Slashdot Mirror


Google's Secret Lab

Voelspriet writes "The mystery behind eval.google.com should be solved soon. It's a secret lab of Google. Real people, from all over the world, are paid to finetune the index of Google, reveals Searchbistro, a new weblog of the Dutch reporter Henk van Ess. A Flash-movie shows some screens of Google's 'Rater Hub', Full details about Eval.Google will be published later this week.

203 comments

  1. Oops! by MicroBerto · · Score: 1

    Looks like all of those people from around the world will be getting paid for doing nothing while the site's slashdotted!

    --
    Berto
    1. Re:Oops! by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the article say that if you don't have a password you will get a blank page?

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    2. Re:Oops! by Eric604 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, I suggest you reread the article.

    3. Re:Oops! by jonfr · · Score: 1

      Google can handle it. In the meantime they will do a research on downtime. It's a secret lab after all. Or at least it was secret.

  2. Lab. by Poromenos1 · · Score: 1

    And from this article we learn what, that google has a feedback facility?

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
    1. Re:Lab. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      And from this article we learn what, that google has a feedback facility?

      Google have secrets you can't even begin to imagine, like this toast!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Lab. by syynnapse · · Score: 1

      No, you have to really read into it - you see, google is working on a human/searchengine hybrid to take over the world.

      --

      System.out.println(syynnapse.getSig());

  3. Eval?... by Jambon · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I thought they said they wouldn't do any of that?

    1. Re:Eval?... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah, i read evil.google.com too...

    2. Re:Eval?... by Gopal.V · · Score: 1
      No, they never said "Do No Eval" in their mission statement...

      I think the mystery of google's secret sauce of search engine algorithms has finally crumbled. Now I wouldn't be surprised pigeonrank was true or not.

      And perhaps they need to employ somebody other than young teenagers with left hand typing skills - see the image search results for RSS.. (mm.. seductively feathered pigeons comment ? ).
  4. Whew! by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    <sarcasm>
    Finally...past noon on the East Coast and still no Google Slashdot story....I was beginning to get worried.
    </sarcasm>

    From TFA:

    What is it? It's a lab of humans from all over the world (from China to The Netherlands, from Korea to Brasil) They are paid to check search results of Google every day. Most of the employers, called international agents by Google, were recruited through universities all over the world. The aim is to avoid spam, to get the right sites at the top of the listing and to test new features, not shown to the public yet.

    OK...so the best search engine is people. Well, as long as you have the scratch to pay these international agents (which Google certainly has), it seems like a great idea. If this arrangement can cut some of the spam, hallelujah, although I'm wondering just who chooses which sites are the 'right sites' to ocupy the top of the list...

    Anyone know where I can put in an app?
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Whew! by Naikrovek · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They've had these at Yahoo! since the beginning - they're paid surfers. Their title is "Surfer".

      This is just a plain-old good idea, I'm not surprised that Google is doing it, or that Yahoo! did it first.

      Disclaimer: I used to work for Yahoo!

      Also, the majority of the female Surfers at Y! were gorgeous when I worked there. But that's neither here nor there.

    2. Re:Whew! by pizen · · Score: 2, Funny


      so the best search engine is people.
      </Charlton Heston voice>

      Google is the Soylent Green of search engines!

    3. Re:Whew! by alnjmshntr · · Score: 1

      So much for Google being all about geeky search algorithms... I guess that doesn't work.

      --
      If I had created the world I wouldn't have messed about with butterflies and daffodils. I would have started with lasers
    4. Re:Whew! by joepeg · · Score: 1

      Det. Thorn: It's people. Google is made out of people. They're making our search engine out of people. Next thing they'll be breeding us like cattle for answers. You've gotta tell them. You've gotta tell them!

      Hatcher: I promise, Tiger. I promise. I'll tell the exchange.

      Det. Thorn: You tell everybody. Listen to me, Hatcher. You've gotta tell them! Google is people! We've gotta stop them somehow!

      --

      ZEN is a prime number in base-36

    5. Re:Whew! by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      What is it? It's a lab of humans from all over the world (from China to The Netherlands, from Korea to Brasil) They are paid to check search results of Google every day. Most of the employers, called international agents by Google, were recruited through universities all over the world. ...in other words, they're all on the Global Frequency.

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    6. Re:Whew! by ImaLamer · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as you have the scratch to pay these international agents

      I assume you mean "agent" to read "sweatshop worker"

      Asia and South America? Where the wages are "extreme" to say the least.

    7. Re:Whew! by DrinkingIllini · · Score: 1

      Anyone know where I can put in an app?

      They'd put these little quiz/application things in the student newspaper here (UIUC) all the time last year. It usually consisted of a bunch of pattern finding / abstract thought questions. I think this must be what they were actually applications for.

    8. Re:Whew! by ryanjensen · · Score: 1
      Would you rather make $10 a day surfing the web, $10 a day working in a shoe factory for 14 hours, or $0 a day without a job? I'd say Google is doing them a favor. (wink)

      The wages may be extreme, but the cost of living is also "extreme" in the same way.

    9. Re:Whew! by WoBIX · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly. Those were actually messages to sleeper agents left over from the cold war.

      Now excuse me, my ring tone just told me to kill Pat Sajak.

    10. Re:Whew! by twofidyKidd · · Score: 1

      "Also, the majority of the female Surfers at Y! were gorgeous when I worked there."

      Hiring hot chicks is ALSO just a plain-old good idea.

      --


      Hades, PoD: Official Advocate
    11. Re:Whew! by Patik · · Score: 1
      Also, the majority of the female Surfers at Y!
      Two out of the three?
    12. Re:Whew! by bill_kress · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I was under the impression that they already monitored the selections people made within the searches and PageRank to adjust future searches.

      How is paying them to do so better?

    13. Re:Whew! by markhb · · Score: 1

      Chuck Woolery?? Is that you??

      --
      Save Maine's economy: write stuff down. All comments are exclusively my own, not my employer.
    14. Re:Whew! by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 1

      When I do a search on google I get a page linking directly to the site urls, so google doesn't even know which selections I'm making. Looks like they aren't doing this.

    15. Re:Whew! by Ajmuller · · Score: 1

      actually, sometimes you get a special cookie that gives you tracking URLs on search results pages.

  5. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wednesday, June 1. 2005

    Google Secret Lab, Prelude

    It's one of the best kept secrets of Google. It's a mystery on Webmasterworld. Also in Europe (France) they don't know what to expect from that odd URL http://eval.google.com./ Click it and you get ...nothing. The site reveals itself only if you have the proper login and if you use a network known by Google. Residues of Eval.google are found on the web, but the full content of the mystery site has never been published before. Here it is: the real story about Eval.Google. And welcome to the first entry in Search Bistro. .

    What is it? It's a lab of humans from all over the world (from China to The Netherlands, from Korea to Brasil) They are paid to check search results of Google every day. Most of the employers, called international agents by Google, were recruited through universities all over the world. The aim is to avoid spam, to get the right sites at the top of the listing and to test new features, not shown to the public yet.

    I call it Google's Secret Evaluation Lab, but the real title is less adventurous; 'Rater Hub Google'. The coming weeks I will reveal all I know about this lab. To keep you busy, here's a Flash-movie from a part of the site. Stay tuned, next posting will be on Wednesday.

  6. Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thought it said "evil.google.com" for a sec then instead of "eval.google.com".

    1. Re:Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THAT'S REALLY FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! if it's not +5 already then it should be. you see, it said eval! but he thought it said evil! like google! haha! fuck the system!

    2. Re:Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not very nice.

    3. Re:Evil by mbaudis · · Score: 1

      he is just eval.

    4. Re:Evil by hosecoat · · Score: 1

      and all this time googles been playing with us, when they really ment 'do no eval'

    5. Re:Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shit. That's what I thought it said.

      Huuuzah! Fucking huzzaaaaaaah!

    6. Re:Evil by thomkt · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear I'm not the only one that thought that.

  7. secret lab by mindwar · · Score: 1

    .. every mad genius need a secred lab

    1. Re:secret lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and a spell checker...

  8. YAGS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jesus christ on a stick. Yet another Google story. Who'd have thunk it?

    1. Re:YAGS by c0d3h4x0r · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sorry, but "Jesus Christ on a Stick" has already been patented by my company. Prepare to be sued.

      --
      Moderator hint: a comment is neither "Flamebait" nor "Troll" if it is true.
    2. Re:YAGS by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Who new Pontius Pilate posted to slashdot?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:YAGS by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Hah, at least I beat you to "Pope on a Rope".

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    4. Re:YAGS by Leebert · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but "Jesus Christ on a Stick" has already been patented by my company.

      Your website says you work for Microsoft.

      Somehow, I'm unsurprised. :)

  9. Compute Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when they said that it's all algorithmic, they were referring to Magrethea's latest computer?

  10. Wouldn't this look better? by peragrin · · Score: 1

    Secretlab.google.com ?

    make sure you don't let google search it or it might be come known.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:Wouldn't this look better? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Hmmm... So, let's say you are a 31337 h4x0r and you are looking to 0wn some b0x. Which host would you try? eval.google.com secretlab.google.com The latter, of course....then you can say 'w00t! 1 0wnz0r3d g00gl3's s3cr37l4b!!!

  11. Eval ~ Evil??? by noidentity · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Could "eval" be a misspelling of "evil", proving that Google has been knowingly "eval" all along? Time to switch search engines!!!

    1. Re:Eval ~ Evil??? by deutschemonte · · Score: 1

      That would have been one of the best google jokes ever.

      --
      The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    2. Re:Eval ~ Evil??? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      ...or maybe the should create a site evil.google.com, and have it resolve to either a blank page, or in spite, MSN search. Throw in good.google.com that resolves to Google's main page, and you're set.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  12. Dr. Eval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is the secret eval lab built in to the side of a volcano?

  13. Don't you love it by slashrogue · · Score: 1

    When the submitter of the story writes the summary as if he were an objective 3rd party when he isn't? Far as the actual thing goes, it's interesting but so far very few details. I want to know how much these guys get paid and how long they work each day, and where do I apply if it's decent? ;)

    1. Re:Don't you love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
  14. evil.slashdot.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer the super-super-secret Google lab at evil.slashdot.com, where searches are reviewed by frickin' sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads.

  15. Do no eval by tehshen · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is proof... Google is slowly turning eval!

    </bad puns>

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    1. Re:Do no eval by Reverend528 · · Score: 1

      Or it could just mean they're switching to Lisp...

    2. Re:Do no eval by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Python has eval too. I think...::checks:: yep its got eval.

      --
      Why not fork?
  16. Real people? by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    Damn I always imagined Google would have legions of tiny googlenauts or elves to do this sort of thing.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:Real people? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      No, they're pigeons.

    2. Re:Real people? by pizen · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Real people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you can't read. Google is using Pigeon Rank technology. it's not elves, or people, it's pigeons! http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html

  17. Oh no! Secret labs! by half_d · · Score: 1

    Are the US going to attack Google, like they did with Irac's secret labs??

    1. Re:Oh no! Secret labs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe once we figure out where Irac is. Moronc.

    2. Re:Oh no! Secret labs! by chadbailey · · Score: 1

      No, and learn how to spell.

  18. There aren't many people evaluating pages by waynegoode · · Score: 1

    There aren't many people evaluating pages. It's page rank is only 513,258; right after the ever-talked-about talk.guns.ru.

    1. Re:There aren't many people evaluating pages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  19. Apparently, the pigeon's union... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....wanted too much in the way of medical.

  20. surprise ? by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Is this really so surprising to people that google has a human feedback loop ?

    Their pagerank system, while incredibly good, is not infalliable, and requires some checks and balances.

    Did they ever say directly that they didnt use humans to check up on the system?

    I dont really see what the big secret is here..

    1. Re:surprise ? by SolidGround · · Score: 1

      It means that Google either retired/fired all of its pigeons (http://www.google.com/technology/pigeonrank.html) in favor of humans, or it reveals that the pigeons were actually peons all along.

  21. Gotta love the mainstream media. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Real people, from all over the world

    As opposed to imaginary people that exist only in my head.

    1. Re:Gotta love the mainstream media. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No... no there's imaginary people all over the world too, I've seen them.

  22. Forget that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know the secret behind evil.google.com

    1. Re:Forget that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just want to see the flash-movie of Google's 'Hater Rub.'

  23. Hey, wait a minute...! by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought Google was all about NOT being eval. What gives?

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:Hey, wait a minute...! by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish.

      Teach a man to fish, you give up your monopoly on fisheries.

      Give a man a fish, he owes you one fish.

      Teach many men to fish, you create healthy competition, and collect on fishing IP licensing.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    2. Re:Hey, wait a minute...! by BlackShirt · · Score: 1

      mod down

    3. Re:Hey, wait a minute...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build a man a fire, he stays warm for a day.

      Set a man on fire, he stays warm for the rest of his life.

    4. Re:Hey, wait a minute...! by sunwolf · · Score: 1
      </bad puns>
      I thought the slash meant the bad puns stopped?

      Well, if one wasn't good enough...</bad puns></bad puns></bad puns></bad puns></bad puns></bad puns></bad puns>!
    5. Re:Hey, wait a minute...! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't truly harness the power of the internet without using both sides, both the goog and the eval.

  24. pigeon by unk1911 · · Score: 0, Troll
    1. Re:pigeon by Datrio · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I always thought that it's pigeons which bring me the results, not real people :(

  25. Google Slashdotted by gcatullus · · Score: 1

    Looks like Google has finally been slashdotted, or well at least a tiny part of Google.

  26. Secret Lab? by grassy_knoll · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't tell me it's in a supposedly inactive volcano on a south-pacific island, perhaps guarded by large numbers of minions in silver jumpsuits.

    'Cause while I'm sure there are many Phd's there... I'd like to think none of them went to evil medical school.

    NB: Not responsible for the reactions of the humor impaired.

    1. Re:Secret Lab? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of Google's Secret Lair.

      --

      mbbac

    2. Re:Secret Lab? by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      No, that would be "Secret Liar"

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    3. Re:Secret Lab? by bmalia · · Score: 1

      And do they have sharks with friggin laser beams attached to their heads?

      --
      There's no place like ~/
    4. Re:Secret Lab? by SUB7IME · · Score: 1

      True, most PhDs didn't go to any medical school.

  27. Erotic Writing by mizel · · Score: 1

    I especially like the last link in the flash-movie:
    "Erotic Writing"
    Looks like this google agent is enjoying his job.

  28. Let me guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And they're building a giant laser?

  29. Google Rocks! by coopaq · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Google I love you! Google! I want to have your babies! Gooooooogle!!!

    1. Re:Google Rocks! by GraZZ · · Score: 3, Funny

      Insightful? WTFBBQ?!

    2. Re:Google Rocks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half Man. Half Search Engine. All Cop.

    3. Re:Google Rocks! by coopaq · · Score: 2, Funny
      Insightful? WTFBBQ?!

      Dude, I don't know, but shutup about it.

      If the people find some infinite wisdom in it then more points for me :)

    4. Re:Google Rocks! by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 1

      God I wish I had mod points for you.

  30. Can't get to the link... by bogaboga · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ...because it's already slashdotted! Since the slashdot effect is almost always guaranteed here at slashdot, what can really be done to avoid it? We do really need a solution to this effect.

    What about slashdot editors setting up a mirror before posting?

    1. Re:Can't get to the link... by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Read the Slashdot FAQ, moron. If users of Slashdot who subscribe (and thus can see the story early) would CoralCache it and then post a link, we'd all be saved.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    2. Re:Can't get to the link... by General+Wesc · · Score: 1

      > Since the slashdot effect is almost always guaranteed here at slashdot, what can really be done to avoid it? We do really need a solution to this effect.
      Google, as always, has the answer.

    3. Re:Can't get to the link... by Datrio · · Score: 1
  31. proof of their pur eval by th0mas.sixbit.org · · Score: 1

    http://toolbar.netcraft.com/stats/hosters

    proof of their eval - they are #4 most phishiest hosting company!

    (anyone have an explanation for this?)

    --
    twitter.com/gravitronic
    1. Re:proof of their pur eval by topper24hours · · Score: 1

      Maybe they consider companies than have toolbar products that take over the standard msn search and switch it to google for example to be phishing products somehow?

    2. Re:proof of their pur eval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because #7 is even unknown. how this source can be reliable if even entries are unknown?

    3. Re:proof of their pur eval by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .. because they don't know what to name it even though they're all being hosted by the same company?

      Netcraft is reliable; they are in the business of detecting and alerting people of phishing sites and imho are one of the leading companies doing so.

  32. This doesn't surprise me at all. by bigwayne · · Score: 1

    It doesn't surprise me how they have this set up.

    The system is widely distributed (read: international), low cost (read: $20 an hour), with no single point of failure, every person can be replaced if they break down, because it's been factored into the design! They apply the same Zerg mentality to everything!

    --
    400 Person LAN for Charity: Zion LAN 2005
    1. Re:This doesn't surprise me at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      In Sovjet Russia, Zerg mentality is you!

  33. Google is great and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... but I will be impressed when regular expressions are supported.

    (Yes, I know it is hard, but isn't that why Google hires all those smart people?)

  34. Mirror!!! by Cavalkaf · · Score: 2

    Managed to get the files just before it got slashdoted :-D http://cavalkaf.frihost.net/mirror/secret_google/ (Entire Page) http://cavalkaf.frihost.net/mirror/secret_google/s ecretlab.swf (Flash Movie) Oh, and visit my forum http://forum.scuzzstuff.org/ while you are at it ;-)

    1. Re:Mirror!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And exactly why couldn't you use CoralCache? Too much bandwidth, too easy, too... logical? Let me guess, all of the above? Oh, you just wanted to karma whore and plug your dumb forum.

    2. Re:Mirror!!! by Albinofrenchy · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of this "Karma whoring" bullshit from AC's. Why couldn't you use CoralCache? Oh, you just wanted to bitch. Have the integrity to post your name or shut up.

      When it comes down to it, he was doing a favor so people could see the page. If he has something to gain, so be it, he never claimed it was a fucking charity.

      --
      "A man is but the product of his thoughts what he thinks, he becomes." -Mahatma Gandhi
  35. Unfortunately... by spacefight · · Score: 1

    ... neither eval.google.com nor searchbistro.com were available for comment :P

    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Morgahastu · · Score: 4, Informative

      Eval.google.com isn't down, it just doens't respond to you unless you're a known ip.

    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whatever. google is smart enough to know my IP. even I know my IP.

  36. Oh My God! by tfaust · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's made out of people! eval.google.com is people! It's people!

    1. Re:Oh My God! by geoff43230 · · Score: 1

      It's solentGoogle!

    2. Re:Oh My God! by Muhammar · · Score: 1

      Yes, the secret is out and Eval is dealing with the situation...And yes, the MIBs are mostly people.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    3. Re:Oh My God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reply's been made 10 times already, and i still don't get it. Anyone care to explain ?

  37. Biased lab. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've been finding google's viability as a search engine to be verry questionable in rare moments. It's jest that brightens my day, but then I wonder. They have a pre-calculated site rating mechanism situated by a lobby, and there are moments that I find myself adding more words to a search and getting more results than if I had searched for a single word. So, hesitantly, I googled for that related subject matter and found this document explains much of the hidden technical merits google has been found lacking and that some people like me experience. Quoting from that article, as to not induce a website failure;
    PHRASE SEARCH INACCURACIES: Phrase searches do not always work right on Google. Sometimes this is due to Google finding the words within the phrase query in anchor text on pages that link from that anchor text to the page shown as a result. But the words do not necessarily appear in exactly the correct order within the anchor text. See the search on "american medical association" for example, a problem that dates back to at least 2000. Another example from Dec. 22, 2002: A search on "montana mountain ranges" found a page that contained "Montana's Mountain Ranges" but did not contain the exact phrase given. Status: Ongoing
    Despite these difficulties, I actually enjoy hearing about Google and its success. One day, Google may be the OS of choice for libraries; and the Libraries of Congress measurment may see a successor in a new undesignated rate by Google designers.
    1. Re:Biased lab. by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      If you're looking for an exact phrase you can just put the query "in quotes" and it'll look for exact matches.

    2. Re:Biased lab. by moonbender · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are you kidding? He obviously knows about the phrase-feature - doesn't everybody? - the problem he describes is that it doesn't really work properly. Try the example queries he quotes. Result 2 when searching for exact matches on "montana mountain ranges" is indeed Montana's Mountain Ranges (put in bold so there is no doubt it's this phrase that triggers the hit).

      Of course, this isn't so much a bug as a documented feature - Google automatically searches for morphologically similar keywords. But what typically is useful can be annoying when you really do want exact matches and nothing else.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  38. Raters by RealProgrammer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I wonder if they use meta-moderation?

    [rant]

    Do the folks who meta-mod the raters actually get more rater points, or is it like a certain well-known site (hint: rhymes with "cashbot") where you can meta-mod all the time and never get to mod?

    Every time I ignore that certain site (rhymes with "'stache rot") for a few weeks and come back, voila, I'm rewarded with mod points. I don't like that. When I come back after being away, I want to spout off, not critique. Gimme mod points after I've been active every day for a while, so I know what to do with them.

    [/rant]

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:Raters by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      "... I want to spout off, not critique...."

      So it works just fine.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Raters by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

      my sig says it all

    3. Re:Raters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's your sig say?

  39. abc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    abc

  40. A few years old by m00nun1t · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum3/11972.htm discusses people getting referrals from eval.google.com back in 2003, so it seems this has been around for a while.

  41. Google, google google, google by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

    Someone should create a slash google site.

    1. Re:Google, google google, google by teorth · · Score: 1
      Someone should create a slash google site.

      Someone already has.

      Terry

  42. $20 an hour by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 1

    Many people are asking as to how much Google pays those international agents. The complete page of the blog didn't load (obviously /. ed) and the alternate text for the image read "... $20 per hour.." so thats how much they are paying

  43. Am I the only one... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

    Who read eval.google.com as evil.google.com? I figured they had taken the "be good" option to a new level and had locked all their evil stuff away to its own site;-)

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously not, because if you would've read the first 10 comments you would've seen that at least 3 of them said the same thing.

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tried evil.google.com and ended up at MSN search. (yes IE is the only browser I'm allowed to use at work)

  44. Soylent Google by DuckofDeath87 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Google is made from people!

    1. Re:Soylent Google by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1

      Oh my god! Did we just SLASHDOT PEOPLE??

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    2. Re:Soylent Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps google is building a large supercomputer to find the question to 42?

  45. Ahh, so these guys are the reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...that everytime I search for pretty much *any* kind of product info, the first three or four pages of info are filled with fly-by-night dot bombs trying to sell me crap?

    Is it really so difficult to find decent product reviews these days? /gripe

  46. Like /. Moderation?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If these reviewers do for search results what /. moderators do for comments like these, the world will be a better place for it.

    1. Re:Like /. Moderation?? by downsize · · Score: 1

      right, that's what we need to make this world a better place, a bunch of idiots unable to separate their feelings or opinions on the results - or simply not intelligent enough to figure out if the search result is helpful or not to the searcher.

      how do you know I don't want to see baseball links when google for '...midget and with a bat'

      --
      do you have shinyfeet?
  47. Slashdotted. by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Slashdotted already. Google cache anyone?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
  48. minority report by SirChris · · Score: 0

    so basically they have a group of people like minority report does behind the scenes doing all the real work

  49. manual review...not a 'secret lab' by mcguyver · · Score: 1

    At first glance this looks like a portal for people to manually review serps and provide feedback for the serps that are in beta. Yahoo does this. Google has recruited people over the past year to review results (first indication of this came from a craiglist ad). If this is true then it's cool to witness how this process is accomplished. While on the subject of monitoring serps, here's a way to search on Yahoo and tune your results.

  50. Obligatory Matrix Tie-in by Wattsman · · Score: 1
    TFA:
    What is it? It's a lab of humans from all over the world (from China to The Netherlands, from Korea to Brasil) They are paid to check search results of Google every day. Most of the employers, called international agents by Google, were recruited through universities all over the world. The aim is to avoid spam, to get the right sites at the top of the listing and to test new features, not shown to the public yet.


    SEO employee: Our client listings got kicked from the first page of Google. I don't know how.
    SEO boss: I know. They changed their methods.
    SEO employee: Are they using agents?
    SEO boss: Yes.
    SEO employee: God damn it.
    SEO boss: You have to focus. Not everyone is using Google. There are people who still search through MSN and AOL. You can do it.
    SEO employee: All right.
    SEO boss: Go.
    1. Re:Obligatory Matrix Tie-in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your title changed the tie-in from funny to lame.

      Don't give away the joke in the first line, lamer.

  51. Bias? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

    It's going to turn into a Slashdot GroupThink (tm) situation. Indexing must be done without bias, something that MOST (certainly not at /.) are not.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Bias? by NoTheory · · Score: 1

      This isn't a group think issue, because individuals presumably not using a judgement of what they think other people want, they're doing it via faculty to determine what they think is best for them.

      On top of that, why isn't this the way you want to do it? Essentially, what this is doing is highering a bunch of low rate librarians, or researchers, figuring out a computational way to amplify their results so that i can scale to a huge number of people (rather than just a few) and then running with it.

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
  52. its not slash dotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    actually if you read the pasted in story from a user above... it explains that this website comes up blank regardless, unless your computer is in a trusted ip space or you give the appropriate get parameters...

  53. Agggh!!! by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Google searches are made out of people! They're people!

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Agggh!!! by Skater · · Score: 1

      That puts a new spin on "I'm feeling lucky", doesn't it?

  54. Nothing to see here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nope, not to rate Google's index. Workers are not directly employed by Google but by a third-party company. Employees sign a non-disclosure form. Pays fairly well, but no benefits.

  55. Make your own news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of finding News for nerds or Stuff that matters just start your own site and put one article on it and link it to slashdot!

    Author: Voelspriet
    Author Email: henk@vaness.nl
    Page: http://www.searchbistro.com/
    Creation Date: May 22, 2005
    Registered to: voelspriet.nl

    Could you be a little more obvious?

  56. If it weren't for GOOGLE, NO Lesbian STRAPON PORN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it weren't for GOOGLE, NO Lesbian STRAPON PORN!

    I therefore welcome these Jesus Christ on a Stick google overlords!

  57. I bet their labs have more than that! by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    I bet they have a thousand monkeys working on a thousand typewriters.

    Burns: It was the best of times, it was the blurst of times!

    1. Re:I bet their labs have more than that! by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Naw, all it takes is a hundred.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    2. Re:I bet their labs have more than that! by hosecoat · · Score: 1
      I bet they have a thousand monkeys working on a thousand typewriters.
      For years there has been a theory that millions of monkeys typing at random on millions of typewriters would reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. The Internet has proven this theory to be untrue. - Anonymous
    3. Re:I bet their labs have more than that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For years there has been a theory that millions of monkeys typing at random on millions of typewriters would reproduce the entire works of Shakespeare. The Internet has proven this theory to be untrue. - Anonymous

      Are there no websites that include Shakespeare's work? I find that possibility duobious at best....

  58. Google now advertising with Aurora by bbrockit · · Score: 1

    I was searching Google to find out how to remove this obnoxious Aurora adware client when I got this pop-up ad for Google Desktop Search.

    1. Re:Google now advertising with Aurora by GoogleGuy · · Score: 1

      Thanks for mentioning this. I forwarded your url within Google, and someone is investigating. They're checking for agencies or spots that we're using for the Google Desktop Search.

      Thanks again--I appreciate you noticing this.
      GoogleGuy

  59. Secret lab discovered? Time to call in... by IronChefMorimoto · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Brock Samson (http://www.adultswim.com/shows/venturebros/index. html ) to kick the sh*t out of this guy running the blog.

    IronChefMorimoto

  60. Where's the beef in that? by broothal · · Score: 1

    Uhm... either you're all getting this wrong, or I am. Of course google has people evaluating their search index. You guys aren't really buying the pigeon thingy, right?

    Of course they're evaluating their search and ranking technology all the time. It's also evolving all the time. And of course there's a site where you can log into from all over the world (google is global you know) and of course this site is restricted to those people they hired to do the job.

  61. Pronunciation by 64nDh1 · · Score: 1
    I'd like to think none of them went to evil medical school.

    Actually, it's pronounced Eval medical school

  62. They're using PRECOGS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We gotta do a search for Max Von Sydow right away! :-)

  63. Way to toot your own horn. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Voelspriet -> henk@vaness.nl

    Henk van Ess

    Domain Name: SEARCHBISTRO.COM
    Registrant:
    voelspriet.nl
    regenboog 36
    amersfoort 3824ED
    Netherlands

    Registered through: GoDaddy.com
    Domain Name: SEARCHBISTRO.COM
    Created on: 22-May-05
    Expires on: 22-May-07
    Last Updated on: 22-May-05

    Administrative Contact:
    van ess, henk henk@vaness.nl
    voelspriet.nl
    regenboog 36
    amersfoort 3824ED
    Netherlands
    (084) 222-8995 Fax -- (084) 222-8995
    Technical Contact:
    van ess, henk henk@vaness.nl
    voelspriet.nl
    regenboog 36
    amersfoort 3824ED
    Netherlands
    (084) 222-8995 Fax -- (084) 222-8995

    Domain servers in listed order:
    WSC1.JOMAX.NET
    WSC2.JOMAX.NET

    I wonder how many ads are on that page when it's not /.ed

  64. Flash animation on second server by Voelspriet · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've put the Flash-animation of eval.google.com on a second server.

  65. Hmmmmmm.... Cat's out of the bag it seems... by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    "The mystery behind eval.google.com should be solved soon. It's a secret lab of Google."

    Doesn't seem too secret to me.

    Damn you /.7 (Licence to Google)

    Borgle

    Bork Bork Bork

  66. Google is missing a link by theurge14 · · Score: 0

    I still can't find the link to the Colonel's Secret Recipe.

  67. I know what this is..... by JaF893 · · Score: 1

    Google has made a Beowulf cluster of old Korean people and its based in Soviet Russia! But it will be in Beta until Duke Nukem Forever comes out in Japan.

    (eval is the Russian for Beowulf cluster of Old Korean people)

  68. They lied to me! by Given+M.+Sur · · Score: 1

    That's interesting. When I emailed them to suggest that they bump google up to the top of a search for "www" they told me they don't edit results by hand.

    Just in case you're wondering: I made that suggestion because of firefox's feature that does an I'm Feeling Lucky search if the url you typed can't be found. So, if you accidentally type www/something.net you'll get the first result for "www" which happened at the time to be Microsoft - now it's Yahoo.

    --
    nil
    1. Re:They lied to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who ever said they edited results by hand?

      They are testing the quality of the results, not necessarily changing them. Don't you want Ford to quality assurance test the cars they are selling before you get in in with your family? Why should Google be any different just because they are handling search results? Don't they have a responsibility to be as accurate as possible?

  69. /.ed by tedhiltonhead · · Score: 1

    Wow, we finally slashdotted Google!

    1. Re:/.ed by Delilah+Jones · · Score: 1

      Is that kind of like Googling /.?

      --
      http://augustwestproducts.i8.com
  70. Secret Labs by GoogleGuy · · Score: 1

    Huh. I guess the sharks with frickin' lasers on their heads must have let their guards down.

    Seriously, every search engine does evaluation on their results. It's a good way to test that relevance is high, especially in different languages and locations. The fact that Google does lots of testing and evaluation of our results in tons of different ways shouldn't be a surprise. That's part of the 70-30 breakdown where ~70% of our effort is on the core areas of search and advertising, but we usually don't talk about that 70% work to improve our results or validate their quality. So keep it quiet; I hear some other search engines read Slashdot too. ;)

  71. this'd be a whole lot cooler.. by kemster · · Score: 1

    this would be a whole lot cooler if the testing was being done by oompa loompas, as opposed to people..

  72. So google admits it's algorithms suck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yahoo has been doing human manipulation to search for years, which is why it's top results are better.

    Google's holy algorithms can't help it figure out context, so it needs humans. So basically they're admitting their techniques suck, need to be tweaked, and they're copying Yahoo for search ideas.

  73. Google REPL? by sinserve · · Score: 1
    For a second there I thought I was gonna get a google repl;
    (define google
    (lambda ()
    (and (print (eval (read)))
    (google)))
  74. Mirror of searchbistro by agoodm · · Score: 1

    I am putting up a mirror of search bistro. Unfortunately my server host's data centre is currently having issues with some new gige pipes so my mirror itself may go down, slow, unavailable. The mirror is still being created (site slow and overloaded) and will gradually be entered into here - http://files.photojerk.com/alan/www.searchbistro.c om You will see the 404 image for images that havnt yet been downloaded.

  75. Is this new? by mathwizxp · · Score: 1

    People have been talking about this for a while... http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum3/11972.htm

  76. -1, plagiarism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copying posts from other sites sucks... but copying posts from the same thread made 4 minutes earlier? http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=151336&cid=126 95793

  77. Huh? by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

    I don't get it. Where do the pigeons fit into this scheme?

  78. Chuck Heston Said It Best by chaoticset · · Score: 1

    Google search is people, it's made of people!

    --

    -----------------------
    You are what you think.
  79. Job Posting for Google's Secret Lab by i8myh8 · · Score: 1

    I just found this job posting at Monster in Canada for a job at Google's Secret Lab. Let's see if Monster can handle being Slashdotted.

  80. Slashdot copy.. by Stormmind · · Score: 1

    They obviously read too much slashdot and thought that moderation-system was neat. So when are we going to hear about an even bigger secret of google - meta-eval.google.com?

  81. Proof of the Evil Bit by sbowles · · Score: 2, Funny
    This seems to be one of the first documented uses of the Evil Bit (RFC 3514):

    eval -> 01100101011101100110000101101100
    evil -> 01100101011101100110100101101100

    Google has obviously turned off the Evil Bit.

    --
    You sly dog: you got me monologuing! - Syndrome
  82. dr.Eval! by dostick · · Score: 1

    So Google is creation of doctor Eval!

  83. google servers: by Eric+S+Raymond · · Score: 1

    I think I've found all the google sites, using google:

    -www -answers -directory -groups-beta -labs -investor -toolbar -desktop -adwords -gmail -news -eval -services

    --
    Bypass Compulsory Web Registration -- http://bugmenot.com/
    1. Re:google servers: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, all 330,000,000 of them.

  84. Google turning eval? by JD-1027 · · Score: 1

    Noooooooooooo!

  85. Re:Google Rocks! - omgbrbbbq by Oizoken · · Score: 0

    did u mean omgbrbbbq?

    --
    Live, let _them_ die
  86. No secret lab is complete without... by whackaxe · · Score: 0

    A head Honchos private office complete with giant laser and shark pool. google sharks, now that would be fun.

  87. unless they really aer that geeky... by toastee · · Score: 1

    just saying that e v a l = f u c k, look at the number/letter keys on your phone.

    --
    - Better to speak your mind than to remain silent, or someone may speak for you.
  88. Yahoo's secret lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should go check out Yahoo Mindset. Now that's some real search engine news.

    What? This isn't about google? Why are you holding that knif3sdlkjflk

  89. They should do it like HotorNot by Delilah+Jones · · Score: 1

    Seriously,

    Why doesn't Google do it like HotorNot.com? (You know, the famed picture rating website)

    HotorNot is moderated by volunteer users, most of whom are simply bored Internet addicts, who want to feel that they are contributing to some greater good, while they kill time on the WWW.

    Couldn't Google do the same thing? I'm sure many bored cubicle people would be more than happy to volunteer their down-time to contributing to a greater cause, such as Google searches.

    You know, they could have user-moderated searches, taking a page out of /.'s book.

    Or, if this is too complicated, they could simply have checkboxes that say something like "Check here if this was what you were looking for" and "Check her if this was NOT what you were looking for."

    Or, maybe they could track the actual website access by IP address, kind of like Amazon does it (much to their benefit and credit, I think). They could then use this history to find out stuff like, "When people type 'Phil Lesh' into a Google search, they have mostly ended up surfing these websites more than others (in order of access popularity."

    The same thing could be done for any kind of Google searches--Images, Froogle, etc.

    --
    http://augustwestproducts.i8.com
  90. "people + computer = success" by archiles · · Score: 1

    This just proved that only people or computer is not capabale enough to do the job as "searching the web". In fact, the google model of "mainly computer + less people" is better than the yahoo model of "mainly people + less computer".

  91. eval == evaluate ... by after · · Score: 1

    To evaluate the search results.

    1. Re:eval == evaluate ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you sir!
      I will write down this information very carefully one a Post-It Note.

  92. Eval? They just misspelled EVIL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next thing you know they'll be putting out a spyware-ridden OS product.

  93. Huh? by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

    I thought their corporate charter specifically said that Google should 'do no eval'?

    --
    -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
  94. I smell a big outsourcing at Google soon by Chr0n0 · · Score: 1

    We should start a campaign to save those Pigeons from loosing their job, don't let humans take over their job!

  95. Don't be Eval.... by ATLgerm · · Score: 1

    Predictions for future google sub.domains:

    borg.google.com
    total.global.dependence.google.com
    mindcontrol.google.com
    cmon-you-know-you-want-it.google.com
    im-feeling-homicidal.google.com
    tie-my-shoes-for-me.google.com
    we-buy-souls.google.com
    parishiltons-sexpartners.google.com
    who-killed-jfk.google.com
    people-unnecessarily-tasered-by-overzealous-cops.g oogle.com
    anon.slashdot.mods.that.cant.wait.for.another.goog le.story.google.com

    Any I missed?

  96. Re:US NIGGERS ONLY FAIL IT EVERYWHERE CUZ OF RACIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ! He lives !

  97. MOD PARENT UP by inKubus · · Score: 1

    That's cool. Real cool. I love Yahoo.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  98. Google sells out by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    Surely they've broken one of the founding rules of Google: Don't Be Eval.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  99. eval.google.com? by redeye69 · · Score: 1

    One small step away from evil.google.com

    --
    Without precision, my life would be imprecise....