Slashdot Mirror


Dell to Get Into Cell Phones in 2006

prostoalex writes "BrightHand looks into the future of Dell Axim PDA line. X30 will be discontinued, X50 will get another update of Windows Mobile, and pretty soon Dell might be entering the cell phone business with PDA+phone Axim combo. The phone line will replaces the X50 model in mid-2006."

157 comments

  1. Fantastic... by jargoone · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dell level 1 tech support is what we need for cell phones.

    Are you currently a live human being? Do you have ears? Is the phone placed next to your ear? Is the phone powered on? Yes, sir, I know that you are talking to me this very minute on the phone in question, but I have to ask these questions in order to escalate your call. Once again, is the phone powered on?

    1. Re:Fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good example, but your tech rep's English is too good.

    2. Re:Fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... unfortunatly that is probably more accurate than it should be.

    3. Re:Fantastic... by releppes · · Score: 1

      Oh man that's funny. Your example is so close to the truth it goes way beyond funny. No joke, but my last tech call went down exactly as you described it!

    4. Re:Fantastic... by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      Dell have NO idea about business efficiency: My gf's relatively new Dell laptop recently shed it's little rubber feet. We asked Dell to send some new ones and Dell refused to put the parts, which probably cost them £0.02p, in a normal envelope so that one of us didn't have to stay inside all day waiting for a parcel and also to save Dell costs but noooo.... it had to be couriered in case the parts got damaged - they're flippin' rubber feet!!! They also came in a huge box with protective foam - what a waste!!

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
    5. Re:Fantastic... by nosse_elendili · · Score: 5, Informative

      Having worked as a Dell Level 1 tech back in the glory days (i.e. before overseas outsourcing), I have to say that I understand why they require these guys to go through the dumb questions. The VAST MAJORITY of the calls that come into tech support are really really stupid and I would say 75% or more of them are fixed by the time they make it through the standard checklist.


      Surely the typical /. reader isn't going to call in unless they have already tried all that stuff, and I understand how frustrating it is to those who actually know something about computers, but believe me the tech's on the other end are not justified in assuming that incoming callers are competent users.


      Insider Hint: the best way for the tech-savvy to get support is to use the online request service option. Avoid the phones like the plague. When you make an online request, take a few sentences to let the tech on the other end know that you have done all the obvious stuff. Since I know what they are looking for, I almost always get a "your part/tech is on the way" response within an hour.

    6. Re:Fantastic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You let your girlfriend get a Dell? No, I don't care if she got it before you met her. Please hand in your geek license.

    7. Re:Fantastic... by jargoone · · Score: 1

      You are, of course, completely correct. However, that doesn't make it any less funny to "us". :-)

      It's like they should have a test that you can take, and if you pass, you get an auth code right to level 2 support.

      Thanks for the online service request tip, it's good to know.

    8. Re:Fantastic... by westlake · · Score: 1
      Dell refused to put the parts, which probably cost them £0.02p, in a normal envelope so that one of us didn't have to stay inside all day waiting for a parcel and also to save Dell costs but noooo.... it had to be couriered in case the parts got damaged - they're flippin' rubber feet

      when you are big enough to contract for courier service at the price Dell pays, then we can talk about costs.

    9. Re:Fantastic... by mattspammail · · Score: 1

      Dell Rep - Sir, please hold down "STAH" an "END" an "POWAH" at de same time for 10 second. That vill re-initialize your phone, and you vill be good to go.

      Customer - Will I lose my address book?

      Dell Rep - Goodness gracious, yes. It's the only vay. Did you back up your phone?

      Customer - I didn't know I was supposed to.

      Dell Rep - Oh, too bad. And you're going to have a new phone number now.

      Customer - Whaaa?

      Dell Rep - Tank you for calling Dell.

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    10. Re:Fantastic... by HaydnH · · Score: 1

      You let your girlfriend get a Dell? No, I don't care if she got it before you met her. Please hand in your geek license.

      I know... she won't let me put linux or solaris on there and refuses to use anything other than IE, then she complains that it keeps slowing down due to adware =/ BTW - I run Fedora core... don't think that qualifies me for a geek

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. - Douglas Adams
  2. My phone can already do pda stuff by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The biggest use of a pda is to keep track of appointments, take notes, and hold contact information - all of which my nokia 6230 can do NOW! PDAs are dying.

    1. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Bluesy21 · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Yeah that might be good for you, but people who actually use PDAs/Smartphones use them because they can enter appointments, contacts, etc on their device without hitting the 6 button 4 times to get one letter. A Nokia or any other normal phone just doesn't have a good input system for this type of data.
      So for all of us that actually use PDAs for their intended purpose have to have a PDA, and cell phone or one of those horrible bulky Smartphones. The only one of acceptable size I've seen are Blackberrys.

    2. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The biggest use of a pda is to keep track of appointments, take notes, and hold contact information - all of which my nokia 6230 can do NOW! PDAs are dying.

      If you noticed they said it would be geared towards business clients. In the world of POS (that's point of sale, not Chevy) the PDA has the ability to replace cash registers. I would bet the new Axim/cell phone thing will have a built in digital camera and optional bar code readers. A cashier with a camera can speed up the RMA process and document abused merchandise. A warehouse employee could use all those things. Imagine a receiving clerk in Chicago receiving faulty merchandise and using his Symbol PDA/scanner to take a picture and e-mail it to his manager in Az to get a decision on receive or refuse. Huge benefit. The PDA is not dying, it is adapting.

    3. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      um, no. not for everyone.
      can it synch the details field of your calendar, for example, rather than just telling you that you've a meeting? can it do wifi? can it run a vnc or RDP client? can it store a gig of mp3s on a cheap SD card? can you run netstumbler on it? i could go on, but i think you get the point.

    4. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 1

      It can do a few of them things, It does tell me the details field of my calender It can run vnc client If I had a gig sd card I could use it to store mp3s.

    5. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by dsginter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      PDAs are dying.

      PDAs would have been dead a long time ago if the industry wasn't so greedy. For example, as you have illustrated, even the most basic of cell phones have had adequate PDA capabilities for years now. My Nokia 3588i certainly does. But I don't use it because Nokia wants to rape me to the tune of $50 for a data cable. Then I have to get proprietary software. So I don't use this functionality and never will.

      If some bright spark in the industry realized that they could win most of the market over by simply offering a "non evil" policy on parts, accessories and service. For example, if someone adopted the USB standard for charging and data transfer, I wouldn't ever have to buy this shit over every time I bought a cell phone. I realize that the ultra high-end has already adopted this but there should be a friggin' law that requires all phones to adopt this policy.

      But our government is run by big business so this will likely never happen.

      --
      More
    6. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by alexhohio · · Score: 0

      I agree with your point, however, I think your statement is accurate for many consumers for personal use, but not for business use. Salespeople and many other profs need their PDA to sync with their PIM. When a clamshell phone can sync with ACT or the like, then the PDA may not be needed, or would that mean the phone is a PDA?

      --
      Almost every Harvard student was High School Valedictorian- After a year of college, half are in the bottom of the class
    7. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 1

      what the fuck @ $50 data cable, I can walk into any dodgy phone shop and get a unbranded datacable for £5. Also does it have infra-red or bluetooth? both of which my laptop has so I don't even need a data cable.

    8. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by c1pher · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "It can do a few of them things, It does tell me the details field of my calender It can run vnc client If I had a gig sd card I could use it to store mp3s."

      uhh yeah, your little nokia can run a vnc client? i think not..even if it could, you're staring at a tiny little display of what 4 lines of like 12 characters per line maybe? ok. not to mention you're trying to type with a set of numbers representing letters (333 22 777 55 222 etc)

      and yes, you could store mp3s (but can your phone play them?) if you had a SD card, but as you said it you don't, no interface on that phone to do it. so no you can't.

      you can see contact details maybe, but again the screen is so damned small and youre scrolling constantly for every half a dozen words or so...very obnoxious too. With a pocketpc not only can you see a lot more, your desktop can automatically sync all your information from contacts, email, appointments, etc. over a cellular connection, if you've got a phone based pocketpc.

      basically you're comparing apples and oranges here with your phone and a PDA phone hybrid.

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
    9. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 1

      LOL fanboy,
      Yes it does have both an MP3 player and a video player so yes I could listen to them, otherwise what would be the point storing them.

      Here is the vnc client if you were wondering.

    10. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Organized+Konfusion · · Score: 1

      Also forgot to mention that it does have a memory card, It came free with a 32 mb card and I don't really need anything bigger. Syncing with a PIM is easy, it uses SyncML so it can be done anywhere over wap/gprs.

    11. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      It's important to distinguish between the three classes of "smartphones".

      Type one is the PDA with a phone in it; e.g. i-mate Jam, Treo 650, Sony P910i, Nokia 9500. How I distinguish these devices is that they have a big touch screen in them. They usually have had the form factor adjusted to make them look just like big phones. You need these if you expect to enter much info into the device - because you need handwriting recognition/graffitti/a QWERTY keyboard. This new Dell sounds like it will be one of these.

      Type two is the phone with a PDA in it; e.g. i-mate SPVC5000, Motorola MPX220, Nokia 7610. These devices have a phone sized non-touch screen, and entry is purely via the phone keyboard, but they have PDA software on them so you can upload apps and so on. Obviously, with the phone keypad the only way of entering text, these are much more read-only devices, but they are only slightly bigger than an ordinary phone (and usually smaller than the 3G phones here in the UK).

      Type 3 is the phone that isn't a smartphone, but has really good PIM applications, like your 6230. These devices are recognizable because (apart from Java games etc.) you cannot normally put a pile of third party apps on them.

      I was always a two-device man myself, but recently had an opportunity to test a Sendo X smartphone (type 2). I was impressed that it was just about useable for me; I missed being able to quickly scribble a note but it did everything else I need from a PDA. (and the text entry thing might be because I am old and so cannot do SMS text entry at 80 wpm like the kids today can!) In the end I rejected it as a device, but this was because of a bug in the phone app, not because it's PDA capabilities are lacking.

      So it looks like my next device will be integrated. I think a type 1 is what I need, given that I do occasionally scribble notes fast, but a type 2 + a "hipster PDA" would also meet my needs. Plus of course, my phone company will be subsidising the cost.

      This is why everyone predicts the PDA market is dying. With the early Treos and the Sony P800, the type 1's became good enough to start eating away at the high end of the market, and the low end is being nibbled away because everyone has type 3s anyway, and subsidised type 2s meet the low end market's needs very cheaply.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    12. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by trondaks · · Score: 1

      I am actually using my X50v more as a remote control. Made my own application to select music and movies from a library, adding them to a playlist, select what to play, position in the track, volume, get lyrics on the PDA for a song, get the album cover. Retrieve a sound or video stream, weather, and a lot of other things from my HTPC server.

      www.toothcontrol.com

    13. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Matt+Clare · · Score: 1

      I just installed BSD on my PDA!

      --
      .\.\att Clare
    14. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by chrisbtoo · · Score: 1

      Modulo the cellphone and camera bit (they used packet radio, though) Psion's PDAs were doing that sort of stuff 10 years ago. I believe (have to admit to not keeping in the loop) that since they sold off their interest in Symbian that's pretty much all that remains of Psion these days.

      --
      Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
    15. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not likely to happen. Dell isn't going to break into the bar code business when they have no cash register or industrial units. Their presence in that market is none and to break in you've got to have a whole solution. Not to mention the demand for units is very low. Leave this to the guys that have been doing it for years and charge appropriately for tank-like construction.

      No, I think "business" is just what we all think it means: A Blackberry replacement for executives and salespeople.

      Microsoft doesn't like RIM. The cell phone manufacturers don't like Microsoft. Solution: Dell will be Bill's bitch for 1.2% profit margins.

    16. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, I think "business" is just what we all think it means: A Blackberry replacement for executives and salespeople.

      Perspective is everything. As a distributor I think 'warehouse' when I hear the word business.
      We use axim X50s in our warehouse. The units cost 300$ plus 100$ for a three year warranty and another hundred for drop all insurance. That makes 500$ for the pda plus 150$ for an sdio bar code reader 650$ total. Symbols piece o'junk entry model is 1200$ without a service contract. That is why I go dell on PDA. I replace about 2 per year, under warranty

    17. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Contacts, small videos of your kids, some email. My PDA contains only these and i own a Dell Axim X5 !

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    18. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by rho · · Score: 1

      Beware wishing for a law--what would actually happen is that the gov't would require that you use ADA to program your phone, based on a blue-ribbon commission of tech-ignorant Senators.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    19. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful
      even the most basic of cell phones have had adequate PDA capabilities for years now. My Nokia 3588i certainly does. But I don't use it because Nokia wants to rape me to the tune of $50 for a data cable [nokiausa.com]. Then I have to get proprietary software. So I don't use this functionality and never will.

      I think you are right about the greed part but "adequate PDA capabilities"? I use a Palm Tungsten for a PDA (connected via bluetooth to my phone) and wouldn't dream that my Nokia would be able to replace it. Same with the Treos some of my friends have. I suppose it depends on your needs but my Nokia 6310i has (roughly) the same capabilities as your 3588i and it's utterly useless as a PDA. Why? Several reasons.
      1. You already touched on crappy, proprietary software. Nokia's software on the PC sucks. No really, it's horrifically bad. It barely works, has a crappy interface, doesn't integrate with the system unless you happen to be an Outlook user, and consumes lots of resources without really doing much of anything useful.
      2. Navigation. The screen size/fonts are not sized usefully for efficient navigation except for the simplest information. You can't usually see more than a 10 digit phone number which makes viewing addresses (email or otherwise) awkward. It's not bad for appointment notification but you can't use it because of the afformentioned crappy software.
      3. Interface. I have bluetooth and infrared with my Nokia which saves me the trouble of getting the overpriced data cable. But even then, I had to get a firmware update for Nokia's bluetooth to cooperate with my Thinkpad. The infrared worked fine but it doesn't matter because of point #1 (Nokia software = crappy) I don't even have a problem with them selling the cable separate but when they do sell you a cable, it's some absurd proprietary cable instead of firewire/usb which would be actually useful.
      4. Most importantly, Nokia doesn't care about end users much. You aren't their main customer, the carriers are. Most phones are subsidized by the carriers and it isn't really in the carrier's interest to pay for a phone with the added cost of a decent PDA type system they won't make any money from. They don't want to pay for the tech support, they don't want to pay for the development cost and they don't want to pay for hardware. The only thing they do want is enough PDA-like features so they can put it on a check list so that their competitors can't claim their phone does more.
    20. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The biggest use of a pda is to keep track of appointments, take notes, and hold contact information - all of which my nokia 6230 can do NOW! PDAs are dying."

      Heh. PDAs aren't going anywhere.

      1.) First generation pdas basically kept track of appts. Modern pdas are now becoming music/movie players as well as web browsers, thanks to 802.11.

      2.) Phones are too small. The larger screens of PDAs are more appealing for more productive stuff.

      3.) Though I agree that it's difficult to buy a PDA if you've got a phone like the 6230 (heck, *I* don't have a PDA because of my Nokia...) that's sort of like saying an internet appliance will replace computers. Won't happen. You might be able to buy a handy-dandy web surfing email sending machine, but the general-purposeness of PCs keep them afloat quite easily. PDAs are headed that way. Heck, these days you can buy a PDA with 3D acelleration, a 640 by 480 screen, 802.11, and a camera.

      Your phone's more useful, but phones aren't replacing PDAs any more than they are replacing digital cameras or the iPod.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Just because you can have sex with your dad does not mean it's as nice or easy as having sex with your mom. Trust me. I know your mom (and your dad).

    22. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is a 1 gig SD card cheap?

    23. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by RMH101 · · Score: 1

      in the UK, www.aria.co.uk have them for about 33 UKP plus VAT. how cheap do you want?

    24. Re:My phone can already do pda stuff by c1pher · · Score: 1

      ok smartass, i looked at the wrong phone model, but *again* when doing anything in vnc, or entering in data, you're typing input with 10 number keys, which is soooooo uhh..convenient i'm sure.

      --
      The Adult Happy Meal - "I'm lovin' it!"
  3. Great for Competition by pholower · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although this seems like a mistake, Dell may actually be able to encourage the market on cheaper smart phones. The article, if you read, went into absolutely no detail about the phone but one can assume it is a smartphone. With competitive forces like Dell (which seems to be all dell is good at as of late) Treo and Blackberry are going to have a run for their money. I am all for more choices and better competition in this market, but to whom will they offer their services will be the next question. Will it be a brand specific deal, or will they provide to the masses and make it available to all major carriers?

    --
    -- johntracy.com, because everybody else is wrong.
    1. Re:Great for Competition by stecoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your tickling one of my biggest gripes with cell phones today - carrier specific phones. Maybe one day the hardware will be powerful enough so that software will talk to whatever technology is used. A new technology arrives, great, get a software upgrade instead of new hardware. But this isn't specific to cell phones either - how many 802.11 technologies have you gone through?

    2. Re:Great for Competition by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Time will Tell if Yet Another MicroSoft Handheld will make a difference.
      For me, the Treo does all that, and, more, does not kowtow to Redmond.
      Fight the power.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  4. Great by extra+the+woos · · Score: 1

    now we can enjoy that famous dell quality and rebranding of other people's products in phones, tool...with my old university's experience with the poor quality of their laptops I just gotta wonder why so many institutions buy them

    --
    replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's the "manager" type that only does what the manager types in Dell, Inc. market them to do.

    2. Re:Great by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I have a ton of clients who use Dell and Dell only. They bring us a ton of business, because of the shoddy quality of the equipment.

      I have one major client that only used Dell that we've switched to the labelled brand my shop sells (assembled by our local wholesaler, but we handpick the parts, even on the notebooks.) No problems yet with hardware failures, but we also use all real Intel motherboards for them. Yes, I'm sure we could assemble them ourselves, but this saves so much time, and doesn't cost anymore on our side. And in the long run, the company is actaully saving a lot of money on the systems. The cost per system is a bit lower than they were receiving from Dell yet the quality is a ton higher. They also have two layers of support for the machines. We're the actually reseller, so they have us, and even though the wholesaler doesn't sell to the public, they provide support. Oh, and all the machines come with a standard 3 year warranty on parts and labor.

      I'm typing this as we speak on one of their notebooks, actually. My brand new Athlon 64 3000+, and I love every second of it. Linux is going on it later today.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    3. Re:Great by menace3society · · Score: 1
      I just gotta wonder why so many institutions buy them

      'Cause their cheap and institutions (like many people) are greedy SOB's who only care about money, and are willing to sacrifice any amount of quality for even the smallest decrease in price?

      Just a guess.

    4. Re:Great by releppes · · Score: 1

      I'll agree with the shotty equiptment complaint, however you get what you pay for. I too use to build custom machines out of quality hardware. Granted, I didn't build that many, but one thing was true: The lifespan of a custom machine wasn't that much longer than a cheap premade.

      In general, a custom machine ran around $1500 and a typical lifespan was around 4-5 years. My last (and most quality machine) only lasted 2 years. It was a large disappointment and a learning lesson too. Bang for the buck just didn't pay off.

      I recently bought a dell for my brother. $350 bucks got him a 2.8GHz, 80Gb HD, 17" LCD screen. Shit, the panel alone costs about $200. With a few minor upgrades like CD/DVD RW and 512Mb RAM plus taxes, his final bill was only $465 (that's with the taxes and delivery!). Granted, you could build a custom machine, but for that money it's too hard to beat.

      Myself, I bought an Inspirion 6000 laptop, 15" widescreen with wireless G, 512Mb RAM. In general, I nice machine and with taxes and all totaled, it was under $650.

      Granted, maybe we bought crap. Maybe it'll die in a year or two. But for that money, it'll be time to upgrade. My live and learn was that the quality doesn't matter too much when the technology changes that fast. The state of the art machine I build two years ago for over 4 times the money (and is now dead) just doesn't compair.

      In short, you get what you pay for and it depends on your long term strategy. I figure I can't afford a custom powerhouse every few years, but for the cheap prices at dell, I can afford a new machine upgrade every now and then. Personally, I hate the throw away society we live it, but the economy has pushed me into it.

    5. Re:Great by dlZ · · Score: 1

      I agree that we're living in a throw away society, and I always try to squeeze that extra live out of old machines (I have an old HP a customer just left at the shop after purchasing a new machine I'm using as a Linux box to teach myself about Apache, for example.) And true, most machines are obsolete in just a few years.

      In the case of this client, the machines will be used well past their prime. Most of the work done on them consists of MS Office, web browsing, e-mail, etc. The hardest thing on them is working in Access. So machines that'll last reliably for 4-5 years was a major concern in the purchasing. When they bought from Dell, they went with mid to high range systems, which tended to die in a year or two. They still have a few they use in one of their offices, both P3s, which still do what they need. But at this point, out of the order of 15 machines, only 2 are surviving, and one of them likes to shut down on it's own once in awhile. Luckily this office is nice and far away, so I don't get called over every time it happens. This is just one order, there are whole orders that at this point have been retired to the junk yard, including two servers.

      I can't argue with those prices, but one of the highlights of a new desktop machine is assembling it. I even buy the notebook shells once in awhile and throw them together myself. I enjoy the activity, though, so that's a large driving factor in it.

      --
      rm -rf ./evidence @ punkcomp
    6. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two words "Complete Care". Dell is about the only mfgr. that will repace broken LCD screens under warranty. The company I have been at for the last 5 years has not seen the massive h/w failures that some posters seem to indicate is the norm.

  5. Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful
    While I understand Dell's decision to get into the cellphone business, it has to be said this marks the beginning of a potentially worrying trend. Dell is the biggest manufacturer of commodity PC hardware in the world, and cellphones are also going in that direction. While that might seem a good thing, remember that the commoditization of the PC industry essentially sucked the innovation from it. PCs have gotten faster, but for the most part, there hasn't been a surprise, a new way of doing things, in PCs and in personal computing, since the early nineties.

    What we may be seeing is the start of essentially the phone clones. Imagine the offerings from most of the large manufacturers being essentially identical, perhaps three or four models, all looking broadly the same as their competitors equivalents, differing from competitors by battery life, probably running the same firmware. You might get the basic no-frills phone, similar to a Nokia 61xx series, a slightly more advanced colour phone with a camera, a PDA phone that's literally a pen-based PDA with GSM/UMTS built-in, and an expensive slimline phone. That's the future of phones, much as every PC manufacturer produces essentially low-end and high-end PC-clones, differing from competitors by case colour, and laptops.

    From a technologists standpoint, it's also depressing. Phones remain a relatively closed platform, with only limited opening up in the form of the occasional J2ME implementation, usually badly implemented and slow, or Symbian/WinCE platform, both of which are designed to be as closed as the phone manufacturer chooses. The idea of being able to get independent development environments, independent convertors and compilers (on an off-topic note: why do we now call compilers "linkers" and use the word "compiler" to refer to code converters? That's just dumb. I used to think it was only tech-illiterates that used it that way around, but it's slipped into normal usage. People: It's a "C convertor", not a "C compiler". You can't get language compilers, compilers compile - Compile (tr.v): To put together or compose from materials gathered from several sources: compile an encyclopedia - object code to produce executables) so people can create new software for their phones and make them genuinely friendly to them is unlikely, and probably going to become less likely the more phones become commodities. In some ways that's ironic, as the opposite happened to personal computing, but in personal computing people were directly buying PCs rather than trying to get them from phone service companies.

    Will this essentially be the end of the diversity we see from Nokia's 9xxx series to the Treo to all manner of other technologies? I hope not, but I fear Dell wouldn't be interested if the industry wasn't going in this direction. If it happens, expect Nokia and Sony Ericsson to become also-rans, or else shadows of their former selves, to the Nokias and SEs of today what HP was to the HP of old.

    I guess, whatever else, time will tell.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    1. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by amichalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While that might seem a good thing, remember that the commoditization of the PC industry essentially sucked the innovation from it.

      Cheers to that statement! I believe it is because the obvious competetive advantage in any market is price. You can always try to sell the same thing as your neighbor for $1 less and try to gain market share. Thinking differently and actually innovating is risky because if people don't like your innovation, you wasted R&D and manufacturing on a product you have to discount to sell. So the safe thing is to cut into your margins or try to gain operational efficiencies and economies of scale to offer lower prices a la Dell and Walmart.

      PCs have gotten faster, but for the most part, there hasn't been a surprise, a new way of doing things, in PCs and in personal computing, since the early nineties.

      I am not so certain this is try. Check out what the last ten years have brought us:
      - common usage of PDAs/Treos/Blackberries
      - alternative 'entertainment' usage for PCs as the home music/video server

      I do believe that the market is stagnating because it is presided over by large vendors (Dell/HP/IBM/Toshiba) who don't innovate, they duplicate while improving efficiencies to lower cost. In both of the markets above (just like HP has the iPaq) I think we will see more of the big vendors getting into things. Don't believe me, just Google for how many people are loving the Mac mini in their entertainment center at home and Apple doesn't even have a movie store yet!

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    2. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Have you shopped for cell phones lately? I'd say we're already there. Heck, most phones won't work with all carriers, and manufatruers will make carrier specific models. It's not like you can go buy a phone, then chose your provider. A bunch of buy-'em-cheap clones might be the only force great enough to change that model here in the US. Otherwise, it's vendor lock-in and data-crippled phones forever. (What do you mean my new 810 has a USB port, but the only way to get multimedia is via a wireless pay service? *evil laugherter in background*)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While that might seem a good thing, remember that the commoditization of the PC industry essentially sucked the innovation from it.

      I could be wrong, but it's quite possible that your cause and effect are reversed. I believe that the commoditization is occurring because there are fewer innovations to be made.

      That's not to say there won't be advances, but for the most part, the available hardware (even the low end stuff) suits the wants and needs of the vast majority of the market.

      I'm a software developer, so I appreciate a fast machine, but even I am quite content with a Dell 4700 with 512MB RAM and a single SATA drive that came with an 19" LCD for $650. I couldn't justify spending upwards of $1500 for a pc with SCSI, Xeons, and a Gig or more of RAM just to shave a minute or two off my compile time. /Knows how to use compile time wisely i.e. flirt with secretary

    4. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by ultimabaka · · Score: 1

      While that might seem a good thing, remember that the commoditization of the PC industry essentially sucked the innovation from it.

      You must have missed the article just below this one...you know...the quantum computing one about the teeny holes? The innovation is certainly there, and people are spending money to research these things. But companies ought to be allowed to try and make money on the technologies that already exist.

      To say nothing about the fact that commoditizing (that can't possibly be a word...) phones may actual lead to STANDARDS that actually WORK from phone to phone. Just as one example, jeez, sometimes I think there are actually hundreds of unique "gaming systems" on the market, since games on one phone never seem to work on another. It's awful, and maybe some streamlining could actually work.

    5. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by Cyn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Any phone will work with any carrier, so long as they are using the same base technology. You can't use a GSM phone on a CDMA network - nor can you use a dual band european GSM phone on an american GSM network. This is less and less an issue as more and more phones are becoming tri or quad band (There are four GSM bands, 850/900/1800/1900).

      You *can* buy a cellphone and use it with any carrier - what you can't do is buy a cellphone for pennies after rebate ... without a big 1 or 2 year contract. That's just the way it is in the US, the carriers set it up so that cellphones have no value, and their value is subsidized by a big early cancellation fee on a 1 or 2 year contract.

      Elsewhere, you buy your phone and get your service - and there's actual proper competition. If you don't like your service, you leave.

      Incidentally, carriers locking these phones to only work on their network is complete bullshit. You're buying the phone alongside the contract, and then getting a rebate. If they want to lock the phone to them, then you shouldn't be "paying full price and then getting a rebate". I've had mixed experiences with this - my t68i with Tmobile doesn't work with my current Cingular plan, but my v600 with Cingular (currently) was able to swap SIMs with my coworkers v600 with Tmobile [his similarly worked, but he needed to enter an access code to connect to Cingulars network - which is undoubtedly stored in my phone somewhere]. From what I've read, it's still quite common practice to lock them.

      --
      cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    6. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by twifosp · · Score: 1
      While you make interesting points, I don't think that the heavy manufactures (Dell, HP, ect) have much to do with this.

      The fact is, and as you pointed out, these companies just assemble the computers. They don't do their own R&D. They rely on technology component companies R&D and they just create the sum of the parts, the computer.

      While this is commodization, it's not as bad as you make it out to be. See the forrest for the trees. Each component that goes into the computer has gone through R&D by the company that made it. The processor, the video card, the motherbaords, everything.

      You can also argue that the hardware market doesn't even need any innovation right now. The software market is far behind taking advantage of the newest architechtures.

      When the market decides it's time for hardware innovation it won't be stifled by large commoditized companies. If anything, the opposite will occur. Once intel/ati/ect decide to innovate the markets, it's Dell's job to provide that hardware as fast as possible to consumers. And the more consumer market there is for a particular hardware architecture, the more software adoption you'll see. The more software adoption you'll see, the more hardware innovation will be required to support the ever increasing demands of software. And so goes the circle. Case in point, it may seem slow, but look at how fast 64 bit is actually being adopted compared to previous major architecture changes. It is because of market saturation.

      Either way, I tend to disagree with your assessment. You're looking at Dell as a PC maker. They are really just a supplier with a really solid business model and sucessful marketing techniques. Just because the company badge on the PC didn't do the R&D, doesn't mean it wasn't done.

      Basically, in conclusion, I'd say that "commodity market spam companies" (my term) are actually a GOOD thing to keep the markets from stagnating.

    7. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      I'm a software developer, so I appreciate a fast machine, but even I am quite content with a Dell
      No wonder you posted AC. Bwhahahah!
    8. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by Mars+Saxman · · Score: 1

      on an off-topic note: why do we now call compilers "linkers" and use the word "compiler" to refer to code converters? That's just dumb. I used to think it was only tech-illiterates that used it that way around, but it's slipped into normal usage.

      As long as I have been paying attention to computers, which is about twenty years now, "compiler" has referred to a program that converts source code from a higher- to a lower-level language, and "linker" has referred to a program which stitches bits of object code together into an executable file. I suppose it's possible that you are a genuine old-timer, and that your recollection of the word's meaning predates mine *and* that of anyone who has ever bothered to write any of the computer-terms dictionaries I know about, but I think it more likely that you simply misunderstand the origins of the term.

      Yes, the plain-English definition of the verb "to compile" does sound more like what a linker does than what a modern compiler does, but that wasn't always the case. The original, 1950s-era notion of a compiler was more like what we would think of as a macro expander. The idea was that programmers would type statements representing higher-level actions, that each of these actions would represent some block of machine instructions, and that the "compiler" would create a program by slapping all these prefabbed bits of machine instructions together in order. It thus "compiled" a program out of fragments, much as someone would (for example) compile a dictionary out of individual definitions.

      Across half a century's distance, of course, things change. The technical term "compiler" began referring to the job that the program did, not the mechanism used to perform it. The programs that do that job are now vastly more complex than they once were, and it's hard to find any resemblance in their mechanism to the English-language notion of "compilation", but we still call them "compilers" because that's what we have always called programs that do that job.

      In any case, the definition of "compiler" as a program that converts from one language to another is most certainly the standard and accepted one. I work on development tools for a living, and when I am discussing programs that translate code with my colleagues, or reading about them in books or articles, "compiler" is always the term used, and this is not a recent development.

    9. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by hubrix · · Score: 0

      WRONG!!!! Sprint will not activate any phone without a Sprint logo on it!!!!

      --
      Screw realty just hook me up another monitor!
    10. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by amliebsch · · Score: 1

      He also missed the point that making things, even commodity things, ever cheaper and cheaper is itself a form of innovation.

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    11. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by sv0f · · Score: 1

      I am not so certain this is try. Check out what the last ten years have brought us:
      - common usage of PDAs/Treos/Blackberries


      The rise of this market was independent of anthing happening in the PC (i.e., Wintel) world.

    12. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by amichalo · · Score: 1

      The rise of this market was independent of anthing happening in the PC (i.e., Wintel) world.

      I disagree. THe PC world brought us the digital communication era. It was the need to have email, calendaring, and contacts available from a remote (palm top) device that made PDAs/Treos/Blackberries even possible.

      If this were not the case, then why was the Apple Newton an ultimate failure, though the Palm devices ignited the market? (hint: Newton was introduced before the availability of the information noted above.)

      --
      I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    13. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by Eminence · · Score: 2, Interesting
      • While that might seem a good thing, remember that the commoditization of the PC industry essentially sucked the innovation from it. PCs have gotten faster, but for the most part, there hasn't been a surprise, a new way of doing things, in PCs and in personal computing, since the early nineties.

      Nothing strange in that. Commoditization is normal in anything that ceases to be high tech, bleeding edge. IT & computers aren't bleeding edge anymore. Period.

      And this is not totally bad and doesn't mean there is no innovation. Let's take cars as a very good example of the same trends. Yes, cars ceased to be innovative some 80 years ago - every major component of a car was invented before the II World War begun including automatic transmissions and car radios. But no one could argue that there is no improvement between a car of today and car from late thirties, even despite the fact that basically well... they do the same thing. And probably someone from the period could easily adapt to driving the modern version (as controls for example didn't change at all).

      The plus side to this is that, environmental concerns aside, everyone now can have a car and all the freedom of movement and ease of moving stuff it gives.

      Same with computers. Yes, all PCs do more or less the same thing. Yes, they are ugly, run Windows but are cheap. But everyone can afford them. It's great!

      And if you demand something different and on a higher level there is still Porsche and Apple.

    14. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Price. Newtons were always relatively expensive, high three digits.

      The big selling point of the Palms was that they were much, much, lower in price, at their peak the majority were priced in the $100-200 range.

      That's all. Nothing to do with "digital communication", it's not as if the majority of people use their Palms to compose emails or browse the web.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    15. Re:Commodity phones, the end of innovation? by sv0f · · Score: 1

      I disagree. The Newton failed for a number of well-known reasons. It was too expensive, too large, the hand-writing recognition software was not good enough, and it only interacted well with an economically marginally platform. Palm -- started by ex-Newton employees -- solved all of these problems. The generations of the Palm that gained market share worked as well or better with Macs as PCs.

      The PC was the industry-standard platform, but it doesn't get credit for all independent technological inventions of the late 1980s, 1990s, and early 2000s. Would you credit the innovation of laser printers to the PC as well? The web browser? Of course, these new technologies had to inter-operate with the dominant computer platform, Wintel, to gain marketshare. But that platform did not spur their invention. The same is true of PDAs.

      Keep in mind that this exchange exists in a thread about how the commodization of the PC market has slowed innovation dramatically. I believe this is true. But a corollary is that any new invention, if it's to gain marketshare, must inter-operate with PCs, at least in the short-term and intermediate term. Hence iTunes for the PC and iPods that interact well with that platform, even though they were hatched in other, more innovative environments.

  6. Wow by mattmentecky · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A company already entrenched in a saturated market (hardware/computer retailer), branching out into an even more saturated market (cell phones)? Sounds like a winning plan there.

    1. Re:Wow by lbmouse · · Score: 1

      The markets may be somewhat saturated, but for Dell to keep the Axim competitive, they have to move it into the mobile market as handheld gadgets converge. The only other choice would be drop the product.

    2. Re:Wow by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't think that Dell has any experience dominating a saturated market through business efficiency, do you?

    3. Re:Wow by sjofi · · Score: 1

      The problem with this particular saturated market is that the existing players are already more efficient than Dell...

    4. Re:Wow by swb · · Score: 1

      Are they? Since they don't sell PCs and Dell hasn't sold phones, we don't really know how true that is.

  7. iPod Cell Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is what im waiting for :-) Darn carriers wont let it happen cause there all starting there own music stores :-(

    1. Re:iPod Cell Phone by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 1
      I'm thinking the same thing with the Dell phone. Personally, my ancient Handspring PDA died a few months ago, so I got a new phone with PDA features. It's not as nice as the PDA (needs expensive cable to sync with Outlook, less memory, fewer features, less software available), but it does the job ok. To my surprise, T9 is a much faster text input method than the stylus on my Visor.

      The one thing I wish it did besides being a better PDA is music playing. I'd like a phone that took a CF or SD card full of MP3 or WMA files and was able to play them, but it seems that's the realm of $$$ PDA phones that I can't afford. Since Dell is so notably good at driving prices down, I have hopes that I may be able to get a music playing Dell phone.

      --

      Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
      whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
      --Proverbs 9:7
  8. X30 discontinued by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wonderful!
    Now if I'm lucky enough and USPS stops to bounce my pda around Europe I'll get it some days before it gets obsolete...

  9. Good finaly compete with HP phones by johnjones · · Score: 2, Insightful

    HP phones are good but they are VERY expensive

    its a no brainer for dell as intel provides the hardware and MS the OS

    its what all the support + blackberry people want as you can actually get decent applications written for them

    dont cripple them dell allow any sim card to be put in and they will sell by the bucket load

    bluetooth (for headphones) and wifi(for corp data) a must

    I hope they come to the UK market

    regards

    John Jones

    1. Re:Good finaly compete with HP phones by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      there are already other phones. o2 xda 2 or 3 for example (htc himalaya/magician)

      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
  10. Dell support by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Funny

    The new phone comes with an outsourced # key that connects you directly with their outsourced technical support. Only $4.99 per minute, press 1 for partial-English, all others please hold for the next available representative.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  11. dell support by primefactor159 · · Score: 1

    heres how its going to go down dell "thank you for calling dell my name is todd how can i help you" customer "yeah i think my battery is dead" dell "have you tried a system restore" customer "what!? no?" dell "well you need to do that if not it sounds like you need a new hard drive" customer "how is that even remotely possible!?........fine send me the hard drive"

  12. standard Intel dogma. by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Well, assuming Dell keeps up with its current trend, they will be including an Intel chip inside this future one. Not that Intel chips are bad, but it seems everything they build has an Intel chip in it!

  13. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Great...Now I'm going to have to listen to geeks talking about how they upgraded from a cellphone to a dellphone.

    1. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I can understand the dilemma of technically challenged like yourself. Next time I'll try to dumb it down...

    2. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cept, real geeks don't use dell. =p

  14. You typed a lot, said little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Practicing for a commentator position in a tech magazine?

    1. Re:You typed a lot, said little. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you, Mr. AC Instapundit said nothing. Just a jab at someone because you are a corporate shill for Dell. so how baked are you right now Duuuude? Only time will tell.

  15. Unlocked by petecarlson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All they need to do is sell them unlocked with 802.11b data and VoIP support. At first they will cost a boatload, but it will help push other manufacturers away from carrier lock in. If anyone can supply data services, I see an entire new market for WiFi to the phone.
    If I could cover most of your city with WiFi, would you pay $10 a month for unlimited data at 1MB/s to your phone?

    1. Re:Unlocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely sure how you might implement VoIP into a cellphone, but as for 802.11b/g(/a?) I don't see why it has to cost a boatload. We're talking about a device that already, by definition, has a radio transmitter/receiver built in. Keep that in mind. Not the mention that even video game systems have WiFi these days. Both the PSP and the NintendoDS have a form of it. In fact, I'll be amazed if the next true generation of phones doesn't have that capability.

    2. Re:Unlocked by petecarlson · · Score: 1

      It would cost more because:
      0) It is a high end device with more chips in a small form factor.

      1) The cost would not be subsidized by cell phone companies as is the case with most cell phones.

      2) More reasons I can't think of because I was up all night working... And reading Slashdot.

  16. I will wait... by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    for the iPhone.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  17. Me no Under stand by crazy_pikachu · · Score: 1

    we don't need to have dell in cell phones too my grandma is already having a hard enough time trying to understand the foreigners on the other end already now when she buys the cell phone she has to listen to them again. Well at least we know that dell just wants out money and not wanting to put jobs in the America

    1. Re:Me no Under stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yep, blame the guy who is outside of America. It definitely is his fault. What I don't understand is why can't an American company produce a cell phone worth a fuck?

    2. Re:Me no Under stand by crazy_pikachu · · Score: 1

      the point I was getting at is that I am blaming dell for there crummy support line. I dont blame the people in other countrys for takeing a job I am blameing dell for there mixed english tech support

    3. Re:Me no Under stand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your grandma cant understand foreigner's english, maybe she should buy HP....i will take Dell's cheaper products for a little slouchy tech support...just like most educational institutions and businesses are....also, the last time i called Dell, i got a rep who was in US, no Indian accent.. Anyway, this reminds me of when i heard a guy complaining that he couldnt understand the "foreigner's" accent....it turned out that the "foreigner" was actually born and brought-up in New York.....go figure..

    4. Re:Me no Under stand by Scootesti · · Score: 1

      Not that I heard this from a reliable source or anything. But Dell is supposedly pulling a lot of it's software support out of the middle east(now that it's name has been battered and dragged through the mud). Much of it is going to out-sourced companies in North America (Like SiTel, right here in Ottawa, Ontario) and becoming a subscription-based service with people who speak english (of all things).

      --
      "So, Lone Starr, now you see that evil will always triumph, because good is dumb." - Dark Helmet
  18. Finally by Jeremy.DeGroot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This could be what finally gets me to buy a cell phone. I've held out on phones because they don't do enough else to make me buy one (or they can do things like calendar and note-taking, but I prefer in interface of my day planner), and I've held out on PDAs because they're expensive and also aren't superior to my day planner. But if Dell markets a well-designed phone with serious computing power and a good interface, that may be the killer app that finally drags me kicking and screaming into the market. Here's hoping they can sell real multi-function phones with the quality and price that they've been providing computers at.

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No cell phone and no pda? You sure you don't have them cause there's nobody who wants to call you?

    2. Re:Finally by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Eh? You don't want a PDA, because you prefer paper. OK, that's fine. Paper is a very useful and underrated PDA technology; backups are tricky and it has capacity issues, but it is very versatile and you can't beat that cost/price ratio.

      But you don't want a cellphone because it isn't a good enough PDA? That's daft. You don't want a PDA, remember?

      Unless what you want is a GPRS internet access device... is that it?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    3. Re:Finally by Jeremy.DeGroot · · Score: 1

      I won't buy a phone, because it's just a phone. I won't buy a PDA because it doesn't do anything that I want to do better than a day planner. I do want a PDA, I just have historically tended to favor paper ones (I guess you'd call those PPAs). I'm not closed to the idea of changing platforms, though.

    4. Re:Finally by biglig2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Who could ask for anything fairer? Here's some notes to help you on your way:

      PDA is better than paper because::

      You can back it up to your PC or memory card

      It can play music, video, video games (though you can put paper games into a Paper device. I like sudoku myself)

      Easier to read when it is dark.

      It can store a lot of info in a small space - you can load a memory card with a hundred e-books if you want.

      You can get connectivity for it and use it to surf the web (poorly), check your e-mail, ssh to your box, etc.

      Syncronises with your PC's PIM.

      It can sound alarms.

      Paper is better than PDA because

      Very cheap.

      Wider rage of form-factors. (Compare a pad of small post-its, a hipster PDA (which is a dozen index cards and a bulldog clip, for those not familiar with it), a moleskine notebook, a A4 ring-bound pad, a filofax, a big portfolio, etc. etc.)

      Survives water, drops etc. better

      Never runs out of batteries

      Parts easier to obtain

      Easier to read in bright sunlight.

      Much easier to personalise (e.g. by printing your own inserts that match your exact needs)

      You can tear pages out and give them to people, stick them on the wall, etc.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    5. Re:Finally by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      PalmOne Treo 600 or 650 (600 is a reasonable price, but maybe more than everyone wants to pay, 650 I would call expensive) will serve your needs nicely, today. You don't have to wait for Dell to figure out exactly how much they can charge and get you to pay (hint: it'll be comperable to a Treo today).

  19. I will buy one on one condition: by millennial · · Score: 2, Funny

    They must bring back that pothead to do the commercials. Dell is nothing without him.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:I will buy one on one condition: by menace3society · · Score: 1

      You could have left off the last two words there.

  20. Good by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Having just had my life cruelly shattered in the realisation that the Sony Ericsson P910 is neither a good phone or a good PDA, I'm actually glad that Microsoft is expanding into the smartphone market through Dell.

    So far, my current P910 thinks that closing the flip means I'm done, doesn't syncronise with Outlook properly (all my mobile numbers are labelled as work), runs dog slow, can't call up numbers quickly to dial them, the keyboard doesn't suggest words, no quick way to enter a capital letter (no swipe-up movement like with Microsoft), inconsistent GUI including a complete failure to sort my applications by anything resembling alphabetically.

    Sure, the PocketPC phone editions have their issues too (random bugs requiring a restart, pitiful Outlook support, poor ActiveSync which often has problems syncing an appointment for an "unspecified error") but with Microsoft snapping a the heels, hopefully the quality bar will increase.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Good by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Not to be a Palm OS fanboy or anything but why have you limited your choices to Symbian and PocketPC OS? Believe it or not when equipped with the right apps, the Palm OS syncs with desktop MS software better than Microsoft's own PocketPC products.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Good by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
      Not to be a Palm OS fanboy or anything but why have you limited your choices to Symbian and PocketPC OS?

      Sadly, the main reason is that the Treo is only available in the UK on Orange and I'm not on them :(

      Believe it or not when equipped with the right apps, the Palm OS syncs with desktop MS software better than Microsoft's own PocketPC products.

      Very true, although in order to achieve better syncing (I'm assuming KeyContacts and the ilk) you have to use an application which maintains seperate databases for the contacts, diary, tasks and notes. Unfortunately this has the nasty side effect or meaning that every other application that reads and writes data to and from those standard databases breaks immediately unless the authors include support for the newer formats.

      A shame really, but then IMHO the pace of innovation in the Palm camp has been very little since the Vx so it's not much of a suprise.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    3. Re:Good by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Aren't capitals done in Symbian by writing at the to of the screen rather than the bottom?

      And closing the flip seems to me to be a sensible signal that "I am finished with the PDA, switching back to phone mode now". I'm rather taken with the idea of a device that focuses on being a phone when I tell it to.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  21. Bored! Bored! Bored! Boooooored! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I couldn't think of a less exciting headline.

    I switched on a business show on Fox News just deal with it, OK? They have decent business shows.) over the weekend, and the announcer, in his "what's coming up next" blurb, excitedly said, "you'll be able to watch television on your cell phone soon!" And all I can think about is how intercell handoffs still vastly suck even here in 2005 A.D, half my cell calls sound like they are from a deep sea submersible and how there's still dead zones even in metropolitan Los Angeles.

    Why am I supposed to be excited about this? Where's the truly NEW stuff? Say what you will about Tivo, but that was a device that fundamentally changed the way I do things in terms of entertainment. I actually watch less TV more efficiently because of it. I want things that make my life easier, not flashy gadgets that are created simply for the gee-whiz factor.

    Maybe I've seen too much. Maybe it's because I design stuff so far beyond things like this that I'm difficult to impress. I dunno... just getting old and pragmatic, perhaps.

  22. Gah! No! Do not even speak his name! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 0
    They must bring back that pothead to do the commercials.

    I dunno... if they do that I might have to issue a fatwa against them. Bringing back that tool to the airwaves is total jihad time.

  23. Note by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    Dell recommends Microsoft® Windows® XP Professional (it says so on their handhelds page) and offers only Intel® XScale(TM) processors in their handhelds.

    1. Re:Note by argent · · Score: 1

      and offers only Intel® XScale(TM) processors in their handhelds

      Much as I like bashing Dell, since Intel bought the StrongARM technology from DEC the Pocket PC processor naturally followed. It's not like Dell or even Microsoft is deliberately picking Intel here, they actually picked DEC and DEC sold the business to Intel.

  24. That's not the problem. by numbski · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is that most cell phones aren't sold at what they're worth. They are sold at a loss, the price being subsidised by the major carriers. This is why the iPod phone between Apple and Motorola is being delayed. No one wants to subsidize it, becase the carriers are being greedy.

    As I see it right now, Apple could sell a GPRS phone outright with no problems. Plug in a sim card and you're good to go. The problem is, most people aren't willing to shell out $600 for a phone. $300, maybe, but not $600.

    Sprint ("The first to build our own, all digital network from the ground up.") and CDMA technology is stagnating, and to make matters worse, you can't use just any CDMA phone, you have to use one they've approved.

    The main reason I'm looking to move to a GPRS carrier when my contract is up. I want a bluetooth phone that will nicely sync with iSync, and for extra credit I want either a native imap client (not a java one, that's what I use now) or native ssh. My Sony-Ericson, Sprint forsaken phone is buggy as all get out. I can't even answer a phone call while in hands-free mode. The call gets garbled. :(

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:That's not the problem. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      If Apple built the functionality into an iPod, then I can see people paying $600 for the thing, possibly even more. The key is making a unit that happens to be a phone where the unit itself is clearly worth the money. If it's just a phone, then, yeah, nobody would pay for that. If it's something more...

      One thing I think a manufacturer like Apple might be interested in is teaming up with a wireless company and pre-installing a widely supported UMTS implementation in something like an iMac or Mac mini, and the company's laptops. "It just works" goes as far as being a basic matter of buying the Mac from the store, including a credit card to be billed a monthly $50 Internet access fee, you get home, and the entire machine is already set up, Internet access and everything.

      The major networks have to get their networks upgraded to make this happen, but I don't see why it shouldn't. And I bet they'd be willing to subsidize the cost of such a PC too so the extra functionality doesn't add much to the price.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:That's not the problem. by stecoop · · Score: 2, Informative

      The problem is that most cell phones aren't sold at what they're worth.

      I have to disagree. The market dictates the value of the product. In fact, I think the subsidy from the carriers is causing the price of cell phone prices to be inflated. Think about it; that would buy a cell phone for 600+ dollars? No one, I can get a fully functional handheld computer and kick in the transceiver for that price.

      CDMA technology is stagnating

      CDMA is very popular in Asian markets and they have streaming videophones. GSM is in the European market and I would guess that CDMA to GSM ratio worldwide is close to 50% if not tilted to the CDMA a little. Which technology is better? I think CDMA is a little better; however, I think that neither is quite perfect. Some years from now, A common technology will bridge the two and the war will be over and maybe perfection?

    3. Re:That's not the problem. by Andyvan · · Score: 1

      CDMA is very popular in Asian markets and they have streaming videophones. GSM is in the European market and I would guess that CDMA to GSM ratio worldwide is close to 50% if not tilted to the CDMA a little. Which technology is better? I think CDMA is a little better; however, I think that neither is quite perfect. Some years from now, A common technology will bridge the two and the war will be over and maybe perfection?


      1) The CDMA to GSM ratio is nowhere close to 1. There are way more GSM phones.

      2) The "common technology" is called WCDMA.

      -- Andyvan

    4. Re:That's not the problem. by rho · · Score: 1
      I want a bluetooth phone that will nicely sync with iSync, and for extra credit I want either a native imap client (not a java one, that's what I use now) or native ssh.

      Let me save you some time: what you're looking for does not exist if you're a T-Mobile customer. I've done gobs of research into this, and I've come up empty. What I wanted was:

      • A phone with BT that I could sync with iSync, and use as a GPRS modem with my Powerbook or with a Palm (see below)
      • A Palm handheld with BT that I could use as a tiny computer for SSH, Web, mail while I'm away from my desktop or laptop

      The Palm was easy--the new Tungsten E2 looks perfect--nice screen, long battery life (important!), not stupidly expensive so I won't cry like a girl when I drop it in the toilet, and will be supported by the Enfora WiFi portfolio soon (or the Palm WiFi SD card, if you want).

      The phone has been a real pain. I'd like to be able to use the phone as an emergency SSH terminal as well, so I thought the Nokia 6822 would be perfect. But it's not a US phone. I had hopes for the Motorola A630, but unless you're willing to muck around in the Java libraries, it's locked out of ports other than 80. The Sidekick doesn't have BT. Neither does the 6800. The Motorola v600 looked decent, but they just recently removed it from their Web site, so it's obviously end-of-life.

      Plus, T-Mobile has limited their t-zones to WAP only. If you want real Internet, you have to get the $20/mo Internet add-on. (A good deal, actually the best on the market, but I'm not thrilled about the price considering the speed seems to be about the same as a 28.8Kbps modem, but with 800-1000ms ping times. Hello lag!)

      All the phones are either A) candy-coated pieces of crap designed to appeal to texting shitheads and Japanese girls, or; B) ungodly expensive. Hello, who gives a crap about a camera on their phone? There is no way it will be anything other than a shitty, shitty camera. I couldn't care less about being able to use a P.Diddy song as a ringtone. (God, ringtones? Eat a dick, you assholes who obsess over ringtones.) I want a camera with BUTTONS that I can ACUTALLY PRESS, that don't look like SHIT (Nokia 7610).

      The phones supported by iSync are all pretty old. The Sony t610/616 and the Nokia 3650 are probably the best of the lot, but they're long ago discontinued.

      The situation is pretty bleak.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    5. Re:That's not the problem. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      WCDMA is the use of Code Division Multiple Access (ie the raw technology, not the Qualcomm variant, though Qualcomm has co-developed it) with UMTS (UMTS is, essentially, "GSM2", and isn't limited to a single air-interface technology), so it doesn't represent a convergance.

      Unfortunately, people are often using WCDMA and UMTS interchangably, which makes it hard to understand what's going on. But essentially, WCDMA is a technology (optionally) used by UMTS. It has little to do with Qualcomm's IS-95 standard CDMA, whose "Version 2" variant is called cdma2000.

      Apologies for the pedantary!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:That's not the problem. by stecoop · · Score: 1

      I just looked up the static of GSM and CDMA users. The site said that GSM adds more customers per year than the total number of CDMA users. But it did go on to say that GSM claims TDMA and SMS as users.

      I just wonder what direction China will go?

    7. Re:That's not the problem. by Andyvan · · Score: 1
      Ok, I'm confused.

      If WCDMA is using CDMA with "GSM2", how does it differ from a convergence?

      I understood the original poster to want the ability to change providers easily, combined with the superior efficiency of CDMA. Doesn't WCDMA provide that? -- Andyvan

    8. Re:That's not the problem. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      No, it doesn't use CDMA, it uses Code Division Multiple Access. Or rather, yes, it uses CDMA, but not CDMA.

      Confused? Blame Qualcomm and their army of shills.

      CDMA is used to refer to both a standard and a particular technology type. (The same is kind of the case with TDMA, which was used by Qualcomm to great effect. TDMA is how a fairly awful US mobile phone standard based upon Time Division Multiple Access was usually refered to, the technical name being IS-136. Qualcomm shills would say things like "Look at this awful TDMA phone. See how crappy TDMA is? Well, that's what GSM uses!" In reality, there was no connection whatsoever other than the same basic principle being used to transmit data.) CDMA the standard is a system that uses the CDMA technology type to transmit calls, and is codified as IS-95. CDMA the technology type involves sending a large number of coded packets containing your data via a spread spectrum technique, with the receiver doing lots of work to put it all back together.

      Now, when you're talking about convergance, you're talking about standards, not technology types. Otherwise, for example, you could argue that IBM and Apple's computers were "converged" in the early seventies because they both used logic gates made out of CMOS type silicon chips.

      WCDMA is not based on the IS-95 standard. It has nothing to do with IS-95. The radio part is different in terms of how it uses spectrum except for the basic principle behind how it works. So it doesn't represent "convergance" with CDMA because, well:

      1. If it's convergance with CDMA the technology type, then the term is meaningless. You can't "converge" a standard with a technology type. That's silly.
      2. If it's convergance with CDMA the popular name for IS-95, then no, that's not happening either. Qualcomm isn't happy with WCDMA and is cooperating largely because they get a few patent royalties out of the deal. You'll not even be able to (efficiently) use the two standards on the same frequencies. That's how different they are.
      I hope that answers your question. It would help a lot if people hadn't bought the "We'll refer to standards by the initials of a technology they use" thing that makes references to CDMA and TDMA so ambigious. I was trying to avoid ambiguity in what I wrote, but I'm guessing I didn't make it clear enough.
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  25. That should be a hit! by ceeam · · Score: 2, Funny

    You guys are always complaining that they don't make a phone "that should only make calls" and without any auxiliaries? This is the answer - a smartphone from _Dell_!

  26. Not to worry. by Johnny+Mozzarella · · Score: 4, Funny

    Apple is also getting into the phone market.
    With in 4 months Apple will release a phone using custom hardware and software that will be years ahead of anything else currently on the market. It will have more features yet be simple to use because of its revolutionary one-button interface.

    Within 12 months Dell will release a phone with twice as many features(only a quarter of which actually work), 104-key keypad with 24 programmable hot-keys and an AM/FM radio... for half the price.

    1. Re:Not to worry. by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      really? 4 months? where can I read about it on the FCC website?

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  27. first step: look up what innovation means. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PC's have been able to do "alternative 'entertainment' usage" for a long time. The only thing that's changed is people catching on. That's slow witted people having an ipifany, not innovation.

    Same deal with your first "innovation" bullet point; More people using something does not equal innovation.

    1. Re:first step: look up what innovation means. by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      (Response to AC, not grandparent, for those filtering ACs)

      Actually, innovation merely means introducing a technology. So Henry Ford, Microsoft, et al, can reasonably called innovators even though they didn't invent anything and people were doing the same things as they were doing before they did.

      That said, my comment was that there have been no surprises. Technological progress has been slow, and while usage has moved towards home entertainment et al, it's been a gradual, not revolutionary, process. We're far away from what was going on in the late eighties and early nineties.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  28. This just in... by Uptown+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

    Steve (the Dell Dude) was busted buying weed with his new Dell phone...

    "Dude, you're getting a Dell... phone"

    I miss Steve.

    1. Re:This just in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a cover for Steve's phone:

      http://www.cellularfactory.com/det.jsp?d=15683&c =9 573

  29. as was said about their move into printers by Shivetya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and that move is doing very well. Dell rarely makes mistakes. They do make them but they also make decisions that work very well regardless of industry outlook. Moving into branded printers was decried by many as a waste of time but that hasn't proven so.

    Consider their corporate connection and this makes a lot of sense. Where I work is almost now all Dell. It saves time and money to single source many different items. Throwing phones into the mix wouldn't be too much of a stretch. They have established a level of trust with us and many other companies, that can be used to further expand their interest and protect them from being too tightly focused on one industry.

    I suspect that if a certain other /. favorite hardware seller were entering the market the responses would be very different.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
    1. Re:as was said about their move into printers by ePhil_One · · Score: 1
      Consider their corporate connection and this makes a lot of sense. Where I work is almost now all Dell. It saves time and money to single source many different items.

      Actually, I'd prefer to specialize, buy all my computer equipment from Dell, all my printers are Hp's. Over the past few months, Dell's been leveraging the former relationship to take over the latter. I buy 3 servers, they throw in a printer. I will soon have as many Dell printers as Hp, and the Dell's are often higher tech simply because they are newer (those Hp's are almost 6 years old and just starting to wear out). I'm not really sure how they plan to make money with this strategy, but I'm certain they will claim marketshare, which is clearly their only goal for now.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
  30. great! by utexaspunk · · Score: 2, Informative

    as an owner of an HP iPaq 6315, I think this will be good for the market. The more competition there is in the market for PocketPC phones, the cheaper they'll get and the more they'll try to innovate.

    I've had my iPaq since January, and it has definitely impacted my life. I surf the web, play games, and listen to MP3's on the bus, can view the PDF bus schedules if I need to, I can sync with MS money, which is really handy because I'm terrible about keeping a check register. I think if these were cheaper (I got mine used & unlocked off of the company bb for $400) and there were a little more innovation, everyone would want one.

  31. Dell + Cellphones = by bbzzdd · · Score: 1

    DellPhones?

    Kinda like the DellPod as I like to call it.

  32. Hit the mark for this to be modded -1. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truth hurts eh? Does it really matter if the pleabs know that Dell are a bunch of shits? They're suppliers already do so it can't be them that the modder is trying prevent from seeing reality pointed out.

  33. PDA's are dying? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    I used to have a normal GSM phone (Ericsson T610). I quickly got used to and then addicted to the organizer functions. The problem was that I was spending to much time trying to work the organizer functions and typing increasingly long texts with that little keypad. I suppose some people can live with spending more than 10 seconds making an entry but I am simply to impatient. Also I quickly decided that I wanted to keep track of my personal expenses with the phone as well and to keep this and other personal information thoroughly encrypted. After taking a look at the Ericsson P800 and P900 series I am now using a HP iPaq 6300 series GSM capable PDA and have never looked back. I can do all of the above and more in a fraction of the time it would take on a normal GSM phone. If anything putting GPS cards in PDA's has given them a new lease of life and if you add GPS they can do things you can never dream of doing with a GSM phone. Yes they are big but they also come with an awful lot of functionality a GSM phone does not have with its display that is raely bigger than a stamp and a set of applications you have to work with a tiny keypad never designed for the purpose. What I'd really like to see is a combination PDA+iPod+GSM phone with Bluetoot/Wifi, the type of snap on accessories of the iPod and that runs some form of embedded OS.X or Linux.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:PDA's are dying? by GlassUser · · Score: 1

      What I'd really like to see is a combination PDA+iPod+GSM phone with Bluetoot/Wifi, the type of snap on accessories of the iPod and that runs some form of embedded OS.X or Linux.

      I'm in for some of this too. Actually I don't think it would be too hard to make a sleeve (like the old ipaqs had) that had a battery and a 1.8" hard drive in it. The only problem is that the new hpaqs don't have the 100 pin expansion bus. Maybe the SDIO socket could be hijacked?

  34. Reply to off-topic rant by menace3society · · Score: 2, Informative
    From very earlier on a compiler has been distinguished from an assembler. The compiler converts high-level language code into low-level, machine-specific assembly, and then the assembler assembles that into object code (I have a book on AI programming from the 1960s that attests to this usage).

    And nobody ever uses the term "linker" to refer to either a compiler or an assembler. They use it to refer to a program that links the object code produced by the assembler to to static blocks of code that get stuck on the beginning and end of the object code to form an executable. Early computers didn't have linkers to do this; you had to put the specially-marked decks of punch-cards at the beginning and end of the object code for it to run.

    1. Re:Reply to off-topic rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From very earlier on a compiler has been distinguished from an assembler. The compiler converts high-level language code into low-level, machine-specific assembly, and then the assembler assembles that into object code (I have a book on AI programming from the 1960s that attests to this usage).
      Probably written by a tech illiterate too, one of those who started the "a translater is a 'compiler'" meme.
      And nobody ever uses the term "linker" to refer to either a compiler or an assembler. They use it to refer to a program that links the object code produced by the assembler to to static blocks of code that get stuck on the beginning and end of the object code to form an executable
      That's what a compiler is, or was until people abused the term and started using it to describe code translaters.

      I hate them. I hate them soooooo much. These people need to be strung up, torturing our language in this way. Perhaps they will be. Time will tell.

    2. Re:Reply to off-topic rant by concept14 · · Score: 1

      Are you going to call Aho and Ullman tech illiterates? Principles of COmpiler Design, 1977 -- the classic "dragon book."

      Seriously, I'm curious -- I've never heard your usage of "C convertor" before. What community is it customary in?

      --
      Quis metamoderunt ipses metamoderatores?
  35. Misery enjoys company! by qualico · · Score: 1

    Finally, maybe some of the other companies, (Fido, Rogers, Telus, Bell), can join me in my little boat.

    Dell has sucked my consulting business pretty much dry.
    Now they get to see first hand what it feels like when your market is assimilated right from under you.

    Time to short some stocks and just become another Dell zombie?

    Seems our business climate these days are all about driving out competition and innovation through patents and outsourcing into foreign markets.

    First one to the finish line wins a shopping spree at Wally World!

  36. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I was about to buy an iPaq 6315 but now I think I'll wait until 2006.

    Seriously, how is this news?Is it me or have there ben a rash of "on the verge of", "poised to" and "may at some point in the future" posts this last few days?

  37. You had me until you said PDAs are dying. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The correct line is "BSD is dying".

  38. Yes but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    will it get into cell phones with AMD?

  39. That's nice, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your rebuttle isn't applicable to the AC's post, who was replying to amichalo(who equated increase usage and awareness to innovation).

    1. Re:That's nice, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My rebuttle was entirely relevent to the AC post, who claimed that more people using something can't be innovation.

      If more people are using something because for the first time it's been successfully packaged and marketed on a mass market basis, then it most certainly is innovation.

  40. DUDE... by kjeldor · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're getting a cell!

  41. No no by commodoresloat · · Score: 1
    It's:

    Dude! You're getting a cell!

  42. I guess the weirdest part... by ultramk · · Score: 1

    ...the weirdest part about this is, DELLRumors hasn't said a peep about this yet!

    m-

    --
    You catch enchiladas by picking them up behind the head and holding them underwater until they don't kick anymore -VeGas
  43. My Nokia 3650 does all of this stuff by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    Check out this, which has a utility which extracts URLs from Semacode 2D barcodes.

    I used to be into PDAs, but the stupid bricks that are being pushed onto the market are obtuse, non-useful, and geared towards being sold, not towards usefulness.

    I get far more usefulness from my old Nokia 3650 than I ever did from my fleet of Palms, PocketPCs, and others -- contact lists, calendar/alarm, games, news, and communication with other people.

    I might like a Dell, though I'd use it more for wearable wardriving, than as a PDA.

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    1. Re:My Nokia 3650 does all of this stuff by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      Semacode -- Whoops, mistyped the URL.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  44. Wonder if Dell (and others) are positioning by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1

    for VOIP via WiMax. IMO fear of WiMax VOIP will push the cell phone companies to offer better bandwidth for IP traffic in order to compete. or are we gonna see the cell phone companies offering WiMax?

  45. could work by drb_chimaera · · Score: 1

    Personally I'd be extremely interested in such a device - If it could improve on the few failings of the iMate Jam I'd pretty much be sold - to my mind all the Jam needs is onboard wireless and more onboard memory to be about perfect - I suppose a better camera would be nice but for me thats an irrelevance - I'm on my third camera phone and all but never use them :)

  46. CDMA is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just drove cross country, going through more than 20 states. I have a CDMA cell phone, it ALWAYS worked, even 50 miles off the interstates. GSM is OK if you stay on the interstate in one of the 20 largest cities, once you go into the sticks, it isn't available.


    BTW, I have a TracFone signed up to Verizon/Alltel. I kept track of the SysID/NetID codes, so I know this.

  47. PDA Phones are great but... by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    PDA phones are awesome, I own the Siemens SX66. However, I don't think Dell should be venturing into the PDA phone market in terms of producing just another GSM or CDMA phone for specific carriers in the US or abroad. They could always sell unlocked phones, but for some reason I doubt they will. Look at the HPaq 6315 PDA phone as an example. HP could have sold it unlocked outright with all the vendors they have, but they don't.

    If Dell wants to beat out HP and their iPaq and all the new PDA phone vendors coming through the fray (like BenQ, Samsung, etc.), what they should do is: 1) sell the device unlocked, 2) quietly bolster hotspot development like T-Mobile's wifi hotspots, or even behind-the-scene ISP's such as speakeasy (which has a great TOS that allows you to share your broadband), 3) buy out VoIP services like Skype, SIPphone, or FreeWorldDialup and finally, 4) develop a kickass PDA application for VoIP on their wifi enabled PDA, that works well with your bluetooth headset, has voice dialing, call history list, caller ID, conferencing, all the accoutrements, etc. That application alone could make or break sales of the new PDA. If there was such an application pre-built/pre-installed on the X50, I would have bought that device long ago. Free calls using my wifi network that is comparable to my cell phone in functionality!?! It's a no-brainer.

  48. Dude! by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Dude! Can you hear me now!? ...oh wait, they got rid of that guy. (*sigh of relief*)

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  49. China has gone CDMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I live in the Dobson/CellularOne area. They are running two systems, the GSM phones and their old TDMA/analog. The towers alternate technologies, so reception always sucks, no matter what tech you use.


    You sign up for GSM if you're always going to be in the UP of Michigan/northern Wisconsin/easter Minnesota. It's 800 MHZ GSM, only. If you go to Milwaukee Chicago, you're shit out of luck, because that's 1900 MHz. TMobile doesn't work in the sticks, because it's 1900MHz only.

    Verizon was the biggest phone company, until Cingular nabbed AT&T. AT&T is currently a hodgepodge of TDMA and analog.

    GSM phones never have analog.

    CDMA phones usually do. If you travel, get a triband CDMA, that's 800/1900 CDMA+analog. It'll always work.

  50. Official launch of the Treo 650 in the UK by cpeterso · · Score: 1


    I know you said you don't use Orange, but they are launching the Treo 650 tomorrow:

    "Official launch of the Treo 650 in the UK"