Slashdot Mirror


Second Round of Serenity Screenings Sold Out

j1ggl3x writes "From a Rotten Tomatoes news article: 'Following the sell-out success of the May 5th pre-screenings, creator Joss Whedon recently announced that more advance previews of his movie Serenity would appear at twenty theaters in twenty cities, this time on May 26th. By the next morning, well before the official list of cities was posted, fans on the Serenity movie site and elsewhere had diligently located half the listings through trial and error and several of the locations were already sold out. Serenity hits theaters on September 30th.'"

199 comments

  1. hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Serenity now!

    FP

    1. Re:hah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hoochey Mama!

  2. Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by blonde+rser · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good thing fox cancelled Firefly. There's clearly no public interest in that franchise.

    1. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Sancho · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The question will be whether die-hard fans will be the ONLY ones who see the show when it gets a wide release. The show pretty clearly had a huge fanbase (given the record sales on Amazon and pre-screenings that sell out before they're announced) but even if every fan sees the movie once, it won't be enough to warrant a sequel if no one else sees it.

      I was lucky enough to attend one of the first 10 screenings. I think the film is good enough to make it on its own except for the character development. Firefly fans won't have a problem here, but with 9 characters to deal with, there just isn't enough time in a 2 hour movie to really introduce them all, much less give any real information about them which would let them shine. I hope this doesn't detract from the film for the general audience.

    2. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by rijrunner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Let's see... 1 million Dvd's sold in a day at an average of $40 per set..

      5 million sold since it has been released.

      So, Fox has made somewhere around $200 million off that series so far..

      Most companies consider $200 million a fairly decent amount to make off a series that has had a multiyear run.. For a show that was cancelled before it even got a run is pretty far removed from the norm.

      You really need to do that math, but that would require a bit more processing than you seem to be able to manage.

      This particlar vocal sub-group put a lot of money on the table.

      Networks are in the "Make Money" business. Fox and a number of other networks now make more off the DVD sales on a series than on the broadcast of the series.

    3. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Tarcastil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My sister managed to get me a ticket, too. I'd seen only a few episodes prior and thought the movie was amazing. I agree that for the main characters, though, there's little character development. Maybe it's Joss's plan to get more people into the TV series by making it necessary to see the show for a full understanding of the movie.

    4. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Wow, five million sets? Is there some way to corroborate that? Not that I disbelieve it, as it does seem to be selling pretty well.

    5. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by DarkTempes · · Score: 4, Funny

      the general film audience likes character development?

      i thought they just liked explosions and sex.

    6. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've just discovered the market forces behind OAVs.

      Congratufuckilations

    7. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by MaineCoon · · Score: 3, Informative

      You seem to forget - $40 is the MSRP. Wholesale is around $20. Production, distribution, etc will eat up about $5.

      That works out to $15 profit per set, and doesn't include other potential expenses, so if 5 million sets were sold, that's only $75 million.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    8. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Shea_Butter · · Score: 2
      Let's see... 1 million Dvd's sold in a day at an average of $40 per set.. 5 million sold since it has been released. So, Fox has made somewhere around $200 million off that series so far.. Most companies consider $200 million a fairly decent amount to make off a series that has had a multiyear run.. For a show that was cancelled before it even got a run is pretty far removed from the norm. You really need to do that math, but that would require a bit more processing than you seem to be able to manage.
      Not to flame, but it's pretty obvious that you don't understand sarcasm. Just to give you a little hint, it's when someone says something that they don't really mean. Usually they depend on some sort of obvious fact that would make what they said idiotic to indicate that they are employing it. Hope you find this helpful...
    9. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by HillaryWBush · · Score: 1

      Errr, is it possible that (well, considering that FOX must have known there are millions of obsessive fans of the show)...well, that they killed it specifically as a marketing technique to sell DVDs? I mean, considering 'n all how they make almost nothing off showing it to you for free. Um, sorry I said anything..i'll go back and sleep under my bridge now. Thank you

    10. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      Which means:

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0379786/business

      "budget $40,000,000 (estimated)"

      Throw in an average ticket price of $5 and the thing has posted $35 million over its production costs....

      Just off its established fanbase.

    11. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      Well, the problem with satire and sarcasm these days is that it really is hard to find someone who is able to take satire outside the bounds of basic fanboy flaming a series they did not understand...

      Make a case they didn't mean it. You're also going to have to make a case that all the anonymous cowards are just goofing.. And, this is /. You've never seen someone make a serious idiotic post before?

    12. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by furiousgeorge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>so if 5 million sets were sold, that's only $75 million.

      did anybody here pass economics? Ok... how about at least TOOK economics?

      There's a big difference between revenue and profit.

      Going from the math above, fox POSSIBLY brought in $75 million for the DVD's (that's not counting promotional costs, etc etc).

      Did the shows cost nothing to produce? 14 episodes of a SciFi show.... i would bet $5million an episode is a reasonable estimate. Thats $70 million in costs right there. Plus marketing, blah blah blah.

      Yes the DVD has been a hit. In numbers. But you can't say it made fox a fortune. It more than likely is just covering the costs that the show LOST during its run.

    13. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      As a fan, I've been doing my part. I've been loaning out my DVDs to anyone who likes sci-fi. 100% positive feedback. Plus, they all plan on seeing the movie.

      If you want Firefly to come back, you have to get more people interested in it.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    14. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Average ticket price of 5$?

      Movie rentals are 4.50 these days, how the heck did you get an average of 5? I say it's closer to 8$.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    15. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1m each, if I recall right. Farscape at that time was the most expensive show made, at ~1.5m/ep

    16. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      Fox and a number of other networks now make more off the DVD sales on a series than on the broadcast of the series.

      And people wonder why the networks aren't behind P2P/BitTorrent.

    17. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Monkelectric · · Score: 5, Interesting
      well, that they killed it specifically as a marketing technique to sell DVDs?

      It is possible, and I like the way your conspiratorial mind works. However, they could have sold season 1 DVDs and still made a eason 2.

      The inside story is, that FireFly was the "baby" of an ousted executive. If FireFly did well then there would be all sorts of questions along the lines of "Why are were firing guys who are making hit shows?"

      The solution was well documented -- tank the show by showing them out of order, not advertising them, and then changing the show times so you couldn't catch them. I remember seeing the adverts on TV and going "that looks COOL!!" and then I couldn't find it.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    18. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      It probably is closer to $8. Just showing what a specific size fanbase will manage, if it has any loyalty..

    19. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      i thought they just liked explosions and sex.

      blinking lights...don't forget the blinking lights.

    20. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      We were talking DVD set sales, not movie sales.

      If its made even $40K (let alone 40M) off these screenings then those must be VERY expensive tickets.

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    21. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by MaineCoon · · Score: 1

      Read grandparent post, I was rebutting his claim that the sale of 5 million DVD box sets at $40 made FOX $200mil profit. A gross miscalculation.

      I took 50% off for distributor, retail store claim off the MSRP to get a guestimate of wholesale price, counted $5 per box set for the production costs, assumed little marketting, and just gave a raw number, not taking into consideration the original production costs since it was a for-TV, not for-DVD, show (counting those as writeoffs or recouped, since the show did make at least one airing).

      Have you been reading the Nitpickers Guide to Slashdot?

      --
      Hunt your preferred prey at Aliens vs Predator MUD. Join the war at avpmud.com port 4000
    22. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Rentals are $4.50?!?! Where are you renting? I pay $2 (5 days), $3 for new releases (3 days). All this from a store with a huge selection, great service, and wonderful acquisitions policy.

      I have to agree that $5 is a bit short. That's closer to the average matinee or possibly student rate (gotta love my town, a college town near an army base and the only place in town doesn't offer discount for students or the military). I pay $5 by getting passes through AAA. Normal rates are closer to $7 or $7.50.

    23. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by goneutt · · Score: 1

      Netflix and a DVD burner.

      'nuff said

      --
      Bacardi + slashdot = negative karma.
    24. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      The GP was responding to an AC post that got (slightly unfairly) modded down to 0 (Troll), so you (presumably) didn't see it. That post was questioning the value of selling DVDs, on the basis that Fox is a broadcasting network.

      This is obviously bad reasoning (you can still make a shitload off DVDs regardless of your primary business method), so the GP post was correcting it.

      Remember kids, check your comment-indentations and browsing karma limits before assuming anything about a conversation...

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    25. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Snaller · · Score: 1

      The show pretty clearly had a huge fanbase (given the record sales on Amazon and pre-screenings that sell out before they're announced) but even if every fan sees the movie once, it won't be enough to warrant a sequel if no one else sees it.


      So you know how many fans there are?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    26. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Snaller · · Score: 2, Funny

      did anybody here pass economics?

      Yep, I walked past a class. Really hot chicks inside!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    27. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Snaller · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did the shows cost nothing to produce? 14 episodes of a SciFi show.... i would bet $5million an episode is a reasonable estimate. Thats $70 million in costs right there. Plus marketing, blah blah blah.

      Under two mill (and there was no marketing) - they made that back on the first run, but they wanted more, not just to break even.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    28. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by slapout · · Score: 1

      then changing the show times so you couldn't catch them

      Yet another reason to buy a TiVo... :-)

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    29. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by BreadMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> did anybody here pass economics? Ok... how about at least TOOK economics?

      In the patched-elbow world of economics, profits mean excess after cost + acceptable return for the investment. Given that line of thought, profits in an competitive market gravitate towards 0, meaning participants earn the acceptable return on investment, but no more.

      So, revenue > cost may not generate enough to cover the expected return for the risk involved; I don't know what type of return the industry expects from this sort of activity, so I can't say if Fox earned a profit (in the economic sense) or not.

      That said, show-business accounting is nortoriously shady, even productions with revenues far above cost show a loss on the company's books.

    30. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the advertising revenue made during the first run of the show on FOX. It's not like they received NO money for airing the program. They probably already had a profit right there. The DVD sales are almost pure gravy.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    31. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Yup. To the one.

      Ass.

    32. Re:Man, Fox really dodged a bullet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... not advertising them ... I remember seeing the adverts on TV ...


      Well... uh, something isn't quite right with your argument here...

  3. Re:guaranteed to fail by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, the selling out of these theaters before the list of theaters showing it was even out is a good indication that this movie will tank.

    --
    Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  4. I see a flaw in your reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You clearly expected something intelligent fox to come up with.

  5. Ticket Sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interestingly, no tickets have been sold at all in Jamestown.

    1. Re:Ticket Sales by Karma+Sucks · · Score: 1

      ITYM "Jaynestown". HTH, HAND.

      --
      (Please browse at -1 to read this comment.)
  6. Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Luigi30 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So has Fox dropped another franchise on its way to success? Are they going to pick the ball back up like they did with Family Guy?

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Naw. FOX only shows stuff like Family Guy. The lued, the crued. Firefly and Futurama are gone for good. Next up on the chopping block: Arrested Development and House MD.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    2. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Sancho · · Score: 4, Informative

      Universal currently has a contract to make (I believe) as many Firefly movies as they want (there are currently talks of having it be a trilogy). However no one can make a Firefly TV show for something like 3 years.. so maybe after that we'll see a revamp of the show, although Mutant Enemy would be fools to try to get it on Fox.

    3. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by sirsnork · · Score: 1

      The story I heard was Fox had exclusive access to TV rights for 10 years, so that would leave about 8 years.

      --

      Normal people worry me!
    4. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'm pretty sure it was Nathan Fillian who quoted 3 years (at one of the screenings), but don't quote me on that.

    5. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by rijrunner · · Score: 1

      Fox had a 10 year broadcast contract. That expires in 2011.

      Fillian might have been referring to the actor's contracts. That would be a different deal, but I do not know the terms of those.

    6. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      I suspect that Fillion meant that *Universal* was blocking the TV show for the next three years. I.e. for the next three years, Serenity can only appear on the big screen.

      Universal would have to be worried that Fox might renew the show and they'd lose all the advantages from the movie. Sequels are easy, safe money. If Universal is taking the risk of a possible flop of a movie (Whedon has had far more success with TV than movies -- his best aspect is his ability to evolve characters in interesting ways over time, not very useful in a ninety minute movie), I'm sure they want to have a guaranteed option on a couple sequels.

    7. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by seasleepy · · Score: 1

      I don't remember anything like that mentioned at the Austin screening (which was where he was last week), but I may be misremembering.
      In any case, he *did* say something along the lines of "The TV show is over. We have the movie now."

      It was fairly obvious from everything else related said that Joss has no love for Fox, and I have a feeling that even if they offered the show back at this point, he wouldn't take it, since that's kind of how their mistreatment of the show began -- they got him for a show because he was hot, and Fox wanted him to do *something*, and they (obviously) had no idea what to do with what they got. It sounds like he's had such free rein at Universal and they actually seem to appreciate what they've got (whether they see it as $$$ or genuinely like it on its own merits) that probably the idea of throwing the characters back to Fox to be badly micromanaged is painful.

    8. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Forthan+Red · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't assume success to soon. Remember Private Parts, the Howard Stern movie? It opened HUGE, and did major box office for a couple of weeks. But once all his fans had seen it (sometimes twice), it's numbers dropped faster than one of his stripper guests dropping her top. What had been hailed as mega-hit actually ended up losing money. The fact is, the average person has probably never even heard of the Firefly series. So while it may be a snap to get fans excited, it's going to have a really tough time crossing over to the mainstream audience. Besides, isn't one space western enough? :)

    9. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by nettdata · · Score: 1

      I wonder how they'd classify straight to DVD, direct sale episodes?

      I know I like it enough to spend $20 per episode delivered weekly/monthly.

      Not quite movie, not quite TV...

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    10. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Sancho · · Score: 1

      Unsure. I think $20/ep is a bit steep, though. Even for new content.

      Currently, one of the highest cost TV shows is Star Trek. MSRP is $130 for season 1, 29 episodes. That's about $4.50 per episode. Season 2 runs the same price for 26 episodes, or $5 per episode. Same for Enterprise season 1. Babylon 5 has similar costs.

      For comparison, Buffy: the Vampire Slayer's MSRP for a complete season (say, season 2) is $60 for 22 episodes, or about $2.75. Dead Like Me goes for about $4.25/ep, Penn and Teller's Bullshit goes for about $3, etc. Highest show I can find is $5/ep.

      For new content? I'd expect maybe $10, tops. $20 would be far too expensive, as that's approaching the MSRP for a full length movie complete with features, etc.

    11. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by tm2b · · Score: 1

      You can find much more expensive, such as Doctor Who episodes.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    12. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, isn't one space western enough? :)

      Battle Beyond the Stars is a ripoff of... er homage to The Seven Samurai set in space. Though I can understand your confusion, The Magnificent Seven was a er homage to The Seven Samurai set in the American West.

    13. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lewd.

      crude.

    14. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1
      So that explains why George Peppard was carrying a samurai sword. Oh, wait. My mistake. He had a pair of six shooters.

      Yes, I'm quite familiar with the origin of both "rip-offs". But your contention that Battle Beyond The Stars is based on The Seven Samurai is a bit like claiming that Space Balls is based on Kurosawa's The Hidden Fortress.

    15. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see the show picked up by HBO, Showtime, or even Sci-Fi (say, once BattleStar Galactica runs its course and the movie trilogy is done).

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    16. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know it's expensive, but I'd be willing to pay that for each individually delivered episode.

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    17. Re:Fox Drops the Ball Yet Again by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      The fact is, the average person has probably never even heard of the Firefly series.

      So they'll hear about some sci-fi movie and go see it based on the promise of hot babes and many explosions.

      No worries, if you blow it up, they will come.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  7. Re:Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    News for nerds.

    You're clearly not one.

  8. Sold out before they were even announced. by jaysedai · · Score: 4, Informative

    Several of the screenings sold out before they were even announced. Many enterprising Browncoats "hacked" the Fandango URL until they found the screenings.

  9. Re:Who cares? by Epcoatl · · Score: 1

    A movie that really hasn't even been released yet sold out. Twice. Yeah, that happens all the freakin time. [does the sarcasm wave]

  10. To the point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "By the next morning, well before the official list of cities was posted, fans on the Serenity movie site and elsewhere had diligently located half the listings through trial and error and several of the locations were already sold out."

    Ladies and Gentlemen. Now THOSE are fans.

  11. I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge... by Caspian · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...but who the hell is Joss Whedon, and what the hell is Serenity?

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  12. Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First post! In Soviet Russia, all your band camp are belong to us, you insensitive clod!
    I, for one, welcome our new goatse overlords...

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...but will it run a beowulf cluster of linux gimp applications to process the Natalie Portman in hot grit pictures?

      Yes, netcraft confirms, but only for old people in korea.

  13. Quick Comment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You guys need to get the idea out of your head that a highly devoted fanbase is the same as a large fanbase. Just because some rather limited amounts of seats sell out instantly doesn't mean the movie can't flop.

    1. Re:Quick Comment by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      You guys need to get the idea out of your head that a highly devoted fanbase is the same as a large fanbase. Just because some rather limited amounts of seats sell out instantly doesn't mean the movie can't flop.

      I think those screenings a a viral marketing ploy: seeding word-of-mouth advertising.

      This movie won't only be reviewed before it's release by a handfull of critics, but also by legions of fans!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  14. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Troy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Joss Whedon - Creator of Firefly, Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and Angel.

    Serenity - Feature length film based on Firefly, which Fox cancelled a couple of years ago.

  15. Re:This blows. by FuzzzyLogik · · Score: 1

    Wrong thread i think. but ya... i agree :-P

  16. Re:This blows. by sabernet · · Score: 1

    ummm...wrong thread, dude

  17. Re:This blows. by Alien+Venom · · Score: 1

    Wow, that's a serious bug. I totally clicked post commeont on the news headline before this. WTF.

  18. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by kalidasa · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Serenity" - a forthcoming movie based upon Joss Whedon's television series *Firefly*, which was a near-hard SF show set about 400 years in the future after mankind had migrated to another star system. The show is about the crew of a ship, Serenity, that straddle the boundaries of legality (smuggling, but nothing bad; carrying fugitives from the big bad corporate government) and are mostly loyal to their captain, Mal, who is a veteran of the losing side in a civil war against the big bad corporate government. The show depicted two classes of worlds: high-tech core worlds, and low-tech "Western"-style frontier worlds. Joss Whedon wrote Alien: Resurrection, and created Buffy the Vampire Slayer (both movie and tv show), Angel, and a few other things.

  19. Re:guaranteed to fail by oirtemed · · Score: 1

    Just because a movie sells tickets doesn't mean a thing. Look at the movies that rack in big bucks, yet suck.

  20. dammit by grungebox · · Score: 1

    For the second damn time, I found out about preview screenings off of slashdot, way after the fact. Well, now I've bookmarked the page just in case they add Houston.

    1. Re:dammit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "We have a problem, Houston: the tickets sold out the third time aswell!

      We have no backup shu^H^H^Hticket, mayday maday!"

  21. Re:guaranteed to fail by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

    Whether it sucks or not is irrelevant. He said it wasn't going to do well.

    --
    Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
  22. Wow. by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dang, this is popular!

    They should make a TV show out of it or something...

    --
    ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't think it would work as a TV show. It would probably only last a couple of seasons before it got canceled.

    2. Re:Wow. by UserGoogol · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds like it might be a bit of a niche though. What they should do to spice things up is air the show out of sequence. That'll add an air of mystery to the series which people will just eat up.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
    3. Re:Wow. by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      Your sig is hilarious.

  23. Re:This blows. by AJWM · · Score: 1

    I think you're posting to the wrong thread, but just to steer it back to this one, you can buy all the Firefly episodes ever made for less than the cost of a couple months of Tivo. And you can transfer those even quicker to your laptop (assuming it has a DVD drive, most do these days).

    I've got no love for MPAA or RIAA, and I rarely watch broadcast TV. I buy the episodes of shows I like (Stargate, Smallville, Firefly, as well as some ancient stuff that just isn't shown anymore) as they come out on DVD. This does make a difference -- I have no doubt that the sales of the Firefly DVD played a big part in making the movie Serenity possible, by proving the market.

    By the way, do you watch the commercials that come with those downloaded broadcast episodes?

    --
    -- Alastair
  24. Re:guaranteed to fail by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    I liked Titan AE...

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  25. Man, Fox really dodged a wallet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Networks are in the "Make Money" business. Fox and a number of other networks now make more off the DVD sales on a series than on the broadcast of the series."

    Guess that explains the MPAA lawsuits, even though TV is worldwide and FREE.

  26. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    google it, you dumass

  27. New FOX business plan... by mpaque · · Score: 1

    Cancel EVERY series after 13 episodes!

    Keeps production costs down, improving margin on later DVD sales!

    1. Re:New FOX business plan... by Golias · · Score: 1

      "House" is far and away the most brilliant show on TV right now, and it's on FOX.

      Therefore it's doomed, because FOX seems to drop every good show which is not a cartoon.

      Oh well, the first (and only) season DVD set will go nicely on the shelf next to the "Jeeves and Wooster" disks.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:New FOX business plan... by Belgand · · Score: 1

      Bah, "Arrested Development" is not only far more brilliant, but it also has a strong fan base, is critically acclaimed, and has won an Emmy. Fox will certainly cancel it first!

      Just saw "House" the other day though and it is indeed excellent. I have little interest in the entire medical drama genre (I think TiVo actually gives it the best tags: Medical and Mystery though I'd probably want to add in Comedy. Then again TiVo also described Sealab 2021 as: Drama, Fantasy) but a season pass went on the TiVo as soon as it was over.

  28. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Three+Headed+Man · · Score: 0

    If you don't like it leave. The editors think that it will drive people to the site, and that they'll get ad dollars (although I haven't seen a single ad since I installed AdBlock). Stop complaining and go look at porn until the next story is posted. Oh, and you made a grammer error: You didn't put a semicolon after the inappropriately capitalized "NERDS".

    --
    I'm probably at the karma cap. Mod up a funny troll instead, it lightens the mood :)
  29. Re:guaranteed to fail by Vapebait · · Score: 0

    I second the liking of Titan AE.

  30. Where are the 20 cities? by SiliconEntity · · Score: 1

    I want to know if I should be pi**ed or not about missing out. And on what site are the screenings announced? I didn't see it at the rottentomatoes site linked in the article.

    1. Re:Where are the 20 cities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:Where are the 20 cities? by mzs · · Score: 3, Informative
      From here:
      1. Atlanta, GA
      2. Austin, TX
      3. Boston, MA
      4. Chicago, IL
      5. Dallas, TX
      6. Denver, CO
      7. Hartford, CT
      8. Kansas City, MO
      9. Las Vegas, NV
      10. Miami, FL
      11. Minneapolis, MN
      12. Norfolk, VA
      13. Philadelphia, PA
      14. Phoenix, AZ
      15. Portland, OR
      16. Providence, RI
      17. Scramento, CA
      18. San Francisco, CA
      19. Seattle, WA
      20. Washington, DC
    3. Re:Where are the 20 cities? by NickV · · Score: 1

      Of all those cities... why no New York City? I mean come on, if Sacramento and Hartford get it, shouldn't the largest city in America?

    4. Re:Where are the 20 cities? by chickenbird · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it has something to do with demographics -- Universal probably figures if they can sell out theatres even in smaller towns like ours (Providence), Hartford, etc., then the movie is going to do well. Of *course* they can sell out preview screenings in L.A. and N.Y., but everyone's been there & done that. Given the extensive questionnaire one has to fill out at these screenings, I'm sure they consider the smaller towns to contain more "typical" movie-goers who are less entertainment-saturated than people in those two large cities, and therefore more indicative of the general public's behavior come opening weekend.

    5. Re:Where are the 20 cities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all those cities... why no New York City? I mean come on, if Sacramento and Hartford get it, shouldn't the largest city in America?

      Maybe they think there are they will sell more seats per capita in those cities. Growing up around Kansas City, MO I know there was a healthy number of science fiction fans in my high school. Still a minority, but large enough so you wouldn't get ostrisized for admiting you liked B5, Star Wars, or Star Trek (This was before ST:Enterprise though).

  31. ebay tickets for screenings by aapold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    are up to over $250 dollars for a pair for the DC show.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  32. Fox cancelled it because of politics by DrJimbo · · Score: 4, Funny
    In the Firefly series the big bad was a combination of a corrupt corporation and a near fascist government.

    Fox couldn't stand having themselves portrayed as the baddies.

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
    1. Re:Fox cancelled it because of politics by CarpetShark · · Score: 1
      In the Firefly series the big bad was a combination of a corrupt corporation and a near fascist government.
      Fox couldn't stand having themselves portrayed as the baddies.
      Oh, I don't know. I think I recall that there were some idiot crooks in Firefly, too ;)
  33. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Serenity is a movie based on the Firefly TV show which is this year's hipster "western but in space" based science fiction series.

  34. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by mlyle · · Score: 1

    Oh, and you made a grammer error:

    Oh, and you made a grammar-- er, I mean, speling eror.

  35. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's the ass-clown who wrote Alien Ressurection. He's frequently described as a "genius" by his fans, who clearly are crippled by mental illness.

  36. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of being so bitter and oblivious..

    Why don't you go rent/borrow/buy/steal Firefly the series, to figure out what all this buzz is about?

    Its on DVD and is being sold/rented at many places (brick and mortar as well as online)

    If you're a geek of any measure, you'd most like enjoy it. Then again you may not, but theres only one way to find out.

  37. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    *Firefly*, which was a near-hard SF show

    "near-hard SF"? It seems to me that Firefly places little emphasis on the hard science aspects of SF and rather emphasizes character interactions.

    Am I missing something?
  38. Re:guaranteed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    Whedon was, if I recall, brought in as a script doctor on Titan A.E. It's fair to assume that what you liked about the movie was Whedon's work; what you hated was the director/studio's fault. (In fact, it's usually fair to assume that, for most movies, there's a good script lurking back there somewhere, it's just that they let the director get hold of it.)

    Related obliquely, if at all: the script doctor for the new Star Wars movie was the truly great playwright Tom Stoppard, which bodes well for the quality of dialogue in the new movie. But imagine if Lucas had somehow gotten David Mamet to touch up his dialogue:

    Obi-Wan: That's enough. You stop fucking Padme or you're out of the Clone Wars, pal.
    Anakin: Fuck you.
    Obi-Wan: Fuck me? Fuck me in hell. Fuck me in hell, pal. You read the plaque on the door. You're my fucking padawan, pal. I'm your master. I've made my decision.

  39. Re:guaranteed to fail by OS24Ever · · Score: 1

    Well to waste space and all I'm going to say Me Too. It was a fun film, decent soundtrack, great popcorn movie.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  40. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Knight2K · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the obvious reasons is that Firefly was a science fiction television show, which is generally a fairly nerdy entertainment. In addition, Firefly is generally regarded as a very good science fiction show that some might mention in the same breath as Battlestar Galactica, Farscape, and Babylon 5.

    You probably could argue that TV is generally lame, and that is difficult to dispute. However, I've found Joss Whedon's work to be generally better than most of the shows out there. He deals with a lot of interesting themes in a very entertaining way without talking down to his audience.

    More than that, he takes risks with his work. He kills off beloved characters if it serves his story, regardless of the fan reaction. He did a show that was almost entirely without dialogue and an hour-long musical episode.

    These approaches could have ended up as cheap gimmicks, but usually they worked really well. I think a lot of people want to see entertainment that does try to be different. I think geeks and nerds are used to seeing value in things that other people might not understand.

    Is a sci-fi movie ultimately stuff that matters? Perhaps not compared perhaps to environmental issues, war, and politics. But life has to be about more than that. Art, music, and culture have their places as well. Wide availablity and low accessibility don't necessarily disqualify popular mediums from being art and being important in its own way.

    It sounds like you haven't really seen any of Mr. Whedon's work. I suggest you rent a few of the Buffy TV series DVD's or the Firefly collection and try it. You might find you like it, or at the very least, have a more informed dislike of it.

    --
    ======
    In X-Windows the client serves YOU!
  41. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Star Trek is relevant, if Battlestar Gallactica is relevant, and if Star Wars is relevant, then, yes, Serenity/Firefly is relevant.

    While it can be debated whether any such films/tv shows are relevant in a forum like this (it is entertainment, not tech), Firefly was a good TV series, even for its short run. I did not see it first time around (on Fox), but I did subsequently, and was impressed. Like alot of people, I found myself asking why Fox cancelled it.

    It was surprising, witty, and thought-provoking in a subversive rather than preachy way, and they even used plausible physics for much of the space-related action (geek connection). The injection of Chinese into the dialogue was also quite funny, once I looked up some of the meanings or asked Chinese-speaking friends about it (some of the swear words were especially funny -- nice job getting past the censors :-)). It made cultural sense too -- if humans moved to another solar system en masse, the language would likely turn into a kind of polyglot, with the more populous cultures figuring prominantly. It was obvious the writers put thought into the details.

    Finally, it is still an open question whether a generally "unknown"/new science fiction movie such as this will be a commercial success. Most of the financially successful SF films have been franchaises, such as Star Wars or Star Trek. As others have mentioned, getting a geek crowd out in full force could still yield a commercial failure -- we just aren't that numerous. It remains to be seen whether the movie will have general appeal, and the outcome will say alot about whether smart, decent SF films will be funded in the future, rather than the usual Hollywood drivel. So, it bears some watching.

  42. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by cgenman · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's also important to point out that Firefly, like Joss's better work, was a "serial," in that later episodes depended upon previous episodes to make any sense. Unfortunately, and dumfoundingly, Fox decided to air the series out-of-order, which led to the complaints that Firefly was "confusing" and "impossible to follow."

    In other words, Fox blew their own series because they didn't know what they were doing.

    It's also a space western, which is a pretty tough theme to like, but somehow managed to capture the essence of what worked with the episodes of Star Trek that worked. Even though pretty much none of the characters are good guys (the captain kills people who he thinks deserves it, the crew members betray eachother for money, the pilot keeps wearing Hawaiian shirts), they're somehow likable in a bad guy way... Sort of like Han before Lucas bastardized him into a saturday morning cartoon. The old-west themes of cattle rustling and smuggling just add to the charm and the outlaw atmosphere. It was a pretty good step, in other words, to reduce what will likely be a nastily complicated future involving DRM, standards compliances, interoperability problems, technological glitches, and complicated social procedures based upon years of snowballing bureaucracy to something archaically approachable focused more on characters. Not once in the entire 12 episodes was there a spot of technobabble or an episode focused upon getting the holodeck to work. It was all about the characters, which really shined through on the DVD's.

    It was good, but Fox blew their chance by thinking that it was The Simpsons. Hopefully the movie will rectify this to some degree. And if the movie does well, they can replay the TV shows. Most people haven't seen them anyway.

  43. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about Canada, eh?

    Joss, if you bring the movie here early then we will gladly give you some bacon and beer. Think about it and get back to me.

    1. Re:Canada by Jasin+Natael · · Score: 1

      It was filmed in Canada. You had your chance to see the movie before anyone else, and you missed out. Don't blame Joss.

      --
      True science means that when you re-evaluate the evidence, you re-evaluate your faith.
  44. Attraction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For someone who hasn't seen any of the episodes, what's the attraction? I don't have a TV but see quite a few movies at the theatre, what is it about this scifi series that's so appealing?

  45. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hard SF in the sense that it does not involve supar-time-travel-magic, aliens, phasers, automagical healing, or other standard sci-fi stuff.

    Even the reavers or WTF ever they are called are just mentally warped humans

  46. Re:This blows. by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I missed FireFly when it was being broadcast.

    After hearing about it, I downloaded about 9 episodes. Loved them.

    Then I heard that the DVD set was available on Amazon for 35$. Erased my downloaded copies and bought the DVDs.

    I would of never bought the DVDs without having pirated the episodes first.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  47. Re:I just never "got" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "when the bad guys uniforms looked exactly like Spaceballs"

    And the soldier uniforms were from starship troopers.

  48. Re:I just never "got" it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The point is it's a series without the perfect good guy / bad guy thing... Unlike Star Trek.

    They push a guy they don't like into a freaking turbine engine, for chrissakes.

    That alone is worth your viewing dollars.

  49. Re:This blows. by AJWM · · Score: 1

    I hear you. I'd heard enough positive buzz about Firefly (and there's Joss Whedon's reputation) to buy the DVD set blind (I'd never seen an episode). Some other shows I'd want to see a few episodes first, one way or another.

    --
    -- Alastair
  50. PvP by Namarrgon · · Score: 1

    Says it all, for me.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
    1. Re:PvP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were you gonna say? "I suck?"

  51. Re:guaranteed to fail by kidgenius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to work with one of the guys that was one of the animators on Titan AE at the Fox studios in Phoenix. He said that it was rather disappointing what was happening. Everyone at the studio knew they were being laid off and the studio was going to close after the movie was finished. As it progressed, people either were leaving or being laid off as they were no longer needed. Right at the end of the movie's development, there was nothing but a skeleton crew there. Fox just didn't care about Titan AE and didn't give it much of a chance (sounds like the series that is currently being discussed). As such, there was not much put into the movie by the people working on it. I'd imagine that played a role in the movie's success/failure.

  52. Begs the obvious question... by Namarrgon · · Score: 1
    Fox and a number of other networks now make more off the DVD sales on a series than on the broadcast of the series.

    So... who has the future *DVD* rights? Fox has what's out there, but do they have a lock on anything series-related in other mediums?

    What's to stop Joss/Universal/whoever getting Nathan & the crew back for a couple more "seasons" released direct to DVD?

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  53. Man, Fox really dodged an exploding condom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "i thought they just liked explosions and sex."

    Or maybe just explosive sex.

    1. Re:Man, Fox really dodged an exploding condom. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am unfortunately reminded of Legend of the Overfiend.

  54. just out of curiousity? by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    is Firefly based off a book? comic book? something else? or is it one of Joss Wheydon's own creation and the first medium was a tv series followed by now a movie.

    I was just curious if the movie actually develops the story or is it a side story that doesn't have to deal much with the main storyline (meaning that one can watch the series and future series w/o watching the movie).

    I'm personally a big FireFly fan and also a big anime fan, but I've been disappointed by anime movies once too often. Anime companies try to squeeze as much money out as possible from a successful anime series by creating movies and what ends up happening is a bad story that doesn't fit anywhere on the storyline. As many of you may know, anime series are usually base off of a manga series, but an anime movie usually is a storyline developed not by the original manga author.

    What I'm saying is I hope that Serenity's storyline fits with the rest of the story and isn't just some random story made up just for a movie where the series can do without.

    1. Re:just out of curiousity? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Firefly is an original creation. It's first incarnation was the television show that Fox castrated before the first season was even finished.

      The movie happens some period of time after the episode 'Objects in Space', I've been told, but I have not seen it. I belive it follows the story, too.

    2. Re:just out of curiousity? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

      I hope that Serenity's storyline fits with the rest of the story and isn't just some random story made up just for a movie where the series can do without.

      It takes place six month after "Objects in Space", and we get to learn River Tam's story.

      Also: Reavers!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    3. Re:just out of curiousity? by Cyberdramon · · Score: 1

      If you've seen the series then you'll know there's lots of unanswered questions, plot strings and the like (Since Joss planned the show out for the usual 22 episodes) and we were just getting into what the "Big Bad" was during episode 14.

      Watching the trailer, I'd say that the movie will answer quite a few questions and undoubtedly set up some new ones.

      Like any property making the jump from TV show to big screen movie, I imagine there will be some quick-paced re-introduction to our characters, brief alludes to their pasts and all that good stuff. Hopefully enough that Serenity will draw in new "Browncoats" for the fight as I myself will be taking many virgin viewers to this flick even if it's half as good as the TV show.

    4. Re:just out of curiousity? by goat_of_wisdom · · Score: 2, Informative

      I went to the first (May 5) screening and I have to say (as a big fan of the TV show) I was very impressed. They change a few things (personalities, relationships, etc.), but by and large the movie fits very well with the TV show and extends the story in a way that actually makes a lot of sense. Also, the movie kicks ass.

    5. Re:just out of curiousity? by SamSim · · Score: 1

      If you enjoy Firefly and are even remotely interested in anime, you will find a lot to like in Cowboy Bebop.

    6. Re:just out of curiousity? by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      They change things? Like what? And to what end? Are they arbitrary changes, or something that actually serves a purpose?

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    7. Re:just out of curiousity? by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      Yah, I've seen Cowboy Bebop already. Great anime. Thanks for the suggestion tho.

    8. Re:just out of curiousity? by forkazoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think most of the existing "browncoats" are virgin viewers. How else do you explain people going to Fandango and trying every possible city to get tickets before the showing was announced. If they had girlfriends.... Well, they might have had better things to do.

      Well, I got my ticket!

  55. damn! foiled again! by tloh · · Score: 1

    Ugh! I can't believe I missed a second opportunity.

    mod -1 redundant

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  56. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by sholden · · Score: 1

    But look at how slowly the reaver ship and Serenity passed each other (travelling in almost opposite directions) in the first episode (or the last episode if you are a Fox scheduling wizard).

    Travelling that slowly in space is not "hard SF", but of course it's dramatic (but that could have been achieved by having the ships travelling in almost the same direction and hence taking a long time to pass each other).

  57. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Amen!

    Joss disocvered that if you combine angsty/whiny dialogue with actors who can angrily stare at a camera lens you can pretend you have something well written, granted in this world of $300 million B-movies it probably does seem to stand above the rest, but in the end we just have another Roger Corman, applying the same equasion over and over and over-and-over...

  58. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did this get modded troll? I see this sort of comment all the time from Slashdotters, albeit a bit more eloquently than this example. However, the "this has no place on Slashdot" rant is far from uncommon, and usually gets modded insightful or informative. At least be consistent, people!!

  59. Fox choose not to air it by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes the DVD has been a hit. In numbers. But you can't say it made fox a fortune. It more than likely is just covering the costs that the show LOST during its run.

    The show lost no money to Fox. Fox choose to pay for production, and then did not air it. Or aired it at exotic times in the MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT. I'm wondering if did better or worse than the test pattern or the infomercial on the other channels. Since no one knew in advance it would be on at that time, how could anyone see it?

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  60. Re:This blows. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By the way, do you watch the commercials that come with those downloaded broadcast episodes?

    Just in case this was a serious question, downloaded television episodes never contain commercials. Never.

  61. Don't get your hopes too high : ) by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    (there are currently talks of having it be a trilogy)

    To be fair, that is a trend in Hollywood right now. They all want to have the next magic money making trilogy, so they get all the actors to sign for 3 movies. If the first one is a phenomenal sucess: they make 2 more.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Don't get your hopes too high : ) by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      A trend right now? Trilogies have been "the trend" in Hollywood for decades. Raiders of the Lost Ark? Star Wars? The Godfather? They've just gotten more shrewd about keeping options for trilogies open when launching a movie with possible trilogy potential.

      Personally, I think they should stuff the whole "trilogy" concept where Firefly is concerned .. just keep making movies, a la Star Trek, as long as they bring the money in. Who cares how many there are?

      Btw, wouldn't it be cool to have a scene where the Serenity crew meets up with The Betty for some kind of caper?

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  62. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    No no no, we don't blame you: We blame Fox.

    However, your geek badge is under review should you choose NOT to watch all the DVDs in less than a week: as per regular first-viewing habits.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  63. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by goat_of_wisdom · · Score: 1

    If I recall correctly, ol' Joss makes the same point in the commentary for that episode.

  64. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't Aaron Spelling be credited with that discovery? Kevin Smith added New Jersey and Stan Lee. The other Kevin added hicks. And Joss did it with metro-sexualized mythology.

  65. Re:I just never "got" it. by goat_of_wisdom · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Alien Resurrection was a bit on the lame side (to put it mildly). I did get a kick out the Angel episode where they made reference to Alien Resurrection's lameness, though. At least the guy can laugh at himself.

  66. Re:guaranteed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I third the liking of Titan AE.

    I was pretty young at the time, tho.

  67. Re:I just never "got" it. by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, come on - admit that you loved it whenever characters would awkwardly and unconvincingly start sputtering Chinese for no apprehensible reason...

    Mind you, if there's even a chance that Morena Baccarin and Jewel Staite might be spanking each other, you can mark another ticket sold.

  68. Re:AICN Reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not the way pricing works. Ask Wal*Mart, Target, Costco, etc etc. If they want to sell them for $40 a shot, they'll be doing it online, or in boutiques. And they don't.

    Despite the claims that the show wasn't advertised and it was hard to find. I watched 1 1/2 episodes. It was just unwatchable. Like a version of Star Trek TOS, but as a western that took itself extremely seriously. It was awful in everything it did.

    At least in the case of John Waters, even if one doesn't like his movies, it's clear they did at least bring *something* to the table and basically achive what they set out to. It's the difference between garbage and curry as acquired tastes.

    Gonzo porn routinely exceeds Firefly's benechmark for dialogue, acting, and set design.

  69. Not an accurate report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Joss Whedon reported that the tickets would probably go on sale the following day. By 10am PST some services began selling tickets and were sold out within 10-15 minutes. By noon on the same day, 15 venues had sold out and an hour or two later, the entire 20 venues were sold out. Not the following morning. Within 30 minutes of the venues going up for sale, Ebay scalpers had already posted lots of 1 to 10 tickets for sale.

  70. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by DrXym · · Score: 1

    In other words, yet another Star Trek / B5 wannabe.

  71. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Flyboy+Connor · · Score: 1
    More than that, he takes risks with his work. He kills off beloved characters if it serves his story, regardless of the fan reaction. He did a show that was almost entirely without dialogue and an hour-long musical episode.

    Don't forget the last episode of Firefly, "Objects in Space". Watch the episode twice. The first time you are interested but confused. The second time you start to notice lots of philosophical touches. Then listen to the commentary for the episode on the DVD, and understand why it is such a gripping tale.

    This is really brilliant television.

  72. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by simong_oz · · Score: 1

    It's also a space western, which is a pretty tough theme to like, ... The old-west themes of cattle rustling and smuggling just add to the charm and the outlaw atmosphere.

    I picked up the season 1 DVD recently based on recommendations (plus it was on special and I had enjoyed Buffy & Angel!). I really really liked it, the characters, humour, SFX, plots are great. But it took a few shows to get into and I have to admit that my very first impressions were that it was not as good as everyone said. The only off-putting factor for me was that whole wild-west-meets-space theme, and I just never got completely used to it and I can't say why, but I suspect it will put joe public off much more ("cowboys in space - how stupid!". Too much wild west and not enough space for my liking, but then I can see that if it was toned down there would be comparisons made to Star Wars (Mos Eisley) so it's a bit of a catch-22.

    --
    "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
  73. Berman? by zCyl · · Score: 4, Funny

    the general film audience likes character development?

    i thought they just liked explosions and sex.


    Rick Berman? Is that you? Tell us more of this great wisdom about how to pummel a science fiction franchise into the ground.

  74. Re:I just never "got" it. by KaiZas · · Score: 1

    I happend to see that ep yesterday! It's called Fredless, somewhere in the beginning of season 3. Freds mother is telling Cordy that dad loves the slimy alien movies. Except the last on. He fell asleep during that one. That comment floored me too... Wasn't written by Whedon, though. So one of his writers was making a stab at him. But Joss has been known to be his own worst critic :)

  75. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by kyojin+the+clown · · Score: 2, Insightful
    haha this is so true, i did it with both BSG and firefly, neither of which i had seen before i borrowed the DVDs off a mate. you watch the pilot, and then you watch the next one, just to see what happens, and then before you know it its 4am and you have watched half a series.

    you know you are broken when you get up early to watch more the following morning. of course, doing it this way means you are devasted when you reach the end and there's no more.

  76. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Did I, or did I not, say "NEAR-hard SF"? ? ? :-) I think this is as hard as we're going to get in a popular TV show. For comparison, take a classic hard-SF novel like *Mission of Gravity* - the story doesn't depict, but does require, FTL.

  77. This early?!?! by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think that having preview screenings in May for a film with a September release date is a bit insane? Why do it almost 5 months before it's released?

    --
    Yup...
    1. Re:This early?!?! by tankd0g · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To drive Firefly DVD sales of course. And it's working.

  78. Re:guaranteed to fail by pipingguy · · Score: 1


    Have the kooks chained themselves to the theatre doors yet?

  79. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

    "Joss Whedon wrote Alien: Resurrection"

    Way to recommend it, dude... :-p

    James

    --
    Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
  80. Re:Why is this important? This is the 3rd time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As did you. Twice.

  81. Re:I just never "got" it. by degotas · · Score: 1

    The butchering of his scripts for Alien 4 and Buffy the Vampire Slayer is what forced him into the directors chair for Btvs "the show" and Firefly. Don't expect him to write to many scripts now a days since he is a respected director now. Consequenly writing and directing Wonder Woman for 2006. On a side note, anyone notice how similar Firefly is to Cowboy Bebop?

  82. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by mpe · · Score: 1

    It's also important to point out that Firefly, like Joss's better work, was a "serial," in that later episodes depended upon previous episodes to make any sense. Unfortunately, and dumfoundingly, Fox decided to air the series out-of-order, which led to the complaints that Firefly was "confusing" and "impossible to follow."

    Are US networks actually geared up to show serials. The paradigm of "show some episodes, repeat some episodes, show some more episodes" appears to be the norm.

    In other words, Fox blew their own series because they didn't know what they were doing.

    Not exactly news.

    It's also a space western, which is a pretty tough theme to like, but somehow managed to capture the essence of what worked with the episodes of Star Trek that worked. Even though pretty much none of the characters are good guys (the captain kills people who he thinks deserves it, the crew members betray eachother for money, the pilot keeps wearing Hawaiian shirts), they're somehow likable in a bad guy way... Sort of like Han before Lucas bastardized him into a saturday morning cartoon.

    Another influence would probably "Blake's 7".

  83. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by technothrasher · · Score: 1
    But it took a few shows to get into and I have to admit that my very first impressions were that it was not as good as everyone said.

    Funny, I had the exact opposite impression. It was love at first sight for me and I thought it was even BETTER than everyone had said (if that's possible). It played to me like Star Wars if Lucas had realized his ideas were laughably rediculous and ran with it. But after watching the whole thing, it didn't quite hold up to the promise of the first few episodes. The repetitive 'big gun fight, one of the crew members is shot, but they're perfectly fine again at the start of the next episode' thing happened over and over, and started to feel really tired.

    The only off-putting factor for me was that whole wild-west-meets-space theme

    That's my favorite part, but then I'm a big fan of Sergio Leone style silliness.

  84. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by dubl-u · · Score: 1

    Are US networks actually geared up to show serials. The paradigm of "show some episodes, repeat some episodes, show some more episodes" appears to be the norm.

    True, but other options are possible. Fox has done pretty well with 24. I've only seen episodes in order, but I can't imagine it would make any sense at all if you shuffled them.

  85. Oh no, you didn't... by el_benito · · Score: 2, Funny

    The killing I can deal with... Betrayal for money I can cope with... But dude, those Hawaiian shirts just crossed the line.

    --
    http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
  86. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    you can get all the details at serenity.com.

    :)

  87. Why not this early? by BraceletWinner · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In short, they want to build "buzz". I worked as a manager in movie theaters for a number of years, and while five months early is a bit extreme, many movies had early screenings to build buzz. There have been several movies that I can remember screenings of that really helped. When "When Harry Met Sally" came out, there were some early screenings and everyone was talking about the orgasm scene. People called us weeks in advance to find out when we were playing it. It sold out every weekend for several weeks.

    If "Serenity" is good, and there's no reason to think it won't be, why not create some buzz and pay for the screenings at the same time? The distributors know that the rabid fans will pay to see this movie early, and they're hoping that they'll tell all their friends about it. If you can create a buzz going into summer, people will look forward to it even while being bomabrded with the usual summer blockbusters.

    I think this is a brilliant move on the distributor's part, and I hope they have a few more between now and September to keep the buzz going.

    1. Re:Why not this early? by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm just curious... is the movie in its final form right now? Or will it be tweaked a bit here and there prior to its official September release?

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  88. Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private Parts lost money?! You must be stoned. According to this, Private Parts cost $28 million to make. The domestic box office was $41 million, which is pretty respectable for is essentially a bio-pic. And this does not include any VHS/DVD sales and rentals.

    1. Re:Nonsense by Forthan+Red · · Score: 1

      The cost number you're looking at is the domestic pre-buget number. That's not the final cost.

  89. All sold out! by emo1313 · · Score: 1

    http://www.cantstopthesignal.com/ least i know where to look if they do another.

  90. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    Fox blew their own series because they didn't know what they were doing.

    Like someone mentioned above, it could either be superhuman incompetance, or some executive war where one was bright and produced a good show, and the other was cunning and got it on the random shifting time slot of death. In other words: Petty sabotage.

    the pilot keeps wearing Hawaiian shirts

    I wonder if he comes from a core planet of hawaiian shirt people and he got the frontiere job to show off his piloting skills in a less regulated and constricting environment than his tropical home.
    If you look at him in "out of gas", he seems the most bothered by the cold.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  91. This late by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone else think that having preview screenings in May for a film with a September release date is a bit insane? Why do it almost 5 months before it's released?

    It was supposed to be released in late march.
    But their producer's marketing department got wind of how much Lucas was putting in his promos and they decided that there was no way they could compete with his advertising, so they pushed it back.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  92. Re:This blows. by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    By the way, do you watch the commercials that come with those downloaded broadcast episodes?

    I don't watch commercials.
    Downloaded, or otherwise.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  93. WHY???? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    WHY - WHY - WHY - WHY - WHY does Slashdot insist on posting stories with absolutely no context in the summaries? I had no clue what Firefly or Serenity even was until I started reading posts. Hello, everyone hasn't been waiting in anticipation for this show or it wouldn't have been cancelled.

    How about you editors start using the story summaries to SUMMARIZE, instead of just posting obscure references like Slashdot is a personal blog? We're not your roommates.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:WHY???? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... have you been living under a rock or something?

  94. Re:guaranteed to fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The apathy of Fox certainly was a factor, but you're forgetting that Titan A.E. also was a very bad movie:
    http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/titan_ae/

    Don Bluth directed this movie, after all: he who brought us such quality cartoons as All Dogs Go To Heaven, Rock-A-Doodle, and Bartok the Magnificent.

    Not to say that Titan A.E. doesn't have its fans, but then, so does Showgirls. Titan A.E. may not have gotten the support from Fox your friend would like, but that doesn't mean the movie didn't fail on its own merits.

  95. Re:guaranteed to fail by mink · · Score: 1

    That sucks.
    IMO Tital A.E. would have made a better trilogy.
    First movie showing earth involved in the universe, building the ship and the events leading up to the attack and destruction. The movie should have ended with the few survivors escaping.
    Second film should cover the survivors surviving and the plot that ends up bringing characters together and starting the search for the Titan.
    The final film should have concentrated on the search for the ship and the aftermath.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  96. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude. http://www.imdb.com/ is your friend. Seriously.

  97. Re:This blows. by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine used NetFlix instead... very low risk that way. NetFlix is great for that kind of stuff. She ended up watching every single episode of Angle, Buffy, and FireFly after I nudged her to try them out on her NetFlix subscription. She'd only ever done movies before, never really considered TV series. She got totally hooked. She went through all seven seasons of Buffy, all five of Angel, and the half-season of FireFly in just about a year.

    --

    - Spryguy
    There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
  98. Re:I just never "got" it. by mink · · Score: 1

    "On a side note, anyone notice how similar Firefly is to Cowboy Bebop?"

    Everyone who says that seems to have a unique meaning to the word similar.

    It's like saying "ever notice how similar LA LAW and Law and Order are" IMO.

    Other then both shows being in space I'm really lost as to the similarities.

    --
    Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  99. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by zrk · · Score: 2, Funny

    The most important thing to note here is that unlike Han Solo, Mal will always shoot first.

  100. What? No Cowboy Bebop comparisons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised that nobody in this thread has compared this show to a similarly-themed (and similarly excellent) anime called Cowboy Bebop. Although the stories branch off in major ways at certain spots, when i watched the first few episodes of Firefly i couldn't help but automatically be reminded of CB. If Whedon did use Bebop as an inspiration, though (which is possible, since it came out first), it was nothing more than that -- inspiration. Firefly on its own is amazingly written and executed.

    My favorite episode is Jaynestown. But i'd have to say my favorite character is Jayne.. so no surprise there. I actually got a little teary-eyed at the end there. And that just doesn't happen to me -- ever -- let alone with something published by Fox. The last time i got all misty in any show was in a particular Scryed (s.CRY.ed) episode. And that wasn't in America.

    I need some Serenity, goddammit.

  101. Re:I'm going to be asked to turn in my geek badge. by sholden · · Score: 1

    It also has mind reading psychic powers, pushing it for "near".

    Of course firefly clearly wasn't a "popular TV show" anyway, since it got canned in the first season and Fox didn't even bother showing all the episodes they did make...

    FTL doesn't rule something out for being "hard scifi" especially if it handles the time travel that current theories tend to predict as going hand in hand with it.