Slashdot Mirror


Is Enterprise Heading To Canada?

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that the TrekUnited fan campaign a few weeks ago partnered with a group of Canadian production companies to pitch a co-production deal for 'Star Trek: Enterprise' to Paramount. As part of this deal, production would be moved up to Canada, and TrekUnited and the Canadian group would share the costs of a fifth season with Paramount. Apparently Viacom executives are considering the proposal, despite another branch of Paramount saying the cancellation was final just a few days ago."

335 comments

  1. Canada by elid · · Score: 5, Funny

    To boldly go where no man has gone before :-)

    1. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To go boldy...

      You'd think they'd fix the split infinitive one of these series.

    2. Re:Canada by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      To boldly split infinitives that no one has split before!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Canada by InvalidError · · Score: 2, Funny

      Canada?

      I've been there... actually, I'm still there and so are ~30M other people!

    4. Re:Canada by Kimos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hope it works out! I'm not sure if all those American actors and production teams are used to working in our studio igloos. They'll probably have Enterprise spend lots of time visiting Andoria.

      Hahahahaha... *wipes tear* I love Canada.

    5. Re:Canada by tmcmsail · · Score: 1

      This should keep the Canadian birth rate down... I guess that would be where no REAL man has gone...

      --

      What OS do you want to abuse today?

    6. Re:Canada by fm6 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Need I point out that William Shatner is Canadian? Besides, a lot of U.S. TV shows are produced there. Including an unlikely number of SF shows: Stargate SG-1, X Files, Outer Limits, to name a few. Production costs are lower north of the 49th, for reasons I'm not entirely clear on.

      Of course, this is all more Trekkie lameness. Even if they can raise the money to produce the show, Viacom is not going to hand over one of its biggest properties to outsiders, even one that has not been making them money. When a property turns unprofitable they usually sit on it for years, hoping it becomes profitable if they hold it off the market long enough.

      They might agree to sell the Trek franchise. But not cheaply. If anybody can raise that kind of money, they should start their own SF franchise, not fritter it away trying to revive one that wore out years ago.

    7. Re:Canada by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      They did at the beginning of Enterprise, when they showed the guy from First Contact making the "where no man has gone before" speech.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    8. Re:Canada by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      Woo hoo!

      Now we can get the production quality of The StarLost. (For those that haven't seen the show, don't bother. For other starlost fans, I'm afraid it'll never fly again, even from the backup bridge.) (more)

      Anyway ... I'd love to see this happen, particularly if T'Pol were in town during shooting. Would there be any way for 7 of 9 to make a Borg cross-over episode? (Seeing that the show has already jumped the shark, it could happen. Imagine them allowing the engineer to have sex, and in the first season, even.)

      Come on up, Enterprise. Live long and prosper in the great white north.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    9. Re:Canada by ReverendLoki · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ah yes, Canada, filming location for such sci-fi greats as Battlefield Earth and Pluto Nash...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    10. Re:Canada by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Live long and prosper, eh!

    11. Re:Canada by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Also Vulcan is in Canada too. Alberta, Canada to be more specific.

    12. Re:Canada by aschlemm · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any mention of where they would film in Canada if this plan is actually implimented. If it's in Vancouver, BC it's not that cold. Coming from warmer and usually dryer LA-area I guess the cooler/damper weather of Vancouver might be difficult for some people to handle.

    13. Re:Canada by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the town and the planet are different places. Unfortunately, the town government seems to be unaware of this!

    14. Re:Canada by blincoln · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any mention of where they would film in Canada if this plan is actually implimented. If it's in Vancouver, BC it's not that cold. Coming from warmer and usually dryer LA-area I guess the cooler/damper weather of Vancouver might be difficult for some people to handle.

      Put down the Tim Horton's and get back in your ice cave, you impudent back bacon eater!

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    15. Re:Canada by jakel2k · · Score: 1

      Where do you think Star Trek conventions are mainly held?

    16. Re:Canada by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 0, Redundant

      and so are ~30M other people!

      ~32M.

    17. Re:Canada by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Majel Roddenberry's back yard?

    18. Re:Canada by slittle · · Score: 1

      And Enterprise will stumble upon this frozen world, and discover that all is not as it appears...

      Fear not, Canadians! The Enterprise is about to boldly go and meddle in your affairs (you think Star Fleet may be related to the Americans somehow?).

      --
      Opportunity knocks. Karma hunts you down.
    19. Re:Canada by Talking+Goat · · Score: 2, Informative

      Split Infinitives

      There are many who present counterarguments against the split infinitive rule, the most common of which is the "don't try to apply Latin rules of grammar to English." Most people don't really mind splitting them anymore, and one could assume that, in the future, everyone would care about it even less so.

      --

      + G to tha Izzo, A to tha Tizee, Talking Giz-oat, Ya'll Bettah Feel Me... +
    20. Re:Canada by wiredlogic · · Score: 1
      Production costs are lower north of the 49th, for reasons I'm not entirely clear on.

      Production costs are lower primarily because the the Canadian trade unions are weaker (less obstructionist) than in the US and most of the workers have to be Canadian. That and the advantageous exchange rate.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    21. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ITYM to predictably tell old jokes that everyone's heard before.

    22. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Need I point out that William Shatner is Canadian?

      We're still trying to quash that ugly rumour.

      ...Canada

    23. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they would still care about it more than any of us do about the future of Star Trek. Star Trek is the past. It hasn't been good in a decade or more and these last couple of shows have just sucked outright. Time to move over and let someone else have a turn.

    24. Re:Canada by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      Production costs are lower north of the 49th, for reasons I'm not entirely clear on.

      I can't speak for other provinces, but in the case of British Columbia in general, and Vancouver specifically (...and in no particular order):

      1) Tax credits that encourage productions
      2) Exchange rate that lowers costs (although with the US Dollar tanking this is less of a driver than it used to be)
      3) More flexible union workforce than LA and New York
      4) Lower costs for things like policing, municipal permits etc.
      5) General public that are more tolerant of movie crews blocking their streets etc. (as compared to New York City)
      6) Good infrastructure (sound stages etc.)
      7) Lots of locations that work well as stand-ins for other places - Prairies, downtown cores, mountains, beaches, forests, farms

    25. Re:Canada by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's not old, it's classic!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    26. Re:Canada by tawker · · Score: 1

      Well, our goverment just increased the film tax credit, so hopefully that will be enough to bring the NX-01 to a few blocks from me, which would simply be great.

      Vancouver has been pretty much every city on the face of this earth, it's time for us to be the NX-01 too.

      So, engage at warp 5, the nx-01 will hopefully be coming to Vancouver. Do you think Vancouver Intl has shuttlepod facilities?

    27. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or a better catch phrase: It's dead Jim.

      Stop beating a dead horse already... Enterprise's ratings sucked and Paramount doesn't want to continue it when they can replace it's timeslot with another hip urban-American sitcom like Moesha. Why can't people accept reality?

    28. Re:Canada by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      When a property turns unprofitable they usually sit on it for years, hoping it becomes profitable if they hold it off the market long enough.

      They're already gearing up to rape us on DVD sales. I'd love to own TNG on DVD, but at over $110/season it isn't going to happen. Paramount needs to get realistic and charge more like $30-$40 for a season.. it's been off the air for over 10 years for god's sake.

    29. Re:Canada by fm6 · · Score: 1
      "Realistic" is what people will pay. Many Trekkies spend more than that just to spend a weekend at a con.

      Anyway, $15 per disk is pretty standard for DVDs.

    30. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree, repeating something does not necessarily make it funnier or truer.

    31. Re:Canada by InvalidError · · Score: 1

      I thought we were ~28M not so long ago and that 30M was an optimistic figure... then again, I have never been any good with 'details'.

    32. Re:Canada by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      31,946,300 (as of 2004 07 01 (Stats Canada))

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    33. Re:Canada by Guspaz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Here's the funny thing, it's not exactly "no man"...

      TONS of sci-fi was or is produced in Canada. Stargate SG-1, Stargate Atlantis, Battlestar Galactica, Andromeda, Mutant X, and those are just the recent ones filmed in Vancouver that I can recall off the top of my head.

      If Enterprise moves to Vancouver (or elsewhere in Canada), it will be joining a group of top-notch sci-fi shows. I mean, Stargate and Battlestar Galactica, AND Enterprise in vancouver, soon Canada might have a monopoly on scifi :P

    34. Re:Canada by scowling · · Score: 1

      It should be mentioned that many 'film industry workers' in BC aren't unionized. For example, a production company may outsource electrical needs to a contracting company whose employees are not unionized but which does no other work except for the film and TV industries. In any given production, from catering to electrical to plumbing, you might see half of the people involved being unionized. Maybe.

      --
      www.kitchengeek.com -- Nosh for
    35. Re:Canada by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Actually, near Montreal there is a dedicated airport (ex-military base) connected to movie studio space. This is nice for the mega-rich movie people to be able to fly in on their private planes without having to run the usual gauntlet of photographers and gawkers.

    36. Re:Canada by Shifty+Jim · · Score: 1

      As is Smallville. Kansan mountain range and all.

      --
      "To surrender to ignorance and call it God has always been premature, and it remains premature today." -Isaac Asimov
    37. Re:Canada by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Production costs are lower north of the 49th
      there are a lot of reasons, 1. Screen actors guild of america. Everyone who says more than 5 words has to be a screen actors guild member, so that means they get paid enough money to pay guild fees etc... 2. land value Compared the price of land in hollywood compared to toronto? yeah, it's a huge difference, and because land values are so high, that means rent is high, that means everyone who works for you building sets etc needs more money to make a decent living.
      there are probabbly more factors too, the thing is you don't see anyone building a movie studio in minneapolis where land values are still nearly mid-west priced and there is a high population of perfomance artists etc. People build those things in hollywood ;) where everyone else is, noone thinks 'well we could do it cheaper elsewhere...' they think 'then we wouldn't be able to say made in hollywood.'

    38. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean:

      "To boldy go where no man has gone before, eh."

    39. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i wish you whiners would shut the hell up. if you don't like star trek, then just skip the post, dumbass. stop whining about "omfg star trek sux0r teh cawk rooflez".

    40. Re:Canada by Fry+a+Lad+Up · · Score: 5, Funny
      I disagree, repeating something does not necessarily make it funnier or truer.

      You can say that again.

    41. Re:Canada by BigLonn · · Score: 1

      To seekout new life forms and canadian bacon!

    42. Re:Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet all you trekkie roaches like to pour all over Star Wars news with flames and moderate every basher with "+1 Insightful" for saying "omg roffle star wars sux because jar jar is gay"

      Paramount confirms: *Trek is dying.

      Get over it. :p

    43. Re:Canada by dacaldar · · Score: 1
      To boldly go where no man has gone before :-)

      Don't you mean: "To coldly go..."

      --
      (It's ok - I'm Canadian, and it'sgonna be 27 degrees (C) in Toronto tomorrow. (80.6 F)

    44. Re:Canada by mink · · Score: 1

      Whats wrong with Pluto Nash? I think it was a fairly good fun film. Sure it's a total rip on a dozen other movies, but thats not the point. I do wish they had not cut as many scenes and added a few more bits of background/exposition in a few places.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  2. Nice... by Stick_Fig · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this actually works, and Arrested Development gets cancelled, I would drain my bank account for a third season of that.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    1. Re:Nice... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Your drained bank account and .25 cents still won't buy you a pack of bubble gum ;)

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:Nice... by Ministry+of+Cube · · Score: 1

      I hope they'll allow me to drain mine, this ~$16 umemployed debt is bothersome. ;)

    3. Re:Nice... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 1

      AD is getting cancelled? I thought the Emmy win put the kybash on that whole cancellation thing? Man I hate TV Execs, almost as much as I hate stupid TV viewers.

      --

      My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    4. Re:Nice... by UWC · · Score: 2, Informative
      Whoa, what's this about Arrested Development being cancelled? Has there been word of cancellation? I know of the reduced order this season. The reasoning did seem a little suspect (American Dad's (abysmal) premiere episode got good ratings.. you know, immediately after the Super Bowl, during which it had been heavily advertised...). At least the reduced order resulted in a hilarious gag in a recent episode (the reduced housing order from 22 to 18 homes, where Michael said "But we already had all the blueprints drawn up..." and the narrator cut in with "Actually, they didn't... but they would have.").

      Anyway, yeah, I'm mad enough that the almost certainly doomed to both critical and popular failure American Dad shortened the Arrested Development season on stupid grounds. If they cancel the show, I'll be even less enthused.

    5. Re:Nice... by michael+path · · Score: 1

      I totally missed the "reduced housing order" as a shortened season. I hadn't known about the reduced order either.

      Nice catch. I love that show.

    6. Re:Nice... by jdray · · Score: 1

      I think the GP meant "...and IF Arrested Development gets cancelled...." He just used the "if this and that" notation that's [ahem] common in programming environments.

      --
      The Spoon
      Updated 6/28/2011
    7. Re:Nice... by UWC · · Score: 1
      Then he should have used parentheses to alleviate ambiguity!

      Kidding, of course, but he did seem to pose the possibility of cancellation as not unlikely... which I guess is probably the case. Wish we could hear one way or the other, regardless. Hmm... I wonder what a season of AD costs to produce...

    8. Re:Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The current word is no on the cancelation. The episode reduction was to keep it from falling victim to may sweeps. Fox is also PROMOTING it. Who promotes a show that's getting canceled? Well, Fox is a crappy network and would do that. If it really was canceled, they'd use the ad time for Family Dad. remember, www.getarrested.com

  3. Trek is getting long in the tooth by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It needs a rest. At least on TV.

    --
    "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    1. Re:Trek is getting long in the tooth by andywebz · · Score: 1

      The last movie wasn't so great either. But lord knows i showed up. Wouldn't want my geek license to expire on me.

      --
      Saying "I'll probably get modded down for this", is a magnet for my -1 mod token. I hate to disappoint.
    2. Re:Trek is getting long in the tooth by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      I think it just needs some new writers. Oh, and it should be stated in their contract that any mention of time travel in a script is grounds for immediate dismissal.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    3. Re:Trek is getting long in the tooth by strangel · · Score: 1

      why? some of the best episodes have included time travel...as long as it's not totally absurd.
      the whole idea of a temporal cold war seemed pretty farfetched to me, but i really liked "e2" - the one with the other enterprise that got thrown back in time trying to reach degra.

  4. The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by IvyMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?

    1. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by elid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why hasn't Congress passed a bill to force Paramount to keep Enterprise alive!?

    2. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Kerry had won we would still have Star Trek! Oh wait.. :)

    3. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by smackjer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember how well their last attempt went?

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    4. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Funny
      Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?

      That possibility has past.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    5. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?"

      Uh, if you don't like it, don't watch it. If the people who do like it, however, cannot watch it because you wanted it to die, what's in it for them?

      Man I'm tired of this sort of comment getting modded up.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why hasn't Congress passed a bill to force Paramount to keep Enterprise alive!?

      They did, but those darn activist liberal judges aren't doing what they're supposed to by backing up the American Taliban Party.

      Curse them!

    7. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please, can't we just let it die with dignity?

      These "save the Enterprise" attempts are actually more entertaining than the show itself

    8. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by TexVex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, if the Left Coast crazies get their way, eventually anything and everything will be the responsibility of the legislature and law enforcement to handle. Right now, this is funny: Dispatcher: Ma'am, we're not gonna go down there and enforce your Western Bacon Cheeseburger. (Also hit the audio link.) Twenty years from now it might not be.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
    9. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by x0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if it won't die, at least let's agree to change the theme tune while we've got the chance.

      - Oisin

      --

      PGP KeyId: 0x08D63965
    10. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by ReverendLoki · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      I hate playing the role of Spelling Nazi, but I just had to point out your typo - you mistakenly typed "Left Coast crazies", when the correct spelling is "Right Wing Nutjobs"...

      </flamebait></sarcasm>
      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, if you don't like it, don't read it.

    12. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't Congress passed a bill to force Paramount to keep Enterprise alive!?

      Because Paramount said that one time Enterprise told it that it wanted to die if it was ever as dull as it is now. And since Paramount is Enterprise's "BFF" (Best Friend Forever), this is a very serious situation.

      get a free PSP

      I think I might question your motives for pulling the plug on Enterprise though, Paramount.

      (Note: If you have not seen the South Park episode 4 of season 9, none of my comment will make any sense. If you have, you'll realize just how hilarious the parent's comment and sig really are.)

    13. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Uh, if you don't like it, don't read it."

      I won't know if I've liked it or not until I've read it. Sorry bud, your idea just won't work!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    14. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by eis271828 · · Score: 1

      I think they should have given their reason for cancellation as "the original Enterprise NCC-1701 had a 5 year mission that it didn't complete. In order to be accurate to the Star Trek universe, this earlier attempt really shouldn't have a longer-lasting Enterprise - this is a logical place to end the series."

      Oh wait, Enterprise doesn't bother with accuracy. But still, it would have been a better reason to cancel it. Though, they wouldn't be in this spot if they had gone back to what made Star Trek great in the first place...not the special effects and crap a la Nemesis, but an all around good show.

      If Canada also gets some creative influence and uses it to better the series, I'm all for it. If not, then yes, let it die.

    15. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by shaka999 · · Score: 1

      Nah, I like the theme.

      --
      One should not theorize before one has data. -Sherlock Holmes-
    16. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by k96822 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's change the lyrics.

      It's been a long episode,
      now Trek will dissapear.
      It's been a boring episode,
      and Trek's time is finally here.

      I will learn to turn my TV off at night,
      no Star Trek will be why.
      No, I'm not gonna see Star Trek no more,
      because of this Rick Berman guy.

      Cuz I've lost faith in my heart.
      Paramount has now forsake' me!
      I did choose to believe,
      the writers might be better lately.
      I have strength, to move on,
      to not let Star Trek so sedate me.
      I press off on my remote...
      I've lost faith,
      I've lost faith, faith in my heart!

      From what I can remember of the theme song, that seems to match and sum up how I feel about Enterprise. :-)

    17. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      No! They want Trek collapse to the deck, feet and shoulder blades flat, with torso elevated, teeth clenched, neck twisted, mouth open like the Nancy Crater Salt Vampire, fingers pointing out, body writhing for 25 seconds of screentime, to finally succumb to that blue-green stun beam fired by forces of evil against our hero now 72 second ago...and counting... Wait, CUT...RE-TAKE!...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    18. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by Jibber · · Score: 1

      Let's not :)

      It's been a long road getting from there to here
      It's been a long time, but my time is finally near
      and I will see my dream come alive at last
      I will touch the sky
      and they're not gonna hold me down no more
      No they're not gonna change my mind

      Cause I've got faith of the heart I'm going where my heart will take me
      I've got faith to believe I can do anything
      I've got strength of the soul and no one's gonna bend or break me
      I can reach any star, I've got faith, I've got I've got I've got faith....faith of the heart

    19. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by dooglio · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I hate that theme so much, that I don't even know how it goes. All I can hear in my head is "It's been a long time..."

    20. Re:The series is in a permanent vegetative state. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Overrated. I guess there isn't a moderation for "I don't like Enterprise"?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  5. Really by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    Did we expect that any large corporation would pass up the chance to make a buck?

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    1. Re:Really by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Thank you for another canned response

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of canned responses.

      This is getting right up there with all the other slashdot puke.

      1)Post puke on Slashdot
      2)???
      3)Profit

      Get your own thoughts and opinions.

      In Korea, only old people have their own thoughts and opinions.

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    2. Re:Really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? There, there, don't cry. I thought it was mildly witty myself...

  6. Just like a lawyer! by abb3w · · Score: 1
    We could tell they were lying when we saw their lips move!

    (Still in denial... still in denial...)

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  7. good thing. by circusboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    maybe they can find writers with a slightly wider world view...

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:good thing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...galatic view?

  8. It's over you fat dorks by stratjakt · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously, it's over. Shows get cancelled.

    Get on with your lives. Paramount owns the rights, and if they say it's over, it's over.

    It's not just about production costs to the studio. It's about a shitty show that ruins the image of the studio, and destroys 30 years of "Star Trek" branding.

    They need to start showing Sailor Moon reruns to distract these knobs.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:It's over you fat dorks by Impeesa · · Score: 1

      It's not just about production costs to the studio. It's about a shitty show that ruins the image of the studio, and destroys 30 years of "Star Trek" branding.

      I don't think they're too concerned about that.

    2. Re:It's over you fat dorks by Bill+Wong · · Score: 1

      Re: the penny arcade strip Oh! Section 31!!! I would love to see a new trek show based on Section 31 ... or, at least, they should show the origins of Section 31, in the current Enterprise series.

    3. Re:It's over you fat dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Section 31 formed to combat the threat of infiltration from the mirror universe?

    4. Re:It's over you fat dorks by Bill+Wong · · Score: 1

      Hmm, according to this wiki, Section 31 was created as part of the original Starfleet Charter, which, timeline-wise would be about right for Enterprise
      Oh, and according to the wiki, it turns out, the precursor to Section 31 had a role in the last few Enterprise eps that I missed. Wow. It's time to catch up.

    5. Re:It's over you fat dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only fat dorks would link to such a shitty and unfunny comic, and use it to make their point.

  9. Oh Canada... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    As seen Wednesday nights at 8:00pm central on UPN.
    Har har har. :/

    Seriously, though. Even though I've never gotten into the series, I hope for the sake of hardcore ST fans it's allowed to continue in Canada. Maybe the show will get even better as a result, a la X-Files (only in reverse this time). :)

    --
    You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Oh Canada... by p0rnking · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think X-Files went downhill fast, when they left vancouver to go south.

    2. Re:Oh Canada... by subl33t · · Score: 2, Funny

      X-Files definitely went south, in more ways than one, when Duchovny whined the show out of Canada.

    3. Re:Oh Canada... by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 1

      That's the point I was making, trying to clarify by saying it was the reverse of the Enterprise situation. X-Files was far better in Vancouver.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Oh Canada... by blincoln · · Score: 1

      when Duchovny whined the show out of Canada.

      I've never met him personally, but Vancouver does have shitty weather. I lived there for three years when I was at SFU, and it rained over 2/3 of the time.

      I don't mean "rained" like, say, Seattle, where it's misty, I mean torrential downpours and people building giant boats to save breeding pairs of local species.

      Also, IIRC, his wife lived in LA. That's a pretty lame commute between work and where you actually want to be.

      I will say that Vancouver has the most awesome pizza ever invented by the human race, though. I can't find that three-hot-pepper style anywhere south of the border.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  10. Star trek by chrisnewbie · · Score: 1

    The only reason it's comming here is because it's cheaper and no U.S tv network wants it!

    --I didnt vote to have it here, canadian should have a say about this crapy t.v. show.

    --Long live farscape ans babylon5--

    1. Re:Star trek by legojenn · · Score: 1

      As a Canadian, I say keep your crappy TV show. We'll just watch re-runs of Kids in the Hall.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
  11. barring the canada jokes by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    which is way to easy anyhow.

    The other side of Paramount which said the cancellation was "final." There are only two things in life that are final - death and taxes. Even the latter is not always final. So given that, throw enough money or potential money at Paramount and the "final cancellation" will get changed to "due to recent considerations, there will be a 5th season of Enterprise."

    On a side note, I did like seeing Twilight again this past Friday and cannot wait for the season/series finale (though hope it is seasonal)

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:barring the canada jokes by Urusai · · Score: 0

      One day the FTC says silicone breast implants are still banned, the next day they approve them. Conclusion: mobilize stripper industry to lobby for the return of Enterprise. After all, they have an inside track to the men in power.

  12. I have the feeling ... by stinerman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think Paramount wants to kill off Enterprise because they're ready to start with something fresh after Berman/Braga are canned. It seems to me that a company that is consistantly rejecting bribes to keep a rather popular show on the air is either incredibly stupid, or has an ace up their sleeve and doesn't want anyone to know about it.

    Well, either that or they're trying to piss off the people who watch it via bittorrent (quite a few if I'm not mistaken).
    "Haha!!! That'll show you commie pirates! We'll just cancel whatever you like to download."

    1. Re:I have the feeling ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rather popular? Rather popular with a niche audience yes. But to non-supertrekkers and many moderate-trekkers + any scifi fans > 20 years old its utter trash.

    2. Re:I have the feeling ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I gotta get new glasses. I read that as "...After Berman/Braga are caned."

    3. Re:I have the feeling ... by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      That's funny...I thought they were cancelling it because the ratings were too low to support the cost of production.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    4. Re:I have the feeling ... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't have a problem with that ;-)

      Well, Braga isn't too bad. But I think it was his direction that made the Enterprise set so poorly lit ... something about it being "dark and spooky". Shit, when they go into "tactical alert", you can hardly see anyone's face.

    5. Re:I have the feeling ... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      Perhaps the engineer created a neutrino-T-wave nullifier which went out over a subspace channel and modified the Nielsen ratings computer so that it looked like Enterprise, despite being an absolute pile of foetid donkey kidney stones, was a big money maker.

      Or perhaps the fans of this show have a distinct lack of taste.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:I have the feeling ... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Berman and Braga fired? I think you're dreaming. But it's a nice dream...

    7. Re:I have the feeling ... by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they do indeed suffer from a distinct lack of taste. If that is the case then the true question here isn't "Why are the Enterprise fans still trying to keep their show on the air?" but rather "Why does anyone think there's any difference between an Enterprise fan and the rest of the television watching public?"

      After all, can Enterprise really be more of an absolute pile of fetid donkey kidney stones than every single reality television series in production today? Of course it can't be so then the next logical question is why isn't someone trying to pay for the next season of Joe Millionaire and what can we all do to help.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    8. Re:I have the feeling ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was obvious: Joe Sixpack is watching the reality shows...

  13. Not worth saving. by EpsCylonB · · Score: 3, Funny

    When good geeks go bad.

  14. So short-sighted by SEWilco · · Score: 0

    Why not move production to the Moon? That might increase fund raising just a little.

    1. Re:So short-sighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parts of Canada are almost exactly like the moon (except the gravitational pull) which is why astronauts trained in northern Canada to prepare for the trip to the moon.

  15. You mean by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

    Boldy producing what no Canadian had produced before!

    --
    Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    1. Re:You mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Crappy Sci-fi that looks like it costs $50 per episode to produce is the cornerstone of the Canadian economy.

  16. Actually by TheRealFixer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, if you read Paramount's statement carefully, it's worded a little oddly. It basically states that Enterprise on UPN is through. I thought it was strange they specified UPN, especially with all the talk about moving the show to another channel...

    1. Re:Actually by Oinos · · Score: 1

      Nothing odd about that. Paramount is probably leaving a door open to sell the broadcast rights to someone else.

      Instead of the grassroots movement to fund the production of the show, TrekUnited should have been negotiating with Paramount to buy the rights to the show and then partner with an independent production company to continue the show.

      I was hoping something like this would have happened with Firefly. Fox owns the broadcast rights to the show but would sell them for the right price. Once the broadcast rights are picked up, other networks generally are more open to discussion about carrying the program.

    2. Re:Actually by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm going to be majorly irked if next year Enterprise is resurrected on some other network.

      Basically this would come off like a major publicity stunt and would make Enterprise even lamer than it is now.

      It would be cool if they would bring it back every two years for a five or six episode miniseries, but that would only work if they covered major trek events that are already established. The Romulian war, the Klingon War, First Contact with important groups, like the Trill....but that won't happen...it will be lame.

      Oh, and one last thing. LET IT DIE ALREADY!

      --
      We are the Borg...
    3. Re:Actually by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      If they pull Enterprise off UPN that will leave what, wacky African-American comedies too dumb for the WB?

    4. Re:Actually by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      Instead of the grassroots movement to fund the production of the show, TrekUnited should have been negotiating with Paramount to buy the rights to the show and then partner with an independent production company to continue the show.

      That would have cost much, much more.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    5. Re:Actually by TapTapTheChisler · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Britney Spears reality show!

    6. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UPN should be left to die... Not Enterprise! I am pretty sure UPN has quite a bit (if not a majority) to do with the problems with Star Trek.

    7. Re:Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That...and Veronica Mars which is often considered one of the best, if not the best, new show of the season.

  17. We're awesome, eh? by Kimos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hah! And people ask why I love this country so much!

    1. Re:We're awesome, eh? by argent · · Score: 1

      Open a hailing channel, eh?

  18. ST Needs by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    What the ST Universe really needs is for Rick Berman to step down, and to let someone else take the helm. Maybe even wait a couple years, and then come out with a series that actually harkens back to the original- instead of trying to ignore it or worse. Until that happens, the entire franchise will continue to struggle.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:ST Needs by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      WHAT AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT!

      Did you come up with that yourself?

      Moderators, mod this up to +50, Insightfull!

  19. As McCoy would say... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... "It's dead, Jim."

    --
    That is all.
    1. Re:As McCoy would say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or rather ..."Its WORSE than That..."

  20. Interesting... by nebaz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Stargate-SG1 and Atlantis are both filmed in Vancouver. Farscape was Australia(?), is all Sci-Fi destined to be outsourced?

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:Interesting... by loqi · · Score: 1

      If those are the representative examples of outsourced sci-fi, then God I hope not.

      --
      If other reasons we do lack, we swear no one will die when we attack
    2. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      American TV is really quite low quality. You have your sit-coms, where a heavy storyline is when one of the characters is in the hospital for 2 episodes, your cop dramas which exaggerate and glamorize the work of cops/investigators, and then you have your "reality TV" which often bears less resemblance to reality than the other two categories of shows. Sci-fi doesn't seem to have a place in the US because people there can't seem to relate to it. I'm shocked as hell a "fantasy" show like Joan of Arcadia has lasted this long, but that's probably the God-angle.

      Sci-Fi traditionally makes you think (although much American sci-fi isn't even about thinking, any more than just trying to break outside of yourself and into the future/past/whatever) and that's not what most Americans want when they get home from the daily grind.

    3. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sci-Fi Channel is actually a Canadian works program

    4. Re:Interesting... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      We also got BattleStar though with an American cast (eeeewwww).

      At least all the hot ones are still Canadian.

      As far as outsourcing goes, Sci-Fi has been able to keep the same budget but produce way higher quality by moving outside of L.A. and really the whole concept of producing television in L.A. is outdated, you don't need guest appearances by movie stars every week to keep a show with a decent plot alive.

    5. Re:Interesting... by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      It would be ironic to have it all done off-planet, wouldn't it.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    6. Re:Interesting... by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

      The Sahara desert in Tunisia and soundstages in the UK? I'm not sure if Tunisia is politically stable, and the UK is an expensive place to be. btw... The underground house Luke lived in with his aunt and uncle is pretty representative of some of the dwellings in that area. I was there a few years after the first Star Wars movie was shot. People live in houses carved out of the sandstone under the desert. A family let our tour group look around their house. It didn't have the droid oil-bath though, or any of the other gadgets, just nice cool rooms out of the heat of the desert sun.

      --
      Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    7. Re:Interesting... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I think a lot of X-Files was done in Vancouver too.

    8. Re:Interesting... by introverted · · Score: 1
      Stargate-SG1 and Atlantis are both filmed in Vancouver. Farscape was Australia(?), is all Sci-Fi destined to be outsourced?

      It seems that way. My understanding is that a lot of the shows (not just SF) that are produced in Canada are primarily there because it's less expensive than filming the US. Shows that are filmed in Australia (or frquently, New Zealand) tend to be there because the scenery and plant life supposedly seem more exotic to American audiences.

    9. Re:Interesting... by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Interesting that this was modded as flamebait. Even as an American, this is pretty much how I see things.

      Sci-fi doesn't succeed in the States for some reason. I really think it probably does have something to do with the culture. Work yourself to death, come home and turn your brain off. Wash, rinse, repeat. Honestly, how else can you explain some of the tripe that makes millions at the box office?

    10. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? Even though all the fucking sci-fi shows you see are written and funded from the United States? Sure they are FILMED in Canada but thats just because its cheaper. What planet are you people from? Who do you think is making the sci-fi shows? Canada?

    11. Re:Interesting... by Trillan · · Score: 1

      Yeah. You can tell when they moved -- it's when the shows first started sucking. :)

  21. They can have Enterprise by slusich · · Score: 2, Informative

    But only if they start exporting Corner Gas.
    Trust me, we'd be getting the better end of the deal.

    1. Re:They can have Enterprise by Ubergrendle · · Score: 2, Informative

      For Americans who don't get Canadian channels, Corner Gas is the first significantly successful Canadian-produced sitcom in decades. Its an ensemble cast, 'clean' humour (very little sexual innuendo), but very witty and intelligent. Set in small town Saskatchewan its very different than most US sitcoms which are typically family or big-city officeplace based. Interest by US networks is rising quickly as all the American import sitcoms have lost head-to-head (even against re-runs) -- Everyone Loves Raymond, Joey, and other insipid garbage. Unfortunately American Idol still beats it though... :(

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    2. Re:They can have Enterprise by iCEBaLM · · Score: 1

      I've seen an episode or two, but honestly, even being Canadian, couldn't bring myself to like it.

      This in no way means that I like Joey, Raymond or other insipid garbage.

    3. Re:They can have Enterprise by Monkey · · Score: 1

      Corner Gas is the first significantly successful Canadian-produced sitcom in decades
      What about The Trailer Park Boys?
      They even show it (heavily edited) on BBC America in the U.S.

    4. Re:They can have Enterprise by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      I'd almost say that doesn't count, because of the editing. With the amount of swearing in it, rivalling Ozzy Osborne's foul mouth, the bleeps kill all the humour. I could never stand watching the US version after being accustomed to the Canadian version in all it's curse-fucking-filled glory. Not after hearing "FOR FUCK SAKES RICKY! WHAT THE FUCK ARE YOU DOING TO THE SATELLITE! I PAID $10 FUCKING DOLLARS! I WANT MY FUCKING SATELLITE SIGNAL! JESUS CHRIST! $10 FUCKING DOLLARS...A MONTH!"

    5. Re:They can have Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, the Merkins will just kill its style by adding their insiduous laugh track.

  22. In the next exciting episode... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Enterprise is ordered to deliver a mysterious cargo labelled only "WHIPS" to the planet Equus Mortis.

    --
    Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    1. Re:In the next exciting episode... by WaterBreath · · Score: 1

      I just gave out my last mod point. Someone get this man a +1 Funny!

    2. Re:In the next exciting episode... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      You're too kind, amigo

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    3. Re:In the next exciting episode... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh?

      I'm missing the context.

    4. Re:In the next exciting episode... by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      Equus is horse. Morits is dead. Whipping a dead horse.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  23. Canadian Trek by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    "It's been a Long Road, get*BLAM BLAM BLAM*"
    - Anonymous singer, Vedran Archives, CY 2005

    "The boardrooms of UPN are a dangerous place! But in our future, my crew and I fight to make it safe! I am Dylan Hunt, captain of the Enterprise Ascendant, and these are our adventures!"

    (What, it's not like there isn't precedent for a hot shipboard computer. Back in TOS, I wouldn't have kicked Majel Barrett outa bed either. Rommie's just an upgraded version, isn't she?)

    1. Re:Canadian Trek by IWorkForMorons · · Score: 1

      No...Alexa Doig is MUCH MUCH hotter then Majel Barret ever was. And she's not even dressed that provocatively. No miniskirts or anything needed. She's just naturally hot.

    2. Re:Canadian Trek by tomarseneault · · Score: 1

      Majel Barrett on TOS played Nurse Chapel not the computer, though she did the voice but on Voyager and TNG. Also calling Rommie "just an upgrade" is like saying a Maserati is a slightly better Cooper Mini, there just ain't no comparison. Rommie *and* Doyle? Shamus Harper is my hero!

  24. ** LET IT DIE ** by TydalForce · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    Enterprise is the least innovative and most boring Trek series ever. Yeah, its gotten better in more recent episodes, but still isn't what it should be.

    Trek needs to take a break, and come back in a year or two or three with fresh blood. I rather like the idea of J. Michael Straczynski - he did a great job with Babylon 5, and Jeremiah, and The Real Ghostbusters ;-}

    1. Re:** LET IT DIE ** by MagicDude · · Score: 1

      I rather like the idea of J. Michael Straczynski - he did a great job with Babylon 5

      That's not reason enough to cancel it now, just because you think someone can do it better. I agree, JMS could to a spectacular job with it, but just because we want it to be so doesn't mean it'll happen. I know a few months ago he said he would like to do it, but then 1 day later he retracted that statement. If there was a contract saying that enterprise would be taken off the air and in 2007 a new JMS written series would be released, I'd be the first one on the kill enterprise bus, but there's no evidence that it will happen. We might as well speculate that Gene Roddenberry will be resurected from the dead and produce a new show and it would be awesome. I think it's stupid to give up on a show in the present because there's some far flung possibility that it could be done better by someone else.

    2. Re:** LET IT DIE ** by TydalForce · · Score: 1
      Hey I'm not saying kill enterprise because JMS would do better...

      I'm saying 1) kill enterprise, its done 2) take a break and come back with fresh blood 2a) it would be spiffy if that fresh blood happened to be JMS

      trek hasn't had a break since TNG started; its been on the air constantly since 1987. That's a long time really. I don't think its been the same since Roddenberry died.

      Its time to cut your losses, take a little time off, and come back refreshed with an awesome Trek series.

  25. J2EE? My job? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

    Ah well, at least I'll get free healthcare now.

    1. Re:J2EE? My job? by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought that the headline meant at first, too. Some kind of outsourcing issue...

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
  26. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's some funny shit.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT UP by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      Thanks

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
  27. Or, perhaps... by PornMaster · · Score: 2, Funny

    To boldly escape death in a manner no sci-fi television show has done before. ;)

  28. Enterprise moving to Canada? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes them think we'd want it?

  29. Canadian Transporter by amightywind · · Score: 1

    Beam me up Scotty, ay?

    --
    an ill wind that blows no good
    1. Re:Canadian Transporter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geez , yer no hozer, eh? Now get aboot of here, eh? First it was Call for Help www.callforhelptv.com and now Star Trek.

    2. Re:Canadian Transporter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ay?? It's EH?

      I somebody's been in the buffer a little too long.

  30. Let it die by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Its time to let it go people..

    Look at the farscape fans.. We got a 'finale' and let it die a dignified death..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Let it die by Chubby_C · · Score: 1

      My sentiments exactly, its like the Terry Shiavo case if something (or someone) is dying; let them. No use delaying the inevitiable. Whats going to happen at the end of Season 5, the same thing, people are going to fight for a 6th. I am and always have been a huge trek fan, but even I never became interested in Enterprise

      --
      - My question is: Can Slashdot be Slashdotted? -
    2. Re:Let it die by LionMage · · Score: 1
      Its time to let it go people..

      Look at the farscape fans.. We got a 'finale' and let it die a dignified death.

      Um, your analogy is a bit strained. The Sci-Fi channel was content to let Farscape die at the end of season 4, even with a major cliffhanger ending that would be unresolved; it was only through a massive fan campaign to save the show that the Farscape mini-series (the Peacekeeper War) was realized. This allowed much of the story arc planned for season 5 to be told, and many of the loose ends were tied up.

      With Enterprise, we again have a fan campaign to save the series, and though some would argue the case, I would say that season 4 of Enterprise is by far the best one yet, and what the show should have been in seasons 1-3. (Thank you, Manny Coto.) Farscape was cut down in its prime, and I'd argue that the same holds true for Enterprise.

      I would argue that if the fans of Farscape "let it go," as you're advising Enterprise's fans to do, the show wouldn't have had the dignified death you speak of. Rather, it would have fizzled out and left too many questions unanswered. The season-ending cliffhanger at the end of season 4 was certainly not the "finale" we all hoped for. That's why the mini-series was such a godsend. (Yeah, I would have been happier with a fifth season, but better to get something than nothing.)

      Incidentally, Jolene Blalock has opined that the show's finale is "appalling." Not the blaze of glory you want a show to go out on...
  31. nooo, but by sumdeus · · Score: 1

    aneesh is!

    --
    Peter: I got an idea, an idea so smart my head would explode if I even began to know what I was talking about.
  32. Soviet Canuckistan by Yanray · · Score: 1, Funny

    In Soviet Canuckistan Enterprise revives you.

    Sorry for the Pat Buchanan referance. But it's still funny.

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
  33. They should (re)hire a few Canadian actors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunalely is too late for Scotty (the greatest Canadian Star Trek actor ever). They could rehire Nicole de Boer or even Shatner (may be not, he is a jerk)

  34. The short answer: Yes! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Is Enterprise heading to canada?

    The short answer is "Yes!"
    However our correspondant has learned that upon ariving there, Mr. Spock was overheard saying "What the fuck is wrong with these people?"

    Captain Kirk, on the other hand could not be reached, as he was getting smashed with Scotty and Bones at a local hockey bar.

    Film at 11: "Wrath of Khan"

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    1. Re:The short answer: Yes! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      Longest setup for a KHAAAN, KHAAAN! joke ever:

      Two Kirks, a Khan and a Pizza Place

  35. Enterprise Episodes all metric by butch812 · · Score: 1

    One thing I never did understand is why when ever they are talking about distance, they always says kilometers never miles. Is there a reason for this? It is an American show.

    1. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      evidently in the 24th century, metric is considered a superior system ;)

    2. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by Impeesa · · Score: 1

      One thing I never did understand is why when ever they are talking about distance, they always says kilometers never miles. Is there a reason for this? It is an American show. It's also set in the future where, presumeably, either the Americans finally came around to metric, or they just didn't have enough pull in the galactic community to convince everyone else to switch back to an archaic system.

    3. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by softspokenrevolution · · Score: 3, Funny

      They also don't believe in money, they're clearly not Americans.

    4. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, one would hope that the idiotic imperial measurement system dies in the not too distant future...

    5. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Funny

      One thing I never did understand is why when ever they are talking about distance, they always says kilometers never miles. Is there a reason for this? It is an American show.

      To make it sound more technical and futuristic to Americans maybe?

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    6. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone else uses Metric aside from America and South Africa.

    7. Re:Enterprise Episodes all metric by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      One thing I never did understand is why when ever they are talking about distance, they always says kilometers never miles. Is there a reason for this? It is an American show.

      Well, let's see.

      First, it's scientific - we all use metric at the universities and research firms.

      Second, it's supposedly a united earth - every single country other than the USA uses metric. Even Brunei and the UK switched over a while back.

      Third, the show is broadcast around the world - in point of fact, they bring in more money from non-US sales - and it's supposed to be multi-cultural, in case you haven't noticed.

      Fourth, I know for a fact that Romulan Ale is not measured in metric. It's measured in hangovers.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. Enormous misdirection of effort by mcc · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    So you've got this money.

    And you've got all this energy.

    And what are you doing with it?

    Trying to save a TV show that even its defenders rarely describe in terms nicer than "it wasn't THAT bad", and whose plot is going to be wrapped up at the end of the season whatever you do.

    While you've got all this excitement and energy and potential funding, why not direct it into more potentially productive efforts-- like, trying to get Paramount or some other production company to put together a new, GOOD show? (Preferably maybe even one Rick Berman is not associated with!)

    There were rumors about William Shatner trying to go over Berman's head and pitch a series set at StarFleet; I think that would be pretty damn cool. Heck, there's a lot of potentially cool ideas within the Star Trek universe, continuity-error-ridden as it is, you could set a show around. You don't necessarily need Enterprise. And even without Star Trek (though I realize that's what the people pushing for enterprise to continue really want) I'm sure there's no shortage of directors, actors etc who would jump at the chance to do a sci fi tv show, if only some people could talk some studio into greenlighting it.

    Television is allegedly a passive medium. Yet for once, for this moment, you've got a huge number of television viewers to stand up and decide that they want to participate. I think that has the potential to be pretty cool, if that were directed toward some productive end. But that potential is currently being wasted on lost causes.

    1. Re:Enormous misdirection of effort by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What continuity errors? We've seen fairly complete "visual records" of at least 3 starfleet ships and one space station. 100% of the ships have engaged in multiple time-travel events. Extrapolating, the timeline of ST need not be consistent.

  37. Viacom, Paramount, all made in Taiwan... by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Viacom executives are considering the proposal, despite another branch of Paramount saying the cancellation was final just a few days ago.

    Maybe they were planning to cancel it here, aire it in Canada, and they thought we'd never find out about it. Heh heh heh... Thanks to Slashdot, their evil scheme was foiled! I'll get you next time, Gadget, next time!!!

  38. BSG by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am pretty sure that Battlestar Galactica is filmed in Canada as well.

    1. Re:BSG by barc0001 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It is. They film Atlantis, Battlestar and SG-1 about a kilometer from my house in Burnaby, on the Vancouver city border. I see the trucks and the lot direction signs (Arrows with a three letter abbreviation for the show in question that tell the crews where to go) in my neighborhood all the time.

    2. Re:BSG by blincoln · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am pretty sure that Battlestar Galactica is filmed in Canada as well.

      Yes. The city on Caprica in the pilot was Simon Fraser University.

      When Boomer and Helo are walking through the abandoned city in an early episode, it's a CGI-enhanced downtown Vancouver. The quasi-future-Roman building is the library.

      The cinematic masterpiece The Sixth Day used both of those locations as well.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:BSG by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Vancouver holds up well when it's standing in for alien planets. But sometimes SG-1 tries to make it stand in for Colorado, which is less convincing.

      College campuses make good alien/futuristic cities. When I was attending UC Riverside, Gene Roddenberry came and turned the campus into the stronghold of the 22nd-century mutant warlords. Which really doesn't say anything nice about the architecture....

    4. Re:BSG by blincoln · · Score: 1

      But sometimes SG-1 tries to make it stand in for Colorado, which is less convincing.

      Hah. Still, more convincing then when Jackie Chan tried to pretend it was New York, I bet.

      When I was attending UC Riverside [ucr.edu], Gene Roddenberry came and turned the campus into the stronghold of the 22nd-century mutant warlords [att.net]. Which really doesn't say anything nice about the architecture....

      Excellent. SFU got used for that kind of thing all the time. I think I'm the only student who ever went there that loved the fascist sci-fi architecture.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    5. Re:BSG by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Jackie Chan movies are supposed to be unconvincing!

      Sci-Fi set designers and school architects are all Fascists at heart? That's disturbing...

    6. Re:BSG by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      And you've yet to switch all of the signs around?

      I'll give you $50 if you can get some of the cast of BSG to "accidentally" appear in SG-1.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    7. Re:BSG by blincoln · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sci-Fi set designers and school architects are all Fascists at heart? That's disturbing...

      Fascists always have the best art departments, whether they're fictional or not.

      I mean, who got the cooler uniforms in the original BSG: the Viper Pilots, or the Space Nazis?

      It's the same everywhere. Jedi vs Sith. Autobot vs Decepticon. Hippie vs Grammaton Cleric.

      I think that part of the reason the *real* Nazis were able to have such influence over the Germans* are things like Speer and his Cathedral of Light, their military having uniforms that say "I am an evil person, and I will go forth and enjoy doing evil things in style," etc.

      The forces of Good need to replace their marketing team =P.

      * Yes, I realize their other factors and am ignoring them for the purposes of this non-serious discussion.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    8. Re:BSG by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Fascists always have the best art departments, whether they're fictional or not.
      Not the best. Just the gaudiest.
      I mean, who got the cooler uniforms in the original BSG: the Viper Pilots, or the Space Nazis?

      It's the same everywhere. Jedi vs Sith. Autobot vs Decepticon. Hippie vs Grammaton Cleric.

      Pop culture doesn't count, since the people who make it are just immitators. George Lucas in particular consciously "paid homage" to the Nazi filmmaker Leni Riefenstahl in many scenes in the Star Wars movies.
      I think that part of the reason the *real* Nazis were able to have such influence over the Germans* are things like Speer and his Cathedral of Light, their military having uniforms that say "I am an evil person, and I will go forth and enjoy doing evil things in style," etc.
      The Nazi party did indeed give every German the honor of dressing up in a snazzy uniform. But they saw themselves as protectors of Aryan Purity, not evil people. The Evil Overlord cliche is 70 years of Hollywood imitating WW II propaganda movies.

      I guess we've explained why SF lovers like fascist decor -- it looks cool. (Though there's always been a certain fascist mindset in SF. Heinlen. Pournelle. Stirling keeps saying, "On the other hand," but his heart is really in Power and Will.) But why do so many college campuses seem to shout "Il Duce loves you"???

    9. Re:BSG by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Don't even think about it. We've already got enough lame crossovers!!!!

    10. Re:BSG by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Not the best. Just the gaudiest.

      Maybe it's just me, but I find images of that event *very* powerful (despite having no sympathies for the Nazis). Especially when I try and imagine what it was like for people who grew up in an era before huge outdoor concerts and pervasive mass media.

      I do need to ammend my statement about the forces of Good. There *have* been some real and fictional heroes with awesome styles. The RDF in Macross, the ancient Elvish armish in LOTR, the US military aircraft of the cold war era, Brian Greene, Firefighters in districts wise enough to issue black uniforms, etc.

      The Evil Overlord cliche is 70 years of Hollywood imitating WW II propaganda movies.

      I think it's a mix of both fact and legend. The Nazis *did* love to stick death's heads on their uniforms, and it's not like the civilian population could look at something like Oradour-sur-Glane and say "yeah, that village of French peasants sure was a threat to the Aryan race." And like I said, there were certainly other factors at work. Poor Germans, so angry at everyone, all the time.

      But why do so many college campuses seem to shout "Il Duce loves you"???

      You answered that already - it looks cool =). I mean, if I were an architect, and someone hired me to design a university, I could think "this is probably my only chance ever to work for a client that will let me do something that isn't completely inoffensive and appealing to customers of a large corporation. I'm going to go hog wild! Fascist hog wild! Deploy the concrete mixers!"

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    11. Re:BSG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I am pretty sure that Battlestar Galactica is filmed in Canada as well.


      Those fuckers! And let me guess, all twelve Canadians are starring as Cylons!
    12. Re:BSG by hawk · · Score: 1

      Well, of course. The lower tech level [*ack* This post interrupted by angry mob waving undersized dollars]

    13. Re:BSG by terrab0t · · Score: 1

      I was wondering which Canadian city they were using on Battlestar Galactica. My brother knew they were somewhere in Canada when he spotted the scotiabank logo on Cylon occupied Caprica.

    14. Re:BSG by gobbo · · Score: 1
      The city on Caprica in the pilot was Simon Fraser University.

      SFU was used for all kinds of SF shows. It was the FBI headquarters on the X-Files, that always makes me chuckle. My favourite was watching it get pummeled by a Goa'uld bombardment in Stargate's season six.

      Arthur Erickson is a well loved/despised modernist architect who plays with massive spaces. I have a friend who calls it archetorture. He gets to design some pretty trippy buildings and spaces.

    15. Re:BSG by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      That is WAY too funny!

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    16. Re:BSG by mink · · Score: 1

      Can you clarify the Autobot vs. Deceptacon example.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  39. Too many questions by molrak · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the cast would want to move to (or at least live in) Canada for six to nine months a year. Presumably they would shoot in Vancouver, which already has an established film industry in place, so it wouldn't be like they were moving to Moose Jaw, but it's still a major change. If it's being funded by Canadians, there's also US $ to Can $ issues to consider. Not only that, but it's possible that cast members may already have other commitments. There's also the question of having to deal with an entirely new production crew, and possibly a different CG crew.

    That's a lot of questions for a show which hasn't attracted viewers over a span of four years. One could argue that UPN's mismanagement of Enterprise has led to its low ratings (or UPN's lack of availability outside of major metropolitan areas), but sometimes a bad show is just a bad show.

    --
    You're only as smart as your brain.
  40. Time slot. by Belgand · · Score: 1

    Not to say that it wasn't due to the poor writing, acting, etc. but I one of the thing that may have contributed to the death of Enterprise is the lack of a consistent time slot. I don't know how UPN had this thing scheduled, but in my local market the new episodes were run at 2:30 am. Not a rebroadcast of the same episode shown earlier that evening, that was the only time they ever showed it.

    1. Re:Time slot. by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      Another major problem with Enterprise on UPN is that on any given Friday (happened with Wednesdays too) during basketball season, 30% or so of the alleged "network affiliates" pre-empt the Network programmign for their local NBA francise. Even here in Orlando, where the majority of the town stopped caring about the "Magic" YEARS ago.

      Kind of hard to maintain a decent rating when 1/3 of your market isn't counted on a given week.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  41. Anyone see the news on the cast wrap party? by ravenspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The actors seem to know something you all don't.

    This show is as dead as a doornail right now and won't be coming back.

  42. And thus the episode began by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    Officer: Captain! A group of geeks and Canadians are so willing to help our fledgling Enterprise that they have expressed interest in even helping to pay for our ship's repairs!

    Captain: Excellent! Bring them aboard, make them Ensigns, then set course for Romulus! Warp 9!

  43. Canada gave us Captain Kirk and Scotty by SubDude · · Score: 1

    People seem to forget.

    Dude

    1. Re:Canada gave us Captain Kirk and Scotty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kirk is from Iowa, but you can keep Shatner!

  44. All your Sci-Fi are belong to us by subl33t · · Score: 1

    Next we're gonna take back Shatner!

    (you can keep Celine Dion... please)

    1. Re:All your Sci-Fi are belong to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can keep Shatner!

      Well ... maybe we do need to send him to Canada to finally get rid of him, just keep him off of the show please!

  45. Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Am I the only geek who cares not the least about Star Trek? I absolutely cannot understand what the attraction is.
    WTF is the deal with Dr. Who also?

    Ok..... I am ready to die a horrible death now.

    This isn't flame bait, I do want to hear from other people who feel the same way.

  46. Good to know, but... by grumbel · · Score: 1

    Good to know that Enterprise might have another chance of survival, but on the other side ST:ENT never was that great, it had a bunch of nice episodes, but far to many bad and boring ones, same was already true for Voyager and especially the last TNG movie was just awfull. So unless Enterprise gets significantly better I am really not so sure if bad StarTrek is really better than no StarTrek. Especially the comparism with Star Trek: Hidden Frontier makes ST:ENT and ST:VOY look bad. Hidden Frontier is a fan made series, just a green screen, a bit computer graphics with great 3d models and some make-up, yet they manage to pull off episodes that, while technically limited, are more interesting to watch then most of the average episodes of ST:ENT or Voyager. Which kind of tells about a lot about the official StarTrek stuff that made it to the TV in the last years.

  47. Re:Canucks in space... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calvert du christ, Capitaine! Nous sommes entourés de têtes carrées!

    Mets les boucliers à "on", et tirons leur des torpilles dans les gencives, pis en tabarnak à part de ça!

  48. Computer voice by lildogie · · Score: 1

    The American accent of the computer voice will change.

    'Bout time.

    1. Re:Computer voice by artemis67 · · Score: 1

      I can see it now, replacing Majel Barrett with Doug MacKenzie.

      Picard: Tea, earl grey, hot.
      Computer: Hey, we're out of tea, but how 'bout some back bacon and beer, eh?

      Ryker: Computer, locate Lt. Cmd. Data.
      Computer: Go find him yourself, hoser. Take off, eh!

    2. Re:Computer voice by SunFan · · Score: 1


      Actually, the new Canadian Enterprise will be rather low-budget...they're actually re-branding "Mutants of 2051 AD".

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  49. Canada responsible? by rishistar · · Score: 1

    If the storylines are going to be just as rubbish for this new series I hope they can show they've got a sense of humour by using 'Blame Canada' as the outro theme music.

    In fact, even Celine Dion would be better than the current intro music.

    --
    Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
    1. Re:Canada responsible? by farbles · · Score: 1
      > In fact, even Celine Dion would be better than the current intro music.

      Don't even joke about that. You never know who might be reading this and fail to get it.

    2. Re:Canada responsible? by rishistar · · Score: 1

      >> In fact, even Celine Dion would be better than
      >> the current intro music.

      >Don't even joke about that. You never know who >might be reading this and fail to get it.

      You are right. If I've ever needed to be modded troll before that was it.

      --
      Professor Karmadillo Songs of Science
  50. Space travel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is there to understand? That sort of space travel involves a lot of physics. Astrophysics is most easily done in SI.

    It's not like there are thousands of road signs in space that are marked in miles.

    In addition, you might consider that in the Star Trek universe the U.S. underwent an economic collapse in the late 21st century, or something like this. The *instant* the US isn't the predominant economic force on Earth, you're going to have to switch to Metric to save money. Right now your market is large enough that it's worth creating things in strange sizes to suit you, but that won't last.

    Remember, it's pretty much just you, Burma, and Liberia still on Imperial. The rest of us use the same units. I can go to Australia and the markings on packages will make sense to me.

  51. Losing Bremer.. bermer... whatever... by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    I don't suppose part of the deal is getting rid of that guy everyone hates, is it? (bremer, bermer) Might be a good move if it is. I am tired of plot flaws in the show. The Andorian planet one just about killed me. Yeah, a race of reclusives that you can't get in touch with, but they can call you up on the video phone *rolling eyes*.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  52. Canadian Star Trek actors-How Many? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    How many are they? I only know about three:

    J.D. (Scotty) - the greatest Start Trek actor ever;
    W.S (Kirk) - a bad actor and a jerk;
    Nicole de Boer - adequate acting, it could have been better. Anyway she is the cuttest Star Trek actress ever,and thus everything is forgiven. I would like to see her again in new Trek epiosodes.

    Genevieve Boujold, also a Canadian, would have been a MUCH BETTER Janeway than K.M. but unfortunately she got scared and left the show. I HATED K.M. as Janeway.

    Are there any others?

    1. Re:Canadian Star Trek actors-How Many? by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Genevieve Boujold, also a Canadian, would have been a MUCH BETTER Janeway than K.M. but unfortunately she got scared and left the show."

      I feel safe* in saying that she didn't get scared, she got smart.

      *Having watched almost all of the series (except of course for the beginning and ending episodes which were never carried in my market).

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  53. OMFG! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's JUST a TV show!!!!!!

    Please... everyone backing this... this.... just can't go on! It's... insane!

    I think it's great that people can still be passionate about a cause, but let's make it something that really affects the world we live in! How about something like backing politics that fight against the ridiculously evil things going on now that are attempting to take your freedoms away?

    I know this will be marked as a troll or off-topic or something but I hope before it does, I actually reach someone.

    There's a bunch of people out there that could make a BIG difference if they pull together to make it happen. It's happening now but the cause is a freaking form of entertainment that lines the pockets of people who don't know or care about you in the least. On the other hand, there are causes that could really improve peoples lives.

    Truthfully, are we saying that the effort and resources used to save a TV show should be more significant than those spent in preserving our way of life or making it better? Are we REALLY just a bunch of people who would rather lose our freedoms just so that we can watch a TV show? (Bear in mind that there are plenty of religious fundies who would just LOVE to cancel Star Trek and any SciFi that questions the existance of their god.)

    This is one show... I wish the same effort was put into a cause that actually improves life in the here, now and future. I find it incredulous to witness people caring so little about our government and law and so much about something so trivial.

    1. Re:OMFG! by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! We could fix things and change the world and stuff. We could be like heroes or something!

      Naaaaaaaah, lets go to White Castle, I'm hungry.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    2. Re:OMFG! by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please... everyone backing this... this.... just can't go on! It's... insane!

      Why not. I have to admit, I too question the sanity of these people who are digging deep in their pockets and spending so much time in order to rescue something from the rubbish bin, but I for one encourage them. We all, for the most part, have disposable income which we spend on entertainment, even those who only spend money on blank media.

      I for one don't see this as being a bunch of zelots trying to save their TV show, but rather people who have accepted the fact that they live in a capitilist republic and are using hard core cash in order to get their voices heard rather than simply accepting the arbitrary decision of some executive. After all, we the people are the consumer, it's because of our labor they have jobs in the first place. Albeit trivial, working in common cause is something that we need to be reminded we can do. Sure in the end, it's for a TV show, but it's TV that we pay for in the products we buy. It's our TV show.

      Are we REALLY just a bunch of people who would rather lose our freedoms just so that we can watch a TV show? (Bear in mind that there are plenty of religious fundies who would just LOVE to cancel Star Trek and any SciFi that questions the existance of their god.)

      Hey, if they want to get together and place newspaper ads how SciFi is inspired by the saten to convience people not to believe in God then more power too them. I would think it would be a petty trivial waste of time but we need pepole like this to exercise free speech. Just because I think they are freaking luddite lunitics doesn't mean they have any less rights then I do. Just because I believe what they are doing is a form of censorship doesn't mean I or anyone else has the right to censor them for being idiots.

      This is one show... I wish the same effort was put into a cause that actually improves life in the here, now and future. I find it incredulous to witness people caring so little about our government and law and so much about something so trivial.

      Perhaps people need a TV show that will focus on current issues, social injustice, rather than Paris Hilton milking cows and insulting country folks. While I don't think Enterprise has done the best job of doing this, others would disagree strongly. Good telivision can promote social awareness, and if someone wants to fight for this then more power too them.

      But most importantly, people getting behind a TV show bring people like you out of the woodwork reminding us that we can change the world if we just give it a chance.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  54. Canada eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Captain, they're coming aboot!

  55. Speak Canadian? by BrainSurgeon · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the show will adopt Canada's colorful lingo as well?

    Captain: "Hey you freak'n hoser! I told you to get to your battle stations! We're aboat to me attacked, eh!" Crew: "That's messed up, eh! Can we play hockey afterwards?"

    --
    "It's not rocket science, Smithers! It's only brain surgery!" --Mr. Burns
    1. Re:Speak Canadian? by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      Well, if they bring any new cast on from the Canadian population, they are likely to get some of that Canadian accent. I think Mutant-X has some of them. They say out kinda inbetween "oot" and "oat" and it is freaking annoying.

  56. Obligatory whiny unreasonable fanboy response by mcc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Besides, a lot of U.S. TV shows are produced there. Including an unlikely number of SF shows:

    I feel compelled to point out here that the X-Files didn't begin to suck until after they moved production from Canada to California...

    (To be fair, the first season in california was actally really good. The Sucking did not begin until the *second* California-filmed season. But we can chalk this up to inertia. Canadian inertia.)

  57. PLEASE EXPLAIN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm...?

  58. Vulcan, Alberta, Canada by jakel2k · · Score: 1

    What's this? A chance that Enterprise to be filmed in Vulcan... oh the irony!!! The logic !!! The jokes!!!!

  59. Can't those German guys do it? by csoto · · Score: 1

    You know, the guys who do it out of their dad's basement?

    --
    There exists no way of exchanging information without making judgments. --Bene Gesserit Axiom
  60. Ancient Chinese Provery Say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let Sleeping Dog's Lie..

    And Enterprise Freakin' Die!

    -One Hung Lo.

  61. Teela Brown Syndrome by rewinn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Star Trek franchise has long struggled to escape the Teela Brown syndrome.

    Teela Brown, from Larry Niven's "Known World" series, embodies the concept that after an SF Universe has developed enough really, really keen ideas, authors have trouble coming up with interesting plots. Teela Brown was so effectively bred for Good Luck that nothing really bad could happen to her, which is boring from a plot standpoint (Niven found a great one-time exception to the rule, but that won't work for a series.)

    Original Star Trek: had a great sense of "Anything Can Happen" because no-one really knew what was Out There. And Anything DID happen, which was great for making stories! However, after the Treaty of Organia, the Gaurdian Of Time, the Doomsday Device, and Poor Lazarus jamming the door from alternate universes, it was getting harder and harder to come up with plausible threats. Thank goodness for the Klingons who were just powerful enough to be threatening whenever they were needed!

    ST:TNG wisely ignored the Teela Brown stuff ... for some reason the Organians didn't interfere with the Klingons, Cardassians, Borg, etc.... Creatures who could have been series-killers were given useful limitations, e.g. Q was a joker, the Borg both too far away to bother destroying the Federation in the near future and yet close enough to do it if they felt grouchy, and so on. A nice balance of threats kept open the possibilities.

    ST:DS9 overtly balanced the great powers; in some sense it was all about balancing the various cosmic threats & opportunities for the Federation. And ... most notably ... once the major conflicts were resolved (the Dominion went home and the Wormhole Aliens finished writing their novel) the series ended! There was nothing more to say on the subject, and hopefully we won't get a movie from it.

    ST: Voyager got a balance of problems by throwing the ship far far away from the Federation. Once again Anything Could Happen: Federation technology could be either useless or the perfect McGuffin, whenever it was needed. But once the underlying problem was solved --- the ship got Home --- the series was over, no movies please!

    ST: Enterprise got the only remaining really large era of uncertainty in the ST Universe: the past, prior to the Federation. However, we know how the story arc must end: The Federation is created. That puts a limit on the stories, e.g. the Earth can't really get blown up because someone would just have to re-build it so Kirk can get born there.

    ST: Canada So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

    1. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by MightyMartian · · Score: 1
      I still think the idea of a post-Federation show could be something pretty interesting. It could be just as rough and tough as Enterprise was supposed to have been, but still hold on to the idealism of Roddenberry-era Trek.

      That being said, I still think any new plans should be put on hold and the franchise put into hiatus until some genuine new blood can be found.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      ST: Canada So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      ST: Trailer Park Boys

    3. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by mattbelcher · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ST: Canada So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      I'd like to see ST: Warbird. It would be set on a Romulan ship during the Kirk era and told from their point of view. The Federation would be meddling pricks standing in the way of the mission of spreading civilization to the barbarian hordes.

      --

      Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.

    4. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Section 49 - that would be an interesting series plot. Have a show about the covert happenings of the Federation secret police.

    5. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

      >> So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is
      >>there enough uncertainty to make interesting
      >>plots?

      First of all, must comment on your intelligent and cogent comments - nice analysis.

      Your last question stood out for me and I would answer that good television and/or theater is not about the plot as it is about the characters,

      Look, we *always* know that the main cadre of characters is never going to die off (except in B5 maybe) or even get really badly hurt. We don't really care because we suspend our disbelief for a while if we like the show enough. And what is it about the shows that draws us in?

      I submit that it is he quality of the characters and how much we like/empathize/want to spend some time with them that keeps us coming back.

      Look, everyone *knew* that most of the plotlines in TOS were weak at best - but we didn't care because Spock and his internal struggle intrigued us and we liked the growing friendship between Kirk and Spock. And the love/hate relationship between McCoy and Spock.

      It's the characters that draw us into the show and keep us there - not the plot - because we *always* know that the good guys will pretty much overcome the obstacles by the end of the episode(s) every time.

      And this is why Enterprise fails not because Bacula Blalock are bad actors (they're not)- it's because the writing given to them sucks worse then a Klingon french kiss.

      So, imho, a star trek series (or any other) can flourish indefinaely if you can just make the characters, by way of the writers, interesting and likable enough.

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    6. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      I still think the idea of a post-Federation show could be something pretty interesting

      Yeah, but Roddenberry already did that. It's called Andromeda. He originally wanted what became TNG to be a story about a lone Starfleet ship being thrust into a time where the Federation had ceased to be, but there wasn't much support for the idea as it was too bleak. Sometime before he died, the idea got repurposed a bit to be not Star Trek, and then after his death, his wife took the idea and ran with it, and voila! Andromeda.

      So they can't do that, because a lot of people would just think they were ripping off Andromeda, not getting the irony at all.

    7. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by slriv · · Score: 1

      Excellent comment. Gunsmoke lasted 25 or 26 years and it wasn't because the old-west was really that interesting, it was because Matt Dillon was the man everyone wanted to be, and the character sub-plots and interaction kept you coming back to see if kitty and Matt were ever going to get together and so on.

      I've really enjoyed this years Enterprise or at least some of the more recent episodes because the show is getting back to the basics of ST and moving on from the xindi nonsense and the nightmare that was years 1 and 2 which I still actually enjoyed but weren't on par with Voyager or TNG.

      The fact that Battlestar Galactica has had equal or more viewers during the same timeframe with Enterprise, and that's with stories that aren't nearly as interesting as some of the plots in Enterprise, tells you that the characters are the key.

      Bacula and Blalok are great. I like all the enterprise characters but they have almost no depth and that's simply bad writing.

      This is going to sound shallow and it's also been pounded into the ground time and time again, but seriously the theme song really sets the tone for the whole show. 99.9% of the time I try to fast forward through it so I don't get discouraged and go watch an infomercial or something. I guess if I could alter the show, I would dump the theme and resurrect the original ST theme. I would also try to work on the characters. Get them into something that we can relate to better.

      --
      All the worlds a stage, and I'm the guy running the lights...
    8. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by slriv · · Score: 1

      I would rather see a ST based in the mirror universe where everyone has beards and kills each other for power (more like the real world we live in).

      --
      All the worlds a stage, and I'm the guy running the lights...
    9. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      >>
      Look, everyone *knew* that most of the plotlines in TOS were weak at best - but we didn't care because Spock and his internal struggle intrigued us and we liked the growing friendship between Kirk and Spock. And the love/hate relationship between McCoy and Spock.

      Come on. Only some of the stories were bad. Most Trek episodes were very well written. It's true that even on the bad episodes, the likeable characters transcend the bad writing. But the post TOS shows had a far worse record in the plot dept. than TOS.

    10. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ST: Trailer Park Boys

      That's already been done as gay slashfic.

    11. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bacula and Blalok are great.

      Blacula rules!

      Oh, BACULA. Not so cool.

    12. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by master_p · · Score: 1

      So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      how about travelling to another galaxy? or an intergalactic war? or a very powerful enemy bent on conquering Earth? how about an actual all-out confrontation with Klingons? how about the Sun becoming a supernova when an alien deadly beam ignites it and the Enterprise goes out on a voyage to discover a new Earth?

      here is another scenario. A scientist finds on Earth an ancient scroll which shows the origins of man in space: a planet in a distant galaxy. The Enterprise goes on a mission to find that planet.

    13. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      The distant future? One derailed in such a way that the time-hopping interferonauts never emerge. I wouldn't say no to a future Milky Way crushed under the nanofoot of the New Borg.

      The distant past? Say, 30,000 Years Before Zephram. That predates nearly all the main Alpha/Beta civilizations we're familiar with, but what about the corporeal Q and all those others who moved on by Kirk's time?

      The Mirror Universe? Take a bunch of Fed civies and fling them into the middle of it all.

      Break the mould; set it in a colony instead of space? Follow Federation citizens, instead of Fleet?

      The Trek universe is not finished, it's just a matter of finding new perspective and executing it with integrity. I know, I know: television. We can hope.

    14. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about travelling to another galaxy?

      There was that TNG episode with The Traveller...

      or an intergalactic war?

      DS9 and the Dominion...

      or a very powerful enemy bent on conquering Earth?

      Star Trek: First Contact

      how about an actual all-out confrontation with Klingons?

      That episode of the original series with the Organians...

      how about the Sun becoming a supernova when an alien deadly beam ignites it

      Star Trek: Generations...

      and the Enterprise goes out on a voyage to discover a new Earth?

      Because Rick Berman would have the Enterprise crew discover a way to repair the damage done to the sun by using an inverted polaron beam with a heavy salting of chronitons. Either that, or it'll be like the time they hid from a Borg Cube using a tricorder...

      here is another scenario. A scientist finds on Earth an ancient scroll which shows the origins of man in space: a planet in a distant galaxy. The Enterprise goes on a mission to find that planet.

      TNG: The Chase.

    15. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ### So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      There are multiple direction that could be taken:

      - explore another galaxy, so far StarTrek only took place in our own

      - show the life of some colonist or some other part of the StarTrek that isn't the flagship of the fleet, show more of what the common man does

      - make a series similar to OuterLimits, but in a StarTrek universe, ie. don't let the whole series play on a single ship, but let it take place where the interesting stuff happens

      - make war against some random new bad guy, join with some old enemies (romulans or so) to stand a chance

      - have a the show take place from a non human viewpoint, ie. klingon, romulan or the like

      There are still lots of directions that could be taken, StarTrek is after all a whole universe, not just a single starship or spacestation. If all fails they could always just continue with crazy stuff on the holodeck.

    16. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      The Star Trek franchise has long struggled to escape the Teela Brown syndrome.

      *Very* nice. I'm stealing that one.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    17. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      I would like to see them explore the 29th Century Federation, which was alluded to in the third season Voyager two-part episode "Future's End" in which the Federation sends small one man ships to any point in the galaxy at any time: past, present, or future using space folding technology.

    18. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by master_p · · Score: 1

      You're right, it has been done before. But I am talking about a quest, a mission, not an 1-hour episode! a whole series that takes 1 year and that expands on the characters, has many subplots and grand revelations at the end (and a few tragic love stories). What Star Trek needs is an actual plot. In other words, it is the format that is wrong, not the content.

    19. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by rewinn · · Score: 1

      good television and/or theater is not about the plot as it is about the characters

      Thank you for your kind words!

      And I must agree with your point about the superiority of character over plot, as well as my own directly contradictory point. If that introduces a universe-threatening paradox, perhaps it can be sorted out in the initial episode of Star Trek: Epistomologist.

      As a callow youth and a continuing SF devotee, I enjoyed a *lot* of puzzle-SF, so to me the first requirement of the genre (... as perhaps also of detective fiction ...) seems to be a setting in which interesting things happen easily. Thereafter, it is still the writer's job to create interesting characters, without which the whole universe is wasted. While it is still *possible* to write interesting stories in any of the ST sub-universes, it seems difficult to invent new ones that don't contradict prior tenets of the series, and yet aren't just copies of the old. For example, a series about another ship exploring another galaxy would be just a variation on the TOS.

      And yet ... for the sake of audiences outside the limited numbers of puzzle-geeks ... even on a blank stage, great characters with interesting relationships can make a story that people will pay good money to see, decade after decade, e.g. Satre's "No Exit". Is the problem in TV/SF that most writers have only a few top works in them, and the really prolific top writers don't want to tie themselves down to many scripts?

      I modestly propose the next ST universe: Star Trek: Guest Writer, which consists entirely of stories by top writers, writing about any character in any situation, anywhere and anywhen in the ST universe, e.g. Stephen King, Maya Angelou, Tom Clancy, Jon Stewart. This would be an expensive undertaking, but truly great!

    20. Re:Teela Brown Syndrome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ST: Canada So what is left? Where in the ST Universe is there enough uncertainty to make interesting plots?

      Uncertainly: Will the Captain of the Enterprise change from being a water polo fan into a hockey fan? Maybe we'll find out how the hockey strike ends with a historical reference.

  62. Why? by TempusMagus · · Score: 1

    I simply don't understand the zealotry here. If this was a good show (which it is not by almost every barometer of taste) then I could understand it. Why arent they trying to save the franchise rather than the show? Wouldnt it make more sense to say "Hey, give US a better new show" rather than "save the show that no one watched". WIth BSG having the raised the bar so high - I find this all very hard to understand.

    --
    -_-
  63. And they are happy until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... they are issued their red uniforms.

  64. Trekkies by radarsat1 · · Score: 1

    Has anyone seen the movie 'Trekkies'? Do you realize how crazy people are about this show? I mean... wow.

  65. how much sci-fi is local? by phorm · · Score: 1

    If a large portion of it has for quite awhile been filmed out-of-country, wouldn't that mean it isn't so much being outsourced as just not insourced?

  66. STRCMP: The Mountie Generation by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    As we join the Royal Canadian Multi-stellar Police in their voyages across the Galaxy, we can remember they always get their lifeform ...

    At least they won't be censored like the US show was in showing Romulan Ale and other such things that scare the beejabbers out of the faint of heart Yanks ... and they'll have more women on the crew too.

    Not sure if I'm looking forward to all the filming of snow planets though, in search of a viable Hockey franchise ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  67. Maybe they can get Canadian Shatner by Darth23 · · Score: 1
    to do a guest spot.

    Don't Canadian productions get tax breaks for having Canadian actors in their productions?

    --

    -------- In Soviet Russia, "Soviet Russia" sigs hate Slashdot.

  68. Now we can look forward to hot Canadian babes by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Just like the casting of that other Canadian-produced show, Battlestar Galactica.

    Oh, knock me over and feed me donuts and 7 percent hard cider in litre bottles.

    Make it so, eh?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  69. Re:Star Trek has too many white people (Part 2) by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2

    I'm not a Star Trek expert or anything. But wasn't there something called the eugenics wars in the Star Trek timeline?

    That might have something to do with the no certain ethnicities.

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  70. Let it die by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    For the sake of all that is decent and vaguely interesting, let this pile of shit die. The series was bad, worse than Voyager (which I didn't actually think was possible).

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  71. To boldly go... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 1

    ...where no Canuck has gone before, eh?

    --
    I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  72. Don't worry, Canada's got it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    For all of you Star Trek fans, don't worry. Canada's version, Start Trek: Degrassi, will be of excellent production quality. It will offer a moral lesson in every episode. New topics will be introduced that have never been seen before in a Star Trek series, such as teen pregnancy and drug use.

    Since it'll air on CBC, profitablity won't be an issue because it is government supported. Best of all, it'll never get cancelled -- no matter how uninterested viewers are!

  73. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by davidsyes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to like the US production of Airwolf, a former Bellasarius production. It died in the US market, losing Jan Michael Vincent, Ernest Borgnine and a few other characters, but was resurrected in Canada. Having watched Airwolf since about 1983 or 1984, I was surprised when in 1988 in Bahrain at the Admin Support Unit lounge and saw Airwolf on TV. But, I was initially dismayed at the glassy-screen-like camera treatment and the character changes. But, actually, I ended up liking it a bit later, despite it moving up north and using different formatting/ratios. One thing I did later liked was that the cinematography was different: The camera angles and movements and even focal length seemed un-US-like. I like it. The show then seemed "quicker" and "grittier" in some aspects.

    However, many US Trek fans and unions will probably bitch like hell at the move. If it can be moved to Canada, some will reason, then why can't the costs be brought down, and it kept here in the US. Well, maybe the Canadian studios do the same or better work for slightly less up-front cost. I dunno, but for a production to leave the US and go to another country, SOMEthing is being saved. Or, someone else wants the cachet of having Trek or (name your show) on their notched belt.

    Heck, even the Simpsons show has most of if not all of its artwork and animation done in South Korea. It costs a fraction of what it would in the US, and the Korean team is doing a great job, it seems.

    To the dismay of a number of Trek fans, and maybe even the cast, as with Airwolf, some or all of the cast and characters might change. I wouldn't be surprised if some elites or idealists in Canada tweak Enterprise to be more CanaPrize, making Star Trek's vision of the future include MORE of the real world, instead of Hollywood's US-market-centric/pleasing view of the world.

    For example:

    Voyager had Harry Kim, cuz "we gotta please the economically powerful and politically savvy Asian community..." yet while Tom Paris was a misfit inmate who caused the death of Starfleet personnel, he was eventually promoted to Lieutenant on Voyager, the ship, not just the show. Clean-nosed, sometimes defiant Harry Kim? Oh, he's done what NO ensign wants to do/be: Remain ensign for SEVEN YEARS on the same ship. His not receiving a field promotion by Janeway was NOT a Federation/UFP/Starfleet issue. I DARE say it was a US-centric, hollywood "thing" about keeping Garret Wang's character "down". (No, Kim's being promoed AFTER Voyager destroyed/set back the Borg does NOT count, since his promotion was a cheesy-assed future-scene, not part of Voyagers' Fans chronology...)

    Of course, that example won't fly when compared to DS9, since women were elevated, but aside from Cassidy Yates, most were not real-life ethnic minorities.

    As for Enterprise, Mayweather seems to gleefully smile at the console, from most of the episodes I've seen. It is true he and Hoshi had their little moments, one of Hoshi's being to copulate with an alien and "exchange some language"...

    I hope the Canadians take Trek where it's never been before: GLOBAL!

    It would be nice to see an Indian in a turbin on duty, in uniform. It would be NICE to see a Black/Asian couple aboard ship, instead of the all-too-beaten/submission-forced Anglo/Sino pairings. It would be nice to see an Iraqi, or Greek, or person from Tuvalu or Vunuato and identified as such, on the ship. It would be nice to see crew members in their off-duty, and NOT just the main ensemble.

    In Canada's hands, after about a year of some close-minded segment of the audience kvetching, Trek could TRULY improve, for instance, diving into details of a new and improved UN Security Council's fictional but pivotal role in rescuing the world from one-country-control, despite global markets theoretically dictating that one country cannot control the world.

    Yeh, up to this point, Trek has been a franchise of US origin, and it is a venture/business driven by demographics. Well, it's time for WORLD demo

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  74. Actually. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I hope that Canada does pick up Enterprise. The latter seasons were like sunshine compared to the previous, "Torture is Okay," seasons.

    Canada is still in the process of choosing and defining what part it will play in the new world order. If the U.S. rejects an anti-government message which can find support in Canada, then this says something.

    Metaphor is powerful.


    -FL

  75. I think Captain Pike said it best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    BEEP BEEP

  76. Re:Star Trek has too many white people (Part 2) by mark-t · · Score: 1
    When Gene Roddenberry created the original series, he attempted to make the series as inclusive as possible. The TOS included characters such as Uhura (black African, NOT African-American), Sulu (Asian, not Asian-American), Chekov (Russian), and many other diverse characters.
    Not to be pedantic (okay, that's a lie. This *IS* to be pedantic) ... But Sulu was born in San Fransisco, according to Star Trek IV, The Voyage Home.
  77. Planet Gretzky? by nightsweat · · Score: 1

    "Captain, the Lemieux field is collapsing!"

    --

    the major advances in civilization are processes which all but wreck the societies in which they occur - A.N. White
  78. I'm proud to be Canadian... by ccharles · · Score: 1

    I'm proud to be Canadian, and this would be kinda cool. I just hope that we don't start backing every stupid idea that comes out of the francise...

  79. Why is this show worth saving? by borg1238 · · Score: 1

    Please explain why this show is worth saving, compared to such shows as Battlestar Galactica, Farscape, and Firefly?

    I'm serious. I've watched it over the last four years, and I've never seen anything more than derivative and hackneyed story telling.

    This franchise is like having a sick relative, that finally dies, but instead of burying him, you prop up the corpse on the couch and everyone pretends nothing's wrong.

    1. Re:Why is this show worth saving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This franchise is like having a sick relative, that finally dies, but instead of burying him, you prop up the corpse on the couch and everyone pretends nothing's wrong.

      Sounds like the plot for ST: Weekend at Bernie's.

  80. Mod this guy up. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    Thanks now I'll never get that song out of my head.
    I need to go shoot up a post office now. Make the music stop. Make it stop. AAAUUUGGGGHHH!!!!

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  81. I for one... by MImeKillEr · · Score: 1

    ..would love to see a mix of 'Enterprise' and SCTV's 'Bob & Doug McKenzie' (Hey! They're puttin' some out on DVD!).

    'The Great White North' and 'Farm Film Report' were probably the only funny things on SCTV.

    Ahhh. Funny Canadians.

    Take off, hosers.

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
  82. KHAAAAANNNNADIAN!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Eh?

  83. Re:Too many questions... Airwolf moved, but by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    the cast changed. There were occasional if fleeting references to String(fellow Hawk) and his bother, St.John ("sin-juhn") began flying the Airwolf.

    It might be interesting, tho, as I pointed out in another commentary in this thread, to have multiple ships of the Enterprise type doing a combinatiof Voyager/BattleStar Galactica, except a bunch of UFP/Vulcan and other scientists would be moved to some "expanse" to set up the (Vulcan-feared) human manifest destiny type of outposts.

    Then multiple ships and crews could be filmed. Logistically and politically, though, actors, their unions and reps might balk at the division/reduction of pay from doubling or tripling the sets and payroll.

    They COULD try something like "UFO" (den-den-den-den deh-det-det-deh-deh-dett-deh-deh, deew-dee-deww deww, ....)

    http://www.answers.com/main/ntquery;jsessionid=e 56 0cb1a2pa35?method=4&dsid=2222&dekey=UFO+%28TV+seri es%29&gwp=8&curtab=2222_1&sbid=lc03a

    And have aliens trying to interfere with things. But the main thing to learn from UFO is that it's OK to rotate cast and characters around, sort of like on real ships, despite the need to bring new reports up to speed. Or, they should just cover crew members lives and duties, not just fixate on 5 or 7 people with many moons between "a day in the life of a vital crewmember below decks..."

    Then, again, they could always go out looking for Gracie's grandparents... and seek to relocate some "wolphins"...

    http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/2005 04 15/ap_on_sc/wholphin_birth

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  84. "Are you from Canada?" by RobertKozak · · Score: 1


    Archer: "I'm from New York. I only work in Canada."

    --
    Bet this .sig looks familiar.
  85. Spoilers please? by BTWR · · Score: 1
    I watched the first 2 seasons, then I got bored with it (seems a shame, since every time there's an Enterprise thread, people seem to say that Season 4 is great, even so much to say as it's the best trek since TNG).

    Anyway, I was wondering if they did ever resolve that whole "Futureman/Temperal Time Cold War" thing.

    Who was futureman?

    So in the end, what was the whole war about?

    Did that crewman on the Enterprise (forget his name, but he was from the 29th century and they sealed off his quarters) have anything to do with it?

    Did you like how it resolved?

    1. Re:Spoilers please? by Maserati · · Score: 1

      1. Some weird alien dictator guy from the future.
      2. Rival factions battling for control of the timeline.
      3. Daniels. yes.
      4. Season 4 started with the 2nd part of the last time-travel episode. P-51s firing machine guns at a shuttlepod are cool. Reptillian aliens in Nazi uniforms made me turn the S.4 premier off before the theme music started. So that's a 'no'.

      However, after that they did manage to introduce a rogue Starfleet element that looks a lot like Section 31, explain why some Klingons have smooth foreheads (probably the best work they did on Enterprise), show how interspecies cooperation started and even managed to get the Vulcan's back on track (and explained why they've been such utter dicks, no the ambassador is NOT a Romulan - killing a theory I've had since the show first aired). The Dr. Sung episodes were interesting (and Brent Spiner needed the work). We get to see Romulans being devious. And Jeffrey Coombs gets a lot of work in Season 4, that's ALWAYS good.

      Season 4 is definitely worth the download. If this hypothetical Season 5 continues using 2- and 3-part stories I'm all for it.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    2. Re:Spoilers please? by BTWR · · Score: 1

      thanks. i appreciated that summary.

  86. MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    makes no sense

    also latin should be auto modded down since its a dead language and people that use it just want to sound intelligent (which they might if anyone actually understood them)(but thye dont)

    1. Re:MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you're an uneducated fool who can't see the joke doesn't mean everybody else is the same.

    2. Re:MOD DOWN by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      Could not have POSSIBLY said it better myself. Thanks, amigo.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    3. Re:MOD DOWN by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 1

      Love your spelling. Is "Thye" Middle English? Oh, wait, you're too smart for non-ghetto tongues. Sorry.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    4. Re:MOD DOWN by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "also latin should be auto modded down since its a dead language"

      I propose that Perl posts be automatically modded down for the same reason!

  87. For the love of God (and good Sci-Fi!)... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just let it DIE!!!

  88. Shitner more like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You *are* aware that every time you remind someone that William Shatner is Canadian, their opinion of the country halves?

    1. Re:Shitner more like... by ari_j · · Score: 1

      It's a slow war, but we'll win it yet!

  89. Re:Star Trek has too many white people (Part 2) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right, I forgot. But does he even act like he is from San Francisco? He acts more like a recent Chinese/Japanese immigrant to San Francisco which is still similar to a native Chinese/Japanese in China/Japan.

  90. Smallville by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

    Smallville, I belive, is filmed just outside of Vancouver BC. That's why Kansas looks like it has more forest than prairie.

  91. I remember those days... by hondo77 · · Score: 1

    Jeebus, to have that sort of spare time again...

    --
    I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  92. WHY??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why so much effort to save a half-assed series that violates official Star Trek canon at every damned step? Enterprise is GARBAGE.

    If there is any passion for the series at all it should be for something worthy of the cause: Enterprise is NOT. How about the Starfleet Academy show? That would be worth it. How about post-fall-of-the-Federation? That has HUGE possibilities. Enterprise? Give me a break.

  93. Wasn't it canceled, though? by Bongo+Bill · · Score: 1

    Would it kill Paramount to just make up their minds?

    --
    ...but is it art?
  94. Pythonesque by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    Gahh

    Dead collector: Bring out your dead!
    Trek Fans: Here's one.
    Collector: Ninepence
    Enterprise: I'm not dead!
    Collector: What?
    Trek Fans: Nothing. Here's your ninepence
    Enterprise: I'm not dead!
    Collector: Here. He says he's not dead.
    Trek Fans: Yes he is.
    Enterprise: No I'm not!
    Collector: He isn't?
    Trek Fans: Well he will be soon. He's very ill.
    Enterprise: I'm getting better!
    Trek Fans: No you're not. You'll be stone dead in a moment.
    Collector: Look, I can't take him like that. It's against regulations.
    Enterprise: I don't want to go on the cart!
    Trek Fans: Oh don't be such a baby.
    Collector: I can't take him.
    Enterprise: I feel fine!
    Trek Fans: Oh, do us a favor?
    Collector: I can't.
    Trek FansWell can you make it around in a couple of minutes? He won't be long.
    Collector: No... I've got to go to the Robinsons. They've lost nine today.
    Trek Fans: Well when's your next round?
    Collector: Thursday.
    Enterprise: I think I'll go for a walk.
    Trek Fans: You're not foolin' anyone, you know. Look. Isn't there something you can do?
    Enterprise: I feel happy! I feel Happy!
    (Sound of trekunited being hit in the head with a large club)
    Trek Fans: Oh, thanks very much.
    Collector: Not at all. See you on Thursday.
    Trek Fans: Right.

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  95. Let it fucking die already! by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    Look you pointy eared freaks, Star Trek NEEDS TO DIE!
    What's the point? After TNG, there was nothing left.
    DS9 was soap opera drivel and Let me not even start on Voyager.
    Enterprise - hahahaha I stopped wathing that the second season when I was disgusted by the complete lack of continuity that all the other series had worked hard to maintain and that it was obviously going to be one time travel episode after the next. Personally, I think Berman purposefully planned to give the entire Star Trek Franchise a complete and utter assfucking with Enterprise. And that he did.

    So hey -- put away the terry cloth Kirk Uniform, stop speaking Klingon, stop throwing conventions and maybe just maybe in 20+years, someone else can pick it up and maybe it'll be cool again.

  96. Does nobody remember Airwolf? by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 1

    This is starting to remind me of when Airwolf was cancelled and picked up by a canadian network. It didn't last another season.
    I'd hate to see all this effort go to waste.

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  97. Yes! The saliva-string french kiss between Hoshi and T'Pol might yet happen!

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  98. what needs to be done.... by Danathar · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The reason why the whole Star Trek universe (besides Enterprise) was fairly successfull was due to the fact that the Star Trek Universe was re-imagined 75 years into the future. The difference was fresh and COMPLETELY different from the old series.

    I think they should do it again...jump into the future...but this time, don't jump 75 years...jump 750 years! or maybe even a couple thousand years!

    It would give the writers the latitude to imagine how the federation (and the Star Trek Universe) would evolve far into the future and create some REALLY interesting storylines.

  99. Leo Laporte by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    The new "Call for Help" is produced in Toronto. It's not as flashy/blinky as the old one and Americans can't get it.

  100. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    > It would be nice to see an Indian in a turbin on duty, in
    > uniform.

    Not likely. Not likely at all.

    Almost anytime you see someone wearing a turban, it's not necessarily just an "indian", but specifically a practitioner of the sikh faith. It's not an ethnic or regional thing. It's a religious thing. Not cutting their hair, and covering it with the turban in public "brings them closer to god" or somesuch.

    And, if you'll remember, one part of Gene Roddenberry's vision of humanity's future was that, by the time of Star Trek, we'd have progressed beyond such superstitious nonsense. You'll note that various other religious headgear (Jewish skullcaps, muslim veils, and so on) was also notably absent from the Enterprise. And if you'll recall old-school internet discussion, one of the reasons that DS9 left a sour taste in the mouths of some fans of TOS and TNG is that DS9 regressed Star Trek in this regard, and that Berman and his goons filled DS9 with an absolutely tedious amount of pseudo-religious claptrap.

    For that matter, even by present day, we were supposed to have gotten past SOME of said BS. In Space Seed, Lt. McGivers mentions that Khan was a sikh. And you'll note that Khan, a 1990's contemporary, was not particularly inclined to wear a turban himself.

    So, no, if future incarnations of Star Trek make even a token effort at staying true to Gene's vision... no turbans on the Enterprise.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  101. Re:Star Trek has too many white people (Part 2) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are you even remotely interested in having future Star Trek franchises conform closely to Roddenberry's vision of a Star Trek world with human diversity that closely tracks the diversity in today's and tomorrow's Earth??


    Ahem... NO. Now take your whiney political correctness and leave, before a big mean white guy wearing a red shirt sporting a southern US accent shows you the brig.
  102. Shatner-the worst Star Trek actor ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada should be ashamed of Shatner and proud of J.D. (Scotty)

    Shatner is a Canadian Jew, Jewish people should be also ashamed of Shatner and proud of Nimoy,the best Jewish Star Trek actor ever.

    Long live Spock and prosper!

  103. Dr. Who too by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    While not filmed there, the CBC is involved in the new Dr. Who as well. Up next, Dr. Who visits Whoville!

  104. More facial hair, dead give away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're men in Canada, they're the ones that don't trim their beards.

  105. Re:T. Brown Syndrome; minor tribble ..er.. Quibble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...from Larry Niven's "Known World" series..." I believe Niven's universe was/is called "Known Space".

  106. Do you own by benb · · Score: 1

    If you have money on your hands, and the talents of many hobby writers, and maybe some very good student actors, why not roll your own series, driven by fans?

    It obviously couldn't be called "Star Trek" or "Enterprise". There probably wouldn't be a "Star Fleet Command" either, but it could have the spirit of Star Trek, and maybe a universe loosy leaning on Star Trek's, but not a clone. Surely there are areas where the universe could be much better, e.g. more fined-grained politics, economics etc.. Star Trek often simplifies questions too much for my taste - in the universe, in the doctrines and the stories.

    But it should keep the spirit of Star Trek: Scientific. An optimistic projection of the future. Pointing out social dilemmas, teaching good moral values (mostly). It could use more personalty-building insights. And more hints where to look for more background on certain questions.

    As for concrete organisation, even with 3 millions you don't get far with traditional production, so it would have to rely a lot on hobbyists and university students. I think there is a lot of talent that is unused, it could be the student excerzise in many areas, but obviously writing, acting, camera, cut. Maybe you'll also find volunteers to help with the scenery, both design and building. A critical part will be the decision making process, to avoid long discussions, quarrels and splits. I guess a reasonable goverance/management will be best to drive things forward and avoid long internal discussions.
    I guess the money would have to be spent on the materials alone, and it might not even be enough for that.

  107. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by Jardine · · Score: 1

    I hope the Canadians take Trek where it's never been before: GLOBAL!

    Damn I hope not. Global is notorious for showing part of a season of a good show and then never showing the rest. They seem to love buying up the rights to Sci-Fi shows and sticking them in shitty timeslots if they air them at all.

    Oh. You weren't talking about the TV network. Never mind.

  108. Seriously, Why is it cheaper? by kb9vcr · · Score: 1

    Why is it cheaper to produce shows in Canada? Does anyone know for sure?

  109. Paramount would like2releasemy DEEP SPACE ENGINE?! by newpath4comVersion2 · · Score: 1
    Maybe Paramount would like 2 release my DEEP SPACE ENGINE?! Wow, who would have EVER thought of that?! I'll take a low price with a percentage of the movie just like everyone else, and it's a DONE DEAL...
    • In fact, I'm sure it would work once all my SlashDot friends got behind me. Heck,
    • I'll just open up my little DreamWeaverMX in a few minutes & slash hell out of that
    • ridiculous $360,000,000.00 (million) Price Tag I put on there to wake everyone up!
    • Yeah. hehehe WHAT A HOOT;
    • my engine saving Star Trek Enterprise from
    • GALACTIC DESTRUCTION AT THE HANDS OF THE EVIL DR. DARTH-PARAMOUNT.
    • I won't even ask for a part in the movie like some
    • Money-Grubbing, Fame-chasing inventors would.
    • I'm not Alfred Hitchcock.
  110. You Stole Shatner by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

    You guys stole Shatner, now were taking the whole frikken show!

    MUHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  111. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Now, maybe I'm going to be the "boy that cried wolf", but ...

    It's all to easy for "hollywierd" to pay lip service to a religion, a race, or somesuch, but it's also ALL to easy for them to dive into ALIEN religion practices because they're "off-world", not here in Iraq, Jerusalem, Ireland, or some reservation on North Dakota. Chakotay is a notable exception, but aside from him and Robert Beltran, it's hard for me to recall when Hollywood showed some balls in some of these aspects.

    It's one thing for Marla McGivers/Gyvers to "refer" to Khan as "Sikh", and another for the studio (particularly in the 60's) to dress him/costume him and show him kneeling and praying, so instead, to possibly distract us, he's doing isometrics, summoning his powers borne by genetics.

    But, humans being humans, particularly those in wealth and who care more about accumulating maldistributed wealth, in TODAY's world, we will not, except in theme-based productions, see a lot of Trek showing real-life religions, a Travis/Hoshi pairing, and so on. In REAL LIFE, I've met a number of Black/Asian pairings, and yet Star Trek, scurrying into a comfort zone, couldn't even recognize that.

    There comes a time when scripts have to show reality, even in fiction, and not just cozily kiss ass for some market or demographic numbers. Many of today's youth tend to be more worldly (cuz mommy and daddy or even their own governments can send them abroad on student exchange programs, thankfully) and accepting (thanks to no major xenophobia and thanks to the US having bombed so many of the wrong targets in South East Asia that in atonement, not out of some superior/ideological-mindedness, it HAD to take in hundreds of thousands of emigrants-- I know, I have PLENTY of Asian friends whose homes were bombed or who have relatives who were bombed and weren't even the so-called designated targets...) that hopefully it will be just a matter of time until some remnants still in charge just "go away".

    Final race-tone example: I recently watched a recent production of high school economics class students on KTEH/54. I was saddened that from the 30 minutes or so that I watched, the camera gave plenty of background face time to the non-African American and non-Asian students. The camera just dwelled on them for long enough to tell their opinion, but when the camera moved past them, it moved fairly FAST. For the non-minorities, fore- OR background, the camera was in nor hurry to pan/scan/zoom. That, my friend, exemplifies that if it's not a minority-produced show (forced in some ways to retaliate, or kiss up to upstage the mainstream productions not center staging a Denzel), the camera moves fast and the dialog is short.

    We need to do something about it here, otherwise US minorities going overseas will CONTINUE to be shunned, ignored, or presumed to be drug dealers, non-contributors and the like, other than in music, sports, or a few niche areas.

    I dislike having said this, to some extent, but it has to be said. Trek is ideal, and idealistic, but it ultimately will follow the money trail more than the Ideal Trail. That's PROBABLY why Berman (I believe it was him) or others dismissed DS9 as being "not really part of the Franchise..." Probably because Avery Brooks was in charge, a few women (Keiko, Neris, Jadzia and her lively-feisty-dilithium-powered-Worf-mounting replacement (interestingly, also Canadian), Cassidy, and a few I can't recall) almost outnumbered and out-ranked or out-brained some of the men. Ultimately, Sisko was "vaporized" into an "Emissary", pretty much removing him from corporeal status, and possibly killing off ANY decent theatrical presentation of DS9.

    (Pops 10 vials of lithium...)

    David Syes
    But, as I said before, this is present-day Earth.

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  112. No. by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Now move along.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  113. Re:T. Brown Syndrome; minor tribble ..er.. Quibble by rewinn · · Score: 1

    "...from Larry Niven's "Known World" series..." I believe Niven's universe was/is called "Known Space".

    Ooops, thanks; I just mixed up SF and SCA ... they are stored in overlapping brain cells

  114. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
    And, if you'll remember, one part of Gene Roddenberry's vision of humanity's future was that, by the time of Star Trek, we'd have progressed beyond such superstitious nonsense.

    Religion played a role in several TOS episodes.

    We had the "Son-worshipers" on the paralell Earth with a 20th-century Rome, in which ep McCoy states "we represent many different faiths".

    The M5 computer essentially commits suicide after coming to believe that murder is "against the laws of man and god".

    The Vulcans seem awefully Zen-like with their robes and their meditation. (Of course people argue whether Zen is a religion or not.)

    The asteroid world Yonada was ruled by a priestess

    And we had space hippies searching for Eden.

    --
    Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
    You cannot wash away blood with blood
  115. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? 60's by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    Sun God:

    In Bread and Circuses, the "God" Flavius Maximus and Septimus and others believed in or feared suited the religious powers that be. It purports that the God of Earth Humans is pervasive, enduring, and omnipresent such that even aliens of another world would value it/him/her just as supposedly "most" judeo-christians do or claim to.

    M-5:

    M-5, technologically-- and logically-- in that case, HAD to do itself in. After all, Daystrom imprinted his OWN belief system, his "memory engrams" onto M--5's core programming. That is why M-5 stated, after bullying queries by Kirk, "... murder is contrary to the laws of God and Man..." That is why when Kirk asked M-5, "And what is the punishment for murder", M-5 replied "This... unit... must... DIE", upon which time we get the dramatic "dew-dew-dew--doo-doo" sound piece. Then, of course, Shatner's lines--probably added by himself-- were "Scotty! Get to Engineering. Pull the PLUG. Pull the plug FAST!"

    Planet Vulcan:

    Since Spock's Pon Farr and other mystical or cultural issues or attributes were alluded to or partially seen in prior episodes or would have been discussed (since Nimoy and his character were principal pieces of TOS), it was obligatory to show off-worlder "mysticism". Again, as I mentioned in one of my prior follow-ups, it is NOT too terribly easy for Paramount and Trek to deal with HUMAN characters' religious mores that are parallel to our own. It's easy for them to have Sisko and Picard and Janeway IMPOSE upon or graft on to an issue or species their "script-edited" value, but as for the characters' day-to-day internal issues with God, humanity, manifest destiny, exploration and, it's only tossed in as a dramatic device, not as a tool to spend more than 15 seconds per episode with...

    Yonada/Kalandrans?:

    Diana Princess' homeland was ruled by women, and I believe a few Johnny Weismueller/Tarzan episodes tackled the issue of women. As long as it's not an episodic, 3 or 4 times per season (unless they're scantily-clad and escaping the body-parts censors), the studios and audience and elites won't complain, at least not too much...

    "Stehhp-pin' ennn-to Eeden, Yah... Bwudder"

    "No more trouble in my body or my mind...eat all the fruit and throw away the vine" surely harkens to Adam and Eve. But, hippies of the episode were an academy dropout, a son of an elitist, a few misfits, and otherss capable of acquiring a space vessel to escape a disillusioning existence among their other fellow humans. Even today, if there were a place to which escape were possible and yet far enough away to not be subject to the laws of their various countries, people would take the chance. Hell if I could find an unclaimed island and had resources, I'd set up a minimal government (set up as an entity under protection of a number of countries in and outside of the UN, ASEAN, SEATO, African Union, European Union, Asian Union, and others, JUST to show the US "it AINT gonna get every fricking thing it wants..."), an idealist/idyllic environment, and even build up a navy and DARE the US government to impose it's black-ships ports visits upon me. But, we KNOW how long my little idyllic plateau would last before being nuked, bombed, or shaved down a few dozen feet.

    ---- Further/deeper...
    Censors of the 60's were "ignorant" when it came to ST:TOS. Until Trek (and even a bit after Trek), despite a number of ground-breaking Sci-Fi films/movies and TV features (Twilight Zone, The Outer Limits, Night Gallery--if that can be included), some of these issues of metaphysical and religious value were not noticed. Because Trek was sci-fi, it apparently was not dreamed that religion, racism, class culture, elitism and so on could slip past the censors. Though the censors and some studio execs zeroed in on Spock's "devilish" ears, they particularly missed the anti-Vietnam sentiments, or did a good enough job pretending to not catch and cenor the anti-war statements/messages. ("Balance of Terror", "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  116. Can I point out one tiny thing? ... by danalien · · Score: 1
    What you say, makes sense, yes, no doubt.

    But, you forget, that you can't crowd everything toward something.

    Think of it like this, you can't move/have everyone live along the equator ... - you got to let ppl spread/live where they want to live ....

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  117. Re:Canada Anybody Remember Airwolf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummmm where has all this info about production coming up here to Canada? For all intents and purposes, it is a wrap on the series. They say on the website that there is nothing planned at present. http://www.detnews.com/2005/screens/0504/16/scree- 152160.htm

  118. Re:Star Trek has too many white people (Part 2) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too true. I would assume that his parents were recent immigrants, and he was, in fact, born there.

  119. Vancouver? by xpyr · · Score: 1

    Ooh if they decide to do the filming in Vancouver, that be sweet :D I'll be on the look out for the set then and the actors. I might even see T'pal then. That be even more sweet :D