

    11. Re:All together now: by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Yes. We should all push the computing companies to come out with Altair sized computers. Here's a thought, do we not move them because we don't want to, or because they are too cumbersome to move?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    12. Re:All together now: by aztektum · · Score: 1

      If you decide to and submit the HOWTO to /. make sure it's not running on the mini as well, unlike this one.:D

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    13. Re:All together now: by nbert · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me that a desktop computer won't be moved because of it's weight. Even my 80+ years grandmother could move an average computer to the other side of the room without hassle (if she would ever want to move a computer).

    14. Re:All together now: by damiam · · Score: 1

      For a close enough price and much, much less work, you can buy an external HD.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    15. Re:All together now: by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      Sure, and then you've got little boxes with cables draped all over the tabletop.

      By doing this, he frees up the 2.5" hard drive, which is a good size to upgrade an older laptop, and gets the performance upgrade. And some of us find Apple case designs stupid looking.

      And he can sell the original case on eBay to somebody who doesn't find said cases stupid looking.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    16. Re:All together now: by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apple decides beforehand.

      They're 'leaders' and 'innovators' and don't you dare presume you know better than them regarding your needs.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    17. Re:All together now: by skweegee · · Score: 1

      Not sure how many, but I know some of the 1.25ghz models shipped with 40GB drives are 5400 drives.

      Model: ST940110A

      That is what mine has and it's a 40GB 5200 rpm Seagate. As far as I know none of the 1.42ghz models shipped with 80GB 5200rpm drives only the 1.25ghz with 40GB drives.

    18. Re:All together now: by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      But does it make a difference if your desktop computer is 5 kg or e.g. 15? Since you don't move it too often it doesn't really matter at all.

      Allow me to quote Apple's own marketing material:

      Believe it or not, all this technology weighs just 2.9 pounds. Imagine... a desktop computer you can easily move from your study to the kitchen on a whim. Mac mini won't break your back when you want to shuffle things around.
      which should make it pretty clear that the Mac Mini is intended to be moved around.

      By the way, you completely missed CastrTroy's point, which is: do the size and weight of a desktop mask our actual need to move it around (in which case Apple might help redefine the home computer), or do we really not need to move it around, hence it was allowed to become big and heavy (in which case Apple is just wasting time cramming it into such a small space)? CastrTroy didn't say that computers are too heavy to move.

    19. Re:All together now: by timmy+the+large · · Score: 1

      The biggest hassle isn't the weight. Its all the wires you have to connect. Unless I'm wrong that is still an issue with the mini, and also moving the display.

    20. Re:All together now: by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Informative

      On the contrary, the closest equivalent I could find was a Cappuchino PC. And by the time you's upped it's processor MHz, disk memory GB to iMac mini spec, the cost was $909. You won't find any PC of comparable spec to the mini for lower cost than the mini. Either you'll compromise on the size, or you'll have to build it yourself.

    21. Re:All together now: by BasilBrush · · Score: 1
      The whole point was to make a server, not a desktop (let alone a "tabletop"). Stacking an external disk drive on top of the mini isn't generally a problem for a server.

      And if you find Apple case designs stupid looking, and prefer PC cases, then I suggest you need a visit to the optician. Apple cases are stunningly well designed.

    22. Re:All together now: by AdmiralWeirdbeard · · Score: 1

      This post seems indicative of a whole bunch I've been reading regarding DIY modding lately. There seem to be the type of folks with the time and inclination to do something interesting, though not so interesting that the rest of us are going to do it... and then there seems to be the sort of people who assume that if it doesnt make perfect sense to mod in that fashion than it was a stupid idea. wasnt a stupid idea, just not what you would choose to spend your time and resources on, we get the picture

      --
      Come read my stupid blagablog. Rants and Giggles
    23. Re:All together now: by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I think you've come up with a new event for the slashdot grandma computer olympics.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    24. Re:All together now: by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Some of us plan things out so they don't have to move things 40000000 times. My desk is far heavier than my computer to move. SFF is a niche market; it's useful for people on the move a lot, especially coupled with the hibernate feature, but other than that, it's not really vital.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    25. Re:All together now: by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a sign of how far slashdot has gone downhill. You get a bunch of comments like, "The whole point of the mini is it's small size/stylish case/OS X/whatever."

      Wrong. The whole point, if there ever is such a thing as a whole point, is that it's a computer, and can be adapted to the users needs. Sometimes these adaptations are clunky (like the techTV guy that was unable to stuff a PC into a mini case), sometimes they might appear clunky, but are functional (as in the mod under discussion), and sometimes they are elegant. Sometimes they're just fun.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    26. Re:All together now: by nathanh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen. Anybody who questions why this guy did this needs to get a fucking clue. Slashdot is being overrun by bleating consumers, simply waiting to be told what to buy and how to use it. Anyone who does not get a kick out of this mod should go watch TVSN rather than ruining Slashdot for the rest of us.

    27. Re:All together now: by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      No, but I often take my GameCube over to a friends place. Because it's light, and small. I wouldn't even try this with an X-Box. It should be noted that I do not have a car. So travelling on the bus should be taken into consideration. If I had a computer the size of a mac mini, I might, on occassion take it to a friends house. Many people I know brought high powered laptops to LAN parties because carrying around their full size computer was pain. Even with a car.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    28. Re:All together now: by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      No, the whole point of the Mac Mini is that it's CHEAP.

      In fact the direct quote from the Apple site is "The most affordable Mac ever"

      Why not put it into a larger case and be able to use other types of hard drive etc? If you don't like the idea, don't do it to yours.

    29. Re:All together now: by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I blame the Mac zealots.

      Oh wait. I am a Mac zealot. Let me rephrase that.

      I blame the Mac zealots with higher user IDs than mine. =)

      (Note: I'm fully aware that some of the negative comments are along the lines of: "What an idiot! He could have done this with PC hardware and not wasted all that money on a Mac mini.)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    30. Re:All together now: by TobyWong · · Score: 1

      That's why they call it MacCheap right?

      dumbass.

      --
      - Toby
    31. Re:All together now: by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      I move computers around for a living..... ANYTHING big is a hassle. I would rather cary 5 minis at a time than one of these dell monstrosities I do lug around.

      Why?

      Cause with the dell Im carrying one computer, maybe two. With the mac mini Im carrying 5. It is a major hassle rearanging one computer and hooking up all the cables etc, which all cut into my time, having the thing weigh 7 or 8 pounds doesnt make it better.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    32. Re:All together now: by reassor · · Score: 1
      Sure, and then you've got little boxes with cables draped all over the tabletop.

      If you bought extra long cables,you could arange it,out of reach.So,i dont see the Problem. I have two external Disks with long cables and i wont trip over it.

    33. Re:All together now: by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
      I don't live by the "Handbook of How to Live" written by Apple.

      Maybe you need to read it again then. RTFM, dude! You think Steve Jobs writes these manuals for his health?

    34. Re:All together now: by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Please report to a licensed Apple Re-education Camp immediately. It seems your Reality Distortion Field needs re-adjustment.

    35. Re:All together now: by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      And if you find Apple case designs stupid looking, and prefer PC cases, then I suggest you need a visit to the optician. Apple cases are stunningly well designed.

      Where did I say that? All PC cases are neutral/ugly in appearance. Except for some, which look stupid. Apple has made a number of the latter.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    36. Re:All together now: by skinfitz · · Score: 1

      Do I even need to explain this?

      "MacCheap", apart from sounding absolutely fucking stupid (don't get a job in marketing for anyone we like), would infer that it was crap due to the meaning of the word 'cheap' in america. Do you honestly think that Apple set out to make the smallest Mac in the world? Steve Jobs himself said on stage last year that they keep getting asked to make a cheap basic Mac, and now they do. Sure it's also the smallest Mac they have ever made, but for starters that will reduce the cost of materials.

      Couple this with the $500 price tag and the whole point is that it's CHEAP.

      Double dumbass on you.

      Dumbass.

    37. Re:All together now: by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 1

      You need to learn how to "think different". Report to your nearest Apple store for reprogramming.

    38. Re:All together now: by nbert · · Score: 1

      so does the size and weight of a desktop computer really make a difference? IMO it's not a point at all as long as we are comparing recent desktop or workstation computers. Marketing always finds ways to augment certain features, but that isn't really a proof of its superiority.

      I'm sorry, but I can move my DIY piece of crap x86 just as fast as any Mini.

    39. Re:All together now: by GlassHeart · · Score: 1
      I can move my DIY piece of crap x86 just as fast as any Mini.

      Consumer habits are horribly hard to predict. The reason I quoted Apple marketing in my response is to explain that they at least intended the Mini to be moved around. Whether or not users actually will do is a different question.

      Also, the question is not going to be settled by a race between a Mac Mini user and you moving a computer 50 yards. The question is, given your current tendency (or lack thereof) to move your bigger PC around, would a small form factor computer make you move things around more casually or not. The speed at which you move the two computers may be the same; the inertia that must be overcome to make you decide to move may be different.

  5. no replies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    and already nuked.

    Anybody have the article?

    (And seriously, if nobody ever R's T Fing A, why do servers go down faster than a hooker for a benjamin?)

    1. Re:no replies... by graffix_jones · · Score: 1

      Dang... you have expensive hookers where you live. Ours go down for a Lincoln, and sometimes a Washington if they're low on crack.

      At least thats' what my friends tell me...

    2. Re:no replies... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... they're not expensive, The Benjamin is there to make sure they go down quick.

      Yeesh, consult yourt handy hooker/speed/cost unit conversion chart!

    3. Re:no replies... by graffix_jones · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, a hooker took off with my chart when she stole my pants. I'll make sure to get another one.

      Oh, and my friend was wearing my pants... not me. Honest.

    4. Re:no replies... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Coralised. I think I got it in time.

    5. Re:no replies... by sgaehl · · Score: 1

      Maybe its nuked because they used the wrong URL the URL they were given was http://www.appletalk.com.au/articles/miniserver/ the decided to use a different URL the the same content that used the SQL server. The SQL server cant handle it but the URL we gave them is still up.

    6. Re:no replies... by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      It's like playboy. They only look at the pictures ;)

    7. Re:no replies... by hunterx11 · · Score: 1
      why do servers go down faster than a hooker for a benjamin?

      When I first read that, I overlooked the second "a." I thought to myself, "Benjamin Franklin may have been the mack daddy, but this seems to be a rather odd comparison."

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    8. Re:no replies... by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      His comment is self incriminating. He couldn't have known if the server was up or down if he wasn't trying to rtfa. I cry heresy!!!!!

    9. Re:no replies... by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      "Benjamin Franklin may have been the mack daddy..."
      Yes, but TJ loves the mochaccina.

      (read America: The Book if that means nothing to you)
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  6. Obligatory by Arghdee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looks like they used it to host the page..

    Up in flames already.

    1. Re:Obligatory by nanodude · · Score: 1

      Coral: http://www.appletalk.com.au.nyud.net:8090/articles /index.php?article=4433

      Hoepfully he's running linux on that mini mac (mini mac sounds soo much cooler than mac mini)

  7. Or... by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...without ripping your Mac mini apart and sticking it in a PC enclosure, you could use any capacity 3.5" disk you wished in conjunction with Mac mini by using any 3.5" drive enclosure with FireWire (and/or USB 2.0), including some sure-to-be-released FireWire/USB 2.0 enclosures that will mimic Mac mini's appearance, and be designed to sit underneath or near a Mac mini and still be aesthetically pleasing. Perhaps some vendor like El Gato will even make a FireWire PVR/tuner solution WITH an integrated 3.5" drive bay, in the same type of case as Mac mini.

    (Preemptive response: Yes, FireWire 400 is more than fast enough for this application. Yes, even for a media server. Yes, even for a PVR. Yes, I know USB 2.0 doesn't support booting. If you want booting, use FireWire. Yes, I know Apple says you shouldn't stack anything on top of Mac mini. That's why I said Mac mini would stack on top of it. Further, it's very likely NOT because of heat, but because the AirPort and Bluetooth antennas are directly in the top of the case, and instead of making a bunch of convoluted requirements about when and if it's ok to stack something on it, they just said no stacking. But, again, moot, because you could stack the mini itself on top of such a hypothetical enclosure or device. Or, set them side by side.)

    The Mac mini really is almost a perfect media center box:

    Acceptable processor and video card
    DVI, VGA, S-video, and Composite video out
    1/8" stereo audio out, or digital audio via FireWire with one of several adapters
    FireWire and USB 2.0
    10/100 ethernet and modem
    Optional 802.11g and Bluetooth
    CD-RW/DVD or optional CD-RW/DVD+/-RW
    Remote control via Apple Remote Desktop or VNC (included in the free ARD Client 2.1)
    Very small, very elegant, and very quiet operation

    All that's missing is a tuner and a PVR application, and that's a nightmare to wade into, what with what's necessary to tune satellite services, and the infancy of CableCard.

    1. Re:Or... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 3, Insightful

      well, there actually ARE reasons for wanting to do this...

      having a small formfactor box is pointless if it's surrounded by external devices. If you pop it into a single enclosure with all the extra drives and whatnot encased in a single unit, it's a lot easier to manage and you don't have to worry about toppling. It probably also will increase the lives of the devices since they'll be moved less (moved all at the same time rather than in small increments).

      I took apart a G4 and popped it into an ATX case so I could have 2 optical drives and room for more internal HDs. Also, I liked the idea of having a window and UV cathode tubes illuminating the internals...

      A small form-factor mini-itx case is still a small form-factor case. The project (althought I didn't RTFA, it's fried) doesn't say to put the mac mini's logic board into a full ATX tower, does it?

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ...including some sure-to-be-released FireWire/USB 2.0 enclosures that will mimic Mac mini's appearance, and be designed to sit underneath or near a Mac mini and still be aesthetically pleasing.

      Don't tease me!

    3. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A small form-factor mini-itx case is still a small form-factor case.

      An average miniATX case is about 5x14x16 = 1120 c.i.
      A mini case is 6x6x2.5 = 90 c.i.

      A factor of TWELVE

    4. Re:Or... by coopaq · · Score: 1
      DVI, VGA, S-video, and Composite video out

      I bought a Mac Mini. Where is the S-Video port?

    5. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All that's missing is a tuner and a PVR application,

      And there's no way to currently add one either... which is why it won't be a perfect media center...

    6. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, I fucking love you trolls. Sure, you're a racist, and I hope you get hacked to bits by Will Smith on live TV for it, but I'd shake your hand first!

    7. Re:Or... by sadida_333 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The S-Video is in the $19 cable that you plug in to the DVI port.
      http://store.apple.com/1-800-MY-APPLE/WebObjects/A ppleStore?productLearnMore=M9267G/A

    8. Re:Or... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      You need a DVI to S-Video adapter. GP didn't claim that it has "an S-video port", but it does do S-Video.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    9. Re:Or... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps some vendor like El Gato will even make a FireWire PVR/tuner solution WITH an integrated 3.5" drive bay, in the same type of case as Mac mini.

      Actually, there are already some very good articles up on how to make your Mac mini into an HDTV PVR. Basically, you need an HDTV tuner with a firewire output. This can be had for about $5 a month from your cable company, or you can buy one for OTA (over the air) HDTV broadcasts here.

      The only thing that prevents the Mac mini from direct HDTV playback is that the processor speed is too slow (requires a G5 for that). If you want to add the final missing piece to your Mac mini enabled HDTV PVR setup, simply add a Roku Photobridge HD digital media player and you are in business.

      I should note that the Mac mini can playback SD programming with no problem; it's only the HD programming that requires a little extra oomph... The cool thing about this is that currently, no Windows PC can touch the direct firewire recording capabilities of the Mac. DVHStool was originally written as a proof of concept to show how easy it was to manipulate digital video with the Mac, but it also shows how far behind Windows has become on Firewire. Let's not forget people, Apple invented IEEE1394, or Firewire, as it is more commonly known.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    10. Re:Or... by 3waygeek · · Score: 4, Informative

      Download the free FireWire SDK from Apple, and you get a virtual DVHS application that makes your Mac's 1394 interface look like a digital VHS. Combine this with a HD tuner that has FireWire out, like the Motorola 6200 series used by Comcast and others, or the Samsung T165 ATSC tuner, and you're most of the way to a PVR.

    11. Re:Or... by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 1

      I bought a Mac Mini. Where is the S-Video port?

      You can get the Apple DVI-to-Video adaptor for USD 19.00 at store.apple.com.

    12. Re:Or... by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      having a small formfactor box is pointless if it's surrounded by external devices. If you pop it into a single enclosure with all the extra drives and whatnot encased in a single unit, it's a lot easier to manage and you don't have to worry about toppling. It probably also will increase the lives of the devices since they'll be moved less (moved all at the same time rather than in small increments).


      What? I never heard these complaints when Sun was using the lunchbox form factor for its IPX and IPC cases, etc. The best part is that, if you want, you can stick just a drive like an external DVD burner on your desk, if you need access to it, and tuck the rest away. It also means less wear and tear inside the CPU portion of the case, if people upgrade drives all externally. Oh, and since the sections are each isolated, they probably don't need noisy fans to push heat out. Just little quiet ones. And with overall operating temperatures cooler to start with, parts tend to last longer, anyway. Sometimes I think Sun made the lunchboxes a little tricky to close just to keep people from opening them so much. :)
    13. Re:or... by Anarchitect_in_oz · · Score: 1

      Better still convince a friend too hack their mini as discribed.
      Steal the case from their mini.
      turn that into firewire enclosure.
      Have the same thing in pretty mini style.

      --
      "Call us when the New age is old enough to drink" Beck
    14. Re:Or... by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      Another $19 cable. They sure like to sell 'extras' for that system, and at healthy markups.

      I went to the Apple Store website and discovered that the Mac Mini doesn't come with a keyboard, mouse, or monitor. I added keyboard, mouse, and monitor, and suddently it wasn't a $500 computer any more. It suddenly was a LOT more expensive.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    15. Re:or... by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      Or two firewire cases. Or five, or seventeen of them.

      Cords draped all over the place. Fun!!

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    16. Re:Or... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Here's a simpler (and cheaper if you already have a video camera) way to create a PVR for Mac.

      Link

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    17. Re:Or... by NatasRevol · · Score: 1
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    18. Re:Or... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, I liked the idea of having a window and UV cathode tubes illuminating the internals...

      Yeah, because a light and windows makes the computer internals sooo much better.

    19. Re:Or... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Having a SFF box is JUST FINE if it is ON TOP OF external devices. Let's review: Apple says not to put anything on top of it. If you don't need anything external then groovy, it's tiny. If you do, then as long as they stack, the computer only gets taller, taking up only the necessary amount of vertical space. In other words, it's basically ideal.

      On the other hand, there are still reasons to do this. And, buying all those stackable devices is probably expensive, which defeats the purpose of having a cheap computer, although I still think it was designed first to sucker people in to buying Apples (first time's cheap!) and second to sell accessories.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:Or... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      The only thing that prevents the Mac mini from direct HDTV playback is that the processor speed is too slow (requires a G5 for that).

      I would just like to say... BAH!

      MPlayer is damn fast, and runs native on OS X, even with Altivec support. Since I can playback HDTV material on my 1.66GHz AMD XP system, I believe the 1.42GHz version shouldn't have any problem playing back full-res HDTV in realtime, and perhaps on the slower version with some framedropping.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    21. Re:Or... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The admins in my shop disparage Netras, V100's and V120's on a regular basis.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    22. Re:Or... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      That's ridiculous. The mini is a fully strapped computer out of the box. If you want to add accessories, they're available. How is this "sucker[ing] people"?

      "Buying all those stackable boxes is probably expensive..." Whatever. Buying well designed products is always more expensive than buying poorly designed products. I'm glad to have the option. If it weren't for Apple, there would be zero well-designed personal computers.

      (I've seen some very nicely designed servers, although the aesthetics tend to be poor to miserable)

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    23. Re:Or... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Because the mini doesn't need ANY fan at all. The mini cools by convection it it's tiny plastic shell, it'll be even cooler in a PC case.

      If you place stuff correctly in a PC case you can even get the heated air from the CPU to draw in cool air over the hard drive.

      Because the mini runs OS X and Linux, the Opteron runs Windows and Linux. OS X is an awesome no-hassle server platform.

      Because 64-bit doesn't mean ANYTHING when you're a file server with under 4GB of RAM. I'd rather NOT have a 64-bit computer right now, I'm quite happy with 32 until there's a compelling reason to move up. File servers have no reason whatsoever to go 64-bit unless 64-bit parts becomes cheaper through volume than 32-bit.

      I'm considering doing this because my 300MHz G3 tower is getting a bit long in the tooth, and I'm doing more and more with it these days. Stepping up to a 1.25GHz G4 would be quite nice, but I won't do it unless I can put two hard drives on at once.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    24. Re:Or... by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, all of the external drive bays I've ever purchased aren't mac mini friendly...

      I've got a dual-bay firewire enclosure that's only about 4" wide, a CD burner in an enclosure that's got a convex top (the mini wouldn't sit flat on top of it), and 2 of those LaCie Pocket drives... All of those peripherals insist on either sitting on top of the mini (although they are a good margin deeper than the mini), or next to it, using precious desk space...

      Although, one could always get one of those spiffy mini accessories that allow stacking things on top of it.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    25. Re:Or... by karakal · · Score: 1

      Then go get a Dell! But don't complain afterwards!

    26. Re:Or... by imroy · · Score: 1

      No, the mini does have a single fan. From what I've read, it's temperature activated. It only comes on when needed by the CPU or GPU.

      As for the use of a 64-bit CPU in a fileserver, you're only partially right. Having lots of ram in a fileserver can help with caching/buffering of data from disk. But 64 bits isn't just useful for addressing large amounts of ram. While 4G of ram is still very large for most home users, files of 2G or more are not that uncommon. DVD's and raw audio/video can easily produce multi-gigabyte files. For 32-bit cpu's to work on large files, various kludges and work-arounds have to be used. I know that Linux didn't support "large files" (>2G) on 32-bit machines until only a few years ago (2.4? 2.3?), because Linus had rejected earlier schemes as inefficient or messy. Before then, such files could only be made and accessed on 64-bit platforms. And hard disks (let alone RAID arrays[sic]) are getting so large that the sectors can't be addressed with 32-bit integers (4G * 512 = 2T). So 64-bit fileservers are needed (or at least beneficial) in some cases.

    27. Re:Or... by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      I would just like to say... BAH!

      MPlayer is damn fast, and runs native on OS X, even with Altivec support. Since I can playback HDTV material on my 1.66GHz AMD XP system, I believe the 1.42GHz version shouldn't have any problem playing back full-res HDTV in realtime, and perhaps on the slower version with some framedropping.


      To be more precise, Apple hasn't opened up their API for hardware based MPEG playback, so third party applications are forced to use CPU power to decode the video. According to El Gato, it requires a PowerMac G5 to decode HDTV without dropping frames. If Apple wants to open up their APIs then playback on a Mac mini would become a non-issue, as the graphics card would be able to handle the heavy lifting.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    28. Re:Or... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      Having lots of ram in a fileserver can help with caching/buffering of data from disk.

      yes, but returns diminish after you exceed your 80/20 'working set' which at any given moment is usually under 2GB.

      files of 2G or more are not that uncommon. DVD's and raw audio/video can easily produce multi-gigabyte files. For 32-bit cpu's to work on large files, various kludges and work-arounds have to be used.

      Not really, 32-bit CPUs easily handle file I/O operations in the multi-gigabyte range, it's 64-bit precision calculations that 64-bit CPUs benefit from. Even if there is some overhead from dealing with huge files, the VAST majority of a file server's performance issues stem from disk and network subsystem performance. My file server regularly handles files over 4GB (DV files) and the CPU level rarely exceeds 10%, and that's on a 350MHz machine.

      Before then, such files could only be made and accessed on 64-bit platforms.

      IIRC, the file handling for even the 64-bit flavors of Linux were 32-bit before the mid 2.4 series. Both platforms got this at the same time.

      And hard disks (let alone RAID arrays[sic]) are getting so large that the sectors can't be addressed with 32-bit integers (4G * 512 = 2T).

      Sorry, that's not making any sense to me. ATA subsystems have been using 48-bit LBA addresses for a while now, and SCSI uses similarly huge numbers. You assume that each byte of the drive needs to be addressed, but this is not true, each SECTOR needs to be addressed, so you don't have to multiply by 512B/sector. Drives speak only in sectors to their controllers, it's the software component of the filesystem driver that decides what the contents of the sector will be.

      Like I said, 64-bit file servers don't really have any advantage over 32-bit ones today, unless you need more than 2GB RAM. They WILL become popular before their time though, because of misconceptions like yours and the falling price of 64-bit computing in the marketplace.

      I'd also like to note that I'm not against 64-bit computing, I'd rather move up before we hit the limits of today's hardware. But I think we have to be educated about what we can alreay do with 32-bit computers. I estimate that I'll be peachy-keen with my own 32-bit machines for about three more years. I'm suggesting 64-bit file servers at work now, actually, because I know that AMD's Opterons are overall better, more efficient, and cheaper than Intel's server chips; not to mention that it'll be the best way to finally get rid of our Dell servers (pray for me).

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    29. Re:Or... by imroy · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've done my research. As found on Christopher Brownes' pages, a page about filesystems:

      ``I need to have files bigger than 2GB. What's the big problem?''
      • ext2fs in linux-2.2 supports files bigger than 2GB (up to 1TB for filesystems with sufficiently big blocks (the limit comes from the triple-indirect blocks)).
      • On Linux-2.0, there is no support for more than 2GB files.
      • On Linux-2.2, files bigger than 2GB are supported but only on 64 bit architectures (alpha, Sparc64, ...). So on Intel, you're out of luck.

      So no, both 32-bit and 64-bit platforms did not get large file support at the same time. It was originally developed on 64-bit platforms where it was simplest, and later a suitable mechanism was added to the 32-bit platforms that Linus was happy with. Sometime in the 2.3 development kernels I suppose. I have trouble remembering all these little historical trivia anymore.

      And I never said that a system needs to address every byte. That's why I put "4G * 512 = 2T" in brackets. Didn't you notice the number 512? What I was saying was that as drive/array sizes grow, they will nolonger be (easily) addressable by 32-bit systems. Mind you, I'm sure there's lots of RAID arrays out there larger than 2T on 32-bit systems. Hell, LaCie has a portable 1T FireWire enclosure. So they obviously already have the capability and have had for some time. My bad.

      My point was that it's simply easier and more efficient to pass those offsets around in single registers and do calculations in single operations. As to whether the small increase in speed/efficiency is worth the cost is another matter. But Athlon-64's are pretty cheap. And Opterons or G5's aren't much more expensive either.

      Good luck getting rid of Dell at your workplace :)

    30. Re:Or... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for Apple, there might have been room for a different underdog and we might still have Amiga or Be or something, though admittedly Amiga self-destructed. In modern times, some of the SGI Workstations (like O2s) could qualify as desktop computers if the basis for comparison is price, but that's just an aside, I'm not really using it as a counterargument. And, suggesting that Apple is the only one who might have implemented nice cases as a competitive feature is a bogus argument, because there have been PC manufacturers who did the same thing, and who were making forward-looking cases (smooth, black, and with pretty lights, for example) when Apple was still making only beige or grey boxes.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    31. Re:Or... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "because there have been PC manufacturers who did the same thing,"

      Really? Where?

      "(smooth, black, and with pretty lights, for example) "

      I'd love to see examples of what you're talking about. Contrast them with the 20th Anniversary Mac that was released ten years ago.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    32. Re:Or... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      See; Zeos PCs. They were black and they looked slick. The 20th anniversary macintosh looks like a reject from bose's design department and cost two grand and up depending on when you bought it. Even in 1997 (eight years ago, btw) that was a little steep for a 250MHz 603ev with a puny 12.1" 800x600 display. The PC makers, however, did not go as far down the candy coating road as apple, because consumers wanted cheap power more than they wanted transparent and/or translucent cases. Keep in mind that Apple lost the battle for desktop dominance because they spent too much time jerking off with pretty cases and not enough time/money improving their machines and especially their operating system. Actually, that last part is pretty funny, because they spent enough time and money to develop three or four operating systems, and in fact did partially develop a couple before Jobs came back, they bought NeXT, and we ended up with the bloatfest that is OSX instead of BeOS.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Or... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      I'm glad we're finding truth here, though I'd like to point out one more thing, I have a 'last laugh' personality. :-)

      My point was that it's simply easier and more efficient to pass those offsets around in single registers and do calculations in single operations.

      True, but how much LESS efficient is the other overhead of the OS when running full 64-bit? If large disk access incurs 5% less overhead, but the OS uses 20% more memory to run itself and apps, are we really gaining anything? (numbers shamelessly pulled from my arse)

      I think the innovation (bus speed boosts, hypertransport, PCI-express, etc) will be happening on the 64-bit platforms now, so the reason to 'go 64' will be the better features and forward compatability, not the bitness of the system itself.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    34. Re:Or... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      RIGHT! I forgot. Apple is a beleaguered also-ran that isn't leading the computer industry or anything.

      My bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    35. Re:Or... by idsofmarch · · Score: 1

      But then I have to use Windows Media Center.

      --
      Anyone who whines about being modded down should be.
    36. Re:Or... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does my computer feel so much snappier now that I've put a window in it?

    37. Re:Or... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Apple has made a dramatic comeback in spite of the amazing bloat of OSX, due to the fact that they finally have a credible (if, again, bloated) operating system and fast processors. Until the G4 macs, Apple has been consistently underpowered.

      Incidentally, why is OSX so slow? NeXTStep was really quite usably fast on machines with 68030 processors. OSX is a horrible dog on a G3, decent on a G4, and only speedy on a G5 - and not even there all the time. What gives?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    38. Re:Or... by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      I'm typing this on a Dell. Running NetBSD.

      Not complaining either. I got this P3 machine in a large lot of computers at an auction, so it cost me about 80 cents.

      No monitor or keyboard for that price, though.

      The big box of keyboards was five bucks.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    39. Re:Or... by evilviper · · Score: 1
      To be more precise, Apple hasn't opened up their API for hardware based MPEG playback, so third party applications are forced to use CPU power to decode the video.

      Yes, I realize this, and I'm willing to bet the use of MPlayer, compiled with optimized CFLAGS, should be able to playback HDTV material at the very least, on the 1.42GHz system, without hardware acceleration.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    40. Re:Or... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Do you think Jean Louis Gassee could have presided over Apple's comeback? Would he have had the vision to re-invent the company the way Jobs has?

      If they had bought Be, they wouldn't have survived the dot com bubble. Say what you will about Jobs...he knows what he's doing.

      Forget OSX vs. Be. The real competition was between Jobs and Gassee.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  8. The Internal External HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's wrong with having a long IDE and power cable outside the case and connecting that to an internal HDD? I know a friend who uses an IDE extender to do this.

    1. Re:The Internal External HDD by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      The longer the IDE cable the more crosstalk and errors you get, and, concequently, the slower the drive gets (untill you start getting corruption or the drive simply doesn't work).

      If you make sure the cable is short enough, you can do this. Just make sure you protect it (thin insulation for an out-of-case wire - IDE cables are fragile) and keep the dust bunnies outside of your case.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:The Internal External HDD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? It has 1394 does it not? Plenty of external 1394 drives around.

    3. Re:The Internal External HDD by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Supposedly, SATA cables can be up to a meter in length without problems, though I don't think the Mini has SATA.

  9. Coral Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Coral Cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      merci!

  10. many ask why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the answer is ofcourse so you can use the macminicase for your nano-itx mobo :P

  11. easier solution by Alkivar · · Score: 0

    airport and some network attached storage...

    why void the warrenty on a minimac when you can simply buy an airport and use network attached storage? this is worse than a pointless hack, its a bad one.

    1. Re:easier solution by moonbender · · Score: 1

      Because network attached storage over airport is even slower than the internal 4200-rpm hard disk. Granted, your idea works if the problem is a lack of HD space, and not its access speed.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    2. Re:easier solution by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Uh. Well if you wanted to do this to increase the speed of the drive in your Mac Mini - wireless isn't goint to help you. You would be getting at max 54Mbps (megabits per second) to the NAS unit (in reality less) where as with a decent 7200RPM HD you are looking at more like 50MBps (megaBYTES per second).

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:easier solution by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

      Using network drives with any of the network interfaces available on minis will be significantly slower than a local drive. If the point is to have a faster drive, this will defeat the purpose.

      If the point is simply to have a bigger drive, then network drives are an option. However, on wireless it will be pretty slow even if you don't care how slow it is. Better to go with ethernet.

      --
      I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  12. Except... by mtrisk · · Score: 1

    It completely ruins the point of having a Mac mini. Frickin' ugly as hell too. I mean, if you want a RAID this badly, leave the beautiful Mac alone and go along with some sort of network storage/fileserver solution. Easier to set-up, candy for the eyes, and a lot less hackish.

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:Except... by thundercatslair · · Score: 0

      It doesn't ruin it at all, from what I can gather the point of the mini mac is to sell cheap computers and get more people to start to use OS X and possibly buy other products from apple. The hard drive is slow and installing a faster one does not ruin it, even if you have to take it out of the case and put it in a new one.

    2. Re:Except... by tetromino · · Score: 1

      It completely ruins the point of having a Mac mini. Frickin' ugly as hell too.

      I don't buy computers for the aesthetics. If I wanted aesthetics, I would buy a painting and hang it on my wall. The Mac Mini is the first apple that I actually find affordable, except the case sucks (sucks functionally - I don't care if it's beautifuL): there is too little airflow (so no overclocking), and not enough space for a decent hard drive. Fortunately, a $50 PC case can remedy the situation.

    3. Re:Except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly troll who hasn't read the article!

      The point of it is that it goes in the closet - it's NAS, not a Mac - it just happens to run OS X.

    4. Re:Except... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, like every other fucking Mac zealot on here, are redundant. Shut up and go back to licking Jobs' balls.

  13. Doh by HawksNest · · Score: 0

    How could someone be so heartless as to butcher a mac like this?

  14. an idea by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 5, Funny

    Combine this with this articlehttp://apple.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05 /01/30/2213249&tid=222&tid=174 from a few days ago, and you would have a miniMac in a Mini-ITX case, and a Mini-ITX in a Mini Mac case. It's a plot we've seen before. http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TOS/e pisode/68818.html

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    1. Re:an idea by deadgoon42 · · Score: 1

      Great Start Trek reference. I have all "Funny" stuff modded down, but this really was funny. Thanks!

      --

      Smeghead every day of the week.
    2. Re:an idea by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Also, in the end of the Futurama episode The Farnsworth Parabox there is a box that contains the universe where the box itself is.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  15. Why? by ravenspear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've lost count of the number of "mod your Mac Mini like this" stories that have been posted here in the last month. Most of them deal with increasing the power or expandibility. I find this kind of ironic, considering that the Mac Mini's market seems to be mostly people to which power and expandibility are definitely not primary considerations in a computer buying decision.

  16. Truth in advertising. by dameron · · Score: 5, Funny

    It seems their server is running tpc via AppleTalk. Long live PhoneNet!

    -dameron

  17. No thanks by snowdropper · · Score: 1

    Instant slashdotting!

    So although I can't RTFA, I will say that part of the reason I would buy a mac mini would be the case design and form factor. Having to rip out its guts just for a 3.5" drive, no thanks. Interesting nontetheless.

  18. or... by justforaday · · Score: 1, Redundant

    or you could just slap a drive in a firewire case and use that instead...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  19. Mirror by AtOMiCNebula · · Score: 1

    Let's use the coral cache, since the server already seems to be working hard enough. Loads really fast... I'm surprised slashdot doesn't run all the links in articles through coral servers.

    1. Re:Mirror by suckmysav · · Score: 1

      "'m surprised slashdot doesn't run all the links in articles through coral servers"

      Ummm, because Coral Cache doesn't work perhaps?

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
    2. Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah. Last time a coral cache link got frontpaged, coral went down. Same for mirrordot.

      I suggest slashdot mirrors the article locally, they seem to have the bandwidth.

  20. Not really by useosx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Small form factor is nice, but if you want to throw it in your basement as a server, it's main benefits are:

    1) It's cheap
    2) Draws about 65 watts, so your electric bill will be lower than using an old G3 tower or something

    So, in that case, if you want to use it as a server, a nice 400 GB 3.5" IDE drive would be great. Who cares about the case if it's in your basement.

    Now, if they can only figure out how to get Gigabit Ethernet in there...

    1. Re:Not really by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      2) Draws about 65 watts(*), so your electric bill will be lower than using an old G3 tower or something

      So, in that case, if you want to use it as a server, a nice 400 GB 3.5" IDE drive would be great. Who cares about the case if it's in your basement.

      The site is slashdotted, so I couldn't RTFA, but does he power the HD from the Mac or did he need more power?

      A noisy power supply would turn that around quickly.

      (*) 65 watts?? A Mac Mini takes only 65 watts?? Wow. Now it's the green alternative as well. New and Improved! =)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Not really by mt+v2.7 · · Score: 1

      If you want a server.. why on earth are you using a mac mini?

    3. Re:Not really by Jack+Auf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to use it as a server then why not simply leave it in the original case, plug in a firewire drive, and throw it in the basement (or under the fridge, or in a closet, or....)

      Take the money that you would have spent on a case and spend it on a FW enclosure and a disk and come out ahead.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - BF
    4. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Even Newegg offers EPIA boards now, and the cheapest was $55 the last time I looked. Take one of those, add memory, a hard-drive and power supply, and your server is ready to roll; case optional ;)

    5. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the mini is very power-efficient, and in the course of a year this might provide surprising savings over using an old Athlon or P4 as a server.

      An extra 300W supply isn't burning 300W all the time. Sure there are inefficiencies but to a large extent powering two drives off a 300W supply costs about the same as powering two drives off a 40W supply or a 600W supply - 12V@1A + 5V@700mA * 2.

    6. Re:Not really by m00j · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that he is using the ATX PSU to power the Hard drive as well! So he has two power supplies running for it.

    7. Re:Not really by useosx · · Score: 1

      Ah, then I'm humbled. Couldn't read the article, slashdotted.

    8. Re:Not really by m00j · · Score: 1

      I found that Coral Cache works:
      Here

    9. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the point of a 3.5" hd was also to get a cheap and fast HD. Wouldn't FW cut down the HD speed to the level of a cheap 2.5" HD?

    10. Re:Not really by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why don't you buy an old PIII ($100 or less - that's what I call cheap, not $499). Throw Linux on it (free), and you'll have yourself a nice server with a lot more capabilities and expandability than the Mac Mini. Adding Gigabit ethernet, bigger harddrives, SCSI, or whatever will be trivial if you get the right box. All at the cost of a bit more power usage (PIII's can be pretty efficient though). So what if it doesn't run OSX or has an "ugly" beige case? It's a server! Throw it in the basement and forget about it.

    11. Re:Not really by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Can you RAID between an internal IDE and a firewire drive? Even if you can that would be a kind of a weird setup.
      He had 2 250GB drives in a RAID 1 configuration. One of his stated goals was to use it for backing up his main computer via rsync.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    12. Re:Not really by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really. Firewire controllers are getting really good maximum real-world transfer speed these days (around 40 MBps, which is 80% of theoretical maximum). Video editing will saturate it quickly, but real-time audio won't, nor will any task you'd pick a Mac Mini for (rather than a G5).

      Many people want these things for DVR/HTPC use. Encode MPEG2 and stream to disk? Yep. It'll do that. The G4 can encode MPEG2 in real-time with a properly written encoder (since the 866MHz days). And the output isn't going to demand a lot of Firewire bus bandwidth.

      And don't forget that you also get the reliability of a 3.5" HD (2.5" ones feel flimsy IMHO).

    13. Re:Not really by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      No, but you can raid two firewire drives via preinstalled software.

      You should keep your boot drive separate from your data drive anyway.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    14. Re:Not really by NatasRevol · · Score: 1, Informative

      A lot more capabilities?

      They're both unix. What can you do in Linux that you can't do in OS X? Is hand editing a config file easier than clicking a check box? Not if you haven't seent the config file in 6 months...

      And have you ever used iLife. Best piece of integrated software, ever. iMovie+iTunes>iDVD=semi professional DVD with high quality video, music, transitions, text and themes. For free if you buy a Mac mini.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    15. Re:Not really by SCVirus · · Score: 1

      Ever heard the bash quote about the guy who lost the machine....

    16. Re:Not really by toddestan · · Score: 1

      We are talking servers here, and a PIII with an ATX case is going to be a lot more expandable than a Mac Mini. A 3.5" drive? Easy. Another 3.5" drive? Easy. Tape Backup? Easy. Gigabit ethernet? Easy. Another gigabit ethernet adaptor? Easy. Try adding that to a Mac Mini.

      Oh, and I don't know about you, but I generally don't watch movies, edit videos, or listen to music on my servers either.

    17. Re:Not really by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the gigabit, it could all be done via Firewire. For the uses of a Mac mini, this would be more than fast enough.

      Not everyone can have dedicated servers. Some people/companies need to use servers as desktops as well. And they work damn good for that purpose. My desktop server at home hosts half a dozen websites, several dbs, is an email server and yet I can do online banking, edit videos and have my kid playing games.

      To each, their own.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    18. Re:Not really by timmy+the+large · · Score: 1
      Companies using servers for desktops are just asking for trouble. Nothing screws up a system like a user.

      I agree for home use. We use our home server to backup my wife's animation projects and as a music server/video player in the living room.

      By the way it cost about $500 for everything, and has 2 200gig IDE drives, a cd burner and a gig of memory. So if you really want a cheaper, more flexible server I think intel/athlon are the way to go. I do really envy that 65 watt power supply though,

    19. Re:Not really by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I saw this article the other day, before it was posted here. Yes, he does use a second PS to power the HDs. Although he speculates about the possibility to power the HDs off of the mini, he concludes that it would be more effort than he's willing to expend.

      So he's got two power cords coming out the back of his server.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    20. Re:Not really by franklinrh · · Score: 1

      Basement?

      We all know this is going to be in the middle of your living room.

      Reference: Look at about any picture submitted by geeks to /. and not only do you see every computer they've ever owned in their living room, but most of their possessions as well. Shoes, cot to sleep on, clean clothes pile, dirty clothes pile, soda cans, crumbs, beer bottles, video game controllers, and the gratuitous cat or dog.

      --

      --
      Can anyone spare 120 chars? I'm saving mine to buy a link at Fark.
  21. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Why would someone deface a poor defenseless Mac Mini like this?
    Because the hard drive is slow (4200 RPM), and this is cheap.
  22. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oblig. they must be running teh server on it haha !!

  23. Must connect ... floppy disk drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How else am I going to get the pictures from my Sony Mavica photocamera into iPhoto?

  24. putting a mini inside an Apple // by BobWeiner · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I suppose it was only a matter of time before someone decided to mod their mini into a standard PC carcass. What's next? How about putting the Mini inside a vintage Apple II box?

    Since the mini came out, I've been hoping I can stuff it inside an old Apple IIGS (or, even better - a //e), just for giggles.
    Anyone up to the challenge?

    --
    The PC Weenies: 11 Years of Online Tech 'Too
    1. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by michaeldot · · Score: 1

      Since the mini came out, I've been hoping I can stuff it inside an old Apple IIGS (or, even better - a //e), just for giggles. Anyone up to the challenge?

      I'm game, but can we make it an LC II?

      Ever since reading the rumor sites started reporting a cheap Mac, I've been thinking "pizza box" so I'd like to get an old Macintosh LC (or LC II or LC III) and spread out the guts of a Mini inside it.

    2. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by Beltway+Prophet · · Score: 1

      I have an empty (mostly) LC III case if anyone wants it...

    3. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by Uart · · Score: 1

      Actually, thinking about this... I wouldn't mind pissing the world off and stuffing a Mini inside of my CRT iMac... that would be a pretty interesting way to get a processor upgrade, don't you think?

      But could you even connect the CRT to the Mini? Without getting electrocuted and dead?

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    4. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrmmm... I'll admit I don't know the precise dimensions of the mini (I know, I know, I can just look it up on Apple's site), but I'm having difficulty seeing how to get it to fit into a LC/LC II/LC III/Quadra 605 case. Mainly, I'm having difficulty seeing how the optical drive would fit, since the two drive bays are 3 1/2" and have the case's only cooling fan & the speaker in between them.

      (Well, you might be able to move the fan and speaker around... However, I'd personally suggest the later revision cases as a source, as the original LC had a funky fan & speaker assembly that only worked with that particular motherboard. Of course, you'd probably end up using a different fan anyways, but it's not like it would cost all that much more for a 13 year case vs. a 15 year one.)

    5. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by Shack95 · · Score: 1

      How about a Mac Mini inside an original SE case with a 6inch LCD ??? Mmmmmmmm

    6. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd have to be very careful, but yeah, probably. I've done repairs on my iMac that involved taking the entire thing apart and getting much closer to the CRT than I would have liked. (God-damn flyback transformer.)

      The bigger problem would be getting power to the CRT, as it used the same PSU as the iMac's motherboard, and I somehow doubt that the mini has a PSU powerful enough to power both the monitor and the actual computer.

      (It would also require a hell of a lot of soldering.)

    7. Re:putting a mini inside an Apple // by benchbri · · Score: 1

      A 9 inch POS VGA display lines up perfectly with the mounting holes for the CRT in any old "Classic" Mac. I know this from experience. How about a mac mini inside a Mac Plus, Classic, SE, or Classic II?

  25. Finally! by Shnizzzle · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wanted a Mac but they were so damn ugly. If only mac minis had been designed to look like e-machines. Today truly is a great day.

    1. Re:Finally! by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      *chuckle* that's pretty good sarcasm for plain text.

    2. Re:Finally! by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      I actually think the G3 blue and white, the G4 powermacs, the original iMac, the eMac and the swivel LCD iMac are all pretty ugly. I especially have the cheap looking plastic on those first gen iMacs and G3, G4s. Ick.
      The PowerMac G5 is pretty nice looking and quiet too (some G4s are very loud). The iMac G5 is ok, and the Mac mini is nice enough.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
  26. Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL reason by michaeldot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sacrilege aside, putting a Mac Mini in a PC case has one key definite advantage:

    It would let you sneak a Mac into workplaces whose IT Manager(s) have a "no Macs ever, over my dead body" policy.

    Just think: you could have a larger case containing a regular PC, but with the guts of a Mac Mini placed in the space around empty drive/PSU bays.

    Hide a KVM switch somewhere and bingo... Windows/Linux when the PHB/IT Manager is around, Mac OS X when you want to get some work done!

  27. Article Text by Fazer · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mac mini Maxi
    By: aeberbach
    Feb 8 2005

    The Mac mini Maxi - how I attached extra storage to make a mini server.

    This article involves doing things to your Mac mini which may well destroy it. You should not try this unless you are prepared to lose your entire Mac mini investment, and you should definitely not try it if you do not have an appreciation for the dangers of power tools, electricity and the jagged edges found inside PC cases!

    When I woke up in Australia the morning after the MWSF keynote speech had come and gone, the Apple store timed out for 30 minutes or so before I was able to get my order in. It was a long wait until the 28th when the mini finally shipped, then the 31st before it was delivered. I wasted no time in getting the cover off and upgrading the memory, and was immediately impressed by this little machine.

    However 2.5" notebook hard drives are a serious limitation. For one they are limited to 100GB - I have more than that just in FLAC-encoded CDs, and I have half that much just in RAW-format images. The mini would make a great little server - quiet, cheap to buy new, low power too - if only big drives could be attached. Knowing that the mini uses 2.5" IDE drives I decided it was just a matter of making the physical connector right, and started this project about a week before I actually got the mini, luckily I guessed right. The speed increase that comes with using 7200 rpm drives is not to be sneezed at either (the largest 2.5" 7200 rpm drive I know of is just 60GB).

    There have been more than enough photo essays about unpacking the mini and disassembling it in various levels of detail. I'm going to jump right in and show you the part that mattered to me, the daughter board that connects the optical and hard drives to the mainboard. You won't see this view of it unless you disconnect both drives.

    On the top is the optical drive connector. This is a standard connector but it's surface mount and difficult to buy - not something you can easily solder up at home. Below that is a 2mm-pitch 44-way connector, mating with a standard 2.5" drive - aha! Since I had adapters that let me use these drives in a desktop PC, I figured the reverse would be possible. And also I guessed that the optical and hard drives are simply master and slave devices on the IDE bus. A simple adapter would let me connect two normal IDE drives, be they optical or whatever. But while the adapter to connect 2.5" drives to a desktop machine is easily available, an adapter to connect 3.5" drives to a machine expecting 2.5" drives is not. Obviously 3.5" drives won't physically fit in laptops and there are different power requirements too so I could believe that such a thing wasn't available.

    Taking the easily available adapter and just reversing the sexes of the connectors might seem like an easy way to do this but then the positions of the pins are swapped - pin 1 would become pin 2, etc. - a sure way to damage the machine or the drive or both. Each pin must be mapped correctly to the same-numbered pin on the other side of the adapter.

    Where to put this server? Clearly 3.5" drives weren't going to fit in the mini's case. I settled on the Aopen H420B micro ATX case. If you're a switcher then Aopen might be a familiar name in cases. This is a fairly typical example of a PC case - steel sides, plastic front, clunky, covered in styling details that don't really help its looks. However it is roomy, comes with a power supply and as PC cases go is fairly compact. Another view shows that it is ready to house two 5.25" devices and a maximum of four 3.5" devices, although if you ask me stacking drives together in such a confined space is asking for heat-related trouble.

    That this case is not as stylish as the mini isn't a big deal - its intended use is as a server, and it will be out of sight. I intend using it to store MP3s, images and video, and will stream music to various places around the house. It will share drives and be a convenient first backup location for work

    1. Re:Article Text by Notoriouz · · Score: 1

      "That this case is not as stylish as the mini isn't a big deal - its intended use is as a server, and it will be out of sight. I intend using it to store MP3s, images and video, and will stream music to various places around the house. It will share drives and be a convenient first backup location for work going on in my main machine."

      You bought a mini to do that? I'm doing that with my ancient g3 400 imac running osx with 512 mb ram. Itunes is awesome for streaming your mp3 collection btw

  28. Not to mention by kilodelta · · Score: 0

    That the mini-mac has a Firewire port. Lots of HD's out there for relatively short money that attach to Firewire ports.

  29. While I"m at it... by demonic-halo · · Score: 1

    While I'm at it.

    I'll place the Mini into a Cube. =)

    1. Re:While I"m at it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I put a Mac mini in my goatse.cx

  30. err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    if part of the allure is its looks, then what's dumb about putting a pc in its good looking case?

    or are you using reverse psychology and you actually think this article ISN'T dumb?

    1. Re:err... by NeoOokami · · Score: 1

      Well if he's referring the article that appeared a few days ago the transplant job was stupid. "Yay! Look at me I put an x86 machine in a Mac mini case. Granted I couldn't fit in an optical drive and I had to saw off half the heat sync so you'll wanna add another fan.... BUT! YAY! Look at ME!"

    2. Re:err... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SINK. Heat SINK. Jesus fuck. SINK. Get it right.

    3. Re:err... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I'd love a good looking PC case. Never found one. I've found some that don't look hideous, but I've never seen one that made me say "Wow! That's a nice looking case!"

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:err... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1
      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    5. Re:err... by isecore · · Score: 1
      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
    6. Re:err... by CPM+User · · Score: 1

      Try Hush

    7. Re:err... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I take it back. Let me further qualify. A well-designed case that I don't have to mortgage my home to purchase.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    8. Re:err... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Internals are nice. Externals are...a featureless metal box.

      Aesthetics are important to me.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    9. Re:err... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes: Hide all the important stuff behind a big aluminum door I'll have to deal with all the time.

      Not good design.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:err... by bynary · · Score: 1

      Problem: "We need an aesthetically pleasing PC case."

      Solution: "Hey, just slap some brushed metal on the outside of one of those ugly-ass cases we have in the warehouse. Oh, and make sure it's a pain in the ass to access the I/O ports on the front and the optical drives."

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    11. Re:err... by bynary · · Score: 1

      I believe you're looking for something like this. Here's a price.

      --
      http://www.bynarystudio.com
    12. Re:err... by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      I like the way they look. I guess I just never got into the rounded, plastic look of Apple's products.

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    13. Re:err... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Uh, with the exception of the iBook, all of Apple's products are made of aluminum.

      But whatever.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:err... by isecore · · Score: 1

      Seriously, how often do you use the optical drives? Do you sit swapping discs day in and day out? I know that I use mine about once a month.

      And the front ports are not hidden behind the door.

      IMHO drives are about the ugliest thing about modern computers, and I like how the Mac Mini toned it down to a simple discrete slot. I'd happily hide my optical/whatever drives behind a door.

      --
      I enjoy large posteriors and I cannot prevaricate.
  31. WHY? WHY? WHY? by miTcixelsyD · · Score: 1

    The appeal with a Mac Mini is it's size/form factor. WHY is this being done? I'm hoping the title of the article means it's been "maximized" by its size and not it's capabilities. This is just stupid.

    1. Re:WHY? WHY? WHY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAICT, the main reasons for wanting to do it was because he wanted more disk space for FLAC files, but it'd make more sense to keep those kinds of files in an external drive anyway so that he can move them around. It reads like he just wanted to hack instead of the easy route of getting a firewire enclosure for 3.5" drives.

    2. Re:WHY? WHY? WHY? by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      The appeal to you is the size/form factor.

      I wouldn't mind having an OS X machine, but not at the cost of the larger systems, and not with the limitations of the Mini.

      This is one of the coolest kinds of hardware hacking, because it involves totally undoing the limitations that the system vendor places arbitrarily on a 'low end' model. It's like overclocking in that regard.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    3. Re:WHY? WHY? WHY? by Halo5 · · Score: 1

      This machine is not as limited as you think. Just about any expansion you would want is available via USB and firewire.

      Memory is upgradeable to 1GB.

      I took the 160GB drive out of my Linux box and bought a USB2 enclosure from Walmart to upgrade my Mm. I can't think of anything available on a Windows/Linux box that I can't get for this baby!

      --
      665: The mark on the forehead of Satan's slightly less evil brother, Stan.
    4. Re:WHY? WHY? WHY? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Just about any expansion you would want [for the Mac mini] is available via USB and firewire.

      What about access to a fast fixed disk that's not limited by the 40 MByte/s effective throughput of IEEE 1394? What about a second display? What about affordable video input ($50 for a low-end PC PCI video input adapter vs. $150 for a USB 2 video input adapter)?

    5. Re:WHY? WHY? WHY? by RedBear · · Score: 1
      The appeal with a Mac Mini is it's size/form factor. WHY is this being done? I'm hoping the title of the article means it's been "maximized" by its size and not it's capabilities. This is just stupid.

      May I please have a differing opinion, oh please, kind sir?

      - Maybe what appeals to you isn't necessarily what appeals to someone else.
      - Maybe the Mac mini is not just a small/cute computer, but also a halfway decent computer at a good price, with the only problem being a slow hard drive bottlenecking its performance.
      - Maybe I want to use some nice Apple hardware to make a server without paying Apple $3000+ for an XServe or $2000 for a G5 tower.
      - Maybe I just want to use the pretty case as a bookend or a footstool and throw the internal junk in the trash. As long as I've paid my $499, what right do you have to question it?
      - Maybe it's a piece of economical hardware with capabilities outside of what the Apple designers intended.
      - Maybe we're geeks who like to take things apart and make them do interesting things they weren't necessarily designed to do, for the fun of it.
      - Maybe we have a perfect right to do whatever we want with a piece of hardware we own, without being subject to you or Apple's interpretation of what we're supposed to do with it.

      If you feel stupid now, don't fret. It means you've learned something.

      "A mind once expanded can never return to it's original dimension."

      Oliver Wendall Holmes
  32. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by kalidasa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or you could just carry in the Mac mini hidden inside your briefcase and hide it under your desk, without the fake case.

  33. Just wait for the accessory. by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Really. Some relatively talented industrial artist working for Dr Bott/LaCie/etc will design a fixed firewire drive bay that is exactly the same size as the mini, and may offer some other functionality like Compact Flash/SD/etc reader. Fixed 120GB, or a hotswap with cheap trays.

    Good accessories come to those who wait.

    1. Re:Just wait for the accessory. by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      'whoah, honey. look, the computer appears to have multipled overnight. Now there are a whole bunch of little cases, all draped together with cords.'

      'talented industrial artist'?

      The vision that comes up is some shop teacher who knows how to weld together metal scrap to make sculptures.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
  34. Firwire Drives. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'nuff said.

  35. how lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you all know how the mac is about it s stylish looks, but even still besides that.... what a waste! why not use firewire external drives?

  36. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    Now you're thinking! But that might mean cabling it up every day, or if leaving it under the desk overnight, the risk of the cleaners pushing it out and it being discovered. And IT Managers are a suspicious lot, just look at the film Gattaca.

  37. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't even have a floppy drive. How should I backup my work if I have no floppy-drive?

    This sucks.

    How can anzone work with such a piece of shit.

  38. The point is using the Mini as a server by tetromino · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I imagine that with the low price, low power usage, and ppc architecture (not many binary sploits for Linux on ppc...) many people would want to use these things as small servers. The problem is that the Mac Mini hard drive sucks ass - it's slow, only 40G, and the small form factor means upgrades are expensive. Perhaps the most important part of a server is a good hard drive.

    By putting the Mini into a PC case, you get the room to add a large fast hard drive, and the air flow needed to cool it.

    1. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by javiercero · · Score: 2, Informative

      1 word: Firewire... jeez.

    2. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by tetromino · · Score: 1

      1 word: Firewire... jeez.

      2 words: price and latency.
      Oh, and the benefits of keeping all your OS (as opposed to just your files) on a fast drive.

    3. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by t0ny747 · · Score: 0

      it's slow, only 40G, I know this is sorta off topic but I remeber having two 47MB hard drives, I thought that was a lot. Also the fast 386 running at 33mhz!!!

      --
      Taco?
    4. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Price: $24 . You can hardly get a PC case for less than that.

      Latency: if you're using this as a file server, then you're sending all your data out a 100mb connection. The firewire latency is the least of your bottlenecks.

    5. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      The problem is that the Mac Mini hard drive sucks ass - it's slow, only 40G, and the small form factor means upgrades are expensive.

      This is what Firewire exists for. The size of the Mac mini is meaningless -- just plug in one or more Firewire-based external hard drives, and you're all set. And if you have more than one, Mac OS X allows you to do software RAID with them right out of the box.

      Yaz.

    6. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by sensate_mass · · Score: 5, Informative

      On my mini 1.42, I bench about 50% faster with a 7200 rpm 8mb 250 gig Firewire over the stock 4200 rpm 80 gig 2.5". The speedup is very obvious in use. Oh, and I boot from it.

      What is this latency of which you speak?

      --
      --- Submission is feudal.
    7. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      A big part of a server is also that the drives are rated for high usage. Desktop drives, even the nice 3.5" 7200rpm ones, are generally not rated for constant usage.

      Personal serving would be fine. Serving a small workgroup would cause drive failures as you approach the MTBF point with the drive in use well beyond its specced limit.

    8. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by timmi · · Score: 1

      quite the contrary, because what actually causes the vast majority of the "Wear and tear" that leads to failures is caused by startup cycles.

      I have used "off the shelf" IDE hard drives in PC's that run 24/7 and never had a problem. I also have protected all my PC's with APC Batteries.

    9. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well if you _like_ your server's hard drives connected by external cables that can be pulled out, or you like having to move two or three boxes when you move the server, or you don't ever want to use the mini's firewire port for anything else (and you've never heard of problems when daisy-chaining firewire devices)... then yeah.

    10. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I can't figure out why people so looks and form factor will accept external devices at all. Who wants a system glommed together with lots of separate parts and cabling? That honkin' external PSU on the 'mini is bad enough already.

    11. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the article! This point is addressed, and Maxline Plus II drives were chosen for just this reason.

    12. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Firewire enclosures are cheap.

      Latency? Do you know anything at all about firewire? The performance limits are a lot higher than any hard drive.

    13. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by tetromino · · Score: 4, Informative

      What is this latency of which you speak?

      All benchmarks I've read show that firewire has much worse latency than IDE. A quick google revealed that average IO response time is 17.8ms for firewire and 0.12ms for IDE for a particular Maxtor drie (note: the 0.12ms figure is almost certainly because they were hitting data in the hd cache; otherwise it should have been more like 5 ms for the ide case). I am guessing that if you are streaming data, firewire is not too bad, but random access on a firewire drive will not give you good performance.

      I recommend you to run a benchmark after connecting your drive directly to your machine's IDE cable.

    14. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Servers shouldn't be moving on a regular basis, and great care should be taken whether or not they are attached to external devices. Also, what other FW devices would you want to connect directly to a server that wouldn't go as well through a FW hub?

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    15. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you'd booted from a 3.5" 7200rpm drive on the IDE bus you'd know exactly where the latency is. You're getting confused by the fact that firewire is beating something that is extremely slow. That firewire would be beaten in turn hasn't crossed your mind? Or does your firewire drive make your mac as fast as it could possibly be?

    16. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not new. For years, external drives have been connected to servers by cables that are easy to pull out. It used to be easy to *trip* over them...

    17. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      Yes, but once you buy a firewire enclosure, the size argument of the mini starts to go out the window. Might as well buy a bit bigger case and have better latency for your hard drive.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    18. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by MinotaurUK · · Score: 1

      I wonder how difficult it would be to replace the 2.5" drive inside the Mini itself? I mean, there are no shortage of good 7200rpm 2.5" drives on the market these days which'd fit the bill quite well I'd have thought.

    19. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'm just dying to entrust all my music, movies and photos to the cheapest firewire interface I can buy.

      Truly you have the soul of a PC user - please don't ever switch! In the Mac world there is far too much emphasis on making things work, even if that isn't always the cheapest way.

    20. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by TheHonestTruth · · Score: 4, Informative
      You're getting confused by the fact that firewire is beating something that is extremely slow.

      He's not confused, it's his point. Internal drive, 4200 RPM == slow and sucky. External Firewire drive, 7200 RPM == spins fast enough to make up for the connection latency. Therefore, an external 7200 RPM firewire drive is faster than a 4200 IDE. I'll confirm the boot up speed difference. My iBook boots much faster from my LaCie FW drive than from its internal drive. Random access and normal usage though? I can't make any claims in that regard.

      -truth

      --

      I had a steady B+ in my AI class until I failed the Turing test...

    21. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      That's two words! They've just been smushed together for market-speak. I mean marketspeak. Fuckit.

    22. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you link to the complete file of standard answers and refer us to the section, less copy/paste that way.

    23. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Latency? Do you know anything at all about firewire? The performance limits are a lot higher than any hard drive.

      Don't forget, that latency is additive. By using the term "limits", you seem to be comparing firewire side-by-side with IDE. When in fact, firewire will add latency to the unavoidable IDE latency. You don't choose one or the other, you either choose to use IDE without firewire, or you choose with use IDE with the addition of firewire.

      No matter how high performance of any given firewire spec will be, it could never have zero latency. All digital devices exhibit propagation delays and the greater the complexity, the greater the delays.

      I personally would prefer the Mac mini with an external firewire drive since the much higher transfer rates would make up for the little extra latency and I imagine give a better overall performance for typical stuff. I won't be running a heavily used database or web server from my Mac mini. If I did run it as a web server, I would likely be running NetBSD on it with htdocs on a RAM disk (my web pages don't tend to go into the gigabytes anyway). I'd probably also replace the 2.5" HDD with a 2GB CF card too.

    24. Re:The point is using the Mini as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have used "off the shelf" IDE hard drives in PC's that run 24/7 and never had a problem.

      I hope you are not trying to claim that run of the mill IDE is as durable as real server disks (SCSI).

      There have been IDE drives which have had clear statements to the effect that a 100% duty cycle is not supported and would void the warrantee.

      Drive manufacturers actually put claims on drives that they design specifically for 24/7 use. Some even make 2.5" SCSI units with that claim for blade usage.

      So at one extreme, you have units that clearly cannot be used with a 100% duty cycle (and have a high reported failure rate to go with it) and at the other extreme you have units that are designed for 24/7 operation and don't have reports of high numbers of failures.

      I'll stick to server disks for server tasks. BTW, you can buy 2.5" IDE drives which are intended for 24/7 use. I'm know Seagate make some and others probably do to.

  39. Something useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about getting that apple to light-up? Stopping stuffing it into another case, or stuffing a PC into the Mini's case.

  40. What actually might work.. by LittleGuernica · · Score: 0

    What actually might work..is if one must put a bigger harddrive in it, say 400GB, because you have a specific use for the mini in mind that requires this amount of storage, than you could consider tossing out the optical drive and use the extra space so that a 3,5" might fit. (cooling problems aside)(power supply problems aside) If anyone is going to try this please send me the pictures before your site gets /.-ed or you attacht iPod shuffles in RAID for that extra bit of storage..

  41. the google cache... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://64.233.167.104/search?q=cache:BF5g6HUsNXwJ: www.appletalk.com.au/articles/index.php%3Farticle% 3D4433+&hl=en

  42. Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by ikewillis · · Score: 4, Informative

    For $150 you can add a 7200RPM 2.5" Hitachi TravelStar drive. Surprisingly, these drives run cooler than many 5400RPM 2.5" drives while providing the performance of a typical 7200RPM desktop drive. Best of all, you won't have to hack up your Mini (thereby violating the warranty) to install it.

    1. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by danpritts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      they won't provide the same transfer rate as a 3.5" 7200rpm drive - the linear speed half an inch further away from the spindle will be higher, and thus the transfer rate higher, in the 3.5" unit.

    2. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the highest capacity available is 60GB. The highest capacity in 2.5" at any speed is 100GB. Too bad if you have more data than that, you have to buy a G5 (or pay too much for a used G4) if you don't want a built-in screen.

    3. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    4. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by merreborn · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can pick up a 200 gig 7200 rpm 3.5" drive for at least $30 less than your 60 gig 2.5". We're talking $0.75/gig vs. $2.50/gig.

    5. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One problem though, you won't get the raid that he wanted.

    6. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you including the cost of the Mini-ITX box in your comparison?

    7. Re:Why not... add a 7200RPM 2.5" drive? by timeOday · · Score: 1
      providing the performance of a typical 7200RPM desktop drive.
      How do you figure? The benchmarks I'm looking at show normal desktop hard drives have 50% higher sustained read/write speeds! Let's not confuse "RPM" with "performance."
  43. Well by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    2 of the 4 major model families of G4 would have interested you:

    Power Mac G4 (QuickSilver) and Power Mac G4 (Mirrored Drive Door) systems both had room for 2 5.25" optical drives, PLUS 4 internal 3.5" drive bays. In the case of the MDD, there were two ATA/100 busses and one ATA/66 bus (for optical drives).

    Additionally, how many accessories are you talking about adding to Mac mini? A drive and a tuner? And if someone makes a Mac mini-like enclosure for this - which is very likely, given the history of Mac and iPod peripheral makers - then it's even less desirable to cram it into an ugly PC case.

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quicksilver doesn't have native support for > 128GB drives. MDD is still too expensive to devote to server duty, unfortunately.

    2. Re:Well by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Sure. But those models are no longer available. I know the last generation PowerMac G4 was available at the Apple Store - but I can't find it anymore.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    3. Re:Well by interiot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if they simply added the digital audio out, it would be perfect for a client/server-style PVR, where the Mac Mini sits near your TV, and all the HDTV data comes in to it over Ethernet. Please Apple, please add digital audio as a build-to-order option, and I swear I'll buy one. I really don't want to have some other box that's almost the size of the Mac Mini just for digital audio.

    4. Re:Well by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      I have a first gen g4 (originally 450mhz) with a 800mhz upgrade. so it doesn't have all the coolness of the models you described...

      The case that the machine came with only had a zip and CD external bay and 2 internal spots for HDs (I believe I could probably attach a 3rd internal 3.5" drive, too, but I didn't have any decently sized scsi drives), so I popped the innards into an ATX case and a CD burner in addition to the slotload DVD and zip drive. There just wasn't room for all this madness in the original case.

      I've also got a DVR-108 drive in an external firewire enclosure on top with a dual-bay HD firewire enclosure on top of that... Those are only there so I can attach them to my powerbook if need be (only has a 1x superdrive in it and a 60gb HD)

      I actually ruined my Yosemite G3's case trying to mod the zip bay to fit a second optical drive, and had to buy a replacement bay off ebay.

      The accessories I'm talking about are basically extra and/or oversize (3.5") drives.

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
  44. Firewire Drive by racecarj · · Score: 1

    It occurs to me that instead of putting a nice little computer in a big ugly case, it would be much easier and probably wouldn't cost much more (over the cost of an internal 3.5" drive) to just get an external firewire hard drive. The LaCie ones are metal and would go along nicely, and they're 7200rpm too.

  45. Challenge?! What challenge?! by Beltway+Prophet · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Mac Mini is small enough to fit, whole and unblemished, into any old Apple model (except maybe the Cube, and I'm sure the guts would fit into that once the case was off).

    Fit a Mac Mini into a Timex-Sinclair, and then I'll be impressed. =)

    PS. I wonder how you'd type command-T on the membrane keyboard.

    1. Re:Challenge?! What challenge?! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Mac mini will fit into the empty space at the bottom of a Mac Cube. The mini is _truly_ tiny.

    2. Re:Challenge?! What challenge?! by hawk · · Score: 1

      never miind the old macs. How about an IMSAI? Oh, wait, no dispaly or keyboard. OK, a VT-100. Should easily fit in the dispaly unit, though the heat might be a bit much . . .

    3. Re:Challenge?! What challenge?! by reassor · · Score: 1

      If it will fit in a Cube Case,then look at here: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=4601&item=5163090849&rd=1 Who will be the next on Slashdot "i put the Mini in the Cube" with Pictures? If the Link is broken,remove the space between "cate" and "gory"

    4. Re:Challenge?! What challenge?! by lrucker · · Score: 1
      Fit a Mac Mini into a Timex-Sinclair, and then I'll be impressed. =)

      Yeah. I once tried to see how many Timex-Sinclairs would fit into an Apple ][ - don't remember exactly, but 4-5 seems about right.

  46. oh no by geekoid · · Score: 1

    now you have done it..time to dig out the Apple IIc

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  47. Interesting by BlogPress · · Score: 1

    It'll be more interesting when more and more projects come out showing how they got this small form factor into situations that PCs couldn't really get to. Makes a perfect mobile computer for the car.

  48. Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Vandil+X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mac mini is not marketed by Apple as a server.

    That's why they made Xserves.

    The Mac mini is (and will always be) an entry-level Macintosh for the Macintosh curious who were previously turned off by pre-Mac mini computer prices.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by tetromino · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mac Mini server = $500 + $200 for good 250G IDE hard drive + $50 for case = $750.
      Xserve = $3000, and you still need to buy another drive (shipping 80G hard drives in a $3000 server? pathetic).

      Now, you might have a spare two grand lying around. I don't. If I want a ppc server, Mac Mini is what I am getting.

    2. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by i.r.id10t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd mod this as underrated... but I'd rather comment.

      My server is a Debian running iMac - 400mhz processor, 384mb ram, 20gb drive. More than powerful enough for hosting 3 email addresses, and serving a LAMP based site that gets a few hundred hits a week, my only complaint about both it and the Mac Mini is the lack of a second hard drive for redundancy/backup, but for my small scale purposes just rsyncing / to my ~/server-backup on my workstation is a perfect solution.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Horses for courses. The Xserve supports ECC RAM. The Mini doesn't. Hell, no Mac outside the Xserve line supports ECC. There are other factors as well that make the Xserve a better choice for serious serving.

      Of course, for the home user, this isn't an issue, in which case I say, go for it. Choose the system that's right for you. If you're running a business off it, I'd definitely recommend the Xserve. If the (low) chance of data corruption and downtime isn't a major issue for you, by all means use a cheaper Mac. Just make sure you go in with your eyes open, knowing what it is that you're using, rather than assuming all systems are made equal. They're not.

    4. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lack of a second hard drive? Hardly. I bet you could connect a few hundred hard drives to an iMac or a Mini. (And don't try to tell me 127 is the limit, 'cause that's USB, and we all know USB is crap.)

    5. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Hmmm....Then why does Apple list the Mac mini as a supported piece of hardware for OS X Server?

      Link Read the Requirements line near the bottom.

      Just something to think about.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    6. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by pv2b · · Score: 1

      Heh. Actually, I think the limit for how many Firewire devices you can put on a single bus is 63.

      So if USB is crap, Firewire is a steaming mound of bovine excrement.

      Then again, you'll probably run in to other problems than addressing concerns when adding that many hard drives on a Firewire bus anyway. Like all of the drives sharing a single 400 Mbit/s connection? ...

      I haven't mentioned Firewire 800 here, since the iMac G3 doesn't have FW 800, iirc.

      (Oh, btw. I love Firewire. I'm on an iBook G3, and Firewire definitely is better than USB 1.0 for connecting a hard drive... but if I had a newer Mac, I probably wouldn't really care if I connected it via Firewire or USB2 anyway...)

    7. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by pv2b · · Score: 1

      Oh, by the way. If you want to connect a *lot* of storage (as in a few terabytes) to your Mac, what Apple suggests you do is to get an Xserve RAID and a PowerMac G5 with a fibre channel card. :-)

      (Granted, I know nothing about Fibre channel and how fast it is. Way out of my price range anyway.)

    8. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that you are running Debian rather than the far more powerful OS X indicates to me that you are an amateur. Hardly someone worth listening to.

    9. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The Mac mini is not marketed by Apple as a server.

      Of course it isn't marketed as a server. Apple would much rather sell an XServe than a Mini.

      I go back a long way, I used to use a workgroup server 8150! You know what? The Mini smokes its ass. For many kinds of server applications, the Mini would be fantastic.

      The Mac mini is (and will always be) an entry-level Macintosh for the Macintosh curious who were previously turned off by pre-Mac mini computer prices.

      Don't delude yourself, a lot of the Mac users are what turn off people who would otherwise consider purchasing a Macintosh.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Xabraxas · · Score: 1

      Debian is a much more proven server than OSX is. Who do you think you are kidding?

      --
      Time makes more converts than reason
    11. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by dustmite · · Score: 1

      Since the OS X core is BSD, I wouldn't be so sure about that, although to be honest I think they're both pretty "proven servers", you could probably go either way here.

    12. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's kidding you. You replied.

    13. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well who are you kidding? Debian has proven nothing - there is nothing to gain by proving anything in the Debian world, other than winning nerd pissing contests. Apple on the other hand sells XServe with Mac OS X for big $$$. You can rely on it, unlike Debian, where you can only rely on it if some obese, noisome so-called "geek" unemployed programmer happened to want the same things you do.

    14. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
      More than powerful enough for hosting 3 email addresses, and serving a LAMP based site that gets a few hundred hits a week,

      What's the URL. ;-) Sure, it's sufficient if you don't actually use it for anything, but the minute you post a picture-by-picture slideshow of you disassembling your iBook to replace the hard drive with a SCSI drive you'll suddenly get 100,000 hits in a day in which case you'll crash it. My 386 could handle a few hundred hits a *day* easily but I don't say it's a server anymore.

    15. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by sparkster812 · · Score: 1

      It may not be marketed as a server, but if it meets the system requirements [I remember it requiring a stock G3, 128mb of RAM blah blah] then it'll install. Same way with a standard OS X installation... I installed OS X Server 10.3 on my iBook, and it worked great. [Apple however says they do not support server on portables, but it installs!]

      You can look at it this way if you like: it's better than Apple having it check machine IDs and saying "Oops, your machine isn't design to be a server!" and then refusing to install.

      Hell, it might even be an attempt to get more people looking at OS X server for the future.

    16. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by JQuick · · Score: 1


      you'll suddenly get 100,000 hits in a day in which case you'll crash it


      Wanna, bet?

      I did some tests a couple of years ago on an ancient (1997ish?) beige G3 running Macos X. Hammering on a mysql+php+apache based web app, did bring system performance to a crawl, and caused the majority of requests to timeout and fail. However, it did not crash once.

    17. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by jht · · Score: 1

      One other thing to consider (though for web serving it's not as big a deal):

      If you choose to use OS X Server instead of the included client version, it'll set you back $500 (for the 10-client version) or $1000 (for the unlimited-client). For the money, you get more/better tools built-in plus more robust AFP/SMB services and other goodies (the price differentiation is only for concurrent AFP sessions). You don't need MacOS X Server to run a mini as a web server, but it could be a Good Thing, and it's bundled for free when you buy an Xserve.

      Of course, if you're not running MacOS X (some version) on it, then what's the point of using Mac hardware? You might as well pick up a Shuttle SFF box and run Linux.

      --
      -- Josh Turiel
      "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
    18. Re:Mac mini is not marketed as a server by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Who cares for what purpose it was marketed? Casemodding a Mini into a fileserver, because it's cheap, fast, stable and works, is exactly the meaning of "hacking": making something do what you want, despite its designed function.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  49. what by geekoid · · Score: 1

    the Mod? or not refusing connections from slashdot?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  50. It's what you do. by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Case mods are a kind of hardware hacking, and hacking is something you do just because you enjoy doing it. It's the geek equivalent of those blue-collar guys on King of the Hill, who will move into a house and knock down and put up walls for no particular reason.

  51. appalling level of cluelessness today by X_Caffeine · · Score: 4, Insightful
    re: The whole point of the mac mini is it's small form factor
    re: It completely ruins the point of having a Mac mini.
    No, that's what YOU think the "point" of a Mac Mini is. To many (if not most) of us, the point is that it's an extremely affordable Mac.

    re: Part of the mac's allure is it's [sic] stylish looks. This is just as dumb as putting a PC in a mac mini case.
    Dumb to you. Cool to someone who didn't buy it for its sylish looks.

    Holy crap, people. This is Slashdot. Some of like to take apart things. Some of us like to take cheap computers and make them perform like expensive computers. We're hobbyists and tinkerers. Why take apart the Mac Mini? We don't need any reason better than "because we can."

    Hell, if I were to build a 5-desk office that needed a simple mail server and file server, the Mac Mini is just a RAID away from perfection, at less than a quarter the price of an XServe.

    The Mac Mini is a beautiful piece of hardware. I'd love to have two -- one that never gets turned on or used, just left on the mantel in a glass box with the fine china, and another that's gutted, rebuilt, and folding 24/7.

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    1. Re:appalling level of cluelessness today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, if I were to build a 5-desk office that needed a simple mail server and file server, the Mac Mini is just a RAID away from perfection, at less than a quarter the price of an XServe.

      You might want to replace the stock mini HDD with one that can handle 24/7 operation. Several people have been recommending the Hitachi Travelstar "E" series, like this model.

      One of them is sitting on my workbench, waiting for the mini that's going to house it. It will be replacing an old G3-upgraded Power Mac 7600 as the controller of my rather extensive X10 setup.

    2. Re:appalling level of cluelessness today by X_Caffeine · · Score: 1

      Seagate Baracuda 4 LYF yooooo

      --
      // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
    3. Re:appalling level of cluelessness today by runamok1 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Even if you don't agree with what someone is doing becaause it does not fit YOUR goals, point of view, etc. does not automatically make it useless useless. I think it's pretty cool that the modding folks are this excited about the Mini. I want one. I really do. And the parent hit on the reason why. IT'S CHEAP! The Mac Mini is barely more expensive than the photo iPod. Hell. A license for OS X costs $130... I am waiting for someone to find a cheap way to add bluetooth and wireless rather than have Apple do it. And I'd like for the next version of OS X to come out too. And err my tax refund... It is always easier to knock someone else's ideas than create your own.

  52. To the Slashdot Morons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A URL was given and you couldn't use it, so now it's down. Well done slashdot, wakeup and smell the bandwidth. Not everone can waste money.
    CyBrTaz

  53. No Mirrors by Agret · · Score: 1

    Looks like MirrorDot got there too slow!

    Why aren't links posted via Coral Cache?
    The whole point of it is to remove the /. effect!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
    1. Re:No Mirrors by xray_dude · · Score: 1

      Why would /. want to get rid of the /. effect?

  54. Non SQL dependant URL by AppleTalk · · Score: 1

    Hmm... we submitted this last night, but it got rejected.

    Here is the correct URL to use: http://www.appletalk.com.au/articles/miniserver/
    That one doesn't rely on SQL, so it will work.

    Also - can the first post be edited with this URL instead of the other one?

    --
    http://www.appletalk.com.au
    1. Re:Non SQL dependant URL by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      No, but a dupe of this story pointing to that URL will appear next Monday...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
  55. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by imr · · Score: 1

    What about the lack of noise?

  56. Or... by JanneM · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since you are going with mini-ATX in any case (sic), why build in a comparatively slow Mac mini when you could use a mini-ATX board with an Opteron and get a real 64-bit platform for about the same money in the same space?

    The project is cool for its own sake of course, but there doesn't seem to be a real use for it.

    Oh, and people freaking out over the "sarcriledge" - it's a computer, that's all. A piece of metal and plastic. If you really get upset about something like this, I suggest it's time to take a hard look at your priorities and your life.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  57. 404 haiku ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple no talking
    Server has failed query
    The mac sits in beige

  58. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOT! (FP or Excellent)

  59. Wheeee! by cwg_at_opc · · Score: 1

    we almost slashdotted /. !
    i waited nearly 30 minutes to get to the reply page!

    finally RTFA and i understand what he was getting at, but seriously, if you can't be bothered to find an aesthetic and
    clever way to implement an external storage system(http://mini-itx.com/news/83991250//) then it's just a half-as$ed job.

    --
    "...that's as white as it gets; all the bits are on..."
  60. Money:Time Ratio by Beltway+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Some people have more money than time, some people have more time than money. I think this is a pretty good solution for someone with more time than money.

    1. Re:Money:Time Ratio by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Some people have more money than time, some people have more time than money. I think this is a pretty good solution for someone with more time than money.

      My guess is that people with more time than money tend to not use Apples.

    2. Re:Money:Time Ratio by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right. Because Apples are computers for rich people.

      Snob appeal, and all that. Like when we were all kids. All the gang had cheap Huffy or Sears bikes, and we had a lot of fun with them. The snotty kid on the end of the block had a Schwinn, and all 'Schwinn-approved' accessories on it.

      Nobody liked that kid.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    3. Re:Money:Time Ratio by reallyrandy · · Score: 1

      When we were kids, we tried to disguise our crappy bikes as expensive bikes with confusing stickers so the actual name brand of the bike wasn't clear. Maybe this mac-in-a-beige-box project is the inverse; it would be refreshing to see my G4 powerbook wrapped in gray or black plastic. It would probably prevent theft.

    4. Re:Money:Time Ratio by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      The pretentious poor wear gold-plated jewelry.

      The upwardly-mobile-wannabes wear 12K gold jewelry.

      The truly rich people wear copper-plated platinum jewelry.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
  61. Re:Or... USB 2.0 drive bootable by puto · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I have a several no name portable usb 2.0 hard drives, and all are bootable.

    Google it up.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  62. And to think by mestreBimba · · Score: 1

    I gave my Apple IIc to the GoodWill. I knew I should have kept it!

    --
    Fly Fish? Participate in our forum
  63. Misread that by slapout · · Score: 1

    When I first read this, I thought they meant that they had added a 3.5 inch floppy drive to the Mac Mini! :-)

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Misread that by qyiet · · Score: 1

      That's easy, just add one of these

  64. Definition of "Nobody"... sad fact by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Nobody RTFA...

    Nobody would buy from spam either, right?

    78% Percent of users who report receiving spam daily
    11% Percent of users who report receiving at least 40 spam per day
    14% Percent of users who report they open spam messages to see what they say [Yikes!]
    4% Percent of users who report they have purchased a product or service advertised in a spam email

    So maybe 4% RTFA too? That's logic for you, bad logic, but logic none-the-less.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  65. A quick mirror! by .tekrox · · Score: 1

    I hope my ISP and AppleTalk.au don't mind - But here is Quick mirror to take the load off AppleTalk

    http://users.on.net/~matrox/appletalk.htm

  66. What a waste of effort by m00j · · Score: 1

    So he destroyed a brand new Mac Mini, transplanted it into the Micro ATX case with zip ties and runs two power supplies just so he can have a larger hard drive in it? I wonder if he realises that for half the cost of the Mac Mini he could have got a cheap Semperon 2200+ box that would have worked just as well. He could have even spent up big and built a more powerful server for the money he spent! Push comes to shove if he *really* wanted the Mac Mini with a larger hard drive he could have cut a small hole in the vents of the chassis and run the cable out through there and put the hard drive underneath the Mac Mini. No extra hardware required, no firewire or USB conversions just plain old vanilla IDE

    1. Re:What a waste of effort by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      You can only run the X11 half of Darwin on the Semperon box.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    2. Re:What a waste of effort by CityZen · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed the details.

      He didn't modify the Mini case at all, so that he can completely undo the setup and still have a pristine Mini.

      In addition, he didn't want to burden the Mini power supply to power two 3.5" 7200 RPM drives.

      And of course, he wanted a Mac, not a PC box.

    3. Re:What a waste of effort by briankoenig · · Score: 1

      You obviously did not RTFA. The second power supply was necessary for the harddrive, and the Mac Mini doesn't have a standard desktop 3.5" IDE cable connector.

    4. Re:What a waste of effort by ocelotbob · · Score: 1
      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    5. Re:What a waste of effort by m00j · · Score: 1

      Well I did, and it is not something that could not have been easily fixed with a plug pack or similar.

      AFAIK laptop hard drives use 12v also.

      Hard drives only use a lot of power spinning up, if it is a server it should not be spinning down all to often.

    6. Re:What a waste of effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the server environment Mac Vs PC makes little difference. The remarkable fact about a Mac is its motorola proc. Nothing else is incredibly special. Especially the operating system. If you just want a nice architecture, buy a server box with that architecture and run linux/BSD. I'm just pleading for some sanity.

  67. PCI card will fix that by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    you can sacrifice a PCI slot and put in a 3rd party card. i know they will acknowledge large drives. in the situation of an older G4 tower (100MHz mobo) you can get a good boost from adding an ATA133 card (like the one Sonnett makes). you can use the built in drive support for backups or something that do not need the size/speed. not optimum, but not a bad fix.

    MacAddict had a thing a few years ago where they took a G4 400MHz AGP sawtooth (100MHz motherboard) and added an 800MHz processor and an ATA133 card and ATA133 drive. the new drive gave their benchmarks as much of a boost as the processor upgrade (in most tests). i'm sure it's in their archives online. i have no idea when they did this, but i remembered the info because i own a G4 400. i am guessing almost 2 years ago?

  68. I can top that... by bshroyer · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm just finishing up the docs on my conversion - I've implanted a Dell Axim PocketPC into a Compaq Luggable. The biggest challenge was connecting the Axim's QVGA to the luggable's 80x32 amber CRT...

    The neat thing is, I've got more power in the luggable now than when it was new, and it wieghs about 15 pounds less, as well.

    --
    The cure for cancer is coming: Reovirus
  69. Yak! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see snowwhite get dumped in a pile of dung.

  70. A terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . at the end of the process it's still a mac right, so who cares?

  71. Do me a favor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just shut the frig up.

    Ok?

    Thanks.

  72. Why? Why not? by Sinryc · · Score: 1

    All of these people saying that this was stupid, or unneeded and even "Why?". My question to all of you, is.... Why not?

    --
    Yay, I have a sig.
  73. next level by tiredwired · · Score: 0, Troll

    He should mount the pc case inside a main frame case.

  74. external HD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe someone should clue this guy into external hardrives.

  75. Stupid Computer Trick by bcs_metacon.ca · · Score: 1

    Using a Mac mini as a server is like using a Ferrari to haul freight.

    His ambitions would've been better served by using that AOpen case and Maxtor hard drives with a cheapo x86 mobo/cpu and Linux. It would've been just as quiet (probably more so since he'd only have on PSU -- he could even splurge a bit and buy a quality quiet PSU to replace the stock one).

    Then he could've kept his quiet, stylish mini on his desk where it belongs!

    --

    How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
    1. Re:Stupid Computer Trick by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      No. It's like using a Volkswagen Jetta to haul freight.

      Can it with the Ferrari comparisons.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
    2. Re:Stupid Computer Trick by bcs_metacon.ca · · Score: 1

      You don't buy Apple for horsepower any more than you buy a Ferrari for gas mileage. It's about style, not performance.

      --

      How appropriate. You fight like a cow.
    3. Re:Stupid Computer Trick by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And pretentious prigs buy Volkswagen Jettas. Because of 'style.'

      I maintain my analogy is correct.

      --
      the namespace grows ever more crowded.
  76. Yeah by slashfucker · · Score: 1

    Next up, a kit to make your Ferrari look just like a Pontiac Fiero!

  77. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by suckmysav · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Why would someone deface a poor defenseless Mac Mini like this?"

    "Because the hard drive is slow (4200 RPM), and this is cheap."


    The guy stated that he wanted to build a server that was a) cheap, and b) quiet

    In short, he is an idiot.

    It is FAR cheaper to obtain an old Pentium based PC, which can easily be found for free as compared to the Mac Mini, which is $799 in Australia.

    This project is not a "cheap" way to build a server, it is an expensive way to build a server.

    Then there is the noise factor. Yes, the Mac Mini is quiet, much quieter than an old PC.

    But this is not where the story ends. Firstly he is making his Mac Mini almost as noisy as a PC, just by putting in a 3.5 inch HDD and running a PC powersupply complete with a PSU + FAN in it! The only other source of noise in a PC is the CPU fan and I explain below how that can usually be removed completly anyway. In such a scenario, a PC would make exactly the same noise that this Mac Mini does.

    When looking at typical, stock built PCs, there are four sources of operating noise to consider.

    1) PSU Fan. Both the modified Mac Mini and the recycled Pentium PC use a mini tower case, ergo we can expect the same level of PSU fan noise to emanate from both solutions. In both cases an aftermarket "near silent" fan can be fitted to minimise any noise. In any event, we can rule out any PSU fan noise that is present because both solutions will theoretically produce identical levels of noise. PSU fan noise is not a differentiating factor.

    2) CPU Fan. This is one area where the Mac Mini will beat the stock Pentium PC. But there is no reason you need to stick with the stock configuration. It is an easy matter on most old PCs to underclock the CPU. This in turn allows you in many cases to run your Pentium using a large, passive heatsink alone ie, it becomes just as noiseless as the Mac Mini.

    3) HDD noise. The modified Mac would use the exact same 3.5inch HDD as the Pentium PC, so we can rule this noise out too.

    4) GPU cooler. The mac mini doesn't use a seperate GPU cooler, and niether would the PC. It would most likely have some crappy old Trident or S3 based 2D card that has no fan but is perfectly acceptable in a server.

    The short story is that we can make a recycled PC just as quiet as this modified Mac mini so the noise issue is moot.

    Consider that the Mac Mini option would cost you something like;

    1.25 Ghz Mac Mini - $799
    Minitower PC case - $50
    3,5 Inch HDD ~ $150 (depending on what capacity you want)
    = $999 (Australian)

    compared to a recycled PC;
    2nd hand Pentium 233 - $50 (probably free but lets use a nominal figure anyway)
    Large passive heatsink - $25
    New PSU fan - $15 (the old one might be a bit worn)
    Linux/FreeBSD OS - $0
    = $90

    Basically, this goose has wrecked an eight hundred dollar Mac to build a ninety dollar server.

    What a moron.

    --
    "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  78. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by suckmysav · · Score: 1

    Oops, forgot to add the $150 for the 3.5 inch HDD to the PC server pricing. You can redo the mat I'm sure.

    --
    "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  79. Mac Classic by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    The real fun would be to stuff it into an old Mac Classic toaster and hook it up with the monitor.

    Could probably use it to gut and upgrade an older iMac.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  80. Aim higher by amyhughes · · Score: 2, Funny
    In an SE with a 6" LCD? It's been done with ITX boards a number of times. Boring. This one is better. He used a CRT that fit the Mac perfectly. Much more elegant...

    Mac ITX

    Do that with a Mini.

    Amy

  81. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

    What sort of workplace lets you bring your own computer in and connect to the network?

    What a bizarre idea!

  82. Heat? What heat? by stutterbug · · Score: 1

    The author of the article makes a big deal about heat and hard drives. I have built and rebuilt lots of desktop systems and I've seen lots of things burn out, but I have never, ever seen a hard disk fail on a computer that wasn't on a RAID-0 system and wasn't doing constant, heavy-duty through-put (all of them off-line video editors, where you almost always expect a drive to fail 'any day now'). I did buy one drive that quickly showed itself to be a dud and replaced it with an identical model with no further failures.

    What's the deal? Does anyone else here go through conniption fits every time you install a new HD?

    1. Re:Heat? What heat? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      You are very lucky. Out of the ten or so hard drives I have had in various computers, three of them fried themselves. I believe heat did in the first one (it was an early model Seagate 7200 RPM drive), manufacturing defects did in the second one (IBM DeathStar 75GXP), and plain old vibration and general abuse did in the third drive, my IBM Travelstar in my laptop. The most reliable drive I've ever owned was a Western Digital 120MB (yes, MB) drive -- the computer it was in got struck by lightning and the hard drive was the only part that survived.

    2. Re:Heat? What heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've lost drives, and sometimes the failures are partial (clusters found bad increasing over time) it's the easiest to see when you work in the trenches...1000, 3000, 10000, 15000 nodes. at those numbers you don't need statistics, you see the drives die daily on the desktops. of course, your statistical sample of one (yourself) is far more accurate. >>I have built and rebuilt lots of (snip) thanks but no thanks. share your vast knowledge and data on some other forum.

    3. Re:Heat? What heat? by stutterbug · · Score: 2, Funny

      I would imagine in the trenches, your nodes must suffer more from mud, rain, lack of sleep and jammed rifles cartridges. If I were you, I'd put your systems in a climate-controlled environment. You'd see a lot fewer failures.

      With your hubris of hundreds, try your cynicism with someone else.

  83. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by Jeff+Albertson · · Score: 1

    You could bolt some overclocker's dead Athlon to the inside of the case and run that jet turbine fan.

    --
    the namespace grows ever more crowded.
  84. Why bother with fancy mods? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    Why bother with fancy

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  85. Why bother with fancy mods? by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    Mac minis will fit inside some of the larger PC cases, and if you set your fans up right you could even have it inside a running PC.

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
  86. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    Because the hard drive is slow (4200 RPM)

    Some are 5400 RPM. Luck of the draw I heard.

  87. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Funny

    OS X will run X11 desktop environments natively, so you only have to hit a key combination to go from a full-screen X11 environment back to OS X. You could also run Windows on Virtual PC and complain about how incredibly slow it is. ;)

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  88. 2u rack mount case by mrnick · · Score: 1

    Put it in a 2u rack mount case and I'll be a happy camper!

    --

    Encryption: I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend your right to encrypt it...
  89. Why didn't they choose a SATA drive ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why they chose a PATA over a SATA drive for their mac-mini. Laptop SATA drives are available aplenty http://www.hitachigst.com/hdd/support/5k100/5k100. htm
    or is it because you still need PATA for CD/DVD drive ?

    1. Re:Why didn't they choose a SATA drive ? by nidx · · Score: 1

      because the mac mini does NOT have SATA

  90. I'm not even a Mac guy... by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not even a Mac guy, and the first thing that I thought of was "Geez, get a couple of external firewire drives." That would have been about the same price, would have looked better, would use less electric (enclosure power supplies vs. the ATX power supply used for the 3.5" hard drives), and performance would probably be as good as or better than his master/slave IDE hard drive setup.

  91. Who says? by HenryKoren · · Score: 1

    Who says you can't make a silk purse out of a pigs ear? ...Not a mac zealot!

    Just remember: doing sensible things like using clients as clients and servers as servers, isn't profound enough to get you onto slashdot.

  92. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by Halo5 · · Score: 1

    Any IT manager that would refuse an OSX machine in favor of a Wintel machine shouldn't be an IT manager. Plain and simple.

    I'm an IT manager, and I speak from experience. Unfortunately, I spend most of my time dealing with Wintel machines.

    Personally, I bought a Mini Mac just for sysadmin purposes. I like the idea of a machine that I can mount NFS shares and easily burn to DVDs (nothing against k3b, which is a great program!).

    --
    665: The mark on the forehead of Satan's slightly less evil brother, Stan.
  93. Not sure about the QuickSilver by dn15 · · Score: 1
    Power Mac G4 (QuickSilver) and Power Mac G4 (Mirrored Drive Door) systems both had room for 2 5.25" optical drives, PLUS 4 internal 3.5" drive bays.
    The QuickSilver models were only equipped to handle a Zip drive in that second bay. There was a sled for the optical drive and optional Zip, similar to the one found in the Graphite models. It might technically be possible to mount one but it would require a casemod to do so. For reference, check out this URL:
    http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/systems/quicksilver_noi se/quieting_quicksilver_noise.html
    Note the last photo. It's cropped a bit close, but you can see where that metal part surrounding the drives is large at the top but smaller on the bottom, making it only appropriate for Zip/floppy-sized drives.
  94. Mini-ITX, not miniATX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    An average miniATX case is about 5x14x16 = 1120 c.i.
    A mini case is 6x6x2.5 = 90 c.i.

    MyDixie wrote: "A small form-factor mini-itx case is still a small form-factor case."

    Mini-ITX is a motherboard form factor that measures 170mm x 170mm (6.7" x 6.7").

    The Travla C134 Mini-ITX Case measures 7" x 10" x 2" = 140 cubic inches.

    A factor of ONE AND A HALF, but it only accepts 2.5" hard drives.

    The Travla C158 Mini-ITX Case measures 12" x 11" x 2.1" = 277.2 cubic inches.

    A factor of THREE, but it accepts 3.5" hard drives and a PCI card.

  95. I'll prove you wrong by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 3, Funny

    More than powerful enough for hosting 3 email addresses...

    Just tell me which three e-mail addresses.

  96. Group policy across two platforms? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Any IT manager that would refuse an OSX machine in favor of a Wintel machine shouldn't be an IT manager.

    It's not refusing one Mac OS X machine in favor of one Wintel machine; it's refusing 155 Wintel machines and one Mac OS X machine in favor of 156 Wintel machines. Some level of uniformity makes it easier to administer all the machines.

    1. Re:Group policy across two platforms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Making your job easier is not your job. Your job is making other people's jobs easier - yet another IT "manager" who doesn't understand this...

    2. Re:Group policy across two platforms? by ceeam · · Score: 1

      Damn right! And as they say: "A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"

  97. //e //easy by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    Heck if you're going to use a //e just open the lid and set the Mini inside. There's plenty of room.

    Your only challenge will be retrofitting a VGA monitor inside the old Apple ][ Display case.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  98. This is nothing by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    I'm bought a duel G5. Ripped out the guts and crammed it all into an old Packerd-Bell case I had in the garage.

    1. Re:This is nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you sir are an idiot...

    2. Re:This is nothing by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      You sir are missing your funny bone.

  99. Ok. I'll do it... by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    1. do silly mini mac mod and post to /.
    2. ?
    3. profit!

  100. CPU speed by tepples · · Score: 1

    Consider that the Mac Mini option would cost you something like; 1.25 Ghz Mac Mini - $799 [...] 2nd hand Pentium 233 - $50

    You're comparing a PII clocked at 233 MHz to a G4 clocked over five times as fast. Won't this cut the throughput of your application server?

    1. Re:CPU speed by Zooka · · Score: 1
      "Won't this cut the throughput of your application server?"

      Well, from TFA:
      "I intend using it to store MP3s, images and video, and will stream music to various places around the house."
      Does one really need a 1.X GHz CPU to accomplish that?
    2. Re:CPU speed by suckmysav · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Won't this cut the throughput of your application server?"

      Well, from TFA:

      "I intend using it to store MP3s, images and video, and will stream music to various places around the house."

      Does one really need a 1.X GHz CPU to accomplish that?


      The answer is, of course, "no".

      We are talking 100Mbit ethernet (wired) or 11/55Mbit (wireless) here. Any pentium class PC is more than capable of serving media files to ethernet at the rate of 100Mbit per second.

      The truth is, this moron spent a thousand bucks on something he could have done for less than two hundred, and wrecked a really nice piece of equipment in the process.

      He would have been far better off if he had have bought himself a pentium box to make a media server out of and used his Mini Mac as the media player in his living room.

      --
      "You can't fight in here, this is the war room!"
  101. BONG! by taxevader · · Score: 3, Funny

    About 2/3 of the way through the article:

    'Finally came the big test - with everything attached I hit the switch. BONG...it's alive! '

    No buddy, a BONG is the thing you were smoking when you came up with this inane idea. Whats next, putting the ipod into an old-school walkman shell?

    8)

    --
    -Copyright law #69:Whenever Mickey Mouse is about to enter the public domain,copyrights get extended by 25 years.
    1. Re:BONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.retropod.com/

    2. Re:BONG! by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  102. Insurance by tepples · · Score: 1

    a kit to make your Ferrari look just like a Pontiac Fiero!

    But wouldn't disguising your Ferrari automobile as a Pontiac have a potential to cut your auto insurance premium?

  103. Re:Well - Small S/PDIF connections are available by matt_maggard · · Score: 1

    While I understand your point about built-in functionality being preferable, there are USB digital audio 'dongles' available which aren't too expensive and are also fairly small. I am going to be adding one of the following to my Mac mini (if it ever gets here - jeesh).

    Edirol UA-1x

    M-Audio Transit

    Hope this helps.

  104. Aussie site? by POds · · Score: 1

    Gee, i never would have guessed

    http://www.appletalk.com.au/articles/ipodshuffle /b eer.jpg

    If there are any americans that actualy bother drinking fosters (i no i havnt), then get yourself some real aussie beer (if you can). I recommend the beer the shuffle is compared to in the above picture.

    --


    Giving IE users a taste of their own medicine since 2005 - http://pods.-is-a-geek.net/
    1. Re:Aussie site? by Suburbanpride · · Score: 1

      Out west, you can get James Squire ale at Trader Joe's, which I think is the best Aussie beer you can get here. When I live In australia, I drank mostly coopers, since it was good and not that much more expensive than VB or Tooheys. Too mad mac stuff was way way more expensive

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    2. Re:Aussie site? by AppleTalk · · Score: 1

      Whoop.
      yes, Coopers is the finest beer in the world. Thanks for giving that shuffle review a look in. :)

      --
      http://www.appletalk.com.au
  105. What's next? Man connects printer to Mac Mini? by groomed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is anybody actually surprised that you can connect a hard drive to a Mac Mini?

    Or am I too jaded? Is the great feat here that somebody managed to open a computer case?

    Or does the Mac Mini contain salvaged Area 51 technology which shoots lasers when exposed, and did he develop a force field generator to be able to safely locate the ATA connector?

    Or did his wife expressly forbid him from buying the Mac Mini, and has he frozen his wife inside a time bubble while devising a way to hide the Mac Mini?

    But then how does he unfreeze her?

    Can't wait to hear what happens next!

    1. Re:What's next? Man connects printer to Mac Mini? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I really hate to be the one to point out that you're a dumb shit (or at least sounding like one), but the Mac mini doesn't have a standard ATA connector, so part of the modder's challenge was to make his own adapter. I know, you weren't able to RTFA, but what sort of dumb shit spouts sarcastic crap about something they didn't even read?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:What's next? Man connects printer to Mac Mini? by groomed · · Score: 1

      Riiight. And such a challenge it must have been. Connect wire 1 to wire 1. Connect wire 2 to wire 2. Connect wire 3 to wire 3. Repeat. What a testament to man's ingenuity.

  106. raid 5 on the LAN by lasse_2 · · Score: 1

    No put you can raid 5 with some USB harddrives and convert it to a LAN drive.
    I not sure if this has performance enough for you but you can then put a WIFI at the back and have a network raid 5 server ;)

    http://www.iodata.jp/prod/storage/hdd/2004/usl-5p/ index.htm
    Sorry this in Japanese only.

    Lars

  107. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by rhennigan · · Score: 1

    ...this is pretty much the worst article ever.

    As if anyone could know that...

  108. 5'' by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Why not get it to accept 5'' floppies while your at it?

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  109. Re:Ok. I'll do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you forgot step 2: Fire Rick Berman out of a cannon and charge $5 a ticket to watch....

  110. Perhaps not marketed as a server... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Mac Mini may not be marketed as a server. But like the HTPC use which it also has not been marketed for, I have seen multiple people speculate about using one in such a capacity.

    There is already at least one company offering (somewhat cheap) Mac mini hosting. You get a whole Mac mini (not shared), you can either buy your own and have them house it, or lease to own.

    It's actually a really nice idea, since it's about as dirt cheap as a standalone unit can get, and the small size and low power make it a great deal for the colo company. It's a lot easier than letting people just throw SFF boxes at the colo provider which may have differeing power needs and might not stack well.

    After all, most web pages around could easily be served off a Mini running Apache (which comes standard) as they will not will not really be CPU (or even possibly disc depending on what is being served) bound.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  111. Heck, house it in a working PC... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    It's just about small enough to hide altogether in a small drive bay!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  112. Another floppy hookup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading about the iPod shuffle and floppy disk RAIDs, I thought this was going to be about hooking up a 3.5" floppy disk drive to the mini.

  113. The Internal Conversations of The Converted by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mac Mini in mini-ATX case boots for furst time

    Mac Mini:
    That's odd, it feels so drafty... my case I can't feel my case! What is going on? Wait, computer two across the room has an iSight!

    Mac mini opens iChat and connects to Computer Two

    Mac Mini:
    That's odd, I can't see myself anywhere... zoom in... refine picture... there's nothing just that giant brick and.... ... ..
    THE HORROR!!!

    Mac Mini connects power supply to ground directly across processor core - bet you didn't know it could do that! HCF opcode lives on.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The Internal Conversations of The Converted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gentlemen, we can rebuild it. we have the technology, the capability to make the first Bionic Mac. Maxi Mac will be that mac. Better than it was before. Better...stronger...faster.

    2. Re:The Internal Conversations of The Converted by rickumus · · Score: 1

      He He . This is stupid because who wants a huge case. Unless you trying to make a server ther is no point.

  114. A terminal in any other case... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that something like a MacMini was meant to populate the other end of the network infrastructure. If I want a server, I build a server. Modding is fun, but if the point is to use it as a server, I can build a special purpose server at a lower price tag than that. Plus just as a bonus, the system is standard, so when the inevitable problems occur, you can fix them by running to the local pc shop and buying something off the shelf. If you just want to prove you can do it though, happy modding.

  115. gentoo by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 2, Funny

    you know how long Gentoo would take to install on that 2nd hand pentium 233 you speak of?!?!?!!?

    psshhhhh...

    --



    ...spike
    Ewwwwww, coconut...
  116. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I still think Canadians suck. Hard.

  117. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by MonoSynth · · Score: 1

    Also add an old 486 with Linux+SAMBA to let both computers access the same drives over SMB :)

  118. Not as drastic and you think by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

    I saw the article a few days ago. He didn't need to "rip out it's guts" fortunately. He removed the top of the case, the optical drive and the laptop HD. He built an adapter to go from the laptop HD connector on the Mobo to a standard HD ribbon cable.

    He secured the mini by attaching the bottom half of the case to the interior of the PC case with cable ties.

    This was also pointed out previously by an AC, so maybe you didn't see the comment.

    --
    It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
  119. its -all- about the hd speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    i have a powerbook g4, and my hard drive failed. as a "keep working right now" solution i pulled a 7200rpm disk into a firewire enclosure off the shelf, and booted from that instead.

    HOLY CRAP! my powerbook is now sooo much faster. boots in 25% of the time. ram is over 1G. the ONLY time the thing feels slow is when i have (no joke) 15 medium to heavy apps open, while i try to play World of Warcraft.

    its 2 months later and i'm still running it like that.

    as an added bonus, when we travel i just bring the enclosure, and boot my wifes powerbook with it and get -exactly- my familiar environment. an unplug and reboot and she gets her powerbook back.

    similarly, when i do get around to having the hd replaced (man, the do-it-yourself job with the new pb's is a big pain) i can use any loaner while its in the shop and have -exactly- my familiar environment.

    i would -never- have guessed how cool this is.

    1. Re:its -all- about the hd speed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, and to keep this more On Topic.

      the first of my friends to buy a mac mini will get a visit from me with my firewire enclosure in hand. even money says i can boot from it with no worries

      (ever try to boot a windows 98 installed disk from a dell on a compaq?)

      once i know that works, the mac mini will become my new backup computing resource. since i got rid of all my x86 crap a year ago for the first time i didn't have multiple boxes ready to go on a moments notice. so smitten with the pb was i that i neglected simple redundancy at the hw level.

  120. You're kidding, right? by Kjella · · Score: 1

    The WD Raptor 10000rpm has transfer rates from 72 (inner) to 54 (outer) MB/s. A latest-gen 7200rpm drive have around 60 to 38 MB/s. A 5400rpm 2,5" drive even less, and doubly less for being smaller (less area/round). In addition, a desktop drive now has 8 (some even 16) MB cache, which is a great performance boot at times.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  121. Amiga mods of yore... by xixax · · Score: 1

    We used to do exactly that mod to Amiga 1200s all the time. You get a 44 way connector and cable, tease the wire apart on the other end and crimp on a regular 40 way IDE connector. If you were particularly sane, you even soldered in a seperate power connector (rather than using the power on the 44 way) so you had plenty of juice. No Amiga in our user group escaped with its warranty sticker intact... Why? 3.5" drives are heap cheaper.

    Xix.

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  122. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by nathanh · · Score: 1
    1.25 Ghz Mac Mini - $799 Minitower PC case - $50 3,5 Inch HDD ~ $150 (depending on what capacity you want) = $999 (Australian)

    compared to a recycled PC; 2nd hand Pentium 233 - $50 (probably free but lets use a nominal figure anyway) Large passive heatsink - $25 New PSU fan - $15 (the old one might be a bit worn) Linux/FreeBSD OS - $0 = $90

    Basically, this goose has wrecked an eight hundred dollar Mac to build a ninety dollar server.

    If we're really going to compare those two systems then let's be serious about it.

    CPU: 7 year old 233MHz Pentium vs 1.25GHz G4. Performance increase of 10-15x.

    Memory: 64MB 66MHz vs 256MB 333MHz. Capacity increase of 4x and performance increase of 5x.

    Network: 10Mbps Ethernet and no wireless vs 100Mbps Ethernet and 54Mbps wireless.

    Disk: 7 year old 5GB HDD vs brand new 200GB disk. Capacity increase of 40x and performance increase of 10x.

    Software: Gentoo x86 vs MacOS X. Your P233 simply wouldn't run MacOS X, and you can see from the screenshots that's what he's running.

    So your $90 PC has 1/40th the disk capacity, runs about 1/10th the speed, and doesn't run the software the guy wants. And you were calling him a goose?

    I really don't think your comparison was even close to fair. A comparable x86 system would have been a Celeron or Duron 1.1GHz. A system like that, with 256MB RAM, is still around $250AUD second hand. You should have also included the brand new $150AUD HDD on both sides of the equation. Add 54Mbps wireless and a decent 100Mbps Ethernet card for $100AUD. Add a DVD/CDRW for another $70AUD. The second-hand PC now costs $570AUD, doesn't have firewire, is a Frankenstein hodge-podge of bits, and still doesn't run MacOS X.

    And frankly you missed the point anyway. This guy modded his Mac mini in an unusual way. If you didn't get the point then maybe you need to reconsider if Slashdot is really your cup of tea.

  123. In other news ... by kabz · · Score: 1

    In other news, Australian 'engineers' transplanted the engine from a priceless Bugatti into a 1986 Nissan Crew Cab light pickup.

    The engineers were later heard to complain that the engine 'lacked pickup'.

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  124. just crying out for using standard PC hardware by nomadicGeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The point of the mini was to win converts by offering a low entry point to the Mac. They can't be making much if any margin on the thing.

    They would probably make more money by just selling a version of OS X for standard PC hardware. They could sell it for $149 with a $99 annual maintenance fee. Start adding up extra sales of iLife, etc and you could be talking about real money.

    The problem with the mini is that it is still a fairly high price just to try. I also think that the performance is not going to stand up to a standard PC at that price point which would have a much faster and larger hard drive and more RAM.

    How about putting OS X for the PC out there with a free 60 day trial? Imagine being able to install OS X on an existing Windows PC that was rotten with spy ware. People would gladly pay the $149 to keep it. I know people who are shelling out $100 out of desperation just for a virus scanner and cheesy anti-spy ware software that they hope will fix the problem only to fall victim again. If Apple developed an easy way to install OS X over Windows while saving documents, pictures, etc. they would have a real winner on their hands.

    Apple would make more money this way and they wouldn't have to tie up the capital required to manufacture and distribute the hardware. They could still sell the higher end hardware which they probably make a good margin on. There will always be that small group that want a real Mac.

    1. Re:just crying out for using standard PC hardware by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      I know people who are shelling out $100 out of desperation just for a virus scanner and cheesy anti-spy ware software that they hope will fix the problem only to fall victim again. If Apple developed an easy way to install OS X over Windows while saving documents, pictures, etc. they would have a real winner on their hands.

      ... and once the Mac community hit critical mass, the viruses and adware would come, then they could continue to pay for virus checkers and adware removers. It's happening with PDAs, cellphones, and Linux, it'll happen when/if enough people switch to MacOS. These knuckledraggers won't stop just because it's MacOS, and they've got an inordinate amount of time to research obscure security holes. All they need is a target "audience" that's big enough. Now I'm not saying that MS doesn't make things easier for them because of their dedication to "innovative" features and their slow reaction to known flaws, but that doesn't mean that MacOS X is impervious.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  125. So riddiculous! Gimme a break!!! :-P by Ansiguy · · Score: 1

    Transplanting a Mac mini, in to a ATX case would be just so ridiculous. I would buy a Mac mini for its looks and compact size. If I was desperate to add extra hard drive, why would I spent whole lot of money and time screwing and transplanting the creative mac mini on an ATX box? shheeesh.......I'd just buy an external hard drive, as the prices for external hard drives have dropped so much.
    Don't forget that Mac mini's have usb ports!!!

  126. Everyone answers to HR by tepples · · Score: 1

    Making your job easier is not your job. Your job is making other people's jobs easier

    The problem is that in order to make users' lives easier across two platforms, HR would have to hire additional IT staff. Unless you can make a business case that the Mac will improve your value to the company by at least the trebled salary of an IT professional specializing in Mac OS X, then it's better for the business's bottom line to keep everyone on the same platform.

    1. Re:Everyone answers to HR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not an IT guy, so I don't really know. But perhaps someone can explain why more IT staff would be needed if Macs were allowed in the door? Couldn't there be a policy that says there's no IT support for "non-standard" h/w or s/w? I.e., if you want to use a Mac, you're on your own to set it up. Rules about what kind of traffic you could put on their network would still apply. Seems to me most of the people here would be fine with that.

    2. Re:Everyone answers to HR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's only better for your lazy ass - which I am sure contribute nothing to the bottom line.

      Having a user with a Mac does not require one full-time IT professional. You really don't know much about the platform at all, do you?

      Stop thinking like a corporate drone!

  127. Signal processing for DivX encoding by tepples · · Score: 1

    Does one really need a 1.X GHz CPU to accomplish that?

    Video was mentioned. Can a PII 233 decode a DVD and encode video to DivX in a reasonable amount of time?

    1. Re:Signal processing for DivX encoding by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      Talk about serving video. Do you really decode your video before you shunt it over the network?

    2. Re:Signal processing for DivX encoding by tepples · · Score: 1

      Talk about serving video. Do you really decode your video before you shunt it over the network?

      No, but you have to encode it to DivX once before you send it. Or would you rather store 8 GiB collections of VOB files decrypted directly from DVD?

    3. Re:Signal processing for DivX encoding by grahamlee · · Score: 1

      You do it once, you really don't care how long it takes. Although I don't see the problem with storing raw VOBs; I didn't realise some people think of 8GB as being lots. And yes, in media storage capacity is given in GB not GiB - nice attempt at pedantry but being correct is often helpful.

    4. Re:Signal processing for DivX encoding by tepples · · Score: 1

      You do it once, you really don't care how long it takes.

      If you have a collection of several dozen DVDs, you put together a new media center PC, and encoding takes longer than a day, it could be more than a month before it's up and running.

      I didn't realise some people think of 8GB as being lots.

      Not every case will fit enough drives for storing some people's collections as VOB and FLAC.

      And yes, in media storage capacity is given in GB not GiB

      A DVD-9 can be up to 7.95 GiB or 8.53 GB. I chose GiB because 1. that's what the OS reports, and 2. it's closer to a nice round number 8.

    5. Re:Signal processing for DivX encoding by grahamlee · · Score: 1
      If you have a collection of several dozen DVDs, you put together a new media center PC, and encoding takes longer than a day, it could be more than a month before it's up and running.

      Well, certainly more than a day. Anyway, the point is that they don't need encoding, you just need to bung a cheap SATA controller (assuming your OS of choice supports it) and cheap big SATA disk in there...the OPs "ancient" P3 is capable of sustaining 100Mbps or even 54Mbps network transfer - the latter will chuck a whole DVD across the network in around 21 minutes. That's shorter than the time required to play a DVD, therefore you can easily get by without recoding the DVD and using said ancient machine to blat it at your viewstation of choice. You could even get an Ultra 5 for a tenner off eBay to do it for you - good luck finding a SATA controller though :-/

      Not every case will fit enough drives for storing some people's collections as VOB and FLAC.

      Those people probably have more than 800GB of media then (where I've guessed that any sensible case people will choose for a server can take at least two disks). These are edge cases. In the main, people have [i]local optical drives for playing DVDs (and hence may be willing to only encode the core of their DVD library) , [ii]no problem with listening to 160k or even 128k compressed lossy sound.

    6. Re:Signal processing for DivX encoding by Zooka · · Score: 1
      "Video was mentioned. Can a PII 233 decode a DVD and encode video to DivX in a reasonable amount of time?"

      Sigh... Again I quote the article:

      "I intend using it to store MP3s, images and video, and will stream music..."

      STORE video!!!!! Not decode, not encode... STORE & serve! FFS, stop arguing about what it can't do, and let's remain focused on what the author intends it to do! This box is being put into service as a server, and surely he has other PCs for doing things that would require greater resources.
  128. Back in the time ... by Reez · · Score: 1

    We did the same with Amiga 1200 that had an internal slot for 2.5" HDD: using a custom made 2.5" to 3.5" ribbon, and either stuffing the bigger disk into the case, or like i did, plug a hole on the back to make the ribbon go outside and plug the 3.5" disk, using also a PC power supply for the external 2 GB HDD (and later, 4x CDROM !). Not very nice (using the top of a Verbatim floppies packing to support the psu switch, and the box of an accelerator card to fit the HDD into) but it still works :)

  129. Re:Protesters, have you thought of this USEFUL rea by sysadmn · · Score: 1

    Actually, the mac mini is small enough you don't have to take it out of it's case to hide it in a PC case. Hope the boss doesn't look too closely at the "new drive" I installed in my tower desktop :-)

    --
    Envy my 5 digit Slashdot User ID!
  130. HOW IS THIS A TROLL, YOU SIMPLETONS??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Answer me! Tell me why you marked the parent a troll!

    1. Re:HOW IS THIS A TROLL, YOU SIMPLETONS??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Answer me! Tell me why you marked the parent a troll!

      Oh no you don't. You're not tricking me into replying so that I undo the moderation.
      Who do you think you're dealing with, anyway? Kids?

    2. Re:HOW IS THIS A TROLL, YOU SIMPLETONS??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      Damn.

  131. Re:As Napoleon Dynamite would say... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

    This guy is obviously a complete idiot. Why didn't he just attach a Firewire external HD? It would have cost him less, been quieter looked better and been both more upgradeable AND resalable.

    What an idiot.

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
  132. what I'm thinking... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really interested in the adapter he had made, but would really like for the drive to be powered by the current power supply. I want to do something similar to the mini-itx projects and put it into an old se or a radio or something unique.... But I would love a faster internal drive.

    In the article he suggests changing the pin sex wouldn't work... is this true?
    Any ideas how to make this happen?

    P.S. Not all Mac users are judgmental dweebs.

  133. Mac User(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Disclaimer*
    I am an Apple user, but please don't hold it against me.
    I'm not rich.
    People I meet don't call me a snob.

    We should all rejoice when someone mods a mac!
    Whether it's to stick it in a cars dashboard or send it up in a satellite, This Is A Good Thing(TM).
    Face it, that little adapter he had made will be available for sale soon! He is even selling the ones he has left over. Then any of us will be able to take advantage of any tips and tricks modders work out for us!
    I want the choice of having a 3.5" as an internal drive. Maybe it's new case is humidor or a gas can, or some other item, but it should be my choice (whether or not it makes sense to you)!
    Adaptability will insure a stronger future for the mac.
    Modders don't want to shell out for a laptop just to hack it up, and buying a crt imac is kinda silly for modding too.
    Really I wish Apple would sell the logic board to the public!
    I can't wait to see the mini used as a robotics platform!

  134. How about a hot swap mini cluster in an ANS? by catmistake · · Score: 1

    I think it begs to be done. http://everymac.com/systems/apple/network_server/s tats/networkserver_700_200.html Tons of space for HDs, and with the drawers replaced with minis that swap, some custom inteface they could plug right into, there's no need to tear the mini apart...

  135. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how the fuck do I get to a DOS prompt?

  136. Re:Connect wire 1 to wire 1. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    groomed (202061)
    "Riiight. And such a challenge it must have been. Connect wire 1 to wire 1. Connect wire 2 to wire 2. Connect wire 3 to wire 3. Repeat. What a testament to man's ingenuity. "

    Would you do it for me then. I'm actually a little intimidated that I might mess up. Post a link to the website that you will sell them at. Call it a Mac-mini accessory. I'd really love it if you keep it under 9.99 plus shipping, but I realize you really want to charge 19.95 or 24.95 for it. Realize if you overcharge, then more of us who want to do this will continue to kludge something together on our own until it's reasonable.
    I want my Mac-mini in a cuckoo-clock.

  137. Not a Mod I would do, but I understand why by JSRockit · · Score: 1

    Sure, the Mini is cool by itself...but this guy was just trying to make it more usable for himself. Not everyone is an aesthetics first type of user. Plus, the Mini is so cheap...he can just buy another one for looks.

    --
    I must be wakewalking through dreams.
  138. counterpoint by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Since Slashdot shows your autoappended .sig only to readers of your posts, not the writer, you might not have noticed the irony of what we got to read:

    "it's slow, only 40G, I know this is sorta off topic but I remeber having two 47MB hard drives, I thought that was a lot. Also the fast 386 running at 33mhz!!!
    --
    Once you have flown, you walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been & there you long to retur
    "

    --

    --
    make install -not war