Slashdot Mirror


BountyQuest CEO Patenting Lighting Toilet Water

theodp writes "Charles Cella, CEO of the widely-hyped Jeff Bezos and Tim O'Reilly funded patent reform vehicle BountyQuest, has filed for a number of patents since BountyQuest's demise, including one that covers illuminating water in a toilet bowl (see FIG. 7). Cella's co-inventors include principals of Color Kinetics, which has come under fire for strong-arm patent tactics and whose Board colorfully likens its IP to nuclear weapons."

183 comments

  1. Prior Art by Indy+Media+Watch · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bah!

    When I was young, we used to chug a pitcher of Plutonium and really light up the bowl.

    --

    Indy Media Watch-Proctologist of the Internet

    1. Re:Prior Art by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is valid prior art only if you published your research into peeing into the pool in a renowned and accesible publication on sanitation.

      --
      I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    2. Re:Prior Art by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      I achieve a similar effect by overdosing on vitamins.

    3. Re:Prior Art by digidave · · Score: 4, Funny

      I had it published in the American Sanitation Solution Providers Biweekly Edition (ASS PROBE).

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    4. Re:Prior Art by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      Bah! When I was young, we used to chug a pitcher of Plutonium and really light up the bowl.

      Well, I was going to say tequila instead of Plutonium but same thing.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    5. Re:Prior Art by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 1

      You should try a big block of solid potassium...fun!

      I would recommend running though....

    6. Re:Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not if the new patent reforms pass. then the first inventor is screwed, its first to file that matters.

    7. Re:Prior Art by marciot · · Score: 1

      Original post:

      > > Bah! When I was young, we used to chug a
      > > pitcher of Plutonium and really light up the bowl.

      You wrote:

      > You should try a big block of solid
      > potassium...fun!
      > I would recommend running though....

      I'm not sure this would work. IIUC (if i understand correctly), by "chug a pitcher of Plutonium" the parent meant ingesting plutonium and then "lighting the bowl" during the excretory phase of digestion. This is indicated by the dictionary definition of "chug", which is "to move or travel while making dull explosive sounds" (I kid you not).

      Which brings us to the present suggestion that "big block of solid potassium" might be more fun. Ingesting a big block of potassium would not be in the least fun, and in the event that you suceeded in this task, it is unclear how running would spare you from the attendant conscequence of such a wreckless act.

      -- Marcio

  2. Illuminating Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think they can have that patent

    1. Re:Illuminating Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Illuminating Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "...and whose Board colorfully likens its IP to nuclear weapons."

      They better watch their step, I own the patent on nuclear weapons.

    3. Re:Illuminating Water? by Barryke · · Score: 1
      I think they can have that patent

      I fore one, maynot raise the lid anymore unles turning the lights off first?
      --
      Hivemind harvest in progress..
    4. Re:Illuminating Water? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, they can have it - I don't care.

      I'll tell you one thing though, I for one don't want to see what's in the bowl after I get up and I certainly do NOT want to see it glowing.

  3. Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I already illuminate toilet water, naturally. On the other hand, maybe my microwave needs to be fixed.

  4. Full of shit by Nazi+Pope · · Score: 4, Informative

    This guy is full of
    shit


    Have a read down the list below. If this patent is granted, we will all be
    taking dumps in the dark.


    The items in question:


    57. A method of providing illumination for a toilet, comprising: providing a
    light system with a plurality of LEDs and a processor for controlling a color of
    light from the LEDs; and disposing the light system in connection with a toilet.

    58. A method of claim 57, wherein disposing the light system comprises disposing
    it on the seat of the toilet.

    59. A method of claim 57, wherein disposing the light system comprises disposing
    it in the toilet bowl.

    60. A method of claim 57, wherein disposing the light system comprises disposing
    it in a rack above the toilet bowl.

    61. A method of claim 57, wherein disposing the light system comprises disposing
    it in connection with an odor control facility.

    62. A system for providing illumination for a toilet, comprising: a light system
    with a plurality of LEDs and a processor for controlling a color of light from
    the LEDs; and a toilet, wherein the light system is disposed to illuminate a
    portion of the toilet.

    63. A system of claim 63, wherein the light system is disposed on the seat of
    the toilet.

    64. A system of claim 63, wherein the light system is disposed in the toilet
    bowl.

    65. A system of claim 63, wherein the light system is disposed in a rack above
    the toilet bowl.

    66. A system of claim 63, wherein the light system is disposed in connection
    with an odor control facility.


    1. Re:Full of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      63. A system of claim 63, wherein the light system is disposed on the seat of the toilet.

      This could get redundant.

    2. Re:Full of shit by Tx · · Score: 2, Funny

      IOW he's trying to patent any use of LED lighting anywhere in or around a toilet. Surely the requirement for inventions not to be obvious would prevent this patent from being granted.

      63. A system of claim 63, wherein the light system is disposed on the seat of
      the toilet.


      I like the recursive nature of this item though, maybe the guy is a GNU fan.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:Full of shit by Alien+Being · · Score: 1, Funny

      67. A system for providing illumination for a toilet, comprising: a school of sharks with frickin' lasers beams attached to their heads.

    4. Re:Full of shit by Alien+Being · · Score: 0

      68. A system of claim 67, wherein the sharks swim in synchronization with Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon.

    5. Re:Full of shit by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine the endless hours of fun you'll have creating a short in one of these toilets so that when your drunken buddies go pee......ZAPP!!!

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    6. Re:Full of shit by Loco3KGT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      69. A system of claim 68, wherein the user watches the Wizard of Oz while listening to Dark Side of the Moon.

      Or was it The Wall that all the potheads listened to while watching that movie.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    7. Re:Full of shit by drinkypoo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's dark side of the moon. You should try it sometime, I download a pre-moon'd version and the coincidence of music and action is too good to be accidental.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Full of shit by stretch0611 · · Score: 1

      Does that mean if I go out and get drunk, then have a "technicolor yawn" while "praying to the porcelin god" that I am infringing on his patents and he can sue more for royalties?

      If I take my "technicolor yawn" and send it to his home address am I no longer liable for royalties?

      --
      Looking for a job?
      Want your resume written professionally?
      DON'T USE TUNAREZ!!!
    9. Re:Full of shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This guy is full of shit

      No pun intended (?).

    10. Re:Full of shit by Robotz · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wouldn't this toilet seat count as prior art? http://www.kiss-textil.de/galactikaen.htm

    11. Re:Full of shit by Loco3KGT · · Score: 1

      I actually did it with my roommates in college. The ones that were high though the coincidence was unbelievable.

      The sober ones were left wondering why we were watching a TV with no sound to a music track that was off beat. I only remember two scenes where I was like "wow, that's dead on." But I bet any Vin Diesel movie over a Metallica CD would probably do the same thing.

      --
      Blessed be he who reads this post, Cursed be he who tells my boss.
    12. Re:Full of shit by back_pages · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Surely the requirement for inventions not to be obvious would prevent this patent from being granted.

      I've said this countless times and my goal is to be eventually moderated Redundant instead of alternating between Troll and Informative.

      [Crash course]"Obvious" as regards a US patent means that you can produce multiple pieces of prior that can be combined to produce the claimed invention, AND you have documented motivation in the prior art (very preferably in one of those references).[/Crash course]

      See for yourself: MPEP 2143

      Many people seem to think that "obviousness" as regards patents has to do with "how hard it was to come up with", "how stupid the idea is", or "how trivial the invention is". This is complete fantasy.

      "Obviousness", as regards the US patent system, merely means that no single piece of prior art teaches the entire invention (that would be an issue of novelty). In this case, you would need to find prior art references that teach something along the lines of illuminating a toilet as well as WHY ON EARTH someone would want to illuminate a toilet. That hurdle crossed, illuminating with LEDs would be the easy part, as there are numerous sources documenting the advantages of LEDs over other light sources.

      I'm not trying to rant on you, but I've posted this little (extremely well) known secret about the US patent system at least 25 times in the last 5 months. It's not you, it's me ;)

      And I'm not saying that this won't be rejected under 35 USC 103 (obvious), but I'm definitely not an expert in the shit-bowl illumination technology. Actually, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if somebody from Japan invented this exact same thing 10 years ago. Something about this idea strikes me as distinctly Japanese, no offense intended to our robot-dog-making schoolgirl-anime-loving generally-culturally-insane Japanese friends.

      I like the recursive nature of this item though, maybe the guy is a GNU fan.

      That's a trivial issue under 35 USC 112, second or fourth paragraph (depending on how the examiner chooses to deal with it) for an improper dependent claim. If he can figure out what it's supposed to depend upon, he'll probably use fourth paragraph and require correction. If he can't figure out what it's supposed to depend upon, he'll probably use second paragraph to basically say, "I cannot figure out WTF you are trying to claim, correction is respectfully required."

      See, the patent system is so easy to understand, everybody CAN be an expert.

  5. Prior art should be easy to find on that one... by PornMaster · · Score: 0

    I'd like to see the patent you're talking about, but even without seeing it, prior art would make it ludicrous to try to enforce.

    Got the patent #?

    1. Re:Prior art should be easy to find on that one... by R.D.Olivaw · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Prior art should be easy to find on that one... by thgreatoz · · Score: 0

      Joke.

      --
      When their numbers dwindled from 50 to 8, the dwarves began to suspect Hungry.
  6. I don't get it... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is this him trying to get an utterly absurd patent to forward the cause of patent reform, or is he just the sort of whore who would take a CEO position at a patent-reforming company, then start patenting willy-nilly when it went belly up?

    1. Re:I don't get it... by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I don't know, but I smell money.

      I'm going to apply for a patent for "Method and Process for Modifying the Air Flow Characteristics of Olfactory Sensors"

      ... then I can start charging all the little brats for picking their noses.

  7. inovation by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 4, Funny

    for all those who think that the sun shines out of their backside ...

    --
    Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
  8. What someone really needs to invent... by j0e_average · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is persistantly glowing toilet water, so when that Charles Cella goes in and drops that big brick (that he's so full of) and water splashes his undercarriage, he can walk around with a glowing backside!

  9. Oh yeah! Well... by binaryspiral · · Score: 2, Funny

    I filed a patent for turning the lighted water in a toilet bowl yellow.

    What kind of stupid moron thinks this patent is worth the paper its written on? Is there a large market for lighted toilet water? What kind of competition is out there?

    1. Re:Oh yeah! Well... by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      Illuminating is nothing. They need to project advertising and video. I'm sure that accuracy will increase, especially with "targeted" ads, and even when the video isn't visible (due to a seated delivery position), the flickering glow and audio from below will have a significant relaxing effect.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    2. Re:Oh yeah! Well... by rworne · · Score: 1

      We should collectively patent a method of projecting multimedia applications/adverts such as Flash on toilet water.

      It gives a whole new meaning to the web banner ads begging to "hit the cockroach", "shock the monkey" or "swat the fly".

      Now we will have "sink the battleship" or "put out the fire". Men at urinals everywhere will try to "shoot down the zero" or rack up points pissing down animated flies.

      Dunno what we would do for the women...

      --
      I tried every decent and legal way I could think of to resolve the issue w/the business before I rented the chicken suit
    3. Re:Oh yeah! Well... by Senzei · · Score: 1
      Dunno what we would do for the women...

      How about free text messaging so they don't have to take a herd of 40 in there just so one can go to the bathroom? Either that or they need sharp sticks so they don't have to go as a group to fight off the monsters.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
    4. Re:Oh yeah! Well... by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Everytime I hit one of those I get a virus... would that work the same way in a toilet ad?

  10. Here we go again by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yet another stupid patenting case. It's all getting pretty monotonous.

    What we really need is a patent that *hurt*. Nothing will get rid of this ridiculous system, until we find a way to grab the legislators in the balls.

    Maybe we need to play dirty. We need patents that compromise the US's national defense. Patents that prevent the IRS from doing its job. Patents that hurt lawyers, and politicians, and people in charge of the system who have no idea what they are doing.

    1. Re:Here we go again by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We need patents that compromise the US's national defense. Patents that prevent the IRS from doing its job.

      Those wouldn't help, as Congress could just authorize eminent domain and expense a token "just compensation".

    2. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true but if theres so many of them, as to cause them irritation - it might make them think.
      On the other hand congress is bought and paid for by corporations.
      Theres little hope of them seeing what is in the common good anymore :(

    3. Re:Here we go again by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 2, Informative

      perhaps instead of small ip hoarding companies such as eolas suing microsoft, they should go after their customers - the US government. This would be much better for all involved (except microsoft, who it would hurt the same, prehaps more). hopefully the us goverment would get off their arse and get rid of software patents and supid patents in other fields.

    4. Re:Here we go again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      ... until we find a way to grab the legislators in the balls.

      I'm sure we can come up with a toilet design that grabs the legislators by the balls. Prior art will be the work of the winner of the 2004 Darwin Award: http://www.big-boys.com/articles/2004darwinawards. html/

    5. Re:Here we go again by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      perhaps instead of small ip hoarding companies such as eolas suing microsoft, they should go after their customers - the US government.

      Customers aren't liable for a business' violating a patent. To wit, Polaroid v. Kodak: Kodak made an instant camera that violated Polaroid's patent on same. Kodak had to stop making the infringing cameras and their film plus pay Polaroid damages + interest plus had to buy back all the infringing Kodak cameras from people that bought them. Side note: It's often amusing to search ebay for kodamatic instant, kodak instant or kodak colorburst and see just how damn many dumb rubes are trying to sell off a camera for which no film will ever again be available. Even more amusing is seeing one with a bid on it!

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  11. picutures? by AviLazar · · Score: 0

    I like pictures. Now while I can go to the site, no pictures show up. Anyone got a mirror somewhere?

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    1. Re:picutures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one in my car.

    2. Re:picutures? by bradleyland · · Score: 1

      The USPTO likes to embed TIFF images into web pages. Right click and save, then rename the resulting file with a TIFF extension. This method removes and need for a *gasp* plug-in.

    3. Re:picutures? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Tried right clicking and saving - didn't give me the option.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    4. Re:picutures? by bradleyland · · Score: 1

      You have to right-click, save, locate file, rename with .tiff, view. Lame, I know, but beats a plug-in.

  12. He can have it by mwood · · Score: 1

    ...so long as he doesn't infringe my patent on Improvement in Method of Leaving Things Well Enough Alone.

  13. Is there an invention here? by russotto · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Or is it just a bunch of blue-skying about lighting things up?

    I think this is the sort of patent Justice Bradley described as the "foam" of the "advancing wave of improvement".

    1) People like things lit
    2) There's lots of ways of lighting things now.
    3) Here, we'll broadly patent lighting up a whole bunch of things.
    4) PROFIT

    Though I think the "inventor" must have been forced at gunpoint to write this patent... consider the line "Example: as your tidy bowl reached the terrifying point of not flooding the sewer lines with chlorine at every flush, your tiny tricolor LED would pulse RED hues to alert you."

    1. Re:Is there an invention here? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I think the "inventor" must have been forced at gunpoint to write this patent... consider the line "Example: as your tidy bowl reached the terrifying point of not flooding the sewer lines with chlorine at every flush, your tiny tricolor LED would pulse RED hues to alert you."

      Hey! That Tidy Bowl stuff really keeps the bowl clean. Who cares if it's polluting the environment. You think that stuff you flush down the toilet is any good for the environment either?

      Don't knock it before you've tried it. Oh, and add 1/2 cup of bleach to the bowl after putting in a fresh dispenser. Mmm, smell the chemical cleanliness!

    2. Re:Is there an invention here? by TyfStar · · Score: 2, Funny

      i'm thinking they just found SOME way to light things in water, or under water, with a microchip. Once discovered, you've got to CYA just in the off chance that it's used for something that actually makes money. You'll see EVERYTHING on there: shaving cream, perfume, any container, any container with a liquid.

      I'd be inclined to think someone told them "It's a good idea. Better include everything AND the kitchen sink on your patent." So they did.

      --

      "There is a reason Linux is free"

      ~me~

  14. K***** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just try patenting the illumination of plumbing fixtures. I work for a lighting company. One of our main clients is a plumbing fixture manufacturer whose name begins with K.

    We light commodes, suanas, showers, baths, and faucets all day long, and we won't stop anytime soon.

    See you at the National Homebuilders Show.

    (FYI, colors you will never see in our displays illuminating commodes or tubs: yellow or red. Think about it.)

    1. Re:K***** by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 1

      www.kohler.com

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    2. Re:K***** by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would that be Kohler?

    3. Re:K***** by Vengeance · · Score: 1

      If you aren't already using bowl, seat, or rack-mounted, microprocessor-controlled LEDs to do this job, then you aren't demonstrating prior art.

      --
      It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
    4. Re:K***** by chadjg · · Score: 1

      Of course, but the biggest objection, other than tis patent is stupid, is that putting the controller in the seat isn't terribly novel or non-obvious.

      Any moron with a little cash can file one of these patents. I'm hoping someone slaps this one down, and hard. I'm also not holding my breath.

      --
      Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
    5. Re:K***** by back_pages · · Score: 1
      You might find it worth your time to consult your company's lawyer and direct them to 37 CFR 1.99

      Patent examiners are generally given about 10 hours to conduct a prior art search. If they find it, they find it. If they don't, they go home to their families and private lives at the end of the day like anyone else. If you have a financial interest in the prior art, make a simple submission under 37 CFR 1.99. If you have non-secret information, like publicly available product manuals, blue prints, or other extremely detailed documentation, you can probably skip the legal fees and submit the references yourself.

      Either way, spending $10-$500 now to make sure that the examiner definitely sees your references is money well spent if the application reads directly on your business interests.

  15. Am I in trouble? by digidave · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he has a patent on lighting toilet water and I have lights in my swimming pool... does that mean I can be sued if I pee in my pool?

    Oh wait, prior art. I did that twenty five years ago. *Whew*

    --
    The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
  16. Let's be honest about this by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

    This shit is very illuminating!

    1. Re:Let's be honest about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I patent my technique of turning the toilet water yellow?

    2. Re:Let's be honest about this by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      only if it doesn't require any outside light sources! Then your question can be reduced to: If a tree falls and no one is there, does it make a sound?

  17. Prior art device to create lighted target in bowl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It attached to the seat lid and shined a light into the bowl to provide a "lights out" target for stand-up pee-ers to aim at.

    I saw this at least 5 years ago.

    Also, Japan is so far ahead of the US for toliet automation -they haves seats/toliets that have lights, sprayed perfumes, measure blood pressure, urine sugar, fecal blood, spray water on your ass after you're done, etc, etc, etc.

  18. He's patenting case mods! by crovira · · Score: 1

    Sorry but it looks like he's trying to make all case modders pay him on his patent.

    The glowing toilet crap is just that, crap. And about as likely to sell.

    But, from what I read, "All your case mods are belong to him."

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:He's patenting case mods! by magefile · · Score: 1

      Hmm ... a water-cooled plexiglass case shaped like a toilet. /me sits back and waits for some idiot with more money and time than sense to make some pretty pictures for /.

    2. Re:He's patenting case mods! by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Umm, let me get this straight: you want to build a computer in a *toilet* case?

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    3. Re:He's patenting case mods! by Senzei · · Score: 1

      Damn, I wish I could substitute half a sentance with whatever the hell I wanted and believe that to be reality.

      --
      Slashdot: Where anecdotes and generalizations can be freely substituted for facts, logic, or intelligence
  19. Next on the patent list...? by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...lighting a fart?

    Unless someone claims prior (f)art??!!

    Sorry.

    --
    AT&ROFLMAO
    1. Re:Next on the patent list...? by aussie_a · · Score: 0

      first fart?

  20. did anyone else read that as "lightning"? by BadElf · · Score: 0

    i almost choked on my coffee when i first read that headline... a "lightning toilet"?

    behold the flush of god!

    1. Re:did anyone else read that as "lightning"? by Baorc · · Score: 1
      Yeah I did, I wasn't too sure at first, I still thought it was that until I start reading the subject.

      I was really wondering what they were trying to do. I really can't understand why they can't leave our shit alone....

  21. Bring on the Vogon construction fleets. by TractorBarry · · Score: 2, Funny

    Lighting toilet water ? Patenting it ? America truly leads the world in innovation.

    Bring on the Vogon construction fleets. Truly our species no longer has any worth.

    --
    Sky subscribers are morons. They pay to be advertised at !
    1. Re:Bring on the Vogon construction fleets. by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Nah, bring on the "B" Ark. We'll get rid of all the unnecessary people and enjoy a utopian society!
      (Note: do not get rid of phone sanitizers)

  22. I thought it said "lightning" by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    That would have been a shocking development. Is there a massive crack problem in the patent office? It's like Eric Idle on SNL talking about how the USA has been using the English language without paying any royalites.

  23. Aha! by mclaincausey · · Score: 1

    So that's what backlit Taco Bell-and-coffee-induced diarrhea looks like...
    Just what the world needs, a better lighting on our turds.
    Brilliant.

    --
    (%i1) factor(777353);
    (%o1) 777353
  24. This is absurdly pointless... by alchemist68 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why would anyone want to illuminate the poo floating or sunken in toilet bowl water? Is this guy patenting this for sake of doing it?

    FYI, most poo is brown (depending on your diet and health) and emits low molecular weight volatile organic compounds (this is why you smell it). I don't need to see it in the dark in the middle of the night. The next thing you know, they'll attach a linux cluster to it with sensors and cataloging every loaf-pinching session for monitoring your health, nutrient uptake, excretory efficiency rating, etc... Then when you're sick, the toilet can forward all the data to the doctors at the hospital.

    "Yup Mr. Smith, it's right here in your toilet's log, your daily intake of fiber decreased over a 7 month period. We recommend that you buy 42 coconuts with the soft fiberous shell intact, and eat the shreaded fiber for one week. This will remove all of the undigested red meat that is obstructing your bowels."

    Worse yet, I actually took the (wasted) time to write this scenerio.

    1. Re:This is absurdly pointless... by mcd7756 · · Score: 1
      Nothing new under the moon...

      http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/1433904.stm

      --
      Am I not destroying my enemies when I make friends of them? --Abraham Lincoln
    2. Re:This is absurdly pointless... by 00null00 · · Score: 1

      toilet's log... ha!

    3. Re:This is absurdly pointless... by JahToasted · · Score: 1

      I think they already have this in Japan. "They're years ahead of us" in toilet technology as homer simpson once observed.

  25. Sierra! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BountyQuest? I've been waiting for a new series from Sierra, maker of King's Quest and Space Quest!

  26. don't mix claims no. 6 and 12 together!!! by capsteve · · Score: 3, Interesting

    look at the ingredients they intend to illuminate... i hope it's not all together...

    6. A method of claim 5(container contains a fluid), wherein the fluid is selected from the group consisting of water, ammonia, bleach, window cleaner, insect repellant, insect killer, lotion, soap, liquid soap, kitchen cleaner, bathroom cleaner, shaving gel, cleaning fluid, lighter fluid, furniture polish, wood treatment, paint, primer, drain cleaner, disinfectant, room deodorizer, carpet deodorizer, room scent, perfume, cologne, shaving foam, toilet cleaner, aerosol, skin care fluid, suntan lotion, shampoo, surface cleaner, and liquid wax.

    12. A method of claim 1(lighting a product), wherein the household product is selected from the group consisting of a pencil, a pen, a fork, a knife, a spoon, a kitchen utensil, a whisk, a broom, a bottle, a glass, a mug, a coffee maker, a toothpaste tube, a dispenser, a shampoo bottle, a soap holder, a razor, an electric razor, a hair dryer, a picture frame, a marker, a jar, a makeup facility, a perfume dispenser, a brush, a lipstick, and a candle.

    IMHO the USPTO is giving out too many highly specific applications patents. maybe if i specify that my lighting system only illuminates the "toiletbowl-bound stream of urine just before surface impact, thereby creating a firework like display" i'll get a patent for lighting a toiletbowl too! then i can sue anyone who turns the light on to pee!

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
    1. Re:don't mix claims no. 6 and 12 together!!! by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you had a rapidly scanning laser positioned just above the waterline in the bowl, trained to scan for a few cm above the waterline, then you would get a very funky display.

      Use 2 or 3 and gradient the colours for that final touch.

      You're onto a winner there!

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  27. Color Kinetics patent issues by GodBlessTexas · · Score: 3, Informative

    It looks as if Color Kinetics is about to have much, if not all, of their IP portfolio ruled invalid because of a plethora of existing prior art from as far back as the 1970's. All of this has come to light (no pun intended) after their lawsuit with Super Vision International. With that in mind, I don't now how to take this one. Is this a stupid patent that just injures Color Kinetics IP case more, or are they serious? Wouldn't the existing LED based technology that is used to illuminate pools be considered prior art, i.e. the Boca Flash products?

    --
    Remember the Alamo, and God Bless Texas...
    1. Re:Color Kinetics patent issues by gowen · · Score: 1

      Jesus F Christ.

      Two companies involved in a multi-million dollar lawsuit over who has monopoly rights on lighting an assortment of meaningless tat with a bunch of LEDs.

      Let us hope that such government by the legal profession and for the legal profession will never vanish from this earth.

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    2. Re:Color Kinetics patent issues by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or the LED PEN, which I have in my hand right now...

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
  28. Two actual bona fide applications for this patent by G4from128k · · Score: 5, Interesting
    A couple of "real" uses for this patent include:
    1. Spectroscopic analysis of waste products to determine the health of the depositor. There has been some serious R&D on home healthcare monitoring system that analyze waste products (glucose in urine, fiber or blood in the stool, etc.). One scheme is optical or fluorescent spectroscopy of the bowl contents and LEDs could be the light source.
    2. Germicidal lighting: if they use a UV-C LED (280 nm wavelength), then this system could help kill bacteria and viruses in the bowl (And give a nice oval tan on the sitter's butt).
    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  29. A bit about multi-color LED lighting by maggard · · Score: 4, Informative
    For those out of the loop on this...

    LEDs emit light, directly or indirectly, only on a few narrow wavelengths. Therefore unless you're looking for just those few colors you're going to have to do mixing of multiple LEDs to get intermediate shades.

    Complicating things further is that not all wavelengths are emitted equally strongly, and also that the human eye doesn't perceive all color equally strongly. This isn't a case of RGB, or CMY, it's a few off-variations of differing intensities.

    Therefore to produce a specific shade, say Corporate Logo Color, Pantone #22578, isn't a no-brainer. The same is true for visually smoothly fading from shade to shade, it's not just a matter of turning down Bank A and turning up Bank B. Instead some calculations need to take place to make it all look decent, and that is the space where Color Kinetics has got their patents.

    BTW, for those interested, Color Kinetics makes a home product series, "Sauce". These are night-lights & light bulb replacements that can be set to strobe, flicker, cross-fade in different ranges, etc. They're pricey at US $10-20, are available at many toy stores, and tend to crap out after a year or two of use (the blue goes.)

    I use mine in my bathroom as a ever cross-fading night light, also set to one shade or another on on an empty white living room wall to 'punch it up'. I've friends who use their's for mood lighting in their bedroom.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
    1. Re:A bit about multi-color LED lighting by claussenvenable · · Score: 1

      However, Color Kinetics patents are broad enough so as to be construed as covering *simply* PWM-control and turning up Bank A/turning down Bank B. Obviously that would be a very hard sell in court, but it's made an impact on other people's product development decisions.

      I can't say who, but a big company I've worked for has specifically backed away from colored LED stuff because of the potential PR nightmare from annihilating the bullshit counterproductive elements in CK's patents.

      Fortunately colored LED lighting patents are about as important to the state of the world as P. Diddy's latest car purchase. It's super lame, but IMHO it's not costing us a whole lot.

      Personally, I hope all the CK patents get trashed in court.

    2. Re:A bit about multi-color LED lighting by Jott42 · · Score: 1

      But at least the "Sauce" ramge of things do exactly that: pure ramping of the different PWM-controlled LEDs. The spectrum that the toys go through is not percieved as a constant hue-speed change, but it changes abruptly sometimes. I was very disappointed with this...

    3. Re:A bit about multi-color LED lighting by grotzylsberg · · Score: 1

      For those out of the loop on this...

      What about those of us who are out of the poop?

    4. Re:A bit about multi-color LED lighting by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Somebody at the patent office didn't see prior art on this. One of the electronics home experimenter magazines decades ago had a construction article with PWM-modulated LEDs for lighting control. Certainly earlier than the ten years ago the inventors claimed they started playing with LEDs in college.

    5. Re:A bit about multi-color LED lighting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other manufacturers have been doing these "calculations" for decades when dimming incandescent lights. When phase-angle controlling incandescent light fixtures, you have to do a mapping of desired perceived intensity (say 0-100%) to phase angle. Exactly the same sort of "calculation" as when mapping desired intensity to PWM duty cycle for LEDs.

      If you replace the solid-state relay in a decent incandescent dimmer with an LED, guess what happens? The LED dims and brightens. It might not be perceived as linear, but that's just a matter of plugging in a different mapping. You could argue that the CK perceived intensity map to PWM duty cycle is a trade secret though.

  30. Re:I never meta-patatent i didnt like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Only one thing for it. Can we patent the Justice System?

  31. Big s*** patents big s***. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 0

    There, now you don't need to RTFA ;-)

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  32. Throw a snake in the mix by syntap · · Score: 0

    and you can truly shed some light on a lot of crap.

    Sorry.

  33. Can't tell by mattr · · Score: 1

    if it is meant seriously or not. Of course the thing the /. poster caught about toilets is 1% of the total. It has some interesting ideas like lighting a bottle of wood stain so you can see the color and making spray from a spray can look like rainbows. But of course 99% silly and obvious, if LEDs and processors were cheap.. on the other hand if you are talking about lighting your house with such a processor and aimable leds or projectors (and I've been interested in the projector side for a while) then it is either a silly extension to prior art, or possibly even dangerous. As for toilets, it might be useful if you had a power outage but the toilet lit up the room. Also for checking urine color for medical data input, diabetic feedback, ketone check for dieting etc., of course this is already done, as is the cleansing function.. IIRC Japanese toilet bowls (some) have UV or other cleansing mechanisms, certainly they have LEDs in the armrest next to the toilet seat but nobody ever I think expressed that much interest in looking clearly into a toilet bowl in a dark room. I suppose the only useful purpose for which I could imagine wanting to use it is if someone got up in the middle of the night (I suppose more likely for females) and didn't turn on the bathroom light because it hurts the eyes, but then needs for sanitary reasons to be able to see what one is doing after finishing with business. A very low level light (LED) would be sufficient in that case, though it should come from overhead or the side (that "shelf" they mention?), not from inside the toilet bowl. Anyway this is a ridiculously broad patent and I don't see any actual invention, or reason why a processor or led is needed.

    1. Re:Can't tell by magefile · · Score: 1

      You can't go to the bathroom in the dark? Man, I don't know whether to laugh or cry.

    2. Re:Can't tell by mattr · · Score: 1

      Cry if you see tire treads on your sheets in the morning. (ick!)

  34. Re:WTF, third post marked redundant??? by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Probably because the "patent on patents" joke appears in every single patent discussion. Redundancy isn't limited to submission.

    I also expect to see lots of "I patent using patents to get licensing fees". Always funny.

  35. He shots, he scores! by Phu5ion · · Score: 1
    Finally i have something to aim at when it's 2AM, it's dark and i'm piss drunk (no pun intended).

    But semi-seriously, this thing will really take off once they get Billy Mays to sell it over an infomercial.

    --
    Slashdot is kind of like Playboy; we aren't here to read the articles.
  36. Vapoorizer? by se7en11 · · Score: 0

    I thought the article was refering to Vapoorizer.

  37. Re:Man, I hope they don't patent... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    I guess Slashdot would provide heaps of prior art for that!

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  38. Prior art? by northcat · · Score: 1

    Is this prior art? The bottom of the page says " Copyright © 1994-2005 mkp.net....". So it's been up since 1994 or at least from a few years. Although the site says illuminated toilet, not illuminated toilet *water*, it does seem like pretty much what the patent says. (Note: It's not exactly a complete implementation of illuminated toilet/water, but the idea is there on the webpage and that's all that matters.)
    (Also note to the webmaster: sorry for slashdotting your site, dude.)

  39. Interesting Colr Kinetics LED patent history by Mononoke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Color Kinetics has a long history of overly broad patent schemes. Some were so bad that a their competitors in the LED lighting field were forced to form an alliance to combat the CK's over-reaching patent strategies.

    --
    NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
  40. Re:Two actual bona fide applications for this pate by gowen · · Score: 1
    Spectroscopic analysis of waste products to determine the health of the depositor. There has been some serious R&D on home healthcare monitoring system that analyze waste products
    I wouldn't describe it as prior art, per se, but every endurance athlete in the world knows how to extract basic health/hydration information from the colour / consistency of urine.

    PS : If you get into the "consistency" bit, you're in big, big trouble.
    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  41. Wait a second... by criordan · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't lightning toilet water be really dangerous?

    --
    http://www.aaplblog.com/ - News about Apple Inc.
  42. Re:Prior art device to create lighted target in bo by AndroidCat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I don't think I'd feel safe if I dropped the soap in that bathroom.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  43. This serves as notice by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 0

    of my intent to patent bioactive toilet bowl lighting and intent to register the trademark.

    Psychedelic Toilet Zoo

    PTZ for the marketing weasels.

    Yes, you guessed it. Bio-engineered, bio-luminescent, zooplankton populated from a secondary waste reservoir, AKA they process cage,
    will iluminate both waste and and art forms one may whish to incorporate into the bowl. As an added benefit, the low-flush bane of man, problem is errrr eliminated through recycling of a portion of previous flushes from said process cage.

    Here is how it works.
    Sensors detect the presence of solid or liquid waste to control a proportioning valve which directs an appropriate amount of waste from the discharge line to the prerocess cage. Ths is necessaryto maintain the proper nutrituinal components for the zooplankton which breed in the cage. A linux(or other OS) baded micro-controller keeps track of plankton health and nutrition levels.

    In short. A flush feeds some fresh and some waste, in part to the cage and in part to the waste lines. Effluent levels are independent of inflow to afford a good volume for flushing while maintaining the legally imposed 1.6 gallon maximum fresh water flush threshold. Stirring the water by adding waste to the bowl activates zooplankton from the previous flush thereby illuminating the contents, art, or what have you with the fluid dynamics of the flush creating a burst of luminescent activity as ones waste departs.

    Talks are planend with municipal planning professional organizations in hopes of obtaining government subsidies for the PTZ as the zooplankton eliminate much of the downstream waste processing load. Other benefits include more colorful streams and rivers, fatter whales, and tastier crabs.

    Currently seeking first round funding. Only 6 positions available at the $US4million level. Missed out ong google, well here's your chance at redemption and the good feeling that comes from aiding the planet, the children, and art.

    Whoops.
    Gotta GO now.

  44. Sovereign immunity by redelm · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sorry, won't work. The US Federal government has the right to use any patent it wishes, royalty-free.

    Lawyers & politicians haven't been doing much new and innovative that might be stopped by patent. That's one of their many problems.

    1. Re:Sovereign immunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please cite which law or regulation covers this.

      Note that what you said "right", as in current, ongoing, ever present. This is different than the US government revoking, extending, shortening, etc. a specific patent, as they did with the Blackberry situation last year or two. This I know they can do. But unless they pass specific legislation, I don't think they have a blank check on any (at least domestic, see below) patent out there.

      Further, I'd like to see how this compares with foreign patents, as many patents are foreign and under international agreement.

    2. Re:Sovereign immunity by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Sorry, won't work. The US Federal government has the right to use any patent it wishes, royalty-free.

      Well, it might work... assuming the current government motto of "outsource everything" comes into play. Take for example, Private Military Companies. If the army wants to sidestep Geneva conventions and public oversight by outsourcing the ugly parts to corporations, then someone should be able to patent something important to effectively toss a sabot into the machinery.

      Left as an exercise to reader: After declaring your patent and filing suit to prevent infringement, try to stay alive long enough to see the trial to closure.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  45. Real Prior Art by ABaumann · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://inventionshowcase.com/jlhome.htm

  46. Re:resume of the article...with colors... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
    if your water is black, you are sick

    I get that anyway... although I probably drink waaay too much Guinness.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  47. stop being so hard on this patent by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 1

    How else could GI Joe avoid the shark?

  48. Re:Two actual bona fide applications for this pate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japan already has this kind of stuff

    They didn't list UV light purification, but it is obvious they are going for "Toilet has home health station".

  49. Re:Prior art device to create lighted target in bo by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't think I'd feel safe if I dropped the soap in that bathroom.

    Don't worry. Robots never have any interest in abusing the orifices of innocent humans. Not even in Japan.

    That's the tentacle demons' job, and their union is very touchy about demarcation issues and has high-level contacts with the yakuza.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  50. Myth: Busted by don_carnage · · Score: 2, Informative

    Err...Mythbusters busted that myth. See the "Peeing on the third rail" episode. Apprarently, the urine stream is not solid, but rather made up of droplets after a certain distance. Informative!

    1. Re:Myth: Busted by magefile · · Score: 1

      The difference in distance, height-wise, between the toilet and the ground (where the 3rd rail is) might be big enough that the droplets wouldn't have that "certain distance" in which to form. IDK, just speculation.

    2. Re:Myth: Busted by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 1

      They've obviously never been tricked into peeing on an electric fence. The doctors still aren't sure if I will ever be able to impregnate a woman. Sheep, yes; women, maybe.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    3. Re:Myth: Busted by Cecil · · Score: 1

      Mythbusters busted that myth. See the "Peeing on the third rail" episode.

      I have issues with their test method. Their fake, gravity-powered bladder is no match for a real, muscle-powered bladder. The correct next step would be to film a real guy peeing to see if the stream is solid, not to move the rail up to within an inch of their dummy. But I guess they didn't have time to do that or something, so instead they go with the cheap, easy way out so they can show their dummy getting 'electrocuted' in front of the camera to wrap up their show.

      Rather disappointing, and I think their results would've been different otherwise.

    4. Re:Myth: Busted by don_carnage · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was another episode in which they followed-up on that "third rail" experiment using Adam as the test dummy. Hilarity ensued. He actually did get shocked by the electric fence, but then he was inches from it.

    5. Re:Myth: Busted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did it on Jackass...and it hurt real bad

  51. Toilet Light? by 514CK3R · · Score: 0

    Do they expect someone to be inside trying to see something? Seriously gross man.

  52. Tubgirl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Count down to the first Tubgirl link 3.,. 2... 1...

  53. Another obvious punchline... by KipCas · · Score: 1

    After reading that I pictured the TV commercial that offers to help you patent your own ideas. When it shows the people holding up popular products screaming "That was my idea!"

    That will be me now every time I light up the toilet bowl after a trip to Taco Bell.

    Thanks, I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

    --
    Turk: Let's play Steak. J.D.: What? Turk: Steak. The 1st person to finish their steak is the winner of Steak. -Scrubs
  54. Re:resume of the article...with colors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The guy's probably a quebecer. They always invert the "h" sound when talking english. It's hilarious! It's EElarious! EYE! MY NAME IS HHHHALEX. OW HARE YOU?

  55. Seems obvious to me... by Phidoux · · Score: 1

    ... that this is someone who is trying to point out just how ludicrous the US patent system is.

  56. Amazing ingenuity ;-( by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
    Recent advances in semiconductors--LEDs are chips that glow when current runs through them--make that possible. Mueller and Lys anticipated those advances when they first tinkered with LEDs ten years ago [i.e. 1992 approx.] as students at Carnegie Mellon University.
    Wow!
    In 1997 he and Lys formed Color Kinetics to explore ways to control LEDs with microprocessors and software.
    There are ways for microprocessors to control voltages or currents? Incredible!
    [H]e and Lys figured out how to yoke together red, green and blue LEDs to make a light that can shine in more than 16 million colors, including white.
    This, of course, must have been a non-trivial, truly patent-worthy achievement - the more you think of age-old stage lighting, or the closer you move to a CRT (if there's still one in front of you), the more you'll certainly be inclined believe it...
    Color Kinetics uses software to pulse electricity to red, green and blue LEDs at different rates, mixing colors digitally the way a painter mixes colors to create different hues.
    ...as no one skilled in the art (in the 1990s!) could have come up with the idea to change the brightness of an LED through chopping instead of e.g. using a DAC.

    Especially since infrared remote controls (at least since the 1970s) would never have used similar techniques to increase range by driving their LEDs with a pulse current significantly higher than the maximum sustained current (an idea which isn't reminiscent of the stroboscope -as opposed to the floodlight- either, of course)...

  57. Toilet bowl light, for 10 cents... by notherenow · · Score: 0

    You take a little bracket (that costs 10 cents), and screw it to the seat. Then, you screw a flashlight to the other end of the bracket, pointing in the toilet.

    --
    We all dance, we all sing.
    -The Streets
  58. I HAVE PRIOR ART ON THIS by sinator · · Score: 1

    I have prior art, thanks to grain alcohol and a devil may care attitude:

    Toilet Water Colored a Brilliant Luminescent Orange-Red

    --
    Three Step Plan:
    1. Take over the world.
    2. Get a lot of cookies.
    3. Eat the cookies.
  59. Syntax error by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This shit is very illuminating!

    This is illuminating my very shit!

    What did you want to go today? You can not miss!

  60. Prior Art by klm20 · · Score: 1

    MKP has prior art on his web site...

    http://mkp.net/glo-loo.html

  61. Old new, my look at it by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

    I got some glow in the dark paint and painted all the vertex's in my house from the Bedroom to the Bathroom (as well as all the lighswitches around the house). I had a perfect run to the toilet without having to turn the lights back on and be dazed by the light. Worked well, seeing all the edges of the walls, the skirting board, edges of the 2 steps down, one step up. Last remaining problem I had was the toilet itself. In my half awake state, I needed a way to tell if the toilet seat was up or down. Quick writing of 'DOWN' on the lid sorted that out. Was originally going to paint the toilet seat, but ended up paiting a thin line around the porcelain, as it gave a usefull target to aim for, if the glowing line was broken, then I was missing the spot, easy and quick to adjust so the noise of water being hit was heard.
    Must admit, I did think a nightlight might of been a tag brighter, but I was trying to make it work without using any electricity at all.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
  62. Uhh no thanks :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methods and systems for illuminating household products... From what I barely understand they want to iluminate the puff of arisol from a automatic air freshener with a variety of colors.

    Sounds like the kinda thing only chavs would buy :)

    (seems the original poster wants to make 'household container' a toilet, when really it would be a very long strech, and a japanese company probably already holds a patent on lighting toilet bowls with various colors)

  63. this whole thing... by ohzero · · Score: 1

    wasn't designed to be a big deal. It started out when Bezos and others were shining a flashlight down the toilet to see if they could find all that blown capital.

    --
    -- http://www.criticalassets.com
  64. Re:Prior art device to create lighted target in bo by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    Ah good, that makes me feel much safer! Just one question, what does the button on those toilets that seems to be marked "sterilize" do?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  65. Re:Prior art device to create lighted target in bo by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

    As someone living in the UK, I find automated bathrooms very offputting. Even the (admittedly a good idea) IR sensors in public toilets in the US don't feature over here.

    As for having my toilet know about my urine sugar, hell no. Start with patents and soon you'll have Microsoft involved.

    Brings a whole new meaning to "Where do you want to go today?" doesn't it?

    --
    How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  66. Prior fart by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Someone better tell those people that make big LED colour jumbo-trons and dot-matrix scroll displays. Well as long as no-one has tried to stick theirs down a toilet they should be ok. BountyQuest should really have given a courtesy flush and checked the records first.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  67. Mucking Forons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It amazes me on the stupid shit people patent.

    What's a patent anyway, except for a law allowing someone to sue you over a thought that they probably didn't have?

  68. Parent modded redundant? (-1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From /.'s FAQ:
    Redundant -- Redundant posts are ones which add no new information, but instead take up space with repeating information either in the Slashdot post, the attached links, or lots of previous comments. For instance, some posters cut and paste otherwise legitimate comments in multiple places in the same discussion; the pasted versions are Redundant.
    Now, I can understand a moderation of offtopic/flamebait/troll, but redundant? Come on!

  69. What we need (intended as a joke) by lineman60 · · Score: 0
    we need the USPO to give us an rss feed. make it of of there new patens. that way we can

    stop wasteing valuable ./ readers time. why get PO'ed on the same issues reoccureing. I mean come on there is an internet full of new and exciteing things to get mad at.

    get irate every time we open Firefox

  70. Re:resume of the article...with colors... by Lovesquid · · Score: 1

    Goes in Guinness, comes out Budweiser.

  71. Nothing New Here! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    OK so if you have a container in your house, with liquid, and a light, your breaking his copy right? Well If you use LEDs, just use xenon lights then.

    Seriously this type of enlightened bullcrapp is a joke. Really bring out the seriousness of our patent system where as someone can actually patent this stuff. If current LEDs where available in the 70's prior art would have ruled this out.

    This patent thing has gone way too far-nothing new, but when the tax paying dollars are going to verify these types of patents...any how I'm surprised they have patented the war on terrorism!

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
    1. Re:Nothing New Here! by instarx · · Score: 1

      No, if you had read the patent you would know that the patent is on the COMBINATION of lighting and a processor. Its not just a light in a container.

      I can think of several valuable uses for a technology of this kind - such as changing the lighting in a refrigerator that holds temperature sensitive materials after a temperature spike. Or by causing individual medicine or food containers that had become dated, spoiled, contaminated, recalled, mishandled or tampered with to glow red.

      The problem I have with it is that this patent now effectively stifles all innovation in the area. I'm no patent lawyer, but I always thought that you could not patent an idea, and this just seems to be an idea that one COULD light things selectively using a processor. This patent clearly seems to be aimed at getting royalties from anyone who comes up with a real product.

      In my mind that is an abuse of the patent system.

  72. real reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After this, look for his website - Lighted Pee Cams - patent pending - only w3 have reel pr0n...

  73. Jesus Christ... look it up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How fucking lazy are you? This isn't hard to confirm.

    Look it up before you get such a ridiculous "Prove it!" attitude!

  74. Google on "Sovereign immunity" patent by redelm · · Score: 1
    You might try learning some of the new WWW search technology. I went to Googleand it returned some excellent references, such as this first. One trick is using good keywords, and you must have missed my including "Sovereign immunity" in the OP.

    As for international violations, they apply only where the patent has jurisdiction. The US government is free to violate french patents so long as they do so on American soil.

  75. Simpsons in Japan by Amiasian · · Score: 1

    *Toilet plays music and shoots colorful fountains of water.*
    Toilet: I am honored to accept your waste.
    Homer: Whoa! They're years ahead of us.

    Kids, watching TV: Hey look, Dad's on TV.
    *Zipper noise.*
    Kids, Marge: AAAAAHAHHHAHAH!

    Anyways, we still haven't caught up with the East's clearly superior lavatory technology. Until then, I say, good luck!

    1. Re:Simpsons in Japan by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      Heh, that's one of my favorite Simpsons moments.

      You forgot to mention, however, that the camera was *inside* the bowl, looking up through the water.

      I'd go into more detail, but I had a bad experience with a certain website, with "cx" as its domain name, as a child....

  76. Splashdot! by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

    "News for turds. Stuff that splatters."

    --
    Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
  77. I have prior art by Tassach · · Score: 1
    Most swimming pools have lights which illuminate the water. People frequently pee in swimming pools, making them a kind of toilet. There's your prior art

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  78. Patent is Pointless for a Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The patent is intended to be stupid and pointless. He's still trying to show why our IP laws and the patent system need to be fixed.

  79. All infringers are liable by crucini · · Score: 1

    Anyone who infringes a patent is liable, even if he bought an infringing item or method from a vendor. The vendor is liable for contributory infringement. In practice, the inventor usually prefers to sue the vendor rather than pursue a huge number of customers whose liability will be quite small.

    For an example of the patent holder pursuing the end user, look up the Solaia case.

    1. Re:All infringers are liable by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Anyone who infringes a patent is liable, even if he bought an infringing item or method from a vendor. The vendor is liable for contributory infringement. In practice, the inventor usually prefers to sue the vendor rather than pursue a huge number of customers whose liability will be quite small. For an example of the patent holder pursuing the end user, look up the Solaia case.

      How about an example that amounts to more than extortion? Solaia has only threatened legal action and received out of court settlments so far. You do have a point in that, in a legal sense, customers can be found liable for infringement, but in cases like Polaroid v. Kodak or Eolas v. Microsoft, there isn't a court in the world that would award damages from people who, in good faith, bought cameras or us IE.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  80. Re:Two actual bona fide applications for this pate by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1
    [...]if they use a UV-C LED (280 nm wavelength)[...]

    Are such things actually available yet? The shortest wavelength LED I'd been able to find for sale thus far was, as I recall, around 340nm, and THEY were $50US each...

  81. You'll love this story.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About 9 years ago at Christmas I was staying with my family at a waterfront house on the Chesapeake Bay in Virginia. There was an ice storm and we lost electrical power. The house used an electric well pump so we had no water to flush toilets.

    We went to the dock and scooped up water in 5 gallon plastic buckets, to be used to flush the toilets. My fiancee made an amazing discovery that evening in the bathroom. When she used the water from the bucket to flush the toilet, the toilet emitted a green glowing light!!

    My fiancee was able to see this because we had no electricity and she was flushing the toilet in the dark using water collected from the cove.

    We got all excited and tried to figure out what was happening. We took a bucket of water into a walk-in closet to make sure there was no outside light source and we found that if we stirred the water it would glow.

    Completely amazing!! Later I found out that the glowing green light was caused by dino flagellate organisms in the water. Sometimes ships will stir these up and leave glowing green trails at night which can be seen from above.

  82. Re:Two actual bona fide applications for this pate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    UV light on my arse? great. now at worst I'll be growing cancerous lumps on my arse just because I needed to take a shit, at best I'll be damaging the skin on my arse. a tan is not fucking healthy, it is damaged skin.

  83. Claim 1 by tuxedobob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Claim 1 sounds not unlike a light switch or an internal refrigerator light, using a generic definition of "processor".

    1. A method of providing illumination (light) for a household product (wall), comprising: providing a light system (lamp) under the control of a processor (light switch + person) for providing illumination (light) of a selected color (white); and disposing the illumination system in proximity to the household product to light a feature of the household product (putting the lamp near a wall).

    Don't like a wall being considered a household object? Fine, pick something else.