Slashdot Mirror


Command Line for the Web

flood6 writes "SearchEngineWatch offers a look at a new method of interacting with the Internet, YubNub. This 'social command line for the web' lets users create commands that interact with websites. Currently, most of the commands apply to search, but new commands could work with any site that accepts variables passed with HTML's GET command. For example, iap moon would search the Internet Archive for all media related to 'moon'."

243 comments

  1. Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I like the concept, however the premise is the flaw. What I mean by this is that the social concept of letting people add their own commands is the biggest draw, but the biggest flaw. Doing a quick ls on the site reveals such choice commands on the first page:

    p Created 2005-06-20 16:21 - Description - Nominate - www.pogo.com --does nothing

    tiki Created 2005-06-20 15:10 - Description - Nominate - http://www.tehanitrading.com/ --takes you to somone's website only

    And then of course you have the sophisticated ones:

    fuckthefucker Created 2005-06-20 12:55 - Description - Nominate - http - does nothing

    And if you try to create a legitimate command and something like "p" is already taken you are out of luck. This is why you will need someone to moderate it from time to time (this is sort of on the to do list by flagging spam commands, but it looks like they also have a potential problem with bot submissions as well). But, once you do this then you get the problem of my command is better than your command. It would be nice to see an individual implementation whereby you could store your own commands and could "share" them with others.

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    1. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Interesting
      What I mean by this is that the social concept of letting people add their own commands is the biggest draw, but the biggest flaw. Doing a quick ls on the site reveals such choice commands on the first page:

      The solution to this should be obvious: namespaces.

      i.e. Have a basic set of commands. These are available to all users. Then allow users to register accounts on the system. Each account comes with its own namespace. New commands can be created and shared with the world under your namespace, then can be promoted to the basic set when they become popular enough.

      For example, if I created a command that searched the web for the best pepperjack cheese, I could share it as:
      batman:pepperjack
      When it gets promoted to the basic set, then I can type:
      pepperjack
      See? Easy. :-)

      Now I just have to figure out what someone would do with this tool. :-/
    2. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by aberson · · Score: 2, Funny

      thank GOD I now have a command line shortcut for "vagsmell"!

    3. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Jerf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Duh... it orders pepperjack to the batcave!

      Too bad it's 2005; dot-coms were built on less.

    4. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by The+Philosophers+Cat · · Score: 2, Funny

      I totally agree!!

      for example how is the following command useful?

      vagsmell
      Gives a healthy description of the smells of vaginas
      Created 2005-06-20 18:10 - Description - Nominate - http://myvag.net/smell/

      oh yeah i forgot, this is /.
      maybe that command does have some use *sigh*

    5. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by siriuskase · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The solution to this should be obvious: namespaces.

      There's no need for a formal "promotion" step. Commands could propogate the same was as del.icio.us bookmarks. Popular ones can collect in the "popular" namespace. If you know someone who creates good commands, you can list or subcribe to what's available in their namespace. If you really like somethiing, you can copy to your own which would bump up its popularity rating.

      Here's the documentation for their system if you aren't familiar already.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    6. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Momoru · · Score: 1

      Even worse, there seems to be no way to edit them once created.

    7. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by denissmith · · Score: 1

      you can write a command that tastes cheese? Cool!

      --
      I have nothing to hide. So, why are you spying on me?
    8. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      Command line internet: because graduate students have decided the internet wasn't hard enough to navigate as is.

    9. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by AngryFatMan · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could have a cooking namespace with subcommands for various ingredients. For example if I have some steak, cilantro, and pepperjack cheese, a command like recipe steak cilantro pepperjack would be very valuable. Similarly, if I find a recipe with an ingredient I don't have, like mushrooms, a mushroom command which allows me to find out where I can find the best mushrooms would be very useful.

    10. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by idontgno · · Score: 1
      if I find a recipe with an ingredient I don't have, like mushrooms, a mushroom command which allows me to find out where I can find the best mushrooms would be very useful.

      And the nice thing about namespace separation is that the "mushroom" in the "food" namespace probably won't take you to a recipe for mushroom tea. That would be in the "drug" namespace.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    11. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by mattdm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's no need for a formal "promotion" step. Commands could propogate the same was as del.icio.us bookmarks. Popular ones can collect in the "popular" namespace. If you know someone who creates good commands, you can list or subcribe to what's available in their namespace. If you really like somethiing, you can copy to your own which would bump up its popularity rating.

      I'm not sure the same things all apply here. What if the Solaris killall was suddenly more popular than the Linux (psmisc) command with the same name ? The Linux version kills all processes matching the given name -- the Solaris version kills all processes flat out. Ooops.

      (Obviously, this isn't actual Unix commands, but the same concept applies -- it's nice for a command to do the same thing from day to day!)

    12. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I agree, for this reason it's not terribly useful.

      Out of curiosity, I checked out the "slashdot" command. I then saw that it searched articles. Great, sort of what you could expect. It's "man page" says:

      Search Slashdot for a given term. ... as it's intent.

      But what happens when you actually use the command as e.g. "slashdot google"?
      It only search Science topics, because the smart guy who made the command gave it this string:

      http://slashdot.org/search.pl?tid=14&query=%s&auth or=&sort=1&op=stories

      Bold face mine.

      And now no one can fix it besides creating own personal things like my_slashdot?

      Sure, right now it's just a matter of clicking to fix the search to be non-science only, but when they implement piping as one of the planned features, then that's not a solution.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    13. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've already used a simple command line search ( you're confusing "search" with "internet" by the way ;-) ) -- just look at Google. If you'd prefix your keywords there with "google", they'd instead look like commands, complete with special switches of the kind "filetype:", "site:", and - operators, etc. Search engines are already like generic and quite complex commands.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    14. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by fdrake76 · · Score: 1
      fuckthefucker Created 2005-06-20 12:55 - Description - Nominate - http - does nothing

      Hey, I thought my entry was rather useful!

    15. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You can check out ambedo.com which is similar but based on the client side and allows private tags.

    16. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by wsgeek · · Score: 0

      Wait, this was one of the lyrics sung by the Ewoks in the Return of the Jedi.... Remember the song at the end? "Yub Nub.... Da dum de doo" or something

    17. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by greenrd · · Score: 1
      The idea that command lines are inherently difficult to use and unfriendly is not based on any inherent property of command lines, but rather on the existing difficult-to-use and sucky implementations (of which one of the worst in wide use must surely be Oracle's SQLPLUS, but I digress.)

      Let's take a simple problem. User wants to find a site that he recently visited. He can't find it on Google because he doesn't remember anything specific enough with which to find it. He goes to the History in firefox. The interface is crap. He gives up in disgust.

      Alternate scenario: User types in command line "Give me all sites I visited in the last 10 days where the URL has 'fish' or 'carp' in it." This could either be typed in as is, or in a short form like "select sites <10days where url~='fish' or url~='carp'" The browser gives him exactly what he asked for, he finds the site and he's happy.

    18. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make it so that you have to alias the commands into your own namespace, import an entire namespace (in which case you need to beware of conflicts--probably with something "import all but the conflicted ones, put them in the namespace conflicts:originalnamespace:command space, from which we can alias them to something else later")

      Naturally, in any commands you made for others to use, you'd have to use only fully-qualified namespaces, but...

      Errr, now what on earth do we do with these things again? I mean, it sounds cool, and I do use bookmarklets & such, but... ?

      In the mean time, there's always Elza.pl -- it's a damn useful little mini-language for web scripting done in Perl, and it's good with cookies, forms, etc.

    19. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by philipkd · · Score: 1

      I agree that some moderation is necessary, but a fundamental feature of YubNub is that most every command I'd want is already there. Any engineered resistance to creating new search commands would jeopardize the completeness of the YubNub lexicon.

      Moderation should come post-creation, not pre. Get the commands in the system, then moderate.

      With namespaces, I'd have to first seek out other users that have the right ones I need, and then I'd have to memorize their particular namespace-specific commands. In the time it takes to do this, I could have created a Firefox keyword search myself. Nobody would use your namespace keyword besides yourself. YubNub could devise a system where you choose your "trusted buddies" wherein you don't have to type prefixes to use their commands. But then this requires user-management which would interfere with the fluidity of the YubNub system.

      While Firefox already has a command-line feature, YubNub takes it to the next level. I have about six Firefox keyword searches, and I haven't made anymore because I'm lazy. YubNub makes this process much more convenient. First, it saves me time in having to create the searches. Second, I don't have to re-import those Firefox bookmarks for fresh browser installs. And Third, it exposes and provides searches to things I would never made the effort to create, or that I wouldn't have known existed.

      The product as it stands is neither redundant nor ineffective.

    20. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      Firefox already has "quick search" bookmarklets to do this. I just type "gg foobar" into my location bar and it does a google search on that. I don't remember what the default searches are, but I made up a bunch that are useful to me ("deb" does a debian package search, "gg" for google, I've also got "dict" and a bunch of others I don't remember off the top of my head.

      I'm not sure what Yubnub provides aside from basically being a way to share these bookmarklets.

    21. Re:Interesting Concept, but needs moderation by pAnkRat · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but,
      if your user wants this, he should use the google history.
      Sign up, and only use google to "surf the net".

      --
      we need an "-1 Plain wrong" moderation option!
  2. Web apps and the command line by glinden · · Score: 4, Informative

    John Gruber wrote a great essay on this called "The Location Field is the New Command Line". As he put it, "Web apps are just so damned easy to use ... It's all about the fact that you just type the URL and there's your email."

    1. Re:Web apps and the command line by SparafucileMan · · Score: 1

      yes, it's true. as is the search field.

      but then again, they're one and the same. i mean, it's just an input string for some turing-complete language. whether it's search or location or command line or...

    2. Re:Web apps and the command line by smallfries · · Score: 1

      ... or not. Why must the language that they are the inputs for be a turing-complete language?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    3. Re:Web apps and the command line by SparafucileMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      cause otherwise you couldn't do everything?

    4. Re:Web apps and the command line by smallfries · · Score: 1

      So what makes you think that you need a turing complete machine to parse all possible urls?

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  3. iap moon? by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't that also include all Internet Archive Project media featuring someone mooning you?

    I'm scared.

    1. Re:iap moon? by Tune · · Score: 1

      Hmm.
      Like that goatse guy?!?

  4. HTML Get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they meant HTTP?

    1. Re:HTML Get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IHTFP

  5. I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by Tx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't RTFA, but the example in the summary sounds pretty much like quick searches anyway.

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then RTFA

    2. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by Ezdaloth · · Score: 3, Funny

      But now it's a "social commandline", so it'll probably greet you on opening it, and say goodbye when you leave. ;)

    3. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by Tx · · Score: 1

      I just did, in use it's pretty much exactly like quick searches. Only difference is you don't have to set them up yourself. They've even picked many of the same keywords I use for my quick searches.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    4. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by aberson · · Score: 1

      yeah, basically the same thing as IE Quick Search, except you first have to go to a webpage to do it. Unless you make a quicksearch which submits to yubnub...

    5. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by b374 · · Score: 0

      konqueror suports that too... just try typing "imdb moon" or "php readfile" or "cpan bleach" or "gg nothing to see here, move along"... not to mention you can define your own

    6. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they even use the same "%s" that firefox does

      just silly

    7. Re:I call this "Firefox Quick Searches" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firefox uses the same %s as mozilla keyword searches, which in turn is the same %s used by sprintf(3). Maybe it's possible to make their software do weird things if you use something like %g instead.

  6. Just a matter of time by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    # p2p Blahsong.mp3

    1. Re:Just a matter of time by Kwiik · · Score: 1

      Why not just expand url/mrl's for this purpose?

      wget p2p://britney%20spears%20toxic
      mplayer p2p://britney%20spears%20toxic

      why do a new web CLI when we can improve on the current standards? Why not have a decent open source MRL library to implement MRL's like this in to all existing applications, or better yet right in to bash -- make it treat it as a pipe?

      --
      Vehicle Stars used car search is my current project
  7. toolbar by MankyD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This would seem to have more worth if it was done with a plugin/toolbar. Right now, it requires that I switch to my address bar, type in yubnub.org, wait for it to load, switch to the form input, and type in my command.

    Much better if one could skip straight to the command part.

    --
    -dave
    http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
    1. Re:toolbar by thermostat42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      you mean like Konqueror's web shortcuts?

      --
      no comment
    2. Re:toolbar by SYRanger · · Score: 1

      This is built into Firefox as well. Right-click an input-field in e.g. google, and choose "Bookmark this search" and then add a keyword (typically "g"). Voila - a "command line" interface all right. I use google, wikipedia, allmusic and other services this way only. --

    3. Re:toolbar by sas-dot · · Score: 1

      check this page for toolbar, it's already available http://yubnub.org/documentation/describe_installat ion
      I created a cool command called 'cia' quickly. This is for CIA factbook of countries. Most of the countries have two letter abbreviations so 'cia in' will point to India and so on

    4. Re:toolbar by utnow · · Score: 0

      If you use firefox then you can add it to your searchengine bar in the toolbar. Goto http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=yubnu b&submitform=Find+search+plugins and add it to the list.

    5. Re:toolbar by MAdMaxOr · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use YubNub directly!

      Add YubNub to your Firefox address bar by going to about:config and changing keyword.URL to http://yubnub.org/parser/parse?command=

      Plugin/toolbar info here:
      http://www.yubnub.org/documentation/describe_insta llation

    6. Re:toolbar by johansalk · · Score: 1

      You can. See this "To the adventurous: Add YubNub to your Firefox address bar by going to about:config and changing keyword.URL to http://yubnub.org/parser/parse?command= You haven't lived until you've turned the address bar into a full-fledged command line."

    7. Re:toolbar by grifter7 · · Score: 1

      The idea was (if you read his "What Is This Thing" entry (http://jonaquino.blogspot.com/2005/06/yubnub-my-e ntry-for-rails-day-24-hour.html) that it would indeed be similar to FF's keyword feature, but be available from anywhere.

      (It's right there under "2. Why did you make YubNub?")

      So yes, it's slightly harder to use than a browser keyword, but it is more widely available.

    8. Re:toolbar by Teja · · Score: 1

      Konqueror Web Shortcuts huh... well you can also have similar features in Firefox and Opera aswell. You can find instructions as to how you can go about doing that Over here

      --
      - Teja
    9. Re:toolbar by willutah · · Score: 1

      Good point. It would be great if it were integrated into SlickRun.

    10. Re:toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Also like operas. And IEs.
      This is not new...

  8. Ya think people will Gopher it? by StressGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know, bad geek humor, but it does kinda seem like a throwback to gopher.

    --
    A goal is a dream with a deadline
    1. Re:Ya think people will Gopher it? by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .it does kinda seem like a throwback to gopher.

      If you throw out the baby with the bathwater, it doesn't seem such a bad idea to me to do what you can to retrieve the baby.

      KFG

    2. Re:Ya think people will Gopher it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it does kinda seem like a throwback to gopher.

      Shush! It's reto and therefore it's kewl. Call it the PT Commandline.

      Next up: Web searching with punch cards.

      ==================

      OK Slashdot - bite me. Get your AC posting delay working right or kiss all my invaluable AC witticisms goodbye. Taco, its your choice: You have only 24 hours to respond, but can't post your resply until at least 487 hours have passed.

  9. written in Ruby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can never have too much Ruby on Rails, ya know?

    1. Re:written in Ruby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rails is only exciting to RUBY programmers. The rest of us are actually employed and doing real work, thx. So STFU about Rails (and Ruby) for that matter.

  10. AWESOME! by mister_llah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we can have old style Sierra adventures combined with the joy of Internet graphics...

    Whee!

    Command: GET SUBMIT BUTTON
    "Ok! You got it."

    Command: USE SUBMIT BUTTON ON POST
    "You die." ...

    blast, I was never very good at these games.

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
    1. Re:AWESOME! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Get up

      You can't get up. It's dark.

      > Turn on light

      You turn on the light.

      > Get up

      While you were screwing around a big, yellow bulldozer came crashing through your house and killed you.

      Play Again? (Y/N)
      #$@$#$@ing Game! I hate these command line things!
    2. Re:AWESOME! by dstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >use LAMP
      That does nothing. It appears you have IIS.

      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.

      --
      Not every argument requires reduction to absurdity.
    3. Re:AWESOME! by MynockGuano · · Score: 1

      My favorite was always getting brained by a brick from my collapsing house while having a drink in the pub.

    4. Re:AWESOME! by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 4, Funny

      > press button
      I'm sorry, I do not know how to 'press'

      > push button
      I'm sorry, I do not know how to 'push'

      > click button
      I'm sorry, I do not know how to 'click'

      > touch button
      I'm sorry, I do not know how to 'touch'

      > activate button with long stick
      I'm sorry, you do not have a long stick in your inventory

      > exit this piece of shit command line
      I'm sorry, I can't let you do that.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    5. Re:AWESOME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I spent years trying to forget the grue. Now they all flood back. I am sending you my therapy bills!

    6. Re:AWESOME! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

      Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

  11. No, no, no by m50d · · Score: 1

    Please stop trying to make the web do things that there are much better-suited alternatives for. Wouldn't this be so much more usable and efficient as a perl or similar script/library, that you could use not only to get things manually but as part of a greater program?

    --
    I am trolling
  12. location field by aftk2 · · Score: 1

    Like another poster has mentioned, this does indeed sound like an extension of the "location field" as the command line. However, I can imagine some pretty interesting inventions, if you could take the output of one of these commands and, like the typical command line, pipe them into another program or web application. Even better would be web applications that could recognize the piped output for what it was.

    Imagine the following, running as a cronjob:

    "del.icio.us --check | gmail me@home.com 'Cool Links'"

    Or something like that. I lack imagination - I'm sure others could think of interesting ideas as well.

    --
    concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    1. Re:location field by timle · · Score: 1

      how is this different from wget http://del.icio.us/ | mail me@gmail.com -s "Cool Links".

    2. Re:location field by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      You have infringed upon my patented idea, sir. I demand remuneration!

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    3. Re:location field by timle · · Score: 1

      I'm just trying to point out how stupid this is. You can do the same in firefox easily and its not intergrated with the command line its just some cute little site. all the good names with be taken with spam where if I install programs locally I get to control the location (to have 2 programs with the same name) and the path so it finds the right one if I just type "command"

  13. HTML Get? I think not by MC68040 · · Score: 1

    They probably meant HTTP GET, rather than HTML GET.
    (Hyper Text Transport Protocol)
    (Hyper Text Markup Language)
    See the difference?

    1. Re:HTML Get? I think not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTTP = HyperText Transfer Protocol.

    2. Re:HTML Get? I think not by MC68040 · · Score: 1

      My bad for the typo, was in a hurry to get a quick reply in :)

      And as for the other comment; it's not like I went and corrected some gramatical error which at least I think is more pedantic...

    3. Re:HTML Get? I think not by interiot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Oh you lame potty-mouth.

      Confusing HTTP and HTML is like confusing Samba and Microsoft Word, Kazaa and MP3, or BitTorrent and ISOs. Granted, they're slightly related, in that URL syntax is used by both, and HTML includes mechanisms for fairly directly affecting forms-POSTing and file-uploading, but other than that small overlap, they're clearly quite different.

    4. Re:HTML Get? I think not by Stauf · · Score: 1

      It's hardly pedantic. HTTP (HyperText Transport Protocol) is used to move HTML (HyperText Markup Language) around, they are seperate and distinct. Is it pedantic to claim that a cargo ship isn't the same thing as cargo?

      To labour the point further - I can get HTML via FTP and I can get an excecutable binary with HTTP.

  14. Hackers paradise by PriceIke · · Score: 1

    I haven't RTFA either, but am I the only one who sees this being a terrific tool for all kinds of pandemonium on shoddy (i.e. amateur) Web sites?

    --
    It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
  15. Interesting Idea, but it's not going to work... by billnapier · · Score: 1

    It needs some sort of namespaces. An example:

    org.archive.search moon

    To do the moon search in the example. This will solve the problem of people fighting over command names.

    But it still isn't going to work because the number of possible commands is going to grow to such a point that no one will remember what command to use! When I use bash and tab complete on "x", I get 119 possible completions. With this command line, type "com." and you get thousands of possible completions. Maybe it will be sucessful if it never catches on and doesn't have to scale...

  16. More... by flood6 · · Score: 3, Informative
    I didn't realize it when I submitted the story, but yubnub was created by Jon Aquino who recently appeared in /. for his K'nexis Keyboard. Also yubnub is developed in the /. darling Ruby on Rails and was Jon's entry into the 2004 Rails Day.

    You can see some more of Jon's gadgets here.

  17. Speaking of Which by MankyD · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    -dave
    http://millionnumbers.com/ - own the number of your dreams
  18. Expand it! by caudron · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe we could expand it to all parts in the Internet. Then people could do cool stuff like check their mail at the prompt, read newsgroups at the prompt, maybe even read each others blogs at the prompt. Hey, we could call it "telnet" or something really catchy. This is just crazy enough to work, guys! Who's with me?

    I'm starting my CLI-accessable blog right away. I'm gonna call it the "Finger".

    Ain't progress grand?

    --
    -Tom
    1. Re:Expand it! by nozzo · · Score: 1

      heh heh good one. I was thinking just the same thing. In fact, let's go the whole 9 yards and have the ability to render a URL in text from the command line - oh hangon - Lynx!

    2. Re:Expand it! by BurntNickel · · Score: 1

      Just think of the power you'd have if you wrapped a GUI around it!

      --
      And the knowledge that they fear is a weapon to be used against them...
  19. Pedantic by interiot · · Score: 1

    Not to be pedantic, but the GET request belongs to HTTP, not to HTML. HTML is a fixed file format that can be transported across any medium, including NFS/FTP/SMB. HTTP is a transport protocol that allows some amount of negotiation between file and server, and it's possible to use completely separately from HTML in some cases.

  20. this thing really really sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no i am not kidding

  21. A Ruby On Rails site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see if the framework lives up to the hype.

    Will it survive a slashdotting ?

  22. someone's gotta try THIS! by MrNally · · Score: 2, Funny


    www.*> rm -rf /*

    1. Re:someone's gotta try THIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean "www.* | rm -rf /*"

      ">" would pipe the output of www.* to a FILE rm, not actually run the command to delete everything in /

    2. Re:someone's gotta try THIS! by tolan-b · · Score: 1

      rm -rf http:///

      assuming http is mounted as a writeable filesystem.

      i had a sweater printed with this on it.. i don't like html much ;)

  23. REGEX search by joeljkp · · Score: 1

    I want a REGEX web search. Can't think of an example off the top of my head, but there have been many times that I've wanted one for extra control.

    --
    WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    1. Re:REGEX search by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      For web searching, I would be happy for quotes to make punctuation a part of the search string in google, instead of the bizzare way they handle puncuation now.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:REGEX search by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      its not really that feasible
      but
      http://greg.swerdfeger.com/index.shtml

      I made a small perl script to do this for me.
      you feed in a search term and the engine Gets Results from google, then parces the Cache or webpage for a RegEx....

      Prob 1. its slow cause it works via proxy
      Prob 2. its not a true ranking via RegEx.
      Ranks come via google then we search the Google page for Reg Exp

      cheers

      --
      --meh--
    3. Re:REGEX search by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have wanted google to use my quoted strings exactly for a while now. Such a simple thing I can't understand why they do it that way. I would also love a regex search for the web.

  24. XMLTerm by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    The best version of this concept that I saw was XMLTerm. It's a graphical CLI, in a web page. It's ideally suited to be a CLI for websites, as well as a website implementing a CLI. It was ahead of its time, and went down the drain when the bubble popped. On purely "zeitgeist" problems - it appears to be technically sound. If there's interest, and effort, in this kind of app now, it will be much better to pick up this orphaned OSS project, than to reinvent it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  25. 1st Command by geeper · · Score: 0

    c:> GET ALL P0RN

    --
    Error reading device 'Signature'. (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?
  26. Command Line Interface by No+Such+Agency · · Score: 1

    No, the Location Field would only be the new CL, if people bragged about using it, and whined that people who DON'T use it "don't understand how their computers work, did you know some users can barely write a simple device driver!"

    --
    Freedom: "I won't!"
    1. Re:Command Line Interface by XMyth · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? You haven't ever seen (I see this DAILY almost) someone type a URL into the MSN/Yahoo/AOL search box?? ::SMACK::

      Idiots!

    2. Re:Command Line Interface by timle · · Score: 1

      Why is that such an idiot thing to do. Shouldn't the site with the highest revelence be the site itself. So if I type www.slashdot.org into google and hit I'm Feeling Lucky I would get slashdot - though I'd go through google first to get there.

    3. Re:Command Line Interface by XMyth · · Score: 0

      Well, the idiots exclamation was an exaggeration, but it still doesn't make sense to do it. It just adds an extra step and the potential for screw ups.

      It just makes more sense to type the address in the location bar. I mean, if you don't KNOW the address but just know part of the name, then yea...but if you're typing www.slashdot.org into Google's search box to get to www.slashdot.org then something is wrong.

    4. Re:Command Line Interface by timle · · Score: 1

      just as wrong as typing g foobar into this dumb site to have it do a google search on foobar - I could have typed that directly into the location bar on directly into google itself.

    5. Re:Command Line Interface by XMyth · · Score: 1

      No argument there.

    6. Re:Command Line Interface by singleantler · · Score: 1

      If you have Google as your home page, it automatically puts focus to the search box.

      Now consider most people can't touch type and so don't look at the screen when they're typing in 'www.bbc.co.uk' or whatever. When they look up and realise what's happened they may as well just press return and get the results back, the only one of which is the site they want, then click on that. Otherwise they have to click in the location/address bar and re-type it, or cut and paste it up there (which many of the same people won't realise you can do from the search box.)

      I would also argue that as the person using the interface is getting what they want, it doesn't matter that they typed a URL in to the search box instead of the location bar. Surely good software is about helping the user get what they want, even if how they do it could have been done slightly more quickly if they'd used a different interface element.

      --
      "What if they're using IE?" "I've dumbed Mozilla down to cope with it." - BOFH
    7. Re:Command Line Interface by XMyth · · Score: 1

      Now consider most people can't touch type and so don't look at the screen when they're typing in 'www.bbc.co.uk' or whatever. When they look up and realise what's happened they may as well just press return and get the results back, the only one of which is the site they want, then click on that. Otherwise they have to click in the location/address bar and re-type it, or cut and paste it up there (which many of the same people won't realise you can do from the search box.)


      Point taken. If they've lost focus and are typing steadily into the search box without knowing, then fine. I was referring to (though I didn't say this) the people who focus the search box and type in the full address (well, with or without the http:/// since it's assumed for most URLs anyways). They don't understand how it works...I forget what my original point was, but either way....doing that isn't necessary and adds an extra step (potentially an incorrect one depending on the search engine).
    8. Re:Command Line Interface by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      If you're typing www.slashdot.org into anywhere to get to Slashdot, something is wrong. You only need to type slashdot.org - check the link in the upper-left corner.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
  27. social by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is "social" the new overused buzzword of the week?

    1. Re:social by b374 · · Score: 0

      of the week??? more like of the last 5000yrs!

  28. Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I for one welcome our new CLI web overlords...

    Now that that's been taken care of, I'd like to say that this is an interesting idea. As a sysadmin I spend a lot of time in a terminal and though this has not been integrated into the terminal yet, the idea of being able to run a web search through a command line interface makes me happy.

    I can just imagine:

    $ google -5 "firefox ftp download"

    1. Index of /pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases
    ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/

    2. Index of /pub/mozilla.org/firefox
    ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/

    3. mozdev.org - fireftp: index
    fireftp.mozdev.org/

    4. schestowitz.com : Firefox FTP Client
    schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/ 2005/05/08/firefox-ftp-client/

    5. Neil's World - FTP Uploads in Firefox
    www.neilturner.me.uk/2004/ Sep/01/ftp_uploads_in_firefox.html

    $ ftp ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/

    ...

    Now what would be even cooler: You know the console from all the first person shooter games like Quake and Half-Life. Really simple, just hit Tilda and it slides down the top third of the screen. The quake 3 one even has some nifty open GL moving background. Anyway, my point is, how come to get a console in Windows I have to hit WIN+R, "CMD", [Enter]. Not fair. I've searched near and far and havent found any such console for Windows or Linux.

    If a fellow slashdotter could point me in the right direction I would greatly apreciate it. I know this is a good idea, and I know I'm not the only one who would love such a program. It would be so nice to simply hit ~, run your ipconfig command, then ~ again and go back to what you were doing.

    Aardwolf
    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    1. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ALT+W+S in konqueror splits the browser window and gives you a terminal in the lower half.

      It's a little more impressive than it sounds, as there are little tricks like when browsing the local filesystem, clicking on a folder makes the terminal cd to the new directory.

    2. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That seems like a nice hack in theory. Just bind a shortcut key - say [ctrl-`] to pop up a Shell Konsole terminal window or whatever.

      What would make it funky then is if it scrolled onto the screen a la Q3A.

      #\callvote setca pro-q3dm6
      #\pmove_fixed 1
      #\set name ^1^^0*
      #\snaps 100
      #\rate 25000
      #\cl_maxpackets 100
      #./install.sh

    3. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by jerald_hams · · Score: 1

      I heartily second this idea.

      If there were a quake-console style web shell, which worked as a layer over bash or zsh it would greatly simplify a lot of my daily tasks.

      Some of the comments here have stated that the web is too easy to require a shell. I totally disagree. Every task I want to do requires some typing, a click or two and page loads. While individually these take up just a few seconds, they add up to eat lots of my time.

      I'd much rather type "weather 61923" into a shell than "www.weather.com" (wait for load) "61923" (ENTER). It's just faster.

      Also imagine YubNub combined with an object oriented shell such as MS's monad...

      "g 'rocket' | list_objects('url') | mailto(someaddr@server.com)"

      Do a google search, extract all the urls from the search results, email the list of the urls to some address.

      It would be fantastic.

      -Alex

    4. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This one's easy in KDE (if you want it is another matter entirely as it effectively makes ~ key generally unusable). Go to menu K -> System -> Configuration -> KDE -> Accessibility -> Keyboard Shortcuts. Then select second tab at the top "Command Scortcuts", select your favourite terminal and set it's shortcut as ~ (I can't even write the damned reverse apostrophe for now :))

    5. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by 10scjed · · Score: 1

      I had done this once using wmctrl to move, shade windows around, binding CTRL~ in xfce to a script i wrote either brought up the terminal window or shaded and moved it back down below my panel. check either oreilly for a short article on wmctrl: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/6014

      --
      --10scjed IANAL,AFAIK
    6. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Now if only there were something similar for windows because I know I'll go over to my server2003 boxes and hit CTRL+~ and just sit there for a second waiting, wondering what the @%#$ is wrong with this MS box, then realize the pebkac.

      I've hacked together ctrl-alt-c to open CMD which is located at the top of the screen, then I close it with alt+space, c, but its not the same.

      Anyone?

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    7. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 3, Informative

      how come to get a console in Windows I have to hit WIN+R, "CMD", [Enter].

      Well, you could always set up a keyboard shortcut that launched CMD.EXE -- I've got mine mapped to CTRL-ALT-S. I also keep shortcut icons to my Windows and Cygwin shells in the Quick Launch dock, for more easy access.

      The more important aspect of your feature request, though, is to make the shell itself dockable: the command line stays out of the way, you call it up only for as long as you need it, and then it hides itself again. I'd like to see someone implement such a feature, too.

    8. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by l3v1 · · Score: 1

      'd like to say that this is an interesting idea. As a sysadmin I spen

      As a sysadmin, you should know better. Back in the days we just used lynx ftpsearch.ntnu.no to search for files. Twas nice. Now the new generation despises the cli, then reinvetns the wheel by doing some bastardized mockup of a never-to-be cli which one uses thourhg browsers... hell of a day. I always welcome bright new ideas that enhance everyday people's computer and web experience. This, I find absolutely useless, a way of spreading useless hundreds of bad and good-for-nothing commands that nobody ever will use for anything. This is worse than a bad joke. Troll me if you want, that can't change my opinion.

      --
      I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
    9. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lynx -dump http://www.google.com/search?q=firefox+ftp+downloa d | head

      thats almost it.... pipe it through a sed regexp replace to remove the garbage and you have it...

    10. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Right on, a timeout period would be really nice, but I'm sure it could be annoying at some times to. Maybe if it became 50% transparent before completely disapearing it would be nice, then if you were writing something down from the console and it started to go you could hit a key to keep it up. who knows. Anyway, I really really want this and CTRL-ALT-S just isnt the same and you all know it.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    11. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      not dispising the cli, started on it, will end on it. not trying to bastardize the cli, just bling it up a bit al la quake 3.

      In quake 3 I would get shot dead, realize it was because of some lag problem, hit tilda and throw a command at it, hit tilda again, and get back to gaming like it never happened.

      Thats what I use the console for, something up, I need to run a few commands, fix the problem, and get back to work.

      And no, I'm not a big fan of this social keyword thingy either, it seems like a lame fad that'll just end up with useless AOL'ish keywords that nobody ever uses because its been spammed to death and takes to long to use.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    12. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      to get a console in Windows I have to hit WIN+R, "CMD", [Enter].


      hmm... someone actually uses that key? personally, i hit [Ctrl],[Esc],[R],CMD,[Enter]


      7 individual keystrokes. not as quick as just hitting the tilda [~], but it takes me less than 1 sec. to get a command prompt, and doesn't limit my ability to type things like:


      < lame example > ~sorta` < /lame example >

    13. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      surfraw already does this. Comes with many distros packagins systems.

      google from the console using your fav browser.

    14. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More information:

      Without any third party addons, just look for your command prompt shortcut in the start menu, right click, properties, click on the keyboard shrotcut box and then put in your shortcut. It seems to require a ctrl-alt shortcut, to avoid interfering with apps I guess. You can map it to ctrl-alt-`

      When you're done with it, dont close it, hit alt-space,n (minimize), or alt-tab. When you next hit ctrl-alt-`, it'll restore this window rather than creating a new prompt.

      It works well enough, but it takes more keystrokes than you wanted. I don't know if this is good or bad.

      You could probably find third party addons for simpler shortcuts, or if you have extra "internet" buttons in your keyboard, configure them to call up/dismiss a prompt.

    15. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by technix4beos · · Score: 1
      We've had a command line version of Google queries in BeOS/Haiku for some time now.

      François Revol coded up what he called "Google File System" (this was back in dec/2004) and hooked it into BeOS queries that return NetPositive bookmarks.

      As for hitting the tilde key, that is also possible with Spicy Keys, which allows one to map any key combination to cli scripts, binaries, etc.

      Just some of the neat things one can do with Haiku/BeOS these days.

      --
      user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
    16. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by aardwolf204 · · Score: 2, Informative

      yeah, the win key is useful.

      Win +

      R, run
      M, minimize all windows
      D, show desktop (toggle)
      E, explorer

      There are some more but those are what I use. And its funny that you mention ctrl+esc because before I had a windows keyboard (Back in 1995), and even for some time after I got a winkeyboard, I would use CTRL+Esc alt the time. Weird how shortcut habbits can change.

      Thats my problem, I'm a keyboard shortcut whore because I started in DOS and am not a big fan of windows so whenever I can acomplish something in keystrokes instead of the kludgy mouse I will.

      PS. I just shift-tabbed back to add this PS, noting that i subcounciously knew it was three tabs to the submit button. there's my evidence.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    17. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Deviant+Q · · Score: 1

      Well... try creating a shortcut to cmd.exe on your start menu or desktop, then assigned it a keyboard shortcut. You'd still have to exit manually, but it helps a bit.

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    18. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple Mac OS X Tiger's Dashboard feature comes close to providing what you're looking for. I believe there's a command line widget that can be used.

    19. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by UbuWu · · Score: 2, Informative

      It exists for linux: Tilda http://tilda.sourceforge.net/ And also you could setup eterm in almost anyway you want... Don't know about Windows...

    20. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with the example that comes with Expect? It's probably already on your machine.

    21. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by martian67 · · Score: 1

      http://www.nemohackers.org/kuake.php/

      I think this is exactly the thing you were looking for, i use it and its GREAT, a push of the tilda key and ive got my console :D

    22. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by suttree.com · · Score: 1
    23. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by nege · · Score: 1

      Mac OS X could do it if someone creates a Terminal widget - so far I have not found one. All you would have to do is hit F12 - and there is your terminal, pulled up in lovely Mac OSX fashion. ;)

    24. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by creysoft · · Score: 1
      --
      Formerly GNU/Anonymous Coward. This message has been determined to cause cancer in laboratory animals.
    25. Re:Seems kinda fadish, but I'll bite by Black+Acid · · Score: 1

      You may be able to use Scancode Map in the Registry to remap ~ (or even better, `) to another scancode that you could assign to a small script which opens/closes cmd.

  29. it's already being abused... by bnitsua · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if you do an ls of available commands, a lot of the commands are advertisements for blogs.

  30. personally i would by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    $ php Blahsong.mp3

    i never p2p as root

    ps, shove the okmmrfj up your ass taco

  31. Do this in your own browser instead... by Otto · · Score: 3, Informative

    The only advantage of this is that it's collaborative... and as other users have pointed out, quite a lot of the commands on the site are crap and need moderation of some sort.

    But your browser has this built in already.

    -If you use IE, you can set up these type of search shortcuts using TweakUI.
    -If you use Firefox/Mozilla, you can create bookmarks that implement these sort of shortcuts. There's some examples in your bookmarks menu when you first install Firefox, just look at those for how to do it.

    In both cases, after creating them, you can just type "shortcut search terms" in the address to make it do that "search". Doesn't have to be a search of course, it can be any kind of HTTP GET that you want. I have several defined..
    -g for quick googling
    -imdb for movie lookups
    -imdbq for movie quote lookups
    -snpp to search the simpsons archives..
    -And so on. ;)

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Do this in your own browser instead... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't looked a lot but I found this one
      http://yubnub.org/kernel/man?args=dotcom
      which is really stupid...

      Connecting to the website and typing 'dotcom whatever' + Return is far longer than typing whatever in your address bar and validating by Control+Return

      Again, your browser can do what the site does, and even better. (for this example, you can even choose between .com, .org, .net with one finger)

      T.

  32. Railsday by Harper · · Score: 1

    Yubnub was a railsday entry. Pretty neat what can be done in mostly one day.

    It will be interesting how rails handles under the slashdot load.

    --
    Producing satire is kind of hopeless because of the literacy rate of the American public. - Frank Zappa
  33. YubNub? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yub nub, eee chop yub nub,
    toe meet toe pee chee keene, g'noop dock fling oh ah.
    Yah wah, eee chop yah wah,
    toe meet toe pee chee keene, g'noop dock fling oh ah
    Coat ee chah tu yub nub,
    Coat ee chah tu yah wah,
    Coat ee chah tu glo wah.
    allay loo ta nuv
    Glo wah, eee chop glo wah, ya glo wah pee chu nee foam,
    ah toot dee awe goon daa.
    Coat ee cha tu goo (Yub nub!)
    coat ee cha tu doo (Yah wah!)
    coat ee cha tu too (ya chaa!)
    allay loo tu nuv (3 times)
    Glo wah, eee chop glo wah.
    Ya glow wah pee chu nee foam,
    ah toot dee awe goon daa
    allay loo tu nuv.

    1. Re:YubNub? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Celebrate the love!

    2. Re:YubNub? by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Jabba the Hutt, is that you?

  34. why be subject to others' ideas... by josephbanks · · Score: 1

    of what to call the commands and what they should perform when moz/firefox already allows the same thing via bookmark keywords? maybe i'm misunderstanding the point but this just seems like an interesting idea that is doomed to be a disaster. i have a hard time seeing where it could be useful. by the time i go to this site, look for a command, and figure out just how to use it, i could have easily made my own powerful bookmark with a name *i* invented for it, which makes sense to me and is three letters long (it won't take long for short names to be impossible to score in this thing).

  35. YubNub - Ewok speak? by richardoz · · Score: 1

    It sounds like something an Ewok would say.

    --
    All the worlds indeed a .sig, and we are mearly players..
    1. Re:YubNub - Ewok speak? by nmx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, "yub nub" is Ewok for "freedom."

      --
      "Well kids, you tried your best, and you failed. The lesson is, never try."
  36. we have all this, don't we? by prgrmr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Lynx, archie, veronica, gopher, ping, traceroute, whois, nslookup... sound familiar to anyone else?

    1. Re:we have all this, don't we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Nothing like reinventing 20+ year old technology and wasting a GUI on it!

    2. Re:we have all this, don't we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't actually tried the app, have you? It shows.

    3. Re:we have all this, don't we? by ivanmarsh · · Score: 1

      No kidding...
      Once again something that came from the *nix world is suddenly new technology.

  37. from doing an "ls" by Fr05t · · Score: 1

    "fuckthefucker

    Created 2005-06-20 12:55 - Description - Nominate - http"

    Wow I don't remember seeing that command anywhere before. Maybe having some kind of moderation system to filter out the crap commands and ban websites for abuse? Really though I don't see my Mom using a command line - typing a word, then pointing and clicking is about the total amount of effort the average joe/janes is willing to commit to computing.

  38. Filter by sammyo · · Score: 1

    They need a 'filter the stupid stuff' applied real quick or this will be relegated to the dustbin of the web. Really, the balance between 'needs clever users' vs results is too skewed.

    Does kinda make sense, I just saw a 'VC blog' with the question: 'is the bubble back'.

    Dream on.

    Buy tulips.

  39. this is different from mozilla keywords how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I can type

    imdb Terminator

    into my mozilla address bar and it does an search on imdb.org for terminator. or

    dict antidisestablishmentarianism

    and it searches on dictionary.com for "antidisestablishmentarianism"

    the only advantage to this that I can see is that it has addresses that I might not have known about. But there are probably better ways of going about this than making a new web page. Perhaps a blog or plugin system for picking which ones you want mozilla to use.

    (see http://www.mozilla.org/docs/end-user/keywords.html for how to use moz keywords)

  40. Interesting - needs moderation though by improfane · · Score: 0

    Interesting, I just made one for GRC port probing: http://www.yubnub.org/kernel/man?args=grcscan

    --
    Slashdot needs Geekcode | Can anyone recommend any good SCIFI? My tastes: Foundation, Startide Rising, CITY, Ringworld,
  41. other then as a social experiment... by rogabean · · Score: 1

    I can't find a single practical use for this. Nor do I find it very intuitive at all. Call me *old fashioned* but things were fine the way they were.

    If you need me I'll be over at this sane website...

    google.com

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  42. Didn't Lucas fix this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought they got rid of the YubNub music at the end of Jedi. Thank goodness too!

  43. easier with firefox | opera by ^Z · · Score: 5, Informative

    In FF, you can have bookmarks like this: http://livejournal.com/~%25s/ Give it a keyword (say, 'lj'), type in the URL line: lj someusername and someusername's livejournal opens. This is the simplest example. I have several more sophisticated; this mostly obviates the FF search box. And all this with a *very* simple syntax that only allows substitution of one string. Imagine something a bit more powerful in that place.

    --

    Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes

    1. Re:easier with firefox | opera by ExKoopaTroopa · · Score: 1

      I use http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search =%25s&go=Go with wiki as keyword, so I can "wiki slashdot" or better, with phpmyadmin, "pma dbname"

      --
      Don't Tell Me What I Can't Do!
  44. front end for web apps by MattW · · Score: 1

    I suppose it shouldn't be a surprise that this is going on. Many have long preferred the CLI for interacting with applications. The web is undergoing a change from a medium for simply displaying information and become more of a protocol for client/server web applications. Is it any wonder that as the universe of web apps grows, that people want CLI utilities to communicate with them?

    It's nothing new. We've been running finger, whois, nslookup and so on from the CLI for ages; these are utilities that could just as easily run over the web. (As opposed to say, IRC, which is hurt by the lack of statefulness)

    I suppose this is yet another reason why web applications should carefully separate their presentation from other logic, since they may be called upon to present data to entirely different clients in the future if this became more common.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Konqueror has this by infolib · · Score: 3, Informative
    With support for Google, Wikipedia, Leo german dictionary, CPAN and many others. Just type wiki: whatever in the address bar to search Wikipedia for "whatever". I went from knowing jack about these "web shortcuts" to creating my own in five minutes. (Just copy and modify existing ones)

    Oh, and you can also use the address bar to ssh for your files (fish:) or get the images of your camera (digikam:). Bow to the power of the KIOslave framework!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  47. Rails by Tobias+Luetke · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think its worth mentioning that YubNub was created for the RailsDay. A one day Ruby on Rails coding contest which was featured in the developer section of slashdot a week or so ago.
    Its not the pinnacle of complexity but its still amazing what you can do in just a day. Hats off the the programmer.

  48. Lynx by sugarmotor · · Score: 1

    This is called lynx. I did this ten years ago. (Time flies)

    Try this

    alias YubNub lynx

    Stephan

    --
    http://stephan.sugarmotor.org
  49. The only one you'll ever use. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "i get me porn"

  50. Similar site by tpengster · · Score: 1

    Fusica.com has a similar feature under expert search except that it is not collaborative.

  51. Firefox Search Engine by crashcodesdotcom · · Score: 1

    FYI, there is a firefox search engine plugin for this too. http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=yubnu b&submitform=Find+search+plugins/

  52. Slashdot command by qazwsxqazwsx90 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Unfortunately the slashdot command only searches slashdot. It would be much more accurate if this command would bring nearly any web server to a screeching halt.

  53. Mozilla Custom Keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is pretty much useless if you use Mozilla/Firefox, where using Custom Keywords, your Navigation bar becomes your command line.

    I had been collecting my favorite keywords on my Custom Keyword Wiki

    The wiki is now closed due to a lost battle against spammers, but as far as I have seen this is the biggest list of custom keywords available, so if anyone wants to pick up the project they are more than welcome. Email to awormus(a)gmail.com.

  54. Built into Firefox by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just bookmark any page that is from a GET query. E.g. an IMDB search for "Batman Begins" gives you this:

    http://www.imdb.com/Find?select=All&for=batman%20b egins

    Modify the properties of the bookmark, replacing "batman%20begins" with %s. This is a placeholder.

    Give the bookmark a keyword, such as "imdb."

    Now you can type "imdb X" in the url bar in firefox, hit enter, and it will do a search for whatever you enter for "X." Much easier than using yubnub.org.

    I have bookmark searches setup for all kinds of stuff. Whois, nslookup, tracert, imdb, dictionary, gg (google groups), gi (google image), gm (google maps), yyp (Yahoo Yellow Pages), the list goes on and on. Any URL that accepts query words will work for you.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    1. Re:Built into Firefox by SYRanger · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's actually even better than this manual %s-approach. Right-click on an input-field prior to search, and "bookmark this search" and add a keyword to it. This manual %s-process was integrated like this since 1.0 I think, but still works though.

    2. Re:Built into Firefox by sas-dot · · Score: 1

      Its cool trick, like you said, it's built in firefox. But i think YubNub idea is to share the bookmark with many. What if i want to search from a machine, which is not bookmarked by me.

    3. Re:Built into Firefox by wamatt · · Score: 1

      I use Firefox shortcuts for everything too. Yubnub is a gimmick I reckon because not everyone agrees on which shortcuts should go where.

      Even around the office we all use FF shortcuts with slightly different (personalised) keywords.

      Also its faster and more convenient in FF because its one less TCP call.

  55. slashdot by bodester17 · · Score: 3, Funny

    they should add a command where you can slashdot a site at will. Let the melting of servers begin!!

  56. Interesting Comand? by bloko · · Score: 0

    Did anyone do a ls on yubnub.org and realise that "vagsmell" was a command?..

    --
    I gave the bat commader a high five.
  57. This is gonna make my life a LOT easier by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 2, Funny


    <BODY BGCOLOR="#000000" text="#FFFFFF">
    <FONT face="sans-serif">C:\><BLINK>_</BLINK></FONT>
    </BODY>
    </HTML>

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  58. Expand more by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I am going to expand on your CLI-accessible blog to only provide the blogs from the middle of the page.

    I will call it the "Middle Finger".

  59. A shortcut for GETs? by shish · · Score: 1

    We already have short GETs -- add a firefox bookmark with a %s in the url, give it a keyword, then see as you can type "keyword arg" into the address bar and have it expanded. Now we just need web services to come up with sensible arg names~

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  60. Konqueror has done this for years by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 4, Informative

    The K desktop environment has things called "KIOslaves" which recognize certain pseudo-protocols on the Konqueror location bar (and other places).

    Internet examples include "deb:" for Debian package searches, "rf:" for rpmfind, "gg:" for Google, "ggl:" for Google-I-feel-lucky, and "rfc:" for getting RFC text from the IETF website, and "wp:" for Wikipedia. There are lots of these.

    Non-internet examples include "man:" for viewing man pages, and "info:" for viewing those otherwise horrible GNU info pages.

    --
    2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    1. Re:Konqueror has done this for years by Sykil · · Score: 1

      Firefox also does this; they're called "quicksearches" (by Firefox, that is). And, you can define your own by right clicking the input field and clicking "Add keyword for this search...".

      They have few default ones, though.

  61. Exactly correct by Otto · · Score: 1
    If you read his blog entry here: http://jonaquino.blogspot.com/2005/06/yubnub-my-en try-for-rails-day-24-hour.html

    3. What's up with the name "YubNub", anyway?

    I remember hearing this word as a kid, watching one of the Star Wars movies. Evidently it means "Hooray" in the Ewok language.
    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  62. Does it burn when you type? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    But now it's a "social commandline", so it'll probably greet you on opening it, and say goodbye when you leave. ;)

    And give you a virus if you're not careful.

  63. Dave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  64. ohhh by mansoft · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I could not resist.

    Just try the "recursive" command :)

    --

    Engage!

    1. Re:ohhh by runep · · Score: 1

      What is the name of this recursive command that you mentioned?

  65. for your information by Phybersyk0 · · Score: 1

    Yub Nub means "Freedom" in Ewokese.

    yes.

    fucking ewoks.

    yes.

    I'm lame.

    (former Official Star Wars Fan Club member 1983-1985)

  66. offtopic therefore AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get a linux console in the same style as the quake console, hit ctrl+alt+f1 (or most of the other function keys). You have to log in the first time you use it.

    For windows you can put an icon in the quick launch bar instead of going through the run menu.

    $ lynx "http://www.google.com/search?q=firefox+ftp+downlo ad"

    or maybe links instead of lynx depending on your system. You can use a script to make that a little easier to type, and you can download in lynx so you don't need to use a seperate ftp client.

    p.s. Sysadmin? If you can get a job without knowing this stuff then I'm set for life! Yay!

    1. Re:offtopic therefore AC by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Your missing the point. Of course I can get a terminal but hitting 3 odd keys, or use lynx, but thats not what I'm looking for. I would love to hit ~, or even ctrl-~ and have a semi-transparent console scroll down from the top of the screen al-la quake 3.

      And the guy that said "weather 98715" totally got the idea. I'd probably just map weather %1 to "google weather" %1 as I like their weather service.

      I'm still upset that I've searched sourceforge and never found anything similar I could even start to hack together.

      Oh, and putting a CMD icon in the quick task tray is so far off. My fingers are alreay on the keyboard. I use WIN+R, cmd, enter just for that reason.

      I'm not sure but I think I might have retrolled.

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
    2. Re:offtopic therefore AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fvwm can do this.

    3. Re:offtopic therefore AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working with guys who use Macs all the time...I love the new feature in Tiger where you just press one key and you can pull up a screen that has all these widgets to pull up weather, traffic, and almost anything else you want quickly and simply.

    4. Re:offtopic therefore AC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what happens when you're typing and you need to type the ~ character?

  67. The Evolution of a Programmer by so+sue+mee · · Score: 1

    High School/Jr.High 10 PRINT "HELLO WORLD" 20 END First year in College program Hello(input, output) begin writeln('Hello World') end. Senior year in College (defun hello (print (cons 'Hello (list 'World)))) New professional #include void main(void) { char *message[] = {"Hello ", "World"}; int i; for(i = 0; i #include class string { private: int size; char *ptr; public: string() : size(0), ptr(new char('\0')) {} string(const string &s) : size(s.size) { ptr = new char[size + 1]; strcpy(ptr, s.ptr); } ~string() { delete [] ptr; } friend ostream &operator ); importheader(); importheader(); importheader("pshlo.h"); importheader("shlo.hxx"); importheader("mycls.hxx"); // needed typelibs importlib("actimp.tlb"); importlib("actexp.tlb"); importlib("thlo.tlb"); [ uuid(2573F891-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820), aggregatable ] coclass CHello { cotype THello; }; }; #include "ipfix.hxx" extern HANDLE hEvent; class CHello : public CHelloBase { public: IPFIX(CLSID_CHello); CHello(IUnknown *pUnk); ~CHello(); HRESULT __stdcall PrintSz(LPWSTR pwszString); private: static int cObjRef; }; #include #include #include #include #include "thlo.h" #include "pshlo.h" #include "shlo.hxx" #include "mycls.hxx" int CHello::cObjRef = 0; CHello::CHello(IUnknown *pUnk) : CHelloBase(pUnk) { cObjRef++; return; } HRESULT __stdcall CHello::PrintSz(LPWSTR pwszString) { printf("%ws\n", pwszString); return(ResultFromScode(S_OK)); } CHello::~CHello(void) { // when the object count goes to zero, stop the server cObjRef--; if( cObjRef == 0 ) PulseEvent(hEvent); return; } #include #include #include "pshlo.h" #include "shlo.hxx" #include "mycls.hxx" HANDLE hEvent; int _cdecl main( int argc, char * argv[] ) { ULONG ulRef; DWORD dwRegistration; CHelloCF *pCF = new CHelloCF(); hEvent = CreateEvent(NULL, FALSE, FALSE, NULL); // Initialize the OLE libraries CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED); CoRegisterClassObject(CLSID_CHello, pCF, CLSCTX_LOCAL_SERVER, REGCLS_MULTIPLEUSE, &dwRegistration); // wait on an event to stop WaitForSingleObject(hEvent, INFINITE); // revoke and release the class object CoRevokeClassObject(dwRegistration); ulRef = pCF->Release(); // Tell OLE we are going away. CoUninitialize(); return(0); } extern CLSID CLSID_CHello; extern UUID LIBID_CHelloLib; CLSID CLSID_CHello = { /* 2573F891-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820 */ 0x2573F891, 0xCFEE, 0x101A, { 0x9A, 0x9F, 0x00, 0xAA, 0x00, 0x34, 0x28, 0x20 } }; UUID LIBID_CHelloLib = { /* 2573F890-CFEE-101A-9A9F-00AA00342820 */ 0x2573F890, 0xCFEE, 0x101A, { 0x9A, 0x9F, 0x00, 0xAA, 0x00, 0x34, 0x28, 0x20 } }; #include #include #include #include #include #include "pshlo.h" #include "shlo.hxx" #include "clsid.h" int _cdecl main( int argc, char * argv[] ) { HRESULT hRslt; IHello *pHello; ULONG ulCnt; IMoniker * pmk; WCHAR wcsT[_MAX_PATH]; WCHAR wcsPath[2 * _MAX_PATH]; // get object path wcsPath[0] = '\0'; wcsT[0] = '\0'; if( argc > 1) { mbstowcs(wcsPath, argv[1], strlen(argv[1]) + 1); wcsupr(wcsPath); } else { fprintf(stderr, "Object path must be specified\n"); return(1); } // get print string if(argc > 2) mbstowcs(wcsT, argv[2], strlen(argv[2]) + 1); else wcscpy(wcsT, L"Hello World"); printf("Linking to object %ws\n", wcsPath); printf("Text String %ws\n", wcsT); // Initialize the OLE libraries hRslt = CoInitializeEx(NULL, COINIT_MULTITHREADED); if(SUCCEEDED(hRslt)) { hRslt = CreateFileMoniker(wcsPath, &pmk); if(SUCCEEDED(hRslt)) hRslt = BindMoniker(pmk, 0, IID_IHello, (void **)&pHello); if(SUCCEEDED(hRslt)) { // print a string out pHello->PrintSz(wcsT); Sleep(2000); ulCnt = pHello->

  68. Keyword Bookmarklets by SuperDuh · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought of when I read the title was keyword bookmarklets:
    http://www.squarefree.com/bookmarklets/keywords.ht ml

    One of those things that seems could be made more useful with some "Ajax" here and there.

  69. Along these lines by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Vaguely along these lines, I've had a desire for a while for screen scraping type work. There are small bits of info I want to grab from multiple web pages and combine them into a single page. Further complicating the issue, there may be POSTDATA and cookie files I need to provide, possibly with different versions of a single cookie file.

    Is this possible without full-on progamming?

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  70. Porn by outriding9800 · · Score: 1

    So does this mean pics come up in asci ?

    1. Re:Porn by Zone-MR · · Score: 1

      Sure :p

      > search -url:www.asciipr0n.com -q 8===D d-:

  71. WhiskyTangoFoxtrot entry #11,349... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    You are in a dark place. You are likely to be eaten by a spammer.

    I am totally failing to see the point of this except for people who want to dare a shave from Occam's Razor and introduce more chance of user input error, waste time getting away from what average users want and need, and just generally engage in more geekery.

    Wouldn't Lynx be easier?

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  72. Interface Design by Committee by e2d2 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, because "Interface Design by Committee" has worked so well in the past. One only needs to look at the W3C to see how the interface design by committee leads to a cluster fuck. Now throw into the committee every person that has an internet connection.

    I'll wait for the sequel.

  73. Sounds like a ten-minute Perl script... by jonadab · · Score: 1

    almost as if somebody slapped a CLI onto WWW::Mechanize.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  74. Good idea! Only - too bad it's already functional by KZigurs · · Score: 1

    Take a look at our good'ol friend Google:

    Take a look at operators: http://www.google.com/help/features.html

  75. better way by cmorgan47 · · Score: 1

    i've been doing this forever in the form of ridiculously small shell scripts which launch firefox and plug command line args into a url. it works better as i can use the term window that i already have open instead of launching a browser, finding a site, figuring out the command.....
    eg weather -h 48237 finds my local weather by the hour

    --
    no i have not shot my gun in the air and gone 'Ahh!'
  76. Could be interesting by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1
    A command line for the web, eh?

    rm -r microsoft.com

    (oh please oh please oh please...)

    --
    Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  77. jonkatz brings back some memories by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had forgotten all about that idiot Jon Katz until I tried his jonkatz command. Wowzers, that's handy!

  78. Re:It's not social by Leeji · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, there have been apps that have done this forever. But they've all been standalone, and don't travel with you between machines. I wrote a post about interfacting with YubNub via Monad here: http://www.leeholmes.com/blog/MSHAndYubNubACommuni tyCommandline.aspx

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  79. Two cool commands: population of any country and g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example, try
    pop canada

    and

    gdp canada

  80. Amazing advancement by Peaker · · Score: 1

    It would be so cool if I could type:
    "gg:String" and get the google search results on String.
    Or:
    "ggl:Blah" and go directly to the first match!

    Or even add my own commands, all from my very own control center!

  81. YubNub from the commandline with MSH by Leeji · · Score: 1
    I wrote a little blog entry on searching YubNub via the command-line in MSH:
    ## search-yubnub.msh
    ## Search yubnub from your Monad shell
    ## For help, use "search-yubnub ge"

    ## Load the System.Web assembly
    [void] [Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("System .Web")

    $url = "http://www.yubnub.org/parser/parse?command={0}" -f [System.Web.HttpUtility]::UrlEncode($args)
    [Diagn ostics.Process]::Start($url)
    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  82. dang... by seanmeister · · Score: 1

    I was hoping it would be something like this - something I cooked up long ago for Xanga.com.

  83. Firefox Plugin by teckjunkie · · Score: 0

    http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=yubnu b&submitform=Find+search+plugins Thought I would point out there is a great firefox plugin for this website.

  84. Is a Ruby on Rails app by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should be noted, with all the Ruby/Rails hype lately, that this is indeed a Ruby on Rails app. It was originally submitted as project in the www.railsday.com competetion (to see what can be done with Rails in 24hours).

    1. Re:Is a Ruby on Rails app by Kryptkrwlr_XTC · · Score: 0

      Yeah I say it explode after it was featured on "Attack of The Show".

  85. In Related News by Foolomon · · Score: 2, Funny
    VUE is building a command-line version of Counterstrike. Below are some of the transcripts from games played online.

    [Ding dang dong]
    [Psssssssssh]
    Player 1: I hate smoke grenades
    [Pow!]
    Player 2: pwnz0rd!
    Player 1 (Spectator): Wallhax!

    Elsewhere, Kazaa has developed a command-line version of its file download capabilities:

    "GET AmericanIdiot.mp3"
    [Duh duh-duh DUH duh-duh duh duh-duh duh duh]
    "Don't wanna be an American Idiot..."

  86. Been doing it for years by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have been using Perl for years to do simple command line scripts to extract information from web sites. From foreign exchange rates, to looking up owners/addresses of incoming phone numbers, or abreviated weather forecasts or train schedules.

    I began when my old laptop took too long to start a web browser. But even though I now always have a web browser window open, typing "xchange 1432 EUR" is still much faster and simpler than navigating to the appropriate web site and filling in forms.

    I'm actually surprised to see such an idea posted here as news. I thought that anybody who knows some scripting has always been doing this sort of thing.

    Of course, Perl is ideal for this sort of thing, with regular expressions and all the CPAN modules (LWP::Simple, and dozens of others more specialized).

  87. Re:Good idea! Only - too bad it's already function by zardo · · Score: 1

    Yubnub actually defaults to using google, so it's basically just a way to customize google. I figure if yubnub gets any more attention google will come in with the spikey flail to crush some skulls.

  88. Similar Site by net.ghost · · Score: 1

    I just thought I'd mention that I've been working on a similar site, called QueryAlong. The objective is a little different, but the end result is similar.

    QueryAlong

    Users can submit search engines and other queriable urls. I think QueryAlong's model is a little more complete too since it can handle multiple named parameters.

    For instance if you want to find all the queries that handle Zipcodes as their parameter:

    View Zipcode queries

    Take a look, sign up and play with it a bit. It's still being developed, and it resides on a server in our closet, but I think it's worth looking into.

    Also I'd love some feedback, this is a little project I've been toying with for a while.

    .adam sanderson
  89. Hack for Safari YubNub support by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

    This hack converts the Google search field built in to Safari into a YubNub search/"command line" field.

    Close Safari. Open this file in a hex editor such as HexEdit, or open it in vi if you know how to use vi: /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari

    after creating backup of the file for just-in-case, replace the ASCII string:
    http://.google.com/%25@?q=%25@&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

    with this ASCII string:
    http://yubnub.org/parser/parse?command=%25@

    For this hack I used this hint.

    1. Re:Hack for Safari YubNub support by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

      Ack! Slashdot garbled up my post! Let me try posting this again.

      This hack converts the Google search field in Safari into a YubNub search/command line field.

      The hack:
      Close Safari. Open this file in a hex editor such as HexEdit, or open it in vi if you know how to use vi: /Applications/Safari.app/Contents/MacOS/Safari

      If you want, create a backup of this file just in case. In this file, replace the ASCII string:
      ttp://%@.google.com/%@?q=%@&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8

      with this ASCII string:
      ttp://%@%@@yubnub.org/parser/parse?command=%@

      For this hack I used this hint. What it does is it replaces a url with another url of same length, so that the binary's length is unchanged. There are three %@'s. They are replaced with "www", "search", and the search term. We only want the search term, so we put an at mark between the first two terms and the domain name, which results in everything before the at mark being ignored.

  90. Thanks! by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    I never noticed that, very cool.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  91. AntiSocial by somethinghollow · · Score: 1

    Everything and their mom is going "social" these days. Doesn't anyone just want to be left alone any more?

  92. Reinventing the wheel... by FellowConspirator · · Score: 1

    Several web browsers already have this sort of feature built-in. Konqueror and Firefox, for example.

    If you are using Konqueror, type the following into the location field and see what comes up:

    wp:slashdot

    ... now go to yubnub.org, find the search field, type in 'wp slashdot' and click 'submit'.

    Like yubnub.org, you can make your own shortcuts. I suppose the idea of yubnub is that you can share these things with friends through their site, but you could just as easily share the shortcut and it would ultimately be easier to use the second time around...

  93. Re:It's not social by numatrix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, my firefox bookmarks (and relevant keywords) travel with me just fine thanks to bookmarks synchronizer. Of course, now I just have to figure out where that japanese developer's website has gone so I can find new updates to the code if he posts them. Heaven forbid a new ff release break the current stuff. ;-)

  94. XML-RPC by JohnsonWax · · Score: 1

    Isn't this just command-line XML-RPC?

    Why not simply build a command line tool that leverages what developers have already in place?

  95. I don't understand! by rduke15 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had a look at the site. What is it that is new and/or interesting in this? I went to the "golden eggs" page, which is supposed to list the most interesting commands. What I see there falls into one of 2 categories:

    - a complicated way of executing a normal shell command (di ("Domain (WHOIS) Information using coolwhois.com") seems to do exactly the same as a modern whois, ipinfo-url looks like a a lame version of host, etc.),

    or

    - it does the same as adding a search engine to your Firefox search bar.

    Have I missed something?

  96. vi for the web by sblanky · · Score: 1

    I'd like a full set of vi commands for the web. :wq (save as bookmark and exit) ZZ (here comes the boss, kill the porn) :set nu (add line numbers to page) :set list (same as view source) / n next search term p previous search term

  97. AOL Keywords by JohnnyBigodes · · Score: 1

    AOL Keyword: commandline.

    Ring a bell, anyone?

  98. How much you wanna bet... by BarakMich · · Score: 1

    Google buys it?

  99. Exactly Right by Tisha_AH · · Score: 1

    The days of telnetting into university servers, using ARCHIE to dig through text files, even using 3270 emulation to log into mainframes. I cut my teeth on that stuff (broke a nail too). They quietly faded away 10-12 years ago. When the web came out I was really down on it. How "dare" someone make the internet easier! Gradually I gave in to it and learned to like certain aspects of it too. How is this going to work? The majority of internet users have never even seen the command line on their XP boxes. This is one of the big stumbling blocks to getting Linux distro's that the uninitated will install and use. One of the common complaints is that the command line stuff is "too hard". I work with other engineers who still do not know how to narrow down a search in google for phrases by using the "quotes". Let's call it CLI (command line interface) so it has a snazzy name that will draw people to it.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
  100. There already is one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read this blog (http://mradulovich.blogspot.com/2005/03/command-l ine-strikes-back.html), you'll see that the web command line already exists. Why do we need anything else?

  101. Dozomo by mcbridematt · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of Dozomo, that 'internet commandline' created for the 24hour Dotcom. The two basically do the same thing afaik.

  102. or... by bitspotter · · Score: 1

    or Firefox's Keyword Bookmarks?

  103. I've been doing command-line interaction with simple shell scripts containing one Curl cmmand for ages.

  104. This will be a tech support nightmare.... by LifeMatesCanada.Com · · Score: 1

    Bad enough there are still people who can't wrap their heads around pointing and clicking - this will be a tech support nightmare if it becomes mainstream. I'm having a vision from the old dos days, when my dad had pages and pages of commands taped all over his study, and I still had to remind him of "cd.." 3 times a week.

    --
    Single? Canadian? We can help. Visit http://www.l
  105. IE and Mozilla both have this feature by mike_stay · · Score: 1

    For IE6 you add it to the registry: create a new key under
    HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\SearchUrl
    and give it the name of the command (i.e. "g" for google).

    Set the default string value under the key to the URL to use; %s gets replaced by what you type after the command. For the google example above, set the value to "http://www.google.com/search?q=%s"

    You can also do character->string mappings; create a string value whose name is the character to replace, and whose value is a replacement string. Most common are things like ("&", "%26").

  106. Before 1993, it was all command line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Point and click on the web started with Mozilla in 1993. Before that, it was all command line, for the first 20 years or so...wasn't it?

  107. Surfraw by Read+Icculus · · Score: 1

    Shell Users' Revolutionary Front Rage Against the Web

    Once again the *nix world has had this taken care of for years.

    I posted about this an AC earlier today, but now that I'm back at home time to give some more info.

    From the website:
    "Surfraw provides a fast unix command line interface to a variety of
    popular WWW search engines and other artifacts of power. It reclaims
    google, altavista, babelfish, dejanews, freshmeat, research index,
    slashdot and many others from the false-prophet, pox-infested heathen
    lands of html-forms, placing these wonders where they belong, deep in
    unix heartland, as god loving extensions to the shell.

    Surfraw abstracts the browser away from input. Doing so lets it get on
    with what it's good at. Browsing. Interpretation of linguistic forms
    is handed back to the shell, which is what it, and human beings are
    good at. Combined with netscape-remote or incremental text browsers,
    such as links (http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~mikulas/links/), w3m
    (http://www.w3m.org/), and screen(1) a Surfraw liberateur is capable
    of navigating speeds that leave GUI tainted idolaters agape with fear
    and wonder.

    For example:

    $ ask why is jeeves gay?
    $ google -results=100 RMS, GNU, which is sinner, which is sin?
    $ austlii -method=phrase dog like
    $ rhyme -method=perfect Julian"

    And obviously you can hack this to make it work with whatever website you could want to use. Much better than this YubNub stuff from my glance at it.

    --
    Anti-social? My code is just platform-specific.
  108. Isn't this what cmdln.com has been doing for years by johnsmith2005 · · Score: 1

    with a marginally less silly URL?

  109. I prefer to by jeddak · · Score: 1

    combine the power of the command line and the web by using wget. :)

  110. Command line eh.... by MSDos-486 · · Score: 1

    C:\Internet\www\>dir .... 999*10^99999 files ([overflow] bytes)

  111. Re:How about everybody else? by Leeji · · Score: 1

    Well, yes ... there have been means to share your own search urls with yourself for quite some time as well. USB Keychains, an FTP account somewhere, rsync, or one of the many dotcoms that busted.

    The point is still that it's not social. Until Firefox (and all other browsers, for that matter) can merge them from a public source and promote the good ones, it's still your custom, private, solution.

    --
    It all goes downhill from first post ...
  112. DQSD by michaelhood · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen any mention of DQSD yet, so I figured I'd link it. Embeds a searchbar into your Windows taskbar, and comes with a HUGE set of default commands, stored in configuration files. Then you can add your own basic aliases, or write small scripts into XML files. Pretty cool.

  113. When you can't find it - create it! by slthytove · · Score: 1

    Hopefully you're still checking the responses to your comment. After I read your comment yesterday, I started to think about how cool it would be to have a console like that. I couldn't find one, so I scrounged one together. If you want to follow the instructions, I posted them here:

    http://toveness.blogspot.com/2005/06/windows-conso le-la-quake.html

    Hopefully you can find this useful!

  114. Re:How about everybody else? by numatrix · · Score: 1

    No, it isn't social. But it travels. For social ones that travel, how about del.icio.us?

    Yubnub's interesting, but I don't see it as groundbreaking.