Slashdot Mirror


NerdTV Coming in September

Random BedHead Ed writes "After years of development, Robert X. Cringely's NerdTV is finally on its way, and will be released September 6th. The program will feature interviews with prominent nerds, such as Bill Joy and Macintosh programmer Andy Hertzfeld. But far from being a normal television show, it will be downloadable. As Cringely explained last week in his column, BitTorrent and the expansion of broadband made this the right time for such a move. The show will be available at pbs.org/nerdtv/, where there is currently an information page. Larry Lessig points out that the show will be distributed under a Creative Commons license - the specific license is not specified, but Cringely and PBS say that noncommercial use and redistribution will be allowed."

212 comments

  1. Is his middle initial really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    How many Robert Cringley's are there who write tech columns and host PBS computer shows? Or does the man in question secretly want to be referred to as RXC?

    1. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      A lot of people think a middle initial adds a touch of class...
      In my mind, a middle initial adds a touch of crime, as law enforcement, when putting out a bulletin, uses all three names to avoid confusion. That is why most notorious criminals go by all three names when discussed in the media...
      I for one am looking forward to this series- I hope it does for us (nerd persecution must end) what inside the actors studio did for obscure hollywoodians.
      I just hope that it gets hard hitting... think the spin stops here, but with a nerdy twist.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a pen name and it isn't really ever officially abbreviated or otherwise shortened.

      And as for "How many Robert Cringley's are there who write tech columns and host PBS computer shows?", there are at least 2 Robert X. Cringely's that write tech columns (though one is barred from writing them in tech publications). Mark Stephens started using the pen name when writing for InfoWorld and continued to use it after leaving, but InfoWorld had a trademark on it.

      They sued and it eventually ended up that Robert X. Cringely means Mark Stephens everywhere but InfoWorld and InfoWorld continues to host a column under that name which isn't written by Stephens.

      Wikipedia has more information.

    3. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by CaymanIslandCarpedie · · Score: 4, Funny

      A lot of people think a middle initial adds a touch of class... In my mind, a middle initial adds a touch of crime

      Says Alex P Keaton.. ;-)

      --
      "reality has a well-known liberal bias" - Steven Colbert
    4. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1998, it was revealed that Cringley had falsely claimed a Ph.D. from Stanford University. When confronted with these charges, Cringely told a reporter: "[A] new fact has now become painfully clear to me: you don't say you have the Ph.D unless you REALLY have the Ph.D."

      People actually listen to this clown?

    5. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by 1ivewire · · Score: 1

      Maybe people who have as cool a middle initial as X just like to show it off.

      David X. Cohen comes to mind.

    6. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by UnixRawks · · Score: 4, Funny
      n my mind, a middle initial adds a touch of crime...

      George W Bush comes to mind.

      --
      I
    7. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Says Cayman I Carpedie.. :-)

    8. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Kenshin · · Score: 1

      A lot of people think a middle initial adds a touch of class...

      I guess I ain't got no class.

      (No middle name. Rodney Dangerfield moment...)

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    9. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just whining 'cause you only have two names, admit it!

    10. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      Says Carl E. von Kleist, IV, KSC.

      Don't forget your suffix and any titles you may have gained.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    11. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roscoe P. Coltrane

    12. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Jack The Ripper.

    13. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfair moderation. Damn Funny.

    14. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by paz5 · · Score: 1
      In the case of David X. Cohen his middle name does not really start with an X (I dont know if he has one) but the Screen Actors Guild Membership Rules And Regulations say:
      It is the Guild's objective that no member use a professional name which is the same as, or resembles so closely as to tend to be confused with, the name of any other member
      David X. Cohen explains/complains about this in the commentary for one of the Futurama DVD's.

      Maybe there is similar reason for the X here.
    15. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by gbulmash · · Score: 1
      in my mind, a middle initial adds a touch of crime...

      George W Bush comes to mind.

      Or George's hero... Jesus H. Christ

    16. Re:Is his middle initial really necessary? by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 1

      Says Rufus R Freight-Train Jones.

  2. Andy Hertzfeld? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gee, that ought to make for compelling TV. Earth to Bob: it's now 2005.

  3. Yeah! by de+Bois-Guilbert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is way cool.
    Really nice for us geographically challanged non-americans to get it without the usual half-a-year waiting period too.

    1. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could have nerdtv now - just use www.vobbo.com to record your own nerd broadcasts.

    2. Re:Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone ready the surface to nerd missles.

    3. Re:Yeah! by planckscale · · Score: 1
      I wonder what quality, codec will be used for the download...?

      --
      Namaste
    4. Re:Yeah! by gunpowda · · Score: 2, Funny
      But far from being a normal television show, it will be downloadable.

      Now if only there was some way to download "normal" TV shows...

    5. Re:Yeah! by Jeet81 · · Score: 1

      Well if you google the right terms you can probably find other shows on torrents too (maybe).

  4. What about a downloadable gardening show? by Eunuch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reminds me of the earlier internet. Thousands of sights on, aghast!, computer programming. Zero on fashion, or gardening.

    --
    Transcend Humanity. Please.
    1. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, fashion?

    2. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

      well that's kinda the point. The barrier for distribution (sorta) has gone down. If you/someone could produce a quality gardening show on the cheap, this idea could be replicated for that topic.

      you hear that Paul james?!

      --
      Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
    3. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by xstonedogx · · Score: 1

      As hard as it may be to believe, women posting on /. isn't just a myth.

      And unlike their male counterparts, the women here may actually care about fashion and other unimportant things; you know, like hygiene.

    4. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by part_of_you · · Score: 0

      Girls!!! Icky icky stinky stinky! Pocket-protectors just look so wrong on women. I mean, they have boobies an stuff. Once a girl tried to kiss me! It took me 10-1/2 straight hours of programing to get her out of my head.

    5. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and the grandparent has no balls even if she is a guy

    6. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by mean+pun · · Score: 1
      Thousands of sights on, aghast!, computer programming.

      I'm sorry to be a spelling Nazi, but typos like this really are an obstacle to efficient communication. This one left me wondering what rifle sights, sight seeing, or some other obscure use of the word sight, had to with computer programming.

    7. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      What is scary is that I read it as "sights" = "eyes" And the "aghast" as "avast". Sounded way too piratical for me.

    8. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hygiene != cleanliness

    9. Re:What about a downloadable gardening show? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but sadly, we'll never know, since they should be in the kitchen right about now, making me my dinner...

      (You gotta attack a stereotype with a stereotype, right?)

      --
      It's been a long time.
  5. Re:Gee Whix by cshark · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's going to be awesome. Bob is always fun to watch and read. And he's pro splicing. So it's going to be okay to have some fun cutting up his interviews and doing interesting things to them.

    --

    This signature has Super Cow Powers

  6. Slashdot backup? by Fishead · · Score: 3, Funny

    So between slashdot stories I can get my "hit" from TV?

  7. I dont think it will work... by Kjuib · · Score: 5, Funny

    Unless they have a mostly white back ground with a funky green menus and fonts. Otherwise I think I will stick with my Slashdot.

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
    1. Re:I dont think it will work... by part_of_you · · Score: 0

      What??? Slashdot isn't gunna have it's own show?

    2. Re:I dont think it will work... by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? I wish slashdot would change their background to black instead of white....staring at a white background is hard on the eye's and the equivalent of staring at a light bulb. Dark backgrounds are much better for a readers eyes.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  8. Creative Commons license.. by Marc2k · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Creative Commons license is often heralded among certain music circles, because it affords an artist the ability to remix and mash licensed songs as they see fit for non-commercial purposes. ..personally, I can't wait to make my own 'remixed' versions of Cringely's show for my own nefarious purposes.

    --
    --- What
    1. Re:Creative Commons license.. by ortholattice · · Score: 1
      My problem with "non-commercial" CC licenses is that the term "commercial use" is rather vague and hard to interpret in a lot of cases. Sure, it's obvious when you are offering the specific licensed item for sale. But in subtle, indirect ways almost everything we do (on the web at least) involves commerce in some way or form. Suppose an ISP puts a Google ad on a personal page in exchange for a free personal web site that you're posting the licensed item on? Suddenly it becomes "commercial use." Someone, somewhere may be profiting indirectly from the licensed item.

      Suppose I want to use some of it (with proper acknowledgement, of course) in an open-source GPL'ed project that I've volunteered my time for. Oops, the GPL allows its software to be used by a commercial company, no can do. Sometimes I might be able to get permission, but often the hassle just isn't worth it.

      Overall, I get nervous using "non-commercial" material; it's one more thing to worry about. Usually I just avoid it altogether for my own use in a creative project.

    2. Re:Creative Commons license.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that nefarious as in speech, or nefarious as in beer?

    3. Re:Creative Commons license.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most CC music is realised under the ND (non-derivatives) part of the license, meaning you can't remix it, use it as part of another program, or generally mess around with it. This makes mash-ups and mixing illegal, and has been the cause of delay and problems in the Cenobitic (http://www.cenobitic.org/?p=23) project, it seems.

  9. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to sit at work listening to my fellow programmers, now I can finally go home and listen to more programmers. Thank you PBS!

  10. Free=Respect by sigloiv · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just the fact that someone is giving their show away over the internet for free earns enough respect for me to actually give this a look. I haven't ever heard of the host, but if he's smart enough to know about Creative Commons liscenses he's better than 90% of the computer show people out there.

    --
    Software is like sex. It's better when it's free. -Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:Free=Respect by justforaday · · Score: 4, Informative

      I haven't ever heard of the host...

      I'd suggest you check out his weekly column from time to time. He seems to be one of the few tech pundits out there that actually has half a clue. Although sometimes it's obvious it's only half a clue...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    2. Re:Free=Respect by Otter · · Score: 1
      I haven't ever heard of the host...

      My question was going to be "Whatever happened to Cringeley anyway?" I stopped reading his column years ago as the only value seemed to be of the broken-clock-that's-right-twice-a-day variety. Judging from the evaporation of once-common Cringeley links on Slashdot, I'm not the only one.

      As the guest list indicates (Andy Hertzfeld and Bill Joy? Where's Alan Turing?), his circle of Silicon Valley buddies is getting a bit long in the tooth...

    3. Re:Free=Respect by sigloiv · · Score: 1
      I clicked on that link and saw something about Nerds 2.0.1. My computer teacher at school own that movie and regularly shows it in class when our Apple server is "down" (low on disk space).

      I'll be sure to check out the columns, though. His movie isn't bad, but I know what you mean by "half a clue".

      --
      Software is like sex. It's better when it's free. -Linus Torvalds
    4. Re:Free=Respect by Musteval · · Score: 0

      I haven't ever heard of the host, but if he's smart enough to know about Creative Commons liscenses he's better than 90% of the computer show people out there. If he knows how to spell licenses, he's definitely top one percent.

      --
      Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    5. Re:Free=Respect by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      The Turing interview is waiting for the show to make enough profit to buy the Ouiji board.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    6. Re:Free=Respect by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Just the fact that someone is giving their show away over the internet for free

      Really, though, it's more economy than philanthropy, especially if it's an Attribution-NoDerivs license. If there aren't ads, it's low-cost distribution, because mirroring and propagation are taken care of. If it's with-ads, it's that plus ad income to take care of initial production costs.

      I'm not saying it's a bad thing, though... it still means I can get it restriction-free.

      (Musing) I imagine the biggest reason this sort of thing doesn't catch on more is more a reason that (especially with topical shows), there's the problem of not being able to sub-license the elements of the show (graphics, clips, etc.) from outside sources. A news program, for instance, would be a great candidate for open-distrib (since it's pretty much useless after it airs) if not for the problem of purchased outside source material.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    7. Re:Free=Respect by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      As the guest list indicates (Andy Hertzfeld and Bill Joy? Where's Alan Turing?)

      Um. Let me put this in terms a nerd can understand.

      Alan Turing has become more powerful than you can possibly imagine. His interview is delayed until such a time as he masters the ability to "come back from The Force."

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    8. Re:Free=Respect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow... you are definitely new here.

  11. Official News Service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are they going to be licensing Naked News? If they are going to properly service Nerds the needs the right news service.

  12. maybe by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

    Maybe he wants to be called "Rixey."

  13. Hmm Redistribution by pardasaniman · · Score: 1

    I like the whole redistrubatable deely.. Maybe we could have an apt or portage repository.. Then one could daily do an apt-get install tvshow or emerge tvshow? Now that would be super Cow Powers!

    1. Re:Hmm Redistribution by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2

      I like the whole redistrubatable deely.. Maybe we could have an apt or portage repository.. Then one could daily do an apt-get install tvshow or emerge tvshow? Now that would be super Cow Powers!

      Are you kidding? real nerds make a point of receiving NerdTV in Morse code, manually, then entering the received number in a file with ed, then un-pgp the file with a secret 2048-bit key found on an IRC channel to which you can only be invited if you request it with a phrase found in a file distributed on BitTorrent, then uudecode it, then view it with an ascii-art FLI viewer.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    2. Re:Hmm Redistribution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's not what nerds do. that's what windows users downloading warez do.

    3. Re:Hmm Redistribution by yotto · · Score: 1


      Are you kidding? real nerds make a point of receiving NerdTV in Morse
      code, manually, then entering the received number in a file with ed,
      then un-pgp the file with a secret 2048-bit key found on an IRC
      channel to which you can only be invited if you request it with a
      phrase found in a file distributed on BitTorrent, then uudecode it,
      then view it with an ascii-art FLI viewer.


      So that means we found another legal use for Bittorrent?

  14. When did it become ok ? by far_star · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When did it become ok to start calling people nerds ? Seriously, is it ok to call a hip-hop dance show "N*ggers that dance" ? Before you say "Well that's different because that's a racial epiteth then how about a home remodeling show "Fags have fun with your living room" ?

    I mean, since nerd IS still a word that is used in a negative way it should not be bandied around like this. I don't care if you're not offended by it. Some people are.

    And before you say "Well you are posting this on a site labled 'news for nerds'" I say yes, I know that Einsten. And it bothers me, but I think if anything. This is the place that a discussion like this needs to happen.

    --
    In an average living room there are 1,242 objects Vin Diesel could use to kill you, including the room itself.
    1. Re:When did it become ok ? by jejones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I suppose one could try to give it the PC "reclaim a derogatory term" spin, but... perhaps I should just suggest viewing Revenge of the Nerds.

    2. Re:When did it become ok ? by Joehonkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow. Let's all make a society that's so PC nobody can say what they want anymore. If you take serious offence at words like "geek" or "nerd" then you are a small, small person. Even comparing it to racist and the use of N*gger is pathetic. It's not close to the same.

    3. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      haha! nerd.

    4. Re:When did it become ok ? by Skye16 · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm proud to be a nerd. My girlfriend and I started talking initially because she "really, really likes nerdy guys" (she also likes geeky guys, which I am as well, so it was extra good luck for me).

      I have no problem being geeky or nerdy or being called geeky or nerdy. I am what I am and I'm proud of that.

      I'm sorry you're so ashamed of what you are, but really, if you don't want to be a geek or a nerd, just join a gym, suck it up for a year or two, and start being a jock. S'your choice.

    5. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since Apple, AOL, MTV, etc. made computing chic? a "nerd" isn't what it used to be. back in the good old days you would get an ass kicking just for touching a PC. I literally lost friends back in my school days because I had a PC in my room. They didn't know I was into computers and were shocked when they came to my house. They just couldn't deal with associating with someone who exhibited "nerd" behavior. (and no, I didn't have Star Trek action figures lining the walls, etc. etc.)

    6. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am very upset at being called Einstien, even though you misspelled his name. You have offended me greatly. Now take it back!

    7. Re:When did it become ok ? by The+Clash+Man · · Score: 1

      Wait,you are seriously bothered by the word Nerd? Well...wow, thats all I can say.
      But in response to your comparing it to N*gger. Many black people think its fine to use that word in reference to each other. And as far as I can tell, this is a show about Nerds, made by Nerds,with Nerds on it. So by that standard it seems fine.
      Hope I didn't say Nerd too many times for ya ;)

    8. Re:When did it become ok ? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how about a home remodeling show "Fags have fun with your living room" ?

      You know the term "queer" as in "Queer Eye for a Straight Guy" used to be an offensive term too, but some homosexuals embraced the term rather than being offended by it. I'd say the term "nerd" is likewise a badge of pride among many people. After all you're reading a site that says, "News for Nerds" right at the top of it.

    9. Re:When did it become ok ? by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's a tip: You cannot give offense, you can only take it.

      To paraphrase that icon of Nerd-dom, James Kirk, "Sorry about your thin skin, but as we say on Earth, 'C'est la vie.'"

    10. Re:When did it become ok ? by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      Your relationship is built upon a sham. You are no longer "nerdy" or "geeky". Everyone knows nerds and geeks don't have girlfriends!

    11. Re:When did it become ok ? by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      I mean, since nerd IS still a word that is used in a negative way it should not be bandied around like this. I don't care if you're not offended by it. Some people are

      So, you would rather fall to the whims of all of the jocks and bullies of your past? You'd rather fall and wallow in your own self pity?

      I say: may we never be complete. I say: may we never be content. I say: deliver me from doublespeak! I say: deliver me from popular opinion. I say: evolve, and let the chips fall where they may.

      You're not your fucking pocket protector, chief.

    12. Re:When did it become ok ? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm proud to be a nerd. My girlfriend and I

      Look, who do you think you're kidding here?

      started talking initially because she "really, really likes nerdy guys"

      Aw now come on, don't overdo it.

      (she also likes geeky guys,

      Well, large jpegs of pink moist young girls really can be lifelike, and with a little imagination, they really do seem to like everybody very much.

      Okay, bad joke. I'm just kidding :-)

      (photos please?)

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    13. Re:When did it become ok ? by Ghostx13 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if being called a nerd offends you you need to grow up.

      If your so insecure in your "nerdom" that someone calling you a name can make you cry you have deeper issues to worry about than wondering "when it became ok".

      I'm a TOTAL geek. I have no problem being called one. One could also make the argument that I'm a nerd, although having a girlfriend and not being socially inept would probably preclude me from the nerd label, I don't mind it when my gf or friends call me a physics nerd, or a star wars nerd or anything else. Some big dumb jock could do the same and I wouldn't cry about it either.

      If your a nerd, be proud of what you are. If your not and some one calls you a nerd, f*ck them, who cares what someone else thinks.

    14. Re:When did it become ok ? by kryptx · · Score: 1

      "Nerd", like many words, only takes on a pejorative meaning if it's used in a pejorative sense.

      I could call somebody a religious zealot, or an intellectual, or a conservative or liberal, or obvious insults like asshole or worse, or even objective things like democrat and republican. Whether those things are intended to speak badly about the people to whom they refer depends on the context in which they are said (including to whom and under what circumstances) and what is known about the person saying them.

      For instance, "conservative" and "liberal" coming from Al Franken have quite different meanings than coming from Sean Hannity, and "homie" is quite different when said by a gang-buster thug than by a middle-class white college student. Some (like "asshole", "punk", "loser") can even be different when said between friends than they are between enemies.

      Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is that the word itself isn't what should be considered offensive. And if you think that a company is going on a business venture trying to make money by talking pejoratively to the tech-savvy, you should think again.

      --
      Mods: Do you disagree with me? Go ahead and mod me down. Meta-mods will sort it out. Good luck!
    15. Re:When did it become ok ? by Davis+Bacon · · Score: 4, Funny

      And before you say "Well you are posting this on a site labled 'news for nerds'" I say yes, I know that Einsten.

      I like it when you call me "Einstein".

      -Jam

    16. Re:When did it become ok ? by fbartho · · Score: 1

      You just said that my Social Circle's name was derogatory you insensitive Clod.

      --
      Gravity Sucks
    17. Re:When did it become ok ? by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you let words offend and anger you, then really, all you have done is give up control of your emotions and your mind to those who use the words against you. You are their slave and puppet.

      If I can walk into a room full of [any "sensitive" group] and say ["offensive" name for group] and start a riot, really, all they have done is given me the power to control their lives. Power by mere speech.

      Not saying it's okay, and kind of off the point, but a word is only as bad as your perception of it. Let it go, and stop being an emotional slave to those who would control you with their tongues.

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
    18. Re:When did it become ok ? by rhakka · · Score: 1

      when I was in high school, a bunch of us started referring to ourselves as freaks. It became a badge of pride to be a freak. If real freaks were offended by that, well, that's just too bad.

      Something similar has happened in nerd circles since the rise of the internet and mainstreaming of video games. You can be offended by it, or you can wear the badge with pride. How you handle it is up to you, but many of us out here are quite proud to call ourselves nerds, and have better things to do with our time than worry about closet cases crying themselves to sleep at night.

    19. Re:When did it become ok ? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 1

      I am very upset at being called Einstien, even though you misspelled his name. You have offended me greatly. Now take it back!

      Yeah, because Einstein is ugly. (Reference from That 70's Show)

      --
      Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
    20. Re:When did it become ok ? by schon · · Score: 1

      Umm.. are you any relation to Kevin? :o)

    21. Re:When did it become ok ? by Cashlock · · Score: 1

      >Seriously, is it ok to call a hip-hop dance show "N*ggers that dance"? The starts-with-n-epithet is definitely accepted in the hip hop community as long as you are a black person using the word. Some would consider it insulting, but most are using to reclaiming the word for themselves. Also, Slashdot has been "New for Nerds" forever, and it is acceptable because it is nerds labeling themselves nerds.

    22. Re:When did it become ok ? by FLEB · · Score: 1

      My problem, personally, with the word "N*gger" is how to pronounce the asterisk. "Nass-tuhr-iss-kah-tig-ger"? "Nass-tar-uhg-ger"?

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    23. Re:When did it become ok ? by klausboop · · Score: 1

      Better a "nerd" than a "geek" though, right? I mean, nerd had its origins in a Dr. Suess book and means "A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept"

      A geek, while evidently still meaning "A person who is single-minded or accomplished in scientific or technical pursuits but is felt to be socially inept," also means "A carnival performer whose show consists of bizarre acts, such as biting the head off a live chicken."

      I mean, I'm all for the carnival crowd mistaking me for Ozzy Osborne, but...

      --
      Some of you already have those cute little shirts on that say disco sucks, right? That's not all that sucks.-Frank Zappa
    24. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. "Nerd" has now become part of the "cool kids" culture. It wasn't always that way, and I often find that those who embrace this neo-nerd fashion really aren't nerds in the true sense of the word.

      Nowadays, being a nerd means you shop at Hot Topic and buy shirts that I was ridiculed for wearing 10-15 years ago.

      While part of me would love to embrace this and be happy with it, it all seems a bit too fake.

    25. Re:When did it become ok ? by temi · · Score: 1

      far star
      When did it become ok to start calling people nerds ? Seriously, is it ok to call a hip-hop dance show "N*ggers that dance" ? Before you say "Well that's different because that's a racial epiteth then how about a home remodeling show "Fags have fun with your living room" ?

      Ahh come on! both terms: N*gger and F*ggot are so much more loaded to the point that people labeled with these words were murdered for it. Have you ever witnessed a mob killing or fatal attack on some glasses wearing kid, whilst people are yelling "Die Nerd!"?

      These terms aren't even close to comparable, but I appreciate your attempt at logic. You sound like someone who picked up the workings of HTML last year and now like to comment about "how code works".

    26. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      NEEEERRD!

    27. Re:When did it become ok ? by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Although fictional, I still have vivid memories of reading Lord of the Flies in high school. That comes close to what you mentioned. But I agree that the terms are loaded and a poor comparison in real life.

    28. Re:When did it become ok ? by thebagel · · Score: 1

      I don't know about anyone else, but I don't see n****r as racist when they call themselves that publicly (both in the media, and not. Grocery store or rap track, it makes no difference).

    29. Re:When did it become ok ? by ph43drus · · Score: 1

      Look, who do you think you're kidding here?

      Hey man, my girlfriend runs Debian on her laptop and never asks me to fix it for her or install software for her or any of that stuff.

      ...

      No, dead serious.

      Jeff

    30. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did it become ok to start calling people nerds?
      Just own it. I can't remember the last time someone called me a nerd that did not mean it as a compliment.

    31. Re:When did it become ok ? by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 1

      i find the term "Einsten" negative and offensive..

      --
      serenity now!
    32. Re:When did it become ok ? by RevPsycho · · Score: 1

      Yes, and as a person who was named James (no, my middle name is not Tiberius) Kirk by his parents, I can testify that as a nerd/geek, having a thick skin comes in quite handy.

      Also, being named after an "icon of Nerd-dom" does have its benefits... I'm a programmer, so it is very helpful during job interviews. Making an impression on the interviewer(s) is very important, and nobody ever forgets my name. :)

    33. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is ridiculous. If you're offended by the word "nerd" I really don't know what to say. Since the rest of us takes pride in it, I guess the only reasonable conclusion is that you're not a nerd.

      So get the hell out.

    34. Re:When did it become ok ? by 0racle · · Score: 1

      Ya, because she can't even figure out how to get to a desktop.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    35. Re:When did it become ok ? by typical · · Score: 1

      Have you ever witnessed a mob killing or fatal attack on some glasses wearing kid, whilst people are yelling "Die Nerd!"?

      Skipped junior high, did we?

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    36. Re:When did it become ok ? by typical · · Score: 1

      "Nerd" is negative.

      "Geek" was negative, but at least in the OSS world, has taken on a decidedly positive flavor.

      --
      Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    37. Re:When did it become ok ? by Aquamouth · · Score: 0

      i myself am a black homosexual nerdy vegetarian...so i guess that makes me a nerdy faggoty nerd who eats vegetables. lol..

      --
      und das ist alle fur jetz
    38. Re:When did it become ok ? by Aquamouth · · Score: 0

      i have realized that i am a unique person and so from the perspective of people looking at me, i may seem a bit odd or weird, geeky, nerdy what have you, but you just have to be you and not worry about what others think. i enjoy being around other geeks, nerds, freaks, and weirdos. i had a point to this post, but i am too tired to complete it. long live oddities!

      --
      und das ist alle fur jetz
    39. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to be honest, I think those who were killed by a mob had it easy compared to kids going through years of harrassment which leads to serious social anxiety issues as well as depression in their adult life.

      if given the choice between growing up a "nerd" (back when a nerd was a serious issue and not socially acceptable as today) or getting stoned to death by a mob, I would much rather take the mob. painful, but your pain ends in a matter of an hour or less.

    40. Re:When did it become ok ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, as a math nerd, I would take offense at being called "Einsten", as opposed to "Einstein", and I'd prefer "Eisenstein". Way more useful in what I do.

      F*ck relativity. Abstract all the way!

    41. Re:When did it become ok ? by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Oh, agreed! But that doesn't eliminate its long and unsavory history and frequent current use by racists.

  15. My question: by the_mighty_$ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Will it include commercials? If it does, and advertisers are still willing to pay even if the show is not being distrubuted via standard means (i.e. television), then we may be witnessing the beginning of a new era of advertising. Kind of like what Google did with Adwords.

    --
    VI VI VI - the editor of the beast!
    1. Re:My question: by gandell · · Score: 1

      Given that this show is on PBS, advertisement will probably FOLLOW the program anyway. I would assume that it might come BEFORE it during the download, if the download includes the sponsers at all.

      --
      Mercy was given to me by Christ...I must give the same to others.
    2. Re:My question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The show is on PBS, which doesn't run commercials per se - just those damn guilt-tripping phone pledge campaigns.

      "If you watch even one second of PBS and don't contribute, you're a thief!"

      Haha, but really, PBS should consider bittorrent as a means of distribution, especially since they don't rely on ads in the first place.

    3. Re:My question: by xenotrout · · Score: 1

      When I first watched PBS, they had no real commercials. Just telathons every once in a while. They have started announcing corporate sponsorships between shows, but still no real commercials. So this show is very unlikely to include commercials.

    4. Re:My question: by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Will it include commercials? If it does, and advertisers are still willing to pay even if the show is not being distrubuted via standard means (i.e. television), then we may be witnessing the beginning of a new era of advertising. Kind of like what Google did with Adwords.

      PBS shows, being public television, can not have commercials. What they have are underwriter credits instead. There is a difference between the two, but it can be murky at times. Basic difference, underwriter credits are a promo for the company (brought to you by....) but can not have any products advertised in it. Commercials on the other hand are advertisements for poducts.

      That said, I have no idea if it will be distributed with underwriter credits. Most likely, you would have to ask the producers/producing station.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    5. Re:My question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since this is not an actual television show, there is no requirement for PBS to provide it in a non-commercial fashion.

      On the other hand, I suspect the show will have underwriting messages similar to non-commercial television, just to not get people too upset.

    6. Re:My question: by mkw87 · · Score: 1

      Actually in place of commercials they are going to give self defense tips to keep the REALLY geeky nerds from losing their lunch money and/or getting beat up at work.

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
  16. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if Cringely will wear some of his fluorescent polo shirts?

  17. The Future Of NerdTV by JohnPerkins · · Score: 4, Funny

    It will gradually build its own cast of ecclectic personalities, building a loyal fanbase. Eventually it will reach a critical point at which it starts to slide more into the mainstream. This of course will be its doom as actual nerds are replaced by increasingly bland and mediocre television personalities. Then end will come when that scion of drek, G4, buys NerdTV out.

    No, i'm not feeling hostile. Why do you ask?

    1. Re:The Future Of NerdTV by Joehonkie · · Score: 1

      Make sure that everyone who comes on later is EXTREME. And have lots of visits by celebrities who claim to really like things but when actually questioned about them present no real knowledge or understanding of the subject.

    2. Re:The Future Of NerdTV by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1

      I'm feeling pretty damn hostile. Those bastards took away Martin Sargent.

    3. Re:The Future Of NerdTV by Jerf · · Score: 1

      I know what you're talking about.

      But... consider that the reason that occurs is the pressures caused by the distribution mechanism, which strongly favor$ mainstream distribution over niche.

      This starts out from day one depending on BitTorrent, which strongly (though not quite) entirely flattens the costs to the creator for mainstream vs. niche.

      There is reason to hope this will never suffer that fate, as long as the same people stay in charge, because it can afford to stay niche. Then again, if they get too experimental and successful with the advertising, it could replicate the G4 slide.

      Only one way to find out. Worth keeping an eye on. A lot of people have been saying this is the path... soon we'll have hard data.

    4. Re:The Future Of NerdTV by Aquamouth · · Score: 0

      i remember when G4 and TechTV merged and i complained about this and a friend of mine was like, "oh be quiet, techtv has too many reruns." and now a few years later, he complains about how techtv was taken over. it really pisses me off. it still does. long live TechTV! I wonder if nerd nation would air on NerdTV. I loved that show.

      --
      und das ist alle fur jetz
  18. This could really help P2P. by ZSpade · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If more programs start jumping on the p2p bandwagon, then it's going to start getting harder and harder to pass laws against it under the argument that it is only used for illegally trading files.

    The success of this show may directly effect the future of p2p, and the internet as we know it; because if it does make it, others will likely follow suit.

    --
    Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
    1. Re:This could really help P2P. by seramar · · Score: 1

      I think you meant jumping on the p2p band-WIDTH!

      --
      australian project gutenberg is better than the original.
  19. Bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would be great if they used bittorrent to distribute the programming. The more valid legal reasons for bittorrent to exist the better.

  20. More of a franchise model by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Not so much licence, as they will aquire franchise rights - So ESR and Stallman will alternate nights, with Cowboy Neal the 'man on the street' interviewer.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:More of a franchise model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will adopt "Free" or "Open", depending on who puts clothes back on first.

      Just imagining the sight... Oh, the humanity!

  21. Kinda Like What The Screen Savers old Crew.. by rahlquist · · Score: 4, Informative

    ....is doing at http://twit.tv

    --
    Sick of stupidity? http://www.patentlystupid.com
    1. Re:Kinda Like What The Screen Savers old Crew.. by voorko02 · · Score: 1

      ...or in video form at systm.org

    2. Re:Kinda Like What The Screen Savers old Crew.. by ShortBeard · · Score: 0

      I just went to twit tv and followed the twit blogs link and Behold! John C. Dvorak is a twit!

  22. Bill Joy not prominent Nerd, but prominent Luddite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't wait to make my own 'remixed' versions of Cringely's show

    That would be truly hilarious. But if you want real fun with remixing, do it with the Bill Joy + Andy Hertzfeld content, since they are exact opposites, the first a born-again Luddite wanting to cease all technical progress (now that he's made his millions), and the second a pretty normal progressive techie.

    The result would probably rival Monty Python ... :-)

  23. Seeding by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 0

    It really will be interesting now that this has been on Slashdot to see how many seeders there will be after the show goes up...

    Get ready to max out your 6 mbit lines!

  24. What defines non-commercial distribution? by redphive · · Score: 1

    Could a cable company broadcast it in an available channel slot? Perhaps throw it in the mix of its community programming?

    Any one have some answers on that?

    1. Re:What defines non-commercial distribution? by Baricom · · Score: 1

      IANAL.

      Creative Commons seems to define non-commercial as activity that is "primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation." To me, that sounds like pretty broad protection - you could argue that if the cable company distributes it, even when included in the basic package, they are gaining "commercial advantage" because it provides an incentive for people to subscribe to their service.

      On the other hand, you (not the cable company) might be able to broadcast it on public access, provided the presenter isn't gaining a "commercial advantage" themselves. I think this would be possible where I live, except that the underwriting at the beginning and end of the program would probably be too commercial for their policies.

    2. Re:What defines non-commercial distribution? by redphive · · Score: 1

      I work for a cable company that already carries a PBS feed from Seattle and Detroit (we are a Canadian Cable Co). We also have a community/public access channel both in Canada and a small 600 home network in Polint Roberts Washington. It would be kind of cool if we could provide this, in the wee hours if people were keen on that.

      I suppose too that we could also just host a torrent or provide support for that.

  25. Finally... by cobrajs · · Score: 1

    Usually, I despise watching Television. But this would be something worth watching/downloading.
    And another reason to get a new handheld video player!

    (I think there should be /.TV! But, then again, there is not enough time to show all the comments.)

    1. Re:Finally... by cashman73 · · Score: 1
      Do we really want to see CmdrTaco and CowboyNeal on our TV sets? Seriously,... bad idea! Plus, there wouldn't be all that many new shows, either,... mainly just repeats, considering how many dupes we get from the slashdot "editors"!

    2. Re:Finally... by KenBot_314 · · Score: 1

      Judging by some of the comments around here, I don't think I would want to actually SEE any of the ppl involved with /.

    3. Re:Finally... by bizard · · Score: 1
      (I think there should be /.TV! But, then again, there is not enough time to show all the comments.)

      don't you mean not enough time to show all the dupes?

    4. Re:Finally... by ZSpade · · Score: 1

      it's at times like this when I find myself sad to be without mod points, not that it matters, already posted here. +1 funny if I could.

      But seriously /. has the audience to pull off something like /. TV, but if it failed, or it was poorly made it could hurt /.

      Not to mention the cost of production! It might be something like half what /. pays for bandwidth! And that's nothing to shake a / at.

      --
      Go ahead and call me unreliable; reliable is just a synonym for predictable.
  26. Creative Commons License by ehaggis · · Score: 0

    Does this mean I can I recompile it? Do I get the source? What if it shows up in SCO code?

    --
    One ring to bind them - should probably have more fiber and less rings in their diet.
    1. Re:Creative Commons License by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      What if it shows up in SCO code?

      Why should it? Nothing else does.

  27. Nerd TV by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 3, Funny

    I want my...

    I want my...

    I want my Nerd TV.

    1. Re:Nerd TV by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      Me too, but is it in stereo already?

  28. First we get Morgan Freeman going over, by crovira · · Score: 3, Interesting

    now we get NerdTV. (You know you need the 'bleeding edge' and early adopters before you get to the generally accessible fun stuff, but since they're not time-locked, it doesn't matter when you 'discover' a series.)

    Wait until producers realize that they can use broadband and a content aggregator or Google to skip the entire 'kowtow and then bend-over facing the other way' process that they go through with the current lot of content disseminators.

    No more canceled shows until there's no audience for them, not the current trade-off of "we can squeeze more profits with pushing ads on schlock than we can with your high concept stuff, so piss off."

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:First we get Morgan Freeman going over, by eddy · · Score: 1

      >First we get Morgan Freeman going over

      I'm sorry, I must have missed something terribly important. Morgan Freeman is now a nerd? Or what/where did he go over to?

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    2. Re:First we get Morgan Freeman going over, by nebaz · · Score: 1

      He used to be on the Electric Company.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  29. Not being broadcast? by slapout · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Beginning Sept. 6, PBS will make available - exclusively over the Internet - broadcast television's first entirely downloadable series"

    So it won't actually be airing on PBS, just on the internet?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Not being broadcast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "First Entirely Downloadable"? Unlike the 493 other TV-shows available via Kazaa?

    2. Re:Not being broadcast? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Piss off. Content that people actually WANT you to download is superior to content you're getting illegally. Don't scare them away. :P

      --
      It's been a long time.
  30. SlashdotTV coming September 6th... ish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We're pleased to be offering this new video-download news format free to Slashdot customers." said CmdrTaco, who would not indicate whether he was hard or soft-shell, "It is another example of how Slashdot is on the fringe of digital news."

    When asked why viewers should get their video news from Slashdot rather than going straight to PBS and downloading the whole news program, CmdrTaco replied "Well, we know our Slashdot readers are busy. Some of them can only check the site 10-12 times a day, and as everyone knows they don't have time to read the articles. So what we've done is cut out everything but 10 seconds of the interview, the best inflammatory bits we can find, and then added an audio-only cynical or sarcastic comment at the end, with an occasional 'Linux is getting better every day' comment for good measure. We tried video footage using a web cam for the comment, but it was, well, kinda creepy."

    CmdrTaco also said Slashdot is working on another new feature called Slashdot ReMix, where existing news items are posted by different Slashdot editor and given a slightly different spin, to see how different angles of the story are received. Perceptive Slashdotters, he noted, have noticed this system in beta testing over the past few years, with more heavy testing in the last 1-2 years. He believes the system is now nearing perfection.

    1. Re:SlashdotTV coming September 6th... ish by paintballluvr · · Score: 1

      Put's a whole new spin on goatse trolls, huh?

    2. Re:SlashdotTV coming September 6th... ish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad there isn't a bash.org-style archive of funny as hell /. posts, because the parent clearly should be in anyone's Top 10... probably Top 3.

      Laughed so hard I choked.

    3. Re:SlashdotTV coming September 6th... ish by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

      sheer brilliance!

  31. The kittens are safe! by borawjm · · Score: 2, Funny


    For some reason I don't think that there will be any kittens sacrificed because of this program.

    --

  32. TechTV by peter303 · · Score: 1

    There used to be a whole cable TV channel devoted to nerds called Tech TV. (The name, but not the shows or people was sold in 2004.)

    1. Re:TechTV by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

      "(The name, but not the shows or people was sold in 2004.)"

      Good thing it's only the name they sold, because I think it's illegal to sell people.

    2. Re:TechTV by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "There used to be a whole cable TV channel devoted to nerds called Tech TV. (The name, but not the shows or people was sold in 2004.)"

      Wanna be nerds, actually. They didn't talk enough about Linux, BSD, or anything. Hell, the whole thing was "windows" oriented.

      Did you ever notice the "cool program of the day" suprisingly was never an Linux app (and never a Mac apple too I believe)

      And the commercials, they'd play MS commercials all the time.

      If they don't include Linux as an important part of their program -- then they are NOT a show for geeks. Any true geek has heard of Linux/UNIX/BSD -- and an uber geek uses them.

    3. Re:TechTV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...don't know when you were watching, it might have been during the "last gasp" days of TechTV...but I watched plenty TSS shows that spoke of Linux, even showing a complete Linus Distro install on one show...

  33. Broadband quote from article by slapout · · Score: 1

    Cringely noted, "With more than half of American homes with Internet access now using broadband"

    So when will website designers start to realize that half of us aren't able to get broadband?

    --
    Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    1. Re:Broadband quote from article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "So when will website designers start to realize that half of us aren't able to get broadband?"

      ha HA you n00b! you just have to call the cable or telephone company! they will install it, usually only having to flip a switch! took me years to figure that out too so dont feel bad!

  34. Creative Commons....w00t! by gearmonger · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Cringely and PBS say that noncommercial use and redistribution will be allowed."

    Excellent! Now the nattering naybobs of negativism here at work, who currently have conniptions whenever I try to use something from TV in the classroom, can't complain. Well, they can still complain, I just won't have to comply.

  35. I Agree! by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

    As a sysadmin supporting programmers, I totally agree! I do actually enjoy hanging out and working with programmers. Now I can hear about even more!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  36. Other PBS Shows by GraffitiKnight · · Score: 1

    How about offering other PBS shows for download. My mom TiVo's "America's Test Kitchen" every weekend, and I enjoy watching MotorWeek. It would be nice to just download them, burn to a CD, etc.

    1. Re:Other PBS Shows by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

      Austin City Limits would be cool too - especially in Hi definition.

    2. Re:Other PBS Shows by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      There are several for streaming. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/view/ 51 Frontline episodes. Some Nova stuff as well http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/programs.html Still no downloading due to "rights issues" though. I suppose you could use a streamripper. The quality isn't that good. Streaming is better than nothing though.

  37. It's Cringly Though... by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, I tried to like him, but Cringely is a hack. He makes wild ass guesses and long winded posts about things like getting Wifi from a neighbor and why are we suposed to care again? /. posts links to his garbage at least weekly, if /. is getting cash from these posts to Cringely, I think they should tell us.

    Remeber Cringely famously posted in 1998 that the iMac launch was going to fail.

    "For one thing, it is very doubtful that there will be enough of the machines to go around. Apple's expectation, I have read over and over, is to sell 400,000 of the machines right away. I hope they do. They plan to have at least the first 30,000 of these machines in stores by next Friday. That, I doubt. As of last week, only about 5,000 iMacs had been produced. And a random sampling showed an out-of-box failure rate of 11 percent, which is vastly above Apple and the industry's average. These are just teething problems, sure, but they are problems nonetheless. You'll see stories about them."

    We didn't see stories about them because it was all bull.

    1. Re:It's Cringly Though... by statemachine · · Score: 1

      I'm not defending anyone here, but I am setting the record straight because the parent is full of bull. "Remeber [sic] Cringely famously posted in 1998 that the iMac launch was going to fail." Nowhere did Cringely say in his article that the iMac launch was doomed. Here, read the whole article that the parent conveniently neglected to link. Heck, even in the quote the parent used, there's nothing about lack of demand, or the souring of consumer opinion, only concerns about initial supply. "We didn't see stories about them because it was all bull." The parent has a short memory. Anyone paying attention to Apple knew about their supply problems. Here's an article I found in 30 seconds by using Google titled "Supply problems persist for Apple" from C|Net, dated November 4, 1999. You want a complaint from 1998? Here's another that mentions, you guessed it, supply problems. "The biggest problem with the weekend festivities, as you can imagine, was that there were not enough iMacs to go around." More supply problems.

  38. Die G4 Die by TRRosen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cool now if this catches on (and it will) we might be able to get some real Tech shows. I would love to see Laporte and the gang do a video podcast so I can try and erase the any thoughts of "attack of the show" out of my mind. Ewwwwww!!!!!!!!! Bad TV man.... Bad TV

    1. Re:Die G4 Die by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      Yes, we need someone to build a TV podcasting program based on Bittorrent. PBS should have an RSS feed with the torrent files, and then your TV cast software will start downloading the torrent with each new release. Combining podcasting and bittorrent would be very nice for Nerd TV in so many ways.

  39. Badge of honor? by paintballluvr · · Score: 1

    It would seem to take their ability to use it as a derogatory term away if it's embraced, a badge of honor even.

    Joe Shmoe sees us wearing it as a badge of honor, wouldn't see someone else calling us a nerd as an insult to us. Thus, it doesn't have the intended effect.

    That's just my take on it.

  40. Bastard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm hungry for Tacos. Mmmm.. soft taco.

  41. Re:When did it become ok ? [KNOCK IT OFF!!!] by ryanvm · · Score: 1

    I'm a gay, black, geek - you insensitive clod!

  42. Leo Laporte by frode · · Score: 3, Interesting


    They should add Leo Laporte to the line up. He was one of the few good things on TechTV.

    --
    I have no .Sig
    1. Re:Leo Laporte by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And still is on the Canadian G4TechTV & some Aussie channel. Call For Help 2.0 is great, it's all Tech constantly. And with guests like Steve Gibson making regular appearances as well.

  43. There are too many stations by John+Seminal · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I remember when I first got cable. I loved having an extra 30 channels. MTV played music.

    Now, channles often have nothing to do with what they are named. MTV might as well be reality TV... 4 episodes of Real World followed by 4 episodes of Road Rules, followed by 8 episodes of Real World versus Road Rules. Ugh. Then, for the 200th time a repeat of "When the 80's ruled".

    But here is what gets me pissed off. Did everyone hear MTV is now using the money we paid (through watching the advertising) to start a new tv network for gays and weirdo's.

    Same thing with a Nerd network. Do we really need it? How about haveing The Learning Channel and Discovery channel having real science programming? Has either station ever played The Mechanical Universe? I know it is PBS programming, but they show it at 2am once a week on a friday. Or what about either of those two stations following NASA? Or having a weekly tech show. Instead, TLC is airing Trading Spaces, a show where two neighbors redecorate their houses, and then suprise each other (How do you like it, I knew you would love your living room painted lime green).

    Names are meaningless today. Just like when government passes the Patriot Act. They just pick a popular name for marketing purposes, it really does not tell you much about what it is. They should have called it the Terrorism Prevention Act, it would come a little closer to the truth, or better yet Lets Take Away All Civil Liberties Act.

    I don't need 100 channels. I need 10 good ones. Give me a true science and tech channel. Give me one true news station, and not an editorial station. I already have ESPN, they are pretty good with sports. I think you could combine FoodTV and Home and Garden to have one channel, on Living (Do we really need 6 episodes of $40 dollars a day, highly offensive to me, as I watch this woman suffer to feed herself on only $40 each day, while I live off $4 a day).

    Toss in a movie station for a 5th station.

    And while we are at it, some RULES for all TV stations to follow. #1, get rid of the laugh track. It is not funny when a character comes on stage. I don't need a pre-recorded laughing sound to know when to laugh or what is funny. Are people that stupid that most laugh because they hear laughing? Once you hear the laugh track, and you become aware of it, it will ruin all your shows. It will become very annoying.

    Rule #2, No more advertising while a TV show is airing. I don't mean commercials. I mean the boxes that pop up and take 1/9th of the screen with an advertising for what is on TV next. Or what movie is playing this weekend. Or even the ones that identify what station you are watching. I know what station I am watching.

    Rule #3, Don't cut off the end credits to a show. Some of us want to know who an actor on a show was. Some of us hate the screen splitting, with an advertising on the opposite side. Some of us want to take the last minute to enjoy what we just saw, as we watch the credits.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:There are too many stations by assassinator42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, TLC now sucks. I don't want trading spaces, I want Junkyard Wars, maybe some forensics show, etc. And Discovery has the Americna Chopper show. I don't care about motorcycles. There is the Discovery Science channel though. I watch some stuff on there. The once great tech channel known as ZDTV has now become G4, a shell of it's former self. A variety of channels is good though. I like watching game shows, and GSN still has enough from Game Show Network to be a good channel. I also love watching cartoons, and I like having multiple channels. I've never even heard of this $40 a day though. Seeing as how you hate it so much, as I probably would as well, why not just stay away from it? Does FoodTV actually have anything worth watching? BTW, surprised no one has attacked you on your comment about gays.

    2. Re:There are too many stations by radish · · Score: 1

      BTW, surprised no one has attacked you on your comment about gays.

      There's really no point arguing with blikered morons, it's a waste of time.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    3. Re:There are too many stations by jez9999 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Did everyone hear MTV is now using the money we paid (through watching the advertising) to start a new tv network for gays and weirdo's.
      Darn. But, it's not as bad as the BBC using British people's TV licence fees to create its ASIAN Network.

    4. Re:There are too many stations by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      "#1, get rid of the laugh track. It is not funny when a character comes on stage. I don't need a pre-recorded laughing sound to know when to laugh or what is funny. Are people that stupid that most laugh because they hear laughing? Once you hear the laugh track, and you become aware of it, it will ruin all your shows. It will become very annoying."

      It's been scientifically proven that hearing laughing makes you mentally want to join in and laugh too. There's research for it. Google it.

      As for your other points, I agree completley.

  44. I'll Give It A Shot by blankmeyer · · Score: 1

    With all the crap that is readily available on television, it is good to see a show that might actually have a chance at being decent. I'll watch the first couple installments and see how it goes. Good to see the use of the Creative Commons License as well as the online availability. Anyone who can get the network (even PBS) to agree to those two conditions has to have a good head on his shoulders.

  45. Nerd or Geek by globaljustin · · Score: 1

    NerdTV? Give me a break. Wasn't there someone around to help these socially challenged people to come up with a better name? Nerds just suck, geeks get things done.

    --
    Thank you Dave Raggett
  46. IntelligenTV by Sliptwixt · · Score: 1

    I hate to get all "liberal" and whatnot, but does it have to be "NerdTV"? Personally, I got over the cuteness of terms "nerd" and "geek" about 5 years ago. Using "nerd" just undermines the whole thing IMO.

    1. Re:IntelligenTV by fgb · · Score: 1

      Whenever I watched TechTV my wife would always say "are you watching nerd tv again?".

      I can just imagine what she will say now. :-)

    2. Re:IntelligenTV by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1
      Using "nerd" just undermines the whole thing IMO.
      You're posting to a site called News for Nerds.
      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  47. Re:Bill Joy not prominent Nerd, but prominent Ludd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nah, if you wanted real contrast, you would like up quotes from Bill Joy with quotes from Ray Kurtzweill, hero the the "transhumanist" movement which thinks we will all get to live to be 200 as cyborgs if we just take the modest step of cutting our own nards off... or something like that. I can only read so much of any transhuman web site before it starts to sound like ranting of the "Time Cube" variety.

  48. Blues for Nerds? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    How many nerds prefer watching TV to, say, a bloviating website full of typos and dup's? How many geeks?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  49. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  50. Connections! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd just be happy if I could get a copy of James Burke's Connections. Man, that was a good series.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Connections! by Knara · · Score: 1
      I'm fairly certain that Amazon carries it. I know that at least a year or so ago the channel that carried it (was it TLC? Or was it A&E at the time that carried it) was selling it online.

      Great couple series that, though. I miss those days.

    2. Re:Connections! by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      I'd just be happy if I could get a copy of James Burke's Connections. Man, that was a good series.

      While I thought Connections was a rather poor follow-up, might I recommend the Day the Universe Changed? It's a bit dated, but still good stuff, and can be had on eMule/eDonkey.

  51. You had my interest, really you did by mcc · · Score: 1

    You had my interest with this, really, you did.

    Then you said the word "Cringely".

    Now I don't care about this anymore.

    ;shrug;

  52. We found out to early by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish they would stop letting us know so many weeks in advance. I am so impatient!!! I wish we found on sept. 5th.

    Dave

  53. Oh...My.....God! by tacokill · · Score: 1

    That process took my breath away.

    Not the part where you actually explained it, rather, the part where I realized I understood everything you were speaking about. If you do too, then congrats. You're a nerd.

    Always remember that for 95% of the population, your reply might as well have been in Alien pig latin. Yes. Computers are THAT foreign and scary to people. :-)

  54. Hertzfeld is a god (High praise from an atheist.) by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    Here's a five second primer on Andy Hertzfeld from Wikipedia:

    One of four of the original primary software architects of Mac OS

    Created the MagicCap OS (it had a really cool/funky GUI and AFAIK is sadly complete dead)

    Founded Eazel in 1999, which gave us the Nautilus file manager for the GNOME.

    'Nuff said.

    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  55. Wil Wheaton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm all for it if they can convince Wil to show up at least once.

  56. High Tech Heroes by Teh+Suq · · Score: 1

    Reminds me a lot of a local access show I used to watch called "High Tech Heroes".

    http://www.webfoot.com/hobbies/hth.blurb.html

  57. Re:There are NOT too many stations by KrackHouse · · Score: 1
    "I don't need 100 channels. I need 10 good ones."
    What you really need is a tool to separate the good from the bad. Blogdex does this for websites. There will always be crap out there or even good stuff that only you consider crap. I don't think the world should be stuck with ten channels of crap YOU find interesting which, based on your apparent intolerance, would probably include that fishing show on fox and "You might be a redneck if..."
    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  58. Small Plug for Google Video by technix4beos · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is the beginning of the mountain of content that will be soon be online, free of charge.

    Google already knows the future of "television" is shared hosting (via bittorrents, etc) of user-submitted content, and I'm sure Robert Cringley knows this well too.

    Nothing stopping these producers from advertising, and it might even be cheaper to maintain an online presence than to broadcast the show the regular way.

    I'd like to candidly plug my own small contribution to internet video here:

    BeGeistert 14 Interview with yellowTAB

    --
    user@host$ diff /dev/urandom /dev/uspto
  59. I know by Anyletter · · Score: 0

    I know a lot of nerds who won't ever be cuming. Not even in september

  60. Don't mean to burst everyone's bubble but... by FoXDie · · Score: 1

    ...remember when the news about a video game network came around?

  61. Bring back the TechTv crew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...get Leo Laporte and Patrick Norton on board, and I'll watch it every night. Man, I miss the old Screensaver Show. Can hardly stand the replacement show, whatever they call it now on G4...

  62. My birthday is the 6th by pro547 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    yes this show would come out on my birthday how cool?

  63. Hertzfeld deserves more credit than Jobs by typical · · Score: 1

    Hertzfeld (and Woz, Raskin, and similar) are a lot more responsible for the amazing technical strides made by Apple than Jobs, who inexplicably seems to get the lion's share of the glory. Jobs is notable for (a) cheating his "friend" Woz out of their shared earnings on the first Apples, (b) always blowing his own horn as loudly as possible and appearing in as many magazines as possible, (c) being an incredible prick towards those who worked with him, (d) refusing to acknowledge the daughter he fathered out of wedlock. He is not a Nice Person.

    --
    Any program relying on (nontrivial) preemptive multithreading will be buggy.
    1. Re:Hertzfeld deserves more credit than Jobs by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      Hertzfeld deserves more credit than Jobs

      For his work or just being a better human being? =)

      Jobs is the Phineas Taylor Barnum of the computer world. Hertzfeld, Woz and Raskin have heart and soul, something Jobs sold off at a yard sale in the 70's. While everyone rags on Gates (as they should) Jobs IMO was cut from the same mold.

      Your comments are right on the mark.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  64. Hope it shows Big Brother Eugene Nerd superhero! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope it features Eugene who is now a superhero amoung nerds in the UK. He never stops talking from engineering to caravan races!!!

    Any peeps in the UK will know who I mean!

  65. Some synonyms are better than others? by AtlanticGiraffe · · Score: 1

    Personally, I hate the supersized "politically correct" phrases a lot more than short synonyms, which a few wackos find offensive just because they're short. If you're a nigger, a nerd or a fag, you'd better get used to being that.

    "Nigger" and "African-American person" are synonyms. Neither one is more "offensive" or "politically incorrect" than the other. One's just shorter.

  66. It has been done before. by visi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Check out http://www.legaltorrents.com/index.htm There is a program called Go Open.

    Their claim to fame was that it is the worlds first ever TV Program dedicated to "All things Open Source."
    It includes interviews with major open-source figures such as Richard Stallman, Lawrence Lessig, Jon 'maddog' Hall, and Bruce Perens, as well as case studies and discussions of Shuttleworth's Ubuntu Linux.

    --
    "If only smart people like your shit, it ain't that smart."
  67. Re:There are NOT too many stations by twosmokes · · Score: 1

    Blogdex [blogdex.net] does this for websites.

    No, blogdex does that for blogs, which means you can pretty much ignore all of it.

  68. Re:There are NOT too many stations by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    U R Dumb. Go to blogdex, most of it is from news websites or other things. Some blogs are linked to but less than half.

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  69. Some programming ideas by superflippy · · Score: 1
    --
    Your fantasies contain the seeds of important concepts.
  70. Ah, it's been released. But so expensive! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I believe it was TLC; I had a stack of VHS tapes that a friend of a friend with cable had made.

    Ah, you're right. It's available, though $150 is a mite steep. Amazon carries it used for around $100 per series. Gleep. VHS will run something around $70 each. Still gleep.

    Ah, and I recall The Day the Universe Changed as well. Available for the low, low price of $750. Educational pricing is a racket.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  71. Re:There are NOT too many stations by twosmokes · · Score: 1

    I R Not dum. From the blogdex.com about page:

    Blogdex is a research project of the MIT Media Laboratory tracking the diffusion of information through the weblog community.

    Who R Dum now? And really, is typing the four extra charaters to magically transform your post into English that difficult?

  72. Re:There are NOT too many stations by KrackHouse · · Score: 1

    U R Still Dumb. It tracks things that blogers link to. Last I checked blogs aren't restricted to only linking to other blogs?

    --
    What if Digg added local news and a Slashdot inspired comment karma system? ---
    http://houndwire.com
  73. Re:There are NOT too many stations by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    U cud B trying 2 give the secret of life and U would still B a jackass for trying 2 abbreviate three letter words. kthxbye.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  74. Thanks! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 1

    I'm off to score mad educational goodness from eMule...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca