Slashdot Mirror


MSN Sponsors Mensa

crankyspice writes "Fresh on the heels of Google courting members via GLAT advertisements in the Bulletin, Microsoft's MSN is now sponsoring American Mensa events, featuring Mensa questions on the MSN homepage, and Mensa will put MSN's search on their new homepage."

492 comments

  1. So what ? by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Insightful


    Look, I'm no shill for MS - I think their OS sucks dead bunnies through short straws, but frankly, who cares ? MS want to associate themselves with an organisation that likes to consider itself better than average, by their own definition. And the news is... what ?

    I have no respect for Mensa, they like to position themselves as the "society of the intelligent", and yet most of the people I've interviewed who have claimed Mensa membership on their resume are less than attractive as candidates. It's almost a badge of dishonour... They don't fail on intelligence (but that's not normally where people I interview fail anyway), they fail on people skills - being able to recognise that someone else may know more about X than you do, and coping with that knowledge well.

    Oh, I've not much respect for MS either (at least technically - I think their marketing is excellent), but that ought to be obvious from my tagline...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:So what ? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a fine line between genius and insanity

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I couldn't agree more.

      What irritates me about Mensa is the fact that they consider intelligence to be purely a function of a few odd tests.

      Hmm, how weird.

      I've known some incredibly intelligent people who'd probably flunk these tests - folks that can play music so amazingly well and reproduce exact notes after hearing them just once.

      The point is, intelligence is not a function of how well you can do in a few puzzles. And more importantly, it is not all that hard to ace the Mensa test if you prepare well enough for it - just spend a while solving puzzles and patterns, and it'll be a cakewalk.

      It's almost like a self-righteous organization of sorts - hey, lookie! We can solve all these cool puzzles, therefore we'll pretend that we are smarter more than you all are.

    3. Re:So what ? by rm999 · · Score: 1

      The thing that annoys me about Mensa is it centers around pride for something you were born with, not something you earned. You can have an IQ of 180 and I still won't respect you if you don't do something great with it. People in Mensa (who show it off) think they are better than the average population because of they way they were born. How does that make them any better than one of those white pride people?

    4. Re:So what ? by glitch! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What irritates me about Mensa is the fact that they consider intelligence to be purely a function of a few odd tests.

      You mean like gauging someone's artistic talents by "Can you draw Spunky?" :-)

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
    5. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, didn't pass the Mensa test did ya?

    6. Re:So what ? by datafr0g · · Score: 0

      Totally agree.

      Intelligence is a vague term. I don't believe it really exists as a testable "thing" as people learn in different systems - what they can associate things with that fits comfortably into their envioronment.

      Still, Mensa is ok - if a group of like minded people want to get together, that's cool. But they are not nessaceraly what I would consider to be a collective of intelligent people.

      I have far more respect for those who just use what's refered to as common sense - that to me is the sign of real intelligence.

      If only common sense was a little more common... :)

      --
      "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
    7. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      flamebit sucker

    8. Re:So what ? by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've known people who were complete morons. Until you got them underneath a truck or at a baseball game, where they would know an engine inside out or remember the details of entire decades of team statistics. We've all got our specialties.

      Just something to keep in mind...a lot of times, computer geeks think they're God's gift to the earth. There are lots of people smarter at you when it comes to things you know nothing about. I don't know a damn thing about making really good spaghetti or building a car engine. Variety and the collective versatility it creates is what makes society great.

    9. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most MENSA groups meet monthly for dinner and drinks, for get-togethers featuring a speaker or a lively, freewheeling discussion. Besides the test, it's not much different than a Linux User Group, IMO.

    10. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the contrary - aced it and decided not to join them after seeing that they were nothing more than a bunch of self righteous pricks.

    11. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Disclaimer: I'm an Italian Mensan

      First of all, the Cattel IQ benchmark used by Mensa has nothing to do with music skills or other ones because it was created to measure the so-called logical/mathematical IQ.

      Maybe you've met some annoying mensans. Yes, there are _some_. But in my experience I discovered that mensans and geeks are more similar than you may think. Mensa hosts a lot of geeks, and, I'm sure, a lot of geeks could be mensans.

      IMHO having a high IQ is nothing to be proud of, because it's something that you haven't earned or built, but there is.

    12. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 1

      Something like that :-)

      And the worst part is, calling yourself as one of the world's top 1-2% of artists just because you can draw Spunkys. Bah.

    13. Re:So what ? by nbharatvarma · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I was involved in setting up a mensa chapter at where I live (Hyderabad,India). I am also in touch with mensans from Bangalore. I cannot comment on the general attitude of mensans in America, but I never felt a lack of social skills in the mensans I know of.

      We shouldn't mix social skills and intelligence. IQ by itself doesn't mean anything anymore. That way if you were a 99.99999 percentile, doesn't mean shit. You need emotional maturity to carry you through life. That way, except for those who want to boost up their egos, being a Mensan doesn't prove anything.

      I look at Mensa as more of a common grounds for people to meet. Mensans I know are willing to help other Mensans. I have known people who made CEOs, who were entrepreneurs, MBAs so on. What I get is contacts. So, if I need guidance or advice, they are more than willing to help.

      When one slashdot user meets another, there is an instant recognition. An instant willingness to help. (In India, the number of people who read slashdot are few). Mensa is pretty much the same thing. Atleast thats what I look at it.

      --
      ... and I shall strike upon thee with great vegeance, furious anger and a slightly positive karma.
    14. Re:So what ? by Reene · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not that I don't agree with the rest of your post, this just stood out to me:

      I've known some incredibly intelligent people who'd probably flunk these tests - folks that can play music so amazingly well and reproduce exact notes after hearing them just once.

      Depending on what part of the world they hail from, this ability is not at all unusual. Identifying a note like that is called perfect pitch and it's extremely prominent among people that were raised learning tonal languages like Chinese and has a stronger presence among people who grew up playing musical instruments. Reproducing a note when you have perfect pitch is cake if you have rudimentary knowledge of the instrument.

      Alright, I've digressed enough for one thread...

      --
      "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
    15. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > So are you saying that IQ != intelligence?

      No, I'm saying that IQ is not all that is there to intelligence.

      You may get a fewer false positives, but you will get a lot of false negatives - lots of intelligent people who're good at other things might flunk the tests.

      > What is intelligence, then, and how do you
      > measure it?

      There is no single measure, which was exactly my point.

      Intelligence is not one thing, and you cannot have a single quantitative measure of it and label it as, "If you do well in these these tests, you'll fall under the top 1-2% of the intelligent folks in the world".

      That is absolute bullshit. Solving mathematical and logical problems is just one facet of intelligence, there are several others - many, many more.

      What about folks who cook amazingly well? Or paint amazingly well? Or who have a skill for language? There are a million other things - these could be people who'd not touch math or logic with a 10 foot pole, but could probably be extremely intelligent, in their own way.

      I mean, would you say Michelangelo is dumb if he flunked a few multiple choice questions you threw at him? I think not. That was just my point.

      > (For what it's worth, I think IQ, intelligence,
      > and Mensa are all overrated).

      Yup, you're spot on.

    16. Re:So what ? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
      Hi metlin.
      The point is, intelligence is not a function of how well you can do in a few puzzles. And more importantly, it is not all that hard to ace the Mensa test if you prepare well enough for it - just spend a while solving puzzles and patterns, and it'll be a cakewalk.
      Actually, I think that it's worse than that. The Mensa tests that I took were mostly word tests, which were hard because not everybody has the same vocabulary. That really bothered me.

      So, I definitely agree with you all.

      To add to it, I think Mensa made a big mistake by working with MSN on this venture. I'm not trying to bash Microsoft, but Mensa should know better; that is, if they really are all that smart.
    17. Re:So what ? by dtfinch · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that it's worse than that. The Mensa tests that I took were mostly word tests, which were hard because not everybody has the same vocabulary. That really bothered me.

      My experience exactly. They seem to define IQ as knowing lots and lots of words that you can use to be less understood by other english speakers. I was last reminded of this when someone bought me a calendar for Christmas with a mensa problem for every day of the year. It was nearly all vocab problems, the kind that require knowledge to solve, and the few math problems were very simple.

    18. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (For what it's worth, I think IQ, intelligence, and Mensa are all overrated).

      Intelligence is overrated? Personally, all anti-intelligence arguments I've heard have been really stupid.

    19. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      See, if you consider artistic talents to be skills, then so are mathematical or logical abilities. Intelligence by that definition could also be construed as a gift of sorts, no different from someone who can draw.

      I'm a sciences guy - I feel extremely comfortable under quantitative stuff, and do quite well in stuff related to that, too.

      However, I know for a fact that I suck at qualitative stuff - and I've seen lots of people for whom those qualitative abilities are second nature. And some of these people lack the mathematical and logical skills that I do not find all that extraordinary.

      Inherently, I've always known that I'll be in the sciences. And some of those folks have always known that they'd be in the arts.

      The difference is, the society considers my abilities to be intelligence for the simple reason that it has easy, tangible, real world application. And perhaps because I fall under the minority of folks who are enjoy doing this stuff.

      However, that does not necessarily make me smarter than them, atleast in my book. I know for a fact that I couldn't draw for nuts, even if I took lessons my entire life. Or for that matter, analyze and come up with designs. Or a lot of other things. These people can, and that is just no different from the way I do a math problem.

      It is all the same, we're just using different abilities that each of us has been gifted with, that is all.

      While I would agree that it is overrated, I would also add that its definition is being skewed by a handful few.

    20. Re:So what ? by RWerp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So Mensa is an "old boy network"? The worse for it. People will never forgive you belonging to circle they can't.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    21. Re:So what ? by RWerp · · Score: 1

      The Mensa tests that I took were mostly word tests, which were hard because not everybody has the same vocabulary. That really bothered me.

      Hmmm. Not math quizes? Strange. In my area of the world, "IQ tests" concentrate on puzzles, logical quizzes and the like. Mostly measure analytical thinking. I didn't know it was different in the USA. Maybe they had to introduce vocabulary tests because Americans are so weak in mathematics...

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    22. Re:So what ? by jellybear · · Score: 1

      >What about folks who cook amazingly well? Or paint >amazingly well? Or who have a skill for language? >There are a million other things - these could be >people who'd not touch math or logic with a 10 foot >pole, but could probably be extremely intelligent, >in their own way.

      I don't see how the existence of such people implies that mensa is a worthless organization. By the same token, language clubs, painting clubs, or cooking clubs should not exist either, because they do not take into account people who are good at puzzles. Or, perhaps, you are suggesting that we should only have one umbrella club that includes everybody? Or perhaps you are against the idea of clubs/societies in general?

      I'm trying to understand what the real crux of your argument is. Is it just that mensa is perceived to be more pretentious than other clubs, and maybe should rename itself a puzzle-solver society? Or do you oppose the idea of people forming a social network based on test results?

    23. Re:So what ? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      People will never forgive you belonging to circle they can't.

      I agree. Scrolling through the list of negative comments about mensa so far, more and more it's beginning to smell a bit like sour grapes.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    24. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I'm trying to understand what the real crux of your argument is.

      Mensa claims to have the top 1-2% of the intelligentsia of the human population, but establishes the standard for this intelligence on the mere ability to solve mathematical and logical problems.

      That would imply that they measure intelligence solely as a function of one's ability to solve these kinda problems, and anyone who does not fit the bill isn't smart enough for them.

      They can go ahead and do all that they want, but the fact that they club the rest of the world into a "you're not smart enough to join us" lump does grate on me.

      How would you react to a worldwide club of intelligentsia who say that only those who paint Spunky (as another reader put it) will be considered intelligent?

      That's how Mensa sounds to me - quite ridiculous. Their basis of what they consider intelligence is amusing, that's all.

    25. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was last reminded of this when someone bought me a calendar for Christmas with a mensa problem for every day of the year.

      LOL. What did you do to them to deserve that?

    26. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware of that, thank you!

      Your comment brings up something else to mind, though - if such abilities are related to one's upbringing and origin, the same could be said of what Mensa considers to be "intelligence", too.

      For all you know, you may have the ability (whatever - musical, mathematical etc) and not know it at all. Or you might have the ability and do well otherwise, but not in test conditions.

      Either way, Mensa amuses me.

    27. Re:So what ? by RWerp · · Score: 1

      Not really. My wife passed MENSA tests in Poland when in her teens. Her opinions on MENSA concurr with most of the negative comments here.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    28. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      From The Center for an Informed America.

      ...
      For those who don't know, Mensa is, in its own words, "an international society in which the sole requirement for qualification for membership is a score at or above the 98th percentile on any of a number of standardized intelligence tests." It is, in other words, an organization that fancies itself to be a collection of the brightest minds from around the world -- who amuse themselves primarily by indulging in such intellectual pursuits as eating to grotesque excess.

      Now I happen to have a, uhmm, 'friend' who is currently a member of this organization. He first joined the group several years ago, "out of curiosity," or so he claims. He was decidedly unimpressed with his limited exposure to the Mensa organization, and so he did not renew his membership beyond the first couple of years.

      But early this year he decided to rejoin, primarily to see how the group's publications were dealing with the September 11 attacks and everything that has come in their wake: the steep rise in U.S. militarism; the vast erosion of civil liberties; the pursuit of reactionary social policies; and the exposure of the rampant corruption of corporate America.

      And what my friend found was that the allegedly best and brightest minds in the country were operating comfortably within the parameters established by academia and the American media: the official story of what happened last September 11 is unquestioned, as is the fact that any real investigation into the events of that day has been officially blocked; unprovoked U.S. military actions are given the same superficial level of debate that can be heard on any cable news broadcast; the frontal assaults on civil liberties are either not discussed at all or are justified as a legitimate response to what supposedly happened last September, with, you know, maybe a few instances where the government has, with all good intentions, of course, maybe overstepped just a bit; the social agenda of Team Bush receives barely a mention; and the corporate scandals, and the direct connections of various members of the Bush cabal to those scandals, are apparently old news.

      After reading such drivel for several months now (my 'friend' passes them on to me after he's read them, you see), I still wasn't prepared for what I was to find in the September 2002 issue of the Mensa Bulletin, the slick monthly publication of American Mensa. Featured in a new survey column therein were the results of the first query posed to members: "Who are your heroes?"

      And who do you suppose ended up in the #1 position on that list? Who do the 'intellectually gifted' among us look up to as a hero? Who, above everyone else, does the Mensa community place on a pedestal? None other than George W. Bush, of course.
      ...

    29. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you're right - Mensa lets people join it based on the GRE score too. And the last time I checked, 1/3rd of GRE was based on your verbal abilities.

      Not just that, what about those who were raised in a different language? Mensa clubbing them all into one big group of "non-intelligentsia" because they couldn't ace a few puzzles is quite amusing, to say the least.

      I do not know if Mensa made a mistake or not, but I do know that MS (and MSR) has some smart folks - more smart folks than I've met at the local Mensa.

      Oh well.

    30. Re:So what ? by Triones · · Score: 1

      actually, IQ was "defined" as the score of the IQ test.

      The problem with Mensa is it's too easy to get in. So I'd say it's selective enough. Top 2% is a lot of people you know. So at the end most people in this 2% just don't bother. If they had made it 0.1%, membership would be more attractive.

    31. Re:So what ? by jellybear · · Score: 1

      And yet, ironically, not all pro-intelligence arguments have been really smart.

    32. Re:So what ? by Zorilla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, when I was learning guitar at around age 15, I was told I had perfect pitch. I didn't think it felt out of the ordinary to identify the letter of a note just by hearing it, but I was being told that this was some amazing gift, though it felt like I had learned it (see below about the keyboard) Maybe I should take music theory when I start college?

      All we had when we were growing up was a crappy Casio 5 or 6-octave keyboard with somewhere around 10-note polyphony. The fact that my parents had put stickers indicating which notes were what was probably the major factor in learning my skill. I suppose being able to identify notes still makes a nice party conversation (void if user is a Slashdotter - crap) since I haven't touched a guitar in a few years. Oh well, at least I can tune them really fast.

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    33. Re:So what ? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Most computer geeks are also very logical and will use their brains to work stuff out they don't know.. this is a true sign of being smart. Anyone can read a book and know what to do, or watch someone else do it and copy, but to be truely smart you need to be able to apply basic knowledge and function to complex things and work it out from there. Computers in general are very logical and so most geeks are logical.. so we work things out and can adapt to most things.. where as the people you've mentioned and things don't work the same.

      Cooking well makes you enjoy living a bit more, but you can live with poor food just as well as you can great food... where as you need a good computer geek to make a PC run well.. a poor one.. well hello Windows..

      --
      I like muppets.
    34. Re:So what ? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Erm pardon? If I met another slashdotter I wouldn't react ANY different to them then a normal person. Untill they prove differently you need to assume people are idiots who don't care what you have to say or even remotely know about it.. when they prove other wise I might have an intrest in them.. this would probably apply to most people...

      Untill you prove other wise you're an average person who I couldn't careless for. I don't care if you read Slashdot, Fark, Somethingawful or can draw goatse in a photo-realistic fashion using a biro. You're just a stranger who may have seen my internet rantings, you're as trust worthy as a Nigerian prince with a yahoo account...

      --
      I like muppets.
    35. Re:So what ? by spacecowboy420 · · Score: 1

      While your opinion is valid, it comes shy of the real issue.

      The point of the Intelligence Quotient test is to quantify someone's ability to develop understanding.
      I think an accurate finding would indeed reflect the intelligence of a person.

      However, the tests are flawed. Testing is in a logical, calcuable way in order to arrive at a result. This significally narrows the scope of testing. For example; someone with creative intelligence may not arrive at a solution to a logical question simply because of the abstract nature of a creative thought process. I believe creative intelligence is more of an intuition and is a function of desire and personal will. A musician develops a talent due to his love music, where as a cook does not find mathematics as interesting as leg of lamb. Basically the idea is sound, the measuring device is incomplete. An accurate test would have to find one skill everyone had a genuine common interest in, an ability we ALL have a keen ability in, then measure each ability in that skill. This is not possible, so you settle for a logic test. And we are back where we started.

      --
      ymmv
    36. Re:So what ? by isometrick · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Both my father and I qualified for Mensa. Even though we disagree on many important life issues and qualified at times more than 20 years apart, we both found the membership of our local chapters to be filled with extremely misguided and, frankly, annoyingly pompous people.

      That's not to say everyone in Mensa is that way, but we both chose not to associate with a group that seemed to base its membership requirements on ideals that commonly (though not always) predicate extreme arrogance.

    37. Re:So what ? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1
      " There is a fine line between genius and insanity"

      I agree; the difference lies in knowing where the line is, IMHO.

      --
      C|N>K
    38. Re:So what ? by nordicfrost · · Score: 1

      Well, how about this? Being an ex-member of Mensa (And no, you don't get kicked out), I can Verify all the claims.

      It's a club for people who are really, really good at the tests (I faked it, they are trivial to study for) but not really that good at talking to others. So, when they meet, at least they can talk about the tests. All in all, it is really boring. I just signed up with a friend to prove that the tests are easy to beat. Using a fake name, even.

      But if the members of Mensa like it, hey, more power to them!

    39. Re:So what ? by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 1

      They don't fail on intelligence (but that's not normally where people I interview fail anyway), they fail on people skills - being able to recognise that someone else may know more about X than you do, and coping with that knowledge well.

      Or failing to recognize that allowing yourself to be sponsored by a huge viciously competitive monopoly could compromise your integrity, freedom, and eventually your very existence.

      Being "book smart" and yet gullible enough to trust those who can't be trusted isn't going to save them.

      --
      Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
    40. Re:So what ? by inode_buddha · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      --
      C|N>K
    41. Re:So what ? by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is really odd in a way, because I've taken strong traits of both by way of upbringing... The "most likely" conclusion that I've been able to reach is that thought is thought regardless of how it is expressed. So for example that expression could be mathematical, artistic, rhetorical (in the classic sense), etc. I imagine that it is entirely possible for a 4th-world bush man to be a genius in his own context and time.

      A favorite quotation of mine may say it better:

      "Genius consists in nothing but love; if you love to do something, then you are a genius."

      (Wm. Morris Hunt, American artist, 19th. C.)

      --
      C|N>K
    42. Re:So what ? by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Yeah. I had a friend who was a Mensa member, but he told me he quit because he thought "it was dumb."

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    43. Re:So what ? by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking as a person who has scored well enough on a few tests to get into MENSA, and as somebody who likes to think of himself as a pretty good musician, I think you are somewhat correct in saying that IQ does not reflect the full range of human potential, but it's not supposed to.

      Intelligence tests are written as a best effort to quantify a person's logical problem-solving ability. They are not perfect metrics, but they do give a pretty good indication.

      Artistic expression and similar crafts, such as cooking, do not really utilize these sorts of skills very much, with the possible exception (to a limited extent) of composition or improvisation, where creativity demands use of applied knowledge.

      The thing to remember is that IQ has nothing at all to do with your value as a human being. (Unless you are one of those tiresome fucks who read a few too many Ayn Rand novels in college.) MENSA people just want to have a social club which includes people like themselves. The fact that they have created a somewhat arbitrary obstacle to joining is not so unusual, a lot of clubs to that sort of thing. You have to win at The Masters if you want one of those ugly yellow jackets.

      All that said, I have no interest in joining MENSA. I have enough friends without joining crap like that, thank you.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    44. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was afraid to take their tests because I didn't want to be outed as a moron, even as my friends tell me how brilliant I am. But maybe I'm smarter than them because I know what a well-spoken moron looks like, while they evidently do not.

    45. Re:So what ? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Perfect pitch is overrated.

      What a musician needs is relative pitch.

      Play me a note, and I can't always tell you what it is, but I can easily sing you a perfect major ninth up from it, or a minor third down from it, or whatever, even if the starting note is "out of tune" according to your guitar tuner.

      Fortunately, while perfect pitch is hard to acquire, relative pitch is a skill you can learn.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    46. Re:So what ? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I always tend to think of that line as the one i drew across the middle of my house to keep to keep the walls from conspiring against me

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    47. Re:So what ? by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mensa doesn't design the tests. Various psychologists and beaurocrats do them. They're the same tests that are used to determine whether people are competent for trial, or whether young students are in the right grade or need special education, etc. Nobody claims that the tests are perfect, and they're revised all the time. But they're correllated, at least, with general conceptions of intelligence; puzzle-solving is not at all an ability isolated from every other. People who can "solve puzzles" better can learn math and music more easily, etc, as a matter of statistical fact, and parts of some tests just measure memory. The tests clearly have some measure of validity. You can't dismiss them entirely.

    48. Re:So what ? by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1

      The reason for allowing the vocab is simple statistical correlation with non-verbal IQ tests. It's obviously not culturally unbiased, which is why they also make the culturally unbiased tests, but verbal tests that actually have predictive power are much easier to design.

    49. Re:So what ? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      t h a n

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    50. Re:So what ? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree. Yes most geeks are logical, but logic alone cannot help you cook spaghetti. How much salt do you add to the water? I know, but I don't know how I know.

      Likewise when flavouring things I know where to stop adding the pepper, but there's no magic formula to work out how much pepper you need.

      Some things just have to come from instinct.

      You can live with poor food just as well as you can live with bad food. You can live with a good PC, a poor PC, or no PC.

      Personally, I'd learn to cook.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    51. Re:So what ? by odano · · Score: 1

      It is a green jacket at the masters, not yellow.

      I think you were confused with the type of bee.

    52. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Humanity has survived for centuries without a PC,

    53. Re:So what ? by gvc · · Score: 1

      Not the top 1-2% of artists. The top 1-2% of the population. If you can draw a Spunky (whatever that is) you're doing better than me. Only 97 more "artists" to out-do and you're in!

    54. Re:So what ? by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      1)1 in 50 is not that common. In a school of 4000 there would be only 80 of you. Is that a lot? 2) It might not be attractive to you but to some people people really have a had time dealing with people when there is too large of a gap. This can act as a filter. If you take the test you find people like yourself that want to find people like yourself. 3) I believe there are groups that target the 3rd or 4th standard deviation. if that floats your boat, you will find them. Heck, finding the good groups is likely part of the process for entrance.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    55. Re:So what ? by sachins · · Score: 0
      Well said. But maybe the number of people reading slashdot in india are not that less. In my institute ( Indian Institute Of Technology, Bombay) many students are just glued to slashdot(me being one of them). Also your statement

      " You need emotional maturity to carry you through life. " was just on the spot. Here also I have found many bright students getting their lifes wasted due to lack of public skills.

    56. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Happy Gilmore!

    57. Re:So what ? by HawkingMattress · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most computer geeks are good at logical stuff, yes. That doesn't make them more intelligent. You talk about books. Well take your average computer geek, and your average literacy geek, have them read a novel, then sum it up for you. You'll find that the computer geek generally didn't understood what was important in the book. He can sum it up, sure, but the way he sums it shows that he didn't understood what was important and what wasn't. More importantly, He didn't get the message behind the book, at all.
      In fact, when the literacy geek will explain him what the book was really about, he'll laugh a lot and tell him to quit smoking pot. If the author wanted to mean that, he would have clearly written it !
      The literacy geek won't care, he knows most scientists can only understand what has been clearly explained at them, and that their logical mind comes short in any situation where logic is not the key (that is, 95% of real world situations).

      The literacy geeks accepts that the world, and the people around him are infinitely complex, and that every action or word can be understood when looked at in the right light. Them computer geeks just thinks that everybody is dumber than him, because their logic can't fit in their little categorizing mind. They don't even try to understand others. In other words, if the document doesn't parse, it's because the document is badly structured. It can't be my parser which needs adjustments, because i know i have the finest parser on earth !

    58. Re:So what ? by mirko · · Score: 1

      Grazie Deo ! You're more than a Mensan, then : you're a sympathetic one !
      Have you read the Dan Brown book (don't know its Italian name but it happens in Roma).
      My question is whether you feel or not insulted by this blockbuster that fails to be credible. If Mensans like this, then I guess I'll have to avoid them.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    59. Re:So what ? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      A true geek will product several different versions of spaghetti until he finds the correct object model.
      He will then release it under an Open Chef license and allow other geeks to build in his hard work :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    60. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was involved in setting up a mensa chapter at where I live...
      I never felt a lack of social skills in the mensans I know of.


      By definition, a member of mensa is unable to recognize the poor social skills of mensa members - both in themselves and others. If they could, they would not have joined mensa in the first place. Joining is a process of self-selection.

    61. Re:So what ? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      I Absolutely agree about what Mensa and Mensa members are. But, also, it's funny that Mensa associates with MSN. An association of Mensa and, say, Google would make more sense. But Microsoft Products, specially, MSN, specifically points to unskilled, uneducated masses. Just take a look at the MSN website, and what they usually promote.
      MSN means Stupid-proof IM, and the MSN website is promotion of Stupid-proof content, like TV, and "Does your boyfriend love you" tests.
      Certainly the kind of public that has Mensa memberships, but NOT the kind of public Mensa CLAIMS their members are.

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    62. Re:So what ? by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of tests. The main one as you mentioned is for english speakers, if english isn't your main language then you would be likely to do poorly. Because of that, there are other tests which don't require cultural knowledge.

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    63. Re:So what ? by el+cisne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, yeah, disturbing. But remember that Mensa members are a subset of that actual 98+ percentile -- they are at least "ones that would care to join Mensa". We, here on this discussion, have no idea as to what percent of the 98+ percentile actually joins and is active in the organization. Maybe the ones that get off on doing slick monthly newsletters happen to be Rabid Bushites. Not only is it not fair to condemn an organization like this, but it is illogical to draw such conclusions about the "supposedly best and brightest". They are at least a subset of the "best and brightest" but this subset may also be wacko loafers for all we know, and 98% of that 98 percentile may not have even bothered to join, and are active in The World in what you might consider intelligent activities, (DNC, etc).

    64. Re:So what ? by Metasquares · · Score: 1
      I've heard that perfect pitch makes it difficult to transpose. I think the feeling that perfect pitch is a coveted ability is due to the 6 months or so required to develop good relative pitch... ear training isn't all that much fun, and people who don't have perfect pitch (like myself) probably feel that those with perfect pitch are "getting out of ear training for free".

      The trick to emulating perfect pitch with relative is to memorize a reference tone (I used A 440Hz, but you can just as easily use another note) and hear other pitches as intervals between the reference tone.

    65. Re:So what ? by picz · · Score: 1

      I agree

      Trying to describe human intelligence with a single number is not very intelligent.

      Mensa should be known as a organisation for people with puzzle-solving skills.

      regards
      picZ

      --
      ------- Look mum! I have posted another Slashdot comment! --------
    66. Re:So what ? by Laebshade · · Score: 1
      How much salt do you add to the water?
      The box says, add salt to taste. I may say it as funny but it's true. You salt it until it tastes just right. That is some form of logic.

      It's not instinct. You learn, over time, how much pepper, salt, or other herbs and spices in specific amounts tastes in certain dishes, and you go from there.
    67. Re:So what ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Joining is a process of self-selection.
      More importantly, it's a self-selection that the vast majority (+99.9% of the world's geniuses) refuse to be involved with.

      Some numbers:

      World population . 6,500,000,000
      Top 2% of that . . . 130,000,000
      Membership in Mensa. . . 100,000
      In other words, only 1 in every 1,300 people who qualifies is stupid/lame/insecure enough to fork out the $ for membership, etc.
    68. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mensans I know are willing to help other Mensans. I have known people who made CEOs, who were entrepreneurs, MBAs so on. What I get is contacts. So, if I need guidance or advice, they are more than willing to help.
      Sounds an awefull lot like "Masons"..

    69. Re:So what ? by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Horrible logic.....I bet you failed the test, didn't you? ;)

      (it's a joke, laugh..but your logic does stink)

    70. Re:So what ? by fermion · · Score: 1
      > So are you saying that IQ != intelligence?

      No, I'm saying that IQ is not all that is there to intelligence.

      There is no reason to defend the IQ. It is merely a model that some of the western world feels the need to fit people into. It is somewhat useful if one wishes to know that a person is inside or outside what we assume is to be the middle 68% or so, but is pretty useless otherwise. And why we need to fit people to a model is often in question.

      As you mentioned, We can see the folly of the model merely by noting that it is very hard to measure that number, especially when outside the 'average'. For example, a parent can just have a battery of test run to get the need plus or minus 20 points.

      But the real problem comes when it is used to as a basis to say certain people can or cannot do certain things. A person or average IQ might not be able to be an engineer, but it is also likely, as is shown by the failure rates at enginnering schools, tath a person of above average intellegence has difficulty as well. As everyone who has worked with children know, motivation plays a huge part.

      I know mensa members. Those that are interesting have something beyond intellegence going on. It is not just identifing current fact. It is social, insight , or imagination. It is in fact the ability to create something interesting. It is not just the ability to identify patterns or pompously critic existing objects.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    71. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And what my friend found was that the allegedly best and brightest minds in the country were operating comfortably within the parameters established by academia and the American media: the official story of what happened last September 11 is unquestioned, Just for the record. The page which this AC quotes says...
      yielded a compelling body of evidence that strongly suggests that the attacks that day were a production staged by the Washington establishment, ...The perfectly symmetrical and total collapse of three commercial highrise office buildings that day (WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7), the first such collapses in history, can only be explained as controlled demolitions, requiring a considerable amount of advance planning, preparation, expertise and access.
      I would be funny if it didn't belittle the deaths of thousands of innocent people. There is a reason why this guy hates Mensa so much,, envy.

      Post AC to protect my family, from this (and other) reationary nuts.

    72. Re:So what ? by grahamkg · · Score: 1

      You have a fair perspective on this. I am in Mensa and have been for many years. My involvement is mostly with one of the Special Interest Groups, the Science Fiction and Fantasy SIG. I write short stories for the newsletter. There are roughly 50 people in the SIG.

      Most of the people I know in Mensa are rabid ANTI-Bushites. My friends from the SIG are liberal and don't like him at all. One Mensan I know from the left coast who isn't in the SIG is libertarian/Republican and also thinks little of Bush. Personally I'm libertarian, but prefered Bush over Kerry.

      Point is that classifying Mensans is probably as simple as classifying Slashdotters.

      --
      Graham
      Linux - Fast Pane Relief
    73. Re:So what ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Failed the test? Nah, if you check my posting history, you'd know that kicking Mensans is one of my hobbies.

      Mensa is a scam. Same as scientology.

      I hope Microsoft really and truly gets lots of their future workers from Mensa. Nothing quite so fascinating as watching them give themselves yet ANOTHER self-inflicted wound.

    74. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's horrendous math. Do you think the whole population of the world has even heard of Mensa? or that the whole population has access to comms?

    75. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Able to play a guitar amazingly well != intelligence

      That's the dumbest reason for intelligence I've ever heard.

    76. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Quite ridiculous?

      Mensa use a recognised test for IQ, you could also join with other standardised tests.

      And yes, a measure of IQ is easiest to take using math and logic questions, not a freaking guitar playing test. This covers most of the population but it isn't guaranteed to catch all intelligent people.

    77. Re:So what ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Most of the world's population has access to a post office (Mensa accepts results by mail from tests administered by licensed professionals).

      The numbers speak for themselves. If Mensa's message isn't getting out, it's because either

      1. After decades of existence, they still can't figure out how to communicate their message ...
      ... or (more likely) ..
      2. Most of their target audience is too smart to feel a need to pay money to someone to be able to say "hey, I'm smart".
      Mensa's a scam. Get over it.
    78. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, maybe not. I was one of the first anon posters on this thread dumping on Mensa. What turned me off to them when a cousin of mine used to belong and their newsletters came with clip art of some pipe smoking dude saying "Please deliver to this distinguished intellectual." Sad.

      Years later, after doing the classic underachiever bit and getting my ass thrown out of prep school, my folks took me to a panel of psychologists for testing. I had an IQ good enough to get into Mensa, but just didn't give a fuck.

      Hmmm. Nothing's really changed.

    79. Re:So what ? by Directrix1 · · Score: 1

      There are a wide variety of ./ers, but they all have a key characteristic which in fact defines the typical slashdotter: they like nerd related news and being a part of the community around it. Just as being a Mensan brings with it a defining characteristic: elitist appreciation for conversing with people who did good on a test and are paying monthly dues. That characteristic is THE defining trait of Mensa.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    80. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about folks who cook amazingly well? Or paint amazingly well? Or who have a skill for language? There are a million other things - these could be people who'd not touch math or logic with a 10 foot pole, but could probably be extremely intelligent, in their own way.

      I don't know about the mensa tests, but the IQ test(the real one, given by a traned physiologist) tests for linguistic skill. Don't make the mistake of confusing knowledge or learned skill for intelligence. You learn to paint, you learn to cook, and you learn languages. Some people are better at some of these than others natrualy, but in most cases it's mearly a matter of interest in the subject. If I love cooking I'm going to spend more time learning it and pay more attention when people talk about it, so I will learn about it and show more skill in it than other subjects I don't enjoy.

    81. Re:So what ? by ThJ · · Score: 1

      Maybe... I think you're generalizing too much. You make it sound as if all geeks are narrow-minded. I think that's about as far from the truth as you can get. Geeks take an interest in the world around them. That includes understanding the inner workings of other humans, i.e. their body and mind. A true geek has both vertical and horizontal knowledge, and plenty of it. He simply knows more.

    82. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this right. You cheated on a test to get membership in an organization that you wouldn't normally qualify, surrounded by a group of people of which you don't belong (by your admission of needing to cheat).

      Now, I don't care whether Mensa members are more intelligent, stuck up, or three-armed turkey lovers. Maybe the tests are just to find people with a lot in common. You, apparently, have different interests.

    83. Re:So what ? by Winkhorst · · Score: 2, Informative

      "And who do you suppose ended up in the #1 position on that list? Who do the 'intellectually gifted' among us look up to as a hero? Who, above everyone else, does the Mensa community place on a pedestal? None other than George W. Bush, of course."

      As a former member of Mensa (who does not put it on his resumes, nor the fact that I am a published author either--it just sounds too pretentious), I would just like to clarify one point:

      Almost half of Mensa members are spouses of those with 98%+ IQs. You couldn't very well leave someone's husband or wife out of a primarily social organization. Hence the actual average IQ of Mensa members is a bit lower than that reputed by them, though obviously much higher than the general average. As for politics, ones attitude on this front is dictated by social class and personal knowledge as much as intelligence, though I have seen statistics that Democrats tend to be smarter than Republicans. (No troll, just the fac's, Ma'am.) And Mensans tend not to be poor, though they are not necessarily rich either.

      --
      "Is this Winkhorst a nova criminal?" "No just a technical sergeant wanted for interrogation."
    84. Re:So what ? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Do you by any chance mean the kind of people that take a 4 line poem and write a 40 page interpretation if you say "literacy geek"? I don't think those people understand authors better than your "computer geek" who didn't understand the important message between the line of the book. They are usually as far off from a reasonable interpretation (as in "what the author would tell you if you asked him/her") in one direction as the "computer geek" is off to the other.

    85. Re:So what ? by drooling-dog · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've known some incredibly intelligent people who'd probably flunk these tests

      That seems to be by design. Many questions on Mensa tests are designed to penalize educated intelligence. Here's an example that I saw several years ago (and stewed about ever since):

      Q: Which is the odd one out?

      (a) 4 (b)15 (c) 9 (d)12 (e) 5
      (f) 8 (g)30 (h)18 (i)24 (j)10
      Now, anyone with even minimal mathematics behind them would choose (e), because it's the only prime number in the bunch. But, they would be wrong: The correct answer is (f), 8, because this "the number 8 is the only one which is symmetrical." I.e., as printed on the page!
    86. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, IQ is only a limited way of testing a certain kind of intelligence.

      I come from a family of psychologists and this is what I picked up from one of them the other day:

      The new approach to intelligence is not "how intelligent are you?", rather "how are you intelligent?".

      This means not only Einstein, but Mozart and Rembrandt were intelligent too.. visually intelligent, audiologic pattern intelligent, numberic intelligent, ..

      An IQ test consists of server 'categories', like visual testing, mathematical testing, pattern recognition. But there are many more categories that go untested. For example, a carpenter may be intelligent when it comes to constructions and materials. Intelligence can grow, with practice.

      Some people learn tricks that make them approach subjects like mathematics differently. Some practice with IQ tests and also end up scoring higher. So IQ tests are not completely useless.. but they are like lie detector tests.. they give a measure for likelyhood but shouldn't be considered all that reliable.. human mind isn't absolute but complex and can't be measured in an absolute simplified way like an IQ number. So, unless used in conjunction with a range of other ways to test, IQ tests alone need to be taken with a grain of salt.

    87. Re:So what ? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      When one slashdot user meets another, there is an instant recognition.

      A few things come to mind:

      "Oh shit!"

      "B.O. -- check. Dandruff -- check. Hallitosis -- check. Pasty skin -- check."

      "You fail it."

      "In Soviet Russia, Slashdotters meet YOU!!"

      However, my response to seeing a Slashdotter in public (like that will ever happen), would be to cross the street.

      Being a slashdotter is not a badge of honor. It's a mark of shame. Otherwise, why do I have this big "/." branded on my forehead?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    88. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alot of retarded people can be very intelligent in one way. Some forms of authism include this. An example was "Rain Man".. Some of those have photographic memories, are excellent with numbers "A beautiful mind", and such.. While some functions of the brain (one half dealing with detail, another with abstraction for example) may be over developed, other functions are usually underdeveloped, making them score very high on IQ tests, but often would be classified as retards or nut cases.

      The new approach to intelligence is not "how intelligent are you?", rather "how are you intelligent?".

    89. Re:So what ? by Fox_1 · · Score: 1

      Lets be honest who is the smart man?

      Bob who takes a bunch of tests, and pays a fee so that he can carry a card around that says he is smarter the 98% of the population.

      John who already makes more then Bob, and doesn't need a bunch of tests to tell him he's smart, and certainly has no interest in paying someone so that he can carry a card that says he's smart.

      I don't care if Mensa is a scam of not, but the above situation has always been my take on Mensa and Mensa membership. Only an idiot would pay someone to say that they're smart.

      --
      The rock, the vulture, and the chain
    90. Re:So what ? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I'm obviously not a golf fan.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    91. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "As for politics, ones attitude on this front is dictated by social class and personal knowledge as much as intelligence, though I have seen statistics that Democrats tend to be smarter than Republicans."

      Actually, I've seen data that says the opposite. Republicans are more informed overall about politics (ie the more informed you are, the more likely you are to be a Republican) and have higher average income, education, and intelligence than Democrats. Consider that the Democrats largest demographic group non-college-educated people with under $30,000 in income.

      Aside from some specific elites, ie, leftist/marxist professors and hollywood elites, the general rule is the
      more educated, intelligent, higher-paid, etc. you are, the more likely you are to be Republican.
      The countertrend to this is post-graduate degreed vs College degreed now leans more Democrat; the extreme is being an academic, where the Democrat to Republican ratios reach absurd levels (they exclude Republicans from some faculty lounges more effectively than the segregationists excluded blacks). The Leftist hold on academia cannot really be considered an intelligence thing as much as a self-selection mechanism for capitalists (business) and anti-capitalists (work for govt/academia/arts).

      As for Mensa 'falling' for the 'official' story on Sept 11th. LOL. uh, maybe it's because that version is the truth. Check your 911 Commission Report for details. And there is nothing wrong with considering the President one of our heroes. ... your politics/mileage may vary.

    92. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mensa, soon to be called MSNsa

    93. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point is that classifying Mensans is probably as simple as classifying Slashdotters. ..... Ahem .....

      As in easy troll fodder?

      (heh)

    94. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they are idiots. They have a little mini-test on their website. Two of the "correct" answers are arguably incorrect, with other of the multiple choices being arguably correct.

      So, they should probably fix their own stupid sample tests. /Ass-pengiuns/

    95. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Human beings, even the top 2% geniuses are still extremely limited in memory capacity, time and ability. This doesn't change anything you said but lets face facts, how much time do these people spend doing these things outside having a real life? Surely many mensa members must work a lot (unless of course they are independently wealthy).

      If mensa members are so smart (as mensa claims), then why aren't they all rich and have the free time to think about these problems? This is a problem I have always had with "smartness". They're allegedly brilliant but not globally so. Their brilliance usually falls into narrow areas and some general areas of overall ability we can measure. But they are still subject to all the failings and vices of humanity as well. They are not rational thinking machines all the time either, emotions and feelings are the driving force behind a lot of their opinions and writings.

      I don't think potential ability at performing certain measurable tasks is a good measure of intelligence, because plenty of intelligent people lack good quality judgement and just as many have no ethical, moral, or loving concern for their fellow human beings who are "weaker" then themselves are.

      If they were truly intelligent they'd be doing a lot more to make the world a better place then just theorizing. They should know that investing in people and developing the 'weaker' individuals of huamnity is how progress is made. All people are born ignorant, so therefore an intelligent person should acknowledge that it is necessary to invest in, educate, and engage people and have a geniune concern for everyone because everone makes up the environment in the world and its overall health. You can think you have the best plan in the world but if you can't convince anyone to go along with it, its pretty much either a worthless plan from a flawed person who was not smart enough to devleop a working strategy before concocting is ingenius plans.

    96. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sour grapes?

      Personally I find it funny that some people on Slashdot take so much time to argue whether or not Mensa is a credible organisation.

      I mean, it's a freaking social club, if you get in fine, if you don't then fine; what I can't understand is why so many test failees bitch about it. If you didn't care you wouldn't go on about it so much.

      Honestly, you're all like a bunch of kids in the gym; that bodybuilder is benching 400 pounds but you can only do 50 so you're bitching about how he can't have any friends because he spends most of his time at the gym.

      Try getting out some more.

      Yes Mr. Hudson, much of the world does have access to a mail box but do you really think everyone is of an age to take the test? You can discount half your number for all the people under 15 years old. Or perhaps your own grandmother? I mean seriously, did you even take math at school?

      You have lost all credibility already.

    97. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL!!!!!

      almost but as someone else said, no credibility in these calculations.

      1) much of the worlds population don't even have access to a mail service, millions don't even have an address.
      2) youre including even 1 month old babies!!!!!
      3) it's highly unlikely that my friend Dr Ocho Koko in nigeria has even heard of mensa.

      you need some credibility to knock someone else...... and you have none.

    98. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe you'd consider this a troll, but isn't it possible that the Mensa people really are smarter than most of us here? And isn't it possible that if smarter people than us like Bush that maybe they're right and we're wrong?

    99. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What irritates me about Mensa is the fact that they consider intelligence to be purely a function of a few odd tests.

      And how would *YOU* quantify intelligence? If you can come up with a better answer for this than psychologists have, you'll be rich and famous. More than Mensa is looking for something better.

      I've known some incredibly intelligent people who'd probably flunk these tests - folks that can play music so amazingly well and reproduce exact notes after hearing them just once.

      How do you know they're "incredibly intelligent"? Is that based on your opinion, or on something that can be measured? What is your definition of intelligence?

      Idiot savants may play incredible music, crunch amazing numbers, or have some other fantastic skill, but you can't call them "intelligent" in the general sense (otherwise "idiot" wouldn't be in the label).

      The point is, intelligence is not a function of how well you can do in a few puzzles.

      Most likely true, but how do you measure it?

      And more importantly, it is not all that hard to ace the Mensa test if you prepare well enough for it - just spend a while solving puzzles and patterns, and it'll be a cakewalk.

      One might be able to improve your performance to some degree, but most likely one won't "ace" the test.

      It's almost like a self-righteous organization of sorts - hey, lookie! We can solve all these cool puzzles, therefore we'll pretend that we are smarter more than you all are.

      I've been a Mensa member for many years. I've never had to take the "Mensa" test. I've never been asked to solve a puzzle. Many of us don't enjoy puzzles (or tests).

    100. Re:So what ? by notque · · Score: 1


      And who do you suppose ended up in the #1 position on that list? Who do the 'intellectually gifted' among us look up to as a hero? Who, above everyone else, does the Mensa community place on a pedestal? None other than George W. Bush, of course.

      What that means it that Mensa members are selfish. Intelligent people are more likely to make money, which makes them more likely to vote for Bush.

      --
      http://use.perl.org
    101. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mensa sent me an invitation letter... I declined. Somehow I considered myself smarter than them, I'm not a fool to pay a membership fee to such kind of organization.

    102. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "most of the people I've interviewed who have claimed Mensa membership on their resume are less than attractive as candidates." ...which might be more related to the fact that they claim Mensa on their resume, than that they are in Mensa.

    103. Re:So what ? by composer777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IQ is as much a test of assignable curiosity (i.e. one's willingness to eagerly solve problems that are given to him by others) as it is intelligence. Thus, it shouldn't be a surprise that people who do well on IQ tests tend to also be automatons.

      Further, many of the questions on IQ tests tend to be what are known as "trick" questions. The only way that most mortals can do well on such a test is to blindly memorize the answers. After that, it's a piece of cake. If one pays attention at Mensa meetings, one will notice that most members enjoy solving obscure puzzles, it shouldn't be a mystery why. So, you are also testing for one's willingness to blindly memorize useless trivia, and to work on esoteric, abstract problems. Is it any wonder that such genius's are so detached from reality that they think Bush is a great man?

      It kind of reminds me of star trek deep space 9, where the only noticeably unique feature about the genetically engineered genius doctor is that he has a slight British accent. My belief is that IQ is primarily a test of whiteness. Not necessarily the color of your skin, but whiteness in the sense that you've been sheltered from the problems of the world, are well-trained by "educational" institutions to think in a certain way, and to eagerly solve the problems that one is asigned. An intellectual lap dog. Any resentment of the dominant culture is likely to interfere with one's willingness to memorize bullshit trivia and eagerly work on assigned tasks.

    104. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn right it's not instinct, it's experience. The grandparent seemed to think this was a skill that nobody can perfect unless they've got the magic cooking genes. Like anything else, really good cooks are folks that may have some inherent advantages, but mostly just try so much harder at what they do best than most people care to.

      And in any case, something like "does the food taste good" is a matter of personal taste. I don't add any of the common seasonings like salt and pepper at all to most food I eat; most food has too much salt in it anyway, and pepper doesn't really do anything for me, one way or another. The main reason to add salt to spaghetti is to raise the boiling point of the water a few degrees. Some gets absorbed into the spaghetti, sure, but you might as well wash it all off later, and add something more interesting than salt if you want it to really taste good, like a good sauce.

    105. Re:So what ? by suresk · · Score: 1

      Umm.. Why does it matter how much John makes vs how much Bob makes? Plenty of 'dumb' people get quite wealthy, and some of the smartest people in human history have been very poor.

      As much as I dislike Mensa and all those so-called 'intelligence' tests, I'd far rather use them than someone's income to determine intelligence.

    106. Re:So what ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      For those who doubt that you can cram for the Mensa test, just go and google "Dr. Abbie Salny". This is the person who designs their tests, and has a bunch of puzzle books out.

      Here's some of the quiz:

      1 Sally likes 225 but not 224; she likes 900 but not 800; she likes 144 but not 145. Which does she like:

      1600 1700
      The correct answer: Sally is into numerology. She probably also likes horoscopes. For a good time, ask her what her birthday is, then tell her "What a coincidence. That's my lucky number."
      4. Which of the following proverbs is closest in meaning to the saying, "Birds of a feather, flock together."?
      "One swallow doesn't make a summer."
      "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."
      "A man is known by the company he keeps."
      "Fine feathers make fine birds."
      "Don't judge a book by its cover."
      Before revealing the correct answer ... some analysis:
      "One swallow doesn't make a summer."
      Candidates for Mensa are unlikely to find someone who gives BJs, never mind swallowing ...
      "A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush."
      Again, candidates for MENSA are unlikely to get even one hand in the bush, never mind two ...
      "A man is known by the company he keeps."
      Which company stock you keep do not determine your worth as a person, any more than IQ tests do.
      "Don't judge a book by its cover."
      Riiight ... Just because the title says "Compiler Design in C", be careful, it might actually be the latest Dilbert collection. Unless it's a one-blank-page book titled "Mensa Social Skills Primer" in which case it's toilet paper for ass-wipes.

      The correct answer is: Who gives a fuck?

      Each number shown below follows a certain rule. Figure out the rule and fill in the missing number.

      January 20
      April 10
      May 5
      November 15
      July ?
      5 10 15 20 25
      This is slashdot. Everyone knows the correct answer is either 42 - Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy or "1-2-3-4-5" - Spaceballs
      Two men, starting at the same point, walk in opposite directions for 4 meters, turn left and walk another 3 meters. What is the distance between them?
      The correct answer is: Miles and miles and miles - they're homophobic and don't want anyone to think there's "something between them"..

      BTW, since they started at the same point, they couldn't have started at the same time, since two objects can't occupy the same point in space simultaneously, so the current distance between them is any arbitrary quantity.

      10. If a circle is one, how many is an octagon?
      Yeah, right ... And if my mother had wheels ... what is my father?
      There are 1200 elephants in a herd. Some have pink and green stripes, some are all pink and some are all blue. One third are pure pink. Is it true that 400 elephants are definitely blue?
      Yep, real smart people there, believing in pink elephants, for sure ...

      Mensa - for when you just HAVE to be surrounded by people even lamer than you!

    107. Re:So what ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      No and no. Any more questions?

    108. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh, better tell physicists to stop studying physics and take up literature if they want to understand your so called "real world" then. ;)

    109. Re:So what ? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Absolutely no sour grapes - I just like making fon of them, because I find them funny, in the "funny/people-do-the-stupidest-things" sense. Like you and your stupid post:
      You can discount half your number for all the people under 15 years old. ... I mean seriously, did you even take math at school?

      It seems that you're the one who failed math, logic, AND googling.

      You can't ignore half my number, because:

      1. If you had bothered to google for world median age, you would have found out http://www.prcdc.org/summaries/worldpopupdate02/wo rldpopupdate02.html
        The proportion of children (aged 0-14) is expected to decline from 30 percent in 2000 to 21 percent in 2050.
        So much for "half"
      2. Again, if you had bothered to google, you would have found out that even 3-year-olds can be admitted to Mensa
      It's amazing how many of the people defending Mensa have to do it as ACs.

      My credibility (since you brought it up), unlike yours, remains intact. Next!

    110. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had a point about different skill sets, but you've obscured it with your comments about "literacy (sic) geeks".

      Most literary geeks succumb to two flaws: postmodernism, and over-analysis.

      The number of times they read into something, when it was never the author's intention, and when told this have the gall to say that the author is wrong - the author obviously didn't understand what they were writing!

      For examples, you only have to look at Tolkien's books interpreted variously as a struggle for gay equality (Frodo and Sam apparently), or as an illustration of the horrors of the World War.

      Spare me the literary geek masses. Most of them are just as bad as the art crowd who see deep meaning in a pot of someone's urine.

    111. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "How would you react to a worldwide club of intelligentsia who say that only those who paint Spunky (as another reader put it) will be considered intelligent?"

      Well, if there were any scientific studies done with sufficient historical data showing the predictive validity and the correlation between Spunky painting and people's ability to learn and understand difficult concepts;

      I suppose that would be okay with me....

    112. Re:So what ? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Mensa gifts, I got a Mensan Christmas present as well. It's a book maze, where you go to such-n-such a page, depending on what the answer is. For example, if you think that the answer is foo, then you'd go to page 4, if bar, then 5, etc. I got up to a certain point and found myself going in circles. I wasn't totally surprised, because a lot of it was just me guessing. I didn't have the time to go through every single possibility [ie: find the number of triangles in the illustration]. So, I decided to check the back of the book. It offended me that the answers also went in circles. So, I couldn't even figure out the correct path by cheating; that is if I wanted to cheat. :^)

      I guess my point is that eventhough nobody is perfect, and I'm relatively fine with that, this is hardly a glowing example of a Mensan product.

    113. Re:So what ? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      First of all, I'm not American. I'm Canadian. You're point still somewhat stands, though. They are basically saying, "Well, we'd like to make it possible for people to join, if they don't have math skills. However, if they don't have English skills, then they are allowed to take a different test. However, for all of you brought up in the education system, you get the word test.".

      The problem with that is that you might have stronger math skills or other skills that other slashdotters have mentioned, but since you were brought up in a typical education system, you might be forced to take the word test. So, the way that I see it, uneducated people get picture tests and math tests, while the rest of us get word tests. That's hardly fair because words are far more subjective, and there are many more rules on how we define them. English is like a 1000 digit numbering system.

      Second of all, the better alternative is to have 1 session with multiple tests, where you test analytical skills, math skills, verbal skills, spatial skills, people skills, and any other legitimate skills that require intelligence. When I applied for the Canadian military, they tested for spatial, verbal, and math.

      Regarding people skills, it would also be hard to test, but in theory you could do it as long as each question focused on getting the most here and now. A lot of people let ethics and morals guide their decisions, which can make them look pretty unintelligent, but they are keenly aware of how to focus on the here and now. *shrug* I don't know. I'm just thinking off the top of my head.

    114. Re:So what ? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      1 thing that I didn't like about the word tests is the fact that all the little quiz questions that they share with the public seem to involve spatial skills and math skills, yet when you pay big bucks for the test, they seem to do a bait 'n switch with you, and give you the word test.

    115. Re:So what ? by smchris · · Score: 1

      And who do you suppose ended up in the #1 position on that list? Who do the 'intellectually gifted' among us look up to as a hero? Who, above everyone else, does the Mensa community place on a pedestal? None other than George W. Bush, of course.

      My local group's monthly get-together (party room with bar) routinely has the table where Rush Limbaugh is God. It isn't intellect. It's taste. They are common. Which is not uncommon. Just the all-American lowest common denominator at work.

      Yes. The national magazine is so shallow it is almost unreadable. But again, "The 6:00 o'clock news said the other night....." Who are they to question it? And it would be elitist to have actually read the Federalist Papers or cracked a history book, right? Lowest common denominator again. It isn't intellect. It's taste. Whose fault is that? Isn't it really just another sign of American culture unraveling at every seam?

    116. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IQ is as much a test of assignable curiosity (i.e. one's willingness to eagerly solve problems that are given to him by others) as it is intelligence. Thus, it shouldn't be a surprise that people who do well on IQ tests tend to also be automatons.

      Further, many of the questions on IQ tests tend to be what are known as "trick" questions. The only way that most mortals can do well on such a test is to blindly memorize the answers.
      Horse shit.

      There is no way to "memorize" the answers to most standardized tests.

      You do realize there are ways to test for actual intelligence, which includes, of course, problem solving and ability to memorize?

      If you don't have long term memory and the ability to solve problems, that doesn't make you a "free thinker", that makes you a moron.

      These people aren't "bushbots" because they score well on standardized tests, they are "bushbots" because everyone who thinks like they do in their social circles are also "bushbots".

      Go to a different area of the country, find a similiar group of intelligent people (who might also be Mensans), and you might find that they are almost all anti-Bush liberals.

      It's social and political prejudice, not "intelligence" that accounts for this.
    117. Re:So what ? by smchris · · Score: 1

      You're wrong.

      There is a great difference between a Mensa monthly meeting and a Linux Users Group meeting. A Mensan might actually get laid.

      Our monthly meeting is a party room with bar arrangement. With a rotating attendance of a few hundred it can get amusingly incestuous if you attend regularly enough to plot the relationship patterns.

    118. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for Mensa 'falling' for the 'official' story on Sept 11th. LOL. uh, maybe it's because that version is the truth. Check your 911 Commission Report for details. And there is nothing wrong with considering the President one of our heroes. ... your politics/mileage may vary.
      I agree with your comments about intelligence/education being associated with conservatives/GOP, except for academia and some other fields, however I disagree with the above.

      The 911 Commission was typical government coverup and whitewash. All these "independent" commissions are always handpicked to ensure that the people on them only look where they are supposed to look and only ask the kinds of questions that won't threaten any established interests.

      You don't have to be a conspiracy nut to realize that the official story about 911 is deeply flawed and misleading, starting first, for example, with the rather interesting story of the Israeli spy rings and their involvement in the 911 story, which was covered by the mainstream media, including the otherwise conservative and pro-Zionist Fox News (ie: these are established facts, not nutso conspiracy theories), but which have since been completely ignored and killed with official silence:

      http://www.antiwar.com/israeli-files.php

      Read these stories and ask yourself - if these facts were thoroughly documented by the official, mainstream media, why did the 911 Commission completely ignore, dismiss, or obfuscate them?
    119. Re:So what ? by smchris · · Score: 1


      I think people just don't appreciate their own strenghs and weaknesses.

      This seems apparent to me looking at common number series questions. How can someone assert that completing a number series is a "purer" measure of intelligence than a verbal/cultural question? I can come up with all sorts of TORTURED PTOLEMAIC COMPLETIONS to a number series. But obviously there is ONE elegant WELL-KNOWN curve defining any particular series that a person KNOWLEDGEABLE and PRACTICED in various mathematics would recognize from EXPERIENCE. So, then. Why is this any different from a verbal/cultural question?

      I think this point cuts to some of the snobbism about hereditary IQ that is much too prevalent in IQ societies.

    120. Re:So what ? by xander2032 · · Score: 1

      Now that's just sad! Bush?? How could anyone with an IQ higher than Bush's actually look upto Bush?? Mensa is full of idiots... My IQ qualifies me to join... But why the hell would I? They're a bunch of stuck up assholes. And it's no surprise that they're the kind of people Microsoft would support. Ah... A world full of Bill Gates look alikes. That's just what we need eh! I'm surprised he wasn't their hero?? lol

    121. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps your definition of "computer geek" is based on a limited stereotype. While there are computer geeks who are like this, if I were you I would be very cautious with the use of the word "most".

      Or perhaps my definition is too expansive; I don't count everybody who is interested in computers as a "computer geek"; only those who are more successful than average in pursuing that interest. These people -- in my (admittedly limited) experience -- tend to be generally intelligent about non-computer related things, as well, and have a very reasonable perspective about things (despite being pretty arrogant and egotistical).

      In any case, what you describe sounds to me like a description of someone who has a minor personality disorder and is somewhat unidirectionally computer-oriented.

    122. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely in agreement.

      I could also easily get into MENSA based on IQ tests, but I've never really wanted to (although occasionally I've been curious about what kind of people I might meet). I'm not really attracted to the idea, and the fact is that I've never encountered any positive comments about MENSA membership...

      Personally, I have intelligent people in my social circles who I find it extremely rewarding to talk with about just about any issue imaginable - even when I strongly disagree with them - none of whom are members of MENSA, although I strongly suspect that most of them could be if they wanted to.

    123. Re:So what ? by lasfinest · · Score: 1

      I've been a member of Mensa for several years now. Mensa explicitly does not endorse any political parties nor stances, so how can one state they hold Bush on a pedistal. Bush is certainly the butt of many jokes in the group I'm affiliated with. Most members seem to me, for the most part, to be on the quiet, progressive side, with a vocal conservative minority. IQ has nothing to do with personality and Mensa has members of all types of personalities. They have always been kind and respectfull to me. I'm sorry if this has not been the experience for some former members voicing their opinions. Regional Mensa groups seem to develop their own personalities as well so it isn't fair to damn the entire group based upon one regional group.

    124. Re:So what ? by lasfinest · · Score: 1

      God, I can't believe all the BS poeple are making up over this Mensa issue. I'm a member and I can't believe all the crap that's being written here. I have not met any pompus asses in the club. They have always been kind to me. They mostly keep quiet about it and just get together to party. Geez people, lighten up! You haven't a clue what you are talking about. Mensa is a great organization and I'm glad I found them. There are no nicer people that one could hang with. They're young, old, teens, Gen X & Y, and really don't care if others make up stories about them. But I'm just blown away by the misconceptions I'm reading here.

    125. Re:So what ? by ltbarcly · · Score: 1

      Yea, well, members of the Flat Earth Society have a higher IQ on average than any political party.

      See why it doesn't matter yet?

      Of course most rich people are Republicans. Is that really a suprise? Most poor people are Democrats? Holy crap, this is blowing my mind. Now, what you're trying to tell me is that when people make alot of money, they vote for the party that favors people with alot of money? JESUS. I can't wrap my mind around this astonishing fact. Now, you say that professors don't vote republican, but do make alot of money. So if I understand correctly, people who make alot of money vote Republican, but the people who get paid to think about things don't. How is this an argument that makes Republicans look good?

      Then you have to modify Professors with leftist/marxist. I'm pretty sure that any leftist/marxist would tend to lean, you know, away from voting Republican. It's just a hunch, but I imagine people with strong political beliefs tend to vote with those beliefs, instead of sabotaging themselves.

      Then there is the whole "leftist/marxist" labeling issue. Who uses this label? Why, holy crap, Republicans! So basically you, along with most Republicans (and most Democrats) believe in the Conspiracy of Ignorance. The Conspiracy of Ignorance is basically the view that whoever disagrees with your political beliefs secretly really agrees with you, but they are intentionally sabotaging things because they are evil. You can hear more about this daily on the Rush Limbaugh show.

      Oh, and you're an idiot.

    126. Re:So what ? by lasfinest · · Score: 1

      What BS! Mensa does not allow spouses to join if they cannot pass the tests. If you were a former member you would know this. What a phony post!

    127. Re:So what ? by ltbarcly · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clearly you are basing this on internet IQ tests.

      What you should know is that IQ is a measure of statistical deviation from the norm. All IQ tests are just given out to a bunch of people, and the average is taken to be 100. So you could design a test with no 'trivia' at all.

      Memorizing the answers simply wouldn't help you on a well designed test. Practising "obscure puzzles" probably would, as it would improve your ability to solve various puzzles. In the end, the only way you can gauge intelligence with a test is to ask questions, and this limits the type of intelligence you are testing for.

      Now, someone who scores a 120 is probably not noticably smarter than someone who scores a 119, or even (possibly) a 110. However, given 50 people with a measured IQ of 110, or 50 people with a measured IQ of 140, you had better believe that the group with the 140's is going to kick the crap out of the other group in any task requiring rapid learning or tasks which require thinking, even if you exhaustively and equally train each group.

      Saying you "resent" the dominant culture is a tell, although it isn't at all clear what you are talking about. A well designed IQ test could be given to a person from China just as well as a person from America, and if you think the cultures are simmilar then you have some kind of weird definition of culture.

      Of course, all IQ tests devised by a technological society are going to be biased toward thinking which is useful in such a society. When you give, say, a plant identification test to a member of a non-technological society they will completely drop kick anyone from the industrialized world. However, if you took these two people, and gave them simmilar upbringing and education, then gave them both an IQ test, one might greatly outscore the others. All else being equal and random, you could never guess which person would score better ahead of time, as intelligence doesn't vary much between genetic groups, most measured differences being a result of education and, even more so in the case of raw intelligence, of nutrition.

      Now, it is obvious that people enjoy what they are good at, and thus practice it, and become better. Is there any persuit that doesn't have this trait? (maybe kareokee) This doesn't make someone a lapdog. In fact, refusing to cooperate merely out of some sense of self pity or anger, and not a weighing of potential benifits and costs, is a sign of a truely low IQ.

    128. Re:So what ? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      You have a high IQ but not enough brainpower to install a spellchecker?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    129. Re:So what ? by coopaq · · Score: 0

      Blasphemer!!!

    130. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Most of the people I know in Mensa are rabid ANTI-Bushites."

      So? Being intelligent has nothing to do with being smart. Some intelligent people are also smart; smart people like Bush and know that he's on the right path.

      Methinks that maybe you've been educated BEYOND your intelligence.

    131. Re:So what ? by Y2 · · Score: 1
      Almost half of Mensa members are spouses of those with 98%+ IQs. You couldn't very well leave someone's husband or wife out of a primarily social organization.

      Utterly and completely wrong. All members must achieve a 98th percentile score on an intelligence test. There are no "members by marriage," although there are many married couples who are members.

      Spouses are welcome to attend events (as are just-good-friends), but they are not necessarily members.

      This is not a blanket defense of Mensa or its members. There are idiots in Mensa. However, they are idiots who scored high on an intelligence test.

      --
      "But all your emitter and collector are belong to me!"
    132. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bob who takes a bunch of tests, and pays a fee so that he can carry a card around that says he is smarter the 98% of the population.

      Is that what you think the members get for their money? Truly?

      Then you know nothing about it.

    133. Re:So what ? by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      And what happens when all the genii is already members and there is a funding crisis for the organization? Why, dumb-down the acceptance critera of course!

    134. Re:So what ? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I joined in high school because I thought it'd be something good to put on college applications. I quit when I found how obnoxious all of their communications were. I've not wanted anything to do with them since.

    135. Re:So what ? by Nasarius · · Score: 1
      Gosh, better tell physicists to stop studying physics and take up literature if they want to understand your so called "real world" then. ;)

      Ah, so true. If you can interpret literature, you understand human culture and psychology to some extent. Great. If you understand science, you know how the universe works -- and how to learn more about it.

      There's nothing wrong with the liberal arts. But you do have to understand that much of it is bullshit. I know several artists who freely admit as much. In many cases it's nearly impossible to tell the difference because of the non-objectivity. It's very difficult to bullshit science and not have your peers laugh in your face.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    136. Re:So what ? by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      This is not true. The studies I have read say that people watching Democratic shows like The Daily Show are more informed and more intelligent and have a higher income and degree and knowledge about local and world events than those who watch O'Reilley Factor. As well, the Republican party has more minorities and foreign-born nationals than they ever have before. The Republican party also has the majority of people who have the lowest income and are farmers and other such work, and more religious and less scientific. Saying the Democrats are poorer or less educated is a joke. All the top states for education are also Democratic. Grow up.

    137. Re:So what ? by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      Isn't it possible that 90% of Mensa might hate bush, but not bother voting because if 90% of them are against Bush, the vote would be against Bush anyway, and so they didn't feel a need to vote? And, the 10% who love Bush, all specifically DID cast their vote, because they knew that every loving-Bush vote would need to be cast for him to win? Isn't this a possibility why Bush won? And I am not just speaking about the Mensa poll, but the 2004 election as well. :)

    138. Re:So what ? by xintegerx · · Score: 1

      The only purpose of an IQ test is to have a quantitative data of a kid's logical, cognitive, and motor ability that can be written on a piece of paper in the form of a number instead of just words--their "Intelligence Quotient"--so that a psychiatrist feels validated in his analysis and profession and feels a bit like he is a scientist. The IQ is not and was not meant to be something to mean anything other than a test for these kids who are clearly functioning below normal standards. The Mensa is a joke and an entertaining proposition that should not be taken seriously by the outside world, nor by the members themselves. It should just be seen as a chat room in a bar.

    139. Re:So what ? by claes · · Score: 1

      That proves that this question is bad. Both answers are correct, depending on who you ask, right?

    140. Re:So what ? by composer777 · · Score: 1

      Well, I think to be more accurate, there isn't a way to cram for standardized tests. At least that's what I think they mean when they tell you that you can't study for the SAT, ACT, IQ tests, etc. But the fact is, you can study for SAT and ACT tests, and a booming industry has formed around it. If IQ really mattered, I'm sure there would be an industry focused on how to study for the IQ test.

      I agree that you are likely to find both sides of the republican vs. democrat dichotomy represented well in Mensa circles. Probably for different reasons than you do. I think that the whole dichotomy between the two parties is a false one, it's kind of an opiate for the true believers, those solid citizens who have bought into the dominant culture. Then there is the rest of us, who are too jaded and cynical to buy into the bullshit of either party. We tend to be in the lower, less educated classes.

    141. Re:So what ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Rote learning of batting averages is memory, not intelligence. I must have missed the memo where they were merged.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    142. Re:So what ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      I've known some incredibly intelligent people who'd probably flunk these tests - folks that can play music so amazingly well and reproduce exact notes after hearing them just once.
      Musical talent isn't intelligence. Heck, some birds can do that.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    143. Re:So what ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      All liberal arts disciplines are basically storytelling, so if you can do, say, literary criticism, you can blag your way in, say, history.

      That doesn't work between physics and chemistry, but I still find many L.A. snobs who think they know everything.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    144. Re:So what ? by metlin · · Score: 1

      Mathematical talent isn't intelligence.

      Hell, even inanimate things like computers can do that.

      Your point?

    145. Re:So what ? by Rubyflame · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but this is one of my pet peeves. What's a beaurocrat? A member of a beauro?

      --

      All it takes is nukes and nerves.
    146. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rote learning of batting averages is memory, not intelligence.

      No different from memorizing a bunch of UNIX commands.

    147. Re:So what ? by drooling-dog · · Score: 1

      The question isn't "bad"; in fact it does exactly what it is designed to do, and pretty effectively at that!

    148. Re:So what ? by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Intelligence is just a measure of how quickly you can learn. It does not measure if you will bother to learn or if you are capable of making effective use of what you learn or your ability to apply common sense to any degree at all.

      The sad part of this story is a group that was supposedly pursuing knowledge as it's own reward has sold itself out in the pursuit of marketing dollars instead (so philosophically speaking the American Mensa society has declard that "Greed is God").

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    149. Re:So what ? by SanGrail · · Score: 1

      That's what I find interesting about 'intelligence' in different areas, it's really just an approach, but interestingly it often doesn't cross subject areas.

      E.g. with a computer, if I don't know what to do (ie instruction manual), I'll pay attention, I'll take a look at the options available to me, choose the most likely, and experiment til I've got it working. After a while, standard behaviours and layout are familiar enough that it's even easier to figure out how new programs work.
      Someone who doesn't have that, will not be paying as much attention (it's not an interest to them), rather than experimenting, they freeze because they don't want to screw up, and they never get familiar enough with the underlying concepts to feel comfortable.

      Now, I am so not a cooking geek. Some people just walk into a kitchen, and there's food, and different spices, and they just put it all together and it tastes fabulous, whereas I burn things, misread instructions even if I have them, and have 'the fear' when it comes to randomly adding things, because I don't want to stuff it up.

      And yet... isn't it just the same?
      Yes, I could fuck up my computer just the same, and when I was a kid, I did several times, and I learned from that. Yes, I could just use the 'instruction manual' when it comes to cooking, but why do I stuff up even with it, when I don't need one with most computer software?

      I've seen the same things when it comes to cars, sewing, art, math, chemistry, all sorts of things...
      Often, it's because people have a preconceived notion of what they'll find fun, and what they will be bad at, and then the 'Attitude' with which they approach these tasks kinda becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

      And therefore, I try and be patient when I'm helping a non-computer geek, because I know there's probably another area in which they could way out-geek me, and if I can help them, maybe they'll get past 'the fear' and start to believe that they actually like computers, and get 'the attitude' necessary to be a computer geek, or at least proficient user.

      --
      ---- I've fallen, and I can't get up.
    150. Re:So what ? by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      How can something be 'bullshit' if by your own admission there is no objective critera?

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    151. Re:So what ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Rubbish comparison. Computers (or rather, the software running on them) generally aren't very good at 'puzzles'; they're good at doing repetitive things that they have been programmed to do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    152. Re:So what ? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Which is different from figuring how to combine those commands to solve a new problem efficiently.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    153. Re:So what ? by webhat · · Score: 1

      Every so often I go round these sites and do their tests which then tell me I'm eligable. I then write then a mail and ask them how much they want to pay me to join.

      They don't get the joke and explain that I have to pay them, how stupid are these smart people?

      What can I say, smart people get bored too... ;)

      --
      'I am become Shiva, destroyer of worlds'
    154. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No the MENSA members (that have volunteered that information) that I've met so far have not struck me as either very well educated or exceptionally smart. Maybe they're above average in some way.


      A friend used to refer to MENSA as Underacheivers Anonymous.

    155. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bullshit if the person saying it knows it. And if you're an artist, you can smell it from a mile away. It's just knowing who you're dealing with.

    156. Re:So what ? by lamber45 · · Score: 1
      Poster: Further, many of the questions on IQ tests tend to be what are known as "trick" questions. The only way that most mortals can do well on such a test is to blindly memorize the answers.

      AC: There is no way to "memorize" the answers to most standardized tests.

      You do realize there are ways to test for actual intelligence, which includes, of course, problem solving and ability to memorize?

      A lot of I.Q.-ish "standardized" tests do test things that are presumably useful in any "brain-work" situation, like

      • fast arithmetic ability
      • pattern-matching
      • vocabulary
      • ability to make inferences
      • However, as one who has taken a lot of standardised tests (most recently the LSAT, a GRE subject test, and the ASVAB), I can say that a lot of the questions really are "trick" questions. Look at
      • the MENSA sample test (you may not get the exact same set of questions). How many times have I seen a short sequence of low powers of prime numers? How many times have I had to know that 2 squared plus 3 squared is 5 squared? People regularly "study for" the SAT by memorizing pages from a thesaurus... Am I a better writer if I contemplate, ponder and pontificate using only the most erudite prose, or should I just say what I mean using words that my audience will understand immediately?

        By the way, I didn't vote for Bush, but I did volunteer to serve in his army, and was turned down. I earned a high ASVAB score and passed the medical exam/drug screen, but a security interviewer allegedly thought I was "too honest".

    157. Re:So what ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a member of Mensa BE (Belgian Mensa) since 2001 and I must say thet outside the US people did discuss the 09/11 attacks and did question G.W.B. and his motives. There's over 100.000 Mensans out there and I can assure you that in most countries there's a lot of people opposed to the Bush-doctrine. Just as there are people for it. We openly and freely discuss (world)politics on an international level and it is indeed remarkable that there are so many Americans who do not question what they are force-fed by society and the media. Even the brightest minds can be misled... just remember Adolf Hitler's scientific researchers.

  2. has to be said by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mensa will put MSN's search on their new homepage.

    That's not very smart.

    1. Re:has to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Think about it again.

      People have to pay to Google if they want to use Google's search engine in their website. But Microsoft has to pay to people to get them to use MSN's search on their website.

  3. Mensa by Tango7 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's a quick link to the wikipedia entry on Mensa. Mensa Some info on what Mensa's goals are. Mensa has three stated purposes: to identify and foster human intelligence for the benefit of humanity; to encourage research in the nature, characteristics, and uses of intelligence; and to promote stimulating intellectual and social opportunities for its members. (from wikipedia)

    1. Re:Mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you gotta wonder, why on earth is MS affiliated with them!?

    2. Re:Mensa by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      So long as they don't have a "life is short/but the days are long" pass-phrase, I doubt there's much to worry about.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Mensa by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
      to identify and foster human intelligence for the benefit of humanity; to encourage research in the nature, characteristics, and uses of intelligence;
      I don't see how they intend to do that. If people below the standard aren't allowed in and Mensa doesn't have outreach programs, then I think that they are hard pressed to reach those 2 goals.

      Perhaps they intend to do things through their own personal relationships. That doesn't seem too wise to me.
    4. Re:Mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have lots of ideas.

    5. Re:Mensa by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. I appreciate it. It's not what I had in mind, but it definitely fits the bill whether I agree with it or not.

  4. The power of MSN and Mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If there was ever a group of self-important dweebs who deserved each other more, I can't imagine it.

    1. Re:The power of MSN and Mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can. I'm posting on it.

    2. Re:The power of MSN and Mensa by Cobblepop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry you couldn't get in.

    3. Re:The power of MSN and Mensa by Grizzlysmit · · Score: 1
      If there was ever a group of self-important dweebs who deserved each other more, I can't imagine it.
      Yep the company of the over sized ego's team up with the club for those with over sized ego's, it fits.
      --
      in my life God comes first.... but Linux is pretty high after that :-D
      Francis Smit
    4. Re:The power of MSN and Mensa by gordo3000 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Slashdot;-)?

    5. Re:The power of MSN and Mensa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? What's slashdotsemicolondashleftparenthesisquestionmark

  5. Go right ahead by bonch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This will have what...zero effect?

    People love Google. I actually saw Jay Leno mention Google as part of a related joke, and some in the audience began cheering and applauding.

    Makes one think Mensa is rather...retarded.

    1. Re:Go right ahead by christopher240240 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, but Jay Leno is not funny.

    2. Re:Go right ahead by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      He's funny looking and, quite frankly, that's enough for me.

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
    3. Re:Go right ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Makes one think Mensa is rather...retarded.

      Part of my bilingual brain found this sequence of words familiar...

      "mensa" is the feminin of "menso" that means retarded or stupid in some latin cultures.
      *grin*

      _P@

    4. Re:Go right ahead by phrasebook · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and some in the audience began cheering and applauding.

      Americans always cheer and applaud over everything! I've often wondered why this is. Americans: why do you feel the need to clap or shout 'yee-eah!' or 'woooo!' when you agree with something someone is saying?

      Two examples: Most recently I was listening to an address made by a respected journalist, can't remember the name. It was a serious kind of speech but people kept clapping whenever he made a point. It was lame. I felt like the audience was desparate to tell the guy they could understand him and that they weren't dumb and were keeping up. You could tell he wasn't ready for this applause and the stopping/starting it caused.

      Second example was an inquiry, something to do with 11/9 where senators were questioning someone from the CIA or somesuch. One of the senators was making a point about accountability, just a regular point made in a confident manner. And people in the background starting saying 'yeah!' and applauding. The senator quickly cut them off though and said "no, don't clap, don't clap" and looked annoyed, and tried to keep talking.

      I just find this behaviour strange, and it seems to be unique to the USA. Is this just people being enthusiastic, and are all Americans so enthusiastic?

    5. Re:Go right ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Americans always cheer and applaud over everything!

      Um, I haven't had that sort of experience. Were the examples you quoted televised? In my experience, TV audiences tend to clap and cheer much more than other audiences (think of talk shows, sitcoms, street interviews... whatever). The Jay Leno audience in particular usually seems hyperenthusiastic about the most mundane things. On the other hand, most of the stage performances I've attended seem to have a much quieter and saner audiences. I don't know why.

    6. Re:Go right ahead by mzieg · · Score: 1
      Off the top of my head, I would guess this is an expression of the American reflex for democracy and freedom of expression. That is, if a crowd of people are gathered and an opinion is uttered, Americans automatically feel they have a right to "vote" on the worth of that opinion. Cheering and applause is the simplest expression of that vote.

      While things like Slashdot, blogs, Civilian Band and short-wave radio, "letters to the editor", and so forth are all found in other countries (and many originated beyond our borders), I don't think there are many other countries in which the populace has so determinedly availed themselves of the right and indeed responsibility to exercise and express their capacity for critical judgement.

      I'm aware that not every opinion is equally well-considered or defensible, and that some in other cultures will consider this American insistance on reactive involvement to be obnoxious and even counter-productive. However, it certainly keeps the free flow of ideas alive, and makes things like Slashdot more fun :-)

      Representative institutions are of little value, and may be a mere instrument of tyranny or intrigue, when the generality of electors are not sufficiently interested in their own government to give their vote...
      John Stuart Mill, Representative Government, 1861
      The ultimate good desired is better reached by free trade in ideas. The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market.
      Mr. Justice Holmes, Abrams vs. United States, 1919
      It is impossible, if no more than one opinion is uttered, to make choice of the best: a man is forced then to follow whatever advice may have been given him; but if opposite speeches are delivered, then choice can be exercised.
      Herodotus, on freedom of discussion
    7. Re:Go right ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is how you find Americans in the dark. You whisper "Go USA" and they'll be shouting "WOO!!!!!!! YEAH!!!!!!!!!!! AWESOME!!!!!!!!!!!"

    8. Re:Go right ahead by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      Woohoo way to go phrasebook! Yee-eah! You tell him.

    9. Re:Go right ahead by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      What does November 9th have to do with my being an American again?

    10. Re:Go right ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

      clearly it's always said as "9/11" and he knows that - who the hell says "11/9?" i think he's just too proud to stoop to our low american level and put the month first.

    11. Re:Go right ahead by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Oh YES baby, Americans get extremely agitated in crowds. Out here in Singapore, we often have visiting performers (musicians, comedians, buskers etc) who invariably are bemused by the local audience's reactions to their performances; they often have to say, "C'mon guys give us a clap" (or something like that) to get some sort of a reaction from the audience. Never fails to amuse me. :-)

    12. Re:Go right ahead by magefile · · Score: 1

      Non-americans do this too. Example: in Germany (and Austria, perhaps other Germanic nations), as you are talking, the listener will often say, "uh-huh" every few seconds. For an American (even one who has experienced it before) this is very unnerving, and it may be difficult to continue talking, because *in* *American* *society* it means that the "uh-huh"'er wants to interject. But to a Germanic person, it means, "I'm with you, I understand, keep going". It all has to do with different styles of communication of audience approval and interest.

    13. Re:Go right ahead by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      "Late Night with Conan O'Brien", which airs after Jay Leno's show on NBC, follows the same basic format as all the other late night talk shows. Every night, the audience starts cheering when Conan O'Brien mentions something as setup for a joke. And Conan always mocks them for it. So, at least on late night talk shows, it's pretty much established behavior.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    14. Re:Go right ahead by Obfiscator · · Score: 1

      I gave a presentation earlier this week at a conference. There was a Greek man there who asked me a question. As I fumbled through my response (total brain failure), he kept nodding his head, even though I was giving him the wrong answer and he knew it (it was pointed out to me afterwards by my advisor, who happned to be talking with him).

      If he shook his head while I was responding to him, I might have panicked and made things worse, so the nodding was probably a good thing. Happens to everyone now and again.

      --
      "Nothing shocks me. I'm a scientist." -Indiana Jones
    15. Re:Go right ahead by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      • Most recently I was listening to an address made by a respected journalist, can't remember the name. It was a serious kind of speech but people kept clapping whenever he made a point. It was lame. I felt like the audience was desparate to tell the guy they could understand him and that they weren't dumb and were keeping up.

      That's because we're so used to journalists and so-called experts considering us to have the intellectual capacity of a UN politician that when someone speaks to us intelligently, we get excited, even if we think the person is wrong.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    16. Re:Go right ahead by phrasebook · · Score: 1

      Actually I thought "September 11th" which comes out as 11/9. But yeah 911 would be the more popular way, I don't mind really.

    17. Re:Go right ahead by christopher240240 · · Score: 1

      Whoa, a pissed of Jay Leno fan moderator. I sure would hate to run into you in a dark alley...

  6. To sum up: by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 5, Funny

    To sum up everyone's responses to this:
    1. No one respects Mensa since they base their membership on tests of dubious veracity and not on real world accomplishments.
    2. And signing up with a deal with MSN kind of just drives the point home, doesn't it?

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:To sum up: by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. I can't decide whether the point of this deal is for Mensa to drive MSN's reputation into the ground, or the other way around.

    2. Re:To sum up: by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      MSN has a reputation?
      I guess if they have a reputation, its "another generic web portal", kind of like Yahoo!, only Yahoo!, as bland as it is, is rather useful.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    3. Re:To sum up: by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      Maybe MSN is trying to get the last laugh, by saying, "Look at how stupid they were to sign a deal with us!! Lol! Lol! Hey, wait a minute...".

    4. Re:To sum up: by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Nope, they both conspired to drive Electronic Arts' reputation into the ground.

    5. Re:To sum up: by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 1

      Um, aren't they getting paid for 15 seconds worth of work? To put a link on their page pointing to one search engine rather than another? That's real dumb of them aint it...

      --
      Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  7. Too bad.... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Funny

    featuring Mensa questions on the MSN homepage, and Mensa will put MSN's search on their new homepage.

    Whatever, that's fine with me.

    It's just really too bad they keep spelling it "Msna".

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Too bad.... by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      You can't spell Mensa without M S N...

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    2. Re:Too bad.... by djcapelis · · Score: 1

      Embrace and extend, embrace and extend.

      My god, could you imagine the horrid creation that would be?

      Mensa and Microsoft fused together to... yikes.

      --
      I touch computers in naughty places
    3. Re:Too bad.... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Closed source logic puzzles...

    4. Re:Too bad.... by juaja · · Score: 1

      I think is just as bad now as it can be, I'm mexican and here the word "mensa" is applied to dumb people (femenine, menso for masculine), strange huh?

      --
      I HAVEN'T OWNED A TELEVISION SINCE 1967 AND ONLY WATCH MOVIES ABOUT LEFT-HANDED ALEUT LESBIAN PIPEWELDERS! FUCK HOLLYWOO
  8. Karma Whore by mtrisk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Here's a quick link to the wikipedia entry on Karma Whore. Karma Whore Some info on what Karma Whore's goals are. Karma Whore has three stated purposes: to post information about a topic that everyone already knows; to link to wikipedia, because wikipedia pwns; and most importantly, to sell his/her brain to slashdot in order to whore karma. (from my cortex)

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:Karma Whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true!

    2. Re:Karma Whore by Wieland · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that read: "Here's a quick link to freeipods.com"?

  9. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope. Why would anyone want to join a group dedicated to comparing mental dick size?

  10. Does this actually matter? by dcclark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Call me cynical, but how many people will this affect in any way? I see Google or MSN search boxes on all sorts of pages, but I never use them. They seem like a strange relic, more of a "Look what I can add to my site!" element. If I want to search for something, I'll go to Google itself or the handy-dandy search box in my browser's toolbar.

    On the other side of things, I can't ever find ANYTHING on the horribly busy and disorganized MSN homepage anyhow, so I'm not sure MENSA questions on there will even be noticed.

    Given all of that... if MENSA has someone new to feed them money for events, more power to them. I don't think there's anything to really care about here.

    1. Re:Does this actually matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MENSA is not an abbreviation, so why have you written in it upper case? Seriously, I really want to know why. Please reply.

  11. MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
    From their eligiblity page: http://www.us.mensa.org/join_mensa/testscores.php3

    Among many options, one only needs 1300 (out of 1600) on SAT. These days, MANY people easily get 1300. How many is many? 1300 ranks about 90%tile; which means, about 10% have 1300 or better...and that's only EACH test session. Even you can easily qualify for this so-called high IQ society, go to their parties to feed on your self-centered ego

    1. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 2, Informative
      ...and the top ten percent know they are smart, they don't need to join a support group to have other people tell them that.

      Mensa is not really a society of smart people, it is a society of insecure people...who happened to pass a puzzle test.

    2. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Eel+IzCool · · Score: 3, Informative

      That was for an older version of the SAT. The SAT no longer measures IQ, apparently. Also, on that version, I would guess that a 1300 was around the 98th percentile, because they let the top 2% of people in. ALSO, it should be noted that Mensa is a high IQ society, not a high intelligence society (Though some people suggest defining intelligence as what IQ measures...) ALSO ALSO, sometimes I think about trying to join Mensa, mostly just so I could meet more people. And to rub in my friends faces.

    3. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by greg1104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      > Among many options, one only needs 1300 (out of 1600) on SAT. These days, MANY people easily get 1300.

      You don't get a qualifying Mensa reading comprehension score with this statement. You need a >1300 if you took test before 9/30/74, back when it was hard. They clearly state that they haven't considered the SAT to correlate with IQ for over ten years now; 1994 was the last year they accepted those scores.

    4. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Jetson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Though some people suggest defining intelligence as what IQ measures...

      The tests for IQ have been changing a lot over the last few decades. Groups like Mensa pretend there's only one score and admit based on that value. If you were to get a proper psychological work-up the doctors would actually conduct several different IQ tests (to measure verbal, performance and average IQ) and then list specific IQ values for each portion of each test. They can then compare, say, your "math IQ" to your "logic IQ" to make determinations about your personality and actual skills. In particular, they look at the variances to determine where a person is gifted and where they are developmentally delayed. You could have a verbal IQ of 140 and a performance IQ of 60 and a traditional test would say you were "normal" (your IQ was 100) when you're actually autistic....

      The other thing that has changed about the IQ tests is the method and rating scale. Older IQ tests (even from the 80's) were biased in favour of a bell-curve result so that two people of similar near-average intelligence would be significantly contrasted while the difference between the "bright" and the "super genius" was compacted. Anyone who scores more than about 140 on a general IQ test should get re-tested using a more modern (more linear and usually open-ended scale) test designed to measure accurately at higher levels.

    5. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the top ten percent know they are smart, they don't need to join a support group

      Mensa is the top two percent, you insensitive clod. A two percent minority in anything is entitled to a support group. (For when the other 98 percent finds them unbearably annoying and decides to beat the snot out of them.)

    6. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As someone who qualifies for Mensa (tested as a child), but doesn't want to join, I have two things to say.

      1) It is a little odd that exclusive clubs exist for many things, and nobody cares, but as soon as an exclusive club for "intelligent" people is set up, people bitch incessantly. The problem is that Mensa doesn't acknowledge the shortcomings in their own tests. I have heard Mensa representatives (including the head of the NZ chapter) state, time and again, that the tests "can't be studied for", and that a person can't change their test result by doing IQ test questions over and over.

      This is crap. It is obviously incorrect to anyone who has ever taken a test of anything, and betrays the weak point of the entire Mensa qualification - it is based on knowledge as much as it is on native intelligence. It makes assumptions about the average amount of knowledge in certain areas that people of certain age groups have, and extrapolates from that. It is easily affected by study, repetitive testing, or reading up in associated areas.
      That could be why there is a lot of contempt for them from people who are of equal intelligence.

      2) I don't want to join a group who's primary goal is to exclude others. I would rather be a part of a group that had open membership, but just showed a strong interest in promoting intellectual pursuits, critical thinking, and the fun of using one's abilities (no matter what they were) to their fullest. It would be more inclusive, do much more good, and would quickly sort itself out in terms of the level and quality of members.

      Mensa could have been a good idea - it is just poorly executed, and based on flawed premises.

    7. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MENSA is too smart. We are more smarter than most people. Your just jealous.

    8. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tests for IQ have been changing a lot over the last few decades. Groups like Mensa pretend there's only one score and admit based on that value.

      No. They don't pretend there is only "one score". There are many tests you can use to qualify. You only have to score in the top 2% of one of them to be admitted.

    9. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by fyoder · · Score: 1
      I was a member briefly a few years ago. Two different tests were administered, and you only had to pass *one* to get in. I failed one, but still got in on the results of the other.

      Reading the national publication (this was in Canada), a major concern seemed to be low membership.

      It seemed to me that the 98th percentile and above thing was something of an impediment to increasing membership. Consequently increasing precision of testing may not be in their interest. Perhaps they'll come up with a more subjective test where the marker can say things like "close enough" or "not really, but part marks".

      "Congratulations, you're in. Please pay us your membership fee. Thanks, here is a shiny gold colored pin."

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    10. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should anyone get IQ tested at all, I wonder. I've been consistently one of the brightest people I know over the course of my life, at least in the traditional "hard science" subjects (I don't mean to brag--I'm being anonymous, after all--but you do tend to notice these things), but I don't recall if I've ever been IQ tested; doubtless if I had been tested at an early age, I would have been baffled at why I was doing such a thing, and not give it too much thought. Sure, I'd be curious to see where I fall on an IQ scale, but I've had to take enough tests for other purposes that I know where I stand, more or less, and I don't need the validation of having an integer score to flag around to say, "Yes, I have an IQ of X, nyea nyea nyea, bite me." I suppose some occupations require an IQ test (they don't let completely mentally and emotionally stunted brain-dead neuro-patients join the military where, you know, they have to fire guns and stuff at other people), but I can't think of many occupations that would go to the trouble of administering or requiring such a thing.

    11. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Jetson · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Should have been clearer. If Mensa was serious about admitting only the cream of the crop, their testing and admission standards would be more comprehensive and not boil down to a single passing mark.

    12. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Jetson · · Score: 1
      Reading the national publication (this was in Canada), a major concern seemed to be low membership. It seemed to me that the 98th percentile and above thing was something of an impediment to increasing membership.

      It probably doesn't help that the people at the very top of the intellectual food chain have no interest in membership in an ego-stroking society. Most of the geniuses I know are (for the most part) antisocial eccentrics who care more about their work than what goes on in the world around them. I personally took their entrance exam (and passed) almost 25 years ago. I didn't see much point in joining then, and even less now. I have more fun hanging around with "normal" people.

    13. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      doubtless if I had been tested at an early age, I would have been baffled at why I was doing such a thing, and not give it too much thought

      Been there, done that. When I was 9 years old my family moved and the new school system did a series of tests that I thought were simply intended to find out what grade I should go into. In retrospect, I now know they were measuring more than just intellect -- the testing included social questions and dexterity/balance checks in addition to the usual math, comprehension and symbol/pattern tests. Asperger's Syndrome wasn't a diagnosable condition back then, and they were trying to figure out whether my hyperlexia meant I was retarded, gifted or both.

      It's rather meaningless to say I have an average IQ of 142 because it doesn't tell you anything about my capabilities or limitations. If I tell you my verbal IQ is 164 and my performance IQ is 120 then that says something. (Actually, an IQ gap of 44 points says quite a lot...)

    14. Re:MENSA is not THAT smart.. by BubbaJonBoy · · Score: 1

      1st off - Mensa does NOT use just one test. When I was tested they used two - one targeted for the US population and the other for Great Britain. This is to balance out cultural biases in the tests. It is my understanding they do this for all regions.
      2nd - Mensa's intent was not to give a bunch of arrogant so-and-so's a "home". It is a social group for similarly gifted people to get together. So WTF is wrong with that? Might as well direct the same comments to people that "belong" to /.! Instead of IQ tests we have moderators who weight and sift the Trolls and FlameBait from the Interesting and Funny. Too bad we can't do that up front instead of being afflicted on a constant basis.
      What really annoys me is the way people immediately slap an "elitist" tag on Mensans and feel free to heap ridicule and abuse upon their heads without knowing one thing about them - what they do, what they think, who they are.
      So tell me - would you direct these comments at Buckminster Fuller, or Isaac Asimov? Both were noted Mensans. They saw a benefit to the society and believed it was worth their time.
      Regards,
      BubbaJonBoy

  12. I couldn't agree more... by absurdist · · Score: 1
    I've been invited to join MENSA. I've also gone to a few of their meetings. Essentially what they were were a number of individuals of dubious accomplishment and substantially lacking in social skills attempting to one-up each other and show how they were smarter than anyone else in the room. What a bunch of WOMBATs.

    "I wouldn't belong to any club that would have me as a member." - Groucho Marx

  13. I had to say it..... [sorry] by Jeff+Benjamin · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else see the irony here?

    1. Re:I had to say it..... [sorry] by NanotechLobster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *raises hand* Oooh! Oooh! I do!

  14. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know what, I didn't. I've never felt the need.

    Frankly, I'm not the "worrier" type who needs the justification of a test to prove (s)he's as good as (s)he thinks (s)he is. I've done it and I'm proud of what I've done.

    I'm a clever guy - I've excelled in every academic test I've ever taken. (14 'O' levels, 6 'A' levels, 2 'S' levels, a Physics degree from IC, London, and a PhD at KCL). I have more qualifications (in spades) than 99% of people I've met. I don't see the need to be an arrogant SOB because of that. I've set up, run for a few years and successfully sold a company at an excellent profit. I've pretty much done it all - I'm now working in a dream job for a cool company in California and enjoying every minute of it.

    And, in case you were thinking along the lines of privileged education etc., my mother is an estate agent, my father a docker, and I was the first in my family to ever go to University. Everyone has, since.

    I *do* value intelligence (hell, I require it of interviewees). I just don't value Mensa tests. They're about as useful a measure of basic intelligence as the colour of the sky is of tomorrow's weather. "Red sky at night" will get you so far, but it's only a weighted average. Point made, I think.

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  15. The intended effect vs. the actual effect by Stick_Fig · · Score: 1
    The Intended Effect: "Hey, smart people use Microsoft products! I should too!"

    The Actual Effect: "Man, we're not very smart! We wasted all that money on the search program nobody uses."

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    1. Re:The intended effect vs. the actual effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Intended Effect: "Hey, smart people use Microsoft products! I should too!"

      It will be exactly that. The deal is money driven (obviously).

  16. make sense by prockcore · · Score: 5, Funny

    It makes sense. A mensa membership carries about the same degree of prestige as an MSCE cert.

    (Read: none at all)

    1. Re:make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It makes sense. A mensa membership carries about the same degree of prestige as an MSCE cert.

      and yet jobs are offerred for MCSE's - never seen mensa on a job ad. It's easy to knock something you've never tried tho. Oh yeah - of course you wouldn't want to, can't be bothered wasting your time or (much more likely) don't really have a clue

      and no - i don't have mcse - but after looking through the material I can acknowledge that it does have some depth

    2. Re:make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a former member of mensa in germany and actual mcse i would like to point out that the mcse program provided me with useful information for some of the jobs i do.

    3. Re:make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've also been witness to people declined jobs because they have an MCSE and mention it. Obviously they're not told this to their face, but being on the other side of the table, it's something we have to stifle a laugh at when someone brings it up as some form of credential. I've also worked with 2 people who hid the fact that they had MCSEs, not only to get the job in the first place, but so they wouldn't be laughed at by their coworkers.

      Now, to answer your point that it has "some" depth. You're correct, there are jobs out there that an MCSE would help you get. The point here is though, those are the exact jobs you DON'T want to have. Any company clueless enough to consider an MCSE as having some intrinsic value doesn't have a clue as far as their IT is concerned. They are also usually of the mindset to hire a single qualified individual to handle the workload of what should be 3 people.

      You'd be much better invested getting your CCNA, Sun Solaris Admin or Oracle/SQL certification. Or using the money you would have spent on a MCSE bribing someone to get you a job.

    4. Re:make sense by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I'm an MCSE and I for one am insulted by you comparing me to a Mensa member!

    5. Re:make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least get the acronym right when you try to be Mr Funny. When you fuck up being a smartarse you look like a bigger dickhead than the people you are attempting to put down.

    6. Re:make sense by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah yeah, whatever. Don't you have an operating system to reinstall?

    7. Re:make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD PARENT UP!!!!

      That's the most sense anyone has made in the comments about this story.

      Mensa is a social club, not the freaking Freemasons. You take a test, you get in and you meet some people. If you fail, well it DOES NOT MATTER, it's just a social club.

      All the comments against Mensa here are probably from people who took the test and failed. Does anyone seriously think that people who haven't taken the test give two shits about Mensa? NO.

      Sour grapes all round here, but I wouldn't have expected anything more from bunch of pre-teen nerds.

    8. Re:make sense by daveb · · Score: 1
      >You're correct, there are jobs out there that an >MCSE would help you get. The point here is though, >those are the exact jobs you DON'T want to have. oh i don't know about that. I've just read an ACM article (don't have ref handy) which showed pretty conclusivly that HR managers use MCSE (etc) as a short list and that actual IT managers don't rate it that highly.

      I suspect that the gradparent is a troll - but I think they have a point. MCSE might get you past the HR manager whereas not having it won't - but then you have to convince the IT manager that you're not a tosser. THAT is the time to deprecate with comments like (if asked) "yeah - I got that because HR managers and clients seem to like it". and other things that make it obvious you don't hold yourself high just because of the cert

      I reckon that clients and HR people like qualifications (it's a saftey net for them) but that an IT department is more of a meritocracy - you are rated by your actual performance. Arrogant tossers are recognised pretty quickly regardless of the quals (and I'm starting to feel about PhD's the same way as MCSE too)

      but my background is support - wouldn't have a clue about software dev - YMMV

    9. Re:make sense by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      • I'm an MCSE and I for one am insulted by you comparing me to a Mensa member!

      I'm a Unix programmer and I for one would be insulted by your being insulted if I just weren't so damn bemused by someone having the /bravery|idiocy/ to admit to being an MCSE on slashdot.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    10. Re:make sense by Zurk · · Score: 1

      i normally dont post regarding my membership, but mensa is a social club and should be treated like one. when i move into a new area and have no friends, the only way to meet people who are at least above the average bar stool junkie is to join a mensa chapter and hang out with ppl playing D&D or whatever.
      some mensas suck and some are really really good. its a nice friendly atmosphere in general tho.

  17. Possibly silly theory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is a direct response to the Google Aptitude Test.

    Microsoft has been trying to coopt academia for years. Now I guess they're trying to coopt "smart people" before Google does.

    1. Re:Possibly silly theory. by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      Someone needs to mod this insightful as this is one of the few insightful comments I have seen so far in this thread. Most of the commentary on this topic has been essentially sour grapes.

      On the other hand, when the subject of the Google aptitude test is brought up on Slashdot everyone oohs and aahs about how wonderful said people are and how wonderful it would be to be admitted to the magical community of Page and Brin.

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. Star-Wars free association by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    For some reason, as I read this story the thought of Count Dooku aligning with the Sith just sprung to mind.

    Of course, I just finished watching all twenty Clone Wars cartoons for the first time...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Star-Wars free association by NonSequor · · Score: 1

      Your timing is impeccable. The first cartoon of Volume II airs on on Monday

      --
      My only political goal is to see to it that no political party achieves its goals.
  20. Top 2% of the population? by n0dalus · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the top 2% isn't that special.
    There are numerous other IQ societies that will only accept entrants with IQ's in the top 0.x%

    Maybe Google will sponsor the triple-9 society or some other higher IQ society to counteract this? (people with IQ's in the 99.9 percentile)

    1. Re:Top 2% of the population? by bonch · · Score: 1

      Maybe these upper-echelon factions battle each other in roving street gangs and hold random dance-offs whenever they meet each other on the street.

      "You got SERVED!" -- random uber-dork wearing Harry Potter glasses and cape

  21. Nothing more sad than MENSA by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 1, Troll
    The ultimate collection of smart losers, getting together to form a support group based loosely on the notion that although they have had sand kicked repeatedly in their faces, they will one day rule the earth because they can solve a word puzzle faster than their boss at work.

    No, they will continue to be smart losers and nothing more, which is why you will rarely find Nobel Prize winners, CEOs, or generally succesful people skulking in their midst.

    1. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by Federico2 · · Score: 1


      No, they will continue to be smart losers and nothing more, which is why you will rarely find Nobel Prize winners, CEOs, or generally succesful people skulking in their midst.


      Rarely? Are you so sure? Pls spend a minute to get a clue about it...

    2. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      Hrmm.. Now, I understand the general point people here are trying to make about Mensans being the smart losers who need a support group and, for some members, this may be true. I happen to be a member of Mensa and find these broad statements a little inapplicable to me. I am a member of Mensa who doesn't go to meetings, reads the newletters and magazines, enjoys the word puzzles and has people skills good enough to get aling with most anyone. So just do me a favor and acknowledge the fact that statements such as yours, though aplicable to some, does not apply to all of the oprganization's members.

      Thank you and, uhh, have a nice day! Ignore my typos.

    3. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by carling_ZA · · Score: 3, Interesting
      No, they will continue to be smart losers and nothing more, which is why you will rarely find Nobel Prize winners, CEOs, or generally succesful people skulking in their midst.
      Yes, losers like Scott Adams, Isaac Asimov and (my favourite) pr0n star Asia Carrera. Like always on Slashdot, you got modded up for not knowing anything at all about the subject under discussion... [retch] MSN [/retch] link to famous members:
      http://encarta.msn.com/list_famousmensamembers/Fam ous_Mensa_Members.html
    4. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by lxs · · Score: 1

      The ultimate collection of smart losers, getting together to form a support group based loosely on the notion that although they have had sand kicked repeatedly in their faces, they will one day rule the earth because they can solve a word puzzle faster than their boss at work.

      That almost sounds like slashdot (except for the 'smart' bit)

    5. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1

      Where does all the Mensa hostility come from? Mensa is not all that exclusive, millions of people in the US qualify... IQ tests are not perfect, but Mensa's standards are low enough that false -negatives- for the sort of person they want are surely rare. At least sometimes it could be a way to find diverse people sharing a deep kind of mental agreement. It seems to be a far more admirable basis for association than any common social pattern. And if it's a support group for the dysfunctionally intelligent, so what? Surely slashdot posters should understand the social isolation that can result from intelligence.

      That said, I've no personal experience with Mensa.

    6. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, losers like Scott Adams, Isaac Asimov and (my favourite) pr0n star Asia Carrera. Like always on Slashdot, you got modded up for not knowing anything at all about the subject under discussion... [retch] MSN [/retch] link to famous members...

      I call BS.

      There's no Asia Carrera link there.

      Jerk.

    7. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to be a member of Mensa and find these broad statements a little inapplicable to me

      Ohhh ..eh..inapp..inapplic...eh...I feel dumb..


      I am a member of Mensa who doesn't go to meetings, reads the newletters and magazines, enjoys the word puzzles and has people skills good enough to get aling with most anyone.

      Ehh...too complicated for me...does that mean that you (as a member of Mensa) do NOT enjoy word puzzles and do NOT have people skills??

      statements such as yours, though aplicable to some

      Oh...that word again..apli...

      Thank you and, uhh, have a nice day! Ignore my typos

      No, thank YOU sir. ;)

    8. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by Q+Who · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes, losers like Scott Adams, Isaac Asimov and (my favourite) pr0n star Asia Carrera. Like always on Slashdot, you got modded up for not knowing anything at all about the subject under discussion...

      From Isaac Asimov FAQ:

      Asimov joined Mensa, the high-IQ society, in the early 1960s, but found that many of the members were arrogant about their supposed intelligence, so he let his membership lapse. However when he moved back to New York, he became an active member once again, and gave speeches to groups of Mensans on a number of occasions. Yet once again membership became a burden for him, so he resigned from the group.
    9. Re:Nothing more sad than MENSA by Q+Who · · Score: 1

      Who's the idiot who modded my post redundant?

  22. Next week on slashdot... by xgamer04 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Breaking news! Microsoft partners with Johnson and Hollings Advertising firm! This is important because Johnson just had a baby! Microsoft and babies!!! What next?

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  23. Computer geeks. by Eunuch · · Score: 1

    Not too long in the future we will become melded into computers. So the computer geeks are essentially practicing for their role as gods.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:Computer geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not as smart or entertaining as you think you are, Neal Stephenson.

    2. Re:Computer geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i for one welcome our new geek overlords

    3. Re:Computer geeks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither are you, uh, Bruce Stirling.

  24. Mensa is great by bahwi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But trivia questions do not equal intelligence.

    My favorite I've seen is a Mensa sticker on a beat-up Honda with no rear-bumper. Yeah, probably a teacher or something, which is a great and noble profession, but whatever happened to spending 5 or 10 years and getting a nest-egg to live comfortably(at least to repair the car and make it street legal! this one was really bad!).

    Ah well, Mensa is the most intelligent Trivia people I've ever met, some are amazing and intelligence and pure genius, most are doped-up idiots. Sorry, even the country club will have intelligent people and idiots, Mensa is no different, no gold though.

    1. Re:Mensa is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My favorite I've seen is a Mensa sticker on a beat-up Honda with no rear-bumper. Yeah, probably a teacher or something, which is a great and noble profession, but whatever happened to spending 5 or 10 years and getting a nest-egg to live comfortably(at least to repair the car and make it street legal! this one was really bad!).

      On the other hand, maybe you just aren't smart enough to understand?

  25. Mensa, eh by truesaer · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think my GRE scores qualify me for Mensa...but I'm not inclined to join. To pay money to be part of a smart persons club that provides no real benefits other than status seems pretty dumb to me. Not quite as bad as sending money to a Nigerian prince, but not good either.


    Think about this for a minute...a good score on the GRE which consists of basic reading comprehension and 9th grade algebra gets you into a special smart persons club?

    1. Re:Mensa, eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know. In all honesty, I'm the smartest person I know... which just makes me lonely. I qualify for Mensa, and some of the more exclusive high-IQ societies, but I've never signed up. When I've considered doing so, it was always just in hopes of meeting people more like myself. I never bothered, because I'm too disillusioned with the possibility; even the smartest people I know through reading still don't seem to think like me except very rarely... There seems like a huge chasm between me and every other mind, no matter the intelligence, because it's a different -kind- of intelligence.

      Even posting this, all I'm really hoping for is a similar voice to join me. Anyone?

    2. Re:Mensa, eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read Alexander Hamilton (his writing, not just a biography). Seriously. I don't agree with half of what the guy has to say, but *damn*.

    3. Re:Mensa, eh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but intelligence (IQ) != smart.

      If you are intelligent and lonely, I'd say you're pretty stupid.

      Get over yourself and apply your stunning intellect to the rather simple problem of making yourself irresistable and indespensible to others. If you cannot, I submit that you are not so smart as you think. If you will not, then either you are lazy, insufferably arrogant or a coward.

      Okay so maybe you still won't be able to have a full-speed conversation with your new buddies, but at least you won't be lonely.

      The truly wickedly intelligent can pass through a bar full of construction workers while seeming to be one of them. Imagine something like Good Will Hunting, except that Will was easily identified by his buddies as being Too Smart For Minimum Wage.

      Read something about Richard Feynman if you need a role model for a brilliant man leading a balanced life. Remember that no matter how much you know you can't know it all, and no matter how much you are aware of you can't be aware of everything. You need all the dumb people around you to cover your back. Arrange for them to do it willingly and make them think it's their idea. That's smart.

      That you will take me seriously, I will momentarily and lift the veil on myself (anonymoously - please respect this), as one who got 1550 GRE's, holds multiple degrees in Physics (BA Magna Cum Laude), has made contributions in fusion and railgun research, taught at University, delivered pizza, rebuilt several engines, switched into programming, earns six figures doing light development work in the tropics, has been happily married since age 20, has raised 3 college educated children, is within 2 lbs of his ideal weight, has a wife who is within 2 lbs of her ideal weight (including the 34DD's), has travelled to 25 countries, speaks four languages, and would retire at the age of 50, except I'm having too much fun. My music CD of original compositions will be out later this year with myself on vocals, guitar, bass, keyboard and percussion. But my greatest feat has been to groom my wife and foster her career so that she make more money than me, (although she has but a HS diploma), and thus pities me and buys me expensive stuff.

      Still, I've met dozens of people more intelligent than I, some of them awesomely so, and I know there are many who have accomplished more than I. Even so, I would challenge you. If you're so damned smart, top this.

      Or maybe I'm making all of this up. Yep, probably.

      Was this the voice you had not yet heard?

      P.S. I have always avoided MENSA, nor have I ever stayed at a Holiday Inn Express. The truly smart have no need to prove it, nor do they need assistance in finding other smart people. You will know the tree by its fruit.

    4. Re:Mensa, eh by mzieg · · Score: 1
      Two words: "Anonymous" "Coward" :-(

      As great a person as you probably are, you're not likely to make many close friendships if that's your reflex. You've got to open up and take risks to form genuine relationships.

    5. Re:Mensa, eh by anagama · · Score: 1


      I checked to see if my SAT would qualify for membership -- after recalling my math and verbal scores, I fired up kcalc, punched in the numbers, and pressed [enter]. Yep - qualified. The irony? I scored higher in math! ;-)

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  26. Linux evangelization at Mensa in New Orleans by smartfart · · Score: 3, Informative
    I was contacted back in January by the committee that's putting on MensAGumbo here in July. Apparently RedHat declined their invitation to run a booth or give a presentation, but I readily accepted :-)

    I plan on using a variation of these bullet points for my presentation. If any of you slashdotters happen to be at MensAGumbo, please come and cheer me on, say hi, etc.

  27. Not to ruin things by smartsaga · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    But Mensa in fact means stupid or dumb in spanish...


    So NO, I don't buy it!!!


    Your Mensa are belong to us... get it? (not really but who cares)


    Have a good one.

    --
    ===== "Every head is a different world so don't invade mine you FREAK!" smartSAGA said
    1. Re:Not to ruin things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually you are wrong. Mensa means "table" in Spanish.

    2. Re:Not to ruin things by smartsaga · · Score: 1

      Wrong. What you are refering to is the four letter word "Mesa".

      Nice try though.

      --
      ===== "Every head is a different world so don't invade mine you FREAK!" smartSAGA said
    3. Re:Not to ruin things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the word "Mensa" in the local Mexican Spanish means something along the lines of idiot. It's a slang term.

      "Mesa" means table.

    4. Re:Not to ruin things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that's a bastardisation of the origins of the word. Mensa used to mean table, it still means table in Latin, and that is the derivation of the word for the Club name.

      In areas where Mensa has the slang association, they use Mesa instead. Everywhere else in the world, they use Mensa.

      Just because one small area has a slang variation, doesn't change the original meaning of the word. Besides, Spanish is notorious for localised differences in word meanings. In some areas, a perfectly acceptable word for woman means bitch, and vice versa.

      Such is life :)

  28. Common Sense by datafr0g · · Score: 0

    There's Mensas "Intelligence"
    There's Microsofts "Intelligence"
    Then there's plain good old fashioned Common Sense.

    I know which one I'd rather aspire towards.

    --
    "Who says nothing is impossible? Some people do it every day!" - Alfred E. Neuman
  29. Fuck 'em by themusicgod1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Throwing aside any accusations towards the organizations involved and looking purely at the people within them and the intentions of Mensa (if not the reality) there is a great irony. MSN User #121402: OMfG!11!!onehundredeleven! im so hpy - C U L8r GurlZ! The fact that the so called "Top 5% of the population" in terms of intelligence would want to be associated with that is delicious. The society that centres around the use of MSN consists mainly of 13 year olds who have just discovered that they can post blogs of their useless opinions and hopeless angst. Anyhow, can't say they don't deserve eachother. I suppose I can see how Mensa might want to advertise with MSN though. I mean, they've got to perpetuate their member-base somehow. "Angst-ridden kids" is actually a step up from "pompus, elitist old men with no practical skills (but a knack for IQ tests)".

    --
    GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
    1. Re:Fuck 'em by wootest · · Score: 1

      MSN is a portal. .NET Messenger is an IM network service, to which there are several clients, including the Microsoft-branded and official Windows Messenger and MSN Messenger, and others such as GAIM, Trillian, Miranda and Adium. http://www.msn.com/ - I couldn't even find "MSN Messenger" at first - turns out it's a small link in the MSN Services box. Way to completely mistake the wheel for the wagon.

  30. My problem with Mensa's standards... by ParadoxicalPostulate · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I have no personal experience with Mensa members. I remember being referred to the "practice exam" by a friend in high school, that's where I picked up some preliminary information on the group itself.

    That said, my main problem with Mensa is not their stated goal of creating an environment in which intelligent discourse can flourish.

    My problem is also not with the fact that, in order to accomplish such goals, they must exclude a certain (sizable) portion of the population from their "enlightened organization."

    The issue that I personally have with Mensa is that their standards are established not to accept people with some acceptable level of genius and potential, but rather to accept people who are "better than 99% of the rest of humanity."

    Thus, they are elitist in the purest sense of what I understand the term to mean. If their standards of admission were designed with the intent to merely keep the general body to a basic level of intelligence and competency, why index them against the average IQ of contemporary human beings? Bear in mind that, according to their admission testing, at no time can more than 2% of the population be members of Mensa (assuming universal application). The implicit assumption is that the vast majority of humanity is incapable of civil discourse and intelligent discussion (at least on the level that they would like), but I see no reason why this should be the case.

    I see the sub-par intellectuality of humankind as a practical failure, the burden of which is borne by the entire race. To me there appear no deep reasons to believe that the population must be divided into the two subgroups of which we are so fond: the brains and the brawn. It is true that some people will always be smarter, wiser, and more capable than others. However, I see such considerations to be largely irrelevant except when one considers the scholarly pursuits of the natural and social sciences. And in such a case, I would argue that chance and circumstance (by the latter I mean the state of society and associated research at the time of advancement) play a role so important that they may overshadow small differences in individual ingenuity.

    1. Re:My problem with Mensa's standards... by Feztaa · · Score: 2, Funny

      The implicit assumption is that the vast majority of humanity is incapable of civil discourse and intelligent discussion (at least on the level that they would like), but I see no reason why this should be the case.

      Obviously you've never worked in any sort of call center (tech support or otherwise).

      (kidding! ;)

    2. Re:My problem with Mensa's standards... by RWerp · · Score: 3, Funny

      The implicit assumption is that the vast majority of humanity is incapable of civil discourse and intelligent discussion (at least on the level that they would like), but I see no reason why this should be the case. And I see plenty. Including slashdot posts.

      --
      "Long run is a misleading guide to current affairs. In the long run we are all dead." (John Maynard Keynes)
    3. Re:My problem with Mensa's standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, then? Would you prefer it if they accepted the top 99% and only excluded the bottom 1%? Then they could have a sign saying "no retards!"

      Or maybe they should only accept the bottom one percent and exclude the top 99%? OMG, bwawhahahahaha I have a brilliant plan! And I will call it ASNEM! (Incidentoly, that is called an anal-gram. If you are not cognissant of that term then do not bothur to apply.)

    4. Re:My problem with Mensa's standards... by Monty+Worm · · Score: 1
      Bear in mind that, according to their admission testing, at no time can more than 2% of the population be members of Mensa (assuming universal application)

      This is a big assumption. Last time I ran the numbers, British Mensa had, of it's 2% of theoretically eligible members, a membership of about 2%. Of those members the vast majority never attend events (it's somewhere in the 2% range, on my rubbish evidence).

      2 percent of 2 percent is not a big number. The population of Great Britain is about 60 Million, I believe. You do the math.

      --
      ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    5. Re:My problem with Mensa's standards... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bear in mind that, according to their admission testing, at no time can more than 2% of the population be members of Mensa (assuming universal application).

      It doesn't work that way.

      To be a member of Mensa, you just have to get a high-enough score on an approved test at some point in your life.

      In theory, more than 2% of the population is eligible for membership, given that your "intelligence ranking" can change over your lifetime.

      I'm just guessing here, but I'll bet at least 5% of the population could score in the top 2% at some point in their lives.

  31. MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Get some b00bs like Asia Carrera.
    Asia Carrera has to be one of the most intriguing women of the adult movie industry. A member of the high-IQ organization MENSA, Asia ranks with the most intelligent and accomplished ladies to have ever appeared in X-rated films.
    from a Google search result
    1. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or does this fact comment on Mensa qualification standards? Let the viewer decide.

    2. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by orin · · Score: 1

      I think that the Asia Carrera boobies/IQ link is the whole deal behind the Major's assets in Ghost in the Shell. Why would a fricking cyborg (and even the digital world avatar of that cyborg) need the giant bazoombas? I've been thinking that perhaps she has some sort of extra memory (memory in her mammaries) there or something as they just don't make a whole lot of sense.

    3. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by cipher+uk · · Score: 1
      After reading her website i've come to the conclusion that she is the perfect woman.
      Hobbies and Interests - I haven't had much "free time" in years, and I pull all-nighters about twice a week just to stay on top of things, because my pornstar career and my buttkicking website are both fulltime jobs that I refuse to let anyone else handle for me. But whenever I can sneak some time to myself, I like honing my skills in Photoshop, upgrading and tweaking my computer hardware, and having friends over for 'Unreal Tournament' fragfests on my LAN.
      Emphasis mine ;).
    4. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And remember---if there's one piece of writing you can believe, it's the self-description on a porn star's website.

      Do you think she even wrote it? Or is someone just trying (quite successfully, apparently) for the /. niche market?

      I love busting people's dreams... :-)

    5. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1

      Her IQ score is actually far higher than the minimum required to get into Mensa.

      The fact is, people from all sorts of careers have joined Mensa. In that sense, its an anti-elitest organization.

      --
      No data, no cry
    6. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      gullible

      adj 1: naive and easily deceived or tricked; "People who believe porn star bio" [syn: fleeceable, green]

    7. Re:MSN is sponsering Mensa. Get in Mensa easily! by cipher+uk · · Score: 1

      which self respecting /.'ter would PAY for pornography. this porn star needs a better target audience.

  32. What're they worth? by hyperion454 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has MENSA even contributed anything to society? Ever? What's the last scientific breakthrough these fucking "geniuses" have had? I'm a college CSE student at __THE__ Ohio State Unviersity who's just had 17 Bud lights, yet I'm typing with perfect grammar. Let me in, MENSTtruation. I'm smarter than all those fuckers. Cocksuckers.

    1. Re:What're they worth? by hyperion454 · · Score: 1

      My bad. I misspelled University. Guess my grammar isn't perfect, after all.

    2. Re:What're they worth? by hyperion454 · · Score: 1

      And Lights should probably be capitalized.

    3. Re:What're they worth? by hyperion454 · · Score: 1

      MENSTRuation doesn't really make sense, does it? Fuck. Now I sound like an idiot. I'm really not, though. Promise.

    4. Re:What're they worth? by Reene · · Score: 1
      Let me in, MENSTtruation.
      Speaking from experience, I can say with great certainty that menstruation and the woes that come with it are far more bearable and indeed enjoyable than suffering a room full of MENSA members drifting about like so much spooge in a toilet bowl.
      --
      "He does look a bit Oompa like, even if his Loompa is a bit off-kilter."
    5. Re:What're they worth? by hyperion454 · · Score: 1

      I'm a good proofreader though.

    6. Re:What're they worth? by hyperion454 · · Score: 1

      Menstruation only has one "t." I told you I'm a good proofreader. Also, in my previous post I forgot a comma (,), and I sincerely apologize.

  33. MENSA or /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A stated goal of MENSA is creating an environment in which intelligent discourse can flourish.

    Slashdot?

  34. I am serious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just withdrew my membership from Mensa.

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. They make good bedfellows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mensa is the biggest group of Mental Masturbators ever.

    Seriously.

    Accept their offer (cmon, anyone can score in the top 2% on a REAL iq test not those corny ass web ones) and go to one of their meetings.

    It basically consists of "rah rah rah, we're smart and this is what smart people do". A few were genuinely interested in intelligence and brought some interesting puzzles--but for most of them its just mental masturbation to the extreme.

    Most people there had no practical ability IMO. They were your typical college students and adults who had high GPA (I have a 4.0 and it means nothing IMO) but had no ability to apply it or do something useful. They memorized facts. Ask them something that they hadn't read and they'd be totally blown away and couldn't answer. It'd be fun watching them squirm :)

    Real smart people don't join Mensa. People who want to be smart join Mensa.

    1. Re:They make good bedfellows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      anyone can score in the top 2% on a REAL iq test


      I tought 50% of people falls in the topmost 50%, and every scientific based IQ test uses a balanced scale where the average person falls in the center.


      They memorized facts.


      Are there memory tests in an IQ test?

    2. Re:They make good bedfellows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mensa is the biggest group of Mental Masturbators ever

      Slashdot != Mensa

    3. Re:They make good bedfellows... by isj · · Score: 1
      anyone can score in the top 2% on a REAL iq test

      You have obviously never tried a certified test, such as the "advanced progressive matrix" which relies on cognitive skills and not memorization.

    4. Re:They make good bedfellows... by Legion303 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "cmon, anyone can score in the top 2% on a REAL iq test"

      Except for the 98% who don't.

    5. Re:They make good bedfellows... by flibberdi · · Score: 1

      What one have to ask oneself is "Do I want to join a club that could (should?) have 130135502 (counted on pop of 6506775106) members??

      This is provided that the IQ test REALLY "weeds out" 98%... Which I find a little hard to belive. I now of NONE who hasn't scored over 130 (Stanford-Binet) on some of the "serious" IQ tests!! This could be that I socialize with "smart" people, but I don't think so... I think I socialize with people who has taken IQ-test since they were toddlers.. (which SHOULDN'T make a difference). If you are motivated and have done this tests before (talking about 20+ tests) you WILL qualify!! If that doesn't help, get some OMEGA-3, or if you really are into that, some performance enhancing drugs (search yahoo).

    6. Re:They make good bedfellows... by TheRealSync · · Score: 1

      "anyone can score in the top 2% on a REAL iq test"

      Wow... with those math-skills I'm sure you could easily qualify for a membership.

      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
  37. It's a perfect target for ms... by Albert+Sandberg · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. because everybody knows anybody with the IQ over a mouse should run linux ;) .Albert

    1. Re:It's a perfect target for ms... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      Surely you mean Mac OS X? :P

  38. I guess you can buy genius... by trisweb · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft's MSN is now sponsoring American Mensa events, featuring Mensa questions on the MSN homepage, and Mensa will put MSN's search on their new homepage in exchange for allowing Microsoft founder and CEO Bill Gates into their organization.

    When asked of this peculiar action, Mr. Gates told reporters: "I tried the tests and the puzzles and stuff, but I couldn't really figure them out. Then I realized that I was the richest man in the world and I didn't have to deal with this crap."

    Gates also spoke of creating a new organization tangential to Mensa, the Pecunia Society. "It has only one requirement -- just have more money than 99.998% of the world's population!"

    --
    "!"
    1. Re:I guess you can buy genius... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found these on the Interweb
      Their SAT scores
      Bill Gates: 1590

      Paul Allen: 1600

      my logical mind does not understand your funny sir.

  39. In defence of MS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a lot of comments along the lines of how ridiculous it is MS have anything to do with intelligence.

    But in their defence, MS do produce some of the best commercial software there is. It's all well and good comparing software written by other companies, but the fact is it's a lot easier for a small company with a single application to get better staff. Compared with other large companies - any company with more than 3 major products - MS software is actually quite stable and reliable. A lot of software from other companies is seriously buggy, horribly slow, and behaves totally unexpectedly.

    The other thing to consider is that they do have a policy of hiring intelligent staff based on more than academic qualifications. Their interviews are famous for questions like "How would you move mount fuji?"

    1. Re:In defence of MS by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Their interviews are famous for questions like "How would you move mount fuji?"
      With a spoon.

      Think of the benefits - great job security (the project that NEVER ends), exposure to lots of fresh air, lots of walking, no stressful lifting ...

    2. Re:In defence of MS by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      "How would you move mount fuji?"

      Trick question. Mt Fuji moves everyday at rouighly 700 mph due to the rotation of the Earth. If you throw in Earth's orbital velocity, then it's more like 25000 mph.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    3. Re:In defence of MS by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Good answer.

      Now, since this thread is about (among other things) Mensa-Bashing, here's another one:

      Interviewer: So tell me how you'd move Mount Fuji.
      Mensa member: Well, since Einstein proved that everything is relative to your frame of reference, the easiest way to move Mount Fuji would be to move myself.
      Interviewer: What does that accomplish?
      Mensa member: Don't you see? When I stop, in my frame of reference, Fuji has moved.
      Interviewer: To use your terms, in your frame of reference, you're hired.
      Mensa member: So I got the job?
      Interviewer: No, in OUR frame of reference, you still suck.
      Of course, the REAL answer (so far at least) is to give the interviewer a latte laced with Turbo-Lax. It won't be the mnountains' movements that he'll be giving a shit about.
    4. Re:In defence of MS by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Their interviews are famous for questions like "How would you move mount fuji?"

      That's easy.

      $ mv /mnt/fuji

    5. Re:In defence of MS by woah · · Score: 0

      bash$ mv /mnt/fuji
      mv: missing file argument
      Try `mv --help' for more information.

  40. Returning fire by Monty+Worm · · Score: 3, Informative
    If anything, this highlights the problems that Mensa has at the moment.

    Mensa's goals are (paraphrased): "To foster human intelligence, to research human intelligence, and provide a social forum for it's members" By and large, it's mainly only this last one that ever happens. By far and away the most popular regular Mensa meeting in London, England is the pub crawl.

    Mensa is a Social Club. Members often have very little in common, but a common ability to think. While there is a qualification of a top 2% IQ score for entry, only a tiny percentage actually apply.

    For the record, I'm not entirely comfortable with corporate sponsorship of Mensa. The fact that it's Microsoft is something I really don't like. But it's just my opinion - by policy, Mensa has no opinions

    (disclaimer: the author is a member of British Mensa, and sits on the London organising committee (LocSec forum)(

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
  41. Mensa Members by Kaenneth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Almost every Mensa member I've met is an arrogent bastard who thinks they are better than other people; having spent a few years at Microsoft, I know they'll fit right in.

    This isn't envy, when I took an IQ test I was literally off the scale. The highest standardised test score in the history of my school district was 176, I scored 212. I was disqualified from an 'intellectual' competition because I scored 98, when the second highest of over 100 others was 76, and I completed the quiz in 15 minutes of the alloted hour; they believed I must have cheated somehow.

    But I'm smart enough to know that the value of a person has nothing to do with standard test scores.

    While working at MS I treated the janitors with the same respect as my managers, because I knew that without eighter of them, the job wouldn't get done. One amusing moment was when the local grocery store clerk said she liked people like me, unlike those stuck up people who work at Microsoft, which was where I was working at the time.

    I may be able to craft an exceptional peice of software, recall what portion of a page in a novel a sentance appeared on, and instantly remember 10 digit numbers backwards; but I can't draw worth a damn, can't sing, or play a musical instrument, am a terrible speller, and can't parellel park.

    Everyone has different abilities, and just because someone is Rich, Smart, or Pretty; dosn't make them a good person.

    1. Re:Mensa Members by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 1

      This belongs in your resume not on Slashdot :)

      --


      My sig of choice is Marlboro
    2. Re:Mensa Members by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 1

      I have never seen a single person in my product unit be rude to the cleaning staff once... I'm not sure if you're implying that other people in your group were rude to them, and if that is the case I don't know what years you worked for MS. I do know what it's like today, though, and my PU treats the cleaning staff, receps, and cafeteria workers with a great deal of friendliness and respect.

      --
      No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
    3. Re:Mensa Members by jayloden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      amen! I totally agree - people who really are intelligent are smart enough to appreciate everyone for what they have to offer.

      -Jay

    4. Re:Mensa Members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a classic mensa spelling troll.

      1) MENSA
      2) Bad speling
      3) ???
      4) Profit!!

    5. Re:Mensa Members by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The highest standardised test score in the history of my school district was 176, I scored 212.

      No, that was the thermometer setting for the dish washer. Now get back to work!

    6. Re:Mensa Members by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

      If you were one of the cleaning people, I might be convinced, but your note only convinces me that you are treating them well. Many people talk down to people in lower positions. It is sometimes not noticed by outside observers. I would be surprised if less than half of your group didn't fit into that category.

    7. Re:Mensa Members by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      I may be able to craft an exceptional peice of software

      But you work for Microsoft, so there goes that idea.

    8. Re:Mensa Members by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Almost every Mensa member I've met is an arrogent bastard who thinks they are better than other people;

      We're not all that way, and if you were as smart as me you'd know that.

      P.S. It's a joke - laugh.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    9. Re:Mensa Members by Tony+Hammitt · · Score: 1

      I've met lots of people who consider Mensa a group for people who want to feel important. Not people who are in fact important.

      In fact, Mensa is a group for people who couldn't get into anything more exclusive. It has the least stringent requirements of any of the "high IQ" clubs. They will get along well with MSN.

    10. Re:Mensa Members by TheRealSync · · Score: 1

      I've met lots of people who consider Mensa a group for people who want to feel important.

      I've met lots of people who think people who post on slashdot just do so to feel important.

      The people you speak of - were they members of Mensa, or just people who held this opinion about a society they know little or nothing about?

      --
      -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
    11. Re:Mensa Members by Laser+Lou · · Score: 1

      Hey, its quite possible that some of the janitors you knew or that grocery store clerk could have been Mensa members. Many do not have office jobs, or make a lot of money.

      --
      No data, no cry
    12. Re:Mensa Members by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      I usually avoid mentioning those things about myself; as generally people think that I'm lying. My best friend went insane and believes that he has godlike powers, so while visiting him in the mental hospital I've met several of his co-residents who have self-proclaimed genius status.

      and I meant to clarify "Mensa Members I have met", is that sub-class of Mensa members that I have met, who intentionally made me aware that they are Mensa members.

    13. Re:Mensa Members by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Everyone has different abilities, and just because someone is Rich, Smart, or Pretty; dosn't make them a good person.

      But those are the most easily-promoted and understood "ideal" characteristics. I'm betting that the internet will eventually change peoples' perceptions drastically and for the better (this is the true genius of the internet).

      We all have in-built prejudices based on localized experiences, teaching and lore - with the net, you tend to understand someone (given enough content) before you actually meet them and this forms your perception without the disadvantage of superficial judgement.

      I.E., even if I had to have a steak tied around my neck to get my dog to lick my face as a child (Rodney Dangerfield quote?), if I provide you with a really useful program you don't give a crap what I look like.

  42. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by metlin · · Score: 1

    Hurt your puny little intellect now, did he?

    Cut him a little slack, the parent poster asked for it.

  43. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uh, in order to have mental orgies?

  44. Not very 'intelligent' to use MSN Search... by Domini · · Score: 1

    ... when you have Google?

    But then again, Mensa is just a place for people who cannot entertain themselves on their own... :P

  45. First look... by fyredragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    At first glance I thought I read:

    MSN Sponsors Menses

    And I'm thinking: gee, what a NOVEL way attract female readership!

    I'm gonna go visit my eye doctor tomorrow

    --
    --- fyredragon
  46. Obligatory The Weakest Link Quote by Matarick · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Anne: Jill, are you a member of any clubs?
    Jill: Yes (laughing).
    Anne: What's funny about that?
    Jill: I'm a former member of Mensa.
    Anne: Former member of Mensa.... did they throw you out?

    Got the quote from here.

  47. How amusing by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    A few weeks ago I saw an interview with a reporter who got into Mensa, she passed the test with flying colours... got into the group and went to a few meetings... well.. in short.. she didn't fill the test in at all. A friend did it for her..

    Seems they can't even tell when a "normal" person is among them, now they can't tell what a good source engine is. Next it'll turn out they were all frauds who had to make a gang incase someone wanted to take their pocket money..

    --
    I like muppets.
  48. Re:IQ Tests by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

    Testing proves that testing works.

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  49. Or maybe they do fail on intelligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    most of the people I've interviewed who have claimed Mensa membership on their resume are less than attractive as candidates. It's almost a badge of dishonour... They don't fail on intelligence (but that's not normally where people I interview fail anyway), they fail on people skills - being able to recognise that someone else may know more about X than you do, and coping with that knowledge well.
    That's because to do well on an IQ test you have to have very strong analytical skills. Now why does a person's brain develop strong analytical skills? For the same reason why a paralysed person will have very strong arms, or the blind man will have a very good ear.
    People overdevelop in a certain area to compensate for another area that doesn't work.
    IQ tests test analytical skills because the modern social paradyme views those areas as being the important areas of intelligence, whereas large portions of a person's intelligence are left completely untested by IQ tests.

    So what you get with an organization like Mensa are a pile of mild to moderate autistics who can do well on an IQ tests because much of their neurological development never happened, causing their brains to overdevelop in other areas to compensate for what they don't have. They may think they're smart, but overall they're often not any more intelligent than the average guy on the street, or perhaps less so. To be intelligent in one area means you're probably stunted in another, but to be intelligent in all areas is truly rare.
    1. Re:Or maybe they do fail on intelligence by mbrother · · Score: 1

      Only part right.

      There are plenty of really smart people out there. They're not the ones in Mensa. They're too smart to fall into a shallow, navel-contemplating self-congratulatory group like that.

      Marilyn vos Savant, "smartest person in the world," writes a fluff column. What an idiotic waste if she's so smart. What an idiotic waste for the whole lot of them. Why not work on puzzles that have some productive end?

      I tell my students that to become a scientist requires brain power, but it's only part of the equation, and while a necessary part, isn't the most important. The other two key parts are dedication and communication skills. You have to work hard, pay attention to details, over an extended period, and then be able to communicate the results to the world before it counts.

      No sour grapes here. I qualify for Mensa. They just don't qualify for me. I've got more important things to do.

      --
      Professor of Astronomy, Author of Spider Star & Star Dragon (Tor)
  50. I can see it now. by Spacejock · · Score: 1

    A new book on the way: Mensa for Dummies.

  51. Hah! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

    They deserve each other. An overrated web service and a bunch of pathetic mental masturbators. Good match.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  52. Canonical Mensa Test Questions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Why can't Mensa members get dates?
    2. If we tell people we're smarter than the people they're dating now, will they date us instead?
    3. Ok, the ones who will date us don't have any social skills either, but are we going to let that stop us from having a good time?
    1. Re:Canonical Mensa Test Questions by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Troll
      The Questions and their Replies:
      Q1. Why can't Mensa members get dates?
      1. Because, below a certain point, size does matter.
      2. Because deep down they know that anyone who would date them is just as boring as they are
      3. Because watching paint dry really is more interesting
      If we tell people we're smarter than the people they're dating now, will they date us instead?
      1. No, because if you're stupid enough to actually say that to someone, you don't deserve to breed in the first place
      2. No, because your mother STILL dresses you funny.
      3. How many times do you need to hear "I'd rather drink the grape kool-aid" before you get a clue?
      Ok, the ones who will date us don't have any social skills either, but are we going to let that stop us from having a good time?
      1. Yes, because premature ejaculation doesn't count a "having sex"
      2. Yes, because there are laws in most places against having sex with the dead, and beastiality
      3. Yes, because your MOMMA ain't going to let you out of the basement past 8 PM on a week-end, 6 PM on week-days.
      Now for some more Mensa questions and answers
      Q. Why did the Mensan cross the road?
      A. Who gives a shit?

      Q. What's the difference between a Mensan and a bucket of manure?
      A. Nothin' - they're both full of it.
      A2.The bucket.

      Q. What's the difference between talking to a Mensan and talking to a wall?
      A. You can walk away from a wall when you've won an argument.
      A2.Nothing - neither one understands "STFU or else!"
      A3.After the first 5 minutes - nothing. Either way, you'll be bored to death.

      Q. Santa Claus, The Easter Bunny, and The Tooth Fairy are at a bar with a group of self-confident Mensans. Who picks up the bar tab at the end of the night?
      A. Come on, you still believe in self-confident Mensans?
  53. ROTFL; mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROTFL; mod parent up.

  54. Not at all by jesterzog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So Mensa is an "old boy network"? The worse for it.

    Eh? I'm not a Mensa member, but I am a member of a social sports club and an amateur astronomical society. They're called extra-curricular activities, and they're a very good way to meet interesting people with common interests and attitudes.

    Both of my groups are full of people with whom I share common interests, and both are full of great contacts for other things in life if I ever want help. How is that different from Mensa, and how does that make any of these like an "old boy network"?

    Just as my and many other people's interests happen to be in a certain area shouldn't mean that someone else's interests shouldn't be allowed to be in the realm of puzzle solving and so on, and whatever else Mensan's engage in.

    1. Re:Not at all by bear_phillips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is a difference. An "old boy network" is basically a network that not everyone can get into. Thats why they use the term "boy", girls need not apply. Just look at the court cases saying that women have to be allowed membership to certain organizations. My local astronomy club allows anyone, no test required. Just like girls couldn't get into the "old boys network", low IQ people can't get into the "high iq network" that is Mensa. I personally don't think Mensa has much of a network. But anyone that is how their network is more like the "old boys network" than your astronomy club is.

      --
      http://www.windmeadow.com/
    2. Re:Not at all by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Your extra-curricular clubs, while they might attract people of above average intelligence, are based on common interests and activities, as you say.

      What is the "common interest" in Mensa? Being intelligent? I don't think that qualifies as an activity or a pursuit. (Granted, there are SIGs within Mensa that serve this purpose.)

      Mensa is more akin to an exclusive fraternity or sorority, the purpose of which is to filter out undesirables so that you can limit your interactions to people who are more similar to you than different. Is this a bad thing? To the extent that it leads to an "Old Boy Network" (defined elsewhere by another poster), yes. However, from what I know, there isn't a "Mensa Mafia", so we haven't seen any widespread abuses. It's probably no worse than an employer giving a slight preference to a candidate that graduated from the same university, if that.

      For me personally, while I understand the urge to filter out the less intelligent from my life, I don't think it's really intelligent to do so, nor realistic, nor practical. Even if it were possible, why would I want to limit myself? Further, I don't think Mensa's methodology is up to the task. As stated elsewhere, the requirement isn't intelligence, but how well you do on tests that purport to measure intelligence.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re:Not at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is one you identify yourself: while your sports club and astronomical society were founded for the purpose of, you know, playing sports and gazing at stars and junk, the purpose of Mensa is just to collect a bunch of people who scored highly on a few tests; that's it. Whether they do anything else at all is completely irrelevant to the organization's goals, which makes it look like a pretty poor way to spend your time.

  55. Mensa will put MSN's search on their new homepage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i thought mensa was full of smart people....

  56. Has to be said... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "I don't want to belong to any club that will accept me as a member."

    --Groucho Marx

  57. Now I have a reason not to go Menza by Zo0ok · · Score: 0

    Great! I have thought about doing the Menza test. I mean - of course it would feel great to belong to the smartest 2% of the population! On the other hand I could fail... But as a seeker of knowledge and truth - is it acceptable not to take a test because the result can be a disappointment? Thats quite cowardly!

    And are those people in Menza smart at all? Does the damn test really measure anything meaningful? Will I find nice friends there, or will I just be even more the geek and the nerd I already am?

    So this was great news for me! I dont like MS, I dont like MSN. Frankly, MS is for Amateurs! Thus, now Menza is for Amateurs and wannabies as well! Good news, made my day!

    Thanx and have a nice day!

    1. Re:Now I have a reason not to go Menza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad to hear you will not be joining us at Menza, a social club for the dyslexic intellect, have you thought about Mensa?

  58. (Anti-interlectual society, etc.) by DJCF · · Score: 1

    By far and away the most popular regular Mensa meeting in London, England is the pub crawl.

    Yes, but then again England isn't exactly the best place to do anything else, is it?

    1. Re:(Anti-interlectual society, etc.) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!

      What could one possibly do in a country like England. It is not like it has some beautiful vistas to see, 1000's of years of history to look into, any major sporting occasions to watch, any interesting places to visit, amazing architecture to see or theme parks to have fun at.. There is no place to go shopping, climbing, rambling, ice skating, skiing, drink coffee or driving. There are no libraries, universities, book shops or even schools. Hell it hasn't even been the home to some of the worlds great thinkers, writers, scientists or leaders. They don't even have running hot water or indoor toilets.

      All their is to do in England is go to pubs. The 1000's upon 1000's of American, Japanese and other nationalities who visit England as tourists every year come for the real beer. They also like to partake in the Whisky that is smuggled across the Scottish border, inside milk cows, by the Newcastle Mafia.

      It is just like American where all there is to do is go out and get mugged.

    2. Re:(Anti-interlectual society, etc.) by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      It is just like American where all there is to do is go out and get mugged.
      Unless you're the one doing the mugging.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  59. To all you whiners out there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you just dont cut it. Cope with it.

    Go quote wikipedia, or grep "my theachers panties" or whatever... Groucho Marx's statement doesen't apply here. You are not invited.

    ys

    PaleMensaDude

  60. MIcrosoft:Mensa :: Google:PhD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My initial reaction to Mensa+Microsoft was more along the lines of, "is this Microsoft's answer to the fact that Google is renowned for hiring a lot of PhDs?"

  61. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Frankly, I'm not the "worrier" type who needs the justification of a test to prove (s)he's as good as (s)he thinks (s)he is.
    [...]
    Uh huh...
    I've excelled in every academic test I've ever taken. (14 'O' levels, 6 'A' levels, 2 'S' levels, a Physics degree from IC, London, and a PhD at KCL). I have more qualifications (in spades) than 99% of people I've met.
    [...]
    Please, go on.
  62. Mensa means a whole different thing in Spanish... by joetheappleguy · · Score: 1

    You'd figure they would have done some basic research before settling on a organization's name...

    What a bunch of mensos.

  63. Apparently by melted · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    >> eighter of them

    Apparently you aren't smart enough to learn good spelling. Which kinda puts you in the "arrogant bastard" category.

    1. Re:Apparently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparently you are to lazzy to look up disablities like dislexia dysgraphia discalculia ect.

      and that my good melted puts you in the "ignorant bastard" category

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dysgraphia
      in french dutch ect it's something that can be farely well worked around becauze they have regular gramar spelling ect in english it's hell becauze it's 2 languishes mixed, bloated ect

    2. Re:Apparently by Rick+and+Roll · · Score: 1

      Or better yet, an insensitive clod.

  64. Mensa? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That's "the low self-esteem society' isn't it?

    --
    That was classic intercourse!
    1. Re:Mensa? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Best 1 sentence description of Mensa I read in this story's comments so far.

    2. Re:Mensa? by lasfinest · · Score: 1

      Nice to see nobody knows what they are talking about here. What a bunch of "Densans"!

  65. fuck you by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    you owe me a new keyboard!! I just spit tequila all over this one.

  66. oh come on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shit, how hard can it be to get into MSN? There must be security holes everywhere.

  67. This pretty much sums it up by nih · · Score: 1

    In reference to the ELO rating system chess grandmaster David Bronstein once said you can't put a number on a brain

    --
    I'm a rabbit startled by the headlights of life :(
  68. Mensa's suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't get social skills by socializing with your own nerdy kinds.

    Social skills deal with EQ more than IQ. my IQ 144 on a scale of 150 (Netherlands), but the only friends I had in college were real nerds I couldn't relate to. Their narrow interests (technical, nothing social, political or whatever), their lack of motivation. I tried starting a business with them. They are completely useless. They prefer to sit home and watch reruns of Star Trek, or giggle over nerdy ideas of how the world could be, with nifty little gadgets.

    Nerdclubs are not beneficial to people making sense of the world and participating in it effectively. I can see where they need the be mentally challenged by others on their own level to further their own knowledge, however, it is terribly one sided, as they also need to be challenged in their social skills and learn to relate to others who are not like them.. so they can understand social and political concerns and serve mankind optimally. Being smart is not an achievement. It's merely a potential, and means.

    To generalize, any 'grouping' is harmful to social health, be it based on IQ, race, religion, wealth or whatever. Interaction among them is far more valuable. Because it helps become more concouss of the world we live in. And that I believe is a prerequisite to know right from wrong and be a good rather than bad influence to society.

    Scientists who live in their own reality, and get drifted off in their own obsession in their own narrow field of interest, without understanding how it relates and affects the larger context of life and morality, deserves serious concern.

    1. Re:Mensa's suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their narrow interests (technical, nothing social, political or whatever), their lack of motivation. I tried starting a business with them. They are completely useless. They prefer to sit home and watch reruns of Star Trek, or giggle over nerdy ideas of how the world could be, with nifty little gadgets.

      Well, gee. That blows my socio-philosophical comments about American society. I guess Mensans really are the same everywhere. But the important point is that we are discussing a population.

      Through the magic of anonymous posting, I'll state that I am a 25 year Mensan and met my wife there, so I can make some insider observations.

      First, it's a social group like any social group. You collect the subgroup you hang out with and with an adequate population that works out fine.

      Second, they at least laugh at most of your jokes. There's "something" about Mensan self-selection that is uniquely different from belonging to Drunken Bambi Blasters Unlimited or Evangelicals for Stoning Gays. They are a pleasantly clever group to hang out with occasionally.

      Unfortunately, there is still a heavy GIGO factor. Mensans may be better read than most people, but (A) most people don't read and (B) the people who read have made the "Swept Away" books the top 10 best sellers in the U.S. The bar is very, very low so don't expect to hold deep semiotic deconstructions of the 6 o'clock news with Mensans at social events. As a group, they are likely to be as culturally naive as the next person and simply clever in their ignorance. And they probably watch American Idol. They just read Discover too.

      The relationship is clear. Mensans, as a GROUP, ain't got no more class than the average Joe. The average Joe who uses MSN ain't got no class. Therefore, Mensa and MSN are a match made in heaven.

      [On the perception that Mensans are all losers, there is a "Millionaire Mensans" subgroup that answers the question, "If you're so smart, why aren't you rich?" And I've met many Mensan professionals and discussed such important issues as "Porsche, buy new or used?", "Hang on to the first property and rent it out when moving up or not?", and "I retired at 50 but it was boring, so why not work a little?" The occasional Mensan is even beautiful so you can really hate them. (although it's possible to overdo the sour grapes.)]

  69. One big problem with being intelligent: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you have the body of a fighter which tells you to kill and break things, and your brain is saying "Wait a minute, buddy."

  70. It's called innovation! by wolftone · · Score: 1

    this is just another example of microsoft innovating! it's a new way to bring smart people together, and to foster a richer environment for msn users.

    it doesn't matter that google did something like it first, what matters is that microsoft is innovating!

  71. hehehe by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I look at Mensa as I look at the "gifted" kids when I was in school.

    Not very smart but able to memorize a chapter of a math text before a test. Ask them to use the information practically or to extrapolate from it...

    I was in the gifted stream for half a semester in grade 8 [way back in the day]. We had todo indy projcts. I wrote a BBS in pascal. The average other student did a collage on something they read about....Basically little kiddy projects.

    I've met a Mensa dude before [friend of family actually] and while he's a nice dude and all I don't particularly look at him as an above average intelligence person...

    So go ahead MSFT, sponsor Mensa. Instead of actually ***doing*** crafty things you can sponsor people who just think highly of themselves...

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    1. Re:hehehe by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those were basically my thoughts.

      "I hope they eat Mensans and die."

      Given that being a member does not imply proven working skills and disciplines.

      Though I am considering joining (the geeks, not the megacorp).

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:hehehe by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Bingo. I think of Mensans as I think of the average "school work sucks" type.

      People not using their potential is just annoying.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:hehehe by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I have to point out though, school work is typically unproductive. It'd be nice if that changed somehow.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  72. Douglas Coupland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I forget which book it was, but he satirised Mensan's as a bunch of balding sendentary sex-obsessed Men and middle aged women who laugh at their own spoonerisms.

  73. Re:Mensa means a whole different thing in Spanish. by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'll make a language where all the really common words of other languages are horrible horribly bad evil vile words.

    "Dude, you can't say 'the', that means @#$%^&* in Zivlang!"

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  74. Curious... by psymastr · · Score: 0

    You have to be pretty dumb to use MSN for your web searching.

    --
    Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
  75. Mensa and Myths about Nerds by gvc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Contrary to conventional wisdom, intelligent people are more, not less, likely to be socially competent, well groomed, aware of what's going on in the world, etc.

    That said, Mensa is a social club with highly self-selected membership. I'm not sure that its members are any weirder than members of Parents without Partners, a Sci-Fi Con, or an athletic club.

    There's nothing wrong with a social club that draws together people with a common interest. It is just that in Mensa the common interest is one's own intelligence, with a tacit subtext of "only people who know how smart I am appreciate me, and I appreciate only people who are as smart as me."

    I have never been a Mensa member; I have never been tempted to be a Mensa member for the reasons cited. I know some, but remarkably few, Mensa members. They haven't convinced me that Mensa members have enough genuine common interests to form a cohesive social club.

  76. Not likely users by mjjohansen · · Score: 1

    Every person I know gifted with high technical and mathematical intelligence is a Linux user. I'm a Mensa member and a Debianite and consider MS' principle of making almost all decisions for the user an insult to anyone's intelligence.

  77. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Although I'm not member of the Mensa (but certainly would qualify), and don't plan to get in any time soon for most of the reasons given by others in this thread, I think this organisation doesn't deserve the contempt expressed by many here.

    Being gifted is a terrible weight to carry for a child, because it shows and constantly expose you to jealous behaviours and sarcasms from other kids, their parents, not to speak of teachers. You spend years in schools trying to offer the smallest surface of yourself to the view of others - unsucessfuly, in general.

    You think that it'll get better in college ? Nope, wrong. In adulthood ? Nope. Wherever you go, you are surrounded by the same poisoned atmosphere when people realise you think faster than they do. When you're that bright, yu soon understand what it was to be suspect of wichcraft.

    Look at this thread : full of hatred against those folks, because they dare claim they're smart. Would they have claimed any other talent such as music or painting, there would be applauses of joy, but logical intelligence must be hidden.

    So I understand those people like to gather, just to meet some of their kind. And I think there's a form of therapy in it. Bragging about it being part of the therapy, just like the AAs.

    Being gifted is a curse most of the time.

  78. It's all just flogging the organ! by Flounder · · Score: 1
    Mensa - Intellectual Masterbation
    Posting on Slashdot - Intellectual Masterbation

    We're all just wankers, we just do it in different booths.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  79. so what you're saying is by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    people in mensa are retarded AND feminine.

  80. Idiots by rhaikh · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Man, you'd have to be an idiot to use MSN search.

  81. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by wootest · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I guess some people just can't win or even draw with some other people. The guy's explaining that he doesn't give a shit about what he listed for clarity - if he hadn't listed it, someone else would have questioned him and called him a fraud instead. He didn't go on and on about it in several sentences, he put it aside in a parenthesis *because it wasn't the point* and because he had a real point to make.

    Stop being so goddamned cynical, nit-picking and condemning and try to nail people for the smallest thing. I'm ashamed that people reckon this is Insightful.

  82. Smart enough by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    You would think they would be smart enough to put Google search on the homepage?

  83. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ? Why is this moderated over-rated , Over-rated is for things that are Moded up already .
    Mod parent up-
    Its a joke

  84. Your perception of Mensa is coloured. by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a Mensa member, I'd have to say you're wrong about most members.

    Most Mensa members are quite ordinary people who happen to be able to perform logical thought faster and more accurately than average. While there are some arseholes, just as there are in any group, most recognise their ability for what it is. Most also recognise that IQ isn't what makes you a good person, or a particularly valuable member of society.

    It might interest you to know that those who score the top 2% out of the population can gain entry to Mensa should they wish to. Know also that Mensa in the UK has only around 40,000 members out of a potential membership of 1,200,000 people. The US stats will probably be similar. That means that there are a *LOT* of equally smart people out there who frankly can't be arsed, haven't bothered or don't think they are smart enough to join.

    In conclusion, your perception of Mensa isn't the reality of the organisation or most of the people in it. As I said, most of the people are quite ordinary, from all classes, political persuasions, cultures, races. They get together occasionally for a beer or coffee and a chat.

    Finally, if you think you can practice for the test and ace it, on you go. You could then throw the result in their face when you pass and tell them their society isn't worth joining. More power to you.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  85. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Misanthropy · · Score: 1

    "Look at this thread : full of hatred against those folks, because they dare claim they're smart. "

    The key word here is "claim". Why would they feel the need to announce their intelligence to the rest of the world? Usually to make up for some perceived inferiority in their lives.

    It's interesting that often the TRULY brilliant people never really admit/realize how smart they are. Or they realize that there is always somebody smarter than them.
    I've been reading a memoir by Richard Feynman, who by most people's measure was a genius. Yet he continually says things that show that he isn't terribly impressed with himself. I guess meeting people like Niels Bohr and Einstein would do that to you (but those guys probably thought they weren't the super geniuses they were, either).
    But however these guys thought of themselves they DID something with their genius, not sit around and think about how smart they are.
    Would anybody remember them if they hadn't? You never hear people saying stuff like, "yeah he never got much done, but that guy was freaking smart!"

    I guess my point is that nobody cares how smart you are. It's what you do with it.
    You don't need to be a super genius or even that far above average to accomplish something.

    As for what have I accomplished? Well for today...you're looking at it. However smart I may be, it will never make up for the fact that I am lazy.

  86. Do you expect a dog to meow? by lkturner · · Score: 1

    Of course not. Then why expect perfection from Mensa? Straight from their web page, "Membership in Mensa is open to persons who have attained a score within the upper two percent of the general population on an approved intelligence test that has been properly administered and supervised. There is no other qualification or disqualification for membership eligibility."

    There's nothing in there about being good with people, trivia, cooking, art, blah blah.. They know exactly what they are and don't pretend to be more. Why get upset with them because your perception of their charter is incorrect? Look at Slashdot. "News for Nerds. Stuff that matters." The top headline is "Firefox Continues to Bite into IE Usage." How much of the world population think "Firefox Continues to Bite into IE Usage" matters?

    I'm sure there arrogant members within Mensa, just like any other group of people (just look at Slashdot, or the IT field). Do you think the arrogant members became arrogant when they joined Mensa? Of course not. They know they were "God's gift to the (insert any field/group/etc here)" from the very beginning.

  87. They're going to sponsor my lunch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Here in Germany, the Mensa is the place at a university where you can get cheap food. I've never heard of this l33t-club here, I think the idea is just wierd.

  88. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny
    Here's a good anecdote to illustrate the difference between Mensans and true genius:
    Some of Einstein's collegues asked him why he spent time helping an 8-year-old girl with her math.
    His answer was "I help her with her math, and she gives me jellybeans."
    I don't think Mensans are smart enough to get it.
  89. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Being gifted is a terrible weight to carry for a child, because it shows and constantly expose you to jealous behaviors and sarcasms from other kids, their parents, not to speak of teachers. You spend years in schools trying to offer the smallest surface of yourself to the view of others - unsuccessfully, in general.

    Being gifted is not a curse - failing to develop socially is. I know plenty of really smart people who were popular - mainly because being smart did not define them. They played sports, were into music, one did pyrotechnics effects for plays - all things that *were* of interest to others. They're all nice, well rounded people who happen to be smart - and are fun to be around because discussions center on things besides IQ and tests.

    Yea, nobody wanted to be around the kid that bragged about a 100 on a test - and the really smart ones figured it out and developed other interests as well.

    You think that it'll get better in college ? Nope, wrong. In adulthood ? Nope. Wherever you go, you are surrounded by the same poisoned atmosphere when people realize you think faster than they do. When you're that bright, you soon understand what it was to be suspect of witchcraft.

    I don't know about your experiences, but my college experiences didn't involve poisoned atmospheres for bright people. My roommate, for example, was brilliant - nearly a 4.0 in Mech Eng / Nuke Eng, aced tests by simply reading 100 pages of a textbook the night before an exam, yet he was very well liked and respected member of my fraternity. Why? Because his intelligence did not define him. He had great social skills, and if you needed help in a course he'd take the time to explain things until you understood them.

    Look at this thread : full of hatred against those folks, because they dare claim they're smart. Would they have claimed any other talent such as music or painting, there would be applauses of joy, but logical intelligence must be hidden.

    No, the "hatred" is toward folks who seem to think intelligence is somehow valuable or makes someone better than another. IQ isn't a skill, nor is it particularly valuable - what is worth recognition is what you do with it.

    We've all met bright people that exude the impression that because you're "not as bright" or didn't get as high a test score that you're not in their league. Any wonder people treat them like they're an ass?

    You could replace Mensa with "people who think that living in a high rent zip code form closed social club" and you'd get many of the same responses. And you know what - many of the people who would meet that criteria are nice people who are well liked, and a few are pompous asses who think they're disliked because of where they live; never realizing that they would be pompous assess and treated as such no matter where they are.

    Being gifted is a curse most of the time.

    No, the curse is thinking being gifted is something you think others really care about.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  90. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Metasquares · · Score: 1
    Smarter people set harder challenges for themselves than the rest of the population, then get disappointed when they fall short of those challenges. No matter how intelligent, I wonder if anyone is satisfied with his intelligence.

    I agree that you don't need to be intelligent to accomplish something. You just need to be very determined or lucky.

  91. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 2, Insightful
    You think that it'll get better in college ? Nope, wrong. In adulthood ? Nope. Wherever you go, you are surrounded by the same poisoned atmosphere when people realise you think faster than they do. When you're that bright, yu soon understand what it was to be suspect of wichcraft.

    Look at this thread : full of hatred against those folks, because they dare claim they're smart. Would they have claimed any other talent such as music or painting, there would be applauses of joy, but logical intelligence must be hidden.


    It's not that it must be hidden, it's that you must not flaunt it at the expense of others. Insulting the intelligence of others even in a catharic manner is unacceptable. Half of life is getting along with other people. With making sure others feel as though they are part of the process.

    I absolutely agree that bright children have it hard. Does it suck that people of "average intelligence" engage in this behavior? Yes. Does it give a person based on thier intellect the right to return the favor? No. To put it in the terms of my grandmother (who only had an 8th grade education); Smart kids tend to have a lot of "book sense", but no "common sense". And trust me, growing up she tossed that one at me enough that it eventually stuck.

    I don't think there's many people that use this forum that haven't been ostracized due to thier percieved intellect. And a fair number I can assure you, don't have that all important "common sense". In order to succeed socially, you have to be people savvy to an extent; and maintain an attitude of juggling the egos of others, not adding to or inflaming thier insecurities.

    It's one thing to proclaim how bright you are, and to execute/apply that intellect at the expense of others. It is another simply to note that you are a person that knows a fair amount, but can always learn something else. Something new.

    As for me, I've seen a lot of credentials tossed about in this conversation. I have some. Not that they mean much. I noted that long ago. It's not an accurate indicator of intellect.

    I've also been the kid ostracized for being bright. Add on to that culturally ostracized for showing interest in things my peers considered 'white' (although I don't agree with his outlook on it, read John McWhorter's "Losing The Race: Self Sabotage In Black America" for more on that). I even remember thinking that indeed, I am brighter than most. But most of all, I remember my grandmother telling me that I may be bright, but I still don't know shit.
    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
  92. Re:Mensa means a whole different thing in Spanish. by ggvaidya · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International#T rivia

    In a nutshell: they knew, but figured that mensa was more similar to the Spanish mesa (table) than menso (m) or mensa (f) meaning stupid.

  93. freemasonry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People will never forgive you belonging to circle they can't.

    have you ever heard of the freemasonry?

  94. MENSA: A badge of Dishoner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone stupid enough to pay a fee to join MENSA deserves to be ridiculed. Please keep putting MENSA on your resume. It saves us the trouble of calling you in for an interview.

    1. Re:MENSA: A badge of Dishoner by jcuervo · · Score: 1

      I take it your application was rejected for spelling "dishonor" incorrectly.

      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  95. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Metasquares · · Score: 1

    I would argue that it does get a bit better in college and adulthood, especially if you manage to find like-minded people, which would explain the purpose of Mensa. After all, one of the easily recognizable purposes of lower education is to build a social network, whereas it is assumed that you are capable of forming your own connections without help by college. However, I do see your point: Among their nongifted peers, the gifted are eschewed and ridiculed. At best, they're barely tolerated. The only roles which they seem to be accepted in are those that demand intelligence: Those such as professor and tutor. Even then, you're always approached as a pedagogue, never a peer.

  96. Who makes the job offer? by bayerwerke · · Score: 1

    I think those that offer jobs based upon the possesion of an MCSE certification are typically members of MENSA.

  97. What's wrong with mental masturbation? by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

    Mental masturbators can do it anytime, anywhere in public or private, without anybody else's knowledge and without making a mess. What's wrong with that?

    --
    ---------
    There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  98. At least they got one thing right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Response Headers - http://www.us.mensa.org/local_groups/overview.php3

    Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:34:26 GMT
    Server: Apache
    X-Powered-By: PHP/4.3.9
    Keep-Alive: timeout=15, max=97
    Connection: Keep-Alive
    Transfer-Encoding: chunked
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

  99. their taste in games is okay by tofucubes · · Score: 1

    maybe this is just me not looking too deeply into the affairs of mensa but the only thing I find mensa really good for is for finding fun games and puzzles...like set and apples to apples... i really don't know anything else practical that they've done with thier intelligence but this seems like a pretty good idea. anyway this is just from like a boring average person

    --
    Some people believe 1-1=3 and for the sake of being politically correct, we should respect their differences
    1. Re:their taste in games is okay by anagama · · Score: 1
      Well, the MENSA hangman game is pretty lame. The dictionary is pretty small:

      • study language goal victory studious pressure intense exciting triumph effort america assured dreams achieve phonetic striving decisive feat mnemonic

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  100. A match made in pergatory by BlindRobin · · Score: 1

    Both organizations exhibit many of the same characteristics.
    They are just two of many anachronistic collections of persons with agenda defined by narrowly defined parameters chosen to enhance their own self engrandisement and the general perception in others that they are in some mannner superior to them.


  101. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by perkr · · Score: 1

    I completely agree, time to meta mod again.

  102. I think you should try it then! by hap_ei · · Score: 1

    "it is not all that hard to ace the Mensa test if you prepare well enough for it - just spend a while solving puzzles and patterns, and it'll be a cakewalk." I have heard that a million times, and challenged as many. None have so far succeded! Go ahead!

  103. Corruption Reigns Supreme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. what if Mensa were full of smart bunnies?

    Whether they are intelligent or not does not change one simple fact, the adoption of MSN links proves that they are corrupt.

    Not all intelligent people are corrupt.

    But corrupt people may be intelligent.

    (If you are following this logic you may still apply to be admitted to Mensa).

    All I'm saying is that anyone who knows any history of computing knows Microsoft is a dominant monopoly that abuses its power by manipulating all efforts for common standards and ethical behavior.

    Any significant system (such as a church, a political party, an intelligence club) is subject to corrupt behavior. Evidently Mensa has evolved to a stage where the great majority of the organisation is selfish and corrupt enough to have little in the way of moral values.

    *sigh*

    So stop debating if Mensa is intelligent or not. Address the real issue.. is Mensa corrupt or not?

  104. Mensa not the true community of the intelligentsia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mensa is a club that lets its members pretend that they're somehow special. The *real* community of the intelligentisa is academia.

  105. I'm happy for you Simon! by hap_ei · · Score: 1

    Does your succes ... and no-membership of Mensa make every Mensa member an "arrogant SOB"? Does it make NAY Mensa member an "arrogant SOB"? Or is it just you?

  106. wtf? by jcuervo · · Score: 1

    The entire first screenful of comments is people trying to be intellectual in the face of Mensa, and doing the whole it's-its, your-you're thing.

    --
    Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
  107. Were they americans? by hap_ei · · Score: 1

    "Almost every Mensa member I've met is an arrogent bastard who thinks they are better than other people." That's probably because the only people you have ever met are americans!

  108. Its not a Mensa-thing! Its american! by hap_ei · · Score: 1

    I am a member of Mensa in Europe - which is an organisation made out of ordinary people with a high IQ - and I am very displeased with what the american organisation has done! But what the heck! What else can you expect from americans! This is not a Mensa-thing. This is just another exampe of american behaviour!

    1. Re:Its not a Mensa-thing! Its american! by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      As I said above, I'm not American. I'm Canadian. If you Europeans are giving decent tests and aren't arrogant, then I have no quarrel with you.

      You should focus on your people skills. Turning this into an "America vs. Europe" discussion doesn't encourage friendship. How many Americans want to befriend somebody that says, "That's not how we do it in Europe!"? :^) It gets even worse when the person that you seem to disagree with isn't even American, because you are being presumptuous. And it can get even worse than that.

  109. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Frankly, I'm not the "worrier" type who needs the justification of a test to prove (s)he's as good as (s)he thinks (s)he is. I've done it and I'm proud of what I've done.

    I'm a clever guy


    ... but not clever enough to figure out your own gender?

  110. Re:Mensa not the true community of the intelligent by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 1

    There's more than a grain of truth to that. Even business and industry leaders cling to the academic community.

    Most academics have enough sense to know that there are things more important than intelligence.

  111. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being gifted is a curse most of the time.

    Oh keyyyrist. Being gifted isn't a curse, being a socially inept boob is a curse. Many people on this thread brought up Richard Feynman -- do you think he found his genius to be a curse? No, as he didn't do what a majority of geeks do and that is flaunt their intelligence why making snarky comments that no one will accept them.

    While you might think its perfectly acceptable to flaunt your IQ, what do you think of someone that constantly flaunts their money? Walks around with bling bling while driving his Benz? Do you admire him or pity him for trying to buy acceptance? Why are the rules changed when it comes to IQ?

    Its like the old football quote of "acting like you've been there before" when scoring a touchdown. Those with true intelligence don't need to publically flaunt it, they are secure in themselves with their own powers.

  112. MENSA is an acronym for ... by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Funny

    My
    Ego
    Needs
    Some
    Attention

  113. Um... by neypo · · Score: 0

    Isn't Mensa supposed to be smart?

  114. hear hear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hear hear; wonder how many people understood your comment?

    GrimRC

  115. Don't put Mensa on your Resume by ca1v1n · · Score: 1

    If you have ever made the mistake of signing up for Mensa (I almost did, for the sake of getting brain-teasers in the mail), don't put it on your resume unless you're certain it will only be read by people who are members of Mensa.

    I don't have hiring authority, but my boss does have me screen potential hires at job fairs and do interviews. I've seen a couple of resumes that mention Mensa. They are, without exception, from people who would fall into the 3rd quartile of the people at my company in terms of innate technical talent, but they strike me as the sort who would be mostly untrainable, dropping them into the 2nd quartile after our rather intense training process, and then due to unwillingness to pick up the skills we want them to have if they conflict with their own curiosities, down into the first quartile after six months on the job, because the people hired with them are now much more valuable to us.

    That's not to say that I reject any resume that mentions Mensa, just that I have yet to put one in our fairly short call-back pile. I could definitely see a manager starting to form that association after a while.

  116. questionable comments by DrWho42 · · Score: 1

    My opinion of Slashdot posters just plummeted. Seriously, a few years ago there were so many insightful comments regularly posted. After reading this article it seems like most people here are jealous script kiddies. A truly intelligent individual wouldn't resent others for being intelligent also. Only those lacking confidence in their own abilities would lash out so viciously.

  117. In other news... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

    >> MSN Sponsors Mensa

    And in other news, Mensa is changing its name to MeSNa.

  118. How many MENSA members.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... are stupid enough to buy into the "microsoft way?"

    i figure most of them are card-carrying members of the open source community if they're involved with computers at all... if they aren't, they're probably smart enough to realize that giving microsoft MORE money (by using windows, microsoft web properties, etc..) to further their monopolistic ways is BAD, and use competing or open source products anyway...

  119. Mensa - Elitist club of underacheivers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Many mensans are losers.

    The truly intelligent are out there utilizing their intelligence rather than sitting around building up a false sense of ego.

    Now let me ask this .. it would be more useful if mensa members were out there working in soup kitchens or building homes for people who need them.

    If they are so damn intelligent .. why not sit around and come up with and IMPLEMENT real world, workable solutions, for poor people??
    Oh wait, I'm sorry that requires being attached to the real world.

    I suspect many of them (i'm being nice so I'll say probably not all) are only interested in getting credit and recognition for being "intelligent".

    After all, when one hasn't actually accomplished anything useful there must be some way to compensate.

    Also, if mensans were smart they would recognize the value in allowing "ordinary folk" into their organization. Especially if a member of ordinary folk is interested in what they do. There is always something to learn from everybody. Anyone who doesnt recognize that can't possibly be smart. Is mensa concerned that a "dummmy" will dumb down their own intelligence? They don't need to reduce the level of puzzles or whatever the hell mensans sit around doing. They can maintain solving the types of puzzles they currently work on (just make it clear to everyone joining that the puzzles are difficult and the topics spoken about are complex). Those who don't like it will leave.

    So, I challenge the mensa societies of the world to do something useful rather than inflate their own egos.

  120. I have a few friends in Mensa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I love them, but believe you me, those people don't know how to get out of the rain.

  121. Anti-intellectualism by node+3 · · Score: 1

    The anti-intellectualism shown here is disturbing. There are people here who've had bad encounters with Mensans, and go on to claim that "Having a high IQ doesn't make you a good person!" Well, Mensa agrees with you! They aren't the "good person club", they are the high (well, top 2%) IQ club. I also wonder how many people who mod up the anti-Mensa posts have actually knowingly met a representative sample of Mensans?

    And all this talk that "IQ is useless" is bullocks. IQ is (an attempt to measure) a resource (just one of many), and if a person is emotionally capable of exploiting that resource for their betterment, then their IQ has helped.

    To attempt a (somewhat) lame analogy, IQ is like voltage--it's potential. Your personality is like the electronic circuitry, and the current is whether or not you apply your IQ. If your voltage is too low to power the electronics, you can use effort and hard work to make up for it (just as you can use circuitry to increase the voltage beyond that of the power supply), but it's better (or at least, easier) if you already have the potential at hand.

    That isn't to say that intelligence is all you need to be a totally kick-ass person, just that it can help.

    IQ is just one of many dimensions of a person, and it's certainly useful, when taken in context, in evaluating, in some ways, a person.

    Or put another way, any talk of IQ always seems to degrade to, "having a high IQ doesn't make you a good person," which immediately leads to, "IQ is useless!" Well, being a good person doesn't make you able to learn 5 languages, or advanced calculus, etc, but that doesn't make being a good person useless, does it? So why should it be the other way around?

    Finally, I'd like to address the issue of, "IQ tests don't measure 'intelligence', they measure one's ability to solve an IQ test." That's mostly true, and important to keep in mind, but if the tests didn't work, you'd expect 'idiots' to score high sometimes, and 'geniuses' to score low sometimes, beyond any level of statistical usefulness. This is obviously not the case.

    Unfortunately, we don't really understand the workings of the mind in enough detail to measure (or even define) 'intelligence' like we can measure and define a length, or mass. That doesn't make the ideas of 'intelligence' or 'IQ' useless, it just limits the certainty of the conclusions we can draw from them.

  122. The real ones don't need it. by Isldeur · · Score: 1


    I work in the medical field and I've had the opportunity to meet a few of medicine's really bright people.

    And none of them seem to want or need other people patting them on the backs telling them how smart they are.

    1. Re:The real ones don't need it. by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, the medical field has plenty of individuals who entered said field primarily because they felt the need to demonstrate that they are better than the rest of us because they are doctors.
      I believe it is the hospital that has the strict hierarchy of what medical instrument one can wear which depends on what your job is.
      Becoming a doctor involves submitting to a selection process which is absurdly arbitrary and wasteful. At least Mensa(of which I am not a member) bases admission on tests which don't require intensive study. The point of IQ tests is that they are not supposed to measure attributes dependent on a person's education. Mensa would admit anyone who passed their test, where at least the AMA is in the business of limiting the supply of doctors to a level that will maintain the high income levels of those already admitted.

      --
      "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
    2. Re:The real ones don't need it. by Isldeur · · Score: 1

      At least Mensa(of which I am not a member) bases admission on tests which don't require intensive study.

      You my friend need to understand more of what medicine is. It is not creative. At all. It requires you to learn huge amounts of information that initially don't make complete sense. It's not as much about being smart as being willing to put in the time. O.k., so the tests are long and grueling. So are the hours. Believe me - there are few things probably as difficult as making important decisions after tearing around chaotically for 32-36 hours with hardly time to eat. You need to know the information cold - you're not going to be able to figure out crap on the spot then.

      The number of doctors is limited by congress because they're the ones that foot the bill for the residency training.

  123. Mensans aren't all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, of course, there are some Mensa members who are arrogant. But arrogance and IQ are unrelated.

    There seems to be an assumption by most people posting to this thread that anyone who joins Mensa does so to prove that they are intelligent.

    There also seems to be an assumption that members of Mensa generally shout it to everyone who doesn't want to listen.

    How many members do you know who don't shout it about?

    I am a Mensan, and I joined to get access to people and activities which help stretch me - because I enjoy being stretched.

    I'm very dissapointed in the reactions from most people on this thread, giving a label of arrogance to every Mensa member.

    Only my close family know that I am a member, and I know I'm not the only member who does not have any interest in advertising it.

  124. Which shows once again... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    ... just because you're smart doesn't mean you have common sense. Or taste, for that matter. I mean, come on... Would you normally hang around with some fat guy in a butterfly suit?

    --
    That is all.
  125. MSN marketing for the masses by CPgrower · · Score: 1

    If MSN were smart, they'd hire Information Professionals such as librarians with experience in online searching; individuals who are able to formulate an effective search strategy by identifying entities which describe a given subject; individuals
    who understand how MSN indexes documents; individuals who are concerned with a database's precision and recall. High IQ alone does not make one an effective searcher. How many of Mensans have experience searching serious databases such as Dialog or Lexis/Nexis?

    Precision = the ratio of relevant search results for a given input subject by the total number of search results returned.

    Recall = the ratio of the number of relevant search results returned for a given input subject by the total number of relevant search results in the online database for that given subject.

  126. Re:Mensa means a whole different thing in Spanish. by ajlitt · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the members of MENSA refer to themselves as menses.

  127. Re: MENSA IS FAIR by bodukai · · Score: 1

    Mensa accepts a bunch of test scores for entry; ones that fall to the right of the bell curve. So pick your poison. If Mensa itself tests you, you're given two tests. The Wunderlic and the MAT, Mensa Acceptance (Aptitude?) Test. get in the top 2% on either of these and you're in. You can also take any administered IQ test and use those scores.

    These tests are not all like the Mensa Quiz book puzzles - those are meant as brain teasers, not testers. Any test for entry into Mensa WILL test left AND right brain functioning. Spatial reasoning, pattern-recognition, language skills, vocabulary, reading comprehension, memory, and analogies are all used, too. Can anyone say that's not a round set by which to measure IQ?

    These tests are also timed - anyone can get all of these problems if given enough time. These tests are designed to force you to learn the rules, and navigate by them in the time allotted. In other words, can your brain quickly adapt to a new environment?

    Have trouble with English? take it in your own language with an International chapter.

    These tests measure a lot of things, not just puzzle-solving ability. There are many brilliant people who don't do well on tests, that's for sure. But for catching most of them, these tests are the best we have.

    IQ is no measure of a man or woman - everyone should know that. My IQ score is in the top 1% in the world. BFD! So I'm one of the smartest 60 MILLION people in the world - BFD! I don't look down on anyone, not while I've my own flaws to work out.

    I just joined for the trivia competitions.

  128. but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    academia is a more legitimate candidate for "the community of the intelligentsia", but there's still a lot of bullshit even there

    GrimRC

    1. Re:but by woah · · Score: 0

      True. There's bullshit everywhere, because people are full of bullshit. But in general, academia is more bullshit-free than any other legit institution.

  129. New Mensa test? by vanyel · · Score: 1

    If you use MSN, you're automatically disqualified from being a member?

  130. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Dr.+Envy · · Score: 1

    I'm not gifted, and I don't have any social skills...WHAT DO I DO NOW?!?!?!

  131. That's a sorry excuse for someone by melted · · Score: 1

    whose IQ is "off the scale". He should be able to spell in no less than five different languages.

    You think English is my native language? Think again.

    1. Re:That's a sorry excuse for someone by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Actually, what I did at MS was testing software in 26 different languages.

      do you know chinese for 'sound card drivers are fucked up'?

  132. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    If you were truly gifted you would acknowledge their frailty and weakness, and rely on your own strength of ability and reason to carry you through the slanderings of people more ignorant then yourself.

    The problem comes is when you think eliminating or isolating your self and/or having contempt for ALL the "the lesser" beings whose abilities don't match your own. Instead of complaining about it you could be rationally arguing against the segments of people discriminating against you, getting articles in newspapers and raising awareness against bullying and discrimination of those who have gifts, but at the same time decrying the superiority complex and contempt those who have gifts have for everyone who isn't on the same plateua of ability or thought, you have to remember you may tbe the smartest person or most gifted person in the world, but on the scope of cosmological history you're intelligence and wisdom is tiny and weak by comparison of future generations.

    The most important quality in a person is ethics in my opinion, intelligence without ethics and without love, compassion and concern for all human beings no matter their weakness or stature is insanity. A world without compassion is not a world any really intelligent person would want to live in.

  133. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 1
    I understand your point of view ; and I don't especialy share the Mensa objectives, scales of value or whatever. But I also understand why they're gathering as they do, and have a deep and personal understanding of the reasons why they chose a scale that de facto isolate them.

    I said being a gifted child is a curse, and nearly all of those who were (and are) gifted can tell the same horror stories ; afterward, we find ways to cope with our history - for some, Mensa is a way, among others.

    If you want to understand what it is to be gifted, imagine how you were at, say, 18 years old : politicaly aware, understanding of basic economy, computer literate, and a mature hobby. Now, forget the sex and the beer, view yourself physicaly at 8,and put your 18 yo self into your 8 yo body. That's it. Doesn't mean you're creative or entrepreneur by nature.

    Now tell me, how do you fancy doll playing ? That's no more contempt against others than the look of an adult toward a child : the league is not the same, so there's no point in imagining that the gifted should interact normaly with his or her school mates of the same physical age. They may look alike, but inside they're completely different.

  134. It doesn't all "even out" by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 1

    I really don't like this idea everyone on this thread is repeating. It seems that there's some idea that people who do poorly on mensa tests, are disproportionately likely to have artistic or musical talent. I haven't found this to be the case at all. I don't think that people who excel at mensa tests have a propensity to suck at artist pursuits either. Some people are just smarter than others. I'm not just talking about acquired skills, either. What I mean is that some intelligent people are just more capable of learning and thinking about ANYTHING than other less intelligent people.

    Let's look at a couple of cases:

    1)Leonardo Da Vinci

    Here is a man who was arguably the greatest artist, engineer, and medical researcher of his age. He was a great painter, an inventor of siege weapons, and a visionary who imagined such things as helicopters hundreds of years before his time. In fact, much of Galileo's work on gravity stems from Da Vinci's earlier observations. Da Vinci's also widely credited as the author of the most accurate anatomy text of his time. Oh yeah, he was a hell of an athlete when he was young, too.

    2) A boy in my high school named, "Ricky".

    Ricky wasn't so bright. I have no idea where he is now, but at the age of 15 he had an awful lot of trouble reading. His drawing ability was on par with a normal 6 year old's, he had no musical talent, and he couldn't do long division yet either. Ricky was no master of social skills either. In fact, he was bossy, selfish and immature.

    If you are going to try to argue that somehow these two individuals possess "different kinds" of intelligence, then please excuse me while I go puke. The truth is, EVERY "type" of intelligence has a positive correlation with every other type. Those in psychology research call it "g", or the General Intelligence Factor. It's not necessarily a pleasant fact. Maybe the world would be a fairer place if everyone was intellectually equal... but we aren't.

    http://www.psych.utoronto.ca/~reingold/courses/i nt elligence/cache/1198gottfred.html

    In a similar vein, those who are good looking and/or pretty are way more likely to become rich than are the ugly and stupid Beavises and Buttheads of the world. Life ain't fair.

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.
  135. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    "Now tell me, how do you fancy doll playing ? That's no more contempt against others than the look of an adult toward a child : the league is not the same, so there's no point in imagining that the gifted should interact normaly with his or her school mates of the same physical age. They may look alike, but inside they're completely different."

    I understand this perspective, that people of greater maturity and faster growth outgrow certain modes of thinking, thoughts and activities. But this is exactly why they shouldn't become sectarian or prejudice, or have contempt for meeting people on a level they understand. I'm not saying you should be forced to waste all your time engaging people frutlessly. Just realize it is in fact an ass backwards strategy to not meet people on the level they are at and help develop and grow them from there if you are to make the world a better place and saner environment for yourself and others like you. I know what you mean because I was assaulted for my intelligence constantly growing up as well, and couldn't understand the base nature and rituals of my peers of which I had no interest in.

    It's like being in a world alien beings who are you're your 'inferiors' because you do not socially or intellectually mesh because the gap in ability and level of development is so wide in many areas. These contradictions though always exist to a greater or lesser degree, everywhere, the problem is with perception and focusing too much on the gaps and differences.

    If we made everyone equally as intelligent as say you or similar to you, if you had to live with autonomous clones of yourself would you all get along or would there be natural divergences of the million you's that ended up tearing the society of apart just through occupying different time, space and set of motion and of atoms? It's a nice thought experiment but many intelligent people couldn't stand to live with mirror images of themselves.

    I understand the reason for these societies, to find a people who are at your stage of development and who can act as peers and like family and a source of support and stimulation you can't find anywhere else. But you'd think that such a group would be doing everything in their power to recognize the realities of the world and to make the world a better place instead of just living their lives with like minded people of the same status of intellectual and emotional development.

    As long as human beings are born and are dieing the same sets of gaps will always exist until we intervene in the evolution of our race.

    The natural prejudice resulting from abilitiy gaps, cause you to disassociate from others because you're using the gaps in your abilities to justify disciriminating against association with others who are not at your level of development.

    Just imagine if you had kids and but you abandoned associating with them because they may not turn out like you or may end up on the bottom 'bell curve', you're just completely different people.

    There was a reason someone coined the phrase for their families "It's like we're strangers living under the same roof." It's these gaps and human differences that give rise to the want to disassociation, the fact is because you're more intellectually and emotionally developed as hard as it is for you at some level, you must engage and entertain the notion of coming down and meeting them on their level, or you're really not as gifted human being as you think you are.

    There is a lot we gifted people can learn from simplicity of those who are allegedly on the bottom of the intellectual and emotional developmental pile. Some of the strongest and caring people I have ever met were the people many intellectual ethicists say we should discard. Which just goes to show gifts exist in everyone in different amounts, but because you have excessive amount of gifts you should realize that your responsiblity to use them wisely is necessary if you have any care or concern for the world and humanity as a whole and making a better future for everyone, you can't do it alone, but with your gifts you can certainly "piss in riff raffs proverbial pond", hoping another gifted person will take up the responsiblity sometime down the line of history.

  136. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha, if you ask me, Einstein didn't get it.

    I'd have found out the girl's supplier for jellybeans and just dealt with them directly!

    Cut out the middle man, that's what I always say!

  137. Wow... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    ...this almost turned into a PKB dog-eats-its-own-tail spiral of argument between who is more arrogant in their presumption of intelligence, Mensa or Slashdot geeks.

    Meanwhile, yet another system administrator and proud Slashdot reader calls me at work to say that "his Internet" is "slow and broken" and then asks, "don't the routers have batteries? I unplugged my router and it stopped working." This followed by, "it must be a Windows problem. I knew we should have used Red Hat." (paraphrased composite of no less then seventeen such calls in the space of two months alone)

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  138. Mensa could use a grammar lesson [sarcasm] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    How can a group limited to the smartest 2% of the populations put an apostrophe in the possessive form of "it"? My knuckles would have no skin if the nuns caught me making such a childish mistake.


    "It's" is a contraction of "it is", with the apostrophe showing where the omitted letter "t" would be.


    "Its" is the possessive form form of the pronoun "it". Possessive forms of pronouns don't use the apostrophe. You write "hers", not "her's"; "his", not "him's", etc.

    1. Re:Mensa could use a grammar lesson [sarcasm] by Lepaca+Kliffoth · · Score: 1

      "It's" is a contraction of "it is", with the apostrophe showing where the omitted letter "t" would be. There are two different kinds of human farts: those who try to be a grammar nazi and those who fail. Even if you belog to the second, /. loves you so it ts ok. Btw, have you ever considered the possibility that english isn't everyone's first language? However I, for one, welcome our new "it ts" overlords.

  139. Re:So what ? Hmm, at first my mind saw by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    "Menses", not "Mensa".

    I occasionally delve into "Spoonerisms", and my mind does it quite quickly. My stepmom is a masters or doctorate degree holder and is in mental health services. While he average person knows nothing of "Spoonerisms" and is perplexed when I whip out a few on them, some of which are not in the book on Spoonerisms, on her, she responds in great laughter, has fun, and now I've somehow "trained her", she said.

    She thinks I am very intelligent (but I and we know I can go "off the deep end" into tangents, but, I dismiss it, self-deprecatingly.

    In 1992, I knew a smart guy who was attempting to or was considering entering Mensa. I think he was pro-Wiccan, or something like that. I wonder what the existential or metaphysical/psycho-social makeup of Mensa members is. After all, we hear/heard of the New World Order (New Urled Worder), Skulls and Boness (bulls and Scones), and so on. I wonder how many of them read "A Sale of Two Ti..." umm, I mean "A Tale of Two Cities".

    I've met some QUITE intelligent people who hold various degrees in various disciplines, yet who steadily have jokes fly RIGHT over their heads, totally dazed, as if their core program is being tampered with. It is very frightening to think that some of the so-called most enlightened people in the world are really en-darkened. They only know dollars, power, control, and suppression. They flourish only when their agenda-driven task list is steadily being tick-marked, and wretch when someone puts a damper on their activities.

    Maybe that's why China and Russia purged a lot of their intellectuals some decades back (Big mistake? Y/N/MM?). Sort of like "Star Trek's" default reset button built into the script whenever the crew lives an obligatory time-travel episode.

    Mensa, Menses, whatever. I supposed some or many of the Men and WOmen of MENsa (do they admit women?) would be aghast to hear that in 2001 I said over national radio as a caller, and wrote on the Interrnet on a now-defunct site, that I felt (and still feel)

    rove- will get us 'roved over'

    bush- will get us bushwhacked

    cheney- will get us chainsawed

    ashcroft- will get us ashened, due to internal insurrection if they go too far...

    powell- will get us colon-ized; what ever happened to My Lai reports? Did those get straightened out. (Butt, umm, but, as it turned out, he resigned his post and turned it over to condasleeza... Hmm, maybe this is to pit her against Billary... Imagine that, the wanker up there sidelines the waffling, infidelity-oriented Powell and inserts/installs/promotes/toms-up condie so as to make sure the demicans/republicrats (both are two heads on the same draggoon's/dragon's body to me...) possible ticket female choice doesn't therminate/terminate "Ah-nohld" or cook/steam rice if she runs...

    rumsfeld- is drunk on his war rum (some in the military call him Ronald DUMBSfeld; they don't like his condescending, dismissive attitude)

    ridge- hmmm. couldn't think of or feel much to say about him, and to say that the ridgelines will be shorn off.... well, didn't he leave due to health reasons... They always have a medical reason to leave....

    wolfowitz- the 'merikun werewolf un Baghdad (and to think this guy, a weaponeer, is to lead the world bank, sheesh; as said a world-known official in this matter, "This is not a job for amateurs..."

    rice- is she brown rice or dirty rice? What's next? "Japan must open its doors to more US ric"e? In Japan, ounce for ounce, pound for pound, boneless breast of chicken costs less than beef. Who the hell does Amerika think it is pushing virtually untested beef onto a nation? Particularly when the target nation (purportedly) tests EVERY head of cattle that is under 20 months old when the US discourages testing even more three head per thousand. Some say Australian beef is better. "Beef: Australian for no-BSE BS..."

    And, I referred to them, much as a talk show host did, as a "cadge" and a "cabal". We're probably in deep shit.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  140. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1

    It was just a little riff; I'm surprised someone moderated it up too (maybe he meant to click "Funny"). But I still don't see a difference between bragging about grades and degrees and bragging about IQ scores.

  141. msn = smart? by Llewyn · · Score: 1
    from what i can tell (not being one myself...), most of the 'smart' people *i* know use macs, *nix, and GOOGLE. emacs/vi is still debateable, though.

    and while we're on this 'smart' people thing... i noticed while scrolling through comment postings that many people have the same story: "i qualified for mensa, but, you know, i didn't join...."
    it makes me wonder how closely connected (within The Six Degrees, of course) these people are, and if they may all be the same person.

    i choose to express my intelligence by thinking.

  142. Parent deserves mod up, Re:So what ? by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

    Funny or Insightful seem appropriate.

    I think this post is sufficiently well written to deserve a couple mod points (I, sadly, do not have any to give at the moment).

  143. News flash! by Hartree · · Score: 1

    Slashdotters think: "Mensans are all arrogant socially hopeless geeks."

    Mensans think: "Slashdotters are all arrogant socially hopeless geeks."

    Everyone else thinks: "Look at the arrogant socially crippled geeks getting a verbal slap fight. What a bunch of weenies!"

  144. Slashdotters fail to surprise me again by ltclydefrog · · Score: 1

    Wow, you guys seem to just join together to bash anything and everything MS related. This one topic has probably made thousands of people instantly hate MENSA. Mensa people are not as arrogant and egotistical as you make them seem. I also dont see you guys bashing the groups for those other "intelligent" types. I've met more arrogant artists and athletes than people with high IQ's. It seems like all you people do is find things that are connected to Microsoft and then find a small fault and snowball it into the worst thing in the world. I hope some of you feel ashamed.

  145. Mensa by fussyoldfart · · Score: 1

    As a member (30+ years standing) I have been saying for a long time: The people Mensa needs don't need Mensa. Corollaries are obvious.

  146. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Some of Einstein's collegues asked him why he spent time helping an 8-year-old girl with her math.
    His answer was "I help her with her math, and she gives me jellybeans."


    What a wonderful quote.

    Something emailed to me a couple of weeks ago (I'm not Jewish):

    Five Jews who have changed the way we see the world:

    Moses: The law is everything
    Jesus: Love is everything
    Marx: Money is everything
    Freud: Sex is everything
    Einstein: Everything is relative

  147. From the horse's mouth by Scott7477 · · Score: 1

    Here is the society's information page from their website:

    What is Mensa?

    Mensa was founded in England in 1946 by Roland Berrill, a barrister, and Dr. Lance Ware, a scientist and lawyer. They had the idea of forming a society for bright people, the only qualification for membership of which was a high IQ. The original aims were, as they are today, to create a society that is non-political and free from all racial or religious distinctions. The society welcomes people from every walk of life whose IQ is in the top 2% of the population, with the objective of enjoying each other's company and participating in a wide range of social and cultural activities.

    What are Mensa's goals?

    Mensa has three stated purposes: to identify and foster human intelligence for the benefit of humanity, to encourage research in the nature, characteristics and uses of intelligence, and to promote stimulating intellectual and social opportunities for its members.

    How many members does Mensa have?

    Today there are some 100,000 Mensans in 100 countries throughout the world. There are active Mensa organizations in over 40 countries on every continent except Antarctica. Membership numbers are also available for specific National Groups.

    What kind of people are Members of Mensa?

    There is simply no one prevailing characteristic of Mensa members other than high IQ. There are Mensans for whom Mensa provides a sense of family, and others for whom it is a casual social activity. There have been many marriages made in Mensa, but for many people, it is simply a stimulating opportunity for the mind. Most Mensans have a good sense of humor, and they like to talk. And, usually, they have a lot to say.

    Mensans range in age from 4 to 94, but most are between 20 and 60. In education they range from preschoolers to high school dropouts to people with multiple doctorates. There are Mensans on welfare and Mensans who are millionaires. As far as occupations, the range is staggering. Mensa has professors and truck drivers, scientists and firefighters, computer programmers and farmers, artists, military people, musicians, laborers, police officers, glassblowers--the diverse list goes on and on. There are famous Mensans and prize-winning Mensans, but there are many whose names you wouldn't know.

    What does "Mensa" mean?

    The word "Mensa" means "table" in Latin. The name stands for a round-table society, where race, color, creed, national origin, age, politics, educational or social background are irrelevant.

    What opinions does Mensa have?

    Mensa takes no stand on politics, religion or social issues. Mensa has members from so many different countries and cultures with differing points of view, that for Mensa to espouse a particular point of view would go against its role as a forum for all points of view. Of course, individual Mensa members often have strong opinions--and several of them. It is said that in a room with 12 Mensans you will find at least 13 differing opinions on any given subject.

    How do I qualify for Mensa?

    Membership in Mensa is open to persons who have attained a score within the upper two percent of the general population on an approved intelligence test that has been properly administered and supervised. There is no other qualification or disqualification for membership eligibility.

    The term "IQ score" is widely used but poorly defined. There are a large number of tests with different scales. The result on one test of 132 can be the same as a score 148 on another test. Some intelligence tests don't use IQ scores at all. Mensa has set a percentile as cutoff to avoid this confusion. Candidates for membership in Mensa must achieve a score at or above the 98th percentile (a score that is greater than or equal to 98 percent of the general population taking the test) on a standard test of intelligence.

    Generally, there are two ways to prove that you qualify for Mensa: either take the Mensa test, or submit a qualifying test score

    --
    "Lack of technical competence coupled with the arrogance of power, as usual, leads to no good end."
  148. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Wherever you go, you are surrounded by the same poisoned atmosphere when people realize you think faster than they do. When you're that bright, you soon understand what it was to be suspect of witchcraft.

    Surely the writer of the above is smrt enough to know that being intelligent has to be balanced with the ability to make friends and not be a snot. Maybe s/he needs to get out more or is 14 years old.

  149. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by metlin · · Score: 1


    Why, post on Slashdot ofcourse! ;-)

  150. You can't spell Mensa without MSN ... by onedave · · Score: 1

    How about THAT for a campaign slogan? Wonder if any of the geniuses at MSN have thought of that one yet. I suspect the ones at Mensa wouldn't -- too obvious for them.

  151. Two Great Tastes That Go Great Together by ljheidel · · Score: 1

    Microsoft and Mensa...both great at screwing otherise intelligent people out of $50 and providing little or nothing in return (give or take an order of magnitude).

  152. Re:Asimov and Mensa by mrsteele · · Score: 1

    You fail to mention that Asimov joined, went to a couple meetings, and quit because he thought the people were pretentious. Quite an important fact, I believe.

  153. I Am An Escapee from the Mensa Junta by LongFlowingRobes · · Score: 1

    I resigned from Mensa a number of months ago. I wrote to the then Int'l Chmn and told him I wanted *out*. I was instructed to turn in my card and was given a refund of my membership fees for the year together with a letter from Mensa Israel (the branch of Mensa I belonged to) that said "WITHOUT PREJUDICE" on it in capital letters to top off the threatening atmosphere of Mensa. Mensa was started by two barristers, Dr. Lance Ware and Mr. Roland Berrill, in Oxford. From its inception, Dr. Ware saw to it that he, Berrill and a few chosen members in his circle would dine lavishly and attend exclusive meetings, while the "plebes" in the organization would meet at a pub. Why the "plebes" acceded to this sort of treatment in an organization that was supposedly on of a "round table of peers" is beyond me. Perhaps they knew their chance to degrade other, newer, members would come. It is indeed the case that some of those same people who ate in pubs in Ware's and Berrill's time are the unreachable decision makers in Mensa today. I first joined Mensa ca. 1980 in Miami, FL. I went to one function, a meeting at a Sushi restaurant, which was one of the most boring experiences of my life. I never attended another Mensa meeting. I did not renew my membership until about a year-and-a-half ago here in Israel. I got the creeps immediately upon joining. Despite the fact that the branch was only a few months old, the core members of Mensa Israel had already been installed in the important positions in the organization. Clearly, the clique had been formed. The Israeli branch of Mensa is run by a junta of right-wing extremists - and I mean *extremists*. Some of the writings of the Chmn of Mensa Israel were so racist and war-like that I knew I had to get away from Mensa Israel in order not to expose myself and my family to the potential danger that such writings are liable to incite in equally extreme members of the other side of the Israeli-Arab conflict. I would not tow the Mensa Israel line and I was treated abysmally for daring to be my own person in Mensa Israel. One member would stoop so low as to try to humiliate me for living in the town that I do. As an organization, Mensa is characterized not only by cliquishness, but by a generalized atmosphere of extreme social pressure to conform. There has been a filtering out of independently-minded people. Most of those who remain in Mensa are social misfits and unfortunates who can find friends nowhere else. They hang on to one another desperately. There are buzzwords that are used to bring those who might express individualistic opinions in line, "arrogant" being the most common among them. Regional meetings are often held in people's private homes, so anyone who is not acceptable to the in clique is simply not invited and cannot make the most of their membership dues. There are virtually no democratic processes in Mensa today. It is not clear how the ever-growing list of "acts inimical" to Mensa is formulated and by whom. The commission of "acts inimical" within Mensa is punished by being brought up in front of kangaroo courts, the "verdict" of which is already determined. Punishment can range anywhere between admonition (humiliation) to expulsion from the Society. Cases are sometimes made against the former lovers of high ranking officers in Mensa when they want to get rid of them. The interrogations at those inquests often go on for many hours and there are a number of sessions. If after writing this report about Mensa I would attempt to return to the organization (a purely a theoretical notion. I assure you) I would be immediately brought up on charges of "acts inimical" and subjected to such an ordeal. In fact, on one of the Mensa Yahoo! Lists members discussed how they would try me when (not if but *when*!) I return. They are so desperate to belong to Mensa that they would undergo any humiliation to retain their membership. They assume everyone else is as well. There are indeed members who were tried and begged, yes begged to be allowed to stay or to return when they wer

  154. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by wootest · · Score: 1

    My point was that if he hadn't brought the numerous grades up specifically, he would have gotten a lot of flak for thinking he's "special" - a lot of people can excel at every academic test they'll take, provided they'll take only one that they really know their stuff on.

  155. Bullshit by bonch · · Score: 1
    Computers in general are very logical and so most geeks are logical.. so we work things out and can adapt to most things.. where as the people you've mentioned and things don't work the same.


    I call bullshit. What difference is there between a guy who knows the engines of various makes and models of automobiles inside out, and some geek who knows operating system design of various computers inside out?

    This is exactly what I was talking about. Computer geeks like to make themselves out to be God's gift to the earth. Try coaching a baseball team to victory or fixing an old Camaro. They take skills you don't have, and they take just as much logic and creativity to do successfully as it takes for you to know Linux inside out.

    Have you ever sat around and listened to car guys talking with each other? The use of arcane terminology and knowledge is just the same as computer geeks sitting around talking.
  156. You all are sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdotters ... you all are sad. Unbelievably sad. If Google had sponsored such an event, you would have saluted them.

    Again, all of you are simply showing your idiotic bias against Microsoft. Get a life. Seriously.

  157. Re:Ah. You tried to get into mensa.... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 1
    OK. My point was that he seemed to feel a need to prove that he was "special" (did he really use that word? I can't remember). It would have been far more keeping with his stated indifference to paper qualifications not to try to use them to defend the validity of his own views. Imagine if he had used the same method to defend the opposite position:
    I have <list of degrees>, so I think I know something about intelligence -- and IQ really hits the mark. Mensa is fantastic! The only people who disagree are those jealous morons who couldn't make it past a Masters.
  158. In libraries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In libraries is called the tant mafia, middle aged bitter women who let into any young male or female they can and steer the older males against the younger females. They'll peck directly, too, but prefer the above methods.

  159. bravo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a brilliant troll!? this ranks along with the "concentrate on your breathing; don't stop or you'll die" troll; sincerely, I do appreciate good trolls

    have you set up a website linking to all your best trolls yet? if not, why not?

    btw, that response from the physicist with the big-titted wife is fantastic; your troll worked delightfully; keep up the good work!

    GrimRC

  160. dishonour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or rather, dishonour

    GrimRC

  161. interesting choice of words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    regarding the "vocabulary" of this hangman game you're talking about, have you noticed the themes?

    GrimRC

  162. what took them so long? and who's next? by swisswuff · · Score: 1

    mensa is not about defining, or testing, real intelligence. that should be obvious to any normally intelligent being, and most posts in this discussion reflect that. if you believe that, do you also believe other advertising?

    mensans bank on the illusion of creating an iq-society that, allegedly, contains the "top 2%" of the society. one real purpose is to run scams of all sorts. logically, you will also meet people there that have an interest in some exploitative aspects - and if that is what you expect, you will not be disappointed. "now that we are so intelligent and now that we can admit how intelligent we really are, we should not have to use these fingers and injure them while .. ouch .. working".

    mensa - as was allegedly published in a controversial article in some local mensa newsletter (was it los angeles?) - has one very serious focus on the "exploitation of the lower 98%".

    with regard to technology, many mensans themselves fall into two broad categories: the ones that run latest technology, run their own meta search scripts, and use google, slashdot, citeseer et cetera to their advantage - and the ones that are not interested in any technology unless their grandkid runs it for them. none of them are in any way interesting for microsoft to invest in.

    mensans by and large are probably not a really bright lot. they're not slow, admitted - but it took them until 2005 in order to get that search engine scam in place, and that's rather late. but they expect a lot, and they make sure they can run exploits. that's what you are looking for when you look at mensans.

    i don't know many people who can get paid for simply putting a search engine on some web site. that's the true spirit of exploiting the lower 98. maybe they will have a little virtual oil lamp on their website that is sponsored by halliburton? and maybe they will support president bush, schwarzenegger and the republicans with paid advertising? don't be upset about that either - it's not about intelligence - it's about getting paid for it.

    well done, mensa!