Slashdot Mirror


Telco Spams and Gets Huge Fine

jack_call writes "According to The Register the large German based mobilephone operator 'Debitel' was fined $359000 for (deliberately!) sending a total 48000 spam messages( mail: 36000, sms: 12000) to Danish costumers of rival company 'Telmore'. According to different Danish media outlets, they appealed immediately, mostly because the fine comes out at about a sixth of what 'Debitel' made last fiscal year after taxes."

190 comments

  1. Competition? by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would a telco consider a costumer to be competition?!

  2. not cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    $7.47 per spam - faark.

    perhaps other buisnesses will think first

    1. Re:not cheap by mridle · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually they got a volume discount! (no, I'm not joking you).

      The standard rate in Denmark is approx. $18 (100 DKK) per message. But the poewrs that be (our government and it's institution) has opened up for discount in cases like this.

      Debitel was offered a $180.000 (1.000.000 DKK) settlement over a year ago, but they decided, that they'd rather take it to court. That might have been a poor judgement from their management....

  3. Re:Lots of money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of money? Check again, it's in USD. It's not like it's EUR or GBP or something. Oh, and the more they wait to pay that fee, the cheaper it will get. I wouldn't think the interest can make up for the steady fall of the mighty dollar...

  4. 1/6 is 5/6 too few by BortQ · · Score: 3, Insightful
    They should be forced to pay through their noses. The fact that they make good money is no reason to fine them less.

    And I say put the money towards going after more spammers. Build up the momentum these cases provide.

    --

    A Multiplayer Strategy Game for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux
    1. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Subject matter shows great objectivity.

    2. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by halleluja · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A Multiplayer Strategy Game [sillysoft.net] for Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux

      Look who's spamming II, silly

    3. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you don't want to receive spam, stop using e-mail.

    4. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 5, Insightful
      And going to prison for shoplifting a $1 item may incur a very serious fine, a criminal record and possibly prison.

      Companies should get a simple message - break the law and there will be serious penalties, not some small slap on the wrist that means that you can almost cost it in as an acceptable and calculable risk.

    5. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by Splab · · Score: 0

      This being Denmark you probably need to kill someone to get into jail - however, it will get on your record if you shoplift.

    6. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by mikrorechner · · Score: 1


      Considering that they had a total revenue of nearly 3 billion US-$ in 2003, they don't really "make good money".

      Debitel is the largest mobile phone service reseller in Germany. They used to be a subsidiary of DaimlerChrysler, no less.

      --
      "Oh, a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-my-own-Grandpa." - Dr Hubert Farnsworth
    7. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by Short+Circuit · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're welcome to turn off viewing of signatures...

    8. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by dustman · · Score: 1

      ... not some small slap on the wrist that means that you can almost cost it in as an acceptable and calculable risk.

      I remember a story my high school history teacher told the class: Campbell's used to run ads, where they said "Campbell's Tomato Soup tastes better than (Hunts? some competitor, I don't remember) because it has more tomatoes per can of soup."

      The other company complained and/or sued, because this wasn't true. Campbell's was fined for false advertising.

      However, this advertising campaign was so successful that Campbell's just continued running the ads and paying the fines.

    9. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by tehshen · · Score: 1

      Ah, but a quarter of the spams 'Debitel' sent were SMS messages! Spam can take other forms too (including meat)

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    10. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      And there's a few rich SOB's out there that will park in handicapped spots and just have their accoutant pay any fines.

      $200 fine, 10% chance of getting a ticket, average cost for parking there, $20. I know airport parking places that charge less. And I think that 10% is high.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused. First you imply that a harmless offense shouldn't be penalized with overly severely, then you say that this company should be punished severely for their offense. In the grand tradition of Slashdot reasoning, the shoplifter has stolen something, but the phone company hasn't, so what's the problem?

      I'm thinking a 3-strikes system, or an exponential increase in fines for repeat offenses. That way someone who makes a mistake can be forgiven, but nobody can figure that the price of the fine is just another business expense.

    12. Re:1/6 is 5/6 too few by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1
      Maybe I didn't write it too clearly.

      My point was that committing the crime of shoplifting is punished hard and rightly so. If you steal a $1 item, you'll get a lot more than a $1 fine. A LOT MORE.

      Most people considering shoplifting to be immoral, and the penalties are severe. Most companies when they break the law, however, get such derisory fines compared to their size that it rarely acts as a deterrent.

  5. Accidental by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sure it was all an accident ;)

    Your honor, I accidentally gathered a massive mailing list, sat around many meetings working out what to say, and finally clicked send - all totally accidentally. I thought I was sending my mother some flowers over the internet, honestly I did.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Accidental by mysticwhiskey · · Score: 1

      And what's worse is that the costumer's always right! Tell that to my colour-blind tailor!

      --

      Stuck down a hole! In the middle of the night! With an owl!

    2. Re:Accidental by mors · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The SMS'es were send to every single mobile number in Telmores assigned block of mobile phone numbers. That cannot possibly count as accidental.

  6. "costumers"? by Yehtmae · · Score: 0

    Yep, mustn't upset those artistic types.....

  7. In India too by nbharatvarma · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I live in India and I am constantly bogged by sms' asking me if I was interested in winning gold, buying a car etc. What's worse ?? Sometimes, we get automated calls asking if we are interested in some offers.

    If I want to know about some offer, I will ask. Thank you.

    Was thinking of writing to a newspaper, but that idea got lost somewhere in a mire of laziness

    --
    ... and I shall strike upon thee with great vegeance, furious anger and a slightly positive karma.
    1. Re:In India too by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

      I live in India and I am constantly bogged by sms' asking me if I was interested in winning gold, buying a car etc. What's worse ??

      What's worse? What's worse? I'll tell you what's worse! I used to get those calls all the time. Now I don't get them at all. I need those calls! I'm a socially inept nerd who desperately needs human contact. Now they go and outsource my only source of human contact to India? Take my job, but don't take away my phone spam, too!

    2. Re:In India too by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not even human interaction these days. Where before I could have fun playing along with the telemarketers (some of whom recognized that I was just stringing them along, and even had a sense of humor about it), now all I get are recorded messages. I'll pick up the phone and say "Hello?", there will be a pause, and then an overly-slimy recorded message (worse than a bad used car salesman) will start: "Hi, this is Jim. Are you tired of your high cable TV bills?" I don't even have cable TV.

    3. Re:In India too by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      now all I get are recorded messages. I'll pick up the phone and say "Hello?", there will be a pause, and then an overly-slimy recorded message (worse than a bad used car salesman)

      At least it's something. Something... anything... I need it....

    4. Re:In India too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      you know how to make them stop?

      demand for them to tell you were they got your infomation from that will shut them the fuck up.

    5. Re:In India too by Quill345 · · Score: 1

      I live in India and I am constantly bogged by sms' asking me if I was interested in winning gold, buying a car etc. What's worse ?? Sometimes, we get automated calls asking if we are interested in some offers.

      The funny part is that the spam you're getting is coming from American [call] centers.

    6. Re:In India too by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Go to India, and get a job at a tech support call center.

    7. Re:In India too by GweeDo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why not get on the national do no call list? I haven't had a telemarketers call since I signed up.

    8. Re:In India too by Doctor+Crumb · · Score: 1

      If I get a machine calling me, I hang up right away. IF they really want to talk to me, they can pay a real person to do so. It's still a hassle to answer in the first place, of course. /me looks into the status of canada's do-not-call-list...

    9. Re:In India too by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Maybe because he lives in India and not the US?

    10. Re:In India too by sphariss · · Score: 1

      What I hate about those recorded messages is that they tie up the phone even if you hang up. I tried to use place a call once about FIVE min after getting a robo-call and the voice was still blabbing on about whatever it was they where selling.

    11. Re:In India too by spungebob · · Score: 1

      If I get a machine calling me, I hang up right away.

      As long as you're not paying for the call, do what I do: DON'T HANG UP! Keep the g*damn machine on the line as long as possible and make their system as inefficient as possible.

      EVEN AFTER THE MACHINE HANGS UP, I still keep the line open until I know the line has disconnected from MY end (you'll know its dropped when it starts to dial you into the pre-recorded message that tells you to hang up).

      I like to go that extra mile because it keeps the line open a while longer and when the machine tries to flash the line to make another call all it gets is dead air until the line is completely dropped. You can even hear it trying to flash to the next call while your line is still open.

      It's a small, but satisfying victory. But imagine the impact if everyone were to do this!

      --
      It takes an idiot to do cool things - that's why it's cool!
    12. Re:In India too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, this is Jim. We have heard that you may be interested in receiving cable TV?

    13. Re:In India too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they ignore that (been on it since day one) and give *no* contact info of any kind.

      Because it's a recorded message that asks you to leave *them* a message... blah.

    14. Re:In India too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Be sure and give the phone number in the message a call at least once, or they will be able to claim that you never asked to be taken off their list.

      If that fails and you keep getting messages, all you need to solve the problem is three numbers: *57, 311, and 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(B). Once you trace the call, the phone company has an official record of the dialing number, even if they have caller ID block. File a harassing phone call report with your local police, so that they have a record too. Then file suit in small claims court for a violation of the TCPA. It's cheap, and it's a slam dunk.

      Here's another number you'll like: $500 for each incident, with treble damages if the violation is willful. 47 U.S.C. 227(c)(5). If you file a police report the first time after you told them not to call back, and tell the police that you told them not to call, every call on your answering machine after that is worth $1500. Just make sure not to let them build up too long, or the judge will think you're being a dick, and throw out the case. Yes, the judge can do that.

  8. What about the spam, by scenestar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That they keep sending to their own customers?

    --
    perpetually dwelling in the -1 pits
    1. Re:What about the spam, by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      What about the spam that they keep sending to their own customers?

      Don't like it? Don't sign up with them.

    2. Re:What about the spam, by z1d0v · · Score: 1

      It depends on your contract. I'll give you an example. In Portugal, the mobile operator TMN doesn't send any promotion SMS (aka spam) by default. However, when adhering to their free mytmn service (where you can send free sms with some restrictions), you're accepting the terms of that contract where it specifically says that they may send you any "selected" junk sms they want!

    3. Re:What about the spam, by idontgno · · Score: 1
      when adhering to their free mytmn service (where you can send free sms with some restrictions), you're accepting the terms of that contract where it specifically says that they may send you any "selected" junk sms they want!

      TANSTAAFL, baby. Heinlein had it right. Never forget: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free Lunch. If you think it's free, that's just because they're hiding what it really costs.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  9. Ah ha by ttys00 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That'll teach 'em to spam the judge ;)

  10. costumers by ratonu · · Score: 2, Funny

    when you say costumers you mean people wearing a costume ? in this case they should be fined for discrimination as well!! bastards!!

    --
    set your threshold at -1 if you want to see me
    1. Re:costumers by Andrewkov · · Score: 0

      And I thought a costomer was a customer who costs more money then he brings in. :-)

    2. Re:costumers by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      No. Costumers are people who supply costumes.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  11. Telesales by flumps · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now if the concept could be extended to telesales, my sanity levels would definately be returned to normal.

    Not a single day goes by when I'm not phoned up by some mechanical phonedialer/call centre and asked if I'd like to buy double glazing/dial a premium line/order jam. Arrrgh!!

    And don't tell me to go ex-directory. I want my friends to find me in the phonebook if they need to thanks.

    --
    "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    1. Re:Telesales by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative
      Now if the concept could be extended to telesales, my sanity levels would definately be returned to normal.

      In Denmark telesales are illegal except for a few product groups (mainly newspapers). You can opt out of those as well.

      Telesales to companies are legal though.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:Telesales by R.Caley · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Not a single day goes by when I'm not phoned up by some mechanical phonedialer/call centre and asked if I'd like to buy double glazing/dial a premium line/order jam. Arrrgh!!

      You seem to be in the UK, so... Are you registered with the TPS? If not do so. It only cuts out the semi-legitimate ones, but that is a supprisingly proportion, got me doen from one every day or so to one every week.

      Then make sure you have caller ID and don't answer calls from hidden numbers (unless you work at home and use that line for work, in which case you have to take your chances in working hours. Sigh!). Your friends shouldn't be hiding their identity from you, so this filters out almost all of the rest of the telesales and `surveys'.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    3. Re:Telesales by flumps · · Score: 1

      Excellent, thanks for that! Great info.

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    4. Re:Telesales by TheRealSync · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should try turning the time spent on the phone with sales-people into something funny.

      A small danish company has practiacally turned rejecting salespeople into an artform, as explained on a website of theirs: We Do Not Use...

      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    5. Re:Telesales by pxl8 · · Score: 1

      You can report these here http://www.icstis.org.uk/ if you make a note of the premium rate number you're asked to call. It doesn't take many complaints for the service to be suspended and big fines are handed out.

    6. Re:Telesales by flumps · · Score: 3, Funny

      :) lol

      However sometimes you just need a button to push which gives the caller an electric shock.

      Telesales: Good afternoon sir are you x?
      Me:Go AWAY!! *BUZZzzzzzzzT*
      Telesales: aaarrgh!

      --
      "So there he is, risen from the dead. Like that fella, E. T." - Father Ted Crilly
    7. Re:Telesales by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      You should try turning the time spent on the phone with sales-people into something funny.

      Also be sure to fuck with the bastards.

      One of my regulars has been a holliday scam run by some very very dim people. I left the phone off the hook and their taped message happily talked on and on. My record with them was nearly 30 minutes. Even if they get tehir calls cheap, I am stopping someone else being botherred on that outgoing line.

      Another was a south african lot trying to get me to go to some sales operation, probably timeshare sales, in return for the inevitable free holliday vouchers. They used to regularly call when I was cooking my dinner, so I would happilly talk to them on the speakerphone for ten minutes, giving them bollocks information and swearing blind I'd go to their meeting this month. They even snail-mailed me reminders (they already had my address from somewhere, bastards!). Mildly entertaining if you like play acting, and cost the company money, and I didn't have to be nasty to the poor sods whose best job option is to be call center fodder.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    8. Re:Telesales by Alarash · · Score: 1
      Geez, it's amazing to see that so many countries have that kind of spam. Maybe because of the large number of operators? In France we only have 3 (Orange, SFR/Vodafone and Bouygues Telecom), I've had a line subscribed to two of them, and I never, ever received that kind of call/SMS on my cell. I mean never.

      I *sometimes* have had telemarketers calling to my place, but not for a long time now. Maybe it's because it's illegal in France to sell your customer's database informations (name, phone, interrests, etc..) unless explicitely allowed by the said customer.

      As for the topic at hand, I say they deserved that fine, and I hope to see anti-spam laws enforced in the same way in the future.

    9. Re:Telesales by knipknap · · Score: 1

      In Germany telesales are illegal and I still get those calls. Of course, they do not tell you who it is they are working for.

    10. Re:Telesales by Tim+C · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then how are you supposed to buy the product (should you be so inclined)? Could you not simply feign interest for long enough to get company details out of them, then inform the relevant authorities?

      (That's a serious question, as it's such an obvious solution that people *must* have thought of it, so there's got to be a reason why that doesn't work)

    11. Re:Telesales by houghi · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Denmark telesales are illegal except for a few product groups (mainly newspapers). You can opt out of those as well.

      In Belgium you can not opt out if you have a business relationship with the sender. e.g. my provider could send me a message each day. If there is no business relation, you can opt-out with the Robinson list. This will also work for snailmail and email and sms.

      It takes a while (two or three months) to take effect, but after that you have a great silence. If you live in Belgium, it is certainly worth using. The site is strangly enough not well known.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    12. Re:Telesales by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I don't even own a phone thankfully. I can actually manage without one.

    13. Re:Telesales by goober1473 · · Score: 1

      If I have time I much prefer, why certainly lets talk some more. And not buy the overpriced piece of junk that they are selling, now if only I could convince the rest of the world to do the same...

    14. Re:Telesales by knipknap · · Score: 1

      I never tried to discuss with them to see how they intend to do business, so I have no idea, only guesses: Maybe they forward your orders to some company in another country, that can't really be held responsible. Or maybe these guys just want to take surveys or something.

      Either way, I'm not going to place an order to try out whether I get a chance to sue them.

    15. Re:Telesales by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of those air-horn-in-a-can things works too.

      T: HI! I'd like to sell you some useless cr-
      Me: FWOOOOOOOOONK!
      T: *silence cos their brains just blew out the other side of their head*

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    16. Re:Telesales by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      That would put a bit of a crimp into my day when I call my customers to let them know I'm coming out the next day. :(

      But it would be perfect for waking me up on those slow summer afternoons! :)

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    17. Re:Telesales by Eivind · · Score: 3, Informative
      Move. To Scandinavia. In Norway, for example, marketing to physical persons over individually adressable electronic channels (i.e. fax, sms, email) is only allowed if there is prior, informed consent, or an ongoing business-relationship. The burden of proof lies on the one doing the marketing.

      Penalties: Fines or prison up to 1 year. These actually happen too. This week a company sending spam got a deadling of march 26th 12:00 for providing proof that 5 persons (including me) had given prior, informed consent to receiving marketing-email. If they fail to do so they'll receive a fine of around $10.000.

    18. Re:Telesales by R.Caley · · Score: 1
      I never, ever received that kind of call/SMS on my cell.

      I think we were all talking about landlines. I believe (from the TPS web site) that SMS marketing spam is illegal EU-wide (the UK legislation they talk about is an implementation of an EU rule). I do occasionally get what is clearly SMS spam, but I suspect they are tip-toeing around the edge of the rules -- ``it's not sales, it's <WHATEVER>''.

      I can't remember any voice spam to my mobile either. I suspect the call cost is just enough higher to make it not worth doing random spam campagns to mobiles (cost just to get hung up on can be significant calling a mobile).

      The data protection rules are also, I think, EU-wide. But I don't think they are relevent here. Unlike email spammers, phone spammers don't need big lists of numbers for undirected campagns. They have the phone book, and some of them call at random (using the known structure of the number space) to hit ex-directory numbers (just as some email is sent to common names @some.known.domain).

      If I were a politician out for some easy votes, I'd outlaw auto-dialers. That would really bite telemarketing. The relatively few people who would fear for their jobs would, I think, be massively outnumbered by the thankful millions who would call down a blessing on me each time they managed to finish dinner or watching a movie without a call.

      --
      _O_
      .|<
      The named which can be named is not the true named
    19. Re:Telesales by j.blechert · · Score: 1

      a friend of mine used to work for a local wine seller. they systimaticly called all people in the region and asked them what kind of wine they liked etc. and if they would bother to try a bit of their wine. if they "signed up" a few weeks later some salesman of the company would visit them and let them try some wine and eventualy sell them some. This way it is not illegal, of course every one has the right to not take part in the survey. Of course I live in germany, else my post would be quite useless, wouldn't it?

    20. Re:Telesales by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      I left the phone off the hook and their taped message happily talked on and on. My record with them was nearly 30 minutes.

      My favorite was when I got a telemarketing call and they wouldn't tell me their address. I've never been 100% sure it is a requirement for them to tell me where they are, but I claimed it was. I would just hang on the line until they told me. They tried hanging up, but their phone system wouldn't drop the call. After 10 seconds, someone picked up the phone. There'd be silence, then you could hear them hanging up and picking it up again and again. Then someone would say "Hello?" I answered them and asked if they would tell me where they were. Finally someone did. They were calling from Trinidad. REALLY? I live in the US. I just set the phone down and walked away until I had to use the phone for something else.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    21. Re:Telesales by kleinux · · Score: 1

      My favorite one is to start by talking to them like you are interested in their product. After about a minute scream into the phone ``Oh my God it bit me! I have to go.'' and hang up.

    22. Re:Telesales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This week a company sending spam got a deadling of march 26th 12:00 for providing proof that 5 persons (including me) had given prior, informed consent to receiving marketing-email. If they fail to do so they'll receive a fine of around $10.000.

      A whole ten dollars!!!

    23. Re:Telesales by hatchet · · Score: 1

      Parent indeed made a mistake with that number, but it wasn't that there should be comma instead of dot, it's that there shouldn't be a dot.
      Many european countries (including mine) use decimal comma and use dot (.) for signifing thousands. But, the dot for thousands should only be used for numbers larger than million, unless there is also a decimal comma.
      1.000 incorrect
      1000 correct
      1.000.000 correct
      323.321,555 correct
      323.321 incorrect
      323321 correct
      Using this rule, people always know which separator is for thousands and which one is decimal... be it comma or dot.

    24. Re:Telesales by ManxStef · · Score: 1

      Well if you're in the UK then you're in luck: the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) is remarkably effective, or at least has been for me.

      Recommended by a friend who works at a local telecoms firm, I was rather sceptical but surprisingly it's cut out ALL of those annoying Sunday morning pre-recorded messages, and we've not had a single marketing call since (touch wood!). I signed up work's fax number, too, and we've seen a massive reduction in junk faxes - esp. those premium-rate joke/vote/prank ones. It doesn't work for SMS texts, but that's 'cause they're illegal in Europe, anyway. Might be worth a try?

    25. Re:Telesales by ManxStef · · Score: 1

      Oops, didn't see the earlier post above in the same thread. Please make sure that one's modded up instead, thx!

    26. Re:Telesales by joostje · · Score: 1

      Then how are you supposed to buy the product (should you be so inclined)? Could you not simply feign interest for long enough to get company details out of them, then inform the relevant authorities?

      They are after *your* details, and don't have to give out the company details to sell you the product. I guess they'll just refuse to give any info about the company they work for.

    27. Re:Telesales by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Violation of several rules of war:
      "Please hold"
      -Alternate hold button leading to tape loop of "Goldfish Warning".

      Guaranteed insanity in 30 seconds or less or your money back.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  12. And they got off easy ... by zonix · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's worth noting that previous spam fines in Denmark have been much higher. Around 15USD per e-mail/SMS/whatever.

    But still, it's a good part of Debitel's yearly income.

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:And they got off easy ... by Carthag · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually this fine is about 5 times larger than any previous spam-related fine in Denmark, according to Politiken, a Danish newspaper.

    2. Re:And they got off easy ... by malsdavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      5 times larger in overall value.

      But I think what was meant was that in terms of per email cost, it is lower than previous spam fines.

    3. Re:And they got off easy ... by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      ... which is actually a good thing. How are fines supposed to make a difference if the company doesn't even feel them?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    4. Re:And they got off easy ... by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      Indeed. It reminds me of the EU fine against Microsoft.

      Sure it was the biggest fine the EU have ever given out to a company but what does 500 million count to a company which has however many 10's of billions sitting around in the bank.

      Its an ironic problem really. The more companies act unscrupulously means the more money they have available to pay of the fines for that bad behaviour.

  13. Good job i say by quale · · Score: 1


    I for one is more happy now that i know it cost them that much to spam my mobile phone like that. I was pissed off when i get the spam and for once somebody gets to pay when they misuse my time. Now if only someone had the balls to go for big time spammers ...

  14. A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think they got what they deserve. Although, before this turns into a disscussion about telemarketing, and how everyone hates them, remember: Telemarketers are human too. Yes, mod me down for the horrible, evil statment I just made. But, they are. The person you actually talk to has nothing to do with the product, they're just someone hired to call people on a list given to them. They probably don't even like their job, but need employment and are doing it for the money, so think about that before you verbally attack one. How do I know? Well, my mother was one for a short while, many years ago.

    With all that said, there is one way to get rid of telemarketers that is funny and polite.

    Telemarketer: Hello, may I speak to whomever is in charge of chosing telephone service?
    You: Yes, this is him.
    T: Great, would you be interested in lowering your monthly telephone bill? If you switch to A&G telco service, I can offer you a great, low rate.
    Y: We don't have telephone service in my house, or telephones.
    T: Surely you must, sir. How are we having this converstaion?
    Y: That's a good question. But I can assure you we don't have telephone service.
    T: Are you sure.
    Y: Positively.
    T: Alright then... Uh, sorry to bother you.

    You could say this for anything they're selling. "Sorry, we don't have ______." They'll almost always be confused and just apologize and hang up.

    1. Re:A thought by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative

      Theres a great site listing lots of these.

      Its here :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    2. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more likely they will identify you as a non opportunity and move on. Most marketing that raises awareness of a product takes your time, just a bit more subtle.

    3. Re:A thought by NetNifty · · Score: 4, Funny

      I once told a telemarketer trying to sell me (double glazed) windows that I don't need any because I run Linux...

    4. Re:A thought by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Alternate ending:

      Y: We don't have telephone service in my house, or telephones.
      T: Surely you must, sir. How are we having this conversation?
      Y: Voices in my head.
      T: Sorry?
      Y: The telephone company came and took away all the phones. Now they send all calls directly as voices in my head. Unfortunately, it is hard to tell the telephone voices from the ones informing me that Queen Elizabeth is a reptile who must be stopped. What type are you?
      T: Huh? I'm sorr...
      Y: If you're not one of us, you're one of them. STOP PERSECUTING ME! We're onto you and your mind experiments.
      T: Uh...
      Y: Listen, this line can only handle one schizophrenic delusion at a time, and I'm expecting a call from my mother, so if you don't mind...
      T: I'll call back later. [click]

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:A thought by hojita · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why bother verbally attacking? I tend to follow this response, which works in nearly every case:

      Telemarketer: Hello, may I speak to whomever is...
      You: [click]

    6. Re:A thought by CrackedButter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      touche

    7. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably don't even like their job, but need employment and are doing it for the money, so think about that before you verbally attack one

      Boo hoo. There are plenty of jobs that don't involve invading the privacy of hundreds of individuals every single day. If you choose to be a tool for an industry so utterly devoid of ethical standards then you deserve any verbal abuse you get as a result.

      Oh yeah, I got mugged the other day, but that's OK, because he probably doesn't like being a mugger and was only doing it for the money.

      I'll make a deal with your mom, or any other telesales people you know - if they don't call me at home, I won't tell them to go fuck themselves.

      If they don't like it, they need to start taking responsibility for their own actions. Ultimate responsibility for these nuisance calls lies with the employees of the telesales companies who make them.

      These people are relying on the politeness of the people they call. The way to stop these telesales calls once and for all is for us all to be so rude and abusive every time one calls that the job becomes one that no sane human could hold down.

    8. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, my mother was only a telemarketer for about 2 days, 30 years ago. I mentioned she was for only a short while. Apperently, you didn't read. You, my good sir, can go and engage in intercourse with a porcupine, and I'm sure you'll be proud of your bastard animal children. You seem to be so hostile, you must have a lot of pent up rage. There are things so much worse in life than telemarketers, but apparently that's all you have to focus your hatred on. How sad.

    9. Re:A thought by Izzard · · Score: 2, Funny

      I simply say "Oh, I'm sorry, this is a Technical Support Hotline that you've called."

      Nine times out of ten they'll sheepishly apologise for bothering me. I'm not sure why this works so well but I think it's because everyone is basically aware that you'll never get what you want by talking to a Technical Support Hotline, so they feel stupid for calling.

    10. Re:A thought by Moonlapse · · Score: 1

      Telemarketer -"Hello, I'd like to tell you about this great offer i have available for you if you subscribe right now to the Inquirer!" Me - "I CAN'T READ!!!" Telemarketer - "..."

      --
      - I got my free iPod and a free Nintendo DS....why not
    11. Re:A thought by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Yeah I got rid of my landline for exactly that reason. I was getting too many telemarket call every day. Now that I am all Cell I only get a few (from companies I already deal with, like the cell company etc...)

      Anyway My favorite line to deal with the telemarketers is very simple. I just pretended to be a kid every time.

      Telemarketer: Hello, may I speak to whomever is in charge of chosing telephone service?
      You: I am sorry my dad isn't here right now...
      T: When would be a good time to call back?
      Y: Well he usually gets off work at 5pm
      T: Thank you we will try again another day.
      Y: Bye.

      That simple. Guess what? Eventually they are gonna call you again no matter what you say. Just keep using it. Its Gold baby!

    12. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better way (if you don't need your phone line for a couple of minutes):

      Telemarketer: Hello, may I speak to whomever is in charge of chosing telephone service?
      You: Hang on a second, I'll go get him.

      Put the phone down, check if they're still waiting after 10 minutes, explain that you can't find anyone who's willing to talk to a telemarketer, hang up.

    13. Re:A thought by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Someone who shovels horse shit for a living is damn well going to have to deal with the stink. Someone who steals purses for a living is damn well going to have to run their ass off being chased by police and others, and potentially get a broken bone or other physical injury when caught. Someone who chooses to be a telemarketer is damn well going to get verbally RAPED for intruding into people's lives.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    14. Re:A thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whores are people too but that doesn't stop me from killing a couple every other week.

  15. Good. by jpiggot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Sweet God, but this is wonderful news that they've been fined...

    I live in fear of this happening on a large scale in the United States. In a country where we pay (at this point) for incoming calls, I'm just waiting for the deluge of spam messages and telemarketer phone calls to appear on my cellular phone.

    I own a small business, and our fax machine has virtually been made useless by the junk faxes we get every month. I promise you, we spend more on incoming faxes (ink, paper) than we do on outgoing faxes, none of which we ever "intentionally" signed up for. And the junk-fax companies have the balls to say "we're only making a living" ??? Please.

    Destroy these people before they destroy another technology.

    1. Re:Good. by jpiggot · · Score: 1
      You're hysterical.

      Next time I get one of the hundreds "Invest in this penny stock" junk faxes, I'll look for the "unsubscribe" number, which clearly says "call me to confirm that you want to get faxes for the rest of your life"

      I get lots of unsolicited "make your dick hard" emails, too...but I don't think they really care if I unsubscribe to their email lists, either...

    2. Re:Good. by nsasch · · Score: 1

      A few years ago, my father received a cellphone call with a caller ID of "ER". Thinking the E could mean "Emergency", he answered the call. That call was a telemarketer. He got a contact number for the company and complained later from a landline. He ended up getting them to pay him the 70 cents or so for the minutes that they led him to using.

      --
      Make your computer faster: rm -rf /mnt/windows/
    3. Re:Good. by jpiggot · · Score: 1
      Out of all the bullshit faxes I get, my favorites are the wonderfully partisan ones we get, that say (no joke) "Do you think President Bush is doing a good job ? Fax us back yes or no (only 2.99 a minute)"

      Just like the hot coffee McDonalds payoff, you know "someone" is making it worthwhile...

    4. Re:Good. by ccozan · · Score: 1

      We are using hylafax :)... never paid since then paper or toner. See http://hylafax.org/.

    5. Re:Good. by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of spammers use the "Unsubscribe" feature just to confirm that your email address is valid, which makes it more valuable and more likely to get future spam.

    6. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      A few years ago, my father received a cellphone call with a caller ID of "ER".

      Not in the USA he didn't.

      None of the cell phone systems in the USA have had caller name identification, only caller number, until very recently and most still don't. Some of the phones are smart enough to look up the caller number in your personal phonebook on the phone and if it is in there display that name, but you have to put the entry in there first.

    7. Re:Good. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I thought it was illegal to send junk faxes, up to $500 per fax? Or maybe it was a state-by-state law? Something you may want to look into, you may be able to recoup all those costs from the junk faxes.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    8. Re:Good. by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Next time I get one of the hundreds "Invest in this penny stock" junk faxes, I'll look for the "unsubscribe" number, which clearly says "call me to confirm that you want to get faxes for the rest of your life"

      They're going to be sending lots of faxes to public pay phones, then....

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    9. Re:Good. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cancelled my fax line more than a year ago, when junk faxes outnumbered real ones by more than 100 to one. The loser is the Telco.

    10. Re:Good. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      It is. However the lawyer cost to collect is more than the amount you gain. Thus nothing happens despite it being illegal.

      However that should not stop you. The first few times it costs you, but if you keep it up you can put them out of business (they have to pay their lawyers too), and that helps everyone. Or at least everyone with a fax machine which is nobody.

    11. Re:Good. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Fortunately it is illegal in the US to make telemarketing calls to cellphones.

    12. Re:Good. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      What lawyer costs? You just take them to small claims court, which doesn't require a lawyer.

      The trick is, are you aware of the law, can you track down the business that sent you the fax, and do they have any assets? Can you even collect from them? Places that still send out junk faxes are mostly fly by night companies.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    13. Re:Good. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Only true if you are a individual working for yourself. If you are a company you need a lawyer anyway. I don't know many individuals with a fax machine. I don't know many companies without.

  16. Re:Lots of money! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    Now that's just plain inane. Do you really think a Danish court fined them in US dollars? The fine is $2M kroner, which is converted to USD for the story so that those of us who are not familiar with Danish currency have some concept of how much the fine really is.

  17. Re:Lots of money! by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, the US is the only place where mobile operators get away with charging you to receive SMS messages. And obviously it doesn't cost anything to receive mail.

    Therefore, other than the time wasted in reading the messages, it probably didn't cost the customers anything.

  18. Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by caveman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    On my way to London the other day, I was sitting in the 'Quiet Zone' car of the train. There are notices on every window asking people not to use Mobile Phones.

    This moron gets on at a station, and quite obviously reads, and decides to ignore the notices, and makes about a dozen calls to people which I didn't want to listen to. However, it became quite obvious that this person was engaged in a mobile/SMS/MMS marketing campaign, and various other things he said suggested 'spammer'.

    Of course, rule #3 states that spammers are stupid, and this one was no exception. He rattled off at great length a list of sites, usernames, and passwords for various SMS distribution services.

    I pulled out my newspaper and pretended to do the crossword, writing down every group of site, username, and passwords. I have not done anything with them yet, but I'm sorely tempted. However, as my handsets are all registered with the TPS (the UK equivalent of the FTC do-not-call lists), I'll wait for a marketing SMS to be crapped into my phone before being tempted further.

    If you are 'evileye' (what a stupid username), you might be more careful about where you use your mobile next time..

    1. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you were to accidentally post them here, slashdotters would all back you up in confirming that it was indeed an accidental posting after your hand slipped on your keyboard..

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    2. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by tqft · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You do nothing.

      But if some AC was also in the smae carriage and posted the list to /. or emailed the list to some investigative organisation [spamhaus.org ?]. I am sure some good would come of it.

      --
      The Singularity is closer than you think
      Quant
    3. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by aug24 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I commute 2 hours into London a lot of the time, and I always sit in the QZ, because I don't want to listen to the crappy conversations. Most of them are only phoning people because they are bored having failed to bring anything to do/read.

      Please, always, always, always, ask people to stop when they talk on their phones. I have asked loads of people, and about 90% have apologised immediately. The best bit is when someone argues with you, and the other commuters back you up ;-)

      In the worst case, the guard will tell them to stop if you ask him/her to.

      Justin.
      Silence Nazi ;-)

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    4. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by Tim+C · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you are 'evileye' (what a stupid username)

      Says a guy calling himself 'caveman'... ;-)

    5. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by Seahawk · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The GUARD?!?!?

      Do you actually have guards in the trains? :)

    6. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Oh cut him some slack, we should reward such honesty, which so rarely is shown in our society today.

    7. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by aug24 · · Score: 1

      I have no idea why some idiot's modded you flamebait, but yes, all of SWT's and Southern's trains have guards. They open and close the doors, make sure everyone is playing nicely, and lend me pens when I forget mine.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    8. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by caveman · · Score: 1

      A train guard doesn't work in the same capacity as a security guard, although safety of the train and the passengers is his primary responsibility, secondary tasks include ticket inspection (and selling), customer assistance (announcements, assisting disabled passengers, etc.), and so forth.

      That said, the guard on this service didn't appear once during the entire journey (and I was on the train from Portsmouth Harbour). However, "Daniel", the 'steward', who kept promising that he'd be wheeling a trolley through the entire train selling coffee, tea, and suspicious sandwiches at excessive prices, somehow promoted himself to 'Catering Manager' by the time we reached London, and decided to stay in the front car as far as we could tell.

      Atleast the train didn't break down this time.

    9. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by Seahawk · · Score: 1

      Because some moderators are jerks - but what the hell - let them feel powerful for a bit ;)

      Did you have guards on the trains pre 9/11?

      It just seems really excessive to me to have guards on trains.

    10. Re:Ethics relating to SMS Spamming by aug24 · · Score: 1

      No, we always have had. They have responsibility for making sure people don't fall under the wheels, that the doors are properly shut (in the old days before automatic doors) and that people behave reasonably. They are the people who will call the transport police (special police for railways) if need be, for example.

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  19. Re:Lots of money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    Moron. People don't pay for receiving SMS in the civilized world.

  20. Large? by Mortiss · · Score: 0

    No I have not RTFA

    What makes me wonder is the use of the words "large" German Telco and $359k a 1/6th of the yearly income?

    Surely for truly "large" telco this would be equivalent of pocket money?

    1. Re:Large? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well it's pretty big in Denmark, considering that we're only aprox 4.4mil over the age of 14, and that they have to share the market with atleast 5 other companies...

    2. Re:Large? by esbjerg · · Score: 1

      The post is somewhat misleading. Allthough Debitel is a German company the sentence relates to the Danish daughter company which is also named Debitel.

      The Danish daughter comapany had a net result of 6,000,000 kr eq. 115,000 $ in 2004.

      Thus a fine of 2,000,000 kr is a lot. They even got a 'rebate'. The previous fines was 100 kr pr. email which would have resulted in 4,800,000 kr.

  21. Fines for SMS spam should be higher by atomic+noodle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The fines for SMS spam should be higher than the fines for email spam.

    Why? SMS spam causes more hassle. Think about it. Many people will want to see the message immediately, drag the phone out, poke at those tiny little buttons, squint at the menus etc. At least email spam can be seen and deleted almost immediately (if it even gets thru the spam filters)

    In this case, AFAIK, the same charge was levied regardless.

    1. Re:Fines for SMS spam should be higher by PigleT · · Score: 1

      You also have plenty enough ways of blocking email spam, but naff-all is provided for SMS filtering. I'd be quite happy to let only people in my address-book be able to send me messages, at least for some of the time, but where's the phone with that feature?

      --
      ~Tim
      --
      .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
      Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
  22. Re:Post them here! by Timo_UK · · Score: 0

    Post them here! What better place is there than Slashdot? The vast pool of creative nerds here will know what best to do with it!

    --
    Timo's Audio Software http://www.esseraudio.com
  23. In other NON news... by hashwolf · · Score: 1

    Spammers spam and get money for it.

    --
    - "They misunderestimated me."
  24. The oldest spammers of all by datafr0g · · Score: 0

    Damn courts with their jury summons.

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  25. Screw that. by aug24 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Telesales people are annoying dozens of people for every one that is pleased with the call. They know it. They are accepting money for pissing people off. I don't care if the person on the other end needs the money. A hitman would give exactly the same reason!

    Fuck 'em. I don't care if they need the money, they are being paid to waste my time, and I will abuse them, waste their time, annoy them, in whatever way I can. And that includes your mother.

    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    1. Re:Screw that. by fdiskne1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fuck 'em. I don't care if they need the money, they are being paid to waste my time, and I will abuse them, waste their time, annoy them, in whatever way I can

      I always figured it was my job to contribute to the downfall of the telemarketing industry. If I abused someone enough, maybe they would get out of the business. If enough people refused to work in the industry, there would be fewer callers. Just doing my part. I only wish others would do theirs.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
    2. Re:Screw that. by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If I abused someone enough, maybe they would get out of the business. If enough people refused to work in the industry, there would be fewer callers.

      Given that there are people (who are often about equally well-paid) who are still willing to work at McDonald's, I'm not sure how you can make the telemarketing experience sufficiently unpleasant.

      Incidentally, do you abuse everyone who does things that annoy you, or are you just a sociopath on the telephone where they can't smack you upside the head for being an asshole?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:Screw that. by frankie · · Score: 1

      People have a right to be annoying in their own home, or office, or even in many public spaces. But when someone intrudes into my personal space (physical, email, phone, or otherwise) to be annoying, they better be prepared for a LARTing mallet.

    4. Re:Screw that. by fdiskne1 · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, do you abuse everyone who does things that annoy you, or are you just a sociopath on the telephone where they can't smack you upside the head for being an asshole?

      If someone doesn't bother me, I don't bother them. If they bother me in my home trying to sell me something when I haven't done anything to make them think I'm interested, yes, I'll be an asshole. That's THEIR problem for bothering me. If they go out of their way to get into my space and make themselves a bother, I have no problem telling them how I feel. I don't think that makes me a sociopath. To be a sociopath, you need to have a personality disorder that makes you antisocial. I'm not antisocial. I enjoy company. I don't enjoy some salesperson making a pitch to me unsolicited.

      --
      But why is the rum gone?
  26. They said it was a "joke" by mridle · · Score: 3, Funny

    As the article says, the emails and SMS messages were sent as the competitor TelMore was take over by TDC (the evil former state monopoly in Denmark). In court the Debitel people tried to explain to the judges that it was all "a joke".

    Apparently the judge had no sense of humor...

  27. Re:Lots of money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not quite true. In the UK, you are not charged for receiving 'normal' texts, but you can be charged simply by receiving certain marketing ones (which you sometimes inadvertantly sign up for).

  28. Talking about telephone and spam... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    Well, i guess that is great news, but only for Denmark. I would really like someone to sue this sms.ac site.

    I unfortunatley bit in the site and signed... and yet more unfortunatley was that I gave permission to send request to all my contacts (yes... I am guilty, I use MSN messenger service).

    Now, that site has what I call SPAM, gosh! tons and tons of messages in my phone! and later it was by email...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  29. thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    im sick of bastards who spam mobile phone numbers with text messages about this and that. its fucking sick!

    now if we could only get them indian call centers fined for calling peoples phone numbers and trying to trick them into moving to another company

    i got called by one yesterday and i demanded to know were they got my infomation from (i have never given my phone number or address to them) you know what the fuckers said? that companys infomation is confidential wtf? what about my infomation i said. god damn people make me sick.

  30. Re:Lots of money! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $2M kroner

    What does that mean??? I'd suggest 2 Mkr.

  31. Moral fabric of the industry. by FauxReal · · Score: 0, Redundant

    'Debitel' was fined $359000 for (deliberately!) sending a total 48000 spam messages( mail: 36000, sms: 12000) to Danish costumers of rival company 'Telmore'.

    So what you're saying is... they wanted to debut thier new spring line of uniforms before the other company?

  32. Costumers? by HisMother · · Score: 1

    to Danish costumers of rival company 'Telmore'. Spamming the people who ake their competitor's clothes? This seems like a pretty round-about way of competing.

    --
    Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    1. Re:Costumers? by iapetus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You're getting picky about a typo ('costumers' for 'customers') and you don't check your own post before submitting ('people who ake their competitor's clothes')?

      People who live in grass houses shouldn't throw stones, you know.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  33. But then they'll call back. by caveat · · Score: 2, Informative

    I sold my soul awhile back and worked as a "Marketing Rep" selling to businesses (I NEEED THE MONEY...and I only lasted two and a half weeks anyway); if we didn't get a "No" answer from a qualified contact, we had to put the number on the callback list. Hangups, secretaries, anything that wasn't a person qualified to take the offer explicitly saying "No" would get a CB...so make sure you say "Whatever it is, I'm not interested, do not call back." before you hangup, or else it won't ever stop.

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  34. A neat one. Here is another: by panurge · · Score: 1
    I once told a DG salesman that I was restoring my house to its original condition. What I needed was a set of medieval style lattice windows. No glass, just wooden lattice to keep large birds out, and shutters. The shutters needed to be in elm and the lattice should be in ash, etc. etc. He was obviously writing all this down. Then I told him I was sorry, I had a call on another line, so I could hang up.

    Five minutes later the phone rang. It was the DG salesman calling back to tell me "You are a bastard." This is the first and only time I have managed to get under the skin of one of them, and it was a deeply satisfying experience.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  35. Re:Lots of money! by makomk · · Score: 1

    That's not quite true. In the UK, you are not charged for receiving 'normal' texts, but you can be charged simply by receiving certain marketing ones (which you sometimes inadvertantly sign up for).

    More precisely, some companies advertise "text 'TONE BLAH' to ##### to receive a ringtone", but if you look at the small print, by doing so you subscribe to receive 1 ringtone a week (say) at £1.00 or something, charged to your mobile bill. That's done by reverse SMS (as it's called), as is payment for many normal (one-off) ringtone services.

  36. Private Postage by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Every message to me should come with $1 attached. I'll match their address to my contact list, and send the $1 back. Real people will break even, frauds will pay the people whose identities they're stealing $1 per message. "Friends I hadn't yet met" will be reimbursed as soon as I enter them in my contact list as "friendlies". Watch spam disappear.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  37. Re:Lots of money! by slashdotnick · · Score: 1

    Yes, the UK is rather uncivilised. Fancy a nice cup of tea?

  38. If you can't pay the fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't do the crime. It's hard to feel sorry for them; they knew what they were doing. Cry me a fucking river.

  39. AT&T spams me (SMS) all the time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am often getting SMS spam from AT&T.

    They ask me to go to their internet site on my phone to review the details of some new special. The kicker is that they get something like $.10US each minute I am connected to this service.

    Double whammy.

  40. Spam vs. Advertising by mbonar · · Score: 1

    What I want to know is what is the difference between spam and advertising? If we can now say, "You can't send me spam", can we not also say "you can't send me advertising"? If spam is an invasion of privacy, then isn't a billboard on the side of the street also an invasion? What about the flyers that appear in your mailbox and on your doorstop? Isn't that spam too? Why do we have radios in all our cars? So we can pipe advertising into a captive audience. Why do we have televisions in all our homes? So we can pipe advertising into a captive audience. Why do we have our computers plugged into the internet? Do we really need advertising?

    --
    ... There's no such thing as time; we invented it.
    1. Re:Spam vs. Advertising by Ender_Stonebender · · Score: 1

      I don't think there's an accepted division between spam and advertising. If I had to come up with one, here's what I'd say: Spam comes to you over an electronic, digital medium; while advertising uses physical media or analog media. Why is spam an invasion of privacy? Because they have to have specific information about you (mobile phone number, e-mail address, IM account name, whatever); whereas "advertising" is generally directed toward the "general public" rather than a specific subset of people. So things like billboards, TV/radio commercials, and billboards are "advertising", unsolicited commercial e-mail advertising FR33 V11AGRA is spam.

      And junk mail should probably be considered "spam", but I couldn't come up with a definition that would include it without also including things like billboards or television/radio commercials.

      --Ender

      --
      Loose things are easy to lose. You're getting your hair cut. They're going there to see their aunt.
    2. Re:Spam vs. Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And junk mail should probably be considered "spam", but I couldn't come up with a definition that would include it without also including things like billboards or television/radio commercials.

      Well you actually did, just not in your explicit definition. When you explained the invasion of privacy, you mentioned spammers using specific information about you. Your postal address is as specific as your email address. Broadcasted commercials are there for anyone who can pick them up, like billboards and other signs are there for anyone who looks at them. Junk mail is sent to specific addresses, even if there are a lot of specific addresses in a bulk mailing campaign.

      My definition of spam is this:

      Unsolicited communication, via any personal address or contact information, about commerical or private products, services, and/or offers.

    3. Re:Spam vs. Advertising by EvilSheep · · Score: 1

      A billboard, I don't know.
      The fliers that appear in my mailbox ARE spam.
      If you've ever sent off for a mail in rebate, you get more snail mail spam. Follows the same characteristics, is equivalent in my mind.

      I don't have a radio in my car.
      I have a tv at home to watch dvds, and, if I ever find one with an ad on it, I'll return it. I paid for the dvd. I have the right to watch it without advertising.

      Why do I have my computer plugged in to the internet? good question, but what has that got to do with ads? I have firefox, and adblock to spamfilter websites for me.

      --
      ---
  41. That's not spam by richyoung · · Score: 1
    Most legal definitions of spam make it clear that a company has a right to contact individuals with whom it already has a business relationship with. So technically, it's impossible to spam your own customers.

    And as a previous reply mentioned, you can always vote with your feet and stop being their customer if it's too much to bear. If more people did that, maybe companies would get the idea that it's stupid to spa^H^H^H annoy one's customers.

    IANAL, of course, nor should you construe any positive moderation of this comment as legal advice from the moderator ;^)

    --
    6. Audible Alarm (not shown)
    -from a Cuisinart product owner's manual.
  42. And with many companies by phorm · · Score: 1

    It costs you to recieve SMS messages... which puts it along the same lines as faxes in that advertisers cannot do so at your expense (on a per-item basis anyhow, even email costs overall).

  43. Re:Danish costumers by zaddikim · · Score: 1

    I was actually wondering what the Danish costumers did for DebiTel. How many costumers do you really need anyways? Even most movie companies only employ a few...

    --
    Keen idea man lynches
  44. Corporate Punishment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe corporations wouldn't do so many illegal things if they were actually punished. Punishment should scale to the even the largest corporations. They shouldn't get away with things just because they can afford it.

  45. Cost of doing business? by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    Despite the company taking a one-sixth hit to their net, I wonder if the new business obtained made it cost-effective in the end.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  46. Atleast it wasn't phone spam by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    For a week at the end of January/beginning of February I got an automated phonecall from Vonage nearly once a day. Pissed me off to no end. I pick up the phone, and get an automated voice saying "Press 1 to be connected to an operator to talk about 'Vonage, the broadband phone company'." or something like that... Pissed me off to no end. I finally sent a scathing email to their customer service department, and the calls stopped. (I hate answering the phone enough as it is...but getting SPAMMED with it is too much.)

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  47. Poor judgement by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    I think that started before the court case when they spammed so many people.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  48. Re:In India too:: Supreme Court comes to rescue by codecracker007 · · Score: 1

    Recently the Supreme Court of India asked the Union government, the telcos and the lamers who are responsible for the calls to cut it out or face the music. Some guy had made a Public Interest Litigation in the Supreme Court and has also cited the laws that are prelavent in US, including the concept of DNC Registry. More information can be had from here. As expcted ppl are quite happy. The cellphone operators have also started to do the needful and block such calls, which also includes allowing subscribers to block phone numbers on demand.

    --
    7-8-9-10-0
  49. Sidenote by GQuon · · Score: 1

    My local trains had one regular cabin, one quiet cabin, and one office cabin.

    Well, they "re-districted" that and combined the office cabin and quiet cabin. Quiet office? Heh.

    They abandoned the concept.

    --
    Irene KHAAAAAAN!
  50. 48.000 costumers? by chinobis · · Score: 1

    48.000 costumers? Wow no wonder the costume bussiness is in crisis!

    --
    My gallery: www.estiasis.com/modules.php?name=gallery2&g2_item Id=22