Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Talking with Netflix And Blockbuster

Mike from HackingNetflix.com writes "Reuters is reporting that 'Amazon.com has approached online DVD rental service companies, including Blockbuster and Netflix, to explore a partnership rather than launching its own U.S. DVD rental service.'" More from the article: "Despite its online might, shopping giant Amazon faces a potentially expensive battle to crack the competitive U.S. online rental market. The company started its own DVD rental service in Britain in December. Rumors that Amazon would enter the U.S. online DVD rental market sparked a price war late last year between Blockbuster and Netflix, which pioneered online DVD rental and now controls about 75 percent of the market." So there may be a happy ending to this tale for Netflix after all.

130 comments

  1. Don't forget about Wal-Mart by tech-hawger · · Score: 3, Funny

    they're going to be a dvd rental force to be wreckoned with, oh yes. ;)

    1. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not likely. Online video rentals are really about quality vs quantity and that is not Wal-marts forte. Netflix has a large selection of movies but may not always have enough of the most popular ones. Walmart would always have enough copies of popular dvds but would have a limited catalog otherwise. Besides if they were going to break into video rental they would have done it as brick and mortar first.

    2. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 4, Informative

      As long as you like full-frame DVDs. They even sell widescreen TVs now, but their DVD selection is still slanted towards full-frame.

      --
      Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
    3. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by dq5+studios · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was just at a wal*mart getting some food and they had a huge widescreen tv set up with the star wars frito-lays display. On the widescreen tv was running a full frame version of phantom menace with big black bars on the sides.

    4. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      Wal-Mart censors. They only carry certain family friendly things. Certain games like Grand Theft aren't carried there.

      Think an establishment like that will do well renting DVDs? Think that French film that refers to the U.S. as capitalist pigs gets on the list? I don't think so.

      Outlets that even whip of censorship get hammered in the market. If Amazon refused to carry certain books because of religious or political slants, they would get creamed, by Wall Street if nothing else.

      I'm sure the fundies would be all over the Wal-Mart to bundle Passion of the Christ into everyone's "must have" list - and that would backlash nationally where Wal-Mart can't control the market by fiat (i.e. driving all the mom and pop shops out of business with Chinese goods and making all the locals shop there) because there are no geographical restrictions to DVD rental.

      No, Wal-Mart would get creamed.

    5. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by yiantsbro · · Score: 1
      Actually they do carry Grand Theft (my copies within the series were purchased at a local WalMart store). They also sell it online:

      Grant Theft at WalMart

    6. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      They're inconsistent on censorship. They don't sell music with explicit lyrics, only the clean, edited versions. They do sell R-rated movies and GTA San Andreas. They have vetoed magazine covers that were too racy (I think Maxim?). They pulled Jon Stewart's book, America, from the stores because it had photoshopped nudes of the Supreme Court justices, but they still sell it online. In any case, you won't find any obscure titles. They only care about stocking the biggest sellers.

    7. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by Dogtanian · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was just at a wal*mart getting some food and they had a huge widescreen tv set up with the star wars frito-lays display. On the widescreen tv was running a full frame version of phantom menace with big black bars on the sides.

      Idiots! As every widescreen TV owner can demonstrate, the way to view 4:3 video is to stretch it so that everyone looks squat and fat. *cough*

      Some people seem to *really* value their screen being full over anything else. When I was at university, my flatmates watched anamorphic widescreen DVDs on a normal 4:3 TV without the black bars (so everyone was tall); and, of course, the stretching of non-widescreen material to fit a widescreen is even more common.

      BTW, is the use of the phrase 'full-screen' helpful any more? It's not 'full-screen' when displayed in the correct ratio on a 16:9 TV.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    8. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually they do carry Grand Theft (my copies within the series were purchased at a local WalMart store). They also sell it online: Grant Theft at WalMart

      To ripoff the Simpsons:

      Scene: Guy in Walmart playing the Grand Theft Auto 'Special Walmar edition' demo

      Character #1: Hey! You lookin' at me!
      Character #2: Yeah, melonfarmer. Want to make somethin' of it?
      Character #1: Well, I was just thinkin' that we could be real good friends.
      Character #2: You don't mean....
      Character #1: No, I don't mean in a burning-in-hell homosexual way. I just think that you look like a regular decent guy and we should go to church and pray together.
      Character #2: Great idea!

      Customer: Wasn't there supposed to be something about car theft in this game?

      (Two burly security guards come and haul away the customer)
      Guard: You've been warned...

    9. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. I guess they weren't going to let morals stand in the way of the bling-bling with GTA.

    10. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow, why is this insightful? First off, the quality vs quantity argument is just sort of ridiculous... wal-mart would move in and copy netflix, renting dvd's is not the same business as selling them. Second, wal-mart realizes the enormous profit potential of online rentals, and they already have a huge distribution system in place. Also, they did try brick&mortar rental. All of the wal-marts in my area used to have rental sections (i lived in fayetteville arkansas, which is about 30 minutes from Bentonville.. wal-mart HQ)

    11. Re:Don't forget about Wal-Mart by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      I bought my copy of GTA:SA at "the mart"

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  2. dvd streaming? by rovingeyes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amazon has been one of the innovative online business for a long time. How about streaming rental service? Strike a deal with Tivo or somebody else. Why don't they still embrace the future?

    1. Re:dvd streaming? by hendridm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How great it would be for me to turn on my media center, click Movies, and choose from PPV movies streamed ala Amazon, Netflix, etc. Very cool, assuming the quality was fairly decent and the price was in line with local rentals.

    2. Re:dvd streaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Embracing the future is only a good idea if you can make the future happen NOW. Otherwise, you're selling spare flux capacitors to a market that doesn't have a Delorian.

      Streaming media SUCKS. You get dropped frames, a very tiny viewing area, and most of us don't watch movies on our PC. Sorry, but until broadband is something it really isn't today, you're out of luck.

    3. Re:dvd streaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who owns such an online DVD rental business I can say that the technology isn't the biggest barrier - it's political and fiscal change within production and distribution companies.

      For an online DVD provider to want to stream they would have to have a per viewing fee to pay to the production and distribution companies with rights to the film(s).

      At what point do these companies wish to hurt their bread and butter DVD market (now bigger than cinema takings) and instead of selling a DVD @ $10 accept 80 cents?

      The mechanics are simple - DVD is too profitable for the film owners to relenquish. It would hurt DVD sales, hurt the profits in the rental market and devalue what they sell - a physical disc is worth more in the eyes of a consumer and they want to extract maximum worth for every film they make.

      I wouldn't hold my breath, my experience in dealing with any channel in this industry is that they are all old, set in their ways and not wanting to rock the boat.

  3. Well, I'm certainly in. by Leontes · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah, I wouldn't mind a piece of the pie as well. Netflix, let me jump on the back of your obviously well designed and considerably successful business. Will you just send me a check, or should I do anything else?

    1. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not that simple. What Amazon brings to the table is exposure. Amazon is without a doubt the world's largest on-line retailer with the most exposure, and that's something that Netflix can capitalize on. Most retailers or sales oriented companies would give up body parts to partner with Amazon, and that includes some very high profile companies like my previous employer who was the market leader in luxury retail.

      --
      Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
    2. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think Time Warner leases their lines to Earthlink for free?

    3. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by Leontes · · Score: 1

      True enough, with capital and name recognition, money can multiply exponentially. It's just pretty incredible to me that 'Mr. bigwig likes the idea of cookies too.' is such a big deal. I mean, it is, and but it's the stark depressing stunning beauty of economic fluidity and it's nice just to sit back with a glass of milk, and say, 'damn, cookies. that's just so damn cool, they are going like hotcakes'.

    4. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by infochuck · · Score: 1

      Right. Because nobody's heard of Netflix yet.

      ----
      Fuck texas.

    5. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by Kyani · · Score: 1

      Milk, cookies and hotcakes? Damn, I'm hungry now, time to find lunch!

    6. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Netflix doesn't have a marketing problem. It has an operational issue. Although they say you can rent an unlimited amount, they slow the snail mail process down so you'll get less DVDs in the mail.

      Operationally they are losing money on postage. The less they send you, the more they make. How in the world will Amazon fix that. They bring nothing to the table.

    7. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      Huh? I get my Netflix DVDs in 2 days pretty consistently, usually a day before they say I'll get it on the site.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    8. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Unless they can bring cheaper shipping costs. Amazon has a good shipping system, and they might (I really don't know, but would think this is plausible) have some agreements with shipping companies (including USPS) for discounts due to high volume. Now Netflix also has high volumbe - but put those two together and they might be able to shave off another 2-3 cents per delivery which is a LOT of money for the amount of deliveries Netflix does.


      As for other posters who mentioned the benefits of Amazon's exposure - honestly, I don't think Netflix needs to worry about that - they have a pretty damn good name as it is. Go type in google "online dvd rental" and you get Blockbuster in the top blue, netflix right underneath it and in the non-blue (non-paid) spot the first listing is netflix.

      People who are interested in online dvd rentals and know of amazon are probably in the know about doing online search. I personally recommend and stay with Netflix because they were the first... they may not be the cheapest (marginal) but I think overall they are the best.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    9. Re:Well, I'm certainly in. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazon.com has an extremely efficient, state-of-the-art fulfillment infrastructure with proven "Just In Time" inventory management. This is what Netflix really has to gain from Amazon, aside from exposure.

  4. What is it with? by l4m3z0r · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What is it with the attitude that _____ is dying. For instance in this case omg netflix was dying but its a good thing amazon jumped in to save them. Thats not whats happening here, netflix was never dying and they did not need amazon to resuce them.

    Apple is dying, Tivo is dying, BSD is dying, netflix is dying etc etc etc... /me is tired of hearing this kind of nonsense.

    1. Re:What is it with? by justforaday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I couldn't care less if Netflix ends up dying. I gave up my subscription a few months ago when they decided to take 6 days to send out the next movie in my queue after receiving the last one. Artificial delay bullshit is the reason I listed when they asked why I was leaving. Since then I've joined Blockbuster online and am quite pleased. Smaller selection, but I now get two free game rental coupons a month. Considering those go for $6.99/each, it's really not a bad deal.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:What is it with? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1, Funny
      What is it with the attitude that _____ is dying.

      Well, this attitude is dying. Therefore prepare to live with it for a long time.
      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    3. Re:What is it with? by l4m3z0r · · Score: 4, Informative
      I've used both, I prefer netflix for 2 reasons. Better selection and cleaner/less annoying interface for movie selection.

      I agree the articial wait stuff is annoying but, blockbuster is playing good now, you just watch and see what happens when they can no longer subsidize their online service with there brick and mortar stores. What it comes down to is that they can take losses and just soak up cash from there already existing business. They aren't commited to offering you this service, they are commited to burying netflix and then they will go back to the brick and mortar which is WAY more profitable. Watch and see..

    4. Re:What is it with? by justforaday · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have no doubt that Blockbuster online will turn to absolute shit sometime soon. They've never been concerned about the customer. I figure when that time comes I'll go ahead and give GreenCine a try. Hopefully by that point they'll have more distribution centers (I live on the east coast). Or maybe I'll give Netflix another chance, or just dump the rental thing entirely for six months or so...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    5. Re:What is it with? by Gatton · · Score: 1

      I'm not familiar with the artificial delay issue. I used Netflix for a long time and always got my movies quickly. I canceled my free trial of Blockbuster because I constantly had to wait for movies in my queue. With Netflix there was almost never a wait. When you say artificial delay you're not talking about a popular movie that they're out of?

    6. Re:What is it with? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      I just recently went to cancel my BB account. They acknowledged their current problem of not enough movies (supposedly too much demand), and gave me a free month. Still going to cancel at the end of this free one, and continue on with NetFlix.

    7. Re:What is it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is dying, Tivo is dying, BSD is dying, netflix is dying etc etc etc... /me is tired of hearing this kind of nonsense.

      Wake me up when Slashdot is dying

      //embraces for yet another timeout

    8. Re:What is it with? by justforaday · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not. I'm talking about movies being in my queue that are listed as "available now" that they didn't bother sending out for 6 days after receiving the last one. There's the separate issue of different availability for different subscribers (even in the same household). I've also watched movies go from "available now" to "very long wait" in a matter of minutes.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    9. Re:What is it with? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Actually, Blockbuster has a much better selection, from what I've seen; AND the movies are available in widescreen. Netflix, on the other hand limits you to panscan garbage and is missing a lot of classics. Better selection, widescreen, price, and free coupons were my reasons for switching to blockbuster. On the surface, the only reason for sticking with netflix is if you actually like panscan.

      I do have a big problem with blockbuster's service, however. Many of the new releases and other popular movies on my queue are listed with wait times. This can be very frustrating.

    10. Re:What is it with? by mcrbids · · Score: 1

      Apple is dying, Tivo is dying, BSD is dying, netflix is dying etc etc etc... /me is tired of hearing this kind of nonsense.

      Don't forget the biggest fiction of all around here - Microsoft is DYING... (?)

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    11. Re:What is it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what you are talking about. Every movie I've gotten from Netflix has been widescreen, and every classic I've wanted has been available. I think you're just a Blockbuster shill.

    12. Re:What is it with? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to admit that netflix may have changed, but when I switched...things were exactly as I described. I stopped being a netflix customer before blockbuster had officially launched. I'm sure my complaints to netflix about the lack of widescreen were not the only ones, and I'm sure they've widened their selection to compete with blockbuster.

    13. Re:What is it with? by wildice · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of Gameznflix? They offer DVDs and Games for the same price as Netflix offers only movies.
      This is a young start up and maybe squashed by the tough competition. But they are unique in offering games and flix, and thats why I think they should survive.

    14. Re:What is it with? by ssstraub · · Score: 1

      Um, widescreen is ALL they offer. It's not even a choice!

  5. Extortion? by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reuters is reporting that 'Amazon.com has approached online DVD rental service companies, including Blockbuster and Netflix, to explore a partnership rather than launching its own U.S. DVD rental service.'" More from the article: "Despite its online might, shopping giant Amazon faces a potentially expensive battle to crack the competitive U.S. online rental market.

    Ummm... Does anyone else read that as "we plan to take over your market but might have trouble getting started, so just give us a cut and we'll let you live"?

    NetFlix already has a healthy base of customers, and anyone interested in such a service already knows about them. What does Amazon have to bring to the table, other than not crushing them like a bug?

    1. Re:Extortion? by Brian+Quinlan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NetFlix already has a healthy base of customers, and anyone interested in such a service already knows about them. What does Amazon have to bring to the table, other than not crushing them like a bug?

      A stronger brand. Despite what you say, I doubt that most interested comsumers are aware of online DVD rental.

    2. Re:Extortion? by peter_gzowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What does Amazon have to bring to the table, other than not crushing them like a bug?

      How about Netflix integration with Amazon shopping? For every DVD in Amazon's substantial catalogue, a link under "Add to Shopping Cart" that says "Add to Netflix Cart". Maybe a rent-to-own scenario where, if I like a film I rent, I can get a discount on the purchase. There are lots of things both Amazon and Netflix can do to help each other, like Amazon and Toys-R-Us do, or Amazon and HMV do.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    3. Re:Extortion? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      What does Amazon have to bring to the table, other than not crushing them like a bug?

      A huge selection of videos far better than any NetFlix could possibly offe, called the long tail. This data is from last year

      He gives an example of the documenteries available:
      typical blockbuster store: 75 (.2%)
      Netflix: 1180 (3%)
      Amazon.com: 17061 (40%)
      Total ever released to US audiences: ~40000

  6. And/Or by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    so just give us a cut and we'll let you live"?

    and/or they feel that by entering the market they will further commoditize DVD rental prices, & decrease margins. This could make the business less profitable for all involved. By trying to come up with a partnership, prices could potentially remain higher than otherwise.

    1. Re:And/Or by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

      what you're talking about is collusion, and very very very illegal.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:And/Or by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      what you're talking about is collusion, and very very very illegal.

      No, not when there's an overt partnership. It's only collusion if they are competitors who "unofficially" decide that they're going to keep prices artificially high. It's not collusion if the two are actually in business together.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  7. I wonder by Nothing+Special · · Score: 5, Interesting

    what is the viability of startubg a DVD mail service right now? Are they trying to build a client base for the inevitble switch to streaming, which granted is still a few years off, or just trying to get in and steal a bit of market share while they can. hmm. it reminds me of back in 2001, when i worked for an internet kiosk company. we all knew that wireless tech was hitting the market and that it basically spelled doom for the company, but the higher ups hoped to make as much as they could and (hopefully) sell the company off to a major player before wireless came to fruition...the company was gone within 2 years.

    1. Re:I wonder by TrippTDF · · Score: 1

      I worked at this same company. We also had a graphic designer that wanted to build a kiosk that had a vagina.

  8. Already happening at amazon.co.uk by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amazon.co.uk already provide this service, which I think is backed by Lovefilm.com (email me for a double length free trial, 28 days instead of 14), which is basically the top UK online DVD rental site (run by Online Rentals Ltd). Ive been a Lovefilm member for 16 months now, and I dont have a single word of complaint about them - fast service, good rates and a very easy to use site.

    1. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      netflix is also easy/simple/fast as hell, from ca to pa (usa) it takes maybe 2 days MAX to get my dvds... i just queue up a bunch and forget about it for awhile...

    2. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I reguarly get a full disc change in 2 days - 1 day for it to get from me to them and one day for the new set to get back to me. This is of course UK only. I could (and have when taking time off from work) managed 13 or more disc changes in a month, making for 52 DVDs a month at my current 4 disc tariff.

    3. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your e-mail richardprice@gmail.com ?

    4. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Yes it is, thanks for circumventing the antispam stuff that Slashdot sticks in it.

    5. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, figured G-mail could use some more spam to work up it's filter :)

    6. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by NexusTw1n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Problem is, Amazon offer the worst deal of every mail order DVD service currently in the UK.

      9.99 a month for a monthly limit of 6 DVDs.

      Both Blockbuster UK , LoveFilm and 365DVD, all offer a far superior all you can eat package for 14, which at 3 a week, nets you at least 12 films.

      I don't think Amazon's pricing model will work in the UK, there are already too many competitors offering better deals.

      --
      It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
    7. Re:Already happening at amazon.co.uk by tompercival · · Score: 2, Informative

      A quick correction... Lovefilm.com (Online Rentals Ltd) do not operate Amazon.co.uk's DVD rental service. They've grown their own, which is one reason why this revelation is of particular interest to the UK market.

      Lovefilm.com do however operate services for Channel 4, Channel 5, Sainsbury's, WHSmith and Lastminute. Those are the ones I know about anyway, there are almost certainly more. I'd agree with you about the service quality though - and they just won the British Video Association's Home Rental Service of the year.

      Amazon.co.uk have been operating their service for about 8 months now and must have reached the 55-70,000 subscriber mark. Lovefilm.com are older and have just reached 100,000. So while Lovefilm.com dominate, Amazon are clearly making inroads.

  9. Competitive Market by ChibiLZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I really don't think the market could hold another major competitor, so partnering with Blockbuster or Netflix would be a smart move... Although I heard rumors that Hollywood Video might also be looking at starting an online movie rental business. That might be an ideal partner for Amazon, as both are fresh in the business.

    Also, for a shameless plug, if there are any Netflix users out there, and you think dealing with your queue is a pain, try my new software (Windows), called FlixQueue.
    http://www.5hyphen.com/FlixQueue/index.htm

    --
    Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
    1. Re:Competitive Market by cyngus · · Score: 1

      Although I heard rumors that Hollywood Video might also be looking at starting an online movie rental business.

      What would be the point of partnering with someone as inexperienced as you are? The only one is to spread financial risk, and Hollywood Video can't afford a lot of risk at this point.

  10. Hope they don't get involved with blockbuster UK by intmainvoid · · Score: 3, Funny

    They could learn a lot from blockbuster UK, in a what not to do sense - I always know what DVD is coming next - it's the one from the bottom of my list!

  11. I expect a little "buy now" button on Netfix.... by aengblom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    within six months. It sort of blows me away that it's not already there. Netflix knows the movies I like much better than Amazon. It knows what I've seen, what I've rented twice. If I wanted to browse some movies to buy I'd go to Netflix and search around, before heading over to Amazon to actually place my order.

    I'll bet they'd like a cut of those revenues too.

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  12. You'd have to be at the table to know by ianscot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    What does Amazon have to bring to the table, other than not crushing them like a bug?

    There's risk from either direction. The attempt to squash them like a bug could also fail, yes, and at ruinous expense? We don't know what terms are being discussed, but there would be concessions and benefits on either side. Not that Amazon isn't dealing from a position of some strength, especially because it can play Netflix off against the Blockbuster evil empire.

    Netflix is already facing Blockbuster's recent conversation to their own business model. If I was Netflix negotiating a deal of this sort, I'd be thinking that any sort of Amazon relationship could give me the presence to withstand that. I'd maybe want some sort of mutual benefits situation with respect to DVD sales off of Amazon.

    (And I don't know enough about Netflix's base of customers, except that it includes me, but I'd bet Amazon has a colossally higher visibility for the average consumer. Amazon is on the level of google, with more staying power to boot. Whether Netflix has a lot of customers or not, the question is whether there's a lot of growth left in the market, and whether Amazon's presence would get at it.)

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  13. Rent DVDs from Amazon! by Strider_Hiryu · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if I'll be able to rent used DVDs for less than new DVDs...

    --
    You steal men's souls.. and make them your slaves...
    1. Re:Rent DVDs from Amazon! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Isn't any DVD "used" after the first rental?

    2. Re:Rent DVDs from Amazon! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sigh.

  14. Blockbuster never work it by drakethegreat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article seems to favor blockbustor but I don't think they are ever worth using. They have had way too many lawsuits for bullcrap late fees over the last 10 years! I know its true because its happened to my family and we stopped using them a long time ago. Personally its worth it to pay more whether that be netflix or amazon or the two of them combined.

  15. Long Wait by Ranger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Amazon should go it alone. I know Amazon UK rents DVD's online but I don't know if it's partnered with anyone. Partnering with Blockbuster would be a bad idea. I currently subscribe to it. I thought I'd give them a try first because if they sucked I could always switch to Netflix. Which is what I'll probably do here soon.

    Over half the movies in my queue are short wait. I have about 40 in it. Yes I can only have 3 out at a time, but there are some movies I've been waiting months for. And Netflix does have a better selection. If Amazon partners with Blockbuster then my movies will all go to long wait.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
    1. Re:Long Wait by spidereyes · · Score: 1

      I was a Netfix user who switched to Blockbuster because of the cheaper price. I figured I'd try it out and see how it works. I've been nothing but extremely disappointed with Blockbuster. It now takes about 4 postal days minimum to get to my location. I once waited a 8 days for Alien vs. Predator...yeah I have problems. Netflix took 2 days and never any longer. The $3 I'm saving a month is definitely not worth it and I'm switching back at the end of this month. The one nice feature about Blockbuster was the two free movie rentals with the subscription, however I don't live near any locations so it's utterly useless. Plus the one time I was in a store I didn't have the coupon with me and they don't have any connection with the online store and the brick and mortar store. Unbelieve those non-integrated lying no late fees bastards.

      --

      I say we just grow up, be adults and die.
  16. Just buy it by Raindeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Netflix would fit quite well with the range of products that Amazon has. Amazon has good relations with its customers already, now it could tie them up with a subscription service. If they do it well, the customer gets referrals to movies they might never have thought of and Amazon might use information on viewing habits to suggest books. If Amazon/Netflix are smart, they will also start video on demand.

  17. I've heard of a good rental service.. by Digital+Warfare · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..its called Bit Torrent, and is usually quicker than Blockbuster !

    --
    "Sweet llamas of the Bahamas !"
  18. Dear AOL User by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Apple is dying, Tivo is dying, BSD is dying, netflix is dying etc etc etc... /me is tired of hearing this kind of nonsense."
    Dear AOL user,

    It has become apparent to me that you have mistakenly found your way on to Slashdot.org. I do not blame you for your misplaced comments. You likely felt right at home, with Slashdot's prevalent use of Internet abbreviations and lack of capitalizing proper nouns.

    However, you may not be aware that the use of "/me" is not a valid Slashdot command. Rather, it makes you sound like Jar Jar Binks. /me sa thinks you lika jar jar. I only bring this to your attention so that you don't feel alienated when someone replies to your comment citing poor grammar and misplaced IRC commands.

    Hope this helps.

    Sincerely,
    NetZero User

    1. Re:Dear AOL User by DavesWorld334 · · Score: 1

      I thought the comment was vaguely funny but somewhat mean until I saw the signature (NetZero User), which makes it pretty damn funny. :D :D :D

    2. Re:Dear AOL User by eibon · · Score: 1

      AOL!

    3. Re:Dear AOL User by TerminaMorte · · Score: 1

      Dear NetZero User,

      ....

      /part *throws down a smoke bomb*

      Sincerly,
      Robot Ninja

  19. Smart, this is a loser business by Ars-Fartsica · · Score: 0

    Low barrier to entry (just buy a library of the new releases from the last three years, which constitute 99% of rentals, throw up a website, set up a wharehouse, voila). Umpteen different companies have the resources to get into this business if they want, which means it will be impossible to make a lot of money at it. At best this will end up being a complementary service to more high-margin businesses elsewhere in a firm's offerings.

    1. Re:Smart, this is a loser business by awfar · · Score: 1

      And,
      the elephant in the room, WalMart, is already in the business. Don't think they won't cut prices to bottom when possible. In fact, they may already use Netflix as a subcontractor?

  20. Stand firm, Amazon! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a Netflix fan, but think Amazon should go it alone for no other reason than I love a price war. :)

    1. Re:Stand firm, Amazon! by IdJit · · Score: 1

      Absolutely! There's nothing to be gained for the consumer if Amazon sponges off Netflix {and/or} Blockbuster. Amazon should have no trouble doing this on their own.

    2. Re:Stand firm, Amazon! by RussianLD · · Score: 1

      The consumers and Amazon will lose if Amazon doesn't do this through a partnership. By sending out their own DVDs, Amazon ends up owning property in every state. You can figure out what the implications are and I don't have to tell you that consumers hate paying taxes on online goods.

    3. Re:Stand firm, Amazon! by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I'm fairly certain that laws dealing with a "physical presence" in a state don't apply to someone who owns a DVD that's in that state. I received a DVD from Amazon that was cracked when it arrived. They sent me a replacement before I actually returned the original, with the understanding that the original DVD was their property and I was responsible for returning it to them. Does this mean they had a presence in my state until the package with their DVD in it crossed the state line?

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  21. Re:I expect a little "buy now" button on Netfix... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Netflix seem to be a more likely partner than Blockbuster from Amazon's viewpoint. They already have a well established customer base and architecture. On the other hand Blockbuster may have a greater interest in tapping into Amazon's online presence and architecture and be willing to offer more for the opportunity. My guess is that Amazon will still end up in a deal with Netflix because it will avoid the risk of another Toyrus situation.

  22. AOL is dying by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    :) [EOM]

  23. Tivo + Netflix by Therlin · · Score: 2, Informative

    They are already doing that. Story link

    1. Re:Tivo + Netflix by Therlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I should have said that they are already PLANNING on doing that (it has not been demonstrated yet, at least not in front of the public)

  24. There's certainly room for another player by gearmonger · · Score: 1
    This online DVD rental biz is certainly far from saturated. With Amazon's excellent distribution network already established, and their penchance for customer service, I would guess they'd do quite well.

    My hunch about why they're looking to partner is that online DVD rental may turn out to be a business with a fairly short lifespan. Everyone and their mother is coming out with plans to deliver video content on demand via every possible medium, so physical delivery of those oh-so-easily-copied silver discs could be risky.

    The one thing that might keep it alive for a while is the rise of HD DVDs, but by the time those are prevalent, we might all be wondering why physical media are even necessary any more.

  25. Simple. rent out pr0n by British · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If Amazon wants to compete like mad in the dvd mail-order rental, start with pr0n. Get a huge library, make some partnerships with adult title companies(for bulk discounts, exclusive deals, whatever), and add that to the regular movie library. Also, don't charge exorbant prices. Treat it like a regular movie, but maybe add a dollar to the rental cost, just cuz you can.

    Well-known retailer + pr0n + no shame of walking out of the adult section with it = 3. profit!

    1. Re:Simple. rent out pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then the next time I go to Amazon and it suggests products that I may like, I'll have a random selection of manga and their latest vibrators?

    2. Re:Simple. rent out pr0n by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you're looking for already exists. I think it's called Blue Door Video. I'd send a link, but I'm at work right now, and probably shouldn't be searching for that sort of thing... :)

    3. Re:Simple. rent out pr0n by kmhebert · · Score: 1

      I actually completely agree with this. If Netflix (or another company) offered some pornos with their current selection, their profits would explode. And that's not all that would explode, OH YEAH!!!

      --
      Regular Meta Moderators are not more likely to get mod points.
    4. Re:Simple. rent out pr0n by rrkap · · Score: 1

      Well-known retailer + pr0n + no shame of walking out of the adult section with it = 3. profit!

      I'm suddenly qeuasy thinking of sticky DVD sleeves. eeeew

      --
      I like my beverages with warning labels!
    5. Re:Simple. rent out pr0n by Adrilla · · Score: 1
      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  26. Can't use it.... by FirstNoel · · Score: 1

    Doesn't like my full name, says it's not valid for a free trial.

    Sean D.

    --
    "Hmm. I am to metaphor cheese as metaphor cheese is to transitive verb crackers!"
    1. Re:Can't use it.... by ChibiLZ · · Score: 1

      Sorry, send me an e-mail at support@5hyphen.com and we'll see what we can do. It is still in beta, not perfect... yet. Thanks!

      --
      Don't buy WoW Gold! Make it yourself!
  27. Re:I expect a little "buy now" button on Netfix... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 1

    There used to be a link to buy the DVD from buy.com on each Netflix movie page. It disappeared a little while ago.

  28. Amazon & Blockbuster would work well together by mtg101 · · Score: 1

    If someone online, like Amazon, and someone offline, like Blockbuster, got together and provided a truly integrated service it would be much better than the current syystem.

    Imagine a system where you pay your 10 euro a month to rent up to 2 DVDs at a time. Initially you happen to sign up online at Amazon and get your first 2 DVDs sent to you in the post.

    When you finish one of those DVDs you could decide that instead of sending it back in the post, you just pop down to Blockbuster and return it and immediately pick up another DVD. This DVD, like the ones from online, would have no late fees, and you can return it either to ANY blockbuster, or just mail it back to Amazon.

    This gives the customer the benefits of both an online system like Amazon.co.uk's and a local shop like Blockbuster.

  29. Re:Netflix 'Backups' by spidereyes · · Score: 1

    So what day does the FBI show up? Did you not find the need to capitalize Thursday.

    --

    I say we just grow up, be adults and die.
  30. Blockbuster helped Pioneer online DVD rentals? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could have sworn Netflix was the first to offer this years before Blockbuster entered the arena, and Blockbuster had to throw a ton of cash just to catch up with the added bonus that they can advertise this service locally in every store they own.

    Having used both services, its pretty obvious that Blockbuster didnt add anything original to the online rental service. The only difference (aside from the packaging and web site layout) is that Netflix has more distro centers. Both services list a distro center in Seattle, but its a lie. Netflix deliveries go to Tacoma (40 miles south of Seattle) and im not quite sure where the Blockbuster ones go routed to as the envelope just lists a PO Box address. I do know it takes a bit longer to get returns back with Blockbuster.

  31. Agreed. There's a lot of synergy here by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    An Amazon and $NET_RENTAL_COMPANY alliance has a ton of synergy.


    After all, there's two revenue streams when it comes to DVDs - rental and resale.


    Netflix has an excellent rental model, but a nonexistent resale model.


    Amazon, OTOH, is positioned in the exact opposite.


    This synergy can combine both models' strengths and potentially increase revenue significantly.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  32. Netflix deserves to die by CyberSpaZtiK · · Score: 1
    After returning from being abroad for a year and a half, I decided to restart my Netflix subscription, especially since they now have a $14.99/month, 2-out plan, which is more suited to the amount of time I have to watch movies. But I soon discovered that this price is only available to "new customers". I called them up and told them that I could get the same plan from Walmart for cheaper, $12.97/month to be exact. It just didn't seem to get through to them that I don't give an f*cking damn whether they consider me a new customer or not. So much for brand loyalty. So they would rather make no money from me than less money? Fine, I signed up with Walmart.

    So far, Walmart is OK - mail turn-arounds are not so fast, but about the same as Netflix was when I had it before (Netflix claims to have improved this now). The selection of obscure titles and foreign flicks is not as good, but still respectable.

    Companies need to view their interface with their customers like an API - customers are going to be interested in a few parameters like price, quality of service or products, etc. The rest are totally irrelevant - for example, a company's internal profit models and metrics, whether they consider me a new or old (thus, exploitable) customer, etc. In fact, once a company has exposed the internals of its "API", they've already lost me as a customer. I could care less about all of that, and I won't deal with such companies.

    Netflix deserves to die. I'm usually for the little guy, but in this case, we're just dealing with shear stupidity and Darwinian dynamics. Walmart is a formidable opponent even for competent competition. Netflix obviously is not. They are going to get slaughtered.

    1. Re:Netflix deserves to die by Jack+Pirate · · Score: 1

      Dude, they gave you an offer to attract more new customers. Every company runs "for a limitted time only" or "sign on bonus" campeigns. TANSTAAFL.

    2. Re:Netflix deserves to die by CyberSpaZtiK · · Score: 1
      Except in this case, there is a free lunch: Walmart.

      Come on, if your competition is offering a better price (all other things being equal), even if only for a limited time, then you have to match it also for that time. This is not like I was an ongoing Netflix customer, heard about their promotion, quit the service and tried to re-subscribe just to get the better price. I hadn't been a customer for almost 2 years. For all intents and purposes, I am a new customer (a lot can change in the business world in two years).

      Can you imagine an airline price war in which Delta cuts its rates and United refuses to match their price because I've bought a ticket from them before? There is really nothing different about this situation.

      Tell me something, is it rational for me, as a consumer, to choose Netflix's higher price because Walmart's offer is only for a limited time? Obviously not. The net effect for Netflix is that they are making $0 in profit from me, and Walmart is. This is just plain stupid business practice for Netflix. They deserve to die.

    3. Re:Netflix deserves to die by LetterJ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And, if you think that competing with Walmart on price is a way to stay alive as a business, you deserve what you get as a Walmart customer.

      Any pricewar with Walmart is a race to the bottom with Walmart on top. If Netflix did, indeed, match this price, Walmart would offer it at $9.95. Walmart's economy's of scale, ruthless business practices and willingness to leverage gigantic loss-leaders means that you have to compete on things *other* than price when Walmart is involved.

      Also keep in mind that in EVERY market segment and local market trading area, there can be only 1 lowest price. Several companies can share that spot, but there is always business being done at much higher prices. Why? Because price is not the only variable in a purchasing decision. In fact, for many consumers, it's not even the most important. Many consumers (myself included) tend to actually AVOID the lowest priced vendor because of the problems that frequently come with choosing them. The psychology of pricing is much more complicated than "Lowest price good. Any higher price bad."

      If you do some market research, you'll find that oftentimes, one of the best ways to boost both sales numbers (actually sell more units) and profit per unit simultanously is to *increase* prices.

      If you're only competitive advantage is price, you had either better be REALLY good and keep that advantage or you need to watch out for anyone who can do it more cheaply because they will obliterate your advantage. A business needs a competitive advantage *other* than price in order to survive in the long term.

      As I'm not sure that mail-order DVD rental has already turned into a commodity product/service, I'm don't know how much the Walmart->Netflix price difference really is playing into decisions.

    4. Re:Netflix deserves to die by CyberSpaZtiK · · Score: 1
      You didn't pay attention to my original post. I would have been happy to pay Netflix $14.99/month for their 2-out plan, if they would have given me that option. Yes, that's more expensive than Walmart, and I would have been happy to pay it.

      And, you are absolutely right, there are other considerations than price when choosing products or services. A good example is flexibility. Netflix should offer their loyal customers with more flexible subscribtion plans BEFORE they offer them to new customers, not alienate their existing base by denying them access to these plans. This is a sure way to insult me and lose my business.

      Since you make some good points about pricing and marketing, I'm sure you're already aware of the well known fact that consumers report only positive experiences to a few people, but negative ones to everyone. And also that word-of-mouth for services like Netflix is very important. Another fact, and I don't remember the research numbers at the moment, but losing existing customers cuts hugely into long-term profits for a firm. And therefore, it's a good metric of long-term durability of a company.

      So Netflix loses both on price and flexibility here. What is left for them as a competitive advantage? Selection and delivery time. They do appear to have a better selection of titles, but right now it doesn't appear to be so great that the service is useless. About Netflix's current delivery times I can't say. But Walmart is no worse than Netflix was when I had it before. And I'm not going to stand for that kind of insult.

  33. Re:Blockbuster? by CyberSpaZtiK · · Score: 2
    So what if they are original or not? Competitive free markets are the essence of capitalism, and the reason you can rent DVDs cheaply at all, whether through the mail or from a brick-and-mortar.

    Besides, it is well known that innovators seldomly end up being dominant in the markets they created. They can never compete with the marketing and sales channels of large, established firms.

  34. Re:I expect a little "buy now" button on Netfix... by HalB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When Netflix first started, they had a business model where you could rent a single movie, and if you liked it, you could pay the remaining cost of the movie and buy it. It was awesome. I used it all the time.

    So why don't they have this anymore? They made a deal with Amazon that Amazon would get the purchase business and Netflix would get the rental business. That way, they wouldn't compete. So Netflix didn't offer that service anymore. Problem was, Amazon didn't offer it either.

    Not sure what kind of deal is going to be made, but the sure thing is that it will be bad for the consumer, since it's being done expressly to avoid competition...

  35. WalMart DVD Rental; been very good until recently by awfar · · Score: 1

    I have been a user of the DVD rental for well over a year or so; they have had a fairly good selection, and when I requested a title they didn't have; bang, it showed up.

    And, that nonsense of full-screen bias may be in the stores, but not their rental.

    Only recently have their "Customer Service" become crap; example: they keep insisting that "20,000 Leagues" is available; Disney, not the silent. It's not now but was there before, and I get canned answers from support saying it is. I see that some Disney things are no longer available, and Brazil is gone!

  36. It's a brilliant idea by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    I'm using Zip.ca, a service identical to Netflix (who dosen't deliver into Canada), and the service is really cool. They've got a huge selection of movies - 30,000 or so, I've been able to satisfy my finical tastes - and there's no late fees, something I was having a problem with before. You build up a queue of 20 or so movies you'd like to see, and they mail you what's available from that list. It's kinda cool because you never know what kind of mix you'll get: I got the comedy "I'm gonna git you sucka", a documentary on deep sea aquatic life and the anime "Grave of the Fireflies"

    I highly recommend the service (it's better than the trash on Satellite IMO).

  37. Go Wal-Mart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently lived in a huge suburbia outside one of the largest US cities and had my choice of shopping experiences. However, I recently returned to the rural area(s) I grew up in for retirement.

    It is exactly how I remember it growing up when, for example, I couldn't afford to buy sports equipment from the local shop owners because they were severely overpriced; the Mom and Pops charging through the nose without applying any effort; they believe that a business is supposed to be their money tree. Just try going to the local hardware and buying something; it will cost you triple because they know you are screwed. It is not because they don't know better, they are fully inventory controlled and point-of-sale enabled.

    There is a WalMart coming in May, and a huge regional chain is falling over itself to readjust prices, not just a few cents, but by tens of gouging percent.

    Go WalMart; screw the local "Business Owner"

  38. question for old time netflix customers by mapmaker · · Score: 1
    when they decided to take 6 days to send out the next movie in my queue

    Is the rumor true that Netflix sends movies out faster to new customers and gradually slows down the longer you've been with them?

    I'm a Netflix n00b - been with them about 2 months - and I couldn't be more pleased with their turnaround time. I drop a disc in the mail Monday, the next one is at my house Tuesday. I live in DC and they've got a distro center in the DC burbs, so that may be part of the reason, but I'm wondering if this is mainly just a temporary phenomenon because I'm a new customer

    1. Re:question for old time netflix customers by justforaday · · Score: 1

      It is absolutely true. I live in DC, too. When I first moved here and signed up with them I was having one or two day turnarounds. After about 6 months it lagged to the 6 days I mentioned above (that was the extreme - average was about 3-4 days). Blockbuster online's distro center is also in Gaithersburg, so you may want to consider them when Netflix starts lagging on you.

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:question for old time netflix customers by bay43270 · · Score: 1

      Is the rumor true that Netflix sends movies out faster to new customers and gradually slows down the longer you've been with them?

      No, it's more complicated than that. Presumably, Netflix has algorithms to calculate who should get which movies based on how fast they return them, where they live, and (if you believe the rumors) how long you've been a member. They alter these algorithms constantly, so the behavior people talk about now may have changed by the time you sign up.

      I've used Netflix for years. I have spells where I've turned around movies overnight. During those periods, I was much more likely to get new releases (they need to buy less copies, if they get them back right away). If I sit on movies for a few weeks, the first few movies on my queue switch to "long wait". I keep a long enough queue that it really doesn't concern me.

      But since all we really have to work with is anecdotal evidence, I'll offer mine... over the last few years, shipping times for me have dropped from 6 days to 2 (mostly due to distribution centers getting closer and closer to me). On occasion I won't get a movie for 4 days after sending one back. After the third day, I begin to wonder if it got lost in the mail.

    3. Re:question for old time netflix customers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The common theory (though obviously, nobody other than Netflix knows for sure) is that it depends mostly on your turnaround time. If you receive three movies on Monday, return three movies on Tuesday and repeat this pattern consistently, you'll most likely hit the "Very Long Wait" when it comes to receiving a new release.

      I tend to receive three movies on day one. Watch one, sometimes two movies on day one. Mail one or both off that evening, watch the next movie(s) on day two, mail them off in the evening. With that pattern, I've never been throttled... I always get next-day turnaround rates (ie, I send off a movie today, they receive it tomorrow, I get my next movie the next day).

  39. Will Amazon bring IMDb? by rsadelle · · Score: 1

    I hope Amazon partners with Netflix. I'd love to be able to add to my queue from an Amazon page, but it would be even better to add to my queue from an IMDb page.

    1. Re:Will Amazon bring IMDb? by ElyseMyers · · Score: 1

      I agree, that's a great concept. I'm very netflix loyal -- they've been great about offering pretty obscure titles that i have a hard time finding at video stores around DC. As far as blockbuster is considered, i hope that netflix gives them a run for their buck. especially after that "no late fees" scam that they tried to pull on everyone. I wouldn't be surprised if the bad buzz about them resulting from this little stunt put a serious dent in thier earnings. Its been a fun and interesting road, watching Amazon grow over the past several years -- here's to a great partnership w/ netflix.

    2. Re:Will Amazon bring IMDb? by death_cheese · · Score: 1

      rsadelle, there is a greasemonkey script that will add Neflix links to IMDb pages.

  40. As a Netflix shareholder....what each gets.... by PortHaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Netflix isn't dying...it's in fact the market leader. But it's got some potential competitors who are traditionally "killer competition"

    WalMart - kills competitors in markets it enters

    Blockbuster - killed off most of the mom & pop rental stores

    Amazon - is the dotcom that survived the dot boom/bust

    Netflix - is the company that came up with a new business model and grew

    However, investor/industry analysts are nervous about it because they don't know if it has staying power. There is strong potential competition (which Netflix has more than held it's own against). And there is the upcoming (for certain eventually just unknown time of arrival) of download on demand.

    What Netflix has going for it in the industry.
    - established
    - market dominance
    - market presence
    - best interface

    So what does Amazon get and offer Netflix. Amazon will save hundreds of millions of dollars. It will also become an "umbrella" of sorts to the investor community who will see an Amazonian partnership as a assurety of long-term livability for Netflix. And guarantee a mutually beneficial symbiotic advertising relationship. Got to Netflix from Amazon, and from Amazon to Netflix.

    - The Saj

  41. Amazon, don't do it unless you do it well! by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

    I've been using Netflix for about a year and a half now. I get anywhere from 10 to 16 movies a week with its 8 movies at a time deal.

    Maybe I'm just lucky, but I get a three-day turn around on movies. E.g., if I mail them back on Monday, it'll get them Tuesday and mail back the same day, which means I'll get the new ones on Wednesday.

    Contrast that to the god-awful experience I had with Blockbuster. It would take about 9 days to get a movie and the same going back. In fact, TWO MONTHS after quitting, they finally got a movie I sent back two months earlier. TWO FIGGIN' MONTHS TO GET A MOVIE?!

    Either Blockbuster is the most incompetent service ever or the company is intentionally trying to make internet/ DVD rental services look bad to the general population, to protect their bread and butter rental brick and mortar stores.

    So a message to Amazon, unless you can guarantee a three day turn around like Netflix, don't even friggin' bother!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  42. What else? by Ratbert42 · · Score: 1

    What else could Amazon have in mind? Amazon has a large distribution system, but's more centralized than Netflix's. What if Amazon wants to stage popular books at Netflix facilities to get quicker shipping? What if Amazon wants to rent books or CDs (ending up in a court battle)?

  43. Re:I expect a little "buy now" button on Netfix... by MegaFur · · Score: 1

    Unless Netflix puts back the "buy now" button only now it sends you off to amazon's site to handle actual purchasing.

    And, while you're browsing DVDs on amazon's site, they could add a "rent now" button that links over to Netflix.

    I mean, yeah it probably won't happen, but it could.

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  44. USPS discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Never heard of the USPS giving discounts for volume. They do price according zones, and in standard bulk mailing it is generally cheaper for you to ship to the local USPS mail hub than from a central location.

    I know this from talking to the shipping manager at Adam & Eve. If you want to see how people ship postal with large volumes, remember $ex $ales.

  45. Netflix is better by StarTux · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster seem to have issues with many titles out of stock, whilst I am not getting this issue from Netflix. Hard to say who carries more as I find hard to find titles on either site (Netflix recently added The DamBusters and The Cruel Sea, which is very hard to get and not listed on Blockbuster, but there are some titles on Blockbuster that Netflix do not have).

    Oh and lastly, I see that Blockbuster can be slow with shipping and receiving these DVD's, maybe they will get better with time?

  46. $.02 by jbolden · · Score: 1

    For what its worth you anyone lurking might want to look at DVD Rentz. They have good service reasonable prices and carry the full range of video rentals.

  47. This is great by Winterblink · · Score: 1

    Now Apple only has to partner with or acquire one company to turn themselves into one hell of a media provider. :)

    --
    "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
    -Hoban Washburn
  48. Re:Hope they don't get involved with blockbuster U by StarTux · · Score: 1

    Haha, so true! Or its not even a movie you added to your list...