Slashdot Mirror


Mandrakesoft Acquires Conectiva

rednaxel writes "This morning, both companies issued press releases about the merge. French Mandrakesoft is acquiring all shares of brazilian Conectiva for a total amount of 1.79 million EUR (2.3 million USD) in stock." CNet has coverage of the merger as well. From the article: "This won't elevate us to the status of Red Hat or Novell/SuSE yet, of course, but this is a significant growth for us..."

229 comments

  1. How? by sfraggle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do they have the money to do this? Werent they almost bankrupt about a year ago?

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:How? by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually, how how, do they make money by giving their product away for free? I can see red hat doing consulting/support, but mandrake caters to a different market

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:How? by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a stock swap. No money is involved. This is typical of how mergers often work. The companies agree to merge, and they agree what the company being acquired is worth, do some math, and convert the shares of the acquired company into shares of the new company. The math is much like doing a stock split, though the ratio usually involves a number of decimal points. (The accounting for the investors is also much like a stock split.)

      The real question in this case is why is Mandrakesoft's stock worth enough for Conectiva investors to consider this to be a worthwhile deal (as opposed to grabbing on to a sinking ship). I haven't looked at the business side of either company, so I can't comment there.

    3. Re:How? by Elranzer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This won't elevate us to the status of Red Hat or Novell/SuSE yet...

      Or the userbase of Debian either.

    4. Re:How? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, I think it was 3 or 4 years ago, but not only were they almost bankrupt, they actually were in bankruptcy in the French court system. They got their act together though, and have come completely out of bankruptcy, and I believe have been in the black for a while now.

      As far as I know, their main sources of revenue are from consulting, corporate support, some value added like packages of various proprietary closed-source software to their OS, and through their club membership program. I understand that this last one has been a decent boon to their books, moreso than one may think. Of course, I am not an accountant...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    5. Re:How? by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find this particularly intriguing, since ABN-AMRO Bank has been the major shareholder (50%+) of Conectiva last time I checked. Most than US$ 2Mil worth of stocks.

      Anyone knows how much (if anything) of Mandrake stocks are held by ABN ?

      Looks like (from the numbers) Mandrake is getting only the remaing stocks still help incompany by the original founders of Conectiva.

      Unless there is some big involvment of ABN on Mandrake, I find this all very strange.

      --
      morcego
    6. Re:How? by papaia · · Score: 3, Informative

      How? - simply: it's people like myself, who have identified them as having a proper business model (Mandrake Club subscriptions + a well established support community + very good paid support + products which fit every requirement I had, in time, and within costs (e.g. latest being the 64-bit CPU support among the first distros), who have then - provided the finacial support they needed (as a result of their services, of course)
      ... and when the US economy got derailed but its leadership, a small migration of my money, from US stocks, into MDKFF stock, came to prove to me, in time, that they also knew and know HOW to make money ;)

      --
      == With enough Will Power, one could move mountains. With enough Brains, one would just leave them where they are ==
    7. Re:How? by DCowern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How do they have the money to do this? Werent they almost bankrupt about a year ago?

      First, their financial situation was never as bad as it sounded. They had no money and couldn't fulfil debt obligations because a previous board of directors had moved them into to many business areas that were too far removed from their core business model (which has always been selling support and services to corporations).

      Once they axed the former board, ceased unprofitable ventures, and got back to their core profitable model, things quickly improved. Their financial reports and quarterly summaries on their website go in to much more detail.

      Secondly, they beefed up their Mandrake Club offering. It's currently a substantial portion of their revenue (I want to say 20-25%).

      Third, released a bunch of stock a few years ago in an attempt to raise capital to renegotiate and pay off debt.

      Lastly, the rules governing bankruptcy in France are far more forgiving and lenient than they are in the US. Mandrake wisely used the time and mechanisms that the bankruptcy filing awarded them and they're now seeing the benefits as they are on extremely sound financial footing.

      By the way, yes, I am a shareholder and this news makes me very happy. The leadership at Mandrakesoft over the past few years has been excellent and I have faith in their ability to grow their company. Besides, with a 300% rise in their stock price in the last 4 months, I can't complain too much, now can I? =P

    8. Re:How? by Moulinneuf · · Score: 0

      "They had no money and couldn't fulfil debt obligations "

      WRONG ! MandrakeClub whas making millions , the problem whas the creditor asking to be paid without any delay.

      Also I will add that Sales , Services and Support are plagued by the current Management.

      " Once they axed the former board"

      Jacques Le Marois is still there , Poole whas not the descision maker, MandrakeSoft contrary to popular belief is more then a match to Red Hat , the problem is that Idiot. He block sales , still make stupid exlusive dealls , Make deals for a quick buck but which are harming MAndrakeSoft expansion in the immediate and futur, Speaking of the HP deal which is exclusive to ONLY France (not even europe)

      MandrakeClub is 80% of there income , they use that money to develop there failing corporate side , which could be made into a winner if they at least promoted it properly , and the other venture which dont pay off.

      "the rules governing bankruptcy in France are far more forgiving and lenient than they are in the US."

      WRONG ! The rule for Bankrupty are far more oppresive in France.

      Mandrake never whas in Bankrupty protection they where in cessation of payment which is two step above Bankrupty.

      "The leadership at Mandrakesoft over the past few years has been excellent "

      Little secret for you MandrakeSoft as more product and is bigger worldwide then Red Hat , they are in market Red Hat dont even know exist.

      Red Hat is worth 4 billion
      MandrakeSoft is worth 30 Million now ...

      "Besides, with a 300% rise in their stock price in the last 4 months"

      Actually , your stock price as lost 15% of its value they did not raised capital they diluated the stock and the current price is 1$ over the initial price of its introduction to the market
      7$.

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    9. Re:How? by DCowern · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Facts, please.

      Mandrake club is currently less than or equal to 28% of their revenue, not the 80% you claim. From their latest quarterly summary:

      Product sales amounted to 51% of revenues, enterprise services 21% and online sales and services 28%.

      So you're dead wrong about where their money comes from.

      Also, your numbers are slightly off. According to that same report, Mandrake is worth about 40 million euros (market value); that's about 50 million USD. Sure, they're not the size of RedHat but that's one of the reasons I like them.

      I don't know where you got the loss figure from but I bought the stock at 2.1 euros. On 4 August 2004, it was 2.39 Euros. It is now 7.60 Euros. Unless Canadian math is different than American math, that's a 317% growth in the period from August 2004 to February 2005. Overall, that's a growh of about 361%. That's not a bad return over the 2.5 years that I've owned the stock

      Representing your opinion and numbers you pull out of your ass as fact is embarassing when people call you on it, eh? ;-)

      And oh, by the way, I happen to like M. LeMarois. He's always been cordial and straightforward in my dealings with him and he seems to have a good idea of where the company should be headed. That, of course, is just my opinion.

    10. Re:How? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're mostly right, it's a paper transaction that does not involve cash. The seller is paid in Mandrake stock, not in cash.

      Yet your analogy with stock splits is erroneous. In a stock split, nothing really happens. Each old share becomes 2 or 10 new shares. It's just a story of splitting the cake in more pieces, but everybody still has the same proportion of the cake. An investor that used to own 1% of the stock will own twice (or ten times) more shares but still own 1% because the total number of outstanding shares has been doubled (decupled).

      In a merger, the cake increases but you have a smaller part of it. An investor owning 1% of Mandrake before the deal will now own 0.96% of Mandrake+Conectiva (since Mandrake's market cap seems to be around 40mEUR).

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    11. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could Kmart buy Sears? They were bankrupt as well. Reorganization is a marvelous thing...

    12. Re:How? by rsborg · · Score: 1
      a small migration of my money, from US stocks, into MDKFF stock, came to prove to me, in time, that they also knew and know HOW to make money ;)

      Exactly. For those of you who are visually-oriented, A graph

      I think Mandrakesoft knows it's core customers and treats them right. Connectiva could probably have found another bigger fish to latch onto, but probably not one so much inline with the core value of their customer base also.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    13. Re:How? by Moulinneuf · · Score: 0


      "latest quarterly summary"

      Latest = October to December 2004

      Quaterly = 1 quarter

      Summary = What whe ( Jacques Le Marois ,MandrakeSoft ) whant to discuss and report because where not yet on a regulated Market.

      "So you're dead wrong about where their money comes from."

      Actually from this report can you tell me how many MandrakeClub suscriber there is and at what level each of them are ?

      Whats the product sale of say Canada ?
      Whats The product sale of Australia ?

      Whats the service sale of Germany ?
      Whats the service sale of Spain ?

      Whats the Government Sale %.

      Whats the debt repaiment ?
      What are the debt ?

      -----

      "Also, your numbers are slightly off."

      Yes , I will give you that one for the company share value at the present time.

      "that's about 50 million USD."

      actually its 52.7948

      " they're not the size of RedHat but that's one of the reasons I like them."

      Your right and wrong , they are bigger. And have a smaller debt , in 2024 Red Hat as a 500 million debt to repay.

      http://www.redhat.com/about/presscenter/2004/pre ss _convertible.html

      "I don't know where you got the loss figure from but I bought the stock at 2.1 euros. On 4 August 2004"

      http://www.mandrakesoft.com/company/investors/ne ws letter/sn041222

      "Moreno Valley, CA; Paris, France; December 22, 2004. Mandrakesoft closed a 3.05 million euros increase of capital via subscription for 508,333 new shares at 6 euros per share, an increase in shares of 10.58%. Shares outstanding are now 5,312,889"

      "On 4 August 2004, it was 2.39 Euros. It is now 7.60 Euros"

      I have to agree with you , on your own personnal investment based only on the share value increase and when you bought it its an increase.

      I whas writing about when Mandrakesoft actually made its IPO up until now ... It came back to the same level 30-50 million depending on the day.

      -------

      I dont have an opinion about MandrakeSoft , I have too numerous fact and inside report to be an opinion. And I am tottaly biased about seeing them do well.

      Who said I dont like Jacques Le Marois as a person ? He just happen to be a bad Manager at MandrakeSoft at least.

      Dont forget to ask him about HP deals , if its for europe or just france :

      http://www.computerwire.com/industries/research/ ?p id=400F9AB9-A7C5-45FD-BA89-042E03A3FEB3

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    14. Re:How? by Moulinneuf · · Score: 0


      The last link I gave seems problematic :

      http://www.computerwire.com/industries/research/ ?p id=400F9AB9-A7C5-45FD-BA89-042E03A3FEB3

      http://news.linux.com/article.pl?sid=05/02/08/17 36 205&tid=96

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    15. Re:How? by Moulinneuf · · Score: 0


      If the above link dont work search for :

      HP Gives to Mandrake with One Hand

      in google

      --
      I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
    16. Re:How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ABN-AMRO was on of the investers in Mandrakesoft before it went public

    17. Re:How? by legirons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "actually, how how, do they make money by giving their product away for free?"

      They sell their product. For between $30 and $150 per box. And people like me buy it, so they make money.

      It might sound odd to buy something that you can download without charge (or buy CDs for $6), but really that's just a convenient aspect of the distribution mechanism. If I lose my boxed copy of Mandrake, I can make a copy, download, or buy a cheap copy. (Compare that to other operating-systems, where if you so much as change a hard-drive, you have to beg for permission to continue using the OS)

      It might still seem odd to pay when you can freeload, but my opinion of that is that I'm paying for the future availability of Mandrake. (just like I pay for wikipedia even though it's free) -- we're buying the ability for anyone in the world to use the best OS without charge. And that's quite different to paying for just a license.

    18. Re:How? by mixmasta · · Score: 1

      prolly the strong euro lets them buy things in brazil for 1/4 the price.

      --
      #6495ED - cornflower blue
    19. Re:How? by morcego · · Score: 1

      ABN-AMRO was on of the investers in Mandrakesoft before it went public

      And now one wonders how much of the new company ABN-AMRO owns.

      --
      morcego
    20. Re:How? by morcego · · Score: 1

      And there you are wrong.

      Conectiva was NEVER, EVER close to bankrupcy.

      Yes, it was not profitable for most of its existance, but that situation changed some time ago (1 year or so).

      From what I gathered from talking to various people, this is not about saving Conectiva. It is about making MORE money than they do now.

      --
      morcego
    21. Re:How? by morcego · · Score: 1

      Several offices where closed, RJ and BH among others.

      The truth to the issue was that Conectiva was cutting costs to make itself profitable.

      Closing branch offices and doing business using business partness only was one of the things they did.

      I'm not sure I agree 100% with what they did, or their motivation for it, but they are profitable now.

      --
      morcego
    22. Re:How? by opkool · · Score: 1

      not only were they almost bankrupt, they actually were in bankruptcy in the French court system.

      Actualy what MandrakeSoft did was asking for bankrupcy protection, which is different to bankrupcy. With this protection, MandrakeSoft was able to straight up its financial situation, went back to normal and now is profitable again.

      Peace!

    23. Re:How? by opkool · · Score: 1

      The "Euro strength" is only high compared with US Dollar. Compared to other currencies, is not such high.

      It is the US Dollar which is very low compared to Euro. It is not the Euro being very highly priced everywhere else.

      Peace!

  2. Yet? by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    This won't elevate us to the status of Red Hat or Novell/SuSE yet, of course, but this is a significant growth for us...
    So does Mandrakesoft believe that acquisitions and mergers are path to financial growth and success?

    Hrm...sounds familiar...
    --
    www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
    1. Re:Yet? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      And it worked for your example company rather well, didn't it?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Yet? by Wudbaer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Big surprise for you: Almost all larger companies have mergers and aquisitions as part of their growth strategies, some in some periods of their existence even as a sole means of growth. This is neither a secret nor limited to MS.

    3. Re:Yet? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't be so drawn in by the knee-jerk reactions to think that "acquisitions and mergers" are always a bad thing. You buy other companies to gain market share, brands, add to your own line of products and services, etc.

      Such a move is often good for consumers, too. Imagine what would happen if all of the cell phone companies were small, local businesses. Not only would your service be crappy, but support and prices would probably suck too. By combining into a few major players, you get national service, a sturdy support system, and longevity - they're less likely to fold and leave you hanging.

      You don't get to be the richest man in the world by letting your competition win.

    4. Re:Yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you're talking about acquiring companies, not just products, it's probably less true of Microsoft than most companies. And, IIRC, Microsoft has never been through a real merger.

    5. Re:Yet? by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but you hate Microsoft for its business practices, so you can't possibly hope that Mandrake follows in Microsoft's footsteps, right? Anything else would be hypocritical of you, right?

      Oh, wait, forgot where I was for a second.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    6. Re:Yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, I agree with your example in theory. But cell phones are a poor example in my experience. Service is crappy, support and prices suck too.

      For cell companies it's all about new customers. If you're an existing customer you have a longer wait time on hold, get only the crappiest and cheapest choices when you need to upgrade the phone, and the major providers close support centers as they see their chances for growth going down. Longevity? Well, yeah, when they lock you into a two year contract I guess. But then they practically force you to switch providers every couple of years in order to get a decent new phone without paying twice as much as a new customer.

      But I do agree that consolidation is good in some industries.

    7. Re:Yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > You don't get to be the richest man in the world by letting your competition win.

      No, you get there by lying, cheating and stealing - and crating and illegally exploiting monopolies whereever possible.

    8. Re:Yet? by leadsling · · Score: 1
      Novell/SuSE acquisitions and mergers

      I guess Suse threw themselves at the feet of Novell and sai "Take me!! Take me now!!!"

    9. Re:Yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't get to be the richest man in the world by letting your competition win.
      Richest man? You mean Bill Gates? He got there and remains there largely through locking users into overpriced crap. Being the "richest man in the world" shouldn't be the goal here.

    10. Re:Yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your jealousy is hilarious.

    11. Re:Yet? by mordors9 · · Score: 1

      Better than another companies business model, trying to sue your way into financial growth and success.

    12. Re:Yet? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Do I hate Microsoft? I don't remember that.

      I think hating or loving companies who are out to make money no matter what they have to do is just foolish.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    13. Re:Yet? by smeat · · Score: 1


      Lip my stocking, ohh lip my stocking!!
      </Bad Japanese Accent>


      smeat!

      --
      "Let's not bicker about who killed who." Monty Python
    14. Re:Yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, Bill. Nobody gave you permission to speak.

  3. New Name by Conorb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mandrakiva ?

    1. Re:New Name by Elranzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mandriva.... Man-gina Linux?

    2. Re:New Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connecdrake ?

    3. Re:New Name by punkass · · Score: 1

      "That's a huge BitchX!"

      --
      "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
    4. Re:New Name by Donny+Smith · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      > Mandrakiva ?

      Condrake!

    5. Re:New Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's going to be Mandiva -- they'll have Elton John as their spokesperson.

  4. What does MandrakeSoft gain? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not terribly familiar with Conectiva. What does the Mandrake distribution gain with this merger? Just more experienced developers or did Conectiva have certain features that made it attractive? Or are they just combining forces?

    1. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing im aware of is apt-rpm that has come from conectiva.

    2. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by garcia · · Score: 0, Troll

      I would venture to say "not that much". Conectiva was apparently the first Linux distro to cater to countries outside of the US and Europe.

      It was based out of Brazil (which doesn't give it much weight as far as I'm concerned as I wouldn't trust a pile of shit from .br) and won some obscure awards for being the "best OS".

      For a company that recently claimed bankruptcy I just can't see this merger as being fruitful in the future.

    3. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by WindBourne · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Conectiva is big in South America. By merging, they extend their sales base. In addition, each of them have talented individuals on board that will hopefully create an even better OS.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Brazil's government announced earlier this year it was planning to switch 300,000 PCs from Windows to Linux. I don't know if any contracts have been signed already, but I guess it's not unlikely they would favor a distributor based in Brazil (similar to when the city of Munich went with SuSE).

    5. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not terribly familiar with Conectiva. What does the Mandrake distribution gain with this merger? Just more experienced developers or did Conectiva have certain features that made it attractive?

      Well Connectiva were one of the first distributions to embrace apt-rpm (they may even have done a lot of the development work, I can't recall) and provide some of the major development impetus behind Synpatic which is far and away the best GUI package manager around. As far as I am concerned what Mandrake could gain from Connectiva is a move to apt-rpm and Synaptic. I know URPMI has a lot of fans but I think apt and Aynaptic may be the way to go for pakcage management. It helps standardise things as well - all the Debian based distros use apt, and several use Synaptic by default as well, and despite yum being the default apt-rpm and Synaptic is very popular on Fedora, and even SuSE (instead of YaST).

      At the very least I hope Connectiva stays with apt-rpm and Synaptic. I would hate to see them shift to URPMI at this stage.

      Jedidiah.

    6. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by NicolaiBSD · · Score: 5, Informative
      which doesn't give it much weight as far as I'm concerned as I wouldn't trust a pile of shit from .br

      Marcelo Tosatti has been maintaining the 2.4 kernels you've been running for a long time. He's a Brazilian working for Conectiva.

      You on the other hand are an asshole.

    7. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't trust a pile of shit from .br

      What about a pile of shit named Linux kernel 2.4.x?

    8. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would say Mandrake gains a foot hold in Brazil.
      Brazil is a big country. With a lot of resources. Often people in the northern hemisphere forget that that that there is another half of a world. Could they become the Linux of South America?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    9. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      amen

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
    10. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by kernelblaha · · Score: 0

      Right! Brazil is has a BIG uptake of OSS, look. I think Mandrake is making a smart move by getting people who know the terrain (south America) on board as quickly as possible.

      --
      Million dollar sig.
    11. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by stm2 · · Score: 1

      Conectiva have offices and clients in Southamerica, so the gained presence in this region. In Argentina Connectiva was very big because they were the first to market a commercial linux in Spanish as default language. Then they closed offices in Buenos Aires and people migrated to other linuces that also had Spanish version (almost all of them now!). But they are still strong in Brasil.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    12. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Reignking · · Score: 1

      What about Portuguese?

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    13. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by jesuitninja · · Score: 1
      The development of apt-rpm is stalled, afaict, and urpmi's dependency solver is superior to the one of apt (-rpm or not) (being able to solve a wider range of problems.) However apt-rpm is available for mandrakelinux for the weird people who really really want to use it. urpmi is not going to disappear soon. (Moreover it's written in Perl, so it's obviously superior :)

      However the author of apt-rpm is working on a new package manager, smart, which looks very promising, but which is still alpha.

    14. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Brazil is also pro-open source, so having their product helped by the government will help.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    15. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Marcelo Tosatti has been maintaining the 2.4 kernels you've been running for a long time. He's a Brazilian working for Conectiva.

      Actually, he left Conectiva a long time ago

    16. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by combcox · · Score: 0

      As the press release mentions, They gain some market share in the south amerrican region. IMO,Thats more significant than the developer gain. Marcelo Tosatti is there at connectiva. The gains are mutial to both Mandrake and Connectiva

    17. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they're interested in a foothold in the Brazilian market. I would be if I ran a distro company.

      The Brazilians are rabid about free (libré) software and they have a growing economy. Check out Lessig's blog about his trip there.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    18. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by stm2 · · Score: 0

      If you want to succesfully enter in southamercan market, you must put you product both in Portuguese and Spanish. For example, DirectTV has channels in bothlanguages. Brasil is by far the biggest and richer country in the region, but it is the only one where portuguese is spoken, all the rest of the countries in southamerca, the official and onlye spoken language is Spanish. (there are some native people who speak also Quecha in countries like Uruguay but they are a minory).

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    19. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by luciofm · · Score: 0

      "I wouldn't trust a pile of shit from .br"

      Have you heard about Tosatti maintaining the 2.4 kernel, or about the BraSilian goverment that have plans to switch to open source, and producing a sheep popular PC with Linux, or about ACME (another kernel hacker, with a lot of contributions to the kernel), or about the cool FISL (International Free Software Forum) at Porto Alegre.

      Yes there are good stuff comming from BraSil (with S, not Z).

      And just another thing, We don't think that we are better than anyone.

    20. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Otter · · Score: 1

      Or, to put it another way -- how many RPM-based, desktop-oriented, major commercial distributions does the world need?

    21. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by leoboiko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Conectiva made apt-rpm. They also made the smart package manager, which I think is underrated. I hope the Mandrake guys see its potential.

      Conectiva Linux will not exactly shift to urpmi, but instead it will be merged into Mandrake Linux.

      And remember guys, we're called Conectiva, with a single "n".

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    22. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by bryam · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Marcelo works for Cyclades @ Brazil.

    23. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by morcego · · Score: 1

      Actually, the lead developer on apt-rpm was Alfredo Kojuma (from the WindowMaker desktop). The lead developer for smart is Gustavo Niemeyer, which took over the apt-rpm project after Kojima left Conectiva to start his own consulting company (with other Conectiva ex-employers).

      --
      morcego
    24. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by leoboiko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, Lucio, but our country is spelled "Brazil" (and therefore "Brazilians") in English, and this is an English-speaking site. But we have a lot to be proud of from Conectiva, including tosatti, acme, apt-rpm, synaptic, smart, the vesa driver for X...

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    25. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      But of course he was modded up for something that wasn't actually truthful or informative. Welcome to Slashdot.

      At least garcia was right.

    26. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by rednaxel · · Score: 1
      Just talked with some Conectiva's employees on Freenode. Besides the skilled team, Mandrakesoft may be after the LA (Latin America, not Los Angeles) market, where Conectiva has a solid customers base.

      PS: Yes, it is me. ;-)

      --
      If you can read this, thank an english teacher.
    27. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

      You on the other hand are an asshole.

      And they moderate it "informative" and "insightful". Go mods! :)

    28. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by SignificantBit · · Score: 1

      That's depend how do you define "rich country".. by overall PIB or per capita.

    29. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by luciofm · · Score: 0

      I know that, but really don't like to translate names. You don't translate "Marcelo" to "Marcel" or anithing like that, so why translate countries names?

    30. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by xtracto · · Score: 1

      I agree with you, is like those bastards that translate Mejico instead of Mexico . /WTF !!/

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    31. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by andreweb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a note: in Brazil we speak Portuguese, not spanish.... we dont' say "libré" here.... we say "livre"

    32. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, the fine individuals in the 'other half of the world' are constantly running over our borders and into our farms and factories. The exploding Hispanic community !== mexicans.

    33. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it mostly phonological changes from Spanish (Castillian) or does it have significant vocabulary from the Celts who lived in that region and in Galicia, in Roman times?

    34. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

      I've been using Conectiva more than 5 years, it's a very intuitive distribution that has facilities for both, desktop users and server users. But what is very useful is that we have a lot of people maintaining and suggesting new things to be in the next version like "apt-get" and some hardware configuration tools, you can find a dealer of support here in Brazil in the big cities and some medium cities too.

    35. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by leoboiko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you know the names of all countries of the world in their own languages? Can you write and pronounce them all? Most Brazilians wouldn't be able to pronounce "United States of America" or "Nippon" or "Ukrayina" or "Bundesrepublik Deutschland", and they should not be required to. In fact, on slashdot I can't even input the cyrillic and kanji characters I'd need above. What we call "China" is Zhongguo, written with ideographic hanzi, and Chinese has five different vowel intonations; want to give a try at pronouncing or writing it?

      Each language has its own idiosyncrasies. People shouldn't be required to learn the writing, spelling and pronounciation conventions of other languages, even for country names.

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    36. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by ventonegro · · Score: 1

      The Lua programming language is elegant, small, fast, powerful and easy to embed. It's currently the #1 scripting language for games, and it's developed in Brazil.

      I don't know why you wouldn't trust anything that comes from here.

      --
      -- "Usefulness arises from what is not there" - Daoism saying
    37. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as I wouldn't trust a pile of shit from .br

      Mandrakesoft is French and real men obviously won't trust anything from French weasels. Right?

    38. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by michelcultivo · · Score: 1

      No, Marcelo Tosatti is working at Cyclades now.

    39. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by morcego · · Score: 1

      I define it was in how much money the govenment has that a company can take.

      I think that is pretty how much every company defines it.

      --
      morcego
    40. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Simon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What does the Mandrake distribution gain with this merger?

      As far as I am concerned what Mandrake could gain from Connectiva is a move to apt-rpm and Synaptic.

      huh? Mandrake can move to apt-rpm and Synaptic any time they want. They don't have to merge with Conectiva to do that! It's Free Software after all.

      The merger has got little to do with software and technical features, and everything to do with getting entry to South American markets.

      Besides, both are heading towards the SMART package manager.

      --
      Simon

    41. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by orasio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guy hit two out of three.

      Marcelo works in Brasil. Hit.
      Marcelo doesn't work for Conectiva anymore. Miss.
      garcia is an asshole. Hit.

      That's enough "informative" for me.

    42. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a bleeding edge man apparently.

    43. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knock off the obvious astroturfing, garcia. It's getting old.

    44. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1

      Doesn't rpm handle all the dependency management anyhow? I was under the impression that apt-rpm and urpmi are just front-ends and that back-ends like rpm and dpkg manage dependencies.

    45. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Brazilian government will probably go with IBM or other huge IT services provider because of the size of the demand. Don't forget selling free software is not about selling boxes but selling support. They may, of course, decide to go with Conectiva's distro for political reasons.

    46. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by morcego · · Score: 2

      Neither dpkg or rpm can solve dependencies, unfortunately. They will point the dependencies, but not solve them.

      That is why urpm/apt/smart are needed.

      --
      morcego
    47. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Acer500 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mistook Paraguay for Uruguay (a fairly common mistake, but I'm from Uruguay so I should know).

      Yes, the name of the country is in native language, but the brother one of the first Presidents slaughtered all of our Indians - Uruguay and Costa Rica are about the only American countries without natives.

      Back on topic, I'd say that buying Conectiva is a smart move, because Linux capitalizes on the anti-American (and anti-Microsoft) feeling that the current left wing presidents share, so it wouldn't be strange if the local governments switched to Linux (aided by Conectiva or whatever Linux support there is).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    48. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Is it mostly phonological changes from Spanish (Castillian) or does it have significant vocabulary from the Celts who lived in that region and in Galicia, in Roman times?

      You start from a false assumption: that portuguese can be viewed and analysed by changes "from" castillian (AKA "spanish"). Portuguese, or Galaico-portuguese, was the literary and cultural language in the Iberian peninsula even before Castille started to gain political influence amonsts the other Iberian "nations" that nowadays constitute Spain. There are similarities, of course, due to the common latin background and proximity, but the vocabulary is different, the grammar is different, and the pronunciation is *entirely* different.

      As from the celtic angle, it's hard to say. Everything related to the Celts has been so overdone that one never knows when to believe things. The ammount of celtic and germanic words in portuguese is higher than is castillian, which has a higher number of arabic words. Do note that portuguese also as many arabic inspired words. I stress this because there seems to be a trend in considering indo-european influences as "pure" and e.g. arabic ones as "unpure". Pure nonsense, of course.

      The difference between languages is somewhat similar to the Dutch/German one, with perhaps a slighly larger degree of separation. Portuguese was also influenced by Occitanic spelling, whereas spanish wasn't. As a matter of fact, pronunciation wise, portuguese is much closer to catalan than to castillian.

      Also, it's different when talking about European portuguese or Brazilian portuguese, since especially the pronunciation is different (the brazilian one tends to be "clearer", more open vowels, etc). There is also galician "situation", which I wount comment because it usually brings up a lot of strong opinions and old feelings. Let it suffice to say that, while traditionally Galician and Portuguese are the same language, if the current state of affairs in Galiza education-wise continues Galician will drift apart for good and become a distinct, portugese/castillian hybrid of sort. Which is a shame IMHO.

      The African portuguese usually follows European portuguese in grammar and vocabulary, enriched with lots of local additions of course. Also, in Asia, there are plenty of portuguese-speaking communities, or at least "portuguese creole" speaking communities. Which is surprising, considering the investment that we (Portugal and Brazil, the two countries that could actually make a difference) make in the promotion of our language worldwide: around 1/100 of what would be acceptable to be even considered an effort.

      Sic transit gloria mundi...

    49. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by garcia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Knock off the obvious bullshit Anonymous Pussy, it's getting old.

    50. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Just a note: in Brazil we speak Portuguese, not spanish.... we dont' say "libré" here.... we say "livre"

      Point taken, but you're on an English board. :) We say libré because we have no word for free-as-in-freedom aside from 'free' which usually means 'gratis', I wasn't trying to put words in the mouthes of the Brazillians.

      I hadn't realized it was borrowed from Spanish; I assumed it was Latin, but it looks like that's 'liber'. I invite the classics majors to jump in now and provide all the relevant conjugations.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    51. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      I am a native English speaker that has had a couple of years of Spanish (and a year each of French and Latin), and I usually can puzzle out Portuguese, if I know the Spanish word. Spanish and Portuguese are remarkably similiar. They even sound similiar, but I am comparing Mexican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese. Mexican and Castillan Spanish are very different accents.

      My grandfather was a native Dutch speaker, and in talks with native Belgians and Germans, the impression I get is that Dutch and German are a bit more different.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    52. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      I am a native English speaker that has had a couple of years of Spanish (and a year each of French and Latin), and I usually can puzzle out Portuguese, if I know the Spanish word. The vocabulary *is* similar, I,as portuguese, can usually understand up to 90%, with different degrees of effort, of castillian. As normal in this situations the opposite is not so true (e.g. my Dutch friends tell me that they can understand German better than the other way around). Also, since you are learing the language, you are more prone to detect patterns, contexts, and similar vocabularies. I can usually detect the french roots in english much more quickly than, say, americans.

      Spanish and Portuguese are remarkably similiar. They even sound similiar, but I am comparing Mexican Spanish and Brazilian Portuguese.

      Well, there is also another thing to consider: to a foreign, and speaking only of verbalised communication, related languages sound pretty much the same. I know that personally I mix up Swedish, Norwegian and Danish. I can even mix up Finnish with the previous ones, and Finnish has a totally different root. Add to that the fact that the pronunciation of Brazilian portuguese and of Mexican castillian are closer than the Iberian counterparts and you will easily mix up the languages. I still maintain though, and from people with a similar experience as you, that the two languages are actually easily recognisable.

      Mexican and Castillan Spanish are very different accents.

      Well, following what I said above, I don't detect a sharp distinction between them. I do however easily detect it between iberian and south-american portuguese.

      My grandfather was a native Dutch speaker, and in talks with native Belgians and Germans, the impression I get is that Dutch and German are a bit more different. I initially mixed up the two quite a lot. Stupid, I know, because they are different, but as I said it's easier to think that the "others" are similar. The flemmish Belgians should be quite similar to the Dutch I think, if not only superficially different. The impression *I* get is that Dutch and German are more similar than Portuguese and Spanish. I am however subject to the same rules, so my view is probably tainted as well.

      The Romans termed "barbarians" all of those that didn't speak latin. To them, all the other peoples in Europe talked the same :)

    53. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Connectiva is probably the most professional Linux distribution established in Brazil, with some participation in other South American countries.

      It is said Connectiva has (i) more than 1 million system installed (??? - difficult to check ); (ii) has already trained more than 15,000 people with their Linux courses; and (iii) that it has at least 100 major enterprise (big companies) contracts.

      Not to mention Brazil's government willingness to migrate their desktops to Linux...

      It could be a very good start into entering the Latin American market...

    54. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by dcrocha · · Score: 1

      I'm from Brazil. No contracts have been signet yet until now, and this so-called "plan" is nothing more than intentions at the moment. Even if this become true (which I doubt, because the current left-wing government here likes to promise to the people a *lot* of things that it won't do), it will be probably held either by a big company like IBM or the state-run Cobra Tecnologia, which, by the way, is one of the most corrupt companies in the country. Don't expect any benefit to Linux community from this eventual migration. I don't think Conectiva was ever taken into consideration for that job, because even here nobody has seen a new important installation of Conectiva Linux in years.

    55. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by stm2 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the mistake. You are right, Tabare, Lula, Oviedo and Kirschner will push against MS. But I still not sure if they will do it expecting to get a nice "return" from MS or they really care about it.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    56. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Mana+Mana · · Score: 1
      [Conectiva provides entree] to South American markets.

      Aside from Brasilian Portugues, where precisely are the Castillian (spanish, for the laymen) box sets for sale off the .br or .com Conectiva sites?

      They're supposed to dominate the South American market (overwhelmingly spanish parlante) with their wares, but several months ago I went searching for a box set (or an ftp site of same) for some spanish language friends and I could not find anything geared toward a spanish speaker. WTF.

      Brasil is not South America. If it's there, somewhere poking around both sites, and googling fiercely yielded nothing.

    57. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by ReinoutS · · Score: 1

      I thought the Mandrakelinux graphical package management tools weren't so great UI-wise, but my god, judging from the screenshots, SMART could really use some HIG love!

    58. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Adartse.Liminality · · Score: 0

      I inform you that in spanish, "Libre" (which btw isn't exactly gratis see below) doesn't have any accent, if you add that accent, then is a conjugation of the verb "librar" in past tense, so "libré" actually means "I fought".

      fue duro pero [libré] y gane mis batallas
      it was thought but I [fought] and won my battles

      For clarification: libre is like freedom, no strings attached,i.e. your will is the limit, whereas gratis o gratuito means simply "without cost".

      so say libre not libré.
      Native spanish speaker(Mexican).

      --
      Smokin' & rubying away
    59. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by FatTux · · Score: 1
      I'm sure MandrakeSoft knows Brazil is not South America. As did Conectiva, before they almost flopped and had to undercut assets and retreat from the Spanish-speaking markets in South America.

      As Conectiva regained some strength and could walk over its legs again, it became an interesting starting point to MDK in South America.

      With the merger and renewed strength, one can expect that localized websites/products/services in Spanish langage will be produced again.

      Cheers.

    60. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they should.

    61. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? can you dignify us with an explicitation of your valuable insight that moved you to post a sound "Yes!", A.C. style no less?

    62. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes there are good stuff comming from BraSil (with S, not Z).

      And there is bad stuff coming out of here too, like you!

      Well, like parents, guess you don't get to pick your "countrymates"...

    63. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      so say libre not libré.
      Native spanish speaker(Mexican).


      Gracias. :)

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. Re:From the press release: by Conorb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With Suse now an American brand (Novell) I think they might just be the number one European Linux company

  6. Re:From the press release: by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 0

    A paying troll?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  7. Re:From the press release: by reddazz · · Score: 1

    Well Suse isn't European anymore, so I guess Mandrake can somehow claim this "title".

  8. Re:From the press release: by Emporerx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know about Europe, but I thoroughly enjoy Mandrake. I'm wondering what, if any, effect this is going to have on future releases.
    I'm biased because Mandrake really got me into the linux field and away from Micro$oft products. And linux has made computing fun to me again, which has not been the case for some years now.
    I say, if they are trying to make things a little more uniform with these sorts of mergers(software, releases, security) then yay for them. Let's see how it turns out.

  9. Simple... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    The 2.3 million was only $1.75 in cash. The rest was in a stock swap valued at 2.3 million. Valued by who, I have no idea...

  10. Novell/SuSE by gremlins · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do you think they are going to be the big Linux desktop of the future? I mean Redhat does have the name that everyone knows as linux. However Novell has slowly been buying all the cool linux desktop stuff. They bought Xandros and Suse and those are two huge players in the Linux Desktop market.

    --
    just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
    1. Re:Novell/SuSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They bought Ximian, not Xandros.

    2. Re:Novell/SuSE by Wudbaer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Novell bought Ximian, not Xandros. Also cool stuff but different company. :-) Or did I miss something ?

    3. Re:Novell/SuSE by gremlins · · Score: 1

      Tomato tomato

      note to self: do not post slashdot comment untill had first cup of coffee.

      --
      just because your a schizophrenic doesn't mean people arn't really out to get you
  11. Mandrakesoft promptly by AbbyNormal · · Score: 1, Funny

    surrenders to Conectiva and raises a white flag.

    --
    Sig it.
  12. Uh oh... by yuckysocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    MandrakeSoft, why, you could abbreviate that MS. And MS is aquiring companies and getting bigger?
    I think I just felt my knee jerk a little bit...

    *Runs for the hills*

  13. Been with Mandrake for years by kbahey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Being a Mandrake user for several years, I am happy to see that they overcame their financial difficulties and are in a position to expand.

    Apart from the botched 9.2 upgrade debacle, they have a distro that I can use for a Linux home network without spending too much time on it. I have four machines running Linux at home, and don't want to spend a lot of time on each configuring it.

    They are also familiar and friendly enough for my kids to use it as their only desktop. They get to play their MP3, use FireFox or Konqueror, use Open Office for homework, ...etc.

    Moreover, it is also perfectly good as a server for LAMP, Samba, ...etc.

    Go Mandrake!

    1. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by SunPin · · Score: 1
      Being a Mandrake user for several years, I am happy to see that they overcame their financial difficulties and are in a position to expand.

      If you were an investor, your opinion would be different. They bought free code. Brilliant.

      --
      Laws are for people with no friends.
    2. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Silly. Their stock value is increasing. I had bought some stock. If I did it, it is BECAUSE they respect free software, develop free software, and have their revenue on service, not code. I would not invest in a company that use proprietary software to lock their customers. This is called ethics.

    3. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by isotropique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mandrake is a company from France. They put a lot of efforts to document and translate Linux applications in french for their own market. I think their acquisition of Conectiva follows the same logic. Portuguese speaking people should be pleased by the announcement since it means more applications will be available in their own language.

      I'm from Quebec and my primary language is French. I do not use Mandrake Linux but I feel their implication in the Linux movement improved my own experience. Vive Mandrake!

    4. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by kbahey · · Score: 1

      I am not an investor, just a happy user.

      Regarding "they bought free code", I think it is not what this is about. My guess would be that they bought a brand, marketshare, geographical penetration, and minshare.

    5. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I would not invest in a company that use proprietary software to lock their customers. This is called ethics.

      "Ethics" means, essentially, "value system" or "code of conduct." We all have them - the question is whether your ethics are in line with someone else's ethics. What is wrong with a company making something proprietary if that allows them succeed, reward the people who put up money to form the company, pay the people who work for the company, and (most importantly) take care of a need that paying customers are willing to spend money on? If no one wanted to buy a company's proprietary solution, they would be out of business. So, where are the good/bad ethics, here?

      When there's no force and no fraud, everyone involved in such an arrangement (software publisher, and software buyer) is in it mutually, and it is mutually beneficial. Many companies make specialized software so good that it doesn't need any "service" (as you put it), or at least certainly not enough to sustain the publisher (which is why Mandrake almost died). If they don't make enough money on service, and (if we were to use your "ethics") should not make any on the software they produce... who feeds the programmers writing the software? Where does the staff's health care come from? How does the company grow? I'm guessing that your answer will be: The State Takes Care Of All Of That. But of course, that requires taxes, and if no one is selling anything, where do the taxes come from?

      Socialism may be an ethic, but it usually does a crappy job of motivating truly innovative groups of people to take risks and make shiny new things. It's an ethic, but it's a lousy one (um, unless you're lazy, of course, or unable/unwilling to innovate and compete).

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by Pionar · · Score: 1

      No, if you actually RTFPR (press release), you'd see that Connectiva had $2.2 million in revenue last fiscal year and broke even. And with big customers like the Brazilian army, they're in a good position to turn a profit this year.

      Mandrake made a good power move into the South American Linux market with the market leader, dipshit.

    7. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Mandrake through paid developers and volunteers, puts a lot of effort in localization.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  14. Re:From the press release: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can someone explain what is the value of such a potential "title"? Outside of specific american/european attributes in a distro (conversions/formats/whatnot), I don't care for a title. I just want the best possible distro I can get. Afterall, the source to all the damn software packages come from around the world anyways. I hate the notions of "nationality" being attributed to software that's supposed to be free (as in beer, of course).

  15. Re:From the press release: by Folmer · · Score: 1

    That depends on how you see it.. they are still based and registered in germany according to their contact page: http://www.suse.com/en/company/suse/contact/

  16. Growth Paths by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    It may not be *THE* path, but it is *A* path..

    Its also in vogue these days..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  17. merge? by spoonyfork · · Score: 0, Troll

    There is no such thing as a "merge" except maybe in investorspeak. One company buys another, that's it.

    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:merge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      merger

      A combination of two or more companies in which the assets and liabilities of the selling firm(s) are absorbed by the buying firm. Although the buying firm may be a considerably different organization after the merger, it retains its original identity. Compare consolidation. See also downstream merger, synergy.

  18. mandrake has money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow...I did not know that geoff "mandrake" harrison had that kind of cash....wow I should ask him for some money next time

  19. No mucho? by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    I don't know how a majority share buy actually affects this, but might the exposure to a large, spanish speaking user/developer base be worth anything, even if in a less-than-tangible way?

    First thing I see is market. Think South America is interested in cheap software? I'd guess they are.

    Exposure, due to the connection, and perhaps a stronger documentation/application translator force. Mandrake (eventually) saves the Connectiva platform with a buyout (or maybe it just doesn't die), offering Mandrake as a 'prosumer' distro through existing channels and Connectiva contact pages - maybe multimedia centric or something, and grabs some of the technology and/or userbase as their own as they grab some people to translate their documentation and desktop.

    Mandrake will also retain any devoted Connectiva "customers" and perhaps offer up some parts of their distro as enhancements, and use their experience finding their way out of bankrupcy to help those a hemisphere away to do the same, increasing the worth of their own investment.

    What do you think?

    1. Re:No mucho? by morcego · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let me clear some misconceptions on your post.

      First, the majority of Conectiva users speak portugues, not spanish. I would guess at least 70% of the user base is in Brazil.

      Second, Conectiva has been profitable for some time now, so this won't be exactly saving the Conectiva platform, as if it were dying.

      Conectiva has some big corporate customers, including several banks. One of them is even using Conectiva Linux on their ATM machine. So I really don't understand why you wrote "customers" (using quotation marks).

      Also, it is Conectiva, with just 1 N. Not Connectiva.

      About what I think, is that people should do their homework before posting. Then again, this IS slashdot.

      --
      morcego
  20. Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by joestar · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the PR: "Mandrakesoft, founded in 1998, is the internationally recognized number one European Linux company. Mandrakesoft has built its business by designing and delivering user-friendly Linux products to both individuals and businesses, building a user base of more than 4 million users. In its latest fiscal year, Mandrakesoft's revenues reached 5.18 million EUR (6.7 million USD) for a net income of 1.39 million EUR (1.8 million USD)."

    1. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Monkelectric · · Score: 1
      1.8 Million USD is "Very" profitable? What planet are you from? 1.8 milion could buy a couple nice computers at a "very profitable" company :)

      I wanted to look up their stock stats but yahoo finance doesn't have them. Anyone know how many outstanding shares Mandrake has?

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by ReinoutS · · Score: 1
      I wanted to look up their stock stats but yahoo finance doesn't have them
      But they do, Mandrakesoft's web site links here.
    3. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Raumkraut · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are on Yahoo finance - their symbol is "make.pa"

    4. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by joestar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do the ratio: 1.8 income / 6.7 revenues = 26.8%. Quite efficient.

    5. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a software company should be able to enjoy a 70% margin, not a 30% as seen here. Thats a lot of overhead somewhere in the company.

    6. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably has something to do with the fact that they give their software away? If everyone using Manduck were paying 150$ like they do for Windows, I bet they'd have those nice 70% margins too.

    7. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Gallowglass · · Score: 1

      Well that means that profit is about 27% of gross revenues. That doesn't seem too shabby.

      Oh!, Oh, I see. You weren't talking about profitability. You were talking about quantity. Not quite the same thing, ducks.

    8. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No company should enjoy a 70% margin in anything similar to a free market.

  21. The *real* question is... by joestar · · Score: 1

    Will the resulting Linux distribution use apt-rpm or urpmi?

    1. Re:The *real* question is... by morcego · · Score: 1

      Good change it will be neither. Odds point toward smart.

      --
      morcego
    2. Re:The *real* question is... by Jason+Hood · · Score: 1

      Lets hope not, To me that is like polishing several turds all at once (except apt maybe).

      Start over, please.

      --
      Are you intolerant of intolerant people?
  22. and it wouldn't bother me a bit... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ....if all the two thousand whatever debian based distros decided to combine forces and release a reasonably priced and quite functional product either. There's a variety of smaller ones that have at least a modicum of support, but they are all different and some work with this or that, others not. It's just too fragmented at that level., All of them just slightly different, but none of them that I have seen so far (no idea how many distros there are and make no claims to have tried them all of course) meets the joe non programer non guru consumer taste test. I know I have the "choice" in it, just I don't have a "choice" to get anything that isn't betaware for all practical purposes.

    And I don't think this will get any better until a few of the larger vendors put some kind/brand linux on those machines they sell and are as common as xp is on the shelf, or at least *visible* on the shelf. That's when we will start to see a useability "standard" of sorts. It's really up to the box vendors.

  23. Kicking MS out of the 5th largest country? by gelfling · · Score: 4, Funny

    What with the Brazilian government wanting to kick MS off all government desktops, the fact that a disproportionate number of distros come from Brazil & it's the 5th most populous country in the world I'd say it's somewhat strategic in nature for Mandrake to do this.

    1. Re:Kicking MS out of the 5th largest country? by DFJA · · Score: 1

      I think for this reason it is an extremely smart move of Mandrakesoft. It gives them prime access to a huge market that previously they were a much smaller player in.

      --
      43 - For those who require slightly more than the answer to life, the universe and everything.
    2. Re:Kicking MS out of the 5th largest country? by Cyberhawk · · Score: 1

      Still don't get /. moderation.

      What is funny about parent's post? He is absolutely right in his point, and justifies it.

      C'mon people.

  24. Sounds health food supplement. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  25. Re:Mandrake support level? by ajs318 · · Score: 1

    Put down the crack pipe. The "49.7 days" bug you mention was manifested in Windows 95 {49.7 days is about 2**32 milliseconds}. It may also be present in 98 and ME; at any event, it's a rare event indeed for a Windows box to stay up long enough to be affected. I have seen, with my own eyes, Linux boxes with a two-year uptime.

    Your ISP probably runs Linux, so why not ask them?

    --
    Je fume. Tu fumes. Nous fûmes!
  26. Re:From the press release: by AkaXakA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As if Suse, being based in Germany suddenly don't count anymore now they've been bought by (the American) Novel.

    Actually, after this merger, only Red Hat of all the big distro's is still on it's own.

    I wonder how long that'll last. Then again, who's left to buy them?

  27. 2.3 million is nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the US, if all you got for your company is 2.3 million, it's either under 5 people or a failure.

  28. Re:Mandrake support level? by jr87 · · Score: 1

    umm..it will reset uptime...but it won't do the crash thing, at least it shouldn't anymore...

  29. Right, the whole -continent- is Huy Brasil. ;-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, the whole -continent- is Huy Brasil. ;-)

  30. Re:Mandrakesoft promptly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Wait a cotton-picking minute! That is offensive! They waited until a conectivia guy made his way to France before surrendering! The trouble is that they have given up to so many other people first.

    Now they can go to some other defenseless place like the Ivory Coast and shoot more unarmed civilians in cold blood. Then criticize the US more for enforcing the UN resolutions that were ignored for a decade or so. Even ignore unanimous international findings that Iraq had WMD's including the ones destroyed just days before the war.

    Yup, they are yellow. Hey Germany, take over France again. Absorb them into a new Germany. Nobody will miss them I'm sad to say.

  31. Re:From the press release: by morcego · · Score: 1

    I'm particularly concerned about future releases myself, since my company is all based on Conectiva Linux.

    Conectiva has been working on their Conectiva Linux 11 product for some time now. So, I think (hope) at they will go at least that far. After that, it is anyone's guess.

    --
    morcego
  32. Re:From the press release: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IBM?

  33. Heart attack averted by cianduffy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looking quickly at this story in my RSS reader, I saw "Microsoft acquires Connectiva"....

    1. Re:Heart attack averted by morcego · · Score: 1

      A united Mandrake+Conectiva distribution would be the prime target for Microsoft aquisition if they were out for it.

      So you may not be that far from the mark there.

      --
      morcego
  34. Re:From the press release: by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    Can someone explain what is the value of such a potential "title"?

    It tells people you're not American. With the current situation in the US with regards to IP legislation, that's worth a bundle.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  35. Re:Mandrakesoft promptly.....actually.... by Chineseyes · · Score: 0, Troll

    it should be Suse rolls into town and Madrakesoft promptly waves white flags welcoming Suse into Paris.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  36. Re:Mandrake support level? by morcego · · Score: 1

    I have several machines with more than 6 months uptime. I used to have a machine with 2 years uptime when running RedHat 3.0.3 (kernel 1.0.33 ? Something like that).

    What is your point, exactly ?

    --
    morcego
  37. Re:How many people fired ? by morcego · · Score: 1

    Considering Conectiva used to have 200+ employees when I used to work there, and it has around 60 now, I don't know how many they can still fire while keeping their doors open.

    No idea on the Mandrake side, tho.

    --
    morcego
  38. Novell/SuSE vs Mandrakelinux & Connective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ehm, no Novell did not acquire Xandros AFAIK. And furthermore, I have some experience with Novell Linux Desktop 9, and personally I think it has been hyped too much by commercial people. I did not find it too stable, it is missing a lot of useful software, and from a technical point of view, does not seem to have real added value to other distro's. Yes, there should be the support, but I have good experience with the community support from a distro as Mandrakelinux, and at least behind the first line support, for a lot of things Novell also depends from the community for fixing bugs, so I'm not sure it is really an advantage.

    I'm happily staying with Mandrakelinux, and as Connectiva also seems a nice distro with some good developers, I am happy to hear the news. I'm confident these two companies won't become a commercial giant like Novell, but the merger will certainly give them some more visibility and credibility in businesses.

  39. NEWSFLASH by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 0

    Acquisitions and mergers HAVE worked for Microsoft.

    So...what the fuck? You guys are "disagreeing" with me by re-iterating and expanding upon the point I made? Mandrakesoft apparently thinks this "corporate strategy" is the way to go, a strategy employed by many successful companies such as Microsoft. Microsoft, as far as I know, has the biggest cash reserve of any company. So yeah. It worked for Microsoft. Thanks.

    --
    www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
  40. Thank you. by QuietRiot · · Score: 1

    More homework next time. More homework....

    My bad. Myself, and others I'm sure, appreciate your reply. Thank you for clearing me up and not letting my uninformed dialog go read by others unchecked.

    I've heard nothing but good things about the distribution.

    Do you think the purchase is healthy for Connectiva and/or Mandrake?

    1. Re:Thank you. by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure it is very good for Mandrake, for the reasons already posted by several others here (mostly the brazilian government). And it will come pretty cheap for them, all things considered. If they invested that kind of money in comercial operations in Brazil (marketing, offices etc), they would not be able to get 10% of the market they are getting this way.

      For Conectiva, I'm afraid to guess.

      Conectiva turned into a profitable company mostly by firing employees and closing offices. That is what you get when you have a bank as the major shareholder of a company. Also, a good share of the technical ex-employees left on their own, instead of being fired, and opened their own companies. From that, you can see how much potential market was there. As far as I know, all those companies are profitable (although they are much smaller than Conectiva).

      When RedHat opened their office here in Brazil, it was maned almost entirely by people that have left Conectiva.

      On the other hand, I always considered Conectiva Linux technicaly more advanced than Mandrake.

      So, IMHO, if we can join Conectiva's technical expertise, with Mandrake's comercial expertise, we might end up with a very nice company.

      I have tried contacting a couple of Conectiva founders (board members) since I've heard of this. Got no answer so far, which is probably to be expected.

      --
      morcego
    2. Re:Thank you. by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just as an extra note, we don't know where this shares are coming from.

      Are their the shares still held by the original founders, or are they the shares that ABN-Amro Bank held ?

      If their are the shares held by the original founders, one has to guess how many shares of Mandrake are held by ABN, and if this is some kind of twisted move from ABN to get a hold of Mandrake too.

      --
      morcego
  41. Re:From the press release: by morcego · · Score: 1

    I just got some confirmation from Conectiva that they will be merging their products, even before the next release of Conectiva Linux (11).

    From that, one can imagine they will start merging their linux distributions almost imediately.

    --
    morcego
  42. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  43. Re:From the press release: by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

    Sure, I thought of IBM too, but IBM never really bets on one horse. This is why they're happy to offer both Suse and Red Hat on their servers.

  44. Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised to hear about this because I, too, thought Mandrake was knocked out. They were going through some financial troubles awhile back--this has already been mentioned. At the time, I was using Mandrake 9.2 and was having a good time of it. Outside of butchering the apache configuration as a learning experience, it's administrative tools took care of everything.

    I guess a distro is only as good as the hard disk it sits on, and I discovered it was on a DeskStar . . . when it died. I put an install of Mandrake 10 on drive it was RMA'd and returned. This didn't seem to be a very mature OS. I couldn't choose what to install, and later found out it didn't include gcc. I installed that only to find it couldn't successfully compile anything! I've since switched to SuSE at home bceause that's what we use at work. While that had its own problems, most of it would have to be blamed on my home CD-burner dying (bad luck lately).

    I hear there's a community edition ISO along with something else. Whatever I got might have been the junkier of the two. Either way, it left a very sour impression. I'm surprised they're still conducting business, but the best of luck to them.

    --
    No I'm not trolling.
    1. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Cap'n+Steve · · Score: 1

      Maybe a lot's changed, but I'm a linux newbie with 10.1 community edition on my laptop. I was able to choose in great detail what I wanted to install and I've even managed to compile a couple things. I thought Mandrake was known for the quality of it's installation system.

    2. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what you mean. In mandrake 10 it allows you to pick what software you want to install, just have to a check the box with that option. Mandrake has always included gcc, you just check the development tools box in the install.

    3. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It is known for it's easy installation system. The grandparent probably installed with only the first cd, which while it will instal a decent desktop, does not provide all the packages that the 3 or 4 or 5 or 6 or 7 or dvd sets will provide.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    4. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where've you been? Around that time, most distros were having some growing pains. There have been some major architectural changes in how a Gnu/Linux desktop box works. Mandrake and Fedora, being among the most progressive distros, went through a lot of difficult changes.

    5. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      I couldn't choose what to install, and later found out it didn't include gcc. I installed that only to find it couldn't successfully compile anything!

      The only version of Mandrake that doesn't include compilers is the Discovery Edition, which is not avialable for download. But, even on Discovery, you can use online urpmi repositories to install any software you like.

      Since this seems to be your main argument, the rest of your post is really invalid.

      Please try a bit better with your next troll.

    6. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by infolib · · Score: 1
      There have been some major architectural changes in how a Gnu/Linux desktop box works.

      Just out of curiosity, could you name a few of the major ones? (I've been running Linux, mostly mdk, since '99, but my involvement in the nuts and bolts of my distro has been rather on-and-off).

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    7. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1
      There was the switch from XFree86 to xorg, the switch to the 2.6 kernel, the switch from the old-school /dev system to DevFSD and then to UDEV, and the introduction of the hotplug system. CUPS has been evolving quite a bit, with huge numbers of new drivers and graphical interfaces to support desktop use. Xorg has changed a lot even over the relatively short period since its inception; in the first few months there were dozens of major patches introducing new modules. The X font system has changed substantially (I think the font system has been replaced twice now, but I wouldn't swear to it). Fedora had it's VERY painful transition to SELinux, although I think they've worked through the problems (I'm a Mandrake man myself, so I'm only peripherally aware of Fedora's evolution). A lot of software had to changed to support Alsa instead of OSS. The GStreamer framework was introduced, and many media-streaming applications migrated it.

      Plus of course, all the normal evolutionary stuff, like new versions of Gnome and KDE, more internationalization, more graphical utilities.

      Most importantly, many major applications like Xine and Quake2 were ported to AALib, allowing them to enjoyed on God's chosen peripheral, the ASCII terminal.

    8. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 1

      It must have been the Discovery Edition. I don't have the CDs with me to verify.

      --
      No I'm not trolling.
    9. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by infolib · · Score: 1

      Ok, thanks :-) I've been aware of some of this stuff, but the big picture of change didn't really register on me. Happy draking!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    10. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

      It's a testament to the robustness of the GNU/Linux desktop that most of this stuff was pretty behind-the-scenes for users.

  45. Sofware is about services. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Anyone that still believes it is about buying and selling code is compltetely deluded.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  46. Profitability is not measured in absolute numbers. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    The revenue and the earnins should give you a clue at how good they are making money.

    A company investing 1000000 and arning 900000 is crap (putting all this out of any context).

    Another one investing 10000 and making 20000 is much more profitable.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  47. Fucking services. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why o why people keep asking the same stupid question?

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Fucking services. by new_confused_mind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      HA! I think I got your nick: JLMS. You are brazilian right?

  48. Re:From the press release: by clymere · · Score: 1
    IBM representatives have repeatedly stated that they have no interest in owning any one distro.

    among other things, they don't think anyone would actually use "IBM's Linux" because of image issues. They want to make money from support anyways, it works well to be distro-neutral.

    --
    once you go slack, you never go back
  49. Re:What are you talking about ? by KingBahamut · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats a misconception, not every Linux developed app is Free or Open Sourced. There are many closed liscence/Proprietary Liscenced applications. Dont be so asinine as to make such a broad statement as

    "All software that comes on every distro is free"

    Thats a large idiot speaking. If you ever want to legitimize the business you have to follow certain business level practices to be successful. While open sourcing is good, ultimately in the end, someone has to pay out the cash to support it. Why is RedHat so successful and still able to make money. Otherwise why would they charge you 2500$ for RH Enterprise AS.

    Take your beans, and while your at it, Tell Redhat, Novell, Mandrake, Lycoris, Linare, Libranet, Xandros, and those other Dists that are actually trying to market themselves to make money to take their products off the shelf because its useless to sell something thats free.

    Go home 12yo......come back grasshoppa when you have learned something.

    --
    "God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
  50. Nice merge ... by wagner_bila · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, i have Mandrake Community 10.1 installed on my linux box (my notebook) and i always heard good things about Conectiva and its developers. Since i'm also brazilian, i feel very greatful with the fusion ... i think some good products can be build now on with this merge. Also Brazil has a strong movement to the open source software and the open source initiative and also has a great potential to grow too ...

  51. Re:What are you talking about ? by thehunger · · Score: 1

    WHY did they buy SuSE?! It was a strategic aquisition that rescued Novell from obscurity. From hardly being mentioned at all, Novell now gets A LOT of media attention.That alone was worth the price - now suddenly they have an audience when they talk about their identity management and enterprise management software. They are perceived as being the most interesting Linux company - precisely because they have a great software stack that can be combined with Linux. Also, when they bought SuSE they didn't just buy Linux. They got a company with engineers and skills. With a brand name. You didn't think all that was downloadable from the net, did you?

  52. Re:What are you talking about ? by KingBahamut · · Score: 1

    I have to aggree with hunger on this issue. Its common sense.

    --
    "God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
  53. YUM and Fedora, APT and Connectiva, URPMI and Mand by hduff · · Score: 1

    YUM is written in Python as are Fedora's Fedora-centric tools and installer, so that makes sense. Urpmi is written in Perl as are Madrakre's installer and tools, so that makes sense as well. Apt for RPM is still a hack of the code written for .deb's, Synaptic is just a GUI interface for APT like rpmdrake is a GUI interface for urpmi. There are valid reasons for all of them existing. They all have pretty much the same features and do pretty much the same thing.

    The important thing is to standardise the server index files so that apt, urpmi, and yum can all access the same software repositories, a boon to non-distro-specific software developers. Then, if the distros can standardise their file directory structures . . . Well, too much to hope for, I suppose with SuSE's unique approach.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  54. Re:Mandrakesoft promptly.....actually.... by Moulinneuf · · Score: 0


    ROFL !1!!1!

    They then turn to Red hat for help and Red Hat answer is :

    Sorry its not our problem its europe problem we will join when the war is actually won and that whe can claim to have done the job all by ourself ... where a bunch of coward you know.

    --
    I am a REAL American from Canada , not a wanna-be from the country , self called "last remaining superpower" "of America
  55. Re:Mandrake support level? by INeededALogin · · Score: 1

    There is a nasty bug in Linux that makes the computer reboot every 49.7 days.

    wtf... Nothing special, just a machine I am logged into right now.

    # uname -m -r -s -p
    Linux 2.4.27 i686 unknown
    # uptime
    4:25pm up 104 days, 16:25, 7 users, load average: 0.15, 0.44, 0.72

  56. I for one ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new cheese-eating, samba-dancing, stinky overlords

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. My note on Mandrake Usability.. it 'just works' by hyfe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm posting this from my dell inspirion 8200 laptop running Mandrake 10.1. Mandrake installed advanced power savings, sound, network (including wireless with a little extra work) and graphic card automatically no-hazzle. This is alot better than what the other distroes I've tried have managed. (and yes; I'm one of the funny people who prefer that things 'just work')

    Debian; I never managed to get the ATI drivers to play nice with my card (and this wasn't for lack of trying)

    Fedora didn't want to give me sound, nor did it give my laptop power-savings.

    Suse I never tried, and compiling/Gentoo is out of the question.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:My note on Mandrake Usability.. it 'just works' by djuuss · · Score: 1

      Me too, i'm a mandrakeclub silver member, running 10.2 beta2. I believe mandrake, using apt-rpm and synaptic (from the mandrake control center) will make a lot of people more aware on the alternatives too m$. SuSe is okay too, but it's not good. I hear 9.2 has some mayor improvements in it though.

      --

      my capcha was condom
  59. OH MY GOODNESS! by jack_csk · · Score: 1

    First the slashdot editor repeat the same story a few weeks later, then the second day, and now on the SAME f*cking day... I wonder if next time they are going to repeat the store the next hour

  60. More Visible by soloport · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but this chart makes things look much more crisp and clear.

  61. That's true, but by grumling · · Score: 1
    If you do a default installation, you cannot compile a kernel. And, I've had one heck of a time getting anything other than the included applications running. I'm sure lots of that is operator error, but still, for the "easiest" Linux distro out there, it still can't quite get to Windows' installation ease.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  62. How?-BetaFUD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "(Compare that to other operating-systems, where if you so much as change a hard-drive, you have to beg for permission to continue using the OS)"

    You mean like I had to do with W2K when I replaced the MB, processor, Ram, and power supply?*

    *Take note companies don't have to either.

  63. Re:Mandrake support level? by Knuckles · · Score: 1

    use Linux only to boot into illegal copies of Windows

    Pray tell, how do I do that?

    --
    "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
  64. Only 51% sales by anno1602 · · Score: 1

    Actually, only 51% of their revenue comes from sales, the rest is consulting/support.

  65. Re:But why does Mandrake still stuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    France was right about the WMDs. US was wrong. Now the French are 'whiny pussies'? Besides I haven't noticed France/Mandrake having an image problem outside of the United States.