Slashdot Mirror


China Locks in its Net-Citizenry

DatedNews writes "China's registry CNNIC teamed up in March with registar i-DNS.net to provide "Internet domains completely in Chinese characters" to the Greater Chinese Internet community. What at first might look like a localization issue could potentially become a powerfull user lock-in and turn out to be a very effective addition to The Great Chinese Filtering."

217 comments

  1. In other words by winkydink · · Score: 3, Funny

    It is therefore natural for us to ensure that foreign entities who wish to protect their Chinese language domain names in the .˾ and .ÍøÂç extensions are able to participate early on in the process. Therefore, we are very pleased to partner with i-DNS.net to bring this early opportunity to people outside of China now."

    We have figured out a way to extract yet more money from the running capitalist dogs.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Fuck the communist hypocrites. Fucking tyrants.

      There, I am done venting.

    2. Re:In other words by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Potential registrants who cannot speak or type Chinese can also register names via an on-line transliteration service provided at a modest fee.

      OK, who want a really rough translation of their domain names into chinese? .. Bite the wax tadpole anyone?

    3. Re:In other words by winkydink · · Score: 1

      It gets me all flustered when you talk dirty like that. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:In other words by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      We have figured out a way to extract yet more money from the running capitalist dogs.

      Oh, heck, they've been doing that for years! Large civil projects were often performed out of Hong Kong years ago before the handover, because HK companies could get the job done unlike so many bureacratic failures within the PRC.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    5. Re:In other words by Fjornir · · Score: 1

      It will bring your ancestors back to life!

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  2. Great Chinese Filtering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    surely it's called the Great Firewall of China?

    1. Re:Great Chinese Filtering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not after running it through babelfish a couple of times.

    2. Re:Great Chinese Filtering? by Duncan3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Fear not!!! This will be fixed in the dupe.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    3. Re:Great Chinese Filtering? by DuBois · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It really *is* the Great Firewall of China. I'm in China right now, but not behind the Great Firewall (which prevents any kind of real-time access, making all access to the "outside" running-dog slow).

      Fortunately, where I am, you can actually get Hong Kong-connected ADSL, thus bypassing the GFoC and making "real" Internet access possible.

      --
      The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
  3. I can see it now by Raul654 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your attempted to access taiwan.gov.ta has been logged. Reeducation teams are now en route to your location. Please do not flee, you traitorous capitalist.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, factual error ... I think the taiwanese TLD is .tw ;)

    2. Re:I can see it now by Goonie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you called making money the wrong name, it's "socialism with Chinese characteristics"...er "Three Represents"...er, what's the current guy calling it?

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    3. Re:I can see it now by Enoch+Root · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ya know, I'll take Slashdot's China-censoring rants seriously the day the Chinese government actually, you know, censors Slashdot...

      As it stands, I've been healthily losing time reading anti-Chinese ramblings on Slashdot for two years from Shanghai.

      I have yet to run into any t#*#&$&$[NO CARRIER]

    4. Re:I can see it now by makomk · · Score: 1

      Eh, factual error ... I think the taiwanese TLD is .tw ;)

      As indeed, you should know - quite a lot of cheapo hardware has .tw addresses...

    5. Re:I can see it now by 4of12 · · Score: 1

      you traitorous capitalist.

      The irony is that you could probably get into a great deal of hot water in PRC by vigorously advocating that Marxist ideology be applied to liberating the oppressed workers of China right now.

      Just like you could get into trouble in the USA by refusing to pay taxes to the official government, declaring your independence, forming a new government with the same rhetoric and other tools used by the founding fathers.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    6. Re:I can see it now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is your point? There isn't censorship in China?

  4. Of course... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    99% of all filtered websites out there have English domains. It would seem that Chinese who are just starting with the internet would go first to chinese domain names. They might go so far as to have a "white" list for english domain names

    1. Re:Of course... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      I'm more concerned about spam... once the spammers hit it there will be a huge uproar as people try to block off chinese names...

      English servers may not support blocking of chinese characters in domain names, we're going to see a flurry of software updates and spammers battling against each other for a while.

  5. How do I do research? by Indes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Being a Canadian student with very little experience in Chinese, I think that it may be harder now to get localized information about specific things in China as they'll be oddities in the dns names..

    Does this mean everyone is gonna have to go to UTF-8? What about those in some BSD camps that don't have full chinese support?

    1. Re:How do I do research? by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      Being a Canadian student with very little experience in Chinese, I think that it may be harder now to get localized information about specific things in China as they'll be oddities in the dns names..

      But it might be easier to those who know Chinese to get localized Chinese information. It makes sense that those who most want localized Chineese information are Chineese.

      If China is smart, they'll find a way to keep spam out of the new domain. I remember the golden days of the internet when I would do a search with webcrawler or excite and get back a list of useful websites, today i get back commercial websites wanting to sell something.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:How do I do research? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being a Western person who happens to speak fluent Mandarin (and Cantonese) as well as 'type Chinese' as well as English:

      Does this mean everyone is going to have to type English when accessing URLs? Why shouldn't URLs by Chinese characters first romanisation after.

      Of course a section of the internet written in Chinese readable in Chinese will have profound impacts on me.

      But what if I only understand/comprehend English, then I must be locked in. Damn this user lock in that is dependent on my knowledge. Damn those French, Italian, Iranian speakers who are also 'locked in' by speaking their own languange.

    3. Re:How do I do research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iranian? Wow, never even heard of that language before..

      lol...

    4. Re:How do I do research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:How do I do research? by martian265 · · Score: 1

      I believe that the people of Iran are called Iranians (at least in Western English speaking countries), but there is not language called Iranian. In fact the most predominant language is Farsi, a Persian language. According to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/ ir.html#People
      the languages spoken in Iran are:

      Persian and Persian dialects 58%, Turkic and Turkic dialects 26%, Kurdish 9%, Luri 2%, Balochi 1%, Arabic 1%, Turkish 1%, other 2%

      Granted the CIA might not be the least biased source of information, but they are nosey enough to probably have at least some of the facts right.

    6. Re:How do I do research? by 2Bits · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, let's rephrase that for a Chinese student:


      Being a Chinese student with very little experience in English, I think that it may be harder now to get localized information about specific things in Canada/USA as they'll be oddities in the dns names..


      What's wrong for a country to try to promote technologies that work better in the local languages?

      What would Canadians and Americans think if they have to learn Chinese to use the Internet? That's what Chinese people (and all other people) have to do, i.e. learning English, to go online.

      The world is a beautiful place, with all its differences and disparities. It would be really boring if everyone has to speak english and eat big macs, don't you think?

    7. Re:How do I do research? by whorfin · · Score: 1

      What about those in some BSD camps that don't have full chinese support?

      Fuck 'em and tell them to join the modern world, perhaps? Sorry, but I hardly think that China gives a rats ass about people who choose to use an OS that doesn't support their language. And by the way, that group includes unicode, in case you were wondering.

      --
      Laugh while you can, monkey-boy!
    8. Re:How do I do research? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Does this mean everyone is gonna have to go to UTF-8?

      i-DNS uses Punycode to encode the names.

      And while UTF-8 could be used to encode Chinese documents, "GB" encoding standards are the preferred way to go. The GB encodings were designed by Chinese people for the purpose of encoding Chinese text efficiently.

      GB18030 is the latest revision that I've seen, and it is a beast. A couple of years ago we spent a bunch of time updating our code to ensure support for GB18030 because PRC requires you to support it if you want to sell your software there.

      I highly recommend this tutorial on character encoding if you want to learn more about encoding in general. (That tutorial does not focus on CJK encoding specifically, but it is a great primer on encoding in general.)

      Also, if you are trying to find good access to localized Chinese information, I strongly recommend learning the language. Any information written in English that you may come across was obviously not intended for a Chinese audience.

    9. Re:How do I do research? by bokane · · Score: 1

      I may be misunderstanding you here, but the problem with offering romanized Chinese as an alternative to characters is that, e.g., .cn and .cn will both come out as 'baidu.cn.' I don't really see the point of character domain names, but then I'm often too lazy to fire up my IME and input characters.

    10. Re:How do I do research? by fearofcarpet · · Score: 2, Insightful
      What would Canadians and Americans think if they have to learn Chinese to use the Internet? That's what Chinese people (and all other people) have to do, i.e. learning English, to go online.

      While I have absolutely no problem whatsoever wth Chinese URLs/webpages, whatever, you have to know that this is a specious argument. The Internet was developed in English, therefore people who wanted to partake had to learn English. Now China is addressing that problem by creating Chinese URLs. When China creates the next big global technology (as I'm sure they will in the not-too-distant future) they can make it Chinese-only and the shoe will be on the other foot.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
  6. I can't take it any more! by veg_all · · Score: 4, Funny

    potentially become a powerfull user lock-in

    Arrgghhh!!! Even on the front page now? THERE'S ONLY ONE "L" IN "POWERFUL!"

    Ooops. Guess I'll have to change my sig now.

    --
    grammar-lesson free since 1999. (rescinded - 2005)
    1. Re:I can't take it any more! by grolschie · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's a "registar"?

    2. Re:I can't take it any more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrgghhh!!! Even on the front page now? THERE'S ONLY ONE "L" IN "POWERFUL!"

      Oh, come on! THERE ARE THREE 'R's AND THREE 'G's in "ARRRGGHHH!" (And remember, for exclamation marks, it's one or none.)

    3. Re:I can't take it any more! by quantum+bit · · Score: 1

      Strong = Stong
      Matt = DELETED!

    4. Re:I can't take it any more! by winkydink · · Score: 1

      It's where they send the money each year to renew the tags on the Death Star.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:I can't take it any more! by arodland · · Score: 1

      nah, no need. That's spelling, not grammar :)

    6. Re:I can't take it any more! by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it's just that the space was mis-placed. It was supposed to read "powerful luser lock-in".

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    7. Re:I can't take it any more! by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      Strong = Stong
      Do not mangle the S tong.

    8. Re:I can't take it any more! by Bug2000 · · Score: 1

      What an insightfull comment!

      --

      É que os desafinados também têm um coração
  7. Buzzword Alert by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1, Redundant

    BUZZWORD ALERT!!
    BUZZWORD ALERT!!

    You are charged with not using the correct buzzword (however much more correct the terminology you have used may be.

    The Great Chinese Filtering

    should be stated as:

    The Great Firewall of China

    1. Re:Buzzword Alert by vxone · · Score: 1

      Well maybe, but I really think this sorta thinking is not very helpful for the overall internet community as a whole. We are a limited species to begin with and if certain people in the world begin to separate them selves. The Internet as a whole will suffer, In my opinion this is not really very healthy. Considering that those of us who use this online atmosphere for more things than to spread buzz words. We should try and keep friendly relations. Rather than attempt to spread a way of thinking that will only inhibit.

    2. Re:Buzzword Alert by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Redundant? I was the first person on this story to say anything about it.

    3. Re:Buzzword Alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=147445&cid =12353407
      If by first you mean second, then yes, you are correct.

    4. Re:Buzzword Alert by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1

      Hrmm. I thought I was the first.

      Oh well. Either way, look at my profile! No redudant posts, then 3 in a row?

      I think someone's who dislikes me got some mod points and said "I'm going to mark everything he says redundant.

  8. Dupe? by John+Seminal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What at first might look like a localization issue could potentially become a powerfull user lock-in and turn out to be a very effective addition to The Great Chinese Filtering

    How so, this would lock out people outside of China, not inside China. I don't have any chinese character set installed on my pc, and I would not have a way of typing in that domain name.

    If I owned a company in China, and wanted to do buisness in other countries, I would not want a domain with just Chinese characters, my non-Chinese customers would have a more difficult time finding me.

    I just don't see how this locks Chinese people into anything. It gives them more choice.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:Dupe? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      If you can read Chinese, you can type the URL on your system too. As usual, this story is overblow sensationalism.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Dupe? by McCaliber · · Score: 1

      The concern is not about filtering websites from companies in China. The filter's job is to stop information from all other websites from entering China. Eventually, the Great Firewall of China could start filtering anything that did not have a government approved Chinese character domain name. This wouldn't stop too much business, but would represent a significant hurdle for most non-business websites, especially those focused on "corrupt western influences". I'm not saying this is a good enough reason to not support Chinese character domain names. But I think it was the point of the original post's comment.

    3. Re:Dupe? by Enoch+Root · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Don't fret. Here's how this article came to be:

      - A random Slashdot reader stumbles upon an article;
      - Realizing it's about China, he suspects this could make the front page;
      - BUT! It's not anti-Chinese, just about allowing Hanzi URLs! What to do!
      - The random Slashdot reader adds a RANDOM ANTI-COMMUNIST BASTARDS slant. Voila!
      - Editors approve the article in the blink of an eye.

      And that, my friend, is how Slashdot front pages are made.

    4. Re:Dupe? by mikeb39 · · Score: 1

      *nod*

    5. Re:Dupe? by ZhuLien · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should do the same, only allow .au domain names from being accessed within Australia. That would stop the "corrupt american influences" - oops, our government bends over backwards for George Bush Jr, it won't happen :(

    6. Re:Dupe? by schotty · · Score: 1
      If I owned a company in China, and wanted to do buisness in other countries, I would not want a domain with just Chinese characters, my non-Chinese customers would have a more difficult time finding me.
      How so? That entity can have multiple domains. I find that to be more respective to the Chinese people. Really, why should they have to know another language just to buy my product or service?

      If I have a company Schotty, I can register Schotty.us, schotty.com, $&@%$&*#.cn, etc. They can all point to the same IP, but thats not the point. The point is that it costs only a few bucks to kiss the customer's ass a bit more.
      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
  9. Quick! by mikeophile · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's "porno" in Cantonese?

    1. Re:Quick! by winkydink · · Score: 1

      roughly the same word as "summary execution and we send your family a bill for the bullet".

      No wait. That's Mandarin.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "San kay peen" -- Or Category 3* Films...

      They're rather popular in Hong Kong ;)

      * Analogous to the PG-13, M, R resitrictions in America, Hong Kong has take a similar approach but used numbers to class the films

    3. Re:Quick! by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Informative

      Please forgive the poor transliteration!

      Porn Video: haam di (hah-mm dee)
      Horny: haam suup (hah-mm s-uh-p) literally salty and wet

      At least, those are the colloquial expressions I'm told.

    4. Re:Quick! by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0

      Porn Video: haam di (hah-mm dee)
      Horny: haam suup (hah-mm s-uh-p) literally salty and wet


      That's cantonese, not chinese..

      Anyway, why would you bother with Chinese porn anyway? There are lots of it in the US... :D

    5. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck, someone asks how to say porno in cantonese. Someone else responds. You chime in with "That's cantonese, not chinese..". What the fuck, are you just super-retarded?

    6. Re:Quick! by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is "se qing", with se being a word meaning "form", but also meaning "lust". Qing means "passion". not neccesarily in a sexual sense, but sometimes in that way. So together, se qing means "pornographic".

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    7. Re:Quick! by mvdw · · Score: 1
      Horny: haam suup (hah-mm s-uh-p) literally salty and wet

      Sounds like: Ham Soup. So, obviously, it's salty and wet...

    8. Re:Quick! by metlin · · Score: 1

      Okay, that figures.

      During my internship last summer, I met a cute Chinese girl. Asked her for her name and number and she said it was Ping. I heard it as Qing, and wrote it as such, and she looked terribly flustered.

      Damn! If only I'd known then. :-/

    9. Re:Quick! by thomasa · · Score: 1

      From babelfish: Simplified Chinese - see how
      Slashdot renders it.

      [] see in the brackets?

      se4qing2 in pinyin

    10. Re:Quick! by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Almost.

      You see, the Chinese language allows different characters (or rather, words) to have exactly the same pronounciation.

      The word in Chinese that means "form" is pronounced as "se" (mandarin), but it's not the same word as the "se" in the erotic sense.

      The correct word "se" means "color" (the more common use) and also means "erotic" (a tad bit different from lust).

      "qing" is "passion", "love", "feeling", etc. I might add it also has the meaning of "situation". (though I'm not exactly sure whether this is entirely correct). The word has no sexual/erotic meanings in itself.

      So "se qing" perhaps could be roughly translated as "erotic passion", i.e. "pornographic".

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    11. Re:Quick! by sydneyfong · · Score: 2, Informative

      As mentioned by a (currently) 0-score poster, this is Cantonese instead of Mandarin.

      Anyway, I'd like to say that for "Porn Video", the pronounciation is "haam dai" ("dai" rhymes with "fly")

      ("dai" in this context means "tape".)

      Hope that helps ;-p

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    12. Re:Quick! by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      The characters for "se" are the same. In fact, there meanings are the same. "Form", "color" and "lust" are all different meanings derived from the root meaning.

      This is very parallel to the English word "sensation". "Sensual" has an erotic connocation, but "sensation", which is really the same word, can just refer to "sense data".

      "Qing" by itself has the same erotic meaning that "passion" has in English. Passion can be used to refer to anything from religion to sex, but it does have at least some connoctations of sexuality.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    13. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argh... forgive my poor mandarin
      (You can see where I'm from ;-p)

    14. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For the more hardcore ones, they're called "Say Jai". ( a nickname of "Category 4" films )

      But then it's all too easy for foreign speakers to get the pronounciation wrong and instead say something which roughly means "SoB"/"Bastard", etc.

      Risk is yours. ;-p

    15. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xn--feuo36e in idn!

    16. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try this phrase "Wu lang bo chin nai ko"

    17. Re:Quick! by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      But what's "goat" in Cantonese?

    18. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, for that matter, "goatse" ?

    19. Re:Quick! by jiawen · · Score: 1

      This would be helpful if it were Cantonese. Se4qing2 is Mandarin. Giving Mandarin answers to questions about Cantonese only serves to confuse Westerners further about the difference. So, Cantonese speakers in the audience: how do you read in Cantonese? Is that a better word than ?

    20. Re:Quick! by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      First, I should have used the characters, but Slashdot doesn't accept them.

      Second, Cantonese is gutter speech.

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    21. Re:Quick! by jasonjacks0n · · Score: 1
      Horny: haam suup (hah-mm s-uh-p) literally salty and wet

      Er .. isn't that part supposed to come at the end? Maybe that's the translation for "sated"..

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  10. Man... by Bananatree3 · · Score: 1

    Now only if I could speak Chinese...

    1. Re:Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't beat them, join them ... ;) Pick up chinese. If you can do that... go to Singapore (which is closer to China than the US), pick up an easy girl (there are lots of them there), and then move to China.

      N'uff said

    2. Re:Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be Cantonese, Mandarin, or one of the more than 300 other languages and dialects spoken there?

    3. Re:Man... by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Of course, you don't actually have to speak any Chinese to be literate in it. I'm still not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. At least you can't misspell words.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
  11. I was going to write something witty... by demonbug · · Score: 1

    About the characters... but I don't seem to be able to use them in a post. No fair! I went through a lot of work hitting ctrl-c ctrl-v, all for nothing!
    How am I supposed to properly discuss this topic if I can't even post the network domain characters?

    1. Re:I was going to write something witty... by John+Seminal · · Score: 1
      About the characters... but I don't seem to be able to use them in a post. No fair! I went through a lot of work hitting ctrl-c ctrl-v, all for nothing!

      I think it is alt, then the 3 number code you want. That is how you get other characters.

      Try it. Alt-241 gives you ±, alt-142 gives you Ä.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    2. Re:I was going to write something witty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That'll get you ASCII on some operating systems (with some input widgets) but not unicode anywhere, fucktard.

    3. Re:I was going to write something witty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you windows users are suckers. Get a keyboard with an option key (think Apple) and try for Å, or for å.

      Seriously, I don't know why anyone thinks that the ASCII code for a character is a useful input method. It should just be a modifier and the romanized key, not some silly code.

    4. Re:I was going to write something witty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, you windows users are suckers. Get a keyboard with an option key (think Apple) and try <option><shift><a> for Å, or <option><a> for å.

      Seriously, I don't know why anyone thinks that the ASCII code for a character is a useful input method. It should just be a modifier and the romanized key, not some silly code.

  12. In this morning's news... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    KMT party chairman visits Beijing. I wonder how the PRC press handled that, characterizing the ROC as a rogue province as long as they have. Must have kept the censors on their toes, especially when he walked off the plane in a suit, rather than rags and waving a 'Death to China' banner and dripping blood from his fangs... or is it only North Korea who portrays others like that..

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:In this morning's news... by humaniverse · · Score: 0, Troll

      I guess you either from Mars or from fooled island called Taiwan. Watch news on CCTV! Man, open your eyes! See how biased Taiwaness by its media rather than mainland.

    2. Re:In this morning's news... by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      No, it also reminds me of... err nevermind, I maybe shouldn't say that out loud.

    3. Re:In this morning's news... by leandrod · · Score: 2, Insightful
      > KMT party chairman visits Beijing. I wonder how the PRC press handled that, characterizing the ROC as a rogue province as long as they have

      Easy. China has already cowered KMT to abandon the 'reconquer the mainland' policy. Now the KMT just wants to wait the mainland dictatorship to crumble down on its own. But on the other hand China's fear is now Formosan nationalism, and against that the KMT is an ally.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    4. Re:In this morning's news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could actually read the PRC press and find out...

    5. Re:In this morning's news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the KMT and the Taiwan Govt that's having PR troubles. The PRC and people in Mainland China are longing for a re-unification of Mainland and Taiwan. But in Taiwan some people feel that the visit is a betrayal of the Taiwanese people exactly because of their long time portrayal of the CCP/PRC as the rogue state.

  13. yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    "...a very effective addition to The Great Chinese Filtering."
    Did you mean the Great Firewall of China?
  14. Ah... by Dan+Up+Baby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love watching China shoot the wings off of its much-prophesied ascendency to world superpower, one authoritarian move at a time.

    Remember, CHINA: "It worked for the soviets, right?"

    1. Re:Ah... by elsilver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it seems to be working for the US, so why shouldn't they give it a try? E.

    2. Re:Ah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you honestly think that the amount of restrictions that the Chinese government is imposing on its citizens is even remotely comparable to those that the US places on its citizens, you seriously need to open up your eyes a little bit more to reality.

    3. Re:Ah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like America are going down, due to their imperialistic right wing policies.

    4. Re:Ah... by orasio · · Score: 1

      You must be from the US.
      For people in the US, a lot of stuff is perceived as ok.
      If you compare individual rights between any particular european country, and the US, you will find that the difference is greater between europe and the US than between the US and China.
      Just because you got accustomed to the government messing with you, it doesn't make it ok.

    5. Re:Ah... by Dan+Up+Baby · · Score: 1

      Wait, socialist Europe is a bastion of individual freedoms? When did this happen?

  15. tempest in a teapot by fliptout · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read tfa and saw nothing about locking in the chinese netizens.

    Look, English literacy is on the rise in China in a major way. With all the influx of foreign investments and foreigners into china, the chinese people are having more contact than ever with the western world. Filtering out everything but chinese characters, while a technical possibility, is simple improbable.

    I lived in china a few months last year, and I'm going back for the long haul soon- from what I have seen, the young, college educated Chinese like their access to information, albeit san porn, Taiwan, etc. To restrict their information flow even more would cause an outcry.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
    1. Re:tempest in a teapot by Bonhamme+Richard · · Score: 1
      young, college educated Chinese like their access to information, albeit san porn, Taiwan, etc. To restrict their information flow even more would cause an outcry.

      I thought the point of the authoritarian state was that there was no OPTION of public outcry. Not to sound like a capitalist dog, decrying the glorious of our wonderful communist state, but what medium would this outcry be in? On the internet, where the government shuts down any site it dislikes? In the state controlled media? In protests that are forcably put down by the government?

      Filtering out everything but chinese characters, while a technical possibility, is simple improbable.

      The real problem with communism is that things that should be improbable actually happen. The Soviets had their economy so f**d up that they we telling people that "Bananas are a luxury we can do without." Authoritarian != logical.

    2. Re:tempest in a teapot by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      and saw nothing about locking in the chinese netizens [...] albeit san porn

      You saw NOTHING??

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    3. Re:tempest in a teapot by coklat · · Score: 1

      well, last time i was in beijing, i tried several times to access yahoogroups and it failed everytime. i guess not only Chinese college student, but a foreigner like me can have an outcry also.

      --
      http://aip.corolla.or.id/
    4. Re:tempest in a teapot by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny
      The young, college-educated Chinese make up a tiny fraction of China's 1,300,000,000 people. The ones who speak English are an even smaller fraction of that, and consist mostly of those who have chosen careers in export trade. Let me guess, you were an English teacher. No surprise there...such a cloistered environment. Businessmen in manufacturing, like me, get out to the factories in the countryside and see the real deal.

      You don't get it. When have the outcries of people on the internet ever accomplished anything?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  16. I'm not getting something by coupland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How does allowing domains to be registered using Chinese characters have anything to do with censorship? The linked articles just prove that China already filters web traffic, regulates content, and shuts down sites they don't like. How is the ability to use Chinese characters in your location bar an indication of a sinister new plot? Sure, there is a sinister plot afoot, but I don't see how this is an astonishing new development...

    1. Re:I'm not getting something by bobtodd · · Score: 1

      Well there are always sinister plots happening *somewhere*. I have to wonder about the real motivations of the people who keep pushing this China bashing? Prepping the next Evil Empire, boys?

      The PRC are not perfect, but neither is the government of any powerful nation. Some just have better PR than others.

      This comment posted from a Free Speech Zone in accordance with the Patriot Act.

    2. Re:I'm not getting something by MorseKode · · Score: 1

      By allowing only chinese written domains through the firewall maybe?

  17. learning mandarin by bladx · · Score: 0

    i'm glad i've started learning mandarin chinese recently.

  18. Re:GNAA KICKS ASS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah the GNAA, I remember when you lot were relevant, now you're just another trolling group. Here's some good advice for you: to get laid before your 40th birthday, you're gonna need to leave your computer some time!

  19. Some tech details, and a question by nstrom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These LGA people claim to require a browser plugin to use these Chinese domain names. However, it just seems that they're implementing the names using punycode and some new (presumably non ICANN-approved) TLDs.

    For example, the domain name "." resolves via punycode to xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d. Now we can check this domain via whois:

    $whois -h whois.i-dns.biz xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d

    i-DNS.net WHOIS Server Version 1-2-0

    This service may be used to query the availability of
    multilingual domain names. Please visit http://www.i-DNS.net/
    for more information about multilingual domain names.

    For help with the i-DNS.net WHOIS service, type 'HELP'.

    Domain ID: D1148313-IDNS
    Domain Name (Native): .
    Domain Name (ACE): xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d
    Created On: 14-Nov-2004 19:58:54 GMT
    Last Updated On: 02-Mar-2005 06:12:50 GMT
    Expiration Date: 14-Nov-2006 19:57:30 GMT

    ... [snipped to get past line-length filters] ...

    Name Server: ns1.i-dns.biz
    Name Server: ns2.i-dns.biz

    and we can actually resolve this name if we use the right DNS server:

    $dig xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d @ns1.i-dns.biz

    ; > DiG 9.2.2 > xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d @ns1.i-dns.biz
    ;; global options: printcmd
    ;; Got answer:
    ;; ->>HEADER ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2

    ;; QUESTION SECTION:
    ;xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d. IN A

    ;; ANSWER SECTION:
    xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d. 86400 IN A 203.81.44.27

    ;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
    xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d. 86400 IN NS ns1.universal-names.com.
    xn--eqro3ot1fkxx.xn--55qx5d. 86400 IN NS ns2.universal-names.com.

    ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
    ns1.universal-names.com. 117755 IN A 203.81.44.40
    ns2.universal-names.com. 117774 IN A 203.81.44.27

    ;; Query time: 821 msec
    ;; SERVER: 203.81.44.40#53(ns1.i-dns.biz)
    ;; WHEN: Tue Apr 26 19:49:06 2005
    ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 148

    The question raised here then is the following: why use a browser plugin at all if all is needed is to configure the user's DNS resolver to consult alternate root servers for the new TLDs? The paranoid conspiracy theorist in me suggests spyware, or something else that's not quite kosher.

    1. Re:Some tech details, and a question by nstrom · · Score: 1

      Replying to myself.

      Slashdot ate my Unicode -- the domain name I was using was the first one in the "Chinese Domain Names" box here.

    2. Re:Some tech details, and a question by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      I don't like it too much, I'd rather china work with ICANN to setup country level aliases so .cn would map to whatever symbol they wish to represent there country in there own alphabet.

      This seems like a bad stopgap which will probably mean every in in china has to register more domain names than they need.

    3. Re:Some tech details, and a question by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      well lets see

      afaict IE does not support internationalised domain names at all

      Mozilla does support them but i belive they now have the feature off by default due to the behaviour of the registries (ie no restrictions whatsoever therefore making it very easy to take a name that renders identically to someone elses)

      so a plugin is the only option for ie users and may be the best way for mozilla users

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    4. Re:Some tech details, and a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, it were the same guys behind i-DNS who proposed and advocated UTF-5 into RFCs, which later evolves into punycode. So they are indeed the same standard,

      The key issue used to be that no browser would support it, so they had to resort to plugins. There is still no support in IE even to this date, though mozilla seems to support it.

      On client side, it apparently needs more support besides just browsers. On the server side, domain registrars have to adopt it too. Otherwise, this sort of thing never would take off.

      What the news really says is that they have just recently gained the support from Chinese govement, i.e., some registrar support. Still a long way to go before it becomes a reality.

  20. Will this create a new domain name goldrush... by mikael · · Score: 1

    ... as every famous person with an European/American name registered the Chinese character spelling (conversions available here)?

    Will names with lucky symbols be outbidded for?

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  21. spam consequenses by dj245 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Great, instead of spam from a fake address at a pump-and-dump english domain, we can have spam from fake email addresses on domains that appear as a bunch of random characters to those without the language set.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:spam consequenses by patio11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, it will appear as punycode to you. You'll end up getting a domain name which looks like xn--tdali-d8a8w.lv (always starts with xn, tends to end up with a lot of - signs). Which is great for you, because if you work in an environment where its possible you can just redirect to /dev/null/ any messages which come from one of those domains, or set SpamAssassin to consider that a very spammy token.

    2. Re:spam consequenses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .lv? Latvia sucks.

  22. China: urgent reform required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Appaling human rights record
    Censorship
    Punishment of political and religious expression

    Why does the world keep rewarding China ?

    Reform/regime change FIRST (get rid of CCP and have democracy)

    Rewards LATER

    1. Re:China: urgent reform required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the ex-USSR is doing just perfectly with democracy... their economy is just booming.

      Unlike you some people realize that rapid change can be disastrous, especially for a country which is not ready for it.

  23. IP Addresses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    teamed up in March with registar i-DNS.net to provide "Internet domains completely in Chinese characters" to the Greater Chinese Internet community.

    So long as it's just the domain name and not the IP Address in Chinese characters, I think we're safe.

  24. Expect browser support ro at least a plugin soon by wsanders · · Score: 1

    Various plugins are available for translating multibyte domain names: example here http://www.domainavenue.com/ml_iclient.htm just pulled off the top of google's search. Eventually all browsers will have multilingual IDN support.

    If you find a site right now it will most likely just have a odd-looking "puny-code" domainname; looks like "xn-.com". I think for the time being each international domain gets registered in both its puby-code and natice formats. I don't think all you BSD hippies are at any particular disadvantage as far as domain names are concerned, excpet to the extent that most of the 3rd party plugins are for MSIE only at this time.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  25. Re:Will this affect IPv9? by jerometremblay · · Score: 4, Informative

    No, because IP and DNS are not on the same network layer. IP is part of the Network Layer (3), while DNS is part of the Application Layer (7).

    A lower layer does not care about what's going on in an higher layer.

  26. ROTFL! China limit spam? by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I'd do the opposite - anybody tries to send me anything with multibyte characters gets dropped in the bit bucket. I'm already getting two or three spams a day in Chinese. A couple more per day in Japanese. For some reason the Korean spam has stopped - hooray Korean ISPs? And no Russian or other Cyrillic alphabet spam ever.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  27. It always happens by ded_si_luap · · Score: 3, Funny

    I look at a Chinese site, and an hour later I'm hungry again.

  28. Would you like some FUD with that? by hunterx11 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China is not implementing their own IDN scheme in an attempt to lock people into it. This is based on existing work on internationalized domain names. The largest country putting their weight behind IDNs is only going to encourage their rapid universal adaptation, and eliminate localization issues.

    --
    English is easier said than done.
    1. Re:Would you like some FUD with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've gotten to him too!! /me runs

  29. Chappelle's show joke... by VolcomPimp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ching chang chong! I can't understand yooooooou!

  30. I read the TFA and yes they would be locked in by wsanders · · Score: 1

    I read TFA after posting earlier and TFA says they are going to basically have their own top level domains in chinese. So unless the almighty gods that run the root servers allow new TLDs with chinese chars the rest of the world won't automatically see these domains.

    And, to put on my authoritarian hat, if require all the ISPs in my empire to use my alternate set of root servers or my ministry-of-truth-approved DNS resolvers or some such, I can make amazon.chinese-chars-for-gongsi resolve to my ministry-of-truth-approved bookstore and not amazon.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:I read the TFA and yes they would be locked in by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      No, the rest of the world would just be locked out.

      And as for your point of hijacking existing domains, they CAN do this now if they wanted to: Just force the ISP's to use relay their DNS requests to the government's DNS servers, which selectively hijack "dangerous" domains, and relay the rest to the real TLD nameservers.

      Besides, it's not like they're not filtering out stuff already now. They don't need another mechanism for that.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  31. Shameless freenet plug by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Support a free internet for everyone. Run a freenet node, available at http://www.freenetproject.org/.

  32. Did someone say templest? Re:tempest in a teapot by templest · · Score: 1

    You raaaaaaaaaaaaaaang?
    ... Oh, "tempest". I'll ust crawl back into my cave now. :(

    --
    I'm a signature virus. Please copy me to your signature so I can replicate.
  33. Huh? by peatbakke · · Score: 1

    This seems like a GOOD THING! Honestly, restricting the DNS universe to a small subset of ASCII is simply arrogance. I want my umlauts and graves, durnit.

    Besides, if they already have ways of restricting access to Internet sites -- adding a character set to a level 7 protocol isn't a practical way to censor anything.

    1. Re:Huh? by tuxguy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Arrogance? We (America) invented the darn thing! We can do whatever we want with it!

      Okay, that probably came out as troll/flamebait, but it always seemed funny to me how people will get mad at the inventors of something because they didn't put in a feature that the complaining person wanted. I think we should have a bunch of seperate internets connected togethor by an intercontinental WAN.

      --
      "I don't really care if they label me a Jesus Freak / There aint no disguising the truth!" - DC Talk
    2. Re:Huh? by peatbakke · · Score: 1

      Hehe, well, I'm an American, I just happen to travel a lot. ;)

      My point about arrogance is that technically it's not a difficult problem, and the majority of people who are online these days regularly use characters outside the ASCII chart. Your point about inventor's control is fair, but it doesn't really apply here since the original inventors gave up control of the system some decades ago, and the various committees in charge have all embraced internationalization.

      So, I'm not irritated with the inventors -- far from it! I'm quite pleased with DNS, as my memory for numbers is horrid. Heh. However, I am irritated with people who uphold the idea that alternate character sets have no place in DNS (or any other computing system, really).

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you been hiding under a rock the last years?
      Alternate characters in DNS names exist since well over a year now.

    4. Re:Huh? by tuxguy · · Score: 1

      Okay, your point makes sense :) Perhaps we should get the people who now upkeep DNS to add in support for those alternate character sets though instead of figuring out a way aorund it (Though in the mean time, a way around it is ok for me).

      --
      "I don't really care if they label me a Jesus Freak / There aint no disguising the truth!" - DC Talk
    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      • a bunch of seperate internets connected togethor by an intercontinental WAN
      Isn't that what it already is? A bunch of localized networks connected by WAN?
  34. just typical isolationism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sadly, they actually think they're better off not socializing with the uncivilized world.

    This is their achilles heel.

  35. Firewall this lesbian porn, will yuh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can have my Lesbians after you pry them from my cold dead harddrive.

    Fo shizzle, my teazer-nitzle; it be better than a hobbity jedi on stilt-sles-ing...est..er. Just see the teezer damnit!

  36. It could be abused. by yog · · Score: 1
    From the article:
    The Director General of CNNIC, Mao Wei, said, "We have already established a framework of registrars nationwide in China, and we and our registrars have been very active in assisting corporations in China, in particular the small and medium enterprises, to understand the need to claim their domain name resources that are completely in Chinese characters.
    I suspect that the submitter was implying that by creating their own government-managed "framework" of registrars, the Chinese government can track everyone who registers a domain name domestically, or anyone else who uses these new names, for that matter.

    The article did not state that they were going to use this as a means of control, but rather (as you suggested) as a means of empowering English-challenged domestic businesspeople.

    I'm a bit suspicious of their motives, because business people in east Asia, including now the PRC, simply have to know English. It's not like the rest of the world is about to learn Chinese characters, though that is a very fine aspiration that I wholly support and approve of (I was a Chinese major and did a master's degree in Chinese history).

    Keep in mind that the registrar can turn you off if they don't like you. Just snip and you're offline. It's one simple step from there to banning the domestic registration of English language domain names. The Chinese government is a pretty dastardly organization; I would not put much past them. The Chinese people deserve much better but it looks like it's gonna be a lot of years before much changes.

    --
    it's = "it is"; its = possessive. E.g., it's flapping its wings.
  37. "Chinese" does not mean just PROC. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    There are right now three Chinese nations: the People's Republic, Taiwan, and Singapore. (No, I will not count "occupied Tibet" because it is ethnically not China). Doing this will not "filter out" those from these countries, as well as other members of the Chinese diasporah worldwide.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:"Chinese" does not mean just PROC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I will not count "occupied Tibet" because it is ethnically not China

      In Tibet, occupied or not, most people speak Tibetan, not Chinese.

      Sheesh.

    2. Re:"Chinese" does not mean just PROC. by jiawen · · Score: 1

      Singapore is Chinese? This will come as a real shock to all the Malay people who make up the majority of the population there, as well as the various South Asian folks and others.

      Singapore is a multi-cultural society. Many people there speak Chinese, but this doesn't mean Singapore is Chinese any more than Chinatown makes San Francisco a sovereign territory of the PRC.

    3. Re:"Chinese" does not mean just PROC. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but get your facts right. Singapore is at least 55 percent to 60 percent majority Chinese. The Singapore government is quite paranoid about maintaining that "numerical superiority" and have resorted to encouraging a large number of qualified (not sure how that process is like) mainland Chinese to immigrate to the country.
      For a good read on Singapore under the shiny veneer of wealth and prosperity, read Wired Issue #1 "Disneyland with a Death Sentence". It was so "controversial" that the Singapore govt. banned it outright. Perhaps you can find a copy of it at your local library.

    4. Re:"Chinese" does not mean just PROC. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "In Tibet, occupied or not, most people speak Tibetan, not Chinese"

      This is one of many reasons Tibet is not really Chinese. However, as long as a foreign army from Beijing is occupying it and declaring it is their own, there is a point of view that "Tibet is part of China" that does exist somewhere.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    5. Re:"Chinese" does not mean just PROC. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Singapore is Chinese? This will come as a real shock to all the Malay people who make up the majority of the population there"

      The other person said that Singapore is more than 55% ethnic Chinese? Which of you are right? Regardless, the point is taken. I should have left it off the list, or modified it as a "Chinese culturally-dominated country".

      "San Francisco a sovereign territory of the PRC."

      Last time I knew, the PRC rules with an iron hand over its territories and colonial possessions (like Tibet). The idea of a sovereign colony of theirs is an oxymoron.

      Regardless, I should have left it off the list.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  38. Re:stupid gooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they should start with GGAA. Of course, they would still have their anuses conquered by GNAA.

    This should be very interesting indeed.

  39. The 60's called by inflex · · Score: 1

    They want their paranoia back.

    All this really is is simply a useful extention to an existing facility. Trust someone to turn it around and turn it into some sort of fearful conspiracy theory just because it's to do with China.

    1. Re:The 60's called by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The 60's called. They want their paranoia back.

      Was Tiananmen Square in the 60s? No.
      Was the Navy EP-3 midair crash in the 60s? No.

      While you can argue that localized domain names are not much of an issue and that things are being blown way out of proportion, it is asinine to declare that the days of being wary of communist china are long gone. When the chinese citizens can vote anyone out of office then we can revisit the trust issue.

    2. Re:The 60's called by inflex · · Score: 1


      Don't forget, China isn't the -only- country with smears on its history. The United States also has a dirty history, as do most countries, communist, marxist, democratic/republic or otherwise.

      We could get into a "my list is bigger than your list" debate here but I see little point.

    3. Re:The 60's called by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When the US Govt. has starved a number of it's own citizens that reaches seven figures, come on back with your point.

    4. Re:The 60's called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      When the US Govt. has starved a number of it's own citizens that reaches seven figures, come on back with your point.
      Smart of you to limit the US starving of people to "its own citizens". It's much cleaner that way, as it leaves out the starving of quite a few hundred thousand Iraqis since the beginning of the US sanctions in the early 90's.

      But it's too late -- you win. The determining criteria in this discussion is that "only countries that have starved seven figures out of their own people are eligible to qualify as countries with a dirty history."
    5. Re:The 60's called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we can safely conclude from this thread that patriots are idiots.

    6. Re:The 60's called by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, China isn't the -only- country with smears on its history.

      True, but we are not discussing who has smears on their history. We are discussing whether there is any evidence that the lack of trust from cold war days is no longer warranted.

    7. Re:The 60's called by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Smart of you to limit the US starving of people to "its own citizens". It's much cleaner that way, as it leaves out the starving of quite a few hundred thousand Iraqis since the beginning of the US sanctions in the early 90's.

      Uh, the US didn't starve those people. Saddam starved those people. He impeded United Nations inspectors. He diverted Unitied Nations Oil For Food money. He manufactured his people's suffering so that he could use them for propoganda. He went on a palace building spree. He spent money on weapons systems.

      Whether or not the US invasion was justified is one topic, don't let any hard feeling you have about that delude you regarding what Saddam did to his people.

    8. Re:The 60's called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a very one-dimensional way of looking at things. What you say is true: but it is also true that American sanctions on Iraq made Saddam's barbary all the more, well, barbaric.

      It's the whole murderer for hire thing: a man who kills others for money and on a regular basis could be rightly said to be lacking somewhat in moral fiber. However, the fact that he is an "evil" man does not magically free the one who hires him to kill from responsibility for a victim's death.

      The United States has an unfortunate history of supporting rather questionably sane dictators. The Iraq example is all the rage now because of the war, but Latin America is replete with examples of this behaviour that are arguably much worse. People like Saddam and Pinochet were assholes, of course. But don't start patting yourself on the back just yet. We are largely responsible (even if indirectly) for much of the damage they did.

      Of course, bringing this back on topic, the CCP (particularly before Deng Xiao Ping) certainly did make a number of, hmm, "poor" decisions. China's current government, like all governments mostly free from public accountability, certainly has the power to regress to its former authoritarian self at will.

      But I don't see that happening.

      Truth be told, China's current government is much more free (in the sense that it mostly allows its people to do what they want, within reason) than many other governments in the world that receive no such criticism (I'm particularly thinking of Singapore, here). Singapore of course doesn't get any flack from us because it's a capitalist haven -- and once most of the western world realizes that the days of Mao's little red book are long gone, we'll forgive China's transgressions for exactly the same reasons. Don't misread me here, I don't think this is right, but China is really a very nice place and 90% of the criticism it gets is misplaced propaganda left over from the cold war.

      I live and work in the PRC, and have for 3 years. I've also lived and worked in Singapore. I think I'm as qualified as any to make the comparison. Both are nice places to live, as far as it goes, but Singapore is a veritable police state.

      China is really pretty laid back.

      I think people who are concerned about this should get out more.

    9. Re:The 60's called by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paranoid? Maybe just informed. I used to have a job that I can not talk about. I have a fallout shelter and other preperations for bad things. Not because I am "paranoid", but, because I had access to certain information.

    10. Re:The 60's called by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      What you say is true: but it is also true that American sanctions on Iraq made Saddam's barbary all the more, well, barbaric

      Wrong, United Nations sanctions.

      It's the whole murderer for hire thing ...

      Wrong, unlike your hypothetical murderer the intent of the United Nations and the Unites States was to avoid harm. We even went to extreme measure by creating the Oil for Food program.

      Don't misread me here, I don't think this is right, but China is really a very nice place and 90% of the criticism it gets is misplaced propaganda left over from the cold war. I live and work in the PRC, and have for 3 years. I've also lived and worked in Singapore. I think I'm as qualified as any to make the comparison.

      I disagree. Your stay in the PRC is most likely largely favorable because of the wonderful people you interacted with. The people are not the problem, their government is. The government is every bit as dangerous as Pinochet and Saddam. The government is merely functioning, today, as a benevolant dictator, in some respects. Again, Tiannamen was not that long ago. From the US perspective the Navy EP-3 midair collision demonstrates that the cold war era suspicion of their government is still warranted. The Chinese people deserve much better.

      As for Singapore, that's a different topic and their excesses to not justify or mitigate communist China's.

  40. root server load by keithmoore · · Score: 1

    now the legitimate root servers will be flooded with queries for these illegitimate top-level domains, as the names leak outside China, or people within China who attempt to use those names with software that hasn't been upgraded or configured to use the alternate root servers.

  41. Respectfully... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if you don't remember pre-WWW, if you don't remember when GOPHER was the hot shit of the moment, if you don't remember when you had to go to COLLEGE to even HAVE an internet account, not to mention wasting entire years of that same college on a zenith vt-100 or vt-52, if you don't remember printing ASCII pr0n on a daisy-wheel print terminal and trying not to get caught by the lab supervisors, if you don't remember when MUDs were the only form of online gameplay in existence, and if you don't remember alt.tom-servo-taught-me-how-to-newgroup, in short if you don't remember the internet as ASCII text then you remember exactly jack fucking shit about the glory days of the fucking internet.

    Welcome to Tuesday, you ignorant bitch.

  42. With a little elbow grease by tofucubes · · Score: 1

    Microsoft might be able to cut a deal here with the chinese government: maybe the black box, microsoft is planning, can be beefed up and not as optional for china...and then they might actually charge some people in china for windows, you just in case the chinese officials don't like someone.

    --
    Some people believe 1-1=3 and for the sake of being politically correct, we should respect their differences
    1. Re:With a little elbow grease by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe slashdot could cut a deal first. Just agree to post links to Chinese dissident websites on slashdot, and viola! No more access.

  43. Turnaround by iendedi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How so, this would lock out people outside of China, not inside China. I don't have any chinese character set installed on my pc, and I would not have a way of typing in that domain name.
    I was thinking the same thing, actually. This shouldn't affect anyone inside of China attempting to access sites outside of China. But how does this affect those outside of China resolving addresses inside of China? Does it matter?

    In this day and age, I believe that you would probably be watched closer if you were american and looking at chinese sites than if you were chinese and looking at american sites. Propaganda is such a strange thing.
    --

    It is your personal duty to fight for what is right on a daily basis. Ignoring injustice is identical to approving
    1. Re:Turnaround by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      In this day and age, I believe that you would probably be watched closer if you were american and looking at chinese sites than if you were chinese and looking at american sites.

      Similarly, in the 1930's, 40's, and 50's, you would be watched more closely if you were an American and looking into Soviet Gulags than you would if you were a Russian and looking at American amusement parks.

  44. Its not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they won't have to share The Office.

    I'm sorry if you Brit Tv fans, and moderators, disagree, I think its the most over-rated show ever.

    What I wouldn't give for a little Chinese Government censorship to save me from this shit.

    1. Re:Its not so bad by Craig_P92669 · · Score: 1

      I agree.....Coupling was much better, if only NBC had just imported the original instead of trying to replicate it.

      --
      http://xs4.xs.to/pics/04481/p556222.gif
    2. Re:Its not so bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd say mod parent up, but what are the odds of people being aware of Coupling? And of seeking it out if they work out what it is?

  45. Not Cantonese by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 0
    As far as I know (from Chinese friends) the written language in China is Vernacular Chinese (or just Chinese) and Cantonese is a spoke language (and only one of many in China, however it seems to be a popular one even though the official language is Mandarin). You see in China they have the same written language but different pronunciations (think Jamaican (patwan) and American) depending on the region. So my friend from one region can't understand another one who speaks in Cantonese (and came from Hong Kong).

    more on Chinese.

  46. Wacky pro-English conservatives by alienmole · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's the only explanation I can think of for the spin on the Slashdot posting. I think it's a legitimate question to raise, but to present it with the headline "China Locks in its Net-Citizenry" is just ludicrous, and extremely inflammatory. Only on Slashdot, where the term "editor" has a unique definition. Timothy ought to be ashamed of himself.

  47. I just hate these so many domain name schemes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The chinese domain name registry, saying it's trying to protect your brands in all ways when it invents these different domain name schemes, is in fact destroying every possibility for you to protect any of them. In US, you need only one name: google.com; in Britain, you need only one name: bbc.co.uk. A Chinese company need much more, lenovo.com, lenovo.com.cn, lenovo.cn, .cn, ., maybe much more.... I don't believe all companies will remember to register all these names. It seems those phishing guys will be the biggest winner of this policy, the second winner, are those Chinese domain name registering companies -- they will earn 5 times of money from a single company compared to their unfortunate fellows in other parts of the world.

  48. Just tried to register a domain... by L0stb0Y · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ok, speaking pretty good Chinese, and for an experiment I just went through the process of registering a domain with these guys-

    Interesting things about the process:

    When you are registering, they state that the Chinese government has 30 days to reject your domain...maybe to keep domains they don't like the sound of from going live...

    They force you to a min of 2 years, and the cost is $125.00 - when you register a domain, they give you the domain plus the domain.cn as well (they call it a 'free gift')-

    After you register a domain they tell you that you have to install their software for your browser (no Mozilla, only IE)- With the plugin installed your new domain won't crap out when you type in characters (either GB or BIG5)-

    I'll post an update in my /. journal of the process - what happens, etc....

    Should be interesting at the very least to see what happens with this...

    --
    "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
    1. Re:Just tried to register a domain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...they tell you that you have to install their software for your browser (no Mozilla, only IE)

      I thought the Chinese were promoting Linux these days? This looks more like a major Windows lock-in than any sort of censorship.

    2. Re:Just tried to register a domain... by 2Bits · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, that's not true. Please provide the name of the registrar where you tried to register your domain. You probably get scammed by some unknown registrar outside of China.

      I own 2 chinese domain names (one for .com, the other for .cn). The registration fee is the same everywhere in China, namely, 280 RMB/year. That price is set by the government.

      And no, you don't need any other software. What's wrong with your Firefox/Mozilla?

      The only problem is, the government does not allow personal chinese domain name (registered by individuals for individuals), only corporations/organizations/institutions, etc.

    3. Re:Just tried to register a domain... by akadruid · · Score: 1

      From my reading of the grandparent, he got two domain names

      Domain 1 in the form yourchoice.newextension
      Domain 2 in the form yourchoice.newextension.cn

      Domain 1 is not a regular domain at all.
      Domain 2 is a subdomain of one belonging to this new registrar.

      I imagine the plugin is required for the new extension to work, in the same way as those con-artists over at new.net do it.

      --
      "Those who cast the votes decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything." (attrib. Joseph Stalin)
    4. Re:Just tried to register a domain... by L0stb0Y · · Score: 1

      These are not the .cn or the .com names, they are pure Hanzi domains, already in use in China. From the article on slashdot yesterday....

      LosT

      --
      "We are the music makers, and we are the dreamers of dreams."
  49. C&C:G by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 1

    I couldn't help but be reminded of the China faction in the game Command & Conquer: Generals, which have a unit called the Hacker with the humorous ability of "hacking" money out of thin air. ;)

  50. "Lock in"? by sydneyfong · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rather, say the InterNIC locks in the whole world by forcing netizens to use English characters!

    There is no reason why people have to learn English to use the internet efficiently, especially where there's more people speaking Chinese (Mandarin) than English.

    That's lock in.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
    1. Re:"Lock in"? by Ph33r+th3+g(O)at · · Score: 1

      If Red China had invented the Internet, there'd be something for them to complain about if it were primarily an English medium. But they didn't.

      --
      I too have felt the cold finger of injustice.
    2. Re:"Lock in"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, it's only Slashdot doing the complaining, and we all know where they're are from.

      How about this:
      - China "invents" Chinese-enabled DNS
      - Slashdot complains

      Yeah, and we all know Al Gore invented the internet.

    3. Re:"Lock in"? by keithmoore · · Score: 1

      I agree with the idea that everyone should be able to use the Internet in his native language. And I have no problem with using IDNs - actually I was involved in the discussions that led to the standardization and tried to minimize the potential for IDNs to break existing applications. But this action by China was taken rather recklessly and apparently without regard for the likely consequences. Having multiple roots with inconsistent sets of TLDs will lead to interoperability problems, as will a reliance on MSIE plugins. And given China's history it's hard to imagine that they'll resist the temptation to try to use their DNS roots to further limit access and/or redirect traffic to sites of their own choosing (similar to what Verisign did with SiteFinder).

      This is a dangerous precedent. If the official root servers don't start handling queries for the Chinese TLDs it will create headaches for operators and application writers and might even result in widespread international pressure to have ITU take over domain management (if you thought ICANN was bad, just wait!). If the official root servers do start handling queries for these TLDs it will encourage other countries to set up their own TLDs, with less drastic but still undesirable consequences for DNS performance worldwide.

  51. For those of you who don't see the lock-in coming by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    For half of the equation, let me ask a question --

    How many people does it take to have a conversation?

    Now, for the other half of the equation, let me propose a (set of) filter rule(s) --

    Accesses to approved Chinese TLDs can go down one circuit and accesses to other TLDs can go down another.

    Do I have to invoke the old equal-but-separate argument here?

    Things clearing up yet?

    If the Chinese government were doing this to make things more accessible for their people, they would not be stopping with defining the new rogue TLDs. They would be cooperating with ICANN to dynamically translate their Han TLDs to the ipidgin equivalents, .com and .net . Lack of mention of such dynamic translation is what would have me reach for the tinfoil.

    Now, if they REALLY wanted to show that they are not just trying to wall off things at the language boundary, they would be announcing plans to make it possible to cross the boundary. That would be fairly simple. When their registrars sell a 2LD name, they could sell the name as an aliased pair, both a Han name and a Latin name for the price of one. In the general case, the user would have them both pointing to the same IP.

    punycode, if they are indeed using it, will cause them a lot of grief.

  52. If you can't speak Chinese by phorm · · Score: 1

    Chances are that a website with a Chinese URL isn't going to be of much use to you. Even if you could figure out the URL, chances are the pages would also be in Chinese and you wouldn't be able to read them. Of course, if you can understand enough Chinese to read the pages, then you can probably understand enough to type in the URL's...

  53. Taiwan = .tw, FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    jkdfalskjdf

  54. Re:For those of you who don't see the lock-in comi by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    L0stb0Y points out that they are providing pairs, so to speak, in the pattern of &#21517;&#23383;.&#20844;&#21496; being mapped to &#21517;&#23383;.&#20844;&#21496;.cn .

    That raises a lot more questions. If they've done it (sort of) right, what the plug-in would do is simply tag the .cn after the Han domain name (and some other essential bookkeeping and lookup). Except that in the case of .&#20013;&#22269; , they would also be washing the .&#20013;&#22269; pseudo-TLD.

    You could do a similar thing within a large organization, such that addresses that resolve within the organization would automatically assume the TLD and 2LD, so that blackbeard.pirates.org would resolve internally by just typing "blackbeard". In fact, many internal domain name servers are set up that way by default, aren't they? And these guys are providing general names without any particular TLD.

    Speaking of separate but equal, when is slashdot going to be upgraded to allowing general Unicode in the posts?
  55. No lock-out, either by ragingmime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...newly-government approved Chinese names of the form . (i.e. 'name.gongsi') and . (i.e 'name.wangluo')... The purchase of Simplified Chinese names from the i-DNS.net/CNNIC partnership will automatically allow the corresponding web-site to be accessed by an equivalent, computer-generated domain name in Traditional Chinese characters (i.e. used in Hong Kong and Taiwan) free of charge. Conversely, one can also buy a Traditional Chinese name directly and get an automatically assigned Simplified Chinese version free.

    Maybe I'm missing something, but it sounds like a non-Chinese user could type in .gongsi or .wangluo instead of traditional Chinese characters and get the same website. In other words, this system doesn't lock users in or out... I really don't see how this is that big of deal. Not to be a jerk, but do the editors read these articles? I'm not a very big fan of China's internet policies myself, but the newspost's threats of lock-in are totally unfounded.

    --
    I produce electronic music and write little games. Have a look.
    1. Re:No lock-out, either by Klortho · · Score: 1

      No, name.gongsi is not the same as name.. "Gongsi" is just the phonetic spelling.

  56. Re:For those of you who don't see the lock-in comi by amerinese · · Score: 1
    uh... do you have a one to one mapping of chinese characters to latin alphabet? because if you do, you should tell the chinese about it.

    you have to consider syllable complexity--there are many fewer kinds of syllables in chinese--as well as the homophone problem--there are a ton of characters, which carry different meanings, sitting on all the same characters.

    for these reasons, everytime someone non-Chinese makes the news for the first time, they need to invent a name for him/her. there's no one way to do it, and you end up with meaning and sound variations.

  57. China Locks in its Net-Citizenry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    >What at first might look like a localization issue could potentially become a powerfull user lock-in and turn out to be a very effective addition to The Great Chinese Filtering.

    Oh, no! The evil communist government is forcing the Chinese to use their own language on the Internet! We must stop them before the idea spreads and other ethnic groups begin to think that they too can read and write their own language on the Internet instead of the divinely mandated (the Deity being American , of course) English language!

    This just in "Chinese people forced to eat Chinese food".

  58. The Reason for China's Increasing Censorship by mas5353 · · Score: 0

    As we have seen from recent Slashdot postings [1][2], China (or the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) rather) has been increasing it's internet censorship. But what for? It turns out that CCP membership is in drastic decline. It is estimated that there are about 50 million members and according to international newspaper The Epoch Times (English)(Chinese), over one million of them have issued written statements of withdrawal. This has occurred over the past two months at a rate of over 20,000 per day. This is thought to be a direct cause of a published compilation of articles, Nine Commentaries on the Chinese Communist Party which provides a critical analysis of the CCP and it's last 80 years of leading the Peoples Republic of China (PRC). This past weekend, a parade was held in New York to celebrate this milestone and the potential future of China.

    --
    How long must we be a victim of fate and circumstance?
    As long as it takes to change our minds.
  59. What is up with all this xenophobia? by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    Starting with the article title itself this whole thread is swarmed with utter paranoia.
    If anybody took the time to read the article, it did say that there is a two-way free translation service between traditional and simplified characters. And, if you noticed, it implied that the traditional character registry was going to be handled outside the mainland. Now, for the numerous people who have posted their credentials to understand the difference between traditional and simplified characters, how in the farthest extremes of the imagination can you call that lock-in?

  60. Just another way to make money by smeenz · · Score: 1
    This is just another scam to make money, just like they do with new (pointless) third level domains.

    From TFA "We strongly suggest that companies in Singapore, particularly those with global or mainland China directed aspirations, to quickly lock in their business names and trademarks as Chinese domain names, before they find them legitimately taken by others"

  61. No need for a one-to-one mapping by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    The Chinese registrars would "simply" (ahem) have two DNS entries per IP address. The customer would choose the latin version of the domain name. In an ideal world, dns aliasing would be de-aliased by each host, but since that hasn't happened yet the registrars would be required to maintain the database. It wouldn't be too complex, would it? (wishful thinking?) But I have not been able to figure out any other way to prevent internationalized domain names from forming a communication barrier by means of the ability of humans to read the address.

    1. Re:No need for a one-to-one mapping by amerinese · · Score: 1

      actually now that i think about it, the first problem i mentioned is a problem from english->chinese so it's not really a problem. the second one, the homophone problem, is a legitimate problem. basically, there would have to be a way for deciding who gets which latin pair for a given chinese character address. there would be quite a few conflicts, in which case, one site would get the transliteration and the other site(s) would have to choose something else. but maybe it doesn't matter, just let people register whatever latin name they want with whatever character name they want--but of course that could be pretty misleading too. i'm just saying it's a complex issue and there's no unique natural latin pair for a given chinese string--a good reason for why they want to use characters for domain names in the first place.

    2. Re:No need for a one-to-one mapping by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

      heh. Yeah, I know it's hard to read, I just forgot I had used the HTML Formatted.

      Anyway, yes, the only thing I can think to do is have the user chose his own latinized domain name.

      The registrar might provide a dictionary of suggested translations and a list of suggestions that haven't already been taken. But the customer would have to choose the actual latinization.

      However, if they are going to hide the .cn from those who access within China, that would make it rather awkward to map the TLDs to the latin/English equivalents.

  62. Because it IS Slashdot? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    You know, the place where the world is divided neatly into comfy extreme categories.

    Intel = evil
    AMD = good
    Windows = evil
    Linux = good
    MS = double-plus-evil
    Sun = good
    Apple = double-plus-good

    And of course, "China = double-plus-evil".

    It's a comfy system. One doesn't have to actually engage the brains or anything. If it's about China or MS, it _must_ be some nefarious, sinister plot. Even if the new piece was, oh, say, that China funds some research into curing cancer or AIDS, it _must_ involve some Fu Manchu kind of villain cackling manically over a plan to use it to enslave the population.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Because it IS Slashdot? by daeley · · Score: 1

      There is no evil. There is only ungood. As in "Your use of newspeak is double-plus-ungood." ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  63. Ah, situational ethics. How cute. by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    An action is just the same action, regardless of who does it. Good is good even if China or MS does it, and evil is still the same evil even is Apple or Google were to do it.

    Judging an action by who did it, rather than for what it _is_, is the apex of stupidity and hypocrisy.

    The PRC is evil, yes, but localizing web pages and URLs is _not_.

    Every single western nation has its own localized URLs. E.g., as a random example, a German TV station's URL is "www.prosieben.de". They didn't translate it into "proseven" or some other english-sounding stuff for you. And, surprise, the site is in German too. Go figure.

    It's only normal. Germans are more comfortable reading and writing German than English. French are more comfortable in French. Swedes are more comfortable in Swedish. And, surprise, the Chinese are better at reading and writing in Chinese.

    If a Chinese person wants to find the site for, say, "The Beijing News" (made up newspaper name, I don't know if one actually exists like that), they'll be more likely to try it in chinese than to first translate it into English and/or transliterate it into 7 bit ASCII. There is no evil plot or conspiracy theory necessary to understand that.

    There's nothing even China-speciffic about that. I would venture a guess that any other country with its own alphabet, has people who are more comfortable in that alphabet. That would include Japan, Greece, most arab countries, Russia, Ukraine, Korea (even south Korea), Taiwan, etc.

    Some of those are very modern western countries. E.g., I haven't heard any "Great Firewall" stuff about Greece. (Although, there was that misguided ending up forbidding video games too when they tried to forbid gambling. But then it just shows that politicians are... politicians. Everywhere.)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  64. Well, this makes up for Slashdot... by jiawen · · Score: 1

    ...which doesn't allow posting in non-English characters. !

  65. Groan!! by jandersen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Oh, for fscks sake, get a grip now. Every time its about China we see this stupid paranoia; I'm sick of it, to be honest. What's going to be next? 'Chinese rice harvest record high - could this be a new plot to suppress freedom of speech?'

    You Americans (or to be more precise: citizens of USA, since America is so much than USA) keep blabbing on about freedom, freedom, freedom. You know what I use to say? If you're starving, all you think of is food, if you're thirsty, all you think about is drinks. So why do you go on about freedom? Need I say more?

    1. Re:Groan!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know...

      Why do the french go on about wine?

      Maybe they got it right? Maybe they want to share their greatness in a particular area with those that no little about it?

      Believe it or not, not everything in this word comes down to a single cute word association game. Perhapse instead of saying more, you could have said less in this instance. Sure you free too say what you did, but why make yourself look stupid for no reason?

  66. "We're not perfect, but who is?"... excuse? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Well there are always sinister plots happening *somewhere*. I have to wonder about the real motivations of the people who keep pushing this China bashing?

    Perhaps they just don't like the fact that they (the government, not the Chinese people) manipulate and oppress their own citizens via a dictatorship which is not (and was never) communism, and is not really free-market capitalism either. If the labour market isn't free, it's not a "free" market.

    The PRC are not perfect, but neither is the government of any powerful nation. Some just have better PR than others.

    Someone help me out here; there must be a name for this form of argument. Namely, "A isn't perfect, but neither is B, so that implicitly excuses A". Let's ignore that while B is far from perfect, A may be an order of magnitude worse.

    I'm not American, and I'll apologise to no-one for my dislike of Bush and his warmongering, blatantly self-serving and unashamedly greedy and parasitic cronies. And as far as PR goes, I can tell you that the Bush administration doesn't impress many people (power-blinded politicians excepted) outside the United States. PR is mainly directed inwards; I'm sure that from a Chinese person's perspective, the Chinese government are made to look far better than the US.

    But if you think that this somehow excuses the general behaviour of the Chinese government (who I still consider to be an order of magnitude worse, although nowhere near as evil as they were in Mao's day), then you are mistaken.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  67. "yellow" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In Mandarin porn is huang2de, or yellow.
    Same pronunciation as "imperial", but that is a different character. Lots of puns there.

  68. Filtering by Abstract_Me · · Score: 0

    Yes there are some who hate the filters implemanted around the world. but i think sometimes we forget that having access to our media shouldn't be the definition of freedom... I think the people under these filters are probly beter off not knowing that Jackson's ex-wife set to testify in trial.

    I recently wrote a paper on the subject and in my research found that the majority of people under filters (60%+) did not mind the filters or felt there should be MORE filtering.

    I am normally the first person to fight for anothers rights especially on topics such as freedom of information. but writing that paper opened my eyes to that fact that not everybody thinks our information is as important as we like to think.

  69. Standards are a beautiful thing by hqm · · Score: 1

    If each country has incompatible data interchange protocols, then we cannot exchange information with them. If China is moving their citizens slowly to an alternate internet (one with domain names that cannot be accessed by the external world), then they are isolating their citizens.

    It takes a lot of careful work to make Internet standards actually function. It only takes one move by some network provider in order to seriously break the protocols. Witness the Verisgin domain wildcard hijacking last year...

  70. You may make some valid points in your post, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's hard to take you seriously if you don't even know the difference between "its" and "it's".

  71. Registar by StringBlade · · Score: 1
    Registar is a close relative to the Sinistar.

    When they were just infants, nothing more than swirling balls of gas, the were separated and Sinistar took the path of eating passing spaceships where as Registar went on to become the largest purveyor of domain names in the universe.

    That is, until Network Associates bought it out.

    --
    ...and that's the way the cookie crumbles.
    1. Re:Registar by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good plot for a book. However, I will wait for the DVD. :-)

  72. Brilliantly Machiavellian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What at first might look like a localization issue could potentially become a powerfull user lock-in and turn out to be a very effective addition to The Great Chinese Filtering

    How so, this would lock out people outside of China, not inside China. I don't have any chinese character set installed on my pc, and I would not have a way of typing in that domain name.

    If I owned a company in China, and wanted to do buisness in other countries, I would not want a domain with just Chinese characters, my non-Chinese customers would have a more difficult time finding me.

    I just don't see how this locks Chinese people into anything. It gives them more choice.

    Because these are not compliant domain names. Called ml.ml in the biz, they won't work outside of China. So by taking a nationalistic stand for all chinese characters, the gov't also over time walls off Chinese users from the rest of the Internet world. Over time they could sell the impression that ALL other types of domain names are FOREIGN, and a good Chinese user only uses chinese characters. Brilliant.

    Of course I don't think users should be forced to use English, and ICANN's incredible delay in adopting IDN standards is partly to blame. But this COULD accomplish what the Chinese gov't has always wanted, and would do it through behavior modification, rather than brute force.

    I missed this announcement, many thanks to the original poster.

    AC

  73. No Chinese Spam Here by MarkByers · · Score: 1

    The vast majority of spam is sent by an American, is written in English, and is advertising for an American company. I do not see why suddenly this will change because of this news.

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
  74. Wrong, I am. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Wrong, I am. I even read that Wired article when it first came out.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.