Slashdot Mirror


CIA's Info Ops Team Hosts 3-Day Cyber Wargame

ScentCone writes "The CIA has booked some conference rooms and is working through a simulated 'digital Pearl Harbor' to see how government and industry handle a monster net attack from an imaginary future foe composed of anti-American and anti-globalization hackers. Having been accused of lacking imagination about potential terror attacks, they're using the exercise to better shape the government's roles in a variety of attack scenarios. The networking industry, it seems, is expected to always play a big part in detecting and thwarting such threats, as 9/11-scale economic disruption is a likely bad-guy objective."

279 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia... by CypherXero · · Score: 4, Funny

    The network attacks YOU!

  2. Digital Pearl Harbor is Nice... by neo5064 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But personally, I'm waiting for "Digital Hiroshima"

    1. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor is Nice... by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 1

      Too hot in the summer.

      A nice "Digital Banff" to summer in would be appreciated.

    2. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor is Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neh... to easy... just link the server to slashdot to accomplish that.

    3. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor is Nice... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Nice idea dude, but you have to go through "Digital Okinawa" first.

      KFG

    4. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor is Nice... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 0

      We're all waiting on Longhorn SP1...

    5. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor is Nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, although i bust say that Digital DaNang sounds nicer.

  3. Comparison in slightly bad taste... by strider44 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People compare September 11 with a lot of things, but comparing it with a crack-fest? I doubt that it's even *possible* to kill several thousand people with cracking, you could only cause extreme inconvenience.

    Besides, security can be achieved through a couple of simple steps: Don't use Windows, use OS's designed with security in mind. Use SELinux or equivalent on mission critical nodes. And secondly, educate the users and gain a culture of safety.

    1. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What? Bringing down a power grid during rush hour, changing details of patient notes on a hospital network, or sending false messages and checking the content of sent messages all have the potential to kill.

      Have you no imagination at all? ;)

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
    2. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What? Bringing down a power grid during rush hour, changing details of patient notes on a hospital network, or sending false messages and checking the content of sent messages all have the potential to kill.

      Almost all hospitals have generators, so power would not be an issue for them. Sure, the hospital might shut down the non-emeregency, non-critical care wards, they will have enough energy to protect life.

      As for traffic signals not working, that won't cause a loss of life, it will cause many people to get pissed off.

      If 9/11 was not about flying airplanes into buildings, but shutting down all electricity in the USA, maybe we would not be in Iraq or in the middle of a war.

      Still... it would piss me off a ton if I could not watch any TV, could not check email. It is like an addiction, like caffine or cigarettes. Once you get hooked, you need your daily dose. In one way, they might be doing us a favor. Maybe people would pick up a book and think about the world, not in 30 second bursts like the TV programs us to do, but in thoughtful ways.

      What the fuck am I saying. I need some cake. I am sooo fucking hungry, not like the bastards in ethiopia who fake it for attention, but really hungry for some cake with icing. Then I am going to watch the 2am edition of the news to see if anything changed from the 1am edition of the news. Then I am going to work to make enough money to pay for my cable bill, my tivo bill, my cell phone bill, my internet bill, my insurance bill... i am sure everyone gets the idea.

      Slashdot folks are smarter than most. And that scares me.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    3. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by voixderaison · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I suppose there are a variety of crack scenarios that would result in massive loss of life. Spoofing the air traffic control system in some fantastically improbably way might cause a few mid air collisions before the planes were grounded.

      Launching a single nuclear missile would shoot past the mark by rather a lot. Let's hope the control systems for those things are not connected via some backdoor to to a network in turn connected via some other back door to a network connected to the internet, eh?

      These crackfest doomsday scenarios are not preparing government for the real problems at hand, today. Consider the case reported by the New York Times last week :
      "During a two-day period they watched as the intruder tried to break into more than 100 locations on the Internet and was successful in gaining root access to more than 50. "
      It was probably a lone cracker, possibly a small group. rooting fifty boxes in a couple days. That was just a two day sample of a months long probably-one-man crackfest. Low level information theft poses a real threat to national security. Many government agencies are not even able to detect it.

      By the way, it seems to be more popular in government circles to invoke September 11, probably because in the current climate it helps get funding. At least there is that perception.
      --
      Things should be made as simple as possible, but not any simpler. -- Albert Einstein
    4. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      If I wanted imagination, I'd read Niven.

      The dorks can play their silly simulation games and still not be prepared. Face it, if you want to be a terrorist, you've got to think like one. I doubt the CIE geeks pack the gear for that gig.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    5. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by La+Camiseta · · Score: 1

      Bringing down a power grid during rush hour

      Sorry, nope, doesn't do crap. Maybe one or two more accidents but that's it. During the summertime this happens a lot here in Vegas. Everyone's AC is getting revved up to cool down the houses in time for everyone to come home/those who have come home have just turned their AC down, and then we get large brown-outs.

      Thankfully, people tend to remember what they've learned years ago. Namely that a non-working stoplight is the same as a stop-sign.

    6. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by arstchnca · · Score: 1
      I believe that strider44's post was written with the intent to dispel myths that a large scale "cyber-attack" could be nearly as destructive or deadly as the acts of September 11th, 2001 or December 7th, 1941.

      Bringing down a power grid during rush hour,

      At least where I live, traffic lights switch to backup power and default to timed red/yellow blinking.

      changing details of patient notes on a hospital network,

      Unless things changed recently, and someone who's stayed in a hospital recently, please correct me if things have, patient notes, such as prescibed medication and scheduled procedures, are still kept on one or more physical charts. While a hospital's loss of internal network connectivity would surely impair its efficiency, possibly causing an indirect cause of death, it would not rival an act of terrorism/war. Disregard my post if you were joking (I haven't overlooked the smiley at the end of your's). I hope the +5, Insightful isn't deceiving me.
      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    7. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "If 9/11 was not about flying airplanes into buildings, but shutting down all electricity in the USA, maybe we would not be in Iraq or in the middle of a war."

      Maybe if the USA went after the culprits of 9/11 you would not be in Iraq either. Otherwise I agree with your point.

    8. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Nos. · · Score: 1

      You might want to read the comment you responded to again. The poster did not suggest that cutting power to a hospital would result in lost lives. However, cutting power during rush hour would result in grid lock. Guess you wouldn't mind having a heart attack and waiting for an ambulance, since "that won't cause a loss of life".

      Now, messing with patients records definitely could. I remember an old Law & Order where a hacker (given the story, I actually would call this kid a hacker) messed up the glucose monitors at a care home and resulted in several diabetic patients reporting with very high sugar levels and thus getting overdosed with insulin. Yes, overdosing with insulin can lead to death.

      There's a lot of other similar type scenarios as well. No more early warning systems for natural disasters like tsunamis and tornados. You'll still have phone service, unless of course you only have cordless phones which for the most part won't work without power.

    9. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Maybe if the USA went after the culprits of 9/11 you would not be in Iraq either. Otherwise I agree with your point.

      Do you know how many Americans think Iraq had WMD or was involved with 9/11? With 30 second news spots, and an ever smaller attention span, Americans will believe just about anything. Just package the editorial as news, pump in some patriotism and emotion, and Americans will do anything the big boys tell us.

      Hell, god forbid if the news started spending 10 minutes on each news story. Sure, that would only be 4 or 5 news stories a night, but it would be better to know something about a topic than just associate an emotion with a 30 second news clip. "God Damn Iraqi's, they set off another bomb. That does it... time to send more troops, lets bomb them more. Those bastards. Screw the bystanders, they probably deserve it anyways, they asked for it.".

      The truth does not matter. Everything can be spinned and made into an emotional issue. Everything can be rationalized.

      Is it any wonder the government wants to cut funding for PBS and the National Endowment for the Arts. They are some of the few places left that will spend half an hour on an issue, and even then that is not enough time to capture everything needed to understand a topic. The powerful are better served with a population that does not think deeply about the world, their lives, and what life is for. Most just think about the next car they want, or how to make more money. They don't think about happiness, at least not the way Aristotle or the philosophers did.

      --

      Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    10. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by songofthephoenix · · Score: 1

      How often do you use cash to purchase anything? and are you given cash in hand from your employee. Without certain networks the world could be in a very weird place. Imagine the little things that would be affected by this:
      You pull up to the petrol station, the attendant is no longer there because they no longer recieve pay. If they do happen to be there are you going to pay in cash or do you have an electronic card? The petrol station would be pretty much void. Meaning trucks that delivery food to your shops would also be void. Which means no food. Oh and no refrigeration to store what food you have because the power plant has failed.
      Things could get really bad very quick...

    11. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Imagination is not enough, the bad guys need the actual expertise. Islamists have so far demonstrated expertise in blowing things up and slaying the hosties. What I have seen about their computer skills and their attempts to build biological, chemical and nuclear weapons left me very unimpressed.

      Net security is important - but for God sake first make secure the liquified natural gas terminals! There are proposals for building several new giant port terminals in US which would accept tanker-sized ships filled with cryogenic liquid natural gas. It is not that difficult to invade such a tanker and blow holes in the tanks to spill the content into the port.

      Unlike oil or gasoline fire, liquified gas fire cannot be extinguished - the stuff has to burn out by itself. Also, burning liquified gas spills over water surface with incredible speed. Any port where the liquified tanker was spilled would be fried crisp. Nothing virtual about this kind of Pearl Harbor.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    12. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      People compare September 11 with a lot of things, but comparing it with a crack-fest?

      I don't think they are comparing the 9/11 attacks themselves to a crack-fest, they are compairing the resulting economic disruption to something that could be done through a coordinated cracking session. I'm not wholly convinced that economic disruption of such large proportions can be coordinated through cracking though.

      Don't use Windows, use OS's designed with security in mind.

      I'd agree with this - certainly for mission-critical systems anyway. However, *all* OSes must be kept patched and up to date - a 4 year old Linux distribution is probably just as vulnerable as a 4 year old Windows release, it's only when you keep them patched up to date that Linux gets significantly more secure than Windows.

      For workstations, Windows is sometimes a necessary evil but I think in most cases you *can* ditch Windows in favor of a better OS (Linux or consider OS X if Linux won't run the software you need).

      Use SELinux or equivalent on mission critical nodes.

      SELinux is still far from perfect on current distributions - certainly under Fedora Core 3 the supplied policies are too restrictive in a number of cases (Apache can't do a lot of stuff you want it to do, etc.). Whilest you _could_ rewrite the SELinux policies, you probably need a brain the size of a planet. :)

      And secondly, educate the users and gain a culture of safety.

      This is probably _the_ most important point. No matter how much you secure the software, the users are always a weak point. For the servers this isn't a big deal coz anyone who can log into them has (hopefully) got a clue. But you don't need to compromise the servers to cause disruption - once a single workstation has been compromised (maybe the user wanted to look at the cool new screensaver someone mailed them, whcih turned out to be a trojan) then your network is unsafe - your firewall won't do you much good now.

    13. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by flyingsquid · · Score: 4, Informative
      Apparently the US managed to screw over the Russkies by doctoring some software and letting them steal it (from WWII onward, the Soviets engaged in industrial espionage on a massive scale); the software ran pipelines. From _At the Abyss_:

      "In order to disrupt the Soviet gas supply, its hard currency earnings from the West, and the internal Russian economy, the pipeline software that was to run the pumps, turbines, and valves was programmed to go haywire, after a decent interval, to reset pump speeds and valve settings to produce pressures far beyond those acceptable to pipeline joints and welds... The result was the most monumental non-nuclear explosion and fire ever seen from space. While there were no physical casualties from the pipeline explosion, there was significant damage to the Soviet economy. Its ultimate bankruptcy, not a bloody battle or nuclear exchange, is what brought the Cold War to an end. In time the Soviets came to understand that they had been stealing bogus technology, but now what were they to do? By implication, every cell of the Soviet leviathan might be infected. They had no way of knowing which equipment was sound, which was bogus. All was suspect, which was the intended endgame for the operation."

      You could wreak a lot of havoc on the American economy if you chose to. At present, I doubt many nations would be interested in that- it's just not in their interest. China, for instance, is making just way too much money off the U.S. economy to want to touch it. Even if we started exchanging shots over Taiwan I think they'd think hard before trying that. But what what about Al Qaeda?

      "All that we have mentioned has made it easy for us to provoke and bait this administration. All that we have to do is to send two mujahidin to the furthest point east to raise a piece of cloth on which is written al-Qaida, in order to make the generals race there to cause America to suffer human, economic, and political losses without their achieving for it anything of note other than some benefits for their private companies. This is in addition to our having experience in using guerrilla warfare and the war of attrition to fight tyrannical superpowers, as we, alongside the mujahidin, bled Russia for 10 years, until it went bankrupt and was forced to withdraw in defeat. All Praise is due to Allah. So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah."

      Bin Laden's ultimate goal probably isn't to kill American civilians, kill American troops, or defeat us militarily. He wants to attack our economy. That was definitely a large part of what 9/11 was about, and it's a very large part of what the ongoing insurgency is about (200 billion for this invasion by the end of 2005, with no end in sight. What's really shocking is that everybody is puzzling over the Iraqi insurgency's strategy, when bin Laden explicitly lays out his strategy). And it will be a very large part of any future attacks, which could concievably move into internet attacks. Carnage is part of it, sure. But if he can't bleed you physically, he's perfectly happy to bleed your bank account. Incidentally, I had to go to Al Jazeera to find that passage- CNN, those J-school dropouts, post a heavily edited version without even mentioning that it was edited.

    14. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      Air traffic control must surely be a prime target for conventional terrorism too. Think about it - a coordinated attack would leave hundreds of planes in the air with no one to organise them, and would cripple the country for weeks after.

    15. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Bigman · · Score: 1

      I'd be severely alarmed if critical systems or patient records were connected to the internet. It's bad enough that banks hold financial details on internet connected machines, but at least in that case there is some reason for it. But I can't see why a glucose monitor should be connected to the internet.

      Don't forget, television is not real life.

      At least, I hope not, I really hope not...

      --
      *--BigMan--- Time flies like an arrow.. but personally I prefer a nice glass of wine!
    16. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it any wonder the government wants to cut funding for PBS and the National Endowment for the Arts. They are some of the few places left that will spend half an hour on an issue, and even then that is not enough time to capture everything needed to understand a topic.

      Actually I would say john steward and crew come pretty close to explaining everything newsworthy going on every day in only 22 minutes.

    17. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by thynk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hell, god forbid if the news started spending 10 minutes on each news story. Sure, that would only be 4 or 5 news stories a night, but it would be better to know something about a topic than just associate an emotion with a 30 second news clip.
      Hell, god forbid /.ers actually start RTFA before posting, and keep posts on topic. :-)

      While you do make a good point in that we associate emotions with events, I would find a news story that lasted 10 minutes to be probably 8 or 9 minutes of filler or opinion. The media has a hard enough time keeping bias out of the news with 30 seconds a clip, how much do you imagine there will be if we ask them to fill up 10 minutes? The purpose of a news article is to inform people of what is happening in the world, not to impart some deep understanding to everyone who watches it.

      The truth does not matter. Everything can be spinned and made into an emotional issue. Everything can be rationalized.

      The truth as defined by whom? There are 3 versions of every memory and story. 1st we have your side and how you remember it happening - this is the truth to you. Next we have my side and how I remember it happening - this is the truth to me. Next we have what really happened, but since no one is see it for what it really is it may as well not even exist. Remember, nothing ever happens exactly the way you remember it.

      and even then that is not enough time to capture everything needed to understand a topic

      While some places do a really good job of presenting ideas and concepts (PBS, Nova, Etc) 0 if you want to really understand a topic, don't rely on TV at all, or for that matter /. Go out and do some real research.

      Hope you'll take what I said here as some constuctive feedback on posting and not much else :D

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    18. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by rshoger · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      dude you're already fucked

    19. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by nebs555 · · Score: 1

      There was a story in South Africa recently about this guy fiddling with traffic lights and causing accidents in order to get commission from the local garage for any 'accident' he caused. Ok, very low-tech I admit but still potentially deadly, more so given the way people drive in SA

    20. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that it's even *possible* to kill several thousand people with cracking

      Did you miss the reference in the "From the ... dept" line?

      Sure, the US military networks are probably well secured. Do you trust the Pakistani military to have proper security on their nukes? What about the Chinese, the Israelis, the North Koreans, the French?

      Hacking of that sort could indeed cause thousands of deaths. If the US wants to take the lead in developing countermeasures, I'm all for it. And I hope they'll share the results with other nuclear powers. ("National secrets" be damned. In the computer world there is no security through obscurity. The interests of peace would be better served by sharing defensive technologies than by classifying them.)

    21. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Ours · · Score: 0

      Rembember, 9/11 was the only catastrophy ever to happen in the world. At least from the US point of view. The world has seen worst things done by nature or men before and since. Heck, more people die of AIDS everyday then during 9/11. But I guess nobody cares about that.

      --
      "You superiour intellect is no match for our puny weapons" - The Simpsons
    22. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth as defined by whom? There are 3 versions of every memory and story. [Mine, yours, and the real version that nobody remembers]

      But for every set of three truths, there are an infinite number of lies. Saying that truth is relative does not alter the fact that some lies are not even relatively true. For example, I can say that you are a mutant elephant. But that isn't true. It isn't even "true for me". It's just untrue.

      Let's get back to 9/11. What was 9/11?

      There is the truth the terrorists believe in - that 9/11 was a victory for extremist Islam, killing thousands of non-Muslims, gaining massive publicity for their cause, and forcing America to take many unpopular actions that resulted in a global increase in anti-Americanism. All this is true: you will not find anyone to dispute it.

      Then there is the truth that the world believes in - that 9/11 was an unprecedented atrocity in which Saudi extremists (striking from a hidden base in Afghanistan) murdered thousands of Americans, revealing a new threat to world peace. All this is also true: only the terrorists will dispute it, and they will only dispute the words "atrocity" and "murder".

      Then there is the lie that the invasion of Iraq has anything to do with the above. This is not true - except in the sense that some people have been tricked into believing it.

    23. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by torpor · · Score: 1

      I doubt that it's even *possible* to kill several thousand people with cracking, you could only cause extreme inconvenience.

      well, thats what drills like this are designed to discover, isn't it?

      i mean, you may not have the imagination and skill to kill a lot of poeple with computing systems, but since computing systems are ubiquitous and reach through all walks of life, i think there's a fairly high chance it could happen...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    24. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Money. Secure networks cost money. Someone installs a network-capable gadget, and then decides they would like to monitor/control the device via the local network, or monitor/control the device from an off-site location. The Internet is already there, and it doesn't cost any additional money to use it. If they are concerned about security, they might have a firewall.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    25. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by SilverspurG · · Score: 1
      Let's hope the control systems for those things are not connected via some backdoor to to a network in turn connected via some other back door to a network connected to the internet, eh?
      I don't know anything about using snmp exploits in printers to get to machines which are supposedly not connected to the internet.

      *whistles innocently and walks off while checking the rear view mirror for details*
      --
      fast as fast can be. you'll never catch me.
    26. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by robertgeller · · Score: 0

      Then there is the lie that the invasion of Iraq has anything to do with the above. This is not true - except in the sense that some people have been tricked into believing it.

      Actually, for all we know, that is still a "truth" to President Bush.

    27. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Vile+Slime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Spoofing the air traffic control system in some fantastically improbably way might cause a few mid air collisions before the planes were grounded.

      "Fantastically improbable" is the key phase there.

      The ATC system, at least in the US, is comprised of some pretty old and pretty obscure equipment.

      Not only would you have to take out the terminal area radars but you would also need to get the radio systems of both the pilots and the controllers. And don't forget that commercial airliners have radar and onboard aircraft avoidance systems of their own.

      Add to that a regional result could probably only ever be achieved since it's quite easy for pilots to fly by looking out their window for problems.

      In other words, the massive nationwide outtage could only occur on the improbable day where everywhere in the US has bad weather.

      As much as people would like to think ATC is automated, when it is looked at in even a cursory fashion you quickly realize that the whole system is a lot closer to the "Airport" disaster movies (kinda scary huh?) than a perfectly choreagraphed system.

      --
      ---- Go ahead, mod me down, I'll just post it again and you lose your mod points.
    28. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most hospital networks are connected to the internet, but via a very lax firewall, also I have been told that a hospital hospital live ethernet port in a waiting room, connected to the hospital network, which carries unencrypted traffic. The sysadmins are generally overworked and out of time, they are glad to keep the stuff running. Actually this isn't the only issue, with some simple intermingling anyone can walk into a hospital and steal patient data, security is generally very lax and usually no ids.

    29. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by gowen · · Score: 1
      Spoofing the air traffic control system in some fantastically improbably way might cause a few mid air collisions before the planes were grounded.
      If your air-traffic control computers are connected to the Internet, you've pretty much brought that disaster upon yourself.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    30. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by rikkards · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, people tend to remember what they've learned years ago. Namely that a non-working stoplight is the same as a stop-sign.

      You like to think.

      It only takes one idiot on their cell phone more concerned with their trivial conversation rather than the fact that they are driving a 2 ton death machine to forget that while someone else is going as it is their turn. Almost happened with me during the big blackout couple years back.

      Damn middle aged woman chatting it up in her cadillac.

      But in general I was surprised how well things went during the blackout. It was actually enjoyable (minus the no AC).

    31. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by robertgeller · · Score: 0

      This is probably _the_ most important point. No matter how much you secure the software, the users are always a weak point. For the servers this isn't a big deal coz anyone who can log into them has (hopefully) got a clue. But you don't need to compromise the servers to cause disruption - once a single workstation has been compromised (maybe the user wanted to look at the cool new screensaver someone mailed them, whcih turned out to be a trojan) then your network is unsafe - your firewall won't do you much good now.

      Very true. Too often do people forget that it is usually not the technology that gets people in trouble; rather, it is their ignorance of technology, sheer acts of stupidity, and lack of common sense that play the major role in how badly systems are affected by a hack attempt, trojan, virus, or other widespread problem. I think what we need is better-trained, more knowledgeable computer users (especially of companies, on which we often depend for our livelihood and lifestyle) so we can minimize damage upon a serious incident like a cyberterrorist attack or a massive virus whose intentions it is to destroy infrastructures and systems.

    32. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by LegendLength · · Score: 1
      People compare September 11 with a lot of things, but comparing it with a crack-fest? I doubt that it's even *possible* to kill several thousand people with cracking, you could only cause extreme inconvenience.

      Which is all true except for the fact that the write up said nothing of the sort:
      The networking industry, it seems, is expected to always play a big part in detecting and thwarting such threats, as 9/11-scale economic disruption is a likely bad-guy objective.
    33. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by pandymen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is no software that exists and is 100% secure. True, there are OS's designed for government applications like air traffic control, power grids, and traffic grids. If someone hacks into the air traffic control system, they could easily crash several planes a la Die Hard 2. If they changed all the traffic lights in Chicago rush hour to green, more than a few people would die. And so on. The threat they are most worried about is another terrorist attack while the emergency services are preoccupied by another large-scale problem (i.e. no power, planes crashing, gridlock).

    34. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by subtropolis · · Score: 2

      google 'SCADA'. Then use your imagination. (hint: others have already, and they're plenty concerned)

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    35. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Think of Iraq as a honeypot for terrorists...

    36. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by zerbot · · Score: 1

      During a power outage a few years back, I properly stopped at the light that was out, and then went. There was a car coming down the hill to my left. The car behind me came up to the light, and then went as the car to the left hadn't quite reached the intersection yet. The car to the left didn't stop, and barreled right into the driver's side door going 40-45 miles an hour (speed limit is 35 on that street). The driver was critically injured but did pull through.

      Since that time, I've gone out to watch nearby intersections when the power goes out. On a very sunny day, probably about 2/3 of people don't stop unless they are prompted to by someone stopping in front of them, and I've witnessed several near misses as a result. Luckily in the daytime, traffic at most intersections tends to be heavy enough that there will be a steady stream of cars and there won't be anybody arriving at the intersection without someone stopped in front of them. Even at night, about 10-20% don't stop. In the daytime, people see red, they see yellow, but a blank light seems to trigger the same brain function as green, i.e., "not red, not yellow".

    37. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The purpose of a news article is to inform people of what is happening in the world, not to impart some deep understanding to everyone who watches it.

      "News is what someone wants to suppress. Everything else is advertising".

    38. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      One thing is widespread actual physical destruction and direct harm to people, another thing is "economic disruption". Perhaps I worry to much, but if a crack comes ... there are already plenty of people on the far right who blame us pessimist on the left ("globalization protesters") for everything that is wrong in the world today, and if a government decides to blame an economic downturn on our side, by means of a hacking accusation or otherwise... As I said, I'm a pessimist in these matters, and this news doesn't make me less so.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    39. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the world. If you have a clue you must hide on the Internet or get shunned by some idiot who sits and watchs TV all day because you told him he's wrong.

      The media wants people as dumb and as boxed in as possible so they can brainwash, when you get smarter then that they no longer intrest you and you become an out sider in society.

      --
      I like muppets.
    40. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      Heck, more people die of AIDS everyday then during 9/11. But I guess nobody cares about that.

      No, of course not. AIDS is for teh gheys and the poor African countries, why should we Americans give a shit about them?

      Those subhuman Muslim extremists from Iraqistan hate freedom, and America stands for freedom. The events that transpired on 9/11 serve as a reminder that those godless heathens are fueled by blind hatred, so by golly, let's just blindly hate them right back!

      Seriously though, several posts in this thread have reignited my e'er-dwindling hope for humanity. I know there are people whose eyes are open, I just don't know why they remain so immobile. It's time we accept that the system does not work, and that change must come from the outside (*note to Carnivore: I am not endorsing terrorism*).

      We need to open people's eyes-- to remind them that there are better ways to live than our current state of existence. Poverty and suffering, or ignorance and complacency is unacceptable.

      Damnit, now I'm all riled up.


      note: I know Carnivore is a (supposedly) defunct EMAIL scanner.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    41. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by DeathPickle · · Score: 1

      Nope they've changed. Last year, my father was in the ICU for 6 weeks, and my mother had heart surgery and was in the Surgical ICU for 2 weeks a few months ago. In both cases, I never saw a physical chart. The nurses would come in, pick up a bar code scanner from beside a PC (with an 802.11b card), walk over and scan a wristband on the patient, go back to the computer and look up what needed to be administered. Every time I was there when this happened, I was sure to ask what they were injecting, and why it was needed. Not so much that I was concerned of a medical mixup, but more so I knew what was going on.

    42. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by synthespian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Incidentally, I had to go to Al Jazeera to find that passage- CNN, those J-school dropouts, post a heavily edited version without even mentioning that it was edited.

      Yeah, I remember reading the original statement:
      "And it was to these sorts of notions and their like that the British diplomat and others were referring in their lectures at the Royal Institute of International Affairs. [When they pointed out that] for example, al-Qaida spent $500,000 on the event, while America, in the incident and its aftermath, lost - according to the lowest estimate - more than $500 billion.

      Meaning that every dollar of al-Qaida defeated a million dollars by the permission of Allah, besides the loss of a huge number of jobs.

      As for the size of the economic deficit, it has reached record astronomical numbers estimated to total more than a trillion dollars.

      And even more dangerous and bitter for America is that the mujahidin recently forced Bush to resort to emergency funds to continue the fight in Afghanistan and Iraq, which is evidence of the success of the bleed-until-bankruptcy plan - with Allah's permission.

      It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Halliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is ... you."here)

      Actually, at the time I was kind of shocked at the self-imposed censorship of the American media. Sometimes I think the USA has achieved a more effective way of brain-wahing than the Soviets could have ever dreamed of...No in-depth analysis in news media, no space for political discussion, people afraid to vent their political views, a presidential campagin that can only be won with loads of money, indirect elections for president, moralism, fear of "communism" (or, as the neo-macarthist term would have it today "anti-americanism"), etc. And, no, I'm, no a lefty.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    43. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if the USA went after the culprits of 9/11 you would not be in Iraq either. Otherwise I agree with your point.

      Are you forgetting that our first stop was Afghanistan, then the home of Al Qaeda (the "culprits" of 911), shortly after 911? The left and sympathizers tend to like to forget about that and believe this was all about Iraq and oil.

      While we did not find huge stockpiles of WMD we did find plenty of illegal things that Saddam claimed he didn't have (sarran gas, long range missiles, unmanned drones just to name a few). Plus, there's evidence that he moved his WMD stockpiles out of the country, possibly to one of his neighbors.

      Saddam was shooting at our jets patrolling the no fly zones over Iraq in violation of UN resolutions.

      Saddam hosted an international terrorist training camp featuring a 707 jet fuselage and mock train cars for hijack training using food utensils and other common items. Sound familiar?

      Let's not forget that the current leader of Al Qaeda (the "culprits" of 911) in Iraq, that kills innocent Americans and Iraqis on an almost daily basis, fled from Afghanistan after being wounded by American forces. Where did he flee? First to Iran for medical treatment and then to Iraq (before the latest Iraq war for Kerry and Dean fans) where he sought asylum and a place to train more terrorists. Like most terrorists that hate America, he was very welcome in Iraq.

      I haven't even come close to going through all of the reasons that taking out Saddam and his terror supporting regime was absolutely necessary. It would have been irresponsible and stupid to ignore such a threat -- especially after what had happened on 911.

      Say, those gas prices are really low these days aren't they? Good thing we fought that "oil war" to drive gas prices down and profits up for all of Bush's fat cat oil buddies. All I can say to the lefties and other ignorant liberals that buy this feces is -- wake up out of your Vietnam/quagmire/oil war wet dream.

    44. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost all hospitals have generators, so power would not be an issue for them. Sure, the hospital might shut down the non-emeregency, non-critical care wards, they will have enough energy to protect life. As for traffic signals not working, that won't cause a loss of life, it will cause many people to get pissed off.

      Did you miss the points above on purpose? He specifically stated that the power loss would affect traffic signals, which could most certainly result in loss of life with enough stupid drivers not paying attention to the road. As for the hospital issue, we already know about the backup power, but changing patient RECORDS as was stated by the parent as well, could also result in some nasty problems. Please read more carefully before insulting the slashdot readership!

    45. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by orderb13 · · Score: 1

      Nah, even he isn't that stupid. Just go do some web crawling and you'll turn up all kinds of links talking about how Bush had planned this all along. I don't remember the links at this time though, and am too lazy to go find them, but you should feel free to.

    46. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It scares me that you think a cyber attack against the infrastructure of the country such as the power grid or financial system is only an annoyance. Someone on slashdot with this mentality and we wonder why cyber security is not taken seriously.

      Total loss of power for a sustained time can cause loss of life, not to mention huge financial consequences. That 'non-critical' care you say might be inconvienienced might be someones organ transplant or chem therapy.

    47. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If 9/11 was not about flying airplanes into buildings, but shutting down all electricity in the USA, maybe we would not be in Iraq or in the middle of a war.

      The evidence is still that a bomb detonated in the quadrant of the Pentagon lost on September 11. No plane flew into it. (The third plane in Pennsylvania, unfortunately, was shot down on Dick Cheney's orders.) We would not be in Iraq waging war against the Iraqi people if George Bush had not decided this war of choice would be a good way to keep people fearful for a while longer just long enough to help his election effort.

    48. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by theconartist · · Score: 1

      you forgot about global thermonuclear war!

    49. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


      Bwahahahahahah!!!

      THAT old canard! Does even Rush Limburger trot that one out anymore?

      After 1,600 dead US troops, I'd say Iraq was a honeypot for Americans...

      The notion of sending US troops to die in a foreign country to keep terrorists from attacking US civilians is not likely to go over well - especially after the next terrorist attack on US civilians...

      Not exactly what you'd call a terribly effective tactic.

      As Patton said, "Nobody ever won a war by dying for his country. You win a war by making the other poor bastard die for his country."

      NOTHING done in Iraq has improved the so-called "War on Terror" (which was a PR stunt anyway to cover alternative motivations such as oil pipelines and heroin in Afghanistan and oil pipelines from Kirkuk to Haifa, and the like.)

      The general consensus of intelligence experts is exactly the opposite.

      --
      Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    50. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by trek00 · · Score: 1

      Do you really think that the major problem for the USA in the 9/11 was the death of many people? I don't think so, it's not logic:

      * 9/11

      http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/vict ims/main.html
      USA civilian deaths: 2'898
      USA military deaths: 125

      Total: 3'023

      * Afghanistan war

      USA military deaths: 184 http://icasualties.org/oef/
      Afghanian civilian deaths: 3'000 http://www.cursor.org/stories/civilian_deaths.htm

      Total: 3'184

      * Iraq war

      USA military deaths: 1'651 http://icasualties.org/oif/
      Coalition military deaths: 180
      Coalition contractors: 238
      Iraq old military deaths: 9'200 http://www.comw.org/pda/0310rm8exsum.html
      Iraq civilian deaths: 21'795 http://www.iraqbodycount.net/database/
      Iraq police deaths: 2'115 http://icasualties.org/oif/IraqiDeaths.aspx

      Total: 35'179

      * Conclusion

      Total USA deaths in 9/11: 3'023
      Total USA deaths in war: 1'835 (60% of 9/11)
      USA military injured: 12'384 (409% of 9/11)
      Other deaths: 30'321 (1003% of 9/11)

      Probably for the CIA and the highests USA political institutions, the main problem of the 9/11 cannot be the death of many people, but it should be searched in economic and image loss, political instability and other things, but not for the deaths, at all.

      If you keep in mind these things, the interest of the CIA and others defence agencies in massive network attacks is simply logic.

    51. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by WelcomeToTheFallout · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I doubt that it's even *possible* to kill several thousand people with cracking, you could only cause extreme inconvenience.

      What about hacking into the radar system at airports? (circa Die Hard 2). Seems to me that you could kill a few thousand people if you managed a major hack into all the airports in the US at once. How many planes are landing at this exact instant? Seems like it could be slightly more than an inconvenience.

      --
      What'chu lookin' at Willis?
    52. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by robertgeller · · Score: 0

      Planned what? That still doesn't mean that he doesn't think he invaded Iraq for a good cause, because he sure might. Besides, I didn't say he *does* think it's a truth, just that he might, for all we know.

    53. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Tesla+Tank · · Score: 1
      Slashdot folks are smarter than most.

      You must be new here. :p

    54. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by dave420 · · Score: 1

      More FUD. Windows can be used very securely. Saying to not use it flat-out reeks of zealotry :) I'm just saying...

    55. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      Hospital gear is not a cellphone, they don't try to put the kitchen sink in every item.
      I cant imagine a glucose monitor hooked up to any kind of network sorry. At best they record data internally and you can download it or otherwise manage it, but the user has to take the action.

      Sorry but Law and Order is shit for 90% of it's writing about anything, especially technology. I don't take credible threat scenarios from tv writers.

      Read up on HIPAA and look at what real world hospitans are doing to be compliant.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    56. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      Do you know anything about medical records?
      Most places still use paper or at best scan the paper in onto read only media that is triple checked before it's committed.
      The places that do do electronic medical records still have safeguards, and on top of that J. Random Hacker assuming they can get into a HIPAA complaint site will still have to know about 1. the software and how to use it. 2. have to know medically how to make a useful change. 3. know the record they are changing is an active patient.
      Just to get a scope of how hard it is, most organizations have records for patients going back years, often only a small portion of the patient records they have are active. Now the software may mark the client as active in some obvious way but that is not something you can rely on.

      Before worrying hackers or terrorists are messing with medcal records and killing millions of patriotic americans I'd worry about ten times as much about crazy angel of death types working in the hospital.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    57. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      "Total loss of power for a sustained time can cause loss of life, not to mention huge financial consequences. That 'non-critical' care you say might be inconvienienced might be someones organ transplant or chem therapy."

      Have you ever worked in a hospital.
      Trust me, the generation system is more then enough to keep the OR and other areas open and fully functional. There is no way in hell they would ever even think of letting the slightest posibility of an interuption even begin to start to possibly think of happening maybe. They even keep IT and light going.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    58. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      How much do any of you people know about how air traffic control works?
      These BS what if scenarios you all come up with reek of bad movie scripts that are neigh impossible.
      Seriously, each large airport (small town ones don't have this AFAIK) has 2 control towers, the main one and a backup. In the event terrorists take one out the other is still there. On top of that there is a regional ATC that coordinates things between different airspaces. Try learning how this stuff works and then come up with it's flaws.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    59. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      So your saying that all airports radar systems are directly connected to the net and have simple to unsterstand interfaces so they can all be taken down at once? You really belive that shit? The stupidity in all these doomsday speculations people are making here keeps getting thicker and thicker.
      Also for the love of all that is sane stop using fucking hollywood movies as sources for how things work/are in reality.
      When you people go outside is it like Arnolds character in Last Action Hero when he ends up inthe real world?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    60. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Just wait. Networked medical devices will become much more common in the future. See here for an example.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    61. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      And nowhere in that diagram do I see the internet.
      Every medical network I have looked at (and Iahve seen many hundreds), the WAN, remote sites (dialup or whatever) as well as all the internal machines are not directly plugged into the internet or on the otherside of a public connection.

      Sure someone may make it past the firewall, but again it takes knowing that you are attacking (that particular hardware) knowing the software, knowing the meaningful changes to make. You have more to worry about from a psycho doctor/nurse then terrorists ddosing the EKG's. When they do go down a warning goes off and nurses check up on the patients. Hospitals wont cut power to an in use OR because they want the generator to run longer for the ICU, they either have a backup backup generator or have someone pump in more fuel.

      All I see in this thread is horribly bad "what if" scenarios that are so far fetched as to only exist in bad tv/movie scripts.

      All I can think of is the line from The Man with one Red Shoe (Tom Hanks re-make) "What if you just shut up".

      This isnt directed at you, I'm just venting some anger at people who seem to have no working knowldge or experiance withthe systems and infrastructure they are wildly speculating about.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    62. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 1
      Read the following after assessment of the 2003 Northeast blackout:

      http://bt.naccho.org/E-newsletter-archive/NYC-Blac kout-Article.htm/

      Excerpting one section that makes my point:
      "Despite having emergency generators, four of 76 hospitals in the city were temporarily without electricity during the blackout. The longest interruption was two hours and 45 minutes. "

      If you read more you'll see there was concern about vaccine spoilage, their were many desktop computers that had been deemed non-critical yet turned out to be critical during the blackout.

      I just dont think people realize how critical power is and when it is gone lives are at stake. I would hazard to say the impact on non metropolitan areas and rural areas would be much worse than in NYC.

      The conclusion from the following NIH report http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd= Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15640685&dopt=Abstrac t/ states "The blackout dramatically increased EMS and hospital activity, with unexpected increases resulting from respiratory device failures in community-based patients. Our findings suggest that current capacity to respond to public health emergencies could be easily overwhelmed by widespread/prolonged power failure(s)."

    63. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by WelcomeToTheFallout · · Score: 1

      So your saying that all airports radar systems are directly connected to the net and have simple to unsterstand interfaces so they can all be taken down at once?

      I don't believe they're all directly connected to the net. But who says it has to be done from the outside? If planned far enough ahead, you could get people hired into the system. 15 guys (who could potentially have been working there for years and therefore know the system) across the country who happen to be working in their respective towers at the same time all say the ground is 500 feet higher than it is.

      When you people go outside is it like Arnolds character in Last Action Hero when he ends up inthe real world?

      You're talking shit when you're choice of theatrical comparison is Last Action Hero? A movie that nobody saw?

      --
      What'chu lookin' at Willis?
    64. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      I'll avoid being injured near those sites then. Every hospital I ahve worked at had functional backups and they made sure they worked.
      Only once ever did I see a power loss that the generators did not kick in (with barely a flicker of the lights) and that was because the power company managed to screw the pooch while working on the incoming power where the generator links into the system.
      While four is a small number it's unacceptable and should not happen. Also heads should have rolled over the long time it too to restore power to that one.

      I would read that article but I get "Page can not be found" (yes I made sure there was no space).
      Also I wish the medical profession would encourage people who need machines to survive on the outside to get either backup generators for the home or some form of UPS.

      My point and why I'm getting angry at the wild ass know nothing speculation about what some 1337 haxor can do is ther are safeguards, not every god damn electrical device in the world is accessable on the internet.

      Non metro and rural areas (from my direct experiance) tend to have a lower dependancy on IT and tech. From what I saw of the blackout (I live in Ohio) NYC had it worse then around here in the midwest. Often they still use paper medical records and have few computers (outside of say accounting, while important is not going to kill anyone).

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    65. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      My use of Last Action Hero was not because it was a good movie. It was becuase it takes characters who live in a world of movie physics and plotting and puts them (briefly) in the real world where things dont explode when you shoot them, getting shot will kill you, and instead of people being killed for money or some big scheem they get killed for a pair of shoes.

      All these doomsday speculations require so much more work and time then any terrorist wants to put into execution (otherwise they would cary out attacks like that). The long time for it to happen means more chances the plot is found out as well as people deciding to drop out ot alert authorities. They would be more likely to blow up the radar or control towers. Gas an airport terminal (Assuming they can get anything deadly in enough quantity) or the holy grail of fearmongers, the nuclear device.

      If I had a penny for every asshat that says (we need to be on high alert for terrorists getting a nuke) every 5 min I'd be rich. As much as I am sure terrorists would like to nuke a city, it just is not easy. Frankly you should worry about them trying to use something like avian flu to infect large population areas. Easier to accomplish but still more work then strapping explosives to yourself.

      Do you enjoy promoting fear over rational collected thought? The only way we can effectively defend ourselves (outside of nuking the rest of the world) is to keep our heads and take reasonable effective steps to prevent attacks. We screen air traffic controlers as well as many other personel for this kind of reason. You dont need to be a terrorist, just some guy sitting there who loses it and goes nuts to have the same kind of thing happen.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
    66. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by WelcomeToTheFallout · · Score: 1

      The only way we can effectively defend ourselves (outside of nuking the rest of the world) is to keep our heads and take reasonable effective steps to prevent attacks.

      I disagree that this is the only way. The best defence against a vast majority of these terrorists would be simply to stay out of their business. What entitles the U.S. to be the 'world police', forcing their ideals on the rest of the world? I think you'd find terrorists losing a lot of support if the U.S. just left the middle east alone. I would think it's hard to garnish much support for attacking someone who's not doing anything to you (I'll let you fill in the obligatory Bush joke here)

      P.S. my comment regarding Last Action Hero wasn't so much a shot at it being a good/bad movie. It was more aimed at the fact that a lot people probably haven't seen it so it wouldn't mean anything to most of us.

      --
      What'chu lookin' at Willis?
    67. Re:Comparison in slightly bad taste... by mink · · Score: 1

      Nowhere was I saying we should be the worlds police.

      I agree our foreign policy over the last fifty years is the cause of many of our problems.

      At this point "just leaving them alone" won't work IMO. However if we work with the non asshats who are not extremist nut jobs in various places and help out, we might make it so the moderates can put the hardliners in check.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  4. People don't die when networks crash by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For all the hoopla about the pervasiveness of the internet in our daily lives, when it comes down to brass tacks, it's all just electronic pulses. When those pulses go dark, the wires are still around routing telephone calls. No one dies in a burning, collapsing building. No one dies in a hijacked airplane. No one dies because they stand too close to a bomb. Those bits just go dark and the internet disappears for a while.

    A day without the internet is like a sky without vaportrails.

    Even the data that is destroyed by such an attack is not at such a disadvantage. Though the paper-less office has been a longstanding goal, it is totally a dream. Everything has a papertrail and can be backed up.

    There is no calamity awaiting us in the event of a terrorist cyberattack. The real calamity is the usurpation of rights due to terrorist attack fearmongering.

    1. Re:People don't die when networks crash by louarnkoz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, people may very well already have died in network attacks, as these attacks managed to clog telephone lines and bring down 911 response centers. Someone may well have been waiting for the ambulance that never came.

      Or, suppose that someone manages to sneak a virus inside a nuclear plant control system. Wait -- that actually already happened! Slammer worm crashed Ohio nuke plant network.

    2. Re:People don't die when networks crash by thynk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It depends on what network is crashed. Crash the network of your local 911 and see how many people die because the operator isn't able to find the address of a heart patient who can't speak well enough during the attack to give thier address.

      We've become very dependant on computers and networking. Sometimes, very critical systems are left wide open. I think that having them tested for security leaks is a good idea.

      A friend of mine who is a consultant did a 26 page report on a small town police department's network, finding that he was able to access everthing on thier network, including personal and critical information from home, with out a user account on the network.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    3. Re:People don't die when networks crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gosh, I'm shaking with fear! That network failure at the nuclear power plant caused a huge meltdown and the irradiation of millions of square miles!

      Oh, wait. Physical failsafes prevented that.

    4. Re:People don't die when networks crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything has a paper trail? Wake up! This is certainly not true.

    5. Re:People don't die when networks crash by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      Those bits just go dark and the internet disappears for a while. excuse me, but your lack of thought is ASTOUNDING your obviously one of these idiots that think the internet is the www. when someone shutdowns the power at rush hour and all the traffic ligths go out, try telling that shit to the people mangled in car wrecks. i'm sure they will agree. or better yet, if your one of them and you go to hospital, and they look on your hacked medical records and they give you something your alergic to, be sure to consol yourself of the fact "internet disappears for a while." as you slowly die. the information and services provided by computers are life and death in many many cases.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    6. Re:People don't die when networks crash by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Shut up.

      Now, the rest of you, pay attention to the shiny anti terrorism plan. Feel the soft, warm, blanket of security envelope you, as your government protects you from nonexistent threats. There.... That's it. Good citizen.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    7. Re:People don't die when networks crash by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Actually, people may very well already have died in network attacks

      Spoken like a true Y2K Chicken Little.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    8. Re:People don't die when networks crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to hand it to you, you are a true master.

    9. Re:People don't die when networks crash by timmarhy · · Score: 1

      y2k was totally over blown it's true. i bought a fucking toaster with y2k safe stickers on it. however it WAS a very real bug and many old system run cricital inferstructure.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    10. Re:People don't die when networks crash by CleverNickedName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is not lives that are at stake, it is business.

      Cold as it may be, but a country can afford to loose a few thousand people. It can't afford to loose one or two large corporations.

      For the record, I find the above fact sickening, but this does seem to fit in with the world's priorities at the moment.

      --


      Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    11. Re:People don't die when networks crash by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Actually, people may very well already have died in network attacks

      Attacks are the least of the problems with communications networks. If you want to prioritise risks, you need to work on incompetence, greed and bureaucracy before you look for black hats under the beds. ahref=http://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/mar2002/bo ul-m28_prn.shtmlhttp://www.wsws.org/articles/2002/ mar2002/boul-m28_prn.shtml>

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    12. Re:People don't die when networks crash by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      When those pulses go dark, the wires are still around routing telephone calls.

      Like it or not, the phone network is steadilly vanishing in favor or VoIP solutions. Yeah, ok - the vast majority of calls are currently going over the PSTN but I'm not sure it's going to be _that_ long before this changes (I should think that in 10 - 20 years the majority of calls will be over the Internet).

      Not to mention the fact that the PSTN _is_ connected to the Internet - your DSL connection, etc runs over the same digital network as your phone calls so there are physical connections between the two. Having physical connections between the networks does mean there is a posibility (however remote) that an attack on one could affect the other.

      Though the paper-less office has been a longstanding goal, it is totally a dream. Everything has a papertrail and can be backed up.

      This definately depends on what work you're doing. Certainly in my job, if the Internet connection dies then work (almost) completely stops for the duration of the outage.

      I can always testify to the fact that the majority of sysadmins I deal with are lazy and/or stupid - I'd estimate that about 90% of the hard drives that die in customers' servers are not backed up because the customer didn't consider any disaster scenarios or was too lazy/busy to actually sort out a backup solution. The fact that data _can_ be backed up is a moot point - when your data gets wiped out the only thing you need to consider is whether the data _is_ backed up.

    13. Re:People don't die when networks crash by DenDave · · Score: 1

      There may not be a "cracker of mass destruction" but I do note that over the last year I have seen ip's in my intrusion detection systems coming from china, indonesia, hungary, pakistan, malaysia, russia, taiwan, hong kong, india... usually just a couple thousand attempts at a time to shake up ssh or rape my mailserver but still, this shows that the digital divide is dissipating on the dark side at least.

      I have no clue as to what these countries represent in terms of actual security breaches as my systems haven't actually been breached but they are trying and there's a lot of 'em...

      --
      -if at first you don't succeed, stay the heck away from paragliding.
    14. Re:People don't die when networks crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is to smear the lies and innuendo with enough truth and confidence to confuse your prey. The anal-retentive slashbots can only chime in with their own uneducated opinions. The sucker moderators can only mod the post up for the truthful information it contains.

      By the time the dust settles, the troll has reached +5 and a swath of slashbots have taken the bait. Hook, line, and sinker.

      DS

    15. Re:People don't die when networks crash by cahiha · · Score: 1

      I have been put on hold by 911 for longer than by my bank while a gunman was waving a gun outside, or when there was a sofa on the highway at night.

      Call me cynical, but if you have to rely on 911 service, you're in trouble.

    16. Re:People don't die when networks crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Larry Bond's novel on terrorism, he uses the scenario of crashing a regional Bell system. No phone calls whatsoever over a large region. The resulting chaos was reasonable, considering nobody could call anybody for help.

    17. Re:People don't die when networks crash by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      I agree. It was a big bug. I spend days testing and a couple hours patching. My gripe was with the Chicken Littles that told the world that everything was going to shutdown. The programmers stood up, did their jobs, and the trains ran. It will be that way in the future too.

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  5. Tis already happened! by dj245 · · Score: 5, Funny
    The networking industry, it seems, is expected to always play a big part in detecting and thwarting such threats, as 9/11-scale economic disruption is a likely bad-guy objective."

    Sadly my website http://www.rogertheshrubber.net/ has already fallen victim to the hordes of the digital pearl harbour. There is a pestilence upon this land. Nothing is sacred. Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  6. Simulation Games are useless by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    All these simulation games and such designed to train/improve government IT security is BS. Everyone knows the overwhelming majority of the government budget is spent on politicians. Lawyers next, hospitality, then maybe techies.

    Now I am not saying the government has no talent. I am just saying the money that attracts top talents are with the corporations.

    1. Re:Simulation Games are useless by coop0030 · · Score: 1

      ...adding to that...How could you possibly even try and figure out which scenarios are going to happen?

      The most damaging scenarios are going to be the ones that nobody has thought of yet (some crazy idea that only a psychotic genius could think of, not some underpaid/overworked CIA agent. Even if they are able to work on some of these situations, is there really *that* much they can do?

    2. Re:Simulation Games are useless by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 4, Interesting
      "I am just saying the money that attracts top talents are with the corporations.

      To some people money doesn't matter. Time and time again the military and intelligence communities attract hugely talented individuals because of the work environment. Dave Grossman talked about this in his book On Killing. There is a small minority of people who are talented warlike mischeif makers who given the right environment, ethical and monetary backing can go a long way to louse up the enemies day. Bruce Schneier says the same thing in Secrets and Lies. Examples of this in history are myriad. Google topics like the Tunnel Rats in vietnam. The bad guy mentality in the right environment attracts these guys.

      You don't have to have to be a "bad guy" but being/thinking so is what separates the best intelligence and military personnel from the average. Obviously, you still need a 'good' value system but the 'bad guy' psyche still is needed.

      It's even written in the vast majority of intelligence literature out there that the best overall intelligence guys are borderline 'bad guys'. Examples are myriad:

      The original detective Eugène François Vidocq was the founding father of criminal investigation. He was a notorious bad guy whose innovations bolstered police intelligence gathering.

      Michael Levine who was one of the top undercover agents ever assigned to the Drug Enforcement Agency said in an interview that "The secret to my success was ..... A police lieutenant, with whom I worked many years later, looked at me, after I had done, in one day, something like four or five undercover buys from different groups -- from Hispanics, from Blacks, from Whites -- and he was covering me along with my group. He said: "You know what the thing is about you, Levine? You're a guy who should've gone bad. You should have been a gangster. You should have been in jail. But somehow you turned out right. And that's why you're so ..." [convincing]. And I thought about it, and I thought about my youth and about the way I grew up, and I realized that there was a lot of truth in what he said. I was FROM the streets. The streets were in me. There was a thin line between me and the guys who I was working against. And that line was so thin that drug dealers couldn't see it. Do you understand? The line that separated them from me as a suspected agent was so thin that drug dealers could NEVER believe that I was an agent. And that's an attitude .... that's something you can't teach."

      The CIA Case officer Gust Avrakotos who ran the covert operation arming the Mujahideen by proxy through Pakistan in the 1980's Afgan-Russian war was nicknamed 'Dr Dirty' by his CIA peers because he was such an aggressive rule-breaking intelligence operative who had an inherent 'bad guy' view of intelligence operations which helped him numerous times in executing deals inside and outside the CIA.

      Ex US Army intelligence analyst Ralph Peters Essay "The Black Art of Intelligence" speaks that the best intelligence analysts have a specific talent for the job and that talent is an underlying understanding of the dark side of humanity and this talent is born not made.

      I could go on and on. Of course, you don't have to be a bad guy or empathise to be good at the job. In fact having an organisation filled with these guys would be counter-productive. But, like I stated, what separates the good from the brilliant is this 'bad guy' mentality.

      "The best soldiers have a seasoning of devilry." General A.P. Wavell

    3. Re:Simulation Games are useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How could you possibly even try and figure out which scenarios are going to happen?

      They don't. These tests are about testing the efficiency of the beaurocracy.

      They want to know things like, the time from the start of the attack to the time it's discovered. How long it takes to reach a specific level of leadership. How long it takes to get the techies involved and a plan formulated to stop the specific attack.

      They can't know in advance what form it will take, but they want to make sure the response protocols are working.

    4. Re:Simulation Games are useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how the hell do these people get through the security screening process? I am practically a monk and pass by jobs with security clearance requirements because I had some overdue tax returns...

    5. Re:Simulation Games are useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post, dude.

    6. Re:Simulation Games are useless by CHESTER+COPPERPOT · · Score: 1
      Then how the hell do these people get through the security screening process?

      That's a damn good question. These types of people are a minority so the signal to noise ratio could get them in. Could be a number of reasons though. The security vetters could look past their idiosyncrasies. They could be good people underneath, just a little mischievous.

      One of the big things with the vetting process is whether or not you are honest up front in your dealings even if you have problems. Sometimes they'll let little things past if you are honest about it. I think this comes from the whole recruitable weaknesses idea. If you have recruitable weaknesses (a penchant for sex, money problems, fervent ideology) and you tell the vetters about it they may be able to apply damage control, however if you didn't tell them it could be used against you by foreign intelligence collectors. Then again, I don't know that much about the vetting internal process. I'm sure there are good reasons as to why these people get past.

    7. Re:Simulation Games are useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The supposed logic of the money things has always really bugged me. I have been in debt my whole life and have a horrible credit rating (I am sure but have never bothered to check it). Someone could offer me money, I'd never take it - but sure seems like someone with a great credit rating and a mortgage, etc would be much easier to temp and easier to push off balance. Me, I know how to live without money, credit, etc - people coddled with great credit ratings, credit cards, etc would be scared by the thought of going without.

      As far as I can tell, I am unrecruitable. Can you work for an unamed govt agency if you think the current crop at the top are idiots and crooks and that certain individuals orcestrated the JFK assassination?

    8. Re:Simulation Games are useless by wojci2 · · Score: 1

      What they need is Colonel Flagg.

      "Nobody can get the truth out of me because even I don't know what it is. I keep myself in a constant state of utter confusion."

      --


      /wojci
    9. Re:Simulation Games are useless by mwlewis · · Score: 1

      So we shouldn't even attempt to plan or defend? This makes no sense. If we don't think about any scenarios, then all the scenarios are the one that nobody has thought of yet. I think everyone knows that it's impossible to prepare for everything (in any aspect of life, not just this one), but that doesn't mean you shouldn't try.

      Besides, what makes you think the CIA doesn't have some psychotic geniuses on the payroll?

      --
      JOIN US FOR PONG!
    10. Re:Simulation Games are useless by synthespian · · Score: 1

      There was an Article in the Atlantic Monthly, I believe, that interviewed an ex-CIA head honcho and he said one of the problems with Afghanistan ops was that the Agency couldn't find people "to eat shitty food for years, not get laid." Agents were all middle class folks from Suburbia, in Virginia. IIRC, it was in that same article that Peter Bergen mentions that it was easier to infiltrate Palestinian organizations, because they were more prone to enjoy a night with prostitutes then wahabists (but I might be misquoting here - the Atlantic article used to be free access, IIRC). Meaning, it was easier to get along and become friends. :-)

      http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/prem/200410/bergen

      There's been a rise in black ops, and human rights violation as we see from the media. But as everything from the Bush administration, it's all muscle and no brain: mainly torture. I guess the days were agents knew each other face-to-face are over. It's a whole different ball game infiltrating an Arab organization than infiltrating the Soviet KGB...
      We can assume that, for instance, in Iraq, there's no intelligence, no infiltration, because the number of insurgent incidents keep rising.

      A fascinating post yours was.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    11. Re:Simulation Games are useless by synthespian · · Score: 1

      My guess is, unless you have a special background or special talents, and are strategically convenient (like Bin Laden once was when he worked for the CIA), this security clearance thing is for the chubbies in Virginia. Mom and pop kinda agents.
      Ever been to a third world country? Can you imagine an overweight, undertanned, clean-cut, crew-cut, blond agent sweating like hell trying to infiltrate a terrorist cell?

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    12. Re:Simulation Games are useless by synthespian · · Score: 1

      I think they're useless because they're not thinking outside the box. When those planes crashed in the Twin Towers, that was thinking outside the box.
      Now, to imagine jihadists conducting a cyberwar is something that might look good when you're trying to act as if your job mattered...
      All this nuisance in Airports and civil rights tightening, was that thinking outside the box? Just last week we saw this guy fly over Washington with a small airplane. Response time was bad. Did it help to have all those measures? What about threats from the inside, like Timothy McVeigh-type of characters?
      Anyways, whatever...Americans feel safe with Bush. It's not about facts, it's about feeling safe.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  7. CIA security.... by iibagod · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's wonderful that the CIA has such trustworthy people that wouldn't think of disclosing details of such a secure operation..... Oh, wait.

    1. Re:CIA security.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious if this has anything to do with the abovenet issues going on around Chicago?

    2. Re:CIA security.... by microbox · · Score: 1

      anti-American and anti-globalization hackers

      So according to the CIA, they are related... speaks volumes

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  8. Digital Pearl Harbor? by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "You hear less and less about the digital Pearl Harbor," said Dennis McGrath, who has helped run three similar exercises for the Institute for Security Technology Studies at Dartmouth College. "What people call cyberterrorism, it's just not at the top of the list."

    We finally get rid of one useless buzzword and this idiot wants to bring it back.

    The funniest thing about this is that from the sounds of it the whole thing is being run by CIA goons. I'm no "info-warrior" but seems kind of pointless to run a war-game with people whose tricks you already know. Wouldn't it be far more realistic if they setup a network and put out the word to John Q. Hacker that is open season.

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

    1. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      john q hacker's not going to waste his precious exploits and time on a network that has no data or processes he'd like to compromise.

    2. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor? by patio11 · · Score: 1
      I've heard a lot of people who say what we really need is something like:
      Make a test network, put a file worth of fictional critical data on it. Give out one hint on the Internet about how to find it and tell people its no holds barred. First to disclose the data to an email address you set up gets $100,000, no questions asked.
      The problems with this approach are a) you're not really sure you're going to get any useful information ("Well, we got rooted, really fast. So that was interesting, and now we're out $100k. Uh, thats about all I've got to report, boss."), it costs a lot more money than a consultant and you're sure the consultant will at least produce 100 pages to justify his existence, and importantly it doesn't tell you anything about real life. Not that the consultant necessarily does, of course, but you can't make a crackable fascimile of any real life system which you're worried about cracking because there is no simulation which has the right bugs, exploits, and social engineering approaches except the real thing and you can't possibly let people try to break the real thing. I mean, sure, you could make a I-can't-believe-its-not-a-nuclear-power-plant simulation on a Linux box and put it on the Internet, but does its software have the buffer overrun in the log analyzer the real plant does? Is the Linux box guarded by one guy at night who goes off at 12:30 to have a drink at the local bar and thinks no one knows? Is the world's resident expert on your Linux box now a consultant who mouths off about its security features to his clients without even stopping to consider whether they're more interested in the box than the project they're theoretically paying him for? These are the kind of threats you'd "realistically" see against a critical institution -- inside jobs, social engineering, stupid software bugs, the works -- and they're all but impossible to test for in a "realistic" manner.
    3. Re:Digital Pearl Harbor? by iibagod · · Score: 1

      Two scenarios: A) After being bombarded with legions of script-kiddies, the CIA concludes that there is nobody capable of breaching their security....USA wins! B) Since they secured their network to block most primitive attacks, they catch the few idiots who try their mad skillz against the big bad CIA...and are then shipped off to $BIG_BAD_CIA_PRISON and are never seen again. However, the few persons with skills enough to actually crack their network are just smart enough to avoid advertising the fact to the CIA....causing the CIA to conclude there is nobody capable of breaching their security....USA wins! Or Super Sekrit Option C: The CIA server is totally hacked by some ubergeek living in a hole somewhere. Unwilling to lose face, they black out all logs pertaining to this attack and deny it ever happened, claiming there is nobody capable of breaching their security.....USA wins!

  9. "Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Raindance · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure whether this is completely appropriate to include in a press release.

    Insofar as the intelligence community is coming up with possible scenarios, yes, I think this is a possible scenario. And worth looking into.

    Insofar as the government- MY government- is identifying and singling-out anti-globalization folks as "The Enemy" and "anti-American," I'm a bit frustrated. I'm an American who is also somewhat anti-globalization*.

    So, thumbs up for doing some preparation that might actually matter. Thumbs down, however, for singling out anti-globalization as "The Enemy" and "anti-American."

    You're the government. You have a responsibility to your citizens to not insult moderate views commonly held by U.S. citizens, however accidentally you do so. If you're going to put out press releases, hire some rhetoric Ph.Ds or something.

    *There a lot of ins-and-outs to globalization. I'm against greedy globalization, which so far has unfortunately been rampant.

    1. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by downsize · · Score: 1

      ha, no shit. so the CIA wants to spend some money relaxing and playing some video games, you don't have to hype it all up and spin it to make 90% of the nation think you are wasting our tax dollars wisely.
      and I have to agree with you on not being the enemy. most of the globalization gets me hot under the tie as well... rampant is a fitting way to describe the gg. although I must admit, I tend to stay away from political matters, even though I vote and do my part, you just never win and infuriates.

      --
      do you have shinyfeet?
    2. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Xoro · · Score: 1

      You are misreading it.

      The writeup just lists two groups that might be motivated to make such an attack. It does not say that anti-globalizers were anti-American. In fact, if they were making that assumption, the sentence you cite would be redundant.

      And yes, I know *you* aren't planning to attack anything. Neither are the vast majority of people who have strong feelings against the United States. But the possibility that someone in either group might interested in doing it is not beyond the pale.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    3. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Xoro · · Score: 1

      Okay, forget I said that.

      You could read it either way. Looks like they just chose the red team for maximum drama.

      --
      Kill, Tux, kill!
    4. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by minus_273 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      you have to agree that anti-globalization people are hardly pro-american.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    5. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      singling-out anti-globalization folks as "The Enemy" and "anti-American,"

      I agree. I'd even go one step further and disagree with their use of "anti-American" itself. I mean, it seems that these days all you need to be "anti-American" is to disagree with some of the current US government's policies, the right to which would seem to be a fundamental tenet of democracy. If that's the case then Amnesty International is an "anti-American organization" for protesting about the US government's use of Guantanamo Bay. I live in the UK, and I've never heard anyone utter the words "anti-British"...

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    6. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Lifewish · · Score: 0

      Seconded. There is nothing scarier than jingoism to a political end. Well, maybe an enraged mother bear, but still...

      --
      For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    7. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by 1u3hr · · Score: 2

      I think the emphasis should have been on "an imaginary future foe composed of anti-American and anti-globalization hackers." There are loonies all over the ideological spectrum. But as far as I can tell, the "anti-globalisation" groups don't indulge in terrorism; they just want to be heard. When the police forces herd them away and beat them down (literally, in many cases) some may respond likewise, but mostly it's street theatre. But as for a calculated act of terrorism; what evidence is there to suggest this is at all likely? If anyone wants to cite 9/11 as an example of an unanticipated act, well similar groups have been making terrorist attacks in the Middle East (for a century) in Europe (eg, Munich, 1972) and elsewhere for decades, just not in the US. Anyway, wasn't something like this done a year or so ago, when the bogeyman was North Korean elite ninja hackers? Just call them Red team and concentrate on tactics, not preemptive smearing.

    8. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by kfg · · Score: 0

      Dude, if you're not with us you're against us. It's, like, in The Bible and everything.

      KFG

    9. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid comment.

      It wasn't bandied around saying 'if you don't agree with us, you are anti-british and therefore a nazi'.

      The comment is saying that the USA's obsession with patriotism is getting in the way of rational thinking.

    10. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by DJCF · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hate to nitpick (and not to miss the humour in your post) but Hitler's Nazi party were quite pro-British -- they saw Britain as a valued trading partner for when the war was over. It was us who were anti-them.

    11. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to nitpick (and not to miss the humour in your post) but Hitler's Nazi party were quite pro-British -- they saw Britain as a valued trading partner for when the war was over. It was us who were anti-them.

      Valued trading partners? Possibly. Once the British entered the war against Germany they'd have been considered as "valued trading partners" much in the same sense that we had "valued trading partners" chopping cotton down South prior to the Civil War.

    12. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by _iris · · Score: 1

      I can understand millionaire senators trumpeting globalization as much more than it is -- the interests of millionaires lie with the global corporations more often than with the common man -- but why in the world does the CIA see anti-globalization hackers has the enemy?

      Btw, how are they simulating an attack on "The Internet" when they are all in the same state?

    13. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by synthespian · · Score: 1

      the "anti-globalisation" groups don't indulge in terrorism

      Yeah, if you've ever met one of these groups, you know they are all talk and no action. They're sort of like a quasi-hippie species.
      Which brings me to a sort of relfection on two gatherings: one was Rio92 (were an Agenda for the environment was set - Clinton era - Kyoto protocol, etc). It was funny to see these CIA guys using suits and these huge, conspicuous cell phones no-one had at the time. The other one was the World Social Forum (supposedly, the world is divided between the Good, that gathered on the WSF, and the Evil, who gathered in Davos, in the World Economic Forum), were I was with a local Debian group setting up the computers (you know, helping folks out in avoiding Microsoft), and there was a bunch of these pot-smoking "revolutionaries", highly inarticulate, doing all sorts of weird stuff, like chanting to the moon (I kid you not), or "revolutionary activism" like this group from South Africa that was all about making clandestine energy and water home installation "for the people."
      I mean, fighting greedy corporations and dirty politics is one thing, something every economically-conscious human being ought to do, but tripping all the time about "the revolution that's gonna come" is another whole different story.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    14. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 1

      You seem to have misinterpreted it.
      First off, I don't think it implies that "anti-globalization" groups are inherently "anti-American". The fact that the two terms are joined with an "and" makes it clear that they are two separate concepts, both of which are being examined here.

      Secondly, those are the groups these attacks are likely to come from. If you're a logging company, your security scenarios would largely focus on attacks by eco-terrorists. Not because ecologists or environmentalists are necessarily bad guys, but because those extremists are the ones likely to target you.

      If you're a large corporation or the US government, your IT is likely to be targeted by anti-American groups and anti-globalization groups. That's statistical evaluation based on profiling. It's not an evaluation of the moral standing of those groups, it's just a tactical decision.

    15. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was really "pro-British" of them bombing London flat for you guys during the Battle of Britain though! Perhaps they would've valued the British more if they conquered your country rather than being a 'partner'?

    16. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by synthespian · · Score: 1

      all you need to be "anti-American" is to disagree with some of the current US government's policies

      They can't say "communist" nowadays, so they use "anti-American."
      This is just a perfect system: patriotism bottle-fed from the craddle to the grave, propaganda disguised in the form of entertainment (movies, video-games, overly simplistic news "analysis"), a huge middle class population who just couldn't care less about the state of the world, smug in consumerism, with very low news readerhip, geographical isolation, and cultural isolation, civil rights violation and government-sanctioned torture of war prisioners.
      You boil it up all together with a grain of evangelical proselitism and you get Bush's America.
      How far can they move away from the spirit of the "Founding Fathers" and from the spirit of a constitution that is widely recognized as possibly the most beautiful one ever written?

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    17. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by WillerZ · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did know that. I've even heard that Hitler planned to make Oxford the capital of Europe.

      Come the finish, of course, I'm pretty sure the anti-ness worked both ways.

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
    18. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by dave420 · · Score: 1
      But if the attackers are in fact responding to some act perpetrated by the US, does that make them "anti-American" or simply "pro-themselves"? I think the term "anti-American" is used as it paints those they apply it to as foaming-at-the-mouth crazies, who would rather eat an Americna baby than listen to reason. If you catch my drift.

      Most countries simply refer to people attacking them as "the enemy" or more recently "terrorists" - they don't need to add even more emotive language into the mix. :)

    19. Re:"Anti-American and anti-globalization hackers" by The+Original+Yama · · Score: 1

      That is true. Hitler didn't declare war on Britain and France; they declared war on him. It had always been Hitler's intention to conquer Eastern Europe, hence his aggressive moves towards Czechoslovakia and Poland at the beginning.

  10. Government computer security? by IO+ERROR · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I don't ever remember government computer systems ever being regarded as being anywhere near secure. Whether it's Microsoft Windows, unpatched Unix boxes, or incompetent sysadmins, government and military boxes have historically been regarded as some of the least secure on the Internet.

    Has any progress been made in the last few years on improving the state of government computer security?

    --
    How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    1. Re:Government computer security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Has any progress been made in the last few years on improving the state of government computer security?

      The short answer is: no.

      I have some experience with this. I can't get into any details, but if I could, the stories might curl your toes. I can say that there are people working hard to keep up, but that they are stymied by resistance to improvements, particularly in the area of doctrine, rules, regulations, approvals, waivers, and so on, and by the sheer volume of systems. Change is slow and hard for the military, and it is damn frustrating.

      On a related note, the Air Force is heavily involved in informations systems warfare.

      I hope my anon posting takes.

    2. Re:Government computer security? by TrappedByMyself · · Score: 2

      I hope my anon posting takes.

      I'm kinda worried that someone working on information systems warfare thinks they can make an anonymous post to a popular website ;)

      Change is hard in the military because of what is at stake. If something works, people really don't want to change because it may cost lives if not done properly. There is not alot of room for experimentation.

      --

      Help me take back Slashdot. When did 'News for Nerds' become 'FUD and Conspiracy Theories for Extremist Nutjobs'?
    3. Re:Government computer security? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting anon for obvious reasons...

      Perhaps what you mean is AMERICAN gov't/mil boxes/networks are insecure. Ours are very well patched, I can assure you. Some systems still use old software (NT4 and what not) but everything is patched. The only weakness I could point out easily is somewhat too-acessible MS access DBs, otherwise everything's very well secured (everything's patched/ firewalled if req'd/ minimum services running/ ...). But that must depend on which country you live in and what department of the government...

    4. Re:Government computer security? by NickFortune · · Score: 1
      "Contraiwise, said Tweedledum..."

      Military conservativism can also costs lives, usually at the start of a new war.

      The example that springs to mind is that of regiments being mowed down on both sides at the start of WWI because neither side properly appreciated how devastating a machine gun nest could be against a regiment of riflemen marching line abreast.

      It's largely unavoidable (IHM). Military regiments tend to stress tradition. It's useful to help create a necessary sense of group identity and and to maintain what in other contexts we might call the regiment's "corporate culture".

      Of course, once a unit understands the need for change, things happen very fast. The question becomes how do you establish a threat as credible without spending lives to make the point?

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
  11. sounds like fun by cryptoz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hey, if you were on the committee deciding how to spend the new money you got on the defence budget, wouldn't you want to spend it on some fun war-style games? That way, you can pretend there's a disaster and save the world without the whole mess of killing lots of Americans. Much more fun. I bet you that more money is spent on the lunches of the people involved in this than money spent on ACTUAL foriegn aid (not money called foreign aid sent to the pockets of other politicians, real foreign aid). And I'm not joking.

    1. Re:sounds like fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this organization called A.C.T.U.A.L. ? I have never heard of it and work with some of the best in the business. Hmm???

  12. Digital Pearl Harbor? by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why not just call the event "Perl Harbor," I think everyone would get the reference.

    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  13. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  14. stop drop 'n roll ! by majest!k · · Score: 1

    this reminds me of those fire drill videos we had back in 4th grade... there was some announcer from the 50's who would say "Remember kids, in a fire, stop drop and roll!"

    i laughed when i thought how funny it would be if someone actually started rolling on the ground when a fire broke out..

    now i'm laughing again thinking about this simulation.. cia: please stop wasting taxpayer money. do some real work. thanks.

    --
    smattawichu
    1. Re:stop drop 'n roll ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, kids, duck and cover.

  15. You totally missed the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps you had an old fire drill announcement tape or something.

    "Remember kids, if you are on fire, stop, drop, and roll."

    No need to do that if you aren't burning.

    1. Re:You totally missed the point by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      More likely he misheard, and yet he's somehow managed to escape being burned to death....

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:You totally missed the point by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1

      don't bother flaming me for the apostrophe, thanks.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  16. didn't say anything about death by mtrisk · · Score: 1

    "...as 9/11-scale economic disruption is a likely bad-guy objective."

    Well, say someone broke into stock market computers, or bank computers, or servers of some other major financial institution...I'd say the potential for disruption is even greater than what happened on 9/11.

    --

    Without a proper flamewar, Anonymous was undecided on what shell to run.
    1. Re:didn't say anything about death by JustAnotherBob · · Score: 1

      Exactly, imagine if they had already infiltrated our stock exchange computer networks and had in place code that would create a minute discrepencancy in the prices of stocks while they(Al Qaeda) would to take advantage and buy at a lower price before the system updated or sell short before the price fell. Our efforts in curbing funding to these terrorists organizations had been always limited to hard money. By this method they could literally raise billions without being noticed for years. Charitys where what we were pursuing after 9/11 I'd think by now they'd realize that funneling those funds by that means are no longer as efficent, and must be seeking other ways of creative funding. The endgame is if we are able to cut off their sources of funding(like how Iraq was attempting to cut off our supply lines during the war). The war is not over, the battle has just begun, we must remain vigilant in our efforts to curb the explotitation of our economic system. 9/11 in the minds of too many Americans is in the distant past, but to those that still remember it as vividly as it was yesterday, have a duty to remind every other citizen that we must never let our gaurd down in that maner again.
      Semper Fi.

  17. Re:What's the BFD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tam Clancy has made a lot of good estimates what happens in the near future. I guess "enemies of USA" read more Clancy than the defenders.

  18. That's pretty limited. by millennial · · Score: 1

    anti-American and anti-globalization hackers
    You fools. You fail to realize the potential of thousands of script kiddies who just got out of school for the summer and are really bored. Prepare to be WinNuked into submission!

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  19. suggestion by Sase · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just confront Slashdot users... and make it open game for Slashdotters..

    'Hey slashdot.. here's our network.. do your worst'

    Or is that.. too much of a security risk to allow people open knowledge to try and exploit systems that normally, their presence would be unknown?

    Maybe they should follow the 'don't write down passwords' routine M$ has suggested...

    --
    ------------
    Sase
    "It's the opposite of that."
  20. Worse! by Dancin_Santa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What if someone was selling off your country's debt to its largest rival (ideologically, politically, economically, and militarily) to such an extent that they were able to blackmail your government with the threat of bankruptcy and thereby force your government to bow to their demands?

    1. Re:Worse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps intent was irony, but I should say but in a way as to not reveal the ironic aspect that the implied nation is as much compatriot of goals as the current administration and the puppet who must make his father very sad often as it may be in some sense the supposed enemy. Rather than enemy even, and on this point countering your ironic implication, that nation is actually taking a more efficient method to paramount status globally by economics and with military that make all others and former nations of paramount seem foolish not to have done the same when they had the opportunity for the much greater influence than currently possible for them.

  21. Help from private technology firms by CUGWMUI · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From TFA:

    It also questioned whether the U.S. government would be able to detect the early stages of such an attack without significant help from private technology companies.
    This is a very important statement. The US govt may have their eye on all the networks, but given the nature of the Internet, as well as the PSTN to some extent, they just cant do it themselves. It has to be strong collaboration with private firms, whose technology may well be better than theirs, as well as all the big service providers.
    1. Re:Help from private technology firms by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1

      P'raps the bad guys have already had a trial run. Notice that the witty worm didn't make big headlines at the time, but it attacked a particular sensitive part of internet infrastructure. Analysis was done by a consortium of private firms, .edu & .gov entities. It seems the perpetrator(s) deliberately aimed and charged the first shot.

  22. Bad Guys? by larsl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Defending yourself against the United States makes you a "bad guy?"

    1. Re:Bad Guys? by Etcetera · · Score: 4, Funny


      Defending yourself against the United States makes you a "bad guy?"

      From the perspective of a citizen of the United States, yes.

    2. Re:Bad Guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even a citizen. From a useless citizen, yes it seems to. However, for a citizen with function-one who both works and is aware of global events and trends, history and results of various policies, and of the general state of their own nation and of others in the immediate vicinity and on transit routes of materials necessary for production-including training of workers and worker supply, as well as population trends is not one who says that all who defend against a lumbering giant are enemies of all of its citizens.

    3. Re:Bad Guys? by larsl · · Score: 0

      Who are the good guys?

    4. Re:Bad Guys? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      You mean from the perspective of Americans? That would be your poop-throwing primate up in Washington :P

    5. Re:Bad Guys? by synthespian · · Score: 1

      From the perspective of a citizen of the United States, yes.

      This is nonsense! It's the job of every government to defend itself against any other governments. To say otherwise is to proclaim the Bush fallacy of "you're either with us or against us."
      And it turns out, because of propositions such as the above, the Bush government is one major PR disaster and every government that associates itself too closely with him get lambasted in election days (Spain, UK, Italy, ...)

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    6. Re:Bad Guys? by Etcetera · · Score: 1


      And it turns out, because of propositions such as the above, the Bush government is one major PR disaster and every government that associates itself too closely with him get lambasted in election days (Spain, UK, Italy, ...)

      Nice how you fail to mention Australia in your list, the most obvious counter-example. Georgia seems to not consider Bush's administration a "PR disaster" either.

      Also, if I recall, Blair *won* in the UK (admittedly not by much, but that certainly wasn't the result the anti-US crowd wanted). And Spain? Come on...If anything it shows how easily Spain's elections (and electorate) can be swayed by terrorist attacks.

      And hey, at least they're having elections in Iraq and Afghanistan now...

    7. Re:Bad Guys? by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Australia and Georgia don't count.
      Blair's party lost 100 seats in the parlament because of the war.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    8. Re:Bad Guys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spain's former government alone supported Bush's plans. Never its general citizens, not for a moment, and it is the disparity that was corrected by the election-it is a sign that it as a former recent dictatorship has a greater understanding of democracy than the old guard democratic-republican nations (excluding France and Germany of course). Having elections is irrelevant. It is exactly for that purpose that they are often monitored. They had them before, it is simply that formerly all votes could be manipulated for necessary purpose-now only a margin preventing assembly majority may be manipulated without stirring the concerns about Democracy for the Iraqis.

    9. Re:Bad Guys? by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      But the most horrifying thing about this reality is that more often than not it's American Citizens defending themselves from the United States.

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
  23. We fear what we don't understand by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The less one knows about computers and networks, the more one can believe any "digital Pearl Harbour" scenarios.

    E.g., I still fondly remember when I was 18, and mind you I was programming assembly for some years already, I thought I could write _the_ virus that would bring the whole economy to its knees. (Which is why I didn't actually release it.) Looking back in retrospect, omg, that idea was soo retarded.

    Now throw in politicians, who have about as much clue of computers as your cat has _and_ make a living by blowing things out of proportion to an audience who knows even less. Right. You can see where that is going.

    In practice, our computers aren't that vulnerable, ironically, because we know they're a fragile contraption. They don't exist in a vaccuum, as some box in a corner that noone knows about. Any company has a small army of admins who can deal with threats, has backups, etc.

    Even things like Blaster didn't really do that much harm. The network congestion died pretty quickly, as everyone scrambled to block ports and disinfect machines. At the corporation I work for, it cost a total of a couple of days of the IT staff's work, to deal with some tens of infected computers out of many thousands. And that was the only virus I know of that made it inside in the last half a decade. (Unlike what Linux zealots like to claim about Windows securitiy, IRL it doesn't really cost _that_ much to keep it running.)

    Or I remember one bank bitching about their DB/2 corruption, but even that didn't shut them down. Even doing the irresponsible thing and keeping running with a corrupt database and repairing it on the fly, in the end worked. It cost them some millions per day, yes, but the bank continued to work.

    Just about the only thing one can't really defend against is a DDOS attack. No matter how well patched and firewalled a network is, when you have 10 GB/s stuffing your inbound pipe, you're stuffed.

    But here's the fun part about those: they work against one site at a time. Directing some tens of thousands of zombies to spew 10 GB/s at one site, yeah, stuffs it. Directing the same 10 GB/s at 10,000 sites, won't even start to matter. There is no way that can be a threat to the whole economy or anything.

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  24. anti globalism = anti americanism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm against passing away our soveriginity to international megacorporations and undisclosed power brokers. That makes me an anti-globalist. I am a patriot, and I would fight for the country if it came to open war (no the blood-for-oil, power and Israel war in Iraq does not count). I am in other words an anti-globalist patriot. I suppose that makes me a terrorist in the administrations eyes.

    1. Re:anti globalism = anti americanism? by arstchnca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is an all-too-common misconception that disagreeing with a nation's administration renders one "unpatriotic." As far as I know, the definition of a patriot remains "one who loves and defends his or her country."

      What many these days seem to fail to realize is that one's country and one's government are too very different things. If that were not the case, those fighting for America's freedom from British rule during the American Revolution, the quintessential example of an American patriot, would not be considered patriotic at all.

      I'd like to remind everyone that the kid wearing the "Fuck Bush" t-shirt is still very much a patriot, so long as he loves his country for blessing him with the freedom to express his beliefs that contradict the administration's policy.

      (And yes, I do realize that anyone kid wearing said t-shirt is, in all likelihood, doing so for attention rather than to further a political opinion.)

      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    2. Re:anti globalism = anti americanism? by ggzeama · · Score: 1

      The terms "anti-globalization", "north-south", "anti-corporatism" were invented and re-invented since mid 70 by the europeans, and they were used in the campain to discreditate the US; don't argue that this campaign didn't exists ... ask the leftists about it... or historians.
      Also, ask yourself what is the connection between the above terms and the financiar aid Europe has received after the WW2.
      When these ideas finally reached the masses, you look into a calendar and see that it's year 200X.

      Give me a break.

  25. Re:What's the BFD? by FooGoo · · Score: 1

    I beleive Debt of Honor was about about Japanese radicals crashing an airplane into the senate. Sum of All Fears was about islamic radicals nuking a stadium. (If I recall correctly)

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  26. The Truth Is Not Out There by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can't help but wonder, with the USA threatening Korea and Iran for their weapons programs, how the hell we get away with half the shit we make that has no usefullness outside of killing people. Like the new bomb they have developed, that kills all the people in a city, but does not damage any structures.

    1984 has come people. They have weapons of mass destruction and we must defend ourselves. They don't have weapons of mass destruction but we needed to remove a tyrant. We have, as a basic saftey gaurd against an overbearing government, the right to be secure in our papers and possesions unless a judge signs a warrents. It is war against terrorism, the FBI needs the powers to conduct searches without judicial overview. WTF???

    People, is the USA about to have a coup? It is one of the most common events in history. How many people in other countries expected the coup when it happened? I believe Bush will never leave office, or he will hand pick his sucessor.

    There are so many danger signs with that family. Bush's father was the chief of the CIA in the 1970s, he ran the CIA and did all the hiring of senior staff. Then he was VP for 8 years in the 1980's. He becomes president through the early 90's, then his son becomes president 8 years later. There is a saying that power currupts, and this family has been in the highest level of power for over 40 years, and that is not counting their grandfather who was in congress.

    This is more than haliburton or giving government contracts to friends. This is more than the spoils system. This is about jobs leaving the USA, about people having a lower standard of life, about more people becomming poor, about the rich getting richer, about government removing 200 year old rights gaurenteed to us by the founding fathers. What has happened the last 20 years should be a warning. A whole class of people is getting enslaved, to working for only enough money to pay for rent and very little low quality food.

    Just wait people. Those fingerprint machines in public libraries are not there because libraries are going bankrupt with non-members checking their emails.

    Most coups do not happen with the people overthrowing the government. Most coups happen when a powerful person gains too much influence and power, and takes over the military. But this coup will be about economics. The people with the money will have the lobbyists which will control the congress, and the rest of us will be relegated to nothings. Government will jail the loudest voices as terrorists. The rest will believe they are free, free to work for $9 an hour. Just wait.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Informative

      haha i love the fact that this was modded insightful! ive see this post in several other places.

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There by arstchnca · · Score: 1
      [...] war against terrorism, the FBI needs the powers to conduct searches without judicial overview. WTF???

      To quote the most (probably, I haven't reviewed them all) insightful line from the recent blockbuster -
      This is how liberty dies - to thunderous applause.
      --
      -- arstchnca
      --
    3. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There by corpsiclex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, 1984 came (and went) more than twenty years ago. Parent may want to review this article for a quick update on where things stand.

      --

      eBayDig 1s a typo saerch engien
    4. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There by subtropolis · · Score: 1

      For any coup to be half-way successful, i think they'd need to drop a neutron bomb (that was developed in the 70s, BTW) on K street in Washington. That's the real source of many of our problems.

      Well, there's always hope.

      --
      "Our interests are to see if we can't scale it up to something more exciting," he said.
    5. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There by DigitalSoldierX · · Score: 0

      If you think you are oppressed and being governed by a dictator than it is obvious to me that you have never set foot on foriegn soil outside of say a McDonalds in Canada or a Carribien cruise with your parents. In the event that you did go overseas to Africa, the Middle East or East Asia, you must have been wearing a blind fold the entire time.

      There will come a day when you we will be thankful that you live in the United States of America. Until that day comes, I recommend that you quit reading propaganda from the Revoultionary Communnist Youth Brigades(found on college campuses here in the U.S),and pick up a history book that discusses true dictators such as Pol Pot, Joseph Stalin, Eidi Amin, and Josip Broz Tito.

    6. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There by mink · · Score: 1

      Yes, and learn how many of this dictators we americans are responsable for either by overthrowing democratically elected government or proping up the dictator even in the face of horrible atrocities.

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  27. totally friggin off-topic, but by tulare · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got karma to blow here

    Does anyone else notice that /. has banned its own headline reader? HAHAHA!!!

    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    1. Re:totally friggin off-topic, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better is that it affected Google's personalized page service, too, and who knows what else

      http://www.google.com/ig

    2. Re:totally friggin off-topic, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. Re:What's the BFD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but the nuclear bomb was detonated in Baltimore so it was more like a spontaneous city-wide cleanup effort than anything.

  29. Wrong branch? by P0ldy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't this the NSA's job, or Homeland Security? I can't really see how this is gathering intelligence. Is this supposed to be Ops? TFA mentions

    "Information Operations Center, which evaluates threats to U.S. computer systems from foreign governments"

    , which is understandable, but the conventional notion of "terrorists" aren't "foreign governments". Does this mean we're expecting to go to cybercarpetbombing against France, the "anti-Americans"?

  30. Re:What's the BFD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WRONG. Debt of honor was about the Japanese, not Islamic militants.

    Do you even read books?

  31. It is probably recruitment by John+Seminal · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's wonderful that the CIA has such trustworthy people that wouldn't think of disclosing details of such a secure operation..... Oh, wait.

    Nah, we don't kill people. We play video games.

    Sometimes I think the Army and government recruits like a gang or drug dealer. They offer people with little hope in life a job. They offer training. Stop me if you have heard this one: "The Navy will train you how to work on nuclear submaries... do you know how much people who work on nuclear stuff make outside the navy? $100,000 cash. Cold cash. Come on, let me hook you up, we'll even give you $5,000 if you sign up. It is a cakewalk, in 4 years you'll be out, and while you are in, we'll show you exotic places, exotic pussy. What do you want to do? Work in a McDonalds the next 4 years trying to save money for college? Hell, you can't even read".

    Then the real story starts after boot camp. "You want me to do what? Tie a rope around my waist and drop down off the side of the battleship and clean the salt off the boat??" then in 4 years "My time is finally up. WHAT??? I got extended. By who?". And then the worst trick of all, 5 years later. "But I have nuclear experience, why can't I work for Ford? What, you exported all your jobs? Where??"

    They have to get people in one way or another. Army and government recruitment is like spam for making your penis bigger. They will rip off anyone they can. It is ashame we let them in highschools to sell their programs to kids under 18, to prep them for when they turn 18. Kids should need to have their parents sign an approval form for their kids in highschool to watch the recruitments.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  32. Greetings, Professor Falken by bnitsua · · Score: 1

    How about a nice game of Chess?

    (I apologize in advance... *somebody* had to make the reference)

    1. Re:Greetings, Professor Falken by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      HAHA

      I was waiting for it.

      Nice one!

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  33. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  34. You need to say it in a way that geeks understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "country" to which you are referring can be considered to be like a "process" and the "government" like a "thread".

    Only one thread can run at any given time and that thread defines the behavior of the process to all external viewers. At some point, context will switch and a new thread will run which will then define the process behavior by its actions.

    From the outside, it looks like it is the process going in one direction or another, but in actuality it is the behavior of the threads that they are seeing.

    So when some external viewer says, "Man, I hate that process," they are really saying that they hate what the current thread in that process is doing. Naturally, if all the threads in the process are doing bad things, then the process itself is seen to be bad, but in most processes there are a majority of good threads who simply don't get enough CPU time compared to the bad, errant threads.

    So any thread so designed can actually go back and fix to some extent the damage created by another thread. However, if the good thread doesn't fix the problem before an outside viewer sees it, or worse, is attacked by it, then the process as a whole is seen as bad.

    Once you start adding CPUs such that multiple threads within the same process can run simultaneously, you start running into things such as resource starvation and other bad things that are probably beyond the scope of this analogy. Needless to say, processes are not threads, but it is easy to confuse the two.

  35. How deep do you want to look? by MMaestro · · Score: 1
    Electronics are EXTREMELY embedded within modern American society. Sure it may seem like it doesn't extend beyond the internet, but it all depends on how far and deep you want to look into it...

    Socially: An electronics crash would result in mass social disorder. Loss of school records would mean weeks of paperwork sifting, confirming, checking and double checking to make sure people didn't make counterfeit diplomas. Throw in messed up court cases, work schedule mix ups and just general confusion and you've got a cripped country. Sure, on the local level things will continue to run acceptably, but above the state level? You've basicly gone into a time warp ~50 years backwards.

    Economically: You could make a career by being a consultant here. Messed up business deals, incorrect shipping orders, loss of time, loss of material, loss of product, loss of production, corporate sabotage, lost research, and again general 'wth is going on here?!' You could probably cause the stock market to crash a couple thousand points if you manage to hit enough of the big name corporations.

    Militarilly: A no-brainer. If terrorists knew that on X day and Y time, B soldiers in C country would lose all communications with their HQ (remember we use computer encrypted radio satellites now just in case the enemy overhears our troops talking over the radio saying that they've run out of toilet paper) the damage would be impossible to believe. No air or artillery support because you can't call in coordinates without your unsecure radio, lest the enemy triangulates onto the direction/location of the support fire and move to avoid/counter-attack it. No reinforcements because HQ is blind and don't want to send troops into an ambush. No extraction because you don't know if the area is secure or if the radio/camp/person calling in is compromised or not. Classic military nightmare scenario. No eyes, no ears, can't take risks, no guarantees, no intel.

    Thats not even going into diplomatic dangers (was a nuke suddenly launched and/or by who?), health care (how many people die each year because the 911 call center was too busy to respond to their call fast enough?) or simple electrical issues (sure there are generators, but lets be realistic, how many people/buildings having generators and how long do they last on average?) The list goes on.

  36. CMON MODS - THIS IS FUD - MOD DOWN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How the hell did this get modded up? First, it's completely off topic. Secondly, it's a soapbox rant that takes advantage of /. groupthink thereby giving the guy karma. Finally, half this shit he is spouting is complete crap. MOD DOWN.

  37. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  38. About time Some appreciates the Sweet Deal that is by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the military life. I get so annoyed with some of these active duty crybabies and their complaints about low pay.

    Let me tell you something, the military is a swank deal and everyone should stop crying wolf over a bogus issue. Let me break it down.

    Okay, so starting off, military pay is kind of on the low side. However, its not low considering the great benefits, which render the salary pure gravy. Especially considering, you're getting free paid training. How many companies offer free paid training, with total benefits, to completely unskilled people? Not many. You get free housing, all you have to do is pay for optionals like cable TV and telephone calls. But even that is subsided by the BAH II, which chips in some dough, tax-free, to you, to pay for things, like toilet paper and paper towels. Hell, your initial work clothes are given to you free, everyone else in the real world has to pay out of pocket.

    Replacement work clothes, aka BDUs, are paid for too. They give you a nice fat check to use to buy new clothing as you see fit.

    These things, and many many others, are sold at a heavily discounted rate .... Wholesale cost plus 5%. You have subsided entertainment options, you pay nothing for health, dental, mental health, or vision care. Your transportation costs are lower because the base has its own intra-base mass transit, and if you own a car, maintenance is a available at a discount rate,

    Plus you get 30 days of paid vacation and 12 federal holidays off a year. That's 42 day or 12% of the year off. That's 3xs the average of two weeks a year in the civilian world. The military even provides free travel on Space Available Flights, for, at worse a nominal fee, and there are often on base accommodations for members at discount. In addition to paid vacation time, you also receive unlimited paid sick leave. Plus there is no risk of being fired for using these benefits as very few soldiers are fired during their period of guaranteed employment. How many companies offer their wage slaves guaranteed employment? Again not many. This is because the military does not outsource its jobs overseas, rarely does it cut down on its numbers, and never does it fire anyway for anything less than gross incompetence or criminality. In many cases, criminal conduct is swept under the rung with a slap on the wrist thanks to Article 15s.

    As you mature,get older, and serve longer guess what? The deal gets even sweeter. You only have to serve twenty years and guess what? You get a free retirement for life, a giant, never ending 401k you didn't have to pay into. Its free money and you can start receiving, depending on the age of enlistment at 37. The VA begins to provide you with low cost healthcare upon retirement as well. You get the MGIB, which will pay for any college expense you may have left over. This should not be too much of a problem given the military already pays 100% of all college tuition of all people on active duty. If you went to college before enlistment, the military has programs, for student loan repayment. Soldiers who retired or leave after one enlistment get access to numerous other benefits like low cost VA housing lows, job training, and preferential hiring for government jobs, no matter how unqualified or incompetent they are, allowing them to beat out superior applicants.

    In addition, over those twenty years of service, you get multiple, guaranteed pay raises. You get more money for marrying and for each dependent you have, meaning the military pays you to fuck and have kids.

    So to brake it down: The military deal includes
    Free College
    Free Housing
    Free Health/Mental/Dental/Vision care (often for life)
    Free Retirement
    Free Paid Training
    Paid Vacation
    Unlimited Paid Sick Leave
    Guaranteed Raises
    Job Programs
    Subsided Shopping/ Transportation/ Entertainment
    Security Clearance

    (taken from http://www.kuro5hin.org/comments/2005/5/23/15739/0 556/20#20 )

    --
  39. Shouldn't that read "Anti-American-Globalization"? by Domini · · Score: 1

    The particular brand of globalization done by American people is to treat "the rest of the world" as yet another "Hawaii".

    Globalization can be good, pity some (non-internet enabled) Americans have a twisted idea of what it (the rest of the planet) is about. I think a re-education will solve all the problems, and not the hosting of a LAN. ;)

    This story is a case in point by grouping 'anti-American' and 'anti-globalization' into one concept. Showing just how easy it is to alienate the rest of the world (which should be an integral part of a globalization effort.

  40. RPG? by david.heyman · · Score: 1

    You sure this isn't just an elaborate version of a tabletop RPG game based on 24?

    1. Re:RPG? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dammit! We're running out of time! Lets hope I land on "Torture suspect"!

  41. Is that your attack strategy by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

    "Crash the network of your local 911 and see how many people die because the operator isn't able to find the address of a heart patient who can't speak well enough during the attack to give thier address."

    Is that you're terror attack strategy? Try to break into the 911 network just as someone who doesn't speak very good English, is having a heart attack?

    1. Re:Is that your attack strategy by thynk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that you're terror attack strategy? Try to break into the 911 network just as someone who doesn't speak very good English, is having a heart attack?

      Your response has shown me that I didn't make myself very clear in the posting. I was simply refuting the statement that no one dies when networks go down and provided a simple example to back it up.

      I'm not so small minded to think that attacking just the 911 system would be an effective terror attack. Now, take down the cell towers and phone exchanges in NYC would cause havoc enough, but do it while turning off the power grids and killing off the communication channels the emergency response units use to communicate to people in the field. With no way to contact police and emergency responce units, the greed and paranoia of 8 million people would quickly make a war zone look like a kindergarden.

      I could go farther, but I don't want to give up too many ideas to the RIAA/MPAA and the phone company to use for evil.

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
    2. Re:Is that your attack strategy by NigelJohnstone · · Score: 1

      My view is that critical systems should be kept on different Physical Nets like they are now rather than routed through the Internet.

      These 'cyber' attack strategies assume that Akmed in Iran can attack via the Internet and so talk of bringing down power grids & phone exchanges is worthless because he can't get a physical connection to those networks.

    3. Re:Is that your attack strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break it to you, but 911 systems crash all the time. Hell, here in Houston we spend a ton of money building a new 911 call center, and for the first year or so of operation, it crashed on a regular basis and people had to take notes on paper.

      Back when 911 was first put in place, people didn't have these fancy computers to figure out what was going on. I'm glad that the operators haven't grown soft since then and forgotten how to operate "stone age" equipment to make sure things get done without a computer.

  42. Slashdot has caught the political meme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There used to be a time when you could comment on such articles without it being turned into a political diatribe. This article is damn interesting and there could be some awesome commentary by some /.'ers. However you political numbnuts decided to turn this into soapbox rant afternoon.

    BTW, I am left-leaning as well, but for fucks sake keep your politics to yourself. It's completely off-topic yet gets modded up becuase of /. groupthink. Leave your political rants for the /. political threads.

    Cmon guys don't drag this place down a notch. It's annoying to sort through at +4/5 expecting cool comments but all you get is some guys off topic political rant that fits the /. atmosphere.

  43. US: want peace? then stop pissing people off!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    has it ever entered your thick skulls that if you stop pissing people off they might not want to hurt you?

  44. Re:What's the BFD? by FooGoo · · Score: 1

    In the book I think it was Denver. Been awhile since I read it though.

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  45. inversion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not conviced that causing economic damage to the US should be considered a 'bad guy' activity given the damage that the US is inflicting on the rest of the world.

  46. Re:What's the BFD? by Flutty · · Score: 1


    "I remember in 2000 or so, the internet went down and it wasn't that big of a deal." ... and if there is a cyber attack, how will we recognise it from a "normal" network problem. In some recent Denial of Service attacks on big internet names it took a while for this to be noticed as a concerted attack.

    I think we will blame lots of other things first before settling on an evil cyber terrorist hack.

  47. Some people rubbish the parent, but by panurge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They suffer from imagination deficiency. Apart from disrupting things like pipelines, which (as I discovered when working for a company that made pipeline parts, among other things) have some interesting design deficiencies, there is the potential to do things like change the schedule of estuarine sewage pumps so that they pump out on the rising, not the falling tide. Or change the dosing pump settings on water treatment plants. Most of the world is incredibly dependent on clean water and sewage treatment, with river pollution so high as to make untreated water undrinkable. Serious disruption to the water system would kill or make sick a lot of old people and young children - and, just like US and Russian landmines that are designed to injure children rather than kill them, this would have disruptive effects out of proportion to the numbers and economic activity of those affected.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Some people rubbish the parent, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and wargames is the perfect solution to that problem...or, well....no, actually. People that think it's a good idea to put utilities on the internet ought to be taken out and shot. I'm not sure what a fitting punishment would consist of for the eejits that actually put them there.

  48. Re:What's the BFD? by harishpa · · Score: 1

    Yes. They hired a guy from the consulting company that wrote the software that the stock exchange used and he put an Easter egg in the upgrade which hatched when a certain pattern of stock values occurred in a certain sequence.

  49. the solution to network attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disconnect the network cable from the computer.

    For home user - just cancel AOL and you be fine.

  50. Last time the lights went out in NY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/library/new s/2003/08/sec-030816-30e58190.htm

    There was some food spoilage, but for the most part everything was okay. No rioting, limited looting. Hardly a warzone.

  51. Has that story ever been verified? by Goonie · · Score: 1

    I've heard the Soviet pipeline software story before, and, frankly, I'm dubious. As told, there's no way the CIA could have known exactly how the software was going to be configured, and without that knowledge there's no way they could tell exactly what was going to happen when it went haywire. What if the explosion was in a densely populated area? Could you imagine the political consequences? The Soviets would have been able to say "sure, we steal technology, but the Yankee capitalist pigs slaughter thousands of innocent people.", and they would have been right. Reagan would have been impeached - even assuming the Soviets didn't decide to start rolling their tanks westward in response. I just can't see how the CIA would have taken the risk.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  52. Accused by who? by evilviper · · Score: 1
    Having been accused of lacking imagination about potential terror attacks,

    Uhh, the only one who accused the government of lacking imagination about potential attacks was the Bush administration, and those claims have been very throughly proven wrong...

    The "lack of imagination" is a defense... an alternative to saying "we actually knew the dangers and are grossly incompotent in protecting against them".
    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  53. The real Americans ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Are the real Americans the Amish ones in Pennsylvania, or the ones up the mountain villages in Arizona, or swimming the river in Sedona half way up the 'Mogollen' obstacle ?

    The ones who'll help you raise a barn, if you want to start a family ? The ones who'll let you scrump apples in the fall ?

    The ones who trek the donkeys up and down the Grand Canyon, or who keep the tents clean at the bottom if you want to walk ?

    How will this exercise help them ?

    1. Re:The real Americans ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are the real Americans the Amish ones in Pennsylvania, or the ones up the mountain villages in Arizona, or swimming the river in Sedona half way up the 'Mogollen' obstacle ?

      The ones who'll help you raise a barn, if you want to start a family ? The ones who'll let you scrump apples in the fall ?

      The ones who trek the donkeys up and down the Grand Canyon, or who keep the tents clean at the bottom if you want to walk ?


      Here's one.

      How will this exercise help them ?

      I'm not sure that much exercise is needed.

  54. Re:If you aren't with us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're against u, so I'm with v, w, and x.

  55. In Sovereign Slashdot... by Zorilla · · Score: 0
    --

    It would be cool if it didn't suck.
  56. Ahh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when the economy collapses, they'll blame it on hacker-terrorists.

  57. Hate to break it to you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the politics pervades every article now.

    Don't like Apple and want to say something? You'll get personally attacked and modbombed for your dissent.

    Don't think open source software is the cure all for things? Same.

    Slashdot is a place where people cry "information wants to be free!" but you are called a troll for merely having a different opinion and you get punished for it.

  58. Combination Attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While there are ways that a purely electronic attack would result in a loss of life (e.g. hitting a hospital), the greater danger would be a combination attack. Imagine, if you will, a combined physical (say biological) and electronic attack. The flow of information is extremely important during a biological attack (getting people out of the area in a manner that wouldn't result in a spread of the contagion, getting emergency services into the area, stopping panic etc.).

  59. Actually... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...the worst stuff doesn't happen at Gitmo. Allegedly the CIA has a small fleet of executive jets including the legendary N379P that regulary overfly Europe on their way to Egypt or some other place where people are still allowed to conduct what the KGB used to call 'Efficient interrogations' Amnesty international (quoting ex CIA employees) call it torture but who listens to them?.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
    1. Re:Actually... by LegendLength · · Score: 1
      ...Amnesty international (quoting ex CIA employees) call it torture but who listens to them?

      I'm sure there are even less people listening to them after their most recent 'report':
      Amnesty International says the United States, by its actions, is sending out a permissive signal to abusive governments and that is leading to more torture worldwide.
      Source


  60. Sept 11 by shish · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    to simulate an unprecedented, Sept. 11-like electronic assault ... a devastating cyberattack that affects government and parts of the economy on the scale of the 2001 suicide hijackings

    ...

    Will the American government please STFU about this already? Sure it wasn't very nice, but that's not a justification to tie it into every situation as a reason for doing things... By using "sept 11" as an excuse for every little thing, you're reducing the effectiveness where it matters :/

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
    1. Re:Sept 11 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clueless wonder, has Osama started to play nice? Or is he still calling for Jihad against the West. What does Osama wants my clueless friend? For us to leave him alone? That is all?

      I know you are a fool, forgive me, I actually witnessed people jumping out of the windows over 70 stories high, but is there any doubt in your mind that these folks wish to kill many more thousands of us in the West? Europe included.

    2. Re:Sept 11 by kd5ujz · · Score: 1

      The US is still calling for a "crusade" against Osama, so we are about equal.

      --
      -William
      God is everything science has yet to explain.
    3. Re:Sept 11 by shish · · Score: 1
      Clueless wonder, has Osama started to play nice?

      Fellow clueless wonder, did you even read my post? I never mentioned Osama -- To reiterate: Thanks to news reports like this, "Sept 11" is no longer a tragedy, but rather a political tool to make people miss points -- as you've just proved by missing mine.

      I think it should be seen as a tragedy, but so long as people like yourself get over-emotinal and under-logical every time it's mentioned, it's just going to get more and more abused by politicians.

      --
      I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  61. (p|s)equel poll by baadger · · Score: 1

    What would you rather see a seqeul or a prequel?

    (No 'neither' replies please)

  62. Re:About time Some appreciates the Sweet Deal that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And all you have to to for that is kill a few people or get killed?

    Where do I sign up?

  63. terrorism, communications, and electronic warfare by Senor_Programmer · · Score: 1


    In a conventional war you want to take out CCC infrastructure. No communications, no instructions, no control and the military s at a loss as to how to act

    Terrorism exploits communications infrastructure. It relies on a relatively low cost 'attack' generating 'terror' which would be hampered by crippling this infrastructure. The attack could be as simple as starting a rumor in the middle of flu season.

    Attacks on the credibility of news sources may already be in progress, Goodbye Dan, and cost little. Imagine a rail tank car full of "witch hazel" overturning in Yonkers. Just as news of the cleanup is moving from lead to fill, a little but of poisonous gas is released. Not much, just enough to make a few people really sick. This information is then fed into the internet blog space rumor mill making things look like a government coverup. From the governments point of view, a number of similar events over the course of a few months is a serious attack on it's credibility. Don't go all, "bush lied" on me now. That's totally different. Foreign policy, by it's very nature, can't be transparent. See Machievelli's 'The Prince'.

    Attacks on the economy will never be through direct attacks on communications. It'd too difficult for a small group to have significant impact. Petroleum pipelines, electric grid, water supply, levees after a majot rainfall event, are all much easier targets because of their node dependencies and relatvely low cost of 'taking out' a node.

  64. I can just imagine by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1, Funny

    Bill: "Operation eggplant is green." (I have just started outlook)

    Joe : "Affirmative Alpha7"

    Bob : "The goat is in the barn." (I have just started Internet Explorer)

    Joe : "Affirmative Alpha8. Alpha 7, go see Mother Hubbard." (Bill, check your email)

    Bill: "Negative Alpha1. Negotiation lost I -- *gaak*" (Joe, my machine just locked up)

    Joe : "Alpha8 has terminated." (Bill, begin reinstalling)

    Bob : "707" (Ha-ha!)

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:I can just imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be real easy - take the term being slashdotted to a higher plane.
      Bad country B sets ups multiple torrents with virtually unlimited content, in several spots,
      Plus Game servers
      plus a napster clone plus
      Plus celebrity pentagon porn, then posts the links on slashdot - where to get it. Sit back and watch.
      Oh, wait, thats why they are busting torrents now.

  65. You need to learn some history.. by wiredog · · Score: 1
    ...and adjust your tinfoil hat.

    the new bomb they have developed, that kills all the people in a city

    It's called the enhanced radiation weapon, or Neutron Bomb, and it's older than probably half the readership of this website, having been developed during the Carter administration back in the 1970's.

    As far as the coup thing goes, have you never heard of the 2nd Amendment and the NRA?

    1. Re:You need to learn some history.. by elrous0 · · Score: 0
      As far as the coup thing goes, have you never heard of the 2nd Amendment and the NRA?

      Let's get 'em boys, their armored tanks and missles are no match for our hunting rifles!

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  66. Re:Shouldn't that read "Anti-American-Globalizatio by mwlewis · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why people are so hung up on the combination of anti-globalization and anti-American. Is it that hard to imagine that there could be such people? I thought /.ers were a bit more technically minded, and could overcome kneejerk reactions and understand that

    (anti-Globalization + anti-American) => Enemy of USA
    Does not imply that
    anti-Globalization => anti-American

    And WTF does "treat the rest of the world as another Hawaii" mean, anyway? Most of the anti-Globalization stuff I've seen is basically a combination of protectionism and socialism. Globalization is basically people just doing stuff across borders they previously didn't cross so much.

    --
    JOIN US FOR PONG!
  67. Re:The Truth Is Not Out There--Rebuttals? by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

    Though the counterarguments are pretty strong; it isn't 1984 and 2nd Amendment and the NRA, like someone is going to sit on their porch with a rifle and stop "them varmints". On the other hand, the Bush family has been war profiteers since Prescott. They make the Mafia look like morons.

    Parent is a little off-topic, but really, the end of Democracy and the rise of indentured servitude is important enough to repeat.

    And I figured out he was talking about a Neutron bomb. I don't think it's an issue, because the mission seems to be to have a large starving population that will do anything for the corporate dole.

    --
    >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  68. Trading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    9-11 shut down the NYSE and most of the New Yorks financial markets for weeks, and confidence dropped sharply. It even affected trading elsewhere (i.e. Lloyd's of London closed for the afternoon) This is *far* more serious than a mere 3000 deaths to the people in charge, although they wont admit it as so.

  69. Re:MOD PARENT UP by pl1ght · · Score: 0

    You mean the Liberal Anti-US mind? Sorry speak for yourself and not the "HIVE"

  70. Anti-American I can understand... by synthespian · · Score: 1

    Worries with "Anti-American hackers" I can understand and sounds justified. But "Anti-globalization" seems to be too much on the side of a political agenda for a government agency, since it's just a political trend like any other (e.g., "right-wing").
    So, who's agenda is this? The CIA's or the original poster?
    I'm just asking because it's not clear.
    I would add, however, were I an American and this were a terminology employed by the CIA, that I would go to Thomas Jefferson's tomb and I would weep and wallow...Since when does an Intelligence agency get to have its political agenda? Oh, wait, I forget, this is the USA...

    --
    Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    1. Re:Anti-American I can understand... by pandymen · · Score: 1

      Does it really matter if it is a trend or not? At the moment the government is pushing a globalization agenda, so it makes sense at this point in time. It's not like they're doing war games every year for the next 20 years. OMFG, screw political correctness.

    2. Re:Anti-American I can understand... by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Well, it just happens to be my opinion that when you screw political correctness in government institutions, you screw these institutions.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
  71. the irony by jarkun · · Score: 1

    the internet was originally designed to provide a communications network that could survive a nuclear attack.....now the CIA thinks that a group of terrorists can take it out?

  72. The Feds should host a Hacker Convention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really. A giant, mega-sized hacker convention. Advertise it for several months, open it up to any participants who want to come, provide all kinds of network infrastructure hardware, servers, software, etc, which mimmicks a real-world system of networks and let the participants bring whatever hw/sw tools they want to plug in have a heyday with it. Have enough qualified experts and analysts on staff to observe and record all goings-on and publish the findings openly. I guarantee you it will be an enlightening experience in exposing a lot of weaknesses in the vendors' systems, weaknesses in systems administration, and it will expose tactics used by the hackers as well as how to defend against all sorts of bad stuff. Of course they'd have to guarantee that it's not a set-up to bust anyone, and they should allow... nay, *require* that every participant who shows up to use some randomly assigned fake code name to protect their real identity. It would be a grand experiment.

  73. agreed but you missed the problems by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1
    While you can get a desk job (my father did back in the 'Nam days), there is a very real chance that you'll be shot at in your career.

    The process of breaking you down to nothing and building you up again (aka boot camp) is something that a lot of us individualistic types get squeamish about. I'm certainly not a good candidate for military service simply because of my antipathy towards established authority. (I did take the ASVAB at one point... highest score the recruiter had ever seen)

    The hourly pay tends to really spiral down to below minimum wage as well in the non-com/enlisted ranks as well. Enlisted Navy on subs work ridiculous hours. (other ships in the fleet might also have this issue . . . but I had a good friend who was on a sub so I have more insight there)

    That said, the benefits can be amazing, particularly since the average Joe that the military will benefit the most is the kid with zero direction or discipline and no real future in society at 18 years of age. These kids can get in, do their stint, pick up valuable lessons of discipline and self esteem, and walk out in 4 years with enough cash to pay for a degree if they want it.
    Or they go the route of my father and become a "lifer", retiring after their 20 and collecting half pay the rest of their life. My father's case is particuarly interesting, as he was able to position himself early on in computing in the 70s and allow the goverment to pay for everything up to his MCSE. Since he's not particularly bound to "making a living" in his current job as he receives approx 30k a year salary from the USAF, he was able to take jobs early on in his second career as an administrator for peanuts, giving him quite the resume for his now permanent position with the FAA.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  74. That's certainly what the Iraqis are finding out by wiredog · · Score: 1

    as is the US Army.

  75. Why fear an internet attack??? by ObscureKaffine · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't any critical data be stored on a stand alone box anyways??? Or atleast backed up on one??? The easiest way to secure a computer is to allow no network/ internet access at all

    1. Re:Why fear an internet attack??? by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      "Shouldn't any critical data be stored on a stand alone box anyways??? Or atleast backed up on one??? The easiest way to secure a computer is to allow no network/ internet access at all."

      There is one major fallacy to your argument -- many industries have inappropriately tied internal
      networks to the internet. Some have even gone so far as to tie SCADA networks to the internet for "ease of remote communication/command/control".

      The Dubya regime has seen fit not to regulate the petrochemical, chemical, or power industries' methodologies for maintaining secure networks -- the very best that the DHS/CIA/NSA etcetera have been able to do is to furnish broad guidelines.
      The same type of broad guidelines that DHS has offered for hazardous plant security. Unfortunately, many of the corporations see this only in terms of increased cost, and not a way to mitigate catastrophic liability. Instead, the much-abused taxpayer is on the hook for whatever cleanup costs will be for the next domestic terrorist attack, as usual.

    2. Re:Why fear an internet attack??? by ObscureKaffine · · Score: 1

      I know where you're coming from.... I guess mine is more of a "in a perfect world" argument. I like my perfect world, where actual Logic rules.

  76. Reality Check by part_of_you · · Score: 0
    I seriously doubt that all they did was test power grids, and hospitals, and tall buildings for security measures. They probably wanted to just make sure that the systems that control our missles and bombs and shit like that were locked down pretty good.

    ...In other news, President Bush is instructed to NOT write his e-mail password on Cheney's ass anymore.

  77. say hello by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you lookin' at? You all a bunch of fuckin' assholes. You know why? You don't have the guts to be what you wanna be? You need people like me. You need people like me so you can point your fuckin' fingers and say, "That's the bad guy." So... what that make you? Good? You're not good. You just know how to hide, how to lie. Me, I don't have that problem. Me, I always tell the truth. Even when I lie. So say good night to the bad guy! Come on. The last time you gonna see a bad guy like this again, let me tell you. Come on. Make way for the bad guy. There's a bad guy comin' through! Better get outta his way!

    just saw that movie for the first time ever last week. on a downloaded torrent no less

  78. Well, no by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    "Having been accused of lacking imagination about potential terror attacks, they're using the exercise to better shape the government's roles in a variety of attack scenarios."

    No - they're actually DEVELOPING these attack scenarios to see which ones they can use themselves on the US to justify more extensive "government roles."

    This is what the CIA DOES, folks. That is their reason for existing.

    We still aren't sure where Robert Morris got the nice, clean code (mixed in with his amateurish code) to develop the Morris worm. Hint: his father worked for the NSA as a computer security expert. Some people think the Worm was a tactic called "pulsing the system" in intelligence circles.

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  79. Yes, at NASA at least by alispguru · · Score: 1

    Has any progress been made in the last few years on improving the state of government computer security?

    NASA used to be the part of the US Government with the cyber "Kick Me" sign on its butt - lots of machines, administered mostly by scientists who cared more about getting their work done than security. The prevalence of desktop Macs was probably the only thing that kept the place from being totally 0wned.

    No more, at least at Goddard where I work. Machines are much better administered, and we live behind a very tight firewall. Network security routinely wardrives the grounds, and people with guns (!) will show up if you have an unauthorized wireless access point.
    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  80. Landmines by sean.peters · · Score: 1
    and, just like US and Russian landmines that are designed to injure children rather than kill them, this would have disruptive effects out of proportion to the numbers and economic activity of those affected.

    Oh, please. Quote for me the models of US landmines that are designed to injure children. I suspect you've been drinking the anti-landmine kool-aid. Almost every mine in the US inventory (and EVERY mine used outside the Korean peninsula) is self-destructing or self-neutralizing, which minimizes injury to non-combatants.

    More detail here.

    Sean

  81. Am I the only one by denissmith · · Score: 1

    who finds it disturbing that "anti-globalization hackers" are the new boogey man here? Since when were they engaged in terrorism? Street fighting, maybe, but terrorist cells?

    --
    I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
  82. They've been doing this for years.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason why you don't hear much about this, is because the government is keeping it very low key because there is a REAL threat.

    I do know it is possible to "simulate" such threats through complex "traffic generators" that can effectively emulate large scale DDOS attacks.

    Most military academies already have extensive "Electronic warfare" classes with very impressive computer labs working on creating a large number of Scenerios.

    IP tracking software is getting more sophisticated, and IRC "pattern usage analysis" is identifying "spam bots" and "zombie controllers". The Honeynet is also getting into the act by analysing comprimised hosts.

    -j

  83. Yeah... Right... Look at their choice of aggressor by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

    They didn't say "infoterrorists", they didn't say "communists", they didn't say "mafia" or "organized crime"...

    They said "Anti-American" and "Anti-Globalization". Note how the two are assumed to be in the same general "evil" sphere. This is probably low-key propaganda designed to make people associate "Anti-Globalization" with "Anti-American", at least subconsciously, the way "communist" was back in the fifties. Otherwise, why would they even tell anyone about it?

    I think this says quite a bit about the priorities of the U.S. government right about now... Don't you?

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  84. Re:What's the BFD? by prichardson · · Score: 1

    Whoa there, sport. Flying jumbo jet into a building is the natural evolution of flying a single-man fighter into a battleship.

    Tom Clancy (sexist, racist, homophobic pig and mediocre author) had nothing to do with it.

    --
    Help I'm a rock.
  85. Well I'm an... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...anti-American and anti-globalization hacker...
    ...so the CIA labels me a "bad-guy"!

    Way to make more friends around the world, US Gov't! Watch for low-flying planes, assholes.
  86. How reassuring... by Hosiah · · Score: 1

    They're going to get together and play a video game for three days that simulates an attack. In other words, they're going to get innovative by using an idea from a 1980's movie. No wonder they're at the mercy of every W00t 133t script kiddie who comes along...

  87. Re:MOD PARENT UP by shish · · Score: 1
    Liberal Anti-US mind

    What did I say that was anti-US? I said I was fed up with "Sept11" being used as an excuse for things that are totally unrelated (really, how is a website defacement in any way comparable to several thousand people dying?). It's simple logic that if you want to give a reason for something, your reason should have some relation to the thing you want to do -- or is common sense against The American Way? Again, what logic is there in comparing a digital wargame to sept 11, other than to get attention and to jump on the "they mentioned sept 11, you'd have to be a terrorist to not support them!" bandwagon?

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment