Slashdot Mirror


Glide Effortless to Compete in File Sharing Market

Dotnaught writes "InformationWeek is running a story about a new consumer application suite called Glide Effortless that's slated to be released in mid-November. Think of it as iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iCal, Mail, document sharing, shopping, and a few other apps all in one seamless application hosted as a service on the Web that could be accessed by any browser on any computer. It allows file sharing without the risk of illegal copying. It might prove a viable competitor to iTunes, if it works as advertised and if it can scale to handle millions of users."

160 comments

  1. security concerns... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... as I glide effortlessly to fp! Suck it!

  2. OK, fine by Hey+Pope+Felcher+.+. · · Score: 5, Funny

    In fact, Leka explains, the system is smart enough to identify copyrighted music that has been uploaded by users into the system.

    Err, how exactly?

    Does it listen out for generic beats, mixed with generic vocalizations of generic lyrics, flavoured out by massive over production?

    1. Re:OK, fine by AvantLegion · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Does it listen out for generic beats, mixed with generic vocalizations of generic lyrics, flavoured out by massive over production?

      You know, that would work far better than a Slashdot-posted joke should...

    2. Re:OK, fine by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Storing all of your private data on a stranger's computer for a fee, remotely accessible, granting permission to scan everything you have (so clearly it's only so private to begin with, right?) for allegedly copyrighted material (who knows how they know if it's copyrighted by YOU or someone else or if you're allowed to use it or if it's just a PHOTO of Metallica when you saw them backstage)...

      Hell, what could possibly go wrong?!

    3. Re:OK, fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      But the hilarious part is surely this:

      It allows file sharing without the risk of illegal copying.

      Yeah, the great risk of illegal copying. Everytime you start your DC client and search for (and subsequently download) the latest movies, you must understand that you you risk actually getting them. The horror!

      PR people can spin just about anything. Submitters too. :)

    4. Re:OK, fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      actually, I know these guys just partnered with a company that i recently worked for called Mediaguide. They are an ASCAP owned company that monitors radio and TV airplay for playlist logs. Their technology can very easily scan through mediafiles and identify what song it is.. even tell the difference between original and remix versions of different songs. Check out thei site if you want more info.. www.mediaguide.com

    5. Re:OK, fine by StopSayingYouSir · · Score: 1
      Um, how exactly is this funny? It doesn't make any sense at all.

      I can only assume you were trying to make fun of top 40 music, but the phrase "copyrighted music" is just a tiny bit broader than that.

    6. Re:OK, fine by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Err, how exactly?"

      Three words: Amazon Magic Turk.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    7. Re:OK, fine by aliquis · · Score: 1

      No, that's probably non-copyrighted music since the work has to reach a certain level or artism, or haven't it? (i'm not sure, but most music is so crappy it should be free.)

  3. Any browser? by ASUSanator · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it work in lynx? :P

    1. Re:Any browser? by nwf · · Score: 1

      Probably about as well as Windows Media Player on the desktop.

      --
      I don't know, but it works for me.
    2. Re:Any browser? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So, is anyone else getting tired of these Slashvertisement product announcements on the /. front page?

      Geez, go to Digg.com for all the up to the minute tech news that you're missing if you only stick around here (the press is already labeling it a "Slashdot killer").

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    3. Re:Any browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few people will leave slashdot I think. Slashdot is like a pothole. Sure, it can be fixed with some cement, but people will just complain instead. Everybody needs something to complain about.

    4. Re:Any browser? by chavo+valdez · · Score: 1

      So, is anyone else getting tired of these Slashvertisement product announcements on the /. front page? Geez, go to Digg.com [digg.com] for all the up to the minute tech news that you're missing if you only stick around here (the press is already labeling it a "Slashdot killer"). --

      No I'm not at all tired of the Slashvertisement as you call them. If I were I wouldn't come here.

      I don't think that the majority of the people come here for "up to the minute tech news". We come for the commentary from our fellow geeks. We come to pick each others brains in hopes of exposing some new angle or insight.

    5. Re:Any browser? by Moofie · · Score: 1

      How about YOU go over there and leave the rest of us alone?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Any browser? by tpgp · · Score: 1

      So, is anyone else getting tired of these Slashvertisement product announcements on the /. front page?

      Hmmmmn, are you really sure that "Glide Effortless" paid Slashdot to have us call them vapourware hang shit on its name and business ethics?

      --
      My pics.
    7. Re:Any browser? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      If you're getting tired of "these Slashvertisement product announcements on the /. front page", go elsewhere. As in, LEAVE SLASHDOT.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    8. Re:Any browser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Slashdot is here to stay. Digg seems to be geared towards less "techie" crowds. I tend to see a lot of Nintendo stories on it, rather than debates over quantum computers.

    9. Re:Any browser? by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      Why don't you take a look at this comment and get back to me?

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
    10. Re:Any browser? by PHPfanboy · · Score: 1

      the press. WTF do the press know? they're just stupid humans like the rest of us.
      (I guess I'm supposed to say "Yay blogs" or something trendy like that at this point)

      --
      29 mpg. YMMV.
  4. Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I prefer to store data on my own computer, for privacy reasons. I will not use these services for sensitive, private data, because I do not know who else has access to said data. And I see no point in using their service only for non-sensitive needs, while returning to my existing solutions for private matters.

    I doubt their service offers anything beyond what is already possible with a solid Linux or BSD setup, while costing far more and lacking the security I've come to expect.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Read... the.... f*cking... article...

      The software, disclosed in mid-October, is called Glide Effortless. It's a set of 12 applications for content creation, communication, E-commerce, and sharing. The apps are Glide Photos, Glide Music, Glide Video, Glide Docs, Glide AllMedia, Glide Contacts, Glide Calendar, Glide Timeline (Glide's search engine), Glide Mail, Glide Cast (audio, text, and video conferencing), Glide Share, and Glide Shops.

      (emphasis mine) The real hook is that they are talking to media creators - like Disney, ABC, etc - to distribute content directly. They want to be iTunes and a (legal) Napster all rolled into one on top of a suire of applications. Completely browser-based. Very cool indeed.

      -everphilski-

    2. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      You forgot to bold the "content creation" part of the post. They expect users to store their data there. That's why they offer 750 MB of space as part of the package!

      The fact that they're including content distribution facilities does not avoid the other fact that their system may be insecure, and not a suitable place to store sensitive, private data.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First- what is this 'private data' that everyone is so worried about? Kiddie porn? It's not like anyone uses Quicken anymore- you can get banking info on-line. So I always wonder what the heck is so private.

      Other than that, these on-line services provide a few advantages that typical desktop apps don't.

      Portability for one. It would be nice to move around anywhere, and always have my files and applications available to me (with a net connection). Home to work, and to my mom's house for the holidays with all of my stuff available. Not that I would do any work from home, but if I had my pictures and everything else in a place that MADE SENSE then it would be great. I do NOT think it makes sense to put my files on a 'briefcase' type site, because I need to upload/download when I am working on them.

      No install - always up to date. A lot of users would really benefit from this feature. And the $5 per month fee would be a good thing in many cases. Maybe you only need it for a while. Maybe you have a seasonal business and you hire extra workers for part of the year- there could be a lot of reasons. But this would take a big load of work off of the IT people. In fact, many small businesses IT space is in such a shambles, that this would be the only way they can get it together without spending big $$$.

      With these advantages stated, I still think it would be a long time before this becomes standard operating procedure for many people. But with broadband connections becoming more prevalent (c'mon VOIP!) it will just make more and more sense for this stuff to be centralized.

      I have NEVER seen a public school that had a decent IT setup. Every computer lab I've seen has been a disaster...they would be an excellent candidate for this type of service. And if the kids can easily bring their work home, then all the better.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    4. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Financial information is the first thing that comes to mind. Anyone who is serious about investing, for instance, has a multitude of financial data that they need to store, and that often is best kept private.

      Then there is just personal correspondence that is just that: personal. I don't want other people to have easy access to letters I have sent to friends and family. For instance, I don't want others to know that my nephew James has testicular cancer, and may lose his genitals.

      You keep thinking about kiddie porn. Those of us who do not deal with such filth still do have many reasons to keep our data private. Services like these do not offer the privacy that is required, and even with their advantages, the security problems still far outweigh the benefits.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    5. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by bigman2003 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The problem with your nephew James and his testicles....is that nobody cares.

      While yes, it is private- there is really no incentive for anyone to do anything with it. With potentially millions of customers, things like this just fall into the category of 'noise'.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    6. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Since you have that anti-privacy attitude, would you care to allow us to all access your personal computer? After all, if such personal information is just "noise", then I know you'd have no problem allowing us full access.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    7. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by KronicD · · Score: 1

      Why not just use an app like VNC to allow remote connection to your pc?

      --
      "Those who would give up Essential Liberty, to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"
    8. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with you is that you're so stupid that you can't think of examples of private data that users would want to protect and you need the community to spell it out for you. The fact that you think "nobody cares" about his nephew proves how much of an idiot you are. We care as much about the parent posters nephew as we do about you and you're continuous flow of idiotic comments. Why would we listen to you anymore than the parent poster or his nephew when you continuously post idiotic dribble and host a joke of a website?

    9. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      While the above post was marked flamebait there is too much truth to it. Data are very poorly managed behind doors for financial firms, hospitals and credit card companies in general. They have a very high layoff rate in the IT departments and the scale of the data they manage daily is overwhelming. Their IT guys are not the "money-making" group, therefore they are expandable... and so is their data.

    10. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer to store data on my own computer, for privacy reasons. I will not use these services for sensitive, private data, because I do not know who else has access to said data. And I see no point in using their service only for non-sensitive needs, while returning to my existing solutions for private matters. Yeah, me too! Until every single person I know is using it, and I have to choose whether I am able to communicate effectively with my friends or whether my data is private. And while I might be willing to choose the latter, I doubt that most people are. Privacy advocates are not going to win their war through petty complaints. It will take a massive, full-scale, visible public campaign. "1984" was massively successful in the 20th century for making people think about these issues (among others). But it can't compete with 21st century billion dollar PR machines.

    11. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by hoggoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      >I don't want others to know that my nephew James has testicular cancer, and may lose his genitals.

      Uncle Cy, I can't believe you just posted that.
      Dad's right, you are an asshole.
      Don't bothering visiting me in the hospital anymore.

      -James

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    12. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Seumas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You probably don't lock your doors at night, either. Or lock your car door. Or have an alarm system on your car or your home. Or lock any drawers at work. Or use a passcode for your voicemail. Or a pin number for your bank account.

      I mean, nobody would care about your stuff. And with so many cars and homes and drawers and cubicles and bank accounts and voicemail accounts out there, your measely stuff will just get lost in the noise.

    13. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you don't feel the need to have confidential information please post your bank card numbers, credit card numbers, social security number, email addresses, phone numbers, work information, home address, family status and their respective addresses and phone numbers, computer logs and all other personal information. Nobody is likely to use them for anything and they will simply get lost in all the noise....

    14. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Isn't Napster already the legal Napster? Napster is like if a Squidbilly had an inbred child with a vending machine.

    15. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Just make sure you GPG encrypt everything that you put on their servers. Use a 4096 or 8192 bit key to be extra sure they can't get at the data.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    16. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Their IT guys are not the "money-making" group, therefore they are expandable...

      Only around the middle...

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    17. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1
      First- what is this 'private data' that everyone is so worried about? Kiddie porn? It's not like anyone uses Quicken anymore- you can get banking info on-line. So I always wonder what the heck is so private.
      How about people who use a computer to run a business from home. Is that $99/yr going to buy you a service that is HIPAA compliant if you are in the medical business?
    18. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "And I see no point in using their service only for non-sensitive needs, while returning to my existing solutions for private matters."

      a.) Hard drives fail.
      b.) Some of us actually use several different computers where the only common connection is the internet. Myself, I have a desktop, laptop that travels with me, and my workstation at work. I use GMail for sharing stuff between them. I wouldn't mind a better solution.
      c.) Extra options is a good thing, not a bad thing.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    19. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Seumas · · Score: 4, Funny

      Content isn't created. It evolves over millions of years.

    20. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nuts to you!

    21. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Sure...have a look at my computer. You'll find out that I go to worldsex.com a couple times a week. You'd probably also learn this from analyzing the dried up goo on my keyboard.

      You can read my e-mail, which is pretty boring. And maybe look at the Excel spreadsheet of my college credits, and see that I do very poorly in math. (And by viewing my e-mail, you'll see that I've been going to college since 1986 and still don't have my degree.)

      Let's see what else...I lost about $6,000 in a really bad purchase of Krispy Kreme stock, but more than made up for it with big gains in Wells Fargo and Pepsi. You'll also find that I have recently moved a big chunk of money into a money market account, and a 2-year CD.

      The money market account is actually to pay for in-vitro fertilization (already paid, but you'll see the record of that), and to off-set the first two years of my wife's income when she takes off work after in-vitro. The CD (higher return, longer commitment) will cover the following 3-4 years.

      And finally, if you re-analyze the dried up goo from my keyboard, you will find that the reason we are going through in-vitro is that there is no sperm in my semen...due to a previous vasectomy.

      That...and is about all you'll learn...unless you really dig into Worldsex, and you'll find out that I have a penchant for sites labeled 'hot young cutie' and the occasional 'blacks on blonde' sites which I am slightly embarassed about.

      I just saved you the trouble of digging through my computer- that's the best stuff you'll find.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    22. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by bigman2003 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dear A/C-

      Thanks for visiting my website. Sorry you didn't like it.

      Too bad you don't know the difference between 'dribble' and 'drivel'. Who the heck are you, Ali G? Are there really springs in those balls?

      You should take a look at my story about the car show there aren't a lot of words to read. You might do better with that one.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    23. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like anyone uses Quicken anymore- you can get banking info on-line. So I always wonder what the heck is so private.

      You are poor, idiotic and a know-it-all. Congratulations, you hit the slashdot trifecta.

    24. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      What is so wrong with your wife that you cannot fuck her, and instead must resort to masturbating to Internet pornography?

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    25. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      First- what is this 'private data' that everyone is so worried about? Kiddie porn?

      Maybe you're the kind that thinks being on Big Brother would be 'cool'. Maybe you're the kind of guy who talks openly about everything including but not limited to your sex life chatting in your cell phone on public transportation (Yes, I hear you without trying to listen in because I'm sitting in the seat right in front of you in what would be normal talking distance). Maybe you're the kind that is so completely oblivious to broadcasting your personal life everywhere, that you don't understand why people would possibly want or need privacy. Or maybe you're just a troll trying to flamebait, I can't make up my mind.

      I want privacy for privacy's sake. I doubt you'd see anything that would get much more than a yawn out of the BB viewers, but I still wouldn't want to be on it. And I tend to make any reasonably personal call where it is in fact a personal conversation between me and someone else. Likewise, I don't think you'd find much interesting in my documents, but that doesn't mean I want someone else I don't know to go rifling through them. Why? Because it's my life, and none of your fscking business. Just because you don't appriciate it, some of us actually do.

      How fundamental is privacy? Universal declaration of human rights, article 12. Fourth amendment of the US constitution. Do you think they included that to protect all the kiddie porn hoarders? But if that's what you want to believe, go ahead. You'd better go check on the kids though, there seems to be an aaaaaaaaaaaaawful lot of pedos out there...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    26. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like they say, 90% of all men masturbate and the other 10% lie.

      Is this the private information you are trying to hide? The fact that you masturbate?

      Get over it asshole.

    27. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by philmck · · Score: 1

      Agreed, there are some things that need to be kept secret despite being perfectly legal and moral, a fact that governments seem incapable of realising. But you shouldn't be leaving sensitive stuff unprotected on a personal computer either - the chances of someone breaking into your house and taking your PC are probably comparable to the chances of a "serious" data centre being hacked. I'm amazed people don't use GnuPG and other encryption technologies more - they would never dream of sending the sensitive information they do electronically, in the physical world (no envelopes for anything??). I guess if it's made easy enough (like Skype) they will.

      --
      Phil McKerracher
    28. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Ithika · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty obvious that that is not the private information he wishes to hide. Cos if it is he's really going the wrong way about it...

    29. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious. Thanks for the laugh. I needed that.

    30. Re:Storing data on my own computer. by elrous0 · · Score: 1
      Content isn't created. It evolves over millions of years.

      Well, that's one theory. Yet another is that a mysterious sky deity simply made it happen because he felt like it.

      -Eric

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. TransMedia Corp by taskforce · · Score: 5, Informative
    The comparny who are pulling this off, http://www.transmediacorp.com/. The link wasn't included in the summary nor the article.

    Personally, I think this looks very impressive, and it will be interesting to see how it pans out.

    --
    My 3D Texturing Skinning work (under construction)
    1. Re:TransMedia Corp by sh00z · · Score: 2, Funny

      Er, "The document contains no data." Doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

    2. Re:TransMedia Corp by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      As determined earlier, it would appear that they run their servers off of Windows. That may be why their site is experiencing so many problems right now.

      But you're right, it does leave a very bad impression. I'm sure there are many users here now who will forever associate this company and product with a completely dead server.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:TransMedia Corp by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Ill wait for them to go bust and get the open source clone / replacement.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    4. Re:TransMedia Corp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, that's like, the worst name ever. It just smacks of ScamWare. Not even far off from HyperCompuGlobalMegaMart...

    5. Re:TransMedia Corp by Texas_Refugee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Are you kidding? This is the worst vaporware announcement I have ever seen. They can't even keep their webservers up. If some no-name startup can come out of nowhere and build what is described as 10 times more complete and complicated than anything I have ever seen before, I tend to think it is complete bullshit.

      If things like this exist, they dont magically ship completely formed. You hear about them for a while and then they slowly add features and scale up. From what I can tell from the google cache, there is not a single reputable technology person in the company, only a nobody CEO.

      According to his bio, he was previously a director at "RxRemedy" which apparently no longer exists. In fact that company was under investigation by the SEC according to a simple google search. Here is a link to the SEC investigation into the company that my google search for RxRemedy turned up: http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp17650 .htm (in the document, search for RxRemedy) So let's see, his only listed previous company was investigated for investor fraud.

      What a freaking joke. This man probably belongs in prison.

      I am amazed that slashdot would put vaporware garbage like this on their front page.

    6. Re:TransMedia Corp by zoips · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe, you know, it was /.'d. But of course that never happens to a server running on a *nix platform and Apache httpd, because those magically overcome any lack of bandwidth or lack of processing power from an unexpected surge in load. Seriously, just Shut. The. Fuck. Up.

    7. Re:TransMedia Corp by oscartheduck · · Score: 0
      I am amazed that slashdot would put vaporware garbage like this on their front page.


      You haven't been here long, have you?
      --
      How to use coral cache: http://slashdot.org.nyud.net:8090/~oscartheduck
    8. Re:TransMedia Corp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't been here long, have you?

      Just check your and his/her uid...

    9. Re:TransMedia Corp by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      You're the only one suggesting the idea that *nix servers are immune to problems.

      But then again, let's consider what this company is doing. They're offering a web-based service. One would think that they're capable of setting up a server, regardless of the operating system, that can handle a fairly significant load. And in all fairness, a Slashdotting is not a large load in the whole scheme of things. They're lucky they didn't make the front page of the BBC or New York Times sites!

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    10. Re:TransMedia Corp by bataras · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm not

  6. Zzzz by rootedgimp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is this the sort of thing anyone in the /. community would use? I don't mean to troll, but aren't there already a million and a half applications that people are already familiar with / already have installed that could do the exact same thing(s)? This isn't the days of Hotline anymore. (Though it did pwn for its time... Ahh, the power of dc++)

  7. Submitter and article forgot something... by Jugalator · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Link: Glide Effortless

    Seems like they're planning one gargantuan Flash site to run it all, judging by their current introductory site and the "flashy" screenshots of their upcoming one.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:Submitter and article forgot something... by Mishra100 · · Score: 1

      I hate mods who mark your post Redundant before they look at the timestamps. You posted this 2 minutes after the first post of this link. Thus you derserve no mods because you were too late on your post. ;) But you don't deserve a minus. Oh well, thanks for the link.

    2. Re:Submitter and article forgot something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I honestly was simply too late on hitting the reply button there :-p
      Oh well, my post was the third in line about it so it's understandable if they got tired of it ;)

  8. Bullshit by Jarnis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof'

    Will run on any browser, phone, mobile device, set top box.. and will do everything office, itunes, windows etc does... and magically solves music piracy on the sidelines by magically knowing what's legal and what's not.

    Same old story... Noname company comes out of nowhere, claims their product will cure cancer, end hunger and guarantee world peace all in one go. I call 'bullshit', until presented with real proof of the claims laid out.

    1. Re:Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might prove a viable competitor to iTunes, if it works as advertised and if it can scale to handle millions of users.

      Oh, is that all it takes to succeed? How about "...and doesn't suck". That's always a big plus.

    2. Re:Bullshit by David+Nabbit · · Score: 1
      Will run on any browser, phone, mobile device, set top box.. and will do everything office, itunes, windows etc does... and magically solves music piracy on the sidelines by magically knowing what's legal and what's not.
      ...The software package also runs background processes to end world hunger and add millions to your bank account.
      --
      "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
    3. Re:Bullshit by Rayaru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It won't compete with iTunes no matter how well it's designed, simply because it won't be able to manage the iPod.

    4. Re:Bullshit by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Funny
      You can do anything at zombo.com, anything at all!

      Welcome!

  9. Re:They run their servers on Windows? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    OK, so I assume their fate is sealed now in this discussion? ;-)

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  10. Most likely not. by CyricZ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know you're kidding, but the fact of the matter is that they probably won't. They'll probably just scan for filenames containing a name of a famous artist or band. A threatening letter will be sent automatically, even in cases of non-infringement.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:Most likely not. by AstroDrabb · · Score: 1
      A threatening letter will be sent automatically...
      Why would they even have to do that? According to TFA, everything will be on _their_ servers. All they would have to do is have their "Brittany-BackStreatBoy-ETC" scanner delete any file they though was "infringing" and send the user who uploaded it an email saying "sorry, Charlie, we deleted your upload". Problem solved.

      The PHB's of this corp will probably convince the media companies that no copyright material is ever traded since it always stays on the companies servers. However, more technical users will know that if it is playing on their computer, then the bits are going through their computer and probably could be captured and recorded.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    2. Re:Most likely not. by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Why would they just delete the file?

      They could always strike a deal with the recording industry. They quietly report any violations, and the recording industry lawyers take the infringers to court. Perhaps there will be some financial benefits for the alert.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    3. Re:Most likely not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kudos to the IE-crashing link.

      People-forced-to-use-IE-at-work-hater.

    4. Re:Most likely not. by oblivionboy · · Score: 1

      Actually my understanding is that just before the original Napster went down, they had a system in place which actually COULD identify a song against a database of "copyrighted songs". If I remember correctly it was able to look at the first 30 seconds or a minute, and create an analysis that resulted in a signature. This made it relatively easy to compare...

    5. Re:Most likely not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Get a real webbrowser, lol.

      Ain't their fault your work sucks and uses micros~1. Remember that next time you whine about how everyone hates windows.

    6. Re:Most likely not. by frogstar42 · · Score: 1

      that doesn't exactly sound like a sound scheme for promoting customer satisfaction. but what the hell do i know? i don't even have an MBA. ;)

    7. Re:Most likely not. by spiryguy · · Score: 1

      from the website: "TransMedia also plans to integrate Mediaguide's digital fingerprinting technology to work with its digital asset management, communication, secure sharing and distribution platform." third party ?

    8. Re:Most likely not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish they'd opensource THAT technology. It would really help tag my "legal" music collection.

  11. Jack of all trades... by stonedonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From TFA:

    The software, disclosed in mid-October, is called Glide Effortless. It's a set of 12 applications for content creation, communication, E-commerce, and sharing. The apps are Glide Photos, Glide Music, Glide Video, Glide Docs, Glide AllMedia, Glide Contacts, Glide Calendar, Glide Timeline (Glide's search engine), Glide Mail, Glide Cast (audio, text, and video conferencing), Glide Share, and Glide Shops.

    Sounds like a "jack of all trades, master of none" situation here. Purely speculative, of course, but these individual apps would take quite a long while to polish to the level of their competitors, requiring a huge staff that a start-up just wouldn't have. It would be nice to have an all-in-one, platform-agnostic, Web-accessible solution, but it reminds me too much of those multi-function printers and mobile devices where the sum is less than its parts.

    There's also the Google Mail syndrome, where people don't get on board en masse because they already have a Yahoo/MSN/whatever email address. Not only does the Glide suite have to be compelling, it has to make the user say "I need the whole thing" in the face of him or her already possessing individual programs they're already familiar with and are paying for. If I were TransMedia, I would have released demo versions of their individual apps, rather than cramming everything into one high-profile release. I think that's just asking for trouble.

    1. Re:Jack of all trades... by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      There's a lack of people getting a google mail address?

      I got one because I already had a Yahoo and MSN address. Hotmail deleted my name because I didn't sign in a whopping 30 days and the Yahoo one is swamped by mailing lists/spam - now I know better to prevent that - by keeping on signing services to my Yahoo address:)

      Many others I know got a gmail address just because.

  12. Astroglide Effortless by MisterLawyer · · Score: 4, Funny
    They ought to throw in a few science and astronomy applications (or maybe just some porn), and rename it to " Astroglide Effortless".

    The subliminal association would undoubtedly boost sales.

    1. Re:Astroglide Effortless by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Subliminal?
      I do not think that word means what you think it means.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    2. Re:Astroglide Effortless by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does

      Subliminal:
      "below the threshold of conscious perception"
      Reference: wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

      The association would be on an unconcious level.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    3. Re:Astroglide Effortless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I highly doubt that. Is there anyone who saw "Astroglide Effortless" and didn't recognize consciously what Astroglide is?

    4. Re:Astroglide Effortless by Alsee · · Score: 1

      "below the threshold of conscious perception"
      The association would be on an unconcious level.


      Ah yes, like being smacked in the face with a 30 pound halibut. Very subliminal, grin.

      Now does my quip make sense? The original post was humor, and I was just making further play on the interesting use of "subliminal" within it.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  13. Oxymoron? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Glide Effortless"

    Unfortunately, I hear the theme is quite different in federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison...

  14. Odds are by patonw · · Score: 0

    pretty high that it'll be a buggy bloated kludge.

  15. BWAAAAAA! by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
    Think of it as iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iCal, Mail, document sharing, shopping, and a few other apps all in one seamless application hosted as a service on the Web that could be accessed by any browser on any computer.
    And it makes your bowel movements smell like fresh cinnamon buns! It does everthing! - Transmedia Marketing Dept.
    --
    "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
    1. Re:BWAAAAAA! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I might have believed them if they hadn't said iMovie. The first step when using iMovie is usually to dump around 10GB of DV footage into the app. On my home Internet connection, that would take around five days to upload - hardly something I would expect the average home user to want to do.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:BWAAAAAA! by hotspotbloc · · Score: 1
      I didn't think of the issue of the raw dv size but yes, another reason to be sceptical of their claims.

      My issue is the idea someone could come out of nowhere and make a net based application suite anywhere as good as iMovie, iMail, etc. Take iMovie, IMO an incredible program that could almost justify buying a Mac Mini just for that alone. IMO these guys hit me as all sizzle and no steak.

      Now if Google said they had something like this I might believe them but not these guys.

      --
      "I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence or insanity but they've always worked for me" - HST
  16. Reminds me of... by penguin_asylum · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sounds just like what google is supposed to be trying to do... Free web-based versions of applications, including the supposed office suite, and the mail... But they've beaten google to parts of it; the question is whether this will discourage google from continuing, and if they will be as successful as google has been with this type of venture.

    1. Re:Reminds me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! Build a versatile, powerful office suite that anyone can download free of charge, and people will flock to it!

      Ooo.(org) wait a minute...

  17. Ads for Nerds? by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Promises are cheap. Slashvertising must be cheap too.

    Do these people have any track record? It's a startup? So I guess not.

    Why is this making news before it comes out?

    All I'm reading here are big promises on a product that a cross between .Mac/Google's offerings so- anything new to see here?

    Oh wait....

    From TFA:
    "Not only is TransMedia selling Glide to end users, it's also licensing the software to media companies [b]so they can sell it as a branded service.[/b ] As a result, companies like Comcast, Disney, SBC, and Verizon will have the opportunity to offer an integrated, monetizable service that, at first glance, look significantly more compelling than the offerings from Internet portals like AOL and Internet software services like MySpace.com."

    Gee, what I wanted, along with those Disney and eBay branded credit cards I don't have nor want.... just the corporations I trust with my personal info.

    1. Re:Ads for Nerds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Slashvertising must be cheap too.

      Indeed. If you follow the link to the homepage of the submitter of this story, you'll see that it leads to Thomas Clayburn's weblog. Follow the link to the submitted article, and you'll see that it's written by Thomas Clayburn. Of course, it's not immediately obvious, because, when submitting this article, Thomas Clayburn hid behind the alias "Dotnaught".

      I'm also a bit wary that Transmedia's website, the company behind this product, uses almost identical styles to both of Thomas Clayburn's websites. Just look at those grey microfonts for example, and it goes right down to similar coding styles. However, apart from superficial similarities, I didn't turn up anything definitive.

  18. Competitor to iTunes? by ForumTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Simply because you have all these features does not necessarily mean that you're going to be a successful competitor against products like iTunes. iTunes has been marketed so well that it has become almost synonymous with online music shopping. Without support of the major labels and strong advertising companies you simply will not be successful against a product like iTunes in the mainstream market. Furthermore, many people use iTunes as a simple player and therefore when they do feel the need to shop online for music it's just so easy for them to do so through the iTunes interface.

    Also, it seems that they're striving to have a lot of features however many sites that do this do indeed come out with many features however they don't perform any of those features exceptionally well. I guess we'll have to wait and see, but a startup company boasting this many features doesn't exactly give me a lot of confidence in the quality of all these services. This service, from what I can see, is also only available in a subscription based service model which quite frankly the majority of this market is not interested in. Their free plan also only comes with 50MB of space which is not going to persuade people to yet again switch service providers.

    Most of the features they're boasting are also fairly standard and people are not going to switch to a new service unless it offers significant benefits. For example, why would I switch to use this email service when they only give me 50MB of space and other free services give me 50 times that amount? Switching these services is also a pain in the ass for myself and everyone who communicates with me.

    --
    "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
    1. Re:Competitor to iTunes? by voisine · · Score: 1

      "Switching these services is also a pain in the ass for myself and everyone who communicates with me."

      Some of us don't have any friends, you insensitive clod!

  19. Glide??? by Lurk3r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Glide??? Wait, I thought 3dfx went out of buisness.....

    1. Re:Glide??? by Astronomypete · · Score: 0

      No they're now known as NVIDIA, after a small $112,000,000 fee.

      --
      Better is the enemy of good enough. - Russian proverb.
    2. Re:Glide??? by Lurk3r · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh that makes sense, wait, what?

  20. Video editing over the Internet? by andrewski · · Score: 0

    Does anyone else see the inherent problems with offering an iMovie competitor that runs over the internet? I really can't see the point in this, and I doubt they've the bandwidth or CPU farm to handle such an endeavor.

    I wonder if their service includes a free vial of snake oil too?

    1. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by Slashdiddly · · Score: 1

      Not commenting on this product specifically, but I think internet-based iMovie competitor might be possible (and even desirable) in some situations. High resolution video processing is very resource-intensive, which makes it a good match for a high powered backend server (possibly a farm). The user interface is just a couple of lowres preview quality windows - easily possible over a decent broadband connection.

      It is somewhat similar to google maps, where huge dataset lives on the server, but only a small portion of it is downloaded to the client on demand. In fact, it would be infeasible to run this type of application on most clients.

    2. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by atarione · · Score: 1

      yeah cause your ISP will LOOOOOVE the bandwidth usage on that?

      considering how large video files are I can't really see that this would work out so well w/o a new and much larger capacity infastructure.

      I would certainly not enjoy waiting for my video to upload at my cable internets 256k upstream bandwidth.

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    3. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by Slashdiddly · · Score: 1

      considering how large video files are

      You missed my point. You only need to transfer a tiny fraction of data in order to be able to edit video. You can splice and dice a multi-gigabyte movie by transferring little more that a few lowres keyframes.

    4. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by pomo+monster · · Score: 1

      Thin clients are barely usable for word processing and email, let alone cutting the kinds of movies you're suggesting would benefit from remote processing. You might--might--want to offload your final cut to a remote processor farm, but interactive editing would suck a hundred times the ass.

      Splice your movie together locally and you can still benefit from low-res quick previews rendered on your own machine.

    5. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by andrewski · · Score: 0

      It would be feasible with enough CPU and upstream bandwidth, but does this company have the resources?

      Additionally, for the video to have any sort of quality, you'd have to transfer your DV over the internet to them, edit it online, and then download the finished product. Even in the first world, where high bandwidth connections are readily available, this would be a stretch. Here in the good old second world of the USA, where upstream caps of 30 KB/sec are common, it's a pipe dream. Unless one convinces the cable internet providers to remove the upload caps or uses snail mail. And I think that the ISPs won't remove those caps, as most tend to suck the cock of the MPAA / RIAA so ferociously that they can't really concentrate on anything else.

    6. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by lachlan76 · · Score: 1

      yeah cause your ISP will LOOOOOVE the bandwidth usage on that?

      If they're willing to charge through the ass, then yes, I imagine they would.

    7. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iamtoo lazy to login to my acct. you aare correct. plus, even HD video editing canbe done realtime ona $400 dell, using proxy media and an EDL.. which most major apps support now. now, if we were talking 3dfx renders. that's diff..

    8. Re:Video editing over the Internet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You need to transfer the source data to the host. And at least for the kind of editing I'm familiar with, that data comes from local DV tapes.


      Eivind.

  21. Konqueror by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the KDE browser with a couple new ioslaves to me.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  22. Re:Installation issues on Windows systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I applaud your work, I have to respectfully take exception to some of your comments.

    One potentially profound shortcoming of your heuristic is that it is not able to create encrypted information; please address this in future work. Your model for emulating 8 bit architectures is urgently excellent. In fact, the main contribution of your work is that you concentrated your efforts on showing that checksums and the Internet can collude to overcome this issue. You proved that usability in Pop is not an obstacle.

  23. I'm going to add an astromomy program to it by give+me+an+idea · · Score: 1

    and I'm going to call it: Astroglide

  24. Glide *Effortless*!? by Laebshade · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a 'personal lubrication' brand...

  25. Glide Effortless??? by ForumTroll · · Score: 1

    It's effortless because nobody will put in the effort to use it.

    --
    "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
  26. Re:They run their servers on Windows? by Harker · · Score: 1

    I guess that would explain why the site is down... :P

    H.

    --
    When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
  27. They forgot to use their own product.... by TypoNAM · · Score: 3, Funny

    They forgot to use their own product to upload some data because I only get
    "This web document contains no data" out their server. ;)

    --
    This space is not for rent.
  28. PRWeb has moved by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Its new address is www.slashdot.org.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  29. Vaporware of the Year Award by alucinor · · Score: 3, Funny

    They almost missed it ... November's here already, less than two months left to enter!

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
  30. ASCAP & Transmedia by desNotes · · Score: 1, Informative

    September 21, 2004
    ASCAP ANNOUNCES STRATEGIC TECH RELATIONSHIP WITH TRANSMEDIA

    The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP) announced today that it has entered into an agreement with TransMedia for the use of TransMedia's Colaborata 2.5 digital media management and collaboration platform. Colaborata 2.5 provides an integrated, online media environment to securely manage and preview music, videos, pictures, documents and related information.

    "Technological innovation and member service are top priorities for ASCAP," said Chris Amenita, Senior Vice President, ASCAP Enterprises Group. "We're looking forward to working with TransMedia and using their Colaborata 2.5 platform to help simplify our internal digital media management and collaboration needs, and provide state-of-the-art service to our members."

    "We are very excited about the opportunity to work with the world's leading performing rights organization," said Donald Leka, Chairman and CEO of TransMedia. "The Colaborata 2.5 platform will provide ASCAP with an integrated and compatible solution that will allow them to cost-effectively manage and share digital media on a secure basis."

    TransMedia will be elaborating on this, and making additional announcements of significance to the music industry, at a media launch event on September 22 in Los Angeles, CA. For further details, contact David Berzin at 212-675-6664.

    About ASCAP:
    2004 marks the 90th anniversary of the founding of ASCAP. As the world's largest Performing Rights Organization, ASCAP has over 190,000 composer, lyricist and music publisher members representing all genres of music. ASCAP is committed to protecting the rights of its members by licensing and collecting royalties for the public performance of their copyrighted works, and then distributing these fees to the Society's members based on performances. ASCAP's Board of Directors is made up solely of writers and publishers, elected by the membership every two years. For more information about ASCAP, visit www.ascap.com.

    About TransMedia Colaborata:
    The TransMedia Colaborata platform is designed to reduce Digital Friction(TM), which is caused by the rapid proliferation of digital media (music, video, images) information (documents, calendars, contacts etc.) and of non-integrated, non-compatible hardware and software systems used to manage them. TransMedia's Colaborata 2.5 platform combats Digital Friction(TM) by providing secure browser-based access to media content and information through a single integrated and compatible platform. Colaborata enables users to manage media files, communicate while browsing and sharing media, and access information through a fully interactive media portal. For more information about TransMedia, visit www.transmediacorp.com.

    --
    "Saying that Linux is inferior to Windows because more people use Windows is like saying that all restaurants are inferi
  31. Website is Slashdotted! by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

    How in the hell are they going to provide feature-filled web-based applications to end users and other businesses if their web server can't even stand up to a Slashdotting? I may have to echo the "BS" claims already in place.

  32. Online services in general. by catwh0re · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just putting your everyday apps online doesn't make it a killer service. I'd always prefer to run it locally, particularly with broadband speeds not being favourable to say editing HD footage.

    Some things work well being able to be accessed online (Mail and schedules are the best examples I can think of.)

    I feel that alot of the service components are going to go to waste with underuse.

    The era of the laptop doesn't combine well with the all-online paradigm. The most successful approach I have seen with online tools, are ones that download to your device, and sync/update when you get back to an internet connection. Simpler models of this are music download services, and video download services (rather than video streaming services.) Basically so you can carry your content with you, and back it up quickly to devices. Consumers want freedom over their data.

    1. Re:Online services in general. by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Just putting your everyday apps online doesn't make it a killer service. I'd always prefer to run it locally, particularly with broadband speeds not being favourable to say editing HD footage.

      If editing HD footage is your everyday app, then yes. Not that many years ago, you would have said "particularly with dial-up speeds not being favourable to say running a GUI". For example, right now I'm writing a comment in my browser, and the speed is just fine. I don't think that is the biggest issue for me, for me it would be the security, anonymity and lock-in. It could be done well, but I'm not holding my breath...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Online services in general. by catwh0re · · Score: 1
      I definitely agree with you on the pace of which broadband speeds have increased as well as the ability to be always online.

      I agree that we will concede more applications to the web, but I think these services are designed more so that any big company can go from having a small web precense to one where they can offer all kinds of online services. E.g. for the Disney example, licensees could stitch together their own localised disney commercial, and have it burnt to disc and sent to them. Or use search to go through the hundreds of style guides and have collections put together for them based on search criteria. I think the services will be great in that regard. As these would be real world applications to each of the tools, rather than just having the iLife suite online.

  33. please stop making browser based apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Ok, they're easier to maintain on several clients, but seriously now...

    they fucking suck. Admit it, you only deliver to that platform because you're too fucking lazy or stupid to code cross-platform.

  34. Re:They run their servers on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    For god's sake, would you just shut the hell up with your pointless, offtopic anti-Microsoft rhetoric? Every god damn time you post I feel I've just become that much more stupid.

  35. Is that... by Darius+Jedburgh · · Score: 1

    Is that "Glide Effortless" as in "Think Different"?

  36. Seamless application? by Jedeye · · Score: 1

    "Think of it as iTunes, iPhoto, iMovie, iCal, Mail, document sharing, shopping, and a few other apps all in one seamless application" One of the things I like about all of the iLife programs is how easy they are to use, and simple design BUT if I was to try to wrap them up into one package well I dont think it would be as simple. and when most free e-mail providers have more space than this all in one web application. I will have to see it to believe it, but im not putting much hope in it.

    --
    do or do not there is no try - yoda
  37. Re:They run their servers on Windows? by ZenShadow · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, the domain contact's email address is at transmx.com. The web server at www.transmx.com redirects to... ...www.transmx.com.

    I am uninspired by the technical prowess of TransMedia's IT department.

    --S

    --
    -- sigs cause cancer.
  38. You mean, like Yahoo? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    1) Yahoo has been doing all this for a couple of years. Photos, music, calendars, shops, auctions, mail, search... maybe not video. So what's the big difference? Oh, Yahoo isn't seamless. Right.

    2) Gimme a break. None of this can possibly compete with a desktop-based application at dialup speeds, DSL, or cable. Although I know many people, including my wife, who use Yahoo Mail as their only email application, it is still clunky and awkward compared to a locally hosted mail service. Of course it has compensating advantages, not the least being freedom from email address changes every time one's ISP is acquired by a larger company, accessibility from every computer, etc. But as an application, it sucks.

    Sure, everyone will have direct fiber to their home Real Soon Now. And when that happens, it will change a lot of things. But that won't make Glide anything special. Basically what Glide is saying that their applications will be really cool to use after someone else (phone companies, etc.) actually does all the hard work.

  39. So...it's a portal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the most unbearable bit of crap PR I have seen in a long, long, time. The only thing missing was "Ajax".

    This whole thing is just another portal, but they've gone to foolishly great lengths to pretend that it isn't. "The Glide suite, due later this month, runs on the vendor's own servers and is accessed through a browser.", but it's not a portal! "Glide is browser-based and thus can be used on the three major PC operating systems -- Linux, Mac, and Windows", but it's not a portal! "Initially, the products available through Glide's E-commerce system will include music, ring tones, chocolate, photo prints, and personalized products.", but it's not a portal!

    Six weeks after launch, Google, Yahoo! and MSN will all do exactly the same thing that "Glide Effortless" is supposed to do, and better.

  40. and 6 months later... by rscoggin · · Score: 1

    and 6 months later...google will release a free version :D

  41. Motivation by everphilski · · Score: 1

    Your missing the point. The point is what is the motivation for someone to hack into your computer and get personal information? What profit is there in personal communcations? Even investment information is a moot point (so what if they know what stocks/mutual funds you own? Now if you have your accounts and brokers stored on your computer, you are an idiot). The information doesn't need to be freely available because it isn't worth digging for.

    -everphilski-

    1. Re:Motivation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The point is what is the motivation for someone to hack into your computer and get personal information? What profit is there in personal communcations?

      Blackmail, identity theft, revenge, stalking, burglary, kidnapping. Namely, the more valuable you are, the greater the value of information about you. Doubly so if you have enemies and/or very angry and very knowledgable ex-girlfriends.

      If somebody hates you and has access to any private information about you, the chance of that information being used to hurt you is non-zero.

    2. Re:Motivation by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      No, you missed the point. And that is that no hacking of an individual's computer needs to be done when using a centralized service such as this. Only one server needs to be compromised for the data of potentially millions upon millions of individuals to be stolen.

      And there's nothing wrong with storing sensitive data on a computer. You just have to do it sensibly. Often times that means making sure that physical access to the machine is limited. Running a secure operating system such as OpenBSD also helps. And one thing you do not do is use a service that removes your control over such things.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  42. Slick... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 1

    "companies like Comcast, Disney, SBC, and Verizon will have the opportunity to"

    See, this creates the impression that they've already got contracts with Comcast, Disney, SBC, and Verizon.

    But they don't. They're just saying companies *like* those, who decide to buy in but have not yet done so will be able to do the promised things...

    It's like if I write a web page saying "through placing my personal ad on Craigslist, women like Elle Macpherson, Angelina Jolie, the Spice Girls, Christina Aguilera, Audrey Tautou, and Jennifer Love-Hewitt will have the opportunity to meet me for casual sex, possibly all at once. So the rest of you ladies can see I'm a hot property! Better act fast!."

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  43. Pay for it??? by tooyoung · · Score: 1

    It almost sounded interesting until I saw that they actually expected people to pay for it. Not only is it not free, but $99.95 a year?

  44. Worst...article...ever by TuballoyThunder · · Score: 1
    I just love it when a PR written piece of festering crap gets posted as an article on /.
    On Nov. 15, a New York-based startup called TransMedia plans to release an integrated suite of consumer media applications that has the potential to radically alter the balance of power among Internet and software service providers.

    ...snip...

    As a result, companies like Comcast, Disney, SBC, and Verizon will have the opportunity to offer an integrated, monetizable service that, at first glance, look significantly more compelling than the offerings from Internet portals like AOL and Internet software services like MySpace.com.

    Is that PR speak or what.
  45. BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Search for glide effortless on google. The first two results are their website. No data. the next one has the same title as the second. Then come three news articles with the same text in all of them. One of them is even cut and pasted wrong.

  46. Re:They run their servers on Windows? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "They might run their servers on Windows, if their main website is any indication."

    Scientific deduction or sensationalistic karma whoring? You be the judge.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  47. Sorry, web apps is not going to do the trick. by Rolf+Tollerud · · Score: 0

    Contrary to common believes the future is not "Purely Web application", but a "combination of desktop and web applications".

    Take streaming for example. If Glide were to allow unlimited streaming then a couple of hundred slashdotters could easily clog down a whole network, even if it was of Google dimensions.

    Compare that to a service as ORB Networks, that works as a combination of desktop power and web. All that you publish stay on your computer but is published on web. All streaming goes direct from your computer. Also it is up to the user what to publish and not publish. Copyright laws are the user's responsibility as it should be.

    Look no further than Microsoft two new Internet-based software services -- Windows Live and Microsoft Office Live to see how incredible more powerful "combination of desktop and web" is that only desktop applications or only web applications.

    So sorry, web apps is not going to do the trick (taking on Microsoft)

  48. chocolate?? by se7en11 · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the article: "Initially, the products available through Glide's E-commerce system will include music, ring tones, chocolate, photo prints, and personalized products. Options are likely to expand as developers avail themselves of the Glide software developer's kit and partners build on the Glide platform.

    I'm in!! Anyone promissing ring tones AND chocolate is a sure winner.

  49. Turn back the clock? by panxerox · · Score: 1

    This is what the internet would be if the corps. could turn back the clock and if they created the "internet". One seemless money making mechanism. No blogs, No free speech, No talking back to the corporations, No bad little net users giving them the finger just lots and lots of consumers assuming the position and saying thank you sir !

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  50. Caveman IT Guy Lawyer by Douglas+Simmons · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just a caveman. I fell on some ice and later got thawed out by some of your scientists. Your world of p2p programs that allow file sharing without the risk of illegal copying frightens and confuses me! Sometimes the honking horns of your traffic make me want to get out of my BMW.. and run off into the hills, or wherever.. Sometimes when I get a message on my fax machine, I wonder: "Did little demons get inside and type it?" I don't know! My primitive mind can't grasp these concepts. But there is one thing I do know - when a man like my client tries to download an innocent Beyonce video and it turns out to be copyrighted bukkake, then he is entitled to no less than two million in compensatory damages, and two million in punitive damages. Thank you.

  51. PGP / GPG anyone? by SpectralDesign · · Score: 1

    Even if you're too cheap to buy PGP (like me, for example) you can still run it on MSWindows under Cygwin. If you have a 2k or 4k encryption key it's not likely that anyone will be able to hack your private files :)

    (and if you're a tinfoil hat-wearer, then you know the government already knows all about your private files anyway.)

    --
    Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
  52. They might be doing that by AAWood · · Score: 1

    You know, it's actually possible that they do? There's a service called Shazam where you can call them up, hold the phone up to some music that's playing, and then they'll text you back the title of the song. It's always worked for me, even when I was beign played the song by a send who over Google Talk. If the tech exists to identify a song from a 20 second clip at phone quality from a low-quality source, I dread to think how quickly and accurately they could do it with direct access to whatever mp3/ogg/wma/wav you were trying to share.

  53. What is this digg.com by Matarick · · Score: 1

    It looks like Digg is getting /.ed already.

    No slashdot killer can be on the receiving end of the /. effect.

  54. LY! by mattr · · Score: 1

    Glide EffortlessLY!!!
    Please! They need to buy an adverb first, then start shopping for clues.

  55. why the urge for net computing? by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Is it really that hard to download an app, ie iTunes and do cool stuff.

    Doing EVERYTHING via the web is a waste, if you really want it that badly, make the Xprotocol standard
    part of mozilla, then we can run X apps.

    Are people that lazy they cant download an app in 12seconds? or do corporates prevent app installations?
    Or is the real ticket here, controlling the user, via one app, no 200 versions to maintain ??

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  56. Wait a second... by macthulhu · · Score: 1
    Initially, the products available through Glide's E-commerce system will include music, ring tones, chocolate, photo prints, and personalized products.
    Chocolate? How does chocolate fit in with any of the other services they're talking about?
    --

    Someday a real rain is gonna come...

  57. Integration... finally? by spiryguy · · Score: 1

    This is exciting. It appears from what I've read so far that these guys may have done something that Yahoo, Google, et al have refused to do so far because they are too big and slow (read: corporate) to actually pull it off. It seems like a pretty useful solution for the typical consumer who doesn't have the know-how or time to install and learn multiple applications. The ability to share unlimited media previews alone eclipses any mail program that exists today, no? And video conferencing with built-in file sharing, previews and whiteboarding could prove useful enough to pay for.

  58. Amazon Turk Filesharing by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    I can just imagine it: "Please download this song, and tell us if it should be distributed to people who aren't paying customers."

  59. It will fail by HogynCymraeg · · Score: 1

    There are laws right now to do with accessibility. Flash fails on this front.A visually impaired person will find this a very difficult application to work with.

  60. From Cyric's FA by bensafrickingenius · · Score: 1

    Penn State "remains committed to working closely with the RIAA and other law enforcement entities"

    I suppose it was inevitable that soon even erudite institutions like Pennsylvania State University would start thinking of the RIAA as a "law enforcement entitity." How sad.

    --
    I am not left-handed, either!