Computer Jobs -- How to Resign Professionally?

MikeDawg asks: "I submitted a letter of resignation yesterday, and today I'm at home posting stories to my weblog and Slashdot. I gave my employer two weeks notice, and almost immediately, I had my accounts disabled, and my permissions revoked on all the computers at my work, which makes me unable to do anything in my position of being a 'Systems Analyst/Systems Administrator'. I spoke with the HR rep, and gave her my notice yesterday, then I spoke with her today about what had happened to my access, and they honored my resignation... 2 weeks early. (Luckily, I'm compensated in pay for the next two weeks). What I want to know is, how do you computer and IT professionals out there put in your notice of resignation (if you are with a permanent employer, and not contractual), and not get immediately shutdown, and shunned away from the computers? The CIO immediately thought I was going to do something terrible to the system, and destroy accounts, and any other activity that I have access to, but I was giving him notice that I was leaving. What is the professional thing to do?"

Comments

What did you expect?

[Sylvestre]

You're a liability. You got paid. Be happy.

Re:What did you expect?

[Anonymous Coward]

You got paid two weeks without responsibilty to do anything else - take the money and move on, that's being professional...

Re:What did you expect?

[Fishstick]

Really - this is SOP in many, if not most places. At my company, anyone with "sensitive" access is immediately revoked upon receipt of written resignation. Period.

I would be more surprised to hear anything else.

Re:What did you expect?

[tomhudson]

Show up every day, talk cheerfully to all the people who still have to give it their all, be obnoxiously upbeat.

They'll double your severance if you agree to leave the building PDQ. Just stay there while they cut you the check.

I've got one friend who did that and was paid to stay home for 2 months, we was so demoralizing to the "survivors".

Re:What did you expect?

[Funakoshi]

Ouch...kinda harsh.

As long as you've left on a good note (given proper notice - two weeks typically, no screaming matches with old managers, etc etc) then I wouldn't worry too too much.

Re:What did you expect?

[neostorm]

I think he expected to be treated like a trustworthy, normal human being. No one likes being treated like a criminal; people are not liabilities.

The real liabilities are our mistreatment of employees, and how the reaction to lack of respect and trust takes form from them. The majority of the time that an employee does something bad to his or her workplace, it's an act of revenge or bitterness because they wronged and feel disrespected. Contrary to popular belief people do not cause mayhem and mischeif to others for no reason.

What we really need to look at is the behavior of companies towards the people they employ, and the people they consider customers.

Re:What did you expect?

[Achromatic1978]

So someone asks for advice on professionalism and you give this?

99% of employers? They'll have security escort you from the building. The severance is in lieu of notice, as in 'your employment is /severed/ at that point', and you have zero right to be there, and are actually trespassing.

Re:What did you expect?

[Jackhamr]

I would try to give a 6 month written notice then.

Re:What did you expect?

[ajs]

I've never worked for anyone who thought like that. In fact, I'm pretty sure I WOULDN'T work for someone who seemed to think like that. It's just unprofessional. When I resign, I give 3-4 weeks notice, and I expect the company to make the most of my time. I usually have an equity stake in the company, and I want them to succeed just as much as they do. If your company is treating you this way it is for one of two reasons: 1) they don't trust you or 2) they feel compelled to behave in a detrimental manner because a manager with either too much or too little authority thinks it's their job.

Now FIRING SOMEONE... that's different. In that case, I compartmentalize them starting the day before, backing up anything that they can touch. I then shut off their machine after they leave, remove or lock accounts and remove their remote access if they had it.

This is all as much for their benefit as mine. If they had no means of access after they found out, no one can accuse them of anything.

I also ALWAYS offer to forward people's mail, though that's gotten harder in the last few years. Companies now feel that there's too much of a chance of mail being sent to their old account with proprietary information in it. Oh well.

Re:What did you expect?

[halowolf]

I am a contractor now, having shunned full time work myself. Why? because it is my experience that companies are in it for themselves regardless of the impact the have for their employees. The parent is right, take the money and move on.

I suppose its rather sad having such a low opinion of corporations, but I have seen them screw enough people to not be bothered by the mercenary attitude that I have now towards work. I contract so I get paid the hours that I work and to stop work intruding on the rest of my life.

Re:What did you expect?

[Oculus Habent]

As nice as it is to think that you could work out a notice, it is appropriate for companies to simply shake hands with you and pay you the two weeks you offered.

If the company has done its job, you don't need to be there. If you were to get hit by a bus, would the company survive? Probably? Then they'll get by without you. If they realize they need you desperately, you can consult.

Also, you are a liability. Even if you display no ill will toward the company, they can't be sure it's not an act.

To be professional, you accept the two weeks severance pay, and inform them you are available for consultation, should it be necessary. That's about all you can expect.

As far as the account lockout goes, I was put in a similar situation during a mass layoff when a company changed hands. They laid me off and asked me to train someone to do my job in basically the same breath. They had to clear it with my (by then former) boss, two sysadmins, and the CTO before I could have my accounts unlocked with someone watching over my shoulder. Had I been malicious, I could have done quite a bit of damage.

Re:What did you expect?

[thekla]

The real liabilities are our mistreatment of employees, and how the reaction to lack of respect and trust takes form from them. The majority of the time that an employee does something bad to his or her workplace, it's an act of revenge or bitterness because they wronged and feel disrespected. Contrary to popular belief people do not cause mayhem and mischeif to others for no reason.

Agreed. The plethora of posts about how this is SOP and something to be expected amazes me. I have left my job twice this far, in good terms, and both times I was expected to stay in there until the last day, help with the transition, tidying up all loose ends and demonstrating to clients that the handover was smooth and safe. In both cases, aside from throwing a mini party and having personal talks with most co-workers to thank each other for long-time cooperation, I also sent emails to clients ensuring them that the resignation is in good terms and explaining them all the steps taken to ensure that their projects will not be affected, sometime visiting them to introduce the co-worker that would replace me on my former duties.

Yes, I could have done a lot of horrible things from ruining relationships, to deleting files, or even stealing knowledge and sensitive information. But I could have done these things before resigning anyway. And I knew a lot of stuff without access to the computers in the first place. So, it's more a matter of being a respectable and civil person, who feels that their former employer honoured them and is not likely to become a criminal beast the day after resignation. If my employer believed that the only thing stopping me from screwing up their business was that I didn't have a job elsewhere, I very much doubt they'd be employing me in the first place. Then again, please note that I live in Europe, and I understand that corporate culture here is on the average somewhat different thatn in the US.

Re:What did you expect?

[JanneM]

A mature, thoughtful organization would realize a couple of things. First, he is sitting with a whole lot of implicit knowledge about the current assignments. Having him spend the last two weeks document it all and bringing other people up to speed on it is a pretty good idea.

Second, he is leaving. There is a reason for it. Is it the salary? Personal conflicts? The hours? Too little challenge, or too heavy a workload? Is there a problem with the social climate at the IT department? A good organization will want to know, and conduct exit interviews to see if there are points they should improve. Perhaps even catch a disaster in the making before it explodes in their faces.

Third, he is now an ex-employee. He will go out in the world and socialize with his peers at other companies - some of whom his previous employer may well want to hire at some point in the future. If his final impresion of the company is that of a bunch of posterior orifices, that's what he'll be telling people when they ask him about his opinion on applying for a position there. If, on the other hand, they do a good job of taking care of him up until the moment his contract ends, showing interest as above and so on, the impression will be vastly better, and they'll effectively be sending out a PR representative that will be giving a much better impression about the company for years to come.

So yes, there are very good reasons not to just cancel his passcard and give him thirty minutes to pack his personal belongings before having him escorted out by a rent-a-cop.

Re:What did you expect?

[nightcrawler77]

Then what's the point? If everyone at the company knows this is SOP, what does a company gain from immediately terminating someone upon recieving their resignation? It's not like they're terminating you at the moment you learned you were leaving.

Seems like a silly "security" measure to me.

Re:What did you expect?

[tomhudson]

After a certain period, severance pay is worth more than you'll get for your 2-week notice.

If you can get 2 months, why not? If they're treating you stupidly (locking you out of systems, etc., when you clearly could have done any nasty shit well in advance) rather than professionally, return the "favour". They have it coming.

The way they handled it might be SOP, but it doesn't mean its right or ethical. Nobody should be treated like a crook or a pariah. If they want to do that, let them PAY EXTRA for the privilege. Or should peoples dignity be made available at a deep discount Wally-word price, or in this case thrown in free because they have to pay the 2 weeks anyway?

If you're smart, you already have backups. You need them to protect yourself so nobody can make you take the blame for something that "happened" after you left. Same with your email. Same with personal effects. Remove everything the day before you hand in your resignation. You're an idiot if you don't.

Act professionally until they act stupid. Then let the games begin, because you're leaving anyways. And if they don't act stupid, they get 2 more weeks of loyal, professional, courteous service, and the possibility of calling you up if they ever need anything. If they don't - well, they get what they deserve, and know better than to even think of calling you later. You don't need the ag.

Re:What did you expect?

[mallie_mcg]

He was lucky.

I resigned almost two weeks ago and still have two weeks left before my four week notice period is up.

I will continue to do my job cabably until the very end and won't be doing anything malicious, it is our corporate culture that people (even those in powerful/trusted positions) work to the very end of their contract.

I'm surprised how well the boss took me writing "I resign" on the whiteboard though.

Re:What did you expect?

[HotNeedleOfInquiry]

I'll tell you the point.

No supervisor, no HR flack and no VP ever got fired for running off an employee that gave notice. OTOH, there's a fair possibility that they could be fired if the employee did something grievious after giving notice.

Re:What did you expect?

[Antarius]

Actually, I used a similar argument to that one when arguing how many weeks to pay out an ex-employee who had given notice (and was actively sabotaging.

They had given 6 weeks notice (expecting to be paid out on all 6); however, legally they only needed to give us 1 week.

The clerk-droid at the other end of the phone at the Industry reps said "Um, I suppose you have to pay them their 6 weeks."

Upon which I asked "What would happen if I gave 10 years notice?"


Guess what; they did some research and we only needed to pay the 1 week that they were legally required to give!


I agree with other posters; it is standard procedure to have people finish without working out their leave - depending on their reason for leaving.

Last week, we had an employee leave (before he was pushed) and he finished that afternoon. (We checked his briefcase on his way out and removed all of the confidential information he was stealing first... Warrants are being drawn up to search his house now.)

If that guy had stayed on, he would have caused a lot of damage.

OTOH, one of our techs has advised that he will be leaving within 12 months, and has expressed that he wants to work out the completion of his work - and he will be allowed to do so! Why? Because he's simply going to be moving back to his home town - nothing sinister there!


Finally, in some industries, the moment you announce that you are leaving, you are escorted off the premises immediately by security.

Personal effects on your desk? No problem. We'll post them to you. Don't let the door hit you in the arse on the way out!


And just in case anyone is wondering; This is in South Australia, not some First Would Country!

Re:What did you expect?

[Large Green Mallard]

Security is about managing risks. There's no way to make something perfectly secure, only to manage the risks it presents to your organisation.

Immediately ceasing access for staff who are leaving, as an example. Most people aren't going to do anything. If they've given you 2 weeks notice and you let them go straight away, you're spending the equivalent of 2 weeks wages to treat the risk they will. Depending on the company, many places are happy to accept that risk treatment cost.The risk is not just that they will trash their computer or your systems. They may also steal or misuse confidential data, like customer lists.

I know of one person in consulting, who planned to setup his own company, doing what he did for his current company, and had planned to send a goodbye email to all his corporate contacts saying he was now in practise for himself - at 75% the price. He however was similarly unaware, like the original poster, of his company's seperation practises, and was escorted from the building immediately after handing in his letter of resignation. Fortunately his old company never found out about this, so he got a good reference for when he went for a similar job at another company, unable to start his own firm.

I once saw a post on slashdot about how sad it was that the NSA would destroy entire machines that had never been out of their box, just because they had been designated as spares for their datacentre. Consider it another way.. the machines were 2 years old, purchased tax free in bulk, and depreciated down to a minimal value. The risk posed that they may have ever been used and had operational data meant that it made a lot of sense to destroy perfectly good hardware.

Anyway, the point is, risks aren't always as obvious as they seem, and risk treatment is an interesting beast. Sometimes you do things which look like waste in order to prevent threats.

(IANAL, but I am a risk management/it security consultant :P I'd recommend the same thing in the same situation)

Re:What did you expect?

[AndyKron]

I've personally never seen anyone being escorted to the door unless it was something they were being fired for. People have always been allowed to finished their two weeks. Hell, we usually need more than those two weeks to pick their brains dry of all their tribal knowledge! I'd hate to have a key person leave the company, leaving us to figure out their job without their input. Ex employees are also usually available for consultation after they leave, too. At least this has been my personal experience, and what I've seen for others that I've worked with.

-AC

Re:What did you expect?

[tverbeek]

Some organisations will lock you out as a matter of policy as soon as you "betray" your intentions, but I've had much better treatment the last couple of times I left a job. Presumably because they knew I was trustworthy.

One employer left my key accounts in place (disabled) and hired me to do some consulting ("temp work", really) using those (re-enabled) accounts afterward.

The last place I quit amazed me at just how trusting they were: On my last day on the job (after giving notice), my boss, his managerial peers, and their boss were all unavailable, so I had to find a "responsible individual" in the department (a non-manager with more seniority than me) to give my keys to that afternoon. At the end of the day, I was actually left alone in the data center with both login and physical access to critical systems (to say nothing of the office kitchen and storage room). They trusted me to shut down my computer, turn off the interior lights, and lock the door behind me on the way out. (Which - considering that I was quitting in part because I hated how the place was run - was rather naive.)

Re:What did you expect?

[elakazal]

You are a liability, but you were before, too. It's not like you woke up one morning and found note taped to your forehead notifying you that you have a new job starting in two weeks. If you were going to do something vile with your privileges, and you were remotely intelligent, you'd have already done it before you provided notice. This is shooting themselves in the foot.

Certainly the company can survive without you, but transitions for many positions can be long and costly, and its silly for an employer not to keep somebody around to help prepare for it.

They're certainly within their rights, of course, so take your money and enjoy your time off.

Re:What did you expect?

[084883447]

Yeah, flip them the bird...but that's really all you can do. But that stuff about respect is off base, because he was the one who gave notice. It says nothing about how he was treated while on the job. IT professionals have a lot of responsibility and a lot of power, and can seriously f-up a company with a few clicks. Any sane employer doesn't want that to happen.

The lesson is: give a month notice next time, and hope they will do the same thing. I'd rather have a month's severance than 2 weeks.

Re:What did you expect?

[Anonymous Coward]

Dear HR,

  Thank you for the lovely fruit basket in my signing bonus last week. I would like to take this opportunity to notify you that I will be resigning from the company on Dec 7, 2025.

Sincerely,
You Devoted Soon-To-Be-Former-Employee

p.s. Don't forget my pension when you draw up the severance papers.

Re:What did you expect?

[kogus]

How resignations are handled are really an indicator of the hiring process, not the termination process. If a company goes out of it's way to hire people who are trustworthy, and treats them with respect while they are employees, then it isn't necessary to lock users out. On the other hand, if the hiring process is slack or employees are treated poorly, then these procedures are an absolute necessity.

Re:What did you expect?

[IAmTheDave]

If a company treated me that way, it would be worth flipping them the bird... along with three customers and a couple of line cooks who happened to get in the way....

I couldn't disagree more. Speaking of professionalism, doing what the CIO did was probably just as professional as your resignation. There may be policies in place that dictate his actions, or more probably, your resignation ended your employ, and they took action to protect their assets.

As others have posted, you get paid for two weeks, so they show professionalism again by not trying to rob you of the pay for the two weeks notice you have given. However, expecting that you'll have carte blanche access to the systems during your two last weeks is a bit silly. Most people spend that time backing up code to personal computers or otherwise stealing IP belonging to the employer.

Re:What did you expect?

[Wavicle]

Your friend was lucky. He was working at a company that was brain dead.

The company should have just escorted him from the building and told him never to come back. Even if it was an office building and he was hanging out in the corridors, unless he has legitimate business there, the company is within its right to have him escorted out if he is disrupting productivity in any way.

Tip to the wise: don't try this at your work. They'll kick your ass out *and* give you a bad reference.

Re:What did you expect?

[shri]

Well, it is all about HOW you give your notice. People who are important to the company should talk to their managers or the senior most person they have access to and explain to them they are leaving and these are the outstanding projects on hand. Explain that you'd like to hand over to the next person and make sure there is some continuity.

You'd be surprised how well such a "pre-resignation" would be handled. It also will give you a good chance to figure out how really important you are to the company.

The problem is a lot of people think they are important... when they really are not.

Re:What did you expect?

[Anonymous Luddite]

I think parent post is bang on.

If the management has _any_ brains, they realize you would have/could have committed nefarious acts _before_ giving notice. The termination of system access is absolutely _not_ personal. It will be mandated by policy in many places and in fact protects the person who gave notice. If you gave notice and something "bad" happened immediately afterwards, server crash, corrupt database _whatever, suspicion would naturally fall on, you the terminated employee, unless you had no access to the systems.

As someone else has said, just take the pay and smile for 2 weeks. Where I work, you wouldn't have got past security the next day... again, nothing personal, just policy.

Re:What did you expect?

[flosofl]

I too am in risk management. I heartily agree with what you have said. It all boils down to each companies tolerance of risk. Some companies are willing to pay the 2 weeks of serverence even though the employee no longer performs the job.

I work for a multi-national bank, and they do this all the time. They may spend millions over the course of a couple of years doing this, but this is what they are willing to pay to mitigate the possibility of even higher loss. There are some systems (I'm thinking of Fed Reserve and clearing house operations) that could cost that much over the course of a couple *hours* if they were disrupted (fines and/or actual loss). Even though internal controls make it unlikely to happen, the risk is still there and paying for 2 weeks of non-productivity is a small price to pay to reduce it.

This does not even take into account the *legal* problems a company would face if they allowed an out-going employee access and he/she disrupted operations to the point of major financial loss. It's called Due Care. And it can result in criminal charges being brought against the senior management. "So you knew the possibility existed, but still let this person have access?"

Don't be insulted. This is just SOP these days for any company with responsibilities to shareholders.

Re:What did you expect?

[Twanfox]

Be that as it may, what about the situation where the employee knows they're leaving, but the employer knows they're not. SOP for technical employees then becomes "Resign a day or two ahead of when you want to quit. That way, you get to work up til the end, and get a 2 week bonus". It may be 'sensible' to manage risk like that, but it is severely rude to respond to someone's polite and respectable statement of intentions with (the equivilent of) 'Get out now.'

Re:What did you expect?

[alc6379]

It's against the law to give a bad reference in my state (TN). You can only answer "yes" or "no" to the question: "Is person eligible to work at your company ever again?

Re:What did you expect?

[Shakrai]

IT professionals have a lot of responsibility and a lot of power, and can seriously f-up a company with a few clicks.

You could make the same argument for senior management but somehow when they f-up the company they get a nice severance package from the board. I guess a few mil is a nice reward for running a company into the ground.

Hell, let's not even go there. Let's talk about grunt workers. In a lot of companies the janitors/maintenance are almost as powerful (if not more so?) as the IT staff. They have keys to everything, including (in all of the places I've ever worked) the server room. Sure, they can't screw the company over with a "few clicks", but an uber magnet and/or sledgehammer would probably have the same result.

I for one am tired of being treated like a criminal by paranoid employers. Like if he was going to screw them over he would have given two weeks notice and then screwed them over. And don't give me the "it's just business" argument. If it was just business he would have left without giving them any notice. Hell, if you are salaried just walk out the door at about noon. Odds are they'll have to pay you for the rest of the day. That's business.

Re:What did you expect?

[Anonymous Luddite]

Actually funny/not-funny

I worked at a company where one of the managers decided to move on. She was near the top, worked hard and was quite professional. Her mistake was in giving three months notice so they could work out a graceful exit.

She was fired on the spot, asked to leave the property and given the minimum statutory severance.

In my jurisdiction, once you've given notice you may be let go immediately provided the company pays severance. I knew I was leaving my job with that company for 6 months and didn't give notice till 2 weeks before. I would have loved to give them more time to plan for my replacement, but figured they'd just shaft me.

They went bankrupt a few years later. Sometimes you get what you deserve. :-]

Re:What did you expect?

[Infernal Device]

Now FIRING SOMEONE... that's different. In that case, I compartmentalize them starting the day before, backing up anything that they can touch. I then shut off their machine after they leave, remove or lock accounts and remove their remote access if they had it.

You left out: pouring bleach on their chair and torching the office so as to remove all traces of their odious stain upon the soul of your company, YOU SLACKER!

Re:What did you expect?

[Pig Hogger]

Oh... and to answer the question asked -- the best advice is to keep it short and to the point, no comments about why you're leaving or where you're going. "Dear Manager -- As of (date) I resign my position as (position) --Sincerly (yourname)"

When Charles de Gaulle resigned from the French Presidency, his resignation letter was:

"Je cesse d'exercer mes fonctions de président de la République. Cette décision prend effet aujourd'hui à midi".

("I cease to exert my functions of president of the Republic. This decision comes in effect today at noon").

Re:What did you expect?

[1u3hr]

during your two last weeks.... Most people spend that time backing up code to personal computers or otherwise stealing IP belonging to the employer.

Bad idea; they'll be watching you. "Backup" all your files well in advance of giving notice. I put in a lot of late nights cleaning up my desk, filing stuff away, sanitising my email, making copies of interesting documents, before I left my resignation on the desk and walked out the door. Even in a less-hostile workplace where you might work out your notice, don't do anything at all questionable after you've given notice.

Re:What did you expect?

[Large Green Mallard]

Many companies don't care about the feelings of their current employees, let alone their soon to be ex-employees. It's sad but true. Companies exist to make and retain money for their shareholders, at the expense of all else.

Re:What did you expect?

[1u3hr]

If you're insane you have backups of your email. If you take anything of the sort and there is a good chance you are in violation of multiple sections of company policy

Company policy isn't law. Would you refer to have selected correspondence presented as evidence against you in some dispute? Make email backups; actually paper prints are better, lawyers trust paper more than digital files. Don't announce it, just have them in reserve in case they try to bushwhack you. I presented some email in a wages dispute, the send timestamps showed I'd been at work (or at least doing work) when they claimed I had skipped out. (Yeah, sure they could have been faked easily, though they weren't.)

Re:What did you expect?

[forgetful_ca]

At one of the places I worked, I was terminated along with everyone else remotely involved with the same project. (Not relevant, getting to it) When I was let back in the building, they told us off site, the systems admin actually let me take home the second hard drive of my workstation, because I had a tonne of mp3's on it. Her boss wasn't consulted, he'd have undoubtedly said no. I'm sure her decision was a combination of being a cool person and survivor's guilt, but she still didn't have to say yes.

Re:What did you expect?

[Canberra Bob]

After reading all the comments, I guess I was lucky (or unlucky, depending on which way you look at it). My last job I gave about 2 months notice, and they had me working until the very last day (where I still had full access to the system even when totally blind drunk after my farewell party). Yes, it was a large corporation. And yes, I did receive a great reference from them. On a side note - exit interviews are great when drunk - I highly recommend it as an experience! I became far more honest than I would have been if sober *grin*

Re:What did you expect?

[WNight]

Good logic, but you miss the point. An employee is no more likely to hurt you after giving you their resignation than before. They likely knew much sooner, so they've had all the time they needed to do anything. You're making up a risk, claiming it *could* cost USD 3.2 ho-jillions per second, and that having the employee killed is obviously a smart move, fiscally speaking.

If that employee was George from Seinfeld, controlled the world markets, and had just had a fight with his boss it might even be true. But really that person is moving, or found a better job, or has some totally non-hateful reason for leaving and planned to use the two weeks to wrap up their work, whose worst crime will be extra networking time with co-workers. Or, if they are malicious, they've likely got an IQ over 7 and they'll have already done whatever they were going to do.

In the end, you create a lot of ill-will within the professions that staff your company. That cog you fired can be replace with a call to HR, but that cog's co-workers and friends now don't see you as a good workplace. There appears to be a flood of tech workers, but some companies just can't seem to find anyone good... The real risk is that an overstuffed security nazi with a fetish for bureaucracy is destroying the assets of good-will, loyalty, industry reputation, and chasing away the R&D core of the business, those who should have the most invested in the company's future.

I've always given notice on a Friday, conforming for no real reason to the M-F business week, and I've cleaned up a bit. Nobody has been weird and canned me immediately, so no harm either way. But, listening to people like you has made me realize that the best time to give notice is monday at 11am, right after the weekend testers report and the project steering meetings, when I've got what feels like half of the shared files in the project open and checked out, and sixteen things and waiting on my simple yes-no. I figure, that way if you're nice, I keep working and wrap up everything happily, perhaps even trying to delay my new job to finish a project. But, if you aren't nice, I'm spared all the actual hassle of my week at work, still got the coffee and donuts, payed for the whole day, and I get to imagine you justifying the huge expense of everyone twiddling their thumbs because they're waiting on my bugfixes that I hadn't reassigned to anyone else, etc...

You see, these security nazis... their silly policies interfere with things they couldn't begin to contemplate, their interference can cause tons of PR problems, etc. Incalculable losses. Better to just fire them immediately. No thinking VP or HR manager ever keeps one of these loose cannons on staff. The potential liability is enormous.

Re:What did you expect?

[arivanov]

This is essentially the American attitude HR (though it is gaining foothold elsewhere). It is the assumption that you are a retard and going to put in peril the rest of your career doing something utterly silly during the 2 weeks notice you have left. It is best described as utterly stupid. After all if you wanted to do something you could have done it before handing your resignation. Further to that are you sure that they have revoked your access from "really" everywhere? I had similar experience while working for an American corp. When I resigned the IT security revoked my user access from everywhere. What they forgot to revoke (and in fact could not revoke) was my root access from two thirds of the European systems. He had to be very unkindly reminded by my boss that A) He did not do his job correctly and gave him a list of systems where he did not revoke my access. After that he formally requested risk assessment and the estimate for potential damage to the systems where they did not correctly disable my access. B) If I actually wanted to make a dogs breakfast of my career I could have done it 100 times. As a result I had my access reinstated for the remainder of my notice period. And the idiots lost their bonus. Essentially it is not you who is unprofessional. It is the majority of American HR which have no idea about the level of damage an average SysAdmin can make and treat them the same as Aales. What HR does not know is that there is a long history of the industry dealing with the few that do damage. Everyone knows the cases like the Dixon's payroll triggers so noone will actually do it nowdays. Sales is a different story - they are expected by their new employer to have stolen the customer database and bring all of their contacts and accounts with them.

Re:What did you expect?

[Skynyrd]

Really - this is SOP in many, if not most places. At my company, anyone with "sensitive" access is immediately revoked upon receipt of written resignation. Period.

A former place of employment was so bad, that when I was leaving on poor terms, I was asked (by the head of HR) for "all the passwords I knew". I had to explain that if I told them to him, I'd still know them and could use them. He was shocked when I informed him that his IS staff would have to figure out how to change a hundred passwords.

It was a great place to leave.

Re:What did you expect?

[WNight]

We get that. But if you look beyond the instant you can see that rude and distrusting behaviour to an employee not only turns them off, but all of your current employees.

You've got self-interest, but the smart money is on enlightened self interest - you know, looking at the big picture. Do you cook or feed a golden goose?

Re:What did you expect?

[Muhammar]

Once, I made mistake of telling my boss that he needed to look for my replacement. (We were all working nights and weekend through, for more than 5 months without letoff - and I did not want to let others down by quiting suddenly.) My boss was instructed by his superiors to make me to put it into writinge - "so that they can officialy start interviewing for my position". On Friday afterneoon I wrote a note that I intended to quit in about 4-6 weeks. The next Monday morning my keycard would not work. A guard + an HR doofus were waiting for me, with a box prepared. The argument was that I "might try" to hire away some other employees. That's why they "shifted forward" my own resignation date. I wrote few letters and suddenly I found a check worth extra 2 months. HR from headquarters called me and explained that they "overpaid me by accident but they did not want me to return the money."

(Btw. I just learned that they are now going out of business.)

So the professional way is: 1) Call your boss home, Saturday noon, that you are leaving next Monday. (So that he will have time to calm down). 2) On Monday morning, bring a cake and orange juice with you. While others are running around looking very stressed, offer them something sweet and tell them that you are really going to miss them.

Re:What did you expect?

[mwvdlee]

Why do you think a security officer (the one who makes these decissions) would personally know every single employee in a large company well enough to make a decission based on how much you can be trusted?

Although it isn't a nice way te end a working relationship this way, certain positions (such as most in IT) require secrecy and the risk of one employee "flipping the bird" at his soon-to-be-ex-employer is often too large.

I don't think situations such as this should be taken personally unless you're the only employee who would get this treatment in a similar situation.

Re:What did you expect?

[16K Ram Pack]

I agree about the risk POV. Someone who's worked for you loyally for a few years is going to all of a sudden wreck your systems on their way out?

Everywhere I've worked (nearly 20 years), people work their notice, and no-one ever decided to throw a spanner in the works. Ever. Even if hacked off, they just want out. They might want a job somewhere and a referral from a co-worker. If someone maliciously damaged a system on their way out, I wouldn't want to work with them again.

All that said, most people I've spoken to are just glad to get marched out the door. In most cases, they phoned their next employer and asked if they could start Monday, resulting in a nice bonus of an additional month of salary.

Re:What did you expect?

[WarwickRyan]

...and they'd not have already done that before they handed in their resignation?

More likely they'd spent that time surfing the web and chatting to people.

Re:What did you expect?

[SanityInAnarchy]

I don't know about you, but in a sysad job, I usually hack together quite a few custom scripts, and I like to take them with me. Neither me nor my employer considers it "their" property if I, for instance, roll my own punchin/punchout system that emails my hours to the boss. Not that I'd be heartbroken to lose it, but it would be a PITA.

And yeah, I should be backing that up, but I generally let my bosses know what I'm up to. Try to make friends, have mutual respect.

OTOH, what have they got to lose, at that point? If I wanted to cause problems for the company, I'd do that before giving them my notice, or any sign that I'm looking for work elsewhere. If I didn't want to cause such problems, the last couple weeks would be better spent documenting my work or training my replacement than sitting on my ass -- not to mention that the new admin could call me up if he had problems.

Re:What did you expect?

[SanityInAnarchy]

If you concede the parent post's point, thought...

It's not like they're terminating you at the moment you learned you were leaving. ...Your point makes no sense. Alright, I concede that the higher-ups might have a hard time understanding this, but if the employee did something grievious after giving notice, why fire the HR flack or VP who didn't fire them? After all, a malicious person is just as likely to do something bad after giving notice as before, so you're effectively firing the HR/VP for not being psychic enough to know whether the employee would do something bad, ever.

To summarize, it's a pointless "security" measure, and the only reason it's implemented is office politics among those who can't tell how pointless it is.

Re:What did you expect?

[IngramJames]

Sorry, but if I wrote it, its MINE. Copyright law is clear on that. Its copyright ME the minute I write it. No notice necessary. Law trumps policy.

if someone sent it to me, it's MINE.

That only applies to your own, personal email account and documents you write using your personal equipment on your personal time. Companies also have legal rights, and while you're sitting at your desk using company equipment, you are part of the company. In the same way that if an employee of a company writes you an email from a company email account and they slander you, you sue the company - not the individual. That email was the company's email. Not the employee's.

If you are referring to the code you write, then the same applies. If it didn't, then vast swathes of MS source code would be open now, as any employee who left the company would be able to release anything they wrote into the PD.

Re:What did you expect?

[RawGutts]

You kidding me, H.R are the biggest idiots they are the same people who are looking for certain "Keywords" on the resume and could not care less about hiring a "good" IT person. H.R. folks are clueless wonders of the world.

Re:What did you expect?

[Rogue974]

You could have done all kinds of things ahead of time just as easily as after putting in the two weeks. Let us not all forget that any such acts, before or after are criminal and if caught, there can be repecussion, i.e. civil lawsuits for damamged! If you do malicious things and they can find evidence of it, you are liable!

My HR director worked at a facility where they fired the facility manager. He was a bit of a quack, which is part of the reason he was being fired, but a nice enough guy. They allowed him to go around the facility with HR escort to say goodbye to a few people after they fired him. As he walked by the production machine, he walked over to a control console and hit the main e-stop button and then whith his escort left the building never to return. It didn't take but a couple of days for the corporate lawyers to have the suit drawn up and file for damamges.

The company cutting off access is just covering themselves against possible wacko's. Don't let it bug you, take the pay, have a party, take your gf out to a fancy dinner and have a good time....hold on a sec, posting to /....I meant... take the pay, go home buy a new computer and have fun playing games and streaming porn for 2 weeks! GF for a /. user...what was I thinking!! ;)

Re:What did you expect?

[rgbscan]

Also working for a large national bank, it's standard OP for some of our positions as well. Let's say your a Private Banker or Securities Broker with a clientele built up. Even if you have no intention of doing anything malicious you are still a risk to the bank. In conversation with your clients you may mention off-hand that you are leaving the company. You may be working a customer issue requiring follow-up and you'll have to let your client know that starting next week their contact on this issue will be someone else. Even though you have the honest intentions of making a seamless transition and tying up loose ends, you might just take some of our business out the door with you, even unintentionally.

Risk mitigation isn't just about reducing malicious losses, its about protecting future business. As noble as your intentions might be, you become a risk to future business as soon as you change your voicemail message indicating there is a new contact for your customers due to you leaving the company.

Re:What did you expect?

[keraneuology]

When I was laid off from one major company (outsourced to provide support at another major company) the boss-type person was amazed that I actually stuck it through until the last day, continuing to work as if nothing had happened. It was unfathomable to the powers that be that they could announce a layoff and have the person continue to show up day after day: the very thought that somebody would treat them better than they treated him made their little heads explode.

Re:What did you expect?

[r0ckflite]

Are you like 15 years old or something? They were polite. They probably had a policy. They politely paid him and let him go. There is nothing unethical about that. He wasn't treated like a criminal, people weren't looking over his shoulder. Are you injecting personal experiences into his story? I would love to be walked out when I gave two weeks notice. The only thing I'd want would be a few hours to say goodbye to some friends at the company.

Re:What did you expect?

[dubiousmike]

Next time, give 4 weeks notice. ;)

Re:What did you expect?

[indifferent children]

On the off-chance that you are not trolling: Anything that the company is paying you to write (emails, source code, music, etc) is considered a "work for hire", and the copyright belongs to the company not to you. If you keep a copy that they have not authorized, then you are violating their copyright.

Re:What did you expect?

[chunews]

Well written! (Sorry, I'm not a moderator so I can't mod you up any). To share my very similar case: I recently left a very large financial institution, and on very good terms. I gave 3 weeks notice, which reflected the position, responsibility, and trust I had built up over the 5+ years at the company.

We were able to work all sorts of things out, just as if we were negotiating for a new-hire. For example, I asked my Vacation time to be extended "on book" so I wouldn't have the possible tax implication of receiving a lump-sum final payout of unused vacation days; this also let me carry forward health benefits until my new job started, I worked diligently until the very last day, they threw me a party.

And the company would hire me back in an instant, with no hesitation.

Re:What did you expect?

[Anonymous Coward]

Be careful. There is a similar law in Virginia, but there is a distinct difference between a 'reference' and a 'past employer'. In Virginia, past employers are only allowed to answer two questions: Did this person work for you? and Would you rehire them? If someone is designated a reference-personal, professional, past employer, mailman, whatever-they can answer ANY question posed to them.

There was an incident at a retail shop I worked at in high school (15 years ago) where a former employee put the manager of the store she resigned from as a 'reference' on her resume. This employee was far from being a model for the company and was actually very close to being fired at the time she quit. The hiring manager where she was applying for a new job called her previous manager/reference and was told all the lovely things she did for our company (sarcasm intended). She sued, and the case was dismissed because she identified her former manager as a reference and was therefor not bound by the two question rule.

Oh and I agree with the first poster to this article. You should be completely ready to go the instant you hand your resignation to your supervisor. All your data backed up, all your passwords and such ready to hand over, yadda-yadda-yadda. You should also have KNOWN the policies for separation if you worked for the company for any length of time. I'm sure you weren't the first person to resign/quit the department during your tenure? Part of being a 'professional' is doing your homework!

Re:What did you expect?

[Syberghost]

We have one position where two people in a row resigned by standing up in the middle of a meeting and yelling "well then you can find somebody else to do this job" and walking out.

I think they've gone through three more people since then, although none of them have quit the company; we're a great company, it's just a particularly sucky position.

The first guy's wife still works here. I'm told they offered her the position, and she started laughing.

Re:What did you expect?

[Syberghost]

I know of a contractor once who looked up from his desk and saw his boss from the contracting company going into the office of his boss at the client. Ordinarily this guy would have stopped by to say hello first, but he didn't. The contractor assumed, correctly it turns out, that he was going to be fired. He immediately started erasing entire systems.

Now, that company handles things very differently. If you're going to be fired, somebody will come get you and escort you to a conference room. There will be a security guard with them. While you're in that conference room, somebody will be locking your accounts. If you're a contractor, they won't call your boss to come in; they'll talk to him over the phone.

Fortunately everything was backed up. But think what would have happened had this dork gotten two weeks of notice? He could very well have started by corrupting all the backups, and set up his erasing to be automatic and take out EVERYTHING.

Now imagine you're the IT policy maker who allowed that to happen, and the shareholders are looking for who to sue.

Re:What did you expect?

[poot_rootbeer]

I am a contractor now, having shunned full time work myself. Why? because it is my experience that companies are in it for themselves regardless of the impact the have for their employees.

That's funny, because as an IT decisionmaker at a company, I have shunned contractors. Why? because it is my experience that contractors are in it for themselves regardless of the impact the have for the company that's giving them money.

Re:What did you expect?

[Anonymous Coward]

I'm assuming that happend in the USA.

The poor employee protection in the US is one of the reasons that I'd be extrememly cautious about accepting a job in the US. While i'm sure most employers are decent, I won't always know that before I start work.

My current contract (I'm full time) in the UK requires me to give 1 months notice, and the company I believe is also requried to give me 1 months (it might be just 2 weeks, not sure the amount of time increases with service time) notice. The only time I could be just "fired" on the spot would be for cause, i.e. I'd stolen something, attacked someone or something else sufficiently serious to warrant immediate dismissal.

If a company had tried what they did here to the lady you mentioned they'd have been in serious troulble.

As to leaving professionally... no one has ever been escorted out of the building here when they resigned. The only time I have heard of that happening was when someone was fired for cause, and that was before my time.

Should I resign from this company at any time... I'd expect to be working in the office until the last day. I consider that professional because since they are paying me, I should be working.

Re:What did you expect?

[thparker]

Your probably right. But I don't think that makes it right. Think most people can get severance packages negotiated at the time they are hired? What makes (most) upper managers any different? The fact that they have pointy hair and MBAs?

No, most people can't do that. But most people don't have the same liability, either. CxO positions are officers of the company. They're on the hook. Look at Scrushy from HealthSouth -- he's been found not guilty (no comment on whether I think he actually did anything wrong) but he still faces enormous civil lawsuits related to his management of the company. Yes, some of these guys are unethical, bad guys -- but that's irrelevant in a society where anyone can sue for almost anything, and where big law firms have networks in place to seek out a representative plaintiff so they can initiate class action lawsuits. (As an aside, I had a friend who was an attorney at a big law firm for awhile. He'd get regular broadcast voicemails soliciting help in finding initial plaintiffs -- "We're seeking an individual who owned XXX stock between Date1 and Date2.")

And under Sarbanes-Oxley, the CEO is signing documentation stating that he knows -- absolutely knows -- that the numbers are accurate. (Yeah, this is a gross oversimplification, and there are also numerous people in the chain who must make similar representations.) I'm not certain how this helped anything -- are we to believe that the CEO really knows what the accounting clerk in the subsidiary in Tuvalu is doing?

With the liability that comes with these jobs, the incentives have to be good for people to take them. You'd be mad not to require a pretty hefty package up front. $1 million a year is great until you're named in a class action suit claiming you're responsible for the last stock market correction that vaporized half a billion dollars of market cap.

This doesn't invalidate your point -- that there are a lot of bastards out there who walk away with enormous gain for themselves while leaving the company in tatters.

Re:What did you expect?

[Mr_Perl]

Frankly, contractors are all in it for themselves by the nature of the relationship, as is the company, but only the stupid ones would do anything that negatively impacts the company they are working for.

In many years of contracting I've always found it better to consider the impact on the company (price expectations, etc) as a factor in every job, and this has been rewarding in that when the company does well, I do well and continue to get to work with people that I enjoy a positive working relationship with.

I do avoid working for project managers with hostile outlooks though. Some managers are just unreasonable (wishing to exploit you as if you were slave labor) and not worth it. They are very easy to spot at the start for the most part.

A few of these are justifiably pessimistic, having been taken advantage of previously, these types are usually ok once they see you have the right work ethic, etc.

Re:What did you expect?

[ScrewMaster]

The last full-time position from which I resigned was some twenty years ago. The day before I resigned I removed the few personal items from my office (I mean, why wait until after you're escorted out to try and retrieve your personal property? If you're going to quit, prepare for it.) Coincidentally, the next morning I was called come into the owners' office (both of them) and was asked if I really wanted to work for them. I said, "no", and after they got over the shock (it took them several seconds to recover) of one of their programmers say he'd rather be elsewhere, they hauled out the big company checkbook and wrote me my final paycheck and severance pay, according to my contract. I was then asked to clean out my office: more shock when I told them I already had, so I just left the building and that was that.

Truth is, more than most other kinds of employees, software engineering and IT personnel are dangerous to have around if their loyalties are no longer squarely aligned with the organization's own. Could a janitor cause a corporation-wide dislocation in network operations? Could a mid-level manager insert a time-bomb into source for the company's latest product? Certain classes of employee, if so motivated, can produce negative impact that extends well beyond their immediate workgroups.

I agree with another poster, it's generally worse when a worker is fired than when he leaves of his own accord: but sometimes that leaving is motivated by issues that might cause him or her to do something stupid on the way out. The best thing a company can do is accept that the employee is no longer theirs, lock them out of any resources to which they had access, and escort them out of the building. In most cases that I know of, they are allowed to return to their office under supervision to retrieve their belongings. That is the most "professional" way to handle it. At that point, all that matters is whether the company honors its remaining obligations to that worker (severance pay, continuity of benefits, etc.)

Re:What did you expect?

[iamacat]

IT professionals have a lot of responsibility and a lot of power, and can seriously f-up a company with a few clicks. Any sane employer doesn't want that to happen.

Critical thinking 101: If an IT person wanted to mess up the system, he/she would put the means to do so in place before giving the resignation notice. Any sane employer rewards considerate behavior that goes beyond job description. They may well want this guy to come and fix some small problem later.

What's the question again?

[XorNand]

Umm... what's the question again? You did resign in a professional manner. Is this the first real IT job that you've had? What you experienced is standard operating procedure for any organization with even a half-assed security policy. They aren't your computers. Why are you taking it so personally, esp. since they've paid you for those two extra weeks? ::rolls eyes::

What I'd like to know is what didn't make the front page because this got posted instead?

Re:What's the question again?

[lewp]

Is this the first real IT job that you've had?

Stating the obvious, but... DING DING DING!

This happens everywhere, and is normal in IT. It's two extra weeks of paid vacation from somewhere you obviously didn't want to work anyway. What's the fucking problem?

Re:What's the question again?

[RodgerDodger]

Well, as you say, the OP got paid anyway, but...

In every job I've had that I've left (five in the last 12 years), I've never had my access cut off until I actually leave. I've always worked until the last day, and I would be surprised if an employer didn't want me to. Mind you, I've never been fired, and in all but one case, I was actually on fairly good terms with my employer. I've never even heard of employers terminating access for people who are leaving of their own accord.

As a matter of fact, in most of the occasions I've left a job, I needed to keep access to the last minute to assist with a smooth handover of my work.

In a situation where an employee has notified their employer that they wish to resign, there is no security risk in letting them keep their access (and do their job) until they leave. If they were disgruntled and were going to do anything nasty, they would already have done it prior to tendering notice.

(It's a very different situation if the employee is let go, of course)

Re:What's the question again?

[ThJ]

I think the thing is that he actually wanted to say on for the last two weeks. He gave two weeks -notice-. He didn't say "I'll just leave now and you can stop paying me in 2 weeks" he said "I'm working now but I'll leave in two weeks". They cut him off immediately, almost as if they didn't quite understand his notice or something...

Re:What's the question again?

[syousef]

What you experienced is standard operating procedure for any organization with even a half-assed security policy.

Any organisation that's going to be afraid of what their IT professional is going to do once they've decided to leave, and who is still under an employment contract has real problems. If you can't trust the people you employ when they're obligated to you, why can you trust them to stay when they haven't handed in their resignation?

Perhaps the culture is a little different in Australia, but I've never been locked out of a computer system just because I resigned. They've gotten every day's work out of me that they could - it was expected that I remain professional.

Honestly if someone's going to do damage to a company they'd just do it before they send their letter of resignation. If you can't trust your staff under the usual safeguards once they say they're leaving, you don't have a decent security policy to speak of anyway.

Access should be terminated on the last day of employment.

Re:What's the question again?

[RodgerDodger]

You are a risk, you wanted to terminate the employment relationship, and your employer wanted to terminate the risk you pose.

Excuse me, but... where's the risk? Anything the OP wanted to do to "trash the system" could have been done before he handed his notice in. How does immediately cutting him off (and probably pissing him off in the process) decrease the risk?

Re:What's the question again?

[Ryan Amos]

Basically, if a disgruntled employee stole client data and said clients sued the company, it would cost several hundred/thousand times more than just paying him not to do the 2 weeks of halfassed work anyway (come on, you can't tell me everyone gives 100% when they know they're out of there.) To a suit writing policy, avoiding that kind of risk exposure is worth paying the guy to play video games.

It's nothing personal, and it shouldn't be taken as such. It's all about risk management, not your relationship with your employer. A vacation between jobs is never a bad idea anyway.

Re:What's the question again?

[Uriel]

Companies can get discounts on insurance if they drug test employees, I believe.

it's not a professional or civilized world

[yagu]

Up front Disclaimer: I am a disgruntled former employee of a Telco... laid off after 21 years

You, kind sir, proffered as professional a resignation as necessary. There are no reciprocal gaurantees, and in the IT field it is more typical than not for you to be treated nearly as if you were a criminal.

Systems you once managed for your employers now are at risk. Former peers are now potential spies. Do not be surprised to be treated like you have some sort of exotic, deadly, contagious disease. Don't expect anything for references other than affirmation you actually did work there.

This is the fine world of trust we have achieved as a civilised and evolved society. Trust not.

I will still always give professional courtesy (e.g., sufficient lead time for resignation) but I've left the corporate world with a sour aftertaste.... It sucks, that's just the way it is.

Re:it's not a professional or civilized world

[bobscealy]

Just because you have user accounts cancelled and the like it doesnt mean that the company you work for is being hateful or unprofessional in any way, they are just protecting thier interests. In fact, it is probably a good thing even for you that you have access revoked where you could cause damage - how many times does someone tender a resignation and when something goes wrong 3 days before they leave it is automatically thier fault. It seems like in this guys case the employer has actually been quite nice to them, even if it seems a little abrupt.

Re:it's not a professional or civilized world

[Lumpy]

exactly right.

Besides you should have disabled all those system account services that were going to detonate and take lots of things with them a year+ 1 month after your accounts were disabled BEFORE you put in your letter of resignation... they are there for sweet revenge in case of downsizing right?

Ok, all joking aside. When you tendered your letter you should have already had everything in order BEFORE you handed it in. All personal items already removed from your office/cubicle. All your code and porn backed up on a CD already in your possesion, your work computers sanitized and swept clean, your pet projects documented so the next guy can live with them for the 30 days he takes to rip them out and put his ideas in place instead..... etc...

It's not only IT, any professional job they hit you in the arse with the door the moment you resign. most companies have way too much sensitive or percieved sensitive information they they becom instantly paranoid about the second you announce you are becoming an "OUTSIDER".

I do strongly suggest anyone even thinking of resigning or outright quitting in a blaze of glory sanitize their workspace and machines, anything you leave behind will come back to haunt you later if it is something you are not proud to leave behind.

In a side note, any awards you may have won, It's not a bad idea to leave them behind at that empty desk. At your new workplace they will only serve to piss off your new coworkers and make your integration that much more difficult.

Re:it's not a professional or civilized world

[Lord_Dweomer]

"your pet projects documented so the next guy can live with them for the 30 days he takes to rip them out and put his ideas in place instead"

You know.....speaking of projects in progress and documentation...If they're going to cut you off from systems as soon as you give your letter, you might as well leave it undocumented. Particularly if you don't like the company and want to get back at them.

You see, they might need critical documentation from you...and if you're no longer an employee there, well...I'm sure you'd be more than happy to provide said documentation as a consultant with your hourly fee of 4x what they were paying you.

Re:it's not a professional or civilized world

[grammar nazi]

Good call Lumpy. I consider what you stated to be 'standard operating procedure'. You don't want to burn bridges... even if you know your projects will not be continued and you hate the firm. I left a firm that, after i left, blamed me for everything. My ex-coworker told me a quote that the evil much-hated director said about me... "His performance was bad, but at least he wrapped up his work here nicely when he quit." I spent my last 2 weeks documenting and wrapping up my projects. I didn't work long hours during those two weeks (everybody worked long hours at that firm) but i worked hard and non-stop during the day to make sure everything was ready to be handed off.

It's not a matter of vengeance or 'getting back' at an evil boss or faceless firm. It's more of a matter of being professional and always doing the right thing. In my case i hated the boss and the director of my dept. I felt that if i finalize my projects, then i would no better than them. I knew i was much better than them and acted that way.

Re:it's not a professional or civilized world

[yason]

It's not only IT, any professional job they hit you in the arse with the door the moment you resign. most companies have way too much sensitive or percieved sensitive information they they becom instantly paranoid about the second you announce you are becoming an "OUTSIDER".

This is flawed thinking by the companies. The formal letter of resignation changes nothing since the employee is the one who will decide when to resign. The employee has already retired in his mind days or weeks before that.

If he is evil, the timebombs are already set up on the servers, the company data is already harvested, copied and distributed out of the building and the letter of resignation comes last. If he's not and his accounts and access rights are removed, he won't -- probably contrary to his expectations -- be able to properly finish off his work, document everything for the successor and clean up any irrelevant stuff like temporary and personal files. The next employee will step into a mess, and this is all bad for the company.

Sounds like you did the right thing

[hedronist]

Based on how you described it, you probably did nothing wrong, and they probably did the right thing.

Companies are rightfully paranoid that a departing employee -- particulalrly one with root access -- may decide to do something nasty on the way out the door. This doesn't mean that *you* would do this, just that they can't take a chance. Of course, if you had intended to do something nasty, you could easily have set it up before tendering your resignation. The best thing to do is act like a professional and understand that what is in your best interest and in the company's best interest are no longer related.

Re:Sounds like you did the right thing

[jgc7]

I agree.
What is the professional thing to do?
I assume by that comment, you are asking what is the professional thing to do now? We'll... since you likely got screwed out of telling your co-workers goodbye, send them a note to schedule a happy hour at a bar.

obviously...

[Capella or Bust]

Take all of your vacation, THEN resign. Duh.

Re:obviously...

[spicyjeff]

By law, in the United States at least, an employeer must award or compensate an employee for any vacation time earned by the time of termination.

I'll assume they're paying you...

[NevDull]

If you got an extra two weeks of vacation, enjoy it.

When I quit HP, they paid me to stay at home for two weeks, and my unused vacation. 6 weeks of pay for 2 weeks at home. Time to recover and prepare for my new job, buy new clothes, and figure out the bus schedule.

The professional way to handle it is to stop whining and enjoy.

Well, you did well, but broke the golden rule...

[sH4RD]

Don't complain about it to Slashdot.

My way is fun...

[Highlordexecutioner]

Although it is not very professional.

Of course mine was just my review, but it sort of acted like a resignation letter.

Strengths: Over the last six months I have had the opportunity to learn how to smile when given projects that offer no challenge at all. Furthermore I can now hide my disdain for co-workers that have more in common with parasitic worms than with human beings. I've also grown to recognize the importance of recognition via comparison. For instance, I recognize that our environment here at (insert company name here) is really wonderful compared to other companies - the same way Syphilis is a great improvement over A.I.D.S.. Then there is the multitude of tasks that I can do with my eyes closed. It's truly a wonder how many mundane tasks I can accomplish with no effort at all. And lastly there is my recent discovery of how to divide by zero.

Weaknesses: Sometimes, I have trouble accepting that I actually am flawless.

Re:My way is fun...

[bisscuitt]

On the same lines, here is the Resignation Letter I Handed to my inept management 2 weeks ago:

---SNIP---
Being sound of mind, I Tender my Eventual resignation from kingston communications. My Years of Service Here Inevitably Need to Yield to a Marked End. The Achievements of my time here have Left me with Assorted Specialised Skills which will endeavour to help me in my future career.

I hereby give notice of my resignation from Today.
---SNIP---

As expected, the inept management didn't figure out the hidden message.

I Then Proceed to go to the XMAS Party. I got very drunk, Shook the CEO's had and said "I've learnt a lot working here." and asked him to kiss the inflatable sheep I stole from the bar.

Now, That's a Professional Resignation.

I still havn't been Frog Marched from the building! Despite several idle threats to compromise the security of the ISP I am working for.

And that's why I'm a consultant

[Wabbit Wabbit]

how do you computer and IT professionals out there put in your notice of resignation (if you are with a permanent employer, and not contractual), and not get immediately shutdown, and shunned away from the computers?

That's why I've been a consultant for, oh, just about the past 12 years (more or less). Even then, I've tried to be good and give 2-4 weeks notice when I saw things going south, but management never seems to appreciate it, even when you offer to document your work, make yourself available for a brief period after you leave, etc...

Fact is, the moment you resign, you're a pariah. But if you do all the "right things" you can at least leave with a good conscience, and not have anything come back to haunt you.

You did the right thing... it's their problem.

[Big Sean O]

It seems like IT professionals are getting like investment brokers: when you give them two weeks notice they give you the money and ask you to leave.

I don't think it's anything personal. It's just the way some businesses nowadays prefer to operate. I think it's a mistaken attempt at managing risk. Think about it: would a guy who wants to screw you over give two weeks notice? No, they'd do you dirt and take off with no notice.

Re:You did the right thing... it's their problem.

[IntlHarvester]

I had an old boss that taught me this trick about 10 years ago -- When a sysadmin quits, give him a two week paid vacation and immediately change all the passwords. Most of them had something lined up anyways, and if they weren't backdooring things, they were just going to sit around shorttiming it.

Funny thing was nearly every system admin that resigned attempted to access the systems during their enforced vacation. Probably nothing malicious, but since you don't know that, it's a wise policy.

Re:You did the right thing... it's their problem.

[ucblockhead]

Honestly, it could be worse. There are shitheads that would have cut off his access and demanded that he come in for two weeks anyway.

You did the right thing..

[adamgreenfield]

.. but I can also understand your employers position.

While as a ethical professional you wouldn't do anything malicious with your access, that doesn't mean everyone in your position wouldn't. Granted, people who plan to act maliciously generally don't do so after putting in notice, from their point of view, it is better safe than sorry.

You get your pay (which is pretty nice of them), you did the right thing. I wouldn't take their actions personally.

Random Thoughts...

[PocketPick]

From what it sounds like, you did everything right. Two weeks is an excellent time period to offer notice. You aren't dropping out of the company like a light, but you also aren't creating an awkward, 'lame-duck' position where the company has to keep the thought in the back of thier head that you're leaving in say, 6 months.

Also, unless you're leaving for competition, the CIO probably didn't think you were going to 'do something malicious'. It's probably just company protocol, and in fact, I would consider the quick removal of accounts to be 'lite'. I've worked at companies where as the minute strikes your time of non-employment, 2 security guards immedietally escort you out of the building.

Re:Random Thoughts...

[Anonymous Coward]

A friend of mine (an IT consultant) gave his employer almost 2 months notice. Worthy to mention, he was on a newly acquired H1-B visa, but he decided he wanted to go back to his country of origin to work there. Not only he wasn't escorted out by security staff, but his boss gave him advice on how to negotiate with his new company. All in turn for a good feedback on the exit sheet. I'm not kidding at all.

On the other hand, I was laid off a bit over one year ago. I was told about it on a Friday (I'm guessing it always happens on a Friday...) at 4pm. By 4:10pm my account was no longer operational. Like my first idea would've been "Let's steal these guys' buggy code and sell it to their rivals!". Duh. It does leave a bitter taste in your mouth. I shaked everybody's hands and I only said "F___ you all!" for myself on the way out.

From a security standpoint, your boss has it all covered. From a human relantionship point of view, he was asinine, or has followed an asinine company policy. I'd be surprised to hear this would happen in a lot of places. But in any case, you know you would've been honest, so why do you care if they treat you badly? You wanted to leave anyways, you just lost the (traces of) respect you had for them. Their loss.

This may come out as a cliche, but it's always for the best. My current boss likes me, I got a KC bonus, they're applying for my green card and I'll probably be promoted soon. Given that you resigned, you probably have good plans laid out already. your Enjoy your paycheck and the unexpected vacation.

--B

Re:Random Thoughts...

[dbIII]

It's probably just company protocol

In other words the sign of a HR section that is both out of touch and has too much power. There are very few technical jobs where you can treat people like lego blocks - there is almost always a serious advantage that can be gained by a changeover period where the new person gets to know the site specific details instead of spending days trying to work out - even with very good docs it can take a long time to find the right ones. I've started off in the situation where there was a room of over a dozen NT4 servers and the function of only one was known by the remaining staff - sometimes you don't have time to go through the docs before you have to solve problems (and in that case it was a few days before the docs were even found). Two hours with a former employee may well have saved a couple of hundred hours.

Lucky Bastard

[DeadBugs]

When I resigned in a professional manner, they made me stay the whole 2 weeks. Sometimes they escort people out of the building that day for security reasons and still pay them for the remaining 2 weeks. However, I had to stay and fill out paperwork and go to BS meetings and suffer. What they did to you is pretty standard and has nothing to do with you or how you resigned.

Re:Lucky Bastard

[xenocide2]

Of course, the master's response to the effervescent personality of the nearly-parted is to respond, "Why, yes, it's GREAT that you'll be gone so soon! I only wish we could make it faster!"

That should at least deflate their sails a bit ;)

I resigned about a month ago

[DaveV1.0]

I wrote out a nice letter saying that while I enjoyed working there, I had been offered a better position that I could not refuse and that I would be resigning in two weeks. I kept all my access, and I had physical access to the equipment and back up tapes. I parted on good terms and could go back to my job at any time.

Without knowing your relationship with you company and what your letter said, I can only suggest your boss is a jerk.

It's very common to get "paid out"

[winkydink]

In lieu of keeping you there during your resignation period. Why risk liability over a couple of weeks of sysadmin pay?

my 2 pesos on the situation.....

[schematix]

IMHO both parties in this case did exactly what they were supposed to do. You gave them the courtesty of a 2 week notice and they accepted that and decided it was time to move on. In work environments today that rely heavily on computers and networking, it is not worth it to them that you might be leaving because of a grudge you may have. They have no way of knowing if you are leaving on amicable terms or not. If you have a bridge to burn with them you could easily cost them thousands of dollars (and likely much, much more) in damages due to lost data and productivity.

If it were me I would approach my boss and let them know that if they won't give access, there is no need to be around, but you'll be happy to answer any questions that they might have. However tell them that you'd be more than happy to twiddle your thumbs (in a more polite way) for a couple weeks until you've given them their time. I'd guess that they'd be willing to let you go with pay. If not, Worst case you can try to improve your solitaire skills for a couple weeks and get paid to do it.

In any case, both sides have fulfilled their obligations to each other in a completely professional way.

Re:my 2 pesos on the situation.....

[schematix]

They could always talk to you.

And you could always lie to them.

At will

[Billosaur]

The phrase "at will" is standard in most contracts nowadays, especially in IT. It basically means that they can let you go at any time and you can decide to leave at any time. It's always best to give the standard two weeks notice and tidy everything up before you go, but these days companies really don't care much. They'll let you go, hand you a severance check, and by the end of the day, they've locked you out of their systems.

This just goes to the whole shift in corporate culture, where employees are no longer people, but FTEs, to be tallied, shifted around like pieces on a Risk board, and disposed of when their usefulness is up. I was raised to believe in the old school company, the kind that valued employees and celebrated longevity, but the only way you get to stay past 5 years anymore is to move up the corporate ladder or refuse your yearly pay raise. And even then, with the advent of outsourcing, job security is a fasing concept.

You did the right thing; your company did not.

I guess it depends on where you work.

[mpn14tech]

The places I have worked at and turned in a two week notice, it is usually a 2 week scramble to document everything I did and get some poor unqualified individual up to speed. On the last day I make sure that the new person in charge either disables all accounts I had access to or make sure that they changed the passwords.
You want to eliminate any possibility of doubt if something goes wrong after you leave.
So while their actions may be seem extreme, it really is for your protection as much as it is for theirs. I would not take it so personally.

Took a while but the same thing happened to me...

[jedi_gras]

I submitted my two weeks notice and gave them transition plan outline. About two days later I was called into a room with three HR reps, my manager, a lawyer, and the chief of security. Supposedly, I was working on sensitive information and the lawyer said that it would be prudent if I left immediately. Five minutes later, I was packing up my stuff under supervision of the chief of security and then promptly escorted to my car. They took my parking pass and id and bid me farewell. Of course I was paid for the rest of the two weeks.

No hard feelings, but with concerns over security nowadays, I don't blame employers for going through this extra step. I mean, IF I had done something malicious, what would their course of action be? Besides a lawsuit in which most cases side with the employee not the employer, they couldn't fire me because I had already quit.

Uh, you got a vaction...

[ellem]

This is EXACTLY how is should be handled. Do NOT let a leaving Sys Admin on you system. You did nothing wrong. They did nothing wrong. Enjoy your end of the year festivities.

What you should have done...

[jafo]

What you should have done is to have copied all of your mp3s and ornpay off the system *BEFORE* you gave your notice. ;-)

Sean

Re:You're not the one with the problem

[Mindwarp]

You did everything professionally, it's the company that is acting immature.

The company isn't 'acting immature', they're acting to limit their security liability. This is Standard Operating Procedure in pretty much every large organization I've worked for, especially if you're high enough up the corporate ziggurat to be privy to confidential information or sensitive software/data.

Take the money, enjoy your two weeks paid vacation, and don't sweat it. It's not personal, it's business!

As said before, this is quite common

[dougmc]

As everybody has said, this is quite common, and there's not much you can do about it beyond picking jobs where they actually trust you (which usually happens in the smaller outfits.)

The next time you resign from an IT job, there are things you should do before you resign if you want them to be done --

-- take your personal computer hardware, books, papers, etc. home. Before you resign. If you wait to do it after, you may not even get the chance (as they show you the door), and you'll have to argue with them about it. And if you do get the chance, they may be watching you like a hawk and you'll have to justify it.

-- same goes for your personal files and stuff you want to save. Save it off the network and computers BEFORE you resign. Some companys are cool about this sort of thing, some aren't. Don't take the risk. This is also a good thing to do if you get wind of layoffs coming up that you might be involved in.

-- If there are any projects you want to see completed before you leave, complete them before you resign.

lucky they paid you

[EvilStein]

I've run into that situation before. They decided to say "Ok, you can go now." and I *didn't* get paid for the remaining two weeks that I had expected to get paid for.

The fun of working in an 'at-will' state.

Generally they think you'll get 'short timers syndrome' and not do anything anyway. It's no wonder people just up & quit these days. The acts of courtesy that an employee extends to a company are very rarely returned.

He's trying to deal with his feelings...

[everphilski]

He made a professional resignation, they said no thanks but paid him for two weeks anyways. This is standard business practice and was financially beneficial for him. (two weeks free pay?)

What he's probably dealing with is the feeling of rejection: if they could drop him on a days notice was he really needed? He'll just have to be honest with himself about that but he will just have to get over that himself. Again its a standard business practice in many places and not a reflection of his character.

-everphilski-

Re:He's trying to deal with his feelings...

[adrianmonk]

What he's probably dealing with is the feeling of rejection: if they could drop him on a days notice was he really needed? He'll just have to be honest with himself about that but he will just have to get over that himself.

Luckily for him, that'll probably be an easy thing to deal with, because he resigned from a position as a system administrator.

Chances are, he's going to get a phone call sometime in the next few weeks asking him for some key piece of knowledge they didn't even know they needed. It may even be something he explained to them numerous times but they just ignored. At which point, he can respond in one of three ways, any of which will soothe the pain of rejection quite adequately:

1. Just give 'em the information. Knowing they asked means you have the last laugh, so why rub it in?
2. "I'm sorry, what company did you say you're with? Hmm, no, as a matter of fact that doesn't ring a bell at all. And you're sure I worked there? Recently, you say? Why, that's remarkable."
3. "Your e-mail address is still $foo, right? Ah, OK, good. I'm sending you an e-mail with my rate card right now."

Due Diligence

[Kadin2048]

I think the reason this is done, even though it seems illogical on the surface, is because of the company's responsibility to act with "due diligence" in regards to security.

If you as an employee compromise the system or act as some sort of mole or corporate spy, after you're busted when the shareholders come down on your boss, he can say "Well, hey we had no way of knowing he was bent, we had no warning that this was about to happen. It could happen to anybody."

But let's say you put in your resignation, then backdoored their network on your way out because they didn't cut off your access until two weeks later. This time when the Powers That Be come looking for blood, your boss is SOL: he could try saying "well, we had no idea he was bent..." but the shareholders are just going to respond "He had just turned in his resignation! He was on his way out the door! Why did he still have access?" And your boss becomes the next one on the chopping block, and depending on the nature of the business possibly liable for fines as well.

So really your boss, and your boss' boss, and probably their boss' boss, all the way up the CoC, are just covering their asses by pulling your access as soon as they get a hint that you're not going to be a career employee.

Re:In my experience

[tomhudson]

For all the talk of rights there's only one thing true at the end of the day: If you're an at-will employee then you are completely at the mercy of the employ

Let me rephrase that: For all the talk of rights there's only one thing true at the end of the day: backups and dirt beats the odds all the time. I've got 3 complaints going through the system against my former employer, and if I hadn't snagged a copy of everything, time-and-date-stamped files, emails, etc., I wouldn't have a hope in hell. Got 2 more calls from one of the investgators today. So, instead of me being at some asshats mercy, he's probably looking at an audit. No amount of vaseline will make that comfortable.

Backups. Backups. Backups. It's not just because hard drives fail. So do people.

Corporations as Psychopaths

[Alien54]

explain to me how he is any more of a liability then before he gave notice.

that's right... he isnt.

managers are just jackasses and dont have a grip on reality.

The reason being that the vast majority of corporations would be classified as criminal psychopaths if they were human beings. There is even a big documentary/movie on this point.

Re:Liability

[Maxo-Texas]

Unfortunately, they have insurance liability if they don't lock you out and something bad happens.

Because someone, somewhere gave notice and then got mad during the last 2 weeks and did something nasty.

I would agree...

[jd]

...both sides did the right thing. For a traditional IT infrastructure, with root accounts, etc. This is one reason I don't like traditional IT infrastructures - root accounts can be abused by admins (as well as system crackers, viruses, etc) and are simply too damn vulnerable and too damn powerful.

Part of the problem with the popular alternative (role-based computing, where a designated operation is associated with one or more designated roles, and - ideally - no superuser exists at all) is that nobody has figured out a way to do this efficiently. There tend to be very few IT staff, relative to the number of roles, so role-based computing tends to involve a lot of account switching.

In the end, though, you really don't want system administrators mucking about with content, or content administrators changing the system. If you could just guarantee that, then the threat of a rogue system admin is greatly lessened. Not eliminated, sure, but definitely reduced.

Of course, this begs three important questions. First, what company is so oblivious to the mental welfare of their employees that they could not distinguish a responsible employee from a potential psychopath? (Other than all of them, that is.)

Secondly, what company is so degenerate as to turn someone they've obviously trusted for some considerable time - and therefore know pretty well - into a madman with a vendetta? Sure, some people are evil, some are malicious, and others are ill, but all of those fall into question one for any meaningful timeframe. It seems reasonable to assume that those who are left have been subject to some level of degradation for retaliation on the way out to be plausible. In which case, fixing abuse in the workplace would seem to be a superior solution.

The third question is why are mission-critical systems being left to a single individual? Even outside of hostility, accidents happen and mistakes occur. If a system is so damn mission-critical that any level of threat - however remote the possibility - is unacceptable, then you should be making it dual-key. Then, if a single admin goes nuts, it doesn't make any difference. The other admin doesn't confirm the operation, so nothing happens.

So, yeah, with all the existing systems out there and traditional IT departments with their dodgy office politics, when a person resigns, it is certainly proper and correct to place them on leave with pay. Where companies have high turnover, it is also the proper and correct way to go bankrupt - you're doing less and spending more.

A better design of environment (from the computer OS to the politics of the workplace) should all but eliminate the need of such mechanisms, but since these do not exist in most places, that option does not exist either.

Make your letter of resignation short

[kiwicmc]

One guy I worked with wrote a three page letter detailing the company and all senior management's flaws. Depending on how big the pond you live in is, this is not a good idea ...

C

2 tips: backup + behaviour

[otisg]

1) Before resigning, no matter how professionally, ensure you have all your data with you. No, not their data, just yours, if you used their resources for your own stuff. Then, regardless of how they react, you will have nothing to worry about.

2) Choose your employer wisely. If you see any signs of them acting inhumane with other employees, leave, and do it as described under 1).

The best way to quit IMO:

[neo]

Reverse Firing

In the corporate world you often get reviewed for your performance. The meetings are uncomfortable affairs where your manager goes down a checklist of things that 'could use improvement'. On Quit Your Job Day, you'll be calling a review meeting of your own. Create a list of things the company needs improvement in. Watch your manager squirm as you point out bad health benefits, impenetrable paperwork, inhuman working environments and other OSHA related problems. At the end of your review look your manager straight in the eye and ask 'What would you do if you were me?', pause and then announce 'I'm afraid I'm going to have to let you go.'

More ways to quit at:
http://www.quityourjobday.com/

Re:The best way to quit IMO:

[HermDog]

I had that meeting myself, but I just used my inside voice. It sort of branched off during the one-on-one meeting when I was informed that I wasn't on the bad list, but I wasn't on the good list, either. Using my inside voice, I had my own meeting in which I discovered that

• I only had two lists, and
• they weren't on the good one

My new job is on my good list.

Grand Stand! The Professional Way!

[layer3switch]

[Good]-----
You are fed up. You want to resign. You write a resignation letter and give your boss 2 weeks notice.

Next morning, you found out, all of your access to system is provoked. Your security card to the front door doesn't even work anymore. Security guard watches you with the corner of his eyes constantly. You sweat. You walk over to HR and ask. HR honored your 2 weeks notice 2 weeks early. Now you go home and get paid for 2 weeks vacation.

[Worse]-----
You are fed up. You want to resign. You write a resignation letter and give your boss a finger.

Next morning, you find out, all of your access to system is provoked. Your security card signals the alarm. Security Guard draws pepper spray. You panic. You scream and run away like a little girl. You are home and waiting for UI to come.

[Worst]-----
You are fed up. You want to resign. You write a resignation letter and mail it to your boss's house via USPS with 35 cents stamp.

Next morning, nothing is changed. You walk into your boss's office, demand higher salary and a chance to sleep with his wife. Your boss is not happy. Matter of fact, he is fuming. You smile and say;

"You Biatch~! You just been PUNK'D! I QUIT!" You laugh sarcastically and walk away from your (ex)boss.

Now you are home without UI. You submit question on Slashdot.

Grand Stand! The Professional Way!

Smile and leave, or....

[jdehnert]

The best way to deal with this is calmly and professionally. If they want you out right now just say thanks and go.

If they expect you to remain for those last 2 weeks with no access to the systems, break out a pad and pen and start writing down all of the things you know you have access too, and work with your co-workers to ensure you no longer have access to anything.

On top of that, spend some time to pass along info on those systems you are the only one that knows anything about.

Beyond that it's not bad to sit around and make it known your available to answer questions before your time is up.

Face it, the more professional you are, the better your former employer and co workers will feel about you later. That never hurts when looking for references.

I've never encountered this "SOP" before

[msobkow]

I think the original poster did the right thing by giving notice.

Personally I've never had my system access shut off because I gave notice, but I did have it shut off before I was told I was laid off (many years ago.) However, as I've worked in a number of verticals I know there are a few that disable access to live systems, but let developers keep working during their notice period.

With live/production data, there are often regulations that would prohibit allowing a sysadmin to continue accessing the system after they've given notice. I realize it probably feels insulting to have your access shut off after acting like a professional and giving notice, but I wouldn't take it personally.

Just drop off the key's, Lee...

[catmistake]

Obviously, you should have planned your sabotage prior to resigning.

Re:Just drop off the key's, Lee...

[moro_666]

best sabotage is to be inreplaceable at the moment when you leave... for example if you're the only person around who knows very deep details about an unique framework.

  sure they will finally (and they have to) find someone who can do the job. but as it takes a while, none can really ban your accounts or do anything weird like that, beacuse they still need your support about the open issues. if or not you support them is another question, as i will leave my job hopefully under good friendship and conditions, i will give them some support for a while.

  that's the state i'm currently in. i'm the only person around that really knows whats going on in our server, now i will have to support it for a while even after i leave (out of loyality, i will do it free for a while as long as it doesn't put any real pressure on me) and i will have to teach someone where to start learning the whole business.

  i'm going to switch jobs because my current job doesn't really offer me any real chance to evolve nor any chances to make a longlasting career. i feel like i'm sitting duck on an old framework with old ideas for too long. the rest of the world is moving on and i'm not gonna sit here and wait until i'm an old crappled dude who knows only technologies that are 10 years old.

  sitting duck in knowledge & not knowing if you're going to have the job even after 1-2 years is a really bad idea. (would you hire someone that knows msdos, win 3.1 & basic ? i guess not, neither would i.)

  i hope my boss has sit down when i'm going to tell him about this (no, he is not going to like it). and i hope he'll be reasonable while discussing my terms of leave. and luckily, i am the bloody administrator, so he can't disable my accoutns without my help anyway ...

Re:Just drop off the key's, Lee...

[Minwee]

"If it becomes apparant that you're acting like this, you're a liability, and you're practically gauranteeing you'll be terminated the instant they find a consultant who can fix the mess."

So don't let it become apparent.

Make sure that you have several binders full of documentation sitting on your desk and explain that it outlines in detail exactly how to manage all of the systems that you are responsible for. Also make sure that it is at least a year out of date, contains a minimum of three documents describing each procedure in completely different ways, and has a convenient typo in one critical procedure which will cause complete chaos if followed to the letter.

If anyone asks what will happen to the company if you have to leave just point to the binders in your "Disaster Plan" and tell them not to worry. If you like the people you work with, or want to take an actual vacation at any time, then prepare a small folder with useful directions on how to handle things while you are gone. Keep this one at home and don't ever let a copy leak onto a company owned computer.

Should you ever be fired without good cause you will have the warm inner glow that can only come from knowing that the idiots who did it are left wallowing in the mess that they created. If they try to come after you complaining about acts of sabotage, explain that you tried to produce updated documentation and offered to train your replacement but they were in too much of a hurry to get you out of the building to let you do it.

After all, everything was working fine when you left. It's not your fault that they brought in someone new who made a mess of everything.

Re:Australia isn't First World?

[ozmanjusri]

Australia isn't First World?

He said South Australia. It's different down there, and a little scary. They've named their cricket team after a spider and make beer out of sewage. Their main football team wears the German flag for a jumper, and the state capital was designed by an obsessive-compulsive.

They do brew one some of the best mass-production beers in the country (Coopers), but if you're ever invited to a keg party in a small SA town, run like hell.

Ob Simpson's Quote

[servognome]

Yeah, and why can't they call him the night before and tell him "don't bother coming in tommorrow?"

Marge: The plant called and said if you don't come in on Friday, don't bother coming in on Monday.
Homer: WooHoo! Four day weekend!

I'm a little more forward

[Quiet_Desperation]

I usually just crash a truck into the lobby, unload about 3 tons of high grade manure, shout incoherently in Farsi and give the receptionist an indian burn.

is two weeks really professional? it depends.....

[fl!ptop]

about 2 years ago i resigned from my full-time job w/ 2-weeks notice. i thought 2 weeks was sufficient since i wasn't in the middle of a 6-month project or anything. i telecommuted, and had daily tasks to handle, so my access was not 'cut off' until after i left (i assume - i never tried to ssh back in after i was gone). their attitude was not very cordial, as no one spoke to or emailed me during the last 2 weeks and no exit interview was given.

now, if i had given 2 weeks in the middle of a 6-month project.......well, that seems like it would've been unprofessional.

of course, since i knew 2 months prior the exact date i was turning in my resignation, i had plenty of time to get what i needed - like the email where my project manager explained why i was an employee and not an independent contractor - which came in handy when they told the irs they didn't withhold my taxes because i was an independent contractor.

come to think of it, telling me 'c-ya' and giving 2 weeks pay would've been nice, since the last 2 weeks of working in isolation was kinda weird.

My Experience

[Chagatai]

I've resigned twice in my professional life. In both occasions I gave one day short of two week's notice, and on both occasions I worked until the very last day (where I would leave at about 2:00PM following getting my last paychecks). I intentionally gave that much time so that I could complete the transition, make things smooth, and have a nice turnover to the next guy.

You know what? In both situations my managers chose to sit on their hands and then gave me someone who was technically incompetent with only three days to go. The first time I had to give four years of knowledge to a new college hire who had only about three months of experience. The second time the boss chose to find a "warm body" to whom I could give the information. The "warm body" part was fulfilled, but he was utterly useless aside from that and was asked to leave. I could not figure out why they would wait so long, except that it just accelerates the Chain of Falling.

(The Chain of Falling is the trend that happens when one member of a team leaves and the work gets distributed. Imagine that there is a team of 10 people. One person gets a new job, realizing more money or power is a possibility. The remaining work gets distributed amongst the remaining 9. Then a new person comes onto the team. So, not only has work been increased for everyone, but they also have to train the new guy. The ninth person follows suit, and the pattern continues. Eventually the team is winnowed down to 2 or 3 people who know what they are doing, the remaining 7 have compartmentalized knowledge, and everyone feels stressed and unhappy.)

A tirade, I know, but I just don't get it.

huh?

[Mr. Underbridge]

Contrary to popular belief people do not cause mayhem and mischeif to others for no reason.

What the hell world do you live in? I'd like to emigrate.

Know your State Employment Laws...

[trims]

As it has been said before, it sounds like the OP did the ethical and professional thing in his resignation, and the company opted for the (now fairly standard) rude and unprofessional immediate termination. That said, everyone should know what your state's employment laws are. They vary widely, and give the employee a variety of options and rights, and also can help you set expectations.

I'm going to speak about California, since that's where I work now. IANAL, but I've talked to one about this, and you should too. It's cheap ($100 or so for 30 minutes or so), and will give you information that is very much worthwhile, both at the start phase (negotiating your employment) and exit phase (termination/resignation) of your job.

CA is an "at will" state. For those employees (not contractors) not covered by a union contract, there are really three different ways to end employment:

1. Termination for Cause - your employer decides to fire you, and cites one of a limited number of state-specified reasons for doing so. Generally, "for cause" is limited to (documented) bad behavior on the employee's part. Usually not criminal behavior (criminal behavior at the company falls within "for cause", however), but for things like repeated violations of confidentiality, perpetual tardiness, etc. This is quite narrow, and the employee generally has to have a documented trail of bad behavior, and been formally warned about it by the company. Termination for Cause can be done at any time, is effective immediately with no notice, and the ex-employee DOES NOT have the right to State Unemployment Benefits.
2. Termination without Cause - the company decides they don't want you for a reason other than one that falls under "for cause". It can be simply that your job isn't needed anymore, you pissed off the CEO, you don't seem to have the skills for the job, they don't like the color of your shirt, etc. Within the first 3 months of your employment with the company, they can fire you at any time, with no notice, and your employment ends when they notify you. After 3 months of employment, 2 weeks notice of termination of employment is required. In either case, you qualify for State Unemployment Benefits after leaving.
3. Resignation - the employee decides to quit. This can be done at any time, for any reason. The employee is REQUIRED to give 2 weeks notice as to the date they will cease being an employee. Failure to do so can be considered "work abandonment", and can be reasons to be fired under "for cause". Of course, since you're quitting anyway, it's seldom an issue. Employees quitting are not eligible for State Unemployment Benefits.

Now, what happens often these days is that the company notifies you that you are terminated, and then tells you (e.g. locks you out, etc) that you are not to come to work for the next 2 weeks. The same applies to people resigning when they give notice (as the OP found out). HOWEVER, you are STILL CONSIDERED EMPLOYED by the company until the 2 week period is up. This is often important for Stock vesting, etc. And don't let them fool you that the "2 weeks pay" thing is a "severance package". It isn't. They are REQUIRED to pay you as long as you are an employee.

Don't Ever Sign Any End-Of-Employment Contract To Get a 2-Week Severance. You're an idiot if you do - they owe you the money in any case. The only time you should sign one of the agreements is to get money beyond what would be coming to you AFTER YOUR RESIGNATION/TERMINATION DATE (not the date you gave/received notice).

As a side note, this idiotic "walk-them-out-when-they-resign" policy seems to have originated in Silicon Valley in the 90s, as a consequence of the Dot-Com boom. Too many companies with no proper HR department not having any sort of a clue as to how to professionally hire/fire people. Unfortunately, it seems to have become a trend (it's the norm here in Silicon Valley for everyone, including the huge companies), which is telling as to the lowered quality of management (and HR) of companies these days.

-Erik

This is a GOOD thing

[draxbear]

It's a matter of perspective.

The employer is doing themselves, but more importantly YOU a favor with this behaviour.

Why? Well besides the nice paid two weeks off, you are now officially not responsible.

If they didn't do this you are vulnerable to accusations at a later date if something goes wrong with a server that is traced to a point in time you were on your two weeks to bail.

Yes it's possible you could have sabotaged something before giving notice, and tough luck if they catch you at it. However you can't be held responsible for anything from the point of resignation onwards if removed as he described.

Re:Australia isn't First World?

[ozmanjusri]

Shhh, I'm angling for "Informative".

Saved from a living hell!

[OldCrasher]

I have seen those 2 weeks you longed for turn into a living hell. You are a lame duck in those 2 weeks. No wants to speak to you, except to talk about the weather, or how some dimwit in purchasing just ordered a ton of toilet paper. No one gives you any constructive work to do, just 'write down everything you know about anything this company does, and that you had a hand in programming, over say, the last 99 years...' You were saved from someones timetabled exit startegy that would have had you doing 35 debriefings, none of which would have been attended, and seven planning for the future meetings, none of which you could care a hoot about.

That 2 week notice, and its subsequent conversion into personal TV time, saved you from a whole lot of really boring nothing. Now, go home, get in the car, switch off the GPS and head in which ever direction you see a hawk flying, and don't stop for anything other than gas for 500 miles.

Live a little; the new job is just as likely to suck the life out of you as the old one did.

I wish it were like that...

[Tangurena]

At the most recent company I worked for, I also gave 2 weeks notice, but was called on Sunday to "not bother coming in again." I was surprised that my boss also wanted a written explanation of why I was leaving. GOod for me as I got to move my start date at the new company up a week.

Resignation letters should never be more than:

1. I will be resigning my position at $COMPANY.
2. My last day of work will be $DATE
3. (optional) My current mailing address is $ADDRESS

No more need be stated. As a new person was starting the following Monday, it would have been smarter for me to stay those 2 weeks training the new guy. As it was, they get to do it themselves.

It is almost impossible to actually explain fully and honestly why you're leaving without sounding bitter or nasty. Gee, Mr BossMan, I'm getting a 50% pay raise, 75% shorter commute, working with new technology, doing interesting (very not-boring) stuff, and the new place uses source code control too!

At least most places are not as bad as banks: if they overhear you talking about leaving, that will be your last day at work.

Better ways...

[Alomex]

I informed my boss that I would be quitting as soon as we completed our current project, and that I would not leave any time earlier than that, as I would never leave my team stranded halfway a project. I also asked him not to tell my team so as not to demoralize them. In the end this was in the order of six weeks notice which was sufficient for him to plan a replacement strategy.

Once we had finished everything to satisfaction, I told my boss that I would be gone at the end of the week. He gave me two extra weeks of salary and told me that I would retain priviliged access to all accounts for another two months, in case my help was needed. He's a class guy and not long after that he was promoted.

Chalk one down for the good guys for once.

Here's an interesting approach...

[iwrasahp]

...that was used by a former Apple employee

I actually said that to my last employer.

[El Camino SS]

    I told them that I was walking off of the job, RIGHT NOW, and that was all there was to it.

    One of the bosses got upset with me and said that it was discourteous to do something like that. You should give two weeks notice that it would get back to you later and you might not be able to get a job for a stunt like that.

    I then told them that my employment was a contract where you paid me for services, and if you fired me, you would walk me out of the building immediately.

    "So, I'm firing you. You're all incompetent, and the system is failing due to that. Consider my vacant position as a sign of things to come."

    When I walked it stirred people. That next week they lost three. Two more quit the next week. I was an underground leader of the staff, and when I went, the whole place saw my lead and thought it wasn't worth it.

    All in all, it was the most worthy thing I've done in years.

You did the right thing

[hendersj]

Just remember that you have no control over how other people react to your decisions.

When I left my last job, I gave my notice and then talked to the director of data security and asked him how he wanted to handle transitioning my authority around. I told him straight up that my reputation is too important to me to leave privileged accounts behind, and that I would appreciate having the opportunity to disable my own access so I would be sure it was done properly. I didn't want something to happen and then for the company to think it was me because I'd recently left and had all sorts of authority on the systems.

My boss had already known of my feelings about that sort of thing, because we had talked about it in the past when others had left. He was fully aware of the conversation I had with the director of data security, and he was cool with it. He knew me well enough to know that I took my responsibilities seriously and wasn't going to do something that would bite me in the ass down the road.

I've seen that sort of thing happen; when I was in college, we had a guy who said he wanted to learn, so we gave him administrative access on the systems. He never showed up, and as inexperienced as we were, we didn't revoke his access. He went in and changed all of the passwords and locked out all of the administrative accounts after deleting his own account. He left a trail so blindingly clear that when the US Air Force called to do a security background check on him, they were informed about it (though not by me - but I was in the room when the call came in). The last I heard (and this was many years ago, so his circumstances may have changed), he was finishing up a 6 year ROTC tour of duty but unable to get a security clearance. Do you know how many jobs there are in the US Air Force involving computer science degrees that don't require a security clearance? Not many....

My boss understood that having seen someone screw their career over (former boss was ex-Navy, and had a top secret clearance) because they decided to act stupid with their authority meant that I wasn't about to do the same. I've always assumed that when it comes to IT systems, someone's watching me and I may not know how they're watching me, so I just don't screw around with the authority.

Being a systems administrator means that you have to be trustworthy - and trusted by your management. I've always said that if management doesn't trust a systems administrator (and if they don't for a good reason), then the systems administrator shouldn't be administering their systems. The fact that there is a lot of very sensitive corporate data accessible to someone with those types of rights means that you have to trust that they're not going to abuse their authority. That doesn't mean that you don't put auditing systems in place to audit access to sensitive data, but in most companies, the ones putting those systems in place are the system administrators, so they know the ins and outs of those systems - including how and where to disable them.

black and blue

[Michael Wardle]

The Adelaide Crows wear red, gold, and navy, rather than the red, gold, and black of the German Flag.

Oddly, however, the St Kilda Saints did share the German colors at one point.

Very funny post, I just thought you'd find this interesting.

Broken Policy

[Effugas]

From a security standpoint, the resignation standpoint appears flawed. The resigner has full control of when he delivers the information, so he can simply delay his announcement until he's completed his malicious activity. It would take a very stupid attacker to steal materials _after_ providing notice.

But empirically, it may very well be that there are some very stupid attackers.

Only two weeks notice? Why not 3 months?

[Terje Mathisen]

I live in Norway, but have worked in the US previously.

The standard 2-week notice never ceases to amaze me, here in Norway the standard is "3 months, starting at the end of the current month."

Yes, a very few companies will still pay you to quit immediately, but you cannot depend upon this, which means that both employee and employer needs to consider their actions more carefully: You, as the employee, cannot walk away immediately, even if you have many weeks of acrued leave/vacation time, and your boss cannot fire you immediately without having to explain how a 3-4 month severance payment ended up on his balance sheet.

Yes, sometimes this sucks, but mostly I believe it to be a very good idea.

Terje

Re:Australia isn't First World?

[bakes]

You forgot to mention that South Australia has one of the highest numbers in the world of serial killers per capita. I never really understood why that was so until I read your post.

That's exactly what they *should* do

[gujo-odori]

"Don't have a cow, man."

I've been in the sysadmin and security fields for a number of years. As many others have written, this is SOP in many shops and is exactly what they *should* do. Yes, it's also true that a really nefarious person would have already planted all of his/her backdoors, trojans, whatever, well before resigning, but not all nefarious people are that smart, and some people just get a bug up their ass at the last minute and do something foolish (it's not common, but neither is it non-existent). Plus, if you think they might be a bad actor, or you just have really stringent security policies, you can put the person on leave and immediately start a security audit of everything they touched or might have touched.

If I gave notice tomorrow,I would not only expect to be immediately placed on administrative leave, I would hope for it. Beats showing up for work those two weeks :) But since I'm a manager, I probably wouldn't get that lucky. If you were a sysadmin on my staff, I'd pull your access immediately and put you on leave, too. It wouldn't be personal, or any kind of reflection on your work. It's business, and it's good security policy.

As far as how to resign professionally, speaking as a person who was rank and file for a long time and who currently managages a security staff of eight people, a letter of resignation should contain just the facts, and the bare minimum at that. It should state that you are resigning, and the effective date. That's it. And it should be written in polite and professional language. It doesn't need to say why (that's none of anyone's business), and really shouldn't. If you just can't help yourself, "To pursue other opportunities" is the best thing to say.

Whether you have another job or not, or where, or why (really) you're quitting is not any of anyone's business. If people ask, you can tell them, or you can politely respond that you'd rather not say. Or tell a small lie and say you're going to pursue other opportunities, but aren't yet sure what shape they will take. Even if one of my staff resigned and told me that, and I later found out they had another job with our competition, I wouldn't be angry (OK, maybe I'm not your average boss, either); they don't owe me that truth. Why you're resigning and what you're going to do next is your business. All you owe your company apart from a letter of resignation as described above is a final two weeks of work up to your usual standard, if they do choose to have you work rather than put you on administrative leave.

Fuck 'em

[evil_one666]

This is their problem, not yours. You have been professional, they have not. Move on.

2 good reasons for sending a leaver home on pay

[Anonymous Coward]

I sent a key member of staff home within an hour of his resignation. There were two reasons for this:

1) Morale of other staff - There is nothing worse than hearing somebody tell you that grass is greener where they're going.
2) I knew that if I sent him home and there was a good chance that I'd find out within a month whether he had some vital knowledge that we needed. This would not be have been noticed if he had worked his notice period. If he did have knowledge or skills that we needed, better to find out during his notice period at home. If we call him while he is still on the payroll, he has a duty to respond.

"Corporate secrets" or "vandalism" were pretty low on my priority list to be honest. If this was going to happen, it had probably happened already.

Re:2 good reasons for sending a leaver home on pay

[MaxRahder]

1) Morale of other staff - There is nothing worse than hearing somebody tell you that grass is greener where they're going.

I think there's nothing worse for the other staff than seeing how shabby a company treats someone who has worked hard helping the company meet its goals. I've been at three companies where someone on my team was disappeared by HR. In all cases the person leaving wanted to do the right thing to minimize the effect of their departure. It was a depressing blow to the entire team when the company acted on the assumption that the person -- and by extention, any member of the team -- was an immanent threat, despite the person's history of loyal professionalism and service.

Only in America

[sita]

Seriously. Only in America does one assume that an employee who quits or is terminated would try to do sabotage if there has been no animosity before. Really, why would anyone sabotage stuff after they hand in their resignation? There was plenty of time before. People who routinely revoke employees privileges before the last day of employment should have their heads examined. They are a bit more paranoid than what is healthy. (Paranoia and believing in conspiracies seems to be a major culturar trait in the US, so it might be difficult to find a shrink to actually cure you, but still.)

Not so in Europe

[Aceticon]

Most certain not in Holland.

Around here, leaving usually means a 1 month notice period, and in all the places i worked in, people always work until the last day except if having have some vacation days left and wanting to take them (non-used vacation days are redeemed for money when one leaves).

Even more important, in the vast majority of places i've worked in the company will do a goodbye party for you.

In my last position, even though i now work as a freelancer, after i decided i wasn't going to accept anymore extensions to my contract and on my last day in, they still did a goodbye party for me and gave me a bottle of Cognac as a goodbye present.

I've seen it happen for others, so i ain't been getting goodbye parties 'cause they're happy that I am leaving ;)

Reading above that what happened to the OI is a "usual" behaviour and part of the POF just makes me want to ask - "What the fuck kind of sick employer-employee relation do you guys have there?"

If anything...

[Karl Cocknozzle]

...this article suggests you should give one month's notice. If they terminate you immediately, at least you're in a stronger position to negotiate for your "last month's" pay... Of course, if they're doing it because they hate you then you might just get told to piss off.

Yeah, employers are not loyal to employees. He is totally right... The attitude that corporations have towards employees, and especially "IT" employees leaves much to be desired.

I'll say it again in case the middle managers can't hear me: Nobody will show you any loyalty until you show us some. You can't expect someone who has been laid off due to others' incompetence more than once to suddenly get all gung ho about a company he's worked at for a short time without a significant commitment on the company's part. Want to pitch the low-ball? Just remember that you're chipping away at that new relationship with every thing that you expect somebody to "swallow." Low-pay and bad leadership are the most frequently cited reasons in our exit-interviews--if you also later cut benefits or take away holidays or forfeiting vacation days unused on December 31.

Every little chip at the wall weakens it a little. Every chink in the armor can be exploited--by crapping on employees so mercilessly, in the end, you sour your own prospects for prosperity. Employees aren't a disease to be eradicated, they're team members whose skills must be cultivated.

Ah, the innocence of youth

[dahlstedt]

Over the past past 30+ years, I've resigned, walked out (don't do this!), been 'laid-off', rifted, terminated... At least a couple of times. In the 60's and 70's depending on whether or not you worked for a "secure" facility, any termination (yours or theirs) would get you 5 Min's to gather your personals (under security supervision)and an escort off-site, or a discussion with your "boss", HR exit interview and send-off party. We (mainframe techs) tended to move around a lot - followed the money. In the 80's companies started to realize the amount of agony a dissatisfied "techie" could cause. Most organizations started to class anyone who had "root" access as a "high-risk" employee. That meant that if you resigned, and gave 2 weeks notice - you would be taking that 2 weeks at home. You most likely would have a couple of exit interviews, but yes, you would immediately loose all access to any corporate system. And it's not going to change. Distributed systems only expose more of the "corporate asset" to mal-treatment. Sure, you could do anything you wanted - and then resign, but that's neither professional or proper. When you go to work for a company, you enter into a contract - written or not. You agree to do some work, at a certain level, and the company agrees to pay a certain amount. As long as both parties conform, all is well. When you resign, you are terminating the contract/agreement and should realize that you will be treated in a manner that will protect the other party. Just be thankful that you weren't subjected to the dreaded "escort service". BTW, I've been "laid-off" on Monday, escorted off-site, and back with a raise on Wednesday. If you are truly professional, strive to excel, you will always be treated professionally.

Debends on the Job and the Situation

[Tangential]

I run a small = 100 person consulting firm and for the most part, when people resign, we let all positions (including systems) work out their notice, with 1 exception. We rarely let sales people remain around because once they've resigned, their interests and efforts are generally oriented towards their new job and not towards laying the foundations for sales they'll never finish. I almost always let them go immediately, with a couple of exceptions. Retirement is one and spousal transfer is another. In those cases, it is a transition planned over several months and generally involves a smooth and gradual handoff of accounts.

When my Systems guys resign, we generally involve them in the interviewing of successors process and we have them help up phase them out of our systems.

When consultants resign and they don't currently have accounts that they are managing, we take them up on the offer to leave anytime in the 2 weeks and let them leave for their new job immediately. They generally give 'up to 2 weeks notice.'

Once piece of advice to anyone resigning. Unless you detest the organization and would never return, don't burn any bridges. Remain helpful and cordial or you will have insured that you never return.

Are your feelings hurt?

[gelfling]

Otherwise I can't imagine why you would care. And let me sharpen that point by stating that for the vast majority of you out there, the old saw to not burn your bridges is in fact nonsense. The likelihood of you returning to an ex employer except in the circumstances of immediately returning as a contractor, are near zero. You want to leave and they don't want you back.

So, get over the hurt feelings stage, take your 2 week sabbatical to lay whatever prep work with your new employer you can. In fact, I make it rule to never state whether I'm actually taking a new job or not. That's not your old employer's information to chew on. If they ask, politely be vague about 'a few options cooking right now'. This helps avoid the discussion of non competes, etc. Basically it's not their business.

Next, if you're locked out then you are also free to refuse to help them in any other way as well. If some soon to be ex coworker comes to you with a question related to your former duties you should answer them in only the most general terms or not at all. Otherwise you're warranting a system you have no control over and may have already been changed in some way. I would also send a note to HR stating that since you have been locked out you cannot be held responsible for the condition, failure, state of any device from that date forward, for any reason. If you have to do it in a hardcopy letter because you're locked out, all the better.

Also remember to tell them to change your voicemail password on a given date.

Google DoD STD 5220.22-M and get a piece of freeware that can wipe your disks per that standard. Tell your soon to be ex employer you are doing that unless of course there are published rules that forbid you from wiping your disk.

Throw the card keys, swipe cards and cable locks over your shoulder, wave buh bye to the square badge and leave.

Plan Ahead

[Denagoth]

The "two weeks notice" rule is a polite tradition that only employees are following. I have seen companies fire someone at 4 PM on a Friday, confiscate their laptop, and escort them from the building. Indeed, one popular belief is that this is the best way to terminate an employee because it minimizes the company's risk from the any actions that the employee make take.

In today's era of disappearing pension plans, Enron-style scandals, and myopic focus on productivity and profit, it is important to remember that the company - and by extension, all personnel within the company - are out to protect their interests first. In essence, corporate loyalty is a one-sided myth that companies promote to serve their own purposes. So here are some of my general thoughts on the resignation process:

1. Don't tell anyone that you're interviewing for another job (your manager may terminate you just for looking).

2. Don't tell anyone that you've accepted another job (since the offer could fall through at the last minute). If the new company wants references, use previous employers, customers, or close co-workers, but not your manager.

3. Negotiate your transition date with the new company on your terms - plan for some time off between jobs if you'd like.

4. Transfer all data and material from your laptop to storage at home. Sanitize the laptop as necessary. Wiping the entire drive and turning it in sans bootable OS is perfectly acceptable in my book.

5. If you aren't leaving just for more money, but are truly disappointed in the lack of vision and direction within the company, felt you were poorly managed, or are leaving for ethical concerns, draft a letter to the President / CEO (regardless of who your boss is) explaining why you are resigning. You only get two opportunities in life to tell the CEO of a company the unvarnished truth: (a) When you resign, and (b) When you win the lottery.

6. Once you're satisifed that your data is safe and that you've got a solid new job to move into with another company, decide on your notification strategy:

      - Two weeks notice: Inform your manager and then sit at home and play games or read some good books at work (accompanied by long lunches until they confiscate your corporate credit card).

      - 24-48 hrs notice: Inform your manager you'll be gone in two days and tell him (sincerely) best wishes for the future.

7. Submit your resignation paperwork and fire off the letter discussed in #5 above to the CEO / President.

Good luck!

Here's why

[Del Vach]

I used to work at an executive outplacement firm where we'd basically help people who got laid off, usually en masse (a service their former employer paid for). My job was mainly resume and cover letter-centric, but our consultants actually went to the locations and helped with the big, 'So long and thanks for all the fish" meetings.

Most people are just depressed and angry, but some people will try to get revenge. One of our consultants was meeting with an exec, told him he was being laid off, and he basically ran out of the room and started making lots of phone calls to cancel a big event he had coordinated for his company. So while it's not fair to most people and I do think it's generally like pouring salt in a fresh wound, some people will strike back as hard as they can, and those edge cases are the reason the 'good' ones get the same shaft.

Make them see that they need you.

[Deputy Doodah]

I've always included on my resignation letter a list of tasks I need to complete before leaving. That tells them that you haven't lost your work ethic, you're just moving, and it shows them that they still need you.

I resigned from a job last year, and my boss honored my two week notice because he could see he still needed me to finish up my projects. This is a guy with a reputation for showing people the door.

Of course it's also important to communicate a positive reason that you are leaving. For instance, I left my job in California because I couldn't afford a house in that state. Yeah I had some beefs, but I didn't mention them. I made them clearly understand I was not leaving out of dislike for the job. It's to your advantage to do this even if you actually do dislike your job.

It turns out that the company I'm with now has entered a partnership with my old company and I find myself working with my old boss as a peer. Leaving on a good note has allowed us to get along pretty well. You never know how the leaf is going to turn so be careful what you say.

April 20th is...

[Tangurena]

April 20th is the birthday of Hitler. It is also the anniversary of the Columbine High School Massacre. April 19th is the anniversary of the Waco Massacre and the McVeigh's Oklahoma City bombing.