Slashdot Mirror


Service Robots in Service by 2010

Igor Birman writes "Reuters reports that Toyota aims to sell service robots by 2010. Meanwhile, the most advanced consumer robot produced in the US appears to be the iRobot Roomba, now available in pink. More information is available at Robotics Trends and NewsTarget.com"

229 comments

  1. We are here to protect you. by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    From TFA:

    Toyota Motor Corp. (7203.T: Quote, Profile, Research) aims to start selling robots that can help look after elderly people or serve tea to guests by 2010, the Asahi daily reported on Tuesday.

    Reading this, I can't help but think of this excerpt from The Terribe Secret of Space:

    Grandma is protected
    Grandma has gone down the stairs
    We are here to protect you
    From the terrible secret of space

    We are the space robots
    Grandma is protected
    Grandma is protected
    At the bottom of the stairs

    I am the pusher robot
    Shoving is the answer
    I will shove grandma
    Outside into the snow

    I am the shover robot
    Pushing is the answer
    I will push snow
    On top of grandma

    ^_^
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  2. Pink Roombas? by justforaday · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yoshimi should be able to take care of those Roombas with no problem...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    1. Re:Pink Roombas? by kakashiryo · · Score: 0

      Nice referal to The Flaming Lips' album.

      However, what would she chose as her method of disassembly? Kung Fu, Karate, or a la Matrix Style?

      Silly robots.

    2. Re:Pink Roombas? by phixson · · Score: 1

      According to Weekend Update anchor, Tina Fey (sp?) - "It's the little pink robot that cleans your noonie."

    3. Re:Pink Roombas? by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      That's why she's taking her vitamins.

    4. Re:Pink Roombas? by utexaspunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      However, what would she chose as her method of disassembly? Kung Fu, Karate, or a la Matrix Style?

      maybe she'd just use the stairs...

    5. Re:Pink Roombas? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Exterminate! Exterminate!

      --
      Why not fork?
    6. Re:Pink Roombas? by blackicye · · Score: 1

      She won't let those robots destroy us!

  3. Half a decade hence... by TopSpin · · Score: 4, Funny

    Date line May 31, 2005:
    Toyota Motor Corp. aims to start selling robots that can help look after elderly people or serve tea to guests by 2010.

    Date line April 1, 2011:
    A Japanese pensioner was found dead today beneath a mountain of tea cups and saucers. A relative claims a Toyota robot given to the man a year before continued to carry out it's tea serving prerogative for months after the victim had expired.

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    1. Re:Half a decade hence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      How true, Mr 753. From what is seen on slashdot, you have accurately predicted that by 2011, even newspapers will incorrectly use its/it's.

    2. Re:Half a decade hence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, a Schrodinger's Apostrophe, I see. Totally unpredictable, these apostrophes cause plural's and even it's when it's ITS.

    3. Re:Half a decade hence... by amembleton · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a Red Dwarf episode. The one where they find kryton, he is preparing meals, washing and generally caring for the all female crew of a ship that crashed on some planet. The crew are all dead but he carries on looking after them.

    4. Re:Half a decade hence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know whether now's the time to tell you, but my friend Rimmer is very, very brave.

  4. Patent Pink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better patent the pink color before Japan steals it away...

  5. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're going to have a /. story everytime a robot appears in a new colour

  6. Demand by suso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Japan's top automaker sees a declining birthrate and aging population leading to growing demand for robots that can help in tasks such as child care and nursing care

    What? I don't know where these companies determine the demands that people have. People have been trying to make machines that could automatically mow a lawn for over 50 years now. I would think there would be a really high demand for robots that could do lawn care, take out the trash and clean the house. At least those tasks I could trust a robot to do properly and shouldn't be all that difficult if they are also "really" capable of caring for a child. Personally, it would be a long time before I would trust robotic technology and AI to care for a human being's health and safety.

    1. Re:Demand by Mike+Peel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And a few decades down the line, no-one bothers moving from their armchair. Why bother, when you can ask your robot to go get whatever you want?

      Obesity and muscle wastage, here we come *...

      * Excluding America; some of them are already there.

    2. Re:Demand by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 1
      Personally, it would be a long time before I would trust robotic technology and AI to care for a human being's health and safety.

      It's hardly a primary carer, and isn't suggested as one. It's only meant to assist the eldery (amongst the other suggested uses).

      While it's good that their being ambitious stating a 2010 arrival, I'm sceptical that they will deliver on time if at all.

      __
      Laugh Daily free video clips
    3. Re:Demand by KUHurdler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those auto mowing machines are already quite possible. The problem is that no one wants to be liable for version 1.0, that malfunctions and mows over the neighbor kids.

      That, and the fact that it is cheaper to just hire those neighbor kids to mow their lawn.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
    4. Re:Demand by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

      "Why bother, when you can ask your robot to go get whatever you want?

      Obesity and muscle wastage, here we come *..."

      To avoid being obese and wasting your muscles?

      That's like saying why meet in person when you can talk online or on the phone - because there are still recognized benefits to meeting in person.

    5. Re:Demand by delirium28 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Umm, ever heard of Robomow? Granted, you still need to push the big green "Go" button to get it started, but it's still better than doing it yourself.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    6. Re:Demand by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Well, this is sort of a matter of perspective. Ever fly anywhere on an Airbus? Robo-take-offs-and-landings! Ever bang into something with your late-model car? Robo-ish-airbags! Life saving (or ending!) pharmaceuticals? Robo-made-drugs!

      Yes, yes, these aren't walk-around-the-house robotic type things, but they're complicated, sensor-driven, hardware/software things that operate in life-and-death cirumstances to make things easier or better for people. It's not that we don't have semi-autonomous widgets in life-critical roles, it's just that they aren't in anthropomorphized form factors.

      I suspect that there's nothing at all (other than price) stopping us from having a proper robo-lawnmower. It's just a lot cheaper, long-term, to hire local teenagers at $10/hour, and use a $250 mower from Sears. Or, a couple of goats. In fact, from the goat angle, you could say that we've been bio-engineering auto-homing, self-guiding, hazard-avoiding lawnmowers for centuries. Plus, you can use them to make cheese and felt, too, and they fertilize the soil while they're working.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    7. Re:Demand by kesuki · · Score: 1

      key word 'help'

      These are not fully autonymous robots.

      these are worker drones, meant to allow for the care of elderly/children with _less_ human interaction. Imagine if one human operator in central control can operate 250 'healthcare bots' in a nursing home that holds 5,000 patients.

      you could cut the amount of healthcare workers needed for a full size nursing home from hundreds to dozens. this has already happened in auto manufacturing, and it's clear that this is toyota's goal. a robotic nursing home system, where cheap affordable robot workers can help grandma into the wheelchair when you go visit her, etc.

    8. Re:Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      People have been trying to make machines that could automatically mow a lawn for over 50 years now.

      What percent of the japanese population has lawns that need mowing? Come back to this post when you have an answer and you will realize that a lawn mowing robot in japan would be about as useful as a snow blower in the sahara.

      With that in mind, the japanese do have a demand for robots in nursing/healthcare. In America we are already using robots in healthcare. The local hospital where I live has a robot that hands out medication to patients.

    9. Re:Demand by nizo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thats why they also plan on releasing "The Exerbot", a robot that chases you around the house with an axe so you get enough exercise. With promises of "... a body like a Viking..." you can bet people will buy millions of them.

    10. Re:Demand by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I would think there would be a really high demand for robots that could do lawn care

      I suspect the robot will still be more expensive than cheap (often immigrant) labor. As long as employers get away paying humans sub-living wages, these robots will be impractical.

      BTW I'm for immigration, but against slave wages.

    11. Re:Demand by hraefn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not? Many humans are incapable of providing care for another human's health and safety, but are nonetheless allowed to do so.

    12. Re:Demand by Paul+Slocum · · Score: 1

      Not quite that simple, you have to install powered wires around the perimeter of the lawn and... My friend had one and was really a big advocate at first, but had problems with it getting stuck, taking forever to finish sections, the hassle of checking on it and moving it from section to section, having to manually mow some parts... He finally sold it and now just does it the old fashioned way. The Robomow was fun to watch though.

    13. Re:Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats why they also plan on releasing "The Exerbot", a robot that chases you around the house with an axe so you get enough exercise. With promises of "... a body like a Viking..." you can bet people will buy millions of them.

      "We're so confident in our product that we guarantee that you'll either look like a Viking or like one of their victims."

    14. Re:Demand by Valar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You obviously can't make a blanket statement about that, because robots already _have_ replaced some human workers in manufacturing, for example. Now, are you likely to see humanoid robots with human like intelligence walking into your office building carrying their briefcases in the next couple of decades? No, probably not. Gradually, more and more labor will be performed by robots though. It is merely industrialization continuing-- capital displaces labor.

    15. Re:Demand by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just my two cents from out here in fly over country- Here in Ohio, you see the "robot" farm machinery all the time- There are threshers, harvesters etc that have GPS and all the toys and do a lot of the grunt work of a farm by wire. Of course, as it is in everything in the US, liability is a chief concern. You don't want a huge harvester running alone running over a kid or something, so often times, even though it is unnecessary to have one, there is an "operator" along for the ride.
      Also, as far as lawn mowers- when i was in college I used to work summers on a golf course, and during my coffee break I would read the turf grass magazines (there was no other reading material) and there were articles (this was 6 years ago) about the mowers that followed the underground wires. Once again, the chief issue was not reliability or quality, but liability.
      On a semi related note- have you seen the dogs that are trained to help disabled people? The ones that can open the fridge (with a special handle) and bring the owner a beverage? Those are amazing... But it also begs the comparison about how things are cyclical- automatic lawn mowers used to be called goats... then man does it himself for a hundred years or so, and now, robots do what goats used to...
      If a man speaks in the forest, and there is no woman there to hear him, is he still wrong?

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    16. Re:Demand by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

      It is difficult to express forcefully enough how tiresome your little pious pronouncements are. Something like "Blow it out your a**", comes to mind. I've got karma to burn so this seems like a sufficiently good cause.

    17. Re:Demand by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1
      You obviously can't make a blanket statement about that...

      Well, yes. In some instances the skill level requires higher human pay, making the robot more competitive. In others, the robot is more precise or quicker at repetitive tasks. Far enough in the future, the automation cost will come down.

      For now, I don't expect to see the Borg trimming my hedges.
      If I do, I will shake my cane at them and yell "Get off my lawn, punks!"

    18. Re:Demand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course, as it is in everything in the US, liability is a chief concern. You don't want a huge harvester running alone running over a kid or something

      So you're saying that if it weren't for the liability it'd be OK to run over a kid or something? Maybe they could just put loudspeakers and a recording saying "Hey you kids! Get out of here!"

    19. Re:Demand by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      What happens when there's an unexpected object in the way like a tree root, lawn chair or small child?

      Sure, maybe it has some limited sensors to detect some objects, but robots always have a problem dealing with the unexpected.

      With the Roomba for example, you often need to re-arrange furniture to be more 'robot-friendly' because the robot can't deal with obstacles like an unexpected chair leg or a persian rug.

    20. Re:Demand by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      Most humans can quickly learn how to take care of another human's health and safetly. A robot can't learn at all.

    21. Re:Demand by OlRickDawson · · Score: 1

      You mean, make the lawn mower middle aged curmudgeon... "Hey you kids,stay off my lawn!!!"

      --
      Ol' Rick Dawson had a farm EIEIO
    22. Re:Demand by Psamtik · · Score: 1

      Well if social security is paying for people to help do that themselves (and is about to die) and if the US has a dreadfully low savings rate (which wouldve helped it live longer) then the Japanese have bypassed their enire "what do we do with old people" problem using discipline and technology. They already have a massive savings rate and now have the robots to spend that money on. Problem solved. American car makers (and the rest of corporate america), however, appear to believe that social problems affect them little (which is a mystery considering the poor education that banes the corporate world, the environmetal problem it ignores and will have to pay for, and the unions it got out of trying to monopolize) and will continue to produce more crap that only encourages mindless consumption, as opposed to solutions...like the roomba.

      --
      We don't inherit the earth from our parents. We borrow it fom our children.
  7. Service robots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't be posting on /. because of the captchas.

    You failed to confirm you are a human. Please double-check the 7-letter image and make sure you typed in what it says.

    1. Re:Service robots... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still haven't seen any of those around here...

  8. Roomba is hardly the only one by Rei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's everything from robotic lawnmowers to the upcoming Scooba mopbot.

    --
    Aeris Died For Your Sins.
    1. Re:Roomba is hardly the only one by Blackneto · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Woomba.
      It keeps your business clean.
      Your lady business...

      --
      Ursula Andress, Catherine Deneuve, and Charo, twice...
    2. Re:Roomba is hardly the only one by BreadMan · · Score: 1

      I looked at the specs, and this isn't a mower for the US; it has the ability to cut only about .25 acre. If you have > .25 acre lot, get a reel lawn mower, as you don't have much grass after your house + driveway. Most folks in the outer 'burbs have much more grass to cut; when you head into the mid-west, 1 - 2 acres isn't uncommon.

      The mowing isn't the problem, a good mower will make short work out of a 1 - 5 acre lot. Weeding the flower beds, applying mulch and doing the trimming take the most time, it would be nice to have a robot do that work.

    3. Re:Roomba is hardly the only one by juanfe · · Score: 1

      This new Roomba DOES look surprisingly like the Woomba.

      Who'd have thought that reality imitates satire?

      --
      ***Foucault is watching you..***
    4. Re:Roomba is hardly the only one by nilptr46 · · Score: 1

      I prefer the less expensive RoboMaid

    5. Re:Roomba is hardly the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're both overpriced pieces of junk.

      That "robomaid" isn't even worth $20.00, its flimsy plastic and an electric Hamester-chases-ball type toy inside.

      If you had an area where one of these doodads would work efficiently, you could just get off your lazy ass and sweep/vacuum said area in five minutes.

  9. Toyota? by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For years I've been watching Honda pimp Asimo and you're telling me Toyota is the company to first bring us robots. Surprising. So where's Nissan in all this hubbub, or do they need not even apply.

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    1. Re:Toyota? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

      For years I've been watching Honda pimp Asimo and you're telling me Toyota is the company to first bring us robots. Surprising. So where's Nissan in all this hubbub, or do they need not even apply.

      I have a Ford robot here at home. It's crackling and leaking hydraulics all over the carpet...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Toyota? by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      I honestly do wonder if this could be the next stage of the automobile wars.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    3. Re:Toyota? by davidmcw · · Score: 1

      I think Nissan have decided they are a car company and that so long as they are still making cars, everything is just fine, thank you very much.

      It may be the huge Renault/ non-Japanese influence @ Nissan, but they don't really feel the need to be all things to all men/ old people/ people with laws and big buckets of money/ old people that like tea but can't make it anymore.

      --
      Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
    4. Re:Toyota? by sjf · · Score: 1

      Hell, that's nothing. In the UK, over 40 years ago we had the Rover 2000 it was an absolute dog of a machine and had a tendency to take a leak all over the floor.

  10. By 2011... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the streets and public spaces are now devoid of men as they no longer have cause to go out.

  11. I'm still waiting for advance... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in AI voice processing so we start having those cool robotic butlers and dishwashers (Who actually pick up your plates and sweep the floor).

    I find it amazing that hardware is advancing WAY beyond software.

    1. Re:I'm still waiting for advance... by RealityMogul · · Score: 1

      Hardware advancement? Where's the hardware advancement in robots? It's motors and circuits and sensors.

      It's still software that ties those components together in a meaningful way.

    2. Re:I'm still waiting for advance... by cayenne8 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      "in AI voice processing so we start having those cool robotic butlers and dishwashers (Who actually pick up your plates and sweep the floor)."

      I guess I'm one of the old fashioned kinds, that thinks the best way to get the dishwasher loaded...is to buy the her a bottle of wine

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    3. Re:I'm still waiting for advance... by hunterx11 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you ever watched The Jetsons? We'll have fully autonomous, sentient robots before we have decent voice synthesis.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    4. Re:I'm still waiting for advance... by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hardware without software == paper weight.

      Advanced robots require software, some very sophisticated, some very simple. Just moving a robot in an environment can be quite challenging, hardware doesn't do this by itself.

    5. Re:I'm still waiting for advance... by PaulDineen · · Score: 1

      It's not amazing. Hw is just muscle. Sw is the brain.

  12. Uh huh by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

    I love these types of executive decision.

    Yes, we're planning on regular scheduled trips to the moon next year, I'll just crack the whip on the R&D slaves to get them to work a bit harder.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Uh huh by Peldor · · Score: 1
      Yes, we're planning on regular scheduled trips to the moon next year, I'll just crack the whip on the R&D slaves to get them to work a bit harder.

      Thank you, sir! May I have another?

      Sorry. It's a reflex from toiling in the R&D mines.

    2. Re:Uh huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oblig. Simpsons quote:
      Homer: [to staff] Are you guys working? Man 1: Yes, sir, Mr. Simpson. Homer: Could you, um... work any harder than this? Man 2: Sure thing, boss. [staff immediately start typing faster] Homer: Hey, call me Homer.
      Episode 3F23
  13. We have feelings too you know by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    This post was submitted by

    iRobot Slash-Postba

    Serial NO : AR-3214324-ERE43

    Activation date : May 31 2005

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:We have feelings too you know by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      This movie did not have enough screw-sorting in it.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  14. cheapest robot you can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the Illegal Mexican Immegrant.

    You can rent it for less then $5 an hour and it will do whatever you tell it.

    1. Re:cheapest robot you can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the Illegal Mexican Immegrant. You can rent it for less then $5 an hour and it will do whatever you tell it.

      Indeed, and exactly like a real robot, it doesn't understand the commands you give it. Stricking eh?

    2. Re:cheapest robot you can buy by erlenic · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you know Spanish, which is common enough, you can give them commands just fine.

    3. Re:cheapest robot you can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats what I need!

      A mexican robot that will shout commands in spanish to manage all my aliens..

    4. Re:cheapest robot you can buy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translate this:

      Vete para el carajo gringo cabron de mierda :)

  15. Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From TFA :... growing demand for robots that can help in tasks such as child care

    We already have mindeless mechanical devices to raise our kids, it's call "TV" and it is much cheaper than robots.

  16. How long until... by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I can get an alcohol drinking loudmouth robot, preferably one who is proficient at bending?

    1. Re:How long until... by 1967mustangman · · Score: 1

      If I remember correctly he was born somewhere between 2995 and 2997. So it might take a while.

      --
      Madre de Dios! Es El Pollo Diablo! -- Captain Blondebeard
    2. Re:How long until... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Something like this would be a good start for the "drinking alcohol" part (I'm not sure how well it would handle watered-down alcohol or flavorings...).

      --
      Aeris Died For Your Sins.
    3. Re:How long until... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...I can get an alcohol drinking loudmouth robot, preferably one who is proficient at bending?"

      Are you nuts!?! If ANYTHING would cause mass hysteria and a general fear/hatred of robots, it would be them drinking our booze.

      Something like that would stop the industry dead in it's tracks.

    4. Re:How long until... by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Like most things, caring for the elderly is just a degenerate form of bending.

      Brett

  17. can they handle a flying car? by Cryofan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    cuz this sounds like more vaporware, considering the American sociopolitical landscape

    Corporations go for the low-hanging fruit. Therefore, I doubt we will see any real funding for really useful robots so long as 3rd world "neoslaves"...oops! I mean "illegal aliens"....oops! I mean "undocumented workers" are allowed to move to the USA as cheap and desperate scab labor to fatten the wallets of investors and business owners and management.

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
    1. Re:can they handle a flying car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean "as long as white people are too lazy to work." My brother in law bitched for 3 months about not being able to find a job until I sent his resume to UPS. Funny, now he has health insurance, benefits, and *gasp* work's for a living. He's still mad at me.

    2. Re:can they handle a flying car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, this really is an amazing story. UPS doesn't tend to hire whiney woe is me bitches for long.

    3. Re:can they handle a flying car? by twifosp · · Score: 1
      Using your cynical (yet realistic) logic, robots will replace "undocumented workers" as soon as possible.

      You only have to buy a robot once. You don't pay income, or income tax. The robot always shows up. Provided it has matience costs lower than health care costs (not that you pay health care costs for illegal aliens), it will be cheaper in the long run.

      Which brings it to the next economic problem. As robots become moer dynamic instead specialized welders for exmaple, and are able to replace more and more labor jobs; we lose a hole bottom tier of income and purchasing power in our economy. We'll likely make up for it with other jobs, but then again, the American cynic in me says that's unlikely.

      Robots, Soma, and Illegal Aliens.... it's a brave new world.

    4. Re:can they handle a flying car? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " We'll likely make up for it with other jobs..."

      myth.

      Lets say I have a robot factory, and it employes 100,000 people(more then McDonald Douglas in its glory years) but I build a robot capable of only being able to make burgers.
      I would put a million plus people out of worker. plus a huge loss on all the people they pay for goods.
      as my robots get more advanced, more and more people will loose there jobs.

      SO that means we will nede to adapt our culture to be able to support these people. If we don't there will be riots and it will be very ugly.

      Personaly, I think corporation should not be allowed to own robots, and individuals can own 1. That was more and more people can send there robot to work while they enjoy life. So they have an income, and lots of free time.
      Casue life isn't about work.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. iRobot Roomba Most Advanced? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Roomba is so simple it might not even make a good Senior Project. Bump and Reverse is not quite artificial Intelegence.

  19. Video feed: by ets960 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the video feed of the robots in motion http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/special/robot/

    1. Re:Video feed: by NoNeeeed · · Score: 1

      Remember...

      "All sufficiently advanced technology is indestinguishable from a rigged demo"

      I have seen lots of these sorts of videos showing robots walking around on a stage and playing silly games, but I have yet to actually see any perform the kinds of tasks that people claim they will be capable of "in just a few years from now". In fact I have seen few that perform anything like that kind of task.

      To perform many of the tasks that people are suggesting for these things, we will need some serious improvements in general AI. We know how to program AIs to solve many specific problems, but the kind of self directed problem solving, combined with human interraction, in the real world is going to be really damn hard.

      I really want to see this kind of thing work, and I'm gld to see people trying, but I'm sceptical that these guys can deliver what they promise in the timescales they suggest.

      I wait to be surprised and delighted, but I'm not holding my breath.

    2. Re:Video feed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but I'm not holding my breath.

      Of course not. You would die.

    3. Re:Video feed: by ajna · · Score: 1

      Anyone know where to find a sound clip of the two Toyota trumpet-playing robots whose video link can be found in the parent post?

    4. Re:Video feed: by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      You dumbass.

      That's the point of the expression, that you will not hold your breath until that time, because you'd die.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Video feed: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's what I mean. Who would hold their breath waiting for something, even for an hour? I think you would probably die in an hour. Maybe one and a half if you were one of those guys who could hold there breath for an hour.

  20. I'm investing in some insurance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. As always... by Stanistani · · Score: 1

    Long ago Robert Heinlein envisoned household robots (see Flexible Frank in "The Door into Summer",) as the 'killer app' in robotics, as opposed to the 'killer bots' the military is developing.

    1. Re:As always... by 3770 · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I wouldn't be surprised if the sex industry is one of the top three killer app's that drives this technology forward.

      It seems they are driving the adoption of many technologies these days.

      --
      The Internet is full. Go Away!!!
    2. Re:As always... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the famed science fiction philosophers William Hanna and Joseph Barbera.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    3. Re:As always... by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      So the consensus is that the robot of the future will (a) cook a mean omelette and leave the kitchen spotless afterwards, (b) be capable of really great kinky sex, and (c)be capable of infiltrating enemy territory and single-handedly taking out a column of tanks with heat-seeking missiles.

      Good in the kitchen, great in the sack, strong and self-sufficient, and with teraflops of processing power... wow, sounds like my ideal woman. Naturally, there would be a model for the women as well (as a computer, it would *never* forget a birthday/anniversary!)

    4. Re:As always... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      (as a computer, it would *never* forget a birthday/anniversary!)

      oh it will forget something. it will have to, otherwise the women won't want it.

      Not having anything to complain about and all....

      ducks, runs away.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:As always... by Elsebet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This reminds me of the "escort" type of robots in the movie Artifical Intelligence: AI. When people refer to automation causing job loss they seem to refer to it in the sense of low level labor or manufacturing. I feel intimate robots who would be self-cleaning (safer health-wise), unable to be impregnated, and agreeable to any act imaginable would wipe out the high and middle prostitution market for "real" people. The low end would likely still see human demand as these robots may be priced out of the market of that segment for some time.

      I wonder what impact robots will have on the current legality of prostitution and various taboos like animal/child sex. Will having relations with a cyborg child be illegal or still considered unethical? What about a robot dog?

      There is also to ponder the case of the spouse who seeks what some call "strange"; the burning desire to sleep with a person apart from their current partner. Would an intimate session with a robot be an acceptable substitute to both parties? Would a person be justified in feeling cheated upon if their spouse slept with a collection of wires, gears, motors, and software?

      --
      Sacré-bleu! Where is me mama?
  22. Given Their Abilities With Cars... by tquinlan · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...and the fact that they're technologically way ahead of just about everyone else in that department (see their Prius and the Lexus Rx400h) I wouldn't put it past them. They have the right combination of good management, solid financials, and technical know how that this shouldn't seem far fetched to anyone. (They also have a fair amount of experience working with Denso, as that's the company that they work with on the hybrids.)

    --
    DBA? Software Engineer? My company is hiring! Click
    1. Re:Given Their Abilities With Cars... by hey! · · Score: 1

      Hard to say.

      I one saw a presentation by an Japanese engineer who was talking about the applications of fuzzy logic. He was practically waxing ecstatic over how a washing machine with fuzzy logic controller could swish the water just so, as a opposed to an ordinary washing machine, which stupidly just swishes at one of several predefined speed/amplitude settings. The implication is that up till today, washing machines have treated people's clothing with shameful insensitivity, and that a new era was dawning in which they would treat their master's underwear with proper respect.

      I don't think Japanese engineers are better than American ones, but Japanese companies may have a competitive advantage in that they are perhaps more culturally attuned to how small details create an overall client experience with a product. You can see it in their car instrument panels, which manage to be thoughtful without being gimmicky. If the barriers to the robot butler are primarily technological, I'd say Americans might beat them to it. If the barrier is building a robot that will fit in with what the cultural expectations of how a domestic robot should do it's duties, then the Japanese will almost surely get there first.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Given Their Abilities With Cars... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      If the barrier is building a robot that will fit in with what the cultural expectations of how a domestic robot should do it's duties, then the Japanese will almost surely get there first.


      Roomba is a domestic robot. It's already here and it's American. Where is the Japanese domestic robot?
      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. iRobot huh? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    I already wanted to buy hard-cover copies of I, Robot to throw at Will Smith when the movie went out, to avenge Azimov's memory, but really, that pink roomba thing is too much. Poor Isaac must be spinning in his grave...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:iRobot huh? by hayh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Asimov himself actually admits to having stolen the title "I, Robot" from a previously published sci-fi story. So whoever *originally* used it is rolling over in his/her grave.

    2. Re:iRobot huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could avenge Asimov's memory by simply spelling his name correctly.

  24. In other news... by taskforce · · Score: 0
    ...A Honda spokesperson said they expected flying cars to follow shortly after. They promised heavy device integration between the two products, possibly hinting that the robots would be able to drive the said flying cars.

    Bill Gates was heard to comment that he hoped the open source community would rise to the challenge of writing open Operating Systems for both the cars and robots.

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    1. Re:In other news... by xMilkmanDanx · · Score: 0

      Informative?? Here's a tip kids, don't mod when you're smoking hash. The things that make you go "wow" then, aren't necessarily informative. funny parent btw

  25. I, Robot by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    We're already here. Aren't you?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  26. I'll believe it when I see it by MichaelGospatric · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Personally I aim to start selling nuclear fusion plants by 2010. Which of course will accomodate growing demand for clean, efficient supplies of power.

    I could have sworn I saw this exact same article five years ago, aiming for a target of 2000 as the first year for mass-market helper robots.

    1. Re:I'll believe it when I see it by Adrilla · · Score: 1

      Simple math would've told you that they picked a bad projected date. They would've had at most, less than 12 months to get the robots out. Not a good timetable when you're dealing with a project of this magnitude.

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  27. Roomba by ericschoon · · Score: 1

    The The roomba is a great robot. It does well as a vacuum cleaner too. Not much of a time saver if you follow it around the whole time attempting to derive its inner workings and movement patters. But of course I wouldn't do that.

    Can't wait until there are more functional robots out there. Then I can save time by watching them do menial tasks for me.

    --
    --
  28. Obligatory SNL Reference by vishbar · · Score: 1

    Did you hear? Robots eat old people's medicine for fuel!

    There is an alternative: Liberty Robot Insurance. It protects against any and all robot attacks.

    Thank God for Liberty Robot Insurance. Thank God for Sam Waterston.

    --
    Ride the skies
    1. Re:Obligatory SNL Reference by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      And Grandma is so thankful that their robot is eating all Grandpa's Viagra. But now the Robots blind.

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
  29. You've been warned... by goldspider · · Score: 1

    ...yet scientists keep building the damned things! Are you prepared for the inevitable?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  30. ... a little strange ... by ninjagin · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think it's a very ambitious goal. The physical attributes of a humanoid robot have been developing quite rapidly... stuff like running, walking, arm & hand movement, etc. On the other hand, the AI and machine vision components would seem to be developing less slowly, and these are precisely the things that one would consider important for adoption in the target markets.

    I confess that I don't have much deep knowledge of advancements in AI and machine vision. Anytime we've had robot articles posted on slashdot lately they've been about advancements in the physical attributes of humanoid robots. Perhaps someone out there can fill me in on what I've been missing.

    Anyhow, on a lighter note, as I was reading the "trends" article, I could not help noticing this paragraph:

    The statement goes on to say that Toyota will make partner robots that "have human characteristics, such as being agile, warm and kind and also intelligent enough to skillfully operate a variety of devices in the area of personal assistance, care for the elderly, manufacturing and mobility." The statement continues, "since each area requires a special set of skills, Toyota is promoting the development of three different types of partner robots - walking, rolling and mountable - each with its own areas of expertise."

    WARNING: BAD JOKE AHEAD

    I like "agile, warm and kind", and the article stressed the advancements in the lips on certain robots such that they can play the trumpet, but if it's going to be "mountable", shouldn't there be some work on robots that are "moist" in addition to being "agile, warm and kind"? I mean, can you imagine the chafing?

    IT WAS A BAD JOKE, BUT YOU -=WERE=- WARNED, AFTER ALL

    --
    .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  31. Imagine the tech support calls... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Toyota Eldery Care Technology support, how can I help you?"

    "I've fallen, and I can't get up."

    "Is your ElderCare 5000 series nearby?"

    "I forgot to recharge Willy last night."

    "Willy? Who is Willy?"

    "Well -- that's my robot's name. After my first husband, before he died in the Vietnam War. He was such a loveable man...kind to his children...and..."

    "Uh -- ma'am -- does 'Willy' have a base charge?"

    "What? I can't hear ya real good. Willy has my Miracle Ear stored in his chest compartment."

    "I SAID -- DOES 'WILLY' HAVE A BASE CHARGE?"

    "Base charge? What's that? I only know the green lights and the one with the blinking red light."

    "Can you reach Willy from where you're lying?"

    "Can I touch my willy so you can spy on me? You whippersnapper pervert! I'll have you fired! How digusting..."

    "Ma'am -- please hold."

    [technician initiates kill mode on ElderCare 5000 via GPS and remote activation protocols]

    "Ma'am -- are you still there?"

    "Yes -- Willy is moving around now. What did you do?"

    "It'll all be over soon."

    "What? A tall rover's moon? Hey! Willy?! What are you doin'? Willy?! Put that TV down! He's gone amock! What's going on?! Willy?! WILLY?!"

    [slam - click - dial-tone - ring]

    "Toyota Eldery Care Technology support, how can I help you?"

    IronChefMorimoto

  32. Imagine a future by oskard · · Score: 1

    Where robots of all shapes and sizes approach you asking one universal question. "How may I service you?" Too bad these robots aren't hot chicks!

    --
    Sigs are for Terrorists.
    1. Re:Imagine a future by wed128 · · Score: 1

      yet, man. yet.

  33. boost to the robots industry by unk1911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nothing would give a greater boost to the robot industry than a RoboGirl...

    --
    http://unk1911.blogspot.com/

    1. Re:boost to the robots industry by geekoid · · Score: 1

      you mean this.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:boost to the robots industry by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      Of course it would all but crash humanity. Think about it, if you could just buy a robot chick and do whatever you pleased to her, no one in there right mind would deal with all the shit a relationship entails. People would forget to mate for procreation, and an increasingly top heavy population would eventually bring about a new dark age.

    3. Re:boost to the robots industry by oni · · Score: 1

      spoken like a true virgin.

      There's no substitute for a real woman

    4. Re:boost to the robots industry by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      Wrong on both counts.
      How can you make that statement? Have you ever boned a robot? What else have you had sex with in order to make the statement that there is no substitute for a real women? Until we see the finished product, I'll reserve judgement

    5. Re:boost to the robots industry by pizen · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to download my Lucy Lu-bot from Nappster. Wonder if I have any Mac-formatted blank robots around.

    6. Re:boost to the robots industry by unk1911 · · Score: 1

      maybe that is our destiny.. the victory of the machine over human-kind..

      --
      http://unk1911.blogspot.com/

  34. looking after the elderly? by binarstu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We already have a culture that puts the elderly away into nursing homes or retirement communities rather than having families take care of them. This is in sharp contrast to the way elderly members of most cultures have traditionally been cared for. A few generations back in the U.S., most elderly lived with their families as they aged.

    Now we're in the process of developing technology so that we won't even need to use precious human labor in taking care of the aged among us. This sounds like a sad development to me.

    1. Re:looking after the elderly? by erlenic · · Score: 1

      Remember though, a few generations back the elderly didn't last as long as they do now. Back then it was easy to take Grandma in for a year or two, but now it's more like 20-30 years. We will probably still be shoving them away in homes or with robots for a few generations until our culture adjusts. Hopefully we'll return to caring for them ourselves after that adjustment.

    2. Re:looking after the elderly? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      thats not true. the upper end of the average age has changed very little in the last 100 years. The primary reason the 'average age' has gone up is because of the decrease in infant mortality.

      It seems to me that the elderly are more capable then ever, so would require less care then they did 100 years ago.

      I good robot advance would be one that allowed the elderly to lead a normal life.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:looking after the elderly? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It's more complicated to that. In those societies where the elderly are cared for at home, generally they also have many children to do the taking care of. In the US, we have decided that it is better to accumulate wealth by having few children.(fewer than 2 per woman on average) Combined with the increasing lifespan, this results in more elderly per person to take care of. The amount of care required, especially with advancing age, essencially mandates that an economy of scale be sought - nursing homes and retirement comunities - or the economy as a whole would be injured.

      Since having fewer children results in a greater burden on those children (in care and SSI) and is generally done to maintain greater wealth for the parents (or non-childrearing couple), it could be argued that the "baby-boomer" generation is the most selfish generation yet (in the short term) and therefore does not deserve the benefits we have decreed for their parents (who won the greatest war yet in the history of modern civilization)

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:looking after the elderly? by patio11 · · Score: 2
      Well, look at the mathematics. The Japanese population is aging rapidly, their birth rate is plummeting, and by 2050 there are going to be, what, two people of working age for every retiree. You can't afford to devote 50% of your work force to home helping. Wouldn't you rather most of these folks be given the independence to live at home with a bit of a robo-boost rather than be housed in a labor-conserving institutional setting which resembles nothing so much as a factory farm minus the chickenwire?

      Signed, The Guy Who Writes Their Vision Algorithms

      P.S. Solution #2 is, of course, immigration. Thats a bit of a political hot potato over here, but its getting less so as people see the handwriting on the wall -- ten years ago no way in heck they would have let a foreigner into this job.

      P.P.S. Solution #3, raising the birthrate, is another hot potato. I'll spare you the obvious joke. Anyhow, the government is working on it, including some places which are actually paying people to have kids.

    5. Re:looking after the elderly? by xiaix · · Score: 1

      You are clearly forgetting solution #4 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0070723/ and #5 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0074812/

      --

      Have you read the Moderator Guidelines yet?

    6. Re:looking after the elderly? by Zorgoth · · Score: 1

      This is not just the US...remember the heat wave in France last year...when all the elderly died while their decentents froliced on the beaches?

      --
      -------------------------------END--COMMUNICATION- --------------------------
  35. As long as they don't by joncue · · Score: 3, Funny

    Make one that will open a jar, my wife will keep me around....

    1. Re:As long as they don't by xv4n · · Score: 1

      ...hmmm... just to let you know, there is a jar-opener robot, but we'll keep the secret ;-)

    2. Re:As long as they don't by joncue · · Score: 1

      uh oh, my days are numbered

  36. Woomba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one disturbed by the idea of a pink Roomba after seeing SNL's Woomba commercial?

  37. Robot, Heal Thyself by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    If Toyota is going to sell robots, I want one that fixes my car. Why should I pay for labor that eventually exceeds the car's purchase price? Why should I spend weekends waiting for for a mechanic to "rest"? Why should I even have to go to a garage, even my own, when my mechanic could ride in the trunk, and race under its own power to get a part when I'm disabled roadside? If they pull this off, I should be able to replace all those mysterious red dashboard lights and weird pings with a mechanical mechanic.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Robot, Heal Thyself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but given how often Toyota cars break down, you'll chiefly need the Toyota robot to fix your American cars.

  38. America leads in killer robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    We're way ahead in killer robots. From the Predator drone with the Hellfire missile to the DARPA Grand Challenge, America's leadership in killing machines is unchallenged.

    So there.

    We will grease the treads of our robots with the bodies of their infidel children! The Arab street will run red with blood as American's invincible armies of killer robots crush the life out of tomorrow's terrorists! God Bless America and President George W. Bush!

  39. Re:We know what the japanese mean by "service" by JPelorat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Two words.

    Built-in vibrator.

    I mean, who *wouldn't* want an iHump?

    --
    Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
  40. Sounds promising by glen · · Score: 1

    From the robotics trends link...

    In a manner similar to humans, the 77 pound as yet unnamed robot has artificial lips which can alter their position subtly....

  41. Re:Old People, Japan, and Immigrants by vertinox · · Score: 1

    While in the US there is not shortage of lowskilled/low paid workers since they can just import them...

    Japan has very strict immigration laws and the fact that is an Island makes it a bit harder to immigrate to.

    From what I understand to become a Japanese citizen you either need to have a family member put your name in the town registry (strange old tradition and in fact being born in Japan doesn't count as being a citizen. You have to hae a pre-existing member in the town registry register you or something) or get married to a Japanese citizen or somehow make it through the extremely rough immigration process in which you get to live there but not be a citizen.

    Seeing that in 10 years there will be more old people than young in Japan they will need some way to replace the labor shortarge, robots would be an optimal solution.

    That and they can finally build that giant robot they've always wanted to take over the US with.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  42. but, won't this... by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

    put illegal immigrants out of work?

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
  43. Someone has to say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, welcome our new service robot overlords.

  44. Bring on the mecha! by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    I am seriously impressed by what they've done with bipedal robotics and can see that we may end up with having walking armored robots in the future. Very cool.

    Personally, I just want something for personal use that fits one or maybe two in a cockpit, runs like an ostrich, but with the commensurately higher overland speed of something twenty feet tall. Now that would make traffic jams a thing of the past.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  45. Re:Old People, Japan, and Immigrants by Cryofan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yeah, I actually know all about it. I've actually BEEN to Japan. See, I am an educated person, as opposed to all these blockheads who read Ayn Rand and the Wall St Journal, and thus believe they have received access to the Hidden Wisdom of the Ages.....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  46. Hey, R2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That rear strut has come loose again, see if you can lock it down!

  47. Congratulations... by Gruneun · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You managed to take an article from a London-based news agency, written in Tokyo, based on an outrageous claim from a Japanese company and referencing only other Japanese companies... and use it to bash the US.

    This place is getting more and more pathetic by the hour.

    1. Re:Congratulations... by steve_bryan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You managed to take an article from a London-based news agency, written in Tokyo, based on an outrageous claim from a Japanese company and referencing only other Japanese companies... and use it to bash the US.

      Yep, that was my take on the posting as well. However, although I think he meant to bash the US I think his aim was off. The Roomba, besides being a real product and not just hot air, happens to have first rate design and software. An example of a useful product and not just fanboy technology for its own sake. For instance, consider AIBO. It may be a cool toy but damn it is expensive.

  48. I for one by slummy · · Score: 0

    will welcome our new robot overlords.

  49. mutilingual by willCode4Beer.com · · Score: 1

    with the new google translator, they'll be able to serve your foreign visitors too.

    --
    ----- If communism is a system where the government owns business, what do you call a system where business owns govern
  50. Friends for evar? by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "Service Robots in Service"

    Thesaurus meet Cmd Taco. Taco this is Thesaurus...

  51. Robot Insurance by thomsenb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Time to start up my robot insurance business. ...cause robots are strong, and they like to eat old people's medicine

  52. Bubblegum Crisis anyone? by dep01 · · Score: 1

    The age of the boomers begins in 2010. :)

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
    1. Re:Bubblegum Crisis anyone? by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      The boomers are a possibility by that insanely tall tower? Not in a long shot...

      --
      Error: No error occurred
  53. Whoever believes that Roomba is the best... by katcoker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hasn't seen RoboCleaner. It is by far more expensive, but I believe it is a superior product. Roomba can now recharge itself (the more advanced models anyway), however the RC 3000 can also empty it's load. http://www.karcher.com/RoboCleaner/robo/english/en glish.html

    --
    Max: "You mind if I drive?" Sam: "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the dash and screeching like a cheerleader."
    1. Re:Whoever believes that Roomba is the best... by technoextreme · · Score: 1

      I recently watched Joseph Engelberger give a speech about why there were no service robots all ready. He said that we have all the technologies we need to build a service robot. Another point he made was that the robot has to balance both cost and usefulness. Robotic vacuums with these fancy features have always been around in some form or another. It's just always been too expensive for anyone to justify buying these devices. Roomba changed that trend because it was cheap enough for people to buy even as a gift. Engelberger also believed that the Japense are wasting their time building bipedal robots. Wheeled robots can use the elevator instead of climbing up stairs. He was a fascinating person and is one of the main reasons why we are talking about Toyota's new service robots. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_F._Engelberger

      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  54. In the basement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought that nowadays all the elderly were cared for by the slashdotters in their basements...

    Yeah, I'll be there in a second, Mom. Keep your depends on.

  55. Illegal Aliens by ndansmith · · Score: 1
    Corporations go for the low-hanging fruit. Therefore, I doubt we will see any real funding for really useful robots so long as 3rd world "neoslaves"...oops! I mean "illegal aliens"....oops! I mean "undocumented workers" are allowed to move to the USA as cheap and desperate scab labor to fatten the wallets of investors and business owners and management.

    Many illegal aliens are paid minimum wage for their jobs. I remember a recent NPR interview where a farmer in the desert Southwest had no choice but to hire illegal immigrants to pick the crops; Americans would not apply for the job.

    Plus we are in a global economy now. If you wont do the work, don't blame the "desperate scab labor" or the "investors and business owners and managment" for taking away jobs.

    Supply and demand still apply. If the cheepest, most efficient means of labor is robots, then robots will be "employed."

    1. Re:Illegal Aliens by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I remember a recent NPR interview where a farmer in the desert Southwest had no choice but to hire illegal immigrants to pick the crops; Americans would not apply for the job.

      That's what we call an excuse, and it's total bullshit.

      If legal workers won't apply for the jobs, that is a sign that he needs to raise the pay, not break the law. Supply and demand works both ways.

      Holy fuck. Could you imagine if I stole something from a store and said "No one would offer to sell it to me at $0.01! I had no choice but to steal it!" Ridiculous.

    2. Re:Illegal Aliens by ndansmith · · Score: 1
      Yes, but in this case, there are consequences to not "buying something from a store." If illegal laborers are not hired, the harvest does not get picked or prices go up. Aliens pick a large portion of crops, especially in the Southern U.S. That means that if all laws were enforced, the producers would have to significantly raise prices in order to pay higher wages to American workers, making their product less competitive on the global market.

      Also, I don't think that paying fair-wages to illegal immigrants can be rightly called "stealing." That sort of thinking will not float in the global economy.

    3. Re:Illegal Aliens by Politburo · · Score: 1

      If illegal laborers are not hired, the harvest does not get picked or prices go up. Aliens pick a large portion of crops, especially in the Southern U.S. That means that if all laws were enforced, the producers would have to significantly raise prices in order to pay higher wages to American workers, making their product less competitive on the global market.

      Too fucking bad, imo. Yes, I realize the consequences of this. It's way past time for a serious shift in the way we view and use labor in this country. Our current system is slowly destroying us.

    4. Re:Illegal Aliens by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

      Farmer for whatever reason decides to not pay wages that people want (instead, magnaminously picking an arbitrarily higher wage).

      Farmer has higher costs. Farmer has to raise prices. Farmer's higher prices can't compete. Farmer doesn't sell product. Farmer goes out of business. Now there are no jobs.

      a,b,c,d....

    5. Re:Illegal Aliens by Cryofan · · Score: 1


      Farmer for whatever reason decides to not pay wages that people want (instead, magnaminously picking an arbitrarily higher wage).
      Farmer has higher costs. Farmer has to raise prices. Farmer's higher prices can't compete. Farmer doesn't sell product. Farmer goes out of business. Now there are no jobs.
      a,b,c,d....


      Please please tell me you are not THAT stupid!

      Let's take this apart:

      a--Farmer for whatever reason decides to not pay wages that people want (instead, magnaminously picking an arbitrarily higher wage).


      What fucking color is the sky in your neoliberal, libertarian, AynRand-masturbatory fantasy world? In REAL LIFE, it would go down like this: the pickers say FUCK YOU, Old MacDonald, give me a raise or we walk.

      b--And so the farmer pays this. Farmer has higher costs.


      Correct!


      c--Farmer has to raise prices.


      Correct, OR he can eat the wage increase by paying his investors/shareholders less money, because as we all know, the VAST majority of produce comes from corporate agriculture. Either that, or the farmer is a millionaire (quite common), and so he will buy a new car next year instead of this year.



      d-Farmer's higher prices can't compete.


      WRONG! The pickers for the OTHER farmer/mega-corp-agro ALSO wanted a raise. And if they did not, then they will quit their current jobs, and go work for the higher wage. ALL The other farmers will have to raise their wages and price,too. It's called a race to the top, bright eyes. And this time, instead of putting the price pressure on the earners to eat a wage decrease, the price pressure is put on the owners to eat the wage increase.

      e--Farmer doesn't sell product.
      Farmer goes out of business. Now there are no jobs.


      BULLSHIT. As long as people need to eat, there will be a demand for food. And where there is a demand, there will be a supply. See, when you read the wall st journal, Ayn Rand, listen to Limbaugh, that turns your brain to mush, as any reasonably intelligent onlooker can see. Now wipe your blood off of your nose, and go do some real reading.

      --
      eat shiat and bark at the moon
    6. Re:Illegal Aliens by Politburo · · Score: 1

      I think Cryofan sufficiently ripped apart your post. I wouldn't have been quite as in your face about it, but my response would have been along the same general lines.

      Furthermore, I believe you misrepresent my post..

      Farmer for whatever reason decides to not pay wages that people want (instead, magnaminously picking an arbitrarily higher wage).

      The reason the farmer is paying higher wages in this situation is because no one will work for the lower wage. Supply and demand works both ways.

    7. Re:Illegal Aliens by ndansmith · · Score: 1
      Yes, I realize the consequences of this. It's way past time for a serious shift in the way we view and use labor in this country. Our current system is slowly destroying us.

      I agree, and I can suggest a first step: Since we are in a global economy, we should stop this "us v. them" mentality. We should stop attacking those "illegal immigrants" who take "our jobs."

    8. Re:Illegal Aliens by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I am about to respond to Cryofan, so you can read that if you're interested :)

      but in the meanwhile, I am, as you can tell from my post, very libertarian leaning, and as such I am against black markets and for freedom in all things--including freedom of movement of peoples.

      It's completely not fair to say that no one but illegals will work for minimum wage or what not, that's certainly not true in my home state. People WILL work for minimum wage--yes, they may be poor immigrants, but there are no shortage of those, even legal ones.

    9. Re:Illegal Aliens by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      a--Farmer for whatever reason decides to not pay wages that people want (instead, magnaminously picking an arbitrarily higher wage).

      What fucking color is the sky in your neoliberal, libertarian, AynRand-masturbatory fantasy world? In REAL LIFE, it would go down like this: the pickers say FUCK YOU, Old MacDonald, give me a raise or we walk.



      So what non-"REAL LIFE" do we life in? A magical candy land where people don't conform to your specific vision of how they should act? And incidentally, your usage of the word neo-liberal is completely backwards--it's CLASSICAL liberal.



      Correct, OR he can eat the wage increase by paying his investors/shareholders less money, because as we all know, the VAST majority of produce comes from corporate agriculture. Either that, or the farmer is a millionaire (quite common), and so he will buy a new car next year instead of this year.



      Yes this is true, he COULD eat more of the costs. How much more, I'd have to see numbers on. You do realize there are heavy farming subsidies throughout the country? Well anyway, my point stands--when profits are reduced, so are funding, so is the ability to expand, so are your hated corporate profits, leaving other farmers looking better to investors, etc.



      WRONG! The pickers for the OTHER farmer/mega-corp-agro ALSO wanted a raise. And if they did not, then they will quit their current jobs, and go work for the higher wage. ALL The other farmers will have to raise their wages and price,too. It's called a race to the top, bright eyes. And this time, instead of putting the price pressure on the earners to eat a wage decrease, the price pressure is put on the owners to eat the wage increase.



      Ok, so why doesn't this happen? Simple, because there is a huge number of people who WILL work for what you call the "lower wages." I'm not even talking about "illegals." Just because people are immigrants doesn't mean they are illegals. And just because they will (gladly, I might add) work for a wage someone such as yourself wouldn't deign to, doesn't make them bad people.

      BULLSHIT. As long as people need to eat, there will be a demand for food. And where there is a demand, there will be a supply. See, when you read the wall st journal, Ayn Rand, listen to Limbaugh, that turns your brain to mush, as any reasonably intelligent onlooker can see. Now wipe your blood off of your nose, and go do some real reading.



      I don't understand your point here, other than a lot of ad hominems. No one farmer is going to substantially alter the world food supply. You may not realize it per se, but we're part of a vast economy of farmers across the states, across the nation, across north america, across the hemisphere, and across the globe. One farmer in this scene means very little. If he can't compete, nobody cares, there are millions of other farmers doing the same thing he's doing.

      I should also note that in your ideal world, you make food goods more expensive for EVERYONE, thus in large part eliminating any advantage the farm workers would get from an increased wage. You've just raised food costs for the poor...that doesn't seem very fair.

    10. Re:Illegal Aliens by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Well I think we've gotten too far from the original post: "I remember a recent NPR interview where a farmer in the desert Southwest had no choice but to hire illegal immigrants to pick the crops; Americans would not apply for the job."

      The original situation didn't have anything to do with minimum wage. In fact, as you can see, the wage is not even referenced. My assumption was that legal workers would not take the job due to wage, which may not be correct. However, no where did I say that only illegals work for minimum wage, or anything of the sort.

      My point is that "no one will apply for the job" is not an excuse for hiring illegal workers. If you can't get workers, change the conditions of employment, don't break the law. It just so happens that "change the conditions of employment" almost always means raising the pay.

    11. Re:Illegal Aliens by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Well ok, I'll agree with that then :)

      but, with the stipulation that the laws are stupid ;)

  56. Roomba the Most Advanced? Please... by Matrix5353 · · Score: 1

    The Trilobite by Electrolux is a much smarter machine. The Roomba works by guesswork. It uses probability to make sure that it'll cover most of the floor at least once during its random turns. The Trilobite uses Sonar and mapping software, so it *knows* where it is. If it doesn't finish the whole floor, it'll return back to the base station, charge, and then finish the remainder of the floor, saving time and power. Here's a link to the product page http://www.electroluxusa.com/node142.asp and here's a nice article explaining how the Trilobite is so much more advanced http://www.i4u.com/article1634.html

  57. Capitalism, jobs, and the machine... by sterno · · Score: 1

    Certainly the question of their capability is important, but I think that will be solved over time. Certainly the intelligence put into the Roomba is pretty primitive, but over time, as we understand more about artificial intelligence, more complex robots would be possible.

    But here's an important question that's often avoided: should we do this even if it's possible? I mean, what do health care and day care workers do if a robot becomes capable of replacing them. We've already seen the impact of cheap labor through overseas manufacturing and automation on blue collar jobs. What happens as the robotics gets more sophisticated and is capable of replacing higher skilled inviduals.

    A thought I've always had is this: what would happen in a capitalist system where there was no job for humans? Capitalism is entirely based on the notion of people earning money by productive input into the economy. But if all production could be handled by automated systems, how could people earn money?

    It's unrealistic that all human labor will ever be replaced, but if the human population increases expontentially, and the demand for human labor decreases, there is an obvious problem that we run into. How does one earn a living in that economy if you're job is one that can be automated?

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  58. TROJAN!!!! by milktoastman · · Score: 0

    HA! Good thing I had anti-virus software on! Don't go to this guy's link. There is a trojan!

    1. Re:TROJAN!!!! by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      Or, should I say, your AV software sucks so bad that it wrongly detects a perfectly legit AlbinoBlackSheep link as a trojan?

    2. Re:TROJAN!!!! by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, it does me the service of telling me when annoying windows will pop up to advertise a bunch of bullshit and kills it along with any other shoddy code. And, if it wasn't overly cautious, I'd accuse my AV software of a lack of vigilance and assume it was part of a plot on behalf of my anti-virus software to stage a fascist coup and take over my computer.

    3. Re:TROJAN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Albinoblacksheep is a very well written site. Even has some great tutorials. The site is code verified in XHTML, XML, HTTP and more. sooo before you go bashing something you dont know anything about. Perhaps you should actually do some research.

      Just a fan of ABS, really great site, i dont believe there are pop ups. But if you have either firefox or the new version of IE with pop up blocker, then theres naught to worry about eh?

    4. Re:TROJAN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . The site is code verified in XHTML, XML, HTTP and more.

      Code verified? In HTTP, no less?

    5. Re:TROJAN!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The site is code verified in XHTML
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww .albinoblacksheep.com%2Fflash%2Fsecretofspace.html

      There are 7 errors in the page. This page is NOT valid xhtml 1.0 transitional.

      That being said, 7 errors is pretty low. Slashdot by comparison returns several hundred -- well, it did, until the w3c was net block banned... wtg taco, ban the w3c so no-one can tell how sloppy slashcode produces invalid html.

      7 errors is really good, but microsoft, ibm, and the w3c can all produce valid html. then again sites like tom's hardware can return thousands and thousands of errors...

      in terms of open source OSes, FreeBSD's page is valid xhtml 1.0 transitional, and debian.org is valid html 4.01 transitional, but slackware.org returns 69 4.01 errors.

      Goatse reurned 7 errors, while tubgirl only returned 3.

  59. Running Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fear the robot will be hard to get out its bedroom and will consume vast amounts of Cheetos if it does.

  60. OTOH by geekoid · · Score: 1

    if you could get a robot as part of your community, you could all buy in. Now you have a robot that just mows everyones lawn.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  61. Old Glory by protolith · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Sam Waterson: I'm Sam Waterston, of the popular TV series "Law & Order". As a senior citizen, you're probably aware of the threat robots pose. Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel. Well, now there's a company that offers coverage against the unfortunate event of robot attack, with Old Glory Insurance. Old Glory will cover you with no health check-up or age consideration. [ SUPER: Limitied Benefits First Two Years ] You need to feel safe. And that's harder and harder to do nowadays, because robots may strike at any time."

    1. Re:Old Glory by God+of+Lemmings · · Score: 3, Funny

      WARNING! people denying the existence of robots may be robots themselves!

      --
      Non sequitur: Your facts are uncoordinated.
  62. First thought was.... by AlltheCoolNamesGone · · Score: 1

    robots that would work on your car. Then woundering if they would get paid $18.00 an hour, which would be added to my bill as "labor"....

    --
    M$ it's whats for diner!!!!!
  63. I beleive I speak for everyone when i ask... by Gavin86 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    ...Do you have Robot Insurance?
    Because robots eat old people's medicine for food. And robots are strong.

    --
    "Progress comes from the intelligent use of experience."
  64. Roomba is nice, but... by cahiha · · Score: 1

    Roomba is a nice little vacuum cleaner, and not too expensive. But it is not the technically most advanced household robot. Roomba operates roughly like a pool cleaner, moving around in some (probably carefully tuned) random patterns.

    You can actually get vacuum cleaner robots with a lot more, and more advanced, technology: sensors, cameras, indoor room mapping, WiFi, etc.

    1. Re:Roomba is nice, but... by Yaotzin · · Score: 1
      You can actually get vacuum cleaner robots with a lot more, and more advanced, technology: sensors, cameras, indoor room mapping, WiFi, etc.
      Yes! Finally I can watch porn on my vacuum cleaner!


      Note: Meant as a joke
      --
      Error: No error occurred
    2. Re:Roomba is nice, but... by cahiha · · Score: 1

      Actually, it lets you drive the vacuum cleaner around your home and control it from a web page anywhere in the world; it's weird, but together with the built-in camera, it lets you check in on your home pretty nicely.

      If your vacuum cleaner finds your wife having sex in the bedroom with the UPS man, I suppose that may qualify as porn.

  65. And so it begins... by Tolkien · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thus appear the first signs of Isaac Asimov's "I, Robot" (made into a movie starring Will Smith).

    It's only a matter of time until the 3 laws robots must follow need to be implemented into their AI, and then they will evolve as predicted, and we're doomed.

    There's a reason so many science-fiction books have become non-fiction, anything a human can imagine, will eventually happen, through the laws of probability and advancements in technology.

    If human ego or greed doesn't deplete/destroy the planet, what happened in "I, Robots" will happen to us.

    Prime example: I forgot what the book was, but when Dolly the sheep was first cloned, there was a whole horde of books written years or even decades earlier (maybe even more in some cases), dealing with Cloning, that have since been recategorized into non-fiction.

    1. Re:And so it begins... by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      oops a few grammar mistakes in there, but you get the idea...

  66. Military Uses by compuguy84 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...joints in the right hand.... Sounds like these things could handle a firearm. "There is no spoon."

    1. Re:Military Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even on a Grenade?

  67. "Service", hmmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Just what kind of "service" are we talking about? Some kinds of "service" will be more popular than others.

  68. It's a robot, and it cleans my business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my lady business

  69. Ricer Robot Turbo 3000 by gelfling · · Score: 1

    I won't believe it till I see some biomechanically-genetically enhanced NBA baller on Cribs with a Bot that is supposed to serve Crytall but playa never figured out how to power it up so it sits in the corner with a hat on sideways.

  70. Damn It! by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    The Japanese KNOW what I want in a robot! They've had TV shows about them for years! I don't want a goddamn kinder, gentler robot! I want a heavily armed robot that can easily destroy the SUV in front of me that has to slow down to 5 miles an hour to take a right turn! Why won't the Japanese build the robot I want?!

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    1. Re:Damn It! by technoextreme · · Score: 1

      Psssttt.... The United States is the country you want. We are mainly fixated with the automating our army and a lot of the new technologies from the U.S. are military.

      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  71. In Japan Robots Are only For OLD PEOPLE by protolith · · Score: 1

    I'm sure there is room for some other joke about a beowolf cluster of these in Soviet Russia, but it escapes me.

  72. Hedonismbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helper robots are only good at making their human masters look lazy. A hedonismbot, on the other hand, would make even the laziest homosapian look industrious.

  73. I've been waiting for this... by kerrbear · · Score: 1

    ... because I'm going to need a service robot in 2010 to fix my flying car!

  74. Robot Nation by TheKubrix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For the tin foil hat crowd, heres an interesting essay about robots taking over,...and how it starts with general services:

    http://marshallbrain.com/robotic-nation.htm

    1. Re:Robot Nation by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1
      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  75. Technological Poseurs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Until major breakthroughs happen in AI, robots like these are just toys and no more useful than the gimmicky ASIMO. Personally I think the first major advance will be in natural language processing and help us better corral all the documents out there in cyberspace; intelligent (i.e. useful) robots will probably happen much later. Sad to see the Japanese keep wasting resources on creating simulacra of their anime cartoons instead of doing useful research and development.

  76. Any word about the 3 laws by masterpenguin · · Score: 1

    think there's any chance of Isaac Asimov's "Three Laws of Robotics" being used in the firmware programming of robots?

    1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.

    2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.

    3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

    1. Re:Any word about the 3 laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your regular household robot, yes. To what extent modern robots understand these concepts anyway. Say there was an emergency and the robot had to be instructed to fetch a mobile phone from across the room. In between there is someone lying on the ground. Assuming the robot can recognize a human lying on the floor, it should refuse to stomp over that human. There is a risk that the robot would cause harm to that person. Now, there would have to be an override, the owner of the robot is the one who makes the decision of that, by saying for example: "I know it's a human, but this is an emergency", and the robot would proceed.
      I guess what I'm getting to is: today's AI is pretty much about 0 or 1. Harming a human being is a relative concept and there's just no way to put in code to make the robot evaluate if the override in the previous example is in harmony with "laws of robotics".

    2. Re:Any word about the 3 laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not a chance in hell.

      Those laws require so much understanding of what is human, any robot with them would be stalled just trying to understand what is "human" and how it might hurt the "human". Firmware code, this aint!

  77. Pink robots have feelings too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't be so mean to the pink roombas, you big meanie!

  78. I for one, welcome our new robotic overlords by SageMadHatter · · Score: 1

    Someone had to say it.

  79. Roomba is not a robot... by hey! · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is an application of robotics technology to a household problem. It's a smart appliance.

    OK, technically, it is a robot, but it falls far short of what people are thinking when the speak of a domestic robot. It partially fulfills the expectation that the robot will have autonomous mobility, but it lacks the flexible programming and multi-purpose appendages that would make it suitable to a wide variety of tasks. On a scale that starts with the fuzzy logic washing machine and goes up to the first generation robots of the Asimov story, it may be an important historical landmark, but it is still nearly indistinguishable from the washing machine.

    Of course, what people think of when they talk about domestic robots may be a solution in search of a problem. Maybe your house becomes the robot, and the Roomba type devices become its appendages. But it's challenging, becuase it's probably not just a matter of networking all your devices to a central controller. Look at how hard it is to come up with a car instrument panel that is simple and convenient to use, and I think it's obvious that the smart house is an order of magnitude harder.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  80. It's about time! by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    I've heard this promise every year since 1974. And I've believed it every time. Now, I'm off to the Moonbase on my personal jetpack. -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:It's about time! by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      I've heard this promise every year since 1974. And I've believed it every time. Now, I'm off to the Moonbase on my personal jetpack. -Eric

      Well, we are extending the Monorail in Seattle, which was promised about the same time as jetpacks, so maybe by 2050 we'll have service robots in mass quantities ...

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  81. Obligatory Futurama Quotes by ari_j · · Score: 1

    Fry: ...Then when I feel so stuffed I can't eat anymore, I just use the restroom, and then I can eat more.

    LiuBot: You should write a book, Fry. People need to know about the- CAN EAT MORE.



    Fry: You're cute!

    LiuBot: You're cute!

    Fry: You!

    LiuBot: You!

    Fry: You!

    (This goes on for a while)

    Farnsworth: Oh, dear! She's stuck in an infinite loop, and he's an idiot. Well, that's love for you.

  82. Now available in pink? by DroopyStonx · · Score: 1

    Good thing we have the technology to get them in pink.

    I was worried about the advancement of these robots for a while.. but then I heard about pink.

    Thank fucking god.

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  83. Breathalizer by bkruiser · · Score: 1

    Too many uses for this new robot around the house. Who needs liquid air anymore!

  84. I hope you got a fire extinguisher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it could burst into flames at any moment

  85. Hey, by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    If you need a flying car to get to the jetpack gas station, hertz is renting them for $59 a day.

  86. Will they be Fusion Powered? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    That's supposed to happen in 2010 too, just like it was supposed to happen in 2000, 1990, 1980, and before that 1970 I think (but I was a baby in 60, so I don't know that one for sure).

    I'll believe it when:

    a. They work;
    b. They keep working;
    c. They perform as promised;
    d. They are mass produced in sufficient quality;
    e. They can be repaired and maintained when Stuff Happens - which it always does.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  87. Re:Toyota? You're lucky! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Roomba rear-ended my Ford Crown Victoria crime fighting robot, which then burst into flames.

    Ford: bringing you new ways to explode. And you thought Microsoft was bad!

    OT, let me join the chorus of folks who hates typing in "xebjnwe" only to find that "you are only allowed to make a post every two minutes. You last posted 3 hours, 9 minutes ago..."

  88. Pink Roomba easily confused with Woomba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just don't confuse your new pink Roomba with the look-alike pink Woomba of Saturday Night Live fame.

    Note to the technical gods:
    I got this error when I tried to post this:
    Slashdot requires you to wait 2 minutes between each successful posting of a comment to allow everyone a fair chance at posting a comment.

    It's been 3 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment

  89. Level Playing Field? by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    So when we in America can afford to employ robots en masse and 300 million Chinese are suddenly left unemployed by "cheap overseas labor" do they have a right to cry foul about and uneven economic playing field?

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  90. sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we see a robot playing some instrument in this video, which is considered a serious technological advance, but the clip is silent: "*Music is unavailable in accordance with copyright protection."

    Yeah, I wonder how much revenue the artist lost on this one....

  91. Why not just have more kids? by tjstork · · Score: 1

    What is it about Japanese society that can be so male dominated and still not produce any children. Maybe if there men stopped spending 80 hours a week trying to make a middle manager at Toyota happy or otherwise face suicide, they would actually be able to have families instead of trying to have robots take their place.

    --
    This is my sig.
  92. My gramma can't figure her audio cassette player by chiok · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but figuring out how to use a server robot is going to be beyond the average octogenarian's understanding. Market technology toys to men in their 30s, not the elderly.

  93. No really... Trojan! by bradleyland · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure there is actually a trojan at work here. It is attempting to download an exe to my computer. Even if it's not a trojan, I don't want anyone attempting to download executables to my computer. Consider the link questionable.

    Sidenote: It may be the SWF? Don't know if that's even possible.

  94. MOD PARENT UP!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP!!!

  95. Service Robots in Service by 2010 ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department

  96. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN!!! by Cryofan · · Score: 1

    Newflash for you Randroids: I bash the elite: politicians, CEOs, plutocrats. I don't bash "America."

    WTF is "America" People do bad things, so I bash people, But I will bash the constitution, if you like. That is something that needs to go. Or to be revised out of existence, rather....

    --
    eat shiat and bark at the moon
  97. And the original ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... can be found here.

  98. They Really Look Like... by Delilah+Jones · · Score: 1

    ...a cross between Storm Troopers and Battle Tech!

    Really cool!

    But kinda creepy at the same time.

    If only Rod Serling were alive....

    --
    http://augustwestproducts.i8.com
  99. This ain't "stuff that matters." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, when there's news of robots that can perform, let's say, more intimate services, then the legions on slashdot will become interested.

  100. News For Nerds - Stuff That's Old by chr1sb · · Score: 1
    I find it amazing that hardware is advancing WAY beyond software.

    Well, fortunately the software has had a bit of time to catch up. The Reuters article, whilst current, is describing news from over one year ago, if you RTOFA.

  101. Toyota solves problem of Out Sourcing in america by BigLonn · · Score: 1

    {fake quote} sometime near 2013, "dell announces today they're downsizing all their product assembly staff's world wide and replacing them with Toyota robots. While admitting that the present generation robot can't quite get ahold of the indepth tasks involved in assembly of machines, they have no problem running forlifts and other associated support equipment in the compnies warehouses. (think this is funny, wait till someone actually pulls off the darpa grand challenge, then we'll see who's laughing) by the way robot forklifts have been around for 15 years already!